WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Separation is kind of just an illusion. We create separation

2
00:00:03.240 --> 00:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>between things, but reality is one thing that you are

3
00:00:06.240 --> 00:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>your experience.

4
00:00:08.160 --> 00:00:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Hey, this is Remco.

5
00:00:09.119 --> 00:00:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for clicking on a video.

6
00:00:10.480 --> 00:00:12.720
<v Speaker 2>This is my brand new podcast called Face the Ace,

7
00:00:12.880 --> 00:00:15.000
<v Speaker 2>in which I talked to the most interesting people in

8
00:00:15.039 --> 00:00:18.280
<v Speaker 2>poker and go a little deeper into the topics you

9
00:00:18.320 --> 00:00:22.839
<v Speaker 2>most care about. Enjoy. I have a fellow recent dad

10
00:00:22.879 --> 00:00:26.399
<v Speaker 2>with me millions and earnings, written books. He's done it all,

11
00:00:26.960 --> 00:00:28.719
<v Speaker 2>but we still have tons of talk about even though

12
00:00:28.960 --> 00:00:31.359
<v Speaker 2>I've known this guy for such a long time. Andrew Lichtenberger,

13
00:00:31.519 --> 00:00:35.079
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the show. I'm so happy to have you.

14
00:00:35.159 --> 00:00:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Just to start off with what has today been like

15
00:00:38.039 --> 00:00:40.079
<v Speaker 2>in dad life? I won the latest chapter.

16
00:00:41.039 --> 00:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I just got back to Vegas last night, my wife, myself,

17
00:00:44.920 --> 00:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>my brother, and my daughter at one am last night,

18
00:00:48.640 --> 00:00:51.799
<v Speaker 1>so we were in New York. So today was unpacking,

19
00:00:51.960 --> 00:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>getting things sort of back in order. Yeah, I mean

20
00:00:54.920 --> 00:00:56.719
<v Speaker 1>it's always a new adventure. We were setting up some

21
00:00:56.719 --> 00:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>pack and plays for the baby so we can have

22
00:00:58.600 --> 00:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>somewhere to put her because she's getting a lot more

23
00:01:00.240 --> 00:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>mobile now. I don't know how old is your.

24
00:01:02.960 --> 00:01:05.159
<v Speaker 2>My son is turning one at the end of May.

25
00:01:05.319 --> 00:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Yeah, so you're a few months ahead of us.

26
00:01:08.239 --> 00:01:10.879
<v Speaker 1>You know what that's like. Yeah, yeah, ye're pretty quick.

27
00:01:11.120 --> 00:01:12.879
<v Speaker 1>They are pretty quick. They're very resourceful.

28
00:01:13.359 --> 00:01:17.599
<v Speaker 2>It's just awesome to have noticed the shift in the

29
00:01:17.599 --> 00:01:21.879
<v Speaker 2>way I approach life just by having another human involved.

30
00:01:21.959 --> 00:01:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, But I feel as though, out of all

31
00:01:24.319 --> 00:01:27.159
<v Speaker 2>the people that I'll interview on the show, you are

32
00:01:27.159 --> 00:01:31.480
<v Speaker 2>probably mentally prepared for every type of scenario because you've

33
00:01:31.519 --> 00:01:33.840
<v Speaker 2>been so involved with mindfulness, You've been so involved with

34
00:01:33.959 --> 00:01:36.879
<v Speaker 2>sort of learning more about yourself and the universe, to

35
00:01:37.000 --> 00:01:40.040
<v Speaker 2>just put it that way, Maybe there's many universes we

36
00:01:40.079 --> 00:01:43.959
<v Speaker 2>don't even know. But would you say that any of

37
00:01:44.000 --> 00:01:46.519
<v Speaker 2>the things that you've gone through on a personal level

38
00:01:46.799 --> 00:01:49.879
<v Speaker 2>have sort of set you up for success to become

39
00:01:50.000 --> 00:01:54.439
<v Speaker 2>a father or is it perhaps something so different that

40
00:01:54.920 --> 00:01:57.120
<v Speaker 2>even you could not have anticipated how that would feel

41
00:01:57.239 --> 00:01:59.040
<v Speaker 2>and sort of develop.

42
00:01:59.480 --> 00:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>That's a really question. I do think that my I

43
00:02:03.400 --> 00:02:06.799
<v Speaker 1>would say, willingness to be open and just sort of

44
00:02:06.840 --> 00:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>accept the uncertainty of life and the adventure that's naturally

45
00:02:10.599 --> 00:02:16.439
<v Speaker 1>present in it does prepare me for the Yeah, just

46
00:02:16.599 --> 00:02:21.479
<v Speaker 1>unusual things that happen and will probably increasingly occur as

47
00:02:21.560 --> 00:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a parent. But I will say that I probably over

48
00:02:26.080 --> 00:02:28.719
<v Speaker 1>exaggerated in my head how different it was going to

49
00:02:28.800 --> 00:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>be because I found it striking in the first Like,

50
00:02:31.639 --> 00:02:34.719
<v Speaker 1>let's just say month, how many things were the same,

51
00:02:34.960 --> 00:02:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Like I was totally prepared for my entire life to

52
00:02:37.400 --> 00:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>come crashing down and just something totally new to happen.

53
00:02:40.960 --> 00:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>It was like, oh, well, I'm still me, my wife's

54
00:02:43.120 --> 00:02:44.719
<v Speaker 1>still her, we still live in the same house, you

55
00:02:44.759 --> 00:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. So I guess a bit of both.

56
00:02:47.000 --> 00:02:50.319
<v Speaker 1>But it's been really fun and yeah, I just melt

57
00:02:50.319 --> 00:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>every time she smiles and laughs, and it's it's just incredible.

58
00:02:53.560 --> 00:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just loving it.

59
00:02:55.599 --> 00:02:57.680
<v Speaker 2>We could do like POGs podcast, so we can go

60
00:02:57.719 --> 00:03:00.840
<v Speaker 2>deep on that. That's probably worth another a couple of

61
00:03:01.039 --> 00:03:03.080
<v Speaker 2>chapters and seasons as the years go on, so we'll

62
00:03:03.159 --> 00:03:05.639
<v Speaker 2>keep every when you're ready, Yeah, exactly, we can totally

63
00:03:05.639 --> 00:03:09.439
<v Speaker 2>do that. But there there are sort of a larger

64
00:03:09.719 --> 00:03:15.639
<v Speaker 2>topic at hand that ties into the uniqueness of your

65
00:03:15.680 --> 00:03:18.639
<v Speaker 2>position in poker from the way I see it, because

66
00:03:18.680 --> 00:03:22.560
<v Speaker 2>obviously you're very much involved on the on the solver side,

67
00:03:22.599 --> 00:03:26.039
<v Speaker 2>the studying side, and trying to become the best possible player,

68
00:03:26.400 --> 00:03:31.360
<v Speaker 2>and then you have this highly contrasting sort of look

69
00:03:31.400 --> 00:03:33.639
<v Speaker 2>on life and and and approach to life, and you know,

70
00:03:33.719 --> 00:03:35.759
<v Speaker 2>the yoga of poker and the camp set. We can

71
00:03:35.759 --> 00:03:38.240
<v Speaker 2>talk about all that stuff, but to me, it almost

72
00:03:38.360 --> 00:03:43.280
<v Speaker 2>feels like so polarizing in how those things can be

73
00:03:43.360 --> 00:03:47.680
<v Speaker 2>so different and that spectrum could be so wide. Why

74
00:03:47.719 --> 00:03:51.560
<v Speaker 2>do you think it is that you fit into both

75
00:03:51.680 --> 00:03:55.599
<v Speaker 2>those sort of boxes, if you will, because I don't

76
00:03:55.599 --> 00:03:57.800
<v Speaker 2>think you could find many people that that that fit

77
00:03:57.879 --> 00:03:58.319
<v Speaker 2>those both.

78
00:03:58.599 --> 00:04:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I I appreciate you acknowledging that. I do

79
00:04:05.840 --> 00:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>recognize that it can appear to be very contrasted, and

80
00:04:09.680 --> 00:04:11.199
<v Speaker 1>in a sense it is. But the way I see

81
00:04:11.240 --> 00:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it is that they're two sides of the same coin,

82
00:04:13.680 --> 00:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and I often liken it to the left and right

83
00:04:18.839 --> 00:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>side of the brain, like one is more logical, rigid, structured,

84
00:04:22.399 --> 00:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and the other is more creative, imaginative, intuitive, And I

85
00:04:26.079 --> 00:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>think that the solvers present an opportunity to create frameworks

86
00:04:31.160 --> 00:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and understand, within a very sort of rigid framework, what

87
00:04:37.879 --> 00:04:43.639
<v Speaker 1>strategies will look like and how people can or should

88
00:04:43.639 --> 00:04:47.319
<v Speaker 1>play given those parameters. But the reality is that in poker,

89
00:04:48.160 --> 00:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't always get the luxury of having those handed

90
00:04:51.240 --> 00:04:53.879
<v Speaker 1>to you on a silver platter. In some cases you will,

91
00:04:53.879 --> 00:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>and that's you know, nice, I suppose, or easy as

92
00:04:57.319 --> 00:05:00.639
<v Speaker 1>it were. But the reason I find of this more

93
00:05:00.839 --> 00:05:04.959
<v Speaker 1>fluid way, woo way or chemist type of approach to

94
00:05:05.000 --> 00:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>be valuable is that when you're navigating uncertainty in poker,

95
00:05:09.199 --> 00:05:11.319
<v Speaker 1>like you really do, kind of have to embrace it

96
00:05:11.800 --> 00:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and just sort of figure it out on the fly,

97
00:05:15.240 --> 00:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and the structure helps, but it's not always going to

98
00:05:17.600 --> 00:05:19.399
<v Speaker 1>be the answer, and that's where I think intuition comes

99
00:05:19.439 --> 00:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>into play.

100
00:05:20.879 --> 00:05:23.480
<v Speaker 2>You did a podcast recently with Chance Cornith where you

101
00:05:23.560 --> 00:05:28.720
<v Speaker 2>specifically mentioned Sean Winter and how he does weird stuff

102
00:05:28.759 --> 00:05:30.839
<v Speaker 2>if you want to just put it very plainly, Yeah,

103
00:05:30.959 --> 00:05:34.639
<v Speaker 2>but you also said more often than not, he is right,

104
00:05:34.720 --> 00:05:37.120
<v Speaker 2>even though it should be random. Why do you use

105
00:05:37.199 --> 00:05:39.680
<v Speaker 2>him as an example and not yourself? Do you feel

106
00:05:39.720 --> 00:05:43.319
<v Speaker 2>like your intuition needs needs a lot more work. Do

107
00:05:43.720 --> 00:05:46.600
<v Speaker 2>you see him as a very intuitive person, as something

108
00:05:46.639 --> 00:05:48.560
<v Speaker 2>that he naturally possesses.

109
00:05:48.639 --> 00:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>How do you look at that?

110
00:05:50.199 --> 00:05:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Well?

111
00:05:50.360 --> 00:05:52.759
<v Speaker 1>I do think he is very intuitive. I think he's

112
00:05:52.759 --> 00:05:55.759
<v Speaker 1>probably leaned into it to a greater extent than myself

113
00:05:55.800 --> 00:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>or other players over time. I think that's an interesting

114
00:05:58.839 --> 00:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of topic generally, is how much are players willing

115
00:06:02.319 --> 00:06:04.759
<v Speaker 1>to lean into it. Like Prime Ivy is sort of

116
00:06:04.800 --> 00:06:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the example that comes to mind as someone who was

117
00:06:06.839 --> 00:06:10.079
<v Speaker 1>just very deep in there. And I also think that

118
00:06:11.800 --> 00:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>because I've had this kind of funny thought like, let's

119
00:06:13.720 --> 00:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>just say, irrespective of what people believe, let's just say, hypothetically,

120
00:06:19.839 --> 00:06:22.600
<v Speaker 1>there is some Yogi and the Hamalias meditating right now,

121
00:06:22.720 --> 00:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and if we just brought him in this state of

122
00:06:24.800 --> 00:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>zen to the Pokerro studio, would his intuition actually like

123
00:06:29.040 --> 00:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>accomplish anything or would the lack of understanding of the

124
00:06:32.519 --> 00:06:35.879
<v Speaker 1>structure of the game hold him back? And I'm inclined

125
00:06:35.920 --> 00:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to believe that the latter is more likely. And that's

126
00:06:38.920 --> 00:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>where I think that, you know, going back to like

127
00:06:41.120 --> 00:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a Prime Ivy, he probably didn't have as much of

128
00:06:43.720 --> 00:06:45.959
<v Speaker 1>a theoretical basis. He would have obviously had a deep

129
00:06:46.040 --> 00:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the game, but as you know, the industry

130
00:06:49.240 --> 00:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>has changed and more ideas become commonplace and more access

131
00:06:52.680 --> 00:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>to information is present. I do feel that intuition, it's

132
00:06:58.279 --> 00:07:00.519
<v Speaker 1>not that you have to temper it by but I

133
00:07:00.519 --> 00:07:05.879
<v Speaker 1>think it's boosted by a theoretical understanding that one has

134
00:07:06.319 --> 00:07:08.319
<v Speaker 1>and the topic of like how deep can you go

135
00:07:08.399 --> 00:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>with it? So I don't know. It's something I've thought

136
00:07:11.680 --> 00:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot about. I think there's always room for improvement

137
00:07:14.680 --> 00:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>with anything strategically or intuitively, and I just always am

138
00:07:17.959 --> 00:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to improve in that right lect.

139
00:07:19.480 --> 00:07:24.279
<v Speaker 2>But I find that so fascinating because, as some people know,

140
00:07:24.319 --> 00:07:26.920
<v Speaker 2>I've lost a lot of weight over time. And this

141
00:07:27.040 --> 00:07:29.360
<v Speaker 2>is relevant because a lot of times when I talk

142
00:07:29.399 --> 00:07:33.439
<v Speaker 2>to people about health and lifestyle changes, the biggest thing

143
00:07:33.439 --> 00:07:36.079
<v Speaker 2>that I like to focus on is that you shouldn't

144
00:07:36.240 --> 00:07:39.000
<v Speaker 2>be majoring in the miners as far as don't focus

145
00:07:39.000 --> 00:07:42.439
<v Speaker 2>on the details, do the big things right. To me,

146
00:07:42.560 --> 00:07:48.199
<v Speaker 2>it almost feels like the miners are that intuition, that

147
00:07:48.360 --> 00:07:50.879
<v Speaker 2>last little push, the last little extra. If you're not

148
00:07:50.920 --> 00:07:54.079
<v Speaker 2>doing the majors right, which is the studying and the

149
00:07:54.079 --> 00:07:56.839
<v Speaker 2>theory based and the fundamentals, you never even have to

150
00:07:56.879 --> 00:08:00.319
<v Speaker 2>worry about the intuition because that is sort of like

151
00:08:00.399 --> 00:08:03.240
<v Speaker 2>the cherry on top that you develop over time because

152
00:08:03.240 --> 00:08:06.279
<v Speaker 2>of repetition and and and and you know, talent and

153
00:08:06.480 --> 00:08:10.079
<v Speaker 2>all those kinds of things. Do you think that people

154
00:08:10.160 --> 00:08:15.079
<v Speaker 2>can sort of start to tap into that sort of

155
00:08:15.839 --> 00:08:20.879
<v Speaker 2>final set of additional skills or perhaps intuition once they

156
00:08:20.920 --> 00:08:22.879
<v Speaker 2>have that solid foundation, as you mentioned, you know, the

157
00:08:22.959 --> 00:08:24.800
<v Speaker 2>yogi probably wouldn't do that well at the book table.

158
00:08:25.319 --> 00:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's an interesting it's an interesting way to look

159
00:08:29.120 --> 00:08:33.799
<v Speaker 1>at it. I'm inclined to think that intuition has more

160
00:08:35.440 --> 00:08:37.039
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I want to say more value

161
00:08:37.200 --> 00:08:41.919
<v Speaker 1>or more relevant than it being like a final push.

162
00:08:41.960 --> 00:08:47.399
<v Speaker 1>I feel that it's always valuable, especially as it pertains

163
00:08:47.399 --> 00:08:51.559
<v Speaker 1>to just executing at the table, irrespective of what level

164
00:08:51.559 --> 00:08:55.759
<v Speaker 1>you're playing at. But yeah, I'm not I'm not sure.

165
00:08:55.840 --> 00:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can't really quantify it, and it's also

166
00:08:58.960 --> 00:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe a bit challenging to speak generally on it because

167
00:09:01.720 --> 00:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I am going to be biased by my own experience

168
00:09:04.639 --> 00:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>with it, and it is something that's very authentic to me.

169
00:09:07.799 --> 00:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Feel very inclined towards it being something that is not

170
00:09:10.879 --> 00:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>just the final push, that it's kind of always finding

171
00:09:13.879 --> 00:09:17.759
<v Speaker 1>a way. For example, like with solver strategies, so many

172
00:09:17.799 --> 00:09:22.519
<v Speaker 1>decisions are mixed, and furthermore, the models are fairly fragile

173
00:09:22.519 --> 00:09:24.519
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of cases, and if you make a

174
00:09:24.559 --> 00:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>few assumptions, then they'll shift dramatically. And you make more

175
00:09:28.919 --> 00:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>larger assumptions and they'll shift even more dramatically. And I

176
00:09:32.159 --> 00:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>think that that's where I see intuition has a lot

177
00:09:35.720 --> 00:09:41.159
<v Speaker 1>of value in being able to make those adjustments without

178
00:09:42.519 --> 00:09:45.679
<v Speaker 1>having a sort of premeditated approach to a spot.

179
00:09:46.440 --> 00:09:50.399
<v Speaker 2>When you think back to when poker was easy, so

180
00:09:50.519 --> 00:09:54.159
<v Speaker 2>to say, right when talent and hard work and having

181
00:09:54.200 --> 00:09:56.480
<v Speaker 2>a few friends you can discuss hands with was enough

182
00:09:56.519 --> 00:09:59.919
<v Speaker 2>to really do very well. Do you think that you're

183
00:10:00.120 --> 00:10:04.799
<v Speaker 2>general mindset then could have could have been like applied

184
00:10:05.080 --> 00:10:07.240
<v Speaker 2>to be successful in the current state of the game,

185
00:10:07.559 --> 00:10:10.120
<v Speaker 2>or do you think that the entire progression you went

186
00:10:10.159 --> 00:10:13.200
<v Speaker 2>through was necessary to still be successful now?

187
00:10:13.799 --> 00:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Hmmm? I think yeah, I mean I think I could.

188
00:10:17.039 --> 00:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I could still be successful if I didn't change that much,

189
00:10:19.919 --> 00:10:25.039
<v Speaker 1>but it would be rocky road, that's for sure. But

190
00:10:25.159 --> 00:10:28.279
<v Speaker 1>I did not always But there was a certain point.

191
00:10:28.360 --> 00:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you exactly when it was, but I

192
00:10:32.120 --> 00:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>have valued for a long time, like the understanding of

193
00:10:36.240 --> 00:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>structure and the willingness to deviate from it when appropriate.

194
00:10:42.080 --> 00:10:45.159
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, in the early days, having like

195
00:10:45.320 --> 00:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>any structure, even just being able to sort of conceptualize

196
00:10:49.080 --> 00:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>what the fundamentals of poker might look like and how

197
00:10:52.200 --> 00:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to build strategies around these, you know, cohesive or coherent ideas.

198
00:10:57.600 --> 00:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>That was such a huge leg up back then, and

199
00:11:00.519 --> 00:11:03.399
<v Speaker 1>that was something that was largely innate for me. I

200
00:11:03.879 --> 00:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>guess I could say I got lucky with it, but

201
00:11:05.360 --> 00:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just sort of probably influence from my parents in

202
00:11:10.399 --> 00:11:12.759
<v Speaker 1>some sense, and just sort of the game or brain

203
00:11:12.840 --> 00:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that I have.

204
00:11:14.320 --> 00:11:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, But is it like talent and intuition and perhaps

205
00:11:18.480 --> 00:11:21.360
<v Speaker 2>maybe some some pattern recognition to where you know, just

206
00:11:21.399 --> 00:11:24.720
<v Speaker 2>through repetitions, even though you're not you know, studied in

207
00:11:24.720 --> 00:11:28.159
<v Speaker 2>like a clinical sense, you're improving almost like on a

208
00:11:28.200 --> 00:11:30.399
<v Speaker 2>daily basis, even though you might not be conscious of

209
00:11:30.399 --> 00:11:31.080
<v Speaker 2>that improvement.

210
00:11:32.080 --> 00:11:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, I think anytime you're immersed in something,

211
00:11:34.919 --> 00:11:36.919
<v Speaker 1>you're probably going to continue to improve as long as

212
00:11:36.919 --> 00:11:39.759
<v Speaker 1>you're open, right and reflective of what's happening.

213
00:11:40.039 --> 00:11:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Right. So, then in that sort of early era, were

214
00:11:44.399 --> 00:11:47.399
<v Speaker 2>there key moments you remember or key people that you

215
00:11:47.919 --> 00:11:51.799
<v Speaker 2>met that in hindsight turned out to be sort of

216
00:11:51.799 --> 00:11:55.799
<v Speaker 2>pivotal towards your continued growth in the game, like instances

217
00:11:56.000 --> 00:11:58.159
<v Speaker 2>or people that contributed, And if you have examples of that.

218
00:11:58.720 --> 00:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean the one example that comes to mind

219
00:12:01.159 --> 00:12:03.639
<v Speaker 1>is I was playing an online session, which was you know,

220
00:12:03.799 --> 00:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>part for the course. I was playing probably almost every day,

221
00:12:07.039 --> 00:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and I just remember I had the spot I had

222
00:12:08.879 --> 00:12:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Ace Queen on an ACE high board. Maybe it was

223
00:12:10.799 --> 00:12:12.919
<v Speaker 1>a three bet pot, maybe it was a single race pot.

224
00:12:13.279 --> 00:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't really remember, but it was some like ACE

225
00:12:16.519 --> 00:12:18.799
<v Speaker 1>nine deuce rainbow, just some dry spot. I just felt

226
00:12:18.840 --> 00:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>like bad about it, and I was like, huh, this

227
00:12:22.519 --> 00:12:26.559
<v Speaker 1>is weird. I, you know, previous to this moment, because

228
00:12:26.559 --> 00:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>this was somewhat of a watershed experience for me, I

229
00:12:29.120 --> 00:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>just didn't really either have the awareness of what these

230
00:12:34.600 --> 00:12:38.159
<v Speaker 1>intuitive signals would be or care to delve into them.

231
00:12:38.759 --> 00:12:41.759
<v Speaker 1>But I checked it back and then I ended up

232
00:12:41.799 --> 00:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>losing a smaller pot than I would have and my

233
00:12:43.759 --> 00:12:47.519
<v Speaker 1>opponent had Ace king. I was like, Okay, that's pretty interesting,

234
00:12:47.799 --> 00:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and then I just sort of kept an eye out

235
00:12:49.480 --> 00:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>for when that similar signal would come. And I guess

236
00:12:52.639 --> 00:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>over the years, I've valued what those signals look and

237
00:12:57.120 --> 00:12:59.799
<v Speaker 1>feel like, and I have oscillated. There's been times where

238
00:12:59.840 --> 00:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I basically I have gas lit myself

239
00:13:02.240 --> 00:13:04.879
<v Speaker 1>into thinking that like that's not real, and then I

240
00:13:04.919 --> 00:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>have to like touch the hot stove and realize that

241
00:13:07.120 --> 00:13:10.519
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't feel good. So it's been a journey. But yeah,

242
00:13:10.559 --> 00:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's fascinating because I do think that

243
00:13:14.360 --> 00:13:16.759
<v Speaker 1>I was more naturally predisposed to just like a purely

244
00:13:16.799 --> 00:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>logical approach. As far as people I met over the

245
00:13:19.799 --> 00:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>years who would have maybe assisted in that, gosh, I

246
00:13:25.879 --> 00:13:28.919
<v Speaker 1>mean really so many people. I can't pick any out

247
00:13:28.960 --> 00:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in particular, but from the generation I came up in

248
00:13:32.799 --> 00:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>before solvers, there was no I mean, there was some

249
00:13:36.279 --> 00:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>convergence around ideas, but there was a lot. Yeah, there's

250
00:13:41.759 --> 00:13:45.519
<v Speaker 1>a lot more that was just subjects to interpretation because yeah,

251
00:13:45.519 --> 00:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>everyone was just sort of figuring it out of the fly. Yeah,

252
00:13:47.360 --> 00:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and I appreciate. I just added that I really did

253
00:13:49.440 --> 00:13:52.039
<v Speaker 1>appreciate when they came out, although I had some early

254
00:13:52.080 --> 00:13:55.279
<v Speaker 1>resistance because I was like, well, it's kind of nice

255
00:13:55.320 --> 00:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to be able to quantify these things that we've sort

256
00:13:57.159 --> 00:14:00.759
<v Speaker 1>of not known for a while and ruminated on. Soh yeah,

257
00:14:00.799 --> 00:14:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I just thought it was cool when it happened.

258
00:14:03.360 --> 00:14:08.200
<v Speaker 2>It's fun to like speculate on this because in a way,

259
00:14:08.919 --> 00:14:11.679
<v Speaker 2>becoming a really good poker player has never been easier

260
00:14:12.039 --> 00:14:15.399
<v Speaker 2>because the access to tools is there's so many. If

261
00:14:15.399 --> 00:14:17.159
<v Speaker 2>you wanted, you could study for a whole year before

262
00:14:17.200 --> 00:14:19.559
<v Speaker 2>even playing a single handed poker and then showing up

263
00:14:19.840 --> 00:14:24.039
<v Speaker 2>being well prepared. But back when you came up, it

264
00:14:24.120 --> 00:14:27.399
<v Speaker 2>was almost like, you know, a bunch of young kids

265
00:14:27.679 --> 00:14:31.000
<v Speaker 2>would win like satellites to PCA and epts, and they

266
00:14:31.000 --> 00:14:33.399
<v Speaker 2>would all meet and they would all find common ground.

267
00:14:33.440 --> 00:14:35.799
<v Speaker 2>They're all like, you know, under the age of twenty

268
00:14:36.039 --> 00:14:40.159
<v Speaker 2>and become instant best friends. And that sort of group

269
00:14:40.679 --> 00:14:45.000
<v Speaker 2>pushed themselves to a very high level, very quickly in

270
00:14:45.080 --> 00:14:48.759
<v Speaker 2>relation to the field totally. How do you look at

271
00:14:48.759 --> 00:14:53.320
<v Speaker 2>those two different ways to reach the top, Because you know,

272
00:14:53.600 --> 00:14:57.679
<v Speaker 2>the case can be made that the access now is

273
00:14:57.759 --> 00:15:01.159
<v Speaker 2>what's crucial to reach the top, but also it's harder

274
00:15:01.159 --> 00:15:03.000
<v Speaker 2>than ever because the competition is so strong.

275
00:15:03.960 --> 00:15:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's a good point. The access to information is

276
00:15:06.919 --> 00:15:09.879
<v Speaker 1>just going to be helpful if someone's like newer to poker,

277
00:15:10.559 --> 00:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>And I do think it's always been a possibility to

278
00:15:13.039 --> 00:15:15.519
<v Speaker 1>start from scratch and make it to the highest stakes.

279
00:15:16.919 --> 00:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>And I would even add that because there is a

280
00:15:19.639 --> 00:15:23.519
<v Speaker 1>more ubiquitous understanding of poker theory and you can just

281
00:15:23.559 --> 00:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>figure things out if you want to. To me, that,

282
00:15:27.080 --> 00:15:31.519
<v Speaker 1>by contrast, highlights the importance of intuition and execution and

283
00:15:31.559 --> 00:15:34.159
<v Speaker 1>all the soft skills that go along with understanding the

284
00:15:34.159 --> 00:15:37.399
<v Speaker 1>structure of the game, because not that everybody will have

285
00:15:37.440 --> 00:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the same understanding. That's clearly not the case. There's so

286
00:15:40.440 --> 00:15:42.799
<v Speaker 1>much nuance to it, and the game tree is huge,

287
00:15:42.840 --> 00:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>But if people are generally converging around similar ish ideas,

288
00:15:47.799 --> 00:15:49.919
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well, what will give you an adage? What

289
00:15:50.080 --> 00:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>is like the next frontier so to speak? And to

290
00:15:52.519 --> 00:15:54.799
<v Speaker 1>me it is all those soft skills.

291
00:15:57.000 --> 00:15:59.639
<v Speaker 2>From the guys you've seen come up in like, let's say,

292
00:15:59.720 --> 00:16:02.679
<v Speaker 2>less five years that you know are playing in the

293
00:16:02.679 --> 00:16:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Pocco studio or you know you see him at like

294
00:16:05.240 --> 00:16:09.799
<v Speaker 2>big final tables across the country or even internationally. Can

295
00:16:09.840 --> 00:16:13.000
<v Speaker 2>you pinpoint to something having played against those players that

296
00:16:13.240 --> 00:16:17.159
<v Speaker 2>sort of has given them the opportunity to reach the top?

297
00:16:17.320 --> 00:16:20.279
<v Speaker 2>Do you see something in their playing style, or in

298
00:16:20.320 --> 00:16:23.679
<v Speaker 2>their you know, social skills, or in perhaps something you

299
00:16:23.679 --> 00:16:25.720
<v Speaker 2>know from talking to them that that sort of sets

300
00:16:25.759 --> 00:16:29.039
<v Speaker 2>them apart from perhaps others from their generation who have

301
00:16:29.120 --> 00:16:29.639
<v Speaker 2>not made it.

302
00:16:30.440 --> 00:16:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean the first name that comes to mind

303
00:16:33.200 --> 00:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>is Jesse Lanis. I think he started kind of competing

304
00:16:36.759 --> 00:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in like mid to higher stakes tournaments around COVID. You

305
00:16:40.039 --> 00:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>know when I first met him. Not trying to burche

306
00:16:43.879 --> 00:16:46.679
<v Speaker 1>hate on the gorilla, I love him, but I was skeptical.

307
00:16:46.720 --> 00:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's just playing like pretty different than most people.

308
00:16:49.919 --> 00:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>And that was probably around the time that I was

309
00:16:51.320 --> 00:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>stuck in a more rigid kind of mindset. But I mean,

310
00:16:55.519 --> 00:16:57.679
<v Speaker 1>he has great soft skills, There's just no two ways

311
00:16:57.679 --> 00:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>about it, and he it is just a great card player.

312
00:17:02.120 --> 00:17:03.919
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day. That's actually really what

313
00:17:04.119 --> 00:17:07.640
<v Speaker 1>matters because we're playing cards. So I do think that

314
00:17:08.160 --> 00:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>just as much as it was true back in the

315
00:17:10.000 --> 00:17:13.319
<v Speaker 1>day when we were winning PCA packages and whatnot, it

316
00:17:13.359 --> 00:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>really does always come down like poker is not like

317
00:17:16.599 --> 00:17:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a multiple choice like quiz. It's a dynamic environment where

318
00:17:21.160 --> 00:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to be willing to trust yourself and make

319
00:17:26.119 --> 00:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>bizarre sort of moves that might only make sense in

320
00:17:29.400 --> 00:17:32.799
<v Speaker 1>a very unique context. And he does clearly trust himself

321
00:17:32.799 --> 00:17:35.519
<v Speaker 1>and is willing to make those plays, and that's clearly

322
00:17:35.559 --> 00:17:37.799
<v Speaker 1>benefited him a lot over the last few years.

323
00:17:38.799 --> 00:17:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Is it possible to learn from a player by watching

324
00:17:41.960 --> 00:17:44.640
<v Speaker 2>them play or talking in hands with them if they

325
00:17:44.680 --> 00:17:47.839
<v Speaker 2>are so unconventional? And I think back of a memory

326
00:17:47.880 --> 00:17:51.079
<v Speaker 2>that I have where I believe was Patrick Antonius trying

327
00:17:51.119 --> 00:17:53.640
<v Speaker 2>to do a training video and it was really funny

328
00:17:53.640 --> 00:17:56.240
<v Speaker 2>because you know, he clearly knew what to do, but

329
00:17:56.319 --> 00:17:58.880
<v Speaker 2>he didn't really know one hundred percent how to sort

330
00:17:58.880 --> 00:18:01.960
<v Speaker 2>of lay it out in that sort of way that

331
00:18:02.119 --> 00:18:05.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, you guys would do on your training sites.

332
00:18:06.119 --> 00:18:08.319
<v Speaker 2>Not to throw shade at Patrick, of course, it's one

333
00:18:08.359 --> 00:18:11.279
<v Speaker 2>of those things where, you know, intuition, like the way

334
00:18:11.440 --> 00:18:14.119
<v Speaker 2>you described Ivy for example, or Sean Winter, sometimes they

335
00:18:14.119 --> 00:18:17.920
<v Speaker 2>do things that might not be the common line, and

336
00:18:18.119 --> 00:18:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Jesse Loanis is probably.

337
00:18:19.039 --> 00:18:19.599
<v Speaker 1>A good example.

338
00:18:19.640 --> 00:18:23.960
<v Speaker 2>But back to my question, are there learning opportunities in

339
00:18:24.039 --> 00:18:26.920
<v Speaker 2>that even though it might be a little bit of

340
00:18:27.079 --> 00:18:29.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, sort of wide magic type situation.

341
00:18:30.000 --> 00:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, it's a really good question. I think it

342
00:18:31.519 --> 00:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>highlights something interesting about intuition that it will give you

343
00:18:35.960 --> 00:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a signal and it sometimes is up to you to

344
00:18:40.039 --> 00:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>trust it or not trust it, but then to sort

345
00:18:42.480 --> 00:18:45.519
<v Speaker 1>of back engineer it and figure out like why did

346
00:18:45.519 --> 00:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>this make sense in context? And I think that in

347
00:18:49.400 --> 00:18:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the case of you know, learning from someone like Jesse

348
00:18:52.599 --> 00:18:55.599
<v Speaker 1>or the Patrick training video, it's going to be a

349
00:18:55.599 --> 00:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit more cryptic because there's not as clearly find

350
00:19:01.400 --> 00:19:03.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of parameters and rules as to why they're operating.

351
00:19:04.039 --> 00:19:07.559
<v Speaker 1>But in general, I mean all winning players are going

352
00:19:07.599 --> 00:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>to converge around some similar ideas. An example I like

353
00:19:11.400 --> 00:19:14.839
<v Speaker 1>about this is you're familiar with Mikhael Tall. He was

354
00:19:14.880 --> 00:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>like a prolific chess player, Yeah, and he was known

355
00:19:17.240 --> 00:19:21.400
<v Speaker 1>for his like elaborate sacrifices and exotic sort of play style.

356
00:19:22.160 --> 00:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>But to get to that level, you're going to draw

357
00:19:24.000 --> 00:19:27.039
<v Speaker 1>a lot of games against gms and play fairly sound

358
00:19:27.039 --> 00:19:31.279
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of spots. And I think that like Prime,

359
00:19:31.279 --> 00:19:34.599
<v Speaker 1>Adamo or Fade or even like, there was a lot

360
00:19:34.680 --> 00:19:38.599
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of hype around some of these. I

361
00:19:38.599 --> 00:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>think exotic is a good word to describe the plays

362
00:19:40.680 --> 00:19:43.039
<v Speaker 1>they would make, But most of the time they're just

363
00:19:43.240 --> 00:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>playing like good standard poker. They're just willing to push

364
00:19:45.920 --> 00:19:48.519
<v Speaker 1>the boundaries in some cases, and those you know that

365
00:19:48.519 --> 00:19:50.880
<v Speaker 1>will make a big impact on one's win, right, especially

366
00:19:50.880 --> 00:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>when it goes well over a short stretch.

367
00:19:53.039 --> 00:19:56.079
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that for those types of players like Lonus,

368
00:19:56.200 --> 00:20:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Fade or Odamo, do you think that them get to

369
00:20:00.240 --> 00:20:03.079
<v Speaker 2>a certain level of fame it gives them an extra

370
00:20:03.240 --> 00:20:07.000
<v Speaker 2>edge because of the perception of their play now becoming

371
00:20:07.079 --> 00:20:10.000
<v Speaker 2>a factor where people anticipate them playing a certain style.

372
00:20:10.319 --> 00:20:13.400
<v Speaker 2>And then of course the I guess X factor being

373
00:20:13.640 --> 00:20:16.119
<v Speaker 2>can they adjust and profit from that.

374
00:20:16.319 --> 00:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I was going to mention that I think, yes,

375
00:20:19.720 --> 00:20:23.039
<v Speaker 1>it definitely will help, and especially if they're willing to

376
00:20:23.119 --> 00:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of discern how players, whether you know, pros or recreationals,

377
00:20:28.759 --> 00:20:32.160
<v Speaker 1>will feel like they're doing something that they may not

378
00:20:32.200 --> 00:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>be doing. I think that's something I heard. Joe Kata

379
00:20:35.519 --> 00:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this at one point that after he won the

380
00:20:37.279 --> 00:20:39.839
<v Speaker 1>main event, he went on like a prolonged sort of

381
00:20:39.880 --> 00:20:43.319
<v Speaker 1>downswing where he didn't realize that he just had to

382
00:20:43.359 --> 00:20:45.839
<v Speaker 1>play like he was an old man and he'd just

383
00:20:45.920 --> 00:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>constantly get paid. I think having an understanding of, yeah,

384
00:20:51.039 --> 00:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>just how people perceive you, like a meta table image

385
00:20:54.359 --> 00:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>would definitely be necessary in those cases where you're on

386
00:20:57.160 --> 00:20:57.759
<v Speaker 1>such a rip.

387
00:20:58.319 --> 00:21:02.200
<v Speaker 2>So for yourself, playing a lot in an environment where

388
00:21:02.240 --> 00:21:05.319
<v Speaker 2>you play against the same players all the time, would

389
00:21:05.359 --> 00:21:08.559
<v Speaker 2>you say that because of your intuition and the way

390
00:21:08.599 --> 00:21:12.039
<v Speaker 2>that you are able to tap into it or trust it,

391
00:21:12.160 --> 00:21:15.720
<v Speaker 2>or you know, sometimes that sort of wave hits, would

392
00:21:15.720 --> 00:21:18.319
<v Speaker 2>you say it's an advantage to you to play a

393
00:21:18.359 --> 00:21:20.839
<v Speaker 2>lot against the same people because it might strengthen those

394
00:21:20.880 --> 00:21:24.160
<v Speaker 2>feelings because you get to play against a lot of

395
00:21:24.160 --> 00:21:26.519
<v Speaker 2>the same players over and over again, where you know

396
00:21:26.599 --> 00:21:29.759
<v Speaker 2>you might even like subconsciously pick up on things towards

397
00:21:29.799 --> 00:21:30.559
<v Speaker 2>certain opponents.

398
00:21:32.359 --> 00:21:35.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I do think again, like just repetition

399
00:21:35.640 --> 00:21:41.279
<v Speaker 1>will be helpful in that respect. It's maybe tempered by

400
00:21:41.279 --> 00:21:46.039
<v Speaker 1>the fact that those are primarily great players. Yeah, so yeah,

401
00:21:46.039 --> 00:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean it depends, like what the other group would

402
00:21:48.240 --> 00:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>be if that's the control group, is the other group

403
00:21:50.039 --> 00:21:52.519
<v Speaker 1>also great players or are they like unknown? Because I

404
00:21:52.839 --> 00:21:54.759
<v Speaker 1>would do better against the unknown and for sure even

405
00:21:54.799 --> 00:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>with less data, and I would get tricked sometimes, right, Like,

406
00:21:57.720 --> 00:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is a cool thing that I think

407
00:21:59.279 --> 00:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>makes poker popular. Someone can come off the street and

408
00:22:03.319 --> 00:22:05.799
<v Speaker 1>just you know, trick an Ivy or an Agrando or

409
00:22:05.839 --> 00:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>whoever because they just you know, they just have an

410
00:22:08.480 --> 00:22:10.799
<v Speaker 1>erratic style. But yeah, over the long run, you know,

411
00:22:10.880 --> 00:22:14.759
<v Speaker 1>there'll be adjustments and clarity had how much.

412
00:22:15.000 --> 00:22:17.759
<v Speaker 2>Sort of self awareness do you have to do you

413
00:22:17.799 --> 00:22:20.079
<v Speaker 2>have to bring to the table when you're playing in

414
00:22:20.079 --> 00:22:23.160
<v Speaker 2>a field where you know you are the most known

415
00:22:23.200 --> 00:22:25.640
<v Speaker 2>player at your table, do you have to try and

416
00:22:25.759 --> 00:22:28.039
<v Speaker 2>learn whether they know who you are and does that

417
00:22:28.119 --> 00:22:30.480
<v Speaker 2>help your game? Or do you sort of have to

418
00:22:30.519 --> 00:22:34.599
<v Speaker 2>make perhaps general adjustments because you have to assume that

419
00:22:34.640 --> 00:22:37.079
<v Speaker 2>people might want to, you know, tell their friend that

420
00:22:37.079 --> 00:22:39.359
<v Speaker 2>they've bluffed luck a Chewi.

421
00:22:39.960 --> 00:22:43.319
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question. I will admit that I don't

422
00:22:43.319 --> 00:22:45.599
<v Speaker 1>think this is something that I've done the absolute best

423
00:22:45.680 --> 00:22:48.559
<v Speaker 1>job of over the course of my career. I mean,

424
00:22:48.599 --> 00:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I do think I've done well enough at that, but

425
00:22:52.480 --> 00:22:56.559
<v Speaker 1>I think that different people perceive me differently, and I

426
00:22:56.640 --> 00:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>don't always totally recognize how that might look. I guess

427
00:23:01.400 --> 00:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>strategically I sort of figure it out or get close

428
00:23:04.119 --> 00:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>enough to what the answer would be or how they

429
00:23:06.279 --> 00:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>would play in a spot. But yeah, I've often been

430
00:23:10.759 --> 00:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>surprised at things people say, like comments and passing. Like

431
00:23:15.079 --> 00:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>one that comes to mind is many people over the

432
00:23:18.079 --> 00:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>years have mentioned they feel I'm like very like mathematic

433
00:23:22.119 --> 00:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>or almost robotic, and I'm like, okay, I can see

434
00:23:24.680 --> 00:23:28.839
<v Speaker 1>why they would think that, but I don't necessary like

435
00:23:28.880 --> 00:23:31.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I do love numbers. And my wife would

436
00:23:31.839 --> 00:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>probably laugh at me telling you this, like She's like,

437
00:23:34.119 --> 00:23:36.079
<v Speaker 1>why would you be surprised by that? But it's just

438
00:23:36.119 --> 00:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>because of my own internal process around the game and

439
00:23:39.240 --> 00:23:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that I am willing to really rely on intuition in

440
00:23:42.200 --> 00:23:45.599
<v Speaker 1>key moments but in all moments really, so in a way.

441
00:23:46.480 --> 00:23:49.039
<v Speaker 2>You're you've all correct if I'm wrong, but it feels

442
00:23:49.079 --> 00:23:55.039
<v Speaker 2>like you're saying that you don't necessarily make adjustments because

443
00:23:55.039 --> 00:23:58.440
<v Speaker 2>that's almost like baked into your style because of the

444
00:23:59.079 --> 00:24:02.279
<v Speaker 2>roots being in the in the math. That sort of

445
00:24:02.279 --> 00:24:07.519
<v Speaker 2>pushes you towards perhaps randomizing or making adjustments just because

446
00:24:07.519 --> 00:24:08.799
<v Speaker 2>that's what the situation calls for.

447
00:24:09.839 --> 00:24:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Well, I just think poker is inherently a game of adjusting.

448
00:24:13.000 --> 00:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So places in which I would say I make adjustments

449
00:24:16.160 --> 00:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>would be more deviations based on ideally more concrete than

450
00:24:25.640 --> 00:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of ephemeral data. But in spots where it is

451
00:24:30.400 --> 00:24:33.559
<v Speaker 1>a mixed decision, then you can kind of go either

452
00:24:33.599 --> 00:24:37.119
<v Speaker 1>way if your assumptions are accurate enough. And that's where

453
00:24:38.000 --> 00:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>I personally think intuition has a lot of value because

454
00:24:41.160 --> 00:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well, if it's the same either way in

455
00:24:43.480 --> 00:24:46.799
<v Speaker 1>the long run, well, your opponent has two cards in

456
00:24:46.880 --> 00:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>this spot. So if you can like quote unquote guess right, like,

457
00:24:50.839 --> 00:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be worthwhile.

458
00:24:54.680 --> 00:24:57.240
<v Speaker 2>How fast does the brain of someone at your level

459
00:24:57.960 --> 00:25:01.880
<v Speaker 2>process these things as the hands is developing. How much

460
00:25:01.920 --> 00:25:04.319
<v Speaker 2>of this is internal talk? How much of this is

461
00:25:04.440 --> 00:25:10.880
<v Speaker 2>perhaps just appearing in front of you. I know people

462
00:25:10.920 --> 00:25:13.720
<v Speaker 2>that have like a photographic memory, and they remember things

463
00:25:13.880 --> 00:25:15.920
<v Speaker 2>very vividly. But I also know people that have like

464
00:25:16.000 --> 00:25:19.359
<v Speaker 2>this very strong internal dialogue that sort of leads them

465
00:25:19.880 --> 00:25:22.400
<v Speaker 2>down as a decision making process. What does it look

466
00:25:22.480 --> 00:25:22.839
<v Speaker 2>like for you?

467
00:25:23.240 --> 00:25:26.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a great question to me. It's sort of

468
00:25:26.799 --> 00:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it asks like, how does intuition work on an individual basis?

469
00:25:31.279 --> 00:25:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's different day to day. It's sometimes

470
00:25:33.640 --> 00:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>different over the course of a day. I mean, I

471
00:25:37.519 --> 00:25:40.440
<v Speaker 1>suppose it's a pretty well oiled machine at this point.

472
00:25:40.640 --> 00:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>There's plenty of room for improvement. I'm not entirely clairvoyant,

473
00:25:44.960 --> 00:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to say the least, but I guess probably the physiological

474
00:25:49.519 --> 00:25:54.160
<v Speaker 1>sensations are maybe most reliable in some cases. And sometimes

475
00:25:54.160 --> 00:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>it is like an inner dialogue, and that can also

476
00:25:56.279 --> 00:25:59.839
<v Speaker 1>be very helpful, just a firm, kind of clear deck

477
00:26:00.480 --> 00:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of like this is what you should be doing here.

478
00:26:02.480 --> 00:26:09.599
<v Speaker 2>Do you, for example, memorize or reach back for memories

479
00:26:09.960 --> 00:26:12.759
<v Speaker 2>on things you've studied while things are happening in the

480
00:26:12.799 --> 00:26:16.119
<v Speaker 2>moment or is it more so almost like programmed to

481
00:26:16.160 --> 00:26:19.799
<v Speaker 2>where you see something and it triggers like almost like

482
00:26:19.799 --> 00:26:23.960
<v Speaker 2>an instinct where you know that the decision tree is

483
00:26:24.240 --> 00:26:25.240
<v Speaker 2>going in a certain direction.

484
00:26:25.519 --> 00:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's I will occasionally do the former in a

485
00:26:29.319 --> 00:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>spot where like, let's say I want to discern what

486
00:26:32.480 --> 00:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable beat size would be with my range, for example,

487
00:26:35.480 --> 00:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>but for like a hand specific, combo specific type of play,

488
00:26:39.559 --> 00:26:42.759
<v Speaker 1>I feel it's generally more the latter, where I think

489
00:26:42.759 --> 00:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the value in understanding that structure is to feed the

490
00:26:45.400 --> 00:26:49.799
<v Speaker 1>subconscious in understanding and then let the intuition just sort

491
00:26:49.799 --> 00:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of take over and mandate how should this be coalesced

492
00:26:54.359 --> 00:26:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and executed.

493
00:26:56.119 --> 00:26:59.599
<v Speaker 2>So what would you give as advice to players who

494
00:26:59.720 --> 00:27:04.079
<v Speaker 2>say I enjoy studying. I enjoy, you know, playing all

495
00:27:04.079 --> 00:27:06.880
<v Speaker 2>those solver games. I have good scores on those things,

496
00:27:07.079 --> 00:27:09.279
<v Speaker 2>but when I'm in the moment, I'm having a really

497
00:27:09.279 --> 00:27:12.680
<v Speaker 2>hard time applying it. It's almost like the solver is

498
00:27:12.759 --> 00:27:17.119
<v Speaker 2>like a video game. But then real poker is such

499
00:27:17.119 --> 00:27:20.480
<v Speaker 2>a different environment to where whether it's recall or whether

500
00:27:20.519 --> 00:27:24.200
<v Speaker 2>it's intuition is sort of lacking. So there could be

501
00:27:24.240 --> 00:27:27.400
<v Speaker 2>a situation where frustration arises when you feel like you've

502
00:27:27.400 --> 00:27:30.279
<v Speaker 2>done the work, but then applying it becomes like a

503
00:27:30.359 --> 00:27:31.119
<v Speaker 2>whole new.

504
00:27:31.000 --> 00:27:35.559
<v Speaker 1>Set of issues, totally extremely relatable for myself and many others.

505
00:27:35.640 --> 00:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>And I feel that this is kind of again where

506
00:27:38.200 --> 00:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>we get to that dichotomy of thinking versus feeling, because

507
00:27:42.000 --> 00:27:44.759
<v Speaker 1>like the thought is well established, but the feel it's

508
00:27:44.799 --> 00:27:48.759
<v Speaker 1>almost like it's been well, if not neglected, then sort

509
00:27:48.799 --> 00:27:52.279
<v Speaker 1>of disparaged in a sense. It can almost be seen

510
00:27:52.319 --> 00:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>as a weakness in many cases. And I mean I

511
00:27:56.759 --> 00:28:00.519
<v Speaker 1>suppose that although this wasn't like the main reason that

512
00:28:00.599 --> 00:28:04.039
<v Speaker 1>I built the Chemist app, but even if you don't

513
00:28:04.039 --> 00:28:08.279
<v Speaker 1>believe in extrasensory phenomena at all, just the idea that

514
00:28:08.319 --> 00:28:11.319
<v Speaker 1>you would engage in an activity where you are not

515
00:28:11.519 --> 00:28:15.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking and feeling, I think can be helpful because that's really,

516
00:28:15.440 --> 00:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to me, the heart of the matter. You have knowledge

517
00:28:19.559 --> 00:28:21.799
<v Speaker 1>and you're then in a spot where you have to

518
00:28:21.839 --> 00:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>take that knowledge in like a somewhat tense, pressure filled

519
00:28:26.359 --> 00:28:30.160
<v Speaker 1>scenario and determine, like what am I going to do

520
00:28:30.240 --> 00:28:33.279
<v Speaker 1>with this knowledge now? And I think that if you

521
00:28:33.400 --> 00:28:37.519
<v Speaker 1>ignore the fact that I mean, in a lot of cases,

522
00:28:37.559 --> 00:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I think people have emotional blocks, there's some inner conflict

523
00:28:41.519 --> 00:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>or friction or something that is preventing that progress and

524
00:28:45.319 --> 00:28:50.079
<v Speaker 1>engaging in activities like meditation, mindfulness type of things. I mean,

525
00:28:50.160 --> 00:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Chemist app can help with that if one

526
00:28:52.039 --> 00:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is reflective, but I think just generally freeing up your

527
00:28:55.440 --> 00:29:00.839
<v Speaker 1>ability to feel comfortable feeling and being to do what

528
00:29:00.880 --> 00:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you feel is correct. I think something many people have

529
00:29:05.079 --> 00:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioned and I would echo this sentiment is that you

530
00:29:07.759 --> 00:29:10.599
<v Speaker 1>really do have to not be afraid to look stupid, right,

531
00:29:10.759 --> 00:29:13.599
<v Speaker 1>because if you're afraid of looking stupid, you almost ensure

532
00:29:13.599 --> 00:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you will look stupid. Yeah, it's just

533
00:29:15.960 --> 00:29:19.039
<v Speaker 1>kind of like part of the game. And if you're

534
00:29:19.079 --> 00:29:22.039
<v Speaker 1>willing to do that, that's like almost a superpower for.

535
00:29:22.319 --> 00:29:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Those Just real quick for those that don't know about

536
00:29:24.279 --> 00:29:26.359
<v Speaker 2>the camp st and we'll link it below as well,

537
00:29:28.200 --> 00:29:28.960
<v Speaker 2>give a brief.

538
00:29:28.839 --> 00:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Description of how it works. Yeah, so it's just a

539
00:29:31.519 --> 00:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>randomly shuffled deck of cards. You are then just feeling

540
00:29:35.200 --> 00:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>which card is coming next, and you're scored based on

541
00:29:37.440 --> 00:29:39.799
<v Speaker 1>how well you guess. You get one point for the

542
00:29:39.839 --> 00:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>right suit, three for the rank, and thirteen for a

543
00:29:41.799 --> 00:29:43.799
<v Speaker 1>perfect And as you go throughout the deck, it's not

544
00:29:43.839 --> 00:29:46.480
<v Speaker 1>populating new cards, you're seeing them get grayed out, so

545
00:29:46.599 --> 00:29:48.279
<v Speaker 1>you can never pick a card that has a yeo

546
00:29:48.359 --> 00:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>percent probability of being correct.

547
00:29:50.359 --> 00:29:55.279
<v Speaker 2>Right, So it's kind of like intuition, but it's also

548
00:29:55.359 --> 00:29:59.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of like a memorization game because of the.

549
00:29:59.720 --> 00:30:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Remot cards knows you're seeing on the Street Seeker. Great app. Yeah,

550
00:30:03.799 --> 00:30:07.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a very specific form of intuition, which Heartmouth Institute

551
00:30:07.880 --> 00:30:11.559
<v Speaker 1>has designated as non local intuition. Some people would call

552
00:30:11.559 --> 00:30:15.839
<v Speaker 1>it precognition. And I just think that's fascinating. The extent

553
00:30:15.880 --> 00:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to which I'm capable of it, I'm not sure I've

554
00:30:18.720 --> 00:30:21.039
<v Speaker 1>had enough experiences where I enjoyed doing it, and I

555
00:30:21.079 --> 00:30:22.519
<v Speaker 1>was like, Okay, well, I'll just make the app. It

556
00:30:22.559 --> 00:30:25.039
<v Speaker 1>was a fun project anyway, and maybe it'll, you know,

557
00:30:25.119 --> 00:30:27.359
<v Speaker 1>be of interest to some people. My wife and I

558
00:30:27.400 --> 00:30:31.079
<v Speaker 1>actually did a one day retreat event up at Mount Charleston.

559
00:30:31.400 --> 00:30:34.359
<v Speaker 1>We got twenty people up there, and she's a Chinese

560
00:30:34.400 --> 00:30:37.119
<v Speaker 1>medical doctor and she talked about how that framework in

561
00:30:37.160 --> 00:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>philosophy relate to intuition, and we did some exercises. She's

562
00:30:40.960 --> 00:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>taught some chigong and we had a great time. But

563
00:30:43.720 --> 00:30:46.759
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's fascinating because I know that these

564
00:30:46.799 --> 00:30:52.519
<v Speaker 1>are real phenomena, and I think poker is largely an

565
00:30:52.559 --> 00:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>industry that has not embraced them at the highest levels.

566
00:30:56.720 --> 00:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>But if you talk to like any casual player, they're

567
00:31:00.000 --> 00:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty much all interested in it because of the way

568
00:31:02.720 --> 00:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that you feel in hands, and it's just a significantly

569
00:31:07.160 --> 00:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>more common sentiment in smaller stakes games. And of course,

570
00:31:10.200 --> 00:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the you know, counterpoint would be like, well, they're not experts,

571
00:31:13.720 --> 00:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>so like why would you value it? They're not playing

572
00:31:16.200 --> 00:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>at your level. But I think there's like something to

573
00:31:18.720 --> 00:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>be said for that that, you know, that's something that

574
00:31:20.920 --> 00:31:21.799
<v Speaker 1>draws people to poker.

575
00:31:24.079 --> 00:31:27.799
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, this, this whole, this whole concept and this topic,

576
00:31:28.119 --> 00:31:31.960
<v Speaker 2>it raises so many interesting thoughts with me because my

577
00:31:32.200 --> 00:31:36.960
<v Speaker 2>sort of very I guess, you know, I come from

578
00:31:36.960 --> 00:31:38.960
<v Speaker 2>a small town, and like it's kind of like this

579
00:31:39.039 --> 00:31:41.880
<v Speaker 2>rigid sort of structural thinking where you know, just you know,

580
00:31:42.119 --> 00:31:44.599
<v Speaker 2>stay normal and just like don't don't start floating through

581
00:31:44.599 --> 00:31:46.920
<v Speaker 2>the air with all your crazy thoughts. And that's like

582
00:31:46.920 --> 00:31:48.359
<v Speaker 2>the first thing that comes to mind, like come on,

583
00:31:48.400 --> 00:31:50.519
<v Speaker 2>what the hell are we talking about here? But then

584
00:31:50.559 --> 00:31:53.279
<v Speaker 2>as you go deeper into the conversation, it becomes fascinating

585
00:31:53.920 --> 00:31:55.200
<v Speaker 2>to the point where.

586
00:31:56.720 --> 00:31:57.599
<v Speaker 1>Like, you you don't.

587
00:31:57.440 --> 00:32:00.599
<v Speaker 2>Lose anything from from from trying this, and you don't

588
00:32:00.599 --> 00:32:02.200
<v Speaker 2>there's no downside.

589
00:32:01.720 --> 00:32:04.839
<v Speaker 1>So I certainly don't think so that's that's me saying that, right,

590
00:32:04.960 --> 00:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>But I believe, yeah.

591
00:32:06.079 --> 00:32:09.400
<v Speaker 2>I believe that too, because it's always good to try

592
00:32:09.440 --> 00:32:12.279
<v Speaker 2>and do new things and to like learn about stuff,

593
00:32:12.319 --> 00:32:13.119
<v Speaker 2>even if you are.

594
00:32:13.000 --> 00:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Skeptical about it.

595
00:32:14.079 --> 00:32:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Sure, but I find it funny, especially in the context

596
00:32:17.680 --> 00:32:23.319
<v Speaker 2>of poker. Yeah, because in a way it almost perfectly fits,

597
00:32:23.359 --> 00:32:24.680
<v Speaker 2>but it also perfectly doesn't fit.

598
00:32:25.039 --> 00:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, it doesn't fit because of the cultural boundaries or

599
00:32:29.000 --> 00:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the Overton window or whatever you want to call it.

600
00:32:31.079 --> 00:32:33.319
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, I mean, I

601
00:32:33.359 --> 00:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>have had a decent amount of success in poker, and

602
00:32:35.680 --> 00:32:39.559
<v Speaker 1>these are completely authentic things to me. And I'm like, well,

603
00:32:40.000 --> 00:32:41.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, people can take it or leave it, but

604
00:32:42.400 --> 00:32:45.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm not like lying about the stuff I experience. You know,

605
00:32:45.759 --> 00:32:49.119
<v Speaker 1>someone could argue, like a Devil's advocate point that I'm

606
00:32:49.160 --> 00:32:52.799
<v Speaker 1>not perceiving my own experience is accurately enough, which like

607
00:32:52.839 --> 00:32:54.759
<v Speaker 1>fair enough. I don't really have a counterpoint to that.

608
00:32:54.839 --> 00:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, when I look within, I'm like, Okay, well,

609
00:32:57.440 --> 00:33:00.359
<v Speaker 1>what's going on? Like, yeah, I think that there's there's

610
00:33:00.480 --> 00:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>value in intuition and feeling, in understanding your emotions. I

611
00:33:06.039 --> 00:33:08.079
<v Speaker 1>just I think of it broadly as soft skills.

612
00:33:08.359 --> 00:33:12.599
<v Speaker 2>I find it sort of fun to think about when

613
00:33:12.640 --> 00:33:16.319
<v Speaker 2>you and whenever this might have been along the journey,

614
00:33:16.359 --> 00:33:20.000
<v Speaker 2>when you consider yourself successful or established or you know,

615
00:33:20.279 --> 00:33:24.319
<v Speaker 2>now I have the means to live a life where

616
00:33:24.319 --> 00:33:26.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't have to really, you know, grind day to day.

617
00:33:27.079 --> 00:33:32.039
<v Speaker 2>Whatever that moment was, I wonder how much that sort

618
00:33:32.079 --> 00:33:37.319
<v Speaker 2>of freedom had an impact on how you started thinking

619
00:33:37.400 --> 00:33:41.599
<v Speaker 2>after that, and how much perhaps more rigid you were

620
00:33:41.599 --> 00:33:45.599
<v Speaker 2>before that because the focus was more on becoming successful.

621
00:33:47.079 --> 00:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's funny because to an extent, I'm not sure

622
00:33:51.480 --> 00:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that that is a healthy perspective to have, and I'm

623
00:33:54.240 --> 00:33:57.119
<v Speaker 1>not sure it's one that I even really do have,

624
00:33:57.559 --> 00:34:01.079
<v Speaker 1>because I'm always concerned that when I go to play,

625
00:34:01.640 --> 00:34:05.079
<v Speaker 1>I may just play terribly and make all kinds of

626
00:34:05.119 --> 00:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>blunders right, and then look like a fool. And I

627
00:34:08.239 --> 00:34:10.880
<v Speaker 1>think that that's good, Like I like that poker has

628
00:34:10.920 --> 00:34:13.599
<v Speaker 1>that you never have sort of like sailed off into

629
00:34:13.639 --> 00:34:16.079
<v Speaker 1>the sunset and like you turn up works.

630
00:34:16.360 --> 00:34:19.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's from like a spiritual way where the

631
00:34:20.159 --> 00:34:23.360
<v Speaker 2>freedom of having no immediate financial pressure for each next

632
00:34:23.480 --> 00:34:26.840
<v Speaker 2>event or each next game you play, having that freedom

633
00:34:26.920 --> 00:34:28.760
<v Speaker 2>to not be so tied to the day to day

634
00:34:28.800 --> 00:34:31.920
<v Speaker 2>results gave you the room then to become more spiritual

635
00:34:32.000 --> 00:34:34.719
<v Speaker 2>because you had time to open up your mind to

636
00:34:34.800 --> 00:34:36.039
<v Speaker 2>all these things that you're involved with.

637
00:34:36.079 --> 00:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Now, I would say that that's a fair point. But

638
00:34:40.079 --> 00:34:45.119
<v Speaker 1>in a sense, the willingness to not feel thrown about

639
00:34:45.159 --> 00:34:47.280
<v Speaker 1>by the daily results is what actually allows you to

640
00:34:47.320 --> 00:34:49.679
<v Speaker 1>get there. You sort of have to become that person

641
00:34:49.760 --> 00:34:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that's I don't know is sovereign the right term, or

642
00:34:55.239 --> 00:34:58.559
<v Speaker 1>clear about who you are and what matters to you.

643
00:34:59.280 --> 00:35:01.199
<v Speaker 1>Like if you really, I feel like you're doing your best,

644
00:35:01.280 --> 00:35:05.039
<v Speaker 1>then you shouldn't care as much about the results. There's

645
00:35:05.039 --> 00:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>still going to be lessons to be learned in every case.

646
00:35:08.079 --> 00:35:10.679
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think that sort of getting there first

647
00:35:10.920 --> 00:35:14.639
<v Speaker 1>is what allows the physical aspect of things to arrive

648
00:35:14.960 --> 00:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>right or seamlessly at least.

649
00:35:16.920 --> 00:35:21.039
<v Speaker 2>So was there a moment in time in your career

650
00:35:21.920 --> 00:35:25.400
<v Speaker 2>where you felt as though, now I will sort of

651
00:35:25.440 --> 00:35:28.519
<v Speaker 2>stay the course as a poker player because this is

652
00:35:28.880 --> 00:35:30.800
<v Speaker 2>something that I enjoy, this is something that I see

653
00:35:30.800 --> 00:35:34.239
<v Speaker 2>a future in. And on the contrary, have you had

654
00:35:34.280 --> 00:35:37.400
<v Speaker 2>moments where you probably where you thought to yourself, is

655
00:35:37.440 --> 00:35:40.480
<v Speaker 2>this what I want to do? Is this my pathway

656
00:35:40.519 --> 00:35:43.800
<v Speaker 2>to to you know, living in a financially stable life,

657
00:35:43.840 --> 00:35:47.639
<v Speaker 2>because the ups and downs are are never more obvious

658
00:35:47.679 --> 00:35:49.360
<v Speaker 2>than when you talk to a poker player.

659
00:35:49.639 --> 00:35:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure, I think a lot of the very

660
00:35:52.320 --> 00:35:56.320
<v Speaker 1>clear moments of this is something I'm definitely going to do.

661
00:35:56.440 --> 00:35:59.679
<v Speaker 1>Happened early on, and then over time it's been a

662
00:35:59.760 --> 00:36:06.199
<v Speaker 1>rocky road in certain cases, especially as I've pursued avenues

663
00:36:06.199 --> 00:36:09.639
<v Speaker 1>and opportunities outside of poker or adjacent to poker. I

664
00:36:09.679 --> 00:36:12.960
<v Speaker 1>guess like every time I succeed in any capacity, it

665
00:36:13.039 --> 00:36:15.639
<v Speaker 1>gives me confidence to keep going. I mean, it's a

666
00:36:15.719 --> 00:36:18.559
<v Speaker 1>challenging game. It was something I like to say, is

667
00:36:18.599 --> 00:36:22.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, whenever something happens where you know someone would

668
00:36:22.639 --> 00:36:25.360
<v Speaker 1>be mowing their bad luck or complain or whatever, I

669
00:36:25.400 --> 00:36:27.039
<v Speaker 1>just say, it's the life I chose. You know, there's

670
00:36:27.079 --> 00:36:30.440
<v Speaker 1>trade offs to everything, and part of what you're rightly

671
00:36:30.480 --> 00:36:32.880
<v Speaker 1>pointing out about, you know, a luxury of the poker

672
00:36:32.920 --> 00:36:35.239
<v Speaker 1>player lifestyle is that, yeah, I don't have to get

673
00:36:35.320 --> 00:36:37.679
<v Speaker 1>up every day and go to a traditional job, and

674
00:36:37.760 --> 00:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm very grateful for that because it has just never

675
00:36:40.519 --> 00:36:44.679
<v Speaker 1>suited me to live that way. On the other hand, yeah,

676
00:36:44.679 --> 00:36:46.840
<v Speaker 1>those trade offs that you know, you can have a

677
00:36:46.880 --> 00:36:51.960
<v Speaker 1>losing year or deeply question your abilities or feel out

678
00:36:52.000 --> 00:36:54.760
<v Speaker 1>classed or whatever it is that comes with the territory.

679
00:36:56.000 --> 00:36:59.880
<v Speaker 2>What's the longest losing streak you've had or the sort

680
00:36:59.920 --> 00:37:02.679
<v Speaker 2>of the lowest point that you've that you've sort of,

681
00:37:02.800 --> 00:37:05.199
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, ended up in and what did it

682
00:37:05.239 --> 00:37:06.199
<v Speaker 2>take to turn that around?

683
00:37:07.159 --> 00:37:10.079
<v Speaker 1>It's usually about a year and a half is sort

684
00:37:10.079 --> 00:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>of the longest stretch I've had. It's after a few times.

685
00:37:12.079 --> 00:37:13.679
<v Speaker 2>You're saying it like this happened multiple times.

686
00:37:13.880 --> 00:37:17.639
<v Speaker 1>It has, Yeah, it definitely has. And then the second

687
00:37:17.719 --> 00:37:19.119
<v Speaker 1>question was like what got me out of it?

688
00:37:19.239 --> 00:37:21.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like, I mean, the easiest answer is, yeah, I

689
00:37:21.719 --> 00:37:23.280
<v Speaker 2>won two million and then all of a sudden I

690
00:37:23.280 --> 00:37:27.079
<v Speaker 2>was back. But clearly it's probably not as simple as

691
00:37:27.079 --> 00:37:27.519
<v Speaker 2>it looks.

692
00:37:27.960 --> 00:37:31.079
<v Speaker 1>Well. One thing that I feel very strongly about is

693
00:37:31.119 --> 00:37:36.079
<v Speaker 1>that in any prolonged downswing I've had, there was something

694
00:37:36.360 --> 00:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>like I was just not seeing things. Clearly, there was

695
00:37:38.480 --> 00:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a part that I played in it. I was not

696
00:37:40.960 --> 00:37:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a victim. I was just playing bad or wrong about something.

697
00:37:45.039 --> 00:37:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And I feel making whatever mind set shift that was

698
00:37:47.800 --> 00:37:50.679
<v Speaker 1>pertinent at the time really helped unlock that for me.

699
00:37:50.920 --> 00:37:53.519
<v Speaker 2>Was it a real time sort of assessment or was

700
00:37:53.519 --> 00:37:54.679
<v Speaker 2>it a hindsight assessment?

701
00:37:55.119 --> 00:37:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Uh no, No, it was a real time thing where

702
00:37:57.280 --> 00:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I would recognize I'm doing something wrong, I'm thinking about

703
00:38:01.000 --> 00:38:05.880
<v Speaker 1>things incorrectly, and then getting rid of that or shifting

704
00:38:05.920 --> 00:38:08.039
<v Speaker 1>it is probably a better way to say it. Transforming it.

705
00:38:09.400 --> 00:38:12.079
<v Speaker 1>We're just free up emotional bandwidth. It would free up

706
00:38:13.679 --> 00:38:15.800
<v Speaker 1>space in my head that I maybe didn't even know

707
00:38:15.920 --> 00:38:19.599
<v Speaker 1>was there, leading into you know, that prolonged down swing.

708
00:38:20.199 --> 00:38:25.400
<v Speaker 2>But it's fascinating because in the grand scheme of like

709
00:38:25.480 --> 00:38:28.239
<v Speaker 2>poker's lifelong sort of sample size, especially when it comes

710
00:38:28.280 --> 00:38:32.239
<v Speaker 2>to live poker, you know, the people that have played

711
00:38:32.840 --> 00:38:35.800
<v Speaker 2>online sessions or you know, gone to a million hand

712
00:38:35.880 --> 00:38:38.400
<v Speaker 2>downswing or whatever the case may be, they might hear

713
00:38:38.440 --> 00:38:42.079
<v Speaker 2>this and say, like, you haven't even scratched the surface

714
00:38:42.159 --> 00:38:46.320
<v Speaker 2>yet on what a downswing could be, and whatever it

715
00:38:46.360 --> 00:38:49.360
<v Speaker 2>is that turned it around, it is probably much more

716
00:38:49.480 --> 00:38:50.719
<v Speaker 2>variance than it is application.

717
00:38:51.360 --> 00:38:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I'm very familiar with this view and perspective, and

718
00:38:55.000 --> 00:38:57.599
<v Speaker 1>it's one that I held for a long time. If

719
00:38:57.639 --> 00:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm speaking honestly about my experience and someone says well,

720
00:39:00.000 --> 00:39:03.800
<v Speaker 1>well that's because of X, Y and Z, I can't

721
00:39:03.840 --> 00:39:06.719
<v Speaker 1>like overrule it and say, well, I'm sure this is

722
00:39:06.760 --> 00:39:08.840
<v Speaker 1>true because this is my experience, like it can be

723
00:39:08.880 --> 00:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>true for me and someone else can still feel that

724
00:39:11.000 --> 00:39:17.559
<v Speaker 1>it's objectively dubious, right, But stepping aside from that, slightly.

725
00:39:18.440 --> 00:39:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I am skeptical. I'll say that ontological randomness is a thing,

726
00:39:24.079 --> 00:39:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that randomness truly as a concept, is baked into reality.

727
00:39:27.480 --> 00:39:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel that there is there are reasons that things

728
00:39:30.480 --> 00:39:33.840
<v Speaker 1>unfold and happen the way they do, and I'm deeply

729
00:39:33.880 --> 00:39:36.360
<v Speaker 1>intrigued by looking for those reasons. And I feel like,

730
00:39:37.000 --> 00:39:41.400
<v Speaker 1>irrespective of whether I'm right about my skepticism, there taking

731
00:39:41.440 --> 00:39:44.639
<v Speaker 1>ownership over your experiences and looking for ways to improve,

732
00:39:45.159 --> 00:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't see any downside to that. I feel that

733
00:39:47.000 --> 00:39:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that is a net benefit for anyone who walks that path.

734
00:39:52.239 --> 00:39:55.679
<v Speaker 2>When you become aware of being in that sort of

735
00:39:55.719 --> 00:39:59.719
<v Speaker 2>downward spiral, you know, as far as your play goes

736
00:39:59.880 --> 00:40:04.840
<v Speaker 2>or or your mindset, do you have specific things you

737
00:40:04.880 --> 00:40:07.719
<v Speaker 2>then sort of recenter with, like maybe like some you know,

738
00:40:07.880 --> 00:40:13.199
<v Speaker 2>hardcore study hours or additional meditation or long hikes in

739
00:40:13.239 --> 00:40:16.960
<v Speaker 2>the wilderness to perhaps have a reset moment.

740
00:40:17.800 --> 00:40:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I think all those things can be helpful. I think

741
00:40:20.519 --> 00:40:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of those as you know, they're sort of all tools. Right,

742
00:40:23.920 --> 00:40:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes doing more is not always the best answer. Sometimes

743
00:40:26.679 --> 00:40:28.800
<v Speaker 1>doing more is what gets you there in the first place.

744
00:40:29.000 --> 00:40:36.119
<v Speaker 1>You continually are looking for things to placate this uncertainty

745
00:40:36.199 --> 00:40:38.679
<v Speaker 1>about you know, when will things change? Will they change?

746
00:40:39.840 --> 00:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes just accepting it and just being grateful for what

747
00:40:41.960 --> 00:40:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you already have is the way to shift things. So

748
00:40:46.039 --> 00:40:49.400
<v Speaker 1>if it speaks to the individual who's in that case,

749
00:40:49.719 --> 00:40:51.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean sometimes you do have to be also realistic

750
00:40:51.639 --> 00:40:54.519
<v Speaker 1>about the fact, like, hey, maybe I am strategically lacking,

751
00:40:54.880 --> 00:40:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Like if you're consistently blundering in situations where you know

752
00:40:59.760 --> 00:41:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you're heers are not like they understand what these strategies

753
00:41:02.360 --> 00:41:05.320
<v Speaker 1>look like and how to effectively implement them. I mean

754
00:41:05.360 --> 00:41:08.840
<v Speaker 1>clearly that's that's a cause for concern. So, yeah, that

755
00:41:08.840 --> 00:41:11.199
<v Speaker 1>would be one example of where studying would be effective.

756
00:41:12.239 --> 00:41:14.199
<v Speaker 1>If you generally have a good grasp on the game

757
00:41:14.760 --> 00:41:20.239
<v Speaker 1>and there's sort of more subtle aspects at play, then

758
00:41:20.280 --> 00:41:22.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe backing off that and yeah, going on a hike

759
00:41:22.920 --> 00:41:26.559
<v Speaker 1>or doing some mindfulness practices would be a more effective

760
00:41:26.679 --> 00:41:29.360
<v Speaker 1>way to you know, extricate yourself from the downswing.

761
00:41:30.079 --> 00:41:32.599
<v Speaker 2>I know you've coached Landon Tice, who I've talked with

762
00:41:32.679 --> 00:41:35.559
<v Speaker 2>the studio recently, and he mentioned you as like one

763
00:41:35.599 --> 00:41:39.000
<v Speaker 2>of his mentors and how much he he valued that.

764
00:41:39.880 --> 00:41:43.119
<v Speaker 2>But where does someone at your level go for for

765
00:41:43.119 --> 00:41:45.880
<v Speaker 2>for coaching or for help? Is there is there like

766
00:41:45.960 --> 00:41:49.079
<v Speaker 2>another tier of people or do you have one specific

767
00:41:49.119 --> 00:41:53.320
<v Speaker 2>person in your phone that is able to walk you

768
00:41:53.360 --> 00:41:55.800
<v Speaker 2>through situations like is there is there coaching for guys

769
00:41:55.800 --> 00:41:56.920
<v Speaker 2>at your level?

770
00:41:57.159 --> 00:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean I haven't had what you would define as

771
00:42:00.119 --> 00:42:03.440
<v Speaker 1>coaching in that sense in a very long time for

772
00:42:03.519 --> 00:42:07.360
<v Speaker 1>poker like strategy related stuff. But I am very fortunate

773
00:42:07.440 --> 00:42:08.719
<v Speaker 1>that I have a lot of friends that I can

774
00:42:08.719 --> 00:42:11.760
<v Speaker 1>bounce ideas off of, and some people are more skilled

775
00:42:11.760 --> 00:42:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a you know, certain things than others. So like Steven

776
00:42:16.400 --> 00:42:18.559
<v Speaker 1>Chidwick is a close friend and I can, you know,

777
00:42:19.079 --> 00:42:21.719
<v Speaker 1>bounce ideas off of him, although I actually don't really

778
00:42:21.719 --> 00:42:25.719
<v Speaker 1>talk to him as much about strategy because I mean,

779
00:42:25.760 --> 00:42:29.519
<v Speaker 1>at this point you can, for myself or any other

780
00:42:29.559 --> 00:42:32.519
<v Speaker 1>pro you can ask other people about strategy questions, and

781
00:42:32.599 --> 00:42:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that's totally valid. But when you have, you know, the

782
00:42:35.920 --> 00:42:39.440
<v Speaker 1>solver readily available, you can plug it in and then

783
00:42:39.760 --> 00:42:41.920
<v Speaker 1>anything that someone else is going to tell you, unless

784
00:42:41.920 --> 00:42:44.719
<v Speaker 1>you're asking like a specific thing about a specific player,

785
00:42:44.880 --> 00:42:47.039
<v Speaker 1>like how would you maybe proceed in the spot against

786
00:42:47.039 --> 00:42:48.880
<v Speaker 1>this guy based on what you know? What do you

787
00:42:48.880 --> 00:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>think his assumptions might be? That's a little bit more

788
00:42:51.000 --> 00:42:55.679
<v Speaker 1>granular and different. Barring that nuance you can look at

789
00:42:55.679 --> 00:42:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the output and just sort of understand or you know,

790
00:42:58.639 --> 00:43:02.239
<v Speaker 1>no locket or whatver, and just be like, Okay, this

791
00:43:02.440 --> 00:43:05.880
<v Speaker 1>is kind of what is presenting here. How do I

792
00:43:05.920 --> 00:43:10.440
<v Speaker 1>think that might have shifted? But anyway, point being, I'm

793
00:43:10.480 --> 00:43:12.760
<v Speaker 1>just very fortunate and grateful to have a lot of

794
00:43:12.800 --> 00:43:15.400
<v Speaker 1>friends in the space, and if I need help or

795
00:43:15.440 --> 00:43:18.679
<v Speaker 1>want clarity about something, I can just ask them, and

796
00:43:18.800 --> 00:43:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would hope they would feel the same

797
00:43:20.920 --> 00:43:23.159
<v Speaker 1>willingness to do that with me if so desired.

798
00:43:25.719 --> 00:43:29.480
<v Speaker 2>So when you sort of transpose yourself to like this

799
00:43:29.639 --> 00:43:32.880
<v Speaker 2>situation where you were coaching Landon, what was it that

800
00:43:33.679 --> 00:43:35.960
<v Speaker 2>he needed or perhaps other students that you've had, what

801
00:43:36.000 --> 00:43:38.039
<v Speaker 2>do what do students need if you coach them?

802
00:43:38.519 --> 00:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>That would.

803
00:43:41.119 --> 00:43:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Make coaching necessary as opposed to the approach you just

804
00:43:43.880 --> 00:43:46.920
<v Speaker 2>mentioned where you can note lock something, We're going to

805
00:43:47.000 --> 00:43:50.199
<v Speaker 2>run through some solvers and you know, feel satisfied to

806
00:43:50.760 --> 00:43:52.119
<v Speaker 2>start to keep moving forward.

807
00:43:53.119 --> 00:43:55.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean with Landon, it was a bit different

808
00:43:55.199 --> 00:43:58.519
<v Speaker 1>because he was like around the time that I would

809
00:43:58.519 --> 00:44:00.639
<v Speaker 1>have been I guess you could say coaching, although it

810
00:44:00.639 --> 00:44:03.119
<v Speaker 1>was never really like a traditional arrangement. We were friends

811
00:44:03.199 --> 00:44:06.760
<v Speaker 1>already and he was transitioning from cash games to tournaments,

812
00:44:06.800 --> 00:44:09.559
<v Speaker 1>So I was mostly just kind of sharing tournament ideas.

813
00:44:10.039 --> 00:44:13.920
<v Speaker 1>But to your question about like what is coaching offer someone,

814
00:44:14.320 --> 00:44:17.119
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of times it's really just pinpointing

815
00:44:17.159 --> 00:44:20.039
<v Speaker 1>the aspects of their thought process or understanding that they

816
00:44:20.159 --> 00:44:25.440
<v Speaker 1>themselves cannot identify, either through just the experience they have

817
00:44:25.519 --> 00:44:28.360
<v Speaker 1>in the game, or sometimes we don't necessarily want to

818
00:44:28.400 --> 00:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>look at at certain things. And I think ideally one

819
00:44:33.199 --> 00:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>plays poker and kind of a holistic fashion where you

820
00:44:37.000 --> 00:44:41.559
<v Speaker 1>don't really want to ignore anything that's going on when

821
00:44:41.559 --> 00:44:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you're at the table or that you're thinking about, like

822
00:44:43.360 --> 00:44:45.719
<v Speaker 1>it all kind of ties in together. I think this

823
00:44:45.760 --> 00:44:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is probably part of like a broader I guess you

824
00:44:47.960 --> 00:44:50.840
<v Speaker 1>could call it chem set life philosophy. But separation is

825
00:44:50.920 --> 00:44:54.519
<v Speaker 1>kind of just an illusion, you know, we create separation

826
00:44:54.679 --> 00:44:58.519
<v Speaker 1>between things, but there's just like reality is one thing,

827
00:44:58.679 --> 00:45:03.159
<v Speaker 1>like you are your experience, So just figuring out where

828
00:45:03.280 --> 00:45:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you might be miscalibrated or out of alignment or what

829
00:45:06.920 --> 00:45:09.360
<v Speaker 1>have you outside of the table, and then of course

830
00:45:09.400 --> 00:45:13.679
<v Speaker 1>strategically as well. Again I just feel very I guess

831
00:45:13.719 --> 00:45:16.760
<v Speaker 1>gifted in that sense. I strategy just kind of made

832
00:45:16.760 --> 00:45:20.039
<v Speaker 1>sense to me not to be pompous or whatever. But

833
00:45:20.159 --> 00:45:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it just it just it felt like once I got

834
00:45:22.880 --> 00:45:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a grasp on it, I was like, oh yeah, balance, Okay,

835
00:45:27.320 --> 00:45:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, just yeah, a lot of it made sense,

836
00:45:30.519 --> 00:45:33.039
<v Speaker 1>and I I was pleased to see that some of

837
00:45:33.079 --> 00:45:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the early ideas I had were sort of validated by solvers,

838
00:45:37.519 --> 00:45:40.239
<v Speaker 1>and then some were up ended as well, Like some

839
00:45:40.280 --> 00:45:41.599
<v Speaker 1>things I just did not get correct.

840
00:45:41.639 --> 00:45:47.480
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, do you think there's there's traps in people

841
00:45:47.519 --> 00:45:51.280
<v Speaker 3>studying and using solvers and perhaps not using them the

842
00:45:51.360 --> 00:45:54.000
<v Speaker 3>right way and leading them down like the wrong path,

843
00:45:54.199 --> 00:45:56.760
<v Speaker 3>or perhaps down a path where they might not improve

844
00:45:56.760 --> 00:45:58.360
<v Speaker 3>as much because they focus on the wrong things.

845
00:45:59.000 --> 00:46:01.039
<v Speaker 1>Definitely, And I think that's one of the traps I

846
00:46:01.119 --> 00:46:06.239
<v Speaker 1>fell into, was just feeling as if these outputs are

847
00:46:06.280 --> 00:46:12.039
<v Speaker 1>like gospel. I mean, that's not a helpful approach because well,

848
00:46:12.119 --> 00:46:15.039
<v Speaker 1>just ignores the reality of how they were created and

849
00:46:15.119 --> 00:46:18.039
<v Speaker 1>how they can shift. So I think if one is

850
00:46:18.039 --> 00:46:21.960
<v Speaker 1>too rigid, that's a problem because eventually you're going to

851
00:46:22.039 --> 00:46:24.960
<v Speaker 1>encounter a spot where you almost feel like this sort

852
00:46:24.960 --> 00:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of egoic sense of entitlement, Hey I should have won

853
00:46:27.960 --> 00:46:30.159
<v Speaker 1>this or you should have folded that hand, and it's

854
00:46:30.199 --> 00:46:33.280
<v Speaker 1>just like hey, bro, like that's reality. And you went

855
00:46:33.360 --> 00:46:36.000
<v Speaker 1>up against it and you didn't you couldn't accept it,

856
00:46:36.039 --> 00:46:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, you got crushed. So I think

857
00:46:38.920 --> 00:46:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that's one thing that can cause issues. Other than that,

858
00:46:43.960 --> 00:46:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, you know, it's an interesting question, like

859
00:46:46.440 --> 00:46:48.199
<v Speaker 1>take someone like Jesse, who I think's been kind of

860
00:46:48.239 --> 00:46:50.800
<v Speaker 1>open about the fact that he doesn't use or value solvers.

861
00:46:51.239 --> 00:46:54.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, would him taking the time to do something

862
00:46:54.480 --> 00:46:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that he's not interested in help him. I'm inclined to

863
00:46:57.320 --> 00:47:02.039
<v Speaker 1>think no, even if the data or knowledge is valuable.

864
00:47:02.039 --> 00:47:04.119
<v Speaker 1>I just think there's many different ways to do things.

865
00:47:04.599 --> 00:47:07.119
<v Speaker 1>And I kind of go back to my time playing online.

866
00:47:07.559 --> 00:47:09.599
<v Speaker 1>I had used a hot at times, like I heads

867
00:47:09.599 --> 00:47:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a display that shows you player stats and whatnot, and

868
00:47:13.639 --> 00:47:16.039
<v Speaker 1>basically all of my peers were using it, and there

869
00:47:16.039 --> 00:47:17.440
<v Speaker 1>was a time where I just felt like it was

870
00:47:18.639 --> 00:47:20.599
<v Speaker 1>too much visual noise and it was taking me out

871
00:47:20.599 --> 00:47:24.039
<v Speaker 1>of the moment. And maybe that's like kind of a

872
00:47:24.039 --> 00:47:27.440
<v Speaker 1>comparable example where you know, sometimes less is more.

873
00:47:29.039 --> 00:47:31.719
<v Speaker 2>Correct me if I'm wrong on this, But when I

874
00:47:31.719 --> 00:47:36.920
<v Speaker 2>listen to podcasts with successful individuals, whether it's sports or poker,

875
00:47:38.400 --> 00:47:43.920
<v Speaker 2>oftentimes when people describe their experiences, there's a certain element

876
00:47:44.000 --> 00:47:49.400
<v Speaker 2>missing where they are privileged by the fact that they

877
00:47:49.400 --> 00:47:52.880
<v Speaker 2>were born with a certain talent, you know, running fast, swimming, tennis,

878
00:47:53.320 --> 00:47:57.119
<v Speaker 2>or in your case, having the mind to apply yourself

879
00:47:57.559 --> 00:48:01.119
<v Speaker 2>well in strategy games and in poker. How big of

880
00:48:01.159 --> 00:48:05.320
<v Speaker 2>a factor is is sort of what you were born

881
00:48:05.400 --> 00:48:08.480
<v Speaker 2>with in the in the in the context of your success.

882
00:48:11.159 --> 00:48:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh wow, tough to say. So my father was an engineer.

883
00:48:15.400 --> 00:48:19.079
<v Speaker 1>I actually just recently learned that. My mom told me

884
00:48:19.119 --> 00:48:21.960
<v Speaker 1>she went to college for three year studying psychology and

885
00:48:22.000 --> 00:48:23.880
<v Speaker 1>thought she would have done better in that field than

886
00:48:24.679 --> 00:48:26.960
<v Speaker 1>where she ended up in nursing, because it's a more

887
00:48:27.000 --> 00:48:29.559
<v Speaker 1>like mental thing. And I was like, oh, wow, that's

888
00:48:29.639 --> 00:48:32.360
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. It's like, do you understand that that's a

889
00:48:32.360 --> 00:48:34.840
<v Speaker 1>bit ironic because I pursued a mental activity and I've

890
00:48:34.840 --> 00:48:37.960
<v Speaker 1>done pretty well at it, which you know, she didn't

891
00:48:37.960 --> 00:48:39.960
<v Speaker 1>really catch that either until I brought it up. But

892
00:48:41.039 --> 00:48:43.639
<v Speaker 1>it is likely at the very least that, you know,

893
00:48:43.679 --> 00:48:48.440
<v Speaker 1>those traits that my parents had were sort of disseminated

894
00:48:48.440 --> 00:48:53.960
<v Speaker 1>by osmosis. But there are certain things, and I mean,

895
00:48:54.119 --> 00:48:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it depends how do you want to

896
00:48:55.480 --> 00:48:57.519
<v Speaker 1>go with this, Like is it retrocousal? Like I was

897
00:48:57.519 --> 00:48:59.199
<v Speaker 1>always sort of meant to be a poker player, and

898
00:48:59.199 --> 00:49:02.079
<v Speaker 1>I was drawn to these activities by virtue of that.

899
00:49:02.280 --> 00:49:06.320
<v Speaker 1>But it was extremely interested in all kinds of games

900
00:49:06.400 --> 00:49:10.239
<v Speaker 1>and memory in particular as a kid. And obviously that's

901
00:49:10.239 --> 00:49:13.639
<v Speaker 1>helpful in poker, not just because it, you know, helps

902
00:49:14.079 --> 00:49:17.360
<v Speaker 1>recall strategies, but you know, hand histries, you played against people,

903
00:49:17.480 --> 00:49:22.159
<v Speaker 1>and all kinds of stuff. So there are definitely things

904
00:49:22.199 --> 00:49:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that I do think I was sort of I guess

905
00:49:23.800 --> 00:49:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you could say, genetically predisposed or environmentally predisposed to that

906
00:49:27.880 --> 00:49:31.360
<v Speaker 1>helped with poker. And there are certain things where I

907
00:49:31.400 --> 00:49:35.079
<v Speaker 1>did sort of have to like get up and get

908
00:49:35.079 --> 00:49:37.599
<v Speaker 1>after it in a sense that also helped.

909
00:49:38.000 --> 00:49:44.119
<v Speaker 2>So you when you like are first learning about solvers,

910
00:49:44.159 --> 00:49:47.519
<v Speaker 2>when the solver era sort of started and you got

911
00:49:47.519 --> 00:49:49.199
<v Speaker 2>access to to use one.

912
00:49:49.880 --> 00:49:51.960
<v Speaker 1>What did that look like? Was it exploratory?

913
00:49:52.199 --> 00:49:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Was it someone who you know got into that before

914
00:49:54.880 --> 00:49:57.239
<v Speaker 2>you teaching you how to use them? And did that

915
00:49:57.280 --> 00:49:59.760
<v Speaker 2>then lead to sort of the way I see it,

916
00:49:59.800 --> 00:50:01.719
<v Speaker 2>maybe back in the day when you guys used to

917
00:50:01.719 --> 00:50:04.920
<v Speaker 2>play online was like NonStop, round the clock multi tabling

918
00:50:05.000 --> 00:50:08.159
<v Speaker 2>stuff like that. Was it sort of that? But then

919
00:50:08.480 --> 00:50:11.880
<v Speaker 2>in the solver world give some insights into when that

920
00:50:11.920 --> 00:50:13.360
<v Speaker 2>era sort of started coming along.

921
00:50:15.239 --> 00:50:17.960
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of funny. So yeah, I did have friends

922
00:50:17.960 --> 00:50:20.000
<v Speaker 1>who got into them before me, and they were pretty

923
00:50:20.000 --> 00:50:22.559
<v Speaker 1>pumped about it, and I was intrigued. I remember the

924
00:50:22.599 --> 00:50:26.079
<v Speaker 1>first solver that I became familiar with was Poker Snowy.

925
00:50:27.280 --> 00:50:30.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it was a CFR based kind of

926
00:50:30.159 --> 00:50:33.320
<v Speaker 1>factual regret minimization program. It was it was some sort

927
00:50:33.320 --> 00:50:36.679
<v Speaker 1>of algorithm that created solutions in its own way. Maybe

928
00:50:36.679 --> 00:50:39.119
<v Speaker 1>it was a version of CFR, but I thought it

929
00:50:39.159 --> 00:50:42.360
<v Speaker 1>was interesting how it suggested playing preflop with different hands.

930
00:50:42.880 --> 00:50:46.199
<v Speaker 1>And then soon after that, like more like the solvers

931
00:50:46.239 --> 00:50:48.079
<v Speaker 1>that are kind of still around to this day, were

932
00:50:48.119 --> 00:50:52.400
<v Speaker 1>commonly used by you know, various pros came around, and

933
00:50:52.440 --> 00:50:54.159
<v Speaker 1>at that point I was on a pretty big upswing

934
00:50:54.400 --> 00:50:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and was being stubborn and I just wasn't really that interested.

935
00:51:00.639 --> 00:51:03.199
<v Speaker 1>It also didn't help that one of my friends should

936
00:51:03.239 --> 00:51:05.599
<v Speaker 1>be an early version where there was clearly some bug

937
00:51:06.159 --> 00:51:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and the solow was just saying to fold the nut straight.

938
00:51:08.880 --> 00:51:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I was just like, yeah, I don't need this, like

939
00:51:10.440 --> 00:51:13.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing well right now. So that would have been

940
00:51:13.639 --> 00:51:17.800
<v Speaker 1>like around twenty sixteen, and I sort of prolonged my

941
00:51:18.000 --> 00:51:20.719
<v Speaker 1>exposure to them. I also had a lot of other

942
00:51:20.840 --> 00:51:23.320
<v Speaker 1>life stuff going on around this time. It was unclear

943
00:51:23.360 --> 00:51:25.119
<v Speaker 1>to me if I was going to stick with poker.

944
00:51:25.519 --> 00:51:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I got on a very big down swing, and yeah,

945
00:51:29.000 --> 00:51:31.159
<v Speaker 1>I was just sort of going through some growing pains

946
00:51:31.199 --> 00:51:35.719
<v Speaker 1>in my life generally speaking. And then around twenty nineteen

947
00:51:36.400 --> 00:51:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I was like, Okay, I should pursue this. This is valuable,

948
00:51:40.199 --> 00:51:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and I did. And then when COVID hit, I really

949
00:51:43.519 --> 00:51:46.159
<v Speaker 1>got deeper into it. And that was one of the

950
00:51:46.159 --> 00:51:48.960
<v Speaker 1>ways that Land and I bonded because he was using

951
00:51:49.000 --> 00:51:51.039
<v Speaker 1>these tools a lot as sort of part of the

952
00:51:51.039 --> 00:51:52.920
<v Speaker 1>younger generation that grew up with them or grew up

953
00:51:52.960 --> 00:51:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in poker with them, you know, sort of eventually came

954
00:51:55.920 --> 00:51:57.239
<v Speaker 1>to value them, and then I went too far the

955
00:51:57.280 --> 00:51:59.239
<v Speaker 1>other way. And then, you know, I speak from experience

956
00:51:59.239 --> 00:52:01.920
<v Speaker 1>when I say feeling that you know these are our

957
00:52:01.920 --> 00:52:07.320
<v Speaker 1>gospel type truths or the downsides of that rigidity. Those

958
00:52:07.320 --> 00:52:10.239
<v Speaker 1>are all firsthand experiences that I lived and had to

959
00:52:10.280 --> 00:52:13.679
<v Speaker 1>come to terms with, because when you don't know that

960
00:52:13.719 --> 00:52:15.719
<v Speaker 1>they exist, and you come from an era like I did,

961
00:52:15.760 --> 00:52:18.639
<v Speaker 1>where you can ruminate about a hand for a while

962
00:52:19.039 --> 00:52:22.199
<v Speaker 1>and often come to the sort of crux of the decision,

963
00:52:22.239 --> 00:52:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well, if he would have done this with

964
00:52:24.000 --> 00:52:26.480
<v Speaker 1>as eight, then it's probably you know, a good play,

965
00:52:26.480 --> 00:52:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and if not, then it's a bad play. And the

966
00:52:28.320 --> 00:52:31.280
<v Speaker 1>solvers just give you that right away. So the incredible

967
00:52:31.280 --> 00:52:36.159
<v Speaker 1>power that they contained within that ability to process data

968
00:52:36.239 --> 00:52:39.639
<v Speaker 1>and output solutions, I was like, Wow, this is really cool,

969
00:52:40.119 --> 00:52:44.599
<v Speaker 1>and that really got me excited about exploring them very deeply.

970
00:52:45.079 --> 00:52:46.679
<v Speaker 1>And then yeah, I just went too far with it,

971
00:52:46.719 --> 00:52:48.960
<v Speaker 1>which I've probably done with many things in my life.

972
00:52:49.360 --> 00:52:52.159
<v Speaker 1>And then I you know, found a middle ground and

973
00:52:52.199 --> 00:52:54.719
<v Speaker 1>now I feel that, you know, like with most things,

974
00:52:54.760 --> 00:52:56.559
<v Speaker 1>just finding a balance is healthy.

975
00:52:57.880 --> 00:53:02.960
<v Speaker 2>For televised poker, we're in a very weird situation where

976
00:53:04.320 --> 00:53:07.679
<v Speaker 2>if it's the cash game, it's organized by a person

977
00:53:07.920 --> 00:53:10.559
<v Speaker 2>and he brings his friends if the stakes are high enough,

978
00:53:11.079 --> 00:53:14.960
<v Speaker 2>and that type of entertainment will get tens of thousands

979
00:53:15.000 --> 00:53:19.119
<v Speaker 2>of people watching in real time, myself included, because of

980
00:53:19.119 --> 00:53:22.880
<v Speaker 2>the unpredictable nature of the characters and the amount of

981
00:53:22.920 --> 00:53:25.320
<v Speaker 2>money that's on the table and you know, all the

982
00:53:25.400 --> 00:53:29.159
<v Speaker 2>little sort of side randomness and factors and drinking and

983
00:53:29.199 --> 00:53:33.239
<v Speaker 2>whatnot that's happening at the table. And then the contrast

984
00:53:33.280 --> 00:53:35.719
<v Speaker 2>to that would be the you know, as some of

985
00:53:35.800 --> 00:53:38.639
<v Speaker 2>people have called it the math contest, you know PGD

986
00:53:38.760 --> 00:53:42.239
<v Speaker 2>event final tables where on day one, and we've shown

987
00:53:42.239 --> 00:53:44.559
<v Speaker 2>this on stream also on day one, it is casual,

988
00:53:44.639 --> 00:53:47.360
<v Speaker 2>it is laid back, people are joking, having fun, and

989
00:53:47.400 --> 00:53:52.079
<v Speaker 2>then when the final table starts, it's quiet and obviously

990
00:53:52.679 --> 00:53:55.719
<v Speaker 2>there's lots of thinking happening, but it is not outwardly.

991
00:53:56.039 --> 00:54:01.280
<v Speaker 2>It is inwardly and it becomes very mechanical. Is this

992
00:54:01.519 --> 00:54:05.559
<v Speaker 2>just how poker is now? Where the cash games give

993
00:54:05.639 --> 00:54:08.599
<v Speaker 2>us a chance to watch peel back to curtain on

994
00:54:08.960 --> 00:54:11.360
<v Speaker 2>what that sort of high stakes world is like. And

995
00:54:11.400 --> 00:54:15.159
<v Speaker 2>then on the contrary, we have the tournament universe, where

996
00:54:15.800 --> 00:54:20.480
<v Speaker 2>the focus is much more so on the who's best

997
00:54:20.480 --> 00:54:23.840
<v Speaker 2>prepared for the situation. And then of course the amount

998
00:54:23.840 --> 00:54:26.119
<v Speaker 2>of money at stake varies from event to events. But

999
00:54:27.039 --> 00:54:29.000
<v Speaker 2>that contrast could not be any bigger.

1000
00:54:28.760 --> 00:54:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Right now now, I completely agree. I'm glad you brought

1001
00:54:31.360 --> 00:54:35.079
<v Speaker 1>it up, because I've actually thought about this a lot.

1002
00:54:35.400 --> 00:54:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the main thing that's going on there is

1003
00:54:38.400 --> 00:54:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in cash games, in order to get a seat and

1004
00:54:41.440 --> 00:54:44.320
<v Speaker 1>be in that juicy game, you have to be entertaining,

1005
00:54:44.880 --> 00:54:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and in poker tournaments there's really no incentive to be entertaining,

1006
00:54:48.840 --> 00:54:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you're probably going to decrease your win rate. If anything.

1007
00:54:51.880 --> 00:54:54.039
<v Speaker 1>I do like to try. I mean not when I'm

1008
00:54:54.079 --> 00:54:56.440
<v Speaker 1>like in hands, I'm quite stoic and focused on the

1009
00:54:56.480 --> 00:54:59.039
<v Speaker 1>task at hand, But in general I like to be

1010
00:54:59.199 --> 00:55:01.239
<v Speaker 1>social and and just have a good time at the table,

1011
00:55:01.280 --> 00:55:05.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, So maybe that's entertaining. It's probably not to

1012
00:55:05.719 --> 00:55:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the same extent, especially when juxtaposed with the fact that

1013
00:55:09.119 --> 00:55:11.480
<v Speaker 1>during hands I am more focused then players would be

1014
00:55:11.480 --> 00:55:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in a cash game. It's just a more competitive environment.

1015
00:55:14.519 --> 00:55:17.599
<v Speaker 1>And if that were to shift in some way, if

1016
00:55:18.599 --> 00:55:22.800
<v Speaker 1>poker were to, you know, have more exposure or have

1017
00:55:23.519 --> 00:55:26.480
<v Speaker 1>higher end sponsors or what have you, you know, I

1018
00:55:26.480 --> 00:55:30.519
<v Speaker 1>would be first in line to be happy to Like basically,

1019
00:55:30.519 --> 00:55:33.159
<v Speaker 1>if the fans were to vote for who they really

1020
00:55:33.199 --> 00:55:35.880
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see, then you'd have a lot more incentive

1021
00:55:36.000 --> 00:55:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and there was benefit to being there outside of just

1022
00:55:39.599 --> 00:55:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, playing the tournament. Is this making sense kind

1023
00:55:42.360 --> 00:55:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about it?

1024
00:55:43.480 --> 00:55:44.960
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of It's kind of like the chicken or

1025
00:55:44.960 --> 00:55:48.480
<v Speaker 2>the egg, right, because you have to make it entertaining

1026
00:55:48.519 --> 00:55:50.039
<v Speaker 2>first before sponsors are interested.

1027
00:55:50.920 --> 00:55:57.400
<v Speaker 1>That's fair. I don't know how much me shifting the

1028
00:55:57.440 --> 00:55:58.880
<v Speaker 1>way I may it would have to be like a

1029
00:55:58.920 --> 00:56:02.079
<v Speaker 1>collective effort of course. Yeah, yeah, I think.

1030
00:56:02.320 --> 00:56:03.760
<v Speaker 2>And and by the way, I'm not saying that you

1031
00:56:03.800 --> 00:56:05.719
<v Speaker 2>guys should do this, Oh no, I totally understand. I'm

1032
00:56:05.760 --> 00:56:08.119
<v Speaker 2>just saying that, like as a pivot point, cash games

1033
00:56:08.320 --> 00:56:11.400
<v Speaker 2>do provide those opportunities because the environment is so different.

1034
00:56:12.280 --> 00:56:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it absolutely is. I think that there's ways to

1035
00:56:15.480 --> 00:56:18.800
<v Speaker 1>structure tournaments that if you were to set it up

1036
00:56:18.880 --> 00:56:23.599
<v Speaker 1>solely as a product to be entertaining, you could handpick

1037
00:56:23.599 --> 00:56:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the field. I mean basically like a TV show. And

1038
00:56:25.840 --> 00:56:28.679
<v Speaker 1>I think if you go back to the poker boom,

1039
00:56:28.800 --> 00:56:31.519
<v Speaker 1>those tournaments were immensely entertaining. And I think, you know,

1040
00:56:32.280 --> 00:56:34.719
<v Speaker 1>probably for most people that came up in that era,

1041
00:56:35.039 --> 00:56:37.039
<v Speaker 1>if you ask them what the most entertaining poker content

1042
00:56:37.119 --> 00:56:40.239
<v Speaker 1>they've ever seen, they're gonna say WSOP in the early

1043
00:56:40.280 --> 00:56:42.880
<v Speaker 1>two thousands, high sakes poker, all the stuff that came

1044
00:56:42.880 --> 00:56:44.960
<v Speaker 1>out around that time, well, high stakes poker was a

1045
00:56:44.960 --> 00:56:47.679
<v Speaker 1>cash game. But point being, I don't think tournaments are

1046
00:56:47.719 --> 00:56:52.639
<v Speaker 1>inherently uninteresting. I just think that they the culture has

1047
00:56:52.719 --> 00:56:58.199
<v Speaker 1>evolved to favor the more competitive archetype, and cash games

1048
00:56:58.199 --> 00:57:02.800
<v Speaker 1>have not evolved in that way. Is almost a contrary exactly.

1049
00:57:02.960 --> 00:57:05.480
<v Speaker 2>It's almost like if you become good at cash games,

1050
00:57:05.639 --> 00:57:06.880
<v Speaker 2>you don't have any games to play.

1051
00:57:07.679 --> 00:57:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's not entirely true, because there are definitely some

1052
00:57:11.239 --> 00:57:15.639
<v Speaker 1>players in any lineup that you could find where you know,

1053
00:57:15.639 --> 00:57:18.800
<v Speaker 1>they're very talented players. They just happen to have sort

1054
00:57:18.840 --> 00:57:22.079
<v Speaker 1>of you know, met the needs essentially of the players

1055
00:57:22.119 --> 00:57:26.119
<v Speaker 1>that are happy to play those games. And yeah, I

1056
00:57:26.159 --> 00:57:27.519
<v Speaker 1>mean again, it's just a trade off, you know. It's

1057
00:57:27.519 --> 00:57:31.000
<v Speaker 1>just a different way to approach being a professional. Nothing

1058
00:57:31.079 --> 00:57:32.800
<v Speaker 1>right or wrong about it, it's just different.

1059
00:57:34.519 --> 00:57:38.559
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel as though the high stake tournament community

1060
00:57:38.880 --> 00:57:44.960
<v Speaker 2>has a responsibility towards non professionals to create an environment

1061
00:57:45.119 --> 00:57:48.000
<v Speaker 2>that is inviting for them to come and play.

1062
00:57:48.159 --> 00:57:51.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, to an extent, definitely. Some people might say no

1063
00:57:51.360 --> 00:57:53.280
<v Speaker 1>because they're like, well, they can just not play. But

1064
00:57:53.599 --> 00:57:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I think got short sighted and I think it kind

1065
00:57:55.400 --> 00:57:57.719
<v Speaker 1>of misses the mark. I mean, at the end of

1066
00:57:57.760 --> 00:58:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the day, if enough people stop playing tournaments, tournaments will die.

1067
00:58:03.039 --> 00:58:07.199
<v Speaker 1>And there's just every reason to be welcoming and inviting

1068
00:58:07.280 --> 00:58:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to all players, but especially the ones that are just

1069
00:58:09.519 --> 00:58:11.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of there to have a good time. I mean,

1070
00:58:11.119 --> 00:58:13.039
<v Speaker 1>if you're a pro, you clearly want that player in

1071
00:58:13.039 --> 00:58:17.719
<v Speaker 1>the field. So I don't like the I'm not sure

1072
00:58:17.760 --> 00:58:20.519
<v Speaker 1>even to what extent this is reality versus just sort

1073
00:58:20.519 --> 00:58:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of image. Imagine it's in my mind and fabricated. But

1074
00:58:25.639 --> 00:58:28.159
<v Speaker 1>like I used to play a lot of cash games

1075
00:58:28.199 --> 00:58:30.679
<v Speaker 1>in Vegas. When the game's got more privatized, I just

1076
00:58:30.679 --> 00:58:32.599
<v Speaker 1>didn't really want to deal with the schmoozing and the

1077
00:58:32.639 --> 00:58:35.679
<v Speaker 1>politics and whatever. I think it's fair to not want

1078
00:58:35.719 --> 00:58:39.079
<v Speaker 1>to do that, but to just be like a reasonable person,

1079
00:58:39.159 --> 00:58:42.320
<v Speaker 1>just be nice to people that turn up to play cards. Well,

1080
00:58:42.440 --> 00:58:45.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean sure, I think that's there's every reason to

1081
00:58:45.280 --> 00:58:46.599
<v Speaker 1>do that. Does that make sense?

1082
00:58:46.679 --> 00:58:50.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? No. And I also think that we can't understate,

1083
00:58:50.800 --> 00:58:53.760
<v Speaker 2>for those who've never been to the Pogogo studio how

1084
00:58:54.199 --> 00:58:57.760
<v Speaker 2>laid back, in casual that atmosphere actually is. That's true, yeah,

1085
00:58:57.920 --> 00:59:01.639
<v Speaker 2>which which is like, again, as we talk about contrast,

1086
00:59:01.960 --> 00:59:06.719
<v Speaker 2>a big contrast with the politicking of high stakes cash.

1087
00:59:06.119 --> 00:59:07.679
<v Speaker 1>And also a big contrast with the way that the

1088
00:59:07.679 --> 00:59:10.360
<v Speaker 1>final tables look when it's like, okay, well you've played

1089
00:59:10.440 --> 00:59:13.360
<v Speaker 1>now for twelve hours on day one or whatever, and

1090
00:59:13.400 --> 00:59:16.360
<v Speaker 1>then you're at the final table vying for you know,

1091
00:59:16.800 --> 00:59:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the real money. So this is a very jovial atmosphere

1092
00:59:19.920 --> 00:59:21.800
<v Speaker 1>on the first day, in the first I would say,

1093
00:59:21.800 --> 00:59:23.239
<v Speaker 1>the first half of the first day, and it gets

1094
00:59:23.239 --> 00:59:26.400
<v Speaker 1>progressively more serious, but it's really always just fun. And

1095
00:59:26.440 --> 00:59:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the reasons I love the new stream format,

1096
00:59:30.840 --> 00:59:34.159
<v Speaker 1>the reality TV style format. Yeah, I think it's fantastic.

1097
00:59:34.280 --> 00:59:36.639
<v Speaker 2>Shout out to Donnie for that and Antonio for making

1098
00:59:36.639 --> 00:59:36.960
<v Speaker 2>it happen.

1099
00:59:37.000 --> 00:59:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Any love that.

1100
00:59:40.159 --> 00:59:43.960
<v Speaker 2>It's been a fun insight and it attracts the hardcore

1101
00:59:44.000 --> 00:59:45.840
<v Speaker 2>fans who just want to see a little more. And

1102
00:59:45.880 --> 00:59:48.639
<v Speaker 2>it has that reality TV element to it, which was yeah, funny.

1103
00:59:48.679 --> 00:59:50.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not polished at all, and I get that that's

1104
00:59:50.920 --> 00:59:53.199
<v Speaker 1>not going to create the next poker boom, but I

1105
00:59:53.239 --> 00:59:57.039
<v Speaker 1>do feel that something that kind of like gets under

1106
00:59:57.079 --> 01:00:00.239
<v Speaker 1>the hood a little bit more like Again, I just

1107
01:00:00.239 --> 01:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>look back at those early WSOP episodes and effectively was

1108
01:00:04.880 --> 01:00:07.199
<v Speaker 1>a reality TV show and it created a pop culture phenomena.

1109
01:00:07.360 --> 01:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Right now, there was other things going on, the boom

1110
01:00:09.519 --> 01:00:14.079
<v Speaker 1>of online poker, moneymaker himself being such an enigma and winning. Yeah,

1111
01:00:14.119 --> 01:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>there was other factors, but I do think that style

1112
01:00:17.039 --> 01:00:22.199
<v Speaker 1>of content, the way it was packaged and created, it

1113
01:00:22.239 --> 01:00:23.639
<v Speaker 1>also helped. With the guy that put it together had

1114
01:00:23.719 --> 01:00:27.519
<v Speaker 1>nine Emmys so you know that's not gonna hurt, but yeah,

1115
01:00:27.519 --> 01:00:31.079
<v Speaker 1>there's just a lot going on there that's, you know,

1116
01:00:31.239 --> 01:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>just very different than what we have now.

1117
01:00:34.239 --> 01:00:37.159
<v Speaker 2>Your poker world, from your perspective that you sort of

1118
01:00:37.199 --> 01:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>operate within, do you feel as though that has gotten smaller?

1119
01:00:41.039 --> 01:00:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Like you play at the studio, you have your group

1120
01:00:42.880 --> 01:00:45.559
<v Speaker 2>of friends you talk to. Do you still venture out,

1121
01:00:45.639 --> 01:00:48.159
<v Speaker 2>do you still like meet new people, go to new places?

1122
01:00:48.559 --> 01:00:50.400
<v Speaker 2>And how important do you think that is or could

1123
01:00:50.480 --> 01:00:52.800
<v Speaker 2>be in order for you to have a good understanding

1124
01:00:52.840 --> 01:00:55.280
<v Speaker 2>of where the poker world as a whole is currently

1125
01:00:55.320 --> 01:00:55.760
<v Speaker 2>sitting at.

1126
01:00:56.480 --> 01:00:59.119
<v Speaker 1>It's a good question I would like to think. I mean,

1127
01:00:59.199 --> 01:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, again, always want to think they have clarity

1128
01:01:01.880 --> 01:01:03.519
<v Speaker 1>about things, but I would like to think I have

1129
01:01:03.519 --> 01:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>a pretty decent understanding of the way that poker is

1130
01:01:05.679 --> 01:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>seen in the wider world. I am pretty social in

1131
01:01:09.440 --> 01:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>my life generally, and I like talking to people about things.

1132
01:01:14.320 --> 01:01:16.639
<v Speaker 1>When I run into people who are familiar with poker,

1133
01:01:17.280 --> 01:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it is very common that they either know it from

1134
01:01:19.880 --> 01:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the boom or they follow someone on Instagram that is

1135
01:01:24.880 --> 01:01:28.119
<v Speaker 1>like a larger name. Occasionally it'll be like, you know,

1136
01:01:28.159 --> 01:01:32.639
<v Speaker 1>like they've seen Wolfgang Shorts on YouTube or yeah, just

1137
01:01:32.639 --> 01:01:36.159
<v Speaker 1>a few people on Instagram that you know, just have

1138
01:01:36.760 --> 01:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>larger audiences that you know, may never step foot in

1139
01:01:40.199 --> 01:01:41.199
<v Speaker 1>a tournament environment.

1140
01:01:41.360 --> 01:01:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Do you have a good sense of where poker is

1141
01:01:43.559 --> 01:01:46.000
<v Speaker 2>right now? Because people love to love to throw these

1142
01:01:46.119 --> 01:01:47.960
<v Speaker 2>things at are like, oh this is good for poker,

1143
01:01:48.079 --> 01:01:50.760
<v Speaker 2>or oh this if this thing happens, well that's going

1144
01:01:50.840 --> 01:01:54.079
<v Speaker 2>to be a game changer. But instead, I think we

1145
01:01:54.159 --> 01:01:58.000
<v Speaker 2>often forget to take a step back and appreciate how

1146
01:01:58.840 --> 01:02:03.000
<v Speaker 2>poker is sort of intertwined and across all starsian media platforms,

1147
01:02:03.440 --> 01:02:05.800
<v Speaker 2>and if people get exposed to it much more than

1148
01:02:05.800 --> 01:02:09.360
<v Speaker 2>they've ever been, there's surely a level of saturation when

1149
01:02:09.360 --> 01:02:12.239
<v Speaker 2>it comes to the amount of content that's available, which

1150
01:02:12.280 --> 01:02:16.559
<v Speaker 2>perhaps fragments attention a little bit. But ultimately for you

1151
01:02:16.559 --> 01:02:19.079
<v Speaker 2>as a player, I wonder how you perceive that.

1152
01:02:20.599 --> 01:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that poker obviously it's gone through a lot.

1153
01:02:25.599 --> 01:02:27.559
<v Speaker 1>I still feel to some extent that we're living in

1154
01:02:27.599 --> 01:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the shadows of Black Friday. I don't think we've fully

1155
01:02:30.039 --> 01:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>recovered from that. And that's just because the boom was

1156
01:02:33.320 --> 01:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>such a prolific era where we just don't have that

1157
01:02:36.000 --> 01:02:39.159
<v Speaker 1>same kind of atmosphere, not in like a you know, hey,

1158
01:02:39.159 --> 01:02:41.159
<v Speaker 1>you're at this table having a good time atmosphere, I mean,

1159
01:02:41.159 --> 01:02:43.119
<v Speaker 1>like a sort of meta atmosphere for the way the

1160
01:02:43.159 --> 01:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>game is. I would love to see poker be at

1161
01:02:45.920 --> 01:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the level of golfer tennis. I don't see why it

1162
01:02:48.480 --> 01:02:51.079
<v Speaker 1>can't be. To be honest with you, I have some

1163
01:02:51.199 --> 01:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>ideas of what necessary shifts would be. In some sense,

1164
01:02:55.920 --> 01:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>it would be the style of content that Donnie is

1165
01:02:58.119 --> 01:03:01.079
<v Speaker 1>pioneering there. But yeah, I don't I clearly don't have

1166
01:03:01.119 --> 01:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>all the answers.

1167
01:03:02.199 --> 01:03:04.559
<v Speaker 2>Well, what do you what do you if you mentioned

1168
01:03:04.559 --> 01:03:07.119
<v Speaker 2>the golf, for example, or other sports, what do you

1169
01:03:07.199 --> 01:03:11.239
<v Speaker 2>miss in poker that those sports have? Well?

1170
01:03:11.239 --> 01:03:13.639
<v Speaker 1>I do think luxury sponsors is one, like if you

1171
01:03:13.760 --> 01:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>cater to and poker already does cater to higher net

1172
01:03:16.880 --> 01:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>worth individuals, So to me, it's kind of a mismatch, Like,

1173
01:03:19.480 --> 01:03:22.559
<v Speaker 1>why is that not happening? Well, it's because there's not

1174
01:03:22.840 --> 01:03:26.519
<v Speaker 1>enough viewers to justify the sponsors giving money to the hosts, right.

1175
01:03:26.599 --> 01:03:30.559
<v Speaker 1>The platform is hosting content, So yeah, I mean there's

1176
01:03:30.679 --> 01:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>there's certainly reasons for that. What they are exactly, you know,

1177
01:03:34.480 --> 01:03:36.599
<v Speaker 1>I can't say I'm not I'm not in that role,

1178
01:03:36.719 --> 01:03:40.639
<v Speaker 1>but I also think i'm less sure about this, and

1179
01:03:40.679 --> 01:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>this would you know, relate to what you're talking about

1180
01:03:42.840 --> 01:03:50.239
<v Speaker 1>with tournaments especially, But I do feel that poker, probably

1181
01:03:50.840 --> 01:03:57.119
<v Speaker 1>for its growth, is slightly held back by being associated

1182
01:03:57.159 --> 01:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>with gambling. It is basically gambling to a very large extent,

1183
01:04:02.519 --> 01:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>but it also has a distinctly different quality, which is

1184
01:04:05.400 --> 01:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that it's a mind sport. In my opinion, I don't know,

1185
01:04:08.519 --> 01:04:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I could imagine a world in which poker sort of

1186
01:04:11.320 --> 01:04:16.519
<v Speaker 1>like again extricates itself from gambling, and there'd be pros

1187
01:04:16.519 --> 01:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and concept there's going to be trade offs to anything,

1188
01:04:19.519 --> 01:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I feel that could potentially be a you know,

1189
01:04:23.440 --> 01:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>positive thing for the growth of the game.

1190
01:04:26.960 --> 01:04:29.119
<v Speaker 2>Do you think we should be allowed to view poker

1191
01:04:29.280 --> 01:04:32.960
<v Speaker 2>as entertainment even though it's a zero sum game, which

1192
01:04:33.000 --> 01:04:35.480
<v Speaker 2>in a way can sort of be a contrast to

1193
01:04:36.400 --> 01:04:41.119
<v Speaker 2>the entertainment side because there's also losers in poker, which

1194
01:04:41.440 --> 01:04:43.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, in golf, if you're a loser, you're still

1195
01:04:43.760 --> 01:04:46.280
<v Speaker 2>on the tour, you're still getting paid, and in poker

1196
01:04:46.320 --> 01:04:48.719
<v Speaker 2>people show up and put their own money down, which

1197
01:04:49.079 --> 01:04:51.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, makes it a different kind of entertainment and

1198
01:04:51.360 --> 01:04:52.719
<v Speaker 2>almost more like reality TV.

1199
01:04:53.599 --> 01:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, not only do I think that it should like

1200
01:04:58.199 --> 01:05:00.159
<v Speaker 1>people can't like should be able to view it that way.

1201
01:05:00.400 --> 01:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>I think that's actually the best way to view it,

1202
01:05:02.039 --> 01:05:06.079
<v Speaker 1>because people play poker for enjoyment primarily, so I don't

1203
01:05:06.079 --> 01:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>see any reason why watching it shouldn't be enjoyable, just

1204
01:05:09.000 --> 01:05:11.599
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that somebody plays golf for fun

1205
01:05:11.840 --> 01:05:14.199
<v Speaker 1>watches golf for fun. So I think it's actually just

1206
01:05:14.280 --> 01:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>much healthier if it's you know, experienced in that way.

1207
01:05:18.880 --> 01:05:20.519
<v Speaker 1>That being said, if we just sort of go back

1208
01:05:20.559 --> 01:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to the obvious follow up question, which is like, well,

1209
01:05:23.039 --> 01:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>why are tournament's not enjoyable to watch? I enjoy watching them,

1210
01:05:27.360 --> 01:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>but I understand that they don't resonate with a wider audience.

1211
01:05:30.480 --> 01:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I think some of that is well, I mean, some

1212
01:05:33.039 --> 01:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of it's based on the fact that, you know, the

1213
01:05:34.519 --> 01:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>format of streams. They're long, and like people that aren't

1214
01:05:37.400 --> 01:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>hardcore fans, they can't sit down and watch streams for

1215
01:05:40.039 --> 01:05:42.199
<v Speaker 1>that long. So yeah, I don't know. Again, I don't

1216
01:05:42.199 --> 01:05:44.239
<v Speaker 1>have all the answers, but I've thought about these things

1217
01:05:44.320 --> 01:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>because I love poker. I think it's immensely fascinating. I

1218
01:05:48.440 --> 01:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>think it would be cool if more people were aware

1219
01:05:50.400 --> 01:05:52.199
<v Speaker 1>of it, whether or not they ever play a hand,

1220
01:05:52.679 --> 01:05:54.639
<v Speaker 1>just being aware of it, I think could be cool.

1221
01:05:54.719 --> 01:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there's implications for education and learning critical thinking

1222
01:05:59.360 --> 01:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and navigate uncertainty that poker offers. I know there was

1223
01:06:02.519 --> 01:06:06.079
<v Speaker 1>one guy I researched this a while ago, many years,

1224
01:06:06.079 --> 01:06:09.079
<v Speaker 1>but there was a Harvard law professor who used poker

1225
01:06:09.480 --> 01:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>as a means to sort of help his students understand

1226
01:06:12.480 --> 01:06:15.119
<v Speaker 1>decision making. I thought that was super cool, and there's

1227
01:06:15.119 --> 01:06:20.039
<v Speaker 1>probably more avenues for which that could be effective or beneficial.

1228
01:06:20.960 --> 01:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>But again, I feel it's you know, when poker has

1229
01:06:23.000 --> 01:06:27.079
<v Speaker 1>a close association with gambling, which again, it obviously has

1230
01:06:27.079 --> 01:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a component of gambling, but I think it's somewhat intellectually

1231
01:06:30.840 --> 01:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>dishonest to assert that it's the same as gambling in

1232
01:06:34.960 --> 01:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the sense that like Blacktacker roulettea craps would be clearly

1233
01:06:38.400 --> 01:06:41.639
<v Speaker 1>it's different. In my opinion, I would presume you agree

1234
01:06:41.639 --> 01:06:42.679
<v Speaker 1>with that, but yeah, yeah, of course.

1235
01:06:42.719 --> 01:06:44.880
<v Speaker 2>And I also think that we shouldn't forget to state

1236
01:06:44.920 --> 01:06:49.920
<v Speaker 2>that like the Marquee events year round draw a massive

1237
01:06:50.199 --> 01:06:53.599
<v Speaker 2>viewership totally. It is just that, you know, to use

1238
01:06:53.719 --> 01:06:57.519
<v Speaker 2>other sports as an example, the weekly game that's being

1239
01:06:57.519 --> 01:07:02.280
<v Speaker 2>streamed doesn't draw this same way the the you know,

1240
01:07:02.320 --> 01:07:04.480
<v Speaker 2>the Masters you know, as if you want to use

1241
01:07:04.480 --> 01:07:06.800
<v Speaker 2>a golf analogy will draw, which also makes sense that

1242
01:07:06.840 --> 01:07:09.880
<v Speaker 2>there's there's sort of a tail off. But the thing

1243
01:07:09.920 --> 01:07:13.360
<v Speaker 2>that I find most fascinating is the and we went

1244
01:07:13.400 --> 01:07:17.039
<v Speaker 2>into this already, but the higher floor for a cash

1245
01:07:17.039 --> 01:07:19.079
<v Speaker 2>game versus a tournament. And I think that's the biggest

1246
01:07:19.079 --> 01:07:22.119
<v Speaker 2>difference that we're seeing in recent years, where I want

1247
01:07:22.119 --> 01:07:27.000
<v Speaker 2>to say, prior to the YouTube era, the tournaments were

1248
01:07:27.039 --> 01:07:29.840
<v Speaker 2>way more featured and way more popular, and then in

1249
01:07:29.920 --> 01:07:33.480
<v Speaker 2>the YouTube era, something has shifted to where cash games

1250
01:07:33.480 --> 01:07:38.000
<v Speaker 2>by nature attract personalities within the game that make it

1251
01:07:38.079 --> 01:07:42.119
<v Speaker 2>super fun to consume because the narrative doesn't change overnight,

1252
01:07:42.159 --> 01:07:45.079
<v Speaker 2>it stays the same within the boundaries of that lineup,

1253
01:07:45.440 --> 01:07:47.599
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to the elimination factor of the tournament. So

1254
01:07:47.599 --> 01:07:50.119
<v Speaker 2>if you're watching because you're a fan of er Liechtenberger

1255
01:07:50.159 --> 01:07:52.840
<v Speaker 2>and he busts in sixth place, then maybe you're tuned

1256
01:07:52.880 --> 01:07:53.440
<v Speaker 2>out after that.

1257
01:07:53.599 --> 01:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, that's fair. I think that one thing cash

1258
01:07:58.440 --> 01:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>games really do offer in that sense, you know, when

1259
01:08:01.760 --> 01:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a game is being streamed, cash games move a lot faster,

1260
01:08:04.519 --> 01:08:09.519
<v Speaker 1>there's less downtime. I think that's where, again, as like

1261
01:08:10.039 --> 01:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a poker nerd who in the in like the early

1262
01:08:13.559 --> 01:08:15.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of boom era, I was like, Hi, I wonder

1263
01:08:15.679 --> 01:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>what these guys would do with like Jack ten offsuit

1264
01:08:17.760 --> 01:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in the spot or whatever. The stream is great, you

1265
01:08:20.039 --> 01:08:22.439
<v Speaker 1>get to see all that, but I'm not sure that

1266
01:08:22.640 --> 01:08:26.239
<v Speaker 1>the casual viewer is going to resonate in the same

1267
01:08:26.359 --> 01:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>sense that you know, someone who's a diehard would be.

1268
01:08:30.640 --> 01:08:34.079
<v Speaker 1>So I think that the stream, I would guess streaming

1269
01:08:34.199 --> 01:08:38.239
<v Speaker 1>is less favorable for tournament views as a result of that.

1270
01:08:38.239 --> 01:08:41.279
<v Speaker 1>That downtime is I think probably why people, you know,

1271
01:08:41.319 --> 01:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>they fairly point out like, hey, we're not interested in this,

1272
01:08:45.520 --> 01:08:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Like I mean, you see in the comment sections, right,

1273
01:08:47.399 --> 01:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>people are just what was the term you said? Is

1274
01:08:49.840 --> 01:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a math contest? Right?

1275
01:08:50.880 --> 01:08:51.439
<v Speaker 2>Math contest?

1276
01:08:51.520 --> 01:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

1277
01:08:51.880 --> 01:08:55.760
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I think I think Alex Foxon used

1278
01:08:55.760 --> 01:08:58.039
<v Speaker 2>the term first. So I want to give credit, but

1279
01:08:58.520 --> 01:09:00.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's not in a negative sense because it

1280
01:09:00.760 --> 01:09:02.640
<v Speaker 2>just means that people are, you know, well prepared for

1281
01:09:02.680 --> 01:09:03.399
<v Speaker 2>the occasion.

1282
01:09:03.520 --> 01:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1283
01:09:03.800 --> 01:09:06.079
<v Speaker 2>Sure, but it's also you need to have a certain

1284
01:09:06.199 --> 01:09:09.279
<v Speaker 2>level of poker understanding to get to get something out

1285
01:09:09.319 --> 01:09:09.520
<v Speaker 2>of that.

1286
01:09:09.880 --> 01:09:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And I think that.

1287
01:09:12.239 --> 01:09:14.199
<v Speaker 2>After more than fifteen years in the game for me

1288
01:09:14.279 --> 01:09:17.239
<v Speaker 2>myself and having done tons of commentary. I do find

1289
01:09:17.239 --> 01:09:21.199
<v Speaker 2>those very fun and interesting, but they become more fun

1290
01:09:21.199 --> 01:09:24.720
<v Speaker 2>and interesting when that environment also has a certain level

1291
01:09:24.720 --> 01:09:27.640
<v Speaker 2>of personality to it. So you guys could be playing

1292
01:09:27.680 --> 01:09:30.760
<v Speaker 2>exactly the same hands, the same exact way, and then

1293
01:09:30.960 --> 01:09:34.800
<v Speaker 2>if you add a Jeremy Becker, who is you know,

1294
01:09:34.880 --> 01:09:37.039
<v Speaker 2>making a bit of a show or Nigranu is there

1295
01:09:37.600 --> 01:09:39.640
<v Speaker 2>just a name to people that come to mind right away,

1296
01:09:40.479 --> 01:09:43.000
<v Speaker 2>that same style of play becomes more fun to watch.

1297
01:09:43.359 --> 01:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree, and I do think that I would

1298
01:09:46.640 --> 01:09:51.079
<v Speaker 1>say most of the best players in the studio are

1299
01:09:51.239 --> 01:09:58.079
<v Speaker 1>quite entertaining, super entertaining, like Foxen's hilarious Soveral absolutely uproariously hilarious,

1300
01:09:58.319 --> 01:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Winter's hilarious Becker. Obviously, I mean, yeah, there's many people

1301
01:10:02.680 --> 01:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that are like, very funny and have a lot of personality,

1302
01:10:05.479 --> 01:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>but when you have a stream that's quite long, those

1303
01:10:08.640 --> 01:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>moments and also, I mean, in fairness, I don't know

1304
01:10:11.960 --> 01:10:14.439
<v Speaker 1>that the stream is being put on to capture those

1305
01:10:14.560 --> 01:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>entertaining moments as like, I mean, you'd know better than me,

1306
01:10:18.960 --> 01:10:22.119
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't feel to me like the desire of

1307
01:10:22.159 --> 01:10:25.039
<v Speaker 1>those PGT final tables is to capture the entertaining moments.

1308
01:10:25.680 --> 01:10:28.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that it's nice when they happen, but the

1309
01:10:28.159 --> 01:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>specific goal is not like, hey, let's encourage I mean,

1310
01:10:31.600 --> 01:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>guess it's not really much you could do to encourage them,

1311
01:10:33.520 --> 01:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>but to capture or highlight them. I think it is

1312
01:10:37.880 --> 01:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>more intriguing for probably most of the people that are

1313
01:10:41.880 --> 01:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>watching tournaments to begin with, and it is the chicken

1314
01:10:43.880 --> 01:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in the egg, right, we're back there. They probably more

1315
01:10:45.840 --> 01:10:49.319
<v Speaker 1>so want to see the sick call or the big

1316
01:10:49.319 --> 01:10:50.239
<v Speaker 1>bluff or whatever.

1317
01:10:50.560 --> 01:10:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I think that the funny thing that ties

1318
01:10:53.600 --> 01:10:58.359
<v Speaker 2>into what you're saying is the fact that fun moments

1319
01:10:58.399 --> 01:11:02.520
<v Speaker 2>happen on every stream, but there's not the like you

1320
01:11:02.560 --> 01:11:05.439
<v Speaker 2>can't plan for them, and they're they're organic, which is

1321
01:11:05.479 --> 01:11:08.239
<v Speaker 2>why the short short form version of it will go

1322
01:11:08.359 --> 01:11:11.399
<v Speaker 2>viral because that's like funny, and that's like, yeah, compelling,

1323
01:11:11.840 --> 01:11:15.279
<v Speaker 2>But the long form format needs to be compelling in

1324
01:11:15.319 --> 01:11:19.439
<v Speaker 2>different ways to keep people watching, which, of course, you

1325
01:11:19.760 --> 01:11:22.079
<v Speaker 2>deal with the way the game runs, and that's just

1326
01:11:22.079 --> 01:11:24.880
<v Speaker 2>sometimes how that goes, and that's fine totally, and you

1327
01:11:24.880 --> 01:11:26.880
<v Speaker 2>can't always hit a home run. Yeah, but I find

1328
01:11:26.880 --> 01:11:30.920
<v Speaker 2>it endlessly fascinating to speculate on what formats could be

1329
01:11:31.000 --> 01:11:34.479
<v Speaker 2>tested and what sort of tweaks. Could there be to

1330
01:11:34.520 --> 01:11:38.119
<v Speaker 2>the point where you know, the regular start protesting like

1331
01:11:38.119 --> 01:11:39.199
<v Speaker 2>this is no longer poker.

1332
01:11:40.159 --> 01:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean these are these are interesting points to

1333
01:11:42.640 --> 01:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>bring up. Far be it from me to say I

1334
01:11:45.760 --> 01:11:48.359
<v Speaker 1>know the answer, because I don't. I'm not a nostrodamus.

1335
01:11:48.439 --> 01:11:51.039
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he knew the answers. But like

1336
01:11:51.439 --> 01:11:54.039
<v Speaker 1>the model that worked during the boom was basically just

1337
01:11:54.079 --> 01:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to cut it up and make effectively a reality show.

1338
01:11:56.600 --> 01:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>They had these vignettes. I have a friend who have

1339
01:11:59.479 --> 01:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>talked about this a lot with and if you see

1340
01:12:01.920 --> 01:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>like an America's Got Talent or the Voice type of show,

1341
01:12:06.840 --> 01:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Shark Tank's a good example. You know, they have like

1342
01:12:09.960 --> 01:12:12.399
<v Speaker 1>a person, they show a little bit of stuff like

1343
01:12:12.399 --> 01:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>they do in their life, and then they have like

1344
01:12:14.840 --> 01:12:17.199
<v Speaker 1>a key moment or two with them and now they're

1345
01:12:17.239 --> 01:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a character. You might come back to them, but then

1346
01:12:18.840 --> 01:12:21.199
<v Speaker 1>you go to like another vignette. I feel that's a

1347
01:12:21.319 --> 01:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>very digestible format of content for poker, and I think

1348
01:12:25.239 --> 01:12:27.439
<v Speaker 1>it suits it quite well because for a long time,

1349
01:12:27.560 --> 01:12:30.199
<v Speaker 1>my sister in law actually is a reality TV show producer.

1350
01:12:30.840 --> 01:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I talked to her a bit about it, and I

1351
01:12:32.960 --> 01:12:35.199
<v Speaker 1>asked her like, you know, if I'm playing and like

1352
01:12:35.239 --> 01:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>you put on the stream, like, can you get into it?

1353
01:12:37.479 --> 01:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>She's like no. I'm like yeah, okay, I mean I'm

1354
01:12:39.880 --> 01:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>not surprised. And you know, it's the same with people

1355
01:12:42.520 --> 01:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that are just casual fans of the game. But if

1356
01:12:46.039 --> 01:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the content, I understand, it's completely different endeavor. You mean,

1357
01:12:48.840 --> 01:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to go into post production and you have

1358
01:12:50.880 --> 01:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to like go send someone out to like interview them

1359
01:12:53.920 --> 01:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and get shots of them on the couch or in

1360
01:12:55.560 --> 01:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>their backyard or whatever. It's completely different. That's not lost

1361
01:12:58.800 --> 01:13:02.439
<v Speaker 1>on me. But I do think that that approach is

1362
01:13:03.800 --> 01:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>just more well suited for poker because the sport itself,

1363
01:13:07.920 --> 01:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>if you want to call it a sport, a mind sport,

1364
01:13:09.680 --> 01:13:13.279
<v Speaker 1>as I think of it, it doesn't really that easily

1365
01:13:13.359 --> 01:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>lend itself to being entertaining from a spectator standpoint if

1366
01:13:16.840 --> 01:13:20.159
<v Speaker 1>you're just watching the raw footage. Could we evolve poker

1367
01:13:20.199 --> 01:13:23.159
<v Speaker 1>tournaments or poker in general in a way where you

1368
01:13:23.199 --> 01:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>could get like a stadium of fans. To me, it's conceivable,

1369
01:13:27.239 --> 01:13:29.319
<v Speaker 1>but we're kind of not really. To me, that's like

1370
01:13:29.600 --> 01:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a far fetched goal. At the moment. I think just

1371
01:13:33.680 --> 01:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>getting viewership up and having more people be aware of

1372
01:13:38.239 --> 01:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>pokercause a lot of people that I talk to about poker,

1373
01:13:41.439 --> 01:13:43.399
<v Speaker 1>because again, I really do make an effort when I

1374
01:13:43.439 --> 01:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>go out in the world and I, like, you know,

1375
01:13:46.119 --> 01:13:48.159
<v Speaker 1>meet people and they say what do you do, and

1376
01:13:48.199 --> 01:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I say, I play poker. A lot of people cannot

1377
01:13:50.800 --> 01:13:53.039
<v Speaker 1>tell the difference between poker and blackjack. To them, it's

1378
01:13:53.079 --> 01:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>just the same thing. It's cards you're betting. I just think,

1379
01:13:56.680 --> 01:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, for starters, that would be cool if there

1380
01:13:58.640 --> 01:14:01.239
<v Speaker 1>was a distinction between that in just the public consciousness

1381
01:14:01.239 --> 01:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of humanity.

1382
01:14:02.800 --> 01:14:05.479
<v Speaker 2>Really or we should stream more Blackcheck for that.

1383
01:14:07.880 --> 01:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Intuition in Blackchack could be useful. Who knows.

1384
01:14:09.960 --> 01:14:11.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean we we already have those mixed events, so

1385
01:14:11.960 --> 01:14:15.079
<v Speaker 2>I hold them plo, yeah, hold them Blackcheck.

1386
01:14:15.119 --> 01:14:17.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean they run bakara tournaments, right, yeah, why not

1387
01:14:17.479 --> 01:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>slot tournament? You can do it all.

1388
01:14:20.000 --> 01:14:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Luzeberger, thank you so much for coming on the show.

1389
01:14:21.840 --> 01:14:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me.

1390
01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:26.359
<v Speaker 2>I really appreciate it. And we'll have to start Poker Dads,

1391
01:14:26.439 --> 01:14:26.960
<v Speaker 2>the podcast.

1392
01:14:27.239 --> 01:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm down.

1393
01:14:27.640 --> 01:14:29.119
<v Speaker 2>There's so many people that we could have on the show.

1394
01:14:29.199 --> 01:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>One hundred. Everyone's a dad now, yeah.

1395
01:14:31.680 --> 01:14:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Everybody used to be a twenty one year old basement

1396
01:14:34.079 --> 01:14:36.920
<v Speaker 2>kid and everyone has children. It's kind of crazy. It's great,

1397
01:14:37.600 --> 01:14:39.680
<v Speaker 2>good evolution. Once again, Andre luiz Berger, thank you so

1398
01:14:39.800 --> 01:14:41.399
<v Speaker 2>much for being on the show. You guys at home,

1399
01:14:41.439 --> 01:14:44.079
<v Speaker 2>please like the video, subscribe to the channel. We've got

1400
01:14:44.079 --> 01:14:45.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot more of these coming in the next couple

1401
01:14:45.840 --> 01:14:47.920
<v Speaker 2>of weeks, so stay tuned for more, and for now,

1402
01:14:47.960 --> 01:14:48.560
<v Speaker 2>thanks for watching.
