Speaker 1: This is Dan Caples and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. It says, to
Speaker 1: save America, that's the American way, right, to save America
Speaker 1: when it's under threat, and obviously it is under threat
Speaker 1: right now as a secular left is causing so much
Speaker 1: harm to this nation. And can you imagine not only
Speaker 1: another four years, but four years with Kamala Harris at
Speaker 1: the helm rights. So the time is now eight five
Speaker 1: to five for zero five eight two five to five,
Speaker 1: the number takes d an five seven, seven three nine.
Speaker 1: So many reasons to be optimistic, so much to talk
Speaker 1: about today. Now, is there a potential problem? Is there
Speaker 1: a new potential challenge? Yes, and we've got to be
Speaker 1: honest about that, and we've got to keep an eye
Speaker 1: on it and see if it does in fact turn
Speaker 1: into a last second curve ball that could impact the election.
Speaker 1: So we'll talk about that in a second. But in
Speaker 1: the positive category, yeah, there is much starting with that
Speaker 1: Joe Rogan interview, and I understand Rogan is long form,
Speaker 1: and I normally don't watch his stuff because it's three
Speaker 1: hours at a time. But I made it almost all
Speaker 1: the way through the three hours with Rogan and Trump,
Speaker 1: and so glad Trump did that. I think Ryan at
Speaker 1: this point, what it is twenty five million plus thirty
Speaker 1: four Uh beautiful because you know Trump pushed so good
Speaker 1: so often in that three hours, and obviously Rogan's audience
Speaker 1: is big audience. Yeah, huge payoff there. And Rogan kept
Speaker 1: saying he thinks Kamala Harris may go on the show.
Speaker 1: We'll see if she does that this week is kind
Speaker 1: of a last ditch hel Mary in an odd phrase
Speaker 1: to use, right for a Kamala Harris campaign when we
Speaker 1: have not had a candidate more openly hostile to Catholicism
Speaker 1: I think in modern times if ever. But yeah, so
Speaker 1: will she go on last ditch a bid? We will
Speaker 1: find out. I don't think she will fare well in
Speaker 1: that three hour format, whereas Trump is kind of built
Speaker 1: for it. But one of the reasons why I wish
Speaker 1: everybody could hear it is and it left me so
Speaker 1: encouraged for this hope for a second term, is that
Speaker 1: you know, he was so often so sharp and quick
Speaker 1: and smart in that and you can just see in
Speaker 1: a second term where where an awful lot of very
Speaker 1: good things could happen, and obviously surrounding himself with a
Speaker 1: lot of very good people. So I'm very excited for
Speaker 1: this second term if we get it, as I expect
Speaker 1: we will. So we'll be talking about that. We'll be
Speaker 1: playing some sound from the Rogan interview. So a real
Speaker 1: highlight there. You know, big mistake by the Democrats on
Speaker 1: Friday night with this Beyonce thing where they had it
Speaker 1: was implicit that she was going to perform in Texas.
Speaker 1: They had this huge, huge crowd turnout, remember just like
Speaker 1: the DNZ when Beyonce was supposed to perform and they
Speaker 1: use that lie to attract this huge TV audience and
Speaker 1: then she didn't show up. Does that have anything to
Speaker 1: do with not getting a vote post convention bounce? Who knows.
Speaker 1: But not a good look for the Democrats on Friday
Speaker 1: night in Texas for that. Conversely, Trump having just not
Speaker 1: only the Rogan interview but lots of other great events,
Speaker 1: and that of course brings us to Sunday night. We'll
Speaker 1: talk about that in a second. More positives for Trump obviously,
Speaker 1: the polling will give you the latest rundown on that,
Speaker 1: but it shows what you already know, just extremely tight races,
Speaker 1: with Trump gaining not by leaps and bounds, but trending
Speaker 1: Trump's way in the swing States, trending more so Trump's
Speaker 1: way in most of the national polling, not all, so
Speaker 1: you know that trend has continued. That brings up the
Speaker 1: question of whether this enormous mistake yesterday at a rally
Speaker 1: that was so full of so many great things, But Ryan,
Speaker 1: I think it is the third stupidest thing, the third
Speaker 1: biggest political mistake in modern American history. The first biggest
Speaker 1: political mistake was the Democrats inserting Kamala Harris, but Biden
Speaker 1: kind of outmaneuvered them there and forced it because he
Speaker 1: wants whoever replaced him to lose, right, So you put
Speaker 1: that number one. A close second would be selecting Tim
Speaker 1: Walls over Josh Shapiro. Just a totally mind blowing, thank
Speaker 1: you lord, enormous political mistake by the Democrats. Unfortunately, the
Speaker 1: third biggest political mistake of our lifetime, at least our lifetime,
Speaker 1: maybe all of American history, may have been whatever idiot,
Speaker 1: whatever moron decided to put that idiot. That moron Tony
Speaker 1: Hinchcliffe is at his name onto the agenda at this
Speaker 1: Trump rally. I say, this Trump rally was in many
Speaker 1: ways spectacular, but you really have to wonder personally, and
Speaker 1: I'm not making an any allegations. I don't know this
Speaker 1: to be fat but you have to sit back and
Speaker 1: you have to wonder whether Hinchcliff this so called comic
Speaker 1: and he's known as a quote insult comic. I wasn't
Speaker 1: aware Ryan there was that specific category, you know, I
Speaker 1: mean Dangerfield did his thing, but Don Rickles, Yeah. But
Speaker 1: anyway that this Hinchcliff guy, you have to wonder did
Speaker 1: he go in intentionally to help the Harris campaign? Did
Speaker 1: he go in intentionally to undermine Trump. I know nothing
Speaker 1: about him, nothing about his background. I would sure as
Speaker 1: heck like to know whose idea it was to put
Speaker 1: him in that rally. First, Why do you need a
Speaker 1: comic in that rally to begin with? I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is on a roll. Donald Trump has worked
Speaker 1: his tail off, Donald Trump has almost died twice for
Speaker 1: this cause he is on a roll. He is trending
Speaker 1: to victory. Why in the world would you insert any
Speaker 1: unnecessary risk into that event. Why would you insert any
Speaker 1: comic into that event? What is the concept there? And
Speaker 1: then above all, why would you insert this moron, this
Speaker 1: total moron into that event? You had so many great
Speaker 1: Americans speaking at that event and speaking on issues of
Speaker 1: great importance. Why would you bring this low life moron
Speaker 1: into that event to insult your voting blocks. He insulted Latinos,
Speaker 1: he insulted Jews, he insulted specifically Puerto Ricans, he insulted Blacks.
Speaker 1: That's political suicide.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying it's going to cost Trump the race,
Speaker 1: and I don't think it will. But when he has
Speaker 1: worked this hard, has Trump, and he's faced and overcome everything,
Speaker 1: He's had to overcome all this unfairness, and he's within
Speaker 1: a week of wrapping this thing up. Ryan, have you
Speaker 1: read or heard anything. I can't find anything anywhere. And
Speaker 1: I think we know why. Who would want to admit
Speaker 1: to it? As to who put him on the agenda,
Speaker 1: this Hingecliff guy on the agenda, I don't know who.
Speaker 3: But the process of booking talent for these things has
Speaker 3: to be accounted for.
Speaker 1: I mean, who we've signed off on it?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 1: I doubt anybody now will want to claim it. But
Speaker 1: how in the world did that happen? And one of
Speaker 1: the reasons we're in this great place where it's likely
Speaker 1: Trump will win is because and it's never going to
Speaker 1: be flawless, right, it's a human process, but because he's
Speaker 1: had such a great political he's had such a great
Speaker 1: political operation. So how could this happen? Who would even
Speaker 1: conceive of bringing in a comedian, but let alone an insult,
Speaker 1: Kay and Ryan, I've read a story earlier and it's
Speaker 1: I haven't seen it verified by any independent sources, but
Speaker 1: a story that that that the Trump campaign they'd asked
Speaker 1: everybody to submit their remarks in advance, they were going
Speaker 1: into the teleprompter, et cetera. And this story, don't know
Speaker 1: if it's true, was that this this more un Hinchcliff
Speaker 1: had had actually included a joke where he would refer
Speaker 1: to Kamala Harris as the C word, and that the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign pulled that out. Now the Trump campaign, according
Speaker 1: to the same story, is saying that these terrible insults,
Speaker 1: and I understand I'm going to get a million calls
Speaker 1: and text people saying, Dan, can't you take a joke?
Speaker 1: I'm the funniest guy around you just don't know it.
Speaker 1: I can take any kind of joke, but it is
Speaker 1: no joke to me. The outcome of this election, whether
Speaker 1: Donald Trump or Kamala Harris wins, is not a joke
Speaker 1: in matter. It's the future of this nation. It's a
Speaker 1: lot of innocent lives. So why I still can't even
Speaker 1: begin to comprehend why any comedian, any comedian, what message
Speaker 1: does that send to bring a comedian well, let alone
Speaker 1: this guy? But can you imagine Ryan? Now, by the way,
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign is saying that these insults and the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign wisely distanced themselves from it in a statement
Speaker 1: before Trump took the stage, but saying that these were
Speaker 1: not in the script. These insults were not in the script.
Speaker 1: He submitted that he snuck those in there. But why
Speaker 1: take this chance? Why give him a microphone?
Speaker 3: They could have gone with somebody that was the safer bet,
Speaker 3: like a Jimmy Fala, very funny guy who's on Fox News,
Speaker 3: is a friendly to us. I think there was an
Speaker 3: option if you wanted to go down that road. The
Speaker 3: other part that's intriguing to me about this dan is
Speaker 3: Joe Rogan came to Belco Theater here in Denver and
Speaker 3: I saw him last year and one of the opening
Speaker 3: comedians for him was Tony Hinchcliff and he is the
Speaker 3: co host of this Kill Tony podcast.
Speaker 5: He's at gy.
Speaker 3: You know, Donald Trump has gotten a lot of his
Speaker 3: cues from his son Baron on the online universe and podcast, etc.
Speaker 3: I don't know if Baron had anything to do with
Speaker 3: this one, but yeah, I'm with you. Hate to say
Speaker 3: you're fired to Baron, but you're playing. You think you're
Speaker 3: playing with maybe a modest lead right now, you feel good,
Speaker 3: You're right, there's no reason to throw this kind of
Speaker 3: wayward pass into the playbook.
Speaker 1: Why why take that kind of chance? I mean, if
Speaker 1: and there was so much good about yes, but if
Speaker 1: President Trump had simply, after the Rogan interview, said you
Speaker 1: know what, I'm taking the next week off. He wins,
Speaker 1: He wins. Now you still have to go out there, right.
Speaker 1: But but yeah, so listen, I believe he's still gonna win.
Speaker 1: I've said all along he was gonna win. I've said
Speaker 1: all along. I think his margin of victory is going
Speaker 1: to be much bigger than expected. And that's why this
Speaker 1: thing can only hurt him, right, it can only hurt
Speaker 1: and It's a question now of does it hurt him,
Speaker 1: and if it hurts him, how much? And if I'm
Speaker 1: wrong and this is a very very very close race,
Speaker 1: then yeah, this is the sort of thing that could
Speaker 1: be a real problem. But more than anything, I'm just furious.
Speaker 1: I'm furious at whoever decided to put this guy on
Speaker 1: the agenda. Obviously furious at this guy, and clearly can
Speaker 1: we discuss this as well. My constitutionally protected opinion is
Speaker 1: this guy was out to hurt Trump. He was out
Speaker 1: to undermine Trump. I want to get your taken that
Speaker 1: have an amazing guest coming up at four thirty six,
Speaker 1: Jenny Sue Jessen. You won't want to miss that, one
Speaker 1: of the most powerful arguments against Amendment seventy nine. You're
Speaker 1: on the Dankapla Show.
Speaker 5: And now back to the Dan Taplass Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Johnathan Pearl, no fan of Trump's, on ABC this morning. Look,
Speaker 1: I was there for about six hours yesterday.
Speaker 6: First thing I've got to say, Madison Square Garden was packed.
Speaker 6: People waited hours to get in.
Speaker 1: They sat through hour after hour of this rally.
Speaker 6: They were fervent in their devotion to all things Trump.
Speaker 6: Trump has created a movement there is no doubt. I
Speaker 6: cannot think of another Republican figure of my lifetime who
Speaker 6: could have come into a democratic city like New York
Speaker 6: and put together anything like that.
Speaker 1: We're a democratic figure who could have gone into a
Speaker 1: Republican city. And that's why I'm very confident Donald Trump
Speaker 1: will still win, and he'll win by a lot. And
Speaker 1: in a closer race, if this race was truly as
Speaker 1: close as the polls show, then yeah, that monumental stupidity
Speaker 1: of putting this moron Hinchcliff on the agenda yesterday could
Speaker 1: be the difference maker in a closer race. I just
Speaker 1: don't think this race is that close. We're going to
Speaker 1: find out in a week. But Trump has done so much,
Speaker 1: so well, And thank god you were telling me during
Speaker 1: the break crime that up to thirty five million views
Speaker 1: of Trump on Rogan and Trump did a great job
Speaker 1: and is going to benefit greatly from that and so
Speaker 1: much else. And Michelle Obama once again trying to undermine
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris, and we've talked about that before on this show,
Speaker 1: going back to her convention speech where she chose to
Speaker 1: racialize this race for the presidency, which is fundamentally un American.
Speaker 1: Fundamentally un American, and wanted to talk about, you know,
Speaker 1: the Oval office as one of those black jobs that
Speaker 1: Trump talks about, when any good American of any color,
Speaker 1: any stripe, would say, wait, a second presidency, that's totally
Speaker 1: color blind. We don't talk about that as a black officer,
Speaker 1: a white office, or a brown office. So those comments
Speaker 1: I think by Michelle at the convention were calculated to
Speaker 1: hurt Kamala Harris because across party lines, Americans are largely
Speaker 1: good people who want to be color blind. And so
Speaker 1: I think Michelle was out to damage Kamala there, and
Speaker 1: this one on Friday is certainly going to do it again.
Speaker 1: And she continues the attack on men, including black men,
Speaker 1: that her husband had launched as he tries to hurt
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris's chances.
Speaker 7: To the women listening, we have every right to demand
Speaker 7: that the men in our lives do better by us.
Speaker 1: We have to use.
Speaker 7: Our voices to make these choices clear to the men
Speaker 7: that we love. Our lives are worth more than their
Speaker 7: anger and disappointment, and we are more than just baby
Speaker 7: making vessels.
Speaker 1: So Barack Obama goes out and decides to attack men,
Speaker 1: say neither reason you're not voting for Harris is because
Speaker 1: she's a woman, which is nonsense. But he decides to
Speaker 1: attack black men in particular Michelle. Obama then extends that
Speaker 1: attack on men. Yeah, and who is it that Harris
Speaker 1: is really suffering with right now?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 3: Yeah? Man?
Speaker 1: So Michelle, how exactly is that supposed to help her? Yeah?
Speaker 1: It's not eight y five for zero five A two
Speaker 1: five five the number. Glad you're here. Boy. There's so
Speaker 1: much to talk about today, so much going well for
Speaker 1: Trump and then that enormous misstep. Someday I hope we
Speaker 1: find out. And it's I doubt very much President Trump
Speaker 1: approved having this idiot Hingecliff on the agenda yesterday. But
Speaker 1: someday I hope we find out who did uh this? Ryan?
Speaker 1: Is this story gonna help her her? Tim Walls, you
Speaker 1: may have talked about on your great show two to
Speaker 1: four each afternoon, Mountain Time on six point thirty kitschw
Speaker 1: and Denver Tim Walls New York Post story, Tim, you
Speaker 1: see this. Tim Walls accused of pushing the daughter of
Speaker 1: a communist party leader in China to the brink of
Speaker 1: suicide during his torrid sexual affair with her. In the eighties. Whoa, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: so this story now out on a bunch of different media,
Speaker 1: and do you think this helps her? Hurts Walls? I
Speaker 1: can't help him.
Speaker 3: But the other part that I saw was a little
Speaker 3: bit more benign was for some reason they thought it
Speaker 3: was a good idea for him to play Madden, the
Speaker 3: oh yeah football video game.
Speaker 1: AOC she called the pick six? Thank you, Dan.
Speaker 3: I mean, anybody with a cursory knowledge of football knows
Speaker 3: that you don't don't call that?
Speaker 5: What was that?
Speaker 3: And they deleted the post on X Yeah it made
Speaker 3: him seem like you didn't know anything about football.
Speaker 1: Here's this football coach.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, no knowledge of the game, it appears, But no,
Speaker 3: that story you just revealed is new to me.
Speaker 1: Yeah, for those who don't know football, up, pick six
Speaker 1: is when the defensive player intercepts a pass and runs
Speaker 1: it back for a touchdown. Nobody can call a pick six.
Speaker 1: I mean, you can stand there on defense all day
Speaker 1: and say, okay, guys, we're going to have a pick
Speaker 1: six here, But first the other team has to throw it,
Speaker 1: then you have to intercept it, then you have to
Speaker 1: run it back, and offense, you're never going to run
Speaker 1: a pick six you're not going to say in that
Speaker 1: all okay, guys, we want to throw a pick six here,
Speaker 1: unless you're whoever on the Trump team decided to have
Speaker 1: Hinchcliff right, that was because Hinchcliff. Yeah, that's where you're
Speaker 1: calling your own pick six, because I still have the
Speaker 1: constitutionally protected opinion no facts to support it. Hinchcliff had
Speaker 1: to know he was helping Kamala Harris when he went
Speaker 1: off on all those racial ethnic jokes. In the end, again,
Speaker 1: I think Trump has such a big lead, hard earned,
Speaker 1: that it's not going to matter. But thank god it's
Speaker 1: a race where he has a big lead eight FI
Speaker 1: five for zero five eight two five five texts DA
Speaker 1: and five seven seven three nine. And as we get
Speaker 1: more facts, I think this story originated in The Guardian,
Speaker 1: it's now in the New York Post, alleging that Tim
Speaker 1: Walls had an affair with the daughter of a Communist
Speaker 1: Party official in China in the eighties and that she
Speaker 1: is now speaking out saying a drover to the brink
Speaker 1: of suicide, et cetera. And Ryan believes that will hurt
Speaker 1: Waltz and hurt the Harris campaign and love to get
Speaker 1: your take on that. Also, we have a guest coming
Speaker 1: up at four what is it, four thirty five who
Speaker 1: I've never spoken to before, but I'm really looking forward
Speaker 1: to it. And this is a woman who wrote a
Speaker 1: very compelling piece for Colorado Politics, and it was a
Speaker 1: piece opposing Amendments seventy nine, which is this hideous, hideous
Speaker 1: Colorado initiative to enshrine in our constitution in fantaside and say, oh,
Speaker 1: by the way, you, as a taxpayer, have to pay
Speaker 1: for it. And this guest, Jenny Sue Jessen, who runs
Speaker 1: a group called Compass thirty one, which is an organization
Speaker 1: that fights human trafficking, wrote a piece that talked about
Speaker 1: how Amendments seventy nine will help human traffickers, and it's
Speaker 1: such a compelling piece and one of so many powerful
Speaker 1: reasons to vote against Amendments seventy nine. But she will
Speaker 1: be with us after the break and she's going to
Speaker 1: talk about how she was sold for sex as a
Speaker 1: child as well. You're on the Dan Capliss Show.
Speaker 5: You're listening to the Dan Kapliss Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Let me go to the VIP line. Welcome to somebody
Speaker 1: the show. I've looked very much forward to speaking with
Speaker 1: Jenny Sue Jesson is her name, and she had a
Speaker 1: very compelling piece in Colorado politics. Amendment seventy nine protects
Speaker 1: Colorado traffickers, not women, and the first paragraph of the
Speaker 1: piece begins starting at the age of four, I was
Speaker 1: sold by my grandfather to other men for sex. And
Speaker 1: so I'll let Jenny Sue pick the story up from there.
Speaker 1: Jenny Sue, welcome to the dan kapla show y Dan.
Speaker 2: Thanks so much for having me today.
Speaker 1: Well, thank you, Oh my goodness, it is and my understanding,
Speaker 1: Jenny Sue, as you're with Compass thirty one, which fights
Speaker 1: human trafficking.
Speaker 2: Is that correct, Yes, sir, we want an international president.
Speaker 1: Hey, Jenny Sue, we are having a problem with the connection.
Speaker 1: I don't know if it's on our end or yours.
Speaker 1: Can you hear it?
Speaker 2: You just fine, I think it just got better.
Speaker 1: Thank you for that. Okay, Well, we'll get Jenny Sue back.
Speaker 1: What she has to say is so important. We just
Speaker 1: want to make sure we have the best possible connection
Speaker 1: for you. It was just such a compelling piece in
Speaker 1: Colorado politics. If you're not familiar with Amendments seventy nine,
Speaker 1: it's one of the most hideous constitutional amendments. Imaginable. It
Speaker 1: would put in the Colorado Constitution the so called right
Speaker 1: to take a healthy baby, healthy mother nine months seconds
Speaker 1: before birth and kill that child. And oh, by the way,
Speaker 1: taxpayers have to pay for it. It's just stunningly, stunningly insidious.
Speaker 1: Let's go back to the VIP line. Jenny Sue, thank you. Yeah, that,
Speaker 1: Oh my goodness, it was all worth it. It was
Speaker 1: all worth it. That is such a great connection. So,
Speaker 1: as you heard, I started the introduction of you with
Speaker 1: the first sentence and the first paragraph of the piece.
Speaker 1: Could you pick it up from there and explain, after
Speaker 1: this unimaginably horrific experience of being sold for sex yourself,
Speaker 1: how your journey has led you now to come out
Speaker 1: publicly against Amendment seventy nine.
Speaker 2: Yes, absolutely so. I did spend seventeen, well fourteen years
Speaker 2: of my young life being trafficked by my grandfather here
Speaker 2: in the US, and my first pregnancy occurred at the
Speaker 2: age of fifteen, and in an effort to cover up
Speaker 2: his crime, which actually was successful, he led me to
Speaker 2: a forced abortion, and because of that, the concealment of
Speaker 2: the crime against me, he was able to continue to
Speaker 2: profit from my rape for another two years. And so
Speaker 2: I do have a dog in this fight. I am
Speaker 2: passionate about women's bodies and their autonomy and certainly about
Speaker 2: protecting life. And so that's why Amendment seventy nine is
Speaker 2: so important to discuss.
Speaker 1: How does seventy nine protect and aid human traffickers in Colorado.
Speaker 2: So the amendment is an effort to codify into our
Speaker 2: Colorado constitution that there will be nothing that impedes a
Speaker 2: woman's access to abortion. And in an effort to eliminate
Speaker 2: anything that would impede access, one of the things that
Speaker 2: goes away is parental notification, and so we will have
Speaker 2: we do have. We already have minors, young women cut
Speaker 2: into clinics seeking an abortion that are, you know, twelve, thirteen, fourteen,
Speaker 2: fifteen years old, but without parental consent, parental notification, the
Speaker 2: parents don't know that the girl was pregnant and how
Speaker 2: she came to be pregnant, whether it was of her
Speaker 2: own choice consensually, or whether she was being exploited or
Speaker 2: abused by a trafficker. The amendment also limits or eliminate
Speaker 2: all clinical regulations on the clinics that are doing second
Speaker 2: third term abortions. There's no licensing, no regulation, no inspections
Speaker 2: of these clinics anymore, because again that would impede access,
Speaker 2: and both of those factors then protect traffickers and pedophiles,
Speaker 2: those that might conceive a child in violence, bring the
Speaker 2: young woman into a clinic, force her to have an abortion,
Speaker 2: and no one there's no longer any mandatory reporting for
Speaker 2: this child who's pregnant, and no parental notification, So both
Speaker 2: of those protect the traffickers, not the young woman who
Speaker 2: has conceived a child.
Speaker 1: This is such an important point that you're making and
Speaker 1: quoting from your piece, Jenny Sue writes, in my years
Speaker 1: of working as a direct service provider for sexually exploited miners,
Speaker 1: I have seen tragic patterns of violence which I experienced myself.
Speaker 1: Young girls trafficked repeatedly, raped for profit, frequently finding themselves pregnant,
Speaker 1: and forced to have abortions to conceal the crime. And
Speaker 1: your point that, Okay, at that moment now where these
Speaker 1: monsters who have done this with a girl now have
Speaker 1: to take her to an abortion provider, seventy nine gives
Speaker 1: these monsters complete cover.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, it does. There's no longer any evidence of the
Speaker 2: crime any DNA as you raised, the pregnancy goes away,
Speaker 2: and the woman or young girl, then, I would argue,
Speaker 2: experiences a next level or even more profound level of
Speaker 2: violence when this life is ripped from her womb. And
Speaker 2: in over ten years of experience, I've only encountered two
Speaker 2: young women that didn't report at least one forced abortion
Speaker 2: as part of their trafficking experience. It's a very common
Speaker 2: thing among young women who aren't exploited in sects for profit.
Speaker 1: Well, I am so grateful to you for everything you do,
Speaker 1: for your peace, for bringing this point forward, because it's
Speaker 1: the kind of point, Jenny Sue, that I think can
Speaker 1: cut through the noise because so many people get entrenched
Speaker 1: on both sides of this issue and stop and think, oh,
Speaker 1: my lord, she's right that this will help human traffickers,
Speaker 1: and with so much emphasis on it now right, because
Speaker 1: it seems like a lot of places you go, maybe
Speaker 1: into a bathroom at a hospital, sometimes on a plane whatever,
Speaker 1: you'll see notices to keep an eye out for what
Speaker 1: it may appear to be human trafficking. And this would
Speaker 1: have to be one of the best opportunities out there
Speaker 1: to save these girls.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, this is a critical point of intervention. If you
Speaker 2: have a young woman under the age of eighteen who's
Speaker 2: coming in for an abortion, the clinic providers at the
Speaker 2: very least need to ask questions to understand how this
Speaker 2: minor became pregnant, whether it was consensually or against her will,
Speaker 2: And in the cases that it is not consensual, that
Speaker 2: they would be mandatory reporters, that there would be an
Speaker 2: investigation as to who perpetrated this crime, and rather than
Speaker 2: erasing the evidence, it would be held and documented and
Speaker 2: part of a case against the perpetrators of violence.
Speaker 1: Jenny Suggessen our guests with Compass thirty one, which works
Speaker 1: against human trafficking and to support victims. Now, Jenny Sue,
Speaker 1: it seems to me listening to you brilliantly address this,
Speaker 1: what Colorado law should require is all abortion providers to
Speaker 1: have one of those signs up in the clinic that says,
Speaker 1: inform the provider if you're being trafficked or you know.
Speaker 1: I've seen in some places where it says, make a
Speaker 1: certain kind of sign with your hands if you're being trafficked,
Speaker 1: And why shouldn't the law require that to be posted
Speaker 1: on the walls of these clinics where these girls who
Speaker 1: are victims of human traffickers can see that sign and
Speaker 1: hopefully get help.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, but even beyond that, we know that it's common
Speaker 2: practice in emergency rooms now that the clinic provider will
Speaker 2: initially do an intake interview with clients patients coming in
Speaker 2: and ask some critical questions do you feel safe at home?
Speaker 2: Are you being hurt? Do you have any thoughts of
Speaker 2: self harm? They ask these questions on purpose so that
Speaker 2: they can strategically intervene into situations of danger. However, that
Speaker 2: is not part of the practice in abortion clinics because
Speaker 2: the abortion clinics are holding as the highest value a
Speaker 2: woman's right to choose, and people can argue either side
Speaker 2: of a woman's right to choose. But if a minor
Speaker 2: child is brought in by an adult and is interviewed,
Speaker 2: or the procedure is carried out with the person that
Speaker 2: brings her in, she does not have the opportunity to
Speaker 2: report even if she wanted to.
Speaker 1: Well, I hope that everybody reads your piece. It's in
Speaker 1: Colorado politics. I posted it on ax at Dane caplist.
Speaker 1: How can people follow you through social.
Speaker 2: They can find me online Compass thirty one dot org.
Speaker 2: They can contact me through there. I'm certainly on social
Speaker 2: media at Jenny to Justin. They can find me any
Speaker 2: of those places and I would be happy to continue
Speaker 2: this conversation.
Speaker 1: Well, thank you for all that you're doing, and thank
Speaker 1: you for this time today, and I hope we talk
Speaker 1: again soon. Thanks so much, Dan, Thank you, take care. Wow. Wow,
Speaker 1: very powerful. I sure hope at Dan Caplis on X
Speaker 1: just please send this to everybody you know and have
Speaker 1: them send it to everybody they know. I have to
Speaker 1: believe there are a lot of people who are committed
Speaker 1: to abortion being legal, and I would disagree with them
Speaker 1: on that. Who would vote against seventy nine based on this?
Speaker 1: You're on the Dan Caplas Show.
Speaker 5: And now back to the Dan Caplis Show podcast.
Speaker 1: They speaking of Hollywood. I told you the left would
Speaker 1: totally lose their minds down the stretch when it appeared
Speaker 1: that Trump was going to win. And we're in that
Speaker 1: moment right now. Here's exhibit triple A. Whoopee Goldberg all.
Speaker 4: Walking about you and he's not going to be He's
Speaker 4: not gonna, you.
Speaker 1: Know, say, oh where the white guy.
Speaker 7: I'm going to keep you from being deported.
Speaker 6: No, he's gonna to.
Speaker 1: Port you and put the white guy with someone else.
Speaker 1: The man is out there. This is going to be
Speaker 1: one of the greatest stretches of your life. If if
Speaker 1: like me, you want two things. You want to see
Speaker 1: Trump win. You want to see the left get fully
Speaker 1: exposed for how Looney and Waco and far left secular.
Speaker 1: This is just another example. So what be Goldberg? Now'll say, hey, no,
Speaker 1: Trump wins. Hey, he's going to deport the woman of color,
Speaker 1: and then he's going to match the husband who stays
Speaker 1: in America with another woman somewhere else. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: just looney Tunes stuff, right, And the more of that
Speaker 1: that's out there, the more it helps Trump. So yeah,
Speaker 1: eight five five for zero five eight two five five
Speaker 1: the number and there's a lot more where that came from,
Speaker 1: and we'll be enjoying that together. I want to get
Speaker 1: to texters as well. Jenny su Jessen who just joined
Speaker 1: us talking about how another reason you should vote against
Speaker 1: seventy nine is it helps human traffickers. Very compelling reader piece.
Speaker 1: Go to at Dan Kaplis on Twitter. Send it to
Speaker 1: everybody you know I do want to come back to
Speaker 1: because you know me, I'm the guy who's been telling
Speaker 1: you long before Biden was deposed that he would be deposed,
Speaker 1: that the campaign would get tougher for Trump, but the
Speaker 1: Trump would still win in the end. And when Kamala
Speaker 1: was soaring in the polls, I said, don't worry about it.
Speaker 1: What goes up must come down. There's no there there
Speaker 1: And once she starts to fall, she won't stop. There'll
Speaker 1: be nothing to break her fall. And then all of
Speaker 1: that's come true, right, and then somehow yesterday, And I
Speaker 1: want to know who did in the Trump campaign because
Speaker 1: I want to know if they're a double agent. I
Speaker 1: want to know if they were trying to hurt Trump,
Speaker 1: because clearly, this moron Tony Hinchcliffe, who claims to be
Speaker 1: a comedian, he was, in my opinion, clearly trying to
Speaker 1: hurt Trump, clearly trying to hurt Trump. And he has
Speaker 1: hurt Trump with his jokes about different races and everything else.
Speaker 1: Now will that change the outcome of this race. I
Speaker 1: don't believe so, because I think Trump has a very
Speaker 1: significant lead. Will it hurt Trump? I think it's highly
Speaker 1: likely to backfire on the left now that they seem
Speaker 1: to be focusing on this. You know, these horrible statements
Speaker 1: by a comedian at a rally. Donald Trump himself didn't
Speaker 1: say it. Yeah, that might backfire on the left, but
Speaker 1: when you are you've worked this hard and you're cruising
Speaker 1: for victory, and you can taste it, you can reach
Speaker 1: out and touch it. It is the third biggest political
Speaker 1: mistake in modern American history. The first was installing Kamala,
Speaker 1: the second was choosing Wolsover Shapiro. And this is the third.
Speaker 1: And unfortunately this one got made by the good guys
Speaker 1: and gales. And again they'll be able to overcome it
Speaker 1: because they have a big enough lead. But just moronic,
Speaker 1: moronic to put that guy up there. He was clearly
Speaker 1: there to hurt Donald Trump. Let's go to self identified
Speaker 1: great America. Oh no, this is great American Eric in Denver,
Speaker 1: No self identified. He is a great American. Eric. Welcome
Speaker 1: back to the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 4: Hey, Dan, you're great American. You know Alexa. He has
Speaker 4: a beautiful she does.
Speaker 1: She does absolute yes, and she texts well too. She
Speaker 1: text our show often and we love those.
Speaker 4: Hey, young man, that Henchman Henscliff guy. Dude, you know
Speaker 4: it's like he was a plan.
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 4: I had I think so I'm going to say this
Speaker 4: is what I proved it if I was President Trump. Yeah,
Speaker 4: I had no idea what he was going to say.
Speaker 4: That came out of his mouth, not mine.
Speaker 1: And in the story, you know, yeah, no, I think
Speaker 1: And you see different stories. Now you have no way
Speaker 1: to confirm them, but you see different stories that he
Speaker 1: had planned to tell a quote joke that referred to
Speaker 1: Kamala as the C word, and the Trump team saw
Speaker 1: that in a script and pulled it. Trump team says,
Speaker 1: and I believe them that that none of this other
Speaker 1: garbage was in his script that he had libbed. That
Speaker 1: I think he was there to hurt Trump.
Speaker 4: And I agree h with you. I mean, Trump is
Speaker 4: just too sophisticated to have a clown like that, you know,
Speaker 4: be in his sphere so to speak, you.
Speaker 1: Know, yeah, And you know he has worked so hard
Speaker 1: and done so well among people of color, Latinos, blacks included.
Speaker 4: I just outraged it Trump black that I love.
Speaker 1: That, And I'm just so outraged at whoever put this.
Speaker 1: More on Hinchcliff on the agenda, Trump has sacrificed too
Speaker 1: much and he's worked too hard to get to this,
Speaker 1: and the country is at steak, right, Eric, that's that's
Speaker 1: not rhetoric. The country is at steak. You know.
Speaker 4: Can I ask you a silly question? I know you
Speaker 4: do you know Jay and Jordan's uh.
Speaker 1: Suckulow the lawyer is personally I know, I know who
Speaker 1: he is, I don't know him personally. Okay, what do
Speaker 1: you think? And we need to get him on.
Speaker 4: Well, yeah, he's a great American as you.
Speaker 1: But he had the same.
Speaker 4: Frustration on his radio show, Oh captain, yeah, yeah, man,
Speaker 4: he was kicked off.
Speaker 1: Well, I think Eric, the music means I've got a
Speaker 1: bill now, thank you for your call. And Trump's can
Speaker 1: overcome it because he has a big lead. But absolutely
Speaker 1: moronic of this guy who think was out to hert
Speaker 1: Trump