Speaker 1: Oh well, thats are hello and welcome to the show.
Speaker 1: This is the Cult of Conspiracy. And my name's Jonathan,
Speaker 1: I'm Jacob, and today we're getting into zombies, Jacob zombies.
Speaker 2: Brother. So all right here we are. We just finished
Speaker 2: an election, you know what I mean. There's a lot
Speaker 2: of things going on. People have been talking about the
Speaker 2: monkey pox and and COVID was this pandemic and oh
Speaker 2: you know, the election just happened, So get ready, there's
Speaker 2: gonna be some wild ship pop off blah blah and blah. Right,
Speaker 2: whether that is or is not a true statement, beside
Speaker 2: the point, it got me thinking. You got me, You
Speaker 2: got the brain turning, and you know how I do
Speaker 2: when I go down my eighty d little tangents, right,
Speaker 2: And I started thinking, as we hear more about these
Speaker 2: pandemics and plandemics and new viruses. We have talked about
Speaker 2: the zombie virus a few times, you know, in varying
Speaker 2: degrees and with varying levels of seriousness, if we're going
Speaker 2: to be honest. But I heard once upon a time,
Speaker 2: and I think we even talked about on a show, Jonathan,
Speaker 2: have you ever heard of con plan eighty eight? Eighty eight?
Speaker 1: If I have. It was a long time ago.
Speaker 2: Okay, con plan. Now, there's two things on it. Either
Speaker 2: it's Contingency Plan eighty eight eighty eight or concept Plan
Speaker 2: eighty eight eighty eight.
Speaker 1: Now I remember, sure, yeah, now I remember that. I
Speaker 1: don't remember what it was about, but it was a
Speaker 1: long time ago. We may have briefly touched upon it.
Speaker 2: Excellent, excellent, Okay. So, and you know what, the fact
Speaker 2: that this plan exists kind of gives me a warm
Speaker 2: and fuzzy feeling on the inside. Reason being our government,
Speaker 2: and you know, I'm not exactly the biggest supporter of
Speaker 2: our government, right, I mean, sometimes they're good. Most of
Speaker 2: the times they're shit, and they're trying to kill us all. Like,
Speaker 2: I get it, I get it. But the fact that
Speaker 2: our Department of Defense and the fact that our administration
Speaker 2: has thought so far into the future, so far in
Speaker 2: advance that if any type of zombie apocalypse outbreak happens,
Speaker 2: they have a plan to take over and make it
Speaker 2: a series and secure human.
Speaker 1: Life, that's right, Yeah, yeah, okay.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So I'm gonna go ahead and share the screen
Speaker 2: at this time as a matter of fact, And Jonathan,
Speaker 2: if you would like to tell these good people where
Speaker 2: they can see this rather than just hear it. Tell
Speaker 2: them where they can go.
Speaker 1: You can come check us out at payground dot com
Speaker 1: slash Cultive can sspiracypodcast or rockfund dot com slash culture
Speaker 1: Conspiracy that link. Both of those links are down in
Speaker 1: the show notes below. Every single Tuesday night we go
Speaker 1: live at nine pm CenTra. You will have access to
Speaker 1: that if you sign up for our Third Eye All
Speaker 1: the Way Open tier. Also, you'll have access to getting
Speaker 1: the shows a couple of days in advance and completely
Speaker 1: commercial free podcast and in the video. The video is
Speaker 1: some people would rather watch the show that way, you'd
Speaker 1: be able to see all the articles and all the
Speaker 1: videos that we're showing. If you're more of a visual
Speaker 1: kind of person, then Patreon is the place to go.
Speaker 1: And we appreciate all of those who have already done
Speaker 1: it because it does support us in the best way
Speaker 1: that you possibly can.
Speaker 2: Don't get me wrong, man, I like listening to audio
Speaker 2: stuff while I'm doing my thing during the day. But
Speaker 2: if I have my option, I'm watching the show. Like
Speaker 2: I could just sit there and listen to Rogan whenever
Speaker 2: he has Donald Trump on, I'd rather watch it. That's
Speaker 2: just a me thing. I'm that level of add I'm
Speaker 2: a visual person. So again, if you're more of a
Speaker 2: visual person, come check us out on Patreon. You will
Speaker 2: get to see the videos a day or two or
Speaker 2: how literally, as soon as they're edited. They're posting on Patreon. Okay,
Speaker 2: not to mention commercial free, y'all. We cannot stress that enough.
Speaker 2: We get it. It's annoying as hell. Patreon is also
Speaker 2: the best way to support the show. Come check us out.
Speaker 1: There, Yes, sir, so Jacob, what are we getting into here? Sir?
Speaker 2: All right, let's go ahead, And there's a quick little
Speaker 2: YouTube short about this con plan eighty eight eighty eight.
Speaker 2: This is the actual US military plan. And if anybody
Speaker 2: who's curious that this actually exists, like, okay, sure, this
Speaker 2: is just a couple of dumb privates that got together
Speaker 2: and through a plan. Not so much. This is actually
Speaker 2: very in depth and because of a freedom of information
Speaker 2: request a few years ago, it had to be released
Speaker 2: in PDF. Guess who has the PDF? Do you have?
Speaker 2: We're gonna be talking. We're gonna be talking about it.
Speaker 2: We're gonna read it, all of it. Let's go.
Speaker 3: The US military actually has a plan for a zombie apocalypse,
Speaker 3: and this is it as part of the military's role
Speaker 3: to plan for every possible contingency, including the undead rising
Speaker 3: from their graves. This is Contingency Plan eight eight eight eight.
Speaker 3: It was devised as a way to help new war
Speaker 3: planners hone their skills, using the ludicrous example of zombies
Speaker 3: as a template, but the plan is both credible and
Speaker 3: fully functional. The plan accounts for everything from pathoogenic viral
Speaker 3: zombies to evil magic zombies and has a six stage response.
Speaker 3: This includes a planning stage, a deterrent stage, a seize
Speaker 3: the initiative stage, a dominant stage, a stabilization stage, and
Speaker 3: finally a normalization stage. The plan is hefty and comprehensive,
Speaker 3: considering everything from vectors of infection to a return to
Speaker 3: normal life afterwards. So it's ready to use at a
Speaker 3: moment's notice. Let's just hope they never need to use it.
Speaker 1: Okay, basically said basically I am Legend.
Speaker 2: One version of it. But if you look at the
Speaker 2: actual story of I Am Legend that was actually supposed
Speaker 2: to be more of a vampire than a zombie antagonist,
Speaker 2: the movie made it out to be more of that.
Speaker 2: It was weird.
Speaker 1: Okay, I didn't know that.
Speaker 2: So right now, let's go ahead and and you know what, actually,
Speaker 2: before we even get to that, let's go ahead and
Speaker 2: read a little bit about this contingency plan, because bro
Speaker 2: I didn't realize this was real life. This is one
Speaker 2: hundred percent real life. This is a sixteen page PDF
Speaker 2: where they break down every single bit of what to
Speaker 2: do in case of a zombie outbreak, whether it be
Speaker 2: from magical experimentation or a virus that spreads throughout the masses.
Speaker 2: This is, in fact the plan. What are you thinking
Speaker 2: right now.
Speaker 1: Bro I, I want to say, I'm not surprised that
Speaker 1: the government came up with one of these plans, knowing
Speaker 1: the messing around with all the different vaccines, the pay
Speaker 1: for play kind of shit that's going on over in Ukraine.
Speaker 1: And also it's like, you know, people think that that
Speaker 1: was Ukraine or other countries that were coming up with,
Speaker 1: you know, these various types of vaccines and what not.
Speaker 1: It's really not Ukraine. Yeah, they might be the ones
Speaker 1: that are hosting set events and set operations and stuff
Speaker 1: like that, but it's really us because over in Ukraine
Speaker 1: there are far less laws and limitations, and so our
Speaker 1: scientists and our you know, billionaire philanthropists aka Bill Gates
Speaker 1: and people like that. They go over to these other
Speaker 1: countries to start manipulating certain genes to see like, well,
Speaker 1: if this was to get out, how would it be
Speaker 1: the most effective to kill the most amount of people
Speaker 1: and that way. And they love looking at that stuff
Speaker 1: for a multitude of reasons. Number one, they want to
Speaker 1: try and see how much money they can make off
Speaker 1: of vaccines. Now we all know that going through twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: they made billions, hundreds of billions of dollars. Yeah, like
Speaker 1: and it was kind of like a trickle down event,
Speaker 1: like people stayed at home, some more people were buying
Speaker 1: from Amazon. People were scared to go outside with a
Speaker 1: mask on the mass companies, people were scared to go
Speaker 1: to certain events, so they wanted to get vaccinated. And
Speaker 1: it's like an all around like pyramid kind of domino
Speaker 1: effect going on there. And so those people they they
Speaker 1: they made money off of the cure. Right. It's the
Speaker 1: it's the Hegelian dialect. Basically, the problem reaction solution. They
Speaker 1: had the solution all along. That's where they start. That's
Speaker 1: step one. What is the solution? Before we you know,
Speaker 1: incite said problem so that's that's that's one way of
Speaker 1: looking at it. Another way of looking at these vaccines
Speaker 1: and everything else, well, how could we make them as
Speaker 1: dangerous as possible if we're trying to wipe out certain
Speaker 1: parts of the human population?
Speaker 3: I e.
Speaker 1: Bill Gates over in uh what was the country that
Speaker 1: he basically sterilized everybody?
Speaker 2: There was a couple of them that we hear about.
Speaker 2: India was one. There was a couple of African countries
Speaker 2: where he had apparently done some ebola vaccine work that
Speaker 2: just iced an entire village. I mean, it really depends
Speaker 2: on the source and what you're talking about. But I
Speaker 2: think there's some credence of truth behind all of it.
Speaker 1: Right and I think that you know, it works at
Speaker 1: a multitude of reasons or multitude ways, and so whether
Speaker 1: they want to make the money off the cure or
Speaker 1: if they want to decrease the human population, but also
Speaker 1: what happens if one of their vaccines goes awry and
Speaker 1: it doesn't work out to the plan that they had.
Speaker 2: I E.
Speaker 1: Zombie outbreak.
Speaker 2: I mean, that's one type of outbreak right then, that
Speaker 2: was the whole thing behind this conplan eight eight eight eight, Okay,
Speaker 2: there's even a disclaimer on the front page of this
Speaker 2: I'm gonna go ahead and read this and give the
Speaker 2: little backstory that is the official narrative right disclaimer, and
Speaker 2: there's in big red words. It's in a whole box
Speaker 2: before you even go to the index or the table
Speaker 2: of contents. Straight up off the top. There's even a
Speaker 2: three D image of a zombie from a video game
Speaker 2: on it to show how quote unquote silly and fake
Speaker 2: this is right disclaimer. This fictitious plan was created by
Speaker 2: junior military officers undergoing training related to the Department of
Speaker 2: Defenses Joint Operations Planning an Execution System or JOPEZ jopp
Speaker 2: us jops jokes I don't fucking know jokes, the formalized
Speaker 2: process by which the Department conducts all contingency planning and execution.
Speaker 2: In an effort to learn the jokes process and to
Speaker 2: do so in a more interesting way, the students were
Speaker 2: assigned this completely fictitious scenario and directed to use jokes
Speaker 2: to develop a written contingency plan. Using the fictitious scenario
Speaker 2: avoided certain excuse me avoided concerns over the use of
Speaker 2: classified information. It resolves sensitivity to the using real world
Speaker 2: nations or scenarios and it better engaged the students. Okay.
Speaker 2: So backstory here, we're at the American War College right
Speaker 2: outside of Washington, DC. Okay, And it's not like a
Speaker 2: college where twenty something year olds go and have like
Speaker 2: frats and they party and they have English one oh one.
Speaker 2: The War College is a place where only a certain
Speaker 2: rank of our mili military can go and do studies
Speaker 2: there to learn how to do warfighting at the macro
Speaker 2: scale more efficiently and better. Okay, it's a great institution.
Speaker 2: So the story goes that at the War College or
Speaker 2: at some other installation where it's like that a military
Speaker 2: training house, a schoolhouse, they are letting these young up
Speaker 2: and coming officers brainstorm about just any and all contingencies. Right.
Speaker 2: Apparently allegedly killer bees were also brought in, Alien invasion
Speaker 2: was brought in, just random things, and apparently they're just
Speaker 2: letting these guys add brain how they would handle it
Speaker 2: if it really played out that way. And that sounds
Speaker 2: all fine and good, But if that was the case,
Speaker 2: this wouldn't be an official DoD document that is written
Speaker 2: and understood to be the current plan of action in
Speaker 2: case this happened. If it was a training exercise, it
Speaker 2: would have been listed as a training exercise. This disclaimer
Speaker 2: is not that listing. This is just a disclaimer, you know.
Speaker 1: And I wanted to throw out there too, And I
Speaker 1: feel like we've probably this before, but you know, I
Speaker 1: feel like if it happens in nature, you know, a
Speaker 1: zombie outbreak, dare I say, or some kind of zombification,
Speaker 1: if it happens in nature, then it has the opportunity
Speaker 1: and the possibility of happening to humanity. And look no
Speaker 1: further than the the the fucking fungus that gets up
Speaker 1: inside of grasshoppers and whatnot, where they basically they'll take
Speaker 1: the grasshopper, they'll they'll basically plunge it into the water
Speaker 1: so that it dies, and then the fungus takes over
Speaker 1: that grasshopper's body and now it's walking around animated as
Speaker 1: if the fungus is the grasshopper. And so if they
Speaker 1: can find a way, the pharmaceutical community, I'm sure they've
Speaker 1: already figured this out, Like there's no way they haven't.
Speaker 1: All the different testing, and you know, we don't know
Speaker 1: what they do with a lot of these bodies. Dude,
Speaker 1: Let's just be real, like you know. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I just try once.
Speaker 2: No, No, what's it called the ones that are the
Speaker 2: fungus that gets inside the brain, not cordyceps.
Speaker 1: It is a kind of mushroom though I believe, well
Speaker 1: it's a fungus.
Speaker 2: But yeah, I just heard somebody who was putting that.
Speaker 2: Oh Stephen Sigall, he was putting that in his energy
Speaker 2: drink that he came out with a while back. He
Speaker 2: was euasitic mushroom brain things. He just threw it in
Speaker 2: there because he's like, yeah, mushrooms, everybody's on that vibe
Speaker 2: right now. It'll be good. Dude. It's the type that, like,
Speaker 2: is the brain eating type.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't want that in me. I don't know
Speaker 1: why the fuck he was drinking.
Speaker 2: That, because Stephen Sagall is one of the biggest fucking
Speaker 2: he's retarded, let's be honest. Like I just watched a
Speaker 2: little backstory about him. His a kedo shit, his cop shit.
Speaker 2: He's basically made his own legend up in his head
Speaker 2: and then just told enough people to where he got
Speaker 2: these movie rolls and like he manifested his own legend.
Speaker 2: But there's like nothing behind it except just his own him.
Speaker 1: Oh so it can happen through a fungus, but it
Speaker 1: can also happen through what is called a horsehair worm
Speaker 1: larva that it transforms into a worm and then it
Speaker 1: takes control of a cricket or a grasshopper, also known
Speaker 1: as the zombie cricket.
Speaker 2: Okay, so we already have some sort of a nature
Speaker 2: precedence for this, and they covered every possible option here.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, let's just go ahead and
Speaker 2: read the table of contents here. They got to disclaimer
Speaker 2: up top, letter of transmittle the security instructions plan excuse me,
Speaker 2: planned summary. We got purpose defensive operations, offensive operations, Conditions
Speaker 2: for implementation, plan execution, Zombie threat summary. Okay, that's where
Speaker 2: we talk about the different types of zombies. Do we
Speaker 2: have the slow movers? Do we have the robot fast
Speaker 2: removing types?
Speaker 3: Like?
Speaker 2: They break it all down, dude, this is a real
Speaker 2: Department of Defense wording on all of this is an
Speaker 2: official document that they recognize. Let's see uh, environmental effects,
Speaker 2: legal considerations, con plan phases, supporting plan, collateral plans, assumptions,
Speaker 2: operational limits. They talk about their constraints, their restraints, shortfalls,
Speaker 2: and limiting factors. Command relationships, logistics appraising excuse me, logistics appraisal.
Speaker 2: They like have a dollar amount associated with what would
Speaker 2: happen if this was to ever go down. Classification, guidance,
Speaker 2: basic plan, situation, execution, mission statement, commander's intent, area of concern.
Speaker 2: They break this all down like it is a full
Speaker 2: on military plan of action, because it is. It lies.
Speaker 1: Oh that's wild that they go so in depth with it. Oh,
Speaker 1: I did want to mention this last part right here,
Speaker 1: So just going back to the zombie cricket because I
Speaker 1: find this shit fascinating. But it says the zombie cricket
Speaker 1: does not stagger around or start randomly biting people like
Speaker 1: the walking dead. It listen to this, it behaves pretty
Speaker 1: much like a normal cricket, except it doesn't chirp. So
Speaker 1: you could be talking to your mom. You think it's
Speaker 1: your mom. She's acting like your mom, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean. But deep down inside, there's no fucking soul
Speaker 1: left because it's a larva. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's crazy, right, that's fucked Yeah, it is all right.
Speaker 2: So you know, let's just go ahead and start at
Speaker 2: the letter of transmittle. It's a short little bit, and
Speaker 2: then we'll get to the security instructions.
Speaker 1: So the letter of transmitdle the number one, it's the
Speaker 1: cd RUSS Stratcom con Plan eighty eight eighty eight NASH eleven,
Speaker 1: which provides for counter Zobbie dominance operations. Number two. It
Speaker 1: says this document utilizes the format commonly found in US
Speaker 1: Stratcom concepts concept plans, but it is intended for use
Speaker 1: only during the job related training. And the file on
Speaker 1: this letter in front of the plan, it's for the command. Oh,
Speaker 1: for the commander you're talking about Presidentie.
Speaker 2: Well, basically the commander at that time, whoever was the
Speaker 2: one that put these people to work to get this
Speaker 2: plan together.
Speaker 1: Okay, well yeah, then it gets into the name and
Speaker 1: the rank of certain generals and the US Air Force
Speaker 1: Director the plans and policy and whatnot.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that tells you who it is. So this is
Speaker 2: the United States Air Force Director. Okay, brigadier general, name
Speaker 2: in rank, brigadier general. So it wasn't actually written to
Speaker 2: a real general in rank? Yeah was the name brigadier
Speaker 2: general rank name rank, So it's not allegedly to a
Speaker 2: real general, but that would be who would be for
Speaker 2: it'd be to the commander. They would list that out
Speaker 2: and then they go down. So let's go to the
Speaker 2: security instructions.
Speaker 1: All right, it says. The long title of this plan
Speaker 1: is cd rushtrack Com Com Plan eighty eight eighty eight
Speaker 1: the Counter Zombie Dominance Operations. The short title of this
Speaker 1: plan is as I said the cdrusstrat Com. This document
Speaker 1: is unclassified to ensure maximum utility during times of crisis.
Speaker 1: Classified capabilities used to counter zombies will be addressed in
Speaker 1: appropriate orders and annexes adapted during crisis action planning to
Speaker 1: adapt the actions in this plan to current operational conditions.
Speaker 1: This document contains information affecting the national defense of the
Speaker 1: United States within the meaning of the Espionage Laws Title
Speaker 1: eighteen US Code, United States Code, and then Section seven
Speaker 1: ninety three seven ninety four. The transmission or revelation of
Speaker 1: information contained herein in any manner to an unauthorized person
Speaker 1: is prohibited by law. Reproduction of this document is authorized
Speaker 1: for general training purposes. Reproduce only in accordance with guidance
Speaker 1: for reproduction of classified material outlined in DoD fifty two
Speaker 1: hundred one dash Are Information Security Program. If this were
Speaker 1: a real plan, the following language would be included as
Speaker 1: do not reproduce this product without the express written permission
Speaker 1: of the cd rushtrat COM or one of his specified
Speaker 1: subordinate commanders.
Speaker 2: Okay, so fair enough all of that to say it
Speaker 2: is a training guide quote unquote training guide. Okay, cool,
Speaker 2: So we got the planned summary here. The plan fulfills
Speaker 2: fictitional excuse me, contingency planning guide is tasking for the
Speaker 2: USS strat Com for development of comprehension Jobs Level three
Speaker 2: plan to undertake military operations to preserve non zombie humans
Speaker 2: from the threats posed by a zombie horde. Because zombies
Speaker 2: pose a threat to all non zombie human lives hereafter
Speaker 2: referred to as humans, Stratcom will be prepared to preserve
Speaker 2: the sanctity of human life and conduct operations in support
Speaker 2: of any human population, including traditional adversaries. The objectives of
Speaker 2: this plan is threefold. Establish and maintain a vigilant defensive
Speaker 2: condition and aimed at protecting humankind from zombies. B if necessary,
Speaker 2: conduct operations that will, if directed, eradicate zombie threats to
Speaker 2: human safety and CID aid civil authorities in maintaining law
Speaker 2: and order and restoring basic services during and after a
Speaker 2: zombie attack. All right, now, let's go ahead and talk
Speaker 2: about the defensive operations here.
Speaker 1: Those operations aimed at monitoring the environment for zombie related
Speaker 1: threats and preparing capabilities to respond to the same. This
Speaker 1: plans defensive branch within ANXC details protective and preventive measures
Speaker 1: for humans in response to the threat scenarios identified in
Speaker 1: paragraphed six below. The System of Zombie Conditions or z
Speaker 1: coons or zombie cons will provide predetermined actions to proactively
Speaker 1: position the US track Com enterprise in response to threat
Speaker 1: indications and warning.
Speaker 2: Okay, now let's talk a little about both the offensive operations,
Speaker 2: those operations where USS trat Com has been directed to
Speaker 2: eradicate zombie threats to human safety using military capabilities as
Speaker 2: authorized by POTUS and SECTEF. That'll be President of the
Speaker 2: United States and Secretary Defense. By the way, this plan
Speaker 2: offensives branch with NXC and NXS details the neutralization to
Speaker 2: render ineffective of zombie capabilities through denial, deception, disruption, degradation,
Speaker 2: or destruction. The System of Zombie cons will proactively anticipate
Speaker 2: and respond to increase GCC space capability requirements, including offensive
Speaker 2: space control capabilities. So we got the offensive directive if
Speaker 2: you will, and they're going to break down how they
Speaker 2: plan on taking an offensive strategy, and they're also going
Speaker 2: to break down the defensive side of things. This is
Speaker 2: kind of the overview. What are your thoughts at this moment? Man,
Speaker 2: We already got plans in place for the offense, the defense,
Speaker 2: all the way around.
Speaker 1: While I was thinking, you know, it's been a little
Speaker 1: while since I watched I Am Legend. But there's a
Speaker 1: reason for that. I can't stand watching the dog die, dude,
Speaker 1: I just I can't. I don't know why they had
Speaker 1: to include that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, they gotta leave the puffers alone, dude, gotta
Speaker 2: lead the puffers alone, have you know half the audience.
Speaker 2: That's the way.
Speaker 1: That is the way. But yeah, it's interesting how they
Speaker 1: got the defensive and the offensive operations. But I think
Speaker 1: that you would have to need that, you know, if
Speaker 1: this is some kind of outbreak that was completely out
Speaker 1: of their hands. Like did you hear about the monkeys
Speaker 1: that just got loose over in one of the Carolina
Speaker 1: I think it was North Carolina that was like one
Speaker 1: hundred monkeys escaped a biolab.
Speaker 2: Yep, and that's why they had the impox thing. We
Speaker 2: did an episode on that. A couple of weeks ago,
Speaker 2: and they were so worried about monkey pocks, and it's like, yeah, right,
Speaker 2: what time of year is it? Election time? How interesting
Speaker 2: a bunch of monkeys got released in North America where
Speaker 2: there's never been monkeys naturally. There may be a reason,
Speaker 2: we may not have the best environment for that, but yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: that's this, This is the thing. Now.
Speaker 1: I don't like that they're testing on monkeys, to be
Speaker 1: honest with you, a little too close to home. I mean,
Speaker 1: test on a fucking stray cat. Who gives a shit
Speaker 1: about those you know what I mean?
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's fair, that's fair. But mon he's another, you
Speaker 2: know what, a dog too. That's another reason why I
Speaker 2: hate the fucking commies, dude. Okay, you know the Russian
Speaker 2: space ship, the Cosmonautes and all that that Russia was
Speaker 2: the first to send a dog into space. Yeah, come
Speaker 2: to find out, while that may be true, come to
Speaker 2: find out, they didn't put proper heat protection on this craft.
Speaker 2: And the they were gonna kill the dog. They had
Speaker 2: like a little thing, a little uh timer that would
Speaker 2: release food to the dogs where he would eat it
Speaker 2: and die, because they had no plans on bringing this
Speaker 2: dog back to Earth. But then come to find out
Speaker 2: they didn't do the heat shielding right, so the dog
Speaker 2: didn't even get to the point of eating the poison.
Speaker 2: He burned alive on the way up. Yo. Fuck commies.
Speaker 1: Well, first off, I think that that was a fictitious
Speaker 1: story because it was less than a year ago that
Speaker 1: one of the somebody high up within Russia said that
Speaker 1: we've never been to the moon. We've never been to space.
Speaker 1: Do you remember that?
Speaker 2: Well, the Russians have never been to the moon. Even
Speaker 2: according to the main narrative, they they sent a cat up,
Speaker 2: a monkey up, a human up, a dog up, first
Speaker 2: woman in space all that, No, no, no one were the
Speaker 2: ones Americans.
Speaker 1: Excuse me, No, What I'm saying is is that they
Speaker 1: said that not only have they not been to space,
Speaker 1: but nobody ever has. Like this is some high ranking official.
Speaker 2: Yeah, have you seen what the high ranking Russian officials
Speaker 2: have been saying the past couple of years.
Speaker 1: That's one of them.
Speaker 2: Yeah. They also say that you know, Ukraine's ran by Nazis.
Speaker 2: They think that, which isn't wrong. Mobilists are the ones
Speaker 2: coming after Russia, Like they didn't kickstart a war as
Speaker 2: that that is, Yeah, it's incorrect. Jonathan Putin invaded Ukraine.
Speaker 2: Ukraine didn't fire shots into Russia to start this.
Speaker 1: They poked the bear bro.
Speaker 2: Ukraine wanted to join NATO to get off of Russia's
Speaker 2: whole blip and radar. That was the Yeah, was that.
Speaker 1: But they were moving in on Russia. They were lining
Speaker 1: up all their troops surrounding the entire country. Of course
Speaker 1: they're gonna poke back. That's why I like whenever.
Speaker 2: People say at Russia was lining their troops up for
Speaker 2: weeks and everybody was like, hey, what are y'all doing?
Speaker 4: Oh?
Speaker 2: Nothing, And then they invaded Ukraine. Ukraine wasn't putting troops
Speaker 2: on the border. Ukraine didn't have troops to put on
Speaker 2: the border. No, not that much of an army.
Speaker 1: It wasn't Ukraine. But what I'm saying is, I don't
Speaker 1: even want to get into this, but one of the
Speaker 1: things that they were doing, if you look at the
Speaker 1: map of.
Speaker 4: All like.
Speaker 1: What is the name of jo blasts, No, Ukraine wanted
Speaker 1: to join NATO, right And if you look at Russia,
Speaker 1: literally every area around Russia is is controlled by NATO.
Speaker 1: And so they were so they were trying to push
Speaker 1: back and say, no, you're not about to surround us.
Speaker 1: Like imagine if you know, we were not allies with NATO, right,
Speaker 1: and they wanted to surround our entire country with you know,
Speaker 1: with surrounding states. Yes, I know we're kind of on
Speaker 1: an island over here, but like you know what, imagine
Speaker 1: if it was Canada and Mexico and all of South,
Speaker 1: all of South and of America and all that kind
Speaker 1: of shit. Like imagine if that was all like people
Speaker 1: we didn't really fuck with, you would feel some kind
Speaker 1: of way.
Speaker 2: I hear you. And I'm not saying that, like Russia
Speaker 2: shouldn't have done something we NATO, not America. NATO shouldn't
Speaker 2: have taken in any more countries. Russia has protested every
Speaker 2: other new country that has added on into NATO, and
Speaker 2: finally it got to a point to where they had
Speaker 2: to draw a line in the sand. That sucks. It
Speaker 2: was Ukraine, but Russia absolutely fired the first shot, so
Speaker 2: to speak. As far as this goes, they didn't do
Speaker 2: anything to Estonia, they didn't do anything to Macedonia, they
Speaker 2: didn't do anything to Monaegro, they didn't do anything to
Speaker 2: other There's multiple countries that they could have and should
Speaker 2: have done something like this on. But they fucked with
Speaker 2: Crimea in twenty twelve, then they fucked with this whole thing.
Speaker 2: But butside the point, beside the point, well, I guess
Speaker 2: i'ms the look at the fact North Korean troops are
Speaker 2: now fighting on the side of Russia, so like, yeah,
Speaker 2: they are the bad guys. Did you hear what they did?
Speaker 4: No?
Speaker 2: Okay, So we heard reports that the North Korean troops
Speaker 2: on the front lines were getting like slaughtered. And while
Speaker 2: that was true to a degree, and you could tell
Speaker 2: there's videos drone footage of like these dudes in these
Speaker 2: trenches that are like huddled together and then they just
Speaker 2: drop a mortar and get them all. Anybody who's been
Speaker 2: in trench warfare for more than two days knows that
Speaker 2: you don't huddle together. You spread out like ten to
Speaker 2: fifteen meters apart from each other at all times so
Speaker 2: that you don't draw fire to yourself. It was all
Speaker 2: a group of North Koreans that just like huddled together
Speaker 2: because they didn't know, nobody trained them anything. They got
Speaker 2: slaughtered then, then come to find out, so North Koreans
Speaker 2: don't get internet ever, right, Like that's not a thing
Speaker 2: they do even in the military. But Russians do, and
Speaker 2: apparently all of the North Korean men's have now become
Speaker 2: vastly addicted to porn nice like not even like slightly.
Speaker 2: We're talking the weirdest Russian point you could think of.
Speaker 2: They're on Russian Internet now and they've never had cell phones.
Speaker 2: They don't even understand. Like they had to ask their
Speaker 2: commander like, wait, you have a car at your house
Speaker 2: and he's like, yeah, in North Korea only the highest
Speaker 2: ranking of government officials have cars. I guess not a thing.
Speaker 2: So now they're like, wait, what is this. They're giving
Speaker 2: a tablet with full internet access. These dudes are saying, no,
Speaker 2: fuck the war. Have you seen what they're doing to
Speaker 2: these girls? Like what they're a super addicted to porn now?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, it's the same thing as like, uh, what
Speaker 1: is it Elon's fucking satellite internet, right, they're they're because
Speaker 1: it's going over parts of like Africa and stuff and India,
Speaker 1: like parts that never had internet, right, And all of
Speaker 1: the elders are like, look all these kids, they don't
Speaker 1: they don't come out and play anymore. They're just they're
Speaker 1: staying on their phones. They're playing these games. They're addicted
Speaker 1: to porn and it's like, I mean, yeah, that's the
Speaker 1: fucking Internet. But going back to you know, this whole
Speaker 1: Russia and Ukraine thing, the thing that I wanted to
Speaker 1: point out is Jacob. Let's say you're you're at a bar, right,
Speaker 1: and you're at a bar that you don't typically go to.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's a part of town that you've never been to,
Speaker 1: and all these people they seem to be really clicked
Speaker 1: up and for some reason they want to pick on
Speaker 1: the outsider you and you got them all surrounded. Let's
Speaker 1: say there's twenty dudes, right, and you know, damn well,
Speaker 1: you're not going to stand a chance. You know you're
Speaker 1: gonna get your ass. Well, like, that's just how it's
Speaker 1: going to be. There's too many, you're outnumbered. Are you
Speaker 1: going to sit there and curl up in a ball,
Speaker 1: or are you going to try and give it the
Speaker 1: old college, try and punch your way out and do
Speaker 1: everything you possibly can.
Speaker 2: So in this case, seeing as how most of Europe
Speaker 2: was getting their oil and natural gas from Russia and
Speaker 2: it was way more expensive to go another route, I
Speaker 2: would have shut off the pipeline or to Europe, to
Speaker 2: NATO specifically, and not to Ukraine because Ukraine is just
Speaker 2: doing Ukrainian shit. They're just trying to look out for
Speaker 2: their best interest. If NATO has been pushing and pushing
Speaker 2: and pushing, as Russia, I would have declared war on NATO.
Speaker 2: But since we can't declare war, right because that would
Speaker 2: be crazy. You're going against all of NATO. No, just
Speaker 2: cut off all of Europe.
Speaker 1: But you can't do that. You got to you still
Speaker 1: got to survive as a country. If if that is
Speaker 1: your main source of income as a country, you're not
Speaker 1: going to be shutting that off.
Speaker 2: As opposed to losing half a million, going on six
Speaker 2: hundred thousand people.
Speaker 1: You're gonna lose a lot more if you can't feed
Speaker 1: your own fucking people and keep your government going.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well they also have a shit industry because they've
Speaker 2: been shit ram for the past few decades. I mean,
Speaker 2: it's I mean, it's a complicated situation, and I get it.
Speaker 2: But invading Ukraine to try to say that that's the
Speaker 2: thing they want to be Russian. Look at these people
Speaker 2: they voted for it. It's like, no, they didn't. You
Speaker 2: made up those polls and you just invaded in a
Speaker 2: military coup style. Well, yeah, but look, they're traditionally Russian.
Speaker 2: They're not. They're the traditional Cossacks. Never have they ever
Speaker 2: been Russian? Actually, and then then we get into this
Speaker 2: whole big debate about things and stuff. Right. My point is,
Speaker 2: My point is the military elites at the time had
Speaker 2: been lying about shit since day one. You look at
Speaker 2: Russian state TV, you look at the rhetoric they're spewing.
Speaker 2: They are calling America Nazis.
Speaker 1: Look, I'm not saying that there isn't a turn in
Speaker 1: the punch bowl. Well I'm not, like, of course, you're
Speaker 1: talking about government here. There is nobody that is there's
Speaker 1: nobody that's not at fault, But you can't say that
Speaker 1: it is it is entirely Russia's fault that all this
Speaker 1: shit is going on, because it's not.
Speaker 2: If Trump was in office, Russia wouldn't have invaded, and somehow,
Speaker 2: I bet they would have figured a way out.
Speaker 1: Russia wouldn't Russia wouldn't have invaded because Trump would have
Speaker 1: talked to NATO and said, don't press anymore or else
Speaker 1: you're gonna piss Russia off.
Speaker 2: I think mmmmm, I think that he would have figured
Speaker 2: out a way to let Ukraine be a part of NATO,
Speaker 2: and Putin wouldn't have done anything because he knows he
Speaker 2: would have gotten his dick slapped if he did. That's
Speaker 2: and I bet Russia just kind of would have figured
Speaker 2: out away. It's like make ends meet because you know
Speaker 2: you're forced to.
Speaker 1: I don't know, there's always a deal to be made,
Speaker 1: and we don't know what those deals are. Even Trump
Speaker 1: went on to whenever he went on to Rogan's podcast,
Speaker 1: he was saying, like, yeah, I can't tell you exactly
Speaker 1: what those negotiation tactics are going to be, but I
Speaker 1: don't know. This isn't a Russian in Ukraine episode. I
Speaker 1: just wanted to throw that out there because people are
Speaker 1: always saying, oh, Russia is so bad. It's like, really,
Speaker 1: all governments are bad, and there's a reason why that
Speaker 1: was elicited at least, I mean, especially whenever you start
Speaker 1: getting into the whole Nazi talk. There actually were Nazis
Speaker 1: in Ukraine, Like.
Speaker 2: There still are one battalion.
Speaker 1: I mean, how many battalions does it take.
Speaker 2: I mean when you have hundreds and you have one battalion.
Speaker 2: That was like, like I said, it'd be like if
Speaker 2: the Klan got armed by the US government, if we
Speaker 2: ever got invaded and it's like, see they're all they're
Speaker 2: all klansmen. It's like, bro, that's one unit. That's one
Speaker 2: unit out of everybody doing shit out here.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but our country would never allow klansmen to fight
Speaker 1: on our behalf. That's that's the difference. Ukraine is like, yeah,
Speaker 1: we'll take your Nazis cool.
Speaker 2: If we were invaded to the level that Ukraine was invaded,
Speaker 2: I don't know what we would do.
Speaker 3: Well.
Speaker 2: America's different. Fine. America is kind of the exception to
Speaker 2: the rules because we're the world's only superpower, So like, okay,
Speaker 2: for somebody to kind of step up to our level
Speaker 2: and try to slap box us would be suicide by
Speaker 2: any other measure. But if another country, That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 2: It's so situational. It's not like you can do a
Speaker 2: sort of blanket policy on that and say that this
Speaker 2: was the correct way, this was not. I can say that,
Speaker 2: like pretty much a lot of the decisions up until
Speaker 2: this point have been the incorrect decisions. But it's also
Speaker 2: very easy to Monday morning quarterback that from this perspective,
Speaker 2: you know.
Speaker 1: I guess, so, I guess. So it's like, you know
Speaker 1: it makes me think of like the Cleveland Browns, how
Speaker 1: they brought in Deshaun Watson after he just got done
Speaker 1: allegedly raping what was like forty something women, and it's like,
Speaker 1: why are you bringing this guy on? Well, you know,
Speaker 1: we're the Browns, you know, it's Deshaun Watson doesn't define
Speaker 1: who we are. Deshaun Watson is joining us, and it's like,
Speaker 1: except he did all that and nobody wants him as
Speaker 1: your quarterback because of all that, you know what I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 2: No, he doesn't define you. But that's also bad for
Speaker 2: the brand. You know, Branding is kind of a big thing.
Speaker 2: Optics are a really big thing, you know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, anyway, let's get back to the zombies over here.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So, like we said, there's an offensive plan, a
Speaker 2: defensive plan. These are good things. Now let's talk about
Speaker 2: conditions for implementation, Like what would really need to happen
Speaker 2: in order for this plan to go into effect?
Speaker 1: What the where's it at?
Speaker 2: So we got conditions for implementation, So let's start with
Speaker 2: the first one. This is a politico slash military situation.
Speaker 1: Zombies are horribly dangerous to all human life, and zombie
Speaker 1: infections have the potential to seriously undermine national security and
Speaker 1: economic activities that sustain our way of life. Therefore, having
Speaker 1: a population that is not composed of zombies or at
Speaker 1: risk from their malign influences is vital to US and
Speaker 1: allied national interest. While the US currently enjoys the several
Speaker 1: asymmetric advantages in against zombie infections originating in the Eurasian
Speaker 1: land mass, why is it gonna be originating over there?
Speaker 2: Well, I mean, if something was to pop off, that
Speaker 2: would be like the worst place, right because the Eurasian
Speaker 2: land mass also connects to Africa, So if something popped
Speaker 2: off there, it could take out three continents from that
Speaker 2: one spawn point, if you will.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, but it's saying that it would have several
Speaker 1: advantages in zombie infections originating in Eurasian land masses.
Speaker 2: Well, because we'd have a jump on the situation. If
Speaker 2: it was to start in North America, South America, it's
Speaker 2: on our front step, you know what I mean. If
Speaker 2: it starts over there, we got a little bit of
Speaker 2: an advantage.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, that makes sense. It says these advantages can
Speaker 1: easily be negated by air and sea traffic that could
Speaker 1: transport them. The source of zombie infection to North and
Speaker 1: South America. Further, asteroids and nuclear space radiation can convert
Speaker 1: people into zombies, or that can conver people into zombies
Speaker 1: can affect any land mass or population on Earth. Given
Speaker 1: the rapidity at which zombie outbreaks spread, decisive, overwhelming, and
Speaker 1: possibly unilateral military force may be required to get to
Speaker 1: negate the zombie threat.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we're going deep on this one, dude. They're not
Speaker 2: just talking about some viral outbreak. It might be a
Speaker 2: space meteor that comes down and the radiation turns people
Speaker 2: into zombies. It might be some voodoo chakanery that turns
Speaker 2: people from the grave rising from the ground. This is
Speaker 2: all in the plan, dude.
Speaker 1: And by the way, this is I think that this
Speaker 1: is obviously some kind of think take operation. They mentioned
Speaker 1: it before.
Speaker 2: But allegedly.
Speaker 1: But let's also keep in mind, like you know, all
Speaker 1: the people that were saying that Trump was part of
Speaker 1: a Project twenty twenty five and going down all that
Speaker 1: shit like that was think tank shit. It's not necessarily
Speaker 1: something that's implemented, but it is something that could be
Speaker 1: implemented that you could, you know, nitpick from if Trump
Speaker 1: were to do that. Hopefully he doesn't, but and I
Speaker 1: don't think that he will because he's Agenda forty seven
Speaker 1: and all that fun jazz.
Speaker 2: But the Heritage Foundation is a think tank. This is
Speaker 2: the Department of Defense, and they could put all the
Speaker 2: disclaimers and say that it's not official documentation all they want.
Speaker 2: But it was only released from the Department of Defense
Speaker 2: because of a freedom of information request, So we can
Speaker 2: we can argue the specifics of whether this was just
Speaker 2: for training purposes or if they actually had some prior
Speaker 2: knowledge that they were putting down on papers, so the
Speaker 2: US government had something on the books. Hey, it agreed.
Speaker 2: But but it seems more likely that the fact that
Speaker 2: this wasn't just released right after, like hey, y'all, we
Speaker 2: had this fun weekend, we came up with a couple
Speaker 2: of fun ideas. Here you go, Internet, take it, do
Speaker 2: your thing with it. It had to be released years later.
Speaker 2: I think this might be more towards realm of being serious.
Speaker 2: It could be wrong.
Speaker 1: That's interesting that it was a Foyer request. Yeah, who
Speaker 1: the fuck was request this? If it's just a if
Speaker 1: it's just a fun game truthers, truth sir? That makes sense.
Speaker 2: All right, let's talk about the plan execution.
Speaker 1: Conplan eighty eight. Eighty eight is designed to be implemented
Speaker 1: across all six phases of military operations. When directed by
Speaker 1: the President or the Secretary of Defense, the strat Com
Speaker 1: will issue mission type orders or alert alert ORD, warn ORD, depoured, OH,
Speaker 1: poured x ORD or term ord all the debate order.
Speaker 2: That's different types of orders, right, the adjudant, the warning,
Speaker 2: the deportion, the operation, the x fill, and the termination
Speaker 2: of like execution of. So it's it's all like steps
Speaker 2: in the military planning process.
Speaker 1: And they would use those to execute specific actions from
Speaker 1: or yeah, from this plan. This plan is only designed
Speaker 1: to be implemented if zombie threats arise, which cannot be
Speaker 1: handled within the scope of the US strat Com Campaign
Speaker 1: Plan L and current fiscal year OH boards that direct
Speaker 1: the execution of actions from OP Plant eight thousand.
Speaker 2: Okay, so right here we're going into the threats summary.
Speaker 2: Zombie Threats Summary COMPLANT Today Today Day is designed to
Speaker 2: address the following types of zombie threats. Pathogen zombies pz pzs,
Speaker 2: or zombie life forms created after an organism is infected
Speaker 2: by a virus or bacteria or some other form of contagion.
Speaker 2: Radiation zombies. These are r z's rzs, or zombie life
Speaker 2: forms created after an organism is infected by an extreme
Speaker 2: dosage of electromagnetic and or particular particle radiation. Okay, we
Speaker 2: have EMZ evil magic zombies, emzs, or zombies life forms
Speaker 2: created via some form of occult experimentation in what might
Speaker 2: otherwise be referred to as evil magic. Yes, the Department
Speaker 2: of Defense has a plan to fight evil magic zombies.
Speaker 2: Space zombies SZ Yes, that's correct, szs or zombie life
Speaker 2: forms originating from space or created by a toxic contamination
Speaker 2: of the Earth environment via some form of extraterrestrial toxin
Speaker 2: or radiation. Also with that, we have the subaddendum of
Speaker 2: zombie satellites that can be classified as sz's. However, they
Speaker 2: pose no danger to humans unless they conduct an unplanned
Speaker 2: de orbit. Typically, zombie satellites only pose a threat to
Speaker 2: satcom services like DirecTV referred to Galaxy fifteen incident May
Speaker 2: twenty ten.
Speaker 1: So zombie satellites.
Speaker 2: Yeah, go ahead and look at the Galaxy fifteen incident
Speaker 2: in May of twenty ten. Go ahead and search that
Speaker 2: on your end, because I'm actually kind of curious why
Speaker 2: they would bring up a direct TV satellite with some
Speaker 2: form of an incident in that timeframe, right around the
Speaker 2: time that this was being written up. I might add,
Speaker 2: all right, so we've talked about space zombies a little bit.
Speaker 2: While you're searching that, let's talk about weaponized zombies WUZ.
Speaker 2: Weaponized zombies are life forms deliberately created via bio or
Speaker 2: biomechanical engineering for the purpose of being employed as weapons.
Speaker 2: Zombie weaponization programs and supporting infrastructure are included in coas
Speaker 2: to deal with these threats. Subdid in them too. This,
Speaker 2: the movie The Crazies, exemplifies the most common type of wz's,
Speaker 2: humans turned into zombies via exposure to toxic chemicals or gases.
Speaker 1: I'm so happy that movie got a shout out. Dude,
Speaker 1: that is a great movie, The Crazies.
Speaker 2: I thought, so too. Real quick, have you seen anything
Speaker 2: about that direct TV thing? Before I move on to.
Speaker 1: Yes, I do have it here, my good man.
Speaker 2: All right, let's talk about it, all right.
Speaker 1: It is Galaxy fifteen. Galaxy fifteen is an American telecommunication
Speaker 1: satellite which is owned by Intel SAT. It was launched
Speaker 1: for and originally operated by pan Am Sat, and was
Speaker 1: subsequently transferred to intel SAT when two companies merged in
Speaker 1: two thousand and six. It was originally positioned in geostationary
Speaker 1: orbit at a longitude of one hundred and one hundred
Speaker 1: and thirty three degrees west, from where it was used
Speaker 1: to provide communication services to North America. But in April
Speaker 1: of twenty ten, intel Sat lost control of the satellite
Speaker 1: and it began to drift away from its orbital slot,
Speaker 1: with the potential to cause disruption to other satellites in
Speaker 1: its path. On December twenty seventh of twenty ten, intel
Speaker 1: Sat reported that the satellite had rebooted as per design
Speaker 1: and the command unit was responding to commands again. In addition,
Speaker 1: the satellite had been secured in safe mode and the
Speaker 1: potential for interference issues from Galaxy fifteen had been seized.
Speaker 1: Intel Sat repositioned Galaxy fifteen to its original location on
Speaker 1: April four to twenty eleven, and then on August tenth
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty two, intel SAT again lost control of
Speaker 1: Galaxy fifteen, attributing it to a space weather event.
Speaker 2: A space weather event, how about that?
Speaker 3: So?
Speaker 1: It says Galaxy fifteen was constructed or constructed by Orbital
Speaker 1: sciences cooperation and was based around the Geostar DASH two
Speaker 1: satellite bus. The contract for its manufacturer was signed in
Speaker 1: two thousand and one, and at the time it was
Speaker 1: to have been it was to have been identical to
Speaker 1: the Galaxy twelve and Galaxy fourteen satellites, which were also
Speaker 1: on order. In two thousand and three, the contrast was
Speaker 1: changed to allow the addition of more transponders to support
Speaker 1: the US government's geostationary Communications and Control Segment Wide Area
Speaker 1: Augmentation System and US Federal Aviation Administration NA Navigation Program. Okay,
Speaker 1: so yeah, all right, well, yeah, I guess they lost
Speaker 1: control of the Galaxy fifteen, and I guess nothing really
Speaker 1: happened as a result. But what they were saying is
Speaker 1: is that you lost control, there's no telling what could
Speaker 1: happen whenever you lose something in fucking space like that.
Speaker 2: And they're saying that if the space zombies have some
Speaker 2: sort of zombie satellite and it loses control because of
Speaker 2: space weather, it could crash into Earth and that could
Speaker 2: be detrimental to humans, but the satellite itself may not be.
Speaker 2: So they gave that little addendum to that one as well,
Speaker 2: And I promise they're going to go in depth on
Speaker 2: all this.
Speaker 1: There's already a satellite that's out there controlling the Earth,
Speaker 1: the Dark Knight. Well there's that, But I was talking
Speaker 1: about the moon.
Speaker 2: Oh that, Hey, who knows.
Speaker 1: Some people say that the moon was actually constructed on
Speaker 1: Jupiter like millions of years ago by some kind of
Speaker 1: civilization over there, and that the moon that is in
Speaker 1: our sky right now is said to just monitor us.
Speaker 1: And uh, also it affects certain things like, you know,
Speaker 1: tidal waves and whatnot.
Speaker 2: Some people believe that all life on this Earth spawned
Speaker 2: from the moon thirty three billion years ago. Uh, and
Speaker 2: the tribe of Shabbaz came down with the prophet Yakoub
Speaker 2: and all that like praise Bee knew really his name,
Speaker 2: blessings under his name? Yes, indeed, indeed, all right, So
Speaker 2: let's also go into these sinmbi induced zombies si Z
Speaker 2: Symbient induce zombie are life forms originating from the introduction
Speaker 2: of a symbiotic or symbient life form into an otherwise
Speaker 2: healthy host. Although the symptoms of as symbient zombieism is
Speaker 2: similar in most regards to pathogenic zombism, the symbiant does
Speaker 2: not kill the host or organism quickly or at all. However,
Speaker 2: there is no known way to save an organism after
Speaker 2: zombism has occurred, even if the symbiant is removed.
Speaker 1: Oh well yeah, because at that point, the soul that
Speaker 1: is within the human body or whatever is gone because
Speaker 1: the body is now being animated by said you know symbiote.
Speaker 2: Okay, let's go ahead and read about vegetarian zombies v zs.
Speaker 2: Vegetarian zombies are zombie life forms originating from any cause,
Speaker 2: but pose no direct threat to humans because they only
Speaker 2: eat plant life, as induded by the popular game Plants
Speaker 2: Versus Zombies, which is funny because my son is playing
Speaker 2: that as we speak. Plants Versus Zombies two Garden Warfare?
Speaker 1: Is that a fun game? Have you ever played it?
Speaker 4: Oh?
Speaker 2: Dude, Garden Warfare two is our is our shit. I'm
Speaker 2: waiting on them to come out with three. It's fun
Speaker 2: as hell. Think of Call of Duty four kids. There's
Speaker 2: no kills or blood. There's vanquishes and there's no blood.
Speaker 2: There's like slime from the plants. They are like purple
Speaker 2: gunk from the zombies. Super cartoony. But also, you got
Speaker 2: like your sniper right if you've got your machine gun,
Speaker 2: but it's a plant that's shooting like peas and stuff.
Speaker 1: It's really cool, But that's like pokemon. Like nobody ever died.
Speaker 1: They only fainted right, right, right right.
Speaker 2: So that being the case, there we go. Although vzs
Speaker 2: do not attack humans or other animal life, they will
Speaker 2: consume all plant life in front of them. They can
Speaker 2: cause massive deforestation or elimination of basic food crops essential
Speaker 2: to human life, i e. Rice, corn, and soybeans. A
Speaker 2: little addendum to that of note, where normal carniv cart carnivorous,
Speaker 2: where normal carnivorous zo bombie commonly grown the word brains
Speaker 2: semi comprehensibly. Vzs can be identified by their aversion to humans,
Speaker 2: affirm affinity to plants, and their tendency to semi comprehensibly
Speaker 2: grown the word grains. Of course, that was pretty cool.
Speaker 2: I'm not gonna lie. I've never heard of Vegetarian zombies
Speaker 2: are people that get affected with zombie ism and just
Speaker 2: take off after the lea green leafies.
Speaker 1: I need your grains.
Speaker 2: I've never heard of that, and I'm not gonna lie.
Speaker 2: Never heard of this. Bottom one here, chicken zombies see
Speaker 2: z get ready for this one. Although it sounds ridiculous.
Speaker 2: This is actually the one proven class of zombie that
Speaker 2: actually exists. Allegedly. CZ's were first documented in Jonathan M.
Speaker 2: Forrester's two thousand and six written on December fourth, actually
Speaker 2: online article Zombie Chickens taking over California. Czs occur when
Speaker 2: old hens that can no longer lay eggs are incorrectly
Speaker 2: euthanized by poultry farmers using carbon monoxide. The hens are
Speaker 2: de deposed, excuse me, deposited in large piles to decompose. There.
Speaker 2: The hens appear to be dead when buried, but unexplicably
Speaker 2: come back to life and dig themselves out from the
Speaker 2: piles of dead chickens. After reaching the surface, cz stagger
Speaker 2: about for a period of time before ultimately expiring doing
Speaker 2: to internal organ failure. Um, so, chicken zombies are absolutely
Speaker 2: a real thing. Apparently I could see it.
Speaker 1: Uh carbon monoxide, which is pretty interesting. Isn't that what
Speaker 1: they were putting into the uh, the suicide pods.
Speaker 2: Maybe I'm crazy because I don't know how it goes
Speaker 2: down a poultry farm. When your chicken stops laying, that's
Speaker 2: when you make like chicken soup, like just because it's
Speaker 2: not laying. Eggs. Doesn't mean that the chicken meat is
Speaker 2: now bad. That means that's what's for dinner.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, why would you euthanize it? Just chop the
Speaker 1: fucking head off and that's what you're having for dinner tonight.
Speaker 2: Now, maybe if it's like an industrial chicken farm where
Speaker 2: it's like eight hundred thousand chickens per warehouse quote unquote, uh,
Speaker 2: you know, field are free range because there's like one
Speaker 2: square yard of sunlight in the middle of the warehouse
Speaker 2: or some shit whatever. But like, if that's the case
Speaker 2: and you have that many dead chickens a day, I
Speaker 2: get it, but it also just seems like a waste
Speaker 2: to me. I don't know it, do it? Do?
Speaker 1: I mean? And wasn't there a shortage of chicken wings
Speaker 1: a couple of years ago, like for the Super Bowl
Speaker 1: because of COVID or whatever it was. It's like, well,
Speaker 1: stop euthanizing the damn chickens then, and let's eat them.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, COVID made shortages of everything, even though the
Speaker 2: people that were like running the trucks and like running
Speaker 2: the stores and stuff, they never stopped going to work.
Speaker 2: Walmart never closed, but like somehow everything was just short
Speaker 2: it was weird, so weird.
Speaker 1: And I don't like how Walmart's not twenty four hours anymore?
Speaker 1: Are we not done with?
Speaker 2: Come on? Yeah? Well what the fuck? Knowing damn good
Speaker 2: and well that we got shit that we need at
Speaker 2: two in the morning. Sometimes there's nowhere open anymore. I
Speaker 2: thought this was America, dude.
Speaker 1: That was some of my favorite pastime is just going
Speaker 1: up to Walmart whenever. You know, it's a late night,
Speaker 1: you don't feel like doing any but you feel like
Speaker 1: going in Gallivanton a little bit, and maybe I just
Speaker 1: want to go buy some honeymoons, you know what I mean.
Speaker 2: I mean like, it's not like they're not stocking the
Speaker 2: shelves at that time. There's somebody at the Walmart twenty
Speaker 2: four to seven, you know what I mean. If you're
Speaker 2: already stocking shells, that means the lights are already on,
Speaker 2: the air condition's already on, everything is already where like
Speaker 2: you're you're running. Why not have the doors open and
Speaker 2: make a little bit of money too. I don't whatever.
Speaker 2: It's all self check out anyway, That's.
Speaker 1: All I was about to say.
Speaker 2: It's signating an employee for the cash register, Like what
Speaker 2: the fuck?
Speaker 1: Yeah, it makes no sense. I will say that I'm
Speaker 1: happy that McDonald's finally brought back the uh, the steak bagel.
Speaker 1: It's about Dan Poh.
Speaker 2: Praise be to God.
Speaker 1: That shit is fire. I could eat that all day.
Speaker 2: I'm telling you, Thank God. The places are starting to
Speaker 2: bring back what's right and proper. Taco Bell brought back
Speaker 2: the Mexican pizza, and it's not my jam, but I
Speaker 2: also support those that do hold it down with that,
Speaker 2: you know what I mean, Like, let's just keep it simple,
Speaker 2: let's keep it good. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I was never a fan of the Mexican pizza, but
Speaker 1: I mean, if the people want it, you should provide it.
Speaker 2: Taco Bell used to have the triple XL steak burrito.
Speaker 2: We want that back, we really do.
Speaker 1: I'll take that. Yeah, I'll definitely take that, you know.
Speaker 2: But anyway, anyway, talking about about the chicken in that way,
Speaker 2: CZ's are simply terrifying to behold, and they are likely
Speaker 2: only to make people become vegetarians to protest to protest
Speaker 2: animal cruelty. They appear to be no direct threat to humans.
Speaker 2: They are different from wz's because they are the result
Speaker 2: of actions taking to kill a living organism. Vice actions
Speaker 2: taking to deliberately reanimate dead organisms or impure life functions
Speaker 2: to be a minimal function. So basically saying that chicken zombies,
Speaker 2: while they are a thing, they're not really a threat.
Speaker 2: Let's not worry about that now. Let's talk about the
Speaker 2: environmental effects. What would this What would this do to
Speaker 2: the earth if a zombie apocalypse was to happen.
Speaker 1: Jonathan, causes of zombie infection are generally resistant to most
Speaker 1: environmental effects. The following environmental factors apply to zombies in
Speaker 1: this plan. The viral pathogens that cause pzs have some
Speaker 1: vulnerability to ultraviolent light. Uv light impairs the functions of
Speaker 1: ribonucleic acids that comprise most vital life forms. At best,
Speaker 1: UV light can disrupt virus reproduction in healthy cells. It
Speaker 1: should be noted that pzs may experience painful photosensitivity as
Speaker 1: a result of sunlight exposure. For this reason, PZ activity
Speaker 1: is not expected to be as high during bright sunny
Speaker 1: conditions as it's as it is during the hours of darkness.
Speaker 1: So then it gets into the EMZ, the SZ, the VZ,
Speaker 1: the wz s. All the zombies are likely hold.
Speaker 2: On, hold on, so that's talking about plant zombies. They
Speaker 2: would need, right, some daylight, so it's saying that basically
Speaker 2: the UV light would obviously affect them. But then we
Speaker 2: talk about the All right, let's break this down, weaponize zombies,
Speaker 2: viral zombies, symbian and zombies, and evil magic zombies. All right,
Speaker 2: here we go.
Speaker 1: Why's magic always got to be evil?
Speaker 2: Bro, Well, it's saying specifically evil magic. Right, If it
Speaker 2: was good magic, zombies wouldn't be a conversation or at
Speaker 2: least the threat to human life type of zombies, So
Speaker 2: we are specifically talking about evil occult.
Speaker 1: Experimentation makes sense. Okay, Well, they're all likely immune to
Speaker 1: any extreme meteor meteor logical phenomena except fires, floods, tornadoes,
Speaker 1: or tsunamis.
Speaker 2: So we do know the government can create some certain things.
Speaker 2: So they're saying that if these zombies are out there,
Speaker 2: they probably they are immune to any type of weather
Speaker 2: phenomenon that they could create. So right out, that's out.
Speaker 1: The following environmental factors apply to humans in this plan.
Speaker 1: Rain will be vitally important to human survival. If civil
Speaker 1: water supplies are cut off, humans will have to rely
Speaker 1: on other means to obtain water. Groundwater from streams and
Speaker 1: rivers will be unreliable since it will be difficult to
Speaker 1: determine if groundwater is a vector for zombie infection. The
Speaker 1: second one it gets into. Humans who do not shelter
Speaker 1: in place within a sturdy structure that protects them from
Speaker 1: the direct effects of air currents that could carry pathogens
Speaker 1: or toxins or direct exposure to radiation will be at
Speaker 1: an increased risk of contamination, death, or injury.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Absolutely, If you're in a place that you can't
Speaker 2: like secure the air vents and it is an airborne
Speaker 2: pathogen or something like that, you're not safe. You're not secure. Adversely,
Speaker 2: if you're in a place with like weak windows or
Speaker 2: something and these things are trying to break in and
Speaker 2: get you, you have to be in a sturdy structure. Absolutely.
Speaker 1: Although these threat scenarios aren't meant to be all inclusive,
Speaker 1: us trat COM must be postured and flexible enough to
Speaker 1: respond to any emerging threat due to different zombie disaster scenarios.
Speaker 1: NXC Appendix one Defensive Operations and NXC Appendix two Offensive
Speaker 1: Operations provide a solid foundation for full spectrum operations against
Speaker 1: most postulated zombie threats.
Speaker 2: Okay, now before we get into the legal considerations, because
Speaker 2: you know, probably zombies might have some rights to who
Speaker 2: fucking knows anymore, Right before we talk about that. Your
Speaker 2: thoughts at this time, Bro, they're talking, they're breaking down
Speaker 2: the types of zombies. They're gonna talk about ways of
Speaker 2: fighting and de turring each of those individually. Where are
Speaker 2: you at?
Speaker 1: You know, I will say, I'm really not surprised that
Speaker 1: the government thought to do, like lay out a plan
Speaker 1: like this, because they do have all these different wargaming
Speaker 1: tactics and all the different wargaming plans. And ultimately I
Speaker 1: think that you know, if we look all throughout Hollywood,
Speaker 1: how many fucking zombie movies have there been, like a lot?
Speaker 1: And if and if you know a lot of what
Speaker 1: like Hollywood.
Speaker 2: They named a movie a moment ago as a matter
Speaker 2: of fact, and they're going to do that throughout this
Speaker 2: to show like references like this type. You might recognize
Speaker 2: it from this absolutely.
Speaker 1: Right, And if a lot of what Hollywood is doing
Speaker 1: is foreshadowing or forecasting what is to come in the future,
Speaker 1: you know, i e. Planting the seed to be more
Speaker 1: accustomed to you know, what you're supposed to do. If
Speaker 1: there is said to be some kind of zombie outright
Speaker 1: or outbreak rather. But I will say, like obviously, like
Speaker 1: Hollywood does do a lot of shit for the money,
Speaker 1: but at the same time, there is some kind of
Speaker 1: subliminal messaging in here that way, you know. The thought
Speaker 1: is is that if you introduce certain ideas to the
Speaker 1: subconscious of the people, that they won't just automatically go
Speaker 1: crazy and start looting and doing all this wild shit
Speaker 1: and just lose the basic structure that we've created over here,
Speaker 1: at least in the United States. The thought is is that, well,
Speaker 1: this is already in the human sight, and you've already
Speaker 1: seen what those other people have done to survive. I
Speaker 1: don't know, I mean, I think check this out if like,
Speaker 1: all right, well we already saw COVID and how people
Speaker 1: reacted to that, and people were going crazy, people were
Speaker 1: staying home, they were wearing seventeen masks, they were getting
Speaker 1: you know, eighteen different jabs in order to protect it.
Speaker 1: And most of that was most of the COVID virus
Speaker 1: was kind of just a light version of the flu. Right,
Speaker 1: So it's really all about what you make the people believe,
Speaker 1: not necessarily what the actual sickness is. So if you're
Speaker 1: somebody aka the government, the president, whatever, maybe it's a
Speaker 1: foreign military or some kind of shit like that, and
Speaker 1: you say, there are there is a zombie outbreak, stay
Speaker 1: in your house, you know, wear a mask or whatever
Speaker 1: you got to do, don't get contaminated, don't drink the water,
Speaker 1: you shouldn't trust your food anymore. Well, that would be
Speaker 1: a really good tactic to really infringe upon the people's rights,
Speaker 1: because the people now built within the psyche, they're like, well,
Speaker 1: I've seen zombie oubreak. I ain't going nowhere, and so
Speaker 1: this would be a good way to you know, kind
Speaker 1: of like carry out some kind of government operational plan.
Speaker 1: You know, like that's the way I look at it.
Speaker 1: So is it going to be zombies? Maybe not. People
Speaker 1: will say, oh, it's a joke that zombies are existing,
Speaker 1: even though it is found in nature, and even though
Speaker 1: it has happened to chickens. But you know what I mean,
Speaker 1: like people are already believing it. So that way, if
Speaker 1: they introduce there is a zombie outbreak plan, people kind
Speaker 1: of already are stepping in line knowing what to do.
Speaker 1: I think that's how this this, you know, this whole
Speaker 1: operation really is. It's kind of like a you know,
Speaker 1: kind of like an outline of how to It's a
Speaker 1: one into the minds of the humans, you know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a what if and it talks about securing
Speaker 2: human life. We're talking about water tables, making sure they're
Speaker 2: not contaminated. We're gonna talk about food here in a
Speaker 2: little bit, transportation, all of these things get brought up.
Speaker 2: This is a very comprehensive plan. But that being said,
Speaker 2: towards the end of this, we're gonna talk about if
Speaker 2: this is a thing that we are you know, hey,
Speaker 2: maybe it was an experiment and it was never meant
Speaker 2: to be taken serious. Again, if that was the case,
Speaker 2: why did it take a Freedom of Information Act to
Speaker 2: get it? But then we're gonna talk about something that
Speaker 2: they found not too terribly long ago in the permafrost
Speaker 2: that might make this a little bit more of a
Speaker 2: real plan that may get implemented. Maybe yes, maybe no,
Speaker 2: We will talk about it. Before we get there. Let's
Speaker 2: talk about the legal consideration.
Speaker 1: US and international law regulate military operations only in so
Speaker 1: far as human and animal life are concerned. There are
Speaker 1: almost no restrictions on hostile actions that may be taken
Speaker 1: either defensively or offensively against pathogenic life forms. I'm sorry
Speaker 1: against pathogenic life forms, organic robotic entities, or traditional zombies, given.
Speaker 2: The likelyri quick, real quick, before we talk about the
Speaker 2: organic robotic entities or the traditional zombies, one more time,
Speaker 2: on that sentence, there are almost no restrictions on how
Speaker 2: style actions that may be taken, either defensively or offensively
Speaker 2: against pathogenic life forms. I just want people to let
Speaker 2: that sentence marinade on their brains while we continue into
Speaker 2: this and you tell me what could or could not
Speaker 2: be considered a pathogenic life form here in the very
Speaker 2: near future. But let's continue.
Speaker 1: Well, and there's there's no restrictions as to what you
Speaker 1: can do with these entities. So if you want to
Speaker 1: fuck one, you can.
Speaker 2: No.
Speaker 5: No.
Speaker 2: If you want a torch one alive, there's no Geneva
Speaker 2: convention protecting that. If you want to gas them, yeah,
Speaker 2: I mean round them.
Speaker 1: If you want to hike one of them up on
Speaker 1: a cross and sacrifice them, you get.
Speaker 2: Granted, we're talking about an alleged pathogenic life form. But
Speaker 2: at the same time, how quickly could COVID have been
Speaker 2: it was considered a live virus? How quickly. Could that
Speaker 2: have been called a live pathogen? And whoever's now carrying
Speaker 2: it is a carrier of the pathogen, and so now
Speaker 2: it's under you see what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: Well, also, I do want to point out like, because
Speaker 1: we are using COVID, it's the most recent kind of thing.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, that's what spurned this whole thing in my brain. Dude,
Speaker 2: This whole deep dive was because I was thinking of
Speaker 2: the bullshit from twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: Was it COVID that was making people put on all
Speaker 1: these masks? Was it COVID that was making people line
Speaker 1: up in the stores? Was it COVID that got the
Speaker 1: people that said, well, the only way you can get
Speaker 1: on this plane or into this restaurant is if you
Speaker 1: get this vaccine.
Speaker 2: Was it the.
Speaker 1: Actual virus that was scaring people or was it the
Speaker 1: media's manipulation that was scaring people?
Speaker 2: It was mandates, but not laws. No law was actually passed,
Speaker 2: but there was mandates, right, and it was the officiating bodies,
Speaker 2: so they were restricting people. It wasn't the sickness.
Speaker 1: So the true virus was the media. Do you see
Speaker 1: what I'm saying?
Speaker 2: I do?
Speaker 1: Okay, just want to throw that out there, and so
Speaker 1: the true virus was the media and all these different
Speaker 1: you know, like corporations and entities and stuff like that.
Speaker 1: The virus itself wasn't making people panic. So I just
Speaker 1: want to throw that out there that this is a
Speaker 1: lot of mental manipulation. So if you really think about it,
Speaker 1: the actual fungus that was taking over our bodies during
Speaker 1: COVID was that of the psyche, if you want to
Speaker 1: look at it that way.
Speaker 2: Right, And yes, we're not saying that COVID was like
Speaker 2: the sniffles weren't real. Yes, yes, the virus is real,
Speaker 2: but that's not what we're talking about here. We're talking
Speaker 2: about the virus that spread throughout the culture that made
Speaker 2: people actually scared and turned them into people just take
Speaker 2: it as another flu season.
Speaker 1: And turned them into some kind of zombie.
Speaker 2: Some sort of entity void of independent thought, who's just
Speaker 2: following whatever their commander told them. That that sounds pretty
Speaker 2: zombie like to me.
Speaker 1: If it wasn't for one of these types, if it
Speaker 1: wasn't for the media scaring the shit out of people
Speaker 1: and CNN putting up the fucking death holes on every
Speaker 1: single program that they had, would you have Karen with
Speaker 1: blue hair. I mean, I'm not you know, say anything
Speaker 1: about blue hair. I had purple hair at one point,
Speaker 1: but just the crazies, would you have fucking Karen saying,
Speaker 1: but your fucking mask go on, your killing people. It's ma'am,
Speaker 1: it's may it's ma'am. So see, the virus is really
Speaker 1: of the mind, is really you know the point that
Speaker 1: I was trying to make there.
Speaker 2: I keep forgetting about old GameStop she mail and like
Speaker 2: it always like randomly pops into my brainy. That was great.
Speaker 1: Although yeah, no, I went to, uh, you've ever been
Speaker 1: to La Madeline, the French restaurant La Madeleine.
Speaker 2: Dude, dude, I love that Belgian it's a Belgian police.
Speaker 1: No, no, it's French. Huh yeah.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: They have like French everything inside of the inside of
Speaker 1: the restaurant. But I went there last night and there
Speaker 1: was definitely a they them that was serving us. And
Speaker 1: it was strange because you see tits on this person
Speaker 1: but also a beard, and I'm like, I don't know
Speaker 1: what to call you.
Speaker 2: Wait, wait, you were in Louisiana. You're in Texas, Texas, Okay,
Speaker 2: I thought that was the one out here. I was like, wait,
Speaker 2: which restaurant. Were you at never mind mine?
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's really strange. I don't know what to say.
Speaker 2: I mean, just read the name tag, you know, and
Speaker 2: just call the name that seems to be the safest. Bet.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's probably like a Chris where it could be
Speaker 1: a male or female or like an Alex kind of thing.
Speaker 2: Chris spelled g u s s. It's pronounced Chris. Like, bro, what.
Speaker 1: It's all x u A and my name is Gia.
Speaker 2: Are you talking meculous thing? There's like five letters. Yeah,
Speaker 2: the name is jejozah Fat Like, bro, No, it's fucking
Speaker 2: not what bro.
Speaker 1: Beauty is in the ivy of the beholder, Sir.
Speaker 2: I I'm not saying that. I'm saying people keep naming
Speaker 2: their kids random shit and then like calling them something
Speaker 2: that doesn't spell what they just spelled. There's like eighteen
Speaker 2: ways of spell Megan, Like, that's fucking absurd, you know
Speaker 2: what I mean.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, well, then then there's the shiftids out there.
Speaker 2: You know, there be some shit thiads.
Speaker 1: There be somes. But anyway, it says given the likelihood
Speaker 1: of an all out threat of human survival, it is
Speaker 1: likely that the plan will be executed concurrently. With the
Speaker 1: declaration of martial law within kN US what's that contin
Speaker 1: mil US, Okay, and US territories. Additional legal considerations taken
Speaker 1: into account when preparing this plan include applicable US statutes,
Speaker 1: the US or the United Nations Center, international treaties and
Speaker 1: agreements to which the US is a party, the law
Speaker 1: of armed conflict, customary international law, and applicable rules of
Speaker 1: engagement and policies.
Speaker 2: Yeah, dude, all right, So they had these charts laid
Speaker 2: out where and I mean, we're gonna get into the
Speaker 2: operations to be conducted. There's the deployment and the employment
Speaker 2: of US troops for this. They had these things to say,
Speaker 2: like defensive ops and the offensive ops of what would
Speaker 2: happen next. And we'll read through the phases here phase
Speaker 2: zero to phase five. But before we do that, let's
Speaker 2: read a little bit of the deployment and the employment. Actually,
Speaker 2: i'll take that one if you want. Deployment of US
Speaker 2: stract com forces specified in the Forces table of the
Speaker 2: current fiscal year up board are deployed around the globe.
Speaker 2: This com plan has no pre identified primary adversaries. Therefore,
Speaker 2: it does not direct forward deployment of forces into any
Speaker 2: particular region. When US stract comm is the quote unquote
Speaker 2: supported CCDR. US trat COOM will develop during crisis a
Speaker 2: time phased force and deployment data in collaboration with the
Speaker 2: US tract Com for those situations when offensive and defensive
Speaker 2: operations require movement of forces or assets. However, when USS
Speaker 2: stract Com deploys forces as a supporting commander, those forces
Speaker 2: will normally be tied to the supported theater commander's TPFDD.
Speaker 2: So basically, it's saying that we don't have a region
Speaker 2: of the world in mind when we talk about deploying forces. However,
Speaker 2: we do need to talk about deploying forces dot dot dot.
Speaker 2: You see what I'm saying, kind of to whom it
Speaker 2: may concern or to where it may concern. So all right,
Speaker 2: let's talk about the employment of military forces here. Complan
Speaker 2: A eight eight eight is situationally dependent. It is designed
Speaker 2: to allow USS trat Com executive military operations in support
Speaker 2: of national OAR theater objectives in either a supporting o
Speaker 2: R supported role or Yeah, well, I know it's supposed
Speaker 2: to stand for an acronym and they probably said it earlier.
Speaker 1: National or theater objectives, supporting or supported role.
Speaker 2: Oh, that's actually just the word, or yeah.
Speaker 1: They just recapitalized it. I don't know, that's weird.
Speaker 2: All right, Let's let's try that again. Executive military operations
Speaker 2: in supporting of national or theater objectives in supporting either
Speaker 2: a supporting or supported role. Operational phases within this plan
Speaker 2: maybe sequential, nonsequential, or modified depending on how global situation. However,
Speaker 2: given the global threat to humanity posed by zombies, once
Speaker 2: USS track Com issues orders to transform to transition to
Speaker 2: a specific phase of operations, that phase will apply to
Speaker 2: the entire globe.
Speaker 1: Okay, how dare they call it a globe?
Speaker 2: I had a feeling you were gonna go there, dude,
Speaker 2: Why not fucking globist?
Speaker 1: Dude?
Speaker 2: Well, you know, seeing as how that is the going narrative,
Speaker 2: and this is the Department of Defense's actual paperwork, so
Speaker 2: of course they would say it's a globe. You know. I,
Speaker 2: of course, being the resident globe tard, this makes sense
Speaker 2: to me. But of course we have to check the
Speaker 2: paperwork on it, dude, because who said it's a globe
Speaker 2: other than government officials and NASA. So I get it,
Speaker 2: I get it.
Speaker 1: I love that you call yourself a tard. You're really
Speaker 1: taking that on.
Speaker 2: Look, it is what it is. I'm gonna call a
Speaker 2: spade a spate. And if making me believing that we
Speaker 2: live on a sphere makes me some version of retarded,
Speaker 2: then I guess I'm just a little bit retauded, is
Speaker 2: what it is. I guess. So I guess.
Speaker 1: So so let's.
Speaker 2: Go and read the defensive ops Phase zero and that
Speaker 2: one kind of continues over here.
Speaker 1: Okay, so phase zero phase yeah? Uh so phase zero
Speaker 1: would be the shape. It says, conduct general zombie awareness training,
Speaker 1: ensure readiness of cb R and E protective equipment, and
Speaker 1: monitor vectors of zombie contamination contamination for increased threat phase
Speaker 1: one phase.
Speaker 2: If you can catch it at the zero phase, right,
Speaker 2: that's that's the goal, you know. But if you catch
Speaker 2: it at phase one, this is like what that looks like.
Speaker 2: So that if and when this time happens, and all right,
Speaker 2: what's the situation on the ground, you know what phase
Speaker 2: you're in based off of this criteria.
Speaker 1: So phase one would be to deter it says, zombies
Speaker 1: cannot be deterred themselves. Uh, conduct large scale training to
Speaker 1: demonstrate USS or us dratcom ability to survive and operate
Speaker 1: in a in a toxic slash contaminated environment. IoT D
Speaker 1: turn nations states from pursuing development or deployment of zombie
Speaker 1: and also creating pathogens, toxins or similar capabilities developed by
Speaker 1: nation states large corporations to terrorists slash criminal groups. So
Speaker 1: I didn't even think about that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, because what happens that these zombies are being done
Speaker 2: by terrorists. They're like releasing the pathogen to start zombie
Speaker 2: outbreaks around the world.
Speaker 1: I guess you would have to look at the zombie
Speaker 1: itself as a terrorist.
Speaker 2: At that point, they're saying that there is no rules
Speaker 2: of war about how to handle a zombie.
Speaker 1: Well. Phase two would be to seize the initiative, recall
Speaker 1: all US strat Com personnel to duty stations, begin fortification
Speaker 1: of USS or of all US strat Com operating locations,
Speaker 1: initiate distribution of CBR and E protection equipment, and activate
Speaker 1: COUP plans. And also you would want to place deployable
Speaker 1: command and control capabilities on alert. So that would be
Speaker 1: seizing the initiative.
Speaker 2: Now, I don't know that was coop plans or co
Speaker 2: op plans. I'm gonna be probably at first at first
Speaker 2: allowed you said COUP is in like a military coup,
Speaker 2: and I'm like, wait, wait, that's in this picture. I
Speaker 2: was like, well, okay, Coop, Coop.
Speaker 1: All right, all right, yeah that's co Op. My bad,
Speaker 1: I can't read co Op. You can't read or we're just.
Speaker 2: It's all good. I got your back, you got mine.
Speaker 2: That's what we're here for. Bro.
Speaker 1: Yes, yes, together, we make up one brain cell.
Speaker 2: Together, we make up almost a fully functional brain.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 2: That's what we do here.
Speaker 1: Phase three would be to dominate, says, lockdown all us
Speaker 1: track Com operating locations for thirty days, assume mission oriented
Speaker 1: protective posture or MOP to uh MOP two inside all workstations,
Speaker 1: and direct MOP four for all personnel who venture outside
Speaker 1: four to five positions.
Speaker 2: So MOP gear for anybody who doesn't know. Have you
Speaker 2: ever seen jar head?
Speaker 1: Yeah, oh yeah, you're doing me.
Speaker 2: Gear that they had to throw on in the field
Speaker 2: to play all that time, their gas mask and the
Speaker 2: little thing that's MOP four.
Speaker 1: EM okay yep, yeah.
Speaker 2: So MOMS two is a lesser version of that, probably
Speaker 2: face mask, gloves, things like that, like medical type gear.
Speaker 2: MOP four is basically, you might be walking into a
Speaker 2: radiation cloud, you might be walking into a chlorine gas cloud.
Speaker 2: We don't know something is in the air, and we
Speaker 2: need to protect your skin and the air you're breathing.
Speaker 1: Phase four would be to stabilize deploy recon teams after
Speaker 1: D plus thirty whatever thirty, okay, day thirty, to ascertain
Speaker 1: general safety of environment near US TRATCLM locations for human habitation,
Speaker 1: execute a counter zombie ISR plan to id hold out
Speaker 1: pockets of zombie resistance.
Speaker 2: So yeah, like what your boy was doing an I
Speaker 2: am legend he was finding these little holdouts of zombies
Speaker 2: that he could shine light on them in things.
Speaker 1: Phase five would be to restore civil authority. Deploy you
Speaker 1: strac com personnel to aid any surviving civil authorities in
Speaker 1: a disaster or in disaster zones. All right, and then
Speaker 1: they also give the offensive. So that's just the defensive,
Speaker 1: the offensive.
Speaker 2: Of Well, let's talk about defense real quick. What are
Speaker 2: your thoughts on this? So defense basically depending on which
Speaker 2: phase of you know, we start at, depends on what
Speaker 2: we do next. And as far as defending the home
Speaker 2: territory here, they're saying, depending on how bad it is,
Speaker 2: we may need to wear a certain protective gear. Depending
Speaker 2: on how bad it is we might need to, you know,
Speaker 2: get protective equipment out to the people. Like I said,
Speaker 2: there's no we need to see. What we need to
Speaker 2: do is survive and operate in a toxic and contaminated
Speaker 2: environment and deter Nation States from pursuing development or deploying
Speaker 2: of zombies. Right. If this happens, we're gonna have to
Speaker 2: figure out how to protect ourselves against this type of
Speaker 2: thing being done against us, all of these things. What
Speaker 2: is your thoughts on the defensive plan?
Speaker 1: I mean, I think it's pretty solid. That's probably what
Speaker 1: I would expect, if you know, the government to do
Speaker 1: in order to you know, defend against these kind of things.
Speaker 1: I mean, you're you're wanting to deter it and and
Speaker 1: you know kind of you do everything that you can
Speaker 1: in order to be able to defend yourself against it.
Speaker 1: I don't see a problem with that. I think it's
Speaker 1: pretty you know, hefty as far as operations go.
Speaker 2: I think it's comprehensive, you know what I mean. I
Speaker 2: think they actually took it seriously. Although they gave all
Speaker 2: the discovers it's just a joke for training, it sounds
Speaker 2: like they took it rather seriously.
Speaker 1: It's pretty in depth for sure, I like it, So.
Speaker 2: Now let's go ahead and read about that offense.
Speaker 1: So the offensive as far as shaping it. In phase
Speaker 1: phase zero, you would conduct normal combat operations training and
Speaker 1: ensure forces conduct annual hazmat and co opt training. So
Speaker 1: that's phase zero. Phase one, in order to deter it,
Speaker 1: it says, conduct large scale training to demonstrate US strac
Speaker 1: commability to decisively target and negate zombie creating pathogens, toxins,
Speaker 1: or similar capabilities developed by nation states. Large cooperations to
Speaker 1: terrorist slash criminal groups.
Speaker 2: Mm hmm, I like it. I like it right.
Speaker 1: Phase two would be seizing the initiative. It says, if necessary,
Speaker 1: begin limited scale military operations to negate zombie threat. Phase three.
Speaker 1: In dominating, you would issue orders for defensive forces to
Speaker 1: kill all non human life on site, and you would
Speaker 1: also initiate bomber and missile strikes against targeted sources of
Speaker 1: zombie infection zombie support infrastructure, using all available forces.
Speaker 2: I like it thus far?
Speaker 1: Hell yeah it thus far? Shoot them on site?
Speaker 2: Yeah, dude, non non human life clock clock, got it.
Speaker 1: Phase four, if you're trying to stabilize it, it says,
Speaker 1: target all main body, target all main body and hold
Speaker 1: out vectors of zombie influenced contagion, using all available military capabilities,
Speaker 1: and continue all actions from previous phase. And then finally
Speaker 1: you would have phase five restoring civil authority. It says
Speaker 1: reconstitute combat capabilities at what is that word? Offut White?
Speaker 1: Oh okay, these are places off it Whiteman, Vanderberg, AFBS,
Speaker 1: and Fort Meade prepared to redeploy the forces to attack
Speaker 1: surviving zombie holdouts.
Speaker 2: I like it a lot. I like it a lot. Bro,
Speaker 2: there's a pretty good offensive plan for if zombies were
Speaker 2: to become a thing.
Speaker 1: Hell yeah, Hell yeah. I would say this that there
Speaker 1: are definitely people who would be taken advantage of shooting
Speaker 1: on site if you see a zombie. So I just
Speaker 1: want to throw that out there, because there's going to
Speaker 1: be like somebody that you really don't that you really
Speaker 1: don't care for, somebody cuts you off in traffic. Oh,
Speaker 1: must have been a zombie. Let me take care of
Speaker 1: that problem.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I can see some old scores getting settled pretty
Speaker 2: quickly for that to happen. But again we're talking depending
Speaker 2: on the type of zombie, depending on the type of outbreak,
Speaker 2: depending on what's needed. So it's like depending on what happens.
Speaker 2: They had a phase of the operation ready to go.
Speaker 1: Did you ever get into The Walking Dead?
Speaker 2: I did for a while. I tried to stick into it,
Speaker 2: but it got repetitive to me. And I liked it
Speaker 2: because it was like a look at the social condition.
Speaker 2: At first, the zombies were like the thing that everybody
Speaker 2: had to work against to protect themselves. Then once it
Speaker 2: was understood that these are slow moving zombies that you
Speaker 2: could just stab in the head and it's not that
Speaker 2: hard and whatever, you gotta protect yourself. Cool. Cool, Then
Speaker 2: it became which human tribe was going to take over
Speaker 2: resources from the other human tribe. That's what I always
Speaker 2: liked about the show. The zombies themselves just kind of
Speaker 2: seemed to be more of a nuisance as time went
Speaker 2: on and ever an ever growing problem, just about a
Speaker 2: constant fear, but something that you can handle with some fences,
Speaker 2: you know. It then became more about resource grabbing and
Speaker 2: human life and the socioeconomic look at it all, and
Speaker 2: I enjoyed that. But then it got so repetitive to
Speaker 2: where it's like, y'all just keep finding some bigger, badder
Speaker 2: dude to fuck with or some bigger batter group or
Speaker 2: somebody who's even more hardcore in this than you are,
Speaker 2: even though you all got the exact same starting time
Speaker 2: as everybody else. It's not like this group's been survivaling
Speaker 2: out in the years for thirty years. They just got
Speaker 2: the same zombie outbreak that everybody else has. How are
Speaker 2: they so psychotic and this group is semi normal? It's
Speaker 2: like it got too much.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, and then Megan turned into a good guy
Speaker 1: and I was like, what do we forget that? He
Speaker 1: just took a baseball bat wrapped and barbired all your homies, Dude.
Speaker 2: Like, what is this? And so it was cool for
Speaker 2: a time, it lost its luster to me personally.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's one of the shows that my sister. Dude,
Speaker 1: My sister watches the same shows on repeat, Like she
Speaker 1: just cycles through like three shows and one of them
Speaker 1: is fucking walking dead on the other ones Gilmour Girls,
Speaker 1: which not gonna lie might sound a little gay, I
Speaker 1: kind of fuck with I like.
Speaker 2: Pretty Little Liars. That was my shoe until the fucking ending.
Speaker 2: I've still never forgiven them for that. That was a
Speaker 2: bullshit cop out ending. Bro Evil twin dun dunk dump, Like, bro,
Speaker 2: what kind of nineteen eighties soap opera are we watching
Speaker 2: right now? But yeah, it was just piss poor writing.
Speaker 1: I'm kind of judging you for watching that and being
Speaker 1: so into it.
Speaker 2: I mean, I didn't have a choice. The ex wife
Speaker 2: that I was with at the time, like wanted to
Speaker 2: rewatch it. We only have one TV, so like whatever, cool, cool,
Speaker 2: the plot was cool, the who done it was cool.
Speaker 2: It kept getting more and more interesting, just for them
Speaker 2: to throw it away literally within the last fifteen minutes
Speaker 2: of the series, and I'm like, wow, super fucking cool.
Speaker 1: Wait a second, what kind of third world country are
Speaker 1: you living in? Do you only have one TV in
Speaker 1: your house?
Speaker 2: Well, once upon a time when I was a young
Speaker 2: nineteen year old marine who was freshly married, and I
Speaker 2: lived in a one bedroom apartment with some Ikeia furniture
Speaker 2: and a flat screen TV that I'm not one hundred
Speaker 2: percent and didn't get beer bottles thrown through. At one point,
Speaker 2: we had only an Xbox and an airnet connection and
Speaker 2: that was like all we had.
Speaker 1: You know, hey, dude, I remember the struggle.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, that was That was some good times, but
Speaker 2: also some really bad times. Looking back on it, you
Speaker 2: know now, that is not a good thing to have
Speaker 2: in a young marriage.
Speaker 1: In my personal opinion, after a while, you just get
Speaker 1: burnt out on ramen and peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.
Speaker 2: Oh dude, I was. My kids just asked me the
Speaker 2: other day, like what the military makes, like military paychecks.
Speaker 2: I just pulled up the most recent twenty twenty four
Speaker 2: military paychecks for if you're starting in the middle, it's
Speaker 2: a fucking joke. It's like seven eight hundred dollars a month.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's you're not surviving on that, no, But like
Speaker 1: the way.
Speaker 2: That they offset that is because you don't have to
Speaker 2: find a place to live because you live in the barracks.
Speaker 2: You don't have to worry about food, you eat the
Speaker 2: chow haul. You don't have to worry about insurance. You
Speaker 2: go to medical any time you're sick or dental you
Speaker 2: just go make an appointment free of charge, and you just,
Speaker 2: you know what, do you have to spend money on
Speaker 2: other than yourself. So it's it's not like you're living big,
Speaker 2: but also you can do okay if you're smart.
Speaker 1: It was kind of that way whenever I was working
Speaker 1: offshore too. We didn't get paid shit, but we also
Speaker 1: got fed you know, we were housed and you know,
Speaker 1: you didn't have to worry about driving to work, so
Speaker 1: all those kind of offset it too.
Speaker 2: Actually, I'm not sure if it was like seven fifty
Speaker 2: a month or seven fifty every It might have been
Speaker 2: each paycheck on the first and the fifteenth, because that's
Speaker 2: when the military gets paid. But yeah, not a not
Speaker 2: a very smart financial move to join the military, but
Speaker 2: there's benefits later on.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you're not joining it initially for the money. Nobody
Speaker 1: does that.
Speaker 2: Oh my god. If you are, then man, you need
Speaker 2: to read a book.
Speaker 1: You need you can make more. Fucking Mickeyd's dude doing
Speaker 1: that now.
Speaker 2: All right, So now let's talk about the defensive support
Speaker 2: to civil authorities. So, like what would happen when the
Speaker 2: military finally restored order and tried to give it to
Speaker 2: the local PD and the local government officials. You know,
Speaker 2: so phase zero of that.
Speaker 1: Phase zero would be shaping the environment. US Stratcom will
Speaker 1: perform routine operations to include epidemiological surveillance to watch for
Speaker 1: changes in disease vectors that could cause zombieism. US stract
Speaker 1: COM Center for Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction is this
Speaker 1: coming from Saddam Hussein or what a who knows. They
Speaker 1: will serve as the lead component within the command or
Speaker 1: two ensure all Phase zero shaping operations are conducted and
Speaker 1: synchronized within with other federal, state, and tribal agencies. It
Speaker 1: will also ensure that necessary epidemiological epia demiological there we
Speaker 1: go ISR requirements are issued and answered by the intelligence community,
Speaker 1: and they will work with us us AMRID to ensure
Speaker 1: the risks of US stract Com forces are monitored and
Speaker 1: necessary and that necessary has MATT and CBR and E
Speaker 1: training is accomplished across the US Stratcom enterprise.
Speaker 2: That's Phase zero, okay, Phase zero, now Phase one to
Speaker 2: deter upon receipt you know, I'll just read on. Upon
Speaker 2: receipt of usstrack Com Warnard JFCCGS will become the supported
Speaker 2: commander of Phase one operations in this plant. It is
Speaker 2: important to note that zombies are not contingent life forms.
Speaker 2: As such, they cannot be deterred or reasoned with in
Speaker 2: any way.
Speaker 1: COGNI what I say, They're not cognizant life forms.
Speaker 2: Oh okay, cognizant life forms as such, they cannot be
Speaker 2: deterred or reasoned with in any way. However, they are
Speaker 2: zombie inducing forces that can be deterred from further action.
Speaker 2: These forces include, but are not limited to, Nation states,
Speaker 2: terrorist groups with WMD programs, unethical bio research companies. Now
Speaker 2: to meet deterrence goals, usstrack Com will conduct large scale
Speaker 2: training to demonstrate usstract COM's ability to survive and operate
Speaker 2: in a toxic contaminated environment IoT deter Nation States from
Speaker 2: pursuing a development of deployment or zombie creating pathogens, toxicens,
Speaker 2: or similar capabilities by developed by Nation states large corporations. Wait,
Speaker 2: do we already read that in the top one? Is
Speaker 2: this just more of a breakdown of it all?
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's it's kind of like getting more in depth
Speaker 1: as far as the offensive and the defensive.
Speaker 2: I think, okay, well, let's just go on to the
Speaker 2: next section here, just making sure we miss something critical
Speaker 2: Enable civil authorities now, yeah, we talked about that one too.
Speaker 2: All right, good things. Now, let's talk about some supporting plans.
Speaker 2: Due to the fact that an outbreak of zombieism will
Speaker 2: likely spread rapidly across CCMD ao R boundaries, uss trat
Speaker 2: Com has been tasked by the Secretary of Defense to
Speaker 2: develop a level three plan that can serve as a
Speaker 2: model for all other CCMD counter zombie dominance planning. Complan
Speaker 2: eight eight eight eight planning guide guidance from the Secretary
Speaker 2: Defense assumes a worst case scenario in which all normal
Speaker 2: C two capaities are impaired or overrun by zombie forces.
Speaker 2: As such, this plan relies heavily on hard and C
Speaker 2: two capabilities normally reserved for nuclear or full scale global
Speaker 2: convention warfare. Supporting combat commands and functional components will update
Speaker 2: all their contingency plans related to counter zombie operations using
Speaker 2: this plan. Okay, let's talk a little bit about their
Speaker 2: collateral plans.
Speaker 1: The following US track com plans may be implemented collaterally
Speaker 1: with Complan eighty eight eighty eight. So the first one
Speaker 1: would be space operations, the second one is pandemic influenza,
Speaker 1: the third one is combating weapons of mass destruction, the
Speaker 1: next one is deterrence and global strike, and the final one,
Speaker 1: I believe no not the final one. The next one
Speaker 1: omnibus Omnibus support plan. And then it also gets into
Speaker 1: the geographic Combatant Command that would be you know, supporting
Speaker 1: the omnibus support plan.
Speaker 2: So with that, if anybody would like to look up
Speaker 2: those plans on their own to see what Conplan eight
Speaker 2: eight eight eight, because that's just the joke, that's just
Speaker 2: for fun, that's just for training. Anybody will look that up.
Speaker 2: Go up, look up Conplan eighty thirty five. Go look
Speaker 2: up Conplan eighty five thirty one, Conplan eighty ninety nine,
Speaker 2: OP Plan eighty ten, and op Plan eight zero zero one.
Speaker 2: Those are for you. Please look those up. Google search
Speaker 2: those and if you have any questions if that's real
Speaker 2: or not. Once again, that is Department of Defense actual documentation.
Speaker 1: Right the assumption's part, it says US and allies will
Speaker 1: have the situational awareness necessary to conduct all counter zombie
Speaker 1: dominance operations. In this plan, zombie forces will become stronger
Speaker 1: with each human casualty, because each human casualty will become
Speaker 1: a zombie. US and Allied forces may be degraded as
Speaker 1: a conflict emerges and progresses. And then the LOAC will
Speaker 1: not apply to zombies. And also the domestic law enforcement agency.
Speaker 2: Local operation administrative component.
Speaker 1: Yeah, let's go with that. Uh, the domestic law enforcement
Speaker 1: agencies will address any KANU con US based attacks involving
Speaker 1: zombies until martial law is declared, and the next one
Speaker 1: says that there is no known medical cure for zombie
Speaker 1: for a zombie pathogen at this time, it can be
Speaker 1: assumed that once a human turns, they cannot be cured
Speaker 1: or reverted to human status. Seek out the nearest CDC
Speaker 1: for any hopes of medical breakthroughs during the time of
Speaker 1: a pandemic. I'm not taking a shot from the CDC.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you that.
Speaker 2: Got to rely on that CDC. You know what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: The only assumed way to effectively cause casualties to the
Speaker 1: zombie ranks by tactical by tactical force, is the concentration
Speaker 1: of all firepower to the head, specifically the brain. The
Speaker 1: human brain will still be functioning in the zombie state,
Speaker 1: but it is universally agreed that only that the only
Speaker 1: part actually active will be the brain stem. And then
Speaker 1: it says the only way to I'm sure zombie is
Speaker 1: quote unquote dead is to burn the zombie corps. Emzs
Speaker 1: are the only class of zombie that may not be
Speaker 1: vulnerable to this measure.
Speaker 2: Z We don't know if the evil magic zombies can
Speaker 2: be burned to death.
Speaker 1: We don't know that but maybe because they're alive in spirit, right,
Speaker 1: the Chaplain Corps may provide the only viable means of
Speaker 1: combating emzs. As such, atheists could be particularly vulnerable to
Speaker 1: EMZ threats.
Speaker 2: What I mean, look, if your spiritual house is not
Speaker 2: in order, evil magic zombies might have a particular taste
Speaker 2: for you. We don't know that yet.
Speaker 1: Damn the atheist or the first one to get fucked.
Speaker 2: I mean, look, who knows. It's saying that the Chaplain
Speaker 2: Corps may they may not, but they may be able
Speaker 2: to provide the only viable means of combating the evil
Speaker 2: magic zombies. If we don't know this yet.
Speaker 1: Though, well I guess so, because you know, the atheists
Speaker 1: wouldn't believe in a magic zombie, right.
Speaker 2: The evil magic zombie would be coming at them like
Speaker 2: full on occult magic dude rose from the grave, and
Speaker 2: atheists to be like, well, there's gotta be a scientific
Speaker 2: reason behind this, there's gotta be more, and then they'd
Speaker 2: be eaten. They've be eaten, yeah, because like, obviously this
Speaker 2: isn't an evil dead person coming at me. This is
Speaker 2: a costplayer. There's got to be a logical yeah, okay,
Speaker 2: and then they're dead, and.
Speaker 1: Those are the people that really really believe that science
Speaker 1: has got it all figured out and it's like crazy. Hm, dude,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, but uh, whatever created this realm, this world,
Speaker 1: this this fucking arcade game that we're living in was
Speaker 1: not created by us as humans. At least no.
Speaker 2: Show to fuck wasn't. But anyway, and again, we don't
Speaker 2: know if the chaplains can combat them, but it's possible.
Speaker 1: Well, because accurate intelligence related to zombies will be hard
Speaker 1: to obtain using traditional methods, planners will have to assume
Speaker 1: worst case scenarios derived from popular culture references i e. Books, movies,
Speaker 1: comic books to adequately model zombie threats. Yeah, so you'd
Speaker 1: have to go back to the movies in the books
Speaker 1: to understand how to kill them.
Speaker 2: Because you know, if we're going off of what we
Speaker 2: have to work with, we don't allegedly have things to
Speaker 2: work with, but somehow we have enough for them to
Speaker 2: have a whole categorization of them all whatever.
Speaker 1: Even if infected by a zombie contaminant or pathogen, human
Speaker 1: biology requires a regular intake of water and food absent
Speaker 1: proper hydration to offset the effects of progressing zombieism. Zombie
Speaker 1: infected humans will experience organ failure that will immobilize or
Speaker 1: kill the host within thirty to forty days.
Speaker 2: Allegedly, unless, of course, they're being animated by evil magic.
Speaker 2: We don't know.
Speaker 1: I don't think the evil animated zombies would require water
Speaker 1: to survive personally.
Speaker 2: I don't think so. But at the same time, I
Speaker 2: get like, on a scientific level, if a person was
Speaker 2: to become a zombie and they no longer drinking water
Speaker 2: or eating food, their body will deteriorate and fail. Eventually,
Speaker 2: their brain will no longer be able to move the
Speaker 2: body because it won't have any calories too, you know
Speaker 2: what I'm saying. It's like, I get where they're trying
Speaker 2: to go with this, but that only applies to certain
Speaker 2: types of zombieism.
Speaker 1: Right right. I mean, if you're if your body is
Speaker 1: taken over by a parasite, the parasite is going to
Speaker 1: feed off of your body, and eventually he does. Eventually
Speaker 1: the water in your body will, will, you know, go away.
Speaker 1: But you're talking about a parasite, something the size of
Speaker 1: like a fingernail clipping at best, And it's like, yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't know how much water that that little parasite requires.
Speaker 1: To stay alive, you know, and in reference to the
Speaker 1: amount of water that's already within our body that it
Speaker 1: has to feed off of, So I would say probably
Speaker 1: longer than thirty to forty days, you might get like
Speaker 1: six months to a year out of the body.
Speaker 2: I mean, who knows, dude, the organs are not going
Speaker 2: to be operating, well, maybe they will. Is the heart
Speaker 2: going to be beating or is it a dead person
Speaker 2: that is now walking away which organs are not operating? Right?
Speaker 2: How much water is the body actually using? Is the
Speaker 2: body still sweating? Does core temperature regulation even matter anymore? Like,
Speaker 2: there's so many questions unanswered. So again, this is just
Speaker 2: going off of what they allegedly believe when they wrote this.
Speaker 1: Plant marketing materials for most hand sanitizer products indicate that
Speaker 1: the products killed ninety nine percent of all germs. Although
Speaker 1: none of these products has ever indicated any efficacy against
Speaker 1: biohazard level four pathogens like ebola, it is entirely possible
Speaker 1: that such products could limit or delay the spread of
Speaker 1: the passage pathogen based zombieism if properly employed.
Speaker 2: So I didn't know lysaw doesn't kill ebola. I know
Speaker 2: it kills COVID but I kind of thought it killed
Speaker 2: Ebola too.
Speaker 1: I mean, I don't buy any of that bullshit personally,
Speaker 1: but anyway, it says zombies are under dead and thus
Speaker 1: feel no pain or fear of death. Riot control countermeasures
Speaker 1: would be completely ineffective.
Speaker 2: Agreed.
Speaker 1: And also the human instinct for self preservation can cause
Speaker 1: newly infected zombie hosts to deny their imminent zombification to
Speaker 1: nearby humans. Okay, so basically running away.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: The operational limits. It says. The operational limitations consist of
Speaker 1: actions or conditions the us stract Com and its supporting
Speaker 1: forces must take to ensure constraints and those actions of
Speaker 1: condiction of conditions that us stract com and its supporting
Speaker 1: forces must not allow to or must must not take
Speaker 1: allow to happen. This is written very weird.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's very very official.
Speaker 1: Other limitations contained in this section pertain to resource or
Speaker 1: procedural shortfalls that planners must consider, which could undermine us
Speaker 1: stract Comm's ability to achieve the missions outline in this plan. Okay,
Speaker 1: so you have the limitations, then you have the constraints, restraints, shortfalls,
Speaker 1: and limiting factors.
Speaker 2: I think that could be kind of interesting. The shortfalls
Speaker 2: and limiting factors.
Speaker 1: It says, adequate zombie defenses require sandbags, sand barbed wire,
Speaker 1: anti personnel minds, riot control chemical agents, mop gear, and
Speaker 1: petroleum to create flame barriers. These supplies may not be
Speaker 1: present in sufficient volume to allow desired levels of defense
Speaker 1: against zombie incursion and could severely tax available logistical support infrastructure.
Speaker 2: The US TRAE Wait a minute, why are they saying
Speaker 2: riot control chemical agents when literally the paragraph before that
Speaker 2: they said riot control measures would be completely ineffective.
Speaker 1: Well, it was for the I don't know. I think
Speaker 1: it's getting into specific types. Maybe there are certain types
Speaker 1: that would be able to be corralled as far as
Speaker 1: like riot control goes.
Speaker 2: It says, right here, zombies are undead and thus feel noe,
Speaker 2: pain or fear of death, riot control countermeasures would be
Speaker 2: completely ineffective. Then we go to this very next one
Speaker 2: and it's just kind of listing all the stuff, and it,
Speaker 2: like you said, we don't know what type of zombies.
Speaker 2: Maybe they do have feeling of some type, Maybe they
Speaker 2: feel pain. Maybe fire would be the effect against them,
Speaker 2: maybe it wouldn't. Maybe barbed wire would do nothing. Who knows.
Speaker 1: Okay, well, you had just thrown everything out of it
Speaker 1: to see what sticks. I feel like you'd want to
Speaker 1: corral them. That way, you'd be able to bomb a
Speaker 1: shitload of them at one time. So maybe you'd be
Speaker 1: able to herd them like cattle.
Speaker 2: That could be a viable option. I could see that.
Speaker 1: US Stratcon forces do not currently hold enough contingency stores
Speaker 1: for food and water to support thirty days of barricaded
Speaker 1: counter zombie operations. I think that would be an issue.
Speaker 1: US strat Com has no ground combat forces capable of
Speaker 1: repelling a zombie assault and also can only deliver synchronized
Speaker 1: fires against a zombie threat via strategic air space and
Speaker 1: maritime forces. Okay, wow, as if that's not enough, right, AFB,
Speaker 1: what is that air force base? Air Force bases provide.
Speaker 2: Off foot air air Force Base off is the name
Speaker 2: of the place? Oh?
Speaker 1: Okay, so that specific air force base provides the only
Speaker 1: semi hardened location capable of sheltering personnel responsible for commanding
Speaker 1: and controlling a coordinated combat action against zombie forces. JFCC
Speaker 1: Space and US Cybercom Operations operation centers are located within
Speaker 1: protected military facilities. However, zombie forces will likely overrun those
Speaker 1: installations within the first days of a zombie invasion. Okay,
Speaker 1: you kind of fucked there.
Speaker 2: Too, depending on what kind of wave we're looking at here, the.
Speaker 1: US strat Com Component level continuity or Continuity of Operations
Speaker 1: plans or coup ah there we go do not currently
Speaker 1: address zombie threats. Further, since component coops utilize facilities provided
Speaker 1: by other US Trackcom components or another or non hardened
Speaker 1: temporary facilities, zombie threats will likely render coops ineffective. Coops
Speaker 1: should be revised to include in extremist carpentry, welding and lumber,
Speaker 1: stockpiling and training, and metal work in order to facilitate
Speaker 1: shelter and place ops and barricading of unhardened facilities against zombies.
Speaker 2: I agree with that a basic carpentry class and a
Speaker 2: basic welding class to kind of teach you how to
Speaker 2: strengthen certain barriers and fortifications.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, yeah, those those kind of lessons would be pretty
Speaker 1: important if you're trying to survive.
Speaker 2: I think so.
Speaker 1: Airborne command centers are unlikely to be viable after the
Speaker 1: first week of a zombie invasion, although refueling in air
Speaker 1: will extend mission capabilities. The support bases that refuelers operate
Speaker 1: from will likely be overrun by zombies. It is possible
Speaker 1: that islands like Hawaii, Guam and Diego Garcia. Oh, Diego Garcia.
Speaker 1: Remember we talked about that before might remain viable relocation
Speaker 1: bases if airborne C two assets can make it to
Speaker 1: these locations. So okay, well, yeah, you'd want to go
Speaker 1: to the islands. Yeah, that would be smart. I mean,
Speaker 1: surrounded by all the water and everything, that'd be the
Speaker 1: smart way. So now we get into the command relationships.
Speaker 1: It says command relationships the US strat Com forces may
Speaker 1: be fixed or deployed and may support theater and or
Speaker 1: national objectives simultaneously. The US track Com exercises CoCom over
Speaker 1: assigned forces and utilizes support relationships to support other commands.
Speaker 1: US track Com will tailor command relations to best match
Speaker 1: the situation, taking into account the global perspective and other
Speaker 1: ongoing space missions. Therefore, there is no quote unquote one
Speaker 1: size fits all for counter zombie operations command relationships. And
Speaker 1: then it says that it has a CoCom of all
Speaker 1: forces as assigned in the forces for unified command sections
Speaker 1: for the sect DEFs Global Force Management Implementation Guidance, The
Speaker 1: commanders of the US track com sub unified commands and
Speaker 1: components normally retain opcom of fixed and deployed forces. These
Speaker 1: command relationships will be utilizing during counter zombie operations unless
Speaker 1: otherwise directed by Secretary of Defense.
Speaker 2: So then they get into the logistics appraisal and they
Speaker 2: basically just show that they have this on nothing's actually
Speaker 2: filled out on it, but they show you that they
Speaker 2: have a spreadsheet where they have an account for everything.
Speaker 2: Everything has a you know, a slot for it, so
Speaker 2: it would be accounted for when and if that time
Speaker 2: ever came.
Speaker 1: Okay, yeah, all right, Well, I mean it seems to
Speaker 1: be a pretty in depth conversation here. I mean I
Speaker 1: like that they go in depth, but also makes me
Speaker 1: a little weary as to why this is something that
Speaker 1: they were kind of I mean, I get it, maybe
Speaker 1: it's kind of some kind of just a quote unquote
Speaker 1: operation to be prepared for as as a way of
Speaker 1: training you know up and comers in you know, strategic
Speaker 1: military understanding and stuff like that. But it is pretty
Speaker 1: interesting how in depth they go with all of it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so you know, let's pick it back up over
Speaker 2: here with the situation and we'll go from there. And
Speaker 2: they talk a little bit about some more useful information here,
Speaker 2: It says general, although there are no specific contingency planning
Speaker 2: guidance within the Chairman's Guidance for Employment of Force directing
Speaker 2: the creation of a counter zombie dominance plan, there is
Speaker 2: ample specified guidance for the creation of a Level three
Speaker 2: plans to provide defense support to civil authorities, homeland defense,
Speaker 2: counter weapons of mass destruction, and pandemic influenza. In light
Speaker 2: of the inherent survival threat posed by zombies, an absence
Speaker 2: specified guidance for detailed planning to address such a contingent,
Speaker 2: US trat Com has taken the initiative to develop a
Speaker 2: joke Level three plan consistent with guidance derived from other
Speaker 2: specified planning of efforts to ensure US and allied freedom
Speaker 2: of action from zombie domination. As a result, many specified
Speaker 2: tasks documented in this plan are taken from high level
Speaker 2: strategic guidance documents. Other tasks in the plan derived from
Speaker 2: these higher level tasks, or essential or essential for their
Speaker 2: accomplishment are listed as implied tasks. In cases where us
Speaker 2: trat Com has determined which tasks are essential task based
Speaker 2: on mission analysis, unless higher level guidance already specified in
Speaker 2: the task is essential. Science provides almost no useful data
Speaker 2: about zombies, although this presents a number of challenges with
Speaker 2: the military planning design operations to counter zombies. This plan
Speaker 2: utilizes data provided by science fiction sources in addition to
Speaker 2: what little academic slash scientific information is currently available. The
Speaker 2: use of science fiction sources does provide a compelling advantage
Speaker 2: for military planners. However, in almost all cases, science fiction
Speaker 2: scenarios significantly enhance planners with regards to the development Oh
Speaker 2: excuse me, science fiction scenarios significantly enhance analysis of courses
Speaker 2: of action, facilitate CoA warning and adjustment, and provide insight
Speaker 2: for planners with regards to the development of facts, assumptions, risks,
Speaker 2: and aversions of groupthink or cognitive bias. In short, the
Speaker 2: more robust of science fiction scenario related to the zombies,
Speaker 2: the more useful it is for planning purposes regarding regardless
Speaker 2: of how outlandish it might be. I thought that was
Speaker 2: an interesting paragraph as well.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, obviously, like it's going to sound outlandish if
Speaker 1: there is a zombie outbreak, but it's not out of
Speaker 1: the realm of possibility.
Speaker 2: So now let's talk about their execution. Bro, they got
Speaker 2: a mission statement, commander's intent, area of concern, flexible deterrent options,
Speaker 2: enemy forces. This is where we get to the meat
Speaker 2: and potatoes of a dog.
Speaker 1: Execution of this plan requires US Strapcom x SWORD activation
Speaker 1: or preparation to carry out operations detailed within this plan,
Speaker 1: including but not limited to, changing phases, changing zombie cons
Speaker 1: or terminating operations, will require US Stratcom alert toward At
Speaker 1: a minimum, the mission statement is on order CDUs strac
Speaker 1: Com will execute global military operations to protect humankind from
Speaker 1: zombies and, if directed, eradicate zombie threats to human safety
Speaker 1: and aid civil authorities in maintaining law and order and
Speaker 1: restoring basic services during and after a zombie attack. The
Speaker 1: commander's intent would be that the US stract Com will
Speaker 1: conduct military operations unilaterally or in conjunction with allies to
Speaker 1: preserve the collective security of humankind, and then the method
Speaker 1: would be that they would utilize assigned and attached military
Speaker 1: forces to maintain highly or to maintain timely and accurate
Speaker 1: warning of zombie threats, target zombie safe havens, eliminate sources
Speaker 1: of zombieism, and provide aid to civil authorities in their
Speaker 1: efforts to protect civilians. From zombie threats. They then it
Speaker 1: gets to end state the sources of zombieism are eradicated,
Speaker 1: zombie forces are precluded from massing and threatening human population centers,
Speaker 1: and potential adversaries are deterred from developing zombie weaponization programs.
Speaker 2: Oh shit, Okay, the areas of if we talk about
Speaker 2: areas of concern are also considered AO are areas of responsibility. Right,
Speaker 2: and it says that as combat commander it is not
Speaker 2: assigned an area of responsibility for normal operations and will
Speaker 2: not exercise those functions of command associated with geographic areas
Speaker 2: of responsibility. Although USS trat Com will has no geographic
Speaker 2: air of responsibility and has no specified combat roles against zombies,
Speaker 2: he is the only CDCDR in control of nuclear weapons,
Speaker 2: which are likely the most effective weapons against hordes of undead.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna say that last one again. Although see usstract
Speaker 2: Com has no geographic are responsibility and has no specified
Speaker 2: combat role against zombies, he being I believe the president,
Speaker 2: the combat commander or combatant commander, is the only one
Speaker 2: in control of nuclear weapons, which are likely to be
Speaker 2: the most effective weapons against hordes of the undead. US
Speaker 2: stract COM serves as the single point of contract for
Speaker 2: all global deterrents, global strike, military, space and cyber operations
Speaker 2: as directed by the Presidents of the United States, the
Speaker 2: Secretary of Defense for the protection of the US government,
Speaker 2: and those civilian, commercial, and allied capabilities augmented in the
Speaker 2: USG areas of interest AOI, you need terrestrial, atmospheric or
Speaker 2: exo atmospheric location where a source of zombieism or massed
Speaker 2: zombie forces are currently positioned, Okay, and then they get
Speaker 2: into the joint operations of it all, which I think
Speaker 2: kind of speaks for itself. Flexible detern Options FDOS applicable
Speaker 2: only for nation states of evil magicians who are capable
Speaker 2: of creating weaponized zombies or evil magic zombies. Refer to
Speaker 2: ANNEXC for additional details. So flexible detern options are only
Speaker 2: for countries where they might be doing evil things.
Speaker 1: The evil magicians, I think at that point you would
Speaker 1: have to learn a little bit of magic in order
Speaker 1: to deter magic. You need the good magic to deter
Speaker 1: the bad magic. Because killing the zombie that is incorporated
Speaker 1: with a magical soul, so to say, an evil magical soul,
Speaker 1: it can only be combated with good magic.
Speaker 2: I think I personally think that the government has magicians
Speaker 2: on the payroll. They may be using them for Satanic
Speaker 2: ritual practices. But I think that if this was to happen,
Speaker 2: I think they'd probably try to employ their guys they
Speaker 2: already have saved in their phone. You know what I mean.
Speaker 2: I could be wrong.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's no reason not too. I mean, you
Speaker 1: brought in all the boys from Operation paper Clip. I'm
Speaker 1: sure that some of them were involved in some of
Speaker 1: Hitler's magic.
Speaker 2: Oh that the call of duty. Remember Nazi zombies that
Speaker 2: was founded from the concept of Hitler's a cult magic
Speaker 2: and his crazy science, making Nazi zombies an unstoppable army.
Speaker 2: Who's to say that some of them didn't come with
Speaker 2: some prior knowledge of a cult magic. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Well, the Enemy Forces it says.
Speaker 2: I do love this woner here though. It says zombies cannot.
Speaker 1: Be deterred, just flat out yeah, why would they be so?
Speaker 1: The Enemy Forces it says there are eight classes of
Speaker 1: zombies addressed within this plan. Chicken zombies pose no threat
Speaker 1: to humans, and actions to counter the chicken zombies are
Speaker 1: the responsibilities of the US Departments of Justice.
Speaker 2: Okay, yeah, the chick zombies that's what we're worried about.
Speaker 1: Interesting, Yeah, it continued.
Speaker 2: It said the local law enforcement, Homeland security, agriculture, and
Speaker 2: Food and Drug Administration.
Speaker 1: The zombie threat classes are pathogenic zombies, radiation zombies, evil
Speaker 1: magic zombies, space zombies, weaponized zombies, symbian induced zombies, and
Speaker 1: vegetation zombies. Of the eight classes of zombies, four are
Speaker 1: caused by quote unquote natural phenomena that can be reliably
Speaker 1: monitored and predicted. Zombies caused by natural phenomenon would be
Speaker 1: the PZ, which would be the pathogenic, the RZ, which
Speaker 1: is radiation, the SZ, which is space zombies, and the
Speaker 1: si Z, which would be the symbian induced zombies. So
Speaker 1: those are the four quote unquote natural phenomena ones.
Speaker 2: I love how space zombies are listed as something that
Speaker 2: might be considered natural, because like if the media comes
Speaker 2: down in the radiation from it causes it, that was
Speaker 2: like from nature. They literally I'm just saying they're basically
Speaker 2: zombies are natural.
Speaker 1: Dog, Yeah, they're excellent. I Mean there's eight types and
Speaker 1: four of them are are natural something that would just
Speaker 1: happen on their own. So your evil magic zombies are unnatural. Yeah,
Speaker 1: at that point what the fuck is natural anymore?
Speaker 2: Do you see what I'm saying?
Speaker 4: Dude?
Speaker 2: Where are we drawing that line? But at the same time,
Speaker 2: they had to draw it somewhere, I guess, all right.
Speaker 1: The RZ which would be the radiation zombies, can also
Speaker 1: be caused by man made phenomena. One of the eight
Speaker 1: classes of zombies. Two are caused by man made of
Speaker 1: engineered phenomena that can be reliably monitored and predicted. Zombies
Speaker 1: caused by man made phenomena are the radiation zombies and
Speaker 1: the weaponized zombies. The radiation zombies can also be caused
Speaker 1: by natural phenomena. Of the eight classes of zombies, one
Speaker 1: type is caused by occult phenomena that can can not
Speaker 1: be reliably monitored, predicted, or proven to exist zombies, they
Speaker 1: may or may not exist. We're not sure.
Speaker 2: These other ones from natural a we don't know. But
Speaker 2: these magic ones, look, we really don't know.
Speaker 1: Zombies caused by occult phenomena are emz which are space zombies.
Speaker 1: The ones that are space zombies that are created via
Speaker 1: space but are also evil magic. Damn, that's a double whammy.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean, what if it's an occult astrologer who
Speaker 2: brought in the medior to cause the crazy zombie outbreak.
Speaker 2: That's both magic and astrological. Astrological space zombie, you know
Speaker 2: what I mean.
Speaker 1: Based on most science fiction sources, evil magic zombies, despite
Speaker 1: being the hardest threats to eliminate directly by attacking the
Speaker 1: zombie life form, can usually be eliminated if the source
Speaker 1: of evil magic is destroyed. There is there is evidence
Speaker 1: that the chaplain core may prove integral to counter these threats.
Speaker 1: So we gotta get the pre saw them, dude, we do.
Speaker 2: We do the priests and the preachers because the chaplain
Speaker 2: corp isn't just Catholic, it's all religions. So we got
Speaker 2: the Muslim he moms in that, we got the gurus
Speaker 2: in that, we got all of it. Any kind of
Speaker 2: religious figure that's serving in the military is a part
Speaker 2: of the chaplain course.
Speaker 1: We've thrown all the spirituality at it. We got to
Speaker 1: exercise this evil magic. Got to interesting, it says of
Speaker 1: the eight classes of zombies, one type is created by
Speaker 1: undermined phenomena. Zombies caused by natural phenomena are the VZ
Speaker 1: which would be the vegetarian little bitches. This class of
Speaker 1: zombie has been documented in the popular video game Plans
Speaker 1: Versus Zombies and the movie Signs with Mel Gibson. No
Speaker 1: current examples of this zombie class has ever been captured
Speaker 1: or examined by scientists. Were the Yeah, were the aliens?
Speaker 1: And signs vegetarian?
Speaker 2: I didn't know that. Is that what they were doing
Speaker 2: with the crop circles they were eating in that pattern?
Speaker 1: Is that what's understood. I didn't get at I sure
Speaker 1: the hell didn't.
Speaker 2: But I just remember that water killed them, and I
Speaker 2: thought it was crazy that they would land on a
Speaker 2: planet that's, you know, seventy to eighty percent water. But like,
Speaker 2: I just kind of left it alone.
Speaker 1: For planning purposes, the worst case threat scenario for this
Speaker 1: con plan is the emergence of a zombie phenomena high transmissibility,
Speaker 1: high attack rates, high virulence, little or no immunity, and
Speaker 1: limited effective countermeasures, only susceptible to destruction of the brain stem.
Speaker 1: This event would produce a situation in which DoD would
Speaker 1: experience significant negative impacts on readiness. For an example, personal
Speaker 1: availability training, unit manning, equipping, and deploying the force while
Speaker 1: being simultaneously directed to provide substantial support to civil authorities
Speaker 1: and deter and or respond to opportunistic adversarial aggression. The
Speaker 1: primary characteristics of a highly threatening zombie phenomena are the
Speaker 1: pathogen's ability to invade host without being observed, the like
Speaker 1: if you had like a bite or another visible wound,
Speaker 1: not being required. The ability to successfully reproduce within a
Speaker 1: within a host, whether it be a human, animal, or plant.
Speaker 1: Its ability to exploit abundant natural hosts or vectors not
Speaker 1: just limited to humans, but able to spread among hosts
Speaker 1: of animals or even plants. A potential to mutate quickly,
Speaker 1: mitigating our ability to develop a vaccine or cure. I
Speaker 1: have a feeling that they already have a vaccine for this,
Speaker 1: because why the fuck wouldn't they.
Speaker 2: You know, they already had a vaccine for COVID ready
Speaker 2: to go before we had ever We had never seen
Speaker 2: anything like it, even though we had a vaccine.
Speaker 1: It was crazy and high transmissibility, resulting in large numbers
Speaker 1: of people becoming sick or absent simultaneously, or entire herds, flocks,
Speaker 1: or crops being infected or contaminated. A second order effect
Speaker 1: of zombie phenomena of operational significance is the potential for political,
Speaker 1: social and or economic instability, and or degradation of allied
Speaker 1: military readiness. While adversarial forces or resources may also be infected,
Speaker 1: their readiness, operational capability, or domestic stability may not be
Speaker 1: impacted in the same manner, to the same degree or
Speaker 1: at the same time as US and allied forces. The
Speaker 1: degree to which countries and regions can mitigate morbidity, mortality,
Speaker 1: and associated effects during the zombie phenomena event and reintegrate
Speaker 1: recovering if possible, individuals and agricultural systems into society will
Speaker 1: have a considerable into impact on military force capabilities. Countries
Speaker 1: with more advanced, prepared and robust health care and agricultural
Speaker 1: systems will be better able to mitigate many of the
Speaker 1: zombie phenomena effects.
Speaker 2: If that makes sense to me, a first world country
Speaker 2: would be better off from a zombie outbreak than a
Speaker 2: third world country. I think that's kind of understood to
Speaker 2: be true. That's fair.
Speaker 1: Key security concerns it would arise from a zombie phenomena
Speaker 1: event of operational significance include opportunistic aggression, opportunities for violent
Speaker 1: extremists to acquire weapons of mass destruction during reduced security capabilities,
Speaker 1: reduce partner capacity during and after a zombie phenomena, instability
Speaker 1: resulting from humanitarian disaster and decreased production and distribution of
Speaker 1: essential commodities. The prevalance of a zombie phenomena coupled with political, social,
Speaker 1: and economic instability may result in reduced security capabilities, providing
Speaker 1: an opportunity for international military conflict, increased terrorist activity, internal unrest,
Speaker 1: political and or economic collapse, humanitarian crisis is and dramatic
Speaker 1: civil unrest.
Speaker 2: YO for a worldwide phenomena, A breakout like that, not
Speaker 2: something that allegedly six feet in a cloth mask could
Speaker 2: save you from right allegedly if it's sound like this,
Speaker 2: where it's like an active, aggressive thing that is like
Speaker 2: coming to get you, I mean the security concerns of that,
Speaker 2: the collapse of that, What countries would take advantage of
Speaker 2: that chaos to suit their means? I mean, the list
Speaker 2: goes on and on. Who knows well.
Speaker 1: Then it gets into the enemy center of gravity or COG.
Speaker 1: Once a zombie phenomena is capable of efficient, effective and
Speaker 1: sustained transmission, it's COG or the center of gravity will
Speaker 1: be the geographic speed at which it can spread attack
Speaker 1: rate within the host population and the virulence of zombie phenomena.
Speaker 1: A zombie phenomena will produce cascading effects due to the
Speaker 1: large number of simultaneous absences over extended periods of time,
Speaker 1: or loss of significant critical infrastructure slash key resources for example,
Speaker 1: agricultural resources on a national, regional, or international scale.
Speaker 2: Absolutely then true if you don't have the farmers to
Speaker 2: work the fields, or like they said, how do you
Speaker 2: know that it's not something that can be transferred to
Speaker 2: plants or animals? Could be? Could be?
Speaker 3: So?
Speaker 1: The critical capabilities the ability to efficiently and effectively reproduce
Speaker 1: within a host, mute quickly, and transmit from host to
Speaker 1: hosts are key requisites for the realization of a worst
Speaker 1: case zombie phenomena scenario. The degree of transmissibility depends on
Speaker 1: a number of key factors such as pathogen mutation, transmissibility
Speaker 1: of a new strain among hosts or vectors, proximity and
Speaker 1: behavior of host or vectors, survivability outside of a host,
Speaker 1: and availability and effectiveness of countermeasures. And then finally it
Speaker 1: gets into the critical requirements. A critical requirement of the
Speaker 1: zombie phenomena is the ability to mutate and propagate among
Speaker 1: and between hosts efficient Transmission can occur in a number
Speaker 1: of ways, including respiratory slash, airborne spread, direct contact, food
Speaker 1: and water contamination, biological vectors whether it be mosquitos, sand flies,
Speaker 1: and tips, and via fomites which would come from doorknobs, desktops,
Speaker 1: vehicle and machinery, where the disease can potentially survive for
Speaker 1: hours or days. Effectively, wait what was it?
Speaker 2: Additionally?
Speaker 4: Oh?
Speaker 1: Okay? Additionally, disease impacts severe enough to incapacitate or render
Speaker 1: unusable large numbers of hosts will likely generate additional psychological
Speaker 1: impacts among a population, absenteeism due to fear and panic, hoarding,
Speaker 1: and trade restrictions. Furthermore, the infected hosts must survive long
Speaker 1: enough to shed disease agent in sufficient quality to infect
Speaker 1: or insufficient quantity to infect others. Because zombies do not
Speaker 1: expire naturally, as is the case with humans suffering from
Speaker 1: other diseases, there is no inherent break on the spread
Speaker 1: of the disease. Finally, the disease requires susceptible populations, which
Speaker 1: include those that are immunal, looged, naive, and inadequately trained
Speaker 1: on preventative, environmental or occupational health measures. And then the vulnerabilities,
Speaker 1: which would be the disease agent cannot infect and an
Speaker 1: immunologically protected host such as a capability BETH should such
Speaker 1: a capability be developed and is susceptible to. Non pharmaceutical
Speaker 1: intervention measures various forms of environmental dysfection or disinfection, control vector,
Speaker 1: development of effective immune response by vaccine or natural infection,
Speaker 1: and pharmaceutical prophylaxis or treatment. Non pharmaceutical interventions include targeted,
Speaker 1: layered containment, non exposure, hand washing, disinfection, isolation, slash, quarantine, culling, equipment, sanitation,
Speaker 1: et cetera, which can impede transmission. Culling yeah, oh yeah, yeah, dude,
Speaker 1: to cull the herd means to lessen the population of
Speaker 1: so yeah.
Speaker 2: The fact that that was even just brought up, oh
Speaker 2: so nonchalantly in the middle of that isolation and quarantine, calling, equipment, sanitation,
Speaker 2: et cetera. Bro what it was in the same line
Speaker 2: as non exposure, hand washing, disinfect These things were brought
Speaker 2: up at the same time as calling the population.
Speaker 1: I wonder if calling the population just means like individually
Speaker 1: picking out or picking off said zombies.
Speaker 2: I would hope that would be the intent on that
Speaker 2: but again I don't really know. Now Here it gets
Speaker 2: into the next section is talking about friendly forces. Friendly forces,
Speaker 2: it says to refer to a different area, uh, decisive
Speaker 2: points or centers of gravity for the cogs. Okay, Now
Speaker 2: it says zombie forces can be expected to center their
Speaker 2: efforts against the following centers of gravity, human population centers,
Speaker 2: lines of communication, podible water sources. Okay, Now those are
Speaker 2: kind of important things here, whether zombies are cognizant enough
Speaker 2: to attack lines of communication or to poison our water supply.
Speaker 2: Even if a person with zombieism falls into a well
Speaker 2: or into a river or into something, that's it. The
Speaker 2: water source is contaminated, we can't use it. Lines of communication,
Speaker 2: any kind of a frying of an electrical grid boom,
Speaker 2: Now that's gone, you know it's and that could be
Speaker 2: done accidentally by a zombie wandering into an electrical panel
Speaker 2: that it shouldn't. It could be done but from anything.
Speaker 1: Right right, Well, Look, I mean, I'm sure this FOYA
Speaker 1: article goes on and on and on forever, and there's
Speaker 1: probably a shitload of different preventative measures that they would
Speaker 1: be taking. But you know, if this is something that
Speaker 1: you want to look into a little bit more. It
Speaker 1: is available for the public if you want to be
Speaker 1: able to read it on your own, whether you want
Speaker 1: to call it you know, just yeah, it's all fun,
Speaker 1: and it was something that was just meant to, you know, basically,
Speaker 1: train the military people how to make a plan for
Speaker 1: something crazy like that, or maybe it's something real, or
Speaker 1: maybe it's something that they could be planning towards in
Speaker 1: the future. But I think we have a couple of
Speaker 1: videos before we get there too.
Speaker 2: No, no, no, we do, in fact, Jonathan, and on
Speaker 2: the same track that you are currently on, sir. So look,
Speaker 2: we got the zombie Contingency Plan conplan eight eight eight eight,
Speaker 2: and people could look into it all they want. We're
Speaker 2: not going to read the entirety of we could. We could,
Speaker 2: but I honestly think we read pretty much the good
Speaker 2: meat and potatoes of it all. They don't have a
Speaker 2: lot as to how the evil magic zombies came into existence.
Speaker 2: It's more like from the government standpoint, Okay, we have
Speaker 2: this type of situation, how do we fight it. They're
Speaker 2: not worried about the house and the whys at that time.
Speaker 2: It's more about securing the house, if you will, and
Speaker 2: with all of that being released only a few years ago.
Speaker 2: Because of that Freedom of Information Act request, we now
Speaker 2: see that only two years ago. Actually, let me see
Speaker 2: if it was. I want to see when this was posted.
Speaker 2: I want to say it was two years ago, one
Speaker 2: year ago. Excuse me. This is a Wion climate tracker,
Speaker 2: and apparently they found a forty eight thousand year old
Speaker 2: zombie virus in the permafrost. Jonathan, As we're talking about
Speaker 2: what might happen if a zombie outbreak was to happen,
Speaker 2: they just happened to be finding shit. Let's hear about it.
Speaker 6: Oh, witness the horrors of what one virus can do.
Speaker 6: The coronavirus brought the entire world to a grinding halt,
Speaker 6: and it took massive containment measures on a global scale.
Speaker 6: Vaccines were developed rapidly to hauld the spread of the virus.
Speaker 6: That was just one virus at its peak. Also, its
Speaker 6: fatality rate was not more than four percent. And now
Speaker 6: what would happen if the world comes face to face
Speaker 6: with an even deadlier strain often.
Speaker 2: Real quick COVID at its worst had a mortality rate
Speaker 2: of only four percent. It is not what the media
Speaker 2: told us. In hell, even if you Look at what
Speaker 2: the new says now they say it wasn't that bullshit?
Speaker 2: Four percent at its peak?
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, they always fluff the numbers. Look at the
Speaker 1: fucking poles.
Speaker 2: You know. Yeah, I'm just saying, hindsight's twenty twenty on this,
Speaker 2: and this is the Indian news source, and they're saying
Speaker 2: that COVID worldwide only had a death rate of four percent.
Speaker 2: Real shit? And how much of those numbers were actually
Speaker 2: real things? Or a car wreck with somebody who allegedly
Speaker 2: had COVID? But I digress. What would happen if a
Speaker 2: deadlier virus hit US?
Speaker 6: No known virus, well, there could be many such viruses
Speaker 6: hidden deep within the perma frost. The palm of frost
Speaker 6: is a permanently frozen layer or one on or under
Speaker 6: the Earth's surface. It consists of soil, gravel, and sand,
Speaker 6: usually bound together by ice.
Speaker 4: And now a warming planet is causing the glaciers to melt.
Speaker 6: What I mean to say is that our protective white
Speaker 6: layer is melting more rapidly than we can imagine. Earlier,
Speaker 6: our main concern was the amount of greenhouse gases being
Speaker 6: released from the frost melting away, But now we have
Speaker 6: a different concern altogether, it is the release of dangerous
Speaker 6: ancient microbes buried deep under the permanent frozen zone.
Speaker 4: And this is according to researchers who.
Speaker 6: Revived nearly a dozen viruses, including one frozen under a
Speaker 6: lake more than forty eight thousand years ago in the
Speaker 6: Siberia region of Russia. The researchers who have revived a
Speaker 6: number of these zombie viruses as they are now being called,
Speaker 6: have found the potential revival of viruses could infect animals
Speaker 6: or humans. Now this is quite problematic. Moreover, in a
Speaker 6: report published in Science Alert, the same was reiterated by
Speaker 6: the lead researcher, Jean Marie Olympique from the French National
Speaker 6: Center for Scientific Research, said that these reanimating viruses are
Speaker 6: potentially a significant threat to public health, although further study
Speaker 6: needs to be done to us says the danger that
Speaker 6: these infectious agents could pose as they are eventually released
Speaker 6: into the atmosphere.
Speaker 4: Now this is a cause of concern as.
Speaker 6: A virus is something that is neither living or dead,
Speaker 6: and it has the capability of being dormant for many years.
Speaker 6: But now with the perma frost melting away, these viruses
Speaker 6: pose a significant threat to public health and clearly it
Speaker 6: once again.
Speaker 4: Shows the perils of playing with nature and clearly.
Speaker 6: More research is needed to evaluate the dangers associated with
Speaker 6: climate change. Now to understand what this means, we are
Speaker 6: now being joined by Sarah Pitt from London.
Speaker 4: She is the principal lecturer in.
Speaker 6: Microbiology at the University of Brighton in England. Welcome to
Speaker 6: the broadcast Sarum. Hello, so this is of course a
Speaker 6: rather unique finding. We're talking about zombie viruses. Can you
Speaker 6: explain how such viruses can survive for millions of years
Speaker 6: frozen in glaciers and ice, and how exactly can they
Speaker 6: be brought back to life?
Speaker 7: Well, as you were saying there, because the permafrost is
Speaker 7: like a giant deep freezer, a very low temperature deep freezer.
Speaker 7: Viruses can survive under those conditions. We keep them in
Speaker 7: the laboratory minus eighty degrees and they stay such that
Speaker 7: we can grow them again at once we thaw them out.
Speaker 7: And viruses do need to live in organic material, such
Speaker 7: as an animal that died having still carrying that infection,
Speaker 7: and if that happens, you know the animal is preserved intact,
Speaker 7: and so or any infectious agents that might be inside
Speaker 7: it so as everything starts to thaw out because they've
Speaker 7: been perfectly preserved, or the cells inside the animal and
Speaker 7: the tissues inside the animals start to revive, and the
Speaker 7: viruses and inside them could also can also revive at
Speaker 7: the same time.
Speaker 6: Sarah, also, can you tell us how these viruses could
Speaker 6: infect other organisms and spread rapidly even before we can
Speaker 6: find a way to negave them.
Speaker 7: Well, the thing about it is that if they're viruses
Speaker 7: which are thousands of years old, they might be ones
Speaker 7: that we're not particularly familiar with. They might be closely
Speaker 7: related to something that we have around now, but it
Speaker 7: won't be something that we necessarily know. So animals or
Speaker 7: even human beings get infected with those viruses, we might
Speaker 7: not recognize the symptoms, and we also might not have
Speaker 7: the diagnostic tests ready to go quite soon enough. And
Speaker 7: then that's how things spread so rapidly. As you were
Speaker 7: mentioning there, we've just well, we're still in the experience
Speaker 7: of COVID. It spread so rapidly because people didn't necessarily
Speaker 7: know the symptoms were different from flu or a cold
Speaker 7: in good time, and then it took us a little
Speaker 7: while to actually develop the diagnostic tests. We did a
Speaker 7: really good job with coronavirus because it is closely related
Speaker 7: to the stars CoV two. Coronavirus was closely related to
Speaker 7: STARS one and other sorts of common cold viruses, so
Speaker 7: we had a bit of a head start from a
Speaker 7: diagnostic point of view, whereas if they're sort of thousands
Speaker 7: of years old and we don't know anything about them,
Speaker 7: it will take us a bit longer to get the
Speaker 7: diagnostic tests, and so the virus could's really spread.
Speaker 4: Bet we've really noticed that it's there, right absolutely, Sarah.
Speaker 6: But you know, while this has been here less possibly
Speaker 6: a scientific discovery, it's a little worrying as well. There's
Speaker 6: a question of ethics also that comes into play. Humans
Speaker 6: playing with nature can cause havoc. It's a recording theme
Speaker 6: in most Hollywood films, especially when you talk about zombie viruses.
Speaker 6: Can you share how climate change poses dangers which have
Speaker 6: not yet been figured.
Speaker 7: Out well, in the same way that we don't really
Speaker 7: know what's going to happen as the climate across the
Speaker 7: world changes, where things becoming, these things thawing out, which
Speaker 7: might have infectious agents inside them. There's also a potential
Speaker 7: risk for things like anthrax because the spores from that's
Speaker 7: caused by a bacteria that produces these very very resistant spores,
Speaker 7: and again they can be inside animal skins and the
Speaker 7: bodies of humans who have been infected with it, and
Speaker 7: they potentially survive for a very long time and very
Speaker 7: very well under frozen conditions or just being deeply buried
Speaker 7: in the earth. Actually, and another thing that can happen
Speaker 7: is things like mosquitoes perhaps change their habits and their
Speaker 7: habitat and they might actually start as with global warming,
Speaker 7: as the temperature warms up everywhere, and it also is
Speaker 7: more wet that The thing with global warming is, as
Speaker 7: we've all noticed, there's a lot more rain, and that's
Speaker 7: very good for mosquitoes. They could potentially, I'm not saying
Speaker 7: they will, but they could potentially spread around the world
Speaker 7: and take things like I don't know, zeca virus or
Speaker 7: malaria to countries that didn't previously have them because they
Speaker 7: don't have the right species of mosquito. So that could allen.
Speaker 7: It's all in theory, but it's something that we do
Speaker 7: need to be aware of absolutely.
Speaker 6: Sarah, thank you so much for all those insights and
Speaker 6: thanks for joining us on the Climate Tracker today.
Speaker 2: We on one as one is not okay, So they
Speaker 2: only briefly touched on this being a potential zombie virus. However,
Speaker 2: that's not exactly the entire story. We're going to go
Speaker 2: now to CBSN. This was nine years ago that they
Speaker 2: ran this story about zombies. And keep in mind, we
Speaker 2: just ran about the contingency plan eight eight eight eight.
Speaker 2: So let's see what they had to say about it.
Speaker 8: If you're the kind of person who strategizes about how
Speaker 8: to survive the walking dead, this could be crucial life
Speaker 8: saving information. Researchers have rated the best and worst cities
Speaker 8: in the case of zombie apocalypse. Economic modeling specialists International
Speaker 8: ranked cities on their ability to defend against a zombie attack,
Speaker 8: stockpiling food containing zombies, finding a cure, and if you
Speaker 8: live in New York City, hate to be the bearer
Speaker 8: of bad news, but your toast. The city got the
Speaker 8: worst rating, followed by Tampa, Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bergandino,
Speaker 8: California Southern California really stinks, and chicag So the nation's
Speaker 8: three biggest cities right best place to be Boston. The
Speaker 8: city was rated as the place you most likely would survive.
Speaker 8: Other contenders here a Salt Lake City, Columbus, Ohio, Baltimore,
Speaker 8: Virginia Beach, and Norfolk, Virginia.
Speaker 4: But you know, I just have a problem with this
Speaker 4: right here.
Speaker 8: I live in New York City, and I will admit
Speaker 8: that Manhattan may not be the best place to survive
Speaker 8: a zombie apocalypse. Number one, the food is going to
Speaker 8: go really fast. Number two, they can climb stairs, and
Speaker 8: as everyone knows, your buildings go up really high. But
Speaker 8: think if you live in Brooklyn, also part of New
Speaker 8: York City, or Staten Island, you could contain the threat
Speaker 8: to Manhattan and still have lots of farmland to grow food.
Speaker 2: So they had this organization put together this list, and
Speaker 2: again nine years ago. So I found the list and
Speaker 2: we don't have to read through all of it, because
Speaker 2: I'm be honest with you, Boston is not the number
Speaker 2: one place you want to be for a fucking zombie apocalypse. Okay,
Speaker 2: you don't want to be anywhere near major cities. That's
Speaker 2: that's just dumb. But as far as to maintain some
Speaker 2: sort of assimbilance of normal life, I guess was their
Speaker 2: their goal here. But they gave it a defense score.
Speaker 2: A contaminant a containment score, excuse me, cure score, food score,
Speaker 2: total score, and then the final rankings. What are your
Speaker 2: thoughts on this list, dude?
Speaker 1: I think that it makes sense. I don't know why
Speaker 1: they would still be naming cities as some of the
Speaker 1: best places to go to. Whenever they were talking about
Speaker 1: Virginia Beach, Well, I guess Virginia Beach isn't super I
Speaker 1: mean it's still pretty populated, like Baltimore is still pretty populated,
Speaker 1: you know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, this is what I'm saying, Like, of the entire list,
Speaker 2: Virginia Beach might and very very uneasy might be the
Speaker 2: best option that they talked about here. But that's also
Speaker 2: because of the beach. So you have like fishing access,
Speaker 2: you have the ocean, you could desalinate the water and
Speaker 2: have a drinking source like that. I could understand, Like.
Speaker 1: Why not go out to some fucking like bumfuck West
Speaker 1: Texas somewhere, you know what I'm saying, Like that seems.
Speaker 2: Like the place to be, right, But it depends on survivability.
Speaker 2: Are you farming for your food? Is infrastructure still in place?
Speaker 2: There's a lot of things that I don't know what
Speaker 2: exactly they took into account. However, I do like their
Speaker 2: defense scoring all this for the worst cities like Vegas, Providence,
Speaker 2: Rhode Island, Milwaukee, Jacksonville, Florida, Miami, Florida, Chicago, Riverside Slash,
Speaker 2: San Bernardino, California, La, Tampa, and New York. That all
Speaker 2: of those I think would be really bad places.
Speaker 1: To be just saying, yeah, yeah, for sure, I mean uh,
Speaker 1: and a lot of those are like, uh, you know,
Speaker 1: like what am I trying to say? The fucking not islands,
Speaker 1: but you know, kind of places that you would go
Speaker 1: to visit, like on vacations and stuff.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, destinations, Yeah, right right. I feel that now
Speaker 2: it says the five best equipped for defense cities, this
Speaker 2: I have a few problems with, depending on what you
Speaker 2: mean by defense. Uh, Virginia Beach is number one. Okay,
Speaker 2: they have some military installations there, and again it's not
Speaker 2: the worst like strategic geolocation, so I get that. Next
Speaker 2: to Atlanta, Georgia, all right, then Baltimore, Maryland, Washington, d C.
Speaker 2: And Kansas City. I think Kansas City might be easily defendable.
Speaker 2: It's like in the middle of bump fuck nowhere Kansas, right.
Speaker 2: But same time, how in the hell do you think
Speaker 2: DC is easily defendable.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's not exactly the best place to go
Speaker 1: for something like that, I would think, But unless they
Speaker 1: have some kind of nuclear shit going.
Speaker 2: On in DC, that's fair. I'm sure they have nuclear
Speaker 2: deterrence too. Maybe that was it because like that's the
Speaker 2: defensive hub of America, So maybe that like okay, all right, uh,
Speaker 2: the five cities worst equipped for defense. I'm gonna go
Speaker 2: from pressing order from the least to the worst here, Cincinnati, Ohio,
Speaker 2: San Bernardino, California, Portland, Oregon, Detroit, Michigan, and Grand Rapids, Michigan. Okay, again,
Speaker 2: I'm not sure I necessarily agree with everything on this list,
Speaker 2: but I still thought it was pretty pretty.
Speaker 1: Crazy Portland, Oregon. That's that's how that's a worst equipped
Speaker 1: place or one of the worst equipped places, which kind
Speaker 1: of makes sense as to how Chaz was able to survive. Yeah,
Speaker 1: no zombies, good.
Speaker 2: While that was for a good little while too. That
Speaker 2: wasn't like a one day experiment.
Speaker 1: I think you can call that a zombie outbreak.
Speaker 2: It's kind of close.
Speaker 1: I mean, they're as retarded as as zombies.
Speaker 2: Brain dead, dude, they were being led by a SoundCloud
Speaker 2: wrapper that was their their duly appointed leader, Like, let
Speaker 2: that one sink in.
Speaker 1: You're just planning pretend at that point, because there's no
Speaker 1: way you're gonna win that.
Speaker 2: They they did until people started dying and until they
Speaker 2: had they needed food. Then they went back to crying
Speaker 2: about it. It was ridiculous anyway, all right. So now
Speaker 2: the five cities best equipped for containment Denver, Colorado at
Speaker 2: number one. Thought that was interesting, Houston, Texas number two,
Speaker 2: Salt Lake's Seattle, and Detroit. These are for if you
Speaker 2: it happens there, it could be easily contained there. Okay,
Speaker 2: five worst cities for containment basically, if it goes if
Speaker 2: it starts here, it's spreading like fucking wildfires, that we
Speaker 2: could do about it, right in order from best case
Speaker 2: to worst case of the list, Philadelphia, Chicago, Miami, LA.
Speaker 2: And the worst of the worst, New York City. I
Speaker 2: kind of agree with some of that.
Speaker 1: Five cities most likely to find a cure would be Boston,
Speaker 1: San France, San Diego, Indianapolis, and Baltimore and the five So.
Speaker 2: Did Indianapolis come out here as a possible find a
Speaker 2: cure spot?
Speaker 1: Oh, maybe they have some laboratories there that are pretty
Speaker 1: pretty good or something.
Speaker 2: Maybe they got like a really bomb ass medical college
Speaker 2: there or something.
Speaker 1: Okay, and the five least likely cities to find a
Speaker 1: cure would be, uh, Atlanta, Georgia, Chicago, Las Vegas, San Bernardo,
Speaker 1: and Charlotte, North Carolina.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and keep in mind, these are just like the
Speaker 2: fifty three cities, Like there was obviously a list of
Speaker 2: fifty three then they just like went with it. Maybe
Speaker 2: those are like the financial hubs of America. So like,
Speaker 2: if this happens, you know, who knows five cities with
Speaker 2: the highest food supply? Grand Rapids, Columbus, Rochester, Memphis, and
Speaker 2: Buffalo three of the or two of those in New York.
Speaker 2: Look at that. The five cities lowest food supply New Orleans, Louisiana.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna have to respectfully disagree with you. In what
Speaker 2: world is New Orleans Louisiana ever gonna be low on food?
Speaker 3: Bro?
Speaker 1: Maybe that's just as far as like getting it there.
Speaker 2: They fish in the Mississippi for all the seafood. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I don't know, I think they were kind of crazy
Speaker 2: on that one, But all right. San Jose, California, Austin, Texas, Tucson, Arizona,
Speaker 2: and Washington, DC, and I would agree with that. Washington
Speaker 2: doesn't grow shit for themselves. It's all brought in on trucks.
Speaker 2: I did want to see this one as well. Here
Speaker 2: is the CDC's announcement for the zombie apocalypse. This was
Speaker 2: three years ago. Let's hear about it from old Fox
Speaker 2: News is trying.
Speaker 5: To prepare us for this a zombie apocalypse. The infamous
Speaker 5: astrologer No Sir Damis predicted something like this could happen
Speaker 5: in twenty twenty one. Specifically, he set a scientist is
Speaker 5: going to create a quote biological weapon that will bring
Speaker 5: the dead back to life. CDC says, well, that's not
Speaker 5: likely to happen, but just in case, the agency wants
Speaker 5: you to be prepared. They have a new ad campaign
Speaker 5: telling you to get ready for the emergency. It includes
Speaker 5: this poster advising you to get a kit, make a plan,
Speaker 5: and be prepared. CDC experts say you should prepare for
Speaker 5: zombies just like you would prepare for any real life emergency.
Speaker 5: They want you to create an emergency kit with essentials
Speaker 5: like food and water, medications, important documents, and first aid.
Speaker 5: You can find the full zombie Survival Guide or advice
Speaker 5: for any other emergencies.
Speaker 4: It's up right now on the.
Speaker 5: CDC website as hilarious as what may seem. Hm. You know,
Speaker 5: twenty twenty one brought us things that we never expected,
Speaker 5: so why rule it out?
Speaker 2: You know, not just okay, you remember that we even
Speaker 2: talked about it. The CDC had this whole thing up
Speaker 2: for a while, how to survive a zombie outbreak, And
Speaker 2: it was as a way to joke about the people
Speaker 2: who were talking showing them during COVID no oh.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, that's they go all out, dude, to try
Speaker 1: and push propaganda and you know, making zombie related comments here.
Speaker 1: You know, they were probably saying, well, look, you're going
Speaker 1: to turn into a zombie unless you get this vaccine.
Speaker 2: I could see it a one hundred percent. I could
Speaker 2: see it, especially with whatever go next go round of
Speaker 2: apocalypse we just happened to live through next. Brother, I
Speaker 2: don't even know what to expect, but I know it's coming.
Speaker 2: I know we're on track for one. But all of
Speaker 2: this to say that, yes, con Plan eight eight eight
Speaker 2: eight is a real contingency plan that the Department of
Speaker 2: Defense really did work on and submit And if anybody
Speaker 2: wants to go ahead and say, well, you know, it
Speaker 2: was just a joke. It was a war college thing.
Speaker 2: It was a it was a strategy to train the
Speaker 2: young officers. Jonathan, do you know how much that plan
Speaker 2: costs the US taxpayer?
Speaker 3: Uh?
Speaker 1: I have no idea to even I don't even know
Speaker 1: where to guess.
Speaker 2: Okay, big dog, big dog. Just so you're clear, this
Speaker 2: wasn't a couple of young junior officers that were bullshitting
Speaker 2: in the O club one day, the Officers Club, swirling
Speaker 2: their scotch and talking about the latest zombie movie that
Speaker 2: they had just recently watched, and cool, cool, cool, bro,
Speaker 2: we need to just like get a plan down, yo,
Speaker 2: let's fucking do it. Oh yeah, that'd be fun. And
Speaker 2: they just like were bullshitting. No, this is not what
Speaker 2: this was. An entire Department of Defense, okay, joint Department
Speaker 2: of Defense thing was done to make this happen. A
Speaker 2: joint task force was put together, Budgets were submitted and
Speaker 2: approved for this to happen. Because everything has to be
Speaker 2: paid for. Conplan eight eight eight eight cost the taxpayers
Speaker 2: thirty eight million dollars to develop.
Speaker 1: It doesn't surprise me, yef that we were reading just now,
Speaker 1: like I don't understand what where's that money going if
Speaker 1: all of this is just subjective.
Speaker 2: That PDF that we just read with that little stupid
Speaker 2: zombie graphic with the big red letter saying disclaimer, all
Speaker 2: that that costs US thirty eight million dollars.
Speaker 1: So a theory cost thirty eight million, And they.
Speaker 2: Made so many jokes, They brought up signs with mel Gibson,
Speaker 2: they brought up these movies. All of that was done
Speaker 2: by a Department of Defense quote unquote think tank that
Speaker 2: actually cost taxpayer dollars.
Speaker 1: That doesn't make sense because first of all, that we
Speaker 1: were let that one cook dude. Yeah, like what we
Speaker 1: were just reading it wasn't even properly edited, Like there
Speaker 1: were a lot of like words in there that weren't
Speaker 1: spelled correctly.
Speaker 4: And you know, Ah, Then.
Speaker 1: To me, whenever I hear shit like that, I'm like,
Speaker 1: why the fuck are we paying taxes? Like, why are
Speaker 1: we paying taxes? Is it well for a fucking zombie
Speaker 1: outbreak thing?
Speaker 2: Dude?
Speaker 1: We just paid thirty eight million dollars in tax paying
Speaker 1: money for that bullshit.
Speaker 2: Okay, you know what, maybe I'm just a dirty capitalist
Speaker 2: for this one. I don't know. I'm kind of on
Speaker 2: the fence here. I would much rather our tax dollars
Speaker 2: be used by US military to develop some wild shit
Speaker 2: than to go to Ukraine to fund a war that
Speaker 2: we don't have no interest in. That's just me. Oh,
Speaker 2: I agree, I'd rather. I'm not mad that the tax
Speaker 2: dollars were spent. As a matter of fact, it kind
Speaker 2: of gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling to know
Speaker 2: that the government actually has a contingency plan for even
Speaker 2: that scenario. So like, in one way, I'm like, all right,
Speaker 2: so we're literally prepared for anything. Actually, okay, okn know what, Jacob.
Speaker 1: They could have just paid us, I don't know, five
Speaker 1: hundred grand and we would have happily come up with
Speaker 1: that in a week.
Speaker 2: Oh bro. I would have had a whole video edited.
Speaker 2: I would have had like scientists come in to talk
Speaker 2: about it. I could have put together a whole fucking weekend.
Speaker 2: Are you kidding me?
Speaker 1: Yeah? That seems like, uh a cover up as to
Speaker 1: where that money actually went, because there's no fucking way
Speaker 1: that cost that much money.
Speaker 2: Dude. Oh you do again, that's con plan eight thousand,
Speaker 2: eight hundred and eighty eight. Oh was I want to
Speaker 2: talk about how many other contingency plans and operational plans
Speaker 2: that have tax dollars associated with them that amounted to nothing.
Speaker 2: That's just to pad the books.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, dog, it was a con plan, all right,
Speaker 1: Condus the fuck out of our money is really what happened.
Speaker 2: But if a zombie outbreak was to happen, which they
Speaker 2: were talking about it, I didn't pull up another article.
Speaker 2: It was the Indian group that was saying that one
Speaker 2: of the pathogens that was found in the permafral in Siberia,
Speaker 2: they are saying that it potentially could be a zombie
Speaker 2: style virus. Now, there's no at this time evidence to
Speaker 2: say that humans of our day and age would be
Speaker 2: susceptible to it. However, the fact that they found it
Speaker 2: leads credence to and yes, I know, global warming. M okay, listen,
Speaker 2: hold on, hold on. The ice is melting. That much
Speaker 2: is true. Okay, the earth being it is getting warmer.
Speaker 2: That much is also true. While we may or may
Speaker 2: not be the cause of it, we being human beings
Speaker 2: in heavy industry, we may or may not be the
Speaker 2: cause of that. I don't know either way you want
Speaker 2: to slice it. The ice is melting, and that's also
Speaker 2: how we're able to remember they found that wooly mammoth,
Speaker 2: right because the permafrost is melting. So with that being said,
Speaker 2: as it continues to melt, if more things get exposed,
Speaker 2: what's to say that some sort of pathogen that we
Speaker 2: haven't on earth seen in thousands of years comes out
Speaker 2: that hits us like the Black plague or as wild
Speaker 2: as it may seem, something zombiesque. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Can I just put something into perspective right here? The
Speaker 1: amount of taxes that the government makes off of its
Speaker 1: own people. Do you know how much money that is
Speaker 1: per year? Oh dude, Oh no, no, it's ridiculous.
Speaker 2: Hold on, hold on? Are we finding that out? Do
Speaker 2: we need to tell the children? There's no Santa Claus
Speaker 2: that hard dude, brother, all right, take a disclaimer, disclaimer everybody,
Speaker 2: This is gonna hurt. This is gonna be a very
Speaker 2: spicy pill to swallow. I apologize in advance, like there's
Speaker 2: no comfortable way to hear this.
Speaker 1: Four point nine two trillion dollars in taxes in just
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four, Yeah, almost five trillion dollars that they've
Speaker 1: sucked all of us dry for to do, fucking dumb
Speaker 1: ass theories like this zombie outbreak scenario, and that's just
Speaker 1: one of them. Think about all of them that have
Speaker 1: happened to time. All the money that we're sending to Ukraine,
Speaker 1: that's fucking pennies to them.
Speaker 2: Dude, Rennie, you understand how much money and aid we
Speaker 2: give to other countries. We just sent Vietnam a million
Speaker 2: dollars because they just got to hit with a hurricane.
Speaker 2: We just did that. Enough of any idea how much
Speaker 2: money we just hand over to everybody for any fucking reason. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: we give our own people seven fifty one time fucking
Speaker 2: check that's actually alone that they get taxed on. Here
Speaker 2: we go.
Speaker 1: Do you want to see how that's breaking broken down?
Speaker 1: The largest sources of federal revenue are coming in at
Speaker 1: the top. Number one. The best way that the money
Speaker 1: collects money is individual income taxes. In twenty twenty two,
Speaker 1: individual income taxes accounted for more than half of total
Speaker 1: federal revenues, more than half. So you have five trillion
Speaker 1: in total. More than half of that came from pockets
Speaker 1: like me and you.
Speaker 2: So real quick. Also, not to detract, but we're gonna
Speaker 2: stay on this topic. Remember when I said that Taylor
Speaker 2: Swift accounted for one percent of America's GDP last year.
Speaker 2: That one percent isn't a small chunk by any means, Brother.
Speaker 1: Bro one percent of five trillion dollars.
Speaker 2: Alone herself, that her company, not her subsidiaries, tayte herself
Speaker 2: dog the tax revenue insane.
Speaker 1: The next one would be the payroll taxes that fund
Speaker 1: Social Security, Medicare, the railroad retirement system, unemployment, and unemployment insurance.
Speaker 1: In twenty twenty two, Oh my god. In twenty twenty two,
Speaker 1: payroll taxes accounted for an average of forty five hundred
Speaker 1: dollars per person.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I could see that per person.
Speaker 1: So this is they're taxing you on the back end, now.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and then tax you forwards, front ways, sideways, inside, outside.
Speaker 1: Everything, and then after individual income taxes, after pay taxes,
Speaker 1: then corporate income taxes, which are then taxed as as
Speaker 1: an extra fee on top of whatever you're buying from
Speaker 1: the person. So yeah, your tax for making money, your packs,
Speaker 1: for your your tax for you know, spending money, and
Speaker 1: then your TAXT for everything else. Every single way, you're
Speaker 1: literally taxed six days a Sunday.
Speaker 2: So have you ever seen Ron Swanson on parks and
Speaker 2: rec talk about income tax that little girl that time.
Speaker 1: Uh yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, I saw that.
Speaker 2: That was perfect. That was a perfect example. It was
Speaker 2: a sandwich. And he said, Okay, you have a sandwich.
Speaker 2: If you want to eat it, it's yours. If you
Speaker 2: want to throw it in the trash, that's your prerogative,
Speaker 2: do it to what you want. But here I am
Speaker 2: the government, and since you have your sandwich in my realm,
Speaker 2: I get to go ahead and take half of it
Speaker 2: off the top. And then let's also talk about your
Speaker 2: capital gains tax, let's talk about your land tax, let's
Speaker 2: talk about your homeowner's tax, all these things. Basically you
Speaker 2: end up with like a bite of the sandwich that
Speaker 2: you're told to be grateful for. Yes, that's about the
Speaker 2: correct analysis.
Speaker 1: Land of the free, baby, indeed.
Speaker 2: But uh, with that being said, yes, we're the land
Speaker 2: of the free, and there's a lot of things to
Speaker 2: be joking about with that. This is America, you know,
Speaker 2: I get it. We're all so ready for that smoke
Speaker 2: with the zombies. Dude, Yeah, sure, it's wild, it's wild.
Speaker 2: So yeah, man just wanted to talk about it. Con
Speaker 2: Plan eight eight eight eight, and uh, ladies and gentlemen,
Speaker 2: we need to just further address this for what it is.
Speaker 2: They are worried about zombies, they are spending our tax
Speaker 2: dollars for it. Oh yeah, sure, it's just a joking
Speaker 2: little plan that was made. Hahaha, just like the Zombie
Speaker 2: Survival book. Right, that was just a joke written by
Speaker 2: mel brooks Son. Right, that's all that was, except they
Speaker 2: actually tax dollars on it. It's actually a DoD official
Speaker 2: document that had to be released in PDF form because
Speaker 2: of a freedom of information request. So you make out
Speaker 2: of that what you want. You take whatever steps you
Speaker 2: personally need to take to prepare or laugh at this
Speaker 2: maybe a little bit of both. But uh, just thought
Speaker 2: it was something that we need to talk about here
Speaker 2: on the cult conspiracy. I thought it was fun as hell.
Speaker 1: No, yeah, it was definitely fun. It's a fun little
Speaker 1: game to play. And whether there's ever going to be
Speaker 1: a zombie, we don't know. I currently think that there
Speaker 1: are already zombies and they weren't necessarily infected by any
Speaker 1: kind of organism. They were infected because their minds were
Speaker 1: too feeble and weak, and they allowed others to take
Speaker 1: control of them via media.
Speaker 7: Yeah.
Speaker 2: I don't know, man, I do believe zombies are gonna
Speaker 2: be real if they're not already, I personally do. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Okay, well, I mean I guess we'll see. I feel like,
Speaker 1: you know, now the Trump's president, they're gonna be throwing
Speaker 1: all kind of crazy shit out of them. So I
Speaker 1: think we're primed up for something like this to happen.
Speaker 2: Oh my god, if thiss hombie outbreak was to happen
Speaker 2: because this election. But you know what, if it was
Speaker 2: gonna happen, now would be the time.
Speaker 1: It would be. It would be. But you know what, else,
Speaker 1: it's time for some knifee.
Speaker 2: If you have it, Dear cult members, please at this time,
Speaker 2: hit the five stars, hit the share the likes, subscribe
Speaker 2: the comment, leave a post, leave review, shares with the
Speaker 2: friends of family, shares everywhere. Here's the deal. The more
Speaker 2: activity the algorithm see across all of our listening platforms,
Speaker 2: the more we get promoted some more potential listeners who
Speaker 2: could then become potential cult members like the rest of you.
Speaker 2: Find lanes and gentlemen, we thank you for everybody who
Speaker 2: has already gone and done so. If you have it,
Speaker 2: do so at this time, and while you're at it,
Speaker 2: go to metal Mysteries. Give Jonathan's other show the love,
Speaker 2: the five star reviews, the comments, the post, the shares,
Speaker 2: all the things. Go check out CA Tonight YouTube channel
Speaker 2: and give it all the subscribes and the loves as well.
Speaker 2: We thank you for everybody wh's already gone and done so.
Speaker 1: And with that being said, this was another beautiful episode
Speaker 1: of the Cults of Conspiracy. And my name's Jonathan, I'm Jake.
Speaker 1: And there's one very important and surely vital piece of
Speaker 1: information we need to learn just as soon as hugely possible.
Speaker 3: That so
Speaker 1: See so to speak,