WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.040 --> 00:00:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Today, I want to tell you about a journey that

2
00:00:01.600 --> 00:00:03.879
<v Speaker 1>I've been on for most of my life. Ever since

3
00:00:03.919 --> 00:00:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid, I've heard tales of bigfoot and

4
00:00:05.839 --> 00:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>wild men while spending time with my friends and family.

5
00:00:09.039 --> 00:00:11.439
<v Speaker 1>As I grew older and read more about the paranormal,

6
00:00:11.599 --> 00:00:14.679
<v Speaker 1>my interest in encryptids and other things strange only deepened.

7
00:00:15.240 --> 00:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm so excited to share with you what

8
00:00:17.199 --> 00:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I've personally become involved with the Untold Radio Network. The

9
00:00:21.719 --> 00:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Untold Radio Network is a live streaming podcast network that

10
00:00:25.359 --> 00:00:29.359
<v Speaker 1>airs a new show every day across all podcast platforms, YouTube,

11
00:00:29.359 --> 00:00:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and more. They have eight different shows on all sorts

12
00:00:32.159 --> 00:00:36.119
<v Speaker 1>of exciting topics such as bigfoot, cryptids, UFOs, aliens, and

13
00:00:36.200 --> 00:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>much more. I even have my own show called Weird Encounters,

14
00:00:39.479 --> 00:00:42.439
<v Speaker 1>where I talk about all things strange. This is more

15
00:00:42.479 --> 00:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>than just a podcast network. It's a community that allows

16
00:00:45.320 --> 00:00:47.759
<v Speaker 1>me to meet so many amazing people who share their

17
00:00:47.799 --> 00:00:51.520
<v Speaker 1>stories and experiences with strange. If you're interested in hearing

18
00:00:51.520 --> 00:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>more of these stories and learning more about the paranormal

19
00:00:53.960 --> 00:00:56.679
<v Speaker 1>and encryptids, make sure you check out the Untold Radio

20
00:00:56.759 --> 00:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Network for all kinds of exciting shows. It's free to subscribe.

21
00:01:00.679 --> 00:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>So what are you waiting for visit www dot untold

22
00:01:04.519 --> 00:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>radionetwork dot com today.

23
00:01:06.760 --> 00:01:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Now, what are your reporting? I got a screen going

24
00:01:09.719 --> 00:01:12.120
<v Speaker 2>on here. Something just kid with my dog, something to

25
00:01:12.200 --> 00:01:15.280
<v Speaker 2>kill your dog? My dog. We're flying through there, over

26
00:01:15.319 --> 00:01:20.079
<v Speaker 2>the tree. I don't know how it did it? Okay, damn,

27
00:01:20.159 --> 00:01:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm really confused. All I saw was my dog coming

28
00:01:22.680 --> 00:01:24.480
<v Speaker 2>over the fence, and name was dead once you hit

29
00:01:24.519 --> 00:01:26.560
<v Speaker 2>the grill. I didn't see any cars. All I saw

30
00:01:26.680 --> 00:01:28.000
<v Speaker 2>was my dog coming over the fence.

31
00:01:44.400 --> 00:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Happen?

32
00:01:44.920 --> 00:01:48.000
<v Speaker 2>What are you reporting? We got some wonder or something

33
00:01:49.319 --> 00:01:58.640
<v Speaker 2>crawling around out here? Did you see what it was?

34
00:01:58.400 --> 00:02:01.040
<v Speaker 2>It was enough out here. Look, I'm new to one

35
00:02:01.079 --> 00:02:02.760
<v Speaker 2>doow now and I don't need anything. I don't want

36
00:02:02.799 --> 00:02:12.159
<v Speaker 2>to go outside. Hello, hit the boddy out here? What quin?

37
00:02:12.240 --> 00:02:15.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm out there? I've thought of a mention about text nine.

38
00:02:15.240 --> 00:02:18.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know easy annount there. Yeah, I'm walking right heady.

39
00:02:19.360 --> 00:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Before we get into today's episode, I just want to

40
00:02:21.680 --> 00:02:23.759
<v Speaker 1>take a moment to talk about what this show is

41
00:02:23.840 --> 00:02:27.199
<v Speaker 1>all about. If you've been listening for a while, you

42
00:02:27.240 --> 00:02:30.159
<v Speaker 1>know that I have a deep interest in the sasquatch phenomenon,

43
00:02:30.840 --> 00:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>not just in the encounter stories. Themselves, but in the

44
00:02:33.719 --> 00:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>bigger picture, I try to bring different perspectives to the table,

45
00:02:37.840 --> 00:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it's through first hand accounts, interviews, or exploring theories,

46
00:02:42.439 --> 00:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>research and historical cases. Every Friday is and will always

47
00:02:47.319 --> 00:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>be dedicated to an encounter based interview with someone who

48
00:02:50.520 --> 00:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>has experienced something extraordinary. These personal stories are the heart

49
00:02:55.319 --> 00:02:57.319
<v Speaker 1>of the show, and I know they're what many of

50
00:02:57.360 --> 00:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you come here for. But in addition to those interviews,

51
00:03:00.560 --> 00:03:05.159
<v Speaker 1>I also do these Wednesday Wisdom episodes where I share articles, ideas,

52
00:03:05.159 --> 00:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and information related to Sasquatch. It's a way to dive

53
00:03:09.159 --> 00:03:12.479
<v Speaker 1>deeper into the subject and explore aspects of the phenomenon

54
00:03:12.759 --> 00:03:16.479
<v Speaker 1>that go beyond individual encounters. My hope is that you

55
00:03:16.599 --> 00:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>enjoy these episodes and that they add value to your

56
00:03:19.680 --> 00:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>experience as a listener. Ultimately, this show is and will

57
00:03:24.000 --> 00:03:28.479
<v Speaker 1>always be about you, the listener. Your feedback is the

58
00:03:28.520 --> 00:03:31.639
<v Speaker 1>most important thing, so please let me know what you

59
00:03:31.719 --> 00:03:35.159
<v Speaker 1>think about the show as a whole, about these bonus

60
00:03:35.199 --> 00:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>episodes like Wednesday Wisdom, and about the narrated stories I share.

61
00:03:40.120 --> 00:03:43.039
<v Speaker 1>Your thoughts help shape the direction of the podcast, and

62
00:03:43.120 --> 00:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I truly appreciate every comment, suggestion, and review, so please

63
00:03:48.000 --> 00:03:52.199
<v Speaker 1>send me an email at brianat Paranormalworldproductions dot com and

64
00:03:52.280 --> 00:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>let me know what you think about this episode and

65
00:03:54.439 --> 00:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the show in general. You can also reach me via

66
00:03:57.520 --> 00:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>voicemail using the Leavis of Voicemail button right here in

67
00:04:00.840 --> 00:04:04.879
<v Speaker 1>the show notes. Remember, if you're listening on Apple Podcasts,

68
00:04:05.120 --> 00:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you can not only rate the show, but you can

69
00:04:07.319 --> 00:04:11.439
<v Speaker 1>also write a review. And finally, if you're listening on Spotify,

70
00:04:11.800 --> 00:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you can rate the show and you can also comment

71
00:04:14.360 --> 00:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>on each individual episode. No matter how you choose to

72
00:04:17.879 --> 00:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>do it, please reach out and let me know your thoughts.

73
00:04:21.600 --> 00:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Legends are not born overnight. They do not simply appear

74
00:04:25.319 --> 00:04:29.079
<v Speaker 1>fully formed in the minds of the people who tell them. Rather,

75
00:04:29.399 --> 00:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>they emerge from centuries of whispered stories, pass down from

76
00:04:33.240 --> 00:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>one generation to the next. They take root in the

77
00:04:36.199 --> 00:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>deep forests and the shadowed corners of human history, where

78
00:04:39.720 --> 00:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>mystery still lingers. Some legends stay confined within the cultures

79
00:04:44.160 --> 00:04:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that birth them, shared only in the quiet moments around

80
00:04:47.519 --> 00:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a fire, while others find their way into the larger world,

81
00:04:51.639 --> 00:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>growing and evolving until they take on a life of

82
00:04:53.959 --> 00:04:57.399
<v Speaker 1>their own. This is the story of one such legend,

83
00:04:57.839 --> 00:05:01.759
<v Speaker 1>the Tale of Sasquatch. That has become synonymous with North

84
00:05:01.800 --> 00:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>America's most enduring cryptid. But the creature that we call

85
00:05:05.639 --> 00:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Sasquatch today was not always known by that name. Long

86
00:05:09.839 --> 00:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>before newspaper headlines and television documentaries, long before blurry photographs

87
00:05:14.600 --> 00:05:19.199
<v Speaker 1>and controversial footprints, there was Saskeats, the mysterious being of

88
00:05:19.240 --> 00:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the Shahalis people of British Columbia. The legend of Saskeats

89
00:05:23.920 --> 00:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>was more than just folklore. For the indigenous peoples who

90
00:05:27.160 --> 00:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>lived along the winding rivers and towering forests of the

91
00:05:30.160 --> 00:05:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Pacific Northwest. This being was part of their reality, a

92
00:05:34.439 --> 00:05:36.959
<v Speaker 1>presence as real as the bears and the elk that

93
00:05:37.079 --> 00:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>shared their land. The Shahalis described a large, powerful, hair

94
00:05:41.639 --> 00:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>covered figure that walked upright like a man, but lived

95
00:05:44.800 --> 00:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in the remote wilderness, rarely seen except by those who

96
00:05:48.439 --> 00:05:52.439
<v Speaker 1>ventured deep into its domain. Unlike the fearsome monsters of

97
00:05:52.480 --> 00:05:57.439
<v Speaker 1>European folklore, Saskets was not necessarily malevolent. It was a guardian,

98
00:05:57.959 --> 00:06:00.879
<v Speaker 1>a keeper of the land, a creature that existed in

99
00:06:00.920 --> 00:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a world just beyond human reach. But how did this figure,

100
00:06:05.079 --> 00:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>once known only to the indigenous peoples of the Pacific

101
00:06:07.800 --> 00:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Northwest become one of the most famous cryptids in the world.

102
00:06:12.199 --> 00:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>How did the word saskets transform into sasquatch, a name

103
00:06:16.319 --> 00:06:20.319
<v Speaker 1>recognized across continents, and how did the study of creatures

104
00:06:20.360 --> 00:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>like sasquatch give birth to an entirely new field of

105
00:06:23.240 --> 00:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>research known as cryptozoology. To answer these questions, we must

106
00:06:28.240 --> 00:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>begin with the man who first brought sasquatch into the

107
00:06:30.839 --> 00:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>public eye, a Canadian teacher and Indian agent named J. W. Burns.

108
00:06:36.399 --> 00:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>John William Burns was no ordinary teacher. In the early

109
00:06:39.759 --> 00:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, he took a position as a school teacher

110
00:06:42.560 --> 00:06:45.759
<v Speaker 1>at the shah Halis First Nation Reserve in British Columbia,

111
00:06:46.199 --> 00:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a community primarily made up of the Shahalis people. But

112
00:06:49.759 --> 00:06:52.879
<v Speaker 1>unlike many other white officials at the time, Burns did

113
00:06:52.879 --> 00:06:55.959
<v Speaker 1>not see the indigenous people as subjects to be civilized

114
00:06:56.360 --> 00:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>or assimilated. Instead, he listened. The Shalis people shared with

115
00:07:01.720 --> 00:07:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Burns their history, their traditions, and their stories, among them

116
00:07:06.639 --> 00:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the tales of Saskets, the mysterious wild man that lived

117
00:07:11.079 --> 00:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in the forests and mountains. Burns quickly realized that nearly

118
00:07:15.040 --> 00:07:17.399
<v Speaker 1>everyone in the community had a story to tell about

119
00:07:17.399 --> 00:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the creature. Some described hearing its eerie cries in the night,

120
00:07:21.560 --> 00:07:24.199
<v Speaker 1>while others told of footprints left in the mud along

121
00:07:24.319 --> 00:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>riverbanks far too large to belong to any known animal.

122
00:07:28.600 --> 00:07:30.839
<v Speaker 1>A few had even claimed to have seen the towering

123
00:07:30.879 --> 00:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>figure itself, its dark eyes watching from the trees, before

124
00:07:34.560 --> 00:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>vanishing into the wilderness. As Burns began documenting these stories,

125
00:07:39.120 --> 00:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to share them with a wider audience. However,

126
00:07:42.199 --> 00:07:45.959
<v Speaker 1>he encountered a challenge. The hal kame Limb language in

127
00:07:46.040 --> 00:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>which saskets was spoken was largely unwritten at the time,

128
00:07:50.279 --> 00:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and English speaker struggled with its pronunciation. As he transcribed

129
00:07:54.639 --> 00:07:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the word into English, a spelling error occurred, leading to

130
00:07:58.480 --> 00:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the creation of a new word, sasquatch. This small mistake,

131
00:08:03.560 --> 00:08:07.199
<v Speaker 1>one slight change in pronunciation, would forever alter the way

132
00:08:07.240 --> 00:08:10.519
<v Speaker 1>the world knew the creature, but at the time, neither

133
00:08:10.560 --> 00:08:13.519
<v Speaker 1>Burns nor the Shahalis people could have imagined the global

134
00:08:13.560 --> 00:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>impact this misspelling would eventually have. In nineteen twenty nine,

135
00:08:17.959 --> 00:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Burns published an article in McLean's magazine titled Introducing British

136
00:08:22.279 --> 00:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Columbia's Hairy Giants, in which he described the many eyewitness

137
00:08:26.360 --> 00:08:30.439
<v Speaker 1>accounts he had gathered. Unlike earlier reports, of wild men

138
00:08:30.480 --> 00:08:33.519
<v Speaker 1>in North America, many of which were dismissed as hoaxes

139
00:08:33.639 --> 00:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>or tall tales. Burne's article treated the subject with seriousness

140
00:08:37.600 --> 00:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and respect. This was a turning point in Sasquatch history. Suddenly,

141
00:08:42.799 --> 00:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the legend of the hairy giants was not just an

142
00:08:45.279 --> 00:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>indigenous tradition. It was a scientific mystery, a puzzle waiting

143
00:08:50.120 --> 00:08:55.399
<v Speaker 1>to be solved. Inspired by Burne's work, more newspaper reporters, explorers,

144
00:08:55.399 --> 00:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and amateur investigators began seeking out evidence of sasquatch in

145
00:08:59.279 --> 00:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>the wild. While Burns himself never considered sasquatch a mere myth,

146
00:09:04.200 --> 00:09:06.879
<v Speaker 1>his work would lay the foundation for something even bigger,

147
00:09:07.399 --> 00:09:12.039
<v Speaker 1>the birth of cryptozoology. Cryptozoology is the study of animals

148
00:09:12.039 --> 00:09:15.159
<v Speaker 1>that have not been confirmed to exist by mainstream science.

149
00:09:15.919 --> 00:09:20.679
<v Speaker 1>These creatures, called cryptids, include both legendary beings like Bigfoot

150
00:09:20.960 --> 00:09:23.759
<v Speaker 1>and the locknous monster, as well as animals thought to

151
00:09:23.759 --> 00:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>be extinct, like the thylacine Tasmanian tiger. But cryptozoology is

152
00:09:29.639 --> 00:09:34.159
<v Speaker 1>not just about chasing myths. Many species once dismissed as folklore,

153
00:09:34.559 --> 00:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>such as the gorilla, the celacanth, and the giant squid,

154
00:09:38.440 --> 00:09:42.639
<v Speaker 1>were eventually proven to be real. This has led cryptozoologists

155
00:09:42.639 --> 00:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to believe that creatures like sasquatch may also be based

156
00:09:45.639 --> 00:09:50.639
<v Speaker 1>on real undiscovered animals. The word cryptozoology was first used

157
00:09:50.639 --> 00:09:54.799
<v Speaker 1>by Bernard Hoovelmans, a Belgian French zoologist, in his nineteen

158
00:09:54.879 --> 00:09:59.279
<v Speaker 1>fifty five book On the Track of Unknown Animals. Hooflmans

159
00:09:59.279 --> 00:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>believe that science should not ignore legends, folklore, or eyewitness accounts,

160
00:10:03.960 --> 00:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>as they could provide clues to real hidden species. But

161
00:10:07.799 --> 00:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Houfelman's was not the first to study cryptids. Before him,

162
00:10:11.480 --> 00:10:15.279
<v Speaker 1>researchers like Charles Fort and Ivan T. Sanderson had already

163
00:10:15.320 --> 00:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>laid the groundwork for cryptozoology by collecting thousands of accounts

164
00:10:19.480 --> 00:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of mysterious creatures. Born in eighteen seventy four, Charles Hoy

165
00:10:23.759 --> 00:10:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Fort was a writer and researcher who dedicated his life

166
00:10:26.759 --> 00:10:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to collecting reports of unexplained phenomena. Fort's work was wide ranging,

167
00:10:31.679 --> 00:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>covering topics such as UFO sightings before UFOs were a

168
00:10:35.279 --> 00:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>known concept, strange disappearances, mysterious lights, and aerial phenomena, out

169
00:10:42.000 --> 00:10:45.279
<v Speaker 1>of place animals such as kangaroos appearing in North America,

170
00:10:46.120 --> 00:10:51.399
<v Speaker 1>reports of unknown humanoids, including early bigfoot sightings, Fort's belief

171
00:10:51.440 --> 00:10:55.799
<v Speaker 1>was simple scientific institutions were too quick to dismiss unusual data.

172
00:10:56.399 --> 00:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>He argued that there were too many strange, unexplained events

173
00:10:59.440 --> 00:11:03.399
<v Speaker 1>in history for all of them to be hoaxes or misidentifications.

174
00:11:04.000 --> 00:11:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Although Fort never used the term cryptozoology, his books, including

175
00:11:08.399 --> 00:11:11.919
<v Speaker 1>The Book of the Damned, published in nineteen nineteen, compiled

176
00:11:12.000 --> 00:11:16.039
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of strange reports that later cryptozoologists would use as

177
00:11:16.080 --> 00:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>reference points. Many of the earliest bigfoot reports in American

178
00:11:20.279 --> 00:11:24.159
<v Speaker 1>newspapers were first compiled by Fort, decades before the term

179
00:11:24.279 --> 00:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>sasquatch became popular. His influence is still seen today in

180
00:11:28.519 --> 00:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>modern paranormal and cryptid research. Born in nineteen eleven, Ivan

181
00:11:33.600 --> 00:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Terrence Sanderson was a British zoologist, explorer, and one of

182
00:11:37.639 --> 00:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the first cryptozoologists to take bigfoot seriously. He traveled to

183
00:11:42.159 --> 00:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Africa and South America in search of unknown animals, documenting

184
00:11:46.240 --> 00:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>real species that had never before been studied in the West.

185
00:11:50.120 --> 00:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>In the nineteen fifties, Sanderson investigated Yeti sidings in the Himalayas,

186
00:11:55.000 --> 00:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>collecting footprints and interviewing locals. He was among the first

187
00:11:59.039 --> 00:12:02.279
<v Speaker 1>to propose that sas squatch, the Yetti and other wild

188
00:12:02.399 --> 00:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>men around the world were related species. In nineteen sixty one,

189
00:12:07.320 --> 00:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Sanderson published Abominable Snowmen Legend Come to Life, one of

190
00:12:11.879 --> 00:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the first serious books on sasquatch and similar cryptids worldwide.

191
00:12:16.639 --> 00:12:20.919
<v Speaker 1>His work influenced modern bigfoot researchers, including Grover Krantz and

192
00:12:21.039 --> 00:12:26.279
<v Speaker 1>John Green, and helped establish sasquatch as a legitimate cryptozoological mystery.

193
00:12:27.039 --> 00:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Cryptozoology has evolved significantly since its formalization in the nineteen fifties.

194
00:12:32.559 --> 00:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Each decade has brought new discoveries, theories, controversies, and technological

195
00:12:37.519 --> 00:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>advancements that have shaped how the world perceived sasquatch and

196
00:12:41.039 --> 00:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>other cryptids. This is a brief but detailed exploration of

197
00:12:45.159 --> 00:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>how cryptozoology has developed over the years, from early field

198
00:12:49.279 --> 00:12:53.519
<v Speaker 1>investigations to the modern use of DNA analysis and artificial

199
00:12:53.519 --> 00:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>intelligence in cryptid research. The nineteen fifties were a pivotal

200
00:12:58.120 --> 00:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>time for cryptozoology. Before this period, mysterious creatures were primarily

201
00:13:03.399 --> 00:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>relegated to folklore, myth and occasional newspaper articles. But as

202
00:13:08.360 --> 00:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Bernard Hoovelman's introduced cryptozoology as a legitimate field of study,

203
00:13:13.039 --> 00:13:16.519
<v Speaker 1>researchers and the public alike began paying closer attention to

204
00:13:16.639 --> 00:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>reports of undiscovered animals, especially sasquatch. In nineteen fifty five,

205
00:13:22.440 --> 00:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>The Birth of Cryptozoology, Bernard Hoovelman's published On the Track

206
00:13:26.440 --> 00:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of Unknown Animals, coining the term cryptozoology and arguing that

207
00:13:30.639 --> 00:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>folklore and eyewitness reports could be valuable tools for zoological discovery.

208
00:13:35.960 --> 00:13:39.919
<v Speaker 1>Hoovelman's book introduced the idea that many mythical creatures might

209
00:13:39.960 --> 00:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>be real animals awaiting discovery. In nineteen fifty eight, the

210
00:13:44.519 --> 00:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>discovery of the Bigfoot name. In Humboldt County, California, a

211
00:13:49.000 --> 00:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>construction worker named Jerry Crue discovered enormous footprints in the

212
00:13:52.919 --> 00:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>mud at a work site. The local newspaper, The Humboldt Times,

213
00:13:57.399 --> 00:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>published the story, referring to the creature as Bigfoot. This

214
00:14:02.200 --> 00:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>was the first recorded use of the name Bigfoot, which

215
00:14:05.159 --> 00:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>quickly gained popularity across North America. The footprints were later

216
00:14:09.639 --> 00:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>revealed to have been faked by Ray Wallace, a local prankster. However,

217
00:14:14.720 --> 00:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the legend had already taken hold, and many researchers believed

218
00:14:18.320 --> 00:14:22.039
<v Speaker 1>the footprints were similar to others found long before Wallace's prank.

219
00:14:23.000 --> 00:14:26.399
<v Speaker 1>The nineteen fifties saw the first attempts at serious field

220
00:14:26.519 --> 00:14:31.039
<v Speaker 1>research into cryptids, with researchers and journalists conducting interviews with

221
00:14:31.120 --> 00:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>indigenous peoples and logging bigfoot sightings in the Pacific Northwest.

222
00:14:36.679 --> 00:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>With the term bigfoot now firmly established, the nineteen sixties

223
00:14:40.799 --> 00:14:45.559
<v Speaker 1>saw a surge in cryptozoological research, particularly focused on wild

224
00:14:45.639 --> 00:14:50.559
<v Speaker 1>hominids like Sasquatch and the Yetti, the supposed abominable snowman

225
00:14:50.919 --> 00:14:55.679
<v Speaker 1>of the Himalayas. In nineteen sixty one, Ivan T. Sanderson

226
00:14:56.600 --> 00:15:01.159
<v Speaker 1>publishes Abominable Snowman Legend Come to Life. This book was

227
00:15:01.159 --> 00:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the first comprehensive studies of wild men around

228
00:15:04.200 --> 00:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the world, from the Sasquatch of North America to the

229
00:15:07.600 --> 00:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Yetie of Tibet. Sanderson proposed that these creatures could be

230
00:15:11.720 --> 00:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>relic hominids, surviving members of ancient species such as Gigantopithecus.

231
00:15:17.799 --> 00:15:20.559
<v Speaker 1>The most famous piece of sasquatch evidence was captured on

232
00:15:20.600 --> 00:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>October twentieth, nineteen sixty seven, in Bluff Creek, California. Roger

233
00:15:25.240 --> 00:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Patterson and Bob Gimlin filmed a large, hair covered bipedal

234
00:15:28.480 --> 00:15:32.399
<v Speaker 1>figure striding across a riverbed. The footage remains one of

235
00:15:32.440 --> 00:15:36.039
<v Speaker 1>the most debated and analyzed pieces of cryptid evidence in history.

236
00:15:36.639 --> 00:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Some believe it to be a real Sasquatch, while skeptics

237
00:15:39.840 --> 00:15:43.279
<v Speaker 1>argue it was a man in a suit. Despite attempts

238
00:15:43.279 --> 00:15:46.039
<v Speaker 1>to debunk it, no one has conclusively proven how the

239
00:15:46.080 --> 00:15:49.759
<v Speaker 1>film was made if it was a hoax. Throughout the decade,

240
00:15:49.879 --> 00:15:54.159
<v Speaker 1>researchers began organizing expeditions into the Pacific Northwest in search

241
00:15:54.200 --> 00:15:59.399
<v Speaker 1>of Bigfoot. Reports of footprints, strange vocalizations, and fleeting sightings

242
00:15:59.440 --> 00:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>fueled public interest in cryptids. By the nineteen seventies, cryptozoology

243
00:16:04.759 --> 00:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>had begun to capture the public's imagination. The rise of television, documentaries, books,

244
00:16:10.559 --> 00:16:16.039
<v Speaker 1>and media coverage made Sasquatch and other cryptids household names.

245
00:16:16.080 --> 00:16:20.279
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen seventy four, the first scientific Bigfoot research project,

246
00:16:21.279 --> 00:16:25.399
<v Speaker 1>The North American Science Institute, launched an official Bigfoot research project,

247
00:16:25.919 --> 00:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>using scientific methodology to analyze footprints and sightings. Zoologist Grover

248
00:16:31.519 --> 00:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Krantz became one of the first academics to publicly support

249
00:16:34.759 --> 00:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the idea that Sasquatch could be real. He argued that

250
00:16:38.279 --> 00:16:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Sasquatch might be a descendant of Gigantipithecus, a prehistoric ape

251
00:16:42.639 --> 00:16:46.399
<v Speaker 1>that once lived in Asia. In nineteen seventy six, the

252
00:16:46.480 --> 00:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>FBI analyzed supposed bigfoot hair samples at the request of cryptozoologists.

253
00:16:51.799 --> 00:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>The results the hair was found to belong to a deer,

254
00:16:55.480 --> 00:16:58.039
<v Speaker 1>but the fact that the FBI was willing to investigate

255
00:16:58.080 --> 00:17:03.159
<v Speaker 1>it all gave credibility to Sasquat research. Stay tuned for

256
00:17:03.200 --> 00:17:05.559
<v Speaker 1>more Sasquatch ott to see. We'll be right back. After

257
00:17:05.640 --> 00:17:12.799
<v Speaker 1>these messages, the nineteen seventies saw a flood of Bigfoot

258
00:17:12.839 --> 00:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>related books, documentaries, and films, including the cult classic The

259
00:17:17.440 --> 00:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Legend of Boggy Creek nineteen seventy two, which dramatized Bigfoot

260
00:17:21.960 --> 00:17:27.559
<v Speaker 1>encounters in Arkansas. As technology improved, cryptozoologists began using better

261
00:17:27.599 --> 00:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>tools to investigate cryptid sidings. Infrared cameras, audio recording equipment,

262
00:17:33.400 --> 00:17:37.839
<v Speaker 1>and motion sensors were deployed in the field. Nineteen eighty

263
00:17:38.240 --> 00:17:43.759
<v Speaker 1>the rise of the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization BFRO. BFRO

264
00:17:44.000 --> 00:17:47.759
<v Speaker 1>became the leading group for documenting sasquatch sidings and conducting

265
00:17:47.799 --> 00:17:52.279
<v Speaker 1>field investigations. In nineteen eighty two, we have the discovery

266
00:17:52.279 --> 00:17:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Skukum cast, a partial body impression believed to

267
00:17:56.160 --> 00:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>belong to a sasquatch was discovered in Washington State. The

268
00:18:00.799 --> 00:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>cast showed what some researchers claimed were primate like dermal ridges.

269
00:18:05.640 --> 00:18:08.799
<v Speaker 1>As I wrote about extensively in my book, Sasquatch unleashed

270
00:18:09.160 --> 00:18:13.839
<v Speaker 1>the truth behind the legend. Through the years, cryptozoology gains recognition,

271
00:18:13.920 --> 00:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and pop culture shows like Unsolved Mysteries and in Search

272
00:18:17.720 --> 00:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of frequently covered Bigfoot and other cryptids, increasing public awareness.

273
00:18:23.640 --> 00:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>By the nineteen nineties and two thousands, advances in DNA

274
00:18:27.160 --> 00:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>analysis and Internet communication changed cryptozoology. Researchers could now share

275
00:18:32.960 --> 00:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>reports instantly, and scientists could test cryptid evidence in ways

276
00:18:37.039 --> 00:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>never before possible. As nineteen ninety five rolls in the

277
00:18:41.240 --> 00:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Internet fuels cryptid investigations. Websites and forums dedicated to Bigfoot

278
00:18:46.519 --> 00:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>research allowed researchers to share sightings, photos, and theories globally.

279
00:18:52.039 --> 00:18:55.079
<v Speaker 1>As we entered the two thousands, first attempts at DNA

280
00:18:55.119 --> 00:18:59.519
<v Speaker 1>analysis arrives on the scene, hair and tissue samples purported

281
00:18:59.519 --> 00:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to belong to Bigfoot were tested. Most results were inconclusive

282
00:19:03.759 --> 00:19:07.599
<v Speaker 1>or identified as known animals, but the potential for forensic

283
00:19:07.599 --> 00:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>cryptozoology had begun. Two thousand and eight gave US the

284
00:19:12.200 --> 00:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Bigfoot hoax. Two men claimed they had a frozen

285
00:19:15.680 --> 00:19:18.680
<v Speaker 1>bigfoot body, which turned out to be a rubber costume.

286
00:19:19.480 --> 00:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>This hoax damaged the credibility of serious researchers. Today, cryptozoologists

287
00:19:24.839 --> 00:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>use cutting edge technology in their search for creatures like sasquatch.

288
00:19:29.319 --> 00:19:31.599
<v Speaker 1>Over the last few years, we have seen drones and

289
00:19:31.680 --> 00:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>AI powered wildlife monitoring sweep through the world of cryptid research.

290
00:19:36.920 --> 00:19:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Researchers now use thermal imaging drones to scan remote forests

291
00:19:41.079 --> 00:19:45.519
<v Speaker 1>for evidence of large primates. In twenty twenty two, the

292
00:19:45.559 --> 00:19:50.279
<v Speaker 1>Lockness EDNA project led to scientists tested environmental DNA or

293
00:19:50.920 --> 00:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>EDNA in lock nest to search for unknown species. This

294
00:19:55.039 --> 00:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>technique could one day be used in sasquatch investigations. Cryptozoology

295
00:19:59.839 --> 00:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>had come a long way since J. W. Burns first

296
00:20:02.359 --> 00:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>wrote about sasquatch. Whether science will one day confirm its

297
00:20:06.400 --> 00:20:11.400
<v Speaker 1>existence remains to be seen, but the search continues. Legends

298
00:20:11.440 --> 00:20:15.839
<v Speaker 1>often fade with time as civilizations advance. Old myths and

299
00:20:15.880 --> 00:20:20.599
<v Speaker 1>folklore are cast aside, replaced by the certainty of scientific discovery.

300
00:20:21.359 --> 00:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>But some stories refuse to disappear. Some mysteries, no matter

301
00:20:25.160 --> 00:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>how thoroughly examined continue to haunt the human imagination. Sasquatch

302
00:20:30.319 --> 00:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>is one such mystery. From the mist covered mountains of

303
00:20:33.279 --> 00:20:36.640
<v Speaker 1>British Columbia to the dense forests of the Pacific Northwest,

304
00:20:37.119 --> 00:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>from the rugged wilderness of Alaska to the rolling hills

305
00:20:40.240 --> 00:20:45.039
<v Speaker 1>of the Appalachian Mountains, the legend of Sasquatch endures. What

306
00:20:45.160 --> 00:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>began as an oral tradition among the Shayless people has

307
00:20:48.200 --> 00:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>become a global phenomenon, its name known in every corner

308
00:20:51.960 --> 00:20:56.559
<v Speaker 1>of the world, and yet, despite decades of research, expeditions,

309
00:20:56.680 --> 00:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and technological advancements, the question remains un ABIs answered. Is

310
00:21:01.200 --> 00:21:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Sasquatch real? J. W. Burns, in his early writings, may

311
00:21:05.680 --> 00:21:08.279
<v Speaker 1>not have intended to ignite one of the greatest unsolved

312
00:21:08.319 --> 00:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>mysteries of modern times. He was a storyteller, a man

313
00:21:12.039 --> 00:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>who valued the voices of the indigenous people he worked

314
00:21:14.720 --> 00:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>with and sought to share their stories with a broader audience.

315
00:21:18.039 --> 00:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>In doing so, he gave the world a name, Sasquatch,

316
00:21:21.799 --> 00:21:24.039
<v Speaker 1>and set in motion a search that has lasted for

317
00:21:24.119 --> 00:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>nearly a century. Over the years, cryptozoology has expanded beyond

318
00:21:29.000 --> 00:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the study of Sasquatch to include creatures from every part

319
00:21:32.400 --> 00:21:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of the world. From lake monsters to undiscovered primates to

320
00:21:36.279 --> 00:21:42.599
<v Speaker 1>prehistoric survivors. The field has evolved alongside scientific advancements, embracing

321
00:21:42.640 --> 00:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>new technologies like DNA analysis, drone surveillance, and artificial intelligence.

322
00:21:48.720 --> 00:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>But even with all these tools at their disposal, researchers

323
00:21:52.000 --> 00:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>still lack definitive proof of Sasquatch's existence. For every blurry photograph,

324
00:21:57.440 --> 00:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>for every plaster cast of a footprint, every eyewitness account,

325
00:22:01.799 --> 00:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>skeptics remain unconvinced. They argue that the lack of a body,

326
00:22:06.400 --> 00:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>clear video evidence, or fossil record suggests that Sasquatch is

327
00:22:10.160 --> 00:22:15.079
<v Speaker 1>nothing more than a cultural myth, perpetuated by misidentifications, hoaxes,

328
00:22:15.279 --> 00:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and wishful thinking. But if Sasquatch is merely a legend,

329
00:22:19.359 --> 00:22:23.079
<v Speaker 1>why does the legend persist? Why after thousands of reported

330
00:22:23.119 --> 00:22:27.640
<v Speaker 1>sightings across North America does the story refuse to fade.

331
00:22:27.759 --> 00:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps the truth lies not just in scientific evidence, but

332
00:22:31.039 --> 00:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in the human need for mystery. Sasquatch represents something more

333
00:22:35.039 --> 00:22:38.079
<v Speaker 1>than just an elusive primate. It is a symbol of

334
00:22:38.119 --> 00:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the wild, a reminder that, even in an age of

335
00:22:41.039 --> 00:22:46.039
<v Speaker 1>satellites and smartphones, the world still holds secrets. The idea

336
00:22:46.079 --> 00:22:50.039
<v Speaker 1>that a large, intelligent, undiscovered creature could still exist beyond

337
00:22:50.119 --> 00:22:54.319
<v Speaker 1>the reach of human civilization is both terrifying and exhilarating.

338
00:22:55.039 --> 00:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>It challenges our understanding of nature and forces us to

339
00:22:58.240 --> 00:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>consider the limits of what we truly need know, And

340
00:23:01.279 --> 00:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>so the search continues. Even today. In the dark forests

341
00:23:05.720 --> 00:23:08.519
<v Speaker 1>of North America, there are those who venture out in

342
00:23:08.559 --> 00:23:10.759
<v Speaker 1>the hope of catching a glimpse of the creature that

343
00:23:10.799 --> 00:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>has captivated humanity for centuries, Whether armed with trail cameras,

344
00:23:15.599 --> 00:23:19.759
<v Speaker 1>thermal imaging drones, or just a deep curiosity. Modern Sasquatch

345
00:23:19.880 --> 00:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>researchers are carrying on a tradition that began long before J. W.

346
00:23:23.599 --> 00:23:28.039
<v Speaker 1>Burns first wrote about the Saskets. Perhaps one day science

347
00:23:28.039 --> 00:23:32.200
<v Speaker 1>will uncover the truth about Sasquatch, Perhaps a definitive discovery

348
00:23:32.240 --> 00:23:35.039
<v Speaker 1>will be made and the world will finally have an answer.

349
00:23:35.839 --> 00:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Or perhaps, as with all great legends, the mystery will

350
00:23:39.440 --> 00:23:42.799
<v Speaker 1>remain just beyond our grasp, waiting in the shadows of

351
00:23:42.839 --> 00:23:47.039
<v Speaker 1>the wilderness, just as it always has. The story of

352
00:23:47.119 --> 00:23:50.039
<v Speaker 1>Sasquatch is as much about history and folklore as it

353
00:23:50.119 --> 00:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>is about ongoing investigation and analysis. From the earliest indigenous

354
00:23:55.039 --> 00:23:58.359
<v Speaker 1>oral traditions to the work of pioneers like J. W. Burns,

355
00:23:58.759 --> 00:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Charles Fort, and I Ivan T. Sanderson. The legend of

356
00:24:02.200 --> 00:24:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a large, elusive, human like creature has endured through the ages,

357
00:24:06.519 --> 00:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>but today sasquatch is no longer confined to stories whispered

358
00:24:10.279 --> 00:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>around campfires or the speculative writings of early cryptozoologists. It

359
00:24:15.680 --> 00:24:19.920
<v Speaker 1>has evolved into a subject of serious inquiry, attracting researchers,

360
00:24:20.039 --> 00:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>data analysts, and even forensic scientists who are determined to

361
00:24:23.519 --> 00:24:28.519
<v Speaker 1>separate fact from fiction. For decades, those fascinated by sasquatch

362
00:24:28.519 --> 00:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>have relied on eyewitness accounts, footprint casts, and the occasional

363
00:24:33.039 --> 00:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>blurry photograph or video as their primary sources of evidence. However,

364
00:24:38.000 --> 00:24:41.519
<v Speaker 1>as the field of cryptozoology has advanced, so too have

365
00:24:41.599 --> 00:24:45.599
<v Speaker 1>the methods used to study these elusive creatures. Gone are

366
00:24:45.599 --> 00:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the days when a single sighting would define an entire theory. Today,

367
00:24:50.000 --> 00:24:54.319
<v Speaker 1>we have access to large scale databases, statistical analysis, and

368
00:24:54.400 --> 00:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>even artificial intelligence tools that allow us to recognize patterns

369
00:24:58.359 --> 00:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and trends in sasquatch in count in ways that early

370
00:25:01.519 --> 00:25:05.759
<v Speaker 1>researchers could only dream of. This shift in methodology is

371
00:25:05.759 --> 00:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>what led to a recent discussion I had with Neil,

372
00:25:08.759 --> 00:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a dedicated researcher based in the United Kingdom who has

373
00:25:12.000 --> 00:25:15.839
<v Speaker 1>taken a data driven approach to investigating the sasquatch phenomenon.

374
00:25:16.720 --> 00:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Neil's work is not based on a handful of anecdotal

375
00:25:19.440 --> 00:25:24.319
<v Speaker 1>reports or gut feelings. Instead, he has meticulously analyzed over

376
00:25:24.400 --> 00:25:29.279
<v Speaker 1>five thousand sasquatch reports from various regions, looking for patterns

377
00:25:29.279 --> 00:25:33.559
<v Speaker 1>that might provide clues about the creature's habits, movement, and behavior.

378
00:25:34.359 --> 00:25:38.119
<v Speaker 1>His goal to determine whether there is a statistical foundation

379
00:25:38.240 --> 00:25:42.160
<v Speaker 1>for the sightings, something tangible that could help separate credible

380
00:25:42.160 --> 00:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>reports from misidentifications and hoaxes. During our conversation, Neil shared

381
00:25:47.519 --> 00:25:50.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the most fascinating trends and anomalies that emerged

382
00:25:50.680 --> 00:25:54.640
<v Speaker 1>from his analysis. Some of these patterns confirmed long standing

383
00:25:54.680 --> 00:25:59.559
<v Speaker 1>beliefs about sasquatch, while others challenged conventional wisdom, raising new

384
00:25:59.640 --> 00:26:03.559
<v Speaker 1>questions about how and where these creatures might exist. What

385
00:26:03.680 --> 00:26:06.599
<v Speaker 1>Neil discovered might change the way we think about sasquatch

386
00:26:06.720 --> 00:26:10.400
<v Speaker 1>encounters and possibly even provide new leads in the search

387
00:26:10.440 --> 00:26:14.559
<v Speaker 1>for definitive proof. Our conversation touched on everything from the

388
00:26:14.599 --> 00:26:18.519
<v Speaker 1>classifications of sidings to the behaviors and conditions most often

389
00:26:18.519 --> 00:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>associated with encounters. Today, I'll be sharing highlights from that

390
00:26:23.000 --> 00:26:27.759
<v Speaker 1>discussion and exploring how human perception, environmental factors, and even

391
00:26:27.799 --> 00:26:32.279
<v Speaker 1>cultural phenomena shape the way we interpret these reports. One

392
00:26:32.279 --> 00:26:35.839
<v Speaker 1>of the most intriguing aspects of the BFRO database is

393
00:26:35.880 --> 00:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>its classification system, which ranks sidings by their perceived credibility

394
00:26:40.440 --> 00:26:45.039
<v Speaker 1>and detail Class A, Class B, and Class C. While

395
00:26:45.079 --> 00:26:48.839
<v Speaker 1>these categories are invaluable for organizing the data, they also

396
00:26:48.920 --> 00:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>reveal interesting insights into how human perception and external factors

397
00:26:53.160 --> 00:26:57.400
<v Speaker 1>influence what witnesses report. Class A sidings are those where

398
00:26:57.480 --> 00:27:01.680
<v Speaker 1>witnesses report seeing bigfoot up close in detail and with

399
00:27:01.799 --> 00:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>minimal ambiguity. These are truly the gold standard and the

400
00:27:06.039 --> 00:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>most compelling cases, often including descriptions of the creature's size, color, movement,

401
00:27:11.920 --> 00:27:16.559
<v Speaker 1>and facial features. For example, one organ resident observed a tall,

402
00:27:16.599 --> 00:27:20.519
<v Speaker 1>black haired creature drinking from a stream. In another instance,

403
00:27:20.720 --> 00:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a New York woman reported seeing a large, hairy figure

404
00:27:23.799 --> 00:27:28.279
<v Speaker 1>walk past her bedroom window during daylight hours. However, even

405
00:27:28.319 --> 00:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>these detailed reports can be influenced by psychological factors. Confirmation

406
00:27:33.519 --> 00:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>bias plays a significant role if a person already believes

407
00:27:37.240 --> 00:27:40.759
<v Speaker 1>in Bigfoot, they might interpret ambiguous shapes or sounds as

408
00:27:40.799 --> 00:27:44.799
<v Speaker 1>evidence of the creature. Similarly, the sheer, size and rarity

409
00:27:44.839 --> 00:27:49.519
<v Speaker 1>of bigfoot sightings can trigger emotional responses fear, awe, or

410
00:27:49.559 --> 00:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>excitement that may exaggerate or distort what the witness remembers. Finally,

411
00:27:55.480 --> 00:27:59.160
<v Speaker 1>cultural saturation through movies, TV shows, and social media could

412
00:27:59.160 --> 00:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>shape what people cold to, leading them to unconsciously fill

413
00:28:03.160 --> 00:28:07.599
<v Speaker 1>in the blanks based on preconceived ideas. Class B sightings

414
00:28:07.640 --> 00:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>involve encounters where Bigfoot is not clearly seen, but indirect

415
00:28:11.200 --> 00:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>evidence strongly suggests its presence. Examples include hearing wood knocks,

416
00:28:16.440 --> 00:28:20.839
<v Speaker 1>spotting footprints, or catching glimpses of a shadowy figure. One

417
00:28:20.920 --> 00:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>notable case comes from campers in Oregon who heard loud screams,

418
00:28:24.720 --> 00:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>found bite marks on their camp table, and observed tree

419
00:28:27.680 --> 00:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>shaking in the distance. While these encounters are compelling, they're

420
00:28:31.720 --> 00:28:37.200
<v Speaker 1>also more prone to misinterpretation. Animal behavior, whether phenomena or

421
00:28:37.240 --> 00:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>even human hoaxes, could explain many of these occurrences. For instance,

422
00:28:42.039 --> 00:28:45.119
<v Speaker 1>a bear's growls or woodpecker activity might be mistaken for

423
00:28:45.160 --> 00:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Bigfoot's distinctive sounds. Additionally, psychological factors like Heightened fear and

424
00:28:50.960 --> 00:28:55.799
<v Speaker 1>isolated environments can amplify a person's sense of unease, making

425
00:28:55.839 --> 00:28:59.279
<v Speaker 1>them more likely to interpret ambiguous sounds or movements as

426
00:28:59.279 --> 00:29:03.519
<v Speaker 1>something extraord ordinary. Class C sightings are the least reliable,

427
00:29:03.920 --> 00:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>often based on second hand accounts or lacking sufficient detail

428
00:29:07.440 --> 00:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to draw conclusions. For example, fishermen in Ohio found small,

429
00:29:12.200 --> 00:29:15.519
<v Speaker 1>barefoot human like tracks near the river, but never saw

430
00:29:15.559 --> 00:29:19.519
<v Speaker 1>the creature. While intriguing, such reports are more vulnerable to

431
00:29:19.559 --> 00:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>skepticism due to their lack of direct observation. Class C

432
00:29:24.079 --> 00:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>sightings also highlight the challenges of human perception. People may

433
00:29:28.240 --> 00:29:31.279
<v Speaker 1>interpret vague evidence in ways that align with their beliefs

434
00:29:31.319 --> 00:29:35.319
<v Speaker 1>or fears, and social influences can further distort the truth.

435
00:29:36.000 --> 00:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Mental health factors like paranoia or hallucinations, while rare, could

436
00:29:40.480 --> 00:29:45.119
<v Speaker 1>also play a role in certain cases. Importantly, cultural fascination

437
00:29:45.200 --> 00:29:48.559
<v Speaker 1>with bigfoot can sometimes create a phenomenon where people want

438
00:29:48.559 --> 00:29:51.759
<v Speaker 1>to see or believe in the creature, leading to embellished

439
00:29:51.880 --> 00:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>or even fabricated reports. Neil's analysis revealed consistent patterns and

440
00:29:57.279 --> 00:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>reported bigfoot behavior and physical traits. Witnesses frequently describe loud vocalizations,

441
00:30:04.039 --> 00:30:08.279
<v Speaker 1>large footprints, and sightings of a massive bipedal creature with dark,

442
00:30:08.319 --> 00:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>shaggy hair. Let's delve into how these reports compare to

443
00:30:12.000 --> 00:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>other known animals and explore additional behaviors unique to Bigfoot encounters.

444
00:30:17.400 --> 00:30:21.559
<v Speaker 1>The screams, howls, and growls attributed to Bigfoot are often

445
00:30:21.599 --> 00:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>described as powerful and unlike any known animal. While wolves, coyotes,

446
00:30:26.640 --> 00:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and even foxes produce eerie calls that could be mistaken

447
00:30:30.039 --> 00:30:35.359
<v Speaker 1>for something supernatural, Bigfoot vocalizations are often reported as deeper, louder,

448
00:30:35.640 --> 00:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and more resonant. Some witnesses compare them to primate calls,

449
00:30:39.960 --> 00:30:44.039
<v Speaker 1>which adds an interesting parallel. Apes and guerrillas use loud

450
00:30:44.079 --> 00:30:49.559
<v Speaker 1>vocalizations to communicate, warn others, or establish dominance, behaviors that

451
00:30:49.640 --> 00:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>align with Bigfoot's supposed territorial nature. One of the most

452
00:30:54.000 --> 00:30:56.839
<v Speaker 1>compelling pieces of evidence comes in the form of footprints,

453
00:30:57.319 --> 00:31:01.599
<v Speaker 1>typically fourteen to sixteen inches long. These tracks often show

454
00:31:01.680 --> 00:31:05.039
<v Speaker 1>dermal ridges, a level of detail that's difficult to fake,

455
00:31:06.000 --> 00:31:10.039
<v Speaker 1>While bears or large humans could leave similar impressions, The size,

456
00:31:10.240 --> 00:31:14.799
<v Speaker 1>stride length, and toe configuration reported in Bigfoot tracts often

457
00:31:14.880 --> 00:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>deviate from these known species. Interestingly, other animals like gorillas

458
00:31:20.240 --> 00:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>or Chimpanzees also leave distinctive tracts in their habitats, but

459
00:31:24.240 --> 00:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>these are much smaller and less pronounced. This raises the

460
00:31:28.000 --> 00:31:31.839
<v Speaker 1>question if Bigfoot is real, is it an undiscovered primate

461
00:31:32.160 --> 00:31:34.359
<v Speaker 1>or could it be a relic population of a now

462
00:31:34.400 --> 00:31:39.799
<v Speaker 1>extinct hominid such as Gigantopithecus. Bigfoot is frequently described as

463
00:31:39.799 --> 00:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a bipedal creature, standing seven to ten feet tall, covered

464
00:31:43.440 --> 00:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>in dark brown or black hair, with broad shoulders and

465
00:31:46.680 --> 00:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a muscular build. This description aligns with no known species,

466
00:31:51.200 --> 00:31:56.119
<v Speaker 1>but bears striking similarities to large apes. However, witnesses also

467
00:31:56.200 --> 00:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>report subtle human like features, deep set eyes, a pre

468
00:32:00.000 --> 00:32:03.759
<v Speaker 1>renounced brow ridge, and a flattened nose, which blur the

469
00:32:03.799 --> 00:32:08.319
<v Speaker 1>line between animal and man. Reports often include behaviors like

470
00:32:08.359 --> 00:32:12.039
<v Speaker 1>tree knocking, which witnesses interpret as a form of communication.

471
00:32:13.000 --> 00:32:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Other notable behaviors include stone throwing, following humans at a distance,

472
00:32:17.839 --> 00:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and peering from behind trees. These actions suggest curiosity, intelligence,

473
00:32:23.640 --> 00:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and even a playful or defensive nature, While certain animals

474
00:32:27.720 --> 00:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>such as primates and even birds like crows, exhibit tool

475
00:32:31.359 --> 00:32:34.799
<v Speaker 1>use and strategic behaviors. The combination of these traits in

476
00:32:34.839 --> 00:32:39.519
<v Speaker 1>Bigfoot reports sets it apart. Some witnesses also report more

477
00:32:39.599 --> 00:32:43.519
<v Speaker 1>unusual phenomena, such as glowing red eyes or the ability

478
00:32:43.559 --> 00:32:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to move silently despite its size. These characteristics remain controversial

479
00:32:48.720 --> 00:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>as they lack scientific parallels and often veer into the

480
00:32:52.200 --> 00:32:56.279
<v Speaker 1>realm of folklore. A strong foul odour, described as a

481
00:32:56.279 --> 00:33:01.519
<v Speaker 1>mix of wet animal and decaying matter, is another common detail. Interestingly,

482
00:33:01.839 --> 00:33:05.759
<v Speaker 1>similar odors are associated with gorillas, which produce a musky

483
00:33:05.880 --> 00:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>scent when agitated or threatened. This parallel could lend credibility

484
00:33:10.039 --> 00:33:12.799
<v Speaker 1>to the idea that Bigfoot uses scent as a form

485
00:33:12.839 --> 00:33:17.759
<v Speaker 1>of intimidation. Many reported Bigfoot behaviors aligned with those of primates.

486
00:33:18.200 --> 00:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>For example, gorillas beat their chests and use loud vocalizations

487
00:33:22.480 --> 00:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to assert dominance or ward off threats, much like bigfoots

488
00:33:26.440 --> 00:33:30.319
<v Speaker 1>reported tree knocking and howls. Primates are known to use

489
00:33:30.319 --> 00:33:33.799
<v Speaker 1>sticks and stones, a behavior echoed in reports of Bigfoot

490
00:33:33.799 --> 00:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>throwing rocks or manipulating objects. Most primates are highly cautious

491
00:33:38.880 --> 00:33:42.559
<v Speaker 1>around humans, preferring to retreat or observe from a distance,

492
00:33:43.000 --> 00:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>similar to Bigfoot's elusive nature. Yet there are behaviors that

493
00:33:46.960 --> 00:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>remain unique or unexplained, such as the alleged glowing eyes

494
00:33:51.599 --> 00:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>or the ability to remain undetected for long periods. These

495
00:33:55.720 --> 00:33:58.599
<v Speaker 1>elements keep the mystery alive in fuel debate over whether

496
00:33:58.640 --> 00:34:02.119
<v Speaker 1>Bigfoot is a flesh and blood creature, a myth, or

497
00:34:02.160 --> 00:34:07.279
<v Speaker 1>something more complex. Neil's data analysis offers a fascinating glimpse

498
00:34:07.319 --> 00:34:11.280
<v Speaker 1>into the world of Bigfoot sidings. By comparing these reports

499
00:34:11.280 --> 00:34:15.119
<v Speaker 1>to known animal behaviors and considering the psychological and cultural

500
00:34:15.119 --> 00:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>factors at play, we gain a deeper understanding of both

501
00:34:18.400 --> 00:34:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the phenomenon and the people reporting it. While the mystery persists,

502
00:34:22.960 --> 00:34:26.760
<v Speaker 1>one thing is clear. Bigfoot occupies a unique space in

503
00:34:26.800 --> 00:34:31.280
<v Speaker 1>both nature and our imaginations. Whether it's an undiscovered species

504
00:34:31.639 --> 00:34:34.679
<v Speaker 1>or a reflection of our collective fascination with the unknown,

505
00:34:35.000 --> 00:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the search for Bigfoot continues to captivate and inspire. If

506
00:34:39.000 --> 00:34:42.159
<v Speaker 1>you enjoyed this exploration and haven't already heard it, don't

507
00:34:42.159 --> 00:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>forget to check out my full interview with Neil for

508
00:34:44.480 --> 00:34:49.559
<v Speaker 1>even more insights. The legend of Sasquatch has evolved over centuries,

509
00:34:49.880 --> 00:34:53.599
<v Speaker 1>with early Indigenous oral traditions and folklore contributing to the

510
00:34:53.599 --> 00:34:59.280
<v Speaker 1>creature's mystique. Over time, this cryptid entered popular nomenclature, largely

511
00:34:59.360 --> 00:35:03.119
<v Speaker 1>due to media coverage, sensationalized reports, and the work of

512
00:35:03.199 --> 00:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>organizations like the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization BFRO, which has

513
00:35:08.320 --> 00:35:12.880
<v Speaker 1>cataloged thousands of alleged encounters. While these accounts have provided

514
00:35:12.920 --> 00:35:16.719
<v Speaker 1>a compelling case for the persistent belief in bigfoot, skeptics

515
00:35:16.840 --> 00:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>argue that anecdotal reports alone are insufficient to establish the

516
00:35:20.920 --> 00:35:26.079
<v Speaker 1>creature's existence. With an extensive history of sightings, footprint discoveries,

517
00:35:26.079 --> 00:35:31.159
<v Speaker 1>and reported encounters, the debate surrounding Sasquatch has persisted, fueled

518
00:35:31.199 --> 00:35:36.639
<v Speaker 1>by both scientific inquiry and public fascination. But beyond eyewitness

519
00:35:36.679 --> 00:35:41.039
<v Speaker 1>accounts in folklore, what tangible evidence exists to substantiate the

520
00:35:41.079 --> 00:35:45.119
<v Speaker 1>claim that Sasquatch is real? How have researchers and skeptics

521
00:35:45.119 --> 00:35:49.400
<v Speaker 1>alike analyzed this evidence. One notable discussion on this topic

522
00:35:49.400 --> 00:35:53.079
<v Speaker 1>appears in an article from The Skeptical Inquirer written by

523
00:35:53.079 --> 00:35:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Michael R. Dinnett titled Bigfoot Evidence? Are These Tracks? Real?

524
00:35:59.079 --> 00:36:02.039
<v Speaker 1>In his article, Dinnett examines one of the most widely

525
00:36:02.119 --> 00:36:06.880
<v Speaker 1>cited forms of bigfoot evidence, footprint discoveries, and explores whether

526
00:36:06.920 --> 00:36:10.159
<v Speaker 1>they provide legitimate proof or are merely the product of

527
00:36:10.199 --> 00:36:14.760
<v Speaker 1>hoaxes and misinterpretations. His work offers a critical look at

528
00:36:14.800 --> 00:36:18.119
<v Speaker 1>how proponents like Grover Krantz have used footprint evidence to

529
00:36:18.119 --> 00:36:22.480
<v Speaker 1>support their claims, while also shedding light on the arguments

530
00:36:22.480 --> 00:36:27.239
<v Speaker 1>of those who refute such findings. Within the bigfoot research community,

531
00:36:27.400 --> 00:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Krantz has both staunch supporters and vocal critics. One of

532
00:36:31.039 --> 00:36:34.079
<v Speaker 1>his main opponents is Renee To Hindon, a well known

533
00:36:34.119 --> 00:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>sasquatch researcher. Dehindon takes particular issue with Krantz's endorsement of

534
00:36:38.960 --> 00:36:41.679
<v Speaker 1>a set of tracks discovered in the Mill Creek Watershed

535
00:36:41.760 --> 00:36:45.639
<v Speaker 1>in Oregon's Blue Mountains, which Krantz considers among the best

536
00:36:45.719 --> 00:36:50.840
<v Speaker 1>evidence for sasquatch. Dehindon, however, dismisses them outright as fakes,

537
00:36:51.159 --> 00:36:54.519
<v Speaker 1>stating any village idiot can see the Mill Creek tracks

538
00:36:54.599 --> 00:36:59.119
<v Speaker 1>or fake one hundred percent fake, and stay tuned for

539
00:36:59.159 --> 00:37:01.519
<v Speaker 1>more sasquatch to see what we'll be right back after

540
00:37:01.599 --> 00:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>these messages. The debate ultimately centers around Krantz's unwavering belief

541
00:37:09.440 --> 00:37:13.519
<v Speaker 1>in his ability to discern genuine evidence from hoaxes. In

542
00:37:13.559 --> 00:37:17.039
<v Speaker 1>a nineteen ninety two television interview, Krantz explained that his

543
00:37:17.119 --> 00:37:19.880
<v Speaker 1>belief in sasquatch was initially sparked when he saw a

544
00:37:19.920 --> 00:37:22.639
<v Speaker 1>pair of footprints in the wild that appeared to belong

545
00:37:22.719 --> 00:37:26.199
<v Speaker 1>to a large, heavy, and crippled creature. He claimed that

546
00:37:26.239 --> 00:37:28.320
<v Speaker 1>if someone had faked them, they would need to be

547
00:37:28.360 --> 00:37:33.679
<v Speaker 1>an anatomical genius rivaling Leonardo da Vinci, which he deemed impossible.

548
00:37:34.400 --> 00:37:37.599
<v Speaker 1>Controversy has long been a hallmark of bigfoot research, and

549
00:37:37.679 --> 00:37:39.880
<v Speaker 1>few figures have been as central to the debate as

550
00:37:39.920 --> 00:37:44.079
<v Speaker 1>Grover Krantz, an associate professor of anthropology at Washington State

551
00:37:44.199 --> 00:37:49.760
<v Speaker 1>University in Pullman. Kranz's book Bigfootprints, A Scientific Inquiry into

552
00:37:49.760 --> 00:37:53.679
<v Speaker 1>the Reality of Sasquatch, and his television appearances continue to

553
00:37:53.679 --> 00:37:57.920
<v Speaker 1>fuel the ongoing debate surrounding the creature's existence. One of

554
00:37:57.920 --> 00:38:01.159
<v Speaker 1>the more contentious aspects of Krantz's work is his call

555
00:38:01.239 --> 00:38:05.360
<v Speaker 1>for obtaining a sasquatch specimen, dead or alive. He has

556
00:38:05.400 --> 00:38:08.639
<v Speaker 1>been quoted as advising hunters to retrieve the largest possible

557
00:38:08.719 --> 00:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>part of a sasquatch body, suggesting that the head or

558
00:38:12.480 --> 00:38:15.199
<v Speaker 1>at least half of the lower jaw would be most valuable,

559
00:38:15.880 --> 00:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>while some assumed Krantz himself would not kill a sasquatch.

560
00:38:19.280 --> 00:38:23.199
<v Speaker 1>He acknowledged actively attempting to do so, driving back roads

561
00:38:23.239 --> 00:38:26.800
<v Speaker 1>at night in hopes of spotting one. He meticulously prepared

562
00:38:26.800 --> 00:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to stop, set the brakes, turn on extra lights, load

563
00:38:30.519 --> 00:38:33.840
<v Speaker 1>his gun, and be outside the vehicle within fifteen seconds.

564
00:38:34.800 --> 00:38:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Kranz's case rests primarily on two sets of footprints, Cripplefoot

565
00:38:38.800 --> 00:38:42.599
<v Speaker 1>and Mill Creek, and two sets of handprints allegedly found

566
00:38:42.599 --> 00:38:46.199
<v Speaker 1>by Ivan Marx and Paul Freeman. He asserts that the

567
00:38:46.239 --> 00:38:50.719
<v Speaker 1>footprints are unquestionably real and the hand prints most likely authentic.

568
00:38:51.559 --> 00:38:54.519
<v Speaker 1>To bolster his argument, he introduced a new piece of evidence,

569
00:38:54.960 --> 00:38:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a single big foot track from Bloomington, Indiana, which displayed

570
00:38:58.800 --> 00:39:03.320
<v Speaker 1>dermal ridges and vast alleys similar to human fingerprints. However,

571
00:39:03.599 --> 00:39:06.960
<v Speaker 1>as we will see, this track's authenticity comes into question.

572
00:39:07.760 --> 00:39:10.760
<v Speaker 1>The Mill Creek tracks, discovered in nineteen eighty two by

573
00:39:10.800 --> 00:39:15.599
<v Speaker 1>Paul Freeman featured dermal ridges. Krantz concluded they were genuine,

574
00:39:15.880 --> 00:39:21.280
<v Speaker 1>citing their anatomical precision. However, Freeman's credibility was soon challenged.

575
00:39:21.840 --> 00:39:25.679
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen eighty seven, he admitted to previously faking bigfoot prints,

576
00:39:26.199 --> 00:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and a nineteen eighty nine skeptical Inquirer article presented evidence

577
00:39:30.039 --> 00:39:34.480
<v Speaker 1>suggesting the Mill Creek prints were hoaxed. A US fourst

578
00:39:34.480 --> 00:39:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Service investigation also concluded the tracks were faked. Further skepticism

579
00:39:39.679 --> 00:39:44.039
<v Speaker 1>arose when Lonnie Summer, a graduate student at Washington State University,

580
00:39:44.559 --> 00:39:49.159
<v Speaker 1>analyzed alleged sasquatch hair samples from the Blue Mountains. His

581
00:39:49.280 --> 00:39:52.920
<v Speaker 1>tests revealed that the samples were synthetic fibers, leading him

582
00:39:52.920 --> 00:39:57.039
<v Speaker 1>to conclude that someone was perpetuating a hoax. While Krantz

583
00:39:57.079 --> 00:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>acknowledged the hoax activity, he did not link the fake

584
00:40:00.280 --> 00:40:04.320
<v Speaker 1>samples to the Mill Creek tracks, despite Freeman's connection to both.

585
00:40:05.280 --> 00:40:08.960
<v Speaker 1>De Hinden provided further evidence against Freeman when in nineteen

586
00:40:09.000 --> 00:40:12.159
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven he observed Freeman discovering another set of tracks

587
00:40:12.159 --> 00:40:15.599
<v Speaker 1>at Indian Springs Road. De Hinden noted that the prince

588
00:40:15.679 --> 00:40:19.280
<v Speaker 1>did not display dermal ridges, and close inspection suggested the

589
00:40:19.320 --> 00:40:24.039
<v Speaker 1>tracks had been artificially created. Photographic evidence later revealed an

590
00:40:24.039 --> 00:40:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a logical sequence of left right left left footprints, which

591
00:40:28.320 --> 00:40:33.679
<v Speaker 1>further discredited Freeman's findings. Strikingly, Krantz never mentioned the Indian

592
00:40:33.679 --> 00:40:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Springs tracks in his book, despite their potential implications for

593
00:40:37.360 --> 00:40:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Freeman's credibility. Krantz, however, defended Freeman, attributing his frequent track

594
00:40:42.800 --> 00:40:47.039
<v Speaker 1>discoveries to his dedication to searching. Krantz also suggested that

595
00:40:47.119 --> 00:40:49.840
<v Speaker 1>others had found tracks in the Blue Mountains, but he

596
00:40:49.880 --> 00:40:54.119
<v Speaker 1>failed to provide any details or corroborating evidence. Krantz used

597
00:40:54.159 --> 00:40:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomington track as further proof of Sasquatch. He claimed

598
00:40:57.840 --> 00:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it showed dermal ridges and two undisclay traits that confirmed authenticity.

599
00:41:03.119 --> 00:41:06.239
<v Speaker 1>His confidence was supported by fingerprint expert Ed Palmer and

600
00:41:06.280 --> 00:41:10.760
<v Speaker 1>bigfoot tracker Bob Titmas. However, Tipmos was skeptical of both

601
00:41:10.800 --> 00:41:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the Mill Creek and Cripple Foot tracks and had reservations

602
00:41:14.400 --> 00:41:19.639
<v Speaker 1>about the Bloomington track. Palma, while supportive of Krantz's overall claims,

603
00:41:20.000 --> 00:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>admitted he could not specifically recall the details of the

604
00:41:22.880 --> 00:41:27.039
<v Speaker 1>Bloomington track. The most damning revelation came when the source

605
00:41:27.079 --> 00:41:31.599
<v Speaker 1>of the Bloomington track was uncovered. After extensive effort, Dinnett

606
00:41:31.599 --> 00:41:34.840
<v Speaker 1>located J. W. Parker, the individual who had sent the

607
00:41:34.880 --> 00:41:39.000
<v Speaker 1>track to Krantz. Parker admitted to fabricating the footprint and

608
00:41:39.119 --> 00:41:43.079
<v Speaker 1>cast to test Krantz's ability to differentiate real from fake evidence.

609
00:41:43.599 --> 00:41:46.800
<v Speaker 1>He described in detail how he created the imprint, even

610
00:41:46.800 --> 00:41:50.920
<v Speaker 1>embedding a walnutshell to add realism. Beyond the findings in

611
00:41:50.920 --> 00:41:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Dinnet's original article, further examination of Bigfoot evidence raises significant

612
00:41:55.679 --> 00:42:00.960
<v Speaker 1>concerns regarding hoaxes and misinformation within the field. The persistent

613
00:42:01.039 --> 00:42:06.239
<v Speaker 1>pattern of unreliable sources, questionable track discoveries, and the involvement

614
00:42:06.280 --> 00:42:09.199
<v Speaker 1>of known hoaxers suggests that much of the Bigfoot evidence

615
00:42:09.239 --> 00:42:13.719
<v Speaker 1>is tainted. While some cryptozoologists argue that a small percentage

616
00:42:13.719 --> 00:42:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of Bigfoot evidence may still be genuine, the overwhelming presence

617
00:42:17.920 --> 00:42:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of falsified footprints, doctored photographs, and unverifiable eyewitness reports make

618
00:42:24.519 --> 00:42:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it difficult to separate fact from fiction. Many tracks attributed

619
00:42:28.800 --> 00:42:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to Bigfoot, when analyzed, display signs of artificial creation, including

620
00:42:33.840 --> 00:42:39.480
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent stride lengths, unnatural depth impressions, and repeating patterns that

621
00:42:39.559 --> 00:42:44.920
<v Speaker 1>suggest molds or wooden cutouts were used. Furthermore, modern advancements

622
00:42:44.920 --> 00:42:48.719
<v Speaker 1>in forensic analysis have enabled researchers to study dermal ridge

623
00:42:48.760 --> 00:42:52.280
<v Speaker 1>patterns more accurately. In cases like the Mill Creek and

624
00:42:52.320 --> 00:42:56.519
<v Speaker 1>Bloomington Tracts, forensic experts have pointed out discrepancies that suggest

625
00:42:56.599 --> 00:43:02.239
<v Speaker 1>human interference rather than authentic biological impression. The psychology behind

626
00:43:02.280 --> 00:43:06.440
<v Speaker 1>hoaxing also plays a significant role. The desire for fame,

627
00:43:06.800 --> 00:43:11.360
<v Speaker 1>financial gain, and media attention often drives individuals to create

628
00:43:11.440 --> 00:43:16.639
<v Speaker 1>elaborate fabrications. In some cases, hoaxers even claim responsibility for

629
00:43:16.679 --> 00:43:20.039
<v Speaker 1>their actions years later, as seen with J. W. Parker.

630
00:43:20.920 --> 00:43:25.559
<v Speaker 1>The phenomenon of self deception among researchers, including Krantz, may

631
00:43:25.599 --> 00:43:30.599
<v Speaker 1>also contribute to the persistence of questionable evidence. Cognitive biases,

632
00:43:30.920 --> 00:43:34.880
<v Speaker 1>such as confirmation bias, may lead even seasoned scientists to

633
00:43:34.960 --> 00:43:39.280
<v Speaker 1>interpret ambiguous data as supporting their beliefs, rather than maintaining

634
00:43:39.360 --> 00:43:44.800
<v Speaker 1>objective skepticism. Despite Krantz's claims of scientific rigor, his willingness

635
00:43:44.880 --> 00:43:49.159
<v Speaker 1>to accept suspect evidence raises concerns about his approach. By

636
00:43:49.199 --> 00:43:52.679
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly endorsing evidence linked to known hoaxers and failing to

637
00:43:52.719 --> 00:43:57.679
<v Speaker 1>disclose relevant details, Krantz undermines his credibility. While he remains

638
00:43:57.679 --> 00:44:01.079
<v Speaker 1>a prominent figure in the bigfoot field, his methodology leaves

639
00:44:01.159 --> 00:44:05.840
<v Speaker 1>much to be questioned. As Cliff Crook aptly summarized, science

640
00:44:05.880 --> 00:44:09.039
<v Speaker 1>is about discovering the truth, it is evident that Grover

641
00:44:09.119 --> 00:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Krantz has consistently abused his scientific credentials by his constant

642
00:44:13.519 --> 00:44:18.320
<v Speaker 1>failure to acknowledge plain facts. This analysis is an interpretation

643
00:44:18.400 --> 00:44:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of Michael R. Dinnett's original article Bigfoot Evidence Are These

644
00:44:22.960 --> 00:44:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Tracks Real? As published in The Skeptical Inquirer Volume eighteen

645
00:44:27.280 --> 00:44:32.760
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen ninety three. Additional forensic research, historical context and

646
00:44:32.840 --> 00:44:36.880
<v Speaker 1>speculation on hoaxes and psychological factors influencing the belief in

647
00:44:36.920 --> 00:44:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Bigfoot have been incorporated. While this article aims to provide

648
00:44:41.320 --> 00:44:45.559
<v Speaker 1>a balanced overview, the interpretations and conclusions are ultimately left

649
00:44:45.599 --> 00:44:49.639
<v Speaker 1>to the reader's judgment. The debate over Sasquatch's existence is

650
00:44:49.719 --> 00:44:53.440
<v Speaker 1>far from settled. While Michael R. Didnnet's article provides a

651
00:44:53.480 --> 00:44:57.119
<v Speaker 1>thorough examination of the evidence, I do not fully agree

652
00:44:57.159 --> 00:45:01.360
<v Speaker 1>with all of his conclusions, particularly regarding Paul Freeman's alleged

653
00:45:01.400 --> 00:45:05.880
<v Speaker 1>involvement in hoaxes or his broader assertions about Grover Krantz's research.

654
00:45:06.800 --> 00:45:10.519
<v Speaker 1>While skepticism is healthy and scientific investigation, it is also

655
00:45:10.559 --> 00:45:15.760
<v Speaker 1>important to acknowledge that not all evidence can be dismissed outright. Krantz,

656
00:45:15.800 --> 00:45:18.920
<v Speaker 1>despite his critics, brought an academic rigor to the study

657
00:45:18.960 --> 00:45:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of Bigfoot that few others had attempted. While he may

658
00:45:22.320 --> 00:45:26.840
<v Speaker 1>have overestimated the reliability of certain evidence, his analytical approach

659
00:45:26.840 --> 00:45:33.039
<v Speaker 1>to footprint morphology was pioneering. Likewise, Freeman, despite accusations of hoaxing,

660
00:45:33.400 --> 00:45:36.480
<v Speaker 1>claim to have found multiple tracks over the years, and

661
00:45:36.559 --> 00:45:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it is difficult to ascertain with absolute certainty whether all

662
00:45:40.519 --> 00:45:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of them were fraudulent. Ultimately, the question of Sasquatch's existence

663
00:45:45.400 --> 00:45:49.800
<v Speaker 1>remains open ended. The evidence, the skeptics, and the believers

664
00:45:49.840 --> 00:45:54.119
<v Speaker 1>all contribute to an ongoing discourse that captivates both researchers

665
00:45:54.360 --> 00:45:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and the public alike. At the end of the day,

666
00:45:57.639 --> 00:46:00.360
<v Speaker 1>it's up to you to critically evaluate the available data,

667
00:46:00.880 --> 00:46:04.079
<v Speaker 1>the credibility of those who present it, and the motivations

668
00:46:04.119 --> 00:46:08.440
<v Speaker 1>behind both the claims and counter claims. Until next time,

669
00:46:08.920 --> 00:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>keep questioning, keep exploring, and who knows, you might just

670
00:46:13.000 --> 00:46:14.760
<v Speaker 1>stumble upon the next big discovery.

671
00:46:16.159 --> 00:46:25.239
<v Speaker 3>They say, you don't gotta go home, but you can't stay. No,

672
00:46:25.800 --> 00:46:26.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to be.

673
00:46:28.960 --> 00:46:30.360
<v Speaker 2>We're outing.

674
00:46:52.559 --> 00:47:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Job, this job, chid everything, choice me to stay right,

675
00:47:04.719 --> 00:47:35.079
<v Speaker 3>you come in right away side steps still stay stays

676
00:47:36.159 --> 00:48:09.920
<v Speaker 3>standing inside steps step still hess pssst in state pass

677
00:48:10.239 --> 00:48:18.920
<v Speaker 3>set in state assst uss insist
