Speaker 1: You're listening to KFI AM six forty the Bill Handles
Speaker 1: show on demand on the iHeartRadio f It is a
Speaker 1: Tuesday Morning Taco Tuesday, January twenty eighth. One of the
Speaker 1: stories recovering a lot of them this morning is the
Speaker 1: Gulf of Mexico is no longer the Gulf of Mexico.
Speaker 1: Google is changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico
Speaker 1: to the Gulf of America after President Trump ordered that
Speaker 1: the golf being named Gulf of America. He also said
Speaker 1: that Mount McKinley, which used to Bednali, and that was
Speaker 1: the name of that of the mountain in that area
Speaker 1: for hundreds of years. That became Mount McKinley in nineteen fifteen.
Speaker 1: That's going back to Mount McKinley again in honor of
Speaker 1: President McKinley, William McKinley. In the meantime, do you mamer
Speaker 1: what happened with Cape Canaveral. Cape Canaveral became Cape Kennedy
Speaker 1: and then went back to Cape Canaveral. And why is that?
Speaker 1: Because it was Cape Canaveral for hundreds of years. By
Speaker 1: the way, you know, when Gulf of Mexico became the
Speaker 1: Gulf of Mexico about four hundred years ago, and now
Speaker 1: it's the Gulf of America. Yeah, you know, I'm okay
Speaker 1: for change, but you know, at certain points you go please,
Speaker 1: you know, you know, really all right, getting a lot
Speaker 1: more serious in terms of who's going to be to
Speaker 1: blame for the Eaton fire and is it going to
Speaker 1: be Southern California? Edison, the transmission lines. We're going to
Speaker 1: relive that story of transmission lines. There is a video
Speaker 1: that show flashes of blue and white light flaring near
Speaker 1: that equipment and then the hillside explodes into flames. Is
Speaker 1: that Edison that caused that? Edis then of course says nope, nope, nope,
Speaker 1: we had nothing to do with it. Well, Sunday, one
Speaker 1: of the law firms suing Edison released an edited video
Speaker 1: shows this blue arcing in the canyon. It's take about
Speaker 1: a mile away from a security camera, and it shows
Speaker 1: the suspected ignition point of the fire, strong winds whipping
Speaker 1: through the area, the flashing on the dark hill side,
Speaker 1: and then the lights flash into or so they say,
Speaker 1: into this fire. Okay. Right after that, the hillside begins
Speaker 1: to burn. As I said, a spokesperson for Edison said,
Speaker 1: hang on a minute, before we start throwing blame around.
Speaker 1: Let's look at all the evidence. It has to be
Speaker 1: completed before a cause of the fire could be determined.
Speaker 1: By the way they're right, I mean, do we just
Speaker 1: don't do we not investigate? Do we just say okay,
Speaker 1: here it is no we have to investigate, and of
Speaker 1: course evident as Edison officials, surprising has surprisingly have said,
Speaker 1: we don't believe our electrical equipment was responsible and early inspections,
Speaker 1: Our early inspections of the equipment shows no signs of
Speaker 1: arcing or power anomalies. No one knows what caused the fire.
Speaker 1: Edison says, well, it's being investigated by the California Department
Speaker 1: of Forestry and Fire Protection. They're not going to comment
Speaker 1: on on it other than we're investigating. Now Here is
Speaker 1: one of the interesting side stories about this, and we're
Speaker 1: going to hear a lot more. Edison previously had said
Speaker 1: that the distribution lines in that area immediately west of
Speaker 1: Eaton Canyon were de energized well before the fire started. Therefore,
Speaker 1: our power lines could not have started those because there
Speaker 1: was no energy in there. However, the company said that
Speaker 1: transmission lines on the east side of the canyon remained powered,
Speaker 1: and the chief executive of Edison also said the winds
Speaker 1: were not strong enough to merit de energizing that electrical
Speaker 1: transmission line. So wait a minute, the line where the
Speaker 1: fire started was not de energized, and the lines or
Speaker 1: was ya was not degenerized, but degenerate, degenerate, d genericize.
Speaker 1: God that I did that energization. You know, I do that,
Speaker 1: and it drives me completely nuts. You know, you can
Speaker 1: tell that English is not my first language, Honest to God.
Speaker 1: There are times they go, Bill, you don't speak English.
Speaker 1: I go, yeah, Now, you know English is my second language. Anyway,
Speaker 1: was it de energized? Right? Winds have to be sixty
Speaker 1: to eighty miles per hour for the company to consider
Speaker 1: de energizing those lines, And the readings of Edison show
Speaker 1: that they were lower than that. They didn't hit sixty
Speaker 1: miles an hour. They hit fifty nine miles an hour.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, Well you got to draw the line somewhere,
Speaker 1: you know, at some point you say no. So the
Speaker 1: National Weather Service records the fifty nine mile per hour
Speaker 1: at the monitoring site there. Now, last week Edison, the
Speaker 1: attorney said, wait a minute, we also show an encampment
Speaker 1: about three hundred yards downhill from the suspected ignition point. Well,
Speaker 1: the attorney suing Edison says, that's right, three hundred yards down.
Speaker 1: Do you think that matters at all? You've got a
Speaker 1: bunch of homeless people, and three hundred yards away there's
Speaker 1: a fire that explodes. I mean, what do I think
Speaker 1: happened there? It's getting really very testy between everybody, as
Speaker 1: you could imagine. Attorneys suing the company have asked the
Speaker 1: judge to order the company to preserve data and equipment.
Speaker 1: This happens all the time. That's not to say that
Speaker 1: Edison is not preserving the data. I don't even know
Speaker 1: why they asked that, because everybody preserves the data. Although
Speaker 1: Edison attorneys oppose that motion. Wait a minute, they oppose
Speaker 1: the motion which asked them to preserve the data, but
Speaker 1: they already are preserving the data. Why would they oppose
Speaker 1: the motion? Just say okay, I don't care. It's like
Speaker 1: a restraining order. I talk about that all the time.
Speaker 1: I get asked on handle on the law. I've got
Speaker 1: a restraining order against me. I'm not allowed to visit
Speaker 1: my ex wife. I go, where do you live? About
Speaker 1: four hundred miles away from my ex wife. What do
Speaker 1: you care? Do you ever plan on seeing her again? No,
Speaker 1: what do you care? Are you going to fight that
Speaker 1: restraining order? That's what's happening here now. Much of the
Speaker 1: cost of this fire, incidentally, could be absorbed by the
Speaker 1: state's wildfire fund. But if Edison gets nailed for this,
Speaker 1: and we're talking about damages in the billions of dollars here, Edison,
Speaker 1: by the way, doesn't have a good record with liability.
Speaker 1: Remember the Creek fire in twenty seventeen the Angelus National Forests, Well,
Speaker 1: they fought it and fought it and fought it, saying
Speaker 1: it's not our fault, it's not our fault. Last year,
Speaker 1: a federal investigator with the US Forest Service made its determination, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it was your fault after gaining access to Edison's data
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty two. Here's what the federal complaint was.
Speaker 1: Here's the language of the federal complaint against Edison in
Speaker 1: the Creek fire back in twenty seventeen southern California. Edison
Speaker 1: breached its duty of care and was negligent in causing
Speaker 1: the Creek fire, including its failure to construct, maintain, and
Speaker 1: operate its power lines and equipment in a safe and
Speaker 1: effective working order. All right? Is that going to be
Speaker 1: brought into court. It's a civil trial, it's not a
Speaker 1: criminal trial. But still I don't think it's looking good
Speaker 1: for Edison personally. But you gotta wait, you know, we
Speaker 1: have to wait until the investigation is over. Although what
Speaker 1: was it? The creek fire took five years before anybody
Speaker 1: figured it out, all right? Coming up a story about
Speaker 1: the fires. Remember I talked about private firefighting. You could
Speaker 1: hire your own fire department firefighters. There's another spin on
Speaker 1: that that I want to share with you that I'll
Speaker 1: let you you haven't thought about. And that's coming right up.
Speaker 2: You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM
Speaker 2: six forty.
Speaker 1: A couple of stories. We're looking at the Gulf of
Speaker 1: Mexico is now the Gulf of America, as President Trump
Speaker 1: has indicated and said, and Google says, okay, we're changing
Speaker 1: the name of the golf to the Gulf of America.
Speaker 1: And now there's a move to call the United States
Speaker 1: itself Trump Land, and we'll see how far that goes.
Speaker 1: It's like Disneyland, I told you, and I've talked about
Speaker 1: private firefighters. You can actually hire private firefighters, and it's
Speaker 1: like almost like security. Private security comes out to your
Speaker 1: home or business or these communities and they have nothing
Speaker 1: to do with the cops. But they come out and
Speaker 1: they patrol and some are armed in armed security for
Speaker 1: many buildings. Well, we talked about private firefighters. You can
Speaker 1: hire private firefighters, and that seems to be a thing.
Speaker 1: How about this one, Now, private fire hydrants. You can
Speaker 1: put in your own fire hydrant. Wait a minute, how
Speaker 1: do you do that? Well, there's a story in the
Speaker 1: La Times about this lawyer, Cassandra Rieira, and she soaked
Speaker 1: the plants in her yard, She moved flammable patio dure inside,
Speaker 1: did all the stuff you're supposed to do, and then
Speaker 1: hooked up her private fire hydrant to two long hoses
Speaker 1: she left coiled on the ground. Years ago, she spend
Speaker 1: thirteen hundred dollars on a personal hydrant system and an
Speaker 1: additional thousand bucks for a plumber to install it at
Speaker 1: the recommendation of local fire department. Why because her side
Speaker 1: of the street didn't have a public hydrant. This isn't
Speaker 1: about replacing hydrants when there are no hydrants. This is
Speaker 1: when the hydrant is down the street. And far away.
Speaker 1: If there's a hydrant right next to you, well you
Speaker 1: should be okay. And if the hydrant runs out of water,
Speaker 1: do you still get municipal water sometimes? And what this
Speaker 1: is about is hooking up to your home sprinkler system,
Speaker 1: home water system, and it turns it into a fire hose.
Speaker 1: Now not the kind you see the fireman use, but
Speaker 1: it's an inch and a half. It pressurizes the water
Speaker 1: with its system, and all of a sudden, you don't
Speaker 1: have just a garden hose. You have this inch and
Speaker 1: a half high pressure water that's going out. Not bad,
Speaker 1: I mean it sure helps. It's a form of preparedness.
Speaker 1: Companies are selling these way less expensive than having a
Speaker 1: dedicated firefighting crew down the street. Are paying for private firefighters,
Speaker 1: and customers purchase what they need hoses, nozzles, valves, adapters,
Speaker 1: and very simply, it increases the water flow rate from
Speaker 1: the outdoor faucet that supplies water to the house, and
Speaker 1: I mean increases it dramatically. And they're legal. Private hydrants
Speaker 1: are perfectly legal now owners are responsible for maintaining them.
Speaker 1: They have to pay for the water they use, just
Speaker 1: like anything else. It's right off the meter. The guy
Speaker 1: who sells these, President of Brush Fire Battle System says,
Speaker 1: it's your water, it's behind your meter. And by the way,
Speaker 1: we began selling these private fire hydrants three years ago.
Speaker 1: Are there some rules. They have to be painted red,
Speaker 1: for example, they can't be yellow. That's one thing. So
Speaker 1: the fire department knows immediately this is a private fire hydrant,
Speaker 1: all right, that's La County. They have to be a
Speaker 1: painted red. And there is a twenty twenty three LA
Speaker 1: City Fire Code that says any action or project permit
Speaker 1: is required to install. So you got to hit a
Speaker 1: permit in La in the city of Los Angeles, and
Speaker 1: private hydrants are going to be used and are being
Speaker 1: used and being bought by homeowners all over the place.
Speaker 1: Now the experts are saying, you don't actually want to
Speaker 1: fight the fire yourself. You want to leave that the
Speaker 1: professional firefighters, so you don't actually pick up the hose
Speaker 1: and fight the fire. Come on, if there isn't a
Speaker 1: firefighter anywhere near. If you look at the Palisades fire,
Speaker 1: how much of that was left alone. There simply weren't
Speaker 1: enough firefighting trucks. There simply wasn't enough equipment. Of course,
Speaker 1: people that had these were using them to save their homes.
Speaker 1: And the problem is that was a gamble. Do you stay?
Speaker 1: I don't know. If it's putting out spotfires when the
Speaker 1: embers come down, yeah, if the fire is roaring to
Speaker 1: towards you at eighty miles an hour, maybe not. But
Speaker 1: they're quickly becoming the top requested amenity among wealthy home buyers.
Speaker 1: And since they're only one thousand dollars fifteen hundred dollars
Speaker 1: to install, that's not asking too much. Man. I would
Speaker 1: put one in in a heartbeat. Matter of fact. You know,
Speaker 1: I have a new home. I think I'm putting one in.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna paint it fusia or rainbow color. So I
Speaker 1: don't want to go into that. There's a whole political
Speaker 1: thing about that. All right, We're done with that. Coming up?
Speaker 1: What is deep Seek? Oh? Has that turned the stock
Speaker 1: market around? And if you haven't heard what deep Seek is,
Speaker 1: it's a big one and that I'll share with you.
Speaker 1: Coming up.
Speaker 2: You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM
Speaker 2: six forty.
Speaker 1: Oh. Do we have a story of financial story to
Speaker 1: talk about? There's a company called Deep Seek. No, it
Speaker 1: is not an adult film company or a distribution company.
Speaker 1: It is a computer company. And what is it about.
Speaker 1: It's about artificial intelligence. Okay, big deal. Oh, it is
Speaker 1: a big deal for a couple of reasons. It's Chinese.
Speaker 1: It's a Chinese tech startup. Yesterday the stock markets were
Speaker 1: just decimated by the news. And not only as a
Speaker 1: tech technical aspect to it in terms of the cost
Speaker 1: of AI, because it's an AI, it's an AI program.
Speaker 1: But also it has a massive political component because this
Speaker 1: has to do with the US and China developing AI technology. Now,
Speaker 1: the US government and many tech firms are well simply
Speaker 1: scared of China. We have to keep ahead of China technologically,
Speaker 1: and in many cases the government will not let certain
Speaker 1: chips be sold to the Chinese because of their ability to,
Speaker 1: for example, deal with AI, because the government says, we
Speaker 1: have to keep the US on top of this. Wooh.
Speaker 1: Also it pulls into question the huge amounts of money
Speaker 1: tech companies say they plan on spending on data centers
Speaker 1: and computer chips for AI. AI power is enormous. In
Speaker 1: order to power AI technology, tons of money has to
Speaker 1: be spent. Navidia, I mean, that's the biggest chip maker
Speaker 1: of this. These AI chips demand unbelievable amounts of money
Speaker 1: and they're hideously expensive. So what did Deep Seek do Well?
Speaker 1: It was founded by a Chinese guy in twenty twenty three.
Speaker 1: He co founded one of China's top hedge funds, and
Speaker 1: then he got into this manufacturing of this AI technology.
Speaker 1: I mean this seemed like a bright guy. Yeah, like
Speaker 1: unbelievable in terms of tech. Oh, by the way, he's
Speaker 1: only twelve years old. I'm just kidding. It's just all
Speaker 1: these new billionaires are twelve or fifteen years old. Anyway.
Speaker 1: What it does is it uses Navidia's chips but lower
Speaker 1: power allowed to be sold to China, and it bought
Speaker 1: about ten thousand of these A one hundred graphics processor
Speaker 1: chips that are used to build and run its AI systems.
Speaker 1: They can do it for far less money. They can
Speaker 1: do it to run it far less power, and it's
Speaker 1: as good as what America is producing, which is costing
Speaker 1: in the billions of dollars to develop. I think they
Speaker 1: started up with a five and a half million dollars
Speaker 1: startup fund and they pulled this off. I mean, this
Speaker 1: is peanuts and now everybody is sweating bullets. I mean,
Speaker 1: the market reacted it was the biggest one day fall
Speaker 1: in tech stocks, and the history of the market in
Speaker 1: Vidio's fall was just astronomical against a little bit. Today,
Speaker 1: its recent models are built with the lower performing chips
Speaker 1: not banned in China, so you don't need the fancies.
Speaker 1: Hardware may not be needed, isn't needed for cutting edge
Speaker 1: AI research, and it's supposed to be as good ass man.
Speaker 1: That is scaring everybody investors in AI technology, and I
Speaker 1: mean by the billions and billions of dollars Google Amazon,
Speaker 1: and all of a sudden, they can turn around and go, wait,
Speaker 1: that's fine, they did this for five and a half
Speaker 1: million dollars. What's what the hell's going on? And of
Speaker 1: course the geopolitical angle of this, all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: China is developing a technology in what we in the
Speaker 1: United States consider the future our technological advantage and all
Speaker 1: of a sudden is gone. And the politicos read the
Speaker 1: Trump administration is sweating bullets wide because of what are
Speaker 1: one of the primary primary points of the Trump administration
Speaker 1: running for office, Because we're enemies with China. We are enemies.
Speaker 1: We haven't gone to war, but we are in a
Speaker 1: trade war, and we can't let him have our technology. Well,
Speaker 1: guess what, they don't need our technology. They have their
Speaker 1: own and it doesn't cost them jack. Now the President
Speaker 1: has gone from we cannot let China have any advantage
Speaker 1: over us to saying yesterday to House Republicans in Miami
Speaker 1: that this news is positive and that means you won't
Speaker 1: be spending as much and you're gonna get the same result.
Speaker 1: And he called the development a wake up call for
Speaker 1: our industries that we need to be laser focused on
Speaker 1: competing to win. By the way, do you know how
Speaker 1: much money was spent by Open Ai, Oracle, and soft
Speaker 1: Bank on AI technology. It's gonna be about five hundred
Speaker 1: billion dollars half a trillion dollars. Yeah, they did it,
Speaker 1: it's being reported with five and a half million. They
Speaker 1: were able to pull this off using chips that you
Speaker 1: buy at your local computer store, You go online, you
Speaker 1: go on Amazon, you buy a reasonably low cost chip,
Speaker 1: a gaming chip, and you can pull this off, or
Speaker 1: at least the Chinese have done it. I mean, it
Speaker 1: is just incredible what they've been able to do. And
Speaker 1: I tell you they are well, this guy is unbelievable.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's going to be one of the pioneers,
Speaker 1: one of the visionaries. I'll tell you that. Okay, we're
Speaker 1: done with that. Now, let's talk about how if you
Speaker 1: have a kid and you have a caregiver, probably illegal,
Speaker 1: I mean that's the way it normally goes. I have
Speaker 1: a little story for you that I want to share. Then,
Speaker 1: what's going on with this crackdown? Well, you're going to
Speaker 1: be affected big time and caregivers through the years. I mean,
Speaker 1: you're going to get old, You're going to need your
Speaker 1: diapers changed. It's that simple. And who's going to do it?
Speaker 1: That is the story coming up. Aha, diaper changing story
Speaker 1: just for you.
Speaker 2: You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM
Speaker 2: six forty.
Speaker 1: The President has signed four executive orders going to reshape
Speaker 1: the military, banning transgender troops from serving, getting rid of
Speaker 1: the military DEI programs, reinstating service members with pay back
Speaker 1: pay who refuse to get a COVID vaccination, and the
Speaker 1: Golf of Mexico is no longer the Golf of Mexico.
Speaker 1: It is now the Gulf of America. And okay, you know,
Speaker 1: some big changes are afoot, some big changes that we've
Speaker 1: been reporting on that unless you live under a rock
Speaker 1: you have been seeing, and that is this immigration crackdown,
Speaker 1: and I mean immigration crackdown. They are picking up the
Speaker 1: federal government is picking up illegal immigrants by the bus load.
Speaker 1: And Trump pet promise and has kept this promise that
Speaker 1: illegal immigration will not be tolerated. I'm going to this
Speaker 1: is Trump speaking to port eleven million illegal immigrants. Now,
Speaker 1: is he gonna do that? Of course that first he
Speaker 1: is going after the bad guys, and that seems to
Speaker 1: be happening. And here is the problem. Now, let's look
Speaker 1: at the non bad guys. Okay, people who work in healthcare.
Speaker 1: Like my mother, she didn't work in healthcare. She had
Speaker 1: people take care of her. Now, one of the aspects
Speaker 1: about illegal immigration, as many Americans say, if illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: were thrown out of this country, then we would have jobs.
Speaker 1: They are taking away our jobs. I don't know anybody
Speaker 1: who is out there picking strawberries who is white, no idea.
Speaker 1: I don't know anybody who's a caregiver. Caregivers are either
Speaker 1: at home or in their own facilities, and they take
Speaker 1: care of elderly people for the most part. Now, according
Speaker 1: to the Kaiser Foundation, they're saying twenty eight percent of
Speaker 1: the workers who cared directly for people in nursing homes
Speaker 1: and other forms of long term care are illegal immigrants.
Speaker 1: I don't buy that for a second. I think it
Speaker 1: is far far higher than that, because as my mother
Speaker 1: was in various facilities and she deteriorated, so I was
Speaker 1: giving her more and more care. She as I've shared
Speaker 1: with you before, she died at the age of ninety eight.
Speaker 1: She should have died at the age of ninety three
Speaker 1: because by the age of nine three she no longer
Speaker 1: knew who I was, who anybody was, and I was
Speaker 1: spending a lot of money caring for her. Should have
Speaker 1: put her on the just parked her on the sidewalk.
Speaker 1: She wouldn't have known the difference. And all the caregivers
Speaker 1: in the various facilities she was at were Hispanic or Filipino. Also,
Speaker 1: by the way, in many cases illegal immigrants and so
Speaker 1: as more and more are deported, and we're going to
Speaker 1: see not just the bad guys, but they're going to
Speaker 1: raid facilities. Are they going to raid healthcare? They're going
Speaker 1: to raid nursing homes. Who the hell knows? And well,
Speaker 1: a friend of mine who is a contractor, who's now
Speaker 1: a friend the contractor who was remodeled my house. As
Speaker 1: you know, I bought a house and I remodeled it.
Speaker 1: And he was saying, and Polo goes to home Depot
Speaker 1: and Low's to pick up supplies that he needs that
Speaker 1: he doesn't order, and he walked in there. He was
Speaker 1: telling me that there used to be people that were
Speaker 1: in the driveways, you know, the entrances of the stores,
Speaker 1: and they were Hispanic and virtually all of them being
Speaker 1: illegal because they worked casual labor. You go into a
Speaker 1: home depot or a Lows today, that parking lot is empty.
Speaker 1: There is no one there to help you none. Now
Speaker 1: are they going to raid parking lots? The government going
Speaker 1: to raid the entrances to these massive big home store
Speaker 1: they store DIY stores. Who the hell knows, They're already
Speaker 1: raiding factories. We know that. I guess the next step
Speaker 1: is where illegal migrants congregate. The next step is probably
Speaker 1: going to be nursing homes where the huge majority of
Speaker 1: the workers are illegal migrants. And it's going to be
Speaker 1: tough because we're getting older and old, we are aging.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact. According to the National Center
Speaker 1: for Health Workforce Analysis, by twenty thirty, a quarter of
Speaker 1: California's population will be at least sixty years old. I'll
Speaker 1: be a lot older than that. And demand for home healthcare, aids,
Speaker 1: nursing assistants' personal care is going to go up, up, up, up,
Speaker 1: And there aren't enough people. There won't be enough people.
Speaker 1: And why well, because illegal migrants are the majority of
Speaker 1: the people that work there. Pay is very low. Changing
Speaker 1: diapers is not the best work in the world. Cleaning
Speaker 1: people up, giving them baths, it's no fun. And I
Speaker 1: don't buy the fact that they're taking away our jobs.
Speaker 1: I mean they're not. They're the only ones that are
Speaker 1: doing that job for the most part. So that's the
Speaker 1: other side of it. You know, do we dislike illegal
Speaker 1: immigrants in this country? Yes, we do. This is how
Speaker 1: Trump won, This is how Trump is now the president
Speaker 1: because he just pegged the feeling. I mean, he grabbed it.
Speaker 1: Democrats completely screwed the pooch. Did not understand the strong,
Speaker 1: strong feelings that the American populace has about illegal immigration. Now,
Speaker 1: are they all rapists and murderers? No? Are they taking
Speaker 1: American jobs? Not for the most part, I don't buy that.
Speaker 1: But are they violating the law? Are they're invading our country.
Speaker 1: Is our sovereignty being ignored? Yes, yes, so, Neil, you're
Speaker 1: gonna have to change your own diapers. Sorry, uh okay.
Speaker 1: You know what bothers me about that is the assumption
Speaker 1: that Latinos that come from South America only want to
Speaker 1: do that, like they don't. No, no, it's the other way.
Speaker 1: That's that's not true. What it is true is the
Speaker 1: ones that do that come for the most part from
Speaker 1: South America. You have to look at it both ways.
Speaker 1: You cannot say this is what they want to do
Speaker 1: and only there are some highly skilled people, not illegal immigrants.
Speaker 1: I will tell you that right now. Illegal migrants are
Speaker 1: not highly skilled. We don't have cardiovascular surgeons sneaking over
Speaker 1: the border that we don't have. It is. It's tough
Speaker 1: for everybody on this one. And what is the takeaway?
Speaker 1: You're gonna change your own diverse. Okay, we're done, coming
Speaker 1: up Rich to Morrow before me? Pardon you before me?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, oh yeah, okay, coming up Rich to morreaw
Speaker 1: with Tech Tuesday KFI a M. You've been listening to
Speaker 1: the Bill Handle Show. Catch My Show Monday through Friday
Speaker 1: six am to nine am, and anytime on demand on
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app,