Speaker 1: Well, welcome back, and our guest is Alex Newman, Senior
Speaker 1: editor of The New American, award winning international journalist, educator, author, speaker,
Speaker 1: nationally syndicated radio host, and consultant. He's an award winning
Speaker 1: international journalist, educator, and consultant. So we've had him on
Speaker 1: many times, talking mainly about education, but we always get
Speaker 1: him on every year he goes to wherever they have
Speaker 1: these cop things. We're now up to number thirty and
Speaker 1: this time we covered the road that they were building
Speaker 1: for the elites to go down and cutting down massive
Speaker 1: numbers of trees. I don't know what was it, one
Speaker 1: hundred thousand, Alex, what'd they cut down with those trees?
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's the number I heard as well.
Speaker 3: Yep.
Speaker 1: But now you know, these people are constantly flipping their story.
Speaker 1: And it used to be that trees were our salvation
Speaker 1: and you would pay an indulgence to pollute so they
Speaker 1: could plant tree somewhere. But now Bill Gates wants all
Speaker 1: the trees cut down, not used for anything, but buried
Speaker 1: in the ground because they're going to release all that
Speaker 1: carbon that they have absorbed. This is the most insane
Speaker 1: thing I've ever seen. But there's a lot of insanity
Speaker 1: with that. Did you get to go down that road?
Speaker 4: Well, we wasn't ready yet, so nobody was able to
Speaker 4: go down it, except you know, the machinery that was
Speaker 4: building it.
Speaker 2: But it was quite the story, you know.
Speaker 4: They literally cut down an enormous swath of the rainforest
Speaker 4: protected Virgin rainforests, was supposed to be untouchable, and they
Speaker 4: decided that, hey, we've got a climate summit coming in
Speaker 4: the city's not very nice. The traffic's horrendous, so why
Speaker 4: don't we build these people some nice new roads so
Speaker 4: they don't have to mingle with the riff raff and
Speaker 4: wait in the traffic like the rest of the suckers.
Speaker 2: And unfortunately for the suckers.
Speaker 4: They actually didn't finish the road in time for the
Speaker 4: climate something which is very typical of the socialist powers.
Speaker 3: That's right, So that's our salvation.
Speaker 1: These people can't build anything, not even a road, in
Speaker 1: time all of this for the bent and then they
Speaker 1: missed the time window.
Speaker 2: There, so they have very embarrassed about it. David.
Speaker 4: They actually put out military and police to try to
Speaker 4: guard this so people couldn't get to it.
Speaker 2: We rented a car.
Speaker 4: And we snuck through the rainforest in the middle of
Speaker 4: the night, very very late, so that we would be
Speaker 4: able to get through there. We actually had to go
Speaker 4: all the way out past where there's cell service, passed
Speaker 4: where there was even a GPS reception, which I don't
Speaker 4: even know how that works, but we did finally find it,
Speaker 4: and we found one of the local residents that lived
Speaker 4: in the jungle, and he was very upset. He said,
Speaker 4: we don't need this stupid road. What we need is
Speaker 4: water and electricity. Please, Yeah, we need water and electricity.
Speaker 4: But they're building AI data centers.
Speaker 1: That's what we get over here about because now they
Speaker 1: don't care about energy usage or heat generated as long
Speaker 1: as it's for AI, because that's going to give them
Speaker 1: their control over us.
Speaker 3: But tell us what else you saw there?
Speaker 1: I mean a lot of people are saying after Bill
Speaker 1: Gates moved back, they're saying, well, you know, this is it.
Speaker 1: The people have basically played out all their lies and
Speaker 1: they're on the run. Do you see that or does
Speaker 1: it look like these people are going to still keep coming.
Speaker 1: I think they're going to keep coming. What do you think?
Speaker 4: No question about it, David. I was going to say
Speaker 4: that all of this reporting we even saw some of
Speaker 4: it in the fake media. Oh, the climate thing was
Speaker 4: a failure. Nothing to see here. Go back to your
Speaker 4: regularly scheduled football games. There's nothing to worry about.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 2: Bill Gates says it's over right. And I think Bill
Speaker 2: Gates just made a strategic decision.
Speaker 4: Like you said, he needs AI data centers to enslave
Speaker 4: humanity more than he needs the climate.
Speaker 2: Hoax at this particular moment.
Speaker 4: But the idea that they're going to give up the
Speaker 4: climate hoax is utterly ludicrous. They actually did get an
Speaker 4: agreement this year. You know, the Trump administration boycotted it.
Speaker 4: State Department told us it was because they the conference
Speaker 4: was designed to bankrupt the United States and we weren't
Speaker 4: going to participate. But there was a lot in the
Speaker 4: final agreement, David. One of the things that got in
Speaker 4: there was the carbon budget for humanity. Turns out there
Speaker 4: is a carbon budget that we can be allowed to admit.
Speaker 2: And this this is crazy, David. They got this in
Speaker 2: the final tax agree to by government in the world.
Speaker 4: We've already gone through four fifths of it, and most
Speaker 4: of that has come from the United States and Europe
Speaker 4: and the West.
Speaker 2: And so what's left.
Speaker 4: The one fifth of the carbon budget that we still
Speaker 4: have left needs to be allocated to the mass murderny
Speaker 4: dictatorship in communist China and the Indian government and the
Speaker 4: Brazilians and the South Africans and so on. So the
Speaker 4: biggest that's right, and prepared to have your CO two
Speaker 4: emissions rationed slaves because that's coming down the pike. They
Speaker 4: got the infrastructure in there to eventually create the enforcement
Speaker 4: mechan They went into this with the Marxists would be
Speaker 4: dictator of Brazil Lula saying that he wanted to create
Speaker 4: an enforcement body.
Speaker 2: He was calling it the Global Environmental Council.
Speaker 4: They didn't get that, but they got all of the
Speaker 4: metrics and tools and monitoring frameworks that they'll need to
Speaker 4: be able to get that going forward. So that was
Speaker 4: big progress and there was also a lot of side agreements. David,
Speaker 4: a whole bunch of US allies got together and signed
Speaker 4: a Declaration on Information Integrity, basically promising to work together
Speaker 4: to censor US. They got more than half of the
Speaker 4: governments agreed to create a fossil fuel phase out road map,
Speaker 4: so that were having the first meeting for that in
Speaker 4: Columbia in April and then for me, one of the
Speaker 4: biggest takeaways David, it always is and nobody ever pays
Speaker 4: attention to this is the religious angle.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 4: This conference to me was the place where it was
Speaker 4: most clear. And I've been going to these for fifteen years.
Speaker 4: We're watching here an attempt to repaganize the world. Basically,
Speaker 4: the paradigm, David is Christianity is to blame for the
Speaker 4: environmental and ecological catastrophe, because Christianity holds that man has
Speaker 4: made in the image of God, that the planet is
Speaker 4: here for our benefit, that we are calling Genesis to
Speaker 4: take dominion of the planet and its animals and things
Speaker 4: like this for our benefit and for the glory of God.
Speaker 4: That's the reason why mother Earth is suffering so much.
Speaker 4: And so they paraded, I mean literally an endless parade
Speaker 4: of Native American pagans, you know, go a lot of
Speaker 4: them from the rainforest. That's why they held it in
Speaker 4: the rainforest. Who came to enlighten all the delegates about
Speaker 4: how Mother Earth is angry at us for our co
Speaker 4: two emations, and we need to go back to appeasing
Speaker 4: the forest spirits and the river spirits and the rock spirits.
Speaker 4: And we do that by basically repaganizing the world and
Speaker 4: cleansing it of Christian civilization.
Speaker 2: So this was a very, very very.
Speaker 4: Significant motif throughout this conference, and I think it's one
Speaker 4: of the big takeaways.
Speaker 1: You know, it's been that way for a while, and
Speaker 1: we've had again they're making it, you know, keep propagating this,
Speaker 1: but we've had bits and pieces of this. Remember Jennifer Warrance,
Speaker 1: the actress, was very serious about Mother Earth being upset
Speaker 1: with us though you know, we had some natural disasters
Speaker 1: or something like that. They take that very seriously. The
Speaker 1: Gaia theory that was done by James Lovelock. I remember
Speaker 1: we were in the UK in two thousand and one
Speaker 1: and it was everywhere. It was you know, science magazines
Speaker 1: that we saw left behind on the train from people.
Speaker 1: It was all over the and I took the kids
Speaker 1: to a children's museum and they had this loop plane
Speaker 1: that was saying that, you know, guy, a mother Earth
Speaker 1: is this sentient being and that humans are like a virus,
Speaker 1: and so therefore we need to be exterminated, right, and
Speaker 1: so that type of thing has been going for quite
Speaker 1: some time. Not interestingly enough, Lovelock, who came up with
Speaker 1: that analogy based on pagan religion. Guy a mother Earth.
Speaker 1: He has now moved back away from that, he's now
Speaker 1: recanted that. But these people are doubling down and going
Speaker 1: on with it. And it is a religion and they
Speaker 1: pursue it religiously. You know, that is the worldview in
Speaker 1: which they frame everything.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: I think, Alex, I think what is going on the
Speaker 1: way it might take on all this. I want to
Speaker 1: see what you think about this. I think one of
Speaker 1: the reasons that they're pulling back on this is because
Speaker 1: they've got to get the infrastructure in with AI and
Speaker 1: they've got to get the infrastructure in with digital money,
Speaker 1: you know, not CBDC, but they'll be doing it through
Speaker 1: through stable coins that'll give them the same kind of
Speaker 1: control and you know, being able to observe everything that
Speaker 1: we do and control and prevent us from making certain transactions.
Speaker 1: I think they've got to get that infrastructure in and
Speaker 1: so they're going to wait and do that and then
Speaker 1: they will roll in the come back to the population
Speaker 1: control stuff, and it is population control in every aspect
Speaker 1: of it, making sure they don't have as many people.
Speaker 1: But then the people that are there, they want to
Speaker 1: control every aspect of our life. What do you think
Speaker 1: about that? Did you see stuff there about Sea forty
Speaker 1: for example, you know the thing that was put together
Speaker 1: by City Khan and Bloomberg. When I saw all the
Speaker 1: angst about Mom Danny and I thought, well, we've already
Speaker 1: had a Muslim mayor and a communist in London and
Speaker 1: New York putting out this prescription for how they're going
Speaker 1: to ration our lives to us. They call it Sea
Speaker 1: forty Initiative. So I didn't really see that anything was
Speaker 1: different about that. But what do you think? What do
Speaker 1: you think in terms of why they have stepped back
Speaker 1: away from this climate mcguffin and I think they're going
Speaker 1: to step back into it once they get these tools
Speaker 1: in place.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 4: My take, David is that they realize that the bitter
Speaker 4: cleaners in America are not going for it. You know,
Speaker 4: they've done the polling. I've seen the polling results. They
Speaker 4: know the majority of Americans don't even believe that human
Speaker 4: activity is responsible for climate change. And then when you
Speaker 4: drill down even further, even the people who do believe,
Speaker 4: even the kool aid drinkers, don't care enough to actually
Speaker 4: do anything. There was an interesting poll by ap North
Speaker 4: Center for Public Affairs, less than one third of Americans
Speaker 4: were willing to pay one single solitary US dollar on
Speaker 4: their monthly electric bill climate change. Okay, that's how little
Speaker 4: Americans care, even tho ones who are dumb enough to
Speaker 4: fall for this. So their strategy was really clear to me, David.
Speaker 4: They're working through a variety of institutions, but education is
Speaker 4: one of the critical ones. UNESCO had a big, big,
Speaker 4: big event there. They called it Greening Education. They partnered
Speaker 4: with the Marxist Brazilian government and the OECD, and they
Speaker 4: talked about how we are going to brainwash the children
Speaker 4: in every single country to believe this, and it's not
Speaker 4: going to be optional. Right, You're going to include it
Speaker 4: in your Nationally Determined Contributions, your NDCs that you got
Speaker 4: to update every five years. Under Paris, they're going to
Speaker 4: be including what they call climate literacy on the International
Speaker 4: Standardized Assessments.
Speaker 2: The PISA as it's called PISA.
Speaker 4: And so basically, if your government isn't brainwashing the little
Speaker 4: ones to believe that we're all doing from climate change
Speaker 4: and that they need to become climate activists, you're going
Speaker 4: to look stupid.
Speaker 2: Right when you come out on these international assessments.
Speaker 4: So they were saying this openly the top officials at UNASCO,
Speaker 4: the UN Education Agency.
Speaker 2: So I think that's their plan.
Speaker 4: You're right, the data centers and the AI is a
Speaker 4: critical component of this. They can't restructure the whole economy
Speaker 4: around carbon credits and your carbon footprint until they've got
Speaker 4: the computing power and the data to go with the
Speaker 4: computing power that makes this all trackable, and then you've
Speaker 4: got to combine it with the social credit scores. So
Speaker 4: you're right, the AI and the data centers are a
Speaker 4: precursor to the ultimate flip. But they are one hundred
Speaker 4: percent committed to this. I think the only reason it
Speaker 4: wasn't covered in the American media is because they now know.
Speaker 4: The more we talk about this, the more angry Americans get,
Speaker 4: the more likely they are to call their congressmen and
Speaker 4: demand into all this foolishness. So I think that's where
Speaker 4: they're going. But you know, to go back to the
Speaker 4: religion thing for a moment. The first time I saw
Speaker 4: the paganism, I was just a young whipper snapper journalist
Speaker 4: fresh out of journalism school.
Speaker 2: It was in Cancun.
Speaker 4: The head of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change
Speaker 4: in case down if you get is opened up with
Speaker 4: a prayer to each jail, whom she described as the
Speaker 4: goddess of tapestries and creativity.
Speaker 2: So you know, I'm dead serious. She opens up and says,
Speaker 2: we need a prayer.
Speaker 4: To each shell that she'll give us the wisdom and
Speaker 4: creativity to create a creative tapestry of climate solutions for
Speaker 4: this crisis whatever.
Speaker 2: So I whip out my laptop and look up this
Speaker 2: each shell and she's the goddess of cannibalism and war
Speaker 2: and human sacrifice.
Speaker 3: Oh it was not just basket weaving, right it prayer.
Speaker 4: We've got to get rid of the disease on this planet,
Speaker 4: which is humanity. And so you know they've been set
Speaker 4: back by the fact that nobody believes them. But they're
Speaker 4: going to go for our kids, They're going to go
Speaker 4: for our churches, and they will be back with a
Speaker 4: vengeance as soon as enough of the older population dies
Speaker 4: off and they've got enough of the younger dupes ready
Speaker 4: to move into positions of power.
Speaker 3: I agree you're talking about the OECD.
Speaker 1: It's almost like inserting education in the e of education,
Speaker 1: inserting that in the OCD obsessive compulsive disorder, because that's
Speaker 1: what they have done with the kids, and they can
Speaker 1: get a sizable percentage of kids if we start them
Speaker 1: from an early age, can brainwash them into this stuff.
Speaker 1: That's why they had that guy of video running in
Speaker 1: the children's museum. But you know, when you talk about
Speaker 1: the religious side of it, I remember Pope Francis when
Speaker 1: he was first first getting in this. One of the
Speaker 1: first things he did was a climate encyclical, and then
Speaker 1: he got people upset with him because he had that
Speaker 1: Pakemama thing from Amazon. I remember some people then threw
Speaker 1: it in the river there near the Vatican. But so
Speaker 1: was pake Omama. Was that featured in this particular one
Speaker 1: in Brazil.
Speaker 4: I didn't see Pacamama, but I didn't watch the papacy
Speaker 4: very closely because you know, Francis has now gone on
Speaker 4: to eternity.
Speaker 2: I don't know what that looks like for him, but
Speaker 2: he the new guy.
Speaker 4: I was like, well, let's see, is he going to
Speaker 4: continue the environmental crusade, the environmental holy war? And sure
Speaker 4: enough he doubled down on it. I mean before the conference,
Speaker 4: I'm sure he saw the video of him blessing this
Speaker 4: big block of ice. Might have been the weirdest ceremony
Speaker 4: I ever saw, except for the.
Speaker 2: Pagamama, I think. But then he releases this.
Speaker 4: He's got the biggest delegation ever at a climate center.
Speaker 4: All these cardinals and bishops and the Secretary of State
Speaker 4: gave the big opening speech on his behalf and he
Speaker 4: produced a video and I mean, people should watch.
Speaker 2: It was only like two and a half minutes.
Speaker 4: He's like, to the religious people gathered in the Amazon
Speaker 4: to save the climate, you know, keep it up, but
Speaker 4: we can't just have hope, you know, now we got
Speaker 4: to have action and really really blatant collaboration with paganism.
Speaker 2: And you also had the Muslims there, which was really
Speaker 2: interesting too.
Speaker 4: You had one Muslim leader lecturing everybody about how Mohammed
Speaker 4: was really a great environmentalist because this one time he
Speaker 4: said we shouldn't drink all our water, we should conserve resources.
Speaker 2: And clearly he was a climate activist. You know, even
Speaker 2: had a word for it. I forget what the word
Speaker 2: was in Arabic.
Speaker 4: But they're bringing all the religions of the world, and
Speaker 4: I say religions of the world in you know, the evangelical,
Speaker 4: biblical sense and all the religions of the world are
Speaker 4: uniting behind this climate foolishness. And you had organizations purporting
Speaker 4: to represent over one hundred Christian denominations there a lot
Speaker 4: of them led of course by the Vatican.
Speaker 2: But this is dead serious and Americans aren't seeing it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they talk about climate justice and things like that,
Speaker 1: and yeah, it is amazing. And so that's all alive
Speaker 1: and wealth still with a religious people, and it's becoming,
Speaker 1: as you point out, kind of a world religion where
Speaker 1: they can pull them all in. I wonder if it
Speaker 1: never occurred to anybody that maybe Mohammad was saying about
Speaker 1: conserving water was because they're in the middle of the desert.
Speaker 2: Right, yeah, yeah, yeah, absolutely. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So what is the status with the Paris Climate Accord?
Speaker 1: I have talked about this over and over again. I
Speaker 1: was so disappointed because in many regards, even the first
Speaker 1: Trump administration, there was some very positive stuff in terms
Speaker 1: of pushing back against some radical environmentalism, and of course
Speaker 1: we've seen some good moves in this one as well
Speaker 1: for whatever reason, but one thing that they did not
Speaker 1: do was to just say that the Climate Accord was
Speaker 1: null and void. And it was null and void because
Speaker 1: you remember it was John Kerry who said, yeah, Obama
Speaker 1: and I just self ratified at ourselves and and so,
Speaker 1: and I say the Republicans are just as guilty of
Speaker 1: this as the Democrats are because I remember had I
Speaker 1: can't remember his name now. He had somebody that I'd
Speaker 1: worked with before in terms of climate stuff, and he said,
Speaker 1: what needs to happen is the Republican Senate needs to
Speaker 1: come in and say we're going to have a vote
Speaker 1: on this presumed treaty.
Speaker 3: We're going to put it up for a vote.
Speaker 1: There's no way that it was going to get the
Speaker 1: sixty percent votes that it needed, so they needed to
Speaker 1: do that, and so they could shut it down, but
Speaker 1: they never did. And the fact that there was never
Speaker 1: a single Republican that pointed that out, that said this
Speaker 1: is a bogus, bogus treaty. It is null and void,
Speaker 1: it has no effect. And then throughout the entire Trump administration,
Speaker 1: they pretended that they couldn't get out of it because
Speaker 1: I think it was deliberately put in saying if you
Speaker 1: want to get out, you got to wait four years,
Speaker 1: knowing that that's the term of the American president. So
Speaker 1: this time they say well, okay, he got out, and
Speaker 1: then Biden puts us back in immediately, again violating the
Speaker 1: idea of treaties. And then when Trump gets in, now
Speaker 1: he's going to get out, but since it's the second time,
Speaker 1: he's getting out now. According to the treaty, only has
Speaker 1: to wait one year, but we're waiting that year to
Speaker 1: get out. Have you seen that. Has a Trump administration
Speaker 1: ignored these principles? Have they done anything to violate the
Speaker 1: Climate Agreement or are they still complying with it for
Speaker 1: this year?
Speaker 4: Yeah, So this is a really important subject, David, and
Speaker 4: I'm going to try to break it down.
Speaker 2: As simply as possible.
Speaker 4: They make it needlessly complicated so that normal people and
Speaker 4: even people who follow these things closely can't understand it.
Speaker 4: So there's an underlying treaty. This was approved back in
Speaker 4: nineteen ninety two. It came out of the Earth Summit
Speaker 4: that was held in Rio de Janeiro in nineteen ninety two.
Speaker 2: George HW.
Speaker 4: Bush signed it on behalf of America, and that's where
Speaker 4: we got the Earth Charter, that's where we got the
Speaker 4: Agenda twenty one. But we got this nineteen ninety two
Speaker 4: treaty that was called the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change,
Speaker 4: which is very confusing because that's also the name of
Speaker 4: the bureaucracy that's in charge of implementing the treaty. So
Speaker 4: every year these climate summits are hosted by the UNF
Speaker 4: Triple C. It's headquartered in Bonn, Germany. And that treaty was,
Speaker 4: at least according to the Congressional record, ratified by the
Speaker 4: US Senate. I've heard some legitimate questions about the rat
Speaker 4: whether the ratification was legitimate. But in nineteen ninety two,
Speaker 4: the US Senate officially ratified this monstrous treaty that George
Speaker 4: hw Bush, mister New World Order signed, And so each
Speaker 4: year they hold these annual climates. This was the thirtieth one,
Speaker 4: as you pointed out, the cop thirty. And each year
Speaker 4: they come up with a new agreement, and each year
Speaker 4: they like to pretend like they're just going to tack
Speaker 4: that onto the back of the nineteen ninety two treaty.
Speaker 2: And so we don't need the Senate to look at
Speaker 2: this again. It's just part of the UN Framework Convention
Speaker 2: on Climate Change, right, because this is the mechanism that
Speaker 2: they set up.
Speaker 4: And so every year comes and they try to take
Speaker 4: at least one giant leap forward on the climate scam,
Speaker 4: whether it's you know, set up a carbon market, set
Speaker 4: up a loss and damage fund. Have the United States
Speaker 4: plead guilty for causing the climate crisis, so each year
Speaker 4: they take a big new jump into usurping more power,
Speaker 4: et cetera. Now, the Paris Agreement was one of these
Speaker 4: supplemental agreements. They did not treat it like a treaty.
Speaker 4: They treat it as just an addendum to the nineteen
Speaker 4: ninety two treaty.
Speaker 2: So here's where we're at now.
Speaker 4: And I've talked to a lot of people in the
Speaker 4: Trump administration about this, including at State, including at EPA,
Speaker 4: to try to get a handle on what's going on.
Speaker 4: And I'm told by multiple people who are very well informed,
Speaker 4: people who were very much involved in getting us out
Speaker 4: of the Paris Agreement the first time, that there are
Speaker 4: now discussions about the possibility of withdrawing from the UNF
Speaker 4: Triple C. That would be, as far as I'm concerned,
Speaker 4: checkmate for the climate cult at least as far as
Speaker 4: the United States is concerned.
Speaker 2: But here's the kicker. We're not out of the UNF
Speaker 2: Triple C.
Speaker 4: So we're down in Brazil at this UN Climate Summit,
Speaker 4: and you've got some of the top globalist puppets at
Speaker 4: this summit, like Pstana Figueta Soo I mentioned earlier, former
Speaker 4: Executive Secretary of the UNF Triple C say, it's great
Speaker 4: that Trump didn't come. You know, his administration would have
Speaker 4: just been a big obstacle.
Speaker 2: They would have been a big roadblock.
Speaker 4: We might not have even been able to pass these
Speaker 4: agreements by consensus, which is what they do. And so frankly,
Speaker 4: it's fantastic that Trump is not here. You had Gene Sue,
Speaker 4: a very prominent legal mind on this right now with
Speaker 4: the Center for Biological Diversity, but she'll almost certainly work
Speaker 4: for the next Democrat regime when they get the White
Speaker 4: House again, says, hey, this is fantastic that the Trump
Speaker 4: administration didn't send anybody. We're going to pass a super
Speaker 4: ambitious agreement. And then the US is still in the
Speaker 4: UNF Triple C. So as soon as Trump has gone
Speaker 4: and we get the next president in, this will all
Speaker 4: be binding on the United States and we'll we'll enforce
Speaker 4: it all on the United States.
Speaker 2: So that's essentially the situation right now.
Speaker 4: Trump has his executive order on day one, this was
Speaker 4: January twenty, twenty twenty five. Putting America first in international
Speaker 4: environmental agreements did get us out of Paris.
Speaker 2: It did get us out of all of.
Speaker 4: These subsequent agreements that have been tacked onto the back
Speaker 4: of the nineteen ninety two treaty. But as of right now,
Speaker 4: it's only a temporary measure.
Speaker 2: As soon as we.
Speaker 4: Get a Democrat or a Rhino Republican back in the
Speaker 4: White House, all they got to do is whip out
Speaker 4: their pen say we're back into all of it. And
Speaker 4: that's what they're planning. By the way, that's what Gavin
Speaker 4: Newsom talked about, you know, Gavin Newsom and his hair
Speaker 4: showed up in the Amazon and said that, hey, don't worry,
Speaker 4: we're still in. You know, Trump as an invasive species.
Speaker 4: He's not a permanent fixture of American politics. As soon
Speaker 4: as he's gone, we'll be right back in. And by
Speaker 4: the way, in the meantime, me and most of the
Speaker 4: American population and most of the American economy are still
Speaker 4: part of this. Right California is going to keep implementing
Speaker 4: Paris and all the other ones. They have this coalition,
Speaker 4: it's called we're still in. It's mayors, governors, CEOs, and
Speaker 4: technically they're correct. If you look at their jurisdictions, like
Speaker 4: the state of California, you add them all together, they
Speaker 4: do have most of the American population, most American GDP,
Speaker 4: and they're pretending like we're still in all of these
Speaker 4: subsequent agreements that we're added on to the back of
Speaker 4: the unf tripleC.
Speaker 2: So I know that's super confusing.
Speaker 4: That's where we're at. I just want to add one thing, David.
Speaker 4: I am not a lawyer, but I play one on
Speaker 4: TV NO. But I have read the Constitution, and I
Speaker 4: think anybody is capable of reading the Constitution with a
Speaker 4: third grade level of education and intelligence, you should be
Speaker 4: able to understand this. The Constitution does allow the President
Speaker 4: to sign and the Senate to approve of treaties which
Speaker 4: are binding on the United States of America.
Speaker 2: But there's a big kex that nobody ever talks about.
Speaker 4: And most of the lawyers haven't even read the Constitution,
Speaker 4: so they probably don't even know this. But if you
Speaker 4: go to Article six, where it says that the statutes
Speaker 4: passed by Congress and the treaties are part of the
Speaker 4: Supreme law of the land along with the Constitution. It
Speaker 4: says that they need to be made in pursuance thereof.
Speaker 4: So statutes and treaties that are made in pursuance thereof,
Speaker 4: in other words, that are made constitutionally. Show me where
Speaker 4: the Constitution grants the federal government the power to regulate
Speaker 4: my co two emissions. Show them where it grants me
Speaker 4: them the power to shut down my power plant or
Speaker 4: create new emission standards for my cars.
Speaker 2: Right, they don't have that power.
Speaker 4: If they want that power, they need to go to
Speaker 4: Article five. There's two different options there for passing a
Speaker 4: constitutional amendment. And this has been by the way, very clear,
Speaker 4: very ironclad, from the beginning of our republic. Thomas Jefferson explained,
Speaker 4: if the treaty power is boundless, in other words, if
Speaker 4: they could just grab new powers by signing a treaty,
Speaker 4: there's no point in having a constitution. And we have
Speaker 4: even in nineteen fifty seven, the Supreme Court ruled inn
Speaker 4: Read versus Covert the federal government cannot grant itself new
Speaker 4: powers just by approving the international treaty.
Speaker 3: So it's not far as.
Speaker 4: I'm concerned, the unf Triple C is totally illegitimate. Federal
Speaker 4: government never has those powers, and we need to treat
Speaker 4: it that way. It's a user patient, it's null and void.
Speaker 4: As even Alexander Hamilton said in the Federalist Papers, this
Speaker 4: is a fraud. We have no obligation to obey this thing.
Speaker 1: I absolutely agree with you, and you know I would
Speaker 1: say what they're trying to do with this is kind
Speaker 1: of akin to what they did with the Authorization for
Speaker 1: the Use of Military Force. So we've done this one thing.
Speaker 1: Now we can have wars without having a declaration or
Speaker 1: discussion or vote on it or whatever. So now we
Speaker 1: got into this treaty once back in nineteen ninety two,
Speaker 1: and now we can amend it and extend it, and
Speaker 1: we can do all these different things that are in
Speaker 1: violation of the US Constitution, and we never have to
Speaker 1: go back and relitigate this or reapprove any of these treaties.
Speaker 1: I reject that, just like I reject the Organization for
Speaker 1: the Use of Military Force. But the point that you
Speaker 1: made is that these treaties cannot amend or suspend the
Speaker 1: US Constitution, that is the controlling document. The problem is
Speaker 1: that we've let them get away with us in so
Speaker 1: many different areas, you know, just like we were talking
Speaker 1: about the War on drugs and the way this is extended.
Speaker 1: I honestly, I think alex they called it a war
Speaker 1: on drugs instead of prohibition because they don't want people
Speaker 1: to think, well, wait a minute, and we had prohibition.
Speaker 1: There was a constitutional amendment required for that, with the
Speaker 1: eighteenth Amendment. So they play these games where they just
Speaker 1: assume these powers and then it's up to you to
Speaker 1: stop it, and to somehow stop it using other levers
Speaker 1: of government, as they continue to say that they have
Speaker 1: those powers when they don't really have them. That's the
Speaker 1: whole fraud behind this. But it really is ye, it
Speaker 1: really is about power. It really is about depopulation. I mean,
Speaker 1: I remember when this whole thing started. I was in
Speaker 1: high school when they started had the first Earthday, and
Speaker 1: I remember it was all about depopulation. And my friends
Speaker 1: who bought into all this stuff, they were just constantly
Speaker 1: wringing their hands. There's too many people. There's too many people.
Speaker 1: There's too many and Paul Erlick is out there, how
Speaker 1: do we get rid of people? Well, wars are good,
Speaker 1: but disease is even better, you know, And so we
Speaker 1: need to have all these different ways that we can
Speaker 1: kill people. But the governments look at it and although
Speaker 1: they like to kill people, they like to control the
Speaker 1: people who are still alive as well. And so I
Speaker 1: think it really checks all the boxes for the people
Speaker 1: in power. It gets them exactly what they want. And
Speaker 1: of course it's checked the boxes where a lot of
Speaker 1: people made a lot of money off of this stuff.
Speaker 1: What does it look like they're lining up to do
Speaker 1: now with this some what kind of financial schemes are
Speaker 1: they rolling out.
Speaker 2: On the climate change front?
Speaker 4: Well, a lot of the governments of the world are
Speaker 4: moving ahead of this, ahead on this without us for now, right.
Speaker 4: And the assumption is, as I just explained, they're saying
Speaker 4: this openly. The assumption is that they'll just impose this
Speaker 4: on the United States later. So they've got several really
Speaker 4: significant financial arrangements and they got a lot of these
Speaker 4: into the cop Thirty one point three trillion dollars a
Speaker 4: year is the number that they put in the final agreement,
Speaker 4: agreed to by consensus. By the way, the United States
Speaker 4: wasn't there to object so implicitly, since we're still part
Speaker 4: of the unf Triple C. We agreed to This is
Speaker 4: something nobody wants to talk about, but it's true. One
Speaker 4: point three trillion in well three distribution per year by
Speaker 4: the year twenty thirty five. So we're talking ten years
Speaker 4: from now, they're going to be extracting one point three
Speaker 4: trillion dollars from whatever's left of the American middle class,
Speaker 4: if we still have one, whatever's left of the middle
Speaker 4: class in Europe. That's in addition to a tripling of
Speaker 4: climate adaptation finance, which is basically bribing third world kleptocracies
Speaker 4: to pretend like they're adapting to climate change by putting
Speaker 4: money in their Swiss bank accounts and buying nicer limousines,
Speaker 4: building themselves nicer mansions and things like this.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's exactly rights.
Speaker 4: And so Joe Biden agreed to a loss and damage
Speaker 4: fund him and John Kerrey, where we're going to be
Speaker 4: paying climate reparations.
Speaker 2: I got, apart from all.
Speaker 4: These other things, and a huge development that almost nobody
Speaker 4: in the American media talked about. They're now integrating carbon markets.
Speaker 4: So the European Union and the Marxist Brazilian government came
Speaker 4: up with this big special event.
Speaker 2: They got a new agreement.
Speaker 4: I forget the whole title of it was like open
Speaker 4: carbon market, transparent reform mechanis something where they are bringing
Speaker 4: together the European Union carbon market, the Brazilian carbon market,
Speaker 4: the Chicom carbon market. They're all going to start using
Speaker 4: the same standard so that they can all be integrated,
Speaker 4: so that a carbon credit in the European Union is
Speaker 4: the same as a carbon credit in Brazil is the
Speaker 4: same as a carbon credit eventually in the United States
Speaker 4: of America, when they think they can pass this abomination
Speaker 4: on us and for all people who think this isn't
Speaker 4: a threat for the next three and a half years
Speaker 4: while we have Trump in office, I would just remind
Speaker 4: everybody that there's a lot of people in the administration
Speaker 4: who have publicly expressed support for these things in the past.
Speaker 4: Howard Lutnik, the Commerce Secretary, has actually been deeply involved
Speaker 4: in creating the infrastructure for the carbon markets. Elon Musk
Speaker 4: has been black bring about carbon markets for years and
Speaker 4: it be a big boon to Tesla, but he has
Speaker 4: suggested that carbon markets carbon taxes are a really efficient
Speaker 4: way of reducing our carbon emissions. You've got a lot
Speaker 4: of people in the administration, and I'm sure Scott bescent
Speaker 4: is among them who think these kinds of ideas are
Speaker 4: good and proper.
Speaker 1: Son to George Soros, Yeah, absolutely, of course.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 4: And the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations, I mean,
Speaker 4: the guys I think through and through suspect. But we
Speaker 4: need to realize that this is this is not a
Speaker 4: threat that's over. And I think that's one of the
Speaker 4: dangerous narratives that has gone through the alternative media in
Speaker 4: recent years, is like, oh, we won, all right, you know.
Speaker 2: Let's go back to focusing on more important things.
Speaker 4: The climate change hoax is still the pretext, not a pretext,
Speaker 4: the pretext for completely restructuring the global economy, completely undermining
Speaker 4: national sovereignty and transferring power and authority to the UN
Speaker 4: and bringing all the religions of the world together so
Speaker 4: that we can save mother Earth. And nothing has changed
Speaker 4: about that. They've just stop talking about it in the
Speaker 4: fake media in America, that's right.
Speaker 1: And when you look at Lutnik, you know the fact
Speaker 1: that he wants to common you know, I think about.
Speaker 3: It, how do we get the EU?
Speaker 1: Well, it all began with the common market, right, it
Speaker 1: agains with economic unification, and then before you know it,
Speaker 1: you've got a common currency. Well, what's that common currency
Speaker 1: going to be. It's going to be some stable coins
Speaker 1: that are being done by Lutnik, so they can monitor
Speaker 1: everybody's use and stop you from being able to spend
Speaker 1: if you don't, you know, do it the right way.
Speaker 1: So it's basically the way that they're going to bring
Speaker 1: in the CBDC. When you look at people getting very
Speaker 1: upset about this, it's primarily the power bills, and they're
Speaker 1: going to continue escalating these power bills by leaps and
Speaker 1: bounds for the purpose of artificial intelligence. And so they're
Speaker 1: going to have that fight. They're going to build that
Speaker 1: up as a necessity, and you know, once they get
Speaker 1: that in, they're going to use that to impose all
Speaker 1: of these these carbon markets and carbon credits and everything
Speaker 1: for individuals. And that's really where this is all headed.
Speaker 1: It is the perfect I talked about it as being
Speaker 1: the mcguffin, you know, Hitchcock always had. He said, it
Speaker 1: doesn't really matter what it is that they're chasing. It
Speaker 1: could be a multie falcon or whatever. They've got a
Speaker 1: different eject, you know, that's what we're using as our
Speaker 1: plot device for the movie. And so they got these
Speaker 1: different plot devices, and they just keep moving them around,
Speaker 1: but they always seem to go in the same direction.
Speaker 1: You know, we had the COVID mcguffin. It was all
Speaker 1: about getting some kind of a vaccine ID so they
Speaker 1: could track you in that type. So we've got to
Speaker 1: have the infrastructure to be able to track people's movements.
Speaker 1: We've got to have the digital biometric infrastructure so we
Speaker 1: can see what they've done and keep records on people.
Speaker 1: So they always have this. It always comes back to
Speaker 1: the same solution for all these different mcguffins, and they
Speaker 1: just have a different panic mode that they're trying to
Speaker 1: put people into.
Speaker 4: It truly is amazing, yep, absolutely, And you know, fear
Speaker 4: is of course one of the tools. Be afraid of
Speaker 4: climate change, be afraid of a COVID, afraid of you
Speaker 4: know whatever the pretext is, be afraid of drugs, be
Speaker 4: afraid of you know some people group in another part
Speaker 4: of the world that so lives in caves. You know,
Speaker 4: whatever it takes to make you very scared so that
Speaker 4: you'll give up more of your money, more your freedom.
Speaker 4: And so this is the oldest trick in the book, right,
Speaker 4: I mean, you can go back two hundred years. Look
Speaker 4: at Frederic Bastiat, the great French philosopher lawmaker, said that
Speaker 4: these totalitarians are constantly concocting the poison and the antidote
Speaker 4: in the same laboratory.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 2: Climate change is the ultimate example of that.
Speaker 4: Create a fake crisis over here and then create fake
Speaker 4: solutions to the fake crisis over here, and pressed that
Speaker 4: you take away people's money and freedom.
Speaker 3: How about that?
Speaker 1: Frederick Bastiat knew about the dark winter and operational word
Speaker 1: feed long before it ever happened, right.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 4: He knew the pattern of politicians well enough to be
Speaker 4: able to identify it.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 4: And unfortunately today people don't know this because they've been
Speaker 4: brainwashing a government school. You know, they really don't know.
Speaker 2: Much of anything.
Speaker 4: They haven't been trained in logic, they haven't been trained
Speaker 4: in history, they haven't been trained in analysis and reasoning.
Speaker 2: So, you know, someone on TV said.
Speaker 4: Climate change is going to get you, and a big
Speaker 4: percentage of the population says, oh, no, what do we
Speaker 4: need to do master to save me from this boogeyman?
Speaker 1: And here we are, Yeah, and that gets us really,
Speaker 1: I think to the real anecdote of this, and that
Speaker 1: is education, which you focus on quite a bit. You've
Speaker 1: written a book, The Indoctrinating Our Children to Death, and
Speaker 1: of course you also have a blog, The Newman Report
Speaker 1: is that on substack.
Speaker 4: The Newman Report is on Freedom Project our substack. People
Speaker 4: can find it at Liberty Sentinel and we'd love to
Speaker 4: have people sign up.
Speaker 2: Two times a week we send out the most important
Speaker 2: stuff that we're working on.
Speaker 3: So that's great.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, what what do you see happening in terms
Speaker 1: of education?
Speaker 3: Where's your.
Speaker 1: Whe're the threats that you see developing or do you
Speaker 1: see any good news in education?
Speaker 2: Well, there's good news and there's bad news.
Speaker 4: As you mentioned, you were kind enough to have me
Speaker 4: on to talk about Indoctrinating Our Children to Death about
Speaker 4: a year AGO's I think more relevant today than ever.
Speaker 4: And amazingly it's been endorsed by you know, a lot
Speaker 4: of great American patriots, including you, and so a lot
Speaker 4: of the things that we warned about that we're going
Speaker 4: to come in this book are now materializing. So we've
Speaker 4: got another book coming out in January. I wrote it
Speaker 4: with Robert Borton's he's the CEO of Classical Conversations. It's
Speaker 4: the biggest homeschooling organization in the world, over one hundred
Speaker 4: and thirty five thousand students, over a million graduates so far.
Speaker 4: And the book is called Woken Weaponize, How Karl Marx
Speaker 4: won the Battle for American education and how we can
Speaker 4: take it back.
Speaker 2: And it does focus some on the history.
Speaker 4: You know, we go back to the first guys that
Speaker 4: seriously proposed that the government ought to be educating our children.
Speaker 2: And they were occultist, they were.
Speaker 4: Totalitarians, they were comedies, they were weirdos, they were talking
Speaker 4: to spirit friends, and you know, we got smoking gun
Speaker 4: evidence of all that.
Speaker 3: But we're still going on.
Speaker 4: So oh absolutely, and I mean they don't even hide
Speaker 4: it anymore, right, Shirley mccoon, who George H. W. Bush
Speaker 4: put in the Department of Education and start nationalizing education.
Speaker 4: She's running around telling people she's talking to spirit ascended
Speaker 4: masters who are giving her the secret wisdom into the
Speaker 4: new Aide in the fifth dimension and of total bonkers.
Speaker 2: But that's what they're up to.
Speaker 1: Well, you got you got General Flynn who is leading
Speaker 1: people in prayers to ascended masters and the Seven Rays
Speaker 1: or something like that. He was plagiarizing Elizabeth Claire, prophet
Speaker 1: he's doing it. This is your awakened American things. So, yeah,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of discernment that needs to be had
Speaker 1: out there and a.
Speaker 3: Lot of education.
Speaker 1: And that's what I like about your your book, Indoctrinating
Speaker 1: Our Children to Death. You go into the history of
Speaker 1: this and so we can see the trend lines and
Speaker 1: where these people are coming from and what they said
Speaker 1: they wanted to do. Very important. Yeah, so you've got
Speaker 1: a new book coming out in January. That's great, Yes,
Speaker 1: we do.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and the big threat right now, you know, the
Speaker 4: good news is millions of families are continuing to flee
Speaker 4: from this corrupt, decaying government and doctrination system mask writing
Speaker 4: as a school system.
Speaker 2: The bad news is the UN knows this.
Speaker 4: The globalists know this, and they've got a plan, and
Speaker 4: we've got the reports where they outline their plans that
Speaker 4: we're going to give you free money and all you
Speaker 4: got to do is surrender your freedom and take our
Speaker 4: tests and teach our curriculum.
Speaker 2: The UN actually just released a report.
Speaker 4: David, about three weeks ago, maybe a month ago now,
Speaker 4: where they said homeschooling must if it's going to be allowed,
Speaker 4: it must be under the control of government. They have
Speaker 4: to be taught you and approved values, they have to
Speaker 4: use you, and approved education content. It was literally prepared
Speaker 4: under a North Korean communist and it says so in
Speaker 4: the acknowledgments. So they are absolutely coming for our children.
Speaker 4: And if we don't take this threat seriously, I think
Speaker 4: all the other fights were engaged in. You know, we
Speaker 4: might as well just raise the white flag because we're
Speaker 4: going to lose over the long term. We've got to agree
Speaker 4: with the education issue.
Speaker 1: I agree. It really is about the hearts and minds. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean that that was what they kept saying during
Speaker 1: Vietnam War. It's about the hearts and minds. Well, that's
Speaker 1: what the education system is really about, the hearts and
Speaker 1: minds of your children. They're coming after them, and it
Speaker 1: is a war to take that. That's why you know
Speaker 1: when you look at and again, they'll do it with money.
Speaker 1: They always do it with money. And that's why I
Speaker 1: was absolutely flabbergasid when people didn't get that, about the
Speaker 1: lockdowns and about the COVID pandemic and everything is that.
Speaker 1: Everybody would say, it's not Trump, it's the bad democratic governors.
Speaker 1: And I said, he's paying people to do this he's
Speaker 1: subsidizing the hospitals, and he's giving everybody else money for this.
Speaker 1: That's the way they always get around the Tenth Amendment
Speaker 1: or any illegal requirements. They give you money and then
Speaker 1: you do whatever they want. Once they give you that money,
Speaker 1: then you get accustomed to it.
Speaker 2: And they own the printing press.
Speaker 4: They've got infinite money, and they know that as long
Speaker 4: as they can print some new money, you'll dance to
Speaker 4: their tune.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's the greatest scam ever concocted in the
Speaker 2: history of man.
Speaker 1: Well, I tell you you know, Alex, I've said many
Speaker 1: times it's going to be really really difficult for us
Speaker 1: here in America once we lose that magic money tree,
Speaker 1: that they can just print it all out of nothing. Right,
Speaker 1: But that's the only way that you're going to break
Speaker 1: the power of the federal government is if you break
Speaker 1: the printing presses. And so it's going to be a
Speaker 1: good news bad news thing. It's kind of like the
Speaker 1: Silmer lining of the school like towns. I still think
Speaker 1: it's funny to go back and look at people talking
Speaker 1: about the pandemic and the ill effects of that, and
Speaker 1: look at it.
Speaker 3: Kept the school. It's kept the school schools for.
Speaker 1: A long time, and it's like, yeah, to me, that
Speaker 1: was one of the big advantage, the only advantage of it,
Speaker 1: the only silver lining that and the fact that people
Speaker 1: could finally see what was happening in their child's classroom.
Speaker 1: I can't tell you the number of times I've talked
Speaker 1: to people and they say, yeah, yeah, I understand what's
Speaker 1: going on over there in that other state, or maybe
Speaker 1: even here in this state, or maybe even in my
Speaker 1: particular school, but not in my kids classroom. Well, this
Speaker 1: time they could actually see what was happening in the classroom,
Speaker 1: and I think that was the big impetus. So the
Speaker 1: co author, there's someone who's running classical conversations. That's an
Speaker 1: excellent program. We didn't do that when we schooled our kids,
Speaker 1: but it really is an excellent, rigorous curriculum there.
Speaker 3: It is.
Speaker 4: Yeah, we've actually got our own kids enrolled in there.
Speaker 4: That's how I originally connected with them. Such a good program.
Speaker 4: Watching the kids going out of this, they're so far
Speaker 4: ahead of the poor victims of the government schools.
Speaker 2: It makes you want to cry.
Speaker 4: But you know, if you're a parent and you're looking
Speaker 4: for a good program to get your children a real education.
Speaker 4: That's the one.
Speaker 2: Check it out, classical conversation.
Speaker 1: I agree, Yeah, I think it's got a lot of
Speaker 1: great content in it. Well, it's always great having you
Speaker 1: on and again people can find you at Liberty Sentinel,
Speaker 1: is that correct.
Speaker 2: Liberty Sentinel dot org.
Speaker 4: And then the New American dot com is where most
Speaker 4: of our climate coverage is going to be. So for
Speaker 4: the folks out there who haven't signed up for the
Speaker 4: magazine and encourage them to do that at least the
Speaker 4: free daily headlines, the Neewamerican dot com and then my website, Yeah,
Speaker 4: Liberty Sentinel dot org.
Speaker 1: Okay, and I just remember the name of that guy,
Speaker 1: Steve Malloy. Steve Malloy was one to talk about a
Speaker 1: junks science dot com. I worked with Steve prior to
Speaker 1: Info Wars and he's a really good guy and he's
Speaker 1: really had his finger to the pultse of what's going
Speaker 1: on with the environmental stuff, just as you have. Thank
Speaker 1: you so much for joining us, and it's always a
Speaker 1: pleasure talking to you, Alex. And let us know when
Speaker 1: you got that new book on, like to talk to
Speaker 1: you about that when it's ready.
Speaker 4: Absolutely, Thank you so much. It's an honor and a
Speaker 4: pleasure to be here. Thank you, David, God bless you.
Speaker 4: And Merry Christmas.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Mery Christmas to you as well. We'll be
Speaker 1: right back, folks, to stay with us, oh,