Speaker 1: This right, Yeah, what is it? Come on, Jimmy, seriously,
Speaker 1: the time is up. People are hip to this kind
Speaker 1: of stuff. I'm here tonight to.
Speaker 2: Blow the lid off it, to be the whistleblower.
Speaker 3: And for years now, talk show hosts, people on television,
Speaker 3: people in sitcoms have been hired by the government to
Speaker 3: throw you off the track, to distract you, to make
Speaker 3: you laugh and stuff like that make you happy and docile,
Speaker 3: so you don't know what's really going on. You know,
Speaker 3: they get out there in the woods in a circle,
Speaker 3: and they did, and they decide these things.
Speaker 4: On November thirteenth, twenty fourteen, Jim Carrey went on to
Speaker 4: Jimmy Kimmel and he talked about the no No things,
Speaker 4: and I gotta say, I remember that clip and I
Speaker 4: remember thinking to myself that seems like Jim Carrey's just
Speaker 4: taking the piss, He's just having fun.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 4: Well, then Jim Carrey dropped out of hollywo and kind
Speaker 4: of stopped doing acting roles. He stopped doing comedy too.
Speaker 4: He basically went completely off the radar, and he was
Speaker 4: one of the most famous comedian slash actors in the
Speaker 4: world at the time. Post Epstein doc drop it sounds
Speaker 4: a little bit more not like a joke, don't it?
Speaker 4: And that brings me to arguably the biggest break from
Speaker 4: the Epstein doc drop that we have found yet. This
Speaker 4: went crazy viral yesterday, including from myself on August ninth
Speaker 4: of twenty nineteen, United States Attorney's Office from the Southern
Speaker 4: District of New York and by United States Attorney Jeffrey S.
Speaker 4: Berman said. Earlier this morning, the Manhattan Correctional Center confirmed
Speaker 4: that Jeffrey Epstein, who faced charges brought by this office
Speaker 4: of engaging the sex trafficking of miners, has been found
Speaker 4: unresponsive in his cell and pronounced dead shortly thereafter. Today's
Speaker 4: events are disturbing, and we are deeply aware of their
Speaker 4: potential to present yet another hurdle to giving Epstein's many
Speaker 4: victims their day in court. To those brave young women
Speaker 4: who have already come forward, and to the many others
Speaker 4: who have yet to do so, let me reiterate, reiterate
Speaker 4: that we remain committed to standing for you, and our
Speaker 4: investigation of the conduct charged in the indictment, which included
Speaker 4: a conspiracy count, remains ongoing. But here's the problem. Jeffrey
Speaker 4: Epstein allegedly took his own life the morning of August tenth,
Speaker 4: So why was that letter drafted on the ninth? More disturbing,
Speaker 4: the letter itself says Friday Epstein definitively took his own
Speaker 4: life on the morning of the tenth, according to the
Speaker 4: official story. So not only did they get it wrong
Speaker 4: in terms of the date on that letter, but they
Speaker 4: also got the day wrong. So they have Friday the ninth,
Speaker 4: when in fact, Epstein allegedly was found unresponsive the morning
Speaker 4: of Saturday the tenth, around six forty am. And you
Speaker 4: may be thinking to yourself, it's just a typo, it's
Speaker 4: nothing burger. Well, here's the problem. There was an additional
Speaker 4: draft of that document, the actual document that went out
Speaker 4: that was on August tenth, the actual day that they
Speaker 4: claimed that he took his own life, in which it
Speaker 4: is modified ever so slightly, that only modification being that
Speaker 4: they added the words apparent suicide the beginning of that letter.
Speaker 4: So the preliminary draft, dated before he had actually done
Speaker 4: anything to himself or anybody had done anything to himself,
Speaker 4: said that he was just found unresponsive and then pronounced dead.
Speaker 4: The actual final draft, dated with the appropriate date, says
Speaker 4: that it was via apparent suicide. Now it gets weirder Berman,
Speaker 4: the attorney who penned that letter. Less than one year later,
Speaker 4: it was announced by Bill Barr, the Attorney General at
Speaker 4: the time, that Berman was resigning. Berman unexpectedly countered that
Speaker 4: announcement by saying, no, I'm not I am not resigning. Then,
Speaker 4: on June twentieth of twenty twenty, ag Barr removed Berman
Speaker 4: from his position, and then it was confirmed, after Trump
Speaker 4: denied having any involvement in the removal of Berman, that
Speaker 4: in fact Trump had been involved in that removal. Now
Speaker 4: you may be thinking to yourself, Clint, that is awfully strange,
Speaker 4: But I'm still not convinced. So let me remind you
Speaker 4: of some other findings that came from those document drops.
Speaker 4: On Thursday of August eighth, twenty nineteen, one day before
Speaker 4: that preliminary draft was sent, we have a email with
Speaker 4: both the from and to redacted, as well as the
Speaker 4: names of the inmates redacted. But being that it is
Speaker 4: in the Epstein file, we have to assume that this
Speaker 4: was about the transfer of an inmate into Jeffrey Epstein's
Speaker 4: cell or out of Jeffrey Epstein's cell. Either way, Both
Speaker 4: the name and the inmate number are redacted. More notable
Speaker 4: the actual transfer date. It says, please schedule the transfer
Speaker 4: for Friday eight nine to nineteen. Now there's another tidbit
Speaker 4: that you have to remember. The prison go yards in
Speaker 4: that jail fell asleep that night. They were supposed to
Speaker 4: be inspecting Epstein's cell every thirty minutes, but in fact,
Speaker 4: around ten forty pm on Friday the ninth, they did
Speaker 4: their very last spot chat. What's even stranger is that
Speaker 4: at ten thirty nine and forty two seconds, so approximately
Speaker 4: ten forty pm on Friday night, the exact same time
Speaker 4: that they are allegedly doing their last check of the
Speaker 4: inmates to make sure that they are okay, that they
Speaker 4: are not injuring themselves. We now have new footage from
Speaker 4: that jail block that shows a figure clad in orange
Speaker 4: a La prison jumpsuit that is seen walking. You can't
Speaker 4: see him very well, but you'd see clearly that there
Speaker 4: is a figure in orange that is walking towards or
Speaker 4: away from Jeffrey Epstein's cell. I'm not sure which. Needless
Speaker 4: to say, it's extraordinarily unusual either way, in that you
Speaker 4: would not expect a prisoner to be out of his
Speaker 4: cell at ten forty pm at night. And it gets
Speaker 4: weirder from there in that they are now saying that
Speaker 4: the device that Epstein allegedly used on himself is no
Speaker 4: longer believed to have been what he actually used to
Speaker 4: take his own life. It should also be noted that
Speaker 4: Epstein met with his attorneys at seven forty nine pm
Speaker 4: Friday night. His attorneys described him as quote upbeat. The
Speaker 4: two guards which were assigned to check up on Epstein
Speaker 4: did not do so. They in fact falsified the records,
Speaker 4: saying that they did when they had not because they
Speaker 4: had allegedly fallen asleep at their desk for over three hours.
Speaker 4: And let us not forget that there was also two
Speaker 4: additional cameras that were facing Epstein's jail cell that malfunctioned
Speaker 4: and had no footage whatsoever. There was also another camera
Speaker 4: which malfunctioned and had no footage whatsoever. We only got
Speaker 4: this footage after demanding it about five years later. So
Speaker 4: what are we to conclude from all of this? Well, firstly,
Speaker 4: we're being lied to as to the conclusion as to
Speaker 4: the true nature of his early demise. I can't be certain.
Speaker 4: Many people are obviously pontificating and thinking aloud that perhaps
Speaker 4: this indicates that there was foreknowledge and that Epstein was
Speaker 4: removed from his cell. I am not so certain that
Speaker 4: is the case. In fact, I lean in the opposite direction,
Speaker 4: that this was premeditated and this was carried out by
Speaker 4: the state itself. The reason I lean in that direction
Speaker 4: is simply because this guy carried such immense secrets about
Speaker 4: so many rich and powerful people. I think it's kind
Speaker 4: of far fetched to believe that they would risk him
Speaker 4: being removed and I don't know, flown to Tel aviv
Speaker 4: or to his New Mexico property or some other random
Speaker 4: location and expected to live his life. Given that he
Speaker 4: wasn't exactly a small time figure. He was one of
Speaker 4: the most famous people in the world at that time.
Speaker 4: I just think that's a bit of a stretch. I
Speaker 4: think that if you're going to tie up the loose ends,
Speaker 4: you do it definitively. Now. To be clear, I'm open
Speaker 4: to both possibilities. The only thing I'm not open to
Speaker 4: is essentially the FBI's narrative on this. At this point,
Speaker 4: they have demon's such an immense ability to lie to us.
Speaker 4: I don't know why anyone would be taking them seriously
Speaker 4: at this junction. They've proven themselves to be so full
Speaker 4: of shit, I don't think anybody is actually taking them seriously.
Speaker 4: So much so that in fact, the FBI had an
Speaker 4: investigation into co conspirators along with Epstein, which cash Betel,
Speaker 4: in my opinion, perjured himself to Congress about did Epstein
Speaker 4: traffic these young women too? Besides himself himself? There is
Speaker 4: no credible information none.
Speaker 6: If there were, I would bring the case yesterday.
Speaker 1: Now watch clothes, watch close.
Speaker 4: For fix to other individuals. And the information we have
Speaker 4: again is limited.
Speaker 6: So the answer is no one for the information that
Speaker 6: we have and the files in the case file.
Speaker 4: Okay, now.
Speaker 1: The information that we have. So he knows he's lying
Speaker 1: when he says that he goes the information that we have,
Speaker 1: he knows he's lying, and he's wondering, hey, is this working?
Speaker 1: Is this going? Is going well? Am I lying?
Speaker 4: Effectively? In the doc drop, we have a chart of
Speaker 4: some of the co collaborators or co conspirators Darren Endyke,
Speaker 4: Harry billar, Richard Kahn, Giselain Maxwell, Leslie Groff, John Luburnell,
Speaker 4: as well as six additional perpetrators or suspects which have
Speaker 4: not been named and are inexplicably still being redacted. So
Speaker 4: what do I think is really going on here? Well,
Speaker 4: a cover up for sure, but don't take my word
Speaker 4: for it. Here's aribin menashe a former Israeli intelligence officer,
Speaker 4: and what he had to say just a few days ago.
Speaker 2: We'll pressure Netanyahu to release the real information that no
Speaker 2: one has at the moment.
Speaker 6: In my opinion, if there's a real deal between the
Speaker 6: Americans and the Iranians, and it's going towards that Natania,
Speaker 6: who will try to sabotage. One of the ways he
Speaker 6: sabotage it is by putting out Apstein against US government officials,
Speaker 6: including Trump, Neil, material that wasn't seen before and the
Speaker 6: and public.
Speaker 2: So it's not just Trump. I know that Howard Lutnik
Speaker 2: has mentioned there are officials and not.
Speaker 6: Just Trump, other officials too, Yes, and he'll try to
Speaker 6: sabotage the whole uh negotiation.
Speaker 4: Now, maybe you're thinking to yourself, well, that still sounds
Speaker 4: far fetched to me. Maybe this guy's sour grapes. And
Speaker 4: I'd say sure, maybe, except for the fact that Netnaw
Speaker 4: who was scheduled to have his seventh visit with Trump
Speaker 4: at the end of February, and that meeting just got
Speaker 4: pushed up. They're going to have it next week, which
Speaker 4: tells me that Netna, who is very concerned based off
Speaker 4: of reporting that says that the Trump administration was having
Speaker 4: productive talks with the Iranians, that now they are making
Speaker 4: sure that those productive talks fall through, because the ultimate
Speaker 4: endgame in all of this, all along has been to
Speaker 4: make sure that the United States, you, your blood and
Speaker 4: treasure and maybe your sons, go and fight and die
Speaker 4: on behalf of Israel in the deserts of Iran, which
Speaker 4: has left many of us feeling the same way Tim
Speaker 4: Burchett does.
Speaker 6: Should there be an investigation or is it a special
Speaker 6: counsel investigation?
Speaker 5: I don't know. I'm not an attorney. I just find
Speaker 5: them guilty and hang them publicly. I mean, I'm not
Speaker 5: that's not over the top either. I'm ready. I'm over
Speaker 5: it to disgust me. I'm big on clarity and transparency,
Speaker 5: and you know that's a good reason people don't trust
Speaker 5: government in either party.
Speaker 6: But you don't believe what the Justice Department is saying.
Speaker 5: I don't know, you know, I don't I don't I think,
Speaker 5: I don't. Don't, I don't try.
Speaker 4: No, I don't. Well, thank you for being honest, Tim,
Speaker 4: That's how anybody else paying attention in America feels too. No,
Speaker 4: I don't trust the Justice Department. I'd have to be
Speaker 4: an absolute imbecile to still trust them at all. Have
Speaker 4: you seen these prices? I'm talking about precious metals. Obviously,
Speaker 4: gold and silver markets have been absolutely ripping. There's a
Speaker 4: massive pullback happening right now, which is to be expected
Speaker 4: in any bowl market. But if you've been considering getting
Speaker 4: your hands on some physical which is always my preference,
Speaker 4: I do not do paper contracts, always physical. If you
Speaker 4: want to learn why gold and silver have exploded and
Speaker 4: why they could potentially explode even higher in twenty twenty six,
Speaker 4: then I've got the perfect guide for you. It's from
Speaker 4: my partners over at gold Co. They're an amazing company.
Speaker 4: They're supportive of this show, and I am fully supportive
Speaker 4: of them. So head over to Clint likes Goold dot
Speaker 4: com and get your free twenty twenty six gold and
Speaker 4: silver kit and big news. This month, gold Co is
Speaker 4: celebrating America's two hundred and fiftieth anniversary. With limited time
Speaker 4: bonus offer get up to ten percent free gold or silver,
Speaker 4: plus free storage and a free home safe with minimum
Speaker 4: cash purchase. Go to Clint likes Gold dot com for details. Again,
Speaker 4: that's Clint likes Gold. And if you want to go
Speaker 4: full skizzo, let's hear what asmen Gold had to say
Speaker 4: about this.
Speaker 1: People going crazy? You think they found a code word
Speaker 1: for human meat?
Speaker 7: Wait?
Speaker 4: What?
Speaker 1: Hope you were feeling better? Did we analyze the jerky?
Speaker 1: Why didn't we get jerky this week? Super cool beef jerky? Delicious,
Speaker 1: delicious lunch beef jerky. Hmmm, A small insulated bag would
Speaker 1: be fine. I don't run checking it. No need for
Speaker 1: crazy amounts of ice one should do. There is one
Speaker 1: bag of beef jerky in the fridge, Please get it. Also,
Speaker 1: Blank has more at her polace, please get it from
Speaker 1: her as well. I suppose it needs to be in
Speaker 1: a cold insulated bag. Just wanted to touch base about jerky.
Speaker 1: Jaye said he was going to start eating regular food again,
Speaker 1: so he might be eating us jerky. He said he
Speaker 1: has six bags of it in a downstairs freezer. Steve
Speaker 1: needs a six to eight ounce portion of jerky. I
Speaker 1: gave you all the jerky we had, and it lasted
Speaker 1: only half the amount of time it was meant to.
Speaker 1: I felt like it was more important for you to
Speaker 1: have the jerky to eat during my time off. The
Speaker 1: rest will go to you at LSJ when I arrive
Speaker 1: Little Saint James Island. And that's what LSJ must mean.
Speaker 1: So logically that means that they were doing this off
Speaker 1: of the island. Steve Hansen is sending jerky to your
Speaker 1: attention overnight. I believe it should be enough to get
Speaker 1: him through. Jeffrey Epstein is asking to bring him more jerky.
Speaker 1: Is there a time I could come, say hi and
Speaker 1: drop off the beef jerky? He will bring you to
Speaker 1: taste his new jerky recipe from the restaurant. He sends
Speaker 1: a warm hello. He's working at a restaurant called cannib Guys,
Speaker 1: the restaurants called Cannibal and cooks wait for it, beef
Speaker 1: jerky and steak. Can blank make some jerky?
Speaker 4: Look, I'm not going to jump to any conclusions that
Speaker 4: jerky automatically means what they're thinking it might mean. However,
Speaker 4: when you look through these emails, which I have a lot.
Speaker 4: You can watch my solo episode from a couple days ago,
Speaker 4: I recapt some of the weird ones. There's a lot
Speaker 4: more that are weird. Pizza and grape soda and thank
Speaker 4: you for the pizza party, and we need a certain
Speaker 4: duration of time with the pizza. It's like, who talks
Speaker 4: like that? And now you've got just a litany of
Speaker 4: messages about beef jerky, and all of them come across
Speaker 4: very strangely. And then you add to that the fact
Speaker 4: that they're talking about a restaurant with the name or
Speaker 4: the word cannibal in it.
Speaker 1: Are there any recorded images of Jeffrey Epstein with beef
Speaker 1: jerky at all? No, there are no recorded or publicly
Speaker 1: known images of jeff Epstein with beef jerky. Who sends
Speaker 1: beef jerky to a lab for analysis? Wait? What I
Speaker 1: was looking for? The beef jerky, as I knew, was
Speaker 1: in my suitcase, and I thought that maybe I left
Speaker 1: it on the beach, only to find a small plastic
Speaker 1: bag near my dog's bed. I'll email Francis to make
Speaker 1: us some more as I need six to eight ounces
Speaker 1: to send to the lab, and I'll forward to Francis
Speaker 1: the info to send to the lab directly. Guys, I
Speaker 1: think something's going on.
Speaker 4: And then you add on to that the fact that
Speaker 4: the Todd Blanche, the DOJ guy who came out and
Speaker 4: talked about this a week ago, said that, yeah, they
Speaker 4: were not going to unreduct any of the footage of
Speaker 4: actual victims. So we don't actually know the worst aspects
Speaker 4: of this. This is all of the stuff that they
Speaker 4: thought was benign. And we're still losing our minds because
Speaker 4: there's so much crazy shit here, even with immense reactions.
Speaker 4: Let's be honest, we should be losing our minds. This
Speaker 4: is one of the craziest stories we've ever come across,
Speaker 4: and it's one of the most overt and egregious and
Speaker 4: terrible cover ups we've ever witnessed. Now, I want you
Speaker 4: to ask yourself a couple questions. If those emails, those multiple,
Speaker 4: multiple multiple emails talking about beef Jerky are all benign,
Speaker 4: why do we have a bunch of redactions when it's
Speaker 4: just emails about beef jerky? Why why are there any
Speaker 4: redactions at all? Strange? Right, Okay, let's add to it
Speaker 4: that we now know that according to Jeffrey Epstein himself
Speaker 4: in an interview with Steve benn In which by the way,
Speaker 4: why is Steve Bannon catching no flak for having attempted
Speaker 4: to rehabilitate Epstein's image just before he perished. Weird, right,
Speaker 4: But anyways, Jeffrey Epstein says that he got his mansion
Speaker 4: in New Mexico explicitly because he wanted to hire scientists
Speaker 4: from Los Alamos, one of the most famous like military,
Speaker 4: dark deep state research facilities that we are aware of.
Speaker 7: So let's back up, So why did I buy a
Speaker 7: ranch in New Mexico nineteen ninety three? So that's usually
Speaker 7: some sense, so I would have funded it. In nineteen
Speaker 7: ninety Los Alamos, which was the high energy lab up
Speaker 7: in New Mexico, was losing all its scientists.
Speaker 4: And it says the most it was we Oppenheimer, where
Speaker 4: a lot of the nuclear weapons for the bomb.
Speaker 7: That's what a Manhattan project.
Speaker 6: Manhattan Project was Los Alamos.
Speaker 7: And you bought your property out in New Mexico to
Speaker 7: be near that, Yes, because the scientists who are going
Speaker 7: to be they cut the funding for high energy physics,
Speaker 7: but the people who worked in Los Almus would still
Speaker 7: be in the Santa Fe area. I wanted to see
Speaker 7: if we could build tools so others smarter than me
Speaker 7: could help investigate it.
Speaker 8: And that was the beginning of yours of the Santa
Speaker 8: Fe Institute.
Speaker 7: Yes, and Santa Fe Institute was founded to do study
Speaker 7: in this type of can these areas of strange things
Speaker 7: be described by some form of mathematics?
Speaker 4: Now I want you to ask yourself this. Do you
Speaker 4: think that those scientists were allowed to be hired by
Speaker 4: Jeffrey Epstein without the CIA knowing, without the DoD knowing,
Speaker 4: scientists that we're working on some of the most top
Speaker 4: secret projects in American history, and you think that they
Speaker 4: were being plucked and hired by Jeffrey Epstein without their knowledge. Well,
Speaker 4: if you're thinking that, maybe, which I think you're crazy.
Speaker 4: But if you're thinking maybe, I want you to also
Speaker 4: understand that Jeffrey Epstein text message to Steve Bann in
Speaker 4: which Steve says, on the coup, I'm deep in the
Speaker 4: middle of blank and then Epstein responds, k going into
Speaker 4: a skiff talk tomorrow. Now I don't have a date
Speaker 4: on that. I'm assuming it's around the same time that
Speaker 4: Bannon was, you know, buddy buddy with Epstein in twenty
Speaker 4: nineteen or twenty eighteen. But a skiff for those that
Speaker 4: aren't AWARE stands for sensitive compartmented information facility. It is
Speaker 4: used specifically for top secret information that is placed in
Speaker 4: an uncredited, secured room or area designed to prevent unauthorized access, eavesdropping,
Speaker 4: or surveillance. So why in the fuck was Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 4: going into a skiff a full decade after he had
Speaker 4: been charged and convicted for solicitation of a minor for prostitution.
Speaker 4: I don't know, but we sure as hell need to know.
Speaker 4: We need to know why this guy who was facing major,
Speaker 4: major charges at that time was headed into a skiff.
Speaker 4: It's not just me and you being suspicious of all
Speaker 4: of this. We've got Prince Andrews ex girl friend saying this, I.
Speaker 9: Don't even think Jeffrey Epstein's dead anymore. To be honest,
Speaker 9: you don't think Jeffy Epstein's No, I don't. I think
Speaker 9: he might be a lot. I just i'd seen one
Speaker 9: of those emails, one of the ones that ended up
Speaker 9: in the files, and I think that prison guard needs
Speaker 9: to be interviewed, the one that he said he saw
Speaker 9: the bodies being switched out. So your your honest belief
Speaker 9: is that Jeffrey Epstein is alive somewhere I said, it's
Speaker 9: not my honest belief, but I think it's a possibility.
Speaker 4: Where might he be Israel?
Speaker 9: Everyone is saying Israel.
Speaker 4: Everyone is saying Lady Victoria Hervey, who I've never heard
Speaker 4: of but seems like a real scumbag given that she's
Speaker 4: the ex girlfriend of Prince Andrew. But setting that aside,
Speaker 4: I think it could be a misdirect or. I think
Speaker 4: maybe she's being honest. I don't know which. All I
Speaker 4: know is that the official story about Epstein is about
Speaker 4: as suspect as anything I have ever come across. I
Speaker 4: think we all justifiably feel that way. I think we
Speaker 4: are all justified to feel that way. I think we
Speaker 4: all actually ought to be much angrier than we are,
Speaker 4: if you can believe it. As angry as I am.
Speaker 4: The fact that I'm even speaking into a microphone instead
Speaker 4: of just going out on the streets and losing my
Speaker 4: shit means that I'm handling this very, very calmly, as
Speaker 4: I'm sure most of you are. Trump keeps saying that
Speaker 4: he wants this to go away, that he wants to
Speaker 4: move on, that he wants to focus on other things.
Speaker 8: I think it's your time for the country to get
Speaker 8: onto something else really, and now that nothing came out
Speaker 8: about me other than it was a conspiracy against me,
Speaker 8: literally by Epstein and other people. But I think it's
Speaker 8: time now for the country to maybe get onto something else.
Speaker 8: They don't care, something that people care about.
Speaker 4: The answer and the response to that should and shall
Speaker 4: and will be forever more know and fuck you, we
Speaker 4: are not moving on. This is the apex. This is,
Speaker 4: as I said, the heart of darkness. If we don't
Speaker 4: get justice on this, you can forget about having justice
Speaker 4: on anything else. Ever. Again, if you can't get justice
Speaker 4: for child victims of sex trafficking to the rich and powerful,
Speaker 4: then do not expect legitimate elections or deportations, or to
Speaker 4: end the war on terror, in the surveillance state, or
Speaker 4: anything else. At its core, this story is about high
Speaker 4: level blackmail, debauchery, depravity at the highest levels of power.
Speaker 4: If we can't get to the bottom of that, we
Speaker 4: can never reclaim our government. Therefore, this should take precedent
Speaker 4: over all of our internecine battle issues from the left
Speaker 4: or the right. We ought to actually be able to
Speaker 4: come together for once in our lives about this very
Speaker 4: very important topic. Existential, I might say, but who knows
Speaker 4: maybe I'm a lunatic. If you think i am, correct
Speaker 4: me in the comments. And if you enjoyed this episode,
Speaker 4: hit the like button and do subscribe, and please share
Speaker 4: it around as this topic will not be very algorithmically friendly,
Speaker 4: as I'm sure you'd suspect. Love you guys, pease subscribe
Speaker 4: to Liberty Lockdown, great podcast.
Speaker 1: Clint is Tight