Speaker 1: Get ready.
Speaker 2: Okay, March eighteen, twenty twenty five, allegedly, according to that
Speaker 2: thing we call a calendar, This the O'Kelly effect. You
Speaker 2: if you found this show, you know what you're listening to. Okay,
Speaker 2: I don't even know why I tell you the name
Speaker 2: of the show at the top, but it is a
Speaker 2: Teesday Tuesday, and we started broadcasting on Sunday. We did
Speaker 2: two shows on Sunday. I've already released those podcasts, so
Speaker 2: they're out there already for your perusal, and they are
Speaker 2: being replayed on the twenty four to seven Ocelly dot
Speaker 2: Com radio station Anyway News Today. Where should I begin?
Speaker 2: Do I want to begin with my favorite headline of
Speaker 2: the day, or should I begin with the concept of
Speaker 2: the day and the news and so on and so forth. Well,
Speaker 2: it is my show, so I can do whatever the
Speaker 2: hell I want. Right, how about we begin with war
Speaker 2: and peace and let's see if you can pick up
Speaker 2: on the theme or the thematic existence that we find
Speaker 2: ourselves in during this part of the information age. Okay,
Speaker 2: in war and peace, let's go there first. Russia Ukraine
Speaker 2: war updates. Right, There's lots to be said there, you know,
Speaker 2: Zelensky sat down right and went to the table, as
Speaker 2: they say, definitely, you know, gave some concessions, et cetera.
Speaker 2: And now there's a back and forth going on with Russia.
Speaker 2: Of course, the ceasefire not so absolute and unconditional as
Speaker 2: it was first reported, et cetera, but a work in progress.
Speaker 2: Once again, should we go to other things that are happening.
Speaker 2: Do we need to talk about what happened in Yemen?
Speaker 2: I think you can get that coverage elsewhere. But we
Speaker 2: do know that the US struck what they are calling
Speaker 2: Houthi targets in Yemen, and there was a retaliation from
Speaker 2: the Huthis allegedly, and I do say allegedly because in
Speaker 2: previous times there have been reports of the Hoothis attacking
Speaker 2: from US well favoring sources out there, et cetera, that
Speaker 2: proved to not be necessarily true. Then there were other
Speaker 2: times that the Houthis lied and said they did stuff
Speaker 2: that they didn't actually do. So it's interesting. Lots of
Speaker 2: sweeping declarations out there about what's going on in Yemen.
Speaker 2: Only thing we know for certain is that the Trump
Speaker 2: administration has gotten active once again, claiming that US interests
Speaker 2: have been interfered with by the Houthis and in the
Speaker 2: Yemeny conflict and all that genocide going on over there, which, oh,
Speaker 2: by the way, they're not calling it a genocide just yet,
Speaker 2: but it seems like history will call it that. Maybe
Speaker 2: it depends on who actually writes the history. Right, anyway,
Speaker 2: that's happening, and we are actively involved there, what else
Speaker 2: are we, allegedly the wi you know, the Wei in
Speaker 2: air quotes again actively involved in? Well, how about Israel
Speaker 2: attacks on God amped up? A lot A lot of
Speaker 2: people are trying to focus in the digital media, the
Speaker 2: criminal excuse me, corporate media out there. Those people are
Speaker 2: trying to tell you that a lot of children were killed.
Speaker 2: And I don't doubt it, because there's a lot of
Speaker 2: children in the population in Gaza, in Palestine, et cetera.
Speaker 2: But what is the circumstance there? There was supposed to
Speaker 2: be a ceasefire. Well, doesn't look like that's happening. NETANYAHUO
Speaker 2: has fired a couple of his people over there, et cetera,
Speaker 2: et cetera, and still a work in progress, lots of
Speaker 2: sweeping declarations and not a lot being accomplished right away, right,
Speaker 2: So isn't it fascinating about sweeping declarations and accomplishments because
Speaker 2: the Trump administration now wants to challenge something. Guess what,
Speaker 2: the pardons from the Biden administration. I don't recall ever
Speaker 2: presidents challenging the pardons of other presidents. I mean, we've
Speaker 2: had this customary thing, and on their way out the door,
Speaker 2: a lot of them make a lot of pardons, and
Speaker 2: it does happen. Now, of course, there's a lot more contromaisy,
Speaker 2: if you will, to the pardons from the Biden administration,
Speaker 2: because it was his family, his people, Anthony Fauci, the
Speaker 2: people investigating the J six situation, et cetera. And Trump
Speaker 2: thinks a lot of those should be avoided because of
Speaker 2: the autopen. What is the autopen? If you don't know,
Speaker 2: a lot of times, you know, people that sign a
Speaker 2: lot of autographs one way or another, whether it's a
Speaker 2: baseball star or it's the president of the United States,
Speaker 2: uses a machine that duplicates their signature, but it's supposed
Speaker 2: to be with their authorization, their knowledge. And of course,
Speaker 2: what Trump is floating out there right now to see
Speaker 2: how well it floats, is to see if the idea
Speaker 2: that since Biden was incapacitated clearly during part of his
Speaker 2: term or part of the day, or you know, whichever
Speaker 2: narrative you want to go with that they're now admitting to.
Speaker 2: Could he have actually made the decision to allow the
Speaker 2: autopen to be us used in his name? So that's
Speaker 2: what he's going after. Is there a legal precedent for it?
Speaker 2: Is there a precedent for it at all? Well, who
Speaker 2: the hell knows? And who the hell cares? Is it
Speaker 2: a logical question? Well, again, sweeping declaration, but not sure
Speaker 2: what's gonna get done. I did happen to get a
Speaker 2: news story which was being referenced many, many times by
Speaker 2: a lot of people, and I found that that news
Speaker 2: story was actually done a month ago, and people are
Speaker 2: now referencing it heavily because in defense of Trump right,
Speaker 2: Newsweek put out something that said, look, Americans, and this
Speaker 2: is the headline, Americans who think Country on Right track
Speaker 2: breaks twenty year trend polster. Okay, now this is in
Speaker 2: February this year, all right, And now I got to
Speaker 2: try and get rid of this. Yeah, there we go.
Speaker 2: A survey from conservative leaning This is from the Newsweek article,
Speaker 2: and all of these links. By the way, that I'm
Speaker 2: referencing in the headlines I'm referencing. I'll put in the
Speaker 2: show notes, and I'll even drop a few in the
Speaker 2: chat at Ochelly dot com as I go, so you
Speaker 2: can always roll that back and check it out. I'll
Speaker 2: put the one in there now, I guess, and you
Speaker 2: guys can take a look at the February fourteenth published
Speaker 2: story in Newsweek if you like, and I'm gonna read
Speaker 2: from it now just a bit, right. A survey from
Speaker 2: conservative leaning polster Rasmussen Reports showed a plurality of Americans
Speaker 2: believing the country is on the right track for the
Speaker 2: first time into two decades. This week, Newsweek reached out
Speaker 2: to the White House. Okay, I gotta pause, not just
Speaker 2: because I'm having hiccups or whatever this is, but because
Speaker 2: it's weird, right, because we're on the right track and
Speaker 2: this was published, let's see February fourteen, I believe. Let's
Speaker 2: just take a look and the author I'll give you
Speaker 2: in a second. Yeah, published February fourteenth, and then updated
Speaker 2: February fourteenth a couple hours later. The author there is
Speaker 2: Andrew Stanton anyways, and this is under He's a weekend
Speaker 2: staff writer at Newsweek. All right, and Newsweek again is
Speaker 2: one of those generally accepted vanilla kinda places and all
Speaker 2: that I find it weird that a survey from conservative
Speaker 2: leaning polster Rasmussen, Okay, quoting again from the very opening
Speaker 2: of the article conservative leaning polster. Well, depending on who
Speaker 2: you're talking to all the time, ras Mussen's either a stable,
Speaker 2: nonpartisan sort of a polster, or they're leaning left or
Speaker 2: they're leaning right, depending on your purposes. So one size
Speaker 2: fits all. Rasmussen does collect numbers in a fairly ethical way,
Speaker 2: so they're polls I would take seriously as a sampling
Speaker 2: of the population personally. There's my view on it. I
Speaker 2: know that's not popular among you know, the all and
Speaker 2: outsider media, but dud Rasmussen does do some pretty good
Speaker 2: polls anyways. President Donald Trump moved quickly to an act
Speaker 2: of sweeping conservative agenda in the early days of his
Speaker 2: second term. He has focused on cutting diversity, equity and
Speaker 2: Inclusion DEI of course programs, efforts to deport migrants living
Speaker 2: in the US who entered the country illegally, and major
Speaker 2: cuts to government agencies. Polls offered miss mixed signals about
Speaker 2: public opinion on these actions. Americans are genuinely skeptical of
Speaker 2: billionaire Elon Musk's influence on Trump, and don't agree with
Speaker 2: some of his policies. Trump's high approval rating is fading,
Speaker 2: according to five thirty eight's polling Agent aggregate excuse me
Speaker 2: five thirty eighths polling aggregate, which showed forty nine percent
Speaker 2: of Americans approve of him while forty five point seven
Speaker 2: percent disapproved of him. On Friday, What to Know, Rasmussen,
Speaker 2: which is generally viewed as having a conservative slant, released
Speaker 2: a poll showing that a plurality of Americans believe the
Speaker 2: country is on the right track. The pollster see, this
Speaker 2: is them repeating and repeating, and this is what a
Speaker 2: staff writer does. But I swear to God, it's like
Speaker 2: an AI. Has this guy even real? A poll from
Speaker 2: Ugov and the Economists, conducted among fifteen and ninety five
Speaker 2: adults from February nine to February eleven, showed just thirty
Speaker 2: five percent of Americans believing the country is on the
Speaker 2: right track, compared to fifty two percent who believe the
Speaker 2: country is headed in the wrong direction. See contradictory information.
Speaker 2: After they pound you instantly with a whole bunch of
Speaker 2: stuff and misleads you with the sweeping headline. Right, and
Speaker 2: again this is published a month ago. Now my personal observation,
Speaker 2: generally speaking, not a scientific sample, but looks to me
Speaker 2: like people are approving mostly of what he's doing, or
Speaker 2: at least the spirit of it. Now people have questions
Speaker 2: about the weirdness of stuff like the Ukraine Russia ceasefire
Speaker 2: and all that kind of thing. And today allegedly Trump
Speaker 2: was making a call, but it's a busy day in
Speaker 2: DC because I got a whole lot of other stuff
Speaker 2: to get to here. Okay, just saying anyway, let's go
Speaker 2: back to the headlines, because again, are you starting to
Speaker 2: notice a trend? Will doze lose more money than it saves?
Speaker 2: Now that's a news nation now dot COM's news story. Okay,
Speaker 2: I think it was published yesterday, but let's just take
Speaker 2: a look real fast. I don't want to be inaccurate
Speaker 2: about it. And yeah, there are people starting to look
Speaker 2: at the numbers and ask questions, is those going to
Speaker 2: wind up costing money because of the way it's doing stuff.
Speaker 2: Because it's again not that people don't want cuts in
Speaker 2: government waste and fraud and bs and all that, and
Speaker 2: everybody points to programs that they think are stupid, pointless
Speaker 2: and ridiculous. Of course we do. Everybody I know that
Speaker 2: even looks at what government does says stuff like this.
Speaker 2: We all agree that something needs to be cut. Now,
Speaker 2: I mean, we may all disagree on what, but there's
Speaker 2: definitely stuff that we find ridiculous in government spending and
Speaker 2: say to ourselves all the time, it would be nice
Speaker 2: if they would cut this stuff out. So here's your
Speaker 2: Doge unelected official billionaire, but you know Doge anyway, Doge
Speaker 2: cuts can hinder weather forecasting, internal revenue service layoffs, DHS
Speaker 2: revokes visa. One Columbian student arrests another pro Palestinian protester.
Speaker 2: Oh geez, do I even want to get into that
Speaker 2: story because weird thing there. And I'm just gonna make
Speaker 2: this quick statement, even though I'm actually saving that new
Speaker 2: story for another program. And the Muhammed whatever the dude was, Okay,
Speaker 2: that guy there, Khalil, All right, Yeah, they don't have
Speaker 2: a crime that he committed. Other people were telling me
Speaker 2: he committed a crime. But believe it or not, they're
Speaker 2: just going after him for anti Semitism and saying, you're
Speaker 2: a guest here and you gotta go. And at first
Speaker 2: they thought he was on a student visa. They had
Speaker 2: that wrong and found out he had a green card.
Speaker 2: Then they said, well, we'll revoke that too. He had
Speaker 2: a student visa at one point, but actually got a
Speaker 2: green card by marrying somebody, and so he was here
Speaker 2: under different circumstances than what people initially said. But anyway,
Speaker 2: does that matter at this point? Not much. The wini
Speaker 2: dogs are barking, but you know, the idea that they
Speaker 2: can declare somebody a terrorist because they're anti Semitic, which,
Speaker 2: by the way, there's no law against anti semitism so
Speaker 2: long as you're not encouraging or directing violence against people. So,
Speaker 2: you know, as despicable as it might be, as terrible
Speaker 2: as you might think it is, he actually doesn't have
Speaker 2: a technical charge against him, that guy. So I don't know,
Speaker 2: you know, I got my views on that, and maybe
Speaker 2: they're a little liberal, but maybe not, because I don't
Speaker 2: know what the hell of liberal is anymore, do you. Anyway,
Speaker 2: Let's get to something that my listeners might actually care about.
Speaker 2: How about that for a change? Right just a short
Speaker 2: time ago, two day in fact, this is the big headline,
Speaker 2: and this is generally repeated and redrafted and regrafted headline
Speaker 2: out there JFK files released by Trump administration related to assassination. Okay,
Speaker 2: that's the most benign headline that I've seen Washington. And
Speaker 2: here's the thing. I'm reading from a CBS article, But
Speaker 2: there are various articles out there about it, and I'll
Speaker 2: drop that in the live chat, and again all this
Speaker 2: stuff will be linked up in the in the show notes,
Speaker 2: all right, so you'll be able to follow all the
Speaker 2: things that I decided to sample so that I could
Speaker 2: get a glimpse of what's happening. Which, by the way,
Speaker 2: I'm actually involved with some of the people that are
Speaker 2: going to do the initial examinations of this stuff, and
Speaker 2: there's been over one thousand PDFs that are in the
Speaker 2: process of being released as I speak. Okay, so let's
Speaker 2: get some perspective here. Everybody's going, hey, he did it.
Speaker 2: He followed through. We followed through with his campaign promise.
Speaker 2: That remains to be seen if the substance actually follows through.
Speaker 2: And I have maintained this skepticism no matter who is
Speaker 2: in the office, right still do Anyway, we just got
Speaker 2: stuff dropped electronically. It's being made available allegedly in person.
Speaker 2: It's being made available. I don't have confirmation on that,
Speaker 2: but let's just take their word for it for a
Speaker 2: moment and get to the big pronouncement, which was apparently
Speaker 2: ready to roll, and everybody had a slightly differing version
Speaker 2: of this ready to drop. This evening, which they did
Speaker 2: sometime between an hour ago and two hours ago, is
Speaker 2: when this stuff started becoming available online. But it's in
Speaker 2: the process of being released. Okay, just letting you know that,
Speaker 2: that's me. But let's look at the CBS news story Washington.
Speaker 2: The Trump administration on Tuesday evening released tens of thousands
Speaker 2: of pages of government documents related to the in nineteen
Speaker 2: sixty three assassination of President John F. Kennedy Junior. Which
Speaker 2: is stupid, CBS. The assassination was not of John F.
Speaker 2: Kennedy Junior. It was of John F. Kennedy. Oh, CBS,
Speaker 2: you see that. This is where you got a guy
Speaker 2: writing an article that has no idea what he's writing about.
Speaker 2: It's not John F. Kennedy Junior. John F. Kennedy Junior
Speaker 2: died in a plane crash. Okay, not in nineteen sixty three,
Speaker 2: and nobody was looking for those files, at least not
Speaker 2: the Trump administration or the federal government. Thank you, John F.
Speaker 2: Kennedy Junior. It says, I'm not kidding you guys. I
Speaker 2: should screenshot it anyway. Weeks after President Trump ordered government
Speaker 2: agencies to unveil their JFK files to the public, the
Speaker 2: documents were uploaded by the National Archives and Records Administration NORA,
Speaker 2: and the agency responsible for housing the government's collection of
Speaker 2: records related to the assassination. The Archives said Tuesday of
Speaker 2: the JFK files that quote all records previously withheld for
Speaker 2: classification end quote have been released. Shortly after taking office
Speaker 2: in January, the President took executive action to establish a
Speaker 2: process to declassify and release any remaining documents related to
Speaker 2: Kennedy's killing, as well as the assassination of Robert F.
Speaker 2: Kennedy and Martin Luther King Junior. The order instructed the
Speaker 2: Director of National Intelligence and Attorney General to present the
Speaker 2: President with a plan for the full and complete release
Speaker 2: of records relating to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
Speaker 2: Thank god they didn't put a junior on the end
Speaker 2: of that one. Last month, the FBI said it had
Speaker 2: discovered roughly twy four hundred records related to the assassination.
Speaker 2: During assert stemming from mister Trump's executive action, mister Trump
Speaker 2: estimated the new files contain roughly eighty thousand pages. BS
Speaker 2: News as a team of reporters sifting through the records
Speaker 2: to identify what documents contain new information. Many of the
Speaker 2: records were expected to be unredacted versions of documents that
Speaker 2: have been previously released but partially obscured in the past.
Speaker 2: Various investigations into the JFK assassination over the years, some
Speaker 2: as recently as the nineteen nineties, swept up classified information
Speaker 2: that dealt with the intelligence gathering methods and friendly foreign
Speaker 2: governments but were not directly linked to the assassination. Portions
Speaker 2: of documents and some entire records had remained classified for
Speaker 2: decades to protect sources and methods. Okay, I'm gonna stop,
Speaker 2: because now we're just into CIA talking points. Okay, we
Speaker 2: needed to protect sources and methods in the nineties and
Speaker 2: in the early two thousands and in the twenty tens. Anyway,
Speaker 2: CBS tells you that according to the Mary Pharaoh Fou Foundation,
Speaker 2: and I'm scared hipping through the article a bit. The
Speaker 2: documents have been uploaded to a portal and they're being
Speaker 2: maintained at the National Archives, and you can find them here.
Speaker 2: They give you a hot link. They also tell you
Speaker 2: that you know you got a link to the Mary
Speaker 2: Pharaoll Foundation. They describe it as a nonprofit that compiles
Speaker 2: historical government records about the JFK assassination and other events.
Speaker 2: Roughly three thousand, five hundred documents in the official collection
Speaker 2: contained redactions before the latest release, about seventy five percent
Speaker 2: of those records were produced by the CIA. More than
Speaker 2: five hundred other records were withheld from public release entirely.
Speaker 2: The Mary Paroll Foundation runs its own JFK Documents repository
Speaker 2: on its website, which has deeper search functions for exploring
Speaker 2: the trobe of records. It's interesting they give them credit.
Speaker 2: The group typically adds new documents shortly after they are
Speaker 2: released by the Archives. Why did Trump release the JFK files?
Speaker 2: Mister Trump campaigned on declassifying and release records related to
Speaker 2: the JFK assassination in part two to his political alliance
Speaker 2: with Robert F. Kennedy Junior, who has long called for
Speaker 2: more transparency about the assassinations that killed his uncle and father.
Speaker 2: Then they give you a history about the arb and
Speaker 2: all that, And what I'm going to do instead is
Speaker 2: go and take a look at the executive order. Okay,
Speaker 2: now again skipping through just a bit, because I want
Speaker 2: to get to the actual process, right, policy and purpose.
Speaker 2: He gives you a whole thing about why things should
Speaker 2: be done, criticizes Biden all that, But let's get the
Speaker 2: Section two of the Executive Order Declassification and Disclosure. Within
Speaker 2: fifteen days of the date of this order, the Director
Speaker 2: of National Intelligence and the Attorney General shell, in coordination
Speaker 2: with the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs
Speaker 2: and the Counsel to the President president a plan to
Speaker 2: present excuse me, he planned to the President for the
Speaker 2: full and complete release of records relating to the assassination
Speaker 2: of President John F. Kennedy within forty five days of
Speaker 2: the date of this order. The Director of National Intelligence
Speaker 2: and Attorney General shall Yeah, here we go, he repeats himself.
Speaker 2: But why because he needs to tell you, with the
Speaker 2: assistance of the President for National Security. Okay, Counsel to
Speaker 2: the President reviews records. Okay, Why because he's repeating it?
Speaker 2: Because now records related to the assassination of Senator Robert F.
Speaker 2: Kennedy and Reverend doctor Martin Luther King Junior, and present
Speaker 2: a plan to the President for the full and complete
Speaker 2: release of these records. He wanted that plan presented to
Speaker 2: him in fifteen days. General provisions. Nothing in this Order
Speaker 2: shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect one the
Speaker 2: authority granted by law to an executive department or agency
Speaker 2: or the head thereof, or the functions of the Director
Speaker 2: of the Office of Management and Budget relating to the
Speaker 2: budgetary administration or legislative proposals b. This Order shall be
Speaker 2: implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability
Speaker 2: of appropriations. See. This Order is not intended to and
Speaker 2: does not create, any right or benefit, substantive or procedural,
Speaker 2: enforceable at law or inequity by any party against the
Speaker 2: United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees,
Speaker 2: or agents, or other persons anyway. Poll out of legal
Speaker 2: mumbo jumbo at the bottom. But what the core of
Speaker 2: this is. When we go back to section one and
Speaker 2: he talks about the JFK Records Collection Act, the President
Speaker 2: John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of nineteen ninety
Speaker 2: two required all records related to the assassination of President
Speaker 2: Kennedy two be publicly disclosed in full by October twenty sixth,
Speaker 2: twenty seventeen, unless the President certifies that continued postponement is
Speaker 2: made necessary by an identifiable harm to the military, defense,
Speaker 2: intelligence operations, law enforcement, or conduct of foreign relations. And
Speaker 2: section two of this subsection two excuse me the identifiable
Speaker 2: harm is of such gravity that it outweighs the public
Speaker 2: interest and disclosure. President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection
Speaker 2: Act of nineteen ninety two, Section five G two D.
Speaker 2: Public Law one oh two five twenty six, one oh six,
Speaker 2: Statute three forty four three Comma three four four eight
Speaker 2: to forty nine, codified at forty four USC. Twenty one seven.
Speaker 2: Note I previously accepted proposed redactions from executive departments and
Speaker 2: agencies in twenty seventeen and twenty eighteen, but ordered the
Speaker 2: continued reevaluation of those remaining reactions see temporary certification for
Speaker 2: certain records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Yeah,
Speaker 2: he did that in twenty seventeen. Where we were waiting
Speaker 2: all that time, and here is what he says has
Speaker 2: changed since then, after a bunch of other you know,
Speaker 2: you know references to the different regulatory things. April twenty six,
Speaker 2: twenty okay, I also ordered agencies to re review each
Speaker 2: of those reactions over the next three years and disclose
Speaker 2: information that no longer warrants continued withholding under the standard
Speaker 2: set forth in that part of the Records Collection Act
Speaker 2: of nineteen ninety two. President Biden issued subsequent certifications with
Speaker 2: respect to these records in twenty twenty one, twenty twenty two,
Speaker 2: and twenty twenty three, which gave agencies additional time to
Speaker 2: review the records and withhold information from public disclosure. Anyway,
Speaker 2: I have now determined, and I'm skipping again. I have
Speaker 2: now determined that the continued reaction and withholding of information
Speaker 2: from records pertaining to the assassination of John F. Kennedy
Speaker 2: is not consistent with the public interest, and the release
Speaker 2: of these records is long overdue. And although no Act
Speaker 2: of Congress directs the release of information pertaining to the
Speaker 2: assassination of Senator Robert F. Kennedy and the Reverend doctor
Speaker 2: Martin Luther King, Jr. I have determined that the release
Speaker 2: of all records in the federal government's possession pertaining to
Speaker 2: each of these assassinations is also in the public interest.
Speaker 2: All right, that is vagary. And what I'm telling you
Speaker 2: now is, don't get excited about any of that, because again,
Speaker 2: Robert F. Kennedy's assassination was investigated by the LAPD. See
Speaker 2: you know, Special Unit, Senator. I think would be a
Speaker 2: good phrase to go look up. That was the original
Speaker 2: book title written by the guy who ran the investigation
Speaker 2: out of LA Martin Luther King Junior. Another story. But
Speaker 2: even though we have HSCA records still being withheld, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.
Speaker 2: I got a funny feeling that one is not going
Speaker 2: to get the same attention here. So the JFK stuff
Speaker 2: dropped today. What do we know about it, Chuck? What
Speaker 2: do we know? Well, I'm sorry to tell you, but
Speaker 2: thirteen hundred PDFs I have not had a chance to read.
Speaker 2: By the way, I'm going to drop the entire text
Speaker 2: of the classification or a link to the entire text
Speaker 2: of the executive order and the official you know, President
Speaker 2: Donald J. Trump, the White House website, you know, entry
Speaker 2: there so that you guys can read the entirety of
Speaker 2: the text yourselves. But I wonder do I have a
Speaker 2: theme here still? I think so. Anyway, last week, my
Speaker 2: source has told me it's kind of funny because my
Speaker 2: source is being right and wrong at the same time.
Speaker 2: Is funny. But I was told that by the twenty
Speaker 2: first all the JFK stuff would come out, and I
Speaker 2: had never been given that sort of inside information before.
Speaker 2: And it looks to me like, even though you know
Speaker 2: that all the press releases say eighty thousand pages have
Speaker 2: just been released, and President Trump followed through, and they're
Speaker 2: really kind of you know, don't pay no attention to
Speaker 2: those extra FBI files and all that he followed through
Speaker 2: on his campaign promise. Yay, I got it, But we
Speaker 2: don't know yet because nobody's had a chance to read
Speaker 2: this stuff. Compare notes. Do you understand that we have
Speaker 2: to go back and look at did they lift any
Speaker 2: new reactions? Do we have better versions of new documents
Speaker 2: or do we have brand new documents? Do we have
Speaker 2: stuff that doesn't match up? Do we have stuff that
Speaker 2: now finally, you know, pages long loss seemingly have reappeared
Speaker 2: that we're attached to something before. This is going to
Speaker 2: be a lot of compare and contrast work, and I
Speaker 2: do know that there is a team of researchers right
Speaker 2: now on it. But also the National Archives is still
Speaker 2: in the process of posting this stuff. It's not all posted,
Speaker 2: so relax, it's gonna take probably I would estimate a
Speaker 2: week before we get through all this stuff and give
Speaker 2: you an accurate and accurate assessment. So anybody who's declaring
Speaker 2: to you, hey, job done, you know Victory achieved, Yeah,
Speaker 2: calm down. We don't know, and we don't know if
Speaker 2: we got more than we asked for, like we did
Speaker 2: actually strangely in twenty seventeen, where we got additional information
Speaker 2: we didn't ask for and a whole bunch of withholding
Speaker 2: that we were waiting twenty five years for them to
Speaker 2: get to and they still held onto and Trump admittedly
Speaker 2: it was part of it, didn't even ask them to
Speaker 2: follow any you know, sort of standards they were supposed to.
Speaker 2: They didn't even have to fill out all the paperwork
Speaker 2: to get it done last time, and it was withheld
Speaker 2: more just because basically the intelligence agencies asked him to. Also,
Speaker 2: even though I'm not a big fan of his head
Speaker 2: of National Intelligence. You know what, she wasn't even in
Speaker 2: office yet when he was making this executive order go
Speaker 2: out there. She had not been confirmed as the d
Speaker 2: and I had right, so you still had heads and
Speaker 2: deputies and all kinds of people not in office. So anyway,
Speaker 2: I hope he doesn't start canning people at the National
Speaker 2: Archives because if they get doged, we're in big trouble
Speaker 2: because they don't have enough people over there to begin with,
Speaker 2: just saying, just saying, so where are we? There? Lots
Speaker 2: of sweeping stuff, but what about the substance. It's not
Speaker 2: all there yet. You can't judge it yet. Still on
Speaker 2: Tuesday night, I assure you we'll get there. Anyway, I
Speaker 2: could talk about AI nurses and how they're reshaping hospital
Speaker 2: care and people are suddenly caring about that artificial intelligence. Yeah,
Speaker 2: you can get on a skype call with a nurse
Speaker 2: and she'll give you your advice you need, and she
Speaker 2: can speak every language because she's not human. Are you
Speaker 2: cool with that? I mean, after all, there are dating
Speaker 2: apps where you can date a artificial intelligence now, right,
Speaker 2: virtual girlfriend and all that, And I'm telling you it
Speaker 2: doesn't come with a real doll. And I can't at least,
Speaker 2: you know, get the full fully immersed experience. I don't care,
Speaker 2: but some people do, and they'll go this way and
Speaker 2: they'll talk to a cartoon on a screen. Well animated
Speaker 2: cartoon might be human looking, but it's not. Meanwhile, what
Speaker 2: is resurfaced in this month the whole thing about Trump
Speaker 2: being an agent of the KGB ever since the nineteen eighties,
Speaker 2: that has gone back around and through the cycle. Bet
Speaker 2: you nobody's paying attention to that. But here we go
Speaker 2: again with this former GRU guy who is and that
Speaker 2: he knows for a fact that's what it was. Does
Speaker 2: that have any bearing on anything? Nah? But there's lots
Speaker 2: of crap for the mill out there, lots and lots
Speaker 2: of crap. And by the way, I don't buy this
Speaker 2: guy's story. Do I think that Trump is kind of
Speaker 2: in Putin's pocket now? Yes? But do I think he's
Speaker 2: been there since the eighties? If so? Poor use of
Speaker 2: assets there, g Are you just saying you didn't do
Speaker 2: much with him until recent years? And it doesn't take
Speaker 2: thirty years to position somebody to be president, by the bye,
Speaker 2: It really doesn't. If you want to convince the public
Speaker 2: that this whole thing is real and you're just you know,
Speaker 2: putting a Manchuarian candidate and it doesn't take thirty years.
Speaker 2: So I got my issues. Anyway, what is happening in Ukraine?
Speaker 2: Here's the problem? Do you care? Do you notice? And oh,
Speaker 2: by the way, are you getting any accurate reporting? Probably?
Speaker 1: What is the answer to all that?
Speaker 2: I bet you can guess. Anyway, I was going to
Speaker 2: take a look at one last little thing, and that
Speaker 2: is this idea that.
Speaker 3: Yo yovis Doug Campbell, host of the Dallas Action podcast
Speaker 3: presented by Wall Street Window. And you are listening to
Speaker 3: the o'chilly effect revelation through conversation.
Speaker 1: Ochili dot com. You like history, real history that you
Speaker 1: were never taught in schools. Why the Vietnam War, Nuclear
Speaker 1: Bombs and Nation Building in Southeast Asia by author Mike Swanson,
Speaker 1: with new documentation never seen before that'll open your eyes
Speaker 1: to events that led up to this. Why the Vietnam War,
Speaker 1: Nuclear Bombs in Nation Building in Southeast Asia nineteen forty
Speaker 1: five through nineteen sixty one. Get your copy today at
Speaker 1: Amazon dot com. Why the Vietnam War by author Mike
Speaker 1: Swanson dot Com Radio Network.
Speaker 2: Go ahead call it.
Speaker 4: I'm listed in the truth about the Jafay assassination.
Speaker 2: Right, Well, what do you want to know Judy Baker's
Speaker 2: wild claim Oswald girlfriends he knew Ruby and Barry handswer weapons. Really,
Speaker 2: I imagine I could claim I have four wheels. It
Speaker 2: doesn't make me a wagon.
Speaker 4: But okay, Oswald was on the building and I'm trying
Speaker 4: to prevent the murder of John Kennedy. Come on now,
Speaker 4: has a real.
Speaker 2: Effort on the day of Hay assassination claim. Go to
Speaker 2: Amazon dot com enter Judith Baker in her own words.
Speaker 2: You'll get the results for a digital copy of a
Speaker 2: book where Walt Brown utilizes her own words and the
Speaker 2: known evidence in the case to get at well a
Speaker 2: different perspective. Let's say you can get Judith Arry Baker
Speaker 2: in her own words from the author himself, signed if
Speaker 2: you request it by contacting doctor Brown at k I
Speaker 2: A S JFK at aol dot com. It's a fun
Speaker 2: book and it actually dissects the many, many fantastic claims
Speaker 2: Judith very Baker in her own words.
Speaker 1: Information ready for it?
Speaker 2: So still continuing on a Tuesday, let me just take
Speaker 2: up a little bit more of your time and add
Speaker 2: to the news stories here. Uh, just a touch. And
Speaker 2: I do have another news program scheduled for Thursday, Thursday, uh, Wednesday,
Speaker 2: we'll have Albert Lanier on the show. On Friday, I
Speaker 2: plan to do the call in show and maybe I
Speaker 2: won't experiment with the phone lines this week, but we
Speaker 2: do need to come up with some new technical solutions
Speaker 2: to a couple of problems coming up because Skype is disappearing,
Speaker 2: and I don't know if we're going to do phone
Speaker 2: call shows anymore, or if we do, maybe I have
Speaker 2: to do them by myself. I don't know. I just
Speaker 2: don't know. Okay, So media Hostbusters, it's kind of like Ghostbusters,
Speaker 2: but the sequels may or may not suck. Your experiences
Speaker 2: might indeed vary. So where do I want to go
Speaker 2: with this? Well? This week, okay, and literally the news
Speaker 2: stories dropped. What let's see the dates on these news
Speaker 2: stories a couple of days ago, looks like and I'll
Speaker 2: go with the BBC on this because they're reporting is
Speaker 2: concise and it's at least from another government run agency
Speaker 2: about a government run propaganda outlet, which is the Voice
Speaker 2: of America. Now, a lot of people think of the
Speaker 2: Voice of America as just what the radio station right
Speaker 2: and putting out propaganda course to try and counter the
Speaker 2: narratives of the Soviets, et cetera. And look, maybe it's
Speaker 2: a Cold War relic that needs to go away. Now.
Speaker 2: According to Donald Trump, it was a left wing outlet
Speaker 2: because they did stories on gay and trans people. So
Speaker 2: it automatically became completely left wing and sick and disgusting
Speaker 2: and horrible, and they say terrible things about America. And
Speaker 2: that's what Trump was saying in twenty twenty one. But here,
Speaker 2: four years later, Donald Trump is telling us, guess what
Speaker 2: I'm getting rid of it? And how's he going to
Speaker 2: do that? Well, let's take a look at the BBC
Speaker 2: story and see how the rest of the world is
Speaker 2: seeing this. US President Donald Trump has signed an ordered
Speaker 2: a strip back federally funded news organization Voice of America,
Speaker 2: accusing it of being quote anti Trump and radical end quote.
Speaker 2: A White House statement said the order would ensure tax
Speaker 2: a quote ensure taxpayers are no longer on the hook
Speaker 2: for radical propaganda end quote. Alluded quotes from politicians and
Speaker 2: right wing media criticizing the broadcaster. VOA, still primarily a
Speaker 2: radio service, was set up during World War Two to
Speaker 2: counter Nazi propaganda. It says it currently reaches hundreds of
Speaker 2: millions of people globally each week. Mike O'bramowitz, VOA's director,
Speaker 2: said he and virtually his entire staff of thirteen hundred
Speaker 2: people had been put on paid leave. Abramovitz said that
Speaker 2: the order left VOA unable to carry out its vital
Speaker 2: mission quote vital mission especially critical today when America's adversaries
Speaker 2: like Iran, China, Russia and all that are sinking billions
Speaker 2: of dollars into creating false narratives to discredit the United
Speaker 2: States end quote. All right, now, before I go back
Speaker 2: to the article and go back to this guy and
Speaker 2: what he's saying in the National Press Club and all that,
Speaker 2: there is an argument to be made here that thirteen
Speaker 2: hundred people don't need to be available to VOA. But
Speaker 2: the problem is that BOA does a lot of other stuff. Okay,
Speaker 2: that includes Radio Free Europe. Yeah, I got that Radio
Speaker 2: Free Europe and the Arab News Organization. I gotta take
Speaker 2: a look at it because I had a note for it,
Speaker 2: but forgot what I was saying there. Radio Liberty, Okay,
Speaker 2: whole bunch of organizations, including a digital news speed service
Speaker 2: which is out there meant to be a pro American counterweight.
Speaker 2: To guess what other government run outlets that are out
Speaker 2: there in getting international reach. RT was one of them
Speaker 2: for a long time. Russia today absolutely a government run
Speaker 2: thing from Russia. There are various Arab news outlets that
Speaker 2: are meant to only reach the people there with their
Speaker 2: narratives and a lot of English speaking stuff, and a
Speaker 2: lot of stuff that would be pro American is banned
Speaker 2: in a lot of places. So RT makes a point.
Speaker 2: Excuse me, not RT, excuse me. VOA and it's affiliated
Speaker 2: groups make the point that they are the only pro
Speaker 2: American counter narrative out there. One would say that it
Speaker 2: might not be a good idea. You could reshape it,
Speaker 2: you could refit it, you could change it. But when
Speaker 2: you've got six or seven entities, and I want to
Speaker 2: look that up real fast. Actually, there's like six or
Speaker 2: seven entities that are connected to VOA, and I had
Speaker 2: it here in my notes and I don't know what
Speaker 2: I did with it now. But the point is that
Speaker 2: there's even this new digital information sharing thing which is
Speaker 2: meant to be a workaround for the fact that social
Speaker 2: media is banned in a lot of places where free
Speaker 2: speech is you know, you think free speech is bad
Speaker 2: in Europe, you have to see what it's like. And
Speaker 2: I don't know Yemen right now, but then again, I
Speaker 2: guess Yemen's got other problems since we're bombing the Houthis allegedly.
Speaker 2: But anyway, VOA Associated News is all I'm going to
Speaker 2: enter into a search engine and going to tell you
Speaker 2: Voice of America English News Service and all that. There's
Speaker 2: a lot more to it. Let's see what they have
Speaker 2: officially that they say. And the funny thing is, look,
Speaker 2: this is not something that I would normally want a
Speaker 2: champion or anything like that or tell you that, you know,
Speaker 2: because it's out there in twenty seven languages, and it's
Speaker 2: got a chance at at least being you know, pro
Speaker 2: or revelatory regarding you know, what goes on in America
Speaker 2: and things like that as far as the rest of
Speaker 2: the world goes because otherwise we're at the mercy of
Speaker 2: the narratives that other people are going to put out there. Yes, yes,
Speaker 2: And indeed, at one time VOA and some of its
Speaker 2: associated stuff Radio Free Europe and all that was really
Speaker 2: just funded by our intelligence agencies, and they put it
Speaker 2: out there again as a psychological warfare tool, and I'm
Speaker 2: pretty certain it still is today. Now is this wise
Speaker 2: to dismantle it or is it wiser to utilize it
Speaker 2: for a better purpose. Let's imagine I don't hate Trump
Speaker 2: for a minute, Okay, let's try and imagine that. And
Speaker 2: how about would it be a way of making it
Speaker 2: more efficient? Could you redirect said weapon? Could you redeploy
Speaker 2: it with new people at the head? I mean, this
Speaker 2: guy is willing to go over there and become the
Speaker 2: chair of the Kennedy Center, you know, for performing arts
Speaker 2: while he's president. But screw VOA. Let's just trash it.
Speaker 2: Let's pretty much pull the plug on it for the
Speaker 2: most part and minimize its funding. I don't even know
Speaker 2: if Trump knows all the stuff that's gonna go because
Speaker 2: of it. You know, like I said, there's a whole
Speaker 2: Middle East Reporting Agency, there's a whole you know, there's
Speaker 2: Radio Free Europe, there's Liberty Radio. There's all these things.
Speaker 2: And by the way, they're not just broadcasting on the
Speaker 2: dinosaur amfms out there in shortwave, but they are on
Speaker 2: shortwave an AM and FM troop. But they're also out
Speaker 2: there as podcasters and as media distribution centers, et cetera,
Speaker 2: et cetera. And there's another funny thing to this, which
Speaker 2: I guess people don't care about anymore. There's about thirteen
Speaker 2: reporters at last count that I knew of, that are
Speaker 2: actually imprisoned in foreign countries because why they reported pro
Speaker 2: American stuff in a country and got jailed. And they're
Speaker 2: connected to VOA, So any of their lawyers, any of
Speaker 2: their assistants, any of their connection to the outside world,
Speaker 2: these people might be cut off into prison somewhere for
Speaker 2: thinking they were doing the patriotic thing and getting out
Speaker 2: the truth and sharing the truth with the world and
Speaker 2: being on America's side. Now again, this could all be
Speaker 2: just another way. I mean, some people might say it's true,
Speaker 2: I'm dismantling the deep state and this is just their
Speaker 2: propaganda out let. But Voice of America initially in the
Speaker 2: cover story as it was initiated as a way to
Speaker 2: counter Nazi narratives and all that. But look, we also
Speaker 2: know about paper Clip and how effectively that was just us,
Speaker 2: you know, collecting on our investment in Germany. And when
Speaker 2: I say our, I don't mean you and me, really,
Speaker 2: I mean other Americans like Prescott Bush in the Bank
Speaker 2: of New York City Bank and you know our NASA
Speaker 2: like today, you know, I mean, we got the whole
Speaker 2: thing with There's supposed to be a splash down pretty soon.
Speaker 2: Hopefully those two astronauts are spent nine months in space
Speaker 2: have had enough. And even though Trump was joking about
Speaker 2: them maybe really liking each other, I bet they're looking
Speaker 2: for some time apart at this point because they've been
Speaker 2: together for nine months in the International Space Station. And
Speaker 2: aside from the jokes where the guy shows up with
Speaker 2: an alien head mass and all that, gotta say, I
Speaker 2: don't find it too funny that we had two astronauts
Speaker 2: stuck out there for so long, and they actually did
Speaker 2: send an elon musk rocket telling you, telling you, telling you,
Speaker 2: I would have asked for another ride. You know. It's
Speaker 2: like when the lift shows up and the guy's car
Speaker 2: is barely running, Maybe I should call uber, but ah,
Speaker 2: what can you do? But again, sweeping declarations, sweeping movements.
Speaker 2: Are these all the most strategically wise things to be done.
Speaker 2: And oh, by the way, the way they're being represented
Speaker 2: to you and what the actual impact is might differ
Speaker 2: from the reality just a touch.
Speaker 1: But what the hell's the difference.
Speaker 2: Does anybody care about the news beyond the headline, and
Speaker 2: do they even effectively continue, you know, complete reading the
Speaker 2: headline before passing judgment. If I take a look at
Speaker 2: the stuff out there and again sweeping declarations made by
Speaker 2: even the the information consuming public, I gotta say, I
Speaker 2: don't even know why I bother to talk or to
Speaker 2: break things down or explain anything. Nobody wants an explanation.
Speaker 2: They want to feel right and good about their previously
Speaker 2: held position and have it backed up by something generated
Speaker 2: on the Internet, and then they can go and tweet
Speaker 2: about it or share it on Facebook. I know hardly
Speaker 2: anybody uses Facebook, and I'm criminally locked out now I
Speaker 2: can't get back on my Facebook. But also with Skype
Speaker 2: disappearing in May, I've got one of my tools going away.
Speaker 2: It is interesting. We are in a hate to borrow
Speaker 2: this race from Aaron, but we are in a serious
Speaker 2: age of transition, and I know that some people are
Speaker 2: celebrating as we go, and even I want to celebrate
Speaker 2: some of these changes, and I want to feel good.
Speaker 2: I want to feel good about Maybe there is eighty
Speaker 2: thousand legit pages that that are now being seen that
Speaker 2: we're not seen before. Maybe we can get closer to
Speaker 2: at least the truth of what the government had in
Speaker 2: its hands, oh November twenty second, nineteen sixty three, and
Speaker 2: what it did afterwards. Maybe we could get some of
Speaker 2: that now, Maybe we can get a little closer to
Speaker 2: finally being able to say, look, we knew you were lying,
Speaker 2: and even you knew you were lying. But this new
Speaker 2: administration has no connection and this is kind of on
Speaker 2: our side in a way, has no connection to the past,
Speaker 2: right allegedly, even though these are establishment people, these are billionaires.
Speaker 2: These are people that are on the inside of everything,
Speaker 2: whether it's tech, the technocracy itself, or it is the
Speaker 2: elite circles in this country, and it looks to me
Speaker 2: like more than half of America trusts them. I really
Speaker 2: hope you guys are correct. I really hope you pro
Speaker 2: Trump got you know what. I want you pro Trump
Speaker 2: guys to be right sixty percent of the time, which
Speaker 2: would be an incredibly good record. I want your ideas
Speaker 2: to be correct, because all I see are looming disasters
Speaker 2: and unintended consequences and punishments and reckonings that are gonna
Speaker 2: be due for even the slightest amount of dissent. And
Speaker 2: I say this not out of some paranoid weirdness that's
Speaker 2: only in my head. But there are threats being issued,
Speaker 2: whether you can see them or not, veiled or unveiled.
Speaker 2: And you know what, it's gonna get more and more direct.
Speaker 2: And I don't got to be a Venezuelan gangbanger to
Speaker 2: be in trouble. Matter of fact, here's the thing. Don't
Speaker 2: you approve of the gang bangers getting out of here?
Speaker 2: That's been the you know, debating point of the week
Speaker 2: in talking head news media is everywhere, Well, come on,
Speaker 2: what you want to keep the gang bangers here? No
Speaker 2: nobody does. I mean, unless you're a gang banger. Maybe,
Speaker 2: I mean, maybe you feel lonely if you don't have
Speaker 2: your buddies here and you haven't been busted yet, you're
Speaker 2: a free man. I mean, if you're locked up in
Speaker 2: the shoe, you know, the segregated housing unit for those
Speaker 2: of you who don't know, if you're locked up in
Speaker 2: the shoes somewhere, I mean, maybe you don't care. It's
Speaker 2: cool whatever. If there's a thousand, or there's ten thousand,
Speaker 2: or there's a million of your brothers on the street,
Speaker 2: it's okay. So long as there are some out there,
Speaker 2: and you'll find a way to communicate with them one
Speaker 2: way or another. But for the rest of us, no,
Speaker 2: we don't want the gangbangers here, but we'd like it
Speaker 2: very much, some of us anyway, if there was proof
Speaker 2: outside of the sweeping declarations made. This is my trouble
Speaker 2: with this current age. People are going on their emotional reactions.
Speaker 2: They're going on a lot of things. I try not to,
Speaker 2: really I do. I know it doesn't sound like that.
Speaker 2: If you disagree with me, it definitely doesn't sound like that.
Speaker 2: But I really do try to seek out this little
Speaker 2: thing called evidence when I want to make a tremendously
Speaker 2: sweeping declaration, you know, when I want to do it bigley,
Speaker 2: when I want to make something that the world has
Speaker 2: never seen before, even though this comes from the mouth
Speaker 2: of a man who has no idea what the world
Speaker 2: has seen, because he hasn't been part of the same
Speaker 2: world you and I have been part of. And here's
Speaker 2: the funny thing. Even people who have been witnessed seem
Speaker 2: to not recognize that they've been witnessed to things before
Speaker 2: people are old enough to know better that hope and
Speaker 2: change was sold to them that don't stop believing was
Speaker 2: sold to him. That the need to defend ourselves. We
Speaker 2: got to fight him over there, so we don't fight
Speaker 2: him over here. They had that sold to him. They
Speaker 2: had a lot of bs sold to him. Again, abandon
Speaker 2: all hope and begged for change because the black guy's
Speaker 2: in charge, that's right, or Trump is an outsider. It's
Speaker 2: all the same bs. And is any resembling a solution
Speaker 2: to any of these problems really in hand? It is
Speaker 2: now you don't understand it's actually getting done. Gotta tell
Speaker 2: you gotta be a little more patient and not just
Speaker 2: believe the sweeping declarations. I advise everyone, and I do
Speaker 2: mean everyone, to search for reach for demand evidence when
Speaker 2: someone makes a extraordinary declaration. Extraordinary declarations require verifiable and
Speaker 2: corroboratable and corroborated evidence. They really should, and they just
Speaker 2: don't seem to currently Anyway. A lot of things are
Speaker 2: work in progress. And what is the overall message of
Speaker 2: tonight's podcast. Look, you don't got to stay tuned to me,
Speaker 2: but stay tuned to something because unless you're gonna pay attention,
Speaker 2: they're gonna tell you what to believe. And way way
Speaker 2: too many of you are just going with half a
Speaker 2: headline anymore. You gotta get past that or accept your bliss.
Speaker 2: I e ignorance, by the way, because ignorance must be bliss.
Speaker 2: Some people are very happy with things and believe things
Speaker 2: have happened based on a headline, based on a declaration,
Speaker 2: based on an executive order, based on a truth, social post,
Speaker 2: an ex post, a blue sky post, a dumb ass
Speaker 2: thing thread on Facebook, a Reddit thread. It happened because
Speaker 2: I saw it, I read it. I know it did.
Speaker 2: This guy said it, so it must be. Alex Jones
Speaker 2: continuously says he is the most censored news show out there,
Speaker 2: and some people still believe it and make donations and
Speaker 2: buy stuff they don't need. Even instead of buying come
Speaker 2: on and garbage and blinging whatever from somewhere else, they'll
Speaker 2: buy it from Alex. And if not there, they're still
Speaker 2: going to the Trump twenty twenty four store because now,
Speaker 2: by the way, he has Gulf of America T shirts
Speaker 2: and Doge coffee cups and T shirts and other items
Speaker 2: for you to celebrate. Elon Musk's mug on a mug,
Speaker 2: Trump's mug again on a mug, and Gulf of America
Speaker 2: baby anyway, just because somebody declares it, it doesn't automatically
Speaker 2: make it real. But if you believe it happened, then
Speaker 2: later on, I guess everybody can claim they had a
Speaker 2: Mandela effect. That's not what I remember. I'm getting to
Speaker 2: believe that more and more. It may not be what
Speaker 2: you remember, but it is what happened, and so maybe
Speaker 2: you are completely kicking the legs out from the Mandela
Speaker 2: effect idea, which, by the way, on Friday night, I
Speaker 2: don't know if we're gonna have an Aaron Franz show,
Speaker 2: but we're gonna have something. We might have an Uncle
Speaker 2: show only, in which case we'll catch up on the
Speaker 2: Super Bowl bets. And as I said earlier, I'm gonna
Speaker 2: do another Thursday newsblast like this Wednesday, we'll have Albert
Speaker 2: lanieron to talk about podcasting. I don't know how that's
Speaker 2: gonna go, but I guess we'll see. And I did
Speaker 2: this today. Plus go get the two very interesting and
Speaker 2: very very different podcasts from Sunday that I did here
Speaker 2: on the live stream. James Corbett is one of them
Speaker 2: and Chris Graves the other. But that's that. For the
Speaker 2: eighteenth day of March twenty twenty five, allegedly according to
Speaker 2: that thing we call a calendar. And I appreciate anybody
Speaker 2: who's gonna help me pay the big bill that's gonna
Speaker 2: come up on April fifteenth, less than a month away.
Speaker 2: That's a big bill. And also I'm gonna have to
Speaker 2: purchase some new software and things in order to work
Speaker 2: around and get around the loss of Skype. So any
Speaker 2: help would be appreciated at o'chelly dot com. If you
Speaker 2: make a donation, it will go toward keeping this experiment
Speaker 2: in my media anyway, going, do I matter anymore? I
Speaker 2: don't know, And I'm starting to wonder if I'm gonna care, because,
Speaker 2: after all, maybe I should just make a sweeping declaration.
Speaker 2: I have already compiled and created the greatest archive of
Speaker 2: alternate media podcasts ever assembled. Maybe if I just walk
Speaker 2: around with that kind of you know, arrogant attitude and
Speaker 2: I declare it, maybe it will just be accepted. Is
Speaker 2: that how this should work? Or is somebody gonna, you know,
Speaker 2: I don't know, fact check me on that. Oh god,
Speaker 2: I just uttered a dirty word. Fact check Oh Snopes's garbage.
Speaker 2: Factcheckers are liars, And I know I know, but I'm
Speaker 2: asking you just consider, are you really comfortable with somebody
Speaker 2: else making your decisions for you about what's real, what's
Speaker 2: not real, what actually happened, what didn't happen, or would
Speaker 2: you rather have some verifiable, corroboratable evidence to back up
Speaker 2: extraordinary claims, especially when people want to talk about extraordinary
Speaker 2: things happening the VOA going away not so extraordinary JFK documents.
Speaker 2: Damn it about time if it actually happened, and we
Speaker 2: have to evaluate that. Do people approve of what Trump's doing?
Speaker 2: Looks like it to me, but will they when it
Speaker 2: all actually hits. Oh, by the way, people are telling
Speaker 2: me egg prices are going down. I don't see it here,
Speaker 2: but maybe your experiences are varying. And is it all
Speaker 2: about the eggs? After all, there was the Eggman, it
Speaker 2: was the walrus and cuckooku chew and all that, and
Speaker 2: I guess that was the Beatles. I wasn't a Beatles guy,
Speaker 2: And according to my short conversation with Charles Manson when
Speaker 2: he was still live in the nineteen nineties, he told
Speaker 2: me he wasn't that big a Beatles fan either, But again,
Speaker 2: do you believe him? And what is the evidence. I'm
Speaker 2: trying to book Tom O'Neil, by the way, to come
Speaker 2: on here and talk about the new Netflix release of Chaos.
Speaker 2: But who knows what will happen. And that's the thing.
Speaker 2: Keep an open mind, keep your eyes open, and let
Speaker 2: your own observations guide you a lot more than half.
Speaker 1: A headline if you can. That's the whole point.
Speaker 2: I'm merely o'ceelly. All of you could be the effect.
Speaker 2: Join me, support the network, support what I'm doing. Maybe
Speaker 2: we'll expand some more, or maybe we'll give up after
Speaker 2: Lancer twenty twenty five. Who knows. Let's wait and see.
Speaker 2: But if you show me some support, I'll be more
Speaker 2: likely to stick around and keep it as interesting as
Speaker 2: I can, trying to fact check and check and verify,
Speaker 2: and let's make sure we got the fact straight. Let's
Speaker 2: make sure we got the timeline straight. Yeah, stupid things.
Speaker 2: I do join us on Friday night though, for the
Speaker 2: call in show. If you want to write down the
Speaker 2: number now, it's three one nine five two seven five
Speaker 2: zero one six. I'll say it about one hundred more
Speaker 2: times when we're live on Friday night between eight and
Speaker 2: ten pm Eastern, But for now, one more time, I'm
Speaker 2: merely o'celly. All of you are the.
Speaker 4: Effect revelation through conversation.
Speaker 5: In Denial, Secret Wars with Air Strikes and Tanks by
Speaker 5: Larry Hancock. Secret wars became a staple of US covert
Speaker 5: operations are still happening today. Larryhancock's book In Denial rips
Speaker 5: the cover off many of them, using new files.
Speaker 6: It exposes things about the Bay of Pigs that no
Speaker 6: one has ever written about before. It shows why it
Speaker 6: really failed and why the United States did not earn
Speaker 6: from it. It also shows why other countries today are
Speaker 6: doing secret operations with more success. This is the book
Speaker 6: that puts what some want to deny into the light.
Speaker 6: In Denial, Secret Wars with Air Strikes and Tanks Larryhncock.
Speaker 6: For more information, go to Larry hyphen Hancock dot com.
Speaker 6: Pick up your copy of In Denial at Amazon dot com.
Speaker 2: In Digital or Physical.
Speaker 3: Force, The War State by Michael Swanson explains the great
Speaker 3: national transformation that took place and put the Kennedy presidency
Speaker 3: in the context of the times and reveals never before
Speaker 3: published information about the Cuban missile crisis. President Kennedy would
Speaker 3: not have been assassinated if he had been President two
Speaker 3: hundred years ago. His assassination took place in the context
Speaker 3: of the Cold War and the rise of the national
Speaker 3: security state. Before World War II, the United States was
Speaker 3: a continental republic. In the decade that followed, it became
Speaker 3: an imperial superpower. Generals such as Curtis LeMay not only
Speaker 3: wanted to invade Cuba, but knew that there were short
Speaker 3: range missiles on the island armed with nuclear warheads that
Speaker 3: they could not destroy because they were on mobile launchers.
Speaker 3: Their invasion could have led to a Third World War,
Speaker 3: and they wanted to go to war anyway. The War
Speaker 3: State by Michael Swanson reveals why and will show you
Speaker 3: what President Kennedy was up against.
Speaker 2: For more information, the Warstate dot com.