WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.399 --> 00:00:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bedtime Astronomy. Explore the wonders of the cosmos

2
00:00:07.759 --> 00:00:12.279
<v Speaker 1>with our soothing Bedtime Astronomie podcast. Each episode offers a

3
00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>gentle journey through the stars, planets, and beyond, perfect for

4
00:00:16.399 --> 00:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>unwinding after a long day. Let's travel through the mysteries

5
00:00:20.239 --> 00:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of the universe as you drift off into a peaceful

6
00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:23.839
<v Speaker 1>slumber under the night sky.

7
00:00:26.879 --> 00:00:29.160
<v Speaker 2>I want you to imagine, just for a second, that

8
00:00:29.239 --> 00:00:32.039
<v Speaker 2>you're standing on a beach and you're staring out at

9
00:00:32.039 --> 00:00:34.119
<v Speaker 2>this vast, churning ocean.

10
00:00:34.200 --> 00:00:35.439
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm picturing it.

11
00:00:35.439 --> 00:00:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, But there's a catch. You can't actually see the

12
00:00:38.359 --> 00:00:39.719
<v Speaker 2>water like at all.

13
00:00:39.920 --> 00:00:40.119
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

14
00:00:40.200 --> 00:00:42.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the ocean is completely invisible. The only thing you

15
00:00:42.759 --> 00:00:46.719
<v Speaker 2>can actually see is the sea foam right on the surface,

16
00:00:47.000 --> 00:00:48.280
<v Speaker 2>just floating there in midair.

17
00:00:48.399 --> 00:00:52.039
<v Speaker 3>That is a deeply unsettling mental image, I know.

18
00:00:52.119 --> 00:00:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, But that's essentially the reality of the universe you're

19
00:00:55.200 --> 00:00:58.159
<v Speaker 2>sitting in right now. Like everything you can see, your hands,

20
00:00:58.159 --> 00:01:00.600
<v Speaker 2>the room, you're in, the stars, and the night sky,

21
00:01:01.159 --> 00:01:02.439
<v Speaker 2>that's just the sea foam.

22
00:01:02.520 --> 00:01:05.000
<v Speaker 3>The visible debris, exactly.

23
00:01:04.719 --> 00:01:08.400
<v Speaker 2>The visible debris. And today we're going to talk about

24
00:01:08.760 --> 00:01:13.319
<v Speaker 2>the invisible ocean, the dark matter, and more importantly, what

25
00:01:13.400 --> 00:01:16.239
<v Speaker 2>happens when the most extreme objects in the universe violently

26
00:01:16.280 --> 00:01:18.439
<v Speaker 2>collide inside that invisible ocean.

27
00:01:18.719 --> 00:01:22.079
<v Speaker 3>And honestly, the methodology we're looking at today is it's

28
00:01:22.159 --> 00:01:24.519
<v Speaker 3>just a brilliant shift in how we approach this.

29
00:01:24.719 --> 00:01:26.599
<v Speaker 2>It really is. I mean, we're talking about a completely

30
00:01:26.640 --> 00:01:28.560
<v Speaker 2>new way of looking at data we already.

31
00:01:28.280 --> 00:01:32.799
<v Speaker 3>Have, right because for decades the astrophysics community has been

32
00:01:32.840 --> 00:01:37.079
<v Speaker 3>trying to build these massive, ultra sensitive particle detectors to

33
00:01:37.159 --> 00:01:38.239
<v Speaker 3>catch dark matter.

34
00:01:38.120 --> 00:01:40.439
<v Speaker 2>And catching exactly zero particles.

35
00:01:40.159 --> 00:01:43.439
<v Speaker 3>Right, pretty much. Yeah, But this new framework developed by

36
00:01:43.439 --> 00:01:49.079
<v Speaker 3>this incredible coalition of physicists from MIT, Eucluvane, University of Amsterdam,

37
00:01:49.359 --> 00:01:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Queen Mary University, and Oxford, it completely discards.

38
00:01:54.640 --> 00:01:56.319
<v Speaker 2>The particle detector, which is wild.

39
00:01:56.560 --> 00:02:00.560
<v Speaker 3>It is they are using gravitational waves, the literal ripples

40
00:02:00.560 --> 00:02:03.200
<v Speaker 3>in the fabric of space and time to feel the

41
00:02:03.280 --> 00:02:04.719
<v Speaker 3>drag of dark matter.

42
00:02:04.519 --> 00:02:06.159
<v Speaker 2>Which just sounds like pure science fiction.

43
00:02:06.359 --> 00:02:08.560
<v Speaker 3>It does, but it's happening, and the elegance of it

44
00:02:08.599 --> 00:02:11.719
<v Speaker 3>lies in the math. It's a highly sophisticated way of

45
00:02:11.759 --> 00:02:15.240
<v Speaker 3>predicting how the most extreme gravitational environments in the universe

46
00:02:15.479 --> 00:02:16.840
<v Speaker 3>interact with the dark sector.

47
00:02:16.879 --> 00:02:18.919
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so let's unpack this, Yeah, because I want to

48
00:02:18.919 --> 00:02:20.439
<v Speaker 2>make sure we're all on the same page before we

49
00:02:20.479 --> 00:02:23.400
<v Speaker 2>get to colliding black holes. It is. So, we have

50
00:02:23.479 --> 00:02:27.080
<v Speaker 2>this dark matter, and the accepted number is that it

51
00:02:27.120 --> 00:02:29.120
<v Speaker 2>makes up something like eighty five percent of all the

52
00:02:29.120 --> 00:02:30.240
<v Speaker 2>matter in the universe.

53
00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:31.719
<v Speaker 3>Right right, roughly eighty five percent.

54
00:02:31.919 --> 00:02:33.879
<v Speaker 2>Okay, But if I'm playing Devil's advocate here, if this

55
00:02:33.919 --> 00:02:38.199
<v Speaker 2>stuff is completely invisible, if it totally ignores light passes

56
00:02:38.280 --> 00:02:41.719
<v Speaker 2>right through magnets, passes through the Earth, passes through us,

57
00:02:41.960 --> 00:02:47.159
<v Speaker 2>how on Earth are physicists so incredibly confident that it's

58
00:02:47.199 --> 00:02:48.560
<v Speaker 2>eighty five percent of everything.

59
00:02:48.599 --> 00:02:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, what's fascinating here is that the universe gives us

60
00:02:51.199 --> 00:02:54.360
<v Speaker 3>a scale that we just can't ignore. We can't see it,

61
00:02:54.400 --> 00:02:56.199
<v Speaker 3>but we can definitely feel its weight.

62
00:02:56.520 --> 00:02:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Like a ghost in a haunted house. Uh kind of Yeah,

63
00:02:59.120 --> 00:03:00.919
<v Speaker 2>you can't see the ghost walking through the wall, but

64
00:03:00.960 --> 00:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>you hear the floorboards creaking under its boots.

65
00:03:03.560 --> 00:03:06.680
<v Speaker 3>That's actually, that's a really good analogy. The creaking floorboards

66
00:03:06.680 --> 00:03:09.560
<v Speaker 3>in this case is gravity, right. Gravity is our only

67
00:03:09.599 --> 00:03:12.639
<v Speaker 3>tool to catch it right now. So when astronomers look

68
00:03:12.680 --> 00:03:17.919
<v Speaker 3>at say, distant galaxies, they see the light from those galaxies.

69
00:03:17.360 --> 00:03:19.639
<v Speaker 2>Bend standing around something in the foreground.

70
00:03:19.240 --> 00:03:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, bending around massive invisible structures. We call this gravitational

71
00:03:24.199 --> 00:03:25.280
<v Speaker 3>lensing because.

72
00:03:25.000 --> 00:03:26.879
<v Speaker 2>The gravity is literally acting like.

73
00:03:26.840 --> 00:03:31.759
<v Speaker 3>A glass lens precisely. General relativity tells us that mass

74
00:03:32.000 --> 00:03:35.520
<v Speaker 3>bends space time. So when light from a distant galaxy

75
00:03:35.639 --> 00:03:38.840
<v Speaker 3>travels past a massive object, it's path.

76
00:03:38.639 --> 00:03:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Curves, and we can measure that curve.

77
00:03:40.759 --> 00:03:43.680
<v Speaker 3>We can, And when we calculate the mass required to

78
00:03:43.719 --> 00:03:45.439
<v Speaker 3>bend the light that much, and then we add up

79
00:03:45.439 --> 00:03:48.479
<v Speaker 3>all the visible stars and gas in that area, the

80
00:03:48.520 --> 00:03:50.039
<v Speaker 3>math just doesn't work.

81
00:03:50.120 --> 00:03:52.759
<v Speaker 2>There's not an invisible stuff, not even close.

82
00:03:52.919 --> 00:03:55.840
<v Speaker 3>There has to be a massive invisible force pulling on

83
00:03:55.960 --> 00:03:59.080
<v Speaker 3>that light, and it has to be huge, Hence the

84
00:03:59.280 --> 00:03:59.879
<v Speaker 3>eighty five.

85
00:04:00.879 --> 00:04:03.199
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we know the ghost is heavy, we know

86
00:04:03.240 --> 00:04:07.080
<v Speaker 2>it's there, right, But the astrophysics community has been chasing

87
00:04:07.280 --> 00:04:09.879
<v Speaker 2>a very specific kind of ghost for a long time,

88
00:04:09.960 --> 00:04:12.159
<v Speaker 2>haven't they, Like the wimp.

89
00:04:12.400 --> 00:04:15.879
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the weekly interacting Massive particle WHIMS have been the

90
00:04:15.919 --> 00:04:17.680
<v Speaker 3>favored candidate for decades.

91
00:04:17.720 --> 00:04:20.839
<v Speaker 2>But this new research, the MIT team, they're pivoting away

92
00:04:20.839 --> 00:04:23.079
<v Speaker 2>from WHIMS completely, right. Yeah, they're looking at something called

93
00:04:23.079 --> 00:04:24.639
<v Speaker 2>a light scaler particle.

94
00:04:24.319 --> 00:04:28.000
<v Speaker 3>They are, Yeah, and that pivot is largely driven by well.

95
00:04:27.959 --> 00:04:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Frustration, frustration with the empty particle detector.

96
00:04:31.040 --> 00:04:34.439
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. We've built these incredibly sensitive underground vats filled with

97
00:04:34.519 --> 00:04:35.600
<v Speaker 3>liquid xenon.

98
00:04:35.800 --> 00:04:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Deep underground to shield them from cosmic rays and stuff, right.

99
00:04:39.680 --> 00:04:42.279
<v Speaker 3>And we wait for a massive wimp to just bump

100
00:04:42.279 --> 00:04:45.519
<v Speaker 3>into a xenon nucleus and produce the tiny flash of light.

101
00:04:45.759 --> 00:04:47.399
<v Speaker 2>But no flashes, no flashes.

102
00:04:47.680 --> 00:04:52.839
<v Speaker 3>The detectors are remarkably quiet. So theoretical physics has to adapt.

103
00:04:53.480 --> 00:04:57.360
<v Speaker 3>We have to explore other candidates that still fit the

104
00:04:57.399 --> 00:05:02.040
<v Speaker 3>macroscopic gravity data, the lensing, the alexy rotation, but maybe

105
00:05:02.040 --> 00:05:04.120
<v Speaker 3>behave totally differently on a quantum level.

106
00:05:04.319 --> 00:05:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Enter the light scalar particle.

107
00:05:05.759 --> 00:05:08.759
<v Speaker 3>Enter the light scaler. So, in quantum mechanics, particles have

108
00:05:08.839 --> 00:05:12.759
<v Speaker 3>this property called spin, its intrinsic angular momentum.

109
00:05:12.839 --> 00:05:14.399
<v Speaker 2>Right, like an electron has a half spin.

110
00:05:14.600 --> 00:05:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, photons have a spin of one, but a scaler

111
00:05:17.720 --> 00:05:20.199
<v Speaker 3>particle has a spin of exactly zero Okay.

112
00:05:20.120 --> 00:05:22.439
<v Speaker 2>Meaning it doesn't have a built in direction exactly.

113
00:05:22.600 --> 00:05:25.040
<v Speaker 3>The only fundamental scalar particle we've ever found is.

114
00:05:25.000 --> 00:05:27.800
<v Speaker 2>The Higgs boson, which gives mass to everything.

115
00:05:27.959 --> 00:05:31.079
<v Speaker 3>Right, But the crucial variable here isn't just the zero spin.

116
00:05:31.279 --> 00:05:32.839
<v Speaker 3>It's the prefix light.

117
00:05:32.959 --> 00:05:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Because they are incredibly, almost incomprehensibly light.

118
00:05:36.439 --> 00:05:40.279
<v Speaker 3>We are talking billions of times lighter than a single electron,

119
00:05:40.680 --> 00:05:42.839
<v Speaker 3>down to fractions of an electron volt.

120
00:05:42.959 --> 00:05:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, wait, if they are that small, how do they

121
00:05:46.480 --> 00:05:50.079
<v Speaker 2>make up eighty five percent of the universe. There must

122
00:05:50.120 --> 00:05:52.519
<v Speaker 2>be an unfathomable number of them there are.

123
00:05:52.759 --> 00:05:56.920
<v Speaker 3>And what's fascinating here is how ultra light masses force

124
00:05:57.040 --> 00:06:01.040
<v Speaker 3>us to confront wave particle durality at an aca strophysical scale.

125
00:06:01.120 --> 00:06:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, okay, quantum mechanics on a massive scale.

126
00:06:03.800 --> 00:06:07.319
<v Speaker 3>Right. Because of quantum mechanics, every particle has a wavelength

127
00:06:07.399 --> 00:06:12.040
<v Speaker 3>of de Brogli wavelength. Sure, heavy particles have tiny wavelengths,

128
00:06:12.160 --> 00:06:15.600
<v Speaker 3>so they act like little localized billiard balls. But if

129
00:06:15.639 --> 00:06:18.399
<v Speaker 3>you take a particle that is absurdly light, like ten

130
00:06:18.439 --> 00:06:22.560
<v Speaker 3>to the minus ten electron volts, its quantum wavelength stretches

131
00:06:22.600 --> 00:06:24.199
<v Speaker 3>out immensely.

132
00:06:23.720 --> 00:06:25.600
<v Speaker 2>How immensely like across a room.

133
00:06:25.720 --> 00:06:29.079
<v Speaker 3>We're talking meters, kilometers, maybe even astronomical distances.

134
00:06:29.199 --> 00:06:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Wait, a single particle's quantum field stretches for kilometers exactly.

135
00:06:33.079 --> 00:06:35.759
<v Speaker 3>And because these are scalar bosons, they don't obey the

136
00:06:35.800 --> 00:06:37.720
<v Speaker 3>poly exclusion principle.

137
00:06:37.360 --> 00:06:38.959
<v Speaker 2>Meaning they can share the same space.

138
00:06:39.079 --> 00:06:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Right, you can pack an infinite number of them into

139
00:06:41.279 --> 00:06:42.199
<v Speaker 3>the exact same.

140
00:06:42.079 --> 00:06:44.439
<v Speaker 2>Quantum state, so they just stack on top of each other.

141
00:06:44.600 --> 00:06:47.759
<v Speaker 3>They overlap perfectly, so instead of a bunch of individual

142
00:06:47.800 --> 00:06:51.519
<v Speaker 3>discrete particles bouncing around like ping pong balls, they form

143
00:06:51.560 --> 00:06:56.600
<v Speaker 3>this macroscopic quantum state they behave as a single cohesive

144
00:06:57.079 --> 00:06:58.120
<v Speaker 3>oscillating wave.

145
00:06:58.680 --> 00:07:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so our ghost isn't a swarm of bugs. It's

146
00:07:01.839 --> 00:07:03.800
<v Speaker 2>more like a thick, undulating fog.

147
00:07:04.040 --> 00:07:06.079
<v Speaker 3>That's a great way to look at it, a cohesive

148
00:07:06.160 --> 00:07:10.680
<v Speaker 3>classical field, and that fundamentally changes the game for how

149
00:07:10.680 --> 00:07:11.800
<v Speaker 3>we try to detect it.

150
00:07:11.879 --> 00:07:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Right, because a fog isn't going to bump into a

151
00:07:13.680 --> 00:07:16.480
<v Speaker 2>single xenon atom in an underground tank and make a

152
00:07:16.519 --> 00:07:19.319
<v Speaker 2>fly exactly. We need something way bigger. We need to

153
00:07:19.360 --> 00:07:22.600
<v Speaker 2>see how that massive fog interacts with the biggest, heaviest

154
00:07:22.600 --> 00:07:24.920
<v Speaker 2>things in the universe, which brings us to.

155
00:07:24.920 --> 00:07:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Black holes see Ultimate gravitational engines.

156
00:07:27.600 --> 00:07:30.759
<v Speaker 2>Right, And the researchers describe this interaction, this fog hitting

157
00:07:30.959 --> 00:07:34.920
<v Speaker 2>a rapidly spinning black hole as something called super radiance. Yes,

158
00:07:35.600 --> 00:07:37.680
<v Speaker 2>and the analogy that you use in the research is

159
00:07:38.240 --> 00:07:41.720
<v Speaker 2>it's akin to turning cream into butter, which I love.

160
00:07:41.879 --> 00:07:43.560
<v Speaker 3>It's very evocative, it is.

161
00:07:43.879 --> 00:07:46.480
<v Speaker 2>But here's where it gets really interesting for me, because

162
00:07:46.480 --> 00:07:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we usually think of blank holes as these

163
00:07:48.560 --> 00:07:50.519
<v Speaker 2>ultimate vacuum cleaners, right right.

164
00:07:50.360 --> 00:07:51.879
<v Speaker 3>The classic pop science view.

165
00:07:52.160 --> 00:07:55.959
<v Speaker 2>Nothing of STAPs exactly. They just consume everything. So how

166
00:07:56.079 --> 00:07:59.279
<v Speaker 2>on Earth is a black hole acting like a butter churn?

167
00:08:00.480 --> 00:08:04.319
<v Speaker 2>How is it transferring its energy outward to amplify this

168
00:08:04.439 --> 00:08:05.399
<v Speaker 2>dark matter fog.

169
00:08:05.600 --> 00:08:08.399
<v Speaker 3>To understand that, we have to look at the geometry

170
00:08:08.600 --> 00:08:12.519
<v Speaker 3>of a spinning black hole. Okay, it's described mathematically by

171
00:08:12.560 --> 00:08:15.360
<v Speaker 3>the Cerr metric. So a spinning black hole doesn't just

172
00:08:15.399 --> 00:08:18.000
<v Speaker 3>have an event horizon the point of no return, it

173
00:08:18.040 --> 00:08:21.560
<v Speaker 3>also has this region just outside the horizon called the ergosphere.

174
00:08:21.600 --> 00:08:25.040
<v Speaker 2>The ergosphere sounds intense. It is intense because the black

175
00:08:25.079 --> 00:08:28.360
<v Speaker 2>hole is so massive and it's rotating so incredibly fast,

176
00:08:28.839 --> 00:08:31.920
<v Speaker 2>it physically drags the fabric of space time along with.

177
00:08:31.839 --> 00:08:34.120
<v Speaker 3>It, like a spoon stirring thick syrup.

178
00:08:34.200 --> 00:08:37.639
<v Speaker 2>Precisely, that's called frame dragging, and inside the ergosphere, space

179
00:08:37.679 --> 00:08:40.159
<v Speaker 2>time is being dragged around the black hole so violently

180
00:08:40.200 --> 00:08:42.279
<v Speaker 2>that it's literally moving faster than the speed of light.

181
00:08:42.399 --> 00:08:44.559
<v Speaker 3>Faster than light just the space itself right.

182
00:08:44.440 --> 00:08:47.679
<v Speaker 2>Relative to an observer far away. So in that region

183
00:08:47.799 --> 00:08:50.639
<v Speaker 2>it's physically impossible for anything to stand still. Everything has

184
00:08:50.639 --> 00:08:53.519
<v Speaker 2>to co rotate with the black hole. Wow. Okay, so

185
00:08:53.559 --> 00:08:57.080
<v Speaker 2>our dark matter wave, this scaler fog gets drawn into

186
00:08:57.080 --> 00:09:00.559
<v Speaker 2>the gravitational well, yes, it enters the ergosphere that's forced

187
00:09:00.559 --> 00:09:01.600
<v Speaker 2>to spin exactly.

188
00:09:02.080 --> 00:09:04.120
<v Speaker 3>But just getting dragged in a circle doesn't mean the

189
00:09:04.120 --> 00:09:05.039
<v Speaker 3>wave gains.

190
00:09:04.840 --> 00:09:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Energy, right, it's just a long for the ride.

191
00:09:07.200 --> 00:09:10.399
<v Speaker 3>For energy to transfer, we need an extraction mechanism, and

192
00:09:10.440 --> 00:09:12.559
<v Speaker 3>that happens through a wave scattering process.

193
00:09:12.639 --> 00:09:13.759
<v Speaker 2>Okay, break that down for me.

194
00:09:13.919 --> 00:09:17.080
<v Speaker 3>When the incoming scaler wave scatters off the black hole,

195
00:09:17.480 --> 00:09:21.399
<v Speaker 3>a really weird mathematical boundary condition pops up. If the

196
00:09:21.440 --> 00:09:24.559
<v Speaker 3>wave is rotating slower than the black hole itself, the

197
00:09:24.600 --> 00:09:25.360
<v Speaker 3>wave split.

198
00:09:25.519 --> 00:09:26.159
<v Speaker 2>It splits.

199
00:09:26.279 --> 00:09:29.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, a portion of the wave falls into the event horizon.

200
00:09:29.600 --> 00:09:32.639
<v Speaker 2>It's gone, okay, standard black hole behavior.

201
00:09:32.879 --> 00:09:36.559
<v Speaker 3>But because of the extreme physics in the ergosphere, that

202
00:09:36.720 --> 00:09:40.000
<v Speaker 3>infalling piece of the wave can actually have negative energy.

203
00:09:40.080 --> 00:09:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Wait, hold on, negative energy.

204
00:09:41.759 --> 00:09:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Relative to the outside universe.

205
00:09:43.200 --> 00:09:45.919
<v Speaker 2>Yees, Okay, let me just unpack the conservation of energy here.

206
00:09:46.440 --> 00:09:50.679
<v Speaker 2>If the black hole absorbs a wave packet with negative energy.

207
00:09:51.159 --> 00:09:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Then the black hole's overall mass and its rotational energy

208
00:09:55.000 --> 00:09:55.559
<v Speaker 2>have to go down.

209
00:09:55.679 --> 00:09:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yes, the black hole slows down a tiny.

210
00:09:58.200 --> 00:10:02.039
<v Speaker 2>Bit so to balance the cause Ledger, the piece of

211
00:10:02.080 --> 00:10:04.519
<v Speaker 2>the wave that bounces off, the part that scatters away,

212
00:10:05.159 --> 00:10:08.240
<v Speaker 2>has to emerge with more energy than it started with.

213
00:10:08.519 --> 00:10:12.639
<v Speaker 3>The math demands it. The outgoing wave is amplified. It

214
00:10:12.799 --> 00:10:15.600
<v Speaker 3>literally steals rotational energy from the black hole.

215
00:10:15.720 --> 00:10:16.559
<v Speaker 2>That is mind blowing.

216
00:10:16.679 --> 00:10:19.799
<v Speaker 3>It gets better. Here is where the butter churn analogy

217
00:10:20.000 --> 00:10:20.720
<v Speaker 3>really shines.

218
00:10:20.879 --> 00:10:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, hit me.

219
00:10:21.799 --> 00:10:24.240
<v Speaker 3>The wave doesn't just scatter once and fly off into

220
00:10:24.240 --> 00:10:28.240
<v Speaker 3>deep space. The black hole's gravity creates a potential well.

221
00:10:28.840 --> 00:10:31.320
<v Speaker 3>It traps the wave like an orbit, kind of like

222
00:10:31.320 --> 00:10:34.279
<v Speaker 3>how a proton traps an electron in an atom. So

223
00:10:34.559 --> 00:10:38.759
<v Speaker 3>this amplified dark matter wave is stuck. It bounces back

224
00:10:38.799 --> 00:10:42.480
<v Speaker 3>and forth in this gravity well, repeatedly passing through the ergosphere,

225
00:10:43.120 --> 00:10:46.559
<v Speaker 3>and every single time it passes through it extracts more energy.

226
00:10:46.639 --> 00:10:50.559
<v Speaker 3>It gets amplified again. It's exponential. It is a runaway

227
00:10:50.639 --> 00:10:54.159
<v Speaker 3>exponential amplification. The black hole is just dumping its spin

228
00:10:54.279 --> 00:10:56.679
<v Speaker 3>energy into the surrounding dark matter, whipping it up, making

229
00:10:56.679 --> 00:10:58.159
<v Speaker 3>it incredibly.

230
00:10:57.519 --> 00:10:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Dense, turning the cream into butter.

231
00:10:59.279 --> 00:11:01.279
<v Speaker 3>Exactly until it saturates.

232
00:11:01.360 --> 00:11:03.000
<v Speaker 2>When does it saturate, usually.

233
00:11:02.799 --> 00:11:04.759
<v Speaker 3>When the black hole has spun down so much that

234
00:11:04.799 --> 00:11:08.440
<v Speaker 3>it's no longer spinning faster than the wave. At that point,

235
00:11:08.480 --> 00:11:11.799
<v Speaker 3>you're left with what physicists call a bosonic cloud.

236
00:11:11.919 --> 00:11:14.879
<v Speaker 2>A bosonic cloud. Yeah, so instead of just a diffuse

237
00:11:14.879 --> 00:11:19.799
<v Speaker 2>invisible fog, we now have a highly concentrated, super dense

238
00:11:19.840 --> 00:11:23.919
<v Speaker 2>halo of dark matter tightly bound to this black hole.

239
00:11:24.039 --> 00:11:27.279
<v Speaker 3>Orders of magnitude denser than the ambient dark matter in

240
00:11:27.320 --> 00:11:28.000
<v Speaker 3>the galaxy.

241
00:11:28.320 --> 00:11:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Okay, so that is the setup. That's the trap

242
00:11:31.200 --> 00:11:32.720
<v Speaker 2>we're setting for the ghost, right.

243
00:11:32.960 --> 00:11:35.639
<v Speaker 3>But there's a problem. There usually is a single black

244
00:11:35.679 --> 00:11:38.320
<v Speaker 3>hole just sitting there in space with its dense little

245
00:11:38.399 --> 00:11:42.399
<v Speaker 3>dark matter cloud. It doesn't really emit gravitational waves, at

246
00:11:42.440 --> 00:11:44.879
<v Speaker 3>least not ones we can easily detect from Earth.

247
00:11:44.960 --> 00:11:45.759
<v Speaker 2>It's too quiet.

248
00:11:45.840 --> 00:11:48.000
<v Speaker 3>It's too quiet to trigger our detectors. You need a

249
00:11:48.039 --> 00:11:50.879
<v Speaker 3>massive perturbation, you need a cataclysm.

250
00:11:50.279 --> 00:11:53.440
<v Speaker 2>You need a binary system, two black holes crashing into

251
00:11:53.519 --> 00:11:53.840
<v Speaker 2>each other.

252
00:11:54.039 --> 00:11:54.279
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

253
00:11:54.480 --> 00:11:57.360
<v Speaker 2>So this MIT and European team, they set out to

254
00:11:57.399 --> 00:12:00.799
<v Speaker 2>build a predigative model to figure out exactly what it

255
00:12:00.840 --> 00:12:03.519
<v Speaker 2>looks like when two black holes merge, but one of

256
00:12:03.559 --> 00:12:05.440
<v Speaker 2>them or both of them is wrapped in this thick,

257
00:12:05.720 --> 00:12:07.159
<v Speaker 2>heavy butter of dark matter.

258
00:12:07.360 --> 00:12:09.519
<v Speaker 3>And that is not a trivial task I can imagine.

259
00:12:09.559 --> 00:12:12.519
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Einstein's equations are brutal on a good day.

260
00:12:12.399 --> 00:12:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Right, highly complex nonlinear coupled partial differential equations. If we

261
00:12:18.159 --> 00:12:22.519
<v Speaker 3>connect this to the bigger picture of computational astrophysics, just

262
00:12:22.799 --> 00:12:26.840
<v Speaker 3>simulating two black holes colliding in a total vacuum empty

263
00:12:26.879 --> 00:12:32.399
<v Speaker 3>space that took physicists decades to solve. Wait, really decades, decades.

264
00:12:32.799 --> 00:12:36.480
<v Speaker 3>The breakthrough in numerical relativity only happened around two thousand

265
00:12:36.480 --> 00:12:38.679
<v Speaker 3>and five, just to do it in empty space exactly.

266
00:12:38.759 --> 00:12:42.600
<v Speaker 3>So now imagine adding a massive dynamic sloshing cloud of

267
00:12:42.679 --> 00:12:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Scaler particles to that simulation.

268
00:12:44.559 --> 00:12:45.720
<v Speaker 2>The math must be a nightmare.

269
00:12:45.840 --> 00:12:49.799
<v Speaker 3>It introduces immense computational complexity. You have to track the

270
00:12:49.799 --> 00:12:52.159
<v Speaker 3>gravity of the black holes, the rippling of the space

271
00:12:52.200 --> 00:12:54.919
<v Speaker 3>time metric, and the gravitational pull of the dark matter

272
00:12:54.960 --> 00:12:56.240
<v Speaker 3>pulling back on the black holes.

273
00:12:56.559 --> 00:12:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Right, because the dark matter has mass, so it's going

274
00:12:59.000 --> 00:12:59.879
<v Speaker 2>to exert drag.

275
00:13:00.080 --> 00:13:01.440
<v Speaker 3>We call it dynamical friction.

276
00:13:01.639 --> 00:13:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Diamical friction, so paint me a picture. How does that

277
00:13:04.320 --> 00:13:07.559
<v Speaker 2>drag actually play out as they spiral in towards each other.

278
00:13:07.919 --> 00:13:11.399
<v Speaker 3>So imagine the secondary black hole plunging through the dark

279
00:13:11.440 --> 00:13:14.840
<v Speaker 3>matter cloud of the primary black hole. As it moves,

280
00:13:14.919 --> 00:13:17.000
<v Speaker 3>its gravity pulls the dark matter.

281
00:13:16.840 --> 00:13:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Particles toward it, okay, kind of sweeping them up.

282
00:13:19.600 --> 00:13:21.519
<v Speaker 3>Not quite sweeping them up, but pulling them in so

283
00:13:21.600 --> 00:13:25.480
<v Speaker 3>they bunch up behind it. It creates a gravitational.

284
00:13:24.879 --> 00:13:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Wake like a boat moving through water.

285
00:13:27.360 --> 00:13:30.799
<v Speaker 3>Yes, an area of higher density trailing right behind the

286
00:13:30.840 --> 00:13:34.720
<v Speaker 3>moving black hole. And because that wake has mass, its

287
00:13:34.720 --> 00:13:36.919
<v Speaker 3>gravity pulls backward on the black hole.

288
00:13:37.080 --> 00:13:40.279
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, it's literally putting the brakes on exactly.

289
00:13:40.320 --> 00:13:43.559
<v Speaker 3>It bleeds away the black hole's orbital energy and that

290
00:13:43.639 --> 00:13:47.960
<v Speaker 3>fundamentally alters the merger. Oh so well. In a vacuum,

291
00:13:48.360 --> 00:13:52.399
<v Speaker 3>two black holes only lose energy by emitting gravitational waves.

292
00:13:52.799 --> 00:13:56.799
<v Speaker 3>They spiral inward at a very predictable smooth rate. It

293
00:13:56.840 --> 00:13:58.720
<v Speaker 3>produces a signal we call a chirp.

294
00:13:58.799 --> 00:14:01.840
<v Speaker 2>The chirp because the frequency and the amplitude go up

295
00:14:01.879 --> 00:14:03.240
<v Speaker 2>smoothly until they collide.

296
00:14:03.320 --> 00:14:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Right. But when you add dynamical friction from the basonic cloud,

297
00:14:07.200 --> 00:14:10.039
<v Speaker 3>they are losing energy through an extra channel for a drag. Yes,

298
00:14:10.320 --> 00:14:13.159
<v Speaker 3>so they spiral inward faster than they normally would. The

299
00:14:13.320 --> 00:14:15.919
<v Speaker 3>orbital trajectory tightens much faster, so.

300
00:14:15.919 --> 00:14:21.039
<v Speaker 2>The phase of the gravitational wave changes, the chirp is accelerated.

301
00:14:20.440 --> 00:14:23.559
<v Speaker 3>The frequency increases more rapidly. Yes, And it's even more

302
00:14:23.559 --> 00:14:26.600
<v Speaker 3>complicated because the secondary black hole isn't just orbiting the

303
00:14:26.600 --> 00:14:30.279
<v Speaker 3>primary black hole anymore. It's orbiting the combined mass of

304
00:14:30.279 --> 00:14:32.840
<v Speaker 3>the black hole and the dark matter cloud.

305
00:14:33.159 --> 00:14:35.440
<v Speaker 2>So the team had to use supercomputers to solve all

306
00:14:35.440 --> 00:14:35.639
<v Speaker 2>of this.

307
00:14:35.879 --> 00:14:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, they solve the Einstein Klan Gordon equations.

308
00:14:39.240 --> 00:14:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Just casually solving the Einstein Clan Gordon equations as you do.

309
00:14:42.799 --> 00:14:46.279
<v Speaker 3>Right, which govern the scaler field in curved space time.

310
00:14:47.039 --> 00:14:51.200
<v Speaker 3>They ran all these simulations to generate theoretical waveforms, a

311
00:14:51.360 --> 00:14:52.799
<v Speaker 3>vast library of them.

312
00:14:52.879 --> 00:14:54.879
<v Speaker 2>Basically, they built a dictionary.

313
00:14:54.440 --> 00:14:57.200
<v Speaker 3>A dictionary of what a dark matter merger should look like.

314
00:14:57.399 --> 00:15:00.879
<v Speaker 3>They tweets the masses, the density of the cloud, the

315
00:15:00.879 --> 00:15:02.399
<v Speaker 3>mass of the scaler particles.

316
00:15:02.559 --> 00:15:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so what does this all mean for us on Earth?

317
00:15:05.679 --> 00:15:08.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they have this theoretical dictionary, but how do

318
00:15:08.240 --> 00:15:08.799
<v Speaker 2>you test it?

319
00:15:09.159 --> 00:15:11.679
<v Speaker 3>You turn to the actual data. The public archives of

320
00:15:11.720 --> 00:15:14.039
<v Speaker 3>the Lego Virgo Caagra network.

321
00:15:13.679 --> 00:15:16.919
<v Speaker 2>The LVK network, which, for anyone who doesn't know, is

322
00:15:17.080 --> 00:15:20.919
<v Speaker 2>just a global network of massive laser observatories.

323
00:15:20.120 --> 00:15:21.879
<v Speaker 3>The pinnacle of precision measurement.

324
00:15:22.159 --> 00:15:26.360
<v Speaker 2>We're talking lasers bouncing down tunnels that are kilometers long, right.

325
00:15:26.840 --> 00:15:29.720
<v Speaker 3>They are capable of detecting changes in distance on the

326
00:15:29.840 --> 00:15:32.799
<v Speaker 3>order of ten to the minus twenty one meters.

327
00:15:32.600 --> 00:15:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Which is what is that? A fraction of a proton?

328
00:15:35.279 --> 00:15:36.919
<v Speaker 3>A tiny fraction of a proton.

329
00:15:37.120 --> 00:15:38.600
<v Speaker 2>It's just absurd, it is.

330
00:15:39.279 --> 00:15:42.799
<v Speaker 3>Over their first three observing runs, the LVK network detected

331
00:15:42.840 --> 00:15:46.759
<v Speaker 3>nearly one hundred confirmed gravitational wave events.

332
00:15:46.279 --> 00:15:49.039
<v Speaker 2>Nearly one hundred black hole and neutron star collisions.

333
00:15:49.159 --> 00:15:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but the MIT team didn't just use all of them.

334
00:15:52.559 --> 00:15:55.759
<v Speaker 3>They rigorously filtered the data set. They only selected the

335
00:15:55.799 --> 00:15:59.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty eight clearest, most pristine signals.

336
00:15:58.919 --> 00:16:01.559
<v Speaker 2>The gold standard cans. Why only twenty eight? Why not

337
00:16:01.679 --> 00:16:02.679
<v Speaker 2>use all the data?

338
00:16:02.799 --> 00:16:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Because the phase shift we're looking for, this tiny acceleration

339
00:16:06.080 --> 00:16:08.360
<v Speaker 3>in the chirp caused by the dark matter drag, It

340
00:16:08.440 --> 00:16:10.840
<v Speaker 3>is very subtle. Right, If you have a signal that's

341
00:16:10.879 --> 00:16:13.919
<v Speaker 3>buried in instrumental noise, or you know, thermal fluctuations in

342
00:16:13.960 --> 00:16:18.759
<v Speaker 3>the mirrors, or even a tiny seismic vibration that noise

343
00:16:18.759 --> 00:16:20.720
<v Speaker 3>could easily masquerade as a face shift.

344
00:16:20.960 --> 00:16:23.679
<v Speaker 2>H Okay, you'd get a false positive exactly.

345
00:16:24.080 --> 00:16:27.279
<v Speaker 3>By limiting the analysis to the twenty eight highest signal

346
00:16:27.320 --> 00:16:30.639
<v Speaker 3>to noise ratio events, they ensured that any anomaly they

347
00:16:30.759 --> 00:16:34.360
<v Speaker 3>found was likely astrophysical, not just a bumpy laser.

348
00:16:34.519 --> 00:16:37.799
<v Speaker 2>So how did they actually compare their new dictionary to

349
00:16:37.960 --> 00:16:39.399
<v Speaker 2>these twenty eight signals.

350
00:16:39.639 --> 00:16:44.080
<v Speaker 3>They used a technique called matched filtering. Matched filtering, right,

351
00:16:44.080 --> 00:16:47.440
<v Speaker 3>it's standard in this field. You take the incoming noisy

352
00:16:47.519 --> 00:16:50.600
<v Speaker 3>data from the detector and you cross correlate it with

353
00:16:50.679 --> 00:16:52.519
<v Speaker 3>your bank of theoretical templates.

354
00:16:52.559 --> 00:16:54.399
<v Speaker 2>You just slide the template over the data until it

355
00:16:54.440 --> 00:16:54.919
<v Speaker 2>lines up.

356
00:16:55.120 --> 00:16:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Essentially, Yes, if a template matches the signal hidden in

357
00:16:58.360 --> 00:17:00.559
<v Speaker 3>the noise, the cross correlations.

358
00:17:00.080 --> 00:17:01.559
<v Speaker 2>Spikes and you have a match.

359
00:17:01.759 --> 00:17:04.319
<v Speaker 3>Right. So they took these twenty eight pristine in this

360
00:17:04.519 --> 00:17:08.799
<v Speaker 3>and analyzed them twice, once using the standard vacuum template

361
00:17:09.440 --> 00:17:12.720
<v Speaker 3>and once using their brand new dark matter templates.

362
00:17:12.319 --> 00:17:14.680
<v Speaker 2>And they used Bayesian inference to see which one fits

363
00:17:14.720 --> 00:17:17.279
<v Speaker 2>better exact. Okay, this suspense is killing me. What did

364
00:17:17.319 --> 00:17:19.079
<v Speaker 2>they find when they ran the twenty eight candidates?

365
00:17:19.240 --> 00:17:21.559
<v Speaker 3>Well, for twenty seven of the twenty eight candidates. The

366
00:17:21.599 --> 00:17:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Beaesian evidence heavily favored the vacuum model.

367
00:17:24.240 --> 00:17:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so twenty seven of them were just regular black

368
00:17:27.039 --> 00:17:30.039
<v Speaker 2>holes merging in empty space, or at least the dark

369
00:17:30.079 --> 00:17:32.079
<v Speaker 2>matter was too thin to notice.

370
00:17:31.759 --> 00:17:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Right, But one event broke the pattern.

371
00:17:34.039 --> 00:17:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Here we go GW one nine zero seven to two eight.

372
00:17:37.160 --> 00:17:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes, detected on July twenty eighth, twenty nineteen. It was

373
00:17:41.440 --> 00:17:44.160
<v Speaker 3>a merger of two black holes with a combined mass

374
00:17:44.240 --> 00:17:46.079
<v Speaker 3>roughly twenty times that of our son.

375
00:17:46.240 --> 00:17:48.759
<v Speaker 2>Okay, a twenty solar mass collision, and.

376
00:17:48.680 --> 00:17:52.559
<v Speaker 3>The Beaesian analysis of this specific signal showed a preference

377
00:17:52.720 --> 00:17:55.400
<v Speaker 3>for the dark matter model over the vacuum model.

378
00:17:55.160 --> 00:17:58.200
<v Speaker 2>A preference meaning it fit the dark matter dictionary better

379
00:17:58.240 --> 00:17:59.960
<v Speaker 2>than the empty space dictionary exactly.

380
00:18:00.279 --> 00:18:04.400
<v Speaker 3>It exhibited that anomalous phase evolution that slight acceleration in

381
00:18:04.440 --> 00:18:07.680
<v Speaker 3>the chirp that perfectly aligns with the dynamical friction of

382
00:18:07.680 --> 00:18:08.640
<v Speaker 3>a bisonic cloud.

383
00:18:08.799 --> 00:18:10.599
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I have to stop you there because I am

384
00:18:10.640 --> 00:18:13.480
<v Speaker 2>getting incredibly excited. But I also need to play Devil's advocate.

385
00:18:13.559 --> 00:18:15.599
<v Speaker 2>Go for it. If they found a signal that literally

386
00:18:15.640 --> 00:18:19.240
<v Speaker 2>matches the dark matter model, why aren't physicists throwing a

387
00:18:19.279 --> 00:18:22.000
<v Speaker 2>global parade right now? Like, why isn't this front page

388
00:18:22.079 --> 00:18:23.960
<v Speaker 2>news everywhere? Why is it just a preference?

389
00:18:24.240 --> 00:18:28.240
<v Speaker 3>This raises an important question about the threshold of scientific discovery,

390
00:18:28.839 --> 00:18:33.720
<v Speaker 3>and the researchers, particularly show su Arikoetsia from MIT, we're

391
00:18:33.839 --> 00:18:34.680
<v Speaker 3>very very.

392
00:18:34.519 --> 00:18:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Cautious about this because in physics you can't just say

393
00:18:37.720 --> 00:18:38.640
<v Speaker 2>looks pretty good to me.

394
00:18:38.880 --> 00:18:42.759
<v Speaker 3>You really can't. In Baesian statistics, you calculate something called

395
00:18:42.799 --> 00:18:45.559
<v Speaker 3>the Bayes factor. It's a ratio that tells you how

396
00:18:45.640 --> 00:18:48.200
<v Speaker 3>much the data shifts your belief from one model to

397
00:18:48.240 --> 00:18:50.920
<v Speaker 3>the other. Okay, so a Bayes factor might say the

398
00:18:51.000 --> 00:18:55.720
<v Speaker 3>data is ten times or one hundred times more probable

399
00:18:56.039 --> 00:18:56.400
<v Speaker 3>under the.

400
00:18:56.440 --> 00:18:58.119
<v Speaker 2>Dark matter model, which sounds great.

401
00:18:58.240 --> 00:19:01.240
<v Speaker 3>It does. It provides strong evidence, but it does not

402
00:19:01.359 --> 00:19:04.440
<v Speaker 3>quantify the probability that the entire signal is just a

403
00:19:04.559 --> 00:19:05.799
<v Speaker 3>rare statistical flu.

404
00:19:05.839 --> 00:19:08.519
<v Speaker 2>No just random noise in the detector that happened to

405
00:19:08.559 --> 00:19:11.240
<v Speaker 2>look exactly like the dark matter chirp exactly.

406
00:19:11.640 --> 00:19:14.920
<v Speaker 3>In particle physics and astrophysics, the gold standard for a

407
00:19:14.960 --> 00:19:18.680
<v Speaker 3>definitive throw a parade discovery is the five sigma threshold.

408
00:19:18.759 --> 00:19:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Five sigma I've heard that term. What does that actually

409
00:19:21.240 --> 00:19:22.160
<v Speaker 2>mean In plain English?

410
00:19:22.359 --> 00:19:23.839
<v Speaker 3>It means there is a one in three and a

411
00:19:23.839 --> 00:19:26.160
<v Speaker 3>half million chance that the anomaly you saw it was

412
00:19:26.240 --> 00:19:27.440
<v Speaker 3>just random background noise.

413
00:19:27.599 --> 00:19:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, Okay, that is an incredibly high bar.

414
00:19:30.680 --> 00:19:33.799
<v Speaker 3>It is, and the base factor for GW one nine,

415
00:19:33.920 --> 00:19:36.400
<v Speaker 3>zero seven or twenty eight just doesn't reach that level

416
00:19:36.400 --> 00:19:37.599
<v Speaker 3>of statistical certainty.

417
00:19:37.799 --> 00:19:39.640
<v Speaker 2>So the signal is strong enough to be in the

418
00:19:39.640 --> 00:19:42.920
<v Speaker 2>top twenty eight, but not strong enough to absolutely rule

419
00:19:42.920 --> 00:19:44.000
<v Speaker 2>out a fluke, right.

420
00:19:44.680 --> 00:19:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Or it could be an unmodeled complexity in the vacuum

421
00:19:47.759 --> 00:19:51.920
<v Speaker 3>merger itself, like what maybe the black holes had incredibly

422
00:19:52.000 --> 00:19:55.559
<v Speaker 3>intricate spin dynamics that the standard templates didn't account for.

423
00:19:56.160 --> 00:19:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Or maybe their orbit was highly eccentric slightly oval shaped

424
00:20:00.160 --> 00:20:01.759
<v Speaker 3>right before they merged.

425
00:20:01.440 --> 00:20:03.720
<v Speaker 2>And that is centric wobble look like dark matter.

426
00:20:03.559 --> 00:20:07.599
<v Speaker 3>Drag exactly, or even a subtle calibration error in the

427
00:20:07.599 --> 00:20:12.119
<v Speaker 3>interferometer at that exact millisecond. The resolution just isn't quite

428
00:20:12.160 --> 00:20:14.680
<v Speaker 3>there yet to eliminate the mundane explanations.

429
00:20:14.759 --> 00:20:18.640
<v Speaker 2>So it's a tantalizing clue, but not the smoking gun exactly.

430
00:20:18.839 --> 00:20:21.759
<v Speaker 3>The researchers are demonstrating scientific rigor here. They are not

431
00:20:21.839 --> 00:20:24.160
<v Speaker 3>claiming a discovery. They are flagging an anomaly.

432
00:20:24.279 --> 00:20:26.680
<v Speaker 2>They're saying, hey, look at this weird BLib right.

433
00:20:27.079 --> 00:20:30.400
<v Speaker 3>But more importantly, they are proving that the analytical framework

434
00:20:30.440 --> 00:20:32.400
<v Speaker 3>actually works. The pipeline is.

435
00:20:32.359 --> 00:20:34.759
<v Speaker 2>Functional if it's there. This is how we find it.

436
00:20:35.000 --> 00:20:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Precisely, Get one, nine zero seven twenty eight is just

437
00:20:38.759 --> 00:20:42.400
<v Speaker 3>the first candidate. It warrants a massive independent review by

438
00:20:42.400 --> 00:20:43.079
<v Speaker 3>other teams.

439
00:20:43.359 --> 00:20:46.319
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but even if this specific signal turns out to

440
00:20:46.319 --> 00:20:48.720
<v Speaker 2>be a false alarm, say it was just a wobbly

441
00:20:48.880 --> 00:20:52.960
<v Speaker 2>vacuum merger, this whole method changes everything, doesn't it.

442
00:20:52.960 --> 00:20:56.720
<v Speaker 3>It represents a massive paradigm shift. A RICOEXI actually highlighted

443
00:20:56.759 --> 00:21:00.319
<v Speaker 3>a huge vulnerability in how we currently process data. Called

444
00:21:00.319 --> 00:21:02.319
<v Speaker 3>it the danger of the wrong dictionary.

445
00:21:02.599 --> 00:21:04.920
<v Speaker 2>The wrong dictionary. I like that. So if we're only

446
00:21:05.039 --> 00:21:08.680
<v Speaker 2>armed with vacuum templates, our empty space dictionary, we risk

447
00:21:08.920 --> 00:21:11.200
<v Speaker 2>mythclassifying the entire universe.

448
00:21:10.960 --> 00:21:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Exactly because the matched filtering algorithm fundamentally projects the raw

449
00:21:15.039 --> 00:21:16.920
<v Speaker 3>data onto whatever templates you give it.

450
00:21:16.920 --> 00:21:17.799
<v Speaker 2>It's an autocorrect.

451
00:21:17.839 --> 00:21:19.160
<v Speaker 3>An autocorrect, yes.

452
00:21:19.000 --> 00:21:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Like imagine I type a perfectly valid but obscure word

453
00:21:22.000 --> 00:21:24.519
<v Speaker 2>into my phone and my spell checker doesn't have it

454
00:21:24.559 --> 00:21:26.920
<v Speaker 2>in its dictionary, so it just quietly autocorrects it to

455
00:21:26.960 --> 00:21:30.920
<v Speaker 2>something common and I send the text without knowing it

456
00:21:31.000 --> 00:21:32.240
<v Speaker 2>change my meaning entirely.

457
00:21:32.279 --> 00:21:34.880
<v Speaker 3>That is a perfect analogy. If your template BANG only

458
00:21:34.920 --> 00:21:38.000
<v Speaker 3>has empty space black holes, the algorithm will ruthlessly force

459
00:21:38.079 --> 00:21:40.079
<v Speaker 3>every incoming wave to fit that scenario.

460
00:21:40.400 --> 00:21:42.759
<v Speaker 2>So if a real dark matter merger hits the Earth,

461
00:21:43.079 --> 00:21:45.480
<v Speaker 2>the computer won't crash or see I don't know. It'll

462
00:21:45.519 --> 00:21:47.480
<v Speaker 2>just find the closest empty space match.

463
00:21:47.599 --> 00:21:50.359
<v Speaker 3>It will say, oh, this isn't a twenty solar mass

464
00:21:50.400 --> 00:21:53.359
<v Speaker 3>binary in a dark cloud. This is obviously a twenty

465
00:21:53.400 --> 00:21:56.920
<v Speaker 3>two solar mass binary in empty space, but with slightly

466
00:21:57.000 --> 00:21:57.640
<v Speaker 3>weird spin.

467
00:21:58.119 --> 00:22:00.920
<v Speaker 2>It just tweaks the final parameter to hide the anomaly.

468
00:22:01.079 --> 00:22:05.319
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it artificially compensates for the phase shift. It buries

469
00:22:05.359 --> 00:22:07.920
<v Speaker 3>the signature of dark matter in the residual noise.

470
00:22:08.799 --> 00:22:12.559
<v Speaker 2>We've basically been reading the universe's text messages, but our

471
00:22:12.640 --> 00:22:15.759
<v Speaker 2>autocorrect was hiding the real meaning, and that.

472
00:22:15.759 --> 00:22:19.079
<v Speaker 3>Is the profound danger. By aggressively matching everything to a

473
00:22:19.119 --> 00:22:22.920
<v Speaker 3>simplified vacuum assumption, we blind ourselves to fundamental physics.

474
00:22:23.000 --> 00:22:24.759
<v Speaker 2>We needed a bitter dictionary, and.

475
00:22:24.759 --> 00:22:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Now we have one. These new dark matter templates give

476
00:22:28.039 --> 00:22:31.160
<v Speaker 3>the algorithms the vocabulary they actually need to interpret the

477
00:22:31.240 --> 00:22:32.119
<v Speaker 3>data correctly.

478
00:22:32.440 --> 00:22:35.599
<v Speaker 2>That is just brilliant. And you know, Rodrigo Vicente made

479
00:22:35.640 --> 00:22:37.559
<v Speaker 2>a point about this that really stuck with me. A

480
00:22:37.599 --> 00:22:40.799
<v Speaker 2>shift in how we fundamentally view the dark sector.

481
00:22:40.960 --> 00:22:43.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the transition from the macro to the micro.

482
00:22:43.519 --> 00:22:47.119
<v Speaker 2>Right, Because traditionally we only look at dark matter on

483
00:22:47.200 --> 00:22:49.039
<v Speaker 2>these unfathomably.

484
00:22:48.440 --> 00:22:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Huge scales, galaxy clusters weighing millions of billions of solar masses,

485
00:22:54.319 --> 00:22:58.240
<v Speaker 3>measuring the velocity of galaxy spinning inside those clusters.

486
00:22:57.759 --> 00:23:01.319
<v Speaker 2>Weak gravitational lensing, stretching across millions of light years.

487
00:23:01.480 --> 00:23:03.880
<v Speaker 3>We are always looking at the universe on the largest

488
00:23:03.920 --> 00:23:08.559
<v Speaker 3>possible scales. But this methodology radically alters the focal length.

489
00:23:08.720 --> 00:23:10.200
<v Speaker 2>It zooms way way in.

490
00:23:10.440 --> 00:23:14.400
<v Speaker 3>It forces us into the extreme micro scale of astrophysics.

491
00:23:14.880 --> 00:23:18.200
<v Speaker 3>We are moving from the diffuse halos of entire galaxies

492
00:23:18.519 --> 00:23:22.160
<v Speaker 3>to examining the immediate environment just a few kilometers outside

493
00:23:22.160 --> 00:23:24.720
<v Speaker 3>the event horizon of one specific black hole.

494
00:23:24.759 --> 00:23:27.759
<v Speaker 2>We're looking at the deepest, most extreme gravity wells in

495
00:23:27.799 --> 00:23:28.839
<v Speaker 2>the universe.

496
00:23:28.720 --> 00:23:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Testing the quantum mechanical nature of dark matter, its wavelike coherence,

497
00:23:33.279 --> 00:23:36.279
<v Speaker 3>its ability to steal energy from space time itself.

498
00:23:36.359 --> 00:23:39.519
<v Speaker 2>It really bridges the massive cosmos with particle physics.

499
00:23:39.599 --> 00:23:42.200
<v Speaker 3>It does. And as the LVK network turns back on

500
00:23:42.240 --> 00:23:45.839
<v Speaker 3>for its upcoming observing runs, and as next generation detecors

501
00:23:45.839 --> 00:23:46.440
<v Speaker 3>get built like.

502
00:23:46.359 --> 00:23:48.759
<v Speaker 2>The Cosmic Explorer right with Einstein telescope.

503
00:23:49.079 --> 00:23:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the sensitivity of these interferometers is going to increase exponentially.

504
00:23:54.319 --> 00:23:57.400
<v Speaker 3>The signal to noise ratios will climb. We will be

505
00:23:57.440 --> 00:24:00.000
<v Speaker 3>detecting thousands of binary mergers.

506
00:23:59.680 --> 00:24:01.319
<v Speaker 2>Reaching all the way back to the dawn of the

507
00:24:01.400 --> 00:24:02.559
<v Speaker 2>universe exactly.

508
00:24:02.920 --> 00:24:06.160
<v Speaker 3>And for every single one of those events, we now

509
00:24:06.200 --> 00:24:09.599
<v Speaker 3>have the mathematical tools to screen them for this invisible drag.

510
00:24:10.000 --> 00:24:11.720
<v Speaker 2>The pipeline is ready, the.

511
00:24:11.559 --> 00:24:15.759
<v Speaker 3>Theoretical waveforms are there. As Sumunroy emphasized, the volume of

512
00:24:15.839 --> 00:24:19.400
<v Speaker 3>data is only going to increase. If light scalar particles

513
00:24:19.440 --> 00:24:22.039
<v Speaker 3>really do make up eighty five percent of the matter

514
00:24:22.079 --> 00:24:25.279
<v Speaker 3>in the universe, it's mathematically inevitable that we will catch

515
00:24:25.279 --> 00:24:27.880
<v Speaker 3>a merger with the signal strong enough to shatter that

516
00:24:27.920 --> 00:24:28.839
<v Speaker 3>five sigma threshold.

517
00:24:28.920 --> 00:24:29.880
<v Speaker 2>It's just a matter of time.

518
00:24:30.000 --> 00:24:32.519
<v Speaker 3>It is purely a matter of statistical accumulation.

519
00:24:32.640 --> 00:24:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Now, man, what a journey we started with this tiny

520
00:24:35.839 --> 00:24:39.839
<v Speaker 2>invisible anomaly from twenty nineteen, we impact the whimpy problem.

521
00:24:40.039 --> 00:24:44.079
<v Speaker 2>We explored the completely bizarre reality of ultra light scalar

522
00:24:44.119 --> 00:24:46.039
<v Speaker 2>fields and macroscopic quantum waves.

523
00:24:46.119 --> 00:24:48.039
<v Speaker 3>We talked about churning the dark matter bitter.

524
00:24:48.039 --> 00:24:51.519
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the super radiance of spinning wack holes, and then

525
00:24:51.559 --> 00:24:55.240
<v Speaker 2>the sheer computational triumph of modeling that dynamical friction.

526
00:24:55.279 --> 00:24:58.880
<v Speaker 3>And using Bayesian inference to find that friction hidden in

527
00:24:58.920 --> 00:25:01.000
<v Speaker 3>the microscopic rip of space time.

528
00:25:01.480 --> 00:25:03.960
<v Speaker 2>We really are standing on the edge of a totally

529
00:25:04.000 --> 00:25:07.839
<v Speaker 2>new era in astronomy. We finally have the dictionary to

530
00:25:07.880 --> 00:25:10.480
<v Speaker 2>translate the hidden forces that shape everything.

531
00:25:10.640 --> 00:25:11.839
<v Speaker 3>It's incredibly exciting.

532
00:25:12.039 --> 00:25:14.599
<v Speaker 2>So I want to leave everyone listening with a final,

533
00:25:14.839 --> 00:25:16.680
<v Speaker 2>slightly mind bending thought to chew On.

534
00:25:16.880 --> 00:25:17.759
<v Speaker 3>I like the sound of that.

535
00:25:18.319 --> 00:25:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Think about the broader implications of all this physics we

536
00:25:20.720 --> 00:25:23.799
<v Speaker 2>just talked about. If dark matter is this stuff that

537
00:25:23.920 --> 00:25:29.160
<v Speaker 2>is completely invisible, that totally ignores light, if it naturally

538
00:25:29.200 --> 00:25:33.599
<v Speaker 2>gathers into these hyper dense quantum clouds around extreme gravity,

539
00:25:34.000 --> 00:25:37.359
<v Speaker 2>how many stars, how many entire galaxies? How much of

540
00:25:37.400 --> 00:25:41.359
<v Speaker 2>the actual foundational architecture of our universe has been secretly

541
00:25:41.400 --> 00:25:43.160
<v Speaker 2>sculpted by these invisible.

542
00:25:42.720 --> 00:25:45.279
<v Speaker 3>Waves a staggering amount like right.

543
00:25:45.119 --> 00:25:47.200
<v Speaker 2>For all of human history, we have looked up at

544
00:25:47.200 --> 00:25:51.000
<v Speaker 2>the sky and observed the universe through light the electromagnetic spectrum,

545
00:25:51.519 --> 00:25:54.039
<v Speaker 2>and we've been mapping the visible matter, which is a

546
00:25:54.119 --> 00:25:55.960
<v Speaker 2>mere fifteen percent of reality.

547
00:25:56.039 --> 00:25:58.319
<v Speaker 3>We thought we were watching the main event exactly.

548
00:25:59.039 --> 00:26:01.799
<v Speaker 2>We thought the stars were the main event. But if

549
00:26:01.799 --> 00:26:04.960
<v Speaker 2>the gravitational waves washing over the Earth tonight are carrying

550
00:26:05.000 --> 00:26:09.119
<v Speaker 2>the signature of bosonic clouds and scalar fields, we might

551
00:26:09.200 --> 00:26:11.599
<v Speaker 2>have to accept that the visible universe is just the

552
00:26:11.640 --> 00:26:14.640
<v Speaker 2>glowing debris, the foam on the ocean, the sea foam

553
00:26:14.799 --> 00:26:18.039
<v Speaker 2>caught in the currents of a vast, invisible ocean. So tonight,

554
00:26:18.079 --> 00:26:19.640
<v Speaker 2>when you look up at the night sky, look at

555
00:26:19.640 --> 00:26:22.240
<v Speaker 2>the empty spaces between the stars, and realize that the

556
00:26:22.279 --> 00:26:24.519
<v Speaker 2>void is not empty. We are just finally learning how

557
00:26:24.559 --> 00:26:26.160
<v Speaker 2>to feel the ripples in the dark
