Speaker 1: This is Gary and Shannon and you're listening to KFI
Speaker 1: A M.
Speaker 2: Six forty, the Gary and Shannon Show on demand on
Speaker 2: the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1: It's time for swamp watch.
Speaker 3: Swamp is horrible.
Speaker 1: The government doesn't work.
Speaker 4: Man to make it like a reality TV show was
Speaker 4: a bad noos.
Speaker 1: Always a pleasure to be anywhere from Washington, DC.
Speaker 2: Hey, Joey, A town hall too, clearly built on a
Speaker 2: swamp and in so many ways still a swamp.
Speaker 1: A batch of malwarkee, he said, drained the swamp. I said, Oh,
Speaker 1: that's so hope, keep wash.
Speaker 2: You know the thing, all right, This Jack Smith filing
Speaker 2: is massive, literally, I mean it's one hundred and sixty
Speaker 2: five pages. It is a document that Jack Smith, a
Speaker 2: special council was basically ordered to put together to try
Speaker 2: to delineate between what was a private act of former
Speaker 2: President Trump he was president at the time after the
Speaker 2: twenty twenty election, and what was an a feal act
Speaker 2: that the president was doing at the time where he
Speaker 2: was fighting back against the results of the twenty twenty election.
Speaker 2: And the difference between the two is the Supreme Court
Speaker 2: judged this summer that those official acts are immune from prosecution.
Speaker 2: But that the private acts might not be immune from prosecution.
Speaker 2: So what Jack Smith had to do was go back
Speaker 2: through his case, get rid of the things that he
Speaker 2: thought were official or that would be official, and then
Speaker 2: try to prove some of the things that he thought
Speaker 2: would be private and therefore could be criminal. As an example,
Speaker 2: he described the conversations between former President Trump and former
Speaker 2: Vice President Mike Pence as candidates talking to each other,
Speaker 2: as opposed to either one of them doing the official
Speaker 2: duties of their office. So that's why he included some
Speaker 2: of those things in this new filing one hundred and
Speaker 2: sixty five pages. A requirement of the court that he
Speaker 2: put this thing together, but it is not a requirement
Speaker 2: that the judge release it.
Speaker 1: That's an important thing. A couple takeaways.
Speaker 2: Again, not a lot of great new information or specific,
Speaker 2: you know, earth shattering new stuff that came out of it.
Speaker 2: Just kind of fleshed out some of the details that
Speaker 2: we had already known about. One of the cases. A
Speaker 2: scene from November fourth at a center in Detroit. A
Speaker 2: colleague of a Trump campaign official, not Trump, a colleague
Speaker 2: of a Trump campaign official, and an alleged co conspiracor
Speaker 2: sorry co conspirator said that a batch of votes that
Speaker 2: heavily favored Joe Biden was apparently correct, and they were
Speaker 2: discussing about whether or not they were going to go
Speaker 2: in and file court challenges to this. This colleague suggested
Speaker 2: such things could lead to a repeat of the so
Speaker 2: called Brooks Brothers riot, which was a scene down in
Speaker 2: South Florida in the two thous presidential election, which was close.
Speaker 2: Of course, the Trump campaign official and co conspiracy co
Speaker 2: conspirator It's Hard allegedly said, make them riot, do it.
Speaker 2: Another takeaway, Trump didn't seem to be concerned that Mike
Speaker 2: Pence was a potential target as people broke into the
Speaker 2: Capitol on January sixth, and when an advisor told him
Speaker 2: there's a riot, there are people going inside the Capitol buildings.
Speaker 2: Someone's gotten into the Capitol, and that Mike Pence was
Speaker 2: taken out by Secret Service. Taken away, I should say
Speaker 2: by secret service, He said.
Speaker 1: So what.
Speaker 2: Allegedly more evidence that Trump had nothing include statements from advisors,
Speaker 2: White House officials, other lawyers who had said to him,
Speaker 2: this is not going to go any war anywhere, and
Speaker 2: at that point that they had already lost tens of
Speaker 2: court cases somewhere in the nature of thirty court cases,
Speaker 2: and that he said he still had to fight. And
Speaker 2: then finally the quote that they say kind of sums
Speaker 2: it up, which is he told a family member or
Speaker 2: family members a board Marine one, it doesn't matter if
Speaker 2: you want or lost the election, you still have to fight.
Speaker 1: Like hell.
Speaker 2: The best writing that I saw on this, there are a
Speaker 2: lot of different stuff that's been written about this so far,
Speaker 2: breathlessly saying that this is new information. I didn't find
Speaker 2: anything in there that was necessarily new. The idea, though,
Speaker 2: that we the public are have a right to a
Speaker 2: speedy trial, doesn't make sense. Jack Smith actually argues that
Speaker 2: the public has a right to speedy trial because of
Speaker 2: the nature of this case. It's a former president, he's
Speaker 2: a candidate. Do we use this information to elect him
Speaker 2: or turn against him however you want to frame this.
Speaker 2: But there's no constitutional right for the people to get
Speaker 2: speedy trial. It's the defendant who has the right to
Speaker 2: a speedy trial. And again I'm not saying this is
Speaker 2: not important. I think this is very important. I have
Speaker 2: the one hundred and sixty five pages right in front
Speaker 2: of me because I want to read through this thing. Myself,
Speaker 2: But the Constitution guarantees a defendant the right to a
Speaker 2: speedy trial, not me if I'm not part of that case.
Speaker 2: As far as the importance of this case, yes, it's
Speaker 2: gravely important. I think it's gravely important. But that's not
Speaker 2: but it's for political reasons that it's gravely important. And
Speaker 2: there's no guarantee that political reasons put pressure on the
Speaker 2: judiciary to get any of this done. According to how
Speaker 2: the judge does this, no matter how she rules on this,
Speaker 2: whether to overcome the immunity claim that the former president
Speaker 2: says he has, it's going to be appealed. So again,
Speaker 2: immunity is one of those issues which federal criminal law
Speaker 2: permits pre trial appeals. You can do this before it
Speaker 2: actually goes to trial. We're years away from this thing
Speaker 2: ever seeing the inside of a courtroom. If ever, so,
Speaker 2: why was this thing released? The judge didn't have to
Speaker 2: She did not have to unseal this, especially when you
Speaker 2: consider not a lot of the stuff in there as new.
Speaker 1: She's not sick, though, is she? You can't stop love?
Speaker 1: Is it? Blossoms and blooms? Doog google?
Speaker 2: Canelia an entire folder we could put together. You don't
Speaker 2: even have to run those through AI and come up
Speaker 2: with come up with her saying full sentences.
Speaker 1: We could do do do do do do. It's a regionalist,
Speaker 1: all right.
Speaker 2: We've been talking about this big filing that came down
Speaker 2: from Jack Smith, a special counsel in the January sixth case.
Speaker 2: And it was a requirement because he had to be
Speaker 2: able to go through and parse which actions he was
Speaker 2: accusing the former president of which ones were would have
Speaker 2: fallen under our official business. Therefore he would be immune
Speaker 2: from prosecution and those things which were private acts, which
Speaker 2: could mean that he could be.
Speaker 1: Put up for prosecution.
Speaker 2: And I was mentioning this piece from Andrew McCarthy, former
Speaker 2: assistant US attorney, who has written not a Trump guy
Speaker 2: at all. In fact, in the piece that he wrote
Speaker 2: in the National Review, he said, I'm not minimizing Trump's activities.
Speaker 2: I've repeatedly said Trump was rightly impeached and should have
Speaker 2: been convicted and disqualified from future office. I've repeatedly argued
Speaker 2: that Republicans were nuts to nominate him, as opposed to
Speaker 2: a more nationally viable candidate who would be up ten points.
Speaker 1: By now against Kamala Harris, on and on and on.
Speaker 2: He said, Yeah, there are some things in this filing
Speaker 2: one hundred and sixty five pages that are bombshells.
Speaker 5: Sorry, we're hearing about there being bombshells, and this thing
Speaker 5: is absolutely true. Some of the stuff that's outlined here
Speaker 5: is appalling. But I think the thing is the country
Speaker 5: already has decided what it thinks about January sixth. That
Speaker 5: doesn't redown to Trump's benefit, But what it means is
Speaker 5: that the country has moved on for four years to
Speaker 5: other things, and the fact is that they have to
Speaker 5: weigh what they think about what January sixth says about
Speaker 5: President Trump's suitability to be in office versus all of
Speaker 5: the dysfunction that they've had to live through for the
Speaker 5: last four years, and then you have to decide and
Speaker 5: weigh all that in vogue.
Speaker 2: So he also says, and this kind of goes to
Speaker 2: what I was saying earlier, which is Jack Smith had
Speaker 2: to put this report together because the way the immunity
Speaker 2: ruling came down from the Supreme Court is they sent
Speaker 2: it back to the judge and said, Okay, you've got
Speaker 2: to have to be able. You're going to have to
Speaker 2: be able to determine which of the acts would have
Speaker 2: been considered official business therefore immune, or private acts not immune.
Speaker 5: And there was no reason to have it brought out
Speaker 5: in public now. In fact, in most cases, a judge
Speaker 5: would be concerned about, for example, poisoning or prejudicing against
Speaker 5: the defendant the jury pool. In most cases, a judge
Speaker 5: would be very concerned that evidence not be broadcast in
Speaker 5: public without the usual due process cautions that go on
Speaker 5: in a trial, about the defendant being presumed innocent, and
Speaker 5: the fact that allegations are not evidence of anything. The
Speaker 5: point of releasing this now can only be to affect
Speaker 5: the election. It doesn't have any there's no legal need
Speaker 5: for it.
Speaker 1: There is some hope.
Speaker 2: So again, that was Andrew McCarthy, former assistant US attorney
Speaker 2: and a writer for National Review, explaining what he was
Speaker 2: thinking about why this was released. Another issue that's come
Speaker 2: up is that Hurricane Helene in the aftermath could potentially
Speaker 2: play a role in the upcoming election, because there's already
Speaker 2: some bubbling resentment. It appears in places like Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee,
Speaker 2: South Carolina, which tend to be blue states anyway, I'm sorry,
Speaker 2: tend to be red states anyway.
Speaker 1: I've screwed that up for years.
Speaker 2: But the pushback against the way the federal government is
Speaker 2: run now. This is not necessarily that it's Democrats who
Speaker 2: are in power right now. It's FEMA in general, and
Speaker 2: FEMA that gets a lot of the blame for things
Speaker 2: that go wrong when they try to bring a giant
Speaker 2: truckload of supplies or thousands of truckloads of supplies to
Speaker 2: an area and can't get into the nooks and crannies
Speaker 2: of the areas that need the most help. We're talking
Speaker 2: about areas where the president will not go President Biden
Speaker 2: simply because there's no infrastructure to maintain a safe way
Speaker 2: for him to go in there without sucking up all
Speaker 2: the resources of local fire and first respet. He is
Speaker 2: in Florida today. He was getting a briefing just about
Speaker 2: an hour ago about what's going on in Florida as
Speaker 2: a result of Hurricane Helen. With the cleanup efforts are there,
Speaker 2: he will move on to Georgia to survey the damage.
Speaker 2: We know that Vice President Harris was also down there
Speaker 2: yesterday and was getting updates on it. But how this
Speaker 2: goes over the next week or so, and how responsive
Speaker 2: and nimble perhaps the FEMA administrators are could have an
Speaker 2: impact on what we go to the polls to decide.
Speaker 2: Coming up in just about a month. We got a
Speaker 2: couple stories here. It's time for terror and the skies
Speaker 2: like zero nier.
Speaker 6: You're glare at the day off, Roger, get off my plane,
Speaker 6: PROGERI Rodgers.
Speaker 1: What's our Victor?
Speaker 7: Victor?
Speaker 4: Enough is enough?
Speaker 7: I haven't had to put these multy pipe snakes on
Speaker 7: his money.
Speaker 1: It's Gary and Shannon's terror in the Skies.
Speaker 2: On k f I follow up from last week, they
Speaker 2: did arrest a couple of people using an airplane to
Speaker 2: smuggle drugs after their plane ran out of fuel and
Speaker 2: had to make a landing down near Oceanside on State
Speaker 2: Road seventy six, But he said the pilot used a
Speaker 2: distress call before making the emergency landing. No traffic because
Speaker 2: it was the middle of the ice two in the morning,
Speaker 2: so neither the pilot nor the passenger was hurt. But
Speaker 2: when they got there, the guy did something suspicious. He
Speaker 2: threw a backpack into the brush, in which officers said
Speaker 2: they found a kilo of cocaine street value one kilo.
Speaker 1: Just an idea, Just give me a.
Speaker 2: Quick idea, Jacob, what do you think is the street
Speaker 2: value of a kilo of cocaine?
Speaker 1: Oh?
Speaker 8: Man, uh, eight hundred dollars, eight hundred dollars, Ritchie, do
Speaker 8: you have any idea what the street value of one
Speaker 8: kilo of cocaine would be?
Speaker 1: Let me text Lindsay Lohan give you say oh no, no, no,
Speaker 1: I need it off the top of your head.
Speaker 2: Okay, I want to say two hundred k two hundred thousand.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Jacob said eight hundred dollars and you said two
Speaker 1: hundred thousand. We have no chill, Deborah, I'm going to
Speaker 1: say fifteen hundred.
Speaker 7: Wow.
Speaker 2: You guys are all way out of the loop when
Speaker 2: it comes to street value on drug produces.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's good. I guess that's a that's a positive thing.
Speaker 2: Yes, seventy thousand dollars is the rough street value of
Speaker 2: one kilo of cocaine?
Speaker 1: Are you serious? Yeah?
Speaker 2: Seventy grand Wow. Police said that this guy also had
Speaker 2: a small amount of cocaine on him. The pilot, a
Speaker 2: twenty one year old, also arrested on charges of illegal
Speaker 2: transportation of narcotics.
Speaker 1: And I guess that was.
Speaker 2: The they found one kilo They're flying in one kilo
Speaker 2: of coke.
Speaker 1: Wait it's that's in one seventy grand for one kilo. Yeah,
Speaker 1: oh man, I'm in the wrong business. The same.
Speaker 7: There is.
Speaker 2: There was another story as well about why you shouldn't
Speaker 2: fall asleep on an airplane and stick your head on
Speaker 2: the window. And it's not because you're going to you know,
Speaker 2: get nerve damage or to the temperature of the window
Speaker 2: or anything like that.
Speaker 1: It's that it's full of germs.
Speaker 2: High touch surfaces like a spot that makes contact with hands,
Speaker 2: whether it's doorknobs in the or the elevator buttons or
Speaker 2: something like that. They say it's a hot spot for
Speaker 2: transmitting germs in restaurants, public bathrooms, and even those tin
Speaker 2: boxes in the sky. Said basically, you're going to find
Speaker 2: microbes on the high touch surfaces repeatedly touched by multiple individuals.
Speaker 2: Just think of a kid knuckles deep, going after a
Speaker 2: booger and wiping it on the window. Now, the chances
Speaker 2: that you get sick from it pretty slim. If you
Speaker 2: have a microbiome like I do, it's probably going to
Speaker 2: be fight fought off pretty well. But how often do
Speaker 2: you think they actually go through and do a deep clean.
Speaker 1: Not very often.
Speaker 2: I mean, unless you have a biohazardous vomit issue in
Speaker 2: one of these airplanes. They're just going to do a
Speaker 2: quick wipe down, maybe using disinfectant. Between flights. They're just
Speaker 2: going to make sure that you didn't leave your phone
Speaker 2: in that little seat pocket in front of you. The
Speaker 2: final story I wanted to bring you on Terror in
Speaker 2: the Skies is a new project to try to find
Speaker 2: MH three seventy. Remember Malaysia Airlines Flight three seventy disappeared
Speaker 2: March of twenty fourteen, somewhere in the southern Indian Ocean.
Speaker 2: They think, and the question of whether the pilot or
Speaker 2: pilots put it down, whether there was an attack on
Speaker 2: that airplane, it just stopped communicating and flew straight until
Speaker 2: it went off the radar. There's a new guy, Jeff Wise,
Speaker 2: and a pilot science journalist says he's launching a new
Speaker 2: experiment that might hold the key to where the plane
Speaker 2: may have crashed. What he's going to do is put
Speaker 2: a replica of a piece of debris in the likely
Speaker 2: crash site and then monitor marine growth on that piece.
Speaker 1: He said.
Speaker 2: A lot of other plane crashes are a lot more straightforward.
Speaker 2: He said, this is similar to Air France flight four
Speaker 2: forty seven, which went down in the Atlantic and it
Speaker 2: was only recovered a couple of years later. There was
Speaker 2: a report in twenty twelve that concluded the mechanical faults
Speaker 2: the incorrect crew reaction had caused that accident of Air France.
Speaker 2: But in this case, we simply don't know, because we
Speaker 2: can't definitively prove one way or the other without that
Speaker 2: recording equipment, the cockpit voice recorder and the black box
Speaker 2: that records instrumentation, what the pilots are doing mechanically, that
Speaker 2: sort of thing.
Speaker 1: They said.
Speaker 2: The most prominent of many theories right now is that
Speaker 2: this was caused by a murder or a murder suicide,
Speaker 2: or something carried out by one or both of the
Speaker 2: plane's pilot. In that the plane's tracking devices were switched
Speaker 2: off in the cockpit, which leads a lot of authorities
Speaker 2: to believe that someone had deliberately disabled them to lead
Speaker 2: the plane off course. But if they can find the
Speaker 2: plane itself or remnants of it, chances are they'd be
Speaker 2: able to find those recording devices and that could potentially shed.
Speaker 1: Some light on exactly what happened.
Speaker 7: Now.
Speaker 2: The pilot, if you remember, was a fifty three year
Speaker 2: old guy more than eighteen thousand flying hours, one of
Speaker 2: the most senior captains at Malaysia Airlines. He joined Malaysia
Speaker 2: Airlines back in nineteen eighty three. The first officer was
Speaker 2: a twenty seven year old guy who was on a
Speaker 2: training flight. This was his last training flight before he
Speaker 2: was set to go under a test and become a
Speaker 2: fully certified pilot. He had joined the airline in two
Speaker 2: thousand and seven, had a pretty good record with twenty
Speaker 2: seven hundred hours of flight experience, but at this point still.
Speaker 1: No word exactly what did it.
Speaker 2: Two hundred and twenty seven passengers twelve crew aboard presumed
Speaker 2: to have lost their lives when it encountered problems and
Speaker 2: then encountered the ocean.
Speaker 1: That's the way it happens, all right.
Speaker 2: Tracking your partner playing that reading that article The Dark
Speaker 2: Side of tracking your partner's mobile phone a couple of
Speaker 2: great backs. If you've done this and maybe found out
Speaker 2: something that you didn't want to, or you do it
Speaker 2: just because you like to know where that person is,
Speaker 2: let me know on the talkback feature on the iHeart
Speaker 2: app and we'll get into that. I was reading to
Speaker 2: you from that article about the dark side of tracking
Speaker 2: your partner's mobile phone is does loving somebody mean you
Speaker 2: need to know everything about them, specifically their geography, at
Speaker 2: all hours of the day. And the basic conclusion that
Speaker 2: this article comes to is that it depends on the
Speaker 2: health overall health of your relationship if this is good
Speaker 2: or bad. I mean, there are times when you can
Speaker 2: tell when your spouse is coming home and basically guess
Speaker 2: as to how much time you have left to I
Speaker 2: don't know, put potatoes in the I don't know what
Speaker 2: do you do with potatoes?
Speaker 1: Do you cook them?
Speaker 2: Or what time you're going to clean up, or what
Speaker 2: time you got to get your girlfriend out of the
Speaker 2: house before your wife comes home, whatever it is. There's
Speaker 2: plenty of different reasons why people track their partners, and
Speaker 2: we were asking for your information about it, whether it's
Speaker 2: worked to backfired in some cases. A lot of people
Speaker 2: do feel safe sharing their location with their partners. Others
Speaker 2: just feel like it's a little too controlling, and it
Speaker 2: really depends on the person. It really depends on the
Speaker 2: relationship probably, but sharing your location the way we do now,
Speaker 2: I mean, on find my friends on the iPhone, which
Speaker 2: is the one I have experience with, you can tell
Speaker 2: when people are driving, Like right now, I know exactly
Speaker 2: where my son is eating lunch, or I know if
Speaker 2: my daughter is in the science building or in her apartment,
Speaker 2: or if my wife has made it to her parents'
Speaker 2: house yet. I mean, I can tell you all those things.
Speaker 2: I could even tell you the road where they're driving
Speaker 2: in some cases, and that might be a little too
Speaker 2: much information, I suppose.
Speaker 4: Hey Gary, uh, think about the tracking your spouse. You know,
Speaker 4: we we all tracked each other by my my now
Speaker 4: ex spouse and our two children, and just all of
Speaker 4: a sudden, my now ex spouse at one time just
Speaker 4: started objecting to being tracked and I thought it was
Speaker 4: odd at the time, And it turns out she was
Speaker 4: cheating on me, So that pretty much explains that one.
Speaker 4: So anyways, for what it's worth. Oh, by the way,
Speaker 4: your bumper music blows?
Speaker 2: Oh no, Jacoba, do you take criticism?
Speaker 1: Well no, I could care less. Oh yeah, all right,
Speaker 1: Well then he could choose. How about this? He could
Speaker 1: choose the bumpers for one whole show. Are you inviting
Speaker 1: him to do that?
Speaker 6: Sure?
Speaker 9: Is he?
Speaker 1: What kind of crapp he sends in?
Speaker 7: Really?
Speaker 2: Because I'll get his email address for you. Shoot him
Speaker 2: an email. Oh boy, you're asking for trouble.
Speaker 10: Hey Gary, Shannon, Yeah, No, I mean I don't. I
Speaker 10: don't have a partner.
Speaker 3: I track.
Speaker 10: But you know, we all my family and I show
Speaker 10: our location and my brother in law and all that.
Speaker 10: So it's nice in the sense of knowing that where
Speaker 10: we're going to we're getting too safe because some of
Speaker 10: us travel for including me, you know, driving a company vehicle,
Speaker 10: you know, so on and so forth.
Speaker 11: So it's just nice knowing we're safe and we're good.
Speaker 2: Yeah, travel is one of those things. If you do
Speaker 2: travel a lot, it's nice to know. Nice to have
Speaker 2: an idea at least maybe what city your friend is
Speaker 2: in or you're tracking my.
Speaker 1: Wife, Yes, has saved my marriage.
Speaker 12: Good period to know what she's going to be whole,
Speaker 12: tells me how long I have to clean up before
Speaker 12: she gets home.
Speaker 1: Very strong idea.
Speaker 12: Hey Gary, hope you're not too lonely without Shannon. We
Speaker 12: all miss her? Or do we just kidding? My wife
Speaker 12: and I do share our location with each other, but
Speaker 12: it's only because of being an earthquake country. We both
Speaker 12: want to know what rubble pile that we'd have to
Speaker 12: go looking under to try to figure out where each
Speaker 12: other are. But then again, the cell network would probably
Speaker 12: go down. So what good is that? Love the show
Speaker 12: I have a good one mate.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that was one of the one of the I
Speaker 2: guess stories that came out of that article that I
Speaker 2: was reading was somebody called the girlfriend because it's two
Speaker 2: in the morning and his phone was dying. He couldn't
Speaker 2: describe his exact location because there were no street lights
Speaker 2: and no houses. He was in the middle of nowhere,
Speaker 2: somewhere in northern California. She was able to track his
Speaker 2: location and find him in the overturned car in the
Speaker 2: bottom of a ditch somewhere and supposedly saved his life.
Speaker 1: Yes, we share.
Speaker 3: Our locations with our iPhones, and if you drive a tesla,
Speaker 3: you can see where the person is. My husband drives
Speaker 3: a lot, so he's on the road, so I look
Speaker 3: at his app sometimes see if he's on his way
Speaker 3: home and everything's safe. And my daughter, for sure, I
Speaker 3: know exactly where she is all the time. No problem there,
Speaker 3: We just shared it. It's not a big deal.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And like I said, the only people that I
Speaker 2: track are my family, my wife and the two kids.
Speaker 2: And a track is different track almost the word track
Speaker 2: has a connotation to it that means that I'm keeping
Speaker 2: tabs on whereas sometimes I just need to know where
Speaker 2: they are so that if I need to contact them,
Speaker 2: I guess if they have.
Speaker 1: Their phone on them, it doesn't matter where never mind.
Speaker 11: Not necessarily track my partner. But I just discovered what
Speaker 11: three words, so you can find yourself without any numbers
Speaker 11: or addresses, So like dog hotpants, and that's your location.
Speaker 1: Dog hot Pants.
Speaker 2: Yes, there is an app called what three Words, and
Speaker 2: basically you could find any what is it three meter square?
Speaker 2: I think it is in the entire world. You find
Speaker 2: out where you are, and then you can ask what
Speaker 2: three words describe that three meter square anywhere on the globe,
Speaker 2: and then send those three words to somebody who also
Speaker 2: is using what three words, and they'll be able to
Speaker 2: come find you within that square meter, which is pretty crazy.
Speaker 2: That means there's a lot of words out there, I suppose.
Speaker 6: Okay, so my adult cousin you still live with me,
Speaker 6: and I would ask him to tell me when he
Speaker 6: was coming home, just so I didn't feel like somebody
Speaker 6: breaking in my house, and he let me track him.
Speaker 6: But then he ended up working for me and I
Speaker 6: still tracked him because he would lie about where he
Speaker 6: was at on his days off, and then he ended
Speaker 6: up moving out and not paying me the money he owed.
Speaker 7: Me, and I was still track.
Speaker 1: Wow, what a great cousin you have.
Speaker 7: Oh yeah, I heard this on dateline, this man who
Speaker 7: had a girlfriend and a wife. He said that was
Speaker 7: a perfect light. But he tracks them both that way.
Speaker 7: He always knows where is ladies are And thought that
Speaker 7: was kind of pathetic.
Speaker 1: Though kind of thing.
Speaker 9: Hey, Gary, is Elizabeth from Shreveport. You know what, been
Speaker 9: married twenty years and yes, we track each other. My
Speaker 9: husband loves to keep tabs on exactly where I'm at
Speaker 9: and say, if you're at the yogurt place, bring me
Speaker 9: a yogurt, and he just I think it's healthy. What's
Speaker 9: a big deal for a healthy relationship? I think all
Speaker 9: is good if you know where everybody's at.
Speaker 1: Love you, bye, no love you.
Speaker 2: Licensed clinical psychologist Yasmin Saad says that young people are
Speaker 2: especially affected in this world of increasing digital impressions. Estimating
Speaker 2: the issue of location sharing in relationships comes up for
Speaker 2: about eighty to ninety percent of people in their teens, twenties,
Speaker 2: and thirties.
Speaker 1: Jacob, you've got a ways to go.
Speaker 2: Would you ever allow your teenage kid to track their
Speaker 2: boyfriend girlfriend location or have them tracked by a boyfriend girlfriend.
Speaker 2: I think it's a little too soon. I think I
Speaker 2: would advise against that. Yeah, okay, all right, So anyway,
Speaker 2: we will continue one more hour here on The Gary
Speaker 2: and Shannon Show.
Speaker 1: We're going to do from trending stories. We're gonna check
Speaker 1: in with Royal Oaks.
Speaker 2: ABC's legal analyst about this special Council filing from Jack Smith.
Speaker 2: The fullest picture yet in terms of the case against
Speaker 2: Donald Trump. But did we have to see it? Was
Speaker 2: it necessary? Royal will answer some questions and we come back.
Speaker 2: You've been listening to The Gary and Shannon Show. You
Speaker 2: can always hear us live on KFI AM six forty
Speaker 2: nine am to one pm every Monday through Friday, and
Speaker 2: anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.