Speaker 1: Oh, friend of asir, Hello, and welcome to the show.
Speaker 1: This is the Cult of Conspiracy, and my name is Jonathan.
Speaker 2: I'm Jacob Jacob.
Speaker 1: Give it to the cult members. What are we talking
Speaker 1: about today, sir?
Speaker 3: All right?
Speaker 2: So there I was minding my business, being a child
Speaker 2: of God, as I am known to do from time
Speaker 2: to time, and I was actually watching a Windagon video
Speaker 2: he broke down the conspiracy Iceberg, and it's like a
Speaker 2: three hour and forty five minute video where he just
Speaker 2: goes into like I think it's like seven different tiers.
Speaker 2: Each tier has like thirty something topics and all this stuff,
Speaker 2: and I was just, you know whatever. Some of these
Speaker 2: things sounded interesting. Some of these things sounded really ridiculous,
Speaker 2: and like, that's kind of the point. Some conspiracies are
Speaker 2: based in just internet lore that gets taken a little
Speaker 2: too far. Some of these are based in actual historical
Speaker 2: precedents and things that cannot be denied.
Speaker 3: He brought up this topic called.
Speaker 2: Sycamore knowl Jonathan, have you ever in your life heard
Speaker 2: of sycamore nole?
Speaker 1: It sounds familiar, Actually I hadn't.
Speaker 2: I was thinking, like the grassy knoll or something about
Speaker 2: sycamore trees, and I know, like for esoteric reasons, the
Speaker 2: sycamore tree has some.
Speaker 3: Weight behind it.
Speaker 2: It means something to certain cultures, so like maybe it
Speaker 2: was these things whatever.
Speaker 3: No, not even a little bit. What this has to
Speaker 3: do with at all.
Speaker 2: It is the underwater base that is located just a
Speaker 2: few miles off the coast of Malibu. And I'm thinking, okay,
Speaker 2: this has got to be crazy, right. Well, you know
Speaker 2: what there is images, there is videos. Rob Low and
Speaker 2: his sons led a dive to Sycamore Nole and recorded
Speaker 2: it for the History Channel. As a matter of fact, yes,
Speaker 2: the Rob Low, the actor. So all right, my curiosity
Speaker 2: was too sparked to let go, and especially with what's
Speaker 2: going on in La right now.
Speaker 3: You heard there's another fire that just started up.
Speaker 4: Yep.
Speaker 2: Not to mention now that they have rainfall coming. Do
Speaker 2: you remember I said as soon as there's some water,
Speaker 2: there may be mudslides that happen because of the fires.
Speaker 2: Oh okay, the officials just released that there is a
Speaker 2: drastic mud slide warning in effect right now because of
Speaker 2: the fires. Like this is real life. What's happening. La
Speaker 2: is about to be an absolute parking lot. And I
Speaker 2: think that's all by design, but there have been a
Speaker 2: few reported cases of some I'm not gonna call them UAPs,
Speaker 2: I'm not gonna call them UFOs.
Speaker 3: I'm not gonna call them drones. I'm not gonna call
Speaker 3: them orbs.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna let the people decide what they are because
Speaker 2: all all judgments, you know how I have feelings about
Speaker 2: orbs versus drones and these things. Gonna be straight up
Speaker 2: with you, I can't call this. I have no dog
Speaker 2: in this fight. It could very well be a drone
Speaker 2: in this video. But then there's too many videos of
Speaker 2: things that it's like, MM, are we really sure what
Speaker 2: this is? Then I do the research today about an
Speaker 2: underwater base that they recently scrubbed off of the Google
Speaker 2: Images maps, but you can find images from a couple
Speaker 2: of years ago which did in fact have it, that
Speaker 2: were in effect for decades. So, you know what, we're.
Speaker 3: Gonna break it down. We're gonna talk about it here.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna go ahead and share the screen at this time,
Speaker 2: and it's all the good cult members. I'm gonna tell
Speaker 2: you now, you're gonna want to watch this episode rather
Speaker 2: than just hear it. And if you would like to,
Speaker 2: Jonathan tell them where they can go.
Speaker 1: You can go to patreon dot com slash CULTI of
Speaker 1: Conspiracy podcast or rockfin dot com slash Cult of Conspiracy.
Speaker 1: Both those links are down in the show notes below,
Speaker 1: and that is the best way to be able to
Speaker 1: support the show. That is the only place over at
Speaker 1: patreon dot com slash Cult of Conspiracy Podcast. That's the
Speaker 1: only place that you can join us every Tuesday night
Speaker 1: at nine pm Central for the Cult Member live show.
Speaker 1: And those are always exactly what they are called, live
Speaker 1: as fuck. So if you want to be involved in
Speaker 1: on those kind of conversations, come take a little gander
Speaker 1: and sign up for the Third Eye all the way
Speaker 1: Open Tier. And what's great about having the Third Eye
Speaker 1: all the way up in tier is not only do
Speaker 1: you get to have access for the Tuesday night live shows,
Speaker 1: you'll also be able to listen to the shows completely
Speaker 1: commercial free. You'll be able to have the shows right
Speaker 1: in your pocket literally a couple of days before they
Speaker 1: even come out. And yeah, and you have access to
Speaker 1: be able to basically just be up Jacob's ass all
Speaker 1: day because he answers all those messages like the good
Speaker 1: cult member that he is.
Speaker 2: Sir, I do I do I do apologize good cult members.
Speaker 2: I did let that go by the wayside for far
Speaker 2: too long. But oh no, we are up to date.
Speaker 2: We are staying up to date on it, and I
Speaker 2: am checking it daily. So if you would like to
Speaker 2: have direct messaging to me on behalf of the Cult
Speaker 2: of Conspiracy, not just me to like as Jacob. If
Speaker 2: you're reaching out to me as a representative of the cult,
Speaker 2: please come message us on Patreon. I will be checking them.
Speaker 2: I will be answering. We're having a good time over
Speaker 2: there right now, as a matter of fact.
Speaker 3: So without further ado, I'm gonna play this quick.
Speaker 2: And when I say quick, it's like under two minutes
Speaker 2: of the wind Agoon video on YouTube that broke down
Speaker 2: what Sycamore Nole is. Again, it's a very quick TLDR,
Speaker 2: but it's a good base to go off of.
Speaker 3: Let's listen.
Speaker 5: In is in reference to an underground plateau located six
Speaker 5: miles off the coast of Malibu, California, about two thousand
Speaker 5: feet underwater and so predominant that can even be seen
Speaker 5: from Google Earth. There is this predominant plateau that sticks
Speaker 5: up out of the ground, leaving people to think it's
Speaker 5: an underwater base, even that of extraterrestrial origin. In ninety five,
Speaker 5: people started to point at it and figure out it
Speaker 5: was there, and there was a lot of research happening
Speaker 5: around it at the time. And it turns out that
Speaker 5: this had been kept secret for nearly forty years.
Speaker 2: Okay, so before we go any further, have you heard
Speaker 2: anything of this? Apparently there was explorations in ninety five.
Speaker 1: I don't think I have now that I'm looking at it, like, I, yeah,
Speaker 1: that looks very strange. How have we not come across
Speaker 1: this before?
Speaker 3: I'm telling you, dude.
Speaker 2: And so when I saw that, I was like, Okay,
Speaker 2: I'm so sure there's got to be Internet things and stuff.
Speaker 3: No, the deeper I dug, the more I found.
Speaker 2: And what you are looking at now is a before
Speaker 2: image and an after image. They have scrubbed it in
Speaker 2: the last year. From Google image, you could see the
Speaker 2: little oval plateau here, but the beams and the opening
Speaker 2: are no longer visible from a satellite image. It's not
Speaker 2: that they're not there, it's that they've changed the images
Speaker 2: that are allowed to be shown from the satellite, which
Speaker 2: we do know NASA has done multiple times throughout the years.
Speaker 3: It only makes sense, So I got this good.
Speaker 1: My question is, why are people assuming that this is
Speaker 1: an alien kind of situation? Could there not be a
Speaker 1: human thing we could?
Speaker 3: All right, let's talk about that.
Speaker 2: Is it equally possible that this is a secret underwater
Speaker 2: cave type base for US to dock submarines from. Very possible,
Speaker 2: very possible that this is completely US government military base.
Speaker 2: But and it's only six miles off the coast of Malibu. Like,
Speaker 2: it's not something like nobody can go check out. No,
Speaker 2: you can go in a boat right now and go
Speaker 2: swim on top of it and go deep sea diving
Speaker 2: with tanks and weights and all that and explore it
Speaker 2: for yourself. There's nothing preventing you from doing it. It's
Speaker 2: not quarantined off or like guys who guns are gonna
Speaker 2: come out and stop you.
Speaker 3: Not even a little bit.
Speaker 2: But just people don't really do it because it's kind
Speaker 2: of under the radar figuratively speaking, and not a lot
Speaker 2: of peaceeople actually know about it.
Speaker 3: But it is getting a little bit more traction.
Speaker 1: So this is off the coast of Malibu, was it?
Speaker 2: Yeah, Malibu, which is literally next door to La interestingly enough,
Speaker 2: and I think that that might actually cause this to
Speaker 2: get a little more traction these days, because as we're
Speaker 2: gonna see in videos, I'm gonna play here in a
Speaker 2: little bit, there's some there's some UAP slash UFO slash
Speaker 2: extra dot dot dot going on in the skies above
Speaker 2: the LA fires. Clearly you can't see him during the day,
Speaker 2: but at night it's really hard to hide lights, especially
Speaker 2: when it's being portrayed through smoke, where it's clear that
Speaker 2: something is glowing in the smoke. We will be going
Speaker 2: into it, I promise.
Speaker 1: UFOs as in like, what is the shape they're taking?
Speaker 2: But m you see what I'm saying, I'm jacob Ain't
Speaker 2: saying Jacob Ain't being that guy on this one because
Speaker 2: I cannot verify with my eyeballs what I'm seeing. So
Speaker 2: is it very possible that this is a a a
Speaker 2: drone with some lights on it? Sure, I don't know
Speaker 2: who would be flying a drone over the largest forest
Speaker 2: fire quote unquote wildfire in LA I feel like you're
Speaker 2: with for sixty thousand acres of damage. Probably right, the
Speaker 2: heat would melt the plastic, you know what I'm saying. Now,
Speaker 2: is it equally possible that this might be some sort
Speaker 2: of military craft or a firefighter craft that's doing something.
Speaker 3: Okay, it's possible. I sure as hell have never seen
Speaker 3: one like this before.
Speaker 1: Could it be fire retardant, like you know, some kind
Speaker 1: of metal that can take on maximum amount of heat
Speaker 1: or something like that.
Speaker 2: Maybe, but even still, dude, electric motors do not do
Speaker 2: well in heat. Hell, they put off heat. You put
Speaker 2: an electric motor in a hot situation, it's gonna get torched.
Speaker 2: It's gonna fry the electrics. So I'm that's why I'm
Speaker 2: not calling it one way or another. I'm saying that
Speaker 2: it is fishy. There is way more than enough eyebrow
Speaker 2: raisers to call that there's a flag on the play here,
Speaker 2: and it is our job as Cult of Conspiracy members,
Speaker 2: not leaders, but members.
Speaker 3: We simply must talk about it, sir. So I found a.
Speaker 2: Couple of videos that are going to go a little
Speaker 2: more in depth, and I do apologize some of these
Speaker 2: are more slower. We're not going to play the whole video,
Speaker 2: but this gentleman does a pretty decent job of breaking
Speaker 2: down the before and after and kind of the backstory
Speaker 2: to some of this.
Speaker 3: And we got a couple of articles are going to
Speaker 3: read as well.
Speaker 2: Let's get into it.
Speaker 6: A researcher by the name of Kelly Chase just made
Speaker 6: an interesting discovery. After going to satellite images and checking
Speaker 6: on the Malibu Underwater structure, she noticed that it had
Speaker 6: been completely removed as of right now. Various theories have
Speaker 6: been put forward to explain how the structure was removed.
Speaker 2: All right, real quick, you see on the left that's
Speaker 2: the before This oval shaped plateau has been clearly visible
Speaker 2: for decades from satellite imagery.
Speaker 3: Only in the last.
Speaker 2: Year has the image on the right being what you'll
Speaker 2: see if you go to the Google images or the
Speaker 2: satellite image is right now, the image on the right.
Speaker 3: Is what you will see.
Speaker 1: You know what. It kind of reminds me of the
Speaker 1: picture on the left. It almost looks like Stark Tower,
Speaker 1: like the top of Stark Tower before it got taken down.
Speaker 1: Uh huh did they kind of resemble that? You said it?
Speaker 2: Not me, big dog. I was actually gonna make a
Speaker 2: mention of how this looks like something we may have
Speaker 2: seen in a superhero movie or two, but I agree,
Speaker 2: let's continue.
Speaker 6: Oddly enough, this removal happened after it was revealed by
Speaker 6: an individual passionate about Ham radios. That they managed to
Speaker 6: record and preserve the audio of peculiar radio signals emanating
Speaker 6: from the Malibu structure.
Speaker 2: That's also pretty interesting Ham radio operators, if for anybody
Speaker 2: who doesn't know, it is a subculture still active today.
Speaker 2: I actually have a friend of mine who is a
Speaker 2: avid Ham radio operator, and he's got a couple of
Speaker 2: guys that he radio's back and forth to across the country,
Speaker 2: and I think he's got one or two across the
Speaker 2: world that he might try to reach out to from time.
Speaker 3: And it is.
Speaker 2: It's like a nerddom in and of itself, working on it,
Speaker 2: fixing the components, dialing it in and all that.
Speaker 3: It's it's a dying off.
Speaker 1: Oh they take that shits so serious too. You got
Speaker 1: to be licensed to even have one of those.
Speaker 3: I think, yes, you do.
Speaker 2: You have to be a license Ham radio with your
Speaker 2: own identifier and all these things. So this Ham radio
Speaker 2: operator in California started picking up a signal from the ocean. Now, okay,
Speaker 2: could it be that there was like a sub that
Speaker 2: was popping off a little signal as it was under.
Speaker 3: The water there?
Speaker 2: Yeah, sure, sure, that close to the coast and not
Speaker 2: showing any of the clear identifiers that any other naval
Speaker 2: vessel would be showing.
Speaker 3: Let's continue.
Speaker 6: Mister Emmett, a ninety three year old individual with a
Speaker 6: wealth of experience as an amateur radio operator since nineteen
Speaker 6: thirty eight, reveals that he encounters these signals on a
Speaker 6: daily basis. What's truly remarkable about these objects is their
Speaker 6: remarkable stability, and he said that it's fascinating to observe
Speaker 6: how unwavering they are. This led him to the realization
Speaker 6: that the signal they emit must be in extremely close proximity.
Speaker 6: According to mister Emmett, he utilized a highly capable antenna
Speaker 6: affixed to his four wheel drive truck to trace the
Speaker 6: origin of these signals. Astonishingly, he discovered that they originated
Speaker 6: from a mysterious underwater structure in close proximity to his
Speaker 6: property situated in Florida. This revelation sheds light on the
Speaker 6: presence of an intriguing and mysterious entity beneath the water's surface,
Speaker 6: sparking curiosity and prompting further study. The original structure was
Speaker 6: initially discovered by Robert M. Stanley, an acquaintance of mister Emmett. Stanley,
Speaker 6: an author, posits that the structure in question could potentially
Speaker 6: be a massive, advanced vessel that has remained submerged beneath
Speaker 6: the water's surface for countless millennia. This theory suggests that
Speaker 6: the structure's origins may be rooted in an other worldly presence,
Speaker 6: defying conventional human understanding.
Speaker 2: Now look at the structure. Bro To say that this, and
Speaker 2: they're gonna go into a couple of different theories. One
Speaker 2: of them, I'm just gonna give you the broad overview,
Speaker 2: is a massive flying saucer that got it crashed into
Speaker 2: the ocean and then over time sand and sediment kind
Speaker 2: of filled over the top.
Speaker 3: And okay, fine, I could get down with that.
Speaker 2: Except for the fact that there are pillars holding it up,
Speaker 2: and that you can, as a matter of fact, go
Speaker 2: underneath this plateau.
Speaker 3: It's it's a hollow underneath.
Speaker 1: And it's like multiple pillars too. If you look off
Speaker 1: to the right, look those those seemingly look like pillars too.
Speaker 1: Over there right over here.
Speaker 2: No, that's like that's just the waves kind of making
Speaker 2: the etchings in the sand, if you will, like kind
Speaker 2: of things. But over here we can clearly count one, two, three, four, five, six,
Speaker 2: seven pillars and I'm sure there is more over here
Speaker 2: that again are covered up by sediment that are holding
Speaker 2: up this plateau and have been holding it up for
Speaker 2: a who honestly knows.
Speaker 1: Is it supposed to be like people? So people have
Speaker 1: gone down there? Is it seemingly like a stable structure.
Speaker 2: We will be discussing it because when Rob Lowe and
Speaker 2: his sons did this dive, they sent a I guess
Speaker 2: like an underwatered rover type of situation. Cameras and things
Speaker 2: and things didn't exactly go according to plan. But I
Speaker 2: am getting ahead of myself. We will be discussing all
Speaker 2: that in a minute. Let's continue.
Speaker 6: According to Stanley, there is a suggestion that the peculiar
Speaker 6: object in question might potentially serve as a stargate, which
Speaker 6: is essentially a wormhole utilized by advanced beings to travel
Speaker 6: to Earth. He further asserts that the United States government
Speaker 6: maintains a constant investigation into this intriguing phenomenon by employing
Speaker 6: many submarines that are operated by their personnel. According to
Speaker 6: Nigel Watson, a renowned author, there exists a plethora of
Speaker 6: rumors and narratives surrounding hidden advanced facilities located underground and
Speaker 6: underwater across the globe. Of particular intrigue is the Malibu Structure,
Speaker 6: which has sparked an entire cascade of theories and conjecture.
Speaker 6: The phenomenon surrounding these alleged bases has captivated the imagination
Speaker 6: of researchers and enthusiasts alike, delving deep into the realm
Speaker 6: of the unknown and giving rise to a comprehensive exploration
Speaker 6: of possibilities and speculations.
Speaker 2: Look at that image, dude, It's literally only blurred out
Speaker 2: right where the object in question is located, and the
Speaker 2: surrounding ears like if you're going off the coast of Malibu.
Speaker 2: You can see the shelf, you can see the drop off,
Speaker 2: you can see all of that. Everything's fine, everything's crystal clear,
Speaker 2: except for this one blurry blob. And this is currently
Speaker 2: what you'll see if you look it up on satellite imagery.
Speaker 1: And this is the problem that a lot of people
Speaker 1: who like to research online that come across. It's like,
Speaker 1: you know, if it's just a harmless, like weird structure
Speaker 1: underwater that was seemingly made by waves or maybe some
Speaker 1: kind of you know, some kind of rocks fell into
Speaker 1: this formation, it's just a weird coincidence. You wouldn't need
Speaker 1: to cover this up, You wouldn't need to blur it out,
Speaker 1: But for some reason they need to blur things out
Speaker 1: that there's nothing there that doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 2: Anomalies in nature happen all the time, allegedly. Now, of course,
Speaker 2: there's people like us who question these things, but it's
Speaker 2: not unheard of that nature be doing nature shit sometimes
Speaker 2: and things look a little weird and like, huh, that's interesting,
Speaker 2: but there usually is a decent explanation. They couldn't even
Speaker 2: come up with one for this. They just decided to
Speaker 2: blur the image and cover it up, even though there's
Speaker 2: allegedly US government submarine expeditions that go down here pretty
Speaker 2: regularly to either a explore or b possibly communicate. So
Speaker 2: was sure was.
Speaker 1: This place this structure discovered by people looking onto Google
Speaker 1: maps or was it known about before that it was?
Speaker 2: I forget what he said as far as when it
Speaker 2: was first like known about, But apparently where is signals
Speaker 2: coming off of it that can be picked up from
Speaker 2: ham radios? Oh all right, well, at least as long
Speaker 2: as somebody's been dialed in looking for that signal they've
Speaker 2: known something was out there.
Speaker 1: Damn. Okay, well, let's continue, ma'ham.
Speaker 6: Author Robert M. Stanley maintains that in twenty ten, while
Speaker 6: examining Google Maps on his computer, he stumbled upon what
Speaker 6: he perceives to be an ancient structure. Intrigued, he reached
Speaker 6: out to an old acquaintance residing in that vicinity, only
Speaker 6: to discover that this individual had been aware of the
Speaker 6: structure's existence for a decade. It was revealed that this
Speaker 6: friend had been documenting ham radio signals emanating from the structure,
Speaker 6: leading him to speculate that it might be a colossal
Speaker 6: spacecraft that has found its abode in this location, possibly
Speaker 6: since ancient times. This revelation not only highlights the serendipitous
Speaker 6: nature of Stanley's discovery, but also raises fascinating questions about
Speaker 6: the potential origin and purpose of this strange structure.
Speaker 2: I will say this, in ninety five, that's when the
Speaker 2: confirmed exploration to this structure happened, and apparently this amateur
Speaker 2: ham radio operator knew of its existence into as early
Speaker 2: as the early or late nineties.
Speaker 1: Okay, so way before Google Maps then, right now?
Speaker 3: How long was it known about in secret?
Speaker 2: Before that? Who's to say, but at least it started
Speaker 2: making its way into the zeitgeist in the mid to
Speaker 2: late nineties. But I have a feeling we're gonna learn
Speaker 2: a little bit more about the backstory.
Speaker 1: That other picture that they showed too, that was more
Speaker 1: like parallel to the ground. Dude, that one's even more
Speaker 1: phenomenal than this picture. Like that really like this is
Speaker 1: really cool, don't get me wrong, But the other picture
Speaker 1: is like you get a better look at it that way.
Speaker 2: Now. I don't know where that image came from, but
Speaker 2: I can confirm that none of the images that are
Speaker 2: shown in this video are AI none. So I don't
Speaker 2: know if that's like an artist rendition of it, the
Speaker 2: one that's like parallel to it, like if you're in
Speaker 2: the water looking at it, or if that's like somebody
Speaker 2: took the satellite image and kind of tilted it.
Speaker 3: A bit to give it that angle.
Speaker 2: I have no idea, but I can confirm that none
Speaker 2: of this is AI generated.
Speaker 3: So take that for what you want.
Speaker 6: Let's keep going, whether a base or a spaceship. Robert
Speaker 6: claims it is in perfect alignment with several megalithic monuments
Speaker 6: in Malibu, and it fits in with the oral legends
Speaker 6: of the Chumash that claim this area was flooded twelve
Speaker 6: thousand years ago. Robert also thinks the US Navy knows
Speaker 6: about this base, as there are many rumors that they
Speaker 6: operate many submarines inside ancient lava tubes along the California
Speaker 6: coast that are linked to underground military bases in the
Speaker 6: Mohave Desert. Upon further contemplation, Robert ponders the possibility that
Speaker 6: the phenomenon he encountered could potentially serve as a gateway,
Speaker 6: a wormhole, or even a stargate. The examination of this
Speaker 6: phenomenon unveils an immersive understanding of the Malibu underwater base,
Speaker 6: shedding light on the intriguing question of a presence in
Speaker 6: our under.
Speaker 1: Okay, now, look at that those pillars that I was
Speaker 1: saying off to the right. That doesn't seem to be
Speaker 1: just waves. That seems to be like another haul of
Speaker 1: pillars over there off to the right. Now, doesn't it
Speaker 1: it very well?
Speaker 3: Maybe?
Speaker 2: And if you look at the satellite image, that area
Speaker 2: is blurred as well. It's not just a square over
Speaker 2: this one plateau. It goes down the coastline a little bit.
Speaker 2: All those other etchings or pillars or whatever that might be.
Speaker 2: The other forms of this structure are also blurred. Very interesting.
Speaker 7: I have.
Speaker 1: Way too early guests already about what this could be.
Speaker 2: Okay, hold on, do you want to give it now
Speaker 2: or do you want to wait to hear more information
Speaker 2: and maybe make speculations at the end. I'm good either way.
Speaker 1: Well, let's see if it evolves over time. Okay, So
Speaker 1: is it possible that what we're looking at rate here
Speaker 1: is some kind of ancient civilization that God taken up
Speaker 1: like it got flooded, it went underwater. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: it landis I'm not going that wild, but there are
Speaker 1: certain land masses that go underwater over periods of time.
Speaker 1: And if this could be dated back to two, three, four,
Speaker 1: five thousand years ago, and if we were to find
Speaker 1: out that, like people five thousand years ago, six thousand
Speaker 1: years ago were building these kinds of structures, that would
Speaker 1: paint our history and humanity in a completely different light,
Speaker 1: which could possibly be the reason why they're trying to
Speaker 1: blur out the picture.
Speaker 3: I could see that.
Speaker 2: I mean, hell, look at Doggerland. We did a whole
Speaker 2: episode about that, which confirmed is a giant land mass
Speaker 2: that had a thriving civilization that about twelve thousand years ago,
Speaker 2: if I do remember correctly, or ten thousand years ago,
Speaker 2: got hit with a massive tidal wave and fell under
Speaker 2: the sea, which it still is today. The Native American
Speaker 2: tribes of this area's ancient stories do talk about how
Speaker 2: a water a big the oceans rose and this area
Speaker 2: was flooded and all these things. If they were living
Speaker 2: on the coastline before that flood happened, which of course
Speaker 2: they would, duh, it would make sense that this would be.
Speaker 3: One of the ancient indigenous structures. Was that a part
Speaker 3: of it all? Is this completely separate?
Speaker 2: Is this the halls of some ancient temple that have
Speaker 2: since been utilized to be an underwater military base?
Speaker 3: That's what I'm saying. There's so many possibilities on this.
Speaker 1: This could be the Mermaids bro.
Speaker 2: This could be actually Atlantis. I don't know now. Granted
Speaker 2: this is on the far other side of California. Plato,
Speaker 2: who was writing about Atlantis, was talking about how it
Speaker 2: was just past the Straits of Gibraltar, which is where
Speaker 2: Spain and Africa almost touched tips. This is like across
Speaker 2: an ocean and across a whole other continent.
Speaker 3: So like, okay, I get that the continuity of this
Speaker 3: is very very yeah.
Speaker 2: But very thin.
Speaker 1: I don't know, all ancient civilizations don't always have to
Speaker 1: be Atlantis. Like some people get a little crazy with that,
Speaker 1: you know, Like sure, I believe that Atlantis was probably
Speaker 1: a real thing, like just like the Land of MoU
Speaker 1: and all that shit, But like, does that necessarily mean
Speaker 1: that all you know, land and all structures were Atlantian?
Speaker 1: Not necessarily. That's like saying that's like going to New
Speaker 1: York or going to America and thinking that you're gonna
Speaker 1: go visit the Empire State Building in Idaho, Like maybe not.
Speaker 2: I mean, how many people have we talked to this say, like,
Speaker 2: look at this old building. It says it was built
Speaker 2: in the eighteen hundred, it's clearly a tartarian structure, Like
Speaker 2: I okay.
Speaker 3: Sure that.
Speaker 1: I mean, e theory, this could be tartaria too.
Speaker 2: We don't know, Okay, who's to say, right, this is
Speaker 2: covered under the ocean and under sediment, so who knows
Speaker 2: what this looked like in its original form. Petra is
Speaker 2: an example of this that it just looked like a
Speaker 2: giant cave until we started digging a little bit and
Speaker 2: found all these gorgeous sculptures and the structures themselves and
Speaker 2: all this. Who knows what this structure's original look was,
Speaker 2: but we do know what it currently looks like today.
Speaker 3: It's fascinating shit, bro.
Speaker 2: So it's very possible that this was some sort of
Speaker 2: ancient religious structure, ancient defensive structure, could be from extraterrestrial entities,
Speaker 2: could be because of ancient Native American building techniques. I mean,
Speaker 2: there's all kinds of cave dwelling structures that we have
Speaker 2: found that they've carved into the cave walls in around
Speaker 2: the Grand Canyon.
Speaker 3: Correct.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, oh yeah. There's certain doors within the Grand
Speaker 1: Canyon seemingly like archways, like massive archways for only like
Speaker 1: only like giants would need like those big ass archways
Speaker 1: of a door to walk through.
Speaker 2: Rope, Look at this archway, Look at these this pillars,
Speaker 2: these doors. What kind of creature would need this big
Speaker 2: of a doorway to walk through? Circa twelve thousand years ago?
Speaker 2: This You see what I'm saying. When I started doing
Speaker 2: the digging on this, I'm like, oh, we simply must
Speaker 2: do and talk about this, bro.
Speaker 1: Let's go all right, yeah, let's keep on learning.
Speaker 6: The remarkable discovery took place approximately six miles off the
Speaker 6: majestic coast of Point Doom in Malibu, California. An intriguing
Speaker 6: object residing on the ocean floor conspicuously boasts an oval
Speaker 6: shape and impressive size. In fact, upon examining the Google
Speaker 6: Earth images, it is revealed that this mysterious structure is
Speaker 6: nothing short of colossal, stretching over a remarkable distance of
Speaker 6: approximately three miles. It showcases distinctive features such as pillars
Speaker 6: and an expansive entrance, fueling curiosity and prompting the emergence
Speaker 6: of numerous theories to elucidate its existence. Intriguingly, websites dedicated
Speaker 6: to unidentified objects and the paranormal have ventured into the
Speaker 6: realm of speculation, advancing the notion that this mammoth structure
Speaker 6: may in fact serve as a base for both unidentified
Speaker 6: flying objects and unidentified submerged objects.
Speaker 3: Okay, real quick, that oval shape has a diameter of
Speaker 3: six miles.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, really.
Speaker 2: Let that one sink in. So this is found six
Speaker 2: miles off the coast of Malibu. If you were to
Speaker 2: take that shape and put it like on top of
Speaker 2: each other it would reach the coast. It is as
Speaker 2: wide around as it is far from the coast. Holy shit,
Speaker 2: that changes the perspective of those pillars. And this opening
Speaker 2: a little bit, doesn't it. That's not like, oh, a
Speaker 2: thirty foot opening, bro.
Speaker 1: I mean, I was probably maybe thinking, I don't know,
Speaker 1: two hundred yards wide, possibly something like that. But it's
Speaker 1: six fucking miles. Oh my god, dude.
Speaker 2: That I mean, it boggles the mind. And then that's
Speaker 2: the thing. If you were to say, hypothetically, mister science man,
Speaker 2: that this was some sort of a natural anomaly and
Speaker 2: here's the reason why. Oh, there is a rock structure
Speaker 2: and all of this and this, Okay, it's six miles wide.
Speaker 2: There's plateaus like this around the world.
Speaker 3: I get it.
Speaker 2: We could have that conversation. But they could never explain
Speaker 2: the entrance. They could never explain the pillars. They could
Speaker 2: never explain what's underneath it. And underneath it is not
Speaker 2: exactly a safe place to traverse. You can, there's no
Speaker 2: laws preventing it. But even the most expert divers have
Speaker 2: steered away from this, either a they don't know about it,
Speaker 2: or be it's like the unknown of it all, and
Speaker 2: if something goes wrong under that, what are you gonna do?
Speaker 3: Flipp or your ass? Like, let's say you even.
Speaker 2: Got halfway underneath it, So you're three miles underneath this pillar,
Speaker 2: underneath this disc, and if something goes wrong and you
Speaker 2: lose air, what are you gonna do? You can't you
Speaker 2: can't figure it out and swim three miles along the
Speaker 2: surface and then go up.
Speaker 3: You'd be fucked.
Speaker 2: So it's kind of it's too dangerous, but not actually
Speaker 2: too dangerous.
Speaker 3: It's more like at your own risk.
Speaker 1: Well, and you know that there's got to be some
Speaker 1: living creatures in there. I mean, even if it's not
Speaker 1: humans or aliens, there's got to be like some crabs,
Speaker 1: maybe some like you know, sea life or whatever you
Speaker 1: know exists on that side. But it's the Pacific Ocean,
Speaker 1: so pretty much anything can really exist right there, as
Speaker 1: long as it's you know, saltwater creature.
Speaker 2: But could it also be a place where submarines secretly dock?
Speaker 1: I was thinking that too. Could it be like kind
Speaker 1: of like a submarine garage at that point?
Speaker 3: That That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 2: There are so many possibilities on it, and none of
Speaker 2: them necessarily sound more or less crazy.
Speaker 3: Than the others.
Speaker 2: The fact that it is emitting radio signals that can
Speaker 2: be picked up tells me that at least in some way,
Speaker 2: shape or form, there is technology associated with this. Is
Speaker 2: that man made, is that extraterrestrial, Is that ethereal? We
Speaker 2: don't absolutely know for sure, but we know that there
Speaker 2: is more to it than it just being a random
Speaker 2: anomalous nature or naturally made structure that cannot be No
Speaker 2: naturally made structure is putting off a ham radio signal. No, sorry,
Speaker 2: that's not how that works, you know. So all right,
Speaker 2: we don't have to continue reading or listening to this
Speaker 2: when we do have more things to get through. Let's
Speaker 2: do this. The US Geological Survey reveals the truth about
Speaker 2: the Malu Malibu Underwater Base.
Speaker 8: Her first clans. The object does look to resemble that
Speaker 8: of a building with what appears to be large pillars
Speaker 8: holding up the bulk of the object. The discovery was
Speaker 8: made six miles of the coast to Point June in Malibu, California.
Speaker 8: The object pretty much sits on the seabend, looks to
Speaker 8: be over in shape, and is pretty large. Images revealed
Speaker 8: this object is in fact massive, measuring in at around
Speaker 8: three miles in length.
Speaker 2: Excuse me, three miles in diameter not six my bad,
Speaker 2: fucking huge.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 8: Having what appears to be pillars and even a large entrance,
Speaker 8: it's not hard to imagine why various theories have been
Speaker 8: put forward to try and explain it. According to various
Speaker 8: websites that look into UFOs and the paranormal, they suggest
Speaker 8: that the massive structure is a UFO in USO Bays.
Speaker 8: Many people have heard of unidentified flying objects, but many
Speaker 8: may not be aware of unidentified submerged objects. These are
Speaker 8: unidentified flying objects that are seen in and around oceans,
Speaker 8: with some people even claiming that they've seen these crafts
Speaker 8: entering the water without making a splash. It's not just
Speaker 8: random people who have reported seen these crass either. People
Speaker 8: in the military seen these large UFOs enter the water
Speaker 8: without making us sound and even reported them staying under
Speaker 8: the water for several hours. It's these types of reports
Speaker 8: that of course some to think that this base is
Speaker 8: under the oceans that these crafts use, and that perhaps
Speaker 8: they could be part of something much bigger. These usos
Speaker 8: are reported to look very similar to UFOs, and it's
Speaker 8: coursed on to question whether the two are different or
Speaker 8: whether normal UFOs have the ability to go underwater without
Speaker 8: being detected regardless. When the underwater discovery was found, it
Speaker 8: was hailed as being one of the best discoveries in
Speaker 8: regards to usos and that it may us prove that
Speaker 8: they do exist after all. One UFO research has said
Speaker 8: the following about the discovery. I think I was the
Speaker 8: same as many people when I first saw this, and
Speaker 8: that was that I couldn't believe this was rettle. At first,
Speaker 8: I thought it was vain, but the object is very
Speaker 8: much What's interesting about this discovery is how artificial elerms.
Speaker 8: I've seen reefs, cliffs and other underwater structures, but there's
Speaker 8: something about this that looks different. As many have pointed out,
Speaker 8: it seems to have giant pillars, as if it's this
Speaker 8: that holds up the structure itself. This and the many
Speaker 8: reports made around the air of UFOs has caused it
Speaker 8: to be a horsepond, and you can't blame people for
Speaker 8: thinking this may be connected to UFOs and us owns.
Speaker 8: One thing that stands out is how the object itself
Speaker 8: looks like a giant UFO. When you look at it
Speaker 8: from a bird's point of view, it looks to be
Speaker 8: oval shamed. Everything here also looks as though it was made.
Speaker 8: It looks symmetrical. When you view things in nature, even
Speaker 8: things that humans have built, they hold their shame. For example,
Speaker 8: when people discover things like shims, we're still able to
Speaker 8: tell that is a ship. So that's another thing about
Speaker 8: this object that stands out the fact that it looks
Speaker 8: to be a type of building end quote. However, not
Speaker 8: everyone agrees with the idea. This is linked to US owns,
Speaker 8: with David Schwartz of the US Geological Survey coming forward
Speaker 8: in seeing the following, I didn't see anything special about it.
Speaker 8: I think it's because it looks like there's a flat surface,
Speaker 8: and then below it it looks like there's these vertical columns.
Speaker 8: So somebody can say, I think this is an entrance
Speaker 8: to something special. I think it's natural. And as part
Speaker 8: of the continental shelf, it's just a complicated part of
Speaker 8: what's now offshore, and that it seems some erosion and
Speaker 8: maybe slumping when perhaps this was partially exposed when sea
Speaker 8: level was lower. This is a really major earthquake area,
Speaker 8: and perhaps some of these features are a result of
Speaker 8: slope failures, which is to shaking. This now flag under
Speaker 8: the water. This says, I'm an entrance to an alien veins.
Speaker 8: There's nothing unnatural looking about it. It's just showing some
Speaker 8: sort of variation in the offshore coastal morphology.
Speaker 2: Okay, let's just go ahead and break down what the
Speaker 2: official US Geological Survey dude just said. He says that
Speaker 2: there was nothing special about it, but he also acknowledged
Speaker 2: it's flat, it's smooth, there's pillars, but there's nothing saying
Speaker 2: that this doesn't look natural.
Speaker 3: Bro, What.
Speaker 1: Uh I mean? Did he he's just saying that from
Speaker 1: looking at the pictures or he actually went there.
Speaker 2: I'm not one hundred percent on his particular research or
Speaker 2: what his view on this was based on, but either way,
Speaker 2: he is saying that he's trying to throw every bit
Speaker 2: of the normalcy into it. Well, this is a high
Speaker 2: earthquake area, and you, I know, it could have done this,
Speaker 2: and maybe that's why this, you know, maybe maybe when
Speaker 2: the waters were lower, this was a semi submerged strut thing.
Speaker 2: But there's nothing saying that there's an entrance here. Never
Speaker 2: mind the fact that you just acknowledge that there's massive
Speaker 2: pillars and that it is absolutely a real object. Yeah,
Speaker 2: totally natural, nothing nothing to see here. Bro, What kind
Speaker 2: of bullshit are you trying to spew here? Brother?
Speaker 1: So is this supposed to what was it? Six miles
Speaker 1: off the coast?
Speaker 2: Yeah, six miles off the coast of Point Dune if
Speaker 2: you want to look it up in particular, and as
Speaker 2: a matter of fact, while you're doing that, dude, also
Speaker 2: look at how far away Malibu is from LA or
Speaker 2: how far this object is from LA. Because my, oh,
Speaker 2: may a picture's worth a thousand words. Anyway, we don't
Speaker 2: need to we're watching any more of this video. That
Speaker 2: was kind of all that was associated with.
Speaker 1: Well, just out of my own curiosity, I was like,
Speaker 1: all right, because they're always talking about the sea levels arising,
Speaker 1: and especially being off the coast of California, I was like,
Speaker 1: maybe an interesting question would be if this is something
Speaker 1: that used to be on land and not just in water,
Speaker 1: maybe you know, recession could have or is it called
Speaker 1: recession whenever the water's rising up like that onto the land,
Speaker 1: whatever it's called.
Speaker 2: Let's say coastal erosion. But this wouldn't be from erosion.
Speaker 2: This would be from the sea levels rising. So yeah,
Speaker 2: I'm not sure what the technical word is.
Speaker 1: So global warming. Yeah, I don't think it's global warming.
Speaker 1: I think it's a natural event that's happening. But anyway,
Speaker 1: I was curious about it. Says sea levels along the
Speaker 1: coast of California are rising at a rate of up
Speaker 1: to one inch every ten years. So and that's up
Speaker 1: to meaning the maximum amount, yeah, you know, per year.
Speaker 1: So I was like, all right, well, if it's six
Speaker 1: miles off the coast, how many inches are in six miles,
Speaker 1: because then we'd be able to get maybe that would
Speaker 1: be the amount of years ago that this could have
Speaker 1: been on land, just you know around about.
Speaker 2: Which Also, those sea level rising up to inch every
Speaker 2: ten years, that's a more recent thing that two hundred
Speaker 2: years ago.
Speaker 3: That was not the case allegedly. So let's see what
Speaker 3: would the math be on that, Jonathan.
Speaker 1: Six miles there are three hundred and eighty thousand, one
Speaker 1: hundred and sixty inches and six miles, so that would
Speaker 1: be three hundred and eighty thousand years ago by that math. Now,
Speaker 1: that's that's to assume it's an average of one inch
Speaker 1: per year. Maybe some maybe maybe there was like an
Speaker 1: event where there was a thousand inches in one year
Speaker 1: or something like that. You never know about the math,
Speaker 1: but just that would be interesting if it is, you know,
Speaker 1: one inch per year three hundred and eighty thousand years ago.
Speaker 1: I mean, some people have said, dude, this fucking this
Speaker 1: earth has been here for millions of years. I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't know what everybody. I don't know what the
Speaker 1: agreed upon number is on that. I don't know if
Speaker 1: we'll ever really be able to get to that. But
Speaker 1: like it would it be crazy if somebody told you
Speaker 1: that there were people here three hundred and eighty thousand
Speaker 1: years ago, five hundred thousand years ago, something like that.
Speaker 2: That wouldn't be that crazy to me. I'm not I
Speaker 2: have weird opinions as far as how old the Earth
Speaker 2: is and how old human life is on this earth.
Speaker 2: A lot of Christians think that I'm crazy for my beliefs.
Speaker 2: A lot of scientific people believe that I'm crazy for
Speaker 2: my beliefs. I'm I'm somewhere in the middle on that.
Speaker 2: I like, I wouldn't be surprised if the Great Flood,
Speaker 2: Noah's Flood, if you want to call it, that happened,
Speaker 2: you know, fifteen thousand years ago, and like that was
Speaker 2: the Great Reset, and somewhere around ten thousand BC's when
Speaker 2: humanity kind of got their footing back, so to speak.
Speaker 2: The native tribes of this area are saying that twelve
Speaker 2: thousand years ago that water rise happened, So that also
Speaker 2: kind of falls in line with closer to what I
Speaker 2: believe is more along the lines of the truth.
Speaker 3: But then that's the thing. When you get to three point.
Speaker 2: Eight billion years ago, bob pop bap okay, you're throwing
Speaker 2: out a number that is incomprehensible to the human mind.
Speaker 2: You might as well say twenty two billion years ago.
Speaker 2: It could equally be that far away for us in
Speaker 2: our perspective, you know what I mean?
Speaker 1: Right right, I don't know. I'm it would be pretty
Speaker 1: fastating to find out that humans, like human humans, not
Speaker 1: like the pre humans or whatever, like the fucking Neanderthals
Speaker 1: or whatever. But I'm talking about the humans. Be interesting
Speaker 1: if that was like a thing, you know, even one
Speaker 1: hundred thousand years ago, nonetheless five hundred thousand years ago.
Speaker 1: So I guess the point that I'm trying to make
Speaker 1: is that by that math, it would be three hundred
Speaker 1: and eighty thousand years ago. If people were peopling three
Speaker 1: hundred and eighty thousand years ago and this is a
Speaker 1: structure that was left behind. That would be fucking awesome.
Speaker 1: That would be awesome. But that's also like a crazy claim.
Speaker 2: And I'm not saying crazy making it sound like too
Speaker 2: incredulous to believe. I'm saying that is a that would
Speaker 2: be an earth shattering in history shattering truth to come out.
Speaker 3: Would it not?
Speaker 1: I mean, pretty good reason to blur that image out, then,
Speaker 1: wouldn't it.
Speaker 3: Mm.
Speaker 2: Now, that's the other thing. The reason why the blur happened.
Speaker 2: Is it because it is proof of some sort of
Speaker 2: ancient intelligence. Is it proof of some sort of extraterrestrial
Speaker 2: influence on Earth? Is it proof of military installations under
Speaker 2: the water that they don't want people to know about.
Speaker 2: That's there's so many working possible theories, and none of
Speaker 2: them are any more or less credible than the other.
Speaker 2: And they reason that they're the fact that they are
Speaker 2: giving us no answers on this.
Speaker 3: Even the experts are saying, oh, yeah, it's totally a
Speaker 3: natural thing. You could tell because there's a lot.
Speaker 2: Of earthquakes in the area and uh, you know, play
Speaker 2: tectonic shifts and then the sea levels rising.
Speaker 3: That is clearly just a natural structure.
Speaker 2: Nothing, nothing to see here, nothing extraordinary about it. Like
Speaker 2: you just sound like a pompous prick at that point,
Speaker 2: Like what are you talking about, mister us geological survey
Speaker 2: ball way, that makes no sense?
Speaker 1: Uh yeah, I don't buy that. Uh I I'm almost
Speaker 1: leaning toward the same people that blurred this image out
Speaker 1: probably got to that guy. That's where I want to
Speaker 1: take it, because you know, you would put somebody like
Speaker 1: that at the forefront, like a geological survey kind of guy.
Speaker 1: You know, that's the people that you would want to
Speaker 1: learn about this kind of stuff from. And so yeah,
Speaker 1: if you're part of the cover up team, that's probably
Speaker 1: the first guy you're going to, because that's who the
Speaker 1: people would go to.
Speaker 2: Sounds like your third eyes all the way open, good man.
Speaker 2: All right, now, this was seven days ago. Fox twenty
Speaker 2: six News has a UFO sighting that sparks intrigue over
Speaker 2: the Central Valley Skies in California.
Speaker 3: Let's watch this.
Speaker 2: And this is where I'm starting to get a little
Speaker 2: I'm not sure, Jonathan. This is where I'm starting to
Speaker 2: question some narratives right now. I'm not calling this a drone,
Speaker 2: I'm not calling it a plane. I'm not calling it
Speaker 2: an orbit. I don't know what the fuck to call this.
Speaker 2: All right, let's let's just see.
Speaker 9: For ourselves and some strange sightings over Fresno the past
Speaker 9: few days. One is a confirmed unidentified flying object caught
Speaker 9: on camera that the Mutual UFO network called an interesting find.
Speaker 9: Fox twenty six reporter Rich Rodriguez shows us the UFO
Speaker 9: and another sighting that had the flight tower and pilots
Speaker 9: talking Tuesday afternoon.
Speaker 10: Friday morning, while you were sleeping, our Fox twenty six
Speaker 10: tower camera caught this light in the sky just after
Speaker 10: four am. As our camera pulls back, the light appears
Speaker 10: to be over downtown Fresnel. We sent video links to
Speaker 10: Earl Gray Anderson with the Mutual UFO.
Speaker 11: Network, where you see that object move. At the clip
Speaker 11: that it moves and then it's hovering again. That's very interesting.
Speaker 11: And no, we don't get a whole out of those.
Speaker 11: That one I would probably actually give an unknown classification
Speaker 11: to which is a UFO.
Speaker 10: Anderson says there were no space launches on Friday. He
Speaker 10: adds that no unusual stars or planets could be seen either.
Speaker 11: What I thought was very interesting about that second video
Speaker 11: is the clip that it suddenly moves. I'm not sure
Speaker 11: what distance we're looking at there. It wasn't light speed
Speaker 11: or anything like that, but that is awfully fast.
Speaker 2: You got an.
Speaker 11: Interesting capture there. Somebody saw what I would technically call
Speaker 11: a UFO.
Speaker 10: Four days later, another strange sighting over Fresno. A private
Speaker 10: pilot had this exchange with the Frosno tower Tuesday afternoon.
Speaker 12: The pressure come on two of the things. Do you
Speaker 12: have any dron activity on your radar?
Speaker 13: Bay?
Speaker 7: Come on five ty tango.
Speaker 4: We wouldn't pick up drone activity on the radar.
Speaker 11: We filter small stuff out.
Speaker 10: A minute later, the tower contacts the Fresno police helicopter
Speaker 10: that's flying over the city.
Speaker 12: Just kind a report of a drone at forty one
Speaker 12: and Herndon, about three miles west of north northwest of
Speaker 12: uth and if you can go check that out for me.
Speaker 12: We're apparently we're going to call for Geral ahead up
Speaker 12: their people.
Speaker 10: The tower then reports to pilots in the area a
Speaker 10: drone was spotted near forty one and Herndon. It was
Speaker 10: flying at roughly three thousand feet. A second pilot called
Speaker 10: in to report the object was following him at thirty
Speaker 10: five hundred feet. The first pilot to alert the tower
Speaker 10: called in again with an unusual sighting miles away.
Speaker 12: I think I thought I bought something over downtown about
Speaker 12: three thousand, five hundreds.
Speaker 11: You saw something over downtown at thirty five hundred.
Speaker 6: Correct, it was like a white object by my TANKO.
Speaker 11: How long ago was this?
Speaker 12: I just lost it right now.
Speaker 10: We reached out to the FAA in Fresno for more
Speaker 10: information on Tuesday's unusual sighting by pilots, but we have
Speaker 10: yet to hear back. Rich Rodriguez Fox twenty six News.
Speaker 3: I don't know what to make of this. Brother, Gonna
Speaker 3: be very honest with you.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what, Jacob. I actually I'm gonna go
Speaker 1: soft on you this time, because the thing is, and
Speaker 1: the thing is is that I'm a very stubborn person.
Speaker 1: It takes me a little while to really wrap my
Speaker 1: mind around certain things until I can learn how to
Speaker 1: coagulate and fit it into certain compartments within my mind.
Speaker 1: And I I feel like you're just as maybe even
Speaker 1: more stubborn than I am. And so you kind of
Speaker 1: have to come around to this information and this understanding
Speaker 1: on your own. Nobody else is gonna tell you what
Speaker 1: to look for, what it is what it isn't. You
Speaker 1: kind of just got to come to it on your own,
Speaker 1: and that's okay. I just want you to know that
Speaker 1: I love you, brother, and I'm happy you finally got here, sir.
Speaker 3: Fair enough, fair enough.
Speaker 2: Now that being said, I have there's no uh on
Speaker 2: the ground on the you know, people with their cell
Speaker 2: phones recording it and saying like, oh, look at that,
Speaker 2: it's making this shape or oh we can't hear.
Speaker 3: It or whatever.
Speaker 2: Like in New Jersey. There's so many videos of so
Speaker 2: many different things, and I'm not even saying one hundred
Speaker 2: percent on all of those because you have to question
Speaker 2: the accuracy of the camera, what's the distance, what all
Speaker 2: of these things?
Speaker 14: Right?
Speaker 3: Got it?
Speaker 2: That was air traffic control and a pilot in the
Speaker 2: air reporting back. And the fact that it was on
Speaker 2: the news quote unquote mainstream media that didn't give it
Speaker 2: more validity to me, what the fuck.
Speaker 1: They're celebrating, they're celebrating you kind of around.
Speaker 2: Yeah, let's see if I can make the fireworks happen
Speaker 2: that used to be what would happened this? Damn Never mind,
Speaker 2: my phone's being speared fingers, yo, Do spear fingers make
Speaker 2: things happen.
Speaker 1: I don't know. That'd be cool if it did, but no,
Speaker 1: I I you know what, if you would stop sharing
Speaker 1: the screen. There's a video that I wanted to share
Speaker 1: for you. It was actually sent to me by Electro
Speaker 1: Nick and he actually specifically asked me to show it
Speaker 1: to you, sir, because you're somebody that might get a
Speaker 1: little something out of it. So there's a video that
Speaker 1: was actually let me see if I can find it here. Okay,
Speaker 1: here we go. So all right, this is actually on Twitter.
Speaker 2: But this is a video.
Speaker 1: This is the New Jersey. Mayor Michael Melhem says that
Speaker 1: he's witnessed glowing orbs transforming into blinking drones. The mayor, kay,
Speaker 1: see what's up.
Speaker 14: I've recently been watching and spent some time with the
Speaker 14: videographer out of Long Island. I mean he has orbs,
Speaker 14: these glowing orbs of light on camera that as you
Speaker 14: watch them right before your eyes, they seem to transform
Speaker 14: into a mechanical drone. So I've actually watched it myself,
Speaker 14: where these orbs are glowing balls of light, different blinking
Speaker 14: lights all over the place, and as it gets closer
Speaker 14: to you, you actually see it transform into a drone.
Speaker 14: Whether it's a drone from the beginning and it's being
Speaker 14: obstructed by bright light, I can't tell you, but it
Speaker 14: is cause for concern. We have looked at flight tracker data.
Speaker 14: We don't see any airplanes in the skies. These things
Speaker 14: are absolutely some kind of phenomenon that's happening just over
Speaker 14: our homes. We need answers, and we need them quickly.
Speaker 15: Yeah, and that's so important to note that you know
Speaker 15: you are looking at flight tracker data and not seeing
Speaker 15: records of this. So mayor are you confident that we
Speaker 15: will start to get some definitive answers, whatever those answers
Speaker 15: may be.
Speaker 14: I believe we're going to get answers, calls or speculation.
Speaker 14: I said, whether they're gonna be definitive answers or not.
Speaker 14: I do take the President at his word. I do
Speaker 14: think that we are going to get some kind of disclosure.
Speaker 14: Listen to government speak. I've listened to our state New
Speaker 14: Jersey speak. I've listened to a federal government speaking. They've
Speaker 14: been very specific at times. They've said things like, it's
Speaker 14: not our DoD, it's not our homeland security. And I've learned,
Speaker 14: and being in this business for a while, that when
Speaker 14: government speaks very specifically, listen to what they're not saying.
Speaker 14: So when they say it's not DoD and it's not
Speaker 14: a homeland security, they're not saying it's not a private
Speaker 14: contractor they're not saying a lot of different things there.
Speaker 1: So they're giving themselves some plausible.
Speaker 14: Deniability when they say things specifically like that. However, I'm
Speaker 14: still fairly sure that this is probably going to be
Speaker 14: our government assets, as the President said when he was
Speaker 14: president elected.
Speaker 2: Even now, if it was a.
Speaker 14: Foreign adversary, I'm almost certain with a trillion dollar military budget,
Speaker 14: we'd be able to take these things out of the sky.
Speaker 14: The fact they're not coming out of the sky and
Speaker 14: we keep seeing them, I truly believe that we will
Speaker 14: find out, whether it's sooner or later, that it is
Speaker 14: probably some kind of government asset.
Speaker 1: All right, Well, he was kind of all over the place,
Speaker 1: but I was just happy to see that this guy
Speaker 1: was saying the same thing that a lot of other
Speaker 1: people have been saying, Like, Look, we saw the orb
Speaker 1: and we saw it transform into a drone. Now could
Speaker 1: have just been the view of which we're looking at it.
Speaker 1: Could it have been a drone the whole time? This
Speaker 1: shit is so high up in the air, we won't know, right,
Speaker 1: but it's just interesting, Like some of the videos are
Speaker 1: so profound when you look at them, and I like
Speaker 1: that he left it open.
Speaker 2: Like that though he is saying he's witnessed with his
Speaker 2: own eyes, first person account of an ORB transforming into
Speaker 2: a mechanical structure. And he even gave the Creeden and
Speaker 2: seou Look, maybe it was just impeded by the other
Speaker 2: lights and all these things. It may have been an
Speaker 2: optical illusion. Either way, it goes I agree with what
Speaker 2: he was saying. Also, when the government is speaking in definites,
Speaker 2: it's more important to listen to what they are not saying. Yes,
Speaker 2: they are not saying it is definitely not extraterrestrial. They
Speaker 2: didn't say that, no, not one time.
Speaker 12: No.
Speaker 14: No.
Speaker 2: They are not saying that it's not private contractor they
Speaker 2: are not saying it's not an essay. They're saying it's
Speaker 2: not DoD and it's not homeland security. That's about all
Speaker 2: they're saying. So a lot of open possibilities. This is
Speaker 2: it equally possible of what's going on in California right
Speaker 2: now off the coast of Malibu with this secret base
Speaker 2: just there.
Speaker 3: I mean, who's to.
Speaker 1: Say, brother, I have no idea. I wish there was
Speaker 1: some kind of video of some kind of alien spacecraft,
Speaker 1: some kind of UFO uIP whatever they're called nowadays. It
Speaker 1: would be interesting to see them go directly underwater at
Speaker 1: this location.
Speaker 14: Now.
Speaker 1: I know people have said that they've seen shit like
Speaker 1: that off the coast of this area, but it would
Speaker 1: be so cool if it was like right there.
Speaker 2: You know, we're I got a couple other videos are
Speaker 2: gonna pull up here in a few and we're gonna
Speaker 2: see some of these potential drone potential orbs. I'll say this,
Speaker 2: I've never seen a drone be able to move that
Speaker 2: fast that accurately. We'll get into it, I promise you.
Speaker 2: My perspective may have been shifted by this whole ordeal
Speaker 2: off of a random fine from a Windagon video. Brother,
Speaker 2: I'm telling you that is what we do here at
Speaker 2: the Cult of Conspiracy. When we find things that just
Speaker 2: need to be talked about, it's.
Speaker 3: Time to make an episode about it.
Speaker 1: So curiosities tend to lead to rabbit holes, sir, That's
Speaker 1: usually how it works.
Speaker 2: They do, all right, So this day article off of
Speaker 2: the Los Angeles Almanac, underwater alien base off of Malibu.
Speaker 2: Here we go. If there's anything to be learned from
Speaker 2: the early twenty twenties, it's to never underestimate the ability
Speaker 2: of people to have a runaway imagination. We don't, however,
Speaker 2: want to get in the way of little, harmless runway
Speaker 2: imaginations as long as it doesn't threaten life, health, property,
Speaker 2: or democracy. Fair enough, less than three miles off of
Speaker 2: the Venturia County coastline, or just under five miles southwest
Speaker 2: of Malibu in Los Angeles County, exists an unusual underwater
Speaker 2: geologic formation about two thousand feet below the ocean surface.
Speaker 2: Now that's another interesting point too. This big, big object
Speaker 2: is three miles wide in diameter and is two thousand
Speaker 2: feet below the ocean surface. And it is that clearly
Speaker 2: visible from saddlle lights, the object, the pillars, all of
Speaker 2: these things two thousand feet under the ocean surface.
Speaker 1: Well, this is saying that it's three miles off the coastline,
Speaker 1: So that would you know, if we're doing the inches
Speaker 1: per mile kind of situation, that kind of cuts it
Speaker 1: in half at that point, So we would be if
Speaker 1: we're doing it from if we're doing looking at it
Speaker 1: from that angle would be like one hundred and sixty
Speaker 1: thousand years at that point.
Speaker 2: But even still, it's like, okay, so three miles off
Speaker 2: the coastline is when you first hit the structure. The
Speaker 2: structure is three miles wide itself. You know what I mean.
Speaker 3: It's six miles off the coast to get to those
Speaker 3: entrance in those pillars.
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, you see what I mean.
Speaker 2: So but both could be true at the same time.
Speaker 2: You know what I mean, because that plateau is a
Speaker 2: flat surface. If it crested on the six mile mark,
Speaker 2: it would have made its way to the three mile
Speaker 2: mark relatively quickly. It's a flat surface. So I see
Speaker 2: where they're going with this. But neither here nor there.
Speaker 2: Let's go Geographically named Sycamore Nole, it is located at
Speaker 2: geographic coordinates thirty four degrees.
Speaker 3: I don't really know how to read lap long very well.
Speaker 2: I believe in the Marine Corps I was decent at
Speaker 2: reading maps, but not anything like I used to. Thirty
Speaker 2: four by one twenty three point thirty one north and
Speaker 2: one hundred and eighty one degrees by thirty nine forty
Speaker 2: five point sixty four degrees west. It is enormous close
Speaker 2: to three miles across in more than two miles wide,
Speaker 2: it covers almost five square miles, just a little smaller
Speaker 2: than the area of Culver City. According to geologists, it
Speaker 2: is simply an unusual geologic formation. To some, however, Sycamore
Speaker 2: and Mole Sycamore Knole is an giant underwater alien base.
Speaker 2: Sycamore Nole appears to stand out from surrounding underwater topography.
Speaker 2: It is easy to see how one can imagine it
Speaker 2: to be a giant, artificially constructed, flat roofed, oval shaped
Speaker 2: structure with supporting columns. Jimmy Church of the Fade to
Speaker 2: Black podcast apparently thought so. In twenty fourteen, he featured
Speaker 2: a video contending that Sycamore Nole is not natural, but
Speaker 2: rather extraterrestrial. He speculated that it could be one of
Speaker 2: the biggest centers of UFO activity found since Roswell, New Mexico.
Speaker 2: It should also be noted that, according to the privately
Speaker 2: operated National UFO Reporting Center, nearby Malibu has had a
Speaker 2: relatively high number of UFO sidings, including a number along
Speaker 2: the coast and some of identified objects emerging from the ocean.
Speaker 2: In twenty fourteen, Lee Spiegel of the Huffington Post wrote
Speaker 2: an article about the speculation surrounding Sycamore Noll. He reached
Speaker 2: out to David Schwartz of the US Geological Survey, who
Speaker 2: wrote a two thousand and nine paper for the Geological
Speaker 2: Survey of America on geology of Southern California's offshore coastline region.
Speaker 2: Schwartz maintained that Sycamore Nole is entirely natural and, despite
Speaker 2: its unusual appearance, was shaped by geological and ocean.
Speaker 3: Forces at play along our coast.
Speaker 2: Statements from credible scientists like Schwartz usually have a way
Speaker 2: of taking the steam out of accelerating imaginations. Nevertheless, the
Speaker 2: idea of underwater UFO bases operating right off our coastline
Speaker 2: with a alien craft ascending and descending the depths does
Speaker 2: seem pretty exciting. Here we have the actual Google image
Speaker 2: picture right. This is what it was before they blurred
Speaker 2: it out this article. Ah, no, matter of fact, let
Speaker 2: me say when it was written. Let's see twenty twenty one. Okay,
Speaker 2: so this is an image from twenty twenty one, and
Speaker 2: I think it's kind of been you know, cleaning up
Speaker 2: a little bit. But this image is what it looked
Speaker 2: like beforehand, and if you were to look at it
Speaker 2: bro this, if you didn't know what you were looking for,
Speaker 2: unless you knew what to look for as far as
Speaker 2: the oceans were concerned, that would kind of just look
Speaker 2: like a rock. You wouldn't know that that was three
Speaker 2: miles wide.
Speaker 1: No, you definitely wouldn't.
Speaker 2: And then you also wouldn't see the pillars from this
Speaker 2: unless again, you were zoomed in and you knew what
Speaker 2: you were looking for. So and now here's a little
Speaker 2: different image, a little closer of the Sycamore Knoll, as
Speaker 2: it has been affectionately called, a little closer image. Here again,
Speaker 2: these are some of the images that we were seeing
Speaker 2: on those YouTube videos, not done by AI ladies and gentlemen,
Speaker 2: not even a little bit. Now, he did bring up
Speaker 2: the Huffington Post article, and wouldn't you know it, I
Speaker 2: happen to have it right here. This is from Lee Spiegel.
Speaker 2: This was written in June nineteenth of twenty fourteen, The
Speaker 2: Truth behind the Malibu Underwater Alien Base quote unquote. It
Speaker 2: says a little more than six miles off the coast
Speaker 2: of Point Doom in Malibu, California, an unusual looking structure
Speaker 2: sits on the seabedfloor. Based on images obtained from Google Earth,
Speaker 2: the oval shaped object has a huge flat top and
Speaker 2: what appears to be pillars or columns that seem to
Speaker 2: reveal the entrance to a darker, inner place. The anomaly
Speaker 2: for the moment, we'll call it that approximately two thousand
Speaker 2: feet below the surface of the water, measuring nearly three
Speaker 2: miles wide.
Speaker 3: What exactly is this thing?
Speaker 2: According to the website of a California based radio program,
Speaker 2: Fade to Black, this may be the holy grail of
Speaker 2: UFO slash USO that researchers have been looking for over
Speaker 2: the last forty years. Now, that's another thing we hear
Speaker 2: a lot of UFOs and UAPs USO is not a
Speaker 2: very commonly used acronym. However, how many reports have we
Speaker 2: heard of, Jonathan, just in the years that you and
Speaker 2: I have been doing this show, of people saying that
Speaker 2: these orbs or these floating triangles or whatever the case,
Speaker 2: they go straight into the water and just go down, down,
Speaker 2: down down. Or you'll have somebody on a dock somewhere
Speaker 2: that there will be some lights that are forming at
Speaker 2: the bottom of where they're fishing. That's kind of crazy.
Speaker 2: And then they get closer and closer, and then they
Speaker 2: pop out and they zoom off without a sound.
Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, I mean, they don't seem to make physical sense,
Speaker 1: scientific sense. It's almost like they're operating within like a
Speaker 1: different realm, almost like the physics doesn't apply to these objects.
Speaker 1: Whatever it is. Maybe they do apply. Maybe they just
Speaker 1: figured out a way to combat the physics. I don't know.
Speaker 2: I mean, but we have had so many examples of
Speaker 2: cars that are able to go underwater, or cars you
Speaker 2: could drive into the water and then it becomes a boat.
Speaker 2: They're submergibles all the time. And that's within the realm
Speaker 2: of our own human engineering. Why would we think that
Speaker 2: aliens or whatever the case may be wouldn't have that
Speaker 2: ability as well. That sounds crazy to me.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's possible that we were made in their
Speaker 1: image anyway, so let's find I mean, it wouldn't be
Speaker 1: that crazy that aliens would be a lot like us.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna go all religious and say that they
Speaker 1: were made in our image or we were made in
Speaker 1: their image, or whatever the case may be. But I
Speaker 1: mean I would imagine through all of the creatures, at
Speaker 1: least on Earth, I mean, sentient life would persist best
Speaker 1: in a body like this over like being a dog
Speaker 1: or like a polar bear or some shit. Right, we
Speaker 1: got thumbs, We can walk around, we can fit into
Speaker 1: smaller places.
Speaker 3: I don't know, I think OCTOPI might also have a
Speaker 3: dog in that fight.
Speaker 2: As far as being sentient sea life that might be
Speaker 2: closer to extraterrestrial life.
Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, they can be the terrestrials.
Speaker 3: And this is the the Octopize world we're just living,
Speaker 3: you know what, I mean, who knows?
Speaker 1: I mean, dude. The way that they can just like
Speaker 1: camouflage themselves as bad ass. I wish I could do that.
Speaker 2: And the way that they are completely sentient and smart
Speaker 2: enough to know what's going on, escape their enclosures, piss
Speaker 2: off their zoo keepers, all of these things. Like it's
Speaker 2: it's anyway. We're getting off in the weeds on some
Speaker 2: shit here. But let's continue reading this huff Post article.
Speaker 2: Jimmy Church, the host of The Faded Black and on
Speaker 2: the Dark Matter Radio Network, told the Huffington Post one
Speaker 2: of his listeners, someone named Maxwell, contacted him last month
Speaker 2: with a Google Earth image showing something odd underwater off
Speaker 2: the coast of Malibu. Church then asked the graphic designer
Speaker 2: Dale Romero Romero to capture as many angled images of
Speaker 2: the anomaly as he could. I needed him to find
Speaker 2: a way to get under and above the water, Church said,
Speaker 2: my first impression was that it was Greek. It looked
Speaker 2: artificial and it didn't look natural. Now, I don't know
Speaker 2: if just because it was pillars that he thought they
Speaker 2: were Greek, but like multiple cultures have used pillars to
Speaker 2: hold up ceilings that I don't know why he would
Speaker 2: initially think Greek. But fine, that's.
Speaker 1: Probably I'm I probably you know, I would think that too,
Speaker 1: you know, just initially because the Greek came the Greeks
Speaker 1: came before the Romans, right or they round the same time.
Speaker 2: No Greeks came before well, the Greeks are around the
Speaker 2: same time the Romans were. But like, for instance, the
Speaker 2: Romans claimed their lineage is based off of the Greek
Speaker 2: story of the Iliad and the Aeneid, which is where
Speaker 2: Romulus and Remus came from, and Romulus is where Rome
Speaker 2: came from, so it's they trace their origin story back
Speaker 2: that way, even though there's very very scant historical evidence
Speaker 2: to back that up. It was like the legend that
Speaker 2: became the myth that became the story.
Speaker 3: Kind of thing.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah, but okay either way.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so ancient Greece does predate ancient Rome on, so
Speaker 2: you could see famousness, so you.
Speaker 1: Could see why he might have said Greek then at
Speaker 1: that point, But and after this article, I did pull
Speaker 1: up Google Earth on this on this image right here.
Speaker 1: Well we can look at that after too.
Speaker 2: All right, hell ya, he said it didn't look natural
Speaker 2: when you're looking at it from above, it is nearly
Speaker 2: a perfect oval shape. Church continued. In the natural surroundings,
Speaker 2: nothing is symmetrical. Everything is ended and covered in rocks
Speaker 2: and sloping peaks, and right here for two miles it
Speaker 2: is a perfect oval with a black separation or.
Speaker 3: Outline to it.
Speaker 2: I have to fully agree with what he's saying there.
Speaker 2: It just stands out that it has to be some
Speaker 2: type of roof. It's not unlike a dome stadium or
Speaker 2: a covered indoor racetrack or an Olympic arena. It's got
Speaker 2: that field to it. It looks like a perfect oval,
Speaker 2: man made structure sitting on a construction site. Again, I
Speaker 2: have to agree with him. Using Google Earth coordinates, which
Speaker 2: are by the way, we already read those Church and
Speaker 2: Romero came up with a series of images starting from
Speaker 2: the due south looking north all the way around and
Speaker 2: ending up at due north looking back south. As unusual
Speaker 2: as this anomaly appears is alien UFO base. The only
Speaker 2: realistic explanation for it that he's got the quote from
Speaker 2: the Geological Survan. Once again, let's go ahead and read
Speaker 2: what this gentleman had to say on it, because this
Speaker 2: is wild quote, and this is from David Schwartz of
Speaker 2: the US Geological Survey Group. I didn't see anything about it,
Speaker 2: or I didn't see anything special about it. I think
Speaker 2: it's because it looks like there's a flat surface and
Speaker 2: then below it it looks like there are these vertical columns.
Speaker 2: So somebody can say, oh, this is an entryway or
Speaker 2: something special like yeah, no shit, Sherlock. He says, uh,
Speaker 2: I think it's natural, and it's part of the continental shelf.
Speaker 2: It's just a complicated part of what's now offshore that
Speaker 2: has seen some erosion and maybe slumping when perhaps this
Speaker 2: was particilarly partially exposed.
Speaker 3: With sea level when it was lower.
Speaker 2: This is a really major earthquake area, and perhaps some
Speaker 2: of these features are a result of slope failures due
Speaker 2: to shaking. If this was a high earthquake area, those
Speaker 2: pillars wouldn't be standing holding up this massive two to
Speaker 2: by three mile wide.
Speaker 1: Disc unless it all unless it all broke off as
Speaker 1: one giant piece though, Is that a possibility or even
Speaker 1: still would crumble.
Speaker 2: Okay, So like the disc itself, Let's say that that
Speaker 2: was a platzau that was higher up the shelf and
Speaker 2: when an earthquake happened, it slid into the ocean and
Speaker 2: it maintained its disc like shape.
Speaker 3: Okay, I could, I could at least buy that a
Speaker 3: little bit.
Speaker 2: That doesn't explain the pillars holding it up, right, because
Speaker 2: if that was the case, there wouldn't be pillars that
Speaker 2: were built into it to hold it up parallel to
Speaker 2: the surface of the water, you know, I mean, it
Speaker 2: would have a downward trajectory to it.
Speaker 3: It'd be slowed.
Speaker 2: There may be some of it sticking out, but not
Speaker 2: all of it. That that doesn't sound natural at all,
Speaker 2: even by natural means. It just it doesn't check out
Speaker 2: to me personally.
Speaker 1: No, absolutely not like this is absolutely something. It's not
Speaker 1: just nothing, that's for sure, no way.
Speaker 2: All right, So let's see this is the image of
Speaker 2: the topographical map of the ocean floor, says. The following
Speaker 2: image is from the paper that Schwartz submitted in two
Speaker 2: thousand nine that he shared with the Huffington Post. If
Speaker 2: you look at to the left of the middle of
Speaker 2: the illustration, you can clearly see the oval shaped quote
Speaker 2: unquote anomaly some referred to as an underwater UFO base.
Speaker 2: So even on the officially recognized Geological Ocean Floor Survey Group,
Speaker 2: you can see this disc is higher in elevation than
Speaker 2: everything else around it.
Speaker 3: That is, that's insane to me.
Speaker 1: Well, it would be if it's if it's held up
Speaker 1: by pillars, you know exactly.
Speaker 3: But that's my point.
Speaker 2: Usually when you're looking at a topographical map, the highest
Speaker 2: peak is the smallest circle, and as you go wider,
Speaker 2: it gets wider and wider. There's like it looks like
Speaker 2: tree rings almost to get to a certain elevation. There
Speaker 2: is no tree rings that lead up to this. There's
Speaker 2: a little bit of around one side, a little bit
Speaker 2: around this side, but it's not like this would be
Speaker 2: a naturally forming plateau in the middle of the ocean
Speaker 2: that you would see rings on all sides of something
Speaker 2: like that was the case.
Speaker 1: So this being a three mile long platform that is
Speaker 1: at the top right the roof of this structure.
Speaker 2: Sure, it's like three miles by two miles. That's why
Speaker 2: it's like five square. It's like an oval shape, not
Speaker 2: a perfect circle.
Speaker 1: Fine, fine, right, right, So then do they get into
Speaker 1: like how tall the pillars are?
Speaker 2: Let's keep reading. I'm not exactly sure, to be honest
Speaker 2: with you. It is interpreted as a thrust fault, Schwartz said,
Speaker 2: meaning one side of the crust moves up and over
Speaker 2: the other, and what we're looking at is interpreted as
Speaker 2: being the surface expression of the doom thrust, which is
Speaker 2: part of the large fault systems in Soullther, California. The
Speaker 2: bottom line, he added, is that people have recognized this.
Speaker 2: Could that be the final truth of what this object is?
Speaker 2: I'm gonna be honest with you, personally, I don't think so,
Speaker 2: because if that was the case, this line wouldn't exist.
Speaker 3: You see what I'm saying. There wouldn't be a defined
Speaker 3: backside to it.
Speaker 2: If it was a slide off and it was just
Speaker 2: a ledge an underwater cliff, which does happen naturally from
Speaker 2: plate tectonic shift from time to time and erosion and
Speaker 2: these things. Sure we could have that talk, it wouldn't
Speaker 2: be raised on all sides. It wouldn't be able to
Speaker 2: be viewed as it is in all directions.
Speaker 3: Bro'.
Speaker 1: That's also also it seems even yeah, you know what
Speaker 1: I'm saying, like it seems like it's level.
Speaker 3: Yes, that that which would naturally happen.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that would definitely inside by pillars and its level underwater.
Speaker 3: Sorry, bro, miss me with the.
Speaker 1: Bullshit, right.
Speaker 2: He says the pictures are a bit misleading and that
Speaker 2: it looks as though it is on the shore.
Speaker 3: West toldoff Post.
Speaker 2: My first reaction, knowing that it was a two thousand
Speaker 2: feet under the water, was that under no circumstances could
Speaker 2: it in fact be artificial man made?
Speaker 3: And I have enough experience looking.
Speaker 2: At geology and discuss distinguishing between what could perhaps be
Speaker 2: artificial and then there's sort of a gray area in between.
Speaker 3: As far as I'm concerned, there is no gray area.
Speaker 2: Wes says he's inclined to go along with the geological explanation.
Speaker 2: It doesn't look at all man made. It has what
Speaker 2: looks like like pillars there, but they're unevenly spaced.
Speaker 3: And then to the right.
Speaker 2: You see other seemingly pillars still attached actually to the
Speaker 2: bedrock in the process of the forming. So pillars just
Speaker 2: naturally form themselves under a shelf these days due to
Speaker 2: plate shifting.
Speaker 1: That's new and uniformly like. They're not like tilted pillars.
Speaker 1: These things are straight up and down, like you would
Speaker 1: think over the process of time, if this is a
Speaker 1: naturally occurring thing, you might get one pillar that decides
Speaker 1: to lean over some time or so, one pillar that
Speaker 1: would be shorter than the others due to waves crashing
Speaker 1: into it or something. Right, But yeah, these seem to
Speaker 1: be standing the test of time even at that.
Speaker 2: His argument is that they're unevenly spaced apart from each
Speaker 2: other because he is looking at this. I'm gonna be
Speaker 2: that guy real quick. He's looking at this through human eyes,
Speaker 2: because if a human builds it, it would be perfectly
Speaker 2: spaced alone. Because we like the aesthetics of things. This
Speaker 2: I don't believe was done for esthetics, dude. I believe
Speaker 2: this was done for practical reasons. They put the pillars
Speaker 2: where they needed the weight to be hailed up, regardless
Speaker 2: if that was you know, twenty feet in this direction
Speaker 2: and the next one's forty five feet in that direction
Speaker 2: or not. It's this is not a Roman colisseum. This
Speaker 2: isn't some temple that was built. And the designers were
Speaker 2: very clear that it had to meet these specifications, right right,
Speaker 2: I mean members were put in place to hold this
Speaker 2: bitch up.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's no doubt about that. And and I think
Speaker 1: that were kinda gonna kind of be like in the
Speaker 1: dark until we find out what is actually in there,
Speaker 1: you know. I mean, and you were talking about how
Speaker 1: Rob Low and his family or whatever went there. Were
Speaker 1: they and without jumping too far ahead, was he able
Speaker 1: to go in there? Or was this done with the machine?
Speaker 2: It was done with a machine. They didn't physically go down,
Speaker 2: but they have cameras on the device itself. And yes,
Speaker 2: it's very possible that the issues they faced were done
Speaker 2: for dramatic.
Speaker 3: Flight of making good television. It's very possible.
Speaker 2: But it's not like he's the first person to try
Speaker 2: to make that happen and have issues arise and not
Speaker 2: be able to get any real definite answers. The fact is,
Speaker 2: no one has been able to get definite answers on this,
Speaker 2: and there has been multiple expirations that have been launched
Speaker 2: on this.
Speaker 3: So it's that's the thing.
Speaker 2: It's still very much open to conjecture. And that's why
Speaker 2: I'm saying, could it be orbs, could it be government,
Speaker 2: could it be aliens? There is no dog in any
Speaker 2: fight on this when and all of them equally hold
Speaker 2: credence at this time.
Speaker 1: I mean, you can't cancel any of them out. That's
Speaker 1: the thing.
Speaker 2: You cannot. And the guy who's also saying it doesn't
Speaker 2: it looks totally man made, or it doesn't look man made,
Speaker 2: it's totally naturally formed.
Speaker 3: In all that this guy.
Speaker 2: West, and yet West acknowledges unidentified flying objects. He goes
Speaker 2: on to say, quote, I'm convinced that UFOs are a reality.
Speaker 2: There's too much evidence out there beyond that, we don't
Speaker 2: know anything. We don't know who they are, why here,
Speaker 2: or how much of this stuff is our own government.
Speaker 2: A point beyond that is that anything that isn't explained
Speaker 2: or that can't be explained by current scientific methods, automatically
Speaker 2: it's aliens.
Speaker 3: It's the explanation of last resort. And I just don't
Speaker 3: buy that.
Speaker 2: So he's saying that, yes, he does believe in aliens,
Speaker 2: but he's not convinced that this is necessarily UFO connected,
Speaker 2: and again, could this be government connected? Could it be
Speaker 2: that they found this crazy underwater shelf and they decided, Yo,
Speaker 2: let's check out how structurally sounded is. Send the geological
Speaker 2: survey boys out there. He goes and sees that, no,
Speaker 2: this isn't moving, it's it's very secure. And then the
Speaker 2: US Government's like, all right, we got an in Home's
Speaker 2: submarine base that was built for US.
Speaker 3: Let's go boys.
Speaker 2: But at the same time, how has it been sending
Speaker 2: Ham radio signals for that long, for this many decades?
Speaker 3: There's too much open conjecture on it.
Speaker 1: Dog, I mean, look why Area fifty one is blurred
Speaker 1: out too interestingly enough? I mean there's there's not just
Speaker 1: al or seemingly alien base that are blurred out on
Speaker 1: Google Maps. There's a lot of shit that's blurred out
Speaker 1: on Google Maps. Nobody really necessarily understands why. I mean,
Speaker 1: the area fifty one, you kind of understand why a
Speaker 1: military base.
Speaker 2: I get why that would be blurred out on Google Maps.
Speaker 2: Most military bases should be blurred out on these maps.
Speaker 2: We don't want the bad guys using satellite imagery to
Speaker 2: do damage.
Speaker 3: Sure, yeah, but if this is just a naturally forming anomaly.
Speaker 2: Why is it blurred out?
Speaker 3: Bro's that doesn't check out to me personally.
Speaker 1: No, it doesn't. It almost gives me like Aquaman vibes.
Speaker 3: Ah ah, maybe, sir.
Speaker 2: Also weighing in on the malibi mystery is former FBI
Speaker 2: special agent Ben Hanson, who has an extensive background investigating
Speaker 2: and analyzing questionable pictures and videos. Hanson supplied huff Post
Speaker 2: with the following Google Earth image of the underwater object
Speaker 2: in question. This image was given to them by an
Speaker 2: FBI or former FBI special agent.
Speaker 3: Now that's pretty fascinating, he says.
Speaker 2: This was taken from a different angle of the quote
Speaker 2: unquote mysterious base hints and sold health posts and an email.
Speaker 2: The dark areas that people are saying look like the
Speaker 2: inside of a base really starts to look like just
Speaker 2: look just like shading of indentations of the shelf, and
Speaker 2: the pillars are now represented as jagged ridges. I don't
Speaker 2: see that as jagged at all. Those look kind of smooth,
Speaker 2: and you could see clear cut corners on them.
Speaker 1: Still look very uniform and very even and very level,
Speaker 1: and still looks like they're holding put there right. They dude,
Speaker 1: this is it's too perfect to be an anomaly.
Speaker 3: But they're not evenly spaced apart. No no, no, no,
Speaker 3: miss me with the bullshit.
Speaker 1: But even the center, the center gap is wide enough,
Speaker 1: like who cares about what the other pillars are, there's
Speaker 1: still a center gap there that that's probably the main
Speaker 1: entrance anyway, Like if you're driving a vehicle in there.
Speaker 2: That opening is like three quarters of a mile wide, right,
Speaker 2: you don't want to talk about what kind of structures
Speaker 2: or crafts could fit in and out of there?
Speaker 1: Come on, now, what an awesome picture though? And almost dude,
Speaker 1: doesn't it kind of resemble a little bit like like
Speaker 1: the super Dome down in New Orleans A little bit?
Speaker 2: Doesn't it?
Speaker 3: A little bit?
Speaker 2: It looks kind of like that sports arena look to
Speaker 2: it and all that, But it's not like a dome shape.
Speaker 2: It's actually flat on the surface side, and you can
Speaker 2: see where the sand and sediment have kind of uh
Speaker 2: collected on the top where there's like that little ridge
Speaker 2: line and all of that. But even still, if it
Speaker 2: was a naturally forming thing, there would be some sort
Speaker 2: of ridge lines on the top, there'd be some sort
Speaker 2: of wavering on the top it wouldn't be this smooth. Bro,
Speaker 2: look at all of the rest of the ocean floor.
Speaker 2: Nothing about any of this is smooth right here, completely
Speaker 2: smooth and normal.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but it's totally natural.
Speaker 2: Don't worry about that.
Speaker 3: Nothing to see here, bro, you got your fucking mind.
Speaker 1: I just find it weird that nobody. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: not off limits for anybody to go and check. It
Speaker 1: is directly off the coast. I was wanting to see
Speaker 1: exactly how far off the coast it is just visually
Speaker 1: on Google Maps, like moving around, dude, it's right off
Speaker 1: the coast and are and like, why are there no pictures? Like,
Speaker 1: surely somebody has pictures of whatever the fuck this is
Speaker 1: like their own pictures, not just Google Earth, you know.
Speaker 2: But like from sea level, if you're on if you're
Speaker 2: in a boat on the water, you can't really get
Speaker 2: a good look at it because of the perspective. You
Speaker 2: have to go above, you have to have an eagle
Speaker 2: eye view, you have to have satellite imagery to really
Speaker 2: take in what it is. It's you know what I mean,
Speaker 2: It's like, uh, if you were on the water, keep
Speaker 2: in minds two thousand feet lower than the surface. It's
Speaker 2: not like you're pulling up and you can clearly see
Speaker 2: a sandbar that you're about to hit. It's a good
Speaker 2: ways down. Like ships can can sail on top of
Speaker 2: this and never realize that they're on top of this,
Speaker 2: you know what I mean?
Speaker 8: Mmm?
Speaker 1: Okay, I mean yeah, it's still pretty damn big, dude.
Speaker 2: Like a mile is five two hundred and eighty feet.
Speaker 2: This is almost half a mile below this surface of
Speaker 2: the water.
Speaker 12: You got.
Speaker 2: You gotta have a different vantage point to be able
Speaker 2: to really take it in.
Speaker 1: Your ears are going and pop a little bit down
Speaker 1: there too.
Speaker 2: Oh my god.
Speaker 3: Yeah, all right, so that he says, taken from a
Speaker 3: different angle. Quote.
Speaker 2: Google obtains their underwater data from several different sources, including
Speaker 2: satellite radar and ECHOSNAR from the Navy, in OAA, NASA,
Speaker 2: and other agencies. Because they often use very different technologies,
Speaker 2: the derived information isn't always going to agree. When it doesn't,
Speaker 2: Google relies on its automatic three D auto generation programs
Speaker 2: to make sense of it. I'm gonna I'm gonna read
Speaker 2: that one again because that didn't make any sense to me.
Speaker 2: They use radar and ECHOSNAR from the US Navy, the
Speaker 2: n O double A, and NASA as well as other agencies,
Speaker 2: because they often use very different technologies, the derived information
Speaker 2: isn't always going to agree.
Speaker 3: That doesn't make sense to me.
Speaker 2: If there was a structure under the water, it doesn't
Speaker 2: matter if you're picking it up from echo, sonar, from radar,
Speaker 2: from satellite imagery. If something's really there, all of the
Speaker 2: information should agree.
Speaker 3: Yeah, there might be a.
Speaker 2: Little bit of some tolerance differences, like this radar might
Speaker 2: be eighty percent accurate, while this sonar might be ninety
Speaker 2: five percent accurate, So maybe some would be a little
Speaker 2: cleaner and a little crisper than others.
Speaker 3: But they shouldn't disagree with each other at all.
Speaker 2: So right off the rip, we have multiple different government
Speaker 2: agencies disagreeing on what they're finding with this thing that
Speaker 2: we can clearly tell her there.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I don't buy that, not even a little bit, dude,
Speaker 3: he says.
Speaker 2: We are dealing with limited information to render the graphic
Speaker 2: because we can't see it. We can't see it evidenced
Speaker 2: in the disparity of image quality between the anomaly and
Speaker 2: the areas immediately surrounding it. Hanson said the blurry section
Speaker 2: in jagget Edges obviously suggests a patchwork of image processing
Speaker 2: that has taken place. In the end, we are left
Speaker 2: with a variety of theories to explain the Malibu anomaly
Speaker 2: aka Sycamore Nole. Will the UFO alien underwater based proponents
Speaker 2: be eventually proven right, leaving geologists and the deep Blue
Speaker 2: dusts scratching their heads and wondering how they got it wrong.
Speaker 2: Wes conceives the possibility of this object could be the
Speaker 2: entrance of sorts in the same way that action of
Speaker 2: moving water can form caves below the surface. Okay, and
Speaker 2: I can even understand that a little bit, But dude,
Speaker 2: forming an underwater cave is not a clean ordeal. There's
Speaker 2: not pillars that are made from that. It's more like
Speaker 2: the hollowing out, you know what I'm saying. It's a
Speaker 2: it's an erosion thing. You don't leave specific pillars along
Speaker 2: that are holding up this completely level surface. That's preposterous,
Speaker 2: he says in quotes. There is no big mystery to
Speaker 2: this thing two thousand feet under the sea. In terms
Speaker 2: of it being an interests entrance, Wes said, of course,
Speaker 2: until you get a camera there, you don't know where
Speaker 2: the entrance is leading. I'd hazard a guess that it
Speaker 2: doesn't go in too far, and if they do get
Speaker 2: in there, I think the chances are they're not going
Speaker 2: to find any lost treasures of Atlantis.
Speaker 3: Okay, well, there you go.
Speaker 2: So this is the huff Post article that was being referenced,
Speaker 2: and it brought up some other very interesting prospects to this. Now,
Speaker 2: before we clary, this Rob low quick clip of his episode.
Speaker 1: What are your thoughts, Jonathan, I think that there's I
Speaker 1: don't think there's any way that this is anomaly.
Speaker 2: You think about seven you mean naturally made?
Speaker 10: I don't.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't think that it's a natural thing. I
Speaker 1: think that you know, over the course of time, people
Speaker 1: like settlers have always settled along along the coast, Right, Like,
Speaker 1: if this structure was fifty miles out into the ocean,
Speaker 1: twenty miles out into the ocean, you might think, Okay,
Speaker 1: maybe maybe there's a chance that this is just coincidentally
Speaker 1: matched up and lined up here. But seeing that people
Speaker 1: all through the course of history, people who were smart,
Speaker 1: people who knew that they needed water to survive, they
Speaker 1: always settled along the coast, and that and California's.
Speaker 2: Lines, Dude, civilization has always gone around rivers and coastlines.
Speaker 2: Water provides food, it provides travel, It provides many many things,
Speaker 2: one hundred percent with.
Speaker 4: You, right.
Speaker 1: So it's just it makes sense to me that this
Speaker 1: could be and probably is, some kind of man made structure.
Speaker 1: Now I don't even know if I just want to
Speaker 1: limit it to being man made, because my question.
Speaker 3: Would be possible, though it's possible.
Speaker 1: My question is, though, is that if it is alien,
Speaker 1: why do they need the coast?
Speaker 4: You know what I mean?
Speaker 2: Well, let me throw out a couple of potentials for you,
Speaker 2: and again I have no more weight in one versus
Speaker 2: the other. If this is a alien craft that, let's say,
Speaker 2: did crash very roswell style, and it landed on the coastline,
Speaker 2: and the ancient peoples took that and built things around
Speaker 2: it to hold it in the position it is, and
Speaker 2: then the waters rose up and now it's under the ocean.
Speaker 2: That's an option. Is it also possible that the aliens
Speaker 2: use this as a launching platform and they don't necessarily
Speaker 2: need the coast, But they're also here observing humans, so
Speaker 2: why wouldn't they want it a little closer For pragmatic reasons,
Speaker 2: I could see that too. La is a massive civilization hub.
Speaker 2: Tons of people live there, and it's not like that's
Speaker 2: a new thing only from the past few decades. Ever,
Speaker 2: since the California Gold Rush took off, La became a
Speaker 2: central hub. So there's maybe in this allegedly has been
Speaker 2: there long before Los Angeles was ever a colony or
Speaker 2: a little village. This has been there for millennias.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you if you had the ability of
Speaker 1: an alien to travel at light speed, to go to
Speaker 1: any point in history, if that's something that they could do,
Speaker 1: you know, and you're somebody that you know, maybe you
Speaker 1: maybe you as an alien, maybe you used to be
Speaker 1: human and maybe you like evolved into whatever this alien
Speaker 1: creature is, which is what some people say that that's
Speaker 1: what the gray aliens are. Anyway, if you were that,
Speaker 1: at what point in history would you be most interested
Speaker 1: in observing? You know, would it be something futuristic, would
Speaker 1: it be something far in the past, would it be
Speaker 1: you know what I mean? Like, if you could pick
Speaker 1: a time to observe, like just to observe humanity, not
Speaker 1: any one specific event, but just to observe humanity, which
Speaker 1: point in time would you want to observe.
Speaker 2: Personally? Just off of my own biases, I would go
Speaker 2: ancient Greece, ancient Egypt, ancient Rome. I would go and
Speaker 2: check out the ancient Nordic tribes. I would go see
Speaker 2: the ancient civilization of Mali, the Aztext, the Mayans, the Incas, like,
Speaker 2: There's so many cultures that I would want to go
Speaker 2: and see with my own eyes. But at the same time,
Speaker 2: are the extraterrestrial entities Are they traveling this just to
Speaker 2: see it because they're curious or are they being set
Speaker 2: to task?
Speaker 14: Right?
Speaker 2: Are they being sent on a mission to go and
Speaker 2: observe certain things for a certain purpose and they have
Speaker 2: to report back to something or somebody with this.
Speaker 3: Are they going back to aid in humans in these
Speaker 3: ways like that? That's what I'm saying. There's so many
Speaker 3: possibilities and no clear cut answers.
Speaker 1: On it, no way of knowing that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, So all right, This is a quick clip,
Speaker 2: it's only three and a half minutes long, of the
Speaker 2: Rob Low and his son's investigation show that they were doing,
Speaker 2: which was actually pretty cool.
Speaker 3: Let's check it out. The loafive Google.
Speaker 13: Earth finishes mapping the ocean floor of Los Angeles. There
Speaker 13: is an underwater anomaly at about two thousand feet right
Speaker 13: off of Point Doome, where I grew up. And the
Speaker 13: theories are everything from underwater ancient alien base, which would
Speaker 13: explain why the lights were seen coming out of that area.
Speaker 2: They even acknowledge that they are seeing lights in and
Speaker 2: around the Malibu and LA area. This show was five
Speaker 2: years ago. Throwing it out, let's listen more. But I'm
Speaker 2: just saying, it's not like this is a new thing
Speaker 2: that just came about because of the fires. If anything,
Speaker 2: the fact that I decided to do some research into
Speaker 2: Sycamore Nole around the time that the La fires are happening,
Speaker 2: that was a happy coincidence.
Speaker 3: Good cult members, But you know.
Speaker 2: We don't really believe in those On this show, I
Speaker 2: think everything kind of happens for a reason, does it not?
Speaker 14: It? Do it?
Speaker 5: Do?
Speaker 13: All?
Speaker 3: Right, let's go.
Speaker 4: I'm as Tim Weller. I'm an expedition leader.
Speaker 16: I was a part of Air France for seven search
Speaker 16: Malaysian Air three seventy and to the Titanic a couple
Speaker 16: of times. The deep side of the anomaly is two
Speaker 16: thousand feet and we want to get the right data.
Speaker 13: So I'm going to work with the ROV, the robot
Speaker 13: camera device exactly.
Speaker 16: Primarily the ROV is an eyeball three cameras. You have
Speaker 16: an HD camera, color camera and a low light black
Speaker 16: and white camera at the murder.
Speaker 4: All right, guys, we're going down.
Speaker 14: There. It is.
Speaker 4: It's in amazing bridge r OV.
Speaker 16: We are ninety feet so it gets to a position one.
Speaker 4: North of one.
Speaker 16: Okay, Roger, that do me a favorite. Turn on light
Speaker 16: two on the TMS. We are one hundred and fifteen feet.
Speaker 13: We're approaching the deepest I've ever been down scuba diving.
Speaker 4: And that that's the.
Speaker 2: Color it gets, that amazing dark purple.
Speaker 4: That's it.
Speaker 11: That's my We're already passed it.
Speaker 16: We're at three hundred ninety feet on our way down
Speaker 16: to six hundred. We're gonna get her out of the cage.
Speaker 16: It's ready to do this.
Speaker 4: It released the Beast Cool release the Beast bridge jr OV. Yeah,
Speaker 4: go ahead and open it up for Roger. That all right, Okay,
Speaker 4: we're out of the box. There he goes. That's awesome.
Speaker 4: All right, guys.
Speaker 16: The plan is right now to get the r V
Speaker 16: set up at the top of the plateau, do a
Speaker 16: little survey of the area.
Speaker 4: We're pretty close with your depth. Where am I stare?
Speaker 4: Roger that.
Speaker 16: Top of the plateau.
Speaker 12: Oh, here we go.
Speaker 13: We are on the ground top of the anomaly.
Speaker 2: So they're currently one tired. The plateau pretty tough to control.
Speaker 4: I can't stay ahead of the cage. He's just telling us,
Speaker 4: you're gonna have that to get to the ship to
Speaker 4: the town.
Speaker 2: Hold on, I'm trying to find my teather back out
Speaker 2: of them is pulling.
Speaker 4: I'm the wall here.
Speaker 2: Look at that thing drops right down.
Speaker 15: Friget sminterferards with our cameras.
Speaker 14: What's causing that?
Speaker 7: I have no idea?
Speaker 4: Whoa look at that? Did you see we lost the vehicle?
Speaker 3: They lost the vehicle.
Speaker 1: That's a expensive mistake, it is.
Speaker 2: But you know it's Rob Low and it's the Crime
Speaker 2: Investigation Channel, So I mean, what exactly his money? But yeah,
Speaker 2: so let's go a little bit more in terms of
Speaker 2: this here and this is on A and E an
Speaker 2: underwater alien base off of Malibu. And this is off
Speaker 2: of the lowation off of Rob Low. I thought it
Speaker 2: was a punny word plan.
Speaker 3: But uh, here we go.
Speaker 2: Location about six miles off the coast of Malibu's Point
Speaker 2: Doom in California. Backstory for decades, reports of UFOs and
Speaker 2: us OS sightings along Malibu coasts have been fairly common.
Speaker 2: Rumors of an alien base or portal in this area
Speaker 2: are nothing new, but in recent years there have come
Speaker 2: to the four within the UFO research community. The attention
Speaker 2: specifically to this location a largely due to reports of
Speaker 2: a stadium shaped structure about two thousand feet underwater, widely
Speaker 2: known as Sycamore Nole. Some refer to it as an anomaly,
Speaker 2: while others believe it's an alien base. It's believed to
Speaker 2: be between two and a half to three miles wide.
Speaker 2: In twenty fourteen, radio personality Jimmy Captain of Conspiracy Church
Speaker 2: brought it up the matter on Fated Black Podcasts. We've
Speaker 2: already talked about these things, referring to it as a
Speaker 2: perhaps another Area fifty one or something not yet considered.
Speaker 2: He said it was potentially the biggest breaking story of
Speaker 2: UFO of ufology since Area fifty one, But not everyone
Speaker 2: in the UFO research community was convinced. Robert Stanley, a
Speaker 2: UFO researcher and editor of the Unicus Magazine of self
Speaker 2: described magazine for earth Bound extraterrestrials, reports having noticed this
Speaker 2: mysterious spot via Google Earth serve several years prior to
Speaker 2: Church's announcement, but says he didn't report it publicly as
Speaker 2: it was he was unable to substantiate its authenticity. Stanley
Speaker 2: says he doesn't know what the anomaly is, but he
Speaker 2: does offer a few thoughts. It feels like a red herring.
Speaker 2: He says, this is some sort of weird distraction. It
Speaker 2: may be because Point in Mugu, which is nearby, is
Speaker 2: very large, powerful navy base, and they don't want people
Speaker 2: to think in terms of it being a secret military base. Okay,
Speaker 2: so they're already saying there is a massive base nearby,
Speaker 2: and they don't want to cause more speculation and more
Speaker 2: eyes in this area because it could lead to some
Speaker 2: slacking and defensive posture of another military base nearby. Again,
Speaker 2: it doesn't really hold water to me. It sounds like
Speaker 2: people are trying to put more gasoline into the official
Speaker 2: narrative machine.
Speaker 1: But well, typically you see the UFOs and shit like
Speaker 1: that around military bases though, So indeed, I see why
Speaker 1: they're trying to draw the connection there.
Speaker 2: I could see you. Preston Dinnett, another UFO re searcher
Speaker 2: and author of more than twenty books on paranormal and
Speaker 2: supernatural phenomena.
Speaker 3: Is less skeptical.
Speaker 2: He he's believed in alien based theory for years. I
Speaker 2: was convinced there was something there before this Malibian nominally
Speaker 2: was publicized. He says, again, this is another Google image
Speaker 2: of it. Bro this is and you can see this
Speaker 2: clearly defined line. That's what I'm saying. If this was
Speaker 2: a thing that slid off, we wouldn't be able to
Speaker 2: see the ridge on this side, right. It would be
Speaker 2: kind of canted in one direction, especially if it was
Speaker 2: this big of a drop off underneath it. So you're
Speaker 2: telling me the plates and the earth shift, it just
Speaker 2: kind of perfectly stopped right here, leaving off this crazy cliff.
Speaker 2: That's that's crazy to me. Here we go paranormal activity.
Speaker 2: Opinions are mixed on what the anomaly could be. Is
Speaker 2: it an alien base, is it a government created distraction,
Speaker 2: or is it just the shape of an underwater terrain
Speaker 2: in the depths of the Pacific Stantley's excuse me? Stanley
Speaker 2: stands firm on his nope, it's an alien based stance.
Speaker 2: He says, quote, a lot of people are under the
Speaker 2: false impression that there's a UFO there. He said, Now
Speaker 2: that doesn't mean that there aren't UFOs there. I've seen
Speaker 2: them myself on many occasions. But just because UFOs are
Speaker 2: seen there, that doesn't mean that that is a UFO
Speaker 2: base under the water. And here's his reasoning quote, UFOs
Speaker 2: are coming in and out of portals, stargates, or wormholes.
Speaker 2: They don't need massive bases under the water or under
Speaker 2: the ground. I'm not saying there aren't any, but they
Speaker 2: don't need them because they can just pop in and
Speaker 2: out of our skies anytime they want, anywhere they want,
Speaker 2: as far as I can sell. Dinnet approaches the topic
Speaker 2: from the other side, saying, quote, I've collected probably fifty
Speaker 2: to one hundred reports of people who have seen UFOs
Speaker 2: going in and out of the water there.
Speaker 3: In quote still, he expresses some doubt.
Speaker 2: My problem is that the Google images are coming out
Speaker 2: of different are coming out different depending on what viewpoint
Speaker 2: you're looking at this thing from. Some show a tunnel,
Speaker 2: some don't. While he acknowledges he hasn't gone down and
Speaker 2: explored the structure himself, Dinner remains optimistic about it being
Speaker 2: something extraterrestrial. Quote, I am very intrigued by the possibility,
Speaker 2: and I'm convinced there's something down there.
Speaker 3: Okay.
Speaker 2: Now, Dinnett has a nineteen ninety nine book on UFOs.
Speaker 2: His book UFOs Over to Panga Canyon, and it addresses
Speaker 2: accounts of UFO sightings from the Malibu area in general,
Speaker 2: and he presents presented the possibility of the underwater anomaly
Speaker 2: being a bas as far back as two thousand and
Speaker 2: six when Fate magazine published his article the articles named
Speaker 2: is there an underwater UFO base off the southern coast
Speaker 2: of California, where he cited several witnesses, accounts, and opinions.
Speaker 2: In several articles for Unicus, including who discovered the so
Speaker 2: called Malibu UFO Base? And Digital Deception in the Pacific,
Speaker 2: there is no UFO base off the coast of Malibu.
Speaker 2: Stanley has made his position clear as well. See if
Speaker 2: yourself look at Google Earth and just quota all these things.
Speaker 2: All right, So you actually had that pulled up currently correct?
Speaker 1: Yeah, And I just want to make mention on that.
Speaker 1: You know, the people that are saying it's absolutely not
Speaker 1: a UFO base, that's just as ridiculous to say that
Speaker 1: it absolutely is a UFO base. So yep, that's the
Speaker 1: way I look at it, Like have you gone there,
Speaker 1: You're you're you're determining it just from these Google images, Like,
Speaker 1: we need more, we need more evidence, Like people need
Speaker 1: to go down there. I mean, I guess it's kind
Speaker 1: of a deep dive, but I don't know how far
Speaker 1: can somebody dive without like dying, cause I think that
Speaker 1: there is like a point that you can't dive too
Speaker 1: deep because of your your ears and shit like that, Right.
Speaker 2: So unless you have like very specialized equipment, like I'm
Speaker 2: talking to some of those old school diver helmets and shit,
Speaker 2: because at that point's the pressure right right, just your
Speaker 2: ears popping, like your body, your skeletal structure can only
Speaker 2: maintain so much outside force. So I want to say,
Speaker 2: around like two hundred feet two hundred and fifty feet
Speaker 2: is when it starts to get like you have to
Speaker 2: have some cree pretty deep credentials and diving certifications to
Speaker 2: even attempt something like that. There's nobody free diving down
Speaker 2: two thousand feet.
Speaker 1: Have you ever seen have you ever seen that movie
Speaker 1: called The Meg with Jason Statham, but the Meglaedon movie?
Speaker 2: Oh no, I haven't.
Speaker 1: I heard about it though, dude, really good.
Speaker 2: I love it.
Speaker 1: They just came out another one too, but that's what
Speaker 1: he does. He's like a super deep underwater diver and
Speaker 1: shit like that. And they're trying to find like, you know,
Speaker 1: old walls that you know, the meglaedons could be like
Speaker 1: holed up in and they were going pretty damn ded
Speaker 1: down there too. So it just makes me wonder, like,
Speaker 1: how how deep can you go? But I guess we can.
Speaker 1: We can search that here in a moment. But yeah,
Speaker 1: let's pull up the Google images or the Google Earth
Speaker 1: video not video, but you know what I mean. So
Speaker 1: here it is, Yeah, this is that same coastway and
Speaker 1: blurred out right here.
Speaker 2: Yep. You can tell her there's something there that is
Speaker 2: being blurred out. But that wasn't the case ten years ago.
Speaker 1: Bro oh yeah, even says twenty twenty five.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and all around it, you see all those other
Speaker 2: ridge lines to the left, you see the ridge, you
Speaker 2: see the waves. You see over there this rock on
Speaker 2: the fall on the bottom right. They're like, Okay, why
Speaker 2: isn't that its own structure, because that's not parallel to
Speaker 2: the surface of the water, right, that's not a level
Speaker 2: structure where you can see all sides. And you can
Speaker 2: see what I mean as far as like islands go.
Speaker 2: You can see how it kind of goes down and
Speaker 2: down and down leading to a peak of the structure.
Speaker 2: This in the object in question of sycamore nole doesn't
Speaker 2: have some sort of structure that leads up to it.
Speaker 3: It's just out there on its.
Speaker 1: Own, right Yeah, it's I mean, dude, there's nothing there,
Speaker 1: you know, outside of it just being right there on
Speaker 1: the coast. Now you can see that there is some
Speaker 1: kind of drop off going on right here. Sure, sure,
Speaker 1: you know, maybe it's just sentiment or over time or whatever,
Speaker 1: there's some kind of drop off. But these are very
Speaker 1: like the lines that you see in right here, very
Speaker 1: distinguishable compared to the lines that you see that we're
Speaker 1: guessing are pillar like structures, you know, so.
Speaker 2: Not those pillars are not because of natural erosion. That's
Speaker 2: that's well, no, dude. And they have defined corners like
Speaker 2: this looks like cut stone. What are you talking about?
Speaker 1: It? Isn't it also amazing that, you know, if it
Speaker 1: is some kind of cave or some kind of you know,
Speaker 1: thing that you can go in. I feel like it's
Speaker 1: kind of amazing that it wouldn't be filled up with
Speaker 1: sentiment or sentiment or whatever by by this time, or
Speaker 1: I don't know how deep you can even go in there.
Speaker 1: I don't I don't know how water works and like
Speaker 1: ancient things with you know, like if if this structure
Speaker 1: is one hundred thousand years old or five thousand, or
Speaker 1: even one thousand or five hundred whatever, like, it's just
Speaker 1: interesting to see that it's been able to hold up
Speaker 1: for that long.
Speaker 3: However, point Jonathan, we only see the opening that entrance currently.
Speaker 2: We don't even know how deep that goes because of
Speaker 2: the sediment that has formed at the base of it.
Speaker 2: Is it possible that those pillars go down another five
Speaker 2: hundred feet and that this isn't just a little opening,
Speaker 2: it's actually a massive opening that has been kind of
Speaker 2: brushed in by sand and sediment that have washed in
Speaker 2: over the years. But to your point, that would have
Speaker 2: been filled in by now if nothing was going in
Speaker 2: and out of it, keeping the entrance open.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: What's interesting is is that it seems like like this
Speaker 1: whole shit along the coast, Like you see, it's not
Speaker 1: just blurred right here, It goes all the way down
Speaker 1: the coast. It seems like right like you can see
Speaker 1: where the blurry starts, right, Yeah, and like if I scroll, well, yeah,
Speaker 1: you're seems like this is where the blurring stops. Everything
Speaker 1: else down here seems like it's not blurred out anymore
Speaker 1: and it's more defined, but the blurriness seems like, why
Speaker 1: is that so clear? And this is so right? And
Speaker 1: it goes all the way almost as if there's some
Speaker 1: kind of I don't know, some kind of track system
Speaker 1: that's going on here too.
Speaker 2: Possibly possibly, And of course we'll never know now because
Speaker 2: it's all blurred out and it will probably never be unblurred. Now.
Speaker 2: All of that to say, this going on around the
Speaker 2: times of the La fires. I'm not saying the two
Speaker 2: are exclusively connected by any means, but it's very interesting
Speaker 2: that they are doing this, that they are blurring this
Speaker 2: out to take away from the drone slash ORB sightings
Speaker 2: and all that is involved with this, especially now, Bro.
Speaker 3: I again, we don't believe in coincidences here.
Speaker 1: I mean, so after your boy Rob Low, I like
Speaker 1: to call him Soda Pop because The Outsiders is one
Speaker 1: of my favorite movies of all time.
Speaker 3: Soda Pop Curtis dude, Yeah, dude, but.
Speaker 1: I mean, did he come to you know, some whatever story?
Speaker 1: Like after all the exploration and everything, like, did he
Speaker 1: finally say, oh, this is what I think it is
Speaker 1: after all of that.
Speaker 2: No, pretty much left it open to interpretation and speculation.
Speaker 2: And that's what I'm saying. Some of that may have
Speaker 2: been done for dramatic flair of making quote unquote good TV.
Speaker 2: I get it, But the fact is that they actually
Speaker 2: were not able to get any real good video evidence
Speaker 2: of it, either because something cut the tether to the
Speaker 2: to the cameras in the middle of their exploration. Again,
Speaker 2: I'm sure there was just some natural rock that cut
Speaker 2: that tether totally how that goes, or to be.
Speaker 1: Able to build on the lore that could have just
Speaker 1: been something that you know, they added into it, like
Speaker 1: well maybe because this is how I feel. I'm I'm
Speaker 1: quite positive that the majority of the TV shows that
Speaker 1: are on TV are somewhat government funded, Like at least
Speaker 1: some of the channels are. I don't know about you know,
Speaker 1: which individual shows are, but we know that some of
Speaker 1: the channels definitely are. And we know that, you know,
Speaker 1: the government has infiltrated its ways into certain like FBI
Speaker 1: TV shows and you know, shit like that. So could
Speaker 1: it be their way of saying, oh, well, you don't
Speaker 1: want to go down there. You saw what happened to
Speaker 1: that rover like, and let's blur it out and let's
Speaker 1: try and make it seem as ominous and scary as possible,
Speaker 1: because if you go down there, you never know what's
Speaker 1: gonna happen. Kind of shit, I don't know, very true.
Speaker 1: Just speculating.
Speaker 3: That's all there can be about this is speculation, that's
Speaker 3: the thing.
Speaker 2: And no theory is more or less credible than the
Speaker 2: other because there's no concrete information on it. Even the
Speaker 2: US Geological Survey guy, everything he said can easily be
Speaker 2: dismissed as bullshit just off of looking at the images ourselves.
Speaker 2: So that's why I'm saying there's so much open to
Speaker 2: interpretation here. I got another article pulled up here of
Speaker 2: you from inside the bottle mofon asks, is there an
Speaker 2: undersea base off the California coast? Is from July of
Speaker 2: twenty fourteen. As a matter of fact, I'm gonna go
Speaker 2: down a little bit here. It says on June fourteenth
Speaker 2: of nineteen ninety two. June fourteenth, nineteen ninety two, numerous
Speaker 2: witnesses observed hundreds of strange craft in the Santa Monica
Speaker 2: Mountains of southern California. This marked the beginning of an
Speaker 2: ongoing massive wave of involving the entire range of UFO phenomenon,
Speaker 2: from sightings to abductions, and most importantly here usos, the
Speaker 2: unidentified submersible objects. After writing an article on the subject
Speaker 2: for Fate Magazine and appearing on the History Channel's Deep cufos,
Speaker 2: then it received a flood of emails, calls, and letters
Speaker 2: from new witnesses detailing many dramatic USO cases that have
Speaker 2: never been since revealed the Southern California coast. Then it
Speaker 2: discovered as one of the world's leading producers of undersea
Speaker 2: USO activities. After years of researching the activity and interviewing
Speaker 2: hundreds of witnesses, then it has come to the startling
Speaker 2: conclusion that there is an undersea UFO base in the
Speaker 2: Santa Santa Catalina Channel. In this exciting presentation, he will
Speaker 2: reveal the incredible results of the investigation, including first hand
Speaker 2: cases of undersea UFO activity in Southern California, around the
Speaker 2: world and around the world excuse me, evidence of government
Speaker 2: surveillance and cover ups, photographs of UFOs, and artwork based
Speaker 2: on eyewitnesses account and behind the scenes. Look at his
Speaker 2: involvement with the history channels, Deep c UFO one two
Speaker 2: and UFO Hunters and much more so.
Speaker 3: This is a this is an article. I'm sorry, this
Speaker 3: is a huh.
Speaker 2: That's all there is.
Speaker 3: When I pulled it up another link to go somewhere else.
Speaker 1: It's a it's a blog spot kind of situation there.
Speaker 1: But you know, I I don't know how I feel
Speaker 1: about MOFON to be real with you, which is called
Speaker 1: the Mutual UFO Network. We actually tried to get in
Speaker 1: touch with them, remember a couple of years ago, to
Speaker 1: try and see if we can get the Louisiana representative
Speaker 1: on the show. And then whenever the Louisiana Yeah, the
Speaker 1: Louisiana representative didn't answer. So we reached out to like
Speaker 1: all of them that are in the South, like Texas
Speaker 1: in Georgia and Florida and Mississippi and Alabama and all
Speaker 1: that shit, right, And I think was it the Louisiana
Speaker 1: one that yeah, I think it was the Louisiana one
Speaker 1: was the only one that wrote back and said, I
Speaker 1: just have too much shit going on right now. I
Speaker 1: don't have time to be going on no podcast it's like,
Speaker 1: I mean, why you don't have one hour, like one hour,
Speaker 1: like you're that busy dealing with UFOs and you don't
Speaker 1: want to talk about it to the rest of the world.
Speaker 1: You want to keep it within your little network there.
Speaker 1: Get fucked. That's how I feel about it. And Chris Bloodsoe,
Speaker 1: you know, of the of the Bledsoe family, he also
Speaker 1: has the same kind of feeling towards the Towards Moufon,
Speaker 1: they basically tried to drag his name through the fucking
Speaker 1: mud over there, saying that, oh, he's just imagining these
Speaker 1: things and these aren't real and stuff like that, because
Speaker 1: the way that the move, the way that Moufon looks
Speaker 1: at UFOs, they don't buy the orbs like that's not
Speaker 1: that's not like in their dealings, they're more scientific. They
Speaker 1: want to know about the nuts and bolts and the
Speaker 1: physical craft kind of shit and not these plasmoid looking
Speaker 1: whatever the hell is going on with orbs, right, And
Speaker 1: so you know, Bledsoe was reaching out to them a
Speaker 1: long time ago and then they came out and they
Speaker 1: were like, eh, you know, not our shit. And you know,
Speaker 1: they they were just real skeptical. They made him look bad,
Speaker 1: and so I kind of share that sentiment towards Moufon
Speaker 1: as well.
Speaker 2: And I'm not even saying that the orbs and the
Speaker 2: UFOs are connected, but I think they are more likely
Speaker 2: connected than not.
Speaker 3: Just throwing it out, how can they not be?
Speaker 1: How could you not be interested in that? You know
Speaker 1: what I'm saying, Like, it just blows my mind when
Speaker 1: you know, like you know, this day and age aliens,
Speaker 1: it's it's become pretty well known that aliens are just
Speaker 1: being almost globally accepted or flat earthly accepted, however your
Speaker 1: term like that. And so you know, whenever you're seeing
Speaker 1: this shit up in the sky and it's changing colors
Speaker 1: and it's changing shape and it's going all these crazy
Speaker 1: speeds and all that kind of shit, and you don't
Speaker 1: want to group that in the UFO category, It's like, okay,
Speaker 1: then what do you group that in?
Speaker 3: Right now we're getting into oh, that's got to be
Speaker 3: an angel or it's.
Speaker 2: Got to be a demon.
Speaker 1: It's like, okay, now you're getting spiritual with it, which
Speaker 1: that's fine too. You know, I don't think that it
Speaker 1: would be terribly wrong to say that the orbs are
Speaker 1: angels or angelic or something like that. I mean, we
Speaker 1: don't really understand what an angel would look like because
Speaker 1: I mean the Bible, the way the Bible describes it,
Speaker 1: it's like it almost seems like kind of scary on
Speaker 1: some shit, right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, But then I've also looked more into those things too,
Speaker 2: the spinning eye thing and the seraphoam and all these
Speaker 2: those wouldn't necessarily be angels that would come into contact
Speaker 2: with humans unless it was like in a dream state,
Speaker 2: which a lot of those were seen in, right, Those
Speaker 2: would be more like the throne guards of God, which like,
Speaker 2: that's not the same angels that come down and say like,
Speaker 2: be not afraid this and this like the one that
Speaker 2: came and spoke to Mary wasn't the spinning fiery eye wheels.
Speaker 3: Like, there's levels to that shit.
Speaker 2: But a lot of that gets lost in translation, and
Speaker 2: people will take that one snippet of the description be
Speaker 2: like boom, that's a type of angel.
Speaker 3: It's like.
Speaker 2: Maybe, but not necessarily what you're calling an angel. But
Speaker 2: to the same to back on topic here, the orbs
Speaker 2: and the flying saucers, they may not be connected, but
Speaker 2: it sounds more plausible that they are, or at least
Speaker 2: that they have something to do with each other. To
Speaker 2: that point, as we were talking about Sycamore Nole, we're
Speaker 2: talking about these UFO sidings off the coast of California.
Speaker 2: Right here. This was two weeks ago when the fires
Speaker 2: were going down. This is a Santa Monica beach cam.
Speaker 2: And you tell me what we're looking at here, because
Speaker 2: I honestly can't call it.
Speaker 7: Brother, back to third phase the moon Blake cousins along
Speaker 7: with my brother Brandt. The wildfires Los Angeles unprecedented, but
Speaker 7: also the UFOs were spotted. Are you seeing one right now?
Speaker 7: The Santa Monica Beach campowered by the explorer dot Org
Speaker 7: captures some kind of anomaly during the event as it
Speaker 7: continues as we speak. But let's get some closer looks
Speaker 7: in just a moment. Buckle up, everybody. We've got a
Speaker 7: lot of UFOs for you tonight. Are you seeing what
Speaker 7: I'm seeing? It's kind of faint, it's off in the distance.
Speaker 7: Are you seeing what I'm seeing? It's from kind of faint,
Speaker 7: it's off in the distance. This bright plasmic orb dancing
Speaker 7: in the sky with smoke surrounding it. Does it look
Speaker 7: like any kind of drone that I'm aware of? What
Speaker 7: the heck is going on?
Speaker 2: Guys.
Speaker 7: Yeah, let's take a closer look at this again. We're
Speaker 7: seeing this kind of a plasmic ball with this trail
Speaker 7: being led behind it as it kind of dances, like
Speaker 7: you say, through the sky about one hundred and fifty
Speaker 7: feet to maybe fifty feet off the ground. It's doing
Speaker 7: these kind of incredible maneuvers. So let's roll it once
Speaker 7: again and get this close up as we see it
Speaker 7: pop into frame and it does this kind of like
Speaker 7: weird conventional move. This is not your typical drone. It stood.
Speaker 7: You try to pilot a tron like this, it's very difficult.
Speaker 7: And look at it just shoots straight down, make this
Speaker 7: direct bank and then kind of just coast along the
Speaker 7: street side over there and then kind of swiftly moves
Speaker 7: towards the ocean.
Speaker 1: Look at this.
Speaker 7: Yeah, I would say it started off but probably about
Speaker 7: one thousand feet up in the air. But look at
Speaker 7: this thing dance and its undulations and its speed and
Speaker 7: dynamics of flight pattern is very unusual. It's it's hard
Speaker 7: to tell exactly what it is, but it's really cool
Speaker 7: that somebody captured this via just watching this webcam and
Speaker 7: able to see this phenomenon. Look at this thing again.
Speaker 7: It traversed from the sky and it kind of went
Speaker 7: into the streets.
Speaker 2: Now, I haven't seen any of these orbs leave a
Speaker 2: trail behind them.
Speaker 3: That's kind of new.
Speaker 2: Same time, is it equally possible that maybe it flew
Speaker 2: into the fire and got damaged in some way, shape
Speaker 2: or form, and that's kind of why he's doing these
Speaker 2: crazy flying maneuvers and things.
Speaker 3: But at the same time, I don't think orbs can
Speaker 3: catch on fire. Maybe they can.
Speaker 2: There was a report of that one that was on
Speaker 2: fire and started catching the town on fire in Russia
Speaker 2: a couple decades back.
Speaker 3: So I mean, I don't know what to call that, Jonathan,
Speaker 3: I don't know what to make of that.
Speaker 1: Uh yeah, I don't either. I'm happy that, you know,
Speaker 1: people are starting to really see it all over the place.
Speaker 1: I would love to see some shit like that in person,
Speaker 1: like we've seen, you know, the orbs and stuff that
Speaker 1: electro Nick has kind of brought to the you know,
Speaker 1: whenever we're around Electronnick, they just seem to happen. But
Speaker 1: I feel like they're always a lot higher up than
Speaker 1: what that was. You know, that seems to be I
Speaker 1: don't want to say it's something different, but at least
Speaker 1: it's a lot closer to humanity at that point. And
Speaker 1: also whenever people like to just look at this shit
Speaker 1: and say, oh, that's ball lightning, like, don't spit on
Speaker 1: my face and tell me it's raining, Like I'm not
Speaker 1: an idiot. Whenever I look at that, like, that's not
Speaker 1: ball lightning.
Speaker 2: I could even understand ball lightning being a quote unquote
Speaker 2: natural phenomenon if the conditions were right.
Speaker 3: Ball lightning was not happening above the La Fires in.
Speaker 2: One of the biggest droughts that have ever happened, where
Speaker 2: there were no clouds or rain in the sky.
Speaker 3: That's that's not even a fucking talking.
Speaker 2: Point here, brother.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't know. I don't know what to categorize
Speaker 1: that as, and I don't I don't know. I mean,
Speaker 1: is it possible that it's a natural earth phenomenon that
Speaker 1: maybe spent some time away and is now reappearing. You know,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of theories that that could be possible.
Speaker 1: To say that they're aliens, okay, I mean some people
Speaker 1: claim that they're speaking with them, ah right, I mean,
Speaker 1: how much credence do we lend to channelers, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean. Like at that point, like I don't
Speaker 1: lend a lot of credence to channelers, to be honest
Speaker 1: with you, because I think much the vast majority are
Speaker 1: full of shit, you know, and they they want to
Speaker 1: be chandelers, and maybe they might even I don't know,
Speaker 1: come close to achieving it, yeah, a little bit, you know,
Speaker 1: but most people they're doing it for likes, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean. Like the Internet is a place where,
Speaker 1: you know, it's fueled by likes, it's vueled by views,
Speaker 1: and the only way that you're gonna get all the
Speaker 1: likes in the views is if you make it spectacular.
Speaker 1: And that spectacularness isn't always you know, it's not always
Speaker 1: gonna happen for every single post, like, but for some reason,
Speaker 1: like naturally, it does. And so I don't know, I
Speaker 1: don't know what to make of it. I know that
Speaker 1: what we're seeing, it's being seen all over the world.
Speaker 1: Like it's not just a New Jersey thing, it's not
Speaker 1: just a California thing. It's not even just an American thing.
Speaker 1: It's literally being seen in France, in Germany, in the
Speaker 1: UK and like Australia, Brazil, Like you name it. Like,
Speaker 1: people are getting videos of these orbs all over the
Speaker 1: fucking place. And as a matter of fact, it's another
Speaker 1: thing that is being banned off of social media now.
Speaker 1: It was Remember how I had mentioned that, no, I
Speaker 1: hadn't seen no videos of this kind of shit on Facebook,
Speaker 1: on Instagram, on Twitter, on YouTube. I was only seeing
Speaker 1: it on TikTok. Remember I told you that just a
Speaker 1: couple of weeks ago, or now talk is getting banned dog.
Speaker 1: Oh dude, they had If you type in hashtag org
Speaker 1: orb on TikTok, it's going to bring up nothing. It's
Speaker 1: being banned, like the word orb is being banned. And
Speaker 1: so what people started doing is is that they started
Speaker 1: coming up with a code name for it, right, and
Speaker 1: so they force they have. So the code name they
Speaker 1: came up for it was hashtag door bag the your bag. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm guessing it was a woman that came up with it.
Speaker 1: But I mean, that's cool whatever. I mean, look at
Speaker 1: it's just a term that we can all agree with.
Speaker 1: That's all it is anyway, that's all words are. But
Speaker 1: but it's like even that is getting banned, Like even
Speaker 1: the door bag hashtag is getting banned too. Like so
Speaker 1: you're not seeing it within the out rhythm. Bro, I
Speaker 1: had my TikTok algorithm tuned to where if there was
Speaker 1: a new ORB video like coming out, I was getting
Speaker 1: it every single time, like it was I fine tuned
Speaker 1: that TikTok. I'm not getting none of that shit now, dude.
Speaker 2: That's that's fucking hilarious. And I'm not coming at it
Speaker 2: as a dick who hates TikTok on that. That's fucking
Speaker 2: hilarious that they're even banning the ORB videos off of it.
Speaker 9: For what?
Speaker 2: Who benefits from this shit that's still ran by the
Speaker 2: CCP at this moment by Byte Dance, So like, why
Speaker 2: would they have any dog in the fight of orbs
Speaker 2: over America. By the way, they're still on TikTok, are
Speaker 2: they not.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you a little something. I've been doing
Speaker 1: a little bit more research into that whole TikTok shit,
Speaker 1: and yes there is. It's not to say that it's
Speaker 1: not owned by China. There are still people in China
Speaker 1: that hold ownership over that. But you know who holds
Speaker 1: the majority shares of Byte Dance take a while again,
Speaker 1: currently currently who owns the most amount of shares of
Speaker 1: Dancer right now, I'm not talking about a country, I'm
Speaker 1: talking about an organization.
Speaker 2: I would like to think the CCP, but also it
Speaker 2: depends on if they are you talking like which individual
Speaker 2: holds most or is it like you mean, like an organization.
Speaker 1: Which individual which organization? Take a while, guess it's not
Speaker 1: going to be that hard to figure out.
Speaker 3: I would think CCP.
Speaker 2: But I mean, it's been a crazy couple of weeks,
Speaker 2: so maybe there's been some some shifting of ownership.
Speaker 3: Tell me things, brother Blackrock, Uh, who could have guessed that?
Speaker 4: Rightly? Shit?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 1: Blackrock owns sixty percent of Byte Dance and now, and
Speaker 1: remember how we were talking about Oracle with Larry Ellison
Speaker 1: and shit like that. By the way, just to build
Speaker 1: on top of Larry Ellison and Oracle, the basically the
Speaker 1: the regulators of TikTok as far as what algorithms we're
Speaker 1: seeing in videos that we're allowed to see, what we're
Speaker 1: not allowed to see, and shit like that, tell me why, dude,
Speaker 1: fucking Larry Jellison has been butting up like buddy bodying
Speaker 1: with Trump here lately. And have you seen the AI
Speaker 1: created vaccines?
Speaker 2: No, that is being heard They were starting to use
Speaker 2: AI in medicine. That would make sense that this was
Speaker 2: coming eventually.
Speaker 1: But so it's specific, specific, personal to the person. Vaccines
Speaker 1: that are being created by AI that is working through
Speaker 1: guess who, Oracle, the same people that are monitoring everything
Speaker 1: that you look at online on social media. Why would
Speaker 1: Oracle have that kind of information? Why would Oracle have
Speaker 1: that kind of technology? The same Oracle that the first
Speaker 1: shareholders were the CIA, And they're going to try and
Speaker 1: tell you what specific vaccines like they actually give a
Speaker 1: fuck about you now. And this is where people are
Speaker 1: starting to really question the validity of like Trump bringing
Speaker 1: us in and saving us and shit like that. Not
Speaker 1: that we thought that, but you know where people are
Speaker 1: to question it.
Speaker 9: Bro.
Speaker 1: Trump is pro this mRNA vaccine that's being created through AI,
Speaker 1: through the company of Oracle and Larry Ellison.
Speaker 2: So you heard that Putin is trying to get Fauci
Speaker 2: extra diet to Russia to face crimes against humanity, and
Speaker 2: he's trying to work that into the peace negotiations in Ukraine.
Speaker 1: He said there is no peace unless I get Fauci. Bro, Like,
Speaker 1: fuck it, take him, Bro, I don't care about that.
Speaker 2: That is bold, and I might end up being a
Speaker 2: Putin supporter by the end of it all, Dude, I
Speaker 2: don't even know what to take that as, but I
Speaker 2: like it.
Speaker 1: As Brooke would say, the white hats are in control, sir, dude.
Speaker 2: Just the thought of Fauci taking hot dicks to the
Speaker 2: throat in a Russian gulog for the rest of his life,
Speaker 2: that that does my heart so much joy I can't
Speaker 2: even express it in words.
Speaker 1: I don't know if it's hot dicks they got. It's
Speaker 1: pretty cold over there, so cold.
Speaker 2: Dis Yeah, yeah, you're right. It's probably gonna be like
Speaker 2: in a Siberian gulog somewhere, so it's gonna be ice cold.
Speaker 2: But either way, fuck, I'm happy as hell to let
Speaker 2: this happen. I don't know if it's gonna actually come
Speaker 2: through to fruition.
Speaker 3: I hope it does. But anyway, all right, we're getting
Speaker 3: way off topic of Sycamore nol.
Speaker 2: So in conclusion, there is no actual answers to what
Speaker 2: this structure is, how it was made, where it came from,
Speaker 2: or what it's currently being used for.
Speaker 3: We know that it is putting off daily. It is
Speaker 3: putting off.
Speaker 2: Radio signals that can be picked up from ham radio operators.
Speaker 2: Now I haven't been able to find if it was
Speaker 2: a signal that is, like a message that can be decoded.
Speaker 2: I don't know if it's like beeps like a Morse
Speaker 2: code situation, or if it's a language, or if it's
Speaker 2: literally just a radio transmission signal. I couldn't find anything
Speaker 2: more on it, but confirmed by multiple HAM radio operators
Speaker 2: around the South California coast they can pick up a
Speaker 2: signal coming from Sycamore Noll.
Speaker 3: The object does not look to be naturally formed.
Speaker 2: The experts quote unquote that are saying that I think
Speaker 2: are absolutely ridiculous and or are a part of the
Speaker 2: story and trying to maintain the narrative. And Google satellites
Speaker 2: only blurred out these images in recent history. If we
Speaker 2: would have done this episode in twenty twenty, we would
Speaker 2: have been able to see the actual image of this.
Speaker 2: This is a relatively new as in within the last
Speaker 2: year they've blurred this out. Now, with all that in mind,
Speaker 2: China has recently launched submarines from underwater bases around the
Speaker 2: Chinese coastline.
Speaker 3: It is also equally possible that this is an.
Speaker 2: Underwater United States Naval base for the shipping and docking
Speaker 2: and repair and maintenance of certain United States submarines. It's
Speaker 2: equally possible that this has nothing to do with the
Speaker 2: United States government and this is from some sort of
Speaker 2: extraterrestrial entity or something like that.
Speaker 3: There's so many possibilities. But with everything presented, Jonathan, where
Speaker 3: are you at with it?
Speaker 1: I think it is the least likely that humans right
Speaker 1: now are doing anything with it. I think that it
Speaker 1: is either some kind of ancient structure that the water
Speaker 1: came up or whatever. Maybe they even built it underwater.
Speaker 1: Who knows, this could have been. We don't know what
Speaker 1: the you know, what they were up to two three, well,
Speaker 1: two thousand years ago, but five thousand years ago, two
Speaker 1: thousand years ago, I don't know. I don't know what
Speaker 1: the what the hell they were doing, But I could
Speaker 1: see how people might lend a little credence to it
Speaker 1: possibly being a UFO base. And you got all that,
Speaker 1: all that activity. And remember whenever they were talking about
Speaker 1: that article from nineteen ninety two, whenever people saw hundreds,
Speaker 1: not one, not two, hundreds of UFOs over this very
Speaker 1: area back in nineteen ninety two, it was quite a spectacle.
Speaker 1: Like you couldn't just say all one person saw that,
Speaker 1: no a lot of people saw that, All of Santa
Speaker 1: Monica saw it back in nineteen ninety two.
Speaker 2: Bro.
Speaker 1: That's where I'm like, yeah, okay, I I could see
Speaker 1: how this could possibly be some kind of underwater military base,
Speaker 1: so we don't know what the hell's in there. It
Speaker 1: could be some kind of portal that is just covered
Speaker 1: up by this. But why would they make it such
Speaker 1: an obvious kind of colosseum like structure like that. If
Speaker 1: it's just a portal or something like that, you.
Speaker 2: Know, I'll say this. Hundreds of sightings were had in
Speaker 2: ninety two, so much so that they had to launch an.
Speaker 3: Exploration in ninety five. They did.
Speaker 2: They don't just do that for the fuck of it, brother,
Speaker 2: No way, and especially the Cold War ended in ninety one,
Speaker 2: Like if the distrust of Russia was still extremely high
Speaker 2: in the early nineties, the people wouldn't have just taken
Speaker 2: that lying down. The government wouldn't have just oh well,
Speaker 2: you know, it's just one of those things. The fuck
Speaker 2: they would have even though it was the Clinton administration.
Speaker 2: No way, absolutely, no way.
Speaker 1: Oh man, I'm just so excited to see what is
Speaker 1: going to happen with all these orbs and all the
Speaker 1: alien sightings and all this kind of crazy shit, Like
Speaker 1: I hope that we eventually figure out this year, you know,
Speaker 1: Like I mean, Trump and that whole administration been saying
Speaker 1: that they're going to try and get to the bottom
Speaker 1: of the whole drone slash ORB situation. I'm excited to
Speaker 1: see what's gonna come from that. I mean, I hope,
Speaker 1: like I hope that that is like a Golden Age
Speaker 1: type of thing that is going to happen. That we're
Speaker 1: slowly starting to get the soft launch of whatever the
Speaker 1: aliens are here for. If they are alien, if maybe
Speaker 1: they're interdimensional, I don't know what the fuck is going on,
Speaker 1: but like I'm excited, and this base possibly could play
Speaker 1: into that.
Speaker 2: I think it very well may. And there's at least
Speaker 2: some sort of Internet's presence saying that the orbs launched
Speaker 2: out of Sycamore Nole are those things that started the
Speaker 2: LA fires. I personally am not of that belief, But
Speaker 2: same time, it's not like I have anything to base
Speaker 2: my belief off of. We saw how the three main
Speaker 2: fires started at the exact same time with each other,
Speaker 2: showing some sort of coordination that have been human arsonists
Speaker 2: that were terroristic in nature that did it at a
Speaker 2: specific time in a specific way. Possibly could that have
Speaker 2: been from direct energy weapons being fired from some sort
Speaker 2: of source, satellite or otherwise at the exact same time.
Speaker 2: Possibly could that have equally been ORBS or some sort
Speaker 2: of other UAP slash USP that was being launched from
Speaker 2: the underwater alien base at Sycamore Nole. Brother, Look, there's
Speaker 2: nothing to say more to one or the other. It's
Speaker 2: all equally open to conjecture at this time. But I
Speaker 2: did think it was kind of serendipitous that I stumbled
Speaker 2: into this rabbit hole at.
Speaker 3: This time in history.
Speaker 2: And I really do hope that all the good cult
Speaker 2: members enjoyed this episode and hopefully all learned a little
Speaker 2: bit some about this. I hope y'all do y'all's own research,
Speaker 2: y'all find some more craziness about this and let us
Speaker 2: know about it, because the sources are kind of scant
Speaker 2: on it. But I know we have cult members in
Speaker 2: California who may know some more of the local legends
Speaker 2: and local lore arounding this. I don't know what to
Speaker 2: make of it all though, Bro, It's fascinating.
Speaker 1: It is it is, And also I don't know why
Speaker 1: they necessarily need the term USP for the submersible because UAP.
Speaker 1: It was at first UAP was unidentified aerial phenomenon, but
Speaker 1: now they're calling it unidentified anomalous phenomenon. So it wouldn't
Speaker 1: necessarily have to be from the air. It could be anything.
Speaker 1: It's a it's a it's an anomaly, right.
Speaker 3: I didn't know that they had changed the acronym to
Speaker 3: a different one already.
Speaker 2: Okay, So yeah, USO, UFO, UAP and other UAP, all
Speaker 2: of them kind of within the same ballpark.
Speaker 3: Maybe they're connected, maybe they're not.
Speaker 2: Like, I don't know what to call it, but you know,
Speaker 2: like I said, when there's too many flags on the play,
Speaker 2: too many eyebrows had been raised.
Speaker 3: We simply must talk about it, and we must do
Speaker 3: an episode on it.
Speaker 2: And good cult members, if you enjoyed this episode, if
Speaker 2: you found it entertaining or informative, or you think this
Speaker 2: is absolute malarkey, and you would like to let us
Speaker 2: know about.
Speaker 3: It, then play at this time.
Speaker 2: Hit the five stars, hit the shares of like subscribes
Speaker 2: to comments.
Speaker 3: Leave a postly review, and shares, hit their friends of
Speaker 3: the family, shares everywhere. Here's the deal.
Speaker 2: The more activity the algorithm sees across all of our
Speaker 2: listening platforms, the more we get promoted to more potential
Speaker 2: listeners who could then become potential coulte members like theirs
Speaker 2: of you.
Speaker 3: Fine ladies and gentlemen.
Speaker 2: Why are you ready to go check out metamisteries Jonathan's
Speaker 2: of the program and give him the five star reviews
Speaker 2: and the positivity over there. Go check out Kate and
Speaker 2: that YouTube channel and give me the subscribes and the
Speaker 2: shares on that channel.
Speaker 3: And we thank you for everybody. He's already gone and
Speaker 3: done so.
Speaker 1: And with that being said, this was another beautiful episode
Speaker 1: of the Cult of Conspiracy. And my name is Jonathan,
Speaker 1: I'm Jack and there's one very important, extremely vital piece
Speaker 1: of information we need you to learn just as soon
Speaker 1: as surely possible.
Speaker 2: Hey, cult members, Jacob here just want to ask who
Speaker 2: wants better sex? The best way to get started is
Speaker 2: to go to Adam and Eve dot com Right now.
Speaker 2: Adam and Eve is offering fifty percent off just about
Speaker 2: any item, but that's not all. When you get one item,
Speaker 2: they will also send three bonus sexy items and six
Speaker 2: free movies. They offered a screen shipping as your privacy
Speaker 2: is a priority. Plus free shipping on your entire order.
Speaker 2: Doesn't matter how much you spend or what you buy.
Speaker 2: All we packaged and sent discreetly for free. That's fifty
Speaker 2: percent off one item and ten free gifts to boot
Speaker 2: bring more pleasure and satisfaction into your bedroom. Just go
Speaker 2: to Adam and Eve dot com and select any one item.
Speaker 2: It could be an adventurous new toy or anything you desire.
Speaker 2: Just enter the offer code Cult at checkout and you'll
Speaker 2: get fifty percent off almost any item, plus ten free gifts,
Speaker 2: three bonus items, six free movies, and free shipping. Use
Speaker 2: the offer code CULT that see Ult at Adam and
Speaker 2: Eve dot com. Now, this is an exclusive offer specific
Speaker 2: to this pot podcast, so be sure to use this
Speaker 2: code to get you not just the discount and the
Speaker 2: free goodies, but also the one hundred percent free shipping
Speaker 2: with the code Cult