Speaker 1: This is Dan Kaplis, and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Kaplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. MAT used to
Speaker 1: be in the warm up act. I used to be
Speaker 1: in the main event, right, but we are the warmackt
Speaker 1: warm up act four tonight and I've been dying to
Speaker 1: get back on air since certain news broke last night.
Speaker 1: So glad it is finally four h six in the
Speaker 1: Rocky Mountain West. Glad you are here, hey, some of
Speaker 1: the tidbits of news. This is fascinating to me. Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris is already at the debate venue, right, already there
Speaker 1: three hours in advance. Trump he's just rolling in, right,
Speaker 1: He's I think his playing hasn't even landed yet in Philadelphia.
Speaker 1: So you can see these two different styles. And there's
Speaker 1: no right or wrong here. It's whatever works for you, right,
Speaker 1: and Trump's done this a bunch and what works for him.
Speaker 1: What's fascinating is I think on the campaign trail, very
Speaker 1: very often, unless he's on the opposite coast, he'll fly
Speaker 1: home sleep in his own bed and then fly back
Speaker 1: out to wherever he's going the next day. So he's
Speaker 1: got his routine, and that's great. Whatever works for him, Harris,
Speaker 1: I mean, I can relate to her approach, which is
Speaker 1: kind of the you know, typical regimented debate prep and
Speaker 1: then getting to the venue early. I'm telling you, every
Speaker 1: case I try, I am the first one at that
Speaker 1: courthouse door when they open the door in the morning,
Speaker 1: And to me, that's just I get a lot of
Speaker 1: comfort from that. I want to get there early, I
Speaker 1: want to get set up, I want to get in
Speaker 1: the zone. So I understand her approach there. Now, she's
Speaker 1: got much bigger problems, right because when we roll into court,
Speaker 1: we're right, and we've got we got the fags, we
Speaker 1: got the truth on our side. She's rolling in and
Speaker 1: she's trying to pull a con. She's trying to pull
Speaker 1: off the big lie. You know that she doesn't really
Speaker 1: believe the things she believed or the things she currently believes.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just one big lie. So she's got
Speaker 1: a much much tougher job there. Eight y five for
Speaker 1: zero five eight two five to five The number text
Speaker 1: DN five seven seven three nine and the reason I've
Speaker 1: been so anxious to get back on air with you
Speaker 1: is is what happened last night on CNN. And what
Speaker 1: happened last night when CNN unleashed this story about the
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen questionnaire that Kamala Harris filled out in that race,
Speaker 1: which lays out all of her true beliefs right, and
Speaker 1: we know they're her true beliefs for lots of different
Speaker 1: reasons that we can review together. But obviously the big
Speaker 1: news is that CNN decided to run that story and why.
Speaker 1: And I am as convinced as my own name, I'm
Speaker 1: convinced of anything I've ever known in my life that
Speaker 1: I know the answer to that question. But I wanted
Speaker 1: to play this sound for you first, and it truly
Speaker 1: is remarkable. Now. We dabbled in this last week, Remember
Speaker 1: when CNN ran that story about Kamala Harris the fifty
Speaker 1: different times she had condemned the border wall and mocked
Speaker 1: it and ridiculed it, and now she's adopting it and
Speaker 1: claiming it's her own idea. And so we talked about, Okay,
Speaker 1: why do you think they're doing that? But this thing yesterday,
Speaker 1: this took it to a whole different level.
Speaker 2: Here's a taste a K file investigation has uncovered meanti
Speaker 2: I'm a twenty nineteen questionnaire and in this questionnaire, Harris
Speaker 2: laid out some much more liberal stances, among them on immigration.
Speaker 2: So in twenty nineteen, and what K file found, she
Speaker 2: said she would cut funding to ICE, writing, quote, our
Speaker 2: immigrant detention system is out of control, and I believe
Speaker 2: we must end the unfair incarceration of thousands of individuals, families,
Speaker 2: and children. I was one of the first senators after
Speaker 2: President Trump was elected to advocate for a decrease in
Speaker 2: funding to ICE. Well, now, of course she's touting the
Speaker 2: Biden administration's executive order to crack down on the border.
Speaker 1: And now, I hey, CNN's just getting warmed up.
Speaker 3: This questionnaire is really an interesting snapshot in time of
Speaker 3: that twenty nineteen Democratic primary. Kamala Harris was trying to
Speaker 3: get to the left of Bernie Sanders, she was trying
Speaker 3: to get to the left of Elizabeth Warren. And you
Speaker 3: really see that in a lot of these answers. And
Speaker 3: I want to walk our viewers through a little bit
Speaker 3: of what she said. Let's just take immigration and look
Speaker 3: at what she said here. She said on immigration, she
Speaker 3: made this open ended pledge to end immigrant attention. She
Speaker 3: said she supported taxpayer funded gender transition surgeries for detained migrants.
Speaker 3: She also said she.
Speaker 2: Taxpair funded gender transition surgeries for detainment change Mike actually
Speaker 2: said she supported.
Speaker 3: She wrote both wrote and answered in the affirmative when
Speaker 3: she was asked this, and she said she also supported
Speaker 3: it for federal prisoners.
Speaker 1: So if there was any doubt about what CNN was
Speaker 1: trying to do here and there's more and we'll get
Speaker 1: it to you than what Aaron Burnett did at the end,
Speaker 1: there just puts any doubt to rest, right, because listen,
Speaker 1: she knew what was in this package. She knew what
Speaker 1: he was going to say before he said it. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know it's true. I know it's true. I've done
Speaker 1: a ton of this TV stuff, some national, out of
Speaker 1: it local, and they absolutely knew what was going to
Speaker 1: be said before they said it. So why did she
Speaker 1: decide then to pile on and to mock to make
Speaker 1: sure everybody noticed it?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 1: Why wait a second, hey, listener, if you're busy cooking something,
Speaker 1: listen to this. She wants to use your taxpayer dollars
Speaker 1: to pay for people in jail, to cut off their
Speaker 1: body parts and change their sex. I mean, CNN, and
Speaker 1: you can be sure this wasn't Aaron Burnett going rogue.
Speaker 1: CNN wanted to make sure you caught that part. So
Speaker 1: they were trying to do as much damage as possible.
Speaker 1: And the fact that they led with immigration, well, listen,
Speaker 1: everybody knows right now that is probably the number one issue,
Speaker 1: even bigger than the economy, is the open borders. And
Speaker 1: obviously the open borders undermind's the economy, etc. So why
Speaker 1: why did they do this? Well, this brings me back
Speaker 1: to something I was saying a week or two ago,
Speaker 1: and that is and I think it's made one hundred
Speaker 1: percent certain through that CNN report. The powers on the
Speaker 1: left I'm not saying there one hundred percent unified, but
Speaker 1: most of the powers on the left, and you can
Speaker 1: be sure the Obamas they want Kamala Harris to lose.
Speaker 1: They must have Kamala Harris lose. They are desperate to
Speaker 1: have Kamala Harris lose. And the reason for that is
Speaker 1: if she wins, it devastates the Democratic Party. And if
Speaker 1: you're the Obamas, right, if you're the Obamas or any
Speaker 1: of these big money people, in the Democratic Party has
Speaker 1: been your tool. Literally you can do with it what
Speaker 1: you want to accomplish your own purposes. You need that tool.
Speaker 1: You need that tool intact, you need that tool functioning.
Speaker 1: You need that tool able to pull off the lie
Speaker 1: so you can win elections. And they know that Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris is so terrible that she is going to do
Speaker 1: enormous damage to their tool, to the Democratic Party over
Speaker 1: the next four years. They need her to lose. That's
Speaker 1: what this story is all about. You think the timings
Speaker 1: a coincidence, coming the day before the debate. I'll play
Speaker 1: some sound for in a few minutes. It'll prove part
Speaker 1: of the reason CNN did that was to put pressure
Speaker 1: on ABC, to put pressure on ABC to bring this
Speaker 1: stuff up tonight because they need her to lose. And
Speaker 1: think about it in a snapshot, and I'll put meat
Speaker 1: on the bones as we take calls and texts. But
Speaker 1: if you're Obama right now and you're looking at this scenario,
Speaker 1: what you know is this she is so bad. She
Speaker 1: is so lacking in what it takes to be president,
Speaker 1: from intellectual capacity, to skills, etc. Judgment, all of that
Speaker 1: that she is going to have by far, the most
Speaker 1: terrible presidency we've known in our lifetime. This nation is
Speaker 1: going to suffer in incalculable ways. Enemies are going to
Speaker 1: be devouring her, the nation that the world's going to
Speaker 1: be on fire, America may well be drawn into another war,
Speaker 1: the economy is going to suffer greatly at every single front.
Speaker 1: She is going to fail, and the nation's going to
Speaker 1: take it out on the Democratic Party. So the Democrats
Speaker 1: are then because of her failed presidency, they're going to
Speaker 1: get wiped out in the midterms. They're going to get
Speaker 1: wiped out in the Senate, which is setting up favorably.
Speaker 4: To begin with.
Speaker 1: They're going to get wiped out in the House in
Speaker 1: the midterms, and then they're going to get wiped out
Speaker 1: in twenty eight. So all of this quote good young
Speaker 1: talent they have with all these terrible ideas, But the
Speaker 1: Whitmers and the Newsoms and the Shapiros and all that talent,
Speaker 1: they're on the bench for eight years because she's going
Speaker 1: to be the sitting president. If she wins, she's going
Speaker 1: to be their nominee. They can't depose a sitting president nominee,
Speaker 1: though didn't they do that recently? Yeah, but they're not
Speaker 1: going to be able to do it to her because
Speaker 1: of their identity politics. So all this talent and quotes
Speaker 1: is going to be on the bench for eight years,
Speaker 1: and the GOP is assured of victory in four years.
Speaker 1: And the GOP has a ton of young talent that
Speaker 1: that's going to be competing to beat her in four years.
Speaker 1: And here's the key, here's the cherry on top. The
Speaker 1: Democratic Party is going to sacrifice all of that. It's
Speaker 1: going to lose all of that, undergo all of that
Speaker 1: harm if she wins in exchange for what not a
Speaker 1: zilch nothing that matters to them, because you know what
Speaker 1: matters to them. All that matters to them is the
Speaker 1: US Supreme Court. And if she wins, they aren't going
Speaker 1: to get any new justices during her four years. Maybe
Speaker 1: they convince sodomority to step aside, but I doubt it.
Speaker 1: But even if they can convince her to step aside,
Speaker 1: they don't pick up a Conservative seat. So the Democrats
Speaker 1: undergo this massive damage for the next eight years, her
Speaker 1: four and then the damage beyond that in their view,
Speaker 1: because the GOP wins, and what do they get in return?
Speaker 1: They don't even get a Supreme Court seat. So yeah,
Speaker 1: they want her to lose. That's why that CNN piece
Speaker 1: ran back in a flash here on the Dan Caplass Show.
Speaker 4: And now back to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 3: You at the pledge to be slacked immigration detention by
Speaker 3: fifty percent, close all family and private facilities, and decrease
Speaker 3: funding for ICE and then the end and ICE detainers
Speaker 3: with local law enforcement.
Speaker 2: I mean, these are things that you know, it would
Speaker 2: be hard to think that you would come up with
Speaker 2: taxpayer funding gender transitions for detained migrants. And yet this,
Speaker 2: as you say, written and verbally.
Speaker 1: This is Aaron Burnett on CNN who then circles back
Speaker 1: to it. So if there was ever any doubts CNN
Speaker 1: ran this piece because they want her to lose, there
Speaker 1: is none now. And I would love to hear anybody's
Speaker 1: alternative explanation for that. If you just joined us, thank you.
Speaker 1: I made the case in the last break for why
Speaker 1: Barack Obama and the powers on the left want Harris
Speaker 1: to lose this election, and I don't think there's any
Speaker 1: doubt about it, and it's why both Obamas did not
Speaker 1: want her as the nominee, and they came out and
Speaker 1: they were public about that very early. They said they
Speaker 1: wanted an open a process because they know that unless
Speaker 1: Trump literally hands it to her, she is going to lose.
Speaker 4: And is that.
Speaker 1: Because oh, they know she's going to lose the debate tonight. No,
Speaker 1: she's already been declared the winner. She'll be declared the
Speaker 1: winner tomorrow. Has nothing to do with that. They know
Speaker 1: a couple of things. A they know what's out there
Speaker 1: on her right that we don't even know about yet.
Speaker 1: I'm going to play something for you in a second
Speaker 1: that guarantees her defeat. Guarantees her defeat, and you haven't
Speaker 1: heard it yet, hasn't even been on your radar. It
Speaker 1: guarantees her defeat unless Trump literally hands it to her.
Speaker 1: And let me play it for you right now. So
Speaker 1: nobody's speculating before we even get to this. The Obama's new,
Speaker 1: the Obama's new, and Joe Biden new, because remember, Joe
Speaker 1: Biden wants her to lose. Joe Biden wants the people
Speaker 1: who humiliated him and deposed him and stripped him of
Speaker 1: the nomination and his dignity, he wants them to fail.
Speaker 1: That's why he forced Kamala Harris on him. But here
Speaker 1: is what a loan will defeat her. And I know
Speaker 1: there are five six different things we've played for you
Speaker 1: before that alone would defeat her if played on a loop,
Speaker 1: and swing states, this will make the margin very large,
Speaker 1: because across America, this is so radical, this is so
Speaker 1: far left, it is so insane that it'll cut through
Speaker 1: all the noise and be an automatic disqualifier.
Speaker 3: The question from the ACLU was, since drug use is
Speaker 3: better addressed as a public health issue through treatment in
Speaker 3: another programming, will you support the decriminalization at the federal
Speaker 3: level of all drug possession for personal use? And Harris
Speaker 3: answers yes, Now what would that mean? Will it mean
Speaker 3: the federal fentanyl, all all drug possession. That's the mess marijuana,
Speaker 3: which she she lied to in her answer to this question,
Speaker 3: But it also would mean yea cokain and things like that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, give me a break. This election's over unless the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign is idiotic, and they're not. You think these
Speaker 1: swing state voters are going to elect somebody who wants
Speaker 1: to legalize crack, who wants to legalize meth, who wants
Speaker 1: to legalize fentanyl. That's wacky, wacky stuff. And she already
Speaker 1: wasn't gonna win because America is not going to elect
Speaker 1: uh San Francisco radical, but legalizing meth, legalizing fentanyl. And
Speaker 1: do you think people are gonna believe for a second
Speaker 1: when she says, oh no, my attitude one that has changed?
Speaker 1: Well when and why? I think people are going to
Speaker 1: believe that for a second. No, And even if for
Speaker 1: some reason they had any doubt, they're not going to
Speaker 1: take the chance. So I'm not saying that Trump can't
Speaker 1: lose this race. I'm saying she can't win. The only
Speaker 1: way she ends up as president is if Trump hands
Speaker 1: it to her. But the important point today is that's
Speaker 1: why CNN ran this story. Obama and the powers on
Speaker 1: the left want her to lose because if she wins,
Speaker 1: she's going to be so terrible and her presidency is
Speaker 1: going to be so terrible. The Dems get wiped out
Speaker 1: in the midterms, they get wiped out in twenty eight
Speaker 1: and all of their big so called talent is on
Speaker 1: the bench for eight years. Yeah, all right, let's go
Speaker 1: to the phone lines. Let's go to text. Boy, what
Speaker 1: a night it's going to be. I'm sure you have
Speaker 1: your ideas of what you want to see from Trump tonight.
Speaker 1: I have mine and I think that some of mine
Speaker 1: may surprise you, Dan. Do you think Harris says some
Speaker 1: thing on one of the guys or gales, oh Hunter,
Speaker 1: Jill Obama. That's why she was eventually picked as the
Speaker 1: chosen one. Good question. No, she was picked by Biden
Speaker 1: because he wants her to lose. He wants the Democrats
Speaker 1: to lose. He wants the people who humiliated him and
Speaker 1: deposed him to fail. He wants to be sitting there
Speaker 1: on election night and crowing about the fact that, see,
Speaker 1: I was the only one who can beat Trump. That's
Speaker 1: why Biden forced Harris on them. Does anybody think for
Speaker 1: a second that there was anybody else in the Democrat
Speaker 1: hierarchy who wanted Harris not a chance. Obama's came right
Speaker 1: out and said it. They wanted an open process. No,
Speaker 1: Biden forced Harris on them, and they're stuck with her.
Speaker 4: Real quick, did you remember Gavin Newsome sitting down with
Speaker 4: the hosts of Pod Save America, one of the biggest
Speaker 4: left of center podcasts that's out there, and he very
Speaker 4: coyly and sarcastically say, hey, had an you know, very
Speaker 4: thorough process, and you know she's the rightful cannonary.
Speaker 1: Minutes is what he said, right, thirty minute Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: totally mocked it. And he doesn't say that if you
Speaker 1: think if he thinks she's going to be the next president, correct,
Speaker 1: because he knows what's out there on her. And he
Speaker 1: did it again today when he came out and he
Speaker 1: talked about how she should do more interviews. But no,
Speaker 1: they know what's out there. Explain to me. Can somebody
Speaker 1: look me in the eye and tell me how Trump
Speaker 1: loses this race when Kamala Harris is now on record
Speaker 1: is wanting to legalize fentanyl and legalize crack and CNN's
Speaker 1: pushing the story. Now, Ryan, how much pressure does that
Speaker 1: put on ABC now to do something tonight with what
Speaker 1: CNN reported. I think it puts ABC in a position
Speaker 1: where they have to they.
Speaker 4: Have to And Dan, I want to ask you why CNN,
Speaker 4: why Aaron Burnett specifically on her program and why now
Speaker 4: this moment?
Speaker 1: I think, Well, they did it now. I think because
Speaker 1: of the timing of the debate, right, and I think
Speaker 1: they wanted it out there before the debate so it
Speaker 1: would do more harm to Hey Harris, so ABC would
Speaker 1: have to be tougher honor Trump could use it. Trump
Speaker 1: would have to use it right because now it's in
Speaker 1: the public domain. So I think that's the reason for
Speaker 1: the timing. Ryan. I think, and this can only be
Speaker 1: a guess, but my guess is that any doubt, any
Speaker 1: doubt about whether she was going to lose this race,
Speaker 1: was put to rest when she showed up at CNN
Speaker 1: to do that spongebath. Because think about it, CNN knows
Speaker 1: what happened there. They haven't released the transcript, they haven't
Speaker 1: released the raw video. She was there for over an hour,
Speaker 1: and they could only cobble together sixteen minutes of video
Speaker 1: for that alleged interview, and sixteen minutes where Harris wasn't
Speaker 1: very good most of the time. So I think CNN
Speaker 1: probably looked at what happened that day and said, no,
Speaker 1: she has got to lose. She's going to destroy us
Speaker 1: if she's in office for four years. Hey, when we
Speaker 1: come back, let's dive into what you want to see
Speaker 1: Trump do tonight. And I'd love to hear from you.
Speaker 1: I've got a very specific approach in mind, but I
Speaker 1: do think it's going to surprise you on the issue
Speaker 1: of how aggressive Trump should because everybody's talking about restrained
Speaker 1: poise et cetera, which is all true, but how aggressive
Speaker 1: he should be. I'll give you my thoughts here on
Speaker 1: the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 4: You're listening to the Dankaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 3: The question from the ACLU was, since drug use is
Speaker 3: better addressed as a public health issue through treatment and
Speaker 3: other programming, will you support the decriminalization at the federal
Speaker 3: level of all drug possession for personal use? And Harris
Speaker 3: answers yes, Now what would that mean? Will it mean
Speaker 3: the federal all all drug possession that's not just marijuana,
Speaker 3: which she alluded to in her answer to this question,
Speaker 3: But it also would mean yeah, level cokaine and things
Speaker 3: like that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, sure, ticket to success in the Swing States,
Speaker 1: legalize crack. No, here's a little hand for the less.
Speaker 1: They don't get this because they just don't value human life.
Speaker 1: That they don't see the inherent dignity and value. It's
Speaker 1: all about the collective. Parents, including Democrat parents, love their
Speaker 1: children much more than they love their political party. And
Speaker 1: a candidate who wants to legalize crack and fentanyl and math. No,
Speaker 1: that candidate is not going to win, so she can
Speaker 1: out win. Trump could lose if he hands it to her.
Speaker 1: And I certainly don't expect that. Hey, let's go to
Speaker 1: the VIP line. Welcome Christy Burton Brown back to the
Speaker 1: Dan Kaplis Show. Fresh off a big win on property
Speaker 1: tax reform, now pursuing one of the true work of
Speaker 1: Angels issues out there, which is true school choice. You
Speaker 1: want to talk about liberating all these poor kids and
Speaker 1: giving all kids a fair opportunity, level playing field. The
Speaker 1: Democrats worst night, maare right, Christy, because the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: literally relies on a certain number of people not earning
Speaker 1: much money. Because once people start earning sixty grand more
Speaker 1: and a majority start voting Republicans, so they got to
Speaker 1: keep people down. And once you have true school choice
Speaker 1: and all these kids, and all these kids of color,
Speaker 1: they have an equal opportunity or a roughly equal opportunity
Speaker 1: in education, guess what they're going to break out of
Speaker 1: that cycle. They're going to prosper and the left is dead.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 6: Well, Dan, I think you hit on a couple of
Speaker 6: spential points there, as always. But first of all, that
Speaker 6: parents care more about their kids succeeding than they do
Speaker 6: their political party. That's one reason this amendment it's going
Speaker 6: to be a mint eighty on the ballot is so
Speaker 6: popular across the political spectrum, no matter what party you
Speaker 6: belong to. Across Colorado, most voters think that parents should
Speaker 6: get a choice in kids' education. That one size doesn't
Speaker 6: fit all in that charter school, of private schools, homeschool,
Speaker 6: traditional neighborhood public school should be open to all kids.
Speaker 6: And you're so right about the economic and racial diversity
Speaker 6: that opens up in charter schools, in particular in Colorado
Speaker 6: that the Left sometimes doesn't like at all, but they
Speaker 6: actually serve more economically and racially diverse populations than traditional
Speaker 6: public schools.
Speaker 1: Yeah, which is another overtly racist and effect policy of
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party to a post school choice.
Speaker 6: Right.
Speaker 1: I mean, you saw the movie Waiting for Superman. You
Speaker 1: saw those lines of people of color literally for blocks
Speaker 1: to try to get in and qualify for that charter
Speaker 1: school program in DC, and Michael Bennett and the Democrats
Speaker 1: just moved to crush all of that.
Speaker 6: Yeah. No, and we're seeing that in Colorado. That's one
Speaker 6: reason that at Advanced Colorado we're bringing this measure because
Speaker 6: the legislature is beginning to attack charter schools try and
Speaker 6: shut them down. In Colorado. There are anti charter school
Speaker 6: districts across the state. That to your point, Dan, doesn't
Speaker 6: matter that hundreds of parents, literally hundreds, are on waiting
Speaker 6: lists and say we want to send our kids to
Speaker 6: this charter school and the district just says, Nope, don't
Speaker 6: want to let it in. That shouldn't be happening in Colorado,
Speaker 6: a state where people claim to support choice often right.
Speaker 1: Jared Paulus in the Left, you have the choice to
Speaker 1: dismember the child seconds before it's born, but the parents
Speaker 1: shouldn't have the choice where to send the kid to
Speaker 1: school if they decide to let it live, So they
Speaker 1: can have the choice to dismember, have it dismembered seconds
Speaker 1: before birth, but not where to send the baby to school.
Speaker 6: I mean, it doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
Speaker 6: If you are a party that's going to claim you're
Speaker 6: for all choices, school choice should be an easy one.
Speaker 6: And honestly, Dan, as you know, I mean, you and
Speaker 6: I are extremely pro life and we'd love to fix
Speaker 6: that issue. I hope we fully do one day. But
Speaker 6: I think when we look at education across the political spectrum,
Speaker 6: people want choice, they want educational options. It consistently pulls
Speaker 6: extremely high. You know, this. One reason Ron DeSantis one
Speaker 6: in Florida, It's one reason Bill Owens one in Colorado
Speaker 6: so many years ago, is because they said, hey, we're
Speaker 6: going to make sure we allow more and better schools
Speaker 6: in every area so that all kids can succeed.
Speaker 1: Yeah. No, that's right. But but again, the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: knows it's the deaths of them if all of these
Speaker 1: children of color and others succeed, right, I mean, it
Speaker 1: is the death of them. They depend on dependency. The
Speaker 1: Democratic Party depends on dependency on government.
Speaker 6: Right. Well, and you've seen that Democrat Party actually in
Speaker 6: Colorado just put out their list of recommendations on pallet measures,
Speaker 6: and they're recommending a no vote on the right to
Speaker 6: school choice. Yeah, which is been bipartisan for decades. I mean.
Speaker 6: And Jared Polis himself actually has at least said that
Speaker 6: he supports school choice in Colorado. Michael Buddett has claimed
Speaker 6: to support school choice, though he didn't exactly do it
Speaker 6: in DC.
Speaker 1: Well, Polis can prove it here with eighty, right, it
Speaker 1: could prove it by supporting eighty.
Speaker 6: We love that, you know, it's a basic and this
Speaker 6: is the thing that I think voters need to know
Speaker 6: about him. In the eighty It's basic, it's simple, it's
Speaker 6: common sense. A lot of school choice measures across the
Speaker 6: nation have had programs to them. This one doesn't. It's
Speaker 6: a simple statement of rights. School choice is a right
Speaker 6: here in Colorado, putting that in the constitution, and Dan,
Speaker 6: this matters to a lot of your listeners. It also
Speaker 6: says the parents have the right to direct the education
Speaker 6: of their child, not the government, but parents right.
Speaker 1: And Christy Burton Brown, our guest with Advanced Colorado. Obviously,
Speaker 1: the only success Jared Poulis cares about is his own,
Speaker 1: and he is willing to sacrifice an awful lot of
Speaker 1: kids killed before birth, an awful lot of kids deprived
Speaker 1: of equal opportunity and education if it advances Jared Poulis.
Speaker 1: And what a small and sad way to live.
Speaker 6: I mean, you know, I would love to see him
Speaker 6: come out strong for school choice. I don't think that's
Speaker 6: a huge, huge leaf from what he claims to believe.
Speaker 6: Same with a lot of elected officials across Colorado. And
Speaker 6: we are seeing a growing list of people across the
Speaker 6: political spectrum endorse this amendment and say, yeah, school choice
Speaker 6: is a hallmark of Colorado. It's not necessarily a partisan
Speaker 6: thing in those often conservatives who spearhead the fights when
Speaker 6: it comes down to voting for it and putting it
Speaker 6: into law. I think we can all work together to
Speaker 6: get this one.
Speaker 1: Done well right, and eventually this is going to succeed.
Speaker 1: And I think you in advanced Colorado are so wise
Speaker 1: to be pushing it because when we talk about changing
Speaker 1: voting habits, right, I mean, how do you reach the
Speaker 1: folks who whether they're folks like you know, our family
Speaker 1: growing up in Chicago, whether there are folks who happen
Speaker 1: to be of color who have these habitual kind of
Speaker 1: vote for Democrat patterns. You know, it's through issues like
Speaker 1: this where you point out, hey, wait a second, these
Speaker 1: Democrats have been keeping your kids down for decades, and
Speaker 1: here's how we can liberate them and give them a
Speaker 1: fair chance. That's the sort of thing that I think
Speaker 1: is going to break the cycle, the economic cycle, and
Speaker 1: break voting habits.
Speaker 6: And I agree with you, Dan, it has to be
Speaker 6: a focus on issues in a state like Colorado, where
Speaker 6: you know, people like to fi different parties with different
Speaker 6: brands that aren't necessarily accurate, but when they see, huh,
Speaker 6: who is it, who's actually fighting for choice and education,
Speaker 6: for keeping violent criminals in jail, for solving property taxes,
Speaker 6: for funding law enforcement, all these things that most voters
Speaker 6: agree with. Oh, it is conservative to our fighting for it.
Speaker 6: I think that issue focus can reach across party lines
Speaker 6: and draw people in.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And in the end, Christy, I think there are
Speaker 1: a few things out there that can dramatically change America
Speaker 1: for the better quickly than true school choice. And you
Speaker 1: know it wouldn't happen in two weeks, but put it
Speaker 1: could certainly happen in a decade or too. Dramatic change.
Speaker 1: And so I'm really glad you're on this And where
Speaker 1: could people go to learn more and to support it?
Speaker 6: Thank you, Dan Advance Colorado dot org to give you
Speaker 6: plenty of information about our ballot measures and how you
Speaker 6: can join us.
Speaker 1: Wonderful. Well, hey, look forward to the next visit. And
Speaker 1: I know you're not going to watch this so called
Speaker 1: debate tonight.
Speaker 6: Right, I'm going to hide one of the people that
Speaker 6: just have to.
Speaker 1: Okay, so fifteen seconds, what's your prediction. What's this going
Speaker 1: to look like? Who's going to win?
Speaker 6: I think Trump will do it. I think he's going
Speaker 6: to use self control like he mostly did in the
Speaker 6: debate against Biden, and he will show that Kamala Harris
Speaker 6: does not have a plan that stands out from the
Speaker 6: last three years of Biden.
Speaker 1: Christy, appreciate the time. Talk soon, Thanks Dan, Thank you,
Speaker 1: take care. And this is hilarious. Kamala Harris has been
Speaker 1: at the venue for the so called debate since before
Speaker 1: this show started. Here's Trump planes rolling up right, and
Speaker 1: I love his style. Right, plane's rolling up right now.
Speaker 1: He's just going about his normal day. He's gonna get
Speaker 1: off the plane. They'll roll over there, get there with
Speaker 1: a few minutes to sparin. Hey, I like that style,
Speaker 1: and I trust he will be ready when we come back.
Speaker 1: We'll go to phone and text. But I want to
Speaker 1: tell you what I think he needs to do, what
Speaker 1: I think he will do tonight and why why No
Speaker 1: matter what happens tonight, No matter what happens tonight, Donald
Speaker 1: Trump cannot lose the election tonight, but Kamala Harris can
Speaker 1: so no matter what happens tonight, Donald Trump can win
Speaker 1: it tonight. He can put it away tonight, but he
Speaker 1: cannot lose it tonight. You're on the Dan Caplas Show.
Speaker 4: And now back to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 1: This is on Take the Same today.
Speaker 5: But I do want to ask you about the CNN report.
Speaker 5: It shows Harris voice support for cutting funding for ICE
Speaker 5: and for using taxpayer money to fund transgender surgery for
Speaker 5: detained migrants in twenty nineteen. Does the Vice President still
Speaker 5: support those positions and do you expect her to address
Speaker 5: them tonight?
Speaker 1: Wait a second before I get to the answer from
Speaker 1: the Harris spokesperson. What the question needs to be is
Speaker 1: is that Stiller position? If not, when did it change
Speaker 1: and why? So questions and you'll hear them tonight from ABC.
Speaker 1: Is this still your position? Are meaningless? You got to
Speaker 1: pin her down on when did that change and why?
Speaker 1: But listen to the answer.
Speaker 4: Listen.
Speaker 7: I think you know, these old questionnaires are a complete
Speaker 7: distraction from the task at hand right now, I think
Speaker 7: the Vice and frankly, what the American people are actually
Speaker 7: asking about, right but the American people are concerned about,
Speaker 7: and what they're asking about is who's going to solve
Speaker 7: for border security?
Speaker 1: Now? They're asking who the blank is?
Speaker 3: She?
Speaker 1: He poses it a questionnaire from twenty nineteen, is if
Speaker 1: it answered itself? No, these are her stated positions, but
Speaker 1: here's what really matters and the reason I played that
Speaker 1: sound for you. ABC chose to ask about it today,
Speaker 1: and we open this show by playing the CNN sound
Speaker 1: from yesterday where they buried Harris with these indefensible positions
Speaker 1: that are meant to under mind her campaign. That's why
Speaker 1: CNN ran the story because Obama and others on the
Speaker 1: left need her to lose. She knows she's going to
Speaker 1: be a terrible president who will do tremendous harm to
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party. That's why CNN ran the story. But
Speaker 1: then ABC felt the pressure to go ahead and ask
Speaker 1: that question today of the Harris campaign. Does that mean
Speaker 1: you'll get a question like that in the debate tonight?
Speaker 1: We'll find out. I think it probably does. Let's go
Speaker 1: to Stephen's Point Wisconsin. Then I'll come back and explain
Speaker 1: why I tease before the break that Trump can win
Speaker 1: it tonight, he can put it away tonight, but he
Speaker 1: cannot lose it tonight. Now i'll explain why Cynthia from
Speaker 1: Stephen's Point Wisconsin, you're on the Dan Kaplis, she'll welcome.
Speaker 8: Oh, thank you so much. Dan. Just wanted to let
Speaker 8: you know that I was at the Trump Rowley on
Speaker 8: Saturday with my grandchildren. Oh wow, and yes they're in.
Speaker 8: They're all of voting age, which is wonderful. And they
Speaker 8: that's Trump a hundred great plus plus my husband was
Speaker 8: one of fifteen children and all of his nieces and
Speaker 8: nephews and there's hundreds of them. Band they're all Trump supporters.
Speaker 1: That's awesome.
Speaker 8: Hispanic we go Hispanic Trump supporters and it's wonderful.
Speaker 1: Nice.
Speaker 8: But at the rally dance there were I had to
Speaker 8: be over eight thousand people. It was amazing, and we
Speaker 8: were right in front and President Trump was acknowledging all
Speaker 8: of us. It was just wonderful.
Speaker 1: Oh that is awesome. And so, Cynthia, how do you
Speaker 1: persuade a neighbor who say undecided? The people already voting
Speaker 1: for Harris, there's no chance to persuade them. But folks
Speaker 1: who are undecided, how do you do that?
Speaker 6: Well?
Speaker 8: I think I believe, first of all, I go back
Speaker 8: to the Trump record when he was in office from
Speaker 8: sixteen to twenty and show them exactly what he has
Speaker 8: done for the Middle American people, which which are who
Speaker 8: we are? And I would I would probably key in
Speaker 8: on those certain economy points, the border.
Speaker 1: And the border. Well, Cynthia, we know, we know this, right,
Speaker 1: we know. If you help Trump win Wisconsin, the race
Speaker 1: is over, right, I mean, yeah, yeah, it's well, good
Speaker 1: luck up there, thanks to the call.
Speaker 8: Yes, you're welcome, Thank you appreciate it.
Speaker 4: What a neat lady on Wisconsin.
Speaker 1: Yeah, boy, you win Wisconsin. Now, obviously, if you win Wisconsin,
Speaker 1: it probably means you win Pennsylvania and or Michigan, just
Speaker 1: the whole carryover. But yeah, you win Wisconsin. Backbreaker. Here's why,
Speaker 1: in my humble opinion, Trump can absolutely put the race
Speaker 1: away tonight, but he cannot lose it tonight. And the
Speaker 1: reason he can put it away tonight is Kamala Harris. Right,
Speaker 1: Americans know at this point, you can see it's showing
Speaker 1: up in the polls that come. Alla Harris doesn't have
Speaker 1: the basic skills necessary to be present. And Americans also
Speaker 1: know that it's she's not a legitimate nominee. She didn't
Speaker 1: win any votes. There was a coup and the guy
Speaker 1: who won all the votes was deposed and she was installed.
Speaker 1: Americans know that that combination before you even get to
Speaker 1: her fire radical San Francisco stuff. Yeah, so Americans right
Speaker 1: now have these grave doubts about her. All that a
Speaker 1: lot of people are waiting on is for Trump to
Speaker 1: give them permission to vote for him by being hinged
Speaker 1: instead of unhinged. They know their life was better during
Speaker 1: the Trump years. They just want to see that he's
Speaker 1: hinged so he can put it away tonight. He can
Speaker 1: win tonight. The reason he cannot lose tonight is because
Speaker 1: she is so awful. And that's not a peturity if
Speaker 1: I mean, we have new evidence today, right, she favors
Speaker 1: in her heart and it was her formal position before.
Speaker 1: She favors legalization a crack. Right. She's so awful ideologically
Speaker 1: on so many different fronts. She's so dishonest now as
Speaker 1: she tries to deny what she really stands for. That's
Speaker 1: a terrible combination for her and the Democrats. So even
Speaker 1: if Trump had a horrible night tonight, and he won't,
Speaker 1: even if he had a horrible night tonight, he can
Speaker 1: still win this thing because she is so bad, and
Speaker 1: because he did have a very successful peace and prosperity
Speaker 1: first presidency. And so yeah, it's similar to and believe me,
Speaker 1: I think he's gonna have a good night. But it's
Speaker 1: similar to why and how he was able to win
Speaker 1: an election occurring just weeks after the excess Hollywood tapes
Speaker 1: came out, because Hillary Clinton was so bad and Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris is much worse than Hillary Clinton. So Trump has
Speaker 1: a chance to put it away tonight when we come back.
Speaker 1: How we think he can do that here on the
Speaker 1: Dan Capla Show.