Speaker 1: Forty five for the h I enjoy it twenty six
Speaker 1: overnight with clear sky. We got clouds building up throughout
Speaker 1: the day Tomorrow with rain showing up sometime after four
Speaker 1: pm and high forty eight. Heavy rain at times overnight,
Speaker 1: and it'll be widespread. Channel nine says thirty ninth to
Speaker 1: the well on Friday, we're gonna get sporadic rain. Cold
Speaker 1: front shown up sometime in the afternoon. High in the
Speaker 1: upper fifties. Right now thirty nine degrees. Time for a
Speaker 1: traffic update, Chuck Ingram.
Speaker 2: From the UCL Traffic Center. Expect more do you see help,
Speaker 2: more clinical trials, more treatment options for personalized care, more
Speaker 2: chances to get you back to being you visit U
Speaker 2: see health dot com. Reres and clear on southbound seventy
Speaker 2: five a few more minutes before the backups clear out.
Speaker 2: Still a bit heavy between Tythosville and Cincinnati Dayton and
Speaker 2: then out of Evendale through the lock when split inbound
Speaker 2: seventy four, just a bit slow from Montana. Southbound seventy
Speaker 2: one is an extra fifteen minutes between Fields Irtle and Redbank.
Speaker 2: There's a wreck on Westwood just before you get to Harrison,
Speaker 2: coming up next to guest who is going to finish
Speaker 2: this interview and then head to Orbyando to represent the
Speaker 2: Giants in the Pro Bowl. Still unknown if the judge
Speaker 2: will actually be playing playing football or not. Chuck Ingram
Speaker 2: on fifty five k r SEND Talk Station.
Speaker 1: Eight thirty and fifty five kre CD talk station, Judge Editapolitano,
Speaker 1: I have no idea what the hell Chuck Ingram's talking about,
Speaker 1: which quite often is the case, is he introduces you
Speaker 1: to the fifty five Carcy Morning Show. Welcome back, my
Speaker 1: dear friend. It is always a distinct honor and pleasure
Speaker 1: to have you on my show.
Speaker 3: Well, it's always a pleasure to be with you, even
Speaker 3: if I don't know what the hell he's talking about.
Speaker 1: I have mentioned before and I am not accusing him
Speaker 1: of smoking weed, but it is legal in the state
Speaker 1: of Ohio now, so maybe that's an explanation, but we'll
Speaker 1: just let that sit. In the meantime, I am a
Speaker 1: fortunate man, not only because I get to talk to
Speaker 1: Judge Edita Polaitano and welcome him to you the listening audience.
Speaker 1: Everyone's at this time, but I get a column in advance.
Speaker 1: It comes out tonight at midnight as it does every week,
Speaker 1: and the column titled a Republic of Spies interesting and
Speaker 1: excellent observations. As always, your honor, what's the story on
Speaker 1: this one, sir?
Speaker 4: Well, you know, one of the few good things that
Speaker 4: Joe Biden did was to warn the country about something
Speaker 4: called zero click. Oh yeah, which is you and I
Speaker 4: talked about this, and then he banned zero click from
Speaker 4: being imported into the United States used in the United States.
Speaker 4: And he ordered the FBI, which had purchased zero Click,
Speaker 4: which I'll explain in a second under the Trump administration,
Speaker 4: most likely without telling President Trump, he ordered them not
Speaker 4: to use it. And it is stored sounds like the Sopranos.
Speaker 4: It's stored in a warehouse in New Jersey. Zero click
Speaker 4: is an insidious piece of software that allows the possessor
Speaker 4: of it to enter your electronic device without you having
Speaker 4: to be tricked into clicking onto a link.
Speaker 3: Okay, so far, so good.
Speaker 4: What's bad is that Donald Trump, who was victimized by
Speaker 4: zero click, has told Benjamin Natanyahu he's going to lift
Speaker 4: the embargo on it and the Israeli company can begin
Speaker 4: selling it to American governments.
Speaker 3: This is an absolute violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Speaker 4: It's shocking that President Trump, who was victimized by all
Speaker 4: of this the first time.
Speaker 3: Around, would be doing it.
Speaker 4: Well, that's where we are, and that's what leaked out
Speaker 4: last week, and that's why I wrote it.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 4: You're not going to see this in writing anywhere. This
Speaker 4: is part of a side deal between the American negotiator,
Speaker 4: Steve Whitcoff, and the Israeli Prime Minister to induce him
Speaker 4: to accept the so called ceasefire between Hamas and Israel.
Speaker 3: Don't worry.
Speaker 4: When this is over, you can resume selling zero click,
Speaker 4: which is a big deal to the Israeli government and
Speaker 4: a big deal to Israeli industry and is devastating for
Speaker 4: American privacy.
Speaker 3: It's devastating for privacy in the White House. They can
Speaker 3: use zero click on Trump himself.
Speaker 1: Do you know the motivations Trump has to lift this ban?
Speaker 1: Because I mean that the Israelis could sell it to us.
Speaker 1: They have other allies in the world they could just
Speaker 1: as easily sell it. I don't know the French government
Speaker 1: or something, which means everybody is open to having this
Speaker 1: thing exploited.
Speaker 3: I don't know why zero click entered the picture.
Speaker 4: I do know that mister Whitkoff, a billionaire real estate developer,
Speaker 4: enormously successful, and who's negotiating skills obviously have impressed the
Speaker 4: President did put together the ceasefire in the last minute
Speaker 4: of the Biden administration. Mister Widcoff accomplished more in a
Speaker 4: week than Tony B. Lincoln and company were able to
Speaker 4: accomplish in two years. However, they must have needed something
Speaker 4: to cushion the blow. Prime Minister Nettigna, whose people must
Speaker 4: have asked for this and without realizing the catastrophic consequences
Speaker 4: of it. The Trump people, and again this happened before
Speaker 4: he was president. The Trump people said, yes, I don't
Speaker 4: know if he has yet lifted the embargo, but he
Speaker 4: promised Prime Minister Netzahu, who's visiting here next week, that
Speaker 4: he would do so.
Speaker 1: In whose hands would this nefarious software reside, It's CIA, NSA,
Speaker 1: it TSA, and what lettered agency of government would have
Speaker 1: control over this if it's back in Probably probably.
Speaker 3: All of them.
Speaker 4: But what provoked Joe Biden was when he learned that
Speaker 4: the FBI purchase this, and then Chris Ray admitted they
Speaker 4: were purchasing, but denied they.
Speaker 3: Were using it.
Speaker 4: He said, we purchased it in order to see how
Speaker 4: it works. Well, nobody really believed that at all. He
Speaker 4: actually said that in testifying before Congress. Biden didn't believe him.
Speaker 4: The members of Congress didn't believe him. Biden ordered the
Speaker 4: FBI not to use it. He should have ordered them
Speaker 4: to destroy it. It's not destroyed, as I said, It's
Speaker 4: in a warehouse in New Jersey. Anybody in the government
Speaker 4: that gets their hands on this will have instantaneous access
Speaker 4: to the contents of your digital device, whether it's a
Speaker 4: mobile device, a.
Speaker 3: Desktop, a laptop, or a mainframe.
Speaker 4: Anybody in the government that has access to this will
Speaker 4: also have access to anybody else's digital device, including the President,
Speaker 4: the head of the FBI, the Secretary of State, the
Speaker 4: Attorney General of the United States. There is no yet
Speaker 4: known way to resist zero click other than by banning it.
Speaker 1: Well, it's bad enough that they can get that information
Speaker 1: without a warrant, And I guess the only consolation we
Speaker 1: have on this is that they wouldn't be able to
Speaker 1: use information acquired by zero click unless they had a
Speaker 1: warrant and then use zero click to get the information
Speaker 1: off of our devices. But the predicate for that would
Speaker 1: be a warrant. So if they gather information and they
Speaker 1: endeavored to present it in a court of law, you
Speaker 1: could move to suppress it on the grounds that they
Speaker 1: violated our Fourth Amendment rights. But I view that as
Speaker 1: a small yes.
Speaker 3: Yes.
Speaker 4: Last week, a federal judge in New York suppressed evidence
Speaker 4: that the FBI acquired under.
Speaker 3: Section seven two. Seven two is the section.
Speaker 4: The five so that it allows warrantless spying on foreign
Speaker 4: persons and the Americans with whom they communicate, and then
Speaker 4: it puts all of that in the database and it
Speaker 4: allows the FBI access to the database. If federal judge
Speaker 4: ruled that FBI access to that database without a search
Speaker 4: warrant is a violation of the Fourth ammbents the first
Speaker 4: time I'm aware of the suppression of any evidence obtained
Speaker 4: in that way. So maybe things are beginning to turn around,
Speaker 4: but not if zero click becomes.
Speaker 1: Prevalent well in addition to information. And I'm glad you
Speaker 1: brought that case up because when I saw it, I
Speaker 1: was hopeful that you and I might have a conversation
Speaker 1: about it, because we have been waiting and waiting for
Speaker 1: an opportunity for someone to make that exact argument in court,
Speaker 1: the problem has been standing or in your particular case,
Speaker 1: because you know that they've used fives that to spy
Speaker 1: on you, for example, they haven't tried to use it
Speaker 1: against you, so you don't have a vehicle to go
Speaker 1: to court to argue that it's unconstitutional. But I was
Speaker 1: happy to see that decision. But does that also not
Speaker 1: point out that there has been a civil rights violation
Speaker 1: and they could sue the government for a civil rights
Speaker 1: violation and maybe get some maybe a symbolic compensation for that.
Speaker 4: Short answer is, yes, there are a massive civil rights violations.
Speaker 4: But again, if they don't attempt to use this evidence
Speaker 4: against you, you won't even know. The journalists who tried
Speaker 4: to commence a class action saying we're journalists, we know
Speaker 4: they're spying on us, and this is a violation of
Speaker 4: our civil rights. Those cases were thrown out and Supreme
Speaker 4: Court refused to hear the appeal because they don't have standing.
Speaker 4: There was no injury in fact as yet. So because
Speaker 4: of this standing interpretation in the Constitution, the government must.
Speaker 3: Actually harm you first.
Speaker 4: Before you have the ability to challenge the means by
Speaker 4: which it acquired the evidence against you. But God only
Speaker 4: knows what they'll do with zero click. It just boggles
Speaker 4: my mind. Trump and Whitcoff must have just said yes
Speaker 4: to that without talking to any technical people, because this
Speaker 4: really really opens up Pandora's box. It opens up the
Speaker 4: President himself and his closest advisors to being spied upon
Speaker 4: by Masad by the FBI whoever has the zero click.
Speaker 3: Now, the zero click is not here yet.
Speaker 4: I don't believe the embargo has actually been lifted. He
Speaker 4: has promised to lift it. Congress should get involved.
Speaker 1: Someone might want to ask Telsey Gabbart about that, your
Speaker 1: honor anyhow well, yeah.
Speaker 4: You know, she continues to befuddle me. I don't know
Speaker 4: what's going to happen. Her hearing, I believe is Thursday.
Speaker 3: Yes, she has done.
Speaker 4: A one eighty on many of her protections of privacy.
Speaker 4: I don't know if that's enough to dissuade Republicans who
Speaker 4: are big government and in favor of spying from voting
Speaker 4: against her.
Speaker 1: Well, time will certainly tell you know, honest that Masade
Speaker 1: has this software and it works without anybody knowing it's
Speaker 1: being used. I mean, they're probably using it right now,
Speaker 1: you know, just because we aren't using it. They've got
Speaker 1: the technology. They're probably just tapping into anybody's phone calls
Speaker 1: and devices that they feel like they want to tap into.
Speaker 3: Well, no doubt.
Speaker 4: I mean from their perspective, it's efficient and inexpensive and flawless.
Speaker 4: They don't care about the fourth of moment. They're not
Speaker 4: the subject.
Speaker 1: To it, and they're in lies the challenge, Judge Enanopolitano,
Speaker 1: it's judging freedoms. The podcast. Got to search for that online,
Speaker 1: you'll find it. Who you're gonna be talking to today,
Speaker 1: your honor.
Speaker 4: Oh, I have a Professor Jeffrey Sachs and Colonel Douglas
Speaker 4: McGregor on today, two of my heaviest hitters, as well
Speaker 4: as Phil Giraldi and Aaron Matey.
Speaker 3: Oh.
Speaker 4: And at eleven o'clock this morning Eastern Live from Ukraine,
Speaker 4: Patrick Lancaster, the independent American journalist who goes right into
Speaker 4: the belly of the beast. He just got back from Kursk.
Speaker 4: That's the area of Russia invaded by and still occupied
Speaker 4: by Ukrainian forces, although the forces are rapidly diminishing in
Speaker 4: number and effectiveness.
Speaker 1: Yes, heard about that yesterday from Daniel Davis, retired lieutenant colonel.
Speaker 1: They can't keep the manpower on the front lines and
Speaker 1: the numbers are diminishing, not looking very good for Ukraine.
Speaker 1: It's going to be interesting to see how that is resolved,
Speaker 1: if it is find Judge Ennita Polatano judging Freedom Online. Judge.
Speaker 1: Always a real pleasure to have you on the show,
Speaker 1: my friend. I thoroughly enjoy our conversation.
Speaker 4: Matter what Ingram says, it's a pleasure. I love these
Speaker 4: Wednesday mornings.
Speaker 1: We always let them know. Take care of my friend.
Speaker 1: We'll talk next Wednesday. Best of health. Hey forty one,
Speaker 1: right now, if you have cares the talk stays and
Speaker 1: don't go away. I'll be right back. Fifty five KRC,
Speaker 1: the talk station