Speaker 1: I am a man who believed that I died twenty
Speaker 1: years ago, and I lived like a man who is
Speaker 1: dead already. I have no fear whatsoever of anybody or anything,
Speaker 1: Gary Webb.
Speaker 2: I am an investigative journalist can In nineteen ninety six,
Speaker 2: I wrote a series of stories in termed Dark Awaians,
Speaker 2: which was about cia En Dolment.
Speaker 3: I you, a man who wasn't sud Duck smiles at us.
Speaker 3: All all a man can do is smile back.
Speaker 4: Bothen stolen bone, the Secret Society.
Speaker 3: It's so sick that we can't talk about.
Speaker 4: What does that mean for American conspiracy theories are going
Speaker 4: to go?
Speaker 5: I haven't seen the number three two.
Speaker 3: My sad duty to report this afternoon that my friend
Speaker 3: and Colley sim Russell collapsed and died earlier this afternoon.
Speaker 6: I might die in this fell to night or in
Speaker 6: the area tomorrow.
Speaker 3: I'm afraid what possible difference can I make?
Speaker 5: And no official of my administration, whether his rank is
Speaker 5: high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words
Speaker 5: here tonight as an excuse to sense of the news,
Speaker 5: to stifle descent, to cover Obama stakes, or to withhold
Speaker 5: from the press and the public the facts they deserve
Speaker 5: to know.
Speaker 7: Hello, welcome back to your favorite live weekly call in conspiracy, political,
Speaker 7: parapolitical show, whatever, whatever terms you'd like to choose.
Speaker 3: Here.
Speaker 7: We have plenty to go through today, checking in on
Speaker 7: the the latest on the ball room, talking about all
Speaker 7: the different disclosure projects going on, seemingly all at once
Speaker 7: to sufficiently distract us all. And we'll continue our weekly
Speaker 7: you know, our weekly dive into Austin's autism.
Speaker 8: So this should be a fun one. I'm looking forward
Speaker 8: to it.
Speaker 7: Yes, yes, I before anyone says yes, hair's gone, I
Speaker 7: had to hit the reset button. I think it's good
Speaker 7: to do every now and then. But I'm ready to
Speaker 7: ready to hang out with all of you already dead heads,
Speaker 7: maybe a few dumpers. It's snuck in in the back,
Speaker 7: but we are looking forward to this. Hope to see
Speaker 7: some of you guys call in or maybe some of
Speaker 7: you non pores popping in the second segment of the show.
Speaker 7: But we have plenty to go through. But Austin, how's
Speaker 7: your week?
Speaker 9: Ben?
Speaker 8: We were talking before it kind of feels.
Speaker 7: A little bit like, almost like a lull week, although
Speaker 7: it sounds like they're working on the alien the alien
Speaker 7: stuff so maybe maybe that's why I phase that out.
Speaker 7: So to me, I'm kind of like, well, what's what's
Speaker 7: going on? There's not world shattering stuff going on, but
Speaker 7: they're trying to They're building up their little alien side
Speaker 7: bloot it seems like right now, So maybe that's what
Speaker 7: the perception going on there and I blank it out.
Speaker 7: So to me, nothing's going on. So what are your thoughts?
Speaker 7: Do you think is a lull week? What's going on?
Speaker 10: No?
Speaker 4: I completely understand that kind of instant reaction in a
Speaker 4: way because Bluebeam and the Disclosure Project kind of just
Speaker 4: brushes off my shoulder and my algorithm. But at the
Speaker 4: same time, whenever I do see it being centered in
Speaker 4: a real way, just sadistically set up to be weaponized.
Speaker 4: I think through the church and this this type of
Speaker 4: you know, dishonest framework, that will very much, I think
Speaker 4: more than likely convince too many people who are marching
Speaker 4: in lock step into embracing this agenda full force without
Speaker 4: any question whatsoever, if they can tie it in perfectly
Speaker 4: to their ideology, whatever that might might. You know, however
Speaker 4: that might need to be packaged right where it is
Speaker 4: palatable for them. I think that's technically happening in this
Speaker 4: very moment, and we're kind of getting all these warnings
Speaker 4: right from the usual suspects. But before we get into that, honestly,
Speaker 4: I feel like there's a few other things we could
Speaker 4: discuss first. And I'm experiencing something you might be able
Speaker 4: to call schitzo overload in a way, because Sam felt
Speaker 4: the same way that you did, and you know, I
Speaker 4: was kind of feeling that a similar sentiment as far
Speaker 4: as like over the weekend, and there wasn't really any
Speaker 4: you know, major media spotlight narratives being pushed from let's
Speaker 4: just say the most prominent kind of mouthpieces that was
Speaker 4: taking the spotlight right, It's seeming there was a few
Speaker 4: days where it was dying down. It wasn't quite as
Speaker 4: as demoralizing. They're probably staging the next major syop. But
Speaker 4: it's also about what you're choosing to pay attention to
Speaker 4: as well, because that definitely applies. And so many different
Speaker 4: people are just kind of interested, and you know, different
Speaker 4: areas of and avenues of research appeal to them more
Speaker 4: so than the others, right, And I think, yeah, it's
Speaker 4: just something that if I'm being honest, I mean, witnessing
Speaker 4: what Kim trail's being confirmed is real. Mk Ultru effectively
Speaker 4: never ended is now officially being confirmed. Directed energy weapons
Speaker 4: and weather warfare modification is officially being acknowledged as well.
Speaker 4: And I think it was I wrote it down blue
Speaker 4: Beam disclosure potentially getting the green light exactly what we're
Speaker 4: just describing, right, And so it is syop season in
Speaker 4: full bloom, like we were basically illustrating last week in
Speaker 4: a way, uh.
Speaker 7: By the way, quick aside on the directed energy weapons,
Speaker 7: I know we talked. I think last week we talked
Speaker 7: a little bit about my uh dive into the Steve
Speaker 7: Baker Ken Silva debate, and I'd totally forgotten because he's like,
Speaker 7: you know, Baker's one of these guys who's kind of
Speaker 7: had this distinct glow from him for on him for
Speaker 7: a while, and there's been a lot of different things,
Speaker 7: and I'm like kind of side eyed over and over.
Speaker 7: I totally forgot, but Ken reminded me, you know, speaking
Speaker 7: of directed energy weapons, one of the specific uh, one
Speaker 7: of the one of the many journalistic what the fucks
Speaker 7: that he did was he did an anonymous source on
Speaker 7: a directed energy weapon thing or something. I forget what
Speaker 7: the specific specifics in the story was but it literally
Speaker 7: was another anonymous source type thing. And oh I had
Speaker 7: a source in the room about something and they were
Speaker 7: talking about using directed energy weapons. I think maybe maybe
Speaker 7: in the Palisades fires. Maybe maybe it was some fire
Speaker 7: something or other. But any anyways, I just thought it
Speaker 7: was funny that literally, which fine, it's one thing if
Speaker 7: you have anonymous sources, but it's a it's it's one
Speaker 7: thing to use it as like the thing that kind
Speaker 7: of hold uphold your argument or if you're saying in
Speaker 7: a way like you expect it people to believe it.
Speaker 7: Like it's one thing that you're like, hey, I can't
Speaker 7: out my source is what I have. I feel like
Speaker 7: I have to tell you. But you know, take it
Speaker 7: as far as you can, being that it's an anonymous source.
Speaker 7: But no, this motherfucker just keeps throwing these things out.
Speaker 7: But anyways, back to what you were saying, I just
Speaker 7: thought it was funny that that that's one of these
Speaker 7: things if we're speaking about Glowey's director, like.
Speaker 8: I think there might be directing it.
Speaker 7: There probably are director energy weapons, but it's also it
Speaker 7: kind of falls in the realm of Glowey.
Speaker 11: Shit.
Speaker 7: You know what, I mean, like, this is sort of
Speaker 7: stuff that the journalists, that the establishment journalists may push
Speaker 7: out in this sort of way occasionally to kind of
Speaker 7: lean into the disclosure stuff.
Speaker 4: Definitely. I just think it's interesting how because I did.
Speaker 4: I was kind of looking at the scientists going missing
Speaker 4: and you know, these strange, suspicious circumstances involving their deaths
Speaker 4: and things of that nature. I just kind of saw
Speaker 4: it as a syop and that was a limited hangout
Speaker 4: and at a certain level that they would basically exploit,
Speaker 4: right to layer in various kind of agenda items to
Speaker 4: fall into place in a certain pattern that would be
Speaker 4: appealing to various individuals on that political spectrum. And it
Speaker 4: did seem like it. And I still kind of think
Speaker 4: there's something to that right as far as like potentially
Speaker 4: being the reality. But I will say, whenever you actually
Speaker 4: have UFO linked scientists claimed a top secret energy weapon
Speaker 4: blasted her before her death, Now the Pentagon admits that
Speaker 4: they actually exist, and these are our official publications running
Speaker 4: with these headlines, Like I think it was the Daily
Speaker 4: Mail specifically that ran that headline. But it's just hilarious
Speaker 4: whenever all of these things that used to be taboo
Speaker 4: once upon a time that we were never allowed to
Speaker 4: take seriously without losing credibility is now simultaneously being confirmed
Speaker 4: before our eyes and also you know, weaponized and leveraged
Speaker 4: against us in that very way. It's a similar pattern
Speaker 4: that I see strategically, you know, kind of relied upon.
Speaker 4: But yeah, I don't know. I'm just very skeptical of
Speaker 4: it all. I'm trying to remain centered and as objective
Speaker 4: as possible. As much as I have my preconceived notions
Speaker 4: and my bias, I'm looking to confirm at a certain level.
Speaker 4: I have to be honest about that much, right, And
Speaker 4: I think that's a part of this the moralization cycle
Speaker 4: that we're currently in, is they hope to essentially get
Speaker 4: you to latch on to the most cartoonish versions of
Speaker 4: these conspiracy theories, like we mentioned last week, so they
Speaker 4: can easily discredit you, put you in a group, put
Speaker 4: you in a camp that will you know, essentially allow
Speaker 4: people to not take you seriously moving forward, And you
Speaker 4: know that's always unfortunate. So you have to remain measured
Speaker 4: and composed in those moments and not fall into the traps.
Speaker 4: But I did see in terms of Cole Thomas Allen, Right,
Speaker 4: our strange Patsy from the White House Correspondence dinner shooting,
Speaker 4: which I can believe there's a world in which I
Speaker 4: could believe that this man was motivated strictly by ideology
Speaker 4: and and you know, essentially showed up and and yeah,
Speaker 4: it's it's a very real possibility. But I also am
Speaker 4: am entirely open to considering some sort of Mancharin candidate
Speaker 4: scenario where it's it's just because it did almost look
Speaker 4: as if when he walks into the storage room with
Speaker 4: his trench coat, as as the canine unit from the
Speaker 4: Secret Service agent follows him suspiciously into that room, only
Speaker 4: to be pulled back instantly for him to just afterward
Speaker 4: right sprint out of the room and go through the screener.
Speaker 4: And and yeah, the obvious lack of I mean, we
Speaker 4: can into that, but it's just the fact that you
Speaker 4: see the security agents react and talk about lack of
Speaker 4: situational awareness. Let alone, I mean, I'm sorry, but you're firing,
Speaker 4: You're discharging your weapon toward toward your fellow Secret Service agents.
Speaker 12: Right.
Speaker 4: Actually, it's just I feel like, you know, a little
Speaker 4: bit more dangerous than I would have imagined as far
Speaker 4: as just being in the line of duty with your
Speaker 4: fellow agent right in that moment. Yeah, it looks like
Speaker 4: your your life is is much more threatened by your homie,
Speaker 4: apparently if you working with the Secret Service, which kind
Speaker 4: of fits if you remember the very first African American
Speaker 4: Secret Service agent that that JFK actually placed on the
Speaker 4: Secret Service team, it was because this he met him
Speaker 4: in Chicago, if you remember, he took like a remember
Speaker 4: the Chicago plot, the original assassination plot. They had one
Speaker 4: on Miami, and they had one in Chicago leading up
Speaker 4: to is the green Light Go Dallas scenario, And essentially
Speaker 4: there was an African American, like I forget what his
Speaker 4: role was at the time, because I remember he was
Speaker 4: actually lower level Secret Service detail, I believe. And then
Speaker 4: he when he actually met JFK, when he went to
Speaker 4: the bathroom, he like walked down a flight of stairs.
Speaker 4: He was strategically positioned to be out of the way
Speaker 4: so he would never actually get to meet the president.
Speaker 4: But JFK had to use the bathroom, and so he
Speaker 4: just so happened to walk down this flat of stairs
Speaker 4: and meet the only African American. You know, I can't
Speaker 4: recall if he was already Secret Service detail. But I
Speaker 4: remember he's working security at the event, and this is
Speaker 4: basically when JFK gives him this kind of he asked
Speaker 4: his name, they have a conversation, and he gets him
Speaker 4: promoted right, and inevitably it leads to his forced false
Speaker 4: conviction that they, the Secret Service themselves, set them up
Speaker 4: on these trumped up charges that never existed, claiming that
Speaker 4: he was basically, you know, I think it was trafficking
Speaker 4: drugs at some level rights and in reality, these were
Speaker 4: like criminal informants that were trying to get time off
Speaker 4: their sentence and were already in prison, and so they
Speaker 4: did a deal with the Secret Service to essentially make
Speaker 4: up false charges against this man to falsely incriminate him,
Speaker 4: and then he was tortured in solitary confinement. I forget
Speaker 4: which institution. Anyway, this is entirely off not story though
Speaker 4: we're going to talk about. Yeah, but the whole point
Speaker 4: that I brought it up is, you know, because clearly
Speaker 4: you know this go this is nothing new as far
Speaker 4: as like a long standing kind of threat that the
Speaker 4: Secret Service is this old boys network in a real way,
Speaker 4: and you're not going to infiltrate that group right without
Speaker 4: being compromised anyway. So what I thought was strange is
Speaker 4: that Cole Thomas Allen right the Assassin's manifest though we
Speaker 4: were discussing how they were attempting to conflate the Manifesto
Speaker 4: with anyone that essentially is online in the digital space
Speaker 4: right making similar claims just about the permanent establishment in
Speaker 4: many ways, and as if you might as well be
Speaker 4: you know, Lee Harvey Oswald, like they said right back
Speaker 4: in the day with the Warrant Commission report labeling you
Speaker 4: as a conspiracy theorist for a pejorative they could wild
Speaker 4: against us. But the Manifesto, it wasn't just Mark Levin
Speaker 4: coming out with this war against the First Amendment and
Speaker 4: banning everyone you know in the digital space who shares
Speaker 4: any sort of similar opinion, but you have I think
Speaker 4: it was Caroline leave it right. She comes out and
Speaker 4: she says she compares the would be manifest Assassin's Manifesto
Speaker 4: to everyday rhetoric on social media if you haven't looked
Speaker 4: into NSPM seven basically, which is this National Security Presidential Memorandum.
Speaker 4: It's given the title Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence,
Speaker 4: And this is I think a part of right what
Speaker 4: is the project esther right, which which I think is
Speaker 4: just an extension of utilizing anti Semitism, as we said,
Speaker 4: as the justification you know, many times in the past,
Speaker 4: so that I already do see being conflated with Cole
Speaker 4: Thomas Allen and this ridiculous emotion arousing violent falls flag
Speaker 4: that was the correspondence in a shooting. So anyway, I
Speaker 4: thought that was fascinating. But do you want me to
Speaker 4: pull up the Canine Unit video though? And we can
Speaker 4: kind of.
Speaker 8: I have them set up in the private chat.
Speaker 7: I think my internet's being a little goofy today, so
Speaker 7: I put them in there for us. But yeah, I
Speaker 7: figured we could look through. I mean, yeah, this whole thing,
Speaker 7: this whole you know, scenario is weird. I mean yeah,
Speaker 7: I'm trying.
Speaker 8: To be objective.
Speaker 7: I think it's ridiculous to really jump to one side
Speaker 7: or the other of the narrative here. I mean, we
Speaker 7: see a lot of people, even some of more of
Speaker 7: the rapid or maybe not repidble some more of the
Speaker 7: ones that you'd think maybe more hip with it are
Speaker 7: kind of pooh poohing the idea of anyone wh would
Speaker 7: say this could be faked in any way. I mean
Speaker 7: it's I will grant it's nothing but vibes. There's nothing
Speaker 7: substantive other than just straight vibes. And it's like, but
Speaker 7: it's so over the top, it's like, come on, but
Speaker 7: it's you know, on the flip side. So I'm trying
Speaker 7: to be agnostic and follow where things go. We talked
Speaker 7: a little bit last week. We looked at some I
Speaker 7: believe we may have played the security footage last week.
Speaker 7: I can't remember if not. I definitely did on the
Speaker 7: Dump a couple times, but there's been since then. New
Speaker 7: cleaned up versions were dropped because I think it was
Speaker 7: Trump himself on like It's true, Social initially dropped that
Speaker 7: one little quick clip with grainy as shit, and you
Speaker 7: really couldn't make out. It literally just looked like he was,
Speaker 7: you know, you know, kicking up into almost full gear
Speaker 7: ready to make it into full on Naruto run. Didn't
Speaker 7: look like he had a gun in hand. But now
Speaker 7: we have a cleaned up version. I actually have a
Speaker 7: couple of different angles. I have a second one. We
Speaker 7: can go into that really kind of display that does
Speaker 7: look like perhaps he was concealing some sort of weapon.
Speaker 7: I know there were like talks about, you know, for
Speaker 7: him perhaps putting together some sort of it looks like
Speaker 7: he may not even need to put together, may have
Speaker 7: just straight up had it under his jacket.
Speaker 8: But I mean we can get through all that. We can.
Speaker 7: Let's go ahead, and if you want, bring up that
Speaker 7: first one and we can go through it. It's a
Speaker 7: little bit longer, but yeah, I mean once it happens,
Speaker 7: it happens, it's pretty quick.
Speaker 4: So but so does this include the portion where beforehand
Speaker 4: you see him on the surveillance video walking into the yeah,
Speaker 4: into like the workout room and and and things that. Yeah,
Speaker 4: very straight top left hand corner.
Speaker 8: You gotta really look closely for it.
Speaker 4: Okay, It's interesting behavior though, to say the least, right
Speaker 4: as far as h if you're considering, because I'm wondering,
Speaker 4: is it actually real time the one that the clip
Speaker 4: that you have, because many of them have been sped up,
Speaker 4: and I think, okay, because it's it's interesting to consider,
Speaker 4: like how much time was he actually spending in that
Speaker 4: workout facility and and uh, you know, he obviously didn't
Speaker 4: do much of anything. He just kind of looked around
Speaker 4: for a minute, walked around a couple of different areas,
Speaker 4: and right, it was.
Speaker 8: Just in and out.
Speaker 7: Really, if you watched the videos just in and out,
Speaker 7: it's literally we'll see that in a second, because that.
Speaker 4: Seem like it was that quick, But that was actually
Speaker 4: three hundred times sped up right from the original version
Speaker 4: of the security surveillance tapes. So that made me wonder, like,
Speaker 4: how much time did he actually spend in uh while
Speaker 4: he was even uh because you saw him walk back
Speaker 4: down the hall and then he comes back and you
Speaker 4: see him in the trench coat finally, and that must
Speaker 4: have been when he actually had the weapon assembled under
Speaker 4: his trench coade as you mentioned, if you you'd seen
Speaker 4: that footage, not entirely sure. I would like to see
Speaker 4: that part of the footage because am I supposed to
Speaker 4: bring it up? Is that what you're at?
Speaker 8: That's as I thought you were going to trying I'm
Speaker 8: trying to hold Jacob.
Speaker 4: I was so confused. I'm sorry.
Speaker 7: That's that's that's fair, that makes sense. So like are
Speaker 7: we just are we just? Are we stallid to bring
Speaker 7: up the clock? I got it, I'm running dry, okay, cool,
Speaker 7: I have yeah.
Speaker 4: I have a clip that's that's worth watching. It's very
Speaker 4: strange and this seems like it's actually uh you know again,
Speaker 4: I have.
Speaker 7: Them by the way, I have them in the private chat.
Speaker 7: If you go into the private chat, I put them
Speaker 7: in order to and and the thing, so I have
Speaker 7: the link. But that is this looks like the one
Speaker 7: that you're about to show me. This looks like the one.
Speaker 7: We can we can watch this one though I've already
Speaker 7: seen this. This is the one where you can make
Speaker 7: out the clearly the weapons. This would be good to
Speaker 7: look at too, I guess, but maybe even better to
Speaker 7: watch before the other one. By the a phone lines
Speaker 7: are open one eight three three seven to two dead
Speaker 7: or that is one eight three three seven two two
Speaker 7: waiting for the scroll to go over because I always
Speaker 7: forget the love of the numbers.
Speaker 8: Was a three?
Speaker 2: Uh?
Speaker 13: It was it?
Speaker 8: Three three two three? Yeah, there you go, I got it.
Speaker 7: One eight three three seven two two three three two
Speaker 7: three call in if you if you want to shoot
Speaker 7: the shit with us. We're probably gonna close those phone
Speaker 7: lines about halfway through the episode.
Speaker 8: Jacob's can be leaving us.
Speaker 7: But yeah, we can go and play this because yeah,
Speaker 7: this is where you can definitely make out he's clearly concealing. Oh, well,
Speaker 7: maybe I'm wrong because I think it's the same hallway though,
Speaker 7: because I've actually seen this where he's coming from other ways.
Speaker 8: Maybe this is him earlier in the day.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's him earlier in the day, as he enters
Speaker 4: the workout room you know, in the the Hilton Hotel
Speaker 4: itself is and he just yeah, again it's sped up, right,
Speaker 4: So you're not quite certain. I think they claim as
Speaker 4: approximately three minutes. I could see that, right, uh, if
Speaker 4: it was sped up to that extent. And then yeah,
Speaker 4: a little while lay you see him passing back by
Speaker 4: with his trench coat on. But in this clip, I
Speaker 4: didn't see any weapon that seemed to be protruding in
Speaker 4: an obvious way. And that's essentially when he walks directly
Speaker 4: to this storage unit, you know, the storage closet or whatever.
Speaker 4: They claimed it was a makeshift storage room, but it
Speaker 4: looks like it's an official storage room in my opinion,
Speaker 4: and as he walks in, clearly you see and I
Speaker 4: think there's a better video of this, give me one second,
Speaker 4: because that video is actually it highlights it and kind
Speaker 4: of spotlights it and zooms in a little bit more.
Speaker 4: And I do think that's a little bit worthwhile, even though.
Speaker 8: It's the first link I dropped in the in the chat,
Speaker 8: if you're looking for that one.
Speaker 4: Okay, well I had a book mark two.
Speaker 8: Probably I'm sorry, that's the exact one too.
Speaker 4: Okay, cool, cool this one even yeah, exactly, And this
Speaker 4: is just obviously strange behavior at face value.
Speaker 8: One thing I do want to point out, real quick notice.
Speaker 7: One thing I guess to give a little bit more
Speaker 7: of a well, I still think this is fucking ridiculous
Speaker 7: because he's on a different floor and he's about to
Speaker 7: charge through. I mean, I'm not a spoiler, but he's
Speaker 7: about to charge through now. I thinking if I was
Speaker 7: to try to give this some sort of like, if
Speaker 7: you were determined to do this, these are security checkpoints.
Speaker 7: It's a metal detector right there. They're breaking it down.
Speaker 7: So my what I'm thinking is perhaps this is like
Speaker 7: the last stop before, like to get to the event,
Speaker 7: if you were trying to get so, so the idea
Speaker 7: being in his head, he's like, we see this guy
Speaker 7: right here who actually just you know, it looks like
Speaker 7: the dog clocked him, which I think some dogs can
Speaker 7: smell guns gunpowder, so you know, he actually clocked him twice.
Speaker 7: If you pay attention closely, like he pulls the dog
Speaker 7: back and the dog goes right back, and so like
Speaker 7: maybe to give some level of like trying to understand
Speaker 7: he he maybe maybe he was even in the moment.
Speaker 7: Maybe this isn't one plan. Maybe he's just casually walking through.
Speaker 7: He's like, all right, now's go time. Maybe he's retarded.
Speaker 7: He didn't realize there were these, you know, metal attectors
Speaker 7: or whatever. As he's going he sees, oh shit, he
Speaker 7: sees security guy. He kind of does to slick, try
Speaker 7: to maybe go off into another room, and he sees like, shit,
Speaker 7: this is the last moment. I can't, Like, you're not
Speaker 7: gonna be able to get past the metal detectors with
Speaker 7: a bulky gun under your fucking trench coat. Like if
Speaker 7: you're gonna do it, I guess this would be go time.
Speaker 7: Although even still, even if this is your go time,
Speaker 7: like I'm sorry, you're not sprinting. This isn't a fucking anime.
Speaker 7: You're not sprinting through you know, ten plus security or
Speaker 7: you know, uh a secret service and then going you know,
Speaker 7: I can don't know if it's up or down a floor,
Speaker 7: but either way, you're not gonna charge through and then
Speaker 7: make it somehow then get through that, get to the
Speaker 7: other floor, get whatever, through whatever obstacles you gotta get
Speaker 7: through to get inside the main event. Like that's it's
Speaker 7: just so so ridiculous that it's just like unbelievable.
Speaker 8: So but but that's the only thing.
Speaker 7: I guess this would kind of be the last call,
Speaker 7: like this would be unless he has some other crazy
Speaker 7: like plan like this is as far as he can
Speaker 7: go without how having to be like Leroy Jenkins this ship.
Speaker 13: Mm hmmm.
Speaker 8: So that's even then, it's still retarded.
Speaker 4: Right, and this footage right here as far as just
Speaker 4: he actually runs through, Okay, watch this. It's just to
Speaker 4: me the way you see the individual agent on this
Speaker 4: side that is obviously not in the footage at this point, Uh,
Speaker 4: he fires three times, at least it looked like three times.
Speaker 4: Legitimately he discharged his weapon directly toward his fellow agents,
Speaker 4: which I just thought was ridiculous. So here we go.
Speaker 4: I think it's slowed down in this in this point
Speaker 4: or at this point in the video. Yeah, so he
Speaker 4: instantly fires, I believe right after he comes through, because
Speaker 4: because uh, it looks as if the individual Cole Allen himself.
Speaker 4: Did he potentially even fire while he ran through the
Speaker 4: just after he ran through the screener?
Speaker 7: I mean, if so, it to be off screen if
Speaker 7: he did, because I mean there's no way, I mean
Speaker 7: unless you like accidentally finger on the trigger or something.
Speaker 7: But he's just bolting like he was going so fast
Speaker 7: the first time we watched this was greening. I didn't
Speaker 7: think it had a weapon in hand because he was moving,
Speaker 7: you know, seemingly unreasonably fast for that.
Speaker 8: So but but.
Speaker 4: Right here you can clearly tell that this individual is
Speaker 4: firing right on the bottom left of the screen. Yeah,
Speaker 4: you can eat a positive And it's three different times.
Speaker 8: Shit, yeah, pointed towards the crowd of the back left
Speaker 8: that as he moves to the words of.
Speaker 4: Guy there, right, there's three times another right there, and
Speaker 4: then a third time they actually discharged their web. So
Speaker 4: I thought that this individual agent potentially actually is that
Speaker 4: the person that got shot in their uh what's it
Speaker 4: called in their vest right and their bulletproof vest. I
Speaker 4: don't know.
Speaker 8: Yeah, he does kind of look back a little, he did.
Speaker 7: I mean, that could have just been a footing thing,
Speaker 7: but it did kind of I can see what you mean.
Speaker 8: Yeah, right, I was need either.
Speaker 7: Way, even if even if he was the guy responsible
Speaker 7: for he literally one time shoots into a crowd of
Speaker 7: like five people, and the other time shoots like then
Speaker 7: the other time is like a guy five feet away
Speaker 7: from him that he shot.
Speaker 4: It's so crazy for this, I mean, for you to
Speaker 4: discharge your weapon at this close of a distance, you know,
Speaker 4: completely aware of the fact that that your fellow agents
Speaker 4: are that obviously where they are situationally, there's no way
Speaker 4: in which you could imagine a world where they're not
Speaker 4: professionally kind of uh, I don't know trained for this
Speaker 4: type of uh uh. Trained.
Speaker 7: Maybe they're trained to shoot center mass at their homies.
Speaker 7: Maybe maybe that's.
Speaker 4: Apparently that's exactly what they're trying to do.
Speaker 8: Because they know they're very bulletproof.
Speaker 4: That's one hundred percent what that person did. And they
Speaker 4: again three separate times, which in its own right is
Speaker 4: a clearer example of of kind of how on a
Speaker 4: impressive these people really are. And I don't really think
Speaker 4: that this thin veil of protection people believe they can
Speaker 4: rely on. Yeah, it's far more than than you would
Speaker 4: like to imagine. And and that's just something I think
Speaker 4: we might as well acknowledged by this point, But there
Speaker 4: was one video as well that was before all of this.
Speaker 4: It was a Fox War reporter that redirected the canine
Speaker 4: from essentially from the crowd right before the Trump shooting.
Speaker 4: And had I hadn't seen people actually, you know, address this,
Speaker 4: to be honest, and I did think it was strange
Speaker 4: and worthwhile and pointing out. But again, you you have
Speaker 4: this Fox War reporter running over and redirecting the canine unit,
Speaker 4: which is the exact same canine unit that would obviously
Speaker 4: followed the suspicious perpetrator, who would be Cole Thomas Allen. Yeah,
Speaker 4: And so that in itself is very very strange, And
Speaker 4: again I think it's a part of this that is
Speaker 4: worth layering into the overall scope of what exactly happened,
Speaker 4: just to try and get a better understanding, because again
Speaker 4: it's it's hard to make heads or tails of how
Speaker 4: this operation went live, but I can, I can legitimately
Speaker 4: see just the possibility of this person just being kind
Speaker 4: of arranged and placed into the proper position for this
Speaker 4: to go to go live right effectively, and and otherwise
Speaker 4: it's it's hard to believe that the security is that lacks,
Speaker 4: is that unconcerned, especially considering the prior assassination attempts, which
Speaker 4: we in my mind I'm far more on I would say,
Speaker 4: kind of leaning toward the conclusion of it being a
Speaker 4: staged event entirely, and especially the Thomas Crooks shooting and
Speaker 4: Ryan Routh's story in its own right is hard to
Speaker 4: believe just at face value if you go through the
Speaker 4: alleged official narrative. I mean, so, why wouldn't this fit
Speaker 4: as much as it's confirming bias, as much as there's
Speaker 4: clearly a reaction happening and people are vehemently opposed to
Speaker 4: Trump in the current administration, And you see this the
Speaker 4: May Day protests right playing out, which happened over the weekend.
Speaker 4: I believe in. And I think Brad actually went and
Speaker 4: attended one in Georgia, and and he went under cover
Speaker 4: as and yeah, he said he had to actually act
Speaker 4: like a gay dude to have people interact with him
Speaker 4: and take him seriously. It was, Yeah, I know, that's
Speaker 4: what I'm just kidding. If you watch this, Brad, I'm
Speaker 4: not saying you're feminine.
Speaker 7: It was.
Speaker 4: This is a dumb bat I could ad miss it.
Speaker 7: But Austin, if you like magic, I mean, we're we're
Speaker 7: kind of talking about I think I believe a little
Speaker 7: bit of a magic trick here. Perhaps if you think
Speaker 7: it's faked. I mean, I know everyone think it's crazy.
Speaker 7: Magic isn't real, But I don't know that. I don't
Speaker 7: I don't even think that that's the entirety of the
Speaker 7: magic act. It goes on everyone's The immediate talking point
Speaker 7: became the ballroom, well the things when this first started,
Speaker 7: A lot of people may not recall this because this
Speaker 7: was kind of like a whatever when it first started.
Speaker 7: The ballroom idea, the idea of doing a ballroom, I mean,
Speaker 7: a lot of people were like perhaps appalled, but those
Speaker 7: were more people who are weird, like establishment nerds were
Speaker 7: the ones who were appalled, Like, how dare you impune
Speaker 7: the whatever of the White House with this gaudy you know,
Speaker 7: Epstein esthetic whatever.
Speaker 8: You know, a lot of people were upset about that.
Speaker 7: But it was kind of coming from this like gay
Speaker 7: kind of limprested, like because the reason being is his
Speaker 7: whole Like supposedly, according to Trump, this is gonna be
Speaker 7: privately funded by the homies.
Speaker 8: This was gonna be privately funded. They're gonna do it now.
Speaker 7: Now, I will admit there was a substantive angle there
Speaker 7: for people being like, whoa, whoa, whoa whoa. Now what
Speaker 7: does that mean if we're talking about this like thing
Speaker 7: that's going to exist for basically forever in the United States,
Speaker 7: And you can be someone who's like, oh, I'm a
Speaker 7: I would you know, the Pritzkers could be like, you
Speaker 7: know what, I'm going to donate three million dollars and
Speaker 7: you're going to put all the napkins with decorative things
Speaker 7: with my name or whatever on them. There's a concern
Speaker 7: about corruption. Obviously a little bit of pay to play.
Speaker 7: It kind of comes off of well, now there's all
Speaker 7: sorts of reasons for concern because it has now gone
Speaker 7: from two hundred million being funded by you know, some
Speaker 7: rich homies to scratch that is a billion by taxpayer dollars.
Speaker 8: This is the current a billion. As you could see
Speaker 8: right here. Here's the thing.
Speaker 7: A billion dollars says in addition to amounts, in addition
Speaker 7: to amounts otherwise available, there is appropriate to the United
Speaker 7: States Secret Service for fiscal year twenty twenty six, out
Speaker 7: of any of the money in the treasury not otherwise appropriate,
Speaker 7: one million or one billion dollars to remain available until
Speaker 7: September thirtieth, twenty twenty nine, for the purposes of security
Speaker 7: adjustments and upgrades, including within the perimeter fence of the
Speaker 7: White House compound, and support enhancements by the United States
Speaker 7: Secret Service relating to the East Wing Modernization project, including
Speaker 7: above ground and blow ground security features. Now, to be fair,
Speaker 7: I think this is a bill they're trying to push
Speaker 7: right now, so I don't know if it's actually gone
Speaker 7: through or anything so like, but either way, this is
Speaker 7: how things have shifted.
Speaker 8: One little note on this before we shift on.
Speaker 7: I do think I accidentally kind of stumbled upon this
Speaker 7: little nugget because I just for funzies on my morning
Speaker 7: dumb show.
Speaker 8: I usually like to do start off with icebreak or stuff.
Speaker 7: Something a little more fun, goofy, and we'd for I
Speaker 7: did a segment on Trump's Weird Weekend and we went
Speaker 7: into some of the crazy true socials he was dropping
Speaker 7: well apparently because he was doing some weird boomer Ai tweets.
Speaker 8: It was just kind of funny.
Speaker 7: But digging through that, I come to find out apparently
Speaker 7: he had been posting a bunch about the reflecting pool
Speaker 7: over you know, in front of the Washington Monument. I
Speaker 7: guess he wants to put some sort of almost sounds
Speaker 7: kind of tacky to me.
Speaker 8: I don't know.
Speaker 7: It's hard to know until you actually see it executed,
Speaker 7: but it sounds like a pretty tacky, like blue pool
Speaker 7: liner he wants to put in the reflecting pool, which
Speaker 7: I'm sure will become some sort of construction boondoggle, you know.
Speaker 8: Money out watering operation.
Speaker 7: But just right after all those posts, I think it
Speaker 7: was like a you know, within a day or so after,
Speaker 7: someone went and defaced the reflecting pool, Like I forget
Speaker 7: the specifics of where they did it, but I guess
Speaker 7: they I don't know if they fucked up the current
Speaker 7: liner or whatever the hell's in there, and they put
Speaker 7: eighty six forty seven all over the place, which ties
Speaker 7: into the latest in the Komy The Komy the Komy storyline.
Speaker 7: For those who give a shit about that, for the
Speaker 7: two goals of the world, go, oh my god, they're
Speaker 7: gonna fucking get him, which, don't get me wrong. To
Speaker 7: be clear, James Comy should be in fucking jail, But uh,
Speaker 7: do I think that Trump adminstration is gonna do that?
Speaker 5: No?
Speaker 8: But if for those aren't.
Speaker 7: Aware, heally did like seashells at some posts of eighty
Speaker 7: six forty seven, which and everyone's saying that one hundred
Speaker 7: percent must mean he's making a call to kill the president,
Speaker 7: which I mean, I guess I'm open to it, but
Speaker 7: it seems a little bit of a ridiculous conclusion. But
Speaker 7: either way, it's just kind of it's weird. We keep
Speaker 7: seeing this, we see this, We're seeing this trend. It
Speaker 7: almost seems like, if I were a little cynical, it
Speaker 7: almost seems like falls flagging for uh money lautering operations perhaps,
Speaker 7: I mean it sounds crazy, but I mean people forget
Speaker 7: the mafia exists, and the Trump was balls deep in
Speaker 7: construction stuff and that is kind of their mo is
Speaker 7: like getting these you know, construction projects, And I mean,
Speaker 7: I need to really get into the weeds of this
Speaker 7: story because there's other there's all sorts of I guess
Speaker 7: construction stuff going on in DC that apparently a lot
Speaker 7: of people are reporting are way over valued to a
Speaker 7: criminal level. So uh but anyways, we do have a caller.
Speaker 7: I don't know if you have anything on that, Austin.
Speaker 7: I mean, I could easily wrap up our topic.
Speaker 4: I just saw a clip of call me himself acknowledging
Speaker 4: the fact that that's essentially what he meant right when
Speaker 4: he posted that. And so it's out there. It's very
Speaker 4: clear and obvious. And I think that in its own
Speaker 4: right is being kind of exploited and weaponized in a way, right,
Speaker 4: just for the narrative value and how they can sew
Speaker 4: the vision utilizing that concept. But yeah, and I think
Speaker 4: it was Lindsay Graham. I might have mentioned it last
Speaker 4: week that he had came out with that statement about
Speaker 4: the White House ballroom and introducing a bill that would
Speaker 4: effectively authorize four hundred million dollars in US taxpayer money
Speaker 4: essentially to finance the construction of the ballroom. So and
Speaker 4: it looked I think in the quote he said something
Speaker 4: about how it I don't think he addressed national security,
Speaker 4: but he said a lot of military stuff or something.
Speaker 4: It was very unimpressive quote, but claiming it would be
Speaker 4: better for the country in itself if it was constructed, obviously,
Speaker 4: but not surprised that now it's a billion his own
Speaker 4: only point I was making.
Speaker 7: So, all right, we got this caller with us, Jacob
Speaker 7: who we got on the line.
Speaker 14: Yeah, so we uh, we have Brandon on the line,
Speaker 14: but before we get there, I just wanted to let
Speaker 14: you know that there's just a slight delay. So but
Speaker 14: with that said, Brandon, go ahead. You are good to go, Bud.
Speaker 4: Brandon.
Speaker 15: Hey, guys, how are you doing?
Speaker 4: Good?
Speaker 8: Good? What you got caller?
Speaker 7: We'll have to there is a delay, so we'll have
Speaker 7: to say your piece, say your question. Then we'll have
Speaker 7: to let you go, so we don't be stepping on
Speaker 7: each other. But appreciate your call.
Speaker 15: Yep, it's raining here, that's why. So I just wanted
Speaker 15: to say I went on vacation to Boston this weekend,
Speaker 15: and I took two different tours. We did, like the
Speaker 15: Freedom Trail where you go to pack up call Revere Road.
Speaker 15: And I asked this for a guy who was a
Speaker 15: high school history teacher. You ever heard of the Society
Speaker 15: of Cincinnati hadn't. And then later in the day, the
Speaker 15: super normy guide, who was like super odd, super smart,
Speaker 15: was just he was at one of these historic churches
Speaker 15: where all this fun deliberty met and they're all members
Speaker 15: of the Saint Andrew's Lodge of Freemasons, of which John
Speaker 15: Hancock was the master Mason, and it's very interesting history.
Speaker 15: But the second guy told me that if George Washington
Speaker 15: wasn't a member of the Society of the Cincinnati, then
Speaker 15: they would have gone full on death stop mode and
Speaker 15: just made a diplomat like diplomat, like a fascist ruler
Speaker 15: instead of a president.
Speaker 13: So it was Washington.
Speaker 15: Who put a camper on that through the Society of Cincinnati.
Speaker 15: So I just wanted to share that back.
Speaker 4: Interesting.
Speaker 8: I do appreciate that.
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 7: I'm a big hoppying guy though, so it may have
Speaker 7: actually been better had we had had a king or
Speaker 7: but it sounds like you might be describing something a
Speaker 7: little bit differently. So how do you think democracy is
Speaker 7: a god that failed? I ultimately prefer anarchy, but I
Speaker 7: do think a king is probably preferable to this nonsensical
Speaker 7: democracy concept we have.
Speaker 8: But I appreciate you calling caller.
Speaker 7: I think we might get into some spooky alien disclosure
Speaker 7: territory before we skidatle onto the patrons and hang out
Speaker 7: with you fine fellows. But we'll call in again whenever
Speaker 7: you have some more questions or interesting info like that. Yeah,
Speaker 7: I guess that I'd like to see some more in that.
Speaker 7: That's a that's interesting.
Speaker 8: I don't know.
Speaker 7: I don't know if this almost sounds like that could
Speaker 7: be some Paul Bunyan stuff to give Washington some ups.
Speaker 8: But I don't know. It's believable, I guess.
Speaker 7: But yeah, Austin, we we talked about you talked about
Speaker 7: we were talking about the pre show. We were talking
Speaker 7: about about how the the church they were they seemingly
Speaker 7: are trying to utilize that for the New Disclosure Project.
Speaker 7: We all this alien stuff going on, and I don't
Speaker 7: know how to. I hadn't pieced that together yet, because let's
Speaker 7: be real, me and you, we've delved to like the
Speaker 7: teal world, and they've been trying to make this and
Speaker 7: it just feel like if you look around in the
Speaker 7: zeitgeys certain areas, it's almost like they're trying to make
Speaker 7: that happen. But maybe it's just been so shit that
Speaker 7: it's just like maybe that's why I haven't picked up
Speaker 7: on it. It just like it's been so overt, so
Speaker 7: ridiculous that I'm like, even though I'm not religious, but
Speaker 7: I grew up religious, and I just I guess I
Speaker 7: have enough trust in my you know, my uh in uh,
Speaker 7: you know, the Christians of the world coming from that
Speaker 7: realm that like they look at this and go.
Speaker 8: What the fuck is this literal homo talking about?
Speaker 15: Right?
Speaker 7: But I guess that seems like that's the way they
Speaker 7: want to go with it. They're really trying to meld
Speaker 7: the which I guess maybe this could be some blue
Speaker 7: Beam type stuff. I mean maybe, I mean, I guess
Speaker 7: they're kind of running out of tricks to divert from
Speaker 7: the Iran war, so maybe they maybe we don't have
Speaker 7: to maybe have to yank out the old blue Beam.
Speaker 8: It would be kind of funny if I do.
Speaker 7: It would be funny if we end up in this
Speaker 7: dystopian future where like the garment is so functional that
Speaker 7: they're yanking out these like grand plans as minor distractions
Speaker 7: and kind of like blowing their load early. If you
Speaker 7: catch my drift, like, ah shit, well, I guess we
Speaker 7: gotta do the alien thing. We weren't quite ready for it,
Speaker 7: and then it just kind of is like a like
Speaker 7: kind of fizzles out.
Speaker 8: But I don't know. You you you said you've delved it.
Speaker 8: You were looking into that a little bit.
Speaker 7: This is an angle that you think there might be
Speaker 7: something to that that the religious side things there, that's
Speaker 7: what's gonna be ushers in this, Uh, I guess this
Speaker 7: Blue Beam era that it looks like they're really trying
Speaker 7: to get us ready for I mean, as we've kind
Speaker 7: of started beginning.
Speaker 8: To show though, like we just don't fucking care.
Speaker 7: Like, I mean, it's interesting that they're trying to do this,
Speaker 7: but I mean so far as like no one gives
Speaker 7: a shit about that, Like no one really gases over
Speaker 7: four bucks a gallon. I mean, you're probably like I
Speaker 7: wish because I know you're very highly but I mean
Speaker 7: people like you're like, oh, aliens are there? Was like
Speaker 7: fuck off, Like I no one gives a shit about aliens.
Speaker 7: But they're still gonna try to make it work. They're
Speaker 7: somehow gonna get all these poor conservative Christians that are
Speaker 7: struggling to pay for gas to somehow care about aliens.
Speaker 7: But what are your thoughts and all that. Do you
Speaker 7: think they're going to be successful. I don't think so,
Speaker 7: but I mean they're try for sure.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I think that it will definitely manufacture consent in
Speaker 4: terms of the narrative they're shaping for public opinion in
Speaker 4: a certain way that will be inevitably embraced by various
Speaker 4: subgroups within the culture of modern society, especially in the
Speaker 4: West who are kind of like I feel like they're
Speaker 4: lying in wait for this sort of pattern recognition to
Speaker 4: fall into the trap. Is what essentially I see happening,
Speaker 4: and what I called it. I don't know if I
Speaker 4: said it exactly in this way in the past, but
Speaker 4: it's essentially the new wage esoteric and technocratic ideological system
Speaker 4: of control, right, is really what it seems like is
Speaker 4: fundamentally being engineered, and it's really Bluebeam being framed as
Speaker 4: a holy war versus interdimensional demons, which pair seamlessly with
Speaker 4: the Orthodoxy. I guess you could say of the New
Speaker 4: Age religion that's been facilitating this manufactured false prophecy which
Speaker 4: is perfectly in tandem with the Zionist project, and how
Speaker 4: much they intend on kind of, you know, limiting the
Speaker 4: the context of what the average individual in the in
Speaker 4: the West, how they can kind of even engage at
Speaker 4: the surface level of much of this in terms of
Speaker 4: the interpretation and digesting a lot of these these concepts,
Speaker 4: and especially if you're talking about philosophy and tune with
Speaker 4: a potential prophecy, then I think they've infused themselves with
Speaker 4: this very kind of underhanded strategic concept of undermining the
Speaker 4: intellectual capacity of the average American, a specially the average
Speaker 4: American Christian, which I think has been heavily kind of
Speaker 4: targeted in this very concept, especially by the Zionist project
Speaker 4: as well, playing into this so many different people. I
Speaker 4: think you have generations of people who are essentially not
Speaker 4: only not only looking forward to the rapture ensuing in
Speaker 4: their lifetime, because I think the closer you get to
Speaker 4: your own personal demise, right physically speaking, then the more
Speaker 4: you hope for a divine intervention where you won't have
Speaker 4: to actually go through the latter years of your life
Speaker 4: and endure the kind of natural consequences right of the
Speaker 4: end stages of the physical form on this plane, right,
Speaker 4: which is essentially the way that I look at it.
Speaker 4: But so again, it's it's facilitating this manufacturer of false
Speaker 4: prophecy I think, intended to further consolidate and centralized power,
Speaker 4: where as always while simultaneously ushering in this dystopian and
Speaker 4: newly branded project Stargate which we've talked about many times,
Speaker 4: which is clearly the AI infrastructure project, which is effectively
Speaker 4: streamlining and siloing many different subgroups into this long desire
Speaker 4: totalitarian technocratic state which I think is quickly becoming a
Speaker 4: preordained outcome, and all of these overreaching KYC know your
Speaker 4: customer protocols are only the early stages in first phase,
Speaker 4: if you will, of this digital authoritarian gulag, which I
Speaker 4: think is being effectively formed around us at the very
Speaker 4: present moment. So that is the way I look at
Speaker 4: this potentially, you know, playing out as far as them
Speaker 4: wielding the church as a vessel for the disclosure project
Speaker 4: and agenda at large, and that will only bring in
Speaker 4: to fold so many individuals who unfortunately are kind of
Speaker 4: as I mentioned before, they're primed and ready to embrace
Speaker 4: much of this concept all as it stands. And so
Speaker 4: and you mentioned Peter til by the way, my god man,
Speaker 4: did I did I tell you personally? I think I
Speaker 4: told Jacob, But there was there was this dialogue back
Speaker 4: and forth between Teal and Epstein where they have an
Speaker 4: exchange basically Teal's giving him advice after the press first
Speaker 4: reported his crimes, right his sinister you know, sex trafficking crimes.
Speaker 4: And this is what he said, quote verbatim, Peter til
Speaker 4: to Jeffrey Epstein. I do hope you're holding up well
Speaker 4: and that the cycle won't go much further. Do you
Speaker 4: have any sense on whether this press cycle is going
Speaker 4: to keep escalating? It would be good to compare notes
Speaker 4: at some point on strategies on this sort of stuff.
Speaker 4: So it's just like the implications of that. I think there's.
Speaker 7: Another I think there's another email where he even says like, oh,
Speaker 7: I don't care about those sort of things, like repond
Speaker 7: that even then even furthermore, there's another email where I
Speaker 7: think I think it's Teal. I think it's Teal too Epstein,
Speaker 7: or it's Epstein to Teal, but it's like, that was fun,
Speaker 7: see you again in three weeks or whatever.
Speaker 4: Huh.
Speaker 7: And I think if you look deeper, I think there
Speaker 7: was some context that implies like there were previous emails
Speaker 7: implying the date of that one or something, and so
Speaker 7: it looks like what they were referring to wasn't already
Speaker 7: in a range meeting at the island, so like kind
Speaker 7: of confirming that the the one that you know, all
Speaker 7: your favorite influencers don't seem to want to name unless
Speaker 7: you have really cool favorite influencers like me and Austin
Speaker 7: this is but pretty much anyone of note, it seems
Speaker 7: is like huh, what oh deeal. I mean, like, I
Speaker 7: guess I kind of don't like, but somebody's gonna do it.
Speaker 7: Somebody's gonna rape us with the robots, So may as
Speaker 7: well be Peter Teal, someone who says he's sort of
Speaker 7: a libertarian or something, which.
Speaker 4: Which you know, new age antichrist. Right, that this is
Speaker 4: a concept that is also fusing together that that strange.
Speaker 4: It's it's the blurring of of that thin line between
Speaker 4: religion and politics that they're playing. But they're trying to
Speaker 4: usher in a new age concept that younger generations will
Speaker 4: be willing to effectively consider. And I think, you know,
Speaker 4: just mentioning the influencer industrial complex and kind of the
Speaker 4: influence that Peter Teel and his acolytes have had on
Speaker 4: this space, it's it's undeniable. And I mean, honestly, ask yourself,
Speaker 4: how many of you truly think this podcasting space isn't
Speaker 4: entirely filled with CIA or intelligence operatives trying to essentially
Speaker 4: not only influence you, but shape just entirely shape public
Speaker 4: opinion in general. I think this is a real concept
Speaker 4: that's being relied upon, and it's something that is again,
Speaker 4: this is why you have to remain skeptical and have
Speaker 4: have no more heroes, and not put individuals on a
Speaker 4: pedestal unless they've legitimately UH at the very least value,
Speaker 4: you know, the core concept of confirming right through through
Speaker 4: evidentiary process of providing a substantiated evidence that that is
Speaker 4: is UH in a real way corroborated. But any anyway,
Speaker 4: what's up, Jacob?
Speaker 8: Another caller?
Speaker 4: Yah?
Speaker 8: Yeah, by the way, well, we'll probably go to intermission
Speaker 8: after this.
Speaker 13: UH.
Speaker 8: Do you see a couple of super jets.
Speaker 7: Maybe we'll dress those before we go to break and
Speaker 7: then don't let me forget Austin. I definitely want to
Speaker 7: get more into the to UH as we talked about
Speaker 7: before the.
Speaker 8: Wormhood wormwood wormhole.
Speaker 7: We'll dig a little bit into that, but we'll do
Speaker 7: that after the intermission disclosure.
Speaker 4: I definitely have a couple of final points on that,
Speaker 4: just to wrap it up. But yeah, I'm totally.
Speaker 8: Never not after a mission.
Speaker 7: After the caller, we'll try to get intermission.
Speaker 8: Du caller, what's up?
Speaker 14: Yeah, so we we actually have Will on the line.
Speaker 14: There's there's a slight delay, but it's less than before.
Speaker 14: But Will you are good to go?
Speaker 4: Bud?
Speaker 13: Hey, oh, heyo, they go for it.
Speaker 8: Brother.
Speaker 13: Okay.
Speaker 2: So I don't know about you guys, but it seems
Speaker 2: like we're all exhausted from like this ship that we
Speaker 2: can pretty much see through. Is this bullshit And my
Speaker 2: biggest problem is Okay, so they say that, you know,
Speaker 2: they cannot create, they can only copy, which I truly
Speaker 2: believe that, and it's it's like they're playing from the
Speaker 2: same playbook, but they can't come up with new plays.
Speaker 2: So I just don't see how this is all going
Speaker 2: to work out. I mean, the only thing I can
Speaker 2: think of was I've seen a narrative through sci fi
Speaker 2: and fantasy where they convince people that other people are
Speaker 2: an alien enemy, and so they get people to fight
Speaker 2: each other. And I mean, you know, there's plenty of
Speaker 2: cell towns that we know vibration and frequency. If you
Speaker 2: can hit that tone, you can have a mass psychosis
Speaker 2: pollucination people bug out. But again, it's just like everything
Speaker 2: they do is just so fake and gay, and maybe,
Speaker 2: like you know, the extremest believers might buy into it,
Speaker 2: but most people, I know, they don't can trust anything.
Speaker 2: I don't know. I just don't have space that their
Speaker 2: production value is going to be good. Enough to convince me.
Speaker 8: Yeah, you're right on it.
Speaker 13: Brother.
Speaker 7: All Right, well we're gonna let you go. That's a
Speaker 7: great question. Appreciate you calling in, but yeah, I definitely
Speaker 7: he said it really good there where you're like they
Speaker 7: have the same place and you're kind of obviously adapted.
Speaker 7: I mean, this is why it's good to like find
Speaker 7: something to cut your teeth on and then kind of
Speaker 7: go from there. Like Oklahoma City bombing was the thing
Speaker 7: for me. Then once you kind of start seeing those
Speaker 7: same same things being played out, you can kind of
Speaker 7: play it up. But another thing, even like coming from
Speaker 7: my you know, I started out as like more of
Speaker 7: a theory show, and we mentioned earlier democracy the god
Speaker 7: that failed. One concept they bring up and there quite
Speaker 7: frequently is a high time preference and low time preference,
Speaker 7: like essentially the ability the idea of like being willing
Speaker 7: to defer in defer enjoyment or something like that, you know,
Speaker 7: an easy way to describe like planning a garden or
Speaker 7: something as opposed to you know, consuming everything else at once.
Speaker 7: You're deferring the enjoyment or whatever. I'm using the wrong
Speaker 7: term there, but you're deferring it to later and theoretically,
Speaker 7: it's like because you're willing to wait, it's better. But
Speaker 7: with a democracy, essentially it's like the h it's a
Speaker 7: high time preference thing. And so as it continues to deteriorate,
Speaker 7: the high time preference, you know, the preference keeps raising.
Speaker 7: So it's a high time preference. Essentially, they are no
Speaker 7: longer willing to defer, you know, it's things are more important.
Speaker 7: This is why things like people always talk about was
Speaker 7: it terms your church limits, and it's like, yeah, that's
Speaker 7: not gonna make a difference, because if you lower the term,
Speaker 7: you're actually raising the high time preference. Because essentially everyone
Speaker 7: these politicians, you know, during the period of time they're
Speaker 7: in office, that's their their period of time they can
Speaker 7: loot people legally, right, and so it's like if you
Speaker 7: shorten that period, essentially you're just escalating the you know,
Speaker 7: the degree to which they're going to try to steal
Speaker 7: from you. And that same concept I think plies within
Speaker 7: the conspiracy world as well, where like they're playing the
Speaker 7: same place, they're playing them over again. They're just continually
Speaker 7: kicking the can down the road. It's just that like
Speaker 7: as they're doing it, they're not able to the can
Speaker 7: keeps getting know there they're keep it's like they're getting
Speaker 7: worn out or something like. The can continually is like
Speaker 7: can't be it, it can't kick it as far like
Speaker 7: at some point the bill is gonna come do? And
Speaker 7: is that gonna be our generation? Is that gonna be
Speaker 7: the next generation? How is that gonna look? I mean
Speaker 7: eventually things have to go back, you know, like if
Speaker 7: you're you're putting your finger on the in the scale,
Speaker 7: you know, you artific artificially shifting things about. Eventually the
Speaker 7: truth comes home to roost. And you know, if you
Speaker 7: have an economy built on quicksand or lies, you know
Speaker 7: that your your whole establishment's built on lies. Eventually those
Speaker 7: things are gonna kind of straighten out. The market will provide.
Speaker 4: That's kind of Trump's net worth, right, His value was
Speaker 4: was essentially just it's skyrocketed over the course of this
Speaker 4: current administration, obviously, which is always just the pattern that repeats, right,
Speaker 4: It's it's nothing new, but talking about term limits, he
Speaker 4: just triggered everyone's Trump arrangement syndrome again, obviously discussing I
Speaker 4: forget what statement he or what the setting was when
Speaker 4: he was actually giving this public statement. I can't recall
Speaker 4: now it was it was some sort of gathering where
Speaker 4: it was at the White House, but it was it
Speaker 4: wasn't just press that that was there. Anyway. He basically
Speaker 4: mentions that eight or nine years from now when he's
Speaker 4: out of office, right and in a brief and passing statement,
Speaker 4: which is obviously just him in jest, kind of trolling,
Speaker 4: you know, in a way, is what it seemed like
Speaker 4: as far as the context of the statement. But the
Speaker 4: fact that he like alluded to obviously him serving eight
Speaker 4: or nine years more essentially before actually being removed from office,
Speaker 4: I just thought it was hilarious because again, I've been
Speaker 4: stating the fact that they could legitimately use his administration
Speaker 4: as kind of a precedent setting opportunity, you know, I
Speaker 4: just legitimately always believe that's on the table, and the
Speaker 4: dystopian level in which the structured government in itself has
Speaker 4: kind of evolved over time, it's because they utilize each
Speaker 4: you know, administration and for that very purpose right to
Speaker 4: essentially exploit that opportunity and I think restructure the current
Speaker 4: system and power paradigm in a way that will be
Speaker 4: come more dystopian. And that's the entire point that I'm
Speaker 4: making is that if we think term limits are going
Speaker 4: to inevitably be shortened, I would imagine a world where
Speaker 4: term limits are almost entirely removed. Right, if we're considering
Speaker 4: the concept of allowable opinion being pushed in the most
Speaker 4: totalitarian direction, then this is something that many different Trump
Speaker 4: supporters would actually get behind. If you can believe it
Speaker 4: even in the current moment, then it's fascinating to imagine.
Speaker 4: But that's the level of you know, it's not just
Speaker 4: the populist aspect of his candidacy, it's legitimately this sort
Speaker 4: of right wing god king type of I would say,
Speaker 4: manufactured personality that he's embraced and then perpetuated into put
Speaker 4: into the public right as far as the way in
Speaker 4: which he's he's kind of presenting himself since he he
Speaker 4: he became a Republican after he was very much a
Speaker 4: Democrat for lifelong Democrat, which is always the case, right.
Speaker 4: These people have no loyalties whatsoever, and the two party
Speaker 4: system is a delusion. So anyway, that's my only point
Speaker 4: on the term limits. I think it's hilarious and people
Speaker 4: actually take them seriously in the first place.
Speaker 7: Yeah, I would say on the term limits thing though
Speaker 7: like a h my high time preference point. What they're
Speaker 7: doing right now is like they kind of get to
Speaker 7: play both. So like they are floating out the idea
Speaker 7: so that like of another term, which I highly doubt
Speaker 7: that'll be a thing, but it kind of gives us illusion, Yeah,
Speaker 7: it gives us illusion of campaigning later. So it kind
Speaker 7: of shifts the current paradigm of this as opposed to
Speaker 7: a final term president. It's a which you know, typically
Speaker 7: woul make you think, oh, it's just all you know,
Speaker 7: you don't have to worry about establishment, you don't have
Speaker 7: to worry about campaigning. Whereas so now it's a different paradigm,
Speaker 7: so they get to play off that. Meanwhile, they're robbing
Speaker 7: the treasury blind and if you say, somehow magically they
Speaker 7: can somehow, you know, pull off another one, which perhaps
Speaker 7: I'm you know, perhaps they can, then whatever, and they
Speaker 7: just got to repeat all over again, and then they
Speaker 7: got to go back into full on high time preference,
Speaker 7: probably even worse in the next one. But Jacob, is
Speaker 7: that the same caller did I actually we actually cut
Speaker 7: him off afraid more to say, yeah.
Speaker 14: He had one one more quick thing to say and
Speaker 14: he was he was good to go, So go ahead.
Speaker 8: Will you?
Speaker 2: Okay? So we all know these actors, which a terrible actor,
Speaker 2: all in these gay ass the cult secret societies, and.
Speaker 13: They always fall.
Speaker 2: They always have like that. Uh it's like legal leads
Speaker 2: to the nth degree that they have to follow. And
Speaker 2: I think that you know, they do all their cult
Speaker 2: rituals by their whatever astrology, and I think you've gotten
Speaker 2: to a point where it's either passed or it's coming up,
Speaker 2: and they're just pushing it and they're getting sloppy. But
Speaker 2: then also, we never I don't think any you can
Speaker 2: say before whatever reset, We've never had so much propaganda
Speaker 2: and access to information. So personally, I just think, yeah,
Speaker 2: they're getting sloppy headlines coming up which they have to
Speaker 2: follow over for whatever reason. And I don't know, I
Speaker 2: feel like it's gonna fizzle.
Speaker 13: Yep.
Speaker 8: I agree.
Speaker 7: Uh, well, I don't really have much add to that, Austin,
Speaker 7: I don't know if you do. There was a but
Speaker 7: appreciate you calling in, brother. I think we're gonna finish
Speaker 7: off our Hell yeah, brother challing again, give us some
Speaker 7: more questions, more stuff to riff off of. Appreciate the
Speaker 7: support but yeah, Austin, we want to talk a little
Speaker 7: bit more about disclosure before we skidadle off to intermission.
Speaker 4: Uh, you're tele intermission because I actually have to go
Speaker 4: to the bathroom. If you're.
Speaker 7: All right, fuck it, let's just go, Jacob, go ahead,
Speaker 7: roll that beautiful being actually real quick. I do want
Speaker 7: to address a couple. We have a couple of super chats,
Speaker 7: so someone's giving us money. Once again, I'm never sure
Speaker 7: which one of this is going to but either way,
Speaker 7: whether it's supporting me and you're supporting Austin, they're supporting us.
Speaker 7: All the rising tide raises all ships and give a
Speaker 7: big shout out for the support we have. Dno Comeplizziert
Speaker 7: says ten bucks each for some cold Heineken beers. Thanks
Speaker 7: for what you do, Jay and a you guys rock
Speaker 7: Slash are very.
Speaker 8: Frightening at the same time, and then you also have.
Speaker 7: I don't know what these emojis are supposed to be
Speaker 7: another ten fifty one I think euros, so I think
Speaker 7: that's somewhere like twenty bucks benea two of them. So
Speaker 7: I appreciate the support. I appreciate that.
Speaker 4: One thing I could say, just before we take the intermission,
Speaker 4: and it won't take me long at all to tie
Speaker 4: off that disclosure real quick.
Speaker 7: Actually, last one, blessings all of this community and show
Speaker 7: from program to Jill and the appreciate it.
Speaker 4: But thank you for sure. But I forgot to mention
Speaker 4: when we're discussing cold Hamas Allen right, the alleged perpetrator
Speaker 4: who's responsible for I think what was he charged with?
Speaker 4: Attempting to assassinate the president and two weapons charges. But
Speaker 4: what I thought was crazy is that I went further into,
Speaker 4: you know, probing a few different articles that were effectively
Speaker 4: kind of a tempting to provide the details of his
Speaker 4: personal life leading up to the event, which obviously is
Speaker 4: very cryptic. It's not entirely well detailed in any real
Speaker 4: way to feel like you have enough of a perfect
Speaker 4: window into what potentially led up to this, obviously, but
Speaker 4: the point being is that he had so he's twenty
Speaker 4: seventeen graduate of the highly selective California Institute of Technology. Instantly,
Speaker 4: I think, okay, James Holmes, you know, like, let's take it,
Speaker 4: take it easy. You know, I'm surprised he didn't actually
Speaker 4: dye his hair red orange rights so anyway, won't get
Speaker 4: into that, but he was working as a teacher at
Speaker 4: the time of his arrest, obviously also developing a computer
Speaker 4: games apparent, and he did develop one specific computer game
Speaker 4: in twenty nineteen, after registering a domain name boredom bohr
Speaker 4: dom for a game he created and released on Steam,
Speaker 4: which is just basically the PC Steam Library database archive
Speaker 4: for video games. It's described as a skill based, nonviolent
Speaker 4: asymmetrical fighting game loosely derived from a chemistry model that
Speaker 4: is itself loosely based on reality. This is the quote
Speaker 4: that he himself described this game as so. In twenty
Speaker 4: twenty five, he apparently receives his master's degree in computer
Speaker 4: science from California State University at Domingo's Diminga's Hills. While
Speaker 4: he's a student at Caltech, he was also a member
Speaker 4: of the school's Christian Fellowship in the NERF Club, which
Speaker 4: I thought very strange, right like for this person to
Speaker 4: have allegedly embraced this very progressive ideology in a way,
Speaker 4: seemingly being a member of this Christian fellowship and NERF
Speaker 4: club as well. But the Christian Fellowship is what caught
Speaker 4: my attention. So he's featured apparently as well in a
Speaker 4: twenty seventeen photo posted by the school on Facebook following
Speaker 4: his graduation, which I think has gone a little bit
Speaker 4: viral after the event. But he's holding a picture of
Speaker 4: himself as a child with a stuffed rabbit. What's going
Speaker 4: on with all this strange imagery and symbolism involved with
Speaker 4: many of these different perpetrators where ments believe, you know,
Speaker 4: fundamentally engaged in this in an organic, right and authentic way.
Speaker 4: I don't know. It's difficult. And there's there's one last
Speaker 4: final point that I thought I had to share with you,
Speaker 4: which is he apparently was named in December twenty twenty
Speaker 4: four while this is a private tutoring service C two
Speaker 4: Education that named Alan as the teacher of the month
Speaker 4: that month. He described himself as a mechanical engineer, computer
Speaker 4: scientist by degree, independent game developer by experience, teacher by birth.
Speaker 4: That's what he said personally. He lists his causes on
Speaker 4: the profile as science and technology. So the most interesting
Speaker 4: part was basically not the anti Trump manifesto, which you
Speaker 4: know even in the manifesto itself it's anti Christian, right,
Speaker 4: Why is he a member of the Christian fellowship at school?
Speaker 4: In university right at an actual collegiate level. He's still
Speaker 4: in the Christian fellowship at school. I just it doesn't
Speaker 4: fit right. This is pattern recognition, And instantly I'm saying, okay, Sorahan. Soorahan,
Speaker 4: who went into the pantry like a robotic assassin, who
Speaker 4: was following out his and acting out his programming just
Speaker 4: to be in the right place at the right time.
Speaker 4: Maybe this individual and they've effectively sophisticated the programming to
Speaker 4: such a level to where it makes a lot more
Speaker 4: sense how he actually traveled to his destination right to
Speaker 4: actually end up at the Hilton Hotel. He took various
Speaker 4: means of you know, he wasn't just flying. It's very strange,
Speaker 4: and it seems like, again, why would you go through
Speaker 4: these the jump through these hoops, you know, when it's unnecessary.
Speaker 4: So that that was a major point that stuck with me,
Speaker 4: and and then the final one being that essentially there
Speaker 4: is there are witness accounts from the neighborhood where he
Speaker 4: was staying at with his parents, because again he's apparently
Speaker 4: living with his parents although he's a college graduate, he's
Speaker 4: a teacher at the time. I don't know, I guess
Speaker 4: I could see this in Los Angeles where where it's
Speaker 4: just too difficult to have a house at this point,
Speaker 4: he's not married, whatever he's.
Speaker 8: I think he had like a master's too, so maybe
Speaker 8: he was still going through his schooling, so maybe that
Speaker 8: had somebody with him living at home. I don't know. Also,
Speaker 8: you know, to.
Speaker 4: Be on me, right, it could but here's the part
Speaker 4: that really stood out to me, and it could be
Speaker 4: nothing once again, right, which we always have to consider,
Speaker 4: is the reality of this, as much as I want
Speaker 4: to imagine this is a kind of a glaring, potential
Speaker 4: problematic right layer to this story. But he lived in
Speaker 4: a community surrounded by quote lots of retired Los Angeles
Speaker 4: Police Police Department officials. So you know, Los Angeles is
Speaker 4: a very large place, metropolitan area. It's you know, spread out,
Speaker 4: and it's just a little bit difficult. I would like
Speaker 4: to know more about his father's background, because his mother
Speaker 4: apparently was a teacher. But the point is is that apparently,
Speaker 4: again this is over represented community, specifically in Torrance, where
Speaker 4: his family's home was that he was staying at all
Speaker 4: around him are basically LAPD officers, which if you consider,
Speaker 4: you know, what was the Projeck operation Chaos right. You
Speaker 4: remember Patty Hurst, You remember the shootouts with the SLA
Speaker 4: where the house gets legitimately wacoed, Right, I mean they
Speaker 4: fucking set it up like a pot belly stove, right,
Speaker 4: That's essentially what it was described as, just like waco uh.
Speaker 4: And and those incendiary charges were essentially proven to have
Speaker 4: been used on that on that private home in Los
Speaker 4: Angeles where the shootout happened, and this major fire bomb
Speaker 4: took place, that took out an entire city block. Basically,
Speaker 4: it's insane. They had CIA operatives infiltrated in with the
Speaker 4: l A p D. So who knows lots of lots
Speaker 4: of retired LA LA pole According to a neighbor, not
Speaker 4: just one neighbor, but many different neighbors that knew the
Speaker 4: family but didn't know Cole Allen apparently. Anyway, that's the
Speaker 4: final point. But I felt like I had to tell
Speaker 4: you because it was kind of extraordinary to me. And
Speaker 4: if you try and put all these pieces together in
Speaker 4: a in a kind of an arranged portrait of of
Speaker 4: what played out, it becomes more and more difficult to
Speaker 4: a task to imagine this wasn't somehow orchestrated to have
Speaker 4: happened at the very least allowed to have taken place right,
Speaker 4: and that's just how I feel.
Speaker 7: I mean, criminal incompetency at the absolute, very least unbelievable degree,
Speaker 7: but lots to figure out still pretty early on in
Speaker 7: all of the information flowing from there. So I'm sure
Speaker 7: we'll have more on this in the future. But let's
Speaker 7: go and roll that beautiful bean footage. We'll hang out
Speaker 7: with the patrons, the non pores after the intermission. We
Speaker 7: got we got a few callers ready to come in.
Speaker 7: We got our resident expert and anti Semitism that'll be
Speaker 7: joining us. I'm looking forward to that. Hopefully he's able
Speaker 7: to squeeze in in his work break. But with that, Jacob,
Speaker 7: go ahead and play that beautiful bean footage. We'll see
Speaker 7: you guys here in a few minutes. Enjoy this shit.
Speaker 9: Ah so fair got fa so.
Speaker 6: W W I got fight shots? I say yet shot.
Speaker 10: Try es got t fall show blocks rum cow try
Speaker 10: Dick said fire las w rock on two y jo
Speaker 10: last foul shall see you got white well stack? Tell
Speaker 10: my why you watch why say yes? I can watch
Speaker 10: her joking a loud story way side guy can watch
Speaker 10: her live?
Speaker 9: What was shin?
Speaker 4: Was? I?
Speaker 6: Ya right?
Speaker 9: What was man?
Speaker 6: W shigne? Was a yall? Light?
Speaker 15: Was shot?
Speaker 5: Was I?
Speaker 6: Yall right?
Speaker 9: Was shign?
Speaker 15: Was I?
Speaker 6: Y'all right?
Speaker 9: Y'all?
Speaker 6: I John sid outside? Yes, yeah, I say the w
Speaker 6: Why watch all right? John? Watch all? I say? I
Speaker 6: watch go alway?
Speaker 15: John Way?
Speaker 9: Is all?
Speaker 6: I say? All right? Now watch all?
Speaker 9: I say, all right?
Speaker 6: Don't watch all?
Speaker 9: I ja? Yeah?
Speaker 6: I say what a watch? So I WI? Why said? Wait?
Speaker 9: Go ok?
Speaker 8: M all right, we're back. Let's go ahead and get
Speaker 8: some patrons up in this.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 8: Let's uh, let's get Jared up here. Let me see. Uh,
Speaker 8: let's see if he's still there. Jared, we're bringing you on. Uh,
Speaker 8: here we go. Brother, what's up? My friend?
Speaker 7: Glad to Oh? I have face revealed. I don't think
Speaker 7: I've ever seen your face. That's that's quite the beard.
Speaker 9: I love it.
Speaker 8: What's up?
Speaker 13: How you doing? Gentleman?
Speaker 12: Part of the uh sparked up his vehicle and got
Speaker 12: allowed a set of monthers. But long story short, I
Speaker 12: wanted to call in and give an update on Brandon
Speaker 12: Taylor Moore, the Canadian charged with hate speech and improper
Speaker 12: storage of firearm. I have a friend who's and correspondence
Speaker 12: with him. As his phone number. He has a gag order,
Speaker 12: so he can't be on social media right now. But
Speaker 12: long story short, the people were trying to bring the
Speaker 12: case up against him had shocked around for your for
Speaker 12: judges because the initial judge that they had went to
Speaker 12: had turned down.
Speaker 13: The requests for the for the warrants.
Speaker 12: So what they did was they fabricated claims that he
Speaker 12: was involving and endangering his children and his excitement to
Speaker 12: age it.
Speaker 13: And so this allowed them to initiate the charges against them.
Speaker 12: So he's currently at the moment, the arresting officers, the department,
Speaker 12: the boss utters and so he's got a long case
Speaker 12: ahead of him. He's representing himself. But that's just a
Speaker 12: little small update on what's going on there. And I
Speaker 12: wanted to talk about the history of Jews in China.
Speaker 12: I recently did a little a little little piece. It's
Speaker 12: gonna be a maybe a two three parter, and this
Speaker 12: goes back to evidence that was found by a Mark Orrelstein.
Speaker 12: This was a paper document that was written in a
Speaker 12: Hebrew in a in a Persian Hebrew language, and long
Speaker 12: story short, there's evidence that they were in China. So
Speaker 12: say at least a thousand years. Others say it could
Speaker 12: be as far back as for the destruction of the
Speaker 12: Second Temple, being these these particular Jews didn't practice certain
Speaker 12: high holy holidays that came into effect after destruction of
Speaker 12: a second Temple Iconica, so that during the Ming dynasty,
Speaker 12: the new the Jews numbered in such a large quantity
Speaker 12: that seven surnames were given to these Jews I, She, Gao, Jin, Lee, Jiang,
Speaker 12: and Zau.
Speaker 13: One of the.
Speaker 12: Dynasties of of of China actually has one of these
Speaker 12: Jewish names that were seven other or pardon six other
Speaker 12: names that were given Yen, Pau, langni On, Ziubai, and Zau.
Speaker 13: The Jiao dynasty was from ten forty six to fifty six.
Speaker 12: The first paper money was made in China with the
Speaker 12: help of particular group of people, and there was a
Speaker 12: British naval officer who was in China the early nineteen
Speaker 12: hundreds who had stated that a Jew of the local
Speaker 12: community in Shanghai had told him that the Jews of
Speaker 12: China number five million at the time and that we
Speaker 12: can also get into.
Speaker 13: Communism.
Speaker 12: The advent and adoption of communism in China and the
Speaker 12: person who was responsible for leaving their rebellion against the
Speaker 12: king dynasty.
Speaker 13: Qui m G.
Speaker 12: Happened to be from one of these Jewish surnames, and
Speaker 12: we all know communism and Jews.
Speaker 13: So I'm going to be.
Speaker 12: Hopefully this weekend. And yeah, if anyone's interested, you could
Speaker 12: check out my stuff on the Dylan Parnham YouTube channel
Speaker 12: d y L A N Space, FA R and UM
Speaker 12: and it's called Jay Talk or Jared. Yeah, come take it.
Speaker 13: He can get into the history of US in China.
Speaker 12: I've got World War one episode, World War two, COVID
Speaker 12: nine eleven, got a little bit of everything. I started from,
Speaker 12: you know, the Bible and worked my way forward through history.
Speaker 12: So I like to tie all things wrong in this
Speaker 12: world some way, shape or form to the Jays. So
Speaker 12: with that said, thank you for having me, gentlemen. It's
Speaker 12: always a pleasure. Happy to show my gree mug for
Speaker 12: the first time on here, and I'll keep good work.
Speaker 8: Appreciate it real quick before you go.
Speaker 7: I don't know if you're in too much of a rush,
Speaker 7: but you did mention the surnames, and one caught my ear.
Speaker 7: Now I don't speak Chinese, but I heard you say yen,
Speaker 7: and I know what yen is Yen's money. Yen is
Speaker 7: one of the surnames going around. I mean, if we
Speaker 7: think in over here in America, it was a Goldberg
Speaker 7: cash men, I mean kind of money, precious metals.
Speaker 8: So I'm curious.
Speaker 12: Yeah, correct, correct, day they were getting other They were
Speaker 12: also given uh names that are reminiscent of Western names
Speaker 12: like gold and stone as well.
Speaker 13: So you were spot on with that.
Speaker 5: And Uh.
Speaker 12: I looked up the ten riches billionaires in China. Three
Speaker 12: of them happen to be from Jewish surnames, one of
Speaker 12: them being the inventor of TikTok.
Speaker 11: So yeah, yeah, that's it. They're everywhere the world. The stage,
Speaker 11: my friend, always a pleasure, gentlemen, until the next time.
Speaker 7: Sign I know you're in a rash, I'll let you go.
Speaker 7: I would love to pick your brain some more. And
Speaker 7: I watched a good section of one of your Chinese things.
Speaker 7: By the way, I got a stone one of those
Speaker 7: days I went on a Jewish rabbit hole and how
Speaker 7: they're tied into the Chinese so elevating racism.
Speaker 13: I had to take the initial one down. My company
Speaker 13: had a little talk with me about it.
Speaker 12: Someone round it on me and I was wearing a
Speaker 12: company hat during uh during the filming, so they asked
Speaker 12: the either censor it or take it down.
Speaker 13: So I just refilmed yet. But yeah, yeah, yeah, good times,
Speaker 13: good times.
Speaker 4: Indeed, Well we'll let you go.
Speaker 7: I know you're you're trying to get some work done,
Speaker 7: and I think you ask good dat all, so I do.
Speaker 7: I'm the selfish part of me wants to keep picking
Speaker 7: your brain. But we'll go ahead and bring Shy in here.
Speaker 8: Appreciate you. We'll have to do something again some other time.
Speaker 8: I had you on my show forever ago.
Speaker 12: So yeah, yeah, well we'll do something soon and next
Speaker 12: week I'll try and I'll take my lunch instead of
Speaker 12: a short break, so i'll have a little more time
Speaker 12: to get hell.
Speaker 7: Yeah, all right, let's go ahead and get Shine here.
Speaker 7: Appreciate you, brother. We're gonna go ahead and kick you out, Shy.
Speaker 8: Let's get you in here. What's up, my friend?
Speaker 16: There?
Speaker 8: You're muted, so there you go, guys. What's up dude?
Speaker 8: What's on your mind this week? Brother?
Speaker 3: All right? So just I'll spit out some random thoughts,
Speaker 3: you know, the saying the world's a stage, right, Yeah,
Speaker 3: I was thinking about like whenever you see like a
Speaker 3: politician like or a world leaders talking, there's always a
Speaker 3: curtain behind them. They always think like the curtain for
Speaker 3: a play is always to hide what's going on in
Speaker 3: the background, set changes and all that. It's funny. So
Speaker 3: I was thinking about that, and let's think about that.
Speaker 3: I was also thinking about interestingly, you know, a word
Speaker 3: up until about twenty fourteen had the most definitions for
Speaker 3: this one word. The word is the word.
Speaker 8: Sorry myself, go ahead.
Speaker 3: The word is set. Set. The word set has the
Speaker 3: most up until twenty fourteen. After that, the word that
Speaker 3: beat that out moving forward to today is play. So
Speaker 3: it's like a set and a play, right man?
Speaker 4: That is faint.
Speaker 3: You could think about it like we used to sit
Speaker 3: down in front of it. We'd set ourselves in front
Speaker 3: of the TV sets. You'd have sets, and nowadays when
Speaker 3: the computer age and gaming and all that, it's played
Speaker 3: and it's like a it's a dichotomy, like a sediment.
Speaker 3: And that would go, oh, so, you know, is there
Speaker 3: any virus and anyone can correct me in the chat
Speaker 3: or somewhere. I've never in my life ever heard of,
Speaker 3: or can I find in my studies a virus that
Speaker 3: only affects old people, but not young people. Always throughout history,
Speaker 3: it's always been if it affects old people, it affects
Speaker 3: young people. Those are the people you have to is
Speaker 3: their immune system is up the park?
Speaker 7: Yeah, yeah, your immune is some ship the very early
Speaker 7: in stages of life, in the very end stages of
Speaker 7: the life.
Speaker 13: Yeah.
Speaker 3: So if we're going through, uh, a rewriting of reality, right,
Speaker 3: you're going to want to get rid of a lot
Speaker 3: of the old people that are going to be have
Speaker 3: the first hand knowledge of things. And sorry one second.
Speaker 4: And was waiting.
Speaker 3: Sorry anyway, So with the a mandela effect, and as
Speaker 3: I look at the word mende you know, the mendela,
Speaker 3: but it's like a mandala. A mandala actually produces a
Speaker 3: state where it increases your alpha and your petra states
Speaker 3: your waves, and it puts you in more of a
Speaker 3: lax and more susceptible type of mood. So yeah, I
Speaker 3: just and and just one more thing. When it comes
Speaker 3: to mind control, and we're rewriting reality, rewriting history mind control.
Speaker 3: So the word mind is the edemon of mine. Of
Speaker 3: mind comes from the same root as the word memory,
Speaker 3: so it's memes. So these two of the mind and
Speaker 3: memory are are connected. They are the same thing almost
Speaker 3: in a sense.
Speaker 7: Wasn't that also, Like maybe I'm wrong here, but wasn't
Speaker 7: that Odin's two ravens is a we're like memory and
Speaker 7: wisdom or something like, I forget it's it's something anyways.
Speaker 8: Maybe I'm a little off here, but go ahead.
Speaker 3: I'm not familiar with that.
Speaker 8: But Huguen and Munion I just know they were.
Speaker 7: Those are the two crows of Odin, and I know
Speaker 7: they had something to do with like, uh, I'll go ahead,
Speaker 7: I'm gonna look it up real quick because I know
Speaker 7: they say they mean something and that might be on something.
Speaker 4: Thought and memory boom and respectively what it translates to. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 4: that was right on.
Speaker 5: I think.
Speaker 10: Yeah.
Speaker 7: Odin was like the god of like magic, the god
Speaker 7: of the gap, the god of uh you know, kind
Speaker 7: of like a you know, equal exchange type deal, like
Speaker 7: you give something, you get something back.
Speaker 3: So and he gave his eye right yeah, okay. So
Speaker 3: and this always brings up in my mind like when
Speaker 3: you do those false memory shows. So mind control and
Speaker 3: false memory are pretty much synonymous, is the statements. Because control,
Speaker 3: the root of control is contrat like to go against
Speaker 3: and then rotis the role, and back in the day
Speaker 3: the control was you would have a king or would
Speaker 3: have like a list of say, everything that it was
Speaker 3: in his kingdom or whatever, and they would they would
Speaker 3: have a second a copy of that list so that
Speaker 3: they can double check, which what they would call the
Speaker 3: control to go against the role and make sure they
Speaker 3: both line up and nothing is missing and nothing is
Speaker 3: and cheat it out. So it's this rechecking of your
Speaker 3: memory and making you constantly recheck your memory, because you know,
Speaker 3: the memory is, like they say, it's like reproduced every
Speaker 3: single time you recall it. So if you could keep
Speaker 3: getting people to, you know, question their memory and not
Speaker 3: be sure in that and make things kind of elusive,
Speaker 3: it's a good way to kind of bring in a
Speaker 3: new type of reality.
Speaker 4: For sure. It's definitely the way you would be able
Speaker 4: to kind of fundamentally distort reality in its own just
Speaker 4: in its own right, in itself right, it would essentially
Speaker 4: be difficult to even gauge what is real and what
Speaker 4: is not if you can't even rely upon your own
Speaker 4: core memories right, which which that being fundamentally changed is
Speaker 4: legitimately discidive identity disorder in the way in which they
Speaker 4: kind of been deploy it upon the victims, right, because
Speaker 4: it essentially it it basically you know, destroys their ability
Speaker 4: to even have core memories to rely upon in the
Speaker 4: first place. So that is why they can have this
Speaker 4: distorted version of reality in itself, and that's what they Yeah, and.
Speaker 3: It destroys credibility too, you know, oh yeah, exactly how
Speaker 3: you explained it. Once you start questioning yourself, it's like,
Speaker 3: how if you can't trust your own self, how do
Speaker 3: you expect other people to trust?
Speaker 7: I think may have been onto some of the Odin thing,
Speaker 7: like considering all the things that he you know, stands
Speaker 7: for hugen immune in thought and memory, and as you're
Speaker 7: talking about like if you take these things away, like
Speaker 7: what if if you understand like kind of the root
Speaker 7: concepts of Odin, it is kind of you could almost
Speaker 7: make the case he's like a god of trauma cycles
Speaker 7: and and also weirdly magic. So if we're talking about
Speaker 7: the sort of stuff that me and Austin talk about regularly,
Speaker 7: that's kind of and he's like kind of the godhead
Speaker 7: of all this stuff.
Speaker 8: So it's like the one of the prime.
Speaker 4: Characters Golden hanging from world tree is So it's like in.
Speaker 7: Your manipulating thought and memory like these are your you know,
Speaker 7: your prime pets, your prime like your your agents out
Speaker 7: there in the world. You're manipulating thought and memory in
Speaker 7: order to you know, get something in exchange for some
Speaker 7: trauma of some sort, you know, manipulating it to create
Speaker 7: the create magic of sorts. So I don't know, maybe
Speaker 7: I just feel like there's something there.
Speaker 11: I don't know.
Speaker 4: I mean, maybe I'm reaching, but that's kind of what
Speaker 4: we're doing here.
Speaker 13: I love it.
Speaker 4: I appreciate you guys, of course, brother. Yeah, I just
Speaker 4: I feel like I have to at the very least
Speaker 4: tie off the disclosure uf FOT and utilizing you know,
Speaker 4: the church as a vessel to promote this kind of concept.
Speaker 4: And and I think again it's tailored toward whichever demographic
Speaker 4: they're hoping to manipulate, right that. And that's what the
Speaker 4: sinister levels of deception are kind of perfectly that they
Speaker 4: were essentially manufactured for this very purpose, and that's why
Speaker 4: they're easily relied on in these moments. And I think
Speaker 4: that's when it's most obvious and overtly in your face
Speaker 4: and hard to deny as being reality. And I saw
Speaker 4: like almost a chronological order of how this began to
Speaker 4: go viral in a way, because that if you haven't noticed,
Speaker 4: there's definitely this specifically one clip of a televangelist who
Speaker 4: basically is talking about how you know, he's wielding disclosure
Speaker 4: through the church, but how it's effectively going to impact
Speaker 4: his basically through this arranged and orchestrated meeting with the
Speaker 4: powers that be in the current administration, who are telling
Speaker 4: them that major disclosure is about to transpire and they
Speaker 4: need to brace their congregations for the impact right that
Speaker 4: it will effectively have on the church at large. And
Speaker 4: so that in its own right is something that's fascinating.
Speaker 4: And so before this though, if you didn't realize obviously
Speaker 4: JD Vance had that clip where he goes viral talking
Speaker 4: about how extraterrestrials are demons, right, Yeah, which is that
Speaker 4: in itself it's especially JD Vance kind of coming out
Speaker 4: with that concept just an interesting premise in its own right.
Speaker 4: And then Anna Paulina Luna, she says, the American public,
Speaker 4: this is on April twenty ninth, is on the verge
Speaker 4: of getting long awaited answers, and hence proof of non
Speaker 4: human life is about to be revealed, describing them as
Speaker 4: quote interdimensional beings. Luna says she has personally witnessed things
Speaker 4: she cannot explain and that the public will soon have
Speaker 4: to quote see for themselves and draw their own conclusions.
Speaker 4: I have observed things that are of non human origin
Speaker 4: and creation. I don't call the aliens, all right.
Speaker 3: So my cat like, what the fuck.
Speaker 4: The right? So it especially the former Stripper right of
Speaker 4: all people coming out with UFO disclosure, and it's just
Speaker 4: hilarious and cartoonish, as it should be. But then we
Speaker 4: get an additional layer to this, and it came in
Speaker 4: the form of Stephen Greer himself, which we shouldn't at
Speaker 4: all be surprised. I mean, if you know who Stephen
Speaker 4: Greer is, he is the face of modern disclosure in
Speaker 4: a real way. And what was that meeting that he
Speaker 4: arranged that fundamentally put the disclosure project on the map,
Speaker 4: with all the high level government military officials being there
Speaker 4: and addressing the public with this major disclosure agenda. And
Speaker 4: so Stephen Greer comes out and he says he's warning
Speaker 4: us that the deep State is now pivoting from Project
Speaker 4: Bluebeam to creating a quote holy war between humans and demons.
Speaker 4: He says that he is personally holding JD. Vance accountable
Speaker 4: for making the statement that aliens are actually demons, and
Speaker 4: Stephen Greer says a holy war between humans and the
Speaker 4: agents of Satan. This was his statement that you made,
Speaker 4: which again, Stephen Brier, Rockefeller interests entirely financed, you know,
Speaker 4: the disclosure agenda in the first place, So keep that
Speaker 4: in mind. But what we're gonna say say.
Speaker 3: It is interesting though I have I'm sure everyone sees
Speaker 3: that there has been an up of calling people like
Speaker 3: evil or demon like, a rise in that, which is weird.
Speaker 3: That's like, really weird if you're just going to like
Speaker 3: call someone you disagree with. I don't know, but you know,
Speaker 3: if you go there, even in your mind, if you
Speaker 3: go there, bro, like, you gotta know you're kind of tripping,
Speaker 3: you know what I'm saying? What an evil demon this?
Speaker 4: You know that? Yeah, they better actually have committed some
Speaker 4: demonic sort of the crimes to actually associate them with
Speaker 4: that statement, I would say, in a responsible way, I guess.
Speaker 4: But this is the viral clip right that has been
Speaker 4: making the rounds. As far as this individual televangelist going
Speaker 4: on the record, you know, officially citing this meeting that
Speaker 4: allegedly took place that now is bracing their congregations for
Speaker 4: the impact of disclosure.
Speaker 16: I had a friend that sent me a text message.
Speaker 16: I was in a meeting, a weekend meeting preaching Friday,
Speaker 16: Saturday and Sunday morning, and he said, Perry, can you
Speaker 16: give me a call? I have some information that has
Speaker 16: come to my attention. Of course, when a friend of
Speaker 16: yours does that that you know quite well, you're not.
Speaker 16: You have no idea what information they're talking about. And
Speaker 16: I'm not going to go into great detail, but there
Speaker 16: were a large number of pastors that had been invited
Speaker 16: to go to a certain state to hear some men
Speaker 16: in the United States government and others share with them
Speaker 16: a concern that they had. And this particular man, I'll
Speaker 16: not name him, and then we may end up doing
Speaker 16: some teachings with him or having an event at his
Speaker 16: church as a great church. But he said, Perry, what
Speaker 16: they're about to release from what we're hearing, there's going
Speaker 16: to be a release concerning aliens and concerning unidentified flying
Speaker 16: object spacecraft that some of the people who were in
Speaker 16: the meeting were telling us, as pastors, you need to
Speaker 16: prepare your people, and you need to get ready to
Speaker 16: answer them for what you're about to hear being released.
Speaker 16: And some of it has to do with crafts that
Speaker 16: have been discovered that are not allegedly a part of
Speaker 16: our planet, and the materials they're made of are not
Speaker 16: a part of our planet. Very strange reptilian looking creatures
Speaker 16: and other things that almost sound like something out of
Speaker 16: a sci fi movie or an Orson Wells book.
Speaker 4: Oh shit, su Orson Wells is even obviously strategically mentioned,
Speaker 4: I would think. But this man, Chris Man, Oh, it's
Speaker 4: playing again for me. But this man is clearly not
Speaker 4: the face of disclosure in any kind of reliable way, right,
Speaker 4: If you can't tell just by not only his wardrobe,
Speaker 4: but the way in which he speaks and the level
Speaker 4: of knowledge that he possesses is clearly a problematic and
Speaker 4: it's on right. But anyway, he said a lot. And
Speaker 4: if we take this seriously, which I do, think that
Speaker 4: there's a reason many of these clips such as this
Speaker 4: go viral, I think it's it's in no way an
Speaker 4: organic situation playing out these algorithms we know for a fact,
Speaker 4: are are are you know, manicured and specifically kind of
Speaker 4: they deboost and and specifically boost exactly what they want
Speaker 4: us to essentially engage with, which will in its own
Speaker 4: just in the way in which it's it's basically being
Speaker 4: you know, strategically utilized, is it will essentially it's just
Speaker 4: always this is inevitably the case in terms of how
Speaker 4: they they just undoubtedly exploit these kind of already preordained
Speaker 4: avenues of interest that they know for a fact they
Speaker 4: can kind of wield for this this permanent kind of Again,
Speaker 4: it's not just restructuring the power paradigm, because I do
Speaker 4: think that's the ultimate end result of what's playing out here.
Speaker 4: But if you don't take the seriously as far as
Speaker 4: actually having individual pastors come together and have this this
Speaker 4: well manicured, you know, and well designed kind of I
Speaker 4: would think scripted right a response to what their congregation
Speaker 4: and the questions they might actually have. Yeah, they're going
Speaker 4: to have to and and that's I think that this
Speaker 4: is more relevant than ever before because just in terms
Speaker 4: of the current administration, the level of just how far
Speaker 4: beyond the pale we truly find ourselves at the current moment,
Speaker 4: right Like, never in my life did I think and
Speaker 4: they've utilized this current administration to push that pill so
Speaker 4: far forward into this unprecedented kind of area and territory
Speaker 4: that that I just wouldn't put anything past them at
Speaker 4: this point in terms of what they are going to
Speaker 4: set as a precedent going forward. And this again will
Speaker 4: without a doubt, fundamentally affect you know, individuals within the
Speaker 4: concept of the dynamic of their core family unit, and
Speaker 4: and even people that I know and love will will
Speaker 4: either embrace the boble Azar narrative attached to all of this, right, uh,
Speaker 4: and and the extraterrestrial threat, which I think many of
Speaker 4: them view as like a potential opportunity to restructure global society,
Speaker 4: which is exactly what is being staged, right. But unfortunately,
Speaker 4: many people are under the false impression that this is uh,
Speaker 4: you know, honestly an organic sort of situation playing out right,
Speaker 4: And they're there that.
Speaker 3: There's a bunch of YouTubers that just like went to
Speaker 3: the Vatican.
Speaker 4: Right, Oh dude, Oh my god. Yeah, So that's a reality.
Speaker 4: I was telling jose about that just because I had
Speaker 4: seen this this clip of Nick fuintest, right, and the
Speaker 4: first thing that I thought was it's it's yet again.
Speaker 4: And beyond Erica Kirk right, it's it's the most a
Speaker 4: more recent example of the influencer wars k fabe, which
Speaker 4: we've discussed many times in the past, which again comes
Speaker 4: in the form of not only Erica in her most
Speaker 4: recent kind of psychotic glare and heavy breathing, you know,
Speaker 4: like the fact that that was the way in which
Speaker 4: she presented herself when she's declaring war on canvas after
Speaker 4: her near death experience. The White House correspondence then her
Speaker 4: it was just hilarious. And again, these people, I in
Speaker 4: no way I'm defending Candace. I think they're both entirely
Speaker 4: controlled assets. But at the same time, it's it's just
Speaker 4: laughable because Nick Fuentes is taking shots at Tucker Carlson,
Speaker 4: who basically implicated and alluded to the notion that he's
Speaker 4: willing and potentially going to run for president at some
Speaker 4: point in the future, which I do legitimately believe will happen.
Speaker 4: And you're going to have all the usual retarded suspects
Speaker 4: actually falling into the camp of supporting Tucker Carlson, and
Speaker 4: we'll have our own CIA operative in the White House.
Speaker 4: It'll be wonderful. They'll restructure the global economy. Uh and
Speaker 4: and so Nick fintest right taking shots at Tucker. What
Speaker 4: does he say? Tucker invited me to a dinner and
Speaker 4: interviewed me very friendly. The next day he texted that
Speaker 4: it was really interesting and he enjoyed it. Ever since then,
Speaker 4: he has been going around telling people it was all
Speaker 4: a ruse just to expose me, and that he regrets it.
Speaker 4: What kind of person does that, which obviously it means
Speaker 4: nothing that you know, he's taking these low level blows
Speaker 4: as far as just you know, the social consequences in
Speaker 4: a way. But what I thought was most fascinating was
Speaker 4: this clip that Jake real.
Speaker 7: Quick us and before we move on from the demon stuff,
Speaker 7: there's one little thing I did want to throw in
Speaker 7: someone in the present. It's kind of riffing off of
Speaker 7: what Shi was saying about them over using the label.
Speaker 7: But we also had program the chill here in the
Speaker 7: chat saying I think the demon labels being overused and
Speaker 7: purpose just on purpose, just like fascists or nazis a
Speaker 7: slur to take the power away from the meaning of
Speaker 7: the world and being outed as such. And I think
Speaker 7: there's something too that there's almost like a dialectic play
Speaker 7: possibly being played here. One example of this is, I
Speaker 7: don't know, have you ever heard about the book Childhood's End?
Speaker 8: Who is a Spy? This is by Arthur C.
Speaker 7: Clark, and the whole premise of the the book it's
Speaker 7: from like the fifties essentially, like these aliens come down.
Speaker 8: It's like post World War two.
Speaker 7: It's like rad as we're geting ready to go to
Speaker 7: the moon or something, so kind of on the cusp
Speaker 7: of like the nuclear age, you know, kind of this
Speaker 7: old timey alien theme, and these aliens come down.
Speaker 8: To Earth to help us out.
Speaker 7: And they look literally exactly like demons, like they cloven hooves,
Speaker 7: you know, crazy horns, red skin, you know, the fucking
Speaker 7: wings everything. And I think, if I think, if I
Speaker 7: recall correctly, they actually end up like they come down
Speaker 7: showing themselves to be like the good guys and helping
Speaker 7: out humanity. I think the main character is like skeptical
Speaker 7: of them, and I think you actually find out. If
Speaker 7: I haven't read the book, but I think my understanding
Speaker 7: is you do find out they actually are the good guys,
Speaker 7: and like that's actually it was like I forget that.
Speaker 7: It's it's kind of convoluted, but either way, you know,
Speaker 7: I think there's something to that, Like this has already
Speaker 7: been kind of seated out, this idea of these like
Speaker 7: and this kind of ties into the teal like uh,
Speaker 7: you know, the concept of it's like AI Jesus that
Speaker 7: Rogan's kind of floated out about as well, or AI God.
Speaker 7: You know, like these same ideas and kind of so
Speaker 7: I can see this dialectic being in play, and I
Speaker 7: don't know how it would be used, but I do
Speaker 7: find that, at least the very least interesting. But anyways,
Speaker 7: back to Fuentes before we moved on from the demon thing,
Speaker 7: I wanted to throw that because that's actually been showing
Speaker 7: up my feet a lot lately.
Speaker 8: I don't know what it is on my YouTube shorts.
Speaker 7: That specific specifically clips from that, Like I guess it's
Speaker 7: a movie they or a show they made out of it,
Speaker 7: but I don't know.
Speaker 8: Seems significant to me at least.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, they're conditioning the subconscious minds of the public.
Speaker 4: There's no doubt in mind. And you know, as far
Speaker 4: as I'm concerned, and and I think that's exactly what
Speaker 4: the algorithm preference is about out right prioritizing these these
Speaker 4: concepts in order for people to at large be exposed
Speaker 4: to this these notions and and uh it has a
Speaker 4: subconscious impact at the very least, and they will leverage that.
Speaker 4: And uh, you know you mentioned Peter Tielman. I mean
Speaker 4: what we just saw a Polunteer Inc. Like a major
Speaker 4: deal uh with USDA to manage farmland and control America's
Speaker 4: agriculture data. Right, and this is all about taking over
Speaker 4: the domestic food supply of America. And uh, you know,
Speaker 4: the data in its own right will eventually be tokenized apparently,
Speaker 4: which you know we've been predicting in a certain sort
Speaker 4: of authoritarian totalitarian way. Uh, and it'll be inevitably tracked
Speaker 4: on a blockchain and these these digital led ledgers right
Speaker 4: where it's basically will be mitigated by AI. Right, all
Speaker 4: of this is within the concept of the AI infrastructure
Speaker 4: being deployed, and food and farming will will therefore become
Speaker 4: a permission based concept in its in itself. And and
Speaker 4: that's that's the level of dystopian kind of global reconstruction
Speaker 4: that we're discussing here. As as far as the ability
Speaker 4: to control, you know, the domestic food supply of the US,
Speaker 4: that's a major just authoritarian move that palanteered three hundred
Speaker 4: million dollars deal with the US Department of Agriculture to
Speaker 4: enhance the security and management of the food supply chain.
Speaker 4: It focuses oil that.
Speaker 3: It's not just oil that was coming through that straight
Speaker 3: to HAMUS.
Speaker 7: It's fucking like a large majority of fertilized certilizer exactly.
Speaker 4: And I think, by the way, there's an insane story
Speaker 4: about what's happening in the strait right now. And did
Speaker 4: you see that ridiculous narrative of now This is Iranian
Speaker 4: state media, but the Economic Times and a few other
Speaker 4: publications obviously ran articles on this, and it was discussing
Speaker 4: how US forces attacked civilian cargo boats and the straight
Speaker 4: of form moves right. This resulted in at least five
Speaker 4: deaths of Iranian civilians, And this directly contradicts Washington, DC's
Speaker 4: assertion of the mainstream media in the US that these
Speaker 4: vessels were Iranian military boats is what the US claimed
Speaker 4: initially threatening commercial shipping, but in reality they were civilian
Speaker 4: cargo boats and the US military massacred five. Yeah, Iranian civilians, dude,
Speaker 4: this is a reality. And the incident occurred apparently during
Speaker 4: a US mission to secure maritime corridors and ensure freedom
Speaker 4: of navigation. That was the claim, but they were referred
Speaker 4: to as Reports indicate six so called Iranian small boats
Speaker 4: fired upon by US forces on Monday were not associated
Speaker 4: with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Instead, Tehran maintains that
Speaker 4: they were civilian vessels transporting passengers commercial goods. So again
Speaker 4: Iranian state media. So take it for what it is, right,
Speaker 4: Obviously we're having having a propaganda war play out with
Speaker 4: in terms of the conflict as well, So you can't
Speaker 4: always trust your eyes, you know, as much as you
Speaker 4: want to imagine. As terrible as it is, but you know,
Speaker 4: the confirmation bias of realizing the imperial war machine has
Speaker 4: has you know, blood soaked consequences, it's not a far
Speaker 4: kind of far off thought to consider that this is
Speaker 4: just a par for the course. Unfortunately, I don't know why.
Speaker 7: I don't know why you're worried about this, Austin, though
Speaker 7: the downs at fifty thousand, you know this, Austin speaking
Speaker 7: of though the dal being in fifty thousand and moving on,
Speaker 7: because are you ready go hang out with.
Speaker 8: The patrons the non pores down?
Speaker 4: Can I do one last thing before we leave because
Speaker 4: I'm desperate to mention the fact that, especially considering the
Speaker 4: disclosure agenda playing out here, you have that individual scientist
Speaker 4: who suspicious death right surrounding her story, UFO length scientists
Speaker 4: claimed a top secret energy weapon blasted her before death.
Speaker 4: Now the Pentagon ad missed, they're real right, that was
Speaker 4: a legitimate story. So I looked into this, and it
Speaker 4: turns out a futuristic weapon, often dismissed as a conspiracy theory,
Speaker 4: has been publicly acknowledged as being part of the US
Speaker 4: military's vast arsenal. The US Department of War chose Star
Speaker 4: Wars Day on May fourth to state that quote, directed
Speaker 4: energy weapons are a fine addition to our arsenal. Directed
Speaker 4: energy weapons are obviously devices capable of firing rays of energy,
Speaker 4: such as microwaves at a target. Simply put, they fire
Speaker 4: laser beams at the enemy, often to scramble and physically
Speaker 4: damage electronic equipment. Now this is according to the Daily Mail.
Speaker 4: They're actually reporting this. In the Pentagon's post on social media,
Speaker 4: they confirmed that dw's produced beams of concentrated electromagnetic energy
Speaker 4: or atomic or subatomic particles. And so this officially seements
Speaker 4: decades of rumors and conspiracy theories that the military has
Speaker 4: been working on futuristic esoteric weapons systems. I added the
Speaker 4: esyleteric weapons systems, but still you get the point. Was
Speaker 4: once thought of as science fiction or unrealistic experiments by
Speaker 4: Pentagon researchers. Now Amy Eskridge is the woman you know,
Speaker 4: we're speaking on in terms of the scientists who was killed.
Speaker 4: And that's where this revelation comes from because all of
Speaker 4: these details around her case obviously being revealed. So she
Speaker 4: reportedly took her own life after claiming she was not suicidal.
Speaker 4: She would never kill herself, you know, obviously personally to
Speaker 4: people that knew her, and I think she even made
Speaker 4: public statements, didn't she I can't remember now. But the
Speaker 4: point is that June eleventh a cult holiday everyone, Just
Speaker 4: so you're aware, this is like, there's no way in
Speaker 4: hell that's the most I would just say, impactful, news worthy,
Speaker 4: especially if they gained traction in the media spotlight. It's
Speaker 4: always worthwhile in identifying the date being in a cult
Speaker 4: ritualistic holiday of symbolic.
Speaker 8: Always double check if it's pure all right, guys.
Speaker 4: Yeah, hundred percent. So she was thirty four years old
Speaker 4: and you know, basically there were images of her body
Speaker 4: and images that basically showed damage that these weapons could
Speaker 4: also cause to the human body, right, And I think
Speaker 4: that's what's interesting is that pictures and text messages basically
Speaker 4: by a former British intelligence officer reveals burned skin, lesions,
Speaker 4: and painful blisters, and Eskridge allegedly suffered those exact sort
Speaker 4: of obviously those were the injuries that she had sustained.
Speaker 4: As the point I'm making basically, I'm sorry, no, dude,
Speaker 4: you can jump in if you want to want to
Speaker 4: say something. I'm just trying to basically present the bare
Speaker 4: bones anyway.
Speaker 3: Real quick. You can go see experiments of small scale
Speaker 3: experiments of those lasers that don't touch anything that's blue.
Speaker 3: You can see the actual experiments like they just make
Speaker 3: them bigger. You know what I'm saying exactly, I suggest
Speaker 3: everyone to start wearing blue all the time.
Speaker 4: Right, There's the reason all those FEMA you know shots, Right,
Speaker 4: but with the UH, it wasn't just like FEMA comms,
Speaker 4: vans and all these this uh basically the the physical
Speaker 4: property that they were utilizing in the area where where
Speaker 4: the major fires took place.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 4: Uh, you saw essentially the all the the interesting things
Speaker 4: that weren't damaged whatsoever by the fire happened to have
Speaker 4: this blue paint or something to that effect, right that
Speaker 4: that uh, and I think even vehicles that were just
Speaker 4: that specifically near that color of blue where untouched you know,
Speaker 4: in the in these major destroyed areas. Yeah, it was
Speaker 4: just like, how is that even possible? And so it
Speaker 4: did make that And I remember covering that when the
Speaker 4: Mali fires happened, right when we discussed and showed pictures
Speaker 4: of the blue untouched and undamaged uh you know, pieces
Speaker 4: of property, uh that that were of the most highly
Speaker 4: destroyed areas. But anyway, the end, the end kind of
Speaker 4: detailed just provide the last fundamental details of this strange
Speaker 4: connection to Eskridge.
Speaker 10: Right.
Speaker 4: So, not only was the injury, were the injuries that
Speaker 4: she sustained eerily similar to that of you know, what
Speaker 4: you would obviously sustain if you were targeted by a
Speaker 4: directed energy weapon. But uh, this British intelligence officer, which
Speaker 4: again always coming from a source within the intelligence apparatus,
Speaker 4: and you know, and and that's what we're forced to
Speaker 4: rely on. But he's the one who reveals all of
Speaker 4: this and basically, he claimed that this is she had
Speaker 4: to have suffered a beam from a directed energy weapon
Speaker 4: which was fired into her home by an unknown assailant,
Speaker 4: and the fact that you have mainstream media publications actually
Speaker 4: running with this story is in its own right something
Speaker 4: to address. But Frank Milburn, a retired paratrooper, investigated the
Speaker 4: Eskridge case. He concluded she was murdered by a private
Speaker 4: aerospace company to stop her research on futuristic propulsion technology
Speaker 4: and national security threats. The images shared by Milburn also
Speaker 4: revealed how a microwave from an alleged dew scorched the
Speaker 4: window of Eskridge's Huntsville, Alabama home as the beam passed
Speaker 4: through the glass. Escridge's death was reportedly ruled a suicide
Speaker 4: from a gunshot wound to the head, but the scientists
Speaker 4: allegedly consulted a former CI weapons expert about the directed
Speaker 4: energy weapon attack in early twenty twenty two. Tell me,
Speaker 4: what fucking world are we living in right now? Bad
Speaker 4: like this? This really is beyond the pale of anything
Speaker 4: that I could have imagined being publicly addressed and acknowledged
Speaker 4: by the mainstream press in my lifetime. It's it's uh,
Speaker 4: you know clearly if you if you if you just
Speaker 4: started off with this concept to the average person without
Speaker 4: providing the detailed source, what what do you think would happen?
Speaker 4: They would laugh in your face probably right as far
Speaker 4: as just can I don't know. Maybe that's how far
Speaker 4: culturally we're shifting and at a very fast rate that
Speaker 4: people are now willing and ready to actually consider these
Speaker 4: ideas and concepts, which I do find valuable. But also
Speaker 4: you have to be very wary, right of of again where.
Speaker 3: Main ship, that's that's wild death with that and then
Speaker 3: someone came in after and popped her, Like how they
Speaker 3: get the suicide by gun?
Speaker 4: It had to have been this and that, Like, that's
Speaker 4: what you would have had to have arranged the crime scene,
Speaker 4: right because clearly if you did utilize directed energy weapons,
Speaker 4: you would have operatives on the ground afterward who would
Speaker 4: follow up with securing the crime scene and making certain
Speaker 4: that no detail. I mean I would I would have
Speaker 4: to think this is legitimately a process that that they
Speaker 4: are very comfortable with. You know, we've seen it in
Speaker 4: the past. How many times can can we? I mean,
Speaker 4: our entire intro is filled with martyrs, right, people who
Speaker 4: caught a glimpse of the octopus and made an example
Speaker 4: of and to this day the cases are either facilitating
Speaker 4: a cover up or legitimately cold cases that haven't been
Speaker 4: solved whatsoever, because we know the official narrative is completely, uh,
Speaker 4: you know, fraught with inaccuracies, and at the very least,
Speaker 4: you know, intended to provide that and facilitate that, that
Speaker 4: concept of the cover up. Anyway, the notion that the
Speaker 4: CIA weapons expert was legitimately a part of this investigation
Speaker 4: into the crime scene of Escridge's death, there's a lot
Speaker 4: more to it, apparently, Milburn said Eskridge message Hymn specifically
Speaker 4: to say, quote my XCIA weapons guy on my team
Speaker 4: saw my hands when they were burned really badly a
Speaker 4: couple months ago, and he saw that window pane in person.
Speaker 4: That's what she wrote to him. So I'm taking this
Speaker 4: far more seriously than ever before. I didn't even care
Speaker 4: about these missing and I mean I thought the scientists
Speaker 4: going missing and obviously winding up dead in suspicious circumstances
Speaker 4: was important and clearly noteworthy, as far as like realizing
Speaker 4: at a later date I would have to pry further
Speaker 4: deeper into the cases themselves. To see where I would
Speaker 4: come to a conclusion and exactly how I would internalize this,
Speaker 4: digest this information. But it definitely wasn't at the top
Speaker 4: of my list of priorities as far as wading through
Speaker 4: the levels of psyops being bestowed upon us. Right, and
Speaker 4: I'll finish this. I know I've been talking a lot.
Speaker 4: I apologize, but it's just when you realize the level
Speaker 4: of detail involved in this right and potentially actually being
Speaker 4: reinforced in a real way, it's hard not to address, right.
Speaker 4: So I'll leave it at that, really, because you know,
Speaker 4: other than that, he said he had built things like
Speaker 4: that and that it was most likely this, according to her,
Speaker 4: when she reached out to Milburn Frank Milburn is the
Speaker 4: name again, retired paratrooper. He had a personal conversation with her.
Speaker 4: He said he had built things like that and that
Speaker 4: it was most likely an rf K band emitter run
Speaker 4: by five car batteries strung together from inside an suv.
Speaker 4: Imagine that this is a legitimate, viable weapon of assassination,
Speaker 4: right as far as targeting a priority subject or you know,
Speaker 4: it's just to think that they could pull up with
Speaker 4: an suv filled with car batteries to utilize this technology
Speaker 4: against you is something to really consider as being just
Speaker 4: a threat out there, right.
Speaker 3: And weapons for quiet wars?
Speaker 8: Hell yeah, man, save away from windows motherfuckers.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 4: So anyway, that's really the last noteworthy part on that death.
Speaker 4: But the fact that directed energy weapons are now officially
Speaker 4: being confirmed as existing and being among the arsenal and
Speaker 4: in the the American military force, it's just fascinating where
Speaker 4: we are and and these this UFO scientist, you know,
Speaker 4: missing scientist connection seems to be you know, providing us
Speaker 4: with far more than what I imagined as far as
Speaker 4: what is layered into the details of some of the
Speaker 4: cases involved here. And there was one last connection and
Speaker 4: then we're done and we can get out of here.
Speaker 4: CI is mind control program in turmoil after scientist's mysterious death. Okay,
Speaker 4: so now we have modern MK ulture being confirmed by
Speaker 4: the establishment. Now if through that lens of the UFO
Speaker 4: scientists being suspiciously you know, disappearing or murdered, So look
Speaker 4: into this. A congressional hearing to examine the CIA's secretive
Speaker 4: mind control program has been set for this very month.
Speaker 4: But I thought MK ultra ended everyone. Isn't that the
Speaker 4: concept we were supposed to have you know, embraced back
Speaker 4: in the nineteen seventies when they promised us this would
Speaker 4: never have been driven underground into occult organizations and religious
Speaker 4: cult groups, no way. So what what's it say? My
Speaker 4: dad was a government scientist working on a secret of
Speaker 4: mind control program. Then the CIA murdered him. This is
Speaker 4: where we're getting the actual you know, wormwood, which you
Speaker 4: had mentioned earlier, and how that kind of factors into
Speaker 4: this call for accountability and this reinvestigation of a suspicious death.
Speaker 4: All the way back then, when this disclosure was allegedly
Speaker 4: being you know, revealed to the public and and you know,
Speaker 4: the committee hearings were being held. What happened, right? They
Speaker 4: exposed the fact that you had an individual CIA operative
Speaker 4: who was a part of what was it? They had
Speaker 4: a safe house in a hotel, right, and they basically
Speaker 4: dosed the punch. Isn't that what effectively happened? If I
Speaker 4: remember correctly? Frank Olsen was the name Frank Olsen. Yeah,
Speaker 4: there's I think a Netflix documentary or something about it.
Speaker 8: It's called I think actually Okay, yeah, correctly.
Speaker 4: That makes sense. I'm pretty sure I had seen like
Speaker 4: clips of it, but I never actually watched it personally,
Speaker 4: but at some point I'll have to actually go through
Speaker 4: it because I've exposed myself to the Frank Olsen case.
Speaker 4: But also I just realized that he never committed suicide.
Speaker 4: He was pushed out the window. He had information that
Speaker 4: he was willing to speak on that they they obviously
Speaker 4: wanted to keep quiet and secretive and hidden from public disclosure,
Speaker 4: and so he became a priority target. But they also
Speaker 4: wanted to experiment upon him and see exactly what happened
Speaker 4: during the process of his fake suicide, right, which was
Speaker 4: unfortunately a murder. But we're led to believe that annapolinea
Speaker 4: Luna of all people, the former stripper who's in charge
Speaker 4: of UFO disclosure, is now going to bring accountability to
Speaker 4: the modern MK ulture program. And I just think that's
Speaker 4: a little too hard to believe. But it is her
Speaker 4: who announced on Wednesday that a Task Force on the
Speaker 4: Declassification of Federal Secrets, which is the apparent task force
Speaker 4: that provided right, the original wasn't a JFK documents. They
Speaker 4: tried to act like, look, we gave you the documents,
Speaker 4: and it I.
Speaker 7: Had a term I was using to be cute. I
Speaker 7: forgot what I was calling it, But it was like
Speaker 7: kind of generally all the disclosure stuff jfk Epstein Aliens
Speaker 7: is like that was kind of their big things coming
Speaker 7: in MLKA.
Speaker 8: Innapaulina Luna has kind of been like the lead lady
Speaker 8: for all of this for that task force, right, Yeah.
Speaker 4: And so it's called the Classification of Federal Secrets Task
Speaker 4: Force and it's apparently set to hold a hearing on
Speaker 4: the Cold War era mk Ultra program on May thirteenth.
Speaker 4: But also how basically this scientist who was found dead
Speaker 4: was apparently operating in the modern program of mk Ultra,
Speaker 4: and this was the research she was conducting whenever she
Speaker 4: suspiciously went missing. So the fact that this led to,
Speaker 4: which the way in which it's been disclosed to the
Speaker 4: public through various articles, is CI's mind control program in
Speaker 4: turmoil after scientist's mysterious death. Now they're trying to play
Speaker 4: in the Frank Olsen case to really I think drive
Speaker 4: attention away from what they're anowledge effectively, which is this
Speaker 4: modern m Kiltra operation that's still very much active. And
Speaker 4: that's not the concept they want you to take away
Speaker 4: from this. They want you to go back and be entirely,
Speaker 4: you know, just control the exactly in the narrative which we.
Speaker 8: Were talking about for the show.
Speaker 7: If I recall, I might be wrong, But if I
Speaker 7: recall correctly, I believe, you know, after a long and
Speaker 7: storied crusade by the Olsen family, I believe they ended
Speaker 7: up getting actually some sort of recognition and I believe
Speaker 7: even money, perhaps if I'm recalling correctly, from the federal government,
Speaker 7: I believe even some specific present.
Speaker 8: I think there was like a hole to do about
Speaker 8: all of this.
Speaker 7: So like now, I don't think they technically ever actually
Speaker 7: copped up to any of it, but it was like
Speaker 7: kind of I don't know, almost symbolic I guess basically
Speaker 7: kind of did from my recollection. So it would only
Speaker 7: make sense that that would be the thing that they
Speaker 7: really lean in on and provide some sort of disclosure on.
Speaker 7: And it's something that like we kind of I'll already
Speaker 7: know when they kind of already did acknowledge. So yeah,
Speaker 7: I just it would be kind of funny. Well, I
Speaker 7: guess I'm not saying don't do that. I'm just saying
Speaker 7: of like just kind of seems like a big deal
Speaker 7: for like, yeah, we already knew this this is right
Speaker 7: exactly much as is to be expected.
Speaker 8: From this current administration.
Speaker 7: But we're over two hours. I want to go hang out.
Speaker 7: I want to have time to bill hang out with
Speaker 7: the patrons in the post show. I'm usually pretty bad
Speaker 7: because I'm over here on the East Coast.
Speaker 8: It's late. I do try to hang out in the
Speaker 8: post show.
Speaker 7: Austin, I know it's earlier in the night for you,
Speaker 7: so he usually hangs out for a long ass time
Speaker 7: with you guys that's interested in hanging out. But I
Speaker 7: do want to get out of your shy. We'll hang
Speaker 7: out with you in a second. I appreciate you hanging
Speaker 7: out with us here in the after a show portion.
Speaker 7: We'll see you here in a few minutes. Go ahead
Speaker 7: and kick you out. But Austin, ay, I guess any
Speaker 7: final thoughts. I hesitate to say that because.
Speaker 8: We'll be here for you.
Speaker 4: But I know we talked to him about directed energy weapons,
Speaker 4: and I did have a beautiful less than a minute,
Speaker 4: the kind of just closing clip right that would help
Speaker 4: entirely reinforce this slow roll of disclosure, even with and
Speaker 4: even in considering it through this lens of directed energy
Speaker 4: weapons being I don't know embraced as as as possible
Speaker 4: and potential. I don't know, it's it's again what the
Speaker 4: public will effectively embrace as kind of being a commonplace right,
Speaker 4: and and all of a sudden it's very quickly kind
Speaker 4: of swept under the rug and essentially and not even
Speaker 4: registers as as an extraordinary right, just avenue of of
Speaker 4: a window into the sophisticated levels of technology they've been
Speaker 4: able to deploy upon us domestically speaking, is the only
Speaker 4: point I'm making. So this fully reinforces that fact. And
Speaker 4: again the timing of it's hard for me to think
Speaker 4: is entirely coincidental as the major point. But yeah, the
Speaker 4: slow roll of Dw's is effectively taking place before our rise,
Speaker 4: and at this point it's it's hard not to acknowledge it.
Speaker 4: So with this basically my plugs you already know I
Speaker 4: love you guys. Underclass podcast check it out. And I
Speaker 4: think we just got done with episode fifty five of
Speaker 4: whatever this is, and and it was a blast as always,
Speaker 4: And I think check out the episode I did with
Speaker 4: Jacob as well on the Satanic Panic, because it was
Speaker 4: a lot of fun and you know, specifically got into
Speaker 4: a few things that are very new to me, and
Speaker 4: I hadn't ever witnessed or come across before in the past,
Speaker 4: so kind of valuable.
Speaker 17: But anyway, during Hallen, FEMA rescuers had to back away
Speaker 17: for a few days when there were fears that militias
Speaker 17: were coming to hunt them. Also, a wild room spread
Speaker 17: that the government actually created Hurricane Helene using weather monitoring
Speaker 17: towers as a weather weapon.
Speaker 16: Now this is a directed energy weapon, utilize and manipulate
Speaker 16: the weather.
Speaker 8: These are weapons and mass destruction.
Speaker 2: So basically the rumor was that you know, the government
Speaker 2: controls the weather and that this was a direct attack
Speaker 2: on the area.
Speaker 17: Is this usual now in disasters?
Speaker 18: One that there are these false rumors conspiracies being spread,
Speaker 18: and two that outside groups to stream in and make
Speaker 18: it more difficult for law enforcement.
Speaker 13: So what I'm afraid of is, from what I've seen,
Speaker 13: this will be the new normal.
Speaker 17: During Helene, FEMA rescuers had to back away for a
Speaker 17: few days when there were fears that militias were coming
Speaker 17: to hunt them. Also, a wild rumor spread that the
Speaker 17: government actually created Hurricane Helene using weather monitoring towers as
Speaker 17: a weather weapon.
Speaker 4: Now this is a directed energy web. They're just replaying
Speaker 4: it obviously, But the point is, this is the slow role,
Speaker 4: right to actually acknowledging the fact that these directed energy
Speaker 4: weapons and weather warfare and weather modification techniques have been
Speaker 4: deployed for honestly and for sixty minutes to cover this
Speaker 4: and in this way, obviously, it's interesting that the slow
Speaker 4: role concept in my mind plays out in the form
Speaker 4: of dangerous rumors and conspiracy theories being the framework, right,
Speaker 4: And that is what caught my attention, because that's what
Speaker 4: makes it feel like it's more of a slow role subconsciously,
Speaker 4: this is definitely taking root in many people's minds, is
Speaker 4: the main point that I hope to get across. And
Speaker 4: so all of these things simultaneously kind of being layered
Speaker 4: in to one concept that will subcond have an effect
Speaker 4: and it will have a kind of widespread impact and
Speaker 4: at the very least soften up the foundation of acceptable
Speaker 4: concepts that they hope for many people to kind of
Speaker 4: be willing to consider. So it is the preordained trap,
Speaker 4: the preordained outcome in many ways. So it remains skeptical
Speaker 4: as always an objective as much as you can and
Speaker 4: nothing belove on my end.
Speaker 11: Brother, you know this?
Speaker 7: Hell yeah, brother, with that, guys, we're gonna go ahead
Speaker 7: and hang out with our patrons, you beautiful bastards. For
Speaker 7: those whoant to support what I'm doing, leave a like, share, subscribe, common,
Speaker 7: leave a five star I youw on iTunes or Spotify.
Speaker 7: You can find the show on YouTube, Rumble, all the
Speaker 7: major audio podcasters, and Twitter as well. On Twitter that's
Speaker 7: at Targang Jose. Everywhere else it's the No Way Jose podcast.
Speaker 7: And if you want to support the show, the best
Speaker 7: way you can you do with the money over at
Speaker 7: patreon dot com. So there's no Way Hose twenty twenty
Speaker 7: lowes levels two bucks that gives you access to early
Speaker 7: episodes or tried to do but one to two episodes
Speaker 7: per week behind the paywall, keep about three to four
Speaker 7: behind the paywall on any given time you also, guys,
Speaker 7: you also get access to add fore RSS feed, gax's
Speaker 7: the Telegram, and the pre show, post show and video
Speaker 7: calls on this wonderful show right here already dead that
Speaker 7: she goes out on Tuesdays at nine and thirty pm
Speaker 7: Eastern and also a big show. The high sto of
Speaker 7: my Patreon it's my sponsors is a big thank you
Speaker 7: for their support my previous cost Coast and Tire Gang
Speaker 7: at lern Toad. Also at abreget D's at zeob yours
Speaker 7: k at Underscore of zeal tim Till a joint Cleobo
Speaker 7: Big Family Show Tour May at Wain, Texas Montograf for kids.
Speaker 7: No free launch jack Mark Vestipu will wait in Jacob
Speaker 7: Indergrad the Biblical Inerarchy Podcast.
Speaker 8: With that, guys, we'll see you on the next one.
Speaker 8: I should be back in for dump tomorrow morning.
Speaker 7: Sorry, my dryer broke and had some other stuff going
Speaker 7: on this morning, so it wasn't able to make the dump.
Speaker 7: But we're good now. I should be back tomorrow. We
Speaker 7: should have some fun things to dig into together.
Speaker 9: Uh.
Speaker 8: But with that, guys, we'll see you on the next one.
Speaker 9: Bye bye,