WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.399 --> 00:00:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bedtime Astronomy. Explore the wonders of the cosmos

2
00:00:07.759 --> 00:00:12.279
<v Speaker 1>with our soothing Bedtime Astronomie podcast. Each episode offers a

3
00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>gentle journey through the stars, planets, and beyond, perfect for

4
00:00:16.399 --> 00:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>unwinding after a long day. Let's travel through the mysteries

5
00:00:20.239 --> 00:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of the universe as you drift off into a peaceful

6
00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>slumber under the night sky.

7
00:00:26.960 --> 00:00:30.559
<v Speaker 2>Imagine for a second, you're just looking up at the

8
00:00:30.640 --> 00:00:33.119
<v Speaker 2>night sky, right right, just taking it in. Yeah, and

9
00:00:33.159 --> 00:00:36.039
<v Speaker 2>you're watching one of the absolute brightest street lights in

10
00:00:36.079 --> 00:00:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the entire universe simply turn off, just completely go dark exactly.

11
00:00:40.920 --> 00:00:43.119
<v Speaker 2>And I don't mean fading away over millions of years

12
00:00:43.119 --> 00:00:46.600
<v Speaker 2>as the cosmos slowly ages. I mean we are talking

13
00:00:46.640 --> 00:00:50.840
<v Speaker 2>about a beacon so luminous that it outshines entire galaxies

14
00:00:50.920 --> 00:00:54.600
<v Speaker 2>oh easily, and it dims so incredibly fast that you

15
00:00:54.759 --> 00:00:57.799
<v Speaker 2>actually witness it happen within a fraction of your own lifetime.

16
00:00:58.200 --> 00:01:02.840
<v Speaker 3>It's it really is a staggering image, and I think

17
00:01:02.840 --> 00:01:07.400
<v Speaker 3>it fundamentally breaks how we are taught to perceive the cosmos, right,

18
00:01:07.560 --> 00:01:10.239
<v Speaker 3>because we're basically conditioned to view the universe as this

19
00:01:11.000 --> 00:01:11.879
<v Speaker 3>static painting.

20
00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:14.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like it's unchanging exactly.

21
00:01:14.480 --> 00:01:17.120
<v Speaker 3>We just assume that astronomical changes happen on these massive

22
00:01:17.159 --> 00:01:21.480
<v Speaker 3>time scales that render a single human life practically invisible.

23
00:01:21.079 --> 00:01:22.879
<v Speaker 2>A blink of an eye, right, But.

24
00:01:22.879 --> 00:01:27.239
<v Speaker 3>The event we're gysecting today it proves that assumption completely

25
00:01:27.439 --> 00:01:28.439
<v Speaker 3>undeniably wrong.

26
00:01:28.879 --> 00:01:32.400
<v Speaker 2>And that is exactly our mission today. We are taking

27
00:01:32.439 --> 00:01:36.400
<v Speaker 2>a journey roughly ten billion light years across the universe

28
00:01:36.760 --> 00:01:42.439
<v Speaker 2>to explore a cosmic anomaly that is frankly forcing astrophysicists

29
00:01:42.480 --> 00:01:44.480
<v Speaker 2>to rewrite the entire rule book.

30
00:01:44.599 --> 00:01:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they really are.

31
00:01:45.840 --> 00:01:49.760
<v Speaker 2>We are investigating the sudden, dramatic and honestly pretty violent

32
00:01:49.920 --> 00:01:52.519
<v Speaker 2>dimming of a very distant galaxy.

33
00:01:52.680 --> 00:01:54.519
<v Speaker 3>Violent is definitely the right word for it.

34
00:01:54.560 --> 00:01:56.560
<v Speaker 2>And by the time we're done here, you'll understand the

35
00:01:56.959 --> 00:02:01.200
<v Speaker 2>intricate machinery that powers the brightest objects in the cosmos.

36
00:02:00.760 --> 00:02:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Which is fascinating in itself.

37
00:02:02.239 --> 00:02:05.959
<v Speaker 2>Oh absolutely. Plus you'll see how astronomical cold case detectives

38
00:02:06.079 --> 00:02:09.919
<v Speaker 2>essentially use seventy year old evidence to solve modern mysteries.

39
00:02:10.000 --> 00:02:11.240
<v Speaker 3>I love that part of the story.

40
00:02:11.319 --> 00:02:13.680
<v Speaker 2>It's so good. And we'll get into why everything we

41
00:02:13.719 --> 00:02:16.080
<v Speaker 2>thought we knew about the life span of supermassive black

42
00:02:16.080 --> 00:02:18.879
<v Speaker 2>holes might just need to be thrown right out the window.

43
00:02:19.159 --> 00:02:23.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because to really appreciate the shockwave, this scent through

44
00:02:23.960 --> 00:02:27.159
<v Speaker 3>the astrophysics community, we first have to, well, we have

45
00:02:27.199 --> 00:02:30.080
<v Speaker 3>to establish the scene of the cosmic crime, so to speak.

46
00:02:30.199 --> 00:02:31.719
<v Speaker 2>Right, let's set the stage. Where are we looking?

47
00:02:31.960 --> 00:02:36.919
<v Speaker 3>So the focus is this specific incredibly distant galaxy. It's

48
00:02:37.000 --> 00:02:39.560
<v Speaker 3>cataloged is JA zero two one eight minus serio zero

49
00:02:39.560 --> 00:02:43.439
<v Speaker 3>three at six. Patchy name, very catchy, right, standard astronomical naming.

50
00:02:44.120 --> 00:02:47.639
<v Speaker 3>But astronomers measure the distance to these far off objects

51
00:02:47.680 --> 00:02:50.199
<v Speaker 3>using a metric called red shift. Okay, and Jay zero

52
00:02:50.319 --> 00:02:52.400
<v Speaker 3>two one eight has a red shift of one point eight.

53
00:02:52.639 --> 00:02:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Let's actually break down what a red shift of one

54
00:02:54.800 --> 00:02:57.560
<v Speaker 2>point eight actually means, because you know, it's not just

55
00:02:57.599 --> 00:02:59.000
<v Speaker 2>a physical distance.

56
00:02:58.680 --> 00:03:00.439
<v Speaker 3>Right, It's not just miles or coldometers.

57
00:03:00.520 --> 00:03:04.080
<v Speaker 2>No, it's a temporal distance. It's time because light takes

58
00:03:04.080 --> 00:03:07.759
<v Speaker 2>time to travel. Looking across space is quite literally looking

59
00:03:07.800 --> 00:03:12.080
<v Speaker 2>back in time, cosmic time machine exactly. It's like receiving

60
00:03:12.080 --> 00:03:14.599
<v Speaker 2>a postcard in the mail that took ten billion years

61
00:03:14.639 --> 00:03:15.120
<v Speaker 2>to arrive.

62
00:03:15.280 --> 00:03:16.280
<v Speaker 3>That's a great way to put it.

63
00:03:16.319 --> 00:03:18.879
<v Speaker 2>And the unsettling part is, as you're holding this ancient

64
00:03:18.919 --> 00:03:22.520
<v Speaker 2>postcard in your hands, the picture on the front drastically

65
00:03:22.560 --> 00:03:24.080
<v Speaker 2>fades right before your eyes.

66
00:03:24.240 --> 00:03:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. That temporal aspect is so vital to understand because

67
00:03:27.560 --> 00:03:29.800
<v Speaker 3>when we observe the light from j zero to le eight,

68
00:03:30.240 --> 00:03:32.159
<v Speaker 3>we are seeing the universe as it was when it

69
00:03:32.240 --> 00:03:34.560
<v Speaker 3>was only roughly a third of its current age.

70
00:03:34.680 --> 00:03:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Wow, only a third.

71
00:03:36.039 --> 00:03:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this era around a redshift of two. Astronomers often

72
00:03:40.280 --> 00:03:42.360
<v Speaker 3>referred to it as cosmic noon.

73
00:03:42.719 --> 00:03:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Cosmic noon. That sounds intense.

74
00:03:45.240 --> 00:03:49.280
<v Speaker 3>It was. It was this period of intense rapid star formation.

75
00:03:49.919 --> 00:03:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Galaxies were incredibly active, chaotic, constantly colliding and merging.

76
00:03:54.439 --> 00:03:57.879
<v Speaker 2>So finding a tremendously bright object in that specific era

77
00:03:58.039 --> 00:03:59.400
<v Speaker 2>isn't really the surprise, right.

78
00:03:59.400 --> 00:04:01.759
<v Speaker 3>Not at all. We expect things to be bright and

79
00:04:01.840 --> 00:04:05.400
<v Speaker 3>violent back then. The shot came when an international team

80
00:04:05.479 --> 00:04:08.960
<v Speaker 3>led by Tomochi Morrikuma at the Cheap Institute of Technology,

81
00:04:09.319 --> 00:04:11.599
<v Speaker 3>when they discovered that the brightness of jayas zero two

82
00:04:11.599 --> 00:04:15.800
<v Speaker 3>to ODA suddenly plummeted to just one twentieth of its

83
00:04:15.840 --> 00:04:19.240
<v Speaker 3>original level. We're twentieth And the craziest part, it did

84
00:04:19.240 --> 00:04:21.600
<v Speaker 3>this in merely twenty earth years see a.

85
00:04:21.560 --> 00:04:24.279
<v Speaker 2>Twenty full drop. I mean that means we are looking

86
00:04:24.279 --> 00:04:27.319
<v Speaker 2>at a system that went from operating at peak luminosity

87
00:04:27.399 --> 00:04:30.279
<v Speaker 2>down to just five percent of its previous output five percent.

88
00:04:30.360 --> 00:04:33.000
<v Speaker 2>If you're say, driving to work right now, think about

89
00:04:33.000 --> 00:04:35.800
<v Speaker 2>the engine in your car. Okay, if your engine suddenly

90
00:04:35.800 --> 00:04:38.600
<v Speaker 2>lost ninety five percent of its power, you wouldn't just

91
00:04:38.639 --> 00:04:39.839
<v Speaker 2>call it a minor fluctuation.

92
00:04:40.000 --> 00:04:42.040
<v Speaker 3>No, you'd pull over immediately, right.

93
00:04:42.079 --> 00:04:44.399
<v Speaker 2>You would assume a catastrophic mechanical failure.

94
00:04:44.920 --> 00:04:47.720
<v Speaker 3>That is a highly accurate way to frame it, actually,

95
00:04:48.199 --> 00:04:51.439
<v Speaker 3>because an object visible from ten billion light years away

96
00:04:52.120 --> 00:04:56.319
<v Speaker 3>is generating energy on a scale that completely defies everyday comprehension.

97
00:04:56.360 --> 00:04:59.680
<v Speaker 3>It's unfathomable, truly, So to lose ninety five percent of

98
00:04:59.680 --> 00:05:03.480
<v Speaker 3>that ma massive energy output in just two decades, it

99
00:05:03.600 --> 00:05:07.399
<v Speaker 3>signals a complete systemic breakdown of the engine driving that light.

100
00:05:07.680 --> 00:05:10.279
<v Speaker 2>Which brings us to the mechanics of the engine itself,

101
00:05:10.480 --> 00:05:13.639
<v Speaker 2>because a twenty fold drop in brightness is massive. But

102
00:05:13.759 --> 00:05:16.199
<v Speaker 2>to grasp the true scale of what was lost, we

103
00:05:16.240 --> 00:05:18.800
<v Speaker 2>really need to understand what was generating all that light

104
00:05:18.839 --> 00:05:19.600
<v Speaker 2>in the first place.

105
00:05:19.800 --> 00:05:21.759
<v Speaker 3>Right, what's the fuel? What's the engine?

106
00:05:21.839 --> 00:05:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because we are just talking about a really big

107
00:05:24.199 --> 00:05:26.920
<v Speaker 2>cluster of stars here, No, definitely not. We are talking

108
00:05:27.000 --> 00:05:30.600
<v Speaker 2>about an active galactic nucleus or an agn Yeah, so.

109
00:05:30.600 --> 00:05:33.560
<v Speaker 3>If we look at the anatomy of most large galaxies,

110
00:05:33.600 --> 00:05:37.079
<v Speaker 3>including our own, actually we find a supermassive black hole

111
00:05:37.199 --> 00:05:37.839
<v Speaker 3>right at the core.

112
00:05:38.000 --> 00:05:40.000
<v Speaker 2>And when we say super massive, we are.

113
00:05:39.920 --> 00:05:43.279
<v Speaker 3>Talking about an object with a mass of hundreds of millions,

114
00:05:43.399 --> 00:05:46.759
<v Speaker 3>sometimes billions of times the mass of our own sun.

115
00:05:47.240 --> 00:05:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Just compact it into a tiny point.

116
00:05:49.240 --> 00:05:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, compacted into a relatively tiny region of space. Now,

117
00:05:53.680 --> 00:05:57.759
<v Speaker 3>in a quiet galaxy like our Milky Way, the black

118
00:05:57.759 --> 00:06:01.519
<v Speaker 3>hole is mostly dormant right sitting there, Yeah, it's fasting.

119
00:06:01.959 --> 00:06:06.480
<v Speaker 3>But in an active galactic nucleus, the environment is violently chaotic.

120
00:06:06.800 --> 00:06:10.120
<v Speaker 3>You have these immense clouds of gas and dust constantly

121
00:06:10.160 --> 00:06:12.639
<v Speaker 3>being pulled inward by the black hole's gravity.

122
00:06:12.720 --> 00:06:15.199
<v Speaker 2>But wait, knowing the engine is powered by a black

123
00:06:15.199 --> 00:06:18.519
<v Speaker 2>hole makes this whole scenario sound incredibly counterintuitive to me.

124
00:06:18.879 --> 00:06:22.439
<v Speaker 2>How so, Well, we all know the fundamental rule of astrophysics, right,

125
00:06:23.120 --> 00:06:27.319
<v Speaker 2>nothing escapes the event horizon, right, not even light exactly.

126
00:06:27.839 --> 00:06:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Black Holes are the ultimate cosmic vacuum cleaners. They trap light.

127
00:06:32.680 --> 00:06:35.439
<v Speaker 2>So how is it that the area immediately surrounding the

128
00:06:35.519 --> 00:06:38.800
<v Speaker 2>darkest object in the universe somehow becomes the brightest thing

129
00:06:38.839 --> 00:06:39.959
<v Speaker 2>we can possibly see.

130
00:06:40.079 --> 00:06:43.480
<v Speaker 3>It is honestly one of the most beautiful paradoxes in physics.

131
00:06:43.639 --> 00:06:46.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is it purely just the friction of some

132
00:06:46.199 --> 00:06:47.199
<v Speaker 2>cosmic traffic gem.

133
00:06:47.399 --> 00:06:49.639
<v Speaker 3>That's a huge part of it. The key is really

134
00:06:49.680 --> 00:06:52.399
<v Speaker 3>differentiating the black hole itself from its surrounding environment.

135
00:06:52.480 --> 00:06:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, separate the hole from the waiting room exactly.

136
00:06:55.759 --> 00:06:59.639
<v Speaker 3>The event horizon is the boundary of no return. But

137
00:06:59.720 --> 00:07:03.680
<v Speaker 3>the light we see from an agn isn't coming from inside.

138
00:07:03.199 --> 00:07:06.040
<v Speaker 2>The black hole, obviously not because we wouldn't see it.

139
00:07:06.040 --> 00:07:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Right, It's coming from the accretion disc, that is, the

140
00:07:08.560 --> 00:07:11.480
<v Speaker 3>waiting room of material just outside the event horizon.

141
00:07:11.560 --> 00:07:13.160
<v Speaker 2>So what's happening in that waiting room?

142
00:07:13.360 --> 00:07:17.319
<v Speaker 3>Well, as gas is pulled inward, conservation of angular momentum

143
00:07:17.399 --> 00:07:19.199
<v Speaker 3>forces it to swirl around.

144
00:07:18.920 --> 00:07:21.800
<v Speaker 2>The black hole, kind of like water circling a drain.

145
00:07:22.000 --> 00:07:24.959
<v Speaker 3>Exactly like that, right, And it flattens out into this vast,

146
00:07:25.160 --> 00:07:27.639
<v Speaker 3>incredibly dense whirlpool of plasma.

147
00:07:27.759 --> 00:07:30.319
<v Speaker 2>And as that plasma spirals closer and closer to the

148
00:07:30.360 --> 00:07:32.959
<v Speaker 2>event horizon, it accelerates massively.

149
00:07:33.240 --> 00:07:36.079
<v Speaker 3>The inner tracks of this whirlpool are spinning at a

150
00:07:36.160 --> 00:07:39.240
<v Speaker 3>significant fraction of the speed of light. Wow. Meanwhile, the

151
00:07:39.279 --> 00:07:41.199
<v Speaker 3>outer tracks are moving much much slower.

152
00:07:41.519 --> 00:07:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Ah. Okay, so the inner lanes of the highway are

153
00:07:44.160 --> 00:07:47.639
<v Speaker 2>moving at near light speed and the outer lanes are sluggish.

154
00:07:47.720 --> 00:07:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And that differential rotation creates something we rarely associate

155
00:07:52.040 --> 00:07:54.839
<v Speaker 3>with the vacuum of space, which is profound.

156
00:07:54.399 --> 00:07:56.519
<v Speaker 2>Friction because things are rubbing together.

157
00:07:57.040 --> 00:08:01.040
<v Speaker 3>But it's not the simple mechanical friction of two solid

158
00:08:01.040 --> 00:08:04.800
<v Speaker 3>objects rubbing together, like rubbing your hands to get warm.

159
00:08:04.680 --> 00:08:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Right, because it's gas.

160
00:08:06.160 --> 00:08:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's plasma. They're dealing with plasma physics here, So

161
00:08:09.399 --> 00:08:12.560
<v Speaker 3>the friction is actually driven by magnetic fields threading through

162
00:08:12.560 --> 00:08:13.639
<v Speaker 3>this ionized gas.

163
00:08:13.720 --> 00:08:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh interesting.

164
00:08:14.639 --> 00:08:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, As these layers of plasma sheer against each other

165
00:08:17.839 --> 00:08:23.519
<v Speaker 3>at relativistic speeds, it triggers a phenomenon called magnetor rotational.

166
00:08:23.000 --> 00:08:26.639
<v Speaker 2>Instability magneto rotational instability.

167
00:08:26.680 --> 00:08:29.240
<v Speaker 3>That sounds like a mouthful it is, but basically it

168
00:08:29.319 --> 00:08:33.519
<v Speaker 3>just creates immense violent turbulence within the disk, okay. And

169
00:08:33.559 --> 00:08:37.559
<v Speaker 3>that turbulence is what converts the gravitational potential energy of

170
00:08:37.559 --> 00:08:40.399
<v Speaker 3>the in falling gas into staggering amounts of heat.

171
00:08:40.519 --> 00:08:42.080
<v Speaker 2>So we aren't just talking about the gas getting a

172
00:08:42.080 --> 00:08:43.639
<v Speaker 2>little warm, no, No.

173
00:08:43.679 --> 00:08:47.279
<v Speaker 3>The friction generated by these magnetic turbulent forces, heats the

174
00:08:47.320 --> 00:08:51.240
<v Speaker 3>plasma to hundreds of thousands, sometimes millions of degrees.

175
00:08:51.399 --> 00:08:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Millions of degrees.

176
00:08:52.679 --> 00:08:56.159
<v Speaker 3>That is insane, and at those extreme temperatures, the gas

177
00:08:56.200 --> 00:08:59.799
<v Speaker 3>glows brilliantly across the entire electromagnetic spectrum.

178
00:09:00.000 --> 00:09:02.120
<v Speaker 2>So it's basically screaming as it falls in.

179
00:09:02.559 --> 00:09:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, it's the death cry of the gas just before

180
00:09:05.480 --> 00:09:10.519
<v Speaker 3>it crosses the event horizon. And the efficiency of this

181
00:09:10.639 --> 00:09:13.200
<v Speaker 3>process is difficult to overstate.

182
00:09:13.440 --> 00:09:16.320
<v Speaker 2>How efficient is it compared to say, a star.

183
00:09:16.519 --> 00:09:20.679
<v Speaker 3>It's wildly more efficient. Dropping mass into a supermassive black

184
00:09:20.679 --> 00:09:23.559
<v Speaker 3>hole via an accretion disc is actually one of the

185
00:09:23.559 --> 00:09:26.960
<v Speaker 3>most efficient ways to generate energy in the known universe.

186
00:09:27.039 --> 00:09:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Wait, really more than fusion.

187
00:09:28.919 --> 00:09:31.879
<v Speaker 3>Far more efficient than the nuclear fusion powering stars like

188
00:09:31.919 --> 00:09:32.320
<v Speaker 3>our sun.

189
00:09:32.519 --> 00:09:33.279
<v Speaker 2>I had no idea.

190
00:09:33.440 --> 00:09:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that is exactly why a single agn can outshine

191
00:09:37.320 --> 00:09:39.120
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of billions of stars combined.

192
00:09:39.480 --> 00:09:42.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we have established this blindingly bright vortex of

193
00:09:42.720 --> 00:09:46.360
<v Speaker 2>superheated plasma rueled by the immense gravity of a monster

194
00:09:46.480 --> 00:09:49.720
<v Speaker 2>black hole pumping out more energy than entire galaxies.

195
00:09:49.799 --> 00:09:50.559
<v Speaker 3>That's the engine.

196
00:09:50.600 --> 00:09:53.039
<v Speaker 2>But knowing that the engine is a massive accretion disc

197
00:09:53.360 --> 00:09:56.399
<v Speaker 2>makes this rapid shut down even more impossible to believe

198
00:09:56.559 --> 00:09:59.279
<v Speaker 2>it really does, because we are talking about physical structures

199
00:09:59.279 --> 00:10:00.679
<v Speaker 2>that are light years cross right.

200
00:10:00.799 --> 00:10:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes yes, they are immense.

201
00:10:02.919 --> 00:10:06.919
<v Speaker 2>So the inertia alone means an engine that massive physically

202
00:10:06.960 --> 00:10:09.720
<v Speaker 2>cannot stop that fast. You can't hit the brakes on

203
00:10:09.759 --> 00:10:12.519
<v Speaker 2>something light years wide and expect it to halt in

204
00:10:12.559 --> 00:10:13.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty years.

205
00:10:13.440 --> 00:10:16.039
<v Speaker 3>And that right there is the twenty year glitch. Yeah,

206
00:10:16.039 --> 00:10:18.799
<v Speaker 3>that is exactly where standard physics breaks down in this case.

207
00:10:18.879 --> 00:10:20.799
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so let's dig into that glitch. What is the

208
00:10:20.879 --> 00:10:22.600
<v Speaker 2>normal behavior supposed to.

209
00:10:22.519 --> 00:10:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Be to understand the anomaly? We have to establish that

210
00:10:25.799 --> 00:10:30.600
<v Speaker 3>baseline of normal behavior. Active glactic nuclei do vary in brightness,

211
00:10:30.799 --> 00:10:31.639
<v Speaker 3>that is known, right.

212
00:10:31.639 --> 00:10:33.159
<v Speaker 2>They aren't perfectly steady.

213
00:10:32.879 --> 00:10:36.639
<v Speaker 3>Because the flow of gas into the disc is turbulent

214
00:10:36.720 --> 00:10:41.039
<v Speaker 3>and clumpy. It's not a perfectly smooth stream. Because of this,

215
00:10:41.279 --> 00:10:44.000
<v Speaker 3>it is completely standard for an agn to vary in

216
00:10:44.039 --> 00:10:48.000
<v Speaker 3>its luminous output by about thirty percent over months or

217
00:10:48.039 --> 00:10:48.639
<v Speaker 3>even years.

218
00:10:48.759 --> 00:10:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so a thirty percent variation that makes sense to me.

219
00:10:51.399 --> 00:10:53.519
<v Speaker 2>That's like a flickering light bulb on your front porch.

220
00:10:53.720 --> 00:10:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Right.

221
00:10:54.399 --> 00:10:57.639
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes the current waivers a bit, the filament cools for

222
00:10:57.679 --> 00:11:00.000
<v Speaker 2>a microsecond, and it dims, then it brightens again.

223
00:11:00.279 --> 00:11:02.720
<v Speaker 3>A perfect analogy. That's just the normal breathing.

224
00:11:02.399 --> 00:11:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Of the accretion disc, but dropping to five percent of

225
00:11:05.039 --> 00:11:07.840
<v Speaker 2>its original brightness, dropping by a factor of twenty.

226
00:11:08.080 --> 00:11:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's different.

227
00:11:08.919 --> 00:11:11.120
<v Speaker 2>That is not a flicker. That's someone walking over and

228
00:11:11.240 --> 00:11:13.840
<v Speaker 2>violently ripping the power cable right out of the wall.

229
00:11:14.039 --> 00:11:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. And when astrophysicists build models to describe the physics

230
00:11:18.200 --> 00:11:22.919
<v Speaker 3>of these accretion discs, they deal with very specific mathematical time.

231
00:11:22.639 --> 00:11:24.159
<v Speaker 2>Scales, well kind of timescales.

232
00:11:24.320 --> 00:11:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, there is the dynamical time scale, which dictates how

233
00:11:27.519 --> 00:11:30.679
<v Speaker 3>fast things orbit the black hole. Okay, but more importantly

234
00:11:30.720 --> 00:11:33.799
<v Speaker 3>for this mystery, there is the viscous timescale.

235
00:11:33.879 --> 00:11:36.320
<v Speaker 2>This is like viscosity, like honey.

236
00:11:36.559 --> 00:11:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, it's the time it takes for mass to actually

237
00:11:40.039 --> 00:11:43.000
<v Speaker 3>flow through the friction of the disk and eventually fall

238
00:11:43.000 --> 00:11:43.919
<v Speaker 3>into the black hole.

239
00:11:44.080 --> 00:11:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Ah, I see.

240
00:11:45.399 --> 00:11:49.480
<v Speaker 3>And for a supermassive black hole, the viscous timescale is

241
00:11:49.559 --> 00:11:53.679
<v Speaker 3>immense changes in the fundamental mass secretion rate. The actual

242
00:11:53.759 --> 00:11:57.440
<v Speaker 3>fueling of the black hole should happen incredibly slowly, slowly

243
00:11:57.480 --> 00:12:00.240
<v Speaker 3>over tens of thousands of years at the absolute.

244
00:11:59.799 --> 00:12:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Mid So, meaning if you hypothetically cut off the fuel

245
00:12:03.240 --> 00:12:05.799
<v Speaker 2>supply at the outer edge of the disc today. Yes,

246
00:12:05.960 --> 00:12:08.200
<v Speaker 2>it should still take tens of thousands of years for

247
00:12:08.240 --> 00:12:09.919
<v Speaker 2>the inner part of the disk to finally drain out

248
00:12:09.919 --> 00:12:10.519
<v Speaker 2>and go dark.

249
00:12:10.759 --> 00:12:14.679
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the math simply does not allow an object containing

250
00:12:14.759 --> 00:12:18.039
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of millions of solar masses to shut down its

251
00:12:18.039 --> 00:12:20.120
<v Speaker 3>primary energy generation in twenty years.

252
00:12:20.399 --> 00:12:21.799
<v Speaker 2>It's just too fast.

253
00:12:21.600 --> 00:12:24.159
<v Speaker 3>Way too fast. To put it in geological terms, down

254
00:12:24.200 --> 00:12:27.519
<v Speaker 3>here on Earth, it is equivalent to watching the entire

255
00:12:27.879 --> 00:12:32.279
<v Speaker 3>Himalayan mountain range completely level out into a flat plane overnight. Wow,

256
00:12:32.440 --> 00:12:34.120
<v Speaker 3>just wake up and the mountains are gone.

257
00:12:34.200 --> 00:12:37.320
<v Speaker 2>And if a geologist saw the Himalays flatten overnight, their

258
00:12:37.360 --> 00:12:40.320
<v Speaker 2>first instinct would be to assume their equipment was broken.

259
00:12:40.679 --> 00:12:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. You check your sensors, right.

260
00:12:43.159 --> 00:12:46.360
<v Speaker 2>You can't just claim you broke standard physics without bringing absolute,

261
00:12:46.480 --> 00:12:47.879
<v Speaker 2>ironclad receipts.

262
00:12:47.960 --> 00:12:49.240
<v Speaker 3>And these researchers knew that.

263
00:12:49.639 --> 00:12:53.080
<v Speaker 2>So to prove this wasn't just some instrument error, astronomers

264
00:12:53.120 --> 00:12:57.120
<v Speaker 2>had to pull together an unprecedented multi generational investigation, and.

265
00:12:57.039 --> 00:13:01.120
<v Speaker 3>The methodology they used is just a masterclass in ovational astronomy.

266
00:13:01.399 --> 00:13:04.759
<v Speaker 2>Let's walk through that detective work, because it's fascinating.

267
00:13:04.240 --> 00:13:07.559
<v Speaker 3>It really is. The discovery wasn't a sudden eureka moment

268
00:13:07.960 --> 00:13:10.200
<v Speaker 3>at a telescope by piece where someone.

269
00:13:10.039 --> 00:13:12.559
<v Speaker 2>Gasped, you know, right, It's not like in the movies.

270
00:13:12.919 --> 00:13:16.519
<v Speaker 3>No, It relied on comparing immense digital data sets that

271
00:13:16.559 --> 00:13:20.080
<v Speaker 3>were separated by nearly two decades and then corroborating all

272
00:13:20.080 --> 00:13:21.679
<v Speaker 3>of that with historical archives.

273
00:13:21.759 --> 00:13:24.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so where does the timeline start.

274
00:13:24.720 --> 00:13:28.639
<v Speaker 3>The before picture? The baseline of this roaring bright agn

275
00:13:29.120 --> 00:13:31.919
<v Speaker 3>was established around two thousand and two by the Sloan

276
00:13:32.000 --> 00:13:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Digital Sky Survey.

277
00:13:33.080 --> 00:13:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, the SDSS, that's pretty legendary and astronomy circles right.

278
00:13:36.840 --> 00:13:39.559
<v Speaker 3>Oh, absolutely. It wasn't just looking at individual objects. It

279
00:13:39.679 --> 00:13:43.840
<v Speaker 3>essentially created one of the first highly detailed, massive three

280
00:13:43.960 --> 00:13:46.200
<v Speaker 3>D maps of the observable universe.

281
00:13:46.039 --> 00:13:49.399
<v Speaker 2>Scanning massive swaths of the sky night after night.

282
00:13:49.480 --> 00:13:52.039
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, and it provided a vital benchmark for what the

283
00:13:52.039 --> 00:13:53.879
<v Speaker 3>sky looked like at the turn of the millennium.

284
00:13:54.000 --> 00:13:57.399
<v Speaker 2>Right, But obviously, astronomy technology evolves incredibly rapidly.

285
00:13:57.559 --> 00:14:00.360
<v Speaker 3>It does. Fast forward to twenty eighteen and re searchers

286
00:14:00.360 --> 00:14:03.600
<v Speaker 3>were using the hypersuprimecam the HC right mounted on the

287
00:14:03.639 --> 00:14:07.360
<v Speaker 3>super Bru telescope in Hawaii. The HSC uses these highly

288
00:14:07.399 --> 00:14:11.559
<v Speaker 3>advanced charge coupled devices that are far, far more sensitive

289
00:14:11.600 --> 00:14:13.639
<v Speaker 3>than what was available back in two thousand and two.

290
00:14:13.480 --> 00:14:14.799
<v Speaker 2>So they get a much crisper look.

291
00:14:15.279 --> 00:14:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. So this international collaboration, which by the way, required

292
00:14:19.159 --> 00:14:25.279
<v Speaker 3>coordinating massive teams across Japan, Germany and Spain just to

293
00:14:25.320 --> 00:14:27.639
<v Speaker 3>process the sheer volume of data.

294
00:14:27.759 --> 00:14:29.879
<v Speaker 2>Just moving the hard drives must have been a nightmare.

295
00:14:29.919 --> 00:14:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Seriously. But when they compared the twenty eighteen HSC images

296
00:14:34.039 --> 00:14:37.600
<v Speaker 3>to the two thousand and two SDSS data, the discrepancy

297
00:14:37.639 --> 00:14:39.840
<v Speaker 3>in Jay zero two eighteen was glaring.

298
00:14:40.120 --> 00:14:41.759
<v Speaker 2>The light had simply vanished.

299
00:14:41.759 --> 00:14:42.519
<v Speaker 3>It is just gone.

300
00:14:42.559 --> 00:14:45.720
<v Speaker 2>But seeing a discrepancy between two digital surveys is you know,

301
00:14:45.879 --> 00:14:48.080
<v Speaker 2>it's a great start, but it's not enough to rewrite

302
00:14:48.080 --> 00:14:48.559
<v Speaker 2>the text.

303
00:14:48.399 --> 00:14:50.960
<v Speaker 3>Posts and nave and close. You need confirmation, right.

304
00:14:50.879 --> 00:14:53.279
<v Speaker 2>So they launched this massive follow up campaign.

305
00:14:53.320 --> 00:14:54.600
<v Speaker 3>They threw everything they had at it.

306
00:14:54.600 --> 00:14:57.399
<v Speaker 2>They brought in the Grand Telescopeio Canarias. They brought in

307
00:14:57.440 --> 00:15:02.600
<v Speaker 2>the WMCC Observatory for new optical and near infrared observations. Yeah,

308
00:15:02.639 --> 00:15:04.919
<v Speaker 2>they pulled in X ray data, they pulled in radio

309
00:15:05.000 --> 00:15:05.919
<v Speaker 2>wave data.

310
00:15:05.720 --> 00:15:06.840
<v Speaker 3>All across the spectrum.

311
00:15:06.879 --> 00:15:09.279
<v Speaker 2>And then my absolute favorite part, They went into the

312
00:15:09.320 --> 00:15:14.200
<v Speaker 2>physical vaults. Yes, the archival sleuthing scientists literally pulled out

313
00:15:14.240 --> 00:15:18.279
<v Speaker 2>physical photographic plates taken roughly seventy years ago to build

314
00:15:18.279 --> 00:15:20.679
<v Speaker 2>a complete historical timeline of this galaxy.

315
00:15:21.039 --> 00:15:23.879
<v Speaker 3>It really is a stunning validation of the importance of

316
00:15:23.960 --> 00:15:25.519
<v Speaker 3>preserving archival data.

317
00:15:25.559 --> 00:15:28.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean seventy years ago. We are talking about chemical.

318
00:15:28.360 --> 00:15:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Emulsions, long before digital sensors ever existed. But those old

319
00:15:33.000 --> 00:15:36.879
<v Speaker 3>plates allowed the team to confirm that this sudden dimming

320
00:15:37.120 --> 00:15:40.519
<v Speaker 3>wasn't just a return to some historical norm ah Okay,

321
00:15:40.639 --> 00:15:42.879
<v Speaker 3>it allowed them to track the long term behavior of

322
00:15:42.919 --> 00:15:46.960
<v Speaker 3>the agn over decades and definitively confirmed that the twenty

323
00:15:47.039 --> 00:15:51.600
<v Speaker 3>year drop was a genuine, unprecedented anomaly in the object's history.

324
00:15:51.679 --> 00:15:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, hold on, I have to push back on the

325
00:15:53.360 --> 00:15:56.320
<v Speaker 2>methodology here for a second. Sure, I love the idea

326
00:15:56.480 --> 00:15:59.960
<v Speaker 2>of modern astronomers dusting off seventy year old physical place,

327
00:16:00.720 --> 00:16:02.919
<v Speaker 2>but you're telling me a piece of glass coded in

328
00:16:03.000 --> 00:16:06.159
<v Speaker 2>chemicals from the nineteen fifties is being used to verify

329
00:16:06.279 --> 00:16:08.519
<v Speaker 2>a ten billion year old cosmic anomaly.

330
00:16:08.720 --> 00:16:10.039
<v Speaker 3>That is exactly what I'm telling you.

331
00:16:10.240 --> 00:16:12.399
<v Speaker 2>But how do we know the emulsion on those plates

332
00:16:12.440 --> 00:16:15.480
<v Speaker 2>hasn't just degraded over the decades. How can we trust

333
00:16:15.519 --> 00:16:17.559
<v Speaker 2>an old piece of glass sitting in a drawer to

334
00:16:17.679 --> 00:16:19.879
<v Speaker 2>rewrite modern astrophysics.

335
00:16:20.000 --> 00:16:23.000
<v Speaker 3>It is a very valid skepticism, and it's something astronomers

336
00:16:23.080 --> 00:16:25.919
<v Speaker 3>actively account for through rigorous calibration.

337
00:16:26.320 --> 00:16:29.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, how do they calibrate a seventy year old photo.

338
00:16:29.879 --> 00:16:32.559
<v Speaker 3>Well, you don't just look at the single galaxy on

339
00:16:32.600 --> 00:16:35.720
<v Speaker 3>the glass plate in isolation. You look at the entire

340
00:16:35.799 --> 00:16:39.360
<v Speaker 3>field of view captured on that piece of glass. Okay,

341
00:16:39.639 --> 00:16:42.919
<v Speaker 3>you measure the brightness of Jay zero two eighteen against

342
00:16:42.919 --> 00:16:47.240
<v Speaker 3>the brightness of dozens of steady, non variable stars they

343
00:16:47.320 --> 00:16:49.840
<v Speaker 3>were captured on that exact same photographic plate.

344
00:16:50.120 --> 00:16:51.519
<v Speaker 2>Oh I see right.

345
00:16:51.600 --> 00:16:55.360
<v Speaker 3>So if the chemical emulsion simply degraded over time, the

346
00:16:55.440 --> 00:16:57.360
<v Speaker 3>reference stars would also look dimmer to us.

347
00:16:57.399 --> 00:16:58.919
<v Speaker 2>Now, that is brilliant.

348
00:16:59.039 --> 00:17:02.120
<v Speaker 3>By measuring the relative brightness between the galaxy and those

349
00:17:02.159 --> 00:17:05.680
<v Speaker 3>steady stars, the chemical degradation of the physical plate is

350
00:17:05.759 --> 00:17:07.319
<v Speaker 3>completely factored out of the equation.

351
00:17:07.480 --> 00:17:10.079
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that makes perfect sense. The steady stars act as

352
00:17:10.079 --> 00:17:12.680
<v Speaker 2>an internal control group for the plate's physical condition.

353
00:17:12.839 --> 00:17:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. It's very clever, it is.

354
00:17:14.920 --> 00:17:16.799
<v Speaker 2>But let's look at the modern follow up data they

355
00:17:16.839 --> 00:17:19.000
<v Speaker 2>gather because I have another question there. Shoot, why did

356
00:17:19.000 --> 00:17:22.359
<v Speaker 2>they need radio X ray and optical data? I mean,

357
00:17:22.359 --> 00:17:25.559
<v Speaker 2>if the light went out, shouldn't a regular standard visible

358
00:17:25.599 --> 00:17:28.559
<v Speaker 2>light telescope be enough to tell us that? Why throw

359
00:17:28.599 --> 00:17:31.000
<v Speaker 2>the entire electromagnetic spectrum of the problem.

360
00:17:31.079 --> 00:17:35.359
<v Speaker 3>Because different wavelengths of light review entirely different physical mechanisms

361
00:17:35.400 --> 00:17:37.960
<v Speaker 3>within the ag in itself. Okay, explain that if you

362
00:17:38.000 --> 00:17:41.079
<v Speaker 3>only look at visible light the optical stuff, you miss

363
00:17:41.160 --> 00:17:44.039
<v Speaker 3>the vast majority of the actual physics going on. Yeah,

364
00:17:44.079 --> 00:17:48.559
<v Speaker 3>An active glyphic nucleus is a complex layered ecosystem.

365
00:17:48.680 --> 00:17:50.240
<v Speaker 2>It's not just one glowing ball.

366
00:17:50.720 --> 00:17:54.599
<v Speaker 3>No, it is governed by extreme thermal gradients. So the

367
00:17:54.599 --> 00:17:57.759
<v Speaker 3>inner region right next to the black hole is the hottest.

368
00:17:57.359 --> 00:18:00.359
<v Speaker 2>Part, right where the friction is crazy exactly.

369
00:18:00.039 --> 00:18:02.839
<v Speaker 3>Because it's so hot, it produces high energy short wavelength

370
00:18:02.880 --> 00:18:03.160
<v Speaker 3>X ray.

371
00:18:03.319 --> 00:18:05.000
<v Speaker 2>So it's kind of like the blue flame on a

372
00:18:05.000 --> 00:18:07.680
<v Speaker 2>blowtorch being hotter than the yellow flame on a candle.

373
00:18:07.839 --> 00:18:11.279
<v Speaker 3>That is a fantastic parallel. Yes, Okay, Then the swirling

374
00:18:11.319 --> 00:18:14.839
<v Speaker 3>gas further out from the center is slightly cooler, relatively speaking,

375
00:18:15.160 --> 00:18:17.400
<v Speaker 3>so that produces your optical and ultraviolet light.

376
00:18:17.599 --> 00:18:19.559
<v Speaker 2>So that's the yellow flame, right.

377
00:18:19.359 --> 00:18:21.759
<v Speaker 3>And then even further away from the black hole, you

378
00:18:21.839 --> 00:18:25.920
<v Speaker 3>have this massive torus, essentially a giant donut shape of

379
00:18:25.960 --> 00:18:29.039
<v Speaker 3>cosmic dust, a dust donut, a dust donut, and that

380
00:18:29.160 --> 00:18:32.720
<v Speaker 3>dust actually absorbs the inner light and reradiates it as

381
00:18:32.799 --> 00:18:34.359
<v Speaker 3>long wavelength infrared heat.

382
00:18:34.599 --> 00:18:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, So you have X rays in the middle,

383
00:18:36.880 --> 00:18:39.799
<v Speaker 2>optical in the middle ring, and infrared on the outer edge.

384
00:18:39.880 --> 00:18:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Phcisely. So by looking at all these different wavelengths, researchers

385
00:18:43.240 --> 00:18:45.200
<v Speaker 3>aren't just checking to see if the object as a

386
00:18:45.200 --> 00:18:46.279
<v Speaker 3>whole got darker.

387
00:18:46.640 --> 00:18:49.880
<v Speaker 2>They are diagnosing which specific parts of the engine.

388
00:18:49.599 --> 00:18:53.799
<v Speaker 3>Broke down exactly. They're checking the spark plugs, the fuel line, everything.

389
00:18:53.559 --> 00:18:57.119
<v Speaker 2>And more importantly, using those different wavelengths was the only

390
00:18:57.200 --> 00:19:01.720
<v Speaker 2>way to rule out the absolute most common suspect and astronomical.

391
00:19:01.000 --> 00:19:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Mysteries, which is cosmic dust.

392
00:19:03.240 --> 00:19:08.079
<v Speaker 2>Exactly because whenever something gets unexpectedly dim in space, it

393
00:19:08.119 --> 00:19:10.720
<v Speaker 2>feels like the first instinct is always did a giant

394
00:19:10.759 --> 00:19:12.960
<v Speaker 2>cloud of dust just float in front of it?

395
00:19:12.960 --> 00:19:15.759
<v Speaker 3>It is the most logical assumption based on Okham's razor.

396
00:19:16.079 --> 00:19:20.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, space is incredibly dusty, right, Galaxies are filled

397
00:19:20.960 --> 00:19:24.920
<v Speaker 3>with these immense, sweeping clouds of silicates and carbonaceous grains

398
00:19:24.960 --> 00:19:27.039
<v Speaker 3>that were forged in the depths of older stars.

399
00:19:27.119 --> 00:19:29.079
<v Speaker 2>It's very crowded, very so.

400
00:19:29.240 --> 00:19:31.160
<v Speaker 3>The most obvious answer to the question why did the

401
00:19:31.200 --> 00:19:34.559
<v Speaker 3>light suddenly get dark is simply something got in the.

402
00:19:34.480 --> 00:19:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Way, the hypothesis being that a dense cloud of interstellar

403
00:19:38.559 --> 00:19:41.599
<v Speaker 2>dust basically just drifted across our line of sight.

404
00:19:41.599 --> 00:19:46.359
<v Speaker 3>Right interposing itself between our telescopes on Earth and the

405
00:19:46.440 --> 00:19:49.640
<v Speaker 3>accretion disc ten billion light years away.

406
00:19:50.000 --> 00:19:52.480
<v Speaker 2>And if that happened, it's not like the projector broke.

407
00:19:52.519 --> 00:19:54.480
<v Speaker 2>It's like someone just walked in front of the projector,

408
00:19:54.519 --> 00:19:55.400
<v Speaker 2>blocking the movie.

409
00:19:55.559 --> 00:19:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the engine itself would still be chugging along perfectly fine.

410
00:19:59.559 --> 00:20:01.559
<v Speaker 3>It would just be hidden behind a curtain of dust.

411
00:20:01.759 --> 00:20:03.720
<v Speaker 2>But they proved it wasn't dust.

412
00:20:03.920 --> 00:20:05.319
<v Speaker 3>They absolutely did. So.

413
00:20:05.359 --> 00:20:10.559
<v Speaker 2>How does looking at different wavelengths dismantle the dust cloud theory?

414
00:20:11.240 --> 00:20:14.599
<v Speaker 3>It comes down to the physics of scattering. Scattering, specifically,

415
00:20:14.599 --> 00:20:17.599
<v Speaker 3>how the physical size of a light wavelength interacts with

416
00:20:17.640 --> 00:20:19.160
<v Speaker 3>the physical size of a dust particle.

417
00:20:19.240 --> 00:20:20.519
<v Speaker 2>Okay, break that down for me.

418
00:20:21.119 --> 00:20:25.319
<v Speaker 3>Cosmic dust particles are incredibly tiny, and visible optical light

419
00:20:25.599 --> 00:20:29.319
<v Speaker 3>has very short wavelengths. When those short, tightly packed wavelengths

420
00:20:29.400 --> 00:20:32.839
<v Speaker 3>hidden the tiny dust particles. They scatter like hitting a

421
00:20:32.880 --> 00:20:35.960
<v Speaker 3>wall exactly. The light bounces off in different directions and

422
00:20:36.000 --> 00:20:39.200
<v Speaker 3>it never reaches their telescopes. That's why dust blocks visible

423
00:20:39.279 --> 00:20:40.000
<v Speaker 3>light so well.

424
00:20:40.200 --> 00:20:42.640
<v Speaker 2>But infrared light behaves.

425
00:20:42.240 --> 00:20:47.599
<v Speaker 3>Differently, completely differently. Infrared light has a much much longer wavelength. Okay,

426
00:20:47.759 --> 00:20:51.160
<v Speaker 3>because the waves are physically longer than the dust particles themselves,

427
00:20:51.480 --> 00:20:56.359
<v Speaker 3>they don't scatter efficiently. The infrared light essentially bypasses the

428
00:20:56.400 --> 00:20:57.240
<v Speaker 3>dust entirely.

429
00:20:57.319 --> 00:21:00.759
<v Speaker 2>It just pierces straight through, yes, right.

430
00:21:00.680 --> 00:21:04.799
<v Speaker 3>Through dense clouds that would completely block visible light.

431
00:21:05.000 --> 00:21:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's try to ground this with an analogy, because I

432
00:21:06.960 --> 00:21:08.359
<v Speaker 2>want to make sure I'm visualizing this right.

433
00:21:08.440 --> 00:21:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Go for it.

434
00:21:09.000 --> 00:21:11.599
<v Speaker 2>It's like standing on a pier looking at the ocean. Okay,

435
00:21:11.880 --> 00:21:16.240
<v Speaker 2>the massive long ocean swells, those would represent the infrared waves.

436
00:21:16.240 --> 00:21:18.880
<v Speaker 2>They roll right past the wooden pilings of the pier

437
00:21:18.960 --> 00:21:21.720
<v Speaker 2>like they aren't even there. Yes, But the tiny choppy

438
00:21:21.799 --> 00:21:26.240
<v Speaker 2>ripples on the surface representing the short optical wavelengths, those

439
00:21:26.319 --> 00:21:28.799
<v Speaker 2>smash into the wood and scatter in all directions.

440
00:21:28.960 --> 00:21:32.400
<v Speaker 3>That perfectly captures the physics of wavelength depended scattering.

441
00:21:32.480 --> 00:21:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I love that, Okay, So applying that to the galaxy.

442
00:21:35.119 --> 00:21:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Right, If a dust cloud had just drifted in front

443
00:21:38.440 --> 00:21:42.079
<v Speaker 3>of JO two one eight, the short wavelength visible light

444
00:21:42.160 --> 00:21:44.839
<v Speaker 3>would have crashed into the dust and scattered.

445
00:21:44.599 --> 00:21:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Which would cause a massive drop in the optical brightness

446
00:21:47.640 --> 00:21:49.119
<v Speaker 2>we see on Earth exactly.

447
00:21:49.680 --> 00:21:52.640
<v Speaker 3>But the long wavelength infrared light, which is pouring out

448
00:21:52.680 --> 00:21:56.640
<v Speaker 3>of that hot, dusty torus surrounding the agn that should

449
00:21:56.640 --> 00:21:58.680
<v Speaker 3>have rolled right past the obstruction.

450
00:21:58.400 --> 00:22:02.000
<v Speaker 2>So the infrared should have remained relilatively steady in our observations.

451
00:22:02.119 --> 00:22:04.400
<v Speaker 3>It should have if it was just dust.

452
00:22:04.720 --> 00:22:08.559
<v Speaker 2>But when the researchers actually analyzed the data across the spectrum,

453
00:22:08.839 --> 00:22:11.839
<v Speaker 2>they found that both the optical light and the infrared

454
00:22:11.920 --> 00:22:15.079
<v Speaker 2>light dropped dramatically at the exact same time.

455
00:22:15.039 --> 00:22:19.400
<v Speaker 3>And that synchronized drop completely destroys the dust cloud hypothesis.

456
00:22:19.640 --> 00:22:21.319
<v Speaker 2>Because dust can't block.

457
00:22:21.079 --> 00:22:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Infrared exactly, a physical dust obstruction cannot hide the infrared

458
00:22:25.799 --> 00:22:29.599
<v Speaker 3>signature of an active accretion disk. Because the infrared light

459
00:22:29.720 --> 00:22:32.880
<v Speaker 3>vanished alongside the optical light, the scientists were backed into

460
00:22:32.880 --> 00:22:33.359
<v Speaker 3>a corner.

461
00:22:33.440 --> 00:22:36.920
<v Speaker 2>They were left with only one terrifyingly fast conclusion regarding

462
00:22:36.920 --> 00:22:38.400
<v Speaker 2>the physical state of the galaxy.

463
00:22:38.559 --> 00:22:40.119
<v Speaker 3>Right, the engine didn't get covered up.

464
00:22:40.160 --> 00:22:41.079
<v Speaker 2>The engine starved.

465
00:22:41.279 --> 00:22:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the fuel shut down, we shift from a mystery

466
00:22:44.720 --> 00:22:48.359
<v Speaker 3>of missing light to a fundamental breakdown of cosmic mechanics.

467
00:22:48.559 --> 00:22:50.799
<v Speaker 2>So what did the data tell them about the fuel supply?

468
00:22:52.079 --> 00:22:56.799
<v Speaker 3>By feeding these simultaneous multi wavelength drops into complex theoretical models,

469
00:22:57.759 --> 00:23:01.759
<v Speaker 3>the researchers determined that the mass s acrete rate, the

470
00:23:01.799 --> 00:23:05.519
<v Speaker 3>actual physical flow of plasma falling into the black hole plummeted.

471
00:23:05.720 --> 00:23:08.880
<v Speaker 3>How far down it dropped to about one fiftieth of

472
00:23:08.880 --> 00:23:09.759
<v Speaker 3>its previous level.

473
00:23:09.839 --> 00:23:13.039
<v Speaker 2>One fiftieth Yeah, so it essentially dropped to two percent

474
00:23:13.119 --> 00:23:16.599
<v Speaker 2>of its original fuel intake, its fusmiums. And the most

475
00:23:16.640 --> 00:23:20.000
<v Speaker 2>shocking part here has to be the timeline. This starvation

476
00:23:20.119 --> 00:23:23.680
<v Speaker 2>didn't take tens of thousands of years, like that viscous

477
00:23:23.720 --> 00:23:25.680
<v Speaker 2>timescale math suggests it should.

478
00:23:25.960 --> 00:23:26.599
<v Speaker 3>No, it didn't.

479
00:23:26.720 --> 00:23:28.279
<v Speaker 2>It happened in a mere seven years.

480
00:23:28.440 --> 00:23:32.319
<v Speaker 3>Seven years, which is an infinitesimally small fraction of time

481
00:23:32.359 --> 00:23:33.640
<v Speaker 3>in astrophysics, right.

482
00:23:33.519 --> 00:23:35.519
<v Speaker 2>I mean seven years. That's less time than it takes

483
00:23:35.519 --> 00:23:37.640
<v Speaker 2>to get a medical degree, it really is. And to

484
00:23:37.640 --> 00:23:42.240
<v Speaker 2>go from a roaring galaxy illuminating cosmic furnace to sheer

485
00:23:42.279 --> 00:23:44.799
<v Speaker 2>starvation mode in just seven years.

486
00:23:44.559 --> 00:23:48.480
<v Speaker 3>It indicates a catastrophic instantaneous phase change in the accretion

487
00:23:48.640 --> 00:23:50.119
<v Speaker 3>disks physical structure.

488
00:23:50.359 --> 00:23:53.119
<v Speaker 2>But if the fuel supply just vanished, where did all

489
00:23:53.119 --> 00:23:55.720
<v Speaker 2>that mass go? I mean, we're talking about a vortex

490
00:23:55.720 --> 00:23:59.720
<v Speaker 2>of superheated plasma, likely millions of times more massive than

491
00:23:59.720 --> 00:24:01.960
<v Speaker 2>the Earth Earth. It can't just disappear.

492
00:24:02.160 --> 00:24:06.799
<v Speaker 3>And that is the lingering million dollar question keeping theoretical

493
00:24:06.839 --> 00:24:10.400
<v Speaker 3>physicists awake at night. I bet, because we know an

494
00:24:10.400 --> 00:24:14.759
<v Speaker 3>accretion disc is maintained by a delicate balance of extreme forces.

495
00:24:14.920 --> 00:24:16.599
<v Speaker 2>What forces, well, the I mense.

496
00:24:16.400 --> 00:24:19.839
<v Speaker 3>Gravity of the supermassive black hole is constantly trying to

497
00:24:19.920 --> 00:24:23.559
<v Speaker 3>crush all that gas inward, right But the incredible heat

498
00:24:23.640 --> 00:24:28.079
<v Speaker 3>generated by the friction creates intense radiation pressure, and that

499
00:24:28.200 --> 00:24:31.920
<v Speaker 3>radiation pressure is pushing outward. So the disk exists in

500
00:24:31.920 --> 00:24:35.640
<v Speaker 3>this fragile balance between gravity pulling in and light pushing out.

501
00:24:36.119 --> 00:24:38.519
<v Speaker 3>It's a concept closely related to the Eddington limit.

502
00:24:38.599 --> 00:24:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So if the fuel supply drops to one fiftieth,

503
00:24:41.599 --> 00:24:46.480
<v Speaker 2>that delicate balance collapses instantly. The outward radiation pressure basically.

504
00:24:46.200 --> 00:24:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Dies exactly and exactly what happens next is heavily debated

505
00:24:49.880 --> 00:24:50.319
<v Speaker 3>in the field.

506
00:24:50.400 --> 00:24:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Right now, what are the main theories.

507
00:24:52.079 --> 00:24:55.359
<v Speaker 3>One major theory is that the disc might transition into

508
00:24:55.480 --> 00:25:00.799
<v Speaker 3>what physicists call a radiatively inefficient accretion flow or.

509
00:25:00.720 --> 00:25:03.279
<v Speaker 2>A riaf riaf.

510
00:25:03.480 --> 00:25:06.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. In this state, the plasma basically becomes so diffuse

511
00:25:07.039 --> 00:25:10.039
<v Speaker 3>that it can no longer cool itself efficiently by emitting light.

512
00:25:10.160 --> 00:25:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so it stops glowing, right.

513
00:25:11.799 --> 00:25:14.519
<v Speaker 3>The energy gets trapped as thermal heat, and the disc

514
00:25:14.640 --> 00:25:17.960
<v Speaker 3>puffs up into a faint, practically invisible sphere of gas

515
00:25:18.359 --> 00:25:20.480
<v Speaker 3>rather than a brilliant, glowing whirlpool.

516
00:25:20.559 --> 00:25:22.799
<v Speaker 2>But what triggers that drop in the fuel in the

517
00:25:22.799 --> 00:25:25.160
<v Speaker 2>first place? How do you lose the flow so quickly?

518
00:25:25.240 --> 00:25:27.160
<v Speaker 3>That's the real mystery, because it can't be.

519
00:25:27.160 --> 00:25:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Like pulling a plug in a bathtub that I employs

520
00:25:29.440 --> 00:25:32.880
<v Speaker 2>gravity just smoothly drains the water. But we are talking

521
00:25:32.960 --> 00:25:35.559
<v Speaker 2>about plasma moving at relativistic speeds, right.

522
00:25:35.680 --> 00:25:38.519
<v Speaker 3>A better way to visualize it is imagine a massive

523
00:25:38.720 --> 00:25:41.839
<v Speaker 3>high speed highway where suddenly the structural integrity of the

524
00:25:41.880 --> 00:25:43.799
<v Speaker 3>bridge just completely fails.

525
00:25:43.880 --> 00:25:44.440
<v Speaker 2>It trumbles.

526
00:25:44.519 --> 00:25:46.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. The plasma is being held in its orbit by

527
00:25:46.559 --> 00:25:49.720
<v Speaker 3>magnetic fields and angular momentum. So one theory is a

528
00:25:49.759 --> 00:25:53.680
<v Speaker 3>massive magnetic anomaly, likewise like a sudden inversion or snapping

529
00:25:54.079 --> 00:25:57.960
<v Speaker 3>of the magnetic field lines. This could instantly strip the

530
00:25:58.000 --> 00:26:00.200
<v Speaker 3>inner regions of the disk of all their angular.

531
00:26:00.119 --> 00:26:03.359
<v Speaker 2>Momentum, and without angular momentum keeping it in orbit, essentially

532
00:26:03.359 --> 00:26:07.079
<v Speaker 2>spinning around, the plasma has nothing fighting gravity anymore.

533
00:26:07.119 --> 00:26:10.599
<v Speaker 3>The structural support vanishes, and a massive chunk of the

534
00:26:10.599 --> 00:26:16.200
<v Speaker 3>inner disc simply plunges into the event horizon almost instantaneously. Wow,

535
00:26:16.359 --> 00:26:18.640
<v Speaker 3>leaving an empty, starved cavity behind.

536
00:26:18.799 --> 00:26:20.000
<v Speaker 2>That is terrifying.

537
00:26:20.079 --> 00:26:23.680
<v Speaker 3>It gets wilder. Another theory suggests the exact opposite extreme,

538
00:26:23.799 --> 00:26:27.240
<v Speaker 3>which is that the energy generated by the accretion process

539
00:26:27.319 --> 00:26:32.119
<v Speaker 3>briefly surged, creating these powerful magnetically driven.

540
00:26:31.799 --> 00:26:33.799
<v Speaker 2>Winds winds in space.

541
00:26:33.559 --> 00:26:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Cosmic winds, And these winds were so intense they literally

542
00:26:36.920 --> 00:26:39.000
<v Speaker 3>blew the inner region of the disc apart.

543
00:26:38.880 --> 00:26:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Just blasted it away.

544
00:26:40.160 --> 00:26:44.119
<v Speaker 3>Exactly sweeping the gas outward and completely severing the fuel

545
00:26:44.160 --> 00:26:45.079
<v Speaker 3>line to the black hole.

546
00:26:45.279 --> 00:26:48.279
<v Speaker 2>I mean, both of those scenarios sound incredibly violent.

547
00:26:48.319 --> 00:26:52.359
<v Speaker 3>They are exceedingly violent. But the truth is, the specific

548
00:26:52.400 --> 00:26:55.359
<v Speaker 3>mechanism capable of causing a gas supply of this magnitude

549
00:26:55.359 --> 00:26:58.680
<v Speaker 3>to shut off in seven years remains a theoretical ghost.

550
00:26:58.839 --> 00:26:59.480
<v Speaker 2>We just don't know.

551
00:26:59.759 --> 00:27:03.440
<v Speaker 3>We have observed the undeniable aftermath. The lights are off,

552
00:27:04.319 --> 00:27:07.160
<v Speaker 3>but the physical catalyst is still hiding in the dark.

553
00:27:07.359 --> 00:27:10.680
<v Speaker 2>And the fact that our current standard models cannot explain

554
00:27:10.839 --> 00:27:14.200
<v Speaker 2>how a supermassive black hole goes on a sudden starvation

555
00:27:14.400 --> 00:27:18.160
<v Speaker 2>diet in seven years. It's forcing a complete rethink of

556
00:27:18.200 --> 00:27:19.559
<v Speaker 2>cosmic evolution, isn't it.

557
00:27:19.599 --> 00:27:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Absolutely, this discovery isn't just a quirky footnote in

558
00:27:23.240 --> 00:27:28.480
<v Speaker 3>some journal. It is actively rewriting the future of astrophysics.

559
00:27:27.720 --> 00:27:32.359
<v Speaker 2>Because it upends that universally accepted view of slow gradual

560
00:27:32.519 --> 00:27:34.480
<v Speaker 2>agn evolution completely.

561
00:27:34.799 --> 00:27:37.319
<v Speaker 3>One of the co authors of the study, Toshihiro Kawaguchi,

562
00:27:37.599 --> 00:27:41.039
<v Speaker 3>pointed out that this rapid variability simply cannot be explained

563
00:27:41.079 --> 00:27:42.200
<v Speaker 3>by standard models.

564
00:27:42.519 --> 00:27:45.519
<v Speaker 2>Our mathematics literally do not account for a massive accretion

565
00:27:45.640 --> 00:27:47.160
<v Speaker 2>disc graining in under a decade.

566
00:27:47.240 --> 00:27:48.960
<v Speaker 3>No, the math says, it's impossible.

567
00:27:49.079 --> 00:27:51.680
<v Speaker 2>I imagine that for a theoretical physicist, though, having your

568
00:27:51.720 --> 00:27:54.599
<v Speaker 2>standard model's break is actually a really thrilling moment.

569
00:27:54.720 --> 00:27:56.319
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it's the best day of your life. Right.

570
00:27:56.640 --> 00:27:59.160
<v Speaker 2>It means there's an entirely new layer of physics waiting

571
00:27:59.200 --> 00:27:59.960
<v Speaker 2>to be discovered.

572
00:28:00.240 --> 00:28:03.359
<v Speaker 3>Science advances when we find the anomaly. When we find

573
00:28:03.400 --> 00:28:06.039
<v Speaker 3>the thing that shouldn't exist but undeniably.

574
00:28:05.400 --> 00:28:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Does, and Jay zero two one teen is that anomaly exactly.

575
00:28:09.680 --> 00:28:13.319
<v Speaker 3>It now serves as a vital test case. Theoretical physicists

576
00:28:13.359 --> 00:28:14.519
<v Speaker 3>have a new goalpost.

577
00:28:14.599 --> 00:28:15.359
<v Speaker 2>What's the goalpost?

578
00:28:15.440 --> 00:28:18.240
<v Speaker 3>They must design a mathematical model of an accretion disk

579
00:28:18.720 --> 00:28:22.359
<v Speaker 3>that actually allows for a catastrophic structural failure in seven

580
00:28:22.440 --> 00:28:27.839
<v Speaker 3>years without violating the fundamental laws of thermodynamics.

581
00:28:27.079 --> 00:28:29.279
<v Speaker 2>Which is going to be incredibly difficult.

582
00:28:29.319 --> 00:28:30.759
<v Speaker 3>It's a huge challenge.

583
00:28:30.839 --> 00:28:35.599
<v Speaker 2>It's like geology, assuming all mountains erode slowly over millions

584
00:28:35.640 --> 00:28:38.000
<v Speaker 2>of years, right right, and then setting up a camera

585
00:28:38.160 --> 00:28:41.440
<v Speaker 2>and watching one specific mountain just completely flatten out on

586
00:28:41.440 --> 00:28:44.359
<v Speaker 2>a Tuesday afternoon. Yes, we don't just quit science and

587
00:28:44.400 --> 00:28:47.160
<v Speaker 2>throw our hands up. We realize we need completely new

588
00:28:47.200 --> 00:28:49.400
<v Speaker 2>physics to explain the Tuesday Mountain.

589
00:28:49.519 --> 00:28:51.640
<v Speaker 3>I love that the Tuesday Mountain and the search for

590
00:28:51.680 --> 00:28:55.079
<v Speaker 3>more of these Tuesday mountains is already defining the next

591
00:28:55.200 --> 00:28:56.920
<v Speaker 3>era of observational.

592
00:28:56.359 --> 00:28:58.279
<v Speaker 2>Astronomy because we have to find out if this is

593
00:28:58.319 --> 00:29:01.119
<v Speaker 2>a one off, freak accident or pattern exactly.

594
00:29:01.440 --> 00:29:04.759
<v Speaker 3>Tomoki Morrikuma, who led the study, he really emphasized the

595
00:29:04.759 --> 00:29:07.319
<v Speaker 3>critical shift happening right now with wide field.

596
00:29:07.039 --> 00:29:10.039
<v Speaker 2>Surveys right, the way we look at the sky is changing.

597
00:29:10.400 --> 00:29:14.359
<v Speaker 3>It is for centuries. Astronomy was basically about pointing a

598
00:29:14.400 --> 00:29:17.960
<v Speaker 3>telescope at one specific, tiny key hole in the sky

599
00:29:18.559 --> 00:29:19.599
<v Speaker 3>and studying.

600
00:29:19.160 --> 00:29:22.480
<v Speaker 2>It deeply, right, looking at one star or one galaxy

601
00:29:22.519 --> 00:29:23.119
<v Speaker 2>for hours.

602
00:29:23.160 --> 00:29:26.440
<v Speaker 3>But the problem is you remain completely blind to the

603
00:29:26.559 --> 00:29:28.839
<v Speaker 3>ninety nine point nine percent of the sky you aren't

604
00:29:28.839 --> 00:29:29.319
<v Speaker 3>looking at.

605
00:29:29.359 --> 00:29:31.880
<v Speaker 2>But with new tools like the hypersuprime cam and all

606
00:29:31.920 --> 00:29:34.720
<v Speaker 2>these upcoming facilities that are designed to map the entire

607
00:29:34.759 --> 00:29:36.319
<v Speaker 2>sky every few nights, we.

608
00:29:36.240 --> 00:29:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Are shifting from taking static polaroids to basically recording a

609
00:29:40.519 --> 00:29:42.359
<v Speaker 3>continuous dynamic movie of.

610
00:29:42.359 --> 00:29:44.079
<v Speaker 2>The universe, which is incredible.

611
00:29:44.200 --> 00:29:47.599
<v Speaker 3>That wide field capability is literally the only reason we

612
00:29:47.720 --> 00:29:50.880
<v Speaker 3>caught this seven year shut down in j zero two eighteen.

613
00:29:50.599 --> 00:29:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Because if you only look at a galaxy once a century,

614
00:29:53.240 --> 00:29:56.759
<v Speaker 2>you will miss these rapid, fleeting phase changes entirely.

615
00:29:56.960 --> 00:29:58.480
<v Speaker 3>You never even know they happen.

616
00:29:58.359 --> 00:30:01.319
<v Speaker 2>Which raises a massive question on what if Jay zero

617
00:30:01.359 --> 00:30:04.000
<v Speaker 2>two on you isn't a freak accident. What if as

618
00:30:04.039 --> 00:30:07.079
<v Speaker 2>these wide field surveys continuously monitor the sky over the

619
00:30:07.160 --> 00:30:10.720
<v Speaker 2>next few years, we start finding dozens or hundreds of

620
00:30:10.759 --> 00:30:13.359
<v Speaker 2>these rapidly starving supermassive black holes.

621
00:30:13.680 --> 00:30:16.599
<v Speaker 3>If this rapid shutdown is found to be a common occurrence,

622
00:30:17.599 --> 00:30:21.319
<v Speaker 3>it fundamentally ulsters our understanding of galaxy evolution as a.

623
00:30:21.279 --> 00:30:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Whole, because it would suggest that supermassive black holes don't

624
00:30:24.759 --> 00:30:28.880
<v Speaker 2>just slowly steadily burn through their fuel over eons, right.

625
00:30:28.960 --> 00:30:32.880
<v Speaker 3>It would mean they gorge themselves abruptly and violently shut

626
00:30:32.920 --> 00:30:37.759
<v Speaker 3>down and then perhaps restart again in these cyclical cosmic hiccups.

627
00:30:38.000 --> 00:30:40.119
<v Speaker 2>And because the black hole is the engine right at

628
00:30:40.160 --> 00:30:43.480
<v Speaker 2>the center of the galaxy, its behavior dictates the environment

629
00:30:43.519 --> 00:30:45.319
<v Speaker 2>of the entire galaxy around.

630
00:30:45.000 --> 00:30:48.720
<v Speaker 3>It, exactly. It's connected to everything. The extreme radiation from

631
00:30:48.759 --> 00:30:52.319
<v Speaker 3>an active agn heats up the gas in the surrounding galaxy.

632
00:30:51.960 --> 00:30:54.119
<v Speaker 2>And hot gas can't form stars, right.

633
00:30:54.319 --> 00:30:57.359
<v Speaker 3>It actually prevents new stars from forming. It essentially sterilizes

634
00:30:57.400 --> 00:30:59.680
<v Speaker 3>the galaxy. Okay, But if a black hole can suddenly

635
00:30:59.640 --> 00:31:02.839
<v Speaker 3>shut up its energy output in just seven years, it

636
00:31:02.920 --> 00:31:06.279
<v Speaker 3>drastically immediately changes the thermal environment of the host galaxy.

637
00:31:06.319 --> 00:31:08.400
<v Speaker 2>The gas cools down, yes.

638
00:31:08.599 --> 00:31:11.759
<v Speaker 3>And that can potentially trigger sudden massive bursts of new

639
00:31:11.799 --> 00:31:14.720
<v Speaker 3>star formation. So the life cycle of the central black

640
00:31:14.720 --> 00:31:17.440
<v Speaker 3>hole is intimately tied to the life cycle of every

641
00:31:17.480 --> 00:31:19.079
<v Speaker 3>single star system around it.

642
00:31:19.079 --> 00:31:22.279
<v Speaker 2>It's all connected. It really paints a picture of a

643
00:31:22.400 --> 00:31:27.200
<v Speaker 2>universe that is breathing, flickering, surging, and starving all the

644
00:31:27.240 --> 00:31:28.440
<v Speaker 2>time right over our heads.

645
00:31:28.559 --> 00:31:30.319
<v Speaker 3>It's far more alive than we give it credit for.

646
00:31:30.720 --> 00:31:33.039
<v Speaker 2>Think about your own perception of the night sky for

647
00:31:33.079 --> 00:31:36.559
<v Speaker 2>a second. We use the stars as these ultimate symbols

648
00:31:36.599 --> 00:31:39.400
<v Speaker 2>of eternity and permanence. We do We just assume the

649
00:31:39.440 --> 00:31:43.559
<v Speaker 2>cosmos is this quiet, ancient backdrop to our super fast

650
00:31:43.599 --> 00:31:46.960
<v Speaker 2>paced human lives. But the evidence from Jay zero two

651
00:31:47.200 --> 00:31:51.559
<v Speaker 2>eight clearly shows that the universe is just as restless, unpredictable,

652
00:31:52.000 --> 00:31:56.359
<v Speaker 2>and capable of sudden shocking transformations as absolutely anything here

653
00:31:56.400 --> 00:31:56.839
<v Speaker 2>on Earth.

654
00:31:56.920 --> 00:32:00.359
<v Speaker 3>It is a highly active, turbulent landscape, and are really

655
00:32:00.400 --> 00:32:04.440
<v Speaker 3>only just now building the observational infrastructure capable of watching

656
00:32:04.480 --> 00:32:06.119
<v Speaker 3>that turbulence unfold in real time.

657
00:32:06.200 --> 00:32:07.559
<v Speaker 2>We're finally opening our eyes.

658
00:32:07.640 --> 00:32:10.359
<v Speaker 3>Every new anomaly we find forces us to look deeper

659
00:32:10.359 --> 00:32:13.680
<v Speaker 3>and refine our understanding of the extreme physics governing the dark.

660
00:32:13.720 --> 00:32:16.799
<v Speaker 2>Which leaves us with a truly mind bending final thought

661
00:32:16.799 --> 00:32:17.880
<v Speaker 2>for you to ponder tonight.

662
00:32:18.079 --> 00:32:18.519
<v Speaker 3>Let's hear it.

663
00:32:19.079 --> 00:32:22.400
<v Speaker 2>The light from the starving black hole took ten billion

664
00:32:22.519 --> 00:32:25.759
<v Speaker 2>years to cross the void and reach your telescopes, delivering

665
00:32:25.799 --> 00:32:29.720
<v Speaker 2>a message of sudden, catastrophic change that happened long before

666
00:32:29.759 --> 00:32:33.119
<v Speaker 2>our planet even existed, long before. So when you look

667
00:32:33.160 --> 00:32:36.720
<v Speaker 2>up at that seemingly quiet sky tonight, ask yourself this,

668
00:32:37.799 --> 00:32:41.559
<v Speaker 2>What other invisible cosmic alarms are going off right now?

669
00:32:41.720 --> 00:32:42.720
<v Speaker 3>That's a chilling thought.

670
00:32:42.880 --> 00:32:46.680
<v Speaker 2>What massive instantaneous transformations in the very fabric of the

671
00:32:46.759 --> 00:32:49.759
<v Speaker 2>universe are rushing toward Earth at the speed of light

672
00:32:49.839 --> 00:32:53.599
<v Speaker 2>right now, carrying the news of a radically altered cosmos.

673
00:32:53.160 --> 00:32:56.839
<v Speaker 3>News that our descendants won't actually see for another billion years. Exactly,

674
00:32:56.960 --> 00:33:00.319
<v Speaker 3>the universe is constantly broadcasting its evolution. Just have to

675
00:33:00.400 --> 00:33:05.279
<v Speaker 3>keep our instruments calibrated, our minds open, and well be

676
00:33:05.359 --> 00:33:06.960
<v Speaker 3>willing to throw away the rule book when the light

677
00:33:07.039 --> 00:34:02.440
<v Speaker 3>finally arrives s
