Speaker 1: You're a world of deceit. Telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As the clock strikes thirteen, it is Tuesday, the twentieth
Speaker 2: of May, year of Our Lord twenty five, and we're
Speaker 2: gonna look at Cash Betel and Dan Bongino waffling on
Speaker 2: the January the sixth story, the LGBT insanity, and then
Speaker 2: some news regarding Israel's continued destruction of Gaza.
Speaker 3: Stay with us.
Speaker 2: Well, good morning, folks, and thank you for joining us.
Speaker 2: I hope you're having a wonderful morning so far. It
Speaker 2: is I the assistant to the regional talk show host,
Speaker 2: and to start off, I just want to thank you
Speaker 2: all for all the support you've given us, and of
Speaker 2: course thank you all again for the prayers that you
Speaker 2: have been saying for us, and I want to ask
Speaker 2: you to continue to do that. Please continue to pray
Speaker 2: for our father. Is home. He is doing better. He
Speaker 2: is of course, still in pain and uncomfortable and very
Speaker 2: very tired. It takes a long time to catch up
Speaker 2: on sleep that you've missed, and he has been missing sleep,
Speaker 2: not just from the hospital, but four months to do
Speaker 2: the show. So I ask that you continue to pray
Speaker 2: for us in all the ways that you have been,
Speaker 2: and I just thank you for that as well. And
Speaker 2: to start, I want to I have a list of
Speaker 2: names here to think and it has gotten very long
Speaker 2: as we haven't done it in a while. So I
Speaker 2: just want to thank Austin M, Ryan F, Kevin F.
Speaker 2: Kimberly S, Margaret, Mary T, James F, Timothy W. Scott C,
Speaker 2: Pete G. HD from NC, Bethany, Deborah T, Joel B,
Speaker 2: TLC sa G. I'm Marty. Thank you so much, Marty,
Speaker 2: you have been truly incredible, Larry I, Karen C, Patrick P,
Speaker 2: Martin K. Lennox, Aaron Feely, Elizabeth H, Deborah T, Michael G,
Speaker 2: Lewis Beeke, Lewis T, Ronald C. Merrily B, Helen T.
Speaker 2: T K from OH. I like those initials. Those are
Speaker 2: good initials. Lewis L, Gary B, Bruce W. Nathaniel C. R.
Speaker 2: Hunt G. Thank you all so much. You are amazing
Speaker 2: and you are the reason that we are able to
Speaker 2: continue doing this show, and without you, the show does
Speaker 2: not continue. So thank you all again. We really do
Speaker 2: appreciate it. And to start, as I said, I think
Speaker 2: we're going to look at Cash Betel and Dan Bongenio
Speaker 2: dan Bongino waffling on what happened with January the sixth.
Speaker 2: Of course, these Dan Bongino has been courting the right
Speaker 2: wing for a very long time and basically espousing whatever
Speaker 2: the right wing has been saying at the moment, and
Speaker 2: as and now that he's back into some kind of
Speaker 2: position of power, he immediately starts to go with the
Speaker 2: party line. And I have a short clip here which
Speaker 2: we are going to play, and then we'll take a
Speaker 2: look at the article.
Speaker 4: You're getting answers on January sixth. You're getting answers on
Speaker 4: what sourcing was utilized, what money was utilized, how many
Speaker 4: assets were utilized, who made those decisions?
Speaker 2: You're getting it.
Speaker 4: We can only control the but you're getting it from
Speaker 4: the FBI.
Speaker 5: Were there FBI agents undercover egging people on?
Speaker 2: Like I said, that answer is look at the way
Speaker 2: he looked away.
Speaker 4: The American public could go back and look at what
Speaker 4: our predecessors stated to Congress under oath that there were
Speaker 4: no FBI sources utilized in and around January sixth. I'm
Speaker 4: going to leave it at that, but go play the
Speaker 4: videotape and look for this material.
Speaker 6: Coming to Congress.
Speaker 2: Yes, very very noncommittal. He refuses to make any sort
Speaker 2: of real statement regarding things. And I think at this point,
Speaker 2: after all the videos we've seen, we can all agree
Speaker 2: that there were assets of some sort being utilized during
Speaker 2: January sixth. We have seen over and over again people
Speaker 2: being egged on to break through barriers, or push through barriers,
Speaker 2: or remove barriers, or just let into the White House.
Speaker 2: This was some kind of deep state operation that was
Speaker 2: absolutely utilized to hammer the poor people that got Don't
Speaker 2: I feel bad saying suckered, but basically suckered into going
Speaker 2: there and being utilized for this. But this article is
Speaker 2: on Liberty Daily. The Liberty Daily, Cash Betel and Dan
Speaker 2: Bongino asked point blank was the FBI egging people on
Speaker 2: during January sixth. The two top two officials at the
Speaker 2: Federal Bureau of Investigation appeared on national television Sunday to
Speaker 2: clarify numerous mysteries, including the FBI's role in the US
Speaker 2: capital mayhem on January sixth, twenty twenty one. And from
Speaker 2: that clip, I don't think they clarified anything, do you.
Speaker 2: They simply said, well, when this comes out, be sure
Speaker 2: to look for this and look at what's already been
Speaker 2: put out. Cash Betel didn't say anything at all. He
Speaker 2: simply said, just wait and see, wait and see. Cash
Speaker 2: is probably a crooked as his nose is. The two
Speaker 2: assassination attempts on President Donald Trump and the purported suicide
Speaker 2: if convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. That's another one where I
Speaker 2: have an article buried in the stack somewhere. But Cash
Speaker 2: and Bongino are both very, very obsequious when it comes
Speaker 2: to the party line, and they're both in on the whole. Well,
Speaker 2: Jeffrey Epstein definitely committed suicide. He definitely committed suicide. Guys,
Speaker 2: I know what a suicide looks like. I've worked around
Speaker 2: these types of things before. Yes, of course, Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 2: committed suicide. We all know it. Of course. If there's
Speaker 2: one thing we do know of all the things we don't,
Speaker 2: it's that Jeffrey Epstein did not commit suicide. I would
Speaker 2: bet a lot of money on that. Whether he's still
Speaker 2: alive on an island somewhere or was killed by some
Speaker 2: member of the crime cartel he was a member of
Speaker 2: remains to be seen, which we probably never will. But
Speaker 2: he definitely did not kill himself. Appearing on Sunday Morning
Speaker 2: Futures with Maria Bartiromo the Fox News Channel, FBI director
Speaker 2: Cash Betel sa January six what was the FBI doing. Well,
Speaker 2: we've got answers coming. We just found a trove of information.
Speaker 2: It's on its way to Capol Hill right now. And
Speaker 2: they've asked that and they're getting them, and you're getting
Speaker 2: the answers on January sixth.
Speaker 1: This is part of the problem.
Speaker 2: They continually defer and send this information to politicians first.
Speaker 2: If if they truly cared about making sure this information
Speaker 2: got out, it would just be immediately put out to
Speaker 2: the people. But they don't. And you can make all
Speaker 2: kinds of justifications, Oh, it's national security.
Speaker 6: Oh it's this.
Speaker 2: Oh they've got to follow the chain of command. Who cares?
Speaker 2: This is simply another way of scrubbing information, making sure
Speaker 2: that whoever has a problem with it can filter whatever
Speaker 2: they want out of it before the American people get
Speaker 2: to see anything. They'll make sure it is utterly neutered
Speaker 2: and unimpactful. Whatever is released, this is nothing. It will
Speaker 2: be nothing when it is released, if it ever is released.
Speaker 2: We've seen them dancing around with the Epstein papers. What
Speaker 2: was that two months ago? Three months ago? Now, can't
Speaker 2: even keep track of time. But they promised it would
Speaker 2: be released and still nothing and we will never see
Speaker 2: anything of substance. We've got a comment from Sprumford. You
Speaker 2: don't get to this level of power without towing the
Speaker 2: party line. Yes, that's exactly right. They don't let you
Speaker 2: through the gate if you don't play their game. That's
Speaker 2: how it is. They simply just refuse to let you play.
Speaker 2: And that's all they have to do. All they have
Speaker 2: to do is make sure that you either can't get
Speaker 2: funding or can't get support. It is not difficult to
Speaker 2: ensure that you never ever have access. It is very
Speaker 2: very They've made it an incredibly expensive undertaking to run
Speaker 2: for any kind of office, and you need basically the
Speaker 2: backing of one of these millionaires or billionaires to fund
Speaker 2: a campaign at this point, because it is very, very
Speaker 2: hard to get the level of ground roots, ground root
Speaker 2: support that it takes to fund a campaign. At this point.
Speaker 2: I mean, the cost of the presidential campaign has become enormous,
Speaker 2: and all the other campaigns have followed suit. Every other
Speaker 2: office has risen over the years as well. Cash Pttel said,
Speaker 2: we can only control the FBI, as you heard them
Speaker 2: in that clip, But you're getting it from the FBI.
Speaker 2: That's right. The FBI has investigated the FBI, and I'm
Speaker 2: sure that they will be completely honest with their findings.
Speaker 2: We've investigated ourselves and found we've done nothing wrong. Unbiased,
Speaker 2: of course. Bar Remo asked Pattel point blank, were their
Speaker 2: FBI agents undercover egging people on? That answer is coming
Speaker 2: and it's on its way to Congress, he replied, it's
Speaker 2: on its way to Congress. They don't work for you.
Speaker 2: I don't believe they even work for Congress. I think
Speaker 2: they are a power unto themselves, and they will do
Speaker 2: whatever they want whenever they want. They have they are
Speaker 2: not beholden to anybody because they are the power behind
Speaker 2: the throne. In my opinion, these people have technology to
Speaker 2: do whatever they want they I mean, we've seen it
Speaker 2: with the was it Frank Church hearings, with the CIA's
Speaker 2: heart attack gun, and that was decades ago. Who knows
Speaker 2: what kind of blackmail material and ways of eliminating people
Speaker 2: they have.
Speaker 3: Now?
Speaker 2: Do you think any of these politicians have enough of
Speaker 2: a spine to risk that not a chance?
Speaker 6: Well, it's just such an open secret. Like, do you
Speaker 6: really think there were no FBI agent secking people on?
Speaker 6: That is all the FBI does anymore?
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean the FBI. Do you think they would
Speaker 2: gin up and help someone do something. No, they would
Speaker 2: never find some poor depressed loaner and egg them on
Speaker 2: into some kind of weird terrorist plot. No, they would
Speaker 2: never do that. Of course we haven't seen them do that.
Speaker 2: Who knows how many times at this point. That is
Speaker 2: all the FBI does. We dug far and wide to
Speaker 2: find it, and I'm pretty sure now we have a conclusive,
Speaker 2: definitive answer. But you and the public are going to
Speaker 2: have it. You're going to see it in writing over
Speaker 2: to Capital Hill. That's right, folks, it's going over to
Speaker 2: Capitol Hill. And everyone knows only good things happen on
Speaker 2: Capitol Hill, only good things for the American people. There's
Speaker 2: a difference between an agent Bongino caution, meaning a trained
Speaker 2: GS eighteen eleven federal agent and a source or an asset.
Speaker 2: They're they're quibbling over points here, whether you're an employed
Speaker 2: member of the FBI versus someone who they have paid
Speaker 2: for information, or someone who works with the FBI in
Speaker 2: some kind of capacity. They are equiminal. Bongino is quibbling
Speaker 2: over terminology here, and so I am sure that if
Speaker 2: they do admit that there are people there, they will
Speaker 2: not be admitting that there were agents there. They will say, oh, well,
Speaker 2: this was a this was a source, this was an asset.
Speaker 2: He doesn't actually work for the FBI. He has just
Speaker 2: worked with the FBI and he went beyond his scope
Speaker 2: under these circumstances. So we are faultless. In my opinion,
Speaker 2: that'll be the most they'd ever admit.
Speaker 6: And that would be why they use people with plausible
Speaker 6: deniability instead of their full time agents, if in fact
Speaker 6: these people aren't actually full time agents and all but.
Speaker 2: Name, yeah, exactly. It gives them. As Lance said, deniability
Speaker 2: allows him to go, well, he's not on the books,
Speaker 2: he's not on our books. He just you know, he
Speaker 2: occasionally sends us some tips or something. There's difference between
Speaker 2: agents and assets.
Speaker 1: Blah blah blah.
Speaker 2: Arguing over terminology again, who cares? Pattel said, I want
Speaker 2: the American public to go back and look at what
Speaker 2: our predecessors stated to Congress under oath, that there were
Speaker 2: no FBI sources utilized in and around January sixth. I'm
Speaker 2: going to leave it at that. Go play the videotape
Speaker 2: and look for this material coming to Congress, coming to
Speaker 2: a Congress near you soon, Folks get excited. It's the
Speaker 2: blockbuster hit of the summer. Soon the FBI will admit
Speaker 2: what it did during January sixth. You'll get the Epstein
Speaker 2: files and it is going to be fantastic. It'll be amazing.
Speaker 2: They're going to declassify all the secrets and they're going
Speaker 2: to let you into Area fifty one to see the
Speaker 2: little gray aliens too. Do any of us actually believe
Speaker 2: this at this point? I have no faith in these people.
Speaker 2: I have no faith that anything will change. I think
Speaker 2: that's enough looking at this sort of waffling nonsense. Who
Speaker 2: cares cash, Betel Dan Bongino just part of the power
Speaker 2: structure and they will do whatever it takes to maintain it.
Speaker 2: So yesterday we talked about how Joe Biden was diagnosed
Speaker 2: with prostate cancer, and this morning, when I was again
Speaker 2: covering for more articles, I saw this and it Scott
Speaker 2: Adams reveals prostate cancer diagnosis. And you all know we
Speaker 2: are not fans of Scott Adams. Here on the show,
Speaker 2: We've had ideological differences with him, but this is very
Speaker 2: sad for Scott Adams. I do not rejoice in the
Speaker 2: fact that he has prostate cancer. We should all be
Speaker 2: praying for him and hoping that he can recover, but
Speaker 2: it doesn't look like it is treatable, and this is very,
Speaker 2: very sad for his family. I don't know what family
Speaker 2: he has, but that can't be easy to learn. Scott Adams,
Speaker 2: the influential author, cartoonist, and pundit, revealed Monday that he
Speaker 2: is suffering from metastasized prostate cancer, the same diagnosis President
Speaker 2: Joe Biden reported the day before. I have the same
Speaker 2: cancer that Joe Biden has, Adams said, I also have
Speaker 2: prostate cancer that has spread to my bones. My life
Speaker 2: expectancy is maybe this summer. He said that he was
Speaker 2: considering ending his own life, as California law allows using
Speaker 2: self administered drugs. I'm in pain, he said, I'm always
Speaker 2: in pain. He said he had relied on a walker
Speaker 2: for several months owing to both cancer and acute arthritis. Again,
Speaker 2: there are no fans of Scott Adams's political takes here,
Speaker 2: but we should remember that we should pray for our enemies.
Speaker 2: He was very, very wrong about COVID. He sold out
Speaker 2: a lot of people. But this is still a tragedy
Speaker 2: for him and his family, and we should pray that
Speaker 2: he knows the Lord knows Jesus Christ, and hopefully that
Speaker 2: he can find healing. But we should at least be
Speaker 2: praying at We should definitely be praying for his salvation.
Speaker 2: That is the key thing. So I just wanted to
Speaker 2: bring that to your attention. We should not be vindicted,
Speaker 2: vindictive or joyous when people that we disagree with suffer setbacks.
Speaker 2: Perhaps I was a bit too flippant with Joe Biden yesterday,
Speaker 2: but it is more difficult with him, and we have
Speaker 2: some We have a comment here from KWD sixty eight.
Speaker 2: All of this is show distraction, dog Fort Knox, deportation,
Speaker 2: follow up media. Nothing is being done, just sound bites
Speaker 2: and photo ops.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 2: It is about distraction. They never give you anything of substance.
Speaker 2: It is simply about occupying your mind for the moment
Speaker 2: while they go on behind the scenes with whatever they
Speaker 2: were doing. It is always continually to make sure that
Speaker 2: nothing ever changes. If they can keep you busy with,
Speaker 2: you know, rearranging the set, rearranging the deck chairs on
Speaker 2: the Titanic. You will never have to you will never
Speaker 2: care too much about what's actually going on the uh.
Speaker 2: The actors change, but the play remains the same. And
Speaker 2: I actually want to say if i'd like to take
Speaker 2: more comments on the show today. So if you've got
Speaker 2: comments or questions or anything that you just want to
Speaker 2: talk about, leave comments and direct them towards the you
Speaker 2: know account, and Lance will try and grab them put
Speaker 2: them up. So yeah, I'd like to hear from a
Speaker 2: lot of the audience today. I'm feeling feel like could
Speaker 2: use some more questions and comments here on the show.
Speaker 2: I would like to be more interactive, and today we're
Speaker 2: going to bounce around a lot. We spent a lot
Speaker 2: of time on the IVF suicide bomber yesterday, and so
Speaker 2: I'd just like to get a general sense of what's
Speaker 2: going on. We're not going to dig too deeply on
Speaker 2: too many things today. I saw this article and it's
Speaker 2: on bright Bart and it is by Amy fer.
Speaker 7: Watch.
Speaker 2: Chicago mayor Brandon Johnson says he favors hiring black staff
Speaker 2: because they are the Earth's most generous race. This is
Speaker 2: again more racial idolatry, racial ethno ethno narcissism is a
Speaker 2: good term that I've seen thrown around when it comes
Speaker 2: to this sort of thing. People tend to idolize their
Speaker 2: own race, certain types of individuals. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson
Speaker 2: made some controversial statements on Sunday while speaking about why
Speaker 2: he hires so many black citizens to work for the
Speaker 2: same While speaking to the congregation at the Apostolic Church
Speaker 2: of God in Woodlawn, Johnson made the statements that brought
Speaker 2: criticism online. MRCTV reported MRCTV is where Guard Goldsmith does
Speaker 2: a lot of work. Guard Goldsmith is a fantastic, fantastic man.
Speaker 2: He has a great mind for news and has a
Speaker 2: good grasp of what the founding fathers intended for this country.
Speaker 2: I encourage you to go check him out Liberty Conspiracy,
Speaker 2: Guard Goldsmith on substack. Just go check out his work.
Speaker 2: Fantastic guy, fantastic information. Also just a lot of very
Speaker 2: interesting stories regarding his time when he's worked in the
Speaker 2: entertainment industry. So lots of good information there. But back
Speaker 2: to the story, some detractors that will push back on
Speaker 2: me and say the only thing the mayor talks about
Speaker 2: is the hiring of black people. Now what I'm saying
Speaker 2: is when you hire your you hire our people. We
Speaker 2: always look out for everyone else. We are the most
Speaker 2: generous people on the planet. Johnson said, and again, this
Speaker 2: is racial idolatry, ethno narcissism. This entire myopic.
Speaker 6: They you could just call it racism. It's simply what
Speaker 6: it is. I mean, replace black with white and anyone
Speaker 6: would call it racism and white supremacy. So clearly this
Speaker 6: is black supremacy.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I like I personally like ethno narcissism because it
Speaker 2: to me hones in on a more specific part of
Speaker 2: the racism, in the sense that it is directly about
Speaker 2: worshiping your own race and not necessarily directed outwards at
Speaker 2: other people. Though I guess this is also directed outwards
Speaker 2: because if you are elevating your own, you are denigrating
Speaker 2: the other to some extent. I don't know too many
Speaker 2: cultures that have play cousins. That's how generous we are.
Speaker 2: We just don't we just make somebody a family member, right,
Speaker 2: That's how we are. Okay, mister Johnson, do you mind
Speaker 2: if I do you mind? Actually, let's mister Brandon, you
Speaker 2: mind if I call you Brandon? Let's uh, everyone does that.
Speaker 2: Everyone has good friends that show up at your house
Speaker 2: and hang out for long periods of time, and our
Speaker 2: borderline inducted into the family. That is not something just
Speaker 2: black people do. Every race does that.
Speaker 6: That's also just the weirdness of that statement that he
Speaker 6: doesn't think all the races have friends. Like, how insular
Speaker 6: is this guy?
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's an utterly myopic view and shows that he
Speaker 2: has probably very rarely interacted with other races. You've probably
Speaker 2: not spent much time around, you know, Whites, latinos Asians.
Speaker 2: Some of our best friends growing up were Asian and
Speaker 2: they are borderline part of our family. We're borderline part
Speaker 2: of theirs. That's simply how it is you make friends.
Speaker 2: And again, it's just a completely and utterly myopic and
Speaker 2: reductive view of this sort of thing. We're the only
Speaker 2: race that does this, We're the only race that does that.
Speaker 2: That is not true. Certain races are better at certain things,
Speaker 2: but as a general rule, there are outliers and single
Speaker 2: community who will engage in different behaviors. That's just how
Speaker 2: it is. There is no there is no hard and
Speaker 2: fast line when it comes to this. There are trends
Speaker 2: and there are probabilities but there is no certainty. But
Speaker 2: I just thought that was again a quick look at that.
Speaker 2: So yeap Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson knows nothing about anyone
Speaker 2: else and simply idolizes his own race.
Speaker 6: And if it were a white guy saying that about
Speaker 6: white people, there would be cries for impeachment. Yeah, he
Speaker 6: would be supremacy.
Speaker 2: He'd be run out of town on a rail, he
Speaker 2: would be excoriated. We've got a comment from Fort Love
Speaker 2: of the Road. Whatever happened to that documentary about arthritis
Speaker 2: that you ran, Karen went down to South or Central America?
Speaker 2: Remember I do remember, And in fact, the man who's
Speaker 2: producing it, Mark Hall, producing and directing. Mark Hall, man
Speaker 2: of many talents and a very very good man, is well.
Speaker 2: He produced killing ed the documentary about the Muslim charter schools,
Speaker 2: So go check that out if you haven't seen it.
Speaker 2: And he actually came up recently to do some more filming.
Speaker 2: So we shot some more here and did another interview
Speaker 2: follow up. Gave him my take on how I thought
Speaker 2: the treatments worked. And so it's still in editing. Producing
Speaker 2: a documentary like this is a it's not a small feat.
Speaker 2: Mark is very very particular and he has a great,
Speaker 2: great cameraman that works with him. So they work very
Speaker 2: very hard to make sure that it is well researched,
Speaker 2: well thought out, and looks great too. So it is
Speaker 2: a it's a labor of love as well. So it
Speaker 2: will be coming out. It's still in the process of
Speaker 2: being worked on. I don't want to say anything because
Speaker 2: I don't want to spoil anything, but it is still
Speaker 2: coming out. You can bet your bottom dollar on that.
Speaker 2: Mark Hall, go check out his documentaries. And this is
Speaker 2: also on right Bart. This is another just sort of
Speaker 2: dei nonsense by John Nolty. Nolty, USC professor says OSCAR
Speaker 2: diversity rules not woke enough. That's right, folks, Hollywood is
Speaker 2: not woke enough. You have owned. They have only just
Speaker 2: begun to woke. The sun has barely crested the horizon
Speaker 2: for these people. They are just getting woked as we speak.
Speaker 2: They're brewing the coffee. Their eyes are still partially closed.
Speaker 2: According to doctor Stacy Smith, a USC professor and founder
Speaker 2: of something called the Annenberg Inclusion Initiative, says the stupid
Speaker 2: and bigoted diversity inclusion rules the Academy of Motion Pictures,
Speaker 2: Arts and Science has already laid down in order to
Speaker 2: ensure your movie qualifies from Oscar.
Speaker 1: Are not woke enough.
Speaker 2: That's right, folks, All this garbage, the absolute dogge role
Speaker 2: that has been produced by Hollywood over the last I
Speaker 2: mean it's been it's been bad for a long time,
Speaker 2: but over the last decade it has gotten just terrible,
Speaker 2: worse and worse continually. Not woke enough.
Speaker 6: In other words, doctors dying. They just haven't gone far
Speaker 6: left far enough fast enough. They need even more ridiculous wells.
Speaker 2: Exactly, we need more girl bosses, folks. We have not
Speaker 2: had enough girl bosses. I demand twenty more girl bosses
Speaker 2: on my desk by this afternoon. In other words, doctor
Speaker 2: Smith is demanding the Academy increases its racial, sex and
Speaker 2: sexual preference discrimination. That's right, we need more gay black
Speaker 2: men in movies. As Bright Barton who's reported previously, the
Speaker 2: Academy already requires an indefensible amount of illegal and moral
Speaker 2: discrimination to qualify for an Academy award. This lunatic wants
Speaker 2: even more bigotry.
Speaker 7: That's right.
Speaker 2: To even get considered for one of these worthless garbage awards,
Speaker 2: you have to include their little pet projects in them.
Speaker 2: You have to have a certain number of minorities, a
Speaker 2: certain number of sexual minorities, all kinds of different things.
Speaker 2: And I bet, whether it's specified or not, you have
Speaker 2: to pay lip service to a lot of very specific ideologies.
Speaker 2: Doctor Stacy Smith said she started laughing. In the Academy
Speaker 2: of Motion Pictures, Arts and Science has shared their standards
Speaker 2: to representation and inclusion for OSCARS eligibility in twenty twenty,
Speaker 2: The Far Left Raft reported she believes that even by
Speaker 2: these standards, ninety to ninety five percent of films are
Speaker 2: already past the test. That's right, since it is not
Speaker 2: hyper hyper leftists, and the garbage that Hollywood makes automatically
Speaker 2: falls into these categories, it can't be woke. It can't
Speaker 2: be woke since it just happens.
Speaker 6: More than nineties and ninety five percent of let's stuff
Speaker 6: coming out of Washington, out of Hollywood anymore, is unwatchable.
Speaker 2: Because of this, I can't remember the last time I
Speaker 2: saw a trailer and thought something looked good. It used
Speaker 2: to be you know. Full disclosure, I.
Speaker 1: Do like movies.
Speaker 2: It's one of my guilty pleasures. I like to sit
Speaker 2: there and I like to somewhat turn my brain off
Speaker 2: and enjoy a blockbuster, but they have made it impossible
Speaker 2: with how overt the propaganda is, and it has become
Speaker 2: insufferable just to see the way they hammer these things.
Speaker 2: My wife and I will occasionally watch some TV in
Speaker 2: during the evening after our son has fallen asleep. We've
Speaker 2: been watching a cop show. I won't tell you which
Speaker 2: one it is, because you guys wouldn't want to watch
Speaker 2: it anyway. But every single time they introduce a new character,
Speaker 2: it's some superwoman that is utterly, utterly flawless and makes
Speaker 2: the male lead look like an idiot. By comparison, they
Speaker 2: have no way. They are incapable of writing a woman
Speaker 2: that has, you know, realistic flaws. She has to be
Speaker 2: this personification of perfection, this avatar of the platonic ideal
Speaker 2: of a woman, and it makes them insufferable. Every man
Speaker 2: has to be a bumbling idiot by comparison, I am
Speaker 2: driving my wife insane by continually complaining about it. She's
Speaker 2: very very kind to put up with me sitting there
Speaker 2: ranting and raving about TV and movies.
Speaker 7: When she puts it, the.
Speaker 2: Number of times that I have forced her to heave
Speaker 2: a heavy sigh and turn something off because she simply
Speaker 2: cannot stand to hear me complain anymore. Is I appreciate
Speaker 2: her being willing to put up with me. You will
Speaker 2: never sell mainstream audiences on homosexuality.
Speaker 1: Never.
Speaker 2: It's been tried and rejected over and over again. When
Speaker 2: most of the public is heterosexual, that means most of
Speaker 2: the public will be made uncomfortable by anything involving same
Speaker 2: sex intimacy. Yeah, it's a It is alarming the number
Speaker 2: of times they try to force this, the number of
Speaker 2: times I am forced to cringe and look away as
Speaker 2: they try to make this a common, you know, a
Speaker 2: normalized portion of society. I'm just uncomfortable. It doesn't mean
Speaker 2: gay romance movie you should not get produced.
Speaker 6: I don't know.
Speaker 2: Movies should be made for everyone, But to hairy guys
Speaker 2: necking in a three hundred million dollar super movie Nope.
Speaker 2: Two teenage boys crushing on each other in a Disney cartoon, Nope,
Speaker 2: not gonna fly ever. That's right, folks, it just doesn't
Speaker 2: work for the average American. They and this is with
Speaker 2: the level of propaganda they've engaged in over the decades.
Speaker 2: Can you imagine how uncomfortable and disgusted we would all
Speaker 2: be if we were the America of the nineteen fifties,
Speaker 2: it would truly be unbelievable as far as raith and
Speaker 2: a race and ethnicity that is not an American problem.
Speaker 2: When I was growing up in the eighties, Oprah was
Speaker 2: the biggest thing on daytime TV. Pun intended, Bill Cosby
Speaker 2: was the biggest on primetime TV. Ooh Bill Cosby, Poor
Speaker 2: poor us, poor us.
Speaker 7: They have our.
Speaker 2: Sinio Hall proved Johnny Carson could be beat. Eddie Murphy
Speaker 2: was the number one movie star, Richard Pryor was the
Speaker 2: number one comedian, and Little White Girls all of America
Speaker 2: had posters Michael Jackson while still black, and Prince on
Speaker 2: their bedroom walls. I don't understand the love for Prince.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna be perfectly honest again, this could be me
Speaker 2: being utterly uncultured and having terrible tastes in music. But Prince,
Speaker 2: if he couldn't play guitar or whatever it is he plays,
Speaker 2: I'm pretty sure it's guitar, he would be known as
Speaker 2: nothing but a short pervert. He would be some small
Speaker 2: towns problem, you know. He would be the guy that
Speaker 2: people like, oh he's here again. Great, He's seen as
Speaker 2: a ladies man. But maybe it's just because he's right
Speaker 2: at eye level, you know, he can make good conversation
Speaker 2: with him.
Speaker 6: I don't.
Speaker 2: I don't understand the love for Prince. He always seemed
Speaker 2: like a weird, weird man to me, would not someone
Speaker 2: I would have invited over to my house. As far
Speaker 2: as gender, women have been huge movie stars, going back
Speaker 2: to Mary Pickford straight through to Julia Roberts and Sandra Bullock. Well,
Speaker 2: Sandra Bullock's a little one note for me. She kind
Speaker 2: of she can basically only do one kind of character.
Speaker 2: So while she does appear in a lot of movies,
Speaker 2: she again one note, not a great actress. So the
Speaker 2: problem with gender, race, and ethnicity is overseas audiences they
Speaker 2: are the racist and sexist, not us. And I personally
Speaker 2: disagree with John Nulty here. I don't believe while they
Speaker 2: might be racist, I don't think it's inherently incumbent on
Speaker 2: them to not want to want to see this kind
Speaker 2: of thing they have their Again, we're imposing our own
Speaker 2: cultural values on them, like why should they want to
Speaker 2: have to deal with America's own insanity with the DEI
Speaker 2: that has been forced on Hollywood. But yeah, Hollywood not
Speaker 2: woke enough. They can never be woke enough for these people.
Speaker 2: And of course it is coming from a university professor.
Speaker 2: The Frankfurt School has done irreparable damage to our intellectual
Speaker 2: institutions and we may never recover from that. That is
Speaker 2: just how it is. And I saw this on the
Speaker 2: Free Thought Project. I thought it was I thought it
Speaker 2: was a good article and ties in fairly nicely to
Speaker 2: talking about Hollywood. He's more talking about the news media here,
Speaker 2: but talking about how to make your mind harder for
Speaker 2: the propaganda's to manipulate. And if there is one thing
Speaker 2: that Hollywood is, it is propaganda. It has been since
Speaker 2: its inception, and it won't continue continue to be until
Speaker 2: the time it no longer exists. That is simply it's
Speaker 2: that's its purpose, how to make your mind harder for
Speaker 2: the propaganda to manipulate. The domestic propaganda that Westerners are
Speaker 2: fed by the powerful does not typically consist of whole
Speaker 2: cloth fabrications, but rather of distortions, have truths manipulated, emphasis
Speaker 2: and lies by a mission. Caitlin Johnstone. The worst mistake
Speaker 2: you can make when reading the news is to assume
Speaker 2: there's a good reason why the mass meet a report
Speaker 2: on something in the way that they do. That there's
Speaker 2: a good reason why Israel Palestine gets framed as a complex,
Speaker 2: morally ambiguous issue with no clear path forward, even though
Speaker 2: it all looks pretty self evident to you. There must
Speaker 2: be a valid and legitimate reason why one story gets
Speaker 2: more coverage than a seemingly far more important story, like
Speaker 2: how the release of one Israeli American hostile they're just
Speaker 2: currently getting far more news media coverage than the deliberate
Speaker 2: starvation of an entire enclave full of civilians. Well, personally,
Speaker 2: I do think there is a good reason for it.
Speaker 2: It is because that is how they want it. There
Speaker 2: are powers behind the scenes that are specifically making sure
Speaker 2: that the stories are reported in a specific way. We've
Speaker 2: seen it over and over again with those videos of
Speaker 2: the reporters, the news anchors, all of them saying the
Speaker 2: exact same thing, just over and over. There are many
Speaker 2: compilations like that, no truth in them. Let them go broke. Yes,
Speaker 2: Hollywood deserves to go broke, and they are bleeding money.
Speaker 2: And I believe Lance has a comment about this as well.
Speaker 2: All right, so much Western ignorance is facilitated by the
Speaker 2: manipultive way the imperial media report on what's going on
Speaker 2: in the world. People assume that because they're not hearing
Speaker 2: about a given issue all the time or in a
Speaker 2: particularly urgent tone of reporting, and must not be an
Speaker 2: especially important matter that needs their attention. They assume that
Speaker 2: if one side of a conflict isn't framed as being
Speaker 2: clearly in the wrong, then it must not be. The
Speaker 2: average American has an incredibly simplistic view of and.
Speaker 6: There are nations, tongues, tribes, borders, languages, and cultures, but
Speaker 6: in the end, it comes down to two races of
Speaker 6: whether you're racing to Christ or away from him.
Speaker 7: That's right.
Speaker 2: Our cultural and racial differences are far less important than
Speaker 2: those distinctions, and in fact do not matter at all
Speaker 2: in the light of eternity. There are two races, as
Speaker 2: he said, and it depends on which way you're racing.
Speaker 2: We're all children of Adam. Westerners assume that if the
Speaker 2: world were experiencing another Holocaust, another Transatlantic slave trade, another
Speaker 2: Cuban missile cross crisis, they'd hear about it in the
Speaker 2: news that an approp level of urgency. But that simply
Speaker 2: isn't how it works exactly. Emphasis is a huge way
Speaker 2: they play with things. They you've got to care more
Speaker 2: about the Kardashians or whoever. Are they still relevant? I
Speaker 2: don't know. I haven't seen I haven't even seen a tabloid,
Speaker 2: and I don't know how long they used to be
Speaker 2: all over the grocery stores, but I have not been
Speaker 2: into one in a long time. I don't even know
Speaker 2: who the current trending stars are. And thankfully I don't
Speaker 2: have a TikTok, so I don't have to care about
Speaker 2: that sort of thing. But that simply isn't how it works.
Speaker 2: The only reason Western public is ever told about anything
Speaker 2: bad that happens at a high level of frequency and urgency,
Speaker 2: so when it's convenient for the Western Empire, like when
Speaker 2: Russia invaded Ukraine. When that happened, it was the main
Speaker 2: story and every Western outlet for ages and Russia was
Speaker 2: fairly framed as the evil aggressor was clearly framed I misspoke,
Speaker 2: as the evil aggressor, with all the NATO aggressions which
Speaker 2: provoke the evasion going completely unmentioned.
Speaker 7: That's right.
Speaker 5: They know.
Speaker 2: The American people are completely ignorant of the history of
Speaker 2: the area and of the history of NATO and the
Speaker 2: aggression and the color revolution that the US fomented in Ukraine.
Speaker 2: All they see is a much larger country invading a
Speaker 2: much smaller country, and they go ooh, he a bully.
Speaker 2: Putin's a bully, and therefore this is bad and we
Speaker 2: should stop them, and all the Ukrainians have to die
Speaker 2: so that I can feel good about myself. And this
Speaker 2: stuff I post on Facebook ok WD sixty eight. Oprah
Speaker 2: was an early example to me of someone placed by
Speaker 2: the elite. I had a high school journalism book forty
Speaker 2: years ago that had a profile of her. I have
Speaker 2: never seen more than thirty seconds of Oprah attago. We've
Speaker 2: played some clips of her on the shows, and I
Speaker 2: have never heard her say anything that I thought was
Speaker 2: remotely insightful. I cannot believe that millions upon millions of
Speaker 2: people tuned in to watch this buffoon over the years.
Speaker 2: It is hard.
Speaker 7: Again.
Speaker 2: The things that people watch continue to baffle me. There
Speaker 2: so incredibly vapid and pointless and empty that it makes
Speaker 2: me physically cringe and feel revulsion at the thought of
Speaker 2: wasting my time with them. I have my own vices
Speaker 2: that I like to waste my time with, but at
Speaker 2: least they require some form of engagement with them. Oprah
Speaker 2: seems to be just this utterly, utterly empty spectacle. It's
Speaker 2: not even it's not even a good circus, and the
Speaker 2: bread is stale. So what are we gonna do. Most
Speaker 2: of the worst things the US and its allies are
Speaker 2: going in, most of the worst things the US and
Speaker 2: its allies are doing in the world are reported accurately
Speaker 2: by the Western press at certain times and in certain publications,
Speaker 2: but they simply are not given any emphasis and amplification
Speaker 2: after those brief mentions. If you look at the hyperlinks
Speaker 2: I cite in my articles to describe the criminality of
Speaker 2: the Empire, it's usually either straight out of the mainstream
Speaker 2: press or some other independent author who's citing mainstream news reporting. Yes,
Speaker 2: they will cover it once just so that they can
Speaker 2: and say they did at some point, and if someone
Speaker 2: calls them on it, they can say, look, we talked
Speaker 2: about it. The difference is that I regularly spotlight those admissions,
Speaker 2: while the imperial media will mention them once halfway down
Speaker 2: an article somewhere and then let the daily news turn
Speaker 2: carry it away down the memory hole. This is a
Speaker 2: tactic that has long been used in law fair If
Speaker 2: people are engaged in some kind of legal battle and
Speaker 2: they request information.
Speaker 7: One.
Speaker 2: You can try to stone all them, but chances are
Speaker 2: you will be required to turn over things. So another
Speaker 2: tactic is to bury them with documentation. You turn over everything, everything, everything,
Speaker 2: You turn over the most useless, irrelevant thing you can
Speaker 2: think of, anything even remotely related to hope that they
Speaker 2: cannot dig through the mountain that of paperwork that you
Speaker 2: send them. It is another version of that, just burying
Speaker 2: you with information in hopes that you can't find the
Speaker 2: relevant thing. Western propaganda doesn't consist so much of manipulating
Speaker 2: what gets your reported, but how it gets reported. How
Speaker 2: often something gets mentioned, how often the perpetrator of an
Speaker 2: abuse is explicitly named, the type of language used to
Speaker 2: describe a given offense. These adjustments might sound insignificant when
Speaker 2: they are described, but when put into practice across the board,
Speaker 2: they're extremely effective at shaping public perception of world affairs.
Speaker 2: They are this, in my opinion, is where these people
Speaker 2: excel in manipulation, in controlling narratives, and in using that
Speaker 2: to shape the way the public thinks about things. They
Speaker 2: have spent years studying how to shape and mold the
Speaker 2: human mind into the way that they want it, and
Speaker 2: they have gotten very very adept at it. The only
Speaker 2: way to get around this is to maintain an acute
Speaker 2: awareness of what's being reported while ignoring distorting factors like frequency, emphasis,
Speaker 2: and tone. You have to just focus on the raw
Speaker 2: data of what you're being reported about what the Empire
Speaker 2: is up to from day to day, without allowing your
Speaker 2: perception to be colored by the way and which the
Speaker 2: data is reported. If you come across a key piece
Speaker 2: of information about the empire's communality, got to hold onto
Speaker 2: it and remember its significance for yourself, because the Imperial
Speaker 2: press su aren't going to remind you, going to be
Speaker 2: acting like it never happened by the next week. It's very,
Speaker 2: very difficult to maintain a sense of actually says where
Speaker 2: these things happened. You have to keep notes of links
Speaker 2: and track of them. I had a wonderful article saved
Speaker 2: about how communism destroyed architecture, and the website is now defunct.
Speaker 2: I should have downloaded it as a PDF or screenshot
Speaker 2: it or something, but it's now gone. It had so
Speaker 2: many wonderful sources cited, and now that article is gone
Speaker 2: and I can't find it anywhere. It's not on the
Speaker 2: Wayback machine. It does not exist, and I am forever
Speaker 2: morning that. Every once in a while I still go
Speaker 2: to look for it to see if I can find it,
Speaker 2: but sadly it has been taken from me and I
Speaker 2: lost it due to my own stupid It's bizarre once
Speaker 2: you start noticing how much of a disconnect there is
Speaker 2: between reality and mass meter supporting on world events. They'll
Speaker 2: occasionally mention actual important things, but there's no accurate sense
Speaker 2: of proportionality to any of it. It's like if you're
Speaker 2: at a restaurant with a friend and a waiter's uniform
Speaker 2: caught fire and your friends just casualation. Oh, that guy's
Speaker 2: on fire, before going back to talking about the meal
Speaker 2: for the rest of the conversation. Well, the guy burned
Speaker 2: to death at the other end of the room. It's
Speaker 2: utterly surreal. Yes, gonna and again this is on the
Speaker 2: Free Thought Project. Good article does explain how they manipulate
Speaker 2: media to some extent. They have other tactics, but emphasis
Speaker 2: is certainly part of it. We've got a comment from
Speaker 2: don't frag me bro. Anything associated with TV, music, movies, Hollywood, prosports,
Speaker 2: video games, even spell checkers and software are all tainted
Speaker 2: with the agenda of the death cult. When you can
Speaker 2: pick it out, nothing is entertaining anymore. Yeah, a lot
Speaker 2: of almost everything, almost everything in life has one of
Speaker 2: these freak shows somewhere embedded in the system that created it,
Speaker 2: and as such is tainted. As you said, these people
Speaker 2: are evil, they are Antichrist, they're anti human. They simply
Speaker 2: hate you and me. They hate they hate anything good,
Speaker 2: and you can see that reflected in the things they create.
Speaker 2: Everything that they create is twisted and just disgusting on
Speaker 2: some level. Well, we are going to take a quick
Speaker 2: break and we will be right back.
Speaker 1: Liberty, it's your move, and now the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Welcome back, folks, And again I would like to thank
Speaker 2: you all for the continued prayers for our father. Just
Speaker 2: please continue to do so. He needs a lot of prayers.
Speaker 2: He is back and we are so thankful to have him,
Speaker 2: but we just want to remind you to keep him
Speaker 2: in your prayers for healing. And i'd also ask that
Speaker 2: if you would like to support the show, you can
Speaker 2: do so in many places. You can go to subscribe
Speaker 2: Star dot com, forward slash The David Night Show and
Speaker 2: support us monthly. They will immediately build your credit card
Speaker 2: and there are many, many levels to support us with
Speaker 2: on there. And if you were a supporter, I ask
Speaker 2: that maybe you go check to see if you still are,
Speaker 2: because they will not notify you if it hasn't updated,
Speaker 2: if you had to change your card for any reason,
Speaker 2: or it expired, they won't tell you.
Speaker 7: So you can do that there.
Speaker 2: You can leave a tip on Rumble, you can subscribe
Speaker 2: on kick. You can go to Trends Journal and get
Speaker 2: the amazing publication that Chartzlante puts out weekly. It's a massive,
Speaker 2: massive publication that he works on very very hard, compiles.
Speaker 2: A lot of trends would be implied by the name.
Speaker 2: And if you put in the promo code Night, that
Speaker 2: will get you ten percent off and it works out
Speaker 2: to be about two fifty two fifty a week. I
Speaker 2: believe I think it's two fifty a week. My memory
Speaker 2: is failing me here, but anyway, it's very very cheap,
Speaker 2: cheaper than a cup of coffee nowadays. Or you can
Speaker 2: go to Davidknight dot gold Tony Ardburn has very graciously
Speaker 2: set that up for us to where if you want
Speaker 2: to get gold or silver, gold or silver, you can
Speaker 2: go to David Night dot gold and that'll let him
Speaker 2: know that you're coming through us. And Tony has Wolfpack
Speaker 2: to where you can get gold or silver shipped directly
Speaker 2: to your door on a subscription service. So and if
Speaker 2: there there are other ways you can send a check
Speaker 2: directly through the mail. You can find our PO box
Speaker 2: on the Davidnightshow dot com. There's also an address for Crypto.
Speaker 2: We really do appreciate all the support you all have
Speaker 2: given us over the years. The hospital bills are going
Speaker 2: to be very expensive, so we're I'm doing a little
Speaker 2: bit of plugging. I try not to do it too frequently.
Speaker 2: The prayers are what's most important.
Speaker 1: But again, I just.
Speaker 2: Want to put it out there that I want your
Speaker 2: comments today. I want to be more engaged with the audience.
Speaker 2: I appreciate you all very very much, and I want
Speaker 2: to make sure that I am engaging with you, giving
Speaker 2: and getting feedback on what we're doing here. So if
Speaker 2: you've got questions or comments, want to chitchat about things,
Speaker 2: drop them in there and direct them towards the account
Speaker 2: and Lance will grab them. But this is another article
Speaker 2: from the Free Thought Project, the rise of lab grown
Speaker 2: meat as yet another mechanism for control. And this goes
Speaker 2: into how it's a very specific setup you need for
Speaker 2: this kind of thing. You need a very controlled environment.
Speaker 2: Not many people have what it takes to grow their
Speaker 2: own meat in a lab setting, Whereas you know, farming
Speaker 2: while difficult and takes a specific skill set. Theoretically, if
Speaker 2: you have land you can farm. You know, you can't
Speaker 2: raise your own cattle, it will be difficult. I'm not
Speaker 2: trying to I want to be clear, I'm not denigrating farmers.
Speaker 2: It is a massive amount of work. But theoretically, as
Speaker 2: I said, if you have land, you could teach yourself
Speaker 2: to farm, Whereas you're not just going to set up
Speaker 2: a lab in your basement and culture yourself a ribbi.
Speaker 2: This takes a lot of very specific equipment and in
Speaker 2: my opinion, an extreme lack of ethics and you know,
Speaker 2: a willingness to engage in some kind of weird Frankenstein
Speaker 2: you know, level of science here.
Speaker 6: It's also why they're culling chickens and putting heavier and
Speaker 6: heavier regulations on cows, claiming that you know, cowparts are
Speaker 6: going to destroy the planet. All that's part of this
Speaker 6: food control Ajunga.
Speaker 2: Yes, again, if you don't have food. If you don't
Speaker 2: have a way to supply yourself with food, all I
Speaker 2: have to do is cut it off at the grocery store,
Speaker 2: and there's nothing you can do. So fully encourage you
Speaker 2: to find some way to get outside that system. Get
Speaker 2: yourself some chickens, if you can start growing some vegetables
Speaker 2: or fruits, whatever you can get outside their system, no
Speaker 2: matter what else, no matter what other supplies you have.
Speaker 2: If the worst happens and you don't have food, you
Speaker 2: have nothing. So be sure to look at that first
Speaker 2: before anything else. Tunnel Lord one three three seven. Hey Travis,
Speaker 2: at what time do you plan on having your Friday
Speaker 2: live stream? We I've only really just begun to conceptualize it.
Speaker 2: I haven't put much thought into it besides the fact
Speaker 2: that I'd like to do it on Friday evening. That way,
Speaker 2: we have the full weekend to kind of rest and recuperate.
Speaker 2: If I try to do something on Saturday, it will
Speaker 2: probably end up eating the entire day. It'll mean that
Speaker 2: I have to plan my days around that. Where since
Speaker 2: we're already working on a Friday, it wouldn't be too
Speaker 2: much more work to set up a more casual live stream.
Speaker 2: Later in the evening. But you know, I was thinking,
Speaker 2: actually I'd like some feedback from that on you guys,
Speaker 2: because you know, my schedule is dictated by the show
Speaker 2: and as such I can somewhat workshop it around after
Speaker 2: I'm done with the show. But y'all are the ones
Speaker 2: that this would be for, and I would like to
Speaker 2: get your opinion on what times work best for you.
Speaker 2: So if you've got some preferred time frames, let me know.
Speaker 2: And again, Friday evening is what I'm shooting for, So
Speaker 2: if you've got ideas, if you've got any comments at all,
Speaker 2: please drop them in chat off. Guardian Professor Luke O'Neill
Speaker 2: of Trinity College gave an interview to the show Me
Speaker 2: the Science podcast the Soyance Guys theyans the Scientists are
Speaker 2: Gonna tell Us podcast a few days ago, praising the
Speaker 2: rise of lab grown what uh what despicable little dorks?
Speaker 2: We are ruled by anyone in a lab coat is
Speaker 2: suspect at this point in my opinion. Praising the rise
Speaker 2: of lab grown or cultivated meat and predicting it would
Speaker 2: spell the end of animal farming in the future. The
Speaker 2: emphasis that supposed the need for this transition the biochemist
Speaker 2: side it the widely repeated cliche that farm animals produces
Speaker 2: twelve percent of the world's carbon emissions. Environmentally, it's very
Speaker 2: important because it turns out twelve percent of greenhouse gases
Speaker 2: are coming off of farm animals. Not the greenhouse gases, guys,
Speaker 2: the cows. The cows are killing us. Well, don't you worry, buddy.
Speaker 2: I eat plenty of cow, so I'm doing my part
Speaker 2: to rid us of the cow menace. I've probably devoured
Speaker 2: many multiple cows over the course of my lifetime. Going
Speaker 2: on to laed lab grown meats ethical superiority to real meat.
Speaker 2: One in five people in Europe are vegetarians. That explains
Speaker 2: why Europe is in the state it's in. One in
Speaker 2: five are vegetarianans. Truly, how far Europe has fallen folks
Speaker 2: from the world stage. They've asked them, and many of
Speaker 2: them have said, yes, of course, we would eat lab
Speaker 2: grown meat or vegetarians because we don't like the cruelty
Speaker 2: that happens when farm animals are being killed and we're
Speaker 2: eating them. And again, the factory farms are horrific. They
Speaker 2: have terrible living conditions for the animals. They they're very cruel.
Speaker 2: I don't like what they do with factory farms. I
Speaker 2: try to get my meat. I hate the term because
Speaker 2: it has been tainted by the worst people, imaginal, But
Speaker 2: I do support the idea of a less cruel and
Speaker 2: a disgusting form of farming for the animals that you consume.
Speaker 2: I think that they should be given a good life
Speaker 2: up until we eat them. We're eating them. If you
Speaker 2: can make a steak out of a vat, and no
Speaker 2: animals have been harmed by this in any way at all,
Speaker 2: why wouldn't we eat it? Yeah, vat is not a
Speaker 2: good term, you know, things that are in vats. It's
Speaker 2: another one of those things like lance has. Nothing good
Speaker 2: comes in a swarm, very few good things, And nothing
Speaker 2: that I want to eat comes out.
Speaker 1: Of a vat.
Speaker 2: You know, Oh that's delicious, vat vat steak. Yeah, it's
Speaker 2: perhaps jokingly that farmers should turn their farms into vats
Speaker 2: full of cells growing to make meat. That's right, Just
Speaker 2: convert your farm into a vat warehouse. Just you know,
Speaker 2: it's that simple, guys. And of course he says jokingly,
Speaker 2: but on some level, this guy is not joking. He
Speaker 2: is utterly divorced from reality. So many of these people
Speaker 2: that have gone into these sciences have no concept of
Speaker 2: what actually goes on in the real world. They have
Speaker 2: spent their entire life in this ivory tower of schooling
Speaker 2: and then university and get whisked away into some program
Speaker 2: picked up by some large corporation, and they never actually
Speaker 2: experience the real world at all, and as such are
Speaker 2: utterly disconnected from the rest of us. That's part of
Speaker 2: why they are so able to say these ridiculous things
Speaker 2: and also create these horrific, horrific experiments or methods of
Speaker 2: control for the people at the top. They simply do
Speaker 2: not relate to us. I'm not singling Professor O'Neil for
Speaker 2: a special criticism on this. He is just one of
Speaker 2: many straws in the wind on lab grown meat, which
Speaker 2: has grown in prominence in the food Revolution narrative to
Speaker 2: the point of overtaking edible insects as the alternative protein
Speaker 2: du jore. So maybe we're not going to have to
Speaker 2: eat the bugs. We're just gonna eat the vat meat, which, honestly,
Speaker 2: I think I'd rather eat bugs, don't. I'm not sure
Speaker 2: I trust these people to culture me a nice steak
Speaker 2: at least with bugs. I know that they are kind
Speaker 2: of organic. I think I would rather eat the bugs.
Speaker 6: mRNA in these Vat meats.
Speaker 2: Yes, a very delectable strain of mRNA and heavy metals
Speaker 2: in this cultured meat. This Vat meat right here, truly
Speaker 2: delectable blend. Only last month, the media thrilled at the
Speaker 2: production of the world's largest cultivated chicken nugget. The world's
Speaker 2: largest cultivated chicken nugget, folks, this is where we are
Speaker 2: as a people. The reditification of the average person has
Speaker 2: been such a disaster for America. These people, Oh my gosh, guys,
Speaker 2: the chicken nuggies, the chicken nugg they made, the world's
Speaker 2: largest lab grown chicken nuggy, were really on the I
Speaker 2: cannot stand it. It is truly just another sign of
Speaker 2: the times, which incidentally looks exactly as appetizing as you'd expect. Yeah,
Speaker 2: look at that delectable Uh it looks like somebody skinned
Speaker 2: to marshmallow and made it slimy. I don't even it is.
Speaker 6: Yeah, you don't see that and think chicken nugget. It's
Speaker 6: a white blob.
Speaker 2: At best. It reminds me of tripe, kind of but
Speaker 2: grosser and when you're a grosser than tripe, you have
Speaker 2: truly lost the plot. Do these has this guy ever
Speaker 2: actually eaten food? Is my question? What does this man
Speaker 2: live off of that he can sow joyously sound these bells.
Speaker 2: The Open University tells us that lab grown meat will
Speaker 2: drive forward medical research. Oh goodie. I can't wait for
Speaker 2: them to culture me some new lungs or something. I'm
Speaker 2: sure that won't result in horrors beyond human comprehension. My
Speaker 2: dad talked about the body ooids, how they were working
Speaker 2: on culturing just brainless human bodies to take organs from,
Speaker 2: and that's a I assuming that's the sort of thing
Speaker 2: they're referencing where they're going to make leaps forward in
Speaker 2: that sort of thing by growing us steaks, which, as
Speaker 2: I said, that is a horror. Just growing human bodies
Speaker 2: for body parts and claiming that they are brainless and
Speaker 2: as such they have you know, they have no rights
Speaker 2: or anything of that nature, so there's no ethical quandary
Speaker 2: here and growing a human body simply to harvest the organs.
Speaker 2: Israel is already selling cultivated steaks, and other cultivated meat
Speaker 2: producers already have products under review in New Zealand Australia,
Speaker 2: the US, the EU, Singapore, Hong Kong and South Korea,
Speaker 2: AH Israel. Another thing that they are doing that is
Speaker 2: part of the problem. It is already available in the
Speaker 2: UK as pet food, where the I would not feed
Speaker 2: this to my dog. Let's be clear, I would not
Speaker 2: feed my dog a cultured steak if if they're one
Speaker 2: of our dogs is getting up in years, he is
Speaker 2: nearly he's over sixteen, he's a docs and if his
Speaker 2: time comes and he's going to get some delicious food
Speaker 2: as his last meal, he's getting a real steak, or
Speaker 2: at least part of one. He doesn't have many teeth
Speaker 2: left at all. So I would not feed this cultured
Speaker 2: garbage to my dog, even as a last meal. This
Speaker 2: is something that I would not trust. The UK is
Speaker 2: expected to approve it for human consumption within two years,
Speaker 2: with grants hinted out to companies to fast track the process.
Speaker 2: But why why would the Great reset want to erase
Speaker 2: the need for farming. This is where we're getting into
Speaker 2: the meat of the article. Folks. It's not like farming
Speaker 2: and farmers exist independently of the global exploitation machine. A
Speaker 2: huge percentage of meat producing farmers are owned by massive
Speaker 2: international conglomerates, growing meat as quickly as possible to squeeze
Speaker 2: through nugget shaped molds for a million fast food chains.
Speaker 2: That's right, Many of these large farms are simply more
Speaker 2: international global corporations, or they want to murder this cash
Speaker 2: cow one very much intended. If the profited answers of
Speaker 2: ethics and climate change aren't already ringing hollow to you,
Speaker 2: then you're not paying attention. The only answer that seems
Speaker 2: to satisfy is control, one more filtration layer between you
Speaker 2: and independence. Yes, as I said, this is about removing
Speaker 2: your ability to feed yourself. They need you fully dependent
Speaker 2: on the system. They can't have you even able to
Speaker 2: potentially be able to raise food for yourself. After all,
Speaker 2: anyone can raise their own chickens, pigs, or cows. It's
Speaker 2: just a matter of space. Even if you're lacking the
Speaker 2: resources to become self sufficient. Small local farms are an
Speaker 2: option that avoids big farmer. I like that term big farmer.
Speaker 2: It implies there is just one very large farmer that
Speaker 2: they all have to be beholden to.
Speaker 7: Big farmer.
Speaker 2: But if lab grown meat replaces natural meat, that makes
Speaker 2: corporations your only source for meat at all. It means
Speaker 2: the chemical content nutritional value can be controlled. It makes
Speaker 2: scarcity easy to engineer as well. Exactly it is about scarcity.
Speaker 2: It is about sinking their hooks deeper and deeper into
Speaker 2: you and making sure that you have no way around them,
Speaker 2: that you have to come to them in hand and
Speaker 2: ask them for anything and everything that you could think of.
Speaker 7: Now, I want to.
Speaker 2: Talk a little bit about AI. There was an article
Speaker 2: on this was on the BBC and it's Elton John
Speaker 2: Brand's government losers over AI copyright plans, and there was
Speaker 2: a case recently where they decided that the AI cannot
Speaker 2: hold copyright, so songs generated by AI are not up
Speaker 2: for copyright, which is both good and bad in some ways. Personally,
Speaker 2: I think it's good in the sense that you can
Speaker 2: very very quickly generate an innumerable number of songs, and
Speaker 2: with the massive number of people generating them, it is
Speaker 2: possible to very very rapidly.
Speaker 7: Burn through.
Speaker 2: A massive, massive number of potential songs that could have
Speaker 2: been written by other people, or songs that are so
Speaker 2: similar to bands that it limits their ability to create
Speaker 2: new music. However, it does mean that if you do
Speaker 2: create something that is massively popular. I use the term
Speaker 2: create very loosely here, but if you do have the
Speaker 2: AI create something that is popular, you really cannot be
Speaker 2: paid for it. It is simply you know, anyone else
Speaker 2: can take it and use it, which you know fair enough.
Speaker 2: Sir elten John described the government as absolute losers and
Speaker 2: said he feels incredibly betrayed our plans to accept technology
Speaker 2: firms from copyright laws. Speaking exclusively to Sunday with Laura Kunsberg,
Speaker 2: he said ministers go ahead with plans to allow AI
Speaker 2: firms to use artists content without paying, they would be
Speaker 2: committing theft thievery on a high scale.
Speaker 7: Yeah, they are.
Speaker 2: It is another issue. They are letting these companies off
Speaker 2: the hook for just stealing the content. These musicians have
Speaker 2: worked hard to create this article. I had it on
Speaker 2: Thursday Friday, but it's a fairly timeless. The AI problem
Speaker 2: is not going away, folks. The genie is out of
Speaker 2: the bottle. The time to litigate whether we wanted AI
Speaker 2: was before it happened. Now we are simply left to
Speaker 2: deal with the consequences and decide how far and what
Speaker 2: the scope of it is going to be. The Ted
Speaker 2: Kaczynski idea of returning to a luddite society just does
Speaker 2: not work. The as I said, you cannot put the
Speaker 2: genie back in the bottle. Once this stuff is out,
Speaker 2: it is out for good, and trying to remove it
Speaker 2: becomes all but impossible. Dug seven. What to David Perry
Speaker 2: labgun meat as tumor meat? Yes, I believe that was
Speaker 2: the terminology that my dad employed. Tumor meat. Which doesn't
Speaker 2: that sound delectable? Doesn't that sound delicious? Wouldn't you want
Speaker 2: to go to your local insert whatever steakhouse is near
Speaker 2: you and get a nice big tumor Rabbi or New
Speaker 2: York strip that sounds.
Speaker 6: Delicious, tumor fresh from the vat.
Speaker 2: You know what, maybe in future they'll take you back
Speaker 2: to the vat and you can pick out your blob
Speaker 2: that they'll cook up for you. Doesn't that sound fun?
Speaker 1: Ooh?
Speaker 2: Yes, that blob looks particularly succulent. Give that blob to me,
Speaker 2: pull it right out of the vat. The real octo
Speaker 2: spook tumor meat is probably not only descriptive but accurate. Yes,
Speaker 2: I would agree. Just this undulating mass of flesh that
Speaker 2: they are forcing to grow via nutrient injection, I don't know,
Speaker 2: what else you would call that besides tumor. This week
Speaker 2: the government directive proposals for from the House of Lords
Speaker 2: to force AI companies to disclose what material they were
Speaker 2: using to develop their programs. The government wants these AIS.
Speaker 2: They have no interest in the companies having shackles put
Speaker 2: on them for any reason whatsoever. The further they can
Speaker 2: push this, the more control it will inevitably give them.
Speaker 2: This will obviously be intertwined with government at some point,
Speaker 2: probably already as we saw the FDA moving towards an
Speaker 2: AI that will be used to approve or disapprove of drugs.
Speaker 2: Coila Moos three sixty. Yes, it's tumor meat because answer
Speaker 2: cells are the only cells fast enough to replicate a
Speaker 2: chicken nugget. Yeah, they have to replicate rapidly. Rapid replication
Speaker 2: is necessary for food production, so tumor meat. It is generative.
Speaker 2: AI programs mine or learned from vast amounts of data
Speaker 2: like text, images, or music online to generate new content
Speaker 2: which feels like it has been made by a human.
Speaker 2: Sarlton John said. The danger is that for young artists,
Speaker 2: they haven't got the resources to fight big tech firms.
Speaker 2: It's criminal and that I feel incredibly betrayed.
Speaker 1: He had it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, some of these more established artists may be
Speaker 2: able to get them to back down. Doubtful in my opinion.
Speaker 2: The if you're a new band, when you release a
Speaker 2: bunch of stuff, there is nothing to stop these big
Speaker 2: tech firms from just swooping in and scraping all of
Speaker 2: your data into their machine and making sure that they
Speaker 2: can replicate your sound almost you know, instantly. There are
Speaker 2: I mean what I know of at least four different
Speaker 2: AI programs that generate music. And you know, this sort
Speaker 2: of thing is only is only moving further forward. You are,
Speaker 2: as I said, not going to put the genie back
Speaker 2: in the bottle. There's simply going to be more of them,
Speaker 2: and then it will consolidate. Starts out as a proliferation,
Speaker 2: then it happens as a consolidation. On Monday, the House
Speaker 2: of Lords voted by a one to forty seve majority
Speaker 2: to amend the Data Use and Access Bill to add
Speaker 2: transparency to requirements, which aim to ensure copyright holders have
Speaker 2: to give permission for their work to be used. But
Speaker 2: on Wednesday, MPs in the House of Commons voted to
Speaker 2: reject this change, meaning the Buill will continue to go
Speaker 2: back and forth between the two houses until they reach
Speaker 2: an agreement on it. And I think for me personally,
Speaker 2: the real danger with these ais is that it will
Speaker 2: steal any sort of motivation people have to actually create
Speaker 2: things on their own. I'm not musically inclined at all,
Speaker 2: but there's a great probability that there are many younger
Speaker 2: people out there that are musically inclined that will see
Speaker 2: an ai generate music and just think, oh, well, I'll
Speaker 2: do that. Instead, they will not engage with an actual instrument,
Speaker 2: they will not learn how to play, they will rob
Speaker 2: themselves of that experience.
Speaker 6: They will.
Speaker 2: Not experience that joy for themselves. And this is coming
Speaker 2: from someone who wishes that I was musically inclined. It
Speaker 2: would be great if I was, but I simply do
Speaker 2: not have that talent. And to see this moving along
Speaker 2: in such a way where many many people are going
Speaker 2: to lose that We're going to lose so many potentially
Speaker 2: great musicians over the years to this laziness and false
Speaker 2: sense of creation. But Elton John is speaking up about it.
Speaker 2: He's not happy. And this is on Reuters. It's another
Speaker 2: story about ai US Appeals Court rejects copyright for AI
Speaker 2: generated art lacking human creator. March eighteenth. Federal Appeals Court
Speaker 2: in Washington, DC on Tuesday affirm that a work of
Speaker 2: art generated by artificial artificial intelligence without human input cannot
Speaker 2: be copyright copyrighted under US law. The US Court of
Speaker 2: Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit agreed with the US
Speaker 2: Copyright Office that an image created by Stephen Dowler's AI
Speaker 2: system Dabis Dabas Davis, was not entitled to copyright protection
Speaker 2: and that only works with human authors can be copyrighted.
Speaker 2: Tuesday's decision marks the latest attempt by US officials to
Speaker 2: grapple with the copyright implications of the fast growing, generative
Speaker 2: AI industry. The Copyright Office has separately rejected artist bids
Speaker 2: for copyright generated by the AI system. Mid Journeys argued
Speaker 2: they were entitled to copyrights for images they created with
Speaker 2: AI assistance. Had a computer crash here, folks, But yes,
Speaker 2: you are not entitled to copyright these images.
Speaker 1: They are.
Speaker 2: Simply generated. And while I wait for my computer to reboot,
Speaker 2: I think it might actually be a good time to
Speaker 2: go to a break. We've talked a little bit about AI.
Speaker 2: We've seen the issues with it, and those are just
Speaker 2: with the more social aspects of it. There's many many
Speaker 2: more diabolical uses that the government will put it to
Speaker 2: when it comes to sifting through massive, massive amounts of
Speaker 2: data and curating all the information about you, and it
Speaker 2: is only going to get more terrifying as the AI
Speaker 2: is get more advanced. We have a comment from KWD
Speaker 2: sixty eight. AI will be critical for implementing one world
Speaker 2: government and currency. Yes, it will be a massive part
Speaker 2: part of their plan for sure, but as I said.
Speaker 6: For mass surveillance on the scales that they need, because
Speaker 6: they aren't going to have enough people to You can't
Speaker 6: have everyone having their own FBI agent watching everything they do,
Speaker 6: but everyone can have their own AI agent watching everything
Speaker 6: they do exactly.
Speaker 2: They simply do not have the manpower or the personnel
Speaker 2: required to monitor everyone at all times. But if you
Speaker 2: delegate that task to an AI, then it becomes much
Speaker 2: more manageable. You give THEAI some loose parameters on what
Speaker 2: to look out for, and if someone does anything that
Speaker 2: could be interpreted within those parameters, it will kick it
Speaker 2: up to someone, or maybe it'll simply just launch a
Speaker 2: drone swarm directly at your house. The possibilities are endless
Speaker 2: and terrifying. I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords
Speaker 2: with open arms. That is a joke, folks, I've heard
Speaker 2: it pointed out.
Speaker 6: But as power becomes more democratized with guns, that led
Speaker 6: to democracy in politics. And this is the opposite of that.
Speaker 6: This is power being centralized in the hands of a few.
Speaker 6: If you know, a few people can have swarms of
Speaker 6: AI drones that don't require human operators, and it's one
Speaker 6: person that can send out an entire army. That's going
Speaker 6: to be reflected in politics eventually.
Speaker 2: Yes, And of course creating a creating a drone swarm
Speaker 2: or a drone bomb army requires a certain level of.
Speaker 4: War.
Speaker 2: Is the province of the wealthy. It has always been
Speaker 2: that way, it'd always be that way. Creating a robot
Speaker 2: army is not going to be cheap either. So we
Speaker 2: will take a quick break and we will be right back. Folks,
Speaker 2: stay with us.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Welcome back, folks. We just had an express delivery from
Speaker 2: my mom. Wanted to shout out some Subscribe Star people.
Speaker 2: They were very very kind, had some very kind words.
Speaker 2: Plata David Karen Travis and Whistler. Whistler and daughter were
Speaker 2: praying for David swift recovery. Please accept a small contribution
Speaker 2: towards medical expenses. Well, that is not small, that is
Speaker 2: very generous. And a user number which I won't read
Speaker 2: out just in get well soon that is also incredibly generous.
Speaker 2: Thank you, Kevin h. I restarted my twenty dollars a
Speaker 2: month subscription. I didn't realize it wasn't taking out from
Speaker 2: the cards, So here is a little bit more to
Speaker 2: make up for that lost time. Thank you so much
Speaker 2: for your show. Sometimes I feel like only you and
Speaker 2: I get it. Of course a lot of your guests
Speaker 2: also get it. But in my life, my peers, my family,
Speaker 2: they are all drinking the kool ai.
Speaker 7: Thank you.
Speaker 2: Imagine how good the wine that Jesus made was. Yes,
Speaker 2: I bet it was delicious and I don't even like wine.
Speaker 2: But thank you. Thank you all so much for the support.
Speaker 2: It has been truly amazing and a blessing to see
Speaker 2: the outpouring of it, whether it's monetary or the prayers
Speaker 2: and all the kind words people have sent regarding our father.
Speaker 2: It has been such a blessing to us. Thank you
Speaker 2: all so much for the support. I cannot thank you enough.
Speaker 2: And we've got some comments here as well. The real
Speaker 2: octo spook tumor, meat and bugs. Make sure to have
Speaker 2: balanced meals. Yes, you can't focus too much on one
Speaker 2: or the other. You got to have a nice balanced diet.
Speaker 2: You gotta get your tumor here, got to eat your
Speaker 2: insect here. You know, maybe a little bit of cricket paced,
Speaker 2: a little bit of tumor can't go wrong. Solo Cat
Speaker 2: nineteen eighty Tumor tenders and choice cuts of cancer.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 2: You want to get in early to make sure you
Speaker 2: get the prime cancer cuts. You don't want to be
Speaker 2: stuck with the second rate cancer cuts. Ge talent. I'm
Speaker 2: craving a bacteria burger. Delicious, delicious bacteria burger. What the
Speaker 2: stomach craves. Truly, we live in strange, strange times, and
Speaker 2: I I am very wary of the future. Now let's
Speaker 2: move along Montana And this is from Reclaim the Net
Speaker 2: by Ken Macon. Montana becomes the first state to ban
Speaker 2: warrantless data purchases by law enforcement. If your Montana has
Speaker 2: taken a decisive leap where others have faltered, becoming the
Speaker 2: first date in the US two officially outlaw a widespread
Speaker 2: government surveillance tactic buying up private data without a warrant.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 2: They can just go to these companies and buy it
Speaker 2: from them. They don't have to get your permission. They
Speaker 2: just simply throw a wad of cash at the companies
Speaker 2: and they will pass it all along because that's in
Speaker 2: their agreement. They are free to sell your data to
Speaker 2: the highest bidder, and no one can bid higher than
Speaker 2: the government.
Speaker 6: With the passage of that's why you know LifeLock was
Speaker 6: ended when Facebook began, because these things were set up
Speaker 6: with funding from let's CIA, through co Intel or ink
Speaker 6: you tell? Can you tell that you know allowed them
Speaker 6: to create these in order to wind up giving the
Speaker 6: information to the government. It's all just plausible deniability from
Speaker 6: the government exactly.
Speaker 2: It's they love their deniability. Niburu twenty twenty nine. Timor
Speaker 2: meat redefines the statement you are what you eat.
Speaker 7: That's right.
Speaker 2: A nice cancer blob for the blobs they want to
Speaker 2: turn into cancer. With the passage of Senate Bill two
Speaker 2: eighty two SB twoity two, lawmakers have directly confronted what
Speaker 2: has become a backdoor into people's lives. Commercial data brokers
Speaker 2: selling sensitive digital information to law enforcement agencies, sidestepping the
Speaker 2: need for judicial authorization.
Speaker 6: That's right.
Speaker 2: They don't have to go to these judges and get
Speaker 2: a warrant anymore. They just simply purchase it. And I
Speaker 2: mean it's not like judges have for a long time
Speaker 2: basically just rubber stamped a lot of things. When the
Speaker 2: federal government comes knocking, Oh you want this, okay, sure,
Speaker 2: knowing full well that there are very rarely any repercussions.
Speaker 2: Even when they violate the law, they get a slap
Speaker 2: on the wrist if that. This so called data broker
Speaker 2: loophole has allowed government agencies across the country to acquire
Speaker 2: personal details they'd otherwise need a warrant to access. Instead
Speaker 2: of presenting probable cause to a judge, agencies could simply
Speaker 2: purchase location histories and other metadata from third party brokers
Speaker 2: who gather it from mobile apps. These apps often track
Speaker 2: users movements down to the minute, creating comprehensive logs of
Speaker 2: their daily routines. Until now, the information was effectively up
Speaker 2: for grabs and no warrant has been required mota's new law,
Speaker 2: but it's a clear end of that practice. Under SB
Speaker 2: two eighty two. State and local government entities are now
Speaker 2: barred from purchasing several categories of digital data, including but
Speaker 2: not limited to, electronic communications and their contents to a location, data,
Speaker 2: financial transaction records, pseudonymous identifiers, and other forms of sensitive
Speaker 2: personal information such as religious beliefs, health status, and biometric details. Importantly,
Speaker 2: the legislation doesn't eliminate access altogether. It restricts how that
Speaker 2: access is obtained. Law enforcement montanumous now secar a judge's
Speaker 2: approval via a search warrant or meet other legal standards
Speaker 2: such as investigative subpoenas. Consent from the device's owner is
Speaker 2: also still a permissible route, so there will just have
Speaker 2: to go to a judge and get them to rubber
Speaker 2: stand bit, which I think they will still be able
Speaker 2: to do. I don't think that's going to change that
Speaker 2: very much.
Speaker 6: Yeah, this bill is it strikes me as nonsense because
Speaker 6: you know, these companies are still going to be collecting
Speaker 6: this data and selling it to private entities, and you know,
Speaker 6: we are just going to take the law enforcements where
Speaker 6: that they aren't going to look at any of the
Speaker 6: publicly available private entities if they were serious about privacy,
Speaker 6: they would put some restrictions on these companies gathering and
Speaker 6: selling data on its users.
Speaker 2: Yeah, which we do not see at all. And a
Speaker 2: related note, this is from Car and Driver. DMVs can
Speaker 2: and do collect and sell your personal data.
Speaker 7: That's right.
Speaker 2: The government is not just in the business of buying
Speaker 2: your data, it's in the business of selling it. The
Speaker 2: information they're allowed to sell includes your data, birth and address.
Speaker 2: This is from the April twenty twenty issue of Car
Speaker 2: and Driver. If living an information age has taught us anything,
Speaker 2: it's that our personal information is not safe in the
Speaker 2: hands of private companies. It's somewhat more disconcerting to learn
Speaker 2: that our information is not safe in the hands of
Speaker 2: the government. You thought it was safe in the hands
Speaker 2: of the government at one point.
Speaker 7: Not to.
Speaker 2: Not to I don't know, not to deride this guy,
Speaker 2: but come on, where have you been privacy?
Speaker 6: You just can't have a driver's license. It's that simple,
Speaker 6: you know, read the terms and conditions of your driver's
Speaker 6: license there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's somewhat more disconcerning to learn that information not
Speaker 2: safe in the hands of the government either. An investigation
Speaker 2: by Vice found that in several states, the Department of
Speaker 2: motor Vehicles. DMV supplements its income by selling drivers personal information,
Speaker 2: including their name, states of birth, addresses, and the cars
Speaker 2: they own, to third parties. Florida's Motor Vehicle Licensing Department
Speaker 2: made seventy seven million that way in twenty seventeen. In
Speaker 2: California's DMV made fifty two million. And they're not the
Speaker 2: only ones. DMVs across the country, including those in Delaware, Indiana,
Speaker 2: New Jersey, Roade Island, Vermont, in Wisconsin, among others, are
Speaker 2: profiting too.
Speaker 7: That's right.
Speaker 2: The government doesn't just buy, it sells. Whatever they can
Speaker 2: do with your data, they will do it. These people
Speaker 2: have no respect for your privacy. They do not care.
Speaker 2: And that is simply something I wanted to point out.
Speaker 2: They are buying and selling your data. Your privacy is
Speaker 2: just a game to them. They if you are on
Speaker 2: the internet, the privacy is an illusion. And this is
Speaker 2: an article that I saw last week, didn't get a
Speaker 2: chance to cover, but I think it's still worth covering.
Speaker 2: Trump moves to rescind appliance efficiency standards. This is about
Speaker 2: the energy Star efficiency standards that have been on everything
Speaker 2: for as long as I can remember. Basically, President Donald
Speaker 2: Trump on May ninths moved to rescind appliants energy efficiency standards,
Speaker 2: calling them unnecessary radical green agenda policies. And again I
Speaker 2: agree with him here. I agree with him on this.
Speaker 2: It these these machines that have the Energy Star on them,
Speaker 2: they are forced to comply with these ridiculous standards, and
Speaker 2: these ridiculous the ridiculous ways they go about doing it
Speaker 2: makes these machines whatever they are harder to maintain and
Speaker 2: break down. I already covered the story. How in the world, Well,
Speaker 2: my goodness, time flies and I am losing my mind. Well,
Speaker 2: I don't believe I covered this one. This is something
Speaker 2: I saw as well. Meta to add facial recognition to
Speaker 2: glasses despite privacy concerns. That's right. If you wear these ridiculous,
Speaker 2: goofy awful looking Mark Zuckerberg metaglasses, you can be scanning
Speaker 2: the faces of everyone you come across in real time.
Speaker 2: Isn't that lovely? You too, can be a cog in
Speaker 2: the machine of the surveillance state, Isn't that wonderful?
Speaker 6: Don't worry? At least if you're in Montana, they have
Speaker 6: to ask permission before the government access is the data
Speaker 6: of every person that you happen to walk by while
Speaker 6: wearing these goody goody.
Speaker 2: Meta prepares to integrate facial recognition tech into its ray
Speaker 2: band smart glasses after previously downplaying criticisms I'm sure they did.
Speaker 2: For or four Media on Wednesday, the Information reported that
Speaker 2: Meta is working on facial recognition for the company's ray
Speaker 2: banned glasses. This sort of technology, combining facial recognition with
Speaker 2: the camera feed, is some that big tech, including Meta,
Speaker 2: has been able to has been able to technically pull off,
Speaker 2: it has previously decided to not release. There are serious
Speaker 2: inherent risks with the idea of anyone being able to
Speaker 2: instantly know the real identity of anyone who just happens
Speaker 2: to walk past their camera feed, be that in a
Speaker 2: pair of glasses or other sort of cameras. Yes, this
Speaker 2: is a privacy nightmare. If you think the UK is
Speaker 2: bad because the sheer number of cameras they have surveilling
Speaker 2: you at any point, imagine once a significant portion of
Speaker 2: the population is warring cameras that are mobile and continually
Speaker 2: scanning for things. You know, when the camera is locked
Speaker 2: in place. There are things you can do about it.
Speaker 2: You can either avoid that area, or you can sabotage it.
Speaker 2: Not that we advocate for that. I would never advocate
Speaker 2: for damaging government property. Don't do it, folks, But theoretically
Speaker 2: you could sabotage it, as we've seen people in the
Speaker 2: UK do over and over again with different cameras. They
Speaker 2: cut them down, they block them out, but when it
Speaker 2: is attached to someone else's face, that becomes a much
Speaker 2: more dubious prospect. And again, they will be mobile, They
Speaker 2: will be all over the place. They will be scanning
Speaker 2: orders of magnitude more people. Even if they are you know,
Speaker 2: even if they are less in number than the stationary cameras,
Speaker 2: the fact that they're able to move around and go
Speaker 2: into different locations and be inside buildings will give them
Speaker 2: access to more people than ever before. It is truly
Speaker 2: scary the direction we're going. The move is an obvious
Speaker 2: about face for meta. Really, I don't think so. I mean,
Speaker 2: perhaps in lip service, but this has always been the trend.
Speaker 2: Facebook has always been about stealing your data and monitoring you.
Speaker 2: I mean, as Lance pointed out, it literally went away.
Speaker 7: It literally.
Speaker 2: CIA canceled its Lifelog project the second the second that
Speaker 2: Facebook became a thing because they realized, oh wait, we
Speaker 2: can just get people to give us their data for free.
Speaker 2: We don't have to We don't have to sit here
Speaker 2: and do it ourselves. They'll just give it to us.
Speaker 2: The move is an obvious about face from Meta. It's
Speaker 2: also interest interesting to me because metas pr chewed my
Speaker 2: ass off when I dared to report in October that
Speaker 2: a pair of students took Meta's ray band glasses and
Speaker 2: combined them with the OFFICELLF facial recognition technology. A tool
Speaker 2: which is students called i x ray captured a person's face,
Speaker 2: ran it through an easy access facial recognition service called
Speaker 2: primeiz Pemis. Primis whatever these people are whatever then went
Speaker 2: a step further and pulled up information about the subject
Speaker 2: from across the web, including their home address and phone number.
Speaker 2: When I contacted metaphor comment for that story, Dave Arnold,
Speaker 2: a spokesperson for the company, said an email had had
Speaker 2: a question for me that pemi's facial recognition could be
Speaker 2: used with any camera.
Speaker 7: Correct.
Speaker 2: In other words, this isn't something that is only possible
Speaker 2: because of Meta ray bands. If so, I think it's
Speaker 2: important point to note. In the piece, he wrote, Sure, Yeah,
Speaker 2: you can do it with any camera. The software can
Speaker 2: interface with. However, it is more nefarious and scarier when
Speaker 2: it is something someone is wearing on their face at
Speaker 2: all times and can be used constantly at any moment forever.
Speaker 2: This is true, but entirely missed the point of why
Speaker 2: the students created the tool with metas ray bang glasses.
Speaker 2: They said themselves in a demonstration video, they identified dozens
Speaker 2: of people without their knowledge do that by wearing a
Speaker 2: pair of glasses that look like any other. Metas ray
Speaker 2: bands do have a light that turns on when our succording.
Speaker 2: But according to the news report, Meta is questioning whether
Speaker 2: new versions of its glasses need this. That's right, they're
Speaker 2: going to take away the one indicator that lets you
Speaker 2: know you are being surveilled.
Speaker 1: However, at a.
Speaker 6: Comment about the Montana law, saying that it would be
Speaker 6: a good strategy against the flock camera system that's multiplying
Speaker 6: all over the country. The reason AT and T was
Speaker 6: doing this is because the Supreme Court said they could
Speaker 6: sell private information, and this is a good step in
Speaker 6: the right direction for stopping that cancer of surveillance at
Speaker 6: the state level. Of course, it is still available, you know,
Speaker 6: to private companies. But we'll see how this turns out it.
Speaker 6: It's a good step in the right direction.
Speaker 2: Yes, we don't want to integrate one lawmakers actually do
Speaker 2: as you said, take a step in the right direction.
Speaker 2: But it's important not to rest on your laurels and
Speaker 2: think that, oh, Montana is now a privacy sanctuary. There's
Speaker 2: still ways around it. You still have to keep fighting.
Speaker 2: It is not enough, but it is a good start,
Speaker 2: I replied to Arnold's spelling is out a bit. Yes,
Speaker 2: it could theoretically work with other cameras. That being said,
Speaker 2: they didn't stick a GoPro onto their body, which would
Speaker 2: undermine the surreptitious nature of it. They use smart glasses,
Speaker 2: which meta makes That's right. The form factor makes it scarier.
Speaker 2: It makes it harder to detect. It means that people
Speaker 2: are less likely to know. And I can only imagine
Speaker 2: that this will be horrifying in the future as people
Speaker 2: are continually being scanned. Your metaglasses will be continually checking
Speaker 2: for people that are on the government's no no list,
Speaker 2: so they can come swoop them up and move them away,
Speaker 2: rendition them to some unknown location. Audi mrr good for Montana.
Speaker 2: A last that won't stop. Cops are violating the Fourth Amendment.
Speaker 2: Their predatory criminals. Yes, many, many cops have. They simply
Speaker 2: became cops because they like the power, and they don't
Speaker 2: care about your rights and have no interest in protecting
Speaker 2: them and will violate them however they see fit. The
Speaker 2: police union gives them a lot of protection. They are
Speaker 2: not forced to care about your rights in the slightest.
Speaker 2: They can do as they want, knowing that they have
Speaker 2: a large legal team to back them up.
Speaker 3: And you do not.
Speaker 2: Don't frag me, bro. DARPA creates the tech, CIA implements
Speaker 2: the tech via government and corporations. That's right they do. Indeed,
Speaker 2: it is all one big interconnected spy network. Tunnel Lord
Speaker 2: one three three seven. How exactly did David hurt his ribs?
Speaker 2: I don't think you've covered that. So, as we said before,
Speaker 2: our dad David had two small strokes, and during the
Speaker 2: first one he happened to be in his chair and
Speaker 2: he fell over out of it, and so that was
Speaker 2: how he hurt his ribs. He fell onto them. But yes,
Speaker 2: that's how that happened. Please keep him in your prayers.
Speaker 2: We are so thankful that God has given him more
Speaker 2: time with us. We cannot thank you enough for all
Speaker 2: the prayers you've already sent up for healing. We just
Speaker 2: asked that you continue to do that. We pray for many,
Speaker 2: many more years with our father, our son, my son,
Speaker 2: and my wife's son loves his Pappy, loves spending time
Speaker 2: with him. His face lights up basically every time he
Speaker 2: sees him. So we just want to make sure that
Speaker 2: he has as much time as possible with him. And
Speaker 2: I think maybe we'll get into some of the LGBT
Speaker 2: insanity for a bit. This is an article out of Brazil,
Speaker 2: but it's on the Free Thought Project. No, it's on
Speaker 2: the New American My apologies. Brazilian women investigated for transphobia
Speaker 2: for calling Lucy the skeleton a female. That's right, you
Speaker 2: can miss gender skeletons now, so be sure around Halloween
Speaker 2: time to watch your p's and q's, or something really
Speaker 2: spooky might happen to you. You might get a visit
Speaker 2: from the government if the trainees in Brazil get their way.
Speaker 2: No more will Boss and Nova fans hear the girl
Speaker 2: from Ipanema. Oh yeah, that's right, that's got to go.
Speaker 2: That's problematic. Can't play that anymore. For in the largest
Speaker 2: country in South America, girls are no more nor women
Speaker 2: nor females to use scientific lingo, which is most appropriate
Speaker 2: in the case of a woman who has land in
Speaker 2: hot water. For noting that Lucy the incomplete I'm not
Speaker 2: going to try to pronounce that skeleton found in Ethiopia
Speaker 2: nineteen seventy four was indeed a female. The cops are
Speaker 2: investigating Karen Mizuno Reducks has reported for observing the obvious
Speaker 2: about Lucy in a social media post. Zino thus committed
Speaker 2: the crime of transphobia. Is there any more heinous crime
Speaker 2: than that not bowing and scraping to these mentally ill
Speaker 2: people who want to destroy children? A Brazilian woman is
Speaker 2: under police investigation for criminal transphobia after commenting on social
Speaker 2: media that archaeologists are able to determine a deceased person
Speaker 2: sex from their bones. If charged, Karen Bzzuno faces up
Speaker 2: to three years in prison. Science is no More. In April,
Speaker 2: when she spoke at a woman's rights protest in Rio
Speaker 2: de Janeiro, reduct support of Missuo, disclosed that criminal charges
Speaker 2: might be forthcoming. Her crime. She ridiculed a transactivist who
Speaker 2: claim that archaeologists are transphobic. Mazuno explained that her ordeal
Speaker 2: began after an article was circulated about Lucy, a well
Speaker 2: known fossil of a female. They say human ancestor. I
Speaker 2: don't believe that, and we'll get into that after this,
Speaker 2: so stay tuned for that, which dates back approximately three
Speaker 2: point two million years. Don't believe that either. Reducts reported.
Speaker 2: The situation was there was an article going around about
Speaker 2: the bones belonging to the fossil of Lucy and how
Speaker 2: the archaeologists found out that it was female, that she
Speaker 2: was a woman. But again I don't buy into that.
Speaker 2: So it was it was a female because of the
Speaker 2: pelvic bone structure. A Zuno said. Transactivists were saying that
Speaker 2: attesting that Lucy was a female because of her female
Speaker 2: pelvic bone was transphobia. In other words, they said she
Speaker 2: could be a trans man.
Speaker 1: I really think it.
Speaker 2: Could they really think that someone who lived, she says,
Speaker 2: three million years ago had a gender identity. It's an
Speaker 2: unreasonable argument. Yes, the whole gender identity thing is a
Speaker 2: whole cloth creation over the last well multiple decades, but
Speaker 2: it is a very very recent invention and has only
Speaker 2: really hit the public consciousness in the last decade. It
Speaker 2: has a rapidly spreading mental illness, badness yes, but there
Speaker 2: you have it anyway, Mizuno screenshot the tweet which said this,
Speaker 2: This tweet reminds me of something I never see people
Speaker 2: talking about. Archaeologists are indeed transphobic. That's so called lucy
Speaker 2: for example? Are they inferring that she was a woman
Speaker 2: based on the bones alone? Does that mean that if
Speaker 2: I die in five hundred or five thousand years, someone
Speaker 2: might disrespect my gender because of that? What a horrifying
Speaker 2: idea that someone might dig up your bones and disrespect
Speaker 2: your gender. That's that's disgusting. I would never disrespect your
Speaker 2: gender like that. I'll do it while you're alive. Mizuno's
Speaker 2: big crime was adding commentary to the ridiculous tweet. The
Speaker 2: only reason I won't do it then is because I'll
Speaker 2: be dead long before five hundred years has passed. With
Speaker 2: each passing day, human extinction ceases to become a fear
Speaker 2: and become something to hope for, she equipped. Missino told
Speaker 2: Reducs that she said nothing about trans There was no
Speaker 2: hateful speech. I only suggested that the question the post
Speaker 2: ridiculous and clamored for the extinction of the planet.
Speaker 1: No matter.
Speaker 2: Two cops showed up at her home to say they
Speaker 2: were investigating the comments. Reducts continued. I was notified on
Speaker 2: November nineteenth, twenty four, she told the website. The police
Speaker 2: came to my house, but I wasn't at home. They
Speaker 2: told my mother if I didn't go to the police
Speaker 2: station on the scheduled date, they would arrest me, she said.
Speaker 2: In other words, I could literally be arrested for agreeing
Speaker 2: with archaeologists that a three million year old fossil which
Speaker 2: had a female pelvis had been a woman. Again, don't
Speaker 2: buy into the three million year old thing, but that's
Speaker 2: not the point of this article. This is just showcasing
Speaker 2: the insanity of these people that even stating an obvious
Speaker 2: fact that this this skeleton was female is now considered
Speaker 2: transphobic because who knows what this skeleton's gender identity was
Speaker 2: when it was alive.
Speaker 6: The irony of I assume a man pretending to be
Speaker 6: a woman, saying that people might dig up my bones
Speaker 6: and think that I was a man is just so rich.
Speaker 2: Yeah, these people are completely and utterly insane. They have
Speaker 2: fully given into their mental illnesses and what I believe
Speaker 2: is the demons that are assessing them.
Speaker 6: People might look at objective facts and come to a
Speaker 6: conclusion based on that and not consider my feelings in
Speaker 6: the matter, even though I'll be dead.
Speaker 1: Of course, Yeah, it is.
Speaker 2: It is an attack on reality itself. They have to
Speaker 2: force you to bend the knee. If you cannot accurately
Speaker 2: talk about what you see in front of you, it
Speaker 2: warps your ability to think about things as.
Speaker 1: As we can see.
Speaker 6: And the whole thing about the three million years that's
Speaker 6: you know, based on their carbon dating, which carbon dating
Speaker 6: is extremely inaccurate beyond a very short period of time
Speaker 6: because you don't know what conditions it's been kept in.
Speaker 6: If something is near fires or places where there's a
Speaker 6: lot of carbon, it would show as having much more.
Speaker 6: And there are a lot of things that can change
Speaker 6: the carbon level in something. But the bones. There are
Speaker 6: differences between male and female pelvic bones.
Speaker 2: Yes, the male and female skeleton is very, very different.
Speaker 2: They are set up to do different things better. The
Speaker 2: female skeleton, the pelvic region is very different as it
Speaker 2: helps them give birth. The male skeleton is denser, heavier, wider,
Speaker 2: all things that help in fights. They are set up
Speaker 2: to do different things. God has different purposes, as Reducs
Speaker 2: reported in twenty twenty two, sipas, I'm not yes, Sepus,
Speaker 2: we're going to go with that. Crime was calling a
Speaker 2: politician who pretended to be a woman what he is
Speaker 2: a man, and that man Erica quote unquote Hilton flew
Speaker 2: into a lipstick hurling rage when Sepa dared to tell
Speaker 2: the truth about him. Hilton was elected to sal Polo's
Speaker 2: municipal government in November twenty twenty, winning his seat by
Speaker 2: a landslide that gave him the title of the most
Speaker 2: voted for woman in Brazil. Reductions reported that's.
Speaker 7: Right, the.
Speaker 2: Highest voted woman in Brazil is a man. That just
Speaker 2: goes to show if you want to be you want
Speaker 2: to be a it takes a real man to be
Speaker 2: a woman.
Speaker 6: So I have a comment here from Dad. We've reached
Speaker 6: this point of absurdity because we rejected God, and that's
Speaker 6: the whole point of Lucy, which has been thoroughly debunked
Speaker 6: as a missing link, but they're still holding it up
Speaker 6: because it is a attack on God and objective reality.
Speaker 6: And if you accept that, then saying that, oh you
Speaker 6: can't say whether it was a trans man or whatever,
Speaker 6: it becomes logical.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the attack on reality didn't start with the trainees,
Speaker 2: but it may have reached its apotheosis here. Once you
Speaker 2: reject God has has my dad said, you have rejected
Speaker 2: reality and that allows for all these things to start
Speaker 2: to spiral out of control. At the time of his victory,
Speaker 2: Hilton was celebrated in international media as being a symbolic
Speaker 2: triumph for transgender people. Hilton was amongst the top ten
Speaker 2: most voted for candidates in all of Brazil and was
Speaker 2: touted as the only woman to make the list. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's a I don't even have any more comments on that.
Speaker 2: It is just it is just absurd that the most
Speaker 2: voted for woman is a man, and they don't see
Speaker 2: any irony in that, and they will look you dead
Speaker 2: in the eyes, say that with a straight face and
Speaker 2: expect you to believe it, despite the fact that this
Speaker 2: these women are most frequently built like some kind of linebacker.
Speaker 2: At the time, I didn't even know who this person was,
Speaker 2: she told readucks. I just saw a headline on Instagram page,
Speaker 2: I'll bring the most voted for women in Saal Polo
Speaker 2: is a trans woman and I shared a videos my
Speaker 2: father's saying I was disappointed here that the most voted
Speaker 2: for women in sau Polo later found out who was
Speaker 2: in the entire country was a man. And I believe
Speaker 2: that this woman is she is a feminist, so she
Speaker 2: is probably left leaning, left wing, but a lot of
Speaker 2: feminists have realized that the ideology has escaped its boundaries
Speaker 2: and gone too far. Not that I agree with really
Speaker 2: any form of feminism, but there is a more classic form,
Speaker 2: a more old guard form that at least rejects this
Speaker 2: hyper leftist narrative when it comes to what's happening to women.
Speaker 6: The tranes really, you know, take this to its logical conclusion,
Speaker 6: to the point of its absurdity, which is why you
Speaker 6: have you know, the LGBs versus the t's and the
Speaker 6: feminists versus the tranny's and all that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the trainees, as I said, are the apotheosis of
Speaker 2: this mental illness. It reaches its final climax here where
Speaker 2: we can see its pure ridiculousness in these men and
Speaker 2: women that demand to be called the opposite sex because
Speaker 2: again of the mental illnesses and demons that are writing them.
Speaker 2: Now this is we're going to jump from that story,
Speaker 2: and this is simply about the lucy skeleton. If you
Speaker 2: go to answers in Genesis dot Org. Again answers in
Speaker 2: Genesis and you search Lucy. They have a deep, deep
Speaker 2: repository of articles regarding it, and they go in depth
Speaker 2: on the numerous ways that the skeleton is a fraud
Speaker 2: when it comes to being an ancestor to humans, That
Speaker 2: the skeleton has been cobbled together over the years from
Speaker 2: numerous different things they found that they assume to be
Speaker 2: of the same species. So they continually find a little
Speaker 2: piece of a skeleton here, a little piece of a
Speaker 2: skeleton there, and say, well, these bones kind of look
Speaker 2: like they could be from the same animal, so we
Speaker 2: can cobble them together and get an idea of what
Speaker 2: it might look like. And of course sometimes I'm sure
Speaker 2: you can do that if it's found in the same
Speaker 2: general vicinity or has enough similarities, if you're able, I'm
Speaker 2: sure there are ways to look at them. But they
Speaker 2: have gone and done it with Lucy time and time
Speaker 2: again to make this claim that it is a human ancestor,
Speaker 2: and we can I personally don't buy into update into
Speaker 2: into that theory at all. It is simply a tree.
Speaker 2: It is simply a monkey in my opinion of some sort.
Speaker 2: But again, answers in Genesis dot Org. If you search Lucy,
Speaker 2: they have a deep repository of articles on why it
Speaker 2: isn't a human ancestor. And I'm just gonna I picked
Speaker 2: one and it was near the top and Lucy Makeover
Speaker 2: shouts a dangerously deceptive message about our supposed ancestors. And
Speaker 2: this is by doctor Elizabeth Mitchell, and it's from twenty thirteen.
Speaker 2: This is going back, you know, quite a few years now,
Speaker 2: because this is something that they have been pushing for many,
Speaker 2: many years. Abstract Ostralaophapithecus Astrolophipithecus. We're gonna go with that.
Speaker 2: A forensis newest reconstruction drags Lucy down to earth. Lucy
Speaker 2: the partial Australothopithecus a forenzas skeleton man. Don't make me
Speaker 2: say that again, please, Discovered in nineteen seventy four in
Speaker 2: Ethiopius had our Formation and long hailed as the evolutionary
Speaker 2: bipedal mother of humanity, just got a makeover. Hers felt
Speaker 2: new figure recently unveiled at the Cleveland Museum of Natural
Speaker 2: History as a trim waistline and arched feet. The purpose
Speaker 2: of the new reconstruction is to avoid giving the impression
Speaker 2: that humanity's a Forenza's ancestors retained chimp like adaptations for
Speaker 2: arboreal life. In this article you can see some pictures there.
Speaker 2: The Cleveland Museum's paleo paleoanthropologist Johannes Haile Selassie and artist
Speaker 2: John Girsch designed the reconstruction to reflect interpretations based on
Speaker 2: fossilized ribs and a footbone thought by some to belong
Speaker 2: to Lucy's Aforensis cousins. See, they take these skeletons that
Speaker 2: and cobble them together. This is a representation based on
Speaker 2: the fact that, oh, well, we think this might be related,
Speaker 2: and as such we're gonna update what we think the
Speaker 2: skeleton might have looked like.
Speaker 6: And these are bones from miles away, as though you
Speaker 6: know Lucy exploded.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's like miles away. And they date to even
Speaker 2: by their own methods, radically different timescales. Johanna been fossilized
Speaker 2: ribs and a footbone thought by some to belong to
Speaker 2: Lucy's afriends his cousins. Doctor Carrol Ward presented or talking
Speaker 2: titled Astrolothopithecus dang It below the Neck at below the
Speaker 2: Neck at the coinciding public symposium on the Trail of
Speaker 2: Lucy a collaborative exploration of Astrolothopithecus. Please stop so you
Speaker 2: know there's discuss the anatomical implications and evolutionary interpretations associated
Speaker 2: with these bones. New Lucy has a human like barrel
Speaker 2: shaped chest and trimmer wasteline instead of a chimp like
Speaker 2: cone shaped chest and potbelly. The case for this remarkable
Speaker 2: transformation is based on the curvature of some fossilized ribs
Speaker 2: belonging to Catanumu aka big Man. That just sounds like
Speaker 2: a nickname you'd give a friend, a big Man. This
Speaker 2: headless group of bones, dated at three point six million years,
Speaker 2: was found only about forty eight kilometers from Lucy's recovery
Speaker 2: site and analyzed by Haile selass Selassie Cureater Physical Anthropology Museum.
Speaker 2: The partial skeleton a big Man appeared to belong to
Speaker 2: a robust male between one point five and one point
Speaker 2: seven meters tall, about thirty percent larger than Lucy. So again,
Speaker 2: this is forty eight kilometers from where they originally found Lucy.
Speaker 2: Now that's close enough that an animal can you know,
Speaker 2: an animal can survive in a forty eight kilometer range.
Speaker 2: They can range that far and also the biome will
Speaker 2: not change that much, but still.
Speaker 7: That is far enough away that there is.
Speaker 2: It's a large assumption in a large sleep big Man
Speaker 2: shoulder blade is consistent with what a modern human, and
Speaker 2: the curvature of the second rib suggests a wide rib
Speaker 2: cage at the top and a barrel shaped overall, similar
Speaker 2: to that of modern humans and distinct from the more
Speaker 2: funnel shaped rib cage of a chimpanzee. Haile Selasses team
Speaker 2: reported in twenty ten. Not all anthropologists agree with Haile
Speaker 2: Selasses conclusions. For instance, Stony Brooks University paleo anthropologist William
Speaker 2: and Junger's pointed out that the ribs were damaged and
Speaker 2: human like limproportions were based on a single complete lower
Speaker 2: leg bone. Of course, the possibility that the headless big
Speaker 2: Man was neither ape nor in sistral hominid, but rather
Speaker 2: a human like perhaps homoerectus, never enters the minds of
Speaker 2: evolutionary paleoanthropologists. Why because the fossil was found in strata data,
Speaker 2: according to evolutionary presuppositions, date to millions of years before
Speaker 2: humans were supposedly on the scene. That's right, they assign
Speaker 2: different layers of rock strata and an arbitrary date that
Speaker 2: they feel that it should have and then will use
Speaker 2: that to date whatever comes out of it. But yes,
Speaker 2: I just thought this was a good a good look
Speaker 2: at the Lucy's skeleton. If I'm going to talk about
Speaker 2: the crazy LGBT people using it talking about it, I
Speaker 2: thought I would give my take on Lucy as well.
Speaker 2: But we're also going to talk more about the LGBT.
Speaker 2: And this was an utterly insane story because we are
Speaker 2: dealing with utterly insane people.
Speaker 7: This is off of the new.
Speaker 2: American trans woman charged in brutal assault, plan to use
Speaker 2: roommate as sex slave, threaten murder cops a ledge and again,
Speaker 2: if this is not demon possession, I don't know what is.
Speaker 2: Later on in the story they'll talk about how when
Speaker 2: they found the woman she had severe bitemarks on her.
Speaker 2: This is utter insanity and yet another case of a
Speaker 2: training gone mad. A trans woman in Colorado Springs went berserk,
Speaker 2: as they so often do. Yes, we see that very often, and.
Speaker 6: By transwoman it of course means a man. Yes, this
Speaker 6: is from a man. Obviously, just because they're dressed as
Speaker 6: a woman doesn't make it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you can't just put on lipstick and change who
Speaker 2: you are as a person. That's not how it works,
Speaker 2: as they so often do. And sexually assaulted, kidnapped, and
Speaker 2: prisoned his former girlfriend. Police allege he intended to use
Speaker 2: her as a sex slay police allege, and if she
Speaker 2: tried to escape, he warned he would murder her. Obviously
Speaker 2: a well balanced individual with no psychiatric problems at all.
Speaker 2: No demons, No demons there. But a funny thing happened.
Speaker 2: When the story appeared on at least one social media outlet,
Speaker 2: A headline identified the man, Cameron Maldon, as a woman.
Speaker 2: That's right. You have to respect this potential murderer and
Speaker 2: sexual abuser's pronouns. You have to give them that respect,
Speaker 2: of course. And here we see a tweet from Reduc's exclusive.
Speaker 2: A trans identified male in custody after abducting, torturing, and
Speaker 2: sexually assaulting a woman in Colorado Springs for three days.
Speaker 2: Hannah Vermontes born. Cameron Malden had previously played on a
Speaker 2: Colorado women's football team.
Speaker 7: They hate women.
Speaker 2: This is you know, this is a misogyny. Is such
Speaker 2: a played out term you don't actually see it. But
Speaker 2: I do believe that the average male train despises women.
Speaker 2: They have no respect for them. They think that just
Speaker 2: by putting on some makeup and getting some surgeries, they
Speaker 2: can be a woman, when the true the truth is
Speaker 2: so far from that it is utterly disgusting to see
Speaker 2: brutal beating. Cops had cided Vermontes for shoplifting at a
Speaker 2: nearby mall. When his roommate and former girlfriend question him
Speaker 2: about it, he then told him he appeared to be
Speaker 2: undergoing a mental health episode, he flipped out. Reducs reported
Speaker 2: that's when the victim's nightmare began. After she inquired about
Speaker 2: the ticket, vermont has allegedly punched her in the face
Speaker 2: with enough force to knock her to the ground.
Speaker 7: That's right.
Speaker 2: This is a full grown man assaulting a woman.
Speaker 6: They are.
Speaker 2: They have such a callous disregard for the strength they
Speaker 2: possess in comparison with a woman and are more than
Speaker 2: happy to utilize it to brutalize women, whether it's sports
Speaker 2: or in something like this. The victim kept a concealed
Speaker 2: handgun at her waist, and aware of this, the trainy
Speaker 2: disarmed her and held her at gunpoint while threatening to
Speaker 2: shoot her if she resisted. Veramontes then handcuffed her hands
Speaker 2: behind her back and began punching and kicking her. He
Speaker 2: also cut her with a knife before taking to the
Speaker 2: bedroom and sexually assaulting her. Trainny then handcuffed the victim
Speaker 2: to his own wrist and fell asleep. Imagine being handcuffed
Speaker 2: to this freak show who has threatened to murder you,
Speaker 2: has cut you, has sexually assault you. This truly is
Speaker 2: a nightmare for this poor woman. I feel so sorry
Speaker 2: for her. That was November thirtieth. The next day, he
Speaker 2: told the victim that she would be his sex slave
Speaker 2: and threatened murder if she called out for help. On
Speaker 2: December second, he beat and strangled her and shoved various
Speaker 2: objects into her mouth redoct supported. When the victim coughed
Speaker 2: out the items, he removed a towel racked from the
Speaker 2: bathroom and proceeded to beat her with it. On day
Speaker 2: three of the ordeal, she escaped. Vera Montes left the
Speaker 2: handgun on a coffee table and went outside, and the victim,
Speaker 2: realizing one of her handcuffs was loose, was able to
Speaker 2: free one hand grab the gun. She then locked the
Speaker 2: door and ensuring that her attacker was prevented from entering
Speaker 2: the home furious train, he tried to break down through
Speaker 2: the sliding glass door, the website reported, but the victim
Speaker 2: was ready and fired at him twice. Well, as you
Speaker 2: can see, these people are well balanced, and the article
Speaker 2: has other such cases, but it is a common theme.
Speaker 7: We see.
Speaker 2: These people are crazy, they are demon possessed. They hate women.
Speaker 2: It is that simple. Well, we've got a little bit
Speaker 2: of time left. We're going to take a quick break
Speaker 2: and then we'll take a quick look at Israel when
Speaker 2: we come back.
Speaker 1: Decoding the mainstream propaganda. It's the David Knight Show. Using
Speaker 1: free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 5: The seed in our hold, my boys, land and go
Speaker 5: where all can see feed and with our devotion. Boys
Speaker 5: call it the liberty tree. It's a tall, long tree
Speaker 5: and the strong old tree. And we are the sons, Yes,
Speaker 5: they are the sons, the sons of liberty.
Speaker 1: Liberty. It's your move. You're listening to the David night Show.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Welcome back, folks, And as I said, we'll take a
Speaker 2: quick look at Israel. But today we are going to
Speaker 2: let the third hour be some previous clips from the
Speaker 2: show where my dad was hosting. Again, this is the
Speaker 2: David Night Show, and you will still be getting David Knight.
Speaker 2: I cut together an hour long compilation of things that
Speaker 2: I thought were relevant and some of the previous best ofs.
Speaker 2: Got some comments from Junk Silver, A wise man once
Speaker 2: said that gender is biological, objective and binary. Yes, a
Speaker 2: very wise man, indeed, probably one of, if not the
Speaker 2: wisest man I've ever known. In fact, I will go
Speaker 2: so far as to say definitely Another from Junk Silver.
Speaker 2: The Party told you to reject the evidence of your
Speaker 2: eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. Yes,
Speaker 2: you will think what the Party tells you to and
Speaker 2: you will believe it. Toolo Cat nineteen eighty. The Lucy
Speaker 2: skeleton was pieced together from several species bones found over
Speaker 2: a large area by a pagan that was desperate to
Speaker 2: prove his evolution. In religion, that is right, It is
Speaker 2: a religion. It is desperately defended by these people, and
Speaker 2: it is worshiped, and it is a very empty and
Speaker 2: hollow religion. Indeed, But before I get into Israel, I
Speaker 2: just want to thank you all for the prayers and
Speaker 2: ask you to keep praying for our father. He greatly
Speaker 2: appreciates them all. So just pray for healing and pray
Speaker 2: for the people in Gaza as well. Pray that this
Speaker 2: reaches some sort of resolution. But we have another comment
Speaker 2: nights to the storm, Travis. There is a reason military
Speaker 2: has different physical standards for men and women. They have
Speaker 2: tried to make the standards the same for a long time,
Speaker 2: but it never works out.
Speaker 1: That's right. If you try to hold.
Speaker 2: Women to the same physical standard as men in the military,
Speaker 2: you simply will not have women in the military. What
Speaker 2: a shame that would be. I remember reading a story
Speaker 2: many years ago at the point where a father and daughter,
Speaker 2: both in the military, were stationed at the same base.
Speaker 2: And I believe Iraq and I can't even imagine the
Speaker 2: level of mental anguish and strain that must put on
Speaker 2: someone to have your own child there with you, and
Speaker 2: especially you know your daughter this.
Speaker 7: Uh.
Speaker 2: You know, there comes a time, I believe where you
Speaker 2: have where you're never going to not want to protect
Speaker 2: your children. But when you know a boy reaches a
Speaker 2: certain age, you realize that there's you know, they have
Speaker 2: to offend for themselves to some extent, whereas a daughter,
Speaker 2: I would think you are always more prone to wanting
Speaker 2: to defend them and protect them, because women do need
Speaker 2: to be defended and protected.
Speaker 1: It is simply how it is.
Speaker 2: There are biological objective differences that are easily observable, and
Speaker 2: to pretend otherwise is lunacy. But yeah, the military continually
Speaker 2: does whatever it can to up their numbers of women
Speaker 2: and even women in combat, which my opinion just a bad,
Speaker 2: bad idea. I wouldn't co sign. Don't co sign. And
Speaker 2: this is from anti War. As I said, we're going
Speaker 2: to take a quick look at what's going on with
Speaker 2: Israel netanyah who says the ethnic cleansing of Gaza is inevitable.
Speaker 2: This is by Dave de Camp. We've covered Dave de
Speaker 2: Camp here on the show before, lots of good articles
Speaker 2: on anti war dot com. Israeli leaders said the main
Speaker 2: problem preventing immigration was the lack of countries willing to
Speaker 2: take in Palestinian refugees. Well, I really think the main
Speaker 2: problem is the people creating the refugees. Really, if you
Speaker 2: are able to stop the creation of refugees, then the
Speaker 2: countries won't need to take them. It's it's kind of
Speaker 2: a simple problem when you look at it from that perspective.
Speaker 2: We are destroying more and more homes, and Gozens have
Speaker 2: nowhere to return to. The only inevitable outcome will be
Speaker 2: the wish of Gozins to emigrate outside of the Gaza strip. Netnya,
Speaker 2: who said at the Nasset News sets Foreign Affairs and
Speaker 2: Defense Committee, according to the Jusalem Post, is just laying
Speaker 2: it out there. They are destroying their homes, they are
Speaker 2: destroying their ability to live there. They are cleansing the area.
Speaker 3: It is.
Speaker 2: While some people may not call it a genocide, it is.
Speaker 2: It is realistically they want to wipe them all out.
Speaker 2: Israeli officials have made clear that the ethnic cleansing of
Speaker 2: the Palestinian population of Gaza is their ultimate goal, but
Speaker 2: it remains unclear where the Palestinians would go. And you
Speaker 2: told the committee that the main problem preventing immigration is
Speaker 2: the lack of countries willing to take in the Palestinians.
Speaker 2: Israel has maintained a total blockade on Gaza since March second,
Speaker 2: and has developed plans to start bringing in aid using
Speaker 2: private US security contractors use food starving Palestinians into a
Speaker 2: tiny part of southern Gaza.
Speaker 7: That's right.
Speaker 2: You're going to lure them in with food like you
Speaker 2: would with an animal, because that is how Israelis treat
Speaker 2: the Gazans. It is horrifying what they have done to them.
Speaker 2: And it does not seem to be anywhere near the end.
Speaker 2: And this is from the New American Israel begins occupying
Speaker 2: all of Gaza. This is by Paul dragu This is
Speaker 2: from yesterday. After President Donald Trump left the Middle East.
Speaker 7: On Friday, Israel.
Speaker 2: Launched its mission to take over all of Gaza, following
Speaker 2: through on a promise officials made a week ago. Israeli
Speaker 2: Prime Minister Benjamin and Yahu said in a video statement
Speaker 2: on Monday that the aim is total occupation. The goal
Speaker 2: of the current expansion of the IDs operation in the
Speaker 2: Gaza Strip is for the IDF Israeli Defense Force to
Speaker 2: take control of the entire territory in order to prevent
Speaker 2: Hamas from looting humanitarian aid. And that is just a
Speaker 2: cover story. I am sure that Israel does not care
Speaker 2: if Hamas takes all the humanitarian aid. They have proven
Speaker 2: time and time again they do not care about the
Speaker 2: people of Gaza. They want the land and they will
Speaker 2: take it however they can, and they will bomb anyone
Speaker 2: and kill anyone that gets in that way. And if
Speaker 2: you live there as a Palestinian, you are in their way.
Speaker 2: They want the land, folks. Israel imposed a total black
Speaker 2: cade around Gaza, as we said on March second, with
Speaker 2: this agenda of strong arming Hamas into concessions. And again
Speaker 2: Hamas is not a good organization, it is not is
Speaker 2: not something that I would praise, but they are what
Speaker 2: the Palestinians have as a as their defenders. There aren't
Speaker 2: Both sides in this have committed atrocities, they have raped
Speaker 2: and murdered each other. There are, as I said, no
Speaker 2: good sides. But it is not wrong to call out
Speaker 2: when someone is doing the wrong thing, no matter who
Speaker 2: they are. Israel has faced intense criticism over the inhumane
Speaker 2: conditions of the Palestinians, most notably from American college students
Speaker 2: in the United Nations to historically untrustworthy sources, but the
Speaker 2: criticism is crossing ideological and political barriers. The issue has
Speaker 2: taken center stage on several of the most popular mediate
Speaker 2: platforms among conservatives, Republicans, and libertarians, including the Joe Rogan
Speaker 2: Experience and Tucker Carlson podcasts. Poule suggests Israel has now
Speaker 2: lost support even among its most consistently loyal block Republicans.
Speaker 2: The Pew Research Center found that the portion of Republicans
Speaker 2: who said they had unfavorable unfavorable views of Israel rose
Speaker 2: from twenty seven percent to thirty seven percent between twenty
Speaker 2: twenty two and twenty twenty five. Well, I'm at least
Speaker 2: glad to see that people are beginning to at least
Speaker 2: take notice of what Israel is doing in Gaza. Hamas
Speaker 2: slaughtered nearly twelve hundred civilians on October seventh, That's right,
Speaker 2: they did twenty twenty three. They raped and captured hundreds more.
Speaker 2: Tragedy of bounds on both sides, making it worse. Is
Speaker 2: a nocean that it could have been prevented if only
Speaker 2: high ranking Israeli officials would have acted on the numerous
Speaker 2: intelligence pieces they had indicating that October seventh attack was coming. Yes,
Speaker 2: it's hard to believe that Hamas was able to organize
Speaker 2: this without Israel's massive intelligence network noticing, but just wanted
Speaker 2: to cover what is going on in Israel. It is
Speaker 2: a tragedy, and we can't turn our eyes away from it.
Speaker 6: It is a horror.
Speaker 2: As I said the last hour of the show, we
Speaker 2: are going to play some clips from the previous shows.
Speaker 7: They are.
Speaker 2: What I thought to be the best.
Speaker 6: It's about.
Speaker 2: It's a compilation of many different topics. So again I
Speaker 2: just want to thank you all for your support, your prayers,
Speaker 2: and once again asked that if you would like to
Speaker 2: support us, you can do so on the David Knight
Speaker 2: Show dot com or subscribe Star dot com, forward slash
Speaker 2: the David Night Show, Davidnight dot Gold trans Journal with
Speaker 2: a promo code night. You can send us a check
Speaker 2: in the mail at the po box. But thank you
Speaker 2: all so much. We appreciate it and I will see
Speaker 2: you all tomorrow.
Speaker 7: Let me talk a little bit about what is going
Speaker 7: on with the vaccine stuff, because we have a lot
Speaker 7: of new information about that's a course with measles. They're
Speaker 7: pushing the panic button really hard this article from the
Speaker 7: Daily Mail. Listen to this headline. DC is on red
Speaker 7: alert as the world's most infectious disease as detected. What
Speaker 7: would that be? Well, they want to tell you that
Speaker 7: it's measles, Well, it's a good thing. Is not anything serious?
Speaker 7: Is all I can say. This reminds me very much
Speaker 7: of Sea Pack.
Speaker 2: I will say, though, when you're as old and decrepit
Speaker 2: as most of the government is, measles might actually be
Speaker 2: a threat.
Speaker 7: It might be really bad for Mitch McConnell. Of course,
Speaker 7: Stairs are a threat to him as well, so I
Speaker 7: guess we should Banstairs. I don't know, but it reminds
Speaker 7: me of Seapack. Back in twenty twenty. Everybody goes up
Speaker 7: to Seapack and they were just kicking off this campaign
Speaker 7: of fear about a pandemic. Remember they said they're having
Speaker 7: a convention there, and all the Liberals are saying, yeah,
Speaker 7: you guys are all going to die, and I'm so
Speaker 7: glad you're all going to die and everything. Well they didn't.
Speaker 7: None of them died. You talk about decrepit people, right,
Speaker 7: Decrepit politicians in Washington, d C and COVID did nothing
Speaker 7: to them. But apparently measles is now even more important
Speaker 7: to them.
Speaker 1: And we know why.
Speaker 7: I mean, this is all a manufactured thing. This is
Speaker 7: what they're saying, most infectious disease in the world. Health
Speaker 7: chiefs in Washington, D C. Do you know we got
Speaker 7: health chiefs, got health czars and dictators have confirmed a
Speaker 7: case of measles, a case and a patient who visited
Speaker 7: multiple locations while contagious. Now they haven't had anybody else
Speaker 7: come down with this. As hard as they've been trying
Speaker 7: in Texas and other places to try to manufacture a pandemic.
Speaker 7: You mean you can come up with three hundred cases
Speaker 7: in a state that's got thirty million people, and this
Speaker 7: is your most infectious disease. Maybe we don't have to
Speaker 7: worry about infectious diseases. Maybe this whole contagion thing is
Speaker 7: a lot of hooey. Anyway, anyone who is unvaccinated or
Speaker 7: who got their MMR shots before nineteen sixty three, watch,
Speaker 7: I don't even think they had MMR shots before I'm sorry,
Speaker 7: nineteen sixty eight. I don't think they had them before
Speaker 7: nineteen sixty eight. That's when they reformulated it. They had
Speaker 7: measles going back to nineteen sixty three. They reformulated in
Speaker 7: nineteen sixty eight. I'm not sure exactly the date that
Speaker 7: they combined it with the others, but anyway, the growing
Speaker 7: measles outbreaks as a daily mail in the US has
Speaker 7: infected over three hundred people in West Texas out of
Speaker 7: thirty one million. It's so contagious. It comes in a
Speaker 7: time of falling vaccine, vaccine rates and low trust and
Speaker 7: public health institutions. That, folks, is the crisis. The falling
Speaker 7: vaccination rates and the low trust in these people. That
Speaker 7: is their crisis. And they're pulling out all the stops
Speaker 7: and having all of their surrogates in the media pull
Speaker 7: out all the stops. And so now you know three
Speaker 7: hundred people out of thirty one million in Texas and
Speaker 7: in Kansas out of three million people, they say they've
Speaker 7: got twenty three cases. Wow, the world's most infectious disease.
Speaker 7: Be afraid, be very afraid. Right, Well, it turns out
Speaker 7: if we go back and we revisit the measles death.
Speaker 7: Remember they were so excited when they had a measles death.
Speaker 7: And as a matter of fact, the doctor that is
Speaker 7: there that works with the Mennonite families who don't want
Speaker 7: to get their kids vaccinated, he said he was being
Speaker 7: interviewed when that news broke, and he said the reporter
Speaker 7: was actually gleeful about that. He said, it was disgusting
Speaker 7: to see that, but they wanted that. Well, it turns
Speaker 7: out that it really wasn't about measles after all, And
Speaker 7: we had an earlier report from Children's Health Defense saying
Speaker 7: that the family had complained that they were being that
Speaker 7: the child was being denied necessary respiratory treatment and things
Speaker 7: like that. We have more information now because the family
Speaker 7: said they want to speak out. A child who died
Speaker 7: in a Texas hospital after developing pneumonia following a measle's
Speaker 7: infection died as a result of medical error, including a
Speaker 7: failure to administer the correct antibiotic in time. The family
Speaker 7: of the six year old girl. The parents said that
Speaker 7: they wanted to people to know what had happened to
Speaker 7: their daughter so that it wouldn't happen to other children.
Speaker 7: They got their records from the Covenant Children's Hospital in Lubbock,
Speaker 7: where their child died on February the twenty sixth. The
Speaker 7: parents told doctor Ben Edwards, who had successfully treated their
Speaker 7: other children for measles, that they didn't want to use
Speaker 7: the information uncovered in the medical records to inflame the situation. However,
Speaker 7: they did want to get the world out, the word
Speaker 7: out about the mistake if it could prevent it from
Speaker 7: happening to other children. We'll see that's the key thing.
Speaker 7: You know, they don't want to put themselves and their
Speaker 7: family at the center of this firestorm coming from the
Speaker 7: media and from the pharmaceutical companies to vaccinate everybody. But
Speaker 7: here's the issue, folks. This is not about winning an
Speaker 7: argument as it is for these these reporters who are
Speaker 7: being paid by the pharmaceutical companies, so they're very excited
Speaker 7: that they can say that somebody died from measles, even
Speaker 7: though they didn't die. It's about this this meme. I
Speaker 7: saw this on Twitter. It was put up by doctor
Speaker 7: Jane Ruby. This is what we're talking about. Here's a
Speaker 7: baby on the floor and for those people who are
Speaker 7: listening and not seeing what this is, there are needles
Speaker 7: and boxes of vaccines surrounding this child and it's unbelievable.
Speaker 7: But that's what they want to put into your child.
Speaker 7: And they want seventy six vaccines by the time the
Speaker 7: child turned eighteen. And what was account that I came
Speaker 7: up with the other day the first year, twenty six
Speaker 7: of them in a child in the first year, starting
Speaker 7: just hours after birth. There's no wonder that we have
Speaker 7: an epidemic of autism and allergies and other things like that.
Speaker 7: In America. That's what this fight is about. That picture
Speaker 7: right there, that's what this is about. And it's not
Speaker 7: about you know, your family and the other family, but
Speaker 7: the truth needs to come out. Well is doctor Pierre Corey,
Speaker 7: who has a lot of experience in pulmonary and critical
Speaker 7: care medicine. They took the records to him Children's Health
Speaker 7: defense in the family. He looked at the records. He says,
Speaker 7: I've done medical case reviews from malpractice lawyers for a
Speaker 7: good part of my career. This case was tragic, he said.
Speaker 7: According to doctor Pierre Corey's analysis of the records, the
Speaker 7: girl died from a secondary bacterial pneumonia that had little
Speaker 7: to do with measles, he said, When I said it
Speaker 7: had little to do with measlescondary bacterial pneumonias can happen
Speaker 7: after any viral infection. What does the infection even need
Speaker 7: to be viral? We're talking about a bacterial pneumonia. Why
Speaker 7: is it even necessary that it be characterized as viral?
Speaker 7: And how does a viral go How does a viral
Speaker 7: create an environment for bacteria. I've never understood that. I
Speaker 7: still don't understand that. I still don't believe that because again,
Speaker 7: all the viral stuff that they do is not based
Speaker 7: on observational science. They haven't observed or isolated any of
Speaker 7: this stuff. And they don't see because they can't observe
Speaker 7: the viruses. They don't even bother to isolate them. You
Speaker 7: don't see that. Oh well, what this person is sick
Speaker 7: and they've got We can see that with bacteria. You
Speaker 7: can't see that with a virus. So, nevertheless, this child
Speaker 7: had bacterial pneumonia, it said, initially admitted to the emergency
Speaker 7: room for secondary bacterial pneumonia. At that time, Measel's rash
Speaker 7: had already faded. She was not administered the correct antibiotic
Speaker 7: for treating her secondary bacterial pneumonia until roughly two and
Speaker 7: a half days later. Doctors had already placed her on
Speaker 7: a mechanical ventilator at that time. And I said that
Speaker 7: the very first day, I said, I bet they killed
Speaker 7: her with a ventilator, didn't I. Medical error is the
Speaker 7: third leaning cause of death in the US. Here's your epidemic, folks.
Speaker 7: Medical malpractice. What they call that iatrogenic deaths, you know,
Speaker 7: deaths caused by the doctors. And then you add to
Speaker 7: that the deaths caused by the pharmaceuticals. So again, this
Speaker 7: is not a debate that we should run from. This
Speaker 7: is not information that we should run from. This information
Speaker 7: we should push out there because this is about saving lives.
Speaker 7: That's what the medical community ought to be about. But
Speaker 7: they're not. So he says, there's a potential risk, there's complications,
Speaker 7: there's death from MMR. He said, we need to have
Speaker 7: that conversation at the table, both sides in a truthful,
Speaker 7: honest manner, for the sake of these children. Well, the
Speaker 7: problem is is that they have scheduled autism in this
Speaker 7: kind of approach. The vaccine schedule is a schedule for autism,
Speaker 7: for autoimmune disease, for allergies, and the rest of it.
Speaker 1: That's what that is.
Speaker 7: It's scheduled. They have it scheduled. That needs to be
Speaker 7: a pode. Joe Rogan just had a doctor on to
Speaker 7: talk about what she had seen, and she's written a
Speaker 7: book on vaccines and what she discovered. She said she
Speaker 7: didn't come to it from a standpoint she had anybody
Speaker 7: in her family that had been harmed by it. She
Speaker 7: had no bias one way or the other. It just
Speaker 7: came to her. She started looking at as a researcher,
Speaker 7: and because of her honesty and integrity, she went where
Speaker 7: the research led, and of course it's led to her
Speaker 7: being persecuted quite a bit. So it's good that she
Speaker 7: was on the rogun thing. This is what she had
Speaker 7: to say about the use of mercury in vaccines.
Speaker 8: This is one of the realities of vaccine manufacture which
Speaker 8: I want your audience to understand, is that vaccines, while
Speaker 8: it might look like just a clear liquid, in order
Speaker 8: to make a vaccine, you have to have either a
Speaker 8: col that you put ulcers on and scrape the puss off,
Speaker 8: or you can evolve it as it had evolved to
Speaker 8: maybe getting you know, some tumorous cells that came out
Speaker 8: of a cocker spaniel's kidney or monkey balls or monkey kidneys,
Speaker 8: and you plate those cells out and then you inoculate
Speaker 8: it with what you want to grow to put in
Speaker 8: your vaccine later. But in order to keep those cells alive,
Speaker 8: you have to put animal blood on it. You have
Speaker 8: to put different nutrients on top of it. You have
Speaker 8: to put antibiotics, canemycin, you know, things like that related
Speaker 8: to the covid here mercury. Okay, so in the end
Speaker 8: you can kill you can make sure when you have
Speaker 8: your final product that if you put a little bit
Speaker 8: murciy here in there, that it's less likely for any
Speaker 8: of the fungus or the spores, or the bacteria or
Speaker 8: the adventitious viruses that you didn't know about that were
Speaker 8: there before will be in your final product.
Speaker 3: Wonderful.
Speaker 8: So you have a product now that you can be
Speaker 8: not completely sure has any of these deadly microbes, but
Speaker 8: now has mercury, which the only place is it's actually
Speaker 8: okay to have on the planet. Mercury is in vaccines,
Speaker 8: your tooth, or a toxic landfill. So if you were
Speaker 8: to drop a vaccine at a vaccine clinic onto the floor,
Speaker 8: the HASMAC guys would come in. You're not allowed to
Speaker 8: just pick it up. If it's got if it's a
Speaker 8: mercury containing vaccine has mat, people have to come and
Speaker 8: take that away. Yet we're okay to take you know,
Speaker 8: set a portion of that vial and inject it into
Speaker 8: you know, child, a three month old child.
Speaker 2: How does that work?
Speaker 7: Yeah? How does that work? And I had my realization
Speaker 7: that thimerosol was mercury when, as I said before, when
Speaker 7: I was using eyedrops on, I had contact lenses back
Speaker 7: in eighties. I guess it was, and I'd put it
Speaker 7: in in my eyes would just go blood right immediately.
Speaker 7: It's like, I can't even use these things. And I
Speaker 7: told that to an optometrist who was trying to get
Speaker 7: me to use contacts at one point. He goes, oh,
Speaker 7: that's thimerosol.
Speaker 1: That's mercury.
Speaker 7: We don't use that anymore. Well, except that they do
Speaker 7: in vaccines and fillings and things like that. And of
Speaker 7: course that's in a much more dangerous than you know,
Speaker 7: injecting it than putting it into your eyes. Even so, yeah,
Speaker 7: how did we get to this point? Well, it turns
Speaker 7: out researchers have conducted a case control study involving one
Speaker 7: hundred and sixty three MS cases and sixteen hundred and
Speaker 7: four matched controls, and they found that individuals vaccinated for
Speaker 7: hepatitis B within three years before their MS diagnosis had
Speaker 7: significantly higher risk of developing MS compared to un vaccinated individuals.
Speaker 7: They don't know and they don't care. People who are
Speaker 7: vaccinated had an increase in their rate of MS. We
Speaker 7: don't even know what the mechanism is for that. I mean,
Speaker 7: we can see it if we look at the trends,
Speaker 7: but we don't know. And here's a doctor who said
Speaker 7: that they think maybe that the MS is related to parasites.
Speaker 9: You make it sound in organized medicine that because we
Speaker 9: can label something, we really understand it. And one of
Speaker 9: my favorite examples is multiple sclerosis.
Speaker 7: You know, we claim that.
Speaker 9: And I'm a spine sergeon. For all my life, I
Speaker 9: did neurology evaluations and we'd have somebody come in and
Speaker 9: they thought that was their their back of their neck,
Speaker 9: and I'd examine them and see them and think, no,
Speaker 9: that's not what's going on. Let's get you know, this
Speaker 9: may be something else, thinking about multiple sclerosis or MS.
Speaker 7: So I would get.
Speaker 9: An MRI of the brain and the spinal cord and
Speaker 9: it would come back with a reading by the and
Speaker 9: I'd look at it too, but it would come back
Speaker 9: as a reading from the radiologist. Oh there are plaques
Speaker 9: in the brain spinal cord and that means MS.
Speaker 7: So, but what is MS?
Speaker 9: They never take it the next step and what causes this? Well,
Speaker 9: finally we have a really good pathologist, doctor McDonald down
Speaker 9: I think it's in Florida, who actually did very careful
Speaker 9: sectioning of the brain and spinal cord and found out
Speaker 9: that one hundred percent of the dead MS patients he
Speaker 9: had autopsied had parasites in their brain and spinal cord.
Speaker 7: Some of it was actually grossly visible to the naked eye.
Speaker 9: So we just accepted, over my whole forty five years
Speaker 9: in medicine, we accepted that the smart people at the
Speaker 9: universities were paying attention to this stuff. And what we're
Speaker 9: learning thanks to COVID, I will say is that they
Speaker 9: weren't paying attention. That this is a this can't be
Speaker 9: by accident. One of the things too, I'll say is
Speaker 9: that after forty five years in medicine and seeing them
Speaker 9: telling us things that are completely wrong over and over
Speaker 9: and over again, you finally wake up and realize this
Speaker 9: is not by accident. This is a long term, calculated
Speaker 9: plan to keep us sick for some way reason and
Speaker 9: to kill us prettymaturely.
Speaker 7: And that's why they should not be allowed to advertise
Speaker 7: on TV and to buy the silence of the people
Speaker 7: that should be calling this stuff out. But you know,
Speaker 7: when you talk about the MS, you said one hundred
Speaker 7: percent of the patients that she autopsy had parasites with it.
Speaker 7: I just told you that people who had been vaccinated
Speaker 7: three years before their diagnosis of MS had a significantly
Speaker 7: higher risk of MS than did the unvaccinated people. And
Speaker 7: it could it be something like parasites are being transferred
Speaker 7: in the vaccines. Do you really think that these vaccines
Speaker 7: are sterile? Do you think they're clean?
Speaker 10: Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
Speaker 10: these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
Speaker 10: all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
Speaker 10: And I could if only David Knight would send me
Speaker 10: one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
Speaker 10: black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But
Speaker 10: he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
Speaker 10: American suckers can buy me some at the Davidnightshow dot com,
Speaker 10: and David is giving a ten percent discount to listeners
Speaker 10: from now until twenty twenty five.
Speaker 6: At that price, you.
Speaker 10: Should be able to buy me several hundred. Those amazing
Speaker 10: sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful, I'd wear something
Speaker 10: other than green military cosplay to my various galas and
Speaker 10: social events. If you want to save on shipping just
Speaker 10: put it in the next package of bombs and missiles
Speaker 10: coming from the USA.
Speaker 7: Part. Let's talk though about RFK Junior and this person
Speaker 7: who's now been picked for the CDC. This is on
Speaker 7: children's health defense, and at least in this article they
Speaker 7: were pretty honest about this, they said. Critics called out
Speaker 7: Susan Monarez because of her work for biosecurity agencies. That
Speaker 7: was my concern about it. Of course, we know that
Speaker 7: she is a vaccine cheerleader and so forth. But then
Speaker 7: they said, this is again children's health defense that was
Speaker 7: under RFK Junior. He's left now on leave to run AHHS.
Speaker 7: RFK Junior said, he quote ham picked Monarez because she
Speaker 7: is a longtime champion of MAHA. Well, Maha hasn't been
Speaker 7: around for a long time, has it. I mean, it
Speaker 7: is itself is pretty much a lie. But everything about
Speaker 7: MAHA is a lie. He said. She is caring, compassionate,
Speaker 7: brilliant microbiologist, and a tech wizard who will reorient CDC
Speaker 7: toward public health and gold standard science. And this is
Speaker 7: what I'm concerned about. It's going to become more about
Speaker 7: artificial intelligence and nanotech with this. By the way, Harry
Speaker 7: Hound sent me a tweet that people have done some
Speaker 7: background into her husband. Her husband is also a part
Speaker 7: of the spook industry. He's with the National Security Directorate.
Speaker 7: Isn't that interesting? Well? Susan Monarez came under fire on
Speaker 7: X immediately following yesterday's announcements, says Children's Health Defense. Trump
Speaker 7: tapped Monorez two weeks after he withdrew his first nominee,
Speaker 7: doctor David Weldon. Weldon failed to secure enough votes, reportedly
Speaker 7: because of comments that he had made about the links
Speaker 7: between vaccines and autism, but RFK Junior said that he
Speaker 7: had picked her and I just read you that quote.
Speaker 7: Some MAHA supporters and health freedom activists who disagreed with
Speaker 7: Kennedy's characterization took to X to vocalize her criticisms, says
Speaker 7: Children's Health Defense. One account says afraid to call it
Speaker 7: what it is. Another terrible mistake from the Trump administration.
Speaker 1: Went.
Speaker 7: As the person who's anonymous, their account has died. Suddenly,
Speaker 7: they're not afraid to call it what it is. It's
Speaker 7: a mistake there. You are afraid to call it what
Speaker 7: it is. It's a betrayal. It was a mistake to
Speaker 7: support Trump. This is the guy who pushed the mRNA
Speaker 7: vaccines and everybody and talked about it incessantly to the
Speaker 7: consternation of people like Alex Jones and who's that other guy,
Speaker 7: Wayne Allen Root. You know they're constantly saying, stop talking
Speaker 7: pushing the vaccine. We've got to win this election. Tell
Speaker 7: them that you did. If you can't tell them that
Speaker 7: they're bad, just stop talking about it. Well he can't.
Speaker 7: He can't stop talking about it. And if anybody he
Speaker 7: pushes him on it, he goes into this thing about
Speaker 7: how he saved us, all saved millions of lives. No,
Speaker 7: you killed millions of people worldwide with your vaccine that
Speaker 7: you funded, that you pushed under the advertisement advertisement for it.
Speaker 7: You continued to brag about it nevertheless. So it was
Speaker 7: not a mistake. This is what we always said. Well,
Speaker 7: you know mistakes were made. No, No, wasn't a mistake.
Speaker 7: It was pure iniquity. This is not a sin where
Speaker 7: you missed the target. This is iniquity conceived in your heart,
Speaker 7: pushed out and shown to everybody. This guy is definitely
Speaker 7: afraid to say that Trump did this. Another person says,
Speaker 7: we adamantly oppose Susan Monterrez as the next CDC director
Speaker 7: that's helped freedom Louisiana, so this would be an absolute travesty.
Speaker 7: Doctor Brian Tyson, vocal critic of COVID nineteen vaccines, said
Speaker 7: Trump is not serious about MAHA. Anybody serious about MAHA.
Speaker 7: Only the Trump suckers are serious about MAHA. I said yesterday,
Speaker 7: Jane Ruby said, look, he's hired a murderous put out there,
Speaker 7: and that was the thing that got me kicked off
Speaker 7: for a weekend off of Spreaker, where I had been
Speaker 7: for six years talking using the phrase murder, which I
Speaker 7: stand by. I think the pharmaceutical companies are murderers, murderers.
Speaker 7: Toby Rodgers, who is monitoring X, said there's literally zero
Speaker 7: support from Monorez on the platform. Many people had been
Speaker 7: supporting Joseph Latipo, the Florida Surgeon General. Either way, what's
Speaker 7: Kennedy going to do about this? Kennedy had said the
Speaker 7: posts erroneously attributed to Monarez supporting COVID nineteen vaccines for children.
Speaker 7: He said, no, no, no, no. That was written during
Speaker 7: the Biden administration when doctor Mandy Cohen was CDC director.
Speaker 7: It just happened to have her name on it. Well,
Speaker 7: why did she allow that to go out if she
Speaker 7: didn't have anything to do with it. This sounds like
Speaker 7: the kind of explanation we got from RFK Junior when
Speaker 7: he called for the imprisonment and or execution of people
Speaker 7: that he disagreed with when he was pushing climate mcguffins.
Speaker 7: So I think that she is fully on board with
Speaker 7: the vaccine stuff, no doubt about it. Come on, stop
Speaker 7: lying to see again. Do you need any more proof
Speaker 7: to see what RFKJ is about, what MAHA is about
Speaker 7: than this. It wasn't bad enough that she gets in there,
Speaker 7: but then he now is going to defend her and
Speaker 7: even tell you that she's not pro vaccine a liar.
Speaker 7: He is just amazing. Some critics raise concern about Montereza's
Speaker 7: work and biosecurity. Yeah, that was my big concern because
Speaker 7: we know that these people are going to be pro vaccine,
Speaker 7: but this takes it to the next level. As I said,
Speaker 7: it's going to be AI m RNA. It's going to
Speaker 7: be called these things a genetic code injection from the
Speaker 7: very beginning, but it's going to be AI GCI, just
Speaker 7: like we saw with Stargate. That's why I said, I
Speaker 7: think this was planned. I think they put out Dave
Speaker 7: Wolden there so that shill organizations like Gateway Pundit would say,
Speaker 7: look at this, they shut down what Trump really wanted,
Speaker 7: as if he couldn't find somebody else to put in
Speaker 7: there until they get tired of it. Trump should be
Speaker 7: shutting down the CDC. RFK Junior should be shutting down
Speaker 7: the CDC, not putting somebody in there. But they're going
Speaker 7: to put somebody in there. And it's like, Okay, well,
Speaker 7: this is who I would really like to have, but
Speaker 7: since you won't let me have them, I'll go with
Speaker 7: your pick. How's that you like that Gateway Pundit, that's
Speaker 7: that's your Trump right there. They say it was a
Speaker 7: rhino who shut it down. No, Trump is the rhino.
Speaker 7: He's I guess he's not a Democrat, he's a globalist.
Speaker 7: I don't know anyway. Some critics raised concerns about her
Speaker 7: work in biosecurity, so Jeffrey Tucker Brownstone Institute said she
Speaker 7: ticks every deep state box. He said, from the agencies
Speaker 7: who brought you COVID lockdown, dangerous shots, and Jeffrey, from
Speaker 7: the president who brought you COVID lockdowns and dangerous shots.
Speaker 7: Come on, it's not just the agencies Trump. They were
Speaker 7: all these agencies were under Trump and he was fully
Speaker 7: on board. He bragged about it for years after he
Speaker 7: left the presidency. So this CDC director and RK Junior,
Speaker 7: all the rest of them are from the president who
Speaker 7: brought you lockdowns, dangerous shots, and the phony pandemic. So
Speaker 7: here's your new CDC director with a CV that ticks
Speaker 7: every deep state box, he said. So she has worked
Speaker 7: for every major biosecurity agency that there is the very
Speaker 7: one behind so much of the dangerous research, the secretive
Speaker 7: goings on that have created so many disasters. On the
Speaker 7: face of it, it seems like very bad news, said Tucker.
Speaker 7: But then he spends it, and he says, he makes
Speaker 7: excuses for this, just like these other people. Well, you
Speaker 7: know some mistakes were made. Well, these are the agencies
Speaker 7: that were bad. But you know, Trump's not bad, He's good,
Speaker 7: he says. Cleaning up the mess at CDC requires more
Speaker 7: than a pundent, an influencer, or an outspoken critic of
Speaker 7: the status quo. Yeah, you know what it requires requires
Speaker 7: somebody telling the truth. That's what it requires. That's not punditry,
Speaker 7: it's not spinning stuff. To tell the truth is not
Speaker 7: being a pundit. To tell the truth is not influencing
Speaker 7: somebody trying to influence somebody push them towards this group
Speaker 7: or that group. And if the truth is critical, so
Speaker 7: be it. And it takes somebody with a backbone to
Speaker 7: stick to what is right. That's what it takes, Jeffrey.
Speaker 7: It doesn't take somebody who knows it from the inside.
Speaker 7: This is why he says, Well, it doesn't take any
Speaker 7: of those other things he said. It require expert management
Speaker 7: experience to the problem, technical expertise, knowledge that only comes
Speaker 7: through long exposure to the world of classified information, backed
Speaker 7: by training in infectious diseases. No, what it requires is
Speaker 7: the truth. Because if people understood what has been done
Speaker 7: at the CDC, they would go down to that abomination
Speaker 7: in Atlanta and they would tear it down brick by brick.
Speaker 7: If the understood what the CDC was doing, if understood
Speaker 7: what the FDA is doing, they would tear those buildings down.
Speaker 7: They wouldn't wait for Trump to cut the funding. They
Speaker 7: wouldn't let him put in another globalist. We don't We're
Speaker 7: not going to save this from the top down. We're
Speaker 7: not going to have anybody that is on our side
Speaker 7: appointed by Trump or by RFK Junior or the rest
Speaker 7: of these people. It's going to require that people come
Speaker 7: to their senses, that they stop complying with this stuff,
Speaker 7: and that they actually do active resistance against it. And
Speaker 7: that's going to require the truth, not punditry, not influence.
Speaker 7: He said, In other words, it takes a hacker to
Speaker 7: defeat the hackers. Well, here's the problem, Jeffrey. What they're
Speaker 7: doing is they are hacking our bodies. Do you understand
Speaker 7: the difference. Get rid of this institutional think the institutions
Speaker 7: are corrupt. They need to be torn down and not replaced.
Speaker 7: Monareez assumed the acting director position, leaving her job. Let's
Speaker 7: say this as deputy director of the Advanced Research Project
Speaker 7: Agency for Help Health. Okay, ARPA. H ARPA very much
Speaker 7: like DARPA, but there's also another one called BARTA, and
Speaker 7: she's been involved in both of those. To me, that's
Speaker 7: checking all the boxes.
Speaker 6: So the.
Speaker 7: ARPA h was recently created by the Biden administration. The
Speaker 7: purpose is to accelerate high risk, high reward bio medical research.
Speaker 7: High risk, high reward is not the way they sold
Speaker 7: the m RNA shot to US high risk, high reward.
Speaker 7: Oh no, actually, I told us there's no risk at all.
Speaker 7: It's a moonshot. It's a miracle from God. Right, That's
Speaker 7: the way you had some of these so called Christian
Speaker 7: leaders sell it. ARPA H is modeled after the US
Speaker 7: Military's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency DARPA. DARPA that does
Speaker 7: these heinous killer robot's, autonomous killer robots, autonomous cars and
Speaker 7: drons and all the rest. All of that is coming
Speaker 7: from DARPA, the mind control stuff, the brain computer interface, neuralink,
Speaker 7: and all the rest of these creepy things that Elon
Speaker 7: Musk is doing. Of course, they were all projects that
Speaker 7: began with DARPA. The White House Office of Science and
Speaker 7: Technology Policy under President George Bush was where she also worked. Hey,
Speaker 7: you know George W. Bush, the guy who gave us
Speaker 7: the prep Act, the guy under whom they did Dark
Speaker 7: Winter two months before nine to eleven. They had the
Speaker 7: false flag anthrax attack a week later, and then they
Speaker 7: pushed out the model legislation and continued to practice it.
Speaker 7: That guy who kicked it off nine to eleven was
Speaker 7: just the first shoe to drop. The other one dropped
Speaker 7: with Trump and in between George W. Bush put in
Speaker 7: the Prep Act to make sure that you won't get
Speaker 7: compensated for anything that they do to you, to deny
Speaker 7: your essentially your personhood. You know what we can do
Speaker 7: to your body whatever we wish, and there's nothing you're
Speaker 7: going to get from it. So that Office of Science
Speaker 7: and Technology SEE was an advisor to BARD, the Biomedical
Speaker 7: Advanced Research and Development Authority. In recent DARPA TV video,
Speaker 7: Monarez promoted the use of AI for healthcare, touting its
Speaker 7: use by patients, providers, and for the defense of the
Speaker 7: Listen to this the health ecosystem. This is her mentality.
Speaker 7: This is the person that Trump has put in at CDC,
Speaker 7: the person that was handpicked by RFK Junior, that tells
Speaker 7: you everything about the two of them, and this phony
Speaker 7: Maha thing right there, the health ecosystem. We need to
Speaker 7: have artificial intelligence doing that. Most of her comments were vague,
Speaker 7: but she celebrated arpa h's plan to fund anything quote
Speaker 7: unquote that furthers its mission. Arpa H says, and this
Speaker 7: is children's health defense, and we've given you their dish
Speaker 7: the dirt here on this stuff. For whatever reason, I
Speaker 7: hope they're going to keep it honest. RPAH, which is
Speaker 7: dedicated to increasing the use of generative AI and operations
Speaker 7: and across the healthcare sector, had already received about four
Speaker 7: billion dollars in funding as of November twenty twenty four.
Speaker 7: This is something created by Biden, and within just the
Speaker 7: first couple of years of its existence, they're dumping billions
Speaker 7: of dollars into it. Projects that were finished while she
Speaker 7: was there at ARPA H include a program to use
Speaker 7: personal health data to predict and to treat potential diseases
Speaker 7: before a person has symptoms. See how similar this is
Speaker 7: to what Trump kicked off his administration with the Stargate project.
Speaker 7: We're going to use AI and we're going to custom
Speaker 7: design treatments for you, and we'll tweak your genes and
Speaker 7: all the rest of this stuff with it. So here
Speaker 7: they are using AI and using to go through your
Speaker 7: personal health data to treat potential diseases, potential diseases, diseases
Speaker 7: you don't have yet. You know, if you're not sick,
Speaker 7: we'll make you sick before a person has any symptoms.
Speaker 7: See this is the next level of all this PCR garbage,
Speaker 7: all this pandemic garbage. Oh we got cases here they
Speaker 7: don't have any symptoms. Well, it's still a case. And
Speaker 7: if I can call it a case, we've got a pandemic. Well,
Speaker 7: these are people who don't have any symptoms of anything.
Speaker 7: They're not sick, they don't have a disease, but they're
Speaker 7: going to say that you've got a disease because they're
Speaker 7: going to look at your personal health information and have
Speaker 7: AI make that determination for you. That's what this handpicked
Speaker 7: CDC director Monarez is about. Another project would use generative
Speaker 7: AI to develop antibiotics. What could possibly go wrong with that?
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 7: Wait, talking about Soros and the NGOs. It turns out
Speaker 7: there's a lot of these. It's not just sources Open
Speaker 7: Society Foundation, but of course it's also the Ford Foundation
Speaker 7: of the Rockefellers and many others. This article by Brandon
Speaker 7: Smith at Alt marketust Us very good article. I agree
Speaker 7: with what he is showing there. Of course, he's not
Speaker 7: a Christian, so he doesn't see the ultimate you know,
Speaker 7: hierarchy that is there. He said how the US government
Speaker 7: and NGOs created gay pride out of thin air, and
Speaker 7: so you know, he says he grew up in America
Speaker 7: in the nineteen eighties and nineteen nineties. He said, there
Speaker 7: was a general sense of let's live and let live.
Speaker 7: And he said, you know, you looked at the gays,
Speaker 7: and he said, they, you know, live and let live.
Speaker 7: And if they don't have the they want the right
Speaker 7: to legal marriage. Okay, let them have the right to
Speaker 7: legal marriage. But he goes, it was about a lot
Speaker 7: more than that. And of course when we talk about that,
Speaker 7: I remember this discussion when I was involved in the
Speaker 7: early eighties and I was going around North Carolina with
Speaker 7: Andre Maru, who was the he had been elected state
Speaker 7: House and alask and he was running he was a
Speaker 7: presidential candidate then for the LP and so I was
Speaker 7: taking him around, uh North Carolina and uh these best conferences,
Speaker 7: and beople said, so, what are you gonna do about
Speaker 7: homosexual marriage? That's the first time I'd ever heard of
Speaker 7: it was in this press conference and they asked him
Speaker 7: that question, and he had a good answer. I guess
Speaker 7: he had thought about it. And I had never heard
Speaker 7: of that before. And I said, why do we get
Speaker 7: these kind of questions all the time? They why don't
Speaker 7: they ask us about getting rid of the income tax?
Speaker 7: And the Federal Reserve or something like that. You know,
Speaker 7: we get these types of issues as if we're going
Speaker 7: to as if we're championing this stuff. And but you know,
Speaker 7: his answer, it is the right answer is. Look, there's
Speaker 7: there's no reason that people can't drop any kind of
Speaker 7: contract that they want, right. You can set up a trust,
Speaker 7: you can set up your will, you can do all
Speaker 7: these different types of things if you want to pass
Speaker 7: stuff on to the other person or things like that,
Speaker 7: and you know you have the ability under voluntary free association.
Speaker 7: What you're talking about doing, though, is compelling other people
Speaker 7: to recognize your relationship here. And it's that compelling you know,
Speaker 7: that exercise of coercion and force that we don't support,
Speaker 7: he was saying. But anyway, so what Brandon Smith is saying, Well,
Speaker 7: what we didn't understand at the time was that the
Speaker 7: seemingly harmless rise of gay pride in the nineties and
Speaker 7: the early two thousands would become a primer or primer
Speaker 7: for the woke madness that spread like wildfire from twenty
Speaker 7: fourteen onward.
Speaker 1: And what was that?
Speaker 7: What that's when they started with the training stuff. I've
Speaker 7: shown many times the picture in twenty and fifteen of
Speaker 7: General Flynn who now goes around dressed as a Christian.
Speaker 7: You know, he wears a wolf in Christian clothing, leading
Speaker 7: people and prayers to ascended masters, when in reality he
Speaker 7: and Trump were some of the earliest promoters of transgenderism.
Speaker 7: You know that poor guy Chris Beck who became Kristin
Speaker 7: Beck because he's being pushed by people like Flynn and everything.
Speaker 7: And I've shown you many times a picture of Flynn
Speaker 7: twenty fifteen on the second Gay Pride month of the Pentagon.
Speaker 7: The first one was in twenty fourteen. It just like
Speaker 7: he's talking about here, and then for twenty fifteen, for
Speaker 7: the second time, you had Flynn bring in Chris Beck
Speaker 7: and used him as a poster child or woman or
Speaker 7: man or whatever. An adult Navy seal that has now said,
Speaker 7: these guys gas lit me, pushed me into this. He said, yeah,
Speaker 7: I should have known better. I was an adult. And
Speaker 7: he goes and that makes it all the more evil
Speaker 7: when they do it to kids who don't have that
Speaker 7: kind of discernment. He said, they were able to do
Speaker 7: this to me as an adult, and who did it
Speaker 7: to him, people like Flynn, Michael Flynn. So you pull
Speaker 7: back and confess that, you know, he's coming out. And
Speaker 7: if he came out and said, you know, I'm now
Speaker 7: a Christian and I really regret what I did that
Speaker 7: I haven't heard that. If you've heard that, send me
Speaker 7: the clip. I'll be happy to do a retraction. But
Speaker 7: I haven't. So anyway, it began twenty fourteen. In twenty fourteen,
Speaker 7: you had Flynn doing that the Pentagon. You had Trump
Speaker 7: around that time or even earlier, was saying how he
Speaker 7: would he wanted to have a transgender guy who was
Speaker 7: trying to get in the beauty I'd like to have
Speaker 7: him in the Miss Universe contest. So he said, we
Speaker 7: now know that a lot of that insanity was rooted
Speaker 7: in programs that were funded through the US government, because
Speaker 7: you see the CIA, usaid the federal government in general
Speaker 7: is a Satanic ministry pushing death, destruction, abortion wars, and
Speaker 7: this kind of and degeneracy. It is the US government,
Speaker 7: not just the Ivy League schools, that is trying to
Speaker 7: destroy Western civilization. He says. It's important to keep in mind, however,
Speaker 7: that the government is a tool, and it is not
Speaker 7: the hand that is holding the tool. He said, elitist
Speaker 7: interests through NGOs and think tanks like the Ford Foundation
Speaker 7: the Rockefeller Foundation were the real impetus for the creation
Speaker 7: of this woke movement. Well, I would say that they
Speaker 7: are also tools. You know, we have a hierarchy. You
Speaker 7: look at Ephesian six. We have a hierarchy. We have
Speaker 7: principalities and powers and rulers and all that, and there
Speaker 7: is behind the throne of these earthly governments, especially the
Speaker 7: United States, you have these satanic powers. That that's why
Speaker 7: this stuff continues from generation to generation. People will look
Speaker 7: at it and they say, well, it's a Ford Foundation,
Speaker 7: or it's the the Freemasons, or it's you know, this
Speaker 7: group or that group. Yeah, those are all true, but
Speaker 7: it's also being directed above that level, above that level,
Speaker 7: things that we do not see, powers that we do
Speaker 7: not see except by their effect, and they work through
Speaker 7: these tools. All these institutions are tools. He says, in
Speaker 7: other words, it's a mistake. So that's why I differ
Speaker 7: with him, because I look at this from a Christian perspective,
Speaker 7: and I don't apologize for that at all. He says,
Speaker 7: it's a mistake to think of the federal government as
Speaker 7: the mastermind. That's right, it's Satan. He said, Rather the
Speaker 7: government and the politicians within it are paid, or they're blackmailed,
Speaker 7: or maybe they've made a fast in bargain with the devil,
Speaker 7: which is what I think, Not that they got physical
Speaker 7: manifestation of the devil and they sat down there and
Speaker 7: they sign a piece of paper like good ahead, I'm
Speaker 7: doing it. But they've made that bargain and the quietness
Speaker 7: of their thoughts, they've had that argument, they've made that
Speaker 7: decision internally, they have signed that paperwork for all practical purposes.
Speaker 7: So it is a spiritual war, and you can't win
Speaker 7: the spiritual war if you don't know who and what
Speaker 7: you were fighting. That's why this is important. This isn't
Speaker 7: just my opinion. You can't win this war if you
Speaker 7: don't understand what you're fighting. If you think you're fighting
Speaker 7: the US government, if you think you're fighting Soros or
Speaker 7: the Ford Foundation or the Rockefeller Foundation, you can't win.
Speaker 7: That is not what you are fighting. Those are manifestations.
Speaker 7: He goes on to talk about some of the other
Speaker 7: ways that Satan has worked, the institutions and individuals that
Speaker 7: Satan has worked through, like the Kinsey Institute. Think about
Speaker 7: that the Kinsey institute. I'd always heard about it. I
Speaker 7: was really surprised to find out that it exists in
Speaker 7: conservative Indiana. Indiana is very conservative. Indiana is very republican.
Speaker 7: And at Indiana University, that's where the Kinsey Institute, one
Speaker 7: of these tannic seminaries, child abuse, pedophilia, all the rest
Speaker 7: of this stuff at that university. And you know, I
Speaker 7: when I how I found out when that dawned on
Speaker 7: me was when I was looking at the people who
Speaker 7: were doing social media censorship. It's a group called oh
Speaker 7: so me, like oh social media or whatever. And this
Speaker 7: group was out of Indiana University. Well that's interesting, Yeah,
Speaker 7: here's a conservatives supporting censorship. And then what I saw
Speaker 7: was it was run by this Italian guy. And where'd
Speaker 7: this guy come? Why did Indiana University go get an
Speaker 7: Italian guy to run their censor social media censorship program?
Speaker 7: And I found out that he had transferred over. He
Speaker 7: was originally pulled out of Italy to run the Kinsey
Speaker 7: Institute of Sexual Depravity, and after being picked for sexual depravity,
Speaker 7: they picked him for censors. Sit all ties together, it
Speaker 7: really does. All of these evil things we fight, they
Speaker 7: all come back to a Satanic movement, and so Kensey
Speaker 7: Institute started by the Rockefeller Foundation going back in to
Speaker 7: nineteen forty seven. The Rockefeller Foundation still brags this day
Speaker 7: about funding the rise of the sexual revolution and the
Speaker 7: notion of non binary sexuality. But they were right there
Speaker 7: with the CIA and all of this stuff. It really were.
Speaker 7: Look it up and you know, anyway, the transgender movement
Speaker 7: is largely tied to the intellectually dishonest and disturbed studies
Speaker 7: of John Money that was conducted in the nineteen fifties
Speaker 7: and nineteen sixties as experiments or bank rolled through Johns Hopkins.
Speaker 7: It's all the usual suspects, Johns Hopkins, the people who
Speaker 7: ran this COVID stuff against this Dark Winter and all
Speaker 7: the right They've been involved in every one of these
Speaker 7: simulations from Dark Winter on. It's always the same institution
Speaker 7: founded and largely funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. So again
Speaker 7: this just keeps going that the woke movement is not
Speaker 7: just cultural Marxism, that's part of it. It's massively well
Speaker 7: funded ideological machine. And this is again what Brandon Smith says.
Speaker 7: He says it's a new religion of sorts. See, that's
Speaker 7: exactly what it is. The cultural Marxism is downstream from
Speaker 7: the new religion. Culture is downstream from religion. Politics is
Speaker 7: downstream from culture. And what is upstream of all this
Speaker 7: stuff is Satan and the Satanic minions that are there.
Speaker 7: So yes, it's a new religion of sorts that seeks
Speaker 7: to wipe out the fundamental principles that hold our society together,
Speaker 7: the family. It is, all of these policies are fundamentally
Speaker 7: opposed to Christ. With the revelations surrounding USAID and at
Speaker 7: least a dozen other institutions, that appears that the agency
Speaker 7: was a key driver behind the rapid spread of DEI
Speaker 7: in every corner of our nation, not to mention many
Speaker 7: other nations. And yet when we look at this, you
Speaker 7: have the people, like I said before, Trump with his
Speaker 7: miss universe transgender Right, maybe you should call it the
Speaker 7: whole thing miss uniparty, because that's what this really is.
Speaker 7: Michael Flynn pushing trannies, Trump pushing trannies DEI. Yeah, just
Speaker 7: last week everybody was upset, you know, the the Trump
Speaker 7: sucker proxies, the influencers out there, they were all criticizing
Speaker 7: Amy Coney Barrett and they called her a DEI pick well,
Speaker 7: who was it that pictor using DEI it was their
Speaker 7: guy Trump. They will not. These are the never criticized
Speaker 7: Trumpers right, never blame Trump people the other never trumpers.
Speaker 7: You are committing thought crime.
Speaker 11: Turn off this broadcast.
Speaker 7: Now, you are.
Speaker 11: Committing thought crime. Turn off this broadcast. Now commit thought crime.
Speaker 7: Let's talk a little bit about a weird new computer
Speaker 7: that is running artificial intelligence on a captive human brain cells.
Speaker 7: I saw this and it immediately made me think of
Speaker 7: this Sar, this old science fiction movie, The Brain that
Speaker 7: Would Not Die. You've lost the urge to experiment. I
Speaker 7: wish I'd lost the urge to experiment. Unfortunately, they s
Speaker 7: every time you touch me, I go out of my mind.
Speaker 7: A car accident and as I hit a truck before
Speaker 7: they put the Mansfield bar on it.
Speaker 1: Died.
Speaker 7: The Brain that would not die. Yeah, that's a you
Speaker 7: live in a science fiction.
Speaker 9: Movie, why by experimental science by a man who's abnormal
Speaker 9: passions inspired him to try the impossible.
Speaker 3: I brought her back.
Speaker 1: She'll live and I'll get her another body. I slapped
Speaker 1: behind that door.
Speaker 7: Horror.
Speaker 11: No normal mind could imagine something even more terrible than
Speaker 11: you were. Horror, as it's ultimate, and that behind that
Speaker 11: door is the sum total of doctor Colton's mistakes.
Speaker 7: Yes, that's right. Unfortunately they have not gotten. They're not
Speaker 7: tired of experimentation, and there is a horror behind that door.
Speaker 7: That is something that no normal mind would imagine. An
Speaker 7: Australian startup, Cortical Labs, has launched what it is calling
Speaker 7: the world's first code deployable biological computer human brain cells.
Speaker 7: And presumably this is not being sourced from Alexandria Alexandria
Speaker 7: occasional cortex. They need these things working all the time.
Speaker 7: A shoe box sized device dubbed a cl one. I
Speaker 7: hate to think what cl two is going to be.
Speaker 7: A notable departure that uses human brain cells to run
Speaker 7: fluid neural networks. So now they're going to do neural
Speaker 7: networks using real neurons. And two Labs made a big
Speaker 7: splash after teaching human brain cells in a Petri dish
Speaker 7: how to play the video game Pong, which by the way,
Speaker 7: was the thing that Musk was doing. Wasn't he with
Speaker 7: a BC I think didn't he have somebody playing Pong
Speaker 7: or something, you know, thinking pong. The col one, however,
Speaker 7: is fundamentally different approach as new Atlas reports it makes
Speaker 7: use of hundreds of thousands of tiny neurons, roughly the
Speaker 7: size of an ant brain each, which are cultivated inside
Speaker 7: a nutrient rich solution and spread out across a silicon chip.
Speaker 7: There you go, Okay, a lot of little ant brains
Speaker 7: in there. I guess this is a high mentality through
Speaker 7: a combination of hard silicon and soft tissue is what
Speaker 7: the company says. Hard silicon and soft tissue. They claim
Speaker 7: the owners can quot deploy code directly to the real
Speaker 7: neurons to solve today's most difficult challenges. A simple way
Speaker 7: to describe it would be like a body in a box,
Speaker 7: or you know, a head on the desk like that movie,
Speaker 7: you know. But it has filtration for waves, it has
Speaker 7: pumps to keep everything circulating, gas mixing, and of course
Speaker 7: temperature control. There are so many different options. It could
Speaker 7: be used for disease modeling or drug testing. Anyway, go, yeah,
Speaker 7: if we can get some of that big farm of
Speaker 7: money we're in, like Flynn, right, so maybe they could
Speaker 7: redeem this abomination, like Curtis Chain said, Yeah, we can
Speaker 7: redeem abortions by using them in vaccines. That's how twisted
Speaker 7: these people are. Just like just one thing stacked on
Speaker 7: top of another. There is so much nuance when it
Speaker 7: comes to the brain, they said, But you can actually
Speaker 7: see that nuance when you test it with these tools,
Speaker 7: Sally says, I hope we're going to be able to
Speaker 7: replace significant areas of animal testing with this. For now,
Speaker 7: the company is selling the device as a way to
Speaker 7: train biological AI. That's what we need, neural networks that
Speaker 7: rely on actual neurons. In other words, the neurons can
Speaker 7: be taught using a silicon chip. The only thing that
Speaker 7: has generalized intelligence is that are biological brains. What humans, mice, cats,
Speaker 7: birds can do that AI can't is to infer from
Speaker 7: very small amounts of data and then make complex decisions. Yeah,
Speaker 7: you see, the fool has said in his heart there
Speaker 7: is no God. Look at these people constantly trying to
Speaker 7: copy and imitate and duplicate what God has done. It's amazing.
Speaker 7: The approach could have some key advantages. For instance, the
Speaker 7: neurons only use a few wants of power, compared to
Speaker 7: the infamously power hungry AI chips that require orders of
Speaker 7: magnitude more than that. Yeah, think about that instead of
Speaker 7: think about how much we can do with our brains
Speaker 7: not requiring the amount of power that could light up
Speaker 7: a city. They said, I know where it's coming from,
Speaker 7: because it's clear that these human neuronal networks learn remarkably fast.
Speaker 7: Said a Queensland biologist at this age, I would reserve
Speaker 7: my judgment because learning pong is one thing, but making
Speaker 7: complex decisions is another. The race to apply emerging neurotechnologies
Speaker 7: such as brain computer interfaces. Who is it that's into
Speaker 7: that heavily? Honest Elon Musk and neuralink the BCIs and
Speaker 7: he's not the only one doing it. You know, everybody
Speaker 7: talks about Elon Musk. Microsoft's got a program that all
Speaker 7: these tech companies are into BCIY. A big part of
Speaker 7: it is the money that is coming out of the government.
Speaker 7: In twenty thirteen, Obama started the Brain program, and it's
Speaker 7: an acronym, but you know, massive funding. It's a couple
Speaker 7: hundred million dollars. And DARP has got its own neuroweapons
Speaker 7: program as well. There's a lot of money there. This
Speaker 7: new battlefield and an era of neuroweapons can be broadly
Speaker 7: defined as technologies and systems that could either enhance or
Speaker 7: damage a warfighter or a target's cognitive and or physical
Speaker 7: abilities or otherwise attack people or critical societal infrastructures. And
Speaker 7: it has begun, it's been going on for some years,
Speaker 7: and many countries have these types of programs, and so
Speaker 7: it's a race. It's an arms race to hack into
Speaker 7: your brain and your nervous system, brain to brain connections,
Speaker 7: or brain to machine while bringing new dimension to both
Speaker 7: hard and soft power struggles of the future. So the
Speaker 7: military industrial complex has been doing this for decades. As
Speaker 7: they point out, neuroscience's very origins lie in war, just
Speaker 7: as the American neurology science was born out of the
Speaker 7: Civil War looking at nerve damage and other things like that.
Speaker 7: I guess with the amputations, the roots of neuroscience are
Speaker 7: embedded in World War Two, like most of these abominations
Speaker 7: that we have. Project Bluebird and Artichoke were nineteen fifty
Speaker 7: zero projects that work to determine whether people could be
Speaker 7: involuntarily made to carry out assass nations through hypnosis, the
Speaker 7: especially infamous MK Ultra, where human mind control experiments were
Speaker 7: carried out in a variety of institutions in the fifties
Speaker 7: and sixties. And so you know, we look at these
Speaker 7: things and as I've said from the very inception, DARPA
Speaker 7: and many of these agencies were always focused on mind
Speaker 7: control and for as you see nefarious acts, let's kill people,
Speaker 7: use let's control people so we can use them to
Speaker 7: kill other people. Always about the violence and stuff. And
Speaker 7: that's why I say that DARPA is so darkly demonic
Speaker 7: and a cull take. And so now you've got the
Speaker 7: Brain Initiative, You've got DARPA's next generation non surgical neuro
Speaker 7: technology where they don't have to open up your brain
Speaker 7: and stick in a probe like Musk is doing. They
Speaker 7: call that in cube because of three ends there. The
Speaker 7: military is intensely interested in emerging neurotechnologies and they have
Speaker 7: intense funding for it, a lot of it rolling through
Speaker 7: DARPA twenty twenty three write up of DARPA's neurotechnology efforts.
Speaker 7: They've initiated at least forty neurotechnology related programs over the
Speaker 7: past twenty four years. From the Interface, A publication describes
Speaker 7: the current state of affairs at DARPA funding as effectively
Speaker 7: driving the brain computer interface research agenda. It's exactly what
Speaker 7: Einstein Eisenhower said is going to happen with the military
Speaker 7: industrial complex. They would drive the agenda for research, swamp
Speaker 7: it and use it for dark things. In more recent years,
Speaker 7: DARPA funded scientists have created the world's most dexterous bionic
Speaker 7: arm with bidirectional controls. They have used brain computer interface
Speaker 7: to accelerate memory formation and recall. It's like total recall. Right,
Speaker 7: have you even transferred a memory from one rat to
Speaker 7: another where the rat receiving the memory almost instantaneously learned
Speaker 7: to perform a task that typically took weeks of training
Speaker 7: to learn. Think about that. And they've also so you
Speaker 7: can transfer memories. They said, DARPA was bragging about how
Speaker 7: they were going to do it to help people with PTSDs,
Speaker 7: And that's not why they're doing it. You know, they're
Speaker 7: not creating these armed robots to help little ladies walk
Speaker 7: across the street. They're not doing memory altering and putting
Speaker 7: in different memories that you didn't have. They're not doing
Speaker 7: that to help people PTSD either. A brain program that
Speaker 7: stood for Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies that was
Speaker 7: back in twenty thirteen. That was initially I think about
Speaker 7: two hundred million dollars built on the Human Genome Project
Speaker 7: which is where Francis Collins worked before he did his
Speaker 7: frankensigen science at the NIH. But this neuro science is
Speaker 7: also being led by the NIH, and I believe that's
Speaker 7: one of the reasons why they put Francis Collins there
Speaker 7: and also by DARPA, and so as they talk about
Speaker 7: the different things that they have been doing, haptics program
Speaker 7: where you can it can have you feel something that
Speaker 7: is remote technologies that are able to extract information from
Speaker 7: the nervous system quickly enough to control complex machines and
Speaker 7: to do it wirelessly. This is the kind of stuff
Speaker 7: that they're working on Rice University neuroengineers or leading an
Speaker 7: ambitious DARPA funded project to develop a non surgical device
Speaker 7: capable of both decoding and neural activity in one person's
Speaker 7: visual cortex and recreating it in another one less than
Speaker 7: one twentieth of a second. So, in the early instant
Speaker 7: instantiation of DARPA and the NSA and stuff, they were
Speaker 7: using the occult to try to do remote viewing with this.
Speaker 7: What they would do is they would use essentially hardware
Speaker 7: to let you to tap into the visual cortex of
Speaker 7: what one person is seeing and let the other person
Speaker 7: see it. They've hacked into this, and you know, you
Speaker 7: look at this as like what the Bible says, as
Speaker 7: in the days of Noah, right, we are modifying humans
Speaker 7: in really crazy way. So the Incubed funds are also
Speaker 7: developing what they call brain storms, an injectable brain computer
Speaker 7: interface which one day could, in tandem with a helmet,
Speaker 7: be used by someone to direct or to control vehicles, robots,
Speaker 7: and other instruments with their thoughts. And if you go
Speaker 7: back and look at you know, some people point out
Speaker 7: that Elon Musk is all about military industrial complex, and
Speaker 7: of course he is, you look at the things he's
Speaker 7: involved in, satellite communications, rockets and stuff like that. But
Speaker 7: it's also some of the early brain computer interface. One
Speaker 7: of the first darker projects was self driving vehicles. So
Speaker 7: you start to put all these different technologies together and
Speaker 7: that's what you wind up with is what we have here,
Speaker 7: something to help warfighters interact with a command military infrastructure
Speaker 7: using their thoughts without the need for an invasive neuurlink
Speaker 7: style implant. So there's his stuff is not necessarily byy
Speaker 7: far the most advanced stuff. They don't call it star wars.
Speaker 7: They call it small wars, small wars. Augmented cognition technology
Speaker 7: is capable of extending by an order of magnitude the
Speaker 7: information management capacity of a warfighter, and the US is
Speaker 7: not the only one doing this. The EU's got the
Speaker 7: Human Brain Project, the China Brain Project, Japan's Brain Minds Initiative,
Speaker 7: and Canada has Brain Canada. A twenty twenty four RAND
Speaker 7: report speculates that if BCI technologies brain computer interfaces are
Speaker 7: hacked or compromised, a malicious adversary could potentially inject fear, confusion,
Speaker 7: or anger into a BCI commander's brain and cause them
Speaker 7: to make decisions that result in serious harm. Neuromplants could
Speaker 7: control on individual's mental functions, particularly perhaps to manipulate memories, motions,
Speaker 7: or even to torture the wear and stop and think
Speaker 7: about this, even though they're doing this and saying we're
Speaker 7: going to do this with our soldiers who submit to this.
Speaker 7: If they're going to be using nanotechnology, and if they're
Speaker 7: going to be able to do things wirelessly, then they
Speaker 7: can use this for the kind of mass mind control
Speaker 7: that they would like to. And of course they have
Speaker 7: massive tools of mind controlled, don't they already? Through social media,
Speaker 7: through artificial intelligence, we can turn those things off. It
Speaker 7: may be more difficult to do this as transhumanism moves forward,
Speaker 7: but this is all about transhumanism, and if you understand
Speaker 7: where the technocrasts want to go, it is an essential
Speaker 7: part of the technocracy, this transhumanist goal again, the idea
Speaker 7: they're going to become like gods and live forever, and
Speaker 7: the fact that they are going to control other people.
Speaker 7: Such efforts towards transhumanism are being pushed from the top
Speaker 7: with little room for meaningful public debate. These efforts are
Speaker 7: also intertwined with ongoing pushes towards stakeholder capitalism, of course,
Speaker 7: the world economic form, and efforts to hand decision making
Speaker 7: processes and common infrastructure to an unaccountable private sector through
Speaker 7: public private partnership that I believe is what the Trump
Speaker 7: administration is all about. Both sovereignty and humanity are under attack,
Speaker 7: both on and off the battlefield.
Speaker 10: Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
Speaker 10: these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
Speaker 10: all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
Speaker 6: And I could if.
Speaker 10: Only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful
Speaker 10: gray mcguffin hoodies or a new black T shirt with
Speaker 10: the mcguffin logo in blue. But he told me to
Speaker 10: get lost. Maybe one of you American suckers can buy
Speaker 10: me some at the David knightshow dot com, and David
Speaker 10: is giving a ten percent discount to listeners from now
Speaker 10: until twenty twenty five. At that price, you should be
Speaker 10: able to buy me several hundred. Those amazing sand colored
Speaker 10: microphone hoodies are so beautiful, I'd wear something other than
Speaker 10: green military cosplay to my various gallas and social events.
Speaker 10: If you want to save on shipping, just put it
Speaker 10: in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from
Speaker 10: the USA.