Speaker 1: And Hi, how are you welcome, one and all to
the Big Podcast on this Tuesday. Today is the second
day of June, Year of Our Lord, twenty twenty six.
Mon name is Tom Sullivan, and it is an election
day in six states today, so we are well, there's
no there's a bunch of them California, Iowa, Montana, New Jersey,
New Mexico, and South Dakota. So the last one, the
furthest west is California. Polls close it eight o'clock tonight
Pacific daylight time. So those of us on the East coast,
let's go of you a late night. And they're so slow.
They are always so slow. I don't understand what their
problem is. Why is California, I mean, it's the it's
the home of technology, isn't it. Can't they find some
way to count those ballots faster? Anyway, So we got
we got a bunch to go over there. We've got
the update on the war, the slush fund which has
been put on pause. Not sure what that means, but
and Vanilla Ice talking about them, cancelation of the Big Party,
the Great American State Fair that was supposed to be
held over a period of a few weeks late this
month and early next month. But let's start. Let's get
the update on the war, because as we left you
yesterday late in the day, Iran says, you know what,
we're not We're going to stop the negotiations. We're not
going to continue to talk. And the President came out
and said the negotiations are going at a rapid pace.
So I'm not quite sure if anybody's talking or not.
I want to start with something that was very insightful.
This was after the word came out that the Iranians
were going to stop their talking, but it was before
President Trump and President bb Net and Yahoo of Israel,
before they had their apparently a blowout phone conversation. Now,
these two guys have known each other for decades and
they considered each other to be friends. But even with friends,
sometimes you know, you you just don't have a good
phone call. So apparently it degraded because of the fact
that Donald Trump wants Israel to stop military action in Beirut,
in Lebanon against Hesbelah, and Iran says, we're not talking
anymore because of Lebanon and Israel. So they're tying that
into it. That is Iran's excuse for stopping their negotiations.
The problem is Benjamin Nette Yahoo is sitting there as
the leader of Israel trying to protect his people, and
Jack Keene talks about it so far that they have
supplied Iran has supplied his Blah with thousands and thousands
and thousands of missiles over the forever, and so they
have a big inventory of missiles and they are firing
missiles into Israel every single day, to the tune of
they've fired a couple of thousand of them, and you
expect bb Net and Yahoo to sit on his hands
and not respond. So that's kind of the nut that's
going that's causing all these problems. Let's start with Iman Jabbers.
He's a Washington based guy for CNBC. He picked up
the phone and called the president late yesterday and had
a conversation. It wasn't recorded, but here's Jabbers basically going
through the transcript of.
Speaker 2: The call that do you think the negotiations are over
now or is this a bluff by the Iranians? The
President said, I don't care if they're over Honestly, I
really don't care. I couldn't care less if they're over there.
Over if they're not. You know, I think they took
too much time. Frankly, I think they started to get
a little boring. The President said he thinks that the
Iranian side was tapping us along, that is, that they
were stalling for time. Ultimately, on oil prices, the President
was confident that. He said, oil will be dropping like
a rock. He said, Ultimately, if the Iranians want to
try and have a nuclear weapon, I will blow them
up to Kingdom come. He said. What this is all
about for him is a strongly held conviction that the
Iranians should not ever be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.
And then American voters will tolerate higher gas prices as
long as they know what the goal is here. I
also asked him about net and Yahoo and the Israelis.
I asked, it seems to be that the Iranians are
saying they're not going to negotiate until Israel stops attacking
in Lebanon. Have you talked to Netan Yahoo about it?
I asked the President. He said, this is about forty
minutes ago. He said no, But I'm going to ask
him what's going on with Lebanon. They've been fighting for
a long time now. Since our call. Just in the
past couple of minutes, we've seen a report on Reuters
that crossed the wires a short time ago suggesting that
the present and has now called natan Yahoo to discuss that.
But at the time that he and I spoke, he
suggested that, in fact, they had not talked yet.
Speaker 1: So then I asked him, you know.
Speaker 2: What is the endgame here in terms of the Strait
of Hormuz, How ultimately are we going to get out
of the situation that we're in. The President said he
thinks that NATO should come in and help the United
States out. He said, they're the ones he said, we
don't use the Strait, we don't need it. We have
a lot of oil. And I said, have you talked
to anybody at NATO about that? Have they changed their
tune on coming in to help the United States and
the Strait? He said they would if I wanted to,
But we don't need them. We don't need NATO. They
were very weak and very sad. And the last thing
I would leave you with is this idea of you know,
where we go from here? I asked the President, when
all this is over, how do you bring this to
an end? If negotiations are not happening and the ceasefire
is in place, I asked him, is it time to
end the ceasefire? And the President said, we'll see. Let's
say I knew exactly what you know, what you're asking
me to do, and I sort of do know it,
why would I tell you? So the President there suggesting
that he does have a plan that he's not going
to talk to the media about naturally to end this situation.
But clearly the President suggesting that he doesn't care that
negotiations have wound down with the Iranians, and he thought
that the Iranians stringing the US along in the first place,
and that those negotiations took too long.
Speaker 1: So that was a conversation that Emon Jabbers from CNBC
had with the President late yesterday afternoon. And so if
he doesn't care and then there's no ongoing negotiations and
there's no military action, what happens next. Well, Ryan Crocker
has been our ambassador to a lot of the Middle
Eastern countries, and he was asked that exact question, what
happens now.
Speaker 3: We're clearly anywhere close to any kind of comprehensive or
detailed agreement what's in play right now is whether the
ceasefire continues or it doesn't. And it was an extraordinary
phone call between President Trump and Prime Minister Netnia who
I can't think of a single time in a long
and checkered career when a president of the United States
has spoken to an Israeli prime minister.
Speaker 4: In that way.
Speaker 3: I cannot recall an incident, and I've been through a
lot of Israeli conflicts in Lebanon and elsewhere. Well, it
tells me that President Trump has enormous influence over net
Nyahu one. Two, that he really really really wants this
ceasefire to endure in Iran and recognizes that the Lebanese
situation is key to that. And three it demonstrates that
to the IRGC, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard leadership of Iran,
that they have got tremendous influence over Trump.
Speaker 1: So what happens next. Does that mean that bb NET
and Yahoo will stop the fighting with Lebanon. Well, we're
going to find out.
Speaker 3: I think the fact that he got the ceasefire in
the first place indicates he has a considerable amount of influence.
Nett Nyajou did not want to stop the fighting in Iran.
He certainly didn't want to pause it in Lebanon. That
has been unpopular with Israeli public on both counts, and
clearly with his will of drones and other ordinance raining
down on northern Israel, he definitely does not want to
have to cease fire in Lebanon. So this is going
to be a real test of who has the upper
hand here.
Speaker 1: So we go back to General Keen and find out
what his thoughts are, as the situation with Iran is
very very fluid.
Speaker 5: Yeah, well, certainly we're in almost the eighth week now
of a ceasefire. President Trump has rolled up his sleeves
and he's got his team focused on trying to get
a peace deal here. And I think the people that
our negotiators are talk talking to are indicating to them
that they want to make a deal. But I believe
there's real tension in the organization of the regime itself,
and the military guys really have the leverage, and that's Vahiti,
who you mentioned that the Institute for Study of War
identified as the kingpin here, and you can see what
he is doing to undermine negotiations. For weeks now, his
forces have been attacking in the straits of a moves
in a Gulf area while as we were trying to
ease shipping through there, kind of do it quietly. We
can do that under the cease fire. It's not a
violation of it, certainly to move shipping in the lane
that we cleared, and we've moved a lot of them
through there, some seventy plus. But he's been attacking them,
and we've been obviously responding to that. They shut down
one of our drones that was flying in international waters
just recently, and we went after the air defense system
and the commander control system that did that. They fired
at the Arab States from time to time at US
base is this week, all undermining negotiations, and then we
have this debacle going on in Lebanon. April of seventeenth
was the beginning of the special ceasefire in Lebanon with
terms of agreement, and almost immediately Hesbelah has violated. So
here we are much less than two months and as
we indicated, they have fired rockets and drones two four
hundred times into northern Israel, over three hundred wounded civilians.
Many of the towns in Northern Israel and villages have
had to be evacuated. Israel cannot sustain them. Nobody could.
We couldn't sustain any attack across our border into our
southern towns. Drones from a cartel did something like that.
So Israel responded, and they kept coming and kept coming,
and then they decided to expand. And as a result
of that what happened. Hesbolo appeals to Iran after we've
killed three thousand of the Hesbela fighters. Now, remember this
is a ceasefire, and the Israelis are in a defensive mode,
only able to attack when an attack is eminent or
it is being executed. Otherwise, they can't conduct offensive operations.
But they were pushing out to conduct an offensive operation
and go after the stronghold to see if they could
finally shut this thing down. And that's when the Iranians
told the president they were going to stop negotiations. So
the president got involved and settled a new cease fire.
In my view, it's going to be violated by Hesbela initially,
just as the previous cease fire has been violated. So
who is charging Hesbela to do what they're doing. The
IRGC is they supervised the proxies Vahiti has his grip
on them. That's the reality of it. So they are
undermining negotiations, to be sure, and that's the tension in
the regime that the administration is facing, for sure, and
absolutely right the more you dragged this out. Their idea
here is that if they can drag this out closer
to the elections in the United States, and they watch
what we're doing here like a hawk. They're very tuned
into us. They believe, just like Russia and China believe
that if you ever get in conflict operation with the
United States, what you have to do is weaken the
political support for that operation with the American people. And
that's what this has a lot to do with. So
what they're saying to us, we get closer to the election,
it's less likely that President Trump would conduct military operations
if the negotiations just blow off. Well, I think that's
likely to be a miscalculation as far as I'm concerned
in terms of how they're interpreting President Trump.
Speaker 1: I have to remind you, not only did they say
we're not going to continue negotiations because of Israel and
his blaws fight, but they also minded the president they're
going to blockade the port or the straight of Horror Moves.
So that is back on the table.
Speaker 5: Yeah, they recognize it exceeded their expectations. Frankly, what happened.
They seized the straits of a moos largely through intimidation
and coercion, and they were able to get control of it.
And as a result of seizing the straits of a moose,
remember what happened, we went to a ceasefire and that
I think emboldened them. As a result of it. They
told us that they would go into negotiation with us
and work out a deal to open the straits of
a move. That's what enticed us into the negotiations. That
didn't happen, and then we slapped the navel blockade on them.
But yeah, they want to normalize their control of the
Straits of Moves as much as possible. I would suspect
one of the tension points in the negotiation is over
the fact that they still want to have some organizational
control over it. And that is absolutely hand off as
far as President Trump and his team as it should be.
We want them. This is international warners, freedom and navigation.
They have no right to make any territorial claims here whatsoever.
I think at some point here we're going to need
to take a hard look at returning to military action
here if we're going to move these people in the
right direction.
Speaker 1: Well, I've said it many times before, not even not
even a question. The general wants to go back using
military action. He wants to continue the military mission, which
was cut short. President had stopped them from continuing the
mission at about seventy percent of what the military was
set out to do. So we're waiting to see what's
going to happen on that. Well, let's get some other
topics in here, because also late yesterday we got word
that the one point eight billion dollar slush fund, the
weaponization fund, whatever you want to call it, there's actually
one billion, seven hundred seventy six million, get it, seventeen
seventy six, and that the President has agreed to put
it on pause. So what does that mean. Let's talk
to David Urban, who speaks Republican.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I did I think that Speaker thun along excuse me,
a majority Leader Thuon along with Speaker Johnson, probably had
a discussion with the President and.
Speaker 4: Looked at the political calculus.
Speaker 6: You have a handful of Senators now who are not
running for reelection, some of them because of the President's doing.
And Speaker Johnson probably similarly with Massey and Nancy Mason others,
and simply explained the President this was already pushing a
big rock up a hill, and it was going to
be pushing an even bigger rock, and he just simply
wasn't going to win. Under the law. You know, people
could still sue the federal government. There's you know, twenty
eight USC. Twenty seven to sixty one is the Federal
Tourt Claims Act. That's what Mike Flynn and Ashley Babbitt
suit under. They received settlements and compensations. So it's not
like there are aggrieved parties who are somehow who are
truly a grieved parties are going to somehow be shut
out from the courts. As the Congressman Fitzpatrick correctly points out,
there are funds appropriated from that, so we have to
see the Congress appropriates those funds every year for DOJ
to pay out of.
Speaker 4: That settlement fund. So we'll have to see.
Speaker 6: But it's not like the doors being closed forever just
on this one particular instance of this one point seven
point seven million billion dollar fund.
Speaker 4: Right, that's what's being shut down.
Speaker 1: But question now is is it being shut down? It
was put on pause according to the White House, and
that's a question that makes everybody nervous. Is the President
going to come back out and give this life again
the last day of his administration? So urban has it
right that if you are harmed by the government, you
can hire a lawyer and sue the government. And they
have a fund in their budget for paying out to
people that they have harmed. So all the people that
got harmed on whether it was January sixth or some
other date, they still can go to a lawyer and
sue the government, and if they are right, they will
get a check. We didn't need this one point eight
billion dollar weaponization fund.
Speaker 6: Donald Trump prides himself correctly on being able to sniff
out those eighty twenty issues. Right, He's on the right
side of all these eighty twenty issues. This is an
eighty twenty issue, but in the wrong direction. As Congressman
Fitzpatrick points out, there is nobody in Lower Bucks County,
or in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, or in Philadelphia County that
thinks this is a good idea.
Speaker 4: This is a loser of.
Speaker 6: An idea, and I think the President would slow to
realize that, but now is being shown the light by
again by the Majority leader and the Speaker of the
House and others who say, not only you know, are
you harming yourself, but you're harming our members. Is they're
going to run this, They're gonna have to take these votes,
these very tough votes they don't want to take, and
they're likely to vote against you.
Speaker 4: So yeah, I do believe he's burned a lot of
political capital here.
Speaker 1: So it's rare to see. But the president did back off.
At least it's on pause, and Congress now is talking
about maybe passing a law so that he can't bring
it back. But that's what people are worried about. And
speaking of politics, since today's a big day, let's start
with Jim Messina. Jim Messina is considered a guru in
the political campaign world because he ran the campaigns to
get Barack Obama elected and so ever since, people have
looked at Jim and said, boy, he already knows what
he's doing. So he was asked about not only the Democrats,
but the Democrats that are running for governor in California.
Here's Messina.
Speaker 7: Well, the governor's race, Will staid, no one seems to
want to be governor in California. Everyone thought Kamala Harris
was going to then everyone thought that Senator Alex Padilla
was going to run, and then everyone thought that ag
Rob Bonta was going to run. All of them declined
and instead you have this wide open race with a
historic amount of spending.
Speaker 4: And I'm really looking at it.
Speaker 7: The question is can Democrats get both two seats in
advance to the jungle primary. Doesn't look likely, but there's
a shot. Tom Steyer has been rising. It looks like
Exavierorbsera has the votes to get to the next round.
And the question is does stire go or does former
Fox News host Steve Hilton go. It'll be really interesting tonight.
It looks very, very close. And once again, is every
race you've been covering, this is about affordability. This is
about people out there saying everything is too expensive and
we want someone to come in and fix it. And
in the fourth largest economy in the world, California is
a really important barometer. In the mayor's race in La
you know, a bunch of very angry Los Angeles voters,
especially voters in the Palisades and other places, affect him
by the fire. They're very critical of the incumbent mayor,
looking at two challengers, one from the very left and
one from the very right, and the question is who's
going to get in that in that jungle primary runoff
in November. It is really unusual in California that we
have races and is close. Usually the party is decided
by now, but it shows you the kind of anger
of American voters, and that's no exception in the great
state of California.
Speaker 1: So did you hear Messina say that there are two people,
one from the very far left and one from the
very far right running for mayor, And that would be
the one on the very far left. Yes, she is.
What is her name? I don't even remember her name,
but she is. She is a very far, far far lefty.
And when you talk about Spencer Pratt, he's not a
right wing that job, not at all. I heard another
politician the other day talking about him like he was
some sort of nuts. So I went on the internet
and started looking around for why do people call Spencer
Pratt a nut? And the answer is that he had
a job as a villain on a reality TV show,
the MTV series The Hills. It was a part that
he played as a villain, So that's one of the
things that they cite. Secondly, conspiracy theories. He made apparently
bizarre public comments about climate change and stated he would
rather die than accept a government microchip implant. What else
has he got here on the list of things that
make him a nut? He has unconventional campaign. He launched
a highly eccentric campaign running on a platform of anti
corruption and public safety. All for heaven's sakes, this guy
is truly a nutjob, isn't he. That's what they consider
a far right nutjob in Los Angeles. Yeah, those were
comments that I read from various places that why they
thought he was a right wing nutjob. I think he
sounds terrific personally. But what about Bass Karen Bass, Well,
let's go back to Jim Assina, see what he thinks
about her.
Speaker 7: Well, she should be very worried no matter who's in
the runoff right now, there are people very angry. She's
acknowledged those mistakes. She's got to prove to people that
this election is about the future, not the past. When
I run campaigns, I say to people all the time,
it's these voters want to know where you're going to
take them, not where you've been, and she's having a
lot of problems with that. I know a lot of
people watching this morning are a little freaked out about
another reality star rising in American politics. But if you
look at Spencer Pratt's social media, the best I've ever seen.
I'm not saying he would be a good mayor, I'm
not saying he's a great candidate, but he's really taken
over this race with some really eventive AI outreach that
I think all campaigns on both sides of the Aisle
can learn from. We'll find out tonight if it's enough
to get him to the runoff.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so that's Jim Messina saying good things about Spencer Pratt. Meantime,
we haven't visited Harry Innton lately, the statistics guy, and
he has been looking at the Democrat Party because everybody
talks about and reports about how terrible Donald Trump's ratings are,
how they've just sunk like a rock. He's he's doing lousy,
on and on and on, Well what about the Democrats.
Listen to this from Harry Anton.
Speaker 8: The Democratic base is very much divide. I take a
chop right down the middle, and they are very dissatisfied
with the direction the party is. And you can see
it right here because this is I mean, hello, Democrats,
who are satisfied with the dem Party In twenty twenty six,
it's only about forty six percent. Fifty two percent are dissatisfied.
They're dissatid. This is Democrats. This is Democrats. We're dissatisfied
with their own party. The majority, now, I want to
put this into some context for you, which was Joe
Biden back in twenty twenty four put in arguably the
worst presidential debate I have ever seen, ever seen, and
yet fifty three percent of Democrats were actually satisfied with
Biden as the nominee. After that debate, the majority were satisfied.
And yet today a lower percentage, forty six percent are
actually satisfied with the party. So the Democratic Party, according
to the Democratic voters, well, their pissed offness, if I
could say, that.
Speaker 4: Has never been higher.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I think that's been true for quite a
few years. We people are not happy with Republicans or Democrats.
We're disgusted with the politicians more than we normally are.
So it's your vote is up for grabs as far
as politics goes. I know the people of Los Angeles
are angry. One of them is a woman I used
to work with at Fox Kennedy. She lives in Los Angeles.
She had her house was one of the houses that
burned down in the Palisades fire. Here she is talking
about her life as a Los ANGELESO.
Speaker 9: We're seeing people more ready, and I don't like seeing
them where they're at because people are so frustrated. They're
still incredibly traumatized, and they can't get back in their homes,
and so that's the driving factor for people in Pacific Palisades.
But you know this election is going to hinge on
who is most agitated, who is most activated. And it's
not the business as usual far left Democrats, because you know,
we have seen their workplay out before us. And right
now it's a horror show in downtown Los Angeles and
it's a tragedy and the West side of the city
where people, you know, they are completely displaced. They can't
get back into their homes, they can't get permits, they
can't get money from their insurance companies, so they are
turning to someone who feels their pain. But you know,
Spencer Pratt has also been really diving deep into the
homelessness issue. And I have yet to see Karen Bass
go to skid row. You know she likes to, Yeah,
she likes to talk about our Inside Safe program, But
you know, why not go and talk to some of
the zombies. You can't talk to them because they are
out of their minds, slumped over, brooling, giving their pets
fentanyl before they take it to see if their pets survive.
Speaker 1: No, she's right. They have a program in Los Angeles
that Karen Bass came up where she named it Inside Safe. Well,
they have spent three hundred and ninety one million dollars.
They got fifteen hundred to move into some sort of housing.
Forty seven percent of them have returned to the street.
And anybody who has ever worked with the homeless knows
there's a lot of them. First of all, it's heavy
mental illness and or drug addiction, or alcohol addiction, whatever
you want to go. It's a whole gamut. But there's
a large percentage of they don't want to be institutionalized,
they don't want to live in a building. I know
you do and I do, but they don't. So back
to Los Angeles. Here's a clip of Spencer Pratt talking
about what's going on in LA.
Speaker 10: I need to know about solar you know, Okay, I
need to focus on making sure the moms are safe
and the animals are not being abused.
Speaker 4: That's my party. I know. If you're the mayor, the
solar panels, that's going to be somebody I'm hiring. That's
my deputy mayor. Is gonna worry about the soul panels. No, Spencer,
I got bad news.
Speaker 5: If you're the mayor, you are going to have to
learn some of these issues, more solar panels.
Speaker 4: We were about three years from worrying about solar panels.
Speaker 10: We need to get all the naked drug addicts off
of the sidewalks and then I can worry about solar panels.
Speaker 1: That was a clip from the Bill Maher show and
Spencer Pratt was on there and Bill marsh and no, no, no,
you need to think about all these other issues like
solar panels, and he's I just I got to take
care of the human needs first. We can get the
solar panels. Somebody can work on that. He sounds very
down to earth, very common sense. So we'll watch and
see what happens with the elections in Los Angeles, see
if he makes the run off, or maybe if he
gets more than fifty percent, it would be done. I
believe one more of President Trump's ideas that is getting
shot down. That is the I things that are calling
it the Great American State Fair. And this was going
to be a series of concerts in Washington on the
Mall from late June through early July. And because of
the fact that five of the entertainers that were hired
have said, now we thought it was going to be
non political, but now we think it's going to be political.
So we're canceling. Martina McBride, Morris Day and the time
he had a hit in nineteen sixty he's nineteen eighty
four called Jungle Love. The Commodore is canceled, Brett and
Michaels and Young mc. All of those people are from
another era. They're back in the day. But one guy
who is not. He doesn't want to cancel, but the
event may be canceled, and that's Vanilla Ice the rapper.
Listen to what he has to say.
Speaker 4: I don't know.
Speaker 11: I can only speak for myself, and I'm proud to
be an American. I was born here and raised here,
and this is my country, and I don't like anybody
telling me I really can't be proud of it. And
is a huge honor to play the birth date.
Speaker 4: It's open. It's in a lifetime, you know, to fifty.
Speaker 11: So I'm honored, and I just you know, I respect
everybody else. I know there's a lot of tension everywhere.
This whole world is like a snow globe. But it
shouldn't be that. And music is here to bring people together, man,
and you know it shouldn't be that this music is
dragged into politics. It's not fair, you know. I don't
even vote. I'm not a politician. I don't have anything that.
I don't have the first thing to say about how
to run a country or do anything like that. I
think there's a huge honor and I'm wanting to celebrate
the country. I was born and raised in Man, and
we didn't take things so serious back in the nineties.
Speaker 4: I feel sorry for these kids today.
Speaker 11: Man. You know, I have kids, so I know, and
it's a different world. I mean, these computers have kind.
Speaker 4: Of ruined the world.
Speaker 11: If you ask me, I think we should all go
back to the nineties in the eighties when it was
just you know, having fun and zekav Ricci's and you
just go out and you rip your back seat and
you put subwoofers in and you enjoy going to Blockbuster.
That's all we're doing, is is celebrating the birthday of
our country.
Speaker 1: What's the big deal here?
Speaker 11: And as far as entertainers, I don't think it's fair
to put any of us on a pedestal like that
as far as politics goes, because you know, it shouldn't matter.
Speaker 4: We're just here to play.
Speaker 11: I play for anybody, so it's you know, I go
play for Biden's family or anybody. It doesn't matter. It's
all about just enjoying music. There's fans everywhere.
Speaker 1: That's Vanilla Ice. So he says he's still willing to show,
but I don't know if they're going to. I think
Donald Trump canceled the event and said that he will
be he will be the star of it. He will
do basically a Trump rally, And so all the people
on the left are groaning and all the people on
the right are disappointed. So's we'll see what if Vanilla
Ice gets a slot on the celebrating our country's two
hundred and fiftieth birthday. Well, and speaking of celebrating, Wall
Street celebrated a little bit today. We have a new
record on the Dow. We have a new record on
the S and P five hundred. In fact, the S
and P five hundred, this is the ninth day in
a row that it has gone up. It has only
risen this fast four times since World War II. So
getting pretty lofty in here. But here's the numbers. The
Dow today, new record high, up two hundred and twenty eight.
The Dow at fifty one thousand and three oh seven,
SMP new record up ten. The Nasdaq not a new record,
but still going up seven points today. The price of
gold was up thirteen dollars to four thouy five nineteen,
and oil up a buck and a half to ninety
just under ninety four dollars for one barrel of oil.
So that's it for today. Thank you for coming by.
We will be back again tomorrow. I hope to see
you then tomorrow. I hope to see you then.
Speaker 6: Yeah,