WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.800 --> 00:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, whiskey coming game, my pain, Honey don't.

2
00:00:11.480 --> 00:00:16.120
<v Speaker 2>From Powerline blog dot com and produced by Ricochet dot Com.

3
00:00:16.800 --> 00:00:21.559
<v Speaker 2>This is the three Whiskey Happy Hour with your bartenders

4
00:00:21.920 --> 00:00:26.519
<v Speaker 2>Steve Hayward, John You and power Lines International Woman of

5
00:00:26.600 --> 00:00:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Mystery Lucretia.

6
00:00:28.839 --> 00:00:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Have you gotta giving? Let that whiskey bloon when you're

7
00:00:33.520 --> 00:00:35.399
<v Speaker 1>been in loud, down and load.

8
00:00:38.600 --> 00:00:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Welcome everybody to this very special edition of the Three

9
00:00:41.600 --> 00:00:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Whiskey Happy Hour because we had to drag Steve in

10
00:00:45.439 --> 00:00:48.119
<v Speaker 3>from his balcony on the first sunny day that he's

11
00:00:48.159 --> 00:00:50.640
<v Speaker 3>seen at his lovely beach home in the last twelve

12
00:00:50.719 --> 00:00:53.799
<v Speaker 3>years or something like that. How long has it been, Steve?

13
00:00:53.840 --> 00:00:54.159
<v Speaker 4>A week?

14
00:00:54.280 --> 00:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>No, No, it's been like six or eight weeks. It's

15
00:00:56.280 --> 00:00:59.119
<v Speaker 1>been foggy. Is the foggiest summer I can remember. And

16
00:00:59.119 --> 00:01:01.799
<v Speaker 1>of course it's all because of either climate change or

17
00:01:01.799 --> 00:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>George W. Bush. I can't decide one of these.

18
00:01:04.040 --> 00:01:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Ge W. Bush, I thought everything was Trump's fault.

19
00:01:07.319 --> 00:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, we're saying you just dated yourself.

20
00:01:13.120 --> 00:01:15.480
<v Speaker 3>And then of course we have with us also John You,

21
00:01:15.680 --> 00:01:21.799
<v Speaker 3>who is similarly lounging near the beach getting ready to

22
00:01:22.359 --> 00:01:29.680
<v Speaker 3>instruct another another cohort of young people into his pragmatism ways?

23
00:01:29.840 --> 00:01:33.799
<v Speaker 4>Is that correct, John, positivist ways? I think you mean,

24
00:01:33.879 --> 00:01:35.319
<v Speaker 4>but yes, I am.

25
00:01:35.480 --> 00:01:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because right, I forget pragmatism is great, except it

26
00:01:39.040 --> 00:01:39.760
<v Speaker 3>just doesn't work.

27
00:01:43.079 --> 00:01:46.319
<v Speaker 4>Pragmatism is I'm not sure what pragmatism is. But I'm

28
00:01:46.359 --> 00:01:51.200
<v Speaker 4>here at the Claremont Institute's program for law school graduates

29
00:01:51.200 --> 00:01:53.400
<v Speaker 4>called the Marshall Program where I play the role of

30
00:01:53.439 --> 00:01:58.120
<v Speaker 4>the loyal opposition, questioning how and I ask you guys

31
00:01:58.159 --> 00:02:01.159
<v Speaker 4>to explain this today later in the podcas cast. How

32
00:02:01.400 --> 00:02:04.480
<v Speaker 4>do judges and courts how are they supposed to use

33
00:02:04.560 --> 00:02:09.000
<v Speaker 4>unwritten natural law when they make decisions? Explicate for me

34
00:02:09.039 --> 00:02:14.120
<v Speaker 4>the differences between JAFFA and work scolia and.

35
00:02:14.120 --> 00:02:16.240
<v Speaker 3>We all do that later. I will come back to that.

36
00:02:16.240 --> 00:02:19.639
<v Speaker 3>That's a promise, John. In the meantime, can I just

37
00:02:19.719 --> 00:02:23.400
<v Speaker 3>say that I'm rooting for terrorists these days? As Taylor

38
00:02:23.479 --> 00:02:27.319
<v Speaker 3>Swift opens her five day thing in London, and I'm

39
00:02:27.360 --> 00:02:30.719
<v Speaker 3>hoping that what happened in Vienna will happen in London

40
00:02:30.759 --> 00:02:34.039
<v Speaker 3>and all of those pathetic Swifties who have absolutely no

41
00:02:34.120 --> 00:02:36.639
<v Speaker 3>taste in music will be disappointed once again.

42
00:02:37.599 --> 00:02:40.719
<v Speaker 4>Oh really, oh man, are you trying to get us

43
00:02:40.759 --> 00:02:44.240
<v Speaker 4>boycotted by every like sixteen year old girl. I mean,

44
00:02:44.280 --> 00:02:47.319
<v Speaker 4>that's our that's our that is our main demographic for

45
00:02:47.360 --> 00:02:48.159
<v Speaker 4>this podcast.

46
00:02:48.439 --> 00:02:52.319
<v Speaker 3>We have sixteen year old girls that we've may very

47
00:02:52.319 --> 00:02:54.479
<v Speaker 3>well might have sixteen year old girls that listen to

48
00:02:54.479 --> 00:02:57.360
<v Speaker 3>this podcast, but I promise you they are not swifties.

49
00:02:58.280 --> 00:03:01.400
<v Speaker 3>I have never met a swiftie with two brains in

50
00:03:01.439 --> 00:03:02.960
<v Speaker 3>their head. I'm just going to leave it at that.

51
00:03:03.599 --> 00:03:09.000
<v Speaker 4>Meins, Can I say that I was actually curious about

52
00:03:09.039 --> 00:03:13.039
<v Speaker 4>this swift y thing, and so a few months ago,

53
00:03:13.479 --> 00:03:16.400
<v Speaker 4>while I was working, I turned my Apple music thing

54
00:03:16.439 --> 00:03:20.840
<v Speaker 4>to play all the Taylor Swift songs in order of popularity,

55
00:03:21.479 --> 00:03:23.520
<v Speaker 4>and I had a hard time telling where like one

56
00:03:23.680 --> 00:03:26.120
<v Speaker 4>ended and a new one started. It seemed like a

57
00:03:26.439 --> 00:03:28.879
<v Speaker 4>whole thing was like a music soundtrack.

58
00:03:30.240 --> 00:03:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and her voice is screech. Oh, well, we've probably

59
00:03:33.560 --> 00:03:36.039
<v Speaker 3>offended enough people. I actually know old people who like

60
00:03:36.080 --> 00:03:37.879
<v Speaker 3>her too, but I think it's just because they're trying

61
00:03:37.919 --> 00:03:40.919
<v Speaker 3>to be, you know, friends with their kids or something

62
00:03:41.000 --> 00:03:41.520
<v Speaker 3>dumb like that.

63
00:03:41.639 --> 00:03:47.199
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, I can't decide if the old term swift

64
00:03:47.240 --> 00:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>boating can be used for this problem or not without

65
00:03:50.080 --> 00:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>getting in trouble.

66
00:03:52.039 --> 00:03:54.319
<v Speaker 3>But I think my favorite meme of all time is

67
00:03:54.479 --> 00:03:56.680
<v Speaker 3>when the girl looks at the auto mechanic and says,

68
00:03:56.719 --> 00:03:59.800
<v Speaker 3>how did you fix that awful screeching noise? I replaced

69
00:03:59.800 --> 00:04:02.719
<v Speaker 3>your CD of Taylor Swift with Genesis.

70
00:04:03.639 --> 00:04:05.439
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard that. That's great.

71
00:04:06.199 --> 00:04:09.400
<v Speaker 4>Now when I when Macretia, I actually do like, I

72
00:04:09.439 --> 00:04:13.000
<v Speaker 4>actually want Taylor Swift to succeed abroad because I love

73
00:04:13.039 --> 00:04:17.920
<v Speaker 4>the idea of Europeans spending their hard earned socialist money

74
00:04:18.000 --> 00:04:20.959
<v Speaker 4>given to them by the government to subsidize an American

75
00:04:21.000 --> 00:04:21.959
<v Speaker 4>export product.

76
00:04:22.199 --> 00:04:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I'm okay with that too. You know. The

77
00:04:25.720 --> 00:04:29.439
<v Speaker 3>problem really is is that there's something about the whole

78
00:04:29.439 --> 00:04:32.120
<v Speaker 3>Taylor Swift phenomenon that reminds me a little bit of

79
00:04:32.120 --> 00:04:36.879
<v Speaker 3>the Kamala Harris phenomenon. Excuse me, the Kamalamaedingdong phenomenon. Yeah.

80
00:04:36.920 --> 00:04:45.079
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely that in this age of constant communication, electronic communication,

81
00:04:45.240 --> 00:04:48.439
<v Speaker 3>That's the way I'll put it with you know, social media,

82
00:04:49.240 --> 00:04:53.600
<v Speaker 3>everybody on their phones, everything happening moment by moment. You know,

83
00:04:54.000 --> 00:04:58.000
<v Speaker 3>remember the days that when the Jay Treaty was being

84
00:04:58.480 --> 00:05:01.959
<v Speaker 3>negotiated and it took how many months for news of

85
00:05:02.000 --> 00:05:04.360
<v Speaker 3>that to get back to the United States. Oh do

86
00:05:04.439 --> 00:05:07.560
<v Speaker 3>I wish for those days again, but anyway, or even

87
00:05:07.639 --> 00:05:10.279
<v Speaker 3>June teenth. You know, the reason that they celebrate that

88
00:05:10.439 --> 00:05:16.879
<v Speaker 3>dumb holiday is because communications were so poor they even

89
00:05:16.920 --> 00:05:21.279
<v Speaker 3>though the Emancipation Proclamation had been passed in January first,

90
00:05:21.560 --> 00:05:25.560
<v Speaker 3>they didn't hear about it until June nineteenth. So anyway,

91
00:05:26.120 --> 00:05:30.560
<v Speaker 3>But that being said, Taylor Swift is a phenomenon because

92
00:05:30.600 --> 00:05:35.439
<v Speaker 3>she's a phenomenon, not because she's so incredibly talented at

93
00:05:35.600 --> 00:05:38.720
<v Speaker 3>singing or dancing. They have a showman, I'll give you that,

94
00:05:38.839 --> 00:05:41.079
<v Speaker 3>but no better than a whole lot of people out there.

95
00:05:42.360 --> 00:05:45.800
<v Speaker 3>She's a phenomenon because she's a phenomenon. I actually get

96
00:05:45.920 --> 00:05:49.720
<v Speaker 3>from my hotel memberships, you know, Hilton, this and that.

97
00:05:50.079 --> 00:05:53.079
<v Speaker 3>I got one from the Marriott saying I should enter

98
00:05:53.120 --> 00:05:55.720
<v Speaker 3>this contest by getting their credit card and I might

99
00:05:55.800 --> 00:05:59.720
<v Speaker 3>get a free hotel to stay at the next Taylor

100
00:05:59.720 --> 00:06:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Swift of contest in somewhere. I didn't pay attention. I

101
00:06:02.720 --> 00:06:05.680
<v Speaker 3>deleted it and discuss But I mean, come on, I

102
00:06:06.040 --> 00:06:07.639
<v Speaker 3>know your audience.

103
00:06:09.600 --> 00:06:12.319
<v Speaker 1>But you're an audience of one. Is the problem, Lucasia,

104
00:06:12.399 --> 00:06:12.639
<v Speaker 1>So you.

105
00:06:12.680 --> 00:06:14.879
<v Speaker 3>Really think that's true? Do you think there are people

106
00:06:14.920 --> 00:06:18.399
<v Speaker 3>out there who would get a credit card to justin

107
00:06:18.560 --> 00:06:21.160
<v Speaker 3>for a chance to stay at a hotel and get

108
00:06:21.199 --> 00:06:21.959
<v Speaker 3>Taylor Swift.

109
00:06:22.480 --> 00:06:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Well you're missing oh yeah, a lot of them. Yeah.

110
00:06:25.839 --> 00:06:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Well also you're missing a huge arbitrage opportunity. I mean,

111
00:06:28.759 --> 00:06:30.399
<v Speaker 1>if you want a credit card, fine, if you got

112
00:06:30.399 --> 00:06:33.319
<v Speaker 1>the room, you then sell to somebody for four times

113
00:06:33.360 --> 00:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the value of it.

114
00:06:34.120 --> 00:06:37.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So anyway it would make me, it would make

115
00:06:37.439 --> 00:06:40.800
<v Speaker 3>me complicit in the whole root in business. I couldn't.

116
00:06:40.959 --> 00:06:43.600
<v Speaker 3>But my point, my point was a serious one, and

117
00:06:43.639 --> 00:06:46.399
<v Speaker 3>that is that I do think because I know John

118
00:06:46.439 --> 00:06:50.279
<v Speaker 3>wants John wants me to convince him. John still wants

119
00:06:50.279 --> 00:06:52.600
<v Speaker 3>me to convince him that everything you're hearing about the

120
00:06:52.639 --> 00:06:56.639
<v Speaker 3>polls in Kamala's favor and her popularity rising what six points?

121
00:06:57.279 --> 00:07:01.639
<v Speaker 3>She used to be the most disfavor politician practically in

122
00:07:01.639 --> 00:07:04.319
<v Speaker 3>the history of the universe, and she's gone up six

123
00:07:04.360 --> 00:07:08.279
<v Speaker 3>points and now she's only at forty five or she's

124
00:07:09.319 --> 00:07:12.000
<v Speaker 3>what did I see? She's at forty five percent approval rating,

125
00:07:12.040 --> 00:07:15.240
<v Speaker 3>which is more than she has ever been and there's

126
00:07:15.279 --> 00:07:20.040
<v Speaker 3>no explanation for it. She's still the same dom cackling

127
00:07:21.199 --> 00:07:25.879
<v Speaker 3>word salad piece of you know what, progressive liberal moron

128
00:07:26.120 --> 00:07:31.079
<v Speaker 3>that she always was. Although did you guys see today.

129
00:07:31.480 --> 00:07:33.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. Steve's got to figure out when he's

130
00:07:33.600 --> 00:07:36.240
<v Speaker 3>actually gonna pose this. But sorry, folks, this is Thursday

131
00:07:36.240 --> 00:07:40.839
<v Speaker 3>because of schedules. Again, today she had a rally with

132
00:07:41.360 --> 00:07:45.560
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of people. Hundreds of people showed up, stood in

133
00:07:45.600 --> 00:07:49.800
<v Speaker 3>line in hot, hot weather to get in, hundreds of people,

134
00:07:50.240 --> 00:07:54.120
<v Speaker 3>and then she introduced Joe Biden and lots of people

135
00:07:54.160 --> 00:07:55.560
<v Speaker 3>walked out while he was talking.

136
00:07:56.360 --> 00:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I heard a little bit of his talk and he

137
00:07:58.040 --> 00:08:00.879
<v Speaker 1>was slurring, and you could bear the understanding he was

138
00:08:00.920 --> 00:08:01.279
<v Speaker 1>so bad.

139
00:08:01.600 --> 00:08:05.519
<v Speaker 4>But okay, he looked terrible too. He really looked and actually,

140
00:08:05.519 --> 00:08:07.519
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if you watch, oh, if you watched it,

141
00:08:07.600 --> 00:08:10.399
<v Speaker 4>when they both came out onto the stage, it was

142
00:08:10.399 --> 00:08:15.199
<v Speaker 4>almost like Kamala ding Dong was holding him, like she

143
00:08:15.399 --> 00:08:17.639
<v Speaker 4>was right next to him the whole time, like they

144
00:08:17.639 --> 00:08:19.920
<v Speaker 4>were going as a unit. I think, so he you know,

145
00:08:19.920 --> 00:08:22.480
<v Speaker 4>what would happen if he fell down? Whereas usually the candidates,

146
00:08:22.519 --> 00:08:25.439
<v Speaker 4>you know, they come and they're kind of spaced out

147
00:08:25.480 --> 00:08:27.680
<v Speaker 4>like runway models. I would think, so you can look

148
00:08:27.680 --> 00:08:28.959
<v Speaker 4>at each one individually.

149
00:08:29.519 --> 00:08:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think he go ahead.

150
00:08:32.159 --> 00:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, I've thought for a while now that the biggest

151
00:08:34.399 --> 00:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>question looming out there is whether Biden is going to

152
00:08:37.039 --> 00:08:39.559
<v Speaker 1>make it all the way to January twenty or even

153
00:08:39.600 --> 00:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to election day as president. And one of the reasons

154
00:08:42.240 --> 00:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>for him not to resign, aside from his pride in

155
00:08:44.320 --> 00:08:47.279
<v Speaker 1>narcissism and all all those things, is that then cammelon

156
00:08:47.320 --> 00:08:51.399
<v Speaker 1>It becomes president and owns the Biden record, which right

157
00:08:51.440 --> 00:08:54.639
<v Speaker 1>now she's trying to disassociate herself from, which is amazing

158
00:08:54.639 --> 00:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to me. It's like she's trying to put distance. By

159
00:08:57.080 --> 00:08:58.919
<v Speaker 1>the way, I mean, you guys understand this, this is

160
00:08:59.039 --> 00:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>almost an inn so to our intelligence. Uh, Kamela is

161
00:09:02.600 --> 00:09:05.679
<v Speaker 1>trying to put distance between herself and Biden, who are

162
00:09:05.720 --> 00:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>also being told is the greatest president since George Washington,

163
00:09:09.039 --> 00:09:12.279
<v Speaker 1>the most successful president of modern times. Why would you

164
00:09:12.320 --> 00:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>need to be putting distance between yourself and that person

165
00:09:15.360 --> 00:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>if you're seriously going to say something that self evidently stupid.

166
00:09:20.600 --> 00:09:23.600
<v Speaker 4>There was no distance today. So that today was supposed

167
00:09:23.600 --> 00:09:27.080
<v Speaker 4>to be some big speech right about economic policy, right,

168
00:09:27.159 --> 00:09:31.279
<v Speaker 4>and what was it? It was, uh, seeking a ban

169
00:09:31.399 --> 00:09:35.080
<v Speaker 4>on price gouging and for food costs, price controls like.

170
00:09:36.519 --> 00:09:41.159
<v Speaker 3>Price gouging on food. Yeah, just absolutely ridiculous. Two things

171
00:09:41.200 --> 00:09:45.120
<v Speaker 3>about that. First, Uh, back to John's comment, John, you

172
00:09:45.159 --> 00:09:49.480
<v Speaker 3>have a lovely mother who is actually older than Biden.

173
00:09:49.600 --> 00:09:55.080
<v Speaker 4>Right, Uh, yeah, I think she is sp how's my

174
00:09:55.159 --> 00:09:56.080
<v Speaker 4>mom comeing to it?

175
00:09:56.559 --> 00:10:00.799
<v Speaker 3>Because you might actually want to, you know, help her

176
00:10:00.840 --> 00:10:05.279
<v Speaker 3>on the stage, right, Not because she's any she's spry.

177
00:10:05.519 --> 00:10:11.240
<v Speaker 3>She's extremely intelligent on top of her game still, but yeah,

178
00:10:11.399 --> 00:10:13.320
<v Speaker 3>eighty one years old is eighty one years old if

179
00:10:13.360 --> 00:10:17.080
<v Speaker 3>you've had how many aneurysms as he had, and so

180
00:10:17.240 --> 00:10:19.679
<v Speaker 3>why are they even bothering to do that? It goes

181
00:10:19.720 --> 00:10:22.720
<v Speaker 3>back to Steve's point, which is they're trying to split

182
00:10:22.759 --> 00:10:25.879
<v Speaker 3>the baby. My only answer to that is these are

183
00:10:25.879 --> 00:10:28.720
<v Speaker 3>the same dumb people who go to Taylor Swift concerts.

184
00:10:28.799 --> 00:10:34.360
<v Speaker 3>They could be convinced of anything. Anybody stupid enough, stupid

185
00:10:34.559 --> 00:10:38.320
<v Speaker 3>enough to vote for a Democrat would be stupid enough

186
00:10:38.360 --> 00:10:41.879
<v Speaker 3>to buy exactly that argument. I don't know how else

187
00:10:41.919 --> 00:10:45.360
<v Speaker 3>to say it. So they have nothing, nothing, supposedly if

188
00:10:45.360 --> 00:10:50.759
<v Speaker 3>you believe the polls. Nothing None of their gas lighting,

189
00:10:50.840 --> 00:10:53.919
<v Speaker 3>none of their hypocrisy. You know, none of that has

190
00:10:54.559 --> 00:10:58.840
<v Speaker 3>hurt Kamala one bit. She just keeps rising and rising,

191
00:10:58.879 --> 00:11:01.480
<v Speaker 3>and she's going to go to the stars in popularity

192
00:11:01.559 --> 00:11:02.399
<v Speaker 3>before we know it.

193
00:11:02.559 --> 00:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, by the way, I mean all this, all this

194
00:11:04.320 --> 00:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>gas lighting explains why she's reversed her position on fracking

195
00:11:07.759 --> 00:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>for natural gas because she needs a lot of it

196
00:11:09.759 --> 00:11:12.279
<v Speaker 1>to pull this off. I don't think she can do it.

197
00:11:12.360 --> 00:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>That was a joke. By the way, you guys are

198
00:11:14.080 --> 00:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>got it.

199
00:11:14.679 --> 00:11:15.480
<v Speaker 3>It took me a second.

200
00:11:16.080 --> 00:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>God, Okay, we need a lot of gas.

201
00:11:19.240 --> 00:11:20.000
<v Speaker 3>For the gas light.

202
00:11:20.440 --> 00:11:22.480
<v Speaker 4>Yes, you're trying to say something like that.

203
00:11:22.600 --> 00:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, right, do.

204
00:11:24.039 --> 00:11:26.200
<v Speaker 3>They use natural gas? Okay? Sorry about that. I do

205
00:11:26.320 --> 00:11:29.320
<v Speaker 3>want to ask, so, so Steve had this lovely idea

206
00:11:29.799 --> 00:11:34.519
<v Speaker 3>for us to leave aside, Kamala and the polls and

207
00:11:34.600 --> 00:11:36.679
<v Speaker 3>Trump and all those other things were coming back to it.

208
00:11:36.720 --> 00:11:39.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't care what Steve says. However, you did want

209
00:11:39.200 --> 00:11:42.639
<v Speaker 3>to talk about a few other things, which is appropriate,

210
00:11:43.720 --> 00:11:45.759
<v Speaker 3>But I do want to I want to ask about

211
00:11:45.919 --> 00:11:50.600
<v Speaker 3>the federal Cortapellate ruling against UH in favor of the

212
00:11:50.720 --> 00:11:54.240
<v Speaker 3>lawsuit claiming that the covid Era. Let me get this right,

213
00:11:54.279 --> 00:11:58.600
<v Speaker 3>the covid Era moratorium on paying rent where they just

214
00:11:59.440 --> 00:12:03.000
<v Speaker 3>issued an you don't have to pay your rent anymore?

215
00:12:05.080 --> 00:12:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Was it takings? So I really don't fully understand all that.

216
00:12:08.679 --> 00:12:12.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm leaving it up to you too. Constitutionally, savvy lawyers

217
00:12:12.559 --> 00:12:14.320
<v Speaker 3>to tell me about it.

218
00:12:14.559 --> 00:12:21.120
<v Speaker 4>John, Yes, I was wondering about this too, and it

219
00:12:21.159 --> 00:12:25.559
<v Speaker 4>actually goes back to the New Deal. But remember during COVID,

220
00:12:25.720 --> 00:12:29.600
<v Speaker 4>the government, the federal government and then also some states

221
00:12:29.600 --> 00:12:34.759
<v Speaker 4>and city governments like San Francisco, banned evictions during the

222
00:12:34.799 --> 00:12:38.200
<v Speaker 4>COVID lockdowns, So you could as lucutiae as you're saying,

223
00:12:38.200 --> 00:12:42.159
<v Speaker 4>you could go months. In fact, my brother, I think,

224
00:12:42.759 --> 00:12:45.279
<v Speaker 4>had a tenant who refused to leave for two years,

225
00:12:45.559 --> 00:12:48.759
<v Speaker 4>just stop paying rent and there's nothing as San Francisco

226
00:12:48.879 --> 00:12:52.360
<v Speaker 4>would not provide any legal remedy for some of the

227
00:12:52.720 --> 00:12:55.679
<v Speaker 4>guy just lived in this house for free because of

228
00:12:55.720 --> 00:12:59.559
<v Speaker 4>these lock of the moratorium. So this is interesting because

229
00:13:00.039 --> 00:13:04.159
<v Speaker 4>would have thought, right under you know, the original understanding

230
00:13:04.159 --> 00:13:07.039
<v Speaker 4>of individual rights, there's a contract clause and there's a

231
00:13:07.159 --> 00:13:10.879
<v Speaker 4>property takings clause, would prohibit the government from just saying

232
00:13:10.919 --> 00:13:13.759
<v Speaker 4>someone can live in your house for free for years.

233
00:13:14.639 --> 00:13:20.559
<v Speaker 4>During the New Deal, though, states declared these mortgage holidays

234
00:13:20.840 --> 00:13:24.960
<v Speaker 4>where people wouldn't have to pay their home mortgages during

235
00:13:25.000 --> 00:13:29.879
<v Speaker 4>the Great Depression, and the Supreme Court right eventually upheld those.

236
00:13:29.919 --> 00:13:32.200
<v Speaker 4>It's very controble. First o case, people we don't talk

237
00:13:32.200 --> 00:13:36.039
<v Speaker 4>about anymore. It's called Blaisdel. Yeah, the Playstel case, and

238
00:13:36.039 --> 00:13:38.200
<v Speaker 4>that's what seen is one of the cases that sounded

239
00:13:38.240 --> 00:13:41.320
<v Speaker 4>the death knell for the idea that economic rights are

240
00:13:41.399 --> 00:13:44.320
<v Speaker 4>on the same part as political rights. You know, if

241
00:13:44.320 --> 00:13:47.039
<v Speaker 4>this court, you know, this court has been very friendly

242
00:13:47.080 --> 00:13:50.279
<v Speaker 4>to property rights, this Supreme Court, if they wanted to

243
00:13:51.960 --> 00:13:56.080
<v Speaker 4>give another injection to the reinvigoration of property rights, so

244
00:13:56.120 --> 00:13:57.879
<v Speaker 4>this would be a great case for them to take.

245
00:13:58.440 --> 00:14:01.600
<v Speaker 4>The basic doctrine is h if you're going to have

246
00:14:01.639 --> 00:14:03.679
<v Speaker 4>a takings clause, the Supreme Court has said in the

247
00:14:03.720 --> 00:14:09.000
<v Speaker 4>past that temporarily taking property requires just compensation just as

248
00:14:09.080 --> 00:14:11.960
<v Speaker 4>much as a permanent taking of property. So the logic

249
00:14:12.039 --> 00:14:14.960
<v Speaker 4>of the court below here, this is the Federal Circuit

250
00:14:15.000 --> 00:14:19.279
<v Speaker 4>in DC. It's a special court about takings, and they

251
00:14:19.320 --> 00:14:22.399
<v Speaker 4>basically said, if the government took your apartment, you could

252
00:14:22.399 --> 00:14:26.759
<v Speaker 4>get just compensation. So why should you just get the

253
00:14:26.799 --> 00:14:29.639
<v Speaker 4>same just compensation if the government says people can live

254
00:14:29.679 --> 00:14:31.840
<v Speaker 4>for free in your apartment for two years?

255
00:14:32.159 --> 00:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I mean.

256
00:14:33.840 --> 00:14:36.960
<v Speaker 3>In two years, is no kind of statutory limitation on it.

257
00:14:36.960 --> 00:14:40.759
<v Speaker 3>It's really, I mean, there is no because now, of

258
00:14:40.799 --> 00:14:44.559
<v Speaker 3>course what they do is they claim squatter's rights.

259
00:14:45.000 --> 00:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, right, that's a little bit.

260
00:14:47.960 --> 00:14:50.200
<v Speaker 3>That's different, a little bit. No, I know it's a

261
00:14:50.240 --> 00:14:53.080
<v Speaker 3>different but but there are many people who are actually

262
00:14:53.080 --> 00:14:56.720
<v Speaker 3>claiming squatter's rights based upon the fact that they were

263
00:14:56.759 --> 00:15:00.399
<v Speaker 3>not evicted when they didn't pay their their rents back

264
00:15:00.440 --> 00:15:02.320
<v Speaker 3>in the day, back in COVID.

265
00:15:02.799 --> 00:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but not of them now, John, I haven't read

266
00:15:05.120 --> 00:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the pleadings on this, and I haven't even gotten through

267
00:15:07.840 --> 00:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Ilia Solman's article about it. Reason, but is this a

268
00:15:10.919 --> 00:15:15.519
<v Speaker 1>takings case or is it also U the CDC first

269
00:15:15.559 --> 00:15:18.519
<v Speaker 1>announced this, and really the CDC gets to announce a

270
00:15:18.600 --> 00:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>rent moratorium because they overreach or maybe both. I mean

271
00:15:23.519 --> 00:15:25.559
<v Speaker 1>it could be both. They're not mutually exclusive.

272
00:15:25.679 --> 00:15:29.240
<v Speaker 4>This is how bizarre and circular the Biden administration was.

273
00:15:29.320 --> 00:15:32.879
<v Speaker 4>They said, well, in the end, it turned out that

274
00:15:33.120 --> 00:15:37.159
<v Speaker 4>the moratorium was unconstitutional. Right, So, as you remember two

275
00:15:37.240 --> 00:15:40.679
<v Speaker 4>years ago, the Supreme Court actually struck down this moratorium

276
00:15:41.240 --> 00:15:44.799
<v Speaker 4>and said there's no authority for the federal government. Congress

277
00:15:44.840 --> 00:15:49.440
<v Speaker 4>never gave the agencies any authority to declare nationwide basically

278
00:15:49.480 --> 00:15:53.320
<v Speaker 4>an interruption in every landlord tenant contract in the country.

279
00:15:53.639 --> 00:15:56.080
<v Speaker 4>So the Biden administration, this is how circular they go

280
00:15:56.120 --> 00:15:59.519
<v Speaker 4>in and they say this is not a taking because

281
00:15:59.559 --> 00:16:04.759
<v Speaker 4>we weren't authorized to take the property. Since that was

282
00:16:05.080 --> 00:16:08.360
<v Speaker 4>not an authorized taking, we don't have to pay just compensation,

283
00:16:09.559 --> 00:16:12.600
<v Speaker 4>which actually should make it worse for the government, not better.

284
00:16:13.240 --> 00:16:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean talk about shameless. Well, I don't want

285
00:16:17.320 --> 00:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to get to It's been years since I've read the

286
00:16:19.120 --> 00:16:21.559
<v Speaker 1>Blaisdell case, but I remember that from what nineteen thirty

287
00:16:21.559 --> 00:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>three or thirty four, And as I recalled, John has

288
00:16:24.200 --> 00:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>said Minnesota can cancel essentially didn't say it could outright

289
00:16:28.679 --> 00:16:32.919
<v Speaker 1>cancel mortgage contract. Yes, spend them, but of course once

290
00:16:32.919 --> 00:16:35.279
<v Speaker 1>you did, and there's all this language about, oh, you know,

291
00:16:35.360 --> 00:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>emergencies don't change constitutional rights and limitations, but it sure

292
00:16:40.279 --> 00:16:42.639
<v Speaker 1>blew a big hole in the contracts clause. And it's

293
00:16:42.639 --> 00:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>been often races ever since. Right, and so at the

294
00:16:46.080 --> 00:16:48.639
<v Speaker 1>very least, it seems to me that landlords who are

295
00:16:48.639 --> 00:16:50.759
<v Speaker 1>out of pocket from people who didn't pay rent ought

296
00:16:50.759 --> 00:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to be able to recover if not from I mean,

297
00:16:54.080 --> 00:16:55.919
<v Speaker 1>I got chased down tenant. You may have evicted in

298
00:16:55.919 --> 00:16:56.799
<v Speaker 1>good luck with that.

299
00:16:56.799 --> 00:16:59.360
<v Speaker 4>That is the problem in San Francisco. It's like, right,

300
00:16:59.480 --> 00:17:02.120
<v Speaker 4>these guys didn't pay rent for two years and then

301
00:17:02.120 --> 00:17:05.680
<v Speaker 4>they disappear. Yeah, they might leave the city. Like, how

302
00:17:05.680 --> 00:17:06.680
<v Speaker 4>are you supposed to act?

303
00:17:07.119 --> 00:17:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Right?

304
00:17:07.319 --> 00:17:09.440
<v Speaker 4>You're right, Steve, you could only the Supreme Court has

305
00:17:09.440 --> 00:17:13.039
<v Speaker 4>said when the emergency's over, maybe you should get your

306
00:17:13.079 --> 00:17:16.400
<v Speaker 4>money back. But yeah, yeah, how are you ever going

307
00:17:16.440 --> 00:17:16.920
<v Speaker 4>to collect?

308
00:17:18.480 --> 00:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Good luck with that?

309
00:17:20.599 --> 00:17:23.279
<v Speaker 3>I will say that that all of all but one,

310
00:17:23.480 --> 00:17:26.799
<v Speaker 3>all but one of the cases that Steve suggested that

311
00:17:26.839 --> 00:17:31.079
<v Speaker 3>we discussed today have to do with the mid level

312
00:17:31.759 --> 00:17:36.079
<v Speaker 3>federal appellate courts making good decisions. Another one had to

313
00:17:36.119 --> 00:17:39.559
<v Speaker 3>do with the n error nl RB, the National Labor

314
00:17:39.640 --> 00:17:43.279
<v Speaker 3>Relations Board. Anybody want to come in on that quickly

315
00:17:43.319 --> 00:17:44.759
<v Speaker 3>because I have a point to all of this.

316
00:17:45.039 --> 00:17:46.119
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's talk.

317
00:17:46.000 --> 00:17:48.279
<v Speaker 1>About Well, it's a district court opinion, and I think

318
00:17:48.400 --> 00:17:51.759
<v Speaker 1>John again, I'm just skimmed all this. Someone Actually it's

319
00:17:51.799 --> 00:17:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it's Musk's space X people I think who are challenging

320
00:17:55.079 --> 00:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the National Labor Relations Board. And what they're claiming is is, look,

321
00:17:58.000 --> 00:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it's an executive agency, but the executive prohibited from removing

322
00:18:01.839 --> 00:18:03.759
<v Speaker 1>the members of it. In other words, this is a

323
00:18:03.799 --> 00:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>direct and overdue challenge to Humphy's executor, isn't it, John? Yeah,

324
00:18:08.240 --> 00:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that's right.

325
00:18:08.720 --> 00:18:11.319
<v Speaker 4>I think this. I think the district judge went a

326
00:18:11.359 --> 00:18:14.400
<v Speaker 4>little farther ahead than where the Supreme Court is because

327
00:18:15.519 --> 00:18:18.640
<v Speaker 4>people remember we've talked about these cases on the podcast.

328
00:18:18.920 --> 00:18:23.039
<v Speaker 4>The Roberts Court has been striking down federal agencies that

329
00:18:23.240 --> 00:18:26.799
<v Speaker 4>don't allow the president to remove their heads without you know,

330
00:18:26.839 --> 00:18:30.359
<v Speaker 4>for any reason, at will employment and the most the

331
00:18:30.920 --> 00:18:34.960
<v Speaker 4>last famous one was striking down the protections for the

332
00:18:35.000 --> 00:18:40.720
<v Speaker 4>head of the consumer Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. That's what

333
00:18:40.720 --> 00:18:43.839
<v Speaker 4>it's called. The problem was in that opinion, it's called

334
00:18:43.880 --> 00:18:48.440
<v Speaker 4>Selo law. This is typical Chief Justice Roberts. He puts

335
00:18:48.440 --> 00:18:51.680
<v Speaker 4>in there this language saying, but we're not going to

336
00:18:51.720 --> 00:18:57.799
<v Speaker 4>re examine Humphrey's executor. We're not going to question or

337
00:18:58.039 --> 00:19:01.799
<v Speaker 4>bring into doubt the agency, these these boards and someone

338
00:19:01.799 --> 00:19:04.519
<v Speaker 4>that have been upheld in the past. I don't know

339
00:19:04.559 --> 00:19:07.359
<v Speaker 4>why that would actually write, why would you do that,

340
00:19:07.400 --> 00:19:10.000
<v Speaker 4>but that's what he said. He said, So he basically said,

341
00:19:10.000 --> 00:19:12.440
<v Speaker 4>we're not going to overturn Humphreys executor. We're not going

342
00:19:12.519 --> 00:19:15.319
<v Speaker 4>to re examine all those new Deal agencies, but we

343
00:19:15.359 --> 00:19:18.160
<v Speaker 4>are going to look closely at new you know, new creations,

344
00:19:18.200 --> 00:19:22.279
<v Speaker 4>new creatures. So I think the NLRB probably falls within

345
00:19:22.359 --> 00:19:26.880
<v Speaker 4>that exception that Roberts mentioned in this law case unfortunately.

346
00:19:27.960 --> 00:19:31.400
<v Speaker 3>So remind me though that the the one, the one

347
00:19:31.440 --> 00:19:35.559
<v Speaker 3>of the big defeats during the Obama administration for Obama

348
00:19:35.720 --> 00:19:40.279
<v Speaker 3>was an nl RB case having to do with his

349
00:19:40.359 --> 00:19:45.039
<v Speaker 3>appointment of interim members of the board, right, but I

350
00:19:45.079 --> 00:19:45.920
<v Speaker 3>don't remember.

351
00:19:45.680 --> 00:19:49.000
<v Speaker 4>Yes, a recess appointment. That was a recess appointments case.

352
00:19:49.119 --> 00:19:53.440
<v Speaker 4>That was whether when Congress was at a session, how

353
00:19:53.519 --> 00:19:59.200
<v Speaker 4>many days would Congress not be meeting for Obama to

354
00:19:59.240 --> 00:20:02.160
<v Speaker 4>come in and start up pointing people as what they

355
00:20:02.160 --> 00:20:06.839
<v Speaker 4>called recess appointments, people who could serve basically without having

356
00:20:06.880 --> 00:20:09.799
<v Speaker 4>to undergo advice and consent, even though they normally would

357
00:20:09.839 --> 00:20:12.480
<v Speaker 4>have to. Just because Congress is out of session, they

358
00:20:12.480 --> 00:20:14.880
<v Speaker 4>get to serve for the rest of the congressional term.

359
00:20:15.319 --> 00:20:19.839
<v Speaker 4>And the Supreme Court, yeah, because of President Obama, I think,

360
00:20:20.000 --> 00:20:23.400
<v Speaker 4>basically claimed if Congress was out of session for like

361
00:20:23.440 --> 00:20:26.759
<v Speaker 4>a millisecond, he could do it, right, And the Court said, no, No,

362
00:20:26.799 --> 00:20:29.000
<v Speaker 4>the recess has to be a certain number of days.

363
00:20:30.079 --> 00:20:33.200
<v Speaker 4>And it was a significant defeat for the Obama administration

364
00:20:33.240 --> 00:20:36.039
<v Speaker 4>because it had the effect of invalidating a whole bunch

365
00:20:36.039 --> 00:20:38.759
<v Speaker 4>of NLRB decisions.

366
00:20:39.200 --> 00:20:41.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I mean, let's remember that you know,

367
00:20:41.680 --> 00:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>John Bolton served as you an ambassador for about a

368
00:20:44.200 --> 00:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>year and a half as a recess appointment because a

369
00:20:46.960 --> 00:20:50.759
<v Speaker 1>couple of Republican senators opposed his confirmation. But then the

370
00:20:50.799 --> 00:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>other thing, I mean why this is important is you

371
00:20:53.960 --> 00:20:56.559
<v Speaker 1>may remember this mixes up a story from last week.

372
00:20:57.200 --> 00:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>The NLRB tried to intervene in strong Boeing into not

373
00:21:01.519 --> 00:21:04.759
<v Speaker 1>opening one of their aircraft factories for this seven eighty

374
00:21:04.799 --> 00:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>seven in South Carolina, a non union right to work state,

375
00:21:08.599 --> 00:21:10.319
<v Speaker 1>and they got slapped down I think in court or

376
00:21:10.440 --> 00:21:12.279
<v Speaker 1>had to back down. I forget exactly what happened, but

377
00:21:12.279 --> 00:21:15.079
<v Speaker 1>it was a clear overreach of their own authority, and

378
00:21:15.160 --> 00:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>when questioned on it, Obama said, oh, I have nothing

379
00:21:18.000 --> 00:21:20.799
<v Speaker 1>to do with that. That was the National Labor Relations Sport,

380
00:21:20.880 --> 00:21:23.799
<v Speaker 1>and they're an independent agency. I don't have any control

381
00:21:23.839 --> 00:21:26.599
<v Speaker 1>over them. I mean, I can appoint some new members sometime,

382
00:21:26.680 --> 00:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>but they're beyond my reach. So this is the old

383
00:21:29.680 --> 00:21:32.079
<v Speaker 1>two step that the administrative state has been using from

384
00:21:32.079 --> 00:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, about oh, we have these expert administrators and gosh,

385
00:21:35.480 --> 00:21:37.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm just powerless to do anything about it. And everyone

386
00:21:37.839 --> 00:21:39.319
<v Speaker 1>nods their head and says, oh, I guess we.

387
00:21:39.400 --> 00:21:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Have up with that, and forgive me for calling it recess.

388
00:21:43.400 --> 00:21:46.039
<v Speaker 3>I mean interim instead of recess. If you know anything

389
00:21:46.119 --> 00:21:48.640
<v Speaker 3>about the hell that is my life at my university

390
00:21:48.720 --> 00:21:51.920
<v Speaker 3>right now, everything is an interim. So I'll just leave

391
00:21:51.960 --> 00:21:54.839
<v Speaker 3>that one alone and move on to Unless you had

392
00:21:54.839 --> 00:21:56.559
<v Speaker 3>more to say, John, get you picked up your mic.

393
00:21:58.400 --> 00:22:00.720
<v Speaker 3>They do want to talk just briefly. You're right. There

394
00:22:00.720 --> 00:22:03.640
<v Speaker 3>was a district court decision. This one is a Fifth court,

395
00:22:03.680 --> 00:22:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Fifth Circuit Court decision that says that basically John's completely

396
00:22:07.720 --> 00:22:10.200
<v Speaker 3>wrong about his nonsense when it has to do with

397
00:22:10.759 --> 00:22:16.359
<v Speaker 3>invasions by illegal immigrants at the border. Right, am I

398
00:22:16.400 --> 00:22:22.680
<v Speaker 3>reading that case correctly? United States versus Abbott State war powers?

399
00:22:22.680 --> 00:22:24.160
<v Speaker 3>Do states have warpower? Steve?

400
00:22:25.759 --> 00:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean we'll find out soon. It's

401
00:22:29.440 --> 00:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a practical matter. Sorry to.

402
00:22:33.119 --> 00:22:33.160
<v Speaker 3>I.

403
00:22:33.319 --> 00:22:38.799
<v Speaker 4>You know, this Fifth Circuit case was really not about

404
00:22:38.799 --> 00:22:41.440
<v Speaker 4>the state war powers. There's some mention of it in

405
00:22:41.480 --> 00:22:45.920
<v Speaker 4>the opinions. There's a whole bunch of opinions, but it's

406
00:22:46.920 --> 00:22:49.039
<v Speaker 4>put so a lot of it is just about whether

407
00:22:49.119 --> 00:22:52.920
<v Speaker 4>the federal government has chosen to take over the Rio

408
00:22:53.000 --> 00:22:57.400
<v Speaker 4>Grande River using the environment of using Steve's favorite environmental laws, right,

409
00:22:57.440 --> 00:23:01.559
<v Speaker 4>to yes, right exactly. So do you remember this is

410
00:23:01.559 --> 00:23:06.319
<v Speaker 4>a case where Texas put up those floating barriers along

411
00:23:06.359 --> 00:23:09.079
<v Speaker 4>the Rio grand and then yeah, the buoys, and then

412
00:23:09.119 --> 00:23:15.000
<v Speaker 4>has also deployed state National Guard units to the border,

413
00:23:15.440 --> 00:23:18.440
<v Speaker 4>and the Biden administration is suing saying that this violates

414
00:23:18.440 --> 00:23:24.759
<v Speaker 4>federal control over immigration, and then Texas in part has

415
00:23:24.759 --> 00:23:28.079
<v Speaker 4>claimed they're allowed to do this because this represents an invasion.

416
00:23:29.359 --> 00:23:31.519
<v Speaker 4>And remember when we talked about on the podcast, for

417
00:23:32.119 --> 00:23:36.200
<v Speaker 4>I did not think highly of the Texas argument. The

418
00:23:36.240 --> 00:23:40.400
<v Speaker 4>Texas Texas points to Article one, section ten of the Constitution,

419
00:23:40.440 --> 00:23:44.200
<v Speaker 4>which says that a state cannot engage in war without

420
00:23:44.240 --> 00:23:47.880
<v Speaker 4>the consent of Congress, and then has two exceptions unless

421
00:23:48.000 --> 00:23:52.319
<v Speaker 4>actually invaded or in imminent danger that will not admit

422
00:23:52.359 --> 00:23:56.799
<v Speaker 4>of delay. So I don't first of all, even if

423
00:23:56.799 --> 00:24:00.000
<v Speaker 4>it is, I just don't think it fits those two exceptions.

424
00:24:00.680 --> 00:24:03.279
<v Speaker 4>What's going on in Texas. I don't think it's an

425
00:24:03.279 --> 00:24:06.160
<v Speaker 4>imminent danger because you know, we've got plenty of time

426
00:24:06.240 --> 00:24:09.119
<v Speaker 4>to respond to it. It's just that the United States

427
00:24:09.119 --> 00:24:11.640
<v Speaker 4>government doesn't feel like doing anything about it. But I

428
00:24:11.640 --> 00:24:13.880
<v Speaker 4>don't think this is an imminent It's not like a

429
00:24:13.880 --> 00:24:18.000
<v Speaker 4>surprise attack. Now the other question, is this an actual invasion?

430
00:24:18.720 --> 00:24:18.839
<v Speaker 3>Uh?

431
00:24:19.279 --> 00:24:21.119
<v Speaker 4>You know, my view is that I don't think the

432
00:24:21.160 --> 00:24:24.400
<v Speaker 4>movement of people who are not working on behalf of

433
00:24:24.400 --> 00:24:26.640
<v Speaker 4>a country, you know, not part of the armed forces.

434
00:24:26.640 --> 00:24:29.559
<v Speaker 4>It's just migration of a population. I don't think that's

435
00:24:30.319 --> 00:24:33.880
<v Speaker 4>an invasion. Now there's this article by this fellow who

436
00:24:33.960 --> 00:24:38.400
<v Speaker 4>out there named Natalsen, which makes the opposite claim. We

437
00:24:38.440 --> 00:24:41.319
<v Speaker 4>could get into some interesting arguments about how you should

438
00:24:41.519 --> 00:24:46.680
<v Speaker 4>do originalism properly. So he basically argues the word invasion

439
00:24:47.240 --> 00:24:50.880
<v Speaker 4>used in sort of the popular vernacular of the time

440
00:24:51.000 --> 00:24:54.039
<v Speaker 4>or a political rhetoric. What have referred to could have

441
00:24:54.119 --> 00:25:00.119
<v Speaker 4>referred to aliens. I actually tend to read the words.

442
00:25:00.079 --> 00:25:05.839
<v Speaker 3>The Constitution basic legal from the sky.

443
00:25:07.079 --> 00:25:09.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't know what the eighteenth century thought about

444
00:25:09.480 --> 00:25:16.200
<v Speaker 4>UFOs well, but no, no, But my only point is

445
00:25:16.680 --> 00:25:20.319
<v Speaker 4>I don't I think that the legal phrases in the

446
00:25:20.359 --> 00:25:23.400
<v Speaker 4>Constitution should bear their legal meaning of the time. So

447
00:25:23.440 --> 00:25:25.839
<v Speaker 4>that so the reason this came up is because I,

448
00:25:25.880 --> 00:25:27.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, when I first started baking the career, I

449
00:25:27.480 --> 00:25:29.599
<v Speaker 4>wrote a lot about what does the phrase declare war mean?

450
00:25:30.000 --> 00:25:33.359
<v Speaker 4>It has that this characteristic to it? Does declare war mean?

451
00:25:33.440 --> 00:25:37.240
<v Speaker 4>Have this kind of popular meaning of starting a war

452
00:25:37.960 --> 00:25:41.119
<v Speaker 4>or should we redeclare war to be what did the

453
00:25:41.279 --> 00:25:43.359
<v Speaker 4>legal phrase declare war mean at the time of the

454
00:25:43.400 --> 00:25:46.200
<v Speaker 4>eighteenth century, which to me did not mean start war.

455
00:25:46.240 --> 00:25:49.519
<v Speaker 4>It meant like delivering your complaint about why you're pissed

456
00:25:49.559 --> 00:25:51.960
<v Speaker 4>off at the other country. That was a declaration of war.

457
00:25:52.440 --> 00:25:56.119
<v Speaker 4>So that's the same basic argument here. Does word invasion

458
00:25:56.200 --> 00:25:59.680
<v Speaker 4>in the Constitution mean, like, you know, I like, when

459
00:25:59.720 --> 00:26:03.079
<v Speaker 4>I say Lucretia invaded my personal space, Does that mean

460
00:26:03.119 --> 00:26:06.039
<v Speaker 4>I can wage war on Lucretia? Or does an invasion

461
00:26:06.160 --> 00:26:06.920
<v Speaker 4>mean the.

462
00:26:06.960 --> 00:26:09.759
<v Speaker 3>Legal when I invade the space?

463
00:26:11.480 --> 00:26:13.599
<v Speaker 1>Well? Now, well a whole lot of second. Hold on

464
00:26:13.680 --> 00:26:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a second here, John, Let's you know, since the law

465
00:26:16.200 --> 00:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>schools are fond of hypotheticals, I think it's either Neil

466
00:26:20.400 --> 00:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Ferguson or Douglas Murray or somebody like that who's pointed

467
00:26:23.000 --> 00:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>out that the number of male migrants from the Middle

468
00:26:27.480 --> 00:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>East in Europe now outnumber the combined armed forces of

469
00:26:31.039 --> 00:26:32.839
<v Speaker 1>the European NATO countries.

470
00:26:33.079 --> 00:26:37.960
<v Speaker 3>See, that was going to be exactly my argument.

471
00:26:37.279 --> 00:26:42.559
<v Speaker 4>I look, I bet, I bet the Berkeley Police Department

472
00:26:42.559 --> 00:26:46.440
<v Speaker 4>outnumbers the armed forces of European countries these days. Well,

473
00:26:46.440 --> 00:26:50.440
<v Speaker 4>that's the effective the effective military forces of the Western

474
00:26:50.480 --> 00:26:51.440
<v Speaker 4>Europe these days.

475
00:26:51.480 --> 00:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>But the way it plays out here is uh, and

476
00:26:54.240 --> 00:26:57.519
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to let's see too much hyperbole, but

477
00:26:58.519 --> 00:27:01.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have some evidence that you've had a

478
00:27:01.920 --> 00:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>large number of Chinese nationals across the border. I mean,

479
00:27:04.480 --> 00:27:06.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it's in nintens of thousands, and we have

480
00:27:06.440 --> 00:27:08.079
<v Speaker 1>other you know, we know that because we know we've

481
00:27:08.119 --> 00:27:10.839
<v Speaker 1>arrested somewhere on the terraced watchlets and things like this,

482
00:27:11.319 --> 00:27:13.799
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's pretty clear that the cartel is

483
00:27:13.839 --> 00:27:18.640
<v Speaker 1>influencing all this. So the hypothetical is a lot of us,

484
00:27:18.680 --> 00:27:21.119
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of manpower has come into this country

485
00:27:21.119 --> 00:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>as part of this migrant wave. What if the guns

486
00:27:23.720 --> 00:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>are being smuggled in separately? In other words, as your

487
00:27:26.000 --> 00:27:28.440
<v Speaker 1>argument is, it's not an invasion unless those people are

488
00:27:28.440 --> 00:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>crossing the border with a gun in their hand or

489
00:27:31.039 --> 00:27:33.640
<v Speaker 1>some other weapon. You can see where I'm going with

490
00:27:33.680 --> 00:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>all this is that it's not at all clear to

491
00:27:35.519 --> 00:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>me that you can't. This doesn't satisfy the at least

492
00:27:40.240 --> 00:27:43.519
<v Speaker 1>the vigilance for you know, military threat.

493
00:27:44.240 --> 00:27:46.880
<v Speaker 4>But no, you don't have to. It's not a hypothetical, Steve,

494
00:27:46.920 --> 00:27:48.920
<v Speaker 4>you could say, look, there are all these cartel members

495
00:27:49.000 --> 00:27:52.319
<v Speaker 4>crossing the borders back and forth with guns. But my boys,

496
00:27:52.359 --> 00:27:54.559
<v Speaker 4>I don't they don't work for Mexico, right, They're not.

497
00:27:55.599 --> 00:27:57.680
<v Speaker 4>I think to be an invasion, it has to be

498
00:27:57.880 --> 00:28:00.839
<v Speaker 4>the rep They have to be working for, represent in

499
00:28:00.880 --> 00:28:04.519
<v Speaker 4>the armed forces, or another country, which is different than gangs,

500
00:28:04.720 --> 00:28:08.759
<v Speaker 4>criminal groups and just people moving across. It's not the

501
00:28:08.880 --> 00:28:12.079
<v Speaker 4>violence issue that's to me. That's about an invasion.

502
00:28:13.359 --> 00:28:17.119
<v Speaker 3>Armed But if they are here to invade to establish

503
00:28:17.160 --> 00:28:21.519
<v Speaker 3>Sharia law, I mean, that's probably a stretch. That's why

504
00:28:21.519 --> 00:28:25.359
<v Speaker 3>it's a hypothetical. But it turns out that you know,

505
00:28:25.440 --> 00:28:28.200
<v Speaker 3>that's happening all over the world now they're demanding it

506
00:28:28.319 --> 00:28:31.240
<v Speaker 3>now in Germany because Germany was so stupid as to

507
00:28:31.440 --> 00:28:37.000
<v Speaker 3>allow an unlimited immigration from and so what if it

508
00:28:37.079 --> 00:28:42.559
<v Speaker 3>is in fact an invasion with the intention of overthrowing

509
00:28:42.640 --> 00:28:45.680
<v Speaker 3>our republican form of government and substituting I don't know.

510
00:28:45.680 --> 00:28:48.519
<v Speaker 3>It could be Chinese communism with Steve's example, mind, I

511
00:28:48.519 --> 00:28:51.640
<v Speaker 3>think is a little stronger. But I don't know that

512
00:28:52.640 --> 00:28:57.480
<v Speaker 3>they want to engage in acts of terrorism, invoke enough

513
00:28:57.559 --> 00:28:59.920
<v Speaker 3>terror across the country that they can in fact take

514
00:29:00.079 --> 00:29:03.000
<v Speaker 3>over our institutions of government or replace them. And we

515
00:29:03.119 --> 00:29:04.279
<v Speaker 3>have Sharia law.

516
00:29:04.559 --> 00:29:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean right, I mean I mean a footnote.

517
00:29:06.880 --> 00:29:08.880
<v Speaker 3>To this is we do why should we not be worried?

518
00:29:09.160 --> 00:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, and we have four or five elected Labor Party

519
00:29:12.200 --> 00:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>members of the new Parliament who are Islamic migrants advocating

520
00:29:17.160 --> 00:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>for Sharia law in Britain. So they're already getting and

521
00:29:19.240 --> 00:29:21.559
<v Speaker 1>they run some city councils in a few British cities.

522
00:29:21.599 --> 00:29:25.519
<v Speaker 3>Now and at what point when you add together all

523
00:29:25.599 --> 00:29:29.119
<v Speaker 3>of the evils then brought by first of all, Islam

524
00:29:29.160 --> 00:29:31.039
<v Speaker 3>is the greatest force of evil in the world. I'm

525
00:29:31.039 --> 00:29:32.319
<v Speaker 3>just going to say that. I'm going to say it

526
00:29:32.359 --> 00:29:34.160
<v Speaker 3>every day for the rest of my life till people

527
00:29:34.240 --> 00:29:37.039
<v Speaker 3>actually get the point across. Let's stop with this nonsense

528
00:29:37.039 --> 00:29:41.839
<v Speaker 3>about religious toleration. But if if you add that evil

529
00:29:42.240 --> 00:29:45.000
<v Speaker 3>to Chinese infiltration.

530
00:29:44.440 --> 00:29:47.920
<v Speaker 4>Anyway, So now seventeen year old American girls are not

531
00:29:47.960 --> 00:29:50.759
<v Speaker 4>going to listen to this podcast, and now no Muslims

532
00:29:50.759 --> 00:29:52.079
<v Speaker 4>are going to listen to this podcast.

533
00:29:52.160 --> 00:29:52.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm okay with that.

534
00:29:53.000 --> 00:29:54.920
<v Speaker 4>How did you offend both groups at once?

535
00:29:55.640 --> 00:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>This is amazing.

536
00:29:56.599 --> 00:30:00.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm okay with that until and I do actually, we

537
00:30:00.200 --> 00:30:03.440
<v Speaker 3>know Muslims who are willing to denounce all of the

538
00:30:03.480 --> 00:30:06.160
<v Speaker 3>aspects of Islam that are just truly evil. It wants

539
00:30:06.200 --> 00:30:09.599
<v Speaker 3>to destroy everything that's good. I'm pure and just about

540
00:30:09.599 --> 00:30:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Western civilization. That is its aim. It's stated everywhere.

541
00:30:15.559 --> 00:30:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, that just brings them up, even with the faculty

542
00:30:17.400 --> 00:30:18.359
<v Speaker 1>of Harvard University.

543
00:30:18.400 --> 00:30:22.599
<v Speaker 3>But I'm okay, yeah, but they're But the fortunately, the

544
00:30:22.720 --> 00:30:25.759
<v Speaker 3>difference is that the all of those people are are

545
00:30:25.960 --> 00:30:28.319
<v Speaker 3>bushies that were that I'm not supposed to say on

546
00:30:28.359 --> 00:30:31.640
<v Speaker 3>our family show the Harvard They're they're you know, they're

547
00:30:32.200 --> 00:30:35.720
<v Speaker 3>They're really not dangerous from that point of view. Their propaganda,

548
00:30:35.759 --> 00:30:36.720
<v Speaker 3>of course, is dangerous.

549
00:30:36.759 --> 00:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, anyway, John, we just do a whole bowl

550
00:30:39.039 --> 00:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of spaghetti at you with four or five different things.

551
00:30:41.880 --> 00:30:45.400
<v Speaker 3>So, yes, John, I did have to bring that up.

552
00:30:45.599 --> 00:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>But let me can I follow there?

553
00:30:48.079 --> 00:30:50.440
<v Speaker 4>I think so the point originally that Lucretia was making

554
00:30:50.519 --> 00:30:54.440
<v Speaker 4>was suppose it's a group of people, a lot of people,

555
00:30:54.880 --> 00:30:59.000
<v Speaker 4>and they want to deny the authority of the United States.

556
00:30:59.039 --> 00:31:02.119
<v Speaker 4>They're coming here in order to change our country and

557
00:31:02.200 --> 00:31:07.000
<v Speaker 4>to follow Sharia law or whatever. So again, this is

558
00:31:07.039 --> 00:31:10.400
<v Speaker 4>not an issue of the government can't do anything about it.

559
00:31:10.400 --> 00:31:13.119
<v Speaker 4>It's whether you want the state governments to be allowed

560
00:31:13.519 --> 00:31:14.039
<v Speaker 4>to act.

561
00:31:14.960 --> 00:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>So the federal.

562
00:31:15.599 --> 00:31:19.799
<v Speaker 4>Government I completely has the authority to block whoever it

563
00:31:19.880 --> 00:31:22.720
<v Speaker 4>wants at the border, and it's allowed to block people.

564
00:31:23.359 --> 00:31:25.440
<v Speaker 4>It has the right to block people for their views

565
00:31:25.880 --> 00:31:29.359
<v Speaker 4>from coming into the government. And if it doesn't, then

566
00:31:29.400 --> 00:31:31.880
<v Speaker 4>that's the choice of the federal government. I don't think so.

567
00:31:31.880 --> 00:31:33.799
<v Speaker 4>This is an interesting question. Does a state have this

568
00:31:33.960 --> 00:31:38.880
<v Speaker 4>kind of reserved sovereignty to use some kind of.

569
00:31:38.799 --> 00:31:40.079
<v Speaker 1>Unstated war power.

570
00:31:40.519 --> 00:31:43.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't think talking about Originals, it did, It's sure.

571
00:31:44.119 --> 00:31:47.400
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they do in foreign affairs and national security. No,

572
00:31:47.480 --> 00:31:50.039
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they do with foreign affairs and national security.

573
00:31:50.480 --> 00:31:53.960
<v Speaker 4>I think they gave up when we entered the Union. Ah,

574
00:31:54.079 --> 00:31:56.799
<v Speaker 4>you guys are you guys are the JAFFA guys who

575
00:31:56.839 --> 00:31:59.960
<v Speaker 4>love Lincoln. This is Lincoln's theory. You guys are making

576
00:32:00.119 --> 00:32:01.160
<v Speaker 4>the argument that the.

577
00:32:01.079 --> 00:32:05.920
<v Speaker 3>Confederates did for immigration if they were invading their borders,

578
00:32:06.359 --> 00:32:09.119
<v Speaker 3>if a state was at a border with a foreign country,

579
00:32:09.160 --> 00:32:12.640
<v Speaker 3>they didn't give up their power over immigration.

580
00:32:13.559 --> 00:32:15.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean the basic argument.

581
00:32:15.839 --> 00:32:18.599
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, I think they gave their argument over I think

582
00:32:19.000 --> 00:32:22.440
<v Speaker 4>states gave up their powers over foreign affairs and national security,

583
00:32:22.759 --> 00:32:24.200
<v Speaker 4>which includes border control.

584
00:32:25.039 --> 00:32:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, that would be true if the government were living,

585
00:32:27.400 --> 00:32:30.079
<v Speaker 1>if the federal government national government was living up to

586
00:32:30.160 --> 00:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>its end of the bargain. The chain of logic here,

587
00:32:33.039 --> 00:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and it gets back to the challenge you offered at

588
00:32:34.759 --> 00:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the beginning. Is the purpose of government's or instituted to

589
00:32:39.039 --> 00:32:42.079
<v Speaker 1>secure our rights. And when government fails to do that,

590
00:32:42.240 --> 00:32:44.359
<v Speaker 1>it is the right of the people to alter or

591
00:32:44.359 --> 00:32:48.119
<v Speaker 1>abolish that form of government. That's the language of the declaration. Right, Well,

592
00:32:48.160 --> 00:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the government has abandoned its duty to secure our rights.

593
00:32:52.640 --> 00:32:56.720
<v Speaker 3>So but my real point to bring this all together,

594
00:32:56.839 --> 00:32:59.279
<v Speaker 3>with all of the you're gonna love how I did this, Steve,

595
00:32:59.359 --> 00:33:02.319
<v Speaker 3>with all the suggestions that Steve made, we'll get to

596
00:33:02.400 --> 00:33:06.960
<v Speaker 3>John's momentarily, is that we finally get to this this

597
00:33:07.160 --> 00:33:13.319
<v Speaker 3>ruling about UCLA, the ruling that says that, and I

598
00:33:13.359 --> 00:33:15.319
<v Speaker 3>hope I don't get it completely wrong, you know me,

599
00:33:15.440 --> 00:33:20.960
<v Speaker 3>I rush through it. But an injunction against UCLA because

600
00:33:21.000 --> 00:33:29.640
<v Speaker 3>they refuse to stop those prohamas subhuman Pos's protesters from

601
00:33:31.440 --> 00:33:36.880
<v Speaker 3>stopping Jewish students from attaining their education on UCLA's campus

602
00:33:36.920 --> 00:33:38.079
<v Speaker 3>something like that, right.

603
00:33:38.119 --> 00:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they were blocking Jewish students from access to buildings

604
00:33:41.680 --> 00:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and parts of campus.

605
00:33:42.599 --> 00:33:47.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and so there's an injunction. UCLA has appealed that.

606
00:33:47.839 --> 00:33:52.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, the well their argument was that wasn't us

607
00:33:52.119 --> 00:33:54.599
<v Speaker 1>doing this? We have no agency here, It's it is

608
00:33:54.640 --> 00:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>public property. True. But what I like about the judge's

609
00:33:57.799 --> 00:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>ruling is he said, Okay, here's the deal. Uh, if

610
00:34:00.640 --> 00:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't secure the rights of all your students and

611
00:34:03.319 --> 00:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>including your Jewish students or any other religious minority, uh,

612
00:34:07.000 --> 00:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>then you essentially you can't leave things available to anyone.

613
00:34:09.960 --> 00:34:12.199
<v Speaker 1>In other words, it's simply saying is if you allow

614
00:34:12.239 --> 00:34:14.119
<v Speaker 1>a mob to shut down the campus to Jews, you

615
00:34:14.199 --> 00:34:17.280
<v Speaker 1>got to shut it down to everybody. And and and

616
00:34:17.320 --> 00:34:19.119
<v Speaker 1>it's also I mean it was couched a little bit

617
00:34:19.159 --> 00:34:21.639
<v Speaker 1>as a religious liberty opinion. I think, my again, I

618
00:34:21.679 --> 00:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>read quickly also, but I thought, uh, it was a

619
00:34:25.480 --> 00:34:28.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty breathtakingly strong opinion. By the way, John appeals take

620
00:34:28.760 --> 00:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a long time. So this injunction is not stayed pending appeal,

621
00:34:32.519 --> 00:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is it? I don't think No, No, I don't think

622
00:34:35.519 --> 00:34:37.559
<v Speaker 1>so unless the Jidge wanted it to. But I think

623
00:34:37.559 --> 00:34:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it'll go into it goes into a.

624
00:34:39.960 --> 00:34:42.760
<v Speaker 4>Right away, and then the UCLA could go to the

625
00:34:42.840 --> 00:34:46.559
<v Speaker 4>Ninth Circuit and say you have to issue an emergency. Yeah,

626
00:34:46.719 --> 00:34:47.920
<v Speaker 4>stay of the injunction.

627
00:34:48.199 --> 00:34:51.519
<v Speaker 3>But I thought I read that this morning, John.

628
00:34:52.039 --> 00:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't.

629
00:34:52.639 --> 00:34:54.280
<v Speaker 4>I was just looking at the opinion. So the end

630
00:34:54.320 --> 00:34:56.079
<v Speaker 4>of the opinion doesn't have it, but that would be

631
00:34:56.159 --> 00:34:59.280
<v Speaker 4>up to the Ninth Circuit, right. But the Yeah, the

632
00:34:59.360 --> 00:35:03.679
<v Speaker 4>interesting thing is what I was so I what I didn't.

633
00:35:04.079 --> 00:35:06.400
<v Speaker 4>What I was curious about was the application of the

634
00:35:06.440 --> 00:35:08.840
<v Speaker 4>decision to all these other places. Like we're going to

635
00:35:08.880 --> 00:35:12.320
<v Speaker 4>talk about Columbia next, right, So one is I'm not

636
00:35:12.840 --> 00:35:14.639
<v Speaker 4>it's not clear to me that it should only apply

637
00:35:14.719 --> 00:35:17.360
<v Speaker 4>to state schools, because I it would seem to me

638
00:35:17.360 --> 00:35:21.360
<v Speaker 4>it should apply to anybody takes federal funding. You take

639
00:35:21.400 --> 00:35:24.559
<v Speaker 4>federal funds, you're supposed to acknowledge, you know, and obey

640
00:35:24.599 --> 00:35:28.119
<v Speaker 4>the constitution of federal law. And so why doesn't this

641
00:35:28.159 --> 00:35:32.400
<v Speaker 4>apply to Colombia all these other schools that have allowed

642
00:35:32.400 --> 00:35:36.199
<v Speaker 4>these protests to shut down campus and prevent not just

643
00:35:36.280 --> 00:35:38.440
<v Speaker 4>Jewish students but all students from being able to walk

644
00:35:38.480 --> 00:35:40.559
<v Speaker 4>around and go to class and go about their daily

645
00:35:41.039 --> 00:35:42.480
<v Speaker 4>right daily affairs.

646
00:35:42.880 --> 00:35:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, And so you wanted to say something about

647
00:35:45.920 --> 00:35:47.599
<v Speaker 3>Columbia for us, John.

648
00:35:48.760 --> 00:35:52.599
<v Speaker 4>Well, you I remember that when we had when we listened,

649
00:35:52.920 --> 00:35:57.679
<v Speaker 4>I talked about those hearings, the disastrous hearings before Congress,

650
00:35:58.119 --> 00:36:01.920
<v Speaker 4>I called out, I predict that all the presidents who

651
00:36:02.000 --> 00:36:06.400
<v Speaker 4>testified would be gone. So the president of Harvard resigned,

652
00:36:06.880 --> 00:36:10.639
<v Speaker 4>the president of pen resigned, the president of Mit is

653
00:36:10.679 --> 00:36:13.960
<v Speaker 4>still there. But I'll take the latest victim. The president

654
00:36:14.000 --> 00:36:17.880
<v Speaker 4>of Columbia just resigned yesterday. But you know, the interesting

655
00:36:17.920 --> 00:36:21.519
<v Speaker 4>thing is, I'm not so sure that is a victory

656
00:36:21.519 --> 00:36:25.199
<v Speaker 4>for conservatives. I think it's actually liberals who wanted to

657
00:36:25.239 --> 00:36:28.960
<v Speaker 4>oust the president of Columbia. You might recall that I

658
00:36:29.000 --> 00:36:32.639
<v Speaker 4>think hundreds of Columbia faculty called on her to resign

659
00:36:33.039 --> 00:36:35.760
<v Speaker 4>because they thought she was being too tough on the

660
00:36:35.840 --> 00:36:40.079
<v Speaker 4>protesters that you remember she called in the NYPD. I mean,

661
00:36:40.320 --> 00:36:42.719
<v Speaker 4>that doesn't do anything, because guess who's the DA in

662
00:36:42.800 --> 00:36:47.320
<v Speaker 4>charge of prosecuting the people arrested by the NYPD. Alvin Bragg,

663
00:36:47.360 --> 00:36:50.840
<v Speaker 4>the guy who's prosecuting Donald Trump. Apparently he dropped. He

664
00:36:50.920 --> 00:36:54.239
<v Speaker 4>chose not to charge a single one of these protesters

665
00:36:54.320 --> 00:36:57.119
<v Speaker 4>at Columbia, even the ones who weren't Columbia students.

666
00:36:57.480 --> 00:37:00.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah and so again, who vandalized the librarian, so on

667
00:37:00.239 --> 00:37:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and so on? Right, Yeah, well, look, oh sorry, John,

668
00:37:03.360 --> 00:37:04.559
<v Speaker 1>go ahead was that No?

669
00:37:04.559 --> 00:37:08.000
<v Speaker 4>No, So you know, I you know, the interesting question is,

670
00:37:08.199 --> 00:37:10.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, one who would a Columbia or any of

671
00:37:10.760 --> 00:37:14.039
<v Speaker 4>these universities a point? Next, are they going to actually

672
00:37:14.079 --> 00:37:16.599
<v Speaker 4>people be people who stand up for free speech or not?

673
00:37:16.920 --> 00:37:19.320
<v Speaker 4>But then the second question, this is, I know, this

674
00:37:19.360 --> 00:37:23.239
<v Speaker 4>is what Stee's really interested in, is is this actually

675
00:37:23.280 --> 00:37:25.880
<v Speaker 4>going to make things worse this fall? Are we going

676
00:37:25.920 --> 00:37:29.000
<v Speaker 4>to see a shutdown of a lot of campuses, especially

677
00:37:29.000 --> 00:37:31.719
<v Speaker 4>if there's a war, a broader war in the Middle East.

678
00:37:31.760 --> 00:37:36.440
<v Speaker 4>Suppose Israel and Hesbala and southern Lebanon go to war

679
00:37:36.840 --> 00:37:41.079
<v Speaker 4>this fall, that would be much bigger I think excuse

680
00:37:41.119 --> 00:37:44.000
<v Speaker 4>to shut down campuses than the gods of war has been.

681
00:37:44.400 --> 00:37:47.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Look, I mean I think three or four points

682
00:37:47.119 --> 00:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that aren't necessarily directly connected. One is I think this

683
00:37:50.960 --> 00:37:53.280
<v Speaker 1>this whole anti Semitic profo, most mobs are going to

684
00:37:53.320 --> 00:37:55.199
<v Speaker 1>want to pick a few campuses to shut down, and

685
00:37:55.239 --> 00:37:58.639
<v Speaker 1>they'll want to be in media capitals like Columbia, like UCLA.

686
00:37:59.440 --> 00:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll see about Berkeley and some others. But second, I'm

687
00:38:02.960 --> 00:38:06.039
<v Speaker 1>not sure it's correct say that, even if it's strictly

688
00:38:06.119 --> 00:38:08.880
<v Speaker 1>speaking true that the left wanted what's her name Schaffique

689
00:38:08.880 --> 00:38:12.599
<v Speaker 1>out as president. I still think it's a victory for

690
00:38:12.679 --> 00:38:14.599
<v Speaker 1>the forces of good because it's going to have to

691
00:38:14.639 --> 00:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>sober up a lot of people, trustees, most liberal leaning faculty,

692
00:38:18.480 --> 00:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>who realized that the left is out of control and

693
00:38:21.079 --> 00:38:24.360
<v Speaker 1>rampaging and they better do something about it. But also

694
00:38:24.440 --> 00:38:29.159
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, I recall her hearing. She testified

695
00:38:29.320 --> 00:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>after several weeks or maybe months after the after Claudine

696
00:38:33.960 --> 00:38:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Gay and then the woman from Penn were such disasters,

697
00:38:37.280 --> 00:38:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and she was in comparatively better on the whole free

698
00:38:40.360 --> 00:38:44.559
<v Speaker 1>speech and having the deal with protest but comparatively well comparatively,

699
00:38:44.599 --> 00:38:47.119
<v Speaker 1>But there was one moment where I thought you could

700
00:38:47.119 --> 00:38:51.079
<v Speaker 1>actually almost charge her with perjury. One of the Republican

701
00:38:51.119 --> 00:38:54.039
<v Speaker 1>members said, so, I keep reading about these groups to

702
00:38:54.119 --> 00:38:59.239
<v Speaker 1>talk about folks spelled fol x, And he says, what's

703
00:38:59.280 --> 00:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that about. Why do they spell it like that? And

704
00:39:02.039 --> 00:39:04.840
<v Speaker 1>she said, I don't know, maybe they don't know how

705
00:39:04.840 --> 00:39:08.079
<v Speaker 1>to spell. And people kind of laugh. Now the obvious

706
00:39:08.159 --> 00:39:12.360
<v Speaker 1>follow up is she's not unaware of this trend. This

707
00:39:12.480 --> 00:39:15.679
<v Speaker 1>is the sort of identity gender neutrality behind latinks.

708
00:39:16.280 --> 00:39:19.159
<v Speaker 3>You know, I don't get that one either. To be

709
00:39:19.199 --> 00:39:22.000
<v Speaker 3>honest with you, Steve how does how does spelling it

710
00:39:22.000 --> 00:39:24.559
<v Speaker 3>with an X instead of a chaos make it gender neutral?

711
00:39:24.800 --> 00:39:26.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't know, But the point is she

712
00:39:26.880 --> 00:39:29.400
<v Speaker 1>darn well knows what that's all about. And when she said, gosh,

713
00:39:29.440 --> 00:39:31.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what this is about, that was a

714
00:39:31.239 --> 00:39:34.880
<v Speaker 1>lie and I actually wish the next question, but what

715
00:39:34.880 --> 00:39:37.280
<v Speaker 1>about latins? How many people in your faculty use latins?

716
00:39:37.480 --> 00:39:39.639
<v Speaker 1>She said, Oh, I've never heard of that too. You

717
00:39:39.679 --> 00:39:42.440
<v Speaker 1>would have known she was lying. She knows to say

718
00:39:43.119 --> 00:39:45.880
<v Speaker 1>what latins? Yeah, no one knows how you're.

719
00:39:45.760 --> 00:39:48.239
<v Speaker 3>Supposed to say, okay, because I think that sounds kind

720
00:39:48.239 --> 00:39:50.840
<v Speaker 3>of a little bit derogatory. So I'm going to say

721
00:39:50.880 --> 00:39:53.599
<v Speaker 3>that from now on instead of latin X when I

722
00:39:53.639 --> 00:39:54.400
<v Speaker 3>make fun of people.

723
00:39:54.559 --> 00:39:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no one knows what to say. I think LATINX

724
00:39:56.719 --> 00:39:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is easier and mulls off the tongue better, But no one.

725
00:39:58.840 --> 00:40:01.760
<v Speaker 1>There is no authoritative denunciation. And you know, we have

726
00:40:01.800 --> 00:40:05.360
<v Speaker 1>all surveys showing that like ninety percent of Hispanics hate term.

727
00:40:05.920 --> 00:40:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Right, it's okay, still just one quick comment that has

728
00:40:10.400 --> 00:40:13.000
<v Speaker 3>nothing to do with anything. But I think that I

729
00:40:13.039 --> 00:40:19.679
<v Speaker 3>am now getting a dozen a month. Probably that's accurate.

730
00:40:19.719 --> 00:40:22.360
<v Speaker 3>And we're well past the time when you would normally

731
00:40:22.440 --> 00:40:27.039
<v Speaker 3>be sought out by headhunters. A dozen a month offers

732
00:40:27.119 --> 00:40:32.239
<v Speaker 3>to apply personalized ones from headhunters for presidencies. In my case,

733
00:40:32.239 --> 00:40:34.159
<v Speaker 3>they're small. They didn't ask me to apply to the

734
00:40:34.239 --> 00:40:36.280
<v Speaker 3>University of Florida. I'll just tell you that when Ben

735
00:40:36.320 --> 00:40:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Sasse decided to leave, but small but larger for provost

736
00:40:41.480 --> 00:40:44.199
<v Speaker 3>and vice president and that sort of thing. The whole

737
00:40:44.360 --> 00:40:49.760
<v Speaker 3>of higher education senior leadership, for some crazy reason is

738
00:40:49.880 --> 00:40:52.960
<v Speaker 3>imploding on itself. And I'm laughing about it.

739
00:40:52.960 --> 00:40:53.360
<v Speaker 4>It's not.

740
00:40:53.760 --> 00:40:55.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's a lot of different reasons for it.

741
00:40:55.840 --> 00:40:59.840
<v Speaker 3>The fact that most universities, except for ones like Harvard,

742
00:40:59.880 --> 00:41:02.159
<v Speaker 3>and even they are to some extent, are in a

743
00:41:02.159 --> 00:41:05.360
<v Speaker 3>little financial trouble because they got all this money during COVID,

744
00:41:05.400 --> 00:41:09.480
<v Speaker 3>they spent like drunken sailors instead of being very you know,

745
00:41:09.599 --> 00:41:12.760
<v Speaker 3>frugal and wise about their expenditures. And now they're all

746
00:41:12.800 --> 00:41:16.719
<v Speaker 3>in big financial trouble, and that causes all sorts of things.

747
00:41:16.760 --> 00:41:19.599
<v Speaker 3>Because god, you know, if we have to fire some

748
00:41:20.760 --> 00:41:24.239
<v Speaker 3>one of the seventy thousand vice provosts we hired with

749
00:41:24.400 --> 00:41:27.440
<v Speaker 3>COVID money, good will not be terrible. Anyway. That was

750
00:41:27.480 --> 00:41:30.880
<v Speaker 3>just my my, my comment from academia as I'm living

751
00:41:30.920 --> 00:41:34.280
<v Speaker 3>through the pain right now. I'll just leave it at that, John,

752
00:41:34.440 --> 00:41:35.519
<v Speaker 3>Nice to see you back.

753
00:41:36.599 --> 00:41:44.519
<v Speaker 1>John wanted off for lost. No, no, I've been back lost.

754
00:41:45.000 --> 00:41:47.840
<v Speaker 3>So so I do want to talk one more time

755
00:41:48.800 --> 00:41:52.559
<v Speaker 3>with a little bit deeper this idea of can we

756
00:41:52.920 --> 00:41:56.679
<v Speaker 3>should we pay any attention to the fact that if

757
00:41:56.719 --> 00:41:59.239
<v Speaker 3>the washing Post is saying, you know, not only does

758
00:41:59.320 --> 00:42:02.639
<v Speaker 3>Kamma have one path to victory, she has another, and

759
00:42:02.679 --> 00:42:06.920
<v Speaker 3>she's more popular and you know the left, this isn't

760
00:42:07.079 --> 00:42:10.239
<v Speaker 3>just people excited about Kamalama ding Dong. This is a

761
00:42:10.639 --> 00:42:14.039
<v Speaker 3>Kamalama ding Dong movement. I heard somebody say that this

762
00:42:14.159 --> 00:42:17.480
<v Speaker 3>morning on my way to work the polls, I wanted

763
00:42:17.519 --> 00:42:19.920
<v Speaker 3>to mention about poles and this was actually not a

764
00:42:20.000 --> 00:42:23.519
<v Speaker 3>Kamalama ding Dong or Daddy Walt Pole. This was an

765
00:42:23.599 --> 00:42:26.639
<v Speaker 3>Arizona poll asking. It asked me who I was going

766
00:42:26.719 --> 00:42:29.519
<v Speaker 3>to vote for for president, so on on and who

767
00:42:29.599 --> 00:42:32.840
<v Speaker 3>I did vote for. But then it was zeroing in

768
00:42:33.760 --> 00:42:40.519
<v Speaker 3>on my congressional representative. Who is Juan Siscamante a freshman? Okay,

769
00:42:40.559 --> 00:42:45.119
<v Speaker 3>he's not. He went won bi partisan Congressman of the Year.

770
00:42:45.239 --> 00:42:48.000
<v Speaker 3>And the last time I saw Steve. I was so happy,

771
00:42:48.440 --> 00:42:51.159
<v Speaker 3>so happy to tell him your your m Stanton Evan's

772
00:42:51.239 --> 00:42:56.320
<v Speaker 3>joke about bipartisans life. Yeah, he did laugh. He's a

773
00:42:56.400 --> 00:42:59.159
<v Speaker 3>nice enough guy. But anyway, so but but here's what

774
00:42:59.199 --> 00:43:01.360
<v Speaker 3>they did. They asked me who I was going to

775
00:43:01.440 --> 00:43:03.679
<v Speaker 3>vote for, you know, who I voted for last and

776
00:43:03.719 --> 00:43:06.320
<v Speaker 3>all that, the usual kind of stuff. Then it said,

777
00:43:06.320 --> 00:43:09.519
<v Speaker 3>we're going to read you a series of statements of

778
00:43:09.599 --> 00:43:14.400
<v Speaker 3>critics by Juan Siscamanti. And then it was let's see,

779
00:43:14.440 --> 00:43:19.440
<v Speaker 3>he's a Christian nationalist who wants to impose Project twenty

780
00:43:19.480 --> 00:43:24.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty five on the entire help Trump. Does that make

781
00:43:24.039 --> 00:43:26.599
<v Speaker 3>you more or less likely to vote for him? He

782
00:43:26.800 --> 00:43:31.320
<v Speaker 3>wants to start training young children, very young children, in

783
00:43:31.360 --> 00:43:35.880
<v Speaker 3>the use of weapons and violent warfare so that they

784
00:43:35.880 --> 00:43:39.760
<v Speaker 3>can do it. Was just crazy stuff. And then it

785
00:43:39.840 --> 00:43:42.199
<v Speaker 3>was does this make you more or less likely to

786
00:43:43.320 --> 00:43:51.599
<v Speaker 3>vote for to vote for Juan Siscamanti. Juan Siscamanti wants

787
00:43:51.639 --> 00:43:57.159
<v Speaker 3>to make it give women the death penalty if they

788
00:43:57.239 --> 00:44:00.639
<v Speaker 3>choose an abortion. You know, just does this make you

789
00:44:00.679 --> 00:44:05.719
<v Speaker 3>more likely more or less likely to vote for Wan Siscamanti? Okay,

790
00:44:06.000 --> 00:44:08.000
<v Speaker 3>what do you suppose that poll is going to look

791
00:44:08.039 --> 00:44:10.280
<v Speaker 3>like when the results come out, well, we.

792
00:44:10.239 --> 00:44:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Know what your answers are. Yes, No, that's well, that's

793
00:44:13.480 --> 00:44:15.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're doing a couple of things there there.

794
00:44:15.079 --> 00:44:18.239
<v Speaker 1>It's push polling. That's actually they may not be they

795
00:44:18.320 --> 00:44:21.559
<v Speaker 1>might not even be a quote unquote real poll. I mean,

796
00:44:21.559 --> 00:44:23.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they'll have results, but it may be they're

797
00:44:23.679 --> 00:44:25.559
<v Speaker 1>going to call ten or twenty thousand people in the

798
00:44:25.559 --> 00:44:27.559
<v Speaker 1>district and they're going to run those messages and what

799
00:44:27.599 --> 00:44:30.559
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to think, if you're a casual voter, is oh,

800
00:44:30.719 --> 00:44:33.320
<v Speaker 1>he thinks that I don't like him. It's advertising, right,

801
00:44:33.639 --> 00:44:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and they generate some data. They may I'll bet they

802
00:44:37.480 --> 00:44:40.599
<v Speaker 1>have little trips in the thing where a person who says, well,

803
00:44:41.079 --> 00:44:43.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm a weak Biden voter, or you know, I split

804
00:44:43.719 --> 00:44:45.800
<v Speaker 1>my ticket or something that you're be a person of

805
00:44:45.880 --> 00:44:48.719
<v Speaker 1>special interest, and they see which messages are working for

806
00:44:48.800 --> 00:44:51.159
<v Speaker 1>targeting and so forth, and now they have your number

807
00:44:51.360 --> 00:44:53.639
<v Speaker 1>so they will text you the week for the election

808
00:44:53.679 --> 00:44:58.239
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. So there's that's that's polling these days

809
00:44:58.320 --> 00:45:01.440
<v Speaker 1>has gotten very clever that way. Sometimes they're real, sometimes

810
00:45:01.440 --> 00:45:04.960
<v Speaker 1>they're fake, sometimes they're both or not by one of

811
00:45:05.000 --> 00:45:07.199
<v Speaker 1>their campaigns, and it's real news. They'll they'll leak the

812
00:45:07.280 --> 00:45:10.280
<v Speaker 1>results to a newspaper but leave out all those questions. Right,

813
00:45:11.280 --> 00:45:14.159
<v Speaker 1>So it's you know, it's a dirty business.

814
00:45:14.599 --> 00:45:17.000
<v Speaker 4>But despite the you know, the games you can play

815
00:45:17.039 --> 00:45:21.199
<v Speaker 4>with poles and how they're done, they to me you're

816
00:45:21.280 --> 00:45:23.920
<v Speaker 4>reading them, they do seem to reflect that it's undeniable.

817
00:45:23.960 --> 00:45:26.760
<v Speaker 4>I think that that Harris has made up a lot

818
00:45:26.800 --> 00:45:29.320
<v Speaker 4>of ground on Trump. I mean, you know, you can

819
00:45:29.360 --> 00:45:32.280
<v Speaker 4>complain about you can complain about the reasons why, and

820
00:45:32.320 --> 00:45:35.000
<v Speaker 4>the media is all on her side and all the

821
00:45:35.039 --> 00:45:38.320
<v Speaker 4>institutions are on her side. But she has you know,

822
00:45:38.400 --> 00:45:40.519
<v Speaker 4>she is doing better than Biden, and you know, the

823
00:45:40.599 --> 00:45:43.960
<v Speaker 4>polls seem to show it's at least a tie. If

824
00:45:44.000 --> 00:45:46.599
<v Speaker 4>she's not, you know, some Poles say she's slightly ahead

825
00:45:47.280 --> 00:45:51.159
<v Speaker 4>and that Trump is not. Trump doesn't have the same polls,

826
00:45:51.239 --> 00:45:54.119
<v Speaker 4>right show Trump, you know, ahead in all the seven

827
00:45:54.159 --> 00:45:58.199
<v Speaker 4>of the battleground states, and now they show him ahead

828
00:45:58.199 --> 00:46:00.840
<v Speaker 4>I think in just two of the battlegrounds dates. So

829
00:46:01.800 --> 00:46:03.920
<v Speaker 4>we could argue about the well, you know, these issues,

830
00:46:03.960 --> 00:46:06.639
<v Speaker 4>but it's hard to deny that there has been a

831
00:46:06.679 --> 00:46:09.400
<v Speaker 4>swing in the momentum and that I also think that

832
00:46:09.719 --> 00:46:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Trump was the thing, but.

833
00:46:11.960 --> 00:46:13.800
<v Speaker 3>One of the things you said really quickly, because you

834
00:46:13.800 --> 00:46:16.239
<v Speaker 3>have the expertise here, Steve, I don't want I actually

835
00:46:16.239 --> 00:46:18.239
<v Speaker 3>don't want to get in the way of your expertise here.

836
00:46:18.519 --> 00:46:20.880
<v Speaker 3>All I want to mention is I went back and

837
00:46:20.960 --> 00:46:24.800
<v Speaker 3>looked at about ten articles, but from both the right

838
00:46:24.840 --> 00:46:29.599
<v Speaker 3>and the left, sort of leading publications, and almost all

839
00:46:29.679 --> 00:46:33.599
<v Speaker 3>of them were concentrated you said polls. Almost all of

840
00:46:33.679 --> 00:46:35.519
<v Speaker 3>them were concentrated in the first place on the New

841
00:46:35.599 --> 00:46:38.719
<v Speaker 3>York's New York Times, cn.

842
00:46:38.559 --> 00:46:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Poles, New York Times College. Yeah.

843
00:46:41.519 --> 00:46:46.239
<v Speaker 3>So okay, so one poll and then I saw I

844
00:46:46.280 --> 00:46:49.760
<v Speaker 3>think it was Sean somebody who has a little bit

845
00:46:49.760 --> 00:46:53.719
<v Speaker 3>more legitimacy, actually include the Emerson Pole. So you have

846
00:46:53.920 --> 00:46:59.119
<v Speaker 3>two polls telling you this, and they are acting like

847
00:46:59.440 --> 00:47:03.079
<v Speaker 3>it has changed the character of politics for all eternity.

848
00:47:04.719 --> 00:47:06.639
<v Speaker 3>So do you see what I'm saying they're done. I'm

849
00:47:06.639 --> 00:47:10.400
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily disagreeing with anything you just said. I think

850
00:47:10.480 --> 00:47:12.440
<v Speaker 3>that they're taking maybe a little bit of a bump

851
00:47:12.440 --> 00:47:17.280
<v Speaker 3>in the polls and trying to turn it into a

852
00:47:17.320 --> 00:47:20.440
<v Speaker 3>story in and of itself that becomes self fulfilling. Yeah,

853
00:47:20.440 --> 00:47:21.559
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry.

854
00:47:21.639 --> 00:47:23.519
<v Speaker 1>Well, Rush Limball used to say the purpose of a lot

855
00:47:23.519 --> 00:47:27.239
<v Speaker 1>of these polls is to discourage voters, especially Republican voters. Right,

856
00:47:27.519 --> 00:47:29.639
<v Speaker 1>That's why they're on the front page news and so forth.

857
00:47:29.760 --> 00:47:31.599
<v Speaker 1>I think the New York Times Santa poll has actually

858
00:47:31.679 --> 00:47:33.679
<v Speaker 1>been a pretty good one in the last few cycles.

859
00:47:33.719 --> 00:47:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Not perfect. But one more comment about the poll you got,

860
00:47:37.679 --> 00:47:42.079
<v Speaker 1>and it connects to this problem, is that a push poll.

861
00:47:42.119 --> 00:47:43.559
<v Speaker 1>That's what they call out there was a push poll.

862
00:47:43.679 --> 00:47:45.559
<v Speaker 1>Is a lot of people like you. Well you just

863
00:47:45.639 --> 00:47:48.039
<v Speaker 1>told us, did you know, I forget the guy's name.

864
00:47:49.119 --> 00:47:51.159
<v Speaker 1>I've been told you're going to talk to ten people

865
00:47:51.159 --> 00:47:54.159
<v Speaker 1>and tell them that message. See that. That's called of

866
00:47:54.159 --> 00:47:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the network effects of this kind of campaigning. Now, one

867
00:47:57.440 --> 00:48:00.199
<v Speaker 1>thing is I'll put it this.

868
00:48:00.840 --> 00:48:02.599
<v Speaker 3>Okay, wait, wait, just in case you might be right

869
00:48:02.639 --> 00:48:04.920
<v Speaker 3>about that, Steve, to all of our listeners out there,

870
00:48:04.920 --> 00:48:07.079
<v Speaker 3>none of those things about one s ISCA money are true.

871
00:48:07.480 --> 00:48:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Don't vote for the U of a uh environmental lawyer,

872
00:48:14.559 --> 00:48:17.119
<v Speaker 3>vote for wants is CO money. Okay, Sorry to get

873
00:48:17.119 --> 00:48:17.599
<v Speaker 3>that out there.

874
00:48:17.880 --> 00:48:20.599
<v Speaker 1>I figured you probably told the poster, all those upholsters,

875
00:48:20.639 --> 00:48:22.920
<v Speaker 1>all those things made you more likely support him. They

876
00:48:22.960 --> 00:48:24.280
<v Speaker 1>did tell us that, of course.

877
00:48:24.079 --> 00:48:28.719
<v Speaker 3>I did, and I said it was an independent. There's

878
00:48:28.760 --> 00:48:30.360
<v Speaker 3>some things that it doesn't make sense for me to

879
00:48:30.400 --> 00:48:34.000
<v Speaker 3>lie about yeah, because if I am a white woman

880
00:48:34.880 --> 00:48:39.480
<v Speaker 3>that is has an advanced degree. I am. I do

881
00:48:39.519 --> 00:48:44.960
<v Speaker 3>say I'm not married and I have a cat. That's

882
00:48:45.039 --> 00:48:48.920
<v Speaker 3>true the married part. I am married, But uh, you know,

883
00:48:48.960 --> 00:48:51.840
<v Speaker 3>it's hard for me to to to skew their polling

884
00:48:51.920 --> 00:48:54.320
<v Speaker 3>because they'm already everything. They don't expect me to be.

885
00:48:54.440 --> 00:48:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, go ahead, yeah, no, I sometimes a few times

886
00:48:57.360 --> 00:48:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been pulled. I have occasionally lie to screw up

887
00:48:59.480 --> 00:49:01.719
<v Speaker 1>their sample on survey on purpose.

888
00:49:01.800 --> 00:49:05.599
<v Speaker 4>But there's your argument that Trump's actually really ahead by

889
00:49:05.800 --> 00:49:10.400
<v Speaker 4>significant margins. Just no, that's my point about the polls.

890
00:49:10.400 --> 00:49:13.239
<v Speaker 4>I'm not trying to say the wessure really accurate, but

891
00:49:13.280 --> 00:49:15.519
<v Speaker 4>I do think they reflect that the races change and

892
00:49:15.599 --> 00:49:16.159
<v Speaker 4>it is now.

893
00:49:16.119 --> 00:49:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, I do think that's true.

894
00:49:18.360 --> 00:49:20.559
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yeah, so look and then then that's what I

895
00:49:20.639 --> 00:49:23.360
<v Speaker 4>was ccuruous, like, do you think it's because part she's

896
00:49:23.360 --> 00:49:26.079
<v Speaker 4>getting this big boost from the media and the Democrats

897
00:49:26.079 --> 00:49:28.519
<v Speaker 4>are unifying. But Trump seems to be floundering to me,

898
00:49:28.760 --> 00:49:30.920
<v Speaker 4>although he had a really good press conference today where

899
00:49:30.920 --> 00:49:34.159
<v Speaker 4>he was showing household products me which I'm sure he's

900
00:49:34.199 --> 00:49:37.800
<v Speaker 4>never touched in his life. Well, bony detergent and showing

901
00:49:37.800 --> 00:49:39.840
<v Speaker 4>how much the prices have gone up. Do you think

902
00:49:39.920 --> 00:49:42.639
<v Speaker 4>Trump really knows the price of bacon. I mean, come on,

903
00:49:44.079 --> 00:49:46.199
<v Speaker 4>I never shopped in a grocery store in the last

904
00:49:46.280 --> 00:49:47.639
<v Speaker 4>twenty five years.

905
00:49:47.760 --> 00:49:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Here seven bucks a pound.

906
00:49:50.559 --> 00:49:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Here's my field theory, and then I'll explain why it

907
00:49:54.039 --> 00:49:56.840
<v Speaker 1>explains the polling problem. My field theory is it is

908
00:49:56.920 --> 00:50:00.880
<v Speaker 1>metaphysically impossible for Harris to win this election unless it's

909
00:50:00.880 --> 00:50:03.320
<v Speaker 1>short enough and the media cooperates to disguise all of

910
00:50:03.320 --> 00:50:06.159
<v Speaker 1>our vulnerabilities. Remember this is some of the Democratic Party

911
00:50:06.519 --> 00:50:09.880
<v Speaker 1>three years ago rejected so badly she didn't even last

912
00:50:09.880 --> 00:50:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of the first primary. And now they all love her well.

913
00:50:12.360 --> 00:50:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Part of its euphoria that they're out from under the

914
00:50:15.000 --> 00:50:17.840
<v Speaker 1>certain doom of Biden and you know, fresh face, and

915
00:50:18.280 --> 00:50:22.519
<v Speaker 1>so there's excitement and you know, a bubble. But on

916
00:50:22.559 --> 00:50:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the polling business, Lucreasy, you started to mention his name

917
00:50:25.559 --> 00:50:28.360
<v Speaker 1>is Sean Trendy, who really knows these things pretty well,

918
00:50:28.400 --> 00:50:30.679
<v Speaker 1>and I think he was a straight shooting guy. And

919
00:50:30.719 --> 00:50:34.639
<v Speaker 1>he says, look, I think there is among social scientists

920
00:50:34.639 --> 00:50:38.239
<v Speaker 1>an awareness that there are swings in you might say,

921
00:50:38.320 --> 00:50:42.320
<v Speaker 1>voter enthusiasm for talking to posters and answering candidly. And

922
00:50:42.400 --> 00:50:45.960
<v Speaker 1>when Biden was, you know, cratering, the problem was getting

923
00:50:46.039 --> 00:50:49.119
<v Speaker 1>enough Democrats to have a genuine, authentic sample that really

924
00:50:49.199 --> 00:50:52.239
<v Speaker 1>captured opinion completely. Now he thinks it's happening the other

925
00:50:52.239 --> 00:50:55.159
<v Speaker 1>way around. A lot of Republican or Trump sympathetic voters

926
00:50:55.159 --> 00:50:57.599
<v Speaker 1>are not wanting to talk to posters, not telling them

927
00:50:57.639 --> 00:51:00.199
<v Speaker 1>the truth. You remember, you know, the finding I think

928
00:51:00.280 --> 00:51:03.599
<v Speaker 1>Rasmusten had back in twenty sixteen that the polls that

929
00:51:03.679 --> 00:51:06.320
<v Speaker 1>came closest to calling those states in the Upper Midwest

930
00:51:06.320 --> 00:51:08.719
<v Speaker 1>that Trump ended up winning were the ones who thought

931
00:51:08.719 --> 00:51:11.079
<v Speaker 1>to ask who are you voting for? The people would say, Hillary,

932
00:51:11.599 --> 00:51:15.239
<v Speaker 1>who's your neighbor voting for? And when the prints at all,

933
00:51:15.280 --> 00:51:17.159
<v Speaker 1>my neighbor's going to vote for Trump. I'm sure of it.

934
00:51:17.599 --> 00:51:19.559
<v Speaker 1>They said, Ah, a lot of these people are lying

935
00:51:19.599 --> 00:51:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to us. They're actually Trump voters that are not telling

936
00:51:22.559 --> 00:51:25.960
<v Speaker 1>us honestly. Right, there's still that problem. And so I mean,

937
00:51:26.320 --> 00:51:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and then finally, and this is in the chapter Goot

938
00:51:29.480 --> 00:51:33.280
<v Speaker 1>coming out in Michael Walsh's book Next Month that he's edited,

939
00:51:33.280 --> 00:51:35.679
<v Speaker 1>called Against the Corporate Media. I went back to the

940
00:51:35.719 --> 00:51:38.519
<v Speaker 1>work of Tim gross Close the economists that George Mason

941
00:51:38.639 --> 00:51:41.719
<v Speaker 1>used to be at UCLA, and he assembled not only

942
00:51:41.760 --> 00:51:44.079
<v Speaker 1>in his own work, but of several other social scientists

943
00:51:44.159 --> 00:51:48.639
<v Speaker 1>showing that media bias probably gets the left and Democrats

944
00:51:49.079 --> 00:51:51.840
<v Speaker 1>five points worth of public opinion and votes. That's the

945
00:51:51.840 --> 00:51:56.079
<v Speaker 1>handicap against Republicans, and with the media now behaving more

946
00:51:56.119 --> 00:51:59.639
<v Speaker 1>egregiously than ever, I'm not surprised that it's pulled even

947
00:52:00.280 --> 00:52:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I still think Trump has well, let me finish on this,

948
00:52:02.320 --> 00:52:03.840
<v Speaker 1>because I've just got a couple more things to say.

949
00:52:03.920 --> 00:52:07.400
<v Speaker 1>It's that is the evidence for this. By the way,

950
00:52:07.639 --> 00:52:10.239
<v Speaker 1>is Barack Obama in twenty twelve said I'm sure I'd

951
00:52:10.280 --> 00:52:12.039
<v Speaker 1>be eight points further ahead if it were not for

952
00:52:12.119 --> 00:52:16.159
<v Speaker 1>Fox News, just one news outlet that descended right. And

953
00:52:16.239 --> 00:52:19.559
<v Speaker 1>Evan Thomas in two thousand and four said media bias

954
00:52:19.599 --> 00:52:22.360
<v Speaker 1>in favor of Carry and Edwards is probably worth fifteen

955
00:52:22.440 --> 00:52:25.360
<v Speaker 1>points to Democrats. You know, he was the editor of Newsweek,

956
00:52:25.360 --> 00:52:27.519
<v Speaker 1>din or whatever he was. He later said, well, it's

957
00:52:27.559 --> 00:52:30.599
<v Speaker 1>probably only five points. But the point is is that

958
00:52:30.840 --> 00:52:35.079
<v Speaker 1>the unbelievable way the media has reacted to Harris's elevation,

959
00:52:35.679 --> 00:52:37.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it counts for a lot of that bump

960
00:52:37.159 --> 00:52:40.880
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing. But finally, there's no reason to think whether

961
00:52:40.960 --> 00:52:44.159
<v Speaker 1>Trendy is right or not about shy Trump voters. There's

962
00:52:44.199 --> 00:52:48.360
<v Speaker 1>no reason to think that the polls are not once

963
00:52:48.440 --> 00:52:52.559
<v Speaker 1>again underestimating Trump's true support. So if he is, remember

964
00:52:52.599 --> 00:52:54.599
<v Speaker 1>he was like eight points behind Biden in a lot

965
00:52:54.599 --> 00:52:57.199
<v Speaker 1>of places where he was either one or was very

966
00:52:57.280 --> 00:53:00.480
<v Speaker 1>very close. If the polls are even, John, means Trump's

967
00:53:00.519 --> 00:53:03.519
<v Speaker 1>gonna win. So if there's no change between now November,

968
00:53:03.519 --> 00:53:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump's gonna win. Unless another factor comes into play, that

969
00:53:07.320 --> 00:53:10.159
<v Speaker 1>will leave for some other time. But that's why I

970
00:53:10.159 --> 00:53:13.199
<v Speaker 1>think people shouldn't panic about this. Although I can. I

971
00:53:13.239 --> 00:53:15.639
<v Speaker 1>can see you're winning. I mean, you know, metaphysics doesn't

972
00:53:15.639 --> 00:53:17.159
<v Speaker 1>always rule. But I will stop there.

973
00:53:19.039 --> 00:53:20.719
<v Speaker 3>John, what are your thoughts?

974
00:53:22.440 --> 00:53:24.599
<v Speaker 4>I have no more thoughts. I wanted you guys to

975
00:53:24.880 --> 00:53:28.280
<v Speaker 4>explain to me why the polls were so close or what.

976
00:53:28.440 --> 00:53:30.079
<v Speaker 4>And it sounds to me like, do you agree that

977
00:53:30.119 --> 00:53:32.119
<v Speaker 4>it's a fifty to fifty race.

978
00:53:33.199 --> 00:53:35.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't really believe it's a fifty to fifty race.

979
00:53:36.000 --> 00:53:39.880
<v Speaker 3>I really don't. But I also, whatever the race is now,

980
00:53:39.920 --> 00:53:42.719
<v Speaker 3>it will not look like that very soon. The one

981
00:53:42.719 --> 00:53:45.519
<v Speaker 3>thing I wanted to mention when when Steve's talked about

982
00:53:45.519 --> 00:53:49.440
<v Speaker 3>the media. You are you quite rightly, John, say, stop

983
00:53:49.480 --> 00:53:52.199
<v Speaker 3>winding about the media. It's just a fact of the matter,

984
00:53:52.280 --> 00:53:53.800
<v Speaker 3>and there's you know, not a lot you can do

985
00:53:53.920 --> 00:53:56.800
<v Speaker 3>about it. So you don't get to say it doesn't

986
00:53:56.800 --> 00:53:58.840
<v Speaker 3>count because you don't like it. That's basically your point.

987
00:53:58.880 --> 00:54:03.280
<v Speaker 3>You're right. What I will tell you is that we

988
00:54:03.360 --> 00:54:09.840
<v Speaker 3>are not any longer beholden only to Dan Rather Walter Cronkite.

989
00:54:10.519 --> 00:54:13.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, I forget the rest of them. It's been

990
00:54:13.480 --> 00:54:18.440
<v Speaker 3>too long, you know, three network news organizations, and then

991
00:54:19.519 --> 00:54:24.920
<v Speaker 3>all things considered, and what I wanted to bring up

992
00:54:24.960 --> 00:54:27.599
<v Speaker 3>briefly wasn't even on my list because I'd already forgotten.

993
00:54:27.639 --> 00:54:31.519
<v Speaker 3>Too much happening these days. Is Trump's interview with Elon Musk.

994
00:54:32.360 --> 00:54:35.679
<v Speaker 3>If the Democrats aren't panic a little, panicking a little,

995
00:54:35.840 --> 00:54:39.559
<v Speaker 3>why were they so quick to pretend that it was

996
00:54:39.599 --> 00:54:43.960
<v Speaker 3>an unmitigated disaster when in fact it was quite successful.

997
00:54:44.360 --> 00:54:50.440
<v Speaker 3>It was quite successful. It was two successful billionaires. And

998
00:54:50.519 --> 00:54:54.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't think people. I don't think people except for

999
00:54:54.039 --> 00:54:57.480
<v Speaker 3>the worst kind of you know, socialist rats out there.

1000
00:54:57.719 --> 00:55:01.440
<v Speaker 3>People don't really mind rich billionaires who made it on

1001
00:55:01.480 --> 00:55:04.719
<v Speaker 3>their own anymore. They really don't, you know, there's a

1002
00:55:04.719 --> 00:55:08.679
<v Speaker 3>certain amount of admiration for that. Okay, put that aside.

1003
00:55:09.000 --> 00:55:12.519
<v Speaker 3>Despite what that idiot Bill Crystal had to say about it,

1004
00:55:12.559 --> 00:55:14.679
<v Speaker 3>I'll just leave it alone. He came and said that

1005
00:55:14.920 --> 00:55:18.960
<v Speaker 3>it made him I brought out his inner socialist democrat,

1006
00:55:19.320 --> 00:55:22.840
<v Speaker 3>as if it's in or anyway whatever. But not so

1007
00:55:24.360 --> 00:55:27.840
<v Speaker 3>all in all that. I mean, they say, who knows,

1008
00:55:28.000 --> 00:55:31.880
<v Speaker 3>it got a billion impressions, It got seven hundred and

1009
00:55:31.880 --> 00:55:35.559
<v Speaker 3>fifty million listeners from around the world. That's more than

1010
00:55:35.599 --> 00:55:42.280
<v Speaker 3>the people we have here, as you know. But anyway,

1011
00:55:41.679 --> 00:55:47.039
<v Speaker 3>there are ways to reach there are ways to reach voters,

1012
00:55:47.840 --> 00:55:51.360
<v Speaker 3>engaged voters at least that are not you know, the

1013
00:55:51.480 --> 00:55:56.400
<v Speaker 3>View and CBS or NBC or MSNBC Nightly News. And

1014
00:55:56.480 --> 00:55:58.920
<v Speaker 3>I do think that that's a crack in the armor,

1015
00:56:00.079 --> 00:56:02.519
<v Speaker 3>kink in the armor, whatever you say, clink in the armor.

1016
00:56:02.760 --> 00:56:05.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what the thing is. But and that's

1017
00:56:05.320 --> 00:56:09.519
<v Speaker 3>becoming more and more obvious because what you said was true, Steve,

1018
00:56:09.880 --> 00:56:17.320
<v Speaker 3>the media has been So what was the word you used? Coquious? Yes, yeah,

1019
00:56:17.360 --> 00:56:19.559
<v Speaker 3>I mean that wasn't the word, but that's a good one.

1020
00:56:20.079 --> 00:56:22.480
<v Speaker 3>And so what do you guys think do you think

1021
00:56:22.599 --> 00:56:26.920
<v Speaker 3>that new media, but especially Twitter I mean Facebook, even

1022
00:56:26.960 --> 00:56:32.400
<v Speaker 3>though Zuckerberg has found a new admiration for Trump, it's

1023
00:56:32.480 --> 00:56:36.840
<v Speaker 3>still despicable. It's still censoring things. What are the others Instagram,

1024
00:56:36.840 --> 00:56:41.039
<v Speaker 3>et cetera, et cetera. Obviously TikTok is being manipulated by

1025
00:56:41.079 --> 00:56:43.679
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese and the Russians and all those other things.

1026
00:56:43.920 --> 00:56:46.840
<v Speaker 3>But Twitter's out there allowing people to say what they

1027
00:56:46.840 --> 00:56:50.400
<v Speaker 3>want to say for the most part, and so much

1028
00:56:50.440 --> 00:56:53.159
<v Speaker 3>so that poor Elon he's getting sued right and left,

1029
00:56:53.199 --> 00:56:58.840
<v Speaker 3>he's getting he's getting threatened by the EU. So what

1030
00:56:58.840 --> 00:57:00.800
<v Speaker 3>do you guys think about all that? And doesn't matter?

1031
00:57:02.159 --> 00:57:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it matters a lot. Yeah, the old many

1032
00:57:04.719 --> 00:57:07.960
<v Speaker 1>old media monopolies are They've been shattered for quite a

1033
00:57:07.960 --> 00:57:11.239
<v Speaker 1>while now. I think the power of Twitter. You really

1034
00:57:11.280 --> 00:57:13.920
<v Speaker 1>saw it in one particular case here in the last

1035
00:57:13.960 --> 00:57:17.800
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. I forget which organization it was. It had

1036
00:57:17.920 --> 00:57:20.840
<v Speaker 1>raided Kamala Harris, the most liberal senator before she ran

1037
00:57:20.880 --> 00:57:24.239
<v Speaker 1>for president, and they went and scrubbed that from their website. Well,

1038
00:57:24.280 --> 00:57:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it was all over Twitter that they had done that,

1039
00:57:26.639 --> 00:57:29.199
<v Speaker 1>and it was although the mainstream media won't report that,

1040
00:57:29.800 --> 00:57:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that you know, borders are right. Stuff

1041
00:57:32.360 --> 00:57:34.559
<v Speaker 1>was funny too. You know, the social media makes it

1042
00:57:34.599 --> 00:57:38.000
<v Speaker 1>possible to pierce that. And what that means is the

1043
00:57:38.039 --> 00:57:41.559
<v Speaker 1>Republican advantage, not advantage exactly, but you've seen in a

1044
00:57:41.559 --> 00:57:44.519
<v Speaker 1>lot of state races over the years, especially Senate and governor,

1045
00:57:45.079 --> 00:57:47.679
<v Speaker 1>that the Democrat will be ahead well in the late

1046
00:57:47.719 --> 00:57:52.119
<v Speaker 1>September and Republicans hold their fire hold their money and

1047
00:57:52.159 --> 00:57:54.920
<v Speaker 1>then they do a big paid ad blitz because you know,

1048
00:57:55.119 --> 00:57:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it's Trump's been pretty good and throughout the last ten

1049
00:57:58.039 --> 00:58:01.559
<v Speaker 1>years getting free media because he's such as right, and

1050
00:58:01.599 --> 00:58:04.000
<v Speaker 1>hopefully he will return to being effective at that. But

1051
00:58:04.079 --> 00:58:08.239
<v Speaker 1>for other Republicans, it's always been paid media to overcome

1052
00:58:08.280 --> 00:58:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the bias of the free media, and that's when you

1053
00:58:12.400 --> 00:58:15.639
<v Speaker 1>often see the late charges by Republican candidates. It hasn't

1054
00:58:15.639 --> 00:58:18.400
<v Speaker 1>played on the presidential races that much, but this is

1055
00:58:18.440 --> 00:58:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the bigger, different thing, but it's certainly been a factor

1056
00:58:21.079 --> 00:58:23.559
<v Speaker 1>in state races over the years, and I think that

1057
00:58:23.639 --> 00:58:25.639
<v Speaker 1>may be the pattern we'll see here. I think it

1058
00:58:25.679 --> 00:58:27.639
<v Speaker 1>was the pattern in nineteen eighty eight with Bush and

1059
00:58:27.719 --> 00:58:30.440
<v Speaker 1>du Caucus when Bush was so far down until they

1060
00:58:30.480 --> 00:58:34.599
<v Speaker 1>opened up on Ducaccas's weaknesses and concealments. By the way,

1061
00:58:34.599 --> 00:58:38.079
<v Speaker 1>one last thing Henry Olsen has a good piece out

1062
00:58:38.119 --> 00:58:39.800
<v Speaker 1>here in the last day or two where he looks

1063
00:58:39.800 --> 00:58:43.880
<v Speaker 1>at that woman in New Zealand, at just Cinda our door,

1064
00:58:43.880 --> 00:58:45.719
<v Speaker 1>whatever her name was, though it was so terrible about

1065
00:58:45.719 --> 00:58:49.400
<v Speaker 1>coming Aaron right, well, the story about her. I didn't

1066
00:58:49.400 --> 00:58:51.239
<v Speaker 1>know this, but Henry of course knows these things because

1067
00:58:51.280 --> 00:58:54.440
<v Speaker 1>he's such a nerd about it. She originally was a

1068
00:58:54.440 --> 00:58:57.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit like Kamela. She was not the first choice

1069
00:58:57.320 --> 00:58:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Labor Party. But then she ousted or something happen,

1070
00:59:00.039 --> 00:59:02.519
<v Speaker 1>and then the leader Labor Party had a step down

1071
00:59:02.559 --> 00:59:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and she took his place, huge surge of popularity. She

1072
00:59:06.400 --> 00:59:10.719
<v Speaker 1>ended up losing the election by seven percent uh to

1073
00:59:10.760 --> 00:59:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the you know, behind the somebody who came in ahead

1074
00:59:12.960 --> 00:59:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of her. She formed a government with some minority parties

1075
00:59:15.400 --> 00:59:18.039
<v Speaker 1>because it's one of those parliamentary stupid systems they have.

1076
00:59:18.639 --> 00:59:20.360
<v Speaker 1>But there's a case of where, you know, at first,

1077
00:59:20.440 --> 00:59:23.079
<v Speaker 1>all was excitement for the woman. New Zealand never had

1078
00:59:23.079 --> 00:59:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a woman prime minister or whatever they all call them there,

1079
00:59:25.840 --> 00:59:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, by the time they actually got

1080
00:59:28.360 --> 00:59:30.719
<v Speaker 1>around to casting ballots and those short elections they have

1081
00:59:31.599 --> 00:59:34.800
<v Speaker 1>like England, people said no, actually, we don't like her

1082
00:59:34.880 --> 00:59:37.159
<v Speaker 1>very much, and they were right not to like her.

1083
00:59:39.440 --> 00:59:44.840
<v Speaker 4>John U Christia, I cannot remember what your original question was,

1084
00:59:44.920 --> 00:59:49.880
<v Speaker 4>whether or not I was thinking I was thinking so

1085
00:59:50.000 --> 00:59:56.920
<v Speaker 4>much about New Zealand. I met me down. Sorry, no, no, no,

1086
00:59:56.960 --> 01:00:00.599
<v Speaker 4>I'm just I'm just joking. I we'll agree to you.

1087
01:00:00.679 --> 01:00:05.159
<v Speaker 4>It's just whether that transition to where, uh, you know,

1088
01:00:05.239 --> 01:00:10.320
<v Speaker 4>new media just provides a complete right replacement for sort

1089
01:00:10.320 --> 01:00:14.039
<v Speaker 4>of the media being you know, our content being bottlenecked

1090
01:00:14.039 --> 01:00:17.400
<v Speaker 4>through you know, just a few major media companies. Obviously

1091
01:00:17.400 --> 01:00:18.880
<v Speaker 4>that's going to be the future. I just don't know

1092
01:00:18.920 --> 01:00:22.400
<v Speaker 4>whether it will be soon enough. Right like this, I

1093
01:00:22.400 --> 01:00:25.280
<v Speaker 4>mean we all seem to be acknowledging that the media's

1094
01:00:25.400 --> 01:00:28.239
<v Speaker 4>support for Kamala Harris like not, you know, just not

1095
01:00:28.360 --> 01:00:33.039
<v Speaker 4>criticizing her for not doing interviews, for having no policies, uh.

1096
01:00:33.639 --> 01:00:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Campaign choice policies.

1097
01:00:36.239 --> 01:00:39.559
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, this campaign of joy silliness. I don't want my

1098
01:00:39.639 --> 01:00:43.480
<v Speaker 4>politicians to be joyous actually or joyful frankly.

1099
01:00:43.119 --> 01:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I know.

1100
01:00:43.440 --> 01:00:48.599
<v Speaker 4>I mean, yeah they go go run for cheerleader cheerleader

1101
01:00:48.639 --> 01:00:51.960
<v Speaker 4>in chief then but you know, I but we're all

1102
01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:54.280
<v Speaker 4>acknowledging it seems to still make a big difference. I mean,

1103
01:00:54.440 --> 01:00:57.280
<v Speaker 4>it can produce a five point difference. That's huge.

1104
01:00:57.199 --> 01:00:59.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it does make a big difference. There's no doubt

1105
01:00:59.559 --> 01:01:03.480
<v Speaker 3>about it. Is there's still many many people for whom

1106
01:01:04.159 --> 01:01:07.920
<v Speaker 3>the view or the you know, the watch the CBS

1107
01:01:08.079 --> 01:01:11.199
<v Speaker 3>nightly News and they consider it gospel. There are a

1108
01:01:11.239 --> 01:01:14.360
<v Speaker 3>lot of people out there. And then of course the

1109
01:01:14.920 --> 01:01:19.400
<v Speaker 3>rest of the expanded media landscape still takes many of

1110
01:01:19.440 --> 01:01:23.000
<v Speaker 3>its cues from that legacy media. There's no doubt about it.

1111
01:01:23.039 --> 01:01:26.159
<v Speaker 3>But what I would say is things like Waltz's We

1112
01:01:26.199 --> 01:01:29.320
<v Speaker 3>talked about this briefly last week, maybe on the Ricochet podcast,

1113
01:01:29.360 --> 01:01:36.039
<v Speaker 3>but Waltz's despicable abandoning of his troops, his lying about

1114
01:01:36.079 --> 01:01:38.840
<v Speaker 3>the fact that he served in combat, his lying about

1115
01:01:38.840 --> 01:01:41.199
<v Speaker 3>the fact that he retired as a command sergeant major,

1116
01:01:41.280 --> 01:01:46.519
<v Speaker 3>all of that which was known when he ran for governor,

1117
01:01:46.760 --> 01:01:50.920
<v Speaker 3>and the local media would not cover it. If not

1118
01:01:51.159 --> 01:01:55.440
<v Speaker 3>for Twitter. I believe this sincerely, it never would have

1119
01:01:55.519 --> 01:01:57.679
<v Speaker 3>become an issue at all, and it is. It is

1120
01:01:57.679 --> 01:01:59.880
<v Speaker 3>one of the biggest issues on Twitter, of course, but

1121
01:02:00.559 --> 01:02:03.960
<v Speaker 3>because it's the right kind of form for that, there's

1122
01:02:04.000 --> 01:02:07.639
<v Speaker 3>a lot of different things that never would have seen

1123
01:02:07.679 --> 01:02:09.800
<v Speaker 3>the light of day if it had been left up

1124
01:02:09.840 --> 01:02:14.079
<v Speaker 3>to legacy media, and that I think just this whole

1125
01:02:14.119 --> 01:02:16.519
<v Speaker 3>business I wanted to almost forgot to bring it up

1126
01:02:16.880 --> 01:02:20.960
<v Speaker 3>in this context, the whole business about Hunter Biden going

1127
01:02:21.039 --> 01:02:26.360
<v Speaker 3>to the State Department. Oh, and you explain it, because

1128
01:02:26.360 --> 01:02:29.199
<v Speaker 3>I'll get it wrong. It's a little on the complicated.

1129
01:02:29.599 --> 01:02:32.199
<v Speaker 4>This is actually a good example of things in media.

1130
01:02:32.960 --> 01:02:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Is not asking Harris and she doesn't feel like she

1131
01:02:35.039 --> 01:02:39.360
<v Speaker 4>has to answer, which is whether she would continue the

1132
01:02:39.400 --> 01:02:43.199
<v Speaker 4>way that Justice Department has treated Hunter Biden with kid

1133
01:02:43.239 --> 01:02:47.199
<v Speaker 4>gloves and allowed the fact that he's President Biden's son

1134
01:02:47.400 --> 01:02:49.719
<v Speaker 4>to be a get out of jail free card. And

1135
01:02:49.840 --> 01:02:52.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, although I have the greatest respect for the

1136
01:02:52.039 --> 01:02:56.480
<v Speaker 4>Department of Justice, I have been persuaded that they have

1137
01:02:57.199 --> 01:03:00.519
<v Speaker 4>been playing political games with the choice of prosecutution. So

1138
01:03:00.559 --> 01:03:04.360
<v Speaker 4>the way they went after Trump, I think mistakenly so,

1139
01:03:04.559 --> 01:03:06.960
<v Speaker 4>and then the way they haven't gone after Hunter Biden.

1140
01:03:07.320 --> 01:03:10.280
<v Speaker 4>So in this case, the news this week was that

1141
01:03:10.920 --> 01:03:16.320
<v Speaker 4>Hunter Biden, while Joe Biden was Vice president, was writing

1142
01:03:16.400 --> 01:03:18.719
<v Speaker 4>letters and we don't know what else phone calls or

1143
01:03:18.760 --> 01:03:22.519
<v Speaker 4>emails he was sending as well to officials in the

1144
01:03:22.559 --> 01:03:27.639
<v Speaker 4>American embassy in Italy. Because the Ukrainian company Barisma, which

1145
01:03:27.719 --> 01:03:31.440
<v Speaker 4>put Hunter Biden on its Board wanted to open some

1146
01:03:31.559 --> 01:03:35.639
<v Speaker 4>kind of plant in Italy and wanted so Hunter was

1147
01:03:35.639 --> 01:03:38.360
<v Speaker 4>trying to use his contacts at the State Department to

1148
01:03:38.440 --> 01:03:41.679
<v Speaker 4>get the US government to weigh in with the Italian

1149
01:03:41.719 --> 01:03:45.960
<v Speaker 4>government to let his buddy is Ukrainian buddies get some

1150
01:03:46.079 --> 01:03:50.159
<v Speaker 4>kind of business advantage. Gosh, that seemed like it was

1151
01:03:50.239 --> 01:03:53.159
<v Speaker 4>peddling and bribery to me. But you know, he may

1152
01:03:53.199 --> 01:03:56.480
<v Speaker 4>never be called to account for it because the Justice

1153
01:03:56.519 --> 01:03:59.440
<v Speaker 4>Department seems so sad on this for so long that

1154
01:03:59.440 --> 01:04:01.639
<v Speaker 4>they won't be able to prosecute him. It happened too

1155
01:04:01.639 --> 01:04:05.360
<v Speaker 4>long ago, which is outrageous, actually, I mean, that is

1156
01:04:05.400 --> 01:04:08.239
<v Speaker 4>the kind of mistake lawyer should get get fired for.

1157
01:04:08.320 --> 01:04:11.519
<v Speaker 4>It's like you let something, you just sit on something

1158
01:04:11.639 --> 01:04:14.920
<v Speaker 4>so long that the case becomes too old and you're

1159
01:04:14.960 --> 01:04:18.119
<v Speaker 4>forbidden by law from prosecuting somebody for it. That's a

1160
01:04:18.199 --> 01:04:19.400
<v Speaker 4>fundamental mistake.

1161
01:04:20.079 --> 01:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even if there's not a statute of limitations problem,

1162
01:04:22.920 --> 01:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>which I'll bet there is, after this much time they're

1163
01:04:25.000 --> 01:04:27.639
<v Speaker 1>going by, there is yeah, well, okay, well there certainly

1164
01:04:27.679 --> 01:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>ought to be. And again, you know, I say this,

1165
01:04:29.559 --> 01:04:32.079
<v Speaker 1>and Lucretia is quite right to say, when do these

1166
01:04:32.119 --> 01:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>guys actually get it right, there ought to be some

1167
01:04:34.119 --> 01:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>serious oversight hearings and drag the State Department people through

1168
01:04:38.320 --> 01:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the across the hot coals about this, because this is

1169
01:04:42.000 --> 01:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable corruption. Uh, and we're just na to mention.

1170
01:04:46.039 --> 01:04:49.760
<v Speaker 3>The impeachment the congressman involved in the impeachment.

1171
01:04:49.800 --> 01:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>But we go, right, yeah, that's right, Yeah, yeah, we

1172
01:04:52.400 --> 01:04:58.239
<v Speaker 1>impeach Trump because of a phone call and unbelievable And

1173
01:04:58.519 --> 01:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we know the State Department's rotten as a

1174
01:05:00.280 --> 01:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>general matter anyway, but so this would be a good

1175
01:05:02.199 --> 01:05:06.519
<v Speaker 1>way to keep them busy while sensible foreign policy things happen.

1176
01:05:07.239 --> 01:05:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm a little worried about that, but we've almost

1177
01:05:09.599 --> 01:05:12.880
<v Speaker 3>run out of time to discuss what's happening in Ukraine,

1178
01:05:12.920 --> 01:05:15.360
<v Speaker 3>so we'll have to save that for next time. I

1179
01:05:15.480 --> 01:05:20.599
<v Speaker 3>do want to mention or give John the opportunity to

1180
01:05:21.239 --> 01:05:24.639
<v Speaker 3>bring up his question to us from the point of

1181
01:05:24.679 --> 01:05:28.519
<v Speaker 3>view of the Marshall program, where he's being told that

1182
01:05:29.599 --> 01:05:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Marshall scholars that are interested perhaps they're going to be

1183
01:05:34.000 --> 01:05:37.559
<v Speaker 3>judges someday, or their clerks and so on. They're lawyers. Now,

1184
01:05:37.639 --> 01:05:40.519
<v Speaker 3>young lawyers are in law school. I don't remember that

1185
01:05:40.679 --> 01:05:46.880
<v Speaker 3>they should be applying natural law to legal decisions. I

1186
01:05:47.039 --> 01:05:51.639
<v Speaker 3>promise you if anybody at Claremont said that they're dumb,

1187
01:05:52.320 --> 01:05:56.880
<v Speaker 3>that's never what Jaffa said. Okay, go ahead, Sorry, No, that's.

1188
01:05:56.760 --> 01:06:00.280
<v Speaker 4>Exactly what I What was hoping we talked about is

1189
01:06:01.280 --> 01:06:06.840
<v Speaker 4>to what extent should judges and courts use unwritten natural

1190
01:06:06.920 --> 01:06:10.800
<v Speaker 4>law or natural rights when they interpret the Constitution.

1191
01:06:11.440 --> 01:06:15.920
<v Speaker 3>First of all, where do you get the unwritten from unwritten.

1192
01:06:15.599 --> 01:06:17.719
<v Speaker 4>In the sense it's not in the constitutional text.

1193
01:06:18.159 --> 01:06:22.840
<v Speaker 3>It's in the Declaration of Independence, which both Jefferson Madison

1194
01:06:23.599 --> 01:06:26.679
<v Speaker 3>Washington all said is our foundational document.

1195
01:06:27.280 --> 01:06:30.920
<v Speaker 4>Okay, okay, So whether you should apply the Declaration of

1196
01:06:30.960 --> 01:06:36.159
<v Speaker 4>Independence in constitutional cases? So here will be an example,

1197
01:06:36.320 --> 01:06:39.199
<v Speaker 4>would be an example. So we haven't talked about this.

1198
01:06:39.239 --> 01:06:41.519
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure we're going to talk about it tomorrow. So

1199
01:06:43.360 --> 01:06:47.599
<v Speaker 4>could you say that the Supreme Court could interpret the

1200
01:06:47.639 --> 01:06:51.559
<v Speaker 4>word life in the fourteenth Amendment right says and in

1201
01:06:51.599 --> 01:06:54.719
<v Speaker 4>the Fifth Amendment right the government's not allowed to take

1202
01:06:54.760 --> 01:06:59.000
<v Speaker 4>away life, liberty, or property to process. Could the Supreme

1203
01:06:59.079 --> 01:07:05.559
<v Speaker 4>Court say the natural law understanding of life includes fetal

1204
01:07:05.599 --> 01:07:08.280
<v Speaker 4>life from the moment of conception, because we think that's

1205
01:07:08.320 --> 01:07:13.519
<v Speaker 4>what natural rights mean now and actually pro strike down

1206
01:07:14.320 --> 01:07:18.679
<v Speaker 4>state laws that allow for generous abortion rights. So that

1207
01:07:18.719 --> 01:07:21.400
<v Speaker 4>would be the kind of that's the kind of question

1208
01:07:21.480 --> 01:07:24.079
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about where I would say, you know, the

1209
01:07:24.440 --> 01:07:25.320
<v Speaker 4>go ahead, you guys.

1210
01:07:25.360 --> 01:07:27.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm just going to say, this would be my simplest

1211
01:07:27.760 --> 01:07:30.360
<v Speaker 3>way of answering that maybe it's not the best way.

1212
01:07:31.239 --> 01:07:37.320
<v Speaker 3>But when Lincoln, for instance, was debating the question about slavery,

1213
01:07:38.400 --> 01:07:44.519
<v Speaker 3>his reference to slavery was not what happened when the

1214
01:07:44.559 --> 01:07:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Constitution was put together. It was the principles of the

1215
01:07:47.360 --> 01:07:52.079
<v Speaker 3>Declaration of Independence. Okay. The fact that slavery was included

1216
01:07:52.079 --> 01:07:56.480
<v Speaker 3>in the Constitution did not mean that somehow it was

1217
01:07:56.679 --> 01:08:00.119
<v Speaker 3>a part of the original understanding of the Constitution. And

1218
01:08:02.400 --> 01:08:07.719
<v Speaker 3>his reference point to the question of slavery was was

1219
01:08:07.719 --> 01:08:10.280
<v Speaker 3>a slave a human being? And if a human being,

1220
01:08:10.559 --> 01:08:15.400
<v Speaker 3>were they entitled to the protection of life guaranteed in

1221
01:08:15.440 --> 01:08:19.039
<v Speaker 3>the Constitution as a natural right? Okay? And he talked

1222
01:08:19.079 --> 01:08:22.039
<v Speaker 3>about what kinds of things do you consider if a

1223
01:08:22.079 --> 01:08:24.600
<v Speaker 3>black as a human being? And he made some great

1224
01:08:24.680 --> 01:08:28.119
<v Speaker 3>arguments about that. But at the same time, you will

1225
01:08:28.159 --> 01:08:32.359
<v Speaker 3>recall that he was never the person who claimed that

1226
01:08:32.439 --> 01:08:36.560
<v Speaker 3>we should immediately abolish slavery because it violated natural law,

1227
01:08:36.760 --> 01:08:39.800
<v Speaker 3>even though he claimed it over and over and over again.

1228
01:08:39.920 --> 01:08:43.640
<v Speaker 3>He said, we will follow the Constitution fully. We're not

1229
01:08:43.800 --> 01:08:49.039
<v Speaker 3>about going out to the states and abolishing slavery all

1230
01:08:49.079 --> 01:08:55.600
<v Speaker 3>of that. He also believed that understanding what it meant

1231
01:08:55.640 --> 01:08:58.640
<v Speaker 3>to be a human being, and that we should be

1232
01:08:58.720 --> 01:09:04.199
<v Speaker 3>moving more and more more towards the perfection of a regime,

1233
01:09:04.359 --> 01:09:07.920
<v Speaker 3>a constitution, a society, a government that would protect that

1234
01:09:08.079 --> 01:09:10.439
<v Speaker 3>life in the same way they protected every other life.

1235
01:09:10.880 --> 01:09:13.239
<v Speaker 3>That's what natural law tells us we have to do.

1236
01:09:14.159 --> 01:09:17.399
<v Speaker 3>It's not I'm going to plug this in and it's

1237
01:09:17.439 --> 01:09:18.960
<v Speaker 3>going to give me a magic answer.

1238
01:09:20.920 --> 01:09:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you.

1239
01:09:23.199 --> 01:09:26.119
<v Speaker 4>Can make a distinction there. There's to be what you're

1240
01:09:26.159 --> 01:09:29.920
<v Speaker 4>saying is there's a distinction between saying, Okay, we have

1241
01:09:30.039 --> 01:09:35.199
<v Speaker 4>this moral goal ending slavery that is given to us

1242
01:09:35.199 --> 01:09:40.560
<v Speaker 4>by your natural philosophy, and you're trying you want to

1243
01:09:40.640 --> 01:09:44.359
<v Speaker 4>move the positive law towards that direction, but you can't

1244
01:09:44.399 --> 01:09:48.960
<v Speaker 4>say that the Constitution prohibits slavery until the thirteenth Amendment.

1245
01:09:49.960 --> 01:09:51.920
<v Speaker 3>But why would you change the constitution?

1246
01:09:54.560 --> 01:09:57.399
<v Speaker 4>Oh, good question, because so this isn't the suppose this

1247
01:09:57.479 --> 01:10:00.840
<v Speaker 4>is my point, so to me, because slave is legal

1248
01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:05.399
<v Speaker 4>in the United States until the thirteenth Amendment, the Constitution well,

1249
01:10:06.239 --> 01:10:08.239
<v Speaker 4>but but this is my point. This is why I'm

1250
01:10:08.279 --> 01:10:12.159
<v Speaker 4>raising this question because your friends here at the Claremonts

1251
01:10:12.199 --> 01:10:16.920
<v Speaker 4>you're telling me no, that that actually slavery is moral

1252
01:10:17.000 --> 01:10:20.079
<v Speaker 4>and illegal. Even before the thirteenth Amendment, I was like,

1253
01:10:20.439 --> 01:10:21.880
<v Speaker 4>that's not I can't.

1254
01:10:21.680 --> 01:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Be right state strictly speaking, John, By the way, I

1255
01:10:25.800 --> 01:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>think you're punking as John, And I'll tell you why.

1256
01:10:28.000 --> 01:10:30.760
<v Speaker 4>I think that I'm what I'm doing what you.

1257
01:10:32.359 --> 01:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Know better, but you don't want to minute. Yeah, so look,

1258
01:10:36.760 --> 01:10:37.359
<v Speaker 1>I could.

1259
01:10:37.159 --> 01:10:38.760
<v Speaker 4>Be doing that. Yes, that's true.

1260
01:10:39.039 --> 01:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Strictly speaking, it's not really true to say that slavery

1261
01:10:42.760 --> 01:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>was legal in the United States. It was legal and

1262
01:10:45.760 --> 01:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>individual states that were part of the Union. I mean

1263
01:10:48.960 --> 01:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that was part of the dissent andred Scott from us

1264
01:10:52.840 --> 01:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>was the Constitution permitted slavery to exist? Okay, Well, Jaffa

1265
01:10:57.079 --> 01:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>used to say, I'll paraprase them slightly. I think you'll

1266
01:10:59.800 --> 01:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>set this lucretia. Jeff used to say, the beginning of

1267
01:11:01.960 --> 01:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>wisdom on these matters is to be able to make

1268
01:11:04.600 --> 01:11:08.279
<v Speaker 1>a distinction between the principles of the Constitution and the

1269
01:11:08.359 --> 01:11:11.319
<v Speaker 1>compromises of the constitution that you needed to get a

1270
01:11:11.359 --> 01:11:14.279
<v Speaker 1>constitution at all, Right, that's the whole story of the convention,

1271
01:11:14.439 --> 01:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>or the central story of the convention, right.

1272
01:11:16.920 --> 01:11:20.720
<v Speaker 3>And the overarching concept that defines that, Steve, by the way,

1273
01:11:20.840 --> 01:11:23.439
<v Speaker 3>is something called students.

1274
01:11:23.119 --> 01:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Correct, of course, but you know, I mean, look, John's

1275
01:11:25.720 --> 01:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>never going to get a C from our class on

1276
01:11:27.640 --> 01:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>prudence is just see, we're gonna flunck him every time.

1277
01:11:29.680 --> 01:11:31.279
<v Speaker 1>But what do you mean?

1278
01:11:31.319 --> 01:11:35.720
<v Speaker 4>This is the difference between constitutional principle and then constitutional compromise.

1279
01:11:35.920 --> 01:11:38.560
<v Speaker 4>What's important is what does the text of the Constitution

1280
01:11:38.680 --> 01:11:41.680
<v Speaker 4>say to me. You could say, oh, the text of

1281
01:11:41.680 --> 01:11:45.920
<v Speaker 4>the Constitution will let me contradicted or superseded by the

1282
01:11:45.960 --> 01:11:49.079
<v Speaker 4>principles of it that are well there, let me go

1283
01:11:49.159 --> 01:11:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Back's just you're inferring. So this is actually I mean,

1284
01:11:51.800 --> 01:11:53.279
<v Speaker 4>I'm not punking it out at this point. You're just

1285
01:11:53.720 --> 01:11:57.600
<v Speaker 4>inferring some principle of the Constitution. If it's not expressed

1286
01:11:57.600 --> 01:12:00.560
<v Speaker 4>in a written text, then it's not in there.

1287
01:12:00.720 --> 01:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Well no, wait a minute, John, let me go back

1288
01:12:02.560 --> 01:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to your original question and started this challenge, which was,

1289
01:12:05.520 --> 01:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>could a judge use the word life in the fourteenth

1290
01:12:08.840 --> 01:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>and Fifth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment and fifth Amendment to strike

1291
01:12:12.520 --> 01:12:18.439
<v Speaker 1>down a statute that had very expansive abortion rights.

1292
01:12:18.680 --> 01:12:20.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, like in California.

1293
01:12:20.279 --> 01:12:25.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, Well all right, John, What if if you're

1294
01:12:25.159 --> 01:12:29.239
<v Speaker 1>pure positivists, which you sometimes say you are, what do

1295
01:12:29.319 --> 01:12:32.039
<v Speaker 1>you do about a state that past the statute has said, actually,

1296
01:12:32.399 --> 01:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>we define life as beginning at age ten, that no

1297
01:12:36.560 --> 01:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>being is a title to the protections of the law

1298
01:12:38.920 --> 01:12:41.119
<v Speaker 1>until they're ten years old. By the way, that's only

1299
01:12:41.119 --> 01:12:44.039
<v Speaker 1>a slight exaggeration of that Peter Singer guy at Princeton,

1300
01:12:45.279 --> 01:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>which is a really can't really be the John You

1301
01:12:48.119 --> 01:12:52.359
<v Speaker 1>position that a judge says, well, that's what the legislature decided.

1302
01:12:52.399 --> 01:12:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess I have to defer to that. I think

1303
01:12:54.720 --> 01:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a person would be on very solid ground and saying, hey,

1304
01:12:56.600 --> 01:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute. There may be serious scientific arguments about

1305
01:13:00.039 --> 01:13:03.319
<v Speaker 1>when human life can be said to begin viability outside

1306
01:13:03.319 --> 01:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the woman and all the rest of that, but we're

1307
01:13:05.840 --> 01:13:08.159
<v Speaker 1>we're confident enough that we know that life doesn't mean

1308
01:13:08.199 --> 01:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>ten years old for the purposes of that.

1309
01:13:09.760 --> 01:13:13.159
<v Speaker 4>I mean, unfortunately, I would say we do allow states

1310
01:13:13.159 --> 01:13:15.000
<v Speaker 4>to make decisions like that, in the sense that we

1311
01:13:15.079 --> 01:13:19.520
<v Speaker 4>allow life to end based on people right, some states

1312
01:13:19.800 --> 01:13:23.359
<v Speaker 4>saying oh, this life is no longer a human life

1313
01:13:23.399 --> 01:13:27.760
<v Speaker 4>because we think they're well, you know, we think they're terminal,

1314
01:13:28.039 --> 01:13:32.640
<v Speaker 4>and so will allow euthanasia not consider it murder. Well, morally,

1315
01:13:32.640 --> 01:13:35.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't like these laws, but organs allowed to do

1316
01:13:35.920 --> 01:13:38.800
<v Speaker 4>this under the Constitution now, and there aren't they effectively

1317
01:13:38.840 --> 01:13:39.600
<v Speaker 4>saying human life.

1318
01:13:39.640 --> 01:13:41.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm not convinced that they should be.

1319
01:13:41.319 --> 01:13:43.680
<v Speaker 4>Valuable if you're eighty and you have cancer.

1320
01:13:43.920 --> 01:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let me go on a little bit more on this.

1321
01:13:47.239 --> 01:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Let me just.

1322
01:13:47.600 --> 01:13:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Answer that really quick point. Steven. I'll let you go

1323
01:13:49.560 --> 01:13:51.399
<v Speaker 3>on because I do want you to finish. But when

1324
01:13:51.399 --> 01:13:54.399
<v Speaker 3>you say allowed under the Constitution, the fact that we've

1325
01:13:54.399 --> 01:13:58.319
<v Speaker 3>had idiot judges who have issued idiotic decisions that have

1326
01:13:58.359 --> 01:14:02.560
<v Speaker 3>said that's okay doesn't mean it's allowed under the Constitution.

1327
01:14:02.880 --> 01:14:06.560
<v Speaker 3>That's not Those two things are not the same thing.

1328
01:14:07.159 --> 01:14:10.479
<v Speaker 3>The fact that the Supreme Court has said something stupid,

1329
01:14:11.079 --> 01:14:14.840
<v Speaker 3>the fact that the Ninth Circuit Court has said something stupid,

1330
01:14:15.319 --> 01:14:17.840
<v Speaker 3>doesn't give you the right to say, well, the Constitution

1331
01:14:18.039 --> 01:14:20.920
<v Speaker 3>allows it. No, a judge allowed it, and the Constitution

1332
01:14:21.000 --> 01:14:24.640
<v Speaker 3>and a judge's decision about it are not the same thing. Sorry,

1333
01:14:24.680 --> 01:14:25.239
<v Speaker 3>go ahead, Steve.

1334
01:14:25.640 --> 01:14:27.760
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Well, then I would be willing to say that

1335
01:14:27.880 --> 01:14:32.399
<v Speaker 4>I don't think the Constitution and it's phrase life. Putting

1336
01:14:32.399 --> 01:14:38.760
<v Speaker 4>aside what judges think would authorize courts to invalidate euthanasia

1337
01:14:38.880 --> 01:14:41.760
<v Speaker 4>laws of the kind that Oregon has. Well, all right,

1338
01:14:41.880 --> 01:14:43.760
<v Speaker 4>that's left up to the states.

1339
01:14:44.079 --> 01:14:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave that issue aside, because I think we're just

1340
01:14:47.359 --> 01:14:50.399
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of some legal tangles about that. I think

1341
01:14:50.439 --> 01:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>we haven't really confronted as directly as we have abortion.

1342
01:14:53.880 --> 01:14:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Look that you know, I sent you that draft article

1343
01:14:56.279 --> 01:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I've written. It's too short, but I got reflecting on

1344
01:14:58.960 --> 01:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that judg we always say Justice Thomas is

1345
01:15:01.720 --> 01:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the natural law person on the court. But then I

1346
01:15:04.680 --> 01:15:09.319
<v Speaker 1>look at Justice Alito's opinion in Dobbs, and what did

1347
01:15:09.319 --> 01:15:15.079
<v Speaker 1>he do in order to overcome story decisis of Roe.

1348
01:15:15.760 --> 01:15:20.119
<v Speaker 1>He decided to invoke the classic common law works going

1349
01:15:20.199 --> 01:15:23.079
<v Speaker 1>all the way back to Bracton in the thirteenth century,

1350
01:15:23.520 --> 01:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>but also Matthew Hale Blackstone, right, some of the classic

1351
01:15:27.039 --> 01:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>common law treatise writers of the thirteenth century to the

1352
01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth century, and what all of them said was, for

1353
01:15:35.640 --> 01:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the purposes of protection of the law, life begins at quickening,

1354
01:15:38.640 --> 01:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>which is really derived from Aquitas and so forth. Now

1355
01:15:42.880 --> 01:15:46.039
<v Speaker 1>where I think here's the axis of the argument is

1356
01:15:46.199 --> 01:15:48.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm one of those persons who think that the common

1357
01:15:48.199 --> 01:15:52.239
<v Speaker 1>law is applied natural law. And remember that one of

1358
01:15:52.319 --> 01:15:55.479
<v Speaker 1>the reasons Justice Scalia did not like the common law

1359
01:15:55.560 --> 01:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>or common law mode of judging, as he said, it's

1360
01:15:58.119 --> 01:16:01.479
<v Speaker 1>too much power to judges. It's anti democrats. And that's

1361
01:16:01.520 --> 01:16:06.119
<v Speaker 1>because he bought in fully to judge made law, whereas

1362
01:16:06.279 --> 01:16:09.159
<v Speaker 1>I think rightly understood the old common law tradition was

1363
01:16:09.359 --> 01:16:14.239
<v Speaker 1>judge discovered law. How do they discover the law? Well,

1364
01:16:14.239 --> 01:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>they have to use a chain of reasoning, and yeah,

1365
01:16:16.720 --> 01:16:19.199
<v Speaker 1>it gets very tangled. And you know, somewhere here I've

1366
01:16:19.199 --> 01:16:22.039
<v Speaker 1>got a copy of Pluck and it's concise History of

1367
01:16:22.079 --> 01:16:25.399
<v Speaker 1>the common Law. That's twelve hundred pages long. I'd love

1368
01:16:25.439 --> 01:16:27.439
<v Speaker 1>to see what the complete history is that that's the

1369
01:16:27.520 --> 01:16:28.319
<v Speaker 1>concise history.

1370
01:16:28.399 --> 01:16:29.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I've never seen.

1371
01:16:31.520 --> 01:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>That's an amazing thing. That's very small print. Right, But look,

1372
01:16:34.800 --> 01:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>there's the point is that, uh, you know, the old

1373
01:16:38.000 --> 01:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>common law reasoning that rests upon natural law is not

1374
01:16:40.880 --> 01:16:44.159
<v Speaker 1>obsolete and ought not to be that difficult for us

1375
01:16:44.199 --> 01:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to reapply at modern times. And then my point of

1376
01:16:46.800 --> 01:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the article I'm trying to develop is we're starting to

1377
01:16:49.000 --> 01:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>see that coming back a little bit in ways that

1378
01:16:51.960 --> 01:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I wish Scalia were still around to reflect upon because

1379
01:16:54.720 --> 01:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>he was unconc.

1380
01:16:56.000 --> 01:17:00.159
<v Speaker 4>Here's the other thing Scalia would say would be, uh, know,

1381
01:17:00.399 --> 01:17:04.920
<v Speaker 4>you're saying that it's a natural law that is the

1382
01:17:04.960 --> 01:17:10.920
<v Speaker 4>governing moral system that the Constitution helps express the great

1383
01:17:10.960 --> 01:17:15.000
<v Speaker 4>majority of people today, at least philosophers, are not natural

1384
01:17:15.039 --> 01:17:18.239
<v Speaker 4>law people. So he would say, like the philosophy you

1385
01:17:18.359 --> 01:17:24.439
<v Speaker 4>choose to adopt and express, the Constitution is not fixed

1386
01:17:24.560 --> 01:17:26.760
<v Speaker 4>unless you how can. In other words, he would say,

1387
01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:29.359
<v Speaker 4>you would only win if you could show natural law

1388
01:17:29.399 --> 01:17:32.319
<v Speaker 4>and natural rights has to be the actually true and

1389
01:17:32.359 --> 01:17:36.439
<v Speaker 4>correct system of morality. And Sklee would say, I'm not

1390
01:17:36.560 --> 01:17:38.760
<v Speaker 4>sure about that. But if you want to ask all

1391
01:17:38.760 --> 01:17:42.800
<v Speaker 4>these philosophers, they would say, no, right, the take the

1392
01:17:42.880 --> 01:17:44.720
<v Speaker 4>call of the But if you were to say there,

1393
01:17:44.800 --> 01:17:47.720
<v Speaker 4>you know the philosophers in the world say they're whatever

1394
01:17:47.720 --> 01:17:50.680
<v Speaker 4>one hundred percent, what percentage of them actually would say, oh,

1395
01:17:50.720 --> 01:17:54.680
<v Speaker 4>I believe natural law natural rights is actually the governing

1396
01:17:54.920 --> 01:17:57.600
<v Speaker 4>law system. It would be like less than five percent.

1397
01:17:57.680 --> 01:18:03.119
<v Speaker 3>When non sequitor John it doesn't matter if you understand

1398
01:18:03.680 --> 01:18:07.279
<v Speaker 3>what it is, the what the natural law principles embedded

1399
01:18:07.279 --> 01:18:11.079
<v Speaker 3>in the declaration. They are not complicated, they are simple

1400
01:18:11.159 --> 01:18:17.920
<v Speaker 3>and straightforward and un unassailable to basic human reason as

1401
01:18:18.000 --> 01:18:23.600
<v Speaker 3>anything has ever been. Steve's already looking for another glass

1402
01:18:23.600 --> 01:18:25.960
<v Speaker 3>of whiskey, and he's telling me, you've got to end

1403
01:18:25.960 --> 01:18:29.800
<v Speaker 3>this for this time. But you've got to stop somehow

1404
01:18:29.840 --> 01:18:34.840
<v Speaker 3>this depends upon someone's opinion about it. It doesn't okay,

1405
01:18:34.920 --> 01:18:37.319
<v Speaker 3>all right, I gotta go to I gotta go quickly

1406
01:18:37.399 --> 01:18:40.600
<v Speaker 3>to Babylon b before Steve just cuts me off and

1407
01:18:40.640 --> 01:18:42.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't get to do it. We will take this up,

1408
01:18:43.319 --> 01:18:49.039
<v Speaker 3>so lovely picture of David French in a dress and pearls,

1409
01:18:49.760 --> 01:18:53.119
<v Speaker 3>and it says David French says, to save masculinity, he

1410
01:18:53.199 --> 01:18:59.520
<v Speaker 3>will now transition to female. Yeah, enough of our people

1411
01:18:59.560 --> 01:19:02.239
<v Speaker 3>know who did Frenches and stupid stuff, he says. So

1412
01:19:02.640 --> 01:19:06.720
<v Speaker 3>meet Brinley, pretty blonde woman, the White House intern running

1413
01:19:06.760 --> 01:19:10.199
<v Speaker 3>the country today. Meet Brinley. It's this plucky White House

1414
01:19:10.239 --> 01:19:13.359
<v Speaker 3>interns to run the country. Her turn. Join us as

1415
01:19:13.399 --> 01:19:17.399
<v Speaker 3>we take a look at her busy, exciting day. After

1416
01:19:17.439 --> 01:19:21.439
<v Speaker 3>two weeks with Kamala, Tim Walt's announces he's signed back

1417
01:19:21.520 --> 01:19:24.680
<v Speaker 3>up with the National Guard and requested it to be deployed

1418
01:19:24.720 --> 01:19:28.560
<v Speaker 3>to a rat Actually think that's pretty funny.

1419
01:19:28.520 --> 01:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Or the other one. Did they have one that said

1420
01:19:30.920 --> 01:19:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Waltz drops off a ticket when he learns yes to

1421
01:19:32.960 --> 01:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>visit battleground states Yes, that.

1422
01:19:35.800 --> 01:19:38.880
<v Speaker 3>One was good too. He clarifies that he's not stealing

1423
01:19:38.960 --> 01:19:46.600
<v Speaker 3>valor just redistributing it. The I will fix things if

1424
01:19:46.640 --> 01:19:50.039
<v Speaker 3>you vote me into office, says woman currently in office.

1425
01:19:50.079 --> 01:19:53.760
<v Speaker 3>That was not even funny. I'm sorry, just is uh

1426
01:19:54.039 --> 01:19:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Kamala to announce policy positions just as soon as Poles

1427
01:19:58.079 --> 01:20:04.520
<v Speaker 3>tells her, tell her what they are? Oh sorry, there's

1428
01:20:04.680 --> 01:20:07.399
<v Speaker 3>there's just too many, and all of mine are from

1429
01:20:07.479 --> 01:20:09.600
<v Speaker 3>like the last three days. This doesn't even take me

1430
01:20:09.680 --> 01:20:14.279
<v Speaker 3>back for a week, which it should. Uh Pamala Kamalama.

1431
01:20:14.319 --> 01:20:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Ding Dong's team releases new campaign slogan we decline your

1432
01:20:19.319 --> 01:20:24.880
<v Speaker 3>request for an interview. I like that one. And uh finally,

1433
01:20:25.119 --> 01:20:29.760
<v Speaker 3>my personal favorite tam Lama. Ding Dong takes commanding lead

1434
01:20:29.880 --> 01:20:33.199
<v Speaker 3>in poll of people who've recently been hit and head

1435
01:20:33.600 --> 01:20:39.920
<v Speaker 3>with a giant rubber mallet. Like, that's not exactly how

1436
01:20:39.960 --> 01:20:42.800
<v Speaker 3>I feel about things. They're just talking about my opinion

1437
01:20:42.840 --> 01:20:45.600
<v Speaker 3>that they're okay, sorry, you turn.

1438
01:20:45.560 --> 01:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, mercifully for you. John. We've come to an end

1439
01:20:48.279 --> 01:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>because we went much longer.

1440
01:20:49.520 --> 01:20:52.000
<v Speaker 4>We'd be getting I want to Okay, let's do let's

1441
01:20:52.039 --> 01:20:55.199
<v Speaker 4>pick walking up more next time. All right, we're not done,

1442
01:20:55.319 --> 01:20:59.119
<v Speaker 4>but hey, did did you pick a sign off?

1443
01:20:59.439 --> 01:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm still order.

1444
01:21:03.399 --> 01:21:05.199
<v Speaker 4>I'm shocked.

1445
01:21:06.520 --> 01:21:09.119
<v Speaker 3>The old one. It's time to drink the whiskey that

1446
01:21:09.279 --> 01:21:14.800
<v Speaker 3>have been drinking. That's times every day. Cackle, pack gackle,

1447
01:21:15.840 --> 01:21:16.119
<v Speaker 3>come a.

1448
01:21:16.119 --> 01:21:16.680
<v Speaker 4>Lot of rama.

1449
01:21:16.840 --> 01:21:17.600
<v Speaker 2>That's what I call.

1450
01:21:20.640 --> 01:22:44.760
<v Speaker 5>Bye Ricochet.

1451
01:22:46.439 --> 01:22:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Join the conversation.
