WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:04.799
<v Speaker 1>The other problem here, though, is another a concept called interpassivity.

2
00:00:05.320 --> 00:00:11.519
<v Speaker 1>Zorin could put us into this interpassive state where, because

3
00:00:11.560 --> 00:00:14.919
<v Speaker 1>the problem is, you know, this spectacle of him winning

4
00:00:15.080 --> 00:00:17.519
<v Speaker 1>could be taken as you, oh, great, I don't need

5
00:00:17.559 --> 00:00:20.039
<v Speaker 1>to do anything anymore. I don't need to get out

6
00:00:20.039 --> 00:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>there and support him because he's going to do my

7
00:00:22.039 --> 00:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>anti capitalism for me. And whether or not he does

8
00:00:25.760 --> 00:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is obviously just a question that has to be left

9
00:00:28.039 --> 00:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to the future. But it goes to the broader point

10
00:00:31.960 --> 00:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that when you have fascism, when you have communism, you

11
00:00:35.000 --> 00:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>need propaganda with those things you need to argue, but

12
00:00:37.759 --> 00:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>capitalism doesn't need you to believe it works for it

13
00:00:41.520 --> 00:00:46.679
<v Speaker 1>to work. And apparently, according to this argument, fascism and

14
00:00:46.719 --> 00:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>communism are things that require you to believe them to

15
00:00:50.759 --> 00:00:55.479
<v Speaker 1>work for them to work. So in capitalism and capitalist

16
00:00:55.520 --> 00:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>realism you can have this state where I don't believe

17
00:00:57.960 --> 00:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>money is real, but I act as if it is,

18
00:01:00.399 --> 00:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>or I don't believe this works, but I act as

19
00:01:02.880 --> 00:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>if it does work. Right, you get into this capitalism

20
00:01:07.000 --> 00:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>capitalist realism is this unique situation that produces that, and

21
00:01:11.239 --> 00:01:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the danger of interpassivity is, you know, whenever any spectacle

22
00:01:14.920 --> 00:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>comes along like Zorin winning or the Squad winning, or

23
00:01:17.920 --> 00:01:19.079
<v Speaker 1>Bernie gaining ground.

24
00:01:19.159 --> 00:01:19.359
<v Speaker 2>Right.

25
00:01:20.040 --> 00:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>The danger is that it can relax us into passivity

26
00:01:22.959 --> 00:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's, like we see, it's obviously the media system

27
00:01:26.120 --> 00:01:28.239
<v Speaker 1>that we're not going Unless you're going in person to

28
00:01:28.319 --> 00:01:31.439
<v Speaker 1>their rallies and hearing them speak, you're probably getting this

29
00:01:31.560 --> 00:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>information from the media. So you have a spectacle of

30
00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:37.079
<v Speaker 1>anti capitalism and you relax and say everything's good, and

31
00:01:37.120 --> 00:01:53.519
<v Speaker 1>you pay attention to something else. Hello, pillpods listeners. Today

32
00:01:53.560 --> 00:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>we're picking up on a topic we actually covered a

33
00:01:58.319 --> 00:02:00.079
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago now, I guess it was so

34
00:02:00.079 --> 00:02:02.519
<v Speaker 1>I can't even remember when we did our last episode

35
00:02:02.519 --> 00:02:06.959
<v Speaker 1>on Mark Fisher, when we did Exiting the Vampire Castle.

36
00:02:07.000 --> 00:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>That was a bit a bit of a different angle.

37
00:02:10.240 --> 00:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>But today we're going to capitalist realism, something I've wanted

38
00:02:13.960 --> 00:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>to read for quite a.

39
00:02:15.800 --> 00:02:17.360
<v Speaker 3>While and.

40
00:02:19.000 --> 00:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Never never done it. It's not even that long. I

41
00:02:21.080 --> 00:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know, why have you never?

42
00:02:22.080 --> 00:02:23.159
<v Speaker 3>Was this your first time reading it?

43
00:02:23.280 --> 00:02:23.439
<v Speaker 4>Eric?

44
00:02:24.000 --> 00:02:28.039
<v Speaker 1>It actually is, Yeah, I'm really yeah. I missed out

45
00:02:28.080 --> 00:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>on a few texts I know, and I claim to

46
00:02:32.719 --> 00:02:37.159
<v Speaker 1>be knowledgeable about the sort of British Marxism type of stuff,

47
00:02:37.199 --> 00:02:39.639
<v Speaker 1>but I guess this is one of the ones I missed.

48
00:02:40.479 --> 00:02:42.879
<v Speaker 2>It's like one of the only theory books that anybody

49
00:02:42.879 --> 00:02:46.000
<v Speaker 2>has ever read. I know it is. Yeah, it's like

50
00:02:46.039 --> 00:02:47.759
<v Speaker 2>the kind of theory book that gets a lot of

51
00:02:47.800 --> 00:02:50.319
<v Speaker 2>people into theory. They're like, I think I can read

52
00:02:50.360 --> 00:02:52.520
<v Speaker 2>theory now, and then they read Jamison They're like, Okay,

53
00:02:52.520 --> 00:02:53.039
<v Speaker 2>I give up.

54
00:02:53.719 --> 00:02:55.879
<v Speaker 4>There's probably a good chance that many of our listeners

55
00:02:55.879 --> 00:02:57.919
<v Speaker 4>and may have this might be the only theory book

56
00:02:57.960 --> 00:02:58.479
<v Speaker 4>that they've read.

57
00:02:58.719 --> 00:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps yes, oh yeah, everyone can school me on it

58
00:03:02.599 --> 00:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>because that's my first run through. But I mean his

59
00:03:05.080 --> 00:03:08.719
<v Speaker 1>style is quite familiar, right, Like it is kind of eclectic,

60
00:03:08.919 --> 00:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>bringing in very different topics from pop culture, economics, politics,

61
00:03:15.360 --> 00:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and drawing on like psychoanalysis.

62
00:03:18.039 --> 00:03:22.080
<v Speaker 4>And also if it's if it's not obvious already, we're

63
00:03:22.159 --> 00:03:26.240
<v Speaker 4>joined again by Tony from the one Time YouTube channel

64
00:03:26.280 --> 00:03:27.840
<v Speaker 4>and the One Time radio.

65
00:03:27.560 --> 00:03:29.599
<v Speaker 3>Podcast to talk about this.

66
00:03:29.639 --> 00:03:31.199
<v Speaker 4>So I just want to get that, make that clear

67
00:03:31.479 --> 00:03:33.280
<v Speaker 4>so the listeners are aware of what's happening.

68
00:03:33.719 --> 00:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm blowing this introduction.

69
00:03:35.639 --> 00:03:40.039
<v Speaker 2>I'm the substitute teacher, the substitute yeah, guest host at

70
00:03:40.080 --> 00:03:41.199
<v Speaker 2>this phase. Treat me well.

71
00:03:41.479 --> 00:03:43.479
<v Speaker 3>Tony is a guest host, meaning we're.

72
00:03:43.319 --> 00:03:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Going to put on a film for you for m's

73
00:03:45.800 --> 00:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be the class today.

74
00:03:47.599 --> 00:03:48.599
<v Speaker 2>Is a teacher? Yay.

75
00:03:50.240 --> 00:03:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Actually Fisher does talk about teaching quite a bit because

76
00:03:53.159 --> 00:03:55.479
<v Speaker 1>I guess he is a teacher or was a teacher, sorry,

77
00:03:55.520 --> 00:03:59.919
<v Speaker 1>and he drew a lot of stuff on his experience.

78
00:04:00.280 --> 00:04:00.680
<v Speaker 2>What was it?

79
00:04:00.680 --> 00:04:03.439
<v Speaker 1>It was almost like a continuing education he taught in.

80
00:04:03.560 --> 00:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>It was like almost like an alternative oh yeah, school

81
00:04:06.280 --> 00:04:11.319
<v Speaker 1>system where like working class families or people who didn't

82
00:04:11.360 --> 00:04:14.159
<v Speaker 1>fit into the mainstream British school system, which I'm not

83
00:04:14.199 --> 00:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>familiar with at all, could sort of send their kids there.

84
00:04:17.399 --> 00:04:19.560
<v Speaker 2>And I think it was more like the British equivalent

85
00:04:19.560 --> 00:04:22.399
<v Speaker 2>of community college. Oh yeah, yeah, kind of what he taught.

86
00:04:22.480 --> 00:04:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, right right, that makes sense.

87
00:04:24.399 --> 00:04:26.399
<v Speaker 4>I was I was also going to say, it's before

88
00:04:27.000 --> 00:04:29.240
<v Speaker 4>Tony got here and before we started recording, Eric and

89
00:04:29.279 --> 00:04:32.519
<v Speaker 4>I were sort of noticing that there's you know, it's

90
00:04:32.600 --> 00:04:34.759
<v Speaker 4>it's funny that in the Exiting of the Vampire Castle

91
00:04:35.240 --> 00:04:38.160
<v Speaker 4>he talks very like praisingly about Russell Brand, who I

92
00:04:38.199 --> 00:04:40.360
<v Speaker 4>think was for a time like authentically a pretty left

93
00:04:40.399 --> 00:04:43.600
<v Speaker 4>wing guy, like talking about working class issues. And then

94
00:04:43.639 --> 00:04:46.800
<v Speaker 4>I also added the fun fact maybe even some of

95
00:04:46.800 --> 00:04:49.079
<v Speaker 4>you who have listened have actually listened to the audiobook

96
00:04:49.160 --> 00:04:52.040
<v Speaker 4>of Capitalist Realism because it is actually read by Russell

97
00:04:52.079 --> 00:04:53.800
<v Speaker 4>Brandt in the audiobook.

98
00:04:53.839 --> 00:04:57.319
<v Speaker 1>In the audio, he's the narrator. Yeah, I mean the

99
00:04:57.439 --> 00:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>Russell brand crossed the Aisle not long ago.

100
00:05:01.759 --> 00:05:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

101
00:05:02.040 --> 00:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>I think it was always genuine. I mean, and he

102
00:05:04.360 --> 00:05:07.319
<v Speaker 1>was a bit again on like the more British cultural scene.

103
00:05:07.360 --> 00:05:11.199
<v Speaker 1>He was big and until he got into those big movies.

104
00:05:11.399 --> 00:05:14.279
<v Speaker 4>But he's trying to find some self reflective answers.

105
00:05:14.279 --> 00:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that's in the sexual harassment stuff. Yeah,

106
00:05:17.600 --> 00:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>he probably, I don't know. He exited the Vampire Castle,

107
00:05:21.639 --> 00:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>but he turned right.

108
00:05:22.759 --> 00:05:25.000
<v Speaker 4>So what's the So maybe we should just get like

109
00:05:25.040 --> 00:05:26.959
<v Speaker 4>the core thesis of the book on the table. I

110
00:05:26.959 --> 00:05:28.519
<v Speaker 4>don't know if either of you kind of have. I

111
00:05:28.560 --> 00:05:30.000
<v Speaker 4>mean I can kind of give it a shot if

112
00:05:30.000 --> 00:05:32.480
<v Speaker 4>you want. But Eric, did you like a have a

113
00:05:32.519 --> 00:05:35.000
<v Speaker 4>way into the core thesis and maybe also why you

114
00:05:35.040 --> 00:05:37.120
<v Speaker 4>wanted to read it, because in this case, Eric actually

115
00:05:37.199 --> 00:05:38.720
<v Speaker 4>chose the topic.

116
00:05:39.600 --> 00:05:43.879
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I suggested getting back to this text because

117
00:05:44.000 --> 00:05:46.639
<v Speaker 1>again it was one I feel I'm feeling the guilt

118
00:05:46.639 --> 00:05:49.439
<v Speaker 1>of not having read it, even though it's such an

119
00:05:49.439 --> 00:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>obvious thing to read. When you're in this area of anyway. Yeah,

120
00:05:55.399 --> 00:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>so capitalist Realism. I wanted to read it at this

121
00:05:59.279 --> 00:06:02.319
<v Speaker 1>time too because of Zorin's win and the kind of

122
00:06:03.399 --> 00:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it seems to me like the mainstream establishment

123
00:06:07.160 --> 00:06:11.519
<v Speaker 1>democrats at least are like those today who are most

124
00:06:11.600 --> 00:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>under the influence of capitalist realism, because you kind of

125
00:06:15.519 --> 00:06:18.759
<v Speaker 1>have like the anti establishment right that seems to have

126
00:06:18.800 --> 00:06:22.399
<v Speaker 1>taken over and I don't know what they I don't

127
00:06:22.399 --> 00:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>know how they would fit into the capitalist realist argument.

128
00:06:24.959 --> 00:06:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they do, maybe you disagree, but they seem to

129
00:06:27.360 --> 00:06:31.399
<v Speaker 1>be not there. And then Zorin also seems to be

130
00:06:31.519 --> 00:06:36.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of like an anti capitalist realist challenge from within anyway.

131
00:06:36.759 --> 00:06:40.959
<v Speaker 1>It's just it was just an opportunity to use some

132
00:06:41.120 --> 00:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>theory to meditate on an interesting development in democratic politics

133
00:06:48.240 --> 00:06:55.879
<v Speaker 1>in the United States as outside observers and capitalist realism. Yeah,

134
00:06:55.959 --> 00:06:59.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just very basically, Yeah, it's the subtitle

135
00:07:00.079 --> 00:07:03.319
<v Speaker 1>the book, right is is there no alternative? Which is

136
00:07:03.759 --> 00:07:09.759
<v Speaker 1>asking that question. That's rephrasing Margaret Thatcher's famous line, there

137
00:07:09.879 --> 00:07:16.279
<v Speaker 1>is no alternative, Tina, there is no alternative to capitalism,

138
00:07:16.600 --> 00:07:21.319
<v Speaker 1>and today that problem seems to be very dominant, especially

139
00:07:21.360 --> 00:07:25.399
<v Speaker 1>after the fall of the USSR. Right, He's like, you know,

140
00:07:25.639 --> 00:07:28.639
<v Speaker 1>at least in the eighties, you know, there was a clear,

141
00:07:28.759 --> 00:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>actual alternative to capitalism. We say, Okay, you can just

142
00:07:32.680 --> 00:07:36.279
<v Speaker 1>point to I don't know why everyone suddenly forgets about

143
00:07:36.399 --> 00:07:38.959
<v Speaker 1>China after nineteen eighty nine, as if they stop being

144
00:07:39.000 --> 00:07:43.519
<v Speaker 1>communists somehow, But okay, anyway, the fall of the USSR.

145
00:07:43.600 --> 00:07:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Now there's no alternative, like for real it seems. And

146
00:07:47.360 --> 00:07:50.399
<v Speaker 1>you could argue China's pretty plugged into the global capitalist

147
00:07:50.439 --> 00:07:56.279
<v Speaker 1>market despite its avowed communism.

148
00:07:53.800 --> 00:07:58.600
<v Speaker 5>But arguably it is an al Yeah, I mean it's

149
00:07:58.639 --> 00:08:02.519
<v Speaker 5>symbolically at the very let But anyway, it seems like

150
00:08:02.560 --> 00:08:04.600
<v Speaker 5>we're deeper than ever into this.

151
00:08:04.839 --> 00:08:08.279
<v Speaker 1>And you know, this Fisher text is also just a

152
00:08:08.319 --> 00:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>blast from the past too, you know, like I started

153
00:08:10.839 --> 00:08:13.839
<v Speaker 1>university maybe not too long after he actually wrote this,

154
00:08:14.920 --> 00:08:18.079
<v Speaker 1>and I remember two thousand and eight. I remember all

155
00:08:18.120 --> 00:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that stuff too that he's talking about. I've seen those

156
00:08:20.639 --> 00:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>damn movies. He's mentioning most of them, So I mean,

157
00:08:24.759 --> 00:08:27.279
<v Speaker 1>it's also fun for me to get back to that stuff.

158
00:08:27.279 --> 00:08:31.279
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, capitalist realism, it is a kind of subjective

159
00:08:31.600 --> 00:08:37.559
<v Speaker 1>belief that there is no alternative to the capitalist order.

160
00:08:38.120 --> 00:08:41.559
<v Speaker 1>It goes a bit deeper than that too, because of

161
00:08:41.759 --> 00:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the shift to post forwardism, which we'll have to get

162
00:08:46.200 --> 00:08:52.279
<v Speaker 1>into as almost created a new situation in which work

163
00:08:52.320 --> 00:08:56.519
<v Speaker 1>in labor seem to be changing drastically, and our relationships

164
00:08:56.559 --> 00:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>with our jobs and our families seem to be changing

165
00:08:59.559 --> 00:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>very draftically. Seems things seem to be in flux quite

166
00:09:03.960 --> 00:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a bit more than they used to be. And actually

167
00:09:06.399 --> 00:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>capitalist realism seems in many ways to pick up or

168
00:09:10.600 --> 00:09:15.399
<v Speaker 1>provide an alternative way of conceptualizing all this to something

169
00:09:16.000 --> 00:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>like say Friedrich Jameson's the Logic of Postmodernism or the

170
00:09:23.759 --> 00:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Logic of late Capitalism. It's another way of talking about

171
00:09:27.919 --> 00:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>postmodernism with some different ideas about it for those of you,

172
00:09:32.039 --> 00:09:36.639
<v Speaker 1>for those who may be less comfortable with using postmodernism

173
00:09:37.240 --> 00:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>as a way to conceptualize all of these social changes

174
00:09:41.759 --> 00:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>over the twentieth century and beyond. So it's not just

175
00:09:44.440 --> 00:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>like a simple you know, oh, there's an alternative, that's

176
00:09:47.399 --> 00:09:48.559
<v Speaker 1>the definition of it.

177
00:09:48.559 --> 00:09:49.000
<v Speaker 2>It does.

178
00:09:49.240 --> 00:09:53.279
<v Speaker 1>It is a cultural and historical configuration in much the

179
00:09:53.320 --> 00:09:56.639
<v Speaker 1>same way that postmodernism is. When you use it in

180
00:09:56.720 --> 00:10:01.639
<v Speaker 1>the way Jameson uses it, so can get into more

181
00:10:01.639 --> 00:10:04.279
<v Speaker 1>of the specifics as we go along. But that's the

182
00:10:04.399 --> 00:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>general you know, that's why I was thinking of about it,

183
00:10:06.879 --> 00:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of a basic what is capitalist realism?

184
00:10:11.200 --> 00:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>What's Fisher're talking about here?

185
00:10:12.759 --> 00:10:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Also the kind of Gijak saying it's like much easier

186
00:10:15.360 --> 00:10:17.279
<v Speaker 4>to imagine an end of the world, write some sort

187
00:10:17.279 --> 00:10:19.639
<v Speaker 4>of catastrophe than it is an end to capitalism, and

188
00:10:20.039 --> 00:10:22.679
<v Speaker 4>like so, and that's sort of like the way and

189
00:10:22.720 --> 00:10:25.559
<v Speaker 4>I guess like the fact that that's assuming you accept

190
00:10:25.600 --> 00:10:29.840
<v Speaker 4>that premise, the fact that that's true is like evidence

191
00:10:29.879 --> 00:10:34.480
<v Speaker 4>of capitalist realism existing in our sort of social political,

192
00:10:34.519 --> 00:10:35.360
<v Speaker 4>cultural milieu.

193
00:10:35.879 --> 00:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Fisher kind of attributes this equally to Gjek and jameson. Yeah,

194
00:10:41.679 --> 00:10:45.039
<v Speaker 1>this this idea that it's easier to imagine the end

195
00:10:45.120 --> 00:10:49.919
<v Speaker 1>of the world than the end of capitalism, which just

196
00:10:50.399 --> 00:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and then he uses a kind of discussion of the

197
00:10:53.600 --> 00:10:56.639
<v Speaker 1>movie Children of Men at the very beginning to illustrate

198
00:10:56.679 --> 00:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>this idea. But it just kind of goes towards the

199
00:10:59.240 --> 00:11:03.759
<v Speaker 1>broader argument again of capitalist realism, right like, if it's

200
00:11:03.879 --> 00:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>easier to imagine the end of the world, then there

201
00:11:06.360 --> 00:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>really is no way we can imagine an alternative, right

202
00:11:09.360 --> 00:11:16.279
<v Speaker 1>like our imaginative horizons have shrunk in around us in

203
00:11:16.320 --> 00:11:19.679
<v Speaker 1>a way that means we just kind of give up.

204
00:11:20.679 --> 00:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>It's like this situation where now where we don't actually

205
00:11:24.519 --> 00:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>believe in the ideologies that we espouse. We know it's

206
00:11:27.399 --> 00:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>all kind of just like cynical bullshit, and yet we

207
00:11:30.279 --> 00:11:32.399
<v Speaker 1>have to we act as if it's all true. Everything

208
00:11:32.399 --> 00:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>we're saying is true, and we act as if we

209
00:11:34.559 --> 00:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>believe in it. But that's all I was just saying.

210
00:11:36.639 --> 00:11:40.519
<v Speaker 1>You know, like Zorin makes these promises. In one sense, yes,

211
00:11:40.600 --> 00:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>he's a politician. They all want to win, and he's

212
00:11:43.240 --> 00:11:46.679
<v Speaker 1>saying these things to win cynical disavowal. But on the

213
00:11:46.679 --> 00:11:50.639
<v Speaker 1>other hand, like we should rally behind him because these

214
00:11:50.639 --> 00:11:53.639
<v Speaker 1>are good things and we all want these things. And

215
00:11:53.919 --> 00:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>there's this sort of schizophrenia contradiction there between these two things.

216
00:11:58.240 --> 00:12:00.679
<v Speaker 4>I'm actually not convinced that renfree is are a good idea.

217
00:12:00.759 --> 00:12:02.480
<v Speaker 4>I actually think that's kind of a bad idea. But

218
00:12:03.440 --> 00:12:04.320
<v Speaker 4>that's a whole other stuff.

219
00:12:04.879 --> 00:12:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in any in any case, like the afford the

220
00:12:07.639 --> 00:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>general message of affordability is something everybody can get behind.

221
00:12:11.720 --> 00:12:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, yes, that's crucial. I totally agree with that.

222
00:12:14.320 --> 00:12:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Please elaborate on that wire. Rent freeze is bad under

223
00:12:18.720 --> 00:12:21.960
<v Speaker 2>is it like bad under a certain context or just

224
00:12:22.159 --> 00:12:23.159
<v Speaker 2>in any context?

225
00:12:23.559 --> 00:12:26.360
<v Speaker 4>The problem with that with this is like housing availability,

226
00:12:26.720 --> 00:12:30.799
<v Speaker 4>and when you just keep things artificially cheaper, you're just

227
00:12:30.840 --> 00:12:33.240
<v Speaker 4>going to continue to increase demand, and it's actually just

228
00:12:33.279 --> 00:12:35.240
<v Speaker 4>going to be harder to get an apartment, get anything.

229
00:12:35.840 --> 00:12:38.519
<v Speaker 2>You mean that you would, you would reduce supply.

230
00:12:39.039 --> 00:12:41.279
<v Speaker 4>You're gonna You're also going to reduce the incentive to

231
00:12:41.360 --> 00:12:42.080
<v Speaker 4>increase supply.

232
00:12:43.000 --> 00:12:44.919
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know about the demand, but the supply

233
00:12:45.240 --> 00:12:46.720
<v Speaker 2>is that going to happen?

234
00:12:47.399 --> 00:12:49.639
<v Speaker 4>Do I think that there should be like other policies

235
00:12:50.279 --> 00:12:53.000
<v Speaker 4>that like make rent freezes possible, Like yes, I'm just saying,

236
00:12:53.039 --> 00:12:55.279
<v Speaker 4>like in a vacuum in the current context we live in,

237
00:12:55.639 --> 00:12:58.039
<v Speaker 4>doing a rent freeze is generally like not a good

238
00:12:58.080 --> 00:12:58.919
<v Speaker 4>long term solution.

239
00:12:59.320 --> 00:13:02.919
<v Speaker 1>Disagreeing with how we get there is not disqualifying you

240
00:13:03.039 --> 00:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>from having a leftist point of view is still like it,

241
00:13:06.600 --> 00:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>But the general message of affordability is like something we

242
00:13:09.679 --> 00:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>still even if we don't all agree on specifically how

243
00:13:12.440 --> 00:13:15.399
<v Speaker 1>to get there. I don't think Victor secretly has like

244
00:13:15.519 --> 00:13:18.399
<v Speaker 1>major real estate investments that he's worried about and he's

245
00:13:18.480 --> 00:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>like hiding them and lying to us by saying no,

246
00:13:21.519 --> 00:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>actually there's technical problems that would be hilarious and ballsy

247
00:13:25.000 --> 00:13:26.919
<v Speaker 1>if that were the case, and I'd love it, not

248
00:13:27.039 --> 00:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>really because I'd feel betrayed, but anyway, yeah, I think

249
00:13:30.480 --> 00:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>he's behind.

250
00:13:31.360 --> 00:13:33.240
<v Speaker 4>In New Zealand, there was a policy that was like

251
00:13:33.240 --> 00:13:35.399
<v Speaker 4>a real failure, like when they had kind of the

252
00:13:35.440 --> 00:13:39.320
<v Speaker 4>labor government, where they started giving like first time home

253
00:13:39.360 --> 00:13:42.480
<v Speaker 4>buyers like a big tax credit and basically just like

254
00:13:42.519 --> 00:13:45.080
<v Speaker 4>giving people more money to try to help them get

255
00:13:45.080 --> 00:13:48.080
<v Speaker 4>a house, which sounds on paper like a good idea,

256
00:13:48.159 --> 00:13:51.440
<v Speaker 4>but what happened is housing prices went through the roof

257
00:13:51.879 --> 00:13:53.759
<v Speaker 4>because all of a sudden, there's more people have money

258
00:13:53.759 --> 00:13:56.519
<v Speaker 4>to buy houses, but they're not actually building more houses.

259
00:13:56.600 --> 00:13:58.759
<v Speaker 4>So therefore the price of houses went way up because

260
00:13:58.759 --> 00:14:01.559
<v Speaker 4>everyone was trying to buy into market. So like, you

261
00:14:01.600 --> 00:14:04.120
<v Speaker 4>need more than just like one policy in isolation, like

262
00:14:04.159 --> 00:14:06.919
<v Speaker 4>you need to do more than just give people money

263
00:14:06.919 --> 00:14:09.120
<v Speaker 4>to buy houses. You need to increase the supply of houses.

264
00:14:09.200 --> 00:14:11.440
<v Speaker 2>You could definitely do rent freezes. It's just not a

265
00:14:11.480 --> 00:14:13.200
<v Speaker 2>long term solution, that's what I mean. It's not a

266
00:14:13.279 --> 00:14:16.120
<v Speaker 2>long term. So definitely it's not like it's catastrophic.

267
00:14:16.279 --> 00:14:17.919
<v Speaker 3>No, No, I don't think it's catastrophic. The way that

268
00:14:17.919 --> 00:14:19.440
<v Speaker 3>that policy in New Zealand is.

269
00:14:19.559 --> 00:14:23.159
<v Speaker 1>Like commodifying the housing market in general is probably more

270
00:14:23.360 --> 00:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>long term issue.

271
00:14:24.840 --> 00:14:29.000
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, sorry, capitalist realism.

272
00:14:29.360 --> 00:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we should pivot back to that.

273
00:14:31.320 --> 00:14:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I can. I can bring it to that. Just

274
00:14:33.960 --> 00:14:35.480
<v Speaker 2>I was surprised you want to talk about this boo

275
00:14:35.480 --> 00:14:37.639
<v Speaker 2>because I was thinking of, like, this is the one

276
00:14:37.679 --> 00:14:40.399
<v Speaker 2>book that's probably talked about too much on the left.

277
00:14:40.519 --> 00:14:43.480
<v Speaker 2>In fact, it's so I knew that this book was

278
00:14:44.120 --> 00:14:47.000
<v Speaker 2>something unique when a few years ago I would see

279
00:14:47.200 --> 00:14:50.960
<v Speaker 2>people's hinge profiles like have capitalist Realism in it sometimes,

280
00:14:52.120 --> 00:14:53.559
<v Speaker 2>and it was like one of these books you would

281
00:14:53.559 --> 00:14:54.360
<v Speaker 2>see people.

282
00:14:54.240 --> 00:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Just really quote on the dating app.

283
00:14:56.519 --> 00:14:58.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well what I mean is like you'd find normy

284
00:14:59.000 --> 00:15:01.000
<v Speaker 2>is quote unquote nor me is. Are people who aren't

285
00:15:01.039 --> 00:15:04.720
<v Speaker 2>really into theory like that who would know about this

286
00:15:04.759 --> 00:15:06.039
<v Speaker 2>book and kind of like it.

287
00:15:06.360 --> 00:15:08.879
<v Speaker 4>I think signal that they're like I'm kind of into theory.

288
00:15:09.000 --> 00:15:10.840
<v Speaker 4>They just have like, yeah, post realism.

289
00:15:10.639 --> 00:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Quote, which it is very accessible. It is very accessible

290
00:15:14.080 --> 00:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a virtue.

291
00:15:15.200 --> 00:15:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I think the other thing about it is

292
00:15:17.879 --> 00:15:21.639
<v Speaker 2>that it really is like Jamison Jishak and I would

293
00:15:21.720 --> 00:15:25.360
<v Speaker 2>say parts of Christopher lash kind of distilled in this

294
00:15:25.440 --> 00:15:28.559
<v Speaker 2>more accessible format, although Christopher lash is very accessible and

295
00:15:28.559 --> 00:15:30.559
<v Speaker 2>I think he's much better to be honest, But like,

296
00:15:31.320 --> 00:15:34.039
<v Speaker 2>this book is good. I mean it resonates with people,

297
00:15:34.039 --> 00:15:36.399
<v Speaker 2>I think because of the examples when he talks about,

298
00:15:36.879 --> 00:15:41.399
<v Speaker 2>like in university, how there's this one idea I remember

299
00:15:41.440 --> 00:15:44.480
<v Speaker 2>resonated with me a lot, was this idea of depressive

300
00:15:44.519 --> 00:15:48.759
<v Speaker 2>hydonia as opposed to add hidonia, which like traditionally you

301
00:15:48.799 --> 00:15:51.799
<v Speaker 2>can get diagnosed for not being able to feel pleasure,

302
00:15:51.879 --> 00:15:55.639
<v Speaker 2>but he thinks the sort of zeitgeist of a lot

303
00:15:55.679 --> 00:15:58.360
<v Speaker 2>of young people is actually this inability to not feel

304
00:15:58.360 --> 00:16:01.919
<v Speaker 2>anything but constant pleasure. It's like addiction, but it kind

305
00:16:01.960 --> 00:16:05.120
<v Speaker 2>of numbness as a result of that. And how you

306
00:16:05.159 --> 00:16:08.279
<v Speaker 2>would see people in his classes like wearing headphones all

307
00:16:08.279 --> 00:16:11.240
<v Speaker 2>the time, even if they weren't listening to anything. Yeah,

308
00:16:11.320 --> 00:16:13.159
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean. It was just just this

309
00:16:13.240 --> 00:16:16.639
<v Speaker 2>obsession with always wanting to be distracted. So it resonates

310
00:16:17.080 --> 00:16:17.720
<v Speaker 2>in terms.

311
00:16:17.519 --> 00:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Of art, resonated with me definitely.

312
00:16:20.080 --> 00:16:23.039
<v Speaker 2>In terms of what it says. You know, there's the

313
00:16:23.159 --> 00:16:26.799
<v Speaker 2>kind of obvious like people can't imagine anything outside of capitalism,

314
00:16:26.799 --> 00:16:28.559
<v Speaker 2>but I think there's other aspects of it that are

315
00:16:28.559 --> 00:16:32.240
<v Speaker 2>more interesting. I know, you know, I'm curious what you

316
00:16:32.240 --> 00:16:36.279
<v Speaker 2>guys's favorite chapter was. For me, it's Marxist Supernanny, the

317
00:16:36.399 --> 00:16:37.279
<v Speaker 2>chapter nine, I.

318
00:16:37.240 --> 00:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Believe, Yeah, the last one, I think, Yeah.

319
00:16:40.039 --> 00:16:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Marxist Supernanny has this has a point that I think

320
00:16:43.519 --> 00:16:46.360
<v Speaker 2>gets at something a lot of other Left authors, except

321
00:16:46.559 --> 00:16:50.879
<v Speaker 2>the likes of Jijik and maybe Lash and Jamison, get at,

322
00:16:50.919 --> 00:16:53.960
<v Speaker 2>which is actually this idea of Marxist supernanny. Is this

323
00:16:54.039 --> 00:16:57.159
<v Speaker 2>idea that you know what, like the left has defined

324
00:16:57.200 --> 00:17:01.519
<v Speaker 2>itself about freedom for so long, and but what is

325
00:17:01.559 --> 00:17:05.599
<v Speaker 2>capitalism's big, big strength. It's like constantly giving people things

326
00:17:05.599 --> 00:17:09.640
<v Speaker 2>that they want, but not giving things them what they need. Right,

327
00:17:09.680 --> 00:17:11.559
<v Speaker 2>it's giving them what they want but not what they need.

328
00:17:12.559 --> 00:17:14.960
<v Speaker 2>And what is the left's role in this? Is it

329
00:17:15.000 --> 00:17:18.519
<v Speaker 2>to like accelerate the wave of capital by you know

330
00:17:18.559 --> 00:17:22.079
<v Speaker 2>more opening up more windows of freedom and you know,

331
00:17:23.319 --> 00:17:25.880
<v Speaker 2>desire or is it actually to kind of be like, hey,

332
00:17:26.400 --> 00:17:29.000
<v Speaker 2>you know what, protect us from what we want and

333
00:17:29.079 --> 00:17:31.000
<v Speaker 2>give us what we need. Like this is the whole

334
00:17:31.000 --> 00:17:34.799
<v Speaker 2>point about the supernanny. The supernanny. Oh, I should really

335
00:17:35.000 --> 00:17:38.119
<v Speaker 2>probably elaborate on this super nanny for those who don't know,

336
00:17:38.279 --> 00:17:41.440
<v Speaker 2>is this TV show in Britain which was basically about

337
00:17:41.480 --> 00:17:45.279
<v Speaker 2>this like very menacing, big supernanny woman who would be

338
00:17:45.359 --> 00:17:48.000
<v Speaker 2>called in by parents who had no ability to like

339
00:17:48.079 --> 00:17:52.640
<v Speaker 2>manage their kids, and their kids would be total delinquents, misbehaving, just.

340
00:17:52.599 --> 00:17:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Like Missus Stoubtfire type of thing.

341
00:17:54.880 --> 00:17:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, exactly, like kind of just like eating ten

342
00:17:57.279 --> 00:17:59.680
<v Speaker 2>chocolate bars a day, won't want to listen to their

343
00:17:59.759 --> 00:18:02.720
<v Speaker 2>parents and it's just video games. And usually it would

344
00:18:02.759 --> 00:18:05.519
<v Speaker 2>often be like single mothers who need to call in,

345
00:18:05.640 --> 00:18:09.119
<v Speaker 2>or very where I would say permissive liberal dads, So

346
00:18:09.240 --> 00:18:13.680
<v Speaker 2>I dad's do I say? Like featured, who would be

347
00:18:13.680 --> 00:18:17.480
<v Speaker 2>calling it would be calling in the super nanny to

348
00:18:17.480 --> 00:18:19.839
<v Speaker 2>go manage the kids, and she would bring in this

349
00:18:19.920 --> 00:18:23.240
<v Speaker 2>like really harsh discipline, but like in a way that

350
00:18:23.279 --> 00:18:25.680
<v Speaker 2>would work, not just like mindless, you know, not like

351
00:18:25.839 --> 00:18:29.640
<v Speaker 2>just beating kids or something, but just effective discipline that

352
00:18:29.680 --> 00:18:31.599
<v Speaker 2>would put the kid's life in order and get them

353
00:18:31.599 --> 00:18:34.880
<v Speaker 2>to actually listen, because you need that for kids to

354
00:18:34.920 --> 00:18:38.920
<v Speaker 2>grow up, like some level of obedience. Right, And he

355
00:18:39.000 --> 00:18:42.759
<v Speaker 2>thinks that's emblematic a little bit of capitalist culture. And

356
00:18:42.799 --> 00:18:45.720
<v Speaker 2>then how it kind of destroys our discipline willpower through

357
00:18:45.799 --> 00:18:49.119
<v Speaker 2>constant consumerism, and how it's in the system's interest to

358
00:18:49.160 --> 00:18:52.440
<v Speaker 2>do that. And how if if a lot of people

359
00:18:52.440 --> 00:18:55.279
<v Speaker 2>seem to actually kind of crave and to some extent,

360
00:18:56.039 --> 00:19:00.400
<v Speaker 2>like I feel almost like I have I'm free, but

361
00:18:59.519 --> 00:19:03.240
<v Speaker 2>in a way that actually hinder me. You know, Young

362
00:19:03.319 --> 00:19:06.160
<v Speaker 2>John gets at this a lot like, how now we're

363
00:19:06.279 --> 00:19:10.000
<v Speaker 2>masters of our own exploitation, and how maybe actually there's

364
00:19:10.039 --> 00:19:13.000
<v Speaker 2>been a collapse of authority, but in a collapse of

365
00:19:13.039 --> 00:19:15.599
<v Speaker 2>authority except for like capitalist hierarchies, but in all these

366
00:19:15.640 --> 00:19:18.720
<v Speaker 2>other arrangements, like the family, there's a collapse of authority,

367
00:19:18.960 --> 00:19:22.559
<v Speaker 2>collapse of communal authority, religious authority, and all that's good

368
00:19:22.559 --> 00:19:26.640
<v Speaker 2>for capitalist interest to kind of colonize everything. And I

369
00:19:26.640 --> 00:19:28.880
<v Speaker 2>thought that chapter was great, and I wish it was

370
00:19:29.359 --> 00:19:33.079
<v Speaker 2>longer because I wish he took that logic to a

371
00:19:33.119 --> 00:19:36.559
<v Speaker 2>bigger conclusion, because I think a lot that goes over

372
00:19:36.599 --> 00:19:38.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people's heads, and that's stuff that lash

373
00:19:39.279 --> 00:19:41.839
<v Speaker 2>in the culture and Narcissism has been saying since, you know,

374
00:19:42.119 --> 00:19:44.119
<v Speaker 2>first book was in the seventies and in the eighties.

375
00:19:44.279 --> 00:19:46.160
<v Speaker 4>In a way, I'm not surprised that it goes over

376
00:19:46.240 --> 00:19:50.359
<v Speaker 4>people's heads, because it does suggest maybe some conclusions that

377
00:19:50.400 --> 00:19:52.799
<v Speaker 4>are traditionally associated with a more right leaning or at

378
00:19:52.880 --> 00:19:55.920
<v Speaker 4>least right right leaning analysis of culture.

379
00:19:56.039 --> 00:19:57.319
<v Speaker 3>I mean Christopher Lash.

380
00:19:57.079 --> 00:19:58.759
<v Speaker 4>Too, like for those of you that don't know listening,

381
00:19:58.839 --> 00:20:00.759
<v Speaker 4>is someone that you know, I think that if you

382
00:20:00.799 --> 00:20:03.480
<v Speaker 4>actually read him, it's not really like clear that you

383
00:20:03.519 --> 00:20:06.079
<v Speaker 4>can just say he's a right wing figure. But the

384
00:20:06.160 --> 00:20:09.200
<v Speaker 4>right has co opted him like recently, like the right wing,

385
00:20:09.319 --> 00:20:11.839
<v Speaker 4>like like the post liberals have kind of like used

386
00:20:11.960 --> 00:20:14.480
<v Speaker 4>taken a lot of inspiration from Christopher Latch But like

387
00:20:14.680 --> 00:20:17.000
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm tempted to say that Lash would even

388
00:20:17.119 --> 00:20:19.720
<v Speaker 4>likely reject that characterization, but well.

389
00:20:19.559 --> 00:20:23.640
<v Speaker 2>His daughter does actually very much dislike the way he

390
00:20:23.720 --> 00:20:26.680
<v Speaker 2>is used by the likes of Steve Bannon, because Steve

391
00:20:26.720 --> 00:20:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Banner claims to be influenced by revolt of the elites,

392
00:20:29.480 --> 00:20:31.640
<v Speaker 2>and when you think about that, it's not hard to

393
00:20:31.680 --> 00:20:35.920
<v Speaker 2>see how. But Christopher Lash saw himself, as he described

394
00:20:36.000 --> 00:20:41.240
<v Speaker 2>himself as a socialist in economics and a small sea

395
00:20:41.519 --> 00:20:46.880
<v Speaker 2>culturally conservative on small cea culturally conservative but socialist on economics,

396
00:20:46.880 --> 00:20:49.680
<v Speaker 2>and you start off as a full on Marxist at

397
00:20:49.680 --> 00:20:52.240
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of his career. So he has a kind

398
00:20:52.279 --> 00:20:56.319
<v Speaker 2>of historical materialist look at things, and he's been critical

399
00:20:56.359 --> 00:20:58.319
<v Speaker 2>of both the left and right, Like he'd be critical

400
00:20:58.359 --> 00:21:02.359
<v Speaker 2>of the right for not really proposing like material solutions

401
00:21:02.759 --> 00:21:07.359
<v Speaker 2>and really speaking to superstructural things, and the left kind

402
00:21:07.400 --> 00:21:13.720
<v Speaker 2>of actually having like weirdly capitalistic views on some like

403
00:21:13.799 --> 00:21:16.000
<v Speaker 2>so sociocultural stuff.

404
00:21:15.839 --> 00:21:18.000
<v Speaker 4>With like desire and enjoyment and all that stuff.

405
00:21:18.079 --> 00:21:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Right, he's kind of a critical kind of.

406
00:21:19.640 --> 00:21:23.079
<v Speaker 4>Like liberal illiberal like like like hedonism basically.

407
00:21:23.880 --> 00:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Yeah, it's it's interesting that you brought up biunchall

408
00:21:29.000 --> 00:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Han as well, because I definitely while I was going

409
00:21:32.559 --> 00:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the parts definitely brought me back. I was

410
00:21:34.759 --> 00:21:39.799
<v Speaker 1>like burnout society. There's definitely some big overlaps between self

411
00:21:39.839 --> 00:21:43.559
<v Speaker 1>exploitation that that bunch Han talks about and the kind

412
00:21:43.559 --> 00:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of self self surveillance that after he brought up Deluze,

413
00:21:48.480 --> 00:21:51.759
<v Speaker 1>after Mark Fisher brings up Deluze and that that PostScript

414
00:21:51.839 --> 00:21:56.319
<v Speaker 1>on control Society, he brings up this idea of self

415
00:21:56.480 --> 00:22:00.640
<v Speaker 1>self surveillance, like you're internalizing these mechanisms that were once

416
00:22:00.720 --> 00:22:04.039
<v Speaker 1>sort of seems like they were outside of you. That

417
00:22:04.079 --> 00:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>there that you're being You're being performance evaluated. Your performance

418
00:22:08.440 --> 00:22:11.640
<v Speaker 1>at work is, for example, or in an interview, it's

419
00:22:11.720 --> 00:22:14.599
<v Speaker 1>being evaluated all the time. And there's a big complicated

420
00:22:14.640 --> 00:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>system that that requires. Ironically, as we move deeper into neoliberalism,

421
00:22:19.960 --> 00:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the anti government ideology par excellence, we end up with

422
00:22:23.440 --> 00:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>more and more layers of hierarchy and bureaucracy go figure

423
00:22:27.279 --> 00:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Fisher points out. But one of the things we end

424
00:22:29.400 --> 00:22:34.319
<v Speaker 1>up doing also is internalizing that performance review kind of structure,

425
00:22:34.400 --> 00:22:38.039
<v Speaker 1>so we end up self monitoring, we end up and that, Yeah,

426
00:22:38.039 --> 00:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that reminded me of of kind of Bunchulhan's argument about

427
00:22:43.599 --> 00:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>like what we do with with cell phones and the

428
00:22:46.640 --> 00:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>way we the way we we have to move from

429
00:22:50.400 --> 00:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>like a negativity of almost like cynicism towards ever achieving anything,

430
00:22:56.759 --> 00:23:00.319
<v Speaker 1>to like this overabundance of positivity like work, work, work,

431
00:23:00.359 --> 00:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and work.

432
00:23:00.759 --> 00:23:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Is never done.

433
00:23:01.440 --> 00:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Exploit yourself like a paradigmatic influencer is something. The longer

434
00:23:06.400 --> 00:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>they step away from the computer is the more chance

435
00:23:08.759 --> 00:23:10.839
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to fade into irrelevance. So they kind

436
00:23:10.839 --> 00:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>of have to be and people are literally just burning out,

437
00:23:13.240 --> 00:23:15.880
<v Speaker 1>passing out on the subways and stuff like that. There

438
00:23:15.920 --> 00:23:19.319
<v Speaker 1>are some elements of that I think in here, but

439
00:23:19.480 --> 00:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>more of a materialist analysis as well, because it is

440
00:23:23.200 --> 00:23:26.519
<v Speaker 1>all pinned down on I mean, one of the big

441
00:23:26.640 --> 00:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>tectonic shifts he points at is the movement from Fordism

442
00:23:31.839 --> 00:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to Postforwardism, which is a little more maybe one of

443
00:23:36.000 --> 00:23:38.519
<v Speaker 1>the more obscure things in here that people won't be

444
00:23:38.720 --> 00:23:39.839
<v Speaker 1>quite as familiar with.

445
00:23:40.079 --> 00:23:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Do you want to outline that transition from from Fordism

446
00:23:42.960 --> 00:23:44.559
<v Speaker 4>to Postfwardism just for the listeners?

447
00:23:45.200 --> 00:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I know, I immediately regretted bringing that up prison, like shit,

448
00:23:48.480 --> 00:23:51.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to fucking oh my god. So obviously

449
00:23:51.519 --> 00:23:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it's named after like Ford himself of car Fame, where

450
00:23:57.279 --> 00:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you have a physical factory and you have an assembly

451
00:24:01.000 --> 00:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>line and loads of employees and kind of a very

452
00:24:03.680 --> 00:24:09.640
<v Speaker 1>clear work structure. But actually he dates the transition of

453
00:24:10.279 --> 00:24:13.799
<v Speaker 1>Fordism to Postfordism. What was it like October nineteen seventy

454
00:24:13.880 --> 00:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>nine or something like.

455
00:24:15.640 --> 00:24:18.000
<v Speaker 3>That, where.

456
00:24:19.440 --> 00:24:22.799
<v Speaker 1>There's this shift according to I'll just read it here.

457
00:24:22.839 --> 00:24:27.119
<v Speaker 1>According to Marxist economist Christian Marazzi, the switch from Fordism

458
00:24:27.160 --> 00:24:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to Postfordism can be given a very specific date October sixth,

459
00:24:31.319 --> 00:24:33.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy nine. It was on that day that the

460
00:24:33.680 --> 00:24:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve increased interest rates by twenty points, preparing the

461
00:24:37.880 --> 00:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>way for supply side economics that would constitute the economic

462
00:24:42.079 --> 00:24:46.640
<v Speaker 1>reality in which we are now and meshed. And what

463
00:24:46.680 --> 00:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I got out of this was the movement towards much more.

464
00:24:52.039 --> 00:24:57.759
<v Speaker 1>This word flexibility comes up, and these flexible supply lines

465
00:24:57.839 --> 00:25:04.599
<v Speaker 1>on demands, manufacturing supply lines that are ready to sort

466
00:25:04.640 --> 00:25:11.599
<v Speaker 1>of shift and break and pop up somewhere else. Rather

467
00:25:11.640 --> 00:25:15.039
<v Speaker 1>than having these very stable, secure, long term supply lines,

468
00:25:15.079 --> 00:25:18.319
<v Speaker 1>you also have you know, the offshoring of a lot

469
00:25:18.359 --> 00:25:23.759
<v Speaker 1>of works and the diversification and globalization of all these

470
00:25:23.920 --> 00:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>like logistics lines too. So like Japan is one of

471
00:25:27.400 --> 00:25:30.279
<v Speaker 1>the big then the Japanese car industry is one of

472
00:25:30.319 --> 00:25:34.079
<v Speaker 1>the big pioneers of like on demand shipping for example,

473
00:25:34.119 --> 00:25:39.640
<v Speaker 1>where you have very very carefully timed and tuned supply lines.

474
00:25:39.680 --> 00:25:42.400
<v Speaker 1>You don't just have these big factories and with like

475
00:25:42.519 --> 00:25:46.039
<v Speaker 1>tons of like parts in them anymore. Everything is on demand,

476
00:25:46.200 --> 00:25:49.559
<v Speaker 1>on time. Everything has to be tightly regulated. But then

477
00:25:49.599 --> 00:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, this flexibility creates a lot of

478
00:25:53.319 --> 00:25:58.400
<v Speaker 1>instability too, and so Postfordism is kind of this move

479
00:25:59.039 --> 00:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>towards also markets where it's not about a stable commodity,

480
00:26:05.599 --> 00:26:10.319
<v Speaker 1>it's about you know, creating new desires, shifting to accommodate

481
00:26:11.000 --> 00:26:15.039
<v Speaker 1>what consumers are saying. And by the way, people are

482
00:26:15.079 --> 00:26:19.799
<v Speaker 1>more considered as consumers. Now we're very used to being

483
00:26:19.839 --> 00:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>referred to as consumers, which is kind of a type development.

484
00:26:25.640 --> 00:26:28.839
<v Speaker 2>I would say probably the simplest way I could think

485
00:26:28.880 --> 00:26:32.559
<v Speaker 2>of explaining Fordism and postforism is just the transition from

486
00:26:32.599 --> 00:26:37.440
<v Speaker 2>a producer economy to consumer economy. Like the Fordism is

487
00:26:37.559 --> 00:26:41.640
<v Speaker 2>just you know, assembly lines. It's a company, sorry, a

488
00:26:41.640 --> 00:26:46.160
<v Speaker 2>country where you're exporting goods for other people to consume,

489
00:26:46.240 --> 00:26:50.920
<v Speaker 2>whether it be weapons or whatever, materials cars like America

490
00:26:51.119 --> 00:26:53.440
<v Speaker 2>was producing more than it consumed for a while and

491
00:26:53.480 --> 00:26:57.200
<v Speaker 2>then and you could say the ideology of that was

492
00:26:57.279 --> 00:27:00.440
<v Speaker 2>more what Weber might call the Protestant work at you know,

493
00:27:00.480 --> 00:27:02.400
<v Speaker 2>which is, you know, you should be a little bit

494
00:27:02.440 --> 00:27:05.960
<v Speaker 2>more austere, you shouldn't consume too much, you should work hard,

495
00:27:06.000 --> 00:27:08.599
<v Speaker 2>you should be disciplined. But then the shift from a

496
00:27:09.000 --> 00:27:13.119
<v Speaker 2>consumer economy, which comes with world trade and globalization and

497
00:27:13.160 --> 00:27:16.359
<v Speaker 2>people are consuming more and now the main way for

498
00:27:16.440 --> 00:27:19.279
<v Speaker 2>people to get rich is to sell stuff to Americans

499
00:27:19.319 --> 00:27:23.119
<v Speaker 2>and First World countries like in Britain, France, Canada, and

500
00:27:23.200 --> 00:27:25.799
<v Speaker 2>so you know, with that you get an ideology that changes,

501
00:27:26.240 --> 00:27:28.880
<v Speaker 2>like you get this is the basin superstructure thing with

502
00:27:28.960 --> 00:27:33.519
<v Speaker 2>Marxism is like, when you people and capitalists have a

503
00:27:33.559 --> 00:27:37.359
<v Speaker 2>means of getting rich one way, ideologies are going to

504
00:27:37.440 --> 00:27:39.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of shift in ways that benefit that. It's not

505
00:27:39.799 --> 00:27:43.119
<v Speaker 2>really conspiratorial, it's just that, you know, obviously it's going

506
00:27:43.200 --> 00:27:46.799
<v Speaker 2>to mesh together just due to the nature of the interests, Like,

507
00:27:47.480 --> 00:27:50.519
<v Speaker 2>you know, what ideologies are better for a consumer economy,

508
00:27:50.519 --> 00:27:53.759
<v Speaker 2>one that doesn't tell you to be guilty about consuming,

509
00:27:53.759 --> 00:27:56.200
<v Speaker 2>one that tells you actually should be guilty for not

510
00:27:56.319 --> 00:27:59.119
<v Speaker 2>living your best life, for not consuming. And that's the

511
00:27:59.240 --> 00:28:03.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of also get like these sort of liberation movements

512
00:28:03.680 --> 00:28:07.079
<v Speaker 2>on the left, there's a constant debate between the like

513
00:28:07.119 --> 00:28:11.480
<v Speaker 2>proletarian feminist wing, which I support, and the sex positive

514
00:28:11.519 --> 00:28:14.000
<v Speaker 2>wing of feminism, which is more like, you know what,

515
00:28:14.039 --> 00:28:18.119
<v Speaker 2>we should like legalize all sex work and let's do

516
00:28:18.200 --> 00:28:21.359
<v Speaker 2>all that, and which I think accelerates the trends that

517
00:28:21.400 --> 00:28:25.319
<v Speaker 2>I've got us here, you know, kind of it's a

518
00:28:25.319 --> 00:28:27.319
<v Speaker 2>whole other topic. We don't have to go into that.

519
00:28:27.759 --> 00:28:29.559
<v Speaker 2>But what I what I just mean is like a

520
00:28:29.599 --> 00:28:32.279
<v Speaker 2>lot of the ideologies I think more people when they

521
00:28:32.319 --> 00:28:35.720
<v Speaker 2>have issues with the left, they have issues with certain

522
00:28:35.799 --> 00:28:40.400
<v Speaker 2>sociocultural tendencies, and that comes out of the sixties, which

523
00:28:40.440 --> 00:28:43.640
<v Speaker 2>comes out of this post fort is transition, right.

524
00:28:44.319 --> 00:28:47.079
<v Speaker 4>You're accelerating the processes if I'm hearing you're right, Tony right,

525
00:28:47.079 --> 00:28:48.640
<v Speaker 4>Like that's kind of what you have in mind that Like,

526
00:28:49.359 --> 00:28:52.519
<v Speaker 4>so it's not necessarily like about whatever, like legalizing prostitution

527
00:28:52.759 --> 00:28:55.079
<v Speaker 4>in specific, but just like it's an example of something

528
00:28:55.119 --> 00:28:58.920
<v Speaker 4>that is like that you see as consistent with this

529
00:28:58.960 --> 00:29:01.160
<v Speaker 4>pattern of just like come out of find kind of

530
00:29:01.200 --> 00:29:02.519
<v Speaker 4>like desires.

531
00:29:02.880 --> 00:29:03.839
<v Speaker 2>Right, I mean.

532
00:29:04.119 --> 00:29:07.319
<v Speaker 1>One of the big features of postfwardism is kind of

533
00:29:07.400 --> 00:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>like a gig economy type as opposed to like the

534
00:29:11.279 --> 00:29:14.599
<v Speaker 1>stable work that I don't know, I guess like grandparents

535
00:29:14.640 --> 00:29:18.119
<v Speaker 1>now in this generation had this kind of stable work,

536
00:29:18.240 --> 00:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>paying into a pension, having this kind of company that

537
00:29:21.279 --> 00:29:23.599
<v Speaker 1>lays out the path before you a little bit, and

538
00:29:23.759 --> 00:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe you probably have healthcare through your company and all that.

539
00:29:26.480 --> 00:29:29.799
<v Speaker 1>We move much more towards like a dual income gig

540
00:29:29.839 --> 00:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>economy where work is contractual and expected to be temporary

541
00:29:35.319 --> 00:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and you're not expect the company is no longer expected

542
00:29:38.960 --> 00:29:42.799
<v Speaker 1>to you know, have your back on healthcare and pension

543
00:29:42.880 --> 00:29:45.279
<v Speaker 1>and all these other things. Like the so called sort

544
00:29:45.279 --> 00:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of nanny state did or forced them to do. The

545
00:29:48.279 --> 00:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of welfare state idea corporate or at least like

546
00:29:51.400 --> 00:29:56.119
<v Speaker 1>a kind of corporate welfare state type of consensus. Postfwordism

547
00:29:56.279 --> 00:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of does away with that. And that's also connected

548
00:30:00.079 --> 00:30:07.279
<v Speaker 1>to this flexibilizing of supply lines, this offshoring, this of production,

549
00:30:07.519 --> 00:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>this transition to a consumer economy. And he even talks about,

550
00:30:11.960 --> 00:30:14.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's him and being again in this sort

551
00:30:14.759 --> 00:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of I guess community college like system where he's seeing

552
00:30:17.960 --> 00:30:23.359
<v Speaker 1>kids coming in from families that now have like overworked,

553
00:30:23.480 --> 00:30:27.039
<v Speaker 1>dual income parents, and the parents have a lot less

554
00:30:27.079 --> 00:30:29.359
<v Speaker 1>time to spend with the child. So he's saying, like,

555
00:30:29.400 --> 00:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the kids I'm seeing are seem to be

556
00:30:31.519 --> 00:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>like almost less and less socialized because they haven't had

557
00:30:35.680 --> 00:30:41.759
<v Speaker 1>that like attention that a single income sort of you know,

558
00:30:41.960 --> 00:30:48.759
<v Speaker 1>fordist family could could afford for them. Postfortism makes this

559
00:30:49.400 --> 00:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>makes it a lot more demanding to even have a family,

560
00:30:52.440 --> 00:30:55.839
<v Speaker 1>which is he says, is ironic because neoliberalism depends so

561
00:30:55.920 --> 00:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>heavily on the factory. It's the it's the fact that

562
00:30:58.799 --> 00:31:01.839
<v Speaker 1>the family is the fact factory of the consumers that

563
00:31:01.920 --> 00:31:03.960
<v Speaker 1>need to buy the products that that are being made.

564
00:31:04.519 --> 00:31:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I caught that too in the book where I

565
00:31:07.759 --> 00:31:12.200
<v Speaker 2>actually didn't like that because he kind of uncritically went

566
00:31:12.279 --> 00:31:15.920
<v Speaker 2>with what is a very popular view and at leftist academia,

567
00:31:15.960 --> 00:31:19.640
<v Speaker 2>which I think popularized kind of by Wendy Brown, is

568
00:31:19.680 --> 00:31:24.400
<v Speaker 2>this idea that neoliberalism actually pushed the idea of the

569
00:31:24.440 --> 00:31:29.599
<v Speaker 2>family as something to replace the safety net. But you

570
00:31:29.640 --> 00:31:35.319
<v Speaker 2>know that is like taking Reaganist rhetoric and like the

571
00:31:35.400 --> 00:31:38.160
<v Speaker 2>right wing faction of neoliberalism, because that's where I think

572
00:31:38.400 --> 00:31:40.400
<v Speaker 2>this point of view ignores is that there is very

573
00:31:40.480 --> 00:31:42.920
<v Speaker 2>much a left wing faction in neoliberalism. There's both the

574
00:31:43.000 --> 00:31:46.759
<v Speaker 2>right and the left faction neoliberalism. And they'll say, yeah,

575
00:31:46.799 --> 00:31:50.279
<v Speaker 2>of course the right will sometimes say the family is

576
00:31:50.319 --> 00:31:52.279
<v Speaker 2>like the haven and the heartless world. I mean, that's

577
00:31:52.279 --> 00:31:56.440
<v Speaker 2>not the that's actually a Marx Marx quote, but this

578
00:31:56.559 --> 00:32:02.880
<v Speaker 2>idea of like says that about religion, though, But the

579
00:32:02.920 --> 00:32:06.200
<v Speaker 2>family is like this thing that will replace that should

580
00:32:06.240 --> 00:32:09.319
<v Speaker 2>be exist, but the welfare state should be abolished. But

581
00:32:09.359 --> 00:32:12.759
<v Speaker 2>the thing is the regardless of what anyone says, is

582
00:32:12.960 --> 00:32:16.720
<v Speaker 2>the family was just declining. You know, you see a

583
00:32:17.079 --> 00:32:20.279
<v Speaker 2>broader decline of the family, no, regardless of what's happening.

584
00:32:20.279 --> 00:32:23.400
<v Speaker 2>So doesn't really matter what I think is actually the

585
00:32:23.559 --> 00:32:28.039
<v Speaker 2>overall just factual trend is that Postfordism saw a decline

586
00:32:28.079 --> 00:32:31.440
<v Speaker 2>of the family. And it's I and I think people

587
00:32:31.640 --> 00:32:34.079
<v Speaker 2>throw in that stuff which is like, oh, the neoliberals

588
00:32:34.079 --> 00:32:36.640
<v Speaker 2>wanted to keep the family. No, it's that they were

589
00:32:36.680 --> 00:32:40.279
<v Speaker 2>more like, they weren't idiots, and they knew that if

590
00:32:40.319 --> 00:32:43.480
<v Speaker 2>you threw people off the welfare state there would be

591
00:32:43.519 --> 00:32:47.160
<v Speaker 2>consequences to some extent, and that you had they preferred

592
00:32:47.200 --> 00:32:50.759
<v Speaker 2>the family over you know, the welfare state, whereas a

593
00:32:50.880 --> 00:32:53.279
<v Speaker 2>left where often prefer the welfare state over the family.

594
00:32:53.319 --> 00:32:56.720
<v Speaker 2>I think we should have support both. Like, I think

595
00:32:56.759 --> 00:32:58.160
<v Speaker 2>both are pretty damn important.

596
00:32:58.839 --> 00:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Like worrying about the integrity of the family lately has

597
00:33:03.319 --> 00:33:06.599
<v Speaker 1>been more of a right wing talking point in like

598
00:33:06.680 --> 00:33:13.079
<v Speaker 1>more contemporary politics of today. Fortunately, and I mean he's

599
00:33:13.119 --> 00:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I think his broader point is kind of correct. I mean,

600
00:33:17.039 --> 00:33:21.039
<v Speaker 1>especially for the latest generation where like you know, again,

601
00:33:21.119 --> 00:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the affordability crisis also makes like having a family much

602
00:33:24.720 --> 00:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>more difficult and expensive. And of course, but the right

603
00:33:28.039 --> 00:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>he tends to take this criticism and say, like the

604
00:33:30.319 --> 00:33:36.039
<v Speaker 1>left is against family is the postmodern neo Marxist culturalists

605
00:33:36.079 --> 00:33:40.839
<v Speaker 1>are actually like directly opposed to any kind of family.

606
00:33:40.640 --> 00:33:43.279
<v Speaker 2>But they do say abolish the family. They just envision

607
00:33:43.319 --> 00:33:47.240
<v Speaker 2>this idea of like a communal structure which is basically

608
00:33:47.279 --> 00:33:50.599
<v Speaker 2>like the pre nuclear family structure of the tribal communal structure,

609
00:33:50.640 --> 00:33:52.680
<v Speaker 2>which you know it say's not like they don't appo,

610
00:33:52.799 --> 00:33:55.039
<v Speaker 2>they don't support family, It is that how are you

611
00:33:55.240 --> 00:33:58.079
<v Speaker 2>just going to abolish the family and go to that structure?

612
00:33:58.799 --> 00:34:02.039
<v Speaker 2>And they'll say, well, it's possible because past, you know,

613
00:34:02.799 --> 00:34:05.079
<v Speaker 2>there's been past arrangements. And it's like sure, but how

614
00:34:05.079 --> 00:34:08.199
<v Speaker 2>do you get there in this modern state? And you know,

615
00:34:08.239 --> 00:34:10.679
<v Speaker 2>most people think that it's going to be the administrative state.

616
00:34:10.679 --> 00:34:12.000
<v Speaker 2>And if you look at the way the left talks

617
00:34:12.000 --> 00:34:14.920
<v Speaker 2>about childcare, like the radical left, because a lot of

618
00:34:15.519 --> 00:34:18.719
<v Speaker 2>some some marksists supported a lot of anarchists support it,

619
00:34:19.440 --> 00:34:23.760
<v Speaker 2>and you know, some like academics, left wing progressive academics

620
00:34:23.760 --> 00:34:26.239
<v Speaker 2>support it, but it's not a really popular position.

621
00:34:26.679 --> 00:34:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody is worried about whatever version of the family,

622
00:34:30.599 --> 00:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the very traditionalist heterosexual nuclear family of the

623
00:34:35.320 --> 00:34:38.199
<v Speaker 1>right where you're not allowed to have gay parents or anything,

624
00:34:38.280 --> 00:34:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and then or the more I think ample versions you

625
00:34:41.920 --> 00:34:45.119
<v Speaker 1>find on the left. Everyone is kind of worried about

626
00:34:45.159 --> 00:34:51.039
<v Speaker 1>what capitalism means for the family structure, which it's connected

627
00:34:51.079 --> 00:34:54.079
<v Speaker 1>to the move to postfwardism. Is really what I wanted

628
00:34:54.079 --> 00:34:57.599
<v Speaker 1>to say, All these different phenomena are connected there. Yes,

629
00:34:58.000 --> 00:35:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Postfwardism is like the movie Heat compared to like older

630
00:35:02.960 --> 00:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>gangster movies like The Godfather and Goodfellas are like are

631
00:35:07.039 --> 00:35:13.599
<v Speaker 1>like the paradigmatic Fordist situations, because in The Godfather and

632
00:35:13.639 --> 00:35:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Goodfellas you have this very traditionalist ghost of the old

633
00:35:17.840 --> 00:35:23.800
<v Speaker 1>world Italian gangsters with these family structures and these like well,

634
00:35:24.119 --> 00:35:30.559
<v Speaker 1>these like hard one value system that holds their almost

635
00:35:30.679 --> 00:35:34.079
<v Speaker 1>very kind of almost slightly mysterious and ritualistic kinds of

636
00:35:34.159 --> 00:35:38.599
<v Speaker 1>hierarchies in place, as opposed to Heat, which is just

637
00:35:38.719 --> 00:35:40.800
<v Speaker 1>like a bunch of guys who are doing a job

638
00:35:40.880 --> 00:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and aren't really like connected and to anything and not

639
00:35:45.480 --> 00:35:48.119
<v Speaker 1>clearly not part of a family. Because at one point

640
00:35:48.159 --> 00:35:50.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the characters wants to get married, and one

641
00:35:50.719 --> 00:35:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of the crime bosses is like, how do you expect

642
00:35:52.760 --> 00:35:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to help me if you're tied down with marriage? Like

643
00:35:54.880 --> 00:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the idea of like rootless criminals who have no attachment

644
00:35:59.480 --> 00:36:04.679
<v Speaker 1>to and they're much more on a hey, I kind

645
00:36:04.679 --> 00:36:09.119
<v Speaker 1>of just compares those The Heat is like analogous to

646
00:36:09.199 --> 00:36:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the difference.

647
00:36:10.280 --> 00:36:13.880
<v Speaker 4>Part of the thing in this book that I always

648
00:36:13.960 --> 00:36:19.400
<v Speaker 4>felt was maybe incomplete or taken a two face value

649
00:36:20.159 --> 00:36:23.199
<v Speaker 4>is the structural explanation.

650
00:36:22.719 --> 00:36:23.519
<v Speaker 3>For mental health.

651
00:36:23.800 --> 00:36:26.119
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I guess that that it's like that, it's like, oh,

652
00:36:26.159 --> 00:36:29.239
<v Speaker 4>like it's it's like the capitalist economic which like I'm

653
00:36:29.400 --> 00:36:31.119
<v Speaker 4>I think that that plays a role, but it's like

654
00:36:31.199 --> 00:36:33.719
<v Speaker 4>not the actual mechanism. And I do actually feel like

655
00:36:33.760 --> 00:36:37.280
<v Speaker 4>maybe the family is like an important kind of question

656
00:36:37.440 --> 00:36:40.960
<v Speaker 4>here that uh that like that I again, and I've

657
00:36:40.960 --> 00:36:44.840
<v Speaker 4>said this before on the podcast on past topics, that uh,

658
00:36:45.079 --> 00:36:48.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, the left is maybe not equipped enough or

659
00:36:48.320 --> 00:36:51.440
<v Speaker 4>like too wary because of how conservative right wing coded

660
00:36:51.519 --> 00:36:53.960
<v Speaker 4>talk about the family is and religion.

661
00:36:54.440 --> 00:36:55.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and really well, when I.

662
00:36:55.639 --> 00:36:59.119
<v Speaker 4>Really do feel like like just saying, oh, like it's

663
00:36:59.199 --> 00:37:01.719
<v Speaker 4>because capital is is so toxic and it's not giving

664
00:37:01.800 --> 00:37:04.039
<v Speaker 4>us the things that we need. That's why we're all depressed.

665
00:37:04.079 --> 00:37:06.880
<v Speaker 4>I just don't think that that's a that's an incomplete.

666
00:37:06.440 --> 00:37:08.199
<v Speaker 2>Story, because we have to work. That's the thing. The

667
00:37:08.239 --> 00:37:10.320
<v Speaker 2>way they take it is like, oh, capitalism makes us

668
00:37:10.320 --> 00:37:13.639
<v Speaker 2>depressed because we have to work. And it's like, I.

669
00:37:13.679 --> 00:37:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Mean, in some cases that's true.

670
00:37:15.039 --> 00:37:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Part like capital well, the thing about Marx, Like, remember Mark,

671
00:37:17.920 --> 00:37:20.800
<v Speaker 2>what Marx was saying said capitalism creates alienation, not that

672
00:37:20.840 --> 00:37:24.159
<v Speaker 2>it makes you depressed. There are different things. I mean,

673
00:37:24.239 --> 00:37:27.920
<v Speaker 2>alienation is a does like limit your humanity. It kind

674
00:37:27.960 --> 00:37:31.239
<v Speaker 2>of dehumanizes you in some way. But it's not like

675
00:37:31.559 --> 00:37:34.360
<v Speaker 2>he's not saying capitalism makes you want to kill yourself.

676
00:37:35.559 --> 00:37:39.199
<v Speaker 2>Like the rise of mental illness is is really something

677
00:37:39.679 --> 00:37:42.320
<v Speaker 2>unpressed in it that we've been seeing and it's does

678
00:37:42.599 --> 00:37:45.360
<v Speaker 2>zact like it's merely as a result of people now

679
00:37:45.559 --> 00:37:48.280
<v Speaker 2>just being open about it. Like I mean, it's completely

680
00:37:48.400 --> 00:37:51.239
<v Speaker 2>utter bowl like the fact that you have such high

681
00:37:51.239 --> 00:37:54.559
<v Speaker 2>depression rates and suicide rates in the most rich countries.

682
00:37:54.599 --> 00:37:58.559
<v Speaker 2>May I add I think Han takes Mark Fisher's analysis

683
00:37:58.639 --> 00:38:02.920
<v Speaker 2>to a more strong conclusion. Like Young Johan talks about

684
00:38:02.920 --> 00:38:05.360
<v Speaker 2>the family, but he also talks about religion and decline

685
00:38:05.400 --> 00:38:08.840
<v Speaker 2>of rituals, where he says the decline of ritual of

686
00:38:08.840 --> 00:38:12.920
<v Speaker 2>religion has not been completely emancipatory process because while we

687
00:38:12.960 --> 00:38:16.280
<v Speaker 2>can say, like organized religion was really repressive and some

688
00:38:16.320 --> 00:38:21.000
<v Speaker 2>of the superstitions of some religions were very backward and unenlightening,

689
00:38:21.519 --> 00:38:24.639
<v Speaker 2>he thinks that you think the core strength of religion

690
00:38:24.800 --> 00:38:28.719
<v Speaker 2>is rituals, and rituals are something that are actually good,

691
00:38:29.119 --> 00:38:32.199
<v Speaker 2>and that is very much missing in the capitalist society.

692
00:38:33.079 --> 00:38:36.320
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, like I think, I mean, he goes as

693
00:38:36.400 --> 00:38:38.960
<v Speaker 2>far to say that is the cause of depression, and

694
00:38:39.000 --> 00:38:40.800
<v Speaker 2>I think that's certainly part of it.

695
00:38:40.800 --> 00:38:43.760
<v Speaker 1>It is interesting that he brings up the mental health

696
00:38:43.800 --> 00:38:47.360
<v Speaker 1>crisis because that has been seeing a lot of attention,

697
00:38:47.760 --> 00:38:50.679
<v Speaker 1>especially in universities in the last couple of years. This

698
00:38:51.000 --> 00:38:53.920
<v Speaker 1>like sort of and obviously we got a good dose

699
00:38:53.960 --> 00:38:57.079
<v Speaker 1>of dose of it in COVID as well, the mental

700
00:38:57.119 --> 00:39:01.840
<v Speaker 1>health epidemic, the hidden pandemic it was called at the

701
00:39:01.880 --> 00:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>time or something like that. And not that I'm laughing

702
00:39:05.039 --> 00:39:10.280
<v Speaker 1>at it. It's a serious thing having an ADHD diagnosis

703
00:39:10.320 --> 00:39:14.039
<v Speaker 1>myself and then reading a line that runs something like

704
00:39:14.079 --> 00:39:18.119
<v Speaker 1>attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is a pathology. It is a

705
00:39:18.159 --> 00:39:22.920
<v Speaker 1>pathology of late capitalism. I'm like, yeah, I'm late capitalism

706
00:39:23.000 --> 00:39:28.599
<v Speaker 1>man produced by money slamming together and Lena Hadrian Collider

707
00:39:28.880 --> 00:39:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and then I popped out, and also my mother and father.

708
00:39:32.239 --> 00:39:36.559
<v Speaker 1>But they're inconsequential to my birth. No, I mean, I

709
00:39:36.639 --> 00:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>take his point. These are depression and ADHD and mental

710
00:39:41.039 --> 00:39:48.199
<v Speaker 1>health are conditions that are obviously neurologically instantiated. It's not

711
00:39:48.360 --> 00:39:50.960
<v Speaker 1>like the scientists who are studying these things are just

712
00:39:51.280 --> 00:39:57.599
<v Speaker 1>crazy ideologues hallucinating genes and cells and brain activity. But

713
00:39:59.039 --> 00:40:03.679
<v Speaker 1>these sorts of things are also reflective of I don't

714
00:40:03.719 --> 00:40:05.559
<v Speaker 1>know if he asks this in the right way, Like

715
00:40:05.679 --> 00:40:11.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously they're biologically instantiated, but what causes them? Like what

716
00:40:11.440 --> 00:40:14.280
<v Speaker 1>is their cause? And obviously the answer will be will

717
00:40:14.320 --> 00:40:18.280
<v Speaker 1>like ADHD, for specifically, is one of the most genetic

718
00:40:18.880 --> 00:40:22.239
<v Speaker 1>things they've identified, like out of out of anything. If

719
00:40:22.280 --> 00:40:25.119
<v Speaker 1>you see someone with ADHD, like there's a huge chance

720
00:40:25.159 --> 00:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that like one of their parents will have it too.

721
00:40:27.000 --> 00:40:31.039
<v Speaker 1>It's very heritable. So that's how they would answer. But

722
00:40:31.079 --> 00:40:33.280
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, I take his point to.

723
00:40:33.239 --> 00:40:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Play devil's advocate. One could like you can definitely say

724
00:40:37.039 --> 00:40:40.760
<v Speaker 2>like that adh the traits we associate that we call

725
00:40:40.840 --> 00:40:47.679
<v Speaker 2>ADHD are genetic, But the classification of ADHD is a

726
00:40:47.719 --> 00:40:50.039
<v Speaker 2>result of capitalism, I think is more what like Fisher

727
00:40:50.079 --> 00:40:53.760
<v Speaker 2>would say, given that, like think about it, like why

728
00:40:53.840 --> 00:40:58.159
<v Speaker 2>is ADHD a problem to be diagnosed? Because it makes

729
00:40:58.199 --> 00:41:01.400
<v Speaker 2>you like the only reason why any pathologies ever really

730
00:41:01.440 --> 00:41:05.760
<v Speaker 2>created as a pathologies? Because it renders your renders you

731
00:41:05.880 --> 00:41:09.760
<v Speaker 2>unable to effectively integrate into the existing society. When in

732
00:41:09.760 --> 00:41:12.840
<v Speaker 2>the case of ADHD, it's like it's not like a

733
00:41:13.119 --> 00:41:17.360
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't make you violent, it doesn't make you completely dysfunctional.

734
00:41:17.960 --> 00:41:20.559
<v Speaker 2>Maybe yes, but like it's just like, you know, maybe

735
00:41:20.559 --> 00:41:22.079
<v Speaker 2>you're not as productive as you should be.

736
00:41:22.159 --> 00:41:25.039
<v Speaker 1>It's a bit of emotional regulation problems.

737
00:41:25.119 --> 00:41:27.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, or you're not as productive as you should be also, right,

738
00:41:27.519 --> 00:41:28.440
<v Speaker 4>which is more mundane.

739
00:41:28.480 --> 00:41:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I have so many days where I'm like, I'm

740
00:41:30.400 --> 00:41:32.920
<v Speaker 1>going to get everything done today, and then at eight o'clock,

741
00:41:33.000 --> 00:41:35.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I did nothing today. In fact, I undid

742
00:41:35.639 --> 00:41:36.280
<v Speaker 1>some things.

743
00:41:36.119 --> 00:41:37.559
<v Speaker 2>I did yesterday.

744
00:41:37.400 --> 00:41:41.519
<v Speaker 1>But but no, it's uh, it's the problem of separating.

745
00:41:41.760 --> 00:41:47.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I guess historical processes from sort of like

746
00:41:47.960 --> 00:41:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the scientific style of explanation, right, Like we know we

747
00:41:51.360 --> 00:41:55.559
<v Speaker 1>know things like heart attacks are modern era diseases because

748
00:41:55.679 --> 00:41:59.119
<v Speaker 1>while people simply just died more often than they would

749
00:41:59.159 --> 00:42:01.880
<v Speaker 1>reach the age where heart attacks became and then once

750
00:42:01.960 --> 00:42:05.159
<v Speaker 1>life inspectancy goes up, you have new diseases to deal with.

751
00:42:05.559 --> 00:42:09.519
<v Speaker 1>Or once the refrigerator is invented and we're not curing

752
00:42:09.599 --> 00:42:12.719
<v Speaker 1>all of our meat, okay, like now stomach cancer is

753
00:42:12.760 --> 00:42:16.039
<v Speaker 1>going to change its distribution, and it's the problem of

754
00:42:16.199 --> 00:42:19.159
<v Speaker 1>separating kind of I guess subject and object in that

755
00:42:19.239 --> 00:42:22.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of way too. It's like, okay, well, then what's

756
00:42:22.480 --> 00:42:26.639
<v Speaker 1>is refrigeration the cause of heart attacks? Like they you

757
00:42:26.679 --> 00:42:29.760
<v Speaker 1>know it doesn't of course, of course there's like it's

758
00:42:29.760 --> 00:42:32.559
<v Speaker 1>so there's lots of different ways to explain those sorts

759
00:42:32.599 --> 00:42:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of things, and ADHD and depression are examples. But then

760
00:42:37.079 --> 00:42:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you know it's no coincidence that you have this like

761
00:42:39.400 --> 00:42:43.880
<v Speaker 1>massive pharmaceutical company. I remember the last time they changed

762
00:42:43.920 --> 00:42:48.679
<v Speaker 1>my my ADHD medication. I can't remember if I mentioned this.

763
00:42:49.719 --> 00:42:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not on it anymore, but last time they just

764
00:42:52.039 --> 00:42:54.440
<v Speaker 1>changed it on me without asking, and I looked at

765
00:42:54.480 --> 00:42:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it and the new place the factory was located in Israel.

766
00:42:57.920 --> 00:43:00.719
<v Speaker 1>It went from a factory from Sweden to a factory

767
00:43:00.719 --> 00:43:04.079
<v Speaker 1>of in Israel. And then I was just like, and

768
00:43:04.119 --> 00:43:06.239
<v Speaker 1>they didn't think that like asking me about this.

769
00:43:06.360 --> 00:43:06.559
<v Speaker 3>We wait.

770
00:43:06.639 --> 00:43:08.239
<v Speaker 4>So it was the same medication. It just happened to

771
00:43:08.280 --> 00:43:09.440
<v Speaker 4>be one that was made in Israel.

772
00:43:09.480 --> 00:43:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Now it was a generic that they started offering. So

773
00:43:12.960 --> 00:43:15.760
<v Speaker 1>once once a generic comes out when there was no

774
00:43:16.119 --> 00:43:19.119
<v Speaker 1>generic before, your insurance company says we're not going to

775
00:43:19.199 --> 00:43:21.159
<v Speaker 1>cover the normal one. We're only going to cover the

776
00:43:21.159 --> 00:43:25.440
<v Speaker 1>generic now. And apparently sometimes the also the pharmacy will

777
00:43:25.480 --> 00:43:28.039
<v Speaker 1>just switch you onto the generic without even telling you,

778
00:43:28.119 --> 00:43:31.079
<v Speaker 1>so then suddenly your medication is different. And I looked

779
00:43:31.119 --> 00:43:33.039
<v Speaker 1>up the factory that was being made in It wasn't

780
00:43:33.079 --> 00:43:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Sweden anymore, it was in Israel.

781
00:43:35.119 --> 00:43:38.599
<v Speaker 4>You'd rather support those blonde Swedes than those than those

782
00:43:38.679 --> 00:43:39.519
<v Speaker 4>Jews in Israel.

783
00:43:40.039 --> 00:43:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Yes, definitely, definitely That's what I was getting at.

784
00:43:43.039 --> 00:43:45.840
<v Speaker 2>And also.

785
00:43:47.840 --> 00:43:53.679
<v Speaker 1>Also all of it's connected. These material developments, developments of science, history, culture, society.

786
00:43:53.760 --> 00:43:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Obviously they all interact, and it's really kind of crazy

787
00:43:57.440 --> 00:44:01.679
<v Speaker 1>to try to separate and isolate these things. But yeah, anyway,

788
00:44:01.800 --> 00:44:03.840
<v Speaker 1>back getting back to sorry.

789
00:44:03.960 --> 00:44:05.519
<v Speaker 4>Well, I just want to I want to bring it

790
00:44:05.559 --> 00:44:08.119
<v Speaker 4>back for sure to sort of like the capitalist realism

791
00:44:08.159 --> 00:44:11.119
<v Speaker 4>and maybe like how we can use this to think

792
00:44:11.159 --> 00:44:15.440
<v Speaker 4>about contemporary stuff. I mean, this was originally inspired partly

793
00:44:15.519 --> 00:44:21.199
<v Speaker 4>by Eric's observations about the reactions to Zoron's when in

794
00:44:21.519 --> 00:44:23.880
<v Speaker 4>New York, but I guess like before getting to that,

795
00:44:23.920 --> 00:44:25.960
<v Speaker 4>I also kind of I've been meaning and I wasn't

796
00:44:26.000 --> 00:44:29.159
<v Speaker 4>sure where to fit it in. Just to comment about

797
00:44:29.440 --> 00:44:33.119
<v Speaker 4>this the sort of thought experiment that I've mentioned before

798
00:44:33.119 --> 00:44:34.880
<v Speaker 4>that I've used with students about, you know, it's easier

799
00:44:34.880 --> 00:44:35.440
<v Speaker 4>to imagine the.

800
00:44:35.480 --> 00:44:36.000
<v Speaker 2>End of the world.

801
00:44:36.679 --> 00:44:38.800
<v Speaker 4>I guess I just want to start by throwing a

802
00:44:38.840 --> 00:44:41.679
<v Speaker 4>little bit of cold water on that, because I guess

803
00:44:41.719 --> 00:44:43.960
<v Speaker 4>it's not surprising to me if you think about it.

804
00:44:44.000 --> 00:44:46.079
<v Speaker 4>Why it's easier to imagine the end of the world

805
00:44:46.119 --> 00:44:49.920
<v Speaker 4>because it's simple, Like it's like an asteroid hits the world.

806
00:44:49.960 --> 00:44:52.000
<v Speaker 4>It's not complicated. It's like people are going to die,

807
00:44:53.280 --> 00:44:54.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, like there's going to be droughts, Like it's

808
00:44:55.000 --> 00:44:59.119
<v Speaker 4>not like the things that could destroy the world are

809
00:44:59.199 --> 00:45:05.800
<v Speaker 4>relatively simp Mass destruction is like not complicated. Making sure

810
00:45:05.840 --> 00:45:10.920
<v Speaker 4>that everybody has like a good material means is complicated.

811
00:45:11.280 --> 00:45:13.079
<v Speaker 3>Like that's why it's harder.

812
00:45:12.880 --> 00:45:15.079
<v Speaker 4>To imagine, because it's actually complicated. So I don't know

813
00:45:15.119 --> 00:45:16.920
<v Speaker 4>if you guys disagree with me, but I guess I

814
00:45:16.920 --> 00:45:19.400
<v Speaker 4>guess I just think that the little the fun thought

815
00:45:19.440 --> 00:45:22.880
<v Speaker 4>experiment is actually like not as revealing to me as

816
00:45:22.880 --> 00:45:25.039
<v Speaker 4>it seems, because to me, it's actually not a mystery

817
00:45:25.440 --> 00:45:28.119
<v Speaker 4>why it's harder to imagine alternatives because it is actually

818
00:45:28.199 --> 00:45:32.039
<v Speaker 4>a very complicated problem, whereas destroying every human on the

819
00:45:32.039 --> 00:45:33.800
<v Speaker 4>planet Earth is not that complicated.

820
00:45:35.679 --> 00:45:38.679
<v Speaker 1>It is certainly like a catchy little slogan that really

821
00:45:38.800 --> 00:45:41.360
<v Speaker 1>drives the point home. It's easier to imagine, and our

822
00:45:41.400 --> 00:45:47.639
<v Speaker 1>cultural imaginary is definitely much more jam packed with disaster

823
00:45:47.800 --> 00:45:52.320
<v Speaker 1>films and climate and zombie and plague and whatever. Other

824
00:45:52.719 --> 00:45:54.039
<v Speaker 1>ends of the world's kind.

825
00:45:53.880 --> 00:45:56.039
<v Speaker 4>Of even in the conversation we've been having now, like

826
00:45:56.079 --> 00:45:59.079
<v Speaker 4>we've sort of been talking about the balance between and

827
00:45:59.199 --> 00:46:02.159
<v Speaker 4>Tony I think up really like interesting stuff with regard

828
00:46:02.239 --> 00:46:04.840
<v Speaker 4>to Christopher Lash and just sort of this like the

829
00:46:04.880 --> 00:46:10.079
<v Speaker 4>fact that, okay, like if capitalism is just about satisfying desires,

830
00:46:10.119 --> 00:46:12.039
<v Speaker 4>well it's no wonder that there's going to be some

831
00:46:12.079 --> 00:46:13.519
<v Speaker 4>sort of emptiness to that.

832
00:46:13.519 --> 00:46:13.679
<v Speaker 3>That.

833
00:46:14.159 --> 00:46:16.360
<v Speaker 4>So then it's we've sort of been dancing around this

834
00:46:16.440 --> 00:46:19.039
<v Speaker 4>idea that you know, we haven't been framing it in

835
00:46:19.119 --> 00:46:22.280
<v Speaker 4>terms of alternatives, right, But there's a way in which

836
00:46:22.320 --> 00:46:24.559
<v Speaker 4>our conversation was sort of talking about, well, what do

837
00:46:24.559 --> 00:46:25.960
<v Speaker 4>we really need in our society?

838
00:46:26.039 --> 00:46:26.199
<v Speaker 2>Right?

839
00:46:26.239 --> 00:46:29.199
<v Speaker 4>And I think Chapter nine, I guess, is sort of

840
00:46:30.519 --> 00:46:33.000
<v Speaker 4>onto some of these ideas that you know, well, we

841
00:46:33.039 --> 00:46:36.039
<v Speaker 4>need some kind of paternalism, some sort of way to

842
00:46:37.199 --> 00:46:40.199
<v Speaker 4>encourage more discipline or something like that, right, because just

843
00:46:40.239 --> 00:46:42.800
<v Speaker 4>Giving people more of what they want, i e. To

844
00:46:42.880 --> 00:46:45.880
<v Speaker 4>satisfy their sort of hedonistic desires. Well, that's not really

845
00:46:45.880 --> 00:46:47.559
<v Speaker 4>going to do it in a way because I mean

846
00:46:47.639 --> 00:46:49.480
<v Speaker 4>it may might help, right, like I mean just giving

847
00:46:49.559 --> 00:46:52.880
<v Speaker 4>people stuff, but maybe like the more fundamental problems that

848
00:46:52.920 --> 00:46:55.400
<v Speaker 4>Fisher is talking about in this book, well we're not

849
00:46:55.519 --> 00:46:58.079
<v Speaker 4>really just going to solve them necessarily by just giving

850
00:46:58.119 --> 00:47:01.960
<v Speaker 4>people like more liberal freedom in the sense of just

851
00:47:02.119 --> 00:47:07.119
<v Speaker 4>more or more hedonistic freedom. And then so like even

852
00:47:07.199 --> 00:47:09.199
<v Speaker 4>so as my point of bringing that up and rehashing

853
00:47:09.280 --> 00:47:12.000
<v Speaker 4>that is, like we are noticing the complexity because there's

854
00:47:12.000 --> 00:47:17.840
<v Speaker 4>like so many like competing interests and desires and concerns

855
00:47:17.840 --> 00:47:21.639
<v Speaker 4>about like what actually constitutes a good life that's worth

856
00:47:21.679 --> 00:47:24.239
<v Speaker 4>living in a society. What's a thing that constitutes a

857
00:47:24.239 --> 00:47:27.519
<v Speaker 4>good society. Well, maybe it's rituals and patterns and family.

858
00:47:27.840 --> 00:47:30.559
<v Speaker 4>I mean, these are like I'm saying, these are complicated problems, right,

859
00:47:30.559 --> 00:47:33.159
<v Speaker 4>these are not This is not like like imagining an

860
00:47:33.199 --> 00:47:35.559
<v Speaker 4>alternative that addresses all of those things that we've been

861
00:47:35.559 --> 00:47:38.199
<v Speaker 4>talking about is seems to me to be actually like

862
00:47:38.239 --> 00:47:39.480
<v Speaker 4>a huge puzzle.

863
00:47:40.400 --> 00:47:45.400
<v Speaker 1>My idea with this thinking about Zorin was just that well, clearly,

864
00:47:45.599 --> 00:47:50.440
<v Speaker 1>like conservatives disagree and that, and they would say it's

865
00:47:50.599 --> 00:47:52.920
<v Speaker 1>very easy apparently for them to imagine the end of

866
00:47:52.960 --> 00:47:57.320
<v Speaker 1>capitalism because Zorin apparently represents a threat because he's being

867
00:47:57.360 --> 00:48:01.760
<v Speaker 1>called a communist. I think, like just just recently, Trump

868
00:48:01.960 --> 00:48:04.480
<v Speaker 1>was just agreed that he's a communist and was going

869
00:48:04.519 --> 00:48:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to look into deporting him, and like Homeland Security had

870
00:48:07.440 --> 00:48:10.119
<v Speaker 1>a meeting about him and all this shit, Like there's

871
00:48:10.159 --> 00:48:13.280
<v Speaker 1>some panic going around. And so apparently for them, it

872
00:48:13.360 --> 00:48:16.559
<v Speaker 1>is easy to imagine the end of capitalism because a

873
00:48:16.599 --> 00:48:19.880
<v Speaker 1>New York mayor could end capitalism, apparently by the way

874
00:48:19.960 --> 00:48:22.719
<v Speaker 1>they're reacting. But that's the point, right, how do you

875
00:48:23.239 --> 00:48:27.440
<v Speaker 1>distinguish their rhetoric from the reality that they're like, they're

876
00:48:27.480 --> 00:48:30.760
<v Speaker 1>not talking about a reality at all. Anyway, as far

877
00:48:30.800 --> 00:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>as Zorin can go, he's just going to be able

878
00:48:33.000 --> 00:48:35.199
<v Speaker 1>to draw a happy face, which is fine.

879
00:48:36.039 --> 00:48:39.320
<v Speaker 2>So there's this tendency, and I've talked about it with

880
00:48:39.440 --> 00:48:43.280
<v Speaker 2>other people on my podcast One Time Radio, and it's

881
00:48:43.280 --> 00:48:47.199
<v Speaker 2>this tendency for the left to affirm or support something

882
00:48:47.199 --> 00:48:53.360
<v Speaker 2>that inadvertently either is it commentative to capitalism, benefits capitalism,

883
00:48:53.960 --> 00:48:59.039
<v Speaker 2>or affirms something that is already happening under capitalism. A

884
00:48:59.079 --> 00:49:04.079
<v Speaker 2>good example is this authority question, like the family arguments,

885
00:49:04.079 --> 00:49:07.599
<v Speaker 2>you often hear in favor of abolishing the family, or

886
00:49:07.679 --> 00:49:11.960
<v Speaker 2>against the likes of you know, Biancho Han's view, or

887
00:49:11.960 --> 00:49:14.800
<v Speaker 2>the likes of Christopher Lash's view, or just anyone who

888
00:49:14.840 --> 00:49:17.840
<v Speaker 2>wants to defend the family. They'll say, well, the existing

889
00:49:17.880 --> 00:49:23.519
<v Speaker 2>family is oppressive, and that sometimes you know, if when

890
00:49:23.679 --> 00:49:26.880
<v Speaker 2>kids are and don't have you know, real freedom, I mean,

891
00:49:26.880 --> 00:49:29.480
<v Speaker 2>their parents have custody and all that. If you have

892
00:49:29.519 --> 00:49:34.079
<v Speaker 2>a bad parent, you're fucked. And now they're not wrong

893
00:49:34.159 --> 00:49:38.599
<v Speaker 2>about that. However, their solution is to look at broken

894
00:49:38.719 --> 00:49:41.199
<v Speaker 2>families and to say, you know what the solution is,

895
00:49:41.559 --> 00:49:44.559
<v Speaker 2>we should just do away with the family. And I

896
00:49:44.599 --> 00:49:50.000
<v Speaker 2>think it's silly and naive, because yes, this is something

897
00:49:50.079 --> 00:49:53.440
<v Speaker 2>that is bad, like that some people have really bad luck.

898
00:49:53.480 --> 00:49:55.320
<v Speaker 2>In fact, a lot of the people who make this

899
00:49:55.480 --> 00:49:58.639
<v Speaker 2>very argument come from broken families, which gives them a

900
00:49:58.679 --> 00:50:02.440
<v Speaker 2>sort of bias in the where they'll say, you know,

901
00:50:03.360 --> 00:50:06.840
<v Speaker 2>if they'll project what is really ultimately a family trauma

902
00:50:06.960 --> 00:50:10.639
<v Speaker 2>onto their politics, and I think, damn, don't ruin it

903
00:50:10.639 --> 00:50:13.599
<v Speaker 2>for the rest of us. But like, also, it's just

904
00:50:13.719 --> 00:50:17.119
<v Speaker 2>not a great solution. What I think we should look

905
00:50:17.159 --> 00:50:19.440
<v Speaker 2>at is why not that we should get rid of

906
00:50:19.519 --> 00:50:22.159
<v Speaker 2>the structure necessarily, or like I don't think there's only

907
00:50:22.199 --> 00:50:25.400
<v Speaker 2>one structure, but that we should think that we're wise

908
00:50:25.519 --> 00:50:28.280
<v Speaker 2>enough that we have figured out this clear alternative to

909
00:50:28.480 --> 00:50:31.960
<v Speaker 2>like the family structure. I think, you know, you have

910
00:50:32.079 --> 00:50:35.119
<v Speaker 2>we really careful before you embrace the politics of like,

911
00:50:35.719 --> 00:50:36.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, let's get rid of that.

912
00:50:36.960 --> 00:50:39.119
<v Speaker 4>I think the real thing is the construction a society

913
00:50:39.159 --> 00:50:42.480
<v Speaker 4>of just deconstructing everything, deconstruct gender, deconstruct family.

914
00:50:42.599 --> 00:50:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Like, yeah, we should look at like, Okay, we should

915
00:50:45.360 --> 00:50:49.119
<v Speaker 2>have better authorities, Like that's that's the question, is we

916
00:50:49.119 --> 00:50:52.280
<v Speaker 2>should have We shouldn't help families so that we have

917
00:50:52.480 --> 00:50:54.239
<v Speaker 2>as we have less broken homes.

918
00:50:54.559 --> 00:50:57.199
<v Speaker 4>Don't get rid of binaries, just have better binaries.

919
00:50:58.039 --> 00:50:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know, I don't know if i'd go that,

920
00:51:00.360 --> 00:51:04.000
<v Speaker 2>but like, actually, actually, you know what, I'm pretty much

921
00:51:04.039 --> 00:51:06.599
<v Speaker 2>I'm very I'm pretty against the gender binary. But that's

922
00:51:06.639 --> 00:51:07.719
<v Speaker 2>another whole topic.

923
00:51:07.760 --> 00:51:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, I just I just meant.

924
00:51:08.840 --> 00:51:11.079
<v Speaker 4>I just meant in the sense of like these authoritative

925
00:51:11.960 --> 00:51:14.079
<v Speaker 4>like ways of thinking about things that like it's not

926
00:51:14.119 --> 00:51:16.239
<v Speaker 4>that there's a problem with like authority per se, it's

927
00:51:16.280 --> 00:51:18.119
<v Speaker 4>just a problem some people think there is.

928
00:51:18.440 --> 00:51:19.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, some people.

929
00:51:19.159 --> 00:51:22.000
<v Speaker 2>People think there is. In fact, like this is a

930
00:51:22.079 --> 00:51:25.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of streak you find in Wilhelm Reich's sort of view.

931
00:51:26.159 --> 00:51:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Wilhelm Reich was this guy who thought that the family

932
00:51:30.400 --> 00:51:32.000
<v Speaker 2>was oppressive. We covered him, didn't we.

933
00:51:32.079 --> 00:51:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we talked about him a couple of weeks back.

934
00:51:34.519 --> 00:51:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the family was oppressive. It gets people to bay

935
00:51:36.880 --> 00:51:39.400
<v Speaker 2>authority because the family's a first cell of fascist.

936
00:51:39.760 --> 00:51:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, holy shit, I forgot about that.

937
00:51:42.000 --> 00:51:44.159
<v Speaker 2>What he's right about is what Hegel kind of says

938
00:51:44.199 --> 00:51:46.079
<v Speaker 2>in the philosophy of right is that the family is

939
00:51:46.119 --> 00:51:49.079
<v Speaker 2>the first cell of the state. And unless you think

940
00:51:49.119 --> 00:51:52.280
<v Speaker 2>you can live with no state, then you'd think that

941
00:51:52.400 --> 00:51:56.199
<v Speaker 2>view is ridiculous. I think the idea of like the

942
00:51:56.239 --> 00:51:56.880
<v Speaker 2>family is.

943
00:51:56.840 --> 00:51:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Where ideology is shaped for Reich.

944
00:51:59.760 --> 00:52:01.960
<v Speaker 2>I think, yeah, but this is this is the kind

945
00:52:01.960 --> 00:52:06.320
<v Speaker 2>of thing this anti this pro hetero, this anti authority,

946
00:52:06.519 --> 00:52:08.840
<v Speaker 2>this blanket anti authority politics.

947
00:52:09.639 --> 00:52:14.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just having sexually repressive parents. What's more authoritarian? Oh yeah.

948
00:52:14.960 --> 00:52:18.159
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people who find themselves attracted to politics

949
00:52:18.159 --> 00:52:21.519
<v Speaker 2>that are, you know, against all authority as such. And

950
00:52:21.639 --> 00:52:24.159
<v Speaker 2>often you see this a lot in the way some

951
00:52:24.239 --> 00:52:26.960
<v Speaker 2>of the left intellectuals who are on this sort of

952
00:52:27.039 --> 00:52:30.480
<v Speaker 2>side like to use Nietzsche. They like to use Nietzsche

953
00:52:30.599 --> 00:52:33.480
<v Speaker 2>and kind of forget about as aristocratic hierarchical politics and

954
00:52:33.559 --> 00:52:37.360
<v Speaker 2>just take the kind of anti authority part and you know,

955
00:52:38.480 --> 00:52:41.239
<v Speaker 2>embrace that kind of like Adulus doayes this actually, you know,

956
00:52:41.280 --> 00:52:46.559
<v Speaker 2>and how he uses Nietzsche, And a lot of the

957
00:52:46.559 --> 00:52:48.880
<v Speaker 2>people who find themselves attracted to this sort of thing,

958
00:52:48.920 --> 00:52:52.039
<v Speaker 2>they think in their own shoes and that's it. They think, well,

959
00:52:52.079 --> 00:52:54.599
<v Speaker 2>you know, I can, I can be a free thinking

960
00:52:54.639 --> 00:52:59.800
<v Speaker 2>individual and I'm perfectly fine without any authority structures. You know.

961
00:53:00.039 --> 00:53:02.679
<v Speaker 2>It's to say that everyone can't be can be like that,

962
00:53:02.760 --> 00:53:07.320
<v Speaker 2>And it's like, one, you're probably an adult. Two, if

963
00:53:07.320 --> 00:53:10.320
<v Speaker 2>you are a kid, this would be bad. Three. Also,

964
00:53:10.400 --> 00:53:12.039
<v Speaker 2>not everyone is like you. This is the thing that

965
00:53:12.039 --> 00:53:14.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people who are intellectuals get attracted to

966
00:53:14.039 --> 00:53:16.719
<v Speaker 2>this politics because they are by default people who are

967
00:53:16.719 --> 00:53:20.920
<v Speaker 2>inclined to this sort of freethinking, free spirited view. Not

968
00:53:21.079 --> 00:53:23.920
<v Speaker 2>everyone wants to be like that. Not everyone wants to

969
00:53:23.920 --> 00:53:27.159
<v Speaker 2>be like that for everything in every matter. Like I'll

970
00:53:27.159 --> 00:53:30.400
<v Speaker 2>give you an example. I'm very like, you know, forward thinking,

971
00:53:30.480 --> 00:53:33.920
<v Speaker 2>free thinking on political matters, intellectual matters. But when it

972
00:53:33.960 --> 00:53:36.920
<v Speaker 2>comes to like I don't know, deciding where to eat

973
00:53:37.760 --> 00:53:40.440
<v Speaker 2>or deciding certain thing. I prefer other people decide. I like.

974
00:53:40.559 --> 00:53:43.400
<v Speaker 2>I love it when people decide, you know. I love

975
00:53:43.400 --> 00:53:46.639
<v Speaker 2>it when someone who knows their shit about something just

976
00:53:46.679 --> 00:53:47.440
<v Speaker 2>goes and does it.

977
00:53:47.800 --> 00:53:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Last night, I decided we go to Patua.

978
00:53:50.199 --> 00:53:53.199
<v Speaker 4>You know, which is a good A good Jamaican Asian

979
00:53:53.239 --> 00:53:55.519
<v Speaker 4>fusion restaurant in Toronto anyway, Okay.

980
00:53:55.400 --> 00:54:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, you just docks to everybody, dude, Anyway, They're great.

981
00:54:00.039 --> 00:54:02.199
<v Speaker 2>The broader point here is about authority. I don't think

982
00:54:02.239 --> 00:54:05.599
<v Speaker 2>authority is inherently bad. I really don't. It's a matter

983
00:54:05.599 --> 00:54:09.440
<v Speaker 2>of better authority and the outcomes that it leads to

984
00:54:10.199 --> 00:54:13.719
<v Speaker 2>some people who find themselves attracted to like just anti

985
00:54:13.840 --> 00:54:18.360
<v Speaker 2>authority politics. It went well with neoliberalism, partially because you know,

986
00:54:18.400 --> 00:54:20.320
<v Speaker 2>when you get this crackdown on the welfare state that

987
00:54:20.360 --> 00:54:23.360
<v Speaker 2>comes largely from the right, starting already with the seventies,

988
00:54:24.079 --> 00:54:26.320
<v Speaker 2>but you have, like, at the same time, the new

989
00:54:26.360 --> 00:54:29.599
<v Speaker 2>left politics is so anti bureaucracy, and part of that's

990
00:54:29.840 --> 00:54:33.079
<v Speaker 2>you know, legitimated, Like it's part of that's legitimate and

991
00:54:33.119 --> 00:54:36.960
<v Speaker 2>that there is a real critique of bureaucracy. But it'll

992
00:54:37.119 --> 00:54:39.679
<v Speaker 2>have as like libertarian politics that actually mesh very well

993
00:54:39.719 --> 00:54:42.480
<v Speaker 2>with the new spirit of capitalism. You know, the new

994
00:54:42.480 --> 00:54:45.679
<v Speaker 2>spirit of capitalism was all about getting government off your back,

995
00:54:46.599 --> 00:54:50.440
<v Speaker 2>about delegating stuff to the market. I think sometimes man like,

996
00:54:50.599 --> 00:54:53.079
<v Speaker 2>because I had never found the systems of the Soviet

997
00:54:53.159 --> 00:54:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Union appealing. If I was alive in the sixties, I

998
00:54:56.880 --> 00:54:59.320
<v Speaker 2>could see myself getting going from a you know, new

999
00:54:59.400 --> 00:55:03.800
<v Speaker 2>leftist to a you know, neoliberal. I mean, a lot

1000
00:55:03.840 --> 00:55:07.280
<v Speaker 2>of left ease became neoliberals. That is a fact. In fact,

1001
00:55:07.559 --> 00:55:10.880
<v Speaker 2>there's this book called the left Wing Origins of Neoliberalism

1002
00:55:11.400 --> 00:55:13.239
<v Speaker 2>that's about how a lot of like people used to

1003
00:55:13.239 --> 00:55:16.519
<v Speaker 2>be like full on Marxist Soviet sympathizers, and after they

1004
00:55:16.559 --> 00:55:19.280
<v Speaker 2>got disenfranchised, they thought, well, you know what, maybe the

1005
00:55:19.320 --> 00:55:23.119
<v Speaker 2>market is the way to a freer society, maybe even

1006
00:55:23.159 --> 00:55:27.559
<v Speaker 2>a socialist society, because you have like this, it's more

1007
00:55:27.760 --> 00:55:30.639
<v Speaker 2>liberating than the state. And it's we look back on

1008
00:55:30.679 --> 00:55:32.400
<v Speaker 2>that like, oh, that's like a you know, I would

1009
00:55:32.400 --> 00:55:34.800
<v Speaker 2>never believe that, But I don't know. Man. The way

1010
00:55:34.840 --> 00:55:37.519
<v Speaker 2>the the left has marked pro I would call like

1011
00:55:37.599 --> 00:55:41.639
<v Speaker 2>the dominant form of feminism today market feminism gender ideology,

1012
00:55:42.119 --> 00:55:44.679
<v Speaker 2>This idea of choosing a million genders it's so marketized.

1013
00:55:44.679 --> 00:55:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Think about it like the marketplace of genders, the marketplace

1014
00:55:48.480 --> 00:55:49.320
<v Speaker 2>of ideologies.

1015
00:55:50.440 --> 00:55:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, that's a that's a tough one. That's

1016
00:55:53.400 --> 00:55:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a tough one. I think there's a difference between.

1017
00:55:56.039 --> 00:55:58.199
<v Speaker 4>Your sciritu agree by the woke mob.

1018
00:55:59.119 --> 00:55:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh.

1019
00:55:59.800 --> 00:56:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a difference between trying to like analyze

1020
00:56:03.000 --> 00:56:05.239
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in any of these situations and then

1021
00:56:05.320 --> 00:56:08.800
<v Speaker 1>navigating the distinction between facts and values, which can never

1022
00:56:09.239 --> 00:56:12.679
<v Speaker 1>really be separated. But it's not like every time we're

1023
00:56:12.679 --> 00:56:17.039
<v Speaker 1>describing something, we're also advocating a very specific solution to it, right,

1024
00:56:17.159 --> 00:56:20.280
<v Speaker 1>just like what opened us up with the housing thing. Right,

1025
00:56:20.360 --> 00:56:24.079
<v Speaker 1>Like we would all agree on affordability, but maybe not

1026
00:56:24.159 --> 00:56:27.000
<v Speaker 1>all of us would agree that freezing housing prices is

1027
00:56:27.039 --> 00:56:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the pathway to affordability in that in at least in

1028
00:56:30.559 --> 00:56:33.360
<v Speaker 1>where housing comes into it. But I think also, you know,

1029
00:56:33.719 --> 00:56:37.280
<v Speaker 1>saying okay, all these genders and reflects some kind of

1030
00:56:37.280 --> 00:56:40.360
<v Speaker 1>market ideology, and then even that, what's the problem with that?

1031
00:56:40.920 --> 00:56:44.639
<v Speaker 1>There's there's a certain level of analysis lackings that I

1032
00:56:44.679 --> 00:56:47.519
<v Speaker 1>can't agree or disagree with statements like that because I

1033
00:56:47.599 --> 00:56:49.639
<v Speaker 1>just don't know what the fuck, where the fuck they're

1034
00:56:49.800 --> 00:56:51.679
<v Speaker 1>even coming from and what the problem is in the

1035
00:56:51.719 --> 00:56:55.039
<v Speaker 1>first place. But anyway, that is to say, I don't

1036
00:56:55.039 --> 00:56:57.440
<v Speaker 1>know the answer to the gender stuff there.

1037
00:56:58.559 --> 00:57:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I guess do we want to mentions?

1038
00:57:00.599 --> 00:57:03.320
<v Speaker 4>Talk about Zoran a bit like because I'm you know,

1039
00:57:03.400 --> 00:57:06.400
<v Speaker 4>as a as a student of political as a doctor

1040
00:57:06.440 --> 00:57:09.440
<v Speaker 4>in the philosophy of political science, I was looking into it.

1041
00:57:09.719 --> 00:57:12.960
<v Speaker 4>What power does the mayor have in New York in general,

1042
00:57:13.119 --> 00:57:14.760
<v Speaker 4>Like for the mayor to be able to do any

1043
00:57:14.760 --> 00:57:17.559
<v Speaker 4>of his core policies, he would need at least some

1044
00:57:17.639 --> 00:57:21.239
<v Speaker 4>funding authority from from the state government. And this and

1045
00:57:21.280 --> 00:57:23.599
<v Speaker 4>the governor I forget her name, Hochel or something like that.

1046
00:57:23.639 --> 00:57:26.159
<v Speaker 4>Maybe I'm mixing it up. She basically said, like she's

1047
00:57:26.199 --> 00:57:28.400
<v Speaker 4>not going to increase taxes on anyone, like she just said,

1048
00:57:28.559 --> 00:57:31.199
<v Speaker 4>and because she's been asked like, are you gonna do

1049
00:57:31.239 --> 00:57:34.159
<v Speaker 4>the things that are necessary for like him to implement

1050
00:57:34.199 --> 00:57:37.440
<v Speaker 4>his policy to for example, create like a like childcare

1051
00:57:37.480 --> 00:57:40.000
<v Speaker 4>in New York City, like she would need to or

1052
00:57:40.039 --> 00:57:43.679
<v Speaker 4>he would need to appropriate like funding, and the only

1053
00:57:43.719 --> 00:57:46.119
<v Speaker 4>way that he can do that is by going to

1054
00:57:46.360 --> 00:57:47.159
<v Speaker 4>the state capitol.

1055
00:57:47.480 --> 00:57:47.599
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

1056
00:57:48.480 --> 00:57:50.320
<v Speaker 4>And so I was just saying, like that's not going

1057
00:57:50.400 --> 00:57:53.119
<v Speaker 4>to happen. So like his core policy is just not

1058
00:57:53.119 --> 00:57:56.800
<v Speaker 4>not realistic. It's not because I'm not in favor of them,

1059
00:57:56.800 --> 00:57:59.480
<v Speaker 4>it's just about like the institutional reality that like then

1060
00:57:59.559 --> 00:58:02.280
<v Speaker 4>that there's only so much that the New York Mayor

1061
00:58:02.320 --> 00:58:04.599
<v Speaker 4>can do. I mean, maybe he can so to freeze

1062
00:58:04.599 --> 00:58:07.119
<v Speaker 4>rents he needs so, I know that there's like something

1063
00:58:07.119 --> 00:58:10.519
<v Speaker 4>called like the Rental rate like review board in New

1064
00:58:10.599 --> 00:58:13.239
<v Speaker 4>York City, and the mayor does have the power to

1065
00:58:13.280 --> 00:58:18.440
<v Speaker 4>appoint those members, but the mayor can't directly like freeze rents.

1066
00:58:18.719 --> 00:58:19.280
<v Speaker 2>He would need to.

1067
00:58:19.280 --> 00:58:22.239
<v Speaker 4>Get that board to agree to freeze rents. And he's

1068
00:58:22.280 --> 00:58:25.760
<v Speaker 4>not allowed to fire people from the board unless it's

1069
00:58:25.760 --> 00:58:29.320
<v Speaker 4>for misconduct, so like he would have to like if so,

1070
00:58:29.480 --> 00:58:30.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, he would have to find an excuse to

1071
00:58:30.920 --> 00:58:34.000
<v Speaker 4>fire all the members of the board and then implement

1072
00:58:34.000 --> 00:58:35.840
<v Speaker 4>his own who are going to promise to freeze rents.

1073
00:58:35.960 --> 00:58:37.400
<v Speaker 4>So it's just like those are just like the kinds

1074
00:58:37.400 --> 00:58:39.679
<v Speaker 4>of fine institutional details that I was looking at. I

1075
00:58:39.760 --> 00:58:41.599
<v Speaker 4>was like, well, it's his platform is just like not

1076
00:58:41.639 --> 00:58:42.440
<v Speaker 4>gonna fucking happen.

1077
00:58:42.519 --> 00:58:46.679
<v Speaker 1>So and no matter how much she feels like kind

1078
00:58:46.719 --> 00:58:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of a breath of fresh air and a real turn

1079
00:58:49.360 --> 00:58:53.079
<v Speaker 1>and at least like municipal politics and or even a

1080
00:58:53.119 --> 00:58:55.480
<v Speaker 1>real turn in politics and the Democratic Party.

1081
00:58:55.519 --> 00:58:57.239
<v Speaker 4>We need a new system in san Antoni will agree

1082
00:58:57.239 --> 00:58:57.440
<v Speaker 4>with me.

1083
00:58:57.480 --> 00:58:58.719
<v Speaker 3>We need sortition, we needs.

1084
00:58:59.480 --> 00:59:03.119
<v Speaker 1>The other problem here though, is another a concept called

1085
00:59:03.199 --> 00:59:09.079
<v Speaker 1>interpassivity that that comes up here in this text. And interpassivity. Well,

1086
00:59:09.119 --> 00:59:13.280
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about the film, Wally, but it's a broader point, right,

1087
00:59:13.360 --> 00:59:16.599
<v Speaker 1>So he says about it that the film, it is

1088
00:59:16.639 --> 00:59:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a great film. The film performs are anti capitalism for us.

1089
00:59:21.920 --> 00:59:24.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's an eco catastrophe movie.

1090
00:59:24.360 --> 00:59:24.960
<v Speaker 2>He brings up.

1091
00:59:25.239 --> 00:59:29.199
<v Speaker 1>So what but and it's a great film, and he

1092
00:59:29.320 --> 00:59:31.800
<v Speaker 1>has some criticisms of it, But what he wants to

1093
00:59:31.840 --> 00:59:36.920
<v Speaker 1>get out is this concept interpassivity, which means capitalism anti

1094
00:59:37.159 --> 00:59:41.119
<v Speaker 1>The film performs are anti capitalism for us, allowing us

1095
00:59:41.159 --> 00:59:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to continue to consume with impunity. And so this is

1096
00:59:45.800 --> 00:59:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the problem when and we you even get this even

1097
00:59:48.880 --> 00:59:52.639
<v Speaker 1>from more like Marxist, like more more even like more

1098
00:59:52.639 --> 00:59:57.360
<v Speaker 1>hardline leftists, is like, well, I'm not I'm against Zorin

1099
00:59:57.480 --> 01:00:00.800
<v Speaker 1>because he's not like radical enough. He's not he's not

1100
01:00:00.840 --> 01:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a true Marxist. He has critiques of capitalism, but there

1101
01:00:03.760 --> 01:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>are critiques from within capitalists and.

1102
01:00:05.320 --> 01:00:06.039
<v Speaker 3>Blah, blah blah.

1103
01:00:06.119 --> 01:00:09.039
<v Speaker 1>He's not enough, and he's ultimately damaging because he's going

1104
01:00:09.079 --> 01:00:12.199
<v Speaker 1>to perform. I don't know, that's almost seems like he could.

1105
01:00:12.559 --> 01:00:16.719
<v Speaker 1>And Victor's skeptical attitude may then be appropriate. Here is

1106
01:00:16.760 --> 01:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that Zorin could put us into this interpassive state where

1107
01:00:22.719 --> 01:00:26.119
<v Speaker 1>because the problem is, you know, this spectacle of him

1108
01:00:26.159 --> 01:00:29.159
<v Speaker 1>winning could be taken as oh, great, I don't need

1109
01:00:29.199 --> 01:00:31.639
<v Speaker 1>to do anything anymore. I don't need to get out

1110
01:00:31.679 --> 01:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>there and support him because he's going to do my

1111
01:00:33.639 --> 01:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>anti capitalism for me. And whether or not he does

1112
01:00:37.400 --> 01:00:39.639
<v Speaker 1>is obviously just a question that has to be left

1113
01:00:39.639 --> 01:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to the future. But it goes to the broader point

1114
01:00:43.559 --> 01:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>that when you have fascism, when you have communism, you

1115
01:00:46.599 --> 01:00:49.239
<v Speaker 1>need propaganda with those things you need to argue. But

1116
01:00:49.320 --> 01:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>he's saying here, the role of capitalist this is a quote,

1117
01:00:53.360 --> 01:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the role of capitalist ideology is not to make explicit

1118
01:00:57.639 --> 01:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and explicit case for something in the world that propaganda does,

1119
01:01:01.400 --> 01:01:06.079
<v Speaker 1>but to conceal the fact that the operations of capital

1120
01:01:06.119 --> 01:01:11.039
<v Speaker 1>don't depend on any sort of subjectively assumed belief. Capitalism

1121
01:01:11.159 --> 01:01:14.599
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need you to believe it works for it to work,

1122
01:01:15.039 --> 01:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and apparently, according to this argument, Fascism and communism are

1123
01:01:20.639 --> 01:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>things that require you to believe them to work for

1124
01:01:24.559 --> 01:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>them to work. So in capitalism and capitalist realism, you

1125
01:01:28.679 --> 01:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>can have this state where I don't believe money is real,

1126
01:01:31.320 --> 01:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>but I act as if it is, or I don't

1127
01:01:33.480 --> 01:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>believe this works, but I act as if it does work. Right,

1128
01:01:37.800 --> 01:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you get into this Capitalism capitalist realism is this unique

1129
01:01:41.400 --> 01:01:45.719
<v Speaker 1>situation that produces that. And the danger of interpassivity is,

1130
01:01:45.760 --> 01:01:49.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, whenever any spectacle comes along like Zorin winning

1131
01:01:49.360 --> 01:01:52.719
<v Speaker 1>or the squad winning or Burnie gaining ground, right, the

1132
01:01:52.840 --> 01:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>danger is that it can relax us into passivity because

1133
01:01:55.920 --> 01:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like we see, it's obviously the media system that

1134
01:01:58.840 --> 01:02:01.039
<v Speaker 1>we're not going unless you're going in person to their

1135
01:02:01.119 --> 01:02:04.639
<v Speaker 1>rallies and hearing them speak. You're probably getting this information

1136
01:02:04.719 --> 01:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>from the media. So you have a spectacle of anti

1137
01:02:07.000 --> 01:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>capitalism and you relax and say everything's good, and you

1138
01:02:09.800 --> 01:02:13.079
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to something else. You go back to, you

1139
01:02:13.199 --> 01:02:15.239
<v Speaker 1>resume your Lord of the Rings movie or whatever you

1140
01:02:15.280 --> 01:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>were watching.

1141
01:02:16.840 --> 01:02:20.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's such a performative ritual at this point, like

1142
01:02:20.320 --> 01:02:24.480
<v Speaker 2>in art galleries or a lot of these artistic events

1143
01:02:24.519 --> 01:02:27.519
<v Speaker 2>where people will say and then then that's why laid capitalism.

1144
01:02:27.719 --> 01:02:31.079
<v Speaker 2>I see a lot of video essayists. It's strange, like

1145
01:02:31.119 --> 01:02:35.360
<v Speaker 2>there's this interesting thing where like bread tube started, Like

1146
01:02:35.400 --> 01:02:37.679
<v Speaker 2>this category of bread tube is this fascinating thing on

1147
01:02:37.719 --> 01:02:40.400
<v Speaker 2>YouTube because it includes a lot of channels that are

1148
01:02:40.440 --> 01:02:43.639
<v Speaker 2>frankly aren't very political at all. But every now and then,

1149
01:02:43.719 --> 01:02:47.320
<v Speaker 2>and they're like three hour long analysis of Harry Potter

1150
01:02:47.559 --> 01:02:51.679
<v Speaker 2>or whatever film or video game, they'll say something something

1151
01:02:51.760 --> 01:02:56.199
<v Speaker 2>late capitalism, and it's almost like a ritual and that's

1152
01:02:56.360 --> 01:02:59.679
<v Speaker 2>the disavowal you mentioned, you know, like this fetishistic disavowal,

1153
01:02:59.679 --> 01:03:02.159
<v Speaker 2>which is to be like, yeah, I acknowledge it, but

1154
01:03:02.239 --> 01:03:05.159
<v Speaker 2>you know, whatever is Usually he talks a lot about this.

1155
01:03:05.239 --> 01:03:07.760
<v Speaker 2>How like the way in which Mao is China would

1156
01:03:07.800 --> 01:03:12.159
<v Speaker 2>deal with criticism, you know, like in Dissent, he quotes

1157
01:03:12.280 --> 01:03:16.079
<v Speaker 2>Mao at a meeting, how he would say, okay, guys,

1158
01:03:16.159 --> 01:03:20.440
<v Speaker 2>whatever criticisms you have of our party, just shit it out.

1159
01:03:20.559 --> 01:03:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Let it out like a shit. And the way describing

1160
01:03:23.440 --> 01:03:25.039
<v Speaker 2>it like a shit, like just get it out, like

1161
01:03:25.159 --> 01:03:27.159
<v Speaker 2>just out of the way so we can move on

1162
01:03:27.480 --> 01:03:29.760
<v Speaker 2>life as usual. It is kind of the way we

1163
01:03:29.880 --> 01:03:33.800
<v Speaker 2>treat like sometimes like our ritualistic anti capitalism. You know,

1164
01:03:33.800 --> 01:03:36.639
<v Speaker 2>it's like okay, you know, yeah, it's bad whatever, not

1165
01:03:36.719 --> 01:03:37.360
<v Speaker 2>think about it.

1166
01:03:37.400 --> 01:03:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Capitalism itself is the biggest purveyor of anti capitalism. Yeah, capitalism,

1167
01:03:44.119 --> 01:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>like movies, music, or the cultural sphere is full of

1168
01:03:48.400 --> 01:03:52.599
<v Speaker 1>anti capitalist messages. Reality shows are a good example of

1169
01:03:52.679 --> 01:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>all this postfortist and capitalist realist stuff too, because reality

1170
01:03:57.360 --> 01:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>shows are something that are affected by what they say,

1171
01:04:01.639 --> 01:04:06.199
<v Speaker 1>which is an interesting situation. So it's like what you

1172
01:04:06.239 --> 01:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>say is real also somehow affects what is real. And

1173
01:04:09.960 --> 01:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess the point is, you know, you can have

1174
01:04:12.559 --> 01:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a reality show and then the audience can react, and

1175
01:04:15.840 --> 01:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>you can incorporate audience reactions back into the supposedly realistic

1176
01:04:20.079 --> 01:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and unscripted show, and there's a feedback loop between what

1177
01:04:23.960 --> 01:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>people are saying and what is happening, and then so

1178
01:04:27.760 --> 01:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>what is real in that circuit, like it becomes a

1179
01:04:30.400 --> 01:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>little less clear. And that matches the point too of

1180
01:04:37.000 --> 01:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>interpassivity and the fact that capitalist ideology doesn't require a

1181
01:04:40.960 --> 01:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>case to be made for it. In fact, capitalist ideology

1182
01:04:43.840 --> 01:04:46.039
<v Speaker 1>works best when you're not making a case for it,

1183
01:04:46.440 --> 01:04:49.119
<v Speaker 1>and so you can behave in whatever way you want,

1184
01:04:49.199 --> 01:04:51.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, as long as you believe this is all bullshit,

1185
01:04:51.800 --> 01:04:54.119
<v Speaker 1>then you can still do it. And I'm sure every

1186
01:04:54.159 --> 01:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Silicone Valley capitalist.

1187
01:04:56.119 --> 01:04:56.559
<v Speaker 2>Is like that.

1188
01:04:56.760 --> 01:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, oh, I know money is completely just paper

1189
01:05:00.480 --> 01:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and worthless and or just bits on a computer. Now

1190
01:05:03.400 --> 01:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about those people, But I'm gonna act.

1191
01:05:07.360 --> 01:05:09.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna conduct my life as of getting as much

1192
01:05:09.679 --> 01:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>of this ship as possible is the most important thing.

1193
01:05:12.519 --> 01:05:14.760
<v Speaker 2>So there you go. My prediction is they're gonna get

1194
01:05:14.760 --> 01:05:16.840
<v Speaker 2>a huge return of trad culture, but it's gonna be

1195
01:05:16.920 --> 01:05:20.320
<v Speaker 2>super commodified and ironic, and it's gonna be totally ineffective.

1196
01:05:20.719 --> 01:05:22.360
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be a bunch of people who are like,

1197
01:05:22.440 --> 01:05:24.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm a trad cath. Now you already see what the

1198
01:05:25.079 --> 01:05:28.159
<v Speaker 2>likes of like red Scare podcast, where they're like they

1199
01:05:28.199 --> 01:05:30.840
<v Speaker 2>consider themselves to be trad cath but are they really though,

1200
01:05:31.440 --> 01:05:33.599
<v Speaker 2>And you know, you people who will like flaunt the

1201
01:05:33.719 --> 01:05:36.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of like crosses, but at the end of the day,

1202
01:05:36.320 --> 01:05:39.000
<v Speaker 2>they'll do the same stuff and nothing will change. Capitalism

1203
01:05:39.039 --> 01:05:39.559
<v Speaker 2>will continue.

1204
01:05:39.719 --> 01:05:41.480
<v Speaker 4>Do you think there's gonna be any growth of real

1205
01:05:41.559 --> 01:05:43.840
<v Speaker 4>trad Like do you think that your generation's gonna have

1206
01:05:44.079 --> 01:05:47.000
<v Speaker 4>gonna have kids sooner like our zoomers? Do you think

1207
01:05:47.039 --> 01:05:51.199
<v Speaker 4>zoomers are gonna have kids, maybe uh sooner than millennials.

1208
01:05:51.599 --> 01:05:53.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they'll have a choice. It's not like

1209
01:05:53.480 --> 01:05:56.239
<v Speaker 2>it's they can barely buy a house. Yeah, that's forget

1210
01:05:56.239 --> 01:05:58.719
<v Speaker 2>having forget having kids.

1211
01:05:59.159 --> 01:06:01.360
<v Speaker 4>So the trend's gonna the trend will conte.

1212
01:06:01.719 --> 01:06:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Look. I have friends who have master's degrees in like

1213
01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:10.719
<v Speaker 2>engineering and chemistry, and like, really, you know, you would

1214
01:06:10.719 --> 01:06:13.920
<v Speaker 2>think employable, employable degrees, and they can't even find a job.

1215
01:06:13.960 --> 01:06:14.440
<v Speaker 2>It's crazy.

1216
01:06:14.559 --> 01:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1217
01:06:14.880 --> 01:06:15.199
<v Speaker 4>True.

1218
01:06:15.760 --> 01:06:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I would expect the family structure to continue to be

1219
01:06:19.639 --> 01:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>challenged under capitalism, as as Fisher's saying here as we're seeing,

1220
01:06:26.599 --> 01:06:29.519
<v Speaker 1>and I would not be surprised if trad came back,

1221
01:06:29.599 --> 01:06:32.159
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of what trad is is just kind

1222
01:06:32.199 --> 01:06:37.079
<v Speaker 1>of playing house right, like like very traditional family roles, childbearing,

1223
01:06:37.159 --> 01:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>stay at home wife, brett winning father, like kind of

1224
01:06:40.800 --> 01:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>this nostalgia for Fordism. It is a it is a

1225
01:06:44.000 --> 01:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a fortist fantasy. I'm sure it'll get stronger if

1226
01:06:47.360 --> 01:06:49.519
<v Speaker 1>things continue in the direction they're going.

1227
01:06:50.000 --> 01:06:54.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I agree. I think that's interesting. Well, I think

1228
01:06:54.639 --> 01:06:56.360
<v Speaker 3>that was a good episode, guys.

1229
01:06:56.360 --> 01:06:58.480
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening everyone.

1230
01:06:58.599 --> 01:07:01.679
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, thanks for indulging my choice.

1231
01:07:01.800 --> 01:07:02.199
<v Speaker 3>It was good.

1232
01:07:02.199 --> 01:07:05.639
<v Speaker 4>I think if we really never talked about or never

1233
01:07:05.679 --> 01:07:08.320
<v Speaker 4>covered a capitalist realism on an early episode. I'm glad

1234
01:07:08.360 --> 01:07:11.280
<v Speaker 4>we did, and even if we did, it was probably

1235
01:07:11.480 --> 01:07:16.039
<v Speaker 4>appropriate to revisit it. Tune in next week for Kim

1236
01:07:16.119 --> 01:07:20.440
<v Speaker 4>Jong Pills to be back back in the driver's seat,

1237
01:07:21.159 --> 01:07:26.320
<v Speaker 4>and do check out Tony's YouTube channel one dime and

1238
01:07:26.719 --> 01:07:30.400
<v Speaker 4>his podcast one Diime Radio. And yeah, we'll leave it

1239
01:07:30.400 --> 01:07:30.679
<v Speaker 4>at that.

1240
01:07:30.760 --> 01:07:31.079
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

1241
01:07:31.280 --> 01:07:33.719
<v Speaker 1>We should thank our guests for joining us, Thank you

1242
01:07:33.800 --> 01:07:35.559
<v Speaker 1>for Ross for that.

1243
01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:40.239
<v Speaker 2>Hell yeah, I went substitute teacher and didn't get bullied.

1244
01:07:42.320 --> 01:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, win win, all right, chow stop recording
