Speaker 1: The idea of a kind of prospective pardon, this sort
Speaker 1: of permanent federal get out of.
Speaker 2: Jail free card. That seems to be what we're talking
Speaker 2: about in.
Speaker 1: The case of this right with Juliani and his three
Speaker 1: eldest children, who as far we know, don't have not
Speaker 1: been convicted of a crime. Maybe they've committed a lot
Speaker 1: and they don't want to face action. I don't know,
Speaker 1: it's weird. I wouldn't ask for a pardon. I don't
Speaker 1: think I deserve one because I don't think I've done
Speaker 1: anything criminal.
Speaker 2: But like, where does that come from?
Speaker 1: That concept that you can just kind of wave your
Speaker 1: magic pardon one.
Speaker 3: We have to James, we have Xavier Prizera, Mimi Roca
Speaker 3: is literally my day in my town. There will be
Speaker 3: opportunities to prosecute these people, regardless if they if they
Speaker 3: abuse the pardon power as they are thinking.
Speaker 1: Hopefully Ellie, there will be a skyfall on this entire crime.
Speaker 4: Family and there will be another day for them to die.
Speaker 5: President does indeed pardon let's say, Rudy Giuliani or any
Speaker 5: members of his family. Would you see that? And I
Speaker 5: asked Prett Ferrara this question, as this essentially an admission
Speaker 5: of guilt.
Speaker 2: Oh, I certainly would view at that lay. I think
Speaker 2: millions of Americans would view it that way.
Speaker 4: If there was no belief in criminality, why would he
Speaker 4: think the pardon was necessary? And in his learned President
Speaker 4: Biden will pardon his son Hunter Biden. Don't take my
Speaker 4: word for it. President Joe Biden said the same ten
Speaker 4: days ago.
Speaker 3: So, sir, have you ruled out a pardon for yourself
Speaker 3: or any other additional members of the family.
Speaker 6: For myself, yes, sir, Well what I pardon myself for?
Speaker 4: That's what I'm asking.
Speaker 6: No, I have no contemplation of pardoning myself friend, that
Speaker 6: I didn't do anything wrong.
Speaker 4: So what's the implication there, Well, it's fairly simple, isn't it.
Speaker 4: That you only need a pardon if you've done something wrong,
Speaker 4: According to Joe Biden himself. Now, let me say I
Speaker 4: don't think that's actually true. I think we live in
Speaker 4: such a highly politicized criminal justice era that you might
Speaker 4: need a pardon even if you've done nothing actually illegal.
Speaker 4: I think Matt Gates, given the the persecution he was
Speaker 4: receiving based off of the what I think were trumped
Speaker 4: up charges. I haven't seen any evidence to confirm that
Speaker 4: he was actually guilty of what they claimed he was,
Speaker 4: but he there was reports that he was in fact
Speaker 4: seeking a pardon from President Trump during his first term
Speaker 4: to get them to back off. So I'm not saying
Speaker 4: that everybody that received a pardon from Joe Biden yesterday
Speaker 4: is in fact guilty. Let me just make that clear.
Speaker 4: I will say this, though, I think the vast majority
Speaker 4: of them are incredibly guilty of incredible crimes. And this
Speaker 4: is not just me guessing here. This is not me
Speaker 4: just saying, oh, I don't like the Democrats and therefore
Speaker 4: they're all guilty, which is essentially what everyone was doing.
Speaker 4: When it came to Trump and his family. They're just saying, well,
Speaker 4: why would he pardon his kids? Of course they must
Speaker 4: be guilty of treason. In reality, they had been getting
Speaker 4: persecuted by an incredibly corrupt criminal justice system, and they
Speaker 4: definitely needed the pardon so that they could actually live
Speaker 4: their lives and function because I don't think there's any evidence,
Speaker 4: Like whatever you feel about Donald Trump, I don' think
Speaker 4: there's any evidence that his kids have done anything illegal,
Speaker 4: but they were still dealing with lawfare. The difference being
Speaker 4: I can actually prove it, or at least come really
Speaker 4: close to proving it.
Speaker 2: I can't come all the way to proving.
Speaker 4: It because we have a secrecy in our government that
Speaker 4: makes it really, really hard to prove out. However, there
Speaker 4: is something, there is a telltale sign in these pardons
Speaker 4: that is giving not just smoke, but a little bit
Speaker 4: of fire in my opinion, and it is this. Now,
Speaker 4: they go back to January first of twenty fourteen. So
Speaker 4: let's go down a list of, you know, very inconvenient
Speaker 4: facts that begin in January of twenty fourteen. Josie the
Speaker 4: Redhead Libertarian did me the honor of pointing it out.
Speaker 1: I think Joe Biden's family committed a bunch of crimes.
Speaker 4: Does it go back to twenty fourteen? It certainly does it,
Speaker 4: Sure it does. So these pardons go back to January first,
Speaker 4: twenty fourteen.
Speaker 2: A quick question, what was going on in Ukraine in
Speaker 2: twenty fourteen?
Speaker 6: Huh?
Speaker 4: But Barisma, It's not just barisma. Trust beyond that. First off,
Speaker 4: we got the Maidan Revolution which happens in twenty fourteen,
Speaker 4: which from all accounts, there's US State Department involvement with
Speaker 4: Victoria Nuland where they assist the Ukrainian people. There was
Speaker 4: genuine discontent, but I think it was it would have
Speaker 4: never been successful if not for US State Department backing
Speaker 4: and funding, That's my opinion. And they overthrew Yanokovich, the
Speaker 4: president of Ukraine at the time, who was elected, who
Speaker 4: had agreed to early elections, and they just said, Nope,
Speaker 4: not going to do that. Then a few months later,
Speaker 4: Hunter Biden gets signed to the board of Barisma. The
Speaker 4: biolabs that exist in Ukraine, according to Victoria Neulin, when
Speaker 4: she was under I guess cross examination from Marco Rubio,
Speaker 4: she acknowledges that these biolabs do indeed exist.
Speaker 2: Well, I only have a minute left.
Speaker 7: Let me ask you, does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons?
Speaker 7: Ukraine has by illogical research facilities, which in fact, we
Speaker 7: are now quite concerned Russian troops Russian forces may be
Speaker 7: seeking to gain control of So we are working with
Speaker 7: the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those
Speaker 7: research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces
Speaker 7: should they approach.
Speaker 4: I'm sure, according to Victoria Nulan, that there are in
Speaker 4: fact biolabs in Ukraine. Russia claims that the research that
Speaker 4: was happening in terms of gain of function. That was
Speaker 4: happening at Wuhan was also happening at the biolabs inside
Speaker 4: of Ukraine. They have used that as part of their
Speaker 4: justification for the invasion. I'll set that point aside because
Speaker 4: I can't prove that definitively. However, I think it's probable.
Speaker 4: I'll say that. So, yeah, that's why the Partons go
Speaker 4: back to January first or twenty fourteen. It's not just
Speaker 4: an accident, it's not just trying to prevent lawfare. Now,
Speaker 4: this is a very specific timeline that was utilized for
Speaker 4: his entire family for a very good reason, because, in
Speaker 4: my opinion, again, can't prove all of this, even though
Speaker 4: I've already demonstrated there's a lot of evidence and a
Speaker 4: lot of smoke to justify my thesis that there is
Speaker 4: in fact a fire, that there was an operation being
Speaker 4: ran in Ukraine. In terms of Hunter Biden being what
Speaker 4: I believe was the bagman for either the US State Department,
Speaker 4: the DoD, the CIA. I don't know who you can
Speaker 4: guess on what I think. I think you guys can
Speaker 4: guess who I think was responsible, because I don't think
Speaker 4: you get away with this unless you're at the tippy
Speaker 4: tippy top, and for the record, I don't think the
Speaker 4: President of United States is at the tippy tippy top.
Speaker 4: So I believe that he was the bagman. That Joe
Speaker 4: Biden was also as Vice President United States under Barack Obama,
Speaker 4: he was the head envoy in Ukraine. That none of
Speaker 4: this is accidental, that the pardons that were issued to
Speaker 4: this date were not accidental, that they are extraordinarily specific
Speaker 4: for a very good reason. And I think they made
Speaker 4: a no oops. I think they should have made it
Speaker 4: a twenty year pardon. But I think they realized that
Speaker 4: a ten year pardon, which is what these were over
Speaker 4: ten years, was already so absurd that they just couldn't
Speaker 4: go any further. But they had to encompass these dates,
Speaker 4: and therefore they did so. Yeah, Anthony Fauci received a
Speaker 4: pardon Hunter Biden, all of his basically Joe's entire family. Okay,
Speaker 4: in the in the waning hours this was this literally
Speaker 4: occurs while Donald Trump is being inaugurated. There's no time left,
Speaker 4: zero second, zero minutes left on the clock, and Joe
Speaker 4: Biden is quietly filing pardon paperwork for everyone in his
Speaker 4: crime syndicate, and I'm calling it a crime syndicate because
Speaker 4: I believe there's enough evidence to say that, and I
Speaker 4: also believe that the pardons demonstrate that I'm not wrong
Speaker 4: that you don't do that, especially not to January first,
Speaker 4: twenty fourteen, unless there's a specific reason. I think that's
Speaker 4: the reason, and I think that we've been ruled by
Speaker 4: an incredibly, incredibly criminal organization at least for the last
Speaker 4: four years, and probably for our entire lives, but definitely
Speaker 4: for the.
Speaker 2: Last four years. Oh my goodness.
Speaker 4: So I wanted to get into that because, setting aside
Speaker 4: the inauguration of Donald Trump and all of his executive orders,
Speaker 4: which I'm going to get into in a second, I
Speaker 4: think that was actually the biggest news of the day.
Speaker 4: There will probably never be the investigations necessary to prove
Speaker 4: definitively what they did. However, what's interesting is that these
Speaker 4: partons make it so that the people that receive pardons
Speaker 4: can no longer plead the fifth Allegedly this will be
Speaker 4: tested in court. I don't know if it's actually going
Speaker 4: to play out this way, but this is what a
Speaker 4: lot of people are reporting that because they already have
Speaker 4: a pardon, they cannot incriminate themselves. They have a blanket parton.
Speaker 4: Whatever they did is fine according to Joe Biden. So
Speaker 4: when you plead the fifth, you're saying, I don't want
Speaker 4: to self incriminate, so therefore I'm not going to speak. Well,
Speaker 4: you can't be incriminated because you have a pardon. Therefore
Speaker 4: you have to tell the truth. And if you don't
Speaker 4: tell the truth, well then you're perjuring yourself. That is
Speaker 4: a crime. Then you go to jail. So that is
Speaker 4: the thesis by which there may still be investigations.
Speaker 2: There still is a off.
Speaker 4: Chance of being genuine discovery, genuine investigations, genuine prosecutions of
Speaker 4: those that did not receive a pardon, and more importantly,
Speaker 4: just to figure out exactly how did this play out?
Speaker 4: Who was responsible? Like, even if we can't throw everybody
Speaker 4: that's responsible in jail, let's actually understand the crime syndicate.
Speaker 4: Let's have the strings and pin board action to see
Speaker 4: who directed what, who was actually who were they doing
Speaker 4: this at the behest of which organizations which through their
Speaker 4: agencies We need to know all that our lives were
Speaker 4: thrown into complete disarray. Effective twenty twenty. Why why did
Speaker 4: this happen. What was the end goal? I have my
Speaker 4: own g I think that, I mean, we've gone through
Speaker 4: this so many times, so I'm going to keep it
Speaker 4: very brief, but I think they wanted to test our compliance,
Speaker 4: that's clearly, and then we failed that. By the way,
Speaker 4: they wanted to bolster corporations and their profit margins, and
Speaker 4: they did an incredible job at that, closing down so
Speaker 4: many small businesses across the entire country, across the world.
Speaker 4: Those are two things I think they wanted to push
Speaker 4: through technology. When it came to science that was experimental, exploratory,
Speaker 4: they wanted to test it on a lot of people,
Speaker 4: and they did so. I think those are like the
Speaker 4: three avenues. And then I think that there's the distinct
Speaker 4: possibility that we're dealing with essentially hybrid warfare, that we
Speaker 4: don't really understand the nature of this entire operation, that
Speaker 4: in fact, we could already be in a war with China.
Speaker 4: That's a possibility we could be allied with China in
Speaker 4: a war against other people. We could have agency that
Speaker 4: aren't we could have groups that aren't even government agencies
Speaker 4: that are participating in this conquering, you know, kind of
Speaker 4: the world economic forum, corporate overlord, banking establishment. I don't know.
Speaker 4: I don't know if they're if they're pulling the strings.
Speaker 4: There's more questions and answers, unfortunately, but I think we
Speaker 4: do know enough at this point to know that what
Speaker 4: we went through was a monstrous, psychological operation.
Speaker 2: Monstrous, and I.
Speaker 4: Think that these investigations in these pardons opens up the
Speaker 4: door by which we may be able to establish who
Speaker 4: was doing this and hopefully why, so that we can
Speaker 4: stop it and make sure it never ever happens again.
Speaker 4: It's important to note too, that a lot of people
Speaker 4: are going to be comparing and contrasting, and they're going
Speaker 4: to say, well, this isn't that big of a deal,
Speaker 4: because well, look what Trump did on his first day.
Speaker 4: He pardoned thousands of people, or over a thousand people,
Speaker 4: including essentially or nearly all of the J sixers. The
Speaker 4: comparison isn't apt.
Speaker 2: Let me explain.
Speaker 4: Biden granted a total of eight thousand and sixty four
Speaker 4: pardons during his first term, whereas Donald Trump granted two
Speaker 4: hundred and thirty seven pardons during his first term. So yes,
Speaker 4: you can look at day one trump second term and say, well,
Speaker 4: he's pardoning so many people, but that precedent was changed
Speaker 4: because of the Biden administration. Eight and sixty four pardons
Speaker 4: during his term, which is the most of any president
Speaker 4: in my lifetime, I think in history, I'm pretty sure.
Speaker 2: So that's a lot. That's a lot.
Speaker 4: Donald Trump can pardon a thousand people for the next
Speaker 4: week and he still wouldn't surpass what Biden did during
Speaker 4: his presidency, and I hope he does now. Keep in mind,
Speaker 4: I'm also not saying that pardon power is necessarily a
Speaker 4: bad thing. I think that oftentimes, just to give Biden
Speaker 4: his due, many of the people that were pardoned by
Speaker 4: Joe Biden, from what I've read, were in fact nonviolent
Speaker 4: drug offenders. That's fantastic. Let those people out. I completely
Speaker 4: agree with that. When you're pardoning your family to keep
Speaker 4: you safe from investigations that would demonstrate your depravity, criminality,
Speaker 4: and likely treason, well then I have a much bigger
Speaker 4: problem with your utilization of pardons. I also have a
Speaker 4: big problem when it is a blanket pardon that has
Speaker 4: no explanation. You're not detailing what crimes that these people are,
Speaker 4: you know, participated in that therefore they shouldn't be prosecuted for.
Speaker 4: Like if you're partning someone who's already in jail or
Speaker 4: facing prosecution, well we know what they're being charged with,
Speaker 4: so we know what you're pardoning them for. Donald Trump
Speaker 4: was saying the j six people, they paid enough price.
Speaker 4: They many of them spent two, three, four years in
Speaker 4: solitary confinement. No matter what you did on that date,
Speaker 4: no one was killed aside from Ashley Bebvett and a
Speaker 4: handful of other ladies. Rosem Boiling and I think there
Speaker 4: was like three or four of the protesters that were killed.
Speaker 4: But in terms of the cops and the politicians, nobody was.
Speaker 4: So at what point do you say, well, this is
Speaker 4: just cruel and unusual punishment, Like I think it's a
Speaker 4: fair argument that it is beyond that threshold already. Did
Speaker 4: anybody do anything that justifies more than four years in prison?
Speaker 4: And if they did, is it dramatically or can we
Speaker 4: just say, well, given that these prosecutions were so politicized,
Speaker 4: we're just.
Speaker 2: Gonna cut it off.
Speaker 4: Here. You had your opportunity, you had entire you had
Speaker 4: years of prosecutions, investigations, FBI breaking down people's doors, going
Speaker 4: i mean all over the country, going to Alaska, pulling
Speaker 4: old ladies out of their houses and throwing them in jail.
Speaker 2: You had all of this, all of these years to
Speaker 2: do that.
Speaker 4: You had an entire j six investigation, congressional hearings, this big, showy,
Speaker 4: over the top nonsense. I think it was ABC that
Speaker 4: did it. It was horrifying to witness, honestly, And what
Speaker 4: you did was you simultaneously hid exculpatory evidence that would
Speaker 4: have allowed many of these people that were being persecuted
Speaker 4: and prosecuted to not face jail time. So once you
Speaker 4: do that, it's basically it spoils the entire thing, right,
Speaker 4: poisons the well, like the well is so poisonous at
Speaker 4: this point that I think everybody justifiably ought to be released.
Speaker 4: I don't think anybody did anything there that justified more
Speaker 4: than a four year solitary confinement sentence. And your behavior
Speaker 4: in the prosecution of these people was so unjust and
Speaker 4: in my opinion, criminal, that therefore we're done. All of
Speaker 4: these partons from Donald Trump were just shout out to
Speaker 4: my buddy, Adam the podium guy got his podium back
Speaker 4: behind me. Actually, I'm thrilled. I'm thrilled that their horrific
Speaker 4: journey has ended here, that they get to move on
Speaker 4: with their lives and not be felons, and you know,
Speaker 4: actually just get back to life. I think that a
Speaker 4: lot of the people there that day were there for
Speaker 4: good reasons. That they were not there to overthrow the government,
Speaker 4: and they were not there to be violent or hurt police.
Speaker 4: They were there because they believed things strongly. And I
Speaker 4: still don't know if I can talk about what they believe,
Speaker 4: so I'll just leave it at that. I think that
Speaker 4: they've paid more than enough price, and I think many
Speaker 4: of them didn't deserve to pay a price whatsoever. In fact,
Speaker 4: the vast majority of them. So I think that this
Speaker 4: was a fantastic winning movement maneuver by Donald Trump. Also,
Speaker 4: when you contrast it with the riots of the Summer
Speaker 4: of Love and the lack of prosecution when it came
Speaker 4: to so many of those people, not to say that
Speaker 4: all of them weren't prosecuted, but many of them were not.
Speaker 4: It's just so obvious that anyone who's an impartial observer
Speaker 4: would just say, well, this is clearly politicized. We had,
Speaker 4: literally just a few months prior to j six, you
Speaker 4: have the entire nation ablaze, and so many of those
Speaker 4: people walk Scott free. You have Kamala Harris and the
Speaker 4: others in the Democratic cabal that are putting together fundraising
Speaker 4: efforts to try and free these people, while simultaneously then
Speaker 4: turning around and pointing at these JA sixers and saying
Speaker 4: put them away forever they tried to overthrow the government,
Speaker 4: for God's sakes. I mean, it was just the contrast
Speaker 4: really highlights how unjust all of that was. And I'm
Speaker 4: glad to see it end. I really am. And I
Speaker 4: hope that Donald Trump. There are reports right now, By
Speaker 4: the way, there are reports right now. Last night, the
Speaker 4: chair of the Libertarian Party, Engel Carl, confirmed that she
Speaker 4: has insider from the White House that the pardon for
Speaker 4: Ross Albricht will happen in the next twenty four hours.
Speaker 4: She thought it was going to happen this morning. It
Speaker 4: has not yet. It appears that it will happen this evening.
Speaker 4: This is the New York Post reporting this, so I
Speaker 4: think it's getting more and more official. My guess is
Speaker 4: that Ross will be pardoned probably by tomorrow and home
Speaker 4: with his family by this weekend. That'll be fantastic news.
Speaker 4: I hope. I hope, and not because I want to
Speaker 4: then go Oh look, Donald Trump promised us something and
Speaker 4: he actually delivered. Like, this is about freeing a human being.
Speaker 4: Fraeing a human being. That even if you believe, which
Speaker 4: many people do, and I understand, there is some evidence
Speaker 4: to say that, like maybe he was actually responsible for
Speaker 4: some really bad stuff with the Silk Road, not setting
Speaker 4: aside the drug charges, which I don't shouldn't be illegal.
Speaker 4: But even if he is responsible, he didn't kill anybody.
Speaker 4: He didn't, that's a fact. No one even claims that
Speaker 4: he did. And he's already spent a lean years in prison.
Speaker 4: So do we believe in second chances or not? He
Speaker 4: had no criminal charges prior to that. It's obvious that
Speaker 4: they threw the book at him because they wanted to
Speaker 4: go after the bitcoin community, and they wanted to go
Speaker 4: after decentralized exchange and the dark web and all that,
Speaker 4: and they made an example of him. Two life sentences
Speaker 4: plus forty years. I think it was plus forty without
Speaker 4: the possibility of parole. That is Eighth Amendment violation, cruel
Speaker 4: and unusual punishment. He deserves to be free, He deserves
Speaker 4: a second chance. I don't care what you think about
Speaker 4: the case. It's over a decade. Come on, let's get real.
Speaker 4: He doesn't deserve more than a decade. So God willing,
Speaker 4: that'll happen. And Lynn Albricht, who I've had on my show,
Speaker 4: I hope that you have the best day of your
Speaker 4: life in the next seventy two hours, and I hope
Speaker 4: you have an incredible remainder of your life after spending
Speaker 4: a decade fighting for your son to be free. It
Speaker 4: has filled me with inspiration to see what you've done.
Speaker 4: And I hope that you get what you deserve, which
Speaker 4: is your boy beack. God willing.
Speaker 8: I don't care about what an Indian says. I'm not
Speaker 8: willing to have a discussion about the definition of what
Speaker 8: an American is. I'm not interested in hearing somebody else's
Speaker 8: proposal for what an American is. Everybody knows what an
Speaker 8: American is. If there's a degree or two of variation
Speaker 8: between Americans what an American is, it doesn't matter. Anytime
Speaker 8: you try to argue in good faith with somebody who
Speaker 8: wants to steal from you.
Speaker 2: You try to argue in good faith with.
Speaker 8: Somebody who is not going to iron man your arguments,
Speaker 8: You're going to give them every intellectual consideration possible, they're
Speaker 8: going to give you none. Anytime you even open your
Speaker 8: mouth to do anything that's not derision, you're losing. You're
Speaker 8: accepting their proposition at what you know, the same way
Speaker 8: you know that the sky is blue, what an American is.
Speaker 8: When you accept that your knowledge of that can be
Speaker 8: a affected by somebody's paragraph, you're already losing. Within your community,
Speaker 8: within your discord, eh, within your friend group, whatever. You
Speaker 8: can have whatever discussion you want. But if it's an
Speaker 8: outsider who's here telling us how to do business, that's
Speaker 8: not in the game.
Speaker 2: Plan, that's not part of the show. That's not happening,
Speaker 2: all right.
Speaker 9: So I'm not saying you need to not think about
Speaker 9: these things and not talk about them with your friends, whatever.
Speaker 9: But when an outsider comes here, gets in your face
Speaker 9: and starts throwing definitions at you, and you've got a
Speaker 9: Google shit, No, we're not doing that.
Speaker 2: You're getting called a slur.
Speaker 8: I don't know which one, whichever one I feel like
Speaker 8: saying at the moment, you're getting called a slur.
Speaker 4: So, for those not familiar, that's Sam Hyde. He is
Speaker 4: a Internet sensation stand up comic. He issued a Dear
Speaker 4: Elon video that went or no. It was dear for
Speaker 4: vaik video during like right after Christmas, after the H
Speaker 4: one B tow and it went insanely viral, and he's
Speaker 4: now issued another one today. He is, he's a fascinating character,
Speaker 4: and I think he makes some really compelling points. Now
Speaker 4: I'm not saying that particular segment was the compelling point,
Speaker 4: but I think that he makes very interesting points about nationalism, Americanism,
Speaker 4: what it means to be an American. Basically, he's calling
Speaker 4: the vake and he has I mean, he's saying it
Speaker 4: more or less explicitly that Avec is an outsider, the vake.
Speaker 4: You may perceive him to be an outsider because he's
Speaker 4: higher echelon of income.
Speaker 2: He's worth half a billion dollars.
Speaker 4: He went to I think Princeton and some other you know,
Speaker 4: fancy law school.
Speaker 2: I think it was Yale. Yeah, it was Yale.
Speaker 4: And you want to say he's like, he's not on
Speaker 4: our level in terms of his upbringing, goes to private
Speaker 4: school and da da dah, he's a valedictorian worth a
Speaker 4: half a billion dollars. Okay, Like, maybe on a class level,
Speaker 4: the VC is not one of us, but in terms
Speaker 4: of him being an American. He was born in Ohio.
Speaker 4: He spent thirty seven years I think maybe he's thirty
Speaker 4: eight now of his life in America. He's also made
Speaker 4: it in America. He also ran for the President of
Speaker 4: the United States in America. He's an American citizen. Yes,
Speaker 4: his parents are first generation immigrants from India. If we
Speaker 4: are now to the point, and I think this is
Speaker 4: kind of a natural pendulum swing that people went from
Speaker 4: I don't mind limited immigration to now anybody that doesn't
Speaker 4: even look like me isn't an American. I think is
Speaker 4: really dangerous but highly predictable. And I've talked about this
Speaker 4: in prior episodes. When it comes to the phenomenon of
Speaker 4: Nick Fuentes and the hard line you know, nationalists and
Speaker 4: alt right movements, that they exist. They're definitely real. I
Speaker 4: don't think that they're as significant as the media would
Speaker 4: have you believe it, but they are definitely real, and
Speaker 4: the sentiment is growing. And I think that the reason
Speaker 4: the sentiment is growing is that no one is actually
Speaker 4: dealing with them in a reasonable fashion. They're not hearing
Speaker 4: them out, they're not actually contending with their arguments. They're
Speaker 4: just saying bad, this is bad that's really all they
Speaker 4: have to say. They just call you racist or whatever,
Speaker 4: and then they move on. But there are arguments to
Speaker 4: be made that, like, when it comes to national identity,
Speaker 4: is that a thing? And is it a thing worth defending?
Speaker 4: In that same video, later on, Sam Hide is talking
Speaker 4: about Japan and he's saying, you know, I'm praying for Japan.
Speaker 4: I hope that they can maintain their national identity as
Speaker 4: being Japanese. Is that racist? Well from most you know,
Speaker 4: I think an impartial observer would say, no, it isn't.
Speaker 4: It's to say that Japan ought to be Japanese and
Speaker 4: that's okay. It's okay to say that. It's okay to
Speaker 4: feel that way. I don't think it's racist to feel
Speaker 4: that way at all. And certainly he's not then demonstrating
Speaker 4: some sort of you know, identitarian superiority, saying I don't
Speaker 4: care what happens to them because they're lesser than me.
Speaker 4: You know, that would be a true like white supremacist mentality.
Speaker 4: So I don't think Sam Hyde has that. I think
Speaker 4: what he does have, though, is a strong sense of
Speaker 4: nationalistic pride. And then it comes down to what do
Speaker 4: you perceive to be the nation? What are the values
Speaker 4: that make it a nation? And Sam would just call
Speaker 4: me gay and say, we're not having this debate. Why
Speaker 4: you're using paragraphs when you can just call me a slur.
Speaker 4: I understand that, Sam, I respect that. However, for those
Speaker 4: that are interested in the thought experiment, I think it
Speaker 4: is worth considering. I think it is worth exploring. What
Speaker 4: is it to be an American? Is it just being
Speaker 4: born here? Can you immigrate here and just be an
Speaker 4: American instantaneously? Well depends on the laws at the time.
Speaker 4: I guess technically you could be. But in my view,
Speaker 4: what makes America special is a belief in essentially the
Speaker 4: Bill of Rights the values that it encompassed and cemented
Speaker 4: for human beings, not just in America, but really more
Speaker 4: broadly across the world. At least that was the concept. However,
Speaker 4: I think that the framework was only really applicable to
Speaker 4: people in America, and it certainly will only be held
Speaker 4: onto by a people that value it. And I think
Speaker 4: that's the key. I think that is actually the key
Speaker 4: to make to what makes you an American or un
Speaker 4: American person? Is that do you want to maintain the
Speaker 4: values that made America special? And from my vantage, point.
Speaker 4: What made America special was not it just being white.
Speaker 4: I know that's very unpopular amongst the alt writers, but
Speaker 4: I don't care because I don't think it's accurate to
Speaker 4: describe America as only having been special because it was
Speaker 4: white people that came here. I think what made America
Speaker 4: continuously special and improving upon itself was that we continued
Speaker 4: to allow for immigration from all over the world of
Speaker 4: the best and brightest, and the most adventuresome and the
Speaker 4: most courageous and entrepreneurial to come here and add their
Speaker 4: spirit to the American endeavor, the American endeavor being one of,
Speaker 4: in my opinion, the height of really human existence, experience growth.
Speaker 4: This is why I love America so much, is that
Speaker 4: I believe that those values are so uniquely special and
Speaker 4: they are not cherished by the rest of the world.
Speaker 4: Which is why I've become more nationalistic in my later years,
Speaker 4: is that I've realized that we are not only are
Speaker 4: these values very special, but they are fleeting. That we
Speaker 4: are losing them. And I think that it's a fair
Speaker 4: concern to say, are we losing them because of so
Speaker 4: much immigration in such a short period of time. Well,
Speaker 4: I don't think it's that simple, but I think it
Speaker 4: plays a part. But I would also add I think
Speaker 4: we're losing it because our kids are being indoctrinated and
Speaker 4: propagandized through this public schooling system and then academia for
Speaker 4: the cherry on the top of the Sunday where they
Speaker 4: just tell them everything that makes America special is actually
Speaker 4: what makes America evil. So that's a big problem. And
Speaker 4: we're talking millions of kids. I don't know how many millions,
Speaker 4: but it's at least a million kids graduating from college
Speaker 4: every year, A big, big percentage of them come out
Speaker 4: with that ideology that is super dangerous. You pair with
Speaker 4: that tens of millions of illegal immigrants over the past
Speaker 4: four years. At least eleven million is according to the
Speaker 4: federal government. I think it's far higher personally. So you
Speaker 4: add those numbers up and you're talking three four five
Speaker 4: percent of the nation in a four year period. That's
Speaker 4: a dramatic change that I don't think that we can
Speaker 4: acclimate to. And I think what you're witnessing is that
Speaker 4: the fact that I'm right, sorry, open borders libertarians, I'm
Speaker 4: right that we're not acclimating to it because it's too rapid.
Speaker 4: You are now seeing extraordinary racist, nativistic perspectives when it
Speaker 4: comes to this entire paradigm. They're just saying, fuck you
Speaker 4: and fuck this, and I'm done and I'm not concerned
Speaker 4: with whatever labels you put on me. I'm pissed and
Speaker 4: I'm ready to fight. That's what they're telling you. You
Speaker 4: can listen to them or you can ignore them, but
Speaker 4: they're not going to stop saying it, and they're certainly
Speaker 4: not going to stop believing it. So I've decided to
Speaker 4: listen to them. I don't necessarily agree with all their conclusions.
Speaker 4: I don't, in fact, but I do understand the concern
Speaker 4: and I think that it'll benefit us if we have
Speaker 4: an adult conversation about the pace at which the face
Speaker 4: of this country is changing. And again, let me remind you,
Speaker 4: this is a very pluralistic civilization. There is already I
Speaker 4: think it's only fifty five or sixty percent of the
Speaker 4: country that's white. You have every other color, creed, race,
Speaker 4: you know, religion under the sun that exists and coexists
Speaker 4: in America. That is very unique. That is not a
Speaker 4: thing that happens in the rest of the world. So
Speaker 4: unless you want to just assume that We're going to
Speaker 4: be successful no matter how fast you allow for more
Speaker 4: and more immigrants to come into this country. I am
Speaker 4: not convinced that you're right at all. In fact, I'm
Speaker 4: totally convinced at this point that you're wrong. That it
Speaker 4: will be our undoing And if we could remedy the
Speaker 4: issues that come from academia, perhaps the immigration issue wouldn't
Speaker 4: be such a huge, huge problem. But honestly, if it
Speaker 4: weren't for what's happening in academia, I don't think we
Speaker 4: would have a governmental model that is permitting such an
Speaker 4: incredible flood of migrant all part of the same program
Speaker 4: in my view, So we need reforms on all levels.
Speaker 4: And this gets me into the executive orders that came
Speaker 4: from Donald Trump just yesterday.
Speaker 10: Look at China, how filthy it is. Look at Russia,
Speaker 10: Look at India. It's filthy.
Speaker 2: The air is filthy.
Speaker 10: The Paris Accord I took us out because we were
Speaker 10: going to have to spend trillions of dollars and we
Speaker 10: were treated very unfairly when they put us in there.
Speaker 10: They did us a great disservice. They were going to
Speaker 10: take away our businesses. I will not sacrifice tens of
Speaker 10: millions of jobs, thousands and thousands of companies because of
Speaker 10: the Paras accord. It was so unfair. China doesn't kick
Speaker 10: in until twenty thirty. Russia goes back to a low standard,
Speaker 10: and we kicked in right away. It would have been,
Speaker 10: it would have been, it would have destroyed our business.
Speaker 4: As So today I want to tell you about our sponsor,
Speaker 4: Monetary Medals. Gold prices have been breaking all time highs
Speaker 4: in twenty twenty four, and now you can get your
Speaker 4: gold to work for you, generating interest income every month
Speaker 4: paid in additional ounces of physical gold. You can earn
Speaker 4: up to five percent on your golden silver and their
Speaker 4: lease offerings, and credit investors can earn double digit returns
Speaker 4: and their bond offerings. Again, all the interest is paid
Speaker 4: in ounces, which are stored for free on your behalf.
Speaker 4: So if you're tired of your golden silver collecting dust
Speaker 4: at home, or worse, racking of fees having your metal
Speaker 4: professionally stored, check out Monetary dash Metals dot com slash
Speaker 4: lockdown again. That's Monetary dash Metals dot com slash lockdown
Speaker 4: to learn how you can start putting your medal to
Speaker 4: work today.
Speaker 2: First up Executive.
Speaker 4: Order from Donald Trump, signed yesterday, notifies the UN that
Speaker 4: we are, in fact, the United States is exiting the
Speaker 4: Paris Climate Treaty or the Paris Climate Accords. This was
Speaker 4: the guidelines that requires basically a cap on carbon emissions.
Speaker 4: There's a lot more details to it. It requires additional
Speaker 4: funding and taxes that we have to send to the UN,
Speaker 4: and all sorts of nonsense. In my opinion, this is
Speaker 4: a unmitigated good. I am not a believer in anthropogenic
Speaker 4: climate change. I do think that there's obvious evidence that,
Speaker 4: in fact, the climate is changing, but I don't think
Speaker 4: that it's proven or rock solid science by any stretch
Speaker 4: of the imagination, that it is this imminent cataclysmic thing
Speaker 4: that is strictly driven by humanity. In fact, I think
Speaker 4: it's quite to the contrary. I think the vast majority
Speaker 4: of the climate change that we're dealing with is natural.
Speaker 4: It's a product of the Sun's fluctuations as well as
Speaker 4: you know Earth. So just look at the fear mongering
Speaker 4: that we dealt with from al Gore back in the
Speaker 4: early two thousands, and all of the predictions you made,
Speaker 4: and what aspect of those have come true. Well, guess
Speaker 4: what I'm in Florida actually in my which was supposed
Speaker 4: to be underwater by now Oops, didn't exactly happen, now,
Speaker 4: did it. So yeah, back to the drawing board on
Speaker 4: that one. Anyways, I don't like being in these global treaties,
Speaker 4: particularly when it's, as Donald Trump pointed out, super unfair. China,
Speaker 4: who's this incredible polluter, doesn't even have to get on
Speaker 4: board with it until twenty thirty and who knows if
Speaker 4: they will. But America gets on board with it right away,
Speaker 4: to the detriment of the American people and US having
Speaker 4: to fund it and get taxed into oblivion, not to
Speaker 4: mention killing businesses and jobs and everything else. I think
Speaker 4: this is just, as I said, an unimitigated good good job,
Speaker 4: Donald Trump. Yes, stay out of the Paris Climate Accords.
Speaker 4: I'm sure the next president will put us right back
Speaker 4: in them. But we get a reprieve for at least
Speaker 4: four years, so let's hope. Next up, we have an
Speaker 4: executive order for Donald Trump notifying all federal employees are
Speaker 4: close to all there's some that have their own unions
Speaker 4: that will be cut out of this deal, but all
Speaker 4: of the rest of them, the majority, have to go
Speaker 4: back to work. Yeah, I know you might be surprised
Speaker 4: by this, but a huge percentage of employees after the
Speaker 4: lockdown era ended up doing work from home deals. This
Speaker 4: ends effective immediately, so we'll see. I think that the
Speaker 4: good aspect of this one. I think that federal employees
Speaker 4: are already not very productive or useful, So I think
Speaker 4: that putting them back, requiring them to actually go to
Speaker 4: work and demonstrate that they're doing a job that's worth
Speaker 4: the taxpayer's funds, I don't have a problem with that.
Speaker 4: I think that that's a good thing. I think it's
Speaker 4: a step in the right direction. And I think that
Speaker 4: we will see a lot of people quit. And I
Speaker 4: think a lot of the people that quit will be
Speaker 4: doing so to the benefit of the American people because
Speaker 4: they are not providing us a good return on investment.
Speaker 4: So that's fantastic news. I think that I think that
Speaker 4: this is a step in the right direction. It's a
Speaker 4: kind of minor one, but that's another executive order that
Speaker 4: he passed. Let's get in the next. He then signed
Speaker 4: an executive order that ended the weaponization of government against
Speaker 4: political opponents. I don't know what kind of teeth this
Speaker 4: thing has. It's just kind of a TBD. Certainly the
Speaker 4: criminal justice system has been weaponized. I don't know what
Speaker 4: what power the president actually has to stop future administrations
Speaker 4: from doing the same thing, but you know it's performative
Speaker 4: if nothing else. He then signed an executive order rescinding
Speaker 4: seventy eight of Biden's executive actions. I haven't looked at
Speaker 4: all seventy eight, but just based off of what I
Speaker 4: know of his executive orders, I'm happy. I think it's
Speaker 4: really good to get rid of whatever we can of
Speaker 4: Biden's legacy, as I think he was a disastrous president
Speaker 4: on almost every single level. I think he's the worst
Speaker 4: in my lifetime, and there's been a lot of bad presidents.
Speaker 4: A lot of people argue George W. Look for the
Speaker 4: Middle East. I'll grant you, definitely worse for the American
Speaker 4: people in terms of the Patriot Act and spying apparatus. Yes, yes, yes, However,
Speaker 4: lockdowns mandates World War three, hundreds of thousands perished combined
Speaker 4: between Palestine and Ukraine. And he also did all of
Speaker 4: this only in four years, whereas George W did an eight.
Speaker 4: I think there's argument that Biden was worse, but whatever,
Speaker 4: they're both terrible. Who really cares who was worse. They
Speaker 4: both deserve to be in president in my opinion. Then
Speaker 4: next up, he signs an executive order freezing federal hiring.
Speaker 2: This is great.
Speaker 4: The reason he's doing this is because it will take
Speaker 4: at least a few weeks, probably a few months to
Speaker 4: get through confirmations of all of his people to get
Speaker 4: them to bring in their staff to replace the old
Speaker 4: Biden administration staff. Do you want those people hiring more
Speaker 4: federal employees when they're Biden staff?
Speaker 2: No, you did not.
Speaker 4: So essentially he's put a freeze until all of his
Speaker 4: people are in and then they'll be more hiring.
Speaker 2: I think that's good. Put a stop on the bleed.
Speaker 4: As they say, I already covered the fact that he
Speaker 4: pardoned fifteen hundred j six ers. I think that's an
Speaker 4: unmitigated good. Once again, here's where Donald Trump and me
Speaker 4: and MAGA may be at loggerheads. I don't know. I
Speaker 4: think actually that there probably are a lot of Trump
Speaker 4: supporters that will agree with me on this, but I
Speaker 4: could be wrong. He issued an executive order Cartel's drug
Speaker 4: car tells are foreign terrorist organizations. This is actually an
Speaker 4: executive order designating the cartels and other organizations to be
Speaker 4: foreign terrorist organizations.
Speaker 11: That's a big one, Yes, sir. People have wanted to
Speaker 11: do this for years, so they are now designated as
Speaker 11: stereost organizations foreign and Mexico probably doesn't want that, but
Speaker 11: we have to do what's right. They're killing our people.
Speaker 11: They're killing two hundred and fifty three hundred thousand American
Speaker 11: people a year, not one hundred like has been reported
Speaker 11: for fifteen years. It's probably three hundred thousand.
Speaker 4: So as you can tell there, his claim being that
Speaker 4: the fentanyl crisis is in fact terrorism somehow. Look, terrorism
Speaker 4: has a very specific definition, and it's usually that you're
Speaker 4: using violence for political end. I don't see that. I
Speaker 4: don't see a justification to label the Mexican drug cartels
Speaker 4: as terrorists now. I think that they're obviously criminal, and
Speaker 4: especially the human traffickers, and i'd love to see them stopped,
Speaker 4: and i'd love to see our the border secured because
Speaker 4: it has been a very significant problem. However, I don't
Speaker 4: think that you're going to be able to stop the
Speaker 4: flow of drugs regardless of what you do. I think
Speaker 4: you'll be lucky to stop the flow of people. That
Speaker 4: is a I mean, and that's a real justifiable concern
Speaker 4: because that actually falls international security. I think that drugs
Speaker 4: are not. The war on drugs is last fifty years.
Speaker 2: We lost it.
Speaker 4: Okay, y'all lost it because I was never fighting it.
Speaker 2: Y'all lost the war on drugs?
Speaker 4: Can we move on? The answer apparently is no. But
Speaker 4: I do understand this is once again kind of the
Speaker 4: same issue that I was talking about with the open borders,
Speaker 4: and you know, the nativistic kind of racist perspectives that
Speaker 4: gain strength during these periods. Same thing with drug prohibition.
Speaker 4: This is the worst of both worlds. You have drugs
Speaker 4: that are illegal in terms of fentanyl, heroin, YadA, YadA da.
Speaker 4: But then you also have legal drugs that are being
Speaker 4: prescribed to millions of Americans over a twenty year period
Speaker 4: from big pharma legally that hooks them on opioids. And
Speaker 4: then you have reforms or whatever that kick them off
Speaker 4: of these prescriptions or they just can't afford them, or
Speaker 4: they just decide to go to something stronger and they
Speaker 4: end up doing street level opioids. This is a bigger
Speaker 4: problem than the border. So I am not going to
Speaker 4: be myopic about this and say, oh, you close down
Speaker 4: the border and all of a sudden everything's fixed like
Speaker 4: and I think that's really my bigger point. This is
Speaker 4: not the fix that Trump is advertising it is, but
Speaker 4: this has red meat to his base. They know a
Speaker 4: lot of people that they've lost due to the opioid crisis,
Speaker 4: fentanyl in particular, and they want it stopped and they
Speaker 4: don't care what he has to do to do it.
Speaker 4: So this is what happens. This is what happens when
Speaker 4: you ignore a genuine problem and then the state intervenes,
Speaker 4: and it may present a solution that ends up being
Speaker 4: a bigger problem. Why do I say that, Well, I'm
Speaker 4: not exactly interested in going to war with Mexico, are you?
Speaker 4: You know, don't get it twisted. I think that Mexico
Speaker 4: to a large extent is a narco state. Their government
Speaker 4: is controlled, or at least they share power to a
Speaker 4: huge extent with the drug cartels. That's obvious. I don't
Speaker 4: want to go to war with the cartels because more
Speaker 4: or less we're then going to war with the government,
Speaker 4: or we're at least requiring the government of Mexico to
Speaker 4: go to war with the cartels. And guess what the
Speaker 4: cartels do business in every major American city across the
Speaker 4: United States. They have tunnels, they have weapons, many of
Speaker 4: which have been given through Operation Fast and Furious from
Speaker 4: the Barack Obama administration. Like, these are trained, dangerous people,
Speaker 4: and I just hope people are really considering what this
Speaker 4: means where this might go. If you decide to actually
Speaker 4: declare war and the cartels decide to declare war back,
Speaker 4: that you could see major Like you're labeling them terrorists
Speaker 4: even though they don't do terroristic things in America, unless
Speaker 4: you want to say the human trafficking, but that's still
Speaker 4: not terrorism because they're not trying to get a political anyways.
Speaker 4: I think that you could see terroristic activity in the
Speaker 4: United States. The consequence of if you start to use
Speaker 4: drones or you know, special ops to go after heads
Speaker 4: of the cartels, will they just accept that or will
Speaker 4: they decide to try and make us pay a price
Speaker 4: to I don't know. That's TBD obviously, I hope not.
Speaker 4: But I think that this is not without risk. I
Speaker 4: think this is not without risk of turning into a
Speaker 4: much wider war. Additionally, if you want to make the
Speaker 4: claim that these people are a national security threat to
Speaker 4: the United States of America, well then get Congress to
Speaker 4: actually vote on this thing, vote for a war. I
Speaker 4: know you guys don't do that anymore. You haven't done
Speaker 4: it in my lifetime, longer than I've been alive. But
Speaker 4: it's so obvious that you're labeling them a terrorist organization
Speaker 4: so that the CIA can go after him, right, I mean,
Speaker 4: we all know this. It also then allows us for
Speaker 4: a bunch of unconstitutional illegal shit like torture, rendition, all
Speaker 4: sorts of other stuff, all without a declaration of war.
Speaker 4: To me, it's quite obvious that they are operating under
Speaker 4: the AUMF authorize US military force after nine to eleven,
Speaker 4: after the patriotach And I think that's what this is.
Speaker 4: I think it's a way of circumventing congressional action to
Speaker 4: actually try and go after this problem, and instead circumventing
Speaker 4: the entire system and just saying I'm gonna do whatever
Speaker 4: I want to stop this. Look, if Joe Biden did it,
Speaker 4: I'd oppose it. Donald Trump's doing it, I oppose it,
Speaker 4: or at least I'll say this. It has the potential
Speaker 4: for real dire consequences, and I'm not sure that it'll
Speaker 4: be productive in terms of stopping drugs.
Speaker 2: So that's my stance.
Speaker 4: A lot of people are just gonna clap blindly without
Speaker 4: thinking this thing through. If anything, whether you support it
Speaker 4: or not, I hope you think about it a little
Speaker 4: bit more deeply because it's not without risk, Like it
Speaker 4: is going to create an incredibly interesting paradigm. Now if
Speaker 4: it's just used for leverage to put pressure on the
Speaker 4: government of Mexico to essentially do the bidding of the
Speaker 4: United States to try and stop the flow of humanity
Speaker 4: coming into our country, Okay, I can see that argument,
Speaker 4: Like it's kind of like the using tariffs in game theory.
Speaker 4: Is that what he's doing. Maybe I don't know. That's
Speaker 4: what he's doing with the northern border. He's threatening tariffs
Speaker 4: against Trudeau even though he's on his way out whoever's
Speaker 4: gonna be in charge of Canada in the next couple months.
Speaker 4: He's saying, look, you get your border under control, or
Speaker 4: I'm gonna tear if you guys too. This is all
Speaker 4: game theory stuff. Will his bluffs work and are they bluffs?
Speaker 4: I don't know, Stay tuned, but think about think these
Speaker 4: things through. Just really consider, like, do are you prepared
Speaker 4: to have a war on your border? Like we haven't
Speaker 4: had that in our lifetimes.
Speaker 2: I haven't. I don't know about you.
Speaker 4: I don't remember there being a war with Mexico or
Speaker 4: Canada or Cuba in my lifetime. So this is a
Speaker 4: different thing than having a war in the Middle East
Speaker 4: or Ukraine or a proxy war elsewhere. This can get
Speaker 4: spicy fast, so think it through. He also signed in
Speaker 4: an executive order repealing all DEI programs across the federal government. Fantastic,
Speaker 4: Absolutely love that. I've already gone into detail about how
Speaker 4: evil and un American DEI is, so I'll spare you
Speaker 4: the lecture. We all, I think, are on the same
Speaker 4: page with that. He also signed an executive order securing
Speaker 4: the Southern border. I think that is the answer as
Speaker 4: opposed to going to war with the cartels. You probably
Speaker 4: ought to just secure the border, but you know, is
Speaker 4: what it is. He also signed an executive order granting
Speaker 4: TikTok an extension to sell to an American buyer. I
Speaker 4: am still not convinced that they ought to be forced,
Speaker 4: and I'm not sure that Supreme Court it's constitutional.
Speaker 2: But according to me and property.
Speaker 4: Rights, I don't understand the justification they did it undure
Speaker 4: national security threat purview. I'm not at all convinced that
Speaker 4: TikTok is a national security threat and then it's some
Speaker 4: propaganda tool from the c I think the arguments that
Speaker 4: you know, Timpoole and others have made in that regard
Speaker 4: are lacking, and I would love to go on IRL
Speaker 4: and debate this issue, but at some point I'm sure
Speaker 4: I will a reprieve, and finding a way to make
Speaker 4: this work is a good idea. Let me also emphasize
Speaker 4: one hundred and eighty million Americans use TikTok, and I
Speaker 4: don't know how many of them use it for business purposes,
Speaker 4: but it's not a small amount. And those that aren't
Speaker 4: even using it for business use it to get their
Speaker 4: message out there, and they value that tremendously. Again, let
Speaker 4: me repeat no conflict of interests here. I don't have
Speaker 4: a TikTok account. Okay, maybe I'll get one after this.
Speaker 4: I haven't thought about it, really, but there's a lot
Speaker 4: of value to the American people when it comes to
Speaker 4: that app like. There's a reason that people are so
Speaker 4: pissed off about it, and I respect that. I respect
Speaker 4: their their desire to be able to speak freely like
Speaker 4: I've I've poured so much time and energy into Twitter
Speaker 4: now x if it were to be banned by the
Speaker 4: government because they said, oh, Elon Musk is under the
Speaker 4: influence of a hostile government, which was one of the
Speaker 4: four or five that they listed, and they forced Elon
Speaker 4: to sell to Jack Dorsey, which then put it back
Speaker 4: under the purview of basically the deep state.
Speaker 2: That'd be hell, that'd be terrible for me.
Speaker 4: And if Elon then said you know what, I'm not
Speaker 4: going to sell and they just shut it down, well
Speaker 4: then I've now lost a multi hundred thousand dollars, if
Speaker 4: not multimillion dollar marketing vehicle, which is my Twitter account.
Speaker 4: So yeah, I feel for the people that use TikTok
Speaker 4: daily and I hope that I hope that this can
Speaker 4: be worked out.
Speaker 2: I really do. Next up, he signs an executive.
Speaker 4: Order creating or establishing DOGE Department of Governmental Efficiency. Will
Speaker 4: that be a real thing? I mean, it's a thing now,
Speaker 4: it's a real thing, but it's still an advisory board.
Speaker 4: It doesn't really have teeth. As best I can tell,
Speaker 4: it will be very interesting.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 4: I'm going to stay optimistic and just believe that they're
Speaker 4: going to get some things accomplished, but at this point,
Speaker 4: I don't know what it will amount to. I will
Speaker 4: say I was very saddened to see Vivek Ramaswami unceremoniously
Speaker 4: removed from that role. He was supposed to be a
Speaker 4: major participant. There's lots of conflicting reports about why he
Speaker 4: dropped out. It seems to me as if he's going
Speaker 4: to be running for the governor of Ohio, if not
Speaker 4: the Senate seat in Ohio. I'm not sure which he's
Speaker 4: going to do at this point, but it's quite obvious
Speaker 4: to me that his H one B stance was so unpopular,
Speaker 4: in part because of Sam Hyde's response and the incredible
Speaker 4: firestorm that was created around that debate topic, that he
Speaker 4: kind of screwed himself, like he just people.
Speaker 2: Were so mad. I've never seen anything like it.
Speaker 4: Like he went from almost like universally beloved to you know,
Speaker 4: like half of the people that loved him were just like,
Speaker 4: fuck you.
Speaker 2: It was wild.
Speaker 4: I feel terrible for him, because I liked the guy
Speaker 4: a lot, and I think that his heart's in the
Speaker 4: right place, and I don't think that he meant to
Speaker 4: be insulting, but clearly a lot of people felt insulted.
Speaker 4: And you know, this is American politics. You got to
Speaker 4: figure out a way to say it without blowing people up.
Speaker 4: But it's it's very interesting to me because at the
Speaker 4: end of the day, like Elon, also lost a lot
Speaker 4: of goodwill by the way. But Trump comes out and
Speaker 4: he basically says the same thing. He's like, He's like, yeah,
Speaker 4: we need to have the best people come here, and yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 4: And you know H one b's are important.
Speaker 3: There's been some debate within your orbit over whether or
Speaker 3: not to keep or eliminate H one b visas.
Speaker 2: What's your position on that. Do you want to keep
Speaker 2: H one b's.
Speaker 10: Or do you want to get Like I like both
Speaker 10: sides of the argument, But I also like very competent
Speaker 10: people coming into our country, even if that involves them
Speaker 10: training and helping other people that may not have the
Speaker 10: qualifications they do. But I don't want to stop. And
Speaker 10: I'm not just talking about engineers. I'm talking about people
Speaker 10: at all levels. We want competent people coming into our country.
Speaker 10: And HB one I know the program very well. I
Speaker 10: use the program matred D's wine. You know, experts, even waiters,
Speaker 10: high quality waiters. You you got to get the best. Now,
Speaker 10: then you go into people like Larry and he needs engineers,
Speaker 10: and Masa needs and this gentleman needs engineers like nobody's
Speaker 10: ever needed engineers, right, So we have to have the
Speaker 10: quality of people coming in now. By doing that, we're
Speaker 10: expanding businesses and that takes care of everybody. So I'm
Speaker 10: sort of on both sides of the argument. But what
Speaker 10: I really do feel is that we have to let
Speaker 10: really competent people, great people come into our country, and
Speaker 10: we do that through the H one program.
Speaker 4: And that was kind of what Elon and Vivik were
Speaker 4: saying it. But Vivike was saying it with a brown
Speaker 4: face and they're like, not you. You don't get to
Speaker 4: say this to us. I was like, all right, yeah,
Speaker 4: that's an interesting stance. But Trump says it, no Biggie,
Speaker 4: Vivek says it, and it's like you're dead to me.
Speaker 4: Lesson learned, I guess. Anyways.
Speaker 2: I think that the DOGE operation is another big part
Speaker 2: of the reason I supported Trump, and I hope that
Speaker 2: it becomes something very meaningful. We'll see.
Speaker 4: He then signs an executive order to withdraw from the
Speaker 4: World Health Organization. I think this is fantastic. It's another
Speaker 4: global organization that was involved in the pandemic.
Speaker 2: Wink.
Speaker 4: I despise everyone involved in the who Ted DROs and
Speaker 4: all these fucking lying scumbags.
Speaker 2: So glad to be out of that.
Speaker 4: He also signed an executive order protecting American women from
Speaker 4: the dangers of radical gender ideology, basically going after you know,
Speaker 4: transgender people in women's sports. Obviously, I don't think it's
Speaker 4: right for biological men to be in sports against biological girls.
Speaker 2: I think that's a terrible idea.
Speaker 4: However, we are we really to the point where we
Speaker 4: need the federal government to tell every state to not
Speaker 4: do that, And I'm like, maybe we are. That's so
Speaker 4: depressing to think about, Like they're not going to figure
Speaker 4: it out, Like this is terribly unjust. We really need
Speaker 4: the Feds to come in and tell you can't do that.
Speaker 4: So I don't know how I feel about that. I like,
Speaker 4: I think it's obviously federal overreach, but at the same time,
Speaker 4: like I do think it's the right thing to do,
Speaker 4: So I'm torn.
Speaker 2: Sorry.
Speaker 4: He also issued an executive order ending the catch and
Speaker 4: release policy, which I think was obviously absurd in the
Speaker 4: first place. If you're going to be having a border
Speaker 4: at all, you can't have a policy of catching and
Speaker 4: releasing everybody coming across it. That only incentivizes more and
Speaker 4: more people to come across it, which is what we
Speaker 4: saw to the tune of eleven million at minimum over
Speaker 4: the past four years. So yeah, that needed to stop.
Speaker 4: He also signed an executive order restoring restoring the remain
Speaker 4: in Mexico policy. We'll see if Mexico actually enforces it.
Speaker 4: The new president there, I think her name Shinebaum, which
Speaker 4: is a very interesting name for a Mexican president.
Speaker 2: She is.
Speaker 4: Going back and forth, playing hardball verbally, but maybe she
Speaker 4: will actually play ball with Trump ultimately. He also appealed
Speaker 4: the rule allowing gender troops to serve in the military the.
Speaker 2: Corner lives of TikTok.
Speaker 4: The text dollars were also funding full gender transitions for
Speaker 4: service members. If that's true, that's unbelievable to me. Look,
Speaker 4: I don't I'm not in the military. So I'll let
Speaker 4: soldiers speak for themselves as to whether or not they
Speaker 4: want to serve with transgender people. I'm of the opinion
Speaker 4: as a man that I wouldn't. I would probably not
Speaker 4: want to be serving on the front lines, at least
Speaker 4: with trans people or women because they couldn't carry me
Speaker 4: out of there. Most of them would struggle. I we
Speaker 4: over two hundred pounds, I'm six foot one. Like, only
Speaker 4: the most freakishly strong woman is going to be able
Speaker 4: to save me from going down on the on the
Speaker 4: front line. So like I think, rationally, yeah, probably not
Speaker 4: the best idea, not the best role for them to
Speaker 4: be in, just as most women would not be able
Speaker 4: to play in the NFL.
Speaker 2: Right. I know this is very.
Speaker 4: Very bold, chauvinistic, sexist things to say, but let's just
Speaker 4: be honest here. Should trans people not be able to
Speaker 4: be in the military at all, like even in service
Speaker 4: roles or like backup roles?
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 4: I don't know if a blanket rule is is you know,
Speaker 4: necessary here? But I think once again this just shows
Speaker 4: the pendulum swinging harder than it probably had to, so
Speaker 4: it is what it is.
Speaker 2: I think what was.
Speaker 4: Really interesting is he signs an executive order revoking the
Speaker 4: security clearance of the fifty one former intelligence officials who
Speaker 4: lied about Hunter Biden's laptop. Now, obviously I agree with this.
Speaker 4: These people are terrible and they lied to you through
Speaker 4: their fucking teeth about what was happening with that laptop
Speaker 4: as the FBI had it in their possession, and they
Speaker 4: just egregiously lied. They issued that letters that during the debate,
Speaker 4: Joe Biden could go up there and he could lie
Speaker 4: to the American people, saying fifty one intelligence officials say
Speaker 4: that the story is bullshit, So Donald Trump's a liar.
Speaker 4: In reality, we all knew, at least those in the
Speaker 4: independent media space knew, and those that listen to this
Speaker 4: knew that they were lying. That we knew that that
Speaker 4: laptop was real, and them bearing the story was just
Speaker 4: to help the Democrats win the White House, and it did.
Speaker 6: There are fifty former national intelligence folks who said that
Speaker 6: what this he's accusing me of is a Russian planet.
Speaker 6: They have said that this is has all the cap
Speaker 6: four five former heads of the CIA parties say what
Speaker 6: he's saying is a bunch of garbage. Nobody believes it
Speaker 6: except them his and his good friend Rudegie.
Speaker 4: Obviously, I agree with him removing the security claanses. What
Speaker 4: I don't agree with is if this is the end
Speaker 4: of the punishment for these folks, that is not enough.
Speaker 4: I mean, that is in my opinion, definitional election interference
Speaker 4: from federal employees no less, which some would argue is
Speaker 4: treeson his behavior. So you got to do something other
Speaker 4: than just stripping them of their security clanses. Like that's
Speaker 4: not nearly adequate enough, but it's a start. It's a
Speaker 4: step in the right direction.
Speaker 2: We'll see.
Speaker 4: This is more performative nonsense, and I don't really understand
Speaker 4: the rationale for it.
Speaker 2: I guess I could theorize some things.
Speaker 4: But Donald Trump also issued an EO claiming or renaming
Speaker 4: the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America. Here's
Speaker 4: my assumption. One, he's trying to, you know, just have
Speaker 4: anything to put on his resume as like being an
Speaker 4: important press. There's always the ego aspect of anything Donald
Speaker 4: Trump does. I think there's also the argument that he's
Speaker 4: trying to claim it as property and justify further control
Speaker 4: of deep sea drilling for oil and gas. That would
Speaker 4: be kind of my more sinister expectation as to why
Speaker 4: this distinction might being made. But I think at the
Speaker 4: end of the day, like there's probably already contract law
Speaker 4: that's in place for this, So can you just like,
Speaker 4: can we just claim Mexico is now named South United
Speaker 4: States and we now control it like, no, so is
Speaker 4: there anything? Is there any teeth to this change? And
Speaker 4: I'm guessing not so. It seems just like performative virtue signaling,
Speaker 4: but like in a nationalistic pro America sense, it's very
Speaker 4: it's very strange, very strange. And last but not least,
Speaker 4: and maybe my favorite, he put a ninety day pause
Speaker 4: on all foreign eight all foreign eight, that's what the
Speaker 4: initial executive order said. And then I find out that
Speaker 4: there's a little cutout, little caveat for friends over in Israel, Like,
Speaker 4: you gotta be fucking kidding me, man, Like he does
Speaker 4: so much. Like everything that happens, they do so much
Speaker 4: to add to the conspiracy theorist or like the anti
Speaker 4: Semitic worldview of like we're doing everything at the best Israel.
Speaker 4: And then you have some evidence like this, and you're like,
Speaker 4: what am I supposed to say about this? What the
Speaker 4: fuck am I supposed to say about this? And keep
Speaker 4: in mind, we give aid to fucking everybody. We're sending
Speaker 4: billions here, billions there, Like almost everybody in the Middle
Speaker 4: East gets a little fucking chunk of change from us.
Speaker 4: And sometimes it's not so little billions. Usually it's just nuts.
Speaker 4: It's nuts. Look, I can't blame the graper audience that goes.
Speaker 2: Ah, look at this, This is proof.
Speaker 4: Like what am I supposed to fucking say to defend
Speaker 4: against that? Yeah, you're making a singular cutout for one nation. Well,
Speaker 4: you put a freeze on aid to all other countries. Anyways,
Speaker 4: my point would be doesn't go far enough. It ought
Speaker 4: to be not a ninety day freeze. It ought to
Speaker 4: be a four year freeze to everybody, including our greatest ally,
Speaker 4: no foreign aid. We're thirty seven trillion dollars in debt.
Speaker 4: We can't fucking afford it. We're not doing this anymore.
Speaker 4: We're done. Okay, That would be a step in the
Speaker 4: right direction. I think that overall, Donald Trump had a
Speaker 4: very good first day. I'm very nervous about his actions
Speaker 4: declaring drug cartels as terrorist organizations because I think that
Speaker 4: is just a methodology to circumvent normal protocols when it
Speaker 4: comes to using extraordinary violence that would normally be classified
Speaker 4: as war against our neighbor Mexico. So that is probably
Speaker 4: the thing I disagreed with him most on. I think
Speaker 4: the other things were kind of marginal, not huge changes,
Speaker 4: But I think overall he delivered on the vast majority
Speaker 4: of his promises. And I think that if if ross
Speaker 4: all Brick gets to go home tomorrow, which I think
Speaker 4: he will, he will have delivered on his promises to
Speaker 4: libertarians as well. So all in all, not so bad.
Speaker 2: I think.
Speaker 4: You know, there's another controversy with Elon who's flashing a
Speaker 4: Roman salute during the fucking like inauguration speeches.
Speaker 2: Afterwards. My heart goes out to you, and I'm just
Speaker 2: it's a big story. I could show you the corporate media,
Speaker 2: you know, saying this guy, he's showing you his true colors.
Speaker 2: Actually he's a fascist.
Speaker 4: Couldn't even wait one hour after Trump gets inaugurated to
Speaker 4: be throwing Nazi salutes around. It's like, look, I honestly
Speaker 4: believe and if I thought for a second that he
Speaker 4: was in fact some secret Nazi, I would say it.
Speaker 4: I would absolutely say, I think that Elon Musk has
Speaker 4: high functioning autism, and when he gets over stimulated, he
Speaker 4: does weird shit. And I know you're gonna say, oh,
Speaker 4: you're just carrying water for the guy. There's no evidence.
Speaker 4: What kind of Nazi argues in favor of h one
Speaker 4: bes which what kind of Nazi puts on the hat
Speaker 4: and go. It was to Israel with Ben Shapiro. He's
Speaker 4: a fucking pretty bad Nazi if so, right, So what
Speaker 4: are we arguing here? But corporate media is still gonna
Speaker 4: argue it. I think he spased out. That's my honest opinion.
Speaker 4: I think he's spassed out. And as a libertarian who
Speaker 4: knows lots of autist, uh not the first time I've
Speaker 4: seen someone spaz out and do some weird shit.
Speaker 2: So that's my thesis.
Speaker 4: Oh, by the way, when he did it, he also said, uh,
Speaker 4: I'm throwing my love to you, So he tried to
Speaker 4: explain the motion that he was making, but I'm not
Speaker 4: gonna lie. It was funny as hell and he definitely
Speaker 4: looked like idiot doing it.
Speaker 12: So, oh God, and if you vote for me on
Speaker 12: day one, I will commute the sentence of Ross Olbrick,
Speaker 12: who is sentence of time, sir.
Speaker 4: So, about nine months ago, I was sitting there, I
Speaker 4: don't know, eighth row or something like that, dead center
Speaker 4: right there, and uh I I can't believe it happened.
Speaker 4: So here's the advent of doing tape delayed stuff. I
Speaker 4: got as soon as I was done recording, I then
Speaker 4: went back to Twitter and I checked and sure, shit,
Speaker 4: he announced it. This is what Donald Trump posted. He says,
Speaker 4: I just called the mother of Ross William Albrett. He
Speaker 4: misspelled his name, but whatever, to let her know that
Speaker 4: in honor of her and the libertarian movement which supported
Speaker 4: me so strongly, it was my pleasure to have just
Speaker 4: signed a full and unconditional pardon of her son Ross.
Speaker 4: The scum that worked to convict him were some of
Speaker 4: the same lunatics who were involved in the modern day
Speaker 4: weaponization of government against me. He was given two life
Speaker 4: sentences plus forty years. Ridiculous. Yes, President Trump, it is ridiculous,
Speaker 4: and man, as you can telap and cry, I can't
Speaker 4: hide it. I can't lie about it. So I just
Speaker 4: texted Lynn, I'm thrilled beyond words that this lady, this
Speaker 4: lady who I've I've now met and spent time with
Speaker 4: I don't know a dozen times, a dozen different events.
Speaker 4: She is such a nice person, and she fought so
Speaker 4: tirelessly for her son. She puts all parents to shame
Speaker 4: in terms of just her indomitable will just and she's
Speaker 4: so nice. You would never suspect someone to be so nice.
Speaker 4: And you have such a fighter and just all of
Speaker 4: her kindness belies this incredible, burning drive to get her
Speaker 4: fucking son out of prison. She's a fucking hero man.
Speaker 4: She is just I don't want to cry again, but
Speaker 4: my god, what an incredible human being. And uh, all right,
Speaker 4: not gonna cry again. Thank you, President Trump. Not gonna cry.
Speaker 4: Thank you President Trump for keeping your promise. A lot
Speaker 4: of people didn't believe it. A lot a lot of
Speaker 4: people didn't believe it, and he delivered. So I can't
Speaker 4: believe him granding. And again, I just if you knew her,
Speaker 4: trust me, if you knew her, you'd understand why this
Speaker 4: is so special to me. I just there's not a
Speaker 4: person on the planet that deserves this victory more than
Speaker 4: Lynn Albricht. She's such a fucking awesome human being and
Speaker 4: she's such a fighter, and I gotta give I gotta
Speaker 4: just take a second to thank Angela mccartal, you know,
Speaker 4: for her to have put her reputation on the line
Speaker 4: the way she did. Sure, Dave and I did too,
Speaker 4: But like she was in a position of authority within
Speaker 4: the Libertarian Party and she negotiated this deal when you know,
Speaker 4: she could have lost her chair position, she could have
Speaker 4: been sued or who knows what you know, she was
Speaker 4: ultimately risking and doing this. Uh and and so many
Speaker 4: people doubted her, so many people, and she demonstrated the
Speaker 4: same will that Lynn did. Just unbelievable fight and courage.
Speaker 2: Mmmm.
Speaker 4: It's very inspirational. Very he gets to go home. I
Speaker 4: never thought i'd see it. Oh man, Wow, I've never
Speaker 4: I've never felt as if, you know, activism could actually
Speaker 4: change the world. And you can say it's minor and
Speaker 4: some you know, if you want to go to the
Speaker 4: full macro analysis, yes it's minor. It's one man freed,
Speaker 4: it's one family restored. You're right, it's minor, but it's
Speaker 4: not to them. To them, it's everything.
Speaker 2: To Lynn.
Speaker 4: It was her whole world. And I'm just so I'm
Speaker 4: just so overwhelmed to everyone that believed, to everyone that fought.
Speaker 4: Thank you you made the world just a little bit better.
Speaker 4: The third time crying on Liberdy locked down. God damn it.
Speaker 4: I hate it when I do this, but it's uh,
Speaker 4: you know, it's real. These are my real emotions.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 4: I love this lady and I can't imagine that her
Speaker 4: son's not a great person after knowing her, as you know,
Speaker 4: as long as I have and as much time as
Speaker 4: I've spent with her, She's just such a gem.
Speaker 2: She's such a gem, you know what.
Speaker 4: And even if Ross is a comeback, she still deserves
Speaker 4: to have her son bag and he deserves a second
Speaker 4: shot at life. And I'm gonna be rooting for them,
Speaker 4: and I'm not going to be inviting them on my podcast.
Speaker 4: Is not a clout chasing thing. I'm not trying to
Speaker 4: do that. I just wanted her to have her son back,
Speaker 4: and she does in the next twenty four hours.
Speaker 2: She will get to hug her boy. That's beautiful. Love
Speaker 2: you guys. Bye.
Speaker 4: Anyways, thank you guys so much for tuning in. As always,
Speaker 4: I hope you enjoyed this episode. I hope you found
Speaker 4: it informative. I will be back with you guys again
Speaker 4: here shortly. Thank you so much for tuning into episode
Speaker 4: four hundred of Liberty Lockdown. I was going to have
Speaker 4: a special guest on today, but I decided to save
Speaker 4: them for a future episode.
Speaker 2: I had a lot to talk about.
Speaker 4: I don't really need a guess when I have a
Speaker 4: lot to talk about, So we're gonna ride solo. If
Speaker 4: you guys enjoyed it, do, hit the like button, subscribe,
Speaker 4: share it around, leave five star reviews on Apple podcasts
Speaker 4: and Spotify or wherever you listen and wherever you're watching,
Speaker 4: hit the like button and subscribe and hugging, kiss your mother.
Speaker 4: Tell your father that you appreciate everything he did for you,
Speaker 4: if you're still in your life. And yeah, be good
Speaker 4: to your kids if you have kids.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 4: I never get to say that one because I don't
Speaker 4: have kids yet, So you'd be good to your kids.
Speaker 4: And yeah, if you're lucky enough to have your grandparents,
Speaker 4: call them right now and tell them you love them
Speaker 4: so much and it'll mean a lot. And yeah, just
Speaker 4: have a good life. I don't know why I'm in
Speaker 4: such a good mood. It's not like I got anything,
Speaker 4: you know, kintaclysmic life changing over the past forty eight hours.
Speaker 4: But I'm feeling good today. So I hope you guys
Speaker 4: are too. Appreciate you see you soon.
Speaker 2: Peace.
Speaker 10: I will commute the sentence of Ross Albright a.
Speaker 2: Welcome to liberty.
Speaker 4: Lockdown, pleas go, your plot called deliberty ain't come, but yeah,
Speaker 4: it's on all of pretty to come from.
Speaker 12: And where did he go