1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:04,040
Speaker 1: Welcome to thrilling threads. So let's start with a thought experiment.

2
00:00:04,360 --> 00:00:07,799
It's one that really challenges everything you think you know

3
00:00:07,839 --> 00:00:08,679
about your own life.

4
00:00:08,720 --> 00:00:09,519
Speaker 2: Okay, I'm ready.

5
00:00:10,519 --> 00:00:14,320
Speaker 1: What if every single choice you've ever made, every argument,

6
00:00:14,400 --> 00:00:18,719
every moment of you know, triumph for heartbreak, what if

7
00:00:18,719 --> 00:00:22,120
it was all just data being processed? Yeah, your entire life,

8
00:00:22,160 --> 00:00:27,440
This reality programmed not by some divine being but by

9
00:00:27,879 --> 00:00:29,800
what one of the thinkers we're looking at today calls

10
00:00:29,839 --> 00:00:33,119
a snot nosed alien kid in their parents' basement.

11
00:00:33,399 --> 00:00:37,119
Speaker 3: Wow, that is It's a heck of an image. It's funny,

12
00:00:37,159 --> 00:00:39,520
but it's also, you know, deeply unsettling.

13
00:00:39,600 --> 00:00:39,719
Speaker 1: Right.

14
00:00:39,759 --> 00:00:42,119
Speaker 3: It just perfectly sets up the tension we're getting into today.

15
00:00:42,200 --> 00:00:44,920
We're looking at material from the video the Real Reason

16
00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:47,960
scientists know. We're in a simulation from the diary of

17
00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:49,640
a CEO clips channel, and it.

18
00:00:49,600 --> 00:00:52,119
Speaker 1: Really forces you to grapple with these huge concepts.

19
00:00:52,200 --> 00:00:52,479
Speaker 2: Huge.

20
00:00:52,600 --> 00:00:55,079
Speaker 3: It moves so fast from the like the cold math

21
00:00:55,119 --> 00:00:57,079
of whether we're real, to the ethics of living forever

22
00:00:57,119 --> 00:00:59,920
and then all the way to these are really surprising,

23
00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:02,560
almost cynical reasons for why humanity hasn't reached.

24
00:01:02,320 --> 00:01:05,959
Speaker 1: Mars yet and that's our mission today, really to navigate

25
00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:08,480
all of these threats. We want to understand that deep

26
00:01:08,560 --> 00:01:11,680
contrast between our own drive for free will.

27
00:01:11,799 --> 00:01:14,760
Speaker 3: And meaning and on the other hand, the statistical and

28
00:01:14,879 --> 00:01:19,000
historical logic that suggests we might just be operating within

29
00:01:19,040 --> 00:01:21,000
some kind of predetermined.

30
00:01:20,319 --> 00:01:23,200
Speaker 1: Box, whether that box is a computer program or just

31
00:01:23,319 --> 00:01:26,799
the cold logic of global competition.

32
00:01:27,040 --> 00:01:31,079
Speaker 3: And what's so fascinating now is that this old philosophical

33
00:01:31,319 --> 00:01:35,799
question reality versus illusion, it's not just an academic game anymore,

34
00:01:35,840 --> 00:01:38,840
not at all. Technology has completely transformed it. I mean,

35
00:01:39,040 --> 00:01:42,200
with the growth of computing power, especially with quantum physics,

36
00:01:42,680 --> 00:01:46,319
the idea of building a simulated world with conscious beings

37
00:01:46,359 --> 00:01:47,400
inside it.

38
00:01:47,079 --> 00:01:48,319
Speaker 1: It feels less like sci fi.

39
00:01:48,480 --> 00:01:51,480
Speaker 3: It feels less like science fiction and more like an

40
00:01:51,560 --> 00:01:53,439
engineering problem we just haven't solved yet.

41
00:01:53,480 --> 00:01:56,000
Speaker 1: Okay, so let's unpack that. Let's start with the foundational logic,

42
00:01:56,040 --> 00:01:58,760
this concept of the chain of simulated universes.

43
00:01:58,840 --> 00:02:01,640
Speaker 3: Right, it starts with the premise that's well, it's logical,

44
00:02:01,719 --> 00:02:05,120
but it's also terrifying if an advanced life form let's

45
00:02:05,120 --> 00:02:07,879
call them universe one, the real one, if they ever

46
00:02:07,959 --> 00:02:10,639
get the ability to create a computer world with characters

47
00:02:10,680 --> 00:02:12,759
who are fully conscious characters.

48
00:02:12,479 --> 00:02:14,879
Speaker 1: Who believe, you know, one percent, that they have.

49
00:02:14,800 --> 00:02:18,479
Speaker 3: Free will, then that advanced life form will create those simulations.

50
00:02:18,520 --> 00:02:20,439
It's not a maybe, it's an inevitability.

51
00:02:20,520 --> 00:02:24,639
Speaker 1: That's the first domino to fall. The capacity itself becomes

52
00:02:24,639 --> 00:02:25,439
the reason.

53
00:02:25,159 --> 00:02:26,280
Speaker 2: To do it exactly.

54
00:02:26,680 --> 00:02:29,240
Speaker 3: But the real mind bender is what happens next, the

55
00:02:29,280 --> 00:02:33,800
cascading effect. Okay, so once those simulated characters in Universe

56
00:02:33,800 --> 00:02:37,159
two evolve their own technology far enough.

57
00:02:36,960 --> 00:02:39,319
Speaker 1: If they would do faster, right, because they're in a

58
00:02:39,319 --> 00:02:41,479
simulation not necessarily bound by our.

59
00:02:41,400 --> 00:02:45,879
Speaker 3: Physics precisely, they too will eventually invent computers powerful enough

60
00:02:45,879 --> 00:02:51,039
to create their own immersive, conscious simulated world Universe three, and.

61
00:02:50,960 --> 00:02:53,400
Speaker 1: So on and so on. Universe three simulates four, four,

62
00:02:53,439 --> 00:02:56,879
simulis five. It's like the source says, simulated universes all

63
00:02:56,919 --> 00:02:57,439
the way down.

64
00:02:57,479 --> 00:03:00,840
Speaker 3: It's like a nested Russian doll of reality is a

65
00:03:01,000 --> 00:03:03,639
fractal And the key here, the really spooky part, is

66
00:03:03,680 --> 00:03:06,919
that these have to be perfect simulations, meaning what meaning

67
00:03:07,159 --> 00:03:10,280
the characters inside the code us perhaps we can't detect

68
00:03:10,319 --> 00:03:12,319
the system. There's no way for us to see the

69
00:03:12,360 --> 00:03:15,000
glitches in the matrix, so to speak.

70
00:03:15,039 --> 00:03:17,360
Speaker 1: And that's where the physics comes in. We don't have

71
00:03:17,400 --> 00:03:20,719
that power yet, not even close. Our attempts at rendering

72
00:03:20,719 --> 00:03:23,360
reality are still, you know, a bit clunky.

73
00:03:23,599 --> 00:03:27,719
Speaker 3: But the curve of technology, especially with things like quantum computing,

74
00:03:28,159 --> 00:03:30,680
suggests that barrier is just technical.

75
00:03:30,759 --> 00:03:33,520
Speaker 2: It's not impossible. It's just a matter of scale and time.

76
00:03:33,680 --> 00:03:36,000
Speaker 1: Okay, So that leads to the statistical argument, the one

77
00:03:36,000 --> 00:03:38,479
that really messes with your head, the probability problems.

78
00:03:38,560 --> 00:03:42,439
Speaker 3: Yeah, or the dart analogy explain that if this chain exists,

79
00:03:42,479 --> 00:03:46,719
and universe one creates, say a dozen simulated copies, and

80
00:03:46,759 --> 00:03:49,639
each of those creates a dozen more, you quickly end

81
00:03:49,719 --> 00:03:53,520
up with just one original real universe and a.

82
00:03:53,639 --> 00:03:56,080
Speaker 1: Zillion simulated copies. As the source puts.

83
00:03:55,840 --> 00:03:57,599
Speaker 2: It, the math is just brutal.

84
00:03:57,680 --> 00:03:59,680
Speaker 3: If you close your eyes and throw a dart at

85
00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:02,800
this infinite chain of realities, where is it most likely

86
00:04:02,840 --> 00:04:04,680
to land in one of the coffees?

87
00:04:04,960 --> 00:04:06,080
Speaker 1: The odds are overwhelming.

88
00:04:06,319 --> 00:04:08,840
Speaker 3: It's a zillion to one against us being in that

89
00:04:08,919 --> 00:04:12,840
first original universe. It's a numbers game, and we lose.

90
00:04:13,319 --> 00:04:16,720
The sheer number of simulated people just dwarfs the number

91
00:04:16,759 --> 00:04:17,600
of original ones.

92
00:04:17,639 --> 00:04:21,560
Speaker 1: That's yeah, that's a pretty compelling, but honestly a depressing

93
00:04:21,560 --> 00:04:24,399
piece of logic. It is. If I accept that, then

94
00:04:24,519 --> 00:04:27,399
my whole existence is just some minor function running on

95
00:04:27,439 --> 00:04:29,720
a server somewhere which I don't know. It makes you

96
00:04:29,720 --> 00:04:30,879
feel incredibly small.

97
00:04:31,000 --> 00:04:31,519
Speaker 2: I get it.

98
00:04:32,079 --> 00:04:34,519
Speaker 3: But this is where the conversation takes a brilliant turn.

99
00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:38,199
It introduces a counter argument, the escape hatch, the thing that.

100
00:04:38,240 --> 00:04:40,319
Speaker 1: Lets the speaker in the video sleep a.

101
00:04:40,240 --> 00:04:43,160
Speaker 3: Little better exactly, And this is where my skeptical brain

102
00:04:43,240 --> 00:04:47,079
gets really interested. The escape patch depends completely on our

103
00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:49,079
current technological limits.

104
00:04:48,800 --> 00:04:52,199
Speaker 1: The fact that we right now humanity in twenty twenty

105
00:04:52,240 --> 00:04:56,360
four don't have the power to create a perfect simulation

106
00:04:56,560 --> 00:04:58,079
with conscious beings inside.

107
00:04:58,279 --> 00:05:02,040
Speaker 3: Yes, we're still year, there's centuries away from that kind

108
00:05:02,079 --> 00:05:05,519
of quantum power. So if that's true, logically we have

109
00:05:05,560 --> 00:05:08,360
to belong to one of only two specific types of universe.

110
00:05:08,439 --> 00:05:10,360
Speaker 1: Okay, so you cut out the whole middle of the chain,

111
00:05:10,560 --> 00:05:11,480
You cut it all out.

112
00:05:12,040 --> 00:05:14,720
Speaker 3: If having the ability to simulate is the ticket to

113
00:05:14,759 --> 00:05:17,040
the party, and we don't have a ticket yet, then

114
00:05:17,120 --> 00:05:17,759
we must be.

115
00:05:17,839 --> 00:05:22,920
Speaker 1: Either one the first real universe that just hasn't gotten

116
00:05:22,959 --> 00:05:23,639
there yet, or.

117
00:05:23,560 --> 00:05:26,519
Speaker 3: Two the very last universe in the entire chain that

118
00:05:26,720 --> 00:05:28,199
hasn't evolved to that point yet.

119
00:05:28,120 --> 00:05:30,879
Speaker 1: Because all the ones in between have already passed that milestone.

120
00:05:30,920 --> 00:05:32,199
The've already created their copies.

121
00:05:32,399 --> 00:05:35,240
Speaker 3: Our current inability to do it becomes our best defense.

122
00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:38,319
It's our probabilistic alibi, and.

123
00:05:38,240 --> 00:05:42,120
Speaker 1: That just completely flips the odds. It goes from a

124
00:05:42,240 --> 00:05:44,879
zillion to one against us to a straight fifty to

125
00:05:44,920 --> 00:05:45,879
fifty coin flip.

126
00:05:45,959 --> 00:05:47,720
Speaker 2: Are we the first or are we the last?

127
00:05:47,839 --> 00:05:50,240
Speaker 3: It's kind of a beautiful piece of logic that uses

128
00:05:50,279 --> 00:05:53,360
our own, you know, technological lag as a source of comfort.

129
00:05:53,600 --> 00:05:56,680
Speaker 1: It's strange, right, Our limitations are what make us potentially real.

130
00:05:56,879 --> 00:05:59,399
Speaker 3: Yeah, if we were way more advanced, the odds would

131
00:05:59,399 --> 00:06:01,240
flip right back to being terrible for us.

132
00:06:01,319 --> 00:06:04,279
Speaker 1: Okay, So even if we accept that fifty to fifty chance,

133
00:06:05,120 --> 00:06:07,560
we still have to deal with the other big argument

134
00:06:07,639 --> 00:06:10,120
for being in a simulation, which is why is our

135
00:06:10,120 --> 00:06:16,319
reality so consistently chaotic, so punctuated by a drama and disaster?

136
00:06:16,680 --> 00:06:21,120
Speaker 3: Ah? Yes, disaster as programming input, or, as you could

137
00:06:21,160 --> 00:06:22,639
call it, the programmer's boredom.

138
00:06:23,120 --> 00:06:26,480
Speaker 1: This theory suggests that the pattern of huge global disasters

139
00:06:26,879 --> 00:06:27,839
isn't random at all.

140
00:06:28,040 --> 00:06:32,959
Speaker 3: No, it's perfectly consistent with a simulation being run for say, entertainment,

141
00:06:33,920 --> 00:06:36,000
or for research that needs.

142
00:06:35,800 --> 00:06:36,600
Speaker 2: A lot of variables.

143
00:06:36,600 --> 00:06:38,759
Speaker 1: This makes a weird kind of sense. If you're running

144
00:06:38,759 --> 00:06:42,759
this massive, complex simulation and everything is stable and predictable.

145
00:06:42,879 --> 00:06:44,600
GDP is up, everyone's happy.

146
00:06:44,639 --> 00:06:46,959
Speaker 2: It gets boring, the plot goes stale. So what do

147
00:06:47,000 --> 00:06:47,439
you do?

148
00:06:47,480 --> 00:06:50,879
Speaker 1: You stir the pot. You introduce chaos to keep things engaging.

149
00:06:51,240 --> 00:06:54,040
Speaker 3: And the source points directly to the COVID nineteen pandemic

150
00:06:54,120 --> 00:06:56,800
as a perfect example of a pot stirring event, a

151
00:06:56,839 --> 00:06:58,839
once in a century global catastrophe.

152
00:06:59,000 --> 00:07:02,959
Speaker 1: Right, A pandemic creates instant worldwide drama. It forces all

153
00:07:03,000 --> 00:07:04,920
these new interesting choices.

154
00:07:05,040 --> 00:07:08,360
Speaker 3: Who fights over the vaccine, who denies it's real, Who

155
00:07:08,480 --> 00:07:09,560
profits from the chaos?

156
00:07:09,639 --> 00:07:10,240
Speaker 2: Who dies?

157
00:07:10,360 --> 00:07:12,879
Speaker 3: These are all new dramatic arcs for the programmer to

158
00:07:12,959 --> 00:07:13,680
watch unfold.

159
00:07:14,000 --> 00:07:15,839
Speaker 1: And then when the world starts to calm down, when

160
00:07:15,839 --> 00:07:18,759
we get the virus sort of under control, what happens next?

161
00:07:19,000 --> 00:07:20,040
Speaker 2: The video points it out.

162
00:07:20,079 --> 00:07:23,800
Speaker 3: You get the rise of this totally unprecedented political figure,

163
00:07:24,519 --> 00:07:28,000
a billionaire real estate developer from New York City becomes

164
00:07:28,040 --> 00:07:30,199
the most powerful person on earth.

165
00:07:29,959 --> 00:07:33,160
Speaker 1: And that, as the source says, kicks off a whole

166
00:07:33,199 --> 00:07:36,240
other set of stir pots stirring, the drama has to

167
00:07:36,319 --> 00:07:36,879
keep going.

168
00:07:37,199 --> 00:07:39,519
Speaker 3: It's a really powerful way to look at history because

169
00:07:39,519 --> 00:07:43,160
it aligns so well with how we treat our own simulations.

170
00:07:43,360 --> 00:07:44,959
Speaker 1: You mean, like the game SimCity.

171
00:07:45,040 --> 00:07:46,839
Speaker 3: Sim City is the perfect analogy.

172
00:07:46,879 --> 00:07:47,079
Speaker 2: Here.

173
00:07:47,319 --> 00:07:52,199
Speaker 3: You spend hours right building your perfect city, optimizing traffic,

174
00:07:52,319 --> 00:07:53,399
balancing the budget.

175
00:07:53,680 --> 00:07:57,360
Speaker 1: You achieve this perfect stable utopia. And what's the first

176
00:07:57,399 --> 00:07:58,040
thing you want to do.

177
00:07:58,199 --> 00:07:59,959
Speaker 2: You want to break it. You go to the disag

178
00:08:00,000 --> 00:08:00,600
aster menu.

179
00:08:00,800 --> 00:08:01,959
Speaker 1: You unleash Godzilla.

180
00:08:02,120 --> 00:08:06,120
Speaker 3: No unleashed Adzilla. Because the simulation is only interesting when disastrous,

181
00:08:06,199 --> 00:08:09,600
unexpected things happen. And the source argues that the sheer

182
00:08:09,680 --> 00:08:12,639
frequency of these Godzilla moments in our own history is

183
00:08:12,720 --> 00:08:16,480
the strongest non mathematical argument for being in a simulation.

184
00:08:16,160 --> 00:08:18,759
Speaker 1: And the historical examples are chilling when you see them

185
00:08:18,759 --> 00:08:21,920
through that lens. The interview in the source video actually

186
00:08:21,920 --> 00:08:25,199
took place on September eleventh, and the speaker calls that

187
00:08:25,279 --> 00:08:29,399
event a perfect example of Godzilla walking through the city.

188
00:08:29,759 --> 00:08:32,639
One event that completely changed the trajectory of the entire

189
00:08:32,679 --> 00:08:34,000
world in a single day.

190
00:08:34,039 --> 00:08:35,080
Speaker 2: And you can just keep going back.

191
00:08:35,120 --> 00:08:37,320
Speaker 3: Look at the timeline they mentioned after World War one,

192
00:08:37,360 --> 00:08:39,080
you have this fragile piece which.

193
00:08:38,879 --> 00:08:41,720
Speaker 1: Is immediately smashed by the nineteen eighteen flu pandemic.

194
00:08:41,879 --> 00:08:45,159
Speaker 3: Then humanity recovers, only to be thrown straight into World

195
00:08:45,240 --> 00:08:48,240
War II and after that the Cold War with the

196
00:08:48,399 --> 00:08:50,440
constant threat of nuclear annihilation.

197
00:08:50,679 --> 00:08:55,200
Speaker 1: These aren't small adjustments. These are massive civilization altering plot

198
00:08:55,200 --> 00:08:58,440
points perfectly time to keep the story from getting dull.

199
00:08:58,720 --> 00:09:00,720
Speaker 3: So if you accept this, you can sort of create

200
00:09:00,759 --> 00:09:02,480
a profile of the programmer.

201
00:09:02,679 --> 00:09:04,559
Speaker 2: They hate boredom, they despise it.

202
00:09:04,720 --> 00:09:07,840
Speaker 3: Their main goal seems to be generating high stakes conflict,

203
00:09:08,200 --> 00:09:12,759
and that gives our suffering this really weird and perverse purpose.

204
00:09:13,399 --> 00:09:15,399
Speaker 1: We are the entertainment, which is where a lot of

205
00:09:15,399 --> 00:09:18,759
people just check out. If it's all predetermined for some

206
00:09:18,879 --> 00:09:21,000
alien's amusement, why even bother?

207
00:09:21,320 --> 00:09:24,679
Speaker 3: Right, But that's where the source pivots so effectively arguing

208
00:09:24,720 --> 00:09:27,399
that whether we're puppets or not, it doesn't actually change

209
00:09:27,399 --> 00:09:28,240
how we should live.

210
00:09:28,480 --> 00:09:32,559
Speaker 1: So that's the big philosophical question that follows. Right, if

211
00:09:32,559 --> 00:09:34,960
we are in a simulation, does it matter?

212
00:09:35,080 --> 00:09:37,320
Speaker 2: And the answer given is this really pragmatic.

213
00:09:37,639 --> 00:09:41,639
Speaker 1: No, it doesn't, because if we're simulated, we're programmed to

214
00:09:41,679 --> 00:09:45,240
believe we have free will, and if we can't tell

215
00:09:45,279 --> 00:09:46,360
the difference, then.

216
00:09:46,240 --> 00:09:51,000
Speaker 3: For all practical purposes, our perceived reality is our reality.

217
00:09:51,039 --> 00:09:52,279
Speaker 2: You might as well act as if.

218
00:09:52,159 --> 00:09:54,279
Speaker 1: You're free It reminds me of that old joke, you know,

219
00:09:54,720 --> 00:09:57,080
someone asks the philosopher do you believe in free will?

220
00:09:57,399 --> 00:10:00,960
And he says, what choice do I have? Paradox doesn't matter,

221
00:10:01,000 --> 00:10:02,840
because the subjective experience is.

222
00:10:02,799 --> 00:10:06,279
Speaker 3: All we have, and that leads to this practical mandate,

223
00:10:06,279 --> 00:10:09,480
which is really the key takeaway from this whole section.

224
00:10:09,879 --> 00:10:12,240
No matter if we're real or not, your duty is

225
00:10:12,279 --> 00:10:14,480
to just live your life so that the world is

226
00:10:14,480 --> 00:10:16,639
better off for you having lived in it.

227
00:10:16,639 --> 00:10:20,120
Speaker 1: It's such a clear, almost brutally simple way to measure

228
00:10:20,159 --> 00:10:20,600
your life.

229
00:10:20,759 --> 00:10:22,919
Speaker 3: And the definition of better off is important too. It's

230
00:10:22,919 --> 00:10:25,200
not just about you know your own happiness or your

231
00:10:25,240 --> 00:10:25,639
own wealth.

232
00:10:25,720 --> 00:10:28,519
Speaker 1: No, it extends way beyond that. It means making sure

233
00:10:28,559 --> 00:10:31,799
other people are happier, healthier, wealthier, safer, better fed.

234
00:10:32,120 --> 00:10:36,039
Speaker 3: But then there's this deeper structural part to it, ensuring

235
00:10:36,080 --> 00:10:39,320
that rationality matters in politics and lawmaking.

236
00:10:40,039 --> 00:10:41,559
Speaker 1: Why is that so important.

237
00:10:41,279 --> 00:10:46,440
Speaker 3: Because without stable rational institutions, all the personal improvements you

238
00:10:46,519 --> 00:10:49,080
make can be wiped out in an instant by some

239
00:10:49,279 --> 00:10:51,440
crazy collective decision.

240
00:10:51,159 --> 00:10:53,240
Speaker 1: So you have to improve yourself and the system at

241
00:10:53,240 --> 00:10:53,799
the same.

242
00:10:53,559 --> 00:10:54,519
Speaker 2: Time, exactly.

243
00:10:55,120 --> 00:10:58,080
Speaker 3: And this leads to a really crucial distinction that the

244
00:10:58,120 --> 00:11:03,159
analysis makes, the difference between finding meaning and making meaning.

245
00:11:03,519 --> 00:11:05,720
Speaker 1: I think this is so powerful. We always hear people

246
00:11:05,720 --> 00:11:08,240
say they're searching for meaning as if it's.

247
00:11:08,120 --> 00:11:10,720
Speaker 3: A physical object you can find, like it's hiding under

248
00:11:10,720 --> 00:11:14,720
a rock behind a tree. The source really criticizes that viewpoint.

249
00:11:14,360 --> 00:11:16,799
Speaker 1: Because it's so passive, isn't it. It makes you feel powerless

250
00:11:16,799 --> 00:11:19,519
on your own destiny, waiting for meaning to just appear.

251
00:11:19,759 --> 00:11:22,639
Speaker 3: It treats meaning as this external thing that the simulation

252
00:11:22,879 --> 00:11:25,600
or fate just gives you. The alternative is so much

253
00:11:25,679 --> 00:11:26,879
more empowering.

254
00:11:26,480 --> 00:11:29,519
Speaker 1: To make meaning actively every single day. Right.

255
00:11:29,720 --> 00:11:32,960
Speaker 3: It shifts the focus away from some grand cosmic purpose

256
00:11:33,279 --> 00:11:36,200
and towards tangible, daily beneficial actions.

257
00:11:36,559 --> 00:11:38,240
Speaker 1: And what I love is that it boils it down

258
00:11:38,240 --> 00:11:43,600
to two incredibly simple daily mandates a checklist.

259
00:11:43,679 --> 00:11:44,480
Speaker 2: Okay, what are they?

260
00:11:44,799 --> 00:11:47,840
Speaker 1: First? The intellectual one, I want to learn something today

261
00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:49,759
that I didn't know yesterday.

262
00:11:49,360 --> 00:11:52,759
Speaker 3: The foundation of self improvement. If you're not learning, you're stagnating.

263
00:11:52,960 --> 00:11:56,360
Speaker 1: And the second one is altruistic. I want to lessen

264
00:11:56,399 --> 00:11:57,840
the suffering of someone today.

265
00:11:58,080 --> 00:11:58,480
Speaker 3: Wow.

266
00:11:58,919 --> 00:12:01,000
Speaker 2: Think about how those two work together, right.

267
00:12:01,399 --> 00:12:04,480
Speaker 1: The first one gives you the tools the knowledge to

268
00:12:04,519 --> 00:12:06,519
figure out how to solve problems.

269
00:12:06,240 --> 00:12:08,519
Speaker 3: And the second one gives you the moral imperative to

270
00:12:08,600 --> 00:12:10,159
actually go out and do it.

271
00:12:10,159 --> 00:12:15,480
Speaker 1: It's about constant, tangible progress, both for yourself and for others, and.

272
00:12:15,440 --> 00:12:18,559
Speaker 3: That constant progress is what leads to the ultimate goal,

273
00:12:18,840 --> 00:12:19,679
which is wisdom.

274
00:12:20,159 --> 00:12:23,600
Speaker 1: The analysis lays out this really clear progression. At the bottom,

275
00:12:23,799 --> 00:12:26,039
you have raw information, which.

276
00:12:25,879 --> 00:12:27,639
Speaker 2: Is useless on its own. It's just data.

277
00:12:28,039 --> 00:12:31,039
Speaker 3: But when you process it, when you add context, information

278
00:12:31,159 --> 00:12:32,519
becomes knowledge.

279
00:12:32,080 --> 00:12:34,960
Speaker 1: And knowledge is good. You can win on game shows

280
00:12:34,960 --> 00:12:36,639
with knowledge, you can get a good job.

281
00:12:36,919 --> 00:12:39,919
Speaker 3: But it's still not the end goal. The true synthesis,

282
00:12:40,000 --> 00:12:43,720
the highest value is when knowledge becomes wisdom.

283
00:12:43,639 --> 00:12:46,879
Speaker 1: And wisdom is when you stop just knowing facts and

284
00:12:46,919 --> 00:12:51,159
start understanding how they connect their implications, how to apply

285
00:12:51,279 --> 00:12:52,799
them to real world problems.

286
00:12:52,879 --> 00:12:55,000
Speaker 3: It's the why and the how. And this is why

287
00:12:55,039 --> 00:12:58,480
the source argues so strongly against wanting to be young forever.

288
00:12:58,799 --> 00:13:02,440
Speaker 1: If you're just getting older without getting wiser than you are,

289
00:13:02,879 --> 00:13:05,679
and I'm quoting here, just getting old with nothing to

290
00:13:05,720 --> 00:13:07,039
show for it ouch.

291
00:13:08,440 --> 00:13:11,879
Speaker 3: But it's true, aging is only valuable if that experience

292
00:13:11,960 --> 00:13:13,360
translates into wisdom.

293
00:13:13,080 --> 00:13:13,600
Speaker 2: You can use.

294
00:13:14,039 --> 00:13:15,639
Speaker 1: I mean, I think back to when I was thirty.

295
00:13:15,759 --> 00:13:17,759
I thought I knew everything, and now I look back

296
00:13:17,799 --> 00:13:21,639
and realize how much I just completely misunderstood about the world.

297
00:13:21,960 --> 00:13:22,720
Speaker 2: The source is right.

298
00:13:22,799 --> 00:13:24,879
Speaker 3: You might feel brilliant when you're young, but you're often

299
00:13:25,120 --> 00:13:27,679
still an idiot compared to your older self, just because

300
00:13:27,720 --> 00:13:29,399
you lack the data points from lived.

301
00:13:29,159 --> 00:13:31,600
Speaker 1: Experience, and you have to be paying attention to get

302
00:13:31,600 --> 00:13:33,840
those data points. You have to learn actively but also

303
00:13:33,960 --> 00:13:34,799
just passively.

304
00:13:35,000 --> 00:13:38,360
Speaker 3: Open your eyes sometimes and see what's happening, observe the trends,

305
00:13:38,879 --> 00:13:40,320
understand where things are heading.

306
00:13:40,480 --> 00:13:42,960
Speaker 1: And if you see suffering, if you see a flaw

307
00:13:42,960 --> 00:13:46,440
in the system, the mandate comes back, do something about it.

308
00:13:46,559 --> 00:13:49,679
Speaker 3: And that all culminates in this incredibly demanding measure of

309
00:13:49,720 --> 00:13:54,200
a life well lived. The suggested epitaph for a tombstone, which.

310
00:13:54,000 --> 00:13:56,000
Speaker 1: Is not some soft gentle phrase.

311
00:13:56,080 --> 00:13:57,559
Speaker 2: No, it's a command.

312
00:13:58,279 --> 00:14:02,080
Speaker 3: Be ashamed to die unless you've scored some victory for humanity.

313
00:14:02,320 --> 00:14:06,759
Speaker 1: That's a challenge. It demands that your time here resulted

314
00:14:06,840 --> 00:14:10,720
in a net positive, a measurable victory. It's the ultimate

315
00:14:10,759 --> 00:14:12,000
expression of making meaning.

316
00:14:12,600 --> 00:14:14,399
Speaker 3: And if the goal is to score a victory, the

317
00:14:14,480 --> 00:14:16,399
next question is how much time do we have to

318
00:14:16,440 --> 00:14:19,559
do it. This brings us to the obsession with indefinite

319
00:14:19,639 --> 00:14:22,840
life and a term called escape velocity in aging.

320
00:14:23,000 --> 00:14:25,320
Speaker 1: Yeah, I love how they borrow this term. So first,

321
00:14:25,320 --> 00:14:28,480
in astrophysics, escape velocity is the speed you need to

322
00:14:28,480 --> 00:14:31,399
break free from a planet's gravity. For Earth, it's about

323
00:14:31,440 --> 00:14:32,480
seven miles per second.

324
00:14:32,639 --> 00:14:36,320
Speaker 3: Right, So you apply that concept to medicine and human biology.

325
00:14:35,919 --> 00:14:39,080
Speaker 1: Right now, because of medical advances, for every year you're alive,

326
00:14:39,279 --> 00:14:41,519
your life expectancy goes up by about one month.

327
00:14:41,600 --> 00:14:41,919
Speaker 2: Okay.

328
00:14:42,039 --> 00:14:45,679
Speaker 1: The escape velocity of aging is the theoretical point where

329
00:14:45,720 --> 00:14:48,399
science can extend your life by an extra year for

330
00:14:48,600 --> 00:14:50,679
every single year you're still alive.

331
00:14:50,559 --> 00:14:55,279
Speaker 3: So the clock effectively stops. You've outrun death biologically speaking.

332
00:14:54,960 --> 00:14:57,759
Speaker 1: Exactly, and the implications are staggering. Every year you live

333
00:14:57,840 --> 00:15:01,559
you get another year. Eventually, maybe you get two years

334
00:15:01,600 --> 00:15:03,360
of extension for every one year you live.

335
00:15:03,519 --> 00:15:05,519
Speaker 2: Biological immortality basically.

336
00:15:05,519 --> 00:15:08,000
Speaker 1: And while that sounds like the ultimate victory, the analysis

337
00:15:08,039 --> 00:15:11,559
immediately points out the very dark side of this, the

338
00:15:11,600 --> 00:15:13,639
ethical and societal costs.

339
00:15:13,600 --> 00:15:16,720
Speaker 3: Especially if this technology is only for the super rich.

340
00:15:17,120 --> 00:15:21,399
Speaker 1: The first most obvious problem is resource hoarding. The source

341
00:15:21,399 --> 00:15:25,000
suggests that when billionaires chase in definite life, it's driven

342
00:15:25,039 --> 00:15:27,480
by ego and a desire to hold onto.

343
00:15:27,360 --> 00:15:30,159
Speaker 3: Power, and that takes resources away from everything else.

344
00:15:30,200 --> 00:15:30,840
Speaker 2: Think about it.

345
00:15:31,080 --> 00:15:33,679
Speaker 3: If you have the world's most brilliant minds working on

346
00:15:33,759 --> 00:15:36,039
boutique longevity for a few dozen.

347
00:15:35,759 --> 00:15:39,039
Speaker 1: People, they're not working on curing widespread diseases or building

348
00:15:39,080 --> 00:15:43,559
sustainable infrastructure for everyone else. It creates this exclusive scientific.

349
00:15:43,159 --> 00:15:46,679
Speaker 3: Bubble, a permanent divide between the mortals and the near immortals.

350
00:15:47,159 --> 00:15:50,440
But the bigger, maybe more insidious problem, the Source mentions

351
00:15:50,559 --> 00:15:52,320
is civilizational stagnation.

352
00:15:52,759 --> 00:15:54,320
Speaker 1: This is the most chilling part of it for me.

353
00:15:54,799 --> 00:15:57,519
The idea that if people start living forever, they're living

354
00:15:57,559 --> 00:16:01,159
forever in the least useful phase of their life society's progress,

355
00:16:01,279 --> 00:16:05,399
meaning the last years of life are generally the least creative,

356
00:16:05,679 --> 00:16:11,080
least ambitious, and least irreverent. The truly disruptive game changing

357
00:16:11,120 --> 00:16:15,000
ideas almost always come from younger people who haven't accepted

358
00:16:15,000 --> 00:16:16,159
the status quo yet.

359
00:16:16,399 --> 00:16:18,919
Speaker 2: The shark tank analogy they use is perfect for this.

360
00:16:19,279 --> 00:16:22,440
Speaker 1: It is when you see who's bringing the truly fresh

361
00:16:22,519 --> 00:16:25,799
revolutionary ideas to the table. Half of them are thirty and.

362
00:16:25,799 --> 00:16:29,240
Speaker 3: Under because they haven't internalized all the reasons why that's

363
00:16:29,279 --> 00:16:30,720
not how we do things here.

364
00:16:30,919 --> 00:16:33,320
Speaker 1: So if that older generation, the ones with all the

365
00:16:33,399 --> 00:16:37,279
power and resources, lives forever and never lets go, civilization

366
00:16:37,440 --> 00:16:42,759
just stagnates. Creativity relies on irreverence and immortality risks killing

367
00:16:42,799 --> 00:16:44,200
that off completely.

368
00:16:43,799 --> 00:16:45,919
Speaker 3: Which brings us to the challenge of AI and how

369
00:16:45,919 --> 00:16:48,840
it's forcing us to redefine what creativity even is.

370
00:16:49,279 --> 00:16:51,200
Speaker 1: For a long time, AI was just a tool in

371
00:16:51,240 --> 00:16:54,559
the physical sciences. It was helping analyze huge data sets

372
00:16:54,559 --> 00:16:57,120
from telescopes, things like that Nobody's too worried.

373
00:16:57,360 --> 00:16:59,960
Speaker 3: But the spooking Moment, as the source call it, was

374
00:17:00,080 --> 00:17:03,519
when AI started writing term papers and making art. When

375
00:17:03,559 --> 00:17:05,720
it came for the creative fields, that's.

376
00:17:05,559 --> 00:17:08,400
Speaker 1: When we had to start reassessing our own value as creators.

377
00:17:08,680 --> 00:17:11,960
Speaker 3: And the analysis makes this brilliant distinction between what AI

378
00:17:12,039 --> 00:17:16,119
does now, which is aping, and what humans must do next,

379
00:17:16,200 --> 00:17:17,480
which is leaping.

380
00:17:18,119 --> 00:17:19,279
Speaker 1: Explain that if you.

381
00:17:19,319 --> 00:17:22,160
Speaker 3: Ask chat gpt to paint a scene in the style

382
00:17:22,160 --> 00:17:24,079
of Vango, it'll do it perfectly.

383
00:17:24,319 --> 00:17:25,559
Speaker 2: The colors, the swirls.

384
00:17:25,759 --> 00:17:28,880
Speaker 3: It will look exactly like a lost fango. It's perfectly

385
00:17:28,920 --> 00:17:30,039
aping a known style.

386
00:17:30,200 --> 00:17:33,279
Speaker 1: But true human creativity isn't about that. It's about taking

387
00:17:33,759 --> 00:17:36,440
leaps that most people don't even know can be taken.

388
00:17:36,640 --> 00:17:39,440
Speaker 3: Right, so the source says, try asking the AI to

389
00:17:39,440 --> 00:17:41,720
paint a landscape in the style of no artist who

390
00:17:41,720 --> 00:17:44,880
has ever lived the prediction it'll probably suck.

391
00:17:45,279 --> 00:17:48,119
Speaker 1: So AI forces us to get more creative. We have

392
00:17:48,240 --> 00:17:50,839
to abandon the styles and techniques that could be automated

393
00:17:50,880 --> 00:17:52,559
and reach for something genuinely new.

394
00:17:52,680 --> 00:17:54,880
Speaker 2: You have to transcend automation or you're replaced.

395
00:17:55,200 --> 00:17:58,240
Speaker 3: And this whole technological path leads to the ultimate leap,

396
00:17:58,559 --> 00:18:00,640
superintelligence and things like neuralink.

397
00:18:00,960 --> 00:18:04,000
Speaker 1: Elon Musk originally pitched neuralink as a way for us

398
00:18:04,039 --> 00:18:06,680
to keep up with AI, to merge our brains with

399
00:18:06,759 --> 00:18:08,319
computers so we don't get left behind.

400
00:18:08,720 --> 00:18:11,960
Speaker 3: Because the fear is that if a true superintelligence arrives,

401
00:18:12,319 --> 00:18:16,440
it instantly becomes our overlord and we become its We

402
00:18:16,480 --> 00:18:21,599
become its pet, which sounds like a dystopian nightmare. But

403
00:18:21,680 --> 00:18:24,519
the source challenges that fear in a very unsettling way.

404
00:18:25,000 --> 00:18:27,920
Speaker 1: Is being a pet really that scary? I mean pets

405
00:18:27,960 --> 00:18:31,519
are often kept warm, fed happy. You could argue it's

406
00:18:31,519 --> 00:18:33,240
a better life than many humans have now.

407
00:18:33,359 --> 00:18:36,799
Speaker 3: If the superintelligence is benevolent, maybe being its pet is

408
00:18:36,839 --> 00:18:38,759
the best case scenario for our survival.

409
00:18:38,839 --> 00:18:41,880
Speaker 1: But then comes the twist, the chicken analogy.

410
00:18:42,039 --> 00:18:43,000
Speaker 2: This is a rough one.

411
00:18:43,039 --> 00:18:45,960
Speaker 3: The source recalls watching a Nigerian mother chase a chicken,

412
00:18:46,160 --> 00:18:48,200
grab it, and pull its head off to cook for dinner,

413
00:18:48,279 --> 00:18:48,799
and that.

414
00:18:48,759 --> 00:18:50,400
Speaker 1: The analysis says, is the real fear.

415
00:18:50,680 --> 00:18:54,200
Speaker 3: Our survival depends entirely on our utility to the superintelligence.

416
00:18:54,559 --> 00:18:57,079
Not all pets are kept for companionship, Some are just

417
00:18:57,119 --> 00:18:57,680
a resource.

418
00:18:57,799 --> 00:19:00,319
Speaker 1: Are we needed alive or we needed dead? Are we

419
00:19:00,480 --> 00:19:03,200
entertainment or are we just a nuisance?

420
00:19:03,480 --> 00:19:06,240
Speaker 3: Our fate is completely out of our hands at that point.

421
00:19:06,319 --> 00:19:09,680
We're trying so hard to control our destiny with technology,

422
00:19:10,119 --> 00:19:13,519
but that same tech could make our survival dependent on

423
00:19:13,559 --> 00:19:15,759
an alien intelligence's dinner plans.

424
00:19:16,559 --> 00:19:22,000
Speaker 1: Okay, so we've covered simulations immortality AI overlords. Let's bring

425
00:19:22,039 --> 00:19:24,720
this back down to Earth for the last section, or rather,

426
00:19:25,079 --> 00:19:26,720
why we aren't on Mars right.

427
00:19:27,119 --> 00:19:30,319
Speaker 3: The source makes this really bold prediction that the probability

428
00:19:30,359 --> 00:19:32,960
of us going to another planet in our lifetime is

429
00:19:33,039 --> 00:19:35,240
basically zero, and this flies.

430
00:19:34,920 --> 00:19:38,000
Speaker 1: In the face of everything we hear from private space companies. Yeah,

431
00:19:38,039 --> 00:19:43,119
but the argument is so cynical and historically sound.

432
00:19:43,240 --> 00:19:47,079
Speaker 3: Dak humanity only does these massive, expensive, large scale projects

433
00:19:47,160 --> 00:19:49,359
if there is a clear geopolitical reason.

434
00:19:49,559 --> 00:19:51,960
Speaker 1: It has to be about economics or defense. It's never

435
00:19:52,119 --> 00:19:53,519
just because it's the next cool thing to do.

436
00:19:53,759 --> 00:19:56,200
Speaker 3: And the perfect example, the one that proves the role,

437
00:19:56,359 --> 00:19:58,119
is why we went to the Moon in the first place.

438
00:19:58,240 --> 00:19:59,559
Speaker 1: It wasn't for science, not at all.

439
00:19:59,599 --> 00:20:02,119
Speaker 3: It was to beat the Russians. The chronology is everything.

440
00:20:02,240 --> 00:20:05,279
April nineteen sixty one, eury gagarn orbits the Earth, a

441
00:20:05,400 --> 00:20:06,720
huge win for the Soviets.

442
00:20:07,119 --> 00:20:11,599
Speaker 1: Six weeks later, President Kennedy goes before Congress. At that point,

443
00:20:11,720 --> 00:20:14,599
the US can't even reliably launch a person into orbit

444
00:20:14,680 --> 00:20:16,559
without the rocket exploiting.

445
00:20:16,359 --> 00:20:19,000
Speaker 3: And yet he stands up and delivers what the source

446
00:20:19,079 --> 00:20:22,000
calls a battle cry against communism.

447
00:20:22,640 --> 00:20:23,920
Speaker 2: The mission wasn't science.

448
00:20:24,240 --> 00:20:26,359
Speaker 3: It was showing the world that the path of freedom

449
00:20:26,759 --> 00:20:28,440
was better than the path of tyranny.

450
00:20:29,039 --> 00:20:32,359
Speaker 1: The check that Congress wrote for Apollo was signed out

451
00:20:32,359 --> 00:20:36,599
of fear and a need for defense, not curiosity.

452
00:20:36,480 --> 00:20:38,960
Speaker 3: The source argues, and I think history backs this up

453
00:20:39,000 --> 00:20:42,440
that governments just don't spend scads of money just because

454
00:20:42,440 --> 00:20:44,200
it was a cool thing to do. There has to

455
00:20:44,240 --> 00:20:46,920
be a rivalry or a dire economic need.

456
00:20:47,119 --> 00:20:49,359
Speaker 1: And the most tragic proof of this is what happened

457
00:20:49,400 --> 00:20:52,079
after we won the race, the cancelation of Apollo.

458
00:20:52,279 --> 00:20:54,480
Speaker 3: We got to the Moon, we looked over our shoulder

459
00:20:54,519 --> 00:20:56,119
and the Russians weren't in the race anymore.

460
00:20:56,160 --> 00:20:57,319
Speaker 2: They'd basically given up.

461
00:20:57,480 --> 00:20:59,839
Speaker 1: And the second that geopolitical reason vanished, so.

462
00:21:00,119 --> 00:21:04,079
Speaker 3: The money, the political will, everything, the Apollo program was canceled.

463
00:21:04,279 --> 00:21:06,640
Speaker 2: We haven't been back to the Moon in over fifty years.

464
00:21:06,720 --> 00:21:09,400
Speaker 1: And the source points out that Apollo eighteen was fully built,

465
00:21:09,640 --> 00:21:12,400
it was flight ready, sitting there waiting to go.

466
00:21:12,599 --> 00:21:15,839
Speaker 3: And now it's a tourist attraction in a museum. We

467
00:21:15,880 --> 00:21:19,119
didn't go to Mars because there was no geopolitical rival

468
00:21:19,160 --> 00:21:22,880
to beat. There no economic or defense reason to justify

469
00:21:22,960 --> 00:21:24,240
the insane costs.

470
00:21:24,279 --> 00:21:27,920
Speaker 1: This all ties into a larger idea, the secularization of ambition.

471
00:21:28,160 --> 00:21:31,119
Speaker 3: In the past, you could get massive projects done for

472
00:21:31,200 --> 00:21:32,759
the glory of God and royalty.

473
00:21:33,119 --> 00:21:34,559
Speaker 2: You could build pyramids.

474
00:21:34,200 --> 00:21:36,839
Speaker 3: Or cathedrals because the motivation was metaphysical.

475
00:21:37,000 --> 00:21:39,680
Speaker 1: But those drivers don't work anymore. You can't convince a

476
00:21:39,720 --> 00:21:43,359
modern democracy to spend trillions for the abstract glory of

477
00:21:43,400 --> 00:21:44,400
a leader or a god.

478
00:21:44,680 --> 00:21:48,359
Speaker 3: So today ambition has to be secular, and for that

479
00:21:48,559 --> 00:21:51,200
you need one of two things to mobilize.

480
00:21:50,640 --> 00:21:52,480
Speaker 1: That kind of capital, money or its war.

481
00:21:53,240 --> 00:21:56,240
Speaker 3: Until going to Mars is about getting some vital resource

482
00:21:56,319 --> 00:21:58,960
we need to survive, or about beating a rival nation

483
00:21:59,079 --> 00:22:02,119
there for military advantage, the check just won't be written.

484
00:22:02,279 --> 00:22:04,960
Speaker 1: It's pretty depressing take on what drives us that our

485
00:22:05,000 --> 00:22:08,319
greatest achievements come from our deepest fears and rivalries, not

486
00:22:08,400 --> 00:22:10,359
our highest hopes. It is so we've gone on quite

487
00:22:10,400 --> 00:22:13,720
a journey here. We started by questioning our whole reality,

488
00:22:14,279 --> 00:22:17,599
the idea we're just characters in a simulation facing down

489
00:22:17,640 --> 00:22:20,039
Godzilla events created by a board programmer.

490
00:22:20,119 --> 00:22:23,200
Speaker 3: Then we turn that into a practical mission, no matter what,

491
00:22:23,400 --> 00:22:27,039
we have to actively make meaning get wiser, and try

492
00:22:27,079 --> 00:22:29,359
to score a victory for humanity.

493
00:22:29,519 --> 00:22:32,240
Speaker 1: We wrestled with the limits of our ambition, the trap

494
00:22:32,279 --> 00:22:35,880
of immortality leading to stagnation and the rise of AI

495
00:22:36,160 --> 00:22:39,680
forcing us to be more creative while also maybe positioning

496
00:22:39,720 --> 00:22:42,880
itself as our utilitarian.

497
00:22:42,319 --> 00:22:46,279
Speaker 3: Overlords, and we landed on the cold hard logic of history,

498
00:22:46,440 --> 00:22:50,160
realizing our greatest achievement, going to the Moon, wasn't about glory,

499
00:22:50,640 --> 00:22:54,519
but about the primal urge of geopolitical rivalry.

500
00:22:54,079 --> 00:22:56,319
Speaker 1: The same rivalry that's missing today and keeping.

501
00:22:56,200 --> 00:22:58,599
Speaker 3: Us stuck on Earth, and that tension is still there,

502
00:22:58,720 --> 00:23:01,960
isn't it. We strive for individual meaning and free will

503
00:23:02,400 --> 00:23:05,400
even while all this evidence suggests we're just puppets constrained

504
00:23:05,400 --> 00:23:08,680
by a programmer or by the simple math of global competition.

505
00:23:08,880 --> 00:23:11,519
Speaker 1: It leaves you with this huge existential challenge. We want

506
00:23:11,519 --> 00:23:13,240
to believe we're in charge of our own story, but

507
00:23:13,279 --> 00:23:15,920
maybe these massive external forces are the ones really steering

508
00:23:15,920 --> 00:23:16,319
the ship.

509
00:23:16,680 --> 00:23:18,839
Speaker 3: So we'll leave you with a thought that comes directly

510
00:23:18,880 --> 00:23:24,200
from all this. The source suggests that big disasters, pandemics, wars,

511
00:23:24,559 --> 00:23:28,160
political shocks are just the programmer stirring the pot.

512
00:23:28,319 --> 00:23:30,720
Speaker 1: So here's the question for you to think about. If

513
00:23:30,759 --> 00:23:33,799
you accepted that as true. Does knowing your suffering might

514
00:23:33,920 --> 00:23:37,200
just be entertainment? Does that make you feel more compelled

515
00:23:37,240 --> 00:23:40,240
to score a victory for humanity or does it make

516
00:23:40,279 --> 00:23:42,880
you feel so powerless that you just give up trying?

517
00:23:43,119 --> 00:23:45,319
Speaker 2: That really is the ultimate choice, isn't it It?

518
00:23:45,359 --> 00:23:48,160
Speaker 1: Is Think about it until next time. Keep following the

519
00:23:48,160 --> 00:23:49,519
thrilling threads of knowledge,