Speaker 1: Getting ready for work and all day involved and check in
Speaker 1: throughout the day fifty.
Speaker 2: Five krc D Talk Station to shibto five. Here at
Speaker 2: fifty five KRCD Talk Station Epy Friday Eve and Happy
Speaker 2: Halloween to everyone. Hopefully the weather will cooperate, although it
Speaker 2: doesn't look that way. Someone who always cooperates, and someone
Speaker 2: who's filled in a land, which is specifically the district
Speaker 2: eighth District Congressional district here in Ohio, A bunch of
Speaker 2: garbage people in there, humid garbage. According to Joe Biden,
Speaker 2: Welcome back, Warren Davidson, Congressman Davidson, It's always a real
Speaker 2: pleasure to have you on the show.
Speaker 1: Yeah, definitely, my honor. Thanks Brian, nice to talk with you.
Speaker 2: They really flipped around that garbage thing that Joe Biden
Speaker 2: laid on, didn't they.
Speaker 1: President Trump was so good with the garbage truck hopping
Speaker 1: in it and his team put it together. And if
Speaker 1: you watch the monologue where he's just describing to the
Speaker 1: crowd what he did and how it came about, I
Speaker 1: mean it is just how do you not love this guy? Yeah?
Speaker 2: So do why I and a guy had on earlier.
Speaker 2: I just think the world of our in those sons
Speaker 2: that he was out working the garbage truck as well
Speaker 2: the other day. I think that's a good political figure.
Speaker 2: It's like Trump working the McDonald's fries and drive through anyway,
Speaker 2: pivoting over too well, you're can I just really quick
Speaker 2: get your perception, your take. Are you optimistic about Tuesday.
Speaker 2: I'm a little reluctant to express any belief one way
Speaker 2: or another, because you know, I don't want to get
Speaker 2: my bubble burst. But this is just this is the
Speaker 2: most crazy election cycle that I have ever witnessed in
Speaker 2: my fifty nine years on this planet.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Look, I think the momentum is definitely going towards
Speaker 1: the Republicans. I mean, I think like ninety nine to
Speaker 1: one Republicans take the Senate. I think sixty forty, maybe
Speaker 1: two to one, a little better than you know, sixty
Speaker 1: forty that President Trump wins, and frankly, I think he
Speaker 1: will win. The concern I've got is is a lot
Speaker 1: of people. I haven't found anybody that is completely confident
Speaker 1: we're going to have a clean election. There's a lot
Speaker 1: of concern about election integrity issues there. And then the
Speaker 1: thing that really has gotten very little coverage overall is
Speaker 1: the control of the House. The reality is that's probably
Speaker 1: going to be the most competitive. I think only fifty
Speaker 1: two to fifty three percent confident that Republicans stay in
Speaker 1: the majority in the House. I mean, we've got a
Speaker 1: lot of very competitive races around the country.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and that's why it's so important to consider all
Speaker 2: of the candidates when you're voting, not just the presidential candidate,
Speaker 2: go all the way through the down ballot candidates. And
Speaker 2: of course the judicial races are extraordinarily important, and we
Speaker 2: hope to preserve law and order in this country. Let
Speaker 2: us pivot over to one of the most critical issues
Speaker 2: in the election, and of course Biden and Harris literally
Speaker 2: own the open borders that have been around since Joe
Speaker 2: Biden's first day in office, wave of the executive pen
Speaker 2: undoing everything that Trump did to try to secure the border,
Speaker 2: and of course the aftermath, which has been a wave
Speaker 2: of tens I mean fifteen million, maybe twenty million illegal immigrants.
Speaker 2: It's having a profound impact. We started hearing about it first,
Speaker 2: and of course border towns, El Paso, etc. Then it
Speaker 2: kind of crept over to towns in California, Los Angeles,
Speaker 2: San Francisco, New York and Chicago also the recipient of
Speaker 2: tens of thousands of illegal immigrants, but it's also very
Speaker 2: close to home. Lately, Lachlan has been making national news.
Speaker 2: Three thousand plus Mauritanians overwhelming a town of only thirty
Speaker 2: four hundred residents. That's in your congressional district. But you
Speaker 2: used to have Springfield in your congressional district before the
Speaker 2: district's change, so you've got some familiarity with the problem
Speaker 2: in too local towns. Can you talk about that and
Speaker 2: what we need to do to address it?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, look, the federal role is to secure
Speaker 1: the border. I mean, Ohio doesn't have a lot of
Speaker 1: role in securing the border. You're counting on the federal
Speaker 1: government to do their job and do that, and you're
Speaker 1: seeing the consequences of Biden's policies, Harris's policies. They come in,
Speaker 1: they campaigned on changing the policies at the border and
Speaker 1: told them what was going to happen, and they knew
Speaker 1: they were designing him in spite of the implications. They
Speaker 1: did all this because as they wanted to facilitate this
Speaker 1: invasion of our country. And you look at a town
Speaker 1: like Lachlan, not a big city. Es simply double the
Speaker 1: population and they're legals. I mean, in Springfield you've got
Speaker 1: Asians who are you know, people say, yeah, there's a
Speaker 1: real problem in Haiti right now, legitimately refugees safe third country.
Speaker 1: There's a couple other small countries in the Caribbean or
Speaker 1: safe places in the Caribbean to go to. But okay,
Speaker 1: America is nearby, and they've been given temporary protective status
Speaker 1: by the Biden Harris administration, so you can treat them
Speaker 1: as legal. They're refugees. You could debate about whether that
Speaker 1: should be the case for everyone in Haiti and whether
Speaker 1: you should adjudicate all that in America. That's the Springfield issue.
Speaker 1: But look how many safe third countries there are between
Speaker 1: more Attainia and the United States. These people aren't legal
Speaker 1: when they're not even even by the Biden Harris administration,
Speaker 1: which is ridiculously generous on all this stuff. They're not
Speaker 1: given temporary protective status by them. These are illegal immigrants overwhelmingly,
Speaker 1: and they've made their home in Lachlan.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and you know, I appreciate Randy Tucker from the
Speaker 2: Inquire breaking this down. He interviewed one of them in Lockland,
Speaker 2: a West African from Mauritanian. And here's this guy's in
Speaker 2: his family's trip from Mauritanian Africa over to Turkey, then Nicaragua,
Speaker 2: then El Salvador, then guatemal through Mexico where he crossed
Speaker 2: the border on the southern border. How many countries right
Speaker 2: there that they had gone through before that he and
Speaker 2: his family went through before they finally got here. The
Speaker 2: point being under the current law, isn't it still the
Speaker 2: law that if you go through another country that could
Speaker 2: keep you, you have to stay there and we won't
Speaker 2: take you.
Speaker 1: Well, look, that was the remain in Mexico policy that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump had, which is like, if you want to
Speaker 1: claim asylum in America, you wait wherever you're at or
Speaker 1: in a safe third country to claim asylum. You know,
Speaker 1: you don't come to America and get to wait here
Speaker 1: while your claim is adjudicated. And for doing that is
Speaker 1: years long. So they're letting people into the country, no
Speaker 1: easy way to track them, or they'll set a date
Speaker 1: some point in the future and say, oh, yeah, you know,
Speaker 1: come in a you know, a year, and no one
Speaker 1: shows up. Right, Who's shocked by this? So this is
Speaker 1: a huge problem for the country. And this is why
Speaker 1: you know, Donald Trump, Jet Vanser is saying, look, you
Speaker 1: got to get these people out. If you came illegally,
Speaker 1: you got to leave. It's not really debatable.
Speaker 2: And it's got to be a challenge, and this is
Speaker 2: something you're probably going to have to address legislatively. We
Speaker 2: can say we need to crack down and deport folks
Speaker 2: that are here illegally, but they are entitled under our
Speaker 2: loss of this hearing. It's sort of a determination of
Speaker 2: whether they have a legitimate reason. It can't be economic.
Speaker 2: It's got to be some sort of oppression or you know,
Speaker 2: like sort of rigis or religious attacks, something where the
Speaker 2: person has been targeted and is therefore unsafe and fearful
Speaker 2: of their life or something to even have a justification
Speaker 2: to be here. But so many of them admit right
Speaker 2: there on the border, why are you coming here? Well,
Speaker 2: because my country sucks economically. I came here to try
Speaker 2: to get a job that doesn't pass muster and in
Speaker 2: immigration hearing, does it No.
Speaker 1: It doesn't. But trankly they're being coached. I mean, the
Speaker 1: United Nations, numerous nonprofits, they're out there giving information to
Speaker 1: people all over the world. There's YouTube videos that have
Speaker 1: watched millions of times to try to train these people
Speaker 1: on here's the magic phrases that you say that let
Speaker 1: you come in America, sign up for more free stuff
Speaker 1: from the US government. And for some of these people
Speaker 1: that are getting more money from the US government than
Speaker 1: the median income in their country. So of course it's
Speaker 1: a magnet. People are drawn here. They would be drawn
Speaker 1: to America anyway without all that stuff. And even in
Speaker 1: the most generous case and illegal, everybody does everything perfect.
Speaker 1: We set caps for a reason because you don't want
Speaker 1: to overwhelm communities. You look at Springfield, Ohio. You know
Speaker 1: they've got fifty thousand people. They bring in roughly twenty
Speaker 1: thousand new people. Let's say one hundred percent of them
Speaker 1: are there legally, and all of them are legitimate refugees
Speaker 1: that are overwhelmed. And so you have to set rational
Speaker 1: caps because you want people to integrate into a community,
Speaker 1: you want them to integrate into the country. It's e
Speaker 1: plurbusuno them out of many one, not e pluribus plurbus
Speaker 1: out of many many. You know, you want the country
Speaker 1: to become united again, and that's why we have rational caps.
Speaker 2: Well, and it also illustrates even if you don't want
Speaker 2: to have some sort of cap it illustrates the lack
Speaker 2: of sort of planning. You can't just throw thousands of
Speaker 2: people into a community that doubles the size, but the
Speaker 2: resources are not there. They can't be there. The tax
Speaker 2: dollars aren't there, the schools are overwhelmed, the translators aren't
Speaker 2: necessary in order to have children get educated. They're entitled
Speaker 2: under the current law in the state of the United
Speaker 2: States to have access to and get a publicly funded education. Well,
Speaker 2: if you can't you can't teach them in a classroom
Speaker 2: because they don't speak English. Guess what resources get diverted
Speaker 2: over to, you know, English as to be a second
Speaker 2: language class, getting them on board in terms of how
Speaker 2: to speaking absent that, they're never going to learn the
Speaker 2: materials in school. They're going to sit there with their
Speaker 2: eyes with their mouth open, wondering what the hell is
Speaker 2: going on.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I talk with folks in Springfield, and they're being
Speaker 1: told that, look, math is hard enough to teach kids,
Speaker 1: and you've got a certain number of days in school
Speaker 1: because of that, right, And so what they're being told
Speaker 1: though in Springfield is now you have to teach the
Speaker 1: Haitian kids in the same classroom as the American kids,
Speaker 1: or you're a racist. Right. They can't even speak enough
Speaker 1: English to find their way to the bathroom. So what
Speaker 1: they're being told is just use Google Translate, you know,
Speaker 1: say the things that you would normally say to the
Speaker 1: American kids in your class, and then use Google Translate
Speaker 1: to spit out some French creole that may or may
Speaker 1: not be math calibrated, and everyone's going to learn math.
Speaker 1: Of course, it takes away from everyone, not just the
Speaker 1: Haitian kids who are going to find it difficult to learn,
Speaker 1: but the American kids aren't getting the time that they
Speaker 1: need to learn the subject matter. So is a disaster,
Speaker 1: and that's why you have problems. And look, there are
Speaker 1: people that say, well, you just need more money, give
Speaker 1: money to these communities. Well no, let's get rid of
Speaker 1: the people that are there illegally, because otherwise you turn
Speaker 1: every little city in America to just what the Biden
Speaker 1: Harris administration wants is you turn everyone into a sanctuary city.
Speaker 1: Not because places like Lachlan sought that out, but because
Speaker 1: they're forced to cope with this problem. If you just
Speaker 1: send money and instead of removing the people that are
Speaker 1: there illegally, it becomes a de facto sanctuary city.
Speaker 2: Well, and it's another massive expenditure in an already overwhelmed budget,
Speaker 2: just one more line on them on a list that
Speaker 2: has put US trillions and trillions of dollars in debt.
Speaker 2: We're getting we're getting ready to hit a trillion dollars
Speaker 2: in debt service payment, which is just mind boggling. So
Speaker 2: I mean it, it's another expense and factor in everything
Speaker 2: else on top of that that we lack housing, and
Speaker 2: the housing problem is exacerbated just tremendous by this well
Speaker 2: almost immediate inundation. You just can't find room for people.
Speaker 1: Yeah, no, that's right. I mean people was say, oh,
Speaker 1: WI is housing more expensive? Well, it would be more
Speaker 1: expensive because of the inflationary measures that have gone on
Speaker 1: in the country. Thankfully we didn't get the five trillion
Speaker 1: dollar you know bomb of build back better and the
Speaker 1: only one trillion dollar inflation bomb. But if you flood
Speaker 1: the country with more people and you have a set
Speaker 1: rate of growth on housing, it doesn't take a genius
Speaker 1: to figure out that more demand on a same set
Speaker 1: of supply equals higher prices. Right. So that's one of
Speaker 1: the most basic observations in housing.
Speaker 2: And this impacts people across political lines and across races
Speaker 2: and colors. Some people consider this border security policy or
Speaker 2: deportation ideas is racist, but I've heard a lot of people.
Speaker 2: I've seen it online. I've seen meetings, town halls, folks
Speaker 2: in New York City, many black folks standing in a
Speaker 2: room screaming at the already is about how their resources
Speaker 2: are being soaked up by illegal immigrants, how neighborhoods have deteriorated, trash,
Speaker 2: you know, human I just it transcends political affiliation. This
Speaker 2: is a true problem that's hitting every budget across the America.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, look, it is actually part of helping
Speaker 1: Republican momentum, and frankly people that are supporting President Trump
Speaker 1: that don't normally because if you look in communities in
Speaker 1: urban centers that are being flooded with illegal immigration, you know,
Speaker 1: lower wage folks for people that do want to work,
Speaker 1: Like originally the Haitian immigrants came into Springfield because they
Speaker 1: were willing to work. Well, they're driving down wages because
Speaker 1: you've got a new supply of people that are willing
Speaker 1: to work for low wages, and that hurts the community.
Speaker 1: You've got people that to the extent that there are
Speaker 1: people there that do want to be working in those wages.
Speaker 1: It drives the wage down. How holds wage growth down.
Speaker 1: And you need real income, the amount after inflation that
Speaker 1: you take home. You've got to have the take home
Speaker 1: pay to go up to deal with the cost of living.
Speaker 1: If everyone's dealing with that, you know, things cost a
Speaker 1: lot more. Even if the rate of increase is slowing down,
Speaker 1: the prices are going lower, they're still very high and
Speaker 1: wages haven't gone up enough to keep up with that.
Speaker 1: And part of that is you're flooding the market with
Speaker 1: all this extra labor.
Speaker 2: Let's pause real quick. I'll bring it back for another
Speaker 2: minute or two because I know you're you have very
Speaker 2: profound and strong opinions on the FED and crypto assets.
Speaker 2: We'll do a couple more minutes with Congressman Warren Davidson.
Speaker 2: Real quick word for my friends at Foreign Exchange, though
Speaker 2: Austin and the team at Foreign Exchange Westchester location are
Speaker 2: waiting to service your imported car traditional import manufacturers. You
Speaker 2: got it from BMW's and Porsches and Mercedes over to
Speaker 2: anything manufactured in Asian company our country also Volvos. You
Speaker 2: know everything if it's imported or traditionally imported. They got
Speaker 2: data access to your manufacturers technical information, do software updates
Speaker 2: and programming. They also now serve as Tesla. Their team
Speaker 2: has been trained to service Tesla's that's the EV manufacturer
Speaker 2: they're working on, and of course they're going to expand
Speaker 2: that down the road. But that's a brand new development
Speaker 2: for Foreign Exchange. So take the car in there. Why
Speaker 2: there versus the dealer money? Save a heapload of money.
Speaker 2: They don't charge nearly as much as the dealer to
Speaker 2: service your car and they are outstanding of what they do.
Speaker 2: Team at Foreign Exchange West Gester. You can find them
Speaker 2: by going seventy five south or north. Just take the
Speaker 2: Tylersville exit and go east just two short streets. Hangar
Speaker 2: right on Kingland Drive online find them at Foreign xformthletterax
Speaker 2: dot com to call that Westchester location. Please tell them
Speaker 2: I said hi at five one three six four four
Speaker 2: twenty six twenty six fifty five KRC.
Speaker 1: Hello, I'm Victor Gray and I'm Colin Hurst.
Speaker 2: We want to invite you to listen to Victor Gray
Speaker 2: Financial Services, Money and retirement show help them a twenty
Speaker 2: three fifty five KRCD talk station. Brintomas here with Congress
Speaker 2: and Warren Davidson. This is a couple of brief moments
Speaker 2: to talk about the idea of the FED and also
Speaker 2: crypto assets. The whole idea of cryptocurrency is just baffling
Speaker 2: to me. Ones and Zeros use this currency. It's all electronic.
Speaker 2: I understand blockchain enough to know that it's really good security.
Speaker 2: But where are you on this, Congressman Davidson.
Speaker 1: Well, look, central bank digital currency. The idea that the
Speaker 1: federal government would do it is not blockchain. It's not
Speaker 1: a distributed ledger. It's just a centrally managed database managed
Speaker 1: by the government. And this is an idea. Look, the
Speaker 1: Federal Reserve is building this out right now this fall here,
Speaker 1: I got to travel to Europe to talk to the
Speaker 1: European central bankers in London, in Brussels, and in Basel, Switzerland.
Speaker 1: That's the Switzerland's basically the central bank. For the other
Speaker 1: central bankers, they move all their money through there. They're
Speaker 1: all working on the same thing. They want to basically
Speaker 1: take over the money supply so that the central bank
Speaker 1: is the issuer of the currency, and this has huge
Speaker 1: implications for our small community banks that would take the
Speaker 1: deposits off of their books and put them on the
Speaker 1: direct direct accounts with the FED, and it really could
Speaker 1: be filtered controlled. They call it programmable money. They act
Speaker 1: like that's a feature. I haven't found constituents that want this.
Speaker 1: But in Congress when we voted on banning central bank
Speaker 1: digital currency, we only had two Democrats oppose it say yeah,
Speaker 1: we want to ban it. The rest of Democrats say no,
Speaker 1: we're for it. And when I was meeting with the
Speaker 1: regulators and it was Republicans z AM Democrats that made
Speaker 1: the trip, the Democrats are like, yeah, we love the
Speaker 1: globalist bankers. We want to be just like the Europeans.
Speaker 1: We want to do things that are great for the
Speaker 1: European Union in bed for America and the strength of
Speaker 1: the US dollars. So I think it's a disastrous idea.
Speaker 1: On the other hand, you look at Bitcoin. It's the
Speaker 1: sixteenth anniversary of the launch of the Bitcoin white Paper.
Speaker 1: I just posted a tweet on at Warren Davidson about it,
Speaker 1: and you could read the white paper. This is the
Speaker 1: whole idea is it's a different way of establishing trust
Speaker 1: than a central database. Very secure value of one coins
Speaker 1: about seventy two thousand dollars today, and you know I
Speaker 1: took office in twenty sixteen was less than a thousand.
Speaker 1: So I've been talking about, Hey, this is a difference.
Speaker 1: Is a smart thing to do? You think seventy two
Speaker 1: x since I just came into Congress, would say maybe
Speaker 1: somebody would start to pay attention to this. But we
Speaker 1: still have people trying to block private self custody of
Speaker 1: digital assets, and you still have people forcing that they
Speaker 1: want total control over your money. And that is the
Speaker 1: contrast freedom versus tyranny.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and I suspect that it built into that component
Speaker 2: of the Federal Garment's cryptocurrency is that they'd probably be
Speaker 2: able to know what we spend our money on and
Speaker 2: where it is and everything about us. So it seems
Speaker 2: to me probably a privacy invasion component.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Look, I mean right now, your bank spies on you.
Speaker 1: That's not unique to America. Everywhere in the world. If
Speaker 1: your banks don't spy on their customers, they don't get
Speaker 1: a e banks. But that's a third party, and in
Speaker 1: the United States, they're at least supposed to go through
Speaker 1: the effort to get a warrant or a subpoena if
Speaker 1: they want your specific information. We found numerous cases where
Speaker 1: that's not the case. That's the concern, but you still
Speaker 1: have cash. It's not completely illegal. Central marting digital currency
Speaker 1: would be every single thing that you spend money on.
Speaker 1: The central authority would know who spent what money and
Speaker 1: with whom exactly every transaction. They would know all the
Speaker 1: details on right now. You know, they might know you
Speaker 1: spent one hundred dollars at Walmart, but they don't know
Speaker 1: what you bought at Walmart without extra trouble. They have
Speaker 1: to go to Walmart to find that out. And that's
Speaker 1: a feature to some of the people. They say, well
Speaker 1: we could know more details. You can just get it
Speaker 1: all in the database, just to keep you safe, you know,
Speaker 1: like the Patriot Act.
Speaker 2: Yeah, right, Congress and Warren Davidson, a solid man with
Speaker 2: a solid lock on his job, doing a great job
Speaker 2: for the eighth District and for all Americans. Keep up
Speaker 2: the great work, my friend. Hopefully next time we talk,
Speaker 2: we'll be talking about some really positive good news in
Speaker 2: terms of the direction of the federal government.
Speaker 1: Yeah. From your mouth to God's ears, you know, God
Speaker 1: never needs a majority, rarely uses one, but we need
Speaker 1: one in the House to senate the State Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: We need to know on issue one and we got
Speaker 1: to flip the House. We need guys like Orlando Signsa
Speaker 1: to win.
Speaker 2: Amen to that. Thank you for your time today and
Speaker 2: we'll keep our fingers crossed for Tuesday. It's a sure thing. Anytime.
Speaker 2: My friend Jay Ratliffe up next day right here, if
Speaker 2: if you have Karcit talk station,