Speaker 1: Welcome to the Three Stories version of The Todd Herman Show.
Story number one, the most important medical lawsuit in history
has just been announced. Story number two, Democrats in Minnesota
are defending what cannot be defended. And story number three,
it's brutally obvious and easily obvious that God exists and
design this all. We'll talk about this all with the
help of Know Your Risk podcast. That's as the figurehead
would say, that's Zach Abraham's outfit. We'll talk about this
with the help of God Almighty.
Speaker 2: The Todd Herman Show is one disapproved by big pharma
technocarrats in Tyrn, sebrianwhere from the high mountains of Free America.
Here's the Emerald City exime Todd Herman.
Speaker 1: Today is the day the Lord has made in These
are the times so which God has decided we shall
live the economic form the world version so fascinating. Klass
Schwab said something. Did he know that there was a
huge lawsuit coming out that belies everything he said about trust?
I don't think he did. So let's start with klass Schwab.
Klaus made a statement about trust, trust, and he did
this in a promotional video, and you know what's promotional
because you know people hang out in their houses with
their libraries, with cameras there as they come and sit
down like I just hang out here all day. This
is just my natural environment. This isn't some kind of
TV studio.
Speaker 3: You right that our society faces a dramatic but elusive crisis.
Can you explain we I'm missing in our society two
fundamental pillows. It's truth and it's trust. Those pillars we
will not be able to solve some big global issues
which we face such this moment. It's a key road
of dialogue of listening each to a nouzzle?
Speaker 1: Can I pause?
Speaker 3: That?
Speaker 2: Is that?
Speaker 1: Okay? Is it ok? If I pause it? Klaus? Can
I just ask you to pause real quick, sir? You
censored people, You coordinated with social media companies to censor
and down. You weren't listening at all, even a little bit.
You don't listen or display any awareness that when you
speak of trust, and you have been telling us that
we can't continue to produce carbon dioxide at the levels
we do, which is in fact what we exhale. You
still fly private planes into that every year. It's difficult
to trust you when you tell us to do things
you don't do, and that we can't have things you have.
And when you post a video like this that you
can pay to have distributed globally and seen billions of times,
but you coordinated with social media companies too, and you
still coordinate with social media companies too. So this trust
thing that you like, maybe you should act in a
trustworthy way. So let's get back to Klaus Schwab and
his need for trust and.
Speaker 3: In such a way to see a different aspect, search
different dimensions of a problem, and search fundamental in order
to be able to create after all solutions.
Speaker 1: Okay, so maybe this might involve having let's say, dissident
scientists invited to the table to talk about approaches to things.
Let's say maybe the founder of green Peace who disagrees
with you, Klaus, about climate change and about how it's
cost After all, he found the green piece, which is
a pretty big deal. Or maybe you could have let's say,
some farmers who raise free range cattle who could show
you studies study after study that free range cattle in
fact is better for the environment then ranch cattle, and
in fact is good for the environment. They could do that.
You could have these dissidents, but you don't. You don't trust.
You also push down upon the world one specific medical
solution you knew you were going to push. There's a
lawsuit on this, and I'll just go to what's in
the lawsuit in a second. If you want to talk
about trust, and let's let mister Shaup finish, because he
took a lot of effort to sit here in film this.
Speaker 3: If there is one decisive factor of the intelligent age,
what is it? I think it's the capability in view
of the fast and disruptive technology could change to remain
human beings. And as human beings, we have to exercise empassy.
We have to listen each to another, and I think
we have to analyze issues, not just research.
Speaker 1: Okay, I can't. Sorry, I can't let them finish. I
promise unfinished and I can't. I was ten seconds to
go just and I could not do it. Okay. I
need to be careful because there are platforms that can
get me in big well not in big trouble, remaining human. Klaus,
one of your key advisors, says that our brains are
going to go away, that we are going to become
memories uploaded into robots. He says that is our future
and empathy human beings. Your key advisor just said that
AI will seize control of the Bible of God's word.
That's difficult to trust you when one of your key
advisors is saying things like this. Your organization and key
advisors within your organization have said that we need to
call the herd of human beings by about seven billion,
but maybe not you guys. So it's difficult to trust.
That's all I'm saying. Then there's this lawsuit against some
of your biggest supporters, and I will not provide, let's say,
opinion on this, because man, I could get in trouble
for favoring your opinion. Why don't I just say what's
in this lawsuit against the American Academy of Pediatrics and
why it exists and why it's probably the most important
medical lawsuit in history. It goes down to money. Your
ability to enjoy retirement goes down to this, how much
money will you have every single month for the rest
of your life. If you don't know that number, you
have no plan for retirement. You don't have any idea
what retirement is actually going to be like. Now, If
you have a plan. Let's say you're in a buy
and hold portfolio and that plan came about before AI.
That plan is now one hundred percent obsolete in my judgment,
if you're five, ten, fifteen years from retirement, that plan
is going to be more obsolete every single month as
AI eats more jobs and more capabilities and mints more
billionaires of people who just get really really good at
manipulating AI. So you add to that all the volatility
factors in the globe, such as wars of rumors of wars,
and the destabilation of American society and lawsuits like this
which could do a lot to destroy pharma. We are
in a volatile time. May I suggest something. This is
a free service. It is a free live webinar called
the New Year Reset, coming up January twenty ninth at
three thirty Pacific. My friend and brother, Zach Abraham, chief
Investment offs Are Capital Management, is putting this on. It
happens they had an incredible year last year. They have
incredible years often during times of volatility because of the
way they manage money. In my judgment, here's all you
need to do to register for this free live webinar.
They're going to talk about AI what it's likely to
do to your retirement plans. Go to Know Your riskpodcast
dot com and register. It is that easy. Know Your
Risk podcast dot com. Investment Advice at services off through
Teck Financial LC and SEC registered investment advisor. Investments involved
risk and are not guaranteed pastformances and guaranteed future results
TRUK twenty six, Dash zero five. So Klaus Schwabs spoke
of trust and the disappearing nature of trust. And there
is now a lawsuit against the American Academy of Pediatrics.
It's a rico lawsuit. This lawsuit contends that the American
Academy of Pediatrics is an organized crime organization working to
enrich themselves through things like wire fraud. So let's start
with who the big donors are to the American Academy Pediatrics.
And let's just ask a very simple question, not express
an opinion, asking a question. Is it the job of
pediatricians to prescribe medicine? Is that their job? No, Their
job is to observe each individual patients and each individual
patient's needs and to pursue the least invasive thing. First.
Their own ethics say this, First, do no harm seek
the least invasive measure and then carry on from there
if the least invasive mesures don't work. So corporate donors
to the AAP Friends of Children Fund Merk Maderna, Pfizer,
and Sonofi. These are pharmaceutical companies, obviously, so it becomes
then interesting to ask, is it, in fact the job
of pediatricians to hand out drugs and to put kids
on drugs. Here's what the lawsuit contends that the PhD
in multiple plaintiffs has file the lawsuit Children's Health Defense
Fund against the AAP, accusing the organization of long term
fraud and racketeering tied to the vaccine safety claims. That's
what the lawsuit says. Lawsuit alleges the AAP violated RICO
by engaging in sustained patterns of deceptives messaging about the
DC childhood vaccine schedule while operating within a financial ecosystem
tied to vaccine manufacture, funding and incentive driven pediatric vaccination practices.
Now it's a point of fact that pediatricians get paid
money to get kids vaccinated on the schedule, and it
can be a lot of money. With the COVID shots,
it was a ton of money. Some hospitals earned six
thousand dollars per shot, not person per shot. The lawsuit
alleges the AAP repeatedly promoted false certainty that the childhood
vaccine schedule is thoroughly tested and safe. Some of the
things they said they did include wire fraud. These are specifically,
these are from the lawsuit wire and mail fraud, conspiracy,
systematic suppression of scientists and scientific studies and doctors that
contradicted their message, and profiting from vaccines through insurance incentives,
bonus and pay for performance schemes. And the lawsuit sites
federal law eighteen US Code nineteen sixty two C and
D in eighteen US Code nineteen sixty four C. The
first is the civil racketeering law Civil rico. The second
is treble damages for injury to businesses or property. They're
also seeking ancillary jurisdiction for declatory injunctive relief under federal
and civil statues. So what they're seeking in terms of
some of the injunctive relief is they want the organization
American Academy Pediatrics to have to correct their website to
go in change what they've been lying about. According to
the lawsuits, and to pay people who've been harmed by this,
doctors who've been taken out of practice, et cetera. It
happens that right at the same time, the American Academy
of Pediatrics is suing the National Institute of Health and
Robert F. Kennedy Junior as an individual, and a judge
just allowed that lawsuit to continue. The judge did not
cite any medical evidence. The judge did not cite any
medical injury evidence. The judge did not cite any scientific evidence.
What the judge said was the lawsuit can proceed because
the American Academy of Pediatrics would have to do something unthinkable.
Are you ready for what they'd have to do? Talk
to their members. There's sixty thousand or so members of
the American Academy Pediatrics. This judge allowed the lawsuit to
continue because they might have to put out emails or
do zoom meetings, or send paper mail to their members
explaining the new schedule, or they could just send out
an email linking to the CDC's website that actually explains
the schedule. Now for you, if you've ever run a
business and you ever get some of these posters from
your local regulatory agencies. Here's how you get your breaks.
This is how often you have to give people breaks.
You have to post those. Sometimes you're told you have
to take meetings and explain these things. HR will commonly say,
you know what, there's a new federal law related to
workplace safety. We have to have a meeting. Our lawyers
have said you have to say these things. If you've
ever bet a corporate manager, ever at a Fortune five
hundred company, you've had these must meets with your employees. Okay,
there's some new anti discrimination stuff we need to talk about.
We've got some email retention policies. That's not grounds for
a lawsuit, it's grounds to say it's annoying. But on
the topic of trust, how do we trust an American
Academy of Pediatrics who is apparently suing because they have
to open their mouths and explain a changing government policy
to their members. When every accountant, every business owner, every
manager who's ever done a people managing job has had
to do the same exact thing. Class Shop wants a
dialogue start there. How can we probably trust, possibly trust
under circumstances like this story. Number two Democrats in Minnesota
are defending what cannot be defended. If you ever find
yourself in let's say a pretend debate and it's something
that you're nervous about because man, I don't think I
can defend this, then you know where the people in
Minnesota are at because they're defending the indefensible. And if
you find yourself defending the indefensible, maybe it's a good
idea to step back and say, how did I get
to this point where I'm putting my body on the line,
my freedom on the line, my job history on the line,
my ability to go get a job on the line
by defending the indefensible. So let's go up to a
high level what's going on in Minnesota. You can have
all sorts of debates about removing people from the country illegally.
I'm happy to have those debates. Should we even remove
people who are here illegally? My response to this is,
do we want to have laws or suggestions? If we
don't enforce our laws, they're suggestions. If you want to
have a nation of suggestions, what you want to have
is a nation of chaos. Because you could boil this
down to something as simple as a four way stop.
Right now, we come to a four way stop. Everybody stops,
and there's an order in which people go. If that's
no longer a law, but it's a suggestion, then there
might be people in great big trucks who say, I
don't need this stop. It's just a suggestion. You could
look at this in fact, in something that's not even law.
In airplane, you get your assigned seat, you go online,
and you make sure that the teach you want. For me,
I always want to sit in one A or one C.
That's just me. I always try to pursue one A
or one C. And then I get the tickets. Is
one A or one C? Or the app it says
one A or one C. But that's the rule. I
bought one air one C. If it's no longer the rule,
it's just a suggestion. Then I get there and someone's
sitting in my seat. There's nothing I can do about it.
If that's a society you want, have a go change
our laws. So we don't have laws, we have suggestions
for me. Immigration law is only law so long as
we enforce it. Should we do it compassionately?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 1: When possible? Absolutely? Like what if the Trump administration did this?
What if they provided an app that the people who around.
Joe Biden created that immigrants who came here illegally could
go fill out the app form, get a free plane
ticket with their families back to the country of origin,
get twenty six hundred dollars, and be allowed to get
back in line to come back. They did it. That exists.
That's compassionate. You can self deport and get put on
a list to come back in the right way. Come back.
You did it the right way. Come back. We want
you here. Come back so we can have all these debates.
But if you ever find yourself doing something like this
female protester did, putting your body on the line for
someone you would let around your kids. Unless you're well,
spiritually captured plus insane, you need to step back and
ask yourself how you got in such a position. And
I'll show you this in just a second. Sometimes you're
my age. You get yourself in these positions physically. I
have friends of mine who simply can't do the things
that may give their life meaning, like working. I have
friends of mine who've lost the ability to use their
hands well or pick up their grandkids because their back
is all wag wigged out. They can't even pick up
their grandkids without this a weird fatigue and pain. The
person I'm talking about there is a dear friend of
ours who is the female lead of our life group.
She's flying back from Hawaii now, where she just played
four or five rounds of golf. Her back wouldn't allow
that until she went to Renew Healthcare in Portavard in Mexico.
Hands I'm talking about a guy who ran a construction business.
He was a general contractor, but then he had to
have his grandkids and kids do all the work. He
couldn't use his hands. He flew to Renew He got
his hand usage back the next day. Or I can
talk about the marine that my friend zach Abra and
I had got to hang out with when we were
down there. He couldn't go up and downstairs. He went
up and downstairs the week after he got the injections,
and that's before the tissuary building began. This is world
class healthcare unavailable in the United States. And I can
talk to you all the reasons why that's the case.
Go check them out at Renew r E n U
E dot Healthcare. Avoid surgery, recover more quickly from it,
get help for traumatic brain injuries. They can reset your
immune system. It's renewed r E n U E dot Healthcare.
This woman has put herself in a position of defending
the indefensible. She is a protester trying to stop cops
from doing a very specific job. Listen to this ice
officers response record.
Speaker 4: We're here to arrest a child sex offender, and you
guys are out here honky.
Speaker 1: Oh no, we're pressing.
Speaker 4: That vehicle right there is honky and impeding our investigations
while we're trying to arrest a child sex offender. That's
who you guys are protecting.
Speaker 1: Insane guys in the truck now as people walking behind him,
he's having this cover. This is what we're trying to do,
trying to get someone out of your community who intends
this sort of harm to children and they don't care.
If you ever find yourself in this position, understand something.
You have been spiritually captured, you have been mentally captured,
and you're going to ignore things like this. The massive
drop in fentanyl deaths since we began these policies. We
are at six thousand, it's now down to twenty seven
hundred deaths. This is from the US Centers for disease control.
This has been falling since January when these policies began.
Or you ignore things like this, this is a social
media conversation. At least we can finally stop pretending like
you guys don't support violence against your political opponents or
just anyone who disagrees with you. Zorina writes back on
hundred percent support it, baby, you get to die for
Donald Trump, John Pepper, you get to die for Somalians.
Lmfao Sarzina. Yes, now I can respect Sarzina deciding that
she wants to die for Somalians. No greater love has
men lay down his life for a brother, But to
protect fraud, to protect people who mean children. Ill go
defend all the Samolians you want, But then ask yourself
a question, how did I get to the position where
I'm defending Samonians who want to harm kids in that way?
That'd be something to pray about. Story number three. It
is brutally, brutally obvious that God exists and we can
do this super quickly. Let's suicide by side, super quick,
super easy. I'm going to show you something that people
say geniuses design this, and they're right. People with genius
IQs design This thing no argument, and it's so clear
that it's designed by geniuses. Look at it, walk down hills,
This thing walking down hills. There it is walking down
a hill. It's a robot and it's learning to walk
through his little barkets, getting better at it. Still very
very awkward. Now it looks even better at it. Look
at that it's come over the Tesla walking and I
was walking up a hill. It looks stilted, it looks uncomfortable,
looks like it's going to fall over, like you couldknock
it over with a feather. But it's learning. So people
would say, man, that's designed by geniuses. Utter geniuses design that.
Think of the human nature, the human IQ that went
into that designed. But this here, whatich you're about to see,
had no designer, It had no direction. It is simply
the response of billions and billions and billions of years
of random mutations. Oh and by the way, the DNA
that governs it, the language that is DNA that came
about randomly, because as you know, meaningful information books are
written by random all the time. I'm forever walking down
the beach and running into sentences in the sand I'm
forever seeing birds write things accidentally with their talents. Happens
all the time. Look at this and tell me that
you can look at that robot and say that's obviously designed,
and then watch this and say, oh gosh, that's all
random mutations to be a world records one hundred meter dash,
just billions and billions in years of random mutation. The
lungs working, the muscles working, the fast twitches firing, the
ability to focus and win at that level, the smooth movement.
And as this is going on, there's the cognition, there's
the heart rate, there's the respiratory system, there's a regulatory system,
the nervous system, the digestive systems doing what it needs
to do to feed this machine. If you look at
that robot and say, that's clearly the design of a
human genius who designed that? Because the robot was made
by people who were first made. The robot was made
by people who were given the ability to talk and
communicate and hear and write down. The robot was made
by people who couldn't exist without a starting point sperm.
An egg. God exists because only a god could always exist.
A robot, a super intelligence be my guest, tell me
how it was created. Only a God could always exist.
And this is what Aristotle called God, the unmoved Mover.
So if you believe that there was absolutely nothing and
then the Big Bang happens, you have a real important question.
Answer what started the Big Bang? Something? No, you said,
there's nothing, What was this something? Then you need to
get back to who put the something there? And you
get into a problem of infinite regression. God of the Bible,
the God of the Bible, always existed, always will exist,
required no beginning. He stitches together in her mother's womb.
He counted every care in her heads, and he put
into us readable, writeable, shaable, repeatable, falsifiable language called DNA.
And we can sprint, and we can build robots that
one day we'll be able to sprint. But they could
have never got the beginning without the great unmoved Mover.
This is the Todd Herman Shaw. Please go be well,
be strong, be kind, Please make every effort to walk
in the light of Christ.