Speaker 1: H what.
Speaker 2: Mum hm mm hmmmmm. Okay, it says I'm live, but
Speaker 2: I didn't say it. They're really it usually does, so
Speaker 2: that was interesting. I went to start today just now
Speaker 2: and it said that I had trouble getting onto Twitter
Speaker 2: because I don't use that other word or that other letter,
Speaker 2: and I was blocked. My account was locked. So it said,
Speaker 2: what you can do? He said, we find that your
Speaker 2: content has violated X rules, like you guys promote all
Speaker 2: kinds of horrible stuff on here. What did I do?
Speaker 2: And then I said something about Elon Musk being drawn
Speaker 2: and quartered apparently, and how I would pay the eight
Speaker 2: dollars a month to see that, and apparently that was
Speaker 2: too much, so I had to I guess, I guess
Speaker 2: AI after like a week, finally figured out what drawn
Speaker 2: and quartered means by all the metadata we feed it
Speaker 2: and realized that, hey, that's a bad thing, and then
Speaker 2: I decided to lock the account. So there, I just
Speaker 2: said it on I think I'm live on Twitter. So
Speaker 2: there you go, and let's see. Let's see if I
Speaker 2: refresh this if we're on rumble, I gotta check this.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, we are good, good good good. Now let's
Speaker 2: check FTJ Media. Let's see what happens here. Oh and
Speaker 2: my email account for josh you dot net is a
Speaker 2: toasty it's done, so yeah, good, we're on everywhere. Hey, everybody,
Speaker 2: everybody out there. Sorry about the delay. Dealing with some
Speaker 2: computer stuff and then some other things kind of got
Speaker 2: while I was waiting for things to reboot and stuff
Speaker 2: like that, I had gotten into some other things that
Speaker 2: I needed to do, So forgive the delay. But being
Speaker 2: that it's ten seven am here, I'm Mountain standard, so
Speaker 2: I don't move. Everybody else does when it comes to
Speaker 2: the time zones, right. Unfortunately, that means that starting when
Speaker 2: I get back to getting on time people in the
Speaker 2: Pacific time, the new starting time for you because you changed,
Speaker 2: is going to be seven am because it's still eight
Speaker 2: am here. And likewise, if you are Central time, it's
Speaker 2: going to be ten am right instead, no nine am, sorry,
Speaker 2: nine am, and then Eastern will be ten am. I'm
Speaker 2: just gonna say hello to everybody over here, all two
Speaker 2: or three of you, including.
Speaker 3: Myself over at the FTJ.
Speaker 2: Hello, FTJ. That's pretty dry at ten eleven eleven, that's
Speaker 2: pretty funny. I'm not sure what everybody's plans are today,
Speaker 2: but mine are not going to go do that ritualistic
Speaker 2: action that people do. Sorry, you can say I'm part
Speaker 2: of the problem if you'd like, But I did that
Speaker 2: twice the last two times and for the same person,
Speaker 2: and that person is running again if you catch my drift.
Speaker 2: And I'm not going to do either. And people say, well,
Speaker 2: let's do the local ones. But then they also fill in,
Speaker 2: don't think that you don't. If you leave something out,
Speaker 2: they're gonna complete it for you. They're gonna pick for you.
Speaker 2: So and I can't put myself on the record of
Speaker 2: having that with God or whomever that I endorse what
Speaker 2: the hell is about to happen to us? So, and
Speaker 2: just so everybody is aware, I did make these cool
Speaker 2: little things here. So let's show you real quick, morning,
Speaker 2: President of Conformed Tucson.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we're not.
Speaker 2: We're kind of neighbors, Blake, I'm in Luma. Let's see.
Speaker 2: Let me show you real quick here. I guess I
Speaker 2: could just pull up the regular tab. That's gonna do that,
Speaker 2: all right. So on FTJ media, we have this thing
Speaker 2: and I set it up the other day, so let
Speaker 2: me see if I can collapse this so you can
Speaker 2: see what it looks like at first, there's my frozen face.
Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, eyes closed because I'm still tired. But even
Speaker 2: people close their eyes all the time they call or
Speaker 2: they blink, but I just happen to catch it like that.
Speaker 2: So anyway, you can see the description here, it's the
Speaker 2: same as everybody else's. Try blue for some reason does
Speaker 2: not come over as a link. I don't understand why
Speaker 2: that it's a thing. But you can just highlight it
Speaker 2: from here to there right right click and copy and
Speaker 2: then paste it into your URL and then you'll get
Speaker 2: a little button. Yet you click for seventeen percent off
Speaker 2: the tinctures over there, okay, and the gifts and go,
Speaker 2: which is so desperately needy. I like, when I'm not
Speaker 2: making hot sauce, this is what I do. So read, research, exercise,
Speaker 2: make hot sauce. Us be a dad, so all helps, okay,
Speaker 2: And then go to money Tree Publishing. Right here you
Speaker 2: see this blue link like like, luckily that one still works.
Speaker 2: You can just click it and code be a l
Speaker 2: and I don't know if it's to be caps or not.
Speaker 2: That's the way they sent it over to me, so
Speaker 2: that's the way I re typed it. For ten percent
Speaker 2: off your entire order. Lots of people have been using it.
Speaker 2: Lots of people have been getting taking my advice and
Speaker 2: getting helstorm the book.
Speaker 3: Now, I hope it.
Speaker 2: You don't do what I used to do and just
Speaker 2: put it on a shelf and collect the books. And
Speaker 2: I did that for many years before I started actually
Speaker 2: reading what was in them. And there was a time
Speaker 2: when my attention span was not the greatest when it
Speaker 2: came to that, Like I would read a Stephen King
Speaker 2: book for the Dark Tower series and I read, you know,
Speaker 2: But now I'd read every day and I read a
Speaker 2: lot so and I it's on the elliptical at the
Speaker 2: same time, so I'm doing an activity. So I feel
Speaker 2: like every team more and it actually keeps me going,
Speaker 2: keeps my mind off of the exercise stress and wanting
Speaker 2: your brain to keep on telling you, okay, that's enough,
Speaker 2: get off.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 2: I just you read and you're engaged in something else,
Speaker 2: and you do better. You do better that way, and.
Speaker 3: Then simper frillc dot com.
Speaker 2: You can click that one and that goes to my
Speaker 2: site that has all these other links, like the doctor
Speaker 2: Peter Glidden one that you see up here for leaf.
Speaker 2: That one's in there. You just click his picture and
Speaker 2: then you use quid Ballbusters for fifty percent off right there,
Speaker 2: okay for his membership, which you should most certainly have.
Speaker 2: And then there's eleven percent off my site hot Sauce
Speaker 2: using Victory. Now I don't share that out of site.
Speaker 2: There's one that's called fan Favorite that's on the site
Speaker 2: for everyone else, but for the videos that is for you. Now,
Speaker 2: what I was going to show you on the chat
Speaker 2: thing is when you click that open this one works
Speaker 2: on its live right, there's this one. I'll pay it
Speaker 2: they call it, but when you click it, it brings
Speaker 2: you right to It's not going to show you because
Speaker 2: we're navigating away from this thing, but it's my gifts
Speaker 2: and go all right, and when you click this one.
Speaker 2: So I made some donation categories as many as I could,
Speaker 2: so observer three. So if you plage three, it's reserver
Speaker 2: status and you can get like a little you get
Speaker 2: a little icon when you when you make a comment,
Speaker 2: and you can also leave a comment like a super
Speaker 2: chat right or like a rumble rant aware a friendly
Speaker 2: for seven two quick for Haitians, and it's a it's
Speaker 2: a picture of a duck. It's a it's an I
Speaker 2: kind of a duck and emoji of a duck. So
Speaker 2: two quick. For Haitians, it's a mallard and that's for
Speaker 2: ten tells their cat about the vase. That one's fifteen
Speaker 2: and although it's kind of like it's seeing a scroll over. Yeah,
Speaker 2: there you go, and the cat itself and it's like
Speaker 2: like that, And that's twenty and filler contributor and producer
Speaker 2: status twenty five and forty. All right, so you can
Speaker 2: learn you year from three to forty, or you can
Speaker 2: type in your own I think two pretty sure you
Speaker 2: can't right there. You just type in right in. So
Speaker 2: if you have a different option, different choice, you can
Speaker 2: just put it in right there if you want to
Speaker 2: help out this show. And then it goes two great
Speaker 2: things like making this show better and making sure I
Speaker 2: can still do What is that?
Speaker 3: What's that?
Speaker 2: Crap? What the heck? Why is my screen all retarded? Now?
Speaker 2: Why am I? Also? What what are you doing?
Speaker 1: Dude?
Speaker 2: Why? Why would you even do that? That thing looks awful?
Speaker 2: This layout it's terrible. Why would they do that? They
Speaker 2: just changed things all of a sudden. Hey, look you
Speaker 2: look retarded now? Oh great, thanks, good times. Wow, all right, Well,
Speaker 2: I I officially hate stream Yard too. Now, I MA,
Speaker 2: I've said that a lot of times, but I mean,
Speaker 2: I have another reason.
Speaker 3: So today we're gonna look over Ted Pike.
Speaker 2: I don't know why I paused there going on with
Speaker 2: William Shatnon are on? You dramatic pauses for no reason?
Speaker 2: I think, I think, what do you call it? The
Speaker 2: other guy has that issue too, the man. You know,
Speaker 2: I'm talking about Christopher walking.
Speaker 3: The grocery list.
Speaker 2: I used to do a grocery list like eggs, milk,
Speaker 2: like I always changed, like every every way he knows
Speaker 2: every every word is a little bit different. Okay, So
Speaker 2: we're gonna start with hate loss making criminals out of Christians.
Speaker 2: That the second part is not as important to me.
Speaker 2: It's making criminals everybody. Now, this is from Canada, and
Speaker 2: this is freaking twenty years ago, right, so twenty four
Speaker 2: years ago or so. I don't remember when exactly this
Speaker 2: came out originally. Let me tell you if it tells us,
Speaker 2: I don't think it does. It might, yeah, but anyway,
Speaker 2: it's S six two six, the Local Law Enforcement Enhancement
Speaker 2: Act is still pending before No, it's not.
Speaker 3: But I want to know what hate does.
Speaker 2: It doubles your fines, it doubles your time, it doubles
Speaker 2: your pleasure, and doubles your fun. So that's what that's
Speaker 2: all about. Making things more severe by labeling something. If
Speaker 2: you harm somebody, isn't that considered? Did you do it
Speaker 2: because you like them? So what's the other in? What's
Speaker 2: the other emphasis for?
Speaker 1: Oh?
Speaker 2: And by the way, just so you know, the United
Speaker 2: Nations labels what they call what they call hate speech
Speaker 2: because if you say something that hurts another person's feelings,
Speaker 2: that is labeled genocide. Did you know that? Because it's
Speaker 2: a precursor to genocide because you could not only hurt
Speaker 2: their feelings, but you could incite other people to be
Speaker 2: angry with them too. And if that's the case, then
Speaker 2: you are guilty of genocide. You can technically, I haven't
Speaker 2: done it yet that I'm aware of. They could technically
Speaker 2: rip you out of your entire country, bring you somewhere
Speaker 2: to have a mock trial, you know, like Nuremberg, Like
Speaker 2: that mock trial bullshit, and that the one that everybody
Speaker 2: chants for because they don't understand what the hell they're
Speaker 2: talking about, and uh, persecute you towards tore you, torture
Speaker 2: you into confession, they kill you if they feel like it,
Speaker 2: you know, because genocide isn't a good thing. But it's
Speaker 2: not genocide to speak the truth. So if you say
Speaker 2: something and it hurts someone's feelings, oh, Gody G or
Speaker 2: Gandhi g or Kenny g whatever. Wait a, so that's
Speaker 2: that's tied into this. That's the reason why I bring
Speaker 2: it up because that's a bad thing. That's a that's
Speaker 2: something that just wait, just wait if you think it's like, oh,
Speaker 2: that's like weird rule, that doesn't The United Nations is
Speaker 2: our bit.
Speaker 3: We're there, We're their bitch, is what I'm trying to say.
Speaker 2: Uh I ms, you know he backslash United Nations, backslash
Speaker 2: CFR backslash wait Vey Bankers backslash Roman Catholic Empire still unfunctioning. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 2: So let's go to this one, and there's gonna be
Speaker 2: some things I'm gonna skip over because when they go
Speaker 2: into their pastor rants about stuff that I don't think
Speaker 2: is helpful because it alienates people who it's like, well,
Speaker 2: do there in your book of Dacada?
Speaker 3: Like, who do you think wrote those books?
Speaker 4: Dude?
Speaker 2: Stop? It can you do anything without referencing that as
Speaker 2: you're well, this is well, how about you just use
Speaker 2: reality to show that that's not good rather than.
Speaker 3: The book and blah blah blah, and you did.
Speaker 2: I'm out of it, right chrescreen Tadpike. This is from
Speaker 2: a channel called Bang This world works. I don't agree
Speaker 2: it could. It could work, but it doesn't right now
Speaker 2: because we've given up on it. We've pussied out of
Speaker 2: a lot of fights. So I don't know if I
Speaker 2: say it works, but you know, you can do your thing?
Speaker 2: What is that? That's not what I did? All Right?
Speaker 2: There we go. It might be a little slow in
Speaker 2: the startup. I kind of skipped it a little bit ahead,
Speaker 2: but like I said, I'm probably gonna jump around that
Speaker 2: because we have three different videos to get through. So
Speaker 2: I want to get to the points that I thought
Speaker 2: were like major impactful, right And this is going to
Speaker 2: probably hopefully conclude our Tedpike a little mini series here,
Speaker 2: our two parter, because I want to get back into
Speaker 2: I want to get back into the final part of
Speaker 2: the Take Your Medicine series, which is going to be
Speaker 2: showing that rabies does not exist, showing you that everything
Speaker 2: that they've ever claimed about vaccines or about viruses, does
Speaker 2: not is not reality, And it's poison that they're convincing
Speaker 2: you to take. And I'm going to prove that this
Speaker 2: is an eugenics, euthanization, and murder system called allopathy. All right,
Speaker 2: The vaccines and the anti virals, the antibiotics, and the
Speaker 2: prescription medications are not good. Not good. Anytime you inject
Speaker 2: anything into you, it is completely unnatural. So do not
Speaker 2: do that. And if it comes down to a fight
Speaker 2: for life, if it comes down to taking your children
Speaker 2: out of school because you can't trust that school not
Speaker 2: to do something against your wishes, then do that because
Speaker 2: your children are more important than anything else. Right, And
Speaker 2: if you have to take that fight, even though you
Speaker 2: weren't planning it that day, you've got to do it.
Speaker 2: You know, someone comes to your house to take them
Speaker 2: because you wouldn't do that, then you've got to take
Speaker 2: them out.
Speaker 3: This the way it is, it's just the way it is.
Speaker 2: You don't, you don't can, You don't cave in that
Speaker 2: this situation. It doesn't matter whether other people perceive you, guys.
Speaker 2: Other people are retards, so don't worry about what they
Speaker 2: think about you. They're not the ones protecting their children.
Speaker 2: So that's that's the type of piece of shit they
Speaker 2: you're worried about how they think about you. Don't worry
Speaker 2: about them. Okay, it's a little personal. All right, let's go.
Speaker 2: It doesn't have sound right now, don't worry.
Speaker 4: It'll come on.
Speaker 3: Hopefully, But now has to do.
Speaker 2: New Bill number S nine sixty six includes with S sixteen,
Speaker 2: the Equal Rights of Equality, Rights and Equality Dignity for
Speaker 2: All Americans Act. Oh, this is the American one, not
Speaker 2: the Canadian but they're gonna talk about the Canadian first.
Speaker 2: I should have known when it said yeah, asked yeah. Okay, well,
Speaker 2: let's see if we can move up to this a
Speaker 2: little bit. It's kind of hard to do this Part
Speaker 2: one anti hate legislation in the US. They tell you
Speaker 2: about the upcoming intermission. That's kind of funny, all right,
Speaker 2: And then they're gonna they're gonna start off with a
Speaker 2: little bit of bs about Germany because they don't get it,
Speaker 2: so just deal with it, all right, very wise people,
Speaker 2: and every other way. Still by the narrative that the
Speaker 2: the victorious wayvas of the world, and you know the bankers. Uh, still,
Speaker 2: what do you say I don't know, push. I guess
Speaker 2: it's a stupid way to say it. But through the
Speaker 2: education and the many books and documentaries and all this
Speaker 2: other bullshit, right, they hammer you with the media about, oh,
Speaker 2: the Germans are bad people. Oh yeah, no, so we
Speaker 2: all understand that. So yeah, I don't need to explain
Speaker 2: that throughout the show. But when people regress to that,
Speaker 2: and then they don't talk about the Bolsheviks who actually
Speaker 2: were waves themselves and killed many millions of people and
Speaker 2: then projected their sins upon the German So we're not
Speaker 2: doing that at least. See how if as long as
Speaker 2: you understand that, you can check out or roll your
Speaker 2: eyes at certain times, I'm hitting play. So obviously there's
Speaker 2: a lot of prepagainda hear. A lot of these organizations
Speaker 2: here started with good intent, but everything gets co opted
Speaker 2: and turned evil. So then they could point out and
Speaker 2: say see that, and that way, they just they stop
Speaker 2: it from being a real honest movement again because they
Speaker 2: get the rest of the world to think, or the
Speaker 2: rest of the country to think that certain actions and
Speaker 2: behavior are indicative of something wrong, evil or you know,
Speaker 2: and then you're the enemy because they put their own
Speaker 2: assholes into it or co opt it and make it
Speaker 2: into something that it wasn't. Yeah, that's the greatest name.
Speaker 4: Hello, I'm Ted Pike and this is my wife Elynn.
Speaker 4: In nineteen eighty eight, an evangelical pastor in Sweden opened
Speaker 4: his Bible to the story of Sodom and Gomorrah. He
Speaker 4: informed his congregation, which included a homosexual, that God is
Speaker 4: still angry at sexual perversion and will judge those who
Speaker 4: practice it. Several months later, this pastor was serving a
Speaker 4: sentence in jail.
Speaker 2: I have to pause here just to say I don't
Speaker 2: agree that is a thing at all, because have you
Speaker 2: seen so who wrote that?
Speaker 3: What I mean, Sadam to go more?
Speaker 2: Story?
Speaker 3: Where's that come from? Comes from the Torah, the Tanakh?
Speaker 2: Right? Where is the talmut commentary on that very jacked up,
Speaker 2: made up book that they made in the Hellenistic period? Right?
Speaker 2: So why does it tell me the love side of me?
Speaker 2: Not not among men but men and boys? Absolutely? Hmm.
Speaker 3: Their guide is not upset about it.
Speaker 2: Jehovah has little spell incantations, yes, magic that you can
Speaker 2: you know, can pre you know, go through the whole
Speaker 2: ritual to get blessings upon your gay relations with another
Speaker 2: gay male and I'm another adult male, so that even
Speaker 2: contradicts it interesting in the name of Yahu sabioth and
Speaker 2: slash Jehovah slash Yahweh slash Saturn.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think I've showed that to you.
Speaker 2: I know, Amin has He's shown you the little uh religious,
Speaker 2: uh not religious ritual shindig that you do in order
Speaker 2: to get Jehovah to help you with magic spells to
Speaker 2: to entice a male a male and male relationship.
Speaker 4: He had violated Sweden's anti hate Statute, a law that
Speaker 4: protects groups such as homosexuals from verbal violence. Verbal violence
Speaker 4: includes public statements which might cause them embarrassment because of
Speaker 4: their sexual orientation.
Speaker 1: It is well known that socialist Sweden is the trend
Speaker 1: setter in human engineering. What happens there will probably be
Speaker 1: taken for granted through much of the world ten or
Speaker 1: fifteen years later. But laws in America banning criticism of others,
Speaker 1: it can't happen. Most will reply, not with free speech
Speaker 1: guaranteed by the Constitution, but it can. A hidden agenda
Speaker 1: toward ultimately restricting free speech surfaced among bills introduced in
Speaker 1: Congress in the summer of two thousand. Hate crimes legislation
Speaker 1: was proposed as a first step toward banishing prejudice in America.
Speaker 1: This bill, deceptively titled the Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act
Speaker 1: of two thousand, passed the Senate, but was voted down
Speaker 1: in the House. If it had passed, it could have
Speaker 1: laid the foundation for an anti hate bureaucracy identical to Sweden's,
Speaker 1: a bureaucracy which would redefine prejudice so as to make
Speaker 1: the Christian a lawbreaker.
Speaker 4: But the threat is not over. As Congress has reconvened
Speaker 4: in two thousand and one, the backers of this bill, undaunted,
Speaker 4: have resubmitted another very similar bill. Here's how our free
Speaker 4: speech is coming under attack. Anti hate legislation is the
Speaker 4: brainchild of the ultra powerful Anti Defamation League of Bnigh Beareth,
Speaker 4: or ADL, and this building behind me is the Seattle
Speaker 4: branch of the ADL, one of thirty nationwide local branches.
Speaker 4: Like spokes in a wheel, local offices follow directives and
Speaker 4: report back to the hub, which is the national headquarters
Speaker 4: in New York City. The ADL portrays itself as a
Speaker 4: Jewish civil liberties organization dedicated to protecting Jews from anti Semitism,
Speaker 4: as we will see in this video, its long term
Speaker 4: goal is to silence Christian and conservative political thought on
Speaker 4: the seventh floor of this building.
Speaker 2: And let's not forget that some university I think it's
Speaker 2: the place out of New York found that ninety percent
Speaker 2: of the Jews in Israel do not do not have
Speaker 2: any Semitic blood in them.
Speaker 4: Information has gathered throughout the Pacific Northwest concerning those the
Speaker 4: ADL considers a threat to its agenda, or in ADL terminology,
Speaker 4: those who are prejudiced. Inside computers store thousands of secret
Speaker 4: files on right wing conservative Americans, most of who may
Speaker 4: never have committed a crime.
Speaker 2: Remember that that's going to be important in the days ahead.
Speaker 3: When people that you know to start disappearing.
Speaker 4: Except perhaps criticizing the state of Israel. That is why
Speaker 4: even people's home addresses, drivers licenses, social security numbers, and
Speaker 4: personal information are listed in these files so that they
Speaker 4: can be identified quickly when such so called prejudice actually
Speaker 4: comes to be against the law of the land. Such
Speaker 4: Americans did not give the ADL permission to keep a
Speaker 4: secret DOSIA on them, but the ADL does it anyway.
Speaker 4: It's part of the ADL's database on right wing organizations,
Speaker 4: a database which the ADL shares not only with the
Speaker 4: FBI and Justice Department, but with local police, such as
Speaker 4: here in King County. Like the ancient Pharisees, whom Christ
Speaker 4: described as whitewashed. On the outside, the ADL gives the
Speaker 4: impression of a Jewish civil liberties organization with high minded intentions.
Speaker 4: Yet inside these walls are persons with a very different goal,
Speaker 4: not the elimination of hate, but the eventual elimination of
Speaker 4: free express direction of Christian conservative values. Here's how the
Speaker 4: ADL has been working to achieve that goal. During nineteen
Speaker 4: eighty eight, the ADL initiated a nationwide law student competition.
Speaker 3: Also, when we were looking at.
Speaker 2: The the International jew by Henry Ford, they were petitioning
Speaker 2: to have Christmas trees taken down in cities, in the
Speaker 2: burrows and stuff like that in New York a long
Speaker 2: time ago. We're talking about nineteen twenties era, right, So
Speaker 2: they're always trying to take down these symbols that we
Speaker 2: didn't think because they find them offensive. That less than
Speaker 2: two percent back then of the population found that offensive.
Speaker 2: So therefore the rest of the state has to comply
Speaker 2: to them right.
Speaker 4: To write a model anti hate law for America. This
Speaker 4: law would criminalize not just physical acts of racial violence,
Speaker 4: but statements that might lead to violence. On April twentieth
Speaker 4: through the twenty second of nineteen eighty eight, the ADL
Speaker 4: helped sponsor conference at New York's prestigious Hofstra University. It
Speaker 4: was entitled Group Defamation and Freedom of Speech The Relationship
Speaker 4: between Language and Violence. The winner of the hate crimes
Speaker 4: competition was announced as Joseph Ribakoff, a law student from
Speaker 4: Whittier College in California. The invitation to draft a group
Speaker 4: libel statute was a serious national competition, with students from
Speaker 4: the finest law schools in America competing. As such, when
Speaker 4: the ADL gave first prize to Joseph Ribakoff above many rivals,
Speaker 4: it tells us that the ADL jury liked very much
Speaker 4: what Ribikoff proposed. They saw Ribikoff's hard life legislative approached
Speaker 4: the group libel as a direction they wanted to explore.
Speaker 4: This is obvious because the second and third place winners
Speaker 4: were not nearly so harsh and repressive of free speech
Speaker 4: as Ribikoff. Let's review what the ADL found so agreeable
Speaker 4: within Ribikoff's proposal. First, Ribkoff asserts that just banning acts
Speaker 4: of hate motivated violence is not enough. The words that
Speaker 4: stimulate suspicion.
Speaker 2: I find it funny in these documentaries when they like
Speaker 2: shift angles. It's like, let me tell you about this,
Speaker 2: but I have to tell you over my right shoulder. Now,
Speaker 2: fiction impossible.
Speaker 4: Violence must also be criminalized. Yet what are words but
Speaker 4: the outward expression of ideas? Ribakoff wants to ban those
Speaker 4: seed ideas, which might conceivably be used as a pretext
Speaker 4: for bigotry and viol us. To enforce this ban on ideas,
Speaker 4: the ADL clearly favors Ribakoff's next proposal, state censorship. According
Speaker 4: to Ribakoff, state agencies should not only monitor and restrict
Speaker 4: free speech in general, but should censor all movies and
Speaker 4: videotapes that criticize identifiable groups.
Speaker 1: Any person, persons, or organization that publicly shows a film
Speaker 1: or movie before it has been submitted and reviewed by
Speaker 1: the agency shall have committed a misdemeanor.
Speaker 2: And law or not, the ADL will make demands and
Speaker 2: claims and shut things down, regardless of there being any
Speaker 2: kind of rule over it. They'll just make a stink
Speaker 2: about it. And who owns, who holds the purse strings,
Speaker 2: who gets to a manipulate that? So you have a
Speaker 2: they beniahbor lodge that spawned this ADL, and they have
Speaker 2: more power than they most certainly should have. They shouldn't
Speaker 2: have any.
Speaker 4: A misdemeanor means a crime. A crime committed requires a
Speaker 4: law enforcement, legal and penal establishment capable of punishing that crime. Again,
Speaker 4: the ADL looks with favor upon such law enforcement bureaucracy
Speaker 4: to prevent thought crimes in Canada. If one is accused
Speaker 4: of defaming an identifiable group and confesses quickly, he may
Speaker 4: be fined up to five thousand dollars and serve up
Speaker 4: to two years in prison. If he does not confess
Speaker 4: his guilt, he will be embroiled in costly legal entanglements.
Speaker 4: If he loses, he will again have to face fines
Speaker 4: and possible imprisonment. Because the ADL the first prize to
Speaker 4: such a system of harassment and prosecution, there is every
Speaker 4: indication that the ADL is delighted with river Koff's get
Speaker 4: tough proposals to criminalize thought crimes. But Ribkoff and the
Speaker 4: ADL want even More, rib Koff stipulates that anyone who
Speaker 4: is a member of an organization that has shown an
Speaker 4: unapproved film will also be criminalized. This means, for example,
Speaker 4: that if a large anti homosexual American organization such as
Speaker 4: Pat Robertson's Christian Coalition, produces a video critical of homosexuality.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but Pat Robinson's like the worst example, because he's
Speaker 2: a Christian scientist. Yeah.
Speaker 4: See, all of its tens of thousands of members may
Speaker 4: be indicted if they remain members. Refusal who abandon their
Speaker 4: loyalty will be.
Speaker 2: You hear that, So everybody who follows them would be libel.
Speaker 2: So you're a member of some.
Speaker 3: Sort of group, the whole group goes down, some.
Speaker 4: Contempt of court, and prison will follow. Not just the leadership,
Speaker 4: but also every single member who remains loyal will be
Speaker 4: embroiled in court. Balance, But surely, you may say, if
Speaker 4: the accused can defend the truth of his statements in court,
Speaker 4: he should have nothing to fear. Forget it. For Ribakoff,
Speaker 4: the criteria of guilt or innocence is not truth. Rather,
Speaker 4: if one verbally humiliates those who have been given federal
Speaker 4: status as members of a protected group and group libel
Speaker 4: has occurred. This is what he means when he says
Speaker 4: regulating group defamation is status based, not content based. The
Speaker 4: truth of the content of that so called libel does
Speaker 4: not matter.
Speaker 2: So just reporting the truth about history is enough, even
Speaker 2: if you don't put your own opinion into it. It's
Speaker 2: the mere fact that it could be offensive to people
Speaker 2: who we don't want their their truth to be known
Speaker 2: in the in the in the history of their action
Speaker 2: is to be public. Now they'll find that offensive, they'll
Speaker 2: cry about it, and then you're in jail, and then
Speaker 2: everybody else who agreed with you as well, if they're
Speaker 2: a member of some kind of group. On paper, it will.
Speaker 4: Not be admitted as evidence in court. Again, we should
Speaker 4: note that the other law students who won first and
Speaker 4: second Honorable Mention were not as extreme as Ribakoff. For example,
Speaker 4: Devin House, the second Honorable Mention, wants to outlaw group libel,
Speaker 4: but also wants truth to be the basis for acquittal,
Speaker 4: just as it is in conventional libel cases. Heidi Bakana
Speaker 4: first Honorable mention respects truth.
Speaker 2: Like what are we talking about here when truth doesn't matter?
Speaker 2: Who owns our country? Right? Because is this not is
Speaker 2: this a constitution based country? Has it been since I
Speaker 2: go out on the eighteen sixties?
Speaker 4: Here's more proof, then, also wants to define group libel
Speaker 4: as a false statement whose intent is not just to
Speaker 4: communicate but also to inflict harm. For Ribicoff, there is
Speaker 4: no such provision for truth. The only vital question in
Speaker 4: group libel laws is whether or not a group has
Speaker 4: felt emotionally damaged as a result of being criticized. If
Speaker 4: it does, group libel has occurred. Clearly, Ribikoff's proposal, favored
Speaker 4: by the ADL is a fiendish scheme to destroy from
Speaker 4: top to bottom Christian power as an effective force in
Speaker 4: the world. The ADL HOFTA conference was no mere academic exercise.
Speaker 4: As a result of a foundation of research and debate
Speaker 4: it laid down, the ADL created its own model anti
Speaker 4: hate law. During the early nineties, many state legislatures used
Speaker 4: the ADL model as a pattern for the creation of
Speaker 4: their own anti hate laws. Such local statutes redefined prejudice
Speaker 4: and greatly stiffened penalties against biased crimes. It is noteworthy
Speaker 4: that the Justice Department, in its present police Anti hate
Speaker 4: Training guidelines, praises the ADL's role and crafting the model
Speaker 4: legislation we have been discussing.
Speaker 2: That's because there's aavas on both sides, and that's one
Speaker 2: of the reasons why they shouldn't be part of any
Speaker 2: type of government, municipality, you know, small community, or federal
Speaker 2: at all, whatsoever. They should not be, especially if they're duties.
Speaker 2: But even if they're not, if they're expressing anti constitutional sentiment,
Speaker 2: why are they in office at all? Any politician in
Speaker 2: office who says that any one of the aspects of
Speaker 2: the Bill of Rights is somehow offensive or outdated, that's
Speaker 2: not that that should be a disqualification, and anytime they
Speaker 2: act against it, that should be grounds to remove them.
Speaker 2: So why doesn't that happen? Because it's all smoke and mirrors.
Speaker 2: It's not there anymore. The Constitution and the people who
Speaker 2: enforce it, which be us, haven't been doing so.
Speaker 4: If the ADL's anti hate laws are enacted, will the
Speaker 4: new Justice Department under Bush continue to lend its prestige
Speaker 4: to the ADL's anti hate agenda. Although the participants in
Speaker 4: the ADL's Hofstra conference were divided concerning the feasibility of
Speaker 4: such blatant censorship, the ADL remain determined that some kind
Speaker 4: of anti hate legislation become law. Thus, the ADL helped
Speaker 4: create the Hate Crime Statistic Act, which was passed by
Speaker 4: Congress in nineteen ninety. The Hate Crime Statistic Act requires
Speaker 4: states to determine if crimes committed under their jurisdiction are
Speaker 4: motivated by prejudice. These include serious crimes, but also such
Speaker 4: relatively minor offenses as vandalism, trespass, and threat. Local law
Speaker 4: enforcement are required to relay such information to a federal
Speaker 4: Anti hate Data Bank, then to be shared with law
Speaker 4: enforcement officials throughout the nation.
Speaker 1: Thus, if a homosexual is the victim of an offense
Speaker 1: as minor as vandalism, trespass, or threat, states are forced
Speaker 1: to determine if the offense were motivated by prejudice, a
Speaker 1: highly problematical and even tedious task. If so, details of.
Speaker 2: A is not tedious, someone else's dictating whether or not
Speaker 2: it is because they decided that it was because they
Speaker 2: find everything offensive.
Speaker 1: Homosexual's case are to be forwarded to the federal government
Speaker 1: if the person or group who committed the crime had
Speaker 1: not yet been found. The government's policy of sharing information
Speaker 1: concerning the case with state and local agencies might help
Speaker 1: to apprehend such persons. Thus, the long arm of the
Speaker 1: federal government could come to the aid of a homosexual
Speaker 1: victim in a way that would be out of the
Speaker 1: question for victims of crimes not motivated by prejudice.
Speaker 4: But the ADL wants the Justice Department to do more
Speaker 4: than simply record and share data. It wants federal prosecution
Speaker 4: of those who hate. So far, this has not been
Speaker 4: fully possible because the federal government lacks authority to one
Speaker 4: fully defined for the States what constitutes a violent hate crime,
Speaker 4: especially in regard to homosexuality. This bill would have given
Speaker 4: homosexuality virtually the same protection which race, religion, and gender
Speaker 4: now enjoy. Two determine the penalty for a violent hate crime.
Speaker 4: Three invade States rights in law enforcement except in six
Speaker 4: special circumstances such as jury tampering, voting fraud, interstate commerce.
Speaker 2: And so that's interesting to catch that last one invade
Speaker 2: States rights. Law of invade States rights in law enforcement
Speaker 2: go on.
Speaker 4: If the Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act of two thousand
Speaker 4: had been passed, the federal government would no longer have
Speaker 4: been restricted in its right to intervene in racial, religious,
Speaker 4: or ethnic violence on the state level. Nor would homosexuals
Speaker 4: any longer be without special federal protection.
Speaker 2: So this is dated, understand because regardless if they have
Speaker 2: this or that in place, they still act accordingly because
Speaker 2: it doesn't matter to them. They make the rules up
Speaker 2: as they go. It forces them as they go because
Speaker 2: they get pressure to do so. And all you need
Speaker 2: is cooperation on both sides, one who complains and another
Speaker 2: wave on the other side who pushes it through. We
Speaker 2: just saw it happened to Peanut. I mean four of
Speaker 2: Oyvays signed off. You know, they're the ones that pushed
Speaker 2: for that to happen.
Speaker 4: This act would have vastly increased the government's right to
Speaker 4: one define a violent hate crime, especially as it applies
Speaker 4: to homosexuals, to determine and enhance punishment for violent hate crimes.
Speaker 4: Three at will invade state jurisdictions to enforce anti hate laws.
Speaker 1: This bill would have been a stepping stone toward an
Speaker 1: anti hate bureaucracy. Eventually, Christian teachings condemning sodomy could be
Speaker 1: considered hateful. Fortunately, as a result of national alerts by
Speaker 1: Christian conservative leaders such as doctor D James Kennedy, a
Speaker 1: Republican House of Representatives was able to recognize the danger
Speaker 1: in this bill and defeat it. Yet the ADL never
Speaker 1: gives up. In two thousand one, a new, nearly identical
Speaker 1: bill was reintroduced to further the ADL agenda of ending
Speaker 1: free speech in America. Of course, this new bill, as
Speaker 1: six twenty two, does not hint that its ultimate objective
Speaker 1: is to end free speech. Rather, it requires federal jurisdiction
Speaker 1: and stiffer penalties only for violent hate crimes. Surely everyone
Speaker 1: agrees that violent crimes of hate.
Speaker 2: Well, if you offend somebody is considered genocide, when they
Speaker 2: can also consider that violent.
Speaker 1: Hate such as the Oklahoma's.
Speaker 3: All about the legalise the.
Speaker 1: City bombing, should be severely punished. Yet, if S six
Speaker 1: twenty two is passed in a few years, the ADL
Speaker 1: will orchestrate further legislation to achieve its true objectives. Tomorrow's
Speaker 1: legislation will amend S. Six twenty two to include hurtful
Speaker 1: speech as a hate crime. Such speech will be dramatized
Speaker 1: as the underlying cause of hate motivated violence. Such thought
Speaker 1: crimes will then be prosecuted under a federal law enforcement
Speaker 1: apparatus originally set up only to punish physical acts of
Speaker 1: hate motivated violence.
Speaker 4: If hurtful speech is outlawed, power over the accused will
Speaker 4: be in the hands of those who define what hurtful
Speaker 4: speech is. If it means criticizing an identifiable group of people,
Speaker 4: then such criticism will be against the law. What is
Speaker 4: hurtful speech Under existing laws, verbal threat against the safety
Speaker 4: of persons or groups is called harassment or intimidation. Such
Speaker 4: threat is adequately criminalized under state law. Why isn't the
Speaker 4: ADL content with such state laws because they don't outlaw
Speaker 4: the ADL's true enemy. The ADL's enemies are those like
Speaker 4: my wife and myself, who, out of love for the
Speaker 4: Jewish people, are morally obligated to criticize Zionism's bad leadership
Speaker 4: and false teachings. Yet the ADL wants to transform any
Speaker 4: criticism of matters Jewish into anti Semitism, a form of hate.
Speaker 4: For the ADL, the criteria of whether a crime or
Speaker 4: even an editorial is antisemitic is whether it contains anti
Speaker 4: Jewish criticism.
Speaker 2: Thus, in con so, it said, Israel has become America's spoiled,
Speaker 2: pampered children. America became Israel before Israel became Israel. Let
Speaker 2: me just go ahead and read something to you. So
Speaker 2: they have this thing called the Matthew Shepherd and James
Speaker 2: Byrd Hate Crimes Prevention Act. It says as a landmark
Speaker 2: United States federal law passed on October twenty second, two
Speaker 2: thousand and nine, as a signed into law by President
Speaker 2: Barack oh my goodness Obama on October twenty eighth, two
Speaker 2: thousand and nine as a writer to the National Defense
Speaker 2: Authorization Act the NDAA Everybody for twenty ten Hr two
Speaker 2: six four seven. Conceived as a response to the murders,
Speaker 2: of course, so then they find or wait, but usually
Speaker 2: create a situation that pulls on the heartstrings of sentimental,
Speaker 2: empathetic Americans to where it would be completely offensive and
Speaker 2: terrible to argue with, right, because poor Matthew Shepherd was
Speaker 2: an American student at the University of Wyoming who was beaten,
Speaker 2: tortured and left to die and your later of me
Speaker 2: on the night of October sixth, nineteen eighty eight, okay, probably,
Speaker 2: and they're saying there was related to him being gay, apparently.
Speaker 2: And then James Bird Junior was an American man who
Speaker 2: was murdered by three men, two of whom were avowed
Speaker 2: white supremacists, in Jasper, Texas. No one says anything what
Speaker 2: James Bird did to I don't know provoke that see
Speaker 2: raping and killing people. No one says they dragged him
Speaker 2: for three miles behind a Ford pickup truck along an
Speaker 2: asphalt road. So naturally, now they have their two people
Speaker 2: they can move forward with.
Speaker 3: And pass this bill of hate crimes.
Speaker 2: The bill also removes, in the case of hate crimes
Speaker 2: related to the race, color, religion, or national origin of
Speaker 2: the victim, the prerequisite that the victim be engaged in
Speaker 2: a federally protected activity like voting or going to school.
Speaker 2: Gives federal authorities greater ability to engage in hate crimes
Speaker 2: investigations that local authorities choose not to pursue. Gives the
Speaker 2: federal authorities ability to step into your local authorities positions
Speaker 2: and takeover. Provides five million per year in funding for
Speaker 2: fiscal year twenty ten to twelve, so obviously they're sure
Speaker 2: it's more. Now requires the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The
Speaker 2: FBI detracts statistics on hate crimes based on gender and
Speaker 2: gender identity, So it takes a gay president to really
Speaker 2: get that going. And you can't argue with a brown
Speaker 2: president because that would just be racist, right, yeah, it
Speaker 2: says the larm The shepherd one says the attack was
Speaker 2: widely reported due to him being gay. Whether that's true
Speaker 2: or not, who knows, but that's what they're going to use.
Speaker 2: And the trial employed a gay panic defense. They're calling
Speaker 2: it homophobia. Let me tell you something, they'll be he's afraid
Speaker 2: of gay people. Okay, unless you're cornered by twelve of
Speaker 2: them in jail. Maybe then you'd be homophobic, because that's
Speaker 2: what that word means.
Speaker 1: Anyway.
Speaker 2: Moving on.
Speaker 4: Corational testimony promoting anti hate laws, the ADL says anti
Speaker 4: Jewish statements constitute clear evidence of anti Semitism.
Speaker 2: Of course, but does anybody even know if they're even
Speaker 2: Semitic when they make these claims or they just imposters.
Speaker 2: And even if they were, you know, I don't see
Speaker 2: any Muslims using that, not that I like Muslim fanaticism
Speaker 2: at all. We're going to talk about the false Andalusian
Speaker 2: Golden Age here in future episodes. As I'm reading this
Speaker 2: book here, all I'm saying is, you know, the inquisition
Speaker 2: to clean out Spain might not have been such a
Speaker 2: bad thing, and of course it was a bad thing
Speaker 2: when they put Takamata in there. Who is guess what
Speaker 2: in Oiva to conduct that awful interesting choice, being that
Speaker 2: they were trying to get rid of OIV and Muslim
Speaker 2: subversives in Spain, that was the whole purpose of that.
Speaker 2: So it kind of took a left turn. Naturally, as
Speaker 2: things do get co opted.
Speaker 4: Is this in the Old Testament prophets scathingly tongue lash
Speaker 4: the people of Israel for their sins. If the ADL
Speaker 4: definition of anti Semitism is correct and criticizing Jews in
Speaker 4: their religion is hateful, then Christ and the biblical prophets
Speaker 4: were among the most outspoken anti Semites the world has
Speaker 4: ever known.
Speaker 2: So was more and Luther. So it was Henry Ford right,
Speaker 2: all these people who told the truth.
Speaker 4: Instead, they resorted to verbally violent language in hopes that
Speaker 4: such tough love would shock the Jews into repentance and
Speaker 4: save their souls.
Speaker 2: And that was a picture of Sanhedrin level elders right wise,
Speaker 2: men Council of Elders.
Speaker 4: Yet, if the ADL has its way, the modern counterpart
Speaker 4: of the Old Testament prophets, those who, out of concern
Speaker 4: for Israel, criticize it for its sins could become guilty
Speaker 4: of hate crimes. Christian missionary organizations which criticize Judaism for
Speaker 4: rejecting its messiah an attempt to convert Jews away from
Speaker 4: it could eventually be indicted as haters.
Speaker 2: And just so we can read this real quick, so
Speaker 2: it says the Sanhedrin a was as if it's that's
Speaker 2: still a thing, as what do you think, Well, those
Speaker 2: little hasis the little penguins are that stand around presidents
Speaker 2: and smile and grin when they get their way. And
Speaker 2: as you see a president signing something that's completely offensive
Speaker 2: to American culture and values at his desk and they're
Speaker 2: all standing around him, every single president. Basically, who do
Speaker 2: you think is the advisors to the king or president?
Speaker 2: The Sanhedrin was a court was is a court a
Speaker 2: Jewish court and council with religious, civil, and criminal jurisdiction
Speaker 2: during the time of the yeah, during the time of now.
Speaker 3: Definition this is ai.
Speaker 2: The Sanhedrin was the highest court in council is the
Speaker 2: highest court in council of the Jewish nation of Jewish nation.
Speaker 2: The term comes from the Greek word sidney dringan, which
Speaker 2: means counsel. The Sanhedrin judges judge accused law breakers but
Speaker 2: could not initiate arrests, required minimum of two witnesses to
Speaker 2: convict the suspect. Okay, well, let's take a look at
Speaker 2: what it means to be a caa hall. The gohl
Speaker 2: is a Hebrew word that means community or assembly. It
Speaker 2: refers to the local government body of Jewish community, so
Speaker 2: basically a more localized subsection or a division of the
Speaker 2: person who did the people who kind of lay down
Speaker 2: the law as dictated by the Council of Elderts, the
Speaker 2: laws and learned elders of Zion, if you will, in
Speaker 2: local communities. Uh, they try to isolate it to just
Speaker 2: being in Europe. The kahl was an autonomous government. Is
Speaker 2: an autonomous government that administered the community's collective taxation and
Speaker 2: was granted autonomy by the government. In other matters, yeah,
Speaker 2: they work outside of They have their own laws in
Speaker 2: their own little communities in New York and things of
Speaker 2: that nature, and of other places. But pretty much every
Speaker 2: place that they have their own little communities they self govern,
Speaker 2: have their own schools, have their own courthouses, and so
Speaker 2: on and so forth. So it's like a it's almost
Speaker 2: like an embassy it's a what they call it, a
Speaker 2: celebration city, if you want to use a Disney term.
Speaker 5: Right for the ADL, a little has changed since those
Speaker 5: who criticized the Jewish people were stoned.
Speaker 1: Thus, while promoting freedom for Jews, the ADL has a
Speaker 1: proven record of subtly working to limit freedom for others. Ultimately,
Speaker 1: the ADL will pressure the government to extend the term
Speaker 1: hate crime to include hurtful words against identifiable groups. Anyone
Speaker 1: who heckled marchers in a gay pride parade would then
Speaker 1: have committed a criminal act.
Speaker 3: So think about that.
Speaker 2: If what you're doing limiteds the freedoms of someone else
Speaker 2: through common law, that would be null and void. Another proofing,
Speaker 2: if you will, if you need one, that there is
Speaker 2: no there is no. It's all a facade smoking mirrors
Speaker 2: that you have a structure of government that's there to
Speaker 2: do certain things to continue to society moving in a
Speaker 2: good way, or that is there to protect your individual rights.
Speaker 2: That's all nice and fine on paper that they don't
Speaker 2: look at anymore, but it's not active upon in reality.
Speaker 2: And if anything, obviously it's attacked and without anybody in government,
Speaker 2: because it's been co opted and infiltrated to defend constitutional rights,
Speaker 2: or at least not honestly and sincerely, because there's always
Speaker 2: that game of Jesuit theater, as they call it, where
Speaker 2: you do the pantomime and then you lose, but you
Speaker 2: put up the good fight and then you're some sort
Speaker 2: of hero to the right or whatever. All bullshit. It's
Speaker 2: all just games. So oh, we fought the good battle. Yeah, okay.
Speaker 2: The outcome was very predetermined, because it's just to make
Speaker 2: the people think that there's something there, there's a potential
Speaker 2: or a hope that something's going to get better, and
Speaker 2: that you know, rationality and logic will and reason will
Speaker 2: return to the world. And it's not true. It's not
Speaker 2: true because there's nobody there to really do that. It
Speaker 2: has to be done by the people.
Speaker 1: Ultimately, even pastors who heaped guilt and shame upon sinners
Speaker 1: might be open to the charge of hurtful words.
Speaker 4: You may ask what possible motivation could this Jewish Civil
Speaker 4: Liberties organization have for curtailing free speech. The answer lies
Speaker 4: and the ambitions and destiny of Israel.
Speaker 1: The biblical profit such as Isaiah foretold today when Judy
Speaker 1: is and will no longer be accosted with opposition and criticism.
Speaker 1: The role of the ABL for the last three quarters
Speaker 1: of a century has been to help create such a
Speaker 1: worldwide criticism free zone for Israel, Israel's first prime.
Speaker 2: And by Israel, you have to understand they mean everywhere
Speaker 2: they've conquered, not just Israel. Otherwise, why would they be
Speaker 2: enforcing it on Americans if they didn't already own US?
Speaker 1: Minister David Benngarion in a Look magazine.
Speaker 3: Article, Bengarian, the.
Speaker 2: Mobster right the terrorists.
Speaker 1: Gives us more than a hint of the new world
Speaker 1: order presided over by Israel, which Zionism and the ABL
Speaker 1: are working to create. All continents will become united in
Speaker 1: a world Alliance, at whose disposal will be an international
Speaker 1: police force. All armies will be abolished, and there will
Speaker 1: be no more war. In Jerusalem, the United Nations are
Speaker 1: truly united nations will build a shrine of the Prophets
Speaker 1: to serve the federated union of all continents. This will
Speaker 1: be the seat of the supreme Court of mankind to
Speaker 1: settle all controversies among the federated continents. As prophesied by
Speaker 1: Isaiah describing the aspirations of Zionism, Sir Winston Churchill, writing
Speaker 1: in the Illustrated Sunday Herald of February.
Speaker 2: They don't look deep enough into Churchill in this documentary.
Speaker 2: They kind of champion him, which is a little said.
Speaker 1: Nineteen twenty also presents what amounts to a prophetic description
Speaker 1: of how the ADL would Sunday be assaulting freedom. It
Speaker 1: may well be that this the same astounding race may,
Speaker 1: at the present time be in the actual process of
Speaker 1: producing another system of morals and astounding.
Speaker 3: I would have gone with outrageous or offensive.
Speaker 1: Race philosophy, ass or malicious evolent as Christianity was benevolent,
Speaker 1: which if not arrested, would shatter irretrievably, all that Christianity
Speaker 1: had rendered possible. It would almost seem as if the
Speaker 1: Gospel of Christ and the Gospel of Antichrist were destined
Speaker 1: to originate among the same people.
Speaker 4: Few Americans realized that already in such countries as Sweden,
Speaker 4: West Germany, Britain, Israel, and Canada, laws banning hurtful words
Speaker 4: against groups of people are already on the books. In Canada,
Speaker 4: if we follow a twenty five year old paper trail
Speaker 4: of newspaper articles, court documents and articles in the Jewish press.
Speaker 4: We find again and again two organizations which have played
Speaker 4: the pivotal role in making hate laws happen. They are
Speaker 4: the Canadian Colleagues of the Anti Defamation League of the
Speaker 4: Nibreath then I Beareth Canada, and the Canadian Jewish Congress.
Speaker 4: Other groups may be involved in the externals of anti
Speaker 4: hate lobbying, yet both behind the scenes and in the forefront,
Speaker 4: the Canadian Jewish Congress and Benigbreath Canada provide the focus
Speaker 4: and energy for Canada's rapidly evolving thought crime statutes.
Speaker 2: A people with such little, such little number, has an
Speaker 2: awful lot of representation, don't they.
Speaker 4: As a result of their tireless lobbying efforts, the Canadian
Speaker 4: Parliament in nineteen seventy one banned all written or broadcast
Speaker 4: statements which seek to cause humiliation to certain identifiable groups.
Speaker 1: Under such laws, Doctor Paul Cameron, nationally recognized opponent of
Speaker 1: gay rights, made arrangements for a public lecture in Canada
Speaker 1: in which the homosexual lifestyle would be criticized. When he
Speaker 1: arrived at the border, the cases of books and literature
Speaker 1: he brought with him were impounded. He was told that
Speaker 1: in Canada it is against the law to humiliate homosexuals publicly.
Speaker 4: As anti hate legislation goes before Congress, the media continue
Speaker 4: to focus on racial violence, holding up the Aryan Nations,
Speaker 4: the Kuplux Klan, and skinheads as examples of what society
Speaker 4: should outlaw.
Speaker 2: And lat thos are created by agencies so that they
Speaker 2: have something to point at and say, look at this epidemic,
Speaker 2: look at this problem, Look at all these racists. Now
Speaker 2: other people organically follow that, because it's everybody, this seems
Speaker 2: has a little bit of a brain dysfunction when it
Speaker 2: comes to joining things. And oh, I finally got permission
Speaker 2: to talk to do this because other people are doing
Speaker 2: it type of thing, right, But it's not always organic.
Speaker 2: And if there is ever any kind of group established
Speaker 2: with a good purpose, it will be co opted by agencies.
Speaker 2: They will be amongst your numbers. It will happen, and
Speaker 2: then they will steer it into a direction, and they
Speaker 2: will do things in the name of the group in
Speaker 2: order to bring criticism and hostility among the people against
Speaker 2: you on purpose, so that they can manipulate and squash
Speaker 2: any true or honest attempt to resist horrible shit that
Speaker 2: you know, groups like these the oyvays will try to
Speaker 2: enforce upon you, so they like to create. They even
Speaker 2: sometimes fund these types of organizations and on the sly
Speaker 2: so that they have something that they have opposition to,
Speaker 2: so that they are not they are defined by their
Speaker 2: oppressors right. And then if there isn't one organically, they
Speaker 2: will create one.
Speaker 4: Yet it is you and I thinking. Christians are a
Speaker 4: conservative event of mind who are in danger of being silenced,
Speaker 4: while gays, communists, abortionists, and radical feminists are not seen
Speaker 4: as those who hate. Every kind of right winger from
Speaker 4: Jerry Folwell to the Aryan Nations is increasingly perceived as
Speaker 4: a source of hurtful words. In fact, Christianity itself is
Speaker 4: coming under scrutiny as a source of hate. Christianity, because
Speaker 4: of its absolutes of right and wrong, is increasingly viewed
Speaker 4: as intolerant and judgmental.
Speaker 1: A major reason why anti hate legislation is so dangerous
Speaker 1: is that the definition of prejudice, the condition it claims
Speaker 1: to oppose, is ambiguous. A pastor would not think that
Speaker 1: a form of prejudice to warn a homosexual from his deviant,
Speaker 1: soul damning lifestyle. That gay rights groups and the ADL
Speaker 1: would testimony of the ADL before Congress makes it clear
Speaker 1: that the ADL is pushing.
Speaker 2: So people who have mental illnesses are the ones that
Speaker 2: we have to worry about offending. I think people with
Speaker 2: mental illnesses are offended by a lot of things. They
Speaker 2: probably shouldn't be, But they are awfully in your face
Speaker 2: about stuff, aren't they. It's like, hey, you don't even
Speaker 2: let us try to ignore this. You come into our schools,
Speaker 2: you come into our libraries, and you push the stuff
Speaker 2: on our children. That's not okay. You've crossed the line.
Speaker 2: You paray down our streets when are without any warning,
Speaker 2: in our communities with our children, to have to witness
Speaker 2: that type of retarded behavior, and you think that that's okay.
Speaker 2: How offended would they be if there is a heterosexual
Speaker 2: pride parade.
Speaker 1: Wishing hard for national acceptance of its definitions, The ADL
Speaker 1: would prefer that number one federal definitions of prejudice being
Speaker 1: modeled after the point of view of the ADL. Number two,
Speaker 1: law enforcement personnel should defer to ADL definitions of prejudice
Speaker 1: when filling out reports on criminal investigations.
Speaker 2: Do you understand how dangerous that is and wickedly evil?
Speaker 2: How manipulated and controlled and how freedom destructive that is.
Speaker 2: The ideal gets to dictate this to everybody. They're doing
Speaker 2: it to social media, They're doing it everywhere place, in
Speaker 2: shape and form. It's a thing. It does happen daily
Speaker 2: multiple times. If you don't let them in. They utilize
Speaker 2: other agencies to kick open doors. And it's not like
Speaker 2: the agencies, like the three letter ones don't have access
Speaker 2: to all social media so that they can monitor make
Speaker 2: their little threat assessments for the day that they go
Speaker 2: to start rounding people up right and as like I
Speaker 2: always say, they're going to take the chest pieces off
Speaker 2: the board, the powerful ones, the ones that could be
Speaker 2: leaders in I don't know, defending sensibility, family human rights,
Speaker 2: actual human rights, not sub human rights that these people
Speaker 2: like to promote. But you know, for the minorities, for
Speaker 2: the very tiny few that are mental defectives, these people
Speaker 2: are all about supporting them because it's destruction of society
Speaker 2: to do so, and that's what they're all about, erosion,
Speaker 2: weakening and destruction.
Speaker 1: Nations and three law enforcement personnel should submit themselves to
Speaker 1: ADL LED sensitivity training, making them compliant with ADL definitions
Speaker 1: of prejudice Further, the ad L requests from Congress that
Speaker 1: investigating officers should be allowed to determine before trial whether
Speaker 1: the accused is motivated by prejudice. This would set up
Speaker 1: the local police, assisted by the ADL guidelines, as a
Speaker 1: sort of preliminary jury. This power over the accused is
Speaker 1: very ominous, because if prejudice is determined, the ADL wants
Speaker 1: the prime considered much more serious with a stiffer sentence.
Speaker 4: Clearly, anti hate legislation is an opportunity for the ADL
Speaker 4: to intimidate and manipulate Americans. As stated earlier, the ADL
Speaker 4: exerted relentless pressure upon the Canadian government to ban group defamation.
Speaker 4: They succeeded. Now Canadians are in danger of prosecution if
Speaker 4: they criticize homosexuality publicly, or even state publicly that gays
Speaker 4: have a higher rate of AIDS than anyone else in America.
Speaker 4: The ADL is working even harder. Their initial intention is
Speaker 4: not to ban free speech entirely, but to convince us
Speaker 4: that certain forms of speech can be outlawed without doing
Speaker 4: violence to freedom of expression in general.
Speaker 3: So here's another thing.
Speaker 1: Have you.
Speaker 2: Looked at the tumut or any of the things that
Speaker 2: the Zionists were saying during World War one and two.
Speaker 2: I mean, what is, if nothing else, a plan for
Speaker 2: genocide of nations, all nations that aren't them? How is
Speaker 2: that not hate speech? How is that not a plot?
Speaker 2: How is that not an actual agenda to murder millions
Speaker 2: upon millions of people? Billions of people? But yet they're
Speaker 2: the ones, the ones they want to murder billions of people,
Speaker 2: are the ones who are defining.
Speaker 3: What hate speech is?
Speaker 2: That all they have is hate, envy, jealousy discussed, treachery
Speaker 2: and usury, and of course a pensiant to rape little
Speaker 2: children and eat them. But other than that, they seem
Speaker 2: like great guys and girls.
Speaker 4: Arle Incredibly, despite its Orwellian overtones, this legislation has encountered
Speaker 4: little significant opposition. Few recognize it as the foundation upon
Speaker 4: which a system of police states, spying, and censorship can
Speaker 4: be built. Throughout the last three quarters of a century,
Speaker 4: the ADL has justified its incredible power in the following way.
Speaker 4: It says that, since hatred and intolerance are a huge
Speaker 4: and complicated problem, a very complex and even powerful watchdog
Speaker 4: organization is necessary to keep tabs on it. If there
Speaker 4: had been an ADL in Germany. We are told there
Speaker 4: would have been no Holocaust against the Jews.
Speaker 3: Hey, newsflash, there wasn't.
Speaker 4: The ADL clearly business, and that business involves increasing restraint
Speaker 4: of the free speech of Christians and conservatives. It also
Speaker 4: means spying on such Americans. Let's turn our attention now.
Speaker 6: To what the ADL above me is doing at this
Speaker 6: moment and how that affects our lives. To do that,
Speaker 6: we must consider briefly how the ADL came into being.
Speaker 1: In eighteen forty two in New York, a Jewish fraternal organization,
Speaker 1: an i Breath, was founded, eventually.
Speaker 3: Meaning talmudic cabalistic?
Speaker 2: Is there a whole lot of love for anybody but
Speaker 2: Judaism at large in those pages and a lot of
Speaker 2: hatred and plotting to kill and making laws allowing the
Speaker 2: raping of children under three?
Speaker 3: What else? That's that the neighboreth for you?
Speaker 2: And that's who's that's who spawned the ADO, and that's
Speaker 2: who's going to dictate what's acceptable, And that's who does
Speaker 2: it dictate what's acceptable and what isn't How interesting.
Speaker 1: Book?
Speaker 2: Again, remember we're totally not already the first Israel. Sure
Speaker 2: sure not of course not no, no, that'd be silly.
Speaker 1: According to the Encyclopedia Judaica, two thousand, three hundred Bannibreath
Speaker 1: lodges what exist worldwide, with five hundred thousand male and
Speaker 1: two hundred and ten thousand female members. In the early
Speaker 1: twentieth century, the propaganda arm of bn I Bereath was created.
Speaker 2: Did you see that date? Nineteen thirteen? Why is that significant? Well,
Speaker 2: that's the day they pointed their biggest embassy on here,
Speaker 2: the Federal Reserve controlled by City of London, foreign bankers,
Speaker 2: but o EVAs. So it's just kind of funny how
Speaker 2: that all just crept up in there at the same time,
Speaker 2: isn't it. And that I'm sure they're not going to
Speaker 2: talk about Brandeis, but how his hand was in all that.
Speaker 1: The Anti Defamation League's main purpose was to protect Jews
Speaker 1: from anti Semitism. During the nineteen thirties, with the rise
Speaker 1: of fascism, the ADL began to flex its muscles powerfully.
Speaker 1: It attacked any real or potential threats to Jewish and
Speaker 1: eventually Israel's interests.
Speaker 2: The ADL established Judaism declares war on Germany.
Speaker 3: When did that happen?
Speaker 2: Yeah, before anything else happened, they declared war on Germany, pished.
Speaker 1: An incredibly complex and efficient network of propaganda outlets. These
Speaker 1: exerted tremendous influence over the way Americans began to view
Speaker 1: Jewish issues.
Speaker 4: Increasingly, the ADL has convinced Americans that any criticism of
Speaker 4: Jewish behavior or the behavior of the State of Israel
Speaker 4: bordered on anti Semitism. It is no accident that today
Speaker 4: the accusation of anti Semitism is the kiss of death
Speaker 4: to the career of any public figure. For more than
Speaker 4: three quarters of a century, the ADL has single handedly
Speaker 4: influenced every aspect of our society to make criticism of
Speaker 4: anything Jewish and nearly unforgivable sin. How extensive is the
Speaker 4: ADL's propaganda and information gathering outreach, Listen to Congressman John
Speaker 4: Rerick in testimony before Congress in nineteen seventy one.
Speaker 1: The world's largest spy network, the ADL, the anti defamation
Speaker 1: need is either too powerful to be curbed or too
Speaker 1: well embedded to be mentioned or to come under public scrutiny.
Speaker 1: What is the ADL. It is a private investigating organization
Speaker 1: engaged in spying and preparing secret dosias and purports, which
Speaker 1: it uses to suppress free speech and discussion and to
Speaker 1: influence public thought and sentiment of an unsuspecting citizen. Rate
Speaker 1: How powerful is the ADL, According to Congressman Reerck, the
Speaker 1: CIA and the FBI are tinker toys compared.
Speaker 2: To Yeah, and they also commit assassinations, maybe not directly,
Speaker 2: but sometimes directly in other countries, and maybe here. Any
Speaker 2: type of spy agency also snuffs people out. And it's
Speaker 2: funny that, let's say, the CI in FBI or tinker
Speaker 2: toys compared to the ADEL. The ADL uses a CIA
Speaker 2: and FBI as their own toys to the a d L.
Speaker 1: In the congressional record, Congressman Reck quotes the late Senator
Speaker 1: Jack Tenney of California, who said, the Anti Defamation League
Speaker 1: of the Niborrith has become the world's most powerful DESTOPO,
Speaker 1: the brain center of a vast spine.
Speaker 3: More like Cheka but okay.
Speaker 1: Well, and the intelligence unit of a myriad of Jewish organizations.
Speaker 1: Their secret agents spy upon American citizens extensive files and dosia.
Speaker 2: So what do you think they're doing with social media?
Speaker 2: How many files do you think they have with the
Speaker 2: metadeta that people have provided willfully over the years, a
Speaker 2: couple of decades. Right when the time comes, it'll be
Speaker 2: quiet three am at your home, children sleeping before the
Speaker 2: flash ban. Gernad ends up in the crib because they
Speaker 2: know the layout of your home, because they check brooplets first,
Speaker 2: so they know where to harm your children, kill your animals.
Speaker 2: And of course if you put up any type of
Speaker 2: resistance at the appalling nature of that type of new
Speaker 2: nock grade, then you'll also be killed.
Speaker 1: Those are compiled on those whom they dislike. Throughout their
Speaker 1: multitudinous controls of the media of communications, they are capable
Speaker 1: of destroying reputations and silencing all your bottle. A memorandum
Speaker 1: from the local ADL office charging that a particular candidate
Speaker 1: is anti Semitic or supported by someone else alleged to
Speaker 1: the anti semitic, is sufficient to defeat that candidate.
Speaker 3: Alleged to be.
Speaker 2: Because they make these definitions and these accusations, they don't
Speaker 2: have them. They're not put under scrutiny, they're not checked
Speaker 2: for validity.
Speaker 4: The ADL's national headquarters in New York City directs a
Speaker 4: vast army of informers in its network of regional offices
Speaker 4: such as this tabulating, evaluating, cataloging, and filing information on
Speaker 4: anti Semitism.
Speaker 1: We are beginning to understand something of the magnitude of
Speaker 1: the ADL's operation. We are beginning to appreciate its vast
Speaker 1: spy network sprawling across the nation and throughout the world.
Speaker 1: Our imagination is stagnant by its apparent control of the
Speaker 1: avenues of communication.
Speaker 2: Every ADL, all the ovays, I mean, if you look
Speaker 2: at any of the broadcasting stations they were founded like Sarnoff.
Speaker 2: You know, they owned them from the beginning with them
Speaker 2: and bought out a lot of radio owned all the
Speaker 2: media shape our world, shape our thoughts about things, and
Speaker 2: of course would have complete access, will give complete access
Speaker 2: to their boys to monitor any type of activity on
Speaker 2: those regardless if it's a new station or a social
Speaker 2: media platform.
Speaker 4: Office is divided into two levels of activity. The most
Speaker 4: visible is the ADL propaganda program. This favors Jewish and
Speaker 4: Zionist interests through a vast and incredibly complex network of
Speaker 4: contacts with government, the media, education, cultural organizations, and churches.
Speaker 4: The ADL endeavors to portray Jews, Judaism, and the State
Speaker 4: of Israel in a favorable light on the other hand,
Speaker 4: those who criticize Jewish behavior or institutions are villains.
Speaker 2: Remember Israel a terrorist state created by terrorists, right, the
Speaker 2: burn Gang Stern Gang. Sorry, that's just one of them.
Speaker 2: You're talking about terrorists who created a terrorist date, who
Speaker 2: are committing terrorism all day long, every.
Speaker 4: Day, qualify through these propaganda outlets as haters, bigots, racists,
Speaker 4: and anti Semitic creatures so depraved that they should be
Speaker 4: denied any voice in public life.
Speaker 3: Just to balance this, in.
Speaker 2: Muslim conquered Visigoth Spain, the Muslims had their own spy
Speaker 2: agency as well and did very same similar things to
Speaker 2: keep that. I mean, there were Christians that were converted
Speaker 2: there so that they weren't murdered. People who had religion
Speaker 2: converted so that they wouldn't be murdered, many fled, All
Speaker 2: churches were destroyed, turned into mosques, and there were people
Speaker 2: roaming the streets monitoring the daily activities of people to
Speaker 2: make sure that they were keeping law Islamic law, and
Speaker 2: did be very stiff punishments for those who did not
Speaker 2: very public. They did a lot of crucifixions, They did
Speaker 2: a lot of head They did a lot of beheadings, right,
Speaker 2: to incite fear and terror into people. Having spies is
Speaker 2: nothing new, but they always have the same objective right
Speaker 2: to take, and control and kill.
Speaker 4: It is because of the threat posed by such so
Speaker 4: called haters that a top priority of the eighties is
Speaker 4: the creation of anti hate laws, which will criminalize anyone
Speaker 4: who criticizes Jewish interests or the state of Israel. The
Speaker 4: second level of ADL activity is its intelligence arm, or
Speaker 4: what it calls its fact finding operations. Over the last
Speaker 4: three quarters of a century, the ADL has amassed an
Speaker 4: enormous file on thousands of Americans whom the ADL suspects
Speaker 4: are critical of Jewish interests or could be. This file
Speaker 4: contains the names not just of those visible critics of Israel,
Speaker 4: but of right wing conservatives who may over the years,
Speaker 4: have given some indication that they disapproved of Zionists behavior.
Speaker 2: The end, do you honestly think that Pat Robertson, that's
Speaker 2: a funny one, isn't anting but a Christian Zionist?
Speaker 3: And who created them?
Speaker 2: Frankists? Right crypto Frankists Cryptovase.
Speaker 4: The ADL has made it clear in its.
Speaker 2: Writings when I said created them, I didn't mean the
Speaker 2: seven hundred club. I was referring to the veterans that
Speaker 2: spawned this idea of Christian Zionism in the first place, that.
Speaker 4: It considers all religious political conservatives to be potential anti
Speaker 4: Semites worthy of surveillance.
Speaker 2: In some acts as agents on the other side right
Speaker 2: controlled opposition.
Speaker 4: During the early nineteen nineties, the nation had a very
Speaker 4: rare opportunity to see the cloak pulled off ADL secrecy
Speaker 4: and to find out how extensive is its spying activity.
Speaker 4: In the nineteen eighties, the San Francisco and Portland, Oregon
Speaker 4: Police Departments illegally created extensive files on right wing conservative,
Speaker 4: white supremacist and skinhead groups. Ultimately, the apartment files were
Speaker 4: sent to the Intelligence division of the San Francisco Police Department.
Speaker 3: So think about it.
Speaker 2: Once you've identified yourself as supporting of something like that,
Speaker 2: there's infiltrators in that group. They will do something that
Speaker 2: the group typically never would do, but then that demonizes
Speaker 2: every They do it to militias, they'll do it to,
Speaker 2: you know, people who want to maintain their ethnicity and
Speaker 2: culture or their rights as human beings, and they'll do
Speaker 2: something through those agencies as members to give the others
Speaker 2: that type of you know, they give the impression that
Speaker 2: these people are all violent killers and all this other stuff.
Speaker 2: It's disgusting. It happens often. Is any of it organic,
Speaker 2: Maybe not all of it, for sure, Most of it
Speaker 2: is infiltrated. Most of it is done and conducted through
Speaker 2: people who are agents in these places, because if they
Speaker 2: can't get them, if they can't get people to take
Speaker 2: the bait, they're not going to rely on you know,
Speaker 2: chance or luck. They'll make it happen so that it
Speaker 2: does so that they can and they'll assist in the
Speaker 2: body count. They don't care if they kill other Jews,
Speaker 2: they don't care if they kill Blacks, they don't care
Speaker 2: if they kill whoever, as long as it pushes their
Speaker 2: agenda forward.
Speaker 4: There they merged with the San Francisco Files. An ADL spy,
Speaker 4: Roy Bullock was able to obtain the names of these
Speaker 4: persons and organizations illegally. He did so with the assistance
Speaker 4: of a San Francisco police officer, Tom Girard. In nineteen
Speaker 4: eighty nine, the Spotlight newspaper exposed Roy Bullock as an
Speaker 4: ADL spy. Warrants were obtained and the police searched ADL
Speaker 4: offices in San Francisco and Los Angeles, plus Bullock's residents.
Speaker 4: Before we tell you the details of what the police
Speaker 4: found in this search, you should know that any illegal
Speaker 4: penetration of police intelligence files or law enforcement computer databases
Speaker 4: is a felony and conspiracy. Only one conviction of such
Speaker 4: an offense can send the average citizen to prison. When
Speaker 4: police accessed Roy Bullock's computer, they found that the ADL
Speaker 4: and Bullock had indeed penetrated restricted San Francisco Police Department
Speaker 4: intelligence files and law enforcement computerized databases. In fact, they
Speaker 4: had violated the law beyond most people's wildest dreams. Although
Speaker 4: the ADL had obtained illegal information from an officer in
Speaker 4: the San Francisco Police Department, the department did a very
Speaker 4: thorough and impartial investigation of how it had been penetrated
Speaker 4: by the EDL and what the ADL had obtained. Police
Speaker 4: discovered the ADL possessed over ten thousand.
Speaker 2: Did it say, Cathine firesteign on that.
Speaker 4: One names of Americans and organizations, including six thousand from
Speaker 4: the political right. These included names from the San Francisco
Speaker 4: Police intelligence files, but also many names merged from the
Speaker 4: ADL's own lists illegally accessing the Department of Motor Vehicles database.
Speaker 4: The ADL to Officer Gerard and other cooperating police officers,
Speaker 4: had obtained one thousand, three hundred and ninety four driver's
Speaker 4: license members. Included was information from private citizens drivers' licenses,
Speaker 4: including their photos, license plate numbers, and vehicle registration members.
Speaker 4: From the law enforcement database or rap sheets, the ADL
Speaker 4: obtained confidential criminal histories, which included much information that couldn't
Speaker 4: be used for blackmail. The ADL also illegally obtained postal
Speaker 4: information on many Americans, including post office box numbers. In addition,
Speaker 4: they obtained confidential immigration information on unsuspecting Americans, plus detailed
Speaker 4: banking information and personal phone numbers.
Speaker 2: Please immigration information. Now with Mark Longo, the guy whose
Speaker 2: pet was Peanut that they murdered. Remember what he says
Speaker 2: about the dec questioning her, which isn't their jurisdiction. It
Speaker 2: isn't there, It isn't their business questioning his wife's immigration
Speaker 2: status like they know something ahead of time.
Speaker 1: Right, He's found many Americans had gotten into the ADL
Speaker 1: files simply because they had written to a right wing
Speaker 1: conservative organization requesting information. Book estimated his computerized right wing
Speaker 1: file contained the names of about six thousand people. Some
Speaker 1: are members of right wing organizations, Others may only have
Speaker 1: written to a right wing organization requesting information. In addition,
Speaker 1: Bullock's ADL file contained police surveillance photos of persons involved
Speaker 1: in public demonstrations. The list also included a person's affiliation
Speaker 1: with other groups.
Speaker 2: See it's okay to scream for baby killing. But as
Speaker 2: long as if you're saying stop that practice, stop that
Speaker 2: ritual sacrifice to your ungodly God, then then you're on.
Speaker 2: Then you're on the list, right because this is backward
Speaker 2: inverted orld, very frankist in nature. It's anti life or
Speaker 2: public meetings.
Speaker 1: They had attended. In the same way, Arab Americans who
Speaker 1: had written a letter to the editor critical of Israel
Speaker 1: were included, quoting police Inspector Roth. Any Arab American with
Speaker 1: anti Israel LeMans or any Arab American who wrote letters
Speaker 1: to the newspaper editors expressing anti Israel sentiments would be
Speaker 1: reflected in ADL LA files.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and his name was Roth. Surprise.
Speaker 4: Surprise, So determined was the ADL spy Roy Bullock to
Speaker 4: obtained detailed personal information on opponents that he would even
Speaker 4: search through their garbage. Police found intimate letters.
Speaker 3: Remember, Sandra Bullock is a Jew.
Speaker 2: This guy's last name was Bullock. Yeah, so their people
Speaker 2: are in place to do these things.
Speaker 4: Letters of the children of one such family, written to
Speaker 4: each other and carefully preserved by the ADL. They also
Speaker 4: discovered that, although Bullock had been an employee of the
Speaker 4: ADL since nineteen fifty four, the ADL had never paid
Speaker 4: withholding taxes on him or listed him as an employee. Instead,
Speaker 4: they financed his spy activities in cash. Ronald Roth, inspector
Speaker 4: from the San Francisco Police Department in charge of investigating
Speaker 4: this case, cites no less than forty eight probable state
Speaker 4: income tax felonies committed by the ADL over the five
Speaker 4: year period preceding his raid on ADL files. Roth cites
Speaker 4: the possibility of seventeen different kinds of violations of the
Speaker 4: Penal Code, which the ADL indulged in, three kinds of
Speaker 4: violation of government code, and one kind of violation of
Speaker 4: the California Vehicle Code. A critical witness concerning the ADL's
Speaker 4: inner workings was David Gerwitz, former factfinding librarian for the
Speaker 4: ADL office in Los Angeles, granted immunity from prosecution. Gerwitz
Speaker 4: admitted under FBI questioning that when he was an ADL employee,
Speaker 4: there was never any restriction against passing on confidential information
Speaker 4: to Israel. Such would not have been difficult, according to Gervitz,
Speaker 4: because staff of the Israeli Consulate regularly visited the Los
Speaker 4: Angeles ADL office, briefing ADL on affairs in Israel. Thus,
Speaker 4: there is every reason to believe that the Mosad, Israel's
Speaker 4: super efficient spy organization, now possesses every name illegally obtained
Speaker 4: by the ADL in San Francisco and elsewhere around the country.
Speaker 4: Yet such transfer of information to Israel is only to
Speaker 4: be expected of the ADL, For the ADL is the
Speaker 4: American based propaganda and intelligence division of the Mossade. The
Speaker 4: ADL spies on Americans in violation of the Foreign Agent's
Speaker 4: Registration Act of nineteen thirty eight as an unregistered and
Speaker 4: therefore illegal agent of the State of Israel, lobbying on
Speaker 4: behalf of Israel's interests. As a result of their theft
Speaker 4: of police files, the California ADL was subjected to investigation
Speaker 4: on numerous counts of criminal activity. However, after a year
Speaker 4: of ADL denials and legal wrangling. This national organization, with
Speaker 4: an annual budget of thirty two million dollars, was fined
Speaker 4: up paltry seventy five thousand dollars. To add insult to
Speaker 4: injury of the thousands of Americans whose privacy the ADL
Speaker 4: had invaded, The court decreed the ADL fine must be
Speaker 4: used to combat prejudice in America. Even so, the ADL
Speaker 4: continued to affirm its innocence. The ADL's National Director, Abe Foxman,
Speaker 4: maintained the same angelic exterior which has stood the ADL
Speaker 4: so well for so long.
Speaker 1: There's nothing we do that is sinister, and there's nothing
Speaker 1: we do that is against the law.
Speaker 4: Incredibly, although the ADL did suffer a public loss of
Speaker 4: credibility as a result of this scandal, the ADL's political
Speaker 4: clout and prestige has only increased since then. Under the
Speaker 4: ultraliberal leadership of Reno in the Justice Department, the ADL
Speaker 4: has been exalted to the position of the nation's teacher
Speaker 4: on how to end prejudice. It was relatively easy for
Speaker 4: the ADL to access confidential files of the San Francisco
Speaker 4: Police Department because most police departments and even the FBI
Speaker 4: often work in close collaboration with the adlce the FBI
Speaker 4: cannot legally keep a file on persons on account of
Speaker 4: their political activity, the FBI has come to the ADL
Speaker 4: for under the table information on persons or organizations of
Speaker 4: interest to them. Thus, the same information on innocent Americans
Speaker 4: which Bullock gave to the ADL, he also passed on
Speaker 4: not only to the FBI, but, according to his testimony,
Speaker 4: to the IRS, the ATF, and even the CIA. In fact,
Speaker 4: Bullock admitted he was a paid employee of the FBI
Speaker 4: and had daily phone conversations with law enforcement officers seeking
Speaker 4: information they could not legally obtain on their own. Such
Speaker 4: liaison continues to intensify because of FBI and Justice Department
Speaker 4: encouragement of ADL participation with them. As early as nineteen
Speaker 4: eighty five, every FBI field office was ordered by then
Speaker 4: Director William Sessions to establish a liaison and line of
Speaker 4: communication with the ADL. Similarly, the Justice Department has allowed
Speaker 4: the ADL an integral role in the creation and implementation
Speaker 4: of anti hate legislation in the US Justice departments. Hate
Speaker 4: Crimes Guidelines for Police Officers dated October twenty second two thousand.
Speaker 4: It describes the ADL in the following glowing terms.
Speaker 1: The Anti Defamation League ADL is a human relations organization
Speaker 1: dedicated to promoting intergroup cooperation and interfaith understanding. Over the
Speaker 1: past decade, the ADL has become a leading resource in
Speaker 1: crafting responses to hate violence, including model hate crime legislation,
Speaker 1: a seventeen minute hate crimes training video, a handbook of
Speaker 1: existing hate crime policies and procedures at both large and
Speaker 1: small police departments, and a general human relations program for
Speaker 1: law enforcement.
Speaker 4: Such government favoritism is confirmed in the ADL's November nineteen
Speaker 4: ninety one frontline newsletter. Quoted in New American View of
Speaker 4: May nineteen ninety.
Speaker 1: Two, The FBI has asked the ADL to play a
Speaker 1: leading role in its hate crimes training and outreach efforts. Further,
Speaker 1: the ADL is asked to provide input as hate crime
Speaker 1: training manuals and data collection are drafted. As a result,
Speaker 1: according to the ADL newsletter, ABL Washington representatives have participated
Speaker 1: in FBI sponsored regional hate crime training conferences for law
Speaker 1: enforcement officials from more than three hundred of the nation's
Speaker 1: largest cities and counties.
Speaker 4: The ADL now provides police with anti hate training manuals.
Speaker 4: In these, the ADL is given the privilege of defining
Speaker 4: what constitutes prejudice or crimes of prejudice. Further, the ADL
Speaker 4: is helping to determine punishment for a crime of prejudice.
Speaker 4: How severe should punishment for hate crimes be. Since the
Speaker 4: ADL considers any prejudice against Jews, Blacks, or gays to
Speaker 4: be very bad, they have convinced law enforcement, most state legislatures,
Speaker 4: the Justice Department, and even Congress that hate crimes deserve
Speaker 4: a much stiffer sentence than ordinary crimes of violence. Worse yet,
Speaker 4: the ADL is grooming law enforcement in the United States
Speaker 4: to become its private gestapo. David Gervitz, the ADL's former
Speaker 4: librarian in Los Angeles, frankly told FBI investigators that the
Speaker 4: ADL seeks to curry favor with police. If the police
Speaker 4: prove cooperative, especially if they provide privileged information, they are
Speaker 4: often rewarded with all expenses paid trips to Israel.
Speaker 1: According to San Francisco police investigator Roth, Grvitz was aware
Speaker 1: that periodically the ADL sponsors and pays all expenses for
Speaker 1: trips to Israel. For police officers as a way of
Speaker 1: developing liaison with them and expressing gratitude for their assistance.
Speaker 3: In the same way, Whose country is this again?
Speaker 2: Ours? You sure about that?
Speaker 1: According to Roth, In May of nineteen ninety one, Detective
Speaker 1: Carol of the San Diego Sheriff's Office Special Investigation Unit,
Speaker 1: Tom Girard, and nine other law enforcement officers went on
Speaker 1: an ADL sponsored trip to Israel. Detective Carol said that
Speaker 1: this all expense paid trip was more or less thank
Speaker 1: you gift and the liaison gesture by the ad L
Speaker 1: to continue the close relationship it has with specific law
Speaker 1: enforcement officers in the United States.
Speaker 2: Now there's something about Israel cursed soil. I don't know
Speaker 2: what it is, but there are a lot of examples
Speaker 2: of people going there and having really messed up experiences
Speaker 2: that alter their brains and cause problems or change them
Speaker 2: in certain ways. I don't know what it is. But
Speaker 2: Ammin had that very strange thing happened to him where
Speaker 2: people were telling him that he was going to you know,
Speaker 2: lead a certain basic you know, he was going to
Speaker 2: do certain things, and they were like speaking, shot up
Speaker 2: out of bed and just started babbling and went insane
Speaker 2: while they were telling Ann in this and that happened
Speaker 2: two nights in a row. Wen he was on that dig, right,
Speaker 2: That's how he puts it. There's also the inspiration, and
Speaker 2: I think this might have I don't know if this
Speaker 2: was a positive or negative. It definitely wasn't you know.
Speaker 2: Vernon Howell, who was an introvert all of a sudden
Speaker 2: became the main pastor of the Davidians after his trip
Speaker 2: to Israel where something awakened within him. So I don't
Speaker 2: think that that was a negative thing in that particular instance.
Speaker 2: But that's another example. And then you also have Alynn
Speaker 2: and Ted being tormented, tortured and chased by something they
Speaker 2: could not see, some sort of dark entity presence, some
Speaker 2: sort of hex or curse that was placed upon them
Speaker 2: that troubled and even worse. And this is kind of
Speaker 2: an interesting thing because they spoke out against this stuff,
Speaker 2: and it's very possible that they use some sort of
Speaker 2: sorcery on them. Because Anne had a brain tumor, and
Speaker 2: then she had all kinds of other things going on.
Speaker 2: Some things could be perceived and seen by others, others couldn't,
Speaker 2: and she could speak in different languages that she never
Speaker 2: learned she could, you know, see things in the sky,
Speaker 2: and you know, things would happen, things would be moved
Speaker 2: and changed. In their house, things would disappear and reappear.
Speaker 2: So there's something to that. It's just I don't know
Speaker 2: where to place that, but there's something to that.
Speaker 4: Yet, the ADL wants to provide American police with more
Speaker 4: than just rest and recreation in Israel. It wants to
Speaker 4: re educate American law enforcement officers in Israel, sending them
Speaker 4: home as the forerunners of the new thought police in America.
Speaker 4: May nineteen ninety two issue. The New American View continues
Speaker 4: to describe the DL takeover of the US law enforcement
Speaker 4: establishment last.
Speaker 1: Month that Jerusalem.
Speaker 2: In other words, when things go down here, don't run
Speaker 2: to the wrong people for assistance, because you will not
Speaker 2: find it.
Speaker 1: Post reported that a delegation of New Jersey's state police
Speaker 1: and prosecutors, led by Assistant Attorney James Mulverhill, had completed
Speaker 1: over two weeks of training by Israel's elite anti terrorist
Speaker 1: units and had established permanent lines of collaboration with them.
Speaker 1: The New Jersey delegation was the latest of at least
Speaker 1: a half dozen such junckets to Israel for American police
Speaker 1: departments all set up and paid for by the ADL
Speaker 1: since nineteen eighty.
Speaker 4: This article continues to describe how American law enforcement is
Speaker 4: now looking to the ADL and Israel for guidance and
Speaker 4: how to enforce the ADL hate crime agenda and it's
Speaker 4: April nineteen ninety bulletin the ADL boasted that the International
Speaker 4: Association of Chiefs of Police held its annual meeting in Jerusalem.
Speaker 2: Well, what about the Fratunal Order of Police Officers? How's
Speaker 2: that not tied to freemasonry and maybe even more specifically,
Speaker 2: to beIN a birth You never know.
Speaker 4: Jerusalem Post said that this was the first time in
Speaker 4: its one hundred year history that the session was convened
Speaker 4: outside of America, although the ADL trips to Israel we
Speaker 4: have referred to occurred throughout the eighties.
Speaker 2: And does that trouble anybody else that our police officers
Speaker 2: are being trained by these people, being brought to what
Speaker 2: we consider a foreign and completely unlike US nation country
Speaker 2: terrorist state to be trained on how to be more
Speaker 2: brutal because that's how they are to their inhabitants. Isn't
Speaker 2: that something? Because we're not Israel before Israel is Israel I.
Speaker 2: Keep on driving this point home because I hope it's
Speaker 2: clear now where we live and that this thing that's
Speaker 2: happening today isn't going to change anything. It's going to
Speaker 2: be horrible one way or the other.
Speaker 4: In early nineties, the ADL has never admitted anything improper
Speaker 4: by such favors to American police, neither has it promised
Speaker 4: not to repeat such trips in the future. In fact,
Speaker 4: the Washington Post of October nineteenth, nineteen ninety three says
Speaker 4: the ADL views that special police missions to Israel as
Speaker 4: another intensive training activity, giving officers a chance to meet
Speaker 4: top Israeli police, intelligence officers and political leaders.
Speaker 3: So missid an idea.
Speaker 1: If the.
Speaker 2: Whoopsie hold on h then I go too far this
Speaker 2: time I've gone to why is it?
Speaker 1: Ah?
Speaker 2: It's not let me try it to a good spot.
Speaker 2: That's lame. Ah, all right, whatever, I guess. I just
Speaker 2: that's lame. How long is that going to be? It
Speaker 2: just jumps ahead? These little bars at the bottom suck?
Speaker 2: Part two? Canada, Chinada.
Speaker 1: Where is this union between the a d L and
Speaker 1: US law enforcement taking us to help? There? Is that
Speaker 1: the ad L wants America to catch up with Canada,
Speaker 1: which is dominated by anti hate laws. The a d
Speaker 1: L wants American Christianity intimidated in the same way Canadian
Speaker 1: Christians are in British Columbia. Why is Christianity in Canada
Speaker 1: so vulnerable to anti hate laws? To find out, we
Speaker 1: must take a closer look at the history and structure
Speaker 1: of Canada's group libel statutes.
Speaker 4: Although Canadians, like Americans, have always treasured freedom, in nineteen
Speaker 4: seventy one, the Canadian Parliament, with many members absent and
Speaker 4: by a Slim majority, created Canada's anti hate law. Section
Speaker 4: three nineteen of Canada's Human Rights Act states that it
Speaker 4: is now a crime to publicly incite hatred against an
Speaker 4: identifiable group. Section three nineteen limited identifiable groups by color, race, religion,
Speaker 4: or ethnic origin. Sexual orientation was not included. What does
Speaker 4: it mean to incite hatred against such groups? Section three
Speaker 4: nineteen stipulates that criticism of a group is criminal only
Speaker 4: if a person willfully promotes hatred, and who decides whether
Speaker 4: a person really intended to incite hatred. When the Canadian
Speaker 4: government outlawed hurtful speech, a new type of court system
Speaker 4: was created whose purpose was to delve into the inner
Speaker 4: motives of the accused. In each province, a special human
Speaker 4: rights tribunal determines if words and actions are sufficiently malicious
Speaker 4: to warrant prosecution under section three nineteen. If they are,
Speaker 4: the accused can be found guilty, find and serve a
Speaker 4: prison term of up to two years. If, however, there
Speaker 4: is no conviction at the local level, provincial police confidently
Speaker 4: refer cases to the federal tribunal in Ottawa. I was
Speaker 4: told by BC police that the federal tribunal probes much
Speaker 4: more deeply into questions of motivation and usually convicts. In addition,
Speaker 4: police in BC have recourse to an advanced provincial hate
Speaker 4: law more extreme than any in Canada. The BC Human
Speaker 4: Rights Act, passed in nineteen ninety three forbids publishing anything
Speaker 4: that is quote likely to expose a person, or a
Speaker 4: group or a class of persons to hatred or contempt,
Speaker 4: although violation.
Speaker 2: Of so that means if noive kind of like the
Speaker 2: guy who I'm surprised they didn't put this whole Frankel
Speaker 2: story into the birthing of the ADL. They just said
Speaker 2: Benaedreth did it. It was because a factory owner raped
Speaker 2: and murdered a seven year old girl and he was
Speaker 2: going to get off light and the people, the townspeople
Speaker 2: wouldn't have that, so they dragged him out and hunged him,
Speaker 2: exacted the proper justice that was necessary for a crime
Speaker 2: like that. So that's why the ideal started, because they
Speaker 2: were not going to have another one of those can't
Speaker 2: have the oavase getting harmed for their child killing. So
Speaker 2: this means, this means that if you even just report
Speaker 2: on technically, if you just even report on, and that's
Speaker 2: why there's probably a lot of black atomics. They don't
Speaker 2: want anybody to understand how rampant this is, with you know,
Speaker 2: a million children being disappeared every year and that's probably
Speaker 2: even a modest amount in this country that even in
Speaker 2: just talking about it couldn't say obviously, if you're a
Speaker 2: normal person discussed frustration, anger, and you know, is it
Speaker 2: hater or is it just the desire for justice for
Speaker 2: somebody who was victimized by that type of horrific crime,
Speaker 2: an innocent person, an innocent child. But if you talk
Speaker 2: about it technically, you're falling under the category of someone
Speaker 2: who's inciting hatred and inciting violence against someone else. What
Speaker 2: happens to the to the well, then rightly so argument,
Speaker 2: And why why would we cover up the deeds of
Speaker 2: people like that? Why are they special? Why are they better?
Speaker 2: Because they're typically the same breed and stock who do
Speaker 2: these things, and they even if they aren't, they sure
Speaker 2: as hell do for their rituals and stuff like that.
Speaker 2: So and I'm not just talking about preachcraft style old
Speaker 2: black magic Babylonian shit, but I mean that is type
Speaker 2: of that is that is a that is an element
Speaker 2: of this judaic shit. But they do this stuff, Simon
Speaker 2: and Trent is just one of them as a reference.
Speaker 2: There's plenty more, more more, and we went into the
Speaker 2: details of a lot of those when we were reading
Speaker 2: through the New History of the Jews by Eusless Mullens,
Speaker 2: of cover up in the amount of times that innocent
Speaker 2: children are murdered, and that it's supposed to be a
Speaker 2: rabbinical right to do so, reserved for the rabbis, but
Speaker 2: others will try to do it as well, So they
Speaker 2: have to put a cap on it. They have to
Speaker 2: put a put a hush on it so that it
Speaker 2: doesn't get out, because clumsier people who do this and
Speaker 2: get caught will put a you know, bad light and
Speaker 2: expose the rest of them.
Speaker 3: So they of course on the media.
Speaker 2: Do you own the owned the police departments as you see,
Speaker 2: even the prosecutors then the own the uh the judges,
Speaker 2: the own the judicial system. Hell, they own the country.
Speaker 2: So we don't see a lot of We don't see
Speaker 2: as much of that element as we should be seeing
Speaker 2: if we weren't already controlled by our you know whatever.
Speaker 2: Our perception of this world is being stipulated by others
Speaker 2: who are only feeding us what they want us to see. So,
Speaker 2: children being murdered, you talk about it, technically, that's inciting
Speaker 2: violence upon someone i e. The the predator. But that's
Speaker 2: a bad thing. How How is that a bad thing?
Speaker 2: How do you deter that behavior? If you can't scrutinize it,
Speaker 2: if you can't argue against that type of behavior, how
Speaker 2: do you correct it? Even if it's just a matter
Speaker 2: of scaring people. Because of the consequences of such an action,
Speaker 2: you know, you can't change maybe not maybe not change
Speaker 2: their their their impulses or tendencies, but maybe their will
Speaker 2: or there or they're.
Speaker 3: You know, to carry it out all the way to
Speaker 3: actually do it.
Speaker 2: They may harbor those feelings, but not actually do it
Speaker 2: if they know that the repercussions would be so severe.
Speaker 2: But they don't have that happening. They don't have they
Speaker 2: don't have accountability, they don't have responsibility for their actions.
Speaker 2: They don't have any anything because of who controls the system.
Speaker 4: This act does not create a criminal record, it can
Speaker 4: embroil publishers and writers in fines and huge court costs.
Speaker 4: Doug Collins was a popular columnist for the BC north
Speaker 4: Shore News. He incurred several hundred thousand dollars in legal
Speaker 4: fees and a two thousand dollars fine, primarily because he
Speaker 4: questioned in print the accuracy of the six million figure
Speaker 4: of a holocaust. The north Shore News is now forbidden
Speaker 4: to publish his work. Yet more powerful legal tools may
Speaker 4: soon be coming to the aid of provincial police. Police
Speaker 4: told me broader, stiffer legislation is imminently expected to come
Speaker 4: down from Ottawa. Such will greatly empower provincial police to
Speaker 4: prosecute persons charged with hate crimes. We should be aware
Speaker 4: that Benigh Breath Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress were
Speaker 4: never really satisfied with the federal Hate Statute Section three nineteen.
Speaker 4: Since it became law in nineteen seventy one, they have
Speaker 4: pressured the government that it be toughened and expanded. In response.
Speaker 4: In nineteen ninety five, the Attorney General of Ontario, in
Speaker 4: a speech to the Canadian Jewish Congress, reported that the
Speaker 4: Ontario provincial government is pressuring the federal government in Ottawa
Speaker 4: to one make membership and hate organizations a crime, two
Speaker 4: expand what is considered an identifiable group under the law,
Speaker 4: and three eliminate the defense of truth for those charged
Speaker 4: with hate crimes. In an article in the Canadian Jewish News,
Speaker 4: then I Breath Canada supports the Attorney General of Ontario
Speaker 4: and is reported as saying that not only should denial
Speaker 4: of the Holocaust become a crime, but hate bongers should
Speaker 4: no longer be allowed to use is the defense of
Speaker 4: truth in court.
Speaker 3: The defense of truth.
Speaker 2: So there, with that statement alone, you can't deny something
Speaker 2: that didn't happen, and you can prove didn't happen, and
Speaker 2: the defensive truth about that is not is and hate bongers.
Speaker 2: So how do they hate bongers if what they're talking
Speaker 2: about isn't real, didn't happen. Where they hate mongering on
Speaker 2: should not be able to use the defensive truth. Do
Speaker 2: you understand how ridiculous that statement is. Defensive truth is
Speaker 2: not allowed. You can't defend it by telling the truth.
Speaker 2: Now do you see how history books are written and
Speaker 2: why they're written that way, and why there's so few
Speaker 2: people talking about the truth. And I see this wave
Speaker 2: of popular people talking about you know, people who get
Speaker 2: on bigger shows and discuss this stuff as not being
Speaker 2: who you think they are, or maybe you do know
Speaker 2: who they are, that their plants that they're just here
Speaker 2: to egg on other people so that they start talking
Speaker 2: voicing their opinions. Because of course, remember when you do
Speaker 2: that on social media, you're being added to the list.
Speaker 2: So there's a reason for that, there's a reason for
Speaker 2: to entice people to look at this and get angry
Speaker 2: so that they can build their lists even thicker. Right,
Speaker 2: then they can inspire certain things and have a whole
Speaker 2: big show about how this is getting out of control,
Speaker 2: and look at all this hatred towards the blah blah blahs,
Speaker 2: towards the aevase, towards the blast, towards this, towards that.
Speaker 2: And then of course there's the problem that people react to,
Speaker 2: oh my goodness, I can't believe this, and then they'll
Speaker 2: provide the solution from a problem that they created themselves
Speaker 2: through opposition, that they created themselves simply because people tell
Speaker 2: the truth.
Speaker 3: Interesting, what is.
Speaker 4: This tough new legislation which police in Calgary and Vancouver
Speaker 4: are eagerly anticipating. The Police Hate Crimes Unit in Toronto
Speaker 4: gave me the answer. Their spokesperson told me that at present,
Speaker 4: no new legislation is actually before Parliament. However, in the
Speaker 4: last several years, there has been a flurry of conferences
Speaker 4: and proposals on how to toughen Canada's anti hate law.
Speaker 2: It's called lobbying. It's called having their people already in
Speaker 2: government so they can ignore laws. They don't need to
Speaker 2: create new ones. They can just make shit up as
Speaker 2: they go along.
Speaker 4: I was told that Benig Barrith Canada has recently sponsored
Speaker 4: a very large international conference representatives from police hate units
Speaker 4: from all over Europe.
Speaker 2: Why do police have a hate unit in the first place?
Speaker 2: What the hell is that? What does that even fucking mean?
Speaker 2: It's somebody else's arbitrary statement of intent of your intent? Really,
Speaker 2: people get frustrated, invent a lot. They may say things
Speaker 2: that it's sound good at the time to make themselves
Speaker 2: calm down, and yet you could you're gonna use that
Speaker 2: against them, you know, when you when you constantly offend
Speaker 2: the sensibilities of people over and over and over again,
Speaker 2: repeatedly all day long. Of course, eventually there's gonna be
Speaker 2: a threshold, and then they're going to reach that threshold,
Speaker 2: and then they're going to start thinking things that they
Speaker 2: never wouldn't have thought before because you push them over
Speaker 2: the edge. And then they'll say, hey, this is jacked up,
Speaker 2: and this is such a big problem and it's so
Speaker 2: rampant that we need to do something drastic about it.
Speaker 2: If that means cutting them out of you know, government,
Speaker 2: which I totally am for, uh, cutting them out of
Speaker 2: utilizing or you know, dictating how money is created, I'm
Speaker 2: off for that too. See how many problems go away
Speaker 2: if that happens. Of course, there would be a war
Speaker 2: here because the banks aren't going to let go. But
Speaker 2: it's war. It's a war worth fighting. If that was
Speaker 2: the case, of course, you would have to understand that
Speaker 2: the military win. At the inner side.
Speaker 4: Europe came to Canada, their purpose was to assist an
Speaker 4: I Breth in making Canada's anti hate statutes as advanced
Speaker 4: as Europe's. This police representative said that police from Germany
Speaker 4: were prominent participants in the Benig Bareth conference. You should
Speaker 4: be aware that in Germany, if anyone, including American citizens,
Speaker 4: are even overheard in private conversation questioning the accuracy of
Speaker 4: the six million figure, they can be harshly fined and imprisoned.
Speaker 2: And how do they know if it was a private conversation,
Speaker 2: if didn't have their spies every freaking ware posing as
Speaker 2: your friends.
Speaker 4: Yet this Toronto hate crime special was.
Speaker 2: Told were better. Yet you had your phone in your
Speaker 2: pocket and your phone ratted you out.
Speaker 4: Told me Baniba Writh is uneasy about taking Canada's hate
Speaker 4: law too far too soon, Althhole ban ib Wreth is
Speaker 4: eager to protect homosexuals under section three nineteen.
Speaker 2: If you ever get together as a group to discuss
Speaker 2: anything anywhere, leave that stupid device at your house. Do
Speaker 2: not bring it with you.
Speaker 4: Fear's a backlash which could actually repeal Canada's hate law altogether.
Speaker 4: This Toronto police authority also made several references to a
Speaker 4: proposal in late nineteen ninety eight by Canada's ten provincial
Speaker 4: attorney generals and the Canadian Solicitor General. This proposal would
Speaker 4: one criminalize all so called hate literature that is meant
Speaker 4: for distribution. Two allow police to seize computer hard drives
Speaker 4: which contain a lie hate material. Three make truth no
Speaker 4: longer eighty offense for Holocaust revisionists. Four include homosexuals as
Speaker 4: a protected group.
Speaker 2: Hold up right there, who's the revisionists? I've made this
Speaker 2: point before, but let's make it again. Who's the revisionist?
Speaker 2: The person who altered history, well, the person who corrects it,
Speaker 2: who's revising it. It's inverted to say that they're revisionists
Speaker 2: into label another label, so that you can categorize people.
Speaker 2: They're revisionists because somehow the official statement is valid. Right,
Speaker 2: that's the assumption being made here. Incorrect, incorrect assumption. The
Speaker 2: truth is the truth, regardless of who says it and
Speaker 2: who doesn't say it. So there's only one truth, there's
Speaker 2: only one reality, and regardless of what people want it
Speaker 2: to be doesn't matter. It's not the point. So it
Speaker 2: doesn't matter. If enough people have agreed upon something to
Speaker 2: be true doesn't make it more true. So to say
Speaker 2: that this is revisionist history, to correct the lie or
Speaker 2: the misunderstanding or the belief in a lie about something
Speaker 2: that didn't happen or whatever. That's not revisionists.
Speaker 3: That's reality.
Speaker 2: Reality is not revisionist.
Speaker 4: Group. Under Section three nineteen, proposals such as this have
Speaker 4: not yet been placed before Parliament yet. If they are,
Speaker 4: and our past police can immediately prosecute anyone who publicly
Speaker 4: criticizes the homosexual lifestyle or distributes literature that does. This
Speaker 4: means the collision of Canadian law and Christianity. Wow, the
Speaker 4: true Christian never threatens physical harm to anyone. The Christian's
Speaker 4: duty is very much to alienate people, not only from homosexuality,
Speaker 4: but from abortion, pornography, witchcraft, child molestation, and so on.
Speaker 4: This means that if the Canadian.
Speaker 2: I got something to add to that whole, the witch
Speaker 2: trials were you know, false accusations and stuff like that.
Speaker 2: There may have been some of that going on, but
Speaker 2: I don't think that was the full of it. Because
Speaker 2: when you really look at and they've said they've stated
Speaker 2: this themselves. So it's kind of like a reveal that
Speaker 2: all monster movies are antisemitic because it's depicting Jews as
Speaker 2: these or well, look at the noses on a witch. Hm,
Speaker 2: who is who created the the monster?
Speaker 3: A Frankenstein?
Speaker 2: Right? I wonder what his nationality was? Probably not Irish?
Speaker 2: You get my meaning here? Yeah, So expressing things in
Speaker 2: different ways to say, hey, watch out for these people.
Speaker 2: They're sorcerers, they still children, they eat them, hands on, gretel,
Speaker 2: you know, all that stuff, and they're yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: they are depicting them because that's what they do. So
Speaker 2: how many witches were actually innocent? Probably a lot less
Speaker 2: than you think. Probably a lot less than you think.
Speaker 4: In federal code soon includes protection of homosexuality from criticism.
Speaker 4: Public opposition to that identifiable group will become a hate crime.
Speaker 4: Anti hate laws are thus anti Christian laws. They are
Speaker 4: a demonically clever scheme to intimidate and eventually silence Christianity.
Speaker 4: Spot in section three nineteen of the federal law has
Speaker 4: been the provision that if what the accused alleges is true,
Speaker 4: he cannot be found guilty of a verbal hate crime.
Speaker 4: Yet police and the anti hate units of both Vancouver,
Speaker 4: BC and Calgary, Alberta told me that for practical purposes,
Speaker 4: they do not consider truth to be a defense for
Speaker 4: one charged with the crime of hurtful speech.
Speaker 2: So I just want to pause here. I used to
Speaker 2: live in Oregon in Washington when I was in the Coastguard,
Speaker 2: and it is beautiful. These are beautiful states. I mean
Speaker 2: just looking back there with the water and stuff like that.
Speaker 2: But that is the overcast of every single day practically.
Speaker 2: So it's probably like one o'clock in the afternoon and
Speaker 2: that's about as bright as it's going to get the
Speaker 2: whole day. It's it's always it always rainy. That's why
Speaker 2: it's considered a nontropical rainforest. In most of those areas
Speaker 2: around the Columbia River and branching outward, there's a ferns.
Speaker 2: It takes a lot of it takes a lotful lot
Speaker 2: of moysture for ferns to grow. So anyhow, he goes
Speaker 2: over to the defense of truth again, which obviously is
Speaker 2: absolutely insane in an insane world.
Speaker 4: Rather, police will do their best to prove in court
Speaker 4: that the person charged did intend to damage the feelings
Speaker 4: or reputation.
Speaker 2: How do you prove intent? That's mind reading, right, That's
Speaker 2: like saying, remember what Bill said, might be thinking, might
Speaker 2: be thinking, might be thinking. He said it like Thatations.
Speaker 4: Of members of an identifiable group. Proof of such intention
Speaker 4: to Kurt means conviction. Truth does not matter with such
Speaker 4: a motivationally.
Speaker 2: So there's no defense. So there's a kangaroo court much
Speaker 2: like Nurremberg, where truth doesn't matter. We're angry and we're
Speaker 2: the EVAs and we're gonna get blood because that's what
Speaker 2: we crave.
Speaker 3: Period.
Speaker 2: Yet, so if you're if you're singled out, there's only
Speaker 2: one outcome.
Speaker 3: Isn't that lovely? Now, that's that's not even.
Speaker 2: We're supposed to being a constitutional republic with a you know,
Speaker 2: common law, but that's not obviously, that's a fairy tale.
Speaker 2: That's not even. But that's not even democracy. That's a
Speaker 2: totalitarian dictatorship of communism. That's what that is. And that's
Speaker 2: already here and Canada obviously.
Speaker 1: Based just a system in place. Canada's new anti hate
Speaker 1: tribunals have during the last decade lost little time in
Speaker 1: finding victims. Yet Canadian thought police did not begin by
Speaker 1: going after persons whom society would rally to support. Rather,
Speaker 1: they indicted those least in public favor and who are they?
Speaker 1: Holocaust revisionists, those who question whether a full six million
Speaker 1: Jews were killed by Nazis. During World War.
Speaker 2: They were called national socialists Nazis derogatory. It's not okay
Speaker 2: to say that anymore. We should educate ourselves and stop
Speaker 2: doing that, okay. And who is bulldozing of them all
Speaker 2: into the grave? And where did they come from? And
Speaker 2: how do we know those aren't Germans? After they reopened
Speaker 2: the camps, probably know they're not pushing that off the rhine?
Speaker 2: Ah yeah, right? And who did they actually tattoo because
Speaker 2: a lot of those tattoos didn't didn't check out when
Speaker 2: they were looking into the books, right, talk about gambling
Speaker 2: to try to make some money and capitalize on the
Speaker 2: situation and losing and still having to have that stupid
Speaker 2: thing on your arm and the rest of your life.
Speaker 3: Haha.
Speaker 2: But also, I mean, look at this. They were starving.
Speaker 2: Everybody was dying of illness. They were bombed. They didn't
Speaker 2: have ability to bring food to these places, let alone
Speaker 2: even feed their troops or feed their people in the country.
Speaker 2: Who do you think was top priority of the people
Speaker 2: in the work camps? So people were already diseased. The
Speaker 2: Red Cross came in there and gave people of vaccines,
Speaker 2: making exacerbating the situation, making more illness, But it's Germany's fault.
Speaker 2: You know, they did execute people, the executed communists, the
Speaker 2: executed subversive Bolsheviks, people already guilty of crimes of subversion
Speaker 2: and terrorism, rightly so. And if those acts are what
Speaker 2: they were condemned by, then it's because those are condemnable acts,
Speaker 2: not because of what they were, but because of what
Speaker 2: they were doing.
Speaker 1: Or Two, we should understand that virtually all Holocaust revisionists
Speaker 1: agree that Hitler they had persecuted and even killed men.
Speaker 2: Well, then the revisionists are wrong too. Now they are
Speaker 2: revising history because they are continuing with the lie. If
Speaker 2: that's the case, like David Cole had half the story right, Ercidundel,
Speaker 2: I don't think was, I mean one hundred percent in
Speaker 2: agreement with David Cole. I think it's time for people
Speaker 2: to stop hating themselves in their history and their heritage
Speaker 2: over something that was a scam in the first place. Everything.
Speaker 2: They don't know how to tell the truth about anything.
Speaker 2: What makes you think they told the truth about that?
Speaker 2: What makes you think they told the truth about the
Speaker 2: books that they wrote for you to follow it religiously?
Speaker 1: Any Jews? Yet revisionists usually put the numbers of Jews
Speaker 1: deliberately killed by the Nazis in the hundreds of thousands,
Speaker 1: not millions they contend. The evidence shows much greater numbers
Speaker 1: of Jews were killed as a result of war, famine,
Speaker 1: and epidemics in internment camps than as a result of
Speaker 1: deliberate murder. Yet the figure of six million is a
Speaker 1: virtual article of faith for Bnigborith Canada and the Canadian
Speaker 1: Jewish con.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and it's also a cabalistic number because of a
Speaker 2: type typing has in letters. When they repeat the letters,
Speaker 2: they leave out one and they say so that they're
Speaker 2: saying okay, So this happens less six million, and that's
Speaker 2: where they come up with that through their mystical interpretation.
Speaker 1: Ungress. As a result, those organizations have relentlessly pressured the
Speaker 1: Canadian human rights tribunals to prosecute revisionists for publicly questioning
Speaker 1: the six million figure. Usually revisionists have lost in core
Speaker 1: and by losing precedent has been established in Canadian law.
Speaker 2: It's the hardest thing to do. But somehow the Germans
Speaker 2: pulled this off, to have done all that alleged killing,
Speaker 2: and yet they're in Europe. There were more of them
Speaker 2: after the war than there were before, not by a lot,
Speaker 2: but the number barely budged and it was actually increased.
Speaker 1: Interesting, huh that questioning the six million figure is definitely
Speaker 1: a violation of Section three nineteen, a hateful and hurtful act.
Speaker 1: With criminal convictions of those who doubt the six million figure,
Speaker 1: comes chilling possibilities that Christians are also in violation of
Speaker 1: the Federal Code. Surely, questioning numbers in the Holocaust is
Speaker 1: not as bad as describing another identifiable group, homosexuals, as
Speaker 1: evil and perverted. Yet that is exactly what the Bible
Speaker 1: instructs Christians to believe and teach concerning sodomy and those
Speaker 1: who practice it. As one of many biblical examples, Leviticus
Speaker 1: eighteen twenty two says you shall not lie with a
Speaker 1: male as one lies with a female. It is an abomination.
Speaker 4: Are Christians, by their fundamental anti gay stance, now in
Speaker 4: violation of Canada's anti hate laws? I asked that question
Speaker 4: to the Federal Police Authority in Ottawa, Sergeant Murray Knowles.
Speaker 4: He told me that since homos.
Speaker 3: And you put handcuffs on you just for asking, no,
Speaker 3: it's kidding.
Speaker 4: Sexuals are not as yet included in Section three nineteen's
Speaker 4: definition of a federally protected group. Christians can still criticize homosexuality.
Speaker 4: But I got a different story when I talked to
Speaker 4: the head of the anti hate unit in Calgary, Alberta.
Speaker 4: He clearly considered anti homosexual speech to be hateful and
Speaker 4: hurtful and would do his to see it prosecuted. If
Speaker 4: gays are not specifically protected under the federal law, how
Speaker 4: can such provincial police make anti homosexual speech a hate crime.
Speaker 4: In British Columbia, the police anti hate spokesperson told me
Speaker 4: that if someone were verbally humiliating homosexuals, the police would
Speaker 4: try first to convict that person on harassment charges. Once convicted,
Speaker 4: another federal statute, Section seven eighteen point two, passed by
Speaker 4: Ottawa in nineteen ninety six, would kick in. It allows
Speaker 4: police to define such anti gay harassment as a hate crime.
Speaker 4: Section seven eighteen point two makes intention to intimidate an
Speaker 4: aggravating circumstance, which boosts the penalty for such a bias crime.
Speaker 4: Section seven eighteen point two also protects victims of bias
Speaker 4: motivated crimes, such as homosexuals, under the full benefit of
Speaker 4: the federal hate law. Section three nineteen. These include stiffer
Speaker 4: fines and more jail time than if such harassment had
Speaker 4: not been motivated by a desire to humiliate. One of
Speaker 4: the reasons it was so easy to make Holocaust revisionism
Speaker 4: of thought crime in Canada was because the feelings of
Speaker 4: a clearly identifiable group under section three nineteen, the Jews
Speaker 4: were hurt. Yet there is much in the teachings of
Speaker 4: a New Testament which the Jews over the centuries have
Speaker 4: considered much more hurtful than denying the numbers of the Holocaust.
Speaker 4: For the past two thousand years, most Jews have bitterly
Speaker 4: resented the charge that the Jewish nation killed Jesus Christ.
Speaker 4: This was called the anti Semitic blood charge. Was it true?
Speaker 4: Listen to how in the Book of Acts the Apostles
Speaker 4: heaped blame upon that idea and the fiable group, the
Speaker 4: people of Israel and their religious leaders.
Speaker 1: Men of Israel, Listen to these words, Jesus the Nazarene,
Speaker 1: you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless
Speaker 1: men and put him to death. Therefore, let all the
Speaker 1: house of Israel know for certain that God has made
Speaker 1: him both Lord and Christ. This Jesus whom ye crucified,
Speaker 1: but you disown the Holy and the Righteous One, and
Speaker 1: asked for a murderer to be granted to you, but
Speaker 1: put to death the Prince of life by the name
Speaker 1: of Jesus Christ, the Nazarene, whom ye crucified. This man
Speaker 1: stands before you in good health.
Speaker 4: Such are only a few of the New Testament references
Speaker 4: inditing the Jewish nation and their leaders for the crucifixion.
Speaker 4: It is largely because of such so called anti sematism
Speaker 4: in the New Testament that Judaism has regarded a literal
Speaker 4: New Testament Christianity as a breeding ground for hatred and
Speaker 4: persecution of Jews, hatred that eventually led to the Holocaust.
Speaker 4: One provision of the present Canadian hate law is that
Speaker 4: it allows people to criticize others out of sincere religious motives. Yet,
Speaker 4: if a Canadian pastor, knowing full well the sensitivity of
Speaker 4: the Jews, teaches this biblical truth from the pulpit, he's
Speaker 4: in danger. There's no question he would be wide open
Speaker 4: to the charge of willfully inciting hatred under section three nineteen.
Speaker 4: He would not be able to defend his teaching as
Speaker 4: honest religious conviction. Rather the Jews would argue, re exposing
Speaker 4: their people to the blood charge, which led to the
Speaker 4: extinction of six million Jews, could only be viewed as
Speaker 4: a wilful attempt to incite hatred sex could lead to
Speaker 4: renewed persecution of an historically oppressed route. Christians in Canada
Speaker 4: know that simply.
Speaker 2: Questions historically oppressed or historically offensive, subversive, murderous, treacherous. I mean,
Speaker 2: do people go to single them out, the people even
Speaker 2: understand what Judaeanism is to be anti judaic, or do
Speaker 2: they go because based off of their you know, their
Speaker 2: offensive nature. There there are there there their response to
Speaker 2: this murderous, treacherous organization destroying their communities. Sorry, I stumbled
Speaker 2: there for a second. I'm little preoccupied with thought here. Well, uh,
Speaker 2: there's a there's twelve minutes left here. Let let's just
Speaker 2: finish this out. This show does not I'd be on
Speaker 2: here for three four hours if I put the other
Speaker 2: two on today. So I guess we're going to have
Speaker 2: to continue this some other time with the other two.
Speaker 2: But I will replay the ones called an Holy Alliance
Speaker 2: Zionism and Christianity, and the other Israel. Maybe we'll do
Speaker 2: a little tiny bit of that before we leave.
Speaker 4: Opening the extent of the Holocaust has earned Canadian revisionists
Speaker 4: huge fines, years of courtroom battles and appeals, a sentence
Speaker 4: of a year and a half in prison, and even
Speaker 4: loss of Canadian citizenship. With that in mind, is any
Speaker 4: pastor in Canada going to preach with conviction what the
Speaker 4: New Testament teaches concerning the Jewish role and the Crucifixion.
Speaker 4: To get the final answer, I again inquired of Sergeant
Speaker 4: Murray Knowles in Ottawa. He said that under Section three nineteen,
Speaker 4: Christians do have the right to express sincere religious criticisms
Speaker 4: of other identifiable groups. Get in reality, seeing how anti
Speaker 4: hate law is presently evolving into courts and taking into
Speaker 4: consideration the shadow cast by previous convictions, no Christian is
Speaker 4: likely to stick up his head and become the government's
Speaker 4: next test case. No one wants to help determine how
Speaker 4: far group libel laws can be stretched. I asked the
Speaker 4: Canadian Christian if believers in Canada are alarmed over such intimidation.
Speaker 4: When you live up here for a while, he said,
Speaker 4: you begin to sense when you are in danger of
Speaker 4: criticizing an identifiable group, and you back off. Everybody does.
Speaker 4: Otherwise you know you are playing with fire. When someone complains,
Speaker 4: the police will come and you may be charged. Usually,
Speaker 4: trying to defend your case in court is much worse
Speaker 4: than just pleading guilty and paying a fine in court,
Speaker 4: he said, you face financial and emotional exhaustion as you're
Speaker 4: dragged through the human rights tribunals. You said that in Canada.
Speaker 2: Christians know, so think about the abuse of that too.
Speaker 2: Anybody they don't like they can put through that process
Speaker 2: to financially destroy them. Right. They could even do it
Speaker 2: to people within money. Whatever the case may be. Someone
Speaker 2: doesn't like you, they put out a claim and it
Speaker 2: gets investigated, right, investigated in my ass, when there's an
Speaker 2: influence behind that allegation, there's no investigation. You're defending and
Speaker 2: losing battle, plain and simple, and it'll destroy you financially.
Speaker 4: Playing the favoritism of the government towards such identifiable groups
Speaker 4: as homosexuals and Jews do not come near any public
Speaker 4: criticism of their beliefs or the gay As a result,
Speaker 4: Christians strictly obey the hate crime laws. That is why
Speaker 4: there are virtually no Christians being tried for violation of them.
Speaker 4: It is not that a moral dilemma does not exist. Rather,
Speaker 4: very few Christians are willing to court disaster by criticizing
Speaker 4: federally protected groups. Instead, they withdraw into the fellowship of
Speaker 4: their churches and into those aspects of religion that still
Speaker 4: remain politically safe.
Speaker 1: Yet this is not the pattern Christ set for him.
Speaker 2: We've gotta skip That was most of it. We got
Speaker 2: to skip over. Now we gotta get to the next thing.
Speaker 2: We'll start here and I'm going to play something at
Speaker 2: the end here, So just to make sure that get
Speaker 2: it in, because I think they are kind of important.
Speaker 1: An shouldn't curse in Deuteronomy still lies heavily on the Jews.
Speaker 2: Okay, so this one is called a second zionis in
Speaker 2: Christianity the unholy alliance. And we're just picking up a
Speaker 2: couple of things about the talbot Heir real quick, and
Speaker 2: then we're gonna call.
Speaker 4: It in my book, Israel our Duty, our dilemma, I
Speaker 4: detaeil how Judaism was corrupted by the occult and immoral
Speaker 4: practices of Babylon. Let's touch very briefly.
Speaker 2: On they were the corruptors of Babylon. Babylon didn't do
Speaker 2: it to them.
Speaker 4: They did it to them, just one aspect.
Speaker 2: Of playing with black magic, getting a dark passenger, having
Speaker 2: that forever like a parasite, guide your destiny and bring
Speaker 2: you into doing darker things for that thing that continues
Speaker 2: to need to be fed. They have it.
Speaker 4: Such depravity pederasti, or the sexual molestation of children. Today,
Speaker 4: the greatest rabbis of the Talmud would be locked up
Speaker 4: as child molesters. Pederasti was deeply entrenched among the most
Speaker 4: respected Talmudic rabbis. It was taken for granted that the
Speaker 4: local rabbi could acquire a baby girl at three years
Speaker 4: of age as his sex toy, simply by raping her.
Speaker 4: Here are several passages from many in the Talmud granting
Speaker 4: such permission. In Nida forty five, be a woman asks Master,
Speaker 4: at what age may a woman marry? At the age
Speaker 4: of three years in one day? He told her, a
Speaker 4: girl of three years in one day may be betrothed
Speaker 4: by intercourse. Rabbi Joseph said, come and here, a maiden
Speaker 4: of three years old in a day may be acquired
Speaker 4: in marriage by coition. When a grown up man has
Speaker 4: intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing. The footnote
Speaker 4: to this passage says tears come to the eye again
Speaker 4: and again, so does virginity come back to the little
Speaker 4: girl under three years. Although the Talmud forbids homosexuality among
Speaker 4: adult Jews, sodomy with small boys is permitted Leviticus twenty
Speaker 4: thirteen forbids sexual relations between men. The Talmut, however, defines
Speaker 4: a boy under nine years of age as a miner,
Speaker 4: not a man. He is excluded from the biblical prohibition.
Speaker 4: Since the boy is not sexually mature. The Talmud teaches
Speaker 4: he cannot throw guilt upon the rabbi who rapes him.
Speaker 2: And this is among their own people too. This is
Speaker 2: but this is at the heart of Frankism too, except
Speaker 2: they don't have boundaries on age.
Speaker 4: Only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse
Speaker 4: may throw guilt upon the active offender, whilst he who
Speaker 4: is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot.
Speaker 1: It is significant that the pederasty we have mentioned is
Speaker 1: endorsed by the very greatest rabbis of the Talmud. These
Speaker 1: include Rabbi ben Zaki, Rabbi Ben Johai, and Rabbi Akaba.
Speaker 1: Christ accused the Pharisees of all uncleanness. This may have
Speaker 1: included child sex.
Speaker 4: It is because of such unbelievable darkness and immorality largely
Speaker 4: absorbed from sixteen hundred years in Babylon, that the Book
Speaker 4: of Revelation gave a new name to the Harlot of
Speaker 4: the Old Testament. She is now called Babylon, the Great
Speaker 4: Mother of Harlot's and abominations of the Earth. Her chief city, Jerusalem,
Speaker 4: is also referred to from heaven, not as Jerusalem, but
Speaker 4: as Sodom in Egypt, a term denoting sexual vice and bondage.
Speaker 4: In the eleventh century AD, the inhabitants of Babylon expelled
Speaker 4: the Jews once again, the mother of Harlot's Israel was
Speaker 4: forced to wander among the nations. After the Harlot was
Speaker 4: expelled from Babylon, she was forced to enter the Western
Speaker 4: and ultimately the modern world. Yet she was full of
Speaker 4: purpose and revenge. Before her rebellion, she possessed the respectability
Speaker 4: of a married woman with a lavish house and city
Speaker 4: to dwell in. Yet now having been cast out, she
Speaker 4: vowed she would return to her house in lands, the
Speaker 4: temple and capital city Jerusalem. Once secure in her land,
Speaker 4: she would find another husband who hated Jesus as much
Speaker 4: as she did. Together they would mock Jesus by ruling
Speaker 4: the world from Jerusalem with this great and uh.
Speaker 2: Put that on the backtop of what's going on in
Speaker 2: Israel right now.
Speaker 4: The sinister goal in mind, the Harlot conceived an intricate
Speaker 4: and very long range plan to corrupt Christ's new bride,
Speaker 4: the Church, and weaken the nations. She planned to so
Speaker 4: deceive and corrupt humanity that ultimately she and her false
Speaker 4: husband might assume control of the nations. During this medieval period,
Speaker 4: mystical rabbis children of the Harlot perfectly expressed their mother's
Speaker 4: plan for world dominion. They recorded her intentions in the Zohar,
Speaker 4: also called Kabbalah. To day, religious Jews consider the Zohar
Speaker 4: to be as inspired as the Talmud. Most ultra Orthodox
Speaker 4: Jews consider it even more inspired. Quoting the Zohar, Rabbi
Speaker 4: Jehudah said to him, Rabbi Chezhkiya, he is to be praised.
Speaker 4: He is able to free himself from the enemies of Israel,
Speaker 4: and the just are much to be praised to get
Speaker 4: free from them and fight against them. Rabbi Chezkia asked,
Speaker 4: how must we fight against them? Rabbi Jehudah said, by
Speaker 4: wise counsel, thou shalt war against them? By what kind
Speaker 4: of war? The kind of war that every son of
Speaker 4: man must war against his enemies, which Jacob used against
Speaker 4: Esau by deception.
Speaker 2: Right deception was at the heart of that story. By
Speaker 2: way of deception, thou shalt do war the masad, the.
Speaker 4: Seat and trickery were ever possible, they must be fought
Speaker 4: against without ceasing, until proper order be restored. Thus it
Speaker 4: is with satisfaction that I say we should free ourselves
Speaker 4: from them and rule over them. Because the Harlot's children
Speaker 4: were gifted merchants, she sent them forth as money lenders.
Speaker 4: During the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Her children became usurers,
Speaker 4: not only to the people of Europe, but to kings.
Speaker 4: As a result, she gained fabulous wealth. She created a
Speaker 4: network of banking houses, including the Rothschild's, Warburgs and Shifts.
Speaker 2: The Eminent and the Shifts In the Rothschilds actually shared
Speaker 2: a very large house in Frankfurt. Frankfort was the heart
Speaker 2: of a lot of things British, including the Illuminati, which
Speaker 2: is not surprising when you understand who they are.
Speaker 4: Story and Nesta Webster, in her Many books, which were
Speaker 4: publicly praised by Winston Churchill, described how Jews made use
Speaker 4: of secret societies. Freemasonry and the Illuminati were secret yet
Speaker 4: incredibly organized anti Christian organizations attempting to subvert Christian society.
Speaker 4: Through incredible organization and intrigue, they sought to establish their
Speaker 4: own new world order. Although primarily composed of Gentiles, Jewish
Speaker 4: agents of the Harlot were able to manipulate these secret
Speaker 4: societies to the Harlot's own ends, with the assistance of
Speaker 4: Freemasonry and the Illuminati, the Harlot's children so discord. This
Speaker 4: not only helped bring down the French monarchy, but largely
Speaker 4: destroyed the power of the Catholic Church in France through.
Speaker 2: Jacobins, Francists, Jesuits, Yep, through the Massonic lodges in seven
Speaker 2: and we collectively call those people the perfectible listing of
Speaker 2: the Illuminati.
Speaker 4: Nineteen eighty five, in Germany, a courier for the Bavarian
Speaker 4: Illuminati was killed when a lightning bolt struck him. When
Speaker 4: local police went through his bags, they found incredibly detailed
Speaker 4: evidence of how the Illuminati.
Speaker 2: Had they were sewn into his jacket, actually.
Speaker 4: Infiltrated all German universities during the latter eighteenth century. Through
Speaker 4: invention of so called higher criticism of the Bible, the
Speaker 4: Illuminati eroded faith in the Land of Luther. This paved
Speaker 4: the way for the rise of Hegel Riechi and Nazism.
Speaker 2: Easy on that last one, buddy.
Speaker 4: But it was through communism that the Harla most impacted
Speaker 4: the modern world. Jewish revolutionaries masterminded and led the Bolshevik
Speaker 4: Revolution in Russia. Such Jewish overthrow of the Czar and
Speaker 4: conquest of Russia was funded by the Jewish banking house
Speaker 4: of qun Lobe in New York and by the Rothschilds
Speaker 4: and Warburgs in Europe. The Encyclopediajudic tells us the communist
Speaker 4: movement and ideology played an important part in Jewish life.
Speaker 4: Individual Jews played in.
Speaker 2: Right that Kahl has run communistically and it has been before.
Speaker 2: There's communism other places Sanhedrin, that was all. That's what
Speaker 2: it comes from.
Speaker 4: Important role in the early stages of Bolshevism and the
Speaker 4: Soviet regime. The great attraction of communism among Russian and
Speaker 4: later also Western Jewry emerged only with the establishment of
Speaker 4: the Soviet regime in Russia. Communism and support of the
Speaker 4: Soviet Union thus seemed to many Jews to be the
Speaker 4: only alternative, and Communist trends became widespread in virtually all
Speaker 4: Jewish communities. During this period, intelligent services of the Western
Speaker 4: Powers were a buzz with reports of Jewish control of
Speaker 4: the Bolshevik Revolution. American intelligence from Siberia reported that of
Speaker 4: three hundred and eighty four commissars, more than three hundred
Speaker 4: were Jews. The Bolshevik movement is in.
Speaker 2: The others fellow travelers in the Masonic lodges.
Speaker 4: Has been since its beginning, guided and controlled by Russia Jews.
Speaker 4: Jews predominate in local Soviet government, anti Jewish feeling growing
Speaker 4: among population. Fifty percent of Soviet government in each town
Speaker 4: consists of Jews. British intelligence reveals the same pattern. There
Speaker 4: is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international movement
Speaker 4: controlled by Jews. Bolshevik leaders did not represent Russian working classes,
Speaker 4: most of them being Jews and Dutch intelligence. Bolshevism is
Speaker 4: organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality and
Speaker 4: whose one object is to destroy for their own ends
Speaker 4: the existing order of.
Speaker 2: Things, no nationality and destroying the existing order of things
Speaker 2: is one dred percent. What the kabbala, the Lurian kabbala,
Speaker 2: not the well I mean, sure Moses de Leon or
Speaker 2: Moses the lion that Zohar but personified in the retelling
Speaker 2: and the reimagination of reimagining of creation with the vessels
Speaker 2: and all that crab came from Laria. But what was
Speaker 2: the goal to either there's two ways to get to
Speaker 2: the Messiah, the messhakrate corrupt the entirety of the planet,
Speaker 2: making it depraved and perverse, or make everybody good. Well,
Speaker 2: they're not going to go the other way, so they
Speaker 2: went the other way. They went with the corruption.
Speaker 4: Here is a photo of the First People's Commissariat. From
Speaker 4: left to right are Uritzky, Trotsky, Zenoviyev, Sparedlov, Kaganovich, all Jewish.
Speaker 4: Sir Winston Churchill, writing in the Illustrated Sunday Herald of
Speaker 4: February eighth, nineteen twenty, sums up the Jewish creation of communism.
Speaker 4: There is no need to exaggerate the part played in
Speaker 4: the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about
Speaker 4: of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the
Speaker 4: most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one,
Speaker 4: with the notable exception of Lenin. The majority.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but Lenin's children spoke Yiddish. There's got to be
Speaker 2: more to that story. I know they always say Lenin wasn't,
Speaker 2: but I don't know. I don't think that's true.
Speaker 4: Authority of the leading figures are Jews. Quoting the American
Speaker 4: Hebrew of September eighth, nineteen twenty, the Bolshevist Revolution in
Speaker 4: Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction,
Speaker 4: of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new
Speaker 4: order in the world. What was performed in so excellent
Speaker 4: a way in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains and because
Speaker 4: of Jewish dissatisfaction and by Jewish planning, shall also become
Speaker 4: a reality all over the world as a result. In
Speaker 4: Russia and China alone, not to mention such communist countries
Speaker 4: as Cuba and Cambodia, at least one hundred and eighty
Speaker 4: six million people were killed, millions of whom were Christians.
Speaker 3: The great kind of stifles the.
Speaker 2: Man. It's a little bit more than six million, especially
Speaker 2: six million that didn't happen.
Speaker 4: Harlot has become drunk with the blood of the martyrs
Speaker 4: of Jesus. In the years that followed the Bolshevik victory
Speaker 4: to all forms of liberalism, socialism, and Marxism, the children
Speaker 4: of the Great Harlot worked feverishly to break down faith
Speaker 4: in Jesus Christ and the moral values he taught. That
Speaker 4: is why almost all assaults against Christian activities and symbols
Speaker 4: in the twentieth century, in both schools and public places,
Speaker 4: are spearheaded by such Jewish civil liberties organizations as the
Speaker 4: American Civil Liberties Union, People for the American Way, and
Speaker 4: the Anti Defamation League.
Speaker 2: Of Isn't that funny? People for the American Way, That's
Speaker 2: not the American Way. Anti defamation of select groups because
Speaker 2: God for bid youb of European descent, if you catch
Speaker 2: my drift. They don't care about that. In fact, they
Speaker 2: attack that the banig Bereth.
Speaker 4: For example, the primary opponent of Judge Roy Moore and
Speaker 4: his defense of the Ten Commandments is Jewish lawyer Morris
Speaker 4: V's and his Southern Poverty Law Center. In the same way,
Speaker 4: so called anti hate laws of them pioneered both in
Speaker 4: the US and Canada by the Jewish Anti Defamation League
Speaker 4: of Banig Bereth. These are really anti Christian laws ending
Speaker 4: free speech in Canada. Canadian Jewish Congress recently pushed through
Speaker 4: Parliament its new anti hate Bill C. Three hundred. C
Speaker 4: three hundred makes it a criminal offense to publicly use
Speaker 4: the Bible to argue against homosexuality. Penalty for violation is
Speaker 4: five years in prison. In America, also, the ADL's Monster
Speaker 4: Anti Hate Bill, a Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act awaits
Speaker 4: passage by Congress, it would establish a vast federal anti
Speaker 4: hate bureaucracy similar to candidates. Such Jewish victories are possible
Speaker 4: because the Mother of Harlot's is in media control of
Speaker 4: the nations. Here's how the Great Harlot has acquired such
Speaker 4: staggering power.
Speaker 1: As the twentieth century donned countless immigrants fled political, religious,
Speaker 1: and economical pression in Europe. Those numbers included millions of Jews,
Speaker 1: mostly from Eastern Europe.
Speaker 2: Not yes, they're so oppressed.
Speaker 1: Fluent in the English language, such Jews, like other immigrants,
Speaker 1: found it difficult to penetrate the economic and cultural life
Speaker 1: of America. However, the invention of the silent Movie by
Speaker 1: Thomas Edison provided Jewish immigrants with the opportunity to enter
Speaker 1: a new enterprise not dependent upon language skills or dominated
Speaker 1: by large capital and established interests. They began by showing
Speaker 1: silent movies in shabby little movie theaters, especially in the
Speaker 1: poor immigrant quarters. Since immigrants did not have to understand English,
Speaker 1: silent movies were immensely popular. Soon, some Jewish theater owners
Speaker 1: began distributing films as well as buying other theaters. Their
Speaker 1: earnings enabled them to enter the field of film production.
Speaker 1: Migrating from the East Coast to sunny southern California, many
Speaker 1: of run down movie theaters found themselves the heads of
Speaker 1: large Hollywood film companies. The first of the Hollywood film
Speaker 1: giants to emerge was Paramount, founded and managed by former
Speaker 1: Jewish theater owner Adolph Suker. Paramount quickly dominated film production
Speaker 1: and distribution by its insistence that local theaters rent only
Speaker 1: Paramount's films. One Jewish producer who tried to fight Paramount's
Speaker 1: monopoly was Carl Lemmol. In nineteen twelve, he founded what
Speaker 1: ultimately became Universal Studios. William Fox, another Jew, founded what
Speaker 1: later became twentieth Century Fox. At nearly the same time,
Speaker 1: Louis B. Mayer, owner of a chain of movie theaters
Speaker 1: on the East Coast, founded what became Metro Golden Mayor
Speaker 1: with the advent of talking pictures. The other companies founded
Speaker 1: and headed by Jews wrote to greatness. Columbia was owned
Speaker 1: and dominated by Harry Kohne. Warner Brothers was founded by Jack,
Speaker 1: Harry Sam and Albert Warner. As the prestigious Encyclopedia Judaica
Speaker 1: tells us, thus, all the large Hollywood companies, with the
Speaker 1: exception of United Artists, were founded and controlled by Jews.
Speaker 1: In its article on television and radio, the Judaica is
Speaker 1: also quick to give Jews credit for the development of
Speaker 1: radio and television. It says that David Sarnoff started the
Speaker 1: first US radio chain, the National Broadcasting Company, in nineteen
Speaker 1: twenty six as a service of RCA. He developed RCA
Speaker 1: into an electronic giant. Sarnoff also pioneered the development of
Speaker 1: color television, building NBC into one of the big three
Speaker 1: TV networks in nineteen twenty five. The Judaica tells us
Speaker 1: CBS Radio was founded by another Jew, William S. Paley,
Speaker 1: a Chicago cigar maker, Pilley bought up an unsuccessful chain
Speaker 1: of Eastern US radio stations. Through his long lifetime, he
Speaker 1: built CBS into a multi billion dollar television empire. The
Speaker 1: third major television network, ABC, the Judaica says, was an
Speaker 1: outgrowth of an antitrust suit against NBC in the early
Speaker 1: nineteen forties. Leonard Goldenson became its president as its soared
Speaker 1: to similar domination of national television. Yet who owns the
Speaker 1: Big three today? Today? Sarnoff's NBC is owned by General
Speaker 1: Electric Corporation, yet it is still run primarily by Jews.
Speaker 1: The president of NBC News Andrew Lack is Jewish, as
Speaker 1: is senior vice president of Operations and Planning j Fine.
Speaker 1: Vice president of program Development Jeffrey Gaspin, and Vice president
Speaker 1: Vera Mayer are also Jewish. This confirms the famous Lichtor
Speaker 1: Roffman poll of top media executives, which found that fifty
Speaker 1: nine percent are Jewish. Today, William Paley's CBS is owned
Speaker 1: by another jew, Sumner Redstone, whose original name was Murray Rothstein.
Speaker 1: Sumner Redstone also owns Viacom, the producer and distributor of
Speaker 1: TV shows for all three networks. Viacom is the largest
Speaker 1: provider of cable TV programming, owning such cable giants as Showtime,
Speaker 1: MTV and Nickelodeon. MTV is the dominant cultural influence on
Speaker 1: teens and youth in their twenties in the world today.
Speaker 1: In addition to owning paramount studios, Sumner Redstone also owns
Speaker 1: a New York publishing empire which in include Simon and Schuster.
Speaker 1: Leonard Goldenson's ABC network is now owned by Michael Eisner,
Speaker 1: the owner of Disney and a pro homosexual Jew. Eisner
Speaker 1: owns ESPN Cable and Merrimac's movie studios, making his media
Speaker 1: empire the second largest in the nation after acquiring Disney. Eisner,
Speaker 1: like the other Jewish media moguls we have mentioned, has
Speaker 1: pursued a policy of replacing Gentiles with Jews in leadership
Speaker 1: positions the biggest.
Speaker 3: Media, you know, like they did to our government.
Speaker 1: The Leviathan in the world today is AOL Time Warner.
Speaker 1: Until its merger with internet provider AOL Time Warner, controlled
Speaker 1: by Gerald Levin, a Jew, was the second largest communications
Speaker 1: empire in America. Levin bot Turner Broadcasting in nicenineteen ninety
Speaker 1: six and appointed Jewish executive Walter Isaacson as head of
Speaker 1: the CNN newsgroup.
Speaker 2: Time the CIA.
Speaker 1: NN Warner owns HBO, the country's largest pay TV cable
Speaker 1: record company, as well as Warner Brothers Studios. Time Warner's
Speaker 1: publishing empire is headed by chief editor Norman Pearlstein. In
Speaker 1: two thousand, Time Warner was bought by internet provider AOL
Speaker 1: headed by Gentile Steve Case. Case was chairman of this
Speaker 1: new Megamedia empire while Gerald Levin was CEO. Recently, however,
Speaker 1: possibly because of financial mismanagement, both Case and Levin have
Speaker 1: been forced to step down. Levin's African American appointee, Richard Parsons,
Speaker 1: is now in control. Not far behind is the media
Speaker 1: empire of Edgar Bronfman, the second Jewish heir of the
Speaker 1: Seagram's Distillery fortune. He owns the biggest record business in
Speaker 1: the world, PolyGram, as well as Universal Studios and the
Speaker 1: legendary Jewish media giant MCA, nicknamed the Octopus for the
Speaker 1: extent of its power in the communications and recording industries.
Speaker 2: Remember the Brahmans are the reason why the big push
Speaker 2: to put fluorite in the water was a thing.
Speaker 1: MCA is best known for its production of the blasphemous
Speaker 1: movie The Last Temptation of Christ. Rupert Murdoch, owner of
Speaker 1: the News Corporation and Fox Television Network, while not Jewish,
Speaker 1: is strongly pro Israel. His president and CEO of the
Speaker 1: Fox group, Peter Chernin, is Jewish. The Los Angeles Jewish
Speaker 1: Times confirms our summary four of the largest five entertainment
Speaker 1: giants are now run or owned by Jews. Murdoch's News
Speaker 1: Corporation at number four, is the only gentile holdout.
Speaker 2: However, Rupert, the terminology has holdout, is as.
Speaker 1: Pro Israel as any Jew, probably more so. Canada's largest
Speaker 1: media conglomerate is can West Global, owned by Jewish media
Speaker 1: mogul Israel Asper. Asper rules his media empire of seventeen
Speaker 1: Canadian daily newspapers and over one hundred weeklies plus radio
Speaker 1: and TV stations with an iron hand.
Speaker 2: Imagine trying to get an honest report about something they
Speaker 2: accuse you of into the papers. Right, You're already condemned
Speaker 2: by public opinion long before any mock trial takes place.
Speaker 2: When you try to defend yourself from an indefensible position,
Speaker 2: not because you did it or did anything, it's indefensible
Speaker 2: because the system is rigged. Against you, and the public
Speaker 2: opinion is what it matters.
Speaker 1: He forbids criticism of Israel. Today, Even though ownership of
Speaker 1: communication networks may change hands, Jews continue to direct and
Speaker 1: staff the media. Their power and presence only increases. The
Speaker 1: Encyclopedia Judaica, in its article on publishing, also reveals that
Speaker 1: a preponderance of US daily newspapers and most New York
Speaker 1: publishing houses are Jewish owned. These include the three most
Speaker 1: influential newspapers in America. First is The New York Times,
Speaker 1: including its New York Times Book Review, the standard guide
Speaker 1: to bookstore and library purchasing. Second is the newspaper most
Speaker 1: influential upon lawmakers on Capitol Hill, the Washington Post. The
Speaker 1: Washington Post also publishes the International Herald Tribune, the most
Speaker 1: widely distributed newspaper in the English language. Third in influence
Speaker 1: is the Wall Street Journal.
Speaker 3: And even though now you have.
Speaker 2: You know mister Amazon himself Bezos in control of the
Speaker 2: Washington Post, do you have to ask yourself where his
Speaker 2: loyalties lie.
Speaker 1: With its daily circulation of four million, such staggering power
Speaker 1: over the printed page does not include the literally hundreds
Speaker 1: of newspapers throughout the nation that are owned by Jews.
Speaker 1: Such power begins with the New York Daily News, The
Speaker 1: Village Voice, the New York Post, and spreading out through
Speaker 1: the vast publishing empire of the Samuel Newhouse chain of
Speaker 1: thirty daily newspapers. New House also owns Parade Magazine, with
Speaker 1: its circulation of twenty two million. Jewish control of the
Speaker 1: newspaper industry constitutes a complex web of Jewish media interconnection.
Speaker 1: Until Gerald Levin recently stepped down from control of AOL
Speaker 1: Time Warner, Jews had dominated the three most influential news
Speaker 1: magazines in America, Time Newsweek and US News and World Report.
Speaker 1: Mortimer Zuckerman, owner and editor in chief of U S
Speaker 1: News and World Report, also owns Atlantic Monthly and The
Speaker 1: New York Daily News. The Encyclopedia Judaica, in its article
Speaker 1: on publishing, confirms that two of the three largest book publishers,
Speaker 1: Simon and Schuster and Random House, have during the twentieth
Speaker 1: century been Jewish owned. Only very recently has Random House
Speaker 1: become a subsidiary of the German media giant Bartelman's ag
Speaker 1: The third AOL Time Warner, while no longer under the
Speaker 1: direct control of Gerald Levin, remains under powerful Jewish influence.
Speaker 1: A half dozen Jewish publishers and distributors also control distribution
Speaker 1: of ninety five percent of best selling books.
Speaker 2: And the rest. They have the neighbor at ADL to,
Speaker 2: you know, manipulate their actions, censor them, so they control everything.
Speaker 4: The Book of Revelation describes them.
Speaker 2: We've got to cut it now because we are at
Speaker 2: almost three hours. I didn't expect to be here this long.
Speaker 2: Why did I keep doing that? Looks so silly. They
Speaker 2: decided to recrop me. Thanks, thanks a lot, guys, thanks
Speaker 2: for recropping. Really, that wasn't doing that before. It was
Speaker 2: a full page. Maybe it's just a glitch.
Speaker 3: Okay, So there we have it.
Speaker 2: There it is, And since we're on the topic of books,
Speaker 2: you can find it on my website and you can
Speaker 2: find the links to Amazon and Barnes and Noble. It
Speaker 2: was self published, so you're not going to find it
Speaker 2: in bookstores unfortunately. Maybe when I do a second one,
Speaker 2: they'll be, you know, another way to get it published,
Speaker 2: but this is the way it is at the moment.
Speaker 2: You can get it from me if you want to signed.
Speaker 2: You can also get it from Amazon, Barnes and Noble,
Speaker 2: or on digital copy. On Coobo and Lulu. Priest Craft
Speaker 2: Beyond Babylon. That's priest Craft Beyond Babylon. Okay, thank you
Speaker 2: for watching. Check out the links in the description that
Speaker 2: we mentioned in the beginning of the show in the
Speaker 2: description of the videos, and please support your local well
Speaker 2: dad first, history guy. Second, thank you.