Speaker 1: Remind you that the subject inside wasn't able to be
Speaker 1: removed for a very long period of time because he
Speaker 1: was burnt beyond recognition. And so as we continue to
Speaker 1: move through this, I'm going to talk a little bit
Speaker 1: about his identity and what we believe, but I would
Speaker 1: like to highlight a couple of things that the teams
Speaker 1: found inside of the cyber truck that are useful to
Speaker 1: the investigation, and that first and foremost is a military identification.
Speaker 1: We also found a passport. We found a Desert Eagle
Speaker 1: fifty caliber semi automatic pistol, and if you'll notice on
Speaker 1: a lot of these guns that we're going to talk
Speaker 1: about here, they're almost just burnt beyond recognition. As well,
Speaker 1: there's an SLAR model B thirty semi automatic firearm, number
Speaker 1: of fireworks that were still in the vehicle that had
Speaker 1: to be removed. Notably, we found an iPhone and a
Speaker 1: smart watch, and then several credit cards were also in
Speaker 1: the name of our subject.
Speaker 2: Happy New you man, What a day. So we started
Speaker 2: off the new year with a litany of attacks on
Speaker 2: our homeland, and it appears, I mean, the story that
Speaker 2: we're being told is that these are lone wolves that
Speaker 2: are behaving in terroristic fashions. Look, I'm gonna I'm gonna
Speaker 2: preface this entire episode. I've spent the past, you know,
Speaker 2: every waking minute trying to figure out what I think happened,
Speaker 2: and I'm gonna tell you that. But I'm going to
Speaker 2: preface this with a lot of this is preliminary. I
Speaker 2: mean all of it's preliminary. It's only been a day,
Speaker 2: and I held off as long as I could before
Speaker 2: I give you kind of my initial assessment. But I
Speaker 2: just want to be very clear that I can't say
Speaker 2: much definitively at this junction because so much of this
Speaker 2: is early reporting.
Speaker 3: It's all early reporting, and we.
Speaker 2: Don't know what will change, and we ultimately don't know
Speaker 2: what investigations will one be done and what will you
Speaker 2: know turn up as a consequence of that. So just
Speaker 2: take all of this with a grain of salt. But
Speaker 2: I have a ton of information for you to process
Speaker 2: and for you to consider for yourself, and it come
Speaker 2: to your own conclusion as to what you think is
Speaker 2: most likely as to what transpired. So there was four
Speaker 2: different major events yesterday. The first one happened in the
Speaker 2: early hours of January. First, I believe it was somewhere
Speaker 2: around four am. A man in a electric truck, a
Speaker 2: lightning Ford Lightning electric truck. His name was amsud Din Jabbar.
Speaker 2: He's a United States military veteran and he served. He
Speaker 2: was stationed out of Fort Bragg about a decade ago,
Speaker 2: allegedly at the same location as the attacker in Las Vegas.
Speaker 2: There was fourteen people killed, and what transpired with that
Speaker 2: attack was that he apparently there was multiple IEDs that
Speaker 2: were located at different different spots throughout the city. I've
Speaker 2: been to New Orleans, I think only once, maybe twice,
Speaker 2: and it is a soft target to put it mildly.
Speaker 2: I mean, Bourbon Street is just a bunch of bars
Speaker 2: and drunk people and that's it. And it's large, like
Speaker 2: the streets are essentially shut down at night when the
Speaker 2: people are out parting, and they have barricades or they
Speaker 2: had hydraulic barricades that permitted or did not permit vehicles
Speaker 2: to transit these roads at the peak party time. But
Speaker 2: apparently those barricades were removed and they were going to
Speaker 2: be replaced bad timing, so there was no barricades in place. However,
Speaker 2: there was still police vehicles there and mister Jabbar, assuming
Speaker 2: it's him, navigates around the cop car, goes up on
Speaker 2: the sidewalk and then guns it, wiping out dozens of people.
Speaker 2: And as of now, there's fourteen casualties or fatalities. It's
Speaker 2: absolutely tragic. All of my theorize about this. I do
Speaker 2: not want to dismiss the pain and suffering of them
Speaker 2: and their families, and you know, I mean, it's absolutely atrocious.
Speaker 2: But I think that that's what really drives me in
Speaker 2: the pursuit of truth, though, is that I want to
Speaker 2: get them justice as much as I want to also
Speaker 2: keep me and my family safe from whatever the hell
Speaker 2: is happening. So keep in mind, yes, thoughts and prayers,
Speaker 2: all this is not to diminish what happened to them
Speaker 2: at all, but we need to understand what actually happened,
Speaker 2: as I think that's what we're all most interested in,
Speaker 2: right If we're going to get justice for these people,
Speaker 2: we have to know the truth. That's what I'm in
Speaker 2: pursuit of and that's what I'll always be trying to
Speaker 2: tell you guys.
Speaker 3: Here we go.
Speaker 2: This is Senator John Kennedy. He's a Republican out of
Speaker 2: Louisiana and he had some very interesting commentary that I
Speaker 2: want to break down.
Speaker 4: The federal government is now in charge of this investigation.
Speaker 4: By that, I meaning the White Ash, the FBI as
Speaker 4: a Department of Homeland Security in the Department of Justice.
Speaker 4: And I talked to the FBI. Maybe they've talked to
Speaker 4: my staff, I don't know. I did talk to the
Speaker 4: Secretary of the Security a little while ago, and I
Speaker 4: told him that with all the respect I could muster,
Speaker 4: that we expect to put the full force and the
Speaker 4: resources of the federal government behind this investigat. Our state troopers,
Speaker 4: our local police departments, our sheriffs for good ministare here
Speaker 4: today have been terrific so for federal government's cooperating with them.
Speaker 4: I hope that will continue. Here's what I want to
Speaker 4: ask from the federal government. Cats these people, catches people,
Speaker 4: and then tell the American people the truth. Now, I
Speaker 4: don't want you to tell us yet anything that's going
Speaker 4: to interfere with your investigation. And there are things that
Speaker 4: I've been told that I think are true that I'm
Speaker 4: not sharing with you today because it could interfere with
Speaker 4: their investigation. But after we get to the bottom of this,
Speaker 4: they need to tell the American people the truth, and
Speaker 4: the people knew work is the truth, and the people
Speaker 4: of Americans the truth. I think the mayor and the
Speaker 4: governor are very wise to postpone this ballgames for twenty
Speaker 4: four hours. There's just too much stuff we don't know,
Speaker 4: and it's.
Speaker 5: Just not worth it.
Speaker 4: But just my final point is, I will promise you this.
Speaker 4: I will win. It is appropriate, and this investigation is complete,
Speaker 4: you will find out what happened and who was responsible,
Speaker 4: or I will raise fresh hell and I will chase
Speaker 4: those in the federal government who are responsible for telling
Speaker 4: us what happened, like they stole Christmas.
Speaker 2: So what I found interesting about that is that it
Speaker 2: seemed as if Senator Kennedy does not believe that the
Speaker 2: federal government can be trusted to tell us the truth.
Speaker 2: That's a pretty damning admission in its own right. It
Speaker 2: also leads me to believe that he thinks that they
Speaker 2: may attempt to cover up the truth. Why they would
Speaker 2: do that, It could be a multitude of reasons. I
Speaker 2: think that the one that I think he was hinting
Speaker 2: at is that if it is terrorism of the Muslim variety,
Speaker 2: that the federal government may not want to talk about
Speaker 2: that because of DEI woke nonsense. Maybe that's what he's saying,
Speaker 2: and that's probably the most benign explanation. The more malicious
Speaker 2: explanation would be that he thinks that the federal government
Speaker 2: was involved and therefore they won't tell the truth. I'm
Speaker 2: not sure what she was hinting at. He said as
Speaker 2: if he said quite explicitly that he knows things that
Speaker 2: he's not going to tell us right now, so we
Speaker 2: are left in the dark, unfortunately. But what I find
Speaker 2: fascinating about it is that we have a sitting senator
Speaker 2: of significant tenure who's saying he does not trust DHS
Speaker 2: or the FBI to actually investigate this thing properly. Like
Speaker 2: he's saying it explicitly. He's saying, Oh, they're cooperating with
Speaker 2: us now, I hope that continues.
Speaker 3: We'll see.
Speaker 2: If they don't tell you the truth, I'm gonna raise
Speaker 2: Holy Hell ruin Christmas or whatever weird little saying he
Speaker 2: had there. So, yeah, it's not just you and I
Speaker 2: that are skeptical of the three letter agencies in their
Speaker 2: capacity to handle these investigations. We have sitting senators, ones
Speaker 2: that preside over that state, New Orleans or Louisiana that
Speaker 2: are also highly dubious of the FBI's capacity to do
Speaker 2: their job appropriately. So felt like that was an interesting,
Speaker 2: insightful clip. Let's get to the next one.
Speaker 6: Was anything missed with this particular individual? Was he radicalizing
Speaker 6: online in a way that should have been caught and
Speaker 6: that's yet.
Speaker 3: To be seen.
Speaker 7: Yeah, the authorities, the FBI is so they don't believe
Speaker 7: that this man was solely responsible. That shamp Saidingjabbar may
Speaker 7: have been working with a range of suspects and they
Speaker 7: weren't ruling anything out. So that leaves, I mean, that
Speaker 7: leaves a pretty wide range of possibilities as to what
Speaker 7: exactly they're looking at, who they're looking for, and what
Speaker 7: the public can do to help.
Speaker 6: Well, what the public can do to help is is
Speaker 6: video upload video to the FBI site, because you know,
Speaker 6: I'm hearing reporting that they do have some video of
Speaker 6: other people placing other IEDs in that area, several men
Speaker 6: and a woman. And so clearly this is a cell
Speaker 6: and it's not the type that was mentioned earlier, one
Speaker 6: guy radicalizing himself online. This guy seems to have been
Speaker 6: part of a sell of other people involved and now
Speaker 6: it turns into something like we had at the Boston
Speaker 6: Marathon bombing. We have video of people placing the ied
Speaker 6: in the crowd and then getting away. So now we
Speaker 6: do have a man on as we did in the
Speaker 6: Boston marathon bombing. We're looking for these other people that
Speaker 6: laid those IEDs and other places in the French Quarter
Speaker 6: and the Long Bourbon Street. So I'm sure they're analyzing
Speaker 6: that video and hopefully we'll be seeing those images very
Speaker 6: soon and will kind of maybe hopefully no and identify
Speaker 6: who we're looking for. But I believe there's at least
Speaker 6: three or four other people, if not more, involved in
Speaker 6: this particular event.
Speaker 2: This is a good example of why I held off
Speaker 2: twenty four hours before doing an episode on it. That
Speaker 2: report obviously set off a firestorm that well, we've got
Speaker 2: al kaita isis sleeper cells within the homeland and they're
Speaker 2: carrying out coordinated attacks using vehicles and suicide you know,
Speaker 2: gunmen and also IEDs. And this guy says, I think
Speaker 2: that there's four to five people. Well, the latest update,
Speaker 2: assuming this is accurate, who knows is that those people
Speaker 2: were actually not involved in that That was bad reporting initially.
Speaker 2: So there's also you could say that that's part of
Speaker 2: a cover up, because that's what happened with OKC. There
Speaker 2: was I think it was John Doe two or whatever
Speaker 2: that suddenly became persona non grata. Maybe that's what we're
Speaker 2: seeing here. Maybe it's not. Maybe that in fact, the
Speaker 2: initial reporting was wrong and that mister didn Jabbar did
Speaker 2: act alone. I don't know, but I think that this
Speaker 2: is just to show you that I'm trying to trying
Speaker 2: to be fair with this. I'm trying to actually allow
Speaker 2: a little bit of time to see what the hell
Speaker 2: is actually going on here before I tell you what
Speaker 2: I think. So let's continue with this story. I think
Speaker 2: it gets far more interesting once we get into the
Speaker 2: Vegas attack because it is utterly bizarre, like like jaw
Speaker 2: droppingly not real to me, just to put it bluntly.
Speaker 2: But I'll show you why I think that, and then
Speaker 2: I'll let you think for yourself.
Speaker 1: How many people, how many how many fighters do you
Speaker 1: think we can expect an each attack?
Speaker 8: Well, the thousand is all of them, so we're calling
Speaker 8: it is an I'll kind of plan attack. But within
Speaker 8: those thousands here, some of them are Isis because they
Speaker 8: want Isis to be blamed. I think the more of
Speaker 8: the types they're going to be, isis because then if
Speaker 8: they're caught you, then they talk My sister that I
Speaker 8: think of more of the suicide bombers are going to
Speaker 8: be Al Kaida.
Speaker 1: I think these attacks will happen simultaneously throughout the United
Speaker 1: States or will they be one day here, next day here,
Speaker 1: another one over here next week.
Speaker 8: So they want them coordinated. I don't know coordinated means
Speaker 8: all the same time, or if coordinated means we do
Speaker 8: it Monday, we do it, Tuesday we do it, Wednesday
Speaker 8: we do it, Thursday, we do it Friday. It's just
Speaker 8: too five straight days, I said, But they want to coordinated.
Speaker 2: I'm going to continue that clip in a second, but
Speaker 2: I want to interject. Sarah Adams is basically an open
Speaker 2: source data analyst when it comes to potential terrorism threats,
Speaker 2: and she was on with Sean Ryan. I watched the
Speaker 2: episode a month ago. I don't know if the interview
Speaker 2: was two months ago. It's fascinating. I highly recommend everybody
Speaker 2: check it out. But what she's claiming here in this
Speaker 2: interview honestly sent a chill down my spine. She's saying
Speaker 2: that there's a thousand a thousand already here that are
Speaker 2: either al Qaeda or ISIS, and that they are working together. Now,
Speaker 2: it's a pretty bold claim. I don't I can't say
Speaker 2: definitively that she's correct. However, after yesterday, I'm now giving
Speaker 2: it far more credence. Obviously, you'd be kind of foolish
Speaker 2: not to. But what I found interesting too is that
Speaker 2: what she's saying is unique about this is that what
Speaker 2: we haven't seen in America is this suicide you know,
Speaker 2: vehicular suicide or just suicide attacks from terrorists in America
Speaker 2: in a very long time. If you say nine to eleven,
Speaker 2: was that okay? But we don't have many examples of
Speaker 2: guys like you've seen it throughout the Middle East, even
Speaker 2: in Africa. There's been many examples in India, to and
Speaker 2: Pakistan where you've had these you know, radical islamisists that
Speaker 2: go in and their mission is to take as many
Speaker 2: lives as possible and then they unlive themselves and that's
Speaker 2: how the fight ends. It doesn't end until they end somehow.
Speaker 2: That appears to be what's happening as of yesterday. Now,
Speaker 2: there's a lot of reasons as to why I'm skeptical
Speaker 2: as to if that's actually what we're seeing, and I'll
Speaker 2: get into that in a minute, but just giving her
Speaker 2: her due, it doesn't appear on its face as if
Speaker 2: she called it that. What we saw yesterday was mister
Speaker 2: Dnjibar drives his vehicle and there's footage of it. You
Speaker 2: can find it online. I can't play it for you
Speaker 2: because I don't know if it would get pulled down.
Speaker 2: But he drives his vehicle, takes out dozens of people.
Speaker 2: He then is stopped, he gets out or you know,
Speaker 2: it crashes. He gets out of the vehicle and starts shooting,
Speaker 2: and it looks like Local PD is responsible for taking
Speaker 2: him down. But he had body armor. I think he
Speaker 2: had an Air fifteen. It may have been an AK
Speaker 2: style rifle. I'm not sure which. And he after taking
Speaker 2: all of these lives and causing all of this kato,
Speaker 2: he's then getting out to take more lives and basically
Speaker 2: going down in a blaze of unglory, if you will.
Speaker 2: So that's what happened in New Orleans. In Las Vegas,
Speaker 2: this guy takes a cyber truck and this is I'm
Speaker 2: going to get into the details of this story. As
Speaker 2: I said earlier, it's just crazy, bizarre unalives himself just
Speaker 2: before igniting what amounts to a firework bomb, incendiary bomb.
Speaker 3: It's garbage.
Speaker 2: It's not a device that is going to create a
Speaker 2: mass casualty event, which does not align with what Miss
Speaker 2: Adams is saying here. So that's why I'm so skeptical
Speaker 2: of it. Also, it is a Trump supporting Elon fan
Speaker 2: that's allegedly responsible for this. He's also a Special Forces
Speaker 2: guy and a twenty year military veteran with a newborn
Speaker 2: at home. Okay, I'll leave that there for now, but
Speaker 2: you can see why these two attacks are different. However,
Speaker 2: they were both stationed at Fort Bragg ten twelve years
Speaker 2: ago at the same time. Now we don't know at
Speaker 2: this point if they knew each other, but that adds
Speaker 2: to the bizarre nature of all this. What also kind
Speaker 2: of conflicts with what she says versus what we saw
Speaker 2: yesterday is that she's saying that these are going to
Speaker 2: be a Kaeda or Isis fighters. These are American military veterans,
Speaker 2: and I feel like this is that's the aspect of
Speaker 2: this story that has been slept on the most that
Speaker 2: everyone's just going like, well, you know, Iran or Muslims
Speaker 2: or you know, Islamic terrorism. That's that's what we're dealing with.
Speaker 2: And maybe they're right, but these are these are heinous
Speaker 2: acts that are being committed by US citizens, US military veterans.
Speaker 2: No less, that is very concerning, and it instantly made
Speaker 2: me start to dig deeper to say, Okay, is this
Speaker 2: in fact just US military veterans that were radicalized online?
Speaker 3: Is it that simple? Could it be?
Speaker 2: Mk Ultra? I know it sounds crazy. I'm not going there.
Speaker 2: I'm just saying, could it be? I don't know, is
Speaker 2: this Gladio?
Speaker 3: Is this? Uh?
Speaker 2: I mean, there's there's lots of different uh you know,
Speaker 2: CIA projects that that could lead down this path. So
Speaker 2: I don't know. I don't know, but I think that's
Speaker 2: what That's what people are not talking enough about that
Speaker 2: even if you assume that these guys were radicalized, well,
Speaker 2: these are US military veterans, both of which, from what
Speaker 2: I've read, served in Afghanistan. So uh yeah, that that's
Speaker 2: a cause for much bigger concern than what we thought initially,
Speaker 2: because this is not just oh, we shut down the
Speaker 2: border and we deport all of these Muslim extremists. No,
Speaker 2: these are these are American citizens. So this is a
Speaker 2: much more complicated issue, and that's why I thought doing
Speaker 2: an entire episode on it was justified.
Speaker 5: What kind of places do you think they're going to target?
Speaker 5: So this is what's complicated.
Speaker 8: So all Kainda's preferences, you can imagine is symbols of
Speaker 8: the US or anything that causes economic damage.
Speaker 5: Right, capital is a great symbol.
Speaker 8: I feel like bridges or any kind of public transportation
Speaker 8: always matters because it puts costs against US and it
Speaker 8: causes fear. But here's where it gets complicated. So remember
Speaker 8: the terraces might have their goal is they're going to
Speaker 8: attack the Metro in DC, right, But remember some of
Speaker 8: these tears are going to be ISIS.
Speaker 5: And remember they can change locations.
Speaker 8: The ISIS guy might go down the Metro and say,
Speaker 8: I don't there's not many people down here. I'll kill twenty,
Speaker 8: but there's an event going on, I'm going to go
Speaker 8: up there, right, Because ISIS is a little different. ISIS
Speaker 8: just wants mass casualty. I pinion terrace in general. Just
Speaker 8: leaving Afghanistan, a lot of them are coming up through
Speaker 8: the Darien Gap to the border, and that was there
Speaker 8: was a big push right getting in the US y
Speaker 8: you can now not all those al Qaeda's attackers, right,
Speaker 8: but they came in with fake Afghan passports. They came
Speaker 8: in with fake Syrian passports, fake Turkish passports. Those are
Speaker 8: the kind of the three preferences because they're easiest to get.
Speaker 8: And then you know if our border patrol agents a
Speaker 8: lot of them haven't been overseas, right, if an Egyptian
Speaker 8: shows up the border with Assyrian passport, is he gonna
Speaker 8: know that person?
Speaker 2: So what I thought was interesting about that clip is
Speaker 2: that you have these two different end goals. The ISIS fighter,
Speaker 2: as she said, would be more interested in just getting
Speaker 2: the highest body count possible, whereas the al Qaeda fire
Speaker 2: fighter is more interested in symbolism or the symbology of
Speaker 2: the attack or the target of the attack. As evidence
Speaker 2: on nine to eleven, you go after the two largest
Speaker 2: towers in the capital of our most bustling city of
Speaker 2: New York. This is a different styles. So that's why
Speaker 2: the ISIS style attack in New Orleans is in alignment
Speaker 2: with what she's saying there, because this guy goes in there,
Speaker 2: he's trying to take out as many people as possible
Speaker 2: with the vehicle. He's got these IDs that are set
Speaker 2: up all over the place allegedly that don't detonate. He
Speaker 2: then I don't know if he panics or what, but
Speaker 2: he immediately drives up on the curb and barrels down
Speaker 2: this street, taking out as many people as possible, gets
Speaker 2: out with his gun, start shooting people as fast as possible.
Speaker 2: That's ISIS style. That is like clearly what she's saying there,
Speaker 2: That is ISIS style. We also have initial reports that
Speaker 2: there's this black flag in the truck bed. I don't
Speaker 2: know definitively that it was an ISIS flag, but that's
Speaker 2: what some of the reporting had been. I've also seen
Speaker 2: other reports saying that's wrong and that the flag was
Speaker 2: upside down, which would be totally bizarre if so, but
Speaker 2: that's the claim, So take that part with a grain
Speaker 2: of salt. However, I do think it's fair to say
Speaker 2: that that attack in New Orleans is ISIS styled. That
Speaker 2: does not mean that, in fact, it's an ISIS terrist
Speaker 2: that did it, but it does mean that that's in
Speaker 2: alignment with what she was warning about. The Vegas attack
Speaker 2: is different. It's extraordinarily symbolic. You have a cyber truck elon,
Speaker 2: you have a Trump hotel in Las Vegas, the incoming president.
Speaker 2: You have the fact that Elon is largely responsible for
Speaker 2: assisting Donald Trump and winning the presidency. You also have
Speaker 2: the fact that Donald Trump is perceived to be I
Speaker 2: hope in opposition to continue in the war in Ukraine.
Speaker 2: You then have the fact that the Vegas attacker, assuming
Speaker 2: it's in fact him, is seen in a T shirt
Speaker 2: that is basically, I'll show you it in a second,
Speaker 2: is a Slava Ukrainia type of shirt. Could that be
Speaker 2: his motivation that We're going to stop funding Ukraine in
Speaker 2: their fight against Russia, and therefore he wanted to have
Speaker 2: a very symbolic attack. But that wasn't very lethal. Okay, maybe,
Speaker 2: I mean it seems like a bizarre way to do it,
Speaker 2: but just on its face though, super super symbolic. So
Speaker 2: that would be more in alignment with the al Qaeda
Speaker 2: soylid attack. So we have recording to what she said
Speaker 2: it was going to be Isis styled and al Qaeda style. Well,
Speaker 2: on its face, you can make a pretty strong claim
Speaker 2: that what we saw yesterday was an Isi style attack
Speaker 2: immediately followed by an al Qaida style attack.
Speaker 9: Let's keep going, good evening, I'm Shampster Dangerbor, property manager
Speaker 9: with Blue Metal Properties and team lead at the Midas
Speaker 9: Group at Core Realty. I just want to say hello
Speaker 9: and let you know a little bit about me. So
Speaker 9: I'm born and raised in Beaumont, Texas and now live
Speaker 9: in Houston, and I've been here all my life, with
Speaker 9: the exception of traveling for the military, where I spent
Speaker 9: ten years as a human resources specialist and IT specialist,
Speaker 9: where I learned the meaning of great service and what
Speaker 9: it means to be responsive and take everything seriously, dotting
Speaker 9: i's and crossing t's to make sure that things go
Speaker 9: off without a hitch. So I've taken those skills and
Speaker 9: applied them to my career as a real estate agent,
Speaker 9: where I feel like what really sets me apart from
Speaker 9: other agents is my ability to be able to one
Speaker 9: be a fierce negotiator. So not only do I brilliantly
Speaker 9: market your property to make sure it gets sold as
Speaker 9: quickly as possible or it gets leased as quickly as possible,
Speaker 9: but I'm also going to take every ounce of energy
Speaker 9: and putting it into negotiating for you and for your
Speaker 9: property to get the best deal that you can possibly
Speaker 9: get for So that's mister Gingerbar.
Speaker 2: That's allegedly the guy who's responsible for the truck Attech
Speaker 2: in New Orleans yesterday morning, early early hours yesterday morning.
Speaker 2: Born and raised Texas. He has a Texas accent. Like,
Speaker 2: I'm not saying he couldn't have been some radical Muslim
Speaker 2: ISIS extremists. Maybe he was. You watch that interview and
Speaker 2: it's hard to believe in it. I mean, other than
Speaker 2: his name, you wouldn't. You wouldn't if you just listened
Speaker 2: to him, if you didn't watch that video, Like if
Speaker 2: the audio listeners are just listening right now, he wouldn't
Speaker 2: be like, Yeah, that's definitely an ISIS fighter, like right, again,
Speaker 2: not saying he couldn't be, but I'm just saying instinct,
Speaker 2: gut reaction.
Speaker 3: I don't know. Now.
Speaker 2: He did say that he spent ten years abroad in
Speaker 2: the military. Who knows he could have committed or seen
Speaker 2: atrocious acts against Muslims and came back and became you know, radical,
Speaker 2: It's possible, but yeah, born and raised Texas guy.
Speaker 3: That seems like a stretch. Now.
Speaker 2: There are additional reports that he had a restraining order
Speaker 2: against him because of I guess spousal abuse with his wife,
Speaker 2: also financial issues he was dealing with. Okay, you know,
Speaker 2: maybe maybe that could all feed into this. I don't know,
Speaker 2: but I just wanted you to hear from him. What
Speaker 2: do you think him? What does that make you feel?
Speaker 2: Does that strike you as a guy who would become
Speaker 2: an ISIS terrorist that would strike in New Orleans?
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 2: I don't know, obviously, I don't. But that's allegedly the
Speaker 2: guy who did it, and allegedly it was ISIS inspired,
Speaker 2: according to the President of the United States. Let's hear what
Speaker 2: he had to say.
Speaker 10: If you are also reported to me, the mere hours
Speaker 10: before the attack, he posted videos on social media indicating
Speaker 10: that is inspired by ISIS expressly desire to kill, desire
Speaker 10: to kill. The ISIS flag was found in his vehicle,
Speaker 10: which he rented to conduct this attack.
Speaker 2: So we have the President of the United States acknowledging
Speaker 2: the ISIS flag.
Speaker 3: Again.
Speaker 2: I've seen conflicting reports on that, so I can't say definitively.
Speaker 2: I also have not seen the videos that are allegedly
Speaker 2: posted to social media where he says that he has
Speaker 2: this desire to kill and all this other stuff. Given
Speaker 2: how much I've been online for the.
Speaker 3: Past twenty four hours.
Speaker 2: I'm shocked if those videos are in fact true or real,
Speaker 2: because they have not. They haven't found their way across
Speaker 2: my timeline, and I've been searching for the latest over
Speaker 2: and over again. So that seems questionable. I'll just give
Speaker 2: it questionable because maybe it's happened and I haven't seen it.
Speaker 2: If you have seen it, please drop it into the
Speaker 2: comments below. I would love to see what this guy
Speaker 2: had to say to contrast that versus this real estate agent,
Speaker 2: US military veteran born in Texas guy versus Hey, I'm
Speaker 2: about to go commit a heinous act of terrorism. If
Speaker 2: that video exists, I would love to see it, genuinely.
Speaker 2: I think that would answer a lot as to know
Speaker 2: his character arc and to whether or not this is
Speaker 2: actually the driving factor behind what he ended up doing.
Speaker 2: I have to believe that it was in fact him
Speaker 2: that was responsible for that attack, because he's deceased. They
Speaker 2: have his body like, so I have to assume it's him,
Speaker 2: But it's just the inspiration behind it. Seen bizarre to
Speaker 2: me at this point. Let's keep going.
Speaker 1: You can see the cyber truck highlighted there. For extensive
Speaker 1: surveillance video, we were able to track him leaving there,
Speaker 1: and we know that he went to several different places
Speaker 1: along Las Vegas Boulevard, and he spent some time in
Speaker 1: a parking lot of a business near Flamingo and Las
Speaker 1: Vegas Boulevard. And we didn't have a video of the
Speaker 1: truck pulling back onto Las Vegas Boulevard from the Sands.
Speaker 5: See that there.
Speaker 1: Goes that's north on the boulevard from Sands at eight
Speaker 1: thirty nine, where he then immediately heads to the Trump Hotel,
Speaker 1: pulls into the valet area and as of course you
Speaker 1: all know, the explosion occurs within seventeen seconds of his
Speaker 1: arrival at the valets.
Speaker 2: So what's interesting about this is that this source is
Speaker 2: The Independent, posted by Colin Rugged says family of accused
Speaker 2: Trump Hotel truck bomber Matthew Livelsberger says he was a
Speaker 2: quote big Trump supporter and quote questions the incident odd.
Speaker 2: The uncle of Lovell's that's a tongue twister. The uncle
Speaker 2: of Livelsburger told The Independent that he is confused by
Speaker 2: the explosion because his nephew could rig a bomb to
Speaker 2: blow up half the hotel if he really wanted to
Speaker 2: do damage. He used to have all patriotic stuff on Facebook.
Speaker 2: He was one hundred percent loving the country. He loved Trump,
Speaker 2: and he was always a very very patriotic soldier, a
Speaker 2: patriotic American. It's one of the reasons he was in
Speaker 2: Special Forces for so many years. It wasn't just one
Speaker 2: tour of duty. That was a very skilled warrior, and
Speaker 2: he would be able to make it. If it was
Speaker 2: him and he did this, he would have been able
Speaker 2: to make a more sophisticated explosion than using propane tanks
Speaker 2: and camping fuel. Some of it doesn't make sense when
Speaker 2: he had the skills and ability to make something more
Speaker 2: let's say efficient. His skills were enormous from what he
Speaker 2: had been taught in the military. He could have fashioned
Speaker 2: a bomb that would have obliterated half of the hotel
Speaker 2: if he seriously wanted to hurt others. Twenty years, he's
Speaker 2: Special Forces, he's been deployed, he's seen that.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 2: We're going to go into his resume in a second,
Speaker 2: which was just updated two months ago, which puts all
Speaker 2: the more red flags.
Speaker 3: On the table.
Speaker 2: So I did these Twitter spaces yesterday, spent a lot
Speaker 2: of time on them because I was really trying to
Speaker 2: figure out what the hell happen, and I happened to
Speaker 2: be on the panel with this gentleman named Matt Tardio.
Speaker 2: Matt Tardio is a podcast host, a keynote speaker, a
Speaker 2: veteran father, husband. All right, so he's a veteran, but
Speaker 2: this is what he had to say about it. Wait
Speaker 2: before assuming guilt. Matthew Liwlsberger is a suspect in the Tesla,
Speaker 2: Vegas bombing at the Trump Hotel. Twice last month, someone
Speaker 2: pretending to be a Green Beret from my former Operation
Speaker 2: Detachment Alpha ODIA sister team contacted me and showed extensive
Speaker 2: knowledge of personal information about the Green Beret they claimed
Speaker 2: to be, who is still on active duty. The person
Speaker 2: who contacted me claimed to be suicidal, likely to attempt
Speaker 2: to get me to swat his house with either police
Speaker 2: or Green Berets to make sure he was okay. This
Speaker 2: would have given away his location if it was not
Speaker 2: already known. Matt Libelsberger served on the same ODA and
Speaker 2: held the same position as the person who was impersonated.
Speaker 2: A lot is not adding up about the situation in Vegas.
Speaker 2: If a delta can't keep someone alive, then the delta
Speaker 2: shouldn't be alive. Go spend time with your wife and kids.
Speaker 2: Please love you, Bud. Okay not Aaron Toby, come on bro,
Speaker 2: So no neither. So this guy is like he's getting
Speaker 2: reached out to, basically being catfished as to who this
Speaker 2: person is, and he claims that they weren't. He told
Speaker 2: his story on the spaces I was on and I
Speaker 2: was totally blown away by it. So he thinks that
Speaker 2: there's some sort of operation being ran. And this guy
Speaker 2: was like not into the false flag thesis when I
Speaker 2: first talked to him, like hours after the New Orleans attack,
Speaker 2: but after the Vegas attack he sounded much more like me.
Speaker 2: So take that for what it's worth. But he does not.
Speaker 2: He does not buy it at all on its face.
Speaker 2: He thinks this is totally bizarre, and I think it's
Speaker 2: worth considering his opinion. If you own gold, you've probably
Speaker 2: been happy to see prices hitting new all time highs
Speaker 2: this year. But your gold can do more than just
Speaker 2: sit there waiting for the price to go up. It
Speaker 2: can generate passive income for you. With monetary metals, you
Speaker 2: can earn up to five percent interests on your golden
Speaker 2: silver paid in more ounces of metal and a credit
Speaker 2: investors can achieve double digit returns in their bond offerings.
Speaker 2: All interest payments are made and ounces of gold and
Speaker 2: silver stored in your account free of charge. Whether your
Speaker 2: medal is gathering dust at home or costing your annual
Speaker 2: storage fees. It's time to stop paying to own gold
Speaker 2: and start getting paid to own it and put it
Speaker 2: to work with monetary metals. Check out monetary dash metals
Speaker 2: dot com slash lockdown to learn more about how you
Speaker 2: can start growing your wealth and ounces today. Again, that's
Speaker 2: Monetary dash metals dot com slash lockdown or the link
Speaker 2: is in the description below. It's also a post by
Speaker 2: Cultural Husbandry says we have a major problem. Matthew Libelsburger
Speaker 2: AK matt Berg changed his signal safety number just before
Speaker 2: the explosion, and then his photo and safety number changed
Speaker 2: after the explosion. They've got the screenshots. I don't see
Speaker 2: time stamps on them, so I don't know if that's true.
Speaker 2: It's Sunday, December twenty ninth. The attack happened on the first,
Speaker 2: but that's their claim, so if that's true, if that
Speaker 2: can be verified, that is certainly interesting. If his photo
Speaker 2: and safety number changed after he was already deceased. That
Speaker 2: makes absolutely no sense. There is still a lot we
Speaker 2: do not know about Matthew Labelsberger, the alleged Vegas bomber.
Speaker 2: But here's what we do know, and there's a lot
Speaker 2: that does not add up. He recently made the E
Speaker 2: eight list for MSG in twenty twenty three, an eighteen
Speaker 2: Z slot, which means he was a Special Forces soldier
Speaker 2: and if he pinned, would have still been on active duty.
Speaker 2: This also means he was well within his team sergeant time.
Speaker 2: He was an eighteen E Special Forces Communications sergeant and
Speaker 2: then went to the Fox course to become an eighteen
Speaker 2: F Intelligence sergeant before making the E eight list. He
Speaker 2: also apparently was Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems qualified, which implies
Speaker 2: he had training as a drone pilot. I'm submitting a
Speaker 2: Foyer request for his military records, but expect that to
Speaker 2: take some time. He rented the cyber truck from Turo,
Speaker 2: the same company which was used to rent the Lightning
Speaker 2: truck in New Orleans.
Speaker 3: I might add.
Speaker 2: Interesting they are also both electric vehicles. Just a weird coincidence,
Speaker 2: perhaps continuing the same company that the Nola Terraces used.
Speaker 2: The back of the truck was full of mortar, fireworks,
Speaker 2: gasoline canisters, and campfire fuel canisters, which were all combustible
Speaker 2: but would not be ideal for an explosion to create
Speaker 2: maximum damage.
Speaker 3: Here's the crazy part.
Speaker 2: With the level of experience that he had, how does
Speaker 2: it make sense that he would rent a cyber truck,
Speaker 2: which are known to be bulletproof, and fill it with
Speaker 2: ineffective explosives that he would know would not actually damage much,
Speaker 2: if anything. I think that's a very key point that
Speaker 2: I had not thought of myself when I realized that, oh, yeah,
Speaker 2: the cyber truck is like a tank, like you wouldn't
Speaker 2: unless you're going to put a huge explosion that actually
Speaker 2: is capable of making the cyber truck explode, in which
Speaker 2: case the shrapnel from that truck would be extraordinarily damaging.
Speaker 2: What you're doing with this is just creating basically a
Speaker 2: fire bomb within a canister that's hardly going to do anything.
Speaker 2: Doesn't make sense at all, he continues. The front windows
Speaker 2: of the building did not even break. The other crazy part,
Speaker 2: his wife, Sarah Lobelsburger, has multiple anti Trump posts on
Speaker 2: our social media from years and years ago. Now I've
Speaker 2: heard conflicting reports on this that this is in fact
Speaker 2: not true, So take that with a grain of salt.
Speaker 2: So if he was radicalized, if this all was an
Speaker 2: attempt to hurt people and destroy a Trump building, why
Speaker 2: would he go about it in such an incompetent and
Speaker 2: ineffective manner. Lots not adding up here, will add more
Speaker 2: as information comes to light. And just so you know,
Speaker 2: this is the shirt I was talking about. This is
Speaker 2: a Ukrainian symbol here, So yeah, maybe he's hardened to
Speaker 2: paint for Ukraine. It's possible. Still a weird incentive structure.
Speaker 2: Also very very strange that a guy with decades of
Speaker 2: special or I mean decades of military but recent special
Speaker 2: forces capacity would be responsible for this. Also, it should
Speaker 2: be added he allegedly uses a desert eagle to take
Speaker 2: his own life just before setting off the combustible device.
Speaker 1: Now, further complicating this identification of this individual, we also
Speaker 1: discovered through the coroner's office that the individual had sustained
Speaker 1: a gunshot wound to the head prior to the detonation
Speaker 1: of the vehicle. One of the handguns was found at
Speaker 1: his feet inside.
Speaker 6: Of the of the vehicle.
Speaker 2: Now, if you're not familiar with the Desert Eagle. That's
Speaker 2: the firearm that they showed that was nearly burnt to
Speaker 2: a crisp. It is the as far as I know,
Speaker 2: it's the most hardcore handgun you could get. It's a
Speaker 2: fifty col Desert Eagle pistol. That is an extraordinary weapon
Speaker 2: to use on yourself. To put it mildly, Also, if
Speaker 2: you're going to be in a vehicle that's going to
Speaker 2: blow up, why are you taking your own life? Doesn't
Speaker 2: that seem redundant? I hate to be crass, but like
Speaker 2: you're going to perish the explosion anyways, right, So okay, weird. Also,
Speaker 2: it should be added that cyber trucks are in fact
Speaker 2: self driving.
Speaker 3: They are.
Speaker 2: Now that does not mean what I'm about to say
Speaker 2: does not mean that this is what happened, But I
Speaker 2: think it has to be on the table as an option.
Speaker 2: This guy, who doesn't seemingly have a very clear motive,
Speaker 2: he's also got a lot of reasons not to want
Speaker 2: to do this. He is in this vehicle and he
Speaker 2: is deceased, I guess simultaneously as he sets off the
Speaker 2: explosion or maybe the combustion from the pistol starts the
Speaker 2: you know, chain effect of setting off the devices in
Speaker 2: the in the truck.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 2: I don't know how you do that. I guess you
Speaker 2: hit the bomb and you pull the trigger at the
Speaker 2: same time. I don't know's that's the claim. I guess
Speaker 2: you have to believe that's what the claim is, right,
Speaker 2: Or it's self driving, or it's summoned and he is
Speaker 2: already deceased and he is placed in that vehicle and
Speaker 2: then sent to the location for it to be ignited.
Speaker 2: You have to consider this. You have to consider it.
Speaker 2: We're talking about now. Now, let's also add these vehicles,
Speaker 2: particularly in any self driving vehicle as far as I know,
Speaker 2: but certainly Tesla's, they have cameras that are constantly recording
Speaker 2: the driver because they want to make sure and they
Speaker 2: actually look at your eyes and they check your eyes
Speaker 2: to make sure that you're looking at the road, because
Speaker 2: even when you're in self driving mode, you still have
Speaker 2: to keep your eyes on the road or else self
Speaker 2: driving will turn off. Okay, so we have to assume
Speaker 2: that his eyes are on the road, or that security
Speaker 2: precaution has been disabled somehow, and if that has happened, well,
Speaker 2: then that should be evident during this investigation. So I
Speaker 2: think that's the key question. Now we have good news
Speaker 2: potentially in that Elon Musk has announced he intends to
Speaker 2: or he has already sent a Tesla crew down to
Speaker 2: Vegas to get the interior footage.
Speaker 1: Then that vehicle sort of vented out and up, but
Speaker 1: it didn't even damage the glass doors at the Trump
Speaker 1: So I'm not sure what that means. So I also
Speaker 1: know that there's a number of unexploded pieces of the
Speaker 1: things that he had inside of that vehicle, and so
Speaker 1: I just don't think that it was done as well
Speaker 1: as he was expecting it to be done.
Speaker 6: But go ahead, Vegas.
Speaker 7: I was wondering were you able to recover the video
Speaker 7: from the cyber truck or destructure?
Speaker 1: So the question is are we able to recover the
Speaker 1: video from the cyber truck? And many of you may
Speaker 1: know that those cyber trucks contain a tremendous number of cameras. Again,
Speaker 1: mister Musk has sent out a number of his folks
Speaker 1: that will be arriving here this afternoon with the intent
Speaker 1: to try to capture the part of that that captured
Speaker 1: all of the video from inside of the truck.
Speaker 11: Sure, just quickly you had mentioned a number of the
Speaker 11: components in the back of the truck. They did not
Speaker 11: go off. Maybe this is those suit questions for at
Speaker 11: But when it comes to the monimentary nature hope of all,
Speaker 11: I think we mostly think of a bomb that's connected.
Speaker 11: It seems like individual kind of continuing and multiple.
Speaker 3: Components put together.
Speaker 11: Can you speak to how you think this is a
Speaker 11: bomb or was it just several pieces of things that
Speaker 11: might pull off and my explode.
Speaker 3: That would just look and gone off at the same time.
Speaker 12: Yeah, I'll tell you it does appear that it was.
Speaker 12: I would just want to be careful with my language here,
Speaker 12: but the level of sophistication is not what we would
Speaker 12: expect from from an individual with this type of military experience.
Speaker 12: That most of that the materials inside that tesla were
Speaker 12: fuel to an explode, to help fuel a greater explosion,
Speaker 12: but it's too early to answer any question is as
Speaker 12: if there was sophisticated connectivity to those components to make
Speaker 12: it ignite in the way that it did.
Speaker 2: So you actually have investigators in Vegas that are saying
Speaker 2: what I'm saying, It doesn't make sense that a guy
Speaker 2: with special Forces background would create a explosive device that's
Speaker 2: this rudimentary.
Speaker 3: It's bizarre.
Speaker 2: He used fireworks, for God's sakes, anybody else you think
Speaker 2: that makes sense? Now, it's certainly eye popping, it's eye catching.
Speaker 2: You're like, whoa, there's this big explosion with fireworks. But like,
Speaker 2: in terms of actually causing casualties, there's none aside from himself,
Speaker 2: which apparently wasn't even necessary because he took his own
Speaker 2: life just before the explosion. I mean, I'm not the
Speaker 2: only one here, right, Like, you must think this is weird.
Speaker 2: I assume, just like the New Orleans story, I think
Speaker 2: I could be convinced that in fact, this is an
Speaker 2: isis inspired, particularly if we have video of him saying
Speaker 2: it just before or hours prior, as Joe Biden said,
Speaker 2: where he's saying this is what I'm doing, this is why. Okay,
Speaker 2: maybe I'll buy that one. This Vegas story, though, does
Speaker 2: not make sense at all at all. It gets weirder. Okay,
Speaker 2: So mister Libelsberger was stationed in Germany. Do you know
Speaker 2: what happened in Germany just the day prior?
Speaker 3: Yeah? Get ready for this.
Speaker 2: So Matthew Libelsberger was stationed in Germany as a US
Speaker 2: Special Forces soldier and This attack happened on Christmas Eve
Speaker 2: or Christmas Day, I forget which. Germany tries to untangle
Speaker 2: complex profile of mar attack suspect. This is from the
Speaker 2: New York Times. The authority said they were struggling to
Speaker 2: understand the motives behind ramming a car into a Christian
Speaker 2: market in the eastern city of Magdeburg, which left a
Speaker 2: nine year old boy among the five dead. So it
Speaker 2: killed five people. It was a terrible attack, very reminiscent
Speaker 2: of what happened in New Orleans just yesterday morning. Frequent
Speaker 2: critic on social media of the German government, as well
Speaker 2: as of radical Islam, A reclusive neighbor who appeared to
Speaker 2: live most of his life on the internet, A man
Speaker 2: who's extreme political postings online prompted an alert to Germany
Speaker 2: from Saudi Arabia. Officials in Germany were trying on Sunday
Speaker 2: to piece together the complicated profile of the man in
Speaker 2: custody suspected of killing five people by driving an suv
Speaker 2: into a crowd at a Christmas market two days earlier,
Speaker 2: an attack that has stunned the country. The authorities have
Speaker 2: described the suspect as a fifty year old Saudi doctor
Speaker 2: who had been living in Germany for nearly two decades.
Speaker 2: They say they are still trying to determine his motives.
Speaker 2: Men worked as a psychiatrist in their closed ward, treating
Speaker 2: offenders who suffer from drug addiction. The victims of the assault,
Speaker 2: which took place in the eastern city of Magdeburg, were
Speaker 2: a nine year old boy and four women aged forty
Speaker 2: five to seventy five. The police said in a statement
Speaker 2: on Sunday. More than two hundred others were wounded, forty
Speaker 2: one of them seriously, in the attack that shattered the
Speaker 2: peace of Germany's Christmas season, which is celebrated in hundreds
Speaker 2: of outdoor markets around the country. The suspect, identified as
Speaker 2: talab A, in keeping with German privacy laws, was questioned
Speaker 2: on Saturday. Security officials said on Sunday a judge ordered
Speaker 2: him to remain at attention as the authorities continued their investigations.
Speaker 2: Officials said that they were still trying to understand why
Speaker 2: the attacker decided to drive the suv, a rented vehicle,
Speaker 2: into the crowded Christmas market, which was being held in
Speaker 2: a square in front of Magneberg City Hall. Additionally, on
Speaker 2: New Year's Eve, Berlin police say they have detained a
Speaker 2: man who attacked two people with a knife. Berlin police
Speaker 2: say they attained a man Tuesday who attacked and injured
Speaker 2: two people in the city's Charlottenburg neighborhood, further jolting Germany.
Speaker 2: Days after a deadly Christmas market attack elsewhere in the country.
Speaker 2: Police said the attacker was a Syriance that isen with
Speaker 2: residency in Sweden. Initial findings indicate that the suspect may
Speaker 2: have signs of mental illness and that there is not
Speaker 2: indication for a terrorist motivation. Sure sure, sure, all right,
Speaker 2: So you have two attacks in Germany, the same nation
Speaker 2: that the Vegas attacker was stationed in up until two
Speaker 2: weeks ago. They also mirror the attacks that we experienced
Speaker 2: just yesterday.
Speaker 3: So is that all coincidental? Sure?
Speaker 2: Maybe, But just mind you that mister Levelsberger was stationed
Speaker 2: in Germany where these attacks take place. He was put
Speaker 2: on or he had leave for the holidays and came
Speaker 2: home to America to be with his family in Colorado.
Speaker 2: And that just happened two weeks ago, so basically like
Speaker 2: days before this attack in Germany, and then he comes,
Speaker 2: he comes home and he immediately commits a similar styled
Speaker 2: attack of vehicular terrorist attack. Look, I'm not saying that
Speaker 2: that's definitely connected, but it's worth considering. It's absolutely worth considering.
Speaker 2: Also odd that a man who's he's thirty eight, he's
Speaker 2: obviously married, he has a new born at home, and
Speaker 2: he goes to Vegas for New Year's Eve. Like sure,
Speaker 2: some guys in their late thirties might still be doing that.
Speaker 2: I don't know, but if you've been away, you know,
Speaker 2: serving your country in Germany, I don't know why we're
Speaker 2: in Germany, but anyways, and then you have two weeks
Speaker 2: or a couple of weeks leave for the holidays, and
Speaker 2: you go to Vegas with your buddies, leaving your newborn
Speaker 2: at home in Colorado, and you off yourself and you
Speaker 2: rent a truck, which, by the way, that Germany attack
Speaker 2: on Christmas was also a rented truck. Also, the attacker
Speaker 2: on Christmas in Germany is Saudi. The attacker on New
Speaker 2: Year's even Germany is Syrian. That certainly could be isis
Speaker 2: al Qaida type of stuff.
Speaker 3: We don't know.
Speaker 2: So yeah, you guys, see why I'm you see what
Speaker 2: I'm seeing, right, you see why this is all like
Speaker 2: it's it has to if it's not coordinated, I'd be shocked.
Speaker 2: I would be shocked. Now, is it coordinated by ISIS
Speaker 2: slash al Qaeda, as Sarah Adams?
Speaker 3: What have you believe? Maybe?
Speaker 2: Could it be coordinated by another foreign government? The Iranians?
Speaker 2: Probably not. Could it be for coordinated by another foreign government?
Speaker 2: I'll uh, I don't know the one that we're not
Speaker 2: supposed to talk about. I'm not gonna say that one.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 2: Could it be coordinated by our own government? Well, let's
Speaker 2: consider this. In the very next week, after these multitude
Speaker 2: of domestic terrorism attacks, which we've had none of for
Speaker 2: a very long time, or very very few, I should say,
Speaker 2: we have Senate confirmation hearings for Cash Bettel and Tulsi
Speaker 2: Gaber Cash Mattel to head the FBI and Dulci Tulsi
Speaker 2: Gabbert to be d and I Director of National Intelligence,
Speaker 2: the two probably highest positions other than the head of
Speaker 2: the CIA, that would be responsible for reforming these three
Speaker 2: letter agencies, these intelligencies and DHS, these these these agencies
Speaker 2: that are responsible for preventing domestic terrorism. And you're telling
Speaker 2: me that this timing is coincidental maybe or maybe the
Speaker 2: fact that Cash Hottel is up there saying, Yeah, we're
Speaker 2: going to reform a lot, We're gonna cut a lot. Yeah,
Speaker 2: your budget that you've been relying on, Maybe you're not
Speaker 2: going to get that. Maybe we're gonna, you know, fire
Speaker 2: ten thousand people. I hope it's more. I'm not banking
Speaker 2: on it. But same thing with Tulsi Garrett. She is
Speaker 2: very much opposed. In fact, this is the whole reason
Speaker 2: that Hillary Clinton went after her during the Democratic primaries.
Speaker 2: If you recall, she was describing her as a Putin
Speaker 2: apologist and a sad tony or that's what that other
Speaker 2: lady said on Joe Rogan.
Speaker 13: On a podcast interview, Clinton said, quote, they're grooming her
Speaker 13: to be the third party candidate. She's the favorite of
Speaker 13: the Russians. They have a bunch of sights and bots
Speaker 13: and other ways of supporting her so far. Clinton was
Speaker 13: referring to the fact that the Hawaii congresswoman gets a
Speaker 13: lot of attention from Kremlin linked media, just as Green
Speaker 13: Party candidate Jill Stein did back in twenty sixteen. This afternoon,
Speaker 13: Gabbard lashed back, accusing Clinton of trying to destroy her
Speaker 13: reputation and calling Clinton, quote the Queen of warmongers, embodiment
Speaker 13: of corruption and personification of the rot that has sickened
Speaker 13: the Democratic Party for so long.
Speaker 2: But this was all because she actually served and was
Speaker 2: assisting our soldiers coming back from fighting against Al Kaida
Speaker 2: and ISIS. And she's like, wait, we're now arming and
Speaker 2: funding these people. This is insane, Like I saw the
Speaker 2: catastrophic consequences of our soldiers fighting these guys, and now
Speaker 2: we're arming, training, and funding them. She's going to be
Speaker 2: d And I do you think that there's some motivation
Speaker 2: amongst the military industrial complex or the three of their agencies,
Speaker 2: the intelligencies to say, hey, we do not want Tulsi
Speaker 2: Gabbard or Cashptel to be in charge, and if they
Speaker 2: are going to be in charge, if the Senate is
Speaker 2: going to confirm them, we want the American people scared
Speaker 2: to death so that any cuts or reforms that they
Speaker 2: attempt to make the American people will not go along with.
Speaker 2: Could that be the motivation? It sure could be. Not
Speaker 2: saying it is, but you if you aren't considering that angle,
Speaker 2: you're crazy. That has to be an angle of consideration
Speaker 2: and concern. I mean, these are major reformers that are
Speaker 2: coming in here. At least that's what they've advertised. Whether
Speaker 2: or not they'll do it, we don't know. It's TV
Speaker 2: same with Trump for that matter, or Kennedy at HHS.
Speaker 2: I certainly hope so, and I have a relatively high
Speaker 2: amount of faith that he'll reform a lot.
Speaker 3: But I don't know.
Speaker 2: This is all like, I haven't seen much reform in
Speaker 2: my lifetime in the federal government, so for me to
Speaker 2: have any optimism is already pushing it. I'm naturally pretty
Speaker 2: bestimistic about reforming the system. But Tulsi, Gabert, Cashpritzel are
Speaker 2: certainly reformers in terms of lip service. There is a
Speaker 2: lot of motivation to try and stop these people, or
Speaker 2: at least create public distrust of any reforms that they
Speaker 2: might attempt to make, So that is another consideration that
Speaker 2: has to be on the table. So yeah, add all
Speaker 2: of this up and you're like, what the fuck are
Speaker 2: we talking about here?
Speaker 3: What is this?
Speaker 2: And at the end of the day, just as I
Speaker 2: open up this episode, I don't know. I'm not sure.
Speaker 2: It's very concerning. It's very sad, assuming this isn't our
Speaker 2: own government, which I'd say is there's a decent chance
Speaker 2: that it's not. It tells me that we're probably in
Speaker 2: World war or at least it tells me that we're
Speaker 2: at war, that there are foreign governments or foreign entities
Speaker 2: like Isis and al Qaida, which by the way, have
Speaker 2: both been trained by the Israelis and the American government
Speaker 2: from time to time, not just not just armed, but
Speaker 2: trained funded all of it. So even if it is
Speaker 2: them and they're not a government, not a foreign government,
Speaker 2: it's still kind of a government that could be behind this.
Speaker 3: So you got to you.
Speaker 2: Gotta remember at all times that these these you know,
Speaker 2: nefarious terrorist groups usually have state sponsors, like they definitely
Speaker 2: have state sponsors. Are they Are they carrying out these
Speaker 2: attacks on Americans at the behest of a government that
Speaker 2: I can't say definitively there is.
Speaker 3: There is.
Speaker 2: As Scott Horton talked about the last time I had
Speaker 2: him on about a month ago, he's very concerned about
Speaker 2: actual Muslim extremists terrorist attacks in America. And I take
Speaker 2: his concern seriously, and I think that there's a distinct
Speaker 2: possibility that's what we saw yesterday, particularly in New Orleans.
Speaker 2: But the fact that it's a US soldier gives me
Speaker 2: pause on just saying Scott was right, that's what this is.
Speaker 2: This is al Qaeda isis inspired. That's all that there
Speaker 2: is to this. I think it's deeper than that. The
Speaker 2: symbolic nature, particularly of the cyber truck explosion, using a
Speaker 2: Special Forces guy, twenty year military veteran with fireworks to
Speaker 2: basically only take his own life. Oh and might I
Speaker 2: add he takes his own life just before he detonates
Speaker 2: the bomb, which doesn't kill anybody but him, doesn't even
Speaker 2: break the glass on Trump Tower. However, you have the
Speaker 2: incredible jaw dropping optics of this fireworks explosion in a
Speaker 2: cyber truck, this new space age vehicle that's directly in
Speaker 2: front of Trump International Hotel. And you're telling me that
Speaker 2: symbology is accidental. Definitely not so uh yeah, That's where
Speaker 2: I'm at with it. And as I said to open,
Speaker 2: not going to begin to say that I know definitively,
Speaker 2: but we need to demand real investigative reporting and real
Speaker 2: investigations because I have, as Senator Kennedy said, little trust
Speaker 2: in these people. I mean, he didn't say that, but
Speaker 2: that's what that's what he was saying. He does not
Speaker 2: trust the FBI or DHS to actually investigate this issue.
Speaker 2: Here's the downside of this, Because we don't have governmental
Speaker 2: institutions that we trust any longer, and deservedly, so they
Speaker 2: did it to themselves. We are now reliant on independent journalists,
Speaker 2: which apparently I'm now kind of one, even though I'm
Speaker 2: just scraping the internet to try and figure out what
Speaker 2: the fuck's happening. But we have a lot of independent
Speaker 2: journalists that are doing really good work, and better work
Speaker 2: than the FEDS. So that's the upside is that now
Speaker 2: we have these other independent minded people that are genuinely
Speaker 2: interested in the truth that are out there pursuing this
Speaker 2: twenty four to seven. The downside is that many of
Speaker 2: these people are not really good at the job, like me,
Speaker 2: Like I am not equipped to be doing criminal terrorist
Speaker 2: investigations to figure out what the fuck happened, But I'm
Speaker 2: kind of now put in that role because we don't
Speaker 2: have institutions that are reliably going to pursue it themselves.
Speaker 2: So I will continue to try and convey the evidence
Speaker 2: to you as best I can, as unbiased.
Speaker 3: As I can.
Speaker 2: I'm open about my biases and let you guys decide
Speaker 2: for yourself. But I think that what I've shown you
Speaker 2: over the past hour is enough for all of us
Speaker 2: to go, yeah, there's something very weird going on here.
Speaker 2: I didn't even mention that there was two other attacks
Speaker 2: the same day that I don't think meet the threshold
Speaker 2: of terrorism. But there was a hostage situation in Vegas
Speaker 2: late that afternoon January first afternoon diffused and they undone.
Speaker 2: Lots of crazy shit happens in Vegas every day, so
Speaker 2: I'm just going to assume that was a crazy dude
Speaker 2: who took control of people and then it got resolved.
Speaker 3: There was also a.
Speaker 2: Fairly major shooting in Queen's last night, and to the
Speaker 2: best of my knowledge, no one actually died, thankfully, but
Speaker 2: a bunch of people got shot. It looks like it
Speaker 2: was at a nightclub and it was probably you know,
Speaker 2: gang or just bar fight type of shit. So I
Speaker 2: don't think that that rises to the level of terrorism.
Speaker 2: But what you can see is because you have these
Speaker 2: two attacks which appear to be in my opinion, terrorism,
Speaker 2: the Vegas in New Orleans, that then you have these
Speaker 2: other events that are you know, violent crime that everybody
Speaker 2: jumps to the conclusion, ah, this is terrorism. But see,
Speaker 2: this is the entire idea behind terrorism is that once
Speaker 2: you have the population scared, that everything they see around
Speaker 2: them they're scared by, and they assume that, oh, this
Speaker 2: is more of that thing that I'm on guard for.
Speaker 2: And I think that's what makes this really challenging to
Speaker 2: try and assess. The truth is that once you're once
Speaker 2: you're just looking for terrorism, that's all you're gonna see.
Speaker 2: And if you're just looking at the same thing. Libertarians
Speaker 2: have to caution themselves against this, including myself. Once you're
Speaker 2: just looking for false legs, once you're just looking for
Speaker 2: United States government through letter agencies that are responsible for
Speaker 2: doing shady shit, that's all you see. That's not all
Speaker 2: that happens. There are groups all over the world that
Speaker 2: do not like Americans. Okay, that's quite obvious, and in
Speaker 2: many ways justifiably so. For decades of war and bombing
Speaker 2: campaigns and you know, CIA black sites and torture and
Speaker 2: everything else. Like, there's a lot of justifiable reason for hate,
Speaker 2: there's also a lot of unjustifiable reason that they just
Speaker 2: they're Islamisists and they want to have a caliphate, and
Speaker 2: anybody that's not a believer needs to perish that that
Speaker 2: exists too. So you have to just keep all of
Speaker 2: this in your head at the same time.
Speaker 3: And I know it's really hard.
Speaker 2: I struggle with it myself, but that's I think that's
Speaker 2: the only way that you can actually really assess this
Speaker 2: and come to a fair conclusion, or at least a
Speaker 2: fair initial assessment as to what we're experiencing. And this
Speaker 2: is why I bring it all up, and this is
Speaker 2: why I'm ultimately so concerned that we pursue the truth
Speaker 2: on this and we don't panic. This is the sorospac
Speaker 2: DA of New Orleans. Jason Williams.
Speaker 14: Things are going to have to change.
Speaker 6: Just after nine to eleven.
Speaker 8: I remember a time.
Speaker 14: When I could run from my car to the gate
Speaker 14: to catch a flight. After nine eleven, we realize we
Speaker 14: need to do things very, very differently so that we
Speaker 14: can all arrive at our destination safely. I think you're
Speaker 14: going to see a lot of things change in the
Speaker 14: city of New Orleans, and actually I think you're going
Speaker 14: to see a lot of things change in this country
Speaker 14: in terms of how we handle large scale events where
Speaker 14: there's pedestrian access and where vehicles are allowed.
Speaker 6: I think you're going to see things change.
Speaker 14: In terms of the type of the level of surveillance
Speaker 14: that we have in this country. We've pushed back against
Speaker 14: some of that, but when you look at places like
Speaker 14: the UK and other European places where CCTV is very
Speaker 14: commonplace and used proactively so that it can look for
Speaker 14: signs or indications of an attack. I think you're gonna
Speaker 14: start seeing those things in this city because I'm going
Speaker 14: to be pushing for them, and you're gonna probably see
Speaker 14: them in a lot of other places that are destination cities,
Speaker 14: like the city of New Orleans.
Speaker 2: We failed to keep you safe, and now we're gonna
Speaker 2: need to obliterate the Bill of Rights to keep you
Speaker 2: safe even though we couldn't keep you safe after basically
Speaker 2: obliterating the Bill of Rights with the Patriot Act twenty
Speaker 2: years ago. Fuck you, let me make that real clear.
Speaker 2: Fuck you. No, I'm not interested in living in a
Speaker 2: further police state, a surveillance state. And might I add,
Speaker 2: despite the fact that you've already disarmed the people of
Speaker 2: the UK and put up cameras everywhere, they still deal
Speaker 2: with terrorism regularly, and stabbings and everything else and vehicle attacks.
Speaker 2: So no, how about that. How about we have a
Speaker 2: bill of rights that says you can't do that, could we?
Speaker 2: Or are we just fucking forgetting about that?
Speaker 3: Entirely?
Speaker 2: I absolutely reject this, and this is why I think
Speaker 2: it's so important that we do not accept at face
Speaker 2: value the initial reports from the government when it comes
Speaker 2: to these attacks, because they're going to try and paint
Speaker 2: it as favorably for their ends as humanly possible. Well,
Speaker 2: at least I'm being open about my ends.
Speaker 3: My ends.
Speaker 2: My intended end goal with this analysis is that we
Speaker 2: do not lose any more freedom. Okay, also I would
Speaker 2: like us to be safe, yes, But at the end
Speaker 2: of the day, my highest priority is that we do
Speaker 2: not give away more of our rights because they are
Speaker 2: fucking God given and you don't have a right to
Speaker 2: take them away in the first place. But as you
Speaker 2: can tell right there, the Soros bag, da scumbag is
Speaker 2: absolutely angling to do so, and he says it explicitly
Speaker 2: that he intends to be pushing for this.
Speaker 3: And guess what, you will see a lot.
Speaker 2: Of people in Congress, including Republicans, who will attempt, through
Speaker 2: hook or by crook, to increase surveillance, as if they
Speaker 2: don't already have enough funding or tools in the first place.
Speaker 2: They have re upped warrantless spying. Okay, they already can
Speaker 2: spy on us without a warrant, which is I don't
Speaker 2: know the clearest example of a violation of the Constitution
Speaker 2: I've ever heard of in my entire fucking life. You
Speaker 2: think they won't try and take more, You think they
Speaker 2: won't try and take away additional firearms, because that's what
Speaker 2: they do all the time. You think it's coincidental that
Speaker 2: both of these attackers had I think was a AR
Speaker 2: fifteen or AK forty seven and AR ten, like, oh yeah,
Speaker 2: they just both happen to have assault rifles. Gonna have
Speaker 2: to do something about that, right, Gonna have to have
Speaker 2: cameras allah the UK. In America, No, I don't want
Speaker 2: to live like that. I don't know any American that does.
Speaker 2: And it's not going to keep us more safe because
Speaker 2: your sons of bitches already have the capacity, funding, and
Speaker 2: technology to spy on us twenty four to seven, and
Speaker 2: you don't keep us safe. You can't even control our
Speaker 2: own fucking borders, but you're gonna have surveillance up my
Speaker 2: ass I rejected. Everybody ought to and Congress will be
Speaker 2: maneuvering similarly. Don't get it twisted. Don't think because I
Speaker 2: voted for Trump that I'm some rite or die Republican.
Speaker 3: Far from it.
Speaker 2: These people absolutely don't give a shit about your privacy rights,
Speaker 2: and they certainly don't give a fuck about ending the
Speaker 2: war on terror, or ending the military industrial complex, or
Speaker 2: ending the empire and stopping creating additional animosity all over
Speaker 2: the world to justify the ground invasion that we've experienced
Speaker 2: over the past four years. That leads to all of
Speaker 2: these potentials for sleeper cells, as Sarah Adams detailed, with
Speaker 2: a thousand guys here ready to be activated at any time.
Speaker 2: They can't keep you safe.
Speaker 3: You can.
Speaker 2: If you allow them to disarm you, you will not
Speaker 2: be more safe. I promise you that if you allow
Speaker 2: them to surveil you twenty four to seven, you will
Speaker 2: not be more safe. I promise you that you will
Speaker 2: be less free and less safe. That's where this ends,
Speaker 2: and that is why I did this episode because I
Speaker 2: think you guys all know that. But anytime there is
Speaker 2: a terrorist, you know action, people tend to forget what
Speaker 2: matters most, And what matters most is not safety. What
Speaker 2: matters most is freedom, because freedom leads to safety. Don't
Speaker 2: get it twisted. Don't let them convince you otherwise, and
Speaker 2: don't let them invert that reality. You are not safer
Speaker 2: when you have a totalitarian government that surveils you twenty
Speaker 2: four to seven.
Speaker 3: That's just a fact.
Speaker 2: If you don't believe me, look at any government that
Speaker 2: surveils its people twenty four to seven and ask yourself.
Speaker 2: Do they seem as if they're crushing? Does the UK
Speaker 2: seem to be flourishing?
Speaker 3: Fuck?
Speaker 2: No, it doesn't. What about the rest of Europe? What
Speaker 2: about China? North Korea?
Speaker 1: No?
Speaker 3: Oh, let's follow in their footsteps. Fuck you. I'll finish
Speaker 3: with this.
Speaker 2: According to his resume, this is the Matthew Liwlsburger attacker
Speaker 2: in Vegas. He changes his resume US Army nineteen years
Speaker 2: and one month, so he's almost at twenty years, which
Speaker 2: I think is where you're able to retire with full benefits.
Speaker 2: He changes it from November twenty twenty four, so just
Speaker 2: two plus months ago, says Remote and Autonomous Systems manager.
Speaker 2: I don't know about you, but that sounds like autonomous
Speaker 2: sounds like self driving type of technology, don't it? And
Speaker 2: he commits a terrorist attack, taking his own life. Two
Speaker 2: months later in a self driving vehicle, Oh Kidoki. And
Speaker 2: just to give you a kind of a recap of
Speaker 2: why I'm so skeptical of government narratives, I posted this
Speaker 2: early this morning. I was in a space as making
Speaker 2: the case that the Vegas attack makes no sense to
Speaker 2: me and might be a false flag. Everyone agreed it was,
Speaker 2: but refused to believe that the federal government might stage
Speaker 2: an attack to justify a war north Woods Tonkin' WMDs.
Speaker 3: No, how about funding COVID?
Speaker 2: How about killing millions of people with a bido weapon
Speaker 2: and putting the guy who greenlit the funding in charge
Speaker 2: of the response team. How about letting him lie to
Speaker 2: Congress about all of it and never charging him as
Speaker 2: he was clearly the bagman for the CIA. How about
Speaker 2: the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping Oaks? How about the J six
Speaker 2: pipe bomber who was apparently the only person on J
Speaker 2: six they couldn't track down in jail while they rounded
Speaker 2: up a thousand other people. How about OKC? How about Waco?
Speaker 2: How about Ruby Ridge? How about the multiple attempts on Trump?
Speaker 2: How about that prime sniper location that just happened to
Speaker 2: be left unguarded because the roof pitch was too dangerous,
Speaker 2: but the counter stiper team was actually on another roof
Speaker 2: with a worse pitch. How about the dozen examples of
Speaker 2: the FEDS and trapping after teaching them how to create
Speaker 2: inert IDs. How about all the mass shooters who were
Speaker 2: on their radar but never got stopped. How about MLK
Speaker 2: RFK JFK Malcolm X, No, couldn't be You're crazy.
Speaker 3: Now. I'm not saying that any.
Speaker 2: Of the attacks yesterday were definite or definitively false flags.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 2: There are a ton of people all of the world
Speaker 2: that would like to kill us over our insane foreign policy,
Speaker 2: no doubt. But if you think it's impossible that the
Speaker 2: US government was responsible for these attacks, you simply don't
Speaker 2: know what your government is or what it's capable of. Now, fortunately,
Speaker 2: I've got a great audience that undoubtedly does know what
Speaker 2: this government is and what it's capable of. So I
Speaker 2: just want to remind you that you're not wrong and
Speaker 2: you're not crazy to question these narratives that are foisted
Speaker 2: upon you in the aftermath of catastrophic, horrific terrorist attacks.
Speaker 2: It does not make you mean, It does not make
Speaker 2: you heartless to say I'm not sure what I actually
Speaker 2: just witnessed. Let's give it time, Let's be cautious, let's
Speaker 2: think for ourselves, let's dig deeper, let's rely on sources
Speaker 2: that are actually interested in the truth as opposed to narratives,
Speaker 2: and let's fucking come to a conclusion that does not
Speaker 2: result in insult to injury. Insult being that our rights
Speaker 2: are eroded further after the injuries to our fellow countrymen.
Speaker 2: I think that's the gravest injustice of all. And I
Speaker 2: think that the people that gerrish on nine to eleven,
Speaker 2: as catastrophic and heartbreaking as that was, would not feel
Speaker 2: better that we then went and invaded multiple countries that
Speaker 2: had nothing to do with nine to eleven in the aftermath.
Speaker 2: That is not justice, in fact, it is it is
Speaker 2: the heartless. That is the true heartless way of dealing
Speaker 2: with acts of terrorism is to just accept whatever the
Speaker 2: government tells you and allow them to go out and
Speaker 2: bomb whoever they want. As a consequence of it, think
Speaker 2: for yourself, That's all I ask. Thank you guys so
Speaker 2: much for tuning in. Please do hit the like button, subscribe,
Speaker 2: share this around, particularly now for those that are are
Speaker 2: panicked send this to them. Let them, Let them actually
Speaker 2: evaluate this information for themselves and think for themselves, and
Speaker 2: hopefully we can diminish the panic in this country and
Speaker 2: preserve our God given rights.
Speaker 3: See so welcome to liberty lockdown. Let's got your flock.
Speaker 12: De liberty ain't come but yeah it's not.
Speaker 3: Call it come from?
Speaker 11: And where did it