Speaker 1: Good evening and welcome to another edition of The Cajun
Speaker 1: Night Live. I am your host, the Cajun Knight, Jacob Mook.
Speaker 1: We've got a lot of things to talk about this episode. Yes,
Speaker 1: we are gonna be briefly talking about the Epstein situation.
Speaker 1: But you know, the culture Conspiracies are running so many
Speaker 1: different episodes about that and are gonna continue to do
Speaker 1: so that on this episode it will get brought up briefly,
Speaker 1: mostly because I feel like we can't dunk on Pam
Speaker 1: Bondi enough right now. I'm super here for it. She is,
Speaker 1: We'll get to it. We'll get to it. She is
Speaker 1: not impressing me by any margin, which for the record,
Speaker 1: she never really did impress me. I thought maybe she
Speaker 1: was gonna be adequate at the job. Boy, she does
Speaker 1: not do well when backed into a corner, and it's
Speaker 1: it's embarrassing to say the least. But anyway, we're not
Speaker 1: gonna get there just yet, good members of the retinue,
Speaker 1: we are gonna get there here in a moment. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna go ahead and share the screen at this time
Speaker 1: and for anybody who is like to be a part
Speaker 1: of this conversation. Every Wednesday night a nine pm Central.
Speaker 1: What you need to do is go to the link
Speaker 1: in the description below to patreon dot com slash cajun Knight.
Speaker 1: There is only one tier for entry to the retinue.
Speaker 1: We are just trying to grow this into being its
Speaker 1: own information sharing group that gets together every Wednesday night
Speaker 1: at nine pm Central and has a good time discussing
Speaker 1: the goings and comings of our day and day lives.
Speaker 1: Sometimes it's a religious base, sometimes a historical base, sometimes
Speaker 1: it's geopolitical base, and sometimes it's just all out whatever
Speaker 1: comes to mind. We're gonna start off with this one
Speaker 1: from tasking purpose. Anybody who has ever served in the
Speaker 1: military will have a clincher moment when I read this.
Speaker 1: Your your butthole will pooker right? National Guardmen, guardsman whatever.
Speaker 1: Who left M four at New Orleans hotel to undergo retraining? Done? Done? Yes,
Speaker 1: this dude who is in New Orleans for some sort
Speaker 1: of a training mission or whatever the case, he left
Speaker 1: his M four in a hotel restroom, not even for
Speaker 1: five minutes, like left gone on accounted for gear drift
Speaker 1: and you know now he is slated to go through
Speaker 1: some retraining. I'm hoping just me being me I as
Speaker 1: the Cajun item, hoping that this retraining will be more
Speaker 1: of a overt hazing him, hazing of his entire body
Speaker 1: to the point to where he wishes he was dead.
Speaker 1: That is just what Jacob wishes for this young man.
Speaker 1: Guardsman I don't know, might be a woman, might be
Speaker 1: a them day, I don't know, but yes, I hope
Speaker 1: that they get the retraining that they need. Let's read
Speaker 1: about it together. Here. There's a particular kind of panic,
Speaker 1: a heart stopping, cold, sweat inducing fear followed by endless
Speaker 1: barrage of exploitives, explotives, cuss words, if you will, that
Speaker 1: occur when someone realizes they've misplaced their rifle. Originally, for
Speaker 1: one Louisiana CoA guardsman, it's a sensation he now knows
Speaker 1: all too well, after leaving their IN four inside the
Speaker 1: bathroom of a New Orleans hotel on Sunday. Thankfully, the
Speaker 1: weapon is no longer missing, the Louisiana National Guard spokeswoman
Speaker 1: told Task and Purpose on Tuesday. Quote the rifle was
Speaker 1: returned to the Louisiana National Guard, said Lieutenant Colonel Noel Collins.
Speaker 1: The soldier and the incident are being handled internally. As well.
Speaker 1: They should as well. They should, And to be honest,
Speaker 1: I don't really want to know what the dude's name is. Soldier.
Speaker 1: Excuse me, guardsmen. I'm not trying to blast them all
Speaker 1: over and ruin their life. I'm sure that his sergeant
Speaker 1: is making good use of his time right now. But uh,
Speaker 1: you know, yeah, it's handled internally as well it should be.
Speaker 1: The soldier has been temporarily removed from his duties and
Speaker 1: is undergoing quote unquote retraining. While a review into the
Speaker 1: incident is pending. Colin said no further information was immediately
Speaker 1: available about how the weapon was left in the bathroom.
Speaker 1: She said the M four was found in a Lafitte
Speaker 1: hotel on Bourbon Streets. The hotel and bar are located
Speaker 1: in the French Quarter, a busy popular destination in New
Speaker 1: Orleans for tourists and locals. So for those that don't know,
Speaker 1: this is Mardi Gras season. There's parades going off right now,
Speaker 1: especially on the weekends, so apparently Sunday, and if I'm
Speaker 1: not mistaken, the Lafitte Hotel is at the corner of
Speaker 1: Bourbon and Canal. I think it's been a minute since
Speaker 1: a state of any real hotel in New Orleans. But anyway,
Speaker 1: it's on Bourbon Street, y'all. This is not a spot
Speaker 1: where you want to leave your militarily issued weapons. But
Speaker 1: he did, and thankfully some good Samaritans and possibly hotel
Speaker 1: staff found it and returned it to the National Guard.
Speaker 1: So this is it, just right there, right right next
Speaker 1: to the pissar. Just uh not to mention, muzzle down,
Speaker 1: muzzle fucking down, dog, What is this? See? This is
Speaker 1: how you can tell it's a guardsman. No, no fucking
Speaker 1: common sense whatsoever on that one. News of the incident
Speaker 1: ricochet around social media after a picture of the M
Speaker 1: four propped up against the bathroom while next to the
Speaker 1: toilet was posted to the New Orleans subreddit. Oh man,
Speaker 1: that's great. From there, the story spread across military subreddits.
Speaker 1: Oh yes, oh yes, the police are now involved. But
Speaker 1: I waited for a National Guard guy to use the bathroom,
Speaker 1: and then after I entered, I found the assault rifle. Okay,
Speaker 1: it's it's not an assault rifle, it's an M four. Erebody,
Speaker 1: calm down here, a reddit user wrote as part of
Speaker 1: the original post. Police arrived at the scene after the
Speaker 1: INN four was discovered in the bathroom, The New Orleans
Speaker 1: Police Department directed all questions to the Louisiana National Guard.
Speaker 1: About three hundred and fifty Louisiana National Guard troops are
Speaker 1: deployed the New Orleans, having mobilized in early December under
Speaker 1: Federal Title thirty two status ahead of New Year celebrations.
Speaker 1: The authorization runs through the end of February and was
Speaker 1: meant to cover major events, including the Sugar Bowl and
Speaker 1: Monte Grol. The troops were mobilized to enhance capabilities, stabilize
Speaker 1: the environment, assistant that reducing crime, and restore public trust.
Speaker 1: Louisiana Guard wrote December twenty third news release, Losing a
Speaker 1: weapon is a cardinal sin within the military, and it's
Speaker 1: often accur severe punishment. The commander and sergeant major of
Speaker 1: the third Buttie six Marines were both fired in March
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty after two of the unit's rifles went
Speaker 1: missing the previous December in a training area at Camp Lajune,
Speaker 1: North Carolina.
Speaker 2: Yo.
Speaker 1: I remember this. Oh my god. They shut down the
Speaker 1: East coast, and I don't mean for the civilian world.
Speaker 1: Two rifles two and fours went missing at Camp Lajune,
Speaker 1: North Carolina and good old Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, jay Actionville,
Speaker 1: North Carolina. Okay, it's it's not a good place to
Speaker 1: be stationed. Just don't throw that out. It's not the worst,
Speaker 1: it's just not the best. Three six went out on
Speaker 1: a training op, came back two rifles shy, and they
Speaker 1: shut down every single Marine Corps installation from DC all
Speaker 1: the way down to Savannah, Georgia. Why, you may ask,
Speaker 1: because where rifle it went, it went way, way out
Speaker 1: of proportion. To my knowledge, they still have never been found.
Speaker 1: So A it's possible that these dudes, Uh, maybe the
Speaker 1: two guys that lost them were shit bags and their
Speaker 1: boys were trying to fuck with them and buried them
Speaker 1: out there and wanted to get them kicked out. Instead
Speaker 1: they got the commander and the sergeant major kicked out.
Speaker 1: I don't know, but it's uh, it's a thing. It
Speaker 1: is a thing that happened, and in twenty twenty was
Speaker 1: a weird time, this M four situation in New Orleans. Thankfully,
Speaker 1: it's been recovered. Nobody got hurt, Everybody is fine, and
Speaker 1: I know there's gonna be people that are gonna say, well,
Speaker 1: how do they know somebody didn't just go in that
Speaker 1: bathroom and come out and start spraying people in forest
Speaker 1: like there's an assault rifle. Like the Reddit post said, listen,
Speaker 1: I'm not trying to be that guy, but I will
Speaker 1: say that in twenty twenty, more people died from inserting
Speaker 1: shit into their butts than died from AR style weapons
Speaker 1: in America. That's a real statistic, by the way, if
Speaker 1: you want to look that up to like two or
Speaker 1: three times the amount people died by putting things in
Speaker 1: their butt that don't belong there versus people that died
Speaker 1: from AR deaths. Twenty twenty was a weird time. I
Speaker 1: think we can all acknowledge that. But beside the point,
Speaker 1: ars are not scary. They're not an assault rifle. AR
Speaker 1: stands for Armaalite, which is the company that manufactured the
Speaker 1: original model and the original design, so it is not
Speaker 1: assault rifle. Whatever. Just we're on the same page. But
Speaker 1: I thought this would be a fun one to start with,
Speaker 1: and to all my veteran homies out there, you can
Speaker 1: relax the sphincter. Everything is good, no harm, no foul.
Speaker 1: I suppose now they want to bring this up next.
Speaker 1: This comes from the l Paso Times. As we're still
Speaker 1: talking about military things and American news as a whole.
Speaker 1: I thought this would be an interesting one. The Pentagon
Speaker 1: disabled cartel drones before the FAA closed El Paso Airspace.
Speaker 1: Now I got sent a couple of different messages about this,
Speaker 1: some on the patreons, some of the socials, all the things,
Speaker 1: apparently the federal government, and of course it was the
Speaker 1: FA and all these things. But they kept saying the
Speaker 1: fed federal government shut down the airspace over El Paso, Texas.
Speaker 1: And a lot of people were asking what would be
Speaker 1: so serious that it would cause them to shut down
Speaker 1: the airspace. And I'm gonna be honest, my conspiratorial brain
Speaker 1: initially thought possibly UFO. I don't know, I don't know.
Speaker 1: I just, without doing any research into the topic, without
Speaker 1: looking into the news whatsoever, knee jerk reaction thought maybe
Speaker 1: it was a UFO situation, that's why they shut down
Speaker 1: the airspace. Fine, And for the record, I am not
Speaker 1: convinced that it wasn't, but I'm leaning more heavily towards no,
Speaker 1: it probably wasn't a UFO, but it could be. There
Speaker 1: is a greater than zero percent chance. That's all I'm
Speaker 1: saying on that. But anyway, moving forward. Apparently the cartel
Speaker 1: and there's two different stories that are going out right now.
Speaker 1: That's why before I read this article, depending on the
Speaker 1: source that you read, you're gonna get two different stories,
Speaker 1: both from quote unquote credible sources. One of them says
Speaker 1: that the cartels, which right now, there is a war
Speaker 1: going on between the Cineloa cartel and the Mexican government.
Speaker 1: Allegedly the war has been raging for about a year
Speaker 1: and a half now, but as of time of recording,
Speaker 1: earlier today there was a massive gunfight that broke out.
Speaker 1: There was helicopters with mounted fifty cows on them that
Speaker 1: were lighting up some sort of a Sinaloa ground based operation.
Speaker 1: There was eight case firing back at them. It's fine.
Speaker 1: My point is the war has been going on for
Speaker 1: a while, but apparently things just like they're starting to
Speaker 1: get more intense between the Cineloa and the Mexican government.
Speaker 1: I don't know, but there is currently a hypothetical situation
Speaker 1: in which the Cineloa cartel sent some sort of a
Speaker 1: drone over the US border above El Paso, and the
Speaker 1: American military was sent out to disable it. The other
Speaker 1: possibility is that American military air assets were flying some
Speaker 1: sort of a new experimental prototype and they something went
Speaker 1: wrong and they needed to shut down the airspace that
Speaker 1: they could handle whatever the situation was. I don't know
Speaker 1: if that means they had to shoot down the plane
Speaker 1: had a malfunction, they had to ditch and it crashed,
Speaker 1: And I don't know. Like I said, there's a couple
Speaker 1: of different possibilities on this. The most likely, or at
Speaker 1: least what most news sources are saying. And yes, I
Speaker 1: understand it's mainstream media and you have to take that
Speaker 1: with a grain of salt. I get that. But most
Speaker 1: people in the news world are saying that, yes, it
Speaker 1: was a drone sent by the cartels and that American
Speaker 1: air assets had to take it down. Now that being said,
Speaker 1: there is a caveat. Within this caveat, some are saying
Speaker 1: that they shot it down with energy weapons. Apparently they
Speaker 1: shut down all of the airspace in El Paso and
Speaker 1: they sent what I can only describe as a death
Speaker 1: ray in the sky to fry the circuitry of the
Speaker 1: drone and collect it. I've heard some people say pulse energy.
Speaker 1: I heard some people say it was like a directed emp.
Speaker 1: I heard some people say, no, dude, it was just
Speaker 1: a helicopter and they just shot it down. I don't know,
Speaker 1: but there's a lot of speculation on this one, so
Speaker 1: I figured it'd be worth our time to really talk
Speaker 1: about here. So a temporary flight restriction has now been lifted.
Speaker 1: This was reported five fifteen, five nineteen pm this evening
Speaker 1: as of time recording, so just a few hours ago.
Speaker 1: Temporary flight restriction has now been lifted after the Federal
Speaker 1: Aviation Administration FAA announced it would be halting all flights
Speaker 1: to and from El Paso and the neighboring Santa Santa Teresa,
Speaker 1: New Mexico for the next ten days. So whatever this
Speaker 1: was they were claiming that they were going to shut
Speaker 1: down all air space, all air travel for this area
Speaker 1: for ten days, it was only a few hours. It was.
Speaker 1: It was only a few hours. So whatever it was
Speaker 1: got handled relatively quickly, so I mean that's a good thing.
Speaker 1: The restriction prohibited all aircraft operations, including commercial cargo and
Speaker 1: general aviation flights, from eleven thirty pm February tenth through
Speaker 1: eleven February twentieth. The restriction was issued for special security reasons,
Speaker 1: quote unquote, according to the FAA notice and a move
Speaker 1: that is rare for an airport in a major US city,
Speaker 1: which that is true. County judge was not informed of
Speaker 1: airspace closures, so al Paso County Judge Ricardo WHOA yeah,
Speaker 1: that's that is a Latin based name. Semon Diego Carmen
Speaker 1: san Diego sure said in a Facebook post Wednesday evening
Speaker 1: that he was not informed of the FAA's decision to
Speaker 1: close El Paso airspace and would as soon as more
Speaker 1: information becomes available. Timely updates will be provided to keep
Speaker 1: everyone informed as the head of the Emergency management for
Speaker 1: El Paso County pursue it to Chapter four eighteen Section
Speaker 1: four eighteen point one zero one five of the Texas
Speaker 1: Government Code. Jesus christ I was not informed of today's
Speaker 1: FAA decision to close the airspace isadel Passo air National Airport,
Speaker 1: San Diego wrote. The absence of prior communication contributed to
Speaker 1: significant concern and confusion within the community, as such actions
Speaker 1: have direct implications for public awareness, safety coordination, and local
Speaker 1: emergency management response efforts. God this judge loves hearing himself
Speaker 1: talk Lord of Mercy. Okay. Audio captures pilot's reaction to
Speaker 1: closer air closure rather air traffic control. Audio via liveatc
Speaker 1: dot net captured the conversation between a Southwest pilot and
Speaker 1: air traffic control as the closure was announced. So for
Speaker 1: ten days, you guys are not open, the pilot asked again. Well,
Speaker 1: maybe we'll be here, but no air traffic. The air
Speaker 1: traffic controller responded, so now the Santa Theresa Jetport open.
Speaker 1: The Donna Anna County International Jetport in the Santa Theresa,
Speaker 1: New Mexico in the Santa Theresa, New Mexico Oka area
Speaker 1: was never closed by an FAA order that closed the
Speaker 1: airspace overnight at the Lpasso International Airport, said Jody Young,
Speaker 1: jetport manager. The closed airspace map posted by the FAA
Speaker 1: shows the closed airspace in Santa Teresa is about seven
Speaker 1: miles west of my airport. Some airspace is closed, but
Speaker 1: it's not over my airport, Young said, Okay, so it
Speaker 1: was I guess maybe a certain approach vector for the
Speaker 1: aircraft was closed down, but like the airport itself was
Speaker 1: still good. I don't know. Anyway, we are not closed.
Speaker 1: A plane just took off, Young said, shortly before ten am,
Speaker 1: So anyway, let's talk about this. A threat has been neutralized,
Speaker 1: says Transportation Secretary. So what was it? What was this
Speaker 1: threat that had them say we're gonna shut down this
Speaker 1: airspace for ten days without any prior warning, nothing else.
Speaker 1: Let's get into it here. US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy
Speaker 1: said in an expost, which again, I cannot express how
Speaker 1: much it pisses me off that our officials are releasing
Speaker 1: statements to the public via social media. I can't take
Speaker 1: that seriously. I'm you know, I know that this is
Speaker 1: the day and age we live in, and everybody is
Speaker 1: on some sort of social media. I get that, But
Speaker 1: if it's an official statement that is being told to
Speaker 1: the public, I don't know, man, I don't know anyway.
Speaker 1: Maybe I'm just maybe I'm just showing my boomer ass
Speaker 1: self or zoomeror whate the fuck they call my age
Speaker 1: back at these days. I don't know anyone. He said
Speaker 1: in an expost that the FAA and the Department of
Speaker 1: War acted swiftly to address a cartel drone incursion. The
Speaker 1: threat has been neutralized and there is no danger to
Speaker 1: commercial travel in the region. He said, that's basically what
Speaker 1: this post says verbatim. Here. Senator Ted Cruz, working with
Speaker 1: federal authorities He said he is looking into the incident
Speaker 1: and is hoping to release more information as it becomes available.
Speaker 1: My team has been working with the FAA, the DOW,
Speaker 1: Department of War, and others to gather more information about
Speaker 1: this morning's temporary airspace closure in El Paso. I'm hopeful
Speaker 1: more details can be publicly shared in the coming days
Speaker 1: into on integracy. Jesus, I can't speak right now on
Speaker 1: interagency coordination. There we go. We got it out here. Anyway,
Speaker 1: long story short, everybody's saying that, yes, it's over now.
Speaker 1: Whatever took place was good to go. The airspace remains
Speaker 1: closed over Santa Teresa, New Mexico, even though again this
Speaker 1: is Santa Teresa and the airspace closure really wasn't a
Speaker 1: part of that. So whatever. The DPS debunks rumors of
Speaker 1: road closure. Okay, so the Apartment of Public Safety is
Speaker 1: saying that the road closures were never a threat. It
Speaker 1: was only supposed to be air traffic. Let's see here,
Speaker 1: city officials are not been told why the airspace closed.
Speaker 1: So even still as of a few hours ago, as
Speaker 1: of time recording, nobody at the top really well, I say,
Speaker 1: at the top, somebody knows why they close the airspace,
Speaker 1: but as far as the local officials in and around
Speaker 1: El Paso, or even the county officials, no one has
Speaker 1: any idea. That's why I'm saying there is a greater
Speaker 1: than zero percent chance that it was something of an
Speaker 1: alien origin. It was probably more than likely a Cartel
Speaker 1: drone or something. I don't know, but it's you know.
Speaker 1: And then also being said, it's also possible that this
Speaker 1: was some sort of a new advanced military air tech
Speaker 1: that they're trying to work on and something went wrong
Speaker 1: and it's gone now and it's whatever, and they just said, oh,
Speaker 1: you know, it's a training exercise. You know. Maybe maybe
Speaker 1: this is their version a new way of saying, oh,
Speaker 1: a pilot went down in a training exercise, but he's
Speaker 1: all good. I don't know. I don't know, but it's
Speaker 1: rare that things like this take place, and I thought
Speaker 1: it was fun to bring up, you know. Anyway, El
Speaker 1: Paso's mayor Johnson said that this has not occurred since
Speaker 1: nine eleven, So apparently the FAA has not had flight
Speaker 1: restrictions in and around this area since September eleventh of one,
Speaker 1: which is crazy. Trump appears to have not made comment
Speaker 1: on El Paso flight restrictions. Yeah, he's kind of got
Speaker 1: his hands busy right now, so I don't think that
Speaker 1: he's really that concerned with it. But anyway, like I'm saying, y'all,
Speaker 1: I didn't want to spend too much, crazy amount of
Speaker 1: time on this, but I had multiple people reach out
Speaker 1: to me today to ask what I thought about the closure.
Speaker 1: So you know what, let's see if we could play
Speaker 1: this clip, maybe to'll load a little bit better for us.
Speaker 1: They'll give us the rundown.
Speaker 3: Flight's resumed this morning at the El Paso International Airport,
Speaker 3: which was closed overnight by the FAA. Some travelers this
Speaker 3: morning found out overnight at three point thirty in the
Speaker 3: morning as they were preparing for their dawn flight. Others
Speaker 3: found out just a few minutes before they were supposed
Speaker 3: to travel to the airport. A Trump A Minute official,
Speaker 3: speaking on condition of anonymity to USA Today, said the
Speaker 3: airspace was closed to combat Mexican cartel drones. Democrat Congresswoman
Speaker 3: Veronica Ascobar, who represents Alpasso, called the administration's version of
Speaker 3: events into question, saying the FAA or administration officials did
Speaker 3: not notify the local government and that her understanding is
Speaker 3: that there was no threat. Gate agents are working to
Speaker 3: rebook people on flights A travelers say they're hopeful they
Speaker 3: will be able to fly out today.
Speaker 1: Okay, so there we have it. Oh no, maybe more
Speaker 1: the information will come out over the next few days.
Speaker 1: We can only hope. So moving onward, We're going to
Speaker 1: step away from America for a moment here because you know,
Speaker 1: there is a lot of ship bags around this earth.
Speaker 1: That is a fact, and apparently Australia has their own
Speaker 1: version of them. As more things about the Epstein files
Speaker 1: are coming out right as we are learning that more
Speaker 1: and more people were involved with this, I feel like
Speaker 1: not enough people understand that satanic pedophile rings are globally
Speaker 1: everywhere everywhere. Right. We've talked about on the Culture Conspiracy.
Speaker 1: We've talked about the Order of Nine Angles. Multiple members
Speaker 1: of them are in jail right now for ritualistically sacrificing
Speaker 1: and raping people. We've talked about the ring in what
Speaker 1: was it, New Mexico. If I'm not mistaken, this dude
Speaker 1: that worked at a bank, he was like a regional
Speaker 1: manager of a bank, and come to find out he
Speaker 1: was also part of a satanic pedophile ring. We think
Speaker 1: of these as more off the beaten path types of things.
Speaker 1: This is happening everywhere, and I'm not saying this to
Speaker 1: blackpill anybody. I'm saying it because it's real. A Sydney
Speaker 1: property manager with alleged ties quote unquote alleged to satanic
Speaker 1: pedophile ring was the bail. This is the seventh person
Speaker 1: to be arrested involved with this specific pedophile ring in Australia,
Speaker 1: and I thought it was worth talking about, especially in
Speaker 1: light of what all is going on in America as
Speaker 1: of this moment, because we do know that although the
Speaker 1: Epstein situation happened on technically US soil, he had global reach.
Speaker 1: So let's get into it here. A Sydney property manager,
Speaker 1: an alleged member of a satanic child sex abuse material ring,
Speaker 1: has been denied bail after extremely graphic, violent, depraved material
Speaker 1: was allegedly found on his devices. A court has heard
Speaker 1: Colin Milni Miln, I don't know is the sixth, I
Speaker 1: said seventh? Excuse me? The sixth person to be charged
Speaker 1: after a prob allegedly uncovered a Sydney based pedophile network
Speaker 1: involved in possessing, facilitating and distributing ritualistic or satanic themed
Speaker 1: child sexual abuse material through an international website. Sex Crime
Speaker 1: Squad detectives on Tuesday morning searched a proper in Walara, Walajara,
Speaker 1: I only speak American English. I'm sorry, in Sydney's Eastern suburbs,
Speaker 1: where they arrested mister Milanie and seize electronic devices. Facing
Speaker 1: court on Wednesday, the sixty two year old was refused
Speaker 1: bailed by Magistrate Alison Viney Good, who described the content
Speaker 1: of the material found by police as concerning and horrific. Well, yeah,
Speaker 1: you would think so. In somewhat nearly twenty years of
Speaker 1: sitting as a judicial officer, I haven't read many worse
Speaker 1: than this, That's what the magistrate said. Violent and depraved material.
Speaker 1: Commonwealth Prosecutor Ania Dutka told the court that she the
Speaker 1: charges against mister Milanie related to at least fifty individual
Speaker 1: images and ten videos, including the abuse of infants, babies
Speaker 1: and children. The alleged facts revealed the extremely graphic, violent
Speaker 1: and depraved nature of child sex abuse materials found on
Speaker 1: the accused devices. Investigators have also found a large volume
Speaker 1: of material in relation to the physical and sexual abuse
Speaker 1: of animals. Because I'll bet they did, The court heard
Speaker 1: police yeah, the court heard police will allege members of
Speaker 1: the network or yeah, that's weird verbiage, but maybe that's
Speaker 1: just how Australians speak. I don't know. Members of the
Speaker 1: network also discussed their particular preference of videos amongst each other.
Speaker 1: Mister Ducca also told the court there were grave concerns
Speaker 1: mister Milner, who lives in Wallara, would contact other members
Speaker 1: of the network to help them avoid detection if he
Speaker 1: was granted belt. Well, yeah, obviously I feel like I
Speaker 1: went without saying, but all right. During the hearing, mister
Speaker 1: Milanie's lawyer, Wilson Tigue Tige Tie I don't know, said
Speaker 1: his client would be particularly vulnerable in custody as a
Speaker 1: gay man who is HIV positive. That's your concern now, listen,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't know how Australian jails get down.
Speaker 1: I don't I know an American jails. If you get
Speaker 1: locked up and you have this in your jacket, like
Speaker 1: you have this type of file in your record that
Speaker 1: you hurt children, the prisoners are gonna handle you. None
Speaker 1: to do with you being gay and got none to
Speaker 1: do with you being HIV positive. That's a ridiculous assumption.
Speaker 1: It has to do with the nature of the crimes
Speaker 1: you committed. So I'm assuming in Australia there's some sort
Speaker 1: of honor among thieves as far as that goes as well.
Speaker 1: I can't speak factually on that, but yeah, the lawyer
Speaker 1: is saying that because he's gay and HIV positive, he'll
Speaker 1: be at risk for people being mean to him. All right.
Speaker 1: After the property manager was denied bail, mister Milanie pleaded
Speaker 1: for his release, saying I do fear for my safety.
Speaker 1: Good as well, you should, you shit, heead I've been
Speaker 1: specifically told I'm going to be bashed in here if
Speaker 1: I go to prison. Yes, good, good, Okay, Australia is
Speaker 1: about the same as us in that regard. That makes
Speaker 1: me happy, mister Milina Milanie doesn't fucking matter, just whatever.
Speaker 1: Has been charged with using a carriage service to transmit
Speaker 1: and access child abuse materials, disseminating bestiality and animal crush material,
Speaker 1: and participating in a criminal group contributing to criminal activity.
Speaker 1: His lawyer describes the allegations as non contact offenses. Again,
Speaker 1: I got a hard time believing that, I really do.
Speaker 1: There's no videos alleged to show or feature mister Milanie
Speaker 1: or images that are said to future miss and Milanie whatsoever.
Speaker 1: Five other people are currently before court over there alleged
Speaker 1: links to this pedophile network WOW. NSW police alleged that
Speaker 1: mister Milanie is the last NSW based offender, but they
Speaker 1: said investigators have identified a further one hundred and forty
Speaker 1: five alleged offenders internationally, with referrals being made to law
Speaker 1: enforce agencies within Australia, the United States, Canada, Mexico, Europe,
Speaker 1: New Zealand, South America and Southeast Asia. Mister Milanie is
Speaker 1: expected to face court again on March thirty first. So again, y'all,
Speaker 1: as far as the horrible things that were going on
Speaker 1: on Epstein Island, right, please don't think that Epstein Island
Speaker 1: is the only place. This is a widespread issue and
Speaker 1: it's I'm not saying that this guy is clearly connected
Speaker 1: to Epstein. I'm saying that pockets of this type of
Speaker 1: evil exist everywhere. We have to root it out, we
Speaker 1: have to crush it. There's no other way to do this.
Speaker 1: I am personally the belief that somebody who is this
Speaker 1: demented are they are not capable of being institutionalized hard
Speaker 1: enough to be able to come back into civilized society
Speaker 1: and be a part of us. There are certain criminals
Speaker 1: that absolutely can, for sure, and there's all kinds of
Speaker 1: people that go to jail and turn their lives around
Speaker 1: and do amazing things, beastiality and pedophilic things. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: I don't believe that that person is ever going to
Speaker 1: get the wiring all right up top to be able
Speaker 1: to rejoin civilized society. Tony, what you got, big Dog?
Speaker 4: Well, as we discussed a while ago, but new our
Speaker 4: listeners might not have heard it, I believe Jerry Sandusky
Speaker 4: is innocent. There's plenty of people who are guilty, but
Speaker 4: Jerry Sandusky, all of his Salle mates believe him, and
Speaker 4: he is still alive and kicking and doing fine. Nobody
Speaker 4: has gone after him at all.
Speaker 1: So I remember talking about him a good while back.
Speaker 1: Was the allegations that he himself was doing the dirty work?
Speaker 1: Or was it that he was aware of one of
Speaker 1: his staff doing it and he did nothing about it.
Speaker 4: Oh, you're probably thinking of Joe Paterno, who was accused
Speaker 4: of Well, first, he was a star witness against Jerry Sandusky.
Speaker 4: He was never prosecuted, but Paterno was the one who
Speaker 4: was accused of knowing about Jerry Sandusky abused kids sexually
Speaker 4: and doing nothing about it because he was helping Paterno
Speaker 4: win games. But the reality has nothing happened. This was
Speaker 4: all mostly a big misunderstanding and accusers and their lawyers
Speaker 4: suing Penn State University for one hundred million dollars?
Speaker 1: Is that what the the overarching reason behind it was.
Speaker 4: Yeah, mainly money, one hundred million dollars.
Speaker 1: See that's my other thing. You're you're talking about dragging
Speaker 1: somebody through the mud, and it's not just the reputation.
Speaker 1: Pedophiles are not received well in prison like this could
Speaker 1: have ended his life if people in prison believed the
Speaker 1: allegations this all. Was there any kind of other dirt
Speaker 1: on this? Is this a power moved by somebody, that somebody
Speaker 1: have some sort of a vendetta against him and they
Speaker 1: decide to accuse of the worst types of things, or
Speaker 1: from what you could tell, was all a money scandal.
Speaker 4: Mostly money, But some people wanted Joe Paterno to retire
Speaker 4: because he was born in nineteen twenty six, he was
Speaker 4: already very old and he hadn't won a game in
Speaker 4: a while, so there was some office politics going on there,
Speaker 4: but nothing in terms of Epstein's style espionage or deep
Speaker 4: state stuff or you know, spycraft, nothing like that. It
Speaker 4: was just a perfect storm. Jerry Sandusky was very naive
Speaker 4: and he did not put up any significant legal defense
Speaker 4: of himself. Neither did his wife. Why not, though, Well,
Speaker 4: they just trusted that everything would work out okay, and
Speaker 4: they trusted their lawyer, who was very incompetent, who just
Speaker 4: told him, oh, just remain silent. It's the prosecution's job
Speaker 4: to convict you, and you should just remain silent, don't
Speaker 4: testify in court. Big mistake, just one mistake after another.
Speaker 4: Skipped the preliminary hearing which could have aged to the
Speaker 4: case a little bit. There's lots of little things there.
Speaker 4: But what he's actually guilty of is he was born
Speaker 4: in nineteen forty four and he grew up at a
Speaker 4: time when it was normal for coaches to shower with
Speaker 4: their teams, and then he was still doing it in
Speaker 4: the nineties with his teams after it was no longer
Speaker 4: socially acceptable. But that's all he did. He did that.
Speaker 4: And let's see, another common accusation was he put his
Speaker 4: hand on boys knees to talk to them about things
Speaker 4: because he thought of himself as a father figure to them.
Speaker 4: But that's the only real stuff he ever actually did.
Speaker 4: And the accusations, there's only one accuser who accused him
Speaker 4: of anal rape, and there was another one who accused
Speaker 4: him of making him give him oral sex a bunch.
Speaker 4: I know I'm getting helographic right here, but it's kind
Speaker 4: of necessary.
Speaker 1: You're fine.
Speaker 4: I know that that's not much for this show. But yeah,
Speaker 4: the one who accused him of forcing him to perform
Speaker 4: oral sex apparently didn't notice that Jerry Sandusky has no balls.
Speaker 4: His balls actually atropeed away a long time ago, and
Speaker 4: there's medical records of this, and it's a true diagnosed
Speaker 4: metal condition. That's why Sandusky didn't have any biological children.
Speaker 4: So he was probably unable to do anything with his penis.
Speaker 4: It's a hormonal thing, all right.
Speaker 1: That's that's something I didn't know about two minutes ago.
Speaker 1: Here we are, okay, So without balls, does it? Does
Speaker 1: he is he unable to get erect correct?
Speaker 4: Well, it would be kind of hard to prove, and
Speaker 4: he was kind of embarrassed. He was too embarrassed to
Speaker 4: bring us up at trial. And his lawyer who knew
Speaker 4: about it. Didn't bring it up either, but it's true. Okay, Well, anyway,
Speaker 4: he's innocent. Most of pedophiles are guilty, and they can
Speaker 4: be thrown in a wood ship or for all I care,
Speaker 4: a few of them out there are innocent. Thanks for
Speaker 4: letting me.
Speaker 1: You're good dog. You've said this about Jerry Sandusky before,
Speaker 1: We've never actually gone into it. So I'm gonna have
Speaker 1: to relook at this situation and be honest with you.
Speaker 1: I didn't know much about it, just what I had
Speaker 1: heard from from you know, from the Zeitgeist, if you will.
Speaker 1: I haven't actually looked at the file or the case,
Speaker 1: I should say myself, but like, okay, it's very possible
Speaker 1: Jerry Sandusky is completely innocent. Holy fuck. Okay, let's go
Speaker 1: on to the next topic of discussion here. So the
Speaker 1: Benghazi attack. Everybody remembers that, right, there was a whole
Speaker 1: movie thirteen hours. You know, we were just talking about
Speaker 1: how first ladies shouldn't have movies made after them. Somehow
Speaker 1: Malania just had a movie made about her. I still
Speaker 1: don't understand why, And now I thought about him, like, no, actually,
Speaker 1: you know, Killery did have a movie made about her.
Speaker 1: It with the whole thirteen hours Bengazi situation, so I
Speaker 1: guess maybe. But anyway, so America has done this whole
Speaker 1: yoinkening thing with Maduro, president of Venezuela. People have heard
Speaker 1: apparently we just went and joined one of the suspects
Speaker 1: who was like the leader of the Bengazi attack. We
Speaker 1: quote unquote extradited him to the United States. We fucking
Speaker 1: joint this guy in the middle of the night. That
Speaker 1: is absolutely what took place here, and I'm not mad
Speaker 1: at it. Certain people in the international community are saying
Speaker 1: that America needs to calm him down and quit acting
Speaker 1: like we could do whatever we want. But it's like,
Speaker 1: but but we can, now, but we can, And that's
Speaker 1: kind of It's not a good stance to take, but
Speaker 1: it's also not an incorrect stance to take. But anyway,
Speaker 1: let's get into it here. ABC News reporting on this.
Speaker 1: A suspect in the twenty twelve terrorist attack on US
Speaker 1: embassy and Benghazi, Libya has been arrested and brought back
Speaker 1: to the United States. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Friday.
Speaker 1: Now we're gonna talk about Pam Bondi a little bit
Speaker 1: more later and hear from her as she flounders in
Speaker 1: the house. But we'll get to her in a moment anyway,
Speaker 1: zoo by year Al Bukhousch Bakoush, I don't know, was
Speaker 1: brought back to Andrew's Air Force Base at three a m.
Speaker 1: Bondi said at a press conference alongside FBI Director Cash
Speaker 1: Battel and US Attorney Janine Piro. On September eleventh, twenty twelve,
Speaker 1: a group of men stormed into the diplomatic compound in
Speaker 1: Benghazi in an attack that killed for Americans. The suspect
Speaker 1: is charged with the murder of Ambassador Chris Stevens and
Speaker 1: the three others. Piro said Bakoush was first charged with
Speaker 1: or was first charged by complaint in twenty fifteen, which
Speaker 1: was sealed for eleven years. The eight count indictment has
Speaker 1: now been unsealed. She said. It charges Bakoush with the
Speaker 1: murder of Ambassador Chris Stevens, the murder of State Department
Speaker 1: employee Sean Smith, an attempted murder of State Department special
Speaker 1: Agent Scott Wickland, and conspiracy to provide materials for terrorists
Speaker 1: and support that resulted in the deaths of four Americans,
Speaker 1: as well as arson at the special Mission Wow continuing
Speaker 1: on al Bakoush made his initial appearance before a magistrate
Speaker 1: judge while in custody later Friday. He was represented by
Speaker 1: a stand in attorney and the court deferred his arraignment
Speaker 1: until a permanent appointed council is assigned. Prosecutors said they
Speaker 1: will seek per excuse me, pre trial detention. A detention
Speaker 1: hearing is expected to be hailed next week. This is
Speaker 1: the first arrest in nearly nine years in connection with
Speaker 1: the attack. In twenty seventeen, the US captured one of
Speaker 1: the suspects in the attack, Mustafa al Imam, and extradited
Speaker 1: him to the United States for trial. He was later
Speaker 1: convicted on two criminal counts and sentenced to nineteen years
Speaker 1: in prison. So and again, I don't know for a
Speaker 1: fact if this dude was one of the masterminds, if
Speaker 1: you will. What I am saying is America sent in
Speaker 1: these boys that are doing some some I you want
Speaker 1: to call it some moons out goons out type of situation.
Speaker 1: And they went and you woint this guy up, and
Speaker 1: so now he's gonna be facing charges. So and uh yeah,
Speaker 1: just to kind of recap on this one, people watched
Speaker 1: the movie, and a lot of things in the movie.
Speaker 1: They did get correct. A lot of things in the movie.
Speaker 1: They also kind of drummed up for dramatic flare because
Speaker 1: it was in fact a film, and I get that.
Speaker 1: The fact of the matter is that your boy Chris
Speaker 1: was not dead when the fire went on, and there's
Speaker 1: all types of pictures of him being drug through the streets,
Speaker 1: still alive. Once the rioters, for lack of better words,
Speaker 1: got a hold to him, and they they tortured him
Speaker 1: to death. They they raped him, they shoved cattle prods
Speaker 1: into certain spots of his body. It was it was
Speaker 1: a horrible situation. All of that would have been avoided
Speaker 1: by the then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. And I
Speaker 1: know for effact. I have a guy served with who
Speaker 1: his unit was on a mew in the area and
Speaker 1: they were actually parked off the coast of Libya, very
Speaker 1: similarly to how American forces were parked off the coast
Speaker 1: of Venezuela, same situation. It was a whole battle group
Speaker 1: and they were standing by just in case things went sideways.
Speaker 1: The day that the attacks started, they geared up. They
Speaker 1: were waiting to get on to birds that they can
Speaker 1: go in and extract everybody. They were called by somebody
Speaker 1: from way higher up than the captain to stand down. Now,
Speaker 1: my buddy, being lower level enlisted guy, wasn't privy to
Speaker 1: who that call came from. But everybody understands that that
Speaker 1: call wouldn't have come from the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs.
Speaker 1: That call wouldn't have come from the Regional Admiral. That
Speaker 1: call wouldn't have come from Obama because he wouldn't have
Speaker 1: given a fuck it. Shirton certainly wouldn't have come from
Speaker 1: Biden because he wouldn't have given a fuck. This had
Speaker 1: to come from somebody else. It's understood pretty heavily that
Speaker 1: this was the Secretary of State that made that call
Speaker 1: and said stand down. For what reason? What was her plot?
Speaker 1: I can't tell you, but I am happy that at
Speaker 1: least a little bit more justice is going to be served.
Speaker 1: I don't know if nineteen years is long enough, but
Speaker 1: I suppose it depends on the condition at which he'll
Speaker 1: be kept. Is he going into black site somewhere? Is
Speaker 1: he going to Gittmo? I don't know. I don't know.
Speaker 1: So we'll see, we will see. This guy hasn't been
Speaker 1: sentenced yet. The court case is coming up, but I
Speaker 1: did want to bring that up that America is in
Speaker 1: the season of the yoinkening, and with that we got
Speaker 1: another one. Anyway, moving on here now that we're talking
Speaker 1: about the international community for just a moment here, CBS
Speaker 1: News NATO to shift two commands from the United States
Speaker 1: to your leadership. Amid Trump's demands that NATO give more
Speaker 1: to its defense. I found this one interesting. Trump went
Speaker 1: in not too terribly long ago and basically said that
Speaker 1: every NATO country needs to start spending five percent of
Speaker 1: their GDP just to strengthen their defenses, which, on the
Speaker 1: onset and even looking deeper, I can't disagree with our
Speaker 1: allies being more heavily armed and equipped and having their
Speaker 1: militaries upped. I don't see that as a negative. Not
Speaker 1: to mention the infrastructure advancements that were going to be
Speaker 1: made with a portion of that five percent. I'm here for.
Speaker 1: I understand that I have no dog in the fight
Speaker 1: of what happens with France's infrastructure, or Germany or Italy.
Speaker 1: I understand that, but I am also very much in
Speaker 1: favor of people's lives being made better for infrastructure adaptations
Speaker 1: and upgrades. As well as everybody having a very strong, capable,
Speaker 1: well funded, well trained military. I'm on board with all
Speaker 1: of that, but apparently certain countries have felt some type
Speaker 1: of way about that. So Trump had to literally threatened
Speaker 1: to remove America from NATO. And then all the countries
Speaker 1: magically just found the money and their budgets to go
Speaker 1: to five percent. And again, I understand we're still in
Speaker 1: the early months of this. We will see how that
Speaker 1: shakes out over the next couple of years and if
Speaker 1: that's really sustainable. I get that. But apparently NATO has
Speaker 1: decided to shift two commands from the United States to
Speaker 1: the European leadership amid Trump's demands. So let's get into
Speaker 1: it here. As President Trump continues to press Europe to
Speaker 1: contribute more to its own defensed defense rather, NATO announced
Speaker 1: two joint force commands would transition from US leadership to
Speaker 1: European in the coming years. The move is part of
Speaker 1: a shift to more fairly sharing responsibility within NATO, with
Speaker 1: the European allies taking on greater leadership roles in NATO's
Speaker 1: command structure. I'm gonna be honest, I don't mind this.
Speaker 1: I don't mind this. NATO said this in a statement
Speaker 1: ahead of meeting of Defense ministers this week. The statement
Speaker 1: also noted that the US would continue to maintain the
Speaker 1: role of Supreme Allied Commander Europe or Saucer. I'm sorry
Speaker 1: what the US would continue to maintain the role of
Speaker 1: Supreme Allied Commander Europe or Saucier. Wow, that's great. That's great.
Speaker 1: As part of making clear the US commitment to NATO
Speaker 1: command and control, last month, the Trump administration released its
Speaker 1: National Defense Strategy, with which emphasized that NATO allies should
Speaker 1: take the primary responsibility for Europe's defense as the US
Speaker 1: focuses more on defending the homeland and deterring China. The
Speaker 1: lead author of that strategy, Under Secretary of Defense for
Speaker 1: Policy Elbridge Colby, is expected to attend the NATO Defense
Speaker 1: Ministerial this week instead of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Interesting
Speaker 1: this is the first NATO Defense mine Hegseth has skipped
Speaker 1: since taking office. The transition in leadership of the two
Speaker 1: commands is expected to take place gradually over the next
Speaker 1: few years. If Pentagon officials said the decision to transfer
Speaker 1: commands was made jointly among all allies. The decision strengthens
Speaker 1: the Alliance by showing European leadership in European defense and
Speaker 1: enhancing European defense capabilities. The official saidness statement again, I'm
Speaker 1: in favor of this, honestly. The command in Norfolk, Virginia
Speaker 1: has facilities on a larger installation that will remain under
Speaker 1: the control of the US Navy when a UK officer
Speaker 1: assumes command. According to the website, it is NATO's newest
Speaker 1: operational command and focuses on protecting the Atlantic and the Arctic.
Speaker 1: They're moving more towards Greenland, y'all see it. I'm just
Speaker 1: saying Italy will take over Joint Force Command Naples. Oh god,
Speaker 1: all right, I mean, don't get me wrong, that makes sense.
Speaker 1: But also it at least got their own problems to
Speaker 1: worry about right now, which we're gonna be talking about
Speaker 1: the gunfight here in a minute anyway. While Germany and
Speaker 1: Poland will on a rotational basis share command of Joint
Speaker 1: Force Command runsom currently led by Germany. I'm good with that.
Speaker 1: Germany's military is on the ups, Poland has become little
Speaker 1: European Texas. They're here for it. So yeah, I like this.
Speaker 1: Once the changes are made, all three Joint Force commands
Speaker 1: that lead operations in crisis will be under European leadership.
Speaker 1: The US will take leadership of the Allied Maritime Command GOOD,
Speaker 1: which is currently led by a UK Vice admiral. This
Speaker 1: means the US will lead the three functional commands Allied
Speaker 1: Maritime Command, Allied Land Command, and Allied Air Command. The
Speaker 1: saucer commander of all NATO forces is a position that
Speaker 1: has always been held by an American officer. Air Force
Speaker 1: General Alexis Alexis G. Grin grinkawick Okay, who leads the
Speaker 1: eighty thousand US service members currently in the US European Command,
Speaker 1: is the current Supreme Allied Commander. That's a pretty dope title.
Speaker 1: The Supreme Allied Commander of NATO. That's an actual title.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying it's pretty dope anyway. So, yes, NATO
Speaker 1: is shifting a couple of commands around. I don't see
Speaker 1: this as an inherently negative thing. And if anything else,
Speaker 1: this gives America a chance to put more assets where
Speaker 1: we need them on our home turf, which has been
Speaker 1: a thing that everybody's been talking about for you know, years.
Speaker 1: So I'm good with that. Really wanted to talk about
Speaker 1: it though, so now talking about international things, and as
Speaker 1: we're talking about the UK from that last article, the
Speaker 1: Ebstein files has sparked a political crisis threatening the UK government.
Speaker 1: Here's what's happening. So, for anybody who doesn't know, Prime
Speaker 1: Minister Keir Starmer has been under intense pressure to resign.
Speaker 1: First of all, he was already under intense pressure to
Speaker 1: resign before these Epstein conversations began. Most and I don't
Speaker 1: mean fifty one percent. The best statistics I can find
Speaker 1: for him says that somewhere between fifteen and twenty percent
Speaker 1: of people in the UK are neutral towards him. There's
Speaker 1: I want to say five percent that are very pro him.
Speaker 1: The vast majority of the UK. And by the way,
Speaker 1: I don't mean of immigrants, I mean of people born
Speaker 1: in the UK. I noticed I didn't say things about
Speaker 1: skin color. I didn't say things about religion. I didn't
Speaker 1: say things about socioeconomic background. I didn't say that. I'm
Speaker 1: saying people that were born in jolly old England. The
Speaker 1: vast majority of them had very high hopes for him,
Speaker 1: and they do not fuck with him as of the
Speaker 1: last year and a half, if not more. But anyway,
Speaker 1: so he has been under intense pressure to resign, which
Speaker 1: is good he needs to. It follows his decision to
Speaker 1: appoint Peter mandels Mandelssohn as Britain's ambassador in Washington, despite
Speaker 1: knowledge of his connections to the sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 1: So here's where things get a little deeper here among
Speaker 1: Starmer's potential replacements and his former deputy Angela Rayner, health
Speaker 1: Minister West Streeting, and former Labor Party leader Ed Milliband. Okay,
Speaker 1: so apparently your boy knew that mandelssh was tied to Epstein,
Speaker 1: and it's not Oh, I went and had a lunch
Speaker 1: with him one time. Apparently Mandelssh was a he's on
Speaker 1: the list. He's like on the list, And we haven't
Speaker 1: gotten that name out as far as the cult of
Speaker 1: conspiracy and the deep dive that we're doing into the files,
Speaker 1: but trust me, these all are coming out in good
Speaker 1: time people as they are. We're working on it. But
Speaker 1: apparently he knew about this and still appointed him to
Speaker 1: be the ambassador to the United States. And it's also
Speaker 1: kind of a weird thing to do knowing that the
Speaker 1: Epstein files were under review. Maybe he believed that they
Speaker 1: would never see the light of day and it was
Speaker 1: gonna be no big deal. But beside the point, you
Speaker 1: knew who this guy was. You knew that this guy
Speaker 1: was a sex offender. I'm talking about Mandelsson, and you
Speaker 1: still appointed him to be ambassador to the country where
Speaker 1: Epstein currently resided or still resides. I don't believe he's dead,
Speaker 1: but be at the point. The release of further Epstein
Speaker 1: files last week triggered a series of events that left
Speaker 1: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer fighting for his political life,
Speaker 1: despite the fact that he never knew the late financier
Speaker 1: and sex officer. No he didn't. Keir Starmer is not
Speaker 1: on the list. I haven't seen him come up one time,
Speaker 1: but your boy did. Starmer is under pressure over his
Speaker 1: decision to appoint Peter Mandelssh as US ambassador despite knowledge
Speaker 1: of Mandelsson's connections to Epstein. The latest dot or comments
Speaker 1: released by the US Department of Justice revealed more messages
Speaker 1: between Mandalsh and Epstein, including after Epstein had played guilty
Speaker 1: in Florida to a state charge of felony solicitation of prostitution,
Speaker 1: a case that involved an underage girl. Starmer, who's facing
Speaker 1: calls to step down, has apologized to the victims of
Speaker 1: Epstein for believing Mandalsson's lies. No, see, that's the problem.
Speaker 1: That's the issue. Mandelssohn didn't lie to him about his connections.
Speaker 1: He told him straight up. Starmer decided to hire him
Speaker 1: for the position anyway. That's the issue. So apologizing to
Speaker 1: the victims at this point is it's less than pissing
Speaker 1: in the wind. Honestly, Starmer's cabinet ministers have sought to
Speaker 1: rally around him, y'all that they have, who has faced
Speaker 1: growing anger from opposition parties and members of his own
Speaker 1: party over the decision to appoint Mandleson. Two resignations in
Speaker 1: quick succession have ratcheted up pressure, with Starmer's chief of
Speaker 1: staff Morgan McSweeney and communications director Tim Allen tim Allen
Speaker 1: both stepping down. Wow, so too of these people are like, yeah, dude, sorry,
Speaker 1: I'm not going down with the ship with you on
Speaker 1: this one. The fur led Annis Sarwar, who leads Starmar's
Speaker 1: Labor party in Scotland, to call on Starmer to resign.
Speaker 1: Another party leader from a different nation has called for
Speaker 1: you to resign. That's great. The distraction needs to end
Speaker 1: and the leadership in Downing Street has to change, star
Speaker 1: Wars said at a press conference on Monday. Starmer heild
Speaker 1: a pivotal meeting with Labor members of Parliament afterwards, in
Speaker 1: which he reportedly said he was not prepared to walk away. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you may not have a choice here soon, buddy. A
Speaker 1: spokesperson for the Prime Minister's office, was not immediately available
Speaker 1: for comment. I'll bet now who is Peter mandelssh Mandalsh
Speaker 1: has been a key figure for the center left Labor
Speaker 1: Party for decades, playing a pivotal role in the so
Speaker 1: called New Labor movement that saw Tony Blair become Prime
Speaker 1: Minister after a landslide election victory in nineteen ninety seven.
Speaker 1: Known as being the scenes fixer and nicknamed the Prince
Speaker 1: of Darkness, I'm gonna reiterate that the guy with known
Speaker 1: ties to Epstein after he was an understood pedophile before
Speaker 1: he knew exactly who Epstein was. He was known behind
Speaker 1: the scenes as a fixer for the party and was
Speaker 1: nicknamed the Prince of Darkness. Manilsson was a Labor member
Speaker 1: of Parliament from nineteen ninety two to two thousand and
Speaker 1: four and served in Blair's cabinet. He left Parliament to
Speaker 1: become a European Commissioner, before returning to Britain in two
Speaker 1: thousand and eight to work with the then Prime Minister
Speaker 1: Gordon Brown, having been appointed to Parliament's unelected House of Lords. Okay,
Speaker 1: we're already getting into the mix of it. Here. This
Speaker 1: is him standing right behind old President Donnie t Again.
Speaker 1: He was the Ambassador for America after becoming Prime Minister
Speaker 1: in July twenty twenty four. Starmer appointed Mandalsen as ambassador
Speaker 1: in Washington that December, a role he described at the
Speaker 1: time as a great honor quote unquote. The appointment was controversial,
Speaker 1: as Mandalssh had twice previously resigned in nineteen ninety eight
Speaker 1: and in two thousand and one over scandals, one about
Speaker 1: not declaring alone and another about allegedly influencing a passport application. Interesting.
Speaker 1: Starmer fired Mandelssen from the ambassadorship in September after Downing
Speaker 1: Street said new information had come to light about the
Speaker 1: extent of his association with Epstein. The subsequent release of
Speaker 1: millions of files from the US Department of Justice last
Speaker 1: week showed further links between Manderson and Epstein. They prompted
Speaker 1: accusations that Mandalstin had sent market sensitive government information as
Speaker 1: Epstein following the two thousand and eight global financial crisis.
Speaker 1: One exchange appeared to show Mandalson given Epstein advanced notice
Speaker 1: of an impending five hundred billion euro bailout for banks
Speaker 1: in twenty ten, and a statement to UK brought broadcaster
Speaker 1: Sky News. Last month, Manderson apologized for remaining friends with
Speaker 1: Epstein following his two thousand and eight conviction. Yeah, I'll bet,
Speaker 1: I'll bet. I was not culpable. I was not knowledgeable
Speaker 1: for what he was doing. And I regret and will
Speaker 1: regret to my dying day, the fact that powerless women
Speaker 1: were not given the protection that they were entitled to expect.
Speaker 1: That is a lie. That is a lie. In eight
Speaker 1: he was brought down for these charges. It was understood
Speaker 1: that's when he was all fored the sweetest of sweetheart
Speaker 1: deals I've ever heard of my life. So not only
Speaker 1: did you give him the advanced knowledge about the bailout
Speaker 1: or you sent a market sense of information excuse me
Speaker 1: in eight, you gave him advanced notice of the bailout
Speaker 1: in twenty ten, and the files show a lot more
Speaker 1: than that. By the way, the UK government borrowing costs
Speaker 1: jumped on Monday amid growing pressure on Starmer. So now
Speaker 1: let's talk about what happens with the markets now that
Speaker 1: the Prime Minister is being told to fucking leave dude.
Speaker 1: By Tuesday, after many cabinet ministers rallied around the Prime minister,
Speaker 1: yields on UK government bonds known as guilts were moving lower.
Speaker 1: The yield on the benchmark ten year guilt was three
Speaker 1: basis points lower than four point four nine six percent,
Speaker 1: while the thirty year guilt yield also fell by four
Speaker 1: basis points to settle at five point three h nine.
Speaker 1: I don't know if these are good or bad. Honestly,
Speaker 1: I don't really know much about how government bonds work.
Speaker 1: I know what they are, I don't know how their
Speaker 1: movements go on a year to year basis. Uncertainty over
Speaker 1: Keir Starmer's future is unhelpful for the UK bond market,
Speaker 1: particularly since inflation is on track to fall quite sharply
Speaker 1: in the coming months and the Bank of England appears
Speaker 1: to be gearing up to cut interest rates as soon
Speaker 1: as March, with one or two further cuts later in
Speaker 1: the year. Charlie Lloyd, head of Investments at Shackleton Advisors
Speaker 1: said in a Monday note. You know we just talked
Speaker 1: about this too. The Bank of England is currently preparing
Speaker 1: them themselves for an alien disclosure event to take place
Speaker 1: in America. I don't understand it. I don't know much
Speaker 1: about Britain's finances. I know they're not doing as hot
Speaker 1: as they once were. I get that. But are you
Speaker 1: telling me that their financial system is so fragile that
Speaker 1: one guy getting fired, a prime minister losing his job,
Speaker 1: and an alien invasion or an an alien disclosure rather
Speaker 1: is enough to bankrupt the country. These are things that
Speaker 1: really shouldn't matter. The two shouldn't be connected, but somehow
Speaker 1: all of them are connected. It's not giving me a
Speaker 1: whole lot of confidence anyway. Star wars resignation would trigger
Speaker 1: a contest within the Labor Party to replace him as leader,
Speaker 1: which would almost certainly lead to short term volatility in
Speaker 1: the UK bond market as an increase in the cost
Speaker 1: of borrowing through higher yields. Again, I'm not a finance guy.
Speaker 1: I don't understand how that connects, but okay, whatever a
Speaker 1: prolonged contest could impact the economy of guilt yields traded
Speaker 1: at a premium to other bonds markets for an extended period,
Speaker 1: not to mention to the potential impact on consumer confidence.
Speaker 1: She continued, All right, so who could replace Starmer? Let's
Speaker 1: talk about it here. If Starmer resigned, a leadership contest
Speaker 1: or replace him would start and involve a series of
Speaker 1: voting whittling down the candidates. If Starmer refused to resign,
Speaker 1: but a challenger gained enough support to trigger a leadership vote,
Speaker 1: the Prime Minister and that challenger would be put to
Speaker 1: the ballot. Either process could take weeks. So let's talk
Speaker 1: about it here. Left leaning Angela Rayner, who resigned as
Speaker 1: Deputy Prime Minister last autumn after a tax scandal, is
Speaker 1: currently the Health Minister I'm sorry. The current Health Minister
Speaker 1: at Wes streeting and former party leader Ed Milliban. Andy Burnham,
Speaker 1: the current mayor of Greater Manchester, was recently blocked from
Speaker 1: standing in a special election that could have seen him
Speaker 1: return to Parliament. Despite Burnham's popularity, investors are aware of
Speaker 1: a pivot away from efforts by Starmer and his finance minister.
Speaker 1: Rachel reeves to shore up UK's public finance. Anyway, That's
Speaker 1: pretty much the end of the article. But yeah, so keer.
Speaker 1: Starmer has already been in hot water for how he's
Speaker 1: run his country, and now the Epstein files have come
Speaker 1: out to the level that they have. People are really
Speaker 1: asking for him to step down and leave. It's not
Speaker 1: a good look. It's not a good time to be
Speaker 1: old mister Starmer. With the Epstein file conversation going on,
Speaker 1: I wanted to play this clip. Okay, it's a little over,
Speaker 1: it's a little under six minutes, and this is going
Speaker 1: to show the best parts, in my opinion, or at
Speaker 1: least some of them, of Pam Bondy floundering when she
Speaker 1: is being questioned about very basic things, very basic things,
Speaker 1: very yes, no answers, but she simply can't help herself.
Speaker 1: Y'all tell me what y'all think about this. I would
Speaker 1: love to actually hear our members are our group here.
Speaker 1: I would love to hear y'all's hot take on this one.
Speaker 1: After this video plays, let's watch it together. MS.
Speaker 5: Crockett from Texas is recognance for.
Speaker 1: U see thank you so much.
Speaker 6: Donald Trump's approval rating implodes on his strongest issue.
Speaker 1: This is from Newsweek Today. It says people.
Speaker 6: And border security, while sixty disapproved.
Speaker 1: Without objection and admitted. Now I recognize the gentleman from California,
Speaker 1: mister Lou sorry' all, I should have clipped it to
Speaker 1: this point that lady rambling about Trump's approval ratings. Okay, yeah,
Speaker 1: Trump's approval ratings are not doing great either right now.
Speaker 1: But that's not that's the point of this. So without
Speaker 1: further ado, no, let's hear this.
Speaker 6: Thank you, atturning your own body for being here today.
Speaker 6: I'm gonna show you two photos.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 6: I'm gonna show you two photos of former Prince Andrew.
Speaker 6: Prince Andrew attended various parties with Jeffrey Epstein. Under the
Speaker 6: law of congress past, you are allowed to redact photos
Speaker 6: to protect the victims of Epstein's sex trafficking operation. You
Speaker 6: redacted the photos of this victim's face because you are
Speaker 6: following the congressional laws.
Speaker 1: That correct.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry that we redacted the victims.
Speaker 6: Because you're following the congressional law.
Speaker 1: Correct.
Speaker 6: Yes, okay, you have now established that we please put
Speaker 6: the photos back up, that we are looking at a
Speaker 6: sex trafficking victim under the Federal Victims Trafficking Protection Act.
Speaker 6: Not only is Jeffrey Epstein guilty, but anyone who patronizes
Speaker 6: Epstein's sex operation is also guilty of a crime. That's
Speaker 6: why I find it absolutely despicable that you sought to
Speaker 6: protect Epstein's clients like former Prince Andrew. Last your lie,
Speaker 6: you close the case on Epstein's abusers.
Speaker 4: The July twenty twenty five memo from.
Speaker 6: Your Department Justice stated, quote, we did not uncover evidence
Speaker 6: that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties. These
Speaker 6: two photos. Please put the photos back up. These two
Speaker 6: photos steering you in the face are evidence of a
Speaker 6: crime and more than enough evidence to predicate an investigation
Speaker 6: against former Prince Andrew. So I asked you a turned
Speaker 6: your old pambondy. Why did you shut down this investigation
Speaker 6: last July? And why have you not prosecuted former Prince Andrew.
Speaker 2: I don't believe you asked Merrik Garland these questions when
Speaker 2: he was Attorney General and before I.
Speaker 6: Agree with you time, I agree with you. I agree
Speaker 6: with you during the during the Biden administration, I called
Speaker 6: for people looking at Epstein files. Merret Garland dropped the ball,
Speaker 6: as did Attorney General Bill bar as did Alex Acosta.
Speaker 6: A whole string of failures. But you are in charge.
Speaker 6: You have the power to change things, to hold these
Speaker 6: men accountable, and you're doing the opposite, you're protecting them.
Speaker 6: So I want to move on to another man, Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: I want to move out another question.
Speaker 2: Your question about protecting.
Speaker 6: Answered the question you're saying, No, I want to discuss
Speaker 6: another man, Donald Trump, who is all over the Epstein files,
Speaker 6: like former Prince. Here's a video.
Speaker 1: They're just playing this party clip for anybody listening right now.
Speaker 1: They're playing the clip of Donald Trump and Jeffrey I
Speaker 1: have seen at that party with all the models from
Speaker 1: the Miss USA pageant and all that. So just to
Speaker 1: we're all clear of what that was. Anyway, moving forward,
Speaker 1: let's continue.
Speaker 6: Former Prince Andrew Donald Trump but under various parties with
Speaker 6: Jeffrey Epstein. I want to know whether any underage girls
Speaker 6: at that party or at any party that Trump attended
Speaker 6: with Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 2: This is so ridiculous and that they are trying to
Speaker 2: deflect from all the great things Donald Trump has done.
Speaker 2: There is no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime.
Speaker 2: Everyone knows that this has been the most transparent presidency.
Speaker 1: He's the one.
Speaker 2: I got your answer, legislation.
Speaker 1: This is time belongs to the gentleman from California.
Speaker 6: Okay, I'm going to put up another document from a
Speaker 6: witness who called the FBI's National Threat Operations Center because
Speaker 6: I believe you just lie under oath. There is ample
Speaker 6: of it into epstein phone.
Speaker 2: Don't you ever accuse me of a I believe you.
Speaker 6: Just lie under oath. And this is all on videotape.
Speaker 6: You said there's no events of a crime. I'm showing you.
Speaker 6: Here is a witness statement who called into the fi's
Speaker 6: Threat Operations Center. He drove Donald Trump around in limo.
Speaker 6: He overheard what Donald Trump said to Jeffrey on his
Speaker 6: cell phone. He was so angry he was going to
Speaker 6: stop a limo and hurt Donald Trump. And he met
Speaker 6: a girl who said she was raped by Donald Trump
Speaker 6: and Jeffrey Epstein. She later had her head blown off,
Speaker 6: and the officers at the scene said that could not
Speaker 6: have been suicide.
Speaker 4: No one, no one at the.
Speaker 6: Point of justice interviewed this witness.
Speaker 4: You need to interview this witness immediately.
Speaker 6: Epstein should rot in hell, so should the men who
Speaker 6: patronize this operation. And as we say here today, there
Speaker 6: are over one thousand sex trafficking victims and you have
Speaker 6: not held a single man account.
Speaker 4: Shame on you.
Speaker 6: If you had any decency, you would resign right after this.
Speaker 1: Here, gentleman has expired. May I respond, Yeah, I don't
Speaker 1: know how you respond. I did not ask a question
Speaker 1: you're allowed to.
Speaker 2: I did not ask a crime in California. He does
Speaker 2: not want to talk about I did.
Speaker 1: Not ask ame in I did not ask a question. Man,
Speaker 1: he will be in order. The gentleman is yielding beck
Speaker 1: his time. Okay, Okay, So here's here's my takeaway from this.
Speaker 1: So when asked a very simple question, she doesn't just
Speaker 1: give a yes no answer. Right. And yes, I'm not
Speaker 1: a big fan of the uh mister lou I think
Speaker 1: his name was. He's a Democrat out of California. And
Speaker 1: I'm not a big fan of history voting track record.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be honest with you. But that's not the
Speaker 1: conversation that we're having right now. Okay. So all the
Speaker 1: conversation about Pam BONDI saying that there was no evidence
Speaker 1: of any other wrongdoings, these over a thousand victims and
Speaker 1: all of this it was just for Epstein and just
Speaker 1: for Maxwell, and there was no other implicated parties and
Speaker 1: saying that there was no evidence of the implicated parties
Speaker 1: when shown a picture that would say that that is incorrect.
Speaker 1: That means that she'd definitely lied a year ago. Then
Speaker 1: to say that there was no credible evidence as far
Speaker 1: as Donning Tea is concerned. Now, granted, I'm not I
Speaker 1: hope that Donald Trump is not a pedophile. I can't
Speaker 1: say with one hundred percent confidence that I believe that
Speaker 1: statement as of this moment. I don't know. I don't know.
Speaker 1: All I'm saying is that just now there is evidence
Speaker 1: to say that that is a true statement. Pam Bondi
Speaker 1: said that it's not. And instead all she did, and
Speaker 1: she did this multiple times, y'all. She started pulling up, well,
Speaker 1: what's going on in California? And then this other guy
Speaker 1: from New York asked her some questions. She started holding
Speaker 1: up illegal immigrants that were committing crimes in New York
Speaker 1: as like a counter argument to the questions about Epstein.
Speaker 1: It's it's it's mind blowing. I would love to hear
Speaker 1: what y'all's take is on this, because of all the
Speaker 1: clips and all the videos I saw about Pam Bondy
Speaker 1: in this situation. The House Judiciary Committee. She was floundering
Speaker 1: at best. What do y'all think here?
Speaker 7: It's crazy how this is all going down where we
Speaker 7: conspiracy other than the true community knew that she was
Speaker 7: that that she that she was lying. Whenever they said
Speaker 7: that there was nothing nothing to see here, let's all
Speaker 7: move on. And this just kind of proves that we
Speaker 7: were right. And the fact that she was trying to deflect,
Speaker 7: like you know, it seemed before she was in a
Speaker 7: position and her answers were a lot more direct, and
Speaker 7: here's what's going on when it comes to when it
Speaker 7: came to all of these files, it just seems like
Speaker 7: it's been a complete stone wall. So now that all
Speaker 7: the truth is being exposed and there's what four a
Speaker 7: million more to go, this just proves that they were lying.
Speaker 7: And she did not do a very good job of
Speaker 7: defending the questions. But I mean, whenever you don't want
Speaker 7: to answer there affirmative to those questions, you know, she
Speaker 7: was trying, you know, she was doing whatever other politician does,
Speaker 7: just trying to stew as many words and here try
Speaker 7: to look over here, why she tries to hope that
Speaker 7: the person asking the question forgets his line of reasoning.
Speaker 1: In questioning, right, Yeah, and she did that all day
Speaker 1: for the record, Deny, deny, deny, make counter arguments, make
Speaker 1: counter accusations, you know, try to dissuade the conversation to
Speaker 1: a whole different thing. It was. It was bad. And
Speaker 1: you know, I didn't know much about Pam Bondi's background
Speaker 1: before this. She is a legitimate lawyer, She was a
Speaker 1: legitimate prosecutor. She got a doctor jurists, if I'm not mistaken,
Speaker 1: like from a real university. She was the attorney general
Speaker 1: in Florida at one point in time, like she's she
Speaker 1: is a qualified to hold this position. But my god,
Speaker 1: she has dropped the ball, and not just with the
Speaker 1: Epstein situation but all of it. She is not doing good.
Speaker 1: And I understand that. You know, it's probably because she's
Speaker 1: being told what she does and doesn't need to do.
Speaker 1: But even a shred of integrity would go a long
Speaker 1: way here. I mean, I feel this anyway. And again,
Speaker 1: I don't know that Donnie t is guilty of any
Speaker 1: crimes as far as is concerned, but she absolutely did
Speaker 1: just get caught in a lie perjury because to say
Speaker 1: that there is zero evidence, even if that evidence is circumstantial,
Speaker 1: and can be explained away in all the things to
Speaker 1: say that there is zero evidence is a lie. Trump's
Speaker 1: name is mentioned a lot a lot in the DOJ
Speaker 1: files that have been released here. Yeah, it's a mess.
Speaker 1: It's a mess, Tony Midnight Calling. Either of y'all want
Speaker 1: to chime in? I would love to hear y'all two sins.
Speaker 4: Well, not much. I just would echo what you were saying.
Speaker 4: I didn't. I have not paid close enough attention to
Speaker 4: Epstein to be honest.
Speaker 1: That's fair. Okay, Midnight Call, you want to chime in
Speaker 1: on this one too? Brother? Are you good?
Speaker 4: I think I would just say, also, Massy is the
Speaker 4: best congressman we.
Speaker 1: Got, bro. I didn't know what to feel about Massy
Speaker 1: for a good while. Now I gotta say I fox
Speaker 1: with him. I like them, you know, Midnight Cang, what's
Speaker 1: your take?
Speaker 5: I'm good on all that?
Speaker 1: Fair enough? I got you anyway. I did just want
Speaker 1: to bring that up, the whole Pan Bondi situation. The
Speaker 1: House Judiciary Committee. They're frying her alive, y'all. It's not pretty.
Speaker 1: It's downright bad, and she is not doing much to
Speaker 1: really defend herself or her boss for lack of better words.
Speaker 1: But anyway, I also wanted to talk about this one.
Speaker 1: This happened in Italy. So masked gang blew the doors
Speaker 1: off of an armored truck in a dramatic Italian job
Speaker 1: style heist on a highway. Yeah. I don't know if
Speaker 1: I've seen the video of it. It is, uh, it's
Speaker 1: pretty insane. These dudes, who you would think are like
Speaker 1: super maybe former Special Forces or something like this. No, dude,
Speaker 1: these dudes look like mob bosses. They're like, each of
Speaker 1: them at least one hundred and fifty or two hundred
Speaker 1: pounds overweight, and they just decide they're gonna pull off
Speaker 1: the heist and blow the doors off of a normored
Speaker 1: car to steal some money, which you know, I gotta
Speaker 1: admire at least there. How can I put this their confidence?
Speaker 1: But you know, hey, so let's talk about it. Here.
Speaker 1: Masked arm robbers with AK forty seven's blew up an
Speaker 1: armored van on a motorway during a dramatic heist in Italy.
Speaker 1: Around half a dozen men wearing black ballaclavas and either
Speaker 1: all black outfits or white overalls emerged from cars surrounding
Speaker 1: the cash transporter in Puglia Puglia, I don't know. At
Speaker 1: eight am on Monday, an explosion blew the doors all
Speaker 1: and roof off of the van the owned owned by
Speaker 1: a security company by Tostoli, sending parts of the vehicle
Speaker 1: into the air engulfed in smoke. Traffic came to a
Speaker 1: standstill as motors traveling on the road between Lease and
Speaker 1: Brindisi looked on a driver heading towards the unfolding chaos.
Speaker 1: Film the blast and subsequent raid as it happened. Man, yeah,
Speaker 1: it was. It was pretty wild. So these dudes over here,
Speaker 1: this guy you could tell he's got a vesta on,
Speaker 1: and you can't really see it from this picture, but
Speaker 1: in the video I saw you could tell that he's
Speaker 1: wearing at least like a bullet bouncer. I don't even
Speaker 1: know if he's got plates in. I don't know if
Speaker 1: he was expecting the dudes to only have pistol rounds
Speaker 1: and so he'd be good. But like, the protective size
Speaker 1: of the chests and back are not the width that
Speaker 1: they need to be to cover the girth of our
Speaker 1: boy here. But anyway, apparently the heist went on and
Speaker 1: did not go. Oh well, we'll talk about it here
Speaker 1: in a minute, the bandits appeared to unload the van's
Speaker 1: contents into one of the cars, while at least one
Speaker 1: crouched behind another vehicle to keep watch. Italian media reported
Speaker 1: that some of the other cars caught up in the
Speaker 1: ambush were also robbed. So just random cars that were
Speaker 1: just standing by the explosion. Yeah, they just pointed a
Speaker 1: gun at them and made them take off their watching shit,
Speaker 1: their walllets, their purses, whatever. Though it is not yet
Speaker 1: clear how much money the gang ultimately got away with.
Speaker 1: A shootout ensued when police arrived on the scene, using
Speaker 1: vehicles for cover as the arm bandits opened fire. Pictures
Speaker 1: shared by Italian media showed one police car with bullet
Speaker 1: holes in the windshield right above the steering wheel. I
Speaker 1: don't know if Italians just don't have bulletproof windshields on
Speaker 1: their cop cars. That blows my mind. I mean, maybe
Speaker 1: it's a bulletproof like pistol rounds, not ak rounds, right
Speaker 1: seventy six, two y thirty nine or what in America
Speaker 1: we call three h eight, right, Yeah, stawing it out,
Speaker 1: So maybe you know that that wasn't rated for rifle rounds.
Speaker 1: I don't know. Moving on though, however, Despite the fracas,
Speaker 1: no injuries or fatalities were reported among the carabinieri who
Speaker 1: attended the scene. The Italian police said, yeah, that's another
Speaker 1: thing too. A full on gunfight ensued with machine guns
Speaker 1: and pistols and all this. Not one person was hit,
Speaker 1: Not one person was hit, not even wounded. But what
Speaker 1: are they They just like shooting into the sky just
Speaker 1: to make it sound like it's a big commotion. Nobody
Speaker 1: took a second to sight in anyway. The robbers fled,
Speaker 1: prompting a police chase followed by a man hunt in
Speaker 1: the countryside near the town of Squinzano. Two suspects were
Speaker 1: captured after trying to make their escape through a field
Speaker 1: after abandoning a white Alpha Romero Romeo. A second vehicle,
Speaker 1: a jeep, was found near the scene of the arrest,
Speaker 1: and at least two others remained at large. Italian news
Speaker 1: outlet sky TG twenty four reported that the bandits hailed
Speaker 1: from the Foggia area of Puglia, a region which ranked
Speaker 1: second in terms of attacks on armored vehicles. Around one
Speaker 1: point four billion pounds or one point six billion euros
Speaker 1: worth the valuables were stolen between the years of twenty
Speaker 1: nineteen and twenty twenty three. SAVIEP, a union for security guards,
Speaker 1: told The Times. Similarly, highway attacks have been recorded in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four, twenty twenty three and twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1: Investigations into the heightst are ongoing. So apparently armored car
Speaker 1: attacks are not that rare in this section of Italy.
Speaker 1: Who knew? Who knew? The mafia still had their shit
Speaker 1: going down in Italy proper, you know what I mean?
Speaker 1: I mean, hey, cosa Nostra man they out in them
Speaker 1: streets once again. The Carbonaria probably mispronounced it found themselves
Speaker 1: on the front lines of an extremely violent and organized
Speaker 1: criminal act. The Regional Secretary General of un ARMA, Nicola Magna,
Speaker 1: said on Sky's twenty four the fact that a patrol
Speaker 1: was hit by gunfire demonstrates the high levels of risk
Speaker 1: to which our officers are exposed on a daily basis.
Speaker 1: It is only thanks to the professionalism, composure and sense
Speaker 1: of duty of our colleagues that today we are not
Speaker 1: talking about a tragedy. Bro. They didn't hit a single guy.
Speaker 1: What are you talking about professionalism and composure? They can't
Speaker 1: hit the broad side of a barn. Apparently, I've seen
Speaker 1: the videos. These dudes are fat, and I don't mean
Speaker 1: just like a little. These boys were fat, and these
Speaker 1: dudes couldn't hit him. Yes, their professional and composed sense
Speaker 1: of duty, all them, all the things. Anyway, anyway, thinks
Speaker 1: that popping offinitively, I thought that was a hilarious take
Speaker 1: for lack of better words. I'm gonna check the chat
Speaker 1: and see what all we got over here, because I
Speaker 1: know Royce had sent something that we wanted to check out.
Speaker 1: Let's see what's been up ring camera super Bowl commercial?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, I didn't want to see that one.
Speaker 1: Hold on, hold on, We're gonna play that one in
Speaker 1: just a second. But I do want to see what
Speaker 1: else is going on with the rest of the chat.
Speaker 1: Our r I P James Vanderbeek.
Speaker 7: Creek Dawson's Creek Dawson no ship for years old? He
Speaker 7: had cancer?
Speaker 1: Oh wow? Okay, rip did James Vanderbeek? Was he actually
Speaker 1: cancers or was he on those Yeah?
Speaker 7: No, no, if you know, if you are if you
Speaker 7: see saw pictures of him, his face was very gaunt,
Speaker 7: so he definitely had some sort of cancer.
Speaker 1: Damn.
Speaker 5: I think he had colon cancer.
Speaker 1: Oh shit, Okay, that that that term was not the
Speaker 1: best place for this. But yeah, okay, that that does suck.
Speaker 1: R I P. James Vanderbeek. You you made daytime television
Speaker 1: a thing for you know, Jerry Sandusky, inn Is Sant
Speaker 1: we talked about that already. Super random, but what oh
Speaker 1: ravelingly that was? That was the thing earlier. Anyway, horrible shots, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I agree, Midnight call. That's insane. There was a full
Speaker 1: on gunfight and you're telling me none of these boys
Speaker 1: could hit these dudes they ain't no professional in them.
Speaker 1: That's that's ridiculousness. But whatever. Now, before we shot, before
Speaker 1: we started shooting this episode, Royce, our resident Jewish correspondent,
Speaker 1: did mention that the ring camera commercial from the Super
Speaker 1: Bowl is quite worrisome. I have not seen this yet
Speaker 1: sight unseen. So we're gonna watch this together and let's
Speaker 1: talk about it.
Speaker 5: Let's see.
Speaker 7: The one thing I will say is they laid it
Speaker 7: off to where this is a good thing. We want
Speaker 7: this to help you. That's hot, just f y how
Speaker 7: it's being set up. So I'm looking forward to hearing
Speaker 7: your take afterwards.
Speaker 1: I mean, that checks out right. So many people throughout
Speaker 1: the course of history I have handed over their freedoms for
Speaker 1: what they believe is security and it's not. But all right,
Speaker 1: let's check it out here. This is the Ring, the
Speaker 1: Ring company that does the Ring cameras for doorbells and shit,
Speaker 1: they're Super Bowl commercial. Let's check it out.
Speaker 4: My low, he's her family.
Speaker 8: But every year ten million go missing, and the way
Speaker 8: we look for them hasn't changed in years until now.
Speaker 8: One post of a dog's photo in the Ring app
Speaker 8: starts outdoor cameras looking for a match.
Speaker 1: Search Party from Ring uses.
Speaker 8: AI to help families find lost dogs. Since launch, more
Speaker 8: than a dog a day has been reunited with their family.
Speaker 8: Be a hero in your neighborhood with Search Party available
Speaker 8: to everyone for free right now, join the neighborhood at
Speaker 8: Ring dot com.
Speaker 1: Okay, and I will say that, Yeah, that annoys the
Speaker 1: fuck out of me because I get alerts in the
Speaker 1: middle of the night for the dumbest shit because of Ring.
Speaker 1: It's like lost dog, keep an eye out for this.
Speaker 1: It's like ten miles away the address where the dog
Speaker 1: went missing. Yeah, okay, whatever, fine, cool, something will go
Speaker 1: down and out of nowhere did anybody else hear that noise?
Speaker 6: What?
Speaker 1: And now I look, it's like okay, because I live
Speaker 1: in a relatively large neighborhood and I'm thinking, like, okay,
Speaker 1: maybe it's somebody like two streets over. No, it's like
Speaker 1: five miles away. Did I hear that? The fuck are
Speaker 1: you talking about, dude? So yeah, I'm yeah, of course.
Speaker 1: Now they're making rings seem like it's a good thing
Speaker 1: that they are linking in a network of all of
Speaker 1: their users so they can help you find dogs and
Speaker 1: things like that. Now, granted, there have been more than
Speaker 1: a few instances. We had a series of car break
Speaker 1: ins a couple of years back in this neighborhood. And
Speaker 1: when I say break ins, these I'm going to say teenagers,
Speaker 1: although I don't know that for a fact, because they
Speaker 1: were wearing masks and hoods and rubber gloves. They just
Speaker 1: went around and saw what cars were unlocked, and if
Speaker 1: the car was locked, they walked away. If it was unlocked,
Speaker 1: they went through and took a bunch of shit. I
Speaker 1: had neighbors that had guns stolen and wallets stolen and
Speaker 1: all these things. A lot of rain cameras were able
Speaker 1: to show who these people. I don't even know if
Speaker 1: they were actually caught. My guns don't stay in my car,
Speaker 1: they stay on my waist, but they a lot of
Speaker 1: people were able to take the ring footage and try
Speaker 1: to give it to police to at least give some
Speaker 1: sort of evidence chain. So there's pros and cons. But
Speaker 1: for the dog, dude, I mean, all right, if it
Speaker 1: does help people find their dogs, and that's sick. But
Speaker 1: I know it annoys the fuck out of me when
Speaker 1: it comes up like an amber alert almost on my
Speaker 1: phone and it's for some neighborhood five whole like not
Speaker 1: even streets, five neighborhoods away from mine, asking if anybody
Speaker 1: else just heard that loud boom, and it's like, it's
Speaker 1: probably somebody's spotlight hunting you. What do you want me
Speaker 1: to do?
Speaker 9: Yeah, anyway, So I guess I brought I guess I
Speaker 9: brought that up because it seems like it would just
Speaker 9: it could start with a dog, but more go to
Speaker 9: some what's gonna be next?
Speaker 7: I think that was my My thought process is if
Speaker 7: you're already integrating the AI to it to find something,
Speaker 7: so it's now getting better at its recognition, what's gonna
Speaker 7: happen when all right, well, we need this person found,
Speaker 7: you know, just a continuing of the whole eagle eye thing.
Speaker 1: Mm hmm, No, I could see it. I absolutely agree.
Speaker 1: Uh it's not a positive, it's an annoys the fuck
Speaker 1: out of me, honestly not. I'm wrong. Like I said,
Speaker 1: I want I want everybody to find their lost dogs
Speaker 1: here for that, but also not a big fan of
Speaker 1: having a Yeah, I like having security cameras on my property,
Speaker 1: but so hate that they're connected into a network with
Speaker 1: everyone else's. I don't see that as a positive.
Speaker 10: But yeah, anyway, Hey, they were trying to pass the
Speaker 10: law where I'm at, where if there were a crime
Speaker 10: a certain area, they could automatically take the footage from
Speaker 10: your ring camera without your permission.
Speaker 1: Oh no, So I don't think it.
Speaker 5: Went through, but they had talked about it.
Speaker 1: What area do you stay in?
Speaker 5: Oh, in Indianapolis area, Indiana?
Speaker 1: Oh shit, I mean I know that they got a
Speaker 1: pretty sizable amount of crime that takes place there. I
Speaker 1: get it, But dude, like not even letting you know
Speaker 1: that they're doing it, not subpoena and you are nothing
Speaker 1: basically saying, hey, we are taking the footage from your
Speaker 1: camera because we can. Yeah the fuck that?
Speaker 5: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Oh no, no, no, I didn't even think of that
Speaker 1: as an option. Is that something that other states have
Speaker 1: going on right now?
Speaker 5: I think they've got the ability to do it.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I don't like it, y'all. I do not
Speaker 1: like it because and to tie it back, not just
Speaker 1: for a conspiratorial take, but honestly, we do know that
Speaker 1: our phones are taking pictures of us and recording us
Speaker 1: at all times, and that's been confirmed by multiple executives
Speaker 1: of these companies. How many more steps are we away
Speaker 1: from them basically deciding that they are going to start
Speaker 1: pulling all of our shit from our phones because we
Speaker 1: happen to be in the vicinity of something that took
Speaker 1: place that may or may not have even had taken place.
Speaker 1: I feel like we're very We're not far off at all.
Speaker 1: We are. Oh, we're like two steps away from living
Speaker 1: under Big Brother real shit, and people have signed it
Speaker 1: over for the sakes of convenience, in security and all
Speaker 1: the other things that we do for, you know, the
Speaker 1: betterment of our community as it were. Anyway, I do
Speaker 1: appreciate y'all showing up and having some things to discuss
Speaker 1: with me on this episode. I'm not gonna stay too
Speaker 1: late tonight. You know, there's a lot going on in
Speaker 1: the news, but honestly, a lot of it is very
Speaker 1: Epstein centric and I didn't want to take too much
Speaker 1: time talking about that on The Cajun Night because we
Speaker 1: are going to be talking about that a lot more
Speaker 1: on the COLDA Conspiracy. Of course, there's earn an international
Speaker 1: news things going on, but the only things that are
Speaker 1: really standing out as far as the mainstream media is
Speaker 1: concerned as at this moment is the files. So this
Speaker 1: one was going to be kind of a lighter episode,
Speaker 1: but it is what it is. I want to thank
Speaker 1: everybody for joining me this evening once again. For anybody
Speaker 1: who would like to join us every Wednesday night at
Speaker 1: nine pm Central to be a part of the retinue,
Speaker 1: go to the link in the description below to patreon
Speaker 1: dot com slash Cajun Night. Only one tier for entry.
Speaker 1: We're just trying to grow this to be its own
Speaker 1: information sharing event every Wednesday night, nine pm Central. Once again, everybody,
Speaker 1: I am the Cajun Night, and as always, God bless