Speaker 1: And good morning. Today is Wednesday, September fourth, twenty twenty four,
Speaker 1: and we are here once again with mister Dwayne. We
Speaker 1: could just call him doctor Dwayne. He's at this point
Speaker 1: doctor of historical forensics. And how are you doing today? Man,
Speaker 1: I'm don nex farming as well.
Speaker 2: Yep. I just actually got in. I've got a bunch
Speaker 2: of pickling kukes in an ice bath right now. We
Speaker 2: did I actually the first time ever I did my
Speaker 2: own pickling qukes a couple of days ago. We did
Speaker 2: nearly fifty of them, so it was an all day thing.
Speaker 2: And uh yeah, we're going to keep going. As long
Speaker 2: as the weather's good and the plants are producing, we're
Speaker 2: gonna keep harvesting these pickling kukes for ourselves. At this point,
Speaker 2: we're gonna try to get to like two hundred jars
Speaker 2: of pickles for the winter a right, So that's where
Speaker 2: we're We got like six weeks left in the farm
Speaker 2: in the harvest box, and then it's into the fall
Speaker 2: and preparing for next year.
Speaker 1: Very very cool. I'm just setting up to see that
Speaker 1: it make sure I can see the ftjuh, what do
Speaker 1: you call it? A chat too? So that way everybody
Speaker 1: feels like they're included this morning, and I guess I'll
Speaker 1: just set this off with.
Speaker 2: A welcome to everybody that's joining us.
Speaker 1: Yep, we got Twitter, we have Rumbull of course, and
Speaker 1: we have FTJ Media. So yeah, what would you like
Speaker 1: to take it today? There's a lot of crazy stuff
Speaker 1: going on. We have the World Health Organization declaring this
Speaker 1: is not news anymore. It's already happened. But this uh
Speaker 1: cover up for vaccine injury called monkey pox and whatever
Speaker 1: else poisoned. They're spring on us, you have, you know,
Speaker 1: I mean, there's a nonslaught of all kinds of things,
Speaker 1: people dropping dead, and they're calling it West Nile. Who
Speaker 1: knows what the truth is and what the fear mongering is,
Speaker 1: but we know they have released all kinds of mosquitoes
Speaker 1: everywhere and gotten us what they engineered them to do.
Speaker 1: But you know, we have a bunch of flying syringes
Speaker 1: thanks to Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates' that's a nice pair, huh,
Speaker 1: pretty pretty wonderful people there. Yeah, weaponized, Yeah, I mean
Speaker 1: even the testing things.
Speaker 2: So I mean that.
Speaker 1: I was just in the store at Albertson's the other
Speaker 1: day and I took a picture of the checkout because
Speaker 1: staring me in the face, we are COVID nineteen tests
Speaker 1: mm swabs. I mean jumping up.
Speaker 2: Now it's gearing up. They're starting to form a narrative
Speaker 2: around this monkey box. And we showed through a bulletproof
Speaker 2: pubcast a couple of years ago now about Event two
Speaker 2: to one. Yep, it scenario planning that they did, and
Speaker 2: it showed that they were going to unveil a monkey
Speaker 2: pox agenda, and it actually came out the exact same day.
Speaker 2: The first report of a monkey pox came out the
Speaker 2: exact same day that they'd indicated in that scenario planning,
Speaker 2: and that was all done at Johns Hopkins. We've been
Speaker 2: kind of expecting this monkey pox and I would say
Speaker 2: I would direct people if you can go look at
Speaker 2: the Dark Winter videos. These are from the nineties maybe,
Speaker 2: but they do these sort of pseudo fox media hits
Speaker 2: as dramatizations, and they've played the same things at this
Speaker 2: event two to one. A couple of years ago during
Speaker 2: COVID at JHU, they had these little snippets of which
Speaker 2: they got actors together and they looked like talking heads,
Speaker 2: and they went through the scenario showed what the media
Speaker 2: is going to say and how they're going to act,
Speaker 2: and showed the steps and then they had a diagram
Speaker 2: that showed the timeline for it all. And it actually
Speaker 2: the first first time that mainstream had indicated that there
Speaker 2: was monkeypox was on the exact same day. I think
Speaker 2: it was March early March of twenty twenty two. So
Speaker 2: that was kind of eye opening. But then you know,
Speaker 2: it never happened, So I think it's it's there's a
Speaker 2: chance that you know, we got ahead of that narrative
Speaker 2: and they were forced to delay it, and that's what
Speaker 2: we're seeing now.
Speaker 1: So here's a funny thing. I'm hearing myself in the
Speaker 1: background there they check make sure Marie goes off. I
Speaker 1: don't hear okay, all right. So Operation dark Winter was
Speaker 1: a real thing too. It's funny that this show would
Speaker 1: be called that because there's a code name for a
Speaker 1: senior level biol terrorist attack simulated simulation conducted on June
Speaker 1: twenty second and twenty third of two thousand and one,
Speaker 1: designed to carry out a mock version of a covert
Speaker 1: and widespread smallpox attack on the United States. You know,
Speaker 1: say Andrews Air Force Base was involved. All kinds of stuff.
Speaker 2: Now there's similarities between smallpox and monkey pok too.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, it's all it all presents the same. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they're just gonna call things different names, so they want
Speaker 1: different origins for why they they're gonna claim it's happening. Yeah,
Speaker 1: like smallpox itself, Like the tanneries that we're dumping into
Speaker 1: the water supply, we're causing most of that, And of
Speaker 1: course they call it something else. It's virus. You gotta
Speaker 1: there's no cure, you gotta, you gotta take the shoe,
Speaker 1: you know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I find it amazing actually that you know, we
Speaker 2: all eat food that we can't pronounce. There's ingredients in
Speaker 2: there we don't know what are and and we still
Speaker 2: donate to charities to try to find a cause for
Speaker 2: cancer when it's actually in our behavior, right, we cause
Speaker 2: cancer by our own behavior. If we're gonna buy into
Speaker 2: the mainstream and shop at supermarkets exclusively, well chances are
Speaker 2: you're gonna come down with some sort of disease because
Speaker 2: it's just not just in the air and in our
Speaker 2: waters and in our food. But you know, it's everything
Speaker 2: that we do. And thank you scientific expert for all
Speaker 2: of that.
Speaker 1: Please don't have a food baterine are Yeah, you know
Speaker 1: it's funny somebody else that brought you know what, if
Speaker 1: I can find this clip. I know you wanted to
Speaker 1: talk today a little bit about Kerry Mullis, and I
Speaker 1: think that's that was a good intro us talking about
Speaker 1: this stuff because it's very well related. I'm going to
Speaker 1: while you're sitting up of them, I'm going to see
Speaker 1: if I can find this one clip last night that
Speaker 1: kind of puts things in perspective. Some of it might
Speaker 1: be like, I don't know, let's say it's a little
Speaker 1: bit of a redundancy because a lot of people might
Speaker 1: know this the background of this, but there's actually an
Speaker 1: interesting timeline of things that occurred that I'm going to
Speaker 1: see if I can describe right here this was.
Speaker 2: And what is the pharmaceutical company or pharmaceutical industry itself,
Speaker 2: but the scientific expert right right, So I'm when you
Speaker 2: look at the origins of you know, the pharmaceutical industries,
Speaker 2: guess who goes back to the same kind of people.
Speaker 1: So this is interesting because a lot of I think
Speaker 1: this will put thing some perspective too. A little bit
Speaker 1: real quick, I'm going to share the screen and I
Speaker 1: think I could just go with this. This will be
Speaker 1: a really quick video, but let me just play this.
Speaker 1: Can you see it?
Speaker 2: I can, all right? Consetitution of the United States of America.
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 3: It is everything you know about the United States. This
Speaker 3: lady lost her life trying to get you this information.
Speaker 3: This isn't taught in schools, it's not mentioned in the news,
Speaker 3: but it's real and it affects every American.
Speaker 1: To this tegery, it's a constitution that we know today.
Speaker 4: In a fact or is there a different constitution that
Speaker 4: you claim.
Speaker 5: Unfortunately, we are being snookered by the Congress, and we
Speaker 5: are not under our first constitution. We are under this
Speaker 5: second secret constitution. The reason this happened is because when
Speaker 5: Benjamin Franklin was negotiating the Revolutionary War debt, he got
Speaker 5: rescheduling and it was going to fall due in the
Speaker 5: eighteen seventies. And when that debt fell due and we
Speaker 5: couldn't pay it, that's when the bankers gave us a
Speaker 5: second secret constitution. They turned the United States into a corporation.
Speaker 3: Under this new corporate constitution, citizens became property collateral for debt.
Speaker 1: You're right, So, just so you know this is a dramatization,
Speaker 1: but that is true about what they're saying about the
Speaker 1: eighteen seventy six or seventy one time where it was incorporated,
Speaker 1: so rules had changed and we know about maritime law
Speaker 1: and things of that nature. We did we did become collateral.
Speaker 1: But this is one of those AI inspector theory things.
Speaker 1: So just so you know, they take truth and they
Speaker 1: mix it with their own dramatization. They fill in blanks.
Speaker 1: So just the people are aware out there. I'm not
Speaker 1: being fooled by this. I understand what's going on here.
Speaker 1: This is partial fabrication with truth into it, and this
Speaker 1: is how this guy gets away with saying things online
Speaker 1: without being canceled. So that's that's kind of what's going
Speaker 1: on there.
Speaker 2: Keeper.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I just wanted to put that out there
Speaker 1: that there's no reason that woman would have lost this
Speaker 1: woman lost their life together. There's there's no reason why
Speaker 1: that would have happened. It's talking about basically things that
Speaker 1: you can look up on your own. It's no reason
Speaker 1: why I killed for that.
Speaker 2: So she's saying that the Constitution was overtaken even before
Speaker 2: the turn of the twentieth century.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and it makes sense. Because eighteen sixty five, we
Speaker 1: pretty much were no longer had the yeah, what do
Speaker 1: you call it, the consent of the consent of the
Speaker 1: government after what happened with the secession and the war.
Speaker 1: That was kind of the point there, a little bit
Speaker 1: split us up, leaping us and put us in the
Speaker 1: massive debt. They didn't che didn't talk about that because
Speaker 1: that's that's that was a different string of narrative that
Speaker 1: they were playing off of right there.
Speaker 2: But yeah, and I think Lincoln actually plays a role
Speaker 2: in all of that too, and he's there at that
Speaker 2: key time. It's all progressive. It's all progressive people, Yeah,
Speaker 2: for sure. So, yeah, where do you want to go
Speaker 2: because I can talk about I wouldn't mind talking about, uh.
Speaker 1: Carrie Mollis. Yeah, let's go for it.
Speaker 2: And so for those that are unfamiliar with who Carrie
Speaker 2: Mallis is, he's the inventor of the PCR test and
Speaker 2: he died right before COVID, which is interesting because he's
Speaker 2: the loudest critic of Fauci and this reliance on the
Speaker 2: scientific expert the way that they're actually uh depicting it
Speaker 2: and rolling it out these days.
Speaker 1: Another person that was taken out was that woman who
Speaker 1: used to I think she used to work for Murky
Speaker 1: and I'm gonna forget her name, Brandy anyway, she was
Speaker 1: dead by her by her son. She was in that
Speaker 1: I think she was in a movie with is it
Speaker 1: Fax or something like that with Oh Del Big three. Yeah, Brandy,
Speaker 1: Brandy Vaughn.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And these kinds of things have been happening for
Speaker 2: actually a long time, the silencing and even murder of
Speaker 2: you know, dissenting voices against the medical industry.
Speaker 1: For sure, they either killed or in December of twenty
Speaker 1: twenty or twenty nineteen. Right, yeah, So can.
Speaker 2: You see Kerry Mollas here?
Speaker 1: Yep?
Speaker 2: Okay, So there's a couple of clips I want to
Speaker 2: play off here, and this one he starts, I think
Speaker 2: this is where he's talking about science. If he had
Speaker 2: his way in the scientific community, what it would look
Speaker 2: like today. And let me know if you don't hear anything, Okay.
Speaker 6: If I had my way, I would make a few changes,
Speaker 6: and I would make them slowly and carefully. I wouldn't
Speaker 6: make any radical kinds of changes. I would change science
Speaker 6: to be more like just to be a little less
Speaker 6: responsive to central authority, make it more like if you're
Speaker 6: going to fund a scientist for something that he says,
Speaker 6: here's what I'll do for you.
Speaker 7: You give me two hundred thousand dollars in this year
Speaker 7: and I'll do this.
Speaker 6: I think, well, okay, why don't you just give it
Speaker 6: them two hundred thousand and let him do what he
Speaker 6: wants to do it. Don't fund don't make him tell
Speaker 6: you what he's doing, don't make him convince his colleagues
Speaker 6: that what he's going to work on it. If he's
Speaker 6: good enough to give it to him for one thing,
Speaker 6: just give it to him and let him decide, because
Speaker 6: you'll get a lot better science that way, and a
Speaker 6: lot more freedom for scientists to actually pursue their own goals,
Speaker 6: and a lot more discussion, which is a really important
Speaker 6: issue today about what is the proper way to go
Speaker 6: about what particular problem. You know, the way that's done
Speaker 6: now is by it's rather medieval, and it counts on
Speaker 6: the fact that's not true anymore, that scientists never lie,
Speaker 6: that scientists will always be honest, and that they aren't
Speaker 6: each other's competitor, that they're each other's colleagues. You know,
Speaker 6: the way we do the way papers get published, the
Speaker 6: way grants get funded.
Speaker 7: All of that.
Speaker 6: Stuff is like ancient. It's it's the structure that worked
Speaker 6: in the seventeenth century maybe, but it doesn't work now.
Speaker 6: It works very very much against science, which is I
Speaker 6: think one of the better institutions on the on the planet.
Speaker 7: I mean, science is.
Speaker 6: Why we are sitting here with you know, lights and
Speaker 6: stuff like that. Empirical science, but not it was it was,
Speaker 6: it's always it's almost always flourished better when you know
Speaker 6: discent was was expected and infecting courage.
Speaker 7: To have a central.
Speaker 6: Authority like the NIH doing all the medical making all
Speaker 6: the medical decisions, it's kind of ridiculous.
Speaker 2: Very prone, right, So there's a there's just a ton
Speaker 2: to discuss there.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they pay for the desired findings. First of all.
Speaker 1: You know, if Rockefeller or NIH or something like that
Speaker 1: is funding, they're not funding for you to find it
Speaker 1: something that's contradictory to what they're expecting to see. Where'd
Speaker 1: you get who? I got you?
Speaker 8: There we are.
Speaker 1: And there's a lot of this stuff out there that's
Speaker 1: absolutely terrible for you, But they'll give you some kind
Speaker 1: of possible positive spin. I'm not just talking about vaccines,
Speaker 1: but there was this apparently and NIH funded research on
Speaker 1: those fit those phantom stem cells that are in urine.
Speaker 1: It's wastewater if your body, you're telling yourself that you're
Speaker 1: telling you you're saying that God and your body are
Speaker 1: so stupid that it's getting rid of stuff that you want.
Speaker 1: And the only reason why people ever used to do
Speaker 1: that it wasn't for survival, because it's saltier than seawater.
Speaker 1: It's full of the crap that your body was trying
Speaker 1: to get rid of. But this urine therapy stuff, this
Speaker 1: is this is mockery. This is like a ritual that
Speaker 1: they do for when they're doing like Satanic ritual abuse
Speaker 1: and they're getting people to do it willfully. There's whatever
Speaker 1: stem cells are in there, they're obviously not good. Otherwise
Speaker 1: your body wouldn't get rid of them, if there's even
Speaker 1: anything there at all. But the reason why they say, oh,
Speaker 1: this is an ancient practice is because of drugs and
Speaker 1: passing through the liver. The first time you would have
Speaker 1: in your urine because your body was smart enough to
Speaker 1: get rid of what it considered a tox and a
Speaker 1: higher concentration of things like amini and muscaria, and you're
Speaker 1: in your urine So this all happened because they wanted
Speaker 1: to get high. They wanted to have their their shaman
Speaker 1: shamanistics experience. So they got and they drank their pea
Speaker 1: or they'd have the reason why you see the reindeer thing,
Speaker 1: that's because they would sometimes drink the urine from the
Speaker 1: reindeer that eat the mushrooms. This is where that came from.
Speaker 1: And they're like, oh, it's some magical mystery drug. No
Speaker 1: n I H is fucking to do, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean? That's and that's and hey, they funded it,
Speaker 1: so they're gonna get the they're gonna get whatever whatever
Speaker 1: desired outcome from the research that they asked.
Speaker 2: For, right, And what is he talking about really but
Speaker 2: the grant system. And so when you read the book
Speaker 2: Foundations by Renee Wormser, he was an investigator into some
Speaker 2: of these or he was involved in some of these
Speaker 2: committees that were investigating like the trusts and you know,
Speaker 2: all of these things, early in nineteen hundreds, and he
Speaker 2: wrote a book called Foundations Their Wealth and Influence, And
Speaker 2: this is exactly what he exposed was that, you know,
Speaker 2: these scientists are perverted by the influence of money and
Speaker 2: the grant system.
Speaker 1: They're there to take the money and give the results.
Speaker 1: A lot of science isn't even done. It's just let go,
Speaker 1: let's go sit in this room for a couple of
Speaker 1: days and come back out and tell them what they
Speaker 1: wanted to hear.
Speaker 2: Right, So that's inductive rather than deductive. Right, we are
Speaker 2: in inductivity. We establish a hypothesis and a conclusion that
Speaker 2: we want to find, and then we make that happen deductively,
Speaker 2: we follow the empirical evidence. This is the distinction that
Speaker 2: is being made by Carrie Mollis here is the two
Speaker 2: different methods.
Speaker 1: Isn't a confirmation biased part of that too? Like, you
Speaker 1: can also influence the outcome just by what you sure
Speaker 1: feel you think is going to happen. That's what you
Speaker 1: end up seeing. That's where you find the evidence of
Speaker 1: because of what you're looking for, you find. So there's
Speaker 1: I think that's what they call that confirmation bias, right,
Speaker 1: Like you're you're pretty much only looking at the things
Speaker 1: that support your in your hypothesis too, So that's just
Speaker 1: something that's human nature overcoming that. But if you're actually
Speaker 1: getting funded and given money for desired result that they're
Speaker 1: telling you, this is what you're going to find you know,
Speaker 1: now it's now, it's a Now it's a business.
Speaker 8: Yeah.
Speaker 2: So he he brings up the word discussion right in
Speaker 2: in the scientific community, there isn't so much discussion anymore,
Speaker 2: and that's really a critical aspect that we have. We
Speaker 2: aren't allowed to talk anymore or be critical of any
Speaker 2: studies that are in the mainstream that are pushing these narratives.
Speaker 1: Who's your degree? Are you adopted?
Speaker 2: Exactly right, all of the things, and so he makes
Speaker 2: a distinction, but he says that empirical science is really
Speaker 2: the way to go. And I agree that science is
Speaker 2: a technology and a method. And you can see that
Speaker 2: scientism has been developed out of it much the same
Speaker 2: way that you just described earlier, how a gatekeeper will
Speaker 2: tell you a certain amount of truth but then fill
Speaker 2: in the blanks. It's the same thing there, m And
Speaker 2: then he also says, scientists never lie, right, This is
Speaker 2: the belief that everybody has in the mainstream, is that
Speaker 2: scientists would never lie and of nobility. And so that's
Speaker 2: an appeal to authority. And now you've fallen into the
Speaker 2: pitfall of a logical fallacy because you were never taught
Speaker 2: that generally out there television viewers. I know that you
Speaker 2: know your viewership and your friends will know all of
Speaker 2: this very well. And then at the end he says,
Speaker 2: the NIH and the way that they do things is ridiculous.
Speaker 1: Do they go into it.
Speaker 2: Here we are, how many ever years later, and we're
Speaker 2: still following this. You know, this same guy is involved
Speaker 2: in the push you're talking about.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah. And he had to even he couldn't
Speaker 1: find something deadly enough, he had to go, you had
Speaker 1: to go, uh take something off the dusty shelf with
Speaker 1: azt the thing that's jealousy sponge toksin derived or synthesized
Speaker 1: in order to like really get the job done. There
Speaker 1: was a it was a cancer medicine that was too deadly.
Speaker 2: Yep. And he talked also about the importance of dissent. Right, Really,
Speaker 2: the dissenting voice the most important in a democracy mm hm.
Speaker 2: The voice against the reigning power is supposed to be
Speaker 2: the most important. And you know democrats will largely recognize
Speaker 2: that when there's a Republican in office and not the
Speaker 2: other way around.
Speaker 1: You know, this has this this structure of you know,
Speaker 1: this appeal to authority, this this rise of the expert thing.
Speaker 1: I can't help but see this as being the same,
Speaker 1: and there's there's a positive negative, like when when your
Speaker 1: elders are actually noble, then this is a fine system.
Speaker 1: But when they're the Sanhedrin type level, right, you know.
Speaker 2: What I mean?
Speaker 1: And this is kind of the same structure that we
Speaker 1: have now in our society. It's the well, whatever you
Speaker 1: want to call it, the special people's Sanhedrin. You know,
Speaker 1: they're they're council of elders of whatever. Where do you
Speaker 1: want to put there?
Speaker 2: And I was thinking about this this morning in that
Speaker 2: how the scientific method and how we follow the opinion
Speaker 2: of the scientific expert isn't necessarily a bad way to
Speaker 2: go about doing things in government society at large, except
Speaker 2: you have to watch who you put in there, and
Speaker 2: you have to watch what they're motivated by. The people's
Speaker 2: hardly where we are is that, you know, I think
Speaker 2: it is generally a decent idea, although it is very
Speaker 2: anti democratic in the name of democracy is you know
Speaker 2: how they actually applied it was that this is really
Speaker 2: the only way that democracy can work is if.
Speaker 1: You know it works the mob rule, or it's a
Speaker 1: dictatorship in a sense, that's socialism. By the time it
Speaker 1: gets gets on its legs. So it's it's democracy is
Speaker 1: the word that they replace constitutional republic with all too often,
Speaker 1: and and also the people because of it's a constitutional
Speaker 1: republic that it we're not doing our job by putting
Speaker 1: the checks and balance in place because if we expect
Speaker 1: them to self regulate. EXA's my problem. We can't let
Speaker 1: them police themselves because there's too much corruption. There isn't
Speaker 1: a good and a bad guy fighting against each other
Speaker 1: to save the world. It's not it's not true. It's
Speaker 1: bad and a bad guy trying to fuck you over.
Speaker 1: I just saw us on the pop up things disappear.
Speaker 1: Are you putting it back up now?
Speaker 2: Yeah? I'm going to just share this next quote from
Speaker 2: that interview because that is what he's addressing. Is this
Speaker 2: idea the best and brightest. And then he later actually
Speaker 2: says exactly that that, you know, the sheep actually can't
Speaker 2: determine who's a better expert.
Speaker 1: And I like Carrie, but I'm almost questioning, like the
Speaker 1: pc R concept of being maybe like observational misunderstanding too,
Speaker 1: of what it's actually telling you. I think he actually.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and I have that video here queued up, and
Speaker 2: we will get to that because he makes some incredible
Speaker 2: admissions about the PCR test and how it was misused
Speaker 2: or misinterpreted. So ten fifty or No. One eleven twenty,
Speaker 2: this is where he talks about the beast, the best
Speaker 2: and brightest, How that is an influence on our society.
Speaker 9: Here we go political positions.
Speaker 1: Can you turn it up a little bit as possible?
Speaker 1: I can't very very much.
Speaker 6: I mean, I mean, we knew, if we studied Hegel
Speaker 6: at all, that after the sixties there was going to
Speaker 6: be a swing back to a repressive government, right, I mean,
Speaker 6: it just.
Speaker 7: Was going to happen. There was nothing that you could
Speaker 7: do to stop it.
Speaker 6: I don't think it swung farther than I thought would
Speaker 6: ever go, but we definitely got into it. And and
Speaker 6: and that's I mean, the whole business of AIDS. If
Speaker 6: you want to look at it as in a big picture,
Speaker 6: AIDS is a Hegelian you know, it's it's the pendulum
Speaker 6: swinging back to the right thing, less permissiveness. You know,
Speaker 6: people that don't pay attention to their grandmother's code of
Speaker 6: ethics are going to suffer for it, right, And it's
Speaker 6: I mean, you can figure out all the little mechanisms
Speaker 6: of how that happened. But you can also just.
Speaker 7: Look at it in the big pictures say yeah, that's
Speaker 7: going to happen. And now it's going to come a time.
Speaker 6: Pretty soon when it's going to go back the other way,
Speaker 6: hopefully the swings.
Speaker 9: I'm afraid that we have some sex and enjoy it.
Speaker 7: You know, I never long.
Speaker 9: After study, and I saw at that time how you
Speaker 9: can take one of the best and brightest in America,
Speaker 9: much as they did our greatest living scientists in the century,
Speaker 9: who was destroyed, doctor Andrew Ivy. There was never a
Speaker 9: scientist who's been more cited in the scientific literature than
Speaker 9: doctor Ivy. He was he was, He was a jurist,
Speaker 9: he was a physician, he was a scientist, he was everything.
Speaker 9: But he supported Cabiason, and he supported Cabison in a
Speaker 9: correct manner, and they destroyed them. And that's been shown.
Speaker 9: Now I'm looking at what the media has done to you,
Speaker 9: projecting you as a flippant, drug taking, drug taking womanizing,
Speaker 9: a person who has who everyone has to wonder how
Speaker 9: you even got through colleagues. Le alone got a Nobel Prize,
Speaker 9: and I'm thinking, my god, haven't we learned haven't we
Speaker 9: learned from Andrew Ivy and Linus Pauling and Peter Dusburg
Speaker 9: what they'll do to the best well, you.
Speaker 1: Know, hold on, don't throw Linus Pauling in there, just
Speaker 1: just yet, there, buddy. He was Rockefeller funded and he
Speaker 1: ended up killing himself in his own blindness as to
Speaker 1: how uh you know his his asotic acid overdosing, heavy
Speaker 1: massive dosing ends up giving him a disease that was
Speaker 1: caused by copper deficiency.
Speaker 2: Yesnel, Linus Pauling is a definite important historical figure in
Speaker 2: all of this new world order, this rise of the expert.
Speaker 2: You can see that there's a little bit of naive
Speaker 2: it say, but here in this conversation between Gary Noll
Speaker 2: and carrying all us in that they're they're believing some
Speaker 2: certain aspects of the mainstream narrative while exposing this same
Speaker 2: thing that we're trying to show this uh, the pseudo
Speaker 2: scientific environment that they've created.
Speaker 1: I'm sure their intentive was, uh wasn't that. But you know,
Speaker 1: just everybody has those those rocks that don't the road
Speaker 1: as fast when the tide is coming in and showing
Speaker 1: you something else. You know, so you have that you
Speaker 1: stick on some things that aren't exactly right.
Speaker 2: I get see how they've vilified him by calling him
Speaker 2: a drug taking womanizer, because he's he's actually making great
Speaker 2: arguments against the narrative of HIV. He's he stated and
Speaker 2: proved that HIV was not the cause of AIDS, and
Speaker 2: now we are seeing that out in the mainstream narrative now, right,
Speaker 2: m HIV didn't isn't necessarily the cause of AIDS. We
Speaker 2: saw that like three years ago or four years ago
Speaker 2: come out publicly.
Speaker 1: And what exactly is HIV anyway? You know, ages drug
Speaker 1: induced or what do you call it? An autoimmune destruction
Speaker 1: based on lifestyle. So there's a couple of things going
Speaker 1: on there. But it sure as how didn't help that
Speaker 1: they were shooting people up with have b vaxes, all right,
Speaker 1: and so it targeting certain communities, some colorful communities in fact.
Speaker 2: Right, And so Kerry Mallis's answer here he actually uses
Speaker 2: the word sheep to describe the general pub Look, so
Speaker 2: you can see that there is some intelligence there. It's
Speaker 2: just some aspects of this whole story.
Speaker 1: He doesn't quite Oh yeah, he's it's definitely a break guy.
Speaker 6: Sure to really respect the best in the bridest. They
Speaker 6: don't know the difference. Really, I mean, I like humans don't,
Speaker 6: don't get me wrong, but basically that.
Speaker 9: God, haven't we learned. Haven't we learned from Andrew Ivy
Speaker 9: and Linus Pauling and Peter Dusburg what they'll do to
Speaker 9: the best in brightest.
Speaker 6: Well, you know, you can't expect the sheep to really
Speaker 6: respect the best in the brightest. They don't know the difference. Really,
Speaker 6: I mean, I like, humans don't, don't get me wrong.
Speaker 10: But basically, there is a there's a there's a vast
Speaker 10: the vast majority of them do not possess the ability
Speaker 10: to judge who is and who isn't a really good scientist.
Speaker 7: I mean that's a problem.
Speaker 6: That's the main problem actually with science, I'd say in
Speaker 6: the century, because the science is being judged by people.
Speaker 6: Finding is done by people who don't understand it.
Speaker 7: People.
Speaker 6: I mean, I'm sure a lot of people could sit
Speaker 6: down with line is falling and not realize that he
Speaker 6: was a brilliant man. I mean, most people wouldn't know
Speaker 6: him from you know, somebody who you know this is
Speaker 6: a little taller, or somebody nobody knows Richard Fireman or Richard.
Speaker 2: Okay, so that's interesting.
Speaker 1: That was strike too, I said Richard Fieman. I was like, ou,
Speaker 1: which that was strike too. This is the guy who
Speaker 1: sat around talking about uh how when he was asked
Speaker 1: an honest question about what is a what is a field?
Speaker 1: And what is magnetism? He goes on to this story
Speaker 1: about an old woman slipping on the ice and Ken
Speaker 1: Wheeler over at the oorya appavastus for like a year
Speaker 1: and a half was like crushing and breaking that apart.
Speaker 1: That was pretty funny because Ken likes to repeat himself,
Speaker 1: So a year and a half is not being is
Speaker 1: by no means exaggerating. He was a little stuck on
Speaker 1: that for a while.
Speaker 2: Well yeah, so you can see, you know, Carrie Mollis,
Speaker 2: you can see now you know he makes great arguments.
Speaker 2: This is why in twenty nineteen, just before the outbreak
Speaker 2: of COVID, I mean, this is what I assume is
Speaker 2: that he was eliminated. The official cause of death I
Speaker 2: think was pneumonia. But you know, you're crazy, right, You
Speaker 2: can do some tricky things with medicine these days.
Speaker 1: Hospitalized, right, So I mean, once there's once he's there.
Speaker 1: It's not like he died at home from right Rebecca Nuts, I.
Speaker 2: Always have it. So there is another video here of
Speaker 2: Carrie Mollis speaking. I'm not sure if you need to make.
Speaker 1: Sure what what's really going on because my dog's a
Speaker 1: little bit over crazy.
Speaker 2: Let me, I'll see if I can figure this out here.
Speaker 2: So the video that I want to show you here
Speaker 2: is of Carrie Mollis speaking at a at a public event,
Speaker 2: and he's talking about the PCR and how it can
Speaker 2: be misinterpreted. Now I'm having a little difficulty finding it
Speaker 2: as I'm scrolling through my Chrome tab share tabs, and
Speaker 2: it would be important to look at this because the
Speaker 2: admissions he makes of how uh you know, an entire
Speaker 2: population of people, eight billion people on this earth can
Speaker 2: be fooled by an appeal to the expert because we
Speaker 2: don't actually check the evidence are sources of what they say,
Speaker 2: and it opens us up to falling for logical fallacy.
Speaker 2: And I'm not sure if I'm going to be able
Speaker 2: to do it. Just give me what was going on
Speaker 2: out there?
Speaker 1: Some many kind of man with a floppy hat. I
Speaker 1: wanted to remind us about the fucking elections, Like get
Speaker 1: the funk out.
Speaker 2: Of here, dude, Right liberal you're here.
Speaker 1: No, she's not, and I'm in the middle of something.
Speaker 1: Get out of here, knock out. Yeah, there's a sign
Speaker 1: that says do not knock, do not ring, bill, leave
Speaker 1: us a freak alone, right, that's exactly Yeah, ly Pace
Speaker 1: its engine.
Speaker 2: So yeah, if I wanted to share a video, mm hmm,
Speaker 2: that's on my toolbar at the autumn.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah. So go to present and then you
Speaker 1: go to share a screen if it's if it's actually
Speaker 1: on your computer, you can click video file and then
Speaker 1: just pull it from the from the folder, or you
Speaker 1: can hit or you can hit share a screen again,
Speaker 1: so I can get video go to yeah, or you
Speaker 1: can go to entire screen. There's three tabs on the
Speaker 1: top or so she's if you hit the entire screen,
Speaker 1: you're not going to see anything but the screen because
Speaker 1: you have to stay on it. If you if you
Speaker 1: navigate away, everybody else does too. But if you hit
Speaker 1: entire screen and then you click the box that shows
Speaker 1: up that says entire screen, make sure on the bottom
Speaker 1: there's a thing that says also share system audio. You
Speaker 1: just need to slide that tab over, Okay, otherwise you won't.
Speaker 1: So there's two ways to do it. If it's already
Speaker 1: on your computer, you can do it through the present
Speaker 1: video thing. And if it's the if you prefer to
Speaker 1: just do the entire screen, you'll just have to stay there.
Speaker 1: You won't see me for a little bit while it's playing.
Speaker 1: I know that's gonna make you sad.
Speaker 2: I think I got her, all right, I got it.
Speaker 7: Let me just see.
Speaker 1: Yeah that that there's a tricky little bar at the
Speaker 1: bottom like it. And when you do the other present screens,
Speaker 1: it's already slid over for the audio. But they try
Speaker 1: to messlegay when it's an entire screen. It's here. It's like,
Speaker 1: why even make that an option? If I'm going to
Speaker 1: share it and it has audio, of course i'd band
Speaker 1: people to hear it. You know, well, I would you
Speaker 1: even do that a little sabotage button.
Speaker 2: It's proving a little beyond my cognitive abilities at this point.
Speaker 1: Pres just click the try the share screen because once
Speaker 1: you pull it up on your screen, like and it's
Speaker 1: up in front of your face, we're gonna see everything
Speaker 1: that you that you see. So if you click the
Speaker 1: share screen and then you just go to the entire screen,
Speaker 1: this is probably gonna do it. There's a box here
Speaker 1: that says entire screen, and then there should be an
Speaker 1: also share audio system at the bottom right hand corner.
Speaker 1: Slide it over and hit share and then it'll show
Speaker 1: whatever screen that you're on at the time, unless it's
Speaker 1: only something that I can do. I think you have
Speaker 1: that option too, though.
Speaker 11: So why why it's so many songs that I mad
Speaker 11: right now?
Speaker 1: Okay, can you see that I'll have to open up first, yep.
Speaker 2: Okay, so we could see a brick wall there, yep. Okay.
Speaker 2: So this may be familiar to most are your viewers,
Speaker 2: but it is very important to go over this again
Speaker 2: because he actually shows how the whole trick was done.
Speaker 2: COVID and HIV AIDS epidemic.
Speaker 8: Uh.
Speaker 2: And the stop sharing button is in front of the
Speaker 2: play button.
Speaker 1: Oh, you can just hit hide.
Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, yeah, all right, there we go. Okay, we're
Speaker 2: just gonna let her play from the beginning here and
Speaker 2: you can stop me anywhere along the way.
Speaker 1: Daniel, Look, Harry, how do they misuse PCR to Hey,
Speaker 1: you have to keep your eye up, I think miss
Speaker 1: can you hear it?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: When you show your when you throw your audio down,
Speaker 1: it's gonna take the audio off that though, so I
Speaker 1: think you sleep, did your audios? I muted my mic? Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: that did it?
Speaker 2: Okay, so we'll just or go. The question is how
Speaker 2: can you misuse the PCR. And here he is the
Speaker 2: inventor of it explaining how. And it's actually not a misuse,
Speaker 2: it's a misinterpretation.
Speaker 7: You use ZR is not quite I don't think you
Speaker 7: can misuse PCRs. The results the interpretation of it.
Speaker 12: See if you if you can say, if they want to,
Speaker 12: if they could find this virus in you at all,
Speaker 12: and with PCR, if you do it well, you can
Speaker 12: find almost anything in anybody. It starts making you believe
Speaker 12: in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything.
Speaker 7: Is contained in everything else. Right.
Speaker 13: I mean is if you can model amplify one single
Speaker 13: molecule up to something that you can really measure, which
Speaker 13: PCR can do, then there's just very few molecules that
Speaker 13: you don't have at least one single one of them
Speaker 13: in your body.
Speaker 7: Okay, So that could be thought of as a misuse
Speaker 7: of it.
Speaker 2: So he's basically saying that you can find anything in
Speaker 2: any body through the PCR. It's going to identify even
Speaker 2: down to the single molecule and then if you find
Speaker 2: what you're looking for, you can amplify it into something
Speaker 2: that looks larger than it is. It's a literal looking
Speaker 2: mountains out of mole hills.
Speaker 1: Here exactly right. And then also the correlation there because
Speaker 1: they're looking for base pairs, so they're molding anything that
Speaker 1: they want as the outcome through their computer model, and
Speaker 1: then they find it. It's pretty easy to find anything exactly.
Speaker 2: So inductivity and that one must consider that there is
Speaker 2: an agenda, because there obviously is in the approach to
Speaker 2: finding this scientific information, right, they have a proposed outcome,
Speaker 2: so that is an agenda.
Speaker 1: Somebody said, he said, I tried to tell and show
Speaker 1: people these videos, and I get the floor rights there
Speaker 1: every time.
Speaker 2: But it's seeds planted in the moment they may not
Speaker 2: quite understand. But as time unfolds and as they continue
Speaker 2: to watch television, words come up and.
Speaker 1: People, yeah, it's good to plant the seed, but sometimes
Speaker 1: you need a little bit of you needs some minerals
Speaker 1: in that soil. Everybody's got proper nutrient.
Speaker 2: And well, I would say that this is it. You know,
Speaker 2: when you've got the inventor of the PCR stating that
Speaker 2: you can totally misuse this test that he's created to
Speaker 2: amplify anything you want into something that is significant. You know,
Speaker 2: that is a profound truth bomb, much like the Spanish
Speaker 2: flu beginning in Kansas, or the head of the chairman
Speaker 2: and CEO of Pfizer, Albert Borla, being only a veterinarian
Speaker 2: who whose team created the IMPROVAC, a chemical castration vaccine
Speaker 2: to control the populations of pigs. You know, these things
Speaker 2: shock people awake, and you know this is one of those.
Speaker 2: And this this is why I want to show it today,
Speaker 2: is because it does have that effect on people.
Speaker 1: And you know why it showed up in Kansas first, right,
Speaker 1: military calculation from Rockefeller absolutely at a place called Camp Funston,
Speaker 1: Fort Riley, now eleven kilometers away or eleven miles away
Speaker 1: from where they moved the bio level.
Speaker 2: Four lab from Plumb Island. They just moved that twenty
Speaker 2: twenty three to Kansas State University. So the origins of
Speaker 2: lime disease, the mont Talk monster, and all kinds of
Speaker 2: wacky things washing up on the shores on the tip
Speaker 2: of Long Island all moved to within eleven miles of
Speaker 2: where the Spanish flu started. So there is a I mean,
Speaker 2: that's very intriguing line of research to go down to
Speaker 2: start to realize that these things are synthetic, made, man made,
Speaker 2: and then blamed on nature.
Speaker 7: Claim that it's meaningful, but.
Speaker 12: The real misuse of it is you don't need to
Speaker 12: test for HIV. You don't need to test for the
Speaker 12: other ten thousand reper viruses that are unnamed.
Speaker 7: Also in the subject.
Speaker 12: Something that's got HIV generally is going to have almost
Speaker 12: anything that you can test for because they have definitely
Speaker 12: HIV is a fairly rare virus. There's only one million
Speaker 12: of us out of two hundred and fifty three hundred
Speaker 12: million people in America that have that virus, So you
Speaker 12: have to get around either your mother had to have
Speaker 12: it and pass it to you, or you have to
Speaker 12: really be paying a lot of attention to people that
Speaker 12: do have it as being only attention to them and
Speaker 12: get a pretty good chance to get it.
Speaker 7: That way.
Speaker 12: It's hard to get it, but if you have it,
Speaker 12: there's a good chance you've also got a lot of
Speaker 12: other ones because you've been in the market.
Speaker 7: Or you've been been possible for you to get a
Speaker 7: lot of it.
Speaker 12: To test for that one and say that has any
Speaker 12: special meaning is what I think is the problem.
Speaker 7: Not the PCR has been misused. It's like, it's not
Speaker 7: an estimation of it's real. It's a really quantitative thing.
Speaker 7: It tells you something about nature and about what's there.
Speaker 7: But it allows you to take.
Speaker 12: A very miniscule amount of anything and make it measurable
Speaker 12: and then.
Speaker 7: Talk about it in the meetings and stuff like.
Speaker 12: It is important see that that's not a misuse, that's
Speaker 12: just sort of a misinterpretation.
Speaker 2: Now that's epic. He's just basically shown how this all
Speaker 2: went down.
Speaker 8: Right.
Speaker 1: You can take anything, you can.
Speaker 2: Take anything, amplify it, make it into something, and then
Speaker 2: you can sit around the boardroom table and talk about
Speaker 2: what you're going to do about it. And hasn't any
Speaker 2: idea that what you're creating as an illusion.
Speaker 1: And the assumption still here is that this has an
Speaker 1: effect on the organism the person the way they say
Speaker 1: it does. That's that's already like exactly an assumption made
Speaker 1: without proof. Like what is making music?
Speaker 2: Yep, it's assumptions piled on top of assumptions on top
Speaker 2: of assumptions. And we know what happens to you and
Speaker 2: me when we assume yeah, makes aense out of you
Speaker 2: and me.
Speaker 1: Right, all right? Is there more to this one? Because
Speaker 1: I want to share a clip from doctor Stepan Lanka
Speaker 1: since I get a chance to kind of add yeah,
Speaker 1: I think that I'm good there.
Speaker 2: What I really wanted to get across was what he
Speaker 2: just said that the important thing to understand about the
Speaker 2: PCR is that you can take something small, make it
Speaker 2: into something that people think is something, and then you
Speaker 2: can totally direct a narrative behind it. And so that's
Speaker 2: that is how they made people. This is how they
Speaker 2: hid how people died. This is one of the main
Speaker 2: arguments of any pro vaxer says people died Dwayne. It's like, well,
Speaker 2: they died of the same things that they died of
Speaker 2: twenty and twenty nineteen at the same rate. When you
Speaker 2: look at deaths by all means and methods, the number didn't,
Speaker 2: the overall number of totality didn't. There was no bump,
Speaker 2: there's no snake in during COVID. So all they did
Speaker 2: and this is admitted by the CDC, which I off too.
Speaker 1: Though there a lot of people would have gone in
Speaker 1: the hospital and gone back home if they weren't murdering
Speaker 1: them with the protocols to make that narrative happen, you
Speaker 1: know what I mean. Like if you said no, I
Speaker 1: didn't get this, this is after the shot came out.
Speaker 1: It's like if you if you say no, I didn't
Speaker 1: get the shot, well they you were on a ventilator
Speaker 1: for that. If you said you did, they would treat
Speaker 1: you differently so that they could give the illusion that
Speaker 1: the shot made it so that you didn't die from it, right,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. And then all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: it's a way to sell the shot. So I see,
Speaker 1: this person didn't get the shot, and look what happened
Speaker 1: to him. This person did and he walked out of
Speaker 1: the hospital, right, you know.
Speaker 2: And well we look at the numbers, even what CDC offered,
Speaker 2: and I think it's the threshold. There was a certain
Speaker 2: threshold that they had to cross to call it an
Speaker 2: epidemic or a pandemic.
Speaker 1: They changed the definition that anyway, Yes, this.
Speaker 2: Is right, and so this is what this is. How
Speaker 2: ridiculous it gets, you know, trying to explain this to
Speaker 2: somebody is that you know, you've got to explain four
Speaker 2: or five things that have happened in history before you
Speaker 2: can get to the present.
Speaker 8: Day.
Speaker 2: Right, So.
Speaker 1: The two thousand and six that they I think it
Speaker 1: was around that time they changed the definition of a pandemic,
Speaker 1: would there, Yes, And.
Speaker 2: So the CDC and I've got this documented. I have
Speaker 2: the receipts that they said that you know, they combined
Speaker 2: influence and pneumonia and COVID and a very very very
Speaker 2: small number of people actually died just by COVID with
Speaker 2: no co morbidities. Right, so you can see the trick
Speaker 2: that was played on everybody. Yes, it's awful that people die,
Speaker 2: but they were This is largely demographics of people that
Speaker 2: were near death anyways, you know, the older Yeah. So
Speaker 2: there's a lot of things in here that there, you know,
Speaker 2: we're still working on in real time as we're going
Speaker 2: and you know, sorry, oh no, I'm sorry, I was
Speaker 2: just thinking out louder it's looking for Yeah. So this
Speaker 2: I'm just showing you where we're at today with this
Speaker 2: scientific community and how much the opinion of the scientific expert,
Speaker 2: after one hundred years of it being imposed by Louis D. Brandeyes,
Speaker 2: has really stretched out its fullest, to its fullest imagination.
Speaker 2: And now we got drive up in test sites in
Speaker 2: which you know, they showed Drake COVID. There was long
Speaker 2: lineups of cars and people and getting this test shoved
Speaker 2: up their nose. Trazy and and what how did they
Speaker 2: create this? But this, this blissful ignorance and this belief
Speaker 2: in the expert, the entering wedge is what Walter Lipman
Speaker 2: called it in nineteen twenty one.
Speaker 1: All Right, so I have well that's why, that's why
Speaker 1: it's a web file. Okay, so I have one here
Speaker 1: and we'll just let it play a little bit. Sure,
Speaker 1: but I mean just put it in a full screen here.
Speaker 1: It's actually off my channel too. If you if you
Speaker 1: go into my channel, then you look up Stefan st
Speaker 1: e f a n Lanka. This is him saying that
Speaker 1: no viruses exist because they've not been isolated.
Speaker 14: Right, they have no idea? Why no rational explanation? Why
Speaker 14: idea using chemotypy? We know what is reversed times.
Speaker 1: Full on a second, I guess it started.
Speaker 9: German biologists environment say this. One of the leading critics
Speaker 9: of the war own aides is Professor Stephan Laca, a
Speaker 9: German biologist and viroologists, who questions the isolation of chip
Speaker 9: and many contradictions and lack of proper scientific reasoning behind
Speaker 9: the HIV theory, including the long form of treatment for
Speaker 9: a person with.
Speaker 14: AIDS, the background of AIDS, and we are absolutely sure
Speaker 14: about this is the antibiotic resistancy catastrophe killing people in
Speaker 14: hospitals like flies because there are no antibiotics available without
Speaker 14: resistency in some bacterias. So in a state of immune
Speaker 14: suppression in the hospital, a lot of people come down
Speaker 14: with bacterial infections. This is called sepsis because of blood poisoning.
Speaker 14: When too much bacterias are growing and producing toxins, this
Speaker 14: is going to kill them in a state of reduced immunity.
Speaker 14: And we had these problems already in the beginning of
Speaker 14: the seventies. There have been kind of emergency conferences dealing
Speaker 14: with the problem because they were scared that the resistancy
Speaker 14: would spread and they have no antibiotica available, so they
Speaker 14: invented a very strong antibioticum. And it's not the antibiotic
Speaker 14: com to say, it's pure chemotherapy. It's a double folic
Speaker 14: acid antagonist the good old sulfonymite, and two of them
Speaker 14: put together would kill every microbe. But the problem is
Speaker 14: they were scared that in the gay scene new resistency
Speaker 14: would develop and spread into the population. It was in
Speaker 14: June eighty one when the first publication came out published
Speaker 14: by the Centers of Disease Control saying five men had
Speaker 14: PCP and two of them died even being treated with
Speaker 14: zep dream. This last or the strongest antibuticum available. The
Speaker 14: age definition was there before, saying if you have PCP
Speaker 14: and if you have a KS caused by the by
Speaker 14: by night rides as well, because the night rides are
Speaker 14: transformed into n O only in the smallest results, because
Speaker 14: is high enough to perform this transformation. And n O
Speaker 14: is a very potent growth gay people. And when, of
Speaker 14: course he stimulates the self with all kinds of mitogens carcinogens,
Speaker 14: and he of course added hydrocortisone which he hasn't published,
Speaker 14: but these matters, they added, hydrocortisone like people under persistent
Speaker 14: stress hypercurtisilisma, that the same proteins are produced. Since ninety two,
Speaker 14: there is no Western blood in Great Britain because they
Speaker 14: saw it's a waste of money. You know, it's the
Speaker 14: same principle. The only clinical picture which the different risk
Speaker 14: groups have in common, that's hepatitis. You don't find a
Speaker 14: single biopsy confirmed PCP in homophilias or in truck abusers
Speaker 14: other than homosexuals. But they overcame the problem that every
Speaker 14: gay person who admits truck abuse would be in the
Speaker 14: list of truck abusers. So they have some PCP cases,
Speaker 14: but a truck or a women, a truck abusing women
Speaker 14: not using purpose, never never, never comes down with PCP.
Speaker 14: They have the definition for women with AIDS that's candidia
Speaker 14: out of the throat right, not of the mouth. But
Speaker 14: even when a medical doctor sees a little bit candidia
Speaker 14: in the mouth, they would say it's the eighth case,
Speaker 14: even when tested negative. That's also way way important that
Speaker 14: you don't need a positive test. Even a negative test
Speaker 14: would declare you to be an eight case, when how
Speaker 14: familiar confirm that you have a PCP. It's not possible
Speaker 14: to measure the strength of your immune system using the.
Speaker 1: Black There's more to this, and he gets into the
Speaker 1: whole thing. I mean, there's a if I didn't think
Speaker 1: about the son when I would be able to cue
Speaker 1: it up better. But that is a twenty two minute video.
Speaker 1: We're not going to get through the whole thing. But
Speaker 1: I just wanted to show a little bit of that.
Speaker 1: He goes into greater de detail about how they're not isolated.
Speaker 1: There's a about four different videos of doctor Steph unlocking
Speaker 1: on my on my channel, and he goes through the
Speaker 1: whole history of the of the frauds, starting with you know,
Speaker 1: not even starting with but including Pasteur and Big Champ,
Speaker 1: who was showing you that these pleomorphic microzymas or polymorphic
Speaker 1: microzymas were something that your body created the bacteria to
Speaker 1: fight and eat toxins. But sometimes they can become toxics too.
Speaker 1: But when you're trying to claim that it's a germ
Speaker 1: that's causing a disease, it's actually it's like blaming the
Speaker 1: fire department for starting the fire, just because every time
Speaker 1: you see a fire, you see the fire department, right,
Speaker 1: you know.
Speaker 2: Exactly, And so that is correlation isn't necessarily causation. Right,
Speaker 2: there's another logical fallacy that we're falling for when we
Speaker 2: just make that quantum leap or logical leap. And so
Speaker 2: are we talking about terrain versus germ theory?
Speaker 1: He was talking about that a little bit. He's he
Speaker 1: was going into the detail and then you know, the
Speaker 1: main takeaway here is that they've been pushing shots with
Speaker 1: a fraudular claim of a phantom virus for a long
Speaker 1: time and keep falling for the same trick over and
Speaker 1: over again.
Speaker 2: Well, look at the nineteen seventy six swine flu. I
Speaker 2: think we mentioned that last week, right, forty three million
Speaker 2: or forty six million Americans took a shot because the
Speaker 2: American government, President Ford, yep, President Forge everybody. Yeah, and
Speaker 2: there was never even one confirmed case. Sixty minutes Mike
Speaker 2: Wallace did an exposeonic they interviewed Mary Tyler Moore. Now
Speaker 2: there's a there's a purpose for that to still be around,
Speaker 2: of course, because that's mainstream television telling the truth. But
Speaker 2: that started at Fort Dix as well, after an inoculation program.
Speaker 2: We look at the origins of COVID. One of the
Speaker 2: first things I did when that that story started to
Speaker 2: break was I tried to trace it right to source
Speaker 2: in real time as quick as I could, because these
Speaker 2: things tend to disappear on the Internet. And the only
Speaker 2: the only the source that I got to and I
Speaker 2: couldn't go any further was two unnamed Chinese authorities. M
Speaker 2: H declared COVID right now, that is astounding that this
Speaker 2: is what they tell the public that your your source
Speaker 2: for all of this change, this radical reform in your life,
Speaker 2: and you know, the locking down of you in your
Speaker 2: own home.
Speaker 1: Well, some communists that we don't know the name, sort
Speaker 1: of our faces told us it was people.
Speaker 2: There was no name, they were unidentified.
Speaker 1: And he started, we don't know who he is either, exactly.
Speaker 2: And so when we look, we see uh, fort Dietrich.
Speaker 1: Yeah, dirty Dietrich, done dirt cheap, you got dix. They're
Speaker 1: the same, the same hubs all the time, and that's
Speaker 1: why is the main hub. Yeah, exactly, and that's what
Speaker 1: makes me cool. I had a question a couple of
Speaker 1: people who came out of there that also became these
Speaker 1: these superhero doctors on the media side, because I'm like,
Speaker 1: their plans they have to I mean, like, how do
Speaker 1: you go twenty ten, fifteen, twenty years in that profession
Speaker 1: knowing what they're doing to the mankind and all of
Speaker 1: a sudden you flip the script and you feel like
Speaker 1: you need you have the obligation to help people or
Speaker 1: is it just it seems like timing is and the
Speaker 1: you know, then they have their books out there on
Speaker 1: these tours and it's like and everybody's talk show. It's like,
Speaker 1: come on, man, there.
Speaker 2: Was one thousand personalities that came out and are now
Speaker 2: fairly well known because of COVID, and I don't trust
Speaker 2: any of them.
Speaker 1: Doing when I would say that I probably think is
Speaker 1: a legitimate human being. Out of that, it would be
Speaker 1: Gudie Mike Evics and she got she got put in
Speaker 1: in the slammer, and that would be kind of hard
Speaker 1: to uh. I don't know. It's still again like I
Speaker 1: have my doubts about everybody, but.
Speaker 2: Well, Assange Snowden. These guys, guys are fake. They're controlled,
Speaker 2: and they've they've this whole narrative of Assange being in
Speaker 2: captivity or isolation for all of this time is total bs.
Speaker 2: I don't buy any of it. I think that he's
Speaker 2: he's a plant too. I mean, we still have Wikipedia.
Speaker 2: We still go to Wikipedia for a lot of material
Speaker 2: and information. Pardon, do you mean Wiki leaks?
Speaker 1: That was a singe. Wikipedia is the thing that you
Speaker 1: get under your computer every time you do a search.
Speaker 2: They're not related. No really, yeah no, well I'm figuring
Speaker 2: that out now. So Wikipedia I don't have a problem
Speaker 2: with necessarily, I mean, it does have its own issues,
Speaker 2: but the one thing that it has that you know,
Speaker 2: the mainstream doesn't his sources. Mainstream will never show you
Speaker 2: sources at least Wikipedia does, and you can chase those
Speaker 2: sources for yourself, and you can find the truth largely
Speaker 2: through there.
Speaker 1: You can get a baseline and then you can go
Speaker 1: into more research and figure out where where they were
Speaker 1: steering you wrong.
Speaker 2: Yep. You go into the primary sources as much as
Speaker 2: you can. Wikipedia is a great place to go for
Speaker 2: the general story, whether it's fully true or not. This
Speaker 2: is you know, how I've done my research, Yeah.
Speaker 1: With proper conclusions, so it's not like you're being misled
Speaker 1: by them for that.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And so in twenty twelve, the whooping cough, this
Speaker 2: is a huge thing too, but New York Times I've
Speaker 2: got it receipts and everybody, every doctor will talk to
Speaker 2: you about the twenty twelve whooping cough as a total hoax.
Speaker 2: But it scared a bunch of people. We've talked about
Speaker 2: the nineteen eighteen Spanish flu yep, and fort and Dix, right,
Speaker 2: these are all this. There is a definite pattern we
Speaker 2: see where the mainstream tells you that these things have
Speaker 2: occurred and originated from certain places. Are implied that they
Speaker 2: do like the Spanish flu, but they're really you know,
Speaker 2: of the spread of this is about his center to
Speaker 2: America as possible.
Speaker 1: The type of things that were happening able to black
Speaker 1: black thicketing of their blood. They were turning weird colors
Speaker 1: from their dye. That was none of that happens from
Speaker 1: anything but a massive poisoning. And they were telling people
Speaker 1: that you better go get this, you know, multi shot
Speaker 1: because the people coming back from the war are lousy
Speaker 1: with all kinds of things from Europe, so they were
Speaker 1: getting a bunch of people that did take the shot.
Speaker 1: It was a vaccine holocaust based another fear push on that.
Speaker 1: It's pretty I mean looking back at that and seeing
Speaker 1: that the nurses were walking around and nothing happened to
Speaker 1: them because they weren't shot up, and they're walking around
Speaker 1: all these people that are dropping dead, most a lot
Speaker 1: of them military obviously, but like fifty million people give
Speaker 1: or take died because of that. Yeah, So I would
Speaker 1: say that's a good culling.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and COVID I would say it's very similar to
Speaker 2: to the seventy six swine flu and that there wasn't
Speaker 2: really any.
Speaker 1: Confusion in case.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there wasn't a case.
Speaker 1: It was a pig in freaking UK and that was
Speaker 1: their excuse. There's a launch of that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you can talk to mainstream television watchers and they'll
Speaker 2: be appalled at you saying that, but it's true.
Speaker 1: There's probably a mineral efficiency in their feed that made
Speaker 1: them ill in the first place, and like, oh, it's
Speaker 1: a sure right.
Speaker 2: So you know, I've come on on these Wednesdays and
Speaker 2: it's been great to you know, further elaborate on the
Speaker 2: idea of the rise of the expert and what it
Speaker 2: looks like today and sort of how it machinates in
Speaker 2: our society and the words that they're using.
Speaker 1: Yeah, for sure, we showed, we showed how it happened.
Speaker 1: Now we're showing the an application of that, of that
Speaker 1: scheme and in a more present day time.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and you can still see the progressive language in
Speaker 2: all of it. You know, the advancement of technology, this
Speaker 2: Operation Warp Speed that Trump had unveiled, and it was
Speaker 2: a race to technology and it wasn't You couldn't be
Speaker 2: more progressive really in the implementation of this COVID narrative.
Speaker 2: And so you hear all kinds of the same language
Speaker 2: being bandied about like preparedness and efficiency of government, and
Speaker 2: those are the two main pillars of progressivism. Over one
Speaker 2: hundred years after it infiltrated America with the New World Order,
Speaker 2: here we are still Biden's build back better. You know,
Speaker 2: all of it, regardless, is all a progressive narrative. You know,
Speaker 2: you could call it imperialism. You know, there's a lot
Speaker 2: of parallels between imperial you know, British and American imperialism,
Speaker 2: French Dutch colonialism, zionism, you know, corporatism. In fact, they
Speaker 2: all want to dominate the world. So you can see
Speaker 2: a total aligning paralleling of all of these institutions and
Speaker 2: organizations of which Brandeis had a huge role in creating. Right,
Speaker 2: he helped establish probably the most important figure in creating
Speaker 2: the administrative state, and what do we really call that colloquially,
Speaker 2: but the welfare state, the nanny state. And where are
Speaker 2: we today. We're a step or two away from universal
Speaker 2: basic income. Yeah, and there's the takeover of America.
Speaker 1: There's a varied definition of mercantilism that Hamilton and I'm
Speaker 1: glad he got shot, by the way, good job, Edinbarar.
Speaker 1: He was pushing for this idea of mercantilism where its
Speaker 1: permits interestingly enough, and only the special boys that the government,
Speaker 1: the federal government because he was a federalist allowed into business,
Speaker 1: would be at the top to run any type of industry. Well,
Speaker 1: we'd have that they consolidate things. COVID was a way
Speaker 1: that lockdowns were a way to knock out the small businessman,
Speaker 1: the entrepreneur, the independent people that they don't want to
Speaker 1: be independent, put things like Amazon growing even bigger than
Speaker 1: they were before. But all that was created artificially too,
Speaker 1: because when you look at it, they place the people.
Speaker 1: These aren't magical people who have an ability to sell
Speaker 1: shit online better than you. It's because they had an
Speaker 1: unlimited funds to undercut a whole lot of other businesses,
Speaker 1: put them in the dirt, and then they take their
Speaker 1: their their market share because the money is fake. And
Speaker 1: if they're tied in with people like the Rothschilds, they
Speaker 1: can give them whatever they need to overcome any competition,
Speaker 1: so they can they can lose, lose, lose, lose money
Speaker 1: for however long it takes to starve out the other guy,
Speaker 1: because he can always undercut that person until they're out
Speaker 1: of business and that's what that's That is the story
Speaker 1: of Amazon, period. Like there's no rational way that that
Speaker 1: was a natural progression if you look at it, like
Speaker 1: the way they took out other businesses, diapers, dot Com,
Speaker 1: all these places. They just undercut them so severely and
Speaker 1: then they'd raise their prices later. But they already have
Speaker 1: that market share now, right.
Speaker 2: And so we saw yeah, and we saw that in
Speaker 2: the dot com crash. Right, these are the these are
Speaker 2: the companies that rose out of the dot com crash.
Speaker 2: They're really the only survivors of it.
Speaker 1: And and you know there was a solidation right there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, scorched Earth everywhere else but up Pops, Yahoo, Google.
Speaker 1: Yeah, market find and as long as you're on their side,
Speaker 1: otherwise they're going to be targeted to be for destruction.
Speaker 1: You can play the game a little while and only
Speaker 1: get so big, but eventually they're going to cut you
Speaker 1: down too.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So that is kind of how that's a that's
Speaker 2: a great conversation on the scientific expert in the scientific community.
Speaker 2: But we want to show how this opinion of the
Speaker 2: expert actually goes through every aspect of our life. And
Speaker 2: we've been doing that, but I wanted to show a
Speaker 2: little bit. If we've got some time, we've got something.
Speaker 2: We've been going out this about an hour. Yeah, how
Speaker 2: Hollywood was created because Hollywood is a necessary aspect to
Speaker 2: all of this.
Speaker 1: This is media. Got to have that media that influence.
Speaker 2: Yes, you have to have, you know, Walter Lippmann call
Speaker 2: talked about a pseudo environment that they needed to create.
Speaker 2: It was as close to reality as they could because
Speaker 2: then people wouldn't be able to delineate between the two.
Speaker 2: And so we've already seen Kerrie Mollis talk about how
Speaker 2: the sheep can't really tell which one's a good expert
Speaker 2: and which one's a bad one when they're both declared experts.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that study on the human mind that even if
Speaker 1: you're watching something chemically and emotionally, you're it's like you're
Speaker 1: going through the same thing. So if they're showing you
Speaker 1: traumatic things and you're you, it affects you that way.
Speaker 1: If they're showing you anything, you actually associate and you
Speaker 1: relate with it because of our innate human nature for empathy.
Speaker 1: So they can play with those emotions and drive you
Speaker 1: different directions that they want to take you.
Speaker 2: And it's our liberal sentimentality that the New World order
Speaker 2: entered into our our western world, just like you have
Speaker 2: to invite a vampire into your house. This is really
Speaker 2: how it happened through our liberal sentimentality.
Speaker 1: Yeah, let me I remember Buffy the vampire. Let me in.
Speaker 2: So we talked. I have an article called Hidden in
Speaker 2: the Shadow of the Sun. And I'm not sure if
Speaker 2: we've gone through that the film noir horror introduction into
Speaker 2: society through Hollywood.
Speaker 1: I think you mentioned it. I don't think we got
Speaker 1: into it.
Speaker 2: Okay, so we've gone deep into that. You can go
Speaker 2: to Bulletproof pub dot com and check that out. I
Speaker 2: actually want to change the name now because of I
Speaker 2: rewatched this hollywoodsm in over the last couple of days
Speaker 2: and he uses a term in their shadow America, and
Speaker 2: this is really what Hollywood does is creates a shadow America,
Speaker 2: a suit environment, and so I would rather actually name
Speaker 2: that article shadow of America. Now it's a little easier
Speaker 2: than Hidden in the Shadow of the Sun. But what
Speaker 2: it shows is that you know all this Huxley's writing
Speaker 2: A Brave New World in scenario Sumra South of France
Speaker 2: in nineteen thirty nineteen twenty nine, nineteen thirty thirty one.
Speaker 2: You know at the end of the Great Depression, just
Speaker 2: before the turn of Hitler, the Rise of Hitler, and
Speaker 2: these Marxists, these exiles that are fleeing Germany at that time,
Speaker 2: are living in the same small south of France, little
Speaker 2: village scenario Sumer with Huxley as he's writing A Brave
Speaker 2: New World. And then they all go within the next
Speaker 2: seven years, that's to Hollywood and live together in the
Speaker 2: Pacific Palisades, all within a mile or two of each other.
Speaker 1: I'm not even kidding, you know, it's funny that they
Speaker 1: did replay that with the military intelligence in Little Canyon.
Speaker 1: They do this all the time. They s they trained
Speaker 1: and bring everybody over, and train and bring everybody over,
Speaker 1: and I have so when people talk about paper Clip,
Speaker 1: this is another thing I want to submit for people's perusal,
Speaker 1: is that those people were already agents of either the
Speaker 1: Roman Catholic Empire, Jesuits, Jesuits, or in fact, you know,
Speaker 1: cryptosionists who were working in that field. So when they
Speaker 1: took them over to save them from what they were
Speaker 1: going to do to everybody else, I think they were
Speaker 1: already there. You know, they were already involved in They
Speaker 1: already had they were already are people. So you're talking,
Speaker 1: Laurel Canyon, I always talking about paper clip at that point.
Speaker 2: Oh, operation paper for sure.
Speaker 1: I think a lot of those people were already plants
Speaker 1: that were in the right to keep an eye on them.
Speaker 1: And also, you know, they had the opportunity there to
Speaker 1: do whatever they were going to do. But when they
Speaker 1: were brought them over, I don't think it was because
Speaker 1: they were being so much. They were just changing stations.
Speaker 1: In my opinion, sure.
Speaker 2: Well, they were bringing the best and brightest over. Those
Speaker 2: men had really accomplished some things. And so the technology
Speaker 2: or the uh, oh you want to hear some ship.
Speaker 1: Look, I just got sorry for me to cut you off,
Speaker 1: but it says, hello, this is a southern Arizona Via
Speaker 1: healthcare system. We have drive through flu shots available on
Speaker 1: the fucking perfect time. There's the scientific expert entering your life.
Speaker 2: Through our phone. Another key aspect, probably more important than
Speaker 2: the television now and in fact, the story is that
Speaker 2: the creator of the founder of Apple what's his name again, Oh,
Speaker 2: Steve johncon Yeah, Steve Jobs, said that he was busy
Speaker 2: in uh creating the iPad, but as soon as they
Speaker 2: had the technology to get into an iPhone, he abandoned
Speaker 2: all of that research and became the head of the
Speaker 2: research into the creation of the phone.
Speaker 1: HM.
Speaker 2: So you know, the phone is an incredibly important, almost
Speaker 2: omniscient authority over our lives now.
Speaker 1: Mediation way they can connect to the W band coming soon, biometrics,
Speaker 1: the fact that it's tracking device, something that's multifunction. Really
Speaker 1: think you don't use it for is to call people
Speaker 1: at this point, you know exactly.
Speaker 2: And it helps establish this pseudo environment because people are
Speaker 2: constantly stuck to their phones. If there's a minute where
Speaker 2: they got to stand around, they're on the phone, and
Speaker 2: that's a great place to fill their heads with pseudo information.
Speaker 1: It definitely alters the breakways. It definitely alters your perception
Speaker 1: of reality. It takes you from your family, it breaks
Speaker 1: the bonds down. It's all kinds of yep.
Speaker 2: So you talked about, you know, parallels there.
Speaker 1: People don't talk to each other the laurel.
Speaker 2: Yeah, this is you know, this is what Carrie Mals said. Communication.
Speaker 2: We need more communication, and that is one of the
Speaker 2: major downfalls of us right now. It's one of our
Speaker 2: major weaknesses is that we don't we don't know how
Speaker 2: to properly communicate. First of all right, we're too largely
Speaker 2: built today on emotion and we're very reactionary triggers.
Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, and so why is that?
Speaker 2: Well, the media, the media really is creating this pseudo
Speaker 2: environment in which you now there's three hundred million Americans.
Speaker 2: I'd say a large portion of those fear of the future.
Speaker 2: Whether you're Christian, conspiracy theorist, or whatever, everybody's in this
Speaker 2: fear of the future mentality. When you need to break
Speaker 2: out of that and get productive in the right orientation,
Speaker 2: do some things to help us along here.
Speaker 1: Don't just wait for life to start. Start your life.
Speaker 2: You know, there's no saviors coming. If you want to
Speaker 2: save your family, you are the one.
Speaker 1: And once you and once you get things settled in
Speaker 1: your mind and you say, okay, well this is the
Speaker 1: best I can prepare, then go about your day. Don't
Speaker 1: sit there waiting with like like a person at a bunker,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. Live your life, but just
Speaker 1: be just be aware and much as you can about
Speaker 1: the dangers that are out there. Don't eat the crpt
Speaker 1: that process food, don't drink from your tap, you know,
Speaker 1: and just do things like that. Don't subject yourself to
Speaker 1: chemicals that are unnecessary, and you can avoid a lot
Speaker 1: of it, but you can't avoid all of it. It's
Speaker 1: just gonna happen. You just got to make sure that
Speaker 1: you're healthy and neutrified so that it doesn't break you down.
Speaker 1: Make sure that your children are and shit too. Don't
Speaker 1: let your wife bringing under McDonald's every goddamn day.
Speaker 15: You know.
Speaker 2: Yes, So let's throw this Hollywood as a movie on
Speaker 2: for a second. And they explain the origins of Hollywood here,
Speaker 2: So for those that are unfamiliar with this movie, it's
Speaker 2: the story of the origins of Hollywood and the original
Speaker 2: five or six Hollywood producers.
Speaker 1: It's the Jews from where they came from.
Speaker 2: And yeah it is. They're all Jewish. They're all coming
Speaker 2: from this same area in Central Europe, the Pale Up Settlement.
Speaker 2: They're all within, like one of the biographers stated here,
Speaker 2: within fifty miles of each other. And they moved to
Speaker 2: Los Angeles and they live within fifteen miles of each other.
Speaker 2: So you can see that this is a repeated pattern
Speaker 2: that we saw with Huxley, but also in the very
Speaker 2: creation of Hollywood.
Speaker 1: Very early on, there was a high concentration of Italians
Speaker 1: in Hollywood, running the show. And I like how Bill
Speaker 1: Cooper said one time, it's like when he's told that
Speaker 1: the Jews own everything, He's like, well, who sold it
Speaker 1: to them? Buy their stock? And I thought that it
Speaker 1: was funny. But when you realize that they have unlimited
Speaker 1: funds to acquire because of the system that's being run
Speaker 1: by Francis Zionist bankers, that it's not exactly a fair
Speaker 1: a fair assessment because they're going to be able to
Speaker 1: outbid you anyway, regardless of whether you're going to sell
Speaker 1: it to them or not. They'll just put you under
Speaker 1: if you're not going to sell.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And so they talk about the American dream and
Speaker 2: how these guys actually create the image in our minds
Speaker 2: of the American dream. And this almost overlaps exactly with
Speaker 2: Herbert Crowley's promise of American life.
Speaker 1: Herbert Curley, Yeah, Herbert Crowley is I think I've heard
Speaker 1: you mentioned it before.
Speaker 2: I got he's no connection to Oh, I know Alistair
Speaker 2: spelt different, but he's he's one of the founders of
Speaker 2: the New Republic magazine. He's a resident at the House
Speaker 2: of Truth. He's a close friend of all of these guys.
Speaker 2: He's the one that gets James T. Shott well together
Speaker 2: to start bringing all these scholarly professors to the creation
Speaker 2: of the CFR. He's there, but he.
Speaker 1: Writes about Tom Hopkins sometime too, because that university has
Speaker 1: John Hopkins. That that that is one of the one
Speaker 1: of the lynch pins too.
Speaker 2: Yep, we can get into that next week too, because
Speaker 2: I've written this. One of the articles I think that
Speaker 2: you've read it as well is the Rise of the University,
Speaker 2: and so it explains all of that in there.
Speaker 1: And I'll pick up some Professor Hamamoto clips if I can,
Speaker 1: if I can whittle it down, because he talks about
Speaker 1: a lot, because he talks about the land grants for
Speaker 1: these universities. Yes, that's the Marill Land grant.
Speaker 2: Axe. And I have some quotes at the end, like
Speaker 2: we shared at the end of last show last week.
Speaker 2: I've got five or six quotes here lined up for
Speaker 2: the end of the show.
Speaker 4: Known as the father of the feature length film, spent
Speaker 4: his childhood in this Jewish village. Surprise, but you know,
Speaker 4: American cowboys but Jewish.
Speaker 14: What is.
Speaker 2: Thinking about? What is America?
Speaker 1: What a handsome man I live a flahab.
Speaker 4: Modern America first saw light on a Hollywood screen It
Speaker 4: was largely the product of six movie studios established in
Speaker 4: the nineteen twenties and run for over thirty years by
Speaker 4: a group of Jewish immigrants. They had strikingly similar backgrounds.
Speaker 10: Alrasis and religion.
Speaker 8: That's a merri.
Speaker 2: Melting pot. Is America to him?
Speaker 14: Right?
Speaker 1: Second, that's a good point. Right, So is that really America?
Speaker 1: Or was it settled by Europeans?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: You know what I mean? You can put it back
Speaker 1: up there, you go, okay, go ahead, or you can
Speaker 1: what are you going to say something like that? That's cool.
Speaker 2: No, I wasn't. But I got to just find where
Speaker 2: I am again.
Speaker 1: That's it's it's it's it's it was. It was propaganda
Speaker 1: right there, just in that one statement, you know, in
Speaker 1: religion every you know, that's not really true. It was
Speaker 1: Europeans settled. I mean that's fine. Yep, it's fine. But
Speaker 1: I mean at some point you got to put the
Speaker 1: plug in the in the bottle.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And the issue, yeah, and the issue we have
Speaker 2: today is that you know a lot of the large
Speaker 2: part of the immigration don't have parallels with our traditions
Speaker 2: and values. They don't actually read the same religious books.
Speaker 2: It isn't actually a good match.
Speaker 1: And that's yeah.
Speaker 2: Previously it was because you know, Irish and whoever was
Speaker 2: coming from Europe were white.
Speaker 1: And it's funny, there was a time when the Irish
Speaker 1: people are freaking, you know, racially condemned and all that.
Speaker 1: And then you see that in Gangs in New York
Speaker 1: a little bit the movie. You though it's the movie,
Speaker 1: you get a slight taste of it. But that's how
Speaker 1: funny that is, right, And we went from that to
Speaker 1: where we are now, the erosion.
Speaker 16: Yes, we're born within a five hundred mile radius or
Speaker 16: one another. All of them wound up roughly within fifteen
Speaker 16: miles of one another in Los Angeles. One could say
Speaker 16: that the American dream was really born in Eastern Europe.
Speaker 1: Now that's something, and it just goes to the background
Speaker 1: of all of these guys for minutes. Let it run.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, here we are.
Speaker 7: This is the Warner Studio.
Speaker 6: Yee, I've never been so thrilled.
Speaker 13: In All Mine night.
Speaker 4: Harry Warner, who with three of his brothers brought sound
Speaker 4: to the motion picture, was born in Poland.
Speaker 17: I was Jack Warner, youngest of the Warner clan, and
Speaker 17: then the singer Membro perel.
Speaker 4: Bain brother also from Poland was Samuel Goldwyn born Goldfish.
Speaker 4: Though Goldwyn never ran a major studio, he was perhaps
Speaker 4: the biggest and best known of the independent Hollywood producers.
Speaker 4: Met Wildemir Universal founder Karl Lemley name from a small
Speaker 4: town in Germany. Louis B. Mayer, who gave us the
Speaker 4: glory years of the MGM studio, was born in a
Speaker 4: Russian Jewish village. William Fox and paramounts Adult Zucker were
Speaker 4: both born in Hungary. Fox's studio merged with twentieth Century
Speaker 4: Pictures to form twentieth Century Fox.
Speaker 2: Here I'm at all go go.
Speaker 7: The president of Paramount.
Speaker 4: Picture, Zukor, known as the father of the feature length film,
Speaker 4: spent his childhood in this Jewish village. Prior to the
Speaker 4: twentieth century, most Eastern European Jews were forced to live
Speaker 4: in poor villages called schtettles without a homeland. They lived
Speaker 4: in marginal existence at the sufferance of the Russian.
Speaker 1: That's will gematic.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so we're they're saying that they're coming from different countries.
Speaker 2: They're Hungary and Germany, but they're all within fifty miles
Speaker 2: of each other, and they're in what was called the
Speaker 2: pale Off Settlement the Central European borders, in which this
Speaker 2: is where all of the Jewish people were pushed by
Speaker 2: the Russian uh Empire.
Speaker 1: And here's the funny thing where there's the reason why
Speaker 1: they were that was a thing in the first place,
Speaker 1: not because they were wholesome, happy go lucky people. It's
Speaker 1: because they were subversive and causing trouble. So that was
Speaker 1: a response. It was a it was a cause and
Speaker 1: effect reasoning there and timing I find interesting because it
Speaker 1: was after the Bolshevik revolution that boom Hollywood Hollywood is invaded, right, Yeah.
Speaker 2: So here's another excerpt regarding them and them changing their names.
Speaker 1: Mmm, this is called Hollywood Is And where where do
Speaker 1: you find this?
Speaker 4: Uh?
Speaker 8: I can?
Speaker 2: You can get it actually on YouTube?
Speaker 1: Okay, cool.
Speaker 2: It never used to be, but over the last year
Speaker 2: or something that's been allowed to be on there. Usually
Speaker 2: you got to go to bit shoot to find it. Cool.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna go ahead and watch them.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's actually quite incredible. Encourage everybody to go check
Speaker 2: it out. It just really.
Speaker 1: Feel free to do do long clips.
Speaker 10: I did.
Speaker 1: If I come up with something I can just read out.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna let her run from here for a couple
Speaker 2: of minutes. Here in the story of how they.
Speaker 18: Changed their names on purpose, and Uh, I was going
Speaker 18: to public school, and my mother said, in case somebody
Speaker 18: asked you what your religion is, you're Jewish, and uh,
Speaker 18: I said, okay, you know, I mean I.
Speaker 2: Didn't you know. I don't think I even asked, well,
Speaker 2: what's that?
Speaker 15: You know?
Speaker 8: I was brought up by Catholic governesses who took me
Speaker 8: to the Catholic churches and I learned. I learned their
Speaker 8: prayers in French, and I wore across.
Speaker 1: And it doesn't mean you went a jesuit, just saying yeah.
Speaker 8: No, no, It's just that I didn't know anything about
Speaker 8: the Jewish religion. I didn't know what it was.
Speaker 2: So that's family members not even knowing, right, these guys.
Speaker 1: Kept realized that my father had never.
Speaker 7: Jewish.
Speaker 15: But I didn't even know what his real name was,
Speaker 15: what was the village that he came from. I knew
Speaker 15: nothing about his life, and I realized that the name
Speaker 15: Warner was probably not correct, but I thought, being polished,
Speaker 15: it might have been Werner. To this day, I really
Speaker 15: don't know what our original name was.
Speaker 4: Often the first thing to Go was the Jewish name.
Speaker 4: The Hollywood Jews were obsessed with erasing anything Jewish in
Speaker 4: their films, their lives.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and why is that? Because they are.
Speaker 7: Victoria Blatchet.
Speaker 2: Hey, we'll have to do something about that right away.
Speaker 4: Theodosia Goodman became Theda Baron. Sophia Cosso became Sylvia Sidney,
Speaker 4: Mister Danielovitch Deemsky became Kirk. Douglas Jacobi became Lee J. Cobb,
Speaker 4: Treley Shrift became Shelley Winters. Bernard Schwartz became Tony Curtis.
Speaker 4: David Kaminski became Danny Kay, Edward Isskovitz became Eddie Canter.
Speaker 4: Melvin Hesselberg became Melvin Douglas Muni Wisenfreud, the star of
Speaker 4: the Yiddish Theater, became Paul Muni. Emmanuel Goldenburg became Edward G. Robinson.
Speaker 4: The G was a reminder of who he really was.
Speaker 1: Holy shit.
Speaker 4: Nice Jewish girls such as Lily Palmer, Julie Holliday, and
Speaker 4: Lauren Bacall or Betty Persky helped to define the.
Speaker 2: American Paul Betty Persky.
Speaker 4: Not all the Jewish town on went to Hollywood to assimilate.
Speaker 4: There were over fifty non Hollywood Yiddish films produced in
Speaker 4: New York before the Second World War.
Speaker 17: Trouve Trove that has half conveying you say trouble had glen.
Speaker 4: It's These films were the flip side of the Hollywood movies.
Speaker 1: Sorry reading it is snapping, grabbing what they can, the grabblers.
Speaker 1: I just thought that was funny.
Speaker 2: Yes, pretasterious, and it rings true today to write the
Speaker 2: same same narrative that we're in trouble. Lots of things
Speaker 2: politically wrong in our society.
Speaker 4: Top hat gentility. Many who could have gone to Hollywood
Speaker 4: stayed in New York to make films that expressed their
Speaker 4: Jewish identity.
Speaker 19: These films were shown to an audience which was almost
Speaker 19: entirely made up of immigrants and sometimes the children of immigrants,
Speaker 19: and these films by and large had a very very
Speaker 19: different point.
Speaker 1: Of view than Hollywood movies.
Speaker 20: I mean, the Yiddish movies were kind of fighting a
Speaker 20: rearguard action to protect certain forms of Jewish cultural expression
Speaker 20: against the sort of overwhelming seductive power of the larger
Speaker 20: American culture.
Speaker 4: In this classic of Yiddish cinema, a great Canter played
Speaker 4: by moishe Isiser is drawn into the secular world of opera.
Speaker 4: On the night of his operatic debut, he learns of
Speaker 4: his death. Unable to perform, he returns to a synagogue
Speaker 4: to lead the high Holiday prayers. Heartbroken, he dies here.
Speaker 4: The attempt to reconcile Jewish and secular worlds ends tragically.
Speaker 1: A man, you ain't heard nothing yet, you ain't heard nothing.
Speaker 4: Goodbye, Warner Brothers. The Jazz Singer was a revolutionary silent
Speaker 4: film that broke into sound with each musical number. Here,
Speaker 4: as in the Yiddish film, A canter Son played by
Speaker 4: Al Jolson, who was in real life a canter Son
Speaker 4: has to choose between American fame and Jewish loyalty.
Speaker 2: Okay, and you know we see this narrative playing out
Speaker 2: in Bambi, in all kinds of Disney movies. The underlying
Speaker 2: narrative is the story of the jew This is all
Speaker 2: admitted too. It's not a conspiracy theory to say that
Speaker 2: I could show you Sarah Silverman on the Tonight Show
Speaker 2: admitting all of it, including how they've written all of
Speaker 2: our Christmas carols and created all of our superheroes.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, and you know it's a you know, it's pretty funny.
Speaker 1: Do you remember an American tale with five of moscowitz
Speaker 1: there are no cats in America?
Speaker 15: Yeah?
Speaker 8: That song?
Speaker 1: Oh you should check it out. It's about Russian immigrant mice.
Speaker 1: Remind me of America, I will. It's called an American tale, Okay.
Speaker 1: Because the Jews don't want to stand out.
Speaker 4: The Jewish fear of standing out was expressed to another
Speaker 4: icon that would make its way to the screen.
Speaker 19: Superman was invented by two Jewish kids in the late
Speaker 19: nineteen thirties when they're also was a.
Speaker 4: A worldwash upsurge in very frightening anti Semitism.
Speaker 2: And so every time that that word is used, we
Speaker 2: have to find there's seventy seven branches of Semitic speaking
Speaker 2: people in that region. The Hebrew is one of the
Speaker 2: smallest populations. The largest population of Semitic speaking people there
Speaker 2: the Arab at over half a billion. Right, So it's
Speaker 2: not anti Semitic, antid sorry, it's anti child killing, son
Speaker 2: of a bitch. He kind of get upset like that.
Speaker 2: We're just being critical, that's all right, We're just we're
Speaker 2: being critical of them as we are critical of other
Speaker 2: institutions and groups of people in our investigation. There's no
Speaker 2: difference in how we're treating them as we are treating
Speaker 2: you know, Canadian Quakers or you know, American born and
Speaker 2: bred apple pie figures, you know, And.
Speaker 1: If you observe them, then you're then you're an anti
Speaker 1: this or that, just because you observe what you can
Speaker 1: see and what you can read, you know, and that.
Speaker 2: Is deductive, right to just observe and to analyze what
Speaker 2: you see and then determine from that what the conclusions
Speaker 2: are going to be. But to approach this research to
Speaker 2: vilify the jew would be inductive in many ways. Especially
Speaker 2: when I first started. All we ever did was want
Speaker 2: to find the truth. And so, you know, we find
Speaker 2: certain things out along the way. Grint from another planet
Speaker 2: who comes to Earth, an alien from another planet, comes
Speaker 2: in this Jewish.
Speaker 20: Chool, but really underneath he's the Man of Steel.
Speaker 4: I think that's a very easy Jewishness. It's almost as
Speaker 4: if he's passing all the time. While the Jew felt
Speaker 4: like an alien in America, Superman was a real alien.
Speaker 2: This looks like a job for Superman.
Speaker 4: Yet incredibly, he is the only superhero who manages to
Speaker 4: keep his a debity secret without wearing a mask. Only
Speaker 4: Jews could have created a story based on the premise
Speaker 4: that all one needs is a gentile demeanor to hide
Speaker 4: in plain sight.
Speaker 7: I bet you recognized him. Why of course you recognize him.
Speaker 7: It's an Annoyd think.
Speaker 4: Like Superman. The Hollywood were unwilling to risk their gentile disguise.
Speaker 4: As a result, only two anti Nazi films were made
Speaker 4: before the war. Charlie Trumplan financed and made the classic
Speaker 4: film The Great Dictator.
Speaker 1: They were zig hailing when when the transfer agreement was
Speaker 1: going on, the Jews in America zig hailing the it's
Speaker 1: Hitler because of his working with designists to get them
Speaker 1: out of their country. So I don't want to I
Speaker 1: don't want to hear you nonsense about how there he's
Speaker 1: the big bad guy now.
Speaker 7: Right, so.
Speaker 1: You can see somebody else showed me that, and I
Speaker 1: was like, yeah, well it makes sense, and.
Speaker 2: This might be a good time to just sort of
Speaker 2: jump over to one of our articles. Yeah, Hidden in
Speaker 2: the Shadow of the Sun, in which or or the
Speaker 2: exhilarat or or how Huxley hijacked Hollywood, either one of
Speaker 2: all three of those articles. I think we talk about
Speaker 2: the milieu, this group of Marxists that are hanging around
Speaker 2: in La Well, Charlie Chaplin is involved in all of it.
Speaker 2: M hm, so we see him uh being involved. He's
Speaker 2: financing and producing one of the first anti Nazi films. Well,
Speaker 2: he's hanging out at these political salons with all this. Huxley,
Speaker 2: Theodore Adorno, Max Horkheimer, the founders of critical theory.
Speaker 1: Yep. Critical.
Speaker 2: So you have to ask yourself, you know what's going
Speaker 2: on there? So can you see hidden in the shadow
Speaker 2: of the sun?
Speaker 1: Now, no, you have I think the other screenkang on,
Speaker 1: So you have to do the entire one it's called
Speaker 1: and then if you need audio. I don't think you
Speaker 1: need audio though, same same same method, it's just it
Speaker 1: sticks on the same thing. If you don't do the
Speaker 1: entire screen. Share screen. So it's the far right line.
Speaker 1: You click that click, the sits there and then you
Speaker 1: hit here.
Speaker 2: Let's see.
Speaker 1: Then I should just pop it all up. You won't
Speaker 1: be able to see much. But now you're seeing this,
Speaker 1: you're seeing the stream that you're on. And then we're
Speaker 1: in at Doller Tex. And then you just jump onto
Speaker 1: your VP and you'll it'll be there.
Speaker 2: And then I jump onto my BP.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well you're the page that you're gonna look at. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you're not there. You're not there, right there? Cool, and
Speaker 1: now we see it.
Speaker 2: Ok thank you. Okay, so we're just gonna quickly go
Speaker 2: through this. I've got about twenty minutes and then I
Speaker 2: gotta get back to the farm.
Speaker 1: Gotch it?
Speaker 2: So the Political Slans of Los Angeles was the subtitle.
Speaker 2: We get into this guy, Leon Fuckewanger. He creates, or
Speaker 2: he purchases, the Villa Aurora in the Pacific Palisades. It's
Speaker 2: the very first house ever built there. Here's a picture
Speaker 2: of him. This is one of the guys that's hanging
Speaker 2: out with all this Huxley in the thirties at scenario sumer. Okay,
Speaker 2: this is Pacific Palisades, him overlooking the Pacific Palsades. So
Speaker 2: this is before there's any other house there. They had
Speaker 2: this Villa Aurora, which was like a futuristic sample home
Speaker 2: in which they had the first dishwasher, the first automated
Speaker 2: card port doors, and all of those kinds of things. Okay,
Speaker 2: So him and his wife Marta Fuckwanger come over as
Speaker 2: exiles fleeing Hitler the rise of Nazism, and they create
Speaker 2: this political salon Leon Fuldwanger writes a book called The
Speaker 2: Opperman's and in the very first opening page he says,
Speaker 2: it is upon us to begin the work, it is
Speaker 2: not upon us to complete it. From the Talmud so
Speaker 2: you can see that they understand their role in this
Speaker 2: long game being played, and they understand that they're temporary
Speaker 2: player in it, and there is an agenda for them
Speaker 2: to achieve before they they pass on. And he explains
Speaker 2: it right there, it is upon us to begin the work,
Speaker 2: not to complete it. That would be on the generations
Speaker 2: that we are presently in today. Okay, well, here's villa
Speaker 2: or It's just an incredibly beautiful place. And I've got
Speaker 2: more pictures of it in the other articles as well.
Speaker 1: Right, sorry, I said too bad, it's cursed.
Speaker 2: Yeah, right, So what's amazing is it's actually today. Uh well,
Speaker 2: back then it was used even as a as a
Speaker 2: foreign student exchange program, and so these people would stay
Speaker 2: there and they would invite Marxists, you know, similar thinking
Speaker 2: people with the destruction of Western tradition on their minds.
Speaker 2: And today it is completely affiliated with the University of
Speaker 2: Southern California. You can see Footwanger Memorial Library. Yeah, and
Speaker 2: and so in the description of the website, on the
Speaker 2: website that I got this picture, it says exactly what
Speaker 2: I put here students of University of Southern California looking
Speaker 2: through primary sources. So he's totally affiliated to USC. You
Speaker 2: can see that the next generation of Marxist thinkers are
Speaker 2: very involved.
Speaker 1: In conditioned and brainwashed their programmed.
Speaker 2: Yeah, totally, and that's what that is. So Thomas Mann
Speaker 2: is another one of these Marxist exiles that were in
Speaker 2: the South of France with Huxley when he was writing
Speaker 2: A Brave New World. Huxley and Man are very close,
Speaker 2: both families very close. They walk their dogs together and
Speaker 2: they would walk up to check out sort of the
Speaker 2: updated stage in which their house was being built. So
Speaker 2: this is one of the things that they did nearly
Speaker 2: every day. They walked with each other and their dogs
Speaker 2: up to see their house being constructed. And this is
Speaker 2: his house today.
Speaker 1: If I've got a picture of it, can you go
Speaker 1: back to said they founded something in some kind of
Speaker 1: league called the Hollywood Anti Nazi something. It's on the
Speaker 1: Thomas Mann one, it's right here. It says the lecture
Speaker 1: at the shrine was organized by Hollywood Anti Nazi League,
Speaker 1: which used the auditorium for many of their events. The
Speaker 1: League was formed in nineteen thirty six during the Transfer
Speaker 1: Agreement by people from the film industry to fight the
Speaker 1: fascism and Nazism.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Thomas Mann played an important role because they considered
Speaker 2: him the first ever podcaster because at this time he
Speaker 2: is broadcasting by radio back inside the boundaries of Germany
Speaker 2: against the German government's wishes, and he's doing it out
Speaker 2: of university. I can't remember which one, but right there.
Speaker 2: So he's he's considered the first podcaster. And he was
Speaker 2: spreading anti Nazi propaganda, is what he was doing. So
Speaker 2: he also did a around America tour speaking engagement, and
Speaker 2: that's exactly what he was talking about. He was talking
Speaker 2: about the rise of Nazism. And so he's going even
Speaker 2: into Canada, but all of the major nodes of America
Speaker 2: he's going to. They do a lot of this with
Speaker 2: an early Zionist Rabbi Saunderling, So he's going to this
Speaker 2: place too to have speeches. This rabbi has made a
Speaker 2: veil to Thomas Mann, a place to speak and for
Speaker 2: people to congregate and listen to him. And you can
Speaker 2: see Charlie Chaplin moderated the English readings, so he's deeply involved,
Speaker 2: Charlie Chaplin in all of these Marxists in the infiltration
Speaker 2: of Hollywood. So Doctor Faustus is a book famously written
Speaker 2: by Thomas Mann in which the devil is a scientific
Speaker 2: expert with the bow tie, and everybody relates it to
Speaker 2: Theodore A. Darno. Okay, so if anybody's not familiar with Theodore,
Speaker 2: he is the founder of critical theory. But he's also
Speaker 2: the guy that's rumored to have worked with Tavistock and
Speaker 2: influenced the Beatles. No receipts on that, but that is
Speaker 2: sort of the rumor. There could definitely connections with Doorno
Speaker 2: to Tavistock and connections from Tavistock to the Beatles. But
Speaker 2: we just that would be an incredible finding if you
Speaker 2: could actually place a Dorno involved in the writing of
Speaker 2: Beatles music. We just have not been able to do that.
Speaker 2: So he's right, he's speaking through the BBC. So the
Speaker 2: BBC is somehow getting his voice heard in Germany. And
Speaker 2: here's an NBC studios this is where he was doing them. Okay.
Speaker 2: So another political salan was the one of Sulko Vertel
Speaker 2: these are considered intelligentsia. All of these people. They come
Speaker 2: from the same area as the Hollywood founders, the same
Speaker 2: area as Louis Brande Eyes the actual show.
Speaker 1: Sorry, the same area as we brandeis. I'm sure that's
Speaker 1: not a small point.
Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, So here's pictures of all of these guys
Speaker 2: and they go to Hollywood. They all become screenwriters. We
Speaker 2: list the movies that they're involved in and who they're
Speaker 2: you know, associating with. Huxley writes several screenwright plots or whatever.
Speaker 2: We're told Brect is important and that he helps write
Speaker 2: along with patches.
Speaker 1: Here cyclaps uh.
Speaker 2: Hangmen also die. And this is an anti Nazi Hollywood
Speaker 2: movie that's produced and shown at the same time in
Speaker 2: this same time period. Was it nineteen forty two?
Speaker 1: Okay, so it was before the because the reason why
Speaker 1: I'm asking is because I'm sure they're showing what they
Speaker 1: consider Nazi war criminals there and some in some aspects.
Speaker 1: So it's kind of funny that the the Puriam matches
Speaker 1: up with Nuremberg and they hung people at Nurberg, right,
Speaker 1: that's projecting the feature here.
Speaker 2: Good connection there, and all of these movies admitted now
Speaker 2: today is total propaganda, not a word of the truth
Speaker 2: in him dismal fabrications. Actually, Brecked called declared the movie
Speaker 2: a dismal fabrication himself. That's from Wymar on the Pacific
Speaker 2: Airhard Bar. I have that book on my bookshelf. It's
Speaker 2: a great source for this entire story. So this this
Speaker 2: guy's uh, it's his name, Fritz Lang.
Speaker 1: That's Fritz, the guy who did Metropolis.
Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, here we talk about Metropolis a little bit.
Speaker 2: You can see the the pentagram here pointing down and
Speaker 2: the creation of a woman in the form of a machine.
Speaker 2: If you have not seen Metropolis, I encourage everybody to go. Look,
Speaker 2: this is one of the first ever movies before there's
Speaker 2: even speaking in them.
Speaker 1: And yeah, make sure you get the one that's like
Speaker 1: two hours or forty minutes longer. Yeah, think at the time.
Speaker 1: Some of them are cut and it cuts out a
Speaker 1: lot of the stuff that you want to watch.
Speaker 2: Yes, like the factory turning into Moloch and all of
Speaker 2: the factory workers walking into Moloch's mouth just flames. And
Speaker 2: it's a great it's actually a great aspect to understanding
Speaker 2: our world. You need to watch Metropolis to start to
Speaker 2: really comprehend where they were coming from and why this
Speaker 2: was all created.
Speaker 1: And how they're using a woman, they're using the decoy.
Speaker 1: She's you know, someone that that was trusted, they put
Speaker 1: back into the community, controlled, and she's it's Ai. It's
Speaker 1: all the things that are playing right now happening.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And the lead character brings capital and labor together.
Speaker 2: That is the conclusion of the film.
Speaker 1: And who does that?
Speaker 2: But Louis brandeis in reality. So Metropolis today considered probably
Speaker 2: the best movie of all time by all kinds of moviegoers.
Speaker 1: Okay, so yeah, listen to this. M is the story
Speaker 1: of a serial murderer, and the audience is hold on,
Speaker 1: can you it?
Speaker 2: Oh? Sorry you were reading that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, it says is asked to sympathize with a
Speaker 1: pedophile unable to control his urges to kill. Tell me
Speaker 1: that's not a Jewish product all day long and verdict
Speaker 1: his level, levied film historian Yeah, charges the film noir
Speaker 1: genre was meant to foment sympathy for the devil.
Speaker 2: Yes, okay, Now, I am a fan of film noir.
Speaker 2: I love you know, Blade Runner and all those that
Speaker 2: genre of films that's neo noir. But uh, it's meant
Speaker 2: to degenerate our society, to demoralize us. As the word
Speaker 2: that they use. It's a demoralization program that is really
Speaker 2: one of the major aspects to the New World Order.
Speaker 1: I guess looking at Edward G. Robinson you could tell,
Speaker 1: but I was just surprised because he was like the
Speaker 1: gangster guy, you know what I mean. I was like,
Speaker 1: and he's the one that.
Speaker 2: He's the one that you know, produced the famous KKK
Speaker 2: movie that was redone just in the last five years
Speaker 2: here and created all kinds of a stir uh and
Speaker 2: I can't remember the name of it, but it is
Speaker 2: one of the most influential movies, most important ones to
Speaker 2: understand too. It's the plot line includes the klu Klux Klan.
Speaker 2: So the main objective of film nomar was disorientating the spectator,
Speaker 2: who can no longer find the familiar reference points lost
Speaker 2: in murky plot lines and the lives of him biguous
Speaker 2: lead characters. The resulting confusion and alienation were an intellectual
Speaker 2: dilemma that had to be solved. Elements of film noir
Speaker 2: go beyond that of a police documentary. The dark film
Speaker 2: series portrayed consistently the presence of crime. Nino Frank called
Speaker 2: it the dynamism of violent death. Film noir almost always
Speaker 2: told from within the criminal, forcing the viewer to consider
Speaker 2: their own morality. If the police are portrayed, they are
Speaker 2: rotten cops, and sympathy is built around the criminal milieu.
Speaker 2: It abandoned the adventure film convention of a fair fight,
Speaker 2: a sporting chance, has given way to settling scores beatings
Speaker 2: in cold blooded murders.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and that only comes out of a mind of
Speaker 1: the tumult type of person was Frank mind. Here's the
Speaker 1: other thing too, when you when you're talking about that,
Speaker 1: is they then were able to corrupt the the culture
Speaker 1: of America to make it so that the cops are
Speaker 1: the bad guys because they're folling the lead of what
Speaker 1: they're told to do and the do is being directed
Speaker 1: by them.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and so look at some of the early films
Speaker 2: that they created, Double Indemnity, that's where a husband apparently
Speaker 2: beats his wife for his abusive and she ends up
Speaker 2: killing him. And that again, is has been re released
Speaker 2: in the nineties very popular. And here we have Humphrey
Speaker 2: bog are very famous figures in Hollywood involved in these
Speaker 2: degenerative storylines, and so this is an important aspect here
Speaker 2: we got to understand is that we've got Alain Silver
Speaker 2: and James Ersini. They wrote this book Film Noir, a
Speaker 2: Reader in which they they get into this. This is
Speaker 2: a key source for us.
Speaker 1: His name is Silver, so he's one, yeah, yeah, right,
Speaker 1: So you know, but.
Speaker 2: We we consider the source material and what they're saying.
Speaker 2: And here he says, film Noir has renovated the theme
Speaker 2: of violence to begin with it, it bandoned the adventure
Speaker 2: film convention of a fair fight. So this is where
Speaker 2: I'm getting these sources from. Right, so you can know
Speaker 2: the movie go accustomed to certain conventions, the logical development
Speaker 2: of the action, a clear distinction between good and evil,
Speaker 2: well defined characters, sharp motives, scenes more showy than authentically violent,
Speaker 2: a beautiful heroine and an honest hero at least these
Speaker 2: were the conventions of American adventure films before the war.
Speaker 2: And that's generally true. And I'm not sure. I guess
Speaker 2: they're talking the Second World War, but you know, Hollywood
Speaker 2: was started even before the First World War. And we're
Speaker 2: seeing from the very get go degenerative anti human plot lines, storylines.
Speaker 1: Cultural erosion, destruction of yes.
Speaker 2: Probably, and this is one of the major aspects through Hollywood.
Speaker 1: This is the poison of the parasite we're looking at
Speaker 1: right here.
Speaker 2: Yes, so these are Frankfurt School leaders. Max Horkheimer was
Speaker 2: of it when they moved it over to Columbia University
Speaker 2: and it became the university in exile today just called
Speaker 2: the school or the university.
Speaker 1: And how funny is it the end? Well, the Palestinian protests,
Speaker 1: pro protests happened in Columbia. Uh ye, not because it's
Speaker 1: not controlled opposition or you know what I mean. Control
Speaker 1: They want they want to give that impression so that
Speaker 1: there's actually, by what do they call it, reverse psychology,
Speaker 1: garner more support for Israel. And you know, here's the
Speaker 1: thing too. I wanted to bring up about the klu
Speaker 1: Klux Klan. People think that originated by a bunch of
Speaker 1: racist white people. It was out of the Freemasonic Order,
Speaker 1: which is a Kabbalistic secret society, and they were developed
Speaker 1: because they always they always create these opposing forces so
Speaker 1: they have something to point at when they're showing that
Speaker 1: there's racism and stuff like that. So this the KKK
Speaker 1: came out of that, and there was actually some people
Speaker 1: who actually believed in the cause of you know, hey,
Speaker 1: these guys are raping and killing people, maybe we should
Speaker 1: put an end to it and lynch a few of them.
Speaker 1: But there's also that aspect that I mean Ben A
Speaker 1: Brith basically was involved in the creation of it.
Speaker 2: Yes, right, So the and you're talking about the origins
Speaker 2: of you know, foreign policy, it's created by the KKK
Speaker 2: as well. So I would encourage everybody to investigate the
Speaker 2: United States House Committee on Foreign Affairs. That is the
Speaker 2: original first attempt at American US foreign policy. And it's
Speaker 2: really founded by John Tyler Morgan, who was a grand
Speaker 2: Master of the KKK. So this is just before the
Speaker 2: turn of the twentieth century.
Speaker 1: Had names, right, it's like a grand Master, the lodge
Speaker 1: grand Master of the KKK. It just not like they
Speaker 1: even changed their titles to right honey, right.
Speaker 2: Well, It's like it's like Louis Brandei's writing the Protocol
Speaker 2: of Peace, and you know, I'm stating publicly that he's
Speaker 2: got to be involved in the in the authoring the
Speaker 2: or the at least the publishing of the Protocols of
Speaker 2: the Elders of Zion, because it happens at the exact
Speaker 2: same time nineteen seventeen or nineteen nineteen when.
Speaker 1: They were Yeah, I think there was. I think it
Speaker 1: was found in a little bit before that, Yes, in
Speaker 1: Russia somewhere like that.
Speaker 2: It gains in its popularity and it enters the public
Speaker 2: lexicon during Brandeis's rise.
Speaker 1: So I think that came out of a French lodge
Speaker 1: of Francis and Jesuits mixed in with the regular frimous
Speaker 1: sound of quorder. So you don't mean to we get
Speaker 1: two separate revolutions out of the French lodge. We get
Speaker 1: the French Revolution and the Wolloshipic Revolution. The plotting and
Speaker 1: the creation of that.
Speaker 8: Right.
Speaker 2: So Jacobins Adornal and Horkheimer work with these two guys,
Speaker 2: Felix Lauserfeldt, he's a Jewish intellectual from the Vienna School,
Speaker 2: and Robert K. Merton born Meyer, Robert Skolnik. So they
Speaker 2: do this famous mass communication. They publish this investigation or
Speaker 2: this book mass Communication, Popular Taste and something or other
Speaker 2: in which they coin these two terms, the two step
Speaker 2: flow of the two step flow of communication theory and
Speaker 2: the hypodermic needle communication model. And this shows you how
Speaker 2: the media works. We're talking about the rise of the
Speaker 2: scientific expert. And here's how the media was created to
Speaker 2: be your influencer and governor through opinion that you can
Speaker 2: see the media, select media then distributes this same information,
Speaker 2: and then it is reiterated by the famous members of
Speaker 2: our population, and then it becomes more believable to the
Speaker 2: general public. And then the hypodermic needle, in which the
Speaker 2: media just directly injects propaganda into the general public. And
Speaker 2: if you want any examples of that, just turn on
Speaker 2: the TV right now, yeah, because within ten seconds you'll
Speaker 2: see it.
Speaker 1: It's nice how the outline all this for us and
Speaker 1: tell us directly what they're gonna do, and yet people
Speaker 1: still don't catch up.
Speaker 2: And Adorno Horkheimer involved in the War of the World's
Speaker 2: broadcast the World's Research Project where they everybody was freaked
Speaker 2: out because they thought aliens were landing in America. These
Speaker 2: guys were at the bottom of it.
Speaker 1: And oddly enough, from Princeton, right.
Speaker 2: It was came from Yeah, because the Association of Universities
Speaker 2: American Universities is another major foundational building block for this
Speaker 2: rise of the expert. We couldn't have they couldn't have
Speaker 2: done it so successfully without the Association of Universities because
Speaker 2: you know, Harvard Law Review and Harvard Business School they
Speaker 2: largely direct narratives. Now, as long as you say, oh,
Speaker 2: Harvard thought it, people have no problem with it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I liked Wells a little bit. I mean, I
Speaker 1: could understand that here is a brilliant mind, but uh yeah.
Speaker 2: His work there there's a world brain where you know,
Speaker 2: he predicts the Internet some seventy years before it happens,
Speaker 2: how you'll be able to sit down in your own
Speaker 2: private room with a with a screen in which you'll
Speaker 2: be able to get information, you know, of all types
Speaker 2: from all around the world.
Speaker 1: You know that Tesla actually talked about a device that
Speaker 1: you could communicate with that would also do the same
Speaker 1: thing a lot of time. He had the idea of
Speaker 1: basically a handheld device like that. So it's kind of
Speaker 1: kind of interesting.
Speaker 2: Well, I would say that when you understand, you know,
Speaker 2: how things work, you're going to be able to predict
Speaker 2: things a lot easier.
Speaker 1: Right, especially when yeah, you know, and the interesting thing
Speaker 1: that makes you think of Reset and prior high technology
Speaker 1: is the quotes by Tesla that said, I didn't discover anything,
Speaker 1: I didn't invent anything. I rediscovered it.
Speaker 14: Right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So here's a key quote from Edward Burnees's Propaganda.
Speaker 2: I offered one last week, the very first paragraph of
Speaker 2: that book. But here's one from page one fifty six
Speaker 2: in relation to the motion picture. So this is the
Speaker 2: father of propaganda talking about the motion picture. The motion
Speaker 2: picture can standardize the ideas and habits of a nation.
Speaker 2: Now that's all I really need to say. You can
Speaker 2: see that the father of propaganda sees the power of
Speaker 2: the television. And not for a second should we, all
Speaker 2: of us living in the year twenty twenty four, still
Speaker 2: think that the television was invented for our entertain thought
Speaker 2: as we could ever have.
Speaker 1: Entertainment is distraction, but yeah, it's it's to cultivate and
Speaker 1: mold your mind. Absolutely, it was for.
Speaker 2: Your entrainment, Yes, entertain gram gramming broadcasting channels. Right, this
Speaker 2: is all you know, one of our spell casting. It's
Speaker 2: speaking to the dead right television m h.
Speaker 1: Occultist who is trying to talk to his dead brother?
Speaker 1: What do you call it? The vacuum tube? I believe
Speaker 1: was or whatever that that the the old TV tube
Speaker 1: or whatever.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Yeah, there was several attempts at the television before
Speaker 2: they found it, there was it was all over the world.
Speaker 2: There was a race for it, much like the iPad
Speaker 2: to the iPhone. So because pictures are made to meet
Speaker 2: market demands, they reflect, emphasize it, and even exaggerate broad
Speaker 2: popular tendencies. Rather than stimulate new ideas and opinions. The
Speaker 2: motion picture availed itself only of ideas and facts which
Speaker 2: are in vogue. As the newspaper seeks to purvey news,
Speaker 2: it the motion picture seeks to purvey entertainment.
Speaker 1: So I just I just caught something. You I think
Speaker 1: you mean pod iPod to the iPhone, not pad, because
Speaker 1: pad is just another bigger screen of a TV.
Speaker 2: Or yeah, iPad to the iPhone.
Speaker 1: Well, pod though, right, pod came first, where yeah, it
Speaker 1: was a little smaller. Well, you listen to music on it,
Speaker 1: and yeah, you could search the internet, but it was
Speaker 1: yet yeah, yeah, and it was before the iPad.
Speaker 2: Right, But they developed the iPad to be able to
Speaker 2: go on the internet and do all kinds of other
Speaker 2: things beyond the iPod.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, the iPod could go online, you just couldn't
Speaker 1: call it it I had, Yeah, And.
Speaker 2: Then as soon as they were able to minimize that
Speaker 2: technology into something you could put in your pocket, right. Well,
Speaker 2: then they put all of their research and development time
Speaker 2: into that. So the conclusion Los Angeles was a crowded
Speaker 2: was as crowded with artists as the Renaissance time. It
Speaker 2: was a sort of harmonic convergence of superstar European intellectuals
Speaker 2: who found themselves in this environment suddenly, not really by
Speaker 2: their choice, but here they were. And it was Sulko
Speaker 2: Vertel that was what you might think of as the
Speaker 2: glue that kept this community together. So she's really close
Speaker 2: friends with Greta Garbo. She befriends her rights all of
Speaker 2: the movies for Greta Garbo.
Speaker 1: So then what happened, We'll check this out and then
Speaker 1: they and then they come up with the problem reaction solution.
Speaker 1: Here I'm reading I'm reading ahead a little bits as
Speaker 1: a public outrage at the corrupted storylines. Well, at least
Speaker 1: we had some some senses of values and virtues back
Speaker 1: then it stops those out though.
Speaker 2: Okay, So the Hayes Code comes along was created as
Speaker 2: an attempt to regulate the content or subject matter of
Speaker 2: Hollywood movies. Named after William Harrison Hayes Senior, the director
Speaker 2: of The Newly I Did motion picture producers and distributors
Speaker 2: of America previously unseen and even unknown concepts like sexual innuendo,
Speaker 2: sexual perversion, romantic and sexual relationships between white and black people,
Speaker 2: miss sigenation.
Speaker 1: Will yeah, it's uh, it's like male Uh it's it's
Speaker 1: kind of like male Schovinism.
Speaker 2: No, yeah, uh, willful offense to any nation, race or creed,
Speaker 2: mild profanity, illegal trafficking of drugs, promiscuity, prostitution, infidelity, abortion,
Speaker 2: intense violence, and homosexuality where rampant and shocking. All of
Speaker 2: these topics have been become normalized today. And this is
Speaker 2: how they first did it.
Speaker 1: And actually they should just run to fly. In the twenties,
Speaker 1: they would have seen all that.
Speaker 2: Right and and and Berne's in right before this was
Speaker 2: doing all of this on Broadway, right with orphan ane
Speaker 2: and movies about syphilis and uh venereal diseases and all
Speaker 2: of these things that weren't being talked about.
Speaker 1: Cheerley Temple used to sing love stories in one of
Speaker 1: the movies to a male, an adult male.
Speaker 2: Right. Yes, there's some real creepy stuff. So special care
Speaker 2: was to be used when broaching subjects like According to
Speaker 2: the Hayes Code. Special care was to be used when
Speaker 2: broaching subjects like international relations, arson, the use of firearms, theft, robbery,
Speaker 2: safe cracking, technique of murder, torture, hangings, sedition, marriage, consummation,
Speaker 2: cruelty to children, deliberate seduction of girls, excessive and lustful kissing,
Speaker 2: and so on. These are all examples that I pulled
Speaker 2: out of there. So this period coinciding precisely because we
Speaker 2: sat here, my wife and I for about two weeks
Speaker 2: and watched as much film noir as one person could,
Speaker 2: and all of the storylines are the same. It's all
Speaker 2: about degenerative plot lines, degeneracy.
Speaker 1: Demoralizing, romanticize this period too, yes, especially the French. The
Speaker 1: French film noir is like, oh my god.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So this period coinciding precisely with the influx of
Speaker 2: German speaking immigrants, but not only that they were generally
Speaker 2: practitioners of these behaviors themselves. Many within the exile circle
Speaker 2: were bisexual. Huxley's wife and even Huxley himself seemed to
Speaker 2: have been willing participants. So in the Haze Code, we've
Speaker 2: offered it here. These are taken from the National Archives.
Speaker 2: I believe we see in the section reasons underlying the
Speaker 2: general principles stated, no picture shall be produced which will
Speaker 2: lower the moral standards of those who see it. Hence,
Speaker 2: the sympathy of the audience should never be thrown to
Speaker 2: the side of crime, wrongdoing, evil, or sin. This is
Speaker 2: done one when evil is made to appear attractive or alluring,
Speaker 2: and good is made to appear unattractive. Two when the
Speaker 2: sympathy of the audience is thrown on the side of crime, wrongdoing, evil,
Speaker 2: or sin. The same thing is true of a film
Speaker 2: that would throw sympathy against goodness, on our innocent purity
Speaker 2: or honesty. We see this today. We all emphasize or
Speaker 2: empathize with gangster movies. We all, in the end cheer
Speaker 2: for the gangster.
Speaker 1: You know, it's funny about this because this actually almost
Speaker 1: had a catalystic effect on the way this was impacting people,
Speaker 1: because even though they weren't able to show it, when
Speaker 1: you insinuate and then you cut and you hear like
Speaker 1: it's like a black screen with gunshots, your mind still
Speaker 1: fills in the blanks. You still understand what's going on,
Speaker 1: and it actually causes you to interact with it more
Speaker 1: because your mind and the blanks, yourself so in a way,
Speaker 1: it's actually better when they don't show it because it's
Speaker 1: not you know what I mean. The gore could be
Speaker 1: repulsive to you, but if you have to think about it,
Speaker 1: then it's more of an impact.
Speaker 2: Yes, and there is one of these producers, specifically, his
Speaker 2: last name starts with an L, and he was known
Speaker 2: for doing the exactly. Let that so if if a
Speaker 2: couple were gonna meet to have sex hotel room, they
Speaker 2: would show the couple meeting and entering the room, but
Speaker 2: all it would show is the door closing and then
Speaker 2: reopening again and that do not disturb sign being put
Speaker 2: on and the door closed again, so you can you
Speaker 2: can imply that they're going to go in and have
Speaker 2: sex right without showing it. This happens even today. You
Speaker 2: see a lot of times, especially in commercials, you'll see
Speaker 2: rarely do people actually drink or eat the product that
Speaker 2: they're selling. It's going to their mouth and just as
Speaker 2: it's going to their mouth, they break away and edit.
Speaker 2: So it is this is a and same with the
Speaker 2: horror genre. This is why often you don't get to
Speaker 2: see the murderer killer until the end, because it's far
Speaker 2: more scarier and personified within each individual, because each of
Speaker 2: us have separate fears.
Speaker 1: Right, and you're filling in the blanks yourself exactly.
Speaker 2: So you mentioned the Weimar and this is where we close.
Speaker 2: Hollywood was always of question moral standards, and today as
Speaker 2: we trace back these less desirable qualities of society, we
Speaker 2: find their origins go directly back to the film noir
Speaker 2: era of the early twentieth century. Hollywood itself was meant
Speaker 2: to degrade Western life from the very beginning, and despite
Speaker 2: all of the efforts to curb degeneracy and depravity from
Speaker 2: entering Hollywood movies, we see this explicit behavior increase with
Speaker 2: the release of movies like The Moon Is Blue, The
Speaker 2: Man with the Golden Arm, The Anatomy of the Murder, Yes,
Speaker 2: Summer of Happiness, Summer with Monica, Suddenly, Last Summer Psycho,
Speaker 2: Some Like It, Hot Victim, A Taste of Honey, and
Speaker 2: the Leather Boys. You see all kinds of degeneracy, just
Speaker 2: even in the titles. And we see today, you know,
Speaker 2: we see in Hollywood there's a movie out now where
Speaker 2: it's two cannibalistic lovers and they're they're driving around America,
Speaker 2: killing and eating people, and it's a love story. So
Speaker 2: We couldn't get much worse than that at this point.
Speaker 2: And you know, I grew up with Friday the Thirteenth
Speaker 2: movies and Halloween and all of these things. But highly generative.
Speaker 2: And you talk about things that influence us even if
Speaker 2: we aren't actually participating in it, but you just visually
Speaker 2: see it and how your brain works, and it actually
Speaker 2: acts a lot like you've just experienced that. Well, how
Speaker 2: many deaths do children see before the age of ten?
Speaker 2: I mean, we could change this world. There is a
Speaker 2: different society that would present itself if we stopped participating
Speaker 2: in all of this darkness.
Speaker 1: Right, if they showed more old noble examples everywhere, then
Speaker 1: that's what it would be imprinted instead of this shit.
Speaker 2: Yes, so all of these movies challenging existing taboos and
Speaker 2: traditional gender roles while confronting homophobia in fidelity and adultery.
Speaker 2: Many of the lead characters in film Noir were homosexuals,
Speaker 2: had addictions, appeared androgynous, or were troubled in some way. Right,
Speaker 2: It's like I was just watching Mister Dress Up, a
Speaker 2: children's show here in Canada that I used to watch
Speaker 2: when I was young, and everything's adrogynous. The little puppets.
Speaker 2: You can't tell if they're boys or girls. I mean
Speaker 2: it just it has infiltrated everything.
Speaker 1: Oh look a look at Sesame Street in this ship
Speaker 1: that they.
Speaker 2: We've been watching lots of Sesame Street. I think this
Speaker 2: is kind of where my research wants to go. So
Speaker 2: many many of the lead characters in fil noir were homosexuals,
Speaker 2: had addictions, appeared to androgynists, were troubled in some way.
Speaker 2: The movies nudged once controversial topics into the acceptable lexicons
Speaker 2: through our empathy for the protagonists. Now that is.
Speaker 1: I think Jim Henson was knocked off because they were
Speaker 1: going to take his kid's creation and move somewhere a
Speaker 1: different direction.
Speaker 2: It's quite possible this is Overton window, right, the moving
Speaker 2: of the Overton window, things that weren't acceptable twenty years
Speaker 2: prior or now in the mainstream. And this is how
Speaker 2: the gay agenda has turned into the transgender agenda, which
Speaker 2: is going to turn into what this book, the Voluptuous
Speaker 2: Panic and the Top has described. And this is where
Speaker 2: we're heading. So it's LGBTQ plus. Well I found out
Speaker 2: what the plus was, and you ain't going to be
Speaker 2: happy about it. So a quick perusal through this book,
Speaker 2: you start to see eyes wide shut, you start to
Speaker 2: see red hot chili peppers. Give it away, Give it away,
Speaker 2: Give it away now, men nearly naked, all painted silver. Okay,
Speaker 2: So I encourage you to look at this. Just Google searchers,
Speaker 2: Internet search Voluptuous Panic archives. Okay. So archive dot org
Speaker 2: has this book, and anything that's unpublished or out of
Speaker 2: print at this point is most likely going to be
Speaker 2: at archive dot org. Yep.
Speaker 1: And then top left sand corna. I just wanted to
Speaker 1: point out those are men, right yep.
Speaker 2: And when you start to peruse this book and you
Speaker 2: get to the end, you're going to see this is
Speaker 2: where America is right now, and this is where we're going,
Speaker 2: and it's it's having sex with animals. What's the term
Speaker 2: that you use. So this is at the end of
Speaker 2: Voluptuous Panic. You start to see them playing with animals.
Speaker 2: And you know in the original Blue Monday song, Okay,
Speaker 2: blue being another key giveaway because they use this word
Speaker 2: blue and a lot. But what is when you go
Speaker 2: back to look at the original video of Blue Monday,
Speaker 2: the very famous song, it has a Winema rainer dog
Speaker 2: and they're filming it in sexual ways and there's a
Speaker 2: free Masonic T shirt that one of the band members
Speaker 2: is wearing, and it gets into all this kind of
Speaker 2: just weirdness. So I offer this because it looks a
Speaker 2: lot like eyes wide shut, you know, and so when
Speaker 2: you see there, you're going to start to see parallels.
Speaker 2: And so, you know, bands like Red Chili Peppers that
Speaker 2: we've thought of as the ultimate and cool, we're actually
Speaker 2: all pushed in this direction. And this is why. Because
Speaker 2: they were so degenerative, they were putting their cocks in
Speaker 2: socks and and really pushing social taboos into the mainstream. So,
Speaker 2: you know, and publishing houses were looking at these guys going,
Speaker 2: this is exactly who we're looking for. This is why
Speaker 2: bands like Motley Crue and Metallica are so huge today.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know there, it's what's ah man. There was
Speaker 1: definitely a big push for bisexuality and making that cool
Speaker 1: with a lot of bands. But you can't really separate
Speaker 1: this group of people, these chosen ones, from sodomy, you can't,
Speaker 1: or pedophilia or child garden. You can't separate it.
Speaker 2: No, no, And that makes a good point that all
Speaker 2: of these glam rock bands of the eighties look like
Speaker 2: women and that's really where ithue looks like a lady
Speaker 2: comes from. Because Steven Tyler was hanging out at a
Speaker 2: bar and Vince Neil had his back turned to him
Speaker 2: and he's like, oh, no, blonde over there. And it
Speaker 2: turned around and and Stephen Tyler said to Joe Perry, oh, dude,
Speaker 2: looks like a lady was talking about it.
Speaker 1: That's that was Vince Neiled.
Speaker 2: That Germany was crushed under the Versailles Treaty. This is
Speaker 2: another aspect of this that we need to get to
Speaker 2: this because really it's a lesson for us how they
Speaker 2: treated Germany as a lesson for how they are treating
Speaker 2: us in the West here today. Really trump being that
Speaker 2: that Hitler figure, the total polarizing figure. So Germany was
Speaker 2: crushed under the Versailles Treaty, and German culture and its
Speaker 2: people quickly fell into chaos due to hyperinflation, starvation, and
Speaker 2: Western occupation. A fifteen year French occupation of German coal
Speaker 2: reserves and a reparation package the equivalent of trillions today
Speaker 2: meant to be impossible to honor was written by the Allies.
Speaker 2: The treaty authored vindictively, most likely through the Dulles brothers
Speaker 2: and that's confirmed now they were authors of the Treaty
Speaker 2: of Versailles, and I've got pictures there yet. So was
Speaker 2: what British economists John Maynard Keynes called a Kurthaginian peace.
Speaker 2: And who's John Maynard Keynes, but the founder of Kingsian economics.
Speaker 2: And really what was established after for the twentieth century
Speaker 2: an agreement meant to cripple ad Bolaccio. So from this
Speaker 2: background sprung the Weimar Republican It is during this time
Speaker 2: Berlin becomes a cesspool of sexual depravity and excess. Brothels
Speaker 2: were everywhere, and prostitutes numbered in the hundreds of thousands.
Speaker 2: And these are prostitutes with one leg, you know, no legs.
Speaker 2: These are you could get, You could fulfill any fetish
Speaker 2: that you had, I would say.
Speaker 1: Of pushing all this during the desperation of people to
Speaker 1: at least just have enough to eat, right that the
Speaker 1: daughters were put in early the little were the mother
Speaker 1: daughter freaking pairs that they would do. And but who
Speaker 1: were the pimps. Let's let's let's let's let's clear that up.
Speaker 1: Who were the actual pimps put you know, and the
Speaker 1: people putting on these plays, you know it wasn't Germans
Speaker 1: by person.
Speaker 2: And actually sulko Vertel and a lot of these guys
Speaker 2: that ended up in Hollywood were a part of a
Speaker 2: traveling entertainment troupe and they were going through Central Europe
Speaker 2: spreading all of this stuff, just like they ended up
Speaker 2: doing through Hollywood Motion Picture.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they create a bunch of chaos.
Speaker 2: And then they fled. This is why they had to flee,
Speaker 2: because they were the ones creating the chaos. These are
Speaker 2: the books that Hitler burned, yep, including HG. Wells, Huxley
Speaker 2: or Well but also all of these people. These are
Speaker 2: the books when you see the big pul of books
Speaker 2: on fire, these are the authors. So it's a profound
Speaker 2: realization when you go, oh wow. So Hitler actually saw
Speaker 2: what a lot of conspiracy theorists see in the West
Speaker 2: today and.
Speaker 1: The balls to do things. You know, he had the
Speaker 1: he had the balls to get rid of the garbage
Speaker 1: without having to go through the bureaucracy of getting it done,
Speaker 1: because that's not the way to do it. You know,
Speaker 1: you got to show your strength.
Speaker 2: And so many people think that it's the other way around.
Speaker 2: It was Hitler that was bringing this debauchery, and it
Speaker 2: was the healthy books that Hitler burned. I had this
Speaker 2: conversation with so many people in the gay community that
Speaker 2: they think that all of that debauchery was actually created
Speaker 2: by Hitler, when it was him rising up to against it.
Speaker 1: And look and look at what look at what they
Speaker 1: did to us in you know, Spielberg's Indiana Jones and
Speaker 1: the last year said when you have when you have
Speaker 1: Sean Conry saying that blah blah blah, people like you
Speaker 1: should start should try reading books instead of burning them.
Speaker 1: Well what the books are we talking about? Though, buddy?
Speaker 1: You know what propaganda was that? And I loving at Jones,
Speaker 1: but looking back, I'm just like he hates Nazis. I
Speaker 1: hate these guys. It's like, come on, man.
Speaker 2: Yeah, In nearly all of Spielberg's movies, there's always an ode.
Speaker 1: To like, they have no other theme. They got to
Speaker 1: keep on playing that one over because if we knew
Speaker 1: the truth, that would break a lot of things open.
Speaker 2: Well, Spielberg is a master of propaganda, isn't he mean
Speaker 2: he wrote Schindler's List.
Speaker 1: Which was an artificial story that people take as historical fact.
Speaker 2: Yes, this is one of the problems in our society,
Speaker 2: is that a lot of people think that when they
Speaker 2: go to see a movie, they're going to understand history better.
Speaker 2: When I was a kid, we all knew better.
Speaker 1: And then you have people like Tarantino when inglorious bastards, abusing,
Speaker 1: abusing national socialists, and at the end like their machine
Speaker 1: gunning the shit out of the face of Hitler because
Speaker 1: it's revusioness history, right.
Speaker 2: That's totally so. The tawdry and salacious theater and plays
Speaker 2: common at the time inspired various nicknames for Berlin, the
Speaker 2: Shangri law by the Spree, the Edge City, and Babylon Berlin.
Speaker 2: We today in the West witnessed so many similarities to
Speaker 2: this era of the Wimert it's hard not to make
Speaker 2: certain connections and wonder if the now even more brutal
Speaker 2: list of horror and neo noir movies being released for
Speaker 2: public consumption aren't just an extension of this movement, further
Speaker 2: ingraining messages of immorality, absurdity, and chaos into the minds
Speaker 2: of America well over one hundred years after it all began,
Speaker 2: And why is it still continuing unabated Because nobody understands
Speaker 2: the rise of the expert. They don't understand the progressive era.
Speaker 2: And that's why I've come on your show on the
Speaker 2: Wednesdays to try to hash all of this out, to
Speaker 2: have people see it more clearly as to how this
Speaker 2: all happened through nice sounding words, through our liberal sentimentality
Speaker 2: we talked about a little earlier. So if we were
Speaker 2: sitting here wondering how the hell we got here, well,
Speaker 2: it certainly isn't because they, you know, openly admitted to
Speaker 2: everything along the way. It's because they kept it hidden
Speaker 2: and spoke to us in nice sounding words. And that's
Speaker 2: pretty much the definition of the progressive era. Are very
Speaker 2: oh sorry ahead, radical social reform done under the auspices
Speaker 2: of nice sounding.
Speaker 1: Words, are very construct Our of our DNA, of our history,
Speaker 1: of our heritage makes us warriors against injustice. So all
Speaker 1: you have to do is present yourself as a victim
Speaker 1: and then you'll get garner our sympathy. Yep, and then
Speaker 1: you can manipulate us.
Speaker 2: Yep. That's cultural Marxism or yeah, it's cultural marxism. Really.
Speaker 2: What they've done right, they've they've removed our culture, the
Speaker 2: traditional culture. We talked about that how movies and storylines
Speaker 2: were originally with wholesome, honest characters and they've flipped it now,
Speaker 2: so what we are kind of sometimes I see people
Speaker 2: holding on the culture that they gave us, right, so
Speaker 2: we have to be careful, and so religion that they
Speaker 2: gave us. Yeah, And so when you look at our
Speaker 2: work in its totality, you see that our culture largely
Speaker 2: comes from the German historical school. This same area of
Speaker 2: Central Europe at the time was you know, Prussia and Germany.
Speaker 1: So yeah, Prussia, Prague, you have what do you call it, Frankfurt.
Speaker 1: On the main these are all like hotdaeds for Berlin.
Speaker 1: Of course, often Bach is kind of like the same
Speaker 1: thing as San Frankfurt's pretty dark close.
Speaker 2: Right, And so you see them all coming from this
Speaker 2: same area landing in you know, the two amplifiers of
Speaker 2: American life, Los Angeles and New York. And they all
Speaker 2: admit that those are both experiments. Even Timothy Leary admits
Speaker 2: on stage during a stand up routine that, you know,
Speaker 2: Los Angeles to them and the CIA back in the
Speaker 2: day was just an experimental laboratory. That's how they looked
Speaker 2: at California in general, but Los Angeles specifically. And when
Speaker 2: we look at the story of brand Eyes and they're
Speaker 2: bringing together of labor and capital. They also use that
Speaker 2: word experimental in the pushing of society because they know
Speaker 2: that if they can accomplish these ideas in New York
Speaker 2: and Los Angeles, you know, the two coolest places, most
Speaker 2: influential in America, they'll be able to have them spread
Speaker 2: then throughout the Midwest. And this is exactly what they did.
Speaker 1: Right, And they always attack the strongholds of revolutionary minds
Speaker 1: of colonialism, you know, the colonists, like you're going after
Speaker 1: New York, You're going after a long history, you know,
Speaker 1: so once you control that, and they I mean, look,
Speaker 1: there's a CFR, there's the United Nations. All this stuff
Speaker 1: doesn't should not be there. It's it's the it's the
Speaker 1: what do you call it, the location of like the
Speaker 1: International Communists, but you could just say communism in America.
Speaker 1: All that is there, UNESCO, all this crap, you know,
Speaker 1: and it's they've taken over a long time ago.
Speaker 2: And yeah, over one hundred years ago. You see a
Speaker 2: lot of people say that Israel was created in nineteen
Speaker 2: forty eight. What we're showing it was created in nineteen seventeen.
Speaker 1: Yeah, talked about her long before that. They were already
Speaker 1: doing it in the late eighteen hundreds, messing with Healesteine
Speaker 1: and Christians.
Speaker 2: Right, we've gone. We go into that in part five
Speaker 2: or six, the Christian dispensationalism and the Social Gospel. This
Speaker 2: is the bringing together of socialism, Christianity, and the progressive
Speaker 2: era in radical social reform. And so you can see
Speaker 2: how all of these different aspects start to combine. And
Speaker 2: they're all paralleling there in their ends, right. So the
Speaker 2: difference may be in their means, but in the end
Speaker 2: they want a great society and industrial democracy or what
Speaker 2: the Social Gospel called it, the Kingdom of Heaven. Right,
Speaker 2: So no matter how you're no matter where you're at,
Speaker 2: they're actually steering you all into the same place. Pied
Speaker 2: Piper of the Yeah, from a parent disparate uh aspects, right,
Speaker 2: the Hollywood are a part in our minds as we thought,
Speaker 2: but they're actually working in kuts.
Speaker 1: And you know, it's so funny, how many times do
Speaker 1: you hear this if it was if that, if this
Speaker 1: was a you know, a world wid conspiracy, as so
Speaker 1: many people would have to be involved. It's like you
Speaker 1: just need the money to be involved, to be the
Speaker 1: controlling aspect and then all other people who are of
Speaker 1: weak mortal fiber will follow step. But you have three
Speaker 1: giant religions with lots and lots of people that you
Speaker 1: can manipulate and convince to do a lot of things
Speaker 1: based on their religious beliefs. After that, plus money, what
Speaker 1: else do you need? You know, and you control the industries,
Speaker 1: you control the media. It's not like it's hard to
Speaker 1: figure out what's going to happen. And the and the
Speaker 1: and the universities and the and the high schools you're creating,
Speaker 1: or people who aren't even aware that there's positioning themselves
Speaker 1: to support their own oppression, no clue whatsoever.
Speaker 2: And if you want a great example of how you
Speaker 2: don't need to influence a whole bunch of people, and
Speaker 2: really it's a small little group. Even one person can
Speaker 2: direct a whole thing. Watch Capricorn one and how they
Speaker 2: they show you how the moonlighting could have been faked
Speaker 2: and maybe only one or two people actually knew what
Speaker 2: was happening. It's just compartmentalization. We live in a highly
Speaker 2: militarized society. You know a lot of us work in cubicles,
Speaker 2: and you know, this is how they prevent it from
Speaker 2: really knowing what the other guy's doing. This is a
Speaker 2: military aspect, right.
Speaker 1: Or just going not like these days you don't even
Speaker 1: talk to your neighbors, you know, in your hot develop
Speaker 1: it's not like it's well small towns or you kind
Speaker 1: of you might be related to most of them, you
Speaker 1: went to high school with them, but once you get
Speaker 1: moved from that area, you go anywhere else and it's
Speaker 1: like and here's the other thing about ethic changes too,
Speaker 1: is that in an area where you aren't familiar with
Speaker 1: their culture, you don't talk to them anyway because you
Speaker 1: don't feel like anything in common with them. So it
Speaker 1: also keeps you separating nicely.
Speaker 2: Did too, Yeah, this is one thing. I've got a
Speaker 2: neighbor at our plot who's a Muslim, their new immigrants,
Speaker 2: and he brings his family and they've got about an
Speaker 2: acre same as well, I got two acres, but we're
Speaker 2: right adjacent, next door neighbors, and only the kids can
Speaker 2: speak English. But uh, we've become friends. Yeah, and bring
Speaker 2: me strawberries and things that they're proud to grow. And
Speaker 2: we're doing it without any language.
Speaker 1: Really that's pretty cool. And yeah, absolutely, yeah, yeah, you're
Speaker 1: that you're in that area too, where you're talking about
Speaker 1: wholesome things farms, you're not talking about the artificial world
Speaker 1: that we that we most of us live in where
Speaker 1: and then you know, yeah, being preoccupied. And then you
Speaker 1: have the digital device aspect, and then you have the
Speaker 1: fact that you know a lot of people are nomadic
Speaker 1: in a sense that you live three four years in
Speaker 1: someplace and they move some worlds, so they get they
Speaker 1: isolate themselves in the process too.
Speaker 2: Right, So I'm going to attempt here before we go
Speaker 2: to bring up some of these famous historical quotes. Now
Speaker 2: it's on a window down at the bottom in my
Speaker 2: tool bar.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, the entire screen one. Then if that's the
Speaker 1: case there it is.
Speaker 2: Okay, So this is from John D. Rock Killer. It's
Speaker 2: coming now, okay, okay, can you see that? Yep, yes,
Speaker 2: So this is from his memoirs, page four O four
Speaker 2: four oh five h David Rockefeller stating some even believe
Speaker 2: we are part of a secret cabal working against the
Speaker 2: best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and
Speaker 2: me as internationalists, and of conspiring with others around the
Speaker 2: world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure,
Speaker 2: one world, if you will. If that's the charge. I
Speaker 2: stand guilty, and I'm proud of it.
Speaker 1: Mm hmm.
Speaker 2: And I'm pretty sure your viewers and listeners and readers
Speaker 2: have seen that or heard that quote. I'm not sure
Speaker 2: if they've actually seen it. This is kind of the
Speaker 2: work that we do. We'll go out and track down
Speaker 2: this stuff.
Speaker 1: Morgan th his his uh little proclamation to to allegedly
Speaker 1: Woodrow Wilson talking about the pledges and how the Federal
Speaker 1: Reserve acted. Is all that stuff was gonna work to
Speaker 1: enslave mankind? Yeah, right, that's that's that's quite the quite
Speaker 1: a little monologue he gave.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And Morgan Morgenthal key guy. Mm hm. So here's
Speaker 2: another one.
Speaker 8: This is.
Speaker 2: A Warburg under congressional testimony stating I think the essential
Speaker 2: thing we should undertake is that we declare our willingness
Speaker 2: to participate in some sort of world organization capable of enacting, administrating, interpreting,
Speaker 2: and enforcing world law. Whether you call it a federation
Speaker 2: of government or a world order.
Speaker 1: I don't think that matters whether you call it no
Speaker 1: hide laws, whether you call it right.
Speaker 2: Okay, And then there's a follow up quote to that.
Speaker 2: Let's see if I can grab it in which this
Speaker 2: is the famous one, give me one second. The one
Speaker 2: that everybody talks about but nobody actually ever shows, is
Speaker 2: his statement and Congressional record in which he states, we
Speaker 2: will have a one world government.
Speaker 1: Whether you like it, like it or not. Yep, that's
Speaker 1: like the kind Wiseman one. This is we shall have Palestine,
Speaker 1: whether you wish it or not.
Speaker 2: And Woodrow Wilson agreeable if necessary, agreeable if they have to,
Speaker 2: the imposition of this League of Nations and the creation
Speaker 2: of the United Nations in the one world, or so
Speaker 2: we shall have world government, whether or not we like it.
Speaker 2: The question is only whether world government will be achieved
Speaker 2: by consent or by conquest. So that's where we are today.
Speaker 2: We're right at the door is closing, and we're trying
Speaker 2: to encourage people, educate people as to what's going on.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the tech this time around is going to be
Speaker 1: overwhelming for us to try. If we are already subdued
Speaker 1: that it, it's gonna be really fun.
Speaker 2: It's almost like they're waiting for some technology to advance
Speaker 2: to the point where they can carry out something like
Speaker 2: a fake alien landing.
Speaker 1: And they've been slowly setting up the kill grid system
Speaker 1: and changing the lights in the streets and all this
Speaker 1: other stuff that's messed with your brain. Just gonna mess
Speaker 1: with the people who got shots. It's gonna mess with
Speaker 1: nor people with the electromatic radiation and how that affects
Speaker 1: your mood and your health. Just that alone, but then
Speaker 1: everything else that they poison, you know, and then also
Speaker 1: the propaganda, and it's just going to keep people right
Speaker 1: where they want them.
Speaker 2: Yeah. One of the interesting things too, is the LED
Speaker 2: light was created by Monsanto.
Speaker 1: Really, it's the were the free range, free range chickens.
Speaker 1: Were the free range animals looking like we were somehow
Speaker 1: able to be mobile and go do things that we
Speaker 1: want to do. But we're just free range chickens. Yeah,
Speaker 1: about to get cooked.
Speaker 2: So nineteen seventeen, Oscar Callaway. This is another famous quote
Speaker 2: that shows the overthrow of media, even before television. This
Speaker 2: is where mister Calloway states, mister Chairman, under anonymous consent,
Speaker 2: I insert into the record at this point a statement
Speaker 2: showing the newspaper combination which explains their activity in this
Speaker 2: war matter just discussed by the gentlemen from Pennsylvania. In
Speaker 2: March nineteen fifteen, the JP Morgan interests the steel shipbuilding
Speaker 2: and powder interests. So that's DuPont, that's Carnegie and Bernard Baruch,
Speaker 2: and the War Industries Board is about to be created here,
Speaker 2: and powder interests and their subsidiary organizations got together twelve
Speaker 2: men high up in the newspaper world and employed them
Speaker 2: to select the most influential newspapers in the United States
Speaker 2: and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy
Speaker 2: of the daily press of the United States. These twelve
Speaker 2: men worked the problem out by selecting one hundred and
Speaker 2: seventy nine newspapers and then began by an elimination process
Speaker 2: to retain policy of the daily press throughout the country.
Speaker 2: They found it was only necessary to purchase the control
Speaker 2: of twenty five of the greatest papers. The twenty five
Speaker 2: papers were agreed upon, emissaries were sent to purchase the policy,
Speaker 2: national and international of those papers. An agreement was reached.
Speaker 2: The policy of the papers was bought, to be paid
Speaker 2: for by the month. An editor was furnished for each
Speaker 2: paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions
Speaker 2: of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national
Speaker 2: and international nature considered vital to the interest of the purchasers.
Speaker 2: So that is showing that JP Morgan completely overthrew the newspapers.
Speaker 2: Nothing in the newspapers since nineteen fifteen should be ever believed.
Speaker 1: It makes me wonder if William Randolph Hurst was a
Speaker 1: played ball or he didn't because he was.
Speaker 2: I think all of those names did.
Speaker 1: They Sorry, they look at him kind of disparagingly in
Speaker 1: history and they did that whole little hit piece on
Speaker 1: him using whereson Wells. So it makes me wonder if
Speaker 1: there was a little resistance there. I don't know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I would say that all those guys were playing
Speaker 2: a role. Hurst. I think he was most likely playing
Speaker 2: a role to sort of prop up the image of
Speaker 2: the fourth Estate that somebody must be out there looking
Speaker 2: after us. I think, yeah, it's us.
Speaker 1: We don't do anything.
Speaker 2: And this is one of the quotes that I didn't
Speaker 2: get to with Carrie Mollis. Is this he realized this
Speaker 2: when he was first initially thrown into his expertise, was
Speaker 2: that there was actually nobody at the wheel, right, Okay.
Speaker 1: So there's noude Mommy or daddy making sure you're being honest.
Speaker 2: Yep. So one last share here, and this is from
Speaker 2: William Tory Harris. This is one of the education reformers.
Speaker 2: He's actually the one most responsible for opening up the Midwest,
Speaker 2: starting in Saint Louis, and he stayed here. In philosophy
Speaker 2: of education, ninety nine out of one hundred people in
Speaker 2: every civilized nation are automatic, careful to walk in the
Speaker 2: prescribed paths, careful to follow prescribed customs. This is the
Speaker 2: result of substantial education, which scientifically defined is the subsumption
Speaker 2: of the individual under a species.
Speaker 1: Okay, I've got one, I got one.
Speaker 2: I'll give you with that.
Speaker 1: So this is perfectly in line with that. I don't
Speaker 1: know if I've heard this while you're on or someone else,
Speaker 1: but almost all the people of all eras are hypnotics.
Speaker 1: Their belief their beliefs are induced beliefs. The proper authorities
Speaker 1: saw to it that the proper beliefs should be induced
Speaker 1: and the people believed properly. Charles hoy For eighteen seventy
Speaker 1: four to nineteen thirty two.
Speaker 2: Right, that's beautiful. And so the New Age movement was
Speaker 2: created by hypnotists. Yep.
Speaker 1: And when you go and look at organs of a
Speaker 1: New Age, there you go, we're all being hypnotized.
Speaker 2: Some of us can break the hypnotism and some of
Speaker 2: us can't.
Speaker 1: And by the way, everybody get this. Okay, I'm reading.
Speaker 2: I'm reading it right now. I'm using it as source material.
Speaker 1: Nice.
Speaker 2: Thanks, awesome, Yeah, great job.
Speaker 1: There you got my book. Now there's a testimonial. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that'd be great. I'll support it, I'll promote it.
Speaker 2: Yeah. All right, man, Well that's what all I got
Speaker 2: for today.
Speaker 1: Oh somebody said, you guys are a wealth of knowledge.
Speaker 1: It's always lightning catching these dreams. Dwayne reads into the
Speaker 1: and explains everything. So well, stay at it, boys, you're
Speaker 1: killing it. Thank you, Archangel.
Speaker 2: We're trying to be that exact thing, trying to be
Speaker 2: concise but give you the goods that you really need
Speaker 2: to know. So I encourage you to go to Bulletproof
Speaker 2: pub dot com to immerse yourself in this Rise of
Speaker 2: the Expert series. This is going to show you exactly
Speaker 2: how this world became the way it is through the
Speaker 2: twentieth century. And Daniel's research is starting to now offer
Speaker 2: a further look back into history. And this is really
Speaker 2: what we wanted to do, is to connect this to
Speaker 2: the over this ominous continuity that seems to go through history.
Speaker 2: I want to connect it to the modern day, so
Speaker 2: we can identify those, you know, in our times at
Speaker 2: least contemporaries of ours, even though they lived one hundred
Speaker 2: years ago. In the grand scheme, I call them contemporaries,
Speaker 2: so that we can finally point the finger at the
Speaker 2: problems and you know, hopefully soil the reputation of some
Speaker 2: of these people so that they're not just consistently and
Speaker 2: constantly honored. And because this is the major problem, we're
Speaker 2: holding these people in high regard and we should not be.
Speaker 1: And that's the thing, too, is the we have to
Speaker 1: put the doubt that should be there in people's minds,
Speaker 1: because that's the problem is this. It's this automatic reflex
Speaker 1: trust in authority or somebody who poses as authority or
Speaker 1: as an expert. And that's what kills us every time.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and you can see that play playing out under
Speaker 2: brandeis because his great grandson, David brandeis rass and Bush
Speaker 2: is the leader of Interfaith Alliance in America. And I
Speaker 2: think that might be even an international I think it is.
Speaker 2: When you look at the logo of it, it's got
Speaker 2: a whole bunch of international flags around it. Inter Faith
Speaker 2: Alliance and This is really one of the ideas started
Speaker 2: by brandeis over one hundred years ago. And so you
Speaker 2: see his great grandson David brandised Rassi and Bush the
Speaker 2: head of Interfaith Alliance today. So that's you know, this
Speaker 2: is this is really why we're trying to break this
Speaker 2: stuff out into the into the lectic and the understanding
Speaker 2: of the general public, because this is everything to us.
Speaker 1: That's crazy that it's the same the same people, the
Speaker 1: same families are still right there. He changed the.
Speaker 2: Spelling of his last name because it was r A
Speaker 2: U s c h e n b U s h
Speaker 2: so a real authentic European name. Well he took the
Speaker 2: two c's out so it's it's more americanized. So you
Speaker 2: can see it's still the same thing. And going on,
Speaker 2: he's his his background a little bit by changing his.
Speaker 1: Name Humble painter. When we were talking about the cubicle,
Speaker 1: when you brought the cubicles, he says, I have my
Speaker 1: red swing line stapler for working in my cubicle, just
Speaker 1: say the office space with.
Speaker 2: Well look at Neo too, right, he's working in a
Speaker 2: in the movie matrix whereas he but he's working in
Speaker 2: a compartment.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, that that's a theme in uh you know,
Speaker 1: what do you call it too?
Speaker 6: Uh?
Speaker 1: Fight club? He says, have you guys covered the book
Speaker 1: the Wanting Seed? I don't know, maybe that's something you
Speaker 1: want to.
Speaker 2: I've never heard of it, but I'll write it down
Speaker 2: and I'll look into it. Yeah, thanks for that. Yep,
Speaker 2: then think about it.
Speaker 1: It sounds like I says forced gay, so maybe it's
Speaker 1: a gender gender propaganda.
Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, okay, cool, I'll look into it. Thank you
Speaker 2: all ready.
Speaker 1: Anything else you'd like to say, sir, I've had a
Speaker 1: good time with you today. Thank you for showing up.
Speaker 2: Yeah, no, it's been great. I really appreciated these Wednesdays.
Speaker 2: And we're just going to keep going. Next week. I
Speaker 2: think I want to get deeper into that hollywoodsm movie,
Speaker 2: So yeah, maybe some homework for everybody. Go watch that
Speaker 2: and we can go through it next week. And uh,
Speaker 2: what I'm doing is bringing stuff that I find during
Speaker 2: the week. So from here till next Wednesday, a week
Speaker 2: from now, there's information always brought to me. And so
Speaker 2: the more that we we find that emphasizes this idea
Speaker 2: of the rise of the expert in our modern times,
Speaker 2: I think that that's Uh, we'll bring some of that
Speaker 2: in next week too, but I want to definitely get
Speaker 2: more of that hollywood ism understood.
Speaker 1: You think you make it too, because you're like you're
Speaker 1: working farming all day long. We you and I because
Speaker 1: I I do want a daily We depend on our
Speaker 1: you know, people out there, Like in my telegram group,
Speaker 1: people email me people that are watching the show to
Speaker 1: show us and me things so that I can look
Speaker 1: them over and help me, you know, come up with
Speaker 1: the next thing that we need to address, because otherwise,
Speaker 1: I'm a dad, I'm a small business owner, I'm you know,
Speaker 1: doing all kinds of other stuff, so I'm going to
Speaker 1: miss stuff, you know, So.
Speaker 2: Well, that's where we all become, you know, a community
Speaker 2: of truth tellers, and we need people that are interested
Speaker 2: in actual forensic investigation doing it properly, like Carrie Mollis stated,
Speaker 2: you know, we've got to do this in a deductive, proper,
Speaker 2: responsible way and not succumb to the perversion of authority
Speaker 2: and not create something that's false just to make ourselves
Speaker 2: look good. So we're trying to be that honest in
Speaker 2: a actually honest investigation into our history to identify the
Speaker 2: real sources of our problems and then hopefully we can
Speaker 2: either remove them or alter them back to the state
Speaker 2: that they were originally meant to be in.
Speaker 1: And it's what's funny is a long time ago at
Speaker 1: one of my descriptions for like, you know, what is
Speaker 1: your show about? And I wrote in their historical forensics
Speaker 1: and you're called in your forensics history, And so it's
Speaker 1: pretty funny that we now are talking together. It's working
Speaker 1: out well.
Speaker 2: There's been much serendipity since you and I hooked up,
Speaker 2: a lot of that also brought on by Nicodemus, absolutely,
Speaker 2: and so it doesn't seem to matter what goes on
Speaker 2: in the week leading up to our Wednesday shows. We're
Speaker 2: on the same page when we get here, So that
Speaker 2: that actually is that states a lot, right, it does
Speaker 2: for me in me dealing with so many people and
Speaker 2: talking to so many people, that that stands out to
Speaker 2: me when those kinds of things has happened, because it
Speaker 2: means that we're probably operating on very similar frequencies and
Speaker 2: we're very similar in our approaches to life and our
Speaker 2: ideologies and those things that are important to us. Right, Yes,
Speaker 2: that would make sense to me that that's why we're
Speaker 2: resonating the way that we are. So we're going to
Speaker 2: continue to ride that way of not think too much
Speaker 2: about it, but continue to break down this Rise of
Speaker 2: the Expert series here and see what we can come
Speaker 2: up with, because I'm about two months away from being
Speaker 2: full time forensic historian again, and then once that happens,
Speaker 2: it's it's game on again. We're going to see what
Speaker 2: we can find and put out as much as we can,
Speaker 2: like we did last year. We were fairly prolific last year,
Speaker 2: and that we were able to put out this ten
Speaker 2: part series on brandis but it was because I had
Speaker 2: a schedule Andy Ross at the Deep Share, and I
Speaker 2: did a ten week series in which we stuck to it.
Speaker 2: We were disciplined and you know, I had to get
Speaker 2: an article out every week, and so it kept me disciplined.
Speaker 2: And it's one of the more enjoyable times of my life,
Speaker 2: to be honest, and so I just I'm looking forward
Speaker 2: to evolving the relationship that I'm having with you here
Speaker 2: and getting to deeper, more important subjects. And you never
Speaker 2: know what clicks with people. You can say something the
Speaker 2: thousandth time and somebody might go, oh, I get it now,
Speaker 2: and it sends them off onto a whole new realm
Speaker 2: of understanding and knowledge of our world. So this is
Speaker 2: why I just repeating the same things. I'm like, I'm
Speaker 2: kind of like Dave McGowan, except I got more than
Speaker 2: just the Laurel Canyon. You know, the House of Truth
Speaker 2: and the Progressive Era, the Future Perfect Series, the creation
Speaker 2: of the League of Nations, but also you know this
Speaker 2: Rise of the Expert because we went to start to
Speaker 2: ask why is our society so governed by the opinion
Speaker 2: of people we've never met. Well, we got to the
Speaker 2: bottom of it and found the makers of our modern
Speaker 2: day social contract, the literal matrix. So I encourage everybody
Speaker 2: once again pulletproofbub dot com.
Speaker 1: And if you can find the series that I did
Speaker 1: a re do of it with the commentary, but you
Speaker 1: might really get into it's called in Purson of Truth
Speaker 1: or it's IPOT seventeen seventy six on what do you
Speaker 1: call it? Bit shoot? I think it survived on But
Speaker 1: if you can find the pop series, I don't even
Speaker 1: know what it stands for. And this as you no,
Speaker 1: this is I did a redo of it, like I
Speaker 1: played out of my show and then the commentary. But
Speaker 1: you can find the Originals. Part two gets really into
Speaker 1: the Berlin stuff and talks about the players and the
Speaker 1: propagandists and the real big push there. I think that'll
Speaker 1: be There's other names in there that we haven't discussed
Speaker 1: yet that I think we'll fill in the Yeah.
Speaker 2: There's many, like the German Alfred Kinsey's there.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's kind of it's kind of like the warm
Speaker 1: up I had because I watched that and then I
Speaker 1: saw Europe at All and they're they're they're very close
Speaker 1: in the same type of information, so so much so
Speaker 1: that I actually paired them together in a couple of
Speaker 1: videos too, or of a showing pieces of the iPod
Speaker 1: and then you know.
Speaker 2: Yep, yeah, cool, all right, man, okaydy, we'll stay in contact.
Speaker 2: We'll see you.
Speaker 1: Thank you everybody, Thank you. You got it, guys. And
Speaker 1: on this topic, on this note, I just need to
Speaker 1: share with you guys real quick, just just to remind
Speaker 1: you how you can support this show, and that is
Speaker 1: simply by going to the description of this video, or
Speaker 1: if you're on any of the other platforms, click the
Speaker 1: show more money Tree Publishing for the for the stuff
Speaker 1: right here. All right, So these are the books and
Speaker 1: the DVDs. I'm back out real quick, and the landing
Speaker 1: page for everything else we do. By the way, doctor
Speaker 1: Peter Glinnen's health recovery site that coupon worked as of
Speaker 1: this morning. Somebody else just signed up, so I'm not
Speaker 1: sure if he's letting it go longer if you just
Speaker 1: forgot to turn it off, but take advantage of it now,
Speaker 1: all right. That's that's his his site. And then for
Speaker 1: everything else, you can hit su seer frellc dot com
Speaker 1: and then you'll get doctor you can go to doctor
Speaker 1: glidd in sight directly from that picture. You got doctor
Speaker 1: Monso's book there, doctor Monzo's supplements, and then everything that
Speaker 1: I do all the way down, all right, right, all right,
Speaker 1: and that's it. Now we will say goodbye for six days.
Speaker 1: Take care man, have a good one.
Speaker 2: Yeah. YouTube seem