Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show. As the clock
Speaker 1: strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the fifth of January, year of
Speaker 1: Our Lord, twenty twenty six. Well, it's a new year
Speaker 1: and it's already a year of war and chaos. What
Speaker 1: do you think the consequences are going to be from
Speaker 1: the Venezuelan kidnapping and invasion? And I'm not talking about
Speaker 1: immediate consequences, but long term, and there will be consequences
Speaker 1: domestically and internationally. Where will Trump attack next? Will be Iran, Mexico, Canada,
Speaker 1: maybe Greenland? And what about this what aboutism that we
Speaker 1: see his apologists putting out there? Do you understand that
Speaker 1: is nothing other than the living constitution idea of the
Speaker 1: left being adopted by the right. It's all about being
Speaker 1: ruled by precedents instead of by written law. And then
Speaker 1: we're going to take a look at the calls from
Speaker 1: Israeli powerful people to end the First Amendment in the
Speaker 1: United States, as we're told to save it, we have
Speaker 1: to end it to save it. And we have fourth
Speaker 1: turning unrest that is accelerating even in Iran. So We're
Speaker 1: going to take a look at this and what did
Speaker 1: you notice about New Year's Eve this year? We saw
Speaker 1: something that was radically different in our family and in
Speaker 1: friends and family across the country. Well, I'm going to
Speaker 1: begin with an op ed piece that we just put
Speaker 1: up this morning on substact my opinions about this. I
Speaker 1: called it a long title, Trump's Venezuelan Oil Heist, the
Speaker 1: logical progression of the drug war from domestic theft to
Speaker 1: global predatory and piracy and the death of law. Really,
Speaker 1: you know, it's been a long time. It's been clear
Speaker 1: for a long time that Trump's cover story about Venezuela
Speaker 1: and fentanyl was a lie. Everybody knew it. Trump knew it.
Speaker 1: They would tell you out loud what they were really
Speaker 1: going to do, what they really wanted, regime change, the oil,
Speaker 1: all the rest of this stuff, and then they would
Speaker 1: come back to it periodically. Well, now they have come
Speaker 1: back to it again, to come back to this by
Speaker 1: pretending that it is a law enforcement operation. Even as
Speaker 1: the Trump administration spoke about regime change and getting the wall,
Speaker 1: they would pretty periodically return to the narrative of fentanyl
Speaker 1: tracking with such bold defiance to the Constitution as well
Speaker 1: as international law about the conduct even a declared war.
Speaker 1: Why return to the drug war narrative, Well, Americans have
Speaker 1: long been asleep over the true purpose of the drug war. Listen,
Speaker 1: it was never about ending the drug addiction of individual Americans.
Speaker 1: It was always about feeding the addiction to power of
Speaker 1: the US government. And to do that they had to
Speaker 1: sweep aside. The law is a perfect vehicle for that.
Speaker 1: And now we've seen this play out not just domestically
Speaker 1: but internationally, like Trump's phony declared emergencies to give themselves
Speaker 1: powers of a dictator. The drug war has been serving
Speaker 1: the same purpose for government and law enforcement in general
Speaker 1: for over fifty years now. So what's new is the
Speaker 1: aspect of military's quote unquote law enforcement and global civil
Speaker 1: asset forure taking up to the level of oil tankers
Speaker 1: with millions of barrels of oil on them. This is
Speaker 1: something that was created by the drug war. It's being
Speaker 1: taken to an international level. Gone is the usual CIA
Speaker 1: tactic of assassination. We have to pretend now that we're
Speaker 1: upholding some standard of law, as they violate every law
Speaker 1: and moral principle in this action. It's just like the
Speaker 1: Israeli guy who Shlomo is his first name. He said,
Speaker 1: we got to destroy the First Amendment in order to
Speaker 1: save it in America. Well, you try to do that
Speaker 1: and see what happens. That's one of the reasons why
Speaker 1: there's so much blowback against Israel. Confiscating cars, homes, businesses
Speaker 1: without finding anybody guilty, without even charging them with a crime,
Speaker 1: has now gone on to the international level. We skipped
Speaker 1: the due process of deliberations and declarations about war, and
Speaker 1: we just go straight for the spoils. Our government has
Speaker 1: been operating as thieves domestically for so long, they're now
Speaker 1: obviously extending the practice to piracy abroad. It's disheartening to
Speaker 1: see people abandon their former principles, and I'm talking about
Speaker 1: the grassroots people here and cheer the theft of oil.
Speaker 1: Commentators like the cobsc letter are so excited that we
Speaker 1: just took control of seventeen trillion dollars worth of oil,
Speaker 1: he wrote on Twitter. He said, in just twelve hours,
Speaker 1: the US has gained control of oil reserves worth more
Speaker 1: than the entire GDP of all countries in the world
Speaker 1: except for the US and China. That's four times larger
Speaker 1: than the GDP of Japan. Most people don't realize how
Speaker 1: much the world just changed. We'll have to ask all
Speaker 1: these people at he put that or whoever it is
Speaker 1: he or shere, whoever put that tweet out, and everybody
Speaker 1: started compying it, I mean copying it verbatim. Got a
Speaker 1: tremendous amount of play, and you had a lot of
Speaker 1: maga people, a lot of people who would call themselves conservatives,
Speaker 1: but they're not trying to conserve anything. They're not trying
Speaker 1: to conserve morality or the rule of law, any of
Speaker 1: that stuff. So just ask you who is going to
Speaker 1: profit from this valve? Who do you think We've already
Speaker 1: had a couple of dozen businessmen I'm want to talk
Speaker 1: about this have gone down to Venezuela to loot the country.
Speaker 1: These vulture capitalists will profit, but there won't be seventeen
Speaker 1: trillion dollars paid down on our thirty eight trillion dollar debt.
Speaker 1: And think about it. You know we had When Trump
Speaker 1: ran back in twenty sixteen and he was being interviewed,
Speaker 1: he said and asked about his opposition to regime change,
Speaker 1: and he was adamant we shouldn't be doing that. He said,
Speaker 1: come on, we've got a nineteen trillion dollar deficit here
Speaker 1: in the United States. We should be taking care of
Speaker 1: things here domestically instead of getting involved in these expensive
Speaker 1: wars abroad. Well, he and Biden have doubled that nineteen
Speaker 1: trillion dollar deficit. They don't care a debt. They don't
Speaker 1: care at all about the debt. And so, of course,
Speaker 1: as they point out, you know, seventeen trillion dollars of
Speaker 1: estimated well in the ground at today's market prices. That
Speaker 1: ignores the fact that you've got to extract that and
Speaker 1: do other things that are going to be expensive. But
Speaker 1: they said, oh, even taking half of that, you know,
Speaker 1: so we got eight and a half trillion dollars that
Speaker 1: we just took overnight. Isn't that great? We have an
Speaker 1: America that cheers that. We have conservatives who cheer them,
Speaker 1: and it's for partisan reasons. You know that they would
Speaker 1: not be cheering it if it was the Democrats doing it,
Speaker 1: they would oppose it. We have no principles. We only
Speaker 1: have political parties left. And so when Trump ran again,
Speaker 1: it was only nineteen trillion and five years of Trump
Speaker 1: and four years of Biden. They have doubled that. This
Speaker 1: is not going to go into some imaginary sovereign wealth fund.
Speaker 1: It will go to American oil companies. And guess what,
Speaker 1: the big businesses like that don't pay taxes. And we're
Speaker 1: going to talk about the taxes coming up. Marjorie Taylergreen
Speaker 1: wants people to go on a tax revolt. I think
Speaker 1: you should understand just how revolting this whole system is.
Speaker 1: And you should understand that they don't care if you
Speaker 1: don't pay the taxes. Oh, they'll throw you in jail, probably,
Speaker 1: but it really isn't going to put any kind of
Speaker 1: restrictions on them. The only thing that's going to restrict
Speaker 1: them is a loss of reserve currency status, which is
Speaker 1: happening because of these types of actions by Biden and
Speaker 1: by Trump, that will stop them. The income tax is
Speaker 1: not there to fund the government, Don't be stupid. The
Speaker 1: income tax is there to defund you, to keep you
Speaker 1: poor so that you don't threaten them. That's the purpose
Speaker 1: of the income tax, Charlie Brown. So it's not going
Speaker 1: to go into some imaginary sovereign wealth fund, and it's
Speaker 1: not even going to go to recouping the costs of
Speaker 1: this military operation. No, it's going to go into the
Speaker 1: pockets the people who are cronies and donors of Trump.
Speaker 1: It'll be a windfall profit for them, just like the
Speaker 1: windfall profit that Trump gave Pfizer and Moderna. We paid
Speaker 1: for their production of these bioweapons, and we handed that
Speaker 1: stuff to them, and they got to keep all of
Speaker 1: the profits because it was part of their bigger agenda.
Speaker 1: Same thing is going to happen with this. Expect to
Speaker 1: see a lot of billionaires made overnight out of this
Speaker 1: type of thing, just like we saw with Pfizer and Moderna.
Speaker 1: Trump gave them the bioweapon, he paid for it, he
Speaker 1: put it on the national credit card, while he bribed
Speaker 1: the hospitals to kill people with ventilators and call it
Speaker 1: a pandemic. And speaking of which, somebody made a perfectly
Speaker 1: time moving the financial markets just to take advantage of this,
Speaker 1: just like nine to eleven. Isn't that interesting? More shocking
Speaker 1: than Trump's action in Venezuela's reaction to this domestically, nothing
Speaker 1: shows the corruption and the moral bankruptcy of the USA
Speaker 1: more than the I voted for this crowd. They're cheering lies,
Speaker 1: they're cheering corruption, They're totally oblivious to the precedents being
Speaker 1: set even as they come back and say, well, so
Speaker 1: and so did it, so what about it? So now
Speaker 1: we can do it right? And then it realized how
Speaker 1: that is undermining the rule of law, of the Constitution,
Speaker 1: all the rest of this stuff, which again we know
Speaker 1: that they take an oath to it and immediately break that.
Speaker 1: So this is power that they don't realize. This is
Speaker 1: power that will be used. It will be used by
Speaker 1: people you don't like. It'll be used for purposes that
Speaker 1: you don't like, in policies that you don't like. Why
Speaker 1: are they cheering this? This is stupid as seeing the
Speaker 1: leftist cheering mom Danny when he says the era of
Speaker 1: big government is back, and they say, oh, I haven't
Speaker 1: felt this great since Obama. There's a kind of sado
Speaker 1: masochism about that, isn't it. It's like time me up
Speaker 1: and beat me with a government. I just love it
Speaker 1: when you do that and put a gag in my
Speaker 1: mouth too, like the cutting down on free speech. But
Speaker 1: the I Maga crowd is doing the same thing. It's
Speaker 1: not just the precedent for lawlessness and chaos at home.
Speaker 1: How can the Trump administration even protest China taking Taiwan
Speaker 1: after this Venezuelan precedent, he can't. He's put a stake
Speaker 1: through the heart of international law and ethics that says
Speaker 1: large companies must countries must not unilaterally take whatever they wish.
Speaker 1: The rule of law and borders have been erased. The
Speaker 1: new president is a prescription for war. It is for
Speaker 1: a full on melee to loot whatever you can take.
Speaker 1: When I look at this and I look at what
Speaker 1: Trump is doing, it looks to me like a riot
Speaker 1: in a city where people are setting things on fire
Speaker 1: and just grabbing everything they can get. The difference is
Speaker 1: that this is billionaires and corporations that are doing it,
Speaker 1: and Trump, of course is lighting the fire. The rule
Speaker 1: of law on borders have been erased. The new president
Speaker 1: is a prescription for war to take whatever you want.
Speaker 1: Isn't that the problem that we had with Hitler and
Speaker 1: Tojo World War two? And you know, there was more
Speaker 1: justification for Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor than for Trump's
Speaker 1: attack on Venezuela. We had been engaged in strangling sanctions,
Speaker 1: as joy Centi's pointed out many times when he comes on,
Speaker 1: he always likes to talk about that we had been
Speaker 1: engaged and sanctions that were strangling them, and Venezuela has
Speaker 1: done nothing to us nothing. All the guardrails, all the
Speaker 1: restrictions on unlimited power are being removed globally from free
Speaker 1: speech and due process and individual rights, and the idea
Speaker 1: that war should only be done as a last resort,
Speaker 1: only done defensively for peace, that there need to be
Speaker 1: some guardrails so we don't have total war. Are professing
Speaker 1: Christian war. Pete, Secretary of Defense is the one who's
Speaker 1: leading the charge on all that stuff. Now they're saying, well,
Speaker 1: the after round they found out. I gotta say, Pete, Hegseth,
Speaker 1: please cover up your tattoos and stop talking about your
Speaker 1: Christian beliefs. You are a reproach to everything that Christ stood,
Speaker 1: for everything that he taught. You have no reason to
Speaker 1: put that on your taking the name of Christ in vain.
Speaker 1: Well you know I've gone on this tie rade. Here.
Speaker 1: Let me play something for you though. That is a satire,
Speaker 1: because I think satires are maybe even more effective. Here's
Speaker 1: a guy who put up a video talking about how
Speaker 1: he's done regime change on his next door neighbor in
Speaker 1: his neighborhood in a.
Speaker 2: Stunning late night operation I had some friends of mine
Speaker 2: execute a raid on my neighbor Tom's house. He put
Speaker 2: up quite a fight, but we got through and he's
Speaker 2: in custody. I haven't liked what he's been doing over
Speaker 2: there for a while, so I've decided to run his
Speaker 2: house myself. He leaves his Christmas lights up too long,
Speaker 2: he never trims his avocado tree that hangs over my fence,
Speaker 2: and I believe he's running fentan al out of there.
Speaker 2: I can't prove the last one, but it makes sense.
Speaker 2: I've seen him speak Spanish. I got rid of the
Speaker 2: wife as well. I didn't really have a problem with her,
Speaker 2: but we did do a Fourth of July block party
Speaker 2: and she brought ampanadas, so better safe than sorry. I've
Speaker 2: got them at a residence in a couple towns over.
Speaker 2: I've been using his home as my own little man cave.
Speaker 2: Pretty great. Turns out he has a fantastic wine cellar
Speaker 2: that I have tapped into extensively. Anyway, I'll be running
Speaker 2: his home until a time when I can have a safe,
Speaker 2: proper and judicious turnover to some of the guy, which
Speaker 2: probably won't be happening soon and just ends up. I
Speaker 2: planned to take over some other neighbors' homes as well.
Speaker 2: Phil across the street has a pretty cool car I'd
Speaker 2: like to be in charge of. And Alex, who lives
Speaker 2: Caddy corner from me, has a wife who's a yoga instructor.
Speaker 1: Be taking that one.
Speaker 2: Soon again, doing it for the good of the neighborhood,
Speaker 2: so stay tuned.
Speaker 1: I thought that was smiling. I'm sorry. I don't know
Speaker 1: the name of that guy. I would love to give
Speaker 1: him credit. He deserves credit. That's excellent. The person who
Speaker 1: posted that up that I saw was not the same
Speaker 1: guy who did it, so I don't know who did that,
Speaker 1: but I do know who's doing this. You know, it
Speaker 1: was despicable over the weekend to see conservative outlets, news
Speaker 1: outlets cheering all of this stuff. It began with Breitbart.
Speaker 1: Look at this, they said, and it had pictures of
Speaker 1: more ships being blown up Operation Southern Spear. Isn't that great?
Speaker 1: This childish love of war that you see with mister
Speaker 1: lethality war Pete. Five Narco terrorists killed on New Year's Eve,
Speaker 1: three more on December thirtieth, isn't that great? And you
Speaker 1: knows this stuff rolled out. You saw the headlines. That's
Speaker 1: Breibart's headline before the invasion started. When the invasion started.
Speaker 1: This is from Info Wars. I'll read it to you,
Speaker 1: Saturday emergency broadcast. Powerfully executed. Blitzkrieg destroyed Venezuela's forces in minutes,
Speaker 1: clearing the way for Delta Force to capture the Venezuela
Speaker 1: and Dictator Maduro. You know, Alex, you wonder why they
Speaker 1: called Trump a Nazi. That's because you're selling who was
Speaker 1: it that invaded other countries because they felt like they
Speaker 1: had a need? Who was it that did blitzkrieg? You
Speaker 1: guys are owning yourselves. It makes me disgusted that I
Speaker 1: ever worked for that shill of an organization and that guy.
Speaker 1: When I see that type of thing, I would have
Speaker 1: never worked for a company that did that kind of trash.
Speaker 1: And that's what it is. It's trash. Alex, you should
Speaker 1: be ashamed of yourself for pushing wars. When I went
Speaker 1: to work for you, you were pushing against wars. You've done
Speaker 1: a complete You become a cheerleader for the military industrial Complex,
Speaker 1: you become a disinformation agent for the CIA. It's disgusting
Speaker 1: to see what you have become. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: I'll just put this here. I was going to play
Speaker 1: it later on, but I want to put this here.
Speaker 1: You know, what will you be remembered for? Somebody put
Speaker 1: up think about how you want to be remembered. It's
Speaker 1: very creepy. This is frozen stuff dead, Charlie Kirk, cobwebs,
Speaker 1: frozen dead, Laura Lomer, cobwebs for there's Alex same thing,
Speaker 1: cobwebs in the mouth. All the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 1: Is this how you want to be remembered. There's Elon
Speaker 1: Musk with this Nazi salute. Of course, the technocracy is
Speaker 1: not simply Nazi stuff. And here's Joe Rogan and Donald
Speaker 1: Trump covered with cobwebs, frozen dead, and Tucker Carlson, all
Speaker 1: these people. Ah, And there he is mister Prosperity Gospel himself,
Speaker 1: Copeland and Erica Kirk, Grifters taking the name of Christ
Speaker 1: in vain. And I don't know who these people are,
Speaker 1: but I guess the January the six Rioters. So yeah,
Speaker 1: I think about that. You know, we're just passing through
Speaker 1: this life. None of us have that much time left.
Speaker 1: A decade, two decades, three decades, whatever, that's not much
Speaker 1: time anyway. This is the kind of garbage these people
Speaker 1: cheering blitzkrieg war, cheering invasion. And it's also cool because
Speaker 1: look at our elite forces. You know, if you have
Speaker 1: that kind of power and you use it in an
Speaker 1: evil way, that's nothing to cheer about. I'm not cheering
Speaker 1: Delta Force with all this stuff. It's disgusting. I wish
Speaker 1: we didn't have that power. Quite frankly, it makes us
Speaker 1: all left less safe. So when you look at this,
Speaker 1: the US Southern Command, this is Breitbarton revealed on Wednesday,
Speaker 1: two different military operations against drug trafficking December thirtieth to
Speaker 1: thirty first. It's part of Operation Southern Spear, and we've
Speaker 1: got doctor Force out there and these people are all regurgitating.
Speaker 1: Oh look at the weapons they use. Look at how
Speaker 1: efficient this was, and all the rest of this stuff. Cheerleaders, cheerleaders,
Speaker 1: cheer the war, Trump and warpete I think maybe somebody
Speaker 1: in the future how to get rid of them without
Speaker 1: due process. Of course, that's all about it's now, why
Speaker 1: doesn't that happen, Not because they don't deserve it, but
Speaker 1: because they don't. People don't have the force, and we're
Speaker 1: now going to live in a world where there is
Speaker 1: no rule of force, no right or wrong. It's just
Speaker 1: rule by might. That's what these people represent, no principles
Speaker 1: whatsoever except I want it. I'm going to take it.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's what Trump is saying about Greenland. Right.
Speaker 1: So again, three narco terrorists a Bridebard again aboard the
Speaker 1: first vessel killed in the first engagement. The remaining Narco
Speaker 1: terrorists have been in the other two vessels, jumping overboard,
Speaker 1: distancing themselves before follow on engagements on their respective vessels.
Speaker 1: In other words, we just keep going until we kill everybody,
Speaker 1: no quarter given. We become Santa Ana. That's what we've become.
Speaker 1: It's disgusting. I may not be able to move to France,
Speaker 1: but to stop call myself an American after what America
Speaker 1: has become. It's just I'm disgusted with this, and I'm
Speaker 1: disgusted with the people who call themselves conservatives, who cheer
Speaker 1: this stuff. Operations announced by Southern Come over the past
Speaker 1: hours reportedly brings a total of known narco trafficking vessels
Speaker 1: struck in international waters through thirty five and the number
Speaker 1: of people killed to one hundred and fifteen. And they
Speaker 1: don't have a problem with that at all. They labeled
Speaker 1: these people narco terrasts. Let me tell you how the
Speaker 1: real narco terrists are the CIA. It's the deep state,
Speaker 1: the CIA that Trump is serving, that Biden is serving,
Speaker 1: that Alex Jones is serving, that bright Bart is serving.
Speaker 1: That's the narco terrorist organization out there, the deep state.
Speaker 1: They're cheerleading the deep state that wants perpetual war. That's
Speaker 1: what's really going on. So then they went from Operation
Speaker 1: Southern Spear to Operation Absolute Resolve. Grow up, Pete or else,
Speaker 1: go back to your house and play with ten soldiers
Speaker 1: on your desk. Trump telegraphed his plans for months, yet
Speaker 1: when it happened, Washington and Caracas were stunned. So, as
Speaker 1: a Wall Street journal I don't think at all we
Speaker 1: were stunned. I mean I was surprised that they didn't
Speaker 1: kill Maduro because that's really what the narco terrorists the
Speaker 1: CIA typically do when they overthrow a government. Why didn't
Speaker 1: they kill him? I mean, they even if this is
Speaker 1: supposedly some kind of a law enforcement action, they're just
Speaker 1: bragging about how they killed one hundred and fifteen people
Speaker 1: without any due process because they knew they were guilty.
Speaker 1: Just you know, from a distance you could tell it.
Speaker 1: So why didn't they kill Maduro? That's the real question.
Speaker 1: And perhaps it was because Trump wanted to parade him around.
Speaker 1: Put this picture out on a truth social and of
Speaker 1: course even stranger. Trump put him in a van in
Speaker 1: New York City and they drove around with the doors
Speaker 1: open to show everybody this is what it looks like.
Speaker 1: They literally did a parade. This is like a Roman Caesar.
Speaker 1: It goes out and conquers and overthrows other countries and
Speaker 1: then brings back the leaders and parades them around. This
Speaker 1: is the twenty first century, twenty first century equivalent of
Speaker 1: a Roman triumph parade. And of course, as this is
Speaker 1: all happening, Trump is building a massive monument to himself,
Speaker 1: like the Arc of the Triumph in France. Many people
Speaker 1: calling it the Arch of Trump, which is really what
Speaker 1: it is. So does that make you feel safe? Is
Speaker 1: that a win for Team America. It's pathetic, it's foolish.
Speaker 1: It is utterly ignorant about the precedents and the implications
Speaker 1: for the future. But of course this is also one
Speaker 1: aspect of this that James Carvill pointed out. Because James
Speaker 1: Carvel would know he was right there with Clinton when
Speaker 1: Clinton did his wag the dog or distract attention away
Speaker 1: from his sexual predations, even its ken Starr turned the
Speaker 1: spotlight away from the sexual predations and talked about a
Speaker 1: consensual relationship. He made it about Clinton being embarrassed to
Speaker 1: tell the truth about that and committing perjury under oath.
Speaker 1: It was a technicality. He completely can star completely overlooked
Speaker 1: the very credible allegations from Juanita Broderick and many others
Speaker 1: about sexual assault and rape, and Hillary Clinton called them
Speaker 1: bimbos and trailer trash. Remember that that's kind of the
Speaker 1: same type of thing that we're seeing now here, isn't it.
Speaker 1: It's kind of interesting. I'm sure it's just a coincidence.
Speaker 1: Don't you think that a key Epstein deadline arrived just
Speaker 1: as Trump got everybody to look at what was happening
Speaker 1: in Venezuela. I'm sure it's just a coincidence, like it
Speaker 1: was with Bill Clinton. James Carvill knows it's not a
Speaker 1: coincidence because he was probably orchestrating this type of stuff
Speaker 1: inside the Clinton administration. He kept saying, people don't camp
Speaker 1: about that, they don't care about they don't care about
Speaker 1: Monica Lewinsky. They're going to vote the pocketbooks, right, So, yeah,
Speaker 1: we just got to have good economy and they don't
Speaker 1: care about this kind of stuff. But of course we
Speaker 1: can distract them with the war. So Trump invaded a
Speaker 1: sovereign nation and kidnapped his leaders just as an inconvenient
Speaker 1: deadline was looming for the Justice Department to explain its
Speaker 1: controversial Epstein reactions. While the deadline came and went last month,
Speaker 1: the Trump administration has faced serious questions regarding its decisions
Speaker 1: about what to redact. And of course, as Rocanna and
Speaker 1: Thomas Massy appointing out, they said on Friday they would
Speaker 1: be bypassing. The Department of Justice demanded all files be
Speaker 1: made public by asking the Southern District Court of New
Speaker 1: York to appoint a special master to ensure that all
Speaker 1: the documents are released. They're also seeking to hold Pambondi
Speaker 1: in contempt of Congress, which would result in her being
Speaker 1: fined for every day that the Department of Justice fails
Speaker 1: to release the files in their entirety. They estimate that
Speaker 1: they won't finish reviewing the remaining files until at least
Speaker 1: January the twentieth. They wrote on social media, the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice. Did we have lawyers working around the clock
Speaker 1: to review and make the legally required redactions to protect Trump.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry victims. Yes, and we will release the documents
Speaker 1: as soon as possible. As a matter of fact, she
Speaker 1: said that they've got four hundred lawyers helping with it.
Speaker 1: You know what you get with four hundred lawyers eight
Speaker 1: hundred opinions at least, it's amazing that they could get
Speaker 1: anything done. But anyway, this is another aspect of what's
Speaker 1: going on, and it's important that we not forget the
Speaker 1: corruption of Trump because look, it's these intelligence agencies like
Speaker 1: the CIA, like them aside that're running the blackmail operations
Speaker 1: of Jeffrey Epstein to get what they want out of
Speaker 1: the politicians. I mean, they offer them both a carrot
Speaker 1: and a stick. You do what we want and we'll
Speaker 1: give you money. If you do what we don't want,
Speaker 1: you'll not only not get the money, but we'll show
Speaker 1: everybody these videos that we've got of you. That's the
Speaker 1: reality of how they get their way. It's no mystery.
Speaker 1: They don't want you to see that. So meanwhile, you've
Speaker 1: got twenty US investors they call them. That says business
Speaker 1: insider already planning a trip to Venezuela in March. The
Speaker 1: vulture capitalists. Yes, it is true, isn't it. The love
Speaker 1: of money is the root of all evil, and it
Speaker 1: is also the root of all wars as well. And
Speaker 1: when you go back and you look at the bankers, right,
Speaker 1: this has been around forever, going back to the Civil War,
Speaker 1: for example, it was commonly said rich Man's war, poor
Speaker 1: man's fight. Absolutely was true. Rockefeller paid his way out
Speaker 1: of that war, and he used it to begin to
Speaker 1: set up a monopoly on the refineries up in Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: which at the point in time was the only source
Speaker 1: of petroleum that anybody knew anything about. And they needed
Speaker 1: that because they had lost access to turpentine from the
Speaker 1: south because of the war. And so Smedley Butler knew that.
Speaker 1: You know, now it's oil. When he was around a
Speaker 1: century ago, it was about fruit companies, but now it's
Speaker 1: about oil. But it wasn't about fruit companies, it wasn't
Speaker 1: about well, it was about bankers and money. Ultimately, that's
Speaker 1: what it really is always about. So investors are a
Speaker 1: eyeing financial opportunities in Venezuela. How long before you have
Speaker 1: Jared and his friends go sniffing around. Jared Kushner and
Speaker 1: his friends. But this one guy, Charles Myers. It's quoted
Speaker 1: by Business Insider say. He's chairman of the political risk
Speaker 1: advisory firm Signum Global Advisors and former vice chairman of Evercore.
Speaker 1: He said, I think the centerpiece of Venezuela's success looking
Speaker 1: out twelve months or even twenty four months is foreign investment.
Speaker 1: And a big part of the Venezuelan story starting today
Speaker 1: is foreign investment, especially in oil. This guy's are real genius,
Speaker 1: isn't he. They're going to leverage their vast wealth to
Speaker 1: go in and take over everything, and it is a leverage.
Speaker 1: I mean, they're going to get thousands of times of
Speaker 1: their money back off of this stuff. But look, it
Speaker 1: really is about war for oil for money Americans.
Speaker 3: So we do not understand why we need to go
Speaker 3: in for three basic for three reasons you're in fox business.
Speaker 3: Venezuela for the American oil companies will be a field
Speaker 3: day because there will be more than a trillion dollars
Speaker 3: in economic activity. American companies can go in and fix
Speaker 3: all the oil pipe and the whole oil rigs and
Speaker 3: everything that has to do with the Venezuela and petroleum
Speaker 3: companies or anything that has to do with oil and
Speaker 3: the derivatives number.
Speaker 1: That's Maria Salas are out of Florida Congress one who
Speaker 1: is cheering this. It's great, trillion dollars. Look at all
Speaker 1: the money we get. We see this theme over and
Speaker 1: over again. It's okay because we're the strongest, and we
Speaker 1: just showed how strong we are, and we're going to
Speaker 1: be the wealthiest because we steal whatever we want. Again,
Speaker 1: I'm disgusted with America from the top to the bottom.
Speaker 1: Discussed with what I see. People are seeing this coming,
Speaker 1: especially very smart investors, and many of them actually bought
Speaker 1: bonds and anticipation of this, said Myers. Well again, play
Speaker 1: it like nine to eleven. So Madera is going to
Speaker 1: be indicted in the US after the capture and after
Speaker 1: Trump's fifty million dollar bounty on him. That's why he's
Speaker 1: in the Southern District of New York. The charges were
Speaker 1: filed there, and as one conservative influencer pointed out, said,
Speaker 1: when La La Harris pushed back against this and called
Speaker 1: it criminal, and she's right about that of all things,
Speaker 1: but she's only saying it because of partisan reasons. But
Speaker 1: he came back and said, you don't even know what
Speaker 1: happened in your own regime. Yes, she doesn't because it
Speaker 1: wasn't They weren't ruling it. She wasn't in charge. Biden
Speaker 1: wasn't in charge. Guess what, same people were in charge
Speaker 1: then that are in charge now and it really hasn't changed.
Speaker 1: He said, you put a bounty on his head as well,
Speaker 1: So you're saying that he was you wanted him arrested. Well,
Speaker 1: it's a big difference between putting a bounty on somebody's head,
Speaker 1: and there's a difference between invading another country and bombing
Speaker 1: civilians in order to do an extraction of an individual,
Speaker 1: rather than extradition when you can't get it from a
Speaker 1: head of state. So this is where all the maga
Speaker 1: of what about ism is so deadly to the rule
Speaker 1: of law. Well, okay, so Biden did it, so we
Speaker 1: can do it. No discussion about what the law says,
Speaker 1: no debate about whether the allegations are real or not,
Speaker 1: no due process about any of that. And I'm not
Speaker 1: taking Aduro's side. I'm not somebody I care anything about
Speaker 1: one way or the other. I'm just what I care
Speaker 1: about is due process. I care about us and our
Speaker 1: government coming a gang of thugs, not becoming the biggest
Speaker 1: mafia in history. Well, the Trump administration, as folks, is
Speaker 1: organized crime, is racketeering and corrupt organization. That's what it is.
Speaker 1: Trump's illegal actions are people are complacent about that. So again,
Speaker 1: she doesn't know what's going on. Biden didn't know what's
Speaker 1: going on. The country's being run by the deep state.
Speaker 1: And you've now got the conservatives cheering the deep state.
Speaker 1: You've got the news media outlets like breitbarton info wars
Speaker 1: cheering the deep state, cheering the deep states wars. They're
Speaker 1: not necessary. Venezuelan president is going to stand trial in
Speaker 1: the US. Is Trump captures the leader and his wife
Speaker 1: after explosions rock the capital. This is Daily Mail headline. So, yeah,
Speaker 1: we take the president and we do the due process. Later,
Speaker 1: we have the war, and we don't bother with due
Speaker 1: process at all about that. So this is done as
Speaker 1: law enforcement. We don't care about the law. Again, the
Speaker 1: tortured logic of this illegal war. Trump says that he
Speaker 1: warned Maduro to surrender. Hey, I told him to get out.
Speaker 1: He didn't listen to me, you know, You guys need
Speaker 1: to take my threats seriously because I'm a mafia leader. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't agree with John Stewart on politics,
Speaker 1: but he nailed this war thing better than anybody in
Speaker 1: MAGA did. But as well go, we're giving them full
Speaker 1: opportunity to do it the easy way, and when it
Speaker 1: doesn't work, we'll do it the hard way.
Speaker 2: If we could do things the easy way, that's fine.
Speaker 1: How do we have to do it the hard way?
Speaker 4: That's fine too.
Speaker 1: Chemical weapons as a threat to the United States. Sentinel
Speaker 1: poses a chemical weapons threat to the United States. Al
Speaker 1: Kata terrorists in Saudi Rock.
Speaker 3: Al Kaeda of our hemisphere.
Speaker 5: You can get rid of it on it could really
Speaker 5: begin to transform the region.
Speaker 6: There's an opportunity to transform the entire region.
Speaker 7: Bringing freedom and democracy.
Speaker 3: Democracy and freedom can serve as a beagon of ho.
Speaker 1: Boy. I tell you they can't even come up with
Speaker 1: any new lies. This is like a recycled Disney film,
Speaker 1: isn't it. And it's not Disney values there or the
Speaker 1: old Disney values. But again, power does not equal authority.
Speaker 1: Those are two very different things. And they sell tell
Speaker 1: you the same lies to sell the war over and
Speaker 1: over again. Whether it's Iran or rather it's a rock,
Speaker 1: or whether it's Venezuela, same thing. I told them. I
Speaker 1: warned them, you have to do what I say. I'm
Speaker 1: going to come in there and we have weapons of
Speaker 1: mass destructure. Remember that whole why And of course Trump,
Speaker 1: when you was running, told everybody said that was a lie.
Speaker 1: He was the first one of these candidates to come
Speaker 1: out and say we were lied into the Iraq war.
Speaker 1: Everybody knew it at that point in time, but he
Speaker 1: was the first one to say it. And then what
Speaker 1: does he do. He takes the woman who produced the
Speaker 1: lies using torture and then covered up the torture and
Speaker 1: sold those lies to administration in order in the public,
Speaker 1: in order to have the war. Gena Haspital. He put
Speaker 1: her in charge of the CIA his entire time. I mean,
Speaker 1: she's technically number two under Pompeo, but you know Pompeio
Speaker 1: is basically a figurehead. And then he promoted her in
Speaker 1: the second half of his administration to CIA head. He
Speaker 1: owned all that, he told us that she lied us
Speaker 1: into a war, and then he makes her the head
Speaker 1: of the CIA. Trump said that Maduro was in a
Speaker 1: house that was more like a fortress than a house.
Speaker 1: Does Trump live in a place that's more like a
Speaker 1: fortress in the house? I mean, what about mar Lago.
Speaker 1: You don't think that he's got a safe room in Marlago.
Speaker 1: I wonder how many safe rooms he's got in Marlago.
Speaker 1: What about the White House? Is it a fortress? This
Speaker 1: is what I said. This is absolutely amazing. You know
Speaker 1: that this shows that Maduro is a crook because he's
Speaker 1: living in a fortified house with guards and a steel door.
Speaker 1: Trump says it had steel doors, what they call a
Speaker 1: safety space, solid steel all around, and as if he
Speaker 1: doesn't have that orders of magnitude more. He was trying
Speaker 1: to get into the room, but he got bum rushed
Speaker 1: so fast that he didn't get into it. But he
Speaker 1: said it didn't matter if he did. The guys that
Speaker 1: were there had blow torches on them and special steel
Speaker 1: cutting equipment. They could have broken through the safe room.
Speaker 1: So it's just amazing, amazing thing, amazing job that these
Speaker 1: people did. Isn't that great? You know? Yeah, when you
Speaker 1: have that kind of force at your fingertips, you have
Speaker 1: to be held to a higher standard. So I'm just
Speaker 1: going to say the way this guy's going to war
Speaker 1: with everybody globally. Trump better make sure that he's got
Speaker 1: really good doors in that bunker that he's building that
Speaker 1: he calls the ballroom, is a ballroom bunker with all
Speaker 1: the wars that he's starting. He says he watched the
Speaker 1: whole thing from his home in mar Lago. He said
Speaker 1: it was like watching a TV show. Yeah, I know,
Speaker 1: I've seen the reruns over and over again. I've seen
Speaker 1: this movie before. Bondi said they will soon face the
Speaker 1: full wrath of American justice on American soil and American courts. Well,
Speaker 1: your day's coming to Bondy. You better hope that Trump's
Speaker 1: got a primptive pardon for you, and you better hope
Speaker 1: it sticks. The PSA for here's Vance saying, here's a
Speaker 1: PSA for everyone saying that this was illegal. Maduro had
Speaker 1: multiple indictments in the US for narco terrorism. Oh okay,
Speaker 1: so if you got an indictment against somebody and abstentia,
Speaker 1: then that's a green light to invade a country. That
Speaker 1: is the absurdity that's being sold by J. D. Vance.
Speaker 1: It's also the absurdity that's been brought into by Mike Lee,
Speaker 1: who likes to describe himself as somebody who follows the
Speaker 1: rule of law and the Constitution. He got into a
Speaker 1: lot of trouble for questioning Trump on this. He got
Speaker 1: ratioed on Twitter, and I'll talk about that in just
Speaker 1: a moment here. But anyway, this is the war on drugs,
Speaker 1: the logical progression, as I said at the beginning of
Speaker 1: this cancer that has called the War on drugs, that
Speaker 1: has metastasized throughout every police department in our country, and
Speaker 1: now it is moving to the international level. That's not
Speaker 1: a surprise because the War on drugs was not an
Speaker 1: invention of that despot Richard Nixon. Oh approgement does it?
Speaker 1: It's not illegal, right. It was created by the United
Speaker 1: Nations and they were the ones to cry the first
Speaker 1: and the loudest about the decriminalization of medical marijuana. It
Speaker 1: is a UN agenda, and the Republicans love this UN agenda.
Speaker 1: As I said before, it was never about individual addiction
Speaker 1: to drugs. It was about the government's addiction to power
Speaker 1: and how they had to remove the rule of law
Speaker 1: in order to be able to satisfy that addiction. So
Speaker 1: Warpete tweeting out he left around and found out, Yeah,
Speaker 1: good for you. Spoken like a thug that you are.
Speaker 1: Trump says, we will run Venezuela. Okay, well yeah, Trump
Speaker 1: has tried to run America as well. You know, he's
Speaker 1: taking over companies, and he's wants to run the companies.
Speaker 1: He's not just like this is a failing company. That's important.
Speaker 1: Here's some money, you guys, try to get this thing together.
Speaker 8: Now.
Speaker 1: He wants to actually run the country companies and run
Speaker 1: the country, and he wants to run the country into
Speaker 1: the ground. Quite frankly, it's what he's doing with his
Speaker 1: tariffs and his vacillation. Actually it's more like oscillation because
Speaker 1: it's on again, off again, on again, off again. After
Speaker 1: all of his failed central planning, after all of the
Speaker 1: failed nation building that we have done in various places
Speaker 1: that we've destroyed, he's now going to run Venezuela. Actually
Speaker 1: it's going to be Marco Rubio. Little Marco is going
Speaker 1: to run Venezuela. He may deliberately run it into the ground,
Speaker 1: just because he's got an axe, a chip on his
Speaker 1: shoulder and an axe to grind. He doesn't like Cuba.
Speaker 1: He's trying to run Cuba into the ground. His family
Speaker 1: migrated from Cuba, so he really has been aching to
Speaker 1: get back at Cuba for the longest time. Well, you know,
Speaker 1: Trump has bankrupt in half a dozen casinos. Maybe we'll
Speaker 1: see how many countries he can bankrupt, not just the US,
Speaker 1: but maybe he can also bankrupt in as well. We'll
Speaker 1: see again somebody who is the king of debt, the
Speaker 1: king of bankruptcy. Trump doesn't know anything about running anything.
Speaker 1: He's a lucky loser. As the book pointed out, he
Speaker 1: comes in with a big stash of cash and he
Speaker 1: doesn't know how to operate it now. But closing in.
Speaker 1: We'll close in in the next year or two on
Speaker 1: forty trillion dollars. Yeah, that's Trump. It was nineteen when
Speaker 1: he was running for president. No service members or military
Speaker 1: equipment will lost, isn't that great? Well, it is great.
Speaker 1: I'm glad to see that no Americans were killed. But
Speaker 1: they don't care if Venezuela and civilians are killed. That
Speaker 1: doesn't matter, right, not their calculation. That's one of the
Speaker 1: first issues that shows you how we have lost our
Speaker 1: moral compass. We're going to stay in Venezuela until such
Speaker 1: time as a proper transition can take place. We're going
Speaker 1: to do nation building and a little bit of nation
Speaker 1: looting as we go along. And right away he comes
Speaker 1: out and trashes the woman who was the leader of
Speaker 1: the opposition, the one who won the Nobel Prize for
Speaker 1: Peace over him. He trashes her, and he makes overtures
Speaker 1: to the vice president of Venezuela, who is a hardcore
Speaker 1: socialist and Zionist. And that was one of the things
Speaker 1: that was unforgivable for Maduro. He was anti Israel, he
Speaker 1: was pro Iran in terms of his rhetoric. He didn't
Speaker 1: really have much that he could do about it, but
Speaker 1: he had to be taken out. So Trump repeatd the
Speaker 1: claim that Venezuelan seized and stole American Well, you know,
Speaker 1: that was America's oil in the ground that was there. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right. Trump says, what happened to Maduro can happen
Speaker 1: to others in Venezuela. It can happen to other countries
Speaker 1: as well. That's why I call him precedent Trump. He
Speaker 1: says he's not afraid to deploy troops to Venezuela if needed. Well, finally,
Speaker 1: the Senate may have something to say about that. They're
Speaker 1: talking about stopping him from sending any more troops. But
Speaker 1: there's going to be a lot of troops that are
Speaker 1: going to be necessary to be sent to Venezuela. If
Speaker 1: you look at any at the past, it'd be a shame,
Speaker 1: he says. If anything were to happen to Venezuela, though,
Speaker 1: you just do what I say, right, just like a
Speaker 1: mafia boss. Nice country you got there, a lot of
Speaker 1: oil you got. It'd be a shame if anything were
Speaker 1: to happen to that. Yeah, well, you know, it wasn't
Speaker 1: that long ago that Tulsea Gabbard was only two months ago.
Speaker 1: She said this about regime change.
Speaker 9: The old Washington way of thinking is something we hope
Speaker 9: is in the rear view mirror and something that has
Speaker 9: held us back for too long. For decades, our foreign
Speaker 9: policy has been trapped in a counterproductive and endless cycle
Speaker 9: of regime change or nation building. It was a one
Speaker 9: size fits all approach of toppling regimes, trying to impose
Speaker 9: our system of governance on others, intervene in conflicts that
Speaker 9: were barely understood, and walk away with more enemies than allies.
Speaker 9: The results trillions spent, countless lives lost, and in many cases,
Speaker 9: a creation of greater security threats. The rise of islamusts
Speaker 9: terrorist groups like ISIS. President Trump was elected by the
Speaker 9: American people to put an end to this. From day one,
Speaker 9: he has showed a very different way to conduct foreign.
Speaker 1: Policy that didn't age too well. And that was only
Speaker 1: two months ago. And of course Telta Gabbard when she
Speaker 1: was running for president, was that back in twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: She was saying the same things. She hasn't changed in
Speaker 1: what she's saying, but she is completely out of step
Speaker 1: with the new Donald Trump, and the new Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is completely out of step with Candidate Trump as well.
Speaker 4: I remember this in the country until such time as
Speaker 4: we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition. Our
Speaker 4: current strategy of nation building and regime change is a
Speaker 4: proven absolute failure.
Speaker 1: We will bring disciple.
Speaker 5: We must abandon the failed policy of nation building and
Speaker 5: regime change that Hillary Clinton pushed in Iraq, in Libya,
Speaker 5: in Egypt, and in Syria. Regime change takes chaos.
Speaker 4: You've seen how that works over the last twenty years.
Speaker 2: That hasn't been too good.
Speaker 5: Not a reckless introversitist lobialism.
Speaker 4: We're getting out of the nation building business. We're going
Speaker 4: to stay until such time as the proper transition can
Speaker 4: take place.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that was then this is now right, that's one
Speaker 1: of the reasons why a lot of MAGA people are
Speaker 1: feeling betrayed. Yet again, how many times does it take
Speaker 1: before you people get out of your stupor. And then
Speaker 1: we've got christineom talking about the fact that we're going
Speaker 1: to now bring in Venezuelan immigrants refugees, and of course
Speaker 1: this is one of the things people have said from
Speaker 1: the very beginning, as they said, if Trump goes into Venezuela,
Speaker 1: we're going to be flooded with Venezuelan immigrants. And now Christineome,
Speaker 1: head of ICE, is actually ICE's department underneath her, but
Speaker 1: now she's cheering this.
Speaker 10: Aezuela today is more free than it was yesterday, and
Speaker 10: it's going to continue to be that way as long
Speaker 10: as President Trump is in the White House and is
Speaker 10: making sure that he's protecting the interests of the American people,
Speaker 10: because that ripple effect will continue to bring that kind
Speaker 10: of liberty to Venezuela as well. These programs, we're bringing
Speaker 10: integrity back to them. The decisions are made in conjunction
Speaker 10: with the State Department, with the White House, and then
Speaker 10: we at the Homeland Security, implement them and make sure
Speaker 10: that they are followed through. So every individual that was
Speaker 10: under TPS has the opportunity to apply for refugee status
Speaker 10: and that evaluation will forward. But we need to make
Speaker 10: sure that our programs actually mean something and that we're
Speaker 10: following the law. And that's how that decision with TPS
Speaker 10: was made.
Speaker 1: Yeah, under Biden, they gave them a temporary protected status,
Speaker 1: I think is what TPS did for essentially what it was,
Speaker 1: if that's not exactly the words that they used. He
Speaker 1: wanted to have more people from Venezuela, and Maduro was
Speaker 1: opening up his prisons just like Castro had done when
Speaker 1: I was living in Florida as a young man, sending
Speaker 1: in criminals into Florida from Cuba. And so it's not
Speaker 1: just blood, it's not just treasure. It's also immigration. And
Speaker 1: that's what we get out of all this, Right, we
Speaker 1: get a flood of Venezuelan immigrants just get a pass
Speaker 1: to come in, just like under Biden. Isn't that interesting?
Speaker 1: So but the thing that we have to focus on,
Speaker 1: as Trump is saying, just focus on the fact this
Speaker 1: is one of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays
Speaker 1: of the American military. Yeah, think of it as a
Speaker 1: fireworks display. So it was a culmination of months of
Speaker 1: planning and rehearsal, an operation of frankly, only the military
Speaker 1: could have undertaken, said the Chair of the Joint chiefs
Speaker 1: of Staff, General Kin. It's something that they have now
Speaker 1: unleashed as a new Pandora's box of chaos, and they're
Speaker 1: going to reap the whirlwind with China and just watch
Speaker 1: and see what happens with this. So as all this
Speaker 1: is happening, or Pete says, well, they left around and
Speaker 1: found out, and Trump says, these other people down there
Speaker 1: in Latin America they need to watch their ass. That's
Speaker 1: what he had to say. These guys are crude thugs,
Speaker 1: they're mafia, they're rico kind of guys. Finally, the secondary state,
Speaker 1: Marco Rubio appeared to directly threaten the leaders of Cuba.
Speaker 1: If I were in power in Cuba, I'd be very worried.
Speaker 1: Right now, He's not very worried about being in power
Speaker 1: in Venezuela. As many people pointing, it's going to be
Speaker 1: the Viceroy of Venezuela. Kind of alliteration that you know,
Speaker 1: at least it sounds impressive. Whether it is or not,
Speaker 1: it just means he's going to govern it. You think
Speaker 1: he's up to the task. He's already got a lot
Speaker 1: of different hats that he's wearing. He's already a Secretary
Speaker 1: of State and other powers that we haven't seen since
Speaker 1: Richard Nixon gave that kind of authority to Henry Kissinger.
Speaker 1: So now he gets to rule Venezuela as well. And
Speaker 1: again you keep hearing this rhetoric. Just as John Stewart
Speaker 1: point out, he didn't put this one in. They love
Speaker 1: to talk about shock and awe. Shock and awe, that's
Speaker 1: what it's all really about, right, just recycled sound bites
Speaker 1: and hey, you know we've got the power, we should
Speaker 1: use it to steal. Jonathan Turley said this operation will
Speaker 1: be justified as executing a criminal warrant and responding to
Speaker 1: an international drug cartel, very similar legal framework to the
Speaker 1: one used against Noriega in nineteen eighty nine. There is
Speaker 1: precedent for supporting this, he says, well, you know what
Speaker 1: George H. W. Bush did when he went after Noriega
Speaker 1: was criminal, and the Panama invasion was criminal. There was
Speaker 1: an excellent documentary about that. It was narrated by Elizabeth Montgomery.
Speaker 1: I remember we had it in our video store and
Speaker 1: I pushed it everybody could You should go back and
Speaker 1: take a look at that precedent that was there, and
Speaker 1: you should understand that strongman Noriega, that's what George H. W.
Speaker 1: Bush always called him, strong man, strongman that and wouldn't
Speaker 1: call him the president. They have to pretend that this
Speaker 1: person is not the legitimate leader of the country. And
Speaker 1: that's the same pretense that you see from Marco Rubio now.
Speaker 1: And the reality is is that Noriega was running drugs
Speaker 1: with the CIA, with the biggest narco terrorist gang in
Speaker 1: the world, the CIA, until he decided that he was
Speaker 1: big enough that he would break off from them and
Speaker 1: go his own way. That's why he had to be
Speaker 1: taken out. It was illegal, But who cares. We now
Speaker 1: have a precedent, and I'm surprised that Jonathan Turley, a lawyer,
Speaker 1: can't see this, As I said at the top of
Speaker 1: the hour, when you look at what all this precedent
Speaker 1: stuff is and all this well what about this? You know, look,
Speaker 1: Biden did this or George H. W. Bush did it.
Speaker 1: There's never any question about whether or not it was
Speaker 1: illegal when they got away with it. You know, it's
Speaker 1: just like, well, wait, he stole that, I can steal
Speaker 1: it too if I don't. You know, if I don't
Speaker 1: steal it, somebody else will. But somebody else's are stolen
Speaker 1: some stuff like that, So now I get to do
Speaker 1: it without any penalty. When you start governing by precedents
Speaker 1: and by emergencies and executive orders and all the rest
Speaker 1: of this stuff, that is a dictatorship, folks. That gets
Speaker 1: us away from the rule of law. And so if
Speaker 1: you're going to say, well, we're we can do this
Speaker 1: even though it's against the law. We can do it
Speaker 1: because we had a former Republican president who did it,
Speaker 1: or we have a Democrat president who did it. That
Speaker 1: is the path to ruin to lawlessness. Venezuela is our
Speaker 1: freedom has arrived, said Maria Karina Machado in a post,
Speaker 1: and we are ready for the reconstruction of our nation.
Speaker 1: Except that she was immediately dissed by Trump. And I
Speaker 1: do think that I wasn't the only one to say,
Speaker 1: and I saw somebody else say it after I said
Speaker 1: it first. I had not seen what they said, but
Speaker 1: they came the same conclusion. Independently. So I'm saying that
Speaker 1: part of this is Trump's being a sore loser about
Speaker 1: the Nobel Prize. He's not going to put the lady
Speaker 1: that he lost the Nobel Prize to in charge of
Speaker 1: Venezuela when he wanted it. So again, they put this
Speaker 1: guy on board the ew Rejima Maduro and they take
Speaker 1: his picture handcuffs and blindfolds. You know, I look at
Speaker 1: that and I think, you know, Americans and my parents
Speaker 1: generation fought and died for liberty for America. So this
Speaker 1: mafia don Trump can rule like a cartel warlord. I'm
Speaker 1: absolutely disgusted with this country, with this government, with this military,
Speaker 1: and the people who make excuses for it. Critics say
Speaker 1: the operation goes against Trump's campaign promise to end forever
Speaker 1: wars and regime change policies, as this article on zero
Speaker 1: Hedge says, Libertarians will probably be furious. Yeah, yeah, anybody
Speaker 1: who cares about the rule of law and liberty should
Speaker 1: be furious. And yet pretty much crickets out there, however,
Speaker 1: says Zero Edge. From Trump's perspective, doing a hostile communist
Speaker 1: regime that is a key ally of China and Russia
Speaker 1: in the Western hemisphere fits directly into the administration's America
Speaker 1: First policy, not at all. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: he doesn't want the woman who beat him for the
Speaker 1: Nobel Peace Prize that he wanted. Instead, what he's doing
Speaker 1: is he's taking this really hardcore communist who is the
Speaker 1: vice president and putting her in charge. All these people
Speaker 1: in MAGA who are saying, well, I had to get
Speaker 1: rid of these people because they're communists. They really don't
Speaker 1: know what they're talking about. Anybody who cares about the
Speaker 1: rule of law, not just libertarians, but if you care
Speaker 1: for liberty and peace especially, you should be furious. But
Speaker 1: that's not what Breitbart Info wars are apparently WorldNetDaily, any
Speaker 1: of these Trump cheerleaders of war, maybe not even zero Hedge.
Speaker 1: That's not really what they care about. They just want
Speaker 1: central planning and they don't mind the corruption that comes
Speaker 1: with it. So it appeared that I Forever wore is
Speaker 1: not in the cards with Maduro in custody, You don't
Speaker 1: think so, you know what America has been very good at.
Speaker 1: And I remember when the Iraq War was being debated.
Speaker 1: I remember the phrase very clearly from National Review. They
Speaker 1: said at the time, the US can and should reduce
Speaker 1: the Iraqi military to twisted metal. I think that was
Speaker 1: during the first Gulf War because I think it was
Speaker 1: William F. Buckley, and I don't know if he was
Speaker 1: alive at the second one or not, but that really
Speaker 1: stuck with me, especially as we watched this thing unfold. Yes,
Speaker 1: the US military is very good at reducing other militaries
Speaker 1: to twisted metal. What they're really poor at is occupying
Speaker 1: the country. What they're really poor at is building and
Speaker 1: looting the other countries. So they're really poor at its
Speaker 1: asymmetric warfare. We have failed in that repeatedly, and so
Speaker 1: we love to brag about our complex weapon systems that
Speaker 1: can take out their weapon systems, but over and over
Speaker 1: again we see that as a pyrrhic victory. Venezuela is
Speaker 1: not the only country south of the border that protects
Speaker 1: the activities of drug cartels, said Trump. So now you
Speaker 1: know we can put some other ones on the list.
Speaker 1: Is this starting to sound like what Wesley Clark said
Speaker 1: about the Middle East? You know, we got a list
Speaker 1: of seven different countries and they're just going down the list.
Speaker 1: This is a prescription, folks, for endless war. One after
Speaker 1: the other. I think twenty twenty six is going to
Speaker 1: be a year of war, and I would not be
Speaker 1: surprised to see China. They're going through a lot of drills,
Speaker 1: a lot of build up for innovasion of Taiwan, and
Speaker 1: I would not be surprised at all to see them
Speaker 1: do that. So again, the question is a zero heade writs.
Speaker 1: Venezuela is not the only country south of the border
Speaker 1: that protects the activities of drug cartels. Are you going
Speaker 1: to still try to sell that lie that this is
Speaker 1: about drugs? Come on, stop circling back to that lie,
Speaker 1: zero hedge. You should be better than this. I know
Speaker 1: they have a lot of different people write articles and
Speaker 1: say you get a lot of different angles from it,
Speaker 1: but some of them are really stupid and dishonest. The
Speaker 1: Democrats will seize on every opportunity to label Trump as
Speaker 1: a warmonger. Well, yeah, because he is. You know, it
Speaker 1: is a partisan thing. They would not call their own
Speaker 1: people warmongers. But they will tell you the truth about Trump.
Speaker 1: And I've said this about the form press as well.
Speaker 1: You know, I like to read art because RT will
Speaker 1: tell you the truth about America, but they'll lie about
Speaker 1: Russia and the US press will lie about America, but
Speaker 1: they'll tell you the truth about Russia, and vice versa. Well,
Speaker 1: the same thing is true of the two political parties.
Speaker 1: Many conservatives are taking a f Venezuela approach and argue
Speaker 1: that it is high time something was done about an abusive,
Speaker 1: corrupt communist enclave in America's backyard. What Trump is doing
Speaker 1: is putting one of these abusive corrupt communists and party
Speaker 1: in power. Right, and you just do what I tell
Speaker 1: you to do. You better do it. So. Pete Heegsas
Speaker 1: says that the US intervention in Venezuela is the exact
Speaker 1: opposite of Iraq. Maybe what he means is that instead
Speaker 1: of nation building, we're going to be involved in nation looting.
Speaker 1: That would be the exact opposite. We spent decades and
Speaker 1: decades and purchased in blood and got nothing economically in return.
Speaker 1: Trump is now going to flip the script, says he say,
Speaker 1: So now we're going to go in, We're I take
Speaker 1: the oil, We're going to loot the country. Is that
Speaker 1: any better? And who gets that money? As I said before,
Speaker 1: it's not going to be even used to pay down
Speaker 1: the debt. It's not going to be used to pay
Speaker 1: for the missiles and the bombs. And that's not even
Speaker 1: calculating lives that are lost on both sides. Who gets
Speaker 1: this money? Who gets this money? Well, as I point
Speaker 1: out Maria Salazar, so the old company is going to
Speaker 1: make trillions of dollars off of this stuff. That's right.
Speaker 1: It'll be money for the big oil, would be money
Speaker 1: for big pharma. And you and I get the credit
Speaker 1: card bill, the national debt if we don't get killed.
Speaker 1: Hexcess said that through strategic action, the US can ensure
Speaker 1: that has access to additional wealth and resources, enabling a
Speaker 1: country to unleash that without having to spend American blood. Yeah,
Speaker 1: warpeak goes full pirate, full theft. And again the love
Speaker 1: of money, the love of the wealth that is in
Speaker 1: Venezuela that these communists can't extract. Why because they are
Speaker 1: trying to do central planning. But of course Trump's not
Speaker 1: going to learning lessons about failures of central planning. Instead,
Speaker 1: they're going to cover it up by going down and
Speaker 1: just stealing stuff from other people. Except it's not going
Speaker 1: to be stolen to pay down the debt. It'll be
Speaker 1: given to the oil companies. So Hegsas says the Hemisphere
Speaker 1: will benefit from Trump's bold action. Let me tell you
Speaker 1: what I think is a likely scenario to happen. Now,
Speaker 1: we're not going to see the Venezuelan military sale into Manhattan,
Speaker 1: you know, like the mouse that re warded ers that
Speaker 1: we're not going to see that. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: when we look at the way these wars are going
Speaker 1: to fold, here's my opinion, here's what I see happening
Speaker 1: with it. I don't think that if things get really
Speaker 1: bad and Russia wants to attack US or China wants
Speaker 1: to attack US. I mean, there could be a direct
Speaker 1: confrontation over Taiwan if we're stupid enough. But the way
Speaker 1: it's really going to unfold is going to be done
Speaker 1: in a way that gives them plausible deniability. Russia and
Speaker 1: China even do not want to directly confront the United
Speaker 1: States with launching a missile, a nuclear missile. Only North
Speaker 1: Korea is crazy enough to do that. They don't really
Speaker 1: have the technology. But China and Russia don't want to
Speaker 1: do that. They would much rather use plausible deniability and
Speaker 1: attack our infrastructure. Just take a look at what's going
Speaker 1: on with Ukraine and Russia. Is Russia unleashing nuclear bombs. No,
Speaker 1: they don't want to invite a nuclear war. They're restraining that. Instead.
Speaker 1: What they're doing is they're launching drone attacks and sabotage
Speaker 1: acts on each other's infrastructure. You don't think that's going
Speaker 1: to happen here. If Russia and China really want to
Speaker 1: start something against us, they will engage in that type
Speaker 1: of thing. And guess who. They will use drug carts
Speaker 1: in Venezuela and Mexico to do that type of operation.
Speaker 1: And we've already seen the drug cartels in Mexico go
Speaker 1: after law enforcement, go after politicians, assassinate them, and attack them.
Speaker 1: If that same thing were to happen here, whether it
Speaker 1: was the actual cartel doing it or whether it was
Speaker 1: a false flag by our own government claiming that it
Speaker 1: was a cartel doing it, that will be the excuse
Speaker 1: that the Trump administration will use to enact actual martial law.
Speaker 1: And I believe that this rollout of the police is
Speaker 1: being done in a confrontational way as preparation for that.
Speaker 1: As I said before, if Trump wants to use a
Speaker 1: lot of force to deport people, he could have easily
Speaker 1: started in the states that are going to be friendly
Speaker 1: to that. Instead, he decided that he wanted the conflict
Speaker 1: more than he wanted the deportation. Go to Chicago, and
Speaker 1: he goes to New York, and he goes to Washington,
Speaker 1: DC because he thrives on conflict. This is the WWE presidency.
Speaker 1: And completely ignores the Smalians in Minnesota, which he knew
Speaker 1: about that's been around since his first term. Is widely
Speaker 1: understood that these people are laundering and stealing money for
Speaker 1: El Shabab, but he doesn't do anything about that in
Speaker 1: Minneapolis or Minnesota. Instead, he wants the conflict. What he
Speaker 1: wants is the military's police, and he wants the military
Speaker 1: ass police. And this is what Obama was doing. And
Speaker 1: when I was at Info Wars, we went to a
Speaker 1: great deal of effort to try to expose that to people.
Speaker 1: You know, Biggs and I risked a lot to go
Speaker 1: into that secure area within a military base at Fort
Speaker 1: Hill and I forget what they've called it now, had
Speaker 1: to rename it because it was named after a Confederate
Speaker 1: general forty eight Hill, and there was an asymmetric warfare
Speaker 1: base that was there. We went in there, we filmed it.
Speaker 1: Alex was not happy with that. I got to tell
Speaker 1: you he did everything he could to deep sixth that
Speaker 1: and he never showed it again. But we broadcast live
Speaker 1: for a couple of hours there before we got arrested,
Speaker 1: and we got arrested because he demanded that we go back.
Speaker 1: I mean, I knew we were going to get in
Speaker 1: some hot water. That's why we left. I got Bigs
Speaker 1: to give me the cards, and we went to a mailbox, mailbox,
Speaker 1: et cetera type of place, and I mailed it to
Speaker 1: my family. And because I figured we're going to be
Speaker 1: stopped at the airport before we got there. But Alex
Speaker 1: called back and demanded that we go back and take
Speaker 1: pictures at the entrance of ap Hill. Of course, immediately
Speaker 1: got arrested. We both knew that was going to happen.
Speaker 1: But anyway, so when we look at this, Trump is
Speaker 1: avoided the congressional approval from Duro's capture. Of course he has.
Speaker 1: It raises constitutional concerns. Most Republicans, however, have shared the action.
Speaker 1: Let me just say this, he doesn't want to have
Speaker 1: congressional approval for Maduro's capture. Why he doesn't want to
Speaker 1: scrutiny It's the same thing that you see with the
Speaker 1: climate people, you know, Michael Mann and others don't want
Speaker 1: you to see my data. I want you to follow
Speaker 1: my conclusions and enact policy based on my conclusion, but
Speaker 1: you can't examine the data. Same thing was true of
Speaker 1: the COVID so called pandemic. Don't want you to see
Speaker 1: the data on that. Don't should see the data on
Speaker 1: the vaccines. Just trust me, it's safe and effective. Don't
Speaker 1: look at that. We're not going to show that to you.
Speaker 1: And so this is always the same thing. When people
Speaker 1: are afraid to show you the data, when they are
Speaker 1: afraid to make the case for what they want to do,
Speaker 1: when they're afraid to have debates and deliberations about wars,
Speaker 1: you know, it's a dirty lie. It's always in the cards.
Speaker 1: What this is ultimately about. Well, Mike Lee showed himself
Speaker 1: to be completely spineless sycophant. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: what he put out was first, he put out, I
Speaker 1: look forward to learning what, if anything, might constitutionally justify
Speaker 1: this action in the absence of a declaration of war
Speaker 1: or authorization for the use of military force. He put out, well,
Speaker 1: one hour later, he was begging, essentially begging for forgiveness.
Speaker 1: He got so heavily criticized and ratioed on social media
Speaker 1: over that initial post, which was true. That he comes
Speaker 1: back and says, well, I just got off the phone
Speaker 1: Marco Rubio. He informed me that Maduro has been arrested
Speaker 1: by US personnel to stand trial on criminal charges in
Speaker 1: the US, and that the kinetic action, what he means
Speaker 1: is dropping bombs on civilians. That's kinetic action that we
Speaker 1: saw tonight was deployed to protect and defend those execu
Speaker 1: shooting the arrest warrant. Now, stop and think about the
Speaker 1: absurdity of that. So we're doing a law enforcement operation,
Speaker 1: and so, uh, there's a house that's got some drug
Speaker 1: dealers and they'll say they've got a meth lab or
Speaker 1: something like breaking bad or something. So law enforcement is
Speaker 1: going to go in and it's going to be necessary
Speaker 1: for them to bomb the houses in the neighborhood to
Speaker 1: get this one. That is a meth lab. That's law enforcement.
Speaker 1: That's law enforcement. Mike Lee, are you kidding me? You
Speaker 1: know what this is, you spineless coward. But he got
Speaker 1: ratioed even on that. The comments under that were I
Speaker 1: told you this, if we were listening. He goes, well,
Speaker 1: and he even came back to that. He says, you're
Speaker 1: just some anonymous poster on Twitter. I'm going to the
Speaker 1: Secretary of State to know what this is. And he
Speaker 1: was making apologies and all the rest of stuff about
Speaker 1: having questioned Trump's unconstitutional war. He pretends that bombing the
Speaker 1: city is okay because it is in support of Trump's
Speaker 1: kidnapping of a foreign leader. Really, that's what we're talking
Speaker 1: about here. And you know, it's interesting if you go
Speaker 1: back and look at what the extradition process is, the
Speaker 1: extradition laws when you charge somebody with something, and we
Speaker 1: can see this as it's played out with net Yahoo.
Speaker 1: The bottom line is this is not a war. We
Speaker 1: never had a decoration. We've ignored the rules of war
Speaker 1: as we pretend that it's a war at sea. This
Speaker 1: is not about fentanyl, it's not about cocaine. And it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter if Biden and Trump had a bounty on Maduro.
Speaker 1: This is not a legal extradition. International law and extradition
Speaker 1: is primarily governed by bilateral and multilateral treaties between countries.
Speaker 1: There is no universal customary international while requiring states to
Speaker 1: extradite individuals, and so what this was was an act
Speaker 1: of war. We don't have an extradition treaty with them,
Speaker 1: and of course you're not going to extradite the leader
Speaker 1: of a country. Ever, they say they typically follow the
Speaker 1: UN Nations Model Treaty on Extradition of two thousand and four.
Speaker 1: It is a non binding framework to guide states and
Speaker 1: drafting treaties or defining extradition as a surrender of a
Speaker 1: person who sought for prosecution and punishment of an extradition offense.
Speaker 1: And so the reality is is that, first of all,
Speaker 1: usually extradition is recognized only if there is dual criminality,
Speaker 1: If what the person is doing is a crime in
Speaker 1: that country as well as in our country. The alleged
Speaker 1: act must be punishable as a crime in both three
Speaker 1: questing and requested states, often with a minimum penalty threshold
Speaker 1: such as a year of imprisonment. Here, anybody talk about
Speaker 1: that and about what Maduro was actually charged with. I'll
Speaker 1: get to that in a minute, but it's not really
Speaker 1: anything that is that outrageous. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: when you look at the people that they have summarily
Speaker 1: executed in these boats. The Department of Justice routinely doesn't
Speaker 1: even bother to charge couriers of cocaine, and that's really
Speaker 1: what we're talking about there. So ground's refusal are things
Speaker 1: like terrorism or violence against heads of state. Those are
Speaker 1: the exceptions for that. And when the United Person is
Speaker 1: a high ranking official of a foreign country, such as
Speaker 1: a head of state or a government minister, there's additional
Speaker 1: layers of customary handshaking that goes on irving. Heads of
Speaker 1: state enjoy absolute personal immunity and under customary international law,
Speaker 1: which generally protects them from arrest, prosecution, and extradition by
Speaker 1: foreign states while in office, regardless of the nature of
Speaker 1: the alleged crimes. This immunity stems from principles of state
Speaker 1: sovereignty and non interference within a state from another state.
Speaker 1: And the issue is here it extends to acts performed
Speaker 1: in both official and private capacities. That's one of the
Speaker 1: reasons why you see that Trump's hero do Terte in
Speaker 1: the Philippines, who decided that he was going to just
Speaker 1: execute people that he thought had committed crimes, drug crimes.
Speaker 1: That's why they arrested him, put him in an international
Speaker 1: criminal court after he left office. That's typically what you see,
Speaker 1: but this is also the reason why Rubio continues to
Speaker 1: pretend that Maduro is not president. Oh, he wasn't elected president.
Speaker 1: He's not president. He's just a usurper. He's sitting there,
Speaker 1: he's not really the president. I just have to ask this,
Speaker 1: what would Trump an a Zionist to support net Yahoo say?
Speaker 1: What would they say if net Yahoo were assuming that
Speaker 1: people could do it? If net Yahoo were kidnapped, Let's
Speaker 1: say he's on a foreign trip or something. What would
Speaker 1: they say if net Yahoo was arrested? Because he does
Speaker 1: have the International Criminal Court has put out a warrant
Speaker 1: for his arrest. Now that is not a government entity.
Speaker 1: That is, it's an international tribunal. It's not a national court.
Speaker 1: But the International Criminal Court has an arrest warrant out
Speaker 1: for net Yahoo charging him with war crimes, including starvation
Speaker 1: as it's a method of warfare, and intentionally directing attacks
Speaker 1: against civilians. So would Trump and Warpete be in favor
Speaker 1: of somebody going and getting Netnaho. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: there is a country that has charged him with crimes
Speaker 1: as well. In November. This last November, Turkey issued a
Speaker 1: national rest warrant against Netnahu for alleged genocide and crimes
Speaker 1: against humanity and Gaza along with other senior Israeli officials.
Speaker 1: So if allegations of something are sufficient, and if you
Speaker 1: can go get anybody that your alleged has created a crime,
Speaker 1: including heads of state, you can kidnap them. What is
Speaker 1: the precedent that is being set here. That's something we
Speaker 1: should all think about. Well, I want to thank Star Barkley.
Speaker 1: Thank you for the tip. I appreciate that. If you're right,
Speaker 1: So just a tip to start off the new year
Speaker 1: with both feet on the ground, not right or left.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Thank you very much. I appreciate that. Flump
Speaker 1: seventy six. Thank you for the tips. As politicians get
Speaker 1: to rob the treasury blind and then just evade, invade
Speaker 1: other nations to get back on track, rents and repeat,
Speaker 1: I agree, except I don't think that this is going
Speaker 1: to get us back on track. I think all this
Speaker 1: excitement by the MAGA influencers over this and being picked
Speaker 1: up by the rank and file, Oh look, you know
Speaker 1: we just made seventeen trolly. We're on the road to
Speaker 1: paying off our debt. No, I don't think a penny
Speaker 1: of that's going to go. Good luck and getting taxes
Speaker 1: from the old corporations that are going to get this
Speaker 1: stuff handed to them. We all know how that works.
Speaker 1: Guard Goldsmith lebody conspiracy. Good to see their guard happy
Speaker 1: New Year. We are not individuals to them. We're not
Speaker 1: souls to them. We're nothing more than building blocks for
Speaker 1: their greater good, the pieces of their pyramid. That's right.
Speaker 1: We are livestock. Henry Kissinger has said as much about
Speaker 1: the military. Even Happa Power. Venezuela is free to have
Speaker 1: gay pride parade parties, now, that's right. That's one of
Speaker 1: the things that many people pointed out is that he
Speaker 1: criticized him for being a communist. And yeah, he gets
Speaker 1: a zero on economics, he gets a zero on most
Speaker 1: liberty issues. But he also was standing in the ground
Speaker 1: against the LGBT lobby, stood ground against child mutilation and
Speaker 1: sterilization and things like that. DA thank you for the tip,
Speaker 1: says David. Tell me again how Trump is a Christian?
Speaker 1: Talking like that, MAGA won't believe anything. Well, the Trump,
Speaker 1: I don't know that he's actually said that he's a Christian.
Speaker 1: Pete hegseth. I mean he says he's a Christian, he's
Speaker 1: got it tattooed all over his arms and anything. Let
Speaker 1: me just say, you know, he's going to Doug Wilson's
Speaker 1: church plant there in Washington, d C. Doug, you need
Speaker 1: to do some church discipline on this guy. You need
Speaker 1: to start talking to him about basic ethical and moral principles.
Speaker 1: You need to do a lecture series on the just
Speaker 1: war understanding of war that has informed Christian civilizations for
Speaker 1: quite some time. I think he also writes, David noticed
Speaker 1: that BB comes here the very next day, Trump threatens
Speaker 1: Iran and invades Venezuela. Who is in charge of the USA. Well,
Speaker 1: I think we know right as a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: when you look at this war for Israel, I talked
Speaker 1: about how they were leading this up and saying, well, okay,
Speaker 1: we can't get Trump to attack Iran again. You know
Speaker 1: Netta who has been selling that lie that Trump is
Speaker 1: that Iran is going to have a bomb any day now.
Speaker 1: Any day now, they're going to have a nuclear bomb,
Speaker 1: and he's been telling people that for thirty five years.
Speaker 1: They're just days or months away. And so now Trump
Speaker 1: has bombed these facilities and said he completely destroyed him.
Speaker 1: So he can't make Trump lose face in that. So
Speaker 1: now they have to talk about the fact that it's
Speaker 1: about missiles in general has now become really vague and
Speaker 1: it's just a general war against Iran. And you know,
Speaker 1: that's the other thing that happened over the weekend, and
Speaker 1: that is the fact that I'm going to skip the
Speaker 1: break here actually because i want to talk about this
Speaker 1: since it was brought up what is going on with Iran. Well,
Speaker 1: he's going to basically save the behind of the iatolas
Speaker 1: with his talk. Yeah, we're locked and loaded when you
Speaker 1: look at what is happening in Iran. Iran is experiencing
Speaker 1: the same thing. A lot of countries are. You know,
Speaker 1: as Jeryl Sunty said, this is trained. We're going to
Speaker 1: see gen Z, the up and coming generation is looking
Speaker 1: at this and saying we have no future. This is
Speaker 1: happening globally. You had riots in Nepal, you had riots
Speaker 1: in a lot of different areas about this type of thing,
Speaker 1: and now it's hitting in Iran. And Iran's economy has
Speaker 1: not been all that good. You know, people it seems
Speaker 1: like people will put up a tyranny as long as
Speaker 1: the economy is good. But then once the economy starts
Speaker 1: to tamper down, people start to notice the tyranny and
Speaker 1: get really upset about that. They get upset because they
Speaker 1: don't have any future. And as we were looking at
Speaker 1: asymmetric warfare, that was the assessment of the Pentagon planners.
Speaker 1: As they were talking about why they were doing so
Speaker 1: poorly in Iraq and other places, they said, you know,
Speaker 1: who are these people that are fighting us in Iraq?
Speaker 1: And I said, well, they're typically not religious zealots. The
Speaker 1: religious zelotry comes later. What happens first of all is
Speaker 1: usually these people are well educated. You know, many of
Speaker 1: them had degrees in engineering. They had a future that
Speaker 1: came from an upper middle class or wealthy family, and
Speaker 1: then all of a sudden they feel like that's been
Speaker 1: taken away from them because of geopolitics. So that's what
Speaker 1: motivates them. Then they bring in the religion aspect after
Speaker 1: the fact. But this is what is happening in Iran.
Speaker 1: And you go back and you look at what happened
Speaker 1: under the Shaw of the Shaw. The economic growth in
Speaker 1: Iran was staggering. We should have it so good here.
Speaker 1: We never have not in my lifetime. When you look
Speaker 1: at what has happened in the United States, they were
Speaker 1: getting thirteen fourteen percent a year economic growth and it
Speaker 1: really kicked into high gear with Opek stuff, But a
Speaker 1: lot of that was the US even as that was
Speaker 1: happening in the late nineteen seventies. As I've said many times,
Speaker 1: there were a lot of engineering students who were Iranian
Speaker 1: at the University of South Florida where I was in engineering,
Speaker 1: and I saw these guys out there. I didn't recognize them,
Speaker 1: but because they were wearing balaclavas, and so I knew
Speaker 1: there were a lot of these guys in the engineering classes.
Speaker 1: I didn't usually talk to them, but I was curious
Speaker 1: because they were having all these protests and they were
Speaker 1: wearing these hoods. So I asked them, say, what's that about.
Speaker 1: And they said, well, whenever we have a protest to
Speaker 1: what the Shaw is doing, there are people in the
Speaker 1: crowd who are working for his secret police. They take
Speaker 1: pictures of us, and they identify our families and they
Speaker 1: arrest our families, put them in jail, torture them. That's
Speaker 1: why we wear the masks. That's horrible. Said yeah, I'm
Speaker 1: sure government that trained them. It was a CIA. Again,
Speaker 1: back to the CIA, the criminal intelligence let's just call
Speaker 1: them agency instead of a holes. But the CIA trained
Speaker 1: the Savakh and it's very repressive, but by and large
Speaker 1: the people put up with it until the economy tapered
Speaker 1: off and started to turn down. A little bit. Part
Speaker 1: of the reason that it tapered off and turned down
Speaker 1: was because of people's reaction to that oppression. But all
Speaker 1: of a sudden it accelerated as people and capital began
Speaker 1: fleeing from Iran. They could see the handwriting on the wall,
Speaker 1: and so perhaps the same type of thing could happen
Speaker 1: in Iran. You've had a lot of people that have
Speaker 1: been killed in a lot of riots that were there.
Speaker 1: Even had a situation of one guy doing a standoff
Speaker 1: to the military's police, and they even called it Tehranian
Speaker 1: Square or something to that effect, referring back to Tianeman's Square.
Speaker 1: So what does Trump do. He threatens Iran, He threatens
Speaker 1: the Iotola government. Yeah, we're locked and loaded. He said,
Speaker 1: do you understand that that is already being used by
Speaker 1: the Iotolas to say, well, look that's the great Satan
Speaker 1: that's threatening us. It's to call us support around them.
Speaker 1: Always people will take you to war in order to
Speaker 1: save their sorry domestic government. Trump is doing it for them.
Speaker 1: He's going to go to war with him he's going
Speaker 1: to go to war with them with rhetoric. Trump is
Speaker 1: bailing out the Ayatolas in Iran. And this is the
Speaker 1: insanity of our foreign policy to Iran. It's been wrong
Speaker 1: about everything. And American involvement with Iran did not begin
Speaker 1: with a takeover of the US embassy in seventy nine.
Speaker 1: That was the end of decades of bad policy and
Speaker 1: oppression and torture and a murderous, tyrannical regime that we financed,
Speaker 1: and we thought we could get away with it because
Speaker 1: we were funneling money to them and they were seeing
Speaker 1: their standard of living rise. No, not necessarily, and so
Speaker 1: you see the same type of thing being done still
Speaker 1: in Iran. We never ever learned, never ever learn guard
Speaker 1: Goldsmith says, even if the US were to overlook inter
Speaker 1: national treaties and not ask for extradition, the Congress would
Speaker 1: have to pass letters of mark to hire people to
Speaker 1: go after enemy combatants or pirates, etc. Well, you're absolutely right.
Speaker 1: We don't care about any of that anymore, do we. Well,
Speaker 1: I am going to take a break here and we're
Speaker 1: going to be right back, and I think, well, I
Speaker 1: do have a new song that we're going to play today.
Speaker 1: I hope you enjoy it, but I want to play
Speaker 1: a Christmas song here at this point in time. I
Speaker 1: know it's after Christmas, after New Year's, but I don't care.
Speaker 1: Go Jesus, you know some time you love fau.
Speaker 7: Remember the consisor yous for Remember chriss youk SSI stars
Speaker 7: on the runt. All the world Jesus is game.
Speaker 1: I want to for a mint of time, I want
Speaker 1: to talk about something else had dropped over the weekend
Speaker 1: that didn't get nearly as much attention as it deserved.
Speaker 1: This is a billionaire and Israeli billionaire who is involved
Speaker 1: in CyberSecure and he runs a checkpoint software, Cato Networks
Speaker 1: and other things like that. His name is Shlomo Kramer.
Speaker 1: He came to the US and so that we need
Speaker 1: to end the First Amendment in order to say that.
Speaker 8: It's difficult to hear, but it's time to limit the
Speaker 8: First Amendment in order to protect it and quickly before
Speaker 8: it's too late.
Speaker 10: What do you mean.
Speaker 8: I mean that we need to control the platforms, all
Speaker 8: the social platforms. We need to stack rank the authenticity
Speaker 8: of every person that expresses themselves online and take control
Speaker 8: over what they are saying based on that ranking, government,
Speaker 8: the government.
Speaker 1: Should all right, think about that. What does that mean?
Speaker 9: You know?
Speaker 1: First of all, what does that mean to say we
Speaker 1: need to end the First Amendment in order to protect that?
Speaker 1: What absurdity? What double speak? It's truly orwell in? And
Speaker 1: when he starts talking about the state ranking authenticity, let's
Speaker 1: talk about that as well. Right, they're going to rank
Speaker 1: you and they're going to look at your authenticity, which
Speaker 1: means do you agree with what the state has to say.
Speaker 1: I've talked many times about the CCPA. I call it
Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist Party of America, but actually it stands
Speaker 1: for the Coalition for Content, Providence and Authenticity. And this
Speaker 1: is a coalition of hardware and software companies as well
Speaker 1: as news organizations and governments to look at your content
Speaker 1: and to look at who that content is coming from.
Speaker 1: That's what they mean by providence. They will then authenticate
Speaker 1: you and rank you. And if you are a despised
Speaker 1: person because of your opinions, you will not be able
Speaker 1: to even create audio or video or still picture memes
Speaker 1: or write articles. They will block you. And you've got
Speaker 1: the big companies. Microsoft was heading all of this stuff,
Speaker 1: putting together this coalition. You had companies like Intel and
Speaker 1: arm creating the processors. You had Adobe software creator, all
Speaker 1: coming together in this coalition to identify you, to identify
Speaker 1: your computer, and to keep you from being able to create,
Speaker 1: keep you from being able to upload. That's what he's
Speaker 1: talking about. It's a very real thing. This is not
Speaker 1: just an off the cuff remark from the Israeli billionaire.
Speaker 1: And that's the way that Israel blesses us. Now, when
Speaker 1: people put that up, a lot of people came back
Speaker 1: and said, well, that's not Netanyahu at all. He doesn't
Speaker 1: reflect the Netna who got Well, it turns out that
Speaker 1: he and Netah who have had their personal differences in Israel.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, in Israel, this Shlomo defended
Speaker 1: liberal democracy against net Nyaho. He said, we need freedom
Speaker 1: in Israel. He just doesn't want freedom for you. And
Speaker 1: understand that net Nyaho is more authoritarian than this guy
Speaker 1: who is saying got to end the First Amendment. Of course,
Speaker 1: he's not going to end freedoms for Israelis. He wants
Speaker 1: to end freedoms for Americans. Your freedom to criticize Israelis
Speaker 1: must be ended. You don't think Netanyah who supports that.
Speaker 1: You don't think that they are on the same page
Speaker 1: with this, Well, if you think that you haven't been
Speaker 1: paying attention, it's Netna who getting the Trump administration to
Speaker 1: penalize anybody who criticizes the state of Israel, calling it
Speaker 1: anti semitism. It's not anti semitism, it's against a political organization, which,
Speaker 1: as I pointed out last week, net Ya who is
Speaker 1: when you look at the vaccine, the pandemic stuff. He
Speaker 1: was one of the worst offenders of all the global
Speaker 1: leaders who were on the same page and lockstep, but
Speaker 1: he was one offering his people as lab rat staffizer
Speaker 1: and some of the most restrictive arm twisting of any
Speaker 1: government in terms of forcing people to get the Trump shot.
Speaker 1: And now that that happened and a lot of people
Speaker 1: got hurt in Israel, he harmed a lot of Jews there,
Speaker 1: And now that people have seen that same reaction that
Speaker 1: we're seeing here, people don't want to get the childhood shots.
Speaker 1: People are starting to question the whole vaccine thing. So
Speaker 1: the net Yaho administration is talking about how they can
Speaker 1: penalize financially people who don't get the vaccine schedule that's
Speaker 1: been demanded so yeah, Netnaho doesn't care even about the
Speaker 1: civil liberties of Jews in Israel, certainly doesn't care about
Speaker 1: civil liberties of Americans. Here this guy who opposed him
Speaker 1: for attacking the freedoms and civil liberties of Jews. This
Speaker 1: Shlomo Kramer wants to, however, do the same thing to us.
Speaker 1: Both of them agree on punishing Israel. That's sure, that's
Speaker 1: your blessing for all the people who misread that biblical passage. There,
Speaker 1: So again censorship for us, but not for them. So
Speaker 1: top Department of Justice official who trained Pam Bondy on
Speaker 1: ethics rules in the department was then fired. And if
Speaker 1: you don't think that these people are fully on board
Speaker 1: with this, if you don't think that Pam Bondy is
Speaker 1: fully on board with censorship over hate speech, This is
Speaker 1: an older clip of her talking about that in the
Speaker 1: context of criticizing Israel, there's free.
Speaker 6: Speech and then there's hate speech, and there is no place,
Speaker 6: especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie in our society.
Speaker 11: Do you see more law enforcement going after these groups
Speaker 11: who are using hate speech and putting cuffs on people
Speaker 11: so we show them that some action is better than
Speaker 11: no action.
Speaker 6: We will absolutely target you, go after you if you
Speaker 6: are targeting anyone with hate speech anything, and that's across the.
Speaker 1: Odds, any speech that we hate. Right, Yeah, we're going
Speaker 1: to go after you if you say anything that we hate,
Speaker 1: that we disagree with. And this has been going on
Speaker 1: for something. Look, if you don't tolerate speech that you
Speaker 1: disagree with, you don't tolerate free speech at all. There's
Speaker 1: no distinction between free speech and hate speech. If you
Speaker 1: have hate speech laws, that is a repudiation of free speech. Well,
Speaker 1: Bondi says she's going to hold former officials accountable for
Speaker 1: government weaponization. She's talking about getting rid of the First
Speaker 1: Amendment as well. Again, she's going to decide what is
Speaker 1: true and false. She will decide what is weaponization. And
Speaker 1: of course, if she comes after the First Amendment, it's
Speaker 1: not weaponization of government at all. Well, she better start
Speaker 1: with herself if she's going to come after people who
Speaker 1: are weaponizing government against other individuals. Did Brett Kavanaugh just
Speaker 1: apologize for betraying the Fourth Amendment? Maybe? Says Reason. Back
Speaker 1: in September, the Supreme Court issued an unsigned emergency order
Speaker 1: that effectively permitted racial profiling as part of Trump's roving
Speaker 1: immigration crackdowns. Writing in Concurrence, Kavanaugh claimed that it was
Speaker 1: only common sense to allow immigration agents to stop people
Speaker 1: based on such relevant factors. He said, as quote apparent ethnicity. Well,
Speaker 1: it's kind of interesting because now that he's seen a
Speaker 1: couple of months of this, he's had a change of heart.
Speaker 1: Reminds me very much of the case that I've talked
Speaker 1: about so many times, about the Cherokee Trail of Tears
Speaker 1: and how Andrew Jackson went to the Supreme Court over this.
Speaker 1: You know, can I move these people? Can I deport
Speaker 1: them out of their homeland into some other place? And
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court greenlighted it. And then when they saw
Speaker 1: what was happening with the Trail of Tears, they had
Speaker 1: a change of heart and they reversed it. And Andrew
Speaker 1: Jackson famously said, well, they've issued their opinion, let's see
Speaker 1: them enforce it. He had the force, and he actually
Speaker 1: had the law on the Constitution on his side because
Speaker 1: of the separation of powers. And I've used that illustration
Speaker 1: many times to say that we do not have to
Speaker 1: be slaves to Supreme Court decisions. And I used it
Speaker 1: in the context of abortion. I said governors should stand
Speaker 1: against that aid, which was a court case in Texas.
Speaker 1: The Texas governor at the time should have said, well,
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court's issued their opinion, let's see that m
Speaker 1: enforce it. I'm going to protect innocent life. They didn't
Speaker 1: do that, and no government, no president ever did that,
Speaker 1: And so for decades, for about fifty years, we had
Speaker 1: sixty some odd million babies killed because people didn't assert that. Well,
Speaker 1: Cavanagh has now had a change of heart, just like
Speaker 1: the Scotis did under the Cherokey decision. But it's not
Speaker 1: really going to make any difference. He or he wrote
Speaker 1: that decision, he said last week. Supreme Court issued another
Speaker 1: unsigned emergency order on December twenty third, and another immigration
Speaker 1: related case, except this time Kavanaugh penned a concurrence that
Speaker 1: approached the issue of rights violating federal officers quite differently.
Speaker 1: Here's what he wrote last week. The state and government
Speaker 1: disagree about whether the immigration officers have violated the Constitution
Speaker 1: making certain immigration stops and arrests. The basic constitutional rules
Speaker 1: governing that dispute are long standing and clear. The Fourth
Speaker 1: Amendment requires that immigration stops must be based on reasonable
Speaker 1: suspicion of the illegal president presence, not just your ethnicity.
Speaker 1: Stops must be brief, arrests must be based on probable cause,
Speaker 1: and the officers must not employ excessive force. More Over,
Speaker 1: the officers must not make interior immigration stops or arrests
Speaker 1: based on race or ethnicity. When he originally penned the
Speaker 1: first decision, he said, well, I think if somebody is
Speaker 1: stopped because their ethnicity, it'll be brief and it won't
Speaker 1: be a big deal, right, But then they saw that
Speaker 1: it really was a big deal and the way this
Speaker 1: is being done. Now, go back and get a conscience
Speaker 1: about what's being done with a TSA, what's being done
Speaker 1: with surveillance, and all the rest of this stuff. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is just one small facet of what is happening.
Speaker 1: But as we move into twenty twenty six, already the
Speaker 1: people are sharing the fact that this is the two
Speaker 1: hundredth and fiftieth anniversary of the declaration of independence, it's
Speaker 1: time for another one. Yet Chief Justice John Roberts says
Speaker 1: the nation's legal foundation is unshaken. No, it's been broken, shredded, burned.
Speaker 1: And he's had a big hent in all of this
Speaker 1: stuff as well. So, yeah, we've had. Everything's just fine. Well,
Speaker 1: once you to take a look at civilast at forfiture,
Speaker 1: the TSA, at the bombing of boats and other areas, etc, Etc. Etc.
Speaker 1: I could go on forever. The former history major, I
Speaker 1: didn't know that John Roberts was a history major, extolled
Speaker 1: the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, which he said
Speaker 1: continue to survive through national discord. President Calvin Coolidge's comments
Speaker 1: at the nation's one hundred and fiftieth anniversary, he said
Speaker 1: two great charters of freedom and justice remained firm and unshaken.
Speaker 1: Roberts said it was true then and it's true now,
Speaker 1: and he's lying to you. You know, it's interesting that
Speaker 1: the is a history professor. I ought to know this.
Speaker 1: The it's not just the Constitution and the Decoration Independence
Speaker 1: that are being destroyed. The Magna Karta is being defied
Speaker 1: and destroyed in the UK and elsewhere in principle, everywhere
Speaker 1: you look. Here's the situation, folks. And this is actually
Speaker 1: kind of comical. Something happened in Japan. Lance saw this
Speaker 1: and he went hysterical, laughing, and he showed these clips
Speaker 1: to me. America has a reputation now of being a
Speaker 1: police state because the war on drugs and other things
Speaker 1: like that, so much so that in Japan they did
Speaker 1: a very very detailed larp, you know, role playing game
Speaker 1: where everybody dressed up like American cops, even had body
Speaker 1: cameras that were recording and that you'll see this video.
Speaker 1: They've been blurred out people's faces and everything, and they're
Speaker 1: knocking on doors and uh, you know, say Parice, and
Speaker 1: then he turned around and says the other guy, it's
Speaker 1: rocked me. The door is locked.
Speaker 10: Uh.
Speaker 1: This is uh, they're actually playing and role playing games.
Speaker 1: And this is what I saw with asymmetric warfare, what
Speaker 1: the military was doing. But here's Japan playing American police.
Speaker 1: And they've even got uh the livery on the cars
Speaker 1: it says New York Police Department, and they're all in
Speaker 1: uniform and everything. This is the way these guys are
Speaker 1: playing this game. Get to play cop. This is what
Speaker 1: America is exporting to the world, aren't you pro out?
Speaker 1: This is how they say us. There's another actual raid
Speaker 1: that's going on. They got the one clans.
Speaker 2: Them opened the door.
Speaker 6: There is the parament opened the door.
Speaker 1: These are people playing police, playing American cops in Japan,
Speaker 1: speaking in English, yeah, and they've got like airsoft pistols
Speaker 1: and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 4: Show four guys, rock Ship Rock.
Speaker 1: The door is rocked. Well, we're gonna leave it at that.
Speaker 1: You get the idea, that's the way the world sees us,
Speaker 1: and it's accurate. John Roberts thinks that the Constitution is
Speaker 1: still in effect, that Bill Rights is still in effect.
Speaker 1: As John whitead pointed out, I didn't realize this, but
Speaker 1: Trump's White House on the very first day of office,
Speaker 1: they got rid of the Constitution of Bill Wrights on
Speaker 1: the White House website. Think about that. I think that
Speaker 1: was a coincidence. It doesn't really matter if it's there
Speaker 1: not they it's been effectively gotten rid of by them
Speaker 1: over and over again. Well, I wanted to talk a
Speaker 1: little bit about what's happened over over last year and
Speaker 1: what happened around New Years. I'm gonna take a quick
Speaker 1: break here. And by the way, this is a I've
Speaker 1: got lyrics for this song. I don't have anybody singing it.
Speaker 1: That's another issue altogether. But I put this together. You've
Speaker 1: heard this before. That's actually the tune is from theme
Speaker 1: from Rudy. You may like the lyrics app you like
Speaker 1: the lyrics We'll be right back. Well, Americans will drop
Speaker 1: everything and anything to celebrate New Year's Eve? Did see
Speaker 1: this happened in New York? He had a massive hoax.
Speaker 1: There's always a joke about hey, I got a bridge
Speaker 1: I can sell you in Brooklyn. Right, Well, it wasn't
Speaker 1: the bridge that they were selling, but it was fireworks
Speaker 1: display on the bridge that they were selling to people.
Speaker 1: And it turned out to be a hoax. You had
Speaker 1: thousands of people who shut up to watch what had
Speaker 1: gone around on social media. Was going to be a
Speaker 1: fireworks display at the Brooklyn Bridge, thousands of people and
Speaker 1: here's what happened. Nothing, Wait a minute, Yeah it was
Speaker 1: a lie. There's no fireworks there, so yeah, that's I
Speaker 1: thought that was a really funny course. We watched some
Speaker 1: of the fires who watched the ball drop what we
Speaker 1: used to do and then turn it off. I don't
Speaker 1: cao much for the entertainment they have in New York anymore,
Speaker 1: but anyway, not my culture. There was a fireworks display
Speaker 1: in London that's all centered around the big eye of
Speaker 1: one of the big Ferris wheels they have there, and
Speaker 1: we're watching it and there were these projected images in
Speaker 1: the center of the wheel. I thought, wow, that's amazing.
Speaker 1: What is that? How'd they do that? Are they protecting that?
Speaker 1: At first there was a lot of smoke. Are they
Speaker 1: protecting it? On the smoke? But it looked very, very flat.
Speaker 1: It didn't look like it had the the profile of
Speaker 1: the smoke or anything, and didn't have any missing areas there.
Speaker 1: And so they kept doing it one thing after the other,
Speaker 1: and so we looked it up and it was being
Speaker 1: done broadcast by the BBC. The PBC was adding those
Speaker 1: graphics after the fact. And this is something that the
Speaker 1: Chinese communists had done a few years ago. They basically
Speaker 1: had a situation. People showed up for fireworks display, but
Speaker 1: there was no fireworks display except on the internet. They
Speaker 1: added the fireworks and post as we say, so, I
Speaker 1: guess nobody has gone through and added the fireworks and
Speaker 1: posts for the Brooklyn Bridge people with thousands of people
Speaker 1: showed up to see that and there was nothing there.
Speaker 1: And I guess in a sense, that was the dog
Speaker 1: that did not bark over the weekend always in the past,
Speaker 1: whether it was Fourth of July or whether it was
Speaker 1: New Year's Eve. Here in Tennessee, we're up elevated in
Speaker 1: an area, and we would you know, I haven't done
Speaker 1: fireworks for quite a while because I thought they were expensive.
Speaker 1: But there were tons of people all over the place
Speaker 1: that were doing fireworks and would look out over the
Speaker 1: hills and we'd see them all over the place happening.
Speaker 1: But in the immediate area there were a lot of
Speaker 1: people setting off fireworks in their own backyard that were
Speaker 1: very very close to us. This year, nothing, nothing at all.
Speaker 1: That's really strange. And then Karen started looking at posts
Speaker 1: from people that she knows in different areas of the country.
Speaker 1: They were saying the same thing. Her mother in Florida
Speaker 1: said the same thing. She says, as a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: usually people go out there banging on pots and pans
Speaker 1: at midnight. That wasn't even happening. Well, so what is
Speaker 1: that telling us? First my first impression was, well, fireworks
Speaker 1: are expensive. People are worried about the economy. Maybe they're
Speaker 1: not spending the money on the fireworks. But then I
Speaker 1: started thinking about they talk about different countries and whether
Speaker 1: or not fireworks are integral to New Year's Eve and
Speaker 1: for a lot of people. This is an article from
Speaker 1: zero Hedge or fireworks integral to New Year's Eve in
Speaker 1: different countries. They said, well, it's bad for the environment,
Speaker 1: it's distressing to animals and people with conditions such as
Speaker 1: PTSD as well as dangerous and so you know, we
Speaker 1: did spend one New Year's Eve looking for a little
Speaker 1: Yorkshire terrier that got freaked out and ran away at
Speaker 1: the house where we were celebrating. So yeah, I almost
Speaker 1: get distressed about that. But that didn't happen this year,
Speaker 1: And like I said, not even any pots and pans,
Speaker 1: and part of it, I think it goes beyond economics.
Speaker 1: I think it also goes to our increasing isolation from
Speaker 1: each other. Typically, people in a neighborhood and everything are
Speaker 1: going to get together. Might have neighbors getting together, you
Speaker 1: might have somebody having a party. I mean, if it's
Speaker 1: just you and your immediate family, you're going to go
Speaker 1: out and spend a lot of money on fireworks. Evidently not,
Speaker 1: they're pointing out that fireworks are a bigger deal. According
Speaker 1: to a poll in Germany than anywhere else, twenty nine
Speaker 1: percent of the people I believe they to have fireworks.
Speaker 1: In the US is twenty seven percent, much lower in
Speaker 1: other countries like Mexico, only fourteen percent. But the reality
Speaker 1: is is that it's also part of the dying socialization.
Speaker 1: It's kind of funny to me that that was always
Speaker 1: the first thing somebody would say to us when we
Speaker 1: homeschool our kids back in the early nineties, Well, you're
Speaker 1: not getting them socialized or whatever. Look at the state
Speaker 1: of socialization now. Everybody is isolated, and it's even when
Speaker 1: it comes to the parties. The other thing I thought
Speaker 1: was interesting was this article coming out of the UK
Speaker 1: and aversion to alcohol is making sober raves and increasingly
Speaker 1: popular alternative. I thought about this, look at all of
Speaker 1: the effort by the US government to stop people from drinking,
Speaker 1: and what a total failure the Eighteenth Amendment was, and
Speaker 1: yet now people are having And this isn't just in
Speaker 1: the UK, it's also in some Asian countries. They're trying
Speaker 1: to get healthy, they're tired of the way alcohol makes
Speaker 1: them feel. They're having coffee parties in the morning rather
Speaker 1: than having cocktail parties at night. That's the gist of
Speaker 1: this article. People can figure this stuff out. They don't
Speaker 1: need government paternalism. Sa Miller one two three says under Trump,
Speaker 1: the US has bombed seven countries. That's right, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Iraq, Iran, Nigeria, Venezuela,
Speaker 1: scare tactics and land grams. That's absolutely right. I guess
Speaker 1: that's one of the reasons why he thought he deserved
Speaker 1: a Peace prize, because you know, Obama started seven wars
Speaker 1: and Trump has done that many or revived wars that
Speaker 1: were in many cases silent. DG eight, Thank you for
Speaker 1: the tip, says David. No arrest for J six tyranny,
Speaker 1: No rest for COVID tyranny, No Fauci arrests, nos seen
Speaker 1: client list arrests. No, the first arrest is a foreign leader.
Speaker 1: Pathetic and even more pathetic that Trump just before that
Speaker 1: had issued a pardon for a guy who really was
Speaker 1: dealing drugs, the Honduran president. Now he was caught, he
Speaker 1: was tried and convicted, but in jail. Trump released him
Speaker 1: and then goes and gets Maduro, who again I have
Speaker 1: I think Maduro is corrupt, he's a communist, but that's
Speaker 1: none of our business actually, and lies about the the
Speaker 1: drug stuff or just cover for what they wanted to do. Well,
Speaker 1: as we look at what is coming this year, you know,
Speaker 1: I was on New Year's Eve, I was on Courtney
Speaker 1: Turner's show, not Coney Turner, Shannon Joy Shannon Joy's show,
Speaker 1: and I appreciate her having me on. And when we
Speaker 1: talked about what was coming up in the next year,
Speaker 1: my advice to them give you my same advice to you,
Speaker 1: as I think this is going to be a very
Speaker 1: difficult year. I think things are going to really accelerate.
Speaker 1: We're going to see a lot of chaos. I think
Speaker 1: we're going to see wars, and I think it's you know, economically,
Speaker 1: it's going to be challenging for people as well. And
Speaker 1: so my advice to you would be to get a diary.
Speaker 1: And I'm not selling the book in the bookmark thing
Speaker 1: now that I saw before. I'm serious about it. I mean,
Speaker 1: get anything and write it down. I write down in
Speaker 1: something like I've got with this, keep a record of it.
Speaker 1: But do it for your own growth. Do it because
Speaker 1: you can see God working in your life in retrospect,
Speaker 1: especially when you get into difficult times like this, and
Speaker 1: it'll be when you start to see things and just
Speaker 1: you know, after a few months you can go back
Speaker 1: and look at and say, wow, that was kind of
Speaker 1: interesting how God worked that out in my life. And
Speaker 1: it's going to give you confidence for what you can
Speaker 1: do when you get other types of trials. It's so
Speaker 1: important that we don't forget, and we do forget. We
Speaker 1: think we remember, but we don't. And I have had
Speaker 1: that experience over and over again, which really surprised me,
Speaker 1: because really, when I write things down, I typically remember them.
Speaker 1: If I just read it or talk about it a
Speaker 1: lot of times, I'll forget it. But if I write
Speaker 1: something down, I usually remember it. And yet I was
Speaker 1: surprised to find that when I went back and looked
Speaker 1: at my diaries, that I had forgotten a lot of
Speaker 1: the details of how God had answered prayer and how
Speaker 1: circumstances had been taken care of in various things, or
Speaker 1: what we learned from the difficult circumstances that were not removed.
Speaker 1: And so this is an opportunity. I think this next
Speaker 1: year it's going to be you know, crisis is danger
Speaker 1: and opportunity. That's the Chinese symbol for crisis, those two
Speaker 1: things a symbol for symbol for opportunity. I think this
Speaker 1: is going to be a very dangerous year, and I
Speaker 1: think it's real opportunity for spiritual growth for you, and
Speaker 1: to take a look at the things that are really
Speaker 1: important in your life, and so that'd be my advice
Speaker 1: to you. In addition to that, I would say prepare.
Speaker 1: I didn't have time to talk about today, but there
Speaker 1: was an article about Victory gardens and the massive quantity
Speaker 1: of vegetables that were grown during World War Two by
Speaker 1: people through the Victory gardens. The government actually actively encourage
Speaker 1: people to grow food for their own use. I would
Speaker 1: suggest that I would also suggest that you start to
Speaker 1: do some things for your own use in terms of
Speaker 1: energy and other things like that that are so easily disrupted.
Speaker 1: As we move and again we're moving towards conflict and
Speaker 1: towards chaos. That has been the unifying theme of everything
Speaker 1: that Trump has done. Everything that he's done has been
Speaker 1: about conflict and chaos, and that's going to continue to escalate.
Speaker 1: And as we move into that kind of a situation,
Speaker 1: it's more important than ever to prepare. And that's why
Speaker 1: I talk about the diaries and you know, your own
Speaker 1: time with God. That is a kind of preparation that
Speaker 1: goes beyond the gardens and goes beyond having you know,
Speaker 1: prepper items that are set there. You certainly need to
Speaker 1: do that as well. But it's a time to prepare
Speaker 1: yourself and to think about what is coming on, because
Speaker 1: things are going to be very challenging, I think, and
Speaker 1: I think you just need to look at it as
Speaker 1: an opportunity to grow in your relationship with God. That's
Speaker 1: the key thing, you know, even as we look at
Speaker 1: electricity prices, something that's that fundamental food as well as
Speaker 1: electricity are going up rapidly. And there's some interesting articles
Speaker 1: that I don't have time to cover that talk about
Speaker 1: it from a partisan perspective. When these people say, well, look,
Speaker 1: you know in the Blue States, the prices of electricity
Speaker 1: have skyrocketed, and they said because these same quote unquote
Speaker 1: Blue states are putting in these state renewable mandates. And
Speaker 1: it's actually that is something the price of electricity is
Speaker 1: something that is controlled at the state level. There's even
Speaker 1: a federal law blocking the federal government from setting these
Speaker 1: electricity prices. And so that's why there's such a variation
Speaker 1: and why you can see that these different policies are
Speaker 1: raising the prices and stuff. Going back to two thousand
Speaker 1: and eight, I was working with a group that had
Speaker 1: a lawsuit going against Colorado. They were the very first
Speaker 1: state to do these renewable mandates, so we knew where
Speaker 1: it was going. We knew it would do exactly this
Speaker 1: type of thing. But we've got clowns on the left
Speaker 1: who are pushing this for the Green agenda, and we're
Speaker 1: going to have clowns on the right who are pushing
Speaker 1: it for the AI data centers. And that's why Trump
Speaker 1: is pushing to stop any regulation of AI at the
Speaker 1: state level, because that's where you could stop it, and
Speaker 1: he doesn't want it stopped. Thank you for joining us.
Speaker 1: Have a good day. The common man. They created common
Speaker 1: Core and dumb down our children. They created common past,
Speaker 1: track and control us their Commons project to make sure
Speaker 1: the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see
Speaker 1: the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of
Speaker 1: us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
Speaker 1: That is what we have in common. That is what
Speaker 1: they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
Speaker 1: They desire to know everything about us while they hide
Speaker 1: everything from us. It's time to turn that around and
Speaker 1: expose what they want to hide. Please share the information
Speaker 1: and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank
Speaker 1: you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't
Speaker 1: support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. D
Speaker 1: Davidnightshow dot com