WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.240 --> 00:00:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Chapter seventeen, Part two of A short account of the

2
00:00:04.919 --> 00:00:10.439
<v Speaker 1>History of mathematics. This is a LibriVox recording. All LibriVox

3
00:00:10.480 --> 00:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>recordings are in the public domain. For more information or

4
00:00:14.359 --> 00:00:19.519
<v Speaker 1>to volunteer, please visit LibriVox dot org. This is a

5
00:00:19.559 --> 00:00:23.359
<v Speaker 1>reading by Paul King PJK dot scripts dot mit dot

6
00:00:23.559 --> 00:00:27.359
<v Speaker 1>ed U forward slash p k J. A Short account

7
00:00:27.399 --> 00:00:30.879
<v Speaker 1>of the history of mathematics by W. W. Rowse Ball,

8
00:00:31.559 --> 00:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Chapter seventeen, Libinitz and the Mathematicians of the first half

9
00:00:36.000 --> 00:00:40.679
<v Speaker 1>of the eighteenth century. Part two, the development of analysis

10
00:00:40.719 --> 00:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>on the continent. Leaving for a moment the English mathematicians

11
00:00:45.000 --> 00:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>of the first half of the eighteenth century, we come

12
00:00:48.200 --> 00:00:52.439
<v Speaker 1>to a number of continental writers who barely escape mediocrity,

13
00:00:53.039 --> 00:00:55.359
<v Speaker 1>and to whom it will be necessary to devote but

14
00:00:55.439 --> 00:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>few words. Their writings mark the steps by which analytics, geometry,

15
00:01:01.320 --> 00:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and the differential and integral calculus were perfected and made

16
00:01:04.840 --> 00:01:09.159
<v Speaker 1>familiar to mathematicians. Nearly all of them were pupils of

17
00:01:09.239 --> 00:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>one or other of the two elder Bernoullis, and they

18
00:01:12.920 --> 00:01:16.359
<v Speaker 1>were so nearly contemporaries that it is difficult to arrange

19
00:01:16.400 --> 00:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>them chronologically. The most eminent of them are Cramer, Degois

20
00:01:22.159 --> 00:01:29.599
<v Speaker 1>de Montemret, Fagagnon Lo Pital, NiCoT, parent Riccouti, Sarin and

21
00:01:29.760 --> 00:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Verignon lo Pital, Guillon, Francois Antoine lo Pital. Marquis de

22
00:01:37.439 --> 00:01:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Saint Mes born at Paris in sixteen sixty one and

23
00:01:41.519 --> 00:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>died there on February second, seventeen o four, was among

24
00:01:45.879 --> 00:01:49.599
<v Speaker 1>the earliest pupils of John Bernoulli, who in sixteen ninety

25
00:01:49.599 --> 00:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>one spent some months at Lopital's house in Paris for

26
00:01:53.959 --> 00:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the purpose of teaching them the new calculus. It seems strange,

27
00:01:58.959 --> 00:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>but it is substantial true that a knowledge of the

28
00:02:01.680 --> 00:02:05.599
<v Speaker 1>infinitesimal calculus and the power of using it was then

29
00:02:05.680 --> 00:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>confined to Newton, Leibnitz and the two elder Bernoulli's, and

30
00:02:10.400 --> 00:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>it will be noticed that they were the only mathematicians

31
00:02:14.280 --> 00:02:18.039
<v Speaker 1>who solve the more difficult problems then proposed as challenges.

32
00:02:20.280 --> 00:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>There was at the time no textbook on the subject,

33
00:02:23.879 --> 00:02:27.039
<v Speaker 1>and the credit of putting together the first treatise, which

34
00:02:27.039 --> 00:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>explained the principles and use of the method, is due

35
00:02:29.680 --> 00:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to Lopitale. It was published in sixteen ninety six under

36
00:02:33.680 --> 00:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the title Annelis des infinitemon petit. This contains a partial

37
00:02:38.879 --> 00:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>investigation of the limiting value of the ratio of functions which,

38
00:02:43.439 --> 00:02:47.639
<v Speaker 1>for a certain value of the variable take the indeterminate

39
00:02:47.759 --> 00:02:52.719
<v Speaker 1>form zero over zero, a problem solved by John Bernoulli

40
00:02:52.800 --> 00:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in seventeen o four. This work had a wide circulation.

41
00:02:57.159 --> 00:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>It brought the differential notation into universally use in France

42
00:03:01.439 --> 00:03:04.479
<v Speaker 1>and helped to make it generally known in Europe. A

43
00:03:04.520 --> 00:03:09.319
<v Speaker 1>supplement containing a similar treatment of the integral calculus, together

44
00:03:09.360 --> 00:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>with the editions of the differential calculus which had been

45
00:03:12.719 --> 00:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>made in the following half century, was published at Paris

46
00:03:17.039 --> 00:03:20.759
<v Speaker 1>seventeen fifty four to seventeen fifty six by L. A.

47
00:03:21.240 --> 00:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>De Bourganville. Lopitale took part in most of the challenges

48
00:03:26.159 --> 00:03:30.439
<v Speaker 1>by Leibniz, the Bernoullis, and other continental mathematicians of the time.

49
00:03:30.759 --> 00:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>In particular, he gave a solution of the burchistochrone and

50
00:03:34.919 --> 00:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>investigated the form of the solid of least resistance of

51
00:03:38.400 --> 00:03:42.599
<v Speaker 1>which Newton and the Principia had stated the result. He

52
00:03:42.680 --> 00:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>also wrote a treatise on analytical conics, which was published

53
00:03:46.000 --> 00:03:49.159
<v Speaker 1>in seventeen o seven and for nearly a century was

54
00:03:49.199 --> 00:03:55.479
<v Speaker 1>deemed a standard work. On the subject. Verignon Pierre Verignon

55
00:03:56.000 --> 00:03:59.159
<v Speaker 1>born at Caine in sixteen fifty four and died in

56
00:03:59.280 --> 00:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Paris on dad December twenty second, seventeen twenty two was

57
00:04:03.599 --> 00:04:08.159
<v Speaker 1>an intimate friend of Newton, Leibniz and the Bernoullis, and

58
00:04:08.199 --> 00:04:12.199
<v Speaker 1>after Lo Pitale, was the earliest and most powerful advocate

59
00:04:12.240 --> 00:04:15.719
<v Speaker 1>in France of the use of the differential calculus. He

60
00:04:15.800 --> 00:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>realized the necessity of obtaining a test for examining the

61
00:04:19.199 --> 00:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>convergency of series, but the analytical difficulties were beyond his powers.

62
00:04:25.800 --> 00:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>He simplified the proofs of many of the leading propositions

63
00:04:29.240 --> 00:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in mechanics, and in sixteen eighty seven recast the treatment

64
00:04:33.519 --> 00:04:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of the subject, basing it on the composition of forces.

65
00:04:37.639 --> 00:04:41.079
<v Speaker 1>His works were published at Paris in seventeen twenty five.

66
00:04:41.759 --> 00:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>For further details see the erouge by b. De Fontinelles, Paris,

67
00:04:46.399 --> 00:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>seventeen sixty six. Des Montemur Pierre Raymond de Montemur born

68
00:04:53.199 --> 00:04:57.399
<v Speaker 1>at Paris on October twenty seventh, sixteen seventy eight and

69
00:04:57.480 --> 00:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>died there on October seventh, seventeen nineteen was interested in

70
00:05:02.040 --> 00:05:07.319
<v Speaker 1>the subject of finite differences. He determined in seventeen thirteen,

71
00:05:07.600 --> 00:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the sum of n terms of a finite series of

72
00:05:10.519 --> 00:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the form en choose one times a plus, en choose

73
00:05:14.160 --> 00:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>two times delta a plus, en choose three times delta

74
00:05:17.399 --> 00:05:20.879
<v Speaker 1>squared day, and so on, a theorem which seems to

75
00:05:20.920 --> 00:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>have been independently rediscovered by Christian Goldbach in seventeen eighteen.

76
00:05:27.680 --> 00:05:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Nicole Francois Nicole, who was born at Paris on December

77
00:05:31.800 --> 00:05:36.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty third, sixteen eighty three and died there on January eighteenth,

78
00:05:36.399 --> 00:05:40.600
<v Speaker 1>seventeen fifty eight, was the first to publish a systematic

79
00:05:40.720 --> 00:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>treatise on the finite differences. Taylor had regarded the differential

80
00:05:45.639 --> 00:05:50.399
<v Speaker 1>coefficient as the ratio of two infinitesimal differences as the

81
00:05:50.439 --> 00:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>limiting value of the ratio of two finite differences, a

82
00:05:54.199 --> 00:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>method which is still used by many English writers, though

83
00:05:57.720 --> 00:06:01.199
<v Speaker 1>it has been generally abandoned on the DVD continent, and

84
00:06:01.279 --> 00:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>thus had been led to give a sketch of the

85
00:06:03.839 --> 00:06:09.639
<v Speaker 1>subject in his Methodists, published in seventeen fifteen. Nicoles Treete

86
00:06:09.800 --> 00:06:14.439
<v Speaker 1>de Quercuur de di France Finice was published in seventeen seventeen.

87
00:06:15.560 --> 00:06:18.439
<v Speaker 1>It is a well arranged book and contains rules both

88
00:06:18.480 --> 00:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>for forming differences and for affecting the summation of given series.

89
00:06:23.680 --> 00:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Besides this, in seventeen o six he wrote a book

90
00:06:27.160 --> 00:06:32.639
<v Speaker 1>on Roulette's especially spherical epicycloids, and in seventeen twenty nine

91
00:06:32.759 --> 00:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and seventeen thirty one he published memoirs on Newton's essay

92
00:06:36.519 --> 00:06:42.639
<v Speaker 1>on curves of the third degree. Parents Antoine Parents born

93
00:06:42.720 --> 00:06:47.199
<v Speaker 1>at Paris on September sixteenth, sixteen sixty six, and died

94
00:06:47.199 --> 00:06:51.879
<v Speaker 1>there on September twenty six, seventeen sixteen. Wrote in seventeen

95
00:06:52.000 --> 00:06:56.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred on analytical geometry of three dimensions. His works were

96
00:06:56.439 --> 00:06:59.959
<v Speaker 1>collected and published in three volumes at Paris in Sea

97
00:07:00.000 --> 00:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>seventeen thirteen. Sarrans Joseph Sarran, born at Corteizan in sixteen

98
00:07:07.160 --> 00:07:10.759
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine and died at Paris on December twenty ninth,

99
00:07:10.800 --> 00:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>seventeen thirty seven, was the first to show how the

100
00:07:14.199 --> 00:07:17.839
<v Speaker 1>tangents at the multiple points of curves could be determined

101
00:07:17.879 --> 00:07:22.639
<v Speaker 1>by analysis. De Nois Jean Paul de GUIs d'ar Mauves

102
00:07:22.920 --> 00:07:26.639
<v Speaker 1>was born at Carcasson in seventeen thirteen and died at

103
00:07:26.639 --> 00:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Paris on June second, seventeen eighty five. He published in

104
00:07:31.120 --> 00:07:34.839
<v Speaker 1>seventeen forty a work on analytical geometry, in which he

105
00:07:34.920 --> 00:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>applied it without the aid of the differential calculus, to

106
00:07:38.360 --> 00:07:42.439
<v Speaker 1>find the tangents, asymptotes, and various singular points of an

107
00:07:42.480 --> 00:07:47.639
<v Speaker 1>algebraical curve, and he further shoed how singular points and

108
00:07:47.759 --> 00:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>isolated loops were affected by conical projection. He gave the

109
00:07:52.240 --> 00:07:55.279
<v Speaker 1>proof of Descartes's rule of signs, which is to be

110
00:07:55.360 --> 00:07:58.639
<v Speaker 1>found in most modern works. It is not clear whether

111
00:07:58.720 --> 00:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Descartes ever proved its own strictly, and Newton seems to

112
00:08:02.000 --> 00:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>have regarded it as obvious. Kramer Gabrielle Kramer born at

113
00:08:08.040 --> 00:08:11.519
<v Speaker 1>Geneva in seventeen o four and died at Bagnol in

114
00:08:11.600 --> 00:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>seventeen fifty two, was professor at Geneva. The work by

115
00:08:16.959 --> 00:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>which he is best known is his Treatise on Algebraical Curves,

116
00:08:21.519 --> 00:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>published in seventeen fifty, which, as far as it goes,

117
00:08:25.120 --> 00:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>is fairly complete. It contains the earliest demonstration that a

118
00:08:29.199 --> 00:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>curve of the nth degree is in general determined if

119
00:08:33.559 --> 00:08:36.399
<v Speaker 1>one half end times en plus three points on it

120
00:08:36.480 --> 00:08:40.759
<v Speaker 1>to be given. This work is still sometimes read. Besides this,

121
00:08:40.919 --> 00:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>he edited that the works of the two elder Bernoullis,

122
00:08:43.600 --> 00:08:46.639
<v Speaker 1>and wrote on the physical cause of the spheroidal shapes

123
00:08:46.679 --> 00:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of the planets and the motion of their apses seventeen

124
00:08:50.480 --> 00:08:57.039
<v Speaker 1>thirty and on Newton's treatment of cubic curves seventeen forty six. Riccati,

125
00:08:57.320 --> 00:09:02.159
<v Speaker 1>Jacopo Francesco Count Riccati, born at Venice on May twenty eighth,

126
00:09:02.240 --> 00:09:07.159
<v Speaker 1>sixteen seventy six and died at Treves on April fifteenth,

127
00:09:07.240 --> 00:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>seventeen fifty four, did a great deal to disseminate a

128
00:09:11.240 --> 00:09:15.799
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of the Newtonian philosophy in Italy. Besides the equation

129
00:09:15.960 --> 00:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>known by his name, certain cases of which he succeeded

130
00:09:19.879 --> 00:09:24.039
<v Speaker 1>in integrating, he discussed the question of the possibility of

131
00:09:24.159 --> 00:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>lowering the order of a given differential equation. His works

132
00:09:28.480 --> 00:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>were published at Treves in four volumes in seventeen fifty eight.

133
00:09:33.039 --> 00:09:35.799
<v Speaker 1>He had two sons who wrote on several minor points

134
00:09:35.840 --> 00:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>connected with the integral calculus and differential equations, and applied

135
00:09:40.320 --> 00:09:45.799
<v Speaker 1>the calculus to several mechanical questions. These were Vincenzo, who

136
00:09:45.960 --> 00:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>was born in seventeen o seven and died in seventeen

137
00:09:48.919 --> 00:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy five, and Giordano who was born in seventeen o

138
00:09:52.759 --> 00:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>nine and died in seventeen ninety. Fagnano Giulio Carlo, Count

139
00:09:59.039 --> 00:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Fagnano and Marquise de Toci, born at Senegaglia on December sixth,

140
00:10:05.480 --> 00:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>sixteen eighty two and died on September twenty sixth, seventeen

141
00:10:09.360 --> 00:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>sixty six, may be said to have been the first

142
00:10:12.240 --> 00:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>writer who directed attention to the theory of elliptic functions.

143
00:10:16.720 --> 00:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Failing to rectify the ellipse or hyperbolea, Faniano attempted to

144
00:10:21.279 --> 00:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>determine arcs whose difference should be rectifiable. He also pointed

145
00:10:26.080 --> 00:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>out the remarkable analogy existing between the integrals which represent

146
00:10:30.320 --> 00:10:32.519
<v Speaker 1>the arc of a circle and the arc of a

147
00:10:32.600 --> 00:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Lemnas gate. Finally, he proved the formula pie equals two

148
00:10:37.679 --> 00:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>times i times the log of one minus i divided

149
00:10:41.480 --> 00:10:44.519
<v Speaker 1>by one plus i, where I stands for the square

150
00:10:44.600 --> 00:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>root of minus one. His works were collected and published

151
00:10:48.480 --> 00:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in two volumes in Persero in seventeen fifty. It was

152
00:10:54.360 --> 00:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>inevitable that some mathematicians should object to methods of analysis

153
00:10:58.200 --> 00:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>founded on the infinitesimal calcis. The most prominent of these

154
00:11:02.840 --> 00:11:08.399
<v Speaker 1>were Viviani de la Here and roll chronologically they come here,

155
00:11:09.120 --> 00:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>but they flourished half a century after the date to

156
00:11:12.080 --> 00:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>which their writings properly belong. Viviani Vincenzo Viviani, a pupil

157
00:11:19.120 --> 00:11:24.279
<v Speaker 1>of Galileo and Torricelli, born at Florence on April fifth,

158
00:11:24.320 --> 00:11:28.279
<v Speaker 1>sixteen twenty two, and died there on September twenty second.

159
00:11:28.519 --> 00:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Seventeen o three, brought out in sixteen fifty nine a

160
00:11:32.320 --> 00:11:36.799
<v Speaker 1>restoration of the lost Book of Apollonius on conic sections,

161
00:11:36.840 --> 00:11:40.039
<v Speaker 1>and in seventeen oh one a restoration of the work

162
00:11:40.080 --> 00:11:44.799
<v Speaker 1>of Erestius. He explained in sixteen seventy seven how an

163
00:11:44.840 --> 00:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>angle could be trisected by the aid of an echilateral

164
00:11:48.080 --> 00:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>hyperbola or the conchoid. In sixteen ninety two he proposed

165
00:11:52.720 --> 00:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the problem to construct four windows in a hemispherical vault

166
00:11:57.000 --> 00:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>so that the remainder of the surface can be accurate determined,

167
00:12:01.639 --> 00:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a celebrated problem of which analytical solutions were given by

168
00:12:06.120 --> 00:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Wallace Leibnitz, David Gregory, and James Bernoulli. De la Here

169
00:12:12.440 --> 00:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Philippe de la Here or Lahire born in Paris on

170
00:12:16.200 --> 00:12:20.159
<v Speaker 1>March eighteen, sixteen forty and died there on April twenty first,

171
00:12:20.320 --> 00:12:25.399
<v Speaker 1>seventeen nineteen, wrote on graphical methods sixteen seventy three, on

172
00:12:25.440 --> 00:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the conic sections sixteen eighty five, a treatise on epicycloids

173
00:12:30.240 --> 00:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>sixteen ninety four, one on roulettes seventeen o two, and

174
00:12:34.480 --> 00:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>lastly another on conchoids seventeen oh eight. His works on

175
00:12:39.440 --> 00:12:42.879
<v Speaker 1>conic sections and epicycloids were founded on the teaching of

176
00:12:42.960 --> 00:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>de Rogues, whose favorite pupil he was. He also translated

177
00:12:48.000 --> 00:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the essay of Muscopolis on magic squares and collected many

178
00:12:52.639 --> 00:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of the theorems on them which were previously known. This was

179
00:12:56.399 --> 00:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>published in seventeen oh five. Roule Michel Rol born at

180
00:13:01.720 --> 00:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Ambert on April twenty first, sixteen fifty two and died

181
00:13:06.279 --> 00:13:10.679
<v Speaker 1>in Paris on November eighth, seventeen nineteen. Wrote an algebra

182
00:13:10.919 --> 00:13:14.399
<v Speaker 1>in sixteen eighty nine which contains the theorem on the

183
00:13:14.440 --> 00:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>position of roots of an equation, which is known by

184
00:13:17.639 --> 00:13:21.559
<v Speaker 1>his name. He published in sixteen ninety six a treatise

185
00:13:21.559 --> 00:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>on the solution of equations whether determinate or indeterminate, and

186
00:13:26.720 --> 00:13:30.799
<v Speaker 1>he produced several other minor works. He taught that differential

187
00:13:30.840 --> 00:13:36.679
<v Speaker 1>calculus was nothing but a collection of ingenious fallacies so far,

188
00:13:37.279 --> 00:13:39.519
<v Speaker 1>no one of the school of Leibnitz and the two

189
00:13:39.559 --> 00:13:43.639
<v Speaker 1>elder Bernoullis had shewn any exceptional ability. But by the

190
00:13:43.679 --> 00:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>action of a number of second rate writers, the methods

191
00:13:47.240 --> 00:13:50.799
<v Speaker 1>and language of analytical geometry and the differential calculus had

192
00:13:50.799 --> 00:13:54.519
<v Speaker 1>become well known. By about seventeen forty. The close of

193
00:13:54.519 --> 00:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>this school is marked by the appearance of Cleirot de

194
00:13:57.759 --> 00:14:03.159
<v Speaker 1>l'embert and Danielle Bernoulli. Their lives overlap the period considered

195
00:14:03.200 --> 00:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in the next chapter. But though it is difficult to

196
00:14:06.080 --> 00:14:08.879
<v Speaker 1>draw a sharp dividing line which shall separate by a

197
00:14:08.919 --> 00:14:12.879
<v Speaker 1>definite date, the mathematicians there considered from those whose writings

198
00:14:12.879 --> 00:14:16.159
<v Speaker 1>are discussed in this chapter, I think that on the whole,

199
00:14:16.240 --> 00:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the works of these three writers are best treated here.

200
00:14:20.559 --> 00:14:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Claiaut Alexis Claude Clat was born at Paris on May thirteenth,

201
00:14:26.240 --> 00:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>seventeen thirteen and died there on May seventeenth, seventeen sixty five.

202
00:14:32.159 --> 00:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>He belongs to the small group of children who, though

203
00:14:35.039 --> 00:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of exceptional precaucity, survive and maintain their powers when grown up.

204
00:14:40.919 --> 00:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>As early as the age of twelve, he wrote a

205
00:14:43.039 --> 00:14:47.159
<v Speaker 1>memoir on four geometrical curves, but his first important work

206
00:14:47.279 --> 00:14:50.879
<v Speaker 1>was a treatise on tortuous curves, published when he was eighteen,

207
00:14:51.519 --> 00:14:55.559
<v Speaker 1>a work which first procured for him immediate admission to

208
00:14:55.600 --> 00:14:59.039
<v Speaker 1>the French Academy. In seventeen thirty one, he gave a

209
00:14:59.080 --> 00:15:02.679
<v Speaker 1>demonstration of the fact noted by Newton that all curves

210
00:15:02.720 --> 00:15:06.279
<v Speaker 1>of the third order were projections of one of five parabolas.

211
00:15:07.440 --> 00:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>In seventeen forty one Clairot went on a scientific expedition

212
00:15:12.320 --> 00:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to measure the length of a meridian degree on the

213
00:15:15.440 --> 00:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Earth's surface, and on his return in seventeen forty three

214
00:15:19.960 --> 00:15:24.279
<v Speaker 1>he publishes THII de la figure de lataire. This is

215
00:15:24.320 --> 00:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>founded on a paper by Maclaurin, where it has been

216
00:15:28.039 --> 00:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>shown that a mass of homogeneous fluids set in rotation

217
00:15:31.519 --> 00:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>about a line through its center of mass, would, under

218
00:15:34.519 --> 00:15:37.399
<v Speaker 1>the mutual attraction of its particles, take the form of

219
00:15:37.399 --> 00:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a spheroid. This work of cliat treated of heterogeneous spheroids

220
00:15:43.320 --> 00:15:46.679
<v Speaker 1>and contains the proof of his formula for the accelerating

221
00:15:46.879 --> 00:15:50.759
<v Speaker 1>effect of gravity in a place of latitude L namely,

222
00:15:51.399 --> 00:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>G equals big g multiplied by one plus five halves

223
00:15:57.240 --> 00:16:02.799
<v Speaker 1>m minus epsilon multiplied by sience squaredel where g is

224
00:16:02.799 --> 00:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the value of equatorial gravity, m the ratio of the

225
00:16:06.759 --> 00:16:11.399
<v Speaker 1>centrifugal force to gravity at the equator, and epsilon the

226
00:16:11.440 --> 00:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>epelicity of a meridian section of the Earth. In eighteen

227
00:16:15.519 --> 00:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>forty nine, Professor Stokes shewed that the same result was

228
00:16:18.919 --> 00:16:22.519
<v Speaker 1>true whatever was the interior construction or density of the Earth,

229
00:16:23.080 --> 00:16:27.559
<v Speaker 1>provided the surface was a spheroid of equilibrium of small

230
00:16:27.720 --> 00:16:33.279
<v Speaker 1>ellipticity impressed by it the power of geometry, as shewn

231
00:16:33.360 --> 00:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>in the writing of Newton and McLaurin. Clarat abandoned analysis,

232
00:16:38.679 --> 00:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and his next work, The Theore de l Lune, published

233
00:16:42.240 --> 00:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in seventeen fifty two, is strictly Newtonian in character. This

234
00:16:46.759 --> 00:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>contains the explanation of the motion of the apse, which

235
00:16:50.519 --> 00:16:55.759
<v Speaker 1>had previously puzzled astronomers, and which Clarat had at first

236
00:16:55.759 --> 00:16:58.879
<v Speaker 1>deemed so inexplicable that he was on the point of

237
00:16:58.879 --> 00:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>publishing a new hype apothesis as to the law of

238
00:17:01.480 --> 00:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>attraction when it occurred to him to carry the approximation

239
00:17:05.559 --> 00:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to the third order, and he thereupon found that the

240
00:17:08.960 --> 00:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>result was in accordance with observations. This was followed in

241
00:17:14.279 --> 00:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>seventeen fifty four by some lunar tables. Claiat subsequently wrote

242
00:17:19.200 --> 00:17:22.519
<v Speaker 1>various papers on the orbit of the Moon and on

243
00:17:22.599 --> 00:17:25.559
<v Speaker 1>the motion of the comets as affected by the perturbation

244
00:17:25.720 --> 00:17:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of the planets, particularly on the path of Halley's comet.

245
00:17:31.920 --> 00:17:36.519
<v Speaker 1>His growing popularity in society hindered his scientific work on Gaget,

246
00:17:36.599 --> 00:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>says beaussu a de supei a de viller entarnaier parent

247
00:17:41.480 --> 00:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>gudvive poulefame Voulain alais brasier, a stravau denaire a padire

248
00:17:48.880 --> 00:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>pou la sante enfan villellages de Saint Conden de Lambert.

249
00:17:58.079 --> 00:18:01.039
<v Speaker 1>Jean de ren d' lambert was born at Paris on

250
00:18:01.079 --> 00:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>November sixteenth, seventeen seventeen, and died there on October twenty ninth,

251
00:18:06.319 --> 00:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>seventeen thirteen. He was the illegitimate child of the Chevalier Destouche,

252
00:18:12.160 --> 00:18:14.759
<v Speaker 1>being abandoned by his mother on the steps of the

253
00:18:14.759 --> 00:18:18.839
<v Speaker 1>little church of Saint Jean Leran, which then nestled under

254
00:18:18.839 --> 00:18:21.759
<v Speaker 1>the great porch of nottal Dame, he was taken to

255
00:18:21.839 --> 00:18:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the parish commissary, who, following the usual practice in such cases,

256
00:18:26.759 --> 00:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>gave him the Christian name of Jean laran I. Do

257
00:18:30.200 --> 00:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>not know by what title. He subsequently assumed the right

258
00:18:33.279 --> 00:18:36.759
<v Speaker 1>to prefix DA to his name. He was boarded out

259
00:18:36.799 --> 00:18:39.839
<v Speaker 1>by the parish with the wife of a glazier in

260
00:18:39.920 --> 00:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a small way of business who lived near the cathedral,

261
00:18:43.480 --> 00:18:45.759
<v Speaker 1>and here he seems to have found a real home,

262
00:18:46.200 --> 00:18:49.599
<v Speaker 1>though a very humble one. His father appears to have

263
00:18:49.640 --> 00:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>looked after him and paid for his going to a

264
00:18:52.160 --> 00:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>school where he obtained a fair mathematical education. An essay

265
00:18:56.720 --> 00:19:00.079
<v Speaker 1>written in seventeen thirty eight on the integral calculus, and

266
00:19:00.119 --> 00:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>another in seventeen forty on ducks and drakes or ricochets,

267
00:19:04.279 --> 00:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>attracted some attention, and in the same year he was

268
00:19:07.440 --> 00:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>elected a member of the French Academy. This was probably

269
00:19:11.559 --> 00:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>due to the influence of his father. It is to

270
00:19:14.759 --> 00:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>his credit that he absolutely refused to leave his adopted mother,

271
00:19:19.079 --> 00:19:21.799
<v Speaker 1>with whom he continued to live until her death in

272
00:19:21.880 --> 00:19:26.519
<v Speaker 1>seventeen fifty seven. It cannot be said that she sympathized

273
00:19:26.519 --> 00:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>with his success, for at the height of his fame

274
00:19:29.599 --> 00:19:33.440
<v Speaker 1>she remonstrated with him for wasting his talents on such work.

275
00:19:34.400 --> 00:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Vuniserreemeh kun Philissov said she e keskun Philissov Situnfu quissitour

276
00:19:41.279 --> 00:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Monte padas Seville pour compard de luis LUs kilne serre plus.

277
00:19:48.480 --> 00:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Nearly all his mathematical works were produced within the years

278
00:19:52.079 --> 00:19:56.880
<v Speaker 1>seventeen forty three to seventeen fifty four. The first of

279
00:19:57.000 --> 00:20:00.839
<v Speaker 1>these was his Treete de di neemik public in seventeen

280
00:20:00.960 --> 00:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>forty three, in which he enunciates the principle known by

281
00:20:04.440 --> 00:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>his name, namely that the internal forces of inertia i e.

282
00:20:08.359 --> 00:20:12.519
<v Speaker 1>The forces which resist acceleration must be equal and opposite

283
00:20:12.559 --> 00:20:16.519
<v Speaker 1>to the forces which produce the acceleration. This is a

284
00:20:16.640 --> 00:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>particular case of Newton's second reading of his third Law

285
00:20:20.200 --> 00:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of motion, but the full consequence of it had not

286
00:20:23.599 --> 00:20:28.559
<v Speaker 1>been realized previously. The application of this principle enables us

287
00:20:28.640 --> 00:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to obtain the differential equations of motion of any rigid system.

288
00:20:33.400 --> 00:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>In seventeen forty four, Dalembert publishest t rete de EquiLibre

289
00:20:38.119 --> 00:20:41.759
<v Speaker 1>in de movement de fluids, in which he applies his

290
00:20:41.920 --> 00:20:46.559
<v Speaker 1>principle to fluids. This led to partial differential equations, which

291
00:20:46.599 --> 00:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>he was then unable to solve. In seventeen forty five

292
00:20:50.279 --> 00:20:52.799
<v Speaker 1>he developed that part of the Subjects, which dealt with

293
00:20:52.920 --> 00:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>the motion of air in his Thera General de Van,

294
00:20:57.279 --> 00:21:01.559
<v Speaker 1>and this again led him to partial difference equations. A

295
00:21:01.680 --> 00:21:05.559
<v Speaker 1>second edition of this in seventeen forty six was dedicated

296
00:21:05.640 --> 00:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>to Frederick the Great of Prussia, and procured an invitation

297
00:21:09.559 --> 00:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>to Berlin and the offer of a pension. He declined

298
00:21:13.200 --> 00:21:17.759
<v Speaker 1>the former, but subsequently, after some pressing, pocketed his pride

299
00:21:18.000 --> 00:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and the latter. In seventeen forty seven he applied the

300
00:21:22.319 --> 00:21:26.079
<v Speaker 1>differential calculus to the problem of a vibrating string, and

301
00:21:26.200 --> 00:21:30.640
<v Speaker 1>again arrived at a partial differential equation. His analysis had

302
00:21:30.720 --> 00:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>three times brought him to an equation of the form

303
00:21:33.920 --> 00:21:37.319
<v Speaker 1>the second derivative of you with respect to T equals

304
00:21:37.359 --> 00:21:41.079
<v Speaker 1>the second derivative of U with respect to X, and

305
00:21:41.279 --> 00:21:44.319
<v Speaker 1>he now succeeded in shewing that it was satisfied by

306
00:21:44.480 --> 00:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>U equals Fi of x plus T plus Sci of

307
00:21:51.039 --> 00:21:55.839
<v Speaker 1>x minus t, Where Pi and Si are arbitrary functions.

308
00:21:56.319 --> 00:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>It may be interesting to give his solution, which was

309
00:21:59.559 --> 00:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>published in the Transactions of the Berlin Academy for seventeen

310
00:22:03.079 --> 00:22:07.319
<v Speaker 1>forty seven. He begins by saying that if the partial

311
00:22:07.440 --> 00:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>derivative of U with respect to X be denoted by P,

312
00:22:10.680 --> 00:22:13.079
<v Speaker 1>and the partial derivative of u with respect to t

313
00:22:13.319 --> 00:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>by q, then du equals pdx plus qdt. But by

314
00:22:19.240 --> 00:22:22.799
<v Speaker 1>the given equation, the partial derivative of q with respect

315
00:22:22.880 --> 00:22:25.799
<v Speaker 1>to T equals the partial derivative of p with respect

316
00:22:25.880 --> 00:22:30.519
<v Speaker 1>to x, and therefore pdt plus qdx is also an

317
00:22:30.599 --> 00:22:36.799
<v Speaker 1>exact differential. Denote it by DV. Therefore, dv equals pdt

318
00:22:37.000 --> 00:22:41.839
<v Speaker 1>plus qdx. Hence du plus dv equals pdx plus qdt

319
00:22:42.079 --> 00:22:46.799
<v Speaker 1>plus pdt plus qdx equals p plus q multiplied by

320
00:22:46.880 --> 00:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>dx plus dt, and du minus dv equals pdx plus

321
00:22:52.119 --> 00:22:57.759
<v Speaker 1>qdt minus. The quantity pdt plus qdx equals the quantity

322
00:22:58.079 --> 00:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>p minus q multiplied the quantity d x minus d T.

323
00:23:03.079 --> 00:23:05.599
<v Speaker 1>Thus U plus v must be a function of x

324
00:23:05.680 --> 00:23:09.279
<v Speaker 1>plus t, and U minus v must be a function

325
00:23:09.359 --> 00:23:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of x minus t. We may therefore put U plus

326
00:23:12.759 --> 00:23:17.400
<v Speaker 1>v equals two times fi of x plus t, and

327
00:23:17.920 --> 00:23:21.319
<v Speaker 1>U minus v equals to ci of x minus t,

328
00:23:22.559 --> 00:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Hence U equals fi of x plus t plus ci

329
00:23:26.880 --> 00:23:30.559
<v Speaker 1>of x minus t. De Lambert added that the conditions

330
00:23:30.599 --> 00:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of the physical problem of a vibrating string demand that

331
00:23:34.039 --> 00:23:37.279
<v Speaker 1>when x equals zero, U should vanish for all values

332
00:23:37.319 --> 00:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of T, Hence, identically fi of T plus Si of

333
00:23:42.599 --> 00:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>negative T equals zero. Assuming that both functions can be

334
00:23:47.359 --> 00:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>expanded in integral powers of t, this requires that they

335
00:23:51.160 --> 00:23:55.839
<v Speaker 1>should contain only odd powers. Hence si of negative T

336
00:23:56.119 --> 00:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>equals negative, Fi of T equals fi of negative T.

337
00:24:00.200 --> 00:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Therefore U equals pi of x plus T plus fi

338
00:24:05.640 --> 00:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of x minus t. Euler now took the matter up

339
00:24:09.279 --> 00:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>and shewed that the equation of the form of the

340
00:24:11.440 --> 00:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>string was the second derivative of U with respect to

341
00:24:15.119 --> 00:24:19.640
<v Speaker 1>T equals a squared multiplied by the second derivative of

342
00:24:19.799 --> 00:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>U with respect to x, and that the general integral

343
00:24:23.960 --> 00:24:29.599
<v Speaker 1>was U equals pi of x minus at plus pi

344
00:24:29.839 --> 00:24:34.519
<v Speaker 1>of x plus at, where pi and pi are arbitrary functions.

345
00:24:35.400 --> 00:24:39.599
<v Speaker 1>The chief remaining contributions of de Lambert to mathematics were

346
00:24:39.680 --> 00:24:44.559
<v Speaker 1>on physical astronomy, especially on the precession of the equinoxes,

347
00:24:45.119 --> 00:24:48.799
<v Speaker 1>and on variations of the obliquity of the ecliptic. These

348
00:24:48.880 --> 00:24:52.599
<v Speaker 1>were collected on his Sistem des Mondes, published in three

349
00:24:52.720 --> 00:24:57.400
<v Speaker 1>volumes in seventeen fifty four. During the latter part of

350
00:24:57.480 --> 00:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>his life he was mainly occupied with the d S

351
00:25:00.119 --> 00:25:04.519
<v Speaker 1>Great French Encyclopedia. For this he wrote the introduction, and

352
00:25:04.720 --> 00:25:09.039
<v Speaker 1>numerous philosophical and mathematical articles. The best are those on

353
00:25:09.200 --> 00:25:14.279
<v Speaker 1>geometry and on probabilities. His style is brilliant but not polished,

354
00:25:14.680 --> 00:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and faithfully reflects his character, which was bold, honest and frank.

355
00:25:19.319 --> 00:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>He defended a severe criticism which he had offered on

356
00:25:23.359 --> 00:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>some mediocre work by the remark Jeans musettin Seville Connuier,

357
00:25:28.759 --> 00:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and with his dislike of sickophants and boors, it is

358
00:25:31.759 --> 00:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>not surprising that during his life he had more enemies

359
00:25:35.079 --> 00:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>than friends. End of section twenty eight. Recording by Paul King, Oakville, Ontario,

360
00:25:44.039 --> 00:25:46.400
<v Speaker 1>p j K dot scripts dot m I T dot

361
00:25:46.480 --> 00:25:48.839
<v Speaker 1>e edu forward slash p kJ
