Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the
Speaker 1: David Knight Show. As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Friday,
Speaker 1: the sixteenth of August. Here of our Lord, twenty twenty four.
Speaker 1: We're going to take a look at talk about antitrust,
Speaker 1: about tax cuts. When are the what did the conservatives
Speaker 1: and libertarians starting to become opponents of tax cuts? And
Speaker 1: this isn't even a partisan issue. This is, you know,
Speaker 1: the same tax cut that's you know, La La copied
Speaker 1: after Trump. They said, well, we can't do that. So
Speaker 1: we're going to talk about the economics, so that we're
Speaker 1: going to ask which one of the Bilderburgers is going
Speaker 1: to rule us? And we're going to take a look
Speaker 1: at the fear, the fear that is pushing pandemics, you know,
Speaker 1: the let's go for the lesser of the evils. You know,
Speaker 1: I don't want to get six, so let's use the mass,
Speaker 1: the jabs, the lockdowns, restless stuff or elections. There's time
Speaker 1: for us to call us out of fear around one
Speaker 1: of these candidates. And you hear this a lot as well.
Speaker 1: So we're going to take a look at what Matt
Speaker 1: Walsh is saying about that what John MacArthur is saying
Speaker 1: about that you can't you got to vote one way
Speaker 1: or the other. Oh, you're not a part of the tribe.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back, stay with us. Well, there's a
Speaker 1: lot of chatter now about the Department of Justice wanting
Speaker 1: to break up Google. Let me tell you this is
Speaker 1: not the way you're going to stop a monopoly. The
Speaker 1: antitrust laws have never worked against anyone. They didn't work
Speaker 1: well what happened with Microsoft. But before that, what happened
Speaker 1: with the original anti trust movements against Rockefeller, against standard Oil.
Speaker 1: And it's important to go back and look at the
Speaker 1: history of Rockefeller. How he became in his day the
Speaker 1: richest man in the world. He was of draft age
Speaker 1: as a Civil war was breaking out. Now there had
Speaker 1: been a lot of industrial uses for turpentine, and it
Speaker 1: was all coming from the South, and so the North
Speaker 1: had pretty much cut off their sources for turpentine. But
Speaker 1: they had at that time identified some uses for this
Speaker 1: new stuff that was really kind of just bubbling up
Speaker 1: out of the ground. In Pennsylvania. That's why we have
Speaker 1: Quaker State and all these other things, because there was
Speaker 1: a pens oil because there was so much oil in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: It's kind of like the Beverly Hillbillies. Up from the
Speaker 1: ground comes a bubbling crude. And so there was a
Speaker 1: tremendous amount of oil. They were refining it to replace
Speaker 1: the loss of turpentine during the war. And so what
Speaker 1: Rockefeller did was he he paid somebody to take his
Speaker 1: place in the war, and he began setting up refining operations,
Speaker 1: and he began buying refiners essentially, is what he started doing.
Speaker 1: You get a little bit of it going and then
Speaker 1: start making a monopoly out of it. They thought that
Speaker 1: was the only place in the world where there was
Speaker 1: oil at the time. You know, fossil fuel, it doesn't
Speaker 1: exist very rare, right, And so he got a very
Speaker 1: effective little monopoly there in Pennsylvania. Then later oil was
Speaker 1: discovered in Texas, like, oh, oh, well, now what do
Speaker 1: I do. I don't have a monopoly down there. Well,
Speaker 1: he moved the refinery is standard oil. He moved him
Speaker 1: over to Ohio to take advantage of what was coming
Speaker 1: out of Texas. He was still focused on the refinery
Speaker 1: aspect of it, and all of the efforts to try
Speaker 1: to break up Standard oil and all the rest of
Speaker 1: the stuff. They just counted it with different structures. They
Speaker 1: had interlocking directories and other things like that, but they
Speaker 1: never stopped that monopoly. What somewhat put a halt to it,
Speaker 1: even though still the richest man was the discovery of
Speaker 1: oil in the Middle East, and then it moved to
Speaker 1: there and the games began again. The reason I bring
Speaker 1: this up is because the only way that you're going
Speaker 1: to find a monopoly in something is to introduce something
Speaker 1: completely different, and so you've got to have to restructure
Speaker 1: the Internet. You're going to have to have a new
Speaker 1: set of priorities. When George Gilder talked about Google, he
Speaker 1: said he wrote the book and a few years ago
Speaker 1: he said, I'm in my eighties now, but I think
Speaker 1: I'm going to live to see Google taken down. Not
Speaker 1: because of antitrust stuff, he said because and the name
Speaker 1: of the book was Life After Google by George Gilder.
Speaker 1: He said, I think people need to are going if
Speaker 1: we can sell the idea that you need to control
Speaker 1: your data instead of having it available to everybody else,
Speaker 1: and that's really what we're talking about. Was something like Noster.
Speaker 1: You know, Jack Dorsey is saying that he's working on
Speaker 1: the same type of thing, you being able to control
Speaker 1: your data, you being able to decide what you filter
Speaker 1: out if you do filter out anything. And so if
Speaker 1: people believe that that is important, it would completely destroy
Speaker 1: Google's data model, which is all about you. It's about
Speaker 1: using you as cattle, using you as to feed off
Speaker 1: of whether it's their search engines and selling your data
Speaker 1: and your behavior and your habits, or whether it is
Speaker 1: looking at everything that you're doing and feeding their AI
Speaker 1: compute models. And so if people are tired of that,
Speaker 1: they're tired of being cash cows for them, if they're
Speaker 1: tired of being hooked into the matrix and mined, well,
Speaker 1: then if they want privacy, that would be the way
Speaker 1: to stop Google. But I think what the Department of
Speaker 1: Justice is doing. I don't think really that the Democrats
Speaker 1: are so tied and with Google, and have been when
Speaker 1: George Gilder was George got when Eric Schmidt was still
Speaker 1: with Google and Obama was president, it was amazing they
Speaker 1: had like two hundred and fifty Google employees at the
Speaker 1: White House and so incredibly tied end and Eric Schmidt
Speaker 1: is very tied in with Google, talking about how he
Speaker 1: can use artificial intelligence and leverage other technology to help
Speaker 1: the Democrats win. That's what he's talking about. At the
Speaker 1: Aspen Institute. There's an excellent article from The Last Vagabond
Speaker 1: that I want to get to today which talks about
Speaker 1: that very thing about Eric Schmidt and about his influence
Speaker 1: and the Pentagon, his influence with the Democrat Party. So
Speaker 1: I don't think he's no longer at Google. But I
Speaker 1: still don't think that this is about anything other than
Speaker 1: number one, virtue signaling to the public about something that
Speaker 1: isn't going to happen. And number two, I think that
Speaker 1: it's about bringing them to heal and about getting them
Speaker 1: even more closely tied to the government, to DARPA like Microsoft.
Speaker 1: That's what came out of the Microsoft antitrust attacks. Microsoft
Speaker 1: is at the very center of all these things. They're
Speaker 1: at the center of News Guard, They're at the center
Speaker 1: of Election Guard, They're at the center of the Content
Speaker 1: Coalition for Providence and Authentication, the CCPA. I like call
Speaker 1: it the Chinese Communist Party of America because that's what
Speaker 1: it's about. And so they're using Microsoft as and openly
Speaker 1: so giving them lots of money. I mean the ten
Speaker 1: million dollar grant from DARPA for Election Guard the only
Speaker 1: grant given to that company that's wholly owned by Microsoft.
Speaker 1: And so I think that's what this is really all about.
Speaker 1: Democrats squeezing them from money, squeezing them for some kind
Speaker 1: of new cooperation, just like they did Gates and Microsoft.
Speaker 1: They are not going to break it up. They're just
Speaker 1: looking for control over people. Meanwhile, you have the Republican
Speaker 1: chairman Comer who James Comer, he's chairman of the House
Speaker 1: Oversight Committee, and he says, well, if Google is monopolistic,
Speaker 1: I mean, who knew until the Biden Department of Justice files.
Speaker 1: We didn't know that Google was monopolistic, did we. Well,
Speaker 1: if they're going to be a monopolistic about this stuff,
Speaker 1: then they shouldn't be getting tax dollars. Yeah, why are
Speaker 1: we giving tax dollars to the richest company and one
Speaker 1: of the richest companies in the world anyway, a lot
Speaker 1: of fat contracts and subsidies. Now, you might want to
Speaker 1: think about giving money to some other search engines if
Speaker 1: you wanted to do that, but if you had a
Speaker 1: need for that. I don't know why the government needs
Speaker 1: to be giving money to a search engine, but of
Speaker 1: course they helped to create them. The intelligence community the
Speaker 1: military industrial complex helped to create these Internet companies. But
Speaker 1: his solution is the usual thing. Hey, let's have a hearing.
Speaker 1: I know, Yeah, we can get this group together. We
Speaker 1: can all bring the TVs. We'll have a hearing about
Speaker 1: all this. And so he has contacted, he's in contact
Speaker 1: now with House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan. They're in talks.
Speaker 1: They're in talks, and they're and talks about how they
Speaker 1: can do more talks and how it can do talks
Speaker 1: on TV. Oh, that'd be great problems solved, right, These
Speaker 1: grifting posers every time you turn around, that's all they do. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: and we're talking about Google, but here's Microsoft, right, Microsoft
Speaker 1: at the center of this CCPA coalition of our Content
Speaker 1: Providence and Authentication, And what that's about is marking everything
Speaker 1: that you do with a number, so they know that
Speaker 1: this is coming from David Knight and we can stop
Speaker 1: it before he uploads it onto the Internet, because he's
Speaker 1: been identified by our coalition partners in real media, you know,
Speaker 1: like the BBC in the New York Times, those types
Speaker 1: of people, and they've told us, and so we're using
Speaker 1: our software partner and Tell and others like it who
Speaker 1: will mark anything that you create, whether it is text,
Speaker 1: a still picture of meme, or whether it is audio,
Speaker 1: or whether it is audio and video, they'll market for you. Right,
Speaker 1: and then even going to the CPU. Intel's on board
Speaker 1: with this, censorship on board with Intel. Intel's on board
Speaker 1: with it, the ARM processors on board with it, the
Speaker 1: Coalition for Content Providence who created this, and we're going
Speaker 1: to authenticate it. So we're going to mark. Everything in
Speaker 1: the world is going to be tagged. And so Microsoft
Speaker 1: is updating the cloud based services in Office three sixty
Speaker 1: five to censor hate speech or unauthorized sharing of copyrighted materials. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that was first time we got censored in twenty thirteen,
Speaker 1: the one hundred anniversary of the Federal Reserve. That's what
Speaker 1: they did. They used a copyright claim. This is from
Speaker 1: wine Press News, So you know, Microsoft government partner for
Speaker 1: all of this stuff tech Titan. Microsoft recently updated services
Speaker 1: agreement on July thirtieth that will allow the company to
Speaker 1: target and remove content across as cloud based services that
Speaker 1: promotes loosely defined hate speech and the sharing of unauthorized
Speaker 1: copyright material That's been the business model by the way
Speaker 1: of YouTube, hasn't it. I mean, really, you know what
Speaker 1: they complained about. The movie that they complained about. They
Speaker 1: use a couple of snippets of It's a Wonderful Life
Speaker 1: and with comments, but that entire movie, and that was
Speaker 1: covered under fair use. That entire movie was up on
Speaker 1: YouTube for years. I had a million views and that's
Speaker 1: where I got those clips from. And they never took
Speaker 1: that movie down. They took down my comments about the
Speaker 1: Federal Reserve off its three sixty five suite Outlook, one
Speaker 1: dry Word, Excel, PowerPoint, OneNote, share Point, and Microsoft Teams.
Speaker 1: So they're going to be scanning all of that stuff
Speaker 1: with artificial intelligence, because again, artificial intelligence is a leverage
Speaker 1: that's going to allow them to now data mine everything
Speaker 1: that you do and then to filter it to see
Speaker 1: if they like or dislike your content. They will not
Speaker 1: tolerate hate speech or unauthorized sharing of copyright material, So
Speaker 1: just shut down YouTube. Oh no, they're not going to
Speaker 1: do that. In twenty twenty two, Microsoft release an AI
Speaker 1: based detection system called Toxigen, a large scale machine generated
Speaker 1: data set for adversarial and implicit hate speech detection. Implicit
Speaker 1: you may not even realize how hateful you are. You'll
Speaker 1: have to wait until the artificial intelligence tells you it
Speaker 1: gives you a hate number, right explicit, it's implicit AI
Speaker 1: based surveillance. In twenty twenty three, Microsoft publicly launched this
Speaker 1: generative AI copilot, remember that, which has since been integrated
Speaker 1: into Microsoft products in some capacity or the other. The
Speaker 1: company has added a copilot key to the keyboard this year.
Speaker 1: By the way, that was Logitech. You know, they said, well,
Speaker 1: we're going to have this wonderful mouse and you're not
Speaker 1: going to own it, you'll rent it forever. And it's like,
Speaker 1: what is so special about this mouse? Well, we've added
Speaker 1: a new button. With that new button, you can just
Speaker 1: invoke AI to ask it questions or whatever. It's always running,
Speaker 1: always looking to see what you're doing. The tool is
Speaker 1: also used to scan content for hate speech and for
Speaker 1: other forms of content that Microsoft has prohibited. Whatever they prohibit,
Speaker 1: you know, in the future, it'll be whatever pandemic they
Speaker 1: decide to throw against us, whatever climate garbage claims they
Speaker 1: claim to throw against It's all malleable. It's just it
Speaker 1: is a tool for censorship and surveillance. As your open
Speaker 1: AI service includes a content filtering system. The filtering models
Speaker 1: hate and fairness, sexual violence, and self harm categories. They
Speaker 1: have been trained and tested in many different languages. Hate
Speaker 1: and fairness refers to any content that uses pejorative or
Speaker 1: discriminatory language, which they will determine based on attributes like race, ethnicity, nationality,
Speaker 1: gender identity, identity not real gender, but your gender identity. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm a cat, I'm a moug, I'm a half man,
Speaker 1: half dog, I'm my own best friend. It's John Candy's
Speaker 1: gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, religion except for the
Speaker 1: Christian religion. You can come after the Christian religion. Immigration status,
Speaker 1: stability status, personal appearance, and body size. I don't want
Speaker 1: say anything about body size. The list is extendable. It
Speaker 1: can be anything and everything. And of course you know
Speaker 1: that this is why they're talking about. But what they're
Speaker 1: really going to be coming after, it's going to be
Speaker 1: the pandemic mcguffins and the climate mcguffins. And so then
Speaker 1: they have a corresponding list for things that are sexual again,
Speaker 1: it's going to be the gender types of things. Winepress
Speaker 1: News says. On top of this, Microsoft in twenty twenty
Speaker 1: two released an inclusiveness word checker for word that would
Speaker 1: autocorrect pronouns and other phrases based on gender and ethnicity. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, these are the same people that have decided
Speaker 1: that they're not going to use God's preferred pronouns and
Speaker 1: in their churches and their translations of the Bible.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: Earlier this year, Microsoft released day controversial new AI feature
Speaker 1: for PC models. They call it recall. It records everything
Speaker 1: on a user screen and saves them locally on the computer.
Speaker 1: People hated that too. People were freaked out question if
Speaker 1: this saved data was truly localized to your computer or
Speaker 1: is it secretly being shared online? You can bet it is.
Speaker 1: You can bet it is. And if your computer gets sacked, well,
Speaker 1: but I think that they're already sharing it. Which brings
Speaker 1: us to the banks viewpoint based discrimination by banks. There
Speaker 1: are two states that have enacted laws to check this
Speaker 1: kind of behavior by banks. And again it's about enrolling
Speaker 1: all of these different corporations as surrogates for the government.
Speaker 1: I mean, it would be really bad if the government
Speaker 1: were to close your financial bank account, wouldn't it. But
Speaker 1: if the bank does it because Bank of America doesn't
Speaker 1: like you, or yeah, because they value ESG, well that's okay.
Speaker 1: You know, we don't want to get in the way
Speaker 1: of corporations. And you'll have people like the Heritage Foundation,
Speaker 1: the Cato Institute and Reasons say the same thing about
Speaker 1: that as they said about the social media companies that
Speaker 1: were shutting down people's speech. Well, you know, corporations can
Speaker 1: do anything they want. You know, they're equal to you,
Speaker 1: aren't they. No, they're not. Corporations are created by the state. We,
Speaker 1: on the other hand, are created by God. That's the
Speaker 1: fundamental premise of the Decoration of Independence, the foundation of
Speaker 1: this country, that we have rights because we're created by God.
Speaker 1: Corporations have privileges because they're creatures of government. And these
Speaker 1: corporations are not to be superior to humans. But you
Speaker 1: have these you know, the left hand the right. But
Speaker 1: especially when we had this free speech debate, it was
Speaker 1: beyond annoying for me to continue to hear all of
Speaker 1: these different organizations like Cato, Reason, Heritage Foundation saying, well,
Speaker 1: these corporations and they have a right to do whatever
Speaker 1: they wish. No, they don't, especially when they have become
Speaker 1: the de facto digital public square, and when the government
Speaker 1: has given them liability protections. Saying you're not going to
Speaker 1: be responsible for the things that are uploaded. You know,
Speaker 1: they're trying to extradite Kim dot com for that very reason.
Speaker 1: It's like, what you mean people uploaded onto mega upload
Speaker 1: certain content that the government says violated copyright. There we're
Speaker 1: back to copyright again. Oh the basis for censorship? You
Speaker 1: mean people uploaded stuff to their Well, why isn't he
Speaker 1: covered under section two thirty? Is it because he's not American?
Speaker 1: Because he's never lived in America, never had a business
Speaker 1: in America, never worked in America, never visited America. Is
Speaker 1: that why he's not protected under section two thirty. Why
Speaker 1: are they trying to extra dinaom from New Zealand? And
Speaker 1: why is New Zealand acting like a puppet to the
Speaker 1: federal government. That's the real concern anyway. Getting back to
Speaker 1: the banks, real clear markets pushing back against viewpoint based
Speaker 1: discrimination by banks. And as I said, there's two states,
Speaker 1: Florida and Tennessee, which have prohibited this at the state level,
Speaker 1: and the federal government is not happy about this, which
Speaker 1: tells you that it's not coming from the banks. It
Speaker 1: tells you that it's coming from the federal government. Just
Speaker 1: like the censorship came from the federal government. And of
Speaker 1: course you knew that already. You know, you'd have to
Speaker 1: be pretty stupid and dense to not understand that. You'd
Speaker 1: have to just read the New York Times and Washington
Speaker 1: Post exclusively or something on paper. Zulfat Suara and Steve
Speaker 1: Happed don't have much in common. One is a Muslim
Speaker 1: woman who immigrated from the US from Nigeria in the
Speaker 1: nineteen nineties and now is on the Nashville City Council
Speaker 1: because Nashville is like Minneapolis or Austin or something. Nashville
Speaker 1: is horrible in terms of the government that's there. The
Speaker 1: other is a Christian man, a Memphis native with a
Speaker 1: background in software, who began a ministry partnering with Ugandan
Speaker 1: nonprofit charities that care for orphaned and at risk children
Speaker 1: in twenty fifteen. So what do they have in common?
Speaker 1: Both have been canceled by large national banks with little
Speaker 1: warning and virtually no explanation. Suara, who like Happed, is
Speaker 1: also involved in nonprofit work, received a vaguely worded notice
Speaker 1: of cancelation from Regions Bank earlier this year, giving her
Speaker 1: thirty days to find a new bank. Apps cancelation by
Speaker 1: Bank of America came in twenty twenty three, shortly before
Speaker 1: he made a trip overseas, forcing him to scramble for
Speaker 1: solutions and to delay hard earned paychecks to ugandans. His
Speaker 1: notice said that he was operating in the wrong quote
Speaker 1: business type. You got the wrong type of business. We
Speaker 1: don't like what you're doing. You got like some Christian
Speaker 1: charity business here. What's the matter with that? These incidents
Speaker 1: propelled Tennessee lawmakers to adopt a landmark legislative solution aimed
Speaker 1: at curbing this dangerous weaponization of the financial system. Like
Speaker 1: a similar law that recently went into effect in Florida,
Speaker 1: the legislation, the Tennessee legislation was the first of its kind.
Speaker 1: We had some good legislators. I don't know what's going
Speaker 1: to happen after this time. Had a lot of foreign
Speaker 1: money come in, foreign out of state money, let's just
Speaker 1: say some of it foreign. Getting rid of people like
Speaker 1: Frank Nicey who did this type of stuff. Yeah, you
Speaker 1: got to stop the money. Yeah, show me the money, Jerry,
Speaker 1: show me the money, and I'll show you the corruption.
Speaker 1: Like a similar law that recently went into effect in Florida,
Speaker 1: the legislation, as a first of its kind consumer protection
Speaker 1: bill that prohibits big banks from canceling customer accounts based
Speaker 1: on their constitutionally protected speech and religious exercise. The Tennessee
Speaker 1: law applies to banks with at least one hundred million
Speaker 1: dollars in assets, which includes both Regions and Bank of America.
Speaker 1: Bank of America has also been exposed by the US
Speaker 1: House Oversight as working hand in hand with the Department
Speaker 1: of Treasury to profile as domestic terrorist threats. My organization,
Speaker 1: says the writer of this, which is the Alliance Defending Freedom,
Speaker 1: that is a pro Christian free exercise or religion organization.
Speaker 1: And also everyday Americans who commit the sin of shopping
Speaker 1: at bass Pro shops or buying quote religious texts quote unquote,
Speaker 1: should come as no surprise that the Treasure Department has
Speaker 1: now spoken out in opposition to these state level attempts
Speaker 1: to protect the God given freedom is guaranteed by the
Speaker 1: First Amendment because it's coming from the federal it's coming
Speaker 1: from Biden's weaponized Department of Justice, and they can have
Speaker 1: all these government weaponization hearings and anything. Have you seen
Speaker 1: the Republicans do anything. Do they cut the funding. No,
Speaker 1: They're building big new buildings for the FBI. They have
Speaker 1: signed on one hundred percent under Mike Johnson, even more
Speaker 1: so than Kevin McCarthy. They signed on to the expansion
Speaker 1: of the irs to take it, make it seven times
Speaker 1: a big, or to go from a budget of thirteen
Speaker 1: billion dollars a year to a budget of ninety three
Speaker 1: billion dollars. So yeah, they're gonna do all that. But
Speaker 1: the banks that are highly regulated, there's it's not a
Speaker 1: free market if access depends on your political and religious views, right,
Speaker 1: Except politics and religion are always what they screened for
Speaker 1: when they started doing geospatial intelligence in the end of
Speaker 1: the nineteen nineties, as they were weaponizing the Internet as
Speaker 1: well and creating the social media companies and search engine
Speaker 1: companies like Google that were going to be their handmaids.
Speaker 1: As they were doing all this, as their prime objective
Speaker 1: was to look at political and religious views. Oh, well,
Speaker 1: that's to come after the radical Muslims that took down
Speaker 1: the towers on nine to eleven. No, it's to come
Speaker 1: after the patriots. It's like the Patriot Act, to come
Speaker 1: after the Patriots. And as always, geospatial intelligence has always
Speaker 1: been about mapping people's political and religious views. Banks, he
Speaker 1: says are highly regulated. By the way, it's not just
Speaker 1: the list that he had there, it's also the January
Speaker 1: the sixth people. Bank of America was heavily involved in that.
Speaker 1: They claimed that they just did it voluntarily, that they
Speaker 1: weren't asked by the Justice Department or by the FBI.
Speaker 1: They give that information of them, but they whatever whether
Speaker 1: they were asked or not, they did it joyfully, putting
Speaker 1: together lists of people who were in the Washington area.
Speaker 1: And they you know, here's a list of everybody that
Speaker 1: was in there, so go find them and go prosecute
Speaker 1: them just for being in the area. And of course
Speaker 1: they needed to know what their political beliefs were as well,
Speaker 1: because you don't want to go round up a bunch
Speaker 1: of Democrats in Washington.
Speaker 2: D c.
Speaker 1: Jals couldn't hold them all right, But then they wanted
Speaker 1: to also, I guess, to try to figure out where
Speaker 1: their political beliefs were. They looked to see they gave
Speaker 1: them information saying yeah, theyk at a Bank of America
Speaker 1: credit card and they bought guns with it, so you
Speaker 1: know that makes you guilty, I guess. In nineteen ninety eight,
Speaker 1: they said they're highly regulated, but then they get a
Speaker 1: lot of subsidies. In nineteen ninety eight, for example, JP
Speaker 1: Morgan Chase received over one point seven trillion dollars from
Speaker 1: American taxpayers in the form of subsidies. This is not
Speaker 1: the crash that happened a decade later. But look, they've
Speaker 1: also been fined over two billion dollars for criminal activity
Speaker 1: at a minimum. So you know, with one hand, you
Speaker 1: give them two billion dollars and I'm sorry, you give
Speaker 1: them two trillion dollars, and then with the other hand
Speaker 1: you take away two billion. Oh, that's reasonable, right, that's
Speaker 1: the government. Second esg activism and even government regulators are introduced,
Speaker 1: introducing non financial and subjective factors and decision making by
Speaker 1: classifying groups like the Alliance Defending Freedom as domestic terrorist
Speaker 1: threats and denying service to Christian ministries that support orphans
Speaker 1: and widows because they're in the wrong business type. Someone
Speaker 1: should explain how these groups, or how Christian broadcaster Lance
Speaker 1: Wallnow or US Ambassador Sam brown Back present national security threats.
Speaker 1: Of course, one of the features of the state laws
Speaker 1: is that people like Wallnow and Ambassador Brownback can demand
Speaker 1: a written explanation from the banks. Third, the market is
Speaker 1: not free if it doesn't support a free society. And
Speaker 1: if we allow financial services to become politicized, we undermine
Speaker 1: the democratic process and deny businesses the ability to focus
Speaker 1: on why they do best. Well, it's already politicized. It's
Speaker 1: been politicized for quite some time. The Treasury cannot profile
Speaker 1: half of America's domestic terrorists institute or well in financial
Speaker 1: service surveillance and then hide behind the fig leaf of
Speaker 1: national security when the States pushback, Well, yeah, they can't
Speaker 1: because they're doing it, and they've been doing it in
Speaker 1: the open. With the J sixers, they were not stopped.
Speaker 1: And so now they're doing with people like Scott Ritter
Speaker 1: and Tulsi Gabbard, and they're doing it with people by
Speaker 1: debanking them or putting them on a list where they
Speaker 1: have air marshals following around. Tulsa Gabbard. I don't care
Speaker 1: what you think about people's politics. I know all I
Speaker 1: need to know about the politics of this corrupt administration
Speaker 1: when I see that type of thing. And so here's
Speaker 1: the key thing. It does come back to the States,
Speaker 1: doesn't It isn't that really where the things get done.
Speaker 1: At this point in time, they are in a position
Speaker 1: to be a check on this kind of stuff, and
Speaker 1: there really is anything that the FED can do about it,
Speaker 1: especially if the States, even if they were to get
Speaker 1: a Supreme Court decision to agree with the Feds that
Speaker 1: states can't require these banks to be fair and even handed,
Speaker 1: that they can't require the banks to not discriminate based
Speaker 1: on politics, based on religion and other things. Even if
Speaker 1: you had the Supreme Court say yeah, the federal government
Speaker 1: can prohibit fairness, well, the states should just say, well,
Speaker 1: you've made your ruling, let's see you enforce it. States
Speaker 1: like Tennessee and Florida have a critical role to play
Speaker 1: and adopting laws to ensure their citizens' freedoms are protected,
Speaker 1: but also enforcing these laws that no one else has
Speaker 1: to fear financial discrimination because of their religious or political beliefs. Yeah,
Speaker 1: when we look at the impact of this, that is very,
Speaker 1: very important. While we're talking about the JEO spatial intelligence
Speaker 1: and while we're talking about in January the sixth, we
Speaker 1: have just had a court case at the Fifth Circuit
Speaker 1: Court of Appeals. A judge there, James C. Ho Ho,
Speaker 1: has struck a blow against this kind of geofence search
Speaker 1: warrants without a warrant. In other words, they're just warrantless
Speaker 1: searches using geofencing, which is what Make of America did
Speaker 1: on January sixth. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals is
Speaker 1: just determined that geofense searches are not allowed under the Constitution.
Speaker 1: That's not rocket science. It's just reading the document using
Speaker 1: GPS or any other technology that provides authorities with names
Speaker 1: and locations of individuals who were in a particular place
Speaker 1: at a particular time. That's your only crime that you've committed.
Speaker 1: You're in the vicinity of where a crime was committed,
Speaker 1: so now all of your information is sent to the police.
Speaker 1: But in this particular case, it was a robbery, and
Speaker 1: the judge, Judge James Hoe, explained how geofense technology isn't
Speaker 1: allowed in a ruling that now conflicts with another circuit court,
Speaker 1: meaning that a Supreme Court decision is going to be
Speaker 1: more likely. You got two circuit courts that say different
Speaker 1: things about this. One accepts geofense search warrants quote unquote,
Speaker 1: you know it, warrant has to be specific as the person, place,
Speaker 1: and thing looked for in that type of thing. The
Speaker 1: jo offense warrants don't meet that Obviously he said this,
Speaker 1: so he's opposed it. Another circuit court has supported it,
Speaker 1: so that means that it's going to need to go
Speaker 1: to the Supreme Court. Geo offense warrants are powerful tools
Speaker 1: for investigating and deterring crime, said the judge. The defendants
Speaker 1: here engaged in a violent robbery and they likely would
Speaker 1: have gotten away with it except for this GEO offense warrant.
Speaker 1: So I fully recognize that our panel decision today will
Speaker 1: inevitably hamper legitimate law enforcement interests. But hamstringing the government
Speaker 1: is the whole point of our constitution. You see, I've
Speaker 1: said this many times. If you're going to ignore the
Speaker 1: prohibitions on illegal acts via the government, if your only
Speaker 1: concern is to make it easy for law enforcement or
Speaker 1: other government bureaucracies to do their work, then you are
Speaker 1: inviting tyranny. It's not the purpose, and you're also most
Speaker 1: likely going to be creating a criminal institution that has
Speaker 1: the presumed authority but certainly the weight of government. The
Speaker 1: worst possible situation, far worse than letting robbers get away
Speaker 1: with it, is to empower government to be criminal, to
Speaker 1: empower government to terrorize people. That's why you hamstring government.
Speaker 1: So it says, I understand that. But he says, hamstringing
Speaker 1: the government is the whole point of our constitution. Our
Speaker 1: founders recognize that the government will not always be comprised
Speaker 1: of publicly spirited officers, and that even good faith actors
Speaker 1: can be overcome by the zealous pursuit of legitimate public interests.
Speaker 1: And then he quotes Ferteralist number fifty one. If men
Speaker 1: were angels, no government would be necessary, and if angels
Speaker 1: were to government, neither external nor internal controls on government
Speaker 1: would be necessary. But experiences taught mankind the necessity of
Speaker 1: auxiliary precautions. It is because of human nature that it
Speaker 1: is necessary to control the abuses of government. And so
Speaker 1: the ruling says, this court cannot forgive the requirements of
Speaker 1: the Fourth Amendment. In other words, we cannot ignore it.
Speaker 1: How many times have you seen the Supreme Court ignore
Speaker 1: the Constitution, especially the Fourth Amendment. Scalia that everybody looks
Speaker 1: at is, Oh, he's a textualist, he's an originalist. He
Speaker 1: wants to go with what the text says. He just
Speaker 1: swept aside the Fourth Amendment when it came to the
Speaker 1: TSA doing general searches on everybody that goes to an airport. Oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's fine. We had to make it easy for the
Speaker 1: government to find terrorists. And guess what, there are no
Speaker 1: terrorist threats against the airport's aeroplanes. The TSA admitted that
Speaker 1: in a twenty eleven document at the same time, they
Speaker 1: were threatening to shut down Texas all flights in and
Speaker 1: out of Texas if they stopped them from doing naked
Speaker 1: body scans and padding down kids. Yeah, so this court
Speaker 1: cannot forgive the requirements of the Fourth Amendment in the
Speaker 1: name of law enforcement. We hold that geofens warrants are
Speaker 1: general warrants that are categorically prohibited by the Fourth Amendment.
Speaker 1: The case involved three Mississippi men convicted of a twenty
Speaker 1: eighteen armed robbery, and this ruling said, even though geofense
Speaker 1: warrants are unconstitutional, the convicts were not allowed to suppress
Speaker 1: evidence because law enforcement acted in good faith and relying
Speaker 1: on this type of warrant. Well. The Electronic Frontier Foundation
Speaker 1: says this is a major change. They applaud the decision.
Speaker 1: It is essential, they said that every person feel like
Speaker 1: they can simply take their cell phone out into the
Speaker 1: world without the fear that they might end up a
Speaker 1: criminal suspect because their location data was swept up in
Speaker 1: an open ended digital dragnet. And again, this has happened
Speaker 1: many times. January sixth is one of the best examples
Speaker 1: of it. But they've had other situations for people who
Speaker 1: have been swept up into a criminal investigation simply because
Speaker 1: they were in an area of where they did a
Speaker 1: big dragnet Google. In the process, Google determines which accounts
Speaker 1: Google databases is turning the stuff over with searches as well. Right,
Speaker 1: so the phone companies are doing it, Google is doing it,
Speaker 1: the banks are doing it, the United Stazi of America.
Speaker 1: That's what USA means now. Right, Google determines which accounts
Speaker 1: were within the defined boundaries, and it gives law enforcement
Speaker 1: an anonymized list of suspects. But then of course they
Speaker 1: can ask for more information about that. So maybe this
Speaker 1: is they need Google's help a little bit more. Maybe
Speaker 1: that's what this antitrust stuff is really about, Julie Kelly said. So,
Speaker 1: when Google conducts a geofens search, every cell phone user
Speaker 1: is included in the initial batch. The term sensor vault
Speaker 1: refers to Google's entire location history database. How is this
Speaker 1: possibly constitutional and where this all began. Again, if we
Speaker 1: go back to the mid twentieth century and right after
Speaker 1: World War Two, the CIA is created. Truman creates the
Speaker 1: NSA with an executive order. It's not even created by Congress.
Speaker 1: And then by the early seventies they realized, hey, wait
Speaker 1: a minute, CIA and the NSA are spying on Americans
Speaker 1: without search warrants. They're listening to people's phones and doing
Speaker 1: other things like that. And the courts excused it. They said, well,
Speaker 1: you know, even though the phone company is a monopoly,
Speaker 1: government creative monopoly, a government creative monopoly. Even though they're
Speaker 1: a monopoly, they can do whatever they want if it's
Speaker 1: their data. If you're doing business with the phone company,
Speaker 1: it's their data, and they can turn it over to
Speaker 1: you and there's nothing to be said about it. And
Speaker 1: the courts went along with that lie. And so, you know,
Speaker 1: even though they came up with the fis of court,
Speaker 1: which then they turned around and said, well, that's going
Speaker 1: to be our search warrant. We'll get permission from one judge.
Speaker 1: We'll call that a phisi court, and that'll allow us
Speaker 1: to spy on mister missus Verizon. But that's been the
Speaker 1: essence of it all along the idea that they can
Speaker 1: work with corporations. It's always this corporate fascist partnership right
Speaker 1: with government. The corporations are doing this, and if they
Speaker 1: want to that data belongs to them, even if it's
Speaker 1: a government creative monopoly, that data belongs to them. And
Speaker 1: if AT and T or Google wants to turn that
Speaker 1: information voluntarily over to the government or Bank of America,
Speaker 1: well that's Bank of America's data, maybe data that they
Speaker 1: collected about you. But they can do with it whatever
Speaker 1: they want, if they want to give it to the government,
Speaker 1: if they want to sell it to the government. The
Speaker 1: courts say that's okay. And so this is a very
Speaker 1: important decision. That's why Eff Electronic Freedom Foundation said, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's important. Jeff Clark, the Fifth Circuit is right. This
Speaker 1: is another dagger to j six Conventions. Since many of
Speaker 1: the defendants were identified via Geo Finci. Well, absolutely right.
Speaker 1: We're going to take a quick break and when we
Speaker 1: come back, we're going to take a look at Elon
Speaker 1: Musk and JK. Rowling and the man who beat up
Speaker 1: Pointman in the Olympics. He's now assuing them. We'll be
Speaker 1: right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: Who would have thought that one of the defining questions
Speaker 1: of the idiotic times in which we live is what
Speaker 1: is a woman? It's kind of a rhetorical takedown. When
Speaker 1: it was Senator Marsha Blackburn from Tennessee, I think it
Speaker 1: wasn't it in the Brown Jackson confirmation hearings. I think
Speaker 1: she said that, well, I don't really know what a
Speaker 1: woman is. Well, evidently nobody knows what a woman is.
Speaker 1: Can't be biological. Of course, it can't be, because you
Speaker 1: have X Y chromosomes, and that's really the issue with
Speaker 1: this Olympic boxer. Evidently there's been no specifics about it.
Speaker 1: I imagine there will be specifics about it now because
Speaker 1: this Algerian boxer who beat up women and won a
Speaker 1: gold medal for doing it as now suing Elon Musk
Speaker 1: and JK Rowling. If guilty, they could be given a
Speaker 1: five year prison sentence and a fine of up to
Speaker 1: two hundred and fourteen thousand pounds. And so I don't know,
Speaker 1: maybe that's somewhere between two hundred fifty thous three hundred
Speaker 1: thousand dollars. If Olympic boxer from Algeria wins the criminal
Speaker 1: cyber bullying case. And this is in France. Of course,
Speaker 1: we've already seen what French values are in the Olympics,
Speaker 1: haven't we. So this is the tatalitarian EU, especially France,
Speaker 1: pretending to have compassion for this guy pretending to be
Speaker 1: a woman, and as they point out, it's not a
Speaker 1: transgender woman. I mean, there is a biological aspect of this.
Speaker 1: And what they say is that they've hinted that perhaps
Speaker 1: there is something wrong with the genitalia of this guy.
Speaker 1: And the Taiwanese boxer, which by the way, we're not
Speaker 1: allowed to call him Taiwanese. They have a different phrase
Speaker 1: forty us from Taiwan. But we have to bow to
Speaker 1: political correctness with the Chinese Communist Party and not say
Speaker 1: that he is Taiwanese even though he is. It's a
Speaker 1: Taiwanese man boxing woman can't say that. But the Algerian
Speaker 1: he also won a gold medal in his weight class.
Speaker 1: And as I said before, why do we have different
Speaker 1: weight classes? When are they going to stop assigning these
Speaker 1: weight numbers to people? You know, I mean it's a scale, right,
Speaker 1: We shouldn't wait these people anymore. We shouldn't have different
Speaker 1: boxing classes. Let's let the featherweights box the heavyweights. That's
Speaker 1: why you have men and women. That's why you have
Speaker 1: different weight classes. That's why you have a handicap number
Speaker 1: that is assigned with golfing. I don't understand how that works.
Speaker 1: I don't play golf. But that's to try to level
Speaker 1: the playing field and so, but we don't want to
Speaker 1: do that. But evidently there may be something wrong with
Speaker 1: their genitalia, but the chromosomes or x Y, which means
Speaker 1: that this would be a doping issue. Right, Are you
Speaker 1: allowed to take steroids and compete in these things? Are
Speaker 1: you allowed to dope it up with x Y stuff?
Speaker 1: Well no, so it makes sense. But again getting back
Speaker 1: to the original stuff, here's my question. I don't hear
Speaker 1: anybody saying this. Let me go full male chauvinist and say,
Speaker 1: I don't understand why anybody wants to watch women boxing,
Speaker 1: even if they're really two women boxing. I mean, I
Speaker 1: don't want to see that. What's going on with our society.
Speaker 1: That's sick in and of itself. It's even sicker when
Speaker 1: you have men boxing women. The whole thing is pathetic. Anyway,
Speaker 1: this trial I'm sure will be as detached from reality
Speaker 1: as the Olympics were. We'll see what kind of details
Speaker 1: come out in it. But as Naomi Wolf said in
Speaker 1: her book two thousand and seven, she wrote this The
Speaker 1: End of America, A Letter of Warning to a young Patriot.
Speaker 1: Naomi Wolf said, all dictators invoke an external and internal threat.
Speaker 1: They develop a paramilitary force, They create a secret prison system.
Speaker 1: They surveill ordinary citizens, they arbitrarily detain and release them.
Speaker 1: They harass citizens groups, They target writers, entertainers, other key
Speaker 1: individuals for dissenting. They intimidate the press, they recast dissent
Speaker 1: as treason and criticism as espionage, and eventually they subvert
Speaker 1: the rule of law. Well, we have done all of that,
Speaker 1: and all that was done under the Trump administration as
Speaker 1: well as the Biden administration. The Biden administration has just
Speaker 1: taking it to the next step. It goes back and forth.
Speaker 1: And so that was quoted by the UK news site
Speaker 1: expos News to talk about what is happening in the UK.
Speaker 1: I think it's the way they characterize it is exactly right.
Speaker 1: The instant authoritarianism of two tier tier starmer. Yeah, two tier,
Speaker 1: double standard, two face, two face starmer, in his labor government.
Speaker 1: But it was they did go instantly authoritarian, except then
Speaker 1: understand that all of the tools were laid out for them,
Speaker 1: everything that they needed was left on the desk when
Speaker 1: the Conservative Party left. Conservative Party had been creating all
Speaker 1: the weapons, just as Trump created the JAB weapons and
Speaker 1: then left them there for Biden to do the next step.
Speaker 1: But of course Trump had already signed on to do
Speaker 1: the next step twenty nineteen, he was supporting very vociferously
Speaker 1: the mandates for measles shots, the MMR stuff, against any
Speaker 1: religious or medical exemptions. He had already, as Jason Barker's
Speaker 1: pointed out many times as well, he had already said
Speaker 1: that as soon as the FDA gave us rubber stamp
Speaker 1: to these things, that it was going to be mandated.
Speaker 1: And I said in December twenty twenty publicly on public records,
Speaker 1: saying that's going to happen in September of two thousand
Speaker 1: and one. Why well, because that's when school is going
Speaker 1: to start, and it gives them some time to get
Speaker 1: people accustomed to the idea. But again, the instant authoritarianism
Speaker 1: of two tier tier Starmer's labor government, which decided to
Speaker 1: use civil unrest as a result of the gut wrenching
Speaker 1: massacre of three kids, three very young children, with a
Speaker 1: knife wielding man to advance a long term, planned criminalized
Speaker 1: controversial speech, to control social media giants, to police the Internet,
Speaker 1: and a manner considered to be unthinkable and virtually all
Speaker 1: modern Western democracies. And that's even in modern democracies, certainly
Speaker 1: in democracies that would have been around a century ago.
Speaker 1: And then that brings us to kem dot com. He
Speaker 1: has just lost a trial in New Zealand for extradition.
Speaker 1: He has been fighting this for twelve years. The FBI
Speaker 1: demanded that he be extradited. The FBI had ordered a
Speaker 1: raid on his mansion in Auckland, New Zealand. Isn't that interesting?
Speaker 1: The FBI is ordering the New Zealand government to do it.
Speaker 1: The New Zealand government puppets as they are of the
Speaker 1: global governance, and we are the center of the global governance,
Speaker 1: make no doubt about it. And we like to pretend
Speaker 1: that it's it's not us, it's the WHO, or it's Davos. No,
Speaker 1: we are the un We are the major funders of
Speaker 1: these things, US headquartered corporations. Anyway, the FBI told the
Speaker 1: New Zealand government to raid his home in New Zealand,
Speaker 1: and they did, and he's been fighting extradition for twelve years.
Speaker 1: In twenty seventeen, the High Court in New Zealand first
Speaker 1: approved his extradition, with an appeal court reaffirming the finding.
Speaker 1: In twenty eighteen and twenty twenty, the country's Supreme Court
Speaker 1: again affirmed the finding. However, they left the door open
Speaker 1: for further judicial review. And so now a judge has
Speaker 1: jumped in on that yet again. How many times and
Speaker 1: how many different courts is New Zealand going to surrender
Speaker 1: its sovereignty to the US government. They're part of the
Speaker 1: Five Eyes network, the five English speaking countries of the US, UK, Canada,
Speaker 1: New Zealand Australia. He said I love New Zealand put
Speaker 1: out on Twitter. I love New Zealand. I'm not leaving.
Speaker 1: And he says, I don't worry. I have a plan. Well,
Speaker 1: I hope he does. But as I said before, and
Speaker 1: as he's pointed out, he's never lived in the USA,
Speaker 1: he's never worked in the USA, he's never owned a
Speaker 1: business in the USA, he's never even visited the USA.
Speaker 1: What authority do they have against him, and what are
Speaker 1: the accusations. Oh, well, people used his site mega upload
Speaker 1: to upload copyrighted material. Isn't that what YouTube is all about?
Speaker 1: You know? Come on anyway, that's that's really their business model.
Speaker 1: According to US authorities, Kim dot Com and three other
Speaker 1: Mega Upload executives cost film Studios over a half a
Speaker 1: billion dollars by encouraging people to store and share copyrighted material.
Speaker 1: They just made that up where they do a PCR
Speaker 1: test on the copyrighting material. That's about as accurate, generating
Speaker 1: over one hundred and seventy five million dollars for his website.
Speaker 1: He also faces charges of money laundering and racketeering. And
Speaker 1: again he's racketeering charges really meaningless, you know, as a
Speaker 1: way to get around due process, and people like Rudy Giuliani,
Speaker 1: we're more than happy to build their career on it.
Speaker 1: Eventually it comes around and bites him. He's now being
Speaker 1: charged with racketeering. When it comes to money laundering, what
Speaker 1: does that mean? They came after the Republican Speaker of
Speaker 1: the House, longest serving Speaker of the House, who had
Speaker 1: been handpicked because he had been a wrestling coach, and
Speaker 1: I think it was known before they ran him for
Speaker 1: Congress as a Republican. Dennis Astard, I think it was
Speaker 1: known that he was a pedophile. One of these people
Speaker 1: that he had victimized as a coach. Wait a minute,
Speaker 1: I know somebody else. It's a coach who's running for
Speaker 1: office right now, Tim Wallas. He hangs around with some
Speaker 1: pretty dodgy characters too, not even trying to hide it.
Speaker 1: I mean, Dennis aster looked like he was a real
Speaker 1: conservative guy. And you know, they have a statute of limitations.
Speaker 1: They wouldn't change his statute of limitations. They could have
Speaker 1: come after him for the real crime of pedophilia. Instead,
Speaker 1: they came after him for a non crime of structuring
Speaker 1: his money. So the banquetn't ask him about it. But
Speaker 1: it was money that he took out. He had already
Speaker 1: paid taxes on it. What business is it of theirs
Speaker 1: or the government about that? But they sent him to
Speaker 1: jail for that, you know, that kind of money laundering.
Speaker 1: I imagine it's what they're after with kim dot com.
Speaker 1: New Zealand copyright law makes it clear that an ISP
Speaker 1: can't be criminally liable for the actions of their users.
Speaker 1: Kim dot com noted in twenty seventeen, he said, unless,
Speaker 1: of course you're Kim dot com, and then they will
Speaker 1: ignore that law. New Zealand Copyright Law ninety two B
Speaker 1: makes it clear that an ISP can't be criminally liable
Speaker 1: fractions of their users. And as a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: like I said before, you look at section two thirty
Speaker 1: in the United States, Well that was supposed to protect
Speaker 1: these sites from what people would upload if they're a
Speaker 1: public site. You know, because if you're going to knock
Speaker 1: them to any time somebody puts up something that was criminal,
Speaker 1: and you're going to take down Google, or you're going
Speaker 1: to take down Facebook or Twitter or whatever because somebody
Speaker 1: puts up something that is let's say, you know there's
Speaker 1: child porn or something right they posted up there, Well
Speaker 1: we're going to take down the whole site instead of
Speaker 1: going after the person who posted that. They put up
Speaker 1: section two thirty to protect against that. Or you're not
Speaker 1: going to have any Internet sites. Mega upload was based
Speaker 1: in Hong Kong until twenty twelve, when the US seized
Speaker 1: the domain and shuttered the site. Then it relaunched the
Speaker 1: next year as Mega with a new Zealand domain name. However,
Speaker 1: dot com has had no involvement with the company since
Speaker 1: at least twenty fifteen. The company's chief marketing officer and
Speaker 1: chief technical officer and both from Germany, along with a
Speaker 1: third executive, were arrested along in Auckland along with Keem
Speaker 1: dot Com in twenty twelve. One of them died in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two. One of the other three people died
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty two. The other two were send it
Speaker 1: to jail in New Zealand, and they did plea bargains
Speaker 1: that helped them to avoid extradition, and so I guess
Speaker 1: they turned against kim dot Com. So the other three executives.
Speaker 1: One of them died, the other two worked out a
Speaker 1: plea deal. Elon Musk commented on it and said, the
Speaker 1: decision to extradite you is a blow to justice. Musk
Speaker 1: is right about this. You fought against unfair persecution for
Speaker 1: over a decade. The US wants to scapegoat you for
Speaker 1: issues they couldn't control. New Zealand should protect you, not
Speaker 1: serve as a proxy for US overreach. He's exactly right
Speaker 1: about that. It is truly disgusting what is being done.
Speaker 1: I mean again, not a citizen not doing business in
Speaker 1: the United States, they've got Section two thirty. New Zealand
Speaker 1: has got laws against that. So but of course, just
Speaker 1: look at Julian Sounge. They had no authorization to come
Speaker 1: after him either. He wasn't an American citizen. On Rumble
Speaker 1: Audi Modern Retro Radio, thank you very much. I appreciate
Speaker 1: it's very generous. Good morning, David. Thanks for keeping up
Speaker 1: the good fight. Thank you very much. We're going to
Speaker 1: take a quick break, and when we come back, I
Speaker 1: got a quick update with some pharma news, so stay
Speaker 1: with us. We'll be right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: By the way, that reminded me. I got an email,
Speaker 1: very nice email, very kind, and from Sue who said
Speaker 1: you really liked the music, and she was anxious to
Speaker 1: get the Christmas album when it's time again. I'm hoping
Speaker 1: that I'll have time to do some new songs this
Speaker 1: year too. Maybe we'll have a follow up Christmas album
Speaker 1: this year, but time will tell. Time will tell. But
Speaker 1: she asked if I would sell some of these things.
Speaker 1: I hadn't thought about doing that. Maybe I would. I
Speaker 1: could do some more actually of those, but thank you
Speaker 1: very much. And she asked about that particular one and
Speaker 1: by the way, that is palladio by a composer, contemporary composer.
Speaker 1: He's still alive. Carl Jenkins very famous in the UK
Speaker 1: and his work has been using a lot of different things.
Speaker 1: That was used I believe. I think it was after
Speaker 1: we stopped watching TV, but I think they had it
Speaker 1: in a Diamond commercial and that's Palladio by Carl Jenkins.
Speaker 1: That's my cover of it. I saw a little bit
Speaker 1: about pharma, medical warfare, that's what it's called. My Children's
Speaker 1: Health Defense has a couple of doctors who questioned the
Speaker 1: Trump mRNA shots and who also promoted ivermectin and HCQ
Speaker 1: to help people with their respiratory issues. And I got
Speaker 1: to say, you know, regardless of what's going on with it,
Speaker 1: I know someone who is very, very sick with pneumonia
Speaker 1: and he took iver mecton immediately made a big difference
Speaker 1: with him. So I don't know what the mechanism is there.
Speaker 1: As we talked the other day with Samantha and her
Speaker 1: husband Bailey, both of them medical doctors out of New Zealand,
Speaker 1: and they talked about it, I'd never heard of this.
Speaker 1: The common Coal unit that ran for fifty years in
Speaker 1: the UK to trying to figure out how coals are transmitted.
Speaker 1: They would collect it's not spit and give it to
Speaker 1: other people. I mean, it's disgusting reasonime thinking about it.
Speaker 1: But other than that, it was kind of like a
Speaker 1: two week vacation where they would spray you with, you know,
Speaker 1: sneezes and things like that to see if people get sick.
Speaker 1: And they could never figure out anything. They could never
Speaker 1: trace any of this stuff. In terms of coal viruses.
Speaker 1: They did postulate a rhinovirus meaning a nose a nose virus,
Speaker 1: and sars and other things like that, but they never
Speaker 1: really add no virus. They never isolated any of these things.
Speaker 1: It really does make you scratch your head and question
Speaker 1: all this stuff. But regardless of all that, I mean
Speaker 1: still I've remaked people who were helped by that. The
Speaker 1: bottom of mine is that the governments should stay out
Speaker 1: of our health care, shouldn't they. I mean, isn't that
Speaker 1: what La La and Biden and all these pro abortion
Speaker 1: people are saying, My health decisions should be between me and
Speaker 1: my doctor. Well, no, that's only if you want to
Speaker 1: make a decision to kill your child. Any other health
Speaker 1: decisions they are going to be right there in the middle,
Speaker 1: and if you and your doctor decide that you want
Speaker 1: to do something, they will prohibit it. They'll take the
Speaker 1: license of the doctor, or they'll take the license of
Speaker 1: the pharmacut of the pharmacists who fill the prescriptions. And
Speaker 1: so now they have. The American Board of Internal Medicine
Speaker 1: last week revoked the certifications of doctors Pierre Corey and
Speaker 1: Paul Merrick following a two year investigation in to them
Speaker 1: promoting ivermectin and hydroxychloroquin. And just to put this in perspective,
Speaker 1: these are both drugs that were approved by the FDA.
Speaker 1: They were approved for other things that they said that
Speaker 1: they had tested them for. And whenever you take an
Speaker 1: approved drug and you use it for a different condition
Speaker 1: that has not been evaluated as to whether or not
Speaker 1: it is effective for that condition, that has always been allowed.
Speaker 1: That's called off label use of an authorized drug. For
Speaker 1: sixty seventy years, a droxy corroquin ivermectin have been used
Speaker 1: for several different things, and so there's safety supposedly has
Speaker 1: been evaluated. If it wasn't evaluated by the FDA, it's
Speaker 1: people pretty much know the safety profile after sixty or
Speaker 1: seventy years of it. And so if you know the
Speaker 1: safety profile of this, if you want to try it
Speaker 1: to see if it's effective for some other condition that's
Speaker 1: just called off label use, why would you criminalize that. Well,
Speaker 1: because they want to make sure that everybody gets a vaccine.
Speaker 1: That was the thing that was a dead giveaway. Two
Speaker 1: doctors who spoke about the vaccines and alternative treatments received
Speaker 1: notice their medical certifications were evoked, while another doctor said
Speaker 1: her certification was revoked without her knowledge. The American Board
Speaker 1: of Internal Medicine last week revoked the certifications of doctors
Speaker 1: Pierre Corey and Paul Merrick following me to year investigation
Speaker 1: and promotion of iramctin and droxy color quin. They're both
Speaker 1: co founders of the Frontline COVID nineteen Critical Care Alliance,
Speaker 1: which promotes alternative treatments for COVID nineteen. Again, if we're
Speaker 1: going to allow these trade organizations to operate as gills
Speaker 1: and to be able to shut people down, if we're
Speaker 1: going to allow the public health people to say, we
Speaker 1: don't care about your informed consent, and we don't care
Speaker 1: about you, We're going to tell you what you can
Speaker 1: and cannot have, and so Armageddon Pros wrote this op
Speaker 1: ed piece about the death of Susan Wojiki, the YouTube
Speaker 1: executive who died of cancer. They've been fighting it for
Speaker 1: two years twenty twenty two. The headline from Armageddon pro says,
Speaker 1: shall we toll the bells for a dead vax deatalitarian?
Speaker 1: Susan Wojiki was one of the most hardcore censors of
Speaker 1: truthful COVID nineteen information throughout the pandemic, censoring anything critical
Speaker 1: of the so called vaccines, anything speculating that COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: originated from a Chinese lab receiving government funding funneled by
Speaker 1: FAUCI through Eco Health Alliance. And of course, now just
Speaker 1: like the masks, they have flipped that narrative. Now you
Speaker 1: really they really support that. They support the whole lab
Speaker 1: leak thing because they want you to believe that the
Speaker 1: pandemic was real. They will support anything, and it's a
Speaker 1: very convenient thing to blame it on China too, So yeah,
Speaker 1: blame it on China and tell everybody that it was real.
Speaker 1: I do not support the lab liak idea. I do
Speaker 1: not believe that at all. I don't believe this gain
Speaker 1: of function stuff, and I opposed it. I've been opposing
Speaker 1: it for four years now, over four years, MPR said.
Speaker 1: Susan Wojiki, a Silicon Valley visionary who helped shape Google
Speaker 1: and YouTube, died Friday after a two year battle with
Speaker 1: non small cell lung cancer. She oversaw the platform as
Speaker 1: it grappled with hate speech, misinformation, and inappropriate content. As
Speaker 1: I said before I got censored, before she became CEO
Speaker 1: of YouTube. She became CEO in twenty fourteen. They were
Speaker 1: censoring me in December twenty thirteen for the Federal Reserve video,
Speaker 1: claiming copyright infringement again, Business Insider I said. In March
Speaker 1: twenty twenty, they said YouTube's Susan Jiki has suggested that
Speaker 1: the video platform will remove content that contradicts the Who's
Speaker 1: advice on COVID nineteen. In an interview with CNN, she
Speaker 1: said YouTube will be removing information that is problematic, meaning
Speaker 1: anything that is medically unsubstantiated, you know, like treatment for
Speaker 1: her cancer. Just how many lives have been lost directly
Speaker 1: due to Wajiki's brutal censorship, presum how many people might
Speaker 1: have gained access to information about the stuff that is
Speaker 1: killing people. The ventilators, the m dezevir, other things like that. So,
Speaker 1: how many terrified parents cloistered their children at home, setting
Speaker 1: back their psychological and mental development for years, perhaps never
Speaker 1: to be recovered. How many schools remain locked down for
Speaker 1: years on end, depriving children of social interaction and working
Speaker 1: parents of the means to support their children and work
Speaker 1: at the same time. That's right, any businesses? How much?
Speaker 1: How many people lost their lives work? How many people
Speaker 1: lost their lives? And would this article say the same
Speaker 1: thing about Trump because he's even more culpable than a
Speaker 1: YouTube executive. No, No, not going to say that about Trump.
Speaker 1: Not going to say it about Trump. They will give
Speaker 1: Trump a pass. Trump wasn't there. I don't know. He
Speaker 1: just like disappeared from Earth for an entire year all
Speaker 1: a twenty twenty. He just wasn't around. I don't know
Speaker 1: what he was doing. Non sell, non small sell lung cancer.
Speaker 1: That's an odd thing. Non small. It's not big, but
Speaker 1: it's non small anyway. That form of lung cancer is
Speaker 1: a rare, fast growing lung cancer that can't affect anyone,
Speaker 1: but it typically sets in those they have a long
Speaker 1: history of smoking tobacco. Did she smoke, Well, there's no
Speaker 1: indication that she did, and I would say, based on
Speaker 1: you know, the kind of profile social profile that she
Speaker 1: was keeping, out would say very very likely, not that
Speaker 1: she was a smoker. So where did she get it?
Speaker 1: Was it the COVID nineteen shots. Microbiologist Kevin McKernon and
Speaker 1: his team recently discovered SV forty that's semion virus forty
Speaker 1: promoters and Pfizer and Moderna's mRNA shots. So this is
Speaker 1: and of course they don't mention it in this article,
Speaker 1: but pathologist doctor Ryan Cole said in the spring of
Speaker 1: twenty twenty, twenty twenty one, as he's looking at the people,
Speaker 1: some of the people have been vaccinating. He goes, all
Speaker 1: these people have been vaccinated, they've got a very very
Speaker 1: low killer T cell count. Killer T cell is going
Speaker 1: to be one of your bodies lines the main line
Speaker 1: of events against cancer. So I think we're to see
Speaker 1: a lot more cancer, and we're going to see it
Speaker 1: advancing a lot more quickly, so equally troubling. These DNA
Speaker 1: contaminants can also alter the human genome. Statistically significant increases
Speaker 1: and age adjusted mortality rates of all cancers were observed
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty two, after two thirds of the Japanese
Speaker 1: population had received the third or later dose of these
Speaker 1: trump shots. A study by Pfizer proves that the mRNA
Speaker 1: vaccination during pregnancy is highly likely to cause abortion. But
Speaker 1: they have covered this up. The health officials have moved
Speaker 1: on in both the US and the UK. They knew,
Speaker 1: but they chose not to talk about it. Well, we're
Speaker 1: going to take a quick break and we'll come back.
Speaker 1: We're going to talk about the people, excuse me, people
Speaker 1: who are trying to make it a moral imperative for
Speaker 1: you to vote for one of these candidates or the other.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back.
Speaker 2: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 2: revolutionary act. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: Before we get into uh, these this discussion about uh,
Speaker 1: the imperatives that are being put on people to support
Speaker 1: one candid and it's going to only get worse as
Speaker 1: we get closer. You know, we're now probably what between
Speaker 1: ninety and one hundred days out from the election, and
Speaker 1: it is really going to ramp up and everybody is
Speaker 1: going to feel the fear, aren't they. So I want
Speaker 1: to talk to you about that. But before I do.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about what is happening to food. That's a
Speaker 1: big part of the election, isn't it. You know, you
Speaker 1: La La Harris out there said food is rents just
Speaker 1: too damn high. I remember that guy from New York
Speaker 1: City was running for office. That was his campaign slogan. Well,
Speaker 1: she's basically vamping on that, except its food is too high.
Speaker 1: That is the only problem, because people know on a
Speaker 1: regular basis, they see how expensive food is. And of
Speaker 1: course one of the reasons that it's expensive is because
Speaker 1: they are trying to constrict our supply with a mass
Speaker 1: culling of animals that they're doing. There are some root
Speaker 1: causes for that, but of course the ultimate root cause
Speaker 1: is the money printing and the spending of the food government.
Speaker 1: But you can create these increases here as they are
Speaker 1: attacking the food supply. Let's talk a little bit about
Speaker 1: Patriot Be Best and you find them at Patriotbebest dot com.
Speaker 1: The natural food chain and bees are absolutely essential to that.
Speaker 1: What can you learn to help support that? You know, really,
Speaker 1: all politics is local, and ultimately food supply is going
Speaker 1: to be local as well, isn't it. Well, the good
Speaker 1: people at Patriot be Best have done extensive research and
Speaker 1: study about this important issue. They've created an educational online
Speaker 1: digest to help spread the word about the challenges facing
Speaker 1: the American bee and educating American patriots to engage as advocates,
Speaker 1: to inform others, and to band together to help solve
Speaker 1: this problem. Patriot be Best is a digital be sanctuary
Speaker 1: for education, engagement, and real change. These people know bees
Speaker 1: and Patriot be Best is laser focused on restoration and
Speaker 1: preservation of the American bee population. You can learn about
Speaker 1: how the honeybee benefits all of us. You can discover
Speaker 1: be friendly initiatives and other helpful resources. At the Worker
Speaker 1: be subscription level of their publication Buzz, you get educational information,
Speaker 1: advocacy opportunities, be friendly products, b rescue activities, and more.
Speaker 1: If you go to the Queen Bee subscription level, you'll
Speaker 1: get access to bonus content on patriotic topics related to
Speaker 1: restoring and reinforcing American values. Join to learn about restoring
Speaker 1: the health of the American bee population. Check them out
Speaker 1: at Patriotbebest dot com to subscribe and to see all
Speaker 1: the cool b related products they have to offer. Patriot
Speaker 1: b Best is the destination for all things American b
Speaker 1: They have a video link there at their website patriotbbest
Speaker 1: dot com. Why is our American bee population under attack? Well,
Speaker 1: there's a on some obvious answers as to wire food
Speaker 1: supplies under tack and this is something you can actually
Speaker 1: do about it. Again patriotbebeest dot com. Well, as we
Speaker 1: look at the beginning of the school year, which is
Speaker 1: really amazing to us. School used to not start until
Speaker 1: September when we were kids. Now they started keep moving
Speaker 1: it earlier and earlier. Some of them were starting to
Speaker 1: talk about doing it back in July. But we have
Speaker 1: new medal detectors delaying students first day of school in
Speaker 1: Broward County. Remember Broward County. Remember the Coward of Broward County,
Speaker 1: the school defense officer with the uniform and a gun
Speaker 1: who hit out while the school was being shot at it.
Speaker 1: People began to talk about, Hey, you know what we
Speaker 1: need is armed teachers. Well they didn't get that. Instead,
Speaker 1: what they got was metal detectors and a disorganized rollout
Speaker 1: of new metal detectors. They kept students waiting in long
Speaker 1: lines late to class the first day and all the
Speaker 1: rest of stuff. They roll these things out at thirty
Speaker 1: eight different schools. So each of the schools, each of
Speaker 1: the high schools were participating in this and each of
Speaker 1: them had big, big issues. Schools are trying to ban
Speaker 1: in some jurisdictions. In El Paso, Texas, they said, you know,
Speaker 1: we got we've got a real character problem here. You know,
Speaker 1: I think I know what the issue is. I think
Speaker 1: it's black clothing. We got to ban black clothing. These
Speaker 1: people can't. So that means that Johnny Cash could never
Speaker 1: go to that if if he hadn't passed away, he
Speaker 1: could not attend that school even in a concert. Because
Speaker 1: they are now against they kind of ban all black attire.
Speaker 1: It's now on hold. L Passo Middle School a new
Speaker 1: dress code policy that borrows students from wearing all black
Speaker 1: from head to toe. They have sent out a letter
Speaker 1: saying they're prohibiting all black attire due to its association
Speaker 1: with depression and mental health issues and or criminality. You know,
Speaker 1: I don't think it's the black clothing. I think it's
Speaker 1: the government institutions that we call school that is causing
Speaker 1: all of that kind of stuff. And on the New
Speaker 1: American Alex Newman and I really I wrote, like Alex
Speaker 1: I've had him on several times. He's written a book
Speaker 1: about the roots of corruption in the American school system
Speaker 1: going back to the early eighteen hundreds of the people
Speaker 1: and the philosophies behind all of this. And he's got
Speaker 1: an article on The New American the occult spirituality and
Speaker 1: values manipulation injected in schools by the UN. And so
Speaker 1: you know, it's not the black clothing. It's kind of
Speaker 1: the occult spirituality, isn't it. The UN is injecting a
Speaker 1: cult spirituality as part in the guise of social emotional learning.
Speaker 1: And indeed, he says many of the ring leaders of
Speaker 1: this movement openly claimed to be speaking with the dead,
Speaker 1: with ascended masters or spirits. Oh wait a minute, I
Speaker 1: know somebody who was leading prayers to ascended masters. He's
Speaker 1: doing it in churches with a big political meeting there. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that was General Flynn leading prayers to ascended masters. Anything,
Speaker 1: and Alex says, anything to do with this. This is
Speaker 1: on the New American. But The New American had an
Speaker 1: interview they did with Michael Flynn up for over a month.
Speaker 1: They did an interview with him and they featured it
Speaker 1: at the top of their website for over a month,
Speaker 1: this guy who was leading occultic prayers to Ascended Masters. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so it's everywhere, isn't it. Many are actually Communist party
Speaker 1: leaders and population controls zelots in the schools. Absolutely true,
Speaker 1: Absolutely true. So get your kids out of these schools
Speaker 1: and get your kids out of get your kids out
Speaker 1: of the Maga clubs as well. That'd be very important
Speaker 1: to do. American theocracy. This is by John whitehead of
Speaker 1: the Rutherford Institute. Free Thought Project had the article as well,
Speaker 1: American Theocracy. Politics has become our national religion. He says,
Speaker 1: statism has turned into a cult, and as Americans continue
Speaker 1: to pray at the altar of the state, they lose
Speaker 1: their liberty in the process, and some of them will
Speaker 1: actually also pray to Ascended Masters and the Maga thing
Speaker 1: the Reawaken America tour. While those on the left have
Speaker 1: feared a religious coup by evangelical Christians on the right,
Speaker 1: the danger has come from an altogether direction. Our constitutional
Speaker 1: republic has given way to a theocracy that is structured
Speaker 1: around the worship of a political savior. For all intents
Speaker 1: and purposes, politics has become America's guy. Pay close attention
Speaker 1: to the political conventions for presidential candidates, and it becomes
Speaker 1: immediately evident that Americans are have allowed themselves to be
Speaker 1: brainwashed worshiping a political idol manufactured by the deep state.
Speaker 1: And I'm not just talking about the Trumpsters, I'm just
Speaker 1: talking about MAGA. It's pretty obvious when they do it.
Speaker 1: They speak in terms that are very similar to Christian
Speaker 1: religious terms. But of course the left does it as well.
Speaker 1: The left has their own set of values, and they
Speaker 1: literally do worship. They do idolize in the same way
Speaker 1: we talk about teen idols and movie stars and all
Speaker 1: the rest of the stuff as idols because they are
Speaker 1: that's what people value and put on a pedestal look
Speaker 1: to for help, for redemption, for whatever. And so both
Speaker 1: the left and the right are equally guilty of this.
Speaker 1: This isn't something that is limited to Christian nationalism or whatever.
Speaker 1: The left does it as well. There were the first
Speaker 1: ones actually to do it. Then unfortunately the right began
Speaker 1: doing it and a carefully choreographed scheme to strip American
Speaker 1: citizens of our power and our rights. We the people
Speaker 1: have become victims of the deep States con game. He says,
Speaker 1: You know when you get a con game besides laying
Speaker 1: the foundation for an illusion, an approach making you feel
Speaker 1: like you got a vested income. And the outcome of
Speaker 1: all of this, You know, there is a very familiar
Speaker 1: pattern to a con game, a confidence game. He says.
Speaker 1: In this particular con game, every candidate dangled before us
Speaker 1: as some form of a political savior, whether it's Trump
Speaker 1: or la Law, all then part of a long running,
Speaker 1: elaborate scam intended to persuade us that, despite all appearances
Speaker 1: to the contrary, we live in a constitutional republic. But
Speaker 1: no matter who wins this election, we will all still
Speaker 1: be prisoners of the deep state because government continues to expand,
Speaker 1: and as it expands, liberty shrinks. Yeah, despite what some
Speaker 1: may think, the Constitution is not a magical incantation against
Speaker 1: government wrongdoing. Indeed, it is only as effective as those
Speaker 1: who abide by it. That's one you have why I say.
Speaker 1: You know, we got people like Mark Levin, who wrote
Speaker 1: a book, made a lot of money saying here's some
Speaker 1: constitutional amendments I've got that are going to fix everything.
Speaker 1: I was like, no, it's not. I don't fix anything.
Speaker 1: First of all, who would be putting that into place?
Speaker 1: It would be the same people who won't obey the constitution.
Speaker 1: They've got right now. I mean, who's going to go
Speaker 1: to this constitutional convention. It's going to be the politicians
Speaker 1: and stuff of the both major parties. They won't abide
Speaker 1: by this constitution. What makes you think that they would
Speaker 1: abide by another constitution? If you put something in there
Speaker 1: to balance the budget, they'll ignore it. Now, the problem
Speaker 1: is not the flawed constitution. The problem is the flawed
Speaker 1: politicians and the fact that we don't hold them responsible
Speaker 1: to obey it. And so all a constitutional convention is
Speaker 1: going to do is it's going to open up a
Speaker 1: process by which these people who refuse to obey the
Speaker 1: constitution can alter it to their liking. Do you really
Speaker 1: want that? I don't. Unfortunately, unfortunately, the courts and the
Speaker 1: police have meshed their thinking to such an extent that
Speaker 1: anything goes when it is done the name of national
Speaker 1: security or fighting crime, or fighting terrorism or a pandemic,
Speaker 1: or fighting climate change and so forth. This is why
Speaker 1: that court decision, Fifth Circuit Court decision about geo fencing
Speaker 1: was good. That judge took on that argument head on,
Speaker 1: said yeah, I know that was a legitimate thing. These
Speaker 1: are people committed a violent robbery, and it's to make
Speaker 1: it harder for the police to do that. But we
Speaker 1: don't want the police to act in a criminal way
Speaker 1: that it'd be even worse. Evangelical Christians, seduced by the
Speaker 1: electoral promises of power and religious domination, have become yet
Speaker 1: another tool in the politician's toolbox. This is exactly what
Speaker 1: theologian Francis Schaeffer warned against. He said, we must not
Speaker 1: confuse the Kingdom of God with our country. To say
Speaker 1: it another way, we should not wrap Christianity in our
Speaker 1: national flag. Absolutely, And as a matter of fact, I
Speaker 1: want to give you a good example of this when
Speaker 1: we look at what is happening in our country. A
Speaker 1: lot of people are lining up one side of the
Speaker 1: other over the abortion issue. And I believe that that
Speaker 1: is a very important issue. You know that if you
Speaker 1: listen to me. But I also don't trust the politicians
Speaker 1: to do anything about it, and I also don't trust
Speaker 1: them to the right thing about any number of issues.
Speaker 1: Lala Harris is running for freedom. Even Reason magazine says,
Speaker 1: does that mean anything more than just abortion? No, it
Speaker 1: never has. Even they caught on to what I've been
Speaker 1: saying for the longest time that when she talks about
Speaker 1: freedom of choice, she's pro choice. The only thing that
Speaker 1: she has pro choice about is killing babies. And so
Speaker 1: that means that you've got people like John MacArthur. This
Speaker 1: is going back now to the last election four years ago,
Speaker 1: September of twenty twenty. What was happening in September twenty twenty, Well,
Speaker 1: we had had two weeks of lockdown to flatten the
Speaker 1: cave since the middle of March, so we had had
Speaker 1: at that point in time six weeks. The two weeks
Speaker 1: had turned into six weeks and there was no end
Speaker 1: in sight. And as a matter of fact, in California,
Speaker 1: where MacArthur's church was in, well, in July, Newsom did
Speaker 1: a second round of lockdowns, and what he did was
Speaker 1: he said, well, we're going to allow people to show
Speaker 1: up to church. We're going to have limits as to
Speaker 1: the number of people they can be in a public
Speaker 1: any public building or whatever, and you have to wear masks,
Speaker 1: and you can't sing and all the rest of the stuff.
Speaker 1: And so at that point in time, MacArthur's church, which
Speaker 1: had complied with it for the first four months, so
Speaker 1: we're not going to do that anymore. And so then
Speaker 1: two months later in September, as the election is coming
Speaker 1: up in just a couple of months, John MacArthur had
Speaker 1: a conversation with Donald Trump on the phone. MacArthur at
Speaker 1: the time again was an illegal battle, which by the way,
Speaker 1: they ultimately prevailed. They had massive fines put against them,
Speaker 1: and many other churches did as well. They weren't the
Speaker 1: only ones in California that had fines put against them.
Speaker 1: They escrowed those fines, but they had to put them
Speaker 1: up and put them away into a fund and just
Speaker 1: in case they lost while the court case worked his
Speaker 1: way through. But again this was he said at the time.
Speaker 1: He said, he said true believers. In twenty twenty, true
Speaker 1: believers will vote for Trump because we can't affirm abortion
Speaker 1: and transactivism. Well, certainly, I understand these issues are things
Speaker 1: that Christians cannot affirm. But when you look at transactivism,
Speaker 1: Trump was the one who was affirming transactivism, saying we
Speaker 1: need to have men in my beauty contests. He affirmed
Speaker 1: it in twenty twenty. He was selling rainbow clothing, he
Speaker 1: was doing DEI promotions. He got Rick Gurnell, who appeared
Speaker 1: to be qualified unlike these people that have been brought
Speaker 1: in with a Biden administration, and yet Rick Crnell didn't
Speaker 1: talk about his qualifications to be d and I. Instead
Speaker 1: he talked about the fact that he was LGBT. Why
Speaker 1: why is that more important than his ability to do
Speaker 1: the job. And again Milania was bragging at the same time,
Speaker 1: saying Trump was the first president to come into office
Speaker 1: supporting homosexual marriage, because even Obama didn't when he got elected.
Speaker 1: An interview, MacArthur discussed a phone conversation that he had
Speaker 1: with Trump over this litigation. He said, he called me
Speaker 1: after the Sunday morning service and he was very gracious.
Speaker 1: He said, I just want to thank you for taking
Speaker 1: a stand. Church is essential, said Trump, Oh, it is.
Speaker 1: I thought it was non essential. I thought it was
Speaker 1: like all of these main street businesses that you called
Speaker 1: non essential while you kept Walmart open. Look, the money
Speaker 1: was coming from Trump. He was paying these people. They
Speaker 1: laid that out going back to the original germ game,
Speaker 1: Dark Winter, and they passed the legislation back around you
Speaker 1: know nine eleven. As I've talked about so many times,
Speaker 1: it was all there to have the states do it,
Speaker 1: and to have the federal government provide the money and
Speaker 1: it was according to what they had planned and practiced
Speaker 1: for twenty years. Trump executed it to a t. The
Speaker 1: responsibility the buck stops with him, but the financing that
Speaker 1: buck began with him. But MacArthur said, he explained that
Speaker 1: the President had talked a little bit about why, certainly,
Speaker 1: from a biblical standpoint, Christians could not vote democratic. MacArthur said,
Speaker 1: There's no way a Christian can affirm the slaughter of babies,
Speaker 1: homosexual activity, homosexual marriage, or any kind of gross and moorality.
Speaker 1: And yet Trump guilty himself of gross immorality, Trump supporting
Speaker 1: homosexual marriage, coming in with that, bragging about all of
Speaker 1: these things as a matter of fact, bragging about his
Speaker 1: personal immorality, bragging about his support of what MacArthur says
Speaker 1: no Christian can support. No way could we stand behind
Speaker 1: a candidate who was affirming transgender behavior. But MacArthur did, which,
Speaker 1: of course, is really the reprobate mind of Romans won.
Speaker 1: He said. He said, he told Trump that abortion LGBT
Speaker 1: matters aren't even political of us, but rather these things
Speaker 1: are biblical. These things are laid down by the Word
Speaker 1: of God, I said to Trump, Any real true believer
Speaker 1: is going to be on your side in this election,
Speaker 1: because it's not just an individual, it's an entire set
Speaker 1: of policies that Christians cannot in any way affirm. Well,
Speaker 1: let me just say that I do agree with that.
Speaker 1: The problem is is that MacArthur's absolutely blind to or
Speaker 1: chooses not to look at the fact that Trump did
Speaker 1: affirm all of those things. Now, you can vote for
Speaker 1: whoever you want. I'm just saying I will not vote
Speaker 1: for either la Law or Donnie because they have both
Speaker 1: affirmed all of the things that he said a Christian
Speaker 1: cannot affirm. And I will not affirm this by voting
Speaker 1: for either one of them. If there's not another alternative
Speaker 1: on the ballot. And I'm not talking about RFK Junior either.
Speaker 1: If there's not another alternative there, I won't be voting.
Speaker 1: I will not vote for this stuff. I will not
Speaker 1: vote for Trump. He murdered people, not just babies, he
Speaker 1: murdered adults. He sent this poison around the world. He
Speaker 1: paid for governors Democrat and Republican to do all this stuff.
Speaker 1: So again, they eventually won their lawsuit with California. And
Speaker 1: you know when it's not just MacArthur who was saying,
Speaker 1: we absolutely have to and he said that in twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: we must support fill in the blank. But we've also
Speaker 1: go have That's one of the reasons why I wanted
Speaker 1: to cover this. We now also have Matt Walsh who
Speaker 1: is saying that Christians must vote for Trump. I think
Speaker 1: we need to push back over sorry about that guaranteed
Speaker 1: of free speech on misinformation or hate speech and especially
Speaker 1: around our democracy. Yeah, of course that's what he says.
Speaker 1: Another reason not to vote for these people. But here's
Speaker 1: what Matt Walsh has to say.
Speaker 2: It's very simple.
Speaker 3: Every American who considers himself conservative or Christian has a
Speaker 3: moral obligation to vote against Kamala Harris. This is a
Speaker 3: bad person, and she is part of a regime. More importantly,
Speaker 3: that has very bad, very evil designs for this country.
Speaker 3: She wants to kill babies, okay up to the moment
Speaker 3: of birth. That's what these people believe in fully born infants.
Speaker 3: She wants to destroy our national sovereignty. She doesn't believe to.
Speaker 1: Think Trump killed people. She wants to the entire.
Speaker 3: Lifeted into an ideology of self harm and confusion. These
Speaker 3: are the people who want to release violent criminals onto
Speaker 3: the streets. You know, to continue to destroy our communities,
Speaker 3: and in every other sense, they are actively working against
Speaker 3: everything we claim to stand for. So whatever you think
Speaker 3: of Trump, I mean, even if you have the most
Speaker 3: unflattering view of him that a reasonable person could possibly have.
Speaker 1: How about a mass murderer? How about that? Matt not
Speaker 1: part of that agenda. He's part of the mass murder agenda.
Speaker 1: And if you are voting for that, he's part of
Speaker 1: the globalist agenda. Like, I can't listen to any more
Speaker 1: of this stuff. These people make me so angry. I
Speaker 1: tell you what you know. Come on, I can't vote
Speaker 1: for Lawais He's right, and I can't vote for a
Speaker 1: mass murdering, traitor, backstabbing trader like Donald Trump. These people
Speaker 1: want you to believe that he's on your side. Nothing
Speaker 1: could be further from the truth. We're gonna take a
Speaker 1: quick break and we'll come back. Let me calm him
Speaker 1: down here, We'll be right back.
Speaker 4: M h.
Speaker 2: Making sense common again. You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 1: Well I'm right, and Doug a log. Thank you very
Speaker 1: much for the tip and thank you for the reminder,
Speaker 1: he says, Thank you, David. Tell everybody to hit the
Speaker 1: like button and that really does help us if you
Speaker 1: can hit that like button. It's difficult to get visibility
Speaker 1: for this program because we have we talk about things
Speaker 1: that don't like and so again, if you like the show,
Speaker 1: please hit the like button and please share it. Let's
Speaker 1: do talk about LA law. For example, I spoke the
Speaker 1: other day about a business owner who had two bars
Speaker 1: and was kicked out of them by Tim Walls in
Speaker 1: Minnesota and had to go to another state to open
Speaker 1: up a business so she could work. And now there's
Speaker 1: another story. This is from WND Wrecked My Life, says
Speaker 1: a grandmother who was sent to jail by him over
Speaker 1: his lockdown Tierney, I showed you yesterday the paintball shooting
Speaker 1: of people on their porch. These people are unhinged, absolutely unhache.
Speaker 1: But here's another thing. Right as Trump was writing the
Speaker 1: checks for governors like this, you know when when Walls
Speaker 1: did stuff like this, when Newsom or Nuisance did stuff
Speaker 1: like this, why didn't Trump say, if you do that,
Speaker 1: I'm going to stop the money. Because Trump knows. Trump said,
Speaker 1: if the government does such and such, if they put
Speaker 1: boys in the girls bathroom, I'm going to stop the money.
Speaker 1: And of course Obama had before that had said, if
Speaker 1: you don't put boys in the girls bathroom, I'm going
Speaker 1: to stop the money. That's how they get people to
Speaker 1: do things. That's how they get around the restrictions of
Speaker 1: the Tenth Amendment. They don't have the legal authority to
Speaker 1: do it. Instead, they use financial incentives in the same
Speaker 1: way that Jeff Sessions didn't have the authority to stop
Speaker 1: the legalization of marijuana for medical uses or even for
Speaker 1: recreational uses in various states because they had never bothered
Speaker 1: to pass a constitutional amendment like they did with alcohol,
Speaker 1: so they didn't have the authority to do it. Instead,
Speaker 1: what he did was he offered them a partnership if
Speaker 1: they would steal property from people civilized at forfeiture and
Speaker 1: other things like that. It's always about the money, so
Speaker 1: the financial strings attached to it. And so Trump continued
Speaker 1: to fund Tim Walls as he was wrecking people's lives.
Speaker 1: And then, what has the GOP done to stop this
Speaker 1: from ever happening again? Nothing. They don't even speak against it.
Speaker 1: The conservative press speaks against it, but the GOP in
Speaker 1: Congress doesn't do anything to stop any of this from
Speaker 1: happening again. Nothing. They stood idly by and we're talking
Speaker 1: about gop legislatures in Washington as well as in different
Speaker 1: states stood by while in many cases even a Republican
Speaker 1: governor was doing this stuff and did nothing. And they
Speaker 1: haven't done anything in the now that it's on pause,
Speaker 1: they've not done anything to keep them from starting it
Speaker 1: back up again. Minnesota grandmother who has jailed by Walls said,
Speaker 1: this man would like to take your rights away. Will
Speaker 1: he will take your rights away because that's what happened
Speaker 1: to me, and it could happen to anybody. What happened
Speaker 1: to me will happen to you, she said. Her name
Speaker 1: is Lisa Hanson. She formerly owned a wine and coffee bistro.
Speaker 1: She's now talking about Walls's lockdown agenda, the result in
Speaker 1: her being thrown in jail for sixty days. She said,
Speaker 1: he essentially shut down and destroyed my small business. And
Speaker 1: she said Americans don't want tyranny at this level. There
Speaker 1: are various state level orders that were often political so
Speaker 1: as fixing snooze. But they say various state level orders
Speaker 1: regarding the China originated virus, you see the cover up.
Speaker 1: Let's tell everybody it was real, and let's tell everybody
Speaker 1: that it was China, so we can go to war
Speaker 1: with China. He has another reason we should go to
Speaker 1: war with him. They unleashed this, this cooty thing on us.
Speaker 1: We got Chinese cooties all over us, and all of
Speaker 1: our politicians had no choice but to mask us up.
Speaker 1: Have us do all these simon says rules, stay six
Speaker 1: feet apart, walk in the line, do this, can't go
Speaker 1: to a restaurant.
Speaker 2: Kid doing this?
Speaker 1: Say that was the China cooties that they gave us.
Speaker 1: At the time, the so called pandemic was in full swing.
Speaker 1: In twenty twenty, hens And said the Interchange Wine and
Speaker 1: Coffee bistro that she ran had been opened for eight years,
Speaker 1: and of course, you know five years is usually the
Speaker 1: failure rate for a new business. If you can make
Speaker 1: it past five years, you usually know what you're doing. Minnesota.
Speaker 1: The Minnesota grandma was sentenced to ninety days in prison
Speaker 1: for violating Walls's tyranny. She said she initially complied with
Speaker 1: his orders that the business close, even though his demands
Speaker 1: always exempted big box stores, liquor stores, and even strip clubs. Well,
Speaker 1: because we know that a LA Law and Walls administration
Speaker 1: is going to be very much like the Biden administration.
Speaker 1: I mean, this tranny is a big fan of him.
Speaker 1: You have said that Governor Wallace has shown up. This
Speaker 1: is lieutenant governor. By the way, on the right.
Speaker 5: You are the first out transgender legislator in Minnesota.
Speaker 1: No, I'm sorry, that's not lieutenant governed by that expand
Speaker 1: on it a little bit.
Speaker 6: Yes, of course, you know where you elected eleven new
Speaker 6: LGBTQ members to the House two years ago and created
Speaker 6: the Queer Caucus. And I started pushing the importance of
Speaker 6: the trans refuge bill that I carried. He was always
Speaker 6: right there. He understood that this is a way for
Speaker 6: us to help community members, to help people who are different.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and the lieutenant governor looks very similar to that
Speaker 1: guy who's dressed up as a woman. You know, I
Speaker 1: imagine there's if there's any conservatives left in their arm,
Speaker 1: because one of them contacted us with a show. But
Speaker 1: anybody that's not radical left like this, if they're probably
Speaker 1: praying that Tim doesn't go to Watchman so they don't
Speaker 1: get the lieutenant governor that's waiting right there behind him. Anyway, Eventually,
Speaker 1: she said, you shut down a lot of momm and
Speaker 1: pop shops that's the whole point. That's what was non essential,
Speaker 1: these folks that were just trying to make a living
Speaker 1: and to provide a great product and a great service.
Speaker 1: In contrasts, he allowed big box stores to stay open,
Speaker 1: So Trump did. The people on Wall Street, that's all
Speaker 1: they care about. You, on the other hand, operating in
Speaker 1: a real competitive free market on main Street. You're not
Speaker 1: on Wall Street. You're not competing on Wall Street. You
Speaker 1: don't have unlimited amounts of money that are funded for
Speaker 1: the people on Wall Street. No, you have to actually
Speaker 1: try to provide I had a better product at a
Speaker 1: better price. Shut them down. They're not essential. Eventually, she
Speaker 1: reopened her business because she's going to go out of
Speaker 1: business anyway. She was convicted of a misdemeanor charge, got
Speaker 1: ninety days in jail and one thousand dollars fine. She said,
Speaker 1: this is the story that America needs to hear. The
Speaker 1: Tim Walls is not some cuddly, joyful coach like all
Speaker 1: the things of the mainstream media is calling him right now.
Speaker 1: She said she missed a Christmas with her family, she
Speaker 1: missed her wedding anniversary, and she missed the birth of
Speaker 1: a grand child. I can never have that time back
Speaker 1: that time was stolen from me. My business was destroyed.
Speaker 1: My business is gone. After everything that happened, Tim Walls
Speaker 1: and stayed Attorney General Keith Ellison destroyed my business and
Speaker 1: wrecked my life. I've heard some people say that Walls
Speaker 1: is a really nice guy. Yeah, well he's not take
Speaker 1: my word for it. Through this whole process, she said,
Speaker 1: I've gotten to know other people and similar things happened
Speaker 1: to them when they were trying to run their business
Speaker 1: and trying to survive. And she said mostly women, by
Speaker 1: the way. So Tim Walls and law La Harris and
Speaker 1: Keith Ellison really liked to go after women. They're bullies
Speaker 1: and they like to go after women and torment and
Speaker 1: destroy women's lives. This is what they've done in the
Speaker 1: state of Minnesota. So let America know you don't want
Speaker 1: Tim Walls as vice president. And of course they're not
Speaker 1: going to talk about DeWine and Ohio the Republican governor.
Speaker 1: They're not going to talk about his collaborators like y
Speaker 1: Vake Ramaswami, and certainly I talk about Trump and the
Speaker 1: GOP in Congress. He really did step outside of statutory law,
Speaker 1: but even more important, constitutional law. Because we have that
Speaker 1: right to be able to run our business and to
Speaker 1: conduct our lives as we see fit and staying within
Speaker 1: the rule of law. And of course Walls didn't stay
Speaker 1: in the rule of law. None of these governors did.
Speaker 1: They used executive orders, they used martial law, which is
Speaker 1: not law at all. Kept saying, where's the law that
Speaker 1: allows you to do this? Well, they didn't want one.
Speaker 1: So when we look at Lala Harris, it's all about
Speaker 1: reparations and all the rest of this stuff. And of
Speaker 1: course she's looking at twenty four trillion dollars in reparations.
Speaker 1: Does she get the reparations or does she pay them
Speaker 1: because her father bragged about owning slaves in Jamaica and
Speaker 1: her mother's Indian. Well, she's hiding from interviews. It's now
Speaker 1: twenty five days since she was anointed without any votes
Speaker 1: by the Democrat Party and she doesn't want to talk
Speaker 1: to the press. As a matter of fact, the last
Speaker 1: time that she was questioning a news conference alone was
Speaker 1: eight months ago, December second. The Hairs campaign denied a
Speaker 1: request from Time magazine that was putting her on the cover.
Speaker 1: Even though they're putting her on the cover, she wouldn't
Speaker 1: do an interview with them? Why should she, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: they're going to do a puff piece anyway, They've already
Speaker 1: decided that they're going to make it a hagiography. Why
Speaker 1: does she need to talk to them? Harris pledged last
Speaker 1: week to schedule only one interview before the end of
Speaker 1: this month, although it's unclear whether the interview will take
Speaker 1: place the last three weeks of August or if it
Speaker 1: will take place before August ends. I mean, which month
Speaker 1: is she talking about? The mainstream media needs to stop
Speaker 1: being complicit with her lies and demand answers, said, ay,
Speaker 1: Trump campaign, But of course they're not going to get
Speaker 1: it when they asked the La Law campaign manager. The
Speaker 1: La LA campaign manager just laughed when asked why she
Speaker 1: hasn't had any press conferences because again it's the laughing
Speaker 1: liars of WA Law. That's some nicelliteration there. That's what
Speaker 1: they should probably call the campaign managers for LA Law.
Speaker 1: They just laugh about it. So they even asked, my Acosta,
Speaker 1: you know, when are you going to have Why hasn't
Speaker 1: she had a press conference? Michael Tyler, her communications director,
Speaker 1: left because that's what his boss does. Laughs. Babylin Bee
Speaker 1: says Biden is really bummed to realize that all he
Speaker 1: had to do to stay in the race was to
Speaker 1: not show up to the debate and it never speak
Speaker 1: to reporters ever. Again, hmm, that's exactly what she did.
Speaker 1: We've got Chelsea Gabbert calling her an empty suit. Actually
Speaker 1: an empty pants suit would be more accurate, but she
Speaker 1: is an empty suit for sure. Babylon Bee, quoting Biden,
Speaker 1: supposedly did that Broad just get my place, you know,
Speaker 1: the thing by not talking to the press. Oh come on,
Speaker 1: Jack only had one job, and I blew it well anyway.
Speaker 1: But she finally has a policy proposal, and it is
Speaker 1: price controls against price gouging by people selling food. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, I had a listener who sent me a
Speaker 1: piece out of Washington State and they're putting in universal
Speaker 1: basic income. And what does the piece focus on it
Speaker 1: focus on is focuses on somebody buying food. I have
Speaker 1: to have this help in order to buy food. Universal
Speaker 1: basic income is just welfare, but it's welfare for everybody.
Speaker 1: It's welfare connected to the technocrat plan to take everybody's
Speaker 1: job and to put us on welfare to make sure
Speaker 1: that we own nothing, to make us completely dependent on government,
Speaker 1: because that's what all welfare programs have always done. They
Speaker 1: claim that they're there to help people, but they've always
Speaker 1: made people dependent. They turn us into trained pets. And
Speaker 1: so La La says, well, we've got to uh, we've
Speaker 1: got I'm going to present a plan to in price
Speaker 1: gouging by food suppliers. But you know, you got Biden
Speaker 1: and the EU and all the rest of them talking
Speaker 1: about how they want to make it impossible for us
Speaker 1: to have meat and dairy, and of course I guess
Speaker 1: that also includes chicken and eggs, since they've spent the
Speaker 1: last couple of years culling as many chickens as they can.
Speaker 1: Now mass culling of the cows is why they're trying
Speaker 1: to line up. Why are they PCR testing milk for
Speaker 1: bird flu and meat for bird flu. I mean they're
Speaker 1: not even testing the eggs for bird flu. This is
Speaker 1: an announced agenda that they want to do. There's a
Speaker 1: big difference between fare pricing in competitive markets and access.
Speaker 1: The prices unrelated to the cost of doing business. Well,
Speaker 1: you're increasing energy prices. You're doing everything you can to
Speaker 1: make it difficult the USDA, the FDA, or making everything
Speaker 1: difficult for people to compete and to raise food. And
Speaker 1: when you talk about a competitive market, are you talking
Speaker 1: about something like what Tyson has done with this monopoly
Speaker 1: of chicken, heavily connected to the Democrat Party, heavily connected
Speaker 1: to the Clintons. Directly addressing the soaring meat prices, Harris
Speaker 1: will focus on corporate consolidation in that market as one
Speaker 1: reason meat prices are so high. Well, they put a
Speaker 1: spike into it with their policies, with their green policies
Speaker 1: in the nineteen seventies is this article from Mesa's institute
Speaker 1: mess dot org talks about Nixon's price controls and they said, well,
Speaker 1: He's only going to do it for ninety days. But
Speaker 1: of course it lasted for a year and a half.
Speaker 1: And although it was a complete failure in terms of
Speaker 1: getting inflation under control, he was perceived by the public
Speaker 1: as having quote done something. They say, hear that all
Speaker 1: the time Hillary Clinton was trying to take over healthcare,
Speaker 1: and you go to these meetings, and where I lived
Speaker 1: it was a completely radical Democrat district focused around University
Speaker 1: North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and all these people would say, well,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't know what we just got it's
Speaker 1: just too expensive. Healthcare is just too expensive, and we
Speaker 1: got to do something. I don't know what we need
Speaker 1: to do, but we need to do something. I said, well,
Speaker 1: maybe you need to look to see if that bucket
Speaker 1: has water in it or if it's got gasoline in it.
Speaker 1: And by the way, if it's got water and it's
Speaker 1: going to be that's not the right thing you want
Speaker 1: to use in some fires. Anyway. By early nineteen seventy three,
Speaker 1: mini producers that endured price controls for eighteen months. The
Speaker 1: US Senate reported that price controls had caused a breakdown
Speaker 1: and energy production and distribution, because that was the thing
Speaker 1: that they were trying to focus on. They said, well,
Speaker 1: it's energy prices. Fuel shortages were far more extensive than anticipated.
Speaker 1: So she puts price control on food, it's going to
Speaker 1: only exacerbate the condition. So we've had this rodeo before.
Speaker 1: But of course, you spent fifty years. People for the
Speaker 1: most part don't remember the failures of Richard Nixon. They
Speaker 1: just saw him again when he was running for reelection
Speaker 1: as a president who was trying to do something, trying
Speaker 1: to do just like Trump. You know, he was trying
Speaker 1: to do something. Oh he didn't know what he was doing,
Speaker 1: but you know, give him an a for effort type
Speaker 1: of thing. They knew to this day. When critics of
Speaker 1: the Bad Old Days the nineteen seventies talk about stagflation
Speaker 1: and the economic malaise of the era, critics usually only
Speaker 1: mentioned Jimmy Carter, who was saddled with the effects of
Speaker 1: the Nixon experiment. Nixon who crippled the economy in the
Speaker 1: nineteen seventies with his monetary inflation, with his price controls,
Speaker 1: and of course you know playing the games with gold
Speaker 1: that he did as well, because that was all tied together.
Speaker 1: And so the author at Misus said, the price control
Speaker 1: plan is nothing more than a cynical ploy to get
Speaker 1: Harris elected. And I say cynically said at this point,
Speaker 1: because it's beyond naive to think that they are only
Speaker 1: pushing for price controls because they have good intentions and
Speaker 1: are economically illiterate. They know, they just don't care. Like Nixon,
Speaker 1: price controls are a political policy. Impoverishing economic effects are
Speaker 1: just collateral damage. Now, all of that is not all
Speaker 1: that true. With the pandemic stuff in the lockdowns and
Speaker 1: everything else, it was not medical. I can't excuse the
Speaker 1: Republicans for their participation in this, saying that they were
Speaker 1: just illiterate and stupid. Now the people continue to vote
Speaker 1: for them, are stupid and illiterate. They knew what they
Speaker 1: were doing, and they considered mainstream America, main street small
Speaker 1: businesses to be nothing but collateral damage and they were
Speaker 1: not essential. So again people are calling her communist, and
Speaker 1: they're right, communism. Just call her commie la la. They
Speaker 1: want to call her Comma law, Well let's call her
Speaker 1: commu la la, because that's really what this is all about.
Speaker 1: Proposing the first ever federal ban unquote corporate price gouging
Speaker 1: in the food and grocery industries unquote. Well, maybe you
Speaker 1: know the solution would be to help small businesses by
Speaker 1: taking off the regulations on them that are trying to
Speaker 1: put them out of business. Let's have some competition in here.
Speaker 1: Let's stop the USDA from calling livestock. So the Heritage
Speaker 1: Foundation said, well, here's your price gouging narrative. Average costs
Speaker 1: paid by businesses have risen just as much as the
Speaker 1: costs charged to consumers. If businesses are being greedy, they're
Speaker 1: doing it all wrong. Now, this is all a bunch
Speaker 1: of just virtue signaling there is absolutely no way that
Speaker 1: they're going to be able to tie this down. But again,
Speaker 1: I want to take a quick break before we get
Speaker 1: our guests on. We have Jack Lawson who's going to
Speaker 1: be joining us, and before have him come on, I
Speaker 1: want to talk about what is going on with money
Speaker 1: and taxes and the policy statements that are being made
Speaker 1: even by conservatives and by libertarians. We'll be right back.
Speaker 1: They're doing what in the place they named after me.
Speaker 1: Good thing.
Speaker 3: I have the David Night Show to keep me informed
Speaker 3: on the plots.
Speaker 2: Of these traders, making sense common Again, this is the
Speaker 2: David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: On Rock Fan. Thank you, Dustin Helm and Mark c.
Speaker 1: Thank you both of you for the tip. I appreciate that.
Speaker 1: Before we get into the money, just kind of as
Speaker 1: a side issue since we're talking about bitcoin. One person
Speaker 1: did a Foyer request. I thought this is kind of interesting.
Speaker 1: Did a Foyer request of the FBI trying to get
Speaker 1: information about the creator of bitcoin and Satoshi Nakamoto. And
Speaker 1: the response that he got from them about Satoshi they said, well,
Speaker 1: Satoshi is a third party individual. He said, that's interesting
Speaker 1: that they would say that. He said, I submitted this
Speaker 1: as a broad general subject request with full context. So
Speaker 1: it is the Bureau and not me that is asserting
Speaker 1: that this is an individual. And he also says that
Speaker 1: when they use the phrase third party individual, they are
Speaker 1: not confirming or denying any records that they might have.
Speaker 1: But he said, typically this is their answer if anybody
Speaker 1: makes a four request regarding a non US person. So anyway,
Speaker 1: he thinks that because of that that there is actually
Speaker 1: somebody by the name or was somebody by the name
Speaker 1: of Satoshi Nakamoro whatever. Don Junior, by the way, is
Speaker 1: also saying that he's going to launch a crypto platform
Speaker 1: so he can take on the banks. Take on the banks. Well,
Speaker 1: that's an interesting perspective on this. Why is your dad
Speaker 1: running for president? Does he not want to take on
Speaker 1: the banks? What about Steve Manuchin and the Goldman Sachs
Speaker 1: bankers that he filled his cabinet with. What about the
Speaker 1: conspiring between Steve man Uchin and Jared and to set
Speaker 1: up CBDC. What about if you want to take on
Speaker 1: the banks, why didn't he just audit the FED. No,
Speaker 1: he's not going to do that, just like he won't
Speaker 1: release the JFK files. It's all kind of smoke and mirrors,
Speaker 1: and the real purpose of the Trump family is to
Speaker 1: get rich. But carving out a tax cut just for
Speaker 1: tips doesn't make sense. Even when La La Harris does,
Speaker 1: it doesn't make any more sense, says Reason magazine. And
Speaker 1: as I said before, it is truly disgusting and annoying
Speaker 1: to see conservatives and libertarians and the Office of Management
Speaker 1: and Budget, as soon as somebody talks about having a
Speaker 1: tax cut, even for people who are working as waitresses.
Speaker 1: We can't have that. Let's look at the budgetary concerns
Speaker 1: that are going to come out of it. That they
Speaker 1: don't have any budgetary concerns when it comes to wars,
Speaker 1: or when it comes to their green agenda, none of that.
Speaker 1: It's just blank checks everywhere. But hey, if you do
Speaker 1: a little bit of a tax reduction, all these people
Speaker 1: turn into Bernie Sanders. You can't cut the taxes. They're
Speaker 1: looting the treasury. Right So Reason says this is poorly
Speaker 1: thought out idea, no matter whose campaign is pushing it.
Speaker 1: As I wrote shortly after Trump flow to this in June,
Speaker 1: exempting tips from income taxes would increase the deficit. As
Speaker 1: I said, I can give you thirty five trillion reasons
Speaker 1: why the deficit doesn't matter? Why are they talking about
Speaker 1: it now? I mean, you know the purpose of government
Speaker 1: isn't to make make their life easy. You know, these
Speaker 1: people need to do the hard thing. They need to
Speaker 1: cut some spending, get it in line, instead of continually
Speaker 1: sending us more bills or kicking the can down the road.
Speaker 1: So he says, well, this doesn't do much to help
Speaker 1: the majority of Americans or to grow the economy. You see,
Speaker 1: libertarians are now even sounding like democrat demagogues. Well, what
Speaker 1: is the purpose of government? Is it to have freedom
Speaker 1: or is it to manage the economy? Grow the economy?
Speaker 1: That's what reason is telling you. And they quotes a
Speaker 1: senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation. He says, well,
Speaker 1: you know, we got let's talk about the restaurant. We
Speaker 1: got the cashier who's working here, and we got the
Speaker 1: waitress who's working here. And let's say they both make
Speaker 1: exactly the same amount of money. They make thirty four
Speaker 1: thousand dollars a year, but the waitress gets half of
Speaker 1: it in tips. Well, if you get rid of the
Speaker 1: tax on tips, that means that the cashier who is
Speaker 1: making thirty four thousand dollars a year. Non tip based
Speaker 1: will pay two thousand dollars in taxes and the waitress
Speaker 1: will only pay six hundred dollars in taxes. That's not fair,
Speaker 1: they say, you say, that's why I say, they sound
Speaker 1: like democrats. Well here's what's fair. Let's get rid of
Speaker 1: the taxes on both of them. Let's get rid of
Speaker 1: the income tax on all of us. Why doesn't Reason
Speaker 1: magazine talk about abolishing the income tax? I can give
Speaker 1: you thirty five trillion reasons why we should abolish the
Speaker 1: income tax. Because they don't care what the deficit is,
Speaker 1: So why are they taxing us? The income taxes never
Speaker 1: come close to paying for the all of the taxes,
Speaker 1: and the income taxes are only a small part of
Speaker 1: that pie has never come close to paying what they spend,
Speaker 1: and so why continue on with this? Well I know why,
Speaker 1: and you do too. Because they want to make sure
Speaker 1: that we don't have any discretionary income so they can
Speaker 1: use it as a trap for people. The spending is
Speaker 1: a problem. Why is the libertarian saying this? They've now
Speaker 1: taken the mental of fairness to argue for continuation of
Speaker 1: the income tax. He says, as a libertarian, it pains
Speaker 1: me to say this. It pains me to hear it.
Speaker 1: I want people to have less of their income consumed
Speaker 1: by the federal taxes. Exempting taxes would accomplish that, But
Speaker 1: the IRS tax data shows that about six point one
Speaker 1: million Americans, we get to keep about thirty eight billion
Speaker 1: dollars in income that would otherwise have been taxed away.
Speaker 1: And we can't afford in Washington to lose that revenue
Speaker 1: from these waiters and waitresses and laborers everywhere. Really, yeah,
Speaker 1: to matter, we don't have a Jefferson who said, as
Speaker 1: he began his second term, we eliminated useless offices in
Speaker 1: my first term, and as a result, we were able
Speaker 1: to lower taxes so that we don't have any internal
Speaker 1: taxes in our country. They said, what labor, what farmer?
Speaker 1: What mechanic knows the taxman? None? None? Why can't we
Speaker 1: even aspire to that as as a political goal. No,
Speaker 1: we're not going to do that as a matter of fact.
Speaker 1: They go on in another article at Reason attacking the
Speaker 1: idea that they would even adjust, you know, even adjust
Speaker 1: the taxes on Social Security to not have taxes charged
Speaker 1: on Social Security. And as I said before, when this
Speaker 1: was put out, by Trump, I said, do you realize
Speaker 1: that this hasn't changed in forty years. They haven't indexed
Speaker 1: it to inflation. In nineteen eighty four, if you made
Speaker 1: more than is just under twenty five thousand dollars, and
Speaker 1: if you made more than that, and that was the
Speaker 1: median family income in nineteen eighty four, about twenty five
Speaker 1: thousand dollars, if you made more than the median family income,
Speaker 1: then they would start taxing away your Social Security payments. Well,
Speaker 1: they haven't changed that number in forty years, except we've
Speaker 1: had inflation, and so now the median family income is
Speaker 1: three times that, which means that if you make more
Speaker 1: than one third of the median family income, they start
Speaker 1: taking away your Social Security tax First of all, at
Speaker 1: the very least, couldn't reason magazine the libertarians. Couldn't they
Speaker 1: at least argue that we shouldn't be taxed on inflation
Speaker 1: like that, because that's what that amounts to. Can't you
Speaker 1: at least index that if you think that's a reasonable
Speaker 1: thing to do. Can't you at least index that? No better? Yet,
Speaker 1: why should we be taxed twice? It truly is amazing
Speaker 1: to see this, these small policy changes that are there
Speaker 1: I don't think will ever be instituted, because you will
Speaker 1: have the even if Trump were to get elected or
Speaker 1: la Law were to get elected, you're going to have
Speaker 1: these status organizations like Reason, Cato, the Libertarians, and the
Speaker 1: Heritage Foundation, the biggest conservative think thing. They're going to
Speaker 1: be there pushing against this, just like they were pushing
Speaker 1: back against stopping the censorship on social media by these
Speaker 1: big tech companies. It's just absolutely people need to wake
Speaker 1: up and look at these organizations that are supposedly fighting
Speaker 1: for the market and for freedom and for the Second
Speaker 1: Amendment and all the rest of the stuff. You need
Speaker 1: to look at what they actually do because in many
Speaker 1: cases they're actually opposing what we want to do. Before
Speaker 1: we go to break, I just want to remind you
Speaker 1: that if you want to get outside of this crazy system,
Speaker 1: and you need to get outside of the system that's
Speaker 1: coming after you for CBDC and IDs and all the
Speaker 1: rest of the stuff that wants to know and track
Speaker 1: every thing about you, think about trying to get some
Speaker 1: money outside of their system. And if you go to
Speaker 1: tony Ardban's wise Wolf Gold, you can get there with
Speaker 1: David Knight dot Gold. You can buy gold or silver,
Speaker 1: small or large amounts, and if you want to start
Speaker 1: accumulating it on a regular basis, he set up wolf
Speaker 1: pack and you can get group buying discounts. As a
Speaker 1: part of that group, you get that discount and you
Speaker 1: can decide on a monthly basis how much you want
Speaker 1: to set aside to start getting out of this system
Speaker 1: and to start preserving your wealth. As I said yesterday,
Speaker 1: take a look not at the price of gold, but
Speaker 1: take a look at the price of things in gold.
Speaker 1: As you talked about yesterday, many commodities or activities are
Speaker 1: traveling or food or any of these types of look
Speaker 1: at the price in gold and you'll see that it
Speaker 1: is a far better measure of the wealth protection than
Speaker 1: looking at these constantly varying currencies in different countries, including
Speaker 1: the United States. Okay, we're going to take a quick
Speaker 1: break and we'll be right back with Jack Lawson of
Speaker 1: Civil Defensemanual dot.
Speaker 2: Com defending the American Dream. You're listening to the David
Speaker 2: Night Show.
Speaker 1: Well, welcome back and joining us now is Jack Lawson
Speaker 1: of Civil Defensemanual dot com. And this is what the
Speaker 1: Civil Defense manuals look like. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: Red and green and if you want to know how
Speaker 1: to survive and how to thrive and how to protect
Speaker 1: your family. This is like a Christmas present. These red
Speaker 1: and green volumes are Volume one and Volume two. He
Speaker 1: only sells it and physical form because one of the
Speaker 1: key things that's a threat to us is the infrastructure
Speaker 1: of the internet and power and things like that. One
Speaker 1: of the key times that you're going to need to
Speaker 1: have this stuff is when you lose the internet and
Speaker 1: you lose power, and so he talks about that and
Speaker 1: many other things. Joining us now is Jacklaws and good
Speaker 1: to have you on, Jack. Thanks for coming on. I
Speaker 1: was always good to be in your show. David.
Speaker 5: Everybody in the United States that's got an adult mind
Speaker 5: should be listening to you every morning.
Speaker 1: Oh, I know what you say, it's so common sense.
Speaker 1: I was laughing thinking about.
Speaker 5: Your You know, you're talking about the government and expenditure.
Speaker 5: That reminded me of a girlfriend girlfriend I had where
Speaker 5: I got married at Is almost made the statement it's
Speaker 5: a joke, but she alsomost made the statement to me,
Speaker 5: how can I be overdrawn? I've still got checks in
Speaker 5: my checkbook and don't you balance your check book? How
Speaker 5: do you balance?
Speaker 1: So she is she working for the Congress or the
Speaker 1: Federal Reserve.
Speaker 5: Now probably the Federal Reserve. It's one of her strategists.
Speaker 1: Anyway, lots of checks. So one of the things that
Speaker 1: we're raisier by the day, that's right. One of the
Speaker 1: things that we're looking at now, of course, the who
Speaker 1: We all know that there's another pandemic that they're going
Speaker 1: to try to pull on us, and the question is,
Speaker 1: you know, what are we going to do about it.
Speaker 1: Is it going to be bird flu or maybe it's
Speaker 1: going to be impos You know, that's their thing this
Speaker 1: last week, and so you know they're talking about a
Speaker 1: international emergency and an emergency in Africa and all the
Speaker 1: rest of the stuff. How do we survive infectious disease
Speaker 1: and things like that? When you in your civil Defense manual,
Speaker 1: what do you what do you tell people?
Speaker 5: Yeah, David, first, I'd like to just give a brief
Speaker 5: overview of my background. I am not really highly formally educated.
Speaker 5: I got a couple probably three years of university in
Speaker 5: a family that's full of PhDs and masters, and most
Speaker 5: of them can't tie their shoes.
Speaker 1: I can tie my shoes. The issue is I.
Speaker 5: Was on one of the largest police boards in the
Speaker 5: nation judging police officers shooting using deadly force.
Speaker 1: I was in the.
Speaker 5: American Air Force at one period of time for four years.
Speaker 5: I had a job there as an electrictronics technician.
Speaker 1: One of my.
Speaker 5: Parts of that was arming and disarming the nuclear weapon.
Speaker 5: Every one of the missiles I worked on were nuclear tipped.
Speaker 5: It was in early fence system. I went from that,
Speaker 5: got out, walked around the world with a backpack whatever.
Speaker 5: I ended up in Africa and I was in a
Speaker 5: Foreign Legion anti terrorist unit for two and a half years.
Speaker 5: I was involved in a lot of the activities with this.
Speaker 5: I had a relationship through that with the ABC agencies,
Speaker 5: so to speak, not just America.
Speaker 1: And other ones.
Speaker 5: So anyway, taking all Latin six ninety five, I think
Speaker 5: you told me it was no longer four ninety five
Speaker 5: at Starbucks to get a coffee at six ninety five,
Speaker 5: somebody told me that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, may mean somebody designed me I don't go to Starbucks.
Speaker 1: I don't either.
Speaker 5: I don't know what it is, but it's not coffee, no,
Speaker 5: as somebody told me that, And I said, well, six
Speaker 5: ninety five, and my background will gets you a cup
Speaker 5: of coffee. In reality, though, It's given me a lot
Speaker 5: of experiences that a lot of people don't have in
Speaker 5: this book. This book is really in a way, it's mistitled.
Speaker 5: It's called a civil defense manual. It's more than just
Speaker 5: a civil defense manual. It is a survival book. I've
Speaker 5: got everything under the sun in there that I've touched
Speaker 5: on that people can look at.
Speaker 1: They will learn things.
Speaker 5: I have a section on pandemic, and the reason I
Speaker 5: have a section on pandemic is because I think that
Speaker 5: is a major bio weapon being used by political by
Speaker 5: political directors, people that are running this whole show. And
Speaker 5: it's an incredible weapon, along with food and water. But
Speaker 5: people don't think of these things as weapons. But I
Speaker 5: believe we have another pandemic coming and I'll make it
Speaker 5: real short. In this book, you'll see a recipe very simple.
Speaker 5: You buy this on the internet for monkey pox. Now,
Speaker 5: the poxes collpox, monkey pox, smallpox, smallpox is extremely restricted.
Speaker 5: They do as far as I know, there's no testing
Speaker 5: done outside of the federal government. Poxes are very old,
Speaker 5: a major and very old minor.
Speaker 1: There's two types.
Speaker 5: But the bottom line is I've got something in there
Speaker 5: that will cure this. And when I say cure it.
Speaker 5: You have to get it first. You got to survive
Speaker 5: the pustules. But the Mickmac and Cree Indians use this.
Speaker 5: During the French and Indian Wars, British artillery surgeons, French
Speaker 5: surgeons wrote glowing reports about this, how puscules had formed
Speaker 5: on the soldiers and the old Micmac Indian women would
Speaker 5: go and put the Saracena papyria. It's a venus fly
Speaker 5: trap found up in Quebec in the swamp lands, and
Speaker 5: it would take the oil from this, put it on
Speaker 5: the pustule and it would not only kill what's in
Speaker 5: the pustule, it would give your body immunity. You had
Speaker 5: to survive to this point though, and they wrote glowing
Speaker 5: reports on it. Because smallpox is very, very deadly. It
Speaker 5: still is, but there's different types of boxes. I just
Speaker 5: get into a lot of this, and the reason I
Speaker 5: do I also had first hand experience in Africa with
Speaker 5: typhus dysentery. Those are what they call the twin sisters
Speaker 5: of poor poor sanitation typhus dysentery. And there's a third
Speaker 5: one that should be a close cousin, and that's cholera.
Speaker 5: I've seen the epidemics. I've seen the cordoned areas. I
Speaker 5: imagine I was around somebody. I was lucky it did
Speaker 5: and catch it. Life is from Africa, she's British and
Speaker 5: when this COVID came out, she laughed at it. I
Speaker 5: started to believe there's something to it. After a while,
Speaker 5: psychological uh, psychological operations, which was part of the thing,
Speaker 5: and they found in retrospect there was less than a
Speaker 5: one percent chance of death from it. Most of the
Speaker 5: death didn't come from COVID. It came from comorbidity issues.
Speaker 5: They had high blood pressure, he had kidney problems.
Speaker 1: This would kill you so and their ventilators and the
Speaker 1: rim desivir.
Speaker 5: Oh my my god, that is you know, it is astounding.
Speaker 5: I read about a doctor in a hospital in Chicago.
Speaker 5: I had a patient there. It just happened to be
Speaker 5: a black guy that was really sick dying. He was
Speaker 5: probably within two hours of dying. The doctor went to
Speaker 5: the pharmacy and got a what at asthmatics use. It
Speaker 5: was called sport de court. It was a spray and
Speaker 5: hailer and he forced us down this guy's throat and
Speaker 5: six days later that man that would have been dead
Speaker 5: walked out of that hospital.
Speaker 1: They fired the doctor. Yeah, exactly, that's right.
Speaker 5: Okay, they want a doctor for going outside hospital protocol,
Speaker 5: put a ventilator on him and kill him. No, he
Speaker 5: used something that he thought would work and it did.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, there was I've reported. A pullmonologist came out
Speaker 1: and said, you know, he had decades of experience in pulmonology,
Speaker 1: and he said, we've never done I've been later intubation
Speaker 1: with people as a means of treatment, and all the
Speaker 1: time I've been working as a pullmonologist. He goes, what
Speaker 1: is this about. It was really set up, I think,
Speaker 1: to kill people, and it was set up to make
Speaker 1: sure that if anybody got outside of the agenda's not
Speaker 1: just getting outside of the hospital's protocol, but it's getting
Speaker 1: outside of the agenda of getting everybody locked down until
Speaker 1: the vaccine comes. That's the key thing. I think. You know,
Speaker 1: how do we we protect ourselves from the government when
Speaker 1: they come around with the needles and the swabs and
Speaker 1: all the rest of the stuff that could be the
Speaker 1: biological weapon.
Speaker 5: Well, people can't see through this COVID thing. They're looking
Speaker 5: at the wrong information. I mean, we live in a
Speaker 5: world where we have massive amounts of input audio visual
Speaker 5: if they are not understanding that, just like happened to
Speaker 5: a friend of ours, thirty three years old, didn't drink,
Speaker 5: didn't smoke, didn't do any drugs, went to sleep on
Speaker 5: a Tuesday night, room temperature. The next morning he died.
Speaker 5: Left three kids, left a beautiful wife. Why well, the
Speaker 5: mother in law was hounding everybody in the family.
Speaker 1: Get the COVID shot. Get the COVID shot.
Speaker 5: Of course, she's a raving liberal and her husband's one
Speaker 5: of the finest people ever met. But she virtually harangued
Speaker 5: everybody and to get this shot. Don't come to our
Speaker 5: house unless you got the COVID shot. Well, they got
Speaker 5: the COVID shot, and now it's unfortunate. I had big
Speaker 5: tears in my eyes for this guy.
Speaker 1: He was a nice, just to find human being.
Speaker 5: But well, and you know we can't see this. Yeah,
Speaker 5: they better resist this next one.
Speaker 1: That's all I say. That's right, and going back and
Speaker 1: looking at it as they looked at the different lots
Speaker 1: because it was one of the things that they wanted
Speaker 1: to keep track of. They wanted your personal information, whether
Speaker 1: you'd taken it or refused. And then the lot number, well,
Speaker 1: the lots various lots varied by factor of over thirty,
Speaker 1: so you could get your dosage could very by factor
Speaker 1: of thirty. That's one of the reasons why you're seeing,
Speaker 1: you know, some people dying right away, other people dying
Speaker 1: a couple of months down the road or having severe
Speaker 1: adverse effects, and other people not being affected by it
Speaker 1: at all. The whole thing was a mass experiment on people.
Speaker 1: That's why they want to keep track of the lot
Speaker 1: numbers so they could look to see they they didn't
Speaker 1: do any tests of any of the stuff. One of
Speaker 1: the things the reasons that you test is because you
Speaker 1: have to determine how much is too much of a dosage,
Speaker 1: how much is too little if it's a medication. But
Speaker 1: that's what they were doing with this stuff. It was
Speaker 1: just a most unbelievable thing I've ever seen in my life.
Speaker 1: And so I guess the real key thing is that
Speaker 1: to me, if they declare a pandemic, I want to
Speaker 1: know how I can live in an off grid isolated
Speaker 1: way from them so that I'm not going to come
Speaker 1: in contact with the public health officials who are going
Speaker 1: to do everything they can to try to hit me
Speaker 1: with a bio weapon.
Speaker 5: Well, I think it's going to go beyond that. I
Speaker 5: think they're going to start using their massive amount of
Speaker 5: computer information and probably breeze bank accounts. Oh yeah, there'll
Speaker 5: be a number of things that are done. But if
Speaker 5: people don't, if people do not resist this, they're looking
Speaker 5: for trouble. This this whole thing is designed. In my opinion,
Speaker 5: as a friend of mine, it was in one of
Speaker 5: my he was in my command of unit in Africa.
Speaker 1: A mutual friend of ours died. He was a homicide
Speaker 1: detective in Florida. And I talked to my friend Ross
Speaker 1: and I said, what what happened? Drops dead.
Speaker 5: His face into his food on a Saturday night in
Speaker 5: front of his wife. I feel so sorry for her.
Speaker 5: He was a he was a great guy, but he
Speaker 5: was our medi and my friend Ross didn't get the shot.
Speaker 5: He said, I thought this was something goofy from the
Speaker 5: beginning because he's from Africa, He's been through all this
Speaker 5: stuff and he saw this Oli Bloni's horns about get
Speaker 5: the shot, get the shot, and literally forcing people by
Speaker 5: peer pressure.
Speaker 1: Into getting this.
Speaker 5: And he had an argument with our friend had died,
Speaker 5: and our friend said, I know my medicine his father
Speaker 5: used to be a doctor.
Speaker 1: But I know he was a good medic. He was
Speaker 1: a good man. But he believed this.
Speaker 5: Stuff because they put enough science in it and enough
Speaker 5: force behind it from the government and everybody else, they
Speaker 5: could get to pressure people. And the guy was a
Speaker 5: weightlifter and fit like I am. And he's not here anymore.
Speaker 5: He was twelve years younger than me.
Speaker 1: Well a lot of times, as the people who are
Speaker 1: involved in the medical community, they really believe in this
Speaker 1: stuff and they believe in the paradigms that it's been.
Speaker 1: And we had a friend of ours, a very dear
Speaker 1: friend of very close to Karen as well. I was
Speaker 1: a friend as well, and she worked in the medical
Speaker 1: field as a registered nurse, and she had breast cancer
Speaker 1: and she absolutely would not even consider anything that was alternative.
Speaker 1: And it's like, you know, this is it, it's got
Speaker 1: a safe profile. Why not try it. It's cheap, it's safe.
Speaker 1: Why not give it a try. You got nothing to lose.
Speaker 1: But she no, I'm only going to do the official
Speaker 1: medical stuff there.
Speaker 5: David David went I went through this for the president
Speaker 5: of our Special Force of Chapter.
Speaker 1: He had cancer.
Speaker 5: I mean a guy worked for ten years in Afghanistan
Speaker 5: handling a lot of the IEDs and disarming them. And
Speaker 5: they have depleted your braumum. And this is something once
Speaker 5: you get into your body, it just virtually never leaves you.
Speaker 5: But he got cancer, double masted ectomy, had both the
Speaker 5: breast removed at him, just got him reconstructed against It
Speaker 5: doesn't look like a freak. But he went totally to
Speaker 5: hyperbury pressure chamber and he went to something called a
Speaker 5: Riffus machine and he said they scheduled him for cats
Speaker 5: gan to go in and get the rest of out.
Speaker 5: What they didn't take out, couldn't find anything. So they
Speaker 5: had a panel of doctor talking to him, and the
Speaker 5: doctors were saying, well we did something right.
Speaker 6: Boy.
Speaker 5: He unloaded on. He said, people are fools. He said,
Speaker 5: you have got blinders on. You didn't do anything. Well,
Speaker 5: we gave you chemo therapy. You don't even read your records.
Speaker 5: You gave me no chemo therapy. Well it must have
Speaker 5: been something else. No, he said, I got rid of it.
Speaker 5: And he's still three years later, he's cancer free to
Speaker 5: whatever degree I mean, he's still urinating what I call
Speaker 5: gold and silver.
Speaker 1: He shows me a coup of these.
Speaker 5: He passes these depleted uranium byproducts out there come.
Speaker 1: Out like gold and silver. Wow. Wow, ropolets and it's horrible. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's amazing. Yeah. I had a friend of mine who
Speaker 1: was in the army with tanks and he was talking
Speaker 1: about depleted uranium and stuff, and so many people have
Speaker 1: been armed by that, and of course they spread it
Speaker 1: all over the all over the countryside, you know, the
Speaker 1: people who live in the country as well. But the
Speaker 1: soldiers are expendable, they don't really care what have these
Speaker 1: people over a long period of time. You know, you
Speaker 1: mentioned earlier food as a weapon, and I think that's
Speaker 1: one of the key things is trying to get some
Speaker 1: independence on food and of course getting your food outside
Speaker 1: of the food supply as well. But you know, you've
Speaker 1: got a lot of stuff there about just basic stuff
Speaker 1: and preparing foods that things that you can put together
Speaker 1: that are going to last a very long time, and
Speaker 1: that you can put together very cheaply as well. Right, absolutely, David.
Speaker 5: More than food revolutions, by history, it has always started
Speaker 5: from empty stomachs. There's a new problem on the scene,
Speaker 5: and that is the water supply system. Probably eighty five
Speaker 5: percent of this country uses municipal water systems. I don't
Speaker 5: know that fact percentage for sure. I have been discussing
Speaker 5: this for years with people. I finally had somebody gave
Speaker 5: me an answer. If you didn't have the chlorine tablets
Speaker 5: come to the city municipal water supply system and the
Speaker 5: guy said, they're trucked in daily, would you put water
Speaker 5: up untreated water?
Speaker 1: He said no.
Speaker 5: The people that are going to go to their tap
Speaker 5: and think, well, I'm hungry, but I'm going to drink
Speaker 5: the water, They're going to turn their tap on. Nothing's
Speaker 5: going to come out at some point. So that's a danger.
Speaker 5: Revolutions come from empty stomach. Total chaos and madness will
Speaker 5: come from people not having water.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I saw something about a military base. I can't
Speaker 1: I'm trying to remember what's where it was, but it
Speaker 1: was a military base that was shut down because somebody
Speaker 1: attacked the water supply a cyber attack. You know they
Speaker 1: I think I recall them. Yeah, yeah, yeah, they shut
Speaker 1: down a military base of a cyber attack on the
Speaker 1: water treatment. They can do it to cities, And of
Speaker 1: course we're seeing this a lot of these types of
Speaker 1: attacks on our infrastructure, especially the water thing. And there's
Speaker 1: just so many points vulnerability. And everything is on the Internet,
Speaker 1: so everything is susceptible to attack from anywhere in the world.
Speaker 1: That's the most amazing thing about it's how vulnerable this
Speaker 1: complicated infrastructure has become. David. People have to store water
Speaker 1: just like food.
Speaker 5: I've got the Rule of Thumb. I've got a whole
Speaker 5: chapter in there, and not only how to store water
Speaker 5: and storing water almost more complex than storing food a
Speaker 5: long term, but I show how you can do it.
Speaker 5: It's quite simple. You need to get some fifty five
Speaker 5: gallon blue barrels. At the least you can do is
Speaker 5: buy cases of water and stick them under a bed.
Speaker 5: This sounds like this sounds like hysteria, but I've been
Speaker 5: through going without water, and I tell you what, It's
Speaker 5: almost like the Indians used to say, you rise from
Speaker 5: your body into the spirit world. You start looking at
Speaker 5: things in your mind is absolutely not functioning properly. You're
Speaker 5: literally starting to go insane.
Speaker 1: How can you How long can you keep the water
Speaker 1: in those bottles before it gets stagnant?
Speaker 5: I think you could probably keep most bottled water.
Speaker 1: For a year.
Speaker 5: I would check it. It's very simple to check. If
Speaker 5: they go to Www. Civil Defense manual dot com. I
Speaker 5: have a whole chapter.
Speaker 1: It's free to read. Read it. Food. I've got food
Speaker 1: on there.
Speaker 5: I'm putting other things on there. But this is something
Speaker 5: that's critical for people to do. I don't want a
Speaker 5: woman coming to my door with a child who's thirsty,
Speaker 5: because once you give your water, they know it's there.
Speaker 5: She's gonna go away and come back. Eventually, you're going
Speaker 5: to have people coming back by force. Now we've addressed
Speaker 5: that situation in my neighborhood. But the bottom line is
Speaker 5: people need.
Speaker 1: To do this.
Speaker 5: It's we are living in We're in a comfort zone
Speaker 5: that hasn't disturbed anybody yet. As much as we don't
Speaker 5: like what we hear, we are still in a comfort zone. Yes,
Speaker 5: we're not short of food, we're not short of water.
Speaker 5: We don't have a soldier sticking a gun up our
Speaker 5: nose and telling us to do this or that. We
Speaker 5: don't right now have anybody trying to forcibly vaccinate us.
Speaker 5: So we're in a comfort zone and people have to
Speaker 5: break loose from that and provide something. It's like an
Speaker 5: insurance policy. I feel like I'm preaching to the choir
Speaker 5: most of the time. Very hard to get this across
Speaker 5: to people.
Speaker 1: No, it is good. And as you point out at
Speaker 1: your website Civil Defense Manual dot Com, you've got that
Speaker 1: chapter on water for free and so people can get
Speaker 1: an example, see an example of how thorough you cover
Speaker 1: a topic there. And that's as you point out, the
Speaker 1: number one issue is having a fresh water because that's
Speaker 1: the thing that's going to kill you first, not having
Speaker 1: anyone got to Yeah, you've got to have a pottable water.
Speaker 1: You've got to be able to treat it. I've got
Speaker 1: all of it. It's very simple. You have.
Speaker 5: Most people have in their house what they need. They
Speaker 5: got a bathtub, put masking tape over the drain. Fill
Speaker 5: the bathtub before the water goes out. You got water
Speaker 5: in your hot water heater brobably thirty to forty gallons.
Speaker 1: You've got a little bit of water.
Speaker 5: In your tank on your toilet. But outside of that,
Speaker 5: you need Every person needs one gallon of water per
Speaker 5: one person for one day. That is the minimum people
Speaker 5: need to survive on. It's not going to allow you
Speaker 5: to bathe, but it's going to allow you to cook,
Speaker 5: drink some water, keep yourself hydrated. Depending on the temperature.
Speaker 5: If it's a nice autumn or nice spring, you don't
Speaker 5: need it as much if it's cold. And I also
Speaker 5: go into cold weather survival in the book. I myself
Speaker 5: didn't know this. I know what it's like in hot
Speaker 5: weather to be without water. You have to hydrate yourself. Well,
Speaker 5: you have to drink more water when it's sub zero
Speaker 5: to hydrate yourself. If you don't do that, you will
Speaker 5: freeze to death. So water, yeah, well I didn't know
Speaker 5: it either.
Speaker 1: Like any freeze for your body, just about it.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's about the same principle to degree. Even the
Speaker 5: water freezes. But if you don't have no water in
Speaker 5: your body, you're making yourself susceptible to freezing. So there's
Speaker 5: other things. You know.
Speaker 1: Communications are very important.
Speaker 5: They're important if you're going to work with a group
Speaker 5: of people to protect your houses. I've got one of
Speaker 5: the best guys in the country. He's written books on this.
Speaker 5: He's got a whole communication chapter in there. I've got
Speaker 5: how to organize your neighborhood for protection. I have what
Speaker 5: I call the Neighborhood Protection Plan. I've got a Navy
Speaker 5: seal officer that you know is a friend of mine,
Speaker 5: Matt Bracken, an extremely good author very very intelligent man.
Speaker 5: He led seal teams in the Middle East. He's written
Speaker 5: two of my chapters. One of them, he has what
Speaker 5: he calls the c W two cube. By that cube,
Speaker 5: you can kind of not kind of, you can determine
Speaker 5: around what your surroundings are, like, what the danger level
Speaker 5: is that you're living in. And it's an incredible it's
Speaker 5: an incredible pictorial he's made. He also wrote my chapter
Speaker 5: on night fighting around your house without having any infrared
Speaker 5: optics or anything like that. This is stuff he learned
Speaker 5: as a seal officer and teaches this stuff.
Speaker 1: So there's a lot of things. Pemmican people don't even
Speaker 1: know what it is. Pemmican is a.
Speaker 5: Northern Southern Canadian, northern our borderline Cree and Micmac Indian
Speaker 5: food that if you've got this stuff, you can live
Speaker 5: for your office. It's got everything you need, protein, carbohydrate,
Speaker 5: trace minerals and a pretty tasty if you make it properly.
Speaker 5: I've got a refue for pemmican in there, and you
Speaker 5: can make it in a cupcake tray and it's it's
Speaker 5: very good, and it's got a shelf life that's almost indefinite.
Speaker 1: That super Yeah, people can see not only the table contents,
Speaker 1: but you've got a lot of bullet items in terms of,
Speaker 1: you know, putting together a neighborhood group, making sure that
Speaker 1: you do it in a smart way. You know, the
Speaker 1: the psychological issues that are involved there with groups as
Speaker 1: well as you know the government's paranoia about things. You've
Speaker 1: got to be careful about both of those things when
Speaker 1: you put it together. Travis has got the website up there.
Speaker 1: People can can see that night fighting without night vision
Speaker 1: and it shows that example there water sources and of
Speaker 1: course that that chapter that is available there. You talk
Speaker 1: about tactics and you mentioned the CW CW two QB.
Speaker 1: Is that what it was is that that Matt Bracken
Speaker 1: had come up with. Tell us a little bit about
Speaker 1: that well.
Speaker 5: Depending and it kIPS into people can call it racist
Speaker 5: or whatever they want, and it's ethnic ethnic phobia or
Speaker 5: whatever they want.
Speaker 1: To it's genophobia.
Speaker 5: The makeup of people around you has a direct bearing
Speaker 5: on the danger level the the ethnic and the racial makeup,
Speaker 5: and that goes for wealthy black people as well. Depending
Speaker 5: if they got a bunch of white trash living around them,
Speaker 5: there's going to be a danger to them.
Speaker 1: If they have money and.
Speaker 5: If they live in a good neighborhood, those are going
Speaker 5: to be the first places people go to for food
Speaker 5: and water. They're going to go out of their areas.
Speaker 5: They're going to be stopping people on the freeways. They're
Speaker 5: going to be taking anything of value. But when it
Speaker 5: comes to water and it comes to food, lookout. If
Speaker 5: somebody's got to feed their child, they're not going to
Speaker 5: care very much about your life. Your life is going
Speaker 5: to instead of being sacretted, it's going to become literally
Speaker 5: valueless to them. And we have too much of a
Speaker 5: mentality of that in this country. I've told you before
Speaker 5: I sat in the police board our gang unit. Nobody
Speaker 5: is allowed to pull their firearm at the policy unless
Speaker 5: you have a deadly threat. Well, our gang unit took
Speaker 5: that off. Why because they were getting shot at by
Speaker 5: these gang bangers and they said they had four in
Speaker 5: a room and they were asking them, I saw a
Speaker 5: video on this what do you guys shoot as freight
Speaker 5: aw it? Well, hey, we're gamers. Let's play video games.
Speaker 5: If you don't shoot right away, you're dead. So they
Speaker 5: had to change the policy to where are these guys
Speaker 5: could have their weapon out? Even though it wasn't an
Speaker 5: evert deadly threat, because that's what would happen. And that's
Speaker 5: the mentality Americans have about shooting people. It's a horrible
Speaker 5: thing to shoot somebody and think about it because it
Speaker 5: never leaves you. But these people have got this knee
Speaker 5: jerk mentality that that's what they've got to do. Put
Speaker 5: their child crying Thursday in the mix of that thing,
Speaker 5: and you got problems.
Speaker 1: And that's going to happen very quickly, with just a
Speaker 1: couple of days. When the supply chains are shut down.
Speaker 1: We have these long supply chains. We have even the
Speaker 1: most mundane things everywhere you've got connected to the internet,
Speaker 1: and so people can tap into that. I talk frequently
Speaker 1: to go Tree, who does cyber security, and he's constantly
Speaker 1: talking to me about how they're probing whoever it is,
Speaker 1: whether it's ransomware or whether it's you know, criminals who
Speaker 1: are doing it, or whether it's other state actors. They're
Speaker 1: constantly probing the infrastructure to see where there's vulnerable places
Speaker 1: in all these different places. And of course they could
Speaker 1: hit everything all at once, and they could do it
Speaker 1: from anywhere on Earth, and they could make it look
Speaker 1: like whoever they want to look.
Speaker 5: Like, Yes, that's what I wanted to thinks that don't
Speaker 5: like about technology. If the trucks don't run and don't
Speaker 5: take colarinated carnation tablets, if the grid goes down, the
Speaker 5: diesel generator that they used to pump water, even if
Speaker 5: you've got a gravity flow system in your neighborhood or
Speaker 5: your area, eventually the water's going to stop. So that
Speaker 5: in conjunction with a myriad of issues. One of what
Speaker 5: I see is three billion people were hacked social security
Speaker 5: numbers information all over yes state actor from Iran, I
Speaker 5: doubt it from the Western globalist I think. So another distraction.
Speaker 5: Everybody's checking to see if they've had a council opened.
Speaker 5: Then you know it's a concern bread and circuses. It's
Speaker 5: all destruction. And I just watched that movie GLADYE the
Speaker 5: other night, and they were talking about the corrupt Senate.
Speaker 1: But they didn't have a Congress other than a Senate there.
Speaker 5: They didn't have a House of representatives, so we got
Speaker 5: a double whammy there. But they were talking about the senators.
Speaker 5: Marcus really is the emperor died was trying to give
Speaker 5: the power back to people and get the corruption out,
Speaker 5: We're going to have to go through a reset. I
Speaker 5: feel I don't want to sound pessimistic, but I think
Speaker 5: that people are going to have to see the reality
Speaker 5: of no food, no water, what's going on in this country. Uh,
Speaker 5: there's going to have to be some force of arms
Speaker 5: before this issue is over. If there isn't, you know,
Speaker 5: we've got Waltzing Kamala and mister Waltz in there and
Speaker 5: that that's that's going to be so sad. But you know,
Speaker 5: I'm not advocating people do anything other than have the
Speaker 5: family shop kind to protect their neighborhood and work with
Speaker 5: their neighbors.
Speaker 1: Uh, there's there's.
Speaker 5: Issues that I get into from a military experience. We
Speaker 5: had something called drake shooting. I show people how to
Speaker 5: do what's called skipping rounds.
Speaker 1: The commando unit I was use this extensively and we're
Speaker 1: very very effective.
Speaker 5: But you skip around, you literally turn a full metal
Speaker 5: jacket bullet into a number of projectile and I got
Speaker 5: a picture.
Speaker 1: Of that here that's from you, and that is after
Speaker 1: you hit that bullet. This is the bullet that's broken
Speaker 1: apart in all these different rounds. Right, yeah, yeah, tell
Speaker 1: people how you do you just hit it on the
Speaker 1: ground that breaks it into well.
Speaker 5: No, I got a diagram of how you do it,
Speaker 5: and it's quite simple to do, but it was very effective.
Speaker 5: We would do it shooting into any potential cover, even
Speaker 5: if we didn't know where somebody was. They probably had
Speaker 5: a beat on us, ready to kill us, but were
Speaker 5: far into these areas without hesitation. Then they all seem
Speaker 5: to think that we'd seen them, and they'd take off
Speaker 5: running and then you know, we'd deal with them. The
Speaker 5: gunship would deal with it.
Speaker 1: But skipping rounds is something that's a small thing.
Speaker 5: I have thirteen pages on how to survive a gun
Speaker 5: You're not going to read this stuff on the internet.
Speaker 1: A lot of the Special Operations.
Speaker 5: Units teach this stuff, but it's not very what I
Speaker 5: went through. I was trained by SASS, which is a
Speaker 5: Brittish special Forces designation Special Air Service. This about the
Speaker 5: same thing as Delta Force in this country or Green Berets.
Speaker 5: And you got taught all of these things. And these
Speaker 5: are little techniques I tell people in the book. They're
Speaker 5: very simple.
Speaker 1: And let me jump in here because on your website
Speaker 1: that I'm looking at here tactics, plane language explanations that
Speaker 1: even people without a military law enforcement background can understand
Speaker 1: tactical strategic principles, effects and movements. And here are the
Speaker 1: examples all around defense fields of fire, interlocking fields of fire,
Speaker 1: supporting fields of fire, element of surprise, force multiplier effect,
Speaker 1: violence of action, economy of force, kill zone, maize, defense
Speaker 1: and depth, flanking attack principles, L shaped ambush, cover and
Speaker 1: fire movement, fall back, fighting positions, area, tactical proactive defense,
Speaker 1: serpentine entry control, perimeter defense and the star Perimeter defense principle,
Speaker 1: indirect approach, strategy, employment and coordination of inside marksmen and
Speaker 1: out flinker marksmen. Rapid response for us. The third dimension
Speaker 1: of the defensive perimeter the castle concept. So all that
Speaker 1: is just under the tactics part of it, and then
Speaker 1: that's not the only thing you talk about. How to
Speaker 1: fortify and defend a suburban neighborhood or a high rise
Speaker 1: building or a ranch. These are all different requirements to
Speaker 1: do this. So if people go to the website they
Speaker 1: can see the kinds of in depth information that you've gotten. Again,
Speaker 1: there's some sample chapters there as well.
Speaker 5: Eighty year old people taking all of that information, there
Speaker 5: is about thirty items there.
Speaker 1: Learning the basic theory, and I've got i grounds.
Speaker 5: It's all in Layman's terms because the military rights books
Speaker 5: that will put you to sleep at night, they seem
Speaker 5: to have a competition on triple and quadruple negative statements
Speaker 5: in one sentence, you know, and fifty fifty eight words
Speaker 5: in one sentence trying to impress each other they went
Speaker 5: to graduating from high school or whatever.
Speaker 1: It's horrible. So I've put it in simple terms with diagrams.
Speaker 1: You can understand it.
Speaker 5: An eighty year old person, a group of eighty year
Speaker 5: old people in a neighborhood could successfully defend their neighborhood
Speaker 5: just with these tactics against somebody that does not have
Speaker 5: the knowledge of these tactics. They're very very important. Fire
Speaker 5: protection procedures are also very important. If we go grid down,
Speaker 5: you're going to see more fires and you're going to
Speaker 5: have a less response.
Speaker 1: From far departments.
Speaker 5: The same thing with sheriff's departments and police departments. What
Speaker 5: are they going to do? The potoma going to stay
Speaker 5: out there? Are they going to worry about their wife
Speaker 5: and kids at home?
Speaker 1: Oh, we've already seen that when you see the riots
Speaker 1: that happen, or you know, even going back to the
Speaker 1: Rodney King riots and anything, but of course also to
Speaker 1: the BLM riots of a twenty twenty anything. They basically
Speaker 1: protect their own and they have a hard time trying
Speaker 1: to protect their own. I mean, look at what happened
Speaker 1: to the police station there in Minneapolis, and they still
Speaker 1: haven't rebuilt it. You know, it is kind of interesting
Speaker 1: to see these things. But you know, the other thing is,
Speaker 1: I look through your book, A lot of people might
Speaker 1: think that you that if they don't live in a
Speaker 1: rural area or maybe even a suburban area, that it
Speaker 1: doesn't apply. But you've got a lot of stuff about
Speaker 1: living in the city and how to survive that. And
Speaker 1: it's not just a situation where the grades down, everybody's
Speaker 1: starving and it's this kind of end of the world
Speaker 1: apocalypse thing. But it's also common sense things to do
Speaker 1: for natural disasters like hurricanes or earthquakes or things like that,
Speaker 1: so that you're not completely the parrel.
Speaker 5: Yeah right, I got the procedures for that, things like
Speaker 5: shutting off your gas supply.
Speaker 1: How are you going to identify word it is, what.
Speaker 5: To do the procedure to go through shutting off your
Speaker 5: breakers if you've got an earthquake. I go over virtually
Speaker 5: every catastrophic evan I've listed twenty three of them, everything
Speaker 5: from financial collapse to the Moon colliding with Earth, which
Speaker 5: you know that's very improbable.
Speaker 1: I leave a lot of this alien this alien talk.
Speaker 5: Just like I say in the book, just because three
Speaker 5: pieces of my Captain crunch aligned perfectly together in my
Speaker 5: cereal bowl on top of the mailk doesn't mean that
Speaker 5: we're going to have a client, We're going to have
Speaker 5: a planet disaster. But I have hurricanes, tornadoes, everything. There's
Speaker 5: common sense and information on what to do to keep
Speaker 5: yourself from burning your house down, to keep yourself from
Speaker 5: having your house explode, and it goes on. It goes
Speaker 5: on all the way up the ladder. How to protect
Speaker 5: your neighborhood, which you're going to have to know how
Speaker 5: to do. I can't I can't convey to people the
Speaker 5: madness that I have seen in the rest of the world.
Speaker 5: We have been so isolated in this country. And I
Speaker 5: talk this madness in the book. I mean and I talked.
Speaker 1: This book is a refuge for people that.
Speaker 5: Are concerned with what's going on today, instead of just
Speaker 5: sitting and stewing in their own juices over how bad
Speaker 5: everything is and how crazy everything is. You'll see through
Speaker 5: this book there's the reason for it. It's called psychological operations.
Speaker 1: And David, you.
Speaker 5: Touch on this all the time when I'll watch you.
Speaker 1: You're very tuned into this. People need to wake up.
Speaker 1: This is not the end of the world.
Speaker 5: We don't have fifty percent of this country that wants
Speaker 5: to have a communist form of government.
Speaker 1: We don't have it.
Speaker 5: I think the Republican Trump, I don't know like to
Speaker 5: get into politics, but the other day he said something
Speaker 5: about his voter base is seventy five percent of the people, and.
Speaker 1: I believe he's right.
Speaker 5: I've always said that it's probably like eighty five percent.
Speaker 5: There are dedicated communists how I run into them in
Speaker 5: military units I've been in. They seem to think that
Speaker 5: this illusion of communism will work, and it doesn't. But
Speaker 5: that's what we're headed towards. And people need to wake up.
Speaker 5: Go to the book and find yourself something to do
Speaker 5: in this book to help yourself allay your fears of
Speaker 5: what is coming.
Speaker 1: That's right, Yeah, I've got As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: I've got a tip here from Sandy Hayes. Thank you
Speaker 1: very much for that. So it's been listening to you
Speaker 1: for a long time. Thanks for all you do. God
Speaker 1: bless I can't help but feel black pilled after listening
Speaker 1: to you sometimes, But I guess that's just the reality
Speaker 1: of the world, isn't it. And so let's say you
Speaker 1: know anybody that feels black pilled. First of all, I
Speaker 1: like to give you a hope that we have as
Speaker 1: a Christians, and that's the most important thing. But it
Speaker 1: is also important if you have a book like this
Speaker 1: and you've got something that you can do, because really,
Speaker 1: the fear just and it comes if you're sitting there
Speaker 1: and feeling helpless, if you're just sitting there not doing something.
Speaker 1: If you're actively engaged and putting something together, constructively putting
Speaker 1: it together, going out and putting to relationships together with
Speaker 1: people in your neighborhood, which Jack talks about, that a
Speaker 1: good deal. So there's all these constructive things to do,
Speaker 1: and these are good things, whether or not the society
Speaker 1: collapses or not. This year, we finally we got totally
Speaker 1: behind and everything Jack as we move, but this year
Speaker 1: we've started growing our own food and everything, and it's just,
Speaker 1: you know, it's been wonderful. Karen has done all of
Speaker 1: it and a whistler here who have been doing this
Speaker 1: stuff while we do the show here. But it's great
Speaker 1: to have that and to be learning about that, and
Speaker 1: it's great to have the fresh produce and things like that.
Speaker 1: So if you start doing productive things like this, it's
Speaker 1: going to it's going to get you feeling better and
Speaker 1: getting you into a more positive mindset. But it's going
Speaker 1: to be stuff that's going to pay dividends even if
Speaker 1: things don't come out in a worst case scenario. That's
Speaker 1: what I like about it, and that's what I like
Speaker 1: about what Jack has done in terms of civil defense manual.
Speaker 1: But being able to set aside some food, just simple suggestions,
Speaker 1: things that maybe you didn't think about, but are just
Speaker 1: simple suggestions that once you read them, there you know
Speaker 1: things that you may have heard if there's some kind
Speaker 1: of an earthquake or something you turn the gas off,
Speaker 1: of course, but maybe you've forgotten about that. Maybe it's
Speaker 1: just good to kind of jog your memory and kind
Speaker 1: of go through a checklist of things like that every
Speaker 1: once in a while. But it's a positive thing that
Speaker 1: you can do and keeps you active, keeps you from
Speaker 1: becoming fearful about all that stuff. I think that's the real,
Speaker 1: the real benefit of it, that's going to pay dividends
Speaker 1: regardless of what happens.
Speaker 5: I can't tell people how much we've turned into a
Speaker 5: garage door community. We go to work, we come home,
Speaker 5: raise a garage door of a car, and close the
Speaker 5: garage door.
Speaker 1: We don't even know.
Speaker 5: Who lives next to us since we've done this in
Speaker 5: our neighborhood.
Speaker 1: I just had a group of people last night, we
Speaker 1: just had a meeting, and.
Speaker 5: I have I have to say, I've never been enriched
Speaker 5: by people. And some of the wonderful people I met
Speaker 5: that I thought were jerks and they're just great people,
Speaker 5: but you never say anything to them because you live in.
Speaker 1: A got garage door type of the neighborhood. People don't
Speaker 1: get together. Well, we've gotten together.
Speaker 5: In our neighborhood and we know who's and there's a
Speaker 5: lot of fantastic people where I live, older people that
Speaker 5: have got experiences. I'll just go to one thing you
Speaker 5: just said, God, Christianity, religion. Right on my desk here,
Speaker 5: I have my Civil Defense Manual, which I've got all
Speaker 5: kinds of markers in, and I have the Bible and.
Speaker 1: The Eternal Defense Manu right there.
Speaker 5: Yes, absolutely, I'm trying to teach my heathen soul something
Speaker 5: about religion. I'm not real good at it, but I'm
Speaker 5: trying to get there. Go to a Bible study group
Speaker 5: with combat veterans. A lot of guys are really, really
Speaker 5: horribly afflicted with the issues they've gone through. When you
Speaker 5: sit and see a grown man cry that was in
Speaker 5: the Marine Corps and been awarded a silver Star, you
Speaker 5: know it's casting stone in your head these traumatic events.
Speaker 1: And I'm telling people, now, prepare or you're going to
Speaker 1: have that cast in your head.
Speaker 5: The failure of doing something to protect you and your family.
Speaker 5: It will be cast in your head and chiseled in
Speaker 5: stone while on a bright sunny day the lights.
Speaker 1: Are going on in your mind.
Speaker 5: You know, when you're dying, you don't want the last
Speaker 5: thought of why I didn't I do something?
Speaker 1: So I urge people.
Speaker 5: I urged people. The funny thing I got to tell
Speaker 5: you is the group we have in our neighborhood. I
Speaker 5: don't go into the Bible because I'm afraid I've I'm
Speaker 5: beyond I'm numb to being afraid.
Speaker 1: I've been through so much.
Speaker 5: I go into the Bible because it's a fascinating story. Yes,
Speaker 5: And I fight with myself all the time. I tell
Speaker 5: the guys in my group, you know, I fight all
Speaker 5: the time.
Speaker 1: With my beliefs. But it's a it's a great thing
Speaker 1: to look at.
Speaker 5: Most of my group of neighborhoods, they're they're all they're
Speaker 5: all very devout religious people of one denomination or another.
Speaker 1: And I don't push them as long as they don't
Speaker 1: push theirs on me, you know. So, well, that's the key,
Speaker 1: you know, when you're talking about that, it's looking at
Speaker 1: something that you're going to find fascinating, something that is
Speaker 1: you know, we it's so caught up so many times
Speaker 1: and passively consuming what has served to us. So we
Speaker 1: get caught up in entertainment, or we get caught up
Speaker 1: in sports. But you know, we can also get caught
Speaker 1: up in things that are going to help us live
Speaker 1: our daily life, things that are going to help us
Speaker 1: to meet our neighbor things that are going to help
Speaker 1: us to know God. Those things can be even more
Speaker 1: fascinating and can pay dividends and to us and so
Speaker 1: and that's the key thing, you know, finding some stuff.
Speaker 1: If you start to get interested in anything, you're going
Speaker 1: to be able to find fascinating stuff and so you know,
Speaker 1: do it even even this prepping stuff. Do it as
Speaker 1: a hobby that's going to be something that's going to
Speaker 1: be uh, you know starting I paid dividends, Yeah, David,
Speaker 1: I pushed so many different things in here.
Speaker 5: I've got a guy the name of Boston Tea Party.
Speaker 5: He's very well known. He's a legislator from Wyoming. He
Speaker 5: gave me permission to put all from one of his books,
Speaker 5: Team pages on Cyclepaths.
Speaker 1: Critical that people know what these people are.
Speaker 5: Critical that they know the traits that they exhibit. So
Speaker 5: they're going to identify these people. They're very, very dangerous.
Speaker 5: That's one of the biggest dangers of humanity I've seen. Unfortunately,
Speaker 5: I think our government has mostly turned into these people,
Speaker 5: and the globals definitely are. I mean, I can't see
Speaker 5: too much different. Bill Gates still look when he looks
Speaker 5: at a person, thinks he's looking at a computer screen.
Speaker 1: I don't think he's got any sense of connection.
Speaker 5: But if people want to learn about psychopathic free those
Speaker 5: pages in there, it'll tell you everything about it.
Speaker 1: You want to learn about how to survive.
Speaker 5: A nuclear exchange, get the book, go on my website
Speaker 5: and look at what I have surviving nuclear warfare with
Speaker 5: what you have, it's very simple. It's no longer what
Speaker 5: I was taught when I was in the Air Force
Speaker 5: when he went through nuclear weapons training. Bend over and
Speaker 5: kiss your butt goodbye. Put it in nice terms. But
Speaker 5: the bottom line was that it was the mutual assured destruction,
Speaker 5: which I don't think we'll ever get to. I hope
Speaker 5: not was. It left me totally depressed. There's just no
Speaker 5: hope coming out of a school like that, and gave
Speaker 5: me a new respect for that bomb that I just
Speaker 5: set my butt on and connect army circuits to. So
Speaker 5: there's a lot of things in the book. It just
Speaker 5: goes over a lot that people need to know. Yeah,
Speaker 5: can you survive Absolutely, people can survive grid down in
Speaker 5: this country.
Speaker 1: You just need some basic some basic preparations. Yes, yes,
Speaker 1: absolutely true. Well, it's always great talking to you, Jack,
Speaker 1: and it is a wonderful publication. Again, as I said,
Speaker 1: we don't have to be fearful, especially if we are Christians,
Speaker 1: and we can always find something that is constructive to do.
Speaker 1: It's one of the best things you can do for
Speaker 1: yourself psychologically. As a matter of fact, there's just an
Speaker 1: article about taking kids off of smartphones for ten daysmediately
Speaker 1: saw a massive improvement in their lives and their attitude
Speaker 1: and their relationship to other people. So again, there's all
Speaker 1: these things that we can do, and it's very important
Speaker 1: and this is a good place to start, really, So again,
Speaker 1: Civil Defense Manual. You can find it at Civil Defensemanual
Speaker 1: dot com. Jack, thank you so much for coming on
Speaker 1: and for all of your wisdom and a great resource
Speaker 1: that you've got there. Thank you. Tell that wisdom part
Speaker 1: to my wife. Thank you, David. Thank you. It's always
Speaker 1: a pleasure to talk to you.
Speaker 5: I just enjoy watching your show and I recommend everybody.
Speaker 1: Thank you very thank you very much. I appreciate that.
Speaker 1: Folks gonna take a real quick break and I'll be
Speaker 1: right back.
Speaker 7: Just a small town boy, saucy and cold, please.
Speaker 2: Stop.
Speaker 1: Believed by all right on rock fan Lazy Toad, Thank
Speaker 1: you very much. He says that ten bucks ain't much,
Speaker 1: but it helps the ticker. Nevertheless, yes it does, Thank you,
Speaker 1: and it is very generous. I appreciate that. Blessings to
Speaker 1: all God's patriots and especially our precious nights. Thank you
Speaker 1: so much. You know, let us talk about not letting
Speaker 1: the people get to us. This is an article out
Speaker 1: of the Daily Skeptic, and I thought it was kind
Speaker 1: of caught my attention because it says dumbhead girl eco activist, dumbhead.
Speaker 1: We don't use that phrase, and I mean the Germans
Speaker 1: do use dumpkof right, which is literally head but talking
Speaker 1: about how to deal with your climate feelings. And in
Speaker 1: this article they talked about an essay that was coming
Speaker 1: from a young woman who said that everything changed for
Speaker 1: her in her twenty twenty two books. She said, to
Speaker 1: climate in our heads, fear, anger, hope, what the ecological
Speaker 1: crisis is doing to us? And it was you talk
Speaker 1: about you know, doom and gloom. This is it and
Speaker 1: she said it all began when she was at school
Speaker 1: and they showed her Al Gore's film An Inconvenient Truth.
Speaker 1: I like at that and I thought that is the
Speaker 1: most ludicrous thing. But the sad thing about it is
Speaker 1: that it scared her to death. And she came home
Speaker 1: she talked to her mother about it and she said, so,
Speaker 1: I said, I was happy for the welcome distraction watching
Speaker 1: a film instead of doing lessons, but afterwards I was
Speaker 1: shocked and I asked my mom. She's British for answers
Speaker 1: all these questions and challenges, and she didn't have any
Speaker 1: solutions for me. How could she? Well, she could because
Speaker 1: the solutions are there. You know, the solutions are there.
Speaker 1: When your kid goes to school and they fill them
Speaker 1: with despair and atheism, you know the solutions are there.
Speaker 1: As a parent, if you are going to send your
Speaker 1: kids to school, you better be aware of how you
Speaker 1: were going to answer these questions that are put into
Speaker 1: their head and to give them a foundation, whether it's
Speaker 1: about that or whether it's about the doom and gloom
Speaker 1: of the climate. She said, I was alarmed. I started
Speaker 1: to think about the impending consequences of climate change and
Speaker 1: what could be done about it. And she said, we're
Speaker 1: questioning now even the role of men. We're questioning social narratives,
Speaker 1: a superiority through gender, through academic attainment, through professional success,
Speaker 1: through the burning of fossil fuels. You see, it all
Speaker 1: ties together with her out of this she took all
Speaker 1: of the marks, this struggle session stuff that was the
Speaker 1: gateway into it for her. But of course it can
Speaker 1: be anything. But the real issue is is that it
Speaker 1: is fear that we have to confront and we have
Speaker 1: to not be afraid to look at the truth, and
Speaker 1: we have to not be afraid to look for solutions,
Speaker 1: especially to be able to provide those to our kids.
Speaker 1: Saw a video on Twitter actually, and it got my
Speaker 1: attention because the headline there was what's the most common
Speaker 1: used phrase in the Bible? And then they show condensed.
Speaker 1: They just foot all the pages and they always have
Speaker 1: it highlighted and always put it in the same spot
Speaker 1: so it's not jumping around, so you can watch it
Speaker 1: because they go through it very quickly, two hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty times. Don't be afraid. Don't be afraid. Actually, that's
Speaker 1: what I like about the King James and the New
Speaker 1: King James. It's got a more majestic claim which just
Speaker 1: says fear not, which I think is much more the
Speaker 1: same thing. But I think it's much more powerful than
Speaker 1: don't be afraid, but that fear not, and we really
Speaker 1: don't have anything to fear. And that is especially true
Speaker 1: if you're a Christian, if you're a child of God,
Speaker 1: if you're God fearing, you don't fear anything else. That's
Speaker 1: the key. That's the key right there. And you don't
Speaker 1: have to fear all of these exaggerated lies from al
Speaker 1: Gore or the crisis of the week or the so
Speaker 1: called pandemic of the week.
Speaker 7: You know you have.
Speaker 1: It gives you a perspective and it gives you a
Speaker 1: foundation that will not be rattled. And that's the key thing,
Speaker 1: that's the key preparation right there. So thank you all
Speaker 1: for listening, have a great weekend, hope to see you
Speaker 1: on Monday.
Speaker 8: Let me tell you the David Night Show you can
Speaker 8: listen to with your ears. You can even watch it
Speaker 8: by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me,
Speaker 8: that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now.
Speaker 1: Yeah, good job.
Speaker 8: And you want to know something else, You can find
Speaker 8: all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to
Speaker 8: the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com.
Speaker 1: That's a website.