Speaker 1: All right, today is September eighteenth. It is eight o
Speaker 1: two am. Hopefully people understand it's twenty twenty four, and
Speaker 1: I'm here with which way you want to call it,
Speaker 1: Dwayne Hayes.
Speaker 2: Dwayne Hayes from here's my real name today.
Speaker 1: The Bulletproof pub And I actually looked up Diego Garcia
Speaker 1: the island after he mentioned that, and that was kind
Speaker 1: of interesting. I started getting into the weeds a little
Speaker 1: bit with that and what they were using it for.
Speaker 1: It was pretty pretty interesting stuff. I don't know why
Speaker 1: it was name, but it was. It really wasn't until
Speaker 1: later on in its history.
Speaker 2: That's just a very underappreciated region of the Indian Ocean
Speaker 2: that I have to draw attention to.
Speaker 1: Very interesting. Okay, So we are your historical detectives as always,
Speaker 1: and Dwayne always brings the goods. So however you would
Speaker 1: like to start today. And by the way, everybody remember
Speaker 1: bullet proofpub dot com. Okay, that's where you can find
Speaker 1: his blog posts, all the links to the videos he's
Speaker 1: been in for other people's podcasts, ours and so on
Speaker 1: and so forth, And there it is right there, Bulletproof Publishers.
Speaker 1: It is bulletproofpub dot com.
Speaker 2: Yes, So this is the landing page. This is what
Speaker 2: you're first going to see when you land there, so
Speaker 2: I would advise you to just scroll down a little bit.
Speaker 2: This is the last work that we did in the
Speaker 2: fall of twenty twenty three with Andy Rose from The
Speaker 2: Deep Share, and Andy and I are going to start
Speaker 2: working again starting this Sunday, so we're really excited about that.
Speaker 2: But the pocies, we're not sure, but we know that
Speaker 2: we want to work together. And I really value Andy.
Speaker 2: I really think we've never met, and he's in Boston,
Speaker 2: but I find him one of my close friends.
Speaker 1: That's cool. So I haven't looked at the site since
Speaker 1: I finished watching The Deep Share, the Deep Share series
Speaker 1: that you guys did, Yeah, and I should check it
Speaker 1: out see what is.
Speaker 2: He hasn't done much work there because he, like all
Speaker 2: of us, has a life and family and so he's
Speaker 2: been pretty busy. But we're going to be able to
Speaker 2: find some time on Sundays now to at least do
Speaker 2: a podcast and talk. And we're not sure where it's
Speaker 2: going to go, but I'm pretty sure it's going to
Speaker 2: be in this same similar direction, sort of getting to
Speaker 2: the bottom of this society. Governed by the scientific expert,
Speaker 2: the rise of the expert. Just continue flushing all of
Speaker 2: this out, because there's so much more. Brandeis was the
Speaker 2: founder of Savings Bank Life Insurance, And as we get
Speaker 2: into all of this now today you're going to see
Speaker 2: even wider scope of influence that Brandeis has the first
Speaker 2: Jewish US Supreme Court justice today in that DARPA has
Speaker 2: named their domestic surveillance program Brandeis. So we're going to
Speaker 2: get into that in a sec but I want to
Speaker 2: show you that there's a ten part series here. We
Speaker 2: really originated our whole research on the idea or the
Speaker 2: question of why our society is so governed by the
Speaker 2: technical scientific expert. Why during COVID did all of our
Speaker 2: elected officials, using finger quotations here, subsued themselves to the
Speaker 2: opinion of the expert. This is what we saw around
Speaker 2: the world that the medical industry actually took authority over everything.
Speaker 2: And so this is a major I mean, if you're
Speaker 2: paying attention and you know anything about anything, that would
Speaker 2: be a giant red flag. So we went and investigated
Speaker 2: how this happened and when and where, and as we've
Speaker 2: shown through previous podcast podcasts, with you on Wednesday mornings.
Speaker 2: That this comes from late seventeen hundred, early eighteen hundred Prussia, Sweden,
Speaker 2: the first collections of statistics and facts Censuses Frankfurt. Yeah,
Speaker 2: all of this region, the same region. Everything comes from
Speaker 2: that we call culture our Western culture today. But there's
Speaker 2: been a total flip of everything. So there's a ten
Speaker 2: part series. Those are all the articles, and then underneath
Speaker 2: we've got a podcast that's usually about an hour an
Speaker 2: hour and a half long that goes through those articles.
Speaker 2: We talk a little deeper.
Speaker 1: So yep, we're gotten an inversion. It's pretty much how
Speaker 1: it went. Invasion and inversion. Yeah, yep, so infiltration. I
Speaker 1: guess you could say invasion sometimes implies that you could
Speaker 1: tell it's happening.
Speaker 2: And so these are conclaves. When you look up the
Speaker 2: definition of conclave, it's a secret group inside of a
Speaker 2: larger group. And this is really what would be the
Speaker 2: most accurate. So we've got this y DARPA brand Eise
Speaker 2: program aims to ensure online privacy through technology. You can
Speaker 2: see that with a picture.
Speaker 1: Of brand Eyes and that's in DARPA.
Speaker 2: Yep, DARPA dot L you'll see we're gonna go into
Speaker 2: a video of the guy that's actually the director of
Speaker 2: this program.
Speaker 1: Is this still ongoing because I see it says three
Speaker 1: eleven fifteen.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's apparently done now. But like mk Ultra, I
Speaker 2: think it's just sort of, you know, become mainstream or
Speaker 2: you know, permeated so deeply and far reaching that it's
Speaker 2: just been normalized now. And so it's all based off
Speaker 2: of his Right to Privacy article written in eighteen ninety
Speaker 2: in the Harvard Law Review. In the Harvard Law Review
Speaker 2: three years prior to that was invented by him. So
Speaker 2: he's writing in the Harvard Law Review that he's founded
Speaker 2: in eighteen eighty seven, and three years later he's writing
Speaker 2: incredibly important precedent setting articles in Harvard Law Review. And
Speaker 2: this one here is no different.
Speaker 1: It's based on assuming for a mass manipulator.
Speaker 2: Huh yeah. And so Right to Privacy was the article
Speaker 2: that he'd written, I think it was two or three
Speaker 2: parts in successive Harvard Law Reviews back in eighteen ninety.
Speaker 2: So DARPA announced plants today to research and develop tools
Speaker 2: for online privacy. One of the most vexing problems facing
Speaker 2: the connected world is devices and data proliferate beyond a
Speaker 2: capacity to be managed responsibly. So here we have already
Speaker 2: in the first sentence what Walter Lipman called, you know,
Speaker 2: a vast environment in which the ordinary citizen is entangled.
Speaker 2: So this is the whole premise that the world has
Speaker 2: become so beyond simple that you know, us normal folks
Speaker 2: can understand it, and we wouldn't want to leave the
Speaker 2: governing of our society to a bunch of people that
Speaker 2: have no idea what's going on. We the people so
Speaker 2: named for former Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Lewis Brandeis,
Speaker 2: who while a student at Harvard Law School, co developed
Speaker 2: the content except of a Right to Privacy in a
Speaker 2: seminal article under that title. The new program seeks to
Speaker 2: explore how users can understand, interact with, and control data
Speaker 2: in their systems and in cyber space through the expression
Speaker 2: of simple intentions that reflect purpose, acceptable risk, and intended benefits,
Speaker 2: such as only share photos with approved family and friends.
Speaker 2: So this is the premise that it's all under they're.
Speaker 1: Concerned about that part, right, right, Come on.
Speaker 2: And you can see that once we get into this presentation,
Speaker 2: that it really in his language and how he's speaking,
Speaker 2: you can see that this is really the last concern,
Speaker 2: and I think he even mentions that that it's more
Speaker 2: so for their own defense of DARPA.
Speaker 1: Right, And it makes it it's funny because it's like
Speaker 1: only share photos with approved family and friends, and of
Speaker 1: course the spooks that you don't know that are watching
Speaker 1: and using your child's photos as a catalog for their dirty,
Speaker 1: perverted people.
Speaker 2: Yep, and everything that's shared obviously in Facebook. We have
Speaker 2: to consider the fact that Facebook was founded on the
Speaker 2: same day that Lifelog was folded, right, So this is
Speaker 2: really what Facebook is. It's just meant to document all
Speaker 2: of your life and the information you share in case
Speaker 2: there is ever a reason to use it against you.
Speaker 1: They grabbed again like Miranda Rights, Yeah right, they grabbed
Speaker 1: a guy like Zuckerberg who could be a dead ringer
Speaker 1: for the young Nathan rothschild to be the head of it.
Speaker 1: Not because he was really founding anything. He was just
Speaker 1: kind of you know, putting a face to it to Facebook. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean it's a doubt. There's a a doubt he's
Speaker 1: ever been working individually on his own to do any
Speaker 1: of this stuff.
Speaker 2: No, the Facebook certainly didn't come from Mark Zuckerberg's brain.
Speaker 2: So the right to privacy is Brandeis argued in eighteen
Speaker 2: ninety is a consequence of understanding that harms come in
Speaker 2: more ways than just the physical. This is eighteen ninety.
Speaker 2: Brandeis was reacting to the ability of the instantaneous camera
Speaker 2: to record personal information in new ways. Since then, ability
Speaker 2: of technology to collect and share information as far exceeded
Speaker 2: judicial and social expectations. The goal of darpest newly launched
Speaker 2: Brandise program is to enable information systems that would allow individuals, enterprises,
Speaker 2: in US government agencies to keep personal and or proprietary
Speaker 2: information private. So they are using all of this to
Speaker 2: further subjugate the populations. Yet there you see the first
Speaker 2: people that they identify to help is the individuals of
Speaker 2: our society.
Speaker 3: Of course.
Speaker 2: So it's this empty promise.
Speaker 1: And in the chip that Elon Musk is making us
Speaker 1: to help people walk, Yes, right, sure it is.
Speaker 2: So this is the lesson that we really want to
Speaker 2: show people is that this is the threat of progressivism.
Speaker 2: This is the problem of progressivism. It's always nice sounding
Speaker 2: words build back better, but what does that mean? Together? Forward? Together?
Speaker 2: Was Hillary Clinton's twenty sixteen presidential campaign platform. So that's
Speaker 2: highly progressive, right, communistic and anytime there's motion, anytime the
Speaker 2: word new forward change. Even you know Obama, even though
Speaker 2: he's completely socialist ties, Marxist ties, he's still progressive because
Speaker 2: it's hope and change.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, that's their that's their tool.
Speaker 2: That's the foot it's the implementation of the Overton window.
Speaker 2: So you can see it here that it's uh, it's
Speaker 2: an actual thing. We we're not making things up here.
Speaker 2: So that's your introduction to darp A brand eyes.
Speaker 1: I mean, is it full screen? Put us back up.
Speaker 2: And then I'm going to share again here right away.
Speaker 2: And well, I think I got to share a full
Speaker 2: page because there's tabs. That makes sense to you. I
Speaker 2: think that's what I gotta do. Oh yeah yeah, higher
Speaker 2: screen allows me to share all the tabs.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and if there's audio, you just have to slide
Speaker 1: the bar. If there's not, you don't need to do that.
Speaker 2: I don't actually see that there.
Speaker 1: But so freezer share a screen and then far right
Speaker 1: should be entire screen and then you have to click
Speaker 1: the box that you're that it's showing.
Speaker 2: Mm hmm. When I put the entire screen the it
Speaker 2: only gives me this.
Speaker 1: Yeah, no, but once you start navigating, it moves with you. Okay,
Speaker 1: you are.
Speaker 2: I click on, so now it's you should see.
Speaker 1: I don't have the thing down on about them yet.
Speaker 1: There it is. So there we are, and you just
Speaker 1: move around to Yeah, you know, we're into vortext. Then
Speaker 1: you just clicked whatever tab is you're going to go to,
Speaker 1: and it'll change to it.
Speaker 2: I don't see any tab.
Speaker 1: Oh really, well maybe I have to do it.
Speaker 2: Then hang on, let's just go this way. Let's see
Speaker 2: if this works. I'll just do it.
Speaker 1: I've never been on that side to know how this operates.
Speaker 2: Now here you So, here we go Buck versus Bell
Speaker 2: so and actually maybe we shouldn't start here. This should
Speaker 2: be the second thing that we talk about. Let's finish
Speaker 2: on our DARPA stuff. If we want to go through
Speaker 2: this video of the director of DARPA talking about the
Speaker 2: Brandeis program, and there's some incredible information here. He shows
Speaker 2: the apps that they are creating and the reasons why
Speaker 2: they have them. Okay, so here he is National Security
Speaker 2: Council Joshua Baron, and I don't know what ethnicity he is,
Speaker 2: but I would be willing to bet he's the same one.
Speaker 2: But so here he is in a this is so,
Speaker 2: this is at the Simons Institute. This is actually at Berkeley,
Speaker 2: no surprise there. So he's having a he's talking about
Speaker 2: this DARPA program and explaining to his colleagues exactly what
Speaker 2: it is. So, okay, I'm going to start at fifty
Speaker 2: seconds here. I think that's where I want to start,
Speaker 2: and we'll just let them roll for a bit.
Speaker 3: Hey, m as it leaves the monitor.
Speaker 1: And sometimes with YouTube says nope.
Speaker 3: Yes, try to research program manager dart Buk will be transformative.
Speaker 3: And I guess the second part I myself. So I'm
Speaker 3: a cryptographer by trade. Uh, and then I was at
Speaker 3: RAND Corporation for a couple of years doing a cryptography
Speaker 3: so I guess it's kind of a fun place to
Speaker 3: be where we fund research. So okay, this is cryptography.
Speaker 3: This might as well say privacy. Uh. I hate it
Speaker 3: when people use these things interchangeably, but I just did
Speaker 3: so fine, we've basically done.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 3: We've been doing programs as regard in the kind of
Speaker 3: privacy domain for about I'm going to mess this up,
Speaker 3: but something on the order of ten plus years. We
Speaker 3: started with proceed, which talked about computation on encrypted data.
Speaker 3: Safer was actually built a lot of the pluggable transports
Speaker 3: for tour or started some of that work. I shouldn't say,
Speaker 3: you know, we did them that it was a whole
Speaker 3: kind of thing, but it was all about doing resilient
Speaker 3: communication over the Internet. Brandie is about building privacy ware systems.
Speaker 3: Safewear has something to do with software obcuscation. I just
Speaker 3: took that one over this week, so it's been kind
Speaker 3: of fun. Man. That was actually why I was really
Speaker 3: hoping to be here for the whole week, but we
Speaker 3: had our PI meeting for that Monday and Tuesday. And
Speaker 3: then Race is about a new program that I started
Speaker 3: about security distributed messaging in contested network environments, think country
Speaker 3: scale places where it's hard to communicate. And so I'm
Speaker 3: not really going to talk about all of them. I'm
Speaker 3: just going to talk about these two. Though. Now that
Speaker 3: I kind of understand all the work that we're funding Undersafer,
Speaker 3: I should out that Dan Barnet, as part of Safer,
Speaker 3: has done some incredible work in privacy. There's a work
Speaker 3: called PRIO, which is about how do you do kind
Speaker 3: of basic statistical analysis on encrypted on encrypted web browser
Speaker 3: telemetry information that has been prototyped in Firefox, and hopefully
Speaker 3: we'll actually see wider use in Firefox. And then another
Speaker 3: one I'm going to mess us up, yes, which is.
Speaker 2: Okay. So he mentions Fidelius. Okay, And so I've gone
Speaker 2: through this video a few times. The first time I
Speaker 2: let it roll and I just listened, and the second
Speaker 2: time I started stopping researching, and this term Fidelius interested me.
Speaker 2: So I went and looked. And so can I take
Speaker 2: that tab now that I'm on and click on Fideliu's
Speaker 2: charm and you're going to see fidelius charm now? Or
Speaker 2: is it still the DARPA program?
Speaker 1: I'm still seeing him?
Speaker 2: Okay, so let's let's do this.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's very specific to that.
Speaker 2: I got to figure out how to do that because
Speaker 2: it's just a little clunky, not being able to go
Speaker 2: from to tab.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the entire screen thing, it's it's weird. It should
Speaker 1: it should pull up for you, but I don't know
Speaker 1: why I didn't.
Speaker 2: Maybe after, let's just take a minute after we've broadcast
Speaker 2: so we can do this correctly. Okay, give me one
Speaker 2: second here, let's see so Fidelia's charm. It's very interesting.
Speaker 1: Right, that's a strange blurred right.
Speaker 2: And so anytime I see things or words that I
Speaker 2: don't understand, it's very important for us to know what
Speaker 2: it is that they're talking about. Everything is hidden in
Speaker 2: their language.
Speaker 1: Yeah, don't just buy it. You getta you getta. Yes.
Speaker 2: So, yes, that can be painstaking, and yes it can
Speaker 2: be tedious, and yes it can be annoying, but look
Speaker 2: at what we find.
Speaker 1: You need to do it when you're running a book too,
Speaker 1: so you know, yes, where things are going, So you're
Speaker 1: being misdirected by a different you know, there's a there's
Speaker 1: a flow, and then there's a little details, those little
Speaker 1: eddy currents sometimes that matter, yep.
Speaker 2: And so you know, we just wanted to know. It's
Speaker 2: very important too to you know, these guys name these
Speaker 2: programs for a reason. They name them Fidelia's Charm. Uh
Speaker 2: we're gonna get into Basilisk, Roco's Basilisk. This is what
Speaker 2: they call another program. Uh.
Speaker 3: So.
Speaker 2: Fidelia's Charm was a very powerful spell used to hide
Speaker 2: things or places or to conceal secrets. It was an
Speaker 2: extremely difficult, multifaceted, and potent charm that could be used
Speaker 2: to conceal a secret inside an individual soul. This is
Speaker 2: this goes to Harry Potter movies, because there was such
Speaker 2: a thing as Fidelia's charm. So when we talk about
Speaker 2: black magic and you know the spells that they're putting
Speaker 2: on our society through the spelling, well we see that,
Speaker 2: you know that's happening here they're naming these things after
Speaker 2: black magic spells. Yeah, and what is this but the
Speaker 2: first elaboration of their imagination in censuses and statistics that
Speaker 2: first started in the seventeen hundreds. They're perfecting this science here.
Speaker 1: Do you see the Kabbalah in mysticism coming through? And also,
Speaker 1: I mean, let's not forget the very important fact that
Speaker 1: mister Brandeis himself was a Frankist with a frankest family
Speaker 1: and the practices of Frankism. They imply that there was
Speaker 1: some goings on between family members, if you know what
Speaker 1: I mean.
Speaker 2: Yes, right, So when I brought that up, did you
Speaker 2: see the Fidelious charm page?
Speaker 1: I didn't?
Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, good.
Speaker 1: I saw the black page, a black background page.
Speaker 2: Okay, So that's fidelious charm okay. And these guys are
Speaker 2: like the nerdiest computer geeks he ever saw in school,
Speaker 2: and this is you know, they're throwing tons of money
Speaker 2: at this guy. I'm sure he's fully wealthy, financially independent.
Speaker 2: I'm sure he is, after you know, running the Brandeis program,
Speaker 2: and you know the technology that he is helping develop
Speaker 2: through his brain power. So this guy, even though nobody
Speaker 2: knows about him, is an important guy to consider too,
Speaker 2: the head of this brandised DARPA program. I haven't gone
Speaker 2: into him personally too much other than just to see
Speaker 2: his general background. So I think we'll just let this roll.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, and.
Speaker 3: We'll listen to some more of This guy got accepted
Speaker 3: at Oakland for this coming year and answers this kind
Speaker 3: of wonderfully paranoid question as to how can I prevent
Speaker 3: malware on my computer from doing key logging for logins
Speaker 3: and passwords. And what they literally do is they put
Speaker 3: hardware between your keyboard and your computer and between your
Speaker 3: computer and your monitor Raspberry pies, and as you do keystrokes,
Speaker 3: it literally it assumes the presence of a secure enclave
Speaker 3: like SGX and pretends that sjax is secure. And what
Speaker 3: it does is it encrypts your keystrokes as it leaves
Speaker 3: the monitor and then forwards it directly to the secure
Speaker 3: enclave up to a different place in the cloud where
Speaker 3: the website can then access it. And then it actually
Speaker 3: hacks the HDMI signal to decrypt it on the back
Speaker 3: end and then actually show it up on your monitor,
Speaker 3: which is just kind of awesome just for those of
Speaker 3: you into that kind of thing.
Speaker 2: And I am, and I am.
Speaker 1: He says, right, yeah, they're tools, not our tools. We
Speaker 1: don't get to have that. They definitely keystroke goes, yeah.
Speaker 2: They So he explains that every keystroke goes off to
Speaker 2: the cloud. So it's like when you're washing your car
Speaker 2: and you have those automated little machines and you put
Speaker 2: a coin in and it gets sucked through that vacuum
Speaker 2: and up along the ceiling and who knows where it goes.
Speaker 2: Imagine that as each key stroke, because that's really what's happening. Now.
Speaker 2: What that does is give them possession of your information
Speaker 2: that you are sharing and producing, right, and so there
Speaker 2: is a level of vulnerability there that is directly proportionate
Speaker 2: to how much we're going to trust DARPA exactly.
Speaker 1: And that's I mean, that's a real thing. So I mean,
Speaker 1: think about passwords, think about everything, anybody at any time.
Speaker 1: If you're getting hacked and it's sophisticated hacking, don't expect
Speaker 1: it not to be from an agency that's deliberately trying
Speaker 1: to cause chaos and steal bank money and all this
Speaker 1: other stuff. Not that they need it, it's just to
Speaker 1: cause the chaos and to ruin people's lives.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And then you have to ask yourself how effective
Speaker 2: is all of this anyways, because there's data breaches, mass
Speaker 2: data breaches by giant corporations that releases hundreds of millions
Speaker 2: of people's personal passwords and information.
Speaker 1: Anyways, Wind, remember, so little Wind.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and there was just one just this year. There
Speaker 2: may have been even two. I'm just not up on
Speaker 2: the news. So but I remember hearing one within the
Speaker 2: last six months that it was a massive data breach.
Speaker 1: So a couple of banks that had that happen to.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So that compromises everybody. So why the hell would
Speaker 2: you trust that authority anymore? Yet? We do.
Speaker 1: Do you think it's some some fifteen year old in
Speaker 1: his parents' basement or whatever. Do you think it's one
Speaker 1: of these guys? I would, I would reader my bet
Speaker 1: on these guys.
Speaker 2: And I would I would say, I'd bet a billion
Speaker 2: that there's back doors and all those kinds of things
Speaker 2: deliberately built in here so that they can access your camera.
Speaker 2: I mean, he says this stuff in here too. You know,
Speaker 2: you can actually record the screen of the computer of
Speaker 2: the person that you were observing, so you can watch
Speaker 2: the work that they're doing on this screen. So we'll
Speaker 2: let them roll here.
Speaker 1: Let's get a Linux. I don't know if they can
Speaker 1: do it to Linux, they can definitely do it to Microsoft, right, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's for sure, yeah, Apple.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So I'm really excited about those two works. I'm
Speaker 3: not gonna talk anymore about them today, and so really
Speaker 3: the point is to talk about some of the work
Speaker 3: we do in Brandie explicitly, not all of the differential
Speaker 3: privacy work, which is substantial. So you know, if you
Speaker 3: hear Ashley or Michael or Jerome, I can't belive I'm
Speaker 3: gonna actually try to name all the names, or Katrina
Speaker 3: or Christine, and I'm definitely fitting or down all of
Speaker 3: you know, parts of their research are are funded under
Speaker 3: our work, and really really exciting work at that. So
Speaker 3: I'll talk a little bit about what races intended to be,
Speaker 3: and then quite Frankly, what I'm most excited about talking
Speaker 3: about today is about the future and where we should go.
Speaker 3: And the tagline for that is brandis is ending in
Speaker 3: a year?
Speaker 2: How progressive? M They're just worried about the future.
Speaker 1: How much you want to dot his gut? And I'm
Speaker 1: desperately in the trunk of his car.
Speaker 2: A quite possible they are at Berkeley figure out what
Speaker 2: we should be doing moving forward.
Speaker 3: So okay, okay, So what if Brandie brandis is you know,
Speaker 3: can you have your caken need it to like it's
Speaker 3: really about building privacy ware systems? So can I actually
Speaker 3: can I empower user to make the decisions they want
Speaker 3: about privacy? Can I build the system that actually implement
Speaker 3: the user's desires as regards privacy? And kind of how
Speaker 3: far can I get? We're organized Everything at DARPA is
Speaker 3: organized around like technical areas or tha's basically think of
Speaker 3: that as kind of research focuses that anyhow, So.
Speaker 2: So in this diagram, you know, I haven't spent a
Speaker 2: lot of time on it, but just sort of initial
Speaker 2: look at it, it certainly looks like the collection of statistics, right,
Speaker 2: and facts and information and then using that information to
Speaker 2: apply back to society. Now this is the general method
Speaker 2: of operation since before the cybernetics revolution and the creation
Speaker 2: of Norbert Wiener's feedback loop. So here it is the
Speaker 2: furthest imaginations again in the year twenty fifteen or whenever
Speaker 2: this video was created.
Speaker 1: You know, it's interesting here too, is all that metadata,
Speaker 1: especially if you're keystroking. I mean, that's a lot easier
Speaker 1: to make words out of, even though I mean because
Speaker 1: it's all running together, it's just a string, right, So
Speaker 1: that Palenteer software makes sense of that metadata for the AI.
Speaker 1: So you got to imagine that that's part of this.
Speaker 1: You know, it's sort for fast reference all that metadata
Speaker 1: that they're collecting in all these hubs, like I think
Speaker 1: there's one in Colorado or something like that, maybe Idaho, Yes.
Speaker 2: No, Colorado. Yeah, And that metadata tells you a lot
Speaker 2: regardless of whether they're recording the specific conversations and words
Speaker 2: that you're having, they can tell a lot from the.
Speaker 1: Metadata, every phone call, every keystroke.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And Pallenteer is another name of a corporation named
Speaker 2: after the all seeing eye in Lord of the Rings.
Speaker 1: Oh, that's wonderful. I didn't watch that movie, so I
Speaker 1: would not take that up.
Speaker 2: I've watched it reluctantly.
Speaker 1: Unclave is an interesting word to use for data enclave.
Speaker 1: It's like a placer group that is different in character
Speaker 1: from those surrounding it. You know. It says a portion
Speaker 1: of territory within a surrounding a portion of a territory
Speaker 1: or surrounded by a larger territory whose inhabitants are culturally
Speaker 1: or ethnically ethnically distinct.
Speaker 2: Wow.
Speaker 1: So why why data enclave?
Speaker 2: Right? Right?
Speaker 1: Strange?
Speaker 2: Yeah, so t.
Speaker 3: A one are kind of these underlying privacy preserving techniques,
Speaker 3: so specifically differential privacy and skirmulti party computation or I'm
Speaker 3: competing on encrypted information we do human I'm really excited
Speaker 3: that we're doing some really awesome work in human data interactions. So, uh,
Speaker 3: just because you say you want privacy doesn't mean we
Speaker 3: have any earthly idea about how to implement it. We
Speaker 3: have to communication. My favorite story for that is back
Speaker 3: in the day when especially Android users would download the
Speaker 3: encrypted messaging app Signal.
Speaker 2: So is protecting our safety digitally another unattainable ideal? Right?
Speaker 2: Because this is really how the progressives in our twentieth
Speaker 2: century has been steered by this promise of an unattainable
Speaker 2: ideal signal.
Speaker 1: Everybody thinks that that's secure. I have to talk to
Speaker 1: certain people on signal only because that's the only thing
Speaker 1: that they'll use, right. And I've heard from people who
Speaker 1: learn into the software stuff and like that say that
Speaker 1: that's already controlled by sure spooks.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I was using it too during COVID, and I
Speaker 2: got rid of all of it, because who knows even
Speaker 2: if you were to go all the way back to
Speaker 2: writing letters, how do you know that somebody didn't open
Speaker 2: that up along the way and have a read, you know,
Speaker 2: and and up below them.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: Actually, I have pictures that I've I'm going through the
Speaker 2: Paris nineteen nineteen Peace Conference official Signal Corps pictures, and
Speaker 2: it shows there's a room where all incoming and outgoing
Speaker 2: mail went through a process where they opened it up,
Speaker 2: read it and determined whether or not it was allowed
Speaker 2: to come in or out. And they've got all of
Speaker 2: these envelopes set up on a string, and there's all
Speaker 2: of these Signal Corps soldiers going through this process of
Speaker 2: censorship or you know, protecting.
Speaker 1: You recall the aircraft scare, yes, but it's in the's
Speaker 1: coast guard. Still, that was their excuse to go through
Speaker 1: everybody's mail, right there was that little drum box, like
Speaker 1: the plastic drum box with the glove hands that stick inside,
Speaker 1: and they would open the inside and all that crap. Yep, yep,
Speaker 1: that happened within I don't know, ten yards from where
Speaker 1: of my I was doing security. Wow. Yeah, crazy, Some really.
Speaker 3: Work in human data interactions. So just because you say
Speaker 3: you want privacy doesn't mean we have any earthly idea
Speaker 3: about how to implement it. We have to have a
Speaker 3: real communication. My favorite story for that is back in
Speaker 3: the day, when especially Android users would download the encrypted
Speaker 3: messaging app Signal, it would say, you know, I need
Speaker 3: your contact information, And a lot of people who download
Speaker 3: Signal are privacy aware people, and they're like, why do
Speaker 3: you need all of my contacts? This is not a
Speaker 3: thing that I'm going to give you. The reason that
Speaker 3: Signal needs your contact information is to be able to
Speaker 3: very quickly infer who it is that you know who
Speaker 3: else is using Signal. But they don't say that, right, So, like,
Speaker 3: how can we need to be able to build mobile
Speaker 3: applications that very very quickly inform you what of your
Speaker 3: data they are using? And why they are using your data. Right,
Speaker 3: So that's research that we're currently doing mainly at Carnel Email.
Speaker 2: And then who's to say after that you're right exactly?
Speaker 2: And then who's to say after that admission whether that's
Speaker 2: true or not?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 2: Right? Again, you're caught in a gray area of vulnerability
Speaker 2: directly proportionate to how much you're gonna trust DARPA.
Speaker 1: And you know, he may I think he's probably what
Speaker 1: do you call it, what a man? What does that word? Anyway,
Speaker 1: he's he may actually believe that, he may actually think
Speaker 1: that that's what's what that is, or he's repeated it
Speaker 1: so many times that it's become natural for you know, uh, compartmentalized.
Speaker 2: There we go, right, Well, that is exactly what DARPA is.
Speaker 2: It's totally military. That's where compartmentalization comes from. So, yeah,
Speaker 2: he is the the director of the program, and so
Speaker 2: he's gonna he's gonna need to know just as much
Speaker 2: as he needs to know.
Speaker 3: We are building three different experimental integration platforms, which is
Speaker 3: basically to say, three major use cases experimental coalition, information sharing,
Speaker 3: mobile mobile systems and mobile phones. And the third oh yeah,
Speaker 3: internet of things, really smart buildings. We're going to talk
Speaker 3: more about that. I'm super excited that you heard Sharad
Speaker 3: speak yesterday, so I don't have to kind of I
Speaker 3: think that built a certain intuition about what we're dealing
Speaker 3: with in that space. And then we're trying to measure privacy,
Speaker 3: which is just insanely difficult because it's really hard to
Speaker 3: defind privacy a little and measure it. And so I'm
Speaker 3: probably so there you.
Speaker 2: Goose like hate crimes, hate crimes, and all of these
Speaker 2: things are hard to define. They always say, right, well.
Speaker 1: Hate crime is a stupid termonology. If you smitted a crime,
Speaker 1: you probably didn't like the person too much, right, And.
Speaker 2: There's already crimes in or laws in place, and they've
Speaker 2: been there for a long time to cover such things.
Speaker 2: They're just trying to add more and more laws because
Speaker 2: they're progressives building an administrative state that they want authoritative.
Speaker 1: An additional punishment. So it's a hate crime. So now
Speaker 1: it was going to be three to five, Now you're
Speaker 1: into for ten to twenty.
Speaker 2: Sure exactly.
Speaker 3: Don't even think'm gonna begin to talk with that today.
Speaker 3: So okay, So one of the things that we've done
Speaker 3: is actually kind of well, the name is at the
Speaker 3: very least motivated by NSA developed SE for Android. Security
Speaker 3: Enhancements for Android. This is Privacy Enhancements for Android. We've
Speaker 3: basically developed a version of the Android operating system that
Speaker 3: is explicitly designed to, in a very fine grained fashion,
Speaker 3: control how applications gain access to private information on your phone.
Speaker 3: So these things are called pals. You're always forgetting what
Speaker 3: it stands for. It's something like privacy Pricy Assistance Layer.
Speaker 3: I alwayly never remember it. But the upshot is it basically,
Speaker 3: any time that an application wants to access you know,
Speaker 3: one of these things, it has to go through this,
Speaker 3: and in particular, if you haven't given it that access,
Speaker 3: they won't get it and it will catch if a
Speaker 3: application is trying to gain access in a way that
Speaker 3: was kind of untoward. Interestingly, the other optionhot is we
Speaker 3: can actually turn off access beneath an application. So Google
Speaker 3: might want your so an application might want your location,
Speaker 3: and you have the ability using this to say no,
Speaker 3: which I think is kind of fun. So yeah, this
Speaker 3: is running on a phone right now, which means it's
Speaker 3: kind of real. And actually the team that's developing this,
Speaker 3: which is BBN and two six labs have been really
Speaker 3: impressive in there.
Speaker 2: Sorry when he says BBN, he means Raytheon.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Defense Dick, he's been he's worked for, he works
Speaker 1: for Darba. He was, uh, what was the other one?
Speaker 1: That was the other one he was, uh he worked
Speaker 1: for In the very beginning, Uh forgot.
Speaker 2: What the charm one you're talking about.
Speaker 1: He said something about some other, uh.
Speaker 2: Charm program. And then there's also the basilisk. Yeah, this
Speaker 2: guy's you know, deeply in there, and it's uh Defense
Speaker 2: Contractors and dark working directly together to secure your private communications.
Speaker 3: Their ability to track current Android updates as they occur.
Speaker 3: In fact, some of the more recent versions of the
Speaker 3: droid operating system will actually make it easier for us
Speaker 3: to do to do this. Okay, So that's just one version,
Speaker 3: and I really I think that's I really hope this
Speaker 3: kind of gets adopted in some fashion. Our goal is
Speaker 3: to open source this, and frankly, our real goal is
Speaker 3: I would love if Android actually released versions of this. Okay,
Speaker 3: So this is another thing we're doing this is you
Speaker 3: see aid stations on the left. A person has some
Speaker 3: particular ailment they need to get right to.
Speaker 2: An air section.
Speaker 1: Even that was accepted, because that's like assuming that Google
Speaker 1: itself isn't another isn't an arm of our government. It's
Speaker 1: the Googlement. So if you want them to do it,
Speaker 1: it's it's done. You don't they don't. They don't say no, sorry, Darva,
Speaker 1: you're not gonna We're not gonna put this up as
Speaker 1: an app. Shut up.
Speaker 2: It's first priority is defense spending. Obviously, it's not homelessness, right,
Speaker 2: They're spending billions of dollars a year on all of
Speaker 2: this stuff. So he's going to go through a couple
Speaker 2: of the apps that he's developed here, including this one,
Speaker 2: and he's and so keep in mind what this means
Speaker 2: as you're walking through the streets and just how much
Speaker 2: of your personal information is being grabbed from multiple places
Speaker 2: at the same time all the time.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I feel like regardless, but to have the
Speaker 1: actual app on it, it's just an additional maybe a
Speaker 1: closer look at you or whatever. But uh, like you're
Speaker 1: when you're when you're tracking your your jog or your
Speaker 1: your run or something like that. And one of those
Speaker 1: exercise apps they show you a map of where you
Speaker 1: were afterwards.
Speaker 2: Yes, and your heart rates and all of those things.
Speaker 2: And then isn't that your own compliance if you're actually
Speaker 2: clicking an out rather than allowing it to happen, right,
Speaker 2: it's actually a click of compliance.
Speaker 3: This is okay, okay, I want he being the actual
Speaker 3: nature of my ailment encrypted.
Speaker 2: Boston, City of Boston, interestingly enough.
Speaker 3: The various status STATI statuses of the AID stations encrypted.
Speaker 3: And the answer is yes, and we can do it,
Speaker 3: and there it is.
Speaker 1: So so they know that person, if they have a
Speaker 1: person of interest, they know exactly who this person is
Speaker 1: at all times, you know what I mean. So it's
Speaker 1: not like none of these crimes ever have to happen.
Speaker 1: If they suspect somebody like what happened over on mar
Speaker 1: A Lago the other day, if they if he was
Speaker 1: on the watch list or anything like that, and where
Speaker 1: he should have been for everything else he had done
Speaker 1: prior to that, if he was really the guy, he
Speaker 1: would never gotten that close, you know what I mean,
Speaker 1: because they would have known, they would have backed his phone.
Speaker 2: Well, then I also will say that the two assassination
Speaker 2: attempts on Trump are obvious propaganda. There are obviously staged events.
Speaker 2: I mean, when you look at the podium where his
Speaker 2: ear got clipped, and just the strangeness of all of
Speaker 2: the body language, and it looks like a very poorly
Speaker 2: executed play.
Speaker 1: You know, It's funny, is he that guy actually commented
Speaker 1: on the previous attempt and said whatever happened to the
Speaker 1: people that got wounded? And the one fireman which I
Speaker 1: had been asking too, that the retired fireman that they
Speaker 1: said died because it was never brought up afterwards. Trump
Speaker 1: never it was all about Trump's ear. If somebody was dead,
Speaker 1: you would think he would have paid homage to him
Speaker 1: in some way. He would have made some mention, some
Speaker 1: kind of onbile mention, given a posthumous medal or something.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, these people are pathological narcissists, just looking all the time.
Speaker 2: So here's this is another app and then there's one more.
Speaker 2: It's very interesting here.
Speaker 3: I'm just kind of basically showing this is kind of
Speaker 3: like my bag of tricks. I'm just kind of showing
Speaker 3: like various things that that we're doing, just to kind
Speaker 3: of give you a sense of the nature of the
Speaker 3: work that we're involved in.
Speaker 1: So part of which of the programs that use.
Speaker 3: Is all brandeis. So yeah, so everything is yeah, this
Speaker 3: is brand Ice is it's a very large program I
Speaker 3: think we have. It's fifteen different major performers I think
Speaker 3: is what we have, and then associated subcontract.
Speaker 2: Just don't ever say brand Ice three times in a row.
Speaker 1: Right, especially in a mirror.
Speaker 3: It's four and a half year effort. We're at our
Speaker 3: three and a half year mark. I'm not supposed to
Speaker 3: tell you how much is funded for, but epic foy
Speaker 3: at us so you can look and see.
Speaker 2: So yeah, okay, so obviously I went and looked. He's
Speaker 2: not going to tell you how much they're getting funded.
Speaker 2: He said, go and check the foyer request and you'll
Speaker 2: be able to find out. Well, I didn't need to
Speaker 2: do that. I just put in DARPA and whatever information
Speaker 2: that he just gave me and it came up. So
Speaker 2: let me find this here. It's called galo wois. So
Speaker 2: another one of these words that we must be familiar with.
Speaker 1: Oh shit, I don't know what's going on with the
Speaker 1: connection right now. Hopefully we didn't just get knocked off.
Speaker 1: It just dropped like dramatically.
Speaker 2: Did it? Yeah? And I saw it go to standard deaf.
Speaker 2: Are you able to.
Speaker 1: Read that stuff?
Speaker 2: Is this.
Speaker 1: I have to call them and get it and be
Speaker 1: on a hold for the row and a half.
Speaker 2: Yeah, just don't say brandised too many times.
Speaker 1: God damn it, we're really we're needled down right now.
Speaker 1: There's no internet really? Oh there, it goes a little
Speaker 1: bit better. This should not be happening.
Speaker 2: So would a new computer help with all of this? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Because right now there goes again. It's backed out to nothing.
Speaker 1: Yeah because right now this computer the biosos hacked. So
Speaker 1: the only Internet I can use is a stupid Century Link,
Speaker 1: which is garbage. But I have another Internet liver provider.
Speaker 1: It's it's cable and and I can only use it
Speaker 1: on my laptop. So as soon as I get this
Speaker 1: thing out of here, that I can get one that'll
Speaker 1: actually right keep me through this. So you're backed in
Speaker 1: the needle again. I don't even know if we're going
Speaker 1: to be online much longer.
Speaker 2: Right, So if anybody's out there listening still and we're
Speaker 2: online and getting through, yeah, let us know. I encourage
Speaker 2: you guys to support Ballbusters and Daniel's quest to get
Speaker 2: a new computer here so that we can do this
Speaker 2: a lot more efficiently. The more interruptions we have, the
Speaker 2: harder it is to sort of grasp the overall concepts.
Speaker 2: So I'm not sure should I just continue on or.
Speaker 1: Yet it's it's just doing it, stupid thing. But we'll
Speaker 1: have to just keep pushing forward.
Speaker 2: Okay. So you see galawais awarded fifteen point three million
Speaker 2: dollars DARPA contract for Basilisk projects. Do you see that? Yep? Okay,
Speaker 2: So that is the project that he is talking about
Speaker 2: being funded. So there's fifty ten point three million of funding.
Speaker 1: And so you include what do you call it? Does
Speaker 1: that even include their their what do you call it
Speaker 1: their pay? Or is that just for the project?
Speaker 2: Who knows? And who knows? Even if that's an accurate number, right,
Speaker 2: I wouldn't be surprised if there's a lot more, and
Speaker 2: especially you know, here we are nine years later, so
Speaker 2: you know this has been developed. These things seem to
Speaker 2: serve a purpose and then go away and new projects
Speaker 2: come up.
Speaker 1: Well, when he said that there was multiple like thirteen
Speaker 1: other projects associated to it was the first thing I
Speaker 1: thought it was the MK Ultra and how there's there
Speaker 1: was like one hundred and thirty or one hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty other one hundred and fifty sub projects.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and then it was normalized. It all just went mainstream.
Speaker 2: This is really where the pharmaceutical you know, you look
Speaker 2: at the changing images of man. They said, pharmacological control
Speaker 2: is the most effective. So you can see the rise
Speaker 2: of the pharmacy and and drugs even starting in the eighties,
Speaker 2: especially in the nineties. Now people today, I think we've
Speaker 2: talked about this. Can you know regularly you're going to
Speaker 2: run into people that are on more than one medication,
Speaker 2: which seriously disturbs you know, your natural path of who
Speaker 2: you are supposed to be. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the suppression is counter productive. It's actually harming you
Speaker 1: to suppressed the symptoms without actually addressing the issue, because
Speaker 1: in the issue proceeds and manifest somewhere else as something else.
Speaker 2: Yes, and grows. What happened to when you don't deal
Speaker 2: with your bills, they get larger with Basilisk is another word.
Speaker 2: It's in all caps. So that interested me. So I
Speaker 2: went to look at what that specifically means, and it
Speaker 2: brought up Roco's basilisk. Have you ever heard of that term?
Speaker 2: I had, I'd never heard of it before.
Speaker 1: I know what basilica is.
Speaker 2: Yeah, hang on a second.
Speaker 1: I tried to look it up. Pal p a l
Speaker 1: But all I got was the the video format, which
Speaker 1: is a phase alternate right, right, for like the European countries.
Speaker 1: That's one of the options you have when you're doing
Speaker 1: your you're editing for you're like video editing.
Speaker 2: Right. It's interesting that you use the word century link
Speaker 2: to is that a Is that a malware protective security?
Speaker 1: It's a shitty it's a shitty phone line thing. And
Speaker 1: it's uh, they can't even bond to our line because
Speaker 1: there's no fiber optics here. But I mean, it's been
Speaker 1: on the decline for a while and I've been trying
Speaker 1: to They said ten days, ten days to fix it,
Speaker 1: and then they told me that the line yesterday in
Speaker 1: an email, so they lied.
Speaker 2: Okay, so we got Roco's basil less on the screen.
Speaker 2: And it is a thought experiment which states that an
Speaker 2: otherwise benevolent artificial superintelligence in the future would be incentivized
Speaker 2: to create a virtual reality simulation to torture anyone who
Speaker 2: knew of its potential existence but did not directly contribute
Speaker 2: to its advancement or development, in order to incentivize said advancement. Wow,
Speaker 2: that's interesting, right, So this brings up thoughts of how
Speaker 2: conspiracy theorists may be actually helping bring all of this together.
Speaker 1: Oh, it signing their own death warrant, because if they are,
Speaker 1: if they're not, if they're not assisting it and speaking
Speaker 1: out against it, then yeah Jesus.
Speaker 2: And so they even you know, it says torture those
Speaker 2: that aren't actually contributing to its advancement, this super and superintelligence,
Speaker 2: probably on the on the same level as we see
Speaker 2: in the Matrix movie with the architect. Right.
Speaker 1: Tell me that's not progressive either, right, It's like you're
Speaker 1: not contributing to this society. Right, we don't find what
Speaker 1: you're doing to be productive or useful because it's you know,
Speaker 1: going against the grain, causing resistance, and you're not you're
Speaker 1: not working hard enough.
Speaker 2: Right, And so we can go back to the George
Speaker 2: Bernard Shaw where he indicated that we should go in
Speaker 2: front of tribunals every five to seven years and justify
Speaker 2: our existence. Yeah they did that was ever going to
Speaker 2: put us to death?
Speaker 1: Did you watch that Twilet Zone episode, No, the one,
Speaker 1: the the Absolute Man.
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 2: I did, Yeah, I did, Yes, I did. I watched
Speaker 2: that right after our broadcast last Wednesday. Totally interesting, very
Speaker 2: very very similar, Yes, exactly the same. You know. It's uh,
Speaker 2: he's being put out to pasture because he's just not
Speaker 2: a contributing factor to society because.
Speaker 1: There's no more books, so there's no need for a librarian.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I was thinking about that actually this morning. How
Speaker 2: up on the tower or this person is the representative
Speaker 2: of the government that's laying down the law. He's on
Speaker 2: this this.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, the super high podium.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and it's all you know, meant to intimidate.
Speaker 1: The remind me of the George Orwell stuff too, right,
Speaker 1: didn't I tell you that the giant podium make you
Speaker 1: look right? That's I think that's why the judge that's
Speaker 1: I R.
Speaker 2: Two.
Speaker 1: He doesn't want to be at the level of the people.
Speaker 1: He wants to be above. It's not sometimes they represent
Speaker 1: make a vote.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So two things here. He admitted that brand how
Speaker 2: large this Brandeis program is, and that everything he's describing
Speaker 2: here is Brandeis. And so now he's going to get
Speaker 2: into this buy me a Coffee app that's very interesting
Speaker 2: and it just shows you Yeah right, I laughed out loud.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 2: So we'll just let him roll here for another couple
Speaker 2: of minutes and we'll see what other admissions we can hear.
Speaker 3: So this is something that gets at so this issue
Speaker 3: of kind of when you ask people why you want
Speaker 3: their data, CMU has come up with. So let me
Speaker 3: back up. There's something that I always love calling the
Speaker 3: MIT Pizza Study, and I just googled it and it
Speaker 3: actually it's actually really studyly a bunch of researchers, Stanford
Speaker 3: economists in fact, went up to a bunch of MIT
Speaker 3: students and said we want the contact information on your
Speaker 3: phone and the student said uh no, or some percentage
Speaker 3: of students said no. And then they said, okay, we'll
Speaker 3: give you pizza. Now. Now will you give it? And
Speaker 3: the answer was fifty percent more said yes, uh, which
Speaker 3: means that, like, so.
Speaker 2: This is before COVID, but you can see that Stanford
Speaker 2: social scientists went to MIT to conduct this experiment, and
Speaker 2: just one piece of pizza people were willing to give
Speaker 2: up at least portions of their personal information. So we
Speaker 2: saw that in COVID they did offer pizzas, but the
Speaker 2: more famous one was donuts, and there was it was
Speaker 2: always incentivized.
Speaker 1: Vaccine, right, so this is really in some places free weed.
Speaker 3: Wow.
Speaker 1: Yeah, here's a nug for your troubles.
Speaker 2: Right, Well, they got to cover all the demos, right,
Speaker 2: all the demographics. You've got to cover the weed. How
Speaker 2: are we going to incentivize the weed? Smallkers? Well, let's
Speaker 2: just give them some weed, and sure, shit, there they are. Hey,
Speaker 2: I want my free weed. Here take the shot. Okay,
Speaker 2: And we saw that that's reality. And it wouldn't have
Speaker 2: happened unless we had a deliberately dumbed down society, because
Speaker 2: if we'd all studied the liberal arts and grammar, logic, rhetoric,
Speaker 2: and understood logical fallacy and when you're being lied to,
Speaker 2: this would never get off the ground. Programs like this
Speaker 2: would never get off the ground because they fail logic.
Speaker 1: Right. Just this whole idea of not being able to
Speaker 1: verify with a single sample what quote unquote bug or
Speaker 1: virus they're saying that they're inoculating you for. I mean, so,
Speaker 1: how do you know how to counter it if you
Speaker 1: don't even have a sample of it that you can isolate.
Speaker 1: Doesn't make any sense exactly, And how do you even
Speaker 1: prove that that's the motive of disease in the first person?
Speaker 1: It's not been balancing your body that's being caused by
Speaker 1: some sort of poison. There's so many questions that they
Speaker 1: don't answer.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and so anybody that has logic would would not
Speaker 2: take another step forward when there's no answers to their questions.
Speaker 2: There are multiple questions as far as the validity of
Speaker 2: their argument saying that there's this disease going around. I mean,
Speaker 2: they're like you say, there's way too many questions left
Speaker 2: unanswered to continue to listen to these people.
Speaker 3: What it looks like there, Okay, So and then we
Speaker 3: get to the we get into the work that Sharat
Speaker 3: is doing over at UCI and that team associated. So
Speaker 3: I should mention, of course that in each of these settings,
Speaker 3: what you kind of have is so what Charad is
Speaker 3: essentially an integrator. So in other words, they've developed this
Speaker 3: architect sure for IoT analytics. And then we have a
Speaker 3: number of performers who are working to try to privatize that,
Speaker 3: including some folks in this room. So in particular, it
Speaker 3: turns out that they can use Wi Fi handshakes to
Speaker 3: do social networks, geolocated social networks, So who's with whom
Speaker 3: and when? And they're deploying this pretty broadly around the
Speaker 3: UCI campus. So I love that the kind of main
Speaker 3: initial application for this was how fast can I get
Speaker 3: a cup of coffee on campus? Did Charrot already talk
Speaker 3: about this? Okay? So, in particular, it can see where
Speaker 3: are you by virtue of looking at the Wi Fi handshakes,
Speaker 3: it could figure out how many people are at your
Speaker 3: particular coffee place. Therefore, how packed is it?
Speaker 2: So they're triangulating you from the Wi Fi handshakes or
Speaker 2: pings as you're walking through, and.
Speaker 3: So it can kind of route you to the right
Speaker 3: place given real time analytics as to how many people
Speaker 3: are actually there. This raises a number of privacy questions,
Speaker 3: in particular, who's with whom? And when is it totally
Speaker 3: how to put this? The The semantics of the data
Speaker 3: is unchanged with regard to whether or not it's us
Speaker 3: in this room right now or it's students in a
Speaker 3: dorm room at two in the morning. Right there's no
Speaker 3: difference in terms of what that data says, but the
Speaker 3: underlying privacy content of that data can change in normally
Speaker 3: enormously right and so how do we begin to think
Speaker 3: about what that what that means is kind of one
Speaker 3: of the things that I think Sharad's work has challenged
Speaker 3: us with So that's another way of saying that the
Speaker 3: privacy value of big of large data is very hard
Speaker 3: to inferge that a semantic level. I'll give you another example.
Speaker 3: So we just recently started funding a professor here at
Speaker 3: Berkeley who is a great guy. We walked in. He said,
Speaker 3: not that the matters. He's a great guy. Knowledge said
Speaker 3: that whatever. But the we walked in and we asked
Speaker 3: what his research was and he said, we're improving access
Speaker 3: to micro loans in the third world, which is what
Speaker 3: he is doing, and in particular in parts, specifically in Africa.
Speaker 3: Essentially the main infrastructure they have is mobile phones, self
Speaker 3: phone infrastructure. Okay, so we will have familiar kind of.
Speaker 2: Can you say that again?
Speaker 1: I said, another experiment in Africa surprise surprise, right.
Speaker 2: Right, and it's talking about micro loans. It's a phrase
Speaker 2: I'd never heard before. In credits. It's involved with credit scores,
Speaker 2: and all of this is done for your convenience, because
Speaker 2: they're going to tell you how long the lineup is
Speaker 2: at all of the coffee shops around you, so you
Speaker 2: can choose the shorter lineup.
Speaker 3: With that kind of technology. So what they want to
Speaker 3: do is be able to give micro loans. One of
Speaker 3: the issues associated with loans in general is credit scores,
Speaker 3: and so what he figured out how to do is
Speaker 3: how to infer He can infer credit ratings via social
Speaker 3: via self une metadata. So that's an example or wealth
Speaker 3: for that matter.
Speaker 2: Actually, so did you hear the room It sounded like
Speaker 2: somebody gasped, right, So through your metadata on your phone,
Speaker 2: they're going to find out and he mentions wealth as well,
Speaker 2: they're going to know your credit score and just how
Speaker 2: much money you have in exchange for a quicker coffee.
Speaker 1: You have a value on your head, But did you
Speaker 1: walk around not even know it because you carry that
Speaker 1: phone around.
Speaker 2: Yes, we all do have a value on our head.
Speaker 2: We are all being harvested daily for our energy and
Speaker 2: our labor.
Speaker 3: Spirit. And it's like country specific, but you can basically
Speaker 3: use machine learning to do that, and he's demonstrated this
Speaker 3: in a number of countries. That's an example of data
Speaker 3: that has a certain amount of value or a certain
Speaker 3: amount of privacy content, and then by virtue of analyzing
Speaker 3: in a different way, is shown to have a different
Speaker 3: content that we had no idea as possible. And so
Speaker 3: how do you deal with the underlying privacy in these settings.
Speaker 3: I kind of have like a lot of these stories
Speaker 3: at this point, and that's really where we are right
Speaker 3: being able to do Wi Fi handshakes cameras, we can
Speaker 3: infer things, I mean, mental health status. Cardigie Mellon University
Speaker 3: is currently using cameras in some of their classrooms to
Speaker 3: infer how many students are sleeping during lectures.
Speaker 1: Okay, so this idea of a specific geographical location running
Speaker 1: a test on what's going to be the best place
Speaker 1: to go get a coffee because of the shortest line. Okay, well,
Speaker 1: here's the problem with that. If you give that data
Speaker 1: to everyone who's asking, then everybody's going to run to
Speaker 1: that same line and that's going to be the longest one,
Speaker 1: number one. So there's no logic there. The second thing is,
Speaker 1: how do we know that's not biased to who they
Speaker 1: want to make the money and then move very very
Speaker 1: that way by telling them a lie that it's over here,
Speaker 1: or that it's a dollar cheaper or something like that.
Speaker 1: You know, so it's silly.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And lines can change in a minute. Right, You've
Speaker 2: got three blocks to walk. There may not be anybody
Speaker 2: at that lineup by the time you get there. But
Speaker 2: you're you're even more important points there, you know, absolutely.
Speaker 1: This thing.
Speaker 2: No, that's fine, We're actually at the end of that.
Speaker 2: So now I'm gonna switch over to the eugenics aspect
Speaker 2: to Brand Eye here if I can find it.
Speaker 1: So so everybody who's watching and they're seeing it like
Speaker 1: grainy or whatever, maybe, but the connection is awful right now.
Speaker 1: I have been trying to fight with Century Link for
Speaker 1: last week and they told me that ten days it
Speaker 1: would take, and then they canceled my appointment because they
Speaker 1: told me they fixed it. And it's not obviously, so
Speaker 1: sorry if it's a little grainy, not the best quality
Speaker 1: picture today, But as long as you can hear us,
Speaker 1: that's what matters.
Speaker 2: Okay. So brand Brand Eyes and all over Wendell Holmes specifically,
Speaker 2: So these are two US Supreme Court justices, the two
Speaker 2: most honored guests at the House of Truth teen twenty
Speaker 2: seven nineteenth Street in Northwest Washington. This political salon that
Speaker 2: we talked about in which they game plan for flipping
Speaker 2: the definition of liberalism. This is where Mount Rushmore comes.
Speaker 2: They designed this all on the dining room table apparently. Okay,
Speaker 2: So this is again the House of Truth involved in
Speaker 2: forced sterilization and oh that's good, sort of the control
Speaker 2: of imbeciles and feeble minded. These phrases that are famous
Speaker 2: from the eugenics movement of the early nineteen hundreds.
Speaker 1: Things that never is discussed is who's making these determinations
Speaker 1: and why you could have somebody that is just a dissenter. Oh,
Speaker 1: they're not with it, just like the psychology psychiatry, right,
Speaker 1: if you have a mentalist, if you do not follow
Speaker 1: along with the agenda or with the society that they
Speaker 1: want to create, you're just pulled out of that society,
Speaker 1: put somewhere else, drug to tell, drug to hell, and
Speaker 1: then left like a shell of a human being. Well,
Speaker 1: they've ripped your solo through drugs.
Speaker 2: Yep. We're going to get into that too. This Buck
Speaker 2: versus bell as a President's setting case landmark decision of
Speaker 2: the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendel Holmes, Junior,
Speaker 2: in which the Court ruled that a state statute permitting
Speaker 2: compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, for
Speaker 2: the protection and health of the state, did not violate
Speaker 2: the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Speaker 1: Intellectually disabled so basically everybody that they're letting into the
Speaker 1: country right now than with a seventy IQ right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and then that's also one of these definitions that's obligatory.
Speaker 2: It's kind of like you can make up anything underneath
Speaker 2: a title like that. This is what they do a
Speaker 2: lot of the times, So Buck versus Bell. If anybody
Speaker 2: doesn't know this, this is a famous case in which
Speaker 2: this lady, your Carrie Buck, they.
Speaker 1: Determined, but he was He wasn't talking about killing people
Speaker 1: or taking He was just saying, you should be a
Speaker 1: little bit more responsible with your breeding habits. Who are
Speaker 1: you talking about, Tesla Nicola Tesla.
Speaker 2: Yes, yes, we get into this gray area where obviously
Speaker 2: it would be nice to not have I don't even
Speaker 2: know what the word.
Speaker 1: For, you know, Yeah, yes, eliminate.
Speaker 2: It's actually it's it's okay. But the means in which
Speaker 2: they're doing it, yeah, it's who's highly questionable.
Speaker 1: Yeah, again about the people. It's one thing when in
Speaker 1: society like ours, you can't have them have that power.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and again it's an honorable ideal, but is it
Speaker 2: even possible? Like the War on terror, the war on drugs,
Speaker 2: all of these things that they used to pose all
Speaker 2: of these laws. Are they even attainable like.
Speaker 1: Those find me go find me terror, go find me
Speaker 1: like people that cause terror? Yes, people who sell drugs, yes,
Speaker 1: but it's a one out of war on drugs. The
Speaker 1: drugs aren't the people that we're shooting. Aren't the things
Speaker 1: that we're shooting, right, It's not the things that we're
Speaker 1: putting in.
Speaker 2: Okay. So I got a quick video here on on
Speaker 2: this Buck versus Bell, and it's an amazing sort of
Speaker 2: She's the experimental first guinea pig. This is this first
Speaker 2: person that is used and forcibly sterilized.
Speaker 1: Oh nice.
Speaker 2: Now you can see this famous picture of the eugenics tree.
Speaker 2: I want to bring attention to this first of all
Speaker 2: before we start rolling, because when you look great, when
Speaker 2: you can you see that? Yes, okay, So, first of all,
Speaker 2: it says eugenics is the self direction of human evolution.
Speaker 2: Well that it tells it all.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah right.
Speaker 2: There's a feedback loop there, the collection of information and
Speaker 2: then the feeding it back as applied science to steer society.
Speaker 2: This is the age old problem we have. And when
Speaker 2: you look at all of the titles of those roots
Speaker 2: mental testing, nice, medicine, surgery, psychiatry. Sociology is the mother
Speaker 2: of all social sciences. But also included here you see education, economics, statistics, politics, law,
Speaker 2: and their geology, history, anthropology. Those are all social sciences today,
Speaker 2: their psychology testing.
Speaker 1: It's all through the scope of what they value. It's
Speaker 1: fascism by a different means, right.
Speaker 2: And genetics is interesting because if you go look at
Speaker 2: our future perfect articles, we get into the cybernetics revolution
Speaker 2: and William bates and who's Gregory Bateson's father. Gregory Bateson
Speaker 2: is involved in CIA. He's married to Margaret Meade. And
Speaker 2: this is the one of these two are two of
Speaker 2: the first four invitees to the first initial meetings that
Speaker 2: end up being MK Ultra. This is the Macy conferences
Speaker 2: in the thirties.
Speaker 1: And forties, Macy Conferences that was cybernetics prior to you MK.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, this is the predecessor, but the predecessor towards that
Speaker 2: is heredity. So this is what genetics was called prior.
Speaker 1: To being called genetics and gave land to that cybernetics
Speaker 1: program like they granted their land.
Speaker 2: Oh, they're deep involved and same with this genetics. William
Speaker 2: Bateson and the Rothschilds are together in the opening of
Speaker 2: these institutions that found genetics, and genetics is still just
Speaker 2: a theory as far as we're concerned. We researched this
Speaker 2: and it's again just propaganda. The wroth the representative that
Speaker 2: gave him the building was a roths Child and he
Speaker 2: was in the front row and he was applauding as
Speaker 2: they were opening all of this.
Speaker 1: Okay, So as an aside, am ily person who's irritated
Speaker 1: by the old way of writing where they use and
Speaker 1: instead of a in front of a word that starts
Speaker 1: with age like a harmonious entity. That doesn't They do
Speaker 1: that all the time though. I read older books and
Speaker 1: that happens all the time.
Speaker 2: And like a N in front of a word that
Speaker 2: starts with an H yeah rather than you know, oh
Speaker 2: I see at the bottom of them into it and
Speaker 2: heart yeah. It's a little bit of a tongue twister.
Speaker 1: They do that all the time with with H words.
Speaker 2: So we're gonna just let this roll. It was starting
Speaker 2: at the fifty second mark, and this is to do
Speaker 2: with the sterilization of Carrie Buck. This is the story
Speaker 2: of Buck versus Belt.
Speaker 4: X, or the ideological demarcation between quote unquote fit and
Speaker 4: quote unquote unfit reproduction drove the long history of for
Speaker 4: sterilization in the United States. Among the many states with
Speaker 4: eugenics legislation, Virginia is infamous for its legal campaign to
Speaker 4: forcibly sterilize carryback and thereby in trench sterilization abuse as
Speaker 4: the law of the land. The legislative framework that made
Speaker 4: possible carry box events.
Speaker 2: Here's the actual literature. And look at that. The New Family,
Speaker 2: so totally progressive again, like the New Freedom, new republic,
Speaker 2: new nationalism, new spirit, new history. Here's the New Family.
Speaker 2: So they are the progressives at this time are completely
Speaker 2: flipping our entire social contract. And who's at the helm
Speaker 2: really but brandeis all over Wendell Holmes, And we're going
Speaker 2: to show you that Walter Lippman's deeply involved. And we're
Speaker 2: going to show you how these guys all play different
Speaker 2: roles in the promotion of these ideas.
Speaker 1: Is it really necessary to enforce an uninhutted surgery on
Speaker 1: somebody who probably wouldn't have a very easy time finding
Speaker 1: a mate in the first place, right, you know, it's
Speaker 1: like or even at all, like, why would anybody be
Speaker 1: okay with forced surgery for any reason.
Speaker 4: Right ventral court order stylization took shape. In a single afternoon.
Speaker 4: On March twentieth, nineteen twenty four, the Virginia State legislature
Speaker 4: passed a series of devastating legislative initiatives. The Virginia Sterilization
Speaker 4: Act provided for the sterilization of people deemed quote unquote
Speaker 4: people minded or quote socially inadequate end quote too.
Speaker 2: I'm willing to bet that they would call either you
Speaker 2: or me that today. Right, this is what they they ridicule,
Speaker 2: conspiracy theorists and all of us that are actually doing
Speaker 2: respond contible research. But I wouldn't I've never been called
Speaker 2: feeble minded, But I wouldn't doubt that at some point
Speaker 2: that's the reason they got to call me into a
Speaker 2: tribunal or put me behind bars because I'm telling the truth.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, it's a it's a it's they can they
Speaker 1: don't have to go with the feeble anymore because they
Speaker 1: have psychology built up so strong. Yeah, you know, nationalism, patriotism,
Speaker 1: all these things are considered mental illnesses. Religiosity, all that.
Speaker 1: It's already in the it's already in the un verbiage.
Speaker 2: Too, yep, and it results in social inadequacy. We are
Speaker 2: socially inadequate for this society.
Speaker 1: Progressive society, yes.
Speaker 2: Radical, right, when we're talking social reform like this, this
Speaker 2: is radical social reform. This is even beyond progressivism to me.
Speaker 2: This is why we've traced this back to bohemian and
Speaker 2: the illuminati, because there's much darker things going on here
Speaker 2: than just a bunch of well to do progressives trying
Speaker 2: to you know, uh, be concerned with public.
Speaker 1: Yeah they're not just thanks, They're actually causing court decisions now, you.
Speaker 2: Know, Yeah, they're they're creating legislation and who but these
Speaker 2: US Supreme Court justice from the House of Truth.
Speaker 4: The broad categories that could be stretched to include virtually
Speaker 4: any institutionalized or socially marginalized.
Speaker 2: There you go, any socially marginalized.
Speaker 4: The Virginia racial integrity I mean.
Speaker 2: We are called the fringe quote minority.
Speaker 4: Ratified the idea of white purity by defining blacks as
Speaker 4: having won sixteenth or more Negro blood and peace as
Speaker 4: those having the same proportion of Indian blood end quote
Speaker 4: in the words of Dorothy Roberts. With its notions of
Speaker 4: racial purity, thus established the Racial Integrity Act also prohibited
Speaker 4: into racial marriage and specified that quote the clerk or
Speaker 4: deputy clerk shall withhold the granting of the license end
Speaker 4: quote until the Registrar's office established the racial classification.
Speaker 1: Of each appellate.
Speaker 2: There's your tribunal.
Speaker 4: These laws set the course for eugenics in Virginia. Just
Speaker 4: three years later, in nineteen twenty seven, a seventeen year
Speaker 4: old white girl named Carrie Buck was at the center
Speaker 4: of debates about the state sterilization law.
Speaker 2: This is just dialectics. The rest of the Virginia state.
Speaker 4: They could have used anybody sleptics and people minded. Where
Speaker 4: her foster family abandoned her when she became pregnant as
Speaker 4: a result of rape.
Speaker 1: Oh, she was pregnant for Bucks.
Speaker 2: FoST This is the official story, so we're not recommendation.
Speaker 4: A pregnancy out of wedlock was one of the quote
Speaker 4: eugenic symptoms of inherent immorality.
Speaker 1: And now as you watching, yeah, now it's the straight
Speaker 1: culture that they that they promote and they give you
Speaker 1: money for tapes from making babies.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and now I now I will also mention that
Speaker 2: in the last week we've seen where Dave girl from
Speaker 2: the Foo Fighters has come out and said that he's
Speaker 2: had a child out of wedlock and he's going to
Speaker 2: take care of it, and it's highly advertised. It's it's
Speaker 2: everywhere that I got right.
Speaker 1: Pardon, I'm sure he's a hero.
Speaker 2: This is how they're portraying him as a solid dude
Speaker 2: because he had sex out of his wedlock or you know,
Speaker 2: outside as a marriage and it resulted in a child,
Speaker 2: and he's going to be responsible enough to take care
Speaker 2: of it. Well, what about being responsible enough not to
Speaker 2: step outside your marriage?
Speaker 1: He's being Oh, he is married real and he's he's
Speaker 1: responsible and that's going to put a straight on it.
Speaker 1: And he's he's responsible enough not to want to be
Speaker 1: sued to have to do exactly what he's going to
Speaker 1: do anyway, which is provided.
Speaker 2: Right. This is what I was saying to my wife
Speaker 2: is like this. It's not the same when we talk
Speaker 2: about the rest of us. But you know, I'm willing
Speaker 2: to sterilize Dave girl.
Speaker 4: Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes upheld this view when he specified
Speaker 4: Buck couldn't.
Speaker 2: And Branda went with him, so you got controlled opposition.
Speaker 4: She is further incapacitated by congenital mental defect. End quote
Speaker 4: over Buck's objection, what recommended that she be sterilized because,
Speaker 4: according to the last line of their decision, quote three
Speaker 4: generations of imbeciles is enough end wow, but was still
Speaker 4: October nineteenth, nineteen twenty seven, soon after the Supreme Court's
Speaker 4: ominous run. Those are some series of letters from Brest
Speaker 4: to doctor John Bessiats, then a nurse, between nineteen twenty
Speaker 4: seven and nineteen thirty four, reveal her awareness that she
Speaker 4: was akin to a quote furloughed inmate on parole end quote.
Speaker 4: Until her marriage in nineteen thirty two, she remained a
Speaker 4: ward of her employers, who she provided live in domestic
Speaker 4: work for the paltry sum of five dollars a month.
Speaker 4: During this time, she could be recalled to the colony
Speaker 4: for any perceived infraction. After Carriebuck's for sterilization, the number
Speaker 4: of states with legal provisions for the sterilization of quote
Speaker 4: unquote feeble minded and quote unquote criminals ballooned. In several states,
Speaker 4: women were institutionalized at much higher rates than men for
Speaker 4: the express purpose of being sterilized. In the records available,
Speaker 4: women of color were forcibly sterilized at much higher rates
Speaker 4: than white women. For example, in North Carolina, African American
Speaker 4: women accounted for sixty five percent of those sterilized by
Speaker 4: the Eugenics Board between nineteen sixty four and nineteen sixty six,
Speaker 4: a rate more than five times their population representation. The
Speaker 4: issue of sterilization abuse and its disproportionate impact on women
Speaker 4: of color became a rallying point for feminists of color
Speaker 4: in the nineteen sixties and nineteen seventies.
Speaker 1: So they want the exact opposite direction with it. Centivize
Speaker 1: them now to have fifty kids and live on welfare.
Speaker 2: Then what's worse, right, It's it's better for the state,
Speaker 2: because that you know, that's the creation of the nanny state.
Speaker 2: As long as you're dependent on the government, man, they
Speaker 2: ain't going anywhere.
Speaker 1: Right, as long as you're draining the middle class who
Speaker 1: works for their family.
Speaker 2: Better commitment.
Speaker 4: Yeah, the group's mission statement is that socialists again quote
Speaker 4: issues in projects that collective members have actually worked on
Speaker 4: are sterilization abuse, abortion rights, battered women, rape, and healthcare.
Speaker 2: And now he's going to get into sort of what
Speaker 2: it looks like today too.
Speaker 4: They are the evolution of anti sterilization activism in their
Speaker 4: struggle Quote against racial sexual, heterosexual, and class oppression. End
Speaker 4: quote is instructive for challenging contemporary sterilization abuse and understanding
Speaker 4: the legacies of Carrybock sterilization after the Buck v. Bell
Speaker 4: ruling in nineteen twenty seven. While eugenic ideas have a
Speaker 4: long and troubling history in the United States, these beliefs
Speaker 4: continue to negatively impact people today. Existing laws continue to
Speaker 4: steal away reproductive autonomy and subject people to force sterilization.
Speaker 4: Hello coaturely women of color, disabled and incarcerated women yip
Speaker 4: plus for a second though, a report by the National Women.
Speaker 1: When you see it, when you see a Haitian chowing
Speaker 1: down on a cat or a bird like I've seen,
Speaker 1: or ripping one apart with their bare hands, they're not
Speaker 1: supposed to be here in the first place. And do
Speaker 1: we really want to multiply that? And I know this
Speaker 1: government wouldn't do anything about it, but I'm just saying
Speaker 1: it seems like there's some there's some advantages to this idea.
Speaker 1: I don't know about the four sterilization part, but maybe
Speaker 1: like hey, fuck out, you know.
Speaker 2: Well, you know when you get to the racism is
Speaker 2: about as inflammatory a term that there is in our society.
Speaker 2: Today and racism has really got a bad name. I mean,
Speaker 2: what are these people that come here, these new immigrants.
Speaker 2: I mean, we're all immigrants here, except you know, in
Speaker 2: the mid eighteen hundreds, we all shared the same religion,
Speaker 2: skin color, and usually we spoke the same language, and
Speaker 2: a lot of our values were parallel. Now it's completely opposite.
Speaker 2: You've got people that value completely different things, including religion coming.
Speaker 1: In here.
Speaker 2: Or the lack of values, right, and so that goes
Speaker 2: right in line with frankism. Right when we see these
Speaker 2: people eating cats and whatever. And I haven't looked into this,
Speaker 2: but I have seen some police body cam footage of
Speaker 2: a lady eating a cat, and so I don't.
Speaker 1: Know, Yeah, that's what that one was.
Speaker 3: She was.
Speaker 1: That's someone that they used to debunk because she was,
Speaker 1: you know, an American citizen. But I have I have
Speaker 1: the receipts on the other ones that were not. I've
Speaker 1: got the videos. Thank you to Joseph Polka for sharing those.
Speaker 2: Right, But you can be an American citizen these days
Speaker 2: pretty easy. And that's really what they're all coming here for.
Speaker 2: And so that is a non sequitur, right, It's it's
Speaker 2: a little bit of gaslighting. And that they've moved the
Speaker 2: argument there. It's like, no, these people with a disparate
Speaker 2: sort of background and value system are eating our pets.
Speaker 2: And then they try to get out of it by saying, well,
Speaker 2: that is an American citizen officially. Well, you know that's
Speaker 2: unimportant really, right. The importance is that they came from
Speaker 2: somewhere else and they have different values, and we're starting
Speaker 2: to see the problems that are going to arise. You know,
Speaker 2: we just saved a cat. A little girl came to
Speaker 2: our farm a couple of weeks and she's one of
Speaker 2: our neighbors. And I started walking up and down the street,
Speaker 2: but she wasn't saying anything, but she wasn't calling her cat.
Speaker 2: But she came into the farm and she said, do
Speaker 2: you guys, have you guys seen my cat? And I had.
Speaker 2: I was pretty sure that the cat we'd seen was
Speaker 2: from her house because he'd been hanging out, but the
Speaker 2: homeowners at our farm had been feeding the cat. So
Speaker 2: he's been hanging out at our place for a week
Speaker 2: ten days. And finally the girl came down and I'd
Speaker 2: never seen a happier girl when she got her cat
Speaker 2: and grabbed it and walked home. With her cat. So
Speaker 2: I can't imagine a scenario where somebody, a new immigrant,
Speaker 2: is eating somebody's family cat and the little girl that
Speaker 2: owns it comes along. I mean, this is highly.
Speaker 1: Just traumatic exactly. So Yeah, I love cat. I love
Speaker 1: my cat. Is awesome, my two cats, sure.
Speaker 2: I mean I have a cat. He's fourteen years old,
Speaker 2: and you know, tried to.
Speaker 1: Steal one of ours and I had a fight with them,
Speaker 1: and I'm not allowed on premise anymore because they kidnapped
Speaker 1: one of our family members, my daughter's cat, and then
Speaker 1: you know, they ransomed it back to us and they
Speaker 1: said you wouldn't come back until they he was old
Speaker 1: enough to be neutered. And I'm like, fuck you, no,
Speaker 1: you're not good. That's not gonna happen. And the woman
Speaker 1: who lived in our neighborhood, apparently who worked there, wanted
Speaker 1: it because she fostered it. So that's the reason why
Speaker 1: she took it in the first place, out.
Speaker 3: Of our yard.
Speaker 2: That's abusive authority. Yeah. And you know when we took
Speaker 2: our cat just recently to the vet man, did they
Speaker 2: push more antibiotics, a second wave of antibiotics and painkillers
Speaker 2: and stuff? And I said no, and They looked at
Speaker 2: me like I was beating the cat. But I know
Speaker 2: the cat. I've known this cat for fourteen years. I've
Speaker 2: been watching the little injury that he had, and it
Speaker 2: was healing up, and it was on its way to
Speaker 2: being healed, and it is healed now. And I didn't
Speaker 2: want to put any more antibiotics into this fourteen year
Speaker 2: old little man. He's already gone through enough. Right Yet
Speaker 2: they looked at me with condescending eyes. So you know,
Speaker 2: it's the same thing. These veterinarians are now starting to
Speaker 2: do the same thing that the medical industry is doing
Speaker 2: to humans. Just you know, you're pressuring people into taking
Speaker 2: more drugs.
Speaker 1: Yeah, for sure, crazy.
Speaker 2: We are, but it I walked out of there with
Speaker 2: my cat and I was like, no, no, he's gonna
Speaker 2: be fine. Like you know my cat for five minutes.
Speaker 2: I'm not going to allow you to start making determinations
Speaker 2: on It's like a hitchhiker jumping into my car and
Speaker 2: telling me where.
Speaker 1: To drive exactly. Who who ell do you think you are?
Speaker 2: The goal? And so you know, I was polite and
Speaker 2: nice and I said no, thanks, I don't need any
Speaker 2: of that and walked out of there. But you know,
Speaker 2: you have to kind of build up your defense as
Speaker 2: you're going in there to say nope, nope, no, nope,
Speaker 2: because you can walk out of there paying them five
Speaker 2: hundred bucks. And this is what they'll say, is that
Speaker 2: we need to fund the rental of our veterinarian clinic.
Speaker 2: It's like, we'll find another way. Yeah, that's remind then
Speaker 2: to just give my cat unnecessary medications to fill your
Speaker 2: pocket book to pay the rent.
Speaker 1: This is ridiculous with that false sentiment that you're doing
Speaker 1: it for the for the benefit of the of the animal.
Speaker 2: How progressive. Yeap, So there we are. I think that's
Speaker 2: fairly modern. That's probably something we can say is happening
Speaker 2: today that the force sterilization accepted by states, and then
Speaker 2: where forced sterilization is banned.
Speaker 1: Is this still current or is this just at that
Speaker 1: time during the twenties, And no, this is current.
Speaker 2: This is now. He's moved on to talking about how
Speaker 2: what it looks like today.
Speaker 1: So North Carolina and Alaska are the only places that
Speaker 1: have banned for sterilization.
Speaker 2: Apparently according to this now, I haven't researched that, and
Speaker 2: I I will, and I encourage everybody else to the
Speaker 2: other part here is the light purple that says it's
Speaker 2: not clear if forced sterilizing forced sterilizations are allowed. So
Speaker 2: what does that mean, Well, they're happening. I'm sure that
Speaker 2: they're not not doing it because it's not clear. Hey,
Speaker 2: we're aren't clear if we can force sterilization. Okay, well
Speaker 2: there therefore we can't do it. That is something that
Speaker 2: the government would never.
Speaker 1: Do, right then sUAS it leans towards whatever they decide
Speaker 1: they wanted to do in the first place.
Speaker 2: Yeah, outside of public purview? Do you really trust your government?
Speaker 4: Come on, come on, Women's Law Center and the Autistic.
Speaker 2: So there's twenty twenty one is the Dayton National Women's
Speaker 2: Law Center in the Autistic Women's non Binary Network. Okay,
Speaker 2: So that's the chart I wanted to show you because
Speaker 2: this all relates back to today. If you want to
Speaker 2: finish this video, it goes into more anecdotal evidences and
Speaker 2: other sterilization stories. Sure, okay. Now I want to get
Speaker 2: to this book that is entitled Imbeciles. Okay, and this
Speaker 2: is the book written on Era and what And I've
Speaker 2: just started going through this this morning and I'm completely
Speaker 2: blown away by what I found. It's it's extraordinary. Okay,
Speaker 2: So we're going to go to this book, Imbeciles the
Speaker 2: Supreme Court. What's the title. Let's go to it so
Speaker 2: everybody can see this. There's I see already in the
Speaker 2: first pages, there's quotes from the New Republic, right, so
Speaker 2: check the author the Supreme Court, American Eugenics and the
Speaker 2: Sterilization of Kerry Buck. Okay, so this is going deep
Speaker 2: into the story of Kerry Buck.
Speaker 1: Now once again, not Irish, yep, exactly, not one of
Speaker 1: my brethren.
Speaker 2: Okay, so you're I'll just word search brand Eyes through
Speaker 2: here and you'll see that he comes up quite a bit.
Speaker 2: Twenty seven results in a book called Imbeciles about the
Speaker 2: Supreme Court and Eugenics. Here's brande Ice playing a primary
Speaker 2: role again. And if he's outdone by anybody, it's Oliver
Speaker 2: Wendel Holmes Junior. Both of these guys, honored guests, set
Speaker 2: the house of truth. And so when I was researching,
Speaker 2: I was going through all of those twenty seven results independently.
Speaker 2: I found that Walter Liptman came up. So I searched
Speaker 2: his name in here thirteen results. Okay, now that is something.
Speaker 2: What would Walter Lippman be doing in here. Well, he
Speaker 2: is an influential ones.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yes, he is who.
Speaker 2: We consider today the founder of modern journalism. And what
Speaker 2: is he but a resident of the House of Truth
Speaker 2: along with Brandeis Oliver Wende Holmes and so here on
Speaker 2: this page two thirty eight, two thirty nine they mentioned
Speaker 2: the House of Truth. So it says there was, as
Speaker 2: it happened, an influential group of mostly young progressives who
Speaker 2: were prepared to help Holmes achieve the recognition he sought.
Speaker 2: The group, many of whose members were associated with Harvard
Speaker 2: Law School or the liberal leaning New Republic magazine, which
Speaker 2: we've shown. These are all founders of that magazine, admired
Speaker 2: Homes and thought he could be useful to their cause.
Speaker 2: Now this is how they used Homes. They compromised him
Speaker 2: by complimenting him, writing great articles about him in the
Speaker 2: New Republic. And so they just played to his vanity,
Speaker 2: and he became a fan of them, and they became
Speaker 2: a fan of his, and together they infiltrated the US
Speaker 2: Supreme Court or the US Constitution and started experimenting. This
Speaker 2: is openly admitted in all of their literature. So many
Speaker 2: of them lived in a or frequent at a row
Speaker 2: House at seventeen twenty seven nineteen Street in Washington's DuPont
Speaker 2: Circle that served as a kind of commune for young
Speaker 2: men in the government, and he was known as the
Speaker 2: House of Truth.
Speaker 1: They knew what the freak they're doing here. Look at
Speaker 1: this home paragraph or says Holmes. Early years on the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court were a time when many intellectuals were drawn
Speaker 1: to egenics, and Holmes was one of them. He was
Speaker 1: in many ways for the fertile ground for ideas. And
Speaker 1: they're talking about with a bunch of assholes like grand
Speaker 1: On throwing it in there, fertile ground.
Speaker 2: Yeah. If you go into Brad Snyder's book, The Host
Speaker 2: of Truth, you'll it's an incredible book. It's out in
Speaker 2: the mainstream. Brad Snyder works, of course at Georgetown now
Speaker 2: as a history professor, and.
Speaker 1: That's a ground for recruiting CIA Georgetown. That's just any
Speaker 1: run campus.
Speaker 2: And he originates from Madison, Wisconsin University, which is in
Speaker 2: the Midwest, and it's a key node along this progressive movement.
Speaker 2: A lot of these people first go to Madison, Wisconsin University,
Speaker 2: put in their time, and then they get put into
Speaker 2: greater roles more illustrious or prestigious roles. I would say
Speaker 2: he would rather be at George Town University in Washington,
Speaker 2: then he would be in Milwaukee. So at the center
Speaker 2: of the group is that where I finished. The group's
Speaker 2: influence on Holmes's reputation was so great that one legal
Speaker 2: scholar dubbed it the host that built homes, and he
Speaker 2: called himself Mephistopheles. You can go to Bulletproof pub dot
Speaker 2: com and go scroll down past the podcast we did
Speaker 2: for the Rise of the Experts series and you'll see
Speaker 2: all of our other articles, and there's one there called
Speaker 2: the Host of Truth and the Devil's Agent, and that's
Speaker 2: where we go into how they infiltrated him and influenced
Speaker 2: Oliver Wendo Holmes. Okay, and you look into his father too,
Speaker 2: and you start to see that there's an ominous continentity. Yep.
Speaker 2: So at the center of the group were two men
Speaker 2: who were themselves close friends. Felix Frankfurter, a Harvard Law
Speaker 2: School graduate who would go on to join the law
Speaker 2: school faculty and then the Supreme Court, and Walter Littmann,
Speaker 2: an influential columnist and the co founder of the New Republic.
Speaker 2: So He's not just an influential columnist, he's the father
Speaker 2: of modern journalism. He had one of the longest syndicated
Speaker 2: columns in American newspaper history, called Today and Tomorrow. There's
Speaker 2: no mention of yesterday. So this is how you can
Speaker 2: see in their language that it's all progressive. So the
Speaker 2: denizens of the House of Truth were unhappy with the
Speaker 2: Supreme Court's anti labor rulings in particular, and were eager
Speaker 2: to push it in a more liberal direction, meaning more government,
Speaker 2: more central more centralization, and building up of the administrative
Speaker 2: or nanny state. This is the definition of liberalism today
Speaker 2: when it wasn't then. You know, liberal then, at least
Speaker 2: according to the Constitution, had an emphasis on our ability
Speaker 2: to think and speak freely. So a classic definition of
Speaker 2: liberalism has been pushed off to the side, and now
Speaker 2: we have neoliberalism, which is radical social reform progressives. Now
Speaker 2: I blogged three or four neoliberals democrats yesterday because I
Speaker 2: was sharing this progressive stuff, and they are completely offended
Speaker 2: by being called progressive. But then I show them that neoliberal.
Speaker 2: The term was coined by progressives Walter Lippmann, specifically at
Speaker 2: the Walter Lippmann Colloquium in nineteen thirty eight in Paris
Speaker 2: where he was hanging out with leading economists Friedrich von
Speaker 2: Hayek and Ludwig von Misis and all of the world's
Speaker 2: most influential economists, and they coined the term neoliberal. So,
Speaker 2: you know, this whole movement of support of black lives matter,
Speaker 2: in this social justice movement, it's all created here in
Speaker 2: the progressive era. So these are radical progressives when they
Speaker 2: call themselves democrats, even they're voting for Kamala Harris or Biden,
Speaker 2: they're almost all exclusively progressives without even knowing it. This
Speaker 2: is the mind trick that uh really toppled America.
Speaker 1: This is going to have roots in the certain tribe
Speaker 1: every time too, because this is one of their tools
Speaker 1: that they used to erode societies, Yes, to weaken them
Speaker 1: as a parasite would.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So and they all I've asked them to define
Speaker 2: what liberalism means to them, and they'll often come back
Speaker 2: with having an open mind.
Speaker 1: Well, there's people that actually care about the strength of
Speaker 1: the nation that they might project that way, but it's
Speaker 1: the exact opposite, yep.
Speaker 2: And so you know they're open minded. They claim to
Speaker 2: be open minded. But there is again a gray area
Speaker 2: or a line that you will cross where being open
Speaker 2: minded is a little too much. And now we are
Speaker 2: seeing it with LGBTQ only to this push against male
Speaker 2: and female and uh, you know, a fall into a
Speaker 2: degeneracy that totally echoes Germany, Weimar Republic and even you know,
Speaker 2: Russia itself all at the same time.
Speaker 1: Let's not let's not, uh forget the fact that the
Speaker 1: lg g bt H J J. Klem people should also
Speaker 1: kick up in the doors for uh this idea that
Speaker 1: we're going to normalize pedophilia. Sure, and I don't say umbrella.
Speaker 1: So now it's protected because then you're a bigot if
Speaker 1: you if you challenge it, right yep.
Speaker 2: And then there's bestiality after that coming people. M that's
Speaker 2: the plot of the Department. That's the cull to sack.
Speaker 2: That's the end of the road. It ends abruptly there,
Speaker 2: and it's having sex with animals right now.
Speaker 1: They're just needing them.
Speaker 2: So we got a little So once this influential group
Speaker 2: adopted homes, the pages of the New Republic and the
Speaker 2: Harvard Law Review began to fill up with accolades for
Speaker 2: their new hero now, who are the editors and creators
Speaker 2: of Harvard Law Review in the New Republic? But brandeis Lippmann,
Speaker 2: Herbert Crowley, the author of the Promise of American Life,
Speaker 2: leading progressive. This is the manifesto of progressivism, Crowley. They're
Speaker 2: all living at the House of Truth. So on March eighth,
Speaker 2: nineteen sixteen, when Holmes turned seventy five, the Law Review
Speaker 2: dedicated an issue to the occasion when Holmes dissented in
Speaker 2: a pair of cases in which the Supreme Court struck
Speaker 2: down progressive labor legislation, a federal ban on child labor
Speaker 2: in Hammer versus Daggenheart and a few late years later,
Speaker 2: a federal minimum wage law for women in Adkins versus
Speaker 2: Children's Hospital. The New Republic lavishly praised his Hammer descent
Speaker 2: and reprinted the Adkins Descent in its entirety. So they
Speaker 2: are the bullhorn. They are the voice of progressivism. Originally
Speaker 2: created to be the voice of Theodore Roosevelt. The story is,
Speaker 2: according to mainstream that Theodore Roosevelt had no interest in
Speaker 2: experimenting on the US Constitution, so they stopped following him
Speaker 2: and stopped supporting him. And this is when they started
Speaker 2: as a sport Woodrow Wilson.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he still used they still he still participated in
Speaker 1: weakening the election by you know, the whole bull Moose party.
Speaker 1: Though that he still serves a function, Yes, bring us
Speaker 1: to Wilson, and he did it with well and with
Speaker 1: with a with a quite complete complete awareness of what
Speaker 1: he was doing. I mean, maybe his own his own
Speaker 1: ego made him think he was actually intended to win,
Speaker 1: but I don't think so. Yeah, he lied about his
Speaker 1: his escapades and wars and stuff like that, right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, So that's what I got for today. This
Speaker 2: is an extension of this society being governed by the
Speaker 2: scientific expert. It's quite shocking, in fact, to read a
Speaker 2: book that's called Imbeciles about the eugenics program and see
Speaker 2: so many citations to brandeis Lipman Holmes and this House
Speaker 2: of Truth crew. So I remind you that we've already
Speaker 2: shown that three of the four members that were in
Speaker 2: the room and the creation of Israel were Hosts of
Speaker 2: Truth members, and now we're showing that they're deeply involved
Speaker 2: in the sterilization, the forced compulsory sterilization of human beings.
Speaker 1: Okay, So, which is kind of a strange in a
Speaker 1: sense because I mean there's some overlap there that makes sense,
Speaker 1: and there's some overlap there. How they paint what was
Speaker 1: going on in Germany in but skewing it of course.
Speaker 1: So it's just I don't know, it's it's just very
Speaker 1: it's just very odd how many things that brandeis It
Speaker 1: was at the center of and not only the center.
Speaker 1: It seems like he was selecting and directing. Oh for sure,
Speaker 1: he was with the with the Rothschilds. It's his deep ties.
Speaker 1: I mean he was their guy for everything and.
Speaker 2: When there so when they brought labor and capital together,
Speaker 2: this is one of the main This is the whole
Speaker 2: plot of Metropolis, by the way, bringing labor and capital together,
Speaker 2: and in the end, the guy that brings him together
Speaker 2: is the hero. So Brandis, you know, when it comes
Speaker 2: to bringing labor and capital together in nineteen ten, he's
Speaker 2: actually the lead attorney. He walks into a room of
Speaker 2: attorneys and takes control, and so you know, he's got
Speaker 2: great influence. You know.
Speaker 1: I think that he is one of those people who
Speaker 1: is probably very mild and mannered, and he's probably also
Speaker 1: very intelligent, but I think he cast a very scary
Speaker 1: shadow because people knew who he was involved with or
Speaker 1: something like that.
Speaker 2: So that was exactly what I was just going to say,
Speaker 2: because when you look at and actually, let's do this.
Speaker 2: Let's see if I can figure this out here, because
Speaker 2: we can go over the creation of Israel because people know.
Speaker 1: Had to know that the Federal Reserve was pretty much
Speaker 1: the end of our government, you know, our control, our independence,
Speaker 1: and they must have known the dark hands that were
Speaker 1: at work there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so this may be a little clunky and a
Speaker 2: little awkward. Let's see if I can figure this out,
Speaker 2: because to go through that actually is important. I'm just
Speaker 2: not sure if I'm going to be able to.
Speaker 1: Actually interesting to see. You know, it almost is like
Speaker 1: a bunch of people scurrying to please the new master
Speaker 1: in this time period and get things done as quickly
Speaker 1: as they could, like, regardless of what they may have
Speaker 1: luke warmfelt about the nation before. As soon as things
Speaker 1: started to turn the other side, it's like they jumped
Speaker 1: on that wagon instead and abandon their principles.
Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, I agree, And now hopefully I do this right.
Speaker 2: I can show you sort of my filing system, my
Speaker 2: folder system. I've never let anybody inside of my research,
Speaker 2: but I I don't mind doing that. Here, let's see
Speaker 2: if I can do it.
Speaker 1: Can't show you watching besides starta. I know that they
Speaker 1: are now.
Speaker 2: They got all my information anyways, collecting my key strokes
Speaker 2: for sure. So okay, so here's my brand Eye folder.
Speaker 2: You can see how I've been collecting here. Can you
Speaker 2: see that my folder system? Yeah, so you can see
Speaker 2: that I've got an extensive folder situation here on a
Speaker 2: lot of things. And this is just my brand.
Speaker 1: Eye Fabian Freeway.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, this is an incredibly important book to read
Speaker 2: as well.
Speaker 1: Yea, economists. Now are we talking about the publication that's
Speaker 1: put out by the Rothschilds the economy.
Speaker 2: Yeah, oh it's a yeah, it's an article on brand
Speaker 2: Eyes from the economists. Let's look at the facts, you
Speaker 2: see that Now, facts are subjective people. I see a
Speaker 2: lot of people misusing the word facts because they are manipulable.
Speaker 1: Right, and determined by whatever they say the sciences at
Speaker 1: the time, without having like, let's see the validation of
Speaker 1: that experiment before you tell me that's a fact.
Speaker 2: Right. So in the Zionism folder and in Documents on
Speaker 2: British Foreign Policy nineteen nineteen and nineteen thirty nine.
Speaker 1: Well, that's kind of a small folder, the part about Zionism.
Speaker 1: It's like sixteen page folders inside of folders.
Speaker 2: It is. And so this has really allowed me to
Speaker 2: have a clear mind as to what's going on. You know,
Speaker 2: all of the books that were written about Brandie and Zionism,
Speaker 2: I've collected each page and highlighted and underlined all of
Speaker 2: the important stuff. So here's an example. Okay, So this
Speaker 2: is important. This is the story of Israel. Okay, And
Speaker 2: it's right in line with the scientific expert And you're
Speaker 2: going to see just how influential brand Eiz is here. Okay.
Speaker 2: So it's a memorandum by Felix Frankfurter of an interview
Speaker 2: in mister Balfour's apartment on June twenty fourth in Paris.
Speaker 2: So this is during the Paris Peace Conference. So the
Speaker 2: Balfour Declaration is dated November second, nineteen seventeen. Well, Brandeize
Speaker 2: sees that there may be some some pulling back by
Speaker 2: the British government and the other governments in wanting to
Speaker 2: help him create this Jewish homeland in Palestine, and so
Speaker 2: he decides he's going to Palestine to do some personal research.
Speaker 2: And it so coincides with the Paris Peace Conference and
Speaker 2: he drops in to say hello to all of his buddies.
Speaker 2: And here's the story of how Israel was created. Make
Speaker 2: his presence shelter, yes, yes, and it's not his influence,
Speaker 2: but it's the Rothschild's influence. And we've already shown that
Speaker 2: a lot of the decisions made at Paris, we're already
Speaker 2: done through the inner Allied conferences and those into the
Speaker 2: inter Allied Club is owned by the Rothschilds. And a
Speaker 2: lot of these decisions were made on rothschild Land while
Speaker 2: at their mansions eating breakfaster, lunch or dinner.
Speaker 1: Yeah, even this passed through. It was pushed by the
Speaker 1: raw milk scare that Rothschild's were put impressing. Yes, so,
Speaker 1: mister Rothschild.
Speaker 2: You look, you look, who's present, Mister Balfour, mister Justice
Speaker 2: Brand It's Lord Eustace Percy and mister Frankfurter. Eustace Percy's
Speaker 2: also a Resident of the House of Truth. And now
Speaker 2: that's strange because he is a member of the British Parliament.
Speaker 2: He is like the right hand man of the British
Speaker 2: Prime Minister David Lloyd George him and Lord Lothian to
Speaker 2: key members of the Roads Roundtable, Roads both living at
Speaker 2: the House of Truth when they were in Washington doing
Speaker 2: foreign policy work. And so that's very strange too now
Speaker 2: that what that means is that three of the four
Speaker 2: people that were there in the creation of Israel were
Speaker 2: House of Truth residence. So mister belfour expressed great satisfaction
Speaker 2: that Justice Brandeis came to Europe. He said, the Jewish problem,
Speaker 2: of which the Palestinian question is only a fragment but
Speaker 2: an essential part, is to his mind as perplexing a
Speaker 2: question as any that confronts the state statesmanship of Europe.
Speaker 1: Sorry, I was just going to ask if the Russell
Speaker 1: Trust comes up at all in any of this or
Speaker 1: of research that you'd do.
Speaker 2: With. Well, Russell's Age Foundation is throughout all of it.
Speaker 2: They are actually funding a lot of the literature, the
Speaker 2: books that are being created. So I invite people to
Speaker 2: go into part two scientific management. I think we delve
Speaker 2: into the National Consumers League there and yep, though it's
Speaker 2: all totally funded by.
Speaker 1: Skull and Bones yep.
Speaker 2: So he is exceedingly distressed by it and her harassed
Speaker 2: by its difficulties. Mister Balfour rehearsed summer summarily the pressure
Speaker 2: on Jews in Eastern Europe and said that the problem
Speaker 2: was of course complicated by the extraordinary phenomenon the Jews
Speaker 2: now are not only participating in revolutionary movements, but are
Speaker 2: actually to a large degree leaders in such movements. He
Speaker 2: stated that a well informed person told him only the
Speaker 2: other day that Lenin, also on his mother's side, was
Speaker 2: a Jew. Now that's true. We know now, over one
Speaker 2: hundred years later, that's true. Now. What they're saying there
Speaker 2: is that in my mind, and they're talking about the
Speaker 2: movements that are going on like the Bolshevik Bolshevik Revolution
Speaker 2: and then the Armenian genocide, that's what I believe that
Speaker 2: they're talking about run by Jews.
Speaker 1: Exactly Islam, not by Muslims. And they were Frankists, they
Speaker 1: were the young Turks, the leaders that ranked.
Speaker 2: Oh there's an admission.
Speaker 1: They were Sabotins. They weren't Francaus. They were Sabatins who
Speaker 1: became the doma.
Speaker 2: Yeah, right, so there you have an admission. You know,
Speaker 2: when you get into the books of the time, they
Speaker 2: will say things and speak in certain ways that really
Speaker 2: enlighten you as to where they were at the time
Speaker 2: in their in their brains, and this just gets better.
Speaker 1: And they're still guarded, which is funny. Even the corresponds
Speaker 1: between them, like it's like they were careful enough to
Speaker 1: say things in a certain way that you'd have to
Speaker 1: you have to really pry into it to really understand that.
Speaker 1: But they're actually flying.
Speaker 2: That's a sopian, the use of a soapian language where
Speaker 2: it has two meanings but only the initiated know what
Speaker 2: you're saying. Yeah, so in like enforced, it's you know, yeah,
Speaker 2: so enforced Gump. When Gump gives his the girl that
Speaker 2: he was in love with, I don't remember Jenna Jenney. Yeah,
Speaker 2: uh he Actually, when you go look at that movie,
Speaker 2: he actually forms the position of Bapphamet. He says peace
Speaker 2: to her, but his other hand is pointing down with
Speaker 2: a peace sign. So anyways, just a side note, So
Speaker 2: Justice Brandei stated that he had every reason to believe
Speaker 2: that this is not something and that Lennon on both
Speaker 2: sides is an upper class Russian. Well, that's proven to
Speaker 2: be totally false. His mother was a Jew, which makes
Speaker 2: him technically a Jew. That was the one.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, that's that's actually how they identify it to
Speaker 1: it's on the mirror.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's the one that matters. It's paternal, not maternal.
Speaker 1: Apparently they said the same thing about Trump too, because
Speaker 1: everybody's like, oh, his father was a blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: And I was like, well, you don't even need to
Speaker 1: go that direction because apparently his mother was. I don't
Speaker 1: know if this is truet.
Speaker 2: Oh, that's interesting. I would love to check that out.
Speaker 2: But he's most it's certainly a Zionist, absolutely Trump, I mean,
Speaker 2: his most favorite, his most favorite award he has on
Speaker 2: his wall admittedly was the one that he got from
Speaker 2: the Zionist group.
Speaker 1: He's he gave a key to the White House to
Speaker 1: as you know, token gift to Nan Yahoo.
Speaker 2: Right, And he has entertained Krabbad Lubovich just like every
Speaker 2: other president going back to.
Speaker 1: I hope they washed that day, don't they just a
Speaker 1: lot once a week And when they all stand around
Speaker 1: you at a desk, it's.
Speaker 2: Like, yeah, right, didn't they smell the sulfur? Carter was
Speaker 2: the first president to entertain Kraabad in the Oval Office.
Speaker 2: Another side note there is to pay attention to the
Speaker 2: desk that's in the Oval Office. That'll tell you a lot,
Speaker 2: but wouldn't get into that later. So he continued. Brandeised
Speaker 2: it that after all, this is a minor matter whether
Speaker 2: Lenin was a Jew or not. Of course, that all
Speaker 2: that mister Balfour said was quite so. He believes every
Speaker 2: Jew is potentially an intellectual and an idealist, and the
Speaker 2: problem is one of direction of those qualities. He narrated
Speaker 2: his own approach to Zionism that he came to it
Speaker 2: wholly as an American, for his whole life had been
Speaker 2: free from Jewish contacts or traditions. This is true. He
Speaker 2: changes his middle name and becomes a Zionist leader in
Speaker 2: his sixties. So as an American he was confronted with
Speaker 2: the disposition of the vast number of Jews, particularly Russian Jews,
Speaker 2: that were pouring into the United States year by year.
Speaker 2: It was then that, by chance, a pamphlet on Zionism
Speaker 2: came his way and led him to the study of
Speaker 2: the Jewish problem and to the conviction that Zionism was the.
Speaker 1: Answer mankind's problem. And that would be, yeah, a Jewish problem.
Speaker 1: Jewish problem means that the nations, because that's what gentiles
Speaker 1: really meant, right, So that means like all other things
Speaker 1: except for them is their enemy.
Speaker 2: And this is a problem that's gone on for centuries.
Speaker 2: So you know, let's not forget the saying where there's smoke,
Speaker 2: there's fire, mainstreamers and armies if you've dared to watch
Speaker 2: us today. So the very same men with the same
Speaker 2: qualities that are now enlisted in revolutionary movements would find
Speaker 2: in the United States do find constructive channels for expression
Speaker 2: and make positive contributions to civilization in a liberal context,
Speaker 2: in a more centralizing of the government, the vis quality
Speaker 2: of opportunity or a quality of outcome rather than aquality
Speaker 2: of opportunity. Mister Balfour interrupted to express his agreement, adding,
Speaker 2: of course, these are the reasons that make you and
Speaker 2: me such ardent Zionists. The Justice continued that for the
Speaker 2: realization of the Zionist program, and that program is spelt
Speaker 2: with an MME at the end, three conditions were essential. First,
Speaker 2: so brandeis is laying down the conditions that we will
Speaker 2: accept the area that you want to give us, but
Speaker 2: it has to be on three conditions. First, that Palestine
Speaker 2: should be the Jewish homeland, and not merely that there
Speaker 2: be a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Well, it has to
Speaker 2: be the place, not just a place for them to
Speaker 2: hang out. That he assumed. That he assumed is the
Speaker 2: commitment of the Balfour Declaration and will of course be
Speaker 2: confirmed by the Peace Conference.
Speaker 1: So basically, the reason why we're supporting it not supposed
Speaker 1: to scrutinize this is because it's already been decided a
Speaker 1: long time ago that the Palestinians had to go and
Speaker 1: completely yes.
Speaker 2: And it gets very interesting here in this.
Speaker 1: Yeah, at the highest level, it's already been decided. Just
Speaker 1: like the public Law eighty seven two ninety seven this
Speaker 1: says were to be just armed. It's a law, a
Speaker 1: public law, right.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So secondly, there must be economic elbow room for
Speaker 2: a Jewish Palestine. So they're using the word Palestine here,
Speaker 2: by the way, self sufficiency for a healthy social life.
Speaker 2: That meant adequate boundaries, not merely a small garden within Palestine.
Speaker 2: On the north. That meant the control of the of
Speaker 2: the waters. And he assumed that Great Britain was urging
Speaker 2: the northern boundary necessary for the control of the waters.
Speaker 2: That was a question substantially between England and France, and
Speaker 2: of course must be determined by the peace conference.
Speaker 1: You know, they're gonna they're gonna if they succeed in
Speaker 1: what their plan is, then they're not gonna have anybody
Speaker 1: left the torture except for themselves, and it's gonna be
Speaker 1: very boring. There's not gonna be anybody to leach off of,
Speaker 1: and they're not gonna be able to make it anything.
Speaker 2: And nobody else to blame anymore. But by then they're
Speaker 2: hoping that we're just such automatons that we don't question history,
Speaker 2: and everything's down the rabbit hole and there's no way
Speaker 2: you can prove any thing. That's what I would say, So.
Speaker 1: Leonard Cohen song in my head the future, there's no
Speaker 1: one left tun.
Speaker 2: You know, we took Leonard Cohen classes in I must
Speaker 2: have been English in high school. It's interesting.
Speaker 1: I have a Buddhist I think something like that.
Speaker 2: So mister Belfour sented that that was so as to
Speaker 2: the southern boundary, but questioned as to the eastern boundary.
Speaker 2: So there's questions between the French and British regarding boundaries.
Speaker 1: When did the Greater Israel project become you know, visualized,
Speaker 1: because I'm thinking it was it was part of the plan. Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: I think this, this whole idea of the Zionist state
Speaker 1: was also because I what I know about the Francis,
Speaker 1: it was always created to one day be a burnt
Speaker 1: offering of Jews who they kind of gathered there the
Speaker 1: first place. So it's part of their freaking Talmut and
Speaker 1: Kimbala crap, and it's all part of the Frankest and
Speaker 1: Cybotine and Francis stuff that Zionism is really just another
Speaker 1: word for what you know, Frank has tried to cover for,
Speaker 1: and it's a I think it's happening soon that there's
Speaker 1: going to be something going on. Either they're going to
Speaker 1: provoke somebody to attack them, or they're gonna false flag themselves,
Speaker 1: and then they'll be all new uproar of victimhood, all
Speaker 1: refreshed again for this era, and everybody who says anything
Speaker 1: against it is going to be severely punished. And there's
Speaker 1: going to be not too much time for that anyway,
Speaker 1: because then they're going to go scorged to earth freaking
Speaker 1: Samson option style on whoever they decide they want to
Speaker 1: do that too.
Speaker 2: Yep, you know. And I think those protests at the
Speaker 2: American Universities serves as a dialectic and now they can say,
Speaker 2: look at all this rising anti Semitism, We're going to
Speaker 2: have to stop it. And at the same time they
Speaker 2: are instituting anti Semitic laws, preparing for just such a day.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and Trump is leading the old in his brick.
Speaker 1: He's leading that charge, talking about death penalties and stuff.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So the Justice so here we start to see
Speaker 2: how Justice Brandize is influencing the Foreign Secretary of the
Speaker 2: British government. Got he's even higher than him. So this
Speaker 2: is where you say that, you know, he comes as
Speaker 2: a rothschild agent, and it's not necessarily because he's a
Speaker 2: US Supreme Court justice that he's intimidating people and taking
Speaker 2: a lead role here, even over Arthur Balfour. But it's
Speaker 2: the Rothschilds that are supporting him, behind him, just like
Speaker 2: Cecil Rhodes.
Speaker 1: Just give us what we want, have the bridge to
Speaker 1: do it.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So the Justice added that, of course the interests
Speaker 2: of the hedgeazz were involved, but after all the disposition
Speaker 2: of questions between the Arabs and the Zionists was in
Speaker 2: effect an internal British problem. He urged Brandeis did on
Speaker 2: the east the trans Jordan line, for there the land
Speaker 2: is largely unoccupied in settlement could be made without conflict
Speaker 2: with the Arab It's much more easily than in the
Speaker 2: more settled portions of the north. So mister Belfour pointed
Speaker 2: out that in the east there is the hedge Azz railroad,
Speaker 2: which can rightly be called the Mohammedan Railroad. The Justice
Speaker 2: replied that there is a land right up to that railroad,
Speaker 2: and mister Belfour stated that he thought that Faisal, the
Speaker 2: guy that gets totally screwed here, would agree to having
Speaker 2: an eastern boundary of Palestine go up to the Hedgeazz railroad.
Speaker 1: I just realized you're reading from a bigger page that
Speaker 1: you could see, right, We're still seeing all the little pages.
Speaker 1: Oh shoot, yeah, it's fine. I just I've been, you know,
Speaker 1: staring at the little squares.
Speaker 2: But it's okay, let's try this. It's good. So then
Speaker 2: I have to share the actual tab.
Speaker 1: Yeah's another thing. I'ncle back, you know what I mean?
Speaker 1: How do you want to do it? Well?
Speaker 2: I want to. I want people to read along and
Speaker 2: see that this is actually something that's happening. So window
Speaker 2: that's my.
Speaker 1: I heard that the last video and I was starting
Speaker 1: what it was.
Speaker 2: She's very patient. She's just sitting here right beside me.
Speaker 2: This is her rest day. She's usually going so solid
Speaker 2: at the farm and the other six days of the
Speaker 2: week that she actually appreciates the wednesdays that we sit.
Speaker 1: Do you have like a goat or sheep or anything
Speaker 1: like that.
Speaker 2: No, we used to have chickens. We had five chickens
Speaker 2: were inside city limits, so we kept it small.
Speaker 1: But I knew I knew somebody who had vineyards and
Speaker 1: in order to keep the grass down between the rows,
Speaker 1: they would have the good trees there.
Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, yeah, that's what they do. Okay, let me
Speaker 2: see the folders aren't coming up all of a sudden.
Speaker 1: I actually lived on a vineyard for a short period
Speaker 1: of time. I rented a house from the guy. Was
Speaker 1: really nicely what do you call it, like landscapes, trees
Speaker 1: that like made an arc into the driveway and stuff.
Speaker 1: Was top of the mountain in Ramona. It was nice.
Speaker 1: Then I went to jail.
Speaker 2: What Yeah, you went to jail.
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Why am I allowed to ask that on live recorded? Yeah?
Speaker 2: You can.
Speaker 1: California police officer decided that I was drunk when I wasn't,
Speaker 1: and I got to uy oh, wow, and it was.
Speaker 1: He said, you were doing erratic driving. There's two turns
Speaker 1: into a hotel circle. I realized I didn't go to
Speaker 1: the what I wanted to do, so I turned my
Speaker 1: blinker off and kept going. But he was following me
Speaker 1: from the beach and he thought he just assumed that
Speaker 1: I was drinking, So that's what he went with. After
Speaker 1: three hours of sobriety test and an alcohol thing I
Speaker 1: can lie about anyway, like a blood test, they forced
Speaker 1: me to do a blood test after the breathalyzer and
Speaker 1: then still put me on so I ended up going
Speaker 1: to jail. I didn't realize that I didn't have representation
Speaker 1: because there was a lawyer next to me, but that
Speaker 1: was just somebody that stands in California is different than
Speaker 1: New York. If there's nobody, if you don't have a
Speaker 1: lawyer and there's nobody standing next to you, so I
Speaker 1: assumed that I had somebody there and I didn't.
Speaker 3: So that was that.
Speaker 2: Yes, I've been in similar situations, Hey cops, Yeah, there's
Speaker 2: been more.
Speaker 1: Seven vehicles of mine took him, just took him.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they have an authority about them. They visited me
Speaker 2: at the farm twice this year. And made sure that
Speaker 2: I left the farm because because of exactly what I'm
Speaker 2: showing here today, I told the landowner that we were
Speaker 2: leasing from that Israel was created by a US Supreme
Speaker 2: Court justice, and that was it. Ye. But I am
Speaker 2: still getting on the farm. My wife has been there
Speaker 2: full time and I've been helping out, and we're just
Speaker 2: about done. Actually, we got four weeks left in our
Speaker 2: harvest box and that'll be the end of the year.
Speaker 1: You have to wet one those rubber masks that make
Speaker 1: it look like somebody else.
Speaker 2: I actually thought about dressing up and going in disguise.
Speaker 2: I did, and I get sneaked in by our golf
Speaker 2: cart and I'll just put a bag over me and
Speaker 2: we'll drive in.
Speaker 1: You know, just just uh fly fly a rainbow flag
Speaker 1: on your golf cart and she won't even notice it
Speaker 1: was you. She just figured that you're one of the
Speaker 1: libok like herself. Yeah, there it is.
Speaker 2: For whatever reason. Now it shows I think I have
Speaker 2: to actually click on it and engage in it, and
Speaker 2: then it shows up in that screen for me to grab.
Speaker 2: Mm hmm.
Speaker 1: Okay, so box that you have to click in. Yeah,
Speaker 1: So when you're in the freezent screen. When you go
Speaker 1: to share screen and you click entire screen and then
Speaker 1: there's a box to the left. You got to click
Speaker 1: that and then the blue share button will pop a
Speaker 1: little light up. Is that what you're talking about?
Speaker 2: Yeah, nope, okay, different that I have these folders and
Speaker 2: they're down in my tool box at the bottom on
Speaker 2: my toolbar, and so they don't come up if they're
Speaker 2: in the toolbar. But if I click on it and
Speaker 2: bring it up like I have here, then it actually
Speaker 2: shows up in the middle one the window.
Speaker 1: Gotcha.
Speaker 2: Okay, so you guys can all read that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, no, that's nice and crystal to full size?
Speaker 2: It is that better? It's good? All right? So here
Speaker 2: we go. So they here is the Foreign Secretary of
Speaker 2: Britain having a conversation with the Justice capital j No
Speaker 2: need to say anything else. It's like he's prince or sting.
Speaker 1: And mister Balfour has to express agreement to what he
Speaker 1: lays out as the conditions.
Speaker 2: Yep or lebron right, He's just this is the influence
Speaker 2: he has the Justice. That's all they refer to. Mass
Speaker 2: So Thirdly, the Justice urged that the future Jewish Palestine
Speaker 2: must have control of the land and the natural resources
Speaker 2: which are at the heart of a sound economic life. Wow. Okay,
Speaker 2: and what does Brandeis do but founds the Palestine Economic
Speaker 2: Corporation works hand in hand with the Rothschild's PICA, the
Speaker 2: Palestine Israeli Colonization Association.
Speaker 1: Well, that's what they're doing. This is they're they're colonizing
Speaker 1: that they don't even own this land and that's not
Speaker 1: even there people who actually reside there. And this is
Speaker 1: like British colonialism in Palestine because they're like, yeah, we're
Speaker 1: just going to take this and fuck you and your resources.
Speaker 1: A ry Now yep.
Speaker 2: And I had arguments with progressives yesterday who didn't like
Speaker 2: any of this information and you know, I just showed
Speaker 2: them this information here and they don't like it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they don't like receipts because then they have to
Speaker 1: they still have to delve back on their pre programmed rhetoric.
Speaker 1: It's always about oppressions. It's not about they what they've
Speaker 1: researched themselves. It's the impression that they have that they
Speaker 1: believed and that they've parroted without ever looking into and
Speaker 1: when you question that, it's like questioning their identity. It
Speaker 1: is never based on anything that they actually found on
Speaker 1: their own yep. Always someone else that they're just it's
Speaker 1: like a repeater, like when you have a radios, it's
Speaker 1: it's broadcasting it further. That's how they are.
Speaker 2: Yep, because they've personally identified with the movement and made
Speaker 2: it a personal thing. Yeah. Okay, so when they say, oh,
Speaker 2: it was never called Palestine and it's not a colonization program,
Speaker 2: it's like the companies, the corporations that built it were
Speaker 2: called Palestine Colonization Association. Stop it right, learn your history.
Speaker 2: You're annoying. So there you go have. They must have
Speaker 2: control of the land and the natural resources. So where
Speaker 2: does that leave the Arab Semi? It was essential that
Speaker 2: the values which are being and will be created because
Speaker 2: of the cessation of Turkish rule and due to British occupation,
Speaker 2: occupation and Jewish settlement should go to the state and
Speaker 2: not into private hands. So now you're seeing that they
Speaker 2: knew that they had to overthrow the Ottoman Empire in
Speaker 2: order to get the land that they wanted, and once
Speaker 2: they did that, then it was just a matter of
Speaker 2: you know, diplomacy.
Speaker 1: M Yeah, and going back to the schools of Columbia
Speaker 1: and stuff like that that was just a way for
Speaker 1: them to control what they are anticipated as in opposition
Speaker 1: to what they were doing in Palestine. So let's make
Speaker 1: it about a bunch of liberal idiots. That way, anybody
Speaker 1: that associate that, you can associate anybody who wants not
Speaker 1: not to see genocide happen as being a liberal, and
Speaker 1: then you can call people liberals, and then you can
Speaker 1: you know, get the get the stronger side of the
Speaker 1: argument against humanity, because obviously the stronger side would be
Speaker 1: the rational thinking people who actually can put two thoughts together,
Speaker 1: who realize that it's wrong. Now they're so stupid because
Speaker 1: they see that something liberal that they're going to go for. Hey, yeah, Israel, Right,
Speaker 1: it's the matter with you people.
Speaker 2: Yeah, as long as it's liberal, they're gonna they're gonna
Speaker 2: have an open mind to it. Yeah, the moment that
Speaker 2: you start showing them this, they are no longer open minded.
Speaker 1: And the people who consider themselves conservative are going to
Speaker 1: be pro genocide just because that's what the liberals like,
Speaker 1: The liberals like to to to save these people. So
Speaker 1: that must be in opposition to us.
Speaker 2: And this is really to liberal. It's meant to liberalize
Speaker 2: the entire world. This is their plan going to Paris.
Speaker 2: This is why the American delegation doesn't have one Republican
Speaker 2: or Conservative in their population. It's a huge group of Americans,
Speaker 2: but they're all Democrat progressives. So they establish a world
Speaker 2: of liberalism. This is really what we need to understand,
Speaker 2: is that they're trying to make everybody liberal in the
Speaker 2: new definition of liberalism, meaning supporting centralized government as an
Speaker 2: answer to everything. So mister Balfour expressed entire agreement with
Speaker 2: the three conditions which the Justice laid down. So he
Speaker 2: then proceeded to point out the difficulties which confronted England.
Speaker 2: He narrated at length the Syrian situation and the appointment
Speaker 2: of the Inter Allied Commission, which finally terminated in the
Speaker 2: present American Commission. So the inter Allied Commission, they and
Speaker 2: so this is where the Fabians are. You can go
Speaker 2: look at our work. We've shown that this inter Allied
Speaker 2: Commission was chaired by Sydney Webb and one of the
Speaker 2: main influencers was George Bernard Shaw. They're there, Lipmann is there.
Speaker 1: Of course he's there. He's got to write it all out.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So Faisal was a comrade in arms with the British.
Speaker 2: So he was actually fighting with them, is that what
Speaker 2: they're saying. Not sure? Uh. He undoubtedly was of military help,
Speaker 2: and by sheer force of events, the British and the
Speaker 2: Arabs find themselves together in Syria. Faisal interpreted British action
Speaker 2: and British words as in effect a promise either of
Speaker 2: Arab independence or of Arab rule under British protection. So
Speaker 2: they he's assuming that he's going to get what the
Speaker 2: Jews end up having.
Speaker 1: Mh.
Speaker 2: And this is what Psych's Pico does. It flips it
Speaker 2: and Frankfurter helps you all of that in I think
Speaker 2: it's the Google Guggenheim mission that goes to Israel.
Speaker 1: You go ahead and secure that land and then you
Speaker 1: just then you hand it to the to the app
Speaker 1: someone else or in your enemy or whomever. Right, you're
Speaker 1: the one who's on the ground making it happen. But yep, oh,
Speaker 1: thank you, thank you for you know, claiming that putting
Speaker 1: this the flag in the ground. But it's not going
Speaker 1: to do you know, you just you just served us.
Speaker 1: You didn't serve what you thought you're It's great.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And that's that's the famous quid pro cool and I'm,
Speaker 2: you know, this close to saying that the whole war
Speaker 2: was started for the purpose of founding Israel.
Speaker 1: So I mean that's joining Germinat, there's there's there's a
Speaker 1: lot of there's few different reasons, and you know, the
Speaker 1: expansion of Bolshevism and all that other stuff. Well, the
Speaker 1: bag designs war for sure. For control, I.
Speaker 2: Mean control of the oil, the Baghdad to Berlin railway,
Speaker 2: but also the main Rhine Danube canal that goes across
Speaker 2: central Europe. These were all key aspects that you know,
Speaker 2: it was all about economics.
Speaker 1: Once they had the Federal Reserve in here and they
Speaker 1: had the rothschild control as they did, they were and
Speaker 1: by nineteen thirty three we were all collateral. This was
Speaker 1: no more country. Then it was time for them to
Speaker 1: make their make their move toward world in global domination.
Speaker 1: And I'm going to say that we're already under that
Speaker 1: one world order because of so many banks that are
Speaker 1: actually controlling countries, that countries and their names have no
Speaker 1: meaning anymore, taking the same orders and playing the world
Speaker 1: stage Jesuit theater type of thing for the people. But
Speaker 1: it's already we've already lost since World War two, we're
Speaker 1: seeing it slowly being implemented since then, and it's it's
Speaker 1: not going to take a war of words to get
Speaker 1: it back. It's going to take a whole lot more
Speaker 1: than that.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And so you look at Woodrow Wilson's two terms.
Speaker 2: The first four years, it was all about domestic reform
Speaker 2: because they had to make America ready and able to yeah,
Speaker 2: condition the mines. Well, they had to interact with this
Speaker 2: new international model they're going to create. So America is
Speaker 2: going to be the leader for the twentieth century. It's
Speaker 2: going to be the American century. So we have to
Speaker 2: make America easily adaptable to this new system that we're
Speaker 2: going to create. So the first four years, you're right,
Speaker 2: is all the domestics, the Federal Reserve, the Federal Trade Commission,
Speaker 2: all of this, and then the four years of a
Speaker 2: second term are all really international. It's meant to now
Speaker 2: establish and bring internationalism together with the American way. And
Speaker 2: it culminates at the Paris Peace Conference in nineteen nineteen
Speaker 2: where they establish everything.
Speaker 1: And of course they had to demonize the hell out
Speaker 1: of Russia. I was out of Germany and its leader,
Speaker 1: because that was a very big example of how independence
Speaker 1: from them can make you flourish, and how nationalism is
Speaker 1: a tool, a weapon against it against them, and they
Speaker 1: couldn't have that, so they had to demonize him throughout
Speaker 1: history because they don't want anybody to even look that
Speaker 1: direction and get any ideas for how they liberate themselves.
Speaker 2: And the fact that Germany had all kinds of natural
Speaker 2: resources within their boundaries made them a threat to the
Speaker 2: entire European.
Speaker 1: Want their industry to get any to be competitive with Britain.
Speaker 1: That was one of the big deals.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and what happened after the Treaty of Versus, but
Speaker 2: the French were allowed to go into Germany for fifteen
Speaker 2: years and extract whatever they wanted.
Speaker 3: Yep.
Speaker 2: So this last paragraph here and then on to the end.
Speaker 1: As part of their debts. The same thing with the
Speaker 1: natural resources anywhere. That's why you see you know China,
Speaker 1: China quote unquote, who basically was controlling or buying the
Speaker 1: debt from Canada. Now they have full access to all
Speaker 1: their resources. And I would say that maybe some of
Speaker 1: the reasons why the pipelines were cut down here was
Speaker 1: you know, you can say environmental disks and environmental ad
Speaker 1: that it's probably because somebody else already owns it. We've
Speaker 1: already right, you know, if you knew how the type
Speaker 1: of debt were in, it's probably because we don't have
Speaker 1: resources technically, because they're gone now there right under somebody
Speaker 1: else's control.
Speaker 2: They're indebted to somebody else. So the situation is further
Speaker 2: complicated by an agreement made early in November nineteen eighteen
Speaker 2: by the British and French and brought to the President's attention,
Speaker 2: telling the people of the East that their wishes would
Speaker 2: be consulted in the disposition of their future. Now, I
Speaker 2: believe that is psych's pico. So one day in the
Speaker 2: Council of Four, when the Syrian matter was under dispute,
Speaker 2: the President suggested that there's a dispatch of a commission
Speaker 2: to find out what the people really wanted. Now that
Speaker 2: is the Guggenheim Frankfurter led mission that actually stops in Gibraltar,
Speaker 2: and that's it. That's as far as it goes. So
Speaker 2: it began with Syria, but the field of inquiry was
Speaker 2: extended over the whole East. Mister Balfour wrote a memorandum
Speaker 2: to the Prime Minister David Lloyd George and he believed
Speaker 2: it went to the President pointing out that Palestine should
Speaker 2: be excluded from the terms of reference because the powers
Speaker 2: had committed themselves to the Zionist program again double me,
Speaker 2: which inevitably excluded numerical self determination. So the argument of
Speaker 2: self determination on sheer numbers the Arab Semitic speaking population
Speaker 2: easily wins. They are at seven hundred thousand. This is
Speaker 2: what Balfour states in this piece of literature, that there's
Speaker 2: seven hundred thousand Arabs in comparison to whatever the number
Speaker 2: was of Hebrew. But even today there's five hundred million
Speaker 2: Arabs Semitic speaking people there. In comparison there's about ten
Speaker 2: million Hebrew. Hebrew is about the fourth largest population. Yet
Speaker 2: they claim Semitic ownership of it all when they call
Speaker 2: somebody an anti Semite.
Speaker 1: Don't right exactly. I was about to make that statement.
Speaker 1: It's like nobody ever says anti Semite. He thinks Muslim.
Speaker 2: And I show and I say, there's seventy seven branches.
Speaker 2: You're the anti Semite, and they will not talk to
Speaker 2: me again, they'll blalk me and they'll leave because that
Speaker 2: is the truth. And so you can see Balfce stating
Speaker 2: here that we can't determine self or we can't give
Speaker 2: self determination on the numbers because the jew won't get it.
Speaker 2: We are dealing not with the wishes of an existing community,
Speaker 2: but are consciously seeking to reconstitute a new community and
Speaker 2: definitely building for a numerical majority in the future. They
Speaker 2: want to outnumber them there, see what's going on there
Speaker 2: right now people.
Speaker 1: So there's two ways to do that. You bring more
Speaker 1: people in or you reduce their population.
Speaker 2: Yep. And I think that you know, when you look
Speaker 2: at that seven hundred thousand back in the day of
Speaker 2: Arabs and like ten thousand Hebrew, you look at that
Speaker 2: number today seven hundred thousand or sorry, five hundred million
Speaker 2: in comparison to ten million. They haven't really been able
Speaker 2: to gain any ground as far as out birthing them.
Speaker 2: So what are you gonna do. There's only one option
Speaker 2: to eliminate them, and that is what's happening today. And
Speaker 2: you can see that it's stated in nineteen nineteen.
Speaker 1: Although my page is going off. Okay, no, no.
Speaker 2: Pajer Bom, I heard about that. It's funny how you
Speaker 2: can try to stay away from the mainstream, but you
Speaker 2: still pick up little nuggets along the way.
Speaker 1: Yeah, people, your stuff would be that serious. So I
Speaker 1: know stuff.
Speaker 2: And so they stayed there. And it's worth stating again
Speaker 2: we are dealing not with the wishes of an existing community,
Speaker 2: but are consciously seeking to reconstitute a new community and
Speaker 2: definitely building for a numerical majority in the future. So
Speaker 2: when you look at the Balfour Declaration and it says
Speaker 2: in there it clearly being understood that nothing shall be
Speaker 2: done to the already existing or no, nothing shall be
Speaker 2: done to prejudice the civil and religious rights of the
Speaker 2: already existing non Jewish communities in Palestine. So there's a
Speaker 2: direct contradiction when you read that sentence right there that
Speaker 2: we've read twice, and then you look at the Balfour Declaration,
Speaker 2: the resulting document that comes from these meetings, you can
Speaker 2: see that they declare something officially publicly, but privately they're
Speaker 2: saying no, no, no, no, no, we're going to This has
Speaker 2: nothing to do with the wishes of an existing community there.
Speaker 2: We are going to reconstitute a new community and we're
Speaker 2: going to out birth them, or we're going to become
Speaker 2: the majority there someday in the future. Here we are
Speaker 2: one hundred years later and they're still not. So you
Speaker 2: can see that they got to create genocide. They have
Speaker 2: to kill large numbers of these people at one time
Speaker 2: in order for them to ever have a majority. So
Speaker 2: we go to the final page. So on the other side, Sorry,
Speaker 2: are you seeing that page now? You are? Oh, okay,
Speaker 2: hang on, let me do that again. That was pretty smooth.
Speaker 2: And then I screwed it up.
Speaker 1: Give it down.
Speaker 2: So let's see.
Speaker 1: Let's see he was on there today. Good things are climbing.
Speaker 2: Good case. Third page with any doction of self determination,
Speaker 2: he asked the Justice how he thinks the president will
Speaker 2: do it. The Justice replied that mister Belfour had already
Speaker 2: indicated the solution, and pointed out that the whole conception
Speaker 2: of Zionism as a Jewish homeland was a definite building
Speaker 2: up for the future as means of dealing with a
Speaker 2: world problem, and not merely with the disposition of all
Speaker 2: already existing community. Mister Belfour stated he supposed that Mister
Speaker 2: belfore stated he supposed that that would be the president's line.
Speaker 2: He continued to point out the great difficulties that are
Speaker 2: now besetting Great Britain in the East, namely the ferment
Speaker 2: in the whole Eastern world, the Mohammedan restlessness, the new
Speaker 2: Arabic imperialism, and the relations with the French. Then there
Speaker 2: is also the Psyke's Peako Agreement that is dead, but
Speaker 2: it's ruins still encumber the earth. He was anxious that
Speaker 2: the Justice show should know these difficulties, for they all
Speaker 2: bear upon the Palestinian situation. So this is why Balfour
Speaker 2: and Brandeis are getting together right after America declares war
Speaker 2: in nineteen seventeen. Balfour expresses interest in meeting Brandeis specifically
Speaker 2: more than anybody else once he got to Washington, and
Speaker 2: this is why, because they had to inform him of
Speaker 2: everything that's going on before decisions are made. Now, that
Speaker 2: isn't in credible because that puts the Justice in a
Speaker 2: leading role above everybody.
Speaker 1: Exactly, and makes no sense the continuity of like you know, hierarchy.
Speaker 1: But it does if you know who he's involved with.
Speaker 2: It all makes sense when you understand the Rothschilds are involved,
Speaker 2: and they're the ones donating the land, and they're involved
Speaker 2: in all of this back and forth cabling and the
Speaker 2: final authoring of the Balfour Declaration. So the Justice hoped
Speaker 2: that while he was away. This is incredible. The Justice
Speaker 2: hoped that while he was away at least nothing would
Speaker 2: be done which would embarrass the fulfillment of the three
Speaker 2: conditions which he laid down as essential to the realization
Speaker 2: of the Zionist program. He is telling Balfour, don't screw
Speaker 2: this up while I'm.
Speaker 1: Gone, right, That was a threat.
Speaker 2: Then stated that he understood Justice Brandis's request that no
Speaker 2: decision be taken as to the boundaries in the extent
Speaker 2: of control over the land in any way counter to
Speaker 2: his views until his return in about four or five
Speaker 2: weeks from Palestine. He thought it was perfectly safe to
Speaker 2: give him the assurance that no decision will be taken
Speaker 2: and to those matters during that time to embarrass the
Speaker 2: aims which the Justice indicated. Mister Belfour stated that he
Speaker 2: would be either in Paris or in London when the
Speaker 2: Justice returned, and he hoped that he will report to
Speaker 2: him at once upon his return on the questions as
Speaker 2: they appeared to him from a study on the spot.
Speaker 2: So no statesman could have been more sympathetic than mister
Speaker 2: Belfour was with the underlying philosophy and aims of Zionism
Speaker 2: as they were stated by mister Justice, Brandeis nor more
Speaker 2: eager that the necessary condition should be secured at the
Speaker 2: hands of the Peace Conference and of Great Britain to
Speaker 2: assure the realization of the Zionist program.
Speaker 1: Did any of these pages, sorry, did any of these
Speaker 1: pages come from from Nick when he was doing his Uh? Nope, yeah,
Speaker 1: no the Liverary.
Speaker 2: No. And I have actually a pH d in history
Speaker 2: that we are now talking on Facebook, and he's he
Speaker 2: was talking to me about these papers. I already knew
Speaker 2: of them, and he's actually I can't remember his name
Speaker 2: right now, but he's important. He did a he did
Speaker 2: a really great study on all of this, but from
Speaker 2: a PhD university position, and so it's really good. I'll
Speaker 2: share it on Facebook with anybody that wants it.
Speaker 1: And what are you on for his books? So people don't.
Speaker 2: Uh diego Garcia?
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 2: So he it was a two hundred minute article that
Speaker 2: he'd written as a PhD in the university system on
Speaker 2: Brandeis because he'd seen, you know, a little bit about
Speaker 2: Brandeis and started asking questions similar to the questions we ask.
Speaker 2: But he's only been in he's only investigated Brandeis in
Speaker 2: the Zionist era. Which which means that he's only investigating
Speaker 2: one chapter of the ten chapter Rise of the Expert
Speaker 2: and all of the other areas that brandis has right.
Speaker 2: And so I indicated that a little bit to him
Speaker 2: a couple of days ago, and he's promised to look
Speaker 2: more into our work.
Speaker 1: So this is really where yeah, and this is already
Speaker 1: passed where we're at here, because it's already in motion,
Speaker 1: if you're saying, the Zionist era. So he doesn't even
Speaker 1: know how integoate he was into the developing of this.
Speaker 2: Yep, he didn't know that he coined the term scientific management.
Speaker 2: He didn't know anything about sociological jurispurdons, at least as
Speaker 2: far as I know. But these things came as a
Speaker 2: surprise to him, and so we just I told him
Speaker 2: that this guy is the maker of our modern day
Speaker 2: social contract, the literal matrix. It's more than just Zionism.
Speaker 2: He's influencing across the board. And so he's promised to
Speaker 2: look into our work. And what this is, people, is
Speaker 2: how a PhD gets in.
Speaker 1: Your way, right right right, because you've it one way, well,
Speaker 1: you have.
Speaker 2: A vested interest, You are within a framework of a story,
Speaker 2: and you know he's all, he's using all the same
Speaker 2: sources we are, except we aren't encumbered by perversion of authority.
Speaker 2: We don't have anybody that's controlling what we're going to
Speaker 2: say and telling us what we can't say. We are
Speaker 2: just in a journey towards the truth, trying to find
Speaker 2: exactly what happened in the real history. And so you
Speaker 2: can see that his PhD got in the way too.
Speaker 1: Right, because I mean, there there could be just this
Speaker 1: impression that you get where direction they're saying. Okay, so
Speaker 1: the meat, the meat of this particular story is in
Speaker 1: this this this uh timeframe, So you don't look for
Speaker 1: anything else. You look for that section. You get enough
Speaker 1: out of there, but you don't know what else happened before.
Speaker 1: It could just be just as simple as you know,
Speaker 1: the blinders being here because you're expecting to find something here,
Speaker 1: but you weren't even aware that there'd be more previous
Speaker 1: to that, and how that led up and all that stuff.
Speaker 1: So it's a lot easier to the guide people if
Speaker 1: they don't think that they're being guided, you know.
Speaker 2: Yes, m and so he was surprised about the House
Speaker 2: of Truth. He'd never heard of that, but this is
Speaker 2: really the focus. This is the nexus, the genesis, ground
Speaker 2: zero of the Progressive era movement.
Speaker 1: This gets me, huh, I said, the whole idea of
Speaker 1: the name House of Truth really gets me. Yeah, more
Speaker 1: inversion of every single word.
Speaker 2: Yep, and that you know, I'm not sure. There's a
Speaker 2: a few hypothesis on why they named it the hust
Speaker 2: of Truth there. We can go into that one day.
Speaker 2: But you know, this is all about Greek allegory or
Speaker 2: you know, knowing.
Speaker 1: The juice that's right, Just like they're.
Speaker 2: Naming these DARPA programs about stories you would never know
Speaker 2: or come in contact with unless you are studying the classics.
Speaker 1: But they're in fact that that archetype, that energy every time.
Speaker 1: They do that to empower their their programs and their
Speaker 1: their missions.
Speaker 2: Right. So that's about all I have. We've actually gone yeah,
Speaker 2: over two hours. So I'm going to continue to investigate
Speaker 2: down this avenue. Uh And I've got a radio broadcast
Speaker 2: with RBN on Friday night at eight pm. I'm going
Speaker 2: to probably go through this again, depending on which direction
Speaker 2: they want to go. But I'm going on with Lurk
Speaker 2: from Texas and he's he's really investigated the communitarian angle
Speaker 2: of all of this, and he said that you know
Speaker 2: they're using the same language there. You know, knew this
Speaker 2: and knew that. And so on Friday night, we're going
Speaker 2: to try to clarify and bring the two I eight
Speaker 2: ideas together and see if there's parallels in common ground
Speaker 2: between the American progressive movement and the communitarian movement, which
Speaker 2: I'm sure. I mean, I've already seen these things. So
Speaker 2: it just gets further more interesting with each week that
Speaker 2: passes by. With more research, we're delving into more surprising
Speaker 2: details as to just how the progressive movement infiltrated our society.
Speaker 2: And so what we're going to try to do is
Speaker 2: show you what it looks like today, because this is
Speaker 2: how you're going to be able to see the echoes
Speaker 2: of history and then say, Nana, we screwed up once,
Speaker 2: We're not going to do it again. So this is
Speaker 2: the importance of history, so we don't condemn ourselves to
Speaker 2: repeating it over and over. We see that actually happening
Speaker 2: right now, that there's a large segment of the television
Speaker 2: public that are progressives without even knowing it, and they
Speaker 2: are falling to these spells, these blag black magic spells
Speaker 2: that are filled with kind words like sustainability. So we're
Speaker 2: going to continue down that road and we'll bring further
Speaker 2: investigations next week as to know our further findings. And
Speaker 2: I very good encourage everybody to drop in and see
Speaker 2: Daniel and yeah, well support Daniel and is pursuit of
Speaker 2: a new computer? People?
Speaker 1: What time is RB young?
Speaker 2: Is that broadcast going on eight pm Pacific? You have
Speaker 2: is there a linked yep, I'll provide a link. There
Speaker 2: is a link if you go or you're not on Facebook,
Speaker 2: so I can send you one. I'll send you the
Speaker 2: link and then you can listen. And yeah, we just
Speaker 2: had our first broadcast last Friday night.
Speaker 1: If you want me to drop it into the chest
Speaker 1: so people can save it.
Speaker 4: Or m.
Speaker 1: I gotta go get I'm gonna go on Facebook and
Speaker 1: look for diog.
Speaker 2: Do you have a Facebook account? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Okay, I hardly ever use it, but I do. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm on the Politician. Yeah okay, so Urbion is a
Speaker 1: little bit an actor.
Speaker 2: Oh any other interesting thing, dude, is that I can't
Speaker 2: share it on Facebook because I'm in Canada. So I
Speaker 2: posted a screen shot where I say hey everyone, because
Speaker 2: I'm in Canada. This link can't be shared, but I
Speaker 2: advertise ERBIAN and the Republic Broadcasting Network in the show
Speaker 2: on Friday Night controlled up and then it's control of
Speaker 2: one of my friends, Liz Elms, was awesome enough to
Speaker 2: grab the link and shared in the comment section. So
Speaker 2: let's see if I can actually share that link.
Speaker 1: Just make sure get dirtied up by being on RBN.
Speaker 1: That's all they get some controls up going on over there.
Speaker 1: N Yeah, oh, I don't know about this particular broadcaster,
Speaker 1: but yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean it seems to be okay, but you
Speaker 2: know who knows, and.
Speaker 1: Just don't just design through the dark side.
Speaker 2: My friend, they've been oh you know, they allowed me
Speaker 2: to say whatever I wanted to say. I don't know
Speaker 2: if it's meant to incriminate me, but I'm going to
Speaker 2: continue to move forward and not be affected by any
Speaker 2: of the bullshit because that's the only way we're going
Speaker 2: to win. And so if you give me an opportunity
Speaker 2: to speak, I'm going to speak. If Joe Rogan followed
Speaker 2: me tomorrow, I would definitely go on because it gives
Speaker 2: me all kinds of influence, and you know, I can
Speaker 2: start and I can start to show how Rogan himself
Speaker 2: is fulfilling the role of the political philosopher, much like
Speaker 2: Walter Lippman did one hundred year years ago to influence society.
Speaker 1: So I put it in the live chat for Rumble
Speaker 1: and I put in the live chat for FTJ Media.
Speaker 1: So if you're don't know that, there's a what you
Speaker 1: call a box there bottom right hand coinner on FTJ Media,
Speaker 1: there's a little thing that looks like a little you know,
Speaker 1: thought cloud. It's green. I think you click it and
Speaker 1: it opens up and you'll see the link in there.
Speaker 1: All right, all right, awesome, cool.
Speaker 2: Yeah, all right, Well eat everything you've done for me,
Speaker 2: Daniel and allowed me to come on and talk these
Speaker 2: Wednesday mornings have been awesome.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I have a great time with it. It's
Speaker 1: a lot of fun. I like when we the three
Speaker 1: of us also work together on stuff that's really cool.
Speaker 1: And yeah, so I look forward to next week. Hope
Speaker 1: you have a good Friday this coming Friday.
Speaker 2: Right, Yes, we're uh, we're going to do this Friday
Speaker 2: and then we're not sure what it's going to be,
Speaker 2: but we'll see where it goes.
Speaker 1: Cool, all right, but well, I thank you again for
Speaker 1: your time, and we were running off right now, guys,
Speaker 1: you know what to do as far as the links
Speaker 1: in the description. Also, I just want to remind you
Speaker 1: that last night I did a simulcast broadcast of Doctor
Speaker 1: Peter Glidden's We got a couple more members through that
Speaker 1: the subscription thing, which I highly encourage. There's a cuypot
Speaker 1: clip for fifty percent off. Supports the show, which supports
Speaker 1: doctor Glidden of course, and it supports you because then
Speaker 1: you have access to that information that will help you
Speaker 1: improve your health and well being for you and your family.
Speaker 1: All Right, that's it