Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
Epstein Chronicles. Back in twenty twenty three, there was a
breach of the FBI mainframe where a hacker agained access
to the Epstein files, and according to the report from Reuters,
the activity included calling through certain files pertaining to the
Epstein investigation. So my question is, how does something like
that even happen. You would think that the FBI would
have their shit on lock, and you would think that
they'd have some kind of layered protection to make sure
people can't get access to these files. And it really
slams the point home that the FBI just can't be
trusted when it comes to anything Jeffrey Epstein. And to
be clear, this happened during the Biden administration, and it
just goes to show you the long line of failures
that we're dealing with when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein.
So today we have an article from cybernews dot com
the headline Epstein files compromised by a foreign hacker who
breached the FBI. This article was originally published by Reuters.
The details of who access to server at the FBI's
New York Field office, including the allegation that a foreign
hacker was involved are being reported for the first time.
In a statement, the FBI said, what it described as
a cyber incident was an isolated one. Oh well, in
that case, folks, everything's okay. It was just an isolated incident.
Do they think we're stupid? If this was targeted and
they were looking for certain documents, all they needed was
an isolated incident. They didn't need to have access to
the server for months on end. If they were looking
for specific files or specific information, all they needed was
an isolated incident. So the question should be what did
they access, what files, what did they take? Did they
change anything? We need a full accounting of that. The
FBI restricted access to the malicious actor and rectified the network.
The investigation remains ongoing, so we do not have further
comments to provide at this time. Oh, of course, another
ongoing investigation. God forbid they give us any information about
anything ever. But one thing we do know is that
this server was breached and this information was accessed by
a malicious actor. And considering how many pies Jeffrey Epstein
had his hands in around the world, it could be anybody.
Masad Russia fucking China. Who knows, honestly at this point,
who knows? Epstein was so intertwined with people that it
could be anybody? And of course we can't rule out
our own CIA what they can't make it look like
it was a foreign actor doing this. Come on, we
all know the truth, and as far as I'm concerned,
the CIA sure has a lot to hide when it
comes to their life relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. If you
think the CIA was not aware of Epstein, didn't know
who Epstein was, wasn't in bed with Epstein, I really
don't know what to tell you. Although the source said
the intrusion appeared to be carried out by a cyber
criminal rather than a foreign government, the incident underscores the
files potential intelligence value. One academic said, well, there's no
doubt there's a ton of intelligence value there. So it
really makes me wonder why it wasn't protected better. You
mean to tell me the FBI can't safeguard this information
in a manner that can't be accessed by foreign actors.
Or could it be that the FBI knows exactly who
did this and they plan on looking the other way
and sweeping it under the rug. Again. We can't rule
anything out. And I wish I could sit here and
tell you that I trust the DOJ or the FBI
or anybody in power, But I don't because for years
and years and years they've taken a dump on us,
So why should I give them the benefit of the
doubt in a situation like this. The legally mandated publication
of US Justice Department documents has exposed the dead financiers
ties to prominent people in politics, finance, academia, and business,
triggering investigations in numerous countries around the world. Who wouldn't
be going after the Epstein files if you're the Russians
or somebody interested in compromont said John Lindsay, who researches
the role of emerging technology and global security at the
Georgia Institute of Technology. If foreign intelligence agencies are not
thinking seriously about the Epstein files as a target, then
I would be shocked. Well, I agree with them. There
there's no doubt that it looks like a juicy target
for foreign intelligence. I mean, can you imagine the treasure
trove of information the FBI has when it comes to
Jeffrey Epstein. I mean, you have to know your employees right.
The breach was reported contemporaneously by CNN and Reuters. On
February seventeenth, The connection to Epstein material was made by
the French magazine Mary Anne. Yo, that's the whole last problem.
Why aren't our media services here in America putting two
and two together. Why aren't they building the case. Why
aren't they bringing their findings to the American people. Why
aren't they holding the administration accountable? Why is it that
a foreign news outlet called Mary Anne breaks this story?
How is that even possible? I'll tell you why. Because
they still don't get it, they still don't care, and
a lot of them are still running cover for the
people that enabled and co conspired with Jeffrey Epstein. The
legacy media has done a fantastic job when it comes
to covering up for Jeffrey Epstein. But now now they'll
tell you that they're the heroes. They were the shining
light in the darkness, and without the legacy media, we'd
have none of this information. But the truth is, the
legacy media has just piggybacked off the work of other
people and now they're acting like they care all of
a sudden, But before they couldn't be bothered. Have we
forgotten about ABC? Have we forgotten about all these outlets
that call this a conspiracy theory? And look, it's not
only the legacy media. You have a lot of these people, podcasters, etc.
Who are on the left who had no time for
Jeffrey Epstein previously, but now all of a sudden, that's
all they talk about. And the vast majority of them,
I hate to say, have no idea what they're even
talking about. And it's in that confusion that a cover
up like this thrives. The more confusion, the better. The
less cohesiveness the better. The more the people are at
odds with each other, the better. And I don't know
about you, but I'm tired of marching to their tune.
In fact, they want this to be a parade like March,
but instead what they're going to get is a mosh pit. Epstein,
a longtime associate of President Donald Trump, pleaded guilty in
two thousand and eight to prostitution charges, including soliciting an
underage girl. He was found hanged in his jail cell
in twenty nineteen and what was ruled to suicide after
being arrested again on federal charges of sex trafficking miners,
and as you all know, I have my doubts about that,
and that's why we're spending so much time on these
OIG interviews with people that were there the night Epstein died.
And I think it's very apparent that we're not getting
the whole truth. The hack occurred after a server at
the Child Exploitation Forensic Lab in the FBI's New York
Field office was inadvertently left vulnerable by Special Agent Aaron Spivak,
who was trying to navigate the bureau's complex procedure for
handling digital evidence. According to the source and the documents,
hell of a job, mister speak. Has anybody checked his
bank account? Was he paid to leave this doorway open?
And again, look, I don't know. I'm not saying that
he did. I'm asking about the investigation, right, And I
think we've learned over the years that we have to
ask all these questions. I know we shouldn't have to
ask them, it should just be second nature for a
real investigation. But this is not a real investigation, so
of course we have to hold our feet to the fire.
A timeline written by Spivac and included in the large
cash of Epstein documents released earlier this year, said the
breaking happened on February twelfth, twenty twenty three. It was
discovered the following day when Spivac turned on his computer
and discovered a text file warning them that his network
had been compromised. Well, according to that document, further investigation
turned up traces of unusual activity on the server, the
document said, adding that the activity included combing through certain
files pertaining to the Epstein investment mitigation. Well, isn't that nice? Huh?
I wonder what they had access to, what they got
and what was destroyed, because what you think they just
took a look? Highly doubt that. Further investigation turned up
traces of unusual activity on the server, the document said,
adding that the activity included combing through certain files pertaining
to the Epstein investigation. The timeline does not say which
specific files were accessed, whether the hacker downloaded the data,
or who the hacker was. Reuters could not establish what,
if any overlap the affected data had with the Epstein
documents published earlier this year, or the files that remained
under wraps. We need a full accounting of this. What
went down, how did it happen? And what's the report? Right?
Congress needs to get involved here. I mean, this isn't
setting off red flags and alert bells for everybody else, Like,
what are we doing here? Vivak, whose name appears elsewhere
in the documents in connection with the Epstein investigation, did
not return repeated messages seeking comment. Reuters was unable to
reach the man identified in the documents as Spivak's lawyer,
Richard J. Roberson Junior, and seven FBI agents identified in
the documents as being involved in the investigation into the
incident did not return messages. This is wholly unacceptable. The
FBI needs to provide clarity on this, what happened, when
it happened, and where we are in the investigation now.
In his statement to FBI investigators examining whether he was
responsible for the breach, Spivak said he was being made
a scapegoat for the intrusion and that the conflicting bureau
policies and faulty guidance around information technology were to blame.
Reuters cannot establish the result of the bureau's internal investigation.
Probably the same as usual, nothing happens. Oh, don't do
that again, mister Spivak. Meanwhile, the damage is already done.
The person familiar with the breach said the intrusion was
carried out by a foreign hacker who did not appear
to realize they had penetrated a law enforcement server. The
hacker expressed disgust at the presence of child abuse images
on the device and left a message threatening to turn
its owner over to the FBI, the person said. The
source said the bureau officials diffuse the situation by convincing
the hacker that they actually were the FBI, in part
by having the hacker joined a video chat where they
flashed their law enforcement credentials in front of a web camera.
What what in the hell's going on here? And mind you,
this is twenty twenty three, so let's not forget this
was that idiot Merrick Garland's DJ, and boy were they
a bunch of boobs? Oh, let's have a video chat
with a hacker. Here's an idea, how about you send
a Tomahawk missile through his window. Many of the Justice
Department's documents have been heavily redacted, and others have been
kept secret altogether, despite a law mandating their full release.
Last year, the Trump administration says it's withholding material that
could compromise victims identities or jeopardize ongoing investigations. Well, we
know there's no ongoing investigations, and we know they don't
care about people's identities considering how shitty they've been when
it comes to concealing them. So really, what they're doing
is just giving all of us the middle finger. Right,
you're not getting these documents and there's nothing you can
do about it. Oh and by the way, did you
hear that a hacker hacked our shit and was perusing
our Epstein files? Yeah, but no big deal. We don't
need to alert anybody about that. No committee needs to
be held over that. We don't need to have any
kind of public answers for that. Can somebody tell me
again why I should trust the DOJ or the FBI,
because I can't come up with a reason at this point,
and it seems like every time we turn around, they're
giving us another reason not to trust them. And when
we hear about situations like this, it just slams that
point home. So obviously Congress needs to get involved here,
and they need to subpoena mister Spivak and anybody else
involved and of course that's what would happen if this
was a real investigation. But considering it's nothing more than
political theater, I would suggest that you get comfortable now
with the fact that we're never going to know anything
really about this hack and who was involved. So let's
see where this all goes, and let's see what kind
of information we end up getting. But I have my
doubts if we're ever going to get any clarity here,
So we'll keep an eye on it, and when we
do have some more information one way or the other,
we'll make sure to update the catalog. As for this one, well,
that's going to do it. All the information that goes
with this episode can be found in the description box.