Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday the seventh, and
Speaker 2: may you're of our Lord twenty twenty six. Well, to
Speaker 2: every lie, turn turn turn, there is a season, turn
Speaker 2: turn turn, and a reason for this, a time for
Speaker 2: them to have been big profits under the sun. And
Speaker 2: we have another example of this that has happened. We
Speaker 2: just had some insider trading yesterday and Trump is coming
Speaker 2: out talking about, hey, you know, the whole world is
Speaker 2: a casino when he's asked about insider trading. The corruption
Speaker 2: is amazing. And we have Lucky Lutnik who made another
Speaker 2: appearance before Congress, but you're not allowed to see what
Speaker 2: he did. Not allowed to read the transcript yet either,
Speaker 2: but there's going to be no video at all about that. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: you have the ADL demanding a billion dollars from taxpayers
Speaker 2: for security quote unquote, while Israel is spending three quarters
Speaker 2: of a billion on lies and propaganda and politicians. And
Speaker 2: then we'll take a look at our self worshiping leader
Speaker 2: for a building places where you can go worship them.
Speaker 2: They call them libraries. Should call him just lies. That's
Speaker 2: what these people do. Obama has opened his and there's
Speaker 2: some local people who are not very happy at all
Speaker 2: about what he's doing. Well, let's take a look at
Speaker 2: Lucky Lutnick as they came out that Democrats were furious
Speaker 2: at what was happening.
Speaker 1: This.
Speaker 2: I can't believe this guy. He is a pathological liar
Speaker 2: that the American people need to see not just a
Speaker 2: transcript of his evasive answers, but they need to see
Speaker 2: him sweating as he's being asked these questions. Again, this
Speaker 2: is all happening in the context of Operation Epstein. Liar
Speaker 2: is as we see Trump spinning what is happening in
Speaker 2: the mitt least spinning it for profits? Who knows? I
Speaker 2: mean these guys who operate on Wall Street like Lutnick,
Speaker 2: That's exactly the kind of thing you would expect them
Speaker 2: to do, isn't it. And these are big bets. I mean,
Speaker 2: this latest one that happened in the wee hours of
Speaker 2: the morning. That's the other thing makes it very suspicious.
Speaker 2: Nearly a billion, Yeah, and there was no public information
Speaker 2: lead up to that at all. Anyway, this is a
Speaker 2: closed door testimony, no video allowed, as they came out
Speaker 2: had people like this. Democrat James Walkinshaw said Lutnick struggled
Speaker 2: to answer even basic questions. He's lying Today's transcribed interview
Speaker 2: as part of the ongoing cover up, because the American
Speaker 2: people deserve to see the video of what's taking place
Speaker 2: in there. They deserve to see the sweat on his
Speaker 2: brow as he struggles to answer basic questions and lies
Speaker 2: to the American people. Unfortunately, it appears that Secretary Liutnik
Speaker 2: is not going to take any responsibility for lying to
Speaker 2: the American people today or any other day. By the way,
Speaker 2: I'll say, like, this is the way the politicians operate,
Speaker 2: and it's bipartisan as well. They never admit that they're lying,
Speaker 2: no matter how they get caught red handed. It's just
Speaker 2: just amazing to me. That's one of the one of
Speaker 2: the personality distinctions that's required to be a politician. You
Speaker 2: get caught red handed committing a crime or lying, it's like,
Speaker 2: this isn't what you think it is, This isn't really happening. Rocanna,
Speaker 2: the Minority Leader of the House, said Trump would fire
Speaker 2: Lutnick if you heard the answers that he gave, adding
Speaker 2: that Lutnick's performance was quote really embarrassing. Yeah, I don't
Speaker 2: think that he would fire him for committing perjury. Probably
Speaker 2: promote him. Hey, this guy's good at this stuff. I
Speaker 2: got to get him a higher level job. But no,
Speaker 2: he's right where he wants to be, being Secretary Commerce,
Speaker 2: just like Trump's first Secretary Commerce, Web Ross, who is
Speaker 2: a rosschild guy all of his life. Well, Lutnick has
Speaker 2: got his connections as well, mister stable Coin, the guy
Speaker 2: I call Lucky Lutnick because he just happened to be
Speaker 2: taking his kid to kindergarten the day of nine to
Speaker 2: eleven as all of his employees, including his brother, died.
Speaker 2: So yeah, it's uh, and I'm aware of that. As
Speaker 2: a matter of fact. Somebody said, well, he couldn't have
Speaker 2: taken that. He couldn't have known about that in advance.
Speaker 2: I mean, he might let his employees die, but he
Speaker 2: wouldn't let his brother die, to which I was say,
Speaker 2: are you sure about that? That's not the way I
Speaker 2: read this guy anyway. Files revealed that his family visited
Speaker 2: the island four years after Epstein was convicted on prostitution charges,
Speaker 2: including involving a minor. Well, hey, I'm sure what he
Speaker 2: says is Hey, they were just minor offenses, right, That's
Speaker 2: that's his excuse, I guess. But look, he was a
Speaker 2: next door neighbor. They go over and he says, yeah,
Speaker 2: I met him once, met him once, only a right,
Speaker 2: and he said, this guy is really creepy. We're not
Speaker 2: gonna my wife friend. Then you find out that was
Speaker 2: his story. Then you find out when the documents come
Speaker 2: out that he not only went to his island and
Speaker 2: took his wife and hiss, but then he does business
Speaker 2: deals with Epstein as well. We see all that in there.
Speaker 2: So again he's spinning all of this stuff, and you
Speaker 2: have comer saying, isn't it great? Look at our transparency here?
Speaker 2: How many times would you have somebody bring in a
Speaker 2: cabinet secretary to testify? Never see that happening before, to
Speaker 2: which I would respond, well, we didn't have these kind
Speaker 2: of corrupt cabinet secretaries to start with in the past.
Speaker 2: Maybe there's two ways you can look at that it
Speaker 2: wasn't necessary and a lot of administrations to bring in
Speaker 2: the kinds of people that Trump has hired. Another Democrat,
Speaker 2: I'm sorry from Arizona Accusedleutnika being a pathological liar who
Speaker 2: is enabling the most egregious cover up in American history.
Speaker 2: The level of lies that are taking place inside that
Speaker 2: room with that video is unbelievable, and it's part of
Speaker 2: this egregious cover up. Well, he was a part of
Speaker 2: another egregious cover up on nine to eleven. I recommend
Speaker 2: every single American when this interview is released, read the
Speaker 2: document in full, and so one person coming after what
Speaker 2: we've seen so far in this transcribed interview, I feel
Speaker 2: very comfortable saying that Howard Lutnik is a pathological liar
Speaker 2: who is enabling this egregious cover up. But we haven't
Speaker 2: seen it. They haven't released it to the public. So
Speaker 2: this is a member of Congress who I guess was
Speaker 2: not in there on that committee hearing, who've got an
Speaker 2: early copy of the transcription. Just doesn't do it justice.
Speaker 2: I'm sure another Democrat, this one from Virginia. And I
Speaker 2: don't know how to pronounce this man or woman's name.
Speaker 2: I can't tell from first name of mail. It's like
Speaker 2: Sue has Subrahmanyam.
Speaker 3: Or something that's a that's a classic American family name.
Speaker 3: We've all grown up next to us Subrahmanyam.
Speaker 2: And you got to keep up with it too, got
Speaker 2: to keep up with the Subrahman Yams.
Speaker 3: I remember thinking to myself, those Subrahman Yams, good hard
Speaker 3: working American stock.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they've done better than us Americans. We're just failures
Speaker 2: to bring in some more of those h one b Subamernams.
Speaker 3: Is left.
Speaker 2: Whoever this is, was left dumbfounded by litnux Deescermony went
Speaker 2: so far as calling for the secretary to resign. I'm
Speaker 2: sure that don't happen anyway. He said that was absolutely
Speaker 2: mind boggling what we just heard in the room. He
Speaker 2: was evasive, nervous, dishonest. He would not admit to lying.
Speaker 2: He said he was never in the room with Jeffrey
Speaker 2: Epstein ever again after the first time he met him.
Speaker 2: Yet he then admitted that he was in the room
Speaker 2: with Jeffrey Epstein. I had to ask him whether he
Speaker 2: and I were in the same room, because I couldn't
Speaker 2: understand what his meaning of we were in the room together,
Speaker 2: same room together, what that really meant? Right? This is
Speaker 2: this is the level of it. Several of them have
Speaker 2: pointed out, Yeah, he's playing games with the word we
Speaker 2: and I. Of course that's what Bill Clinton did, right,
Speaker 2: Remember that so again, what is the meaning of his
Speaker 2: is The full transcript of lutnix hearing had not yet
Speaker 2: been published as of the time this article went as
Speaker 2: of last night. Meanwhile, as a as one headline points out,
Speaker 2: Rokana simply exploded on him in anger. He said it
Speaker 2: was contortions, lies, no acknowledgment that he miss led the
Speaker 2: American public. Is he talking about Lutnix Epstein testimony or
Speaker 2: is he talking about Trump's war war tweets and all
Speaker 2: the rest of this stuff. I think it's going to
Speaker 2: be an epic book written about how what bad leadership
Speaker 2: looks like when they talk about Donald Trump, and how
Speaker 2: you just throw stuff out off the off the top
Speaker 2: of your head. You don't shoot from the hip, you
Speaker 2: shoot from the lip. On social media, you're constantly flip
Speaker 2: flopping back and forth, and maybe there is a real
Speaker 2: purpose to that. Somebody is making a ton of money
Speaker 2: off of this stuff. So again, that's what politicians do,
Speaker 2: but this one has set all new levels of it.
Speaker 2: He was trying to define eyes of saying that what
Speaker 2: he really meant is that he would not see Epstein alone,
Speaker 2: but was totally fine with having his wife and kids
Speaker 2: see him originally said that Epstein engaged in blackmail and
Speaker 2: recorded videotapes. Now he's saying, well, I was wrong, he
Speaker 2: was just speculating, and Epstein actually didn't engage in blackmailing.
Speaker 2: Did someone tell him to say that? I've not seen
Speaker 2: anywhere that Epstein never engaged in blackmail. Why is it
Speaker 2: that Howard.
Speaker 3: Sound like someone being blackmailed would say blackmail material. I
Speaker 3: don't know anything about that, as he sweats profusely.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and of course he had no connection with Massadi though,
Speaker 2: we just forget about all of that. That really didn't happen.
Speaker 3: Was there a little red dot that was moving from
Speaker 3: his head to his heart back and forth a little
Speaker 3: bit as he talked?
Speaker 2: Yeah, Yeah, it's just amazing. You know. They like to
Speaker 2: sell this idea that there was no connection to Massad,
Speaker 2: and yet when you look at Gallayne Maxwell's father, Robert Maxwell,
Speaker 2: this guy was like a triple agent spy. I mean
Speaker 2: he was spying for everybody against everybody else. He's fying
Speaker 2: for the British, the Russians, Massad all you know, and
Speaker 2: informing on everybody else. He had absolutely no allegiance to anybody,
Speaker 2: apparently except Massad, because when he died, Massad honored him
Speaker 2: with a special burial and all the rest of the stuff. So,
Speaker 2: I mean, you know, he was their guy, but he
Speaker 2: was presenting himself as an agent to other countries at
Speaker 2: the same time. So he said I was never in
Speaker 2: the room with him socially for business or even philanthropy.
Speaker 2: He called him a disgusting person. But then we find
Speaker 2: out that later on, even after Epstein was convicted, as
Speaker 2: we point out because of the documents, that he was
Speaker 2: connected to him both socially and financially for business and
Speaker 2: did that business at the island. So again the I
Speaker 2: guess maybe he could say, hey, I was with him
Speaker 2: at the island. I'm not in the room with him.
Speaker 2: I mean we're out there on the island doing whatever
Speaker 2: you do on that island.
Speaker 3: H Yeah, just a U island thing.
Speaker 2: So yeah, James Comer says, well, in the lead up
Speaker 2: to this, he goes on Fox News and he's got
Speaker 2: an interview there and he says, well, you know, litt
Speaker 2: Nick wasn't one truthful, wasn't one. In other words, he
Speaker 2: told some lies. But he can't say that right. This
Speaker 2: is part of the Trump GOP guarding our pedophiles cover up,
Speaker 2: and Thomas Massey went on with Tucker Carlson and talked
Speaker 2: about the extent to which this is really the pressure
Speaker 2: campaign that was put on members of Congress to not
Speaker 2: sign this discharge petition.
Speaker 4: For taking on those threats. Lauren Bobert, they took her
Speaker 4: over to the situation room, right like, this is where
Speaker 4: if they're trying to kill or capture Osama bin Laden,
Speaker 4: this is where they are at the White House. They
Speaker 4: took her into the situation room and tried to whip
Speaker 4: her into taking her name off of the discharge petition
Speaker 4: over Epstein, over Epstein, yep. And then the President vetoed
Speaker 4: a bill that would have brought water to a large
Speaker 4: portion of Colorado over Epstein, over Epstein. And this isn't
Speaker 4: even at this point. It's not just about Lauren Bobert.
Speaker 4: Why are people in Colorado deprived of water because their
Speaker 4: representative wants to expose a sex trafficking ring.
Speaker 5: I mean, none of this makes any sense at all.
Speaker 2: Well it does if you look at the tariffs. I mean,
Speaker 2: why should we be punished because Trump is angry at
Speaker 2: some politician in another country, and so he's going to
Speaker 2: bust the supply lines for a lot of essential materials,
Speaker 2: even for American manufacturers. Okay, but when you look at this,
Speaker 2: just a reminder, Thomas Massey's election is coming up in
Speaker 2: just a couple of weeks and his opponent hand picked
Speaker 2: by Trump and Trump's donor owner Class APAC. His opponent,
Speaker 2: Ed Gallerin, has gotten ten million dollars nine point eight
Speaker 2: million dollars from Israel and Israeli billionaires. Massey hasn't gotten
Speaker 2: a cent. This is an opportunity for us to push
Speaker 2: back against this takeover of our government by foreign government
Speaker 2: that has held bent on ripping us off and putting
Speaker 2: us into wars again. You have the eight well is
Speaker 2: out there demanding a billion dollars for protection.
Speaker 6: We helped secure a thirty million dollar increase for the
Speaker 6: nonprofit security Grant program for the fiscal year twenty twenty six.
Speaker 6: That funding is critical. It supports the security cameras outside
Speaker 6: of your synagogue, the train guard TAKESPI, that CC door,
Speaker 6: the reinforced entrance at your day school. But we're not
Speaker 6: right now, we are calling on Congress to fund a
Speaker 6: program the program at one billion dollars because demand continues
Speaker 6: to outpace the funding, leaving thousands of applicants without the
Speaker 6: support that they need. Now you heard mention of buffer
Speaker 6: zone legislation in New York City and a push for
Speaker 6: a federal version. The Sacred Act would establish one hundred
Speaker 6: foot safe foot safe access zone around houses of worship nationwide,
Speaker 6: protecting people to the right to pray without being blocked, harassed,
Speaker 6: or intimidated.
Speaker 2: Laws will never protect people.
Speaker 6: Urging Congress to pass it now.
Speaker 2: And he got three hundred million dollars for synagogues, not
Speaker 2: a penny for church's securities.
Speaker 6: Has filed shareholder proposals pushing for accountability on anti semitism
Speaker 6: and hate at major platforms like Meta, and has already
Speaker 6: drawn significant investor.
Speaker 2: Support to destroy free speed.
Speaker 6: Sematism carries consequences in the boardroom too, and we intend
Speaker 6: to make that case clearly so.
Speaker 2: They can boycott corporations. But you better not boycott Israel. Okay,
Speaker 2: then you're in big trouble with these guys. I'm disgusted
Speaker 2: with the double standard. I am disgusted with how they
Speaker 2: steal money from us and then try to destroy parts
Speaker 2: of our law and constitution that protect our God given rights. Loo.
Speaker 2: I oppose this Sacred Act that they have just like
Speaker 2: I oppose the Face Act. The Face Act was set
Speaker 2: up for free access to abortion clinics, and then they
Speaker 2: put a little writer in there and say, oh, by
Speaker 2: the way, you know, we'll protect you or do something
Speaker 2: about it if somebody harasses you at a place of worship.
Speaker 2: And so that you've got the people that are affiliated
Speaker 2: with Pete Hegseth and Doug Wilson when they get they
Speaker 2: get their worship service disrupted by Don Lemon, they want
Speaker 2: that enforced. Look, we don't want to be a part
Speaker 2: of this. As far as I look at this, it's
Speaker 2: very much like homeschoolers want to take money from the state.
Speaker 2: It's like, don't you realize where that leads? And I
Speaker 2: don't want to see that happen. I don't want to
Speaker 2: see the government coming in and fortifying churches and that
Speaker 2: type of thing. Certainly, you can do your own security,
Speaker 2: and you should do your own security, but that's not
Speaker 2: their way. Their way is to get hundreds of millions,
Speaker 2: and now they want a billion dollars to have all
Speaker 2: kinds of hardened entrances to their synagogues and all the
Speaker 2: rest of the stuff, and they want laws all over
Speaker 2: the place. I want to shut down free speech, free
Speaker 2: exercise of religion, and what people's opinions are. Look, I
Speaker 2: have nothing but contempt for what these Zionists are doing.
Speaker 2: It's just amazing. Every day you see how they are
Speaker 2: stealing more money from us and then stealing our god
Speaker 2: given rights as well, are attempting to So again Fox
Speaker 2: News is bragging about the fact that this guy would
Speaker 2: even be brought in, that Lutnick would even be brought in.
Speaker 2: It's pretty extraordinary to bring in a cabinet secretary or something,
Speaker 2: isn't it, said a program on Fox News to Comber
Speaker 2: that he was interviewing. Comber says, yeah, and look, I've
Speaker 2: been on the Oversight committee for ten years. There's never
Speaker 2: been a chairman bring in a bring in cabinet secretaries
Speaker 2: of their own party. Maybe it's because we've never seen
Speaker 2: this kind of level of open corruption before, not even
Speaker 2: in the district of criminals. So let's talk about this
Speaker 2: insider trading thing. While you've got Lutnik there, maybe you
Speaker 2: should ask him about the insider trading since he's a
Speaker 2: market guy that's there, who's doing this and what's happening
Speaker 2: with us? Again, another one of these on the so
Speaker 2: called war news, which turns out cannot be news at all.
Speaker 2: It's just Trump who is spinning and turning and spinning
Speaker 2: and turning one lie after the other. And so it
Speaker 2: was on Wednesday, early in the morning, there was a
Speaker 2: nine hundred and twenty million dollars bet placed on crude
Speaker 2: oil shorts just an hour before a fake report that
Speaker 2: a peace deal was close you had at three forty am.
Speaker 2: That's the other thing is very suspicious about this. Markets
Speaker 2: are closed, but somebody is able to get in there
Speaker 2: without any news happening. At three forty in the morning,
Speaker 2: they go in and place a nine hundred and twenty
Speaker 2: million dollar bet. One hour and ten minutes later, at
Speaker 2: four point fifty am, Axios breaks the story, and the
Speaker 2: story was that there was a one page memo of understanding.
Speaker 2: I was going to talk about this yesterday. I mentioned
Speaker 2: it briefly with Joel Slenty. But you know, this is
Speaker 2: a memo of understanding. So we've just got a couple
Speaker 2: of simple little things there, and that's going to be
Speaker 2: the basis of our peace agreement. And I was going
Speaker 2: to say when I we didn't get into it with Gerald,
Speaker 2: but you know, I've seen what this administration did with
Speaker 2: a memo of understanding in Panama, and you better get
Speaker 2: that in both English and Farsi, because it has been
Speaker 2: something of a farce the way they have conducted this.
Speaker 2: When they did an MoU with Panama, there was one
Speaker 2: version of it in Spanish, the native language there in Panama,
Speaker 2: and then there was another version in English that was different.
Speaker 2: And so they gave the Spanish memo of understanding to
Speaker 2: the Panamanian newspapers, they published it, and then somebody noticed
Speaker 2: that there was on the the White House website there
Speaker 2: was an English version that was completely different, and so
Speaker 2: the papers and Panama did a report about that, and
Speaker 2: they took that memo down and they still haven't put
Speaker 2: it back up. So yeah, two different languages will give
Speaker 2: you two different versions of what they understand it to be.
Speaker 2: So everything about this folks is rigged. Everything about it
Speaker 2: is corrupt. And the wee hours of the morning nearly
Speaker 2: a billion dollar bet placed one hour before story breaks,
Speaker 2: which and of itself is false as well. And so
Speaker 2: then somebody asked Trump about this insider trading stuff, and
Speaker 2: he has a nerve to say this.
Speaker 7: Against his team that would be no good, But he
Speaker 7: bettered his own team I'll look into it, yeh.
Speaker 8: We also may you know they're being placed as well
Speaker 8: on the Ran conflict to where there are bits some
Speaker 8: trattees where people suspect that there's inside of trading having
Speaker 8: on these veration moneys around the corps.
Speaker 7: Well, you know, the whole world unfortunately, has become somewhat
Speaker 7: of a casino.
Speaker 2: And he's bankrupting the whole world, like his casino.
Speaker 7: World in Europe and every place. They're doing these betting things.
Speaker 7: I was never much in favor of it. I don't
Speaker 7: like it conceptually, but he got burned on bat I
Speaker 7: think that I'm not happy with any of this stuff.
Speaker 7: But they have all the different sites, they have predictive markets.
Speaker 7: It's a crazy world. It's a much different world than
Speaker 7: it was.
Speaker 2: Please, hey, it's not me. It's poly market right, Well,
Speaker 2: it's the inside of trading that people in and around
Speaker 2: you are working on here. But now there's no corruption
Speaker 2: to see. Don't worry about that. It's all forty chess. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: you have the head of Trump's FHA, Bill Poulti. His
Speaker 2: family owned Pulty homes, so he gets in the FHA
Speaker 2: area anyway. He is the one who did the deep
Speaker 2: dive on Trump's political enemies Lisa Cook at the Federal
Speaker 2: Reserve because he didn't like her opposition to him wanting
Speaker 2: to lower rates, and then going after Leticia James. And
Speaker 2: I think, you know, Letitia James is a corrupt state
Speaker 2: attorney general, no question about it. And I really don't
Speaker 2: like Letitia James. I've seen her threaten people over minor things,
Speaker 2: very politicized, and she was the one that I blame
Speaker 2: as much as anybody for getting Trump elected because it
Speaker 2: was her over the top lawfair persecution that I think
Speaker 2: helped him so much in the primaries.
Speaker 3: But I'm never sure she's the one that got v
Speaker 3: dare shut down as well.
Speaker 2: Yes, and she came after Infra Wars because they were
Speaker 2: talking about silver being protective against a lot of different things,
Speaker 2: and it is. And rather than fight that, Alex just
Speaker 2: surrendered and removed all the silver products I understand.
Speaker 3: And then I think shuffled them over to be under
Speaker 3: a different umbrella and went back to selling them at
Speaker 3: some point, memory serves.
Speaker 2: I don't know if they started selling them again or not,
Speaker 2: because I've had people with contact me and say, yeah,
Speaker 2: where can I get some of this stuff? Because I
Speaker 2: used to use a silver toothpaste and some of these
Speaker 2: other things. I don't know if they're selling it now
Speaker 2: or not. Maybe now this whole new operation, maybe they're
Speaker 2: doing it. I don't know. And nevertheless, she's a crook.
Speaker 2: She politically intimidates people that she doesn't like, and yet
Speaker 2: Trump is going after her. Has basically adopted the typical
Speaker 2: tool of tyrants. It was either Stalin. It's attributed to
Speaker 2: either Stalin or his chief of secret police, the phraser
Speaker 2: and bring me the man. I'll find the crime. And
Speaker 2: that's what they're doing with this, and how are they
Speaker 2: doing it. They're doing with artificial intelligence. I find this
Speaker 2: to be a very disturbing precedent that's happening here. If
Speaker 2: you can go back and you've got somebody that you
Speaker 2: want to punish, you go back and you look throughout
Speaker 2: everything in their life and you find a oh, well,
Speaker 2: they said they were going to take out this mortgage
Speaker 2: for their own personal use, and yet they didn't live there.
Speaker 2: They put a relative there or something like that, and
Speaker 2: so we're going to call it rental property and we're
Speaker 2: going to go after them for criminal charges. I'm sorry,
Speaker 2: but I have a problem with that use of AI,
Speaker 2: and we've seen it with dose as well. They've been
Speaker 2: storing information forever about each and every one of us.
Speaker 2: Now with artificial intelligence, they can go back and look
Speaker 2: throughout all this information. They can now data mine it,
Speaker 2: they can collate it, they can find the crime if
Speaker 2: you're somebody they don't like. So anyway, he goes on
Speaker 2: with CNN CNBC, they ask him if this is political. Oh, no,
Speaker 2: it's not. From my perspective, it's not political at all.
Speaker 2: It doesn't matter if you're a Republican or Democrat to me,
Speaker 2: or if you're a Fed governor or whatever. If you
Speaker 2: commit mortgage fraud, we're going to refer it for a crime.
Speaker 2: That's what we did with Lisa cookcase. That is not
Speaker 2: what is happening here. And again, I don't think that
Speaker 2: the Federal Reserve should be independent. I don't like the
Speaker 2: Federal Reserve at all, and I don't think the people
Speaker 2: that work there need to be held to a different standard,
Speaker 2: which is what they're saying here. But I'm really concerned
Speaker 2: about the fact that any bureaucrat can go through and
Speaker 2: audit somebody to find the crime. Trump has sought to
Speaker 2: ounced her for nearly a year, demanding that she resigned
Speaker 2: over the mortgage fraud allegations that were brought by Poltye,
Speaker 2: before then trying to fire her. She refused to resign,
Speaker 2: so then he said, okay, well then I'll fire you.
Speaker 2: She then sued Trump, claiming that his administration had no
Speaker 2: cause to dismiss her. In January, the Supreme Court ruled
Speaker 2: and paused her removal. Trump has asked the Supreme Court
Speaker 2: to stay an appeals ruling that she can keep her job,
Speaker 2: which is supposed to be independent from the executive branch
Speaker 2: and from political interference. Again, just more evidence of corruption
Speaker 2: of mafia like vendettas. This is what we say from
Speaker 2: the Trump administration. Well, we're gonna take a quick break.
Speaker 3: And we actually have quite a few comments here before
Speaker 3: we go. Okay, I want to start with.
Speaker 2: Tony's gonna be joining us today. I don't know if
Speaker 2: you have you connected with Tony.
Speaker 3: I have not connected with him yet, but I have
Speaker 3: sent the info. When I say thank you to Doug Lug,
Speaker 3: he says, happy belated birthday, David, thank you for a
Speaker 3: great podcast. Well, so thank you very much, Doug Lug.
Speaker 3: We appreciate that. Thank you and we also have Wally
Speaker 3: Wallace Bebe still has Epstein's blackmail material on Trump. I
Speaker 3: believe it.
Speaker 2: I do too, I do too. Yeah, that's what the
Speaker 2: real purpose was about all this stuff.
Speaker 3: I want to say thank you to North American House
Speaker 3: Hippo as well. He was very kind and generous, he
Speaker 3: says Lucky Lutnix. I was like a guy who should
Speaker 3: be running an easy credit used car lot in downtown
Speaker 3: Brooklyn and running commercials late at night on New York
Speaker 3: One and w P i X ask Karen if you
Speaker 3: need a translation.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, oh yeah, that's right. Well, you know, we're
Speaker 2: talking about the the the real estate. I don't know
Speaker 2: what they call them, conventions or whatever. They have events
Speaker 2: where people can go in and they can buy stolen
Speaker 2: land that Israel has stolen from people in Palestine. So
Speaker 2: they have this and like I said, it's really kind
Speaker 2: of funny. It's like someone watches out of the back
Speaker 2: of your trunk. You know, hey, look I sold I
Speaker 2: stole this, and now I'm gonna sell it to a
Speaker 2: fellow Jews. They're gonna rip off. So it's amazing. We
Speaker 2: see that kind of stuff all the time in New
Speaker 2: York Way.
Speaker 3: We also have North American as Hipo again, and I
Speaker 3: want to say thank you again, very generous. One of
Speaker 3: the many places I lived as a boy was Canada's
Speaker 3: Northwest territories. When I was five, my dad told me,
Speaker 3: when you see a moose dying in the woods, that's
Speaker 3: when it is that it's most dangerous.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well I've never seen I've seen a moose dying
Speaker 3: in the woods. I've only very rarely seen moose at all.
Speaker 2: Well, speaking of moose, I gotta say I think that
Speaker 2: Trump's cabinet, all our alumni of Watsamata you, they're full
Speaker 2: of bullwinkle as far as I'm concerned. Yeah, you're having more?
Speaker 3: Is that one? More from North American House Hippo as well?
Speaker 3: And he says one of the many places I lived
Speaker 3: as a boy, was I already read that one? I
Speaker 3: guess we don't have any more. And I'm just being silly,
Speaker 3: but thank you North American House Hippo.
Speaker 2: All right, yes, thank you very much. We're going to
Speaker 2: take a quick break, folks, and we'll be right back.
Speaker 2: Stay with us.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 9: APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your
Speaker 9: mobile device, get the APS radio app today and listen
Speaker 9: wherever you go.
Speaker 2: I just won't say before we continue. And I'm way
Speaker 2: overdue and thinking people who helped us a week ago
Speaker 2: when we had the matching funds. They had Mary Ellen
Speaker 2: Moore who provided matching funds, and we had a lot
Speaker 2: of people who wish me happy birthday as well as
Speaker 2: jumped in the very end of the month and got
Speaker 2: us up to a full gas tank. And I did
Speaker 2: not think the people who contributed on zell. We mentioned
Speaker 2: the ones who contributed on Rumble and other live formats,
Speaker 2: but let me just read those names real quickly here
Speaker 2: and thank them for it. Was very generous and made
Speaker 2: a big difference in the month. We have George s
Speaker 2: Kelly and M Brandon, M. Kimberly, M Gregory, C. Craig, M,
Speaker 2: Michael P. Charles, D mark Y, Janie w. And then
Speaker 2: we also had some people who contributed on cash App,
Speaker 2: and we had some big contributors on cash app. We
Speaker 2: had we had Braxton, We had Dave Banks, we had
Speaker 2: Handy and Randy, two separate people they rhyme together and
Speaker 2: Francisco see thank you so much. I appreciate all of
Speaker 2: your support and made a huge difference. And thank you
Speaker 2: for all of the birthday wishes. We had so many
Speaker 2: of them. I won't go through and read them all,
Speaker 2: but I really do appreciate all the birthday wishes because
Speaker 2: it was the last day of the month to end
Speaker 2: my birthday as well.
Speaker 3: So thank you again, Yes, thank you all very much.
Speaker 3: And I did miss part of the comment from North
Speaker 3: American House Hippo, of course. It was talking about how
Speaker 3: dangerous a moose is when it's signing. He says, the
Speaker 3: US government is that moose. It is dying, It is
Speaker 3: thrashing around. It has nothing to lose, and it doesn't
Speaker 3: care who it takes out before it finally succumbs. Stay
Speaker 3: one hundred meters back.
Speaker 2: That's absolutely right. Well, one of the things I mentioned
Speaker 2: yesterday briefly, and we'll talk about this more when Tony
Speaker 2: joins US is the US trade difference that actually grew.
Speaker 2: Was supposed to go the other direction, wasn't it with
Speaker 2: the tariffs. And yet it's just another example of how
Speaker 2: Trump's policies, even though they were bad in inception, they're
Speaker 2: even worse in execution. Even when he's got the right
Speaker 2: idea about a particular policy. The way that he does
Speaker 2: it so frequently sets up a horrible precedent and keeps
Speaker 2: it from actually working. And of course the terrorists are
Speaker 2: attax it's paid by consumers, and you can not tax
Speaker 2: your way to prosperity. He's totally blind to the fact
Speaker 2: that it is deregulation that is needed. They want to
Speaker 2: go back and look at the teriffs that happened in
Speaker 2: the eighteen eighties and say, well, that's the basis of
Speaker 2: our prosperity. No, that is the perspective of a statist
Speaker 2: democrat or republican. But that is not the reality. When
Speaker 2: you go back and look at the regulatory situation. Back
Speaker 2: in the eighteen eighties, people were free to start businesses,
Speaker 2: they were free to try all kinds of things that
Speaker 2: you are prohibited from doing now, And so that's the reality.
Speaker 2: This is not. You know, this is something that happened
Speaker 2: at the same time, but it's no more related to
Speaker 2: it than the steam engine. Right. You could look at
Speaker 2: this and say, well, if we only ran everything on
Speaker 2: steam engines, we'd be doing great, like they did in
Speaker 2: the eighteen hundreds. Now, they did great in eighteen hundreds
Speaker 2: because they were free. They were free to develop a
Speaker 2: steam engine or as successors. But it's not the steam
Speaker 2: engine that made them great, and it's not the terrorists
Speaker 2: that made them great either.
Speaker 3: I want to let you round that we have Tony ready.
Speaker 3: He has just joined.
Speaker 2: Okay, great, let's bring Tony on. Thank you for joining us, Tony.
Speaker 2: And if everybody doesn't know Tony, you probably know him
Speaker 2: by now. Tony Ardeman of wise Wolf and he has
Speaker 2: set up David Knightie Gold that will take you to
Speaker 2: his website. Take you also to where you can find
Speaker 2: out about us and sign up for wolf Pack. Wolf
Speaker 2: Pack is something's very innovative that Tony did which allows
Speaker 2: you to buy gold or silver on a regular basis.
Speaker 2: You can set up your budget and you can sign
Speaker 2: up for a particular level. If you want fifty dollars
Speaker 2: we wanted one thousand dollars or whatever. You can set
Speaker 2: that up each month and you'll gradually accumulate this to
Speaker 2: average out your prices, rather than saving everything up and
Speaker 2: making one big purchase at one point because the price
Speaker 2: is fluctuating all the time. But that's a great way
Speaker 2: to start to accumulate gold and silver. Thank you for
Speaker 2: joining us, Tony.
Speaker 3: Great to be with you, David, good to see you.
Speaker 2: You know, we're looking at this. I want to get
Speaker 2: your take on this. You know, we saw gold go
Speaker 2: up about two point eight percent. I think the spot
Speaker 2: price went up yesterday. But a lot of people are saying, well,
Speaker 2: it went up because of the rumors, which apparently any
Speaker 2: but believe any of these rumors. The rumors are designed
Speaker 2: for insider trading. I don't think they're actually reflective anything
Speaker 2: that's actually real out there. But nevertheless, it does move
Speaker 2: the markets, and it certainly does. And the markets move
Speaker 2: and the price of gold moves. And what moved it,
Speaker 2: they said, was the fact that they thought that if
Speaker 2: there was going to be peace and that would be deflationary,
Speaker 2: and so that helped gold go up, which is kind
Speaker 2: of counterintuitive the way I look at it. I mean,
Speaker 2: what do you think in terms of you look at
Speaker 2: this stuff and you have to kind of make a
Speaker 2: guess as to what the short term movements of gold
Speaker 2: are going to be. Most of us who are investing
Speaker 2: in gold, we're looking at this for the long term.
Speaker 2: And yet if you look at this, you know, what
Speaker 2: do you think if they actually came up with some
Speaker 2: kind of a piece agreement and stopped all this stuff.
Speaker 2: What do you think and the price of oil starts
Speaker 2: to go down, the would happen with gold. I mean
Speaker 2: gold went up on the when oil went down, and
Speaker 2: vice versa. What do you think in terms of what
Speaker 2: we might be seeing with us how that might affect gold.
Speaker 5: Oil is down about eight dollars a barrel from yesterday
Speaker 5: when I checked, and that's a I think it's a
Speaker 5: natural flow back and forth.
Speaker 3: And where we are.
Speaker 5: We saw at the beginning of the war, gold went
Speaker 5: about fifty three hundred an ounce and then started to
Speaker 5: trend downward because, as we've discussed, large entities country central
Speaker 5: banks dumped a lot of their gold holdings to purchase oil,
Speaker 5: and a lot of these entities used their so gold functioned.
Speaker 5: It is money at that point, and they were able
Speaker 5: to use that liquidity in order to buy crude oil.
Speaker 5: I think this is going to be a yo yo
Speaker 5: back and forth. I don't think we're going to go
Speaker 5: back to like the days of fifty dollars a barrel
Speaker 5: oil anytime soon. I don't know that that's even on
Speaker 5: the horizon. As a matter of fact, I think this
Speaker 5: is a preparation for energy lockdowns to stifle growth and
Speaker 5: to stifle travel, and we've seen the airlines that have
Speaker 5: imploded because of this, and jet blues next on the
Speaker 5: chopping block after Spirit. I think it's just the balls
Speaker 5: just getting started to roll.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, and it's not just them. Luftanza had to
Speaker 2: cancel a thousand flights for the summer.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's just getting started. And the shock of this
Speaker 5: I don't even think is really set in. From when
Speaker 5: oil went to one hundred and twenty, a lot of
Speaker 5: that stuff is still not I was on a show yesterday.
Speaker 5: They asked, because I've been in the gasoline business since
Speaker 5: i was a little kid with my family, I understand
Speaker 5: a little bit about it. And I said, well, there's
Speaker 5: there's a lot of lag time between pricing and refinement
Speaker 5: that happens as well, so and there there's no certainty
Speaker 5: in this market. So I mean, you could have temporary
Speaker 5: gains and gold and temporary gains and oil, and they
Speaker 5: might go back and forth for a long time.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 5: But the trends are all all the fundamentals that you
Speaker 5: and I discussed, the trends that are all in there
Speaker 5: to show that the dollar is constantly being you know, reprinted, expanded,
Speaker 5: the money supply expands, which decreases the purchasing power, and
Speaker 5: that happens to all the.
Speaker 3: Currencies in the world right now.
Speaker 5: So yeah, yeah, in the long run, you know, I
Speaker 5: think I think the outlooks really good for medals and
Speaker 5: honestly for crude oil as well. Even with even if
Speaker 5: demand goes down with higher prices, I still think that
Speaker 5: the price of crude will be higher.
Speaker 2: You know. It's the kind of thing We've had a
Speaker 2: couple of these memes out there. Taco Trump always chickens out.
Speaker 2: They put that out there about the terraffs because of
Speaker 2: the volatility and the capriciousness about Trump in terms of terraffs.
Speaker 2: Then they came up with another one, Nacho not a
Speaker 2: chance to hor mooz opens and all that is there,
Speaker 2: I think to try to calm down the market, because
Speaker 2: they do react. Just as we saw this person who
Speaker 2: put in that nearly a billion dollar bet at three
Speaker 2: am in the morning, one hour before the story hit
Speaker 2: that Trump claimed that or somebody in the Trump administration
Speaker 2: claimed that there was going to be a one page
Speaker 2: memo of understanding to end all this nonsense with Iran,
Speaker 2: and that person made about one hundred and twenty five
Speaker 2: million dollars in that one hour, and so people are
Speaker 2: playing this and I think we're being played by the
Speaker 2: Trump administration. But you know, there's going to be this
Speaker 2: kind of volatility, this jumpiness. There are people who are
Speaker 2: manipulating other people with us, and they're reacting to things
Speaker 2: that Trump says as if there was any credibility to
Speaker 2: that at all. And that's just really moving around the
Speaker 2: price of oil, the price of gold, and all the
Speaker 2: rest of this stuff. And we look at the long
Speaker 2: term effects of this. And I don't know if you
Speaker 2: heard it or not, but I talked earlier this week
Speaker 2: there was an opportunity to reflect on Jeopardy, the game,
Speaker 2: the TV game, and they talked about some guy who
Speaker 2: just finished a run of thirty one or thirty two
Speaker 2: victories on Jeopardy and he made eight hundred and eighty
Speaker 2: thousand dollars I think it was. And how much did
Speaker 2: the very first winner make? She made three hundred and
Speaker 2: forty five dollars, and that was back in nineteen sixty four,
Speaker 2: and she said, yeah, there's a lot more purchasing power
Speaker 2: back then. I friend of mine and I went to
Speaker 2: a bunch of broadway shows and everything I thought they
Speaker 2: mentioned in it. They said, well, you know, that would
Speaker 2: be worth about three thousand something dollars today, And I thought, well,
Speaker 2: what would have happened if she instead of keeping the currency,
Speaker 2: what if she had taken at three hundred forty five
Speaker 2: dollars and bought gold at that point in time because
Speaker 2: it was fixed at thirty five dollars announce even the
Speaker 2: market price was like thirty five dollars and fifty cents
Speaker 2: an out, so it was still kind of a stable
Speaker 2: economy in nineteen sixty four. And it turns out that
Speaker 2: she would have had forty five thousand dollars worth of
Speaker 2: gold if she had taken that three hundred and forty
Speaker 2: five dollars in cash, Because that's the long term effect,
Speaker 2: and that's the way you got to look at this
Speaker 2: not get caught up in all of the of the
Speaker 2: rumors and reactions that are happening on Wall Street and
Speaker 2: how the people are deliberately trying to manipulate things. I mean,
Speaker 2: Trump and his regime is a good example of how
Speaker 2: the market is manipulated with rumors, isn't it.
Speaker 5: Well, at this point, is there any other trade but
Speaker 5: inside or trading.
Speaker 3: I mean, can you make.
Speaker 5: Money in this market without being a crook? I mean,
Speaker 5: is there any value in most anything that's traded anymore?
Speaker 5: And a lot of that is into the way this
Speaker 5: system works. And you and I both know there's still
Speaker 5: millions and millions of dollars that are unclaimed from shorting
Speaker 5: airline stocks right prior.
Speaker 3: To nine to eleven. Oh yeah, connected to Deutsche Bank.
Speaker 2: And no, the instigation of that, right, as they point out,
Speaker 2: they're not going to do an investigation if they caught somebody,
Speaker 2: the Department of Justice, and this is intarted trading about
Speaker 2: all the war news and everything. If they caught somebody,
Speaker 2: you know good andwill that the Trump Department of Justice
Speaker 2: is not going to prosecute them. And if by some
Speaker 2: chance some future administration decided they want to prosecute them,
Speaker 2: Trump will probably pardon the guilty parties in advance, so
Speaker 2: that won't happen. So yeah, why not do that, right,
Speaker 2: they can get away with it. It's just money, it's
Speaker 2: for you to take.
Speaker 5: We've turned He's turned this whole planet into a casino.
Speaker 5: And let's if you reverse engineer the price of gold
Speaker 5: right now. I mean, I think under normal conditions, it
Speaker 5: wouldn't be near this price. We would have not hit
Speaker 5: five thousand dollars an ounce gold in twenty twenty five
Speaker 5: without this presidency, it's not going to happen. And I mean,
Speaker 5: we go back to twenty twenty four, you know, gold
Speaker 5: hit twenty five hundred dollars. Now it's in August, I
Speaker 5: remember distinctly, and I've traced that price and everything that's
Speaker 5: happened since then, and it's all about the uncertainty. There
Speaker 5: is no direction, it's just chaos. And then the tariffs
Speaker 5: that that never happened. That paused that whole domino effect
Speaker 5: of all these bullion houses and banks overseas to start
Speaker 5: frantically repatriating, and that caused a cascade of failed contracts
Speaker 5: for all that physical bullion. So a lot of the market,
Speaker 5: the paper market, was exposed there. So this is only
Speaker 5: the beginning I think of the repricing of all commodities,
Speaker 5: not just gold and silver, but everything based in dollars.
Speaker 5: And and I think this is just we're reaching a
Speaker 5: point of no return where it's hard to even associate
Speaker 5: the dollar with the price anymore. Yeah, I don't I
Speaker 5: don't know, I don't know that we can do that, David,
Speaker 5: I don't know if we can go back to the
Speaker 5: Jeopardy winner. I mean a lot of people have on
Speaker 5: the math. You know, from nineteen sixty four. If you
Speaker 5: were getting minimum wage in nineteen sixty four and you
Speaker 5: were getting paid, you know, in silver quarters, you've got
Speaker 5: you know, sixty seventy dollars worth of purchasing power or
Speaker 5: more at that time with minimum wage. So that's that's
Speaker 5: the difference between earnings when you have a sound dollar,
Speaker 5: when you have something backed by gold or silver, and
Speaker 5: when you have a free floating currency, and you can
Speaker 5: get caught up in the numbers like, well the numbers
Speaker 5: are higher, I made more money. Well, you actually didn't
Speaker 5: because your the money's been devalued or your currency's been devalued.
Speaker 3: So I think this is.
Speaker 5: The fight between oil and gold, which isn't really a fight,
Speaker 5: but I think the restructuring and repricing it's going to
Speaker 5: go back and forth for a while now based off
Speaker 5: of everything that's happened with the closing of the straight.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and when you look at this, you know we're
Speaker 2: about I guess what, We're two and a half months
Speaker 2: into this thing now, and the ope coal embargo was
Speaker 2: five months long, and what happened with that was it
Speaker 2: quadrupled the price of oil and it never went back
Speaker 2: down again. And as you point out, this is what
Speaker 2: they're doing in terms of trying to push us into
Speaker 2: this controlled society. I talked to yesterday, I think it
Speaker 2: was Tony about somebody who was in New Zealand. And
Speaker 2: New Zealand has come up with a five tier rationing
Speaker 2: system based on your value to the people in government.
Speaker 2: And guess what the government is the number one. They're
Speaker 2: the top feeder. Okay, after them are big businesses, and
Speaker 2: then after them as infrastructure. Then small businesses come in
Speaker 2: at number four and the consumer is dead last. And
Speaker 2: this kind of rationing. The person looked at this and said,
Speaker 2: this is the same kind of contempt for small businesses
Speaker 2: and consumers and this merger of the elite. So the
Speaker 2: big corporations and government that we saw throughout COVID looks
Speaker 2: exactly like that. And they just keep coming back to
Speaker 2: the same thing again. They'll have different mcguffins, but it's
Speaker 2: always going back to the same thing. They want a
Speaker 2: permission society, they want total surveillance. That's why I like
Speaker 2: physical gold They want total surveillance, total tracking of everything,
Speaker 2: and to make all of us poor, so they keep
Speaker 2: all of the money. That's really what it is behind
Speaker 2: all of this stuff.
Speaker 5: You're right, and I think the rest of the planet
Speaker 5: is picking up a bit on this and the targeting
Speaker 5: of small business, the targeting of cash, the targeting of
Speaker 5: anything outside of the digital system. And for the first
Speaker 5: I mean I think for the first time in a
Speaker 5: long time, Canada just ran a trade surplus.
Speaker 3: You know why.
Speaker 5: It's because twenty four percent of the output was precious
Speaker 5: metals exports.
Speaker 2: They ran a trade.
Speaker 3: Surplus in a freak.
Speaker 5: And this is like the United States and Canada, I
Speaker 5: believe since NAFTA have run trade deficits, and so Canada
Speaker 5: picking up a trade surplus because of the exported precious metals.
Speaker 2: Matter of fact, so u Con Cornelius is getting into
Speaker 2: an export business.
Speaker 5: Then they're in the export well and the gold is
Speaker 5: going and a lot of places going eastward and looking
Speaker 5: places like India as a matter of fact, that the
Speaker 5: premiums because they're so bottlenecked from imports into India, premiums
Speaker 5: have skyrocket for physical because of customs and sorting through
Speaker 5: everything that's still waiting to be delivered. There's so much
Speaker 5: demand for physical gold and silver in India. It's literally
Speaker 5: like breaking the price, you know, associated we associate with
Speaker 5: the spot price and a little bit of premium here
Speaker 5: in the United States, but in India, it's off the charts.
Speaker 5: And they've repatriated seventy seven percent of their gold holding
Speaker 5: so far, and a lot of the countries are doing
Speaker 5: I mean countries all over the world are doing the
Speaker 5: same thing, the repatriating the physical and that's what you
Speaker 5: have to remember. It's the new structure is based off
Speaker 5: physical because of the lack of trust. Used to just
Speaker 5: trust the dollar, the dollars no longer trusted, was weaponized,
Speaker 5: and so they're literally building physical storage facilities across the
Speaker 5: world to trade in and out of gold. Yeah, Hong
Speaker 5: Kong's doing that. I've talked about that before. I think
Speaker 5: that's a major move of storage facilities just off the
Speaker 5: airport outside of Hong Kong for international trade, and that's
Speaker 5: what the trade's going to be conducted in dollars. And
Speaker 5: I think we're seeing that right now with the price
Speaker 5: of gold falling when the price of oil increases, because
Speaker 5: it's liquidity out out the door, and there's a lot
Speaker 5: of sell off and gold to buy a crude.
Speaker 3: I think this is this flock.
Speaker 5: But on the long enough timeline, I think, you know,
Speaker 5: the increase in gold is inevitable. I mean, I don't
Speaker 5: think it's going to eat into everything that gold does
Speaker 5: as far as price moves. But that's what's happening. Gold's
Speaker 5: functioning is money right now.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. And for those reasons, you see some
Speaker 2: of the banks as they're looking at the particular the
Speaker 2: price of gold. You've got Make of America is predicting
Speaker 2: six thousand by the end of the year. You got
Speaker 2: Morgan Stanley that is seeing fifty two hundred dollars gold
Speaker 2: by the end of the year. They have been in
Speaker 2: the past very conservative about what they had put in.
Speaker 2: So these are the people who are looking at long
Speaker 2: term trends that are predicting this kind of stuff, and
Speaker 2: their long term trends have historically been very conservative. But
Speaker 2: the bottom line is we as we point out every
Speaker 2: week and as other people in pointing out, all the
Speaker 2: fundamentals that drove gold up so much in the last
Speaker 2: couple of years are not only still there, but they're
Speaker 2: much stronger than they were before.
Speaker 5: That's exactly right, and they're only getting stronger. Yes, we
Speaker 5: have no certainty, and you have to ask yourself what
Speaker 5: is the plan here? Like a lot of people are
Speaker 5: applauding Trump for the supposed reopening of the Strait, Well
Speaker 5: you closed it in the first place. I mean, it's
Speaker 5: not an accomplishment. I mean, this is anybody that knew
Speaker 5: anything about geopolitics.
Speaker 3: And I've told this story on my show.
Speaker 5: I mean, my dad was talking to me about, you know,
Speaker 5: consequences of striking around in the nineties. I was a kid,
Speaker 5: you know, I was a teenager, and he was talking
Speaker 5: to me. He's like, well, they would close the straight
Speaker 5: up horor movies. I remember that, you know, in nineteen
Speaker 5: ninety seven, and I was thinking, well, this is what's
Speaker 5: always been understood that was going to happen if you
Speaker 5: make that sort of strike, and of course we did,
Speaker 5: that happened. So it seems to me that was already known.
Speaker 5: And if you wanted to, oil had been stagnant for
Speaker 5: so long, you know, in the fifty sixty dollars range,
Speaker 5: So don't I don't think we're going to get back
Speaker 5: to that level. I think this is it's been repriced,
Speaker 5: just like the opeken barb. And once you once there's
Speaker 5: a repricing, does it come down? I mean it's historically.
Speaker 5: Have we ever seen that where there's a return to
Speaker 5: you know, a cheap oil? I still don't see it
Speaker 5: right now.
Speaker 2: No. No, it was like three dollars a bare barrel,
Speaker 2: and then it went to four twelve dollars a barrel,
Speaker 2: a factor of four. And it just keeps going up
Speaker 2: from there, doesn't it. And and of course, as you
Speaker 2: point out, everybody knew that was going to happen with
Speaker 2: the straight up hooard moves, including the people who were
Speaker 2: in Trump's inner circle, but they didn't have the spine
Speaker 2: to stand up and say that to him, you know.
Speaker 2: And and when he pushed back a little bit, they
Speaker 2: just sat back down again and said, okay, right, you know,
Speaker 2: we'll let you do it, or you know, I'll let
Speaker 2: you do it. He's going to do it whatever he
Speaker 2: wants to do.
Speaker 5: And these are these are World Economic Forum sympathizing folks,
Speaker 5: you know, these are globalist people. And as I heard
Speaker 5: a report the other day, I thought was really interesting.
Speaker 5: You know, we haven't really dug into the fat new
Speaker 5: fed chair. We haven't really dug into wash. You know,
Speaker 5: it hasn't come out in the warsh yet. I know
Speaker 5: you made that do it. But it is interesting that
Speaker 5: you know, his his father is a major donor, like
Speaker 5: a billionaire donor. And then he's also had, I think
Speaker 5: allegedly been on the Epstein guests list. There's yeah, other
Speaker 5: stuff that's been associated with him.
Speaker 2: And well las Bessant. It's got Bessant with Soros's right
Speaker 2: hand man when they broke the Bank of England. And
Speaker 2: if it was a Democrat that had put in a
Speaker 2: sorrow Sky as Treasury secretary, I can imagine everybody would
Speaker 2: be having a fit. But when Trump does it, it's okay.
Speaker 2: You know, I'm sure this guy has seen the light
Speaker 2: and he's no longer like that at all. Right, And
Speaker 2: so of course this warsh guy, like I said, I
Speaker 2: haven't done a deep guy on his background. All I
Speaker 2: know about him is that his wife is coming from
Speaker 2: this STI Lauder makeup fortune. And I said, yeah, they're
Speaker 2: trying to put lipstick on the pig of the Federal reservis.
Speaker 2: I don't know this thing, but it's interesting.
Speaker 5: There's chaos inside the Federal Reserve now. And you know,
Speaker 5: Jerome Pallls decided not to leave. He's going to stay.
Speaker 5: He's got a seat there on the board, he's a
Speaker 5: Fed governor, and he's going to stay until I think
Speaker 5: August of twenty twenty eight. So he just saw not
Speaker 5: to leave entirely. So his vote counts. I guess if
Speaker 5: if you think that works like a democracy, but I
Speaker 5: mean that there's there's some dissent in there. It's not
Speaker 5: just all about there's some people that want rate hikes,
Speaker 5: there's people that want to stay where they are, and
Speaker 5: there's people like I think again that the policy of
Speaker 5: Trump is a weaker dollar. They need to have that
Speaker 5: big print. And so that's rate you know, not not
Speaker 5: just quantitative easing, as you've mentioned as a couple of
Speaker 5: days ago, you were talking about if they're already doing
Speaker 5: quantitative easing. They're already doing QE. Yeah, but they that
Speaker 5: is the is the lowering of interest rates, which is
Speaker 5: going to massively expand the money supply, and that's the
Speaker 5: goal of the Trump administration. It has been that. That's
Speaker 5: just a clear policy that they've made. You know, this
Speaker 5: is we want a weaker dollar.
Speaker 2: He's not going to do anything to try to stop
Speaker 2: the budget deficit. I mean again, the trade deficit is
Speaker 2: his obsession. You never hear him or Mike Johnson or
Speaker 2: any of these people talk about out the budget deficit.
Speaker 2: Only Thomas Massey talks about that, and he tries to
Speaker 2: draw as much attention to it as possible. The freshman
Speaker 2: congressman who came in, he handed them his lapel thing
Speaker 2: that counts up what the deficit is. But nobody else
Speaker 2: cares about that. And so Trump's concern is to make
Speaker 2: sure that he can just pay the interest on this thing.
Speaker 2: And that's why he wants the interest rates lowered, because
Speaker 2: it makes a huge difference to the budget of the
Speaker 2: federal government. If interest rates go up much, I mean,
Speaker 2: it's going to suck up all the money that the
Speaker 2: federal government has just to pay the interest on the debt.
Speaker 2: So he's obsessed with getting that down, but he's not
Speaker 2: going to make the fundamental changes that need to be
Speaker 2: made in neither is Congress.
Speaker 5: In nineteen sixty three, the debt to GDP ratio for
Speaker 5: the United States was thirty one percent. It's one hundred
Speaker 5: percent now and climbing it's been. We've had higher you know,
Speaker 5: world War two and except so a worldwide war and
Speaker 5: you had over on sent debt to GDP, but the
Speaker 5: debt of the US was like two hundred and sixty
Speaker 5: eight billion or something.
Speaker 3: It was quaint.
Speaker 5: I mean, this is the the numbers that we're dealing
Speaker 5: with now. And the fact that you know, this isn't
Speaker 5: going to be there's not going to be a post
Speaker 5: war boom. You know, this isn't like the end of
Speaker 5: World War two. There's not a new Breton Woods in
Speaker 5: our favor, and the lack of purchasing of treasuries and
Speaker 5: bonds and other things that prop up the dollar are
Speaker 5: on their way out. So the deficit, I know, Dick
Speaker 5: Cheney said deficits don't matter. They absolutely do, because it
Speaker 5: has to do with the strength of the dollar, or
Speaker 5: the trust factor in the dollar, the money velocity, how
Speaker 5: much is it used. That's the reason we have been
Speaker 5: able to float as long as we have. And this
Speaker 5: is what we've been doing. We haven't been gaining wealth,
Speaker 5: we've been floating. Anybody that knows anything about business, you know,
Speaker 5: especially I've been in the gasoline business and contracts and float,
Speaker 5: and you can float for a while and it makes
Speaker 5: it look like you have money, but you really don't.
Speaker 3: You know, you're lose.
Speaker 5: The more that you increase the deficit, the more you
Speaker 5: increase the money supply, the faster that you're going to
Speaker 5: go out of business, and that in the United States
Speaker 5: will continue to print its way out. So what does
Speaker 5: that mean, David. It means that commodities will be repriced
Speaker 5: based off the loss of purchasing power in the dollar.
Speaker 5: That's just inevitable. So you don't have to be It
Speaker 5: doesn't take special skills to figure out that, you know,
Speaker 5: two years from now, gold and silver are going to
Speaker 5: look better than they do today. This isn't nineteen eighty,
Speaker 5: that's right, there's no more room. The reason that they
Speaker 5: were able to bring down the prices of metals in
Speaker 5: nineteen eighty at eight hundred dollars an ounce for gold
Speaker 5: and fifty two dollars an ounce for silver is because
Speaker 5: there was still lots of room to manipulate the market.
Speaker 5: The debt was only about, you know, a little over
Speaker 5: a trillion dollars for the US at that time. Well,
Speaker 5: now we're at thirty seven thirty eight trillion.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think it's thirty nine. I looked at it
Speaker 2: and it's like the rate that it was going it
Speaker 2: supposed to be sometime in September. I think they're going
Speaker 2: to hit forty trillion unless Trump and hag Seth and
Speaker 2: these people can do things like boost the defense spending.
Speaker 2: The only thing they're complaining about is not the level
Speaker 2: of spending for defense. They're just complaining about the fact
Speaker 2: that the companies can't make the bombs fast enough that
Speaker 2: they're blowing up. This whole federal government is going to
Speaker 2: be hoisted by its own boitard blown up by its
Speaker 2: own bomb. When you look at I calculated what the
Speaker 2: Pentagon's budget if they get their one and a half
Speaker 2: trillion again. They hit a record budget of a trillion dollars,
Speaker 2: which is more than the next eight countries combined spent
Speaker 2: on defense quote unquote defense, although it's not defenses on offense,
Speaker 2: that's what we're using it for, but anyway, more than
Speaker 2: the next eight countries combined. As soon as they hit
Speaker 2: that record, oh, we need to increase that by another
Speaker 2: fifty percent. So what does it cost the average American household?
Speaker 2: I looked up the number of households in the US.
Speaker 2: It's over eleven thousand dollars per household that were paying
Speaker 2: just for the Pentagon nonsense, just to create wars, to
Speaker 2: kill people, to create instability, global instability, and you know,
Speaker 2: to put our own lives at risk really because we're
Speaker 2: creating a long list of enemies who would like to
Speaker 2: attack us, and they will find some way to do it.
Speaker 5: Yeah, we're just out there looking for a war. Yeah,
Speaker 5: and that's built into this budget. As matter of fact,
Speaker 5: the numbers you just quoted were true when it was
Speaker 5: seven hundred and fifty billion, and that that spending more
Speaker 5: than eight what is the next eight countries combined? Yeah,
Speaker 5: that was true, that we were going to double that. No,
Speaker 5: that's the severity and the damage that that does to
Speaker 5: our monetary system when you just continue to create more
Speaker 5: and more liabilities and then you create new and new
Speaker 5: new currency to cover those liabilities.
Speaker 3: That does that end?
Speaker 2: Well?
Speaker 5: I mean, in mathematics, doesn't path eventually catches up. I
Speaker 5: don't think math cares about your intent or your political
Speaker 5: philosophies or your ideology.
Speaker 3: Math just is and it will eventually catch up with you.
Speaker 2: And even if you're on a casino, it'll catch up
Speaker 2: with you, doesn't.
Speaker 5: Well, that's you know, the casino strategy always favors the house,
Speaker 5: you know.
Speaker 2: Except when this Trump's house. It's crazy, you know, speaking
Speaker 2: of his strategy and lack of it or whatever, lack
Speaker 2: of understanding. You know, I think people say, well, is
Speaker 2: this deliberate sabotage or is it just stupidity. There was
Speaker 2: one aspect of this I think argues for the stupidity
Speaker 2: side of it, when he starts pulling in troops from Germany.
Speaker 2: And look, I'm all for that. I don't want to
Speaker 2: see an American empire, but he does. He does want
Speaker 2: to see an American empire. And the troops in Germany
Speaker 2: are not there to protect Germany as much as they
Speaker 2: are to project American power throughout Europe, throughout the Middle
Speaker 2: East and other places like that. And so when he
Speaker 2: pulls the troops from Germany as a protest against Germany,
Speaker 2: what he's really doing is undermining his own dreams of empire.
Speaker 2: That's what I saying. None of this stuff makes any sense,
Speaker 2: even if you look at it from his perspective, it
Speaker 2: doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 5: I go back to his first administration and this which
Speaker 5: is completely different, and you know that, I mean we look,
Speaker 5: I mean there was even a semblance of we don't
Speaker 5: want this liberal New World Order a member, and he was.
Speaker 5: There was that story that I read on my show
Speaker 5: back in twenty nineteen where he was pulled into a
Speaker 5: like a side office with General Mattis and a few
Speaker 5: other of the Joint chiefs and other people that were
Speaker 5: trying to explain to him the rationality why we have
Speaker 5: troops in Germany and why we have tp you know,
Speaker 5: in the Pacific realm and all this that he was
Speaker 5: talking about bringing back like this, these treaties, aren't you know?
Speaker 5: This is something that he voiced. You know that NATO
Speaker 5: was obsolete and it costs him too much money. That
Speaker 5: are I Pengler fair share? We should bring people home.
Speaker 5: You don't really hear that much. This is a protest.
Speaker 5: I think it's personal, you know, with the Germans. But
Speaker 5: he's not He's not going to reallocate those troops to
Speaker 5: the United States. No, he's not going to protect our
Speaker 5: order or do something that would be for the national
Speaker 5: security of Americans. It's going to still protect the Empire.
Speaker 5: They'll be reallocated somewhere else, probably redirected, as you mentioned,
Speaker 5: to the Middle East, which is our focus always because
Speaker 5: of our of our friends there on Capitol Hill with Apac.
Speaker 2: Oh. Yeah, absolutely. I get a question here for you, Tony.
Speaker 2: This is from Hatchcar sixty one. Has Tony heard about
Speaker 2: two major silver refiners buying silver directly from miners? Seems
Speaker 2: there's a g lot of ninety percent silver. Wonder if
Speaker 2: this is why? What do you know about that?
Speaker 5: Have you heard about that there's a lot happening. I
Speaker 5: haven't heard those that direct story, but I know that
Speaker 5: there are some miners that are connecting with the refiners
Speaker 5: and being able to put out new physical bullion retail,
Speaker 5: so I do know that's happening. One of the unfortunate
Speaker 5: consequences of the price of silver going parabolic and going
Speaker 5: up to one hundred and twenty six dollars an ounce
Speaker 5: ninety days ago or a hundred twenty days ago, was
Speaker 5: the refiners got overwhelmed, and as a matter of fact,
Speaker 5: I had to hold on to sterling that I bought.
Speaker 5: Sterling silver was the last thing that I was still buying,
Speaker 5: even if I couldn't melt it. And finally I had
Speaker 5: to give up buying sterling for a little while buying
Speaker 5: it again because there was so few refiners that would
Speaker 5: even take silver at all. So I think they finally
Speaker 5: caught up and price stabilized a bit. There's going to
Speaker 5: be silver is back online as a monetary medal. As
Speaker 5: a matter of fact, this was just something I was
Speaker 5: talking about the other day. A lot of people because
Speaker 5: they tried to sell we're really frustrated with silver because
Speaker 5: they couldn't get close to spot quickly when the price
Speaker 5: hit over one hundred dollars an ounce. It's because everybody
Speaker 5: was trying to sell at once. I think a lot
Speaker 5: of those systems have been worked out, and so as
Speaker 5: silver continues to become more and more not just an
Speaker 5: industrial metal, not just something used for medical and other things,
Speaker 5: but as a monetary medal again, a lot of those
Speaker 5: refining outlets and wholesalers and other things, or I think
Speaker 5: a lot better equipped in the next year to two
Speaker 5: to deal with the influx of people using it to.
Speaker 3: Liquidate in and out of the market.
Speaker 2: And you're not seeing that with gold in terms because
Speaker 2: of all the industrial uses of silver, I guess you're
Speaker 2: not seeing that as much with gold. I mean, there
Speaker 2: are industrial uses of gold, but not as much as
Speaker 2: with silver. And a lot of people have looked at
Speaker 2: this and said, you know, there's that new design for
Speaker 2: a battery. I forget who did it, maybe it was
Speaker 2: Hyundai or something, but instead of using lithium, they had
Speaker 2: a design for silver, which had a lot of advantages
Speaker 2: over lithium in terms of not being as volatile for
Speaker 2: a fire. It had I think a lot faster charging
Speaker 2: rates and things like that, but of course it was
Speaker 2: a lot more expensive. But people said, if they start
Speaker 2: to move in this direction, that's going to be a
Speaker 2: massive use of silver. So you know, that's the other
Speaker 2: part of the equation I guess with silver.
Speaker 5: Yeah, silver is the most thermo conductive metal on Earth,
Speaker 5: and so it's used in solar and batteries and other
Speaker 5: things that will continue to I think be a mainstay
Speaker 5: for its industrial use. And the point I was trying
Speaker 5: to make with the gold or the golden versus silver
Speaker 5: on refining is because gold has been a monetarary contract
Speaker 5: a lot of times, when I'd sell to a refiner,
Speaker 5: that gold has been pre sold, so I had to
Speaker 5: sell to the refiner. It's been pre sold. It's going
Speaker 5: to go up the chain to probably a central bank
Speaker 5: or a large buyer, and those contracts will get snatched
Speaker 5: up because that's what central banks do. I see a
Speaker 5: movement in the future where they're also using silver. We
Speaker 5: noted in the last few years and Russia put silver
Speaker 5: as a strategic reserve asset. India added it as an
Speaker 5: asset where you could borrow against it for home loans
Speaker 5: and other things, and business loans. China stockpiling silver. I
Speaker 5: think in the next two to three years we're going
Speaker 5: to see silver used alongside gold as a storage of
Speaker 5: monetary use. So I think they'll be added to the
Speaker 5: balance sheets not only multinationals, but also countries, and that
Speaker 5: will change the nature of how silver is.
Speaker 3: You know, spot and sold.
Speaker 5: So we weren't ready for the prices that hit in
Speaker 5: the last you know, six months, just the system wasn't ready.
Speaker 5: But I do believe with between miners getting with the
Speaker 5: refiners and whostsalers and trying to get you know, physical
Speaker 5: product made, I think it will really increase the ability
Speaker 5: for you know folks, everyday folks to get in and
Speaker 5: out of that market easy.
Speaker 2: Well that's great. Yeah, you weathered the storm that came
Speaker 2: through here and now now we're kind of in I
Speaker 2: guess the eye of the storm. I think there's another
Speaker 2: way that's going to be hitting us in the future.
Speaker 2: Maybe not in the like you point out, maybe people
Speaker 2: have learned some things that might help to mitigate that.
Speaker 2: But I think it's going to pick back up again.
Speaker 2: I think that everything that Trump is doing is really
Speaker 2: hurting us economically. It's we can all see it and
Speaker 2: what has happened to our lifestyle and so but I
Speaker 2: think it's going to pick up again. And I think
Speaker 2: it's a good hedge that we all need to have
Speaker 2: as individuals. What is happening at wisewealth that you can
Speaker 2: tell us.
Speaker 5: About, Well, you know, that's we're still recovering from all that.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's.
Speaker 5: Funny because yesterday I had my crew, my eighties here
Speaker 5: in Branson.
Speaker 3: I said let's go through.
Speaker 5: We had stuff in the cabinets and a lot of
Speaker 5: that stuff I paid over one hundred dollars for. There
Speaker 5: was things that I said, let's just let's just liquid
Speaker 5: you know, liquidate all that we can. And we went
Speaker 5: through a lot of stuff that I can't put into
Speaker 5: a wolf pack. And it was an all day project yesterday.
Speaker 5: But I just got rid of that stuff and I said,
Speaker 5: let's put this on the balance sheets because we need
Speaker 5: to be able to buy more product, and I was
Speaker 5: able to pass on yesterday. If you're a wolf Pack member,
Speaker 5: you get silver dollars or something that we've been putting
Speaker 5: in most of all of the packages, like so the
Speaker 5: stuff that was made prior to nineteen thirty five, so
Speaker 5: Morgan dollars and piece dollars, a lot of them are collectibles.
Speaker 5: We passed those collectibles on people because we don't have
Speaker 5: time to sort through them. So a lot of times
Speaker 5: you get way more than the silver value. So just
Speaker 5: looking for little things like that, we know that there's
Speaker 5: even with the prices and things that calm down. I'm
Speaker 5: always vigilant on actually getting supply. I think that it's
Speaker 5: so volatile, David. I mean it's yeah right now. I
Speaker 5: mean you can get stuff, but it's never really fully
Speaker 5: recovered from twenty twenty. This isn't the same world when
Speaker 5: I started my business. It's not the same sort of
Speaker 5: supply chain. So I'm always looking at creative ways.
Speaker 2: To do that.
Speaker 3: And you know, it's.
Speaker 5: Surviving the price fluctuations, and I'm glad that we did.
Speaker 5: I don't it's not over.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's not over. It's the eye of storm.
Speaker 3: That's right, You're exactly right. We're in the eye of
Speaker 3: the storm.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And so just to clarify when you're talking about
Speaker 2: that putting in some of those older coins, you're putting
Speaker 2: in those coins at the valuing them at their weight
Speaker 2: in terms of their value as just the weight of silver,
Speaker 2: not putting in a premium for the numismatic stuff. So
Speaker 2: that's what you're talking about. People might that's actually right, Yeah,
Speaker 2: might actually get more from that. Well, that's great. I
Speaker 2: love what you do, and especially the wolf pack thing
Speaker 2: is very unique. And again, people can buy in any
Speaker 2: quantity they can, they can put in a large order,
Speaker 2: they can set things up for their i RA and
Speaker 2: you work with companies in terms of people UH using
Speaker 2: setting this up as an IRA. You don't actually manage
Speaker 2: the storage, but you work with companies that do. And
Speaker 2: so people can set up a metal, gold and silver
Speaker 2: i RA and that's always a very useful thing to
Speaker 2: do as well.
Speaker 3: So always always physical too. We don't deal in paper.
Speaker 5: None of what my business UH conducts is done in paper.
Speaker 3: It's all physical metals.
Speaker 5: And I think that's the i ras are I think
Speaker 5: a great way to hedge against having your savings in
Speaker 5: the market, like we talked about earlier in the in
Speaker 5: the in the show, just the inside of trading. Do
Speaker 5: you trust these people? Like what is the value pations
Speaker 5: of these companies anymore? I mean, was it even based
Speaker 5: off Is it based off profit? Is it based off earnings?
Speaker 5: I don't know, but you know there's going to be
Speaker 5: the manipulation in the paper and the standard market, I think.
Speaker 2: And to clarify what you're talking about, you're really talking
Speaker 2: about when we say paper gold and paper silver, we're
Speaker 2: talking about ets and things that you can trade on
Speaker 2: Wall Street like GLD and SLV that type of thing
Speaker 2: that's we're talking about. With paper you do have and
Speaker 2: I think they're great. The silver and gold certificates. I
Speaker 2: like that a lot. It's part of the wolfpack that
Speaker 2: that goes out from time to time.
Speaker 3: Where it's the gold back is a great.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's good. And that's not paper, that's actual physical
Speaker 2: gold and physical silver that is woven into this thing
Speaker 2: that looks like a like a paper note that is there.
Speaker 2: So yeah, it's great to have that option for people.
Speaker 2: And it's one of the few things that we can
Speaker 2: do to prepare against these types of things. That we
Speaker 2: see happening out there. Your program's coming up right after
Speaker 2: this one today, is that correct, sir?
Speaker 5: The Arderburn Radio transmission will be live here you're at
Speaker 5: eleven am Central Time, and you can find me over
Speaker 5: on Rumble on the America Unplug channel or on my
Speaker 5: ex account at Tony Rderburn.
Speaker 2: That's great.
Speaker 3: Well, that's great.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and we had you were traveling last week and
Speaker 2: you had the show goes on even when you're traveling.
Speaker 2: You had a guest host and thanks thanks to Jason Barker.
Speaker 2: Ya really, I didn't.
Speaker 5: This was one of my goals this year, is I
Speaker 5: need did not have a show that's the best of
Speaker 5: you know, it's only one show. I used to do
Speaker 5: five shows a week, but I can't anymore. It's just
Speaker 5: too much. So the Thursday I always look forward to it.
Speaker 5: And Jason and Ashley did a great job showing up
Speaker 5: and helping me keep that stream live.
Speaker 3: So thanks to them.
Speaker 2: That's great. That's great. Well again, everybody can catch a
Speaker 2: Tony show right after this one ends. And thank you
Speaker 2: so much for joining us, Tony. Thank you for what
Speaker 2: you do, thank you for supporting the program. We really
Speaker 2: do appreciate it. You have been a key supporter for
Speaker 2: this program.
Speaker 3: Real quickly before we go ap rumble seat, just drop
Speaker 3: to comment and said, does Tony also have a blog
Speaker 3: to help educate people on his site? Working on it.
Speaker 5: We've got a new the website for wolf Pack is
Speaker 5: being redesigned and continually to make updates on that and
Speaker 5: the podcast. I'm going to bring back the Wise Wolf
Speaker 5: Gold and Crypto show that is coming soon within the
Speaker 5: next month or two, and we'll have that and along
Speaker 5: with some blog posts and other things that we'll talk
Speaker 5: about some fundament really talk about just gold, silver content
Speaker 5: and the education part. I'm going to start doing that again.
Speaker 5: That's great, that's great. Well, thank you so much, Tony.
Speaker 5: I appreciate you coming on and always very interesting to
Speaker 5: talk to you. Always have a wealth of information and
Speaker 5: a way for people to build their wealth as well.
Speaker 5: Thank you so much, Tony Ardeban at Wise Wolf Gold
Speaker 5: and of course you can get there through David Knight
Speaker 5: Night Gold. We'll be right back folks.
Speaker 1: Making sense comment again, you're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 10: Elvis, the Beatle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown.
Speaker 9: Find them on the Oldies Channel at Apsradio.
Speaker 10: Dot Com.
Speaker 2: Well, you got a comment here from North American House Hippo.
Speaker 2: Did you want to read that, Travis? You want me to?
Speaker 1: Sure?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 3: North Breaking House Hippo says when I was nineteen and
Speaker 3: nineteen eighty nine, I got a job with a stockbroker.
Speaker 3: A broker in my office was interviewed on the news
Speaker 3: and told retail investors to get out now why they
Speaker 3: still can? He was fired the next morning.
Speaker 2: That's right. It's about what's profitable for them, not necessarily
Speaker 2: for you. I like the comment about brokers. I think
Speaker 2: it's actually from Woody Allen. Have to give him credit
Speaker 2: for that. He said they call him brokers because after
Speaker 2: you do business with him, you're a broker than you
Speaker 2: were before.
Speaker 3: There's this bit from The Simpsons where I believe it's
Speaker 3: I don't watch the Simpsons. I've seen like maybe a
Speaker 3: grand total of four episodes, so you'll have to bear
Speaker 3: with me. But Bart has some money. He takes it
Speaker 3: into the bank, and you know, it's like, oh, well,
Speaker 3: let's invest it and we do a little thing. Here,
Speaker 3: we do it, and it's gone.
Speaker 2: It's seeing that Cliff as well, Yeah, what do you mean?
Speaker 2: And it's gone? That's right. That's why it works well.
Speaker 2: It's also when we look at food. There was this
Speaker 2: interesting headline from market Watch. They said, the food inflation
Speaker 2: crisis will soon be the only thing that investors are
Speaker 2: talking about. And when we stop and think about this again,
Speaker 2: when we look at the massive effects of the stupidity
Speaker 2: that Trump is involved in and how it affects so
Speaker 2: many different things. It's not just the value added tax
Speaker 2: and the stacking up of the cost of fuel. That's
Speaker 2: bad enough, but it's the direct costs and things like
Speaker 2: fertilizer and stuff like that that's being shut down. And
Speaker 2: I saw this little AI clip that somebody put together
Speaker 2: Consumer's reaction to Donald Trump, which I thought was really
Speaker 2: appropriate in terms of what's going to be happening with food, inflection,
Speaker 2: a lot of other things.
Speaker 4: Son, see how this man is making us great again?
Speaker 2: Is there in a gold suit? By ninety nine a gallon?
Speaker 1: Are we great yet? Take that?
Speaker 2: How about for greatness?
Speaker 4: Five hundred dollars for medications? Are we great again?
Speaker 9: Farms of disaster total failure, sad, But with me in charge,
Speaker 9: we'll make American dirt great again.
Speaker 10: Just get out of the way.
Speaker 2: That's a shame.
Speaker 3: You have to sell your farm.
Speaker 4: Remember I've always had your back one hundred percent.
Speaker 2: Brob, what are you gonna do about high fuel prices?
Speaker 2: We're working on it.
Speaker 10: And this is what I think of your make America
Speaker 10: great again.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he's got our back, doesn't he? And he's stabbing
Speaker 2: it repeatedly. I've been shived in the back by this
Speaker 2: guy so many times you don't even feel it anymore.
Speaker 2: I guess when it happens.
Speaker 3: But also I was informed that apparently it's not a
Speaker 3: Simpsons clip, it's a South Park clip, which is another
Speaker 3: show I haven't watched. So yeah, they're easy for me
Speaker 3: to forget which one when I don't know either.
Speaker 2: It goes into that part of the brain that stores
Speaker 2: information about shows that you don't watch.
Speaker 3: Sorry, my brain is totally filled up with Pokemon facts.
Speaker 3: I don't have room for South Park or the Simpsons.
Speaker 2: Well here is a heads up for people, just so
Speaker 2: that you know, you know, they don't want food grown,
Speaker 2: and if it's going to be grown, they got to
Speaker 2: get it with a glifast and all the rest of
Speaker 2: the stuff. And of course it's big agricultural interests that
Speaker 2: are pushing your publican party and Trump to give legal
Speaker 2: immunity to Monsanto for the cancer that they're causing with
Speaker 2: gwifast has been proven over and over again in court.
Speaker 2: So their response says, well, we're going to give them.
Speaker 2: We're going to give them legal immunity because it doesn't
Speaker 2: matter to them if the food is poisonous. You know,
Speaker 2: they want to sell you that soilent green because that
Speaker 2: gives them the green stuff the cash. Right, all they
Speaker 2: care about is output. They don't care about quality or
Speaker 2: safety with any of this stuff. And so along those lines,
Speaker 2: just put in the heads up here. I think this
Speaker 2: guy is a butcher and he's at Costco because people
Speaker 2: have told him that Costco is selling lab meat. Here's
Speaker 2: how they label it.
Speaker 11: By the way, customers come in here telling me how
Speaker 11: cheap the prices are right now at Costco.
Speaker 1: A meets.
Speaker 11: I decided to go to Costco myself, and I wanted
Speaker 11: to take a look at what was going on. When
Speaker 11: I went in there, walked across the meat the Palman rimsteaks.
Speaker 10: What eight dollars a pound?
Speaker 11: That's less than I pay just serve my customs. I
Speaker 11: looked at the label closely. It says sell cultivated. I
Speaker 11: had zero idea what the hell that meant got in
Speaker 11: the car when I left Costco and looked it up.
Speaker 11: Cell cultivated means leb grown. They are selling leb grown
Speaker 11: meat at Costco. Now look at the labels, guys, know
Speaker 11: what you're feeding your family Because I wouldn't feed that.
Speaker 1: Meat to my door.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he wouldn't feed it to his dog. But they
Speaker 2: want you to eat it that way. And one of
Speaker 2: the ways they do that is to put the regular
Speaker 2: farmers out of business. Again, Big Egg doesn't care what
Speaker 2: they load up with glyfast and the World Economic Forum
Speaker 2: wants you buying the kind of lab meat that Bill
Speaker 2: Gates and these other people want. One way to do
Speaker 2: it is to make real food so expensive that you
Speaker 2: can't afford it. I meanwhile, you got the Republicans are
Speaker 2: proposing a billion dollars of taxpayer dollars in order to
Speaker 2: build Trump's ballroom, his ballroom bunker. Again, when I look
Speaker 2: at this and a session with monuments to himself, his
Speaker 2: obsession with this ballroom, and of course it's not just
Speaker 2: the ego aspect of it. I mean, he's looking at
Speaker 2: something that is a bunker for him because of what
Speaker 2: he's doing. The apocalypse that they're pushing as well. And
Speaker 2: so they've always portrayed this as a gift to the
Speaker 2: American people that's going to be paid for by private donors.
Speaker 2: But we all know how that works out, don't we.
Speaker 2: You know, we got these private donors that they seem
Speaker 2: to want something in exchange for that. It seems like
Speaker 2: that's always the case. He said, no way, it's going
Speaker 2: to be government funds, he told people in the last November.
Speaker 2: He said, they're all private individuals that put up a
Speaker 2: lot of money to build a ballroom. Not one penny
Speaker 2: is being used from the federal government. Well, of course
Speaker 2: he banned pennies, but that's beside the point. But the gleaming,
Speaker 2: ninety thousand square foot square room that he's building, he's
Speaker 2: building may ultimately put taxpayers on the hook for a
Speaker 2: billion dollars. Why again, because of security enhancements that are
Speaker 2: tied to this project. So when we look at what
Speaker 2: they want to do with this stuff, we have to pay.
Speaker 2: As they go to war with the world, as they
Speaker 2: make enemies of everyone, as everyone wants to not just
Speaker 2: kill the president of people who are making these policies,
Speaker 2: but they want to kill every American based on this
Speaker 2: In Mexico. There is a bar down there making headlines
Speaker 2: because while they charge most people cover charge of like
Speaker 2: twenty five dollars to get in, if you are American,
Speaker 2: the charge is three hundred dollars. What Trump has done,
Speaker 2: he's got Canadians hating and booing American teams he is building.
Speaker 2: He's the uglio American that is getting everyone to hate us. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: they say, well, because of this assassination attempt, we've got
Speaker 2: to have the bunker. And yet the reality is is
Speaker 2: people pointed out you had Fox and I played the clip.
Speaker 2: There was some Fox News guys that were caught on
Speaker 2: a hot mic talking about how pathetic the security was. Yeah,
Speaker 2: he's just gonna hold the door open for people. Now,
Speaker 2: there's a video clip out there. I'm not going to
Speaker 2: play for you because it's all just visual. We have
Speaker 2: a lot of people who listen to this as a podcast.
Speaker 2: But you got three women who are there, they're part
Speaker 2: of TSA and they're standing up against the wall when
Speaker 2: this guy's running and shooting at somebody, and they all
Speaker 2: bug out and run and everybody saying, look, they've got security.
Speaker 2: It's just some middle aged women that are standing around.
Speaker 2: But they don't even have guns. I mean, there's not
Speaker 2: any point at them running at the attacker if they
Speaker 2: don't even have any guns. But again, when you look
Speaker 2: at this, it wasn't an issue if they have that
Speaker 2: kind of security even to get into a secure facility,
Speaker 2: that's not going to make them secure. So all this
Speaker 2: stuff is just a headfake, as we typically see from
Speaker 2: the Trump administration. They said. The structure, however, is vital
Speaker 2: for the president and for White House security. More than
Speaker 2: a ballroom. The project features underground medical facilities and a
Speaker 2: bomb shelter. Because that's the price of empire that we pay.
Speaker 2: We make enemies of everyone, even people who were our allies,
Speaker 2: were making enemies of them. I've had no briefing that
Speaker 2: gives me any insight into what could possibly cost a
Speaker 2: billion extra dollars, said one Democrat Coons. And I remember
Speaker 2: this started out as three hundred million, and it's going
Speaker 2: to be privately run. Now it's going to be three
Speaker 2: times that, more than three times going to be a
Speaker 2: billion dollars, and it's going to be paid for by
Speaker 2: you and I. That's kind of the way these things go,
Speaker 2: isn't it. Trump acted without congressional approval. They say people
Speaker 2: who are suing him, Well, you could say that pretty
Speaker 2: much about everything that he does. He doesn't get congressional approval.
Speaker 2: He doesn't get he doesn't have constitutional authority, and that
Speaker 2: applies to pretty much everything this guy continues to do.
Speaker 2: We're going to take a quick break and we come back.
Speaker 2: We're going to take a little bit of a look
Speaker 2: at Ted Turner. We got a lot of people talking
Speaker 2: about Ted Turner. I'm going to take a look at
Speaker 2: Ted Turner and his worldview. I got a little section
Speaker 2: here about Ted and Jesus real quickly.
Speaker 3: Though, we have a comment from DG eight. So is
Speaker 3: David that ballroom will be paid the same way the
Speaker 3: wall that never happened was Remember Mexico will pay for
Speaker 3: the wall, David. I'm blown away by the lack of
Speaker 3: discernment when it comes to MAGA.
Speaker 2: That's right. Well, maybe they can get Steve Bannon to
Speaker 2: set up a private you know, some Chinese billionaires. He
Speaker 2: doesn't want to go to jail again. I mean, you know,
Speaker 2: Trump already bailed him out once because Steve Bannon set
Speaker 2: up this we build a wall thing and defrauded his
Speaker 2: own supporters, just like Trump. That's what maga does I
Speaker 2: mean we're talking about Steve Bannon, We're talking about Alex
Speaker 2: Jones and Donald Trump. They're all out there ripping off
Speaker 2: their supporters, telling them they're going to do one thing,
Speaker 2: and then leading them into a trap. We'll be right back.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 9: Whether you're feeling like the Booze or Bluegrass ATS radio
Speaker 9: as you covered, check out a wide variety of channels
Speaker 9: on our app at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 2: Well, Ted Turner has gone to meet Jesus. Let's take
Speaker 2: a look at some of the things that he said
Speaker 2: about Jesus before he went to meet him. And of
Speaker 2: course when you look at you know, Jane Fonda made
Speaker 2: a statement about she was married to him for a while.
Speaker 2: She said he was my favorite ex husband. I cat,
Speaker 2: you've had a lot of them. I wonder who the
Speaker 2: favorite ex wife of Donald Trump is, including the current wife.
Speaker 2: Which one does he like the best?
Speaker 3: Probably the one that's passed.
Speaker 2: Away, Yeah, the one that gave him the taxi action
Speaker 2: when he buried her on this golf course. That's so
Speaker 2: fond of her for that, the gift that just keeps
Speaker 2: on giving. I guess, but I think.
Speaker 3: Of every year on April fifteenth.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. He had some interesting quotes about Christ
Speaker 2: and Christianity. He was supposedly raised in a devout Christian household,
Speaker 2: he said, but he turned on God. He's angry with
Speaker 2: God because when he was twenty years old, his younger
Speaker 2: sister died from a painful illness despite his prayers. So,
Speaker 2: you know, what's the matter with you? You're well, you
Speaker 2: know the answer that is. I guess the lesson they
Speaker 2: didn't learn in his Christian household is that God is
Speaker 2: God and you are not, and we don't get to
Speaker 2: make those decisions about things. And we also need to
Speaker 2: understand there's a reason why there is suffering and death
Speaker 2: in the world. It's because of our rebellion to God.
Speaker 2: And so when something like that happens, we need to
Speaker 2: put that in a proper context. We need to understand
Speaker 2: where we stand in rebellion to God, each and every
Speaker 2: one of us, and the mercy that He has shown
Speaker 2: us when we are still alive. But I've heard this
Speaker 2: story many many times. Somebody's angry because of a loved
Speaker 2: one that died, angry because they didn't get what they
Speaker 2: demanded from God. You don't get to demands on God.
Speaker 2: He is God and you are not. Nevertheless, he carried
Speaker 2: that grudge for quite some time. He later became an
Speaker 2: outspoken critic of organized Christianity. So I apologize for some
Speaker 2: of the statements that he made and retracted some of
Speaker 2: his hardest statements. One of those that he later retracted
Speaker 2: was when he famously said Christianity is a religion for losers. Well,
Speaker 2: actually I agree with him on that. I think it's
Speaker 2: a religion for people who want to lose condemnation and
Speaker 2: punishment and they want to lose the fact that they
Speaker 2: are enslaved to this sin that they serve. Yeah, you
Speaker 2: want to lose all of that, You want to lose
Speaker 2: the penalty of death that comes from our rebellion to God. Well,
Speaker 2: that really is as a lot of things that you
Speaker 2: can lose as being a Christian. Also lose your life
Speaker 2: so that you can gain eternal life, you can lose
Speaker 2: your life. And this in terms of you know, this
Speaker 2: is going back to what Tallarika and the mainstream media
Speaker 2: doesn't understand about what this pastors said about him. They
Speaker 2: said he needs to be crucified with Christ, and that's
Speaker 2: a metaphorical thing, saying that you're going to give up
Speaker 2: your priorities in your life because you want a closer
Speaker 2: relationship with Christ. It doesn't earn anything with God. It
Speaker 2: is simply mercy that we get from God. But that
Speaker 2: does give you a closer walk with God, and there
Speaker 2: are rewards in this life in the next, or that
Speaker 2: type of thing. Anyway, he goes on, he has this
Speaker 2: to say about the crucifixion. He said, Jesus Christ would
Speaker 2: have been considered just another long haired hippie freak if
Speaker 2: he had not been crucified. We talk about anachronisms. I
Speaker 2: guess they have hippies two thousand years ago, Travis. Not
Speaker 2: to my knowledge, I don't think, but.
Speaker 3: I haven't done an in depth study of hippie history,
Speaker 3: but I'm fairly certain they didn't.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he says, the folks weren't impressed with him healing
Speaker 2: the sick, feeding the multitudes bread, and or anything else
Speaker 2: like that, except maybe walking on water. But when he
Speaker 2: got crucified, that gave him his big start. Well there
Speaker 2: you go. Now that's kind of interesting because.
Speaker 3: It appears we have lost connection. Our internet seems to
Speaker 3: be down. I'm gonna go see if I can diagnose it. Okay,
Speaker 3: so we're not on air, I don't think so, but
Speaker 3: I mean, maybe carry on as if we are, because
Speaker 3: I'll see if I can get us back up and running.
Speaker 2: Okay, Well, let me just play a little bit of
Speaker 2: music here just in case, because I'm not sure if we're.
Speaker 1: On Defending the American Dream. You're listening to the David
Speaker 1: Knight Show.
Speaker 3: Welcome back, folks. We had a technical issue, but we
Speaker 3: are back up and running.
Speaker 2: Okay. Great, And we won't go into what we think
Speaker 2: it might have been, but that's not important. The key
Speaker 2: thing is that we're back. I was just talking about
Speaker 2: the inherent contradictions of Ted Turner because a lot of
Speaker 2: people have these type of contradictions. It's not just people
Speaker 2: who are billionaires and narcissists that have this kind of
Speaker 2: as that's there. But I thought it was very interesting
Speaker 2: when he talks about his comments, Well, he did all
Speaker 2: these miracles, you know, he fed people, he heal people,
Speaker 2: he walked on water and all this kind of stuff,
Speaker 2: but it really didn't do anything for him until he
Speaker 2: got crucified. That's when he got his big start. He said, well,
Speaker 2: it wasn't the crucive, it was the resurrection after the crucifixion.
Speaker 2: That was his big start, and that's the big start
Speaker 2: for all of us. Yeah, we all have a death
Speaker 2: awaiting us, as Ted Turner did as well. It is
Speaker 2: that hope of resurrection. That is the big start that
Speaker 2: we all hope in, and that is what our hope
Speaker 2: is in, and we have a confident expectation of that.
Speaker 2: And so there's all these inherent contradictions. Yeah, real miracles,
Speaker 2: but that didn't do it for people. And yet he
Speaker 2: comes back and he says, you know, I don't like
Speaker 2: what I see Christians doing. And we've heard this over
Speaker 2: and over again. We've heard this from Gandhi for example,
Speaker 2: I really like Jesus, but I don't like you Christians
Speaker 2: that are out there. I don't like the way you
Speaker 2: live your life. And it's like, yeah, that's right, just
Speaker 2: like Ted Turner, just like Mahatma, Gandhi, Christians have their
Speaker 2: problems because they're human and we don't follow the We
Speaker 2: don't follow Christ precisely and exactly in the way that
Speaker 2: we should. He's complaining about a lot of the TV evangelists.
Speaker 2: I think he said Jesus probably would be sick at
Speaker 2: his stomach if he could see the way his teachings
Speaker 2: are twisted by today's preachers. We again saying, see that
Speaker 2: Ted exactly. The presumption there is that you know he
Speaker 2: died the Crucifixion, that he's completely lost the resurrection, understanding
Speaker 2: that is there, he is alive and he sees what
Speaker 2: is happening there And again seeing a Sand employees with
Speaker 2: ashes on their foreheads on Ash Wednesday, he made a
Speaker 2: comment to them, what are you a bunch of Jesus freaks?
Speaker 2: You need to be working for Fox. I don't know
Speaker 2: they got Jesus freaks that Fox are not. Anyway, he
Speaker 2: blamed Christianity in part for the over population issues, saying
Speaker 2: that it posits that people are more important than sea
Speaker 2: otters and elephants. Well, Ted, they are because we're creating
Speaker 2: the image of God. This, I think is the key
Speaker 2: issue with with Ted. He worshiped the earth, he worshiped
Speaker 2: the environment. He worshiped guy. You know he had that
Speaker 2: Captain Planet thing that he did that was on his
Speaker 2: TV networks to teach kids to worship the environment. I
Speaker 2: don't know who you got that from. Maybe got it
Speaker 2: from Jane Fonda, I don't know. But he could never
Speaker 2: understand the difference between worship and stewardship. This is where
Speaker 2: the environmentalists get it wrong. We're not called to worship
Speaker 2: the earth. We're called to take care of it. Why
Speaker 2: because we're creating the image of God and He has
Speaker 2: put us in charge of this as a steward.
Speaker 3: And this is one area where I do find a
Speaker 3: lot of fault with libertarians. They will just look you
Speaker 3: dead in the eye and tell you, well, if you
Speaker 3: know they can afford to buy all the property on
Speaker 3: earth and they want to bulldoze it and destroy everything
Speaker 3: and put down every animal, I suppose it's their right.
Speaker 3: And just like, no, it is not just because you
Speaker 3: own you have a piece of paper that says you
Speaker 3: own this land, does not actually mean you're free to
Speaker 3: do whatever you want with it if you're expected to
Speaker 3: take care of it.
Speaker 2: If if you divorce the respect for individual liberty, if
Speaker 2: you divorce that from God, you have basically divorced it
Speaker 2: from the rationale for why we should have that. Again,
Speaker 2: the founder's got that right. We have individual liberty because
Speaker 2: we're created in the image of God, and everybody deserves
Speaker 2: to have those types of protections that they put in
Speaker 2: the Bill Rights because we are creating the image of God.
Speaker 2: If you get rid of God, you move God out
Speaker 2: of the equation. You have no basis for doing any
Speaker 2: of this. And I think that may be one of
Speaker 2: the reasons why John Adams said, you know, we cannot
Speaker 2: have this form of government if we have an immoral people.
Speaker 2: If you reject God, you reject the fundamental argument for
Speaker 2: America that we are created by God, that we are
Speaker 2: endowed by our creator with inalienable rights. That's the fundamental idea.
Speaker 2: He was asked about the meaning of life as part
Speaker 2: of a book. He was asked to contribute to that
Speaker 2: as a nineteen ninety one book called The Meaning of
Speaker 2: Life Reflections and Words and Pictures on Why We're Here.
Speaker 2: He rejected passive reliance on religion or an afterlife and
Speaker 2: emphasized action in the present world. Yeah, he was somebody
Speaker 2: who was purely secular. You know, we stop and think
Speaker 2: about it. Where does that word come from? Same root
Speaker 2: as the word second right in terms of a very
Speaker 2: short period of time, And if you have rejected the
Speaker 2: understanding of what we truly are the afterlife, and you
Speaker 2: are living just for this one second, then you are
Speaker 2: secular rather than eternal in your perspective, and he certainly
Speaker 2: was living for the moment. So he said, you need
Speaker 2: to get off your knees. You need to roll up
Speaker 2: your sleeves and save yourself. You criticize traditional religion for
Speaker 2: focusing on commandments that are engraved in stone, but that
Speaker 2: didn't address creating paradise. Now he would like Lostein's church.
Speaker 2: I guess right, your best life now. Anyway, he proposed
Speaker 2: his own ten voluntary initiatives instead of commandments, non religious
Speaker 2: alternatives to the ten commandments. To make heaven here on earth,
Speaker 2: he said, And so stuff like this, love and respect
Speaker 2: the planet. Again, this is the Captain Planet guy, worshiping
Speaker 2: what God has put us in charge of His stewards
Speaker 2: have no more than two children. You don't when I
Speaker 2: look at this. He was always such a radical environmentalist.
Speaker 2: I know a lot of people have done deep dives,
Speaker 2: and they got well established theories as to who they
Speaker 2: think or behind these Georgia guidestones. I always thought that
Speaker 2: he was involved in that in some way where he
Speaker 2: was funding it. He might not have been the guy
Speaker 2: who showed up to order the stones, but I just
Speaker 2: always could never get past the idea that I thought
Speaker 2: that Ted Turner was behind those things, because it sounds
Speaker 2: exactly like him. He said, use a few non renewable
Speaker 2: resources as possible, contribute to those less fortunate than yourself
Speaker 2: to help them become self sufficient. Well that's not on
Speaker 2: the Georgia guidstones. But again, all this stuff about not
Speaker 2: having any kids got to reduce the humans, because we
Speaker 2: are like a disease on this precious sentient planet of Gaya,
Speaker 2: he said. So support the total elimination of all nuclear,
Speaker 2: biological and chemical weapons, and support the United Nations. He said,
Speaker 2: Well again, he was an environmental activist extraordinaire and now
Speaker 2: he is a part of Mother Earth. I guess we
Speaker 2: could say, which is dust to dust? And we long
Speaker 2: return to that if that's all that we are nineteen
Speaker 2: eighty eight Reader's Digest profile. He framed his ambition in bold,
Speaker 2: larger than life terms. He said, I'm trying to set
Speaker 2: the all time record for achievement by one person in
Speaker 2: one lifetime, and that puts you in pretty big company.
Speaker 2: Alexander the Great, Napoleon Gandhi, Christ Mohammed Buddha, Washington, Roosevelt Churchill.
Speaker 2: So there you go. One of those is not like
Speaker 2: the other. Unfortunately for Ted, he missed the true meaning
Speaker 2: of life, I think. But again he had in the
Speaker 2: last several years he was suffering from a kind of
Speaker 2: dementia as well. And I saw this. Most Americans say
Speaker 2: they would give up nearly their entire paycheck for peace
Speaker 2: of mind. Well, you know, that's the thing is that
Speaker 2: money doesn't buy you peace of mind, and money doesn't
Speaker 2: buy you doesn't buy you love, doesn't buy you a
Speaker 2: lot of different things. But they said they would just
Speaker 2: like to stop worrying. You know, it's one of the
Speaker 2: things you'd like to say that Christians are losers. That's
Speaker 2: one of the things that Christians lose is their worry
Speaker 2: about life. They know who holds the future. Even though
Speaker 2: they don't know what the future holes, they know who
Speaker 2: holds it, and they have that trust, that piece that
Speaker 2: is there. That's one of the things that they've lost,
Speaker 2: is that anxiety that perhaps was a motivating factor in
Speaker 2: his life here. But yeah, he's not the only one
Speaker 2: who's involved in heavy self worship. We have. Obama has
Speaker 2: just opened up his I love that they call these
Speaker 2: things libraries. I do think these guys ever read Obama
Speaker 2: and Trump. I know Trump pretty much doesn't read. But
Speaker 2: they have revealed their libraries, and some people put up
Speaker 2: a picture of Trump's design for library. It's a glass skyscraper,
Speaker 2: pretty generic looking, quite frankly, and if you see the
Speaker 2: one on the right that's Obama's, it looks like an
Speaker 2: urban renewal train wreck. But the people there, maybe it's
Speaker 2: because it is an ice or the people there in
Speaker 2: Chicago where he built it, are not happy with him
Speaker 2: at all.
Speaker 12: This is what they're saying, Obama, We're calling on you
Speaker 12: and Michelle. You and Michelle coming apologized to Chicago for
Speaker 12: doing this. You coming apologize to south Shore, but moving
Speaker 12: all these people out, displacing all these people, having Jackie
Speaker 12: Bristol steal our property, Obama, before you come and cut
Speaker 12: that ribbon on this ugly building, coming apologized to the
Speaker 12: South side of Chicago, Chicago period period. People stood behind
Speaker 12: you thinking that you was gonna be about something and
Speaker 12: it wasn't about nothing.
Speaker 3: You owe us an apology.
Speaker 12: We want an apology from Barack Obama.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we we we here all summer until he comes.
Speaker 11: We here, we hear all summer until he comes.
Speaker 2: The moment to yell at him. Well, you know the
Speaker 2: thing is when we look at this, people will find
Speaker 2: all kinds of things to worship, the worship themselves, especially
Speaker 2: if they're the the elite, or worship themselves, but they're
Speaker 2: also you know, you got Kreak and Watson who want
Speaker 2: to worship aliens. Right, they looked at that, They looked
Speaker 2: at DNA. The guys who discovered it said, well, this
Speaker 2: is obviously design. Look at this, it's a code. We
Speaker 2: cracked that code. But it had to be intelligent. That
Speaker 2: couldn't have happened by accident, just like you know, you
Speaker 2: look at a car or building. You look at Obama's building.
Speaker 2: Somebody had to build that. They actually deliberately built a
Speaker 2: building that ugly, but you have to have a designer
Speaker 2: for that doesn't just happen. But Kreak and Watson, because
Speaker 2: they had decided that they were not going to recognize God.
Speaker 2: That was their pre presumption to begin with. They're going
Speaker 2: to create the idea that aliens came here and created
Speaker 2: the life. And so we got people like Richard Dawkins,
Speaker 2: We've got Spielberg. All these guys are ready to worship aliens,
Speaker 2: or in case of Richard Dawkins, he's ready to worship
Speaker 2: artificial intelligence. You don't think he had fallen his knees
Speaker 2: and worship aliens if he could see them. And then,
Speaker 2: of course we've got the Zionist Christians who are out
Speaker 2: there worshiping a foreign government that is murdering and starting
Speaker 2: wars all over the country. So why not worship space aliens?
Speaker 2: You know, when we got this, and we've got some
Speaker 2: pastors who are out there warning people have said the
Speaker 2: Trump alien files could shatter Christian beliefs. Churches should prepare
Speaker 2: for it, claim pastors. I just have to say that
Speaker 2: there isn't anything that Donald Trump or Pete Hegseth could
Speaker 2: tell me that would make me not believe the Bible.
Speaker 2: Believe these two guys. If they told me the sky
Speaker 2: is blue.
Speaker 3: Or looking up some real mind boggling lies, fellas, you
Speaker 3: better prepare, That's right.
Speaker 2: So again, would you believe anything this guy says? So
Speaker 2: they're saying this could shatter Christian beliefs. I don't believe
Speaker 2: it for a moment. You know, in the same way
Speaker 2: that Ted Turner's belief in God was not shattered by
Speaker 2: the day of his sister, he had already given that up.
Speaker 2: He never really had any understanding or faith in that anyway.
Speaker 2: And so again when we look at there really is
Speaker 2: a kind of a repeating pattern of attacks on the Bible.
Speaker 2: We've seen this for a very long time. We go
Speaker 2: back to the early eighteen hundreds. People said, well, I
Speaker 2: think that these different civilizations, we don't have any evidence
Speaker 2: that there were civilizations like the Hittite civilization or whatever.
Speaker 2: That's just a fairy tailor story, right, there's no evidence
Speaker 2: those civilizations existed. Well, they hadn't looked quite frankly, when
Speaker 2: they did go, when somebody finally did go, and you
Speaker 2: could see it in the artwork at the time as well.
Speaker 2: You would have a lot of artists, rem Brandt and
Speaker 2: others would paint pictures of stories from the Bible. And
Speaker 2: yet they would paint these people that were there a
Speaker 2: couple of thousand years earlier. They would paint them as
Speaker 2: if they were contemporary people. They paint them in the
Speaker 2: clothes that people would wear in their society and that time.
Speaker 2: And they would get the flora wrong, they would get
Speaker 2: the fauna wrong. They had never seen pyramids, they didn't
Speaker 2: know what any of this stuff look like. And we
Speaker 2: finally when they went there, and again I mentioned that,
Speaker 2: because it just shows underscores the pure ignorance of the
Speaker 2: people in terms of not seeing that. When they finally
Speaker 2: did go there and they found some of these things,
Speaker 2: then they started all archaeology for several decades was simply
Speaker 2: biblical archaeology. They could use the Bible and they had
Speaker 2: a starting point. They could basically use the Bible, and
Speaker 2: they could find these different places exactly as described in
Speaker 2: the Bible. It truly was amazing, and so things started
Speaker 2: to really change. People started to see some physical evidence,
Speaker 2: and so then there was something new that came, and
Speaker 2: it was Charles Darwin and his theory of molecules to
Speaker 2: man evolution. We're not talking about genetic variation, which of
Speaker 2: course is a real thing, but we're talking about his
Speaker 2: idea that one specie turns into another, one kind turns
Speaker 2: into another. And again it was profound ignorance. As I've
Speaker 2: mentioned before, if you go to the British Museum and
Speaker 2: you look at the exhibit that's there Charles Darwin, what
Speaker 2: his dust look like, What does instruments look like? In
Speaker 2: terms of being able to look at and observe things
Speaker 2: as you would need to do with science, he simply
Speaker 2: had a magnifying glass like you and I would use
Speaker 2: to burn ants or something. No wonder that he looked
Speaker 2: at a glass of water that was setting there getting stagnant,
Speaker 2: and the bacteria that was already there starts multiplying to
Speaker 2: the extent that he can see it. All of a
Speaker 2: sudden he thinks, well, that's spontaneous generation. We just had
Speaker 2: life come out of water. And we still see that.
Speaker 2: We still see people saying, well, look there's water on
Speaker 2: these other planets. That means that there's life. No, the
Speaker 2: water does not generate life. You're going back to Charles
Speaker 2: Darwin again. Now, it doesn't generate life. It is a
Speaker 2: necessary condition for life as we know it, but it
Speaker 2: is not sufficient as for life. Life is not going
Speaker 2: to evolve just because you've got water. And so we
Speaker 2: saw the same thing happen again, and that went through
Speaker 2: a period of time until people started actually being able
Speaker 2: to make scientific observation so they could see things like DNA,
Speaker 2: so they could see what was happening with microbiology. We
Speaker 2: had tiny machines within machines within machines, and as they
Speaker 2: looked at astronomy, they could see an expanding universe. They
Speaker 2: could see well, then it has to have some kind
Speaker 2: of a beginning, some kind of a point. What did that? Okay,
Speaker 2: did everything come from nothing? Well, if there was ever
Speaker 2: a time when there was nothing, there still would be nothing.
Speaker 2: You have to have an organizing principle. And so as
Speaker 2: people start to see that, and now we are winning
Speaker 2: that argument in terms of observation, now they think that
Speaker 2: they can run this alien scam on us. But the
Speaker 2: bottom line is that these other situations that had out
Speaker 2: there wasn't that archaeology did not prove the Bible right.
Speaker 2: The Bible proves itself right. It wasn't that scientists prove
Speaker 2: that evolution was wrong. The Bible shows what was true.
Speaker 2: It doesn't have to change. The science changes, the archaeology changes,
Speaker 2: our view of the world changes based on what we see.
Speaker 2: But the Bible remains constant and it has always been
Speaker 2: true and it will still be true, and it is
Speaker 2: the best evidence that we have, regardless of archaeological stuff
Speaker 2: or things that are very convincing. I think that you
Speaker 2: can make a convincing case for the shroud of turnin,
Speaker 2: but that's not the basis of what we put our
Speaker 2: faith in. The Bible is the thing that is going
Speaker 2: to be there, that is there, It's going to remain there.
Speaker 2: That's the key thing to remember. And yet you've got
Speaker 2: all these articles. Some guy who is there is his
Speaker 2: name Perry Stone. They say it's a well known evangelist,
Speaker 2: author and Bible teacher from tim See. Well, I don't
Speaker 2: know who he is, but I'm seeing this thing out
Speaker 2: there saying we got all these pastors who say they've
Speaker 2: been informed they've been meeting in secret with people from
Speaker 2: the Trump administration, that this is fairly damaging stuff to
Speaker 2: the Christian faith. No it isn't. This smacks, folks of
Speaker 2: the same kind of stuff that we have seen with QAnon.
Speaker 2: These people got some inside information from intelligence agents who
Speaker 2: are inside the Trump administration and all the rest of
Speaker 2: this bolooney, and it's the same game that's being played
Speaker 2: over and over again. As a matter of fact, they said,
Speaker 2: these are some really well known and respected pastors out
Speaker 2: there who were going to tell people. Well, you know,
Speaker 2: I can believe that because they used very well known
Speaker 2: and respected pastors to sell the lies about COVID. They
Speaker 2: came out. They war gamed this. I've shown you the
Speaker 2: clips of Curtis Chang. He was giving a lot of
Speaker 2: money by the Trump administration to come up with arguments
Speaker 2: to and he had Robert Jefferson, who's got this big
Speaker 2: church in Dallas, big Baptist church in Dallas, and he's
Speaker 2: one of the big Trump supporters. And so Robert Jefferris
Speaker 2: goes on with Curtis Chang. They talk about how pastors
Speaker 2: need to educate their people and tell them that they
Speaker 2: need to love their neighbor by getting a vaccine, and
Speaker 2: on and on. They used all the talking points that
Speaker 2: Yale psychologists had put together. They gave these talking points
Speaker 2: to these pastors and these other videos and seminars and stuff,
Speaker 2: said go out and tell this to your people that
Speaker 2: are out there. They had people like Franklin Graham who
Speaker 2: was pushing this kind of stuff. And so you just
Speaker 2: have to understand when you look at this, you have
Speaker 2: to use your discernment. You have to look at the
Speaker 2: bigger picture, and you got to look at the Bible
Speaker 2: that is there that's going to help you to get
Speaker 2: past a lot of this stuff. So they're going to
Speaker 2: be running this same type of game again. I just
Speaker 2: talked yesterday about how the Israeli government is using a
Speaker 2: lot of these Christian Zionists to do the same type
Speaker 2: of thing they did with COVID. We're going to tell
Speaker 2: the pastors and these wolves and the pulpit are going
Speaker 2: to tell their sheep what to do. And so don't
Speaker 2: be that kind of a sheep. Be as harmless as doves,
Speaker 2: but as wise as serpents, because there's some serpents out
Speaker 2: there who are going to be telling you some stories.
Speaker 2: Stone said, You're going to have people who are going
Speaker 2: to say, if there are galaxies, and if there are
Speaker 2: allegedly other creations in the galaxies, and the whole creation
Speaker 2: story is a myth, you're going to have people that
Speaker 2: are going to apostize and turn from the Christian faith
Speaker 2: because they have no answer for what they're about to hear. Well,
Speaker 2: I would suggest, you know, we saw the same thing
Speaker 2: happening with evolution, like I mentioned before, with archaeology and
Speaker 2: other things like that. I would just suggest if you've
Speaker 2: got any questions about things like the Great Apologetics Ministry
Speaker 2: is Answers in Genesis in Kenham, and they do have
Speaker 2: the answers there, and they are answers that come from
Speaker 2: the Bible, not from somebody who has a worldview that's
Speaker 2: going to start by excluding God, like you have with
Speaker 2: Ted Turner, or like you had with Krick and Watson.
Speaker 2: Real science actually reinforces our understanding of God. And I
Speaker 2: think what we're probably going to see from this is
Speaker 2: we're going to see some multidimensional If there is any
Speaker 2: evidence of this, it will be multi dimensional, and in
Speaker 2: a sense, when it's rightly understood, it will be consistent
Speaker 2: with the Bible, and it will reinforce the Bible. So
Speaker 2: I'm not worried about it. They've got these people. Here's
Speaker 2: another guy who's really well known, they said, Bishop Alan
Speaker 2: Diddio of the Revival Nation Church. Never heard of him.
Speaker 2: And another guy, podcaster Tony Merkle. I looked at this
Speaker 2: stuff and it is like this is a Daily Mail article.
Speaker 2: It reminded me of the Seven Sons a Shiva, the
Speaker 2: Jewish exorcist, who are going around. Because Paul and other
Speaker 2: people were casting out demons, they decide they'd start doing
Speaker 2: it as well. So they said, in the name of Jesus,
Speaker 2: we're going to and the guy that's poss with these.
Speaker 3: Er and Paul. I know that's right, but who are you?
Speaker 2: Who are you? And so I would say the same thing,
Speaker 2: You're going to look at this and say, Tony Merkle
Speaker 2: and Bishop Allen Diddio, I don't know these guys, but
Speaker 2: I know Jesus and he's the one who casts out
Speaker 2: these these doubts, these issues and things like that. But
Speaker 2: just beware of these people. Again, there's this this mystique
Speaker 2: that they're creating to say that there's some people on
Speaker 2: the inside. He said, these guys are part of let's
Speaker 2: just say that they're Christians who are in intelligence operations.
Speaker 2: Is there some He's a Christian, but he works with
Speaker 2: the CIA. You can trust him, right, He's not like
Speaker 2: Michael Flynn who's out there leading prayers to ascended masters
Speaker 2: that he's plagiarized from Elizabeth Clare prophet from nineteen eighty are.
Speaker 2: They're not people like Steve A. Chank. No, No, you
Speaker 2: can really trust these people. Well, I know what you
Speaker 2: can can trust, and it's not these people. And it's
Speaker 2: not somebody who's got the secret Decota ring because they
Speaker 2: work on the inside of the Trump administration. None of
Speaker 2: that stuff is anything that is really going to serve you. Well,
Speaker 2: so just spot the counterfeits that are out there. All
Speaker 2: three men urge churches to get ready now, so believers
Speaker 2: would not be shocked or deceived, but instead stay grounded
Speaker 2: in the Bible and their belief in Jesus throughout this
Speaker 2: great deception. Well again, the old story was that in
Speaker 2: the old days, when they weren't messing with the money
Speaker 2: all the time, they would train the bank tellers to
Speaker 2: spot counterfeits by teaching them what a real bill looked like.
Speaker 2: And that's the key thing. You want to look at
Speaker 2: what the real thing is. So that is where the
Speaker 2: answer is. Your faith is going to come from hearing
Speaker 2: God's word. And if you have that kind of faith,
Speaker 2: it's not going to be shaken with anything that the
Speaker 2: CIA or Donald Trump. But that truly is crazy here.
Speaker 2: But let's take an a couple of minutes that we
Speaker 2: got here. I thought, this is really interesting what is
Speaker 2: happening with Waymo and with robots. We got a man
Speaker 2: who took a Waymo to the airport. He gets out
Speaker 2: of the car and he goes to the back to
Speaker 2: get his luggage out of the trunk. He pushes the button,
Speaker 2: but it doesn't open up, and the car drove away.
Speaker 2: There's no money in the car. He couldn't get it
Speaker 2: to stop. He contacts Weimo, and he goes, you know,
Speaker 2: all my luggage is in the trunk of one of
Speaker 2: your cars. And they said, well, we've got it safely
Speaker 2: at our local depot. And he says, well mail it
Speaker 2: to me. He said, no, no, we're unable to do that.
Speaker 2: They just you know, Alphabet, one of the richest corporations
Speaker 2: that ever existed, is unable to help him in this.
Speaker 2: They said, we'ren't able to cover the cost of shipping
Speaker 2: or courier fees. But you know, we'll have it here
Speaker 2: for you and when you come back, we'll even credit
Speaker 2: you a ride on one of our cars to come
Speaker 2: get your luggage. Oh boy, you better put it in
Speaker 2: the seat with him if if he does that. And
Speaker 2: then in Austin, we had a car that was blocking
Speaker 2: traffic a way Moo got stumped by a small puddle
Speaker 2: and so it stopped and clogged one lane and created
Speaker 2: a massive traffic jam. Flum mixed by a small puddle
Speaker 2: there in Austin, stalled out on the left side of
Speaker 2: a two lane road, refusing to get its tires wet
Speaker 2: in a small puddle under an overpass, taking up an
Speaker 2: entire lane. The Waymo forced traffic to converge around it
Speaker 2: while it's sat there in a daze. And then at
Speaker 2: the same time, because the way Austin is set up,
Speaker 2: they had some massive flooding in some other areas where
Speaker 2: the Waymos just went straight through the flood. And so
Speaker 2: the question is, you know, when you look at the
Speaker 2: streets in Austin, instead of fixing the roads, what they'll
Speaker 2: do Isy'll put up a sign this area is gonna
Speaker 2: flood when it rains. They won't do anything about the
Speaker 2: drainage or and they just put up a sign. And
Speaker 2: I guess the Waymo things can't read that. Well.
Speaker 3: You know what they say, more driverless cars, way mow problems,
Speaker 3: that's right.
Speaker 2: So they're gonna have way moo flooding and way more
Speaker 2: stalling as well with that kind of stuff. Meanwhile, you've
Speaker 2: got the robots are coming in big ways and they're
Speaker 2: really ramping this stuff up. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: Figure thinks that you're going to be able to get
Speaker 2: one of these things for I don't know, maybe about
Speaker 2: six hundred dollars a month. They said, oh, well, sign
Speaker 2: me up. You know, I guess if you can afford
Speaker 2: to have a maid, this is even cheaper than an
Speaker 2: illegal alien coming in. I guess maybe they pay the
Speaker 2: maids more than six hundred a month. I don't know
Speaker 2: what they pay them. Maybe maybe not, I don't know.
Speaker 2: But again, this is their selling point. Do the dishes,
Speaker 2: do the laundry, that type of thing for just six
Speaker 2: hundred a month. They have been rapidly escalating these things.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, they've been doubling the number
Speaker 2: that they've been shipping each month to where they've gotten
Speaker 2: now a couple hundred that they shipped in the last month.
Speaker 2: And yet when you look at what China is doing,
Speaker 2: they're shipping thousands of them a month, so they're way
Speaker 2: ahead in terms of that. But this is the kind
Speaker 2: of society that we're looking at. They had a one
Speaker 2: of these little what they call a rismobot or something
Speaker 2: that was Risbot Risbot. It was in Austin. They put
Speaker 2: one of these things on a plane because it's too
Speaker 2: big to check in, and then when they put on
Speaker 2: the plane, the stewardesses are worried about it maybe acting
Speaker 2: up or something. So they had like they had the
Speaker 2: whole plane stall for an hour as they figured out
Speaker 2: what to do with a robot setting in one of
Speaker 2: the seats. These are going to be the first world
Speaker 2: problems that some of us are going to be dealing with.
Speaker 2: Even if you don't own a robot, somebody that does
Speaker 2: may be delaying your plane for hours. Who knows, but
Speaker 2: we have it. We're out of time. We're gonna not
Speaker 2: keep going at this point. But thank you so much
Speaker 2: for joining us. Have a good day. The common man.
Speaker 2: They created common Core and dumbed down our children. They
Speaker 2: created common past, track and control us their Commons project
Speaker 2: to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
Speaker 2: They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
Speaker 2: each of us has worth and dignity, created in the
Speaker 2: image of God. That is what we have in common.
Speaker 2: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 2: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 2: everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 2: time to turn that around and expose what they want
Speaker 2: to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find
Speaker 2: at the Davidknightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
Speaker 2: you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
Speaker 2: keep us in your prayers. The Davidnightshow dot com