Speaker 1: Billy Cunningham, the great American. Happy Saint Patty's Day, Monday
Speaker 1: afternoon with a Trice' day. Well, don't hippy weather, but
Speaker 1: over the weekend was awful. Ran back out of Wednesday
Speaker 1: or Thursday. Reds. I think they win a game now
Speaker 1: and then in spring training. I'm told by Moe and
Speaker 1: others that over the last twenty five years the Reds
Speaker 1: have had the worst record in spring training of any
Speaker 1: team in baseball. Of course, it doesn't matter, but it
Speaker 1: does set the tone for winning. Will DZ go to
Speaker 1: the monitors. We'll find out later. But the big news,
Speaker 1: of course is t number one and number five are
Speaker 1: both in the full Jamar etc. Even though it's Saint
Speaker 1: Patty's Day, mo the pipes, the pipes are calling from
Speaker 1: Glen to Glenn and down the mountain side. Summer's gone
Speaker 1: and all the roses falling. It's you and you must go,
Speaker 1: and I must bide Moager. First of all, a brokeclass.
Speaker 1: Not about eleven PM when I was on the air,
Speaker 1: Ora rating. Tell me your thoughts on the deal. Tell
Speaker 1: the American people to deal with Jamar and with Tea.
Speaker 1: Give us a full report. Well, it's good to be
Speaker 1: with you on the same day, Willie.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think last night was the end of a
Speaker 2: long journey that has resulted in the Bengals carving out
Speaker 2: their identity for the foreseeable future.
Speaker 1: Now, this may work, it may not work.
Speaker 2: I think the onus is being put on Duke Tobin
Speaker 2: to draft well and draft well for this year, to
Speaker 2: get players in the draft, especially given their relative inactivity
Speaker 2: and free agency, draft players who can help the Bengals
Speaker 2: this year. But you know how many times have you
Speaker 2: heard people wonder about a team and at times the Bengals, God,
Speaker 2: what's their identity? What are they supposed to hang their
Speaker 2: hat on? Well, there's no doubt about that. Now, there's
Speaker 2: no question about that. Right now, the identity of the
Speaker 2: Cincinnati Bengals is going to be Joe Burrow, Jamar Chase
Speaker 2: and T Higgins and a team that possesses the ability
Speaker 2: to beat teams with the pass. They've got a quarterback
Speaker 2: who has I think a claim to the title of
Speaker 2: best in the NFL.
Speaker 1: He has two all World receivers.
Speaker 2: Whatever the Bengals do moving forward, good bad, whether they
Speaker 2: win a Super Bowl, whether they fall massively short of expectations,
Speaker 2: the identity of this team is going to be those
Speaker 2: three guys. To me, the big takeaway here, Willie is
Speaker 2: the Bengals chose to not go to war with Joe Burrow.
Speaker 1: This is, I think a pretty remarkable pivot.
Speaker 2: If you understand anything about this franchise, and I know
Speaker 2: you do, they typically don't pivot from one direction to
Speaker 2: the other because of public sentiment or because a player
Speaker 2: wants them to. If if they're gonna do A, they're
Speaker 2: not going to be compelled to do B. You're not
Speaker 2: going to back him into a corner. You're not gonna
Speaker 2: out negotiate them. And yet it would appear here that
Speaker 2: when Joe Burrow back on December the ninth said well
Speaker 2: there's a plan.
Speaker 1: I've got a plan.
Speaker 2: We've got a plan, that that triggered a pivot in
Speaker 2: a direction completely opposite of what direction they.
Speaker 1: Were going in all along.
Speaker 2: For months on end, we talked about t Higgins not
Speaker 2: playing for the Bengals in twenty twenty five, playing in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty four under the franchise tag, hitting free agency,
Speaker 2: and the Bengals having to replace them. That change started
Speaker 2: when Joe Burrow started talking about T Higgins being in
Speaker 2: need and it continued, if you believe the reports out
Speaker 2: there when t Higgins changed agents and hired the same
Speaker 2: agent that Jamar Chase has, and that agent made it
Speaker 2: known to the Bengals, if you want one, you gotta
Speaker 2: have both. The Bengals got out foxed. The Bengals got
Speaker 2: pushed around, and I give them credit for because this
Speaker 2: is a team that is they'll go to war with you.
Speaker 2: Now you know this, they'll go to war with you.
Speaker 2: They've gone to war with some of their players in
Speaker 2: the past. They chose to not go to war with
Speaker 2: Joe Burrow. They gave the Bengals quarterback what he wants.
Speaker 2: They keep their identity intact, and now the onus is
Speaker 2: on Duke Tobin to have a draft that fixes the defense,
Speaker 2: that makes the offensive line better and allows the Bengals
Speaker 2: to take advantage of what is their core identity, which
Speaker 2: is the trio of Joe, Jamar and t.
Speaker 1: Well, let's break it down. Jamar and t have signed
Speaker 1: jamarkets four years, one sixty one, one twelve is guaranteed,
Speaker 1: making him the highest paid nine non QB in the
Speaker 1: NFL history until the next deal, and t gets four years,
Speaker 1: one fifteen. The first two years guaranteed, making him the
Speaker 1: highest paid number two wide receiver and NFL history until
Speaker 1: the next contract, it'll be broken. So when you talk
Speaker 1: about Jamar Chase four years, one sixty one, he's twenty
Speaker 1: five years old, one twelve guaranteed. Does that mean mo
Speaker 1: that after two years or three years, the Bengals are
Speaker 1: on the hook only for one twelve and not one
Speaker 1: sixty one if they for some reason, something happens that
Speaker 1: the Bengals. Of course, when you're twenty five years old,
Speaker 1: you think you got the next four years anyway to
Speaker 1: your twenty nine. And Jamar Chase, with all due respect
Speaker 1: to the other three or four great great wide receivers,
Speaker 1: is the best wide receiver in Bengals history. They hit
Speaker 1: on him, but off the one sixty one are the
Speaker 1: Bengals only in the hook for one twelve? Is that
Speaker 1: how that works? Yeah?
Speaker 2: Essentially they're on the hook for three years worth of
Speaker 2: money out of the four year deal. Obviously, everybody hopes
Speaker 2: that Jamar collects every penny because that means he's healthy,
Speaker 2: means the team hasn't moved on from him. Would I
Speaker 2: would find it hard to believe that, knowing what we
Speaker 2: know about Jamar Chase if he stays healthy, that he
Speaker 2: doesn't collect every penny that's on that contract. But I
Speaker 2: think this signifies not just the shift in the Bengals,
Speaker 2: the shift in the NFL. Number One, you're seeing where
Speaker 2: the money is going toward wide receivers. Number two, you're
Speaker 2: seeing elite players and quarterbacks get guaranteed money.
Speaker 1: It wasn't that long ago.
Speaker 2: You don't have to go back that far to find
Speaker 2: the time where NFL players were complaining relative to their
Speaker 2: peers in the NBA, relative to their peers in Major
Speaker 2: League Baseball. Those guys are getting a lot of guaranteed money.
Speaker 2: NFL players aren't. Now, most NFL players will still not
Speaker 2: get a lot of guaranteed money, but that's changing with
Speaker 2: elite players. Jamar Chase is an elite player. T Higgins,
Speaker 2: if you would have hit free agency, probably would have
Speaker 2: been the most sought after free agent in the entire market.
Speaker 2: And so the only way you were getting deals done
Speaker 2: with those guys.
Speaker 1: Were to guarantee the money.
Speaker 2: And the only way you're guaranteeing the money is if
Speaker 2: you can cover it with cash, which to me kind
Speaker 2: of flies in the face of the suggestion that many
Speaker 2: have made that the Bengals have a cash problem. If
Speaker 2: you're going to guarantee money in the NFL, you've got
Speaker 2: to be able to cover it. You've got to be
Speaker 2: able to have the cash on hand to cover the guarantee.
Speaker 2: That's one of the reasons why the Bengals were motivated
Speaker 2: to sell the naming rights to their stadium. Many over
Speaker 2: the last couple of months have suggested that one of
Speaker 2: the reasons why the Bengals aren't doing this and they're
Speaker 2: having a hard time working out the guarantee structure with
Speaker 2: Jamar Chase and maybe having a hard time working out
Speaker 2: the guarantee structure with T. Higgins, is that they have
Speaker 2: a cash problem and they can't cover the guarantee with cash. Well,
Speaker 2: either that's changed or that wasn't true to begin with,
Speaker 2: because now the Bengals are covering a lot of guaranteed
Speaker 2: money with these three players, and upwards of if you
Speaker 2: add it all together, five hundred million dollars in guaranteed cash.
Speaker 1: Listening to some of your compatriots on ESPN and Fox
Speaker 1: Radio the last couple of weeks, they were saying the
Speaker 1: Bengals had no identity. They were gonna let T Higgins
Speaker 1: go they've angered Jamar Chase and Carson Palmer led the
Speaker 1: way for Joe Burrow, which is the two nines that
Speaker 1: we've had. Carson Palmer couldn't take it anymore, and they're
Speaker 1: left now that the deal was done. I listened and
Speaker 1: watched this morning, and guess what they're given the Bengals
Speaker 1: a lot of pats on the back saying get it done.
Speaker 1: That they solidified Duke Tobin's position as someone who speaks
Speaker 1: with authority. He said about ten days ago, this will
Speaker 1: get done. Now it got done. Now it is done.
Speaker 1: But now the onus is on, shall we say, the draft,
Speaker 1: the draft assistant coaches. I don't know who the general
Speaker 1: manager is. Maybe it's Katie. And if it's Katie, she's
Speaker 1: doing a great job, by the way. And the experts
Speaker 1: are saying, well, the Bengals do such bad jobs in
Speaker 1: the draft, they could become like the Miami Dolphins with
Speaker 1: a great offense, no defense. They were nine to eight
Speaker 1: last year according to the experts, with the best wide receiver,
Speaker 1: maybe the best receiving corps, the best quarterback, and the
Speaker 1: best rusher on the defense, and they still went nine
Speaker 1: to eight. So what's different this year? Other than they're
Speaker 1: a year older and a year better. It's still an
Speaker 1: onus on Duke Tobin, et cetera in order to draft correctly,
Speaker 1: which has not been happening much recently. But at least
Speaker 1: there's a buzz in town this afternoon that didn't exist
Speaker 1: as of Friday afternoon. Would you agree there's a buzz.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there's a buzz, and I think moving forward, you
Speaker 2: know what the Bengals are going to build around right now,
Speaker 2: you can certainly argue, Hey, look, Jamar Chase was under
Speaker 2: contracts in twenty twenty five.
Speaker 1: T Higgins had no wiggle room.
Speaker 2: He was franchise tagged and so unless the Bengals traded him,
Speaker 2: he was going to have to play for the Bengals
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty five. But they're gonna be an interesting
Speaker 2: case study because you talked about the Dolphins and the Eagles.
Speaker 2: So the Bengals have one hundred and twenty four million
Speaker 2: dollars per year invested in their quarterback and their top
Speaker 2: two wide receivers. That's number one in the NFL. The
Speaker 2: Miami Dolphins are second, the Philadelphia Eagles are third, So.
Speaker 1: It's going to be interesting.
Speaker 2: You mentioned the Dolphins are the Bengals going to be
Speaker 2: more like the Miami Dolphins, a team that has high
Speaker 2: end wide receiver talent but falls woefully short of expectation.
Speaker 2: Or are they going to be like the Philadelphia Eagles,
Speaker 2: which has a lot of money not only tied up
Speaker 2: in their quarterback in top two wide receivers, but a
Speaker 2: lot of money tied up in their running back. What
Speaker 2: do the Eagles do well? They draft well, and they
Speaker 2: find players in free agency, especially on defense, but also
Speaker 2: on the offensive line who are really good bargain players
Speaker 2: who end up out producing what they're making. The onus
Speaker 2: now is on Duke Tobin. The Bengals in recent years
Speaker 2: haven't drafted well, especially on defense. Now, I think the
Speaker 2: jury is out as it relates to last year's draft class.
Speaker 2: I think there's a lot to like about last year's
Speaker 2: draft class, but it's a little bit too early to
Speaker 2: say whether or not they drafted well in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 2: But the reality is in recent years, the Bengals haven't
Speaker 2: done a very good job of drafting. Look, this is
Speaker 2: a league that's about two things. It's about high end talent,
Speaker 2: right and those guys getting paid the upper crust, And
Speaker 2: it's about cheap labor, and the middle class player matters.
Speaker 2: But you've got to nail it with your elite players.
Speaker 2: They have to play at an elite level. Joe Burrow
Speaker 2: has to play at an elite level, which he did
Speaker 2: last year. Jamar Chase has to play at an elite level,
Speaker 2: which he did last year. What has not gone well
Speaker 2: for the Bengals is they're not getting a lot out
Speaker 2: of their cheap labor. Their draft picks the guys who
Speaker 2: aren't making a lot of money. If that doesn't change,
Speaker 2: the results that Joe, Jamar and t achieve is going
Speaker 2: to be limited. If that does change, the Bengals can
Speaker 2: win a Super Bowl. This is going to be a
Speaker 2: draft where Duke Tobin has to find players, has to
Speaker 2: find players, especially on defense, who could help now. And
Speaker 2: I think one of the interesting things about the Bengals,
Speaker 2: if you go back to the last few years, I
Speaker 2: think they've made some reaches in the draft. Now it's
Speaker 2: pretty obvious what they're going to be targeting, right they
Speaker 2: need guys on defense. This isn't so much going to
Speaker 2: be about who the best player available is. It's going
Speaker 2: to be about is there a guy who fits what
Speaker 2: we need given what round they're in. I think that
Speaker 2: lends you to the possibility of maybe reaching a little
Speaker 2: bit more than you would like. The Bengals don't have
Speaker 2: a good track record when it comes to some of
Speaker 2: their recent reaches in the draft. If that changes, this
Speaker 2: team's got a shot. If it doesn't, it doesn't. We'll
Speaker 2: see in the coming weeks what the Bengals draft strategy is,
Speaker 2: whether it's successfully executed, and whether the guys they take
Speaker 2: in April can make an impact immediately come September.
Speaker 1: You know, Moeger I have a lot of good feelings
Speaker 1: about Trey Hendrickson, and what does this say about him?
Speaker 1: He took time to raise money for Deer Park High School?
Speaker 1: A great guy? Does this mean he's thirty years old?
Speaker 1: He's an edge rusher, maybe the best in all of football.
Speaker 1: You got Garrett making forty million dollars a year. Is
Speaker 1: this a death now to Trey Hendrickson staying here and
Speaker 1: the Bengals have Ford, an edge rusher like him, along
Speaker 1: with these three? Is this good or bad news for
Speaker 1: Trey Hendrickson. I don't think it's it's either.
Speaker 2: You know, Trey was a little bit different because Trey
Speaker 2: Hendrickson was given a chance to go see what else
Speaker 2: is out there. The Bengals gave him the freedom to
Speaker 2: go explore whether a team would give him what he
Speaker 2: is looking for, and then if the answer was yes,
Speaker 2: the Bengals were willing to work with that team on
Speaker 2: a trade. I've read reports that suggest that Trey has
Speaker 2: found teams willing to meet his asking price, but those
Speaker 2: teams are not willing to meet the Bengals asking price,
Speaker 2: and so maybe that that brings Trey Hendrickson back to
Speaker 2: the negotiating table in a slightly reduced position. Okay, I'm
Speaker 2: not going to be traded. If I want a long
Speaker 2: term deal, it's going to have to be here. And
Speaker 2: maybe they figure out a way to get it done,
Speaker 2: or maybe he simply plays out his contract year in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty five and he hits free agency this year.
Speaker 2: I think they would like to get it done. What
Speaker 2: I want to know is based on his search for
Speaker 2: a trade and the at least as of now, inability
Speaker 2: for a deal to get done. Does that change the
Speaker 2: Trey Hendrickson asking price and does that make him more
Speaker 2: likely to be signed? I think because of what they
Speaker 2: haven't done so far in free agency. Willie It's not
Speaker 2: like there's a Plan B behind Trey Hendrickson. A lot
Speaker 2: of the good edge rushers have left. The edge rushers
Speaker 2: on this team are thus far, at least have proven
Speaker 2: to be not very good, not reliable, and so if
Speaker 2: you let Trey Hendrickson get away, where's your pass rush
Speaker 2: gonna come from? I think he is almost a necessity
Speaker 2: for the twenty twenty five team.
Speaker 1: I think the question is do they.
Speaker 2: Find common ground on whether or not something gets done
Speaker 2: beyond twenty twenty five. I've read today that there's movement
Speaker 2: toward that we'll see if it happens. But Trey Hendrickson
Speaker 2: was given a chance to see if he can get
Speaker 2: a deal from another team elsewhere. Nothing has gotten done
Speaker 2: in the interim. A lot of edge rushers have signed.
Speaker 2: I find it hard to believe that Trey Hendrickson is
Speaker 2: not going to at least play for the Bengals this
Speaker 2: coming season.
Speaker 1: All right. Another big news in town, of course, is
Speaker 1: Xavier basketball is something you care little about because you're
Speaker 1: a UC kind of a guy, and I asked you
Speaker 1: off the air, is Xavier actually in the tournament or not?
Speaker 1: Because this is a playing game Wednesday night in Dayton.
Speaker 1: I think about nine to ten tip with Texas and
Speaker 1: you're told me they're in the tournament even though they're
Speaker 1: in a playing game. What does this say about Xavier basketball?
Speaker 1: And who do you like Wednesday night? Well, I like
Speaker 1: Xavier to beat Texas.
Speaker 2: Now, Texas has a guy who is probably a lottery
Speaker 2: pick in Trey Johnson, who averaged over twenty a game,
Speaker 2: shoots forty percent from behind the arc. He individually can
Speaker 2: be an absolute load. And look, you look at Texas's
Speaker 2: record and first year of the SEC. The SEC was
Speaker 2: historically good this year, and so you look at their
Speaker 2: six and twelve record and go, Okay, maybe that's more
Speaker 2: of a byproduct of just the quality of the league.
Speaker 2: But I like how Xavier played over the second half
Speaker 2: of the season. They're making threes. This is a team
Speaker 2: that beat Yukon, beat Marquette, nearly had him beaten on Wednesday,
Speaker 2: beat good NCAA tournament teams one seventh straight down the stretch.
Speaker 2: Zach Fremantle was terrific. And they've got a guy in
Speaker 2: Ryan Conwell and you saw this on Wednesday against Marquette
Speaker 2: who has the ability to just go get buckets for
Speaker 2: you and keep another team from going on a long run.
Speaker 2: Texas could be playing for its coaches job. Rodney Terry
Speaker 2: is the head coach. I've read reports that say the
Speaker 2: Longhorns need to win two NCAA tournament games for him
Speaker 2: to keep his gig. Does that mean that Texas comes
Speaker 2: out and plays desperate or does that mean that Texas
Speaker 2: comes out with most of their players with one foot
Speaker 2: in the transfer portal. I don't know, but I do
Speaker 2: like how the Musketeers played. I didn't like how they
Speaker 2: defended down the stretch against Marquette, but that came against
Speaker 2: Marquette swung with about thirteen minutes ago, when Sean Miller
Speaker 2: put Ryan Conwell and Zach Fremantle both on the bench.
Speaker 2: I think that's a strategy that he would obviously like
Speaker 2: to revisit. But yes, they are in NCAA. Turn them
Speaker 2: in team and look, all all you have to do
Speaker 2: is ask your buddy Mick Cronin, you can go from
Speaker 2: the first four to the final four. I'm certainly not
Speaker 2: here to tell you that Xavier is going to do that,
Speaker 2: but Mick Cronin had a team that not only was
Speaker 2: in the first four, but was losing in the first four.
Speaker 2: At halftime, ended up beating Michigan State, then beat BYU,
Speaker 2: beat Ablin, Christian beat Alabama, beat Michigan, and nearly beacon
Speaker 2: Zaga to play for a national championship. VCU in twenty
Speaker 2: eleven wins its game in the first four. They beat Georgetown,
Speaker 2: beat Purdue, beat Florida State, I think in overtime beat
Speaker 2: Kansas played in the final four. There have been other
Speaker 2: teams Tennessee in twenty fourteen, Lasal in twenty thirteen, Syracuse
Speaker 2: in twenty eighteen, teams that played in the first four
Speaker 2: in Dayton and got to the second weekend of the
Speaker 2: NCAA tournament. Xavier can do that. Now They're gonna have
Speaker 2: to play Illinois on Friday if they win, and then
Speaker 2: maybe down a road to match up against the University
Speaker 2: of Kentucky Wildcats, who have had a wildly successful first
Speaker 2: season with Mark Pope is the head coach. But yes,
Speaker 2: the Musketeers are in the tournament. They belong in the tournament.
Speaker 2: They're favored to win on Wednesday, and I think they will.
Speaker 1: Well, Mo, we'll save the Reds for another day. Well,
Speaker 1: Alexis ds be sent down to the Miners, who was
Speaker 1: an All Star recently. Now the closer it maybe is closed.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure about that, but singers doing great work.
Speaker 1: We'll save the Reds for another day a week from
Speaker 1: Thursday at all starts, and are you prepared a minute remaining?
Speaker 1: Are you prepared for the Reds to dominate the National
Speaker 1: League Central.
Speaker 2: I'm prepared to watch the Reds have a chance to
Speaker 2: win the National League Central if they can hit. I
Speaker 2: would feel better about their ability to hit if I
Speaker 2: knew that Tyler Stevenson and Spencer Steer we're going to.
Speaker 1: Be healthy Without those two. It could be an issue,
Speaker 1: is what you're saying. Yes, Moe, thank you very much.
Speaker 1: Give me your analysis it is. I can't. I have
Speaker 1: no idea how you remember all this stuff about Vcus run.
Speaker 1: I have no idea. But ILLINOI is also hurting. So
Speaker 1: if they get over Texas and then beat Illinois, good
Speaker 1: stuff's going to happen. Mowager, First of all, again, happy
Speaker 1: Saint Patty's dave me and you and yours continue to
Speaker 1: kiss the barney stone and have a great, great Monday afternoon. Though,
Speaker 1: thank you. You want me to kiss what the blarney stone?
Speaker 1: Are you going to kiss it? Upside down? Upside down.
Speaker 1: I kissed it upside down. MO, thank you very much.
Speaker 3: All right, will you see.
Speaker 1: You Let's continue with more You're analysis five one, three, seven, four, nine,
Speaker 1: seven thousand plus later on we have Congressman Warren Davidson,
Speaker 1: et cetera. There's a sense of good goodliness happening in
Speaker 1: the tri State because of these signings last night. Now,
Speaker 1: from a pr perspective, it might have been better to
Speaker 1: hold a big news conferences instead of it leaking out.
Speaker 1: But this is the Bengal way, and let's see what happens.
Speaker 1: Bill Cunningham, News Radio seven hundred WLW by Bully Cunningham,
Speaker 1: The Great America, and a couple of bookkeeping eyeings before
Speaker 1: we proceed any further. I got word that you're a
Speaker 1: good friend and mine. Sheriff Lease is back in the
Speaker 1: hospital in not good shape. So before they close of
Speaker 1: business today, if you can say a prayer for Simon
Speaker 1: Lease's recovery, that would be great. Size ninety three years
Speaker 1: old and he's lived a great life. He's one of
Speaker 1: the mentors that I've had. I enjoyed practicing law before
Speaker 1: him when it was on the bench, and as you
Speaker 1: may know, he endorsed and the current sheriff, Charmaine McGuffey.
Speaker 1: And one of the main reasons I've become a supporter
Speaker 1: of Charmaine mcguffrey is because of Simon Lees and his
Speaker 1: chief deputy Sean Donovan, both of whom support Charmaine McGuffey.
Speaker 1: And so but nonetheless, Si, you know, ninety three years
Speaker 1: old getting up there, shall we say, And he was
Speaker 1: taken to the hospital over the weekend not doing well,
Speaker 1: but the family's anticipating a good recovery, so say a
Speaker 1: prayer for him. And secondly, my conversation with Moe, I
Speaker 1: had a UC Faithful tell me that Xavier is not
Speaker 1: in the n CAA tournament because not in the field
Speaker 1: of sixty four. They're in the field of sixty eight
Speaker 1: and the play in is Wednesday at tip about nine
Speaker 1: oh five nine ten in Dayton where they beat Dayton
Speaker 1: up there about four or five months ago. But I contend,
Speaker 1: as as Avier Faithful, that they appear to be in
Speaker 1: the tournament, but some say they're not in the tournament.
Speaker 1: Put that in your pipe and smoke and I'm not
Speaker 1: sure what it is, but we know you Seeson. The
Speaker 1: tournament of course in Las Vegas Crown, so we'll see
Speaker 1: what happens there. But side Lease, I spent some time
Speaker 1: about a week ago with the great leader of Ron's Roost,
Speaker 1: and she is fabulous, ninety seven ninety eight years old.
Speaker 1: And to have those make it into their nineties like
Speaker 1: side Lease, and as Elmer did that. Of course his
Speaker 1: sausage company is a great thing. But say a little
Speaker 1: bit of a prayer for Simon Lesa's recovery in the hospital.
Speaker 1: We'll see what happens now. Thirdly, as you may know,
Speaker 1: there is an effort by the Trump administration to i
Speaker 1: won't say disregard to put it in his proper perspective
Speaker 1: federal court orders and over the weekend beginning on Friday.
Speaker 1: I have a timeline here from the Washington Post, which
Speaker 1: I trust a little bit but not a lot, that
Speaker 1: the President used the seventeen ninety eight Alien Enemies Act
Speaker 1: against violent Venezuelan gang members from trend Ragua, and he
Speaker 1: took two hundred and thirty eight of these vicious criminals
Speaker 1: and sent them to Al Salvador. A little bit of
Speaker 1: a timeline. On Friday, White House Council suggested to the
Speaker 1: President that he could do this without shall we say
Speaker 1: anyone's okay. Because he is the president, he's in charge
Speaker 1: of the executive function of the country, and so he
Speaker 1: wanted to keep it somewhat a secret. And I spoke
Speaker 1: to a certain federal office holder who told me that
Speaker 1: the president issued the order, but somehow it leaked out
Speaker 1: on Friday that he intended to have ice personnel directly
Speaker 1: or indirectly. This could have been handed out to a
Speaker 1: separate company to transport these individuals not to Venezuela, but
Speaker 1: rather to El Salvador. And so when it leaked out,
Speaker 1: members of the ACLU got together and said, you know what,
Speaker 1: this is illegal that the president cannot use a seventeen
Speaker 1: ninety eight Alien Enemy Act to get out of the
Speaker 1: country quickly without a hearing enemy combatants. And it's been
Speaker 1: used before in the War of eighteen twelve, World War One,
Speaker 1: and World War Two. It's not been used since nineteen
Speaker 1: forty three. Last time it was used was Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean it's not legal anymore. Of course, it's
Speaker 1: legal if the Constitution was written in seventeen eighty seven,
Speaker 1: for God's sakes, and we kind of are governed by that.
Speaker 1: And so somehow it leaked out that this flight was
Speaker 1: going to go from Miami to El Salvador, skipping Venezuela,
Speaker 1: and then on board would be two hundred and thirty
Speaker 1: eight of the worst of the worst gangbangers from Venezuela
Speaker 1: who are creating havoc all over the Midwest, including burglaries
Speaker 1: and homes, including rape and robbery, and drug sales and
Speaker 1: human trafficking, the worst of the worst. So when this
Speaker 1: leaked out, there were calls made between the ACLU and
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice that were not returned, and so
Speaker 1: the flight was hurried along. Sometime on Saturday, the flight
Speaker 1: took off from Miami and of course went over the
Speaker 1: Gulf of America, through the Yucatan into El Salvador. Now,
Speaker 1: according to the timeline, let me share with you the timeline.
Speaker 1: We're talking about whether it happened before or after six
Speaker 1: thirty eight. And so the timeline is this. And there's
Speaker 1: a big hearing today at five o'clock in Washington Federal
Speaker 1: Court conducted by a federal judge who was appointed by Obama,
Speaker 1: who's extremely liberal. The President signed the executive order involving
Speaker 1: the Alien Enemies Act on Friday night, but intentionally did
Speaker 1: not advertise it or post it, nor does he have to,
Speaker 1: by the way. On Saturday morning, word of the order
Speaker 1: leaked out, prompting a man scramble to get the planes
Speaker 1: in the air quickly. So at two thirty one pm
Speaker 1: on Saturday, an immigration activist who tracks deportation flights posting
Speaker 1: on x Run of course by Elon Musk that quote
Speaker 1: two highly unusual ice flights unquote were departing to Al
Speaker 1: Salvador from Miami, which had agreed to accept the Venezuelan
Speaker 1: gang members deported from the US. The leader of Al
Speaker 1: Salvador said that we're being paid to do this to US.
Speaker 1: It's a lot of money. To the US, it's no money.
Speaker 1: The amount quoted in the post story is six million
Speaker 1: dollars a month to house these two hundred and thirty
Speaker 1: eight and every year their status is re examined. Hours later,
Speaker 1: during a court hearing filed by the ACLU. This is
Speaker 1: on a Saturday afternoon, Judge Boseburg, a very liberal leftist
Speaker 1: judge appointed by Obama, ordered a halt of the deportations
Speaker 1: and said any flights should be turned around immediately. Now.
Speaker 1: This was sometime closed to six pm on Saturday, he said,
Speaker 1: quote from the bench, quote this is something that you
Speaker 1: need to make sure is complied with immediately, quote unquote,
Speaker 1: he told the Department of Justice lawyers in front of him,
Speaker 1: and that at that point about six point fifty one pm,
Speaker 1: which would have been about twenty one minutes later, both
Speaker 1: flights were off the Yucatan Peninsula, according to flight pass
Speaker 1: posted on X. SO, now the issue becomes this, what
Speaker 1: did the president know and when did he know it?
Speaker 1: Of course, the president posted on x a few hours
Speaker 1: ago that everything was legal and done. So the Trump administration,
Speaker 1: according to the left wingers, tells radical Judge Bozeman to
Speaker 1: pound sand following controversial ruling. That's not exactly the case,
Speaker 1: but nonetheless it may be Germaine. Two issues, One, where
Speaker 1: was the flight when the order was journalized? And secondly,
Speaker 1: who was conducting the flight? Was it federal employees through
Speaker 1: ICE or was it a subcontractor working with ICE. Let's
Speaker 1: talk about generalization for a moment. A judge says lots
Speaker 1: of things from the bench orally, verbally, but a court
Speaker 1: only speaks through its records, through its journal, the Clerk
Speaker 1: of Court's office, and so normally if a judge says
Speaker 1: something from the bench, it is not shall I say, legal,
Speaker 1: or enforceable until it's reduced to writing and filed in
Speaker 1: the clerk's office, which on a Saturday afternoon at six
Speaker 1: o'clock may take some time. So one of the arguments
Speaker 1: available to the Trump administration at this point is to say, look,
Speaker 1: the judge said it from the bench, but it's not
Speaker 1: an enforceable order until it's journalized, and it wasn't generalized
Speaker 1: till later Saturday night. Secondly, the oral statement from the
Speaker 1: bench took a couple hours to become journalized, and in
Speaker 1: that time, a plane going six hundred miles an hour
Speaker 1: two hours is going to go twelve hundred miles. They're
Speaker 1: well outside the jurisdiction of any federal court right now
Speaker 1: as I speak this Monday afternoon, about ten to one
Speaker 1: o'clock in the afternoon, these two hundred and thirty eight
Speaker 1: to Venezuelan gang members are in a terrible El Salvadorian prison,
Speaker 1: which is okay with me, for the acts they committed.
Speaker 1: The ACLU would like each of the two hundred and
Speaker 1: thirty eight to have separate hearings, separate fact finders, separate
Speaker 1: witnesses that would take years to conduct. And that's not
Speaker 1: the way foreign relations out of work or enemy's combatants
Speaker 1: out of work. I could not imagine a federal judge
Speaker 1: stepping in and saying, you know what, on Saturday, Trump
Speaker 1: should not have bombed parts of the Hoodies stronghold in Yemen.
Speaker 1: I can't imagine a federal judge saying that you can't
Speaker 1: use drone strikes against hesblah. I can't imagine a federal
Speaker 1: judge saying, you know what, not enough eighties being provided
Speaker 1: to Afghanistan rebels, You got to have to provide more money.
Speaker 1: I can't imagine the federal judge saying, you know what,
Speaker 1: President Trump should hire and fire employees of the judiciary
Speaker 1: or of the Congress. How is it possible that judges
Speaker 1: can tell the executive branch of government, that is, the
Speaker 1: President Donald Trump, who to hire, who to retain, and
Speaker 1: who to fire in the executive branch of government. The
Speaker 1: Constitution says the full absolute power executive power of the
Speaker 1: United States of America rest within the office of the
Speaker 1: President of the United States. And so if Donald Trump
Speaker 1: would say I want to hire or not hire, or
Speaker 1: fire or not fire staff of the members of Congress,
Speaker 1: would anyone pay attention to that. I don't think so.
Speaker 1: If Donald Trump would say, you know what, I want
Speaker 1: to hire and fire employees of the US Supreme Court,
Speaker 1: the US Supreme Court would say, now, wait a minute,
Speaker 1: you can't do that. So how is it possible that
Speaker 1: a federal judge can tell the executive branch of government
Speaker 1: who to hire and who to fire inside the executive
Speaker 1: branch of government. It's kind of an odd thing. Now
Speaker 1: the Democrats believe that you can actually tell employees of
Speaker 1: the executive branch of government when to work, how to work,
Speaker 1: how often the work, to come to work or not
Speaker 1: come to work, or to be paid or not be paid,
Speaker 1: or to be hired, retain, fire, to put on probationary status.
Speaker 1: I'm confident down the road the US Supreme Court is
Speaker 1: going to say, the entire executive power of the government
Speaker 1: rests within the office the President, the legislative power rest
Speaker 1: within the Congress, and the judicial power represents within the
Speaker 1: US Judiciary. And neither the head of each of those
Speaker 1: three branches of government cannot tell the other branch who
Speaker 1: to hire, who not to fire. Doesn't work that way.
Speaker 1: I can't imagine this judge, Judge of Boseburg actually telling,
Speaker 1: for example, of the President during a time he declared
Speaker 1: war in a sense against these alien gangs, how to
Speaker 1: do it, where to do it? How to conduct your operation? Now,
Speaker 1: this judge is very liberal, and he was appointed by Obama.
Speaker 1: Judge Boseburg, and he's the most liberal judge in the
Speaker 1: DC circuit. He's one of eight hundred, and the ACLU
Speaker 1: will pick the file in front of various judges complaints
Speaker 1: and issues that they anticipate a favorable result. We can't have.
Speaker 1: It's total chaos. To consider that when you have eight
Speaker 1: hundred federal judges, each of them cannot have their separate
Speaker 1: foreign policy, each of them have different opinions about how
Speaker 1: to conduct business affairs and the executive branch of government.
Speaker 1: That is chaos in Ohio. And maybe the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: will take this up. You have one Common Police Court
Speaker 1: judge in this case in handlet accounting, shutting down legislative
Speaker 1: acts by Columbus by the legislature in all eighty eight counties. Well,
Speaker 1: how does that work? I don't know how many Common
Speaker 1: Police Court judges are there, there might be four or
Speaker 1: five hundred. Each of them cannot be restraining some other
Speaker 1: individual outside their county. So the argument that the Trumpster
Speaker 1: has is, look, I declared these individuals subject to this
Speaker 1: enemy's act, and they're bad ombres, and we cannot have
Speaker 1: separate hearings for two hundred and thirty eight. And by
Speaker 1: the way, they're already in El Salvador. So the issue becomes,
Speaker 1: what's the remedy? Assuming the lawyers and the Department of
Speaker 1: Justice did not tell Pambondi and did not tell Donald
Speaker 1: Trump exactly what the judge had ruled orally verbally before
Speaker 1: it was journalized, how do you hold someone into account?
Speaker 1: What is the remedy you're seeking? The remedy is a
Speaker 1: hearing for these two hundred and thirty eight. They're in
Speaker 1: some other country right now, and the remedy they seek
Speaker 1: cannot be enjoined by the judge. He can't say to
Speaker 1: the Al al Salvador president, by the way, fly back
Speaker 1: to two hundred and thirty eight people, because that president
Speaker 1: of El Salvador is not subject to the jurisdiction of
Speaker 1: the federal courts. And looking forward, this is something that
Speaker 1: must be litigated. How intimately involved in the executive function
Speaker 1: of government should a judge be Can he declare don't
Speaker 1: make any drone strikes in Yemen. Can he say, Army, Navy,
Speaker 1: Air Force Marines don't listen to the orders of the
Speaker 1: commander in chief. Can he say, you know, mister President,
Speaker 1: you have to keep retained members of the executive branch
Speaker 1: of government that are not doing their job or doing
Speaker 1: their job. Can the judiciary member reach into the White
Speaker 1: House and demand adherence to an order that they have
Speaker 1: no jurisdiction to make in the first place. So sometime
Speaker 1: in the next few hours we're going to find out
Speaker 1: how angry Judge Bosburg is at the Trump Department of
Speaker 1: Justice for not obeying his order which could not be
Speaker 1: obeyed if they're correct that the plane was over the
Speaker 1: Yucatan outside the jurisdiction of that particular judge. Also, if
Speaker 1: this is, shall we say, denied by the DC, at
Speaker 1: some point it would behoove the President to act quickly
Speaker 1: to get these House Salvadorian or Chilean gangbangers out of
Speaker 1: the country before they cause any more heavoc. So we'll
Speaker 1: see what happens. Now, let's continue with more of course
Speaker 1: rets baseball back at it, and a week from Thursday,
Speaker 1: it all happens right here on the big one. Coming
Speaker 1: up after one o'clock today will be State Representative Adam Bird.
Speaker 1: Bird is the word about what's happening in Columbus. The
Speaker 1: governor has now come out to say these dog attacks
Speaker 1: have got to stop, and if they're not stopped, those
Speaker 1: own these dogs should be punished. But the Speaker of
Speaker 1: the House, Mister Speakers, said it's a low priority item
Speaker 1: for the seventeen thousand Ohioans bitten and disfigured by dogs
Speaker 1: over the past year. That maybe to an extent, the
Speaker 1: Speaker said, it doesn't matter as much as the state budget. Plus,
Speaker 1: after two o'clock today will be Congressman Warren Davidson about
Speaker 1: this stuff relative to the cr and also can the
Speaker 1: president get out of the country quickly gang backers without
Speaker 1: a hearing. We'll see what happens. So let's continue with more.
Speaker 1: And Xavier is in the tournament. I say some you
Speaker 1: see faithful say they're not in the tournament. But I
Speaker 1: think you're in the field of sixty eight. But you're
Speaker 1: not in the field of sixty four. So in the
Speaker 1: field of sixty four, guess what Xavier should be there
Speaker 1: if they beat Texas on Wednesday night to tip off
Speaker 1: about nine oh five in DraftKings have Xavier about a
Speaker 1: two and a half point favorite. So let's continue with
Speaker 1: more twelve to fifty five. Home of your Reds News
Speaker 1: Radio seven hundred Wow. Let's continue now, Billy Cunningham, the
Speaker 1: Great America. Of course, State Representative Adam Bird located in
Speaker 1: and around New Richmond, the home of the Lions, as
Speaker 1: one of the leaders of the House of Representatives. In Columbus.
Speaker 1: Last week, Governor Mike Dewaine gave a State of the
Speaker 1: Union State of the State address, which I understand went
Speaker 1: on for about an hour and a half. Lots in there.
Speaker 1: This could be one of his last ones because he's
Speaker 1: leaving office at the end of next year. But until then,
Speaker 1: State Representative Adam Bird, welcome again to the Bill Cunningham
Speaker 1: Show and the State Rep. Bird. Before we talk about
Speaker 1: the taxes, all the new taxes, Governor Dewaines said he
Speaker 1: wants to raise on almost everything. I want to talk
Speaker 1: with you briefly about Ohio dog laws, which you kind
Speaker 1: of a lot of us smile when I hear that.
Speaker 1: But in my younger days, I did a lot of
Speaker 1: personal injury work of those who are not bitten by dogs,
Speaker 1: I mean chewed on and almost murdered killed by dogs,
Speaker 1: including losing thumbs and fingers and ears at dogs. We've
Speaker 1: had a rash of these, especially in Coleraine Township, which
Speaker 1: is the opposite side of the world from you. But
Speaker 1: a woman, an older woman, was killed. We had a
Speaker 1: little girl in Roselawn that was eaten alive by two dogs.
Speaker 1: We've had numerous other individuals in and around the tri
Speaker 1: State that have been disfigured by dogs. And I read
Speaker 1: out of a Columbus Dispatch story. I'm sure you're aware
Speaker 1: of that dogs attack about seventeen thousand people a year
Speaker 1: in Ohio. And that's the tip of the iceberg. As
Speaker 1: many of the dog attacks are not even to report it.
Speaker 1: The actual total is double and triple that victims experience disfigurement, death, amputations,
Speaker 1: psychological trauma, and huge medical bills. And dog owners often
Speaker 1: get a one bite rule, which is, well, your pit
Speaker 1: bull or your German shepherd can have one big bite.
Speaker 1: We'll let that go and pay a minimal fine and
Speaker 1: go out the door. What can you do to correct that?
Speaker 1: If anything?
Speaker 4: Great to be with you today, Bill, and this is
Speaker 4: a very interesting topic, and you know I do command
Speaker 4: the Columbus Dispatch for running this story because it's not
Speaker 4: something that I think a lot of us know about.
Speaker 4: And if you have a dog that you're not in
Speaker 4: control of and it is assaulting other people and disfiguring
Speaker 4: and naming, that is that should be taken care of
Speaker 4: in law. And if current law is not adequately protecting
Speaker 4: people from unsupervised dogs, we've got to take care of that,
Speaker 4: and we've got to amend the law. And that's whit
Speaker 4: it's called the Ohirivise Code because we're revising it when
Speaker 4: we find out about issues that are not, you know,
Speaker 4: taking care of I know.
Speaker 1: You're a headquarter there in Claremont County by the front
Speaker 1: Street grill. But here in Hamleton County, we had a
Speaker 1: dog warden who was called of the scene of this
Speaker 1: vicious assault on a mother of three. Her arms were
Speaker 1: chewed off, she had her legs bitten and it looked
Speaker 1: like she went through a looked like she went through
Speaker 1: accusin art. It looked like her life. Her life is
Speaker 1: over as she knows that she has years of therapy.
Speaker 1: And when called to the scene, the dog warden said
Speaker 1: hamily guny dog warden said, well, I can't get the
Speaker 1: dogs because they're too vicious, And the neighbors are saying,
Speaker 1: what the hell are you saying? That's like a cop
Speaker 1: going to a bank robbery saying, well, I don't want
Speaker 1: to get involved in the bank robbery. Those robbers look
Speaker 1: too mean, so what in the hell. And I'm looking
Speaker 1: at that, I'm thinking that can't be the case. And secondly,
Speaker 1: we need strict liability on dogs. That is how many
Speaker 1: times when I had Little Schnorf in the Peanut Head
Speaker 1: and magazine, You'd open the door, they'd run out all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, and then you chase them down to
Speaker 1: make sure they didn't get hurt. If I had a
Speaker 1: pit Bull or a Master or a German Shepherd, I'd
Speaker 1: be a lot more cautious. We need strict liability. I
Speaker 1: can't imagine Adam Bird. If one of the people in
Speaker 1: Coraane township that try to help that mother of three
Speaker 1: save her life and now she's maimed for life. If
Speaker 1: some neighbor, if a human being had done to her
Speaker 1: what those two dogs had done, they'd be locked up
Speaker 1: for years. How come dog owners can have dogs that
Speaker 1: do this and there's no penalty at all.
Speaker 2: You got.
Speaker 1: I know it.
Speaker 4: I don't really feel responsible for that. But anyway, to
Speaker 4: your point, there are multiple issues here. One is the
Speaker 4: dog itself and what are we going to do about that?
Speaker 4: And are we going to continue to give them one
Speaker 4: free bite before you make them bite a second time?
Speaker 4: And then secondly, are we going to do something about
Speaker 4: the owner of the dog who doesn't properly control them
Speaker 4: and doesn't provide safety for their neighbors around a dog
Speaker 4: that you know they're not keeping on a lease, they're
Speaker 4: not controlling, And so you've got two separate issues there
Speaker 4: right now.
Speaker 1: Secondly, I don't know if you saw this out of
Speaker 1: out of New York City, a massive new study shows
Speaker 1: that the serious mental side effects following gender affirming surgery,
Speaker 1: this story goes honest. Say, I'll have the report here
Speaker 1: that after studying this issue for more than fifteen years
Speaker 1: that those Americans who feel, especially if they're miners, that
Speaker 1: as a parent you have to allow hormonal treatment and
Speaker 1: then gender affirming surgery, that the mental problems after the
Speaker 1: surgery are worse than before. Suicides after are worse than before,
Speaker 1: alcoholism drug use is worse after than before. Can you
Speaker 1: tell the American people as we sit here this a
Speaker 1: Monday afternoon. What is the status as we speak about
Speaker 1: a fourteen year old boy who believes, becau the culture,
Speaker 1: et cetera, that he's really a girl. Well, and what
Speaker 1: is the what are the laws in Ohio that either stop, prohibit,
Speaker 1: or encourage parents to take a child and go through
Speaker 1: a sexual mutilation. What is the current state of the law?
Speaker 4: Sure? Bill, And you know you bring up the word
Speaker 4: gender affirming care that phrase right there, I reject that
Speaker 4: because there's nothing affirming or caring about mutilating the body
Speaker 4: of a young person. And so you've got to really
Speaker 4: question parents who are willing to take their child down
Speaker 4: that path. And when you talk about suicide issues, Bill,
Speaker 4: you know, are other increased suicide issues reflective of this
Speaker 4: of it? Yes, but that's because of what you just said.
Speaker 4: Because after they have gone through the process of chemical
Speaker 4: castration or actual physical removal a part of their body
Speaker 4: that they have deep from regret and remorse, and they
Speaker 4: you know, there's no going back from it at that point.
Speaker 4: And so you ask, what can we do an Ohio Bill,
Speaker 4: We've already done something. We've had HOSTO sixty eight. And
Speaker 4: you may recall that your friend, Governor duwant detoed that bill,
Speaker 4: and then we had to come back as a state
Speaker 4: legislature and come back and override his vetot and establish
Speaker 4: and restore the safety of our under eighteen aged people
Speaker 4: here in Ohio. Now you can still go get you
Speaker 4: can go get the surgery or get the chemical castration
Speaker 4: at age nineteen or age eighteen, but we don't allow
Speaker 4: that in Ohio anymore if you're underage.
Speaker 1: And so if you're twenty years old and you've been
Speaker 1: listening to the popular culture and you suddenly want to
Speaker 1: go from Bruce Jenner to Missus Jenner and you're over
Speaker 1: the age of eighteen, you can do it. In fact,
Speaker 1: I would say, look, if that's what you want to
Speaker 1: do with your own body, no other other bodies involved
Speaker 1: in like abortion. If you want to go through gender
Speaker 1: affirming care, get homeown or treatment, et cetera, have at it.
Speaker 1: It's your body. Go ahead, but know that this massive study.
Speaker 1: Let me share with you a couple of findings. One
Speaker 1: massive study of more than one hundred and five thousand
Speaker 1: who had gender affirming surgery found some disturbing trends. Published
Speaker 1: in the Journal of Sexual Medicine of the AMA track
Speaker 1: to one hundred and seven thousand patients aged eighteen and
Speaker 1: older with gender dysphoria. Researchers assessed their mental health two
Speaker 1: years after the surgery and found the transgender person suffered
Speaker 1: from quote heightened psychological distress, including depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation,
Speaker 1: partially due to stigma and the lack of gender affirmation.
Speaker 1: Twenty five percent faced more depression. There was eleven point
Speaker 1: five percent more suicides, which is said, and similar trends
Speaker 1: were examined for males and females. Alcoholism rates went up,
Speaker 1: drug use went up. In other words, going through the
Speaker 1: process is worse than not going through it. So maybe
Speaker 1: there's something at stake here other than one's genitalia. It
Speaker 1: could be a mental disorder.
Speaker 4: What do you think, Well, you know, you bring up
Speaker 4: gender dysphoria, and I believe the studies show that if
Speaker 4: you were experiencing gender dysphoria, that the natural cure for
Speaker 4: that is to go through adolescents, to allow your body
Speaker 4: and your hormones to go through life naturally normally, and
Speaker 4: as you age and as you change through those formative
Speaker 4: adolescent years and the hormones start flowing, that your gender
Speaker 4: dysphoria issues that you previously experience are naturally going to
Speaker 4: go away. But to your point, if you're twenty one
Speaker 4: and you still want to do this, I'm sorry. If
Speaker 4: you're eighteen and you still want to mutilate parts of
Speaker 4: your body, I believe we should allow adults to make
Speaker 4: those kinds of decisions for themselves. I don't think it's
Speaker 4: the right one to make, but the law in Ohio
Speaker 4: allows an eighteen year.
Speaker 1: Old to make that well. Sweden a liberal haven. Sweden
Speaker 1: National Board of Health and Welfare sets guidelines for care
Speaker 1: determine earlier this year that the risks of puberty blockers
Speaker 1: and treatments with hormones quote currently outweigh the possible benefits
Speaker 1: for miners. Therefore it will be ceased, and the NHS
Speaker 1: in England, which is in the midst of an independent
Speaker 1: review of gender identity services, recently said there is scarce
Speaker 1: and inconclusive evidence for support of clinical decision making for
Speaker 1: miners with gender dysphoria. They stopped it two and so
Speaker 1: we're about ten years behind these so called advanced countries
Speaker 1: in Sweden England that have tried this beginning about twenty
Speaker 1: five years ago and they're telling us it's not working. Now,
Speaker 1: if you're in California, a representative Adam Byrd, or you're
Speaker 1: in Chicago, Illinois, of Boston, Massachusetts, guess what, it's a
Speaker 1: free fire zone. In fact, parents have told me, Adam Byrd,
Speaker 1: that if my sixteen year old wants to become a
Speaker 1: different gender, I'd rather have a living son than a
Speaker 1: dead daughter, which is a nice phrase untethered to reality. However,
Speaker 1: the doctor might say is got to be done, the
Speaker 1: children's hospital might say it should be done. The government
Speaker 1: will pay for it. And so if you're in one
Speaker 1: of these blue areas, you're in a difficult situation, correct
Speaker 1: as a child. And in California, if the child goes
Speaker 1: to school and starts identifying by a different gender, and
Speaker 1: where's different clothing at school, the school can't tell the
Speaker 1: parent what's happening at school. So if you're in a
Speaker 1: blue area, what the hell do you do there?
Speaker 4: You go? You got to get out, Billy, You got
Speaker 4: to get to a red state because they are not
Speaker 4: going to protect children the way the state of Ohio
Speaker 4: protects them. And recall also bill that in Ohio, you
Speaker 4: as a if you're a teacher, you cannot hide the
Speaker 4: gender transporia conversation that you might be having with a
Speaker 4: student from the parent. If you have it one time,
Speaker 4: you know you can have it one time. But if
Speaker 4: you talk more than once about it to in any
Speaker 4: kind of counseling session, you have to tell the parents.
Speaker 4: And you cannot call someone boy or girl by an
Speaker 4: opposite gender name at school without letting the parents know.
Speaker 4: So we have a lot of protections here. This is
Speaker 4: a protective state. We care about children, we care about
Speaker 4: the family, and we're not going to allow those kinds
Speaker 4: of things to happen. We have a restroom bill in
Speaker 4: Ohio that says you have to go if you're a male,
Speaker 4: you got to go in the male restroom, if you're
Speaker 4: a female, you got to go in the female restroom.
Speaker 4: And so we're going to protect the family, protect kids,
Speaker 4: and these blue states aren't doing it right now, Billy,
Speaker 4: and if I was recommending to a parent, get out
Speaker 4: of there before they try to take your child away
Speaker 4: from you. Now.
Speaker 1: Lastly, on tax increases, the governor proposed lots of new
Speaker 1: taxes last week in the State of the State address,
Speaker 1: including on cigarettes booze, and he wants to double the
Speaker 1: tax on marijuana, which will drive too many into the
Speaker 1: dark market. One of the best things that's happening now
Speaker 1: with marijuana, there's about five to eight thousand people working
Speaker 1: otherwise weren't working in the marijuana, the processing, the growing,
Speaker 1: and in the storefronts, et cetera. You also have about
Speaker 1: a billion dollars this year in twenty twenty five coming
Speaker 1: out of the pockets of drug dealers and going into
Speaker 1: the pockets of the people of the state of Ohio.
Speaker 1: The governor wants to double that tax is not going
Speaker 1: to fly.
Speaker 4: I don't see it by you. I don't know if
Speaker 4: you watch the governor state of the state of drash yesterday,
Speaker 4: Basically he spent about one hundred minutes outlining his priorities
Speaker 4: and his budget, and there were a couple of times
Speaker 4: where he got very tepid applause. And that would include
Speaker 4: additional taxes on cigarettes, additional taxes on marijuana and online gaming,
Speaker 4: and so doubling many of those taxes. And you know,
Speaker 4: most Republicans, most conservative leaning people aren't big on the
Speaker 4: issue of increasing taxes. And even though you know, personally
Speaker 4: I am, I'm not a fan of cigarettes, especially because
Speaker 4: they are you know, they shortened people's lives, and they
Speaker 4: they put people on Medicaid, and there's all kinds of
Speaker 4: things that are that go along with cigarette use. But
Speaker 4: still I'm not going to support it. I don't believe
Speaker 4: Republicans in the Ohio House are going to support any
Speaker 4: kind of tax increase for these things.
Speaker 1: Well, he's talking about a one percent tax increase in marijuana,
Speaker 1: and I don't drink, I don't use cigarettes, never had
Speaker 1: pot in my life, and I don't gamble online. Line
Speaker 1: those up. Those is so called the sins. In other words,
Speaker 1: we're going to punish you for sinful behavior. Does Ohio
Speaker 1: have a revenue problem? What does Ohio have a spending
Speaker 1: problem to increase all these taxes? Which is that do
Speaker 1: we have do we spend too much or collect too
Speaker 1: little in tax.
Speaker 4: Well, I think that we always are concerned about efficiency,
Speaker 4: and of course Ohio, where we're we are, we have
Speaker 4: to we have to spend what we take in. We
Speaker 4: can't spend more like the federal government can can. And
Speaker 4: so the issue of taxing, we we have reduced taxes
Speaker 4: over the last two General assemblies. BILLT We've reduced income
Speaker 4: taxes for the state of Ohio and right now. I
Speaker 4: believe our priorities are property taxes, and our property taxes
Speaker 4: are going our rocketing because property valuations are skyrocketing, and
Speaker 4: we've got to do something about that to the best
Speaker 4: of our ability. I do think that skyrocketing property valuations
Speaker 4: are going to go down because as we experience the
Speaker 4: Trump years, the Trump the budget, I think that he
Speaker 4: is going to take care of inflation pressures, and when
Speaker 4: that drops, I think property valuations will drop and will
Speaker 4: ease some of this. But in the short term, we
Speaker 4: that's got to be our new renewed focus in Columbus.
Speaker 4: We've taken care of some income taxes by dropping them.
Speaker 4: It's time to bring some property tax really to ohiolands,
Speaker 4: and we need to do that quickly.
Speaker 1: You know, there's probably a lot of Claremont County residents
Speaker 1: on a fixed income that makes less than fifty thousand
Speaker 1: dollars a year. Their house is worth less than a
Speaker 1: half a million, probably a lot less than a half million.
Speaker 1: And I heard one of your colleagues said there should
Speaker 1: be either no property tax or very little if you
Speaker 1: have less than fifty thousand dollars in income and your
Speaker 1: house is worth one hundred thousand dollars a year, and
Speaker 1: you're in a situation where we have skyrocketing property expenses.
Speaker 1: Is that happening in Claremont County by the way.
Speaker 4: Oh, my goodness, Bill, Yes it is. We had one
Speaker 4: of the highest increases in property valuations in the state
Speaker 4: of Ohio. It was like forty three percent a year ago.
Speaker 4: And so that is very painful to grandma and grandpa.
Speaker 4: You know, you've brought up people of low income, how
Speaker 4: about people of no income or retired income, and we're
Speaker 4: asking these people to pay skyrocketing property taxes and through
Speaker 4: no fall to their owning. You may recall back in
Speaker 4: the presidential election that Kamala Harris talked about unrealized capital
Speaker 4: gains tax. That's essentially what we do in Ohio with
Speaker 4: our property taxes. Bill, if your house, if you purchased
Speaker 4: a house for one hundred thousand dollars and now it's
Speaker 4: value at two hundred thousand dollars, we're going to tax
Speaker 4: you on your property at two hundred thousand, even though
Speaker 4: you've not technically realized any kind of game there. And
Speaker 4: that's something that's got to stop.
Speaker 1: Well, hopefully if the governor doesn't maintains this and wants
Speaker 1: to double the tax on the so called sins that
Speaker 1: you and the legislature can over rule him like you
Speaker 1: did on the transgender care. I think Children's Hospital in Cincinnati,
Speaker 1: by the way, is complying with state law, which is
Speaker 1: a positive right.
Speaker 4: It is, And I believe you're right. I believe that
Speaker 4: they are complying. I believe that hospitals all over the
Speaker 4: Ohio are doing that. Could they be referring to people
Speaker 4: to out of state? That they could be And you've
Speaker 4: made mention of blue states that are still doing these things,
Speaker 4: and I suspect there might be some referrals to to
Speaker 4: their clients to go out of state, but I don't
Speaker 4: believe it's happening here. And and so you know, Bill,
Speaker 4: you got Doublin Dewant on your show all the time.
Speaker 4: Maybe you should mention to him about your opposition to
Speaker 4: some of these tax increases.
Speaker 1: I will do that next week the week there after,
Speaker 1: getting ready for Reds Baseball coming up a week from Thursday.
Speaker 1: But Adam Bird, you're the best out there. I want
Speaker 1: to buy you a hotty talk maybe some chicken wings
Speaker 1: at Front Street Grille at some point this summer.
Speaker 4: Hey, you know, I think Governor Dwaine's going to be
Speaker 4: in town for Reds Opening Day. Maybe you can interviewing
Speaker 4: live or that's something like that.
Speaker 1: That's it.
Speaker 4: He loves to come to Reds opening Day.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm gonna pin him to the wall on this one. No,
Speaker 1: we don't have a revenue problem. We collect enough money.
Speaker 1: We have a spending problem in Ohio. That's why. But
Speaker 1: vaked Ramaswami's gonna bring those to Ohio. By the way,
Speaker 1: thirty seconds remaining. Do you like the vike Ramaswami or
Speaker 1: David Yoes for governor?
Speaker 4: Like them both? Bill, I don't like tough primaries. These
Speaker 4: are both good conservative men that have that have been
Speaker 4: conservative warriors and and there's a lot to like about
Speaker 4: both of them. And you know, once got to Trump endorsement.
Speaker 4: One's been elected four times statewide and has has defending
Speaker 4: conservative values across the state of Ohio multiple times as
Speaker 4: attorney general. So, uh, you know, that's where we're at it.
Speaker 4: It's going to be a tough primary for sure.
Speaker 1: And Adam Byird, God bless you, and God bless America.
Speaker 1: Ada Bird, thank you very much for coming on the
Speaker 1: Bill Cunningham Show. Thank you, Stake rep. Thank you.
Speaker 4: Great to be with you, sir, love being with the
Speaker 4: great American.
Speaker 1: God bless America. Thank you. Let's continue with more news
Speaker 1: coming up next at your home of the Red's getting
Speaker 1: ready for Reds Baseball a week from Thursday on news
Speaker 1: Radio seven hundred WLW.
Speaker 5: You know this, man, I ain't never gonna be the
Speaker 5: guy that stands up and makes damn excuses like I
Speaker 5: ain't ever gonna do it. I just need anybody that
Speaker 5: follows our program im It'll never happen. Okay, no matter
Speaker 5: how frustrated and pissed off I am, it ain't ever happening.
Speaker 5: Never gonna make excuses, but I'll talk about challenges. So
Speaker 5: don't get the two damn things confused.
Speaker 6: Okay, hello, quiet, I'm.
Speaker 1: Broadcasting all right, man, First of all, about this, Yeah,
Speaker 1: is Xavier in the tournament or in the playing tournament
Speaker 1: to get to the tournament? Are they in or are
Speaker 1: they out unless they lose or win. I say they're
Speaker 1: in the tournament, but some you see faith will say
Speaker 1: they're not in the tournament. They're in the playing tournament.
Speaker 1: And if you're in the play in, you're not in.
Speaker 1: I say they're in.
Speaker 7: What you say, well, that's typical of UC fans because
Speaker 7: they're in the Crown. They're going to play De paul
Speaker 7: Out in Las Vegas in a couple of weeks, So
Speaker 7: they're not in the dance. Xavier's in the dance as
Speaker 7: far as the sixty some teams involved.
Speaker 1: So live with it, Clifton, live with it. Well, how
Speaker 1: about about speaking of that? Says I'm a Xavier alumnus.
Speaker 1: What about NKU segment. They're not in it. They're not
Speaker 1: in at all. No, they're in nothing. Right. Remember remember a.
Speaker 7: Few years ago, Willie, we used to have we used
Speaker 7: to have more teams in the NCAA tournament than we
Speaker 7: had radio stations here.
Speaker 1: Remember that Miami.
Speaker 7: You see the Indiana, Ohio State, Kentucky, Louisville, n.
Speaker 1: KU, everybody, everybody, the royals, Cincinnai royals, thank you. Now
Speaker 1: we have Miami had like a twenty point lead on law.
Speaker 1: And how about this, how about this with Miami.
Speaker 7: Oh, by the way, West Virginia governor, the West Virginia
Speaker 7: governor is going to take legal action against the NCAA
Speaker 7: selection committee on leaving the Mountaineers out of the tournament.
Speaker 1: What's what?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 7: And then guess what Miami University there at the director
Speaker 7: of athletics, David A Sailor critical of the NIT process
Speaker 7: on x Today after he says the RedHawks were denied
Speaker 7: a bid to the postseason tournament.
Speaker 1: Because of Trump.
Speaker 7: No, because Miami was twenty five and nine under Travis
Speaker 7: Steele fourteen to four. They defeated ken State in the
Speaker 7: MAC Tournament to reach the championship and they and the
Speaker 7: NIT took Kent State. So Miami's in the No, Miami
Speaker 7: is nothing. They're not going to play. They go, thank you.
Speaker 1: They lost.
Speaker 7: They lost by two points because La Coda East standout
Speaker 7: Nate Johnson uh made the game winning basket the other
Speaker 7: night in the championship game of the MAC Tournament in Cleveland, and.
Speaker 1: The n i T denied Miami a bid. Now that
Speaker 1: is incredible. So let's face it, Dayton's not in Miami.
Speaker 1: Dayton's in the n i T. That doesn't count. That's
Speaker 1: it does, Yes, it does.
Speaker 3: Well.
Speaker 7: The Ohio State basketball program, they're not going to the
Speaker 7: Big Dance either, and they they let's see there they
Speaker 7: were so they could have went to the Crown.
Speaker 1: But Ohio State says, naw ba, banah, We're done. That's it.
Speaker 7: Well, tell you, I mean, what's the West Virginia governor
Speaker 7: gonna do? Sue the n C double A to get
Speaker 7: them in Get.
Speaker 1: In front of that federal judge in Washington that'll order
Speaker 1: Trump how to conduct foreign policy. Get in front of
Speaker 1: that guy. They'll be in good shake.
Speaker 7: Will he the STUO reporters approach service of your local
Speaker 7: tame Star Heating and their conditioning dealers Tamestar quality you
Speaker 7: could feel in Cincinnati, called the experts at Preferred Home
Speaker 7: Comfort five one, three, eight nine to two hv A
Speaker 7: c S.
Speaker 1: Let's go to a Bengals update.
Speaker 7: Will he brought to you by good Spirits and Party
Speaker 7: Town with thirteen convenient northern Kentucky locations. Of course, the
Speaker 7: Bengals with the big news that many around here didn't
Speaker 7: think what happened and ripped on Bengals management for not
Speaker 7: getting it done.
Speaker 1: But the Bengals get it done. Jamar Chase T.
Speaker 7: Higgins Chase four years, one hundred and sixty one mil,
Speaker 7: Higgins one fifteen million.
Speaker 1: Oh, that's like money they're working on.
Speaker 7: They also signed free agent linebacker or In Burkes to
Speaker 7: a two year contract today and more reports are confirming
Speaker 7: now in Cincinnati, the trying very hard to retain sack
Speaker 7: Master Trey Hendrickson for years to come.
Speaker 1: SEGWA have an orthopedic surgeon coming up about pickleball injury,
Speaker 1: So get me out of the Studge Report. Getting ready
Speaker 1: for Congressman Warren Davidson after two o'clock segment, Get me
Speaker 1: out of the Studge Report? Will he in honor of
Speaker 1: h Let's see well. I guess well Xavier.
Speaker 7: And also we say congratulations to Pursell Marion four times
Speaker 7: state champions and the ladies there and the girls state
Speaker 7: champions over the weekend. We leave you with the immortal
Speaker 7: words of the Stood Report.
Speaker 1: Thank you segment. Thank you if you played pickleball. Listen
Speaker 1: up Bill Cunningham, News Radio seven hundred wl H right,
Speaker 1: Billy Cunningham, the Grand Marion. Of course, the Christ Hospital
Speaker 1: is the top hospital in the Tri State according to
Speaker 1: my opinion. I've been there many times and I love it.
Speaker 1: And doctor Jacob Gunzenhauser is an orthopedic surgeon. They're in
Speaker 1: a Christ Hospital, and he is an expert when it
Speaker 1: comes to injuries and disorders of the shoulders, the hips,
Speaker 1: and the knees, of which many of many of us
Speaker 1: now have because of pickleball, and I think the orthopedic
Speaker 1: surgeons are sponsoring pickleball matches, but nonetheless shoulders, hips and
Speaker 1: knees are his specially and doctor Gunzenhuser, welcome, I think
Speaker 1: for the first time to the Bill Cunningham Show and
Speaker 1: doctor what's the difference between pain and injury?
Speaker 6: They can both be the same. I mean injuries. We
Speaker 6: see a lot of orthopedic injuries.
Speaker 8: With sports and when they lead to pain and that
Speaker 8: keeps people from doing what they like to do, that's
Speaker 8: usually when we end up seeing them, when the pain
Speaker 8: brings them in.
Speaker 1: And can you tell the American people in the last say,
Speaker 1: ten or fifteen years, how has this changed? How has
Speaker 1: the world changed completely because of modern orthopedics at the
Speaker 1: christ Hospital. How's it different today than it was, say,
Speaker 1: ten years ago?
Speaker 6: How is orthopedics difference right?
Speaker 1: I know there's the advancements the past ten years. What
Speaker 1: are some of the major advancements.
Speaker 8: Some of the bigger advancements we've seen is outpatient surgery.
Speaker 8: You know, used to have a hip or near placement,
Speaker 8: you'd be in the hospital for maybe even over a week.
Speaker 8: These days where you get most people out of the
Speaker 8: hospital same day, they're able to sleep in their own
Speaker 8: bed that night.
Speaker 6: So the recovery process had come a long way.
Speaker 1: And so I have a friend of mine that had
Speaker 1: a joint replacement at the christ Hospital and they went
Speaker 1: in at six o'clock in the morning and they were
Speaker 1: at home by six o'clock at night. Outpatient procedures and
Speaker 1: so can you kind of tell the layman when you
Speaker 1: have a joint replacement of a hip, how can it
Speaker 1: be done in a way that doesn't cause a large scar?
Speaker 1: In fact, it's done laparoscopically. Kind of explained that to
Speaker 1: the American people.
Speaker 8: Well, I wouldn't say it's laparoscopic, but yes, it has
Speaker 8: become more minimally invasive invasive. A new procedure or not new,
Speaker 8: but anti hip replacement which one of her own, doctor Kirk,
Speaker 8: brought to Cincinnati that has really improved as far as
Speaker 8: the outcomes as well as the speed of recovery. It's
Speaker 8: an incision that's in the front of the hip rather
Speaker 8: than postially, which has increased or sorry improved the early
Speaker 8: rehab and really sped up recovery for most patients.
Speaker 1: In fact, I had a beloved aunt who had a
Speaker 1: hip replacement in the nineteen eighties. I think she was
Speaker 1: in the hospital for ten days. It took six months
Speaker 1: before she was back to normal. So if someone comes
Speaker 1: to the christ Hospital, say for hip replacement, what is
Speaker 1: the course of the future for them as far as
Speaker 1: rehabilitation getting back to normal. Everyone's different, But what approximately happens?
Speaker 8: Okay, Well, typically they come in that morning, the surgery
Speaker 8: takes about an hour, and like you said, they can
Speaker 8: go home that afternoon.
Speaker 6: You know, a fair amount of muscle.
Speaker 8: Soreness, soft tissue soreness for a couple of weeks, but
Speaker 8: usually by four weeks better than they were in six
Speaker 8: to eight weeks. Getting back to normal activities, we usually
Speaker 8: say it's about six months to a year before you
Speaker 8: don't even think about it anymore. Really what we call
Speaker 8: a forgotten joint, but that you know, back to most
Speaker 8: normal activities by six to eight weeks.
Speaker 1: And doctor Gunzenhauser, when I saw your good friend, doctor
Speaker 1: Dean Carriocus, and he gave me a hard val for
Speaker 1: it's called a taver, he said, you might have might
Speaker 1: have to get another one in maybe eight to ten years.
Speaker 1: Mine was done, believe it or not, about six years ago.
Speaker 1: I can't believe time flies. It's doing great right now,
Speaker 1: but he said, might have to do a second one.
Speaker 1: Is it unusual to have a second hip replacement or
Speaker 1: a second shoulder replacement? Is one one and you're done?
Speaker 8: Typically, well, the hip replacement technology has gotten so much
Speaker 8: better over the last ten to twenty years. The implants
Speaker 8: are much better, They're lasting a lot longer, and so
Speaker 8: typically we can expect at least twenty five years, and
Speaker 8: we think even going to be well over thirty years
Speaker 8: with the hip replacement now, so most people will not
Speaker 8: have to have it done at.
Speaker 1: This point thirty years. And as far as doing knees,
Speaker 1: a friend of mine and golf is going to have
Speaker 1: a double knee replacement. He wanted to do both together.
Speaker 1: I said, don't do that, but he wasn't at the
Speaker 1: christ hospital. Do you do double knees at the same time?
Speaker 8: I myself, I do not do double knees. I typically will
Speaker 8: do one k near replacement and then once recovered six
Speaker 8: six weeks to three months later, we can consider doing
Speaker 8: the other side.
Speaker 1: Why is that?
Speaker 3: It's it's a it's a it's.
Speaker 6: A fairly difficult recovery.
Speaker 8: The first couple of weeks and I think it's easier
Speaker 8: to have a good leg to stand on, and there
Speaker 8: is some evidence that doing both at the same time
Speaker 8: can have a higher risk of complications.
Speaker 1: Do you do second opinions? Does christ Hospital? Do you
Speaker 1: do you do second opinions?
Speaker 6: Yes?
Speaker 8: Of course we often give a lot of second opinions
Speaker 8: from and and I think we take pride in that.
Speaker 1: And are you offended of somebody with you once a
Speaker 1: second opinion? If someone says, you know, Doc, I want
Speaker 1: to go to second opinion? Do you say what.
Speaker 3: I say?
Speaker 6: Absolutely? I don't think I need.
Speaker 8: I think no doctor should ever be offended by someone
Speaker 8: won a second opinion. I think there's something wrong if
Speaker 8: they do. Honestly, I think that's it's always a healthy
Speaker 8: thing to get another opinion, especially if you're unsure of
Speaker 8: you know, whether you know whether you want to proceed
Speaker 8: with surgery or anything in that in that order, I
Speaker 8: think that's a good option.
Speaker 1: And Doc, what about not having surgery and going through
Speaker 1: options like PT or injections? Is it a ladder type deal?
Speaker 1: You start a PT, go to injections, then replacement, or
Speaker 1: sometimes you simply start with replacement.
Speaker 8: For the most part, you know, surgery is usually our
Speaker 8: last option. We like to try conservative treatments first. Like
Speaker 8: you said, physical therapy really well studied.
Speaker 6: Great great outcomes with that.
Speaker 8: That's usually our first go to other things like cortisone injections.
Speaker 8: You may hear of gel injections and PRP and those things.
Speaker 6: We can try those. So usually, you know, we try.
Speaker 8: Some conservaive treatments before surgery in most cases.
Speaker 1: Sounds good to me. And of course you're a local guy.
Speaker 1: You went to high school here, is that correct?
Speaker 6: Correct? They went to Turpin High School.
Speaker 1: The home of the Spartans. It's a fine high school there.
Speaker 1: And your dad was your dad was a doc at
Speaker 1: the Christ Hospital. And you play golf. What's your handicap
Speaker 1: by the way.
Speaker 8: Oh gosh, I think it's a sixth.
Speaker 1: That's too good. I like to go to an accountant
Speaker 1: with a high handicap. But six six is pretty good.
Speaker 1: But doctor Jacob, but guns and Hauser. Thanks coming on
Speaker 1: to Bill Cunningham Show and go to the website and
Speaker 1: need more information. But hips and shoulders and knees is
Speaker 1: your specialty. You know, you're a young guy. You got
Speaker 1: twenty or thirty more years to do it. And keep
Speaker 1: doing what you're doing. And when you see Debbie Hayes,
Speaker 1: the CEO of Christ tell her the great Americans.
Speaker 6: Said, Hello, appreciate it, thank you for having me.
Speaker 1: God bless America. Let's continue with more news next, that's
Speaker 1: your home of the Reds and so much more. News
Speaker 1: Radio seven hundred WLW, Billy Cunningham, the Great American of course,
Speaker 1: all health breaking roots. And the Congress of course passed
Speaker 1: on Friday to see r They have character different brothers
Speaker 1: called watch some of the morning talk shows, all health
Speaker 1: drinking roofs there and seemingly they are about eight hundred
Speaker 1: federal judges and each one of them has a different
Speaker 1: foreign policy. So on Saturday, there was an effort by
Speaker 1: a judge in Washington, DC to stop the arrest and
Speaker 1: conveyance of these vicious Venezuelan gangs to a third party
Speaker 1: that would have been Ol Salvador. We'll see how that's
Speaker 1: taking place and more. Plus, we have doze protests all
Speaker 1: over the country and they're targeting Tesla Tesla dealerships, and
Speaker 1: I'm told by Bloomberg, etc. The number one American made
Speaker 1: vehicle is a Tesla. Most American hands make it, and
Speaker 1: the products come from America and it's an ev but
Speaker 1: libers don't like that either. But Janan, you and I
Speaker 1: now as Congressman more and Davidson one of the leaders
Speaker 1: in the House. He's a graduate of Notre Dame. He's
Speaker 1: also a veteran. He watched the Berlin wall fall. He's
Speaker 1: also went through West Point and served many years in
Speaker 1: the military. Now he's been in office about ten years,
Speaker 1: and once again the Congressman Warren Davidson, Welcome to the
Speaker 1: Bill Cunningham Show. And Congressman, I'm being told by some
Speaker 1: of my liberal friends that they're in a turmoil and
Speaker 1: you can only imagine what they're feeling like now that
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer stabbed them in the back from their perspective,
Speaker 1: But does it make it easier to pass the omnibus
Speaker 1: spending bill in a few months with the tax cuts
Speaker 1: having already approved, shall we say cr into September thirtieth
Speaker 1: of this year.
Speaker 3: Look, all my left wing friends are in turmoil too,
Speaker 3: They're distraught, and you know, I want to feel bad
Speaker 3: for him, but you know this is what I voted for.
Speaker 3: I mean, my enthusiasm and most of most of the
Speaker 3: constituencies of Ohio's eighth district Southwest Ohio. They're through the moon.
Speaker 3: They're excited about what's going on, and you know, some
Speaker 3: of them have some questions, Hey, you know what's going
Speaker 3: on with the tariffs. President Trump highlighted that, say we're
Speaker 3: going to take care of our farmers. There'll be some impact.
Speaker 3: And the reality is we were suffering from a fatal
Speaker 3: overdos a government on almost every front. So everything's distorted
Speaker 3: from the economy. It's juiced up about like Joe Biden
Speaker 3: at a press conference, and we got to get the
Speaker 3: excess government out and get it back on to free
Speaker 3: market economy. So there'll be some disruption, a little turbulence,
Speaker 3: but I think, you know, we're poised to come in
Speaker 3: for a good safe landing. But yeah, I mean on
Speaker 3: the economy, that's what's going on in there. But you
Speaker 3: look at they didn't accidentally facilitate an invasion of our
Speaker 3: counting of our country, and so they're not gonna sit
Speaker 3: by idly as we try to reverse the invasion. And
Speaker 3: so you literally have them defending Venezuelan gangs. Who are
Speaker 3: you know, flooding the country with people that are killing Americans.
Speaker 3: That's crazy.
Speaker 1: Well, the other I watched you a few days ago
Speaker 1: on CNN being badgered by one of their reporters, and
Speaker 1: some of the morning talk shows had the fact that
Speaker 1: right now President Trump and the Republicans are extremely more
Speaker 1: popular than the Democrats. In fact, some polling has the
Speaker 1: Democrats whether twenty one percent approval rating, CNN's at twenty
Speaker 1: nine percent, the President's like forty five percent, but among
Speaker 1: Republicans he's about seventy percent. And really, you Republicans in
Speaker 1: Congress are much more popular with the American people than
Speaker 1: the Democrats and the Congress, and tariffs play a part
Speaker 1: in that. And can you explain as you own small
Speaker 1: businesses and long term is that we don't live. Of course,
Speaker 1: we live each day at days roll by quickly, the years,
Speaker 1: the year is even more quick. Can you explain the
Speaker 1: benefits of tariffs? Here we are in the middle of March.
Speaker 1: But what are the benefits of tariffs that maybe maybe
Speaker 1: the Democrats and CNN that you're badgered by doesn't see.
Speaker 3: Well, Look, in an ideal world, we would have very
Speaker 3: low to no tariffs at our border, but so would
Speaker 3: everybody else. I mean, I was in manufacturing and you
Speaker 3: talk about Look it worked great for our farmers. We
Speaker 3: were exporting food all over the world, and we still are,
Speaker 3: but American manufacturer has been decimated, and that's where more
Speaker 3: people work. And so you look at our towns hollowed
Speaker 3: out or economy hollowed out. The whole phrase russ belt
Speaker 3: was coined frankly because with the benefit of hindsight, Ross
Speaker 3: Perrot was right, if you do all this stuff, you're
Speaker 3: gonna hear a giant sucking sound of the jobs leaving
Speaker 3: our country. And with the benefit of hindsight, some people
Speaker 3: wouldn't change course. But President Trumps has said, well, he's
Speaker 3: probably right in the beginning, but he's also said, hey,
Speaker 3: we do need to change course. And tell me how
Speaker 3: if you're one of our friends and allies that are
Speaker 3: all distraught, tell me how a reciprocal tariff that just
Speaker 3: puts the same tariff you got on us on you.
Speaker 3: How's that unfair?
Speaker 1: Reciprocity is the key, isn't it? Because I'm told by
Speaker 1: my friends and auto manufacturing it's damn near impossible to
Speaker 1: get a Chevrolet or get Afford into Europe. But it's
Speaker 1: very easy to get a Mercedes, or to get a Volkswagen,
Speaker 1: or get a BMW, or to get a French car.
Speaker 1: They make lows of cars, but the Italians make pretty
Speaker 1: damn good cars like Ferrari. I can't afford one, friends
Speaker 1: of mine have them. Nonetheless, they sell their products here,
Speaker 1: but we can sell our products there. So that's reciprocity.
Speaker 1: With Canada the same thing. There's two million American cars
Speaker 1: made in Canada every year that shipped into the United States,
Speaker 1: and the farmers and those who make lumber have a
Speaker 1: hell of a time getting their products in Canada. But
Speaker 1: because of NAFTA, the walls came tumbling down, the manufacturing jobs.
Speaker 1: There were millions left for Mexico and or Canada. And
Speaker 1: all the President is saying, what's wrong with reciprocity? And
Speaker 1: I think the American people generally get it, But nonetheless
Speaker 1: it's having a negative effect on the stock market. And
Speaker 1: So if you and I have this conversation, Congressman in
Speaker 1: about a year from now, it's going to take some time.
Speaker 1: What will America look like in the year from a
Speaker 1: job perspective, if the tariffs were and the Trump policies work,
Speaker 1: what does America look like in March of twenty twenty six.
Speaker 3: Well, if we do this and we get the tax
Speaker 3: reform right. I mean, one, if Congress doesn't take action
Speaker 3: this year, everybody's going to give big tax increase, so
Speaker 3: that'll be really bad. So if we follow through and
Speaker 3: do what we're supposed to do, we hold taxes low
Speaker 3: for everybody, we get some other reforms back in place
Speaker 3: that kind of expired and went away, you'll see massive
Speaker 3: investment in the United States, and you'll see it simpler.
Speaker 3: I mean, there was investment announced under the Infrastructure Bill
Speaker 3: under Joe Biden. About a third of it was actually
Speaker 3: going to infrastructure, but even that third had all these
Speaker 3: crazy strings attached. And I just got to say, talking
Speaker 3: to some of the guys in the skilled trades, you
Speaker 3: just aren't that many transgender concrete workers out there. And
Speaker 3: to do some of these federal contracts released under Joe Biden,
Speaker 3: you get all these DEI initiatives and everything else. Donald
Speaker 3: Trump is getting that not just the excess spending, but
Speaker 3: the excess government the regulation out of our economy, and
Speaker 3: as that frees up. I mean, I just talked to
Speaker 3: a small manufacturing guy friend of mine. He's got one
Speaker 3: point two million dollars worth of contracts in the past
Speaker 3: month that he wasn't getting. He got him out of
Speaker 3: China and got him out of Canada because the tariffs
Speaker 3: are in place. So those are the stories that the
Speaker 3: media isn't going to highlight. And when that happens, you're
Speaker 3: getting instead of having warehouses and look, I'm glad we
Speaker 3: have them.
Speaker 1: Well while I was.
Speaker 3: Close to everybody, so it's a good place to ship from.
Speaker 3: But warehouse jobs only pay so much. The big giant
Speaker 3: warehouses with a handful of people working through there to
Speaker 3: pull all the goods out of them. The factory jobs,
Speaker 3: the engineering, and the investment like GE's headquarters in Cincinnati,
Speaker 3: that's where you really get the motibles and the big
Speaker 3: high wage jobs.
Speaker 1: And so what this is after a year or two
Speaker 1: or three, is that that nafta, that giant sucking sound
Speaker 1: will be reversed. And these companies like Honda was announced
Speaker 1: a few weeks ago to Honda, which is making a
Speaker 1: hybrid civic, is going to make it now in Indiana
Speaker 1: and not make it in Mexico. And all these companies
Speaker 1: are now saying, Okay, if Trump's going to be in office,
Speaker 1: he's going to be there for the next four years.
Speaker 1: The only way we can institutionalize these market changes is
Speaker 1: to win the presidency again in nineteen and twenty twenty
Speaker 1: eight and twenty thirty two. We can't go back to
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom or Kamala Harris and have these changes take place,
Speaker 1: but that giant sucking sound will be out of Canada
Speaker 1: and Mexico and out of Europe and not here. And
Speaker 1: now a second issue. I want to get on with
Speaker 1: you about these federal judges. You know, I sleep with
Speaker 1: a judge. I've slept with her now for about fifties
Speaker 1: two years. I love sleeping with a judge. I worked
Speaker 1: for judges. I was a federal law clerk, and I
Speaker 1: was an attorney general. I love judges. However, we can
Speaker 1: have eight hundred different federal judges making foreign policy decisions.
Speaker 1: We had one on Saturday that supposedly was going to
Speaker 1: try to turn around a flight of Venezuelan gang members,
Speaker 1: the TDA Gang, and bring them back, but they were
Speaker 1: outside territorial waters. I anticipate that's going to continue to
Speaker 1: drive liberals nuts. But one of your colleagues wants to
Speaker 1: impeach some of these federal judges that want to envelop
Speaker 1: their own, shall we say, foreign policy. I can't imagine
Speaker 1: the president when he bombed the Hooties a day or
Speaker 1: two ago. To go to a federal judge who asked
Speaker 1: permission to launch that when you declare when they declared,
Speaker 1: when the President declared that the TDA gangs out of
Speaker 1: Venezuela or domestic enemies in a sense terrorist, much like
Speaker 1: we don't get permission from a federal judge to bomb Hesbalajamas, Taliban,
Speaker 1: Boca Ram did Trump the other day when he killed
Speaker 1: one of the leaders of ISIS have to go to
Speaker 1: a federal judge get permission to conduct American foreign policy?
Speaker 1: Do you see as a congressman and a ranger and
Speaker 1: someone went to Notre Dame, and someone went to West Point,
Speaker 1: someone that's own businesses. It's a problem when we have
Speaker 1: eight hundred different federal judges enacting tros against the president
Speaker 1: when he's conducting foreign policy.
Speaker 3: Look, this is not just a bad judge, he's a
Speaker 3: crooked judge. This guy's been at the center of a
Speaker 3: lot of anti Trump action. He's, you know, maybe not
Speaker 3: patient zero for Trump de arrangement syndrome, but he's got
Speaker 3: it bad. And this has less to do with the facts.
Speaker 3: And I will say, look, even if Donald Trump wasn't
Speaker 3: there if you had somebody else. It's an ideology. Like
Speaker 3: I say, they didn't just accidentally flood the country with
Speaker 3: the illegals. They did it on purpose. And they didn't
Speaker 3: do it in spite of the implications they did it
Speaker 3: because of them. They It's crazy. And that's why on
Speaker 3: issue after issue, Republicans are doing better than Democrats, because
Speaker 3: I mean, who defends the cartels. I get a bill
Speaker 3: called the Stop that Cartels Act, who's on to defend
Speaker 3: the cartel side? Well, now we know the Democrats are
Speaker 3: this judge is they're defending the cartels. And you know,
Speaker 3: thank goodness for good allies like El Salvador and naab
Speaker 3: Bukele putting these into a high security prison. It's not issus.
Speaker 3: You guys are going to be turned loose. They're going
Speaker 3: to be put into one of the highest security prisons
Speaker 3: in the world. And then you can trust that they're
Speaker 3: going to get a they'll do it cheaper than we would.
Speaker 3: We would do it so proven results in El Salvador.
Speaker 3: And look, these aren't just like your your neighborhood people
Speaker 3: that moved in and you know they had a kid
Speaker 3: and sing out to baby's American and you know they
Speaker 3: want to make all these happy therapy songs. These guys
Speaker 3: are part of criminal cartels, people that the President has
Speaker 3: declared rightly enemies of our country, people that run the
Speaker 3: black markets in our country, flooding our cities with fentanyl,
Speaker 3: killing tens of thousands of Americans every year, and they're
Speaker 3: rightly being treated as enemies of our country. Just like
Speaker 3: you can't have eight hundred judges deciding the foreign policy
Speaker 3: of our country. Frankly, you can't have five hundred and
Speaker 3: thirty five members of Congress negotiating your tariff for having
Speaker 3: foreign policies either. Eventually, this stuff needs to be locked
Speaker 3: into law because just like Donald Trump said when they
Speaker 3: were when when Joe Biden wanted to lock a law
Speaker 3: in last Congress, he wanted to set a floor so
Speaker 3: that like one point eight million people got in no
Speaker 3: matter what. And we see now almost nobody's coming into
Speaker 3: the country illegally because all we really needed was a
Speaker 3: different president. But we do need laws, and there'll be
Speaker 3: a time for that. That's basically what the cr was
Speaker 3: about this past week is give me some runway, let's
Speaker 3: get all this stuff worked out, and then we'll lock
Speaker 3: it in. That's what the year holds.
Speaker 1: Isn't amazing that two years ago the Republicans were put
Speaker 1: through a living hell because we have to change the
Speaker 1: laws relative to immigration. We don't have adequate laws. And
Speaker 1: of course Biden was saying, give me more power, I
Speaker 1: can do it. But that bill that Lansford negotiated one
Speaker 1: Republican with the Democrats would have legalized one point eight
Speaker 1: million per year and institutionalized catch and release. So the
Speaker 1: idea was get the one point eight million or more
Speaker 1: all over the country if flights at a cost of
Speaker 1: billions of dollars. And now it's quite clear the goal
Speaker 1: of Joe Biden or those operating his auto pen was
Speaker 1: to change the electorate in many cities, and that's why
Speaker 1: many came to Ohio, Many came Indiana, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin.
Speaker 1: They were putting them disproportionately in red states so that
Speaker 1: after five or ten years to legalize them, which would
Speaker 1: have happened if if Harris had won the presidency with
Speaker 1: Tim Walltz, all of a sudden, here we go and
Speaker 1: the country would have changed fundamentally. As the President said,
Speaker 1: we didn't need new laws, needed a new president. And
Speaker 1: right now the illegals are down to zero and nol
Speaker 1: Salvador is accepting these so called alien enemies and they're
Speaker 1: going to house them in these terrible prisons. But their
Speaker 1: behavior got them there. They're not Americans, they're here illegally.
Speaker 1: They're involved in human trafficking, drug distribution, and rape, robbery
Speaker 1: and more. All these high end burglaries are being conducted
Speaker 1: by Chilean gangs and Venezuelan gangs. And if the President
Speaker 1: needs to act, I can only imagine if you had
Speaker 1: to go to Judge Chunkin in Washington, d C. Or
Speaker 1: Judge James Boseburg and as permission to bomb somebody, or
Speaker 1: as permission to get an illegal alien out of the
Speaker 1: country and have each one needs to have their own
Speaker 1: hearing and their own trial. We're talking about two hundred
Speaker 1: and thirty six went down on Saturday. Two hundred and
Speaker 1: thirty six members of the TDA gang, the most vicious
Speaker 1: violent gang in South America, was on a plane. And
Speaker 1: can you imagine two hundred and thirty six different trials
Speaker 1: with different witnesses. How do you prove this? It would
Speaker 1: take years, if any, but the president needs to act quickly,
Speaker 1: which is why he has the executive power which is
Speaker 1: what the Congress says. Now, lastly, Congressman Warren Davidson, there's
Speaker 1: an effort by some of your colleagues, including Pam Bondi
Speaker 1: the Attorney General, to declare the activities of liberals and
Speaker 1: leftists to fire bomb Tesla showrooms as some sort of
Speaker 1: active domestic terrorism, which of course it is. It's done
Speaker 1: for political purposes. What is your feeling about what's happening,
Speaker 1: Elon Musk, what's happening in Tesla? And by the way,
Speaker 1: I'm a Chevrolet kind of a guy. But nonetheless, you
Speaker 1: can have large numbers of leftists destroying millions of dollars
Speaker 1: worth of inventory of Tesla for political purposes. Should we
Speaker 1: treat those who are caught as domestic terrorists themselves and
Speaker 1: expedite trial for those who would burn down dealerships because
Speaker 1: they disagree with the owner of some of the stock.
Speaker 3: Well, look, it's one thing when you go I'm going
Speaker 3: to boycott you know, your thing, Nike or something because
Speaker 3: they're supporting Colin Kaepernick. But you know, if you decide
Speaker 3: to stop buying Nike or Tesla, that's a different story
Speaker 3: than you decide to vandalize somebody else's stuff. You know,
Speaker 3: the Tesla vehicles aren't cheap, so there's a very large
Speaker 3: dollar value associated with the vandalism and damage in destruction,
Speaker 3: whether it's on a dealer lot or some private citizens property.
Speaker 3: I mean, odds are good. Until recently, people write a
Speaker 3: center generally weren't buying a lot of Tesla's. It was
Speaker 3: the left of the center of people that thought that
Speaker 3: the climate change was going to the most serious threat
Speaker 3: to the world. I mean, you had the Secretary of
Speaker 3: Defense and Sherman had joint chiefs of Staff saying the
Speaker 3: number one threat to America's national security is climate change. Well,
Speaker 3: now you got all of them going out, Oh, I
Speaker 3: gotta get a Chevy. I can't get I can't drive
Speaker 3: a Tesla. Get me seen this? Well they were full
Speaker 3: of crap when they were saying it in the first place.
Speaker 3: But the biggest thing out of this that strikes me
Speaker 3: is they say, oh, oh, you know, Elon Musk has
Speaker 3: access to our data. He might steal my you know,
Speaker 3: you know, transaction information. This is a guy that's got
Speaker 3: had four hundred some billion dollars, he's only got three
Speaker 3: hundred something. Now, oh, woe was me? This guy burnt
Speaker 3: one hundred million, one hundred billion dollars in total personal
Speaker 3: net worth so far, and that's just so far. So
Speaker 3: he is in it for the right reasons, and the
Speaker 3: guy's impressive. He's getting great results. He's over the target,
Speaker 3: and that's why they're panicking. Frankly, they're trying to use
Speaker 3: extortion on the value of the Tesla shares to try
Speaker 3: to get a long musk to cry mercy.
Speaker 1: It's terrorism in let's face that the American people are
Speaker 1: with those One pole had him up seventy one percent,
Speaker 1: set it's time to cut down the bureaucracy. And another
Speaker 1: poll was mass deportations. Fifty six percent of the American
Speaker 1: people over the weekend in a poll with CNN, fifty
Speaker 1: six percent support mass deportations. So we're dealing with popular
Speaker 1: items except when you appear on CNN. Now now it's
Speaker 1: not so popular. But Congressman, we have to run Warren
Speaker 1: Davidson once again, keep the faith and Congressman, thank you
Speaker 1: for your service and God bless you and God bless America.
Speaker 1: Thank you very much.
Speaker 3: Yeah, always and honor to join you, Willie, God bless
Speaker 3: you and all your listeners.
Speaker 1: God bless you. You wouldn't know it, Thank you, Congressman.
Speaker 1: You would not know it from watching the media. How
Speaker 1: popular the policies of Donald Trump truly are. Let's continue
Speaker 1: if the line becomes available five one, three, seven, four, nine,
Speaker 1: seven thousand, Home of your Red's News Radio, seven hundred WLW.
Speaker 9: The disposition of our group in Milwaukee playing Marquette is
Speaker 9: just fundamentally unacceptable. They they were not ready to play,
Speaker 9: they did not play with great effort. And there's a
Speaker 9: couple guys that, quite frankly, don't deserve to play anymore.
Speaker 1: It's just it's it's it's where it's at. Hello, piet
Speaker 1: I'm broadcasting.
Speaker 4: A rock.
Speaker 1: Here's the big question. Notre Dame is not in the tournament. Voice,
Speaker 1: but Xavier, according to some U see faithful is also
Speaker 1: not in the tournament. Yes, playing play, Yeah they are.
Speaker 1: They are not in the tournament.
Speaker 7: So I didn't hear Cincinnati Bearcats named yesterday, did you
Speaker 7: is in the tournament? Watching that two hour show on CBS,
Speaker 7: I never heard the Bearcats mentioned.
Speaker 1: Notre Dame is in the tournament? Which one the crown,
Speaker 1: the women's tournament, but the women's tournament, the three seeds.
Speaker 1: They may win it. Yeah, they may win a good team.
Speaker 1: If there's a God in heaven, let them win it.
Speaker 1: Do I get? Do you get the brag at the end?
Speaker 3: Women?
Speaker 1: I like it? Damn. Now you're not answering the question.
Speaker 3: What is the question.
Speaker 1: In the tournament part of it? No? Yes, not in
Speaker 1: the tournament? Are they in the sixty four? Yes? You
Speaker 1: know are they in the tournament or no? Segments? Yes,
Speaker 1: because they're in the tournament. Will he?
Speaker 7: Because when they win and beat the Longhorns on Wednesday night,
Speaker 7: they got to play Illinois on Friday in the first
Speaker 7: round of the NCAA tournament.
Speaker 1: But the first round is the first round, but it's
Speaker 1: the first four. So what for the first round? Oh
Speaker 1: don't know why.
Speaker 10: I mean, you could go back and take all the
Speaker 10: conference titles and add that into the NCAA turn one
Speaker 10: hundred and eight teams.
Speaker 1: So you're saying yes or no? Are they in the tournament?
Speaker 1: As we spare? I say, yesterir, okay, thank you, here
Speaker 1: we go. Yes, they're in the tournament. Will he?
Speaker 7: The students report us and proud service of your local
Speaker 7: Tame Star heating and air conditioning dealers. Tame Star quality
Speaker 7: you could feel in northern Kentucky call any weather, heating
Speaker 7: and air at eight five, nine, seven, eight one forty
Speaker 7: eight twenty two.
Speaker 1: Oh, I have some breaking news right here. Yes, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know. The federal judge is all angry at the
Speaker 1: Trumpster for returning for putting in El s Dalvadore, the Venezuealans,
Speaker 1: and so he says five o'clock today there's going to
Speaker 1: be a contempt hearing to lock up Donald Trump for
Speaker 1: court order. We go what I'm thinking, how about this?
Speaker 1: The same federal judge is ordered the astronauts be returned
Speaker 1: to the space station. They didn't receive their due process rights.
Speaker 1: I'm saying, what, this is why they left them up there?
Speaker 10: This is why in the latest CNN pull the Democrat
Speaker 10: Party had a twenty nine percent approval rating, because they're
Speaker 10: against things like finding government waste and transporting Venezuelan gang members.
Speaker 10: Thank you out of the country. Let me just say
Speaker 10: that out loud. It's unbelievable.
Speaker 1: I think my friend Kurt Hartman is representing the astronauts
Speaker 1: because the judge wants them return to the space station.
Speaker 1: They've been there nine months. I'm thinking, well, who in
Speaker 1: the hell's conducting foreign policy? Is it? One of eight
Speaker 1: hundred federal judges or is it Donald Trump?
Speaker 4: Now?
Speaker 1: Are the Marshalls going to arrest Donald Trump? At five
Speaker 1: o'clock on the air with you Roders doing the best?
Speaker 4: Do it?
Speaker 1: Go ahead, They're gonna go to the White House. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that would be the best. Go get them? What get them?
Speaker 1: I'm not.
Speaker 7: Down even more Bengals update brought to you by Good
Speaker 7: Spirits and Party Town thirteen convenient Northern Kentucky locations.
Speaker 1: It is done.
Speaker 7: Two out of three rock Chase four year, one hundred
Speaker 7: and sixty one mil, Higgins one and fifteen mil. They
Speaker 7: also signed or in Berks today in a two year contract,
Speaker 7: that free agent that they got from the Philip, from
Speaker 7: the Phillies, from the Eagles. So now all that and
Speaker 7: they're working hard. They say, on an Hendrickson deal, let's go.
Speaker 7: So they may get all three of them.
Speaker 1: What about the offensive line? Say what about the guards?
Speaker 1: They'll get somebody in there. Draft me. Let me be
Speaker 1: negative here, boy, hold it. This is the first ladies
Speaker 1: and gentlemen hang on. Last year they had Burrow, they
Speaker 1: had number one, they had number five, they had Trey
Speaker 1: and they went nine and eight, didn't in the playoff.
Speaker 1: They're playing the same hand with this game Cards anticipating
Speaker 1: a different results. According to the Sinnings, Rock, do you
Speaker 1: think Rock, I gotta get off to a better start
Speaker 1: now in three? That might help. But that's that. That
Speaker 1: is a staple under this coaching stack.
Speaker 10: They ease into the season and they, you know, the
Speaker 10: philosophy is, let's be ready to go, let's be healthy,
Speaker 10: let's be on the ascension come December.
Speaker 1: But you can't lose like three games right out of
Speaker 1: the red.
Speaker 10: You can't do it. Those are those games in September
Speaker 10: count the same as the ones in the same go.
Speaker 10: I don't think I'm not making am I making any sense?
Speaker 5: No?
Speaker 1: No, not at all, Bengal.
Speaker 7: Let's see college basketball NCAA Tournament update brought to you
Speaker 7: by ACR gun Eyed.
Speaker 1: Pools and Spas. Call today swim this year. Call Frank.
Speaker 7: He's running a special Xavier in Texas in the first
Speaker 7: four of the NCAA Tournament on Wednesday night at ud Arena.
Speaker 7: First the action right here on seven hundred WLW hold
Speaker 7: on West.
Speaker 1: State first four. That implies there's others other than the
Speaker 1: four that are in. That's right. There's two. There's two team,
Speaker 1: that's right.
Speaker 7: They got They got a couple of games tomorrow night
Speaker 7: and then and then UH Xavier is the second game
Speaker 7: on Wednesday night in U d Arena.
Speaker 3: So they're in.
Speaker 1: They're the first for many they're in the tournament. Y
Speaker 1: they're in. Okay.
Speaker 7: Bearcats will play in Las Vegas in the inaugural College
Speaker 7: Basketball Crown Tournament. They're going to go against the Blue
Speaker 7: Demons of DePaul Thursday, April the first, at three pm Eastern.
Speaker 7: Dayton's on the road Wednesday night at Florida Atlantic in
Speaker 7: the first round of the n i T.
Speaker 1: Miami.
Speaker 7: We but the West Virginia West Virginia governor is going
Speaker 7: to take legal action against the double A n C
Speaker 7: DOUA A selection committee for leaving out the Mountaineers in
Speaker 7: this in this tournament. And apparently the n i T
Speaker 7: denied a bid to twenty five and nine Miami University RedHawks.
Speaker 7: They went with ken State, who Miami beat the get
Speaker 7: to the title game against Akron.
Speaker 1: How about that the n i T.
Speaker 4: What what?
Speaker 1: What's the n i T saying we don't want you
Speaker 1: in the tournament? Well, the n i T is the
Speaker 1: National Tournament that saved your one about five years.
Speaker 7: Are they in a tournament. Then we also, Willie, we
Speaker 7: want to say congrats. We got to get these folks
Speaker 7: in Miami Hamilton Harriers. They won the United States Collegiate
Speaker 7: Athletic Association Men's Division two National basketball Championship over the weekend.
Speaker 7: So congrats to Miami Hamilton. Aiken's going to play for
Speaker 7: the boys state title on Friday. Congrats to Purcell Marion.
Speaker 7: Four in a row for d Alexander and the Cavaliers
Speaker 7: win woods. Also Portsmouth won state champs. Miami Oxford. The
Speaker 7: Harriers won a national college tournament. What are the Miami
Speaker 7: Miami Hamilton, Miami Hamilton Harriers there? It's well, you know what,
Speaker 7: you know what happened.
Speaker 4: You know that U C.
Speaker 7: Claremont won it a couple of years ago and we
Speaker 7: had him in. It's the same, It's the same tournament.
Speaker 1: I'm confused. I'm confused, as not like a jed Or
Speaker 1: is not a dog?
Speaker 7: I don't know, don't ask me. Look out, Harrier, not
Speaker 7: a terrier, you idiot? What as Reds are out to
Speaker 7: snap a six game losing streak.
Speaker 11: Already weady starting early here we go against the Guardians
Speaker 11: tonight eight thirty five with the with the rn L
Speaker 11: Carriers inside Pitch Andrew Well debut tonight.
Speaker 1: Uh, let's see what else is going on?
Speaker 7: Oh Rory McElroy beat JJ spawn this morning in that
Speaker 7: turn to win the Players Championship and also Willie. We
Speaker 7: want to say congratulations to Lance McAllister's father. Dick age
Speaker 7: eighty three, recorded his second hole in won today great.
Speaker 7: It took place the Saint James Plantation Erwin Course in Southport,
Speaker 7: North Carolina. Were used a seven hybrid third hole one
Speaker 7: hundred and ten yards par three.
Speaker 10: Bang bang both his hole and ones holes in one
Speaker 10: hole on ones whatever they have come within the last
Speaker 10: year between two and eighty three, he has two hol
Speaker 10: on ones.
Speaker 1: How many do you have? WILLI in my life but
Speaker 1: started when I was fourteen years old playing golf at
Speaker 1: Sharon Woods and Newman, I have a total of one
Speaker 1: hole in one. If I had two holes in one,
Speaker 1: there'd be two holes in one, not one hole in one.
Speaker 1: I don't have multiple holes in one. I have one
Speaker 1: hole in one number one. I use a seven seven iron,
Speaker 1: put it in the jar from one hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: six yards and I have a picture of it. I'll
Speaker 1: send you, Okay, any questions.
Speaker 7: Nothing else we can say you still got the is
Speaker 7: the golf ball on the man toll under the wreath?
Speaker 1: Yes? What about the reath? What about and take it down? No,
Speaker 1: I'm telling Penny, in a two or three more months,
Speaker 1: the wreath will be current and will be okay. I'm
Speaker 1: sending you a picture right now, Rock of me getting
Speaker 1: my ball out of the hole at Kenwood Country Club
Speaker 1: when I got my one hole in one in my life.
Speaker 10: That if you leave the wreath that being along, you
Speaker 10: might as well just keep it up until next Christmas.
Speaker 1: That's my point, because in another two or three months,
Speaker 1: what the hell is time to put one up. I
Speaker 1: thought you're good. I got the picture. Here's the picture.
Speaker 1: I got the picture. You had hair.
Speaker 3: Then you look young, Yeah.
Speaker 1: I look well it was night twenty eighteen. You know
Speaker 1: he got that wreath up like a mini soccer ball.
Speaker 5: What is that?
Speaker 1: But it's a uh, it's a different kind of a ball.
Speaker 1: I played that for a while. Juice juice ball. You
Speaker 1: must be like a judge smil on caddy shack. That
Speaker 1: wasn't fair. I hit the ball too far. You just
Speaker 1: kind of kicked it in. Kicked it in, all right? Rock,
Speaker 1: went's on the big show today is thunder Dame, the
Speaker 1: Notre Dame men's team, not the girls. So they get
Speaker 1: to the Crown to get the n T. Did they
Speaker 1: get to the ab d y? What's the Notre Dame
Speaker 1: men's team doing? You're breaking up?
Speaker 3: I can hear you.
Speaker 10: At three o'clock right out of the game, we have
Speaker 10: Mike Petralia of c l NS Media gonna break it
Speaker 10: all down. The contract, the money, the women, the fame,
Speaker 10: Jamar Chase T. Higgins one five nine together for the
Speaker 10: next four years lata lot of money.
Speaker 1: Give credit to the Bengals management for getting this done.
Speaker 1: The fans won and they got her done. That's right.
Speaker 1: That's exactly the report here that they're paying more for
Speaker 1: those three players than any any team in football is
Speaker 1: playing for any of their three players. Here's the report.
Speaker 1: The Eagles pay their top three players of forty four
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, the Bengals play their top three players forty
Speaker 1: four percent. The Eagles are twenty six percent, and the
Speaker 1: Bengals are playing paying too much money according to this experton, Yes,
Speaker 1: that is accurate, but they don't have another choice.
Speaker 10: This team is not loaded with talent, unfortunately, so you
Speaker 10: got to pay the top talent that is currently on it.
Speaker 10: And you know they waited a little bit with Look,
Speaker 10: we can Monday morning quarterback, that all we want. But
Speaker 10: right now the big three are there. That's win some games.
Speaker 10: Let's protecting. Let's get some offensive linemen, right, get some defense.
Speaker 10: Let's draft Jahad Campbell, the linebacker out of Alabama.
Speaker 1: With the first pick. That's what I would like. That's
Speaker 1: my choice.
Speaker 3: Let's go.
Speaker 1: Well, how about the issue of the Bengals being criticized
Speaker 1: for not signing these three players? Right now they're being
Speaker 1: criticized for signing the three players afternoon in Cincinnati? What
Speaker 1: is it anyway? They can't win, can't win, win the
Speaker 1: same team, but they signed the same guys. Play it
Speaker 1: back again. I say, they easily could have been twelve
Speaker 1: and five instead of nine and eight, all the things
Speaker 1: that might have been. And the Steelers now might get
Speaker 1: Aaron Rodgers. What have you heard about that one. It's
Speaker 1: not happening, though. I would have thought that would have happened.
Speaker 1: To go to Minnesota. Yeah, JJ McCarthy's up there, my
Speaker 1: son's he's never played one down in the NFL. He's
Speaker 1: from Michigan too, and those of us in Ohio. Don't
Speaker 1: like him because of the Michigan connections. Tom Weeman likes
Speaker 1: to give it up. Please, I don't like him. Negative, Okay,
Speaker 1: we'll try not to be all right, sech what else
Speaker 1: going on?
Speaker 7: That's it, Willie. I mean, that's that's about it. Ridge
Speaker 7: tonight and uh March madness is underway with Ted McKay
Speaker 7: tomorrow night.
Speaker 1: Then they'll get it on. It's over. Savior is in
Speaker 1: the tournament, yes, and West Virginia is gonna sue the
Speaker 1: NCAA for not getting in. And the federal judge in
Speaker 1: d C is gonna hold Trump and get in contempted
Speaker 1: five o'clock and tell the marshals to arrest him, and
Speaker 1: those two individuals in the space station will be ordered
Speaker 1: back by the same federal judge. That's all I got
Speaker 1: to tell you.
Speaker 7: You mean he'll come back, and then they got to
Speaker 7: go back again. Correct, They're never going back again.
Speaker 10: Never.
Speaker 1: Never. They may not be able to walk. Go get
Speaker 1: the Venezuelans in El Salvador and tell me how that's
Speaker 1: when did they go? They went up like in June
Speaker 1: of last year.
Speaker 7: Yeah, they were only supposed to stay like what a
Speaker 7: couple of weeks or something. Weren't they now my wife.
Speaker 1: My wife pointed this out, and I want to be
Speaker 1: a conspiracy theorist. Oh boy, but around.
Speaker 10: Christmas they all had Christmas hats on. How did they
Speaker 10: have Christmas hats? Well, they don't expect to be up
Speaker 10: there a couple of weeks. Santa Claus.
Speaker 1: Santa Claus the space station. Why didn't you put them
Speaker 1: in the damn sleigh and fly him back Earth. That's
Speaker 1: what he did.
Speaker 7: He put the sleigh one up the space station, gave
Speaker 7: him presents, and then came back down.
Speaker 10: I answered the question, how do they have Christmas hats?
Speaker 10: But that Christian expected me up there like a week
Speaker 10: and a half.
Speaker 1: Santa Claus, they were there space shuttle anyway, and they
Speaker 1: put them on for Christmas because they were already present
Speaker 1: in the space shuttle. They didn't take them with them.
Speaker 7: Tell Kelly that I think it was Santa Claus. He
Speaker 7: was every he delivered the gifts, even to the space station.
Speaker 7: Rock Yellowstone is back. I watched it on some peacock
Speaker 7: this morning. I love Yellowstone. John Dutton is dead, but
Speaker 7: Rip is going to kick some ass like mister asp.
Speaker 1: How about the girl Beth? How's she doing. She's the best.
Speaker 1: She likes to pick up rich guys in bars and
Speaker 1: lead him when there's nowhere to take him. I love Beth.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure you can marry Beth but the night.
Speaker 1: But what are you talking about?
Speaker 4: I have no idea.
Speaker 1: You better watch that stuff? Something else? Watch that stuff,
Speaker 1: all right?
Speaker 8: Say?
Speaker 1: Get us out of the Student's Report. Xavier marches for glory,
Speaker 1: And as Moe said two hours ago, VCU was in
Speaker 1: the playing game, went all the way to the final
Speaker 1: final four Xaviers on the march, It'll be Texas and
Speaker 1: then Eleanor. After that it'll be Duke and then Tennessee,
Speaker 1: then Florida. Xavir remarch for glory. All on the Big
Speaker 1: One segment, Get us out of the Studge Report.
Speaker 7: Willie and Otter of Happy Saint Patrick's Day, We leave
Speaker 7: you with the immortal words of the stud Report.
Speaker 1: At some point, this foolishness has got to stop. Thank You,
Speaker 1: Thank your Governor, Thank your Governor, gets some green skyline Today,
Speaker 1: Rocky thank You Segment, Thank You News, then the Rock
Speaker 1: and Eddie All on news Radio seven hundred WULW