Speaker 1: This is a clip from the Quantum Guide show.
Speaker 2: You can access the entire episode now on our website
Speaker 2: and all podcast platforms. You sent me a clip which
Speaker 2: was aerial drone footage of his I believe his property
Speaker 2: on the island, and it shows it's pretty compelling. This
Speaker 2: was taken after his so called demos, and it's pretty
Speaker 2: compelling that the actual man behind the construct is still alive.
Speaker 2: And I put the link to that in the description
Speaker 2: notes below. I tried to get a copy of it
Speaker 2: to show during this show, but it didn't happen. I'm
Speaker 2: having technical issues. I recently upgraded to Windows eleven and
Speaker 2: now nothing seems to work anymore, and I'm regretting that.
Speaker 2: But that's another story. So that link is in the
Speaker 2: description below if you folks want to have a look,
Speaker 2: and those of you who are listening on audio, come
Speaker 2: on over and watch the video. And the link to
Speaker 2: this extra bit is actually in all the notes from
Speaker 2: for all the platforms, so I hope you all can
Speaker 2: have a look at that. But you know, I saw
Speaker 2: another video very recently. We can get into this a
Speaker 2: little bit more depth later on in the show Today Ryan,
Speaker 2: where they were saying that the reason behind the construct
Speaker 2: was to keep everybody emotionally involved in that particular story
Speaker 2: and to keep our eyes off a much larger story
Speaker 2: that's also coming down and happening at this time. And
Speaker 2: I thought I sent you a link to it. I
Speaker 2: don't know if you had time to watch it, but
Speaker 2: it was very compelling and I agree with that too.
Speaker 2: But pretty much what they said in that video you
Speaker 2: have said on your podcast, and I think you're right
Speaker 2: on the money. So I'm not saying that these horrible
Speaker 2: things with underaged females. I'm not saying it doesn't happen.
Speaker 2: But what I'm saying is that this has been constructed
Speaker 2: and blown up over time to cover up a whole
Speaker 2: bunch of other things. And I've followed quite a bit
Speaker 2: of the evidence, and I think personally he's a bit
Speaker 2: of a cover or a front for money lundering seems
Speaker 2: to be because nobody's going to hire him for tax advice.
Speaker 2: It's ridiculous. I mean, you'd have to be stupid to
Speaker 2: believe that you would go to a tax person. You
Speaker 2: would go to someone who specializes in that. You wouldn't
Speaker 2: ask some guy who shows up at parties about that.
Speaker 2: That doesn't make any sense to me for the money
Speaker 2: laundering which we're seeing happen all over the world. And
Speaker 2: these people, who I call them the parasite class. I
Speaker 2: will not call them elites. There's nothing elite about them,
Speaker 2: but everything they have they have stolen from humanity, and
Speaker 2: that's why I call them the parasite class. And they're
Speaker 2: constantly finding ways they don't have to follow national rules
Speaker 2: or pay taxes or do any of the things that
Speaker 2: they all expect us to do. And so that sort
Speaker 2: of was my leanning. So I'm not saying I mean,
Speaker 2: you know, my knee jerk reaction, of course, is to
Speaker 2: get really upset about the exploitation of children. Let's face it,
Speaker 2: and they're probably and I'm pretty convinced there is a
Speaker 2: whole way too much of that, oh way too much.
Speaker 2: It's all too much of that going on. But I
Speaker 2: don't think that's the claim to fame for the construct.
Speaker 2: I think the instructor has been carefully constructed in such
Speaker 2: a way as to keep our focus uh wherever the
Speaker 2: powers that be one or focused to be. And that's
Speaker 2: what I think. So I totally agree with you, right.
Speaker 2: I'd love to hear more about your observations.
Speaker 1: You know, it's such a muddled web of misrepresentation with Epstein,
Speaker 1: and that's why I think he's a construct. He's he's
Speaker 1: paying a role. It's literally, you know, live action role play.
Speaker 1: He had a part to. That was his job. You know,
Speaker 1: when people say they can't find any qualified traits to
Speaker 1: his hitch fund, it's because he wasn't making it. He
Speaker 1: wasn't a head fund hedge fund manager in any way,
Speaker 1: shape or form. His job was to play one in
Speaker 1: the world's stage, and he played one very well with
Speaker 1: the jet, the houses, the girls, and you know, doing
Speaker 1: the philanthropical things too, which were a bogus. He had
Speaker 1: a secret science honeypot as well. He would fund and
Speaker 1: go to these venues where he was the philanthropist quote
Speaker 1: unquote funding science. And I mean we're talking about serious philanthropy,
Speaker 1: and he's even been on articles about it. And in
Speaker 1: his estimation he basically said that his exact quotes were,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm a pretty good mathematician. He was kind
Speaker 1: of a boastful guy, and he said that he was
Speaker 1: eager in funding science that the Trump administration had cut
Speaker 1: back on. But what we find is that and I
Speaker 1: don't want to get political, because this is not political
Speaker 1: at all. This honeypot didn't care what side of the
Speaker 1: aisle you were on. He cared about getting in the
Speaker 1: right circles, whether that be getting nine and ten figure
Speaker 1: gifts to science, get money he didn't have, which again
Speaker 1: back to where is this coming from? Acting like a
Speaker 1: super wealthy individual. And he would choose who to fund,
Speaker 1: and he said that he was looking for people that
Speaker 1: we're doing things like building laboratories, fringe science, big institutions.
Speaker 1: He had, of course, has no Stephen Hawking out to
Speaker 1: the island. I mean, absolutely ridiculous, self perpetual waiting scientific
Speaker 1: what they called it was a scientific priesthood. He was
Speaker 1: playing the part of an intelligent guy involved with science. Hey,
Speaker 1: I'm the type of guy that you guys want to
Speaker 1: talk with. I'm the kind of guy you want to know.
Speaker 1: Get me in the circles with other people. And I
Speaker 1: believe this was all to lure people, much like a
Speaker 1: venus fly trap into the honeypot.
Speaker 2: Mm hmmmm. I would agree with you on that one.
Speaker 2: And so that's another way that they were able to
Speaker 2: control people. So they would lure them into these compromising situations,
Speaker 2: film them, record, them whatever, then they've got something to
Speaker 2: hang over them. So I think, yeah, that might have
Speaker 2: been like one of his jobs. And like you said,
Speaker 2: his whole persona was constructed to make him look like
Speaker 2: he was a man of the world and you know,
Speaker 2: a jet setter and with all these high profile people
Speaker 2: and his friends with them all and everything. And now
Speaker 2: I do believe that as a man he had some problems,
Speaker 2: probably sex addiction was one of them, and some other things.
Speaker 2: But today we're dealing more with the construct. So I agree.
Speaker 2: I think he was his role is constructed, and that
Speaker 2: would also explain why they're not doing in depth and
Speaker 2: in depth investigation into him, because he's not a real
Speaker 2: thing now. As far as him going to prison and
Speaker 2: getting un alive, I also think that was a construct.
Speaker 2: What's interesting is what you used to be able to
Speaker 2: find in videos you can't find anymore. And there was
Speaker 2: a lot of evidence that came out around the time
Speaker 2: he had alived himself that said that it was somebody
Speaker 2: else took his place, and that the way his neck
Speaker 2: was broken, he couldn't have done that to himself. But
Speaker 2: then there was footage show waing up like the clip
Speaker 2: you sent me, and I've got that the description below
Speaker 2: of him actually botted, and he is definitely moving around
Speaker 2: and conscious. So I'm wondering, Ryan, if there isn't perhaps
Speaker 2: a private island or who knows what, where these people
Speaker 2: go when their construct is no longer needed, and then
Speaker 2: they can live out the rest of their lives having
Speaker 2: all their whims satisfied and be taken care of as
Speaker 2: part of their contract for doing the job that they're doing.
Speaker 2: But the amount of frenzy whipped up around this man
Speaker 2: and the construct