WEBVTT

1
00:01:51.239 --> 00:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Dire wave. The scientific method cannot justify the scientific method.

2
00:02:12.280 --> 00:03:14.599
<v Speaker 1>Therefore itself, it is a dogmatical presupposition. It's a lovely

3
00:03:14.680 --> 00:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>man voice.

4
00:03:15.360 --> 00:03:19.199
<v Speaker 2>Not a effeminine positive defamation.

5
00:03:19.719 --> 00:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, welcome, we're live. I think should be good. We're here,

6
00:03:27.000 --> 00:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>and today it's a little bit different. We're going to

7
00:03:29.000 --> 00:03:34.199
<v Speaker 1>have my discord with me because I'm scared. I need

8
00:03:34.240 --> 00:03:37.599
<v Speaker 1>all my backup people because I'm afraid of Ejahs and

9
00:03:37.639 --> 00:03:40.919
<v Speaker 1>all the Muslim I'm joking not but we're going to

10
00:03:41.159 --> 00:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>do Q and A or stump or debate or whatever. Now,

11
00:03:46.159 --> 00:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>if you just want to come on voice and ask questions,

12
00:03:49.919 --> 00:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you can do that through the discord. I'll put the

13
00:03:52.039 --> 00:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>link in in a second. If you want to come

14
00:03:55.879 --> 00:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on a video debate, I have a zoom link open

15
00:04:01.199 --> 00:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>as well, and I can send you that link. So

16
00:04:03.120 --> 00:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>we offered. Ejaz said he was ready, he was ready

17
00:04:06.280 --> 00:04:08.759
<v Speaker 1>to go, ready to debate. We've offered for months and

18
00:04:08.800 --> 00:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>months and months to set up a debate with this guy.

19
00:04:11.439 --> 00:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Anyone doing so He says, oh, I don't mean today,

20
00:04:14.960 --> 00:04:20.319
<v Speaker 1>even though he said I'm ready to go. Anyway, we

21
00:04:20.360 --> 00:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>will do Q and A. We'll do Q and A. Also

22
00:04:22.480 --> 00:04:24.399
<v Speaker 1>we have a. We have all the discord wirdos here.

23
00:04:24.399 --> 00:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>What's up?

24
00:04:25.879 --> 00:04:27.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you get debate Jordan Peterson if you want.

25
00:04:27.959 --> 00:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>If he wants, you got him right here.

26
00:04:30.040 --> 00:04:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm ready to debate. I can debate anyone right now,

27
00:04:34.279 --> 00:04:34.879
<v Speaker 2>ready to go.

28
00:04:35.319 --> 00:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>So if you don't want to come on audio, thank you, Jordan. Uh,

29
00:04:39.279 --> 00:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you can also leave me a stream lab super chat

30
00:04:41.959 --> 00:04:46.439
<v Speaker 1>question or challenge right, it's it's the challenge is open.

31
00:04:46.720 --> 00:04:49.519
<v Speaker 1>We make it really easy to debate, Like, it's super

32
00:04:49.560 --> 00:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>easy to come debate. There's no hoops. You don't have

33
00:04:54.920 --> 00:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to jump through hoops to come debate here. It's very easy.

34
00:04:58.519 --> 00:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>And now I've even opened it up to audio, so

35
00:05:03.199 --> 00:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that is the link there. If you want to join

36
00:05:05.040 --> 00:05:07.399
<v Speaker 1>the discord, you will have to be vetted, of course first,

37
00:05:07.399 --> 00:05:11.199
<v Speaker 1>to come in the discord. You can't just everybody can't.

38
00:05:11.240 --> 00:05:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Just pile and read the rules, rules, questions, and then

39
00:05:15.240 --> 00:05:18.519
<v Speaker 1>you'll be vetted. And after you're vetted and we decide

40
00:05:18.560 --> 00:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that you have the balls, we'll let you come in. Yeah,

41
00:05:22.720 --> 00:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>what it toos, you're not late? Welcome?

42
00:05:26.240 --> 00:05:26.480
<v Speaker 3>All right?

43
00:05:26.519 --> 00:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>We got a good crowd here. Be sure to leave

44
00:05:27.920 --> 00:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a like and a thumb up. Well that's the same

45
00:05:30.480 --> 00:05:33.639
<v Speaker 1>thing and then also share it super chats. Thank you,

46
00:05:33.680 --> 00:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>okay as a mod there, he's putting the stream lab

47
00:05:36.120 --> 00:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>superchat there as a rough outline I'll be covering just

48
00:05:39.759 --> 00:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>because we're probably waiting for people to come in if

49
00:05:42.160 --> 00:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>they want to. We got a couple of Roman Catholics

50
00:05:43.879 --> 00:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>in the in the in the discord right now. I

51
00:05:45.720 --> 00:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they're going to come in, but we've

52
00:05:48.000 --> 00:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>got the emergence of the Catholic tradition, the excellent Yarslav

53
00:05:51.680 --> 00:05:53.959
<v Speaker 1>Pelican book. I'll use that as a rough outline for

54
00:05:54.040 --> 00:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>topics to discuss. But you can talk about whatever you

55
00:05:57.199 --> 00:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>want if you want to ask me questions about philosophy,

56
00:06:00.000 --> 00:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>if he challenge me, this is we got. I got

57
00:06:02.720 --> 00:06:07.439
<v Speaker 1>incense burning up in here to make to set the ambiance.

58
00:06:07.480 --> 00:06:09.079
<v Speaker 1>I saw one of them, p u a guys. He

59
00:06:09.120 --> 00:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>always lights incense before he starts his live stream, so

60
00:06:11.720 --> 00:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought i'd rip him off into that. So I've

61
00:06:13.399 --> 00:06:16.959
<v Speaker 1>lit incense. We've got the ambiance. We got the whiteboard here.

62
00:06:19.519 --> 00:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>If you're Muslim, if you're Rumman, Catholic, if you're set

63
00:06:23.040 --> 00:06:27.439
<v Speaker 1>of a contest, if you're Protestant, Calvinist, evangelical, atheist, even

64
00:06:27.480 --> 00:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're Jewish, or you're welcome to come and ask

65
00:06:30.560 --> 00:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>your questions, debate, challenge whatever if you want to. Now

66
00:06:35.040 --> 00:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not smoking weed, it's just incense. Pro If you

67
00:06:38.360 --> 00:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>want to come into the voice chat, go to the discord,

68
00:06:41.720 --> 00:06:45.519
<v Speaker 1>join the discord. There's the link at my Twitter. Let

69
00:06:45.560 --> 00:06:49.480
<v Speaker 1>me see if I get the actual just the discord link. Now,

70
00:06:49.639 --> 00:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you know you gotta go to the you gotta go

71
00:06:51.720 --> 00:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Twitter. That way, we can't have we can't

72
00:06:55.759 --> 00:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>just have everybody pulling in there, so you got to

73
00:06:57.319 --> 00:07:02.319
<v Speaker 1>go to my Twitter. Catholic nonsense. Somebody said the chat anyway,

74
00:07:03.160 --> 00:07:05.839
<v Speaker 1>what's up discord? Anybody? Is anybody in the discord right now?

75
00:07:05.879 --> 00:07:07.759
<v Speaker 1>I know we got a full room. Does anybody want

76
00:07:07.800 --> 00:07:10.879
<v Speaker 1>to come on the live stream and give us some

77
00:07:10.959 --> 00:07:12.959
<v Speaker 1>chat material, questions, challenges?

78
00:07:20.199 --> 00:07:20.759
<v Speaker 3>Silence?

79
00:07:24.759 --> 00:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean we had I know, I know. So we

80
00:07:26.439 --> 00:07:28.519
<v Speaker 1>opened this up today because we had a lot of

81
00:07:28.600 --> 00:07:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Muslims talking and you know, making a lot of fuss,

82
00:07:31.839 --> 00:07:33.959
<v Speaker 1>and so we opened it up. We had two or

83
00:07:33.959 --> 00:07:37.519
<v Speaker 1>three Muslims talking smack all over Twitter. And then I said,

84
00:07:37.519 --> 00:07:39.759
<v Speaker 1>come on, I even I'll even let you on here.

85
00:07:40.120 --> 00:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Well we'll do a live stream. We'll start at the

86
00:07:41.759 --> 00:07:44.519
<v Speaker 1>live stream, come on and debate Bra, debate me, Bra,

87
00:07:45.480 --> 00:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and the dudes just left. We at least the dude

88
00:07:48.040 --> 00:07:52.199
<v Speaker 1>that was talking to Smack left, So so I thought

89
00:07:52.240 --> 00:07:54.959
<v Speaker 1>we were going to have some That link has expired. No,

90
00:07:55.079 --> 00:07:57.319
<v Speaker 1>it's not. Go to my Twitter. At the top is

91
00:07:58.000 --> 00:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>an unexpired link. If that link was wrong, then go

92
00:08:01.240 --> 00:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to my Twitter and then the latest link is not expired.

93
00:08:04.920 --> 00:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't be expired. It's an hour old, not expired.

94
00:08:09.800 --> 00:08:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Uh all right, let me try. Let me get another

95
00:08:12.480 --> 00:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>link for you guys, and it's expired. Okay, rest in peace.

96
00:08:21.600 --> 00:08:24.519
<v Speaker 1>Let me get another link that shouldn't be expired after

97
00:08:24.600 --> 00:08:36.759
<v Speaker 1>hour though, I don't know whatever. We got Father Deacon

98
00:08:36.799 --> 00:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and Ias in the house. We got Lewis. We got

99
00:08:38.600 --> 00:08:41.559
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our old old discord friends all here

100
00:08:41.600 --> 00:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>with us, old timers, old timers because of course we're

101
00:08:49.440 --> 00:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>all scared. We got to have a mob, right we have.

102
00:08:51.480 --> 00:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>We have to have backup because none of us individually

103
00:08:54.159 --> 00:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>can handle anybody in a debate.

104
00:08:56.639 --> 00:09:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Or Yeah, finding Muslim people to debate is like trying

105
00:09:01.879 --> 00:09:04.200
<v Speaker 4>to herd cats.

106
00:09:06.159 --> 00:09:10.480
<v Speaker 2>We can't find them. Right. We got the chebar Ali debate.

107
00:09:10.840 --> 00:09:13.919
<v Speaker 4>Okay, he did great in that I think shaver ally

108
00:09:15.039 --> 00:09:20.159
<v Speaker 4>comported himself honorarily. And then now suddenly everyone's scared. Now

109
00:09:20.200 --> 00:09:23.159
<v Speaker 4>it's no debate, no one debate Jane, and we.

110
00:09:23.080 --> 00:09:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Can't find them.

111
00:09:24.000 --> 00:09:26.759
<v Speaker 4>So it's like they accused lots of ox Christians is

112
00:09:26.799 --> 00:09:27.440
<v Speaker 4>being scared.

113
00:09:28.600 --> 00:09:30.039
<v Speaker 2>We offered the debate.

114
00:09:30.279 --> 00:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've said we've done three debates with Muslims, now,

115
00:09:32.720 --> 00:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>so how are we scared?

116
00:09:33.480 --> 00:09:35.200
<v Speaker 2>It's just nonsense, yeah, exactly.

117
00:09:35.279 --> 00:09:40.600
<v Speaker 4>And then they set up conditions that they want to groups.

118
00:09:40.279 --> 00:09:40.919
<v Speaker 2>For us to jump.

119
00:09:41.039 --> 00:09:43.519
<v Speaker 1>You don't debate me on a blood moon, on a leap,

120
00:09:43.559 --> 00:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>ear in the middle of Texas in an underground cave

121
00:09:48.360 --> 00:09:52.759
<v Speaker 1>at two am. Then and we have to debate only

122
00:09:52.759 --> 00:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>in morse code I want to be and it has.

123
00:09:56.320 --> 00:09:58.960
<v Speaker 4>To be you have to wear seal skins and it

124
00:09:59.039 --> 00:10:00.480
<v Speaker 4>has to be more code.

125
00:10:00.519 --> 00:10:03.120
<v Speaker 2>But you have to write haiku and then you have

126
00:10:03.200 --> 00:10:04.480
<v Speaker 2>to record that morse.

127
00:10:04.399 --> 00:10:07.279
<v Speaker 4>Code onto slate tablets, and then you have to have

128
00:10:07.320 --> 00:10:08.080
<v Speaker 4>a blind.

129
00:10:07.799 --> 00:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Man readout has to be translated into Hebrew and then

130
00:10:10.519 --> 00:10:12.919
<v Speaker 1>written on vellum.

131
00:10:13.000 --> 00:10:17.639
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's like okay, it's like, how about the.

132
00:10:21.480 --> 00:10:23.679
<v Speaker 2>Next thing. It would be give me ten million dollars

133
00:10:23.720 --> 00:10:24.519
<v Speaker 2>and I'll debate you.

134
00:10:24.799 --> 00:10:27.559
<v Speaker 1>That'll be the next thing, I require a debater's fee

135
00:10:27.639 --> 00:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of half a million dollars to appear.

136
00:10:30.360 --> 00:10:37.840
<v Speaker 5>I have three goods and four CAFs.

137
00:10:37.919 --> 00:10:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Please, I would also my way, all right, so read

138
00:10:47.919 --> 00:10:50.679
<v Speaker 2>check out? Yeah as well, guys.

139
00:10:50.639 --> 00:10:54.399
<v Speaker 1>The debate has to be done in sign language or Braille.

140
00:10:55.320 --> 00:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>If you don't do an animal sacrifice, if you don't

141
00:10:57.519 --> 00:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>do it in braill, it's because you're low.

142
00:10:58.759 --> 00:11:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Like yeah, all.

143
00:11:03.840 --> 00:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Right, so, uh, you guys, just you guys interrupt me.

144
00:11:09.320 --> 00:11:11.799
<v Speaker 1>You guys can interrupt me if somebody comes in, if

145
00:11:11.840 --> 00:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>they want to do is there anybody who has any

146
00:11:15.279 --> 00:11:19.919
<v Speaker 1>questions or challenges or or debate topics issues? I think

147
00:11:19.919 --> 00:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I shared the newer link, by the way, so there's

148
00:11:22.039 --> 00:11:24.279
<v Speaker 1>the new link if you want to come in. Uh,

149
00:11:24.279 --> 00:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>there will be people vetting people right now, so you

150
00:11:27.120 --> 00:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>guys can come in. I'm not talking to any I'm

151
00:11:29.120 --> 00:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>talking to you. Who am I talking to to you?

152
00:11:31.879 --> 00:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>In the chat?

153
00:11:32.559 --> 00:11:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Bro?

154
00:11:32.879 --> 00:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>You Byzantine in the chat in the discord chat. You

155
00:11:37.440 --> 00:11:39.639
<v Speaker 1>can come on. It's open, dude, We've got to open.

156
00:11:39.919 --> 00:11:42.320
<v Speaker 6>Can you tell people to change the AVI? Is the

157
00:11:42.440 --> 00:11:46.159
<v Speaker 6>profile pictures on Discord from the default because we kind.

158
00:11:46.039 --> 00:11:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Of have a rule against that.

159
00:11:47.120 --> 00:11:50.799
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, so if you come into the dis you

160
00:11:50.799 --> 00:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>come into the discord, you got to do our rules,

161
00:11:53.320 --> 00:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, So when you leave you can go back

162
00:11:55.360 --> 00:11:57.759
<v Speaker 1>to whatever you want, but in our discord, please follow

163
00:11:57.799 --> 00:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the rules.

164
00:11:58.799 --> 00:12:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Uh have a charge.

165
00:12:00.279 --> 00:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we don't really do no hintai avatars, no, no whatever,

166
00:12:08.799 --> 00:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>there we go.

167
00:12:10.759 --> 00:12:11.960
<v Speaker 2>No anime advatars.

168
00:12:12.080 --> 00:12:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we don't do that.

169
00:12:13.080 --> 00:12:17.279
<v Speaker 2>You know this small us in the general.

170
00:12:17.440 --> 00:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's that's the guy from a couple of nights

171
00:12:20.120 --> 00:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>ago that we spent the whole night with. So, uh,

172
00:12:23.279 --> 00:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>he says he's going to come in. Here we get

173
00:12:24.840 --> 00:12:27.399
<v Speaker 1>a uni E who says he'll come in. But we

174
00:12:27.480 --> 00:12:29.879
<v Speaker 1>had this discussion for about three hours the other night.

175
00:12:30.000 --> 00:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So now being mean to the guy, I'm just saying,

176
00:12:33.559 --> 00:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I know where that chet's going to go,

177
00:12:35.240 --> 00:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>But if nobody's going to come in, I'll just kind

178
00:12:39.960 --> 00:12:43.639
<v Speaker 1>of like wait until people come and I'll talk about

179
00:12:44.320 --> 00:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the notes from Pelicon.

180
00:12:48.039 --> 00:12:53.000
<v Speaker 7>Go ahead, Yeah, Jay, So I've been watching your stuff

181
00:12:53.000 --> 00:12:53.480
<v Speaker 7>for a while.

182
00:12:53.519 --> 00:12:57.279
<v Speaker 2>It's really interesting, But I was just wondering if you

183
00:12:57.320 --> 00:12:58.480
<v Speaker 2>could like point to.

184
00:13:00.559 --> 00:13:03.679
<v Speaker 7>In the early church, any points where a father is

185
00:13:03.679 --> 00:13:07.159
<v Speaker 7>saying that, you know, asking for the intercession of saints

186
00:13:07.200 --> 00:13:11.679
<v Speaker 7>is Okay, it.

187
00:13:11.639 --> 00:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Gets explicitly mentioned up by the time that you're dealing

188
00:13:17.480 --> 00:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>with Augustine or with the Cappadocian saints Cyril in the

189
00:13:21.440 --> 00:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>categorical lectures I think mentions it. I know Augustine mentions

190
00:13:25.360 --> 00:13:29.519
<v Speaker 1>it explicitly in multiple places in his writings. So yeah,

191
00:13:29.559 --> 00:13:31.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean you can. You should be able to pretty

192
00:13:31.399 --> 00:13:34.399
<v Speaker 1>easily google like church Father's intercession of the Saints, like

193
00:13:34.440 --> 00:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not really too controversial of a topic.

194
00:13:39.639 --> 00:13:42.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, I mean I guess in my own research

195
00:13:42.559 --> 00:13:47.919
<v Speaker 7>when I look into it, it seems kind of not

196
00:13:48.120 --> 00:13:50.039
<v Speaker 7>like explicit, if that makes any sense.

197
00:13:50.399 --> 00:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, it is explicit when it becomes a question, right,

198
00:13:53.679 --> 00:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>So by the time of Jerome, actually Jerome talks about

199
00:13:56.480 --> 00:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it explicitly when he writes multiple letters against like Vigilius

200
00:14:01.559 --> 00:14:06.519
<v Speaker 1>and the other guy who questions relics and saints, and

201
00:14:06.559 --> 00:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>he writes this really funny treatise just making fun of

202
00:14:08.720 --> 00:14:11.799
<v Speaker 1>the guy, telling him that he's basically possessed and he

203
00:14:11.840 --> 00:14:13.799
<v Speaker 1>actually just needs to go touch the relics to get

204
00:14:13.840 --> 00:14:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the demon out of him. So, I mean, he makes

205
00:14:17.200 --> 00:14:20.639
<v Speaker 1>other arguments, but so Jerome has treatises explicitly on it.

206
00:14:21.639 --> 00:14:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Augustine mentions it. I'm pretty sure it's in the catechortical

207
00:14:24.480 --> 00:14:29.399
<v Speaker 1>lectures of Saint Cyril. But if by explicit mention, we

208
00:14:29.440 --> 00:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>can't think of it like there has to in the

209
00:14:32.399 --> 00:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>first century be a theological defense of every doctrine, or

210
00:14:37.360 --> 00:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I won't believe it because there's all kinds of things

211
00:14:39.320 --> 00:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that we wouldn't believe, right, I mean, we don't have

212
00:14:41.559 --> 00:14:45.159
<v Speaker 1>a first second century mention of n hypostatized, but this

213
00:14:45.279 --> 00:14:49.039
<v Speaker 1>becomes a crucial chrystological statement by the time of Saint

214
00:14:49.039 --> 00:14:51.519
<v Speaker 1>Cyril and afterwards. So it's just it's just kind of

215
00:14:51.559 --> 00:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>like a bogus criteria to argue unless I see it

216
00:14:56.360 --> 00:14:59.519
<v Speaker 1>explicitly defended or stated, you know, in the post appisode

217
00:14:59.519 --> 00:15:01.919
<v Speaker 1>period on will believe it. Well, that's ludicrous. Nobody actually

218
00:15:01.960 --> 00:15:05.519
<v Speaker 1>follows that. Like there's all kinds of crystological dogmas that

219
00:15:05.840 --> 00:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>most people believe that you wouldn't believe because it's not

220
00:15:08.240 --> 00:15:09.919
<v Speaker 1>stated in the first, second, third century.

221
00:15:13.000 --> 00:15:16.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, thanks, just coming for a Processant background.

222
00:15:16.080 --> 00:15:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Right, understand, understand, I mean, but I mean there's no uh,

223
00:15:19.000 --> 00:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I could just turn that around to Protestant

224
00:15:20.759 --> 00:15:22.639
<v Speaker 1>and say, where is the Protestant canon in the first

225
00:15:22.679 --> 00:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>second third century.

226
00:15:25.480 --> 00:15:27.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, of course, that's that's one thing that I've been

227
00:15:27.639 --> 00:15:32.039
<v Speaker 7>sort of struggling with and you know, looking and listening

228
00:15:32.080 --> 00:15:35.039
<v Speaker 7>to your talks, you know, and help me out understanding it.

229
00:15:35.559 --> 00:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Word right, Thanks, no problem. Yeah, so we got you're

230
00:15:41.559 --> 00:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>our first caller in the pseudo live call in stream. Welcome.

231
00:15:45.879 --> 00:15:48.639
<v Speaker 1>You were my first ever. I don't really like the

232
00:15:48.679 --> 00:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>idea of calling streams, but whatever, I thought it'd be

233
00:15:51.000 --> 00:15:51.639
<v Speaker 1>fun to try it out.

234
00:15:52.399 --> 00:15:55.360
<v Speaker 5>Long time listeners, Yeah, you're on the air.

235
00:15:57.519 --> 00:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I've got the documents, folks, you're on the air all right.

236
00:16:05.159 --> 00:16:07.159
<v Speaker 1>By the way, only an intercession of the saints, I

237
00:16:07.159 --> 00:16:09.559
<v Speaker 1>mean that's even in scripture, right, It's even it was

238
00:16:09.600 --> 00:16:12.039
<v Speaker 1>even in the Jewish tradition prior to the Church, right.

239
00:16:12.120 --> 00:16:13.679
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not saying that's true, because I'm just saying

240
00:16:13.720 --> 00:16:17.919
<v Speaker 1>there's early attestations to that. There's prayer, prayers for the dead,

241
00:16:17.919 --> 00:16:22.159
<v Speaker 1>and Maccabee's there's the idea of the intercession of the saints.

242
00:16:22.840 --> 00:16:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Just comes from the idea of the intercession of saints

243
00:16:24.759 --> 00:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>on earth. Read the Book of Amos where he intercedes,

244
00:16:26.879 --> 00:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and read you know, when Abraham intercedes, he saves the city. Well,

245
00:16:31.039 --> 00:16:33.039
<v Speaker 1>in the Book of the Apocalypse four and five. The

246
00:16:33.080 --> 00:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>saints aren't dead. They're in heaven interceding, so they continue

247
00:16:36.399 --> 00:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the work of salvation with us as they're in heaven.

248
00:16:41.919 --> 00:16:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Exactly.

249
00:16:42.360 --> 00:16:44.480
<v Speaker 8>That's also in the Book of James. In the Book

250
00:16:44.519 --> 00:16:47.559
<v Speaker 8>of James, at some point Saint James, because of the Lord,

251
00:16:47.559 --> 00:16:49.799
<v Speaker 8>says that we have to pray for one another. And

252
00:16:49.840 --> 00:16:52.960
<v Speaker 8>in other places we know that people, even after the

253
00:16:53.039 --> 00:16:55.879
<v Speaker 8>physically dies, alive in Christ. For if you can pray

254
00:16:55.879 --> 00:16:59.000
<v Speaker 8>for one another, you can still do it on one

255
00:16:59.159 --> 00:17:02.679
<v Speaker 8>specifically sat person is dead. And Saint Jame's also mentions

256
00:17:02.799 --> 00:17:07.319
<v Speaker 8>the fact that the prey of the Righteous are especially powerful.

257
00:17:07.440 --> 00:17:12.079
<v Speaker 2>Yes, exactly, good prayer. So this is a scriptural there's

258
00:17:12.079 --> 00:17:13.279
<v Speaker 2>a real spiritual.

259
00:17:12.880 --> 00:17:15.039
<v Speaker 8>Basis for all of it, and we can see it

260
00:17:15.039 --> 00:17:17.960
<v Speaker 8>being attested in the early history of the Church and

261
00:17:18.000 --> 00:17:19.240
<v Speaker 8>even in the Old Covenant.

262
00:17:19.559 --> 00:17:20.680
<v Speaker 2>There's a full continuity.

263
00:17:21.440 --> 00:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Right. Gert for three dollars says, what do you think

264
00:17:25.359 --> 00:17:28.680
<v Speaker 1>about lucid dreams? Uh, we don't really. I mean there

265
00:17:28.960 --> 00:17:30.799
<v Speaker 1>are lucid dreams. I've had lucid dreams, but we don't

266
00:17:30.799 --> 00:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>really pay attention to dreams and visions and this kind

267
00:17:33.279 --> 00:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, which is not say it can never be done.

268
00:17:35.240 --> 00:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But you need to be under the guidance of a

269
00:17:36.960 --> 00:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>spiritual father to be kind of looking into that kind

270
00:17:40.000 --> 00:17:43.759
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, because we are very prone to delusion, and

271
00:17:43.839 --> 00:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>so most of the Holy Fathers and the Elders and

272
00:17:47.440 --> 00:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>our tradition warns against following dreams and visions and omens

273
00:17:51.519 --> 00:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and this kind of stuff because we're just so easily

274
00:17:55.119 --> 00:17:57.880
<v Speaker 1>deceived by that stuff. Father Deacon, you would agree with that.

275
00:17:58.960 --> 00:18:06.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, absolutely absolute. It's funny because in my department up

276
00:18:06.960 --> 00:18:11.759
<v Speaker 5>in the office, you know, the Social Sciences building, and

277
00:18:11.960 --> 00:18:14.880
<v Speaker 5>I was disgusting with one of the professors I think

278
00:18:14.920 --> 00:18:20.000
<v Speaker 5>they were a psycho ecology professor, and they have this

279
00:18:20.279 --> 00:18:22.480
<v Speaker 5>like reading group and they said, one of the things

280
00:18:22.480 --> 00:18:28.920
<v Speaker 5>we do is we interpret dreams. And so this issue

281
00:18:29.000 --> 00:18:31.240
<v Speaker 5>kind of came up from an Orthodox perspective.

282
00:18:31.839 --> 00:18:33.519
<v Speaker 2>So you have these groups of people that.

283
00:18:33.559 --> 00:18:40.240
<v Speaker 5>Will interpret dreams and trying to attached mean and so

284
00:18:40.400 --> 00:18:45.200
<v Speaker 5>we Orthodox shy away from that just because you could

285
00:18:45.240 --> 00:18:48.359
<v Speaker 5>think about all kinds of crazy stuff that the conclusions

286
00:18:48.359 --> 00:18:54.079
<v Speaker 5>that you could come up from.

287
00:18:51.839 --> 00:18:57.640
<v Speaker 2>That's not something that we particularly would suggest is safe

288
00:18:57.680 --> 00:18:57.920
<v Speaker 2>to do.

289
00:18:58.519 --> 00:19:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you one go ahead.

290
00:19:01.079 --> 00:19:02.960
<v Speaker 4>I was just going to say, also, when you know,

291
00:19:03.039 --> 00:19:05.440
<v Speaker 4>when a woman talks about our dreams, you just want

292
00:19:05.480 --> 00:19:06.680
<v Speaker 4>to shoot yourself in the head.

293
00:19:06.960 --> 00:19:09.640
<v Speaker 2>So boring, So like, we don't really want to encourage.

294
00:19:09.279 --> 00:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Men to do that either, Father Deacon, could you give

295
00:19:13.519 --> 00:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>us a brief because we have a lot of people,

296
00:19:14.920 --> 00:19:16.519
<v Speaker 1>I think in our chat who might be new to

297
00:19:16.559 --> 00:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>these topics, just a brief explanation of maybe, in contrast

298
00:19:20.480 --> 00:19:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to Protestantism or Roman Catholicism, what is the spiritual Father

299
00:19:23.960 --> 00:19:25.559
<v Speaker 1>and why is that important? Orthodoxy?

300
00:19:27.039 --> 00:19:32.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So one thing that excuse me, that we worked

301
00:19:32.200 --> 00:19:38.160
<v Speaker 5>about are keenly aware of in our practice and our theology.

302
00:19:37.680 --> 00:19:45.279
<v Speaker 2>Is what we call spiritual delusion. Priest and all of

303
00:19:45.359 --> 00:19:45.759
<v Speaker 2>us have it.

304
00:19:47.119 --> 00:19:52.720
<v Speaker 5>And what I think so dangerous about spiritual delusion is

305
00:19:52.759 --> 00:19:58.079
<v Speaker 5>that you don't know you have it, Whereas a temptation,

306
00:19:58.240 --> 00:20:02.680
<v Speaker 5>it's very easy to IDENTI that the fact that you

307
00:20:02.799 --> 00:20:08.559
<v Speaker 5>could actually be being manipulated by demons under the guise

308
00:20:08.640 --> 00:20:15.680
<v Speaker 5>of something holy and spiritual impure is quite dangerous. Now,

309
00:20:16.559 --> 00:20:22.720
<v Speaker 5>as far as I know, Protestants don't even have a concept.

310
00:20:22.319 --> 00:20:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Of having spiritual delusion.

311
00:20:24.480 --> 00:20:27.599
<v Speaker 5>They may talk about temptations and correct me if I'm wrong.

312
00:20:28.000 --> 00:20:30.440
<v Speaker 5>In my study of Roman Catholicism, I don't think it's

313
00:20:30.480 --> 00:20:37.240
<v Speaker 5>even addressed, is a concept of something existing. And I

314
00:20:37.319 --> 00:20:42.200
<v Speaker 5>think it's really important that not only do Protestants not

315
00:20:42.319 --> 00:20:47.079
<v Speaker 5>have a concept of being spiritually deluded, but have no

316
00:20:47.319 --> 00:20:51.240
<v Speaker 5>mechanism on how to cure that and treat them. And

317
00:20:51.359 --> 00:20:54.799
<v Speaker 5>I would say this is something that's so important in Orthodoxy.

318
00:20:56.960 --> 00:21:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Why we have a spiritual Father is that if we.

319
00:21:01.119 --> 00:21:05.440
<v Speaker 5>All assume I'm constantly being manipulated by demons, not only

320
00:21:05.480 --> 00:21:10.920
<v Speaker 5>in temptations, but being spiritually deluded and thinking that oh,

321
00:21:11.359 --> 00:21:16.599
<v Speaker 5>this is from God, or this is something holy that

322
00:21:16.680 --> 00:21:20.880
<v Speaker 5>I should be doing, maybe I should maybe God's telling

323
00:21:20.920 --> 00:21:24.920
<v Speaker 5>me to interpret people's dreams or something like that. How

324
00:21:24.960 --> 00:21:30.200
<v Speaker 5>do you know that you're not deluded? Well, you don't

325
00:21:30.279 --> 00:21:33.920
<v Speaker 5>if you are the problem. And so this is what's

326
00:21:33.920 --> 00:21:37.920
<v Speaker 5>so important about having a spiritual Father is there's somebody

327
00:21:38.039 --> 00:21:44.000
<v Speaker 5>who's experienced and has the credential spiritually speaking, that can

328
00:21:44.440 --> 00:21:48.640
<v Speaker 5>have proper discernment and the way that spiritual delusion and

329
00:21:48.680 --> 00:21:54.960
<v Speaker 5>the whole spiritual progress as well is acquired through obedience

330
00:21:55.000 --> 00:21:58.119
<v Speaker 5>and repentance With an Orthodoxy, so we're really going to

331
00:21:58.119 --> 00:22:03.960
<v Speaker 5>stress that means we don't rely on our own abilities.

332
00:22:04.839 --> 00:22:09.279
<v Speaker 5>In fact, we're going to admit we're incapable of healing

333
00:22:09.319 --> 00:22:12.079
<v Speaker 5>ourselves and getting ourselves out.

334
00:22:11.839 --> 00:22:14.319
<v Speaker 2>Of the you know, the muck.

335
00:22:15.200 --> 00:22:19.279
<v Speaker 5>And so what we turn to is an advanced physician

336
00:22:19.319 --> 00:22:23.200
<v Speaker 5>of souls who's experienced, and.

337
00:22:23.240 --> 00:22:25.240
<v Speaker 2>We make ourselves obedience.

338
00:22:25.279 --> 00:22:29.160
<v Speaker 5>So, as we say in Orthodoxy, there is no spiritual problem.

339
00:22:29.200 --> 00:22:30.079
<v Speaker 2>You can read all.

340
00:22:29.960 --> 00:22:33.319
<v Speaker 5>The theology books that you want, You can go to

341
00:22:33.359 --> 00:22:38.480
<v Speaker 5>school and get all the degrees and never make any

342
00:22:38.519 --> 00:22:42.599
<v Speaker 5>spiritual progress. So the whole point of Orthodoxy is to

343
00:22:42.799 --> 00:22:46.480
<v Speaker 5>make spiritual progress to heal ourselves.

344
00:22:45.880 --> 00:22:50.039
<v Speaker 2>And you need a physician. And so you make.

345
00:22:49.920 --> 00:22:54.079
<v Speaker 5>Yourself obedient, even as hard as it may be that

346
00:22:54.279 --> 00:22:56.440
<v Speaker 5>your spiritual father tells you something you're like, I don't

347
00:22:56.440 --> 00:22:59.680
<v Speaker 5>agree with that. Part of the obedience is I'm no

348
00:22:59.759 --> 00:23:02.160
<v Speaker 5>longer going to trust in my own abilities, and I'm

349
00:23:02.200 --> 00:23:05.079
<v Speaker 5>going to listen to the spiritual Father. And because the

350
00:23:05.119 --> 00:23:10.440
<v Speaker 5>spiritual Father, the priest is a sacrament, there is grace bestowed.

351
00:23:10.559 --> 00:23:14.759
<v Speaker 5>So even in the faults of individual men is priests,

352
00:23:15.200 --> 00:23:20.400
<v Speaker 5>the grace of God still comes through that sacrament and

353
00:23:20.480 --> 00:23:21.680
<v Speaker 5>that office.

354
00:23:21.880 --> 00:23:22.319
<v Speaker 3>And so.

355
00:23:24.359 --> 00:23:29.960
<v Speaker 5>When you're obedient to your spiritual Father, you're blessed. You're

356
00:23:30.000 --> 00:23:34.319
<v Speaker 5>blessed by God, and you begin to again, a spiritual

357
00:23:34.359 --> 00:23:38.599
<v Speaker 5>father is somebody that's like a counselor and a doctor

358
00:23:38.640 --> 00:23:43.519
<v Speaker 5>that knows you, knows your spiritual medical history. And this

359
00:23:43.599 --> 00:23:45.880
<v Speaker 5>is why what you don't want to do is being

360
00:23:46.000 --> 00:23:50.240
<v Speaker 5>jumping around from different priests and making confessions, and you

361
00:23:50.440 --> 00:23:55.519
<v Speaker 5>need one spiritual doctor who is taking care.

362
00:23:55.400 --> 00:23:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Of you and can help you in your own repentance.

363
00:23:59.839 --> 00:24:03.640
<v Speaker 5>So I'd say that's something unique about Orthodox that not

364
00:24:03.759 --> 00:24:07.240
<v Speaker 5>only do we have the concept that we're all spiritually diluted,

365
00:24:07.519 --> 00:24:11.319
<v Speaker 5>we have the mechanism in place in the structure of

366
00:24:11.319 --> 00:24:13.480
<v Speaker 5>the church over the last two thousand years for dealing

367
00:24:13.559 --> 00:24:16.359
<v Speaker 5>with that. So that's not something a lot of people

368
00:24:16.359 --> 00:24:16.839
<v Speaker 5>talk about.

369
00:24:16.839 --> 00:24:18.519
<v Speaker 2>But I'm Jay, I'm glad you brought that up.

370
00:24:19.559 --> 00:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, we got some questions about that because people

371
00:24:22.480 --> 00:24:25.039
<v Speaker 1>thought that I was saying that you can't talk about

372
00:24:25.039 --> 00:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a dream. No, what I said was that it's in

373
00:24:27.240 --> 00:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the Orthodox tradition, you have a guide, right, Paul talks

374
00:24:31.200 --> 00:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>about being Timothy's spiritual father, So you have a guide

375
00:24:34.720 --> 00:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that you know helps you sort of discern who's actually

376
00:24:38.279 --> 00:24:42.599
<v Speaker 1>been down the road already. That's the point here. It's

377
00:24:42.640 --> 00:24:44.519
<v Speaker 1>not that you can't talk about these things. In fact,

378
00:24:44.519 --> 00:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you should talk about these things with your spiritual father. Now,

379
00:24:47.240 --> 00:24:50.839
<v Speaker 1>it is correct that a lot of times it's hard

380
00:24:50.880 --> 00:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>to find a spiritual father, especially in America, so that's difficult.

381
00:24:55.799 --> 00:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Father Deacon. If you're not talking, can you mute because

382
00:24:58.200 --> 00:25:00.759
<v Speaker 1>there's kind of like a staticky f back and whatnot.

383
00:25:00.759 --> 00:25:03.400
<v Speaker 1>That's okay, but you're welcome to definitely talk. But thank

384
00:25:03.440 --> 00:25:06.279
<v Speaker 1>you for that. So, by the way, and the guys

385
00:25:06.319 --> 00:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in the chat, I'm not saying you can't talk about that,

386
00:25:08.240 --> 00:25:11.559
<v Speaker 1>but and there's Lewis and Kai and Grido. There's a

387
00:25:11.559 --> 00:25:15.359
<v Speaker 1>guy who's a Roman Catholic named Tony g He says

388
00:25:15.400 --> 00:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to get in the discord. Oh okay, Tony,

389
00:25:22.039 --> 00:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>are you there? And for those yeah, hold on for

390
00:25:26.519 --> 00:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the hold on. If you're not talking, please mute. Guys

391
00:25:30.920 --> 00:25:35.039
<v Speaker 1>in the YouTube chat, this is discord, all right. It's

392
00:25:35.119 --> 00:25:37.079
<v Speaker 1>not a guest on the show. If you want to

393
00:25:37.119 --> 00:25:41.079
<v Speaker 1>come into the discord and chat, you're welcome to. As

394
00:25:41.119 --> 00:25:43.759
<v Speaker 1>of now, it's ghetto set up, so I don't have

395
00:25:43.799 --> 00:25:45.599
<v Speaker 1>a better way to do it, so there we go

396
00:25:45.599 --> 00:25:46.519
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. Guy, what's up?

397
00:25:46.519 --> 00:25:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Bro?

398
00:25:47.920 --> 00:25:49.960
<v Speaker 9>Hey Jay, I'm a Roman Catholic bit of a layman.

399
00:25:50.039 --> 00:25:53.039
<v Speaker 9>I just had a quick question. You often say a

400
00:25:53.079 --> 00:25:55.680
<v Speaker 9>movie portray real life. I appreciate the work you do

401
00:25:55.720 --> 00:25:57.640
<v Speaker 9>as far as the esoteric work. I just wanted to

402
00:25:57.680 --> 00:26:01.200
<v Speaker 9>know the Orthodoxy position on spiritual battle as far as

403
00:26:01.200 --> 00:26:04.680
<v Speaker 9>demonic possessions and you know, demonic things that are in

404
00:26:04.759 --> 00:26:07.680
<v Speaker 9>living people's houses, because you know, we always see Roman Catholic.

405
00:26:07.440 --> 00:26:08.519
<v Speaker 2>Priests the forefront.

406
00:26:08.640 --> 00:26:11.359
<v Speaker 9>As far as handling this battle, I just wanted to

407
00:26:11.359 --> 00:26:13.200
<v Speaker 9>know the Orthodoxy position on debt.

408
00:26:13.400 --> 00:26:24.119
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, if you're not talking pretty mute, yeah, yeah.

409
00:26:24.319 --> 00:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Of course Orthodox Orthodoxy does house blessings. The priests do

410
00:26:27.400 --> 00:26:29.039
<v Speaker 1>this like once a year they go around and do

411
00:26:29.079 --> 00:26:31.599
<v Speaker 1>house blessing, So there's there's no difference between the Orthodox

412
00:26:31.640 --> 00:26:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and Catholic view of that kind of stuff of sacramental theology,

413
00:26:36.720 --> 00:26:40.200
<v Speaker 1>blessing the house, blessing water, blessing rivers. I mean, this

414
00:26:40.279 --> 00:26:43.079
<v Speaker 1>is very common in the Orthodox Church. So of course

415
00:26:43.079 --> 00:26:45.319
<v Speaker 1>we believe in the reality of spiritual warfare. I mean

416
00:26:45.359 --> 00:26:50.079
<v Speaker 1>all of the spiritual ascetic writing is about battling the demons.

417
00:26:50.119 --> 00:26:56.440
<v Speaker 1>If you read Larsay's trilogy, I mean Larchais wrote this

418
00:26:56.559 --> 00:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>gigantic trilogy Therapy of Spiritual Illness, and it's all about

419
00:27:00.880 --> 00:27:04.319
<v Speaker 1>how all of the vices, you could say, are kind

420
00:27:04.359 --> 00:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of like battling demons. This is all just from the

421
00:27:07.240 --> 00:27:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Father's philocalia. So I would argue that really Orthodoxy is

422
00:27:11.720 --> 00:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>who continues this tradition. I mean, we have a lot

423
00:27:14.000 --> 00:27:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of monastics in Orthodoxy, Monasticism and ro Catholicism is basically vanishing.

424
00:27:19.599 --> 00:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>So I would say, definitely check out somebody like a father,

425
00:27:23.759 --> 00:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>but not Father, but Jean Claude Larcher therapy of spiritual illnesses,

426
00:27:28.000 --> 00:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>which would answer your question.

427
00:27:31.839 --> 00:27:33.960
<v Speaker 2>I definitely appreciate the comments.

428
00:27:34.319 --> 00:27:34.519
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

429
00:27:36.480 --> 00:27:40.599
<v Speaker 5>Also, Father Georgia Korro is really good at He's an

430
00:27:40.680 --> 00:27:48.880
<v Speaker 5>Orthodox priest that has a lot of experience with possessions

431
00:27:48.920 --> 00:27:50.119
<v Speaker 5>and exorcisms.

432
00:27:50.359 --> 00:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that's who you mentioned in the past. We

433
00:27:52.200 --> 00:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>need to do it interview with him, Yes, exactly, Ulson says,

434
00:27:57.240 --> 00:28:01.839
<v Speaker 1>for seven dollars, here's my imp to roasting you. I'm

435
00:28:01.920 --> 00:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>late to the game. People won't debate you because you're

436
00:28:04.519 --> 00:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>doing brain keto royds. No, sorry, bro, that's that's not

437
00:28:08.480 --> 00:28:10.799
<v Speaker 1>a good joke. It would be fair to say that

438
00:28:10.880 --> 00:28:13.680
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent of your audience is happy that you did

439
00:28:13.720 --> 00:28:17.799
<v Speaker 1>not become I can't read the rest of that. Sorry,

440
00:28:17.599 --> 00:28:19.839
<v Speaker 1>he remember if you if you send me a super

441
00:28:19.880 --> 00:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>chat on stream labs, I can only see one long sentence.

442
00:28:22.759 --> 00:28:25.759
<v Speaker 1>I can't see a gigantic paragraph. But even though I

443
00:28:25.759 --> 00:28:28.640
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the seven dollars, a Ulson, that joke was kind

444
00:28:28.640 --> 00:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of lame. Bag. I tell for ten dollars, says, what

445
00:28:32.480 --> 00:28:35.039
<v Speaker 1>do you think about the Finnish Orthodox Church. I don't

446
00:28:35.039 --> 00:28:37.279
<v Speaker 1>have any knowledge of the Finnish Orthodox Church, Father deacon,

447
00:28:37.319 --> 00:28:38.319
<v Speaker 1>do you hadn't know anything about this.

448
00:28:41.839 --> 00:28:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I think they're pretty good. I think they're technically under

449
00:28:44.839 --> 00:28:48.440
<v Speaker 2>the EP. But as far as I've heard of it,

450
00:28:48.519 --> 00:28:50.079
<v Speaker 2>I haven't heard any problems.

451
00:28:49.720 --> 00:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>With he says, with my finished roots, I would feel

452
00:28:53.680 --> 00:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>like it's more natural to join that, But people from

453
00:28:56.640 --> 00:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the Russian Church tend to speak against it. I don't know.

454
00:29:00.559 --> 00:29:02.079
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the drama.

455
00:29:02.279 --> 00:29:06.680
<v Speaker 5>That's because there's a you gotta know the history between

456
00:29:07.200 --> 00:29:10.279
<v Speaker 5>Finland and Russia, right.

457
00:29:10.319 --> 00:29:13.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what is what is the isue, so.

458
00:29:15.119 --> 00:29:17.960
<v Speaker 5>You know, acquiring lands and wars and stuff like that.

459
00:29:18.119 --> 00:29:24.079
<v Speaker 5>So there there's some sensitivity with that. That's not a

460
00:29:24.079 --> 00:29:30.480
<v Speaker 5>theological issue. That's a cultural, a cultural issue. I don't

461
00:29:31.000 --> 00:29:36.160
<v Speaker 5>personally I imagine this person's asking in Finland because I'm

462
00:29:36.160 --> 00:29:38.920
<v Speaker 5>trying to think, like what other Finnish.

463
00:29:38.720 --> 00:29:41.279
<v Speaker 2>Orthodox churches there are outside of Finland.

464
00:29:41.319 --> 00:29:43.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean it sounds like that's what he means.

465
00:29:43.920 --> 00:29:47.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, I was just gonna say, I'm ethnically finish,

466
00:29:47.599 --> 00:29:52.039
<v Speaker 4>and our greatest hero is our greatest hero because he

467
00:29:52.160 --> 00:29:54.839
<v Speaker 4>killed like a lot of Russians.

468
00:29:54.960 --> 00:29:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Like a lot.

469
00:29:59.079 --> 00:30:02.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah you know, do you know what I'm talking about? Yeah, so,

470
00:30:02.279 --> 00:30:03.799
<v Speaker 2>like a lot of Russia.

471
00:30:03.839 --> 00:30:05.799
<v Speaker 4>Like he killed a lot of Russian so and that

472
00:30:05.839 --> 00:30:07.079
<v Speaker 4>guy's out national hero.

473
00:30:07.359 --> 00:30:12.039
<v Speaker 2>So like Russian Finland relations are still sketchy to this day.

474
00:30:12.359 --> 00:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>So basically, you're defending du that is what you're saying.

475
00:30:14.680 --> 00:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>You're here to defend.

476
00:30:16.960 --> 00:30:20.799
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I am a douan Is, but I get we must.

477
00:30:21.079 --> 00:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>We must train the American the right wing to take

478
00:30:23.799 --> 00:30:25.079
<v Speaker 1>down America.

479
00:30:25.960 --> 00:30:27.200
<v Speaker 2>The Dougan Bitcoin.

480
00:30:27.400 --> 00:30:30.119
<v Speaker 4>I get that, and I share before Jed Dire and

481
00:30:30.200 --> 00:30:31.119
<v Speaker 4>kJ be on Twitter.

482
00:30:33.119 --> 00:30:33.359
<v Speaker 11>Uh.

483
00:30:33.400 --> 00:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, is there anybody in the discord that wants to

484
00:30:40.680 --> 00:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>speak up?

485
00:30:42.440 --> 00:30:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I had another question?

486
00:30:43.480 --> 00:30:43.599
<v Speaker 3>Is that?

487
00:30:43.720 --> 00:30:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

488
00:30:44.200 --> 00:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Sure?

489
00:30:46.240 --> 00:30:47.400
<v Speaker 2>A bit of a lament question.

490
00:30:48.160 --> 00:30:51.079
<v Speaker 9>During this gism when the church is separated, I wanted

491
00:30:51.119 --> 00:30:54.119
<v Speaker 9>to know how it worked when it came to going

492
00:30:54.119 --> 00:30:57.200
<v Speaker 9>to battle together against you know, Islam and the Crusades.

493
00:30:57.240 --> 00:30:59.119
<v Speaker 2>How did all that come together? Did they you know,

494
00:30:59.200 --> 00:31:00.599
<v Speaker 2>get together and it was.

495
00:31:00.559 --> 00:31:02.759
<v Speaker 9>Okay for that time when they just separated, you know,

496
00:31:02.920 --> 00:31:04.519
<v Speaker 9>just a little bit of clarity on that situation.

497
00:31:05.279 --> 00:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean the Byzantium was sacked. What do you mean?

498
00:31:13.119 --> 00:31:15.640
<v Speaker 2>I was wondering because the schism was in ten fifty.

499
00:31:15.359 --> 00:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Four correct officially, Yeah.

500
00:31:21.759 --> 00:31:24.519
<v Speaker 2>And the Crusade were a little bit after that, correct.

501
00:31:25.039 --> 00:31:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there were there were at camps.

502
00:31:27.880 --> 00:31:30.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, there were several attempts to kind of unite, and

503
00:31:32.240 --> 00:31:36.799
<v Speaker 5>that offered, uh, what we thought would be kind of

504
00:31:36.799 --> 00:31:43.599
<v Speaker 5>a promising lead to possibly be united in something, and

505
00:31:43.640 --> 00:31:48.160
<v Speaker 5>it kind of backfired. As Jade pointed out, Byzantium was

506
00:31:48.240 --> 00:31:52.119
<v Speaker 5>under attack, and uh, we thought that we could unite

507
00:31:52.599 --> 00:31:56.119
<v Speaker 5>and call for the help of the Latins and it

508
00:31:56.160 --> 00:31:57.000
<v Speaker 5>really didn't.

509
00:31:56.759 --> 00:31:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Work out well.

510
00:31:58.160 --> 00:32:01.839
<v Speaker 1>No, the Latins eventually sack the Latin Bysanthium eventually.

511
00:32:04.319 --> 00:32:06.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, man, you guys, I appreciates the answer.

512
00:32:06.440 --> 00:32:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Man, Yeah, I'm wrong, dude, Hey Jay, yes, sir.

513
00:32:14.079 --> 00:32:16.720
<v Speaker 12>I only have a minute, but I did wanna I

514
00:32:16.759 --> 00:32:19.680
<v Speaker 12>guess ask you already know me as far as we

515
00:32:19.839 --> 00:32:22.279
<v Speaker 12>talked for a really long time yesterday or the day before.

516
00:32:24.839 --> 00:32:27.160
<v Speaker 12>If you remember, you probably talked to a million people.

517
00:32:27.480 --> 00:32:31.759
<v Speaker 12>But anyway, I guess my question is okay, good.

518
00:32:36.200 --> 00:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Your question as well.

519
00:32:39.359 --> 00:32:40.359
<v Speaker 2>Craized Latin.

520
00:32:41.319 --> 00:32:47.599
<v Speaker 12>I guess the clitice learned about extraordinary form, visit team,

521
00:32:47.799 --> 00:32:49.640
<v Speaker 12>all that kind of stuff, as well as the Orthodox

522
00:32:50.160 --> 00:33:00.400
<v Speaker 12>UH spent about tens visiting Eastern parish Orthodox parishes to

523
00:33:00.480 --> 00:33:01.000
<v Speaker 12>the priests.

524
00:33:01.640 --> 00:33:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I remember the story. You don't have to. I'm

525
00:33:03.839 --> 00:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>not trying to be mean, but I remember. You're cutting out.

526
00:33:09.960 --> 00:33:10.079
<v Speaker 2>Bro.

527
00:33:13.160 --> 00:33:15.839
<v Speaker 1>If you want to leave the discord and then pop

528
00:33:15.960 --> 00:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>back in, it usually resets the setting. So maybe you

529
00:33:19.200 --> 00:33:21.319
<v Speaker 1>won't be cutting out, but you're cutting out right now.

530
00:33:23.799 --> 00:33:28.119
<v Speaker 12>Kristen diving into the possibility that she might be in

531
00:33:28.160 --> 00:33:28.480
<v Speaker 12>the wrong.

532
00:33:28.880 --> 00:33:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Bro.

533
00:33:29.960 --> 00:33:32.119
<v Speaker 1>But it Hey, I didn't hear any of that. You

534
00:33:32.240 --> 00:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>cut out for all that, damn, so so exit and

535
00:33:36.640 --> 00:33:37.039
<v Speaker 1>come back.

536
00:33:38.319 --> 00:33:42.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, all right? But oh the joys discord.

537
00:33:44.039 --> 00:33:46.640
<v Speaker 4>If people want to ask a question and you don't

538
00:33:46.640 --> 00:33:48.839
<v Speaker 4>want to hope on stream, just go. If you're in

539
00:33:48.880 --> 00:33:52.200
<v Speaker 4>the discord, go to voice text General. I tagged everyone there.

540
00:33:52.480 --> 00:33:54.559
<v Speaker 4>You can ask questions and I'll see them.

541
00:33:54.599 --> 00:33:54.960
<v Speaker 2>To Jay.

542
00:33:56.160 --> 00:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>This is the first ghetto pale attempt at a call

543
00:33:59.839 --> 00:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>in show. I don't even like the idea of Collin shows,

544
00:34:02.200 --> 00:34:06.119
<v Speaker 1>but we were trying to get okay, well, well we

545
00:34:06.200 --> 00:34:07.519
<v Speaker 1>were trying to get it. We were trying to get

546
00:34:07.640 --> 00:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Is to come debate, and he wouldn't do it.

547
00:34:10.239 --> 00:34:15.000
<v Speaker 2>But we got a question, what's.

548
00:34:14.840 --> 00:34:19.079
<v Speaker 4>The explanation of Noah's sons and grandsons having different features

549
00:34:19.199 --> 00:34:20.159
<v Speaker 4>and skin color?

550
00:34:24.639 --> 00:34:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Why does it need an explanation? What I mean, people

551
00:34:28.559 --> 00:34:33.639
<v Speaker 1>go into different climates and there's a symbiotic relationship between

552
00:34:33.960 --> 00:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, people's physiognomy and their environments. I mean, there's

553
00:34:38.000 --> 00:34:41.639
<v Speaker 1>nothing wrong with adaptation. And you know, yeah, people go

554
00:34:41.760 --> 00:34:45.480
<v Speaker 1>into southerly climates, they're gonna you know, gradually developed, you know,

555
00:34:46.000 --> 00:34:50.119
<v Speaker 1>darker scin or whatever. I don't see why that's even controversial.

556
00:34:51.880 --> 00:34:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we got another one.

557
00:34:53.440 --> 00:34:55.320
<v Speaker 4>What would you say to people who tell you the

558
00:34:55.400 --> 00:34:59.760
<v Speaker 4>Bible is impossible because of dinosaurs skeletons existing.

559
00:35:01.400 --> 00:35:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's two possible answers. I think that anything that

560
00:35:04.519 --> 00:35:09.880
<v Speaker 1>modern science proposes that is bound up with Darwinian naturalism

561
00:35:10.000 --> 00:35:13.679
<v Speaker 1>can be legitimately doubted, and we have a basis to

562
00:35:13.719 --> 00:35:16.920
<v Speaker 1>be skeptical of. So there's a lot of questions about quote,

563
00:35:17.000 --> 00:35:20.519
<v Speaker 1>dinosaur skeletons to begin with. But even if they are real,

564
00:35:21.440 --> 00:35:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the Book of Job speaks of all kinds of things

565
00:35:23.840 --> 00:35:26.599
<v Speaker 1>that could absolutely be a dinosaurs. So there's nothing inherently

566
00:35:26.800 --> 00:35:32.119
<v Speaker 1>contradicting about either position is conceivably defensible.

567
00:35:33.320 --> 00:35:36.199
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Behemos is a good example of what could possibly

568
00:35:36.280 --> 00:35:37.039
<v Speaker 4>be a dinosaur.

569
00:35:37.719 --> 00:35:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Saying, okay, another one, do you think.

570
00:35:41.199 --> 00:35:44.000
<v Speaker 4>That the Orthodox and Catholic Church could unite in some

571
00:35:44.199 --> 00:35:47.440
<v Speaker 4>way in the future. Personally, I couldn't see it. I'm

572
00:35:47.480 --> 00:35:49.559
<v Speaker 4>not sure what your take is, Jay, So I just

573
00:35:49.639 --> 00:35:51.280
<v Speaker 4>wanted to ask and know your side.

574
00:35:51.800 --> 00:35:54.840
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean, there's our like if you look at

575
00:35:54.920 --> 00:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Metropolitan surfim Prius, he wrote a long letter to Francis.

576
00:35:58.440 --> 00:36:02.320
<v Speaker 1>He's a famous Greek Conservative bishop. He wrote a long

577
00:36:02.440 --> 00:36:06.800
<v Speaker 1>letter saying the thirty four or five elements that the

578
00:36:06.880 --> 00:36:09.519
<v Speaker 1>two churches could not unite over. That would have to change.

579
00:36:09.760 --> 00:36:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's the classical Orthodox position. It doesn't matter what

580
00:36:13.920 --> 00:36:16.639
<v Speaker 1>modern and humanists say. You have to adhere to the

581
00:36:16.760 --> 00:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>traditional arguments that we've always made on the basis of

582
00:36:20.039 --> 00:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the canons and the councils as to what the elements

583
00:36:23.039 --> 00:36:26.199
<v Speaker 1>of change and innovation in Rome are. Right in the

584
00:36:26.239 --> 00:36:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Middle Ages, in the East. They were called Byzantine lists,

585
00:36:29.280 --> 00:36:31.119
<v Speaker 1>and these are the lists of the problems that we

586
00:36:31.199 --> 00:36:35.800
<v Speaker 1>have with Rome, things like forbidding pedro communion, forbidding married priests.

587
00:36:36.199 --> 00:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Those are just one of the many, right, there's a

588
00:36:38.039 --> 00:36:41.280
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of other ones, like philioque and that kind

589
00:36:41.280 --> 00:36:44.559
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. Obviously comes first. Papacy. Those are the main issues,

590
00:36:44.599 --> 00:36:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but there's a bunch of other issues too.

591
00:36:47.880 --> 00:36:50.639
<v Speaker 4>Okay, now the question these questions are rolling in, so

592
00:36:50.840 --> 00:36:54.400
<v Speaker 4>thanks to everyone in the discord, can you discuss the

593
00:36:54.519 --> 00:36:59.639
<v Speaker 4>difference in Protestant Christus Victor versus Orthodox attirement?

594
00:37:02.679 --> 00:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, Christus Victor is an attempt to borrow elements of

595
00:37:07.079 --> 00:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Patristic ideas. So there's nothing inherently anti Orthodox about some

596
00:37:12.360 --> 00:37:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of the ideas of Christa's Victor. Because the Lutheran theologian

597
00:37:16.840 --> 00:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that I think it was a Lutheran guy who went

598
00:37:18.519 --> 00:37:21.800
<v Speaker 1>back and tried to reconstruct different theories of atonement from

599
00:37:21.840 --> 00:37:25.039
<v Speaker 1>the Patristic period. He's just borrowing from different church fathers

600
00:37:25.079 --> 00:37:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and different ideas. So I would actually argue that the

601
00:37:29.119 --> 00:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Orthodox position has the correct elements of all the positions, right,

602
00:37:33.159 --> 00:37:35.440
<v Speaker 1>So all of the positions have elements. Is there a

603
00:37:35.519 --> 00:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>penal substitutionary aspect to it. Yes, Is there a Christ's

604
00:37:39.519 --> 00:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>victor aspect to it?

605
00:37:40.559 --> 00:37:40.760
<v Speaker 13>Yes?

606
00:37:41.559 --> 00:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Just read book three of John Damascus and he explains

607
00:37:44.320 --> 00:37:47.280
<v Speaker 1>perfectly in line with all of the Eastern fathers before

608
00:37:47.360 --> 00:37:49.519
<v Speaker 1>him and many of the early Latin fathers as to

609
00:37:49.639 --> 00:37:51.800
<v Speaker 1>what the orthodox doctrine of the death of Christ and

610
00:37:51.840 --> 00:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the Atonement is. The last part of book three is

611
00:37:54.800 --> 00:38:01.239
<v Speaker 1>the perfect excellent harmony with Christology doctrine. And the Protestants,

612
00:38:01.400 --> 00:38:05.079
<v Speaker 1>especially Calvinists, end up as historians with their doctrine. It's

613
00:38:05.119 --> 00:38:09.239
<v Speaker 1>that easy, so we don't have to go into Lutheran speculations.

614
00:38:09.320 --> 00:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>And as if we don't know what the doctrine of

615
00:38:12.440 --> 00:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the atonement and the death of Christ and the descent

616
00:38:14.559 --> 00:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>into Hades is, we do know. Like it's all just

617
00:38:18.559 --> 00:38:21.119
<v Speaker 1>academic theories up in the air, not for us. No,

618
00:38:21.920 --> 00:38:25.559
<v Speaker 1>the herowing of Hades is a dogma, it's nowhere in Protestantism.

619
00:38:29.079 --> 00:38:32.880
<v Speaker 2>We have another one, curious on your views on the

620
00:38:33.039 --> 00:38:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Church of the East.

621
00:38:35.039 --> 00:38:39.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we don't accept that as anymore than any of

622
00:38:39.239 --> 00:38:42.079
<v Speaker 1>the other Churches of the East, the so called Orientals.

623
00:38:42.119 --> 00:38:44.519
<v Speaker 1>They're just as much in schism as the others.

624
00:38:47.079 --> 00:38:51.239
<v Speaker 4>Okay, short answer love that in what sense would an

625
00:38:51.400 --> 00:38:55.000
<v Speaker 4>Orthodox say that Pope Leo was the archbishop of.

626
00:38:55.119 --> 00:38:58.119
<v Speaker 1>All the churches in the same way that that same

627
00:38:58.159 --> 00:39:01.320
<v Speaker 1>phraseology is used of Con Sentinople. I mean, these kinds

628
00:39:01.360 --> 00:39:04.639
<v Speaker 1>of glowing terms and phrases are used often. Uh. The

629
00:39:04.719 --> 00:39:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Alexandrian patriarch it is sometimes referred to as the head

630
00:39:07.719 --> 00:39:10.599
<v Speaker 1>of churches, the head of all churches Antioch and Basil's

631
00:39:10.679 --> 00:39:14.280
<v Speaker 1>letters as he uses that same phraseology. It's that there's

632
00:39:14.400 --> 00:39:18.559
<v Speaker 1>a common usage of florid. Uh, what's the term that

633
00:39:20.000 --> 00:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a term for like the glowing phrase

634
00:39:22.599 --> 00:39:26.559
<v Speaker 1>phraseology that's used at times. It doesn't always necessarily mean

635
00:39:27.000 --> 00:39:31.559
<v Speaker 1>the Vatican One doctrine of papal infallibility. So if you look,

636
00:39:31.639 --> 00:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the way Canon, look at the

637
00:39:33.519 --> 00:39:37.960
<v Speaker 1>what can you mute if you look at the way

638
00:39:38.000 --> 00:39:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Canon twenty eight of Chalcedon speaks of the ecumenical patriarch.

639
00:39:41.800 --> 00:39:48.519
<v Speaker 1>It it's ecumenical patriarchate, universal patriarch. It's just a term.

640
00:39:48.840 --> 00:39:54.079
<v Speaker 1>There's we don't necessarily read into that universal dogmas or

641
00:39:54.199 --> 00:39:56.559
<v Speaker 1>in terms of Vatican One view is all we have

642
00:39:56.679 --> 00:39:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to do there. Ifew the Vatican One view is just

643
00:39:58.960 --> 00:40:02.320
<v Speaker 1>show that it's not present in the Seven Councils. And

644
00:40:02.440 --> 00:40:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that's very easy to do. If that's the case, the

645
00:40:04.880 --> 00:40:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Vatican One refutes itself because Vatican One says that its

646
00:40:08.719 --> 00:40:09.760
<v Speaker 1>view was always true.

647
00:40:12.360 --> 00:40:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we got another one. How do we get people

648
00:40:15.559 --> 00:40:17.960
<v Speaker 2>over the quote sky daddy.

649
00:40:17.880 --> 00:40:22.440
<v Speaker 4>Argument and the quote if God good, why bad things happened?

650
00:40:22.719 --> 00:40:24.639
<v Speaker 2>Mind? How do we get people over that?

651
00:40:24.880 --> 00:40:26.840
<v Speaker 1>The easiest way to go about that is just to

652
00:40:27.039 --> 00:40:31.119
<v Speaker 1>point out that to do basic pres up first of all,

653
00:40:31.599 --> 00:40:34.480
<v Speaker 1>like we're not calling God a sky daddy, as if

654
00:40:35.199 --> 00:40:38.079
<v Speaker 1>there's a one to one correspondence between the earthly notion

655
00:40:38.239 --> 00:40:42.280
<v Speaker 1>of father and a heavenly literal father. Those are what's

656
00:40:42.280 --> 00:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>called analogia, right, There are analogies between human fathers and God.

657
00:40:45.519 --> 00:40:48.119
<v Speaker 1>The Father doesn't mean that God is identically literally a

658
00:40:48.239 --> 00:40:50.559
<v Speaker 1>quote guy with a long beard and a dad. He's

659
00:40:50.559 --> 00:40:53.679
<v Speaker 1>spoken of as like a father, but he's also spoken

660
00:40:53.719 --> 00:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of as like many other things. Mute. Can you mute?

661
00:41:00.920 --> 00:41:06.559
<v Speaker 1>Just boot that guy if he's so so? Uh so,

662
00:41:06.760 --> 00:41:10.079
<v Speaker 1>The sky daddy argument is based on a misunderstanding of

663
00:41:10.199 --> 00:41:13.280
<v Speaker 1>what divine names are divine terms. So if you read

664
00:41:13.320 --> 00:41:17.039
<v Speaker 1>Dionysius in the Divine Names he will go into detail

665
00:41:17.159 --> 00:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>explaining how we predicated God in what sense we use

666
00:41:20.000 --> 00:41:26.159
<v Speaker 1>these words in terms, and then ironically, you know, just

667
00:41:26.599 --> 00:41:27.199
<v Speaker 1>boot that guy.

668
00:41:27.760 --> 00:41:27.880
<v Speaker 14>Uh.

669
00:41:28.840 --> 00:41:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Ironically, atheists even do the same thing. They will speak

670
00:41:32.559 --> 00:41:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of nature like it's a mother, like it's an artificer,

671
00:41:35.880 --> 00:41:39.360
<v Speaker 1>like it's a designer, like it's a personal cognizant agent

672
00:41:39.559 --> 00:41:42.559
<v Speaker 1>able to create and make things, when it's an impersonal

673
00:41:42.880 --> 00:41:45.440
<v Speaker 1>chaotic force. So they will do that. They will do

674
00:41:45.559 --> 00:41:53.039
<v Speaker 1>the exact all right, booting that guy, just doing that, understand.

675
00:41:54.400 --> 00:41:55.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I can see.

676
00:41:55.599 --> 00:42:00.239
<v Speaker 5>I'll keep my eyes by the way, even better, look

677
00:42:00.280 --> 00:42:02.079
<v Speaker 5>at the personification of science.

678
00:42:02.719 --> 00:42:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Yes, we got almost three hundred people, by the way,

679
00:42:06.199 --> 00:42:08.719
<v Speaker 1>welcome everybody, Thank your father digging. Go ahead and finish that.

680
00:42:08.719 --> 00:42:11.719
<v Speaker 1>I thought, if you want to, well, I mean.

681
00:42:12.280 --> 00:42:16.280
<v Speaker 5>If you notice, let's consult the oracle science. Science says,

682
00:42:16.440 --> 00:42:17.159
<v Speaker 5>it tells.

683
00:42:17.000 --> 00:42:19.039
<v Speaker 1>Us, oh, yes, exactly right.

684
00:42:19.599 --> 00:42:23.719
<v Speaker 5>It's perfied form of deity that you go to the

685
00:42:23.760 --> 00:42:26.559
<v Speaker 5>oracle and givinize.

686
00:42:26.079 --> 00:42:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Your Yes, the science gods have spoken that COVID you know,

687
00:42:31.559 --> 00:42:37.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't affect riots, right, but it does affect anything else exactly. So,

688
00:42:38.039 --> 00:42:40.360
<v Speaker 1>so sky daddy God, I would just do a basic

689
00:42:40.480 --> 00:42:42.679
<v Speaker 1>prese up and say that this, First of all, it's

690
00:42:42.719 --> 00:42:45.400
<v Speaker 1>not accurate. You guys did the exact same thing with

691
00:42:45.440 --> 00:42:47.800
<v Speaker 1>personification of nature, and then you turn around and act

692
00:42:47.960 --> 00:42:51.960
<v Speaker 1>like nature has no qualities like this, there's no actual

693
00:42:52.079 --> 00:42:54.800
<v Speaker 1>design actually in nature, as they all argue, But then

694
00:42:54.800 --> 00:42:56.519
<v Speaker 1>they turn around and talk like there is te loos

695
00:42:56.559 --> 00:42:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in nature. Then I would turn around and say that

696
00:43:00.679 --> 00:43:02.960
<v Speaker 1>what was the next one? Oh, morals, And I would

697
00:43:02.960 --> 00:43:06.159
<v Speaker 1>just simply say that you need something like Christianity to

698
00:43:06.199 --> 00:43:10.159
<v Speaker 1>provide a system for a basis for objective ethics. I'm

699
00:43:10.199 --> 00:43:12.800
<v Speaker 1>not saying that there's objective ethics just because I say

700
00:43:12.920 --> 00:43:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Christianity is true. I'm saying that the system of Christian

701
00:43:15.599 --> 00:43:19.519
<v Speaker 1>theology or metaphysics and ethics gives an account for how

702
00:43:19.639 --> 00:43:24.199
<v Speaker 1>there's ethics. That's different than just saying well, it's true

703
00:43:24.199 --> 00:43:26.559
<v Speaker 1>because we have ethics. And that's two different arguments, right.

704
00:43:26.960 --> 00:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>The atheist doesn't have a basis at all to say

705
00:43:30.000 --> 00:43:35.199
<v Speaker 1>something is wrong, something is ethically morally wrong, it's arbitrary.

706
00:43:35.920 --> 00:43:38.239
<v Speaker 1>That's two different arguments. So if you can make those

707
00:43:38.400 --> 00:43:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that argument and just say oh no, wait a minute,

708
00:43:40.480 --> 00:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>so Christianity is quote evil or bad, but you don't

709
00:43:44.000 --> 00:43:46.679
<v Speaker 1>actually believe there is any objective evil or bad, so

710
00:43:46.760 --> 00:43:50.559
<v Speaker 1>you have no basis to make an argument that Christianity

711
00:43:51.199 --> 00:43:51.880
<v Speaker 1>is bad.

712
00:43:57.159 --> 00:44:03.719
<v Speaker 4>Okay, next question is, yes, what advice would you give

713
00:44:03.760 --> 00:44:07.440
<v Speaker 4>to an atheist who simply confine it within himself to believe?

714
00:44:12.280 --> 00:44:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, belief is not a like thing that you

715
00:44:17.280 --> 00:44:20.480
<v Speaker 1>work yourself up to. I mean you have to repent,

716
00:44:20.639 --> 00:44:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to change your life to believe. There's a

717
00:44:23.840 --> 00:44:28.920
<v Speaker 1>symbiotic relationship between the repenting and changing our ways and

718
00:44:29.360 --> 00:44:32.639
<v Speaker 1>the acquisition of the gift of faith. Right. I mean

719
00:44:32.679 --> 00:44:34.840
<v Speaker 1>it's all grace ultimately, in the sense that God is

720
00:44:34.920 --> 00:44:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the one that's giving us our providential situations that lead

721
00:44:38.079 --> 00:44:40.280
<v Speaker 1>us to believe and repent. And at the same time,

722
00:44:40.400 --> 00:44:42.559
<v Speaker 1>grace is all I mean, faith is also a gift,

723
00:44:43.000 --> 00:44:45.360
<v Speaker 1>So I would ask God for faith and at the

724
00:44:45.400 --> 00:44:49.599
<v Speaker 1>same time, you know, stop whatever degenerates that you're into.

725
00:44:50.320 --> 00:44:51.440
<v Speaker 1>That's that's how it works.

726
00:44:54.079 --> 00:44:57.079
<v Speaker 4>Also, I'm going to send you a someone ask that

727
00:44:57.760 --> 00:45:00.960
<v Speaker 4>you put up a screenshot of each as his tweets,

728
00:45:01.119 --> 00:45:03.559
<v Speaker 4>So I'll send you a screenshot.

729
00:45:03.719 --> 00:45:06.320
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm not doing that. I'm not doing that. I'm

730
00:45:06.320 --> 00:45:09.280
<v Speaker 1>not We're not doing stupid drama. I mean it's an

731
00:45:09.360 --> 00:45:12.320
<v Speaker 1>open invitation. I've invited this guy for eight months to

732
00:45:12.400 --> 00:45:14.480
<v Speaker 1>do a debate and he just talks around it all

733
00:45:14.559 --> 00:45:16.800
<v Speaker 1>do it in six months? Oh were you you made

734
00:45:16.840 --> 00:45:18.800
<v Speaker 1>fun of me? I didn't make fun of you. This

735
00:45:19.000 --> 00:45:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is all he does. He just asks, you know, it's

736
00:45:21.079 --> 00:45:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just drama. I'm not doing that. I mean, we

737
00:45:23.480 --> 00:45:26.960
<v Speaker 1>set up we set up a debate with we set

738
00:45:27.039 --> 00:45:31.159
<v Speaker 1>up a debate with his teacher. If we set up

739
00:45:31.159 --> 00:45:33.039
<v Speaker 1>a debate with his teacher, we set up a debate

740
00:45:33.119 --> 00:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>with everybody else. Have no problems with Zephon Molini, Matt Dela, Hunting,

741
00:45:36.800 --> 00:45:40.519
<v Speaker 1>Adam Okesh, all these different well known people and that.

742
00:45:40.719 --> 00:45:42.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's been months and months and months of

743
00:45:42.599 --> 00:45:44.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to set up a debate with this guy. It's

744
00:45:44.039 --> 00:45:46.159
<v Speaker 1>just a waste of time. I'm not gonna even interact

745
00:45:46.199 --> 00:45:46.480
<v Speaker 1>with him.

746
00:45:48.159 --> 00:45:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

747
00:45:48.559 --> 00:45:52.159
<v Speaker 4>Another question, is there an attempt to unify the Church

748
00:45:52.239 --> 00:45:55.960
<v Speaker 4>of the East and Orthodox Church actively going on?

749
00:45:56.280 --> 00:45:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't keep up with that.

750
00:45:58.079 --> 00:45:58.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

751
00:45:59.679 --> 00:46:02.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know there's been discussions with Monophesites. I

752
00:46:02.239 --> 00:46:03.199
<v Speaker 1>don't know about Syrians.

753
00:46:03.360 --> 00:46:03.679
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

754
00:46:04.760 --> 00:46:09.079
<v Speaker 4>Okay, can you explain what is meant by formal distinctions

755
00:46:09.159 --> 00:46:11.599
<v Speaker 4>in God and why Orthodox reject this.

756
00:46:12.679 --> 00:46:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't matter what terms you use, because we're not Scotis.

757
00:46:17.199 --> 00:46:19.880
<v Speaker 1>If you read Scotus's treatises, he has two treatises on

758
00:46:19.920 --> 00:46:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the unicity of God and the Existence of God. I've

759
00:46:24.320 --> 00:46:26.119
<v Speaker 1>got the treatises right over here on my shelf, and go.

760
00:46:26.400 --> 00:46:28.000
<v Speaker 1>We did a whole talk on this. Go watch the

761
00:46:28.079 --> 00:46:30.840
<v Speaker 1>talk that we did, me and father Deacon Ananias, where

762
00:46:30.880 --> 00:46:35.400
<v Speaker 1>we covered Anselm's ontological argument and Scotus's arguments for divine simplicity,

763
00:46:35.400 --> 00:46:41.400
<v Speaker 1>where he equates in a strict identity, will, knowledge, essence, unity,

764
00:46:41.719 --> 00:46:44.719
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, all of the attributes of God and he

765
00:46:44.880 --> 00:46:49.599
<v Speaker 1>predicates it all on the basis of natural theology. Okay,

766
00:46:50.239 --> 00:46:53.599
<v Speaker 1>that's that's not our position. We can't unite with Scotism.

767
00:46:53.760 --> 00:46:58.719
<v Speaker 1>So formal distinction of Scotis is just a scholastics, quasi

768
00:46:58.800 --> 00:47:01.719
<v Speaker 1>scholastic thing that's invented to try to have a closer

769
00:47:01.800 --> 00:47:04.800
<v Speaker 1>position because he's trying to do justice to the Eastern position.

770
00:47:05.280 --> 00:47:08.400
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter. We already know what the correct distinction is.

771
00:47:08.840 --> 00:47:11.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not based on speculations of later theologians in the

772
00:47:12.000 --> 00:47:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Middle Ages, because the dogmatic councils have already determined what

773
00:47:17.480 --> 00:47:20.679
<v Speaker 1>the distinction is. It's a real distinction between essence and energy,

774
00:47:21.400 --> 00:47:24.599
<v Speaker 1>just as real as a distinction between the hypostases. It's

775
00:47:24.679 --> 00:47:26.960
<v Speaker 1>not even debated in the in the in the in

776
00:47:27.039 --> 00:47:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Our Fathers, It's very clear. I mean, Maximus has tons

777
00:47:30.800 --> 00:47:36.719
<v Speaker 1>of passages that discuss this distinction. Right the sixth Council

778
00:47:36.840 --> 00:47:40.360
<v Speaker 1>predicates its argumentation on the essence energy distinction being real.

779
00:47:41.000 --> 00:47:43.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean imagine saying that creating the world is only

780
00:47:43.760 --> 00:47:46.400
<v Speaker 1>formally distinct from Jesus walking on water. I mean, just

781
00:47:46.480 --> 00:47:50.760
<v Speaker 1>think how stupid that is. So formal distinctions, A formal

782
00:47:50.800 --> 00:47:53.920
<v Speaker 1>distinction is just a scholastic thing to try to have

783
00:47:54.000 --> 00:47:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a position closer to the east. But it doesn't matter

784
00:47:56.920 --> 00:47:59.679
<v Speaker 1>because I can go to Scotus's other works where he

785
00:47:59.840 --> 00:48:02.679
<v Speaker 1>is explicitly says things that we could never agree with.

786
00:48:05.719 --> 00:48:08.360
<v Speaker 4>Okay, we've got a question that I think if Father

787
00:48:08.480 --> 00:48:10.880
<v Speaker 4>Daton is there, I think this would be a good

788
00:48:10.920 --> 00:48:13.800
<v Speaker 4>question for him. So I'm an inquire in a very

789
00:48:13.920 --> 00:48:18.159
<v Speaker 4>evangelical family. They really don't like orthodoxy, and I don't

790
00:48:18.199 --> 00:48:19.719
<v Speaker 4>want to be evangelical anymore.

791
00:48:20.000 --> 00:48:22.360
<v Speaker 2>What do I do? I can't drive yet, and I

792
00:48:22.480 --> 00:48:24.360
<v Speaker 2>don't know anyone orthodox around me.

793
00:48:27.320 --> 00:48:33.079
<v Speaker 5>I'd say, tickets slow, thank you for your question. I

794
00:48:33.199 --> 00:48:38.000
<v Speaker 5>get a lot of these questions and you know, consulted

795
00:48:38.079 --> 00:48:40.519
<v Speaker 5>with my spiritual father on how to approach.

796
00:48:41.280 --> 00:48:46.320
<v Speaker 2>These sorts of things. You know, as many of you converted, know.

797
00:48:46.519 --> 00:48:51.639
<v Speaker 5>That sometimes you spend a long time is a catechumen,

798
00:48:52.239 --> 00:48:58.159
<v Speaker 5>many years. It can be a slow process. So I'd

799
00:48:58.320 --> 00:49:06.199
<v Speaker 5>encourage you if you can't get to a service that

800
00:49:07.639 --> 00:49:11.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, we have a Catechises program on the discourse

801
00:49:12.000 --> 00:49:16.039
<v Speaker 5>here and in fact, I think we correct me if

802
00:49:16.079 --> 00:49:18.880
<v Speaker 5>I'm wrong, Jay and Lewis, but we have a Metropolitan

803
00:49:19.000 --> 00:49:24.639
<v Speaker 5>Jonah aiding in that process. I'd say, really start trying

804
00:49:24.800 --> 00:49:29.559
<v Speaker 5>to you know, get some good reads. We have a

805
00:49:29.719 --> 00:49:34.880
<v Speaker 5>good book recommendation. You can always right me questions and

806
00:49:34.960 --> 00:49:38.159
<v Speaker 5>if it's above my pay grade, any wisdom that I have,

807
00:49:38.320 --> 00:49:41.800
<v Speaker 5>again it comes from my spiritual father, and I'll off

808
00:49:41.840 --> 00:49:42.639
<v Speaker 5>to take questions.

809
00:49:43.079 --> 00:49:45.679
<v Speaker 2>So I think we can help you, and we can.

810
00:49:46.440 --> 00:49:48.800
<v Speaker 5>You know, you're not hopefully you're not going to be

811
00:49:48.880 --> 00:49:53.719
<v Speaker 5>living with your parents forever, and you know, pray, pray

812
00:49:53.800 --> 00:49:59.159
<v Speaker 5>that God, you know, provide the means to eventually attend

813
00:49:59.440 --> 00:50:00.880
<v Speaker 5>a SERVI us and.

814
00:50:02.840 --> 00:50:06.559
<v Speaker 2>I would definitely suggest don't argue Orthodoxy with your parents.

815
00:50:08.639 --> 00:50:13.280
<v Speaker 5>Just try to acquire the spirit of Orthodoxy, and they'll

816
00:50:13.360 --> 00:50:17.360
<v Speaker 5>notice a change and they'll begin to inquire, what is

817
00:50:17.480 --> 00:50:21.199
<v Speaker 5>this new thing that you've found. That's what i'd suggest,

818
00:50:21.360 --> 00:50:24.320
<v Speaker 5>So feel free to write any of us again, We've

819
00:50:24.360 --> 00:50:28.280
<v Speaker 5>got a lot of great resources and you can still

820
00:50:28.480 --> 00:50:30.320
<v Speaker 5>experience Orthodoxy and.

821
00:50:30.360 --> 00:50:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Learn a lot about it that way.

822
00:50:34.559 --> 00:50:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not upset. I get tired of the same questions

823
00:50:37.119 --> 00:50:38.880
<v Speaker 1>over and over and over. And when we do entire

824
00:50:39.000 --> 00:50:42.239
<v Speaker 1>streams answering those questions and then people ask those questions

825
00:50:42.360 --> 00:50:44.119
<v Speaker 1>over and over and over, that's I'm not upset. I'm

826
00:50:44.159 --> 00:50:46.159
<v Speaker 1>just saying that it's already been dealt with. We've done

827
00:50:46.159 --> 00:50:49.239
<v Speaker 1>this million times. And also because I know the people

828
00:50:49.320 --> 00:50:52.719
<v Speaker 1>that will rely on these kind of bogus, you know,

829
00:50:52.840 --> 00:50:55.280
<v Speaker 1>ways around arguments. But I'm going to read you from

830
00:50:55.360 --> 00:50:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the philosophical writings of John Damascus on page fifty six,

831
00:51:00.079 --> 00:51:03.920
<v Speaker 1>says that I establish this knowledge and will of the

832
00:51:04.039 --> 00:51:06.800
<v Speaker 1>First Being or God or God is the same as

833
00:51:06.920 --> 00:51:11.039
<v Speaker 1>his essence, The divine essence is absolutely identical to its will.

834
00:51:11.800 --> 00:51:14.760
<v Speaker 1>And he goes on to say, I have proved thus

835
00:51:15.039 --> 00:51:18.679
<v Speaker 1>that the knowledge the Self love and the essence are

836
00:51:18.719 --> 00:51:22.800
<v Speaker 1>all identical in the first being, there is no knowledge

837
00:51:23.000 --> 00:51:27.079
<v Speaker 1>or accidental He says, there's nothing accidental. No knowledge can

838
00:51:27.119 --> 00:51:32.320
<v Speaker 1>be accidental to the first essence. He goes on and

839
00:51:32.480 --> 00:51:40.880
<v Speaker 1>explicitly states, so there's nothing. But he says, act as purists. Okay, So, like,

840
00:51:41.000 --> 00:51:43.559
<v Speaker 1>how long do we have to keep making the same

841
00:51:43.639 --> 00:51:45.760
<v Speaker 1>responses in the same arguments? And he says it over

842
00:51:45.760 --> 00:51:48.559
<v Speaker 1>and over over. This is not, you know, like one

843
00:51:49.159 --> 00:51:50.840
<v Speaker 1>thing I'm taking out of ord. He says, the love

844
00:51:50.880 --> 00:51:53.159
<v Speaker 1>of God is identical the essence of God. Again, don't

845
00:51:53.159 --> 00:51:58.679
<v Speaker 1>you understand that that's not the triadic christological dogma of

846
00:51:58.760 --> 00:52:02.119
<v Speaker 1>the first seven centuries. We don't teach that, The councils

847
00:52:02.119 --> 00:52:04.760
<v Speaker 1>don't teach that. Johnamascus writes entire books against that.

848
00:52:11.000 --> 00:52:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Okay, we have someone in voice chat who wants to

849
00:52:14.079 --> 00:52:14.760
<v Speaker 4>ask a question.

850
00:52:15.079 --> 00:52:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome manifest.

851
00:52:18.480 --> 00:52:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, can everybody hear me?

852
00:52:19.960 --> 00:52:20.199
<v Speaker 3>Fine?

853
00:52:20.960 --> 00:52:22.159
<v Speaker 2>Can you all right?

854
00:52:22.719 --> 00:52:25.559
<v Speaker 11>So my question is kind of a compound question, but

855
00:52:25.679 --> 00:52:31.280
<v Speaker 11>it's adhering to one ultimate questions. That's okay, Okay, So

856
00:52:31.840 --> 00:52:35.280
<v Speaker 11>my question is are you familiar with the letters written

857
00:52:35.440 --> 00:52:39.000
<v Speaker 11>in the late nine hundreds and early one thousands, going

858
00:52:39.079 --> 00:52:42.119
<v Speaker 11>back and forth between Roman Constantinople that led to the

859
00:52:42.159 --> 00:52:46.360
<v Speaker 11>Great Schism, and would you, and if so, would you

860
00:52:46.440 --> 00:52:49.679
<v Speaker 11>please explain for us the contents and refutation to the

861
00:52:49.760 --> 00:52:53.440
<v Speaker 11>Roman Catholic argument at the Orthodox Church schisms and not

862
00:52:53.599 --> 00:52:54.360
<v Speaker 11>the other way around.

863
00:52:54.480 --> 00:52:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Read Francis de Vornik's entire book on it, and

864
00:52:57.159 --> 00:52:59.840
<v Speaker 1>he is one of your top Unity eight scholars who've

865
00:52:59.840 --> 00:53:01.719
<v Speaker 1>been indicates and admits our position. How's that?

866
00:53:04.239 --> 00:53:04.559
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

867
00:53:05.360 --> 00:53:06.679
<v Speaker 2>What was the name of that book again.

868
00:53:07.840 --> 00:53:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Father Francis de Vornik, The Phocian Schism. It's a famous,

869
00:53:12.400 --> 00:53:13.079
<v Speaker 1>well known book.

870
00:53:15.239 --> 00:53:17.840
<v Speaker 2>I think it referring to the you know, the business.

871
00:53:19.760 --> 00:53:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, okay, but I'm saying that the Vornick covers that

872
00:53:25.159 --> 00:53:26.880
<v Speaker 1>whole period of the Phocian Schism.

873
00:53:28.920 --> 00:53:34.039
<v Speaker 2>All right, thank you. I'll look into that. Okay, thank you.

874
00:53:34.119 --> 00:53:38.599
<v Speaker 4>Manifest Okay, next question, Jay, how do you see the

875
00:53:38.760 --> 00:53:43.239
<v Speaker 4>alien slash extraterrestrial syop evolve in the coming year.

876
00:53:46.320 --> 00:53:48.360
<v Speaker 1>That's not really what we're here to tell. I mean,

877
00:53:48.360 --> 00:53:51.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I specify it's okay, I mean I don't

878
00:53:51.679 --> 00:53:54.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, it's entirely possible that they

879
00:53:54.159 --> 00:53:56.400
<v Speaker 1>could throw that kind of a thing at us. After all,

880
00:53:56.440 --> 00:53:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the corunka nonsense. I don't. I don't personally think it'll

881
00:54:00.079 --> 00:54:02.840
<v Speaker 1>go that far, but it could. But I mean, we're

882
00:54:02.880 --> 00:54:06.760
<v Speaker 1>here right now to talk about I said, atheism, logic, metaphysics,

883
00:54:06.800 --> 00:54:11.360
<v Speaker 1>biblical theology, Early Church, Islam, Protestant Roman Catholics. So that's

884
00:54:11.360 --> 00:54:14.719
<v Speaker 1>what we're here to talk about today, not not UFOs.

885
00:54:21.440 --> 00:54:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess, I guess that fits under metaphysics. So I

886
00:54:24.480 --> 00:54:27.760
<v Speaker 1>guess do aliens exist as a metaphysical question? So I

887
00:54:27.800 --> 00:54:29.800
<v Speaker 1>guess I guess he is within the balance of what

888
00:54:29.920 --> 00:54:33.159
<v Speaker 1>we're here to talk about. But anybody else, if you

889
00:54:33.239 --> 00:54:36.639
<v Speaker 1>want to, feel free to offer up a super chat

890
00:54:36.840 --> 00:54:41.320
<v Speaker 1>question whatever. I put into the link in the chat here.

891
00:54:43.960 --> 00:54:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes the discord app crashes, so Discordous crash. Let me

892
00:54:46.880 --> 00:54:51.360
<v Speaker 1>pull it back up. So the app the app crash.

893
00:54:51.440 --> 00:54:55.119
<v Speaker 1>But if you're on the video, if you're watching on YouTube,

894
00:54:55.159 --> 00:54:57.199
<v Speaker 1>I put into the chat the link to Father Deacon

895
00:54:57.239 --> 00:55:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and Night's discussion of Dunscotis and and some we deal

896
00:55:00.480 --> 00:55:03.519
<v Speaker 1>with the theology of those two guys, and are they

897
00:55:03.559 --> 00:55:07.599
<v Speaker 1>compatible with the Orthodox theology? So contrary to the Ecumenists,

898
00:55:07.639 --> 00:55:11.039
<v Speaker 1>they're not. We already have the decisions of the Palomite

899
00:55:11.039 --> 00:55:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Synods which are binding for us, which make it very

900
00:55:13.400 --> 00:55:15.079
<v Speaker 1>clear that you can't. I mean, just read the Tomos

901
00:55:15.119 --> 00:55:18.559
<v Speaker 1>of John Becos. You can't accept Romatholicism if you're Orthodox.

902
00:55:20.119 --> 00:55:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why people don't know this. It's not

903
00:55:22.519 --> 00:55:27.239
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to see what the Tomos of John Becos says.

904
00:55:27.440 --> 00:55:33.559
<v Speaker 1>It explicitly denies union on the Filioquay issues. It's not

905
00:55:33.719 --> 00:55:36.199
<v Speaker 1>rocket science that we're doing here. What is the Orthodox

906
00:55:36.239 --> 00:55:40.679
<v Speaker 1>position on? I don't know what that is, Gertz says

907
00:55:40.960 --> 00:55:45.880
<v Speaker 1>on sestuy Quay v Act of sixteen sixty six. I

908
00:55:45.960 --> 00:55:49.760
<v Speaker 1>have no I have no idea what that is. Sorry,

909
00:55:49.800 --> 00:55:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I'm not trying to avoid it, but I

910
00:55:51.360 --> 00:55:52.079
<v Speaker 1>don't know what that is.

911
00:55:53.880 --> 00:55:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, back to the questions, sure.

912
00:55:58.840 --> 00:56:03.559
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So when I asked, would you end capturing Christianity debate?

913
00:56:03.639 --> 00:56:05.679
<v Speaker 2>I know this has come up before. I think Capturing

914
00:56:05.760 --> 00:56:07.679
<v Speaker 2>Christianity refused to debate, didn't he?

915
00:56:09.079 --> 00:56:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, we were supposed to. I was supposed to debate

916
00:56:11.280 --> 00:56:12.320
<v Speaker 1>inspiring philosophy.

917
00:56:12.760 --> 00:56:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

918
00:56:13.039 --> 00:56:15.320
<v Speaker 1>And then they said they said that I had to

919
00:56:15.440 --> 00:56:19.760
<v Speaker 1>agree to not make any quote insults, which we'd already

920
00:56:19.800 --> 00:56:21.400
<v Speaker 1>agreed to the debate. And then they added on these

921
00:56:21.480 --> 00:56:24.719
<v Speaker 1>new criterias that you can't say anything critical or insulting

922
00:56:24.760 --> 00:56:27.519
<v Speaker 1>of the other person. And I said, well, that's too vague. Uh,

923
00:56:27.800 --> 00:56:30.920
<v Speaker 1>And I said, I'm We've already agreed to a debate,

924
00:56:31.159 --> 00:56:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna You know, if I make a mistake

925
00:56:33.440 --> 00:56:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in the debate, you're supposed to call it out. You

926
00:56:35.000 --> 00:56:37.159
<v Speaker 1>don't change the criteria of what I can and can't

927
00:56:37.239 --> 00:56:40.280
<v Speaker 1>say before the debate happens that you've already agreed to.

928
00:56:40.760 --> 00:56:43.119
<v Speaker 1>So they changed the criteria of what couldn't couldn't be said.

929
00:56:43.599 --> 00:56:45.960
<v Speaker 1>And so I said, I'm still willing to debate, but

930
00:56:46.000 --> 00:56:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna tell me what I can and can't say.

931
00:56:48.280 --> 00:56:50.559
<v Speaker 1>So then I said, well, why don't capture Christianity. Why

932
00:56:50.559 --> 00:56:52.320
<v Speaker 1>don't you come debate me as well? And he wouldn't

933
00:56:52.360 --> 00:56:54.800
<v Speaker 1>do it. So neither of them wanted to debate. This

934
00:56:55.119 --> 00:56:57.559
<v Speaker 1>was before they were actually familiar with what I do

935
00:56:57.719 --> 00:57:00.519
<v Speaker 1>or what I talk about. And then when I went

936
00:57:00.599 --> 00:57:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and looked into what I argue in my background, then

937
00:57:03.840 --> 00:57:05.920
<v Speaker 1>he decided to come up with this new criterion how

938
00:57:05.960 --> 00:57:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to back out. So I think he backed out. If

939
00:57:09.840 --> 00:57:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Cameron would love to to, I would love to have

940
00:57:12.480 --> 00:57:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Cameron come on, because he believes, with absolutely no training

941
00:57:16.400 --> 00:57:20.199
<v Speaker 1>at all, that he can destroy and refute the transcendental argument.

942
00:57:20.639 --> 00:57:23.239
<v Speaker 1>I would love, I would I would die to uh

943
00:57:23.639 --> 00:57:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to debate capturing Christianity on the transcendental argument and whether

944
00:57:27.000 --> 00:57:31.760
<v Speaker 1>it's sound and valid. So please, Cameron, I pe either

945
00:57:31.800 --> 00:57:34.760
<v Speaker 1>one of you come debate. I promised I won't be

946
00:57:34.880 --> 00:57:36.719
<v Speaker 1>mean to you. I won't hurt your feelings. I promise,

947
00:57:37.800 --> 00:57:39.840
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think that they actually they don't really

948
00:57:39.880 --> 00:57:42.079
<v Speaker 1>want to debate. That's the root of this issue.

949
00:57:42.280 --> 00:57:45.280
<v Speaker 5>And Cameron, if you're listening, if you don't want Jay,

950
00:57:45.920 --> 00:57:48.159
<v Speaker 5>I'm always here and I'm a nice guy.

951
00:57:48.960 --> 00:57:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Father Deacon is much nicer than me, So he's uh,

952
00:57:52.800 --> 00:57:55.559
<v Speaker 1>he's a better he's a better philosopher, more, he's well,

953
00:57:55.719 --> 00:57:58.079
<v Speaker 1>he's more trained than I am. So feel free to

954
00:57:58.239 --> 00:58:05.079
<v Speaker 1>also have an interaction with Father Diacon. Doctor Annias, We've.

955
00:58:04.960 --> 00:58:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Got another question.

956
00:58:07.719 --> 00:58:11.159
<v Speaker 4>What are your thoughts on the visions of Bishop Hieronymous.

957
00:58:11.400 --> 00:58:15.679
<v Speaker 4>I've got angelos. He prophesied the mass future conversion of

958
00:58:15.760 --> 00:58:18.039
<v Speaker 4>Germany to Orthodoxy, as well as the destruction of the

959
00:58:18.119 --> 00:58:21.079
<v Speaker 4>papacy in World War three, as well as a final

960
00:58:21.119 --> 00:58:23.719
<v Speaker 4>ecumenical council to stamp out every heresy.

961
00:58:25.119 --> 00:58:27.159
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard this as new to me. I don't

962
00:58:27.159 --> 00:58:27.760
<v Speaker 1>know anything about it.

963
00:58:28.119 --> 00:58:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, heard that.

964
00:58:29.000 --> 00:58:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Sounds pretty cool, but I don't know what about it.

965
00:58:33.039 --> 00:58:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Would you be willing to debate ef Dawa, Dude, I've

966
00:58:36.920 --> 00:58:40.880
<v Speaker 1>already debated. We had an aazam before on they uploaded

967
00:58:40.880 --> 00:58:48.679
<v Speaker 1>this to the channel. I mean, here's a challenge. So

968
00:58:49.039 --> 00:58:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Christianity has been on the defensive debating their texts to

969
00:58:54.920 --> 00:59:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the Muslims for thirty years in you know, online audio

970
00:59:00.519 --> 00:59:03.679
<v Speaker 1>debates right all the way back to twenty thirty years ago.

971
00:59:03.800 --> 00:59:06.599
<v Speaker 1>Right when is a Muslim actually going to step up

972
00:59:06.639 --> 00:59:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and defend their theology? They never do it. They won't

973
00:59:09.880 --> 00:59:14.800
<v Speaker 1>debate their theology. They will only debate basing their arguments

974
00:59:14.920 --> 00:59:18.360
<v Speaker 1>on liberal higher criticism. That's all they ever want to debate.

975
00:59:19.280 --> 00:59:22.519
<v Speaker 1>And then because anytime it gets into their territory, it collapses.

976
00:59:23.199 --> 00:59:26.239
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not going to just debate you on the

977
00:59:26.280 --> 00:59:29.199
<v Speaker 1>Gospel of John. Just like sam Simun Shamun said, We're

978
00:59:29.199 --> 00:59:32.400
<v Speaker 1>going to debate Gospel John and the Koran and whether

979
00:59:32.480 --> 00:59:35.599
<v Speaker 1>it contradicts itself. Those are the we don't just do

980
00:59:36.119 --> 00:59:39.760
<v Speaker 1>only our texts, and you guys know that you won't

981
00:59:40.480 --> 00:59:44.440
<v Speaker 1>debate your text because it's difficult to defend because it's impossible,

982
00:59:45.519 --> 00:59:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and none of them. I'm starting to figure out that

983
00:59:47.519 --> 00:59:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the reason that the Muslims won't debate is because they

984
00:59:50.960 --> 00:59:55.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have good theology that's logical, Like, they won't do

985
00:59:55.679 --> 01:00:01.840
<v Speaker 1>logic debates. They're not good at logically debating because they

986
01:00:01.880 --> 01:00:04.599
<v Speaker 1>don't know typical basic fallacies. I'm not trying to be

987
01:00:04.679 --> 01:00:07.159
<v Speaker 1>mean to those guys. I'm not saying that none of

988
01:00:07.199 --> 01:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>them are good at debating. I'm saying that most of

989
01:00:09.519 --> 01:00:12.239
<v Speaker 1>them who talk all the smack, they don't know basic fallacies,

990
01:00:13.280 --> 01:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and so they'll talk about you use a bunch of

991
01:00:14.760 --> 01:00:18.199
<v Speaker 1>philosophy logic. Yeah, you can't debate without philosophy logic. There's

992
01:00:18.239 --> 01:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>no such thing as a debate that doesn't have criteria

993
01:00:21.559 --> 01:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of fallacies contradictions. That's called logic. Those are called fallacies.

994
01:00:26.039 --> 01:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>That's philosophy. That's the domain of philosophy. It's called logic.

995
01:00:28.960 --> 01:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Everybody knows this right.

996
01:00:32.679 --> 01:00:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, Okay, we got another one.

997
01:00:35.880 --> 01:00:39.000
<v Speaker 2>We have literally like two hundred questions.

998
01:00:40.280 --> 01:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>No, hold on, hold on, So there's a guy in

999
01:00:42.440 --> 01:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>the chat say that is false. No, your debates, You

1000
01:00:45.599 --> 01:00:50.119
<v Speaker 1>guys won't debate your texts. Shaver Eli did not want

1001
01:00:50.159 --> 01:00:52.679
<v Speaker 1>to debate his text. I don't just mean the text itself.

1002
01:00:52.719 --> 01:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about the theology of those texts, right, the

1003
01:00:56.480 --> 01:00:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Taoheed doctrine, the Tanzi doctrine. You don't want to debate

1004
01:00:59.800 --> 01:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>those doctrines. That's what I'm talking about. It's not a

1005
01:01:04.039 --> 01:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>cop dude, What are you talking about it? He says.

1006
01:01:05.960 --> 01:01:09.519
<v Speaker 1>He says, I'm copping out, dude. We've invited what's seven

1007
01:01:09.920 --> 01:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>six seven of your top scholars and they won't debate

1008
01:01:13.039 --> 01:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Shabira Lee. Credit to Shabira Lee because he did. So

1009
01:01:16.400 --> 01:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>what are you talking about? I'm not This is what

1010
01:01:17.920 --> 01:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you guys do? You say cop out when we invite

1011
01:01:20.440 --> 01:01:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you on all the time. There's an open invitation to

1012
01:01:23.480 --> 01:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Muhammed he Jubb yesterday, right undred four hundred, four hundred

1013
01:01:29.079 --> 01:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>likes on the tweet, two one hundred and twenty retweets,

1014
01:01:33.079 --> 01:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and he ignores the tweet like you didn't see it.

1015
01:01:35.079 --> 01:01:38.199
<v Speaker 1>Come on, come on, don't don't tell me it's a

1016
01:01:38.280 --> 01:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>cop out. When you guys won't come on in debate,

1017
01:01:45.119 --> 01:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean imagine inviting. So this is that we've done

1018
01:01:47.400 --> 01:01:50.559
<v Speaker 1>three public debates with Muslim No One of them. They're

1019
01:01:50.599 --> 01:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>top debaters. And their reply is, you're scared and you're

1020
01:01:53.880 --> 01:01:57.679
<v Speaker 1>copping out. We've invited what Lewis tell me? He isn't

1021
01:01:57.880 --> 01:01:59.679
<v Speaker 1>six seven Muslim scholars.

1022
01:01:59.719 --> 01:02:01.519
<v Speaker 2>Now it's like seven or eight?

1023
01:02:01.679 --> 01:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what are you talking about? Total nonsense? All right, sorry,

1024
01:02:07.440 --> 01:02:08.599
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, Grido, do.

1025
01:02:08.599 --> 01:02:09.119
<v Speaker 2>You want to Oh?

1026
01:02:11.039 --> 01:02:14.519
<v Speaker 4>So, someone asked, I know that there have been critiques

1027
01:02:14.559 --> 01:02:17.480
<v Speaker 4>of the Catholic view of Mary where they almost view

1028
01:02:17.559 --> 01:02:21.039
<v Speaker 4>her as a co source of salvation. How is this

1029
01:02:21.320 --> 01:02:25.239
<v Speaker 4>different in the Orthodox Church where they ask Mary to save.

1030
01:02:25.079 --> 01:02:29.199
<v Speaker 1>Us the same way that we ask anyone else to

1031
01:02:29.239 --> 01:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>pray for us and save us. Obviously her prayers have

1032
01:02:32.480 --> 01:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>more efficacy because she's the highest of God's creation. Right,

1033
01:02:36.480 --> 01:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>But Paul says, in doing so you will say you know,

1034
01:02:39.880 --> 01:02:42.159
<v Speaker 1>he says, keep this, this, this, and in doing so

1035
01:02:42.320 --> 01:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you will save those around you.

1036
01:02:44.559 --> 01:02:44.679
<v Speaker 13>Right?

1037
01:02:44.719 --> 01:02:48.519
<v Speaker 1>Does Paul mean that creatures become saviors like Jesus? No,

1038
01:02:48.719 --> 01:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the standard typical Protestant heretical slipped up on words.

1039
01:02:54.000 --> 01:02:56.159
<v Speaker 1>You guys get slipped up on words because, just like

1040
01:02:56.239 --> 01:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the Muslims, you think that words only have one meaning

1041
01:02:58.480 --> 01:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>in one sense. So it's just the word concept fallacy.

1042
01:03:01.719 --> 01:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>It's two different senses to salvation. Right, you can have

1043
01:03:04.639 --> 01:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a person who aids in your salvation without being the

1044
01:03:08.639 --> 01:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>ultimate source of the salvation. Paul says we are co

1045
01:03:11.679 --> 01:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>workers with God. Does that mean ah, he said, a

1046
01:03:14.000 --> 01:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>coworker with God. So Paul thinks we're equal to God.

1047
01:03:16.800 --> 01:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>You see what this is? Just silly. Nobody does this

1048
01:03:19.119 --> 01:03:21.719
<v Speaker 1>in the rest of their life, in the rest of

1049
01:03:21.800 --> 01:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>their texts. Right, you don't always squish. Yeah, you don't

1050
01:03:25.440 --> 01:03:28.119
<v Speaker 1>squish a word into only having one meaning in one sense.

1051
01:03:28.199 --> 01:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Nobody does this in the rest of their life. Right,

1052
01:03:31.039 --> 01:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>what does doctor bo say? A kid? Oh, a kid

1053
01:03:33.519 --> 01:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>always means a goat. Right, So if you have a kid,

1054
01:03:36.920 --> 01:03:38.519
<v Speaker 1>you have this is what are you talking about? It's

1055
01:03:38.559 --> 01:03:42.599
<v Speaker 1>different senses of the word. This is childishness. Anyway, I'm

1056
01:03:42.639 --> 01:03:48.159
<v Speaker 1>getting all wild up. Uh, just go watch Craig Triulia's

1057
01:03:48.480 --> 01:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>videos on Mary. He has plenty of great videos on

1058
01:03:51.400 --> 01:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Mary and the northodox Ya. So there's your answer.

1059
01:03:54.280 --> 01:03:56.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Greg, In.

1060
01:03:56.280 --> 01:04:01.119
<v Speaker 4>General, another one, Keny the deacon, you'd probably want to

1061
01:04:01.679 --> 01:04:05.360
<v Speaker 4>can you outline an atheist starter kit for Orthodoxy? What

1062
01:04:05.519 --> 01:04:09.639
<v Speaker 4>should be the duties of an ex atheist before joining

1063
01:04:09.719 --> 01:04:10.599
<v Speaker 4>the Orthodox Church?

1064
01:04:11.960 --> 01:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, Father Deacon, while you answered that I'm gonna go

1065
01:04:14.880 --> 01:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>we we So do you feel free to take over here.

1066
01:04:21.199 --> 01:04:25.599
<v Speaker 4>An atheist starter camp, start a kit? So, like what

1067
01:04:25.719 --> 01:04:29.679
<v Speaker 4>should like an atheist person, like what books should they read?

1068
01:04:30.159 --> 01:04:30.199
<v Speaker 3>Like?

1069
01:04:30.719 --> 01:04:33.920
<v Speaker 2>What what what should they buy first? Coming into Orthodoxy?

1070
01:04:35.960 --> 01:04:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Like nihilism?

1071
01:04:39.880 --> 01:04:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Father Sarah and Rise is great. Ye.

1072
01:04:45.320 --> 01:04:49.320
<v Speaker 5>I'd also probably supplement some of the Orthodox reads with.

1073
01:04:52.320 --> 01:04:58.199
<v Speaker 2>See because I'd say a lot of the atheists you

1074
01:04:58.400 --> 01:05:03.079
<v Speaker 2>encounter are just deficient in the rich history of kind.

1075
01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:09.039
<v Speaker 5>Of theism within the kind of concepts, even like Aristota

1076
01:05:09.079 --> 01:05:10.760
<v Speaker 5>on the Plato that.

1077
01:05:12.440 --> 01:05:14.519
<v Speaker 3>And then.

1078
01:05:16.840 --> 01:05:21.559
<v Speaker 5>John I would probably the Orthodox faith saying John Damascus

1079
01:05:22.320 --> 01:05:25.239
<v Speaker 5>would be good because then you're you're talking about the

1080
01:05:25.360 --> 01:05:37.079
<v Speaker 5>attributes God. Let's see, you could always have them reads.

1081
01:05:37.199 --> 01:05:40.679
<v Speaker 2>He's brothers. Karen is off too. That's converted a lot of.

1082
01:05:44.239 --> 01:05:44.360
<v Speaker 8>Uh.

1083
01:05:45.760 --> 01:05:54.880
<v Speaker 14>I'm trying to think, you know, just generally, something that

1084
01:05:54.960 --> 01:05:56.000
<v Speaker 14>I noticed is that.

1085
01:05:58.039 --> 01:06:03.039
<v Speaker 5>Most atheists that we encounter are generally deficient in the

1086
01:06:03.119 --> 01:06:05.800
<v Speaker 5>great works in literature and theology.

1087
01:06:06.719 --> 01:06:12.280
<v Speaker 2>So you know, Leje Toli, just take up and read it.

1088
01:06:13.239 --> 01:06:13.960
<v Speaker 2>That's what I mean.

1089
01:06:14.000 --> 01:06:19.159
<v Speaker 5>If you you never want a strong man your opponent's position,

1090
01:06:20.280 --> 01:06:26.119
<v Speaker 5>so when you go into debate, you know, like us,

1091
01:06:26.400 --> 01:06:32.480
<v Speaker 5>we read as much as possible of our opponents theology

1092
01:06:32.800 --> 01:06:35.079
<v Speaker 5>or philosophy and literature so.

1093
01:06:35.360 --> 01:06:37.719
<v Speaker 2>That we're not misrepresenting it, so that when we do

1094
01:06:37.880 --> 01:06:40.639
<v Speaker 2>form a critique, the critique is a good one. You

1095
01:06:40.679 --> 01:06:43.559
<v Speaker 2>don't want to ever straw Man. And I think that's

1096
01:06:43.639 --> 01:06:47.760
<v Speaker 2>something that most atheists could learn from.

1097
01:06:50.679 --> 01:06:53.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, you get these people like Lawrence Kraus, even

1098
01:06:53.119 --> 01:06:55.039
<v Speaker 5>like the popular atheists.

1099
01:06:56.440 --> 01:07:00.519
<v Speaker 2>Dockings. None of these people have studied philosophy.

1100
01:07:00.320 --> 01:07:04.880
<v Speaker 5>Let alone theology, yet they're going to formulate these stupid

1101
01:07:04.960 --> 01:07:09.440
<v Speaker 5>straw Man critiques. So again, I just think it would

1102
01:07:09.480 --> 01:07:14.039
<v Speaker 5>be a really good atheist starter kit, great books, liberal

1103
01:07:14.119 --> 01:07:17.599
<v Speaker 5>arts program. There you go, because you're going to get

1104
01:07:17.599 --> 01:07:19.000
<v Speaker 5>the church history of the philosophy.

1105
01:07:23.039 --> 01:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, Okay, I'm back and we're done.

1106
01:07:28.079 --> 01:07:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Yea. I was just saying that, actually, you know what

1107
01:07:30.960 --> 01:07:32.320
<v Speaker 2>a good atheist starter kit.

1108
01:07:32.280 --> 01:07:32.599
<v Speaker 3>Would be.

1109
01:07:35.159 --> 01:07:41.360
<v Speaker 5>Simply a great books, liberal arts program for atheists. Uh

1110
01:07:43.239 --> 01:07:48.360
<v Speaker 5>read Well, I'm just saying they're deficient in the literature.

1111
01:07:49.000 --> 01:07:52.800
<v Speaker 5>They don't even know, you know, what they're talking about

1112
01:07:52.920 --> 01:07:54.559
<v Speaker 5>when they're formulating these critiques.

1113
01:07:54.719 --> 01:07:57.559
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think I think it would be beneficial

1114
01:07:57.679 --> 01:08:01.400
<v Speaker 2>not just to read up on orthodox theology, but.

1115
01:08:02.920 --> 01:08:06.480
<v Speaker 5>The history of Western thought in general, going back a

1116
01:08:06.599 --> 01:08:08.000
<v Speaker 5>Greek philosophy as well.

1117
01:08:11.199 --> 01:08:14.239
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I guess I highly doubt Lawrence Craft ever read

1118
01:08:14.280 --> 01:08:15.199
<v Speaker 4>Crime and Punishment.

1119
01:08:20.079 --> 01:08:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, next question.

1120
01:08:21.960 --> 01:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Crime and Punishment is great, by the way, I highly

1121
01:08:23.920 --> 01:08:24.399
<v Speaker 1>recommend it.

1122
01:08:26.399 --> 01:08:29.680
<v Speaker 2>There's one of two thousand books on my reading list.

1123
01:08:30.800 --> 01:08:34.279
<v Speaker 2>I have a book for every year that I have

1124
01:08:34.359 --> 01:08:36.720
<v Speaker 2>a book for every year that the earth has existed.

1125
01:08:36.720 --> 01:08:39.079
<v Speaker 2>It's like two thousand, roughly two thousand.

1126
01:08:39.880 --> 01:08:40.199
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

1127
01:08:41.640 --> 01:08:47.039
<v Speaker 4>What significant theological differences exist between Eastern and Oriental orthodox

1128
01:08:47.680 --> 01:08:49.439
<v Speaker 4>other than the Calcedonian issue.

1129
01:08:49.520 --> 01:08:50.760
<v Speaker 2>I've not been able to find.

1130
01:08:50.560 --> 01:08:55.119
<v Speaker 4>A good articulation of their differences other than the Calcedonian controversy.

1131
01:08:56.960 --> 01:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>They're not united. A snack you could probably speak to this.

1132
01:08:59.720 --> 01:09:01.239
<v Speaker 1>If you're in here, you may have gone. I don't know,

1133
01:09:01.359 --> 01:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, they have a lot of division. They

1134
01:09:04.760 --> 01:09:06.279
<v Speaker 1>meet like once or twice a year, and they just

1135
01:09:06.359 --> 01:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of act like they're in communion. But they have

1136
01:09:08.640 --> 01:09:12.199
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of vast divergences amongst them, from animal sacrifice

1137
01:09:12.239 --> 01:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to circumcision to all kinds of bizarre things. So I'm

1138
01:09:16.880 --> 01:09:18.479
<v Speaker 1>not trying to be mean, but I mean that the

1139
01:09:18.640 --> 01:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Oriental quote unquote Orthodox Communion is not really any kind

1140
01:09:22.520 --> 01:09:25.039
<v Speaker 1>of unified thing at all. That's just in theory.

1141
01:09:26.159 --> 01:09:28.800
<v Speaker 15>It's more similar to the Anglican Commune, where they will

1142
01:09:28.840 --> 01:09:32.680
<v Speaker 15>have like new large differences and even like vising them,

1143
01:09:32.760 --> 01:09:36.039
<v Speaker 15>you will have you know, the Armenians today they are

1144
01:09:36.079 --> 01:09:44.039
<v Speaker 15>more Cacedonians in terms of christology. Yeah, again circumcision because

1145
01:09:44.079 --> 01:09:47.119
<v Speaker 15>in marriage, use of living and unleven bred.

1146
01:09:49.199 --> 01:09:50.319
<v Speaker 2>Animal sacrifice.

1147
01:09:51.920 --> 01:09:55.840
<v Speaker 16>Between these ches, you're forgetting one of the other crucial

1148
01:09:55.920 --> 01:09:59.560
<v Speaker 16>differences neck, which is that the Ethiopians have a different

1149
01:09:59.640 --> 01:10:03.920
<v Speaker 16>canon from the rest of the Oriental Orthodox, so they include.

1150
01:10:05.920 --> 01:10:09.079
<v Speaker 2>I mean we have slight variations again between the different works.

1151
01:10:09.640 --> 01:10:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Is that.

1152
01:10:11.479 --> 01:10:14.439
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, when it comes to the it's like really different,

1153
01:10:14.760 --> 01:10:17.520
<v Speaker 15>Like they literally have changes to the New Testament, which is.

1154
01:10:21.039 --> 01:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean there's all kinds of other issues too.

1155
01:10:23.119 --> 01:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean that the the the I mean, you got

1156
01:10:25.800 --> 01:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>like the poption out a writing a whole treatise a

1157
01:10:29.960 --> 01:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>few years ago against the Osis, which is I mean ludicrous, unfathomable.

1158
01:10:35.000 --> 01:10:37.159
<v Speaker 1>It reads like something James White would have written. I mean,

1159
01:10:37.520 --> 01:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the idea that you could be an Orthodox pope of

1160
01:10:39.960 --> 01:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Alexandria quote unquote, that's they're called the pope of Alexandria

1161
01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know you're the successor to Athanasius and

1162
01:10:47.960 --> 01:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you write a whole treatise against the Osis. I mean

1163
01:10:49.920 --> 01:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>this is just preposterous.

1164
01:10:53.439 --> 01:10:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1165
01:10:55.640 --> 01:10:58.520
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, some people opposed it in his

1166
01:10:58.680 --> 01:11:01.000
<v Speaker 2>church for doing this one.

1167
01:11:04.600 --> 01:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Snack snack you cut out there? Can you repeat that?

1168
01:11:09.199 --> 01:11:11.800
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, there's been a lot of opposition because it's inside

1169
01:11:11.840 --> 01:11:12.359
<v Speaker 15>this church.

1170
01:11:12.680 --> 01:11:16.319
<v Speaker 2>So this Matthews the poor where you have burst it.

1171
01:11:17.279 --> 01:11:20.560
<v Speaker 8>He read the Fathers in Greek and he taught Theosis

1172
01:11:20.600 --> 01:11:23.039
<v Speaker 8>and at this point and he was one of the

1173
01:11:23.079 --> 01:11:26.399
<v Speaker 8>biggest mystics of the Coptic quote.

1174
01:11:27.479 --> 01:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, imagine having this stress on the union, but right,

1175
01:11:31.000 --> 01:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean they have this over emphasis on union when

1176
01:11:34.640 --> 01:11:37.279
<v Speaker 1>it comes to who or what Christ is and then

1177
01:11:37.319 --> 01:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>turning around in denying Theosis. This is it's like, I

1178
01:11:40.800 --> 01:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I can't fathom how. But I mean when

1179
01:11:43.960 --> 01:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you when you read their theology in that guy's theology,

1180
01:11:46.680 --> 01:11:48.680
<v Speaker 1>or if you listen to David's debate, I mean, if

1181
01:11:48.680 --> 01:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you heard David's debate, it's they're they're like all over

1182
01:11:51.840 --> 01:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the place, right, you start talking about energies and they

1183
01:11:54.840 --> 01:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>don't even know. They're like, I don't know, Yeah, there's energies,

1184
01:11:58.039 --> 01:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>but maybe there's one or two or kind. I don't know.

1185
01:12:01.359 --> 01:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's come on, we have a clear, precise

1186
01:12:05.079 --> 01:12:09.159
<v Speaker 1>theology when it comes to person, nature, will, essence, energy,

1187
01:12:09.359 --> 01:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. It's consistent from the Triad to Christology.

1188
01:12:13.119 --> 01:12:15.039
<v Speaker 1>That's the big difference there too, is that they don't

1189
01:12:15.319 --> 01:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>see that there's a correspondence between nature, person, will, energy

1190
01:12:19.880 --> 01:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Triad into Christology. They disagree with that. Republicative predication,

1191
01:12:27.520 --> 01:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>reduplicate predication.

1192
01:12:28.640 --> 01:12:34.720
<v Speaker 4>Excuse me, Okay, what would you say to someone who

1193
01:12:34.840 --> 01:12:38.640
<v Speaker 4>claims that John seven, five, three through eight to eleven

1194
01:12:38.960 --> 01:12:42.600
<v Speaker 4>is a fabrication by the early Church to push Christianity

1195
01:12:42.760 --> 01:12:46.560
<v Speaker 4>over Mosaic law, or just the fabrication in general.

1196
01:12:48.000 --> 01:12:50.199
<v Speaker 1>We covered this in the James snapstream. We did a

1197
01:12:50.239 --> 01:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>whole stream on this. I don't even think it's out

1198
01:12:53.680 --> 01:12:57.199
<v Speaker 1>of accord with the Old Testament. Go listen to the

1199
01:12:57.279 --> 01:12:59.319
<v Speaker 1>James snapstream we did on textual history.

1200
01:13:00.600 --> 01:13:04.079
<v Speaker 6>So, yeah, because in mosaic law you had to have

1201
01:13:04.279 --> 01:13:08.159
<v Speaker 6>the man who she committed with you exactly.

1202
01:13:08.720 --> 01:13:09.880
<v Speaker 2>That was what the issue was.

1203
01:13:12.600 --> 01:13:15.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean in many in many other places, Jesus

1204
01:13:15.279 --> 01:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely upholds the continuity with the mosaic administration. So the

1205
01:13:19.640 --> 01:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>idea that there's not continuity is kind of ludicrous. But

1206
01:13:22.119 --> 01:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, Okay, this.

1207
01:13:25.039 --> 01:13:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Is for either you or Father de Yeah. Are my

1208
01:13:28.520 --> 01:13:34.319
<v Speaker 2>prayers for others, both alive and past, even uh even heard?

1209
01:13:34.479 --> 01:13:37.920
<v Speaker 4>If I'm not baptized in the Orthodox Church or participating

1210
01:13:37.960 --> 01:13:40.720
<v Speaker 4>in the EU Christ, do you have any recommended prayers

1211
01:13:40.800 --> 01:13:44.720
<v Speaker 4>for those who have died before finding Christ slash Orthodoxy?

1212
01:13:45.960 --> 01:13:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I would answer that yes, God can hear all prayers

1213
01:13:48.479 --> 01:13:51.359
<v Speaker 1>because God, it says God heard Cornelius's prayers before he

1214
01:13:51.479 --> 01:13:52.119
<v Speaker 1>was baptized.

1215
01:13:55.000 --> 01:13:57.159
<v Speaker 2>All right, Yeah, and you can use any prayers.

1216
01:13:58.560 --> 01:14:02.800
<v Speaker 6>The only place that non Orthodox aren't commemorated is that

1217
01:14:03.000 --> 01:14:07.239
<v Speaker 6>the alta in the preparation of the Eucharist in the Proscamede.

1218
01:14:07.520 --> 01:14:07.800
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

1219
01:14:10.279 --> 01:14:12.560
<v Speaker 16>Jordanville has a really good prayer book if you want

1220
01:14:12.600 --> 01:14:13.119
<v Speaker 16>one of those.

1221
01:14:13.920 --> 01:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, bather Digan, did you want to comment on that,

1222
01:14:15.880 --> 01:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean to cut you off.

1223
01:14:17.439 --> 01:14:20.399
<v Speaker 2>No, that's exactly correct answer.

1224
01:14:20.760 --> 01:14:21.439
<v Speaker 3>Of course, got.

1225
01:14:23.279 --> 01:14:27.560
<v Speaker 2>All our prayers. But at the same time it encourages.

1226
01:14:27.159 --> 01:14:31.239
<v Speaker 5>Us to go further into Orthodoxy because the prayers are

1227
01:14:31.279 --> 01:14:32.840
<v Speaker 5>a righteous man avails much.

1228
01:14:34.600 --> 01:14:36.840
<v Speaker 14>And so I try to use that.

1229
01:14:37.000 --> 01:14:42.039
<v Speaker 5>As you know, it's hard to motivate myself to do

1230
01:14:42.199 --> 01:14:45.880
<v Speaker 5>stuff when I just think about myself. But if I

1231
01:14:46.000 --> 01:14:49.079
<v Speaker 5>realize that you know, other people depend on me. And

1232
01:14:49.119 --> 01:14:50.640
<v Speaker 5>I don't know how all of you feel about this,

1233
01:14:50.840 --> 01:14:54.239
<v Speaker 5>but for me, that's kind of a motivating factor.

1234
01:14:54.760 --> 01:15:00.439
<v Speaker 2>At lights a fire and it needs me. And the that's.

1235
01:15:02.039 --> 01:15:05.159
<v Speaker 5>Something that we could do, is that know that you

1236
01:15:05.239 --> 01:15:08.840
<v Speaker 5>know other people depend on us, and that maybe I

1237
01:15:08.920 --> 01:15:12.760
<v Speaker 5>can't motivate myself to get, you know, further my spiritual life.

1238
01:15:14.439 --> 01:15:16.359
<v Speaker 2>The fact that if you get further into spiritual life,

1239
01:15:16.359 --> 01:15:18.880
<v Speaker 2>you will be helping others is a wonderful thing.

1240
01:15:19.640 --> 01:15:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Garbage man has a question for seven dollars that looks

1241
01:15:22.119 --> 01:15:26.159
<v Speaker 1>like it's probably intended to trap me. The position on

1242
01:15:27.159 --> 01:15:29.399
<v Speaker 1>the church is that the church is the new Israel.

1243
01:15:29.560 --> 01:15:32.239
<v Speaker 1>So that should tell you the obvious answer to that question.

1244
01:15:32.359 --> 01:15:34.159
<v Speaker 1>It shouldn't be very hard for you to figure that out.

1245
01:15:35.199 --> 01:15:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Although I do appreciate your appreciate your seven dollars. There

1246
01:15:38.359 --> 01:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>should be plenty of quotes that explain to you what

1247
01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:44.159
<v Speaker 1>our position is. Gert sends a dollar and he says,

1248
01:15:44.279 --> 01:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in the future garden City, will we go back to

1249
01:15:47.840 --> 01:15:52.359
<v Speaker 1>being androgynist beings described in Genesis? We're not androgynist beings.

1250
01:15:53.279 --> 01:16:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Genesis I don't think describes androgynist beings. So if you

1251
01:16:00.239 --> 01:16:04.039
<v Speaker 1>if you read uh Father Sara from Rose in Genesis

1252
01:16:04.119 --> 01:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Creation Early Man, he actually has a section where he

1253
01:16:05.880 --> 01:16:08.479
<v Speaker 1>talks about how he and I think he's correct. Uh,

1254
01:16:08.960 --> 01:16:12.319
<v Speaker 1>there there was gender before the fall. Some of the

1255
01:16:12.359 --> 01:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Eastern fathers speculated on this and speculator that maybe gender

1256
01:16:15.880 --> 01:16:19.279
<v Speaker 1>wasn't introduced after the Fall. I don't believe that. But obviously,

1257
01:16:19.399 --> 01:16:21.079
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Jay.

1258
01:16:21.039 --> 01:16:25.800
<v Speaker 5>I'd avoid the what's called the woke PC translation of

1259
01:16:26.640 --> 01:16:27.079
<v Speaker 5>the Bible.

1260
01:16:27.600 --> 01:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>We might actually get, Yeah, I get an orthodox study.

1261
01:16:31.760 --> 01:16:34.399
<v Speaker 1>By yeah, I would say, I don't know what, but

1262
01:16:34.479 --> 01:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>which which one are you talking about? Like N I

1263
01:16:36.000 --> 01:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>V or something or I'm just you mean, like when

1264
01:16:39.640 --> 01:16:42.279
<v Speaker 1>they come out with the like the the literal woke

1265
01:16:42.359 --> 01:16:51.119
<v Speaker 1>Bible exactly, they will probably have like the woke study Bible, right, Okay, And.

1266
01:16:51.520 --> 01:16:57.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's just a prosperity gospel and uh liberation theology.

1267
01:16:57.600 --> 01:16:57.840
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

1268
01:16:58.520 --> 01:17:00.720
<v Speaker 2>That's your wife stuff, right. Next question.

1269
01:17:02.199 --> 01:17:05.520
<v Speaker 4>The next question is what, if any difference is there

1270
01:17:05.640 --> 01:17:10.279
<v Speaker 4>between monophysitism and mea physicism. Is there an actual difference

1271
01:17:10.439 --> 01:17:13.840
<v Speaker 4>or is it just an attempt at obfuscation by the Orientals.

1272
01:17:15.039 --> 01:17:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean again, all of these have been dealt

1273
01:17:17.680 --> 01:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>with with hours and hours of streams with David me

1274
01:17:20.760 --> 01:17:24.159
<v Speaker 1>and David. David has an entire lecture course on this topic.

1275
01:17:24.239 --> 01:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>He just did a stream on my physicum. So go

1276
01:17:27.039 --> 01:17:29.279
<v Speaker 1>to David the real medwif's channel. He did a two

1277
01:17:29.359 --> 01:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>and a half hour stream on my ephicitism. And yes,

1278
01:17:33.479 --> 01:17:36.279
<v Speaker 1>there is an orthodox way to understand my physitism Saint

1279
01:17:36.760 --> 01:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Cyril of Alexander, the Christological controversy. That whole book is

1280
01:17:39.880 --> 01:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>written by Father John McGuckin to explain that topic. So no,

1281
01:17:43.680 --> 01:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>it's not all obbliscation. I'm not trying to be rude.

1282
01:17:48.399 --> 01:17:50.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying that one of the reasons that we

1283
01:17:50.479 --> 01:17:53.399
<v Speaker 1>do like a long two hour stream answering each one

1284
01:17:53.399 --> 01:17:56.279
<v Speaker 1>of these types of topics, whether it's John Denscotis or

1285
01:17:56.319 --> 01:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it's my physitism, is so that we don't have

1286
01:17:59.119 --> 01:18:03.079
<v Speaker 1>to like constantly rehearse, you know, an hour's worth of material.

1287
01:18:03.159 --> 01:18:05.279
<v Speaker 1>One reason I'm doing this is because when people come

1288
01:18:05.319 --> 01:18:07.079
<v Speaker 1>to the discord, which I'm fine with, I enjoy that,

1289
01:18:07.680 --> 01:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, every other day we're doing like five six

1290
01:18:10.800 --> 01:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>seven hour talks and then this you know, two days

1291
01:18:14.760 --> 01:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>later the same question comes up. How is some sooner

1292
01:18:17.640 --> 01:18:21.319
<v Speaker 1>just sinction, not pell I mean, not neoplatonism. And we've

1293
01:18:21.319 --> 01:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>already spent four hours the day before talking about that,

1294
01:18:24.880 --> 01:18:28.479
<v Speaker 1>so there's no point in just constantly redoing the same talk.

1295
01:18:29.000 --> 01:18:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not trying to be rude. I'm just saying

1296
01:18:30.680 --> 01:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that if David does twenty different streams explaining that very question,

1297
01:18:35.479 --> 01:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>go watch David's stream or read the mcguck and book

1298
01:18:41.560 --> 01:18:45.199
<v Speaker 1>searching for three dollars. I'm an atheist who finds myself

1299
01:18:45.399 --> 01:18:50.239
<v Speaker 1>unsatisfied with moral relativism and unanswered big questions. I can't

1300
01:18:50.520 --> 01:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>seem to accept any non empirical evidence outside of my senses.

1301
01:18:54.600 --> 01:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>How do I? And then it trails off. I can't

1302
01:18:56.680 --> 01:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>see the rest of it. So I mean, just think

1303
01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>about numbers and math objective or excuse me, abstract entities.

1304
01:19:03.720 --> 01:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>They're obviously not identical to empirical stuff. So you already

1305
01:19:07.520 --> 01:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>do believe in non empirical things. If you believe in logic,

1306
01:19:10.840 --> 01:19:16.079
<v Speaker 1>if you believe in math, geometry, you already believe concepts

1307
01:19:16.279 --> 01:19:19.119
<v Speaker 1>those are non empirical. So I would just argue that

1308
01:19:19.199 --> 01:19:24.159
<v Speaker 1>you already believe in non empirical evidence, because evidence as

1309
01:19:24.279 --> 01:19:28.159
<v Speaker 1>a concept is not matter. So when you say you

1310
01:19:28.279 --> 01:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>believe in evidence, it's non empirical already. That's my response

1311
01:19:33.920 --> 01:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to that. But thank you for this.

1312
01:19:34.840 --> 01:19:37.760
<v Speaker 6>If he, if he has issues, is more relativism. He

1313
01:19:37.920 --> 01:19:41.239
<v Speaker 6>presumably believes in the existence of moral facts, which are.

1314
01:19:41.760 --> 01:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Also not matter. Right, So you're talking about value judgments, right,

1315
01:19:44.880 --> 01:19:48.439
<v Speaker 1>if you're making a statement about something being morally wrong

1316
01:19:48.560 --> 01:19:51.239
<v Speaker 1>or right. Well, if everything's just matter, there are no

1317
01:19:51.319 --> 01:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>value judgments. Everything just is, you say, So saying something

1318
01:19:54.239 --> 01:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>is wrong requires categories that are not identical to or

1319
01:19:59.479 --> 01:20:02.199
<v Speaker 1>reducible will to matter or states of matter.

1320
01:20:02.960 --> 01:20:04.960
<v Speaker 2>It's called the naturalism, Pallas.

1321
01:20:04.760 --> 01:20:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, Thank you, But great question. They're searching much appreciate it.

1322
01:20:11.760 --> 01:20:15.560
<v Speaker 4>Okay, what happens to people who never heard of Orthodoxy

1323
01:20:15.800 --> 01:20:19.199
<v Speaker 4>after death? For example, the Pagans that died before they

1324
01:20:19.279 --> 01:20:20.840
<v Speaker 4>had contact with Christianity.

1325
01:20:21.119 --> 01:20:22.039
<v Speaker 2>How are they judged?

1326
01:20:22.520 --> 01:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think we had this same question about an

1327
01:20:24.960 --> 01:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>hour ago, and then we had the same question, yester,

1328
01:20:28.720 --> 01:20:31.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm just laughing because that's why we're doing this, So

1329
01:20:31.119 --> 01:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to keep doing this. I mean, so

1330
01:20:34.159 --> 01:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>again we have the heroing of Hades doctrine, everybody that

1331
01:20:37.600 --> 01:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>died before the coming of Christ were told in the

1332
01:20:40.039 --> 01:20:43.039
<v Speaker 1>New Testament they were in Hades. Peter says the Gospel

1333
01:20:43.159 --> 01:20:47.239
<v Speaker 1>was preached to those who were dead. Jesus descended into

1334
01:20:47.319 --> 01:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Hades at his death to preach the Gospel. The church

1335
01:20:51.039 --> 01:20:53.479
<v Speaker 1>fathers are very clear about this. Saint Cyril of Alexander

1336
01:20:53.600 --> 01:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>has multiple section wy he talks about this, and he says,

1337
01:20:56.239 --> 01:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the Gospel has preached to all of the Old Testament dead.

1338
01:21:01.399 --> 01:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>That's it now. People who nowadays die outside of hearing

1339
01:21:05.399 --> 01:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the Gospel. Paul says in the Romans too, that they

1340
01:21:07.920 --> 01:21:10.079
<v Speaker 1>have a light that is given to them the law

1341
01:21:10.119 --> 01:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of nature. They will be judged by the law of nature.

1342
01:21:11.920 --> 01:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean they're automatically saved. They still have to

1343
01:21:14.680 --> 01:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>have some exposure to Christ to attain theosis. You can

1344
01:21:17.960 --> 01:21:21.319
<v Speaker 1>be saved without theosis. So whether God preaches to them

1345
01:21:21.399 --> 01:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>in some way, we don't know. We leave that up

1346
01:21:23.359 --> 01:21:26.239
<v Speaker 1>to God. The Orthodox Church or the Eastern tradition is

1347
01:21:26.319 --> 01:21:28.640
<v Speaker 1>not as interested in trying to figure all this stuff

1348
01:21:28.640 --> 01:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>out because we're simply not told. Ubi Petris just did

1349
01:21:31.880 --> 01:21:36.319
<v Speaker 1>a giant floora gellium of the fate of unbaptized infants, right,

1350
01:21:36.439 --> 01:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and so go to Ubi Petris, and you'll see that

1351
01:21:39.880 --> 01:21:43.479
<v Speaker 1>we have a tradition of not really trying to speculate

1352
01:21:43.560 --> 01:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>other than to commend people to God. We don't know,

1353
01:21:46.560 --> 01:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>but we have the injunction that we have to preach

1354
01:21:48.720 --> 01:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the Gospel. We have to convert people. Whether God reaches

1355
01:21:52.840 --> 01:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>them in some unknown way is up to God.

1356
01:21:58.039 --> 01:22:03.399
<v Speaker 4>An interesting factoy into tradition, Plato heard the Gospel while

1357
01:22:03.439 --> 01:22:06.520
<v Speaker 4>in Hades and repented, and he actually appeared to a

1358
01:22:06.640 --> 01:22:09.760
<v Speaker 4>monk and told him to stop cursing him.

1359
01:22:10.520 --> 01:22:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Entirely possible. So I will there, funny, here is the

1360
01:22:17.560 --> 01:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Here is Ubi Petris's patristic list of fate of unbaptized infants.

1361
01:22:23.199 --> 01:22:25.319
<v Speaker 1>So that will kind of give you an insight into

1362
01:22:25.880 --> 01:22:28.479
<v Speaker 1>the question you're asking there. So you've got quotes from

1363
01:22:29.960 --> 01:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>iaron a is talking about the recapitulation that Christ's incarnation

1364
01:22:35.399 --> 01:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>reaches to all of human nature. Gregory, the theologian, Gregory,

1365
01:22:38.800 --> 01:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>of course, spoke often of this Ambrose, Innocent, Zosimus Carthage.

1366
01:22:47.359 --> 01:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>What else is in there, Gregory the Great? So that

1367
01:22:49.960 --> 01:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you'll you'll see that there is a kind of a uh,

1368
01:22:56.159 --> 01:22:59.199
<v Speaker 1>we should know that the when baptized infants die, they

1369
01:22:59.319 --> 01:23:03.079
<v Speaker 1>enjoy paradise. Those not illumined by baptism do not go

1370
01:23:03.199 --> 01:23:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to paradise nor gahinna. So that's on the Sunday of

1371
01:23:06.760 --> 01:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>meat fair, you see. So anyway, there's more in that link.

1372
01:23:11.239 --> 01:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>We don't speculate, We don't worry about those kinds of things.

1373
01:23:14.159 --> 01:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>We don't know. God doesn't tell us everything, so we

1374
01:23:16.960 --> 01:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>can't sit around speculating try to figure it out.

1375
01:23:20.720 --> 01:23:24.560
<v Speaker 4>Okay, we got a question, which is actually four questions

1376
01:23:25.159 --> 01:23:27.880
<v Speaker 4>from a Muslim, so we'll just go one by one.

1377
01:23:28.600 --> 01:23:31.880
<v Speaker 4>So how come the trinity is hard to explain when

1378
01:23:32.079 --> 01:23:36.600
<v Speaker 4>the Bible says in First Corinthians fourteen thirty three that

1379
01:23:36.840 --> 01:23:38.840
<v Speaker 4>God is not the author of introdusion.

1380
01:23:39.560 --> 01:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so just because Paul says God's not the author

1381
01:23:43.479 --> 01:23:45.399
<v Speaker 1>of confusion, if you look at the context, he's talking

1382
01:23:45.399 --> 01:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>about people who were being riotous in the church. He's

1383
01:23:47.840 --> 01:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>not talking about theology. Paul talks in many places about

1384
01:23:51.199 --> 01:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>difficult theological writings. In fact, Peter even says Paul's writings

1385
01:23:55.720 --> 01:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>are difficult, so difficult and meat Hebrews calls doctrine. That's me.

1386
01:24:01.800 --> 01:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not the same thing as confusion. The confusion that

1387
01:24:05.000 --> 01:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Corinthians is talking about is people getting drunk, people committing fornication,

1388
01:24:08.800 --> 01:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>people not taking the Lord's Supper seriously in all manner

1389
01:24:11.960 --> 01:24:16.079
<v Speaker 1>of you know, it sounds like a Protestant charismatic service

1390
01:24:16.119 --> 01:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that Paul is rebuking, right. I mean, he's saying, you

1391
01:24:18.600 --> 01:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>guys are acting like looms here, flopping around, acting crazy,

1392
01:24:21.960 --> 01:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>doing all kinds of nonsense. That's the confusions. He's not

1393
01:24:24.520 --> 01:24:29.640
<v Speaker 1>saying that there's no difficult theology. Your own Muslim schools

1394
01:24:29.680 --> 01:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of philosophy are difficult. So that's a terrible argument.

1395
01:24:34.960 --> 01:24:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'd also.

1396
01:24:35.680 --> 01:24:37.760
<v Speaker 6>Say, if you're interested in I just want to add

1397
01:24:37.880 --> 01:24:41.159
<v Speaker 6>is check out the videos I did with bo on

1398
01:24:41.239 --> 01:24:47.039
<v Speaker 6>the Trinity, because I think the current sort of popular

1399
01:24:47.600 --> 01:24:51.640
<v Speaker 6>Eganitarian or social Trinitarian view where the divine essence is,

1400
01:24:51.920 --> 01:24:55.399
<v Speaker 6>you know, God, is the problem that a lot of

1401
01:24:55.479 --> 01:24:58.479
<v Speaker 6>Muslims might end up having. So we need to reinstate

1402
01:24:58.600 --> 01:25:01.279
<v Speaker 6>the doctrine of the monarchia of the Father and the

1403
01:25:01.479 --> 01:25:05.000
<v Speaker 6>energies absolutely because if you go by Cappadocian theology, they

1404
01:25:05.159 --> 01:25:08.680
<v Speaker 6>absolutely reject. I mean, I'm sure if your listening Muslims,

1405
01:25:08.720 --> 01:25:11.239
<v Speaker 6>you know you're here that you know, oh yeah, well

1406
01:25:11.319 --> 01:25:13.680
<v Speaker 6>so there's the you know, there's the nature, and that's God.

1407
01:25:13.800 --> 01:25:16.039
<v Speaker 2>And then because all the persons participate in that, well

1408
01:25:16.079 --> 01:25:18.359
<v Speaker 2>that's how we we call why we call them God.

1409
01:25:18.479 --> 01:25:21.800
<v Speaker 6>But the whole, the whole premise of the Cappadocians who

1410
01:25:22.199 --> 01:25:25.039
<v Speaker 6>did to basically fleshed out the Trinitarian theology was to

1411
01:25:25.199 --> 01:25:27.840
<v Speaker 6>just absolutely deny that you could predicate any name of

1412
01:25:27.880 --> 01:25:33.239
<v Speaker 6>the divinessence, including God or anything. Okay, so that's not yeah,

1413
01:25:33.720 --> 01:25:36.239
<v Speaker 6>yeah no, So just check out the just check out

1414
01:25:36.279 --> 01:25:39.560
<v Speaker 6>the videos I did with both at Orthodox you had us.

1415
01:25:40.039 --> 01:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Just go over to my community tab on my channel

1416
01:25:42.640 --> 01:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>right there, the community tab, and if you look at

1417
01:25:44.760 --> 01:25:48.439
<v Speaker 1>the first one there, David has a three hour lecture

1418
01:25:48.520 --> 01:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>on Mayaphi site. So there's the answer to the myophasite question.

1419
01:25:51.600 --> 01:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Scroll down a little bit and I have a one

1420
01:25:54.039 --> 01:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>hour talk from two days ago with al Fadi on

1421
01:25:58.159 --> 01:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the monarchy of the Father. So it's all it's all

1422
01:26:00.680 --> 01:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>right there, or you can go to.

1423
01:26:03.000 --> 01:26:08.800
<v Speaker 5>My twenty four hour talk hours. By the way, guys,

1424
01:26:08.880 --> 01:26:12.239
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna I need. I want to say what a blessing,

1425
01:26:12.520 --> 01:26:18.600
<v Speaker 5>my prayers to you all and great questions and thank

1426
01:26:18.680 --> 01:26:21.880
<v Speaker 5>you Jay Lewis so Bros.

1427
01:26:23.560 --> 01:26:25.479
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Father. Well, I'm still here. We got we

1428
01:26:25.560 --> 01:26:27.319
<v Speaker 1>got our largest crowd yet, We're right.

1429
01:26:27.640 --> 01:26:29.119
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I just I just wanted to bow out in

1430
01:26:29.199 --> 01:26:32.239
<v Speaker 5>case there of questions directed at me. Okay, I'm sure

1431
01:26:32.279 --> 01:26:33.600
<v Speaker 5>you guys will be fine to answer that.

1432
01:26:33.880 --> 01:26:36.399
<v Speaker 1>I'll put Father Deacon in and eye. I'll put everybody's

1433
01:26:36.479 --> 01:26:39.039
<v Speaker 1>channels below as well. When the stream is done, so

1434
01:26:39.079 --> 01:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll be sure and follow Father Deacon and then they'll

1435
01:26:41.039 --> 01:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>have Lewis and Kai and everybody's snacks stuff too. So

1436
01:26:45.600 --> 01:26:49.239
<v Speaker 1>David as well, Thank you, Father, appreciate that absolutely.

1437
01:26:49.319 --> 01:26:50.760
<v Speaker 2>David. Yeah, O cool.

1438
01:26:50.800 --> 01:26:54.279
<v Speaker 6>Thanks to see if other from this, let's try let's

1439
01:26:54.359 --> 01:26:55.960
<v Speaker 6>keep trailblazing through these Muslim questions.

1440
01:26:56.000 --> 01:26:58.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, can you explain why the Trinity is not in

1441
01:26:59.039 --> 01:27:02.119
<v Speaker 4>the Old Testament and why it was only reviewed during

1442
01:27:02.239 --> 01:27:03.680
<v Speaker 4>Jesus's missionary.

1443
01:27:05.439 --> 01:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Like every debate and topic that we've had on this

1444
01:27:07.880 --> 01:27:10.640
<v Speaker 1>top on this question is arguing the Trinity from the

1445
01:27:10.680 --> 01:27:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Old Testament. So first of all, go look at all

1446
01:27:14.520 --> 01:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the things that we've done to date, every time that

1447
01:27:17.720 --> 01:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I've had a discussion with Sam, with any the whole

1448
01:27:20.960 --> 01:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>list that I put up on the whiteboard, it's all

1449
01:27:24.039 --> 01:27:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the Theophanes of the Old Testament. That's the Trinity. Okay, Father, Son,

1450
01:27:27.960 --> 01:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and Spirit are all over the Old Testament, so go

1451
01:27:30.680 --> 01:27:33.239
<v Speaker 1>watch those and you'll see where I cover all the

1452
01:27:33.319 --> 01:27:37.039
<v Speaker 1>Theophanes in Genesis. This is a personage separate from the

1453
01:27:37.119 --> 01:27:40.279
<v Speaker 1>person of the Father, who's given worship, who's given the

1454
01:27:40.319 --> 01:27:43.479
<v Speaker 1>divine name, who's called the Redeemer, who's called Yahweh, who's

1455
01:27:43.520 --> 01:27:46.239
<v Speaker 1>called the Lord, he's called God, he's called all of

1456
01:27:46.319 --> 01:27:49.640
<v Speaker 1>these things consistently. Right, I've done many, many talks. I

1457
01:27:50.079 --> 01:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>have a whole stream on the Theophanes and and the

1458
01:27:53.039 --> 01:27:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Trinity in the Old Testament. Just a stream on that

1459
01:27:55.359 --> 01:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you can go watch. That is Jesus God is the

1460
01:27:58.079 --> 01:28:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Trinity Biblical. That's whole stream against rocking mister e And

1461
01:28:01.520 --> 01:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>all I do is argue at this point, read Zechariah one.

1462
01:28:05.159 --> 01:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>There you'll see Father, Redeemer, Angel, the Lord, and Spirit.

1463
01:28:10.520 --> 01:28:12.399
<v Speaker 1>If you read the book of Isaiah. I just did

1464
01:28:12.439 --> 01:28:14.319
<v Speaker 1>a talk on Isaiah, and I talked about the many

1465
01:28:14.359 --> 01:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>instances where you find the triad in Isaiah. So the

1466
01:28:18.159 --> 01:28:22.640
<v Speaker 1>doctrine of the Trinity as explicated by the Cappadocians and

1467
01:28:22.760 --> 01:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>the Niceno Constantopolitan Creed is not in the Old Testament,

1468
01:28:27.279 --> 01:28:30.319
<v Speaker 1>because we believe in redemptive history that there is a

1469
01:28:30.800 --> 01:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>period where there's a coming of the Church that completes

1470
01:28:34.840 --> 01:28:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the fulfillments of the prophecies of the Old Testament. So

1471
01:28:38.079 --> 01:28:43.279
<v Speaker 1>obviously the life of the Messiah is not going to

1472
01:28:43.319 --> 01:28:46.119
<v Speaker 1>be present in its full form prior to the coming

1473
01:28:46.199 --> 01:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Messiah. Obviously the prophecies of Isaiah are not

1474
01:28:49.680 --> 01:28:53.239
<v Speaker 1>going to be present prior to Isaiah. So that's like saying,

1475
01:28:53.720 --> 01:28:57.079
<v Speaker 1>why isn't the fulfillment of all these things there before

1476
01:28:57.079 --> 01:29:00.159
<v Speaker 1>the fulfillment? It doesn't make any sense because of the

1477
01:29:00.239 --> 01:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>progression of progressive revelation, redemptive history, and the fulfillment of

1478
01:29:04.960 --> 01:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>these things when the Messiah comes. So obviously, look, that's like, look,

1479
01:29:09.720 --> 01:29:13.199
<v Speaker 1>there's not a full fledged, full revelation in the sense

1480
01:29:13.279 --> 01:29:17.239
<v Speaker 1>of what Isaiah has in the time of Abraham. Right,

1481
01:29:18.199 --> 01:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>does does Abraham know as much as Isaiah?

1482
01:29:21.000 --> 01:29:21.039
<v Speaker 2>No?

1483
01:29:21.760 --> 01:29:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Obviously would we therefore conclude from that that Isaiah is

1484
01:29:26.680 --> 01:29:30.399
<v Speaker 1>false because it's not fully revealed in Abraham's day all

1485
01:29:30.439 --> 01:29:33.199
<v Speaker 1>the things that Isaiah said. Of course, not so in

1486
01:29:33.279 --> 01:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the same way, just because not everything that's fully revealing

1487
01:29:36.880 --> 01:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in the New Testament is not present in the Old Testament.

1488
01:29:39.920 --> 01:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>We don't cancel it out. That's just presupposing that we're

1489
01:29:42.560 --> 01:29:45.279
<v Speaker 1>not the fulfillment, but we are the fulfillment. That's the

1490
01:29:45.319 --> 01:29:48.439
<v Speaker 1>point here, right. The New Testament is the fulfillment of

1491
01:29:48.600 --> 01:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>what the Old Testament is. Looking forward to countless Old

1492
01:29:51.800 --> 01:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Testament prophecy. How many times does it say the gentiles

1493
01:29:54.920 --> 01:29:57.439
<v Speaker 1>will be brought into the Covenant, that they will be

1494
01:29:57.640 --> 01:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>worshiping the God of Israel, and that when the Gentiles

1495
01:30:01.039 --> 01:30:03.399
<v Speaker 1>begin to convert in mass, that's when you'll know the

1496
01:30:03.479 --> 01:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Messiah has come. And what do you know, when Jesus

1497
01:30:05.640 --> 01:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>comes suddenly entire Gentile nations for centuries, for millennia converting. Obviously,

1498
01:30:11.079 --> 01:30:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Jesus is the Messiah. So this kind of Muslim argument

1499
01:30:14.600 --> 01:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>just is based on ignorance about our theology and the

1500
01:30:18.680 --> 01:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>notion of the completion of the Old Testament prophecies in

1501
01:30:22.119 --> 01:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the person of Christ.

1502
01:30:24.520 --> 01:30:27.039
<v Speaker 6>Can I add to that, guy I Chris here he

1503
01:30:27.560 --> 01:30:30.840
<v Speaker 6>can add as well, is the we have to really

1504
01:30:30.880 --> 01:30:33.439
<v Speaker 6>consider also that even in Islam there's a development of

1505
01:30:33.479 --> 01:30:38.560
<v Speaker 6>the theology of God over debates for centuries after the Qur'an.

1506
01:30:39.800 --> 01:30:41.800
<v Speaker 6>I don't know, you may not. Whoever asked a question

1507
01:30:41.920 --> 01:30:43.960
<v Speaker 6>may not be familiar with this, but there ends up

1508
01:30:44.039 --> 01:30:51.079
<v Speaker 6>being a very specific formulation of what attributes there are,

1509
01:30:51.279 --> 01:30:55.159
<v Speaker 6>what an attribute is, what constitutes an attribute, how they

1510
01:30:55.279 --> 01:30:58.479
<v Speaker 6>relate to creation, whether or not, how they relate to

1511
01:30:58.560 --> 01:31:01.560
<v Speaker 6>the essence of God, and those are very precise, and

1512
01:31:01.640 --> 01:31:04.479
<v Speaker 6>they're not contained in that in their formulation of as

1513
01:31:04.560 --> 01:31:08.920
<v Speaker 6>part of Klam philosophy inside the inside the Qur'an, but

1514
01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:12.520
<v Speaker 6>they are still required believing for people who are part

1515
01:31:12.560 --> 01:31:14.760
<v Speaker 6>of those schools. So I don't know if you're if

1516
01:31:14.800 --> 01:31:17.720
<v Speaker 6>you're a Salafie, but that's mainstream Synism anyway.

1517
01:31:17.960 --> 01:31:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but as we see every time we get into

1518
01:31:20.239 --> 01:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>this kind of argument, it's moved the goalposts. Right, Oh

1519
01:31:22.920 --> 01:31:24.239
<v Speaker 1>that's the case for you, but not for me.

1520
01:31:29.439 --> 01:31:35.880
<v Speaker 3>But in all fairness, if I can just must yeah, yeah.

1521
01:31:36.359 --> 01:31:42.199
<v Speaker 13>Muslims in the majority, they are even just completey ignorant

1522
01:31:42.399 --> 01:31:45.840
<v Speaker 13>of their own traditions, and so they don't even know

1523
01:31:46.159 --> 01:31:51.399
<v Speaker 13>that there was this development within Islam itself. They are

1524
01:31:51.840 --> 01:31:55.640
<v Speaker 13>typically of a mindset like that Islam is has been

1525
01:31:55.760 --> 01:32:00.159
<v Speaker 13>static for fourteen hundred years, that it was revealed and

1526
01:32:00.600 --> 01:32:05.319
<v Speaker 13>hasn't changed one bit, and so they just either there's

1527
01:32:05.359 --> 01:32:08.760
<v Speaker 13>just a dumbfounded when you start encountering them on this,

1528
01:32:08.920 --> 01:32:10.119
<v Speaker 13>and then they'll just start making up.

1529
01:32:10.119 --> 01:32:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Excuses and this and that, switching positions. Yeah.

1530
01:32:15.119 --> 01:32:18.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's just important to note that, you know, if

1531
01:32:18.760 --> 01:32:22.279
<v Speaker 6>you want to, you know, we're happy to say, for

1532
01:32:22.359 --> 01:32:25.159
<v Speaker 6>the sake of debate, if you're willing to accept that

1533
01:32:25.199 --> 01:32:27.880
<v Speaker 6>our scriptures hold our core doctrines, then we're happy to

1534
01:32:28.000 --> 01:32:31.159
<v Speaker 6>accept that the Quran holds the you know, the specific

1535
01:32:32.399 --> 01:32:35.479
<v Speaker 6>like ashari or matter ready formulation for the sake of debate.

1536
01:32:35.600 --> 01:32:38.239
<v Speaker 6>But you know, if you're going to use that argument,

1537
01:32:38.319 --> 01:32:40.640
<v Speaker 6>you know that the trinity that even the hardware or

1538
01:32:40.720 --> 01:32:43.560
<v Speaker 6>as Jay use, the analogy of the gems, the the

1539
01:32:43.880 --> 01:32:47.279
<v Speaker 6>or the raw or of the trinity isn't in the

1540
01:32:47.359 --> 01:32:50.479
<v Speaker 6>biblical text. Then you know, we're just going to say that,

1541
01:32:50.840 --> 01:32:54.439
<v Speaker 6>you know that the attribute specific attribute theology isn't there

1542
01:32:54.479 --> 01:32:55.399
<v Speaker 6>in the Quran.

1543
01:32:55.199 --> 01:33:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Either, right exactly? Yeah, excellent point. How chicken baby five

1544
01:33:01.359 --> 01:33:06.159
<v Speaker 1>dollars can you explain the Trinity? For NWBS? There is

1545
01:33:06.239 --> 01:33:10.119
<v Speaker 1>an eight minute video that somebody clipped where I did

1546
01:33:10.520 --> 01:33:13.039
<v Speaker 1>this kind of an explanation of the Trinity. I think

1547
01:33:13.159 --> 01:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it's on this Institium Bourbum website or channel. I'll post that,

1548
01:33:17.840 --> 01:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>but basically, we believe on the basis of what's in

1549
01:33:22.039 --> 01:33:24.640
<v Speaker 1>revelation what the Trinity is right, so it's not sitting

1550
01:33:24.680 --> 01:33:28.439
<v Speaker 1>around and philosophically speculating. Primarily that gives us the doctor

1551
01:33:28.479 --> 01:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Trinity at scripture. So the Old Testament reveals

1552
01:33:31.439 --> 01:33:35.479
<v Speaker 1>God the Father, and God the Father has this secondary

1553
01:33:36.680 --> 01:33:40.239
<v Speaker 1>person that he generates that is the Angel of the Lord,

1554
01:33:40.359 --> 01:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that is the Messenger of the Covenant, that is the

1555
01:33:42.640 --> 01:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Angel Redeemer. In the Old Testament, there's many, many, many passages.

1556
01:33:46.640 --> 01:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Again I've gone over this many many times, and that

1557
01:33:51.319 --> 01:33:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Angel of the Lord so to speak, is revealed to

1558
01:33:53.800 --> 01:33:57.319
<v Speaker 1>be fully divine right and eventually revealed as the Son

1559
01:33:57.359 --> 01:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of God. We say so, we say that that is

1560
01:33:59.680 --> 01:34:02.479
<v Speaker 1>Jesus right, because Jesus the Trinity has always been there.

1561
01:34:02.520 --> 01:34:05.800
<v Speaker 1>It's always been who God is. It didn't change or

1562
01:34:05.840 --> 01:34:09.119
<v Speaker 1>become three gods or something like this. It's always been Father, Son,

1563
01:34:09.159 --> 01:34:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and Spirit. But the full revelation of that was progressive.

1564
01:34:13.239 --> 01:34:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Now even in Judaism there's progressive revelation. Again, they don't

1565
01:34:17.760 --> 01:34:22.199
<v Speaker 1>believe that Isaiah or excuse me, in the time of Abraham,

1566
01:34:22.439 --> 01:34:25.319
<v Speaker 1>that you know, Abraham knew as much as Isaiah would

1567
01:34:25.399 --> 01:34:27.479
<v Speaker 1>know or Malachi or any of the later prophets right,

1568
01:34:27.520 --> 01:34:31.720
<v Speaker 1>because there's more revelation that comes via the Spirit of

1569
01:34:31.760 --> 01:34:36.079
<v Speaker 1>God speaking through the Old Testament prophets. So this revelation

1570
01:34:36.279 --> 01:34:39.479
<v Speaker 1>is progressive. It never contradicts previous revelation. But it's very

1571
01:34:39.560 --> 01:34:43.439
<v Speaker 1>clear in again dozens and dozens and dozens of passages

1572
01:34:43.479 --> 01:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Old Testament that it's not just a strict

1573
01:34:47.199 --> 01:34:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Father God. There's also this Angel of the Lord, this

1574
01:34:50.960 --> 01:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>theophanic manifestation that wrestles with Jacob, that speaks to Manoah's parents,

1575
01:34:55.760 --> 01:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that goes to battle for the Israelites, that's present in

1576
01:34:59.119 --> 01:35:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the the burning bush right, that appears to David, even

1577
01:35:03.880 --> 01:35:08.119
<v Speaker 1>in the historical books, that appears over the altar of Israel,

1578
01:35:08.960 --> 01:35:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the cloud, the pillar, over and over and over. We

1579
01:35:11.079 --> 01:35:14.079
<v Speaker 1>see this stuff throughout the Old Testament. Ezekiel sees, and

1580
01:35:14.159 --> 01:35:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel one, and Ezekiel ten, Ezekiel one, and Ezigel nine

1581
01:35:17.359 --> 01:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and ten. This wheel and then in the midst of

1582
01:35:20.239 --> 01:35:22.840
<v Speaker 1>this chariot that he sees is one like the son

1583
01:35:22.880 --> 01:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of Man. That's the same one like a son of

1584
01:35:25.039 --> 01:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Man that Daniel sees right in his vision in Daniel seven.

1585
01:35:28.359 --> 01:35:31.359
<v Speaker 1>It's the same that's what we're saying, that's all we're saying. Now,

1586
01:35:31.880 --> 01:35:36.039
<v Speaker 1>that's Father, that's son, and spirit. Spirit is mentioned many times, right,

1587
01:35:36.119 --> 01:35:39.479
<v Speaker 1>It's mentioned in Genesis, it's mentioned in Zechariah one, it's

1588
01:35:39.520 --> 01:35:43.119
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in Isaiah. So we consistently see in many, even

1589
01:35:43.279 --> 01:35:47.399
<v Speaker 1>in many chapters of Isaiah, this triadic manifestation of Father,

1590
01:35:48.000 --> 01:35:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Angel of the Lord, Messenger's son, and the Spirit of

1591
01:35:51.399 --> 01:35:53.199
<v Speaker 1>the Lord. The Spirit of the Lord does this spirit.

1592
01:35:53.479 --> 01:35:55.359
<v Speaker 1>So how is the Spirit of the Lord doing this

1593
01:35:55.479 --> 01:36:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and that and yet also being distinguished from Father and Messenger,

1594
01:36:00.800 --> 01:36:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Angel of the Lord logos. Well, because there's three persons.

1595
01:36:05.000 --> 01:36:07.039
<v Speaker 1>And when we get to the New Testament, which again

1596
01:36:07.079 --> 01:36:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we're saying, is the fulfillments, the full explanation and explication

1597
01:36:11.079 --> 01:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Old Testament, there's not a discontinuity. It's continuity. Right.

1598
01:36:16.000 --> 01:36:18.680
<v Speaker 1>When we see Jesus in the Book of John, especially

1599
01:36:18.800 --> 01:36:20.319
<v Speaker 1>not just the Book of John, but in the Book

1600
01:36:20.319 --> 01:36:25.039
<v Speaker 1>of John right fourteen, sixteen seventeen, he goes into linky

1601
01:36:25.119 --> 01:36:29.079
<v Speaker 1>explanations of the relationship between him and the Father and

1602
01:36:29.279 --> 01:36:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the Spirit who he will send. So it's imperfect. When

1603
01:36:33.800 --> 01:36:37.159
<v Speaker 1>you are really fluent in the Old Testament, you see

1604
01:36:37.199 --> 01:36:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it everywhere it's like it's a no brainer. It's like, well, yeah,

1605
01:36:40.920 --> 01:36:42.399
<v Speaker 1>this is everywhere in the Old Testament. What are you

1606
01:36:42.439 --> 01:36:46.399
<v Speaker 1>talking about? So the fact that modern day Jews debate

1607
01:36:46.520 --> 01:36:51.079
<v Speaker 1>over this is really irrelevant to our position. It doesn't

1608
01:36:51.079 --> 01:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>mean anything. I mean, it's just relevant in the sense

1609
01:36:53.640 --> 01:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's like an academic you know, dispute or whatever.

1610
01:36:56.079 --> 01:36:59.840
<v Speaker 1>But to our theology, it doesn't matter because we don't

1611
01:36:59.880 --> 01:37:04.000
<v Speaker 1>have the same theology as modern Judaism obviously. I mean,

1612
01:37:04.039 --> 01:37:08.319
<v Speaker 1>you see rabbinical debates after you know, the the first

1613
01:37:08.439 --> 01:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>century with Judaism and Christianity part ways. When you get

1614
01:37:12.000 --> 01:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the eventually the different talmuds that are that are put together,

1615
01:37:15.920 --> 01:37:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you see debates amongst rabbis over what these Theophanes are,

1616
01:37:20.520 --> 01:37:22.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, is it the essence of God? Is it

1617
01:37:22.279 --> 01:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a second manifestation of God? Is it an emanation? Is

1618
01:37:25.079 --> 01:37:27.960
<v Speaker 1>it uh, some sort of angelic metatron being?

1619
01:37:28.159 --> 01:37:28.439
<v Speaker 5>Is it this?

1620
01:37:28.680 --> 01:37:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Is it that?

1621
01:37:29.520 --> 01:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Is it a hologram an angel? Right, so they have

1622
01:37:31.840 --> 01:37:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the same debates right going on that we will see

1623
01:37:35.840 --> 01:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>when we bring this topic up. Right, It's an echo

1624
01:37:38.680 --> 01:37:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of the debate that that Justin Martyr has with Tripho.

1625
01:37:43.039 --> 01:37:45.279
<v Speaker 1>What does Justin mart keep going to the Angel of

1626
01:37:45.319 --> 01:37:48.479
<v Speaker 1>the Lord. Right, Why is the Angel Lord given worship?

1627
01:37:49.279 --> 01:37:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Only God can be worshiped anyway. So the easiest way

1628
01:37:55.800 --> 01:37:58.239
<v Speaker 1>to start with the Trinity is I got lost in

1629
01:37:58.279 --> 01:38:00.479
<v Speaker 1>that explanation. But these way to start with this is

1630
01:38:00.560 --> 01:38:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to start with the Bible. Right, So we're not because

1631
01:38:02.840 --> 01:38:06.159
<v Speaker 1>we're not basing this on philosophy like oh the you know,

1632
01:38:06.279 --> 01:38:08.119
<v Speaker 1>I sat around and I read a bunch of Plato,

1633
01:38:08.159 --> 01:38:10.159
<v Speaker 1>and I figured out, you know, based on number theory,

1634
01:38:10.239 --> 01:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that now there are analogies that you can make to

1635
01:38:12.800 --> 01:38:15.279
<v Speaker 1>numbers and this kind of stuff. Think about one to

1636
01:38:15.359 --> 01:38:19.119
<v Speaker 1>the third power, right, that's one thing and three things

1637
01:38:19.159 --> 01:38:21.399
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. Think about the number three. It's

1638
01:38:22.039 --> 01:38:24.319
<v Speaker 1>singular and it's also triadic at once.

1639
01:38:24.520 --> 01:38:24.600
<v Speaker 13>Right.

1640
01:38:24.640 --> 01:38:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I Mean, there's all kinds of things in the world

1641
01:38:26.920 --> 01:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that do have a one and many aspects to them

1642
01:38:30.000 --> 01:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that the church fathers frequently make usage of to demonstrate

1643
01:38:33.920 --> 01:38:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a one many relationship that's analogous to God, not a

1644
01:38:36.720 --> 01:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>one to one correspondent's been an analogy. They do it

1645
01:38:39.720 --> 01:38:43.880
<v Speaker 1>all the time. They do mind, will and soul right

1646
01:38:44.079 --> 01:38:48.159
<v Speaker 1>or spirit as an analogy, on on and on. So

1647
01:38:48.239 --> 01:38:50.560
<v Speaker 1>there's all kinds of things that are analogous to something

1648
01:38:50.640 --> 01:38:56.439
<v Speaker 1>being one and many. But there's no perfect creaturely analog

1649
01:38:56.760 --> 01:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>or one to one correspondence to God because God may

1650
01:39:00.199 --> 01:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the creatures, and so by definition God being infinite, being omniscient, etc.

1651
01:39:05.119 --> 01:39:07.359
<v Speaker 1>There's never going to be anything that perfectly matches up

1652
01:39:07.399 --> 01:39:11.199
<v Speaker 1>to God. So that's why we're talking about on one level,

1653
01:39:11.279 --> 01:39:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a revelation for us that is kind of the final authority.

1654
01:39:15.520 --> 01:39:17.479
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean that it's out of accord with

1655
01:39:17.680 --> 01:39:21.079
<v Speaker 1>logic or reasoning or these kinds of things. Because the

1656
01:39:21.199 --> 01:39:25.520
<v Speaker 1>created world and the logic and the principles of logic, numbers, math,

1657
01:39:25.640 --> 01:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever that God has put into place in the created order,

1658
01:39:29.399 --> 01:39:32.439
<v Speaker 1>they do bear some correspondence to the mind of God.

1659
01:39:33.279 --> 01:39:35.319
<v Speaker 1>And so there can be at one at a certain

1660
01:39:35.399 --> 01:39:39.399
<v Speaker 1>level and analogia analogies that are made, but we don't

1661
01:39:39.479 --> 01:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>do a one to one correspondence as if the number

1662
01:39:42.680 --> 01:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>one is equal to God's unity. God's unity is not

1663
01:39:46.800 --> 01:39:49.239
<v Speaker 1>identical to the number one. The number one is a

1664
01:39:49.359 --> 01:39:50.279
<v Speaker 1>created concept.

1665
01:39:54.840 --> 01:39:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Next mism question, Okay, so this is or from the

1666
01:39:58.960 --> 01:39:59.359
<v Speaker 2>same guy.

1667
01:40:00.079 --> 01:40:04.479
<v Speaker 4>The next not mind memory boring questions, So do you

1668
01:40:04.560 --> 01:40:07.600
<v Speaker 4>believe the Bible is preserved or even a trustworthy document

1669
01:40:07.680 --> 01:40:09.720
<v Speaker 4>about the life of Jesus and his teachings.

1670
01:40:10.319 --> 01:40:13.079
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, we have we have to believe that. I mean

1671
01:40:13.119 --> 01:40:15.479
<v Speaker 1>that the doctrine of the inspirational Scriptures is part of

1672
01:40:15.560 --> 01:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>our dogmatic theology. There's no church father who denies that.

1673
01:40:20.560 --> 01:40:23.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the next part and then thank God, we can

1674
01:40:23.279 --> 01:40:25.760
<v Speaker 2>move on. He says, if you have Okay, So he's

1675
01:40:25.760 --> 01:40:27.720
<v Speaker 2>posing necessarily.

1676
01:40:27.359 --> 01:40:29.279
<v Speaker 6>If the Bible, if we believe it is not preserved,

1677
01:40:29.359 --> 01:40:30.720
<v Speaker 6>you don't need we don't need to ask that one.

1678
01:40:31.880 --> 01:40:33.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think we'll just skip that.

1679
01:40:33.199 --> 01:40:36.119
<v Speaker 6>I mean he said, he said, he said, if you

1680
01:40:36.239 --> 01:40:39.079
<v Speaker 6>accept the Bible is not preserved, the question for but

1681
01:40:39.359 --> 01:40:41.159
<v Speaker 6>we we accept as preserved.

1682
01:40:41.199 --> 01:40:44.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's yeah, we don't accept that premise.

1683
01:40:44.159 --> 01:40:48.560
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it's dumb. Okay. It's like saying, can you

1684
01:40:48.680 --> 01:40:50.439
<v Speaker 2>imagine infinity?

1685
01:40:50.600 --> 01:40:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Could you imagine a well, where's that? Imagine a universe?

1686
01:40:55.479 --> 01:40:59.079
<v Speaker 1>Was there is a planet with a computer and no gun?

1687
01:41:00.960 --> 01:41:01.600
<v Speaker 3>The quant.

1688
01:41:03.680 --> 01:41:07.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, if you have the machine else maybe they can

1689
01:41:07.720 --> 01:41:08.760
<v Speaker 4>take chill infinity.

1690
01:41:09.800 --> 01:41:11.239
<v Speaker 2>Uh okay.

1691
01:41:11.319 --> 01:41:14.159
<v Speaker 4>Next, is is there any good Orthodox books that deal

1692
01:41:14.239 --> 01:41:16.319
<v Speaker 4>with Buddhism or Eastern religions?

1693
01:41:16.520 --> 01:41:19.479
<v Speaker 2>Does Saint Nicholas in Japan have any books on this subject?

1694
01:41:20.119 --> 01:41:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Orthodoxy in the religion the future deals with the far

1695
01:41:22.840 --> 01:41:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern religions. The now of Christ deals with the Eastern religions.

1696
01:41:28.079 --> 01:41:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's what I mean, Baba seraph and rises

1697
01:41:32.640 --> 01:41:33.760
<v Speaker 2>biography has.

1698
01:41:33.680 --> 01:41:35.640
<v Speaker 3>Some good stuff in that.

1699
01:41:36.079 --> 01:41:40.840
<v Speaker 1>The easiest, the easiest response is just orthodoxy in the

1700
01:41:40.880 --> 01:41:43.920
<v Speaker 1>religion in the future, because he's he's talking about Hinduism.

1701
01:41:44.039 --> 01:41:45.880
<v Speaker 1>But I mean that's kind of encompasses all of them.

1702
01:41:45.880 --> 01:41:51.039
<v Speaker 2>Really, Okay, does the Guru, the young man, and older

1703
01:41:51.079 --> 01:41:58.720
<v Speaker 2>parties right humans? Yes?

1704
01:42:01.640 --> 01:42:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

1705
01:42:02.880 --> 01:42:07.239
<v Speaker 4>Does Islam have a one and many problem? For example,

1706
01:42:07.359 --> 01:42:09.560
<v Speaker 4>if truth is one in many, how can the Islamic

1707
01:42:09.600 --> 01:42:13.640
<v Speaker 4>God be the metaphysical metaphysical condition for the multiplicity of

1708
01:42:13.800 --> 01:42:17.800
<v Speaker 4>unity of truth itself when Allah is without multiplicity in

1709
01:42:17.920 --> 01:42:18.319
<v Speaker 4>his being?

1710
01:42:19.319 --> 01:42:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly. I mean that's an argument I've been making

1711
01:42:23.039 --> 01:42:27.279
<v Speaker 1>sure well stated.

1712
01:42:28.720 --> 01:42:33.199
<v Speaker 6>The mainstream Sunny position has more multiplicity in God than

1713
01:42:33.399 --> 01:42:39.720
<v Speaker 6>the Motazila Ads position that was rejected by mainstream Studdyism.

1714
01:42:41.600 --> 01:42:41.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1715
01:42:41.800 --> 01:42:43.720
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, even though there's all these different schools

1716
01:42:44.479 --> 01:42:48.439
<v Speaker 1>because of the you know, emphasis on the transcendence of

1717
01:42:48.479 --> 01:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>God in Islam, I don't think you're going to ever

1718
01:42:51.039 --> 01:42:54.319
<v Speaker 1>get a really sufficient coherent answer to that problem. So

1719
01:42:54.520 --> 01:42:57.960
<v Speaker 1>there's always going to be the assumption of unicity as

1720
01:42:58.079 --> 01:43:06.279
<v Speaker 1>metaphysically a ontologically prior or primary or superior. So they

1721
01:43:06.359 --> 01:43:12.000
<v Speaker 1>can't really do justice to uh distinctions or multiplicity. And

1722
01:43:12.079 --> 01:43:14.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, it doesn't matter if they admit that

1723
01:43:16.319 --> 01:43:19.319
<v Speaker 1>as well. But we don't have three persons and so therefore,

1724
01:43:19.479 --> 01:43:23.039
<v Speaker 1>but the same problem arises with the attributes or the

1725
01:43:23.399 --> 01:43:26.079
<v Speaker 1>actions of Allah. The same problem is still there.

1726
01:43:29.920 --> 01:43:31.039
<v Speaker 3>Okay. Yeah.

1727
01:43:31.079 --> 01:43:33.520
<v Speaker 6>That was one of the Jewish and Metazula critiques of

1728
01:43:33.600 --> 01:43:35.920
<v Speaker 6>the Asheri and mat Ready position was that it was

1729
01:43:36.000 --> 01:43:38.640
<v Speaker 6>too Christian because you believed in like they believed in,

1730
01:43:38.840 --> 01:43:41.239
<v Speaker 6>you know, subsistent attributes that weren't Allah.

1731
01:43:42.039 --> 01:43:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Mm hmm. The problem that.

1732
01:43:48.960 --> 01:43:51.560
<v Speaker 1>We can't hear you. You have to speak up, you're

1733
01:43:51.560 --> 01:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>really low.

1734
01:43:54.159 --> 01:43:57.760
<v Speaker 13>God has to be absolutely unique, which makes it difficult

1735
01:43:57.800 --> 01:44:00.760
<v Speaker 13>when you up at the group of.

1736
01:44:00.760 --> 01:44:05.680
<v Speaker 2>God such with life that are probably showed by Greek.

1737
01:44:06.960 --> 01:44:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's no analogy in that position.

1738
01:44:08.800 --> 01:44:11.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the one of the many problem meticods very clearly.

1739
01:44:15.039 --> 01:44:20.560
<v Speaker 4>Okay, next question, I'm confused about the Christian explanation of suffering,

1740
01:44:20.680 --> 01:44:23.159
<v Speaker 4>and I'm hopeful that the Orthodox view can offer a

1741
01:44:23.239 --> 01:44:26.640
<v Speaker 4>more compelling explanation than the Protestant one, How did sin

1742
01:44:27.079 --> 01:44:29.880
<v Speaker 4>have the effect of changing the fabric of reality from

1743
01:44:29.920 --> 01:44:33.560
<v Speaker 4>the perfect pre false state to the current state after

1744
01:44:33.720 --> 01:44:36.640
<v Speaker 4>the fall, so as to introduce suffering to the world.

1745
01:44:37.079 --> 01:44:39.399
<v Speaker 4>It seems like the laws of physics themselves are in

1746
01:44:40.199 --> 01:44:44.079
<v Speaker 4>are inhospitable to human life and course suffering. Example, a

1747
01:44:44.239 --> 01:44:46.640
<v Speaker 4>rock can fall on one's head while walking under a cliff,

1748
01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:51.399
<v Speaker 4>and this seems to be entirely causally disconnected from man's

1749
01:44:51.479 --> 01:44:55.920
<v Speaker 4>sinful nature. How is sin connected with altering the laws

1750
01:44:55.960 --> 01:44:57.279
<v Speaker 4>of physics post fall?

1751
01:45:00.079 --> 01:45:01.840
<v Speaker 1>If you want, if you're asking how in the sense

1752
01:45:01.880 --> 01:45:05.199
<v Speaker 1>of the mechanics, nobody knows that. If you're asking how

1753
01:45:05.319 --> 01:45:09.479
<v Speaker 1>in the sense of theological revelation, well, we're told that

1754
01:45:09.600 --> 01:45:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the case, because the entire it's not like all

1755
01:45:14.079 --> 01:45:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of the fabric of reality was changed. I mean man's body.

1756
01:45:18.239 --> 01:45:22.119
<v Speaker 1>We have animalistic bodies because of the fall. Right, we

1757
01:45:22.199 --> 01:45:24.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the pre false state of man's body

1758
01:45:24.960 --> 01:45:27.399
<v Speaker 1>was like. We don't know what Eden was like. But

1759
01:45:27.640 --> 01:45:32.039
<v Speaker 1>all of the way the normal course of things function

1760
01:45:32.279 --> 01:45:35.840
<v Speaker 1>did not have, for example, the presence of decay, the

1761
01:45:35.880 --> 01:45:38.199
<v Speaker 1>presence of death. All those things were foreign to Eden,

1762
01:45:39.520 --> 01:45:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and we believe it on the basis of what's revealed, right,

1763
01:45:42.119 --> 01:45:45.600
<v Speaker 1>so we don't we don't have to have an explanation

1764
01:45:45.720 --> 01:45:49.199
<v Speaker 1>of the mechanics of exactly what, you know, the chemical

1765
01:45:49.239 --> 01:45:51.960
<v Speaker 1>reactions that occurred when the fall happened. I mean, nobody's

1766
01:45:52.000 --> 01:45:56.000
<v Speaker 1>ever going to know that. So, but whether there is

1767
01:45:56.079 --> 01:46:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a connection between death and events to the natural world

1768
01:46:01.000 --> 01:46:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and man sin, we believe it on the basis of revelation.

1769
01:46:06.159 --> 01:46:09.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I also like that that is a very high

1770
01:46:09.399 --> 01:46:12.960
<v Speaker 2>IQ way of asking the question, if God real, why

1771
01:46:13.079 --> 01:46:17.600
<v Speaker 2>bad things happened? It was Yeah, very high IQ.

1772
01:46:18.000 --> 01:46:22.079
<v Speaker 1>But the same question Chris says for thirteen dollars and

1773
01:46:22.199 --> 01:46:24.800
<v Speaker 1>nine cents, God bless you for your work. Well, thank you, Chris,

1774
01:46:24.920 --> 01:46:25.880
<v Speaker 1>much appreciated for that.

1775
01:46:32.039 --> 01:46:37.319
<v Speaker 4>Okay, trying to find guys, please don't clutter it with

1776
01:46:37.479 --> 01:46:40.600
<v Speaker 4>your like Jay's answering questions, not you.

1777
01:46:40.720 --> 01:46:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Guys, So please don't clutter it with your answers. Okay,

1778
01:46:46.159 --> 01:46:48.000
<v Speaker 2>where can someone from a.

1779
01:46:48.039 --> 01:46:53.680
<v Speaker 4>Schismatic Apostolic church find out where they differ specifically as

1780
01:46:53.760 --> 01:46:56.760
<v Speaker 4>in the reason why they are considered outside of the church.

1781
01:46:58.640 --> 01:47:01.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess that would depend on what schismatic

1782
01:47:01.399 --> 01:47:05.760
<v Speaker 1>episode church you're talking about. That I mean, you're asking

1783
01:47:05.880 --> 01:47:08.560
<v Speaker 1>me where to find out how your church differs. I

1784
01:47:08.600 --> 01:47:09.640
<v Speaker 1>don't understand the question.

1785
01:47:11.319 --> 01:47:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, are so let's see very Antichalcedonian.

1786
01:47:16.520 --> 01:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know what question I mean again, go

1787
01:47:22.720 --> 01:47:25.319
<v Speaker 1>watch David's videos if you're looking for where we say

1788
01:47:25.680 --> 01:47:26.479
<v Speaker 1>we disagree with you.

1789
01:47:28.520 --> 01:47:32.039
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, David's videos are really good. The Orientals are just

1790
01:47:32.279 --> 01:47:32.920
<v Speaker 4>scared of him.

1791
01:47:34.119 --> 01:47:40.920
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, let's see.

1792
01:47:44.359 --> 01:47:47.880
<v Speaker 4>If God is the infinite source of all being, from

1793
01:47:47.920 --> 01:47:50.640
<v Speaker 4>which everything ultimately emerges, how can it.

1794
01:47:50.680 --> 01:47:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Be that evil things are not from God?

1795
01:47:53.239 --> 01:47:55.000
<v Speaker 4>I want to believe that God is good, but it

1796
01:47:55.039 --> 01:47:58.199
<v Speaker 4>seems like I can't reconcile this with the notion of

1797
01:47:58.319 --> 01:47:59.319
<v Speaker 4>God being.

1798
01:47:59.199 --> 01:48:00.520
<v Speaker 2>The source of all that exists.

1799
01:48:01.720 --> 01:48:05.880
<v Speaker 1>So evil has no being and no subsistent ontological status.

1800
01:48:06.079 --> 01:48:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Evil is not a metaphysical reality. It's a negation, it's

1801
01:48:09.439 --> 01:48:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a privation. It's a movement of the will away from

1802
01:48:11.880 --> 01:48:15.239
<v Speaker 1>the good. So you will find that from the earliest

1803
01:48:15.319 --> 01:48:17.960
<v Speaker 1>days of the Church up until to present day, we

1804
01:48:18.039 --> 01:48:22.199
<v Speaker 1>have always explained what evil is in this way. So

1805
01:48:22.319 --> 01:48:28.079
<v Speaker 1>we differ from pagan religions, from dualistic religions, Manicheanisms, or Astrianism,

1806
01:48:28.439 --> 01:48:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and that we do not predicate any real existence to evil.

1807
01:48:32.600 --> 01:48:35.319
<v Speaker 1>That does not mean that we're not saying there's no evil.

1808
01:48:36.000 --> 01:48:38.399
<v Speaker 1>We're not saying there's no evil, we're saying that there's

1809
01:48:38.399 --> 01:48:42.960
<v Speaker 1>no metaphysical, ontological status or substance to evil. Because when

1810
01:48:43.000 --> 01:48:45.960
<v Speaker 1>God created the world, all that was created he said

1811
01:48:46.199 --> 01:48:50.760
<v Speaker 1>was good. So being is inherently good. Being manifests the

1812
01:48:50.880 --> 01:48:54.319
<v Speaker 1>quality of goodness because it's made in the image of

1813
01:48:54.479 --> 01:48:57.479
<v Speaker 1>and on the basis of God's being, which is good.

1814
01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:01.159
<v Speaker 1>God is good, His creation is good. It shares in

1815
01:49:01.239 --> 01:49:05.359
<v Speaker 1>a participatory relationship with the goodness of God. So in

1816
01:49:05.479 --> 01:49:11.159
<v Speaker 1>that way, nothing that exists or has being can be evil.

1817
01:49:11.680 --> 01:49:15.640
<v Speaker 1>So what is evil, Well, evil is only a privation,

1818
01:49:16.279 --> 01:49:19.359
<v Speaker 1>it is only a negation. It is only a movement

1819
01:49:19.399 --> 01:49:21.479
<v Speaker 1>of the will away from the good. If we want

1820
01:49:21.479 --> 01:49:24.279
<v Speaker 1>to use an analogy, we could think of something like numbers, right,

1821
01:49:24.560 --> 01:49:28.359
<v Speaker 1>negative numbers. Do they have an existence? Not really? I

1822
01:49:28.439 --> 01:49:32.119
<v Speaker 1>mean they're a movement away from one right, And so

1823
01:49:32.279 --> 01:49:35.479
<v Speaker 1>in the same way, analogies to evil are things like darkness,

1824
01:49:36.199 --> 01:49:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, non existence, non being. Those are the many

1825
01:49:40.039 --> 01:49:43.720
<v Speaker 1>types of analogies that are used for moral evil. So

1826
01:49:43.880 --> 01:49:46.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not so much a metaphysical thing as it is

1827
01:49:46.920 --> 01:49:48.079
<v Speaker 1>a moral thing.

1828
01:49:50.039 --> 01:49:51.279
<v Speaker 2>Would you would you agree.

1829
01:49:51.079 --> 01:49:56.479
<v Speaker 6>With misstatement, like something like the lion increases in being

1830
01:49:56.640 --> 01:49:58.399
<v Speaker 6>and the zebra decreases in being.

1831
01:50:00.680 --> 01:50:02.840
<v Speaker 2>No, that's like when the lion kills like when the

1832
01:50:02.960 --> 01:50:04.000
<v Speaker 2>lion kills.

1833
01:50:03.760 --> 01:50:08.159
<v Speaker 1>The zebra some ludicrous, What do you I mean, Because.

1834
01:50:07.880 --> 01:50:10.840
<v Speaker 6>That's just that's tomistic, Like it's because the lion, because

1835
01:50:10.960 --> 01:50:14.319
<v Speaker 6>the lion is for its own good, the lions seeking

1836
01:50:14.359 --> 01:50:16.479
<v Speaker 6>its own good and fulfilling its own good.

1837
01:50:16.520 --> 01:50:18.520
<v Speaker 2>But the zebra. Obviously what's going on for the zebra

1838
01:50:18.680 --> 01:50:19.000
<v Speaker 2>is bad.

1839
01:50:19.159 --> 01:50:22.680
<v Speaker 1>So but that wouldn't have anything to do with their

1840
01:50:22.920 --> 01:50:25.399
<v Speaker 1>their status in terms of existence itself.

1841
01:50:27.560 --> 01:50:30.039
<v Speaker 6>No, yeah, but I mean in terms of just like

1842
01:50:30.279 --> 01:50:34.880
<v Speaker 6>good and evil, the zebra is being privated of it's good.

1843
01:50:35.680 --> 01:50:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, that's that's so. Even the Western Church makes

1844
01:50:38.479 --> 01:50:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the Latins even make a distinction between different types of

1845
01:50:41.560 --> 01:50:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the senses of evil. So there's a the privatory sense

1846
01:50:45.680 --> 01:50:48.199
<v Speaker 1>is an analogy for the moral sense. So if we

1847
01:50:48.279 --> 01:50:51.199
<v Speaker 1>say that there's you know, if I lack sight, that's

1848
01:50:51.279 --> 01:50:53.439
<v Speaker 1>not the same thing as a moral evil. It's a privation.

1849
01:50:53.640 --> 01:50:57.439
<v Speaker 1>I lack the faculty of eyesight, so it's a it's

1850
01:50:57.479 --> 01:51:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a negation. But that's even distinguished from moral evil, which

1851
01:51:01.880 --> 01:51:04.800
<v Speaker 1>is you know, when I intentionally move my will away

1852
01:51:04.840 --> 01:51:07.199
<v Speaker 1>from the good to do something evil. So even the

1853
01:51:07.279 --> 01:51:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Latins will distinguish that.

1854
01:51:10.960 --> 01:51:12.880
<v Speaker 13>If I could just add on to that, There's one

1855
01:51:14.039 --> 01:51:18.000
<v Speaker 13>egesis of Genesis that I really like in terms of

1856
01:51:18.600 --> 01:51:22.880
<v Speaker 13>connecting this kind of question is if you notice Day

1857
01:51:22.960 --> 01:51:27.319
<v Speaker 13>two of creation is not followed by and it was

1858
01:51:27.399 --> 01:51:32.000
<v Speaker 13>good or God identifying it as good. And the one

1859
01:51:32.039 --> 01:51:34.199
<v Speaker 13>thing that you can notice here is this is in

1860
01:51:34.319 --> 01:51:38.520
<v Speaker 13>creation where you start seeing a separation. And so then

1861
01:51:38.840 --> 01:51:42.159
<v Speaker 13>the separation would be analogous to this kind of privation

1862
01:51:42.479 --> 01:51:46.439
<v Speaker 13>or moving away from God. And if you're moving away

1863
01:51:46.439 --> 01:51:49.079
<v Speaker 13>from God, that is what is not good, that is

1864
01:51:50.000 --> 01:51:51.119
<v Speaker 13>analogous to the sin.

1865
01:51:52.119 --> 01:51:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean the darkness of Genesis one is not evil, right,

1866
01:51:55.880 --> 01:52:00.359
<v Speaker 1>It's some sort of you know, potentiality within creation for

1867
01:52:01.399 --> 01:52:04.560
<v Speaker 1>God organizing, you know, the creative world, you know, the

1868
01:52:04.640 --> 01:52:08.640
<v Speaker 1>original abyss, whatever that is. It's not inherently evil. And

1869
01:52:08.760 --> 01:52:11.880
<v Speaker 1>again darkness just like just like darkness isn't evil, right.

1870
01:52:11.920 --> 01:52:14.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, scripture says you made the day, you made

1871
01:52:14.399 --> 01:52:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the night, right, there's nothing wrong with with nighttime? Okay.

1872
01:52:18.159 --> 01:52:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Those are just analogies to moral movement away, like when

1873
01:52:22.399 --> 01:52:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we say you are far from God. Right, it's not

1874
01:52:24.920 --> 01:52:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a spatiotempal relationship. It's a spiritual moral relationship. But that's

1875
01:52:29.600 --> 01:52:34.479
<v Speaker 1>a good point. Kai kung pal chicken wait. Searching for

1876
01:52:34.560 --> 01:52:39.279
<v Speaker 1>a dollar says uh, searching for Windell says Is the

1877
01:52:39.399 --> 01:52:46.119
<v Speaker 1>evidence for logic working equivalent to the evidence for God's existence? No,

1878
01:52:46.880 --> 01:52:49.720
<v Speaker 1>because I would say that in order to ground logic itself,

1879
01:52:49.920 --> 01:52:52.119
<v Speaker 1>you need the type of God that we argue for.

1880
01:52:52.359 --> 01:52:55.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not equating God to logic. How should I

1881
01:52:55.880 --> 01:52:59.920
<v Speaker 1>start my journey to believe voice? How do I know? Voices?

1882
01:53:01.520 --> 01:53:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Voices in my head are not the general God. So

1883
01:53:05.680 --> 01:53:10.159
<v Speaker 1>we don't go from those kinds of like you know,

1884
01:53:10.359 --> 01:53:13.760
<v Speaker 1>personal mystical experiences. You might have a mystical experience, but

1885
01:53:13.840 --> 01:53:17.279
<v Speaker 1>that's not how we go by knowing God or knowing

1886
01:53:17.439 --> 01:53:21.920
<v Speaker 1>these religious truths. Again, Scripture is where we start. Scripture

1887
01:53:22.000 --> 01:53:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is the primary source of revealed theology. There's other sources

1888
01:53:25.880 --> 01:53:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that it comes to tradition and you read the Fathers

1889
01:53:29.000 --> 01:53:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and this kind of stuff too, But like it starts

1890
01:53:31.560 --> 01:53:35.600
<v Speaker 1>in scripture and nobody denies this right, So you're not

1891
01:53:35.760 --> 01:53:38.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be listening to and this is a temptation

1892
01:53:38.640 --> 01:53:40.039
<v Speaker 1>I think for a lot of people who are maybe

1893
01:53:40.159 --> 01:53:45.159
<v Speaker 1>new to Christianity or whatever. They start thinking, Oh, it's

1894
01:53:45.239 --> 01:53:47.800
<v Speaker 1>God telling me to not go to this to work

1895
01:53:47.840 --> 01:53:50.079
<v Speaker 1>at this place anymore. Oh, God's telling me not that.

1896
01:53:51.359 --> 01:53:54.479
<v Speaker 1>You need the first and foremost learn what God's telling

1897
01:53:54.520 --> 01:53:58.279
<v Speaker 1>you from scripture, not from what you think you feel

1898
01:53:58.359 --> 01:54:01.119
<v Speaker 1>at this and that time. That a way, don't worry

1899
01:54:01.119 --> 01:54:04.600
<v Speaker 1>about it. You need to be catechized in scripture and

1900
01:54:04.720 --> 01:54:08.760
<v Speaker 1>in the church. Then you can make the accurate judgment

1901
01:54:08.880 --> 01:54:11.479
<v Speaker 1>calls as to well, God was telling me that I

1902
01:54:11.560 --> 01:54:13.560
<v Speaker 1>need to move to this city. God's telling me I

1903
01:54:13.640 --> 01:54:16.680
<v Speaker 1>need to date this person or not date that. God's

1904
01:54:16.760 --> 01:54:19.920
<v Speaker 1>telling you what's in scripture first of all, and then

1905
01:54:19.960 --> 01:54:24.199
<v Speaker 1>you're making your life decisions on being in accordance with

1906
01:54:24.279 --> 01:54:27.119
<v Speaker 1>what's in scripture. Right, So don't listen to this like

1907
01:54:27.239 --> 01:54:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the charismatic gibberish nonsense. Right, if you want to be married,

1908
01:54:32.760 --> 01:54:35.199
<v Speaker 1>God gives you the freedom to make that choice. If

1909
01:54:35.239 --> 01:54:38.119
<v Speaker 1>you want to be single and inter amonastery, God gives

1910
01:54:38.159 --> 01:54:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you that freedom if you want to make that choice.

1911
01:54:40.159 --> 01:54:40.279
<v Speaker 11>Right.

1912
01:54:41.279 --> 01:54:43.840
<v Speaker 1>But so often people are like worried about God's will

1913
01:54:43.920 --> 01:54:45.800
<v Speaker 1>for their life or what God's will is in scripture.

1914
01:54:46.039 --> 01:54:48.319
<v Speaker 1>He tells you what to do right. I'm not saying

1915
01:54:48.359 --> 01:54:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you can't have like a providential event that helps you

1916
01:54:52.000 --> 01:54:55.319
<v Speaker 1>make decisions. But people are so obsessed.

1917
01:54:54.920 --> 01:54:55.399
<v Speaker 2>With like this.

1918
01:54:56.119 --> 01:54:58.119
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait for the dreams and the visions and

1919
01:54:58.199 --> 01:54:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this kind of stuff. No, don't even worry about that.

1920
01:55:00.680 --> 01:55:03.840
<v Speaker 1>God has told you what is good. Scripture says, so

1921
01:55:03.920 --> 01:55:06.399
<v Speaker 1>you don't. You don't have to go through that bunch

1922
01:55:06.439 --> 01:55:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of nonsense. You are. We already know what the will

1923
01:55:09.880 --> 01:55:13.399
<v Speaker 1>of God is. It's revealed in scripture and in tradition

1924
01:55:13.479 --> 01:55:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in the church. All Right, it cut out there Sometimes

1925
01:55:18.960 --> 01:55:21.119
<v Speaker 1>discord crashes. But are you guys still there?

1926
01:55:22.319 --> 01:55:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm here.

1927
01:55:23.359 --> 01:55:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Can you hear me?

1928
01:55:24.199 --> 01:55:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, sir, very good. I literally just lost my place.

1929
01:55:30.039 --> 01:55:31.319
<v Speaker 2>Give me a second. Six.

1930
01:55:31.399 --> 01:55:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Okay. He has shown you, oh man, what is good

1931
01:55:34.960 --> 01:55:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to do? Justice, love, righteousness, you know, et cetera. Scripture

1932
01:55:38.000 --> 01:55:42.960
<v Speaker 1>says this. You don't have to be hunkered over in

1933
01:55:43.039 --> 01:55:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a corner, flopping around the ground speaking gibberish, waiting for

1934
01:55:46.920 --> 01:55:49.920
<v Speaker 1>some so called prophet in the charismatic church to tell

1935
01:55:49.960 --> 01:55:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you what God's will is. It's in scripture, dude.

1936
01:55:53.600 --> 01:55:54.800
<v Speaker 3>And we have a history.

1937
01:55:55.000 --> 01:55:57.319
<v Speaker 2>We have a historical question. Do you believe that the

1938
01:55:57.399 --> 01:55:59.920
<v Speaker 2>shroud of Turin was housed in Constantine.

1939
01:56:00.960 --> 01:56:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any opinion on it. I don't know.

1940
01:56:03.119 --> 01:56:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not opposed to this.

1941
01:56:04.159 --> 01:56:05.640
<v Speaker 2>It was, Isn't that historical?

1942
01:56:05.920 --> 01:56:06.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

1943
01:56:06.319 --> 01:56:08.800
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I mean, how can you have an opinion

1944
01:56:08.880 --> 01:56:10.319
<v Speaker 6>on a historical fact.

1945
01:56:12.880 --> 01:56:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, I suppose some people can doubt what's believed to

1946
01:56:16.520 --> 01:56:18.720
<v Speaker 1>be historical facts. I mean, it happens in Academia.

1947
01:56:21.880 --> 01:56:25.359
<v Speaker 6>Well, I thought the Crusaders took it from Constantinople back

1948
01:56:25.439 --> 01:56:27.279
<v Speaker 6>to Venice.

1949
01:56:28.159 --> 01:56:29.119
<v Speaker 3>That's what I understood.

1950
01:56:30.199 --> 01:56:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't again, I don't have any pro or con

1951
01:56:32.960 --> 01:56:37.359
<v Speaker 1>opinion of the shroud. I'm fine with it being Jesus

1952
01:56:37.840 --> 01:56:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and a real relic or not. I don't have any

1953
01:56:40.720 --> 01:56:41.239
<v Speaker 1>opinion on it.

1954
01:56:43.119 --> 01:56:47.239
<v Speaker 4>Next question is, would you, father, deacon, or another orthodoxicologist

1955
01:56:47.319 --> 01:56:51.000
<v Speaker 4>in the circle consider writing a big book addressing frequently

1956
01:56:51.119 --> 01:56:53.119
<v Speaker 4>asked questions about Orthodoxy.

1957
01:56:53.239 --> 01:56:54.960
<v Speaker 2>There's probably a book for it already.

1958
01:56:55.199 --> 01:56:57.520
<v Speaker 1>No, probably not. Yeah, I mean I think we have

1959
01:56:57.840 --> 01:56:58.840
<v Speaker 1>plenty of those already.

1960
01:56:59.079 --> 01:57:03.439
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, if we have plenty of catechisms, Like I'm.

1961
01:57:03.359 --> 01:57:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Not a catechist, right, if you want to come to

1962
01:57:05.520 --> 01:57:07.239
<v Speaker 1>the discord, and you know, there's plenty of people who

1963
01:57:07.239 --> 01:57:09.560
<v Speaker 1>can do catechisis that's I'm not here to do that.

1964
01:57:10.520 --> 01:57:13.600
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, Yeah, the.

1965
01:57:13.640 --> 01:57:17.159
<v Speaker 6>Admins here can do basic katakiss, so the baptized ones.

1966
01:57:17.159 --> 01:57:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, there's plenty of resources for that.

1967
01:57:20.800 --> 01:57:27.359
<v Speaker 2>So what is your view on divine command theory?

1968
01:57:29.279 --> 01:57:31.560
<v Speaker 1>We have an aspect of divine command theory, but we

1969
01:57:31.680 --> 01:57:36.159
<v Speaker 1>also have aspects of the other views. I mean, if

1970
01:57:36.199 --> 01:57:40.479
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about moral justification like Utafro dilemma.

1971
01:57:40.239 --> 01:57:40.359
<v Speaker 3>Is that?

1972
01:57:40.439 --> 01:57:40.840
<v Speaker 13>What is that?

1973
01:57:40.880 --> 01:57:41.520
<v Speaker 1>What they're getting at?

1974
01:57:43.640 --> 01:57:47.039
<v Speaker 2>That was just a question what was your view of it?

1975
01:57:47.520 --> 01:57:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Right?

1976
01:57:47.880 --> 01:57:52.880
<v Speaker 1>So if you're talking about the Utafro dilemma, I mean

1977
01:57:52.960 --> 01:57:56.039
<v Speaker 1>I've answered this this many many times. We did Kallopian Club.

1978
01:57:56.159 --> 01:57:59.560
<v Speaker 1>We had two different hour long discussions and two different

1979
01:58:00.960 --> 01:58:04.079
<v Speaker 1>discord amas where we argued over this question. And I

1980
01:58:04.199 --> 01:58:09.800
<v Speaker 1>try to explain that we don't equate the command of

1981
01:58:09.920 --> 01:58:13.840
<v Speaker 1>God with so God doesn't have to submit to a

1982
01:58:13.960 --> 01:58:16.800
<v Speaker 1>rule that's higher than him. And every time this question

1983
01:58:16.920 --> 01:58:18.720
<v Speaker 1>is framed in the youth throw of the limit, they say, well,

1984
01:58:18.760 --> 01:58:22.159
<v Speaker 1>then therefore God can just will the good to be

1985
01:58:22.359 --> 01:58:25.520
<v Speaker 1>something opposite to itself. We don't believe that because we

1986
01:58:25.600 --> 01:58:29.359
<v Speaker 1>have a different conception of God and the essence energy distinction. Right,

1987
01:58:29.439 --> 01:58:34.760
<v Speaker 1>God's commands God's actions. What comes from God is on

1988
01:58:34.880 --> 01:58:37.279
<v Speaker 1>the basis of his character, but it's not identical to

1989
01:58:37.399 --> 01:58:40.520
<v Speaker 1>his character, so we don't identify God's will with his essence.

1990
01:58:48.560 --> 01:58:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Rip erse.

1991
01:58:53.880 --> 01:58:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Onward as theo Von says, onward.

1992
01:58:58.680 --> 01:58:59.880
<v Speaker 7>Okay, now what a back.

1993
01:59:06.079 --> 01:59:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, next question.

1994
01:59:08.199 --> 01:59:12.439
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So next question is what was the limit of

1995
01:59:12.640 --> 01:59:15.119
<v Speaker 4>the Byzantine emperor's powers in the church.

1996
01:59:15.279 --> 01:59:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Could he appoint and remove.

1997
01:59:16.680 --> 01:59:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Bishops he's not supposed to. He probably was involved in

1998
01:59:25.439 --> 01:59:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, those kinds of ceremonies or whatever. The emperor

1999
01:59:31.000 --> 01:59:33.479
<v Speaker 1>can go behind the Kona stasis, so he's almost given

2000
01:59:33.520 --> 01:59:37.399
<v Speaker 1>a quasi deaconant role because Paul describes the emperor as

2001
01:59:37.680 --> 01:59:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a diaconos of God. But anytime the emperors tried to

2002
01:59:42.720 --> 01:59:45.000
<v Speaker 1>do this, this was seen as a violation. I mean,

2003
01:59:45.000 --> 01:59:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you have many heretical, heretic emperors who tried to do

2004
01:59:47.840 --> 01:59:50.039
<v Speaker 1>this and tried to run the church and it never worked.

2005
01:59:50.760 --> 01:59:55.000
<v Speaker 1>So but no, I don't think the emperors like took

2006
01:59:55.039 --> 01:59:58.039
<v Speaker 1>over the church. If they ran the church and subverted it,

2007
01:59:58.520 --> 02:00:02.039
<v Speaker 1>then we wouldn't have wor the doxy right, the heretic

2008
02:00:02.119 --> 02:00:05.039
<v Speaker 1>emperors would have been condemned. But none of the heretic

2009
02:00:05.079 --> 02:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>emperors ever ended up victorious.

2010
02:00:09.439 --> 02:00:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we got a little bit.

2011
02:00:10.560 --> 02:00:13.600
<v Speaker 6>Pointed popes and stuff sometimes as well.

2012
02:00:16.000 --> 02:00:18.119
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's a good point in the in the in

2013
02:00:18.199 --> 02:00:24.359
<v Speaker 1>the West, its same problems, right, I mean the papacy,

2014
02:00:24.439 --> 02:00:26.199
<v Speaker 1>as we just did that stream with snack, I mean,

2015
02:00:26.239 --> 02:00:30.119
<v Speaker 1>the papacy becomes a tool of the Franks, and that's

2016
02:00:30.199 --> 02:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>not even in question in terms of history.

2017
02:00:37.039 --> 02:00:39.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay, next question is this is a really weird one.

2018
02:00:40.119 --> 02:00:42.319
<v Speaker 4>I just feel like banning the guy for asking it.

2019
02:00:42.439 --> 02:00:47.239
<v Speaker 4>But what's the rationale behind the church prohibiting first cousin marriages?

2020
02:00:47.520 --> 02:00:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Is?

2021
02:00:48.119 --> 02:00:51.079
<v Speaker 4>Uh, it's practiced throughout the world, and it's not prohibited

2022
02:00:51.119 --> 02:00:54.720
<v Speaker 4>in the Old Testament. Also, the genetic defects that result

2023
02:00:54.800 --> 02:00:57.880
<v Speaker 4>from it are exaggerated. Yeah, okay, but I don't want

2024
02:00:57.920 --> 02:01:02.039
<v Speaker 4>to marry my cousin. I'm just curious, okay, don't I

2025
02:01:02.079 --> 02:01:02.399
<v Speaker 4>don't know.

2026
02:01:02.840 --> 02:01:03.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, for.

2027
02:01:05.720 --> 02:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>A friend, why can't I marry my president? I don't know.

2028
02:01:08.119 --> 02:01:10.279
<v Speaker 13>You look at the you look at the Arab world,

2029
02:01:10.359 --> 02:01:13.119
<v Speaker 13>and then you say that the genetic defects is exaggerated.

2030
02:01:13.840 --> 02:01:14.920
<v Speaker 13>Is not exaggerated?

2031
02:01:17.279 --> 02:01:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Bounty US five dollars? Couldn't a god of another faith

2032
02:01:22.640 --> 02:01:26.119
<v Speaker 1>system have revealed himself to be similar in an essence.

2033
02:01:28.600 --> 02:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>In counter argument to TAG, no, because the TAG argument

2034
02:01:32.760 --> 02:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>is not just a rational argument for for our view

2035
02:01:35.800 --> 02:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>or an abstract argument. It's the TAG argument is the

2036
02:01:39.000 --> 02:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>entire Christian paradigm. That's the point. That's the strength of

2037
02:01:42.000 --> 02:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>TAG is that we're not arguing for a little piecemeal thing.

2038
02:01:45.039 --> 02:01:48.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we might have to argue on the basis

2039
02:01:48.520 --> 02:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of one area of the worldview at a time, just

2040
02:01:50.880 --> 02:01:54.159
<v Speaker 1>because of the limitations of of us as humans, we

2041
02:01:54.199 --> 02:01:56.399
<v Speaker 1>can only talk about one thing at a time. But

2042
02:01:56.560 --> 02:01:59.279
<v Speaker 1>the argument, the TAG argument isn't just an argument for God.

2043
02:01:59.279 --> 02:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>If I'm arguing for the triune God, then I'm also

2044
02:02:01.960 --> 02:02:05.239
<v Speaker 1>arguing for that whole paradigm, the God. Who didn't the

2045
02:02:05.279 --> 02:02:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Triune God create the world? Didn't he have providence? Doesn't

2046
02:02:09.159 --> 02:02:12.079
<v Speaker 1>he have you know, an incarnation, etcetera, etcetera. So it's

2047
02:02:12.279 --> 02:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>an argument for the whole paradigm, not just for an

2048
02:02:14.800 --> 02:02:21.319
<v Speaker 1>abstraction of logical argumentations or mental structures or something like this.

2049
02:02:21.840 --> 02:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>So even if I start arguing on the basis of

2050
02:02:24.560 --> 02:02:28.279
<v Speaker 1>logic or the metaphysical status of logical entities or whatever,

2051
02:02:29.039 --> 02:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just picking that as a place to argue the

2052
02:02:32.079 --> 02:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>entire paradigm. That's the point here. I'm not saying it's

2053
02:02:35.800 --> 02:02:39.199
<v Speaker 1>true because I'm arguing for an entire paradigm. I'm saying

2054
02:02:39.239 --> 02:02:42.199
<v Speaker 1>that that is the argument. The argument isn't just for

2055
02:02:42.680 --> 02:02:46.479
<v Speaker 1>the Trinity, it's for the entire paradigm. You see. That's

2056
02:02:46.520 --> 02:02:51.399
<v Speaker 1>why the argument is unique, because I can't argue piecemeal

2057
02:02:51.479 --> 02:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and be consistent if I can't just argue for the

2058
02:02:53.680 --> 02:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Trinity without the rest of the of the revelation of

2059
02:02:55.760 --> 02:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the Trinity. Right, the revelation is holistic. It's not just

2060
02:02:59.600 --> 02:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the trend, it's all the other dogmas they go along

2061
02:03:02.039 --> 02:03:04.239
<v Speaker 1>with the Trinity. It's a whole system that I'm arguing for.

2062
02:03:04.399 --> 02:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>That's the point. So, no, you can't come up with

2063
02:03:07.880 --> 02:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a ripoff version that's like the two god system or

2064
02:03:11.560 --> 02:03:15.439
<v Speaker 1>the four gods system. That's all the things in your system,

2065
02:03:15.520 --> 02:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>but mine's for gods. Well, dude, that's actually just a ripoff,

2066
02:03:19.000 --> 02:03:23.239
<v Speaker 1>and our argument is not divorced from history. Our argument

2067
02:03:23.319 --> 02:03:28.279
<v Speaker 1>includes a God incarnate that's not going to be what

2068
02:03:28.399 --> 02:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you argue for. Like, I mean, would you argue, did

2069
02:03:31.079 --> 02:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>did the four person God become incarnate? Really?

2070
02:03:34.800 --> 02:03:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

2071
02:03:35.000 --> 02:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, guess what, dude, that's from us, like you're ripping

2072
02:03:37.920 --> 02:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>off us, right, you see what I'm saying. I mean,

2073
02:03:39.960 --> 02:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>our whole system is already a two thousand year old

2074
02:03:43.640 --> 02:03:47.479
<v Speaker 1>into history system based on four thousand year prior to

2075
02:03:47.640 --> 02:03:51.159
<v Speaker 1>that Old Testament revelation. It's an entire system that we're

2076
02:03:51.239 --> 02:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>arguing for the whole thing, including history, including the Church,

2077
02:03:55.760 --> 02:04:00.319
<v Speaker 1>including the incarnation. It's all part of the argument. So no,

2078
02:04:00.600 --> 02:04:05.479
<v Speaker 1>you can't consistently just say, well, I have a you know,

2079
02:04:05.600 --> 02:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>trinity in my head that I've come up with that

2080
02:04:08.800 --> 02:04:12.239
<v Speaker 1>solves all the epistemic dilemmas of your trinity system, and

2081
02:04:12.239 --> 02:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>therefore why can't I just post mine? Because my argument

2082
02:04:15.680 --> 02:04:19.399
<v Speaker 1>is the entire Christian paradigm, all of it, ten Commandments,

2083
02:04:19.920 --> 02:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Jesus in history, all that stuff.

2084
02:04:24.399 --> 02:04:30.079
<v Speaker 4>Okay, next question, Uh, I was wondering if Jay can

2085
02:04:30.119 --> 02:04:31.960
<v Speaker 4>give a short elaboration.

2086
02:04:31.680 --> 02:04:41.039
<v Speaker 2>Of theosis difnation. Uh. Yeah, How it differs from Mormon view?

2087
02:04:42.880 --> 02:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, so, our our view is not that you become

2088
02:04:45.760 --> 02:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a God of your own planet.

2089
02:04:47.119 --> 02:04:47.239
<v Speaker 2>Right.

2090
02:04:47.399 --> 02:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Our view is not that God the Father impregnated but Mary.

2091
02:04:55.319 --> 02:04:58.479
<v Speaker 1>We don't bear any similarity to the Mormon view. Our

2092
02:04:58.600 --> 02:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>view is what the Church always taught, which is not

2093
02:05:01.600 --> 02:05:05.079
<v Speaker 1>the Mormon view. Obviously, it's a participation in the uncreated

2094
02:05:05.239 --> 02:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>energies of God, which is not what Mormons teach. We

2095
02:05:07.720 --> 02:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>don't teach that the triad is a literal Father with

2096
02:05:11.479 --> 02:05:14.439
<v Speaker 1>a body who impregnated Mary. All this goofy crazy that

2097
02:05:14.560 --> 02:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't teach that, dude. Come on, So there's absolutely

2098
02:05:17.640 --> 02:05:20.119
<v Speaker 1>no similarity to the Mormon view, because the Mormon view

2099
02:05:20.279 --> 02:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is like a space opera, you know, like you're going

2100
02:05:23.920 --> 02:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to be God of your own planet and have celestial

2101
02:05:27.119 --> 02:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>sex and space babies and that. What are you talking about, dude,

2102
02:05:30.760 --> 02:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that's what That's not what we're talking about.

2103
02:05:37.159 --> 02:05:37.479
<v Speaker 5>Okay.

2104
02:05:37.880 --> 02:05:42.640
<v Speaker 4>Next one is when God cursed the serpent to eat

2105
02:05:43.000 --> 02:05:44.479
<v Speaker 4>dust all the days of your life.

2106
02:05:44.880 --> 02:05:48.199
<v Speaker 2>But that had been a reference back to Adam being

2107
02:05:48.359 --> 02:05:50.199
<v Speaker 2>formed from and returning to dust.

2108
02:05:50.439 --> 02:05:52.560
<v Speaker 4>Was God telling the serpent that it would feed on

2109
02:05:52.680 --> 02:05:54.319
<v Speaker 4>dead matter and thus death itself?

2110
02:05:57.760 --> 02:06:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I don't think that Satan or the

2111
02:06:00.560 --> 02:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>serpent literally feeds on dead matter. But there is a

2112
02:06:03.600 --> 02:06:06.399
<v Speaker 1>connection between the dust of the earth and the curse

2113
02:06:07.039 --> 02:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>pretty consistently throughout scripture. Absolutely, just like thorns and briars

2114
02:06:11.239 --> 02:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and thistles will come up. That's an image that's used

2115
02:06:15.000 --> 02:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>throughout the Old Testament of the curse of the Fall.

2116
02:06:18.000 --> 02:06:22.359
<v Speaker 1>So yes, in a certain symbolic sense, but not like

2117
02:06:23.079 --> 02:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>snakes are literally eating dead things or something like that.

2118
02:06:28.520 --> 02:06:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, next question is this is from someone seeking advice.

2119
02:06:33.119 --> 02:06:35.720
<v Speaker 4>He says, how should I deal with the fact that

2120
02:06:36.000 --> 02:06:39.800
<v Speaker 4>most of the priests in my area are gambling, drunkard

2121
02:06:39.960 --> 02:06:45.279
<v Speaker 4>di divorces, gallivanting with women of the nine.

2122
02:06:47.119 --> 02:06:48.760
<v Speaker 2>So the christ I guess is, how do you deal

2123
02:06:48.800 --> 02:06:51.479
<v Speaker 2>with the fact that you have bad priests in your area?

2124
02:06:52.199 --> 02:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Well, first of all, I mean I'm not convinced

2125
02:06:54.079 --> 02:06:57.199
<v Speaker 1>that gambling itself is inherently always wrong. There's a little

2126
02:06:57.399 --> 02:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>this is ambiguous territory. I mean, if if I have

2127
02:07:00.680 --> 02:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a business venture and I take out a loan or

2128
02:07:02.840 --> 02:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever to I mean, that's a gamble. So I mean,

2129
02:07:05.840 --> 02:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>at what point exactly gambling is this is you know,

2130
02:07:08.760 --> 02:07:12.239
<v Speaker 1>we're not Puritan Protestants here with this kind of stuff,

2131
02:07:12.279 --> 02:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, there there's really no church that's immune

2132
02:07:19.079 --> 02:07:23.119
<v Speaker 1>to corrupt leadership, right, that's in Protestants, that's in Roman Catholics,

2133
02:07:23.199 --> 02:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>it's Orthodox. I mean, this is this is just a

2134
02:07:27.039 --> 02:07:30.199
<v Speaker 1>problem of the human domain. So I don't have any

2135
02:07:30.239 --> 02:07:32.159
<v Speaker 1>easy answer as to what you can do other than

2136
02:07:32.520 --> 02:07:35.319
<v Speaker 1>to try to find the best that you can that's

2137
02:07:35.439 --> 02:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>not corrupt. I mean, can you go to a different

2138
02:07:38.840 --> 02:07:41.439
<v Speaker 1>city that's nearby if it's a little bit longer. I mean,

2139
02:07:41.479 --> 02:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I've had to drive one two three hours before to

2140
02:07:44.600 --> 02:07:46.159
<v Speaker 1>go to church. And if you if you've got a

2141
02:07:46.199 --> 02:07:48.119
<v Speaker 1>long drive and it's you can't do it every Sunday,

2142
02:07:48.159 --> 02:07:50.439
<v Speaker 1>then plan you know, like once a month to do

2143
02:07:51.119 --> 02:07:53.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, your one month trip to the church that's

2144
02:07:53.479 --> 02:07:55.279
<v Speaker 1>two hours away or whatever. I had to do that

2145
02:07:55.399 --> 02:07:58.159
<v Speaker 1>for a long time before I had something closer to me.

2146
02:07:58.359 --> 02:08:02.239
<v Speaker 1>So it's just, you know, I don't have any easy

2147
02:08:02.279 --> 02:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>answer for that kind of stuff, but it is unfortunate.

2148
02:08:04.840 --> 02:08:07.479
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of corrupt clergy out there, no

2149
02:08:07.560 --> 02:08:08.039
<v Speaker 1>doubt about that.

2150
02:08:11.399 --> 02:08:16.279
<v Speaker 4>Next question is, if the Creator is separate from this

2151
02:08:16.479 --> 02:08:22.039
<v Speaker 4>cosmos in a manner opposed to pantheism and panentheism, wouldn't

2152
02:08:22.079 --> 02:08:27.640
<v Speaker 4>the totality comprised of Creator us his creation be more

2153
02:08:27.800 --> 02:08:32.119
<v Speaker 4>encompassing than the Creator by himself, such that the aggregate

2154
02:08:32.560 --> 02:08:36.560
<v Speaker 4>of Creator and creation then comprise a greater entity than

2155
02:08:36.640 --> 02:08:37.960
<v Speaker 4>the Creator by himself.

2156
02:08:38.239 --> 02:08:42.319
<v Speaker 2>And wouldn't this mean that the aggregate slash totality.

2157
02:08:41.760 --> 02:08:46.560
<v Speaker 4>Would then better fit the characteristics of the absolute or God.

2158
02:08:47.399 --> 02:08:49.239
<v Speaker 2>Then would the creator alone.

2159
02:08:49.720 --> 02:08:52.600
<v Speaker 4>I have heard in places that Orthodoxy is panentheistic, but

2160
02:08:52.640 --> 02:08:54.319
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure if most orthodox.

2161
02:08:54.399 --> 02:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Would confirm, Well, this is equivocation on the notion of

2162
02:08:58.680 --> 02:09:02.439
<v Speaker 1>what is greater or not greater? I mean, on what

2163
02:09:02.600 --> 02:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>basis are you saying that because there is God and creation,

2164
02:09:06.199 --> 02:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that's somehow greater. Now we would say, with Dionysius in

2165
02:09:09.680 --> 02:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the Divine Names, that the fact that God creates he

2166
02:09:12.920 --> 02:09:17.039
<v Speaker 1>did intend to create to express and to share his goodness.

2167
02:09:17.760 --> 02:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to share himself and his goodness with creatures.

2168
02:09:21.199 --> 02:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So that is in a sense greater. But that doesn't

2169
02:09:24.680 --> 02:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>mean that it adds greater to God himself, right, because

2170
02:09:27.640 --> 02:09:31.439
<v Speaker 1>God did not lack anything. And Maximus himself deals with

2171
02:09:31.560 --> 02:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>this question many places in the ambiguity where it comes

2172
02:09:34.640 --> 02:09:39.039
<v Speaker 1>up with Well, if you read Toolos and his dissertation

2173
02:09:39.199 --> 02:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>on Maximus covers this question about well, why did God

2174
02:09:42.880 --> 02:09:46.279
<v Speaker 1>choose to create? And Maximus says, we can't say other

2175
02:09:46.399 --> 02:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>than out of his own goodness. But his goodness doesn't

2176
02:09:49.000 --> 02:09:52.439
<v Speaker 1>add to being like like, oh, God lacked, he was

2177
02:09:52.520 --> 02:09:55.119
<v Speaker 1>lonely or something like that, and so he created because

2178
02:09:55.119 --> 02:09:56.359
<v Speaker 1>he was lonely and needed more.

2179
02:09:56.439 --> 02:09:56.560
<v Speaker 3>You know.

2180
02:09:56.920 --> 02:10:01.039
<v Speaker 1>No, it's just out of pure, overflowing goodness and love,

2181
02:10:01.439 --> 02:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>is what Maximus says. So, uh, no, it doesn't add

2182
02:10:04.880 --> 02:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to his being. And there's no there's no, there's no

2183
02:10:09.079 --> 02:10:12.279
<v Speaker 1>aggregate goodness that like trumps the goodness that God has,

2184
02:10:12.439 --> 02:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>because the goodness that creation possesses is a participatory goodness

2185
02:10:17.399 --> 02:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that God has. And by the way, panentheism is kind

2186
02:10:23.840 --> 02:10:26.359
<v Speaker 1>of orthodox, so I'm confused as to what what what

2187
02:10:26.520 --> 02:10:29.079
<v Speaker 1>that person is talking about. We don't believe in pantheism,

2188
02:10:29.119 --> 02:10:31.239
<v Speaker 1>but we do believe that God permeates the creative order.

2189
02:10:31.319 --> 02:10:37.640
<v Speaker 4>Sure, okay, cool, it seems as if we actually got

2190
02:10:37.720 --> 02:10:38.520
<v Speaker 4>through the questions.

2191
02:10:39.239 --> 02:10:42.039
<v Speaker 1>Also cool, Well, we've been going for two hours, so

2192
02:10:42.119 --> 02:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>let me see if there's any more of the super

2193
02:10:43.520 --> 02:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>check questions. Uh, there's a.

2194
02:10:45.600 --> 02:10:48.479
<v Speaker 2>Couple here that says we also got another one.

2195
02:10:48.600 --> 02:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, now there's a few here. Let's let me go

2196
02:10:53.960 --> 02:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>back to where I missed a bunch of these. Well,

2197
02:11:00.119 --> 02:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a whole much Kung Powell for ten dollars? Why was

2198
02:11:07.960 --> 02:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the virgin Mary necessary? Could God create recreate without her? Sure?

2199
02:11:13.319 --> 02:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>But God always chooses to use and have humans participate

2200
02:11:18.920 --> 02:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>with him in redemption. God just wanted to do it

2201
02:11:23.520 --> 02:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>that way because again, like I said before, creation occurred

2202
02:11:26.479 --> 02:11:29.199
<v Speaker 1>out of the goodness of God, not because God needed

2203
02:11:29.840 --> 02:11:32.199
<v Speaker 1>or had lack. I mean, this is precisely one of

2204
02:11:32.199 --> 02:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why we don't have a bare, strict monotheism

2205
02:11:35.560 --> 02:11:41.199
<v Speaker 1>of a self existent person from all eternity. God always

2206
02:11:41.359 --> 02:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>had a over ever flowing, overflowing love from the Father

2207
02:11:46.239 --> 02:11:49.159
<v Speaker 1>to the Son and in the Spirit. So there is

2208
02:11:49.319 --> 02:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that triadic love and communion from all eternity. And so

2209
02:11:54.680 --> 02:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>God didn't create the world as a reflection of himself

2210
02:11:58.079 --> 02:12:01.039
<v Speaker 1>because he was lonely or because he needed some way

2211
02:12:01.079 --> 02:12:04.359
<v Speaker 1>to be Lord. He was always Lord right, the Father

2212
02:12:04.680 --> 02:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>was always Lord, He was always the cause in Arka,

2213
02:12:07.920 --> 02:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and always had the Son. So there was always that

2214
02:12:10.880 --> 02:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>perfect triadic relationship in the creation of the world. Therefore,

2215
02:12:14.800 --> 02:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>is not out of necessity. It's not an emanation. It's

2216
02:12:17.680 --> 02:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>not a determined thing on the basis of eternal forms

2217
02:12:21.760 --> 02:12:24.039
<v Speaker 1>in the essence of God or Platonism or anything like that.

2218
02:12:24.560 --> 02:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>It's purely out of goodwill. This is what makes Christianity

2219
02:12:27.880 --> 02:12:32.439
<v Speaker 1>unique is that the creative world is a willful expression

2220
02:12:32.600 --> 02:12:36.039
<v Speaker 1>of God's love and goodness in being and not any

2221
02:12:36.119 --> 02:12:40.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of necessary emanation or determined process. That's the chief

2222
02:12:40.239 --> 02:12:44.359
<v Speaker 1>argument that Maximus makes against Origin and Plotinus and all

2223
02:12:44.399 --> 02:12:48.279
<v Speaker 1>these weirdos and creeps is that, no, it's not a

2224
02:12:48.439 --> 02:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>necessary emanation or creation, is not an eternal generation from

2225
02:12:52.960 --> 02:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>God or anything like that like the Platonist thought. So

2226
02:12:57.239 --> 02:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that's what makes it unique. And therefore when we read

2227
02:13:01.680 --> 02:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Genesis and we see that Mary, when we see that

2228
02:13:04.960 --> 02:13:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Eve is the mother of all, right, now we start

2229
02:13:07.359 --> 02:13:10.159
<v Speaker 1>to see how Mary is the new Eve. You see,

2230
02:13:10.359 --> 02:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a common comparison. Mary is the ark of the covenant.

2231
02:13:13.880 --> 02:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Mary is the answer to the destruction that Eve brought.

2232
02:13:18.159 --> 02:13:22.359
<v Speaker 1>So that's why Mary was necessary in a secondary sense,

2233
02:13:22.479 --> 02:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>not that God needed her, but that He chose and

2234
02:13:25.800 --> 02:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>willed to have humans or someone like Mary be necessary

2235
02:13:30.640 --> 02:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in the economy of salvation. So that's the answer to

2236
02:13:34.800 --> 02:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that question. But thank you for that, Kung Paw Bounteous.

2237
02:13:39.319 --> 02:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead.

2238
02:13:40.640 --> 02:13:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

2239
02:13:41.840 --> 02:13:44.880
<v Speaker 6>I think a lot of people sometimes, especially Muslim critics,

2240
02:13:45.000 --> 02:13:51.720
<v Speaker 6>forget the whole concept of like divine drama and stuff

2241
02:13:51.800 --> 02:13:55.560
<v Speaker 6>like that, Like how do you talk about and Athanasius

2242
02:13:55.560 --> 02:13:57.560
<v Speaker 6>talks about how the crucifixion.

2243
02:13:56.960 --> 02:13:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Had to be a particularly kind of violent and kind

2244
02:13:59.720 --> 02:14:01.960
<v Speaker 2>of obvious.

2245
02:14:01.680 --> 02:14:04.319
<v Speaker 6>Things so that people would know about it and the

2246
02:14:04.439 --> 02:14:08.079
<v Speaker 6>economy and you know, like the divine counsel and stuff

2247
02:14:08.159 --> 02:14:11.520
<v Speaker 6>like that. Like God doesn't need to consult with his

2248
02:14:12.039 --> 02:14:15.960
<v Speaker 6>divine counsel to make decisions, but he does. And it's

2249
02:14:16.399 --> 02:14:20.199
<v Speaker 6>like a divine a divine fittingness to all these things,

2250
02:14:20.279 --> 02:14:23.760
<v Speaker 6>to this order because it's pedagogical as well for us,

2251
02:14:24.640 --> 02:14:25.680
<v Speaker 6>it teaches us things.

2252
02:14:26.359 --> 02:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, God didn't need Abraham to intercede for Sodom.

2253
02:14:31.000 --> 02:14:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Orrybody knew that he would, and he chose to operate

2254
02:14:33.520 --> 02:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>through Yeah, creaturely co operators. As paulses, we are God's

2255
02:14:38.880 --> 02:14:42.199
<v Speaker 1>co workers. God didn't need Amos to intercede, but he

2256
02:14:42.439 --> 02:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>wanted Amos to intercede.

2257
02:14:44.840 --> 02:14:46.239
<v Speaker 2>Ythan says, well, that too.

2258
02:14:46.359 --> 02:14:49.560
<v Speaker 6>He's like God didn't need like he didn't need Moses

2259
02:14:49.640 --> 02:14:52.640
<v Speaker 6>to raise his staff to split the sea or anything. Like,

2260
02:14:52.720 --> 02:14:57.399
<v Speaker 6>he didn't need all these human specific human involvements.

2261
02:14:56.880 --> 02:14:58.920
<v Speaker 2>To a lot of the things he does well.

2262
02:14:58.960 --> 02:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>The incarnation is thus a affirmation of the goodness of

2263
02:15:02.720 --> 02:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>creation and God's will to use the created order, because

2264
02:15:06.039 --> 02:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it was always his intent to become incarnate and always

2265
02:15:08.840 --> 02:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>his intent to use the created order. That's key. Creation

2266
02:15:11.920 --> 02:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>itself presupposes incarnation. That's what's unique to orthodoxy. Let's see

2267
02:15:18.079 --> 02:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Bounteous for five dollars, could God create? Wait, Noah, that's

2268
02:15:22.680 --> 02:15:25.399
<v Speaker 1>the one I already answered, peak brain capacity a dollar.

2269
02:15:25.520 --> 02:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>If the world we are living in is not operating

2270
02:15:29.720 --> 02:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the same way as described in Genesis because of the fault,

2271
02:15:32.079 --> 02:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>then evolutionary theory could be regarded as balanced science on

2272
02:15:36.119 --> 02:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the basis of pure empirical evidence. Well, they're necess saying

2273
02:15:38.720 --> 02:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it is pure empirical science or evidence. All data is

2274
02:15:42.800 --> 02:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>theory laden, All empirical experience is theory laden. Go listen

2275
02:15:46.760 --> 02:15:49.079
<v Speaker 1>to this stef On volume debate. I outline the four

2276
02:15:49.119 --> 02:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>problems of basic empiricism that nobody in an empiricist tradition

2277
02:15:52.920 --> 02:15:57.119
<v Speaker 1>can answer. Their basic well known classical problems of raw

2278
02:15:57.439 --> 02:16:01.199
<v Speaker 1>not eve empiricism that have been asked for centuries now

2279
02:16:01.239 --> 02:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>ever since David Hume Willard sellers up in the present day,

2280
02:16:06.199 --> 02:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>William ben Orman Kwine, those are the basic problems that

2281
02:16:08.960 --> 02:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>empiricism can't answer. So you're wrong about the idea that

2282
02:16:12.039 --> 02:16:15.319
<v Speaker 1>there is such a thing as a pure empirical data

2283
02:16:15.399 --> 02:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>or science or whatever. I can't see the rest of

2284
02:16:16.880 --> 02:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>your question, but that looks like where you're going. And

2285
02:16:19.760 --> 02:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>if you mean by evolution adaptation, nobody denies that species

2286
02:16:23.680 --> 02:16:26.479
<v Speaker 1>adapt But if you mean by evolution this grand theory

2287
02:16:27.079 --> 02:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of death being natural and AONs of time to produce

2288
02:16:31.119 --> 02:16:33.559
<v Speaker 1>Adam and Eve out of Kate, Geico, Caveman or some

2289
02:16:33.639 --> 02:16:41.239
<v Speaker 1>of this nonsense, then no, be chez wait searching one dollar. Okay,

2290
02:16:41.360 --> 02:16:44.319
<v Speaker 1>I read the scripture, but I can't overcome my skepticism.

2291
02:16:44.440 --> 02:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Well that was pretty quick too. That was like an

2292
02:16:45.879 --> 02:16:48.559
<v Speaker 1>hour ago. So you you read the Bible in an

2293
02:16:48.600 --> 02:16:52.559
<v Speaker 1>hour again, So it could be just a book. Well,

2294
02:16:53.000 --> 02:16:56.319
<v Speaker 1>how can just the book predict the birth of Christ?

2295
02:16:56.440 --> 02:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>How can just the book predict all of these messianics

2296
02:16:59.479 --> 02:17:04.399
<v Speaker 1>specific that one guy comes and fulfills. How is that

2297
02:17:04.760 --> 02:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>just the book? When you pray, does God speak to you? No,

2298
02:17:09.879 --> 02:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it's again, it's not audible voices.

2299
02:17:11.760 --> 02:17:11.879
<v Speaker 2>Right.

2300
02:17:12.000 --> 02:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>So Jesus answers this very question by saying, go to

2301
02:17:15.000 --> 02:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the scriptures and study them, and you will see that

2302
02:17:18.040 --> 02:17:20.319
<v Speaker 1>they have all kinds of things that show them to

2303
02:17:20.440 --> 02:17:25.399
<v Speaker 1>be miraculous. Right, they predict the coming of them Assiah.

2304
02:17:25.440 --> 02:17:28.559
<v Speaker 1>Look up the messianic prophecies start there, and then you'll

2305
02:17:28.600 --> 02:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>start to see that the book itself is of divine inspiration.

2306
02:17:31.559 --> 02:17:36.479
<v Speaker 1>That's the visible proof argument that Jesus uses. Right, he

2307
02:17:36.600 --> 02:17:40.479
<v Speaker 1>has no problem just saying, look, if people rise from

2308
02:17:40.520 --> 02:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the dead, that's not going to convince somebody. If they're

2309
02:17:42.799 --> 02:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to be convinced by the predictions of the

2310
02:17:45.360 --> 02:17:47.079
<v Speaker 1>law and the prophets, they're not going to be convinced

2311
02:17:47.079 --> 02:17:51.479
<v Speaker 1>by anything. So what I'm saying is, go and look

2312
02:17:51.520 --> 02:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>at the Messianic prophecies. I mean you responded by saying, oh, okay,

2313
02:17:54.440 --> 02:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I went and read scriptures, but I don't see it.

2314
02:17:56.879 --> 02:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you even know what you're reading? That's what I'm saying, Like,

2315
02:17:58.879 --> 02:18:01.319
<v Speaker 1>you have to understand what you're reading, right, I'm not

2316
02:18:01.440 --> 02:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>saying just look at this verse, like, read the thing

2317
02:18:04.079 --> 02:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and understand that there are prophecies of when the Messiah

2318
02:18:07.879 --> 02:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>will come, what he will do. Right, the Book of

2319
02:18:10.200 --> 02:18:20.079
<v Speaker 1>Isaiah start there, So man light is right, Lucius for

2320
02:18:20.159 --> 02:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>three dollars, what is the Orthodox position on why people

2321
02:18:26.639 --> 02:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>are born with incapacitating illnesses? Well, because of the fall.

2322
02:18:30.440 --> 02:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean all illnesses, all death, all decay, all of

2323
02:18:34.079 --> 02:18:38.399
<v Speaker 1>that comes as a result of Adam's fall. I don't

2324
02:18:38.440 --> 02:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>know how how else to answer that. That's just another

2325
02:18:41.000 --> 02:18:44.319
<v Speaker 1>problem of evil question, but thank you for that. Lucius

2326
02:18:44.440 --> 02:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Militaris three fifty three. What is the Seraph and Rose

2327
02:18:47.440 --> 02:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>book on Genesis and Creation? Genesis Creation Early Man? And

2328
02:18:51.360 --> 02:18:54.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry it does appear to be out of print.

2329
02:18:54.719 --> 02:18:57.479
<v Speaker 1>I was looking the other day at a lot of

2330
02:18:57.559 --> 02:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>different places and sites as to where it might be

2331
02:18:59.680 --> 02:19:03.479
<v Speaker 1>perfect just and I couldn't find any. So I'm sorry

2332
02:19:03.600 --> 02:19:08.479
<v Speaker 1>to say that that book appears to be gone. I

2333
02:19:08.600 --> 02:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>mean not gone, but I don't I mean you can't

2334
02:19:13.040 --> 02:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>get it for like under nine hundred dollars. Every place

2335
02:19:16.280 --> 02:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>has that book for sale for nine There may be

2336
02:19:18.239 --> 02:19:22.559
<v Speaker 1>a PDF floating round, but physical copies apparently are sparse

2337
02:19:22.600 --> 02:19:25.639
<v Speaker 1>because it's out of print. But maybe if you drove

2338
02:19:25.760 --> 02:19:28.159
<v Speaker 1>to a monastery or a bookstore somewhere, you can find it.

2339
02:19:30.239 --> 02:19:30.559
<v Speaker 2>About you.

2340
02:19:30.760 --> 02:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, this Creation early means.

2341
02:19:34.479 --> 02:19:35.719
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I think he's talking about.

2342
02:19:38.319 --> 02:19:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Anyway, So I am going to continue this talk.

2343
02:19:42.159 --> 02:19:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll close up the Q and A. I'm

2344
02:19:44.120 --> 02:19:47.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep going because I did say I would do this,

2345
02:19:47.879 --> 02:19:53.479
<v Speaker 1>and it is time to finally dude the Pelicon book.

2346
02:19:53.959 --> 02:19:56.239
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not going to end the stream. I think

2347
02:19:56.280 --> 02:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>we'll close up the Q and A part and then

2348
02:19:59.200 --> 02:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>if anybody wants to continue with me here on YouTube,

2349
02:20:02.040 --> 02:20:05.239
<v Speaker 1>I'll just continue doing this stream. But I'm not going

2350
02:20:05.280 --> 02:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to keep doing the Q and A part. I want

2351
02:20:07.079 --> 02:20:11.879
<v Speaker 1>to get into early church the development of the Patristic

2352
02:20:11.959 --> 02:20:15.799
<v Speaker 1>tradition from Pelicon's book, because I did say months ago

2353
02:20:15.799 --> 02:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I would do.

2354
02:20:16.280 --> 02:20:17.280
<v Speaker 13>This, and.

2355
02:20:18.799 --> 02:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Church of Eternal Logos tonight will do our part two

2356
02:20:22.159 --> 02:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>in the next few days. Jamie and I will do

2357
02:20:23.840 --> 02:20:26.440
<v Speaker 1>our part two in the next few days. And thank

2358
02:20:26.479 --> 02:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you to all you guys on the discord for chipping in,

2359
02:20:29.639 --> 02:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>and I'll put everybody's links and whatnot.

2360
02:20:32.479 --> 02:20:34.680
<v Speaker 13>J before you cut off, If if I could ask,

2361
02:20:35.280 --> 02:20:37.520
<v Speaker 13>did you want to maybe make an announcement with regards

2362
02:20:37.559 --> 02:20:40.920
<v Speaker 13>to what is Seminin's Metropolitan Joonna has.

2363
02:20:40.879 --> 02:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Planned for the server, Uh, sure, if you want, If

2364
02:20:44.600 --> 02:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>you want to go ahead and announce it, go ahead.

2365
02:20:46.760 --> 02:20:47.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I can just announce this.

2366
02:20:47.719 --> 02:20:52.200
<v Speaker 13>So we're waiting on some more information hopefully forthcoming next

2367
02:20:52.280 --> 02:20:57.040
<v Speaker 13>week sometime, but his eminence, Metropolitan Joonah has offered to

2368
02:20:57.200 --> 02:21:01.399
<v Speaker 13>start up a weekly ctaschtical lecture your series right here

2369
02:21:01.559 --> 02:21:05.120
<v Speaker 13>on Jay's discord, so stay tuned for that. We'll make

2370
02:21:05.239 --> 02:21:10.120
<v Speaker 13>some more prominent announcements as we get more information, but

2371
02:21:10.200 --> 02:21:13.000
<v Speaker 13>hopefully next week we'll we'll have a set time and

2372
02:21:13.079 --> 02:21:14.559
<v Speaker 13>date when all this stuff is going to happen.

2373
02:21:16.120 --> 02:21:19.559
<v Speaker 4>And they're reminded to everyone watching the stream, if you want,

2374
02:21:19.920 --> 02:21:21.399
<v Speaker 4>please do come to the discord.

2375
02:21:21.520 --> 02:21:24.680
<v Speaker 2>I'll break you personally myself. We'll ask all your dumb questions.

2376
02:21:25.040 --> 02:21:26.879
<v Speaker 2>Blah blah blah blah. Love all of you.

2377
02:21:27.600 --> 02:21:30.079
<v Speaker 4>Jay, make sure to put my Twitter down there because

2378
02:21:30.079 --> 02:21:31.280
<v Speaker 4>I won that Internet cloud.

2379
02:21:31.520 --> 02:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, I know I will do that for all

2380
02:21:33.079 --> 02:21:33.239
<v Speaker 1>of you.

2381
02:21:34.000 --> 02:21:37.879
<v Speaker 6>By the way, hop over to Sam Shimunt Shimonian's channel.

2382
02:21:38.040 --> 02:21:41.559
<v Speaker 6>He did an interview with Craig on the Orthodox view

2383
02:21:41.559 --> 02:21:43.639
<v Speaker 6>of Salvation and I listened to as much of it

2384
02:21:43.680 --> 02:21:46.280
<v Speaker 6>as I could and it's actually really, really, really good.

2385
02:21:46.440 --> 02:21:50.520
<v Speaker 3>So go and watch it after Jay's finished.

2386
02:21:51.159 --> 02:21:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, yeah, after guys, am I going to be

2387
02:21:54.200 --> 02:21:57.799
<v Speaker 1>cutting into a lot of people's streams. Is Cotel doing one?

2388
02:21:57.879 --> 02:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, It's okay. I mean everybody can eventually

2389
02:22:00.600 --> 02:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>watched come back and wash. Yeah, yeah, it's not a

2390
02:22:03.200 --> 02:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>big deal. How many of people watching live. But I

2391
02:22:05.360 --> 02:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>am going to cover because I've got so many notes

2392
02:22:07.479 --> 02:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>on on Pelican, I took hundreds of pages of notes,

2393
02:22:12.200 --> 02:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and I also have hundreds of pages of notes, well

2394
02:22:13.879 --> 02:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred pages of notes on the medieval Heresy Book,

2395
02:22:16.520 --> 02:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>which all
