Speaker 1: November seven, twenty twenty four, allegedly, according to that thing
Speaker 1: we call a calendar, it is Thursday as I speak
Speaker 1: to you alive from that place we used to call America,
Speaker 1: where Trump has been selected as the what is it
Speaker 1: the forty seventh, Yes, the forty seventh president, and he
Speaker 1: was the forty fifth president, which makes him only the
Speaker 1: second president in history, next to Grover Cleveland deb two
Speaker 1: non consecutive terms in the office. Everybody got that. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's where we're at. So are we feeling depressed? Are
Speaker 1: we feeling down? Maybe? But doesn't have anything to do
Speaker 1: with trumps selection. And I do mean selection with an s.
Speaker 1: You know what, I'm one of the few people who
Speaker 1: predicted it, and also predicted your razor thin margins and
Speaker 1: all that crap was also crap. Turns out I was
Speaker 1: right about that. Let's see what I'll be right about next,
Speaker 1: and let's see what I'll be wrong about, because apparently
Speaker 1: I'll be wrong about a few things. It's interesting. Uh,
Speaker 1: I've gotten reactions from a few people, and we're gonna
Speaker 1: cover some news stories tonight, no guest, but I'll take
Speaker 1: you listening to me. If you're hearing me live on
Speaker 1: a Thursday. If you're hearing me, like, let's see, what
Speaker 1: is it? Almost four minutes after the hour of eight
Speaker 1: pm Eastern. I'm only gonna go until right around nine tonight,
Speaker 1: just one full hour, cover a couple of news stories,
Speaker 1: and hopefully get some calls from you at three one
Speaker 1: nine five two seven five zero one six. That's right.
Speaker 1: I'm taking calls tonight. Aaron will be live on Friday.
Speaker 1: I don't know if he's gonna take calls, but I
Speaker 1: know Uncle will if he's with him. Three one nine
Speaker 1: five two seven five zero one six. That is the
Speaker 1: number to call. Let me give it to you slow.
Speaker 1: Three one nine five two seven five zero one six.
Speaker 1: That's right. That's the number to call if you want
Speaker 1: to join in and tell me how it is you
Speaker 1: are taking to this idea that Kama Law didn't make it,
Speaker 1: that Trump is in again? Are you happy? Are you thrilled?
Speaker 1: Are you nervous? Are you worried? Are you thinking? It
Speaker 1: doesn't really matter? You know, I guess it depends on
Speaker 1: who you are and what you were thinking beforehand before
Speaker 1: Tuesday Tearsday came up. And I take note that thus far,
Speaker 1: I haven't heard a lot about anybody trying to cheat
Speaker 1: or steal ballads or anything outside of Greg Palaced put
Speaker 1: out an article which supports his concept, and he was
Speaker 1: saying all along that Trump was going to steal the election.
Speaker 1: By the way, that's the only guy who put that
Speaker 1: out that I've seen so far. Now, I have heard
Speaker 1: from a few of you who have different views, and
Speaker 1: I do mean very different views about this entire thing.
Speaker 1: And some people might expect you you're very anti Trump jock.
Speaker 1: You probably are really pissed, and I'm not because I'm
Speaker 1: not surprised in the least. Why am I not surprised? Well,
Speaker 1: that might be a different story than what the rest
Speaker 1: of the world is seeing, hearing, thinking, feeling. It might be.
Speaker 1: And I do mean the rest of the world that
Speaker 1: wasn't happy with this guy coming in. But seems as
Speaker 1: though he nailed down the popular vote. Seems as though
Speaker 1: wait a minute, folks, he might have control of both
Speaker 1: of the houses of Congress, right the House of Representatives
Speaker 1: and the Senate. That might be a possibility. Hey, plus
Speaker 1: Supreme Court rather favorable to the Trumpster. Looks like all
Speaker 1: three branches of government now facing in one direction, and
Speaker 1: it won't be like twenty seventeen and eighteen, where he
Speaker 1: did have the Congress on his side, right his first
Speaker 1: two years of his term, Congress was on his side.
Speaker 1: But people told me no, Democrats resisted him. Know what
Speaker 1: they were accurate about is not only did Democrats resist them,
Speaker 1: but there were Republicans that were resisting him back then.
Speaker 1: Since that first selection in twenty sixteen, Trump has done
Speaker 1: what become the GOP Party. He wasn't in that, you know,
Speaker 1: they claimed he's an outsider and all this other BS
Speaker 1: I told you was BS back then, and he was
Speaker 1: definitely worthy of being a producer of content for all
Speaker 1: kinds of media and on and on. Oh, by the way,
Speaker 1: there's a theory out there that if Kamala had done
Speaker 1: Joe Rogan much like Trump was willing to do, and
Speaker 1: if Kamala had recruited somebody else who was big in
Speaker 1: social media, like Elon Musk, she might have stood a chance.
Speaker 1: But I say no, because she was a crap candidate,
Speaker 1: pretty much like the Hillary thing in twenty sixteen. It
Speaker 1: wasn't just that Trump was great, it was that Hillary
Speaker 1: was crap too. So you know, whether you count the
Speaker 1: selection process as legitimate or not, it's irrelevant when you
Speaker 1: couldn't possibly sell dog crap versus you know, whatever's on
Speaker 1: the other side. At least it's a walking talking something.
Speaker 1: And of course Trump's you know, speech, the way he
Speaker 1: talks about things sounds a lot more familiar to people
Speaker 1: just in general. Even if you don't like the policies
Speaker 1: or you don't understand how the government works, you might
Speaker 1: identify those patterns of speech because they sound a lot
Speaker 1: more like you and people you know, as opposed to
Speaker 1: happy happy joy Joy over there, who was just trying
Speaker 1: to tell you, I'm just enthusiastic and ready to do
Speaker 1: things differently, even though I've never accomplished anything before, and
Speaker 1: nobody would even vote for me when I was a
Speaker 1: primary candidate, and the King and the Democratic side blah
Speaker 1: blah blah. And of course I have to not say
Speaker 1: anything bad about sleepy Joe. Sleepy Joe, you know, sleeping
Speaker 1: is one thing. Demented Joe maybe, But anyway, were they
Speaker 1: hiding that? Was it? Because Joe held on too long
Speaker 1: trying to pretend he could run for pres Still can we
Speaker 1: point the blame at that? How about point the blame
Speaker 1: at this? This is actually what the majority wanted among
Speaker 1: the voting population, it might actually be true. I don't
Speaker 1: get a sense that there was a large stolen selection
Speaker 1: this time. I actually get a sense, and I said
Speaker 1: it over and over again, that this is a guy
Speaker 1: had strong enough support among his base and kept people
Speaker 1: nervous that it was gonna be razor sharp, so they
Speaker 1: actually went out and voted for him. Okay, this isn't
Speaker 1: like you had to manufacture numbers entirely. I mean, there
Speaker 1: might have been some manipulations here or there, but I mean,
Speaker 1: what else is new in any election? I mean, I
Speaker 1: seem to find problems with the legitimacy of any election
Speaker 1: if you dig hard enough going back I don't know
Speaker 1: about half of my life. That stuff seems to be
Speaker 1: easily proven since two thousand. Now. It doesn't mean I'm
Speaker 1: gonna look deny her and I think that the twenty
Speaker 1: twenty election was stolen her. No, but there's always going
Speaker 1: to be problems, and there always was problems. And besides that,
Speaker 1: whether the legitimate vote count is intact or not, do
Speaker 1: these people ever represent you? Do they ever represent the
Speaker 1: people they actually vote for, or do they just play
Speaker 1: games to trick you into thinking that they're supporting stuff?
Speaker 1: That's on your side. Well, we could have discussions about
Speaker 1: that all day, but I now have to have an
Speaker 1: open mind if I'm going to analyze politics at all
Speaker 1: over the next few years, especially considering that the way
Speaker 1: I see it is for two years, we're going to
Speaker 1: deal with a GOP completely responsible for everything in the
Speaker 1: government allegedly, right. I mean, if they have the House,
Speaker 1: and they have the Senate, and they effectively have control
Speaker 1: of the Supreme Court, plus Trump is in command of
Speaker 1: the executive branch, that means that everything that goes right
Speaker 1: is to their credit, and everything that goes wrong is
Speaker 1: their problem. They're not going to be able to blame
Speaker 1: the extreme leftists for very much. If they can outvote
Speaker 1: and outvote every single thing that they have, the Democrats
Speaker 1: end up effectively with no power on balance, right, So
Speaker 1: whose credit will it be? It'll be theirs. Whose fault
Speaker 1: will it be? It'll be theirs. Now, are people going
Speaker 1: to go into the magic time where they ignore things
Speaker 1: that are collapsing and eating up at society like they
Speaker 1: did during the Reagan era. People didn't want to pay
Speaker 1: attention to certain things that were destroying entire communities, that
Speaker 1: were ripping up parts of America, no problem, because we
Speaker 1: all felt good because Ronnie Reagan told us it was
Speaker 1: all going to be okay, and it was the eighties
Speaker 1: and you had the opportunity to prove to the world
Speaker 1: that American greed was good and it was the eighties
Speaker 1: and cocaine was the drug of the realm. Did that
Speaker 1: matter at the time? Does it matter today? Do you
Speaker 1: care about it anymore? Probably not? But either way, it's
Speaker 1: all on them. So once again, I'm willing to take
Speaker 1: your calls. I've got a couple of news stories. Like
Speaker 1: I said, I might take a break just real fast
Speaker 1: to organize myself. But I mean, honestly, I want to
Speaker 1: talk to you about what this all means. Can we
Speaker 1: get an idea what the future is actually going to be?
Speaker 1: I mean, I see the initial prognostications coming out of
Speaker 1: the corporate electronic media, the corporate you know, broadcast media
Speaker 1: as it stands, you know, And I don't just mean
Speaker 1: tune over to MSNBC and all that good crap, and
Speaker 1: Chris Cuomo out there telling you that he was the
Speaker 1: only one who had an objective network, you know, because
Speaker 1: News Nation wasn't leaning one way or the other, he claimed,
Speaker 1: as they were covering this selection, but every other network
Speaker 1: was now was every network lean in certain directions? Certainly
Speaker 1: they were what else is old? But his CNN as
Speaker 1: liberal as they said they were going to be, is
Speaker 1: MSNBC anything other than a place for Rachel Madcow to
Speaker 1: be out there. Rachel mad Cow whoops mad out. That
Speaker 1: was a mistake, but kind of rhymes. Anyways, she was
Speaker 1: doing her thing, CBS was doing their thing. We checked
Speaker 1: in on it live and loud when BP was on
Speaker 1: here and kept track of what was happening. And I
Speaker 1: called that race pretty early compared to everybody else who
Speaker 1: was still looking at it way later in the night
Speaker 1: and waiting for Trump to get to that magic two seventy.
Speaker 1: But anyway you slice it, he had no problem reaching
Speaker 1: the two seventy for electoral votes, the colleges his, and
Speaker 1: apparently the popular vote is his. So what does that
Speaker 1: mean if you're somebody who finds him, his policies, his behavior,
Speaker 1: Oh a lot of no, no, dah, blah blah, all of
Speaker 1: that objectionable. A. You're not happy, but B you need
Speaker 1: to face the fact here, and that is that the
Speaker 1: majority of people that you encounter in your nation, in
Speaker 1: the place where you live. The majority of them, whether
Speaker 1: it's a huge majority or slim one, depending on where
Speaker 1: you live, are in favor of this guy, his policies,
Speaker 1: his rhetoric. At the very least popularity, they're choosing him.
Speaker 1: And they did it not simply because of brainwashing. Let's
Speaker 1: be honest. There are some people. They didn't just pick
Speaker 1: them because they're idiots. They picked them because they liked
Speaker 1: what they heard, they liked what they saw. They wanted
Speaker 1: to pick the guy who had the grievance. Why, because
Speaker 1: they're commiserating with their grievances. They have grievances, so does he.
Speaker 1: The grievances wind up having similar villains, and it's interesting
Speaker 1: who those villains are and why, and what the solutions
Speaker 1: are to dealing with all those villains. I take note
Speaker 1: that the opioid crisis is apparently no longer a crisis,
Speaker 1: you know, considering what was being discussed during the presidential selection,
Speaker 1: you know, for Potus and all that. Did you hear
Speaker 1: about opioid crisis during that at all? Did it even
Speaker 1: come up? I don't think it did. So. Anyway, I've
Speaker 1: got some of these interesting articles and I'm thinking I'll
Speaker 1: get through them, in rapid fire fashion. I've got actually
Speaker 1: five of them lined up, but I'm hoping that some
Speaker 1: of you guys decide to call in as we move forward.
Speaker 1: Three one nine, five two seven, five zero one six.
Speaker 1: That is the number to call. And if you don't
Speaker 1: join me, I've got plenty to say anyway, up until
Speaker 1: nine pm Eastern, when I'm going to cut this off.
Speaker 1: I got another recording to do, I got a few
Speaker 1: things I got to get to today, and uh, you
Speaker 1: know what, I'm only going to do this broadcast just
Speaker 1: for this hour. Of course, we'll still do the open
Speaker 1: lines on Friday, at least for this week. But don't
Speaker 1: forget I'm only, as I speak to you, let's see,
Speaker 1: fifteen days away from when I should be in Dallas
Speaker 1: on a Friday night and not doing a show as
Speaker 1: far as I know, because I'll be the MC at
Speaker 1: the Lancer Conference. So let's not forget about that. But
Speaker 1: I'm not going to promote it today all that much,
Speaker 1: just to say that it is on the twenty second November.
Speaker 1: And if you go to Assassination Conference dot com, even
Speaker 1: if you want to attend virtually, so to speak, you
Speaker 1: can do that. Assassination Conference dot com and use the
Speaker 1: code Ocelli ten for ten percent off of your ticket.
Speaker 1: Student prices are available and all that good stuff, but
Speaker 1: you got to show some proof that you're a student,
Speaker 1: and in person prices are a bit different. But if
Speaker 1: you can get to Dallas, Texas, okay, and get to
Speaker 1: the Marriotte Downtown in Dallas, Texas, which is the hotel
Speaker 1: it's going to be held at, I strongly advise you
Speaker 1: to come on down and check it out. A lot
Speaker 1: of interesting things are going to happen in person and
Speaker 1: virtually at the twenty twenty five JFK Lancer Conference November
Speaker 1: in Dallas, twenty twenty four. I think it's the twenty
Speaker 1: seventh time that they're doing this too. So anyway, it
Speaker 1: is what it is, and I'll be the MC and
Speaker 1: that makes things different. I'll have some special items with
Speaker 1: me and all that stuff which I'm going to be
Speaker 1: selling to trying to, you know, make guess money to get.
Speaker 2: Home with.
Speaker 1: And all that while I'm in Dallas and missus oh,
Speaker 1: and Frankie'll be with me. So you know, you want
Speaker 1: to come and meet the family at the JFK conference,
Speaker 1: you can do that. They're probably going to hang out
Speaker 1: by the table some and then disappear to go do
Speaker 1: something else in Dallas while I amc the conference. I'm
Speaker 1: happily looking forward to that. I was not happily looking
Speaker 1: forward to this selection. But here we are the day after,
Speaker 1: and what is the fallout? Is there a legitimate thing
Speaker 1: that we need to worry about? Are we going into
Speaker 1: panic mode? Are you going into panic mode? I've got
Speaker 1: a hard time actually getting a barometric reading on my listeners.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you about some of the reactions and messages
Speaker 1: I've got regarding the selections so far. You guys are
Speaker 1: an interesting bunch, I'll tell you that. And I'm not
Speaker 1: sure necessarily where the majority of you are actually coming from,
Speaker 1: except I suspect the majority of the people listening to me,
Speaker 1: believe it or not, are Trump supporters actually one way
Speaker 1: or another. They may not be passionate, but in some
Speaker 1: cases they are passionate. But the majority of you or
Speaker 1: Trump supporters. So guess what. I'm not going to do
Speaker 1: argue with you. I want to hear from you. Why
Speaker 1: what it is. Let's get to the baseline. Don't give
Speaker 1: me the bull crap about things that don't really affect you,
Speaker 1: and the rhetoric that you've been told to parrot in
Speaker 1: all seriousness, Tell me why in your gut you would
Speaker 1: ignore things that would bother you about others, you know,
Speaker 1: felony convictions and whatnot, his bad time in court, accused
Speaker 1: of different bad acts, etc. Etc. The fact that he's
Speaker 1: a rich guy who was clearly exploited poor people before, etc. Etc.
Speaker 1: Why doesn't it bother you when it comes to Trump?
Speaker 1: Or is it all fair game and you don't care
Speaker 1: about people that get exploited so long as it's not you,
Speaker 1: or do you think that's all a figment of the
Speaker 1: liberal media's imagination and the bs from the courts, Well,
Speaker 1: the courts have all been against him, except the ones
Speaker 1: where he installs the judges. The courts are all against
Speaker 1: him just for political reasons, and they were trying to
Speaker 1: undermine him for the selection that just happened, which, by
Speaker 1: the way, if that's the case, turning the whole government
Speaker 1: against him didn't work, because they said they weaponized the
Speaker 1: whole government against him didn't work very well. Because here
Speaker 1: we are. Trump is going to be sworn in as
Speaker 1: the forty seventh president. What day is inauguration day? Anyway?
Speaker 1: Sometime in January. It'll happen. That's just the way things
Speaker 1: are planned at the moment, And it looks to me like,
Speaker 1: I don't know, Democrats are not crying too much foul.
Speaker 1: They are pointing fingers at each other and forming their
Speaker 1: circular fire squads as usual, but they're not blaming each other,
Speaker 1: and they're not saying Trump stole it. With the exception
Speaker 1: of Greg Pallace, Whoho is out there with the what
Speaker 1: looks to me like it's going to be a Trump
Speaker 1: stole it argument. I think nobody's going to pay attention
Speaker 1: to him though, And I'm not even sure I buy
Speaker 1: that Trump stole anything now where things manipulated so that
Speaker 1: he would be to my understanding, it was set up
Speaker 1: this way. Think about it. I mean, if you set
Speaker 1: up the alleged opposition to fail, that's a good way
Speaker 1: to set up the guy you picked to succeed. Was
Speaker 1: that done intentionally or is it just that haphazard? Is
Speaker 1: it just the stupidity of Biden hanging around too long
Speaker 1: until somebody allowed him to go on stage and make
Speaker 1: the fatal mistake of revealing exactly how disconnected from reality
Speaker 1: and connected to senility he was, is will be Was
Speaker 1: that just an error in judgment or was that done intentionally?
Speaker 1: Is Kamala the selection in order to make sure that
Speaker 1: there's no way that somebody could be Trump because she
Speaker 1: can't even get the nomination or begin to survive what
Speaker 1: more than I don't know, one or two primaries when
Speaker 1: she tried in uh what was that twenty twenty she tried?
Speaker 1: I guess she tried when Biden was coming in, right.
Speaker 1: Couldn't survive even a couple of primaries. So how is
Speaker 1: she going to get the vote across the board? I
Speaker 1: mean again, assuming that the whole voting situation is really
Speaker 1: legit all the way across. Interesting anyway, how do I
Speaker 1: feel about this? Who cares? I would love to hear
Speaker 1: from you. And I'm going to read a few stories
Speaker 1: and get a handle on what I think are some
Speaker 1: of the unique little twists and turns on this that
Speaker 1: are not typical. And other people are gonna tell me
Speaker 1: this and that is being represented in the media, and
Speaker 1: probably again it's gonna be an impression that they dreamed
Speaker 1: up in their own heads before they ever even bothered
Speaker 1: to go look at what people are saying, because I'm
Speaker 1: telling you, it's really weird. Out there right now. They're
Speaker 1: trying to blame somebody within the Democratic apparatus or whatever
Speaker 1: for Kamala's loss. I mean not her, mind you, but
Speaker 1: but other people that made poor decisions, and in some
Speaker 1: circles Joe Biden for not getting out of the way sooner.
Speaker 1: But would it have mattered anyway? I don't know. I
Speaker 1: leave that question to you, and I'm gonna leave a
Speaker 1: lot of questions to you, and you can join me
Speaker 1: at three one nine, five two seven, five zero one
Speaker 1: six three one nine five two seven five zero one
Speaker 1: six and I'm gonna get straight to some news stories
Speaker 1: after a quick break, which will contain just the this
Speaker 1: on the Olly Effect here on a Thursday night, stick.
Speaker 2: Around, yo, yo.
Speaker 3: This Doug Campbell, host of the Dallas Action podcast presented
Speaker 3: by Wall Street Window. And you are listening to the
Speaker 3: o'chill effect revelation through conversation.
Speaker 1: At the day right, Well, what do you want to know.
Speaker 4: Baker's wild claim Oswal girlfriends he knew Ruby and Barry
Speaker 4: cancer weapons.
Speaker 1: Really, I imagine I could claim I have four wheels. It
Speaker 1: doesn't make me a wagon.
Speaker 4: But okay, I'm building and trying to prevent the murder
Speaker 4: of John Kennedy. Come on, now, has it real?
Speaker 5: For on the DAFA assassination.
Speaker 1: Go to Amazon dot com enter Judith Baker in her
Speaker 1: own words. You'll get the results for a digital copy
Speaker 1: of a book where Walt Brown utilizes her own words
Speaker 1: and the known evidence in the case to get at
Speaker 1: well a different perspective. Let's say you can get Judith
Speaker 1: Barry Baker in her own words from the author himself,
Speaker 1: signed if you request it by contacting doctor Brown at
Speaker 1: kias jfk at aol dot com. It's a fun book
Speaker 1: and it actually dissects the many, many fantastic claims Judithbary
Speaker 1: Baker in her own words.
Speaker 4: Thank you for all the great information.
Speaker 5: The War State by Michael Swanson explains the great national
Speaker 5: transformation that took place and put the Kennedy presidency in
Speaker 5: the context of the times and reveals never before published
Speaker 5: information about the Cuban missile crisis. President Kennedy would not
Speaker 5: have been assassinated if he had been president two hundred
Speaker 5: years ago. His assassination took place in the context of
Speaker 5: the Cold War and the rise of the national security state.
Speaker 2: Before World War II, the.
Speaker 5: United States was a continental republic in the decade that
Speaker 5: followed it became an imperial superpower. Generals such as Curtis
Speaker 5: LeMay not only wanted to invade Cuba, but knew that
Speaker 5: there were short range missiles on the island aren't with
Speaker 5: nuclear warheads that they could not destroy because they were
Speaker 5: on mobile launchers. Their invasion could have led to a
Speaker 5: Third World War, and they wanted to go to war anyway.
Speaker 5: The War State by Michael Swanson reveals why and will
Speaker 5: show you what President Kennedy was up against. For more information,
Speaker 5: The Warstate dot com the.
Speaker 1: US expressed by callers, schools, there anyone else who happens
Speaker 1: to get on the air of Jelly dot com not
Speaker 1: necessarily reflect the views of Jelly dot Com ord Joe Chilly,
Speaker 1: and we are not responsible. We're in stupidity, which might
Speaker 1: ensue ping.
Speaker 6: In Denial The Secret Wars with air strikes and Tanks
Speaker 6: by Larry Hancock. Secret wars became a staple of US
Speaker 6: covert operations and are still happening today. Larry Hancock's book
Speaker 6: In Denial rips the cover off many of them, using
Speaker 6: new files.
Speaker 7: It exposes things about the Bay of Pigs that no
Speaker 7: one has ever written about before. It shows why it
Speaker 7: really failed and why the United States did not earn
Speaker 7: from it. It also shows why other countries today are
Speaker 7: doing secret operations with more success. This is the book
Speaker 7: that puts what some want to deny into the light.
Speaker 7: In Denial Secret Wars with air strikes and tanks Larryhncock.
Speaker 7: For more information, go to Larry hyphen Handcock dot com.
Speaker 1: Pick up your copy of In.
Speaker 7: Denial at Amazon dot com in digital or physical.
Speaker 8: Who Chili dot com. Revelation through conversation. Do you like history?
Speaker 8: Real history that you were never taught in schools? Why
Speaker 8: the Vietnam War, Nuclear Bombs and nation Building in Southeast
Speaker 8: Asia by author Mike Swanson, with new documentation never seen
Speaker 8: before that will open your eyes to events that led
Speaker 8: up to this. Why the Vietnam War, Nuclear Bombs in
Speaker 8: Nation Building in Southeast Asia nineteen forty five through nineteen
Speaker 8: sixty one. Get your copy today at Amazon dot com.
Speaker 8: Why the Vietnam War by author Mike Swatson.
Speaker 2: Let them know, Let them know. Let no, You got
Speaker 2: to let them know.
Speaker 1: I'm bringing all.
Speaker 9: Shock, I can care.
Speaker 2: Rocksping Burlad at.
Speaker 3: The drug Show.
Speaker 9: I'm bringing all shot, I can care rocks sipping blight
Speaker 9: at the draft show. The wone has met that the
Speaker 9: world's worst professional prolocka tour tip them like it's two
Speaker 9: thousand something and Becket's back on tour.
Speaker 2: You never really wanted me anyway. Alcohol turns me into
Speaker 2: the enemies. I'm go seventy stand with some annessy. I
Speaker 2: used to think that bottle was the remedy.
Speaker 9: Picked it up off once or twice after I let
Speaker 9: it go, but finally had the letter be I used
Speaker 9: to roll over a fat ditch, she dear me and
Speaker 9: left tip for some letter recy I mean literally, I figured.
Speaker 8: Letter dot com Radio network.
Speaker 2: Nuclear holocaust.
Speaker 1: You know what uranium is, right?
Speaker 9: Thing called nuclear weapons and other things like lots of
Speaker 9: you know what ranium is?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 6: Bad things things?
Speaker 8: Oh, Chili dot com.
Speaker 1: Segment number two and looking for you. If you're gonna
Speaker 1: call in on the phone lines three one nine five
Speaker 1: two seven five zero one six. That's three one nine
Speaker 1: five two seven five zero one six and you join
Speaker 1: me after this. That is the things I'm about to
Speaker 1: read to you. Let's get to a couple of headlines quickly,
Speaker 1: you know in Bloomberg. This headline caught my attention and
Speaker 1: I wanted to see what people thought about this. Podcasts
Speaker 1: didn't decide this election, but they helped. This is in
Speaker 1: Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot com. You know what, I'll
Speaker 1: put the links in the live Ocelli chat room if
Speaker 1: you don't mind out there, and let you follow along
Speaker 1: if you want to check in with me. And also
Speaker 1: it'll be in with the show notes on this podcast
Speaker 1: when I posted. But anyways, yeah, Bloomberg dot com, I
Speaker 1: gave you the headline. But let's take a look at
Speaker 1: the article and read from it really quick. With the
Speaker 1: US election coming to a surprisingly swift resolution, we can
Speaker 1: now try to draw lessons about the role of internet
Speaker 1: media in it all. But first, three things you need
Speaker 1: to know Today Bitcoin rose to a record past seventy
Speaker 1: five thousand as Trump wins presidency again. Next console will
Speaker 1: play current switch games Apple to face the first ever
Speaker 1: find under the EU's new digital antitrust rules. And here
Speaker 1: we go the subheadline, the torch in my ear. Donald
Speaker 1: Trump is about to become president again, capping an extraordinary
Speaker 1: comeback in a campaign where he was convicted of felonies
Speaker 1: and survived two assassination attempts. Now pause from the article.
Speaker 1: I object to the two assassination attempts. The one guy
Speaker 1: hiding in the bush near the golf course didn't get
Speaker 1: to take a shot at him. The one guy did
Speaker 1: take a shot at him allegedly, But anyway, I think
Speaker 1: it's one assassination attempt and one stalking attempt that almost
Speaker 1: went for an assassination. But anyway, WI split hairs back
Speaker 1: to the article. He's given his victory speech. World leaders
Speaker 1: from Germany to Israel have issued their congratulations and Elon
Speaker 1: Musk is posting memes aout bringing sinks to the Oval office.
Speaker 1: So how much credit to influencers like Joe Rogan deserve? Rogan,
Speaker 1: the world's biggest podcaster, endorsed Trump just before election day
Speaker 1: and helped get the Republican candidate's message out to a large,
Speaker 1: mostly male audience with a succession of lengthy interviews. Trump
Speaker 1: Is running mate j D. Vance and star surrogate Musk
Speaker 1: all had sit downs with the podcaster. Democratic candidate Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris did her own series of similar interviews in what's
Speaker 1: already been dubbed the Podcast Election. Both campaigns recognized something
Speaker 1: research data has consistently shown and which my own media
Speaker 1: consumption habits affirm. People are more hooked on podcasts than
Speaker 1: ever before, and they tend to trust the hosts of
Speaker 1: those shows. Wire podcasts, which have been kicking around the
Speaker 1: Internet for decades, so important today. There are many reasons,
Speaker 1: but I'll limit myself to my own experience. Firstly, it's
Speaker 1: a loneliness antidote my podcast listening balloon. During the pandemic,
Speaker 1: when we all had to get creative to cope with
Speaker 1: the era of social distancing, the genre of seemingly unvarnished conversation,
Speaker 1: as practiced by Rogan and innumerable sports shows, proved a
Speaker 1: passable replacement for in person get togethers, and unlike a
Speaker 1: real friend who I might only speak to occasionally, Rogan
Speaker 1: and his guests can keep me company for hours. They
Speaker 1: can be right there in my ear while I buy groceries,
Speaker 1: wash dishes, cycle to work, shoot hoops, or edit photos.
Speaker 1: The intimacy and immediacy of that connection can't be overstated. Inevitably,
Speaker 1: listeners develop a relationship with that voice. I recently lost
Speaker 1: internet in The Athletic Football Show. Oh. I recently lost
Speaker 1: interest in The Athletic Football Show after the departure of
Speaker 1: co host Nate Tice, and ultimately subscribe to his new podcast.
Speaker 1: All of that sets up a situation where you not
Speaker 1: only listen to, but also heed what your favorite podcaster
Speaker 1: is saying. Hence the common practice of having the host
Speaker 1: also read the ads. It's the same reason brands spend
Speaker 1: big on celebrity endorsements. Okay, pause, here's the thing. Talk
Speaker 1: radio used to function this way for people. Now you
Speaker 1: have talk radio on demand with podcasting, Joe Rogan is
Speaker 1: not part of the same universe as many other podcasters,
Speaker 1: and I know that I even personally keep some people company.
Speaker 1: I mean, you're a little more quirky if you're listening
Speaker 1: to the Ocelli effect as opposed to the Rogan experience, right,
Speaker 1: I think that's what that's called the Joe Rogan You
Speaker 1: know what. I refuse to listen to him. I've only
Speaker 1: ever listened to clips of Joe Rogan because I'm always
Speaker 1: anti the popular thing, and any clip I have listened
Speaker 1: to him with I'm not impressed. He gets great guests,
Speaker 1: but I'm not impressed with what he does with them.
Speaker 1: And there's a ton of guys out there that are
Speaker 1: like this, that are well supported, that were launched you
Speaker 1: know exactly right, that had great media strategies all the
Speaker 1: way around. Rogan is one of them, and he has
Speaker 1: continuously been at the top of what is it Spotify,
Speaker 1: I think it's Spotify anyway, He's been at the top
Speaker 1: of one of the leading podcast feeders out there, you know,
Speaker 1: the Potomatics of the Internet, and many others he's been
Speaker 1: at the top of. But others, you know, other podcasts
Speaker 1: have taken those top slots on occasion. Rogan maintains a
Speaker 1: huge audience according to the numbers that are given, and
Speaker 1: it is because he was properly launched, properly supported, and
Speaker 1: has serious sponsorship that make sure that his message is
Speaker 1: out there. Plus, if you have a staff of people
Speaker 1: to make sure certain things are run right, and all
Speaker 1: you gotta do is flip open a microphone and seem
Speaker 1: to have unscripted conversations, well that's not so bad. And
Speaker 1: if I had good PR I don't think I'd be
Speaker 1: as big as Rogan, But why not. There's plenty of
Speaker 1: room out there for podcasters' success and broadcaster online broadcast success.
Speaker 1: I still think that's a thing. But then again, in
Speaker 1: the on demand you know, in reality on demand reality
Speaker 1: of media, where you know you can listen to at anytime,
Speaker 1: call up the whole thing. Binge, listen, binge, watch whatever
Speaker 1: you want. That universe makes for a you know, a
Speaker 1: time and a place where there's no need for live
Speaker 1: broadcast anymore. I like it because I can do stuff
Speaker 1: like take calls, which of course you guys are not
Speaker 1: taking advantage of it at the moment. But I like
Speaker 1: being able to take calls and interact with a chat
Speaker 1: room live and et cetera, et cetera. And to some
Speaker 1: degree people still like that, but they love the podcast. Man,
Speaker 1: The podcast is great. And of course if you don't
Speaker 1: have a lot of friends, or you don't have a
Speaker 1: lot of people around you, yeah, it does keep you
Speaker 1: company and tell you the truth. Again, long before I
Speaker 1: had an iPod or a podcast to listen to, I
Speaker 1: was certainly just listening to talk radio, and I used
Speaker 1: to do crazy things like, you know, run a cassette
Speaker 1: tape and record an hour. When I had to go out,
Speaker 1: I would just record it on the home stereo and
Speaker 1: I could catch the whole next hour that I wasn't
Speaker 1: home to listen to. Some people listened in their cars, etc. Etc.
Speaker 1: But anyway, I think it's interesting that they're trying to
Speaker 1: credit podcasts with doing it, which, by the way, podcast
Speaker 1: is becoming a weird thing anyway, because every TV show
Speaker 1: now has a podcast that accompanies it. Every TV personality
Speaker 1: of any type has an additional podcast in addition to
Speaker 1: their regular show that they get their paycheck from, etc.
Speaker 1: But is that part of what drove it the podcast reality?
Speaker 1: And is Trump just you know, a better guest is
Speaker 1: jd Vance? Jd Vance is not, which, by the way,
Speaker 1: that's the most frightening part of anything having to do
Speaker 1: with Trump and his presidency is that that guy is
Speaker 1: now in the Mike Pen's position from last time. And
Speaker 1: I got to tell you, I think I'd feel better
Speaker 1: about Mike Pence coming in if something happened to Trump
Speaker 1: and jd Vance had to take over. Anyway, all of
Speaker 1: the strange theories about Trump not being able to make
Speaker 1: it and people were going to do this and that
Speaker 1: to him before he got in there, and they were
Speaker 1: going to steal the election from him, Notice, none of
Speaker 1: it happened anyway. How about opinions about how Harris lost.
Speaker 1: Let's go to the most simplified writing thing out there,
Speaker 1: you know, the most simplified written thing out there, I
Speaker 1: should say, as far as you know alleged electronic newspapers.
Speaker 1: Go and we'll go to an opinion piece in the
Speaker 1: USA today. I like this published let's see at six
Speaker 1: am today, looks like wow, early morning opinion. Harris lost
Speaker 1: because she was a bad candidate. Don't blame white women
Speaker 1: for that. There's another thing that's funny out there, pulling
Speaker 1: away from the article right away is the racial divide, right,
Speaker 1: the racial divide. This is what caused her not to
Speaker 1: be elected racism. No, because her not be elected is
Speaker 1: because she's a terrible candidate and people actually legitimately wanted
Speaker 1: to support Trump. That's the problem. You know, doesn't have
Speaker 1: to do with the disastrous afghanistraw stand withdraw. I don't
Speaker 1: think they're blaming Kamala for that, although you know they
Speaker 1: can attach everything to her if they want to. You know,
Speaker 1: is it about the bad economy? Did Kamala make any
Speaker 1: of those decisions?
Speaker 6: No?
Speaker 1: But she was part of the Biden administration. Okay, you
Speaker 1: know what will Trump do with the entirety of the government,
Speaker 1: including his version of the GOP under his control and
Speaker 1: that controlling all of the government. Well, I got to
Speaker 1: tell you a lot of people figure it'll be a
Speaker 1: better job than what we've been dealing with for the
Speaker 1: past four years, you know. And you can't compare the
Speaker 1: last time when he had the two years with you know,
Speaker 1: the Republican House and Senate. It just doesn't work. It's
Speaker 1: not the same circumstance. There's no anti Trumper's there, you know.
Speaker 1: And he is calling it the greatest political movement and
Speaker 1: blah blah blah. Well, it is the greatest political comeback
Speaker 1: in some time, and I would tell you that it's not.
Speaker 1: You know, Grover Cleveland is the interesting person to point
Speaker 1: to regarding Trump because first non consecutive presidential you know
Speaker 1: terms was Grover Cleveland, where they were disconnected. Trump now
Speaker 1: has accomplished that. He's only a second person in history
Speaker 1: do that. But it's a remarkable second comeback that you'd
Speaker 1: have to look to Richard Nixon really for you know,
Speaker 1: he's vice president. He was almost thought to be the
Speaker 1: certain candidate to come in and come in nineteen sixty.
Speaker 1: Kennedy beats him out in sixty two, I think it was,
Speaker 1: he runs for California governor and well he didn't make that.
Speaker 1: He lost pretty handily and went away for a little
Speaker 1: bit and then came back in sixty eight after a
Speaker 1: couple of people got killed and other things happened. And
Speaker 1: what did he do? He swept right on in. Johnson
Speaker 1: didn't run again. I mean, it was an interesting confluence
Speaker 1: of circumstances that came together to assure that Nixon would
Speaker 1: have a shot. And he was in there, and even
Speaker 1: with Watergate running up on him, he was reelected. And
Speaker 1: with all of his promises of how he'd handle Vietnam properly,
Speaker 1: I mean, clearly he didn't. He had a disastrous withdrawal too.
Speaker 1: Oh wait a minute, No, he didn't make it long
Speaker 1: enough to get his withdrawal. He kept promising it, but
Speaker 1: he never made it there, did he. Nope. From sixty
Speaker 1: eight to whenever Ford comes in and takes over and
Speaker 1: becomes president despite not having been elected as president or
Speaker 1: vice president in the past, Ford comes in, he's the
Speaker 1: one with the disastrous withdrawal. But that's okay because he
Speaker 1: was a buffoon anyway. Right, Yeah, you can't make any
Speaker 1: comparisons here, but you can compare the comeback that Nixon
Speaker 1: had from nineteen sixty and sixty two really being a
Speaker 1: political pariah to then being president in sixty eight, Nixon
Speaker 1: pulled off the comeback in the same decade as Trump
Speaker 1: does in the twenty twenties. Here, attempts to be reselected
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty didn't make it. Nobody thought that that
Speaker 1: was a smart idea some years ago to run a
Speaker 1: guy who had already lost in a presidential race. Again.
Speaker 1: But three times in a row the Republicans run this guy,
Speaker 1: and two out of the three they seem to have
Speaker 1: been correct anyway, so you know. But again, he's only
Speaker 1: the second American president to be elected in nonconsecutive singular terms. Right,
Speaker 1: one does wonder And already I've heard people speculate as
Speaker 1: to whether there will be an attempt to remove that
Speaker 1: limitation on presidents and let Trump have a third term.
Speaker 1: But think about how old he'll be by then. I mean,
Speaker 1: if you don't think he's too old now, I mean
Speaker 1: everybody thought he was too old when it was both
Speaker 1: him and Biden running together. Funny thing when they got
Speaker 1: Biden out of the race, no longer was Trump too old.
Speaker 1: I don't know how that worked with people's mentality.
Speaker 2: But it worked.
Speaker 1: But four years from now, how is he not going
Speaker 1: to look old? Then? I mean, I don't know what
Speaker 1: level of plastic surgery or transhumanism you need to use
Speaker 1: to accomplish that. But anyway, look, I don't want to
Speaker 1: run up against the nine o'clock time, because hard stop
Speaker 1: right before nine o'clock that's going to happen. So you
Speaker 1: have a limited time to join me at three to
Speaker 1: one nine five seven five zero one six, and if not,
Speaker 1: I will talk to myself and you as I go forward.
Speaker 1: But I've only got a few more things to cover
Speaker 1: before we're all done. Let's go back to another explanation,
Speaker 1: or maybe how about the celebration. Evangelical leaders celebrate Trump's
Speaker 1: victory as a prophecy fulfilled. This is on the NBC
Speaker 1: News website, and again I'll put that link in the
Speaker 1: live chatroom at Ochelli dot com and include it in
Speaker 1: the show notes, which, by the way, UH one does
Speaker 1: not have to wonder but knows what the policies will
Speaker 1: be regarding Ukraine, regarding Israel, regarding any of the conflicts
Speaker 1: that are either on their way to coming to fruition
Speaker 1: or already in progress. I don't know if everybody's going
Speaker 1: to be happy with the way that goes. I think
Speaker 1: Ukrainian support is over from the US. I think Israeli
Speaker 1: support is about to get doubled or tripled down on
Speaker 1: Does that make you happy? I don't know. I'll hear
Speaker 1: from you guys about this. Oh, I didn't even talk
Speaker 1: about the reactions I've gotten from you guys so far.
Speaker 1: Let me get through the NBC article really quickly, or
Speaker 1: at least part of it, and get to some of
Speaker 1: the other interesting articles that I thought made sense to
Speaker 1: look at here tonight. Anyway, back to this and again
Speaker 1: the headline Evangelical leaders celebrate Trump's victory as a prophecy
Speaker 1: of fulfilled This was published Let's see on the sixth
Speaker 1: of November by Mike Hicksonbaugh. Anyway, after having repeatedly depicted
Speaker 1: the presidential election as a spiritual clash between good and evil,
Speaker 1: leading figures in the movement to remake America as an
Speaker 1: explicitly Christian nation celebrated President elect Donald Trump's victory as
Speaker 1: a fulfillment of God's divine will. Lance Wallinu, a celebrity
Speaker 1: evangelist who has spent decades calling on conservative Christians to
Speaker 1: occupy positions of power and influence over society, told followers
Speaker 1: on an election night livestream that Trump's victory had been
Speaker 1: prophesied years ago a key step in God's plan to
Speaker 1: usher in a new era of Christian domination around the world.
Speaker 1: There quote, there's a different dialogue about spirituality happening in
Speaker 1: America and quote, said Walaanu, who had worked to mobilize
Speaker 1: Trump voters in swing states, and with Donald Trump, that's
Speaker 1: in quotes, he continued, God has given quote permission to
Speaker 1: take it right to the White House. White evangelical support
Speaker 1: for Trump has not waivered since he pledged in early
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen while running for the GOP presidential nomination that
Speaker 1: if he were elected, quote, Christianity will have power. Quote
Speaker 1: if I'm there, You're going to have plenty of power.
Speaker 1: You don't need anybody else. Trump continued, quote, You're going
Speaker 1: to have somebody representing you very very well. Remember that.
Speaker 1: End quote. Trump renewed that vow in twenty twenty four campaign,
Speaker 1: telling Christians that he would be granted quote power at
Speaker 1: a level that you've never used before. End quote. He
Speaker 1: promised to crack down on the acceptance of transgender people
Speaker 1: in schools and in society, and his campaign said it
Speaker 1: would create a task force focused on investigating all forms
Speaker 1: of illegal discrimination, harassment, and persecution against Christians in America.
Speaker 1: While Trump married three times and was found liable for
Speaker 1: sexual abuse might not seem an obvious fit to lead
Speaker 1: a religious movement, Walinu and other evangelicals champion him as
Speaker 1: a flawed leader who had been anointed by God to
Speaker 1: save America from the demonic influence of Democrats. That belief
Speaker 1: took on New Ferber in July, after Trump survived the
Speaker 1: first of two assassination attempts. Anyway, so that's in there.
Speaker 1: I'll give you a headline for another one. This is
Speaker 1: from world crunch dot com. And also gonna drop the
Speaker 1: uh the link in the chat room once again. And uh,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm being asked in the chat room which
Speaker 1: prophecy did he fulfill? I don't know, Fase Shifter, I
Speaker 1: do not know which prophecy he fulfilled. Just that he's
Speaker 1: prophesied to be the great Leader emerging. I guess I
Speaker 1: don't know. That's the weird thing. He's just part of
Speaker 1: the great prophecies coming true, the rise and return of
Speaker 1: the Savior. I guess I'm guessing here. I honestly do
Speaker 1: not know exactly which prophecy he is fulfilling three one nine, five,
Speaker 1: two seven, five zero one six By the bye is
Speaker 1: the number to call. And you've got about thirteen or
Speaker 1: maybe twelve minutes left to join me on the phone
Speaker 1: if you want, because I'm going to be done at
Speaker 1: nine o'clock. But until then, let's continue with some of
Speaker 1: the other articles that caught my eye. Uh and I
Speaker 1: like this one. The World Crunch article Trump and Musk
Speaker 1: techno oligarchy is coming exclamation point a dire warning from
Speaker 1: Brazil really quickly. In part, this article reads, with Donald
Speaker 1: Trump now heading back to the White House, Elon Musk's
Speaker 1: massive influence on the US becomes undeniable. From pouring hundreds
Speaker 1: of millions into Trump's campaign to bending social media narratives,
Speaker 1: Musk's actions underscore the ease which was with which the
Speaker 1: techno oligarchy can buy political sway, writes Natal Natalia Vienna
Speaker 1: of Brazil's leading investigative platform Agencia publica Anyway headline sell Pollo.
Speaker 1: Now that Donald Trump has won the presidential election in
Speaker 1: the United States, he is clearly indebted to Elon Musk.
Speaker 1: Last month, the world's richest man embraced the Republicans campaign
Speaker 1: as enthusiastically that he ended up securing a final push.
Speaker 1: Oh so enthusiastically, excuse me that he and yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: and giving the world a huge lesson in how US
Speaker 1: corruption works. It is a scandal. Having obtained a promise
Speaker 1: of top position in the future, government must pledge to
Speaker 1: donate at least five hundred million to the campaign. According
Speaker 1: to Trump himself, he did more. He organized dinners to
Speaker 1: convince other millionaires to donate like him, in large numbers,
Speaker 1: guaranteeing that it would be a safe investment. He created
Speaker 1: a super pack, an organization to raise funds and carry
Speaker 1: out actions to support an electoral campaign called America Pack,
Speaker 1: whose budget of one hundred and eighty million dollars. In
Speaker 1: addition to paying twenty five hundred people to go door
Speaker 1: to door convincing voters, hired lawyers to fight legal battles
Speaker 1: that could favor Trump. On x praised Trump used his
Speaker 1: huge reach to promote far right CONSPRS theories and criticized
Speaker 1: Democratic candidate Kamala Harris. He even took over a dormant
Speaker 1: at us at America profile to campaign. Okay, a dormant
Speaker 1: at America profile to campaign. He used his account with
Speaker 1: two hundred million followers to interview Trump on August twelve.
Speaker 1: During the interview, which was painful to watch, they both
Speaker 1: laughed about firing workers who go on strike. Tesla is
Speaker 1: the only major car manufacturer that doesn't allow its workers
Speaker 1: to set up a union. As we know here in Brazil,
Speaker 1: Musk's tweets are disproportionately driven by the algorithm of the
Speaker 1: corporation he acquired and which has since lost seventy percent
Speaker 1: of its value. Today, the social media platform formerly known
Speaker 1: as Twitter is little more than a propaganda machine for
Speaker 1: Elon Boy in his quest for power, so much so that,
Speaker 1: while posing as a defender of absolute freedom, X suspended
Speaker 1: the account of a reporter who had obtained confidential information
Speaker 1: about the Republican campaign and even banned links to the
Speaker 1: original post on substack. In addition, Musk has promised to
Speaker 1: distribute one million dollars a day to voters in key
Speaker 1: states who sign a petition defending the Constitution, a disguised
Speaker 1: way of making a lottery for those who vote for Trump.
Speaker 1: The measure is illegal in any country in the world,
Speaker 1: but in the US has only received a warning in
Speaker 1: quotes from the US Justice Department that it would potentially
Speaker 1: be illegal. In an interview with pseudo journalist Tucker Carlson,
Speaker 1: Musk asked, how long do you think my prison sentence
Speaker 1: will be if Trump loses? Elon has mainly been worried
Speaker 1: about saving his own ass. That is what is written
Speaker 1: in this article. It continues on, and that is on
Speaker 1: world crunch dot com. You get the idea, you get
Speaker 1: the picture. I've got about eight and a half minutes
Speaker 1: left of the show, so taking one more look at
Speaker 1: my phone lines, doesn't look like anybody's joining me. So
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna give you the number again. But let's
Speaker 1: get to a particular thing that bothers me a little.
Speaker 1: And I'm wondering how they're gonna take it, because it
Speaker 1: seems as though many libertarians, right wingers, various people of
Speaker 1: various stripes really fell into the Trump camp. And I
Speaker 1: got to say, most people that I thought were very
Speaker 1: libertarian leaning all ended up on the Trump side this
Speaker 1: year too. I find that remarkable, but not all that's surprising. However,
Speaker 1: some of us care about some deep political issues, like
Speaker 1: how about we learn the truth about the jfk assassination.
Speaker 1: Anybody who's listened to my show for more than one
Speaker 1: shot knows. This is a big issue for me. I've
Speaker 1: done more shows on that topic than any other, and
Speaker 1: I bring it up anytime it's in the news, for sure.
Speaker 1: But it's interesting to me that with RFK Junior joining
Speaker 1: the Trump universe directly and becoming exactly what I said
Speaker 1: he was, which is a tool for Trump, which was
Speaker 1: somebody who was effectively as somebody was going to serve
Speaker 1: the purposes of getting Trump elected. Take a look at
Speaker 1: how you were able to fold rfk's support into the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign, with the exception of the fact that even
Speaker 1: though he had suspended his presidential campaign, people still voted
Speaker 1: for him anyway in places where he was on the
Speaker 1: ballot and stuck there right, But otherwise support for RFK
Speaker 1: Junior was folded into Trump. Wouldn't it be fascinating if
Speaker 1: somebody found out that that was the big difference and
Speaker 1: actually gave him that margin of win. But anyway, I
Speaker 1: don't think so. By the way, that's not my theory
Speaker 1: at all, but it would be fascinating if that's what happened,
Speaker 1: because at one point RFK Junior looked to be a
Speaker 1: very viable candidate but decided to go along with Trump
Speaker 1: and is going to be part of it anyway. People
Speaker 1: want to talk about him being the new you know
Speaker 1: health guy. Uh, he's going to be in charge, and
Speaker 1: he's going to dismantle the FDA, and he's going to
Speaker 1: take vaccine manufacturers to task, and he's going to clean
Speaker 1: up the food and all these things he's going to
Speaker 1: do for everybody's health and welfare and take over the
Speaker 1: agency or eliminate it, not sure which Health and Human services.
Speaker 1: He's going to take all the agencies under that umbrella
Speaker 1: and either change them or eliminate them as part of
Speaker 1: the Trump administration. That's what everybody's telling me. But what's
Speaker 1: fascinating is right wingers and libertarians alike have told me
Speaker 1: that now I should be very happy as some warped
Speaker 1: form of libertarian that RFK Junior is going to be
Speaker 1: part of. This is part of the Trump train reality. Well,
Speaker 1: here's a worry that I have only seen and people
Speaker 1: have connected, you know, the whole RFK thing to this
Speaker 1: issue as well, you know, because I complained the Trump
Speaker 1: administration and the Biden administration both failed to do anything
Speaker 1: except what the intelligence community told them to do or
Speaker 1: asked them to do regarding the JFK files. They continued
Speaker 1: to withhold them because the intelligence community asked them to.
Speaker 1: Then they continued to withhold them just because they felt
Speaker 1: like it and the intelligence agency asked them to. Now
Speaker 1: the Very Pharaoh Foundation is still suing the Biden administration
Speaker 1: as we speak, and may have to take that lawsuit
Speaker 1: to the Trump administration next unless the big prediction from
Speaker 1: people is that once again, and they told me this
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen, once again, Trump will make sure all
Speaker 1: the JFK files are released. Now he had a twenty
Speaker 1: seventeen date coming up where all he had to do
Speaker 1: was nothing in order to allow the JFK Records Collection
Speaker 1: Act stuff to come out. There was a bunch of
Speaker 1: things ear marked for twenty five years after they were
Speaker 1: examined and accepted to be released by the government under
Speaker 1: that executive brand agency. But those things that were sitting
Speaker 1: there for twenty five years waiting to be released, Trump
Speaker 1: stopped it, kicked it down the road to the Biden administration.
Speaker 1: The Biden administration tried to put a no time limit whatsoever,
Speaker 1: kicked the can issue on it so that we'll never
Speaker 1: see this stuff. So Trump did not actually succeed even
Speaker 1: when he had a good chance in twenty seventeen to
Speaker 1: sit back and do nothing and take credit for actually
Speaker 1: releasing a whole bunch of JFK files. But the only
Speaker 1: place I've seen this worry is a libertarian whipsite website
Speaker 1: and organization called the Future of Freedom Foundation. Jacob Warnberger
Speaker 1: wrote this article, which I'm going to read partially from.
Speaker 1: But I'm wondering what people think about whether just because
Speaker 1: he's got RFK Junior on his team, if that's going
Speaker 1: to matter regarding the JFK files. I don't think so.
Speaker 1: I don't believe so. I think a new excuse will
Speaker 1: be made and you'll get a partial release again and
Speaker 1: a whole bunch of stuff still stuffed away, and they'll say, look,
Speaker 1: we released everything, even though they didn't. And they'll continue
Speaker 1: not to release stuff and not to expand upon it,
Speaker 1: and not to follow the law as it stands, and
Speaker 1: not to enforce anything. Well, there's no enforcement mechanism in place,
Speaker 1: but anyway, they're not going to adhere to the JFK
Speaker 1: Records Collection Act. They're not going to act in the
Speaker 1: spirit of the law. They're not even going to finish
Speaker 1: the unfinished business from the nineties, that was only supposed
Speaker 1: to wait twenty five years, that was coming up in
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen and came and went, I think they're going
Speaker 1: to do the bare minimum and then pretend that they
Speaker 1: took care of all of it. That's my prediction. It's
Speaker 1: a fairly good one considering that's what Trump did the
Speaker 1: first time, and that's what Biden did the second time.
Speaker 1: But let's see what Trump do it again. Like I said,
Speaker 1: the Future Freedom Foundation offers a slightly different look at this.
Speaker 1: What it is. Reminder our online Zoom conference. Okay, I'm
Speaker 1: skipping that part. I'll be speaking. Oh and he's also
Speaker 1: reminding us that he's speaking at the JFK Lancer Conference.
Speaker 1: Because this is written by Jacob Wornberger. A fascinating situation
Speaker 1: has now developed between President elect Donald Trump and the
Speaker 1: US national security establishment with respect to the long secret
Speaker 1: JFK assassination related records that the CIA has succeeded in
Speaker 1: keeping secret for more than sixty years. And by the way,
Speaker 1: I'm going to put this link in the chat room
Speaker 1: at o'chelly dot com and you can follow along on
Speaker 1: the article which I'm reading part of here. Anyway, the
Speaker 1: CIA has succeeded in keeping secret for more than sixty
Speaker 1: years sorright. Despite Trump's campaign vow to release those records,
Speaker 1: it's not at all clear how this matter is going
Speaker 1: to be resolved. I will give my prediction at the
Speaker 1: end of this article. There are three major factors at play. One,
Speaker 1: during his twenty two twenty four campaign, Trump vowed that
Speaker 1: this time around he is definitely going to order the
Speaker 1: National Archives to release those sixty year old SECRETCYIA records. Moreover,
Speaker 1: as he told Joe Rogan, he's going to do it
Speaker 1: quote immediately end quote. See Trump to Rogan, if elected,
Speaker 1: I'm opening remaining JFK files immediately. By Jefferson Morley. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's a note there, and there's a link. But anyway,
Speaker 1: back to the article in just a second. First, I
Speaker 1: want to say it's interesting that he's going to command
Speaker 1: the National Archives to release stuff. And remember all those
Speaker 1: arguments about the president can declassify whatever he wants whenever
Speaker 1: he wants. Remember those arguments, my friends, because I could
Speaker 1: have swore that that was one of Trump's arguments about
Speaker 1: how he could share whatever, release to the public whatever.
Speaker 1: Doesn't that mean he could do that with this stuff
Speaker 1: out never mind, I'm just imagining stuff. Let's place the
Speaker 1: first factor in a historical context. Records Collection Act, which
Speaker 1: was enacted in nineteen ninety two, ordered the National Security
Speaker 1: Establishment and all other federal agencies to disclose their JFK
Speaker 1: assassination related records to the public. However, the law gave
Speaker 1: federal officials an out if they claimed that the release
Speaker 1: of certain records might jeopardize quote national security end quote
Speaker 1: in various ways, they could keep them secret for another
Speaker 1: twenty five years, Yes, twenty five additional years of secrecy
Speaker 1: on top of the secrecy from nineteen sixty three to
Speaker 1: the nineteen nineties. Taking advantage of that out, the National
Speaker 1: Security Establishment, especially the CIA, continued keeping thousands of its
Speaker 1: assassination related records secret. The twenty five year period ran
Speaker 1: out during Trump's first term as president. At first, Trump
Speaker 1: claim declared valiantly that he was going to comply with
Speaker 1: the law and permit the National Archives to release and
Speaker 1: disclose the records. But then, just before the deadline arrived,
Speaker 1: Trump was visited by the CIA, who insisted on continued
Speaker 1: secrecy of its fascination related records. Now, look, this article
Speaker 1: goes on and on, but guess what I'm out of time, Folks,
Speaker 1: I want you to consider it. Take a look at
Speaker 1: the links, the articles that I've included with the show
Speaker 1: notes and all that good stuff, because I'm done for
Speaker 1: this particular Thor's Day O'Kelly effect, and I had open
Speaker 1: phone lines but got no callers. Guess I'll just have
Speaker 1: to figure that that means you guys had no idea
Speaker 1: that I was gonna go live. I tried to tell
Speaker 1: people on Twitter, but hey, it is what it is.
Speaker 1: So I'll be back live tomorrow night with my co
Speaker 1: host b Pete, and we'll do the open mic for
Speaker 1: Friday night on the O'Kelly effect, and I guarantee there'll
Speaker 1: be more to say then. Plus I'm opening to here
Speaker 1: from Jimmy James and let him take a little victory
Speaker 1: lap on my show, because after all, already