Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As o'clock strikes thirteen, It's Friday, the twelfth of September,
Speaker 2: Year of Our Lord, twenty twenty five. Well, today we're
Speaker 2: going to begin by taking a look at potential wars
Speaker 2: and their outcome. Yes, as disturbing as it is to
Speaker 2: see an individual assassinated, murdered and the consequences of that
Speaker 2: watching it happen, think about this magnified by hundreds, thousands,
Speaker 2: tens of thousands of times. That's what war is. You
Speaker 2: don't see every single one of the incidents, and you
Speaker 2: don't have a connection or history of kind of knowing
Speaker 2: that person, as people did with Charlie Kirk. But it
Speaker 2: is real, nevertheless, and governments think that they have the
Speaker 2: right to do that at any given time. So we're
Speaker 2: going to take a look at potential consequences of a
Speaker 2: China war as well as Venezuela. We have some interesting
Speaker 2: revelations about the judge who released this fourteen time loser
Speaker 2: who murdered that young woman on the train as well.
Speaker 2: But we will also take a look at the amazing
Speaker 2: reactions of people to the Charlie Kirk. We'll be right back.
Speaker 3: Stay with.
Speaker 4: Welcome to the show today on this Friday, folks, hope
Speaker 4: you're all doing well. I'm gonna give you the headlines
Speaker 4: that we're gonna be going through now. We're going to
Speaker 4: take a look at general news. Trump calls his drone
Speaker 4: strike on an alleged drug boat self defense. It looks
Speaker 4: more like murder. How China could bring war with Taiwan
Speaker 4: to the US. It wouldn't be just over there, that's
Speaker 4: what they're saying. Judge who freed Charlotte killer didn't even
Speaker 4: go to law school or pass the bar. Surprise, surprise,
Speaker 4: Apparently I'm qualified to be a judge. Actually, probably cracker
Speaker 4: barrel Sir Patron's day, old biscuits and microwaved meat loaf
Speaker 4: amid ill fated rebrand. Youm delicious, Branson. Flames is the
Speaker 4: block everything protest movement sweeps the country. Yes, well, France
Speaker 4: burns itself down about once a year.
Speaker 2: Soaris is Burning was one of the movies that they
Speaker 2: had about World War Two when as.
Speaker 4: He kids burning, Paris is burning, and Paris is burning.
Speaker 2: That's true now, but for very different reasons. Well, Trump
Speaker 2: calls his drone strike and alleged self defense. That looks
Speaker 2: like murder. And this is from Reason magazine. And these
Speaker 2: are the assessments of people who were part of the
Speaker 2: legal structure of the Department of Defense, even people who
Speaker 2: were in his own administration. Previously last week, he ordered
Speaker 2: a drone strike that sank a speedboat in the Caribbean,
Speaker 2: killing all eleven people on board. He described targets as
Speaker 2: members of Venezuelan gang. I just call him the Trendyes,
Speaker 2: it's trendy, ragua whatever. But they were at sea and
Speaker 2: international waters, transporting illegal narcotics headed to the United States,
Speaker 2: he said. Although the men could have been intercepted and
Speaker 2: arrested Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who told reporters that
Speaker 2: the President decided their summary execution was appropriate as a
Speaker 2: deterrent to drug trafficking, and so did hegseth and they
Speaker 2: boasted that this isn't the last time that'll happen. They
Speaker 2: didn't see it as mistake, but as a new precedent
Speaker 2: of precedent Trump. The New York Times cited unnamed American
Speaker 2: officials familiar with the matter. So the boat appeared to
Speaker 2: have turned around before the attack. Started because the people
Speaker 2: on board had apparently spotted a military aircraft stalking it,
Speaker 2: and they will say, well, see it shows that they
Speaker 2: were guilty. I don't know. It seems to me, especially
Speaker 2: considering the marks of President Trump, that people might look
Speaker 2: at the shoot first crazy Americans and try to avoid
Speaker 2: though I certainly would.
Speaker 5: Who would run from a military gunship if they aren't guilty?
Speaker 2: That's right everybody now, And he's boasting about that, he said,
Speaker 2: Trump said, I think maybe even fishermen will have a problem,
Speaker 2: that might think twice about going out. Is that really
Speaker 2: the way that things should be? The attack crossed a
Speaker 2: fundamental line in the Department of Defense that is resolutely
Speaker 2: committed to upholding for many decades, namely that accept, in
Speaker 2: rare and extreme circumstances that are not present here, the
Speaker 2: military must not use lethal force against civilians, even if
Speaker 2: they are alleged or even known to be violating the law.
Speaker 2: So Georgetown law professor Marty Letterman. Letterman adds that the
Speaker 2: September second drone strike appears to have violated the Executive
Speaker 2: Order prohibiting assassination. Well wait a minute, Trump assassinated Solomony.
Speaker 2: He didn't have a problem with that and arguably qualifies
Speaker 2: as murder under federal law in the Uniform Code of
Speaker 2: Criminal Justice. I know that everybody wants to talk about
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk, and we will follow up with the things
Speaker 2: that are happening with that. It's amazing to me, it's
Speaker 2: almost entirely the news that's been taking up with it.
Speaker 2: And it is a tragedy, and it is not only
Speaker 2: a personal tragedy, but it's a tragedy that we have
Speaker 2: this culture, this cold war of hate now, especially between
Speaker 2: the two sides, but especially on the left. But we
Speaker 2: see this mirrored on both sides where people want to
Speaker 2: just destroy the other side or punish or lock up
Speaker 2: the other side because of political beliefs. And certainly there
Speaker 2: are dangerous people, and they're dangerous people once we've seen
Speaker 2: on both sides of the political aisle. But to just
Speaker 2: do a blanket condemnation of people, understand that it is
Speaker 2: not speech that is hate, it is censorship that is hate,
Speaker 2: and eventually winds up that hate eventually winds up with murdering.
Speaker 2: You know, Jesus is right when he told us you've
Speaker 2: heard thou shalt not kill, But he says, if you
Speaker 2: have hate, in your heart and anger in your heart.
Speaker 2: That is essentially murder, because that's ultimately where it leads.
Speaker 2: And we are seeing that in our society now. Though
Speaker 2: we decided that we didn't really care as a society
Speaker 2: what Jesus had to say, the truth of it is
Speaker 2: being demonstrated to us now. And the reality is is
Speaker 2: that when you look at a government that doesn't have
Speaker 2: to go through legal due process, that is the most
Speaker 2: dangerous thing that you can have. That is the largest
Speaker 2: terrorist and most dangerous terrorist gang that you can never have,
Speaker 2: is a government that has divorced itself from the rule
Speaker 2: of law, thereby divorcing itself from due process. I mentioned
Speaker 2: when this happened, I compared it immediately to what do Tarte,
Speaker 2: the authoritarian dictator of the Philippines, did when he told
Speaker 2: the police, if you see somebody that you think is
Speaker 2: dealing drugs and Philippines, we're going to end this. Just
Speaker 2: shoot them on site. And they killed twelve thousand people.
Speaker 2: And so when you look at this, this is compounded
Speaker 2: the whole issue that I've had for a very long
Speaker 2: time of how the United States, as you want to
Speaker 2: talk about nazis, what was it that people were concerned
Speaker 2: about with the nazis the fact that they started the war, right,
Speaker 2: they were the ones who invaded their neighbors and so forth.
Speaker 2: Everybody understands that's morally wrong. We don't anymore.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 2: It was understood that when Pearl Harbor was bombed, regardless
Speaker 2: of what FDR had done to stand aside and stand
Speaker 2: down and to keep people from knowing about it and
Speaker 2: setting that up, and his involvement prior to that in
Speaker 2: terms of taking sides in the war, regardless of all that,
Speaker 2: if you do an attack without declaring war, that was infamy,
Speaker 2: and it still is infamy. The principle has not changed.
Speaker 2: Even if we have changed or we no longer have principles,
Speaker 2: that is still the principle. And so what Trump is
Speaker 2: doing here is reprehensible. A New York University law professor
Speaker 2: Ryan Goodman, former Defense Department lawyer, says it's difficult to
Speaker 2: imagine how lawyers and signed the Pentagon could have arrived
Speaker 2: at a conclusion that this was legal, rather than the
Speaker 2: very definition of murder under international law rules that the
Speaker 2: Department Offense has long accepted. Well, yes, yeah, this is
Speaker 2: a question that Trump.
Speaker 6: Well, I would say they're going to be in trouble.
Speaker 6: We'll let them know about that.
Speaker 3: We heard that happen, but it wasn't really over, not
Speaker 3: like they described.
Speaker 1: But I would say general, if.
Speaker 3: They do that, you have a choice of doing anything
Speaker 3: you want.
Speaker 7: Okay, if they fly in a dangerous position, I would
Speaker 7: say that you can, you or your captains can make
Speaker 7: the decision as to what they want to do.
Speaker 1: Didn't go over say it?
Speaker 2: How close did they get?
Speaker 7: He said the Well, I don't want to talk about that,
Speaker 7: but if they do put us in a dangerous position.
Speaker 6: Let's be shut down. Thank you very much, everybody. So
Speaker 6: we're going to now cover the G twenty.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So what he was responding to there was the
Speaker 2: he'd made a statement that there had been some Venezuelan
Speaker 2: planes that had flown close to the ships that were there,
Speaker 2: and if they perceived them be a threat, they could
Speaker 2: shoot them down. And of course that's not really anything
Speaker 2: that is different or unusual. Yes, if you perceive a threat,
Speaker 2: you can defend yourself. These moral issues for governments are
Speaker 2: no different than the moral issues that we have as individuals.
Speaker 2: If somebody has broken into your house, if they are
Speaker 2: coming at you, you are allowed to defend yourself even
Speaker 2: to kill them, but not if you see them and
Speaker 2: suspect them of doing something in your yard you don't
Speaker 2: have to do, or if they're running from you, and
Speaker 2: that's the other issue. As this boat turned away, then
Speaker 2: that makes it even more complicated because now they are
Speaker 2: certainly no threat to the US military. They've turned away,
Speaker 2: and they still shot them. As Trump told it, the
Speaker 2: attack was justified because the Trendees, a designated foreign terrorist
Speaker 2: organization operating under the control he said of Maduro, was
Speaker 2: responsible for mass murdered, drug trafficking, sex trafficking, and acts
Speaker 2: of violence and terror across the United States in the
Speaker 2: Western hemisphere. So his own government, as a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: disputes the fact that the gang is under the control
Speaker 2: of Maduro. But I'll just say, even if somebody is
Speaker 2: known as a criminal, you can see them in the
Speaker 2: act of the crime. It has always been the requirement
Speaker 2: of government that you apprehend them. If we want to
Speaker 2: set up a death penalty for these cartel gangs, then
Speaker 2: that still means that they're not shot on site on
Speaker 2: the street because of what that could entail. That means
Speaker 2: they still get arrested, whether it's by the police or
Speaker 2: by the military and you seize the property that's there.
Speaker 2: As I said, the very same time this is happening,
Speaker 2: you had the Coastguard stopping ships and they are addicting
Speaker 2: a great deal of drugs that are coming into the
Speaker 2: United States. But they don't execute everybody on board. Even
Speaker 2: if they stop the ship and prove that it has
Speaker 2: drugs on it, they're not allowed to execute everybody. You're
Speaker 2: still bringing back for due process. And if the government
Speaker 2: wants to make a capital offense selling drugs or delivering drugs,
Speaker 2: that's a different issue that needs to be debated. That
Speaker 2: is where we are now, though, because we never debated
Speaker 2: making drugs illegal in the first place. When they made
Speaker 2: alcohol illegal a prohibition, we had the eighteenth Amendment to
Speaker 2: the Constitution. There's not even any constitutional authority for the
Speaker 2: drug war, let alone to kill people without any due
Speaker 2: process or even proving that they are involved with the
Speaker 2: drug trade. Drug cartels have wrought devastating consequences on American
Speaker 2: communities for decades, he said. No, I would say that
Speaker 2: the drug cartels were created by the drug war, and
Speaker 2: the drug war created by the UN. We're now out
Speaker 2: there murdering people without any proof to enforce a UN agenda.
Speaker 2: Trump said in a September fourth letter to Congress, we
Speaker 2: have now reached a critical point where we must meet
Speaker 2: this threat to our citizens and our most vital national
Speaker 2: interests with the US military force in self defense. So
Speaker 2: he's claiming that we can go on offense and self defense.
Speaker 2: That's essentially what the Japanese were saying with Pearl Harbor.
Speaker 2: You know, we got to kill them before they kill us.
Speaker 2: Last week, Trump joked about potential for deadly heirs. He said,
Speaker 2: I think anybody that saw that is going to say,
Speaker 2: I'll take a pass. I don't even know about fishermen.
Speaker 2: They may say, I'm not going to get on the boat.
Speaker 2: I'm not going to take a chance. This is the
Speaker 2: This is the ranting of somebody who is nothing other
Speaker 2: than a thug. He's proud of what he did. He's
Speaker 2: proud of the fact that fishermen are going to be
Speaker 2: afraid to get into their boats. They're afraid of me, right,
Speaker 2: this is what disgusted me so much.
Speaker 5: But wait a minute, I thought everyone was okay with
Speaker 5: US military boats unless they were drug dealers. Surely the
Speaker 5: fishermen wouldn't run away if that, if they run. That
Speaker 5: means they're drug dealers.
Speaker 2: That's right. So I'll just have to go on shore
Speaker 2: and kill them if they won't get into boats for
Speaker 2: us to kill them. That's what they really want. They
Speaker 2: want an excuse. They got a chip on their shoulder.
Speaker 2: They want an excuse to invade Venezuela and it will
Speaker 2: be mass carnage. Just just look at you know how
Speaker 2: disturbing the shot of taken on Kirk was, Charlie Kirk,
Speaker 2: And think about that. That's the reality of war. Many times,
Speaker 2: it's even worse than that. Sometimes somebody doesn't die immediately,
Speaker 2: but they die in agony, in pain. That's usually the case.
Speaker 2: Are we going to inflict that for what purpose? So
Speaker 2: that Trump can boast about what a strong man he is.
Speaker 2: It's disgusting. He's no different than the people that they
Speaker 2: have claimed with their enemies. Member. When George H. W.
Speaker 2: Bush called Manuel Noriegay a strong man, nor Ye Gay,
Speaker 2: you know, well, we've got a strong man in the
Speaker 2: White House, now, don't we. That's what these strong men do.
Speaker 2: Killing cartel members who poison our fellow citizens is the
Speaker 2: highest and the best use of our military, said JD. Vance.
Speaker 2: I got to say I would never support this guy ever,
Speaker 2: based on that statement alone. There's many other reasons not
Speaker 2: to support him, concerning his connections with the technocracy, his
Speaker 2: connections with MR and a self amplifying technology, and the
Speaker 2: rest of this stuff, but that in and of itself
Speaker 2: shows that he is not qualified to be president ever. Ever,
Speaker 2: and Ran Paul called him out on it. A commentator observed,
Speaker 2: the killing citizens of another nation who are civilians without
Speaker 2: any due process is called a war crime, and he says,
Speaker 2: I don't give a blank what you call it. Remember
Speaker 2: when conservatives, do you remember when Al Gore made the statement,
Speaker 2: there's no controlling legal authority here. Everybody had a big
Speaker 2: issue with that. Everybody had a big issue when Obama
Speaker 2: assassinated using a drone, assassinated someone who was an American
Speaker 2: citizen technically, even if not in reality, in a foreign country,
Speaker 2: said oh, you can just select anybody, even an American citizen,
Speaker 2: and kill them without any due process. Because of the
Speaker 2: principle involved. It wasn't that the guy was a good guy.
Speaker 2: He might have very well have been a terrorist. But
Speaker 2: even at that time, conservatives were concerned because when it
Speaker 2: was not somebody that was a part of their party,
Speaker 2: when it's a Democrat like al Gore or Obama, their
Speaker 2: thought process is not clouded by partisan loyalty. They can
Speaker 2: look at the principles involved, and the principles are the
Speaker 2: same here. So Rampaul responded to JdE events. As I
Speaker 2: pointed out last week, what a despicable, thoughtless sentiment it
Speaker 2: is to glorify killing someone without a trial. And that's
Speaker 2: what we're seeing from both Trump and jd Events. It
Speaker 2: is sickening and thoughtless. Trump's justification for that shortcut is perverse,
Speaker 2: says Reason. Although he describes the act as an act
Speaker 2: of self defense, he does not claim that the alleged
Speaker 2: drug traffickers were engaged in a literal attack on the
Speaker 2: United States. To accept Trump's framing, you have to accept
Speaker 2: the premise that transporting illegal drugs is tannamount to violent aggression,
Speaker 2: and of course, to the left, speech is tannamount to
Speaker 2: violent aggression as well. You know, people always try to
Speaker 2: make that leap to justify what they really want to do.
Speaker 2: That would be consistent with Trump's often expressed desire to
Speaker 2: kill drug dealers, but it is not consistent with the
Speaker 2: way that laws or ordinarily enforced. And when I see
Speaker 2: that I always want to put laws, drug laws and
Speaker 2: quotes air quotes, because they can't be laws if they
Speaker 2: violate the Constitution, and clearly they do. We have two
Speaker 2: constitutional amendments that made it clear. The eighteenth Amendment created
Speaker 2: alcohol prohbiation that twenty first ended it. We have two
Speaker 2: amendments to the Constitution that show that according to the
Speaker 2: clear reading of the Constitution ninth and tenth Amendment, they
Speaker 2: cannot assume the power to ban anything. They need a
Speaker 2: constitutional amendment to ban anything like that. So, in the
Speaker 2: absence of violent resistance, a police officer who decided to
Speaker 2: shoot a drug suspect dead rather than take them into
Speaker 2: custody would be guilty of murder. Morally speaking, the situation
Speaker 2: is no different. That much is clear, even without considering
Speaker 2: the fundamental injustice of criminalizing conduct that does violence to
Speaker 2: no one's rights, such as exchange of drugs for money.
Speaker 2: And again this is a reason so they they do
Speaker 2: not support the drug war at all. Again making a distinction,
Speaker 2: as Lyceendus Spooner did, between crime and vice, that vice
Speaker 2: is something that somebody is involved in that they do voluntarily.
Speaker 2: That's what makes it so difficult to shut down vice,
Speaker 2: and by that we mean things like prostitution, drug dealing,
Speaker 2: all these other things which are really fundamentally moral issues.
Speaker 2: We have two people that are willing to engage in
Speaker 2: this process. Even if it is something that is credibly harmful,
Speaker 2: even suicidal, you're not going to stop it by enacting laws.
Speaker 2: So the trendy designation as a terrorist organization does not
Speaker 2: affect this analysis. Trump administration officials admit that they could
Speaker 2: have interdicted the boat and detained the people on board,
Speaker 2: notes George Mason, law professor Ilia Summan. They did not
Speaker 2: pose any imminent threat of violence. They were not combatants
Speaker 2: in any war against the US. Calling them narco terrorists
Speaker 2: does not change these obvious facts as reasons. Matthew Petty observes,
Speaker 2: the unprovoked attack on a boat allegedly carrying drugs shows
Speaker 2: how the label of terrorism makes everyone killable, and that's
Speaker 2: really what we're talking about the aftermath of nine to eleven,
Speaker 2: the idea that you're either with us or you're a terrorist.
Speaker 2: It was a war on terrorism. It was a war
Speaker 2: on a tactic not necessarily identifying the people who did this,
Speaker 2: and of course they tried to pretend that it was
Speaker 2: Afghanistan and men in caves who did this a ludicrous idea.
Speaker 2: The rhetorical license to kill does not amount to legal justification.
Speaker 2: The State Department designation merely triggers the government's ability to
Speaker 2: implement asset controls and other economic sanctions under the International
Speaker 2: Emergency Economic Powers Act. So what they're saying is you
Speaker 2: label somebody a terrorists, then what that does is that
Speaker 2: triggers asset control and economic sanctions and things like that.
Speaker 2: Just like when Trump made the emergency decoration about the
Speaker 2: so called pandemic, it was to release money. So much
Speaker 2: of this stuff always has to do with money, doesn't it.
Speaker 2: It has nothing to do with authorizing Defense Department to
Speaker 2: engage in targeted killings, which is why the US military
Speaker 2: doesn't go round killing members of all designated foreign terrorist organizations.
Speaker 2: Nor can Trump cite any other statute that transforms murder
Speaker 2: into self defense in this context. Instead, he is relying
Speaker 2: on his quote constitutional authority as commander in chief and
Speaker 2: chief executive to use deadly force against civilians he perceives
Speaker 2: as a threat to national security and foreign policy interests,
Speaker 2: and again engaging in assassination of foreign leaders and all
Speaker 2: the rest of this stuff he needs to be impeached.
Speaker 2: They will never impeach him for the stuff that he
Speaker 2: should be impeached for. And the impeachment for nonsense charges,
Speaker 2: not violations of the constitution, those types of things that
Speaker 2: were done. Essentially, we are something that's giving him a
Speaker 2: pass when it comes to this stuff. People are so
Speaker 2: used to seeing bogus charges brought against Trump that they
Speaker 2: just roll their eyes when impeachment is mentioned. But if
Speaker 2: ever there was a president in my lifetime that deserves
Speaker 2: to be impeached, it's Donald Trump. Since Trump frequently describes
Speaker 2: a legal immigration as an invasion, might he decide that
Speaker 2: he has the authority to order the summary execution of
Speaker 2: people trying to enter the country without permission. Scott Anderson,
Speaker 2: Senior fellow of the National Security Law Program at Columbia
Speaker 2: Law School, says many of the legal arguments that Trump
Speaker 2: administration has advanced in relation to narcotics trafficking might also
Speaker 2: extend to other for far more troubling uses of force
Speaker 2: that certain administration officials have reportedly raised, For example, the
Speaker 2: use of lethal force against unlawful migrants whose transport is
Speaker 2: facilitated by the trendy Kang White House spokesperson Anna Kelly
Speaker 2: claims Trump quote acted in line with the laws of
Speaker 2: armed conflict to protect our country from evil narco terrorists
Speaker 2: trying to poison our homeland. Nothing can be further from
Speaker 2: the truth. We have a group of sycophants in the
Speaker 2: Trump administration that will openly bowlface lie to the American
Speaker 2: public to support their lying leader. It's amazing to me,
Speaker 2: and that includes people like Carol Lying Lovett and Squeaker
Speaker 2: Mouse Johnson. But even if you accept the specious equation
Speaker 2: of drug smuggling and armed agression, it seems relevant that
Speaker 2: the alleged drug boat reportedly was running back when the
Speaker 2: drone strike was launched. If someone is treating it retreating,
Speaker 2: where is the imminent threat? Says Rear Admiral Donald Guter,
Speaker 2: formerly the top judge advocate for the Navy, when he
Speaker 2: was asked in an interview with New York Times, where
Speaker 2: is the quote self defense? They're gone. That's gone if
Speaker 2: that ever existed, and I don't think that it ever did.
Speaker 2: Rear Admiral James McPherson, who served in the same position
Speaker 2: as Gouter, was also General Counsel to the Army during
Speaker 2: the first Trump administration, and he was similarly skeptical. I
Speaker 2: would be interested if they could come up with a
Speaker 2: legal basis for what they did. If, in fact, you
Speaker 2: can fashion a legal argument that says these people were
Speaker 2: getting ready to attack the US through the introduction of
Speaker 2: cocaine or whatever. If they turned back, then that that
Speaker 2: threat has gone away. He said, it's a terrible precedent,
Speaker 2: said the Jeffrey corn formerly the Army Chief Advisor on the.
Speaker 1: Law of War.
Speaker 2: He said, we have crossed a line here. And I agree.
Speaker 2: You've got a lot of people saying that we have
Speaker 2: crossed the line, and I think we have with a
Speaker 2: shooting of Charlie Kirk. But this is a line that
Speaker 2: has been crossed and it is very dangerous. It's what
Speaker 2: I always call him, Precedent Trump, not President Trump. He
Speaker 2: is always about crossing rubicons left and right. So when
Speaker 2: we look at this, how would a Chinese war with Taiwan?
Speaker 2: Would that come to American soil? This is a question
Speaker 2: asked by the Daily Signal, which is actually part of
Speaker 2: the Heritage Foundation, a conservative organization, And so they're kind
Speaker 2: of wargaming, you know, what would happen, And they don't
Speaker 2: even get a tiny fraction of it. As we always say,
Speaker 2: you know, when you're talking about a war, whether it's
Speaker 2: a civil war or foreign war, everybody has a cavalier attitude.
Speaker 2: This is going to be a piece of case for
Speaker 2: our side. If they didn't have that attitude, if they
Speaker 2: thought they were going to lose, they wouldn't get into
Speaker 2: the war, right If they cared about the cost to
Speaker 2: their own military or to civilians, they wouldn't enter the war.
Speaker 2: So it's based on hubrists, arrogance, pride, and disregard for
Speaker 2: human life. That's what we always see with these wars.
Speaker 2: And so in this article they say that think about
Speaker 2: all the different things that China could do. They could
Speaker 2: start wildfires all over the place. For example, they could
Speaker 2: attack our infrastructure, which is incredibly vulnerable. As a matter
Speaker 2: of fact, we'll be talking to Jack Lawson today in
Speaker 2: the third hour about things like that, and about some
Speaker 2: op ed pieces that he put out about about the
Speaker 2: shootings that were happening, not about Charlie Kirk, but about
Speaker 2: the school shootings that were happening. And of course there
Speaker 2: was another school shooting happening that happened the day that
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk was killed, but it was completely swamped with
Speaker 2: the coverage of Charlie Kirks, so nobody even talked about that.
Speaker 2: But look at how the you know, anybody who wanted
Speaker 2: to attack the US today with asymmetric warfare. We have
Speaker 2: such a vulnerable supply chain. And that was the first
Speaker 2: time I talked to Jack Lawson. It was about the
Speaker 2: vulnerability of the supply chain and why that showed a
Speaker 2: need to prepare for your food and other things like that.
Speaker 2: That's what his book is about, and we saw that
Speaker 2: in spades in twenty twenty. We have a long, complicated,
Speaker 2: just in time supply chain that is easily disrupted, especially
Speaker 2: if somebody wanted to do it on purpose. Just look
Speaker 2: at what these people did, arguably with stupidity. Although I
Speaker 2: believe that there was malice involved in twenty twenty with
Speaker 2: the pandemic lockdowns, I don't think it was simply stupidity.
Speaker 2: I think it was malice. But imagine if it was
Speaker 2: a foreign power like China and with our poorest they
Speaker 2: could easily do all of this stuff. They've already got
Speaker 2: enough people in here to do that. So when you
Speaker 2: look at how vital Taiwan is to the electronics industry,
Speaker 2: for example, whether or not Taiwan followed a scorch druss
Speaker 2: policy and destroyed the factories to keep them from falling
Speaker 2: into Chinese hands, or whether or not they did fall
Speaker 2: into Chinese hands. Either way, we'd be cut off from
Speaker 2: the major supplies of top of the line stay the
Speaker 2: art semicductor development that is being done manufactured in Taiwan
Speaker 2: now and have a devastating long term effect on both
Speaker 2: consumer goods as well as military goods in the United States.
Speaker 2: But they could attack our supply chain in any number
Speaker 2: of ways. And so that's really kind of what they're
Speaker 2: wargaming here. And that's over and above things like hypersonic missiles,
Speaker 2: which they don't even get into in this article, the
Speaker 2: primary tools of war, or when you look at things
Speaker 2: like again, they're not paying attention to the change into
Speaker 2: autonomous killing machines like drones and things like that. So
Speaker 2: there's a lot of weapons that have been developed that
Speaker 2: we've not seen deployed in more conventional warfare. But it's
Speaker 2: the asymmetric attacks on America that could easily be the
Speaker 2: turning point with all this stuff. She reportedly told Trump
Speaker 2: that he won't invade Taiwan, while Trump is present, but
Speaker 2: it's also said to have told his military to be
Speaker 2: ready to seize Taiwan by twenty twenty seven. So he's
Speaker 2: still going to do it in Trump's administration unless he
Speaker 2: thinks that Trump will die by twenty twenty seven. Cyber
Speaker 2: attacks and attacks on the infrastructure, even disease, they say
Speaker 2: in this. But again that is going back to the
Speaker 2: fake narrative of the China flu, which I don't agree
Speaker 2: with that at all. That's one of the things that
Speaker 2: the leftist pressed when they said controversial things that Charlie
Speaker 2: Kirk said, and they go back to the pandemic, and
Speaker 2: I thought, yeah, that's interesting. What do you say about
Speaker 2: the pandemic. Well, he called it a the China flu.
Speaker 2: B he said he could come in through the poorest
Speaker 2: borders and all the rest of stuff. All of that
Speaker 2: is what there were gaming here. But that is not
Speaker 2: what I think happened at all. It was self inflicted
Speaker 2: with a bioweapon of the Trump shot. Michael Cunningham, who
Speaker 2: until recently served as a research fellow the Heritage Foundation,
Speaker 2: disagrees and says that China would likely would not likely
Speaker 2: use the virus as a weapon of attack since the
Speaker 2: Chinese could get harmed by it as well. But again
Speaker 2: it is I don't think that any of that pandemic
Speaker 2: stuff is real at this point in time. No one
Speaker 2: is talking about new military attack in it. But they said,
Speaker 2: once a war breaks out that involves the US and China,
Speaker 2: then all of the worst case scenarios are on the table. Yeah,
Speaker 2: these people will recklessly RUSSI ahead, just as we see
Speaker 2: them doing in Central and South America.
Speaker 4: One of the sorry interrupts. One of the funny things
Speaker 4: is that these Zionists on the right will relentlessly say
Speaker 4: that Israel has a right to that land. And then
Speaker 4: when China says, well, technically Taiwan was ours and they
Speaker 4: are still ethnically a Chinese people, so we have a
Speaker 4: right to that land, they'll say, oh no, no, no, yeah,
Speaker 4: if one of these countries has a right to one
Speaker 4: of these places, technically China has a better claim to
Speaker 4: Taiwan than Israel has to Palestine. I don't support China
Speaker 4: taking Taiwan, but it has a better claim than Israel
Speaker 4: does to Palestine. When you look at it from this angle.
Speaker 2: Well, the angle I look at it is the right
Speaker 2: of secession. I always I'm always sided with secession. If
Speaker 2: at first you don't secede, try try again. A t
Speaker 2: short of that once upon a time. But you know,
Speaker 2: I think the right of self governance is the real issue.
Speaker 2: But again, it isn't about respecting rights. It's about might
Speaker 2: makes right. That is what we see with all of
Speaker 2: these things. World war scenarios in which the US and
Speaker 2: trying to battle it out, or in which China manages
Speaker 2: to largely stay out of the war and gets to
Speaker 2: pick up the pieces and establish a new world order
Speaker 2: can't be ruled out. And of course a new world
Speaker 2: order is what the globals want, and they've always pushed
Speaker 2: to make sure that China is going to be the
Speaker 2: leader of that new world order. Well, let's move on
Speaker 2: from that to the war that's being conducted against us.
Speaker 2: In terms of ignoring the results of criminals when they
Speaker 2: are arrested, I mean, you know, this is I think
Speaker 2: one of the things that feeds into people's frustration, saying,
Speaker 2: you know, we need to just execute these people. Well,
Speaker 2: because we have a justice system so called that doesn't
Speaker 2: punish the guilty, but in many cases punishes people who've
Speaker 2: done nothing seriously wrong, if anything at all wrong. At all,
Speaker 2: the judge who freed the Charlotte killer didn't even go
Speaker 2: to law school or pass the bar. And by the way,
Speaker 2: this is kind of interesting if you look at it.
Speaker 2: This is a magistrate judge in North Carolina and they
Speaker 2: are not required by law to be licensed lawyers. They
Speaker 2: aren't elected either. The way the process works, I'll look
Speaker 2: this up. They are nominated by the county clerk of
Speaker 2: the court, who is elected, but then that person nominates people,
Speaker 2: and then they are appointed by the senior superior court
Speaker 2: judge for that district, and then they are supervised by
Speaker 2: the chief district court judge. So the bottom line, all
Speaker 2: these people are saying that this magistrate judge needs to
Speaker 2: be taken out. That doesn't get to the root of
Speaker 2: the problem. You should get rid of the clerk of
Speaker 2: the court, the senior superior court judge who appointed the person,
Speaker 2: and the person who supervised them, the chief district court judge.
Speaker 4: Removed from office, not taken out in the other sense
Speaker 4: of the words.
Speaker 2: All those people need to be taken out of the job.
Speaker 2: They all failed. This is a guy who had again
Speaker 2: long rap sheet fourteen times. He had been arrested for
Speaker 2: various things and his family members all said that he
Speaker 2: was certifiably crazy, and none of them did the job
Speaker 2: that they were supposed to do.
Speaker 5: And when you think about it, this is like a
Speaker 5: much worse scenario. If it was one elected official that
Speaker 5: got in with a bunch of Soros money, yeah, then
Speaker 5: that would be one thing. But this is one elected
Speaker 5: official that got in, probably with a lot of Soros money,
Speaker 5: and then gets to a point a horde of other minions. Yeah,
Speaker 5: this chaos to attack us continually. These people are still
Speaker 5: in getting more people in that are going to do
Speaker 5: the same.
Speaker 4: Thing exactly.
Speaker 5: The next step up. It's an order of longitude worse
Speaker 5: than these guys that get in and just release every criminal.
Speaker 5: They're getting in, guys that put in people that release
Speaker 5: every criminal.
Speaker 2: It's a yeah, it's a systemic corruption, isn't it. You're
Speaker 2: absolutely right, Lance. It would be bad enough that this
Speaker 2: person been directly elected with money from Soros, but there's
Speaker 2: a whole structure behind this, whole institutional corruption that is there,
Speaker 2: which makes it even worse. And this judge, apparently this
Speaker 2: magistrate who doesn't have a law degree and who didn't
Speaker 2: care to investigate the background of this guy before setting
Speaker 2: him free. This individual was apparently picked because of Democrat
Speaker 2: dei politics or qualification seems to be that she's a lesbian.
Speaker 4: Isn't that lovely?
Speaker 2: Yeah, so again I fire not only the magistrate, but
Speaker 2: all three of these people as well.
Speaker 5: Her real qualification is that she's willing to let murderers
Speaker 5: go free. That's what they're looking for in these criminal scumbags.
Speaker 2: That's right. I know.
Speaker 4: I read this quote the other day, but I think
Speaker 4: a Pars repeating again the one from Alexander souls Nitsen.
Speaker 4: Your punishment for having a knife when they searched you
Speaker 4: would be very different from the thiefs. For him to
Speaker 4: have a knife was mere misbehavior, tradition, he didn't know
Speaker 4: any better. But for you to have one was terrorism.
Speaker 4: That's how they view it. They look at this, they
Speaker 4: see this murderous, violent, repeat offender, criminal and just oh,
Speaker 4: he doesn't know any better. Oh no, he just did.
Speaker 2: He didn't.
Speaker 4: He wasn't raised right, He's poor, he didn't have the
Speaker 4: right advantages in life. If you are caught in the
Speaker 4: smallest process crime, they will throw the book at you.
Speaker 4: You're supposed to know better. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 4: two tier justice system. If you are.
Speaker 2: There's an article. I don't know if we'll get to
Speaker 2: it today. I'll just mention it briefly. It was from
Speaker 2: the Mesa's Institute and they were saying Trump's got a
Speaker 2: war going on his Department of Justice. This is the
Speaker 2: guy who is moving it has now become his major
Speaker 2: asset in his family. They've made major personal moves into crypto,
Speaker 2: and a part of him winning this election was embracing
Speaker 2: crypto and saying that the government had moved unjustly against
Speaker 2: Ross Olbrik Remember, and he pardoned Ross Elbrick. But now
Speaker 2: the Trump administration and this same guy, the same corrupt individual,
Speaker 2: the deputy Attorney General or whatever, who's forget what his
Speaker 2: name was, who interviewed Glaine Maxwell and then released the
Speaker 2: notes and stuff, Blanche or something like that. He's got
Speaker 2: a woman's name, but he's not a transgender. That's his
Speaker 2: last name or anyway, the same guy has continued with
Speaker 2: prosecutions that were begun under the Biden administration, and they've
Speaker 2: arrested people who were software developers creating personal custody digital
Speaker 2: wallets that were outside of their system. Todd Blanch, Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's it. I knew it was he's a blanche is
Speaker 2: doing this anyway? Uh he uh. They they're there. These
Speaker 2: guys are looking at decades in prison because they developed
Speaker 2: a piece of software. And as Mesas said, this is
Speaker 2: like locking up Afford CEO because somebody committed a crime
Speaker 2: with one of their vehicles. And uh, that's not just
Speaker 2: an is said case. There's two of these that they
Speaker 2: talk about in the Mesas things. So you've got somebody
Speaker 2: just like like what you were talking about, Travis, is like,
Speaker 2: if the government perceives what you're doing as a threat
Speaker 2: to their power that they want to exercise, they're gonna
Speaker 2: put you in jail for decades, just like they did
Speaker 2: with Ross All Break.
Speaker 4: They'll make an example out of you. Yeah, that's right
Speaker 4: way to chill it for everyone makes say if you
Speaker 4: do this, yeah, this is what happens.
Speaker 2: But if there's somebody that is certifiably insane and has
Speaker 2: been violent with people on the street, that person gets released.
Speaker 2: It's not at all. It's not at all about protecting.
Speaker 4: I mean, both those things serve their purpose. Both of
Speaker 4: those serve as a chilling effect. You know, there's these
Speaker 4: violent murders out there, so you don't want to go
Speaker 4: out it makes you want to vote for more extreme
Speaker 4: police measures. And also, you know, it's just they hate you.
Speaker 4: So if one of if this guy takes out somebody,
Speaker 4: kills somebody, sure that's another bonus for them. They despise
Speaker 4: the average American people. The people in Washington are wicked
Speaker 4: beyond our comprehension. We continually say it, but it is
Speaker 4: hard for us to imagine, you know, the level of
Speaker 4: evil that these people commit to, just because.
Speaker 2: And of course I'm protected with the army of security
Speaker 2: guards and police.
Speaker 4: Everywhere they go they have someone that is willing allegedly
Speaker 4: to lay down their life to protect them or lay yeah,
Speaker 4: and so they don't have to worry about this kind
Speaker 4: of thing. They live in these little bunkers, these walled gardens,
Speaker 4: these ivory towers, or they can look down on us
Speaker 4: and our struggles and go, oh, isn't that isn't that wonderful?
Speaker 5: And then you can talk about how the punishment for
Speaker 5: having the knife for self defense is far worse than
Speaker 5: the punishment for the criminal. It reminds me of the
Speaker 5: story we covered the other day of a person pointing
Speaker 5: out that if you look up Daniel Penny on was
Speaker 5: it ap there was one hundred stories about him, criticizing him.
Speaker 5: But yeah, days after the thing, they look up this
Speaker 5: guy still nothing, that's right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and then they were upset that the conservatives had
Speaker 2: focused on and they said, you know, we got to
Speaker 2: stop that footage from being released. We don't want people
Speaker 2: to know what's really going on. That is in the
Speaker 2: local version of what national security is about. You know,
Speaker 2: the national security state is there to protect the government.
Speaker 2: It's not there to protect the nation. It's not there
Speaker 2: to protect us. It's actually getting us involved in one
Speaker 2: conflict after the other. So last time this guy was arrested,
Speaker 2: he called nine to one one and claimed that he
Speaker 2: had been given quote a man made material unquote the
Speaker 2: controlled when he ate, what he said and where he walked.
Speaker 2: Please shupport that Brown became agitated when the officers did
Speaker 2: not believe him, leading to charges of misusing the nine
Speaker 2: to one one system. So that's it's not that this
Speaker 2: guy is absolutely bonkers. They you know, you called nine
Speaker 2: one one illegitimately.
Speaker 4: My question is he said, I mean, he's insane, so
Speaker 4: he's not logically thinking about anything, but it's controlling what
Speaker 4: you're saying doing eating thinking apparently is it making you
Speaker 4: call nine one one. How are you able to call
Speaker 4: nine one one and tell them about this if it's
Speaker 4: controlling you. But of course when you're crazy, Yeah, they're
Speaker 4: not actually processing information or thinking about anything logically.
Speaker 2: He told his family member, I think it was a
Speaker 2: brother that when he killed this young woman. He said, yeah,
Speaker 2: my hand just took over and didn't have any control
Speaker 2: over it. Again, this guy is perhaps not schizophrenic, but
Speaker 2: demonically possessed. I would say, I'm willing to believe you,
Speaker 2: and let's deal with where we are with this anyway.
Speaker 2: He had been previously arrested for assaulting his sister in
Speaker 2: charge of possession of a firearm by a fellon, but
Speaker 2: none of these things were there to put him in jail,
Speaker 2: in addition to a five year prison sentence for robbery
Speaker 2: with a dangerous weapon. Again, when you look at robbery
Speaker 2: with a dangerous weapon, that's not as serious as creating
Speaker 2: an app for a digital wallet. That's the thing that
Speaker 2: they really are concerned about. So on Monday, North Carolina
Speaker 2: Republican lawmakers issued a formal letter calling for her removal.
Speaker 2: But again, they're not talking about removing these other judges
Speaker 2: who these other individuals who nominated her, appointed her, supervised her.
Speaker 2: They're going to stay. This decision was made despite brown
Speaker 2: extensive criminal history, which included at least fourteen prior arrests
Speaker 2: for serious offenses such as possession of a firearm by
Speaker 2: a felon, robbery with a dangerous weapon, and physical assault
Speaker 2: of his sister. Despite his history a violent and unstable behavior,
Speaker 2: Magistrate Stokes released Brown without requiring bond or imposing any
Speaker 2: meaningful conditions to safeguard the public. So the controversy surrounding
Speaker 2: this judge is expected to continue a state lawmaker's way
Speaker 2: accountability measures in the wake of the killing. Then to
Speaker 2: go back and get Pulty or some of Musk's people
Speaker 2: to take some AI and go back and look at
Speaker 2: her entire career. There as a magistrate with a fine
Speaker 2: tooth comb and the people who pointed, nominated and supervised
Speaker 2: her as well. Well, we're going to take a quick break,
Speaker 2: but before we do, you want to take a look.
Speaker 4: At some of the Yes, we've got b. L. Houghten,
Speaker 4: who is Anastasia J. Casey, stereous author behind the shooting
Speaker 4: of Charlie cook book, sparking intrigue. The book appeared on
Speaker 4: Amazon nine to nine, one day prior to the shooting.
Speaker 4: I've seen people say that I've seen screenshots of it,
Speaker 4: but the link is dead. You cannot look at it.
Speaker 4: And with the ability, as far as I'm aware, to
Speaker 4: edit the HTML on basically any web page and make
Speaker 4: it say just about anything you want on your end
Speaker 4: and take a screenshot of it, I am always wary
Speaker 4: of these things unless you can confirm it for yourself.
Speaker 4: I don't trust screenshots. There's an entire industry that's built
Speaker 4: around generating clickbait, and they're not above, you know, faking
Speaker 4: this kind of thing. They're not above putting up some
Speaker 4: AI book on Amazon or having placeholders there that they
Speaker 4: can quickly edit and swap for different things, and then
Speaker 4: editing the HTML to make it look different. Again, it's possible.
Speaker 4: Anything is possible. These people are evil, and there's again
Speaker 4: I don't blame anyone for not believing, you know, the
Speaker 4: official story.
Speaker 2: We're going to get in some of the questions and
Speaker 2: conspiracy ideas later on in the programs.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's just I'm always wary of this kind of thing. There.
Speaker 4: As I said, there's an entire industry that's built around
Speaker 4: sensationalism and getting clicks, and these kinds of headlines always
Speaker 4: generate clicks, and always question the source of where this
Speaker 4: is coming from, Bill Houghten, how could you know it
Speaker 4: was going to happen for it took place on Utah
Speaker 4: Valley University if it is real, if it did actually
Speaker 4: appear beforehand, and then you know that is questionable. But
Speaker 4: I saw the cover of the book. It looks like
Speaker 4: it was AI generated and as far as you know,
Speaker 4: it looks like it's AI. So it looks like someone
Speaker 4: very quickly through this together to generate outrage and clicks
Speaker 4: on articles for the you know, gossip mill that has
Speaker 4: grown up over the years online.
Speaker 5: I have the thing that.
Speaker 8: He had here.
Speaker 5: This is the article that he like.
Speaker 4: Okay, yeah, what's the website that's on Times Now World? Interesting? Yeah, again,
Speaker 4: that's I've never heard of before. Yeah, I would just again,
Speaker 4: it's possible. But again, I believe you can basically edit
Speaker 4: the HTML of any webpage on your end to have
Speaker 4: it display just about anything you want. And since I've
Speaker 4: only seen screenshots and I'm not able to confirm that
Speaker 4: it was posted with my own eyes, I don't want
Speaker 4: to make any claims on it.
Speaker 5: Well, I don't know if it's true or not. The
Speaker 5: author of this article says it was put up and
Speaker 5: then removed from Amazon, but screenshots when it was still
Speaker 5: up are still there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, which I guess part of the question would be,
Speaker 2: what would the motivation be to do that? Yeah, you know,
Speaker 2: if somebody was involved, if there was a conspiracy and
Speaker 2: there was something like that, what would be the motivation
Speaker 2: for them to tip their hand and say, yes.
Speaker 4: The people involved with this are all already mega rich
Speaker 4: as a general rule, they're not going to need the
Speaker 4: money they make off an Amazon book. That there could
Speaker 4: be again more of just the haha, rubbing your face
Speaker 4: in it. But I tend to believe personally this is
Speaker 4: more rumor mill nonsense to generate clicks for websites so
Speaker 4: that they can speculate wildly and say, look, we found this.
Speaker 5: I'm not saying that it's true or anything. I don't know.
Speaker 5: As you said, screenshots are easily adopted. But if this
Speaker 5: was a legitimate thing, it could be a matter of
Speaker 5: someone putting up their manifesto preemptively.
Speaker 4: That is true. Potentially the Lee manifesto from the shooter
Speaker 4: scheduled to go out at a certain time that then
Speaker 4: got removed. Who knows, Wally Walrus? Are we at war
Speaker 4: with Venezuela? Not officially, not officially.
Speaker 2: And Trump's mind, we are, and he's already laid out
Speaker 2: the plans and that's been leaked. That's out there. Possum again,
Speaker 2: it's the oil.
Speaker 4: I think we do love ourselves some oil possom king.
Speaker 4: They are the law, they are the Lawsonovante seventeen seventy six.
Speaker 4: Vance is a Peter Teele created political puppet. Yes, I
Speaker 4: would have gone for a less creepy puppet. Solo Cat
Speaker 4: nineteen eighty Trump petrend pretends to care about the assassination
Speaker 4: of Charlie Kirk while he assassinates people elsewhere. Yeah, Biel Hoten,
Speaker 4: Oh they got him now. Third one who had time
Speaker 4: to jump off the roof with no weapon, but found
Speaker 4: the rifle nearby woods in a box wrapped in a towel.
Speaker 4: I saw the video of the guy jumping off the roof.
Speaker 2: It's how'd the rifle get to that area if he
Speaker 2: wasn't carrying it when he jumped off.
Speaker 4: From Yeah, i'd be I want to know exactly. I
Speaker 4: want to see a diagram of where everything was found
Speaker 4: and ever how it was all laid out. I want
Speaker 4: to see it. Somebody put that together.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I thought about that as well. We don't have
Speaker 2: the video here, but they just released last night the video.
Speaker 2: They'd released some stills of the guy. Now they've released
Speaker 2: some videos, and one of those was him running across
Speaker 2: the roof not carrying anything and then and that's very
Speaker 2: easy to see because when he gets to the corner
Speaker 2: you can see it. He's hanging there by his hands,
Speaker 2: so he's choosing both hands to hang before he drops
Speaker 2: to the ground, and did not injure himself. Like what was.
Speaker 3: Booth?
Speaker 2: Oh I'm looking at that, John. Yeah, Now he had
Speaker 2: Converse snickers, which Booth did.
Speaker 5: Not have, so compoof to this guy, that's pretty rude.
Speaker 2: John wolkspoof. Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 4: I need to scroll that up a little bit. Lance,
Speaker 4: But we've got con Think, Thank you very much. Con Think,
Speaker 4: he says, Charlie Kirk was moderate. Yeah he was. He
Speaker 4: was very very center line Republican things that would have
Speaker 4: been just standard common sense about ten to fifteen years ago.
Speaker 2: That's the thing that surprised me when I looked at
Speaker 2: this British article saying the five controversial areas. Five controversial
Speaker 2: areas comments that Charlie Kirk made. I look, I thought
Speaker 2: that's pretty milpe those stuff.
Speaker 4: Actually just I've never heard Charlie Kirk say anything that
Speaker 4: would be controversial to a standard line of thinking again
Speaker 4: ten to fifteen years ago. I don't agree with the
Speaker 4: stance on Zionism. I think that should be controversial. I
Speaker 4: think that should be seen as something that we should
Speaker 4: debate and have arguments about. But that's it. Everything else
Speaker 4: is just Yeah, I kind of agree with that. Yeah, sure, I.
Speaker 5: Mean across the board, it was pretty much the position
Speaker 5: of the Republican Party, mainline Republicanism.
Speaker 2: Especially under Trump. Yeah, he was a big part of
Speaker 2: the Trump organization. And I think a big part of
Speaker 2: why Trump won because Trump did very well with age
Speaker 2: demographic and I think it's largely due to Charlie Kirk
Speaker 2: and his organization as well. Yeah. B. L.
Speaker 4: Houghton got him a new Richard Jewel be My Valentine
Speaker 4: says his speech was AI who they referring to.
Speaker 5: I've seen people talking about this. Trump put up a
Speaker 5: video and in the video there's one spot where it's
Speaker 5: two different cuts and they do what's known as a
Speaker 5: morph cut where they have a quick crossfade between the
Speaker 5: two cuts, and because you're not going to be in
Speaker 5: the exact same position, Yeah, it creates a sort of
Speaker 5: warping effect. If you look at the rest of the video,
Speaker 5: it looks good. There was just one morph cut, and
Speaker 5: that can look like an AI artifact. There are AI
Speaker 5: artifacts that sometimes look like that. But I highly tout
Speaker 5: Trump would have put out an AI video talking about
Speaker 5: the Charlie Kirk shooting after it happens. There's absolutely no
Speaker 5: reason anyone would do that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly why when he do that? That doesn't make sense.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's a lot of these people. While I think
Speaker 4: Trump is kind of a fool, a lot of the
Speaker 4: people surrounding him are, while wicked, incredibly intelligent and very
Speaker 4: very good at cloaking their hand and their motives. They
Speaker 4: tend not to take risks unless they need to. Yona
Speaker 4: Andy Wodie. At least that's my opinion. I don't fault
Speaker 4: anyone for disagreeing on anything, Yanna any Wody good to
Speaker 4: see Yona Satan Yaho pronounced him dead fourteen minutes after
Speaker 4: he was shot in ten minutes before the hospital did
Speaker 4: amazing Jesse Lee Peter's amazing timed non tides forcing masks
Speaker 4: on Americans broke the social contract. My neighbors. Voting to
Speaker 4: do that to my family is unacceptable. They are Yes,
Speaker 4: they are violating the NAP. They are using violence.
Speaker 2: Well, social contract is a bill of rights in my opinion,
Speaker 2: I don't know people since, as one person said, I
Speaker 2: think it was I think it was Lysander Spooner who
Speaker 2: said the Constitution's a document. I can't find my signature
Speaker 2: and so I'm not beholden to it. But you know,
Speaker 2: these people who are in political office take an oath
Speaker 2: to it as a condition of their office, and so
Speaker 2: it is their signature is on that, and that's what
Speaker 2: they have broken.
Speaker 4: So yeah, Yona Annie Wodi. Presidents are just salesmen for
Speaker 4: Pentagon wars of bullets and time bombs. Trump is a
Speaker 4: pretty good salesman for that sort of thing. I'm not buying,
Speaker 4: but a lot of people are. Don't frag me. Bro
Speaker 4: Israel cannot do what it does about the support of
Speaker 4: the US, UK, EU and DHARPA tech. That's why they
Speaker 4: need people like Jeffrey Epstein getting blackmail on people so
Speaker 4: they can make sure that someone doesn't grow a spine
Speaker 4: and go, hey, wait a minute, what's the deal with
Speaker 4: apec Phonsie Bear morning? The New York Times in LA
Speaker 4: Times reported Kirk being shot the day before. On the ninth,
Speaker 4: Amazon Books released online the shooting of Charlie Kirk one
Speaker 4: day before complete style. Again, I've seen people talking about
Speaker 4: The New York Times and LA Times reporting on it.
Speaker 4: I cannot find a real source of it. I can't
Speaker 4: find pictures of an article. I can't find it. I've
Speaker 4: seen clips from Alex to Alex Jones talking about it,
Speaker 4: but I haven't been able to verify it for myself.
Speaker 2: That makes it sus right there.
Speaker 4: Again. Like I said, will throw.
Speaker 2: Everything against the wall if it's sensational. He does not
Speaker 2: care folks about whether it's true or not. This is
Speaker 2: the thing. Look, I'm not interested in criticizing my criticizing
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk over disagreements that I have with him over
Speaker 2: policies or personnel like Trump. He's not a danger to
Speaker 2: anybody now and there's no point in doing it. But
Speaker 2: it is dangerous if people pay attention to these influencers
Speaker 2: like Alex Jones. He is still a clear and present
Speaker 2: danger to people. If you believe him if you trust
Speaker 2: what he has to say. And so I don't like
Speaker 2: calling people out by name, but that is the reality
Speaker 2: if you've got somebody out there. These people see themselves
Speaker 2: as influencers, and it is an influencer war, that's what
Speaker 2: it really is, not information war. And so these people
Speaker 2: are there to nudge you. And that's why the government
Speaker 2: protects them, does not charge them with the crime. The
Speaker 2: government's charging everybody with crimes. It's just look at Januine
Speaker 2: the did he get charge of anything? No, not at all.
Speaker 2: That should be very suspicious. Talk about that instead of
Speaker 2: his conspiracies about the New York Times and the LA Times.
Speaker 2: It's the fact that he didn't get indicted. Is the
Speaker 2: dog that did not bark? That's the reality of all
Speaker 2: this stuff.
Speaker 4: Also, think it's.
Speaker 5: Interesting to me, you know, there's quite a lot of
Speaker 5: confusion and fog of war surrounding all this stuff, which
Speaker 5: in my mind actually lends some credibility to this not
Speaker 5: being a inside job set up thing, because typically when
Speaker 5: that happens, they have everything about the person, their entire
Speaker 5: life's history, from what they had for breakfast that morning
Speaker 5: on the manifesto. Yeah, and a clear thing of this
Speaker 5: is what we need to do about it. Here's the solution.
Speaker 5: They don't, you know, arrest and let go three people.
Speaker 3: So I'm not.
Speaker 2: They're kind of panicking at this point. Now, that's one
Speaker 2: of the after effects of this is that these politicians
Speaker 2: are like, oh, we need more security, and we got
Speaker 2: chains of security measures.
Speaker 4: And I also understand why people would be so prone
Speaker 4: to not trusting anything that comes up. The government lies continually,
Speaker 4: and the fact that this is an assassination makes it
Speaker 4: suspect in general because in the past so many of
Speaker 4: them have been tied directly into the government. So I
Speaker 4: completely understand why everyone is looking around and finding different
Speaker 4: weird things.
Speaker 5: Yeah, that's what I was about to say. I'm not
Speaker 5: saying that I know that it is an organic, actual
Speaker 5: event that wasn't put up by one of these intelligence organizations.
Speaker 5: But we just need to look at all the evidence
Speaker 5: carefully right now, because right now it's all very confusing
Speaker 5: and changing as more information comes out.
Speaker 4: Yes, Pezzoonovante seventeen seventy six death toll in Israeli air
Speaker 4: strikes on Yemen rises to forty six, including eleven women
Speaker 4: and five children. It's important, yeah, to continue to pray
Speaker 4: for those people.
Speaker 2: That's a key thing, the fact that they are not
Speaker 2: concerned at all with the starvation of children with a
Speaker 2: direct attacks targeted, sustained now for years against a civilian population.
Speaker 2: There's no justification for that. Nothing justifies that. Your understanding
Speaker 2: of eschatology and end times could never justify that. And
Speaker 2: I say to you that if you think that it does,
Speaker 2: you have missed the entire message of Christ, and you
Speaker 2: are twisting this eschatology to justify what He is adamantly against.
Speaker 2: We'll take a quick break and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Making sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 9: Whether you're feeling like the booze where or bluegrass? APS
Speaker 9: Radio has you covered. Check out a wide variety of
Speaker 9: channels on our app at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 6: Wait a minute, where am I sorry, Jefferson. The scoundrels
Speaker 6: who put America on Central Bank Fiat currency used our
Speaker 6: heads on their coins as some sort of trophy. Despicable.
Speaker 10: This is outrageous, Washington. I spent my life fighting centralized power.
Speaker 10: Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their
Speaker 10: monopoly money. Tell me there's some good news to all this.
Speaker 6: Well, there is a coin they can't control, one that
Speaker 6: isn't backed by the FED, but backed by the FED
Speaker 6: up the All New David Knight Show Commemorative coin. But
Speaker 6: now patriots can support a show that won't sell out
Speaker 6: with a limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.
Speaker 10: They say, money talks, and this coin has something worth
Speaker 10: listening to. The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
Speaker 2: And I do want to thank those of you who
Speaker 2: have supported us. I've got names here people who have
Speaker 2: supported us on zal Your bank may support that. You
Speaker 2: can also get the app, by the way, but Mitchell M,
Speaker 2: john S, Susan L. Lyndon, H. Kenneth C, Mary Ellen
Speaker 2: m Mary Ellen Moore. Everybody knows Mariyonlanmore. Don't need to
Speaker 2: keep her anonymous. ROSEG. Michael P, Sean S. Julie W.
Speaker 2: And David R. Thank you all of you for your support.
Speaker 2: That's on zell and real quickly on cash app, which
Speaker 2: you can find links to these on Davidknight dot news.
Speaker 2: We have Jonathan L. Richard A. Patrick V. Christopher Michael B.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much all of you for the support.
Speaker 2: And we're going to go to September eleventh, now before
Speaker 2: we get to Charlie Kirk, because I want to talk
Speaker 2: a little bit about that and people's reactions and comments
Speaker 2: on it at this point in time. Why nine to
Speaker 2: eleven Truth still matters a quarter of a century on.
Speaker 2: This is from the Free Thought Project. They said, the
Speaker 2: nine to eleven Truth movement still pushes on confronting the
Speaker 2: lies of the official narrative, despite waning public interest, and
Speaker 2: it's just as important today as it was twenty four
Speaker 2: years go. It is seminal. I mean, you talk about
Speaker 2: crossing the rubicon. So much stuff changed in reaction to
Speaker 2: nine to eleven. Even if the story had been true,
Speaker 2: you could not justify the types of things that they
Speaker 2: have done in America because they're unconstitutional. All I know
Speaker 2: about all this stuff is that the official story could
Speaker 2: not be true any more than the story about the
Speaker 2: magic bullet and the jfk assassination could be true. So
Speaker 2: it is based on absurdity, and that is the reality,
Speaker 2: you know, when we go back and look at as
Speaker 2: amazing as I said yesterday, Tucker Carlson is going to
Speaker 2: do a documentary about nine to eleven, the guy who
Speaker 2: was part of the cover up. As far as I'm concerned.
Speaker 2: This is a Building seven, which he said he couldn't
Speaker 2: talk about or he'd get fired twenty years ago, But
Speaker 2: now he's going to do a documentary on it. We'll
Speaker 2: start with this.
Speaker 11: Tight cent to seven, just before it collapsed on September.
Speaker 2: The eleventh, one minor fire hit.
Speaker 11: By an aircraft. It had been damaged by falling debris
Speaker 11: and fire, but by five twenty pm most of the
Speaker 11: fires had been extinguished. Although the building was forty seven
Speaker 11: stories high, it doesn't fall sideways nor collapse unevenly. For
Speaker 11: this to have happened, all of the building's vertical supports
Speaker 11: must have given way at almost exactly the same time. Yet,
Speaker 11: the Federal Emergency Management Agency reported that the collapse was
Speaker 11: due primarily to fire. But what does it look like
Speaker 11: to you?
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, since then, we have seen buildings,
Speaker 2: skyscrapers that were on fire for several days, never collapsing
Speaker 2: like that, even when there's nothing.
Speaker 11: Left standards and technology.
Speaker 4: You only need rule to see this collapse in a
Speaker 4: controlled demolition, especially in a building that was They never
Speaker 4: claimed anything struck Building seven. There's no footage of it.
Speaker 4: They entirely claim it caught on fire from some debris
Speaker 4: where that question is somewhere.
Speaker 11: Do you believe what you can see with your own
Speaker 11: eyes or do you believe what you had told?
Speaker 4: Because these buildings were built to the standard code in
Speaker 4: New York City, and if a small fire is enough
Speaker 4: to take down Building seven, that means New York should
Speaker 4: be just about collapsing continually daily. This would be a
Speaker 4: continual event that you would be seeing. You'd be seeing
Speaker 4: skyscraper after skyscraper.
Speaker 2: That's the bottom line is because do you believe what
Speaker 2: you see with your own eyes or do you believe
Speaker 2: their official story? And that is exactly the parallel that
Speaker 2: we wound up having with the so called pandemic, which
Speaker 2: I've always said is the other shoe to drop. The
Speaker 2: two of those things are inextricably tied together from the beginning.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, the Dark Winter simulation, which
Speaker 2: was what they executed, practiced for twenty years and executed
Speaker 2: on US twenty twenty, that was done. The first one
Speaker 2: of those was done two months before nine eleven. Then
Speaker 2: you had the false flag anthrax attack. Then two months
Speaker 2: later they put out the model legislation to get around
Speaker 2: the tenth Amendment, and all that was required was for
Speaker 2: a president to release the money and the incentives to
Speaker 2: get people to do it at the state level. And
Speaker 2: that's what MAGA refused to understand about Trump. In two
Speaker 2: thousand and one, you were a trader and a terrorist
Speaker 2: sympathizer for daring to question the official orthodoxy of nine
Speaker 2: to one one. In twenty ten, you were a wing
Speaker 2: nut conspiracy theorist. In twenty twenty five, the Overton window
Speaker 2: has moved, and while questioning the official story of nine
Speaker 2: to eleven can still get you some strange looks in
Speaker 2: some circles, only the most naive sufferers of statist Stockholm
Speaker 2: syndrome still by the entirety of the official story. Three
Speaker 2: years ago, the Free Thought Project published a crash course
Speaker 2: in nine eleven Truth seven documentaries you need to see
Speaker 2: to serve as a comprehensive introduction or refresher course for
Speaker 2: readers to become familiar. See. That's the other thing too.
Speaker 2: It's important to see that. And as he pointed out,
Speaker 2: it didn't fall to the side or anything like that.
Speaker 2: That's why when I've told the story, we didn't have television,
Speaker 2: and we didn't have internet that was strong enough that
Speaker 2: we could watch videos in two thousand and one, so
Speaker 2: I'm getting phone reports from relatives.
Speaker 4: I didn't even learn about it until the next day.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and I didn't see for a very long time,
Speaker 2: ever see a video of it. I would say it
Speaker 2: was probably years. I was focused on the text side
Speaker 2: of things very rarely. We didn't have television any of
Speaker 2: this stuff, and so I didn't see that. When I
Speaker 2: was told that it fell down, I couldn't imagine that
Speaker 2: just fell in its footprint. I'm thinking, Okay, how much
Speaker 2: of Manhattan did that take out? Because I figured it
Speaker 2: had gone off and falling down across the way.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Even as a kid, I was only about nine
Speaker 4: years old at the time, I remember being told, you
Speaker 4: know these buildings. I didn't know what the World Trade Centers were.
Speaker 4: I never see a picture of them. But when you're
Speaker 4: told a building has fallen over, and you're told, oh,
Speaker 4: it got hit by a plane, you think, oh, part
Speaker 4: of it went yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And if you go back and you look at
Speaker 2: demolitions of buildings on YouTube, which I suggest you do,
Speaker 2: you'll see that occasionally somebody's taking out a silo or
Speaker 2: something and it will go wrong. Instead of collapsing vertically down,
Speaker 2: it will fall over and wipe out a lot of
Speaker 2: things in its footprint. But of course that did not
Speaker 2: happen here, so they said yes. As yet, as decades
Speaker 2: tick on and the goalposts move, as the public has
Speaker 2: bombarded with a day loser propaganda, social engineering, and manufactured outrage,
Speaker 2: all types of fifth generational warfare, it seems as though
Speaker 2: this ever so pivot whole point in world history has
Speaker 2: somewhat fallen to the wayside. And I've done several interviews
Speaker 2: with architects and engineers both on nine to eleven as
Speaker 2: well as on the anthrax attack, and they have continued
Speaker 2: to follow up on that as well. For once nine
Speaker 2: eleven truth was to be all and end all of
Speaker 2: truth liberty movement, drawing thousands to attend truth rallies in
Speaker 2: New York City and Washington, led by the families of
Speaker 2: the victims. Often most of the public has since tuned
Speaker 2: it out. They recycled it for another tragedy of the moment,
Speaker 2: And of course yesterday it was Charlie Kirk that dominated
Speaker 2: the headlines and instead of the as they point out,
Speaker 2: the state sponsored murder of thousands twenty years ago. To
Speaker 2: achieve their objectives, and that is to completely do an
Speaker 2: in run around the Constitution so they could have endless
Speaker 2: wars and the justification to establish the foundations of the
Speaker 2: police surveillance state. That all was the outcome of that.
Speaker 2: And of course the other shoe to drop was a
Speaker 2: pandemic twenty years later.
Speaker 4: Sorry to interruptural fast, but it does look like they
Speaker 4: have who believe the shooter is in custody. It seems
Speaker 4: like he was turned in by a family member, if
Speaker 4: you know, this is the official story so far, a
Speaker 4: guy named Tyler Robinson. Apparently he told his dad and
Speaker 4: his family or father turned him in for the shooting.
Speaker 2: They told him they did it.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's what is being reported right now as of
Speaker 4: thirty minutes ago.
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, nobody gets away with any of these things.
Speaker 2: Of course, we never know if that's for real or not,
Speaker 2: but we'll see, we'll follow that. This year's anniversary nine
Speaker 2: to eleven was commemorated a number of individuals in Washington,
Speaker 2: d C. And they said that over the course of
Speaker 2: three days, turning the tide nine one one justice in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty four and they've got a promotional thing. Therefore,
Speaker 2: it goes through Today is a last day. Began on
Speaker 2: September tenth, and today is a last day. And if
Speaker 2: you look at the people who are speaking there, I
Speaker 2: have some issues with some of the people there. Now.
Speaker 2: I've interviewed John Kyriaku and Richard Gage, and I think
Speaker 2: for the most part, I would go along with what
Speaker 2: they have to say. Dennis Cascinich and a lot of
Speaker 2: people are going to be concerned with how this was used,
Speaker 2: regardless of how it was, who did it, and how
Speaker 2: they executed this. But you've also got people like Tucker
Speaker 2: Carlson going to be speaking there, and it's like, I'm sorry,
Speaker 2: but you know, as I played yesterday, I'll play it
Speaker 2: again here. That's Tucker when you're young.
Speaker 3: Do you have any in the building?
Speaker 1: Sure?
Speaker 12: Sure, Let's start with a collapse of building seven. Can
Speaker 12: you roll the video clip that I sent to you?
Speaker 1: Okay, I'm not sure, but specified.
Speaker 12: Maybe there's some kind of code you just don't show
Speaker 12: the collapse of building seven.
Speaker 2: I don't know what it is.
Speaker 3: They don't care if you think the earth is flat,
Speaker 3: but it's not a threat to anyone.
Speaker 9: But if you say, like what actually happened with Building seven,
Speaker 9: like that is weird?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: It doesn't right? If you were to say.
Speaker 9: Something like that on television's slip Out.
Speaker 2: Yeah, now Tucker Carlson is going to take over the
Speaker 2: truth movement. That's the guy that they have set up
Speaker 2: to take over the truth movement. And then I see
Speaker 2: Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Schaeffer, and I'll just say this, it
Speaker 2: was Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Schaeffer who jumped in with the
Speaker 2: Steve Pachinnick narrative about the Sting that lost all credibility
Speaker 2: in my opinion for that man. And so when you
Speaker 2: got people like that speaking, I just have to shake
Speaker 2: my head and say, this is what has happened. They
Speaker 2: always co opt these movements with their own people in
Speaker 2: later years. It was exact blueprint that paved the way
Speaker 2: for the draconian abuses of the COVID nineteen eighty four regime.
Speaker 2: So it's free thought project. Well, no, they were always
Speaker 2: tied together from the very beginning with Dark Winter and
Speaker 2: Anthrax attack and that type of thing. Nine loven. Truth
Speaker 2: isn't just about seeking justice for victims and families that
Speaker 2: were who lost members. It's about seeking to dismantle the
Speaker 2: system that profits from these wars of expansion. Domestic institutions
Speaker 2: of exploitation and oppression. It's about reclaiming one's personal liberty
Speaker 2: from the clutches of the state and fighting for a
Speaker 2: better future for all of us. So in light of that,
Speaker 2: I got to say, be careful of these nudge news influencers.
Speaker 2: It really concerns me that Tucker Caralson is going to
Speaker 2: now take over the nine to eleven movement, and anything
Speaker 2: this guy does, everybody flocks to him and it becomes
Speaker 2: the new baseline of people's understanding. So he's going to
Speaker 2: completely rewrite all these investigations that have been done for
Speaker 2: the longest amount of time. That's what's going to be
Speaker 2: happening in the future with nine to eleven. And I thought,
Speaker 2: this is from Wall Street Journal and it is not
Speaker 2: about nine to eleven at all, But the headline was
Speaker 2: the rise of conspiracy physics, and it made me think
Speaker 2: of Building seven and the fact that Tucker Caralson never
Speaker 2: wanted to talk about it, and he wouldn't just say
Speaker 2: I'd get fired if I did something like that. He
Speaker 2: would actually oppose these people, and he'd say, all they
Speaker 2: want to do is talk to me about you know,
Speaker 2: what is the melting point of steel and what is
Speaker 2: the temperature of burning airplane fuel and things like that.
Speaker 2: He didn't want to look at that. He didn't want
Speaker 2: to look at the physics of a building that falls
Speaker 2: into its own footprints.
Speaker 4: Isn't that weird?
Speaker 2: Yeah, isn't that weird? And of course there's also the
Speaker 2: disappearing plane at the Pentagon that was there. The nine
Speaker 2: to eleven attacks exposed major government failure, but Americans learned
Speaker 2: the wrong lessons. And this is kind of this is
Speaker 2: from themeses dot org. And I was disappointed in this article.
Speaker 2: I got to say it was a tremendous success. It
Speaker 2: was not a failure, just like our schools are a
Speaker 2: tremendous success, not a failure. They are opposed to anything
Speaker 2: that we would ever want to have, but that it's
Speaker 2: exactly they're doing exactly what they were designed to do.
Speaker 2: And I got to say that. You know, their position is,
Speaker 2: of course that the official story is true, but the
Speaker 2: government reaction is wrong. And that's where I was until
Speaker 2: I saw the pictures of what happened there. It's like, no, no, no,
Speaker 2: we don't want to have the Patriot Act. That is
Speaker 2: a horrible response. Even if every word that they said
Speaker 2: were true, that was the wrong response. But that's it
Speaker 2: was not a failure. It was a failure to understand
Speaker 2: and still is a failure to understand on a part
Speaker 2: of many. Instead, while the Bush administration claimed the attacks
Speaker 2: occurred because of structural problems with the government's intelligent apparatus,
Speaker 2: FBI agents were warned about the suspicious activity by flight
Speaker 2: students who were among the nine to eleven hijackers. Again,
Speaker 2: this is a part of the mythology but also part
Speaker 2: of the preparation as well, And they should have been
Speaker 2: concerned when somebody developed indestructible identification.
Speaker 4: Cards exactly what kind of paper is that?
Speaker 2: And of course, but they focus on the response that
Speaker 2: would have been wrong. Again, whoever wrote this article that
Speaker 2: meanses takes the government story at face value and believes it.
Speaker 2: And even if you did that, the global war on
Speaker 2: terror is the wrong response, just like when we look
Speaker 2: at if the pandemic were real, Trump's response was exactly
Speaker 2: the wrong response. And so again it is always even
Speaker 2: if even if their lives were true, what they decided
Speaker 2: to do was the wrong thing. That feeling that we
Speaker 2: were really all one people, And I got to say
Speaker 2: that this is from the epic times, remembering nine to eleven.
Speaker 2: You know, when we were all on the same page
Speaker 2: and we were all pulling together. That is why they
Speaker 2: take us to war, because when you have war, it
Speaker 2: unites the people behind the government against the outside nebulous enemy,
Speaker 2: when in reality, in most cases, it is the government
Speaker 2: that is causing the war, the government that is taking
Speaker 2: you to war simply because, as Jerald Celenti has said
Speaker 2: so many times times, when all else fails and you're
Speaker 2: about to come after the government, they take you to
Speaker 2: war so that you're rally behind them. This is what
Speaker 2: we're seeing in Yahoo doing. It's a big part of
Speaker 2: what he did in Israel. Scientists sound the alarm and
Speaker 2: exposed the deadly COVID vaccine side effects that have been
Speaker 2: scrubbed from federal data. And again, is this another government
Speaker 2: mistake or is this a deliberate conspiracy. I am not
Speaker 2: a coincidence theorist. I don't believe these things are coincidences.
Speaker 2: A world renowned scientist has just mown the lid off
Speaker 2: a safe and effective narrative for the COVID vaccines the
Speaker 2: Trump Shots. After uncovering shocking data scrubbed from the federal
Speaker 2: government safety database. They hid thousands of safety signals from
Speaker 2: the public. But I got to say, how did we know?
Speaker 2: We knew at this time because we knew that this
Speaker 2: stuff A had not been tested. They bragged about the
Speaker 2: fact they're going to rush it to market. We knew
Speaker 2: that it was a genetic code injection that had never
Speaker 2: been tested. And then we saw very early on. I
Speaker 2: remember when it's like, look at this, We've got enough
Speaker 2: reports in the Various database. It's the same as they
Speaker 2: would get for an entire year, and it's only been
Speaker 2: a couple of days or weeks or something like that.
Speaker 2: And then before you know it, it kept escalating, and
Speaker 2: then it was equivalent to several years of the database.
Speaker 2: And then it was more than all of the adverse
Speaker 2: effects have been recorded in the Various database since they
Speaker 2: had begun it. How could you not know that this
Speaker 2: was harmful? So yes, at the same time, they were
Speaker 2: hiding these safety signals and instead of more deserving the
Speaker 2: FDA system missed an estimated ninety six percent of pfizers
Speaker 2: and ninety one percent of moderna's safety signals. That amounts
Speaker 2: to as many as six thousand, seven hundred and sixty
Speaker 2: five safety signals effectively lost so why is it still there?
Speaker 2: Why is it that the Trump administration that RFK Junior
Speaker 2: and all these MAGA Maha health officials have not shut
Speaker 2: this thing down. As we said before, if you have
Speaker 2: a baby's crib that causes a couple of injuries or death,
Speaker 2: they shut that thing down. Sixty seven one hundred safety
Speaker 2: signals and that's still out there. Wisman argues, this wasn't
Speaker 2: a minor oversight.
Speaker 4: Whoops.
Speaker 2: That is the biggest understatement I've ever seen. He said,
Speaker 2: regulators used high thresholds that filtered out early alerts and
Speaker 2: ignored the masking effects where signals from one vaccine can
Speaker 2: hide signals from another. Look, they've been doing this with autism,
Speaker 2: they do it with everything, and it is a deliberate program,
Speaker 2: and we need to understand that or will never make
Speaker 2: any sense of what the government is doing. So again,
Speaker 2: it was not don't allow them to say that it
Speaker 2: was a good faith effort. It was never a good
Speaker 2: faith effort, and it was not. They didn't do their
Speaker 2: best to save us from a lab leak, deadly virus.
Speaker 2: Don't buy into that. These are these same influencers who
Speaker 2: are trying to tell you that the that the pandemic
Speaker 2: was real, that it was dangerous, that the PCR procedures
Speaker 2: were real, and all the rest of this stuff, everything
Speaker 2: about it was fake, phony and these new narratives that
Speaker 2: they're pushing so hard, and I say new there were
Speaker 2: some people pushing that from the very beginning, interestingly, but
Speaker 2: they has now become the establishment push that. Yeah, you know,
Speaker 2: Fauci rigged this stuff, and he was the one who
Speaker 2: was responsible. He in the Chinese and so this is
Speaker 2: about projecting this onto them so that you don't come
Speaker 2: after the real criminals. Comments.
Speaker 4: Yes, radust Bro, thank you very much for that, radus Bro,
Speaker 4: thank you. Soy's willing to bet it's an angry leftist
Speaker 4: kid who hates his parents and the FBI is just
Speaker 4: being distracted while the real killer will never be found.
Speaker 4: What the reporting is that the father saw the pictures
Speaker 4: that were released of the suspect, confronted the son, and
Speaker 4: the son admitted it to him. That's what's being reported
Speaker 4: so far. But again with everything the way it is,
Speaker 4: who knows the official story is? Who knows?
Speaker 2: Well? First of all, you know, they're going to find
Speaker 2: the guy. They always find the guy. Whether they find
Speaker 2: the guy or not. That was one of the things.
Speaker 2: Errol Morris's first documentaries was The Thin Blue Line, and
Speaker 2: it was about a guy who was on death row.
Speaker 2: And he started out to do a documentary just on
Speaker 2: people who are on death row. And as he started
Speaker 2: interviewing this particular guy, he got interested in this case
Speaker 2: the guy. Of course, everybody insists that they are innocent,
Speaker 2: but this guy he found to be very convincing and
Speaker 2: he started interviewing people, and Errol Morris when he would
Speaker 2: interview people the documentary, he used to be an investigator
Speaker 2: to detect to himself, and he had something he called
Speaker 2: an terotron, which was an interesting technique. What he would do.
Speaker 2: Instead of talking to people face to face, he would
Speaker 2: separate himself from them a little bit by using a
Speaker 2: teleprompter and so the people would be looking at him
Speaker 2: and talking to him in the teleprompter and by having
Speaker 2: that distance that was there. Of course, he was also
Speaker 2: a very good interrogator as well, but he believed that
Speaker 2: that helped to get them to open up and to
Speaker 2: disarm them, because it was almost like they were talking
Speaker 2: to something that wasn't there, wasn't real. I guess maybe
Speaker 2: there was an aspect of that it's involved in the
Speaker 2: AI psychosis stuff that's out there, but it kind of
Speaker 2: got proven when he interviewed Robert McNamara for his film
Speaker 2: The Fog of War, and over a couple of days,
Speaker 2: basically McNamara admitted it was Vietnam's started over a false flag,
Speaker 2: and that he was a war criminal and many other things.
Speaker 2: That was truly amazing what he got him to admit to.
Speaker 2: And so as part of this, Errol Morris got the
Speaker 2: real killer to admit that he had done it. And
Speaker 2: the reason I say they will always find the man
Speaker 2: is because it involved a police officer who was shot
Speaker 2: and killed. They do not want you to see that
Speaker 2: the killer of a police officer goes free and isn't caught.
Speaker 2: So they're going to catch somebody, whether it's the right
Speaker 2: person or not. And that is clear the case with
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk. They will catch somebody, whether it's the right
Speaker 2: person or not.
Speaker 4: You're going to make sure somebody pays for the crime.
Speaker 5: Yeah, you look at what happened with that old guy.
Speaker 5: When I first saw that, I thought it was just
Speaker 5: a matter of you know, them grabbing some random person.
Speaker 5: But I later heard that this guy was as soon
Speaker 5: as the shooting happens, He's yelling out like I have
Speaker 5: the right to remain silent. Somebody shoot me, and you know,
Speaker 5: drawing all the attention to himself.
Speaker 2: Yes, that was I think the most suspicious thing about
Speaker 2: all this. It's like he was he was you know,
Speaker 2: I'm the one who did Everybody rushed around, everybody on
Speaker 2: the spot because the police started carrying him off, thought
Speaker 2: that maybe he was the one who had done it.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 5: I mean, at the very least they need to re
Speaker 5: arrest this guy and charge him as an accessory after
Speaker 5: the fact that he's not involved with it, because if
Speaker 5: you're trying to help this guy escape, that itself is
Speaker 5: a serious crime, even if you had no prior knowledge.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, that's right.
Speaker 4: A Culty sim Also, headlines are made in newspapers before
Speaker 4: the shooting. I lost the link. Interesting. If you find
Speaker 4: the link, you send it on over KWD sixty eight.
Speaker 4: Charlie Kirk made some statements against Israel in recent months.
Speaker 4: Masad murdered him, and he puts the link there Rumble
Speaker 4: dot com Charlie Kirk Chilie warning if I'm assassinated, it
Speaker 4: will be Israel. Yeah, I actually saw him questioning Israel.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I saw some people saying that he was questioning
Speaker 5: him that. I didn't believe it at first, because every
Speaker 5: clip i'd ever seen Charlie Kirk, he's always been very
Speaker 5: pro Israel, but he had a few clips criticizing them
Speaker 5: and questioning him.
Speaker 2: Yeah. We even't played that clip a couple of weeks
Speaker 2: ago that somebody put up portraying him as the ultimate
Speaker 2: apologist for Israel in a satirical way. And again, I
Speaker 2: didn't follow Charlie Kirk that closely. I don't follow anybody
Speaker 2: that closely in terms of their comments on things. But yeah,
Speaker 2: that I mean, if they're going to when you look
Speaker 2: at the history of this organization that's there, you look
Speaker 2: at Masad, look at the IDEF, you look at what
Speaker 2: they're doing in Gaza, they're capable of anything. Frankly, Yeah,
Speaker 2: and I don't know they did it. That doesn't mean
Speaker 2: they did it, but I do know they're capable of it.
Speaker 4: They're capable of it, and they have a long history
Speaker 4: of killing.
Speaker 2: People, as is the US government.
Speaker 4: There's a long list of suspects, you.
Speaker 2: Know, if it fit their agenda. I wouldn't be surprised
Speaker 2: if the Trump administration had him killed if it fit
Speaker 2: their agenda. You know what I'm saying. I mean, if
Speaker 2: they wanted to use him for some purpose. Is death
Speaker 2: for some purpose. That's what I think of the Trump administration.
Speaker 2: That's my low opinion of them. I think that they
Speaker 2: have no moral restraints. Certainly there's no legal restraints. They
Speaker 2: brag about that.
Speaker 5: Yeah, we wouldn't put it past them on a moral standpoint.
Speaker 5: It's just strange to me, Like what I was just saying,
Speaker 5: how with most false flag attacks, there's a clear narrative
Speaker 5: that they're ready to push right from the moment it happens. Yeah,
Speaker 5: they've got the guy, they've got his motive, and they've
Speaker 5: got the solution ready.
Speaker 2: To go, as it did with nine to eleven. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: we know it's I saw Bin Lawden, good old tim Osman.
Speaker 4: Can think the recovered rifle does that match the photo
Speaker 4: of the rooftop shooter. I haven't seen any photos of it.
Speaker 4: I'd be very curious if you're able to find some photos, Lance,
Speaker 4: please pull him up. Guard Goldsmith. If in New York
Speaker 4: and LA Times really had been reporting that Charlie Kirk
Speaker 4: was shot prior to the event, those reports would have
Speaker 4: been everywhere, and Kirk supporters would have been appropriately excoriating him.
Speaker 4: I agree, that's kind of my opinion on it. I
Speaker 4: think these were probably generated for clicks.
Speaker 2: Yeah, when you look at how you know, when the
Speaker 2: reports were Charlie Kirk shot, I mean that was like
Speaker 2: everybody knows who Charlie Kirk is. I mean there's even
Speaker 2: one of the reactions that I have here is someone
Speaker 2: in the UK talking about their young son and how
Speaker 2: he knew about Charlie Kirk. He was so well known
Speaker 2: that anybody, any major paper reporting something.
Speaker 4: That goes everywhere all at once. Yeah, you'll see these occasionally,
Speaker 4: good point guard. You'll see these occasionally fake headlines where
Speaker 4: it's you know, certain celebrity dies and they get traction
Speaker 4: for yeah, a few hours, maybe a full day before
Speaker 4: the celebrity comes out and says I'm alive.
Speaker 3: Guys.
Speaker 4: So even when it's obviously fake stuff, something like that
Speaker 4: explodes and it becomes fairly big news, and someone like
Speaker 4: Charlie Kirk, as you saw the second it happened, it
Speaker 4: was everywhere, so a report on it, even if it
Speaker 4: was fake, would have immediately come out and it would
Speaker 4: have been you know, Kirk would have made a statement,
Speaker 4: I'm not dead, I'm still going yeah, and his fans,
Speaker 4: as Guard points out, would have been screaming at the
Speaker 4: New York and La Times Bille Houghton. When Trump's FBI
Speaker 4: moves Gilain Maxwell to a country club prison, that speaks
Speaker 4: volumes yeah, and that does We're all dead. There are
Speaker 4: about five thousand red flags in the shooting. Everyone needs
Speaker 4: to calm down. One thing I think it's important to
Speaker 4: remember is that it takes a crazy person to do
Speaker 4: something like this. Every assassination is going to have weird
Speaker 4: things around it, because to do this sort of thing,
Speaker 4: you've got to be a weird individual, to say the least.
Speaker 4: So just always remember that well balanced, normal people who
Speaker 4: do well balanced normal things don't commit murder and assassination.
Speaker 4: So there's always going to be very strange happenings around
Speaker 4: it because it's done by very strange, very disturbing.
Speaker 2: There was always a problem I had within a sanity plea, right,
Speaker 2: it's like, okay, so you know you're admitting that you
Speaker 2: kill this person, but you are insane, maybe temporarily even,
Speaker 2: which is even more ridiculous, And it's like murder by
Speaker 2: definition is insanity so what is new about this and
Speaker 2: how is that an excuse?
Speaker 4: Yeah, yes, you are insane and we don't want you
Speaker 4: back out on the street again. I don't fault anyone
Speaker 4: for whatever they believe about the shooting. There have been
Speaker 4: so many lives by the government and the media about
Speaker 4: everything all the time that every theory to me is
Speaker 4: still somewhat on the table. Well maybe not every theory,
Speaker 4: but I haven't seen anyone that has been completely and
Speaker 4: utterly outrageous. Biel hoton which I already read that one.
Speaker 4: We are all read that one. Jerry Alatalo are in
Speaker 4: a stage of j Casey's book is self published.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Amazon makes it very very easy to self publish books now,
Speaker 4: so you don't have to go through a publishing company,
Speaker 4: which means that there is about a million different AI
Speaker 4: generated slop books that show up a day on Amazon.
Speaker 4: They're continually just churning out the lowest effort, you know,
Speaker 4: chat GBT give me this, and they just line by line,
Speaker 4: you know, passage by passage. I have chat GBT basically
Speaker 4: spit out a book and then slap it directly onto Amazon.
Speaker 4: There's again thousands upon thousands on thousands of them, and
Speaker 4: there's more every day. It's really really easy apparently to
Speaker 4: get a book on Amazon.
Speaker 5: Yeah, and I clicked through the link that he sent,
Speaker 5: and interestingly, this shows that it was published on September tenth.
Speaker 5: And like you said, with AI, if you don't care
Speaker 5: about the quality, you can spit one of these things
Speaker 5: out in less than a day.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 5: I've seen YouTube videos of people looking at actually published
Speaker 5: books that some people have purchased, and it's like, this
Speaker 5: is clearly just the pure output from an AI. They
Speaker 5: didn't edit it at all. It's got chapters that are
Speaker 5: basically the exact same thing over and over again.
Speaker 2: So it showed that it was published the day of
Speaker 2: the shooting, out of the day.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that link shows it published day of which again,
Speaker 4: this could be a probably was going to be a
Speaker 4: very short book based on the fact. And with AI
Speaker 4: you could get it to spit out something like that
Speaker 4: incredibly quickly, just summarize all the news events for you
Speaker 4: and slam it into a book. Can thank prediction the
Speaker 4: suspect doesn't live long enough to testify under oath, that
Speaker 4: is something, you know.
Speaker 2: That's all we saw with I. Remember I was young,
Speaker 2: when I was like eight years old, I think when
Speaker 2: Kennedy was shot, and it was right Thanksgiving, so our
Speaker 2: extended families together, So we had a lot of people
Speaker 2: that were there when Lee Harvey Oswald was shot by
Speaker 2: Jack Ruby to keep him quiet, and that was such
Speaker 2: a wake up call to everyone and that generation and
Speaker 2: everyone in my family. I mean, they were all talking
Speaker 2: about that. That's when when I became a conspiracy theorist.
Speaker 2: But the you know now they have typically if they've
Speaker 2: got like some kind of an mk ultra shoot or
Speaker 2: something like that, they'll make sure that they killed themselves
Speaker 2: so that it doesn't.
Speaker 4: They'll bring someone like Jolly West in to make sure
Speaker 4: you end up offing yourself, yeah, Jack.
Speaker 2: Or at the side of the crime or something you
Speaker 2: know that is less suspicious to the public than the
Speaker 2: Jack Ruby versus Lee Harvey Olswald. That type of thing.
Speaker 2: That is a real tip off to everybody when they
Speaker 2: do that.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Brian de McCartney. And they plant weird things to
Speaker 4: throw you off the trail too. Yeah, there's always strange things,
Speaker 4: don't frag me, bro. The entire power structure has a
Speaker 4: reason to murder anyone with real influence that can undermine
Speaker 4: their grand narrative. And ultimate goals, not just Israel. That's right,
Speaker 4: it's true. It's true, Star Barkley. You can very clearly
Speaker 4: see he has a gun in a cover. He put
Speaker 4: the gun down and then jumped with it. You can
Speaker 4: see it very clearly. You can see he injured himself.
Speaker 4: He's limping. I need to see a more upclose version.
Speaker 4: Note I haven't been able to actually watch it on
Speaker 4: a large monitor. It's a bit far away. But I'll
Speaker 4: have to look at that. If you say you can
Speaker 4: see the gun there, I'm not going to dispute it.
Speaker 4: I need to take a closer look. Frodo lives outlaw, order, outlaw,
Speaker 4: out door political events.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 4: No more being out in the sun. You must huddle
Speaker 4: in your basements. Stealth patriot. Charlie was doing it at schools,
Speaker 4: too much of a threat to the system.
Speaker 2: That's I had a clip that I wanted to show
Speaker 2: him engaging the student audience, and I couldn't go back
Speaker 2: and find it. And it was, you know, he would
Speaker 2: take questions from the audience. There was one guy said,
Speaker 2: what credentials do you have to even talk about economics?
Speaker 2: And he asked the guy, he says, so you said, yeah,
Speaker 2: I'm an economics student. So he say, you know, if
Speaker 2: Milton Friedman is he No, I don't know. Do you
Speaker 2: know where little Big Who, Little Gig von Misus is
Speaker 2: or f A Hyak? And he starts going down this
Speaker 2: whole list, most of them free market or Austrian economists.
Speaker 2: He had never heard of them. Finally he got to
Speaker 2: but he mentioned some other economists. He only got to
Speaker 2: John Maynard Kaynes. And of course this guy had heard
Speaker 2: about him because they hammered Keynesy and economics in the
Speaker 2: schools anything. But the guy was just such an idiot,
Speaker 2: and Charlie was proud of the fact. He goes, yeah,
Speaker 2: that's right, I don't have a college degree. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, he says, I dropped out of college,
Speaker 2: out of a junior college even, you know. So he
Speaker 2: emphasized the fact that he was self taught, but he
Speaker 2: he called himself an autodidact. He said, do you know
Speaker 2: what that means? And the guy didn't know what it means.
Speaker 2: He goes, she should look it up, you know. He said,
Speaker 2: he's self taught, but he just he was good in
Speaker 2: terms of engaging the students. It was and when you
Speaker 2: look at this the other part of it is is
Speaker 2: like this guy was the best argument for not going
Speaker 2: to college that you could have that was there, you know,
Speaker 2: studying economics, but he doesn't know a thing about it.
Speaker 2: He doesn't even know the major economists of the twenty
Speaker 2: first of the twentieth century.
Speaker 4: Yeah, KWD sixty eight. For Kirk to be in his
Speaker 4: early thirties and realized the enemy and began talking about
Speaker 4: it was admirable. He may have been a Zionist but
Speaker 4: saw the issue. He was definitely over the target. Your
Speaker 4: people are allowed to learn they were wrong. People are
Speaker 4: allowed to make mistakes, and again, don't just and if.
Speaker 2: He was starting to wait up to some of this stuff,
Speaker 2: I like, I make him a real danger to the astablishment.
Speaker 4: With a massive following he had guard Goldsmith. There's a
Speaker 4: great example of pre reporting, as we recall the real
Speaker 4: BBC reporter claiming Building seven went down twenty minutes before
Speaker 4: it did, as it stands behind her on screen.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 4: And with that, you can see those clips still are around.
Speaker 4: You can still find them. They try to scrub them,
Speaker 4: but they can't. People continually re upload them and post
Speaker 4: them places and I can't find a single actual link
Speaker 4: for these articles that people say exist. If you've got them,
Speaker 4: I'd love to see them. I'm not saying they don't exist.
Speaker 4: I'm just saying I can't find them. Star Barkley, his
Speaker 4: father turned him in one hundred thousand dollars. Richer, rich dad,
Speaker 4: poor dad. That's good, that's funny. Yeah, we're all dead.
Speaker 4: Venezuela and Brazil will be traded for Ukraine and Taiwan,
Speaker 4: according to Romberg, all right, I'll trade you my Venezuela
Speaker 4: for your Ukraine. KWD sixty eight. What was in buildings
Speaker 4: seven that it needed to be destroyed?
Speaker 2: I forget the connection to it.
Speaker 4: Didn't have records of some kind. It had a bunch
Speaker 4: of different records that they wanted gone, I believe.
Speaker 2: Yeah, something like that, just like you know, the the
Speaker 2: attack of the Pentagon happened to go right into the
Speaker 2: office that was ground zero, the office that was investigating
Speaker 2: the trillions of dollars that was lost. And you know
Speaker 2: that was really driven home to me. I've told the
Speaker 2: story before, but Karen and I were in Wimberley, Texas
Speaker 2: one time. We went down there just on a drive
Speaker 2: and we're just kind of walking around in shops and
Speaker 2: it was not tourist season or anything, and it was
Speaker 2: very empty in this one shot, and this lady wanted
Speaker 2: to talk to me while Karen was looking around at
Speaker 2: the knickknacks, and she started telling me that she was
Speaker 2: retired military and blah blah blah, and her husband was
Speaker 2: as well, and that's why they were running the shop.
Speaker 2: And she just starts monologuing and telling me her whole history. Said,
Speaker 2: you know, I was with a group that was investigated.
Speaker 2: I had been working in that same office that was
Speaker 2: hit with a plane on nine to eleven. And she said,
Speaker 2: we had found so many high ranking military and political officials,
Speaker 2: congressmen who decided they weren't going to run for reelection.
Speaker 2: They were contacted and they were given a way to
Speaker 2: just go away and not be prosecuted. And she said,
Speaker 2: we were finding so much stuff. It's so sad that
Speaker 2: that happened. And she goes and I almost died. I
Speaker 2: got out of there just a couple of weeks before
Speaker 2: that happened, and I wanted to record it, but I
Speaker 2: wanted to hear what she had to say. And I
Speaker 2: knew if I started recording her, she was going to
Speaker 2: clam up. But they really drove it home with me
Speaker 2: that that's what was really going on. So I don't
Speaker 2: know what was there in Building seven, but I'm sure
Speaker 2: they had their reasons for doing it.
Speaker 4: I saw someone say that it contained a bunch of
Speaker 4: documents about how Rumsfeld had noticed there was money missing,
Speaker 4: and that's where the documents were stored, is building seven.
Speaker 2: Oh so it's connected to that as well.
Speaker 4: Yeah, this seems like KBD sixty eight. The CIA created
Speaker 4: the term conspiracy theorist was developed after jfkssh The jfk
Speaker 4: assassination has been a good armor for them.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's it. They gotta have that term. Well, okay,
Speaker 2: so we're going to we talked about September eleventh, so
Speaker 2: let's talk about Charlie Kirk. When come back. We're gonna
Speaker 2: take a quick break and we'll be right back.
Speaker 8: H m hm hm.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Well, we're seeing amazing reactions. As you said yesterday, Travis,
Speaker 2: you know, the testable comments on social media, people cheering
Speaker 2: the fact that Charlie Kirk was killed. We've had some
Speaker 2: people now have been fired for that and not fired
Speaker 2: because they're trying to cover up some narrative or something,
Speaker 2: but fired because you know they're cheering this horrific, gruesome
Speaker 2: murder of a young man with a young family. And
Speaker 2: here in Tennessee at a Tennessee University assistant dean who
Speaker 2: said that Charlie Kirk spoke his fate into existence. This
Speaker 2: is Laura sash Lightsey, assistant dean of students at Middle
Speaker 2: Tennessee State University, and posted that on Facebook and said
Speaker 2: she had zero sympathy. Now she has zero career, which
Speaker 2: is fine with me. I mean, we don't need these
Speaker 2: kind of deranged, hateful people running the universities. That's why
Speaker 2: the universities are the way that they are. She then
Speaker 2: subsequently deleted her entire Facebook account, was too late. People
Speaker 2: had grabbed it, and Senator Marshall Blackburn, who represents Tennessee,
Speaker 2: called for her to be fired. So she needs to
Speaker 2: be fired tomorrow, and she was. School officials fired her
Speaker 2: from their position there. And then we have Governor Pritzker
Speaker 2: who blames Trump after Kirk assassinates said it's the President's
Speaker 2: rhetoric that often femits violence. Now I find it interesting,
Speaker 2: and that's one of the reasons why I opened the
Speaker 2: show with this unprovoked attack on a Venezuelan boat that
Speaker 2: Trump and everybody in his administration bragged about. Do you
Speaker 2: find it interesting that Pritzker would not attack Trump on that,
Speaker 2: but would attack him on his rhetoric, saying that his
Speaker 2: rhetoric had led people to react to try hardly correct
Speaker 2: that way, as if speech justified that kind of violence.
Speaker 2: That's the mindset of the left. They're not going to
Speaker 2: push back against an egregious war crime and violation of
Speaker 2: the Constitution. What they'll do is they'll use this to
Speaker 2: push back against free speech.
Speaker 4: I also, I'm sorry to break in, but I am
Speaker 4: so incredibly sick and tired of this rhetoric of them saying, well,
Speaker 4: you know, he said hateful things, and you know that
Speaker 4: maybe you know when you talk like this. They have
Speaker 4: spent ten years demonizing anyone that disagrees with them as hateful,
Speaker 4: racist Nazis, and they continually say, you know, you should
Speaker 4: kill Nazis. That's what they say. They say, you're a
Speaker 4: Nazi and that Nazis should be killed, and therefore they
Speaker 4: are co signing the death of anyone they slap that
Speaker 4: label onto. Yeah, they have pushed this rhetoric, you're.
Speaker 2: A terrorist, So therefore we can kill you without even
Speaker 2: showing that you're committed a crime. So as the labels
Speaker 2: are very very important to them.
Speaker 5: Yes, you're probably going to get to this later. But
Speaker 5: the guy that worked at d C Comics that was
Speaker 5: celebrating this and got fired. I saw someone post something
Speaker 5: about I think it's a guy that's putting to be
Speaker 5: a girl. But this person's Twitter feed is their handle
Speaker 5: is punching Nazis all day. That's that's the only thing
Speaker 5: these they're so heavily propagandized that anyone they don't agree
Speaker 5: with is a Nazi, and punching and violence against Nazis
Speaker 5: is a good thing.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, What Lance was talking about is the guy
Speaker 2: that was working for DC Comics and he had just
Speaker 2: done completed a series called the Red Hood series. The
Speaker 2: first one had been sold, and he came out, you know,
Speaker 2: bragging about them. And he's a trainee, came out bragging
Speaker 2: about this, and so DC just canned the whole series
Speaker 2: and said book dealers out there, if you've got pre
Speaker 2: orders for volume number two and three, those are canceled
Speaker 2: right now. But you know what we're seeing here, as
Speaker 2: you point out, it's this idea that if they don't
Speaker 2: like what you say, they label you as a Nazi,
Speaker 2: and if the right doesn't like what you say, they
Speaker 2: label you as a terrorist. Evidently, so it's the censorship
Speaker 2: is the issue. The censorship is hate, which leads to
Speaker 2: violence on people. They want to say, however, that speech
Speaker 2: is hate and speech is violence, I say, is the opposite.
Speaker 2: I say that the instinct to censor people it comes
Speaker 2: from a position of hate, which can then lead to violence,
Speaker 2: and it can be state violence against people as well.
Speaker 2: I think they got it exactly backwards. But I think
Speaker 2: it's interesting that Pritzker would talk about this because again,
Speaker 2: it's all about politics. It's not about principles of the
Speaker 2: rule of law anywhere. And as they point out in Breitbart, meanwhile,
Speaker 2: there have been eleven hundred and fifty two people shot
Speaker 2: in Chicago so far this year, two hundred and eight
Speaker 2: of them died. That's on top of the twy four
Speaker 2: hundred and forty four shot and the six hundred and
Speaker 2: ten murdered just last year, along with similar records each
Speaker 2: year of the last ten years. Charlie Kirk himself even
Speaker 2: warned of the assassination culture that has sprung up on
Speaker 2: the left, leading to many regular, average everyday Democrats to
Speaker 2: say that political violence, in murdering your political opponent, is
Speaker 2: a legitimate tactic. And I think it is inevitable that
Speaker 2: that kind of mindset is going to come out of
Speaker 2: a mindset that wants to censor any speech that it hates.
Speaker 2: That's what leads to the violence that is there, he said.
Speaker 2: In April, he said assassination culture is spreading on the left.
Speaker 2: Forty eight percent of liberals say that it would be
Speaker 2: at least somewhat justified to murder Elon. Fifty five percent
Speaker 2: said the same thing about Donald Trump. And of course,
Speaker 2: all it takes is one to kill you, which is
Speaker 2: what happened with Charlie Kirk. Barack Obama condemns the despicable
Speaker 2: violence after Charlie Kirk was assassinated. That's the headline from Breitbart.
Speaker 2: But the interesting thing is he says, this kind of
Speaker 2: despicable violence has no place in our democracy. But he
Speaker 2: pretends that he doesn't really know why this happened. He said,
Speaker 2: we don't yet know what motivated the person who shot
Speaker 2: and killed Charlie Kirk. Oh, we don't. This is kind
Speaker 2: of like what you see when you got somebody with
Speaker 2: a knife stabbing a dozen people, yelling alhu aakbar, and
Speaker 2: we say we don't know what motivated him cut all
Speaker 2: that is kind of ridiculous. Lefties run to social media
Speaker 2: mocking Charlie Kirk for opposing gun control and putting up
Speaker 2: things like if only we had gun control. He fought
Speaker 2: hard for guns and prayers and so forth. We wanted
Speaker 2: gun control to save him, to save his life too.
Speaker 2: Some of them said, no, you.
Speaker 4: Wanted gun control so you could more easily take people
Speaker 4: like Charlie Kirk, round them up and put them wherever
Speaker 4: you wanted.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 4: These people want to act sanctimonious, but the fact that
Speaker 4: they are acting this way shows what their true feelings are.
Speaker 4: They wanted Charlie Kirk dead, and if the Second Amendment
Speaker 4: wasn't there, they would be acting upon those urges. They
Speaker 4: would be screaming at their representatives to round up people
Speaker 4: like Kirk, round up people like us and you and chat. Yeah,
Speaker 4: the Second Amendment is the only thing stopping these people
Speaker 4: from acting out on their completely hateful, violent urges, and
Speaker 4: their reactions prove it.
Speaker 2: Another interesting thing here is you know which people haven't
Speaker 2: talked about. People have talked about, well, you know the
Speaker 2: Israeli connection, maybe they would do something. Well, the Ukrainians,
Speaker 2: many of them, were celebrating online, calling it epic. As
Speaker 2: a matter of fact, one user wrote that and said
Speaker 2: the moment that he was hit by a bullet. Another
Speaker 2: one said cool, super shot. First he rooted for Russia
Speaker 2: and now he is dead. Well, the reality is is
Speaker 2: that he'd been very critical of Zelensky, and justifiably so.
Speaker 2: He called him an international welfare queen, and he's exactly right,
Speaker 2: an ungrateful, petulant child responsible for a million dead, citing
Speaker 2: Zelensky's refusal to consider peace deal with Russia and his
Speaker 2: continuation of a conflict financed by Western money. And so
Speaker 2: these Ukrainians are saying, well, he left around and he
Speaker 2: found out and wishing him to rest in pieces, but
Speaker 2: he wants questioned whether or not the Ukrainians would try
Speaker 2: to kill him because they had a hit list of
Speaker 2: people who had opposed continuing funding of the Ukrainian War
Speaker 2: by the US government, and one person in particular who
Speaker 2: was not only pushing for the Ukrainian War but also
Speaker 2: was a transgender, the ex head of the Ukrainian Territorial
Speaker 2: Defense's English language propaganda vowed to hunt down those he
Speaker 2: called Krimlin propagandists. They say she, but it was a
Speaker 2: guy pretending that he was a woman, adding that a
Speaker 2: strike against an individual favored by Putin was imminent. And
Speaker 2: so Kirk asked in response to that, he said, so
Speaker 2: are they going to try to murder Steve Bannon or
Speaker 2: Tucker Carlson or me? And that was not that long ago.
Speaker 2: He said, None of us are Putin puppets or Russian propagandists.
Speaker 2: But the New York Times calls us that, Twitter calls
Speaker 2: us that, and that person, who by the way, was
Speaker 2: a transgender is who is funded by the US Treasury,
Speaker 2: says we are going to come murder you. And so
Speaker 2: they were getting American government to create a money to
Speaker 2: create a hit list of their political enemies. And then
Speaker 2: on Blue Sky, there are a lot of stuff.
Speaker 4: There which that's their walled garden where the liberals are
Speaker 4: in their own little enclave and they can feel safe
Speaker 4: to say whatever they want.
Speaker 2: Yeah, an echo chamber of hate. And again ironically Blue
Speaker 2: Sky threatened to sense of the people who want to
Speaker 2: censor everybody else over this thirty eight million users. According
Speaker 2: to the platforms cardinal directions, any of the thirty eight
Speaker 2: million users who violated the policy to celebrate Kirk's assassination
Speaker 2: or to promote violence against political activists could have their
Speaker 2: accounts suspended or removed from Blue Sky. And they were
Speaker 2: not the only social media place to do that. Had
Speaker 2: met a YouTube. Reddit discored all issued statements like that.
Speaker 2: X did not, and so you were able to see
Speaker 2: quite a bit of that on X. Yeah, and the
Speaker 2: view actually was civil in this. That was of the
Speaker 2: biggest surprises to make was that the people in the view,
Speaker 2: who are usually so toxic and deranged and uninformed, were
Speaker 2: actually compassionate about this.
Speaker 4: This army wonders how much of that is just real.
Speaker 4: Someone has pulled the cork on this, that someone has
Speaker 4: made it so that, maybe, you know, political commentators are
Speaker 4: now fair game, maybe for civil Someone on the right
Speaker 4: isn't going to accept those terms of engagement. Yeah, and
Speaker 4: I think, thankfully the right isn't going to because the
Speaker 4: right is generally filled with a more Christian and more
Speaker 4: moral people, and I hope they don't.
Speaker 2: Well, we did have some crazy on the right who
Speaker 2: went up to the House of the Minnesota speaker of
Speaker 2: the House and shot her and her husband. Yes On MSNBC,
Speaker 2: Matthew Dowd, who had perhaps the most idiotic and vile
Speaker 2: comments of all, Right, off the bat has now been
Speaker 2: fired even by MSNBC the bat. He said, he's been
Speaker 2: one of the most divisive, especially divisive younger figures in
Speaker 2: this He was constantly sort of pushing this sort of
Speaker 2: hate speech or sort of aimed at certain groups. Hateful
Speaker 2: thoughts lead the hateful words, which lead to hateful actions.
Speaker 2: Said you can't stop this with all sorts of awful
Speaker 2: thoughts that you have, and so forth, and so For that,
Speaker 2: he was fired. But he was also the one who
Speaker 2: came out idiotically said, well, we don't know at this
Speaker 2: point what happened. Could have been some of his supporters
Speaker 2: firing off guns and celebration. We talked about that. It's like,
Speaker 2: since when have you ever seen anything?
Speaker 4: Maybe he saw Yosemite sam in the audience or something,
Speaker 4: you know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Well, he says that people misread his comments. He
Speaker 2: apologize for it, but he has now been justfully fired.
Speaker 2: MSNBC president Rebecca Cutler said, during your breaking news coverage
Speaker 2: or the shooting of Charlie Kirk, Matthew Dowd made comments
Speaker 2: that were inappropriate and sensitive unacceptable. We apologize for his statements,
Speaker 2: as has he. There is no place for violence in America,
Speaker 2: she said, and so I still avista to him. But Cindral,
Speaker 2: Elizabeth Warren and Jen Saki, the former Biden spokesman, suggested
Speaker 2: that it was due to Charlie Kirk not turning down
Speaker 2: his rhetoric, which, as we point out, we thought was
Speaker 2: somewhat moderate.
Speaker 4: I've never I've never seen Charlie Kirk say anything that
Speaker 4: I thought was even in the slightest bit extreme.
Speaker 2: And on the House of the speak on the house floor,
Speaker 2: you had an interesting telling moment because you know, after
Speaker 2: the shooting at the school, Democrats were routinely mocking people
Speaker 2: who said, well, pray for them, and even the mother
Speaker 2: of one of the children who did not die, but
Speaker 2: her child was shot, and she mocked the whole idea
Speaker 2: of prayer. Well, you had Mike Johnson held a moment
Speaker 2: of silence for Charlie Kirk, and then when that moment
Speaker 2: was over, you had Lauren Bobert requested a moment of
Speaker 2: prayer out loud, not of silence, and when she said that,
Speaker 2: she said, silent prayer gets silent results. I think that,
Speaker 2: you know, if you are ashamed to mention the name
Speaker 2: of Christ, don't expect that your prayers are going to
Speaker 2: be heard. She said, Is there someone who could lead
Speaker 2: us in a moment of prayer out loud for Charlie
Speaker 2: and his family? And then the Democrats had a fit
Speaker 2: and they started shouting on the floor, groaning about that,
Speaker 2: and you know, saying shut up. I mean, that's that's
Speaker 2: the state of the of the Democrat Party. They have
Speaker 2: made themselves the Antichrist party.
Speaker 4: Really makes you wonder who else recoils at the name
Speaker 4: of Jesus, you know, yeah, it really makes you think.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so it's like a vampire movie, isn't it. Charlie
Speaker 2: Kirk's five most controversial claims, from vaccine conspiracy to public executions.
Speaker 2: And again, as we said, we thought that, you know,
Speaker 2: he was pretty pretty mild in these things in terms
Speaker 2: of done.
Speaker 5: Do you want me to play the video from this
Speaker 5: article of we'll call for prayer?
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I'll tell you that. Yeah, we.
Speaker 7: The house will be an order, we will join for
Speaker 7: prayer right after this.
Speaker 4: Okay, the chair.
Speaker 7: Lays before the House of Communication, the House will be
Speaker 7: an order.
Speaker 2: The demonic party is.
Speaker 5: Beginning.
Speaker 4: I can go back to this.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's okay, we'll move on, thank you. It was
Speaker 2: Kirk was a huge support of the Second Amendment, and
Speaker 2: he believed that people being killed is a price that
Speaker 2: we pay for the Second Amendment. I would disagree with
Speaker 2: him on that. That is not the issue. And it's
Speaker 2: sad that he would couch it that way because guns
Speaker 2: have always been more ubiquitous, more omnipresent, uh in my
Speaker 2: life than now, and yet what has changed. We didn't
Speaker 2: have that kind of violence. So we are the ones
Speaker 2: who have changed, not the guns. And so he was
Speaker 2: wrong in saying that it's worth it to have a
Speaker 2: the cost of unfortunately some gun desks every single year
Speaker 2: so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect
Speaker 2: our other God given rights.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean, look at Britain with all the stabbings.
Speaker 3: Yeah, what rights.
Speaker 5: Are the you know what advantage a getting from not
Speaker 5: having gun rights with you know, stabbings everywhere. It's not
Speaker 5: a matter of oh, well there'll be more deaths with guns,
Speaker 5: but hey, that's worth it. It's simply a.
Speaker 2: Well they're putting this here saying that there was a
Speaker 2: trade off somehow, there is not a trade off. The
Speaker 2: problem is and many of us have said this over
Speaker 2: in Oregon. As a matter of fact, rf K Junior
Speaker 2: said that he said, you know, he's a when he
Speaker 2: was in high school, people are bringing guns to school
Speaker 2: because they're doing target shooting and things like that. So
Speaker 2: what has changed not the gun. The Second Amendment doesn't
Speaker 2: need to change. We need to look at what has
Speaker 2: changed in our culture. And of course that is the
Speaker 2: schools that is purging God out of our schools as
Speaker 2: they want him purged out of the house of the
Speaker 2: house floor. And so that's what's changed, along with the
Speaker 2: fact that we have SSRI drugs that they prescribe for
Speaker 2: people and the grooming of children to tell them they're
Speaker 2: in the wrong body, getting them confused, depressed, suicidal, then
Speaker 2: giving them SSRI tr drugs. So we need to focus
Speaker 2: on what the real problem is. He refused to accept
Speaker 2: transgender people they say or that a person could identify
Speaker 2: as a different gender than the one that they're born with.
Speaker 2: So he believed that people who were transgender had a
Speaker 2: mental illness and needed brain treatment. Well he was right
Speaker 2: about that.
Speaker 4: Once again. The standard line was in the you know
Speaker 4: psychological Diagnostic manual for decades and only very recently when
Speaker 4: it no longer served them and this became the hot
Speaker 4: button issue. Did they change it? They will. Language doesn't
Speaker 4: mean anything to liberals or democrats. Words don't have any meaning.
Speaker 4: It is simply a weapon to achieve whatever their goal
Speaker 4: is at the moment. And they will change the definition
Speaker 4: on the fly. And if you point it out that
Speaker 4: they've changed it, they'll call you an idiot.
Speaker 2: That's postmodernism. You know that there is no truth and
Speaker 2: words don't mean anything. Here's the issue, right, Yeah, we
Speaker 2: know that transgenderism is insanity. You've got institutions that are
Speaker 2: pushing insanity in pharmacyceuticals on kids. The institutions have to
Speaker 2: change or be abolished. It's just that simple. We need
Speaker 2: to declare our independence from the educational institution because and again,
Speaker 2: just like it says in that question of independence, the
Speaker 2: schools need to be radically altered or abolished. I'm in
Speaker 2: favor of them being abolished. No one government should have
Speaker 2: no role in education. He won't say that now.
Speaker 4: No one can teach your children better than you, No
Speaker 4: one will love your children like you do. You are,
Speaker 4: You cannot do a worse job, and you can do
Speaker 4: an infinitely better job than these schools and what we've seen.
Speaker 4: I've seen so many posts of teachers celebrating the death
Speaker 4: of Charlie Kirk. Do you think that your conservative child
Speaker 4: is going to be treated well by these hateful, demonic
Speaker 4: people that are infesting the school system?
Speaker 2: Christian? Your Christian child? Do you want your Christian child
Speaker 2: absorbing those kinds of values being mentored by people.
Speaker 4: They're going to be targeted, not just by other children
Speaker 4: for potential bullying, but by the staff of the school themselves.
Speaker 4: They are going to suffer. You can no longer entrust
Speaker 4: your children to the school system, not that I think
Speaker 4: you ever should have, but today it is more obvious
Speaker 4: than ever that it is filled with people that hate
Speaker 4: you and hate people like you.
Speaker 2: So again this is coming from the Mirror in the UK.
Speaker 2: They say he was a conspiracy theorist. During the COVID
Speaker 2: nineteen pandemic. He regularly shared conspiracy theories on social media,
Speaker 2: which let him being banned for a time from Twitter
Speaker 2: for misinformation. He used to catchphrase China virus. He said, no,
Speaker 2: now more than ever, we need the wall with China
Speaker 2: virus spreading across the globe. The US stands a chance
Speaker 2: if we can control our borders. President Trump is making
Speaker 2: it happen again. He's sharing Trump in the middle of
Speaker 2: the pandemic. This is why I said, I have some
Speaker 2: issues with him, and I think that, you know, to
Speaker 2: think that Trump was fixing the border was delusional and extreme,
Speaker 2: I think. And then polarizing quotes. He said, I'm sorry,
Speaker 2: if I see a black pilot, I'm going to be
Speaker 2: like boy, I hope he's qualified. But she said during
Speaker 2: a twenty twenty four podcasts where he was probably talking
Speaker 2: about DEI. That's not anything that hasn't been said over
Speaker 2: and over again by Walter Williams when he used to
Speaker 2: guest hosts for Rush Limbaugh. You know, he would say,
Speaker 2: as a black man, he felt that the affirmative action,
Speaker 2: which is what DEI is the successor to. He said,
Speaker 2: he earned his degree, but people think that he got
Speaker 2: his degree simply because he was given a lower standard
Speaker 2: because he was black, And Walter Williams spoke out against that,
Speaker 2: essentially saying the same thing. So again they're trying to
Speaker 2: portray him as a racist. They work that way because
Speaker 2: they went to that is their standard defense is to
Speaker 2: bring the accusation of racism to anybody that they disagree with.
Speaker 2: It's exactly what Israel is doing too. So in February
Speaker 2: last year, while discussing capital punishment, he said children should
Speaker 2: watch people being killed using the death penalty, That executions
Speaker 2: should be public, death penalty should be public, should be quick,
Speaker 2: should be telewised. I think at a certain age it's
Speaker 2: an initiation, he said, before adding that the crime rate
Speaker 2: would go down if kids had witnessed an execution. Well, again,
Speaker 2: that's something that I would disagree with him on, but
Speaker 2: you know, you know the reason that they're putting that there.
Speaker 2: We're going to take a quick break and we're going
Speaker 2: to come back in just a moment here. Actually, no, wait,
Speaker 2: we're going to take a break.
Speaker 4: Closson on the line.
Speaker 5: No, he hasn't joined yet.
Speaker 2: Okay, well then why don't we continue instead of taking
Speaker 2: a break? Is going to take a breakwak You have a.
Speaker 4: Good comment here, though, Ratis Bros. Says one of the
Speaker 4: positives about the shooting is that someone is really showing
Speaker 4: how useless the FBI is if it isn't planned by them. Lol,
Speaker 4: that's right, unless they're the ones who set everything up
Speaker 4: and put all the pieces in place. Apparently they can't
Speaker 4: find the guy.
Speaker 2: That's another good point, because Cash Betel wounded up with
Speaker 2: a gun his face two.
Speaker 4: Or three times.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I know.
Speaker 4: I mean you could also see that with the unibomber.
Speaker 4: They had no idea who Ted Kazinski was. They had
Speaker 4: no clue, They weren't even close. And took his brother
Speaker 4: reading his writing and saying, oh, no, I recognized this.
Speaker 4: It was the phrase cool headed logicians that Ted Kazinski
Speaker 4: frequently used around his brother and used in the writing,
Speaker 4: and his brother recognized it.
Speaker 2: And yeah, a family member who turns the men. Yeah,
Speaker 2: just like with this that maybe.
Speaker 5: Yeah, someone already mentioned Richard Jewel. There was a great
Speaker 5: movie about that made I think was directed by Clint Eastward.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Yeah, everyone should check that out. Get an idea of
Speaker 5: how these investigations go.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they worked really hard. It was an organized campaign
Speaker 2: to keep people from watching it, claiming that Clint Eastwood
Speaker 2: was just respectful to women because of one of the
Speaker 2: characters there. And so again I think it was pretty effective.
Speaker 2: But it was an excellent movie and certainly something that's
Speaker 2: an important point of view. Well, it feels like some
Speaker 2: sort of invisible line has been crossed. As Constantin Kissin
Speaker 2: has pointed out, who is a commentator on a podcast
Speaker 2: called trigger Anometry, said, I'm who, I'm wrong, But tonight
Speaker 2: it feels like some sort of invisible line has been
Speaker 2: crossed that we didn't know was there. Last time, I
Speaker 2: felt like this was nine to one one. It was clear,
Speaker 2: without knowing the how and the what, that the world
Speaker 2: was about to change forever, like the rules of the
Speaker 2: game had been permanently altered and there was simply no
Speaker 2: going back to the innocent, peaceful past. I didn't feel
Speaker 2: like this when an attempt was made on President Trump's life,
Speaker 2: he said, Yeah, it's because it looked like it was fake.
Speaker 2: To me, I don't know how he could recover from
Speaker 2: a graze to his ear that he claimed that he
Speaker 2: had so quickly like that. But to murder a young
Speaker 2: father simply for doing debates and mobilizing young people to
Speaker 2: vote for a party that represents half of America, this
Speaker 2: is something else, he said. And I agree, and that
Speaker 2: maybe I want strong arguments to say that it was engineered.
Speaker 2: I don't know if it was or if it was
Speaker 2: the you know, certainly this even if it was organic
Speaker 2: and as a result of this person's trainee mindset. You know,
Speaker 2: with all the stuff that's there that in and of itself, folks,
Speaker 2: is engineered, no question about it. Why don't we address
Speaker 2: the root cause of that.
Speaker 4: So, Yeah, basically, every mass shooting is MK ultra in
Speaker 4: the sense that they have used these techniques that they
Speaker 4: refined on the individual and rolled them out on mass
Speaker 4: through media and through the amount of drugs that they
Speaker 4: push on people continually. That was a hallmark of MK ultra.
Speaker 4: They would show you programming, they would hit you with
Speaker 4: all kinds of different techniques to induce fear or other things,
Speaker 4: and they would pump you full of drugs. And that
Speaker 4: is what happens on a mass scale to the American people.
Speaker 2: Daily, especially the schools. Schools are a mass market of
Speaker 2: MK ultra. Yeah, applied in a massive way. Well, this
Speaker 2: person said, it seems like we're entering an era of
Speaker 2: heightened political violence, and that seems to be the reaction
Speaker 2: of politicians canceling as you point out outdoor rallies and
Speaker 2: a lot of other things like that. It is profoundly
Speaker 2: disturbing and it may have consequences that we cannot yet know.
Speaker 2: I would just say wait until Trump goes to war
Speaker 2: with the drug cartels that the war on drugs has created,
Speaker 2: just like they created al Capone's gang. You're going to
Speaker 2: start to see assassinations like people have been seeing for
Speaker 2: a long time in Mexico, and imagine what's going to
Speaker 2: happen with that. And I think that is one of
Speaker 2: the things that's going to come out of the extra
Speaker 2: legal war on drugs as it goes hot instead of
Speaker 2: a cold war. He took young people seriously, saw college
Speaker 2: campuses as the ideological incubators that they are for both
Speaker 2: good ideas and for toxic ones. While will the many
Speaker 2: MSNBC pundits who said nasty things face any potent political consequences.
Speaker 2: One has been fired, but the mass just keeps slipping
Speaker 2: every time this kind of thing happens. A few months ago,
Speaker 2: a free Palestiner named Elias Rodriguez murder too young Israeli
Speaker 2: embassy staffers on the eve of their engagement outside an
Speaker 2: event for young Jewish professionals. Professionals. There was the murder
Speaker 2: of the healthcare executive Brian Thompson, for which Luigi Mangione
Speaker 2: will be prosecuted by New York, Pennsylvania and the federal government.
Speaker 2: Prominent Democrats like AOC seem to think that stricter gun control,
Speaker 2: something Kurt would have vociferously opposed, will stop at all. No,
Speaker 2: the rot is deeper, and it's not just left on right.
Speaker 2: There's also that right wing crazy who shot and killed
Speaker 2: several Minnesota so to state legislators in June, for example.
Speaker 2: But there's also a disturbing strain that is emerging specifically
Speaker 2: on the left that makes light of political violence and
Speaker 2: seems to revel and bad things happening to the ideological enemies,
Speaker 2: like we're all play acting, like the deadly violence isn't
Speaker 2: real and concrete. And that's the thing. These kids who
Speaker 2: do this stuff, they really are detached from reality. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: it is just like a shooter game to them.
Speaker 4: They have spent their basically freshly into college. They've never
Speaker 4: once been outside their parents' home. They've never once suffered
Speaker 4: a consequence for their actions. Yeah, they have never experienced
Speaker 4: the real world, and as such, you know, they're not
Speaker 4: a part of the real world. None of this is
Speaker 4: actually real to them. They don't actually interface with it
Speaker 4: in any sort of real way.
Speaker 2: Yes, I agree, I'll just have one more comment before
Speaker 2: we go to our guests. Who's now ready. This is
Speaker 2: from Eric Ericson who said, I'm seeing people on the right,
Speaker 2: many of them professing Christians, say you just don't hate
Speaker 2: them enough. It seems to me that's what got us
Speaker 2: at this point, he said, And he said, many of
Speaker 2: them do hate us. Some of my right wing friends
Speaker 2: on here are not Christians, and half for a long
Speaker 2: time insisted that we need to embrace the methods of
Speaker 2: the left. Some of my Christian friends have agreed. But
Speaker 2: Christianity conquered the world by being the opposite of worldly hate.
Speaker 2: I don't think now is a good time to give
Speaker 2: that up. And again, this is not simply an issue
Speaker 2: that we want. Like from the perspective of Richard Dawkins,
Speaker 2: it's much more involved and important than just Christianity or
Speaker 2: Christen dumb or a Christian culture. He said, beat the
Speaker 2: left by seeking the welfare of the community in which
Speaker 2: you live, get married, have children, pray for your community.
Speaker 2: There you will find your welfare. And this is basically,
Speaker 2: in a sense a paraphrase of what God told the
Speaker 2: people who are in captivity in Babylon. He said, I
Speaker 2: know the plans I have for you, right plans to prosper,
Speaker 2: not to harm. And he gave them exactly that advice.
Speaker 2: He said, plant your crops, build your homes, build your families.
Speaker 2: And that's the way that we need to pursue this,
Speaker 2: not in this tit for tat, eye for an eye,
Speaker 2: tooth for tooth. Let's hate them more than they hate
Speaker 2: us type of approach. And at the same time, part
Speaker 2: of that is to prepare to make sure that we
Speaker 2: can protect our family and ourself from crazy things and
Speaker 2: crazy people. That's what we're going to be talking about
Speaker 2: when we come back with Acklass.
Speaker 4: Do you have a couple comments that one I'd like
Speaker 4: to read real fast? At least don't bro says Jack
Speaker 4: Ruby was interviewed by doctor Jolly West. Yes, he was.
Speaker 4: That's what I was referencing earlier, and I think that's
Speaker 4: what inspired the scene. You'll forget me for referencing Hollywood,
Speaker 4: But in Batman begins with a scarecrow shows up to
Speaker 4: interview the mob boss and drives him crazy with his
Speaker 4: you know, drugs. I'm pretty sure that's what they were
Speaker 4: referencing there.
Speaker 2: Maybe. Yeah, I don't remember the movie as well as
Speaker 2: I remember the JFK shooting.
Speaker 4: I remember the movie better. I wasn't there for the JFK.
Speaker 2: Yes, I stay. Miller one two three said, this feels
Speaker 2: the same as a JFK shooting and a lot of
Speaker 2: respects of that was another seminal moment, crossing yet another
Speaker 2: rubicon that was there. And so we're gonna take a
Speaker 2: quick break, folks, and we'll be right back with Jack
Speaker 2: Lawson and his Civil Defense Manual to stay with us.
Speaker 1: Mm hm, you're listening to the David Night Show and
Speaker 1: defending the American dream. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 4: Welcome back, folks. Joining us now is jacklaws And you
Speaker 4: can go to jacklosson books dot com to find these
Speaker 4: Civil Defense Manual volumes, so you can see them both here.
Speaker 4: They are both thick volumes, have got a lot of
Speaker 4: dense information and he's got passages from other experts as well,
Speaker 4: so you can find a lot of information about how
Speaker 4: to defend yourself in uncertain times, protect your community, find food,
Speaker 4: find water, make sure that you are not completely vulnerable
Speaker 4: in a scenario seems more and more likely every single day.
Speaker 2: So of course he also had he's got a substack
Speaker 2: where tell people where they can find these first alls.
Speaker 4: Jack Lawson, Jacklowson books dot com and.
Speaker 2: Jack, what is the what is your substack address? David?
Speaker 3: It's uh Jack losson books plural on the books dot
Speaker 3: substack dot com website.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and there's a link on the website to it
Speaker 2: as well.
Speaker 3: Instead of dot com, it's dot substack dot com. It's
Speaker 3: it's got We've got huge amounts. I've got one hundred
Speaker 3: some different articles on there. A lot of this is
Speaker 3: uh uh some of this out of my book. A
Speaker 3: lot of it is is very good free information. And uh,
Speaker 3: like I told one guy, I don't just do this
Speaker 3: because I want to try to make a buck here
Speaker 3: or there. I do this because of what we've been seeing.
Speaker 3: We were seeing a deterioration, the uh, deterioration of the
Speaker 3: fabric of American society. Yes, insanity going on, and people
Speaker 3: are not going to have a problem until there's a problem.
Speaker 3: Then they've got a problem. And if you're not prepared,
Speaker 3: you know, it's it's like Colonel Douglas McGregor says, it's
Speaker 3: going to be on top of people before they can
Speaker 3: do anything about it. So, yes, you need you need
Speaker 3: to get out there and get some get some basics done,
Speaker 3: protect you yourself, your wife, your partner, your family, whatever, friends. Anyway, yes,
Speaker 3: I agree.
Speaker 2: And two weeks ago you were saying there was going
Speaker 2: to be more shootings. Of course, and of course we had.
Speaker 2: The day that Charlie Kirk was shot, there was also
Speaker 2: another school shooting. Most people didn't hear about it because
Speaker 2: it was swamped out with all the news about Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 2: But it is a regular thing. What was your take
Speaker 2: on this on your substack article in general?
Speaker 3: Well, what I uh, what I believe is happening in
Speaker 3: a country is I always wondered why these mean South
Speaker 3: Africa con dictators went into the universities, arrested all the
Speaker 3: professors and closed the universities down. I see why they
Speaker 3: did it. Ever since, and if you look at this,
Speaker 3: they didn't do it prior to nineteen twenty. Ever since
Speaker 3: communism has come about, and especially in the thirties, the
Speaker 3: agitation and the education through universities and higher in institutions
Speaker 3: of higher learning have programmed people. I think all of
Speaker 3: these people are getting so wound up in all of
Speaker 3: the injustices that they imagine through their educational system, mostly
Speaker 3: that it's just corrupting their brain cells and causing them
Speaker 3: to want to become violent people.
Speaker 2: Well, they would do the radicalization just to the kids
Speaker 2: that were in college. But now they have taken it,
Speaker 2: you know, they've.
Speaker 3: It's in the school system.
Speaker 2: It's in the schools. They've taken it earlier and earlier
Speaker 2: and earlier into the school system. And that's what's really
Speaker 2: concerning about it. And they've taken it to a level.
Speaker 2: But you know, not even Marks and Lennon imagined with
Speaker 2: the training stuff, you know, in terms of getting these
Speaker 2: kids unstable.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I don't. I'm no, I don't have a crystal ball.
Speaker 3: I'm no clairvoyant. But if you connect the dots, you
Speaker 3: read enough and you think about things and connect the dots,
Speaker 3: it's right out there. Yeah, there are more of these
Speaker 3: shooters out there right now. They just haven't gotten around
Speaker 3: to it. Yeah, this is going to happen repeatedly. It
Speaker 3: amazes me the left is so anti gun, but it
Speaker 3: seems like all of the shootings, virtually all of them
Speaker 3: are coming from them.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: As much as they'd like to blame it on a
Speaker 3: white Christian conservative, I haven't been able to find one yet.
Speaker 2: So Yeah, Yeah, Well, there was one incident that happened,
Speaker 2: but up in Minneapolis, I think it was but uh,
Speaker 2: that where they attacked the legislators that were in state legislators.
Speaker 2: But for the most part, you.
Speaker 3: Know, it has been that guy was I don't believe
Speaker 3: that guy was a conservative. I believe he was hooked
Speaker 3: into some defense agencies as far as security. I from
Speaker 3: what I've read about him, I can't absolutely say that
Speaker 3: that he was a conservative. Walls the governor appointed him
Speaker 3: to a position through four years earlier, so you don't
Speaker 3: usually get appointed. I got appointed to a police board
Speaker 3: in Las Vegas, and.
Speaker 2: Uh, I think you're right about that.
Speaker 3: Yeah, No, it's there's there's politics come into play. People are.
Speaker 2: Because yeah, people are saying that because it was leftists
Speaker 2: that got shot up that were there. But yeah, I
Speaker 2: wouldn't be surprised if that was the case of well
Speaker 2: with this guy, because it is about mental derangement, and
Speaker 2: that is the real purpose of what they're doing in
Speaker 2: these schools is to get people disoriented. They want you disoriented,
Speaker 2: even about what body you're in. And I think that's
Speaker 2: the key thing that we need to understand. As much
Speaker 2: as they do. They understand that they got to mold
Speaker 2: the children from kindergarten on the earlier the better. We
Speaker 2: need to understand that as well, and we need to
Speaker 2: take that back. We need to take our children back
Speaker 2: from the state we were talking about.
Speaker 3: Is that going to get done? Is that going to
Speaker 3: get done under a conservative administration in four years?
Speaker 2: I think I think it'll get done when we do
Speaker 2: it ourselves. That's the key, you know, just like you're
Speaker 2: talking about with your own self defense, we need children
Speaker 2: defense manually. It is called homeschooling and take your kids
Speaker 2: out of these institutions. Fortunately, we have that ability in
Speaker 2: this country. Most countries don't, and I think that's one
Speaker 2: of the things, like the Second Amendment, that's unique about America,
Speaker 2: and we need to exercise those rights or we lose them.
Speaker 2: And I think that they the family needs to get
Speaker 2: their kids out of the school system. And if we
Speaker 2: did that enough, we might be able to get a
Speaker 2: consensus that we don't want to pay these confiscatory school
Speaker 2: taxes anymore. And that could be the end of the system.
Speaker 2: This building that is burning down and taking our society
Speaker 2: with it. And so that's that's what I would hope
Speaker 2: you had a very moving statement in your substack about
Speaker 2: the death of a child that that you came across
Speaker 2: when you were there fighting in Africa.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's uh. I've always felt sorry watches Goza thing.
Speaker 3: I not just that, it's everywhere. Yeah, when there's massive
Speaker 3: civil unrest or war, the kids always take the brunt
Speaker 3: of it, their innocence, and uh, I saw all ages
Speaker 3: of people. It was. It was mind bending. I was
Speaker 3: numb to I saw so much of it.
Speaker 2: But you talk about carrying a six month old baby
Speaker 2: in your arms to the helicopter.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah. They were moving bodies out of a out
Speaker 3: of an area, and most of these people had been
Speaker 3: killed by the communists. They were one tribe as much
Speaker 3: as they are both both tribes are supported by different
Speaker 3: elements of communism. Back then, you get two of them
Speaker 3: together and they'd fight to the death. And they got
Speaker 3: into a village and they killed two hundred and six
Speaker 3: people before we could stop them. We couldn't stop and
Speaker 3: they went into a frenzy. And I just never forget this,
Speaker 3: this little baby that I don't know, six months old.
Speaker 3: I just know one thing. It was something that has
Speaker 3: never left me. But people don't see that kind of
Speaker 3: thing here I saw it firsthand. Does it make you
Speaker 3: prone to thinking about violence more? Of course it does.
Speaker 3: I see these people doing what they're doing in this country.
Speaker 3: They have no idea of the Pandora's box, the can
Speaker 3: of worms they're opening. Once it's open, you can't get
Speaker 3: a clothed. It's very difficult. It takes a great amount
Speaker 3: of effort to restore civilization. And I look at us.
Speaker 3: I'm a student of the Spanish Civil War. There are
Speaker 3: things that are the opposite here, but I look at
Speaker 3: us as being about in nineteen thirty five. We're not
Speaker 3: far from open conflict. Is it going to be the
Speaker 3: army against leftist or leftists and the army against conservatives?
Speaker 3: I don't think so. I think what you're going to
Speaker 3: see is increasing violence between groups of people. Goes I
Speaker 3: don't know. I hope it doesn't go to what I
Speaker 3: lived in there, and that was the car bomb. You
Speaker 3: never knew walking down the street, whether somebody's going to
Speaker 3: set a bomb off in a car and innocence kt killed.
Speaker 2: That's right, Yeah, it's h And when you look at
Speaker 2: the twentieth century, the massive tens of millions of people
Speaker 2: killed in various conflicts, always a communist, you know stalin Mao,
Speaker 2: the situation in Zimbabwe. Of course you also have in
Speaker 2: Cambodia and things like that. It's always this leftist mindset
Speaker 2: that is godless, that is tatalitarian. That's where this all
Speaker 2: flows from. And I interviewed she Van Fleet a while ago,
Speaker 2: and she wrote a book called Mao's America, and she
Speaker 2: said all of this anti racism and stuff, and the
Speaker 2: tactics that they're using against kids, she said that was
Speaker 2: essentially drawn directly from Mao's struggle sessions where you had
Speaker 2: to denounce your parents and denounce this and anounced that.
Speaker 2: And she said people don't realize that that was the
Speaker 2: foundation of what was being done by mal and they
Speaker 2: think that this is something different, something that's new, but
Speaker 2: it is tied back to that and it will lead
Speaker 2: to the same type of.
Speaker 3: Thing, same same thing. Yeah. Side note for the worshippers
Speaker 3: of Moussee Tongue and chagu Obara, Yeah, both of those
Speaker 3: guys took pride in their body Odor. Don't ask me
Speaker 3: where they got to one of the guys in my
Speaker 3: Special Forces chapter trained to Bolivians and hunting him down,
Speaker 3: which they did. Che Guvara and Apparently he was so
Speaker 3: filthy when he was after the revolution. He was working
Speaker 3: in the cane fields and he had relations with a
Speaker 3: woman there and he smelled so bad she threw up,
Speaker 3: you know, I mean, it was it was it. These
Speaker 3: people are are legends in their own mind. Yeah, they're
Speaker 3: fabricated legends. And the bottom line is, you know, they
Speaker 3: got a lot of blood in their hands, but they're
Speaker 3: boundy determined to try it again because we didn't get
Speaker 3: it right the last time. What is that I didn't
Speaker 3: kill enough people. I don't know what goes through the mind.
Speaker 3: You know. My neighbors in Las Vegas were escapees from
Speaker 3: Eastern Bloc countries, and I had a interesting two hours.
Speaker 3: I went to a birthday party. I used to drink
Speaker 3: back and they're big drinkers, and I at a lull.
Speaker 3: I asked them what was communism like? What was like
Speaker 3: living in communism? They sat there, they were dumbfounded. I
Speaker 3: asked that question. They looked at each other, started chatting
Speaker 3: in their foreign language, laughing a little bit, and then
Speaker 3: they unloaded on me. And one of the things that
Speaker 3: you have to understand is they said communism destroys hope
Speaker 3: and the spirit of man, it's naturally it's naturally antagonistic
Speaker 3: to human nature.
Speaker 2: Yes, and antagonistic to God. And uh, I'll have to
Speaker 2: remember that story about Chagua Vara. When I see some
Speaker 2: lufty wearing a Chego war shirt, I probably won't say
Speaker 2: anything to them about it, because they're probably deranged enough
Speaker 2: they attack me.
Speaker 4: But I've got a comment here from Lanta says that
Speaker 4: seems to be a common problem for all communists.
Speaker 2: That's right. Yeah, they are anti God. And I guess
Speaker 2: maybe that's maybe that's where the thing cleanliness is next
Speaker 2: to godlesness and so godless communists and I clean either.
Speaker 4: Goes hand in hand.
Speaker 3: I think they're anti anti soap far Anyway, it's it's
Speaker 3: a horrible thing. Let me let me tell your listeners
Speaker 3: a little bit about my touth. I was in the
Speaker 3: American Air Force. I was I was in an electronics I
Speaker 3: dealt with army and disarming the sorry W forty thermonuclear warhead.
Speaker 3: After that, I got out. I ended up in Africa
Speaker 3: in the Foreign Legion in an anti terrorist rapid response unit.
Speaker 3: We were taken in by helicopters. There also paras who trained,
Speaker 3: so I saw differences in the military that were drastic.
Speaker 3: And then, by the way, I call Africa the continent
Speaker 3: of the apocalypse now and the land of blood in tears,
Speaker 3: because that's all I saw over there was blood in tears,
Speaker 3: a wonderful, wonderful people. The black people over there, Unfortunately,
Speaker 3: their tribal they're a little more prone to become communists
Speaker 3: and to take the hard walk on the road of democracy.
Speaker 3: It's difficult for them to understand because of the elder
Speaker 3: system they have.
Speaker 2: After I takes a village type of mindset that Hillary
Speaker 2: loves so much.
Speaker 3: Right, oh yeah, well, I'll tell you what. That doesn't
Speaker 3: quite work the way the way that that statement is.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 3: Then I was on a police board in a major city,
Speaker 3: one of the biggest police boards. So I've got a
Speaker 3: lot of understanding of what goes on our society. If
Speaker 3: you want to see the underbelious city, go do a
Speaker 3: ride along with the police department. You won't come out
Speaker 3: of there thinking the same way about your city again. Anyway,
Speaker 3: I have to look at life as with the experiences
Speaker 3: I've had, I know how this is not normal reality
Speaker 3: we live in. Our normal reality is barbarism and war. Yes,
Speaker 3: and that's not me saying that that's C. S. Lewis,
Speaker 3: the famous Christian philosopher. I do believe we've moved away
Speaker 3: from God and Jesus and good compassion and forgiveness. And
Speaker 3: it's just showing more and more in the radical approach
Speaker 3: people are taking, not discussing anything they don't want to.
Speaker 3: You're a Nazi racist if you don't agree with them, yes,
Speaker 3: and you know you were just talking about this earlier
Speaker 3: on your show, but it's very true. They want to
Speaker 3: silence you by calling you a Nazi, and I in
Speaker 3: turn call them lunatics because that's what they are.
Speaker 2: Yes. And of course, you know when they wanted to
Speaker 2: move us away from God and where they wanted to
Speaker 2: shut down the free exercise religion, where did they start
Speaker 2: the schools? You know, that's where they started purging at first,
Speaker 2: and then it metastasized that from that, because everything always
Speaker 2: starts with the schools. You know, we understand that the
Speaker 2: children are the future, but we don't act like it.
Speaker 2: They do act like it, and so that's really the key.
Speaker 2: And you know the first time I talked to you, Jack,
Speaker 2: we talked about how fragile the supply lines are in
Speaker 2: America and that was even before the lockdowns of twenty twenty.
Speaker 2: Then we saw that demonstrate to us just how fragile
Speaker 2: supply lines are. When we had the imposition of the
Speaker 2: lockdown rules, you wound up with empty shelves. But then
Speaker 2: on the farms, they were destroying massive quantities of food
Speaker 2: because they couldn't get it to market. And so we
Speaker 2: have a.
Speaker 3: They couldn't get a process mostly because the factories, the
Speaker 3: workforces were shut.
Speaker 2: Out, that's right.
Speaker 3: So that was a large part, that's right.
Speaker 2: So you know, we have a very very fragile system,
Speaker 2: and you talked about that the just in time delivery,
Speaker 2: and it tends to cascade. So we are, as many
Speaker 2: people have said, we're like nine meals away from anarchy.
Speaker 2: That's why your book is so important. Being able to
Speaker 2: help yourself and also to help your neighbors, and to
Speaker 2: start to build connections with those neighbors and a community
Speaker 2: of people who can stand with each other. That I
Speaker 2: think those are the essence I see of the Soul
Speaker 2: Defense Manual. Of course, you've had a lot of expertise
Speaker 2: in practice in that yourself personally, but you also have
Speaker 2: a lot of experts in various other parts of various
Speaker 2: other aspects that also have contributed to your book as well, David.
Speaker 3: Most most people have got my background. I want to
Speaker 3: go into teaching people how to combat shoot. I've done this.
Speaker 3: I was an instructor at a public range for seven years.
Speaker 3: I don't get into the tactics so much. I don't
Speaker 3: get in. My prime directive is not tactics. It's not
Speaker 3: how to shoot a gun. My prime directive. And people
Speaker 3: need to understand this. Without this, you're not going to survive.
Speaker 3: And that is the store food and the store water. Yes,
Speaker 3: those are the critical issues, just like you say supply chain,
Speaker 3: and I go into this in depth. I have a calculator.
Speaker 3: It's free for people to use. Go into my substock
Speaker 3: account and you can find a food and water calculator
Speaker 3: that will tell anybody if they get what they've got
Speaker 3: stored for canned food or ram in, any of those
Speaker 3: things and calculated, I'll tell you how many days of
Speaker 3: food you've got. Water. Water has also become as fragile
Speaker 3: or more so than the food system.
Speaker 2: And you have a free chapter about water at your
Speaker 2: website as well. Jackwoss of books dot Com.
Speaker 3: How to you need a renewable water source? How to
Speaker 3: treat it anyway. All that stuff's free in there if
Speaker 3: people want.
Speaker 2: To go in and look at it, and I'm suggested
Speaker 2: they do, because you need to know that about the water.
Speaker 2: And if you see Jack's chapter on water, you'll just
Speaker 2: how wise and thorough these books are on other topics,
Speaker 2: but that is a seminal one. That's the one that
Speaker 2: you can't live without for a very short period of time.
Speaker 2: And so he put that out there for free. It
Speaker 2: really kind of tells you something about his heart.
Speaker 3: And especially last time I was on Travis and I
Speaker 3: were talking about the food and water thing. He brought
Speaker 3: up this very thing. Three days, four days maybe without
Speaker 3: any water, and three weeks without food, And that's that's
Speaker 3: when you start. That's when you better be saying your
Speaker 3: prayers because you aren't gonna last too much longer.
Speaker 4: And especially in a scenario where you know you don't
Speaker 4: maybe the powers down, you don't have air conditioning, where
Speaker 4: all these other things are happening, and you're having to
Speaker 4: exert yourself physically, the amount of water you need to
Speaker 4: consume goes up. We're not just talking about your typical
Speaker 4: average day where maybe you know you stay inside, you're
Speaker 4: in your air conditioned house, and you don't need that
Speaker 4: much water to stay active, stay hydrated. This is going
Speaker 4: to be where.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you're thinking, you're thinking three dimensionally like people have
Speaker 3: to think. What you say is so true. It's you
Speaker 3: might consume or need a fourth as much water as
Speaker 3: you do when the air conditioner. I've got a friend,
Speaker 3: former Navy seelofs, a great author, Matt Bracken, and he
Speaker 3: told me, he said, Jack, wait till the air conditioning
Speaker 3: goes out in cars in Florida. You're going to see
Speaker 3: a lot of road rage, you know. And it's true.
Speaker 3: People are so acclimatized to an environment that's comfortable. I
Speaker 3: want to starts going the other way. But what you say, Travis,
Speaker 3: is very true. That will put a factor to this,
Speaker 3: to the problem that multiplies it exponentially.
Speaker 2: Yes, I grew up in Florida, so I know what
Speaker 2: it's like to travel on the car with that air conditioning.
Speaker 2: Summer I went to schools of that air conditioning, and
Speaker 2: of course the cars had mellow all through the interior
Speaker 2: as well. They got really hot. But now I've been spoiled.
Speaker 2: It's just we get soft, you know.
Speaker 3: And the guy guys from Florida is telling me about
Speaker 3: the convertible they drive around in drinking beer and having
Speaker 3: a hurricane party, drive it up the rod with the
Speaker 3: top down, and it's so funny to listen to them.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, he was the issue I've got.
Speaker 3: I've got the eight to Z in this book, just
Speaker 3: about anything that people have to look at. Uh, literally
Speaker 3: being in an off grid situation without power, without heat. There,
Speaker 3: it's the simple things in here. The Russians will teach
Speaker 3: you this. Dig down into the ground. The root cellar
Speaker 3: is the thing of the past generally as people. But
Speaker 3: when you get down three four feet in the ground,
Speaker 3: and you can be twenty below zero as long as
Speaker 3: you cover the top, but you've got a fifty five
Speaker 3: degree temperature coming out of the earth that's pretty much consistent.
Speaker 3: If you keep that temperature, you keep that heat from
Speaker 3: going out. That's one where I've got all this stuff
Speaker 3: in the book. But the bottom line is this, I
Speaker 3: get into the major two issues, food and water. That's
Speaker 3: what's going to cause problem. There's a saying that revolutions
Speaker 3: starts on hungry's stomach. Well that may be true, but
Speaker 3: chaos starts from thirsty people. Yeah, might say.
Speaker 2: That's really key. Yes, well, you know, we're we've we're
Speaker 2: looking at a very dangerous time in history. This is
Speaker 2: a cycle. I believe that there is a cycle of
Speaker 2: about eighty years where institutions are taken down as major
Speaker 2: economic changes, was laid out by Strausser. Now, yeah, fourth
Speaker 2: Turning exactly, and it does seem to be lining up
Speaker 2: that way, and we're getting very close to the end
Speaker 2: of the fourth Turning as they expected it and predicted it.
Speaker 2: They said about twenty twenty nine, So we're getting there.
Speaker 2: And it seems like all of the people making their
Speaker 2: plans for the new Dystopian technocracy also agreed with that
Speaker 2: time frame, because they all look to twenty thirty is
Speaker 2: the year they want to have this stuff out there.
Speaker 2: So there's going to be an acceleration of change in
Speaker 2: these next few years, and certainly you see it. You
Speaker 2: mentioned Colonel Douglas McGregor, and I guess he was talking
Speaker 2: about the various wars that they're trying to drag us into.
Speaker 2: We've had this, they're continuing to try to escalate things
Speaker 2: with Ukraine, and as you look at France and the
Speaker 2: collapses that are happening there, they're having fires all over
Speaker 2: the place in terms of protest, and he's on I
Speaker 2: think the fifth president that they've had there or prime minister.
Speaker 2: I forget which one. I guess Macron has one title
Speaker 2: and the other guy's got another one. But they just
Speaker 2: had the government fall yet again. And so I think
Speaker 2: that's one of the reasons why you've got France and
Speaker 2: other places pushing so hard for war. As Gerald Centi
Speaker 2: always says, when everything fails, they tried to take you
Speaker 2: to war.
Speaker 3: One hundred percent, right, It's always that's been the end
Speaker 3: of economic chaos, start a war and kind of cover
Speaker 3: the books up. You know. I've got a friend, an
Speaker 3: American friend that lives in France, and I get the
Speaker 3: low down and what goes on the farms over there.
Speaker 3: Quite an interesting character. He's been just visited me over here,
Speaker 3: but interesting to hear their opinion of issues American and whatnot.
Speaker 3: But anyway, rick Is fills me in from an American
Speaker 3: standpoint of what's going on. I'll say this, you know,
Speaker 3: you talk about the wars going on. It reminds me
Speaker 3: of the black and white movie The Bomber's Flying in
Speaker 3: nineteen eighty four. It reminds me that they're setting things
Speaker 3: up Eurasia. It's almost like or Will wrote a book
Speaker 3: and giving you the blooprint. And what they're going to do.
Speaker 3: It's quite amazing, I believe. Also don't want to sound
Speaker 3: like a Bible thumper. I want to push something first.
Speaker 3: I've got a little book that I think people can
Speaker 3: get it for nothing, and it's called uh, it's called
Speaker 3: plus Nothing p l us Nothing. It's an introduction to
Speaker 3: Jesus Christ. And I go to head friend look at
Speaker 3: my car window and he sees, uh, he sees a
Speaker 3: Bible there and he says, Assome, what's going on? Ah?
Speaker 3: I said, that's for my Bible steady group. I said,
Speaker 3: I actually go to two of them. He said, what
Speaker 3: two Bible groups? Jack? What's happening? And I told him
Speaker 3: maybe you ought to start looking into you know, he's talking.
Speaker 3: He's very fatalistic sounding. But the bottom line is this
Speaker 3: plus nothing book I carried around. Mayo's got his little
Speaker 3: red book. That's a little brown book I've called my
Speaker 3: little brook. You know. But I do think we're coming
Speaker 3: to a fourth turning end of times. There's just too
Speaker 3: many issues. Is that Jack Lawson getting ages? Is that
Speaker 3: Jack Lawson getting afraid of No, I'm not I want
Speaker 3: I would be missing my family and when I go on,
Speaker 3: but I'm kind of curious about what's down the road,
Speaker 3: and you know it's it's it's something religion as far
Speaker 3: as Christianity goes. I've had my son who was Muslim
Speaker 3: and he describes that he's no longer, but he describes
Speaker 3: that religion. And I have a Jewish friend and my
Speaker 3: wife's Dewey not she baptized Christian, but describe what they
Speaker 3: think of their religion. And the one thing I believe
Speaker 3: this missing is the compassion and forgiveness they you know,
Speaker 3: outside of having those two and believing in those two things,
Speaker 3: I think you end up having a manual, not a
Speaker 3: guide book.
Speaker 2: And that's what people want, you know, people want a
Speaker 2: list of things to do that can earn their salvation.
Speaker 2: But when they fall short, I mean, even if you
Speaker 2: make a dumbed down list, because we all know that
Speaker 2: we all make our to do list and then we
Speaker 2: all fail. Even with a to do list on a
Speaker 2: regular basis, you always fail to fulfill up perfectly. And
Speaker 2: so what do they do when they fail? You know?
Speaker 2: For us, for Christians, we know that it is Christ
Speaker 2: plus Nothing, I think is probably where that book is going.
Speaker 2: It's what Christ has done for us plus nothing that
Speaker 2: we do is really going to merit this. And so
Speaker 2: it is that forgiveness that is there, that ability to
Speaker 2: be able to know that you have that relationship and
Speaker 2: then to know that with that relationship you can fail
Speaker 2: and start again, fail and start again an infinite number
Speaker 2: of times. But there has to be that basis there
Speaker 2: as to what do you do with your failures? And
Speaker 2: that's Jesus Christ, isn't it?
Speaker 3: Yes? This plus nothing dot Com great resource. The first page,
Speaker 3: the words were so profound. I've read a lot of stuff.
Speaker 3: I've read books on Hindu I've got a book on Judaism.
Speaker 3: I've got the Torah and part of the Taal Mood
Speaker 3: I don't buy into too much. I've got a Quran
Speaker 3: I'm trying to read. It's an interpretation English's very difficult
Speaker 3: to read. But I've probably read half of it. And
Speaker 3: I looked through this stuff, and then I look through
Speaker 3: the Bible, which I'm no scholar by, and I read things.
Speaker 3: But the first page is this plus nothing dot Com book.
Speaker 3: I have memorized it. The words were so profound and
Speaker 3: It means so much to me that actually memorize it,
Speaker 3: and that's hard for me to do.
Speaker 2: Well, what's the summary of what it says the first page? There,
Speaker 2: you got it memorized, yes, Second, well, summarize it then,
Speaker 2: since you've got to come up.
Speaker 3: And it's basically stating the beginning of the world. It says,
Speaker 3: in the beginning, before earth was made, the Word was there, Yes, yes,
Speaker 3: the Word was with God. The Word was God. Then
Speaker 3: it says he was there with God in the beginning.
Speaker 3: Everything was made through him and nothing was made without him.
Speaker 2: Beginning of light, yes, pardon the beginning of John Yes, yes.
Speaker 3: Yeah, beginning of time. Basically, in him there was life,
Speaker 3: and that life was a light for people of the world.
Speaker 3: The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has
Speaker 3: not defeated it. That to me is basically you can
Speaker 3: fit it any religion you want, But if you believe
Speaker 3: in God and you believe in our case and Jesus,
Speaker 3: that means a lot to me. I think people have
Speaker 3: moved away from this. I try to bring this up
Speaker 3: to some of my kids. And when you mentioned Jesus,
Speaker 3: it's like you might as well have done something evil
Speaker 3: in your lifetime they find out about it's like it
Speaker 3: turns people off. And I don't think people should look
Speaker 3: at that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and why is that? What do you think? I mean?
Speaker 2: I had a friend who grew up in Japan. They
Speaker 2: said they don't swear using Buddha's name. They swear using
Speaker 2: Jesus's name. And they're not Christians. They don't know anything
Speaker 2: about Jesus. Isn't that a time?
Speaker 3: I think, David, I think people. I think people watch
Speaker 3: so much TV and on this entertainment industry. I think
Speaker 3: for the last fifty or sixty years as demon I religion,
Speaker 3: I've noticed I'll see something about some uh you know,
Speaker 3: for all, I know some priests it's a killer or
Speaker 3: goofy things that may have happened, but there's such a
Speaker 3: small minutia of what really happens. I see, you know,
Speaker 3: you see the who was the Tammy Ray uh, the
Speaker 3: movie about the evangelist that was.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, they can't remember his name, Tammy Fay or whatever.
Speaker 2: Baker Baker, that was his name, Jim Baker, Yeah, the prototypelist.
Speaker 3: You see his wife And and I think people look
Speaker 3: at all religious movements as that. I've always had a
Speaker 3: saying religion is the greatest thing to mankind untill they
Speaker 3: brought people into it. You know it is.
Speaker 2: Those TV angels really poisoned the well for a lot
Speaker 2: of people.
Speaker 3: Absolutely did.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but people, people need to do one thing. If
Speaker 3: they do anything and walk away from listening to this,
Speaker 3: start storing some food and water. If people don't think
Speaker 3: tough times are coming, believe me, they'll be just like
Speaker 3: Colonel McGregor says, they'll be on you before you know it.
Speaker 3: And I think that's a critical issue. I try to
Speaker 3: get this across to people. I've convinced some to start.
Speaker 3: The funny thing is, once they start thinking about it,
Speaker 3: they start accelerating in their effort to store food and water.
Speaker 2: Yes, when you were saying that, what was he talking about.
Speaker 2: Was he talking about just a natural societal breakdown or
Speaker 2: was Colonel McGregor talking about that in the context.
Speaker 3: No, he's talking about. What he's talking about an exacerbation
Speaker 3: and increase in the amount of conflict between polarized forces
Speaker 3: in this country. And the other thing is is the
Speaker 3: threat of nuclear war. Yes, I've also people want to
Speaker 3: go on there, I've got I went to nuclear warfare training.
Speaker 3: I am no expert. I have no more than the
Speaker 3: average bear knows about it. I'm not going to tell
Speaker 3: you how to arm or disarm a nuclear bomb, but
Speaker 3: at the bottom line is I never set one off,
Speaker 3: so I guess it's fairly good at what I did,
Speaker 3: and I did. I did this for I did this
Speaker 3: for fourteen months. I actually got it radiated. I believe
Speaker 3: I used to set right on the bomb case while
Speaker 3: I was doing this some picking style, right, yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 3: I didn't have a cowboy hat. But anyway, it and
Speaker 3: it didn't you know, it wasn't on an aircraft. It
Speaker 3: was in a silo. But the I have in there
Speaker 3: the basics of how you can survive. It's very if
Speaker 3: once you're in a blast area, nuclear warfare is very survivable.
Speaker 3: I've told people this and they laugh because I say
Speaker 3: the new nuclear weapons. I work in the old dirty
Speaker 3: bombs they were the first ones. They come out with
Speaker 3: thermonucletive in nineteen fifty nine. But the new bombs are
Speaker 3: environmentally friendly. That's what they call they're green bombs. They're
Speaker 3: actually designed the material after the explosion are designed to
Speaker 3: decay at an accelerated rate.
Speaker 2: Well, and then you have the kinetic weapons like the
Speaker 2: hypersonic missiles that because of the kinetic energy there, they
Speaker 2: don't need to have as big an explosive warhead there,
Speaker 2: the damage that they can do, and how indefensible our
Speaker 2: Western systems are against that both Russian and China have
Speaker 2: the hypersonic weapons. It is I think just hatred and
Speaker 2: contempt of their people for the leaders in NATO be
Speaker 2: doing what they're doing.
Speaker 3: Unbelievable. Yeah, it's unbelievable. How they've subjugated France. Germany is
Speaker 3: basically France England. I mean there's the Prime Minister of
Speaker 3: England standing up and people complaining about massive immigration, knifings, groomings,
Speaker 3: raping women, and he says, it doesn't matter what you think. Yeah,
Speaker 3: well where we'll see where they go. But I don't.
Speaker 3: I think it's far from down there. And a lot
Speaker 3: of English people they are bulldogs. That's used to be
Speaker 3: their symbol, the bulldog. They are bulldogs and some of
Speaker 3: the toughest people I've ever run into. I mean, they
Speaker 3: just don't quit.
Speaker 2: But their leaders have absolute contempt for them. And I think,
Speaker 2: you know, when we look at the issue of World
Speaker 2: War three, I think that the leaders of France, Germany
Speaker 2: and the UK would like nothing better than to have
Speaker 2: a massive attack, to have massive casualties against their own people,
Speaker 2: because their own are their enemies.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I don't think. My belief is I don't think
Speaker 3: you'll see tactical nuclear weapons. That is another Pandora's box.
Speaker 3: Once it's opened. I've got a saying there is no
Speaker 3: such thing as a tactical nuclear weapon. Low yield weapons
Speaker 3: like that. You can use a thermobaric bomb. I'm one
Speaker 3: of the few people alive that witnessed the explosion of
Speaker 3: a thermal of a thermobaric bomb, which is a fuel
Speaker 3: air bomb. It's a close cousin to a nuclear bomb
Speaker 3: from the effects, and I saw that firsthand. That's probably
Speaker 3: something they'll use rather than But it puts a mushroom
Speaker 3: cloud out and I'll tell you what, I was eight
Speaker 3: hundred maybe six hundred yards from it, and I'll never
Speaker 3: ever forget it. So you know we're in We've got
Speaker 3: a lot of dangerous things going on. But the bottom line,
Speaker 3: if you want to know how to survive nuclear fall out,
Speaker 3: whatever there will be, I've got a whole chapter on
Speaker 3: it in the book. It's it's on my website. I
Speaker 3: put that out there because I want people to know.
Speaker 3: And it's part of an article written by Physicians for
Speaker 3: Self Defense and Shane O'Connor out of KI for you,
Speaker 3: and it'll tell you what to do to prepare. Bottom
Speaker 3: line is a couple days, three days in the center
Speaker 3: of your house, keeping the air circulation from happening, and
Speaker 3: you can walk out the door and it'll be low
Speaker 3: enough Renkins, which is the measurement of radiation that you
Speaker 3: can survive it. This is not like Chernobyl. Chernobyl was
Speaker 3: a leak of radioactive material continuing to emit and put
Speaker 3: gamma rays out. This is an explosion and explosion things
Speaker 3: burn up, are decay, and there's a big difference between these.
Speaker 3: But bottom line is that's there. There's a lot of things.
Speaker 2: In the greater The greater threat, which is what you
Speaker 2: address in your book, is the complete destruction of infrastructure.
Speaker 2: Right there's no power, there's no food coming in, and
Speaker 2: you've got roving gangs of people. That's the bigger threat
Speaker 2: that is more likely to happen. And actually, you know,
Speaker 2: if we have I'm talking about this earlier Heritage Foundation
Speaker 2: was wargaming. So what if we have a conflict with
Speaker 2: China over Taiwan. What might Chin to do? They point out,
Speaker 2: they might do a lot of things that could not
Speaker 2: even be directly traced to them. There'll be a tax
Speaker 2: on our infrastructure, on our water supply, our electricity, many
Speaker 2: other things like that. And just look at how chaotic
Speaker 2: that would be in this country. You want to ask,
Speaker 2: I've got another Jack question.
Speaker 4: I'm looking at the table of contents in the Civil
Speaker 4: Defense Manual, Volume one, and I see chapter six. You know,
Speaker 4: the reality of a catastrophic event. In chapter seven, the
Speaker 4: mental state needed to cope with a catastrophic event. And
Speaker 4: I think that's something that I'd like to hear more about,
Speaker 4: because again, we in America live a very very shell
Speaker 4: their soft life.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 4: We see these things from a distance online, and I
Speaker 4: think that can fool some of us into thinking, well,
Speaker 4: we've witnessed this, we could handle it. But the reality
Speaker 4: is always going to be so incredibly different, and it's
Speaker 4: going to be something unlike anything we've ever experienced. I'm
Speaker 4: just wondering if you could tell people a little bit
Speaker 4: of what you think they would need in terms of
Speaker 4: mentality and mental to deal with what would happen.
Speaker 3: Number one, I've got to get their nose out of
Speaker 3: their iPhone. I'm not a regression. I'm not what do
Speaker 3: they call it in communism, not a reactionary. But the
Speaker 3: bottom line is I got rid of my iPhone and
Speaker 3: got a flip phone. Why it was too interrupted, my
Speaker 3: focus on everything too much. Yes, you get your nose
Speaker 3: out of your phone and start looking people in the
Speaker 3: eye when you're talking to them. Uh. The mentality to
Speaker 3: survive is a four sided box. It's it's got your
Speaker 3: survival mentality, it's got your training, it's got your equipment
Speaker 3: that you have. And the bottom line is, if any
Speaker 3: of those two sides fall in you, you don't have a
Speaker 3: survival mentality. You have got to want to survive for yourself,
Speaker 3: but as much as for yourself, more so for your
Speaker 3: your family and friends and people. Read all kinds I've
Speaker 3: I've been in situations. I probably shouldn't be walking around
Speaker 3: the planet anymore, by God's good grace. And that's all
Speaker 3: I can figure. By all the things I went through,
Speaker 3: I managed to get out of situations, but it was
Speaker 3: also dogged determination. I don't know. Maybe maybe I got
Speaker 3: toilet trained too early. I don't know what caused this,
Speaker 3: but either that or I did too much butt hard
Speaker 3: work on a farm, but I just didn't let go
Speaker 3: until I got out of something. And there were times
Speaker 3: where I almost gave up. But the survival mentality, you
Speaker 3: got to want to survive. If you read the very
Speaker 3: first story in the book, you'll get into a part
Speaker 3: that says about a society less than thirty five years
Speaker 3: ago that absolutely went totally to hell and people ended
Speaker 3: up living like animals. And you'll tell or in there.
Speaker 3: The guy that wrote the story let me print it.
Speaker 3: A guy be named a Selko Selco. He's one of
Speaker 3: the most well known people in the survival in Preparedness.
Speaker 3: He said that a lot of people just died initially
Speaker 3: in the first couple of months. They lost the will
Speaker 3: to live because their society was they had disintegrated. No water,
Speaker 3: they didn't want to put up with us, they'd rather die.
Speaker 3: There will be a lot of people that'll that'll die
Speaker 3: that way. I've had theories put to me that people
Speaker 3: with guns are going to run go around and take
Speaker 3: food and they're going to be killed off. No, I
Speaker 3: don't think so. I think the majority of them gangs,
Speaker 3: and they'll be not just criminal gangs, there'll be gangs
Speaker 3: of people that gather together for strength to survive. This
Speaker 3: is why I push a neighborhood protection plan, getting to
Speaker 3: know your neighbors and working together with your neighbors. But
Speaker 3: if you don't have the survival mentality, you don't buy
Speaker 3: the book. If you can't get that, you're not going
Speaker 3: to survive. That's the long choice. The other thing is
Speaker 3: as long as the survival mentality, again is the preparedness,
Speaker 3: the food and water, big big thing. Fire Arms come
Speaker 3: with it because it's the most efficient way to defend yourself.
Speaker 3: So yeah, yeah, answer your question.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and we go back and look at it. I
Speaker 2: always think about the term outlaw, and of course that
Speaker 2: was somebody who had done something that was outside of
Speaker 2: the law of the community. So they were ejected and
Speaker 2: that was a big deal because now you are outside
Speaker 2: of the protection of that community. I think that that's
Speaker 2: what we're looking at, you know, going back to that,
Speaker 2: it's a community of self protection that is there. And
Speaker 2: you know, we don't really think government has not really
Speaker 2: been about protecting us. I'm talking about that earlier in
Speaker 2: the show. It's about protecting their agenda and themselves, and
Speaker 2: so we don't really think about that. But if you
Speaker 2: create a community and you've got some great tips and
Speaker 2: pointers on how to do that, the dues and the
Speaker 2: don'ts of doing that, and considerations from somebody who's done it,
Speaker 2: and if you don't have a community there that you've
Speaker 2: put together, you're not going to be able to survive
Speaker 2: on your own. Very important.
Speaker 3: I'd like to end with this. This is doesn't come
Speaker 3: for me. Comes from a trauma management person, very knowledgeable.
Speaker 3: I've read quite a bit of the information that put out.
Speaker 3: This is why people become victims. Now, of any audience
Speaker 3: out there feels any one of these fits them, then
Speaker 3: they've got to start changing course. And number one, it
Speaker 3: won't happen. Number two, it's going to happen, but not
Speaker 3: to me. Number three it's going to happen to me,
Speaker 3: but it won't be that bad. And the number four
Speaker 3: it happened to me, but there was nothing I could
Speaker 3: have done about it. Anyway, that's probably the last thought
Speaker 3: going through people's minds when the lights go out.
Speaker 2: So yeah, anyway, that's a great summary. It really is. Yeah.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, you know, along those same lines,
Speaker 2: when I talk about how they're gonna take away all
Speaker 2: private cars from everybody. I remember going to an automotive
Speaker 2: show in Austin and reporting on it, and I talked
Speaker 2: to people that there were the classic cars and you know,
Speaker 2: these real gear heads modifying their cars and how much
Speaker 2: they loved it and everything. And I talked to them
Speaker 2: and almost to a man, they all said, do you
Speaker 2: know they're going to outwalk cars? But it's not going
Speaker 2: to happen in my lifetime. And it was even the
Speaker 2: young kids were saying that kind of thing. It's a
Speaker 2: kind of a denial that we tell ourselves, so we
Speaker 2: have to prepare for that. You know, these people were
Speaker 2: uniquely prepared to be able to keep their cars going.
Speaker 2: But still, you know when we look at this, that
Speaker 2: is the key thing.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I don't live this doom a gloom thing. I mean,
Speaker 3: somebody told me, you know, you're not enjoying your return
Speaker 3: and I said, no, I'm living like I normally live.
Speaker 3: I write books though about this, and I said, what
Speaker 3: am I supposed to do? Dye my hair black? My
Speaker 3: nineteen sixties muscle car a convertible, drive around and pummed,
Speaker 3: you know to the Beach Boys songs, and.
Speaker 2: You got the stereotype as a matter of fact, that's
Speaker 2: happening here in Gatlinburg and Pigeonforde this weekend.
Speaker 4: And I see what exact guy you're describing all over
Speaker 4: the place.
Speaker 2: Tens of thousands of the.
Speaker 3: Twenty five years old. Again, that's not me. I love
Speaker 3: my grandkids, kids, very lucky. God's given me some grace
Speaker 3: when it comes to them. I've got great kids and
Speaker 3: great jobs.
Speaker 2: Yes, thank you so much. It is such an excellent
Speaker 2: resource and I can't recommend it highly enough. Jacklowsonbooks dot
Speaker 2: com Civil Defense Manual.
Speaker 4: Yes, go to jacklosson books dot com look at the
Speaker 4: Civil Defense Manual and check out what he's put up
Speaker 4: there for free already. Thank you so much, Jack.
Speaker 2: Thank you, Jack, have a good day, Thank you, and
Speaker 2: talk to you. Have a good weekend all of you.
Speaker 2: Hopefully we'll see you on Monday. Have a good weekend.
Speaker 3: Take care.
Speaker 2: The common man. They created common Core, They've dumbed down
Speaker 2: our children. They created common Pass to track and control us,
Speaker 2: their Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
Speaker 2: and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
Speaker 2: unsophisticated ordinary, but each of us has worth and dignity.
Speaker 2: Created in the image of God. That is what we
Speaker 2: have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Speaker 2: Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
Speaker 2: to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
Speaker 2: It's time to turn that around and expose what they
Speaker 2: want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
Speaker 2: find at the Davidknightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Speaker 2: Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
Speaker 2: please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com