1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:03,240
Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the

2
00:00:03,240 --> 00:00:07,559
Epstein Chronicles. Back in twenty twenty three, there was a

3
00:00:07,639 --> 00:00:13,240
breach of the FBI mainframe where a hacker agained access

4
00:00:14,160 --> 00:00:18,879
to the Epstein files, and according to the report from Reuters,

5
00:00:19,239 --> 00:00:23,519
the activity included calling through certain files pertaining to the

6
00:00:23,519 --> 00:00:27,359
Epstein investigation. So my question is, how does something like

7
00:00:27,359 --> 00:00:30,879
that even happen. You would think that the FBI would

8
00:00:30,920 --> 00:00:33,560
have their shit on lock, and you would think that

9
00:00:33,640 --> 00:00:36,280
they'd have some kind of layered protection to make sure

10
00:00:36,320 --> 00:00:39,000
people can't get access to these files. And it really

11
00:00:39,000 --> 00:00:41,880
slams the point home that the FBI just can't be

12
00:00:41,960 --> 00:00:45,439
trusted when it comes to anything Jeffrey Epstein. And to

13
00:00:45,479 --> 00:00:50,159
be clear, this happened during the Biden administration, and it

14
00:00:50,280 --> 00:00:52,600
just goes to show you the long line of failures

15
00:00:53,119 --> 00:00:55,759
that we're dealing with when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein.

16
00:00:56,119 --> 00:00:59,000
So today we have an article from cybernews dot com

17
00:01:00,119 --> 00:01:04,000
the headline Epstein files compromised by a foreign hacker who

18
00:01:04,079 --> 00:01:08,840
breached the FBI. This article was originally published by Reuters.

19
00:01:12,280 --> 00:01:15,120
The details of who access to server at the FBI's

20
00:01:15,159 --> 00:01:18,519
New York Field office, including the allegation that a foreign

21
00:01:18,519 --> 00:01:21,719
hacker was involved are being reported for the first time.

22
00:01:22,599 --> 00:01:25,879
In a statement, the FBI said, what it described as

23
00:01:25,920 --> 00:01:28,920
a cyber incident was an isolated one. Oh well, in

24
00:01:28,959 --> 00:01:32,719
that case, folks, everything's okay. It was just an isolated incident.

25
00:01:32,959 --> 00:01:38,040
Do they think we're stupid? If this was targeted and

26
00:01:38,079 --> 00:01:40,959
they were looking for certain documents, all they needed was

27
00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:44,879
an isolated incident. They didn't need to have access to

28
00:01:44,920 --> 00:01:47,920
the server for months on end. If they were looking

29
00:01:47,959 --> 00:01:52,079
for specific files or specific information, all they needed was

30
00:01:52,120 --> 00:01:55,560
an isolated incident. So the question should be what did

31
00:01:55,560 --> 00:01:59,040
they access, what files, what did they take? Did they

32
00:01:59,079 --> 00:02:03,439
change anything? We need a full accounting of that. The

33
00:02:03,480 --> 00:02:07,959
FBI restricted access to the malicious actor and rectified the network.

34
00:02:08,360 --> 00:02:11,560
The investigation remains ongoing, so we do not have further

35
00:02:11,599 --> 00:02:14,919
comments to provide at this time. Oh, of course, another

36
00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:19,960
ongoing investigation. God forbid they give us any information about

37
00:02:19,960 --> 00:02:25,360
anything ever. But one thing we do know is that

38
00:02:25,400 --> 00:02:29,599
this server was breached and this information was accessed by

39
00:02:29,680 --> 00:02:33,120
a malicious actor. And considering how many pies Jeffrey Epstein

40
00:02:33,159 --> 00:02:36,039
had his hands in around the world, it could be anybody.

41
00:02:36,439 --> 00:02:41,840
Masad Russia fucking China. Who knows, honestly at this point,

42
00:02:41,879 --> 00:02:46,039
who knows? Epstein was so intertwined with people that it

43
00:02:46,080 --> 00:02:48,560
could be anybody? And of course we can't rule out

44
00:02:48,919 --> 00:02:52,120
our own CIA what they can't make it look like

45
00:02:52,159 --> 00:02:54,560
it was a foreign actor doing this. Come on, we

46
00:02:54,599 --> 00:02:56,719
all know the truth, and as far as I'm concerned,

47
00:02:56,759 --> 00:02:59,319
the CIA sure has a lot to hide when it

48
00:02:59,360 --> 00:03:03,319
comes to their life relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. If you

49
00:03:03,439 --> 00:03:06,520
think the CIA was not aware of Epstein, didn't know

50
00:03:06,520 --> 00:03:10,240
who Epstein was, wasn't in bed with Epstein, I really

51
00:03:10,240 --> 00:03:15,400
don't know what to tell you. Although the source said

52
00:03:15,400 --> 00:03:17,960
the intrusion appeared to be carried out by a cyber

53
00:03:18,000 --> 00:03:21,800
criminal rather than a foreign government, the incident underscores the

54
00:03:21,840 --> 00:03:26,360
files potential intelligence value. One academic said, well, there's no

55
00:03:26,400 --> 00:03:29,120
doubt there's a ton of intelligence value there. So it

56
00:03:29,159 --> 00:03:34,840
really makes me wonder why it wasn't protected better. You

57
00:03:34,919 --> 00:03:37,680
mean to tell me the FBI can't safeguard this information

58
00:03:38,400 --> 00:03:41,599
in a manner that can't be accessed by foreign actors.

59
00:03:41,960 --> 00:03:44,400
Or could it be that the FBI knows exactly who

60
00:03:44,439 --> 00:03:47,080
did this and they plan on looking the other way

61
00:03:47,280 --> 00:03:51,000
and sweeping it under the rug. Again. We can't rule

62
00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:53,039
anything out. And I wish I could sit here and

63
00:03:53,080 --> 00:03:56,159
tell you that I trust the DOJ or the FBI

64
00:03:56,680 --> 00:04:00,919
or anybody in power, But I don't because for years

65
00:04:00,919 --> 00:04:04,879
and years and years they've taken a dump on us,

66
00:04:05,560 --> 00:04:07,240
So why should I give them the benefit of the

67
00:04:07,280 --> 00:04:13,960
doubt in a situation like this. The legally mandated publication

68
00:04:14,039 --> 00:04:18,160
of US Justice Department documents has exposed the dead financiers

69
00:04:18,519 --> 00:04:23,240
ties to prominent people in politics, finance, academia, and business,

70
00:04:23,839 --> 00:04:29,560
triggering investigations in numerous countries around the world. Who wouldn't

71
00:04:29,600 --> 00:04:32,560
be going after the Epstein files if you're the Russians

72
00:04:32,759 --> 00:04:36,680
or somebody interested in compromont said John Lindsay, who researches

73
00:04:36,720 --> 00:04:40,439
the role of emerging technology and global security at the

74
00:04:40,519 --> 00:04:45,240
Georgia Institute of Technology. If foreign intelligence agencies are not

75
00:04:45,319 --> 00:04:48,720
thinking seriously about the Epstein files as a target, then

76
00:04:48,759 --> 00:04:51,680
I would be shocked. Well, I agree with them. There

77
00:04:52,079 --> 00:04:54,920
there's no doubt that it looks like a juicy target

78
00:04:55,199 --> 00:04:58,199
for foreign intelligence. I mean, can you imagine the treasure

79
00:04:58,240 --> 00:05:01,240
trove of information the FBI has when it comes to

80
00:05:01,279 --> 00:05:04,160
Jeffrey Epstein. I mean, you have to know your employees right.

81
00:05:06,360 --> 00:05:10,639
The breach was reported contemporaneously by CNN and Reuters. On

82
00:05:11,000 --> 00:05:14,759
February seventeenth, The connection to Epstein material was made by

83
00:05:14,800 --> 00:05:18,680
the French magazine Mary Anne. Yo, that's the whole last problem.

84
00:05:19,920 --> 00:05:23,639
Why aren't our media services here in America putting two

85
00:05:23,680 --> 00:05:27,199
and two together. Why aren't they building the case. Why

86
00:05:27,199 --> 00:05:30,279
aren't they bringing their findings to the American people. Why

87
00:05:30,319 --> 00:05:34,959
aren't they holding the administration accountable? Why is it that

88
00:05:35,120 --> 00:05:40,000
a foreign news outlet called Mary Anne breaks this story?

89
00:05:40,160 --> 00:05:43,279
How is that even possible? I'll tell you why. Because

90
00:05:43,279 --> 00:05:45,639
they still don't get it, they still don't care, and

91
00:05:45,720 --> 00:05:48,439
a lot of them are still running cover for the

92
00:05:48,439 --> 00:05:52,120
people that enabled and co conspired with Jeffrey Epstein. The

93
00:05:52,199 --> 00:05:56,120
legacy media has done a fantastic job when it comes

94
00:05:56,120 --> 00:06:00,240
to covering up for Jeffrey Epstein. But now now they'll

95
00:06:00,240 --> 00:06:02,759
tell you that they're the heroes. They were the shining

96
00:06:02,839 --> 00:06:06,079
light in the darkness, and without the legacy media, we'd

97
00:06:06,079 --> 00:06:08,600
have none of this information. But the truth is, the

98
00:06:08,680 --> 00:06:11,879
legacy media has just piggybacked off the work of other

99
00:06:11,959 --> 00:06:15,560
people and now they're acting like they care all of

100
00:06:15,560 --> 00:06:20,199
a sudden, But before they couldn't be bothered. Have we

101
00:06:20,240 --> 00:06:23,399
forgotten about ABC? Have we forgotten about all these outlets

102
00:06:23,519 --> 00:06:25,920
that call this a conspiracy theory? And look, it's not

103
00:06:25,959 --> 00:06:30,079
only the legacy media. You have a lot of these people, podcasters, etc.

104
00:06:30,800 --> 00:06:33,160
Who are on the left who had no time for

105
00:06:33,240 --> 00:06:36,360
Jeffrey Epstein previously, but now all of a sudden, that's

106
00:06:36,399 --> 00:06:39,000
all they talk about. And the vast majority of them,

107
00:06:39,360 --> 00:06:41,839
I hate to say, have no idea what they're even

108
00:06:41,879 --> 00:06:44,920
talking about. And it's in that confusion that a cover

109
00:06:45,079 --> 00:06:48,199
up like this thrives. The more confusion, the better. The

110
00:06:48,279 --> 00:06:51,600
less cohesiveness the better. The more the people are at

111
00:06:51,639 --> 00:06:54,199
odds with each other, the better. And I don't know

112
00:06:54,240 --> 00:06:56,720
about you, but I'm tired of marching to their tune.

113
00:06:56,959 --> 00:06:59,600
In fact, they want this to be a parade like March,

114
00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:05,720
but instead what they're going to get is a mosh pit. Epstein,

115
00:07:05,759 --> 00:07:09,439
a longtime associate of President Donald Trump, pleaded guilty in

116
00:07:09,439 --> 00:07:13,120
two thousand and eight to prostitution charges, including soliciting an

117
00:07:13,199 --> 00:07:16,199
underage girl. He was found hanged in his jail cell

118
00:07:16,319 --> 00:07:19,800
in twenty nineteen and what was ruled to suicide after

119
00:07:19,839 --> 00:07:23,959
being arrested again on federal charges of sex trafficking miners,

120
00:07:24,959 --> 00:07:27,720
and as you all know, I have my doubts about that,

121
00:07:28,360 --> 00:07:30,680
and that's why we're spending so much time on these

122
00:07:30,680 --> 00:07:34,519
OIG interviews with people that were there the night Epstein died.

123
00:07:34,839 --> 00:07:37,519
And I think it's very apparent that we're not getting

124
00:07:37,519 --> 00:07:41,800
the whole truth. The hack occurred after a server at

125
00:07:41,800 --> 00:07:45,480
the Child Exploitation Forensic Lab in the FBI's New York

126
00:07:45,480 --> 00:07:50,319
Field office was inadvertently left vulnerable by Special Agent Aaron Spivak,

127
00:07:50,759 --> 00:07:53,839
who was trying to navigate the bureau's complex procedure for

128
00:07:53,920 --> 00:07:58,000
handling digital evidence. According to the source and the documents,

129
00:07:58,879 --> 00:08:02,319
hell of a job, mister speak. Has anybody checked his

130
00:08:02,399 --> 00:08:06,639
bank account? Was he paid to leave this doorway open?

131
00:08:07,000 --> 00:08:09,160
And again, look, I don't know. I'm not saying that

132
00:08:09,199 --> 00:08:12,879
he did. I'm asking about the investigation, right, And I

133
00:08:12,959 --> 00:08:16,279
think we've learned over the years that we have to

134
00:08:16,319 --> 00:08:19,040
ask all these questions. I know we shouldn't have to

135
00:08:19,040 --> 00:08:21,360
ask them, it should just be second nature for a

136
00:08:21,399 --> 00:08:25,279
real investigation. But this is not a real investigation, so

137
00:08:25,480 --> 00:08:27,480
of course we have to hold our feet to the fire.

138
00:08:28,959 --> 00:08:32,080
A timeline written by Spivac and included in the large

139
00:08:32,080 --> 00:08:35,200
cash of Epstein documents released earlier this year, said the

140
00:08:35,200 --> 00:08:39,240
breaking happened on February twelfth, twenty twenty three. It was

141
00:08:39,279 --> 00:08:42,320
discovered the following day when Spivac turned on his computer

142
00:08:42,759 --> 00:08:45,639
and discovered a text file warning them that his network

143
00:08:45,679 --> 00:08:49,919
had been compromised. Well, according to that document, further investigation

144
00:08:50,039 --> 00:08:53,120
turned up traces of unusual activity on the server, the

145
00:08:53,200 --> 00:08:57,799
document said, adding that the activity included combing through certain

146
00:08:57,799 --> 00:09:03,200
files pertaining to the Epstein investment mitigation. Well, isn't that nice? Huh?

147
00:09:03,320 --> 00:09:05,720
I wonder what they had access to, what they got

148
00:09:06,120 --> 00:09:08,840
and what was destroyed, because what you think they just

149
00:09:08,879 --> 00:09:13,720
took a look? Highly doubt that. Further investigation turned up

150
00:09:13,720 --> 00:09:17,240
traces of unusual activity on the server, the document said,

151
00:09:17,600 --> 00:09:21,720
adding that the activity included combing through certain files pertaining

152
00:09:21,919 --> 00:09:25,679
to the Epstein investigation. The timeline does not say which

153
00:09:25,720 --> 00:09:29,559
specific files were accessed, whether the hacker downloaded the data,

154
00:09:30,120 --> 00:09:33,639
or who the hacker was. Reuters could not establish what,

155
00:09:34,000 --> 00:09:38,120
if any overlap the affected data had with the Epstein

156
00:09:38,159 --> 00:09:42,200
documents published earlier this year, or the files that remained

157
00:09:42,559 --> 00:09:46,159
under wraps. We need a full accounting of this. What

158
00:09:46,279 --> 00:09:49,840
went down, how did it happen? And what's the report? Right?

159
00:09:50,279 --> 00:09:54,159
Congress needs to get involved here. I mean, this isn't

160
00:09:54,159 --> 00:09:58,120
setting off red flags and alert bells for everybody else, Like,

161
00:09:58,200 --> 00:10:01,559
what are we doing here? Vivak, whose name appears elsewhere

162
00:10:01,600 --> 00:10:05,000
in the documents in connection with the Epstein investigation, did

163
00:10:05,000 --> 00:10:09,720
not return repeated messages seeking comment. Reuters was unable to

164
00:10:09,759 --> 00:10:13,000
reach the man identified in the documents as Spivak's lawyer,

165
00:10:13,279 --> 00:10:19,080
Richard J. Roberson Junior, and seven FBI agents identified in

166
00:10:19,080 --> 00:10:22,480
the documents as being involved in the investigation into the

167
00:10:22,519 --> 00:10:27,120
incident did not return messages. This is wholly unacceptable. The

168
00:10:27,240 --> 00:10:31,120
FBI needs to provide clarity on this, what happened, when

169
00:10:31,159 --> 00:10:34,320
it happened, and where we are in the investigation now.

170
00:10:37,360 --> 00:10:40,679
In his statement to FBI investigators examining whether he was

171
00:10:40,759 --> 00:10:43,840
responsible for the breach, Spivak said he was being made

172
00:10:43,840 --> 00:10:47,159
a scapegoat for the intrusion and that the conflicting bureau

173
00:10:47,240 --> 00:10:51,200
policies and faulty guidance around information technology were to blame.

174
00:10:51,879 --> 00:10:56,279
Reuters cannot establish the result of the bureau's internal investigation.

175
00:10:57,320 --> 00:11:00,799
Probably the same as usual, nothing happens. Oh, don't do

176
00:11:00,840 --> 00:11:04,799
that again, mister Spivak. Meanwhile, the damage is already done.

177
00:11:05,279 --> 00:11:08,000
The person familiar with the breach said the intrusion was

178
00:11:08,039 --> 00:11:10,440
carried out by a foreign hacker who did not appear

179
00:11:10,480 --> 00:11:14,120
to realize they had penetrated a law enforcement server. The

180
00:11:14,159 --> 00:11:17,600
hacker expressed disgust at the presence of child abuse images

181
00:11:17,840 --> 00:11:20,639
on the device and left a message threatening to turn

182
00:11:20,679 --> 00:11:24,279
its owner over to the FBI, the person said. The

183
00:11:24,320 --> 00:11:28,200
source said the bureau officials diffuse the situation by convincing

184
00:11:28,240 --> 00:11:31,559
the hacker that they actually were the FBI, in part

185
00:11:31,559 --> 00:11:34,039
by having the hacker joined a video chat where they

186
00:11:34,080 --> 00:11:37,320
flashed their law enforcement credentials in front of a web camera.

187
00:11:38,080 --> 00:11:43,279
What what in the hell's going on here? And mind you,

188
00:11:43,360 --> 00:11:46,799
this is twenty twenty three, so let's not forget this

189
00:11:46,960 --> 00:11:50,960
was that idiot Merrick Garland's DJ, and boy were they

190
00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:53,159
a bunch of boobs? Oh, let's have a video chat

191
00:11:53,159 --> 00:11:56,000
with a hacker. Here's an idea, how about you send

192
00:11:56,039 --> 00:12:02,039
a Tomahawk missile through his window. Many of the Justice

193
00:12:02,080 --> 00:12:05,679
Department's documents have been heavily redacted, and others have been

194
00:12:05,720 --> 00:12:09,360
kept secret altogether, despite a law mandating their full release.

195
00:12:09,440 --> 00:12:13,480
Last year, the Trump administration says it's withholding material that

196
00:12:13,519 --> 00:12:19,159
could compromise victims identities or jeopardize ongoing investigations. Well, we

197
00:12:19,200 --> 00:12:22,480
know there's no ongoing investigations, and we know they don't

198
00:12:22,480 --> 00:12:26,000
care about people's identities considering how shitty they've been when

199
00:12:26,000 --> 00:12:28,480
it comes to concealing them. So really, what they're doing

200
00:12:28,720 --> 00:12:30,600
is just giving all of us the middle finger. Right,

201
00:12:31,120 --> 00:12:33,600
you're not getting these documents and there's nothing you can

202
00:12:33,639 --> 00:12:36,360
do about it. Oh and by the way, did you

203
00:12:36,399 --> 00:12:39,519
hear that a hacker hacked our shit and was perusing

204
00:12:39,919 --> 00:12:43,639
our Epstein files? Yeah, but no big deal. We don't

205
00:12:43,639 --> 00:12:46,440
need to alert anybody about that. No committee needs to

206
00:12:46,480 --> 00:12:49,039
be held over that. We don't need to have any

207
00:12:49,159 --> 00:12:52,600
kind of public answers for that. Can somebody tell me

208
00:12:52,639 --> 00:12:55,919
again why I should trust the DOJ or the FBI,

209
00:12:56,440 --> 00:12:58,799
because I can't come up with a reason at this point,

210
00:12:59,279 --> 00:13:01,559
and it seems like every time we turn around, they're

211
00:13:01,600 --> 00:13:04,120
giving us another reason not to trust them. And when

212
00:13:04,120 --> 00:13:06,679
we hear about situations like this, it just slams that

213
00:13:06,759 --> 00:13:10,039
point home. So obviously Congress needs to get involved here,

214
00:13:10,360 --> 00:13:14,399
and they need to subpoena mister Spivak and anybody else

215
00:13:14,440 --> 00:13:17,159
involved and of course that's what would happen if this

216
00:13:17,279 --> 00:13:20,759
was a real investigation. But considering it's nothing more than

217
00:13:20,799 --> 00:13:23,679
political theater, I would suggest that you get comfortable now

218
00:13:23,720 --> 00:13:26,279
with the fact that we're never going to know anything

219
00:13:26,320 --> 00:13:29,960
really about this hack and who was involved. So let's

220
00:13:30,000 --> 00:13:32,120
see where this all goes, and let's see what kind

221
00:13:32,159 --> 00:13:34,679
of information we end up getting. But I have my

222
00:13:34,799 --> 00:13:37,240
doubts if we're ever going to get any clarity here,

223
00:13:38,360 --> 00:13:40,279
So we'll keep an eye on it, and when we

224
00:13:40,320 --> 00:13:42,159
do have some more information one way or the other,

225
00:13:42,720 --> 00:13:47,039
we'll make sure to update the catalog. As for this one, well,

226
00:13:47,120 --> 00:13:49,600
that's going to do it. All the information that goes

227
00:13:49,639 --> 00:13:53,360
with this episode can be found in the description box.

