Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Night Show. As the clock
Speaker 2: strikes thirteen, it's Tuesday, the third of September. Here of
Speaker 2: our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, thanks to GUARD for
Speaker 2: a couple of days off. We're back, and we're going
Speaker 2: to begin with a grave mistake Afghanistan, Arlington Cemetery. What
Speaker 2: was the mistake? Was the mistake of photo op? Was
Speaker 2: a mistake making an issue out of that or by
Speaker 2: either side? Or were there other mistakes that are far
Speaker 2: more consequential that are being missed. We're going to begin
Speaker 2: with that. We're going to take a look at the
Speaker 2: drug wars now back in the headlines thanks to Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: He's now supporting marijuana and the recreational use of it,
Speaker 2: just not where he can smell it, not in his backyard.
Speaker 2: We'll talk about the constitutional legal issues as well as
Speaker 2: the spiritual issues, because it's not a law enforcement issue
Speaker 2: and there isn't any constitutional authority for any of this.
Speaker 2: It's just amazing all over the place on these issues.
Speaker 2: We'll be right back. Stay with us. Well, as I said,
Speaker 2: I want to thank GUARD for a couple of days off.
Speaker 2: Really needed some time off. And as always does a
Speaker 2: great job, great guests, very informative show. And thank you
Speaker 2: also all of you who support the program, especially to
Speaker 2: the love of the Road, thank you for the matching donation.
Speaker 2: We've gotten up to eighty two percent, so that was
Speaker 2: good for the month. We didn't quite make it, but
Speaker 2: you know, things have been things have been kind of
Speaker 2: difficult for us. And I went back tracking what happened
Speaker 2: with our podcasts, and I can trace it back to
Speaker 2: when I put in the title that the pharmaceutical companies
Speaker 2: are murderers. At that point my podcast got cut in half.
Speaker 2: And they've not recovered and still popping around, but the
Speaker 2: podcast got cut in half because of that. What they
Speaker 2: did was the host that we have said a complaint
Speaker 2: has been received. Now I had been on this for well,
Speaker 2: coming up, we just had our seventh anniversary, seven years
Speaker 2: of podcasting. One complaint. Who would it be that can
Speaker 2: make one complaint and get you taken down? Well, of
Speaker 2: course that complainer would be the federal government, right, same
Speaker 2: thing I've seen before with YouTube. You know, just a
Speaker 2: complaint has been received. And they said that to me
Speaker 2: eight thousand times over a couple of months, without ever
Speaker 2: responding to me. They just kept sending it every few
Speaker 2: minutes for a couple of months, and I had it
Speaker 2: rerouted into a file so I could see what the
Speaker 2: total count was going to be. I didn't want to
Speaker 2: just block them, but yeah, just kept sending that same
Speaker 2: message again. So who is it that can make one
Speaker 2: complaint and get you taken down without any explanation, without
Speaker 2: any appeal. Now, the interesting thing about it was that
Speaker 2: they took us down on a Friday. I didn't realize
Speaker 2: it was down. I brought it back up on a Monday,
Speaker 2: after for Love of the Road contacted us and said, hey,
Speaker 2: you realize this down, and so we got it back
Speaker 2: for Monday's broadcast. But then what they did, and I
Speaker 2: didn't realize that for another couple of weeks, they stopped
Speaker 2: after they restored the podcast, they didn't restart the podcast
Speaker 2: being sent out to other people. And so when I
Speaker 2: saw that it was down, I fixed that and I
Speaker 2: thought that would take care of the problem. And you,
Speaker 2: quite frankly, so busy with other stuff, I didn't go
Speaker 2: back and look at the metrics. I don't try not
Speaker 2: to get caught up in metrics in terms of audience
Speaker 2: or dollars or cents or whatever about it, because I
Speaker 2: don't want that to control what I have to say.
Speaker 2: You know, you start looking at that, you start looking
Speaker 2: over your shoulder. Well, what are people going to think
Speaker 2: if I say this? I knew, I knew this is
Speaker 2: going to be a tough year because of the election,
Speaker 2: and it is going to get a lot tougher these
Speaker 2: next couple of months because now people are making their
Speaker 2: final purchasing decision for the presidential American Idol reality TV show,
Speaker 2: that pageant, the presidential pageant American Idol, who are you
Speaker 2: going to vote for? For the finals? And at this point,
Speaker 2: you know, everything leading up to it, you know, people
Speaker 2: are saying, well, I'm going to go for this third
Speaker 2: party canidate, that I'm going to go for this independent
Speaker 2: or you know whatever. But then they jump into this
Speaker 2: lesser two evils. And once they make that decision, then
Speaker 2: they start making all kinds of excuses for Trump. Since
Speaker 2: I'm talking to a conservative audience, that's what happens. They
Speaker 2: start making all kinds of excuses for Donald Trump. Well,
Speaker 2: you know, he's not Kamala Harris. That's true, he's not.
Speaker 2: He'll come after you in a different way. They're both
Speaker 2: your enemy, and neither of them has a solution. The
Speaker 2: solution is to be found locally. The solution is to
Speaker 2: be found individually, you, your family, your community, your state.
Speaker 2: That's where the solutions are. And the solutions, for the
Speaker 2: most part are blocking out the federal government. That's not
Speaker 2: going to happen with either Law Law or Trump. Both
Speaker 2: of them have a long list of activist programs that
Speaker 2: they want to hector you with, and I mean hector
Speaker 2: you with. It's going to be nuisance about this and
Speaker 2: about that. They want to micromanage everything in your life.
Speaker 2: They don't want to get government out of your life.
Speaker 2: They want to put more government into your life. And
Speaker 2: people are supporting that because they want more government against
Speaker 2: those people they don't like on the other side. That's
Speaker 2: how we got here. And they put their hope in
Speaker 2: Trump and they think that if we don't have Trump.
Speaker 2: The conservatives, and I'm seeing this over and over again
Speaker 2: from outlets that I used to respect, that if we
Speaker 2: don't have Trump, it's going to be a civil war.
Speaker 2: The entire magazine cover of The New American it's about, well,
Speaker 2: when is it right for us to attack government? And
Speaker 2: should we do this? And it's getting to be pretty intall,
Speaker 2: that's an inevitable conclusion. If you think that this is
Speaker 2: the most important election of all time, but you're here
Speaker 2: every four years, and if you think that your future
Speaker 2: depends on Trump being in the White House and law
Speaker 2: La being out of the White House, then you're going
Speaker 2: to out of desperation, desperation, out of this narrative of
Speaker 2: fear that is being pushed by conservative media, You're going
Speaker 2: to be ripe for another January the six betrayal. And
Speaker 2: that's what it was. It was a betrayal. Don't fall
Speaker 2: for that again. That's why I talk about this. I
Speaker 2: talk about Trump so that your hope and Trump. If
Speaker 2: your hope is in Trump, you are hopeless. You're a
Speaker 2: hopeless case. You don't know how the game works, you
Speaker 2: don't know who's running the government. You don't have any
Speaker 2: understanding of what happened in the last four years. Nothing, nothing,
Speaker 2: So let's take a look. There was a grave mistake made.
Speaker 2: So what was the mistake? Who made it? Was it
Speaker 2: Trump or La law Trump releases a statement from GoldStar
Speaker 2: Families Harris's disgracefully twisted Trump Cemetery visit into a political ploy. Well,
Speaker 2: Trump was doing a political ploy as well, wasn't he
Speaker 2: on the anniversary of the thirteen deaths? And again it
Speaker 2: was at the very beginning of the Biden administration in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty one. All of the casualties in the Biden
Speaker 2: administration happened on that one day as they were retreating
Speaker 2: from Afghanistan. It was a disorderly, disorganized, incompetent bugout. And
Speaker 2: Biden owns that, and he owns the death of these
Speaker 2: thirteen people, that is absolutely for sure. But what about
Speaker 2: the thousands of people that died before that under Obama
Speaker 2: and Biden? What about that? What about the people died
Speaker 2: under Trump? How many people you think died under Trump?
Speaker 2: Why did they die? What were they doing? Why were
Speaker 2: we still there? And so both of them are using
Speaker 2: this as a political ploy. Trump released a statement from
Speaker 2: gold Star families of thirteen fallen US service members who
Speaker 2: were killed and that retreat, and the families wrote in
Speaker 2: their joint statement that Lalla's statement labeling Trump's visit to
Speaker 2: Arlington National Cemetery to take part in a wreath laying
Speaker 2: ceremony to honor the family's lost loved ones and fallen
Speaker 2: service members a political stunt. That's what she called it.
Speaker 2: They said, that's false, hypocritical, and disrespectful. And of course
Speaker 2: the Biden administration and La LA have absolutely no respect.
Speaker 2: They don't even pretend. Trump at least pretends. But if
Speaker 2: he had any respect, he would have brought the servicemen
Speaker 2: home and ended the war in Afghanistan before Biden never
Speaker 2: took office, wouldn't he. So it depends do you want
Speaker 2: the guy that pretends to have respect for the soldiers
Speaker 2: or do you want the people who just are out
Speaker 2: front thaying we don't have respect for them all. Who's
Speaker 2: more dangerous, by the way, is it the enemy that
Speaker 2: you know or the enemy that you don't know, somebody
Speaker 2: who will send you off to die in war and
Speaker 2: then tell you you're great American and how much we love you,
Speaker 2: even though there was no reason for it. Oh there
Speaker 2: was a reason, but not a reason for those of
Speaker 2: us who live in America. There was a reason for
Speaker 2: the American empire to do that, not for you to go.
Speaker 3: So.
Speaker 2: In a statement, the families added that Harris had disgracefully
Speaker 2: twisted this sacred moment into a political ploy. We have
Speaker 2: the families of the brave service members who are tragically
Speaker 2: killed at the abbey Gate bombing are appalled by Vice
Speaker 2: President Lalla's recent attempts to politici guys Trump's visit to
Speaker 2: Arlington National Cemetery. Trump was invited by US. Here's what
Speaker 2: one of them I had.
Speaker 4: To say, Vice President Harris, my name is Christy Shamblin.
Speaker 4: My daughter in law, Sergeant Nicole Leanne Ge, was killed
Speaker 4: in the Afghanistan exit at Abbey Gate on August twenty sixth,
Speaker 4: twenty twenty one. This year, for the third year anniversary
Speaker 4: of her murder, we welcome President Donald J. Trump to
Speaker 4: Arlington to lay a reef on the tomb of the
Speaker 4: unknown soldier with our family and to visit Nicole graveside.
Speaker 4: President Trump and his team were respectful. They listened to
Speaker 4: our stories and didn't talk much at all. We welcomed
Speaker 4: them that day and they were comfort to our family.
Speaker 4: Vice President Harris, I ask you, why won't you return
Speaker 4: a call and explain to us how you call my
Speaker 4: daughter in law's death a success. Vice President Harris, why
Speaker 4: will you not express your condolences yourself? Why have we
Speaker 4: never heard from you? And finally, why would you take
Speaker 4: a day where we celebrated the death of our loved
Speaker 4: one and use it to disparage not only them but US.
Speaker 4: President Trump has called President Trump shows up. President Trump
Speaker 4: takes the time to hear our loved one stories.
Speaker 2: Why won't you do the same, So Trump called, he
Speaker 2: heard their stories, he showed up. You know, we had
Speaker 2: George W. Bush visit soldiers who had survived in the
Speaker 2: hospital for a war that was unnecessary, for a war
Speaker 2: that he put us into based on lies from the CIA,
Speaker 2: based on torture that the CIA had conducted. Does that
Speaker 2: make it better? Is it okay to send somebody to
Speaker 2: a useless war, kill and maim them, and then come
Speaker 2: around and pretend that you're sympathetic about this. You don't
Speaker 2: have any sympathy for these people if you're creating wars
Speaker 2: for no reason at all. Stop the phony bs. Yes,
Speaker 2: Harris killed my son, said one gold starter. Yes she did.
Speaker 2: She did, Biden did, Trump did. They all had a
Speaker 2: hand in it. Let's get over this partisanship here. Let's
Speaker 2: understand that we want to have peace and we want
Speaker 2: to be left alone. Very all. Well, it was Biden
Speaker 2: who mandated the vaccines. I knew better than to take it.
Speaker 2: It's on you if you took it. Trump just pushed
Speaker 2: this poison out there and told everybody is the greatest solution.
Speaker 2: But if you believed him, that's on you. But he's
Speaker 2: going to save us. That type of thing I tell
Speaker 2: you talk about, you know, Trump derangement of the left
Speaker 2: over Trump's personality. How about trump delusion of the magatards
Speaker 2: and they are tards. It's unbelievable. There was no orderly
Speaker 2: withdrawal because we lost that war and long after, you know,
Speaker 2: we went there because supposedly they were the ones who
Speaker 2: started nine to eleven, who did nine eleven? Our own
Speaker 2: government dead nine to eleven? Why didn't we go to
Speaker 2: Afghanistan the first place? Because it was necessary to cover
Speaker 2: up the line, and because they had other designs on this,
Speaker 2: and that's why they said we're not ever going to leave.
Speaker 2: I reported on this a decade ago. You had American
Speaker 2: military leadership, the CIA, the Pentagon, the real government that
Speaker 2: you don't get to vote for in this empire. They said,
Speaker 2: we're never leaving Afghanistan. Why, well, the Taliban had gotten
Speaker 2: the worldwide supply of opioid down to only about ten
Speaker 2: percent of it coming from Afghanistan under the leadership of
Speaker 2: the CIA. We got that up to over ninety percent
Speaker 2: every year, record crops every year, because the CIA is
Speaker 2: the biggest pusher of drugs and wars and torture and
Speaker 2: the rest of this, and so they were staying for
Speaker 2: the opioid material, and of course we had an opioid
Speaker 2: epidemic here. I wonder if there's any connection. I'm sure
Speaker 2: it's just a coincidence. And then you have the lithium
Speaker 2: that's there, massive stores of lithium, and there may be
Speaker 2: some geopolitical reasons for them to have troops positioned there
Speaker 2: in regards to other countries. But look, we didn't have
Speaker 2: a dog in that fight, not you and I, not
Speaker 2: the American people, unless we had family members who were
Speaker 2: in the military who were being used and abused by
Speaker 2: Biden and by Obama and by Trump and by Harris.
Speaker 2: Because they don't have any respect for anything, No more
Speaker 2: respect for these people than Kissinger dead. He treats them
Speaker 2: like animals. He referred to them as animals, expendable animals,
Speaker 2: because you know, you're not essential, not essential of their plans,
Speaker 2: your business, your life, your plans are not essential to them.
Speaker 2: They're in the way, got to shut you down, like
Speaker 2: they did in twenty twenty, Like Trump said in twenty twenty,
Speaker 2: you're not essential. Hillary thinks you're deplorable. Trump thinks you're
Speaker 2: not essential. The real government, the government that you don't
Speaker 2: vote for, the Empire, wanted a permanent presence there in Afghanistan.
Speaker 2: So Trump didn't shut the war down. And so then
Speaker 2: on to Meet the Press yesterday we had Tom Cotton,
Speaker 2: and he was criticizing LA Law from not meeting with
Speaker 2: the people whose family members had been sacrificed for the
Speaker 2: geopolitics and the drug wars of our empire. And so
Speaker 2: he criticized LA Law. And then you have the Meet
Speaker 2: the Press shil Kristen Welker, who runs NBC's Meet the Press.
Speaker 2: Now she lied to cover up for Ala Harris. She said, no,
Speaker 2: she met with the gold star families of the troops
Speaker 2: in Afghanistan. No, she never did, never did. But isn't
Speaker 2: it interesting that Tom Cotton would make such a big
Speaker 2: deal out of this, because you know, there's probably no
Speaker 2: bigger warmonger anywhere except for Lindsay Graham. Then Tom Cotton.
Speaker 2: This guy's got blood on his hands. Tom Cotton, Yeah,
Speaker 2: never saw a war that he didn't want to get
Speaker 2: us involved in. Just like Lindsay Graham, and then when
Speaker 2: people get killed, he pretends to care a little bit
Speaker 2: too late. Then Tom tell us why we're there first,
Speaker 2: that's what you're supposed to another constitution. And so if
Speaker 2: we go back and look at the casualty figures from Obama,
Speaker 2: which was the two thousand and nine through twenty sixteen,
Speaker 2: that was the mass of people who were killed in Afghanistan,
Speaker 2: far more than in previous years. In two thousand and one,
Speaker 2: of course they went there at the end of the
Speaker 2: year eleven people, but in all of two thousand and two,
Speaker 2: forty nine people. That was the big war that was happening.
Speaker 2: But by the time we got to Obama and we
Speaker 2: had mc crystal and we had portray us, and they're
Speaker 2: going to do their surges. The Sage, right, the Sage,
Speaker 2: just like Fauci right, be careful when they start talking
Speaker 2: about surg what they mean is mass murder of Americans typically,
Speaker 2: So at that point in time, it started getting up
Speaker 2: in the just about almost five hundred a couple of
Speaker 2: years there during the Obama administration. Then during the Trump administration,
Speaker 2: people continued to die in Afghanistan. As he continued to
Speaker 2: stay there. Americans continued to die. And so during Trump's
Speaker 2: four years, we had sixty five people die. So that
Speaker 2: is that's a little bit more than the thirteen that
Speaker 2: died in the first and that as they left on
Speaker 2: average per year, right, And but we don't pay attention
Speaker 2: to that. Did did Trump lay any rereads on those
Speaker 2: sixty five graves of the people who died because he
Speaker 2: didn't end the war in Afghanistan? It's all about the
Speaker 2: photo op, folks. This entire presidential campaign is all about
Speaker 2: the photo op. And we're the ones who make a
Speaker 2: grave mistake when we forget the issues, when we forget
Speaker 2: and excuse what these people have done. On both sides,
Speaker 2: they both got blood on their hands. One of them
Speaker 2: pretends to care, the other one doesn't even pretend to care. Oh,
Speaker 2: is that going to be the difference? You're fine if
Speaker 2: people get killed as long as Trump pretends to care.
Speaker 2: Is that Okay? Well that's some consolation, isn't it. It's amazing.
Speaker 2: So yeah, big big surge under Obama, we could call
Speaker 2: it the Obiden administration. And seventeen hundred and fifty two
Speaker 2: people died over those eight years, most of them during
Speaker 2: the sage stuff. And then it dropped down. Last year
Speaker 2: Obama was in office, ten people died. It got up
Speaker 2: to four hundred ninety eight in twenty ten, but in
Speaker 2: twenty sixteen, ten people died. Continued to die. Fifteen people
Speaker 2: died under Trump in twenty seventeen, then sixteen, then twenty three,
Speaker 2: then eleven. Every year there were fifteen sixteen people that
Speaker 2: died under Trump, but the thirteen who died under Biden.
Speaker 2: They want to make that a political issue. It is
Speaker 2: a political issue because this war was about geopolitics. It
Speaker 2: wasn't about defending America. America wasn't threatened. We didn't have
Speaker 2: Afghans fly planes into these buildings. They collapsed. We had
Speaker 2: two planes and three steel buildings just collapsed into their
Speaker 2: own footprint after a couple of hours. Seriously, you believe that,
Speaker 2: then maybe you believe that Trump is the good guy
Speaker 2: and all this stuff as well. He and Rudy Giuliani
Speaker 2: nine to eleven. Rudy who was involved in the cover
Speaker 2: up of nine to eleven. We're going to take a
Speaker 2: quick break and we'll be right back. Before we go,
Speaker 2: I just saw Travis put this up on rock Fan
Speaker 2: Brian and McCartney could use some prayers Brian's sister passed
Speaker 2: away Sunday morning, second sibling he has lost in less
Speaker 2: than two months. I am so sorry to hear that.
Speaker 2: I am so sorry. I don't know, certainly don't understand
Speaker 2: what is behind it, but regardless, it's the loss of
Speaker 2: a sibling, and I'm so sorry to hear that. But
Speaker 2: you are both Christians, and so I hope you have
Speaker 2: that hope in christ Christians. Then I just pray that
Speaker 2: God will give you peace.
Speaker 1: And all of that.
Speaker 2: We'll be right back. Stay with us, Ah, your listen
Speaker 2: to the David Knight Show. Well, let me go over
Speaker 2: some emails and I've received over the last few days.
Speaker 2: This one is from Dave who says, well, here's the
Speaker 2: US progress and setting things up for people to be
Speaker 2: able to mark themselves when the time comes. Homeland Security
Speaker 2: is looking at biometric agenda. Of course they are. Every
Speaker 2: government on Earth is doing the same thing exactly the
Speaker 2: same time. They're all looking at biometric stuff, They're all
Speaker 2: looking at IDs. It's just the question is what excuse
Speaker 2: are they going to use. Is it going to be
Speaker 2: an emergency or it's just well, we got to have
Speaker 2: it because of this chaos that we've caused, we've got
Speaker 2: open borders, so now we need to have IDs in
Speaker 2: order to get jobs or to vote. That'll be from
Speaker 2: the Republican side. From the other side, all we kind
Speaker 2: of have IDs because we need to be able to
Speaker 2: track extremists like you. Of course, there's so many different
Speaker 2: excuses that they can make, but they want an ID
Speaker 2: for everything to tag and to track us like cattle.
Speaker 2: It says, Trump Advance seem best equipped to loot and
Speaker 2: oversee the implementation of these technocratic projects. In my opinion, yeah,
Speaker 2: because you know, like I said, both sides have got
Speaker 2: all kinds of excuses. You know, we need to On
Speaker 2: the left, they got to control the amount of fuel
Speaker 2: that we use and the amount of carbon we consume
Speaker 2: in terms of food and energy and clothing and housing
Speaker 2: and all the rest. Every activity has got to be tracked.
Speaker 2: So far, oh, we got to be tracked because of
Speaker 2: disease or this or that. And then on the right
Speaker 2: they've got their own excuses. So who's going to resist this, Well,
Speaker 2: the Christians would unless it's Trump Advance, and then of
Speaker 2: course will be told by the clergy that tell us
Speaker 2: that no good Christian is going to vote against Trump
Speaker 2: and I'm not saying to vote against Trump. I'm not
Speaker 2: telling you who to vote for. I don't care. Frankly,
Speaker 2: I don't care between Trump and La La. I could
Speaker 2: not care less. You need to pay attention to your
Speaker 2: local and state elections, and pay attention to your life.
Speaker 2: Start making provisions for your life. Understand where the threats
Speaker 2: are coming from, and they're going to be a little
Speaker 2: bit different threat depending on which one of these people
Speaker 2: is selected by the people who choose. You're not choosing
Speaker 2: the president, so wake up. You never choose the president.
Speaker 2: They're chosen by the real government. As a puppet spokesperson
Speaker 2: that is out there, you don't have any more choice
Speaker 2: over who the president is going to be than you
Speaker 2: do who the White House spokesperson is going to be,
Speaker 2: because that's what the president is, so the White House
Speaker 2: spokesperson for the empire, and then of course that person
Speaker 2: has a spokesperson. Do you really think that that Biden
Speaker 2: is running the country? You really think the president's running
Speaker 2: the country? You think that Biden has been running the
Speaker 2: country for the last three or four years. Come on,
Speaker 2: you know that he's not running the country. He spent
Speaker 2: forty percent of his time in office on vacation and
Speaker 2: then sixty percent of it trying to figure out where
Speaker 2: he is in the White House. I mean, he's absolutely
Speaker 2: out of it. That's the one good thing about the
Speaker 2: Biden administration. Well two good things. People realize that Biden
Speaker 2: is coming after them, and so they push back and
Speaker 2: they resist and they refuse to comply when Trump is there.
Speaker 2: Oh well, yeah, I know he's a Republican and he's
Speaker 2: a you know, he's a Republican. He's a Democrat, but
Speaker 2: they think he's a Republican. And you got people like
Speaker 2: Alex Jones, and you've got Mark Levin, and you got
Speaker 2: all of the talking heads, Glenn Back, everybody on the right, Tucker, Carlsontoni.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, he's on your side. Okay, Well good, he's
Speaker 2: just playing forty chess. It looks like he's betraying me,
Speaker 2: but that's just forty chess. That's just to confuse the
Speaker 2: bad people. When he does this kind of stuff, he's
Speaker 2: actually still on my side. He's just a secret supporter
Speaker 2: of ours, right, And so that's how these people run
Speaker 2: this thing through. So it just depends, right. I think
Speaker 2: what they want is a civil war and unrest. They
Speaker 2: want open borders for that. They want contested elections. People
Speaker 2: who feel they've been disenfranchised. They want that kind of frustration.
Speaker 2: And so the question is who better to give it
Speaker 2: to them? And I can't predict the election because I
Speaker 2: don't know the mind of these people and how they
Speaker 2: plan on using this stuff. I just know that, you know,
Speaker 2: if it's Trump and Vince, the Christians will lie down
Speaker 2: and they'll do what they're told, just like they were
Speaker 2: told by so many Christian leaders and twenty twenty. Do
Speaker 2: what you're told. Stay away from church, stay home, don't
Speaker 2: come in. We don't want to meet together, you know
Speaker 2: all things. Christians don't want to die, right, We don't
Speaker 2: want to do anything that could kill us because who
Speaker 2: knows what would happen? Then, right, you have no confidence
Speaker 2: in your religion, so he says. I believe it will
Speaker 2: become the Biblical market of the Beast once it's globally interoperable,
Speaker 2: globally mandated that we have to obediately submit to the
Speaker 2: anti Christian values of global state, present our biometric right
Speaker 2: hand or fore head, our face and eyes, or biometrics
Speaker 2: in order to be approved for making financial transactions. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I think so, And isn't it interesting? Isn't it interesting?
Speaker 2: Why would anybody think two thousand years ago, some guy's
Speaker 2: exiled on an island, where do you come up with
Speaker 2: this kind of a scheme. It's almost like it's a
Speaker 2: prophecy or something. You know, It's like, where did you
Speaker 2: come up with this? It truly is amazing and people
Speaker 2: can't see it. Truly is amazing. Handy Andy says masks
Speaker 2: are back in Atlanta. He said, just a quick update
Speaker 2: from Atlanta. He said, I visited the second hospital system
Speaker 2: in my area to reinstate mask mandates, the Emery. The
Speaker 2: hospital system was the last to relinquish their mask mandate
Speaker 2: the last time. Now they're the first hospital system here
Speaker 2: to bring back the man's mask mandates because he works
Speaker 2: in the ms and you know, a mandate that he
Speaker 2: put a mask on to bring sick people in and
Speaker 2: put a mask on the sick people too. Today, he said,
Speaker 2: I noticed that the Children's Healthcare of Atlanta has followed suit.
Speaker 2: Both of their main campuses are practically neighbors with the CDC,
Speaker 2: which is headquartered in Atlanta. He said, you think it's
Speaker 2: a coincidence that those two hospital systems would be the
Speaker 2: first to mandate masks again, probably not, And he says,
Speaker 2: I'm still seeing younger people. By the way, he sent
Speaker 2: some pictures of what looks like here. Here's the masking policy.
Speaker 2: We're seeing an increase I'm very sick kids and teens employment,
Speaker 2: the spread of illness. All visitors over the age of
Speaker 2: two required to wear a mask in our urgent cares
Speaker 2: and emergency departments. There you go, so he's got to
Speaker 2: wear Any hospital or medical facility that tells you that
Speaker 2: a mask is going to help the spread of illness,
Speaker 2: it's just disqualify themselves. They don't understand anything about medicine
Speaker 2: or science. They're about making money and they're about complying
Speaker 2: with government orders. They're not about science, they're not about medicine.
Speaker 2: Then this, there's another one. Masks are required due to
Speaker 2: the rise and respiratory viruses. Masks are required for patients
Speaker 2: investors over the age of two. And yet another one
Speaker 2: health alert for our visitors mask up. They have the
Speaker 2: instructions in English and Spanish. Isn't that nice? It is
Speaker 2: nice not to see that here in Tennessee. It's almost
Speaker 2: you get to the point. At first it was your
Speaker 2: shock to come to an area where all the signs
Speaker 2: were in English and English only, and then you start
Speaker 2: to go back and see some of these and that's
Speaker 2: just in Atlanta, English and Spanish. Now we need to
Speaker 2: have a language that is the official language. Nevertheless, he says,
Speaker 2: I'm seeing younger people with cancer, still seeing people with
Speaker 2: new and unexplained cardiac problem, and still have the occasional
Speaker 2: sudden death sudden adult death syndrome. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: you don't we talk about the masks. There was an
Speaker 2: article mainstream articles, Oh, we got a mask and it
Speaker 2: can measure all kinds of diseases and stuff. You know,
Speaker 2: it gets trapped in the mask and it's like, yeah,
Speaker 2: that's what we've been telling you. It doesn't really. You're
Speaker 2: eliminating waste, right, That's why we call them a face diaper.
Speaker 2: That's why people get a diaper rash on their face
Speaker 2: when they wear this, because they're dirty. Your body eliminates
Speaker 2: waste through your breath, and you're speaking of that type
Speaker 2: of thing, just like it eliminates waste in the areas
Speaker 2: where you would normally use a diaper. Politicians and diapers
Speaker 2: need to be changed frequently and for the same reason,
Speaker 2: and so do masks chance of politicians, and wonder which
Speaker 2: one of them is going to put a mask on?
Speaker 2: Is like musical chairs or Russian You know which which
Speaker 2: one of these guys is more likely to put a
Speaker 2: mask on me? Rockman? Actually none of them. I never
Speaker 2: complied with this. That's the and that's the point. You know,
Speaker 2: it is the hill to die on. The hill to
Speaker 2: die on is not in Washington, d C. The hill
Speaker 2: to die on is not Capitol Hill. On January sixth,
Speaker 2: as Alex was downing everybody, he told me the hill
Speaker 2: to dieon was not to argue with my dentist who
Speaker 2: was going to require me to wear a mask to
Speaker 2: come in so I could work on on my on
Speaker 2: my open mouth shooting air and water and everything flying
Speaker 2: all over the place. You know, out of my mouth.
Speaker 2: You're you're worried about what's in my mouth? Well just wait.
Speaker 2: But you know that was the hill to die on,
Speaker 2: the individual little hills to die on to fight that stuff.
Speaker 2: So he's telling me that. A couple of months, he's
Speaker 2: telling everybody, go die on Capitol Hill. I'll be there
Speaker 2: with you. I'll be coming soon. Okay, just you guys,
Speaker 2: go ahead, I'll be there shortly, says Trump and says
Speaker 2: Alex as they run to the other side of Washington
Speaker 2: Rock Fans sow one forty four. Thank you for the tip.
Speaker 2: I got my biometric tracking and planted this morning, and
Speaker 2: all I have to say about it is move, glad
Speaker 2: your bag and fired up dated God bless you and
Speaker 2: your family. Thank you very much. On rumble Stealth Patriot,
Speaker 2: thank you as well. With every proposal, every piece of legislation,
Speaker 2: and every executive order, no matter how good it sounds
Speaker 2: at the time, I usually have to ask myself only
Speaker 2: one question, how can this be used against me? Yes,
Speaker 2: that's right. And unfortunately, because of this Hegelian fight that
Speaker 2: they have built up with us, right, we only typically
Speaker 2: look at the people who are caught up in this election,
Speaker 2: caught up in this political party stuff. Well, how can
Speaker 2: this be used against my opponent? These are the same
Speaker 2: people who just celebrate and do happy dances whenever the
Speaker 2: other side gets owned as they put it over something. Right, Oh,
Speaker 2: look at this, we really expose them, we really call
Speaker 2: them out, we really trip them whatever. You know. They
Speaker 2: get so excited about that, and it's like, and how
Speaker 2: exactly does that help you? That make a difference in
Speaker 2: your life? Does it really?
Speaker 1: Oh?
Speaker 2: Yeah, well it helps our side to win. Okay, your
Speaker 2: side wins, and then what happens. I'm sorry. I've been
Speaker 2: around this thing for far too long. I've seen Republicans win,
Speaker 2: I've seen Republicans lose. I've seen Democrats win. I've seen
Speaker 2: democrats lose. And it always just means more government. In
Speaker 2: different ways, yes, but always means more government. Uh so,
Speaker 2: burning Man, this is sent by Sam. He said, yeah,
Speaker 2: so what's happening at burning Man? What you know? Are
Speaker 2: they worried about their private jets? Of course not, unfortunately,
Speaker 2: burning Man, They're not even worried about their private parts
Speaker 2: on their private jets. I couldn't believe it. When I
Speaker 2: was at in for Wars and a couple of people
Speaker 2: went to that thing. It's like, you went to that
Speaker 2: Are you kidding me? That's I won't name any names there,
Speaker 2: but one of them was pretty high up. It's like, Man,
Speaker 2: I actually talked to some people. I can't verify this
Speaker 2: stuff is true, but it certainly does ring true to me.
Speaker 2: I talked to somebody, a couple of Christians who were
Speaker 2: doing who were reporters and documentary filmmakers. And stuff. They
Speaker 2: said they went burning man document was going on there
Speaker 2: and they said that they were told there was this
Speaker 2: tent over there, and they said, yeah, you can't go
Speaker 2: over there. You know, that's a bunch of billionaires. And
Speaker 2: you know they're coming in from Silicon Valley and they're
Speaker 2: doing DMT and they're getting tech tips from the metal
Speaker 2: what they call them, the metal elves, metallic elves. You
Speaker 2: know the people see when they do d MT, it's like, yeah, man,
Speaker 2: I went to this alternate universe and I met these
Speaker 2: demons or maybe they were help and we were technology
Speaker 2: and it's pretty much the same experience that all these
Speaker 2: people are having, which got a lot of these people
Speaker 2: to say, maybe this is something that's real, maybe we
Speaker 2: should investigate this. And so they're actually trying to do
Speaker 2: some I don't know, I'm followed up on this. That's
Speaker 2: it's not my thing really, but they were going to
Speaker 2: start having people do this and document it and you know,
Speaker 2: interact with the elves and all this other kind of
Speaker 2: stuff that they've met. And they actually called themselves psycho knots,
Speaker 2: not nuts nuts, Psycho nuts is what we would call them.
Speaker 2: They called themselves psycho knots as in an astro knot
Speaker 2: in a U T s. And you know they're going
Speaker 2: to this all this other reality, this other plane, meeting
Speaker 2: these spiritual beings. They say, yeah, well, you know that's
Speaker 2: the spirits to see what they're from. And I wouldn't
Speaker 2: be surprised at all if they were downloading tech from
Speaker 2: the these people, the billionaires. Of course, you know what
Speaker 2: about their carbon footprints? Yeah, what about it when they
Speaker 2: burn these things and anything? Is that? Does that matter
Speaker 2: to anybody? Of course that doesn't. And then that's from Will.
Speaker 2: He says. The media is working overtime distracting paralyzed American
Speaker 2: public with fear is it? Just think about what we've
Speaker 2: seen over the last few weeks. As a summary, We've
Speaker 2: got mosquito transmitted disease, so they say, if the bugs
Speaker 2: don't kill you, the spring will. We've got a listeria
Speaker 2: outbreak at Borshead and I got more information about that
Speaker 2: as well. What's really behind that bird flew in? Cows,
Speaker 2: monkey pots, weather events, whatever the weather is, it's your fault.
Speaker 2: You're eating too much meat, you're eating dairy, and you
Speaker 2: got a car. Of course the weather's bad. I'm just
Speaker 2: thinking if you brought back somebody like Mark Twain and
Speaker 2: these people. He would just have a blast looking at
Speaker 2: this stuff. First of all, would be saying, I couldn't
Speaker 2: even make this stuff up. You used to say, everybody
Speaker 2: talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it.
Speaker 2: Well they do. Now they talk about weather, and then
Speaker 2: they punish us for it. Yeah, they think of well, okay,
Speaker 2: look at this, I've got weather. That means that I
Speaker 2: can do this to you. Now, you know that type
Speaker 2: of thing. Airline travel issues, everything is failing. Yeah, that's
Speaker 2: another whole issue. Break down a society, and that's intentional.
Speaker 2: The war in Ukraine and Gaza all under false narratives
Speaker 2: and pretenses. We're actually in World War three. Yeah, absolutely,
Speaker 2: I would add to the list the migrant anarchy. We're
Speaker 2: going to talk about that in a moment too. And
Speaker 2: then this as we come back, we're going to talk
Speaker 2: a little bit about the drug war. And this is
Speaker 2: from JT and so we're going to take a quick
Speaker 2: break and when we come back, we're going to talk
Speaker 2: about the drug war. Say well, this will be right.
Speaker 1: Back making sense.
Speaker 2: Comment again, you're listening to the David Knight Show. Let
Speaker 2: me say just before we get back into the news
Speaker 2: talk about the drug war and what's happening with that.
Speaker 2: This was from Dawn in Australia in Victoria, Australia. He says,
Speaker 2: this is a longtime contributor via subscribe Star. I've often
Speaker 2: heard you mention I can listen to your podcasts without ads. There.
Speaker 2: Given that I have had enough of the interruptions during
Speaker 2: your broadcast, I would like to take it vantage of
Speaker 2: the ad free service. Unfortunately, I have no idea how
Speaker 2: to do this. Could you please point me to the
Speaker 2: information that allows this to happen. Yeah, let me explain
Speaker 2: what's going on with especially first of all, for the
Speaker 2: subscribe Star people, we really do appreciate your support, and
Speaker 2: even at the lowest level five dollars a month, and
Speaker 2: that's a lot more than we would make out of
Speaker 2: ad revenue for if you listen to every minute of
Speaker 2: every ad throughout the throughout the month. And so what
Speaker 2: we do is we also have a link at each
Speaker 2: day we put on subscribe Star a description. We have
Speaker 2: the same description this in the the you know, the
Speaker 2: time codes and all the different topics and anything is
Speaker 2: in the description for the show. Because some places will
Speaker 2: attenuate that depending on how many characters they allow, and
Speaker 2: so we put that there the subjects as well as
Speaker 2: a time code, and then we have links to the
Speaker 2: different places that is on video. So we have links
Speaker 2: to Rumble. I think we've got a link to the
Speaker 2: Rumble with a subtitle. We have a link to Odyssey,
Speaker 2: to Bitshoot, and then we have for the people on
Speaker 2: subscribe Start a link to the audio podcasts that is
Speaker 2: ad free. Because those other podcasts, except for Rumble, I
Speaker 2: don't think the other podcasts put any ads on anything.
Speaker 2: Now Rumble does put that on. We don't make any
Speaker 2: revenue from that. It's just Rumble covering their charges, their expenses,
Speaker 2: I guess. But the podcast, hopefully we've got a lot
Speaker 2: of ads that get put in that very a great
Speaker 2: deal from month to month, depending on what advertisers are buying.
Speaker 2: You know, they buy it through iHeart, So we don't
Speaker 2: have any control over that really or what they put on.
Speaker 2: But we do make available a broadcast that does not
Speaker 2: have ads in it. And again when we put the
Speaker 2: time codes in for the podcast, they're kind of approximate
Speaker 2: and we can't really tell because we don't know how
Speaker 2: many ads are going to be filling into the different slots.
Speaker 2: We don't know how long those ads are going to be,
Speaker 2: so what we do is we put time codes in
Speaker 2: there for something that doesn't have any ads, and so
Speaker 2: it's pretty close for those. But once the ad you're
Speaker 2: listening to a podcast that's got the ads in it,
Speaker 2: they're going to be all over the place and they
Speaker 2: get inserted automatically. We tried to put them in close
Speaker 2: to where I took breaks, but then things get shifted anyway,
Speaker 2: and so now we just let them make their best
Speaker 2: guess effort. So that's what's happening. If it breaks in
Speaker 2: the middle of something that I'm saying, it thinks because
Speaker 2: I paused for a moment that I'm stopping. But yeah,
Speaker 2: for the people who are on subscribe Star, and we
Speaker 2: really do appreciate that we don't do enough, I think
Speaker 2: to acknowledge the people on subscribe Star, but that really
Speaker 2: is a core base of our funding, and we do
Speaker 2: appreciate that. We're trying to think of things that we
Speaker 2: could do. So if you've got some ideas of things
Speaker 2: that you would like to see that we could do,
Speaker 2: if it's possible for us to make something available, we'd
Speaker 2: like to do more for the people on subscribe Star,
Speaker 2: but all of them have access to the podcast without
Speaker 2: any ads in it, and you be able to in
Speaker 2: a video format get it without ads. I think on
Speaker 2: bit shooting on Odyssey, is that right, Travis, I think
Speaker 2: he doesn't know. I haven't but I don't think they
Speaker 2: put ads on it. But we do have the audio
Speaker 2: podcast without ads, and we have a link and put
Speaker 2: that there every day at the top of the entry
Speaker 2: there on a subscribe Star.
Speaker 5: And then at the end of the week, I upload
Speaker 5: the articles that we have gone through over the week.
Speaker 2: So yes, just all of those, the full list. Yes, yes,
Speaker 2: do that at the end of the week. And so
Speaker 2: that's the I send Travis. Every day. I send him
Speaker 2: articles and so he puts them all up at the
Speaker 2: end of the week. It's kind of a weekap he
Speaker 2: want to go back and find the sources because we
Speaker 2: had a lot of people say, you know this show
Speaker 2: such as I show you you talked about this or that,
Speaker 2: and so he puts them up and they're kind of
Speaker 2: roughly organized by topic and by day. Right, but the
Speaker 2: same thing I send you. So let's talk a little
Speaker 2: bit about this from JT. Righty says Trump wants to
Speaker 2: execute all drug dealers and go to war with Mexico.
Speaker 2: That's what he said in the Pennsylvania rally. He's going
Speaker 2: to rest anyone who's ever touched narcotics, illegal narcotics, and
Speaker 2: create a new Blitzkrieg economy using slave labor in prison camps.
Speaker 2: He's excited about that. As a matter of fact, it's
Speaker 2: he's all over the place. Basically, you don't know what
Speaker 2: he's going to do. But I'll just tell you this,
Speaker 2: whatever he does, good or bad, it's forty chess. It's
Speaker 2: for your benefit. So just trust him. Right. Yeah. So
Speaker 2: here he is in Pennsylvania rally on Saturday, talking about
Speaker 2: the death penalty for drugs.
Speaker 6: They kill five hundred people during a lifetime, and I
Speaker 6: think it's much worse than that. I think that's only
Speaker 6: what we hear about.
Speaker 2: It would stop.
Speaker 6: If you didn't get it down seventy five, eighty ninety
Speaker 6: percent from day one, I'd be surprised. And these committees
Speaker 6: that they set up, it's laughable. It's a horrible thing.
Speaker 6: We would solve that problem so fast. And I'm calling
Speaker 6: on Republicans and Democrats immediately to institute to get to
Speaker 6: Washington and institute the death penalty for drug dealers.
Speaker 1: You will no longer have a problem.
Speaker 2: I'm all for that. I would like to see Albert Borla,
Speaker 2: a Pfizer, given the death penalty because he kills a
Speaker 2: lot more than five hundred people a year, a lot more.
Speaker 2: That big, beautiful vaccine would never happened without what I did.
Speaker 2: Look at this isn't that wonderful? Take it? Take my poison.
Speaker 2: It's like the wicked witch. Yeah, it's not pretty.
Speaker 1: Have you there?
Speaker 2: It's just that's Trump out there holding out the the
Speaker 2: wonderful apple, this miracle of science. It's a moonshot, I
Speaker 2: tell you. Yeah, it is very much like the moonshot,
Speaker 2: isn't it. So we want to talk about drug dealers.
Speaker 2: Don't want to talk about these drug dealers that he
Speaker 2: put in charge of HHS cartel leader actually kind of ceo. Yeah,
Speaker 2: when you work for l Chapo, the confiscate your assets.
Speaker 2: When you work for a Pfizer, they you know, just
Speaker 2: stuff your bank account with money. Yeah, it's it's amazing.
Speaker 2: Trump repeats an urban legend by invoking fentanyl laced marijuana
Speaker 2: as well. This is Reason Magazine Jacob Sullom and he says, okay, okay.
Speaker 2: So he does acknowledge the dangers created by prohibition, and
Speaker 2: he does use that as a starting point to say,
Speaker 2: I'm going to vote for the legalization of marijuana in Florida.
Speaker 2: Recreational use of marijuana he wants legalized, but don't smoke
Speaker 2: around him, not in public places. Will still be able
Speaker 2: to rash you with the police if you smoke in
Speaker 2: public places. But then he repeats this tired urban leigion,
Speaker 2: a fentanyl laced marijuana. It's always about fear. And yet
Speaker 2: the truth that he hits on is the fact that prohibition,
Speaker 2: besides corrupting the police, besides corrupting the courts, besides failing
Speaker 2: to do anything, prohibition, whether you're talking about alcohol, drugs, guns,
Speaker 2: you name it, whatever you want to prohibit, you create
Speaker 2: a monopoly for organized crime. You create corruption for all
Speaker 2: the law enforcement and justice system, because you know, it's
Speaker 2: very easy for them to look at this and say, well,
Speaker 2: these people wanted it. You know, this is a lot
Speaker 2: of people say a victimless crime, And I understand there's
Speaker 2: victims from addiction. Families, are victims people who were killed
Speaker 2: by somebody who's a drunk driver. For example, you know,
Speaker 2: drunkenness is not a victimless crime, but we had that
Speaker 2: experiment once and we actually did it in a way
Speaker 2: that respected the Constitution, and it failed, and we learned
Speaker 2: a lot from that, except we haven't applied those lessons
Speaker 2: to the failed war on drugs has now been going
Speaker 2: for fifty three years, a much bigger failure, and a
Speaker 2: failure that has created much more concentrated forms of recreational
Speaker 2: drugs than we ever had before and created much bigger
Speaker 2: drug cartels. I mean the cartels in Mexico that he
Speaker 2: wants to go to war with. They are actually getting
Speaker 2: military equipment and all the rest of stuff. Because it
Speaker 2: just is like al Capone on steroids, because that's exactly
Speaker 2: what it is. Al Capone would have had armored cars
Speaker 2: and tanks and going up and down the streets so Chicago,
Speaker 2: if they would have kept us going for fifty to
Speaker 2: sixty years, whoever succeeded him. Explaining his opposition to legal
Speaker 2: marijuana a couple of years ago, Marco Rubio warned that
Speaker 2: black market weed is laced with fentanyl. When Trump invoked
Speaker 2: fentonyl laced marijuana on Saturday, his logic made a lot
Speaker 2: more sense He cited that hazard as a reason to
Speaker 2: support Amendment three of Florida, a ballot initiative that would
Speaker 2: recognize recreational marijuana in that state. Both arguments suffered from
Speaker 2: the same flaw. Fentanyl laced marijuana is an imaginary threat,
Speaker 2: and we know that's the case. How do we know well?
Speaker 2: And reason they talk about the economics of it, because
Speaker 2: you know, they're all about economics. Illicit market weed sells
Speaker 2: her anywhere from five dollars to thirty dollars a gram.
Speaker 2: In most states, fentanyl is worth about forty dollars per
Speaker 2: twenty five microgram patch, the low end dosage for a
Speaker 2: cancer patient treating severe pain. A pure gram of fentanyl
Speaker 2: is worth up to two hundred dollars. So in a
Speaker 2: best case economic scenario, the drug dealer would be losing
Speaker 2: ten dollars on every sale. Worst case to be poisoning
Speaker 2: their loyal customers and wasting fentanel that they could sell
Speaker 2: for much more at a much lower volume. So it
Speaker 2: doesn't make any economic sense. But you think that rubio
Speaker 2: and trumping economic analysis. Frankly, I wouldn't have known what
Speaker 2: the economics of this stuff are either, But reason does
Speaker 2: They've got connections with people. This is actually the figures
Speaker 2: came from a writer for a publication called Leafley, which
Speaker 2: I imagine is about marijuana. So what Trump said is
Speaker 2: someone should not be a criminal in Florida for possessing
Speaker 2: marijuana when this is legal in so many other states.
Speaker 2: Is that the yardstick for this is that how we
Speaker 2: determine it. So it is legal in a lot of
Speaker 2: other states, and it shouldn't be illegal in Florida. Okay, Well,
Speaker 2: find is he going to apply that to abortion? Yeah?
Speaker 2: And when he talks about abortion, he doesn't want it
Speaker 2: as a federal issue. And I don't want it as
Speaker 2: a federal issue because it is constitutionally and pragmatically a
Speaker 2: big issue, a losing issue constitutionally and in terms of
Speaker 2: saving lives. That's a failing issue to make it a
Speaker 2: federal case. But when he talks about it, he doesn't
Speaker 2: talk about it that way. He doesn't care about saving lives,
Speaker 2: and he certainly doesn't care about the constitution saving it.
Speaker 2: And so Trump will always say, well, you know, well
Speaker 2: I have every state should be able to do their
Speaker 2: own thing. Well, now what he's saying is, well, if
Speaker 2: it's legal for marijuana and other states, then we need
Speaker 2: to make it legal here. And then he says, besides,
Speaker 2: these arrests are quote ruining lives and wasting taxpayer dollars.
Speaker 2: We could say that about the entire war on drugs,
Speaker 2: can't you. He said, no one should grieve a loved
Speaker 2: one because they died from fentonyl laced marijuana, and so
Speaker 2: that's you know, that got reason upset. So yeah, it
Speaker 2: doesn't make any economic sense. That is totally total nonsense.
Speaker 2: But of course the war on drugs doesn't make any
Speaker 2: sense if your purpose is to stop people from taking
Speaker 2: this stuff. See, the problem is though it's not a
Speaker 2: government issue. It's not a law enforcement issue. It is
Speaker 2: a spiritual issue. It is a medical issue, if you will,
Speaker 2: if you're a secularist, it's a psychological issue. But it's
Speaker 2: not a law enforcement issue. And we've got fifty three
Speaker 2: years to prove it, don't We doesn't matter how much
Speaker 2: they ramp this up. As a matter of fact, the
Speaker 2: FBI said, we just grabbed enough sentinel to kill two
Speaker 2: and a half million Americans, and we seized it in
Speaker 2: South Carolina. See, it's not just drug prohibition, it's not
Speaker 2: just alcohol provitions. All probision. Prohibition always creates more intense
Speaker 2: forms of what it is that you are trying to lemonade,
Speaker 2: as well as increasingly dangerous criminal cartels, and we need
Speaker 2: to start addressing. This is one other area in our
Speaker 2: society that is there because of a spiritual issue. People
Speaker 2: are addicted to so many different things, and of course
Speaker 2: these things are highly addictive, but the only real answer
Speaker 2: day this stuff is spiritual. You have to stop looking
Speaker 2: to these things to escape reality, to give meaning to
Speaker 2: your life. You've got to stop make centering your life
Speaker 2: around the next high. And that's what your relationship with
Speaker 2: Christ is going to give you. But you know, if
Speaker 2: you think that you're going to get that so you're
Speaker 2: going to stop somebody from destroying themselves. I have to
Speaker 2: ask what drug are you on? If you're looking at
Speaker 2: this stuff for fifty three years, you know you you've
Speaker 2: got about as much upstairs as Joe Biden does. If
Speaker 2: that's what you think. Rumble Tom mcdog, thank you for
Speaker 2: the tip. He says, you've helped make me a better man. Well,
Speaker 2: thank you. I'm sure that I don't get credit for that.
Speaker 2: The magnet helps tug my moral compass. Also give Travis
Speaker 2: a firm handshake for a job well done. Well, thank
Speaker 2: you for the compliment. I appreciate that it's going to
Speaker 2: be christ that makes you a better man. Trump has
Speaker 2: signal support for a proposal that will legalize recreational marijuana
Speaker 2: in Florida. So he says, I'm going to vote for it,
Speaker 2: going to vote for it. And I thought it was
Speaker 2: kind of interesting that as this is happening, we're talking
Speaker 2: about I was flip flopping back and forth. He's trying.
Speaker 2: He's trying on policy things like a new pseudo clothes,
Speaker 2: a new one every day, still has the same red tie,
Speaker 2: but he's trying on different policy issues every day to
Speaker 2: see which ones are going to fit in. Not very becoming,
Speaker 2: is it. And so some people on the left this
Speaker 2: all over Twitter, people putting up stuff. Somebody did a
Speaker 2: foyer request about what was happening with the medical unit
Speaker 2: in the White House. A White House medical unit, as
Speaker 2: many of them said, it's just turned into a pill mill.
Speaker 2: Here's an example of this. And you see these two
Speaker 2: columns that are redacted. Here they redacted the comments, and
Speaker 2: then they have who it was ordered by and who
Speaker 2: received it. That's all been redacted. Why is that Well,
Speaker 2: when you go down the list, if you can see this,
Speaker 2: do you see ambient, ambient, the fentanyl, all of this
Speaker 2: that over and over again. Some people said, well, for
Speaker 2: a clinic that doesn't do any procedures with moderate medication,
Speaker 2: they are ordering prodigious amounts of morphine, fentanyl, ketamine, all
Speaker 2: the rest of this stuff. So yeah, at the same
Speaker 2: time he wants to execute the drug dealers. Well, you know,
Speaker 2: if you want to execute the drug dealers, I suggest
Speaker 2: that you start with a CIA people like Gena Haspell,
Speaker 2: people who created crack cocaine epidemic, the people who ran
Speaker 2: Afghanistan and the war in Afghanistan, the people who took
Speaker 2: Afghanistan's production and the poppy fields from ten percent of
Speaker 2: the world's supply of opiates to ninety plus every year
Speaker 2: was a pumper crop. Rtie used to talk about that. Yeah,
Speaker 2: years and years ago before he got the memo. Roaldo
Speaker 2: Rivero talked about it. Showed the American troops guarding the
Speaker 2: poppy fields there and they admitted it, and then they
Speaker 2: stopped talking about it, but Russia would continue to talk
Speaker 2: about it. Russia will tell you what's wrong with America.
Speaker 2: They won't tell you what's wrong with Russia. And Americans
Speaker 2: won't tell you what's wrong there. They'll tell you what's
Speaker 2: wrong with Russia. But it's been going on a very
Speaker 2: long time. And if you want to come after the
Speaker 2: drug deal, President Trump, I suggest that you start with
Speaker 2: the CIA. Then you go to HHS and you arrest
Speaker 2: the FDA and the NIH and the NIAI d Fauci's organization.
Speaker 2: Those are the drug pushers. Those are the ones who
Speaker 2: are killing the most people. Those are the ones who
Speaker 2: killed more people than Fentanyel did. So start with them,
Speaker 2: start with the international traffickers of the CIA. Then go
Speaker 2: to your own drug pushers in your own administration. You
Speaker 2: put the CEO of ELI Lilly in after they gave
Speaker 2: you millions of dollars because you used RFK Junior. And
Speaker 2: he's doing the same thing again, folks, same thing he's
Speaker 2: using RFK Junior. Oh good, he's gonna finally he's gonna
Speaker 2: put RFK Junior in an RFK is going to do
Speaker 2: something about vaccines. It's like, I don't think if you
Speaker 2: put RFK junior in RFK Junior with doing it. I
Speaker 2: don't trust r f K Junior. I certainly don't trust Trump.
Speaker 2: More likely he's I'm gonna put him in there just
Speaker 2: to bid his price up with the pharmaceutical people. So
Speaker 2: you start with them, and then when you finish arresting
Speaker 2: and executing the people in the CIA for drug abuse
Speaker 2: and the rest of this stuff, drug trafficking, child trafficking, wars, coups, assassinations. Okay,
Speaker 2: then you can move on to HHS. Shut down those agencies,
Speaker 2: arrest those people, bet him in jail, fauci, and give
Speaker 2: him the death sentence, that's for sure. And then go
Speaker 2: to the White House doctors that were prescribing all the fentanylon,
Speaker 2: all the rest of these things for you and your
Speaker 2: crew there. Shut that thing down. Then you can talk
Speaker 2: about us. How about that. Yeah, get it out of
Speaker 2: your own eye first, in your own veins and your
Speaker 2: own stomach first. Trump proceed to call in the Florida
Speaker 2: State Legislature Republicans eighty three to thirty six Democrats in
Speaker 2: the House in twenty eight to twelve in the Senate. Republican,
Speaker 2: he said, responsibly create laws that prohibit the use of
Speaker 2: marijuana in public spaces so we don't smell it everywhere
Speaker 2: we go like we do in many of the Democrat
Speaker 2: run cities. Well, that's not the only thing you smell
Speaker 2: the Democrat run cities. You also smell the feces and
Speaker 2: everything else that is out there with a homeless everywhere.
Speaker 2: After a pro lifers, he cried Trump for stating that
Speaker 2: six weeks is too short when he was talking about abortion.
Speaker 2: His campaign quickly issued a statement saying he's not yet
Speaker 2: said how he will vote on the ballot initiative in Florida.
Speaker 2: He simply reiterated that he believes six weeks is too short. No,
Speaker 2: he did, he did. And just in case you missed it,
Speaker 2: all right, mind you that when it looked like there
Speaker 2: was going to be a primary and he was ramping
Speaker 2: up for it, he criticized DeSantis. He said, it's just
Speaker 2: too harsh, too harsh to save babies' lives. This is
Speaker 2: why he will never, never win on the issue of
Speaker 2: a boy. He didn't know how to handle it because
Speaker 2: he doesn't want to expose it, because he doesn't care.
Speaker 2: And anybody who doesn't care about killing babies will produce
Speaker 2: a vaccine that'll kill you at any age and every age,
Speaker 2: as well as babies. With that. Yeah, if we take
Speaker 2: a look at Trump's flip flops. He has Let's see,
Speaker 2: what do I have that in here? Didn't I put
Speaker 2: that in? I guess I don't have it. I forgot
Speaker 2: to put that in. So I had a clip where
Speaker 2: he flip flopped back and forth with a First, he
Speaker 2: told somebody in an interview that he was going to
Speaker 2: vote against he was going to vote for abortion in Florida,
Speaker 2: and then after he got a big pushback from people
Speaker 2: on that, then he said he was going to vote
Speaker 2: to support line, except that he'd said it was already
Speaker 2: too harsh. Again, he doesn't know you got La La Harris,
Speaker 2: as it was in the clip that I don't have
Speaker 2: hair is going to show you. She's going around the
Speaker 2: country and a van pushing abortion. That's her thing. Cult
Speaker 2: of death? Is it just amazing? And what is his
Speaker 2: response to it? He can't call it a cult of death.
Speaker 2: He can't talk about their hypocrisy of saying it's my body,
Speaker 2: my choice, and you say my body, my choice. But
Speaker 2: you'll like to be oh well, he did the same
Speaker 2: thing too, writ you lot people down, you put a
Speaker 2: mask on them, not your choice. Biden just came in
Speaker 2: as part of a tag team thing to extend the
Speaker 2: same principles that Trump had established during lockdown and mask
Speaker 2: stuff that he had paid for. He just extended that
Speaker 2: to the JAB logical extension. We knew that was going
Speaker 2: to be the case when they're telling everybody your mask
Speaker 2: doesn't protect you, it protects the other person. What it
Speaker 2: doesn't protect anybody. Neither do their vaccines. Both of them
Speaker 2: are hazard to your health. But the JAB, that's the
Speaker 2: worst thing. But they were preparing people psychologically for this.
Speaker 2: You know, you got to take the JAB. Doesn't help you,
Speaker 2: but it helps other people. So she's accused him of
Speaker 2: flip flopping on marijuana and ed. If you remember, Chelsey
Speaker 2: Gabbard nailed her in the twenty twenty campaign. In a debate,
Speaker 2: she accused Harris of putting over a quote fifteen hundred
Speaker 2: people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about
Speaker 2: it when she was asked that she if she'd ever
Speaker 2: smoked marijuana. None of that, But she made up a
Speaker 2: story about how she used to listen to such and
Speaker 2: such a group when she was in college and she
Speaker 2: would smoked pot. People said, well, that group wasn't even
Speaker 2: round when you were in college, So I don't know
Speaker 2: what she was smoking, As the saying goes, I don't
Speaker 2: know what you're smoking today. I don't know what Joe
Speaker 2: Biden is smoking today as well. But then what Trump?
Speaker 2: In twenty nineteen, Trump helped pay for an ad campaign
Speaker 2: warning about marijuana's drug side effects, but now he's all
Speaker 2: for it. His Surgeon General Jerome Adams and his HHS
Speaker 2: secretary Alex as are the CEO of ELI Lilly also
Speaker 2: advised against marijuana legalization, and they didn't even mention in
Speaker 2: this Life site news article here Jeff Sessions, who was
Speaker 2: obsessive about it, and what did all of this show us?
Speaker 2: Especially Jeff Sessions, folks, showed us that the solution to
Speaker 2: our problems, it's not going to be found in the
Speaker 2: Oval office. It's not going to be found in a
Speaker 2: Republican or a Democrat as president. The solution to our problems,
Speaker 2: most of our problems are coming from the federal government.
Speaker 2: The drug war is coming from the federal government. And
Speaker 2: so the solution to that is to nullify it at
Speaker 2: the state level. And from a just a purely constitutional
Speaker 2: legal standpoint, again, I'm absolutely opposed to ambition. I don't
Speaker 2: make a god out of government, and if you think
Speaker 2: that government is going to be somebody's solution to this stuff,
Speaker 2: then you are making a god out of government. You
Speaker 2: need to check yourself on that. What you're saying is, well,
Speaker 2: God can't save me, but the swat team can't. Seriously,
Speaker 2: how stupid is that you think swat Team's going to
Speaker 2: save you but God can't. Right, Okay, we know how
Speaker 2: that's worked out. The bottom line is nullification is the
Speaker 2: big story to come out of all this marijuana stuff.
Speaker 2: I don't recommend anybody use it, but I also know
Speaker 2: that even though that has been the number one charge
Speaker 2: against people in the War on drugs, more people locked
Speaker 2: up for medical marijuana possession or not medical but marijuana possession,
Speaker 2: marijuana use, distributional more people for marijuana than anything else,
Speaker 2: and then all the rest of them combined. And yet
Speaker 2: they nullified it at the state level, nullified it in
Speaker 2: a number of ways. As a matter of fact, you
Speaker 2: have medical marijuana is legal in thirty eight states. Thirty
Speaker 2: eight states have nullified them. And they made medical marijuana
Speaker 2: legal while marijuana was scheduled as classified as a Schedule
Speaker 2: one drug, which means that is highly addictive, highly dangerous,
Speaker 2: and has no medical use, and they said, no, we're
Speaker 2: going to make it legal and use it for medicine.
Speaker 2: Thirty eight states did that, and so you've also got
Speaker 2: nineteen states that have made recreational marijuana use, plus the
Speaker 2: District of Columbia allow recreational use of marijuana. So nineteen
Speaker 2: states in DC said you can use it however you want,
Speaker 2: even though it's a Schedule one drug, and you got
Speaker 2: thirty eight states. I said, many have said we're going
Speaker 2: to allow it for medical use. And there are some
Speaker 2: medical uses for it, uncontrolled convulsions, which in many cases
Speaker 2: is a reaction, an adverse reaction to vaccines. And David
Speaker 2: Simpson was an excellent Texas legislator, state legislator when I
Speaker 2: was in Texas about a decade ago. He was there
Speaker 2: for a few terms and then he ran for Senate.
Speaker 2: He didn't win for Senate and he stopped. But he
Speaker 2: was a man of impeccable integrity and character, and he
Speaker 2: was conservative. He's a conservative Christian, and he said, I
Speaker 2: can't allow these parents who have kids who are damaged.
Speaker 2: They can't control their seizures. No medication helps him. The
Speaker 2: only thing that helps him is marijuana. They're getting it in Colorado,
Speaker 2: but they're running the risk if they bring that back
Speaker 2: to Texas of going to and so he got an
Speaker 2: exception in Texas. And Texas doesn't recognize medical marijuana at all,
Speaker 2: but they made one exception for that one particular thing
Speaker 2: because of David Simpson. One individual can make a difference
Speaker 2: and we can stop this, and we can nullify this
Speaker 2: even in a drug war crazy state like Texas. Especially
Speaker 2: when you look at Austin, it's like, it's amazing to me,
Speaker 2: the entire city of Austin isn't under arrest. But so
Speaker 2: even though it's a Schedule one drug, thirty eight states,
Speaker 2: seventy six percent of the states have made it legal.
Speaker 2: We can do that with any issue. And states have
Speaker 2: done that with a second Amendment as well. They have
Speaker 2: nullified federal things. Just in Tennessee, for example, Center nicely
Speaker 2: that well, we got that covered when Biden wanted to
Speaker 2: do the pistol brace thing. We have passed two laws.
Speaker 2: One of them says pistol brass are legal. The other
Speaker 2: one says if the federal government tries to enforce some
Speaker 2: prohibition on something that we've declared legal in Tennessee, you
Speaker 2: can't do it. That type of thing, and we're going
Speaker 2: to block that. We're not going to allow Tennessee officers
Speaker 2: to participate in that. We're going to block them from
Speaker 2: acting in our state. You can nullify, and that's what
Speaker 2: we should take away from all this war on drugs stuff.
Speaker 2: And then finally, Schedule one. The USDA April of this
Speaker 2: year announced that it was easing restrictions on marijuana by
Speaker 2: reclassifying the drug from Schedule one to Schedule three. Now
Speaker 2: we've had both Democrats and Republicans talking about this, so
Speaker 2: this makes no sense. Look at all the states that have,
Speaker 2: you know, authorize this for medical use, and we're still
Speaker 2: saying it has no medical use. And so they move
Speaker 2: it from Schedule one to Schedule three. There's four schedules
Speaker 2: that are there, right, So that's a big demotion in marijuana.
Speaker 2: But still you still have thirty eight percent of the
Speaker 2: states to say we don't care. People can get it anyway.
Speaker 2: So they still have nullified this law and they can
Speaker 2: do that, and Jeff Sessions couldn't do anything about it
Speaker 2: because they never passed the constitutional amendment like they did
Speaker 2: with alcohol. So the federal government has no authority. What
Speaker 2: they do they bribe they blackmail, They encourage sheriff's offices
Speaker 2: and police departments to steal property from people, and then
Speaker 2: they split the loot with them. It's criminal what the
Speaker 2: federal government is doing. They ignore the law, They pay
Speaker 2: no attention to the constitution. They entice local law enforcement
Speaker 2: to violate the constitution. They we'll share the loot where
Speaker 2: they just steal from people, don't even charge them with
Speaker 2: a crime. You don't have to find them guilty. You
Speaker 2: just confiscate whatever you want, call it a drug bust,
Speaker 2: and we'll split the loot with you. How about that?
Speaker 2: That was a Trump administration. That was Jeff Session's only
Speaker 2: thing that he could do because he knew that if
Speaker 2: he took it to court. Just like when the IRS
Speaker 2: tries to intimidate churches and say you can't talk about
Speaker 2: politics in your church. You had a lot of different
Speaker 2: several different pastors vers it was just three of them
Speaker 2: one year challenge the IRS on that that's a violation
Speaker 2: of our First Amendments. So they recorded their sermon, they
Speaker 2: talked directly about politics to make the point, sent the
Speaker 2: tape to the IRS. The IRS never did anything. The
Speaker 2: next year is like a dozen and then it was
Speaker 2: the next year after that, like three dozen, they never
Speaker 2: would do anything because, just like Jeff Sessions, they know
Speaker 2: they don't have a leg to stand on legally. We
Speaker 2: need to nullify these unconstitutional things that the federal government
Speaker 2: is doing, and we need to not be bribed by
Speaker 2: their money. That's how you stop the federal government. It's
Speaker 2: not by electing Trump or La LA or whatever. That's
Speaker 2: not going to do anything. You have to stop them
Speaker 2: with nullification at the local level. And so finally, where
Speaker 2: did that schedule even come from? It didn't come from
Speaker 2: Richard Nixon. It came from the UN. It was a
Speaker 2: UN that created the four tier schedule for drugs. It
Speaker 2: was a UN that decided that marijuana was going to
Speaker 2: be in number one and so forth, and all put
Speaker 2: all the different drugs in these four different categories. That
Speaker 2: all came from the UN. You know when I figured
Speaker 2: that out, I didn't know that for forty plus years,
Speaker 2: even though I was pushing back against the illegal war
Speaker 2: on drugs, I learned that when you had one of
Speaker 2: the first Democrat run states nullified this unconstitutional. There was
Speaker 2: never an amendment for drug war, so they nullified it
Speaker 2: for marijuana. And when they did that the un started
Speaker 2: squealing about it. They can't do that. I got a
Speaker 2: schedule here and all the rest of the stuff. So
Speaker 2: I started looking this out. I was like, what's their
Speaker 2: dog in this fight? And then I realized that they
Speaker 2: were the ones who had passed that schedule in the
Speaker 2: first place. That Richard Nixon was just a little globalist puppet,
Speaker 2: wasn't even his idea. All these years, I've been blaming
Speaker 2: tricky Dicky for this thing, and yeah, he has to
Speaker 2: blame for it, and he is tricky and he is despicable.
Speaker 2: But uh, he didn't do that. I mean, he enacted that.
Speaker 2: It was not his idea. He doesn't get he didn't
Speaker 2: have a good idea for it. He just ran that
Speaker 2: thing through. So Trump is calling out the FDA employee
Speaker 2: to a big pharma lobbyist pipeline. He says, anybody who
Speaker 2: goes to the government should be banned from ever being
Speaker 2: a lobbyist. Said this in an interview here.
Speaker 6: So here's a bigger problem in our country. Would you
Speaker 6: say opioids? Well, bigger than alcohol?
Speaker 7: Oh for sure. I think it's that's one of the
Speaker 7: biggest problems. And you compare that to a oh yeah, well,
Speaker 7: that's the problem is people are making fake opioids because
Speaker 7: they can't afford real wins that they're just getting him
Speaker 7: off the street and then they put fentonel in them.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's hard to how they shut down in Afghanistan now,
Speaker 2: it's horrible.
Speaker 7: It's horrible. Yeah, they found someone in a baby rattle somewhere.
Speaker 7: I think I don't even know where that was. But
Speaker 7: one of the things I was wanted to ask you
Speaker 7: about was like, so there's like the big former lobbyists,
Speaker 7: Like there's eighteen hundred big farmer lobbyists in Washington, d C.
Speaker 7: There's only five hundred and thirty five total representatives or
Speaker 7: senators total. So just the fact that there's this whole
Speaker 7: other almost drug government that's there kind of pushing the
Speaker 7: you know, pushing agendas and influencing things like how do
Speaker 7: we stop them? And it just seems like it's obviously
Speaker 7: killing people, like people are dying. You know, it's like,
Speaker 7: what do we have to do that our own government
Speaker 7: won't help us?
Speaker 6: Well, you have to stop listening to lobous. You know,
Speaker 6: I was not a big person for lobbyists. And have
Speaker 6: you even a little access to like a president or
Speaker 6: a senator or a congressman or.
Speaker 2: Woman or snake. You get a lot of money.
Speaker 6: Yeah, and in some cases they just take the money,
Speaker 6: they don't do anything. But you have a lot of
Speaker 6: lobbyists in Washington pushing and certainly a lot for the
Speaker 6: all of the things that we're talking about winding alcohol.
Speaker 7: The lobbyists are winning it for you, the one they're
Speaker 7: making a lot of money. Can you stop that? Can
Speaker 7: can a president stop that?
Speaker 1: Like?
Speaker 7: How do we stop that?
Speaker 6: Well, one way you could stop it is to say,
Speaker 6: if you're going to go into government, you can never
Speaker 6: be a lobbyist. In many cases they have rules and
Speaker 6: regulations where you can't do it for four years, three years,
Speaker 6: five years, whatever you.
Speaker 7: Mean, be a lobbyist after you were an elected official.
Speaker 6: I mean you could you're saying you could say that
Speaker 6: if you're an elected official, or if you work in government,
Speaker 6: you can never be a lobbyist. You have people that
Speaker 6: work in government and they give out contracts to the
Speaker 6: military and then they leave and they work for them
Speaker 6: for the people that they're giving out contract.
Speaker 7: That's exactly what happened with the Sackler family with the
Speaker 7: drug companies. They hired people that were on the FDA
Speaker 7: to work for them so they could loophole the laws. Yeah,
Speaker 7: you know, but driving the outlaw lobbyists or we can't
Speaker 7: do that.
Speaker 5: Wow, it's amazing the whole constitutional thing there can you
Speaker 5: make somebody never ever go into the business if you're
Speaker 5: if you work for government, and especially if you're giving
Speaker 5: out contracts.
Speaker 6: In other words, you're a powerful person within some industry,
Speaker 6: the Navy, the army, any you know anything. It could
Speaker 6: be military procurement, et cetera. There's a whole thing, like
Speaker 6: the old question is to you give out a contract
Speaker 6: and then all of a sudden you're working for the
Speaker 6: person you gave out the contractor or the company that
Speaker 6: you gave out the contract to.
Speaker 7: Right, it's like you're playing both sides in the net.
Speaker 6: Well, it's and it's obviously a problem, and it's a
Speaker 6: big problem, and we were doing things about it, but
Speaker 6: then we had to get down to other business we
Speaker 6: had to solve.
Speaker 2: Is this kind of that's interviewing him? Is he really
Speaker 2: that stupid? Is he really that stupid? Do you not
Speaker 2: know anything about what happened with the vaccine industry? For example?
Speaker 2: And you got both of Trump's FDA directors the FDA
Speaker 2: directors Scott gottlieb And and Hahn, both of them go to
Speaker 2: work for Pfiser Moderna. You want to talk about a
Speaker 2: revolving door. Where did the guy that was head of
Speaker 2: HHS come from? Hek who's the CEO of Eli Lily,
Speaker 2: one of the biggest drug companies out there. You want
Speaker 2: to talk about hypocrisy, Yeah, we don't need lobbyists. Let's
Speaker 2: get the CEO directly in. We'll put the CEO in
Speaker 2: charge of HHS. Just give Trump a few million dollars
Speaker 2: turn the transition period and you're good. And you had
Speaker 2: Alex Zar, CEO of Eli Lily there for all four years.
Speaker 2: He ran all this stuff. He was the first one
Speaker 2: the end of January to declare that there was a
Speaker 2: pandemic emergency and all the rest of this stuff. And
Speaker 2: then the people of the FDA who just look the
Speaker 2: other way, green lit and rubber stamped all of this
Speaker 2: stuff with the vaccines. They go to work for Pfizer
Speaker 2: and Moderna. What hypocrisy. Unbelievably, you got to stop listening
Speaker 2: to lobbyist. I was not a big person for lobbyists,
Speaker 2: said Trump. Yeah, the lobbyist don't have near as much
Speaker 2: money as the CEO's for them. That's where the real
Speaker 2: money is. He talks about the thousands of lobbyists, and
Speaker 2: that's just one industry. Right, take a look at the
Speaker 2: military industrial complex. I briefly mentioned that, what about Israel?
Speaker 2: What about the lobbyists for foreign governments coming in? You see,
Speaker 2: that's why Lala Harris is able to get five hundred
Speaker 2: million dollars in one month, why she's now got over
Speaker 2: a billion dollars because she also brought in money that
Speaker 2: had been an evinced auction of stolen goods. That's what
Speaker 2: election is, right, So I got that money that had
Speaker 2: been collected by Biden in so's she's flushed, and so
Speaker 2: it is trump unbelievable hypocrisy. I guess you know, we
Speaker 2: could even call Fauci a lobbyist. I mean he was
Speaker 2: lobbying for Rim dezevir Ron death is near. Yeah, isn't
Speaker 2: that amazing? Time for the never Trump Republicans to put
Speaker 2: on their big boy pants to think of their country?
Speaker 2: Says this article from some guy Brian June depf at
Speaker 2: American Thinker. Well, Brian, you may have your big boy
Speaker 2: pants on, but maybe you need your diaper change. You're
Speaker 2: just peeing your pants thinking that Trump may not get elected.
Speaker 2: I said before, you need to change your diapers frequently,
Speaker 2: just like politicians, because they're both full of the same stuff.
Speaker 2: Unbelievably stupid arguments made by this person here. You don't
Speaker 2: know or care what these people are saying. You don't
Speaker 2: know or care what they did. Nothing says one's Republican
Speaker 2: like voting for a liberal Democrat. He said, well, I
Speaker 2: guess that's why he supports Trump, because that's what Trump is.
Speaker 2: Trump is a New York Democrat. He is no different
Speaker 2: from Hillary, except that he ran an opposition to her.
Speaker 2: So he's got to adopt the uniform and the purported
Speaker 2: policies of the other side. But he partied with the
Speaker 2: them all the time. Look, the solution, folks, is not
Speaker 2: in the presidential election. The solution is to nullify DC.
Speaker 2: We have to have AC. I think we have to
Speaker 2: have an alternative Colombia instead of a District of Columbia.
Speaker 2: I think we need to go from DC to AC
Speaker 2: an alternate system, and that alternate system is a system
Speaker 2: of federalization, of non centralization. It's about not looking to
Speaker 2: have an emperor fix everything in your life for some
Speaker 2: billionaire who's going to be altruistic or whatever. There is
Speaker 2: one good thing that came from Trump's tenure there, and
Speaker 2: that is distrust in vaccine. That's one thing that he's
Speaker 2: left behind. Inadvertently. He doesn't understand why. I mean, he
Speaker 2: keeps telling everybody how wonderful they are. Nobody trusts the vaccines,
Speaker 2: but they all trust Trump, don't they on the conservative side.
Speaker 2: On the liberal side, it's just the opposite. Washington Post
Speaker 2: had an article talking about Trump is all over the
Speaker 2: place on vaccines, and they criticized him for the times
Speaker 2: that he would talk against vaccines, but then they gave
Speaker 2: him credit for all the misery that he created with
Speaker 2: the vaccines. But for the Conservatives, just the opposite of
Speaker 2: the Washington Posts. They see it flip flopping all the time,
Speaker 2: but then they just excuse it and fall in line.
Speaker 2: If only distrust for politicians would grow like the distrust
Speaker 2: and vaccines, but of course it doesn't because they have
Speaker 2: these two parties. They have this Tagelian dialectic, and it
Speaker 2: works perfectly every election. It works perfectly, flawless in its execution,
Speaker 2: and these people never catch on. Study finds a nine
Speaker 2: point six percent fatality rate among people who reported myocarditis
Speaker 2: or paara carditis after an MRI MR and a COVID vaccine.
Speaker 2: So you know, we want to talk about fentanyl though, right, fentanyl,
Speaker 2: and we want to talk about opioids.
Speaker 7: Right.
Speaker 2: That guy there, does he not know he mentioned the
Speaker 2: Sackler family. Does he know who made the drugs for
Speaker 2: the Sackler family. I don't even know who that guy is.
Speaker 2: I've seen him, you know this interview they had with Trump.
Speaker 2: So he scores an interview with Trump because he's low
Speaker 2: information sycophant. But he doesn't know anything about where the
Speaker 2: Sackler family got there opioids. You know where they got
Speaker 2: him from, Johnson and Johnson. Johnson and Johnson was selling
Speaker 2: them and themselves directly the people, and the Sackler family
Speaker 2: was the one who did bang up job of marketing
Speaker 2: through hospitals and doctors to get people who come in
Speaker 2: not looking for a high, they come in in severe
Speaker 2: pain and they tell the doctors give them this stuff
Speaker 2: and get them addicted and destroy their lives. I remember
Speaker 2: when Chris Christie was running for Present in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 2: a hardcore drug warrior, and he told the sad story
Speaker 2: of a friend of his that he went through college
Speaker 2: with uh legal legal school, and the guy got out
Speaker 2: he became a very successful lawyer, very wealthy. He was jogging,
Speaker 2: you know, I guess Chris Christie has a lot of
Speaker 2: respect for that. Maybe I don't know, but uh, he
Speaker 2: was athletic and he hurt his back severely, and they
Speaker 2: got him addicted to opioids, and that addiction caused him
Speaker 2: to lose his practice. It caused him eventually to lose
Speaker 2: his family, and then eventually he took He took his
Speaker 2: own life in suicide. Chris Christie said, that's why we
Speaker 2: can't make marijuana legal. It's like, what, how was that
Speaker 2: sequitur to that? That's a non sequitor to marijuana. This
Speaker 2: is somebody who was not looking even to get high.
Speaker 2: He had this imposed on him by the criminal medical
Speaker 2: system in the hospitals. He didn't know what was happening,
Speaker 2: and they got him addicted to this pain killer. And
Speaker 2: so it's a very different situation. But let me just
Speaker 2: ask you. You know, they like to talk about fentanyl
Speaker 2: all the time, and they don't like to talk about
Speaker 2: the real mass murder drug, the mr and a vaccine
Speaker 2: which Trump and Biden and the Republicans and the Democrats
Speaker 2: all had a hand in. And so let me ask you,
Speaker 2: did you ever have or hear of any employers requiring
Speaker 2: that you take fentanyl in order to get a job
Speaker 2: that ever happened. Did they push fentanyl on did the
Speaker 2: government push fentanyl on kids? Well, I'm outside of the
Speaker 2: CIA and stuff. Ok No, why is it that we
Speaker 2: ignore all these people that are dying from para carditis
Speaker 2: and myocardiis. It's rare. You're going to be fine. To
Speaker 2: forget about it. Okay, just forget about it. Take another one,
Speaker 2: take another booster, right. You know they're telling people kids
Speaker 2: now with myocarditis in peragrid it's okay. We said from
Speaker 2: the very beginning, cardiologists said, you damage your heart never
Speaker 2: comes back. I know that everybody knows that it's one.
Speaker 2: Do you think I don't know that that's smart and short,
Speaker 2: But yeah, they just dismiss it. There's no problem. And
Speaker 2: yet ten percent of the people already are dying after
Speaker 2: they have been identified with my rocarditis and pericarditis. That
Speaker 2: maybe even higher than that, maybe they haven't been identified.
Speaker 2: We have a lot of people all the time. You're
Speaker 2: seeing people public figures who are dropping dead. Just saw
Speaker 2: this with a wrapper up on stage and he's talking
Speaker 2: and you know, and just boom, just like that, drops
Speaker 2: over dead right in the middle of talking on stage.
Speaker 2: Wasn't dancing. It might have been dancing or whatever, but
Speaker 2: that's what typically happens people who don't know that they
Speaker 2: have a heart that's been damaged by the mRNA Sudden
Speaker 2: adult death syndrome. Fatality rates were highest among men under thirty.
Speaker 2: Isn't that interesting? That is the most hated demographic of
Speaker 2: the globalists and the Marxist isn't it men under the
Speaker 2: age of thirty. Trump's mixed record on vaccines as in
Speaker 2: the Spotlight, says Washington Post after the RFK Junior endorsement.
Speaker 2: And like I said before, Washington Post is just the
Speaker 2: mere opposite of maga. Both of them see Trump's all
Speaker 2: over the place. One of them, the MAGA people want
Speaker 2: to excuse it. You know, they believe that the vaccine
Speaker 2: is bad and Trump is good. Washington Post thinks that
Speaker 2: Trump is bad and the vaccine is good, and so
Speaker 2: Washington Post says, Trump vows to defund schools of vaccine mandates,
Speaker 2: but as president, he also embraced vaccines, championing the development
Speaker 2: of the coronavirus vaccine. Well, we didn't know that, did we.
Speaker 2: This is why I want to look at I talked about,
Speaker 2: you know, the people that are influencers that are pushing
Speaker 2: this stuff, and you know that are actually giving money
Speaker 2: to the Democrats, are actually taking money from them or whatever.
Speaker 2: Talked about that last week. One of the people I
Speaker 2: mentioned there was an article from Mile. How about Nick
Speaker 2: Fuent's person said, you just read that article. It's from Mile.
Speaker 2: It's like, so what he's there. He knows what's going
Speaker 2: on in the inner circle. He was part of that
Speaker 2: inner circle. And even if you don't pay attention to that,
Speaker 2: the personal stuff that's there, you know, was Fwinte's going
Speaker 2: to sell the list of all that he was trying
Speaker 2: to get money from the people that he said he
Speaker 2: was opposed to people that were Zionus. He says, oh,
Speaker 2: I'm all against Zionism. Okay, Well, now Fwine's two issues,
Speaker 2: according to him are the border and war. Well that's fine,
Speaker 2: those are two big issues, but why only two? You
Speaker 2: don't care about what you're going to pose Trump because
Speaker 2: of border, because the wall, of the war, because you
Speaker 2: want to get him moving in that direction. But you're
Speaker 2: not going to oppose him on the lockdown, on the
Speaker 2: poisonous jab and on the rest of the stuff, which
Speaker 2: he won't acknowledge is even an issue. And of course
Speaker 2: he doesn't acknowledge that he didn't do anything about the border.
Speaker 2: According to him, he fixed the border, and then on
Speaker 2: day one you had Biden break the border. No, he'd
Speaker 2: never closed the border. He did show that if there
Speaker 2: was a will to enforce the law, they could reduce
Speaker 2: the traffic, because they did that with the excuse that
Speaker 2: they had to do it for the so called pandemic.
Speaker 2: I had to keep up appearances there. But then you know,
Speaker 2: once the people came in, you could ship them around
Speaker 2: however you wish. But you know, Trump has championed the
Speaker 2: development of the coronavirus vaccine that allows public life to
Speaker 2: resume amid a pandemic, says Washington Post. And meanwhile, you
Speaker 2: got people in the mainstream alternative media tying their tongues
Speaker 2: in knot trying to excuse what Trump said and what
Speaker 2: Trump did in twenty twenty. It's just sugar water, right,
Speaker 2: Come on, you can take this for Trump. It's just
Speaker 2: sugar it's not the bad vaccine. It's just got adjuvants
Speaker 2: that I've been telling you're going to give you artism
Speaker 2: for twenty years. You can take that. Do it for Trump. Well,
Speaker 2: you know they always fall back when Trump vows to
Speaker 2: defund schools who have vaccine mandates, and the servitis are
Speaker 2: going to say, well, that's it. It's because Biden tried
Speaker 2: to mandate it. Well, okay, I'm against force and fraud.
Speaker 2: You said the fraud came with Trump, the force came
Speaker 2: with Biden. You should be a for You should be
Speaker 2: opposed to using force or fraud to achieve social or
Speaker 2: political goals. That was the core thing that somebody joined
Speaker 2: the Libertarian Party that used to be part of the
Speaker 2: things like I sign on down here, I agree that
Speaker 2: I'm not going to use force or fraud to achieve
Speaker 2: social or political goals. Well, they used force and fraud
Speaker 2: to achieve their political goals of depopulation twenty thirty and
Speaker 2: all the rest of this stuff lay in the foundation
Speaker 2: for universal basic income. That was all at the feet
Speaker 2: of Trump. He was the fraud who prepared the way
Speaker 2: for the force of Biden. Tell me that it makes
Speaker 2: a difference between these two. Okay, you put your big
Speaker 2: boy pants on their American thinker and tell me what
Speaker 2: I need to do about this stuff. Come on, big
Speaker 2: boy pants. They talk like children. Trump has also been
Speaker 2: a longtime vaccine skeptics, says Washington Post, who once falsely
Speaker 2: linked childhood vaccines to autism, and as he campaigns for
Speaker 2: another presidency, he's threatening to withhold money from schools of
Speaker 2: vaccine man dates. Of course, that was empty talk. That
Speaker 2: was a bidding war. He was bidding for people's votes,
Speaker 2: and he was bidding for money from the vaccine people.
Speaker 2: That's why he brought RFK Junior to Trump Tower. His
Speaker 2: appointment this week of RFK Junior, founder of a prominent
Speaker 2: anti vaccine group, an honorary co chair of his transition
Speaker 2: team for a possible second turnle Now he's going to
Speaker 2: make them co chair. He used them such advantage in
Speaker 2: his first transition team, got millions and millions of dollars,
Speaker 2: and then he, you know, filled up his HHS with
Speaker 2: executives from big pharmaceutical companies. I wonder what will happened
Speaker 2: the next time. They're going to say, then they talked
Speaker 2: to a vaccine proponent. Washington Post. Any role of an
Speaker 2: anti vaccine seller. Hear that, an anti vaccine seller. That's
Speaker 2: an odd way to put it. These people are all mongers.
Speaker 2: They're selling their warmongers selling war. They're poison mongers, selling
Speaker 2: their poisonous pharmachea garbage. You know, it's just it's amazing.
Speaker 2: It's not just the mark of the beast that is
Speaker 2: so amazing when you look at two thousand years ago,
Speaker 2: it's also identifying the pharma Kiah, the great and powerful
Speaker 2: men of the world who would not repent of their murders.
Speaker 2: I can't say it any more succinctly than John said
Speaker 2: it two thousand years ago. The role of an anti
Speaker 2: vaccine seller and a presidential administration would be a very
Speaker 2: bad thing for American society, said this guy, and he
Speaker 2: looks at the rising rate of measles. Yeah, oh yeah,
Speaker 2: fearful thing, isn't it. Again. They take one of their strategies,
Speaker 2: as we talked about, you have a situation where you've
Speaker 2: got measles or chicken pox or polio or you name it.
Speaker 2: You always got that bell shaped curve, right, the koi,
Speaker 2: the kuy that we had, the flatten. You know, Well,
Speaker 2: what happens is they come in after the you know
Speaker 2: you've done your little bell shape thing and you're on
Speaker 2: the tail end where it's tapering down, approaching zero, and
Speaker 2: they come in with their shots and say, look, we
Speaker 2: got rid of it with our shots, and time and
Speaker 2: time again, and they repeat that same playbook. And a
Speaker 2: July phone call with Kennedy, whom Trump has considered to
Speaker 2: lead as Vaccine Safety Commissioner, they go all about this.
Speaker 2: You know how you could hear on the phone Trump
Speaker 2: is pumping him up about how many shots they give.
Speaker 2: He says, you know, it's something like thirty eight different vaccines. No, no,
Speaker 2: it's ninety. I think it's ninety two. It's actually a
Speaker 2: very good graphic. It shows a baby land there and
Speaker 2: diapers and it's got all of the hypodermic needles that
Speaker 2: baby gets its first year of life and compares it
Speaker 2: to what they had in nineteen eighty four and nineteen
Speaker 2: eighty four, I think it was five in their first
Speaker 2: year of life, and now it's something like ninety two
Speaker 2: or ninety eight in their first year life. And they
Speaker 2: have them grouped because they're giving them like four or
Speaker 2: five shots of one thing over that first year, and
Speaker 2: they wonder why we got an explosion of autism, but
Speaker 2: not the Washington Post. Washington Post doesn't care, doesn't care
Speaker 2: to ask any questions about what's happening with autism. Why
Speaker 2: would people be skeptical of this stuff. So we got
Speaker 2: to say that, see there was something good that came
Speaker 2: out of the Trump administration, some vaccine hesitancy. People don't
Speaker 2: trust vaccines, even if they still trust Trump. And then
Speaker 2: when you look at what is happening in Gaza, mass
Speaker 2: polio vaccination to begin in Gaza after the deadly disease
Speaker 2: re emerges. So the Washington Post again, the Washington Post,
Speaker 2: there's a couple of things that are happening here. Number One,
Speaker 2: Polio has been their big success story, and it is
Speaker 2: a story, it's not true, but it's been their big
Speaker 2: pr campaign, just like the nineteen eighteen flu. That's the
Speaker 2: thing they want to scare everybody about all the time
Speaker 2: with the flu shots. Well, polio is their big success story.
Speaker 2: They think they tell you about the vaccine and it's not.
Speaker 2: And so part of this is the reemergence trying to
Speaker 2: build back the vaccine completely destroy the credibility of vaccines.
Speaker 2: They've destroyed the credibility of the existence of viruses. You
Speaker 2: can't isolate it, you can't identify it, and don't talk
Speaker 2: to me about science. If you've got a computer program
Speaker 2: that's generating randomly these genetic sequences and then you've got
Speaker 2: to send this out and say this is what we're
Speaker 2: looking for. Then you use a PCR test to find
Speaker 2: that genetic sequence and magnify it by a trillion times.
Speaker 2: What a joke, What a joke, junk science, just like
Speaker 2: the climate alarmism. So why call them both mcguffins. But yeah,
Speaker 2: they want to re merge, not a disease re emerging,
Speaker 2: but it's a concern they have that is reemerged, and
Speaker 2: that is hesitancy to get shots. And so that's a
Speaker 2: big part of it. The other part of it is
Speaker 2: that it is a sophisticated attack on the people in Gaza.
Speaker 2: Another one, yet another one, and always go after the
Speaker 2: children first. Remember when you want to attack a population,
Speaker 2: you go after the children. The WHO has been warning
Speaker 2: about a spread of polio after polio was detected in
Speaker 2: July and six sewerage samples in Gaza's southern and central
Speaker 2: regions by the WHO. So they use PCR to look
Speaker 2: for it in the sewer. Now what have they been doing.
Speaker 2: They've been injecting people with the very stuff that they're
Speaker 2: looking for in the sewer, and then they claim that
Speaker 2: now it is somehow an epidemic. And again you're back
Speaker 2: to the same game of this pc our magnification. Health
Speaker 2: authorities have worn for months that we're going to have
Speaker 2: worse thing conditions, and here they are. So it's a
Speaker 2: way for them to try to carve back some respect
Speaker 2: for these totally discredited vaccines, and it's a way for
Speaker 2: them to come after the people of Gaza as well,
Speaker 2: the children of Gaza. We'll be right back. You're listening
Speaker 2: to the David Night Show with the Great Replacement going along,
Speaker 2: progressing extremely quickly all across the West. Before we get
Speaker 2: into it, though, I just want to say real quickly
Speaker 2: thank you to those who sent checks the last week
Speaker 2: of August. Mary N. Brent and Ingrid S, Martin T.
Speaker 2: Scott and Samantha T. Jack H, William G Lois L.
Speaker 2: Aaron F. Will R. Eric M. Thank you all of you,
Speaker 2: and again zel the checks cash app and subscribe to
Speaker 2: all of those. That's how the program is funded and
Speaker 2: so we do appreciate your support. You are our producers.
Speaker 2: We could not do it without you. You're the ones
Speaker 2: who actually produced the show. Let's talk a little bit
Speaker 2: about what is going on with with the borders, with
Speaker 2: the replacement and along those lines, because you know, I
Speaker 2: see this as a massive welfare program. You know, the
Speaker 2: issue is not that we don't have a wall. The
Speaker 2: problem is that we've got a big magnet that's pulling
Speaker 2: people across, and that magnet's going to pull them under
Speaker 2: the wall, through the wall, over the wall, around the wall,
Speaker 2: you name it. If you put a big enough magnet
Speaker 2: out there, you're going to get people from all over
Speaker 2: the world coming here to get free stuff. And they
Speaker 2: just can't stop thinking about what the next free program
Speaker 2: is they're going to offer to people who are not citizens.
Speaker 2: Come to America, get whatever you want. Well, this is
Speaker 2: sent by Mary ellen Moore and she said she called
Speaker 2: it Brides of the State. She said, this is sent
Speaker 2: to me by friend David Samuels put this in a
Speaker 2: publication unheard, and he says the key to a Harris
Speaker 2: win in November won't be the support of black Americans,
Speaker 2: or Indi Indian Americans, or even brown Americans. Though she
Speaker 2: has identified at various points in her political life all
Speaker 2: three of these. Rather, Harris is a flesh and blood
Speaker 2: avatar of a much more numerous, powerful, and radically dissatisfied demographic,
Speaker 2: never married, and childless American women between the ages of
Speaker 2: twenty and forty five. Why is he writing this well
Speaker 2: because jd Vance has pointed this out, but he gets
Speaker 2: a lot of criticism for it. Look, I don't support
Speaker 2: jd Vance. I know he's part of the technocracy, so
Speaker 2: don't write me about all that. And I don't support
Speaker 2: any of these people. But they can identify some of
Speaker 2: the problems. You know. RFK Junior has done a good
Speaker 2: job of identifying some of the problems. Do I believe
Speaker 2: that he would fix them even if he was president. No,
Speaker 2: But he's done a good job in terms of identifying
Speaker 2: a lot of the different problems out there, with food,
Speaker 2: with drugs, with free speech and censorship and all the
Speaker 2: rest of this stuff. He's done a great job of
Speaker 2: some of those things. But that doesn't mean it's one
Speaker 2: thing to run as a candidate and to identify problems
Speaker 2: and to point out problems that everybody else wants to
Speaker 2: pretend don't exist and that it's something all together different
Speaker 2: to do something about them when you become president. That
Speaker 2: was the difference between Trump in twenty sixteen and Trump
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty. Anyway, back to this, Aside from mass immigration,
Speaker 2: the most striking demographic development of the past decade is
Speaker 2: a large cohort of American women who have embraced the
Speaker 2: helping hand of the state in place of the increasingly
Speaker 2: suspect protections of fathers, brothers, boyfriends, husbands. In doing so,
Speaker 2: they become the Democrat Party's most enthusiastic and decisive constituency.
Speaker 2: According to a recent Puce survey, these brides of the state,
Speaker 2: they call it bots, support Democrats are Republicans by whopping
Speaker 2: seventy two to twenty four percent, providing the party with
Speaker 2: his entire advantage in both national and most state elections.
Speaker 2: Married American women, by contrast, support Republicans fifty to forty five,
Speaker 2: which more or less matches the pro Republican margin and
Speaker 2: every other age and gender demographic. Without the overwhelming support
Speaker 2: of bots for the Democrats. In other words, America would
Speaker 2: be solid majority Republican country. I think that's interesting. Hence
Speaker 2: the focus on abortion, Hence the focus on women without children.
Speaker 2: Even James Carvill said it. They're not hectoring James Carvill
Speaker 2: for pointing out what hectoring? Uh? How now these uh,
Speaker 2: these dictatorial childless women are are bossing everybody around.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 2: He pointed that out, and yet nobody says anything about that.
Speaker 2: It is obviously an issue, but we you know, it
Speaker 2: is the elephant in the room, if you will. But
Speaker 2: they're not really doing anything about it. So let's take
Speaker 2: a look at the great replacement. Where we are now
Speaker 2: with the last week we talked about what was happening
Speaker 2: in Aurora, Colorado, and kind of related story here. You know,
Speaker 2: we talk about DEI. Well, DEI can also mean bringing
Speaker 2: in people and putting them on the job, even if
Speaker 2: they're not trained. Right, you've got the immigrant program and
Speaker 2: you can get people in and put them on the
Speaker 2: assembly line. And there are accusations that this is what
Speaker 2: happened with Bor's head. I mentioned earlier. You've got a
Speaker 2: lot of people who have died, over fifty people or
Speaker 2: in the hospital and Boar's head. When the inspectors went there,
Speaker 2: they found mold, bugs, listeria, all kinds of stuff because
Speaker 2: it was not being properly maintained. According to the Associated Press,
Speaker 2: at least nine people have died two Desks in South Carolina,
Speaker 2: one each, and Farida in Mexico, Tennessee three deaths previously
Speaker 2: confirmed by people who lived in Illinois, New Jersey, Virginia.
Speaker 2: Fifty seven people sickened and hospitalized in the outbreak. The
Speaker 2: listeria infections are caused by a hardy type of bacteria.
Speaker 2: They can survive and even thrive during refrigeration. An estimated
Speaker 2: sixteen hundred people get listeria food poisoning each year, about
Speaker 2: two hundred and sixty die. According to the CDC. Infections
Speaker 2: can be hard to pinpoint because the symptoms may occur quickly,
Speaker 2: or it could take ten weeks after eating contaminated food.
Speaker 2: It's almost as difficult to find as a vaccine injury. Right,
Speaker 2: that delayed response. The disturbing news comes right on the
Speaker 2: heels of Boarhead's DEI refugee program where they hire, train
Speaker 2: and mentor migrants. Is there a connection.
Speaker 1: I've been saying that since this furse came out.
Speaker 2: I knew this was going to come out, as this
Speaker 2: is so obvious, so so obvious, that's right, Yeah, well,
Speaker 2: you know we had this isn't our first roudio on
Speaker 2: this thing. Either remember that Choe Banni. I got sued
Speaker 2: because I pointed this out about Chobanni. And Chobanni come
Speaker 2: in and as the guy who comes from Kurtistan, and
Speaker 2: he was given, you know, golden ticket to come in.
Speaker 2: And you even had Democrat senators in New York. You
Speaker 2: had Schumer and Kristen Gillibrand, who replaced Hillary Clinton in
Speaker 2: New York. They set this guy up with a factory
Speaker 2: to do Greek yogurt up in New York. And during
Speaker 2: the Obama administration had Michelle Obama move all of the
Speaker 2: lunch room program and say, oh, you need to get yogurt,
Speaker 2: and you need to get Greek yogurt.
Speaker 5: You know.
Speaker 2: And well, by the way, you know, he makes this
Speaker 2: great stuff, Joe Bonnian. So he was he was obviously
Speaker 2: brought in and set up for success. And then he
Speaker 2: sets up another second factory because he's now got so
Speaker 2: much business with all the school lunches and everything. He
Speaker 2: sets up another one in Idaho. I think it's Sioux Falls, Idaho,
Speaker 2: something like that. And there was some crime issue that
Speaker 2: had happened there. There was a cloud over some are
Speaker 2: committed from some migrants. But as soon as they cleared
Speaker 2: Chobani of any involvement in it. They had sixty minutes
Speaker 2: ran this puff piece about what a great entrepreneur he was. Hey, look,
Speaker 2: you know, you give me a yogurt factory, give me
Speaker 2: a chocolate factory. I'll be the next Willie Wonka. Okay,
Speaker 2: it's not rocket science to do some of this stuff.
Speaker 2: Right and over and above that, we realized that he
Speaker 2: was playing fitsies with the regime because he was bringing
Speaker 2: in all these different people from other countries, and some
Speaker 2: of the people had pointed out that in his factories.
Speaker 2: He said, I love these people so much, I've hired
Speaker 2: interpreters so they don't have to learn English. And so
Speaker 2: we have all these interpreters on the floor to help
Speaker 2: people communicate with each other. And it's like that seems
Speaker 2: like an awful waste of money, but it works out
Speaker 2: because you see, if they don't speak English, they can't
Speaker 2: go work anywhere else. So he'd bring people in from,
Speaker 2: you know, some places where they speak these these rare languages,
Speaker 2: but he'd bring along an interpret it' hire somebody to
Speaker 2: be an interpreter, and they don't learn English, and so
Speaker 2: they're trapped in that job forever and so once this
Speaker 2: court case was over, that was a cloud over their
Speaker 2: immigrant practices that were there. Then, you know, sixty minutes
Speaker 2: ran this puff piece and I talked about it, and
Speaker 2: I showed how they were rewarding these people, foreign business
Speaker 2: people who will come in and do what they want. Right,
Speaker 2: you don't think that's happening at Google other places like
Speaker 2: that as well, And so I talked about it from
Speaker 2: that perspective. They got wrapped into the nightly news and
Speaker 2: then pulled out. The comments were made by someone else
Speaker 2: at the beginning of it, and then it was published
Speaker 2: up as I put it up, as I was talking
Speaker 2: about crony capitalism, about their immigration agenda and all the
Speaker 2: rest of stuff, and I called it Chamani's own Private Idaho.
Speaker 2: Alex hated ponds like that, and so did the other
Speaker 2: people there. So they took that down and then they
Speaker 2: put it up as something about child rapist or something
Speaker 2: like that. It's like, no, and I changed I had
Speaker 2: Travis change it. Yeah, I had to change it twice,
Speaker 2: and they kept changing it back. He changed it, he
Speaker 2: changed that, They changed it back, He changed it again.
Speaker 2: They changed it back. And then with that child rapist thing,
Speaker 2: which had just been found false in the court. We
Speaker 2: all got sued individually and collectively. But you know, Alex
Speaker 2: paid it off or whatever cost him a bunch of
Speaker 2: money for that kind of But look, that's what's happening
Speaker 2: with these different companies that come in, and it's all
Speaker 2: tied in with the immigrant stuff, and so that's you know,
Speaker 2: that's why Travis was not surprised that this was what
Speaker 2: was happening with Bores. Had they want to bring in
Speaker 2: cheap immigrant labor. Maybe they're not training them very well.
Speaker 2: Somebody's not doing their job. It's filthy, and now the
Speaker 2: whole company looks like it's possibly going to go down
Speaker 2: the tubes. Bors had proudly displayed their DEI initiatives on
Speaker 2: their website, where they bragged about their programs, including focusing
Speaker 2: on refugees. Borshead is part of the Tent Coalition for
Speaker 2: Refugees in the US, exploring hiring, training, and mentoring opportunities
Speaker 2: for refugees. Inspectors, however, turned up dozens of violations at
Speaker 2: their plant in Virginia, now linked to the nationwide recall
Speaker 2: of Deli meat. And when you look at what the
Speaker 2: Department of Agriculture found, they said, according to records that
Speaker 2: have been released, Mold mildew insects repeatedly found throughout the site.
Speaker 2: But's what is this Tent coalition, Well, it goes back
Speaker 2: to twenty twenty one. That was when we got out
Speaker 2: of Afghanistan and we had a big tent to bring
Speaker 2: all the Afghan refugees in people fleeing Afghanistan. They had
Speaker 2: thirty three major companies because again, these companies are going
Speaker 2: to do what the federal government wants them to do,
Speaker 2: because it's a pay to play type of thing. Right,
Speaker 2: you do what we want you to do. You help
Speaker 2: us with the optics on this or this other social
Speaker 2: issue will clear the way for you to have an oligarchy,
Speaker 2: if not a monopoly. So you had companies like Amazon, Facebook, Pfizer,
Speaker 2: Tyson Foods announced that they would join the Tent Coalition
Speaker 2: for Afghan Refugees back in twenty twenty one. The new
Speaker 2: coalitions of the announcement is spearheaded by the Tent Partnership
Speaker 2: for Refugees, a network of over one hundred and eighty
Speaker 2: globalist businesses. They say global business, but this globalist business,
Speaker 2: it's these multinational corporations that are part of their stakeholders
Speaker 2: and they're either going to drive a stack through our
Speaker 2: heart or we're going to try the stake through their heart.
Speaker 2: One hundred and eighty global businesses integrating refugees to help
Speaker 2: Afghans to better integrate into the American economy. How about
Speaker 2: the veterans? You do anything about the veterans from Afghanistan
Speaker 2: or just the Afghan refugees. You want to put them manufactories,
Speaker 2: have them cleaning machinery at boards, said Albert Borla. By
Speaker 2: the way, at CEO of Pfizer. He was bragging about
Speaker 2: his participation in the Tent Coalition for Afghan Refugees. We're
Speaker 2: proud to join. We'll be undertaking a number of projects
Speaker 2: in support of Afghan refugees and special migrants. You know,
Speaker 2: as all this stuff is happening boeing over the weekend.
Speaker 2: What they call the thing the star Liner is like
Speaker 2: what you call it the lost in what was the
Speaker 2: Jupiter one or something that's their lost in space. That's
Speaker 2: what they call the spaceship and lost in space. But
Speaker 2: on the Jupiter one where they're marooned in space, they
Speaker 2: started hearing these strange noises and he's got his phone
Speaker 2: or whatever. I guess they got phone service up there,
Speaker 2: I don't know, of some sort. He played it for
Speaker 2: the people in NASA and they said, okay, we got it,
Speaker 2: we're on it now. Now it stops, so everything is fine.
Speaker 2: But it was this creepy, weird noise that was coming
Speaker 2: from the Jupiter one warning Will Robinson. One point six
Speaker 2: million migrants of the UK are costing taxpayers. They're eight
Speaker 2: point five billion pounds. And that doesn't even include the
Speaker 2: cost of asylum seekers who are routinely placed into four
Speaker 2: star hotels, as well as foreign students. Giuse you on
Speaker 2: these foreign students. It's really the bread and butter of
Speaker 2: these universities, especially in the United States. I mean, the
Speaker 2: actual cost to British taxpayer is probably much much higher. Well,
Speaker 2: in the United States, it's far worse than that. As
Speaker 2: a matter of fact, in the United States is not
Speaker 2: eight point five billion pounds. It's one hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: billion dollars. Now, you know the eight point five billion pounds,
Speaker 2: that might be like ten billion or something like that,
Speaker 2: but here's one hundred and fifty billion and one year
Speaker 2: and one year, US taxpayers paid one hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: billion dollars to care for illegal aliens just last year,
Speaker 2: and Wokeness put that up on Twitter and said, but
Speaker 2: a five billion dollar wall is too expensive. Well, the
Speaker 2: problem is a five billion dollar wall ain't going to
Speaker 2: cut it, because if you're paying these people and giving
Speaker 2: them free jobs, and you're doing everything for them, they're
Speaker 2: going to find a way to get in. They're not stupid.
Speaker 2: Colorado Mayor has asked for the eviction of the Venezuelan
Speaker 2: migrant gang. They're asking again the squatter stuff. It's just
Speaker 2: so absurd laws that are in so many of these
Speaker 2: different states. Somebody comes in and they occupy your home
Speaker 2: and you can't get them out, you can't evict them.
Speaker 2: Everybody knows what's going on. It's news reports all over
Speaker 2: the place. How you've got Venezuelan gangs have gone in
Speaker 2: and taken over several apartment complexes. They've had shootouts and
Speaker 2: parking lots, they of stores like Walmart parking lot of
Speaker 2: where they've got trash all of the place, fights and
Speaker 2: shootouts and everything. And they've completely taken over several apartment complexes.
Speaker 2: And so officials are asking the courts to let them
Speaker 2: evict the Venezuelan migrant gangs. They don't want to and
Speaker 2: the governor there, Governor Paulis who's on he is a
Speaker 2: comrade of La La, He's on the Marxist team there.
Speaker 2: For sure. He doesn't want to do anything about it either.
Speaker 2: He just dismisses it not interesting at all to him. Yet,
Speaker 2: this is a woman who was a foreign were a
Speaker 2: resident of one of these apartment complexes, talking to Fox News.
Speaker 3: Councilwoman Darinsky, who has been amazing. My first conversation with her,
Speaker 3: she said, she said, do you still live there? And
Speaker 3: I said yes, And she said, I'm going to get
Speaker 3: you out of there. Wow, going to make it my work.
Speaker 8: So you're singing her praises. In the meantime, the office
Speaker 8: of Governor Jared Paulus is saying she's making all of
Speaker 8: this up. Listen to what a spokesman said. According to
Speaker 8: police intelligence, this purported invasion, I guess of these apartment
Speaker 8: buildings is largely a feature of Danielle Jurinsky's imagination.
Speaker 1: What do you say to.
Speaker 3: That, you can't fake video and police within the last
Speaker 3: five minutes on that property.
Speaker 8: Wow, here's what daniel minutes. Here's what Danielle said about it.
Speaker 2: Listen to this.
Speaker 9: I absolutely did not make any of this up. I
Speaker 9: love how our governor has quickly rushed in to say
Speaker 9: that that's the actual problem here. But the actual problem
Speaker 9: here are his weak policies that have turned this state
Speaker 9: into a breeding ground for this gang activity.
Speaker 8: Sidney, why do you think the governor's office has got
Speaker 8: its head stuck firmly in the sand over this issue.
Speaker 3: They don't want to admit that they're part of the problem.
Speaker 3: It's the administration who we count on to make the
Speaker 3: rules for They are coming in with guns, make the guideline.
Speaker 3: I call nine to one one, No help comes for me.
Speaker 1: No help.
Speaker 3: There's no mass amounts of police that show up to
Speaker 3: make sure that we're defended.
Speaker 2: Nobody showed up to help me.
Speaker 3: I didn't have a bulletproof vest I didn't have five
Speaker 3: officers showing up with me. Whenever there was a problem,
Speaker 3: we were on our own and we were left to die.
Speaker 3: No registration in this country.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the guns, shootouts, all the rest of the stuff.
Speaker 2: The governor says, they're just making this up. He's the
Speaker 2: guy who makes up genders for children. Okay, but everybody
Speaker 2: else's I played for you last week. People all different demographics,
Speaker 2: people who live in the area. Y'all can't believe this.
Speaker 2: Look at what's going on, and it is absolutely insane.
Speaker 2: One person, as he was filming it, I nearly got
Speaker 2: run over. But of course it's just their imagination. California Assembly, meanwhile,
Speaker 2: has passed a bill banning local voter ID requirements no
Speaker 2: voter ID. Seen this rodeo before as well. I mentioned before.
Speaker 2: I'll say it real quickly once again. Friend of my
Speaker 2: brother in laws who went to vote in North Carolina
Speaker 2: where they had no voter ID laws. I don't know
Speaker 2: where the law is right now or not. And they
Speaker 2: had the longest voting period of any state in North Carolina.
Speaker 2: And so he goes on election date to vote. I said,
Speaker 2: you've already voted. What I haven't voted? Oh, yeah, you have.
Speaker 2: And this other person at your address and then mentioned
Speaker 2: the name. He says, that's my mother. She's been dead
Speaker 2: for years. No ID, no ID. That's what the Democrats want,
Speaker 2: and so you know, it's it should be the only
Speaker 2: thing that we need an ID for that and uh,
Speaker 2: you know for the mark of the beast that both
Speaker 2: the Republicans and the Democrats want to impose, honest, but
Speaker 2: they're not going to do it for that on rumble
Speaker 2: marky Mark, thank you for the tip. He says, it's
Speaker 2: a shame about Boorshead. There used to be good and
Speaker 2: trusted brand. If you wanted Deli meats, there was none better. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Proverbs twenty two says a good name is rather to
Speaker 2: be chosen than great riches. That's right, and when you
Speaker 2: lose that many times you lose everything. But it doesn't
Speaker 2: always work that way. Sometimes you can lie to people
Speaker 2: straight to their face and get away with it. Look
Speaker 2: at Fauci, look at the politic, or like at Alex.
Speaker 2: I confronted him about the stop to steal stuff. I said, Alex,
Speaker 2: you know that everybody's going to know this is a
Speaker 2: lie just a couple of days, because they haven't sent
Speaker 2: twenty thousand people out to arrest frauds after the election.
Speaker 2: But he got away with it. He emerged from it
Speaker 2: bigger than ever. It just is absolutely may have been. Anyway,
Speaker 2: we're going to take a quick break and we'll be
Speaker 2: right back analyzing the globalists next move. And now the
Speaker 2: deep a nutshell. I thought this is a very interesting
Speaker 2: article look at income and taxation relative to gold, and
Speaker 2: of course when you look at the creation of the
Speaker 2: Federal Reserve and the creation of the income tax. They
Speaker 2: were right there together, hand and glove, because it was
Speaker 2: part of a complete restructuring of our taxation system, of
Speaker 2: our financial system. Prior to that, the government, much smaller
Speaker 2: than it is now, operated primarily off of tariffs at
Speaker 2: the border, and within the border, it was a free
Speaker 2: trade zone. Then they decided that they wanted to have
Speaker 2: no tariffs at the border essentially, but to come after
Speaker 2: each and every one of us individually, hence the internal
Speaker 2: revenue service as opposed to external and that was their
Speaker 2: hand and glove with the creation of the Federal Reserve.
Speaker 2: As Clint Signer points out, gold and silver prices moved
Speaker 2: higher for a second week. The odds of a September
Speaker 2: rate cut by the Federal Reserve were bolstered by comments
Speaker 2: from Jerome Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve. The odds
Speaker 2: of a rate cut also got a boost on the
Speaker 2: Bureau of Labor Statistics announced their massive restructuring of the
Speaker 2: lie that they told us about jobs. So you know
Speaker 2: all those jobs we told you were created by Biden,
Speaker 2: Well almost a million of them were not. And they're
Speaker 2: doing that to make the trend look better and the
Speaker 2: run up to the election. That's why they always do that.
Speaker 2: It turns out the unbelievable jobs report was just what
Speaker 2: skeptics thought it was nonsense. So stimulus addicted markets like
Speaker 2: the stock market, the S and P five hundred closing
Speaker 2: back to near all time highs. It'd be hard to
Speaker 2: overstate just how profound a couple of changes made to
Speaker 2: US law in nineteen thirteen have been for American society.
Speaker 2: You look at how our entire economy is being manipulated
Speaker 2: by the Federal Reserve, and how many people warned that
Speaker 2: was going to be the case. Charles Lindberg's father was
Speaker 2: a Senator at the time. I mentioned him in the
Speaker 2: report that I did about the creation of the Federal Reserve.
Speaker 2: It's interesting that that report was censored five years before
Speaker 2: there was any censorship of alex Or Info Wars or
Speaker 2: anything like that. I mean, years later, Facebook was coming
Speaker 2: to him to be one of the first people on
Speaker 2: Facebook to do video that type of thing, but they
Speaker 2: didn't want anything out there about the Federal Reserve creation.
Speaker 2: So if you go back, and this is what I
Speaker 2: thought was interesting about the story. Gold was valued in
Speaker 2: nineteen thirteen at twenty dollars an ounce. Nineteen sixteen, the
Speaker 2: average annual income at that point in time was six
Speaker 2: hundred dollars a year, and so it's kind of hard
Speaker 2: to get your head around stuff like that, right, But
Speaker 2: start thinking about not the price of gold, but the
Speaker 2: price of things in gold. And that's what he did,
Speaker 2: he said. In other words, a typical husband earned about
Speaker 2: thirty ounces of gold per year. So think of it
Speaker 2: that way, right, nineteen sixteen, a husband would earn one way.
Speaker 2: A husband could earn thirty ounces of gold. Well, what
Speaker 2: happens today when you look at the average income and
Speaker 2: you look at the price of gold, the average salary
Speaker 2: to day is roughly sixty thousand or twenty four ounces.
Speaker 2: In other words, it's twenty percent below what it was
Speaker 2: all those decades ago. So you get a real feel
Speaker 2: for what inflation is. With the value of the dollar,
Speaker 2: the fiat dollar, the made up dollar, is always changing
Speaker 2: in value. And so single wayjourner would make about thirty
Speaker 2: ounces nineteen sixteen, here we are, a century later, make
Speaker 2: twenty four ounces a year. Now it takes two way
Speaker 2: journers in most households to produce the gold equivalent income
Speaker 2: that a single earner achieved in nineteen thirteen. But the
Speaker 2: picture gets dramatically worse when you bring in income taxes,
Speaker 2: because in nineteen sixteen there wasn't any income tax. They
Speaker 2: had started through. But at that point in time, and
Speaker 2: I've said this many times, you know what they talk about, Well,
Speaker 2: we got this wealth tax of this unrealized gain tax,
Speaker 2: gains tax, they call it. But it's only going to
Speaker 2: be for the really, really rich people. Well that's the
Speaker 2: why they always start these taxes in nineteen sixteen. The
Speaker 2: original income tax, if you adjust it for for earnings today,
Speaker 2: for the value of the dollar today, that means that
Speaker 2: your first three hundred and sixty thousand dollars a year
Speaker 2: would those earning above three hundred sixty thousand dollars a
Speaker 2: year would be paying income tax. I'm sorry, that's not
Speaker 2: even adjusted. So when the average person was making six
Speaker 2: hundred dollars a year, the income tax didn't kick in
Speaker 2: until you started making three hundred and sixty thousand dollars
Speaker 2: a year. But the average person is making six hundred
Speaker 2: a year, and then the top rate was thirty five percent.
Speaker 2: It would get progressively more if you were a millionaire
Speaker 2: or whatever. But the most that you would pay in
Speaker 2: nineteen thirteen was going to be thirty five percent. Now
Speaker 2: La La Harris wants to make it forty five percent,
Speaker 2: and she wants to tax unrealized gains as well. But
Speaker 2: don't worry, it's just for the really wealthy people. How
Speaker 2: that work out for us with the income tax? And
Speaker 2: don't forget said that forty three US states have their
Speaker 2: own income taxes also to compound the burden. I've pointed
Speaker 2: out many times that when you go back you don't
Speaker 2: even have to go back to nineteen thirteen, go back
Speaker 2: to the nineteen fifties, and we had pretty much two
Speaker 2: parent homes. Certainly, yeah, there'd be a death of a spouse,
Speaker 2: divorce would happen, but it was rare, you know, a
Speaker 2: lot more rare than mRNA adverse effects. But you know,
Speaker 2: when you had one person saying they're raising the kids,
Speaker 2: another one who's making the money, you had if you
Speaker 2: look at what has happened from that point in time,
Speaker 2: the nineteen fifties to the nineteen eighties. I went over
Speaker 2: that statistic many times when I was running for office,
Speaker 2: and I said, if you look at what has happened,
Speaker 2: the government has grown to the extent that now we
Speaker 2: have to have two wage earners, and most of the
Speaker 2: typical second wage earner, the mom who has her job
Speaker 2: split between family obligations and job obligations, most of her
Speaker 2: money is going to pay for the increase in income taxes,
Speaker 2: which were only two percent for the typical family of
Speaker 2: four and the nineteen fifties a lot more than that
Speaker 2: at that point in time. And so if you look
Speaker 2: at what was happening, the government had grown to the
Speaker 2: burden forcing even in a two parent home, forcing both
Speaker 2: parents to work, and of course they need childcare, so
Speaker 2: let's ship the kids off to school. This is the
Speaker 2: basis of all this stuff. The taxes really do shape
Speaker 2: our lives. Kamala is going to drive gold to ten
Speaker 2: thousand dollars, says James Hickman. He said, the reality is
Speaker 2: a very good case we made that gold is still
Speaker 2: quite cheap compared to the trajectory. It's possible that a
Speaker 2: few years, twenty five hundred dollars goal could look remarkably inexpensive.
Speaker 2: It wasn't that long ago that we're looking at about
Speaker 2: twelve hundred dollars goal. Not to be overly dramatic, but
Speaker 2: Harris is a big reason why, he says. He says
Speaker 2: it's funny because I seem to remember aoc saying that
Speaker 2: no one ever makes a billion dollars. You can take
Speaker 2: a billion dollars, she said, Well, he says, in this
Speaker 2: particular case, I'm inclined to agree with AOC. LA LA
Speaker 2: took eight billion dollars from Biden, the legitimate nominee. She
Speaker 2: raised another half billion by making the most outrageous claims
Speaker 2: and lying without ever bothering to set for a basic interview,
Speaker 2: take legitimate questions. Her plans will undoubtedly cause higher deficits
Speaker 2: and more inflation, and by the way, so will Trump's.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, it was Trump's three and
Speaker 2: a half trillion dollars. I remember the only person who
Speaker 2: opposed him, the only person who opposed him, Republican or Democrat,
Speaker 2: was Thomas Massey. He said, this is outrageous, and I'm
Speaker 2: going to demand that everybody come back and have vote.
Speaker 2: We can't come back, We'll all die. Nobody did. They're
Speaker 2: pretty old, they're not very healthy. Nobody died. But he
Speaker 2: did get that vote, and Trump was outraged and wanted
Speaker 2: to primary him out. Unfortunately, he was unable to but
Speaker 2: three and a half trillion dollars, and then that precedent
Speaker 2: was continued by Biden and increased a bit. So holding
Speaker 2: gold yields better returns than even mining for it. With
Speaker 2: spot goal prices at record highs, investors that might expect
Speaker 2: the shares of precious metal mining companies would also be
Speaker 2: trading at record highs. By and large, though that's not
Speaker 2: the case. The mining company's stock is not going up.
Speaker 2: Mining stocks, as represented by the Hui Gold Bugs Index,
Speaker 2: are still underwater by more than forty percent compared to
Speaker 2: their highs back in twenty eleven, and that's despite being
Speaker 2: pulled up significantly this year by soaring gold and silver prices.
Speaker 2: Even when the value of a mine's end product silver
Speaker 2: or gold goes up, the costs of getting it out
Speaker 2: of the ground can go up even faster. During periods
Speaker 2: on the market, prices for metals fall below of mining
Speaker 2: companies all in sustaining costs. Some of them choose to
Speaker 2: sell at a loss rather than shut down everything, fire
Speaker 2: their employees, and then if they want to start back up,
Speaker 2: who are going to hire. They've found jobs somewhere else,
Speaker 2: So sometimes they would sell it at a loss, he said,
Speaker 2: but there would be another option. He says. It's kind
Speaker 2: of strange that the CEOs haven't taken this. He says,
Speaker 2: why don't they hold some of the gold on their
Speaker 2: books as a reserve asset instead of immediately exchanging it
Speaker 2: for dollars regardless of the prevailing price. Gold is considered
Speaker 2: by the Bank for International Settlements to be a Tier
Speaker 2: one asset within the banking system. That means as globally
Speaker 2: recognized as a high quality capital reserve asset. That's why
Speaker 2: the central banks are buying so much of it and
Speaker 2: hoarding it. Central bankers around the world agree, but with
Speaker 2: few exceptions, the large corporations that are mining it, including
Speaker 2: major gold and silver producers, have failed to bolster their
Speaker 2: own finances with sound money backing. So question is, are
Speaker 2: you missing that opportunity? Even the gold mining companies are
Speaker 2: missing the opportunity in some cases to bolster their wealth
Speaker 2: protection if you will, by accumulating their own product. Sometimes
Speaker 2: you have to sometimes you have to think out of
Speaker 2: the box, and they're just in a habit of not
Speaker 2: doing that, I guess. But if you want to not
Speaker 2: make that mistake, you can start to set up wealth
Speaker 2: protection go to David and I Die Gold. That'll take
Speaker 2: you to Tony Rdman. Is why is wolf Gold. You
Speaker 2: can buy gold, silver, large or small amounts. You can
Speaker 2: set up an IRA or transfer your money from an
Speaker 2: IRA into metals there. And he's also set up something
Speaker 2: that most goal dealers don't do, and that is the
Speaker 2: wolf Pack where you can sign up for a certain
Speaker 2: amount each month, starting at fifty dollars. Actually there's a
Speaker 2: kid's version that starts at thirty five, but he's got
Speaker 2: different levels there that you can buy into it. And
Speaker 2: that way you can just set up on a regular basis,
Speaker 2: you can start to set some money aside as a
Speaker 2: hedge against inflation, a hedge against economic collapse, a hedge
Speaker 2: against central bank digital currencies, against a lot of things.
Speaker 2: And that's central bank digital currency. To me, that's the
Speaker 2: big issue, and that's the new threat. We see what
Speaker 2: is happening with financial system and inflation. But the CBDC
Speaker 2: is a new thing, so you can start to accumulate
Speaker 2: on a gradual basis. As part of that club, you
Speaker 2: can always get a group buying discount. And again you
Speaker 2: can get there at Davidnight dot Gold. I'll take you
Speaker 2: to Tony Ardban's wisewolf and let him know that you
Speaker 2: came through us. Davidnight dot Gold. We're gonna take a
Speaker 2: quick break and we'll be right back. They're doing what
Speaker 2: in the place they named after me. Good thing. I
Speaker 2: have the David Knight Show to keep me informed on
Speaker 2: the plots of these traders. Making sense common again, this
Speaker 2: is the David Knight Show. Talk a little bit about
Speaker 2: the battery electric vehicles, a lot of back and forth,
Speaker 2: and even to the extent that the big cheerleaders and
Speaker 2: a lot of these leftist organizations are saying, yeah, I
Speaker 2: know it looks really bad, but you know this is
Speaker 2: a difficult time. We're in the middle of this transition,
Speaker 2: and don't abandon these things yet. We're going to get there.
Speaker 2: Is is that if we look at this, it shares
Speaker 2: a couple of common features with the pandemic mcguffin. First
Speaker 2: of all, both of them were about a phony problem,
Speaker 2: a non existent crisis. And then the other thing they
Speaker 2: share in common is that both of them, we only
Speaker 2: had one solution that would be possible for the phony
Speaker 2: crisis that in and of itself should be a tip
Speaker 2: off a lot of people. That was the tip off
Speaker 2: for them. They would. At the beginning, you had some
Speaker 2: doctors and some people in the medical profession that said, well,
Speaker 2: we got an idea. This is what you say is happening.
Speaker 2: Here's a way that we could something we could do about. No,
Speaker 2: shut up, We're going to lock everybody down and wait
Speaker 2: for the vaccine. That's that period, because that's what they'd
Speaker 2: practiced for twenty years, starting two months before nine eleven
Speaker 2: with Dark Winter. So it's one solution and one solution only.
Speaker 2: Anything else had to be demonized, but that one solution.
Speaker 2: No matter how bad that solution was, no matter how
Speaker 2: expensive that solution was, it was going to be subsidized.
Speaker 2: It was going to be forced down people's throats or
Speaker 2: into their arms or whatever. And that's what we're seeing
Speaker 2: here with the climate mcguffin, same thing that we saw
Speaker 2: with the pandemic. Mcguffin. Two months into his presidency, Biden
Speaker 2: announced a two trillion dollar infrastructure plan. They called it
Speaker 2: the Inflation Reduction Act. Just just ridiculous. These people just
Speaker 2: mined dead, even with their labels, and nobody catches on
Speaker 2: two trillion dollar infrastructure plan that included one hundred and
Speaker 2: seventy four billion dollars in grants, subsidies, other payouts to
Speaker 2: encourage Americans to switch to battery electric vehicles. Since that
Speaker 2: initial investment quote unquote, not an investment, it's corruption, crony capitalism.
Speaker 2: Since that time, billions and billions more have been poured
Speaker 2: into what is increasingly a failing effort to convince or
Speaker 2: to cajole American buyers to switch. These huge expenditures together
Speaker 2: with COVID and war money. Said, see, even they understand
Speaker 2: there's a connection with that. This is from what's up
Speaker 2: with that dot com? Yeah, it's they share all the
Speaker 2: COVID mcguffin, the climate mcguffin, war, All that is set
Speaker 2: up to crash us. They bloom the national debt to
Speaker 2: the point seventy six percent of income taxes are needed
Speaker 2: just to pay the interest on that debt. No, they're not,
Speaker 2: They're not needed. The income taxes are not needed because
Speaker 2: they don't care about the deficit. They only care about
Speaker 2: the deficit if you want to cut taxes. That's the
Speaker 2: only time these people ever care about any deficit or
Speaker 2: about the accumulated debt. The fault lie is the very
Speaker 2: concept that the government knows best but isn't that what
Speaker 2: we bought into left and right. The government knows best.
Speaker 2: We can fix this if we just get Trump in.
Speaker 6: All.
Speaker 2: You know, we want Lola in because she knows she's
Speaker 2: gonna subsidize everything that we want. Well, there are a
Speaker 2: plethora of alternatives to battery electric vehicles, of course, and
Speaker 2: they list some of them here, including a wide variety
Speaker 2: of hydrogen powered engines and a new self rotating engine.
Speaker 2: None of these, however, have been blessed with massive subsidies.
Speaker 2: None of them would require a heavily subsidized nationwide charging
Speaker 2: station network either. So we had other things. If we
Speaker 2: had hydrogen powered engines, we wouldn't have to have the
Speaker 2: big chargings. Remember eight billion dollars and they got what
Speaker 2: seven charging stations built. We don't even need those charging
Speaker 2: stations if you go to some of these other alternatives.
Speaker 2: But so, even if we accept their lying premise that
Speaker 2: there is a problem, that there is global warming, and
Speaker 2: then the next premise that you got to accept is
Speaker 2: that it's man made. And then the next premise that
Speaker 2: you've got to accept is that their solutions are going
Speaker 2: to be a net savings of global none of those
Speaker 2: are true. It is a house of cards, and I
Speaker 2: think that we need to pull it down from the
Speaker 2: very first assumption about global warming, certainly about men make
Speaker 2: global warming. We ought to respond all this stuff the
Speaker 2: same way that we should be responding to all this
Speaker 2: pharmaceutical garbage. Prove it, Prove it. The New York Times
Speaker 2: back in twenty twenty one questioned the wisdom of Biden's
Speaker 2: big battery electric vehicle plunge. Someone by the name of
Speaker 2: Chatsshi Chatze wrote both that the one hundred and seventy
Speaker 2: four billion dollars might not be enough to push most
Speaker 2: Americans towards eves. Chatze was doubtful that federal largess, which
Speaker 2: merely shifts part of the costs of a battery electric
Speaker 2: vehicle from the buyer to the public, would come vents
Speaker 2: consumers of the benefits of electric vehicles. And it was
Speaker 2: right right, We know what the real agenda is, though
Speaker 2: at the time it was deemed as the only pathway
Speaker 2: toward a cleaner energy future. There's that mcguffin tip, right,
Speaker 2: we got a phony problem and we've got only one solution. Well, beware,
Speaker 2: if they're going to restrict everything to one solution, they're
Speaker 2: not serious about the problem. And that's why what woke
Speaker 2: a lot of people up about the pandemic. They said,
Speaker 2: if this really was a global pandemic, and if it
Speaker 2: was really killing people or had the potential to that
Speaker 2: you say it does, then it would be all hands
Speaker 2: on deck, everybody, bring your own solution. Let's find us
Speaker 2: something's going to stop it. Let's try everything. No, when
Speaker 2: you pull back and you roll this out iteratively in stages,
Speaker 2: when you say we're going to wait for the final solution,
Speaker 2: then we know what this is all about. And this
Speaker 2: climate mcguffin was designed for dependency, it was designed for control.
Speaker 2: It was designed for the elimination of private cars, including
Speaker 2: the battery electric vehicles. It's just like the schools. We
Speaker 2: look at the schools and say, well, these schools are
Speaker 2: not working. No, they are. They're doing exactly what they
Speaker 2: were designed to do.
Speaker 3: So.
Speaker 2: A recent article noted that Stilantis is investing six billion
Speaker 2: dollars to build a generation of motors capable of running
Speaker 2: on gasoline or on Brazilian ethanol and combined with plug
Speaker 2: in hybrid technology. Coher Engines last year unveiled a KDH
Speaker 2: hydrogen internal combustion engine BMW Toyota Triton EV, Hyundai All
Speaker 2: and many other automakers are also building hydrogen fueled internal
Speaker 2: combustion engines. The tech isn't the issue, though, government is,
Speaker 2: and the fact that people are coming up with these
Speaker 2: alternatives even without government subsidization, and the fact that they're
Speaker 2: being rejected and disallowed, should be the big signal of
Speaker 2: what's going on here. Just last week and the Report
Speaker 2: touted a liquid nitrogen engine based on nineteen nineties research
Speaker 2: at the University of Washington that even with a one
Speaker 2: hundred gallon nitrogen tank, is cheaper and lighter than a
Speaker 2: battery electric vehicle. And again weight matters. If you're going
Speaker 2: to look at this as overall picture, that kind of
Speaker 2: efficiency should matter. You're going to be using more energy
Speaker 2: to haul something around this heavy. The operation is akin
Speaker 2: to that of a steam driven engine. Hey, we can
Speaker 2: all have a steampunk future. Maybe it generates zero pllutants,
Speaker 2: it refuels at existing gas and diesel stations, and it
Speaker 2: only takes a few minutes. But Washington wants nothing other
Speaker 2: than an all electric motor vehicle that is completely tied
Speaker 2: to the electric grid. Why Because they want control, they
Speaker 2: want dependency, and they want to eliminate they want eliminate
Speaker 2: independent cars. Hydrogen fuel cells are ideal for the trucking
Speaker 2: industry because the refueling time and the driving range are
Speaker 2: comparable to diesel or gas trucks, and travel routes are predictable,
Speaker 2: which lowers the barrier for developing a fueling infrastructure. In
Speaker 2: other words, every truck stop in America could easily put
Speaker 2: in hydrogen tanks. Hydrogen would likely be an equally better
Speaker 2: choice for other heavy duty vehicles, including school buses, but
Speaker 2: the Biden administration has provided huge subsidies for the electric
Speaker 2: school bus. La La loves these things. I guess she
Speaker 2: thinks they run on pure joy. Here's one example, one
Speaker 2: county that went into it in Maryland. Probably it is
Speaker 2: Montgomery County. I don't know, but I'm assuming that it's
Speaker 2: a suburb of Washington, DC. Nobody else could be this
Speaker 2: cavalier with amount of money that they throw away. The
Speaker 2: Montgomery County, Maryland Public School District is the nation's largest
Speaker 2: purchaser of electric school buses. They bought three hundred and
Speaker 2: twenty six at a cost of one hundred and sixty
Speaker 2: eight million dollars. They're about a half a million dollars each.
Speaker 2: So how much does a diesel school bus cost new
Speaker 2: It costs between one hundred and two hundred thousand, not
Speaker 2: five hundred thousand, and if you can get amused anywhere
Speaker 2: from twenty to sixty thousand dollars. So they wasted a
Speaker 2: tremendous amount of money, and waste is understating it. From
Speaker 2: February twenty twenty two to March twenty twenty four, these
Speaker 2: electric buses failed to complete their routes two hundred and
Speaker 2: eighty times, and the repairs took an average of thirteen days.
Speaker 2: Last October, the school board felt the need to buy
Speaker 2: ninety diesel buses to make up for the failures of
Speaker 2: the electric buses. Nationwide, nine of the twenty one million
Speaker 2: plus bust students ride and diesel buses, with most of
Speaker 2: the rest relying on propane see and that in and
Speaker 2: of itself is unnecessary cost. I went all the way
Speaker 2: through high school going to schools that I could walk
Speaker 2: or ride my bike to. We had neighborhood schools. The
Speaker 2: bussing began in my junior and senior year of high school,
Speaker 2: and now everybody rides a bus everywhere all the time.
Speaker 2: It absolutely is crazy and a tremendous waste of time
Speaker 2: and money. So of course the fires. This was sent
Speaker 2: to me. This is yet another example of fires, this
Speaker 2: one at the Rivian automotive manufacturing facility. Investigators this is fine.
Speaker 2: Investigators are still trying to determine the cause of the blaze.
Speaker 2: Couldn't be the battery that blew up and exploded, right,
Speaker 2: And this is not the first time we've seen this
Speaker 2: happen at a factory. We also had this happen at
Speaker 2: a factory that was manufacturing large semi trailers, and big
Speaker 2: fire with that because those batteries are even bigger. But
Speaker 2: now it's kind of interesting because the insurance premiums are
Speaker 2: coming into play. The very fact that these things are
Speaker 2: difficult to put out, if not impossible. The thirteen percent
Speaker 2: of them reignite after the initial blazer, like one of
Speaker 2: these birthday candles that you try to blow out, keeps
Speaker 2: coming back, and they can explode with thermal runaway while
Speaker 2: they're being charged, if there's damage to the batteries, if
Speaker 2: there's extreme weather, anything like that. So now the insurance
Speaker 2: companies are paying attention. Would it be ironic if the
Speaker 2: insurance companies are actually there and actually preserved private vehicles
Speaker 2: by getting rid of this electric vehicle battery electric vehicle agenda.
Speaker 2: These explosions the higher repair costs for EV batteries are
Speaker 2: causing insurance companies take a closer look. So they've gone up.
Speaker 2: If they haven't dropped surance coverage for electric vehicles, as
Speaker 2: some of them have, they have risen. The premiums have
Speaker 2: risen significantly, a seventy two percent jump and average EV
Speaker 2: insurance costs compared with a twenty nine percent jump for
Speaker 2: gas vehicles, So they're soaking us both ways, but more
Speaker 2: than twice as much of an increase for the electric vehicles.
Speaker 2: Some EV owners are receiving insurance quotes of over one
Speaker 2: hundred and twenty dollars per week, while others are receiving
Speaker 2: quotes double or even triple the year before. And again,
Speaker 2: insurance company is just insane. I remember a guy that
Speaker 2: I used to work with bought an expensive fast motorcycle
Speaker 2: and they were going to charge him for insurance more
Speaker 2: than the price of the brand new vehicle every year.
Speaker 2: So how in the world can they justify that? First
Speaker 2: of all, you know, all you're talking about is a
Speaker 2: worst case scenario. Well, in a worst case scenario, the
Speaker 2: most rider is going to get killed. But in the
Speaker 2: second worst case scenario, the motorcycle is completely totaled. But
Speaker 2: they're going to charge you more than the price the
Speaker 2: replacement price of a brand new one each year. And
Speaker 2: how much damage is it going to do to some
Speaker 2: other vehicle? Not like any of the others anyway. The
Speaker 2: EV revolution, says the verge. Don't lose the faith. Never
Speaker 2: give up, says the leftist environmentalist. It's just going to
Speaker 2: take longer than we thought, so don't give up on
Speaker 2: it yet. Contrary to what you've heard, electric vehicle sales
Speaker 2: are up. Yes, I know, says the writer. I know.
Speaker 2: Tessa sales are down. Ford is scaling back as EV rollout.
Speaker 2: GM is delaying electric trucks and holding back on investing
Speaker 2: in EV battery construction. Hurts is off loading evs as
Speaker 2: its stock price is struggling. Automakers across the board are
Speaker 2: losing millions, some of them are losing billions. But hey,
Speaker 2: this is MRCA who cares about cost right, especially this person.
Speaker 2: They're fully on board with the climate things, so they
Speaker 2: don't care about costs, as they said the vibe they say,
Speaker 2: as they say is grim, and yet sales are still growing.
Speaker 2: We've had one point two million EV's will be sold
Speaker 2: in the US by the end of twenty twenty four,
Speaker 2: an increase over one million sold last year. Well, you
Speaker 2: know what, some people still want masks. These propaganda narratives
Speaker 2: die hard, not the batteries. The batteries are not Diard.
Speaker 2: The agenda is Diard. Evs are fine as long as
Speaker 2: they're not subsidized, you know, just as long as you
Speaker 2: want to pay for your own costs, as long as
Speaker 2: this is not used to ban all private cars, including evs.
Speaker 2: But this person says, well, no, it's not a problem.
Speaker 2: We're just in the middle of the messy middle of
Speaker 2: an EV revolution. Well, here's the fundamental thing, going back
Speaker 2: to emissions. A big study has been done fifteen hundred
Speaker 2: different practices that were mandated or implemented they were supposed
Speaker 2: to eliminate emissions. And they looked at this over fifteen
Speaker 2: hundred different practices over a over a twenty four year
Speaker 2: period in forty one different countries, and out of the
Speaker 2: fifteen hundred policies, only sixty three of them did anything
Speaker 2: with emissions. Now that's only four percent. And even though
Speaker 2: you're reducing the emissions, that doesn't mean that, you know,
Speaker 2: that doesn't have anything to do with warming. If there
Speaker 2: is global warming, it doesn't have anything to do with it.
Speaker 2: Because again CO two is zero point zero four percent
Speaker 2: of the atmosphere, only three percent of it they even claim,
Speaker 2: and they've probably inflated that only three percent of that
Speaker 2: CO two is produced by humans. And of all of
Speaker 2: these procedures to reduce that CO two emission, only four
Speaker 2: percent of them do anything to reduce any of it.
Speaker 2: So what does that tell you? Years ago, when we
Speaker 2: had a lawsuit against the TSA, when they were bringing
Speaker 2: the naked body scanners and the you know, the rest
Speaker 2: of this stuff, and the pat downs were escalating, there
Speaker 2: was a lawsuit and they found out that at the
Speaker 2: time there was opposition in Texas, and in response to
Speaker 2: that opposition, they threatened to close down every single flight
Speaker 2: in and out of Texas if they stopped the TSA
Speaker 2: from doing what they were the new procedure, their new
Speaker 2: iterative thing. Right, Well, now we got something else, you know,
Speaker 2: Now you got to do this, you know, well, if
Speaker 2: they stopped that, they threatened to stop all flights in
Speaker 2: and out. But at the same time in their internal
Speaker 2: documents those in twenty eleven they said there is currently
Speaker 2: no to airports or to airplanes, So why were they
Speaker 2: doing that? Well, we all know why they were doing it.
Speaker 2: And so even though you've only got four percent of
Speaker 2: these measures do even reduce anything, they're still going to
Speaker 2: have you do all ninety six percent of them that
Speaker 2: don't have any effect whatsoever. And just like with a TSA,
Speaker 2: if there's no threat, and if they are incompetent, and
Speaker 2: we've had studies, they won't give you the real percentage number.
Speaker 2: You know, how many times, what percentage of the time
Speaker 2: do they fail to identify weapons or something like that,
Speaker 2: But it's been hinted by congressmen who have seen that
Speaker 2: it is in the upper eighties to lower nineties percentile failure.
Speaker 2: So if they're only getting you know, ten percent of
Speaker 2: the things that are coming through, or even if it
Speaker 2: was twenty percent, if there really was a threat, we
Speaker 2: will have had a lot of terrorist events like we
Speaker 2: haven't had them. If they're if only four percent of
Speaker 2: these measures are doing anything, if the CO two is
Speaker 2: a problem, we would have a big problem, and we don't.
Speaker 2: That's across four sectors forty one countries two decades, two
Speaker 2: and a half. Actually they only found sixty three successful
Speaker 2: policy interventions out of over fifteen hundred. So that tells
Speaker 2: you why when you look at this Daily Caller put
Speaker 2: out an article, Democrats massive green energy agenda is walking
Speaker 2: America right into China's hand. China has always been the
Speaker 2: beta test site, the preferred model for the way they
Speaker 2: want the global system of slavery and the new global
Speaker 2: governance to work. It's one of the reasons why. In
Speaker 2: January of twenty twenty one, as this program began, I
Speaker 2: was on YouTube and when I put up the video
Speaker 2: that said twenty twenty, it was right at the beginning
Speaker 2: of the year, talking about what happened in twenty twenty.
Speaker 2: I said, twenty twenty was the year the world became China.
Speaker 2: That was it. Boom, Google got on my case and
Speaker 2: they shut me down within a couple first they suspended me,
Speaker 2: and then they found another one. They start doing a review,
Speaker 2: they found another one, and you know, I didn't even
Speaker 2: get back on air. They found three strikes to keep
Speaker 2: me off the air. After I put out that one
Speaker 2: thing that said twenty twenty was the year the world
Speaker 2: became China. Because that's what they want. They want the
Speaker 2: world to become China, and they don't want you to
Speaker 2: know that that's what they want. Other critics of the
Speaker 2: West climate policies that pointed out the continued use of fuel,
Speaker 2: especially coal, by populist countries like China and India will
Speaker 2: blunt globally mission reductions, while Western countries saddle themselves at
Speaker 2: the high cost of an energy transition. Who cares ninety
Speaker 2: six percent of their stuff doesn't work? And then the
Speaker 2: two countries that use the most energy don't have any
Speaker 2: restrictions on them. That's the Paris Climate Core. And so
Speaker 2: you've had these people who are true believers were very
Speaker 2: upset about that. They said, you're not doing anything to
Speaker 2: stop global emissions. All you're doing is transferring industry to
Speaker 2: China Bingo. China is by far the world's leading emitter,
Speaker 2: more than doubling America's emissions. Well, India is the third
Speaker 2: largest source, and it emits more than all the twenty
Speaker 2: seven countries of the EU combined India, and there's no
Speaker 2: restrictions on them, no restrictions on the quantity or the
Speaker 2: how clean or dirty these are. Meanwhile, AI is showing
Speaker 2: that These corporations don't really care about this stuff. They
Speaker 2: told you that it was an existential issue. The planet's
Speaker 2: going to melt. We've got to do everything. We got
Speaker 2: no amount of money. You know, we're going to have
Speaker 2: esg all the rest of the stuff now because they
Speaker 2: need a lot of power for AI. Forbes says, well,
Speaker 2: they're just saying forget about the climate stuff for now.
Speaker 2: They always know that if they've got AI, they can
Speaker 2: pull back, they can create a new mcguffin, or they
Speaker 2: can revive any of these old mcguffins. Because AI is
Speaker 2: their control tactic. That's how they're going to gaslight and
Speaker 2: control you is with artificial intelligence. That's how they're going
Speaker 2: to monitor what you do, surveil what you do, and
Speaker 2: censor what you hear. And propaganda issue as well. Google
Speaker 2: Microsoft once positioned themselves as leaders in sustainability, setting ambitious
Speaker 2: net zero goals to align with global environmental efforts. But
Speaker 2: now the rapid rise of AI that is so energy intensive,
Speaker 2: it's forcing these country companies to reconsider and even abandon
Speaker 2: these commitments so they can make money. Imagine that an
Speaker 2: exhibit a of all of this climate hypocrisy and energy
Speaker 2: hungary big tech sector is Elon Musk. He's building the
Speaker 2: world's largest super computer in Memphis, Tennessee, seven hundred and
Speaker 2: fifty thousand square foot vacant manufacturing plant in Memphis, and
Speaker 2: it's going to use more power than one hundred thousand homes. Again,
Speaker 2: each of these AI facilities is using more power than
Speaker 2: a pretty good sized city. And it's kind of interesting
Speaker 2: that they're looking to make this the fastest supercomputer and
Speaker 2: the other supercomputer that is currently the raining champion is
Speaker 2: at Oakridge Labs in eastern Tennessee. And where's all this
Speaker 2: electricity going to come from. It's going to come from
Speaker 2: the TVA, which is a real big issue for those
Speaker 2: of us who live in Tennessee because that means that
Speaker 2: the Feds. When the FEDS are running TVA, that means
Speaker 2: that there's no reality to any of this stuff. They've
Speaker 2: got an agenda, and their agenda is going to be
Speaker 2: to serve the supercomputers and they don't really care what
Speaker 2: it's going to do through electricity rates for the rest
Speaker 2: of us here. So Oakridge, Tennessee has the current big supercomputer.
Speaker 2: Now Elon Musk is looking to transcend that. When we
Speaker 2: look at what this is all about. I liked what
Speaker 2: what's up with that? Said? Energy transition is simply a
Speaker 2: federal bribe, bribes and bands. As I've said, for the
Speaker 2: most part, this is how the federal government works. And
Speaker 2: you need to tell your maga friends, explain to them.
Speaker 2: You know, they don't care what the Constitution says. They
Speaker 2: don't care where the Tenth Amendment says. They can bribe
Speaker 2: and they can ban strategically to get people do whatever
Speaker 2: they want. And that's what's happening right now. They are
Speaker 2: picking the winners and losers by the subsidies that they do.
Speaker 2: And you know it is subsidies are the only reason
Speaker 2: that they have these big facilities like wind and solar
Speaker 2: at commercial scale. Again, if you want to use it
Speaker 2: to get independence away from the energy grid, that's a
Speaker 2: good thing. And the economics are so distorted by subsidies,
Speaker 2: by subsidies from China, by subsidies from the US that
Speaker 2: even though as a Jason Barker's pointed out, there's more
Speaker 2: energy according to a lot of studies, more energy goes
Speaker 2: into creating a solar panel than you're going to get
Speaker 2: out in its lifetime. Even if that's true, if the
Speaker 2: government is heavily subsidizing these things and may make economic
Speaker 2: sense for you, and it might make sense for you
Speaker 2: to get off the grid, but these things don't make
Speaker 2: any sense when you put them on the grid. All
Speaker 2: it does is drive the cost of electricity sky high,
Speaker 2: take the reliability to zero. And that is what's happening
Speaker 2: across the country, Texas and everywhere else. We're going to
Speaker 2: take a quick break, and when we come back, I
Speaker 2: want to talk a little bit about what is happening
Speaker 2: on the societal level. We talked about drugs before, we
Speaker 2: talked about how that is really a spiritual issue. Well
Speaker 2: it really is, and we're going to talk about what
Speaker 2: this looks like in other dimensions as well. We'll be
Speaker 2: right back.
Speaker 1: M m.
Speaker 4: H h.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, I want
Speaker 2: to talk about false flags and when we have what
Speaker 2: are the conditions for us to take our arms and
Speaker 2: find our government. That's being talked about a lot now,
Speaker 2: not just a civil war, but actual organized violent resistance
Speaker 2: to the government, and so I want to talk about
Speaker 2: that and tell you what the conservatives are saying here
Speaker 2: as they line up behind Trump or perhaps the civil war.
Speaker 2: Before we leave this energy issue here on rumble marky Mark,
Speaker 2: New Jersey says hydrogen yields less energy than needed to
Speaker 2: make it. It's normally made by splitting H two O
Speaker 2: or CH four water and methane, respectively. This takes more
Speaker 2: energy than it yields. It's also hard to store and
Speaker 2: to transport. I'm not advocating for any of these things.
Speaker 2: What I'm pointing out, however, is the fact, you know,
Speaker 2: we can point out the flaws with all of these things.
Speaker 2: The fundamental flaw, however, that ought to be apparent to everybody,
Speaker 2: is that there is one heavily subsidized alternative. That's the
Speaker 2: point I was trying to make. The point I'm trying
Speaker 2: to make is I don't care what anybody drives. You
Speaker 2: want to drive electric vehicle, if you want to drive
Speaker 2: a steampunk car, I don't care. You know, you want
Speaker 2: to light up some coal and burn some water and
Speaker 2: get this thing moving and go mad Max, It's up
Speaker 2: to you. I'm not here to tell people what cars
Speaker 2: to drive. I'm here to tell people that they don't
Speaker 2: want you to have a car of any kind. That's
Speaker 2: the point. And you can see this is happening when
Speaker 2: they come up with number one, a phony problem, the
Speaker 2: emissions number two. Only one solution is going to be allowed.
Speaker 2: Nobody's allowed to try anything else. Out Right, We're going
Speaker 2: to have one heavily subsidized solution to our phony problem. Folks.
Speaker 2: If that's not a tell teal for mcguffin, that's how
Speaker 2: these things always work. And that's the point I was
Speaker 2: trying to make. Now, let's talk about the election and
Speaker 2: about an armed resistance, false flags and ancient agents provocateurs.
Speaker 2: This is from the New American. They haven't Their entire
Speaker 2: magazine this month is about when a civil war is justified.
Speaker 2: Human history will dispose the prudent man to protect himself,
Speaker 2: his family, his community, his nation, not only against robbers, murderers,
Speaker 2: and thieves and thugs, but also against potential invading armies
Speaker 2: and their spies and fifth columns. Notice what they didn't
Speaker 2: mention your own government. That's not what they mean by
Speaker 2: a fifth column, because they immediately pivot to say this.
Speaker 2: As well as arming ourselves, we also establish sheriffs and
Speaker 2: police departments, militias and military forces, and to provide guidance
Speaker 2: in early threat warning to these protectors, we establish intelligence agencies. Well,
Speaker 2: we used to not have that except the time of war.
Speaker 2: And we used to not have standing armies except in
Speaker 2: times of war. And what this paragraph misses completely is
Speaker 2: when the government itself is your biggest opponent, even as
Speaker 2: they're talking about false flags and agents provocateurs. And then
Speaker 2: to support this, they go back to the Bible and said, well,
Speaker 2: you know in Bible in numbers, Moses sent out the
Speaker 2: twelve spies to look at the land of Canaan. You know,
Speaker 2: go back and scout it out. Tell us what you see, right,
Speaker 2: and most of you know the story. Ten of them
Speaker 2: come back and say it's too difficult. There's giants in
Speaker 2: the land and this and that. It's a land filled
Speaker 2: with abundance, but we can't handle it. Right, two of
Speaker 2: them said we can do it. Let's go. And so
Speaker 2: the people didn't want to do it at katish Barnea.
Speaker 2: And so because of that, God punished them forty years
Speaker 2: in the wilderness and said, nobody in this generation is
Speaker 2: going to see the Promised Land except for Joshua and Caleb,
Speaker 2: who were the two spies who came back and said
Speaker 2: we can do it. Moses was punished by not being
Speaker 2: allowed into the Promised Land as well, what was the problem.
Speaker 2: Was it bad intelligence? No, the problem was that they
Speaker 2: didn't trust God. That's the issue here. That's the issue
Speaker 2: with this issue is that trust God. You see what
Speaker 2: they were saying was we need, first of all, to
Speaker 2: even have intelligence scouts there. We have to. We have
Speaker 2: to do that because we can't trust God to do
Speaker 2: what he's promised to do. So let's check on him.
Speaker 2: Let's do a sanity check on this promise from God. Okay,
Speaker 2: now it doesn't look like he can do that. I
Speaker 2: don't think we need to even try. So they get
Speaker 2: a forty year penalty, They get banned from entering because
Speaker 2: of their faithlessness. Now it's not exactly the same thing.
Speaker 2: But when you look at what our government is doing,
Speaker 2: our government, which is mission right is to protect us,
Speaker 2: and yet it now sees US as its greatest threat threat.
Speaker 2: And that's not just in America, that's in every single country.
Speaker 2: These people have gotten together for so long in their
Speaker 2: globalist confabs, whether it's Bilderberg or Davos or the Club
Speaker 2: of Rome or whatever, they all get together and they
Speaker 2: conspire a by this global government that they want. And
Speaker 2: what's the thing that's in their way it's people who
Speaker 2: are in their own country, So we become the enemy
Speaker 2: and they turn the surveillance systems on us. Well, So
Speaker 2: again continuing with this the New American and one of
Speaker 2: the other articles that they have in this month's magazine,
Speaker 2: when is armed resistance justifying? When is it justifiable for
Speaker 2: a Christian to take up arms against a trannical government? Well,
Speaker 2: should have had this discussion. If we're going to have
Speaker 2: this discussion, should have had this in twenty twenty. I
Speaker 2: said that in twenty twice. Why would you have, you know,
Speaker 2: send everybody to Washington to try to put Trump back
Speaker 2: in when he did nothing to defend us. He turned
Speaker 2: us over to the elected bureaucrats and the pharmaceutical industries
Speaker 2: and special interests. It locked us down. Well, the lesser
Speaker 2: magistrate and nullification are the first thing that you should try.
Speaker 2: So when is armed resistance justified? Well, I'll tell you,
Speaker 2: first of all, you better try those other things. If
Speaker 2: you haven't tried nullification, if you haven't tried the lesser magistrate,
Speaker 2: then you don't have what it takes to overthrow a
Speaker 2: government by force. It's just that simple. If you're going
Speaker 2: to look at that and say that's too difficult. Let's
Speaker 2: just grab some weapons and you know, I'm sure there's
Speaker 2: somebody out there that knows what they're doing, and we'll
Speaker 2: figure this thing out. If you don't have the kind
Speaker 2: of leadership that wants to achieve this with a minimum
Speaker 2: of bloodshed, if you don't have the kind of leadership
Speaker 2: that wants to try to do hard things, if you
Speaker 2: don't have the kind of leadership that wants to follow
Speaker 2: the law and do the right thing, the law is
Speaker 2: on our side when we talk about nullification. I mentioned
Speaker 2: that earlier with the war on drugs, I won't be
Speaker 2: labored anymore. But if you don't have the guts do
Speaker 2: that and have the organizational skills to fight for nullification,
Speaker 2: guess what, you don't have the organizational skills to fight
Speaker 2: a war either, and you need to shut up about that.
Speaker 2: It disgusts me to see all these conservatives out there
Speaker 2: beating the drums for war when they won't lift a finger.
Speaker 2: They won't even pay attention to what's going on locally
Speaker 2: or at the state level. They won't nullify what's happening
Speaker 2: in Washington. They think that they can all get together
Speaker 2: by force somehow and impose some billionaire dictator who's going
Speaker 2: to fix everything for them from Washington. That is a
Speaker 2: disastrous idea. And if we don't learn anything about the selection,
Speaker 2: you need to understand that it's a selection. First of all,
Speaker 2: you're not gonna make any difference in your vote. Number two,
Speaker 2: get over this idolatry. It's just and number three, you're
Speaker 2: not gonna if you haven't done anything at all, you're
Speaker 2: not gonna it's gonna be much tougher with a war.
Speaker 2: If you can't do nullification, if you can't organize people,
Speaker 2: when you've got legitimate arguments to make with this stuff,
Speaker 2: All of this is because of presidential idolatry. It's an
Speaker 2: American idol contest, it's a pageant. It's a fake revolutionist
Speaker 2: Kaitlyn Johnstone Is I said on Friday or Thursday, Caitlyn
Speaker 2: Johnson Is said, the reason that you have these elections
Speaker 2: in the American Empire is not so that you can
Speaker 2: actually change anything. It's basically a cathartic experience, so you
Speaker 2: can feel like you're participating in a revolution. Except now
Speaker 2: this time around, what has changed And she doesn't address this,
Speaker 2: but here's the danger. This time around, you got everybody
Speaker 2: in the mainstream alternative media that is out there saying, well,
Speaker 2: this time, if we don't get what we want, this
Speaker 2: is the last election we're going to have, and we're
Speaker 2: going to have to do this by force. That's stupid.
Speaker 2: You need to look at Matt Trohil's book, The Doctrine
Speaker 2: of the Lesser Magistrate. You can find that at DeFi
Speaker 2: tyrants dot com, d e f y tyrants dot com.
Speaker 2: Go there and take a look at what he says
Speaker 2: can and should be done. And if you're not willing
Speaker 2: to do that, then don't go to Washington for another
Speaker 2: January sixth nonsense. And if you're not willing to do
Speaker 2: something to protect your family again, all these people want
Speaker 2: to talk about, Oh well, you know, let's have another
Speaker 2: American revolutions. Grab your musket, let's go take a look
Speaker 2: at this. The Vermont Department of Health. Department of Health.
Speaker 2: It's not the Department of Education. It's the Department of
Speaker 2: Health telling schools not to use words like son or daughter.
Speaker 2: So what are you gonna do about that? All these
Speaker 2: brave conservative magatards who want to have a shootout, would
Speaker 2: you even take your kids out of school? Oh, that's
Speaker 2: too hard. I can't do that, right. Would you fight
Speaker 2: against the property toes they keep you from ever owning
Speaker 2: property your entire life? Would you fight to defund the
Speaker 2: schools that are doing this to all the kids in
Speaker 2: your community? No, that's too hard. Well let's talk about
Speaker 2: a revolution. Yeah, right, These gas lighting pedophiles who are
Speaker 2: paid by the taxes on your home so that you
Speaker 2: never own anything, and you won't stop that. But you
Speaker 2: want to talk about revolution at the federal level. What
Speaker 2: you know, it's amazing to me to see what's happened
Speaker 2: to the John Versus society and so many conservatives. They've
Speaker 2: completely lost sight of what the issues really are. This
Speaker 2: is your issue. Take care of your kids, take care
Speaker 2: of your family, take care of your community, your state first.
Speaker 2: And the threat is coming from Washington. They're not the solution.
Speaker 2: But if you're not going to fight them at the
Speaker 2: local level on these types of issue shoes, where the
Speaker 2: right is on your side, what is right is on
Speaker 2: your side, you're not going to fight them on the
Speaker 2: other stuff. The language we use matters, says the state agency,
Speaker 2: and it has to be inclusive language. These people schools
Speaker 2: taking your home now, they want to take your kids right.
Speaker 2: They urged school employees. This is the health department in Vermont.
Speaker 2: They urge school employees to use terms like child and
Speaker 2: kid instead of daughter and son. Explaining child and kid
Speaker 2: or gender neutral, they can describe a child who may
Speaker 2: not be someone's legal son or daughter. That's not what
Speaker 2: they're after. It's this gender gas lighting stuff. They've never
Speaker 2: done anything like that before. For context, it's important to
Speaker 2: note this is not the first time the Green Mountain
Speaker 2: State has sought to police the language used in public
Speaker 2: school system. And it's coming from the Health department. It's
Speaker 2: not even coming from the educational department. But the time
Speaker 2: they did this before, it did come from the school district.
Speaker 2: This is the Essex Westford School district in Vermont. Made
Speaker 2: headlines in April of last year when, according to the
Speaker 2: Printal advocacy group, parents defending education, Parents defending education, What
Speaker 2: are they defending? I mean, if you want to defend education,
Speaker 2: shut the schools down. These are nothing but in doctrination camps,
Speaker 2: and they're bankrupting us with their school buses and their
Speaker 2: free education for everybody, including people who are not even
Speaker 2: American citizens. We cannot continue to have a society while
Speaker 2: we're being financially bankrupted by these schools and intellectually bankrupted
Speaker 2: by them, while our children are being pedophile groomed by them.
Speaker 2: Why don't we shut them down? We can't shut down
Speaker 2: the schools. How do you think you're going to shut down?
Speaker 2: Washington Official sent letter home to parents informing the teachers
Speaker 2: will be using gender inclusive language throughout a course on
Speaker 2: puberty and the human reproductive systems. Not about that. It's
Speaker 2: about debauchery, not puberty. Teachers would say, quote person who
Speaker 2: produces sperm instead of boy male, or even a person
Speaker 2: assigned male at birth.
Speaker 1: Even that.
Speaker 2: Is not crazy enough for them. You can't even say, well,
Speaker 2: there's no such thing as male or female. There's things
Speaker 2: that we are assigned at birth. You're assigned that by God.
Speaker 2: It is a physical reality. Or you would have a
Speaker 2: a person who produces sperm, or a person who produces
Speaker 2: eggs rather than girl female, or assigned fee mail at birth.
Speaker 2: I said, we're working on editing worksheets and handouts to
Speaker 2: reflect these changes, but you may see some worksheets that
Speaker 2: have not yet changed. So I apologize if we're still
Speaker 2: using the terms boys and girls or sons and daughters Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: a former teacher gets five years in prison after threatening
Speaker 2: a judge over a ruling that supported parental rights. You
Speaker 2: say it's okay if you threaten children. If you threaten parents,
Speaker 2: you're okay. Just don't threaten the judge or you'll go
Speaker 2: to jail. US District Judge William Jung sentenced Stephen J. Thorn,
Speaker 2: sixty six years old retired teacher to five years in
Speaker 2: federal prison for transmitting a threat to harm a federal
Speaker 2: judge of members of the judge's immediate family. Thorn entered
Speaker 2: a guilty plea and I was given five years. He
Speaker 2: had left the hateful messages for another judge, a woman,
Speaker 2: judge Wendy Berger, who had ruled against the challenge to
Speaker 2: Florida's printal Rights and Education Bill that was signed by
Speaker 2: DeSantis in twenty twenty two. This is the one they said,
Speaker 2: don't say gay, and this person says, I'm gay, and
Speaker 2: I don't like that. And so because this judge ruled
Speaker 2: that the law was okay and could move forward, this
Speaker 2: person blew up in an email to the judge and said,
Speaker 2: let's see how you would like it if somebody endangered
Speaker 2: your children in school or your grandchildren in school. That's
Speaker 2: what he was doing. Actually, you're an embarrassment to the
Speaker 2: judicial system. He said. He looked up the judge and
Speaker 2: her husband and two children lived and said the judge
Speaker 2: was quote very easy to track. I'm a The irony
Speaker 2: is this person was extremely easy to track, as he
Speaker 2: now has a number and a permit location for the
Speaker 2: next five years. He's very easy to locate. I'm a
Speaker 2: retired teacher. I've taught in Florida, I've taught in California.
Speaker 2: I have seen the sheer hell those kids are put through.
Speaker 2: And you have the gall to say that's part of
Speaker 2: middle school or high school to be picked on, he said.
Speaker 2: And this is for the stupid redneck blankety blank judge,
Speaker 2: he said, one message. You are a cruel person. You
Speaker 2: think it's okay for LGBT kids to be bullied, and
Speaker 2: that's what this law is allowing. And that's what it's saying,
Speaker 2: that they're second class citizens. Listen, dummy, you're easy to
Speaker 2: track down five years. As a matter of fact, the
Speaker 2: h the prosecutors sought thirty months in prison, but the
Speaker 2: judge doubled the sentence. However, however, this teacher is retired
Speaker 2: and in California and Florida, this teacher had been grooming
Speaker 2: and abusing kids obviously on a regular basis, you know,
Speaker 2: talking and said, I've spent a large portion of my
Speaker 2: teaching career advocating for LGBT public school students. I am
Speaker 2: also the parent of two adult sons, one of whom
Speaker 2: is gay, he said, the homosexual teacher. So he's been
Speaker 2: doing this a lot of kids. Not a problem. Just
Speaker 2: don't you know, do whatever you want, just and you
Speaker 2: still get a pension. Just don't criticize the judge for
Speaker 2: this stuffor you're going to go to jail. So our
Speaker 2: conservatives getting played by Trump on abortion. Look, folks getting
Speaker 2: played by Trump on everything. Why because they've set themselves
Speaker 2: up to look for a billionaire savior and so he's
Speaker 2: flipped on one side of the issue to the other.
Speaker 2: Lilah Rose has just been you know, savaged on Twitter
Speaker 2: by people like cat Tird and you know other maga
Speaker 2: turds that are out there. But you know this, this
Speaker 2: person is writing this essay on a Christian site that's
Speaker 2: called American Reformer. Got to work, and as they talk
Speaker 2: about this, has said, yeah, look at all the different
Speaker 2: Trump's all over the place. We can't trust him anything. Yeah,
Speaker 2: he's got a personality that we don't want to hold
Speaker 2: that up as an example. Yet, despite the enormity of
Speaker 2: the abortion issue, other things matter as well. In fact,
Speaker 2: they matter more so. To be blunt, well, I just
Speaker 2: have to say that if you don't care about the
Speaker 2: abortion of children, and you don't care about the mass
Speaker 2: abortion of adults, of young people, of elderly people, with
Speaker 2: the shots, with all the red, with the rim des
Speaker 2: of air, with the ventilators, if you don't care about that, Look,
Speaker 2: being pro life is not just being anti abortion. It's
Speaker 2: being anti vaccine and anti war. It's about being actually
Speaker 2: for life. And if you don't care about that, quite frankly,
Speaker 2: they don't care about your view of ethics or christ
Speaker 2: or anything else. You need to go back to the
Speaker 2: drawing board and think a little bit more. Thanks for
Speaker 2: joining us, have a good day the common man. They
Speaker 2: created common Core and dumbed down our children. They created
Speaker 2: common past track and control us. They're Commons project to
Speaker 2: make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
Speaker 2: They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
Speaker 2: each of us has worth and dignity created in the
Speaker 2: image of God. That is what we have in common.
Speaker 2: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 2: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 2: everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 2: time to turn that around and expose what they want
Speaker 2: to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find
Speaker 2: at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
Speaker 2: you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
Speaker 2: keep us in your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com