WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the

2
00:00:03.160 --> 00:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're going to begin taking

3
00:00:07.160 --> 00:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a look at the Bill Gates transcript, and we're going

4
00:00:10.919 --> 00:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to pick up right at the start with Bill Gates

5
00:00:14.039 --> 00:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>giving his opening statement after he was sworn in. Mister Gates,

6
00:00:20.640 --> 00:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>mister chairman, ranking member members of the Committee, thank you

7
00:00:24.719 --> 00:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>for the opportunity to appear before you today. I'm here

8
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to answer your questions about my interactions with Jeffrey Epstein

9
00:00:31.719 --> 00:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and to help contribute to the Committee's important work. I

10
00:00:34.920 --> 00:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>support the release of all the Epstein files and sincerely

11
00:00:38.640 --> 00:00:41.759
<v Speaker 1>hope that, through your efforts and those of others advocating

12
00:00:41.759 --> 00:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>on their behalf, the survivors of Epstein's crimes, Epstein's crimes

13
00:00:46.679 --> 00:00:50.399
<v Speaker 1>can get the justice that they deserve. At the outset,

14
00:00:50.600 --> 00:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to state very clearly, I never witnessed, nor

15
00:00:53.560 --> 00:00:57.759
<v Speaker 1>had any indication that Epstein was engaged in ongoing criminal conduct.

16
00:00:58.359 --> 00:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I never went to his island or his Florida home.

17
00:01:02.200 --> 00:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I have never victimized anyone. While he may have sought

18
00:01:06.040 --> 00:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the foster a personal relationship, I was never interested in

19
00:01:09.040 --> 00:01:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that and never reciprocated. I was introduced to Epstein in

20
00:01:13.040 --> 00:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty eleven, through people I trusted in my professional and

21
00:01:16.680 --> 00:01:20.239
<v Speaker 1>philanthropic work, Epstein claimed that he could raise billions of

22
00:01:20.280 --> 00:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars for global health from people for whom he provided

23
00:01:24.519 --> 00:01:28.439
<v Speaker 1>tax and estate services. I recall being aware that Epstein

24
00:01:28.480 --> 00:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>had faced prior to legal issues, but I did not

25
00:01:30.840 --> 00:01:33.719
<v Speaker 1>fully understand the extent of the crimes that he committed.

26
00:01:34.799 --> 00:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>I accepted the introduction without applying the scrutiny I should have.

27
00:01:39.239 --> 00:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>For almost two decades, my full time focus has been

28
00:01:42.319 --> 00:01:46.239
<v Speaker 1>global health and education. I've been guided by the belief

29
00:01:46.319 --> 00:01:49.519
<v Speaker 1>that all lives have equal value, and every child should

30
00:01:49.519 --> 00:01:51.879
<v Speaker 1>have the chance to live a healthy life, no matter

31
00:01:51.920 --> 00:01:55.359
<v Speaker 1>where they were born. I have committed all my resources

32
00:01:55.560 --> 00:01:58.079
<v Speaker 1>and my time to this effort, but my wealth alone

33
00:01:58.319 --> 00:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>cannot fill the enormous funding gap that remains. This is

34
00:02:01.719 --> 00:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>why trying to encourage others of significant means to invest

35
00:02:05.480 --> 00:02:08.879
<v Speaker 1>in global health has become such an important element of

36
00:02:08.879 --> 00:02:13.159
<v Speaker 1>my work. My interactions with Epstein began with a limited

37
00:02:13.240 --> 00:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>number of preliminary meetings, three in twenty eleven and two

38
00:02:16.840 --> 00:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twelve, during which I talked about my goals

39
00:02:20.319 --> 00:02:24.759
<v Speaker 1>of my work. We began more extensive conversations in twenty

40
00:02:24.840 --> 00:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>thirteen and twenty fourteen. The discussions focused on identifying potential

41
00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:33.319
<v Speaker 1>giving structures such as donor advice funds and how to

42
00:02:33.400 --> 00:02:38.479
<v Speaker 1>enroll individuals he claimed more interested in making significant contributions.

43
00:02:39.039 --> 00:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I made it clear to Epstein from the outset that

44
00:02:41.280 --> 00:02:43.319
<v Speaker 1>he would never play a role in any of the

45
00:02:43.400 --> 00:02:49.039
<v Speaker 1>work or receive any compensation. In twenty fourteen, after Epstein

46
00:02:49.080 --> 00:02:52.479
<v Speaker 1>brought together a group he described as potential donors, I

47
00:02:52.599 --> 00:02:56.199
<v Speaker 1>realized that our prior discussions, which should have translated into

48
00:02:56.280 --> 00:03:00.319
<v Speaker 1>meaningful philanthropic support, were a dead end. It was clear

49
00:03:00.400 --> 00:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that no one in the group was interested enough to

50
00:03:02.599 --> 00:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>move forward. At that point, I concluded Epstein would never

51
00:03:06.120 --> 00:03:09.639
<v Speaker 1>deliver on his promises. I told him we would go

52
00:03:09.719 --> 00:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>no further and stop communicating or meeting with them. No

53
00:03:13.520 --> 00:03:16.719
<v Speaker 1>vehicle for charitable giving was ever created, and no funds

54
00:03:16.759 --> 00:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>were ever raised. Our interactions ended in December of twenty fourteen,

55
00:03:21.759 --> 00:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>four years before new reports in the press and unsealed

56
00:03:25.280 --> 00:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>court documents shed additional light on the extent of his crimes.

57
00:03:29.479 --> 00:03:32.479
<v Speaker 1>It was during the same time period that an employee

58
00:03:32.520 --> 00:03:35.639
<v Speaker 1>was in the process of transitioning out of my private office.

59
00:03:36.080 --> 00:03:39.599
<v Speaker 1>This employee engaged Epstein to negotiate and advise them on

60
00:03:39.639 --> 00:03:42.759
<v Speaker 1>the terms of the separation. I did not ask, nor

61
00:03:42.759 --> 00:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>did I want or need Epstein to be involved in

62
00:03:45.439 --> 00:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>this matter. His involvement resulted in email exchanges, calls, and

63
00:03:50.159 --> 00:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>meetings with members of my team and me. However, the

64
00:03:53.400 --> 00:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>agreement we ultimately reached was not any different from what

65
00:03:57.080 --> 00:03:59.879
<v Speaker 1>was previously agreed upon months in advance of Epstein in

66
00:04:00.000 --> 00:04:03.479
<v Speaker 1>axserting himself. It was after this that I learned Epstein

67
00:04:03.520 --> 00:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>had become aware of sensitive information about my personal life,

68
00:04:08.039 --> 00:04:11.319
<v Speaker 1>including the fact that I had been unfaithful in my marriage.

69
00:04:12.360 --> 00:04:15.439
<v Speaker 1>These affairs had nothing to do with my interactions with Epstein,

70
00:04:15.800 --> 00:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>but they were painful for my family. As the public

71
00:04:19.279 --> 00:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>can now see based on what has been released in

72
00:04:21.519 --> 00:04:25.639
<v Speaker 1>the files, Epstein was working to use information about my infidelities,

73
00:04:25.879 --> 00:04:28.439
<v Speaker 1>in addition to many lives that he layered on top

74
00:04:29.040 --> 00:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to pressure me to re engage with them. He was

75
00:04:32.079 --> 00:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>unsuccessful in this effort, but it shows some of the

76
00:04:35.040 --> 00:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>ways he tried to leverage his interactions with me to

77
00:04:37.800 --> 00:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>further his agenda. I should have never met with Epstein

78
00:04:41.199 --> 00:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. Based on what I know now,

79
00:04:43.680 --> 00:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I understand that even if he had delivered the donors

80
00:04:46.680 --> 00:04:49.759
<v Speaker 1>he promised, I would not have justified associating with them.

81
00:04:50.399 --> 00:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I see now that he sought to build an image

82
00:04:52.439 --> 00:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of legitimacy around himself, using connections to reputable and powerful

83
00:04:57.160 --> 00:05:01.759
<v Speaker 1>people to deflect scrutiny and attempt to rehabilitate his reputation.

84
00:05:02.680 --> 00:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I was so focused on the possibility of raising funds

85
00:05:05.480 --> 00:05:09.079
<v Speaker 1>for global health that I allowed that goal to override

86
00:05:09.079 --> 00:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>my better judgment. That is a sobering realization, and it

87
00:05:12.959 --> 00:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>has reinforced for me the importance of being more attentive

88
00:05:16.120 --> 00:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to how access and reputation can be manipulated by people

89
00:05:20.480 --> 00:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>acting in bad faith. In the work that I do,

90
00:05:23.560 --> 00:05:27.319
<v Speaker 1>reputation is the basis for developing partnerships that save lives.

91
00:05:27.920 --> 00:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Meeting with Epstein was a grave error in judgment, and

92
00:05:31.480 --> 00:05:35.959
<v Speaker 1>it put this work at risk. His behavior antithetical to

93
00:05:36.000 --> 00:05:38.879
<v Speaker 1>all my efforts to contribute to a world where everyone

94
00:05:38.920 --> 00:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>has a chance to live a healthy and productive life.

95
00:05:42.879 --> 00:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>If the time I spent with Epstein lent them credibility,

96
00:05:45.759 --> 00:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I am deeply sorry. I've learned a significant lesson and

97
00:05:49.839 --> 00:05:52.959
<v Speaker 1>am now far more careful about who I engage with.

98
00:05:53.519 --> 00:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Even in a limited capacity. I look forward to answering

99
00:05:57.079 --> 00:06:00.399
<v Speaker 1>all your questions about my interaction with Epstein and the

100
00:06:00.439 --> 00:06:04.639
<v Speaker 1>topics identified in the Chairman's invitation to appear today. The

101
00:06:04.639 --> 00:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>committee's work is essential. It's my sincere hope that those

102
00:06:08.759 --> 00:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>harm by Epstein's crimes will receive the justice that they deserve.

103
00:06:13.439 --> 00:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, mister Spector. Thank you, mister Gates. We've had

104
00:06:18.000 --> 00:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of extra members join, starting with the majority,

105
00:06:21.120 --> 00:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Can you please introduce yourself for the record, Lauren Bobert,

106
00:06:25.120 --> 00:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Eric Burlison, Congressman Steve Lynch, eighth Congressional District of Massachusetts.

107
00:06:30.800 --> 00:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Mister Spector, thank you. The time reads ten fifteen, and

108
00:06:34.560 --> 00:06:40.079
<v Speaker 1>the Majority's time will begin now. Mister Spector, still asking

109
00:06:40.120 --> 00:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the questions, mister Gates, I want to thank you again

110
00:06:43.240 --> 00:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>for coming here voluntarily to answer our questions today. I

111
00:06:46.959 --> 00:06:49.839
<v Speaker 1>want to start by very very briefly discussing your background.

112
00:06:50.240 --> 00:06:52.279
<v Speaker 1>I know, of course, you've had a very long and

113
00:06:52.519 --> 00:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>very very successful career. Can you provide the committee with

114
00:06:55.839 --> 00:07:00.199
<v Speaker 1>a brief summary of your career up until now? Answer? Yeah.

115
00:07:00.240 --> 00:07:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I was born in nineteen fifty five. I went to

116
00:07:02.519 --> 00:07:06.079
<v Speaker 1>high school in Seattle, graduated, I attended Harvard College for

117
00:07:06.079 --> 00:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>a few years, but did not complete a degree. I

118
00:07:08.879 --> 00:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>founded Microsoft in seventy five. I stayed as CEO of

119
00:07:12.639 --> 00:07:16.079
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft through the year two thousand. I stayed as Chief

120
00:07:16.079 --> 00:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Technical Advisor through two thousand and eight, so two thousand

121
00:07:19.279 --> 00:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and eight, and in my full time work at Microsoft,

122
00:07:22.639 --> 00:07:25.959
<v Speaker 1>overlapping that, I created the Gates Foundation in the year

123
00:07:26.000 --> 00:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand, so I gave a substantial gift of

124
00:07:28.399 --> 00:07:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft stock in the year of two thousand and so

125
00:07:31.519 --> 00:07:34.199
<v Speaker 1>between two thousand and two thousand and eight, I was

126
00:07:34.240 --> 00:07:38.279
<v Speaker 1>a full time Microsoft, part time Gates Foundation. Two thousand

127
00:07:38.279 --> 00:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and eight, I ceased my full time work at Microsoft

128
00:07:41.160 --> 00:07:43.959
<v Speaker 1>and began full time as chairman of the Gates Foundation.

129
00:07:45.040 --> 00:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And since two thousand and eight that's been my primary effort.

130
00:07:48.720 --> 00:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I still give some advice to Microsoft. I have some

131
00:07:51.800 --> 00:07:55.199
<v Speaker 1>energy innovation work under the term Breakthrough Energy, but my

132
00:07:55.240 --> 00:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>full time work is the work of the Gates Foundation,

133
00:07:58.160 --> 00:08:03.639
<v Speaker 1>which involves areas like education, global health, agriculture, financial services,

134
00:08:04.079 --> 00:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and so that's my primary work today. I turned seventy

135
00:08:07.160 --> 00:08:10.519
<v Speaker 1>last year. Question thank you, And to be clear, do

136
00:08:10.560 --> 00:08:13.399
<v Speaker 1>you hold any official position at any of your other

137
00:08:13.800 --> 00:08:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Do you currently hold any positions at any of your

138
00:08:16.759 --> 00:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>other ventures besides the Gates Foundation. Answer. Yeah, I have

139
00:08:21.120 --> 00:08:24.399
<v Speaker 1>some title with Breakthrough Energy. I'm not sure what that is.

140
00:08:24.879 --> 00:08:27.399
<v Speaker 1>I have an entity called Gates Ventures that is my

141
00:08:27.480 --> 00:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>private office, and I have a group that manages investments

142
00:08:31.120 --> 00:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>on my behalf and the foundation's trust behalf called Cascade.

143
00:08:35.679 --> 00:08:38.559
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's all of my official roles. Question.

144
00:08:38.639 --> 00:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, and we'll get to more, of course, into

145
00:08:41.000 --> 00:08:44.159
<v Speaker 1>your interactions with mister Epstein a little bit later. But

146
00:08:44.320 --> 00:08:46.799
<v Speaker 1>just to be clear for the record, your opening statement

147
00:08:46.840 --> 00:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>indicated that your relationship with them, your interactions with them,

148
00:08:50.960 --> 00:08:55.799
<v Speaker 1>occurred between twenty eleven and twenty fourteen, late twenty fourteen.

149
00:08:56.039 --> 00:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Is that right answer? That's right question. So for the

150
00:08:59.600 --> 00:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>entire day of that time, your primary role was at

151
00:09:02.360 --> 00:09:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the Gates Foundation. Is that right answer? Yeah? I mean

152
00:09:05.919 --> 00:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>I was doing the whole mix of things I do,

153
00:09:07.919 --> 00:09:10.399
<v Speaker 1>but yes, at all times since two thousand and eight,

154
00:09:10.720 --> 00:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that's been my primary role. Question and you were not.

155
00:09:14.360 --> 00:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>You didn't have a formal job at Microsoft during that

156
00:09:16.519 --> 00:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>time that you knew, mister Epstein. Is that right answer?

157
00:09:19.919 --> 00:09:23.519
<v Speaker 1>No question, And at this point philanthropy is your full

158
00:09:23.519 --> 00:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>time endeavor? Is that right answer? That's right? For some

159
00:09:26.639 --> 00:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of the energy innovation work, I use private investment vehicles,

160
00:09:30.159 --> 00:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and even the foundation itself often uses investments as part

161
00:09:33.960 --> 00:09:37.159
<v Speaker 1>of its overall strategy. But the work, the aim of

162
00:09:37.240 --> 00:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the work is philanthropic. Question. Thank you, and again, we'll

163
00:09:41.399 --> 00:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>get deeper into this a little bit later, but I

164
00:09:43.559 --> 00:09:46.759
<v Speaker 1>just want to do a high level lynch. We can

165
00:09:46.799 --> 00:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>hear the question, we can hear the answer, we can't

166
00:09:49.240 --> 00:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>hear the questions at all. Thank you, mister Emmer. We've

167
00:09:52.200 --> 00:09:56.399
<v Speaker 1>had another member join. Can they please announce themselves for

168
00:09:56.440 --> 00:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the record. William Timmins, South Carolina fourth Congressitional District. Question,

169
00:10:03.240 --> 00:10:07.039
<v Speaker 1>mister Gates, when did you first meet mister Jeffrey Epstein? Answer?

170
00:10:07.200 --> 00:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>It was January twenty eleven that I had dinner with them.

171
00:10:10.720 --> 00:10:14.519
<v Speaker 1>Question and was that at mister Epstein's home? Answer? His

172
00:10:14.600 --> 00:10:17.759
<v Speaker 1>home in New York. Yes. Question, can you describe the

173
00:10:17.799 --> 00:10:22.039
<v Speaker 1>circumstances that led you to attending that dinner? Answer? Doctor Nikolicch,

174
00:10:22.080 --> 00:10:24.639
<v Speaker 1>who worked for me, said that since I was out

175
00:10:24.639 --> 00:10:26.879
<v Speaker 1>in New York, I might be interested in having dinner

176
00:10:26.879 --> 00:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>with them, and so that got scheduled. Question He said

177
00:10:30.399 --> 00:10:32.759
<v Speaker 1>you might be interested in it. Did he say why

178
00:10:32.799 --> 00:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you might be interested in it. Answer, he probably gave

179
00:10:36.000 --> 00:10:39.519
<v Speaker 1>me a brief description that about Epstein. Question do you

180
00:10:39.519 --> 00:10:43.519
<v Speaker 1>recall what that description entailed? Answer? No, I don't. Question

181
00:10:43.879 --> 00:10:48.159
<v Speaker 1>What did you discuss in your first interaction with mister Epstein? Answer?

182
00:10:48.240 --> 00:10:50.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, it was a dinner that I would have

183
00:10:50.440 --> 00:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>talked about what I was doing. He would have mentioned

184
00:10:53.120 --> 00:10:55.519
<v Speaker 1>a number of scientists and people that he spent time

185
00:10:55.559 --> 00:10:58.399
<v Speaker 1>talking to. You know, it was kind of an introductory dinner,

186
00:10:58.639 --> 00:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and I don't remember all the specific question, so he

187
00:11:02.039 --> 00:11:03.919
<v Speaker 1>was sort of giving you an outline of the powerful

188
00:11:03.960 --> 00:11:05.879
<v Speaker 1>people that he knew. Is that what you mean by

189
00:11:05.919 --> 00:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that answer? More intellectual you know, professors or science people,

190
00:11:10.759 --> 00:11:13.279
<v Speaker 1>as well as some business leaders. I don't know if

191
00:11:13.320 --> 00:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it was that night or some other time, but he

192
00:11:16.639 --> 00:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>did talk about that he provided advice to lots of billionaires.

193
00:11:22.159 --> 00:11:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Question do you recall any specific names that he mentioned

194
00:11:24.799 --> 00:11:27.519
<v Speaker 1>to you? Answer not at the time. You know, he

195
00:11:27.600 --> 00:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about Wall Street billionaires, he talked about Middle East billionaires.

196
00:11:31.159 --> 00:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>He made it sound very extensive. Question did you get

197
00:11:34.320 --> 00:11:37.279
<v Speaker 1>the sense that he was offering you some kind of service? Answer? No.

198
00:11:37.960 --> 00:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Question Why do you think he was telling you about

199
00:11:40.120 --> 00:11:43.159
<v Speaker 1>the people that he worked with? Answer? Maybe for me

200
00:11:43.200 --> 00:11:44.919
<v Speaker 1>to have a good impression of them. You know, at

201
00:11:44.960 --> 00:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>some point, I don't think that first night, the idea

202
00:11:48.080 --> 00:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that some of those people might give money to Global

203
00:11:50.240 --> 00:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Health came up. Question I know you said you don't

204
00:11:53.360 --> 00:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>recall exactly the description that doctor Nikolach gave you about

205
00:11:57.039 --> 00:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>mister Epstein. But do you recall, if anything, you knew

206
00:12:00.320 --> 00:12:02.639
<v Speaker 1>about mister Epstein in general before you met him the

207
00:12:02.679 --> 00:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>first time? Answer? I was aware that he had a

208
00:12:05.440 --> 00:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>criminal conviction. Question how were you aware of that? Answer?

209
00:12:10.000 --> 00:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure either I looked it up or somebody

210
00:12:12.240 --> 00:12:16.159
<v Speaker 1>told me. Question did doctor Nikolicche tell you that? Answer?

211
00:12:16.159 --> 00:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. Question do you recall knowing at the

212
00:12:18.879 --> 00:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>time what the criminal conviction was for? Answer? I knew

213
00:12:22.600 --> 00:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>that it had to do with the sexual nature, But no,

214
00:12:25.120 --> 00:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I knew dug into the specifics, although

215
00:12:28.399 --> 00:12:31.919
<v Speaker 1>I probably should have. Question would you normally look into

216
00:12:31.919 --> 00:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>people's backgrounds before you meet with them? Was this an

217
00:12:35.240 --> 00:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>uncommon way of handling it? Answer? I don't have a

218
00:12:38.480 --> 00:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>formal process for people I meet. Question did you ask

219
00:12:42.480 --> 00:12:45.559
<v Speaker 1>mister Epstein about the conviction at any time? Answer? I

220
00:12:45.600 --> 00:12:48.039
<v Speaker 1>did not bring it up during the dinner. Answer and

221
00:12:48.080 --> 00:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>he didn't bring it up either. Answer no, question, did

222
00:12:51.279 --> 00:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>anyone ever raise concerns to you about mister Epstein with

223
00:12:54.559 --> 00:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>regard to that conviction or anything else in twenty eleven?

224
00:12:59.080 --> 00:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Answer well, throughout the time I spent with Epstein, the

225
00:13:01.480 --> 00:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>concern about his reputation was voiced by me and other people.

226
00:13:05.600 --> 00:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>So there was an awareness that he had a bad

227
00:13:07.639 --> 00:13:12.039
<v Speaker 1>reputation stemming from his criminal conviction. Question, and you're saying

228
00:13:12.279 --> 00:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that you were aware of these concerns early on. Were

229
00:13:15.320 --> 00:13:19.159
<v Speaker 1>you describing conversations that occurred later in your relationship with

230
00:13:19.200 --> 00:13:23.639
<v Speaker 1>mister Epstein. Answer I'd say both. Question, So you were

231
00:13:23.679 --> 00:13:26.519
<v Speaker 1>aware that he had a bad reputation and he had

232
00:13:26.559 --> 00:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>some sort of sex related conviction at the time you

233
00:13:28.759 --> 00:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>first entered into contact with him. Answer that's right. All right, folks,

234
00:13:34.360 --> 00:13:36.039
<v Speaker 1>We're going to wrap up right here, and in the

235
00:13:36.080 --> 00:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>next episode dealing with the topic, we're going to pick

236
00:13:38.159 --> 00:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>up where we left off. All the information that goes

237
00:13:41.120 --> 00:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>with this episode can be found in the description box.

238
00:13:45.080 --> 00:13:48.279
<v Speaker 1>What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the

239
00:13:48.320 --> 00:13:51.679
<v Speaker 1>Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're going to pick up

240
00:13:51.679 --> 00:13:55.080
<v Speaker 1>where he left off with Bill Gates and the transcript

241
00:13:55.360 --> 00:13:59.639
<v Speaker 1>from his interview with Congress. Question what were your first

242
00:13:59.639 --> 00:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>impress of mister Ebstein? Answer, Well, he talked about a

243
00:14:03.480 --> 00:14:06.039
<v Speaker 1>lot of scientists that he would talk to, were business

244
00:14:06.120 --> 00:14:08.759
<v Speaker 1>leaders he would talk to, and he made that sound

245
00:14:08.840 --> 00:14:11.879
<v Speaker 1>fairly extensive, you know, across a wide range of topics,

246
00:14:12.320 --> 00:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody who focuses time on a large number of subjects

247
00:14:16.159 --> 00:14:20.039
<v Speaker 1>and new people who were deeply engaged in those areas. Questions,

248
00:14:20.080 --> 00:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>So he made a good impression. Answer, you know, he's

249
00:14:22.960 --> 00:14:25.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of a unique person. You know, based on the

250
00:14:25.440 --> 00:14:28.759
<v Speaker 1>limited knowledge I have had at the time, it was

251
00:14:28.879 --> 00:14:30.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of a unique thing to have this large house

252
00:14:31.039 --> 00:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>in Manhattan and to mention quite a wide range of

253
00:14:33.960 --> 00:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>people from both business and academic areas. I would say,

254
00:14:37.519 --> 00:14:40.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, I thought that was unusual. Question who else

255
00:14:41.000 --> 00:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>was with you at this first dinner you had with

256
00:14:43.039 --> 00:14:46.879
<v Speaker 1>mister Epstein in twenty eleven? Answer for dinner itself, just

257
00:14:46.960 --> 00:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>doctor Nikolich? Question were other people traveling with you for that?

258
00:14:51.480 --> 00:14:54.159
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you meant? Answer? No questions who at

259
00:14:54.200 --> 00:14:57.639
<v Speaker 1>the dinner you were with doctor Nikolich, mister Ebstein and

260
00:14:57.679 --> 00:15:00.879
<v Speaker 1>nobody else was at the dinner? Is that right? Answer?

261
00:15:00.919 --> 00:15:04.399
<v Speaker 1>That's right? Question? And did you understand his job or

262
00:15:04.440 --> 00:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>career to be when you met with him. Answer, I'm

263
00:15:07.519 --> 00:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>not sure if it was at night, but over time

264
00:15:09.360 --> 00:15:12.799
<v Speaker 1>he suggested that he provided tax advice and advice on wills,

265
00:15:13.000 --> 00:15:15.559
<v Speaker 1>and a wide variety of people, both from Wall Street,

266
00:15:15.840 --> 00:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>from the Middle East. You know that he was in

267
00:15:18.159 --> 00:15:21.519
<v Speaker 1>a position of trust with a number of wealthy people.

268
00:15:22.399 --> 00:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Question and you said you didn't get the sense he

269
00:15:24.320 --> 00:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>was offering you any kind of service. So he wasn't

270
00:15:26.720 --> 00:15:29.679
<v Speaker 1>offering you the tax or estate services of any kind.

271
00:15:30.600 --> 00:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Answer No, There came a time later when he brought

272
00:15:33.000 --> 00:15:35.679
<v Speaker 1>it up, you know he could help on taxes, and

273
00:15:35.720 --> 00:15:39.279
<v Speaker 1>I rather sternly rebuff the effort. Question sure, and we

274
00:15:39.320 --> 00:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>can get more into that a bit later. So at

275
00:15:41.440 --> 00:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this point, meeting him for the first time in twenty eleven,

276
00:15:45.120 --> 00:15:50.279
<v Speaker 1>did you understand him to already be wealthy at that point? Answer? Well, certainly,

277
00:15:50.360 --> 00:15:54.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, just the house alone represented a significant amount

278
00:15:54.039 --> 00:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of wealth. I'd never seen. I don't think to this

279
00:15:57.039 --> 00:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>day I've seen a private house in Manhattan that's quite

280
00:15:59.480 --> 00:16:02.879
<v Speaker 1>that spacious. Yes. Question did you have any idea at

281
00:16:02.919 --> 00:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the time how he acquired his money? Answer? No, to

282
00:16:06.080 --> 00:16:09.159
<v Speaker 1>this day I find it a bit confusing question. And

283
00:16:09.240 --> 00:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>again we'll get a bit deeper into your interactions with

284
00:16:12.240 --> 00:16:15.679
<v Speaker 1>mister Epstein later, but just for now, could you briefly

285
00:16:15.759 --> 00:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>characterize the nature of the relationship that you had with

286
00:16:19.000 --> 00:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>mister Epstein between twenty eleven and twenty fourteen. Was he

287
00:16:23.159 --> 00:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a friend? Was he a business associate? Answer? No, he

288
00:16:27.559 --> 00:16:30.039
<v Speaker 1>certainly wasn't a friend. You know, he made an effort

289
00:16:30.080 --> 00:16:34.279
<v Speaker 1>to extend the relationship with various invitations, but you know, eventually,

290
00:16:34.320 --> 00:16:36.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, as I talked about my work in global

291
00:16:36.840 --> 00:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>health for the Gates Foundation, he suggested that he could

292
00:16:40.360 --> 00:16:43.279
<v Speaker 1>raise substantial amounts of money from people that he knew

293
00:16:43.320 --> 00:16:46.159
<v Speaker 1>to help with that endeavor, and he became the primary

294
00:16:46.159 --> 00:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>focus out in twenty thirteen, twenty eleven, we just had

295
00:16:50.759 --> 00:16:53.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, two dinners, one where it was with Jess

296
00:16:53.639 --> 00:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Daily and Larry Summers, one where he was just dropping by. So,

297
00:16:57.240 --> 00:17:00.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, three encounters in twenty eleven, and then over

298
00:17:00.679 --> 00:17:02.879
<v Speaker 1>a year passes, and I see him twice in late

299
00:17:02.919 --> 00:17:06.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve, and then it's I think spring twenty thirteen

300
00:17:07.559 --> 00:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>where this purported availability of people who then they would

301
00:17:11.240 --> 00:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>sit and talk about their wills, their taxes that as

302
00:17:14.799 --> 00:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>part of the process, they would realize they had significant

303
00:17:17.400 --> 00:17:20.279
<v Speaker 1>amount of access money and hopefully they would want to

304
00:17:20.319 --> 00:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>give that philanthropically, and hopefully they would consider giving that

305
00:17:23.759 --> 00:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to global health. So that became the focus in spring

306
00:17:27.240 --> 00:17:30.839
<v Speaker 1>of twenty thirteen. Question, so you said he would give

307
00:17:30.880 --> 00:17:36.799
<v Speaker 1>invitations for things. Were these social functions or philanthropic or otherwise? Answer? No,

308
00:17:36.920 --> 00:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>they weren't social. I mean, there was one time at

309
00:17:39.440 --> 00:17:42.079
<v Speaker 1>the end of a dinner David Blaine came and so

310
00:17:42.519 --> 00:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that was a lighter thing. He's a magician. But the

311
00:17:45.440 --> 00:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>meetings they were always about the world and you know

312
00:17:48.200 --> 00:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>what was going on. Obviously when somebody like Larry Summers

313
00:17:51.839 --> 00:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>or Jess Daley is there, they're talking about what they

314
00:17:54.759 --> 00:17:56.759
<v Speaker 1>see in the world, what they expect. So it's a

315
00:17:56.759 --> 00:18:01.039
<v Speaker 1>wide ranging discussion. Question So did you ever socialized with

316
00:18:01.119 --> 00:18:04.079
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Epstein? Answer no, I would not say I was

317
00:18:04.119 --> 00:18:06.599
<v Speaker 1>socializing with him. I was at a dinner where a

318
00:18:06.640 --> 00:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>wide range of serious topics came up. When he, for example,

319
00:18:10.119 --> 00:18:12.319
<v Speaker 1>invited me to come to his island, that would have

320
00:18:12.359 --> 00:18:15.559
<v Speaker 1>been socializing and I didn't do that. You know, one

321
00:18:15.599 --> 00:18:17.519
<v Speaker 1>time in Paris he asked me to go to a

322
00:18:17.599 --> 00:18:20.759
<v Speaker 1>show and I said that would not be a good idea.

323
00:18:20.880 --> 00:18:23.759
<v Speaker 1>I chose not to do that. Question So he did

324
00:18:23.799 --> 00:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>invite you to a couple of social functions and you

325
00:18:26.279 --> 00:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>just rejected him. Answer? He did many things to try

326
00:18:29.519 --> 00:18:34.279
<v Speaker 1>to deepen the relationship, including various invitations. Question did you

327
00:18:34.319 --> 00:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>ever discuss sexual behavior of any kind with Jeffrey Epstein?

328
00:18:38.480 --> 00:18:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Answer no. Question. Did you ever witness Jeffrey Epstein engaging

329
00:18:42.839 --> 00:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in sexual contact of any kind? Answer no. Question Did

330
00:18:47.720 --> 00:18:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you ever witness Epstein receive a massage from a young

331
00:18:50.680 --> 00:18:55.359
<v Speaker 1>woman or a girl? Answer no. Question Whether often young

332
00:18:55.359 --> 00:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>women or girls at the places where you would meet

333
00:18:58.000 --> 00:19:01.920
<v Speaker 1>with Epstein? Answer no. The only time anyone who I'd

334
00:19:01.920 --> 00:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>call a girl was around after that first dinner, Eva

335
00:19:04.759 --> 00:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Dubin came and she had her daughter with her. Other

336
00:19:07.559 --> 00:19:10.759
<v Speaker 1>than that, there were no young women at any other

337
00:19:10.799 --> 00:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>times I saw with Epstein. Questions, So none of Epstein's employees,

338
00:19:14.920 --> 00:19:17.599
<v Speaker 1>we understand, were younger women. Did you ever meet any

339
00:19:17.640 --> 00:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of those people? Answer? I was not introduced to them,

340
00:19:21.559 --> 00:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>but you know, like when you go to the New

341
00:19:23.440 --> 00:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>York thing, I think they opened the door. Jeffrey Mister

342
00:19:27.200 --> 00:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Epstein had what appeared to be administrative assistants with them,

343
00:19:31.440 --> 00:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and the extent of my contact with them was that,

344
00:19:33.960 --> 00:19:36.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were there as I would go into

345
00:19:36.119 --> 00:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the meeting. They never attended any meeting that I was in.

346
00:19:39.599 --> 00:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>There were several occasions where mister Ebstein asked me to

347
00:19:42.440 --> 00:19:44.799
<v Speaker 1>be photographed with them at the end of the meeting.

348
00:19:45.279 --> 00:19:47.759
<v Speaker 1>I was not introduced to them as part of that.

349
00:19:47.759 --> 00:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>That was quite brief. One of the admins stayed when

350
00:19:51.039 --> 00:19:53.519
<v Speaker 1>David Blaine did one of his tricks, so she was

351
00:19:53.559 --> 00:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>standing around then. And there was also a time when

352
00:19:56.480 --> 00:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I took a flight from Newark to Palm Beach and

353
00:19:58.799 --> 00:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey had two admins assistance with them who sat in

354
00:20:01.720 --> 00:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the front cabin. But so I saw them as I

355
00:20:04.920 --> 00:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>walked onto the plane, and as I walked off the plane.

356
00:20:08.279 --> 00:20:10.279
<v Speaker 1>So to the other admins that were around, you know,

357
00:20:10.400 --> 00:20:12.599
<v Speaker 1>who appeared to be women, I believe they did not

358
00:20:12.680 --> 00:20:15.640
<v Speaker 1>look to be underage. I think I fully described any

359
00:20:15.640 --> 00:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>contact with women around Epstein. Question thank you, did you

360
00:20:20.519 --> 00:20:23.039
<v Speaker 1>ever engage in sexual contact of any kind in the

361
00:20:23.079 --> 00:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>presence of Jeffrey Epstein? Answer no, question. Did you ever

362
00:20:27.279 --> 00:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>engage in sexual contact with a person introduced to you

363
00:20:31.200 --> 00:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>by or affiliated with Jeffrey Epstein? Answer no question did

364
00:20:36.160 --> 00:20:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Epstein or any of his associates ever offer you

365
00:20:39.680 --> 00:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a young woman or a girl for the purpose of sex?

366
00:20:42.599 --> 00:20:46.599
<v Speaker 1>Answer no question. Did you ever receive a massage that

367
00:20:46.680 --> 00:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>was arranged by Jeffrey Epstein or any of his staff

368
00:20:49.400 --> 00:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>or associates, answer no question. We already discussed that you

369
00:20:53.519 --> 00:20:56.079
<v Speaker 1>were aware that he had been convicted of his sex crime.

370
00:20:56.319 --> 00:20:58.559
<v Speaker 1>But to be clear, at the time, were you aware

371
00:20:58.640 --> 00:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that he was a registered sex offender? Answer? I was not. Question.

372
00:21:03.759 --> 00:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you recall when you first learned that he was

373
00:21:05.720 --> 00:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a registered sex offender? Answer? You know it's really twenty eighteen,

374
00:21:10.000 --> 00:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>one of Miami newspapers described the sort of extensive and

375
00:21:12.960 --> 00:21:16.400
<v Speaker 1>horrific details of what he had done before his two

376
00:21:16.400 --> 00:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight two thousand and nine conviction. That I

377
00:21:19.000 --> 00:21:21.559
<v Speaker 1>became aware of the extent of his crimes, and I

378
00:21:21.640 --> 00:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>believe that's when I first knew that he actually registered

379
00:21:24.880 --> 00:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>as a sex offender. Question. And so you ended your

380
00:21:28.240 --> 00:21:31.759
<v Speaker 1>relationship with mister Epstein in late twenty fourteen, as you've

381
00:21:31.799 --> 00:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>mentioned today, and you just said that you learned he

382
00:21:34.200 --> 00:21:36.519
<v Speaker 1>was a sex offender and more of the extent of

383
00:21:36.519 --> 00:21:39.799
<v Speaker 1>his crimes in twenty eighteen. To be clear. Did you

384
00:21:39.839 --> 00:21:44.799
<v Speaker 1>have any interaction with mister Apstein after twenty fourteen? Answer

385
00:21:44.839 --> 00:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I did not. Question Did you have any communication with

386
00:21:47.759 --> 00:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>mister Epstein directly or through an intermediary during that time?

387
00:21:52.119 --> 00:21:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Answer yeah, right after twenty fourteen. There was an email

388
00:21:55.680 --> 00:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>sent to me. After twenty fourteen, he sent me quite

389
00:21:58.960 --> 00:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a bit of emails. The majority of emails that he

390
00:22:01.440 --> 00:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>sent to me actually were after I'd cut off all contact.

391
00:22:04.799 --> 00:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Most of those I did not read, but in the

392
00:22:07.519 --> 00:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>early period there was some that I did read. One

393
00:22:10.480 --> 00:22:13.759
<v Speaker 1>of those sought reimbursement for what he purported was expenses

394
00:22:13.960 --> 00:22:16.519
<v Speaker 1>that he paid with a woman who he became aware

395
00:22:16.799 --> 00:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of was a woman who I had an affair with,

396
00:22:19.799 --> 00:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and I communicated to my key person, top person at

397
00:22:22.400 --> 00:22:25.559
<v Speaker 1>Gates Ventures, Larry Cohen, that we were never going to

398
00:22:25.559 --> 00:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>pay anything. And so in that sense, I did have

399
00:22:28.440 --> 00:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>direct communication or indirect communication with them, and I think

400
00:22:32.039 --> 00:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that was in the months after I cut off direct contact. Question. Okay,

401
00:22:36.400 --> 00:22:38.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into that a little bit more later, but

402
00:22:38.599 --> 00:22:41.640
<v Speaker 1>just a few questions about that. So this person that

403
00:22:41.680 --> 00:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you had the affair with, is that Milla Antonova. Answer yes, question,

404
00:22:46.960 --> 00:22:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and you said you directed your staff not to reimburse

405
00:22:49.440 --> 00:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>mister Epstein for payments he was requesting. They were you said,

406
00:22:53.519 --> 00:22:57.839
<v Speaker 1>reimbursements for expenses he was covering for miss Antonova. Is

407
00:22:57.839 --> 00:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that right? Answer? That's what he represent ended. Question. Why

408
00:23:01.759 --> 00:23:04.279
<v Speaker 1>would he want you to reimburse him for that? Answer?

409
00:23:04.319 --> 00:23:06.559
<v Speaker 1>You know, I viewed it as a tactic to re

410
00:23:06.640 --> 00:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>engage with me. I'd never ask him to do anything

411
00:23:09.279 --> 00:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>with the respect to a person worth discussing. So I

412
00:23:12.039 --> 00:23:14.880
<v Speaker 1>was rather surprised. That was the first time I knew

413
00:23:14.920 --> 00:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>explicitly that he'd become aware of that affair. Question. So

414
00:23:18.759 --> 00:23:21.279
<v Speaker 1>you did not know until I'm sorry, this was in

415
00:23:21.279 --> 00:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen that we're discussing now. Answer, yeah, late twenty fourteen,

416
00:23:27.039 --> 00:23:31.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe early twenty fifteen, where he's seeking reimbursement. Question, So

417
00:23:31.759 --> 00:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you did not know until late twenty fourteen or early

418
00:23:34.720 --> 00:23:38.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen that Jeffrey Epstein was aware of any of

419
00:23:38.880 --> 00:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>your affairs or just this affair. Answer in the termination

420
00:23:43.240 --> 00:23:47.160
<v Speaker 1>or exit discussion relative to doctor Nikolch, which is as

421
00:23:47.200 --> 00:23:50.799
<v Speaker 1>early as I think spring of twenty thirteen, mister Epstein

422
00:23:50.839 --> 00:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>made some Beil references that made me wonder whether he

423
00:23:53.720 --> 00:23:56.039
<v Speaker 1>had become aware, which you know, the only way I

424
00:23:56.079 --> 00:23:59.319
<v Speaker 1>can imagine that would have been happening was through doctor

425
00:23:59.400 --> 00:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Nikolic of either one or two affairs that I'd had

426
00:24:02.960 --> 00:24:06.279
<v Speaker 1>that doctor Nikolitch was aware of, but until the specific

427
00:24:06.359 --> 00:24:09.319
<v Speaker 1>reimbursement requests, it was a veiled type of thing that

428
00:24:09.400 --> 00:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>he would say, you know, we should all want to

429
00:24:11.960 --> 00:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>remain friends. Question do you know what exactly the expenses

430
00:24:16.720 --> 00:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>he paid for for miss Antonova were? Answer? I have

431
00:24:20.519 --> 00:24:23.559
<v Speaker 1>no idea. You know, he wasn't an honest person, so

432
00:24:23.839 --> 00:24:26.640
<v Speaker 1>understanding did he pay those expenses or not? I have

433
00:24:26.720 --> 00:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>no knowledge. Question And we'll talk a little bit more

434
00:24:29.880 --> 00:24:32.079
<v Speaker 1>about that a little bit later, so we can go

435
00:24:32.119 --> 00:24:36.039
<v Speaker 1>ahead and move along. Mister Emmer, we've had another member join.

436
00:24:36.319 --> 00:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Can you please announce yourself for the record, James Walkinshaw,

437
00:24:39.759 --> 00:24:45.319
<v Speaker 1>eleven District, Virginia. Now mister spector asking questions. Thank you,

438
00:24:45.359 --> 00:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>mister Gates, and again we'll come back to some of

439
00:24:47.200 --> 00:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>those topics and my apologies. We're probably going to bounce

440
00:24:50.400 --> 00:24:52.880
<v Speaker 1>around a little bit. We're going to try to have

441
00:24:52.960 --> 00:24:56.279
<v Speaker 1>some sort of you know, semblance of chronology here. Emmer.

442
00:24:56.519 --> 00:24:59.400
<v Speaker 1>We've had another member joined, Can he please announce himself

443
00:24:59.400 --> 00:25:05.279
<v Speaker 1>for the record. Congressman Eric Burlison, Missouri. Question, so we've

444
00:25:05.319 --> 00:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>already begun talking about doctor Nikolch, but for the record,

445
00:25:08.559 --> 00:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>who is doctor Nikolich? Answered doctor Nikolich. He is a

446
00:25:12.240 --> 00:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>person who worked at the Gates Foundation on the diagnostic

447
00:25:15.200 --> 00:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>strategy for a period. Then he left the Gates Foundation

448
00:25:18.400 --> 00:25:20.799
<v Speaker 1>and came to work in my private office, which was

449
00:25:20.799 --> 00:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>called the BGC three. It's been renamed to Gates Ventures.

450
00:25:26.400 --> 00:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>It's the same private office. So he worked there. I

451
00:25:29.519 --> 00:25:32.880
<v Speaker 1>think his title was Science Advisor from something like twenty

452
00:25:32.960 --> 00:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>ten until one was his last day end of twenty thirteen. Yeah,

453
00:25:37.240 --> 00:25:41.079
<v Speaker 1>until the end of twenty thirteen. Question and just very briefly,

454
00:25:41.160 --> 00:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>because we're going to be discussing his employment dispute, but

455
00:25:44.559 --> 00:25:46.839
<v Speaker 1>why did he leave his employment at the end of

456
00:25:46.839 --> 00:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirteen? Just briefly, did you fire him? Did he resign?

457
00:25:50.759 --> 00:25:55.279
<v Speaker 1>What exactly occurred? Answer? Doctor Nikolch. When he worked for me,

458
00:25:55.680 --> 00:25:58.680
<v Speaker 1>had decided that he wanted to become a venture capitalist,

459
00:25:59.319 --> 00:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and so he said, hey, you know, working for you,

460
00:26:01.880 --> 00:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I can just make a salary. I understand about biotech companies,

461
00:26:05.519 --> 00:26:08.039
<v Speaker 1>which ones are going to be successful. I think both

462
00:26:08.079 --> 00:26:10.279
<v Speaker 1>in terms of impact and making money. That's where I

463
00:26:10.319 --> 00:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>should go, and so more than a year before he left,

464
00:26:13.480 --> 00:26:16.160
<v Speaker 1>we talked about that. I said, you know, why don't

465
00:26:16.200 --> 00:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you stay another year. You can make some up to

466
00:26:18.720 --> 00:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>three investments during the time you're with me, you know,

467
00:26:21.200 --> 00:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of practice venture capital type investment, and we'll share

468
00:26:24.680 --> 00:26:27.799
<v Speaker 1>the profit of those investments. So doctor Nikolch, you know,

469
00:26:28.079 --> 00:26:30.559
<v Speaker 1>had decided that he was moving on and was going

470
00:26:30.599 --> 00:26:34.119
<v Speaker 1>to venture capital. His actual exit was somewhat accelerated by

471
00:26:34.119 --> 00:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that I shared with my wife at the

472
00:26:36.240 --> 00:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>time that he was aware of the affairs that I had,

473
00:26:40.160 --> 00:26:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and she and I discussed that I should probably have

474
00:26:42.240 --> 00:26:45.039
<v Speaker 1>them leave sooner rather than later. So that was a

475
00:26:45.079 --> 00:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>factor in terms of the timing of his exit question. So,

476
00:26:49.000 --> 00:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>in summary, he was already kind of had, you know,

477
00:26:51.680 --> 00:26:54.440
<v Speaker 1>one foot out the door to some degree, but it

478
00:26:54.480 --> 00:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>was accelerated by the disclosure of your affairs to your

479
00:26:57.359 --> 00:27:00.759
<v Speaker 1>then wife, Melinda French Gates. Is that right answer? That's right?

480
00:27:01.480 --> 00:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know what would have happened if

481
00:27:03.960 --> 00:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't given him the opportunity to make the investments.

482
00:27:06.559 --> 00:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And he was sort of saying that he didn't want

483
00:27:08.480 --> 00:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to go and do that, and so I think I

484
00:27:10.240 --> 00:27:12.119
<v Speaker 1>extended the amount of time he stayed with me by

485
00:27:12.160 --> 00:27:15.759
<v Speaker 1>letting him make up to three investments. Question would you

486
00:27:15.799 --> 00:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>say doctor Nikolich was one of your closest advisors? Answer?

487
00:27:19.319 --> 00:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of advisers, but he as my

488
00:27:21.559 --> 00:27:25.759
<v Speaker 1>science advisor at Gates Venture. He was a valuable advisor

489
00:27:25.839 --> 00:27:29.279
<v Speaker 1>to me. Did you see him as purely professional? Was

490
00:27:29.319 --> 00:27:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it purely a professional relationship or was he a friend

491
00:27:32.200 --> 00:27:35.799
<v Speaker 1>of yours as well? Answer? That was a professional relationship.

492
00:27:37.240 --> 00:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean where you draw the line there. I was

493
00:27:39.920 --> 00:27:42.880
<v Speaker 1>friendly with doctor Nikeolch, but I didn't socialize with him.

494
00:27:42.920 --> 00:27:44.759
<v Speaker 1>He didn't come to my house. I didn't go to

495
00:27:44.759 --> 00:27:48.200
<v Speaker 1>his house. Question When was the last time you communicated

496
00:27:48.440 --> 00:27:52.599
<v Speaker 1>with doctor nikolic Answer? Many years ago? Question can you

497
00:27:52.599 --> 00:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>give me an estimate? Was it twenty fourteen when he

498
00:27:55.319 --> 00:27:58.519
<v Speaker 1>left employment or was it after that? Answer? There was

499
00:27:58.559 --> 00:28:00.880
<v Speaker 1>an MIT advisory committe for some of the work the

500
00:28:00.920 --> 00:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Foundation was doing with MIT, and he stayed on that

501
00:28:03.960 --> 00:28:07.279
<v Speaker 1>committee for I think a year after he left, and

502
00:28:07.319 --> 00:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>that was probably the last direct communication that I had

503
00:28:10.119 --> 00:28:13.119
<v Speaker 1>with him in those couple of years where he stayed

504
00:28:13.119 --> 00:28:17.119
<v Speaker 1>on the advisory committee and no communication since then. All right, folks,

505
00:28:17.160 --> 00:28:19.119
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna wrap up right here and in the next

506
00:28:19.160 --> 00:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>episode dealing with the topic, we're gonna pick up where

507
00:28:21.680 --> 00:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>we left off. All the information that goes with this

508
00:28:24.839 --> 00:28:28.839
<v Speaker 1>episode can be found in the description box. What's up, everyone,

509
00:28:28.880 --> 00:28:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. In

510
00:28:33.279 --> 00:28:35.400
<v Speaker 1>this episode, we're gonna pick up where we left off

511
00:28:35.599 --> 00:28:40.759
<v Speaker 1>with the Bill Gates transcript from his meeting with Congress. Question,

512
00:28:41.119 --> 00:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>we've already discussed mister Nickolic. Doctor Nikolic of course, introduced

513
00:28:45.400 --> 00:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you to mister Epstein. So in your words, can you

514
00:28:48.039 --> 00:28:52.359
<v Speaker 1>characterize doctor nikeolch relationship with mister Epstein, or at least

515
00:28:52.359 --> 00:28:56.039
<v Speaker 1>your understanding of their relationship? Answer? Well, during the time

516
00:28:56.079 --> 00:28:59.039
<v Speaker 1>I knew Epstein, I thought it was just he had

517
00:28:59.160 --> 00:29:02.279
<v Speaker 1>met him before I had, and he was kind of

518
00:29:02.359 --> 00:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>organizing the visits that took place. In Looking at the

519
00:29:05.200 --> 00:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>email documents that came out in January, to my surprise,

520
00:29:08.440 --> 00:29:11.559
<v Speaker 1>I now see that he had quite an extensive relationship

521
00:29:11.720 --> 00:29:14.519
<v Speaker 1>with mister Epstein. So I was not aware of all

522
00:29:14.559 --> 00:29:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of that during the time that I met with mister

523
00:29:16.960 --> 00:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Epstein in twenty eleven to twenty fourteen. Question, are you aware

524
00:29:22.000 --> 00:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that doctor Nikolch was ultimately named in one of mister

525
00:29:25.200 --> 00:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Epstein's final will and testaments. Answer, I've seen that in

526
00:29:29.000 --> 00:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the press. Question so you learned about that much later

527
00:29:32.799 --> 00:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in the press? Answer? I hope it's an accurate thing.

528
00:29:36.839 --> 00:29:39.799
<v Speaker 1>I was a press report that mentioned it. Question but

529
00:29:39.839 --> 00:29:43.039
<v Speaker 1>you have no first hand knowledge of that? Answer? No question.

530
00:29:43.359 --> 00:29:45.559
<v Speaker 1>Did that surprise you when you read it? Answer A

531
00:29:45.599 --> 00:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>lot question by mister spector. I'd like to enter into

532
00:29:50.440 --> 00:29:53.119
<v Speaker 1>the record majority Exhibit one, which is an email that

533
00:29:53.200 --> 00:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Epstein sent to doctor Nikolic on June sixteenth, twenty thirteen.

534
00:29:57.920 --> 00:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>The bates number on this document is E zero zero

535
00:30:01.839 --> 00:30:05.559
<v Speaker 1>eight seven three eight seven four, And just for the record,

536
00:30:05.839 --> 00:30:08.359
<v Speaker 1>all of the bates numbers that begin with the FTA

537
00:30:08.759 --> 00:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>are documents that the Department of Justice released pursuant to

538
00:30:12.279 --> 00:30:16.119
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein Files Transparency Act. I'll give you a second

539
00:30:16.119 --> 00:30:18.759
<v Speaker 1>to look at it, but I will note that I'll

540
00:30:18.759 --> 00:30:21.759
<v Speaker 1>be reading much of or all of it into the record,

541
00:30:21.920 --> 00:30:24.119
<v Speaker 1>so you don't need to read the entire thing. The

542
00:30:24.160 --> 00:30:28.759
<v Speaker 1>first question is have you seen these emails before? Answer? Yeah, okay,

543
00:30:28.960 --> 00:30:31.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean I may have seen these when they came

544
00:30:31.079 --> 00:30:34.359
<v Speaker 1>out in January, but not before that question, So you

545
00:30:34.359 --> 00:30:37.119
<v Speaker 1>don't recall ever seeing these emails prior to the Epstein

546
00:30:37.119 --> 00:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Files Transparency Act release by the DOJ answer, I did

547
00:30:40.960 --> 00:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>not question in the first email. So the email at

548
00:30:44.160 --> 00:30:46.839
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the page, that's an email from mister Epstein.

549
00:30:47.440 --> 00:30:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Context clues from the rest of the document indicate that

550
00:30:50.359 --> 00:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that was sent to Boris Nikolch, but of course that

551
00:30:53.799 --> 00:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is redacted on the document he sent to do Boris

552
00:30:57.240 --> 00:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday, June sixteenth, at twelve oo. It reads to

553
00:31:01.240 --> 00:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>me and then it looks like a draft of a

554
00:31:03.640 --> 00:31:06.519
<v Speaker 1>statement or an email that says Bill. I'm in tears

555
00:31:06.559 --> 00:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>as I write this. I have barely slept for three days.

556
00:31:09.720 --> 00:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm devastated, beyond words. I find myself losing my best

557
00:31:13.480 --> 00:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>friend in my career, all in one day, by no

558
00:31:16.319 --> 00:31:19.559
<v Speaker 1>fault on my own. As your friend, I suggest you

559
00:31:19.599 --> 00:31:24.559
<v Speaker 1>carefully reconsider your alternatives. If Melinda decides to file for divorce,

560
00:31:24.799 --> 00:31:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I will of course stand by you and help any

561
00:31:27.359 --> 00:31:30.839
<v Speaker 1>way I can. I want to see you happy. Truly

562
00:31:30.880 --> 00:31:34.359
<v Speaker 1>difficult choices no matter what. As you know, I'm going

563
00:31:34.720 --> 00:31:37.599
<v Speaker 1>in for delicate surgery on my eyes on Tuesday. This

564
00:31:37.759 --> 00:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>timing cannot be worse. I will totally be out of

565
00:31:40.680 --> 00:31:43.039
<v Speaker 1>it for a few days. I hope you're able to

566
00:31:43.079 --> 00:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>convince Melinda to allow me to continue doing my job,

567
00:31:46.240 --> 00:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a job you described as I could not have done better.

568
00:31:50.039 --> 00:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I hope to ask her face to face to change

569
00:31:52.279 --> 00:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>your mind. I have done nothing wrong. And the email continues,

570
00:31:56.160 --> 00:31:59.799
<v Speaker 1>but just for the record, there in twenty thirteen when

571
00:31:59.799 --> 00:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>this email was sent, were you and your wife Melinda

572
00:32:02.200 --> 00:32:07.079
<v Speaker 1>considering divorce? Answer no question. Why would mister Epstein or

573
00:32:07.160 --> 00:32:11.279
<v Speaker 1>doctor Nikolch be under the impression that you were? Answer well,

574
00:32:11.759 --> 00:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I never would have discussed anything relating to that subject

575
00:32:14.880 --> 00:32:19.039
<v Speaker 1>with mister Epstein. I told Boris doctor Nikolich, sorry that

576
00:32:19.200 --> 00:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I shared the information about the two affairs, and he

577
00:32:21.759 --> 00:32:24.079
<v Speaker 1>may have thought, you know, that meant our marriage was

578
00:32:24.119 --> 00:32:27.119
<v Speaker 1>at risk. It was certainly a deeply troubling thing for

579
00:32:27.240 --> 00:32:29.839
<v Speaker 1>my wife, But at this time there was not a

580
00:32:29.920 --> 00:32:34.359
<v Speaker 1>discussion of a divorce question. It seems in this draft

581
00:32:34.359 --> 00:32:37.559
<v Speaker 1>that's written from doctor Nikolich's perspective that he may have

582
00:32:37.599 --> 00:32:40.119
<v Speaker 1>believed that Melinda was the one who wanted him to

583
00:32:40.200 --> 00:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>leave the job. And I think you characterized it earlier

584
00:32:42.720 --> 00:32:44.839
<v Speaker 1>as kind of a back and forth discussion with your

585
00:32:44.880 --> 00:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>then wife. Was it Melinda's discussion? To ask doctor Nikolitch

586
00:32:50.200 --> 00:32:53.119
<v Speaker 1>to accelerate his departure or was it a mutual decision

587
00:32:53.279 --> 00:32:56.799
<v Speaker 1>between the two of you. Answer? It was a mutual decision.

588
00:32:57.200 --> 00:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I agreed with Melinda that having him leave pretty soon

589
00:33:00.480 --> 00:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>was the best thing, and so that's what I did,

590
00:33:03.359 --> 00:33:07.839
<v Speaker 1>and that was a quicker departure than would have happened otherwise. Question.

591
00:33:08.119 --> 00:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll continue reading the draft email it continues. However, I

592
00:33:11.559 --> 00:33:14.119
<v Speaker 1>recognize the fact that it might not be possible at

593
00:33:14.119 --> 00:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>this time. I also recognize that I will need a

594
00:33:17.200 --> 00:33:20.559
<v Speaker 1>lawyer to review any agreement we might enter into. But

595
00:33:20.720 --> 00:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't trust any with such sensitive information. I've asked

596
00:33:24.720 --> 00:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey to oversee and negotiate for me, and have given

597
00:33:27.960 --> 00:33:30.839
<v Speaker 1>him power of attorney to act on my behalf. He

598
00:33:30.880 --> 00:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>also needed to be my health proxy during my operation.

599
00:33:34.680 --> 00:33:37.599
<v Speaker 1>I have informed them of all the details surrounding our dilemma.

600
00:33:37.920 --> 00:33:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I trust them one hundred percent. My communication with him

601
00:33:41.759 --> 00:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is privileged. No worry. He's agreed to act as my

602
00:33:44.799 --> 00:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>financial and legal representative. You can trust him. He's dealt

603
00:33:49.000 --> 00:33:52.839
<v Speaker 1>with very similar problems in the past. Obviously, he hasn't

604
00:33:52.839 --> 00:33:56.119
<v Speaker 1>given me the details. I would greatly appreciate you and

605
00:33:56.160 --> 00:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>he talking directly. He does not know Larry and cannot

606
00:33:59.440 --> 00:34:02.839
<v Speaker 1>be open with him. He doesn't like or trust pr people.

607
00:34:03.559 --> 00:34:06.359
<v Speaker 1>This is a terrible circumstance in which we find ourselves.

608
00:34:06.559 --> 00:34:09.079
<v Speaker 1>But I'm confident of our friendship, and I know you

609
00:34:09.199 --> 00:34:12.320
<v Speaker 1>know how devoted I am to you, and I will

610
00:34:12.360 --> 00:34:15.360
<v Speaker 1>say I ask you if you've seen these emails before

611
00:34:15.400 --> 00:34:18.199
<v Speaker 1>the release, but I'll be more specific. Do you have

612
00:34:18.239 --> 00:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>any email or any other type of message that's similar

613
00:34:21.079 --> 00:34:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to that draft I just read to you? Did you

614
00:34:23.360 --> 00:34:27.320
<v Speaker 1>receive something like that in twenty thirteen? Answer? Never? Never

615
00:34:27.400 --> 00:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>anything close question. So doctor Nikolch and mister Epstein are

616
00:34:31.400 --> 00:34:34.360
<v Speaker 1>communicating about something that they might send to you, but

617
00:34:34.440 --> 00:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like they didn't. Is that right? Answer? I

618
00:34:37.480 --> 00:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>never received anything like that. Question. In the second email

619
00:34:41.480 --> 00:34:44.519
<v Speaker 1>in the middle that doctor Nikolch writes back to mister

620
00:34:44.559 --> 00:34:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Epstein at twelve twelve on June sixteenth, twenty thirteen, doctor

621
00:34:49.360 --> 00:34:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Nikolch seems to say, this is great. My only worry

622
00:34:52.880 --> 00:34:55.159
<v Speaker 1>is whether I should send him now or tell him

623
00:34:55.199 --> 00:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>when I see him on Monday. He's still trying to

624
00:34:57.519 --> 00:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>make it work with Melinda. He's having next round of

625
00:35:00.519 --> 00:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>negotiation with her next weekend. If all fails, then it's

626
00:35:04.000 --> 00:35:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a negotiation for a next step. If I send it

627
00:35:06.880 --> 00:35:11.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, it reads that I accepted. It's all over. Finally,

628
00:35:11.280 --> 00:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't put something such as divorce in an email.

629
00:35:14.440 --> 00:35:16.599
<v Speaker 1>If she reads, she'll go the extra step to be

630
00:35:16.639 --> 00:35:20.320
<v Speaker 1>as nasty as possible. Also, I think that my chances

631
00:35:20.360 --> 00:35:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of convincing him to talk to you or hire if

632
00:35:22.840 --> 00:35:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I do it in person and not over the email.

633
00:35:25.519 --> 00:35:28.320
<v Speaker 1>So how about hold this? So? How about you hold

634
00:35:28.320 --> 00:35:31.760
<v Speaker 1>this for eight days? Thank you? B It sounds like

635
00:35:31.800 --> 00:35:35.440
<v Speaker 1>mister Nikolich agrees with the perspective denoted in mister Epstein's

636
00:35:35.519 --> 00:35:38.360
<v Speaker 1>draft and that he would be more interested though, in

637
00:35:38.440 --> 00:35:41.840
<v Speaker 1>having the conversation with you face to face. Did he

638
00:35:41.920 --> 00:35:44.119
<v Speaker 1>have any sort of conversation with you face to face

639
00:35:44.440 --> 00:35:48.320
<v Speaker 1>during this time? Answer? But I've never seen this email,

640
00:35:48.360 --> 00:35:50.440
<v Speaker 1>so I mean you can ask me questions, but I

641
00:35:50.440 --> 00:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>add no value questions, so I guess I'll be more specific.

642
00:35:54.559 --> 00:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I understand you've testified that you've not seen the email.

643
00:35:57.280 --> 00:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Did doctor Nikolitch approach you and communicate these feelings in person,

644
00:36:01.320 --> 00:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>so not over email? Answer no question in the draft email? Again,

645
00:36:06.239 --> 00:36:08.840
<v Speaker 1>understanding that you have not seen it until much later,

646
00:36:09.400 --> 00:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Nikolitch is implying that he has entrusted Jeffrey Epstein

647
00:36:13.320 --> 00:36:17.679
<v Speaker 1>with sensitive information, seemingly with relation to you, and that

648
00:36:17.760 --> 00:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>he has given Epstein power of attorney to act on

649
00:36:20.000 --> 00:36:24.480
<v Speaker 1>his behalf, that he will be as financial and legal representative.

650
00:36:24.920 --> 00:36:27.159
<v Speaker 1>So were you aware that Jeffrey Epstein was going to

651
00:36:27.199 --> 00:36:32.800
<v Speaker 1>be acting as a legal or financial representative of doctor Nikolich? Answer? Welly,

652
00:36:32.840 --> 00:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't a lawyer, so I'm not sure how a

653
00:36:34.920 --> 00:36:39.159
<v Speaker 1>non lawyer becomes someone's legal representative. Eventually, doctor Nikolich did

654
00:36:39.159 --> 00:36:41.719
<v Speaker 1>communicate to me that he was involving Epstein in the

655
00:36:41.760 --> 00:36:46.119
<v Speaker 1>discussion of doctor Nikolich's exit. I forgot exactly, but he

656
00:36:46.159 --> 00:36:49.840
<v Speaker 1>sent he told me that he was involving Epstein. Question again,

657
00:36:50.000 --> 00:36:52.639
<v Speaker 1>you didn't receive this email, but it seems that they're

658
00:36:52.679 --> 00:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to get across to you. Is that, while you're

659
00:36:55.480 --> 00:36:57.880
<v Speaker 1>correct that Jeffrey Epstein was not in fact a lawyer,

660
00:36:58.480 --> 00:37:00.760
<v Speaker 1>they are representing him to have some sort of privileged

661
00:37:00.760 --> 00:37:04.400
<v Speaker 1>communication with doctor Nicolache, seemingly in a way that would

662
00:37:04.400 --> 00:37:08.400
<v Speaker 1>make it seem like sensitive information, the sensitive information that

663
00:37:08.440 --> 00:37:11.840
<v Speaker 1>mister Epstein knows about is privileged. Did you ever have

664
00:37:11.880 --> 00:37:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a conversation like that with doctor Nikolich. Answer no, how

665
00:37:16.320 --> 00:37:19.760
<v Speaker 1>could it be privileged? Question I'm just as confused as

666
00:37:19.800 --> 00:37:22.639
<v Speaker 1>you are. But I guess what I'm asking is, did

667
00:37:22.639 --> 00:37:25.840
<v Speaker 1>they represent to you that it could be privileged? Answer?

668
00:37:26.480 --> 00:37:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I told you that in terms of awareness of the

669
00:37:28.360 --> 00:37:31.400
<v Speaker 1>affairs that I had, there were no explicit reference to that,

670
00:37:31.760 --> 00:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>but there was some what you could call veiled reference

671
00:37:35.000 --> 00:37:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to it, in the form of, hey, we should all

672
00:37:37.360 --> 00:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>want to be friends. It's only later when Epstein is

673
00:37:40.280 --> 00:37:43.519
<v Speaker 1>talking about his reimbursements to a specific woman that I

674
00:37:43.599 --> 00:37:45.519
<v Speaker 1>was aware of that. I became fully aware of that.

675
00:37:46.599 --> 00:37:49.360
<v Speaker 1>There was a point in the discussions with Boris where

676
00:37:49.679 --> 00:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I said, I'm not going to be influenced

677
00:37:52.000 --> 00:37:54.360
<v Speaker 1>by what you might or might not know or say.

678
00:37:54.639 --> 00:37:58.199
<v Speaker 1>But again, this email is complete news to me. Question Okay,

679
00:37:58.400 --> 00:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the top of the email, I won't the entire one,

680
00:38:01.199 --> 00:38:03.599
<v Speaker 1>but it seems to imply that you had already given

681
00:38:03.639 --> 00:38:07.400
<v Speaker 1>doctor Nikolic some kind of offer, probably related to his departure.

682
00:38:07.760 --> 00:38:10.599
<v Speaker 1>Had you already given doctor Nickolch some kind of exit

683
00:38:10.639 --> 00:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>package or offer in June of twenty thirteen. Answer, yeah,

684
00:38:15.119 --> 00:38:17.599
<v Speaker 1>there was a prior agreement about He ended up making

685
00:38:17.679 --> 00:38:21.079
<v Speaker 1>two investments on our mutual behalf. You know, I'd authorize

686
00:38:21.119 --> 00:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>him to make three, but he made two, so there

687
00:38:23.519 --> 00:38:26.400
<v Speaker 1>was you know, putting into writing how we would handle

688
00:38:26.440 --> 00:38:28.880
<v Speaker 1>his payment for his share of those, and then just

689
00:38:28.920 --> 00:38:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the termination agreement. So that was all known before he

690
00:38:32.400 --> 00:38:38.559
<v Speaker 1>engaged Epstein in the exit discussions. Question. Okay, thank you.

691
00:38:38.760 --> 00:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I will now enter into the record majority exhibit two,

692
00:38:41.760 --> 00:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>which is an email from mister Epstein to himself on

693
00:38:44.440 --> 00:38:49.199
<v Speaker 1>July eighteenth, twenty thirteen. This is Mark Bates number EFTA

694
00:38:49.760 --> 00:38:53.320
<v Speaker 1>zero one nine sixty six nine eight eight. And they'll

695
00:38:53.360 --> 00:38:55.400
<v Speaker 1>note for the record that there are a few similar

696
00:38:55.480 --> 00:38:59.559
<v Speaker 1>versions of these emails throughout the files. I think with

697
00:38:59.679 --> 00:39:03.360
<v Speaker 1>things being forwarded along, I'll be referencing this version and

698
00:39:03.440 --> 00:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>asking you questions about it. Some of the other ones

699
00:39:06.079 --> 00:39:10.039
<v Speaker 1>are just cut off answer, I don't know what you

700
00:39:10.119 --> 00:39:14.639
<v Speaker 1>mean forward it along question. Within the Epstein files, there

701
00:39:14.639 --> 00:39:18.239
<v Speaker 1>are duplicates for various reasons, and I'm just referencing that.

702
00:39:18.320 --> 00:39:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm using this particular EFTA number for the record, and

703
00:39:22.840 --> 00:39:26.119
<v Speaker 1>while you're reviewing it, we've had more members and staff join.

704
00:39:26.599 --> 00:39:30.199
<v Speaker 1>Can they please identify themselves for the record, mister Garcia,

705
00:39:30.679 --> 00:39:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Robert Garcia, ranking member redacted. Representative Garcia, Congressman Raja Krishna

706
00:39:37.320 --> 00:39:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Morthy from Illinois. Question, mister Gates, have you seen this

707
00:39:42.599 --> 00:39:45.559
<v Speaker 1>email before? Answer? No, I mean I would have seen

708
00:39:45.599 --> 00:39:47.760
<v Speaker 1>it when it was released in January as part of

709
00:39:47.760 --> 00:39:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein files, but prior to that. No question. So

710
00:39:50.880 --> 00:39:53.519
<v Speaker 1>this appears to be a draft email or statement that

711
00:39:53.599 --> 00:39:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Epstein may have written he at least sent it to

712
00:39:55.920 --> 00:40:00.400
<v Speaker 1>himself from the perspective of doctor Nikolic. Is at fair answer?

713
00:40:00.719 --> 00:40:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I add no value to that question. Well, we can

714
00:40:04.000 --> 00:40:07.199
<v Speaker 1>agree that this is not the perspective of Jeffrey Epstein.

715
00:40:07.800 --> 00:40:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Is clearly written from the perspective of somebody else. Is

716
00:40:10.400 --> 00:40:13.559
<v Speaker 1>that fair answer? Are you asking me to speculate on

717
00:40:13.599 --> 00:40:17.039
<v Speaker 1>that question? So I'll read from the record. Then it

718
00:40:17.079 --> 00:40:21.440
<v Speaker 1>is again, sent Thursday, July eighteenth, twenty thirteen, at twelve

719
00:40:21.519 --> 00:40:25.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine from Jeffrey Epstein to himself. However, the email

720
00:40:25.880 --> 00:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>reads quote, I've decided to resign my position, effective immediately

721
00:40:29.639 --> 00:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>with BG three and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. I

722
00:40:33.519 --> 00:40:36.280
<v Speaker 1>have not come to this decision quickly or without great

723
00:40:36.280 --> 00:40:39.320
<v Speaker 1>deal of thought. During the past few weeks, I've been

724
00:40:39.320 --> 00:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>caught up in a severe marital dispute between Melinda and Bill.

725
00:40:43.239 --> 00:40:46.039
<v Speaker 1>I'll stop reading there for a second. But given majority

726
00:40:46.079 --> 00:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Exhibit one, which we were just discussing, and the fact

727
00:40:49.039 --> 00:40:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that mister Epstein and doctor Nikolch were clearly discussing a

728
00:40:52.440 --> 00:40:56.000
<v Speaker 1>marital dispute of some kind between you and Melinda, is

729
00:40:56.039 --> 00:40:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it fair to say that this email that was intended

730
00:40:59.360 --> 00:41:02.639
<v Speaker 1>to have been sent by doctor Nikolich. Answer? I don't know.

731
00:41:03.440 --> 00:41:05.920
<v Speaker 1>It was never sent by doctor Nicolich. That's all I

732
00:41:05.920 --> 00:41:09.559
<v Speaker 1>can bring to this question. Sure I can continue reading.

733
00:41:10.400 --> 00:41:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I have the greatest respect for my friend of seven years,

734
00:41:13.039 --> 00:41:15.199
<v Speaker 1>and I wish them both well. In my role as

735
00:41:15.239 --> 00:41:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the right hand, I've been asked on multiple occasions and

736
00:41:18.400 --> 00:41:22.320
<v Speaker 1>in hindsight wrongly acquiesced into participating in things that have

737
00:41:22.440 --> 00:41:26.679
<v Speaker 1>ranged from the morally inappropriate to the ethically unsound, and

738
00:41:26.760 --> 00:41:29.320
<v Speaker 1>had been repeatedly asked to do other things that get

739
00:41:29.360 --> 00:41:34.039
<v Speaker 1>nearer and potentially over the line into the illegal. Though

740
00:41:34.079 --> 00:41:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it was kindly suggested that I make a transition to

741
00:41:36.960 --> 00:41:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a new position after my six years of service, and

742
00:41:39.880 --> 00:41:42.199
<v Speaker 1>that Bill would, in his own words, give me a

743
00:41:42.199 --> 00:41:45.480
<v Speaker 1>generous package, I feel it would be dishonest to myself

744
00:41:45.719 --> 00:41:48.199
<v Speaker 1>and my future from helping Bill to get drugs in

745
00:41:48.280 --> 00:41:51.519
<v Speaker 1>order to deal with consequences of sex with Russian girls,

746
00:41:52.039 --> 00:41:56.159
<v Speaker 1>to facilitating his illicit trysts with married women, to being

747
00:41:56.159 --> 00:41:59.480
<v Speaker 1>asked to provide adderall for bridge tournaments. I feel I

748
00:41:59.519 --> 00:42:02.039
<v Speaker 1>owe it to my friends and future colleagues to admit

749
00:42:02.079 --> 00:42:04.639
<v Speaker 1>a moral failure, to ask forgiveness, and to move on

750
00:42:04.760 --> 00:42:10.800
<v Speaker 1>with life. So again, I understand you did not receive

751
00:42:10.800 --> 00:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>this email. So I'll just begin to discuss the facts

752
00:42:13.960 --> 00:42:16.760
<v Speaker 1>in that email. I've already asked you this. I asked

753
00:42:16.800 --> 00:42:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you if you had considered a divorce with Milinda in

754
00:42:19.360 --> 00:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirteen. I'll ask it a different way. Were you

755
00:42:23.039 --> 00:42:26.320
<v Speaker 1>having a marital dispute of some kind with your wife Melinda?

756
00:42:26.480 --> 00:42:30.400
<v Speaker 1>French Gates answer, Well, certainly, the fact that I told

757
00:42:30.480 --> 00:42:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Milinda during this timeframe about the two affairs that was

758
00:42:33.880 --> 00:42:36.719
<v Speaker 1>very distressing to her. But at the same time, there

759
00:42:36.760 --> 00:42:39.880
<v Speaker 1>was no explicit mention of getting divorced. It may have

760
00:42:39.880 --> 00:42:41.960
<v Speaker 1>occurred to Melinda at that point, but it was not

761
00:42:42.000 --> 00:42:45.519
<v Speaker 1>a subject to discussion. Question, But you were having a

762
00:42:45.559 --> 00:42:48.679
<v Speaker 1>marild dispute at the time, Is that fair answer? I

763
00:42:48.679 --> 00:42:51.679
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't call it a marital dispute. You could say that

764
00:42:51.719 --> 00:42:54.519
<v Speaker 1>it was a marital crisis because she became aware of

765
00:42:54.559 --> 00:42:58.880
<v Speaker 1>bad behavior on my part. Question sure was this dispute

766
00:42:59.159 --> 00:43:01.679
<v Speaker 1>that is reference in this email? Or how about this

767
00:43:02.239 --> 00:43:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the discussion you had with Melinda at the time about

768
00:43:04.719 --> 00:43:08.239
<v Speaker 1>your infidelity. Were those ultimately relevant to your divorce in

769
00:43:08.239 --> 00:43:11.639
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one? Answer you would have to ask her,

770
00:43:11.800 --> 00:43:15.480
<v Speaker 1>but I imagine that they were. Question how did doctor Nikolch

771
00:43:15.800 --> 00:43:19.440
<v Speaker 1>know of your marital of your dispute with Melinda? Answer?

772
00:43:19.480 --> 00:43:21.559
<v Speaker 1>I never discussed the topic with them. I did tell

773
00:43:21.639 --> 00:43:24.440
<v Speaker 1>him she was aware of the affairs and that I

774
00:43:24.559 --> 00:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>shared with her that there were also other affairs. Question

775
00:43:30.079 --> 00:43:33.000
<v Speaker 1>when did you tell Melinda about the affairs? Answer That

776
00:43:33.039 --> 00:43:36.119
<v Speaker 1>would have been in the spring of twenty thirteen. Question

777
00:43:36.199 --> 00:43:38.599
<v Speaker 1>and when did you tell doctor Nikolch that you told

778
00:43:38.679 --> 00:43:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Melinda about the affairs? Answer around the same time question

779
00:43:43.239 --> 00:43:46.199
<v Speaker 1>shortly thereafter? Answer right, and you know that was part

780
00:43:46.239 --> 00:43:48.599
<v Speaker 1>of my telling them that his employment was not going

781
00:43:48.639 --> 00:43:52.079
<v Speaker 1>to continue. Question So it's possible then that doctor Nickolitch,

782
00:43:52.159 --> 00:43:54.360
<v Speaker 1>while you didn't tell him that you were that you

783
00:43:54.400 --> 00:43:57.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't say you were considering a divorce, as you said

784
00:43:57.960 --> 00:44:01.079
<v Speaker 1>you weren't. But it's possible that doctor Nikolich read into

785
00:44:01.159 --> 00:44:03.639
<v Speaker 1>what you were telling him to believe that Melinda was

786
00:44:03.679 --> 00:44:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the reason he was being let go and that he

787
00:44:06.199 --> 00:44:09.800
<v Speaker 1>needed to fix things with you. Is that fair? Answer? Well,

788
00:44:09.800 --> 00:44:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not clear to me that doctor Nikolach ever saw

789
00:44:11.880 --> 00:44:15.039
<v Speaker 1>the emails. But you know, doctor Nikolich may have inferred

790
00:44:15.039 --> 00:44:17.000
<v Speaker 1>from the fact that I said that I, you know,

791
00:44:17.280 --> 00:44:20.840
<v Speaker 1>discuss the affairs, he may have speculated about what was

792
00:44:20.880 --> 00:44:24.920
<v Speaker 1>doing in terms of my marriage. Question. Do you have

793
00:44:24.960 --> 00:44:27.679
<v Speaker 1>any other suggestion of how Jeffrey Epstein would know about

794
00:44:27.719 --> 00:44:30.880
<v Speaker 1>your affairs or other details in this email except through

795
00:44:30.920 --> 00:44:34.440
<v Speaker 1>doctor Nikolich? Answer? I believe he found out about the

796
00:44:34.440 --> 00:44:38.320
<v Speaker 1>two affairs through doctor Nikolch. Mister Moran, And just to

797
00:44:38.320 --> 00:44:42.679
<v Speaker 1>be clear, you asked about other details Gates, Yeah, I'm

798
00:44:42.679 --> 00:44:45.639
<v Speaker 1>not commenting on that. All right, folks, we're gonna wrap

799
00:44:45.719 --> 00:44:48.400
<v Speaker 1>up right here, and in the next episode dealing with

800
00:44:48.440 --> 00:44:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the topic, we're gonna pick up where we left off.

801
00:44:51.000 --> 00:44:53.480
<v Speaker 1>All the information that goes with this episode can be

802
00:44:53.559 --> 00:44:55.480
<v Speaker 1>found in the description box.
