Speaker 1: Good morning to everyone watching live, we appreciate you doing that,
and to everybody who is watching in their listening later,
we appreciate you equally. Just a programming note, a reminder
that we're making a change with Substack, and it's going
to become kind of a more intimate thing. It's going
to be me doing videos and often chatting with you.
We turn on the live chat feature and we'll hang
out together. We're doing that because I want to have
content available for people who subscribe and have been with
us a very very long time that is not on YouTube,
and there's an increasing amount of content that's going on YouTube.
And I made you a promise that was going to
make sure that Substack was special that way, and I
intend to keep that promise. So it's going to be
kind of cool stuff because it'll be just you and
I chatting. In fact, I think it's going to be
very very cool. We're doing this for a commercial reality.
YouTube is the biggest podcasting platform in the world bar none,
and because we're actually succeeding in reaching young people by
wrapping the word of God up in news and pop culture.
And that's why I do what I do, quite honestly,
and thank you for making that possible. We'll get started now,
with the help of God Almighty, into today's topic, and
that is the Left has openly decided to declare war
against the First Amendment. Openly. They're not even pretending anymore.
Do this with the help of the Lord who invented
free speech.
Speaker 2: The Todd Herman Show is one hundred percent disapproved by
big pharma technocrats and tyrants everywhere. Now from the high
mountains of Free America, here's the Emerald City exile cod Herman.
Speaker 1: Today is a day the Lord has made in These
are the times through which God has decided we shall live.
So we'll good a question for you. Let me ask
it this way. Do you think uh, let me start again. No,
I'm not the honest reaching for the edit bord. Oh
Herman's lost it. No, No, I haven't let me ask
you this. Do you think I could prove to you
that God is pro free speech, that God is a
backer of the topic of the First Amendment to the
United States Constitution that recognizes our right to free speech
exists because God created us. But I can if you
go to one of the most beautiful verses in all
of the Bible, This comes from John, chapter one, verses
one through five, the entire John. The book John is
a beautiful book. It's one that a many of my
friends who are helping people come to the Lord recommend
that they read right away because it's so beautiful and
it speaks to the deity of Jesus and the fact
that Jesus always existed with God, the Father and the
holy spirits so beautifully written. In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
He was with God in the beginning. Through him, all
things were made Without him, nothing made that has been
made was made that has been made. In him was life,
and that life was the light of all mankind. The
light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not
overcome it. For John, who walked with Jesus, who was
a friend of Jesus, to say that, and to say
it that way is an inspired thing, directly inspired by God.
Now what would that mean that God was the Word,
the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Well,
clearly he's referring to Jesus here as the Word. But
how could that be. Words are for us, They were
invented for us. God doesn't need words. First of all,
God the Father, the Holy Spirits, and Jesus are a
triune god locked together. They don't need words to communicate
with one another. They're all knowing, all seeing. I've always existed,
always will exist. Knowing all things means you don't need
to communicate much. You just no. You may have minor, tiny,
little experiences like this in life, where you know someone
very very well, and you walk into a room and
you see them and you instantly know what they're feeling.
You don't guess, you know, my friend, my friend's really
glad to see me, my friend's angry. You just know.
Jesus and God are the words love, truth, honesty, charity, empathy, justice.
They gave us words to express concepts to one another
because they don't need the words, like they don't need clocks,
they don't need calendars, they don't need night and day,
they don't need food. When Jesus took on human form,
he communicated through the mouth of a human the word.
He demonstrated his access to deity, because remember, he had
kind of forfeited his deity by praying to the God
the Father, giving thanks and asking that his will be done.
Sometimes through Jesus, very maturely in fact, in raising Lazarus
from the dead and performing all these miracles. If God
was not in favor of free speech, he could eliminate it.
There would be things we can't say, And so far
as I can tell, in the Bible, there's only one
thing we can say or think that really really bothers
God to the degree that it is an unforgivable sin,
and that is to blaspheme the Holy Spirit. And I
have yet to meet a theologian who could really explain
that one. So be careful what you say about the
Holy Spirit. God is pro free speech. The mockingbird media
and the left are not the people who think they
run the world, who think they have power and don't
understand that they have no power over us but that
which the Father grants for his own glory and his
own good. They also hate free speech, which is another
way they stand a verse entirely to the word. Yeah,
the word of God, but also the word that is Jesus.
So we'll dig through some of this together, beginning with
the debates. Look debates a big business, and this was
a big night for CBS. It was a big night
for ABC. I mean, it's a vice presidential debate, but
it got pretty good views, and afterwards it got a
huge number of views on social media. It's people washing
in to see these these dishpan eyes of Tim Waltz
as he's failing to prepare. He's scribbling down notes at
a very calm jd vance. Jd vance was so common
this that it almost gave me, well almost comfort. And
I don't take comfort from Washington d C. I take
comfort from honest people who know how things are working
right now. My friend Zach Abraham, chief investment officer bull
Or Capital Management, is one of those guys. He's as
bothered by world events as you are. It's just that
he sees them differently. He sees them as a fiduciary
who who's job is to put your financial interests well
above his own, always, every single time. Consequently, he makes
decisions that might keep you away from having huge, huge
rides and stock like Nvidia, you might not get that
huge high. His goal is to make sure you never
get the huge bottoming out. He operates on risk management
and by knowing the rules, and right now there aren't any,
so risk management is even more important. He does this
by actively managing every single portfolio. Find out from Zach
if you are ready for retirement. Find out if your
portfolio is set up for risk management. Find out if
it's being actively managed and if it is, and if
you're in good stead, he will tell you. He just
told a friend of mine's dad. You don't need me.
You did great on your own. You're good to go.
So find out good to Know your Risk radio dot com.
That's know Know your Risk radio dot com and simply
ask for a free, no obligation chit chat either video
phone call. You can even go see him in person.
It's no your Risk radio dot com or call eight
sixty six seven to seven nine.
Speaker 3: RISKS Investment Advisory services offered through Trek Financial LOOC and
SEC Registered Investment Advisor. The opinions expressed in this programer
for general informational purposes only and are not intended to
provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual or on
any specific security. Any references to performance of security so
it thought to be materially accurate, and actual performance may
different investments involved risk and are not guaranteed. Past performance
doesn't guarantee future results. TECK twenty four three zero eight.
Speaker 1: The two political agitators pretending to be moderated during the
debate do not like it that jd Vance chose not
to be shut up or stifled, as Archie used to
say to Edith on all in the family. And if
you're too young to know that show, look it up.
Here's jd Vance refusing to be dummy checked, not fact checked,
dummy checked. All right, but thank you, senator. We having
so much to.
Speaker 4: Get to, Margaret, I think it's important to turn out
of the economy.
Speaker 5: Thanks Margaret.
Speaker 4: The rules were that you got to in a fact check,
and since you're fact checking me, I think it's important
to say what's actually going on. So there's an application
called the CBP one app where you can go on
as an illegal migrant, apply for asylum or apply for
parole and be granted legal status at the wave of
a Kamala Harris open border Wand that is not a
person coming in applying for a green cart and waiting
for ten years. Thank you the Senator of a legal
immigration Margaret bye.
Speaker 1: Thank you senator for describing the legal so much to
get they're talking over and attempting to. Jd Vance very
calmly handles them very calmly, very respectfully, and they can't
stand it. In the beginning was the word You can
disagree with JD. Vance's opinion that this is a bad idea,
You cannot disagree with the fact that the app exists.
That's exactly what it does. There are people and we
played the video on the show of people who've downloaded
the app and used it to show that in a
matter of minutes, hey, we're ready to fly you into
our country and to place you into a position convenient
for us in terms of the electoral college, and then
making sure that we register you to vote so that
we have a ballot in your name that we could
use fraudulently. In the beginning was the word God is truth.
When you trample on truth, whether or not it's the
word of God, when you're trampling on material truth, you're
kicking sand in God's face, because he is truth, He
is justice. Do you get that? If you're going to
declare war on something, understand that on which you are
declaring war. This comes from the New Yorker The New
York Times three headlines is it time to torch the Constitution?
Some scholars say that it's to blame for our political dysfunction,
and that we need to start over. The Constitution is sacred,
Is it also dangerous? One of the biggest threats to
American policies might be the Constitution. And then this coming
right out and stating it's nakedly elections are bad for democracy. Now,
clearly the handwrit liners wrote that last one to get
clicks and to get engagement and its clickbait, except for
the fact that the editorial makes that exact case that
only the smart people, only the people who are demonstrably smart,
should be allowed to choose are so called leaders. How
do you demonstrate smartness? Well, you agree with who this
is smart people? How do you know that the smart
ones because they agree? That form of consensus, of course,
has nothing in relation to the truth. It has nothing
in relation to intelligence. We shared yesterday in the show
that the fact that curiosity is a sign of intelligence,
if you're always asking questions, always seeking to learn, curiosity
is a sign of intelligence. If you're not curious about
your world, it's not not necessarily be that you're stupid.
It might be that you've been taught that curiosity is
a very very bad thing. It's been modeled for you
trust your betters. This is what the argument that voting
is bad for democracies about. But it's also part of
the motive for people who are world bosses. Curiosity bugs them,
because questions bug them, because they are the smart ones.
And if you've ever had an opportunity to question a
really smart person on a really simple thing and watch
them get bugged, it's pretty instructive. Now, this isn't on
the level of our so called democracy, our republic falling apart,
but let me give you just a tiny little example,
because it's tiny and it's interesting and it's sort of funny.
When I worked at Microsoft, I was making the case
that we should take a separate business unit set it
up as a media company media tech company, because Microsoft
was compromised on this front. And what it mean by
that is when MSN had traffic and it was a
big website and to some degree it still is, but
when that was happening, everybody got access to it. So
the product teams and the software teams, we need to
push Windows, and we need to put you so it
was just this mess. So what I said is, look,
let's set up a media company on the outside and
let us give some links and some traffic out of hotmail,
et cetera. Let us operate independently, and let us, as
a bet go purchase YouTube, and let's spend the good
amount of money on YouTube. But leave them alone. Let
them build what they're building and continue to become the
juggernaut that they're building. Now, this was when YouTube was
just beginning, but those of us who were in the
online video world at the time saw where it was headed.
It was obvious. It's not that you're smart, it's simply
that you can read graphs. And I made this case
to a senior vice president who is a really, really
smart man. He is unbelievably intellectually gifted. And we were
in this discussion and I said to him, we should
make this purchase. He said, this is a fact. This
is an exact quote Todd. No one is going to
sit there and watch videos of cats peeing in toilets.
And I said to him, really, even the people who
post them and their friends. Oh no, I understand the
circle of influence. I understand the long tail. But what
if the next video is a video of cats playing,
and then of cats doing other things? And what if
people set there for twenty minutes and suddenly there's a
video that's a documentary about cats, and what if that
turns into a forty minute view session and now it's
four hundred thousand people watching that. Well, that's not going
to happen, but it is. It is happening. This is
the long tail of user generated content leading to the
big tail of content we pay to have. He couldn't
see it. Now people see different things. I'm not claiming
to be smarter than him, but the chart was right there.
It turned out that it was this. He'd already placed
his bet, he'd already gone into the powers it be.
His bet was to build our own Everyone remembers that, right,
our viral video service at Microsoft. I mean, don't you
remember Soapbox? You don't, but it was Microsoft. He placed
his bets, and the people who are running the world
have placed their bets, and their bet is they can
shut you up, but they don't know what they're at
war against. That senior vice president did a lot for me.
I am deeply, deeply thankful for him. On that topic.
We disagreed. He did not understand what he is at
war against. He thought he was at war against a
video sharing service. He was at war against the world's
second most important search engine and first most important media
search engine. That thing he never saw. Bill Gates didn't
see it. He actually liked our video service. He actually
premiered it in Las Vegas. Had an event with Jay
Leno that happened, big, big fun day for me. Bill
Gates hates your free speech, which is so bizarre because
Bill Gates used to organize meetings at Microsoft where you
could speak freely.
Speaker 6: To him.
Speaker 1: About where you thought the company had gone wrong, and
he solicited these things. He used to go through these
FTP servers we had where you could put up a
strategy paper or whatever, paper product, paper product, pitch, and
if Bill found that interesting, he would take it and
read it on vacation, and you might get a call
from one of his tech leads like I did. Bill's
really really curious about this. Would you agree to brief
him on it? Would I agree to brief Bill Gates
on something?
Speaker 5: Uh?
Speaker 1: Yeah? And I sent that to my boss and his
boss and they were with me in three minutes. Come
in here, we came in. This is a big deal,
like and will help you build your presentation, will create
the presentation. We'll present. The presentation effectively is what they
wanted to do. So what happened. Bill Gates has placed
his bet with the powers that be, the powers that
surround him is fellow leaders of the world, and a
lot of it is going right down into the code
that is our bodies, the code that writes us, software,
that writes software, hardware that creates hardware. That's what God
has created for us. It is readable, repeatable, understandable, and shaable.
It's language, and that language can be hacked for its
own good. Your body needs amino acids. It meets them
in a great deal of ways, a number of ways
to sustain muscle, to build muscle, to keep you healthy
in other ways. But really it's based upon muscle. Life
compromises that, age compromises that. Doing things like restrictive dieting
compromises that and can actually reduce the amount of muscle
in your body. Now, if that happens, that happens as
we age, but you can slow it down. When you
see reduced muscle, you see increased stress on your skeletal system,
you see increased stress on your digestive system. But there's
an easy, simple hack I've been using for about two years,
and I only recently got permission to share it with you.
So this is new. Masszymes is a digestive enzyme mixed
from my friends at Bioptimizers. It took them two hundred
and forty three experiments before they would let me use
it and let you use it. That capped off with
the test side by side. An actual academic look at
this turns out that when people use mass symes they
see a one hundred percent increase in what I just
told you. You need amino acids in your body to
help sustain muscle and even to encourage muscle growth. You
can get this by opening a bottle, taking three tablets
a couple times a day, which is what I've done
for a couple of years. Go do this now. Go
to Boptimizers dot com slash tod. You get ten percent
off mass Symes and all their products at Biptomizers. This
is Bioptemizers dot com slash todd. Stop letting poor digestion
stop you from reaching your full potential. It is Biptimizers
dot com slash todd ten percent off. There here's Bill Gates.
He has placed his bet. He's talking here about his
need to be able to shut you up.
Speaker 5: We should have free speech, but if you're inciting violence,
if you're causing people not to take vaccines, you know,
where are those boundaries that even the US should, you know.
Speaker 1: Have rules.
Speaker 5: And then if you have rules, you know what is it?
Is there some AI that encodes those rules because you
have billions of activity and you know, if you catch
it a day later, the harmons is done.
Speaker 1: This man is stating that a discussion about a medical
approach should be overruled by an AI written by people
like him, that it should be disappeared from society, that
the ideas in case in that should be disappeared from society.
Let's take a good old fashioned medicine. I used to
eat iberprof and a bunch. I didn't understand that it
was destroying my liver. No, that's not true. I did
understand it, I didn't understand how it was happening. I
didn't understand that it destroyed my gut lining and therefore
put particles in my bloodstream that didn't belong there. That's
just iberprofen and Bill Gates has absolutely no issue with
us discussing that. But what about this? What about what
about steps and measures to make sure that you don't
need medicines. I mean, he's talking here about a communicable disease,
So let's lean into that. Let's give him the benefit
of the doubts. Okay, let's give Bill the benefit of
the doubt that these these these injections, these medicines are
helpful for stopping disease. Okay, benefit of the doubt. What
about if we go upstream from that, what about if
you encourage people to not eat things like fake meat.
Why because they put an enormous tax in your digestive system.
Why because you're not designed to eat that stuff. Your
body is not designed to take something that's been through
two thousand steps of refinement so that it appears to
be meat when it's in fact carrots and beets and
goo and soy, and in those amounts. Your body is
never meant to eat those things in those amounts. Carrots
are designed to be hard to eat. You ever notice
your kits sit down and eat a bunch of carrots.
I eat carrots three times a day. Effectively. My source
of carbs is carrots and potatoes, And sometimes I'm not
all excited to eat them, but it's a fuel that
works for my body. But You can't sit down and
eat that amount of carrots and make you sick. Our
bodies aren't designed that way. But when you refine something
down to the point where it goes and sometimes bypasses
the digestive system and goes straight into your bluddure. Mmm,
the impossible burger is so very tasty. I feel so satiated,
And here comes my insulin eye that you're now going
to chase from vegetables and soy and seed oil. That's
destroying you. Should we not be allowed to have these
conversations because people who don't eat that stuff on a
consistent basis are more healthy. People who don't eat processed
foods on a more consistent basis are less likely to
go out and get respiratory viruses. Funny thing, since I
lost all this weight, I don't get my twice a year.
What I used to think was bronchitis I found out
later was a It was a bacterial infection I was
getting twice a year. How come I don't get that anymore?
Is it because I exercise? I do CrossFit? Is it
because I drink four hundred ounces of water day three
hundred and sixty grams of protein? Why is that you
know what it is. It's because my digestive system is
not being assaulted by processed foods. It's not meant to
process because I'm not living with inflammation. So can we
go further upstream of this? Let's go up to this stream,
the garden of Eden. The closer you can eat to
the garden of Eden, the better off you are, which
is a way that some vegans argue. I'm not a vegan,
my daughter is. I don't think it's actually great for
our health. Because of the sin world, our bodies changed.
We need things we didn't need in the garden, but
not processed foods. At what point does it become so
disconcerting that a guy like Bill Gates will compare a
discussion about a medicine to inciting violence, because that's what
he did when the violence is economic violence aimed at
the big big bet, and the big bet is viewing
our bodies as code code that needs apps. We're an
uninstalled user base, and Bill Gates wants to install stuff
on that user base. John Kerry is very similar to
Bill Gates. John Kerry has a similar view in regard
to free speech as.
Speaker 6: Bill Gates, and I think the dislike of and anguish
over social media is just growing and growing and growing.
Speaker 1: As a pause, anguish anguish. I know some parents who
are anguished that they ever give their kids access to
social media, but anguish. Who is experiencing anguish? He is,
Bill Gates is because, as he's going to make the
case here, it used to be that you use the
power of government and pr to go to news producers.
And at one time in this country there were three
producers of news who mattered three people. Back in the
day of TV dominance, and if you don't understand TV
domainits think of this. There was an old program called
I Love Lucy or The Beverly Hill Billies is a
great example. When the Beverly Hill Belliefs was on TV,
eighty four percent of people who had TVs were watching it.
Eighty four percent. You're lucky to get six percent of
people with TVs watching anything. And in terms of nightly news,
you had some sixty sixty four percent of Americans with
TVs tuned into three channels. So you had them and
some newspaper editors and that's all that mattered. You have
the Associated Press, you have their opinion writers, you have
the new York Times and you have three producers of
three news shows, and all you needed to do was
give them special favors. You'll get access to Secretary Kerry,
you'll get access to this trip. We'll give you these
sweet CIA headlines that you can write. Sometimes they are
prepackaged news stories, and you can look like you found
this information out in your own All we need you
to do is say that this is true, but it's
not true, yeah, but we need it to be. So
when John Carey's talking about anguish over social media, think
of that word. That's a big word, even for a
guy who's not that gifted, and tell it or intellectually.
Speaker 6: Part of our problem, particularly in democracies, in terms of
building consensus around any issue, it's really hard to govern today.
You can't you know, you know, there's no the referees
we used to have to determine what's the fact and
what is in the fact that kind of been eviscerated
to a certain degree, and people go and that people
self select where they go for their news or for
their information, and then you just get into a vicious cycle.
So it's really really hard, much harder to build consensus
today than at any time in the forty five fifty
years I've been involved in this, and you know, there's
a lot of discussion now about how you curb those
entities in order to guarantee you that you're going to have,
you know, some accountability of facts, et cetera. But look,
if people go to only one source and the source
they go to is sick and you know, as an agenda,
and they're putting out disinformation, our First Amendment stands as
a major block to the ability to be able to
just you know, hammer it out of existence.
Speaker 1: So hammer it's out of existence. Hammer your opinion out
of existence, Hammer what you say out of existence, Hammer
your conscience out of existence. The easiest one to reach for,
of course, is this that there has never been the case.
It has never been the case that a man is
a woman.
Speaker 7: Or this.
Speaker 1: Since we talked about nutrition, it was never the case
that the human body was designed to eat grains in
the amount that would take on a daily basis, on
a day le basis that would take you months of
labor to achieve. It used to be that in the
days of processing grains manually, you're talking months, at what
weeks maybe months of labor to produce something like a
really really really refined flower in amounts that would matter
to you, in amounts where you could eat bread every
single day and cakes every single day, particularly if you
weren't someone who sourced your own grains. It was never
the case that our body was designed for that to
have these things as staples because it's hard to get to.
Barley is hard to eat. I used to eat handfuls
of barley seed, and I love that. That's much more
the way we were designed to eat. But the government
came along and said, here's the food pyramid, this is
how you should eat. It was never true, and you
can track obesd rates and heart disease back to that.
But the government blasted that through those media entities. The
food Pyramid. It's going into all the school books, all
the textbooks. There were cartoons about the food pyramid. Do
you remember the cartoons about the food pyramid that came
from one source, that came from the United States Department
of Agriculture. How did they decide when into the food pyramid?
By lobbying the grain lobbies and the fruit lobbies. They
had huge lobbying groups, the cheese lobbies, they had huge
lobbying groups so they built this. They used one source
government to push it through five to seven producers and
some editorial writers and the AP and then into textbooks
and boom. You have a generation of people, multiple generations
of people whose bodies were destroyed by this. And John
Carey says there's anguish over social media where you can
watch people who have changed their lives by changing their
bodies and then changing their bodies and changing their lives.
Sometimes they've maturely changed lives of others. There are people
who seek to do that. My friend Steve was told
by his doctors, you have a degenerative disease and there
is no cure. You're just going to have to slowly,
slowly sink into physical disorder and eventually now you're not
going to be able to dance with your beloved wife, Kelly.
Funny thing. I was in Mexico with Steve and Kelly
about six months ago, and Kelly was talking about the
fact that she loved to dance. We're there with some
of the members of the podcast family, etc. And Steve
is kind of have to take us out to dinner
in this beautiful place in downtown Portavarta, and Kelly was
talking about dancing, And I just said to Steve, is
a dare. I said, you should dance with your wife
right now. You just think I won't, So I'll do
it right now. And you know what, I have video
of that that I sent them. I should have pulled
that up. So they dance right in the middle of
this restaurant. In fact, the violin players came over and
played for them. This was a guy. This was not
supposed to happen. He'd been told, you have a debilitated disease.
Now he is a quant a mathematician, so he started
to do some research on the data the survivability of this,
and in this process he found a place in Saudi
Arabia that could treat him in a way that America couldn't.
He went and got some of the first generations of
ethically gathered stem cells nothing to do with abortions ever,
placentus in umbilical cords. And guess what, that prognosis turned
out to be wrong, if not a lie. So Steve
used his wealth and his knowledge on how to form
businesses and started in port of our New Mexico renew
healthcare based upon what happened to Kim. I'm here to
tell you that I recovered from surgery shoulder surgery forty
eight times to fifty times faster because of the stem
cells amazing ability to fight information and to build back
muscle and tendon and cartilage. If you are like Steve
and people have told you end of the line, don't
believe it, go right now to renew r E n
U E dot Healthcare. It's renew dot Healthcare. Tell them
you're a member of the Todd Hermann Show family be
It podcast YouTube radio show, and they will take really
good care of you. They'll tell you if they can
help and how. It's renew dot Healthcare. John Kerrey is
very similar to Bill Gates and that he's feeling some anguish,
anguish about social media, anguish that they can no longer
with one phone call shift the opinion of a third
of the country, if not half, or control it.
Speaker 2: See.
Speaker 1: This is an aspect of free speech and censorship that
most people don't understand. When you ban the discussion of
an idea and you make it weird, it's misinformation, it's racism,
it's a conspiracy theory. For a lot of us, that
doesn't matter. We don't care what the government says about us.
We're going to speak our minds, but for other people
it does matter, they won't say it. They're the same
people who sit in the midst of a broken family
reunion and act like they love everybody. We can be cordial,
we can be loving to the people we love. I
was just at a family reader, and I'm well aware
that there were people there who don't particularly like me,
so I didn't impress myself upon him. I went and
shook their hands and said, I'm so glad you well,
And if they'd wanted to speak to me more, they
would have. That's okay, it's honest. They don't want honesty.
Hillary Clinton is another example of the war against the
First Amendments.
Speaker 8: And boosting Trump back in twenty sixteen. But I also
think there are Americans who are engaged in this kind
of propaganda, and whether they should be civilly or even
in some cases criminally charged, is something that would be
a better deterrence.
Speaker 1: Because she says in some cases criminally charged. Guess what,
She's probably very gleeful and was probably instrumental in seeing
Douglas Mackie criminally charged. Remember him, He's the guy who
simply retweeted a meme that said that you could vote
for Hillary Clinton via text. That's all he did. But
they called it sarcastic terrorism. What is that? That's a
post civil war law designed to prosecute members of the
KKK who threatened black people away from polling locations. Sarcastic terrorism,
and he may well go to prison. He's on appeal
right now. Hillary Clinton spoke of there are some Americans
who engage in propaganda. She gathered political donations from big
donors and small donors. She hired a disgraced, utterly disgraced
law firm, Perkins Cooy Perkins Cooy. According to media reports
from well countless media sources. Do I really need to
count them? Politico, New York Times, he'll finally admitted all
this happened that Perkins Coohy effectively said, you know what,
run your opposition research through us. Either Hillary sedit or
they did or they agreed to do it, just according
to these media reports, and they said, just funnel through us.
That way, we're reflected as legal services. No one needs
to know that you're paying a dirty, rotten lying company
like Fusion GPS. My opinion, they're dirty, rotten lying, they're
journalists for hire who don't really create journalism. They create
literal propaganda. Hillary Clinton had that created. In my opinion,
the money was laundered through Perkins Cooey. Then they took
that report, they gave it to people like John McCain
who hated Donald Trump. That was merchandised, then up into
the FBI and was born an international statement of truth.
Donald Trump works for Vladimir Putin. Everybody knows it. It's
clear there was a multi million dollar, if not a
billion dollar investigation on this. They didn't find a single
thing to make a single shred of truth out of
those claims. They lied to the pis of court, they
lied to the American people. They committed perjury, and none
of them went to jail. Douglas Mackie might go to
prison for retweeting a meme I was in prison, and
who did not visit me? Lord Jesus, as you treat
the least of these, so you treat me, do not
lord your power over others. That's from at their Bible
in the beginning was the word. The word was with God.
The word was God. God is truth. When Hillary Clinton
declares war against the First Amendment, she's declaring war against
the truth. It's not just in America. There is a
shocking video that comes from none other than the Treasurer
of Australia. I play for you in a second. But
Hillary Clinton has been busily claiming that Kamala Harris, Kamala Harris,
I'll never get it right, that she'll be a great president,
that there's enthusiasm for her, and it's all very organic,
very very organic enthusiasm for Kamala Harris. Well, you know
where she stands on the topic of free speech.
Speaker 7: He has lost his privileges and it should be taken down.
And the bottom line is that you can't say that
you have one rule for Facebook and you have a
different rule for Twitter. The same rule has to apply,
which is that there has to be a responsibility that
is placed on these social media sites to understand their power.
They are directly speaking to millions and millions of people
without any level of oversight or regulation, and that has
to stop.
Speaker 1: They are speaking to the American people without any measure
of oversight or regulation, and that needs to stop. Let's
pause for a moment. Should there be regulation and oversight
when you and I speak together, I mean, yeah, on
the podcast. But let's remove it. Let's say that we
did another live event and the one we did what
we did in Seattle when we weren't st when I
wasn't stupid doing it in a Friday night when there
was a University of Washington game and a Seahawks game.
We did about three thousand people show up. It was cool,
very humbly. That's three thousand people. I mean, shouldn't there
be regulation an oversight in a setting like that where
I get to say whatever I want? I mean, people
could leave and go tell ten friends. In fact, I
think I told people leave and go tell ten friends.
That would be thirty thousand people. And if they told
ten friends, now you're talking about a lot more, what
three hundred thousand people? So why is it that they
want to do this with tech? Because they can, and
because they want to get back to the day of
the uniphone, the uniparty's megaphone, the uniphone, where they can
form opinions and enforce them through social pressure. And this
is a global thing. I can't believe the Treasurer of Australia.
You want to see what he thinks should be punished speech.
He shouldn't think should be allowed. It has to do
with economics. Let's share that with you in a second.
There is something that I think of as the economics
of morality, where we can, we should choose to purchase
products from companies that back our morality, that back our
play in terms of viewing people as objects not to
be manipulated, but as in fact people created by God,
loved by Him. And there's a company that does that
with a product you're going to need for the rest
of your life. It's soap, and it's so simple. Let's
just make this a simple equation. The company from which
you buy soap now or companies probably include chemicals in
what they make. Alan Soaps does not. It's all natural.
They probably make their soap overseas, probably in China or India,
probably in the case in China, involving slave labor. They
ship that over here with unnatural ingredients made by the
hands of slave labor. You use it to wash your body.
They give money to CAUs as you don't support, and
starve causes you do supports, and it ends there. It's
all aboutfit. But there's also a morality to business. Alan
Soaps is a moral business because they have a mission
greater than simply profits, and they want profits. They have
to to beginue to operate in John, who runs Alan
Soaps as a businessman. The company is named after his son, Alan,
who works there every day diligently. When he's not inventing
fragrances of soaps, he's packaging them. So why because the
rest of the world won't hire him, Sorry, they won't.
Alan's a brilliant kid, but he's nonverbal because of autism,
and he walks in unique ways because there's some very
difficult physical challenges that have led to eighteen operations. It's
not a SOB story at all. If it was a
SOB story, it would be the Allen Foundation. This is
about buying soap from a company that gets it made
in America by family of three generations of soap making expertise.
And it's also this It was one person working there,
now it's two, also with autism, and three late onset
autism happened to a young woman who now works at
Alan Sobs proudly and happily. So decide it's a simpler question.
Alan Soaps dot Com slash tied to get Temper sent
off all the products or continue to have the stuff
shipped in from China, Alan Soaps, dot Com, slash Tide.
It's not quote just things like election integrity. It's not
things like medicines. It's also economics. We should be limited
as to what we say about economic policy. This is
the treasure of Australia. Jim Chalmers.
Speaker 9: We think misinformation and disinformation is a big threat to
people's safety and to our society and to our economy
as well, and we want to hold the big tech
platforms to account. And the steps that we are taking
when it comes to misinformation and disinformation are about protecting
and cherishing and advancing free speech, not censoring it.
Speaker 1: We're going to cherish in advance free speech by outlawing it,
by outlawing it, because we can't have you going around
in saying things about say a central bank digital currency.
We can't have you saying but wait a minute, if
you get a central bank digital currency and we no
longer have cash, then the government can stop us from
buying food. If they don't like what we say, well,
that's a threat to democracy. No, I mean not the
central bank digital currency. It's a threat to democracy for
you to talk about the central bank digital currency that's
going to end democracy. Didn't the Bible warn us about
something like that? By Gully? I think it did. It
will not be either to buy nor sell. That's somewhere
in the Bible. You know, it's just in the Bible.
God wins. So let's stand on the side of this
victorious as victors. This is the Todd Herman Show. Please go,
be well, be strong, be kind, Please make every effort
to walk in the word. Light shines in the darkness,
and the darkness has not overcome it.