WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.280 --> 00:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>The human guinea pig stuff in Africa.

2
00:01:09.719 --> 00:01:37.959
<v Speaker 2>It's so insane.

3
00:01:39.599 --> 00:01:42.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, what's up? Welcome everybody. We are back with

4
00:01:42.680 --> 00:01:45.319
<v Speaker 3>live stream number two today. Hopefully you enjoyed part one

5
00:01:45.879 --> 00:01:50.439
<v Speaker 3>with our bros Kai and David Arhon and now we're

6
00:01:50.439 --> 00:01:54.280
<v Speaker 3>back with a new bro. Bros are being birthed left

7
00:01:54.319 --> 00:01:59.079
<v Speaker 3>and right, bros being birthed. My big thick burthen hips

8
00:01:59.280 --> 00:02:01.159
<v Speaker 3>are contributing, by God's grace to.

9
00:02:01.359 --> 00:02:05.959
<v Speaker 4>Birthing more and more of our bros being silly. But

10
00:02:06.359 --> 00:02:07.840
<v Speaker 4>tonight we have a guest. I want to play a

11
00:02:07.840 --> 00:02:11.039
<v Speaker 4>little introductory song for our guest. His name is Alex.

12
00:02:13.479 --> 00:02:13.919
<v Speaker 5>It was.

13
00:02:23.120 --> 00:02:32.280
<v Speaker 3>It was all right, I'm not gonna play the whole song.

14
00:02:32.360 --> 00:02:32.840
<v Speaker 4>Y'all can go.

15
00:02:33.120 --> 00:02:37.159
<v Speaker 3>Y'all can go vibe out to that classic track very soon.

16
00:02:37.360 --> 00:02:40.879
<v Speaker 3>But it's relevant for our guests because Alex himself was

17
00:02:41.599 --> 00:02:45.639
<v Speaker 3>a Pentecostal. He was raised a Romanian Pentecostal, and he

18
00:02:45.639 --> 00:02:48.159
<v Speaker 3>has an amazing story about how he eventually found his

19
00:02:48.199 --> 00:02:51.639
<v Speaker 3>way by God's grace and buying providence to the Orthodox Church.

20
00:02:52.400 --> 00:02:54.639
<v Speaker 4>Alex, how you doing, dog, I'm great.

21
00:02:54.639 --> 00:02:56.759
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for having me on Jay. I appreciate that. Shout

22
00:02:56.759 --> 00:03:02.400
<v Speaker 5>out to the Romanian mafia thereas.

23
00:03:00.439 --> 00:03:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Back I'm assuming like every group has a mafia. Is

24
00:03:03.800 --> 00:03:05.319
<v Speaker 3>there an actual Romanian mafia?

25
00:03:06.199 --> 00:03:06.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

26
00:03:06.439 --> 00:03:08.439
<v Speaker 5>We try to keep it low key though, because you

27
00:03:08.479 --> 00:03:11.439
<v Speaker 5>know Romanians, you put them all together. The only way

28
00:03:11.439 --> 00:03:13.000
<v Speaker 5>you can get them to do something is if you

29
00:03:13.039 --> 00:03:16.319
<v Speaker 5>have one strong man in charge. It's really truly a

30
00:03:16.360 --> 00:03:18.840
<v Speaker 5>shock that it's not a Catholic country. I think because

31
00:03:18.960 --> 00:03:22.199
<v Speaker 5>Orthodoxy is so intertwined in the DNA, that's how they

32
00:03:22.199 --> 00:03:23.599
<v Speaker 5>were able to work it out there.

33
00:03:25.280 --> 00:03:28.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, you being a lawyer, you could be like the conciliary,

34
00:03:28.560 --> 00:03:31.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, to the crime family. You could give them

35
00:03:31.080 --> 00:03:32.000
<v Speaker 3>all the legal advice.

36
00:03:32.759 --> 00:03:36.000
<v Speaker 4>So you are an Orthodox lawyer. Before we get into.

37
00:03:35.800 --> 00:03:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Your backstory, can you I want to ask you this question.

38
00:03:40.800 --> 00:03:44.080
<v Speaker 3>You seem to appreciate and enjoy debate, and I'm just

39
00:03:44.120 --> 00:03:46.280
<v Speaker 3>wondering might that have something to do with the fact

40
00:03:46.280 --> 00:03:47.199
<v Speaker 3>that you're a lawyer.

41
00:03:48.400 --> 00:03:52.159
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely. I think lawyers, probably litigators in particular, they have

42
00:03:52.159 --> 00:03:53.639
<v Speaker 5>a specific way where they debate.

43
00:03:53.719 --> 00:03:53.919
<v Speaker 4>Right.

44
00:03:54.199 --> 00:03:57.439
<v Speaker 5>There's an old saying that says, if you have the facts,

45
00:03:57.479 --> 00:03:59.800
<v Speaker 5>pound the facts. If you have the law, pound the law.

46
00:04:00.080 --> 00:04:03.199
<v Speaker 5>You have neither, then pound the table. But there's like

47
00:04:03.439 --> 00:04:07.000
<v Speaker 5>a form of debate in lawyering that is like storytelling,

48
00:04:07.039 --> 00:04:10.680
<v Speaker 5>which is slightly different from the philosophical mode of debate

49
00:04:10.719 --> 00:04:13.719
<v Speaker 5>that you're a little more obviously very well acquainted with.

50
00:04:15.039 --> 00:04:17.920
<v Speaker 5>In our view, we're focused more on like persuasion, and

51
00:04:18.240 --> 00:04:21.199
<v Speaker 5>although in an academic setting, of course, a syllogism may

52
00:04:21.279 --> 00:04:25.800
<v Speaker 5>persuade somebody, within litigation, you're working with laypeople, you know,

53
00:04:25.839 --> 00:04:29.199
<v Speaker 5>in a jury. Yeah, so we're focusing on like telling

54
00:04:29.360 --> 00:04:32.199
<v Speaker 5>a compelling story and working with the facts. And I

55
00:04:32.240 --> 00:04:36.600
<v Speaker 5>think from that perspective I bring maybe a unique approach

56
00:04:36.680 --> 00:04:37.639
<v Speaker 5>to apologetics.

57
00:04:37.680 --> 00:04:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Now, I think that's a perfect descriptor of where your

58
00:04:42.199 --> 00:04:44.879
<v Speaker 3>approach is unique, because as I was watching your videos

59
00:04:44.920 --> 00:04:46.920
<v Speaker 3>and catching up on some of the responses which we're

60
00:04:46.920 --> 00:04:51.199
<v Speaker 3>going to get into the response to Joe Lene Heshmeier

61
00:04:51.319 --> 00:04:54.839
<v Speaker 3>and some of the other characters that you have interacted

62
00:04:54.879 --> 00:04:59.160
<v Speaker 3>with and responded to, you have a unique approach which

63
00:04:59.160 --> 00:05:02.600
<v Speaker 3>I think is very persuasive. And I would say that's

64
00:05:02.600 --> 00:05:05.879
<v Speaker 3>probably a deficit in my approach because a lot of

65
00:05:05.920 --> 00:05:11.680
<v Speaker 3>the you know, I don't know, spurgatisms and the silliness

66
00:05:12.120 --> 00:05:13.600
<v Speaker 3>can be off putting to some people.

67
00:05:13.600 --> 00:05:16.199
<v Speaker 4>But you have this very smooth, very.

68
00:05:16.839 --> 00:05:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Polished, persuasive approach which I think is a stellar in

69
00:05:21.279 --> 00:05:24.360
<v Speaker 3>the domain of rhetoric. But you're not just a skilled rhetorician.

70
00:05:24.439 --> 00:05:28.240
<v Speaker 3>You're also actually really good at presenting the facts and

71
00:05:28.279 --> 00:05:30.560
<v Speaker 3>doing an analytical approach. And so that's what I want

72
00:05:30.560 --> 00:05:34.519
<v Speaker 3>to get into today. So let's get your rewind you're

73
00:05:34.839 --> 00:05:38.839
<v Speaker 3>from a Romanian Pentecostal background. How do we get this.

74
00:05:38.879 --> 00:05:41.800
<v Speaker 4>Long story from that into the world of the Orthodox Church.

75
00:05:43.199 --> 00:05:45.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's certainly a long story. And thank you for

76
00:05:45.199 --> 00:05:47.680
<v Speaker 5>the compliments. I think it's high praise coming from someone

77
00:05:47.759 --> 00:05:50.199
<v Speaker 5>like yourself, who has you know, established himself in this

78
00:05:50.279 --> 00:05:54.360
<v Speaker 5>arena already. But for me, I am thankful. Growing up

79
00:05:54.439 --> 00:05:58.000
<v Speaker 5>Romanian Pentecostal in a way, they have a strong emphasis

80
00:05:58.040 --> 00:06:02.160
<v Speaker 5>on the scriptures, and my parents really immersed me in, like,

81
00:06:02.439 --> 00:06:04.279
<v Speaker 5>you know, even as a child, you know, those old

82
00:06:04.519 --> 00:06:07.519
<v Speaker 5>Hannah Barbera Bible cartoons, to where like even when I

83
00:06:07.560 --> 00:06:10.600
<v Speaker 5>was eight or nine, I already had a general idea

84
00:06:10.720 --> 00:06:14.120
<v Speaker 5>for like the overarching narrative of the Bible. Of course,

85
00:06:14.160 --> 00:06:15.639
<v Speaker 5>you know, I was a kid, so I didn't know

86
00:06:16.000 --> 00:06:19.199
<v Speaker 5>all the details or you know, how to structure persuasive

87
00:06:19.279 --> 00:06:22.639
<v Speaker 5>argumentation there, but there was a very strong emphasis on

88
00:06:22.839 --> 00:06:25.759
<v Speaker 5>like you know, maybe an excess that this book is

89
00:06:25.800 --> 00:06:28.399
<v Speaker 5>like so important, you really have to know this book,

90
00:06:28.600 --> 00:06:31.639
<v Speaker 5>you really have to know it covered to cover, and

91
00:06:31.759 --> 00:06:35.600
<v Speaker 5>a very strong emphasis on experience with God, not just

92
00:06:35.800 --> 00:06:41.399
<v Speaker 5>you know, theoretical intellectual knowledge, also experiencing God at the

93
00:06:41.399 --> 00:06:45.319
<v Speaker 5>same time. Of course, you learn later that within Pentecostalism

94
00:06:45.360 --> 00:06:48.879
<v Speaker 5>there are no guardrails there, which is what Orthodoxy provides

95
00:06:48.920 --> 00:06:54.079
<v Speaker 5>to experience God. But yeah, it was emphasized scripture a lot,

96
00:06:54.360 --> 00:06:58.399
<v Speaker 5>and I'm really thankful for that upbringing. Now Romanian Pentecostalism

97
00:06:58.480 --> 00:07:01.959
<v Speaker 5>and I think that Eastern European Pentecostalism in general it's

98
00:07:02.000 --> 00:07:05.399
<v Speaker 5>slightly different. Maybe it was just like thirty years behind

99
00:07:05.519 --> 00:07:09.399
<v Speaker 5>the American style of Pentecostalism because they were still very

100
00:07:09.439 --> 00:07:11.800
<v Speaker 5>traditional when I was growing up. The men and women

101
00:07:12.000 --> 00:07:15.399
<v Speaker 5>sat segregated, all of the women had head coverings. So

102
00:07:15.480 --> 00:07:18.720
<v Speaker 5>I think there was probably like holdovers from Orthodoxy because

103
00:07:18.759 --> 00:07:19.439
<v Speaker 5>it was really like.

104
00:07:19.439 --> 00:07:21.560
<v Speaker 3>Got to be because I've never heard of that American

105
00:07:21.600 --> 00:07:23.879
<v Speaker 3>Pentecostal charismatic church, and I had a period where I

106
00:07:23.959 --> 00:07:25.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of visited a lot of those when I was younger.

107
00:07:26.600 --> 00:07:30.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and today that is not the case. You see

108
00:07:30.040 --> 00:07:32.759
<v Speaker 5>within the Romanian Pentecostal community that I think it was

109
00:07:32.839 --> 00:07:36.040
<v Speaker 5>over COVID there was like an acceleration to the natural

110
00:07:36.079 --> 00:07:39.439
<v Speaker 5>conclusion of what Pentecostalism is. And that's really when my

111
00:07:39.560 --> 00:07:43.319
<v Speaker 5>radar went up and I was like, man, this is

112
00:07:43.360 --> 00:07:46.720
<v Speaker 5>really going towards a word of faith New Apostolic Reformation.

113
00:07:46.959 --> 00:07:50.199
<v Speaker 5>It's like really extreme hyper charismaticism.

114
00:07:50.279 --> 00:07:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Now before we move on, help us understand because a

115
00:07:53.160 --> 00:07:54.600
<v Speaker 3>lot of people in my I didn't even know what

116
00:07:54.639 --> 00:07:56.439
<v Speaker 3>this was until the other day when we were doing

117
00:07:56.720 --> 00:08:01.480
<v Speaker 3>like a Candice you know, TPUSA analysis downstream, What is

118
00:08:01.480 --> 00:08:04.879
<v Speaker 3>the new Apostolic Reformation and tie that into what you're

119
00:08:04.879 --> 00:08:06.839
<v Speaker 3>talking about with Pentecostalism.

120
00:08:07.240 --> 00:08:11.079
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So with Bill Johnson and this movement in California,

121
00:08:11.160 --> 00:08:14.759
<v Speaker 5>I think that's probably one of the most popular places

122
00:08:14.759 --> 00:08:18.279
<v Speaker 5>where you see the new Apostolic Reformation, where these people

123
00:08:18.319 --> 00:08:21.279
<v Speaker 5>believe that they are on the same spiritual level as

124
00:08:21.399 --> 00:08:24.160
<v Speaker 5>the Apostles themselves, and they think that there are new

125
00:08:24.199 --> 00:08:27.920
<v Speaker 5>Apostles that are coming out from this charismatic movement. And

126
00:08:28.439 --> 00:08:31.040
<v Speaker 5>of course this is a point that you yourself make

127
00:08:31.199 --> 00:08:34.799
<v Speaker 5>jay with any new sect that Jude is very clear

128
00:08:34.840 --> 00:08:37.759
<v Speaker 5>that the entirety of the Apostolic deposit has already been

129
00:08:37.919 --> 00:08:40.919
<v Speaker 5>given to the church. There is no new revelation. We

130
00:08:41.039 --> 00:08:45.600
<v Speaker 5>have all the new revelation already. So yeah, it's just

131
00:08:45.639 --> 00:08:51.200
<v Speaker 5>it's a sect within Charismaticism that talks about these apostles

132
00:08:51.440 --> 00:08:53.519
<v Speaker 5>that are coming up ruling the church in a way.

133
00:08:53.799 --> 00:08:56.480
<v Speaker 3>It's weird though, it's almost like they kind of realized, hmm,

134
00:08:56.639 --> 00:09:00.840
<v Speaker 3>we kind of need some kind of living body of authority.

135
00:09:01.360 --> 00:09:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Let's just say we're apostles, you know what I mean,

136
00:09:03.159 --> 00:09:06.639
<v Speaker 3>Like maybe they're sensing that, you know, there's something missing

137
00:09:06.679 --> 00:09:10.200
<v Speaker 3>in the world of nobody can bind anybody else, you know,

138
00:09:11.320 --> 00:09:13.519
<v Speaker 3>in terms of conscience in the Protestant world. So I mean,

139
00:09:13.559 --> 00:09:15.519
<v Speaker 3>I know it's silly, but it's almost it's always funny

140
00:09:15.559 --> 00:09:19.960
<v Speaker 3>when you get like these elements of Evangelicalism or Protestantism

141
00:09:20.000 --> 00:09:23.200
<v Speaker 3>that kind of start suddenly tacking on ideas that are

142
00:09:23.240 --> 00:09:25.799
<v Speaker 3>already kind of in orthodoxy. There was a push, for example,

143
00:09:25.879 --> 00:09:29.200
<v Speaker 3>some years ago, about twenty years ago, when the emergent

144
00:09:29.399 --> 00:09:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Church movement was kind of getting popular, which was a

145
00:09:32.360 --> 00:09:37.320
<v Speaker 3>very obviously concocted, sort of corporate approach to Christianity. But

146
00:09:37.480 --> 00:09:38.960
<v Speaker 3>what was funny about it was at a certain point

147
00:09:39.000 --> 00:09:42.639
<v Speaker 3>they started saying, ooh, why don't we put like liturgical

148
00:09:43.120 --> 00:09:46.559
<v Speaker 3>patterns into the worship like instead of a like it's

149
00:09:46.600 --> 00:09:49.159
<v Speaker 3>like they just had this new, you know, branding idea,

150
00:09:49.240 --> 00:09:53.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's like, this is not new. It's like you're

151
00:09:53.000 --> 00:09:55.000
<v Speaker 3>doing the things that I've been here for two thousand years.

152
00:09:55.480 --> 00:09:57.639
<v Speaker 5>That is actually a huge theme I think and how

153
00:09:57.679 --> 00:10:00.759
<v Speaker 5>I made the move over to Orthodox, you know. And

154
00:10:00.960 --> 00:10:04.200
<v Speaker 5>as we will get to that eventually. But when I

155
00:10:04.240 --> 00:10:06.879
<v Speaker 5>was growing up, I was always interested in theology. I

156
00:10:06.919 --> 00:10:10.120
<v Speaker 5>was always interested in philosophy. However, I wouldn't say that

157
00:10:10.159 --> 00:10:12.759
<v Speaker 5>like I'm a philosophy bro. I wouldn't say that I'm

158
00:10:12.799 --> 00:10:15.480
<v Speaker 5>a theology bro either, Like I think I'm very much

159
00:10:15.519 --> 00:10:20.120
<v Speaker 5>formed by my profession of advocacy. But I remember through

160
00:10:20.200 --> 00:10:25.759
<v Speaker 5>high school legality bro. Hopefully not a legalist bro, you know.

161
00:10:27.440 --> 00:10:31.840
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, I remember in high school. That's when Christopher Hitchens,

162
00:10:31.919 --> 00:10:34.039
<v Speaker 5>I think, was like at the top of his game,

163
00:10:35.000 --> 00:10:38.200
<v Speaker 5>fifteen sixteen or so years ago, and I remember watching

164
00:10:38.200 --> 00:10:40.639
<v Speaker 5>his debate with John Lennox, like over and over again.

165
00:10:40.679 --> 00:10:42.759
<v Speaker 5>It's been a while since I've watched that debate, but

166
00:10:43.200 --> 00:10:46.320
<v Speaker 5>if I remember correctly, John Lennox was like slamming this

167
00:10:46.440 --> 00:10:50.519
<v Speaker 5>objective truths from maths and fine tuning, and Christopher Hitchens

168
00:10:50.679 --> 00:10:55.159
<v Speaker 5>was just bringing this like extreme skepticism, and you know,

169
00:10:55.200 --> 00:10:57.919
<v Speaker 5>in my sixteen year old brain or whatever it was

170
00:10:57.960 --> 00:11:01.080
<v Speaker 5>at the time, I found Hitchens very convincing because he

171
00:11:01.200 --> 00:11:03.399
<v Speaker 5>was a very good rhetoricician, you know, And although I

172
00:11:03.399 --> 00:11:06.440
<v Speaker 5>think John Lennox won that debate, I think on rhetoric

173
00:11:07.440 --> 00:11:11.279
<v Speaker 5>Christopher Hitchens might have taken it there. Looking back at what.

174
00:11:11.519 --> 00:11:13.799
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I think I think we did cover

175
00:11:13.960 --> 00:11:16.039
<v Speaker 3>that a couple of years ago on my channel. So

176
00:11:16.159 --> 00:11:18.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad you mentioned that, because I actually forgotten about

177
00:11:18.039 --> 00:11:21.080
<v Speaker 3>that debate, but I do remember him, you know, hammering

178
00:11:21.159 --> 00:11:24.399
<v Speaker 3>home a lot of those sort of mathematical points, which

179
00:11:24.399 --> 00:11:27.679
<v Speaker 3>is interesting because that seems to have had some impact

180
00:11:27.759 --> 00:11:33.120
<v Speaker 3>on cosmic skeptic Alex O'Connor, who's now sort of sort

181
00:11:33.120 --> 00:11:35.320
<v Speaker 3>of saying that he might be open to some kind

182
00:11:35.360 --> 00:11:36.919
<v Speaker 3>of theism, which is fascinating.

183
00:11:38.080 --> 00:11:41.399
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think maybe there's something to look out for there.

184
00:11:41.440 --> 00:11:43.720
<v Speaker 5>Who knows, you know, I wouldn't put too many chips

185
00:11:43.720 --> 00:11:46.919
<v Speaker 5>in that after building his career on this extreme skepticism

186
00:11:47.000 --> 00:11:52.240
<v Speaker 5>that we see. Yeah, so at one point after that,

187
00:11:52.320 --> 00:11:56.440
<v Speaker 5>you know, I overcame this atheism because there were I

188
00:11:56.440 --> 00:11:58.600
<v Speaker 5>guess I can't articulate it as well as you would,

189
00:11:58.600 --> 00:12:00.879
<v Speaker 5>but even at that point in my life, I understood

190
00:12:00.879 --> 00:12:05.320
<v Speaker 5>that there were some underlying requirements to have a worldview work,

191
00:12:05.519 --> 00:12:11.000
<v Speaker 5>you know, these regularity in the universe, uniformity, these presuppositions

192
00:12:11.000 --> 00:12:14.519
<v Speaker 5>for knowledge, this epistemic grounding. I think, as you would say,

193
00:12:15.320 --> 00:12:17.039
<v Speaker 5>it was like this atheism thing is not going to

194
00:12:17.039 --> 00:12:19.679
<v Speaker 5>work out. And you know, luckily I had some very

195
00:12:19.720 --> 00:12:22.679
<v Speaker 5>good mentors in the Romanian Pentecostal community then that had

196
00:12:22.720 --> 00:12:25.480
<v Speaker 5>actually gone to seminary gotten their degrees.

197
00:12:25.759 --> 00:12:28.440
<v Speaker 3>So were you were you atheists for a period or

198
00:12:28.480 --> 00:12:30.279
<v Speaker 3>just sort of open to it.

199
00:12:30.279 --> 00:12:32.679
<v Speaker 5>It was maybe five or six months.

200
00:12:32.679 --> 00:12:32.840
<v Speaker 4>You know.

201
00:12:32.879 --> 00:12:35.279
<v Speaker 5>I think everybody kind of has that edgy phase in

202
00:12:35.320 --> 00:12:38.840
<v Speaker 5>their like teen, late teens and twenties where they consider it,

203
00:12:38.879 --> 00:12:43.559
<v Speaker 5>and that's that's more of what it was like. But

204
00:12:43.679 --> 00:12:46.360
<v Speaker 5>I considered going into theology at one point there because

205
00:12:46.360 --> 00:12:48.399
<v Speaker 5>I knew I wanted a career of like talking to

206
00:12:48.440 --> 00:12:53.440
<v Speaker 5>people and you know, helping people through their problems. And

207
00:12:53.480 --> 00:12:55.200
<v Speaker 5>then I talked to one of my mentors and he

208
00:12:55.320 --> 00:12:57.679
<v Speaker 5>was like, you have to be prepared to be like

209
00:12:57.879 --> 00:12:59.759
<v Speaker 5>very poor for your life, and I was like this

210
00:13:00.080 --> 00:13:02.840
<v Speaker 5>probably not, probably not the move for me. So that

211
00:13:02.919 --> 00:13:05.799
<v Speaker 5>was a very good sobering conversation. Now, I think today

212
00:13:05.840 --> 00:13:08.759
<v Speaker 5>in Pentecostalism you would not hear anybody talking about that

213
00:13:09.840 --> 00:13:12.639
<v Speaker 5>God is going to provide for you. You just plant so

214
00:13:12.759 --> 00:13:15.159
<v Speaker 5>a seed here and you'll get sevenfold in return.

215
00:13:15.799 --> 00:13:16.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

216
00:13:16.159 --> 00:13:18.279
<v Speaker 3>Would you say that the Word of Faith type stuff

217
00:13:18.279 --> 00:13:20.840
<v Speaker 3>has really spread everywhere, even in so they're like the

218
00:13:20.960 --> 00:13:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Romanian Pentecostal circles, because that's.

219
00:13:23.480 --> 00:13:24.480
<v Speaker 4>Odd, you know, to me.

220
00:13:24.720 --> 00:13:28.120
<v Speaker 3>I remember when I was visiting some charismatic Pentecostal type

221
00:13:28.200 --> 00:13:30.039
<v Speaker 3>churches when I was first reading the Bible back in

222
00:13:30.080 --> 00:13:34.120
<v Speaker 3>the in the late nineties. The Word of Faith kind

223
00:13:34.159 --> 00:13:37.639
<v Speaker 3>of you know, name it, claimant, blab it, grab it,

224
00:13:37.840 --> 00:13:41.799
<v Speaker 3>kinde of copeland stuff that was only on TV and

225
00:13:41.879 --> 00:13:45.200
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't really in like local sort of charismatic Pentecostal

226
00:13:45.279 --> 00:13:48.480
<v Speaker 3>churches in the Bible Belt. Would you say that's different now?

227
00:13:48.559 --> 00:13:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Is it like kind of spread to other areas?

228
00:13:51.279 --> 00:13:54.480
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely. I think if you find a more conservative Pentecostal

229
00:13:54.639 --> 00:13:57.960
<v Speaker 5>church within the Romanian community, that is the exception to

230
00:13:58.000 --> 00:13:59.600
<v Speaker 5>the rule. I think the rule is that they are

231
00:13:59.639 --> 00:14:02.799
<v Speaker 5>leaning towards that word of faith type of name it

232
00:14:02.799 --> 00:14:04.840
<v Speaker 5>and claimate theology. Absolutely.

233
00:14:05.720 --> 00:14:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so you, uh, let's get back to your story.

234
00:14:08.279 --> 00:14:10.279
<v Speaker 3>So pick back up where you were. I apologize, and

235
00:14:10.279 --> 00:14:12.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean to get us distracted, But you were talking about,

236
00:14:13.720 --> 00:14:16.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, meeting some sort of mentors in your which

237
00:14:16.279 --> 00:14:18.399
<v Speaker 3>is again, that's very rare to me to have the

238
00:14:18.519 --> 00:14:22.120
<v Speaker 3>sort of mentors in that domain because usually there's not

239
00:14:22.120 --> 00:14:24.039
<v Speaker 3>a lot of wisdom in that domain, at least not

240
00:14:24.039 --> 00:14:24.799
<v Speaker 3>in the Bible belt.

241
00:14:25.000 --> 00:14:25.679
<v Speaker 4>Because that was my.

242
00:14:25.679 --> 00:14:29.919
<v Speaker 3>Only exposure to this kind of a flavor of Christianity.

243
00:14:29.960 --> 00:14:35.039
<v Speaker 3>But so what what was happening next to get you

244
00:14:35.159 --> 00:14:38.639
<v Speaker 3>kind of were you beginning to question Pentecostalism? By the way,

245
00:14:38.960 --> 00:14:43.039
<v Speaker 3>was this a Trinitarian or anti Trinitarian oneness Pentecostal?

246
00:14:43.600 --> 00:14:47.559
<v Speaker 5>This was Trinitarian. Luckily, Luckily I wasn't born into a

247
00:14:47.600 --> 00:14:50.200
<v Speaker 5>oneness Pentecostal. But I mean I was at a point

248
00:14:50.200 --> 00:14:53.639
<v Speaker 5>in my life where you know, I was interested in

249
00:14:53.679 --> 00:14:55.879
<v Speaker 5>these things, in these theological issues, and we would always

250
00:14:55.919 --> 00:14:57.799
<v Speaker 5>go back and forth, and it really seemed like the

251
00:14:57.840 --> 00:15:01.600
<v Speaker 5>only two positions were like that or Pentecostal. Because you know,

252
00:15:01.919 --> 00:15:06.159
<v Speaker 5>Roman Catholics they worship Mary and the Pentecostal Romanians when

253
00:15:06.200 --> 00:15:10.159
<v Speaker 5>they migrated to America, they had a very like sour

254
00:15:10.240 --> 00:15:12.919
<v Speaker 5>taste in their mouth, I guess from the Orthodox Church,

255
00:15:12.960 --> 00:15:16.279
<v Speaker 5>because there were a lot of conflicts between the Orthodox

256
00:15:16.360 --> 00:15:20.039
<v Speaker 5>Church at that point and the Romanian Pentecostal sectarians. So

257
00:15:20.120 --> 00:15:22.120
<v Speaker 5>it was like, well, the Orthodox were mean to us

258
00:15:22.120 --> 00:15:25.519
<v Speaker 5>in Romania, so that's not an option. The Roman Catholics

259
00:15:25.519 --> 00:15:29.799
<v Speaker 5>they worship Mary, so that's not an option. Lutherans are like, Okay,

260
00:15:29.960 --> 00:15:32.559
<v Speaker 5>I guess, but there wasn't really an emphasis on church

261
00:15:32.639 --> 00:15:35.720
<v Speaker 5>history there, which I assume now is probably for a

262
00:15:35.759 --> 00:15:38.200
<v Speaker 5>good reason because if you look at the founding of

263
00:15:38.200 --> 00:15:43.279
<v Speaker 5>Pentecostalism with Charles Parham, who is like more probably probably

264
00:15:43.360 --> 00:15:47.519
<v Speaker 5>was a homosexual, like a very open racist, like not

265
00:15:47.639 --> 00:15:52.200
<v Speaker 5>race realist, like actual racist, and then the emergence of

266
00:15:52.240 --> 00:15:56.240
<v Speaker 5>the angelic language speaking in tongues over time, church history

267
00:15:56.320 --> 00:15:59.279
<v Speaker 5>is not the friend of a Pentecostal So I understand

268
00:15:59.320 --> 00:16:01.600
<v Speaker 5>why there was not huge emphasis on that there.

269
00:16:01.679 --> 00:16:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Did you have like the explanation that many of them do,

270
00:16:05.200 --> 00:16:07.799
<v Speaker 3>like if this topic came up that oh, well, Paul's

271
00:16:07.840 --> 00:16:10.240
<v Speaker 3>clearly talking about a kind of an angelic prayer language,

272
00:16:10.320 --> 00:16:11.879
<v Speaker 3>or did you have some other explanation.

273
00:16:13.559 --> 00:16:16.000
<v Speaker 5>I think that was typically the go to passage, you know,

274
00:16:16.080 --> 00:16:19.440
<v Speaker 5>the standard proof text, like the Spirit intercedes for us

275
00:16:19.480 --> 00:16:22.480
<v Speaker 5>with groaning, or you know in I think it's First

276
00:16:22.519 --> 00:16:26.759
<v Speaker 5>Corinthians twelve where he has that clearly hyperbolic comparison to

277
00:16:26.960 --> 00:16:34.080
<v Speaker 5>the language of angels, and further down in First Corinthians

278
00:16:34.080 --> 00:16:39.799
<v Speaker 5>when he talks about how I prefer like, I've prayed

279
00:16:39.799 --> 00:16:41.559
<v Speaker 5>in tongues more than all of you, but I prefer

280
00:16:41.639 --> 00:16:44.279
<v Speaker 5>you to prophesy. And when I read that, now he's

281
00:16:44.320 --> 00:16:46.360
<v Speaker 5>clearly telling them to speak in tongues. Less he's not

282
00:16:46.399 --> 00:16:50.320
<v Speaker 5>telling them to speak in tongues, but the Pentecostal community

283
00:16:50.360 --> 00:16:52.759
<v Speaker 5>will use that as a proof text to speak in tongues,

284
00:16:52.919 --> 00:16:54.919
<v Speaker 5>and he's saying the opposite, it seems.

285
00:16:57.960 --> 00:16:58.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

286
00:16:58.279 --> 00:17:02.000
<v Speaker 3>So you know, that's classic issue that we've covered many,

287
00:17:02.039 --> 00:17:04.119
<v Speaker 3>many times in the last few months because I had

288
00:17:04.119 --> 00:17:05.680
<v Speaker 3>so many people sort of saying, hey, when are you

289
00:17:05.720 --> 00:17:10.359
<v Speaker 3>going to cover more charismatic Pentecostal issues, And then we

290
00:17:10.359 --> 00:17:13.240
<v Speaker 3>did multiple streams, public and private, and one of them

291
00:17:13.279 --> 00:17:15.200
<v Speaker 3>I think was even like four or five six hours.

292
00:17:15.200 --> 00:17:17.599
<v Speaker 3>But you know, one of the issues that you hit on,

293
00:17:17.680 --> 00:17:21.119
<v Speaker 3>I think in the discussion that you had with cleaves antiquity.

294
00:17:21.279 --> 00:17:23.799
<v Speaker 3>What that you mentioned earlier was this idea of new

295
00:17:23.799 --> 00:17:27.279
<v Speaker 3>ongoing revelations. So I'm always curious when I hear you know,

296
00:17:27.400 --> 00:17:30.160
<v Speaker 3>former Pentecostals, like did this issue ever come up when

297
00:17:30.200 --> 00:17:34.079
<v Speaker 3>you were Pentecostal of the problem of like new revelations

298
00:17:34.119 --> 00:17:37.039
<v Speaker 3>and pastors that claim to have a word of knowledge

299
00:17:37.119 --> 00:17:39.519
<v Speaker 3>and then they get it wrong, and like does that

300
00:17:39.599 --> 00:17:42.000
<v Speaker 3>not count? Was that not God speaking through you? Like

301
00:17:42.079 --> 00:17:44.519
<v Speaker 3>does God get it wrong? Like did any of that

302
00:17:44.680 --> 00:17:46.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of like lodge in your mind as like a

303
00:17:46.759 --> 00:17:49.160
<v Speaker 3>problem to kind of grapple with or was it not

304
00:17:49.200 --> 00:17:49.920
<v Speaker 3>really an issue?

305
00:17:51.039 --> 00:17:54.720
<v Speaker 5>It was more of like a social reinforcement to be like, oh,

306
00:17:54.759 --> 00:17:57.559
<v Speaker 5>this guy prophesied something falsely, so like now we don't

307
00:17:57.599 --> 00:17:59.880
<v Speaker 5>like him any more kind of thing. It wasn't really

308
00:18:00.279 --> 00:18:02.039
<v Speaker 5>like we didn't think about it in terms of our

309
00:18:02.079 --> 00:18:05.000
<v Speaker 5>theological system, which is like a huge problem. But usually

310
00:18:05.039 --> 00:18:09.720
<v Speaker 5>it's just a rationalization. Like there's the reasoning I remember

311
00:18:09.839 --> 00:18:11.599
<v Speaker 5>and that I see now is like, oh, well, the

312
00:18:11.599 --> 00:18:15.160
<v Speaker 5>Holy Spirit gives revelation and prophecy to the individual. But

313
00:18:15.279 --> 00:18:18.200
<v Speaker 5>because we're humans, we're like corrupted creatures. So when it

314
00:18:18.240 --> 00:18:21.240
<v Speaker 5>comes out and we try to express the revelation. Then

315
00:18:21.240 --> 00:18:23.839
<v Speaker 5>it gets all messed up and jumbled up, which is like, it's.

316
00:18:23.680 --> 00:18:26.680
<v Speaker 4>Actually a pretty creative cope there. I like that one.

317
00:18:26.680 --> 00:18:27.279
<v Speaker 4>That's pretty good.

318
00:18:27.440 --> 00:18:29.119
<v Speaker 5>A huge problem for the Bible.

319
00:18:29.400 --> 00:18:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Like I was gonna say, like, wouldn't that apply to

320
00:18:32.400 --> 00:18:33.799
<v Speaker 3>Paul writing epistles?

321
00:18:33.839 --> 00:18:35.599
<v Speaker 4>And yeah?

322
00:18:35.920 --> 00:18:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So now so you're you've got these mentors, you're

323
00:18:40.240 --> 00:18:44.759
<v Speaker 3>pentecostal basically, you know, at some point there's got to

324
00:18:44.839 --> 00:18:47.599
<v Speaker 3>be chinks in the armor getting exposed, or is beginning

325
00:18:47.599 --> 00:18:49.240
<v Speaker 3>to be cracks in this paradigm.

326
00:18:50.400 --> 00:18:53.599
<v Speaker 4>What what were the first cracks that started happening.

327
00:18:54.599 --> 00:18:59.079
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So I didn't really think about this until much later.

328
00:18:59.200 --> 00:19:01.799
<v Speaker 5>I think I had already become a lawyer and become established.

329
00:19:01.839 --> 00:19:03.680
<v Speaker 5>You know, I was thinking about a career. I was

330
00:19:03.720 --> 00:19:07.319
<v Speaker 5>considering maybe theology. I was dissuaded from that. I considered

331
00:19:07.359 --> 00:19:10.079
<v Speaker 5>maybe going into like clinical psychology, because, as I said,

332
00:19:10.119 --> 00:19:12.000
<v Speaker 5>I wanted to talk with people and work with people.

333
00:19:12.279 --> 00:19:13.799
<v Speaker 5>And then I show up to like psych one hundred

334
00:19:13.839 --> 00:19:17.079
<v Speaker 5>and everybody has like whispy beards and fedoras and like vests.

335
00:19:17.359 --> 00:19:20.000
<v Speaker 5>This is not my crowd or anything. So I decided, like,

336
00:19:20.039 --> 00:19:21.720
<v Speaker 5>maybe I'll go to law school. At that point so

337
00:19:21.839 --> 00:19:24.160
<v Speaker 5>I go through law school, you know, I find some

338
00:19:24.279 --> 00:19:29.880
<v Speaker 5>mentors in the legal realm within litigation, and that formed

339
00:19:29.920 --> 00:19:33.359
<v Speaker 5>my thinking a lot, going through law school and learning

340
00:19:33.559 --> 00:19:38.039
<v Speaker 5>this profession of litigation, these professional persuaders, and the top

341
00:19:38.160 --> 00:19:41.039
<v Speaker 5>level of that is just insane. Like they I would

342
00:19:41.079 --> 00:19:44.000
<v Speaker 5>compare it to they have magic powers of persuasion. And

343
00:19:44.039 --> 00:19:47.240
<v Speaker 5>I don't think I'm on that highest tier yet. Hopefully

344
00:19:47.240 --> 00:19:49.759
<v Speaker 5>one day I'll get there. But it was really during

345
00:19:50.119 --> 00:19:54.000
<v Speaker 5>COVID that I saw this acceleration within the Romanian Pentecostal

346
00:19:54.039 --> 00:19:57.319
<v Speaker 5>community going more towards Word of Faith and the New

347
00:19:57.319 --> 00:20:00.160
<v Speaker 5>Apostolic Reformation. I'll say, this can't be right. It was

348
00:20:00.200 --> 00:20:03.119
<v Speaker 5>really like twenty twenty, twenty twenty one when I started,

349
00:20:03.200 --> 00:20:06.960
<v Speaker 5>like so five years ago, when I started turning back

350
00:20:07.000 --> 00:20:08.960
<v Speaker 5>the clock and like kind of starting from present day

351
00:20:09.359 --> 00:20:13.240
<v Speaker 5>and going back. And I was very interested in Calvinism

352
00:20:13.359 --> 00:20:18.400
<v Speaker 5>at that time. And there was a documentary that like

353
00:20:18.440 --> 00:20:22.079
<v Speaker 5>some Baptists made called Cessationist, which I think that really

354
00:20:22.119 --> 00:20:26.079
<v Speaker 5>opened my eyes to the false experiences in the pre

355
00:20:26.240 --> 00:20:31.039
<v Speaker 5>list within the Pentecostal movement, because it's really hard, I think,

356
00:20:31.079 --> 00:20:33.440
<v Speaker 5>to shake your identity from like no, I did have

357
00:20:33.480 --> 00:20:37.559
<v Speaker 5>this real religious experience. I did, like people really believe that.

358
00:20:37.599 --> 00:20:41.160
<v Speaker 5>They don't want that I've been tricked for like my

359
00:20:41.200 --> 00:20:43.640
<v Speaker 5>whole life, right, nobody wants to come to that conclusion.

360
00:20:44.119 --> 00:20:45.920
<v Speaker 5>But when I saw that, like really, what did it

361
00:20:45.920 --> 00:20:47.640
<v Speaker 5>for me was there was a scene of like some

362
00:20:47.720 --> 00:20:53.319
<v Speaker 5>Kundalini reawakening images and then like a Pentecostal gathering, and

363
00:20:53.319 --> 00:20:55.960
<v Speaker 5>I was like, man, it cannot tell the difference. They

364
00:20:55.960 --> 00:20:56.839
<v Speaker 5>are identical.

365
00:20:58.759 --> 00:21:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so sometimes guys, the workaround requires me to flip

366
00:21:02.519 --> 00:21:05.720
<v Speaker 3>the monitor on and off. So that's all that was was.

367
00:21:05.839 --> 00:21:07.839
<v Speaker 3>That's why there was an echo, So just relax, just

368
00:21:07.880 --> 00:21:12.440
<v Speaker 3>sit refresh. We all know that there's perpetual issues with

369
00:21:12.599 --> 00:21:19.839
<v Speaker 3>iOS and Apple and stream labs. But yeah, so I

370
00:21:19.880 --> 00:21:22.160
<v Speaker 3>remember too because I had a Pentecostal phase or I

371
00:21:22.200 --> 00:21:24.839
<v Speaker 3>mean charismatic phase where I went to some charismatic churches

372
00:21:24.880 --> 00:21:28.359
<v Speaker 3>for a while and I think eventually what really sort

373
00:21:28.359 --> 00:21:31.440
<v Speaker 3>of stuck out to me what I thought, you know,

374
00:21:31.680 --> 00:21:33.640
<v Speaker 3>in good faith, that well, this is what's happening in

375
00:21:33.680 --> 00:21:36.640
<v Speaker 3>the Book of Acts, right, like this is them. You know,

376
00:21:37.039 --> 00:21:39.640
<v Speaker 3>they look like they're drunk in the spirit. That's got

377
00:21:39.680 --> 00:21:43.720
<v Speaker 3>to be some kind of like overwhelming you know, flopping

378
00:21:43.759 --> 00:21:46.839
<v Speaker 3>and rolling around and acting silly type of stuff. But

379
00:21:46.880 --> 00:21:49.160
<v Speaker 3>then I remember when I was reading Corinthians, and I

380
00:21:49.200 --> 00:21:52.279
<v Speaker 3>would notice Paul would say things like God.

381
00:21:52.160 --> 00:21:53.519
<v Speaker 4>Is not the author of confusion.

382
00:21:53.759 --> 00:21:56.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, you guys are acting insane and crazy, like

383
00:21:57.559 --> 00:21:59.680
<v Speaker 3>what is wrong with what you guys are doing?

384
00:21:59.759 --> 00:22:03.119
<v Speaker 4>Like what's wrong with you? Right? You got it all backwards,

385
00:22:03.119 --> 00:22:04.079
<v Speaker 4>And I realized.

386
00:22:03.759 --> 00:22:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, so, wait a minute, Actually, the way the charismatic

387
00:22:06.200 --> 00:22:10.799
<v Speaker 3>churches operate is sounds like the things that Paul's complaining about, right,

388
00:22:11.359 --> 00:22:13.480
<v Speaker 3>And at first I thought, well, that would mean that

389
00:22:13.480 --> 00:22:16.279
<v Speaker 3>that's the true church because they're operating the way Paul's complaining.

390
00:22:16.279 --> 00:22:19.079
<v Speaker 3>But then I realized, no, wait a minute, the worship

391
00:22:19.160 --> 00:22:24.960
<v Speaker 3>service isn't actually based on new ongoing revelations if the

392
00:22:25.000 --> 00:22:27.240
<v Speaker 3>faith was once for all committed to the saints. And then,

393
00:22:27.599 --> 00:22:30.039
<v Speaker 3>as you know, there's many other passages that really sort

394
00:22:30.039 --> 00:22:32.880
<v Speaker 3>of back up this idea of the finality of divine

395
00:22:32.960 --> 00:22:36.880
<v Speaker 3>revelation at some point in terms of public dogmatic revelation, right,

396
00:22:36.920 --> 00:22:39.279
<v Speaker 3>And even that text in Daniel nine says the sealing

397
00:22:39.319 --> 00:22:42.359
<v Speaker 3>up of vision and prophecy doesn't mean that all the

398
00:22:42.400 --> 00:22:47.799
<v Speaker 3>prophecies are fulfilled at the first Advent, but the revelation

399
00:22:48.240 --> 00:22:51.920
<v Speaker 3>seems to be in some way completed at the first

400
00:22:51.960 --> 00:22:54.680
<v Speaker 3>advent of the Messiah. You have that passage in Zachariath.

401
00:22:54.839 --> 00:22:57.720
<v Speaker 3>I think it's thirteen that talks about when the Messiah comes,

402
00:22:57.720 --> 00:23:01.119
<v Speaker 3>there will no longer be profits we have. I remember

403
00:23:01.319 --> 00:23:04.640
<v Speaker 3>learning a long time ago Joseph Smith altering Luke sixteen

404
00:23:04.759 --> 00:23:07.400
<v Speaker 3>sixteen about you know, John the Baptist being the last

405
00:23:07.480 --> 00:23:09.920
<v Speaker 3>of the prophets, and of course jose Smith had to

406
00:23:09.920 --> 00:23:12.799
<v Speaker 3>make that, you know, some some other wordings so that

407
00:23:12.839 --> 00:23:14.200
<v Speaker 3>he could be another prophet.

408
00:23:14.640 --> 00:23:21.920
<v Speaker 4>And then I think, you know, over time you wait,

409
00:23:21.960 --> 00:23:24.000
<v Speaker 4>are you guys saying that the sound doesn't work?

410
00:23:26.799 --> 00:23:28.079
<v Speaker 3>See, we had a whole how do we have a

411
00:23:28.119 --> 00:23:32.680
<v Speaker 3>whole freaking interview that we had a whole interview that

412
00:23:32.720 --> 00:23:35.119
<v Speaker 3>went perfect with no issues, and then as soon as

413
00:23:35.160 --> 00:23:40.400
<v Speaker 3>I get my law bro on, everything goes insane.

414
00:23:40.519 --> 00:23:43.680
<v Speaker 5>All right, Right, it's because we started talking about Pentecostalism.

415
00:23:43.720 --> 00:23:47.640
<v Speaker 3>For sure, the Pentecostals are sending this the angels to

416
00:23:47.640 --> 00:23:50.839
<v Speaker 3>come attack us. Okay, so this sounds good now, So yeah,

417
00:23:50.839 --> 00:23:54.319
<v Speaker 3>so I have to do these workarounds anyway. So you know,

418
00:23:54.599 --> 00:23:56.920
<v Speaker 3>as you mentioned, Jude three says the faith was once

419
00:23:56.920 --> 00:23:59.000
<v Speaker 3>for all committed to the same scalations. One Paul says,

420
00:23:59.319 --> 00:24:01.200
<v Speaker 3>no one else can each a new Gospel other than

421
00:24:01.200 --> 00:24:03.119
<v Speaker 3>what I delivered. Well, that means there has to be

422
00:24:03.160 --> 00:24:06.880
<v Speaker 3>some finality to us delivered to judge anything, you know,

423
00:24:07.039 --> 00:24:11.279
<v Speaker 3>future wise on on this basis. And so even as

424
00:24:11.319 --> 00:24:14.799
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned when I was a Calvinist, you know, I realized, Okay,

425
00:24:14.839 --> 00:24:16.400
<v Speaker 3>there's got to be some kind of like you know,

426
00:24:16.519 --> 00:24:19.880
<v Speaker 3>finality to this, because you know, God.

427
00:24:19.720 --> 00:24:22.079
<v Speaker 4>Takes people that speak for him very seriously.

428
00:24:22.200 --> 00:24:25.720
<v Speaker 3>And when you've got ministers and preachers and people who

429
00:24:25.799 --> 00:24:29.200
<v Speaker 3>claim to be prophets getting things wrong or their word

430
00:24:29.200 --> 00:24:32.559
<v Speaker 3>of knowledge or their you know, their their prophetic statements

431
00:24:32.640 --> 00:24:35.720
<v Speaker 3>end up not being true. You know, in the charismatic world.

432
00:24:35.720 --> 00:24:38.039
<v Speaker 3>I was in there, not a long time, maybe a year,

433
00:24:38.279 --> 00:24:40.920
<v Speaker 3>but enough to see like, okay, this isn't really taken seriously,

434
00:24:41.559 --> 00:24:42.519
<v Speaker 3>Like you get this wrong.

435
00:24:42.880 --> 00:24:45.839
<v Speaker 4>It's like, oh, well, give us another shot here. Right. Well,

436
00:24:45.839 --> 00:24:48.880
<v Speaker 4>in scripture, right, the false prophets, as Jeremiah says, Prophet

437
00:24:48.920 --> 00:24:51.440
<v Speaker 4>I have a vision according to their own hearts and

438
00:24:51.519 --> 00:24:52.680
<v Speaker 4>not according to the Lord.

439
00:24:52.720 --> 00:24:54.160
<v Speaker 3>And I was like, that's what's actually what's going on

440
00:24:54.240 --> 00:24:56.920
<v Speaker 3>in a lot of these churches. So again, this is

441
00:24:56.960 --> 00:25:00.720
<v Speaker 3>all kind of uh, you know, old news to you.

442
00:25:00.839 --> 00:25:03.000
<v Speaker 3>But I think for people in the audience, we have

443
00:25:03.079 --> 00:25:04.799
<v Speaker 3>to keep hammering this home because.

444
00:25:04.519 --> 00:25:06.960
<v Speaker 4>Even after here's what you'll notice as.

445
00:25:06.880 --> 00:25:09.200
<v Speaker 3>You start to make content, Alex, I mean you're already

446
00:25:09.200 --> 00:25:13.119
<v Speaker 3>well into this. You will address a topic with the

447
00:25:13.200 --> 00:25:17.880
<v Speaker 3>utmost most precision for three hours, it will get tons

448
00:25:17.920 --> 00:25:20.640
<v Speaker 3>of views, and the next day you will have someone say,

449
00:25:20.839 --> 00:25:24.440
<v Speaker 3>when are you going to address pentecostalism with any precision?

450
00:25:24.480 --> 00:25:27.079
<v Speaker 3>It's like, dude, did you not just watch this? I mean,

451
00:25:27.279 --> 00:25:29.799
<v Speaker 3>so get ready for all of that. But anyway, back

452
00:25:29.799 --> 00:25:32.200
<v Speaker 3>to you, I'm sorry'm rambling. That's the whole sort of

453
00:25:32.319 --> 00:25:34.880
<v Speaker 3>idea of the finality of revelation. And then when I

454
00:25:34.920 --> 00:25:39.960
<v Speaker 3>started reading the Church Fathers, as you said, you start realizing, hey,

455
00:25:40.000 --> 00:25:42.480
<v Speaker 3>wait a minute, Montanous is like the same thing, and

456
00:25:42.519 --> 00:25:45.000
<v Speaker 3>he was condemned or in the second century. So did

457
00:25:45.039 --> 00:25:47.880
<v Speaker 3>you start to have any interest in the Church Fathers

458
00:25:48.119 --> 00:25:50.599
<v Speaker 3>at this period or was it just sort of the

459
00:25:50.640 --> 00:25:53.200
<v Speaker 3>problems of charismaticism that made you think, okay, this isn't it.

460
00:25:54.160 --> 00:25:57.200
<v Speaker 5>Well it was a bit of an extended pipeline. I guess. Basically,

461
00:25:57.599 --> 00:26:00.039
<v Speaker 5>I had this friend in Florida, who you know, he

462
00:26:00.079 --> 00:26:03.279
<v Speaker 5>did like seminary at Pentecostal Seminary. He had more of

463
00:26:03.319 --> 00:26:05.839
<v Speaker 5>an open mind to these kinds of things, and he

464
00:26:05.880 --> 00:26:09.240
<v Speaker 5>said he very much disliked that I was getting into Calvinism,

465
00:26:09.480 --> 00:26:11.400
<v Speaker 5>and he was like, you need to go read doctor

466
00:26:11.440 --> 00:26:14.240
<v Speaker 5>Michael Heiser's Unseen Realm because in the chapter there he

467
00:26:14.319 --> 00:26:18.519
<v Speaker 5>makes a pretty good case against determinism. And I know

468
00:26:18.839 --> 00:26:22.720
<v Speaker 5>Calvinists today try to like disavow the term determinism, but

469
00:26:22.880 --> 00:26:25.400
<v Speaker 5>I don't think there's really any work around with that.

470
00:26:27.240 --> 00:26:30.759
<v Speaker 5>But I read Michael Heiser's Unseen Realm, and then he

471
00:26:30.839 --> 00:26:33.279
<v Speaker 5>also recommended because it also talks about like the Divine

472
00:26:33.319 --> 00:26:37.519
<v Speaker 5>Council theology, Father Stephen Dejung's Religion of the Apostles Orthodox

473
00:26:37.599 --> 00:26:41.039
<v Speaker 5>Christianity in the first century. So going through Michael Heiser's

474
00:26:41.119 --> 00:26:43.960
<v Speaker 5>work and then putting an Orthodox lens on that, because

475
00:26:44.079 --> 00:26:47.960
<v Speaker 5>not everything Michael Heiser talks about is Orthodox, but then

476
00:26:48.000 --> 00:26:51.119
<v Speaker 5>putting an Orthodox lens to that through Father Stephen Deyong's

477
00:26:51.160 --> 00:26:53.680
<v Speaker 5>work was like, Wow, hold on a minute, there might

478
00:26:53.720 --> 00:26:56.599
<v Speaker 5>be something here. Like one of my big objections was

479
00:26:56.759 --> 00:26:59.359
<v Speaker 5>seeking the intercession of the Saints, which is the video

480
00:26:59.400 --> 00:27:04.359
<v Speaker 5>I dropped most recently, and the Divine Council theology makes

481
00:27:04.880 --> 00:27:08.000
<v Speaker 5>I think seeking the intercessions of those members on the

482
00:27:08.039 --> 00:27:12.359
<v Speaker 5>Divine Council feasible. So yeah, that was one of the

483
00:27:12.400 --> 00:27:15.119
<v Speaker 5>first pipelines to get me to considering it.

484
00:27:15.119 --> 00:27:15.279
<v Speaker 4>Well.

485
00:27:15.359 --> 00:27:17.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And you know, it's funny because I had a

486
00:27:17.319 --> 00:27:21.720
<v Speaker 3>different a different course into that realm, and I remember

487
00:27:21.759 --> 00:27:24.519
<v Speaker 3>that being an issue for me. But I went back

488
00:27:24.559 --> 00:27:27.279
<v Speaker 3>in two thousand and one and two into Catholicism. So

489
00:27:27.359 --> 00:27:31.519
<v Speaker 3>my path for that was hardcore Calvinist. And then I

490
00:27:31.559 --> 00:27:34.519
<v Speaker 3>read Scott Hans's book Marriage Supper of the Lamb, which

491
00:27:34.880 --> 00:27:37.759
<v Speaker 3>is actually still a decent book. You could actually get

492
00:27:37.799 --> 00:27:42.000
<v Speaker 3>some really good sort of liturgical argumentation and meet from

493
00:27:42.039 --> 00:27:44.680
<v Speaker 3>that text, even though obviously I'm not Roman Catholic, but

494
00:27:45.160 --> 00:27:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Marriage Upper of the Lamb really made me understand, oh

495
00:27:46.960 --> 00:27:49.680
<v Speaker 3>wait a minute, you know, I'm already a Calvinist preterist,

496
00:27:49.880 --> 00:27:50.680
<v Speaker 3>personal predist.

497
00:27:50.759 --> 00:27:51.640
<v Speaker 4>Here I believe.

498
00:27:51.480 --> 00:27:54.119
<v Speaker 3>Seventy a d was, you know, kind of the finality

499
00:27:54.119 --> 00:27:57.000
<v Speaker 3>of that introduction of the last days into the here

500
00:27:57.000 --> 00:28:00.160
<v Speaker 3>and the now they already not yet framework. And then

501
00:28:00.200 --> 00:28:02.279
<v Speaker 3>it was like, once you understood that, oh, we're actually

502
00:28:02.319 --> 00:28:05.039
<v Speaker 3>all part of the same family. Even those that have

503
00:28:05.119 --> 00:28:07.480
<v Speaker 3>gone on, and we're all part of the same worship

504
00:28:07.559 --> 00:28:10.880
<v Speaker 3>service even though they have gone on, you know, church

505
00:28:10.920 --> 00:28:14.480
<v Speaker 3>militant united with you know, church triumphant, and you know,

506
00:28:14.519 --> 00:28:16.279
<v Speaker 3>you read Hebrews eleven, you see that we're all part

507
00:28:16.279 --> 00:28:19.400
<v Speaker 3>of that same city. It kind of, you know, coalesced

508
00:28:19.440 --> 00:28:22.440
<v Speaker 3>for me, and you know, Revelations five through nine, you know,

509
00:28:22.680 --> 00:28:26.279
<v Speaker 3>clearly saying that it's again a large communal service with

510
00:28:26.319 --> 00:28:29.559
<v Speaker 3>all that liturgical imagery. Did the Book of Revelation play

511
00:28:29.599 --> 00:28:32.599
<v Speaker 3>a role for you in accepting that? Because for me

512
00:28:32.640 --> 00:28:33.640
<v Speaker 3>it was kind of the knockdown.

513
00:28:34.759 --> 00:28:38.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think so, because growing up in a Pentecostal background,

514
00:28:38.960 --> 00:28:42.000
<v Speaker 5>it was like obviously very dispensationalists. So it was like,

515
00:28:42.440 --> 00:28:44.960
<v Speaker 5>Revelation is this book that you can't really understand is

516
00:28:45.039 --> 00:28:47.480
<v Speaker 5>kind of unfolding. And the hermeneutic that you use to

517
00:28:47.559 --> 00:28:50.319
<v Speaker 5>understand Revelation is you take a news headline and you

518
00:28:50.359 --> 00:28:52.960
<v Speaker 5>compare that to a verse in Revelation, and it's like,

519
00:28:53.440 --> 00:28:55.839
<v Speaker 5>what can you get from comparing the news headlines and

520
00:28:55.920 --> 00:29:00.200
<v Speaker 5>the Book of Revelation that was written nineteen hundred years ago, whatever,

521
00:29:00.640 --> 00:29:04.839
<v Speaker 5>you know, And that's a bad hermeneutic really, as soon

522
00:29:04.880 --> 00:29:07.000
<v Speaker 5>as you know, I got interested in Orthodox He's starting

523
00:29:07.000 --> 00:29:09.240
<v Speaker 5>attended attending the liturgy. I was like, oh, hold on

524
00:29:09.279 --> 00:29:13.599
<v Speaker 5>a minute, this looks familiar. It was like, yeah, revelation

525
00:29:13.839 --> 00:29:17.079
<v Speaker 5>played a big role in that, that liturgical component, and

526
00:29:17.599 --> 00:29:23.279
<v Speaker 5>obviously other Orthodox influencers on YouTube like yourself, like Sarah

527
00:29:23.359 --> 00:29:25.440
<v Speaker 5>and Hamilton, I know, is big on this about this,

528
00:29:25.519 --> 00:29:29.200
<v Speaker 5>like sacramental worldview. I think that played a big role

529
00:29:29.279 --> 00:29:32.519
<v Speaker 5>as well as consuming all of this content from the

530
00:29:32.599 --> 00:29:34.759
<v Speaker 5>giants that have come before me. I guess and up

531
00:29:34.799 --> 00:29:35.319
<v Speaker 5>at out this.

532
00:29:35.759 --> 00:29:37.799
<v Speaker 3>Did you have a period of Calvinism or you were

533
00:29:37.839 --> 00:29:40.680
<v Speaker 3>just intellectually interested, but you didn't go into a Presbyterian

534
00:29:40.759 --> 00:29:41.359
<v Speaker 3>church or anything.

535
00:29:42.279 --> 00:29:46.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, it was around twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen when my

536
00:29:46.559 --> 00:29:50.079
<v Speaker 5>wife and I we joined like a non denom evangelical church.

537
00:29:50.160 --> 00:29:53.039
<v Speaker 5>We left the Pentecostal movement, so that was more of

538
00:29:53.079 --> 00:29:58.799
<v Speaker 5>a baptisty church as it would be like a reform disoteriology.

539
00:29:58.119 --> 00:30:02.039
<v Speaker 3>James White reform Baptist type idea. Yeah, yeah, yeah exactly.

540
00:30:03.759 --> 00:30:07.759
<v Speaker 5>And a few years after adjoining, you know, reading more

541
00:30:07.759 --> 00:30:10.359
<v Speaker 5>about church history, getting into the church fathers, there was

542
00:30:10.440 --> 00:30:13.759
<v Speaker 5>just like something I couldn't stand about this, like goofy

543
00:30:13.880 --> 00:30:16.880
<v Speaker 5>Calvinism anymore. I just couldn't stand hearing anything about it,

544
00:30:17.880 --> 00:30:20.200
<v Speaker 5>and I went to the leaders of that church and

545
00:30:20.200 --> 00:30:22.720
<v Speaker 5>that at that time, that was after Michael Heiser and

546
00:30:22.720 --> 00:30:25.240
<v Speaker 5>Stephen Deyong and I started going into the Church fathers.

547
00:30:25.359 --> 00:30:27.599
<v Speaker 5>My mindset kind of shifted, and I was like, forget

548
00:30:27.599 --> 00:30:30.119
<v Speaker 5>starting here and working backwards. Let's start from the Book

549
00:30:30.119 --> 00:30:32.359
<v Speaker 5>of Acts and move forwards. And I was like, let's

550
00:30:32.359 --> 00:30:34.640
<v Speaker 5>just get down like the first thousand years of church history.

551
00:30:34.720 --> 00:30:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's get that down and tell me about this because

552
00:30:36.480 --> 00:30:38.720
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned this with your interview with Cleve. You said

553
00:30:38.720 --> 00:30:44.000
<v Speaker 3>something about kind of a lawyer's approach to analytically looking

554
00:30:44.039 --> 00:30:47.079
<v Speaker 3>at each of the heresies as schisms historically.

555
00:30:47.119 --> 00:30:48.319
<v Speaker 4>Is that we said something like that.

556
00:30:49.079 --> 00:30:51.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so I guess the way my brain has been

557
00:30:51.960 --> 00:30:53.680
<v Speaker 5>trained was to look at all of these is like

558
00:30:54.000 --> 00:30:57.279
<v Speaker 5>court cases almost, so it'd be like Montanus versus you know,

559
00:30:57.359 --> 00:31:00.519
<v Speaker 5>the rest of the Church, or Arius v Alexander.

560
00:31:00.599 --> 00:31:02.279
<v Speaker 4>I think that's actually really genius.

561
00:31:02.319 --> 00:31:04.920
<v Speaker 3>That's actually you because I've never heard anyone think about

562
00:31:04.960 --> 00:31:06.680
<v Speaker 3>it this way, but it actually makes perfect sense.

563
00:31:07.720 --> 00:31:12.079
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, because I think folks today are very influenced by Papism,

564
00:31:12.200 --> 00:31:15.319
<v Speaker 5>Roman Catholicism, and they're under this assumption that councils like

565
00:31:15.440 --> 00:31:18.720
<v Speaker 5>declare dogmas, and that is one function, but it's not

566
00:31:18.759 --> 00:31:21.480
<v Speaker 5>like the main function I believe of a council is

567
00:31:21.519 --> 00:31:24.480
<v Speaker 5>to like resolve disputes and to like find the truth

568
00:31:24.680 --> 00:31:27.319
<v Speaker 5>out of this dispute. Right, you have areas who got

569
00:31:27.319 --> 00:31:29.880
<v Speaker 5>excommunicated by Saint Alexander of Alexandria.

570
00:31:30.160 --> 00:31:30.720
<v Speaker 4>Was that right?

571
00:31:30.880 --> 00:31:33.119
<v Speaker 5>You know what's going on here? What is the claim?

572
00:31:33.200 --> 00:31:35.200
<v Speaker 5>What is correct? And then out of that you get

573
00:31:35.240 --> 00:31:39.359
<v Speaker 5>the infallible dogma that we hold on to. But like

574
00:31:39.359 --> 00:31:41.519
<v Speaker 5>in law, there's a bunch of like, oh bitter dicta

575
00:31:41.839 --> 00:31:43.799
<v Speaker 5>in there as well that like, not everything from a

576
00:31:43.839 --> 00:31:46.759
<v Speaker 5>council is infallible. And when I heard you talking about that,

577
00:31:46.839 --> 00:31:49.039
<v Speaker 5>I was like, man, there are so many parallels in

578
00:31:49.079 --> 00:31:53.160
<v Speaker 5>this dispute resolution of mechanism within the Church to actual

579
00:31:53.200 --> 00:31:57.039
<v Speaker 5>modern law today, where not everything that the Supreme Court

580
00:31:57.039 --> 00:32:00.680
<v Speaker 5>says in their twenty six page opinions are binding on everybody,

581
00:32:00.799 --> 00:32:03.240
<v Speaker 5>Like they're of course very weighty, but the part that

582
00:32:03.279 --> 00:32:05.880
<v Speaker 5>you take out is like the actual decision, the holding,

583
00:32:05.960 --> 00:32:08.599
<v Speaker 5>which the parallel to that in orthodoxy would be the dogma.

584
00:32:08.839 --> 00:32:12.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, and key point here too, And I meant

585
00:32:12.079 --> 00:32:14.680
<v Speaker 3>to mention this in today's earlier interview when we were

586
00:32:14.799 --> 00:32:16.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of working through some of the Econmenical councils in

587
00:32:16.960 --> 00:32:19.720
<v Speaker 3>regard to Christology and later you know, fifth and six

588
00:32:20.799 --> 00:32:24.160
<v Speaker 3>Council condinations of you know, monel, thelitism and that kind

589
00:32:24.200 --> 00:32:28.440
<v Speaker 3>of stuff. It's funny that in the in the Roman

590
00:32:28.480 --> 00:32:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Catholic mindset, if you if you really thought that the

591
00:32:31.000 --> 00:32:33.519
<v Speaker 3>Church of the first thousand years was papal and was

592
00:32:33.599 --> 00:32:36.920
<v Speaker 3>Roman Catholic, why all these debates, why why all of

593
00:32:36.960 --> 00:32:41.359
<v Speaker 3>this arguing the nuances of Christology and mono, thelitism and

594
00:32:41.400 --> 00:32:44.039
<v Speaker 3>this and that, Like all anyone had to do was

595
00:32:44.119 --> 00:32:47.920
<v Speaker 3>just so we were talking about the difference in the

596
00:32:47.960 --> 00:32:51.480
<v Speaker 3>attitude between the Roman Catholic approach today and we're going

597
00:32:51.559 --> 00:32:54.359
<v Speaker 3>to talk about replying replying to Roman Catholics here in

598
00:32:54.359 --> 00:32:57.359
<v Speaker 3>a moment, you know, we were just we were discussing

599
00:32:57.359 --> 00:33:00.519
<v Speaker 3>the idea that you know, the early Church, uh, in

600
00:33:00.519 --> 00:33:03.480
<v Speaker 3>the early ecumenical councils, it would have been so much

601
00:33:03.480 --> 00:33:06.440
<v Speaker 3>easier to just ask the Pope what the right answer

602
00:33:06.599 --> 00:33:09.599
<v Speaker 3>is the why all of these disputes, all this nuance,

603
00:33:09.640 --> 00:33:12.799
<v Speaker 3>all this terminology, when we could have just simply said

604
00:33:12.880 --> 00:33:14.759
<v Speaker 3>ron tell us what's right, and then we all because

605
00:33:14.759 --> 00:33:17.440
<v Speaker 3>we all we're all papists, like, clearly this is the

606
00:33:17.519 --> 00:33:22.559
<v Speaker 3>easiest route to resolving disputes. But instead we have very

607
00:33:23.759 --> 00:33:31.160
<v Speaker 3>dogged debates, very abstruse discussions about very difficult theological nuances

608
00:33:31.200 --> 00:33:34.480
<v Speaker 3>and technicalities, and so that shows us. I think that again,

609
00:33:34.640 --> 00:33:37.079
<v Speaker 3>the whole ethos of the first thousand years is clearly

610
00:33:37.119 --> 00:33:41.039
<v Speaker 3>the orthodox to Nodal model, not the Roman Catholic default

611
00:33:41.039 --> 00:33:45.160
<v Speaker 3>autocratic model, which you know, as you're pointing out, like

612
00:33:45.559 --> 00:33:49.119
<v Speaker 3>why there's other things going, like the councils themselves. The

613
00:33:49.160 --> 00:33:52.440
<v Speaker 3>process of the councils shows us so much more than

614
00:33:52.759 --> 00:33:56.359
<v Speaker 3>just like the sort of clipping copy paste, Oh here's

615
00:33:56.400 --> 00:33:59.119
<v Speaker 3>the dogma, that's all that matters, right, Well, for example,

616
00:34:00.039 --> 00:34:02.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, if you look at Constantinople one, you can't

617
00:34:02.519 --> 00:34:06.440
<v Speaker 3>separate the pronunciation of the council from the theology of

618
00:34:06.440 --> 00:34:09.920
<v Speaker 3>the Cappadocians and especially Saint Gregornossa. And you know, if

619
00:34:09.920 --> 00:34:12.360
<v Speaker 3>you have like a romanctholic mindset as an example, you

620
00:34:12.400 --> 00:34:14.480
<v Speaker 3>can just sort of clip out what you want and

621
00:34:14.559 --> 00:34:17.039
<v Speaker 3>say you don't really care about like Basil and the

622
00:34:17.039 --> 00:34:20.679
<v Speaker 3>Cappidocean model of you know, the monarchical trinitarian view. I

623
00:34:20.800 --> 00:34:24.559
<v Speaker 3>only care about the dogmatic pronouncement. And ironically, protests are

624
00:34:24.559 --> 00:34:26.360
<v Speaker 3>the exact same thing as the papist when it comes

625
00:34:26.360 --> 00:34:29.880
<v Speaker 3>to these councils and they say, uh, you know, I

626
00:34:30.000 --> 00:34:32.360
<v Speaker 3>like what Athanasius said here about the deed of Christ.

627
00:34:32.599 --> 00:34:34.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't care what the Canons of Nicia teach about

628
00:34:34.840 --> 00:34:38.239
<v Speaker 3>the Eucharist and deacons and the episcopate. All of that

629
00:34:38.320 --> 00:34:41.199
<v Speaker 3>is irrelevant to me. I just like this part. Papist

630
00:34:41.599 --> 00:34:44.679
<v Speaker 3>exact singing are like this part. And really, ironically, it's

631
00:34:44.719 --> 00:34:48.159
<v Speaker 3>only the Orthodox Church that is actually still doing the

632
00:34:48.199 --> 00:34:49.039
<v Speaker 3>sonodal model.

633
00:34:50.400 --> 00:34:50.599
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

634
00:34:50.639 --> 00:34:53.760
<v Speaker 5>I think it's the only worldview that has successfully synthesized

635
00:34:54.559 --> 00:34:58.000
<v Speaker 5>all of these things together into a coherent worldview. And

636
00:34:58.199 --> 00:35:00.440
<v Speaker 5>they do this especially with the Holy Script. Sure you

637
00:35:00.480 --> 00:35:05.360
<v Speaker 5>know this redefining this doctrinal development. See it in Protestantism,

638
00:35:05.440 --> 00:35:08.079
<v Speaker 5>you see it in Papism. I think Holy Orthodoxy is

639
00:35:08.079 --> 00:35:11.760
<v Speaker 5>the only worldview that has successfully integrated all these things

640
00:35:11.760 --> 00:35:14.119
<v Speaker 5>together because it's true.

641
00:35:13.920 --> 00:35:14.400
<v Speaker 4>It's right.

642
00:35:15.039 --> 00:35:17.599
<v Speaker 5>Probably helps to win when you're winning a debate, to

643
00:35:17.719 --> 00:35:19.519
<v Speaker 5>actually be in the right position.

644
00:35:21.000 --> 00:35:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's get back to your to your journey. So

645
00:35:24.320 --> 00:35:28.559
<v Speaker 3>as COVID's happened. You're investigating the Church fathers. Now where

646
00:35:28.679 --> 00:35:31.039
<v Speaker 3>when you say that and we all kind of go

647
00:35:31.159 --> 00:35:34.039
<v Speaker 3>through that, you know, not that we don't we're not

648
00:35:34.079 --> 00:35:36.440
<v Speaker 3>still interested in the Church Fathers. But I think there's

649
00:35:36.480 --> 00:35:39.360
<v Speaker 3>a freshness and a newness when you're an Evangelic or

650
00:35:39.400 --> 00:35:41.400
<v Speaker 3>a Protestant and you begin to read the Church Fathers.

651
00:35:41.519 --> 00:35:44.039
<v Speaker 3>I started with things like Jerome, Saint Jerome, I started

652
00:35:44.039 --> 00:35:47.239
<v Speaker 3>with Augustin, and I started with Ambrose, all the Latin fathers.

653
00:35:47.719 --> 00:35:50.239
<v Speaker 3>I did read Athanasius very early on, back in about

654
00:35:50.239 --> 00:35:53.440
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and one, and I was pretty quickly kind

655
00:35:53.440 --> 00:35:57.000
<v Speaker 3>of struck with like, Okay, they're not Calvinists, they're not Protestant.

656
00:35:57.719 --> 00:36:02.159
<v Speaker 3>What was your your journey to the Patristic era writings

657
00:36:02.199 --> 00:36:03.119
<v Speaker 3>and how did that go?

658
00:36:04.360 --> 00:36:04.519
<v Speaker 4>Well?

659
00:36:04.519 --> 00:36:09.400
<v Speaker 5>I got this like little anthology by this Anglican scholar Betenson,

660
00:36:10.559 --> 00:36:15.599
<v Speaker 5>who has like little snippets from each church father for

661
00:36:15.639 --> 00:36:17.239
<v Speaker 5>like the first three hundred years, and it's like, what

662
00:36:17.280 --> 00:36:20.960
<v Speaker 5>did Basil teach on soteriology? Okay, what did Gregory of

663
00:36:21.039 --> 00:36:23.159
<v Speaker 5>Nissa teach on soteriology? And it's kind of like a

664
00:36:23.199 --> 00:36:26.719
<v Speaker 5>systematized little snippets a quote mine I guess, but a

665
00:36:26.760 --> 00:36:31.159
<v Speaker 5>well intentioned academic quote mine. And I was struck by

666
00:36:31.159 --> 00:36:34.719
<v Speaker 5>a passage from Saint Ignatius that said, if you follow

667
00:36:34.800 --> 00:36:40.239
<v Speaker 5>a man who causes a schism, you have what hope

668
00:36:40.320 --> 00:36:42.239
<v Speaker 5>is there for you? For salvation? And I was like,

669
00:36:42.320 --> 00:36:46.440
<v Speaker 5>holy cow, Like that is the entire Protestant movement, the

670
00:36:46.440 --> 00:36:48.719
<v Speaker 5>whole thing. And then it's like, maybe I should go

671
00:36:48.800 --> 00:36:50.800
<v Speaker 5>and like look at all of these schisms and see

672
00:36:50.840 --> 00:36:53.639
<v Speaker 5>which one makes the most sense in each schism. And

673
00:36:53.639 --> 00:36:57.519
<v Speaker 5>that's when I took that like, uh, that case law

674
00:36:57.639 --> 00:37:00.519
<v Speaker 5>loyally approach where it was like, okay, we have two parties,

675
00:37:00.760 --> 00:37:03.679
<v Speaker 5>so somebody's making an argument here, somebody's making an argument here.

676
00:37:03.840 --> 00:37:06.079
<v Speaker 5>What did the council decide and what was their reasoning

677
00:37:06.159 --> 00:37:07.840
<v Speaker 5>for it? And trying to put them into the form

678
00:37:07.840 --> 00:37:11.320
<v Speaker 5>of like a narrative or a case for lack of

679
00:37:11.320 --> 00:37:12.960
<v Speaker 5>better terms.

680
00:37:12.920 --> 00:37:15.679
<v Speaker 3>And what as you're doing this, as you're going through

681
00:37:15.719 --> 00:37:16.760
<v Speaker 3>these heresies.

682
00:37:16.360 --> 00:37:17.760
<v Speaker 4>And by the way, how far did you go up?

683
00:37:17.760 --> 00:37:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Did you go all the way up to like the

684
00:37:18.800 --> 00:37:21.760
<v Speaker 3>eighth ninth century or like what where did that process

685
00:37:21.800 --> 00:37:24.000
<v Speaker 3>of kind of doing the legal analysis end?

686
00:37:25.159 --> 00:37:29.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, it was focused mostly on the seven Ecumenical councils uh.

687
00:37:29.719 --> 00:37:32.320
<v Speaker 5>And then after that, you know, I started making my

688
00:37:32.360 --> 00:37:34.760
<v Speaker 5>way back to the Reformation. But by the time I

689
00:37:34.800 --> 00:37:38.320
<v Speaker 5>got to like the fifth sixth Council, I had a

690
00:37:38.320 --> 00:37:44.039
<v Speaker 5>lot of questions for my non denom baptisty evangelical pastors,

691
00:37:44.480 --> 00:37:47.840
<v Speaker 5>and I had a few conversations with them, and you know,

692
00:37:48.239 --> 00:37:52.159
<v Speaker 5>nice people interpersonally, but I was shocked, Jay, I was

693
00:37:52.199 --> 00:37:56.199
<v Speaker 5>shocked that these people have mdivs and doctoral level degrees.

694
00:37:56.800 --> 00:38:01.000
<v Speaker 5>And if I talk about, like, hey, doesn't monothelaticism from

695
00:38:01.000 --> 00:38:05.559
<v Speaker 5>the sixth Ecumenical Council sound a bit like monargism and conversion,

696
00:38:06.800 --> 00:38:09.039
<v Speaker 5>they look at me like I'm speaking another language, Like

697
00:38:09.079 --> 00:38:11.679
<v Speaker 5>they have no clue what I'm talking about, like not

698
00:38:11.760 --> 00:38:13.760
<v Speaker 5>an idea in the world. And I was like, man,

699
00:38:13.800 --> 00:38:16.599
<v Speaker 5>these people have been short changed by their seminaries. So

700
00:38:16.639 --> 00:38:19.519
<v Speaker 5>I started wondering, like, what do they teach in seminaries

701
00:38:19.559 --> 00:38:23.760
<v Speaker 5>these days? And it's not historical theology. That's that's like

702
00:38:23.840 --> 00:38:28.360
<v Speaker 5>a specialty for sub PhD graduate project. They teach you

703
00:38:28.400 --> 00:38:33.559
<v Speaker 5>about like building organizations, mobilizing volunteers, trying to build a church,

704
00:38:33.840 --> 00:38:37.000
<v Speaker 5>involving the community. It's not so much about theology as

705
00:38:37.000 --> 00:38:38.519
<v Speaker 5>you would think it is maybe.

706
00:38:38.280 --> 00:38:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Back in the way I remember very well. I mean

707
00:38:40.800 --> 00:38:44.119
<v Speaker 3>I was at a Baptist school. I remember over Christmas break,

708
00:38:44.199 --> 00:38:47.280
<v Speaker 3>I was there for two weeks kind of alone, and

709
00:38:47.880 --> 00:38:50.159
<v Speaker 3>I read almost all of the City of God in

710
00:38:50.199 --> 00:38:52.159
<v Speaker 3>that two weeks, and I wrote down a bunch of

711
00:38:52.280 --> 00:38:54.760
<v Speaker 3>questions and I took it to I even remember who

712
00:38:54.800 --> 00:38:56.599
<v Speaker 3>the professor were. This's like back in like the year

713
00:38:56.639 --> 00:39:01.559
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and doctor hawt Ostrender and doctor Chad Brand,

714
00:39:02.000 --> 00:39:04.679
<v Speaker 3>and I think they're still Baptist pastors. But I took

715
00:39:04.719 --> 00:39:07.639
<v Speaker 3>my questions out of City of God to them, and

716
00:39:07.719 --> 00:39:11.559
<v Speaker 3>it was just like like they'd never even thought about like,

717
00:39:11.639 --> 00:39:15.519
<v Speaker 3>wait a minute, wait, Augustine says that. Augustine says, what

718
00:39:15.559 --> 00:39:17.599
<v Speaker 3>about the real I thought he was our guy. Yeah,

719
00:39:17.599 --> 00:39:19.559
<v Speaker 3>they were sort of yeah, like what so I think

720
00:39:19.599 --> 00:39:21.800
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of even in the academic realm of

721
00:39:21.800 --> 00:39:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Protestantism and Evangelicalism, there's just this assumption that, oh, yeah, Augustine,

722
00:39:25.440 --> 00:39:28.840
<v Speaker 3>he's our guy, and that's you know, Athanasius, he's our guy.

723
00:39:29.159 --> 00:39:29.639
<v Speaker 4>But then you.

724
00:39:29.599 --> 00:39:33.079
<v Speaker 3>Actually start to read the letters, festal letters, you know,

725
00:39:33.119 --> 00:39:35.280
<v Speaker 3>this kind of stuff, the councils, and you start to realize,

726
00:39:35.280 --> 00:39:38.800
<v Speaker 3>wait a minute, I'm not at all like in this domain.

727
00:39:39.000 --> 00:39:42.480
<v Speaker 3>And you know I made the mistake, you know, without

728
00:39:42.519 --> 00:39:44.639
<v Speaker 3>knowing any better back in two thousand and one two three,

729
00:39:44.760 --> 00:39:48.199
<v Speaker 3>of just thinking oh, it's either Protestant or Roman Catholic,

730
00:39:49.360 --> 00:39:52.000
<v Speaker 3>and later you know, got a lot more sophisticated than God.

731
00:39:52.079 --> 00:39:55.000
<v Speaker 3>But what was it that, as you're reading their church

732
00:39:55.039 --> 00:39:57.559
<v Speaker 3>fathers made you not go to the Roman Catholic.

733
00:39:59.480 --> 00:40:01.880
<v Speaker 5>It was how they acted. You know, people say all

734
00:40:01.960 --> 00:40:05.960
<v Speaker 5>kinds of things, right, there's honorifics, there's flattery, like unfortunately,

735
00:40:06.000 --> 00:40:07.599
<v Speaker 5>it's just a part of it that the Church on

736
00:40:07.719 --> 00:40:09.960
<v Speaker 5>earth is has like a human element to it. So

737
00:40:10.000 --> 00:40:13.519
<v Speaker 5>there you're gonna see flattery in letters. But you know,

738
00:40:13.599 --> 00:40:17.679
<v Speaker 5>all the things that the Papists will use to support

739
00:40:17.719 --> 00:40:21.679
<v Speaker 5>their claim that Rome had universal, unhindered jurisdiction over all

740
00:40:21.719 --> 00:40:24.679
<v Speaker 5>the faithful, throughout the entire church, and they weren't subject

741
00:40:24.719 --> 00:40:27.719
<v Speaker 5>to review by anybody. Every single quote you can find

742
00:40:27.719 --> 00:40:30.719
<v Speaker 5>an identical quote about another church. I think Saint Basil's

743
00:40:30.800 --> 00:40:33.360
<v Speaker 5>Late Letters where he's talking about the Church in Antioch says,

744
00:40:33.480 --> 00:40:35.360
<v Speaker 5>the church in Antioch is the head of the church.

745
00:40:35.480 --> 00:40:38.360
<v Speaker 5>What will the church do the body without its head?

746
00:40:38.480 --> 00:40:41.239
<v Speaker 5>We need to have malicious Saint Malicius as the bishop

747
00:40:41.280 --> 00:40:44.280
<v Speaker 5>in Antioch. He's trying to get Saint Athanasius on his side.

748
00:40:44.760 --> 00:40:48.800
<v Speaker 5>And so you can't really put too much weight in

749
00:40:48.840 --> 00:40:51.719
<v Speaker 5>these like political movements where they're trying to persuade somebody.

750
00:40:51.800 --> 00:40:53.760
<v Speaker 5>You have to look at what they actually do. So

751
00:40:54.199 --> 00:40:56.320
<v Speaker 5>in Roman Catholicism, I was like, Okay, if I were

752
00:40:56.360 --> 00:40:59.440
<v Speaker 5>to join Roman Catholicism today, what am I signing up for?

753
00:41:00.000 --> 00:41:03.440
<v Speaker 5>And I just read through Pastor returnis in my legal mind,

754
00:41:03.599 --> 00:41:05.639
<v Speaker 5>the phrase that stuck out to me is that the

755
00:41:05.760 --> 00:41:09.400
<v Speaker 5>Roman See is not subject to review by anybody. And

756
00:41:09.440 --> 00:41:11.679
<v Speaker 5>the corollary to that in the American court system is

757
00:41:11.719 --> 00:41:14.559
<v Speaker 5>the supreme court. It is not subject to review by anybody.

758
00:41:14.639 --> 00:41:17.920
<v Speaker 5>It's the highest authority. And Pastor Returnists actually uses that

759
00:41:18.000 --> 00:41:21.440
<v Speaker 5>term unsurpassed authority. They are saying that the Roman See

760
00:41:21.480 --> 00:41:25.480
<v Speaker 5>is the supreme court in the church, and you just

761
00:41:25.559 --> 00:41:29.280
<v Speaker 5>don't see anyone acting that way. Like one proof that

762
00:41:29.320 --> 00:41:32.920
<v Speaker 5>they like to use is Pope Celestine and how he

763
00:41:33.000 --> 00:41:37.239
<v Speaker 5>excommunicated Nestorius prior to the Third Council. Okay, well, why

764
00:41:37.280 --> 00:41:40.840
<v Speaker 5>do we have a review from scratch of that entire decision?

765
00:41:41.000 --> 00:41:43.719
<v Speaker 5>They totally disregard Rome's decision, and then in the third

766
00:41:43.719 --> 00:41:48.079
<v Speaker 5>Acumenical Council they relitigate the entire issue from scratch, and

767
00:41:48.679 --> 00:41:51.920
<v Speaker 5>Mystorius is not treated as somebody who's excommunicated. He's treated

768
00:41:51.960 --> 00:41:54.440
<v Speaker 5>as a bishop in good standing at the beginning of

769
00:41:54.440 --> 00:41:55.000
<v Speaker 5>that council.

770
00:41:55.400 --> 00:41:57.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, six nine.

771
00:41:57.159 --> 00:42:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Why would you redo this at Constantinople if Pope Martin

772
00:42:02.519 --> 00:42:04.559
<v Speaker 3>at latter in six forty nine has already ruled on

773
00:42:04.559 --> 00:42:05.239
<v Speaker 3>the issue.

774
00:42:06.079 --> 00:42:08.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so we see right away that like, hey, these

775
00:42:08.360 --> 00:42:10.840
<v Speaker 5>claims that Rome is making about their role in the

776
00:42:10.920 --> 00:42:14.840
<v Speaker 5>church is just not true. It's nobody acted that way. Uh,

777
00:42:15.440 --> 00:42:17.800
<v Speaker 5>maybe later on they have some claims, and that's I

778
00:42:17.800 --> 00:42:19.920
<v Speaker 5>think that's why they have to get into the minutia

779
00:42:20.039 --> 00:42:23.599
<v Speaker 5>of the Latin and like, didn't Saint Maximus the Confessor

780
00:42:24.000 --> 00:42:27.199
<v Speaker 5>like teach that Rome was divinely inspired. Well, there's another

781
00:42:27.239 --> 00:42:31.000
<v Speaker 5>bishop that says the patriarchy in Jerusalem is also divinely

782
00:42:31.159 --> 00:42:35.719
<v Speaker 5>or divinely founded, I think has divine foundation. So you

783
00:42:35.800 --> 00:42:39.400
<v Speaker 5>have all this flowery, honorific language going either way. Okay,

784
00:42:39.559 --> 00:42:42.519
<v Speaker 5>that's fine. What did they do? How did they act?

785
00:42:43.559 --> 00:42:45.440
<v Speaker 5>And they didn't act in a way that's conducive to

786
00:42:45.480 --> 00:42:46.480
<v Speaker 5>the Roman Catholic paper. Well.

787
00:42:46.519 --> 00:42:48.280
<v Speaker 3>The other thing too is I've noticed amongst the Roman

788
00:42:48.320 --> 00:42:53.199
<v Speaker 3>Catholic apologists that there's a heavy, heavy tendency, especially in

789
00:42:53.199 --> 00:42:58.320
<v Speaker 3>the last five years of this discourse. And I've been

790
00:42:58.440 --> 00:43:03.960
<v Speaker 3>in this, you know, contra Roman Catholic Roman pro Roman

791
00:43:04.000 --> 00:43:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Catholic discourse since two thousand and one, two thousand, right,

792
00:43:07.280 --> 00:43:08.840
<v Speaker 3>and there is when I really started getting into these

793
00:43:08.880 --> 00:43:12.119
<v Speaker 3>kinds of apologetics, and I noticed that it's gotten less

794
00:43:12.119 --> 00:43:17.679
<v Speaker 3>and less academic, and it's actually more and more, at

795
00:43:17.719 --> 00:43:22.639
<v Speaker 3>least on the internet sphere, like not even polemical. It's

796
00:43:22.679 --> 00:43:27.000
<v Speaker 3>just more like me meme war fare now because the

797
00:43:27.480 --> 00:43:30.320
<v Speaker 3>domain of the Roman Catholic apologists actually they tend to

798
00:43:30.400 --> 00:43:35.000
<v Speaker 3>just completely ignore any counter objections. And you know, when

799
00:43:35.000 --> 00:43:37.119
<v Speaker 3>it comes to the way that we approach these topics,

800
00:43:37.119 --> 00:43:39.039
<v Speaker 3>I think we do pretty good on the Orthodox side

801
00:43:39.079 --> 00:43:43.440
<v Speaker 3>of dealing with the steelman of the Roman Catholic position. Okay,

802
00:43:43.639 --> 00:43:47.920
<v Speaker 3>what's their strongest case. It's going to be, you know, Hormizdus,

803
00:43:48.000 --> 00:43:51.400
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be Pope Bagatho's letter, right, So we're

804
00:43:51.400 --> 00:43:53.119
<v Speaker 3>going to have to work through and deal with these

805
00:43:53.559 --> 00:43:57.079
<v Speaker 3>the Roman Catholice position. They don't even address the things

806
00:43:57.119 --> 00:43:59.280
<v Speaker 3>that we bring up. It's never touched on, at least

807
00:43:59.639 --> 00:44:02.159
<v Speaker 3>not in a lot of what I see. Maybe Jolene

808
00:44:02.199 --> 00:44:05.039
<v Speaker 3>Heshmeier has touched on it. I don't know, but we're

809
00:44:05.039 --> 00:44:06.440
<v Speaker 3>going to talk about that here in a bit. But

810
00:44:07.400 --> 00:44:08.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I just feel like they're just sort of

811
00:44:09.000 --> 00:44:14.039
<v Speaker 3>breezing past and they've long given up steelmanning the positions,

812
00:44:14.159 --> 00:44:16.280
<v Speaker 3>at least from the majority of their apologists.

813
00:44:17.440 --> 00:44:17.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

814
00:44:17.719 --> 00:44:19.840
<v Speaker 5>So, like I said at the beginning of our talk

815
00:44:19.880 --> 00:44:22.880
<v Speaker 5>here that like when a lawyer will like analyze this,

816
00:44:22.880 --> 00:44:25.880
<v Speaker 5>they'll be like, Okay, what are the facts, like what happened?

817
00:44:26.079 --> 00:44:27.800
<v Speaker 5>And then like what is the law? What is the

818
00:44:27.880 --> 00:44:31.480
<v Speaker 5>principle that you can draw out of what happened? So

819
00:44:32.440 --> 00:44:36.039
<v Speaker 5>my investigation at first was like, okay, objectively what happened?

820
00:44:36.079 --> 00:44:38.440
<v Speaker 5>And I went to I have Philip Schaff's eight volume

821
00:44:38.480 --> 00:44:40.760
<v Speaker 5>set on the history of the Church. He's Protestant, he

822
00:44:40.800 --> 00:44:42.679
<v Speaker 5>doesn't have a bone in this fight to be Roman

823
00:44:42.719 --> 00:44:46.719
<v Speaker 5>Catholic or Orthodox, and I have a few other historical

824
00:44:46.719 --> 00:44:49.480
<v Speaker 5>books up there. And if you just read the source

825
00:44:49.519 --> 00:44:52.719
<v Speaker 5>documents themselves too, like nobody is going out of their

826
00:44:52.760 --> 00:44:55.199
<v Speaker 5>way to submit to Rome. So when I went on

827
00:44:55.239 --> 00:44:59.039
<v Speaker 5>this like fact finding expedition, like what exactly, Like, let's

828
00:44:59.039 --> 00:45:01.880
<v Speaker 5>get to the bottom of this, what happened? It seemed

829
00:45:01.960 --> 00:45:04.679
<v Speaker 5>very clear to me that like Roman Catholicism, that is

830
00:45:04.719 --> 00:45:08.679
<v Speaker 5>not the correct church. It's not the church that you

831
00:45:08.719 --> 00:45:11.519
<v Speaker 5>see for the first one thousand years. Certainly an innovation.

832
00:45:12.000 --> 00:45:14.920
<v Speaker 5>And then that brought me to wholly orthodoxy, and of

833
00:45:14.960 --> 00:45:19.079
<v Speaker 5>course I investigated, you know, the non Calcedonian positions a bit.

834
00:45:19.119 --> 00:45:21.000
<v Speaker 5>I just couldn't get over the tertien quid. And it

835
00:45:21.079 --> 00:45:24.000
<v Speaker 5>really seems like they don't even really understand what their

836
00:45:24.000 --> 00:45:26.440
<v Speaker 5>own position is, right. I'm like, I don't want to

837
00:45:26.480 --> 00:45:28.440
<v Speaker 5>talk too much smack here. I try to hold myself

838
00:45:28.440 --> 00:45:30.239
<v Speaker 5>out as the ironic one. When I've been doing this

839
00:45:30.280 --> 00:45:32.360
<v Speaker 5>for twenty years, like Jay has, then I can bring

840
00:45:32.400 --> 00:45:35.000
<v Speaker 5>myself to be like a little more curmudgeony here. But

841
00:45:35.519 --> 00:45:37.880
<v Speaker 5>I really just I don't think they understand what their

842
00:45:37.920 --> 00:45:40.079
<v Speaker 5>position is. Whenever I hear them talk about it, it's

843
00:45:40.119 --> 00:45:43.559
<v Speaker 5>just like, okay, so a composite nature and they're like, no,

844
00:45:43.639 --> 00:45:46.199
<v Speaker 5>not exactly, it's okay, what are you saying. And then

845
00:45:46.440 --> 00:45:48.239
<v Speaker 5>because I did catch a bit of the stream earlier,

846
00:45:48.320 --> 00:45:50.880
<v Speaker 5>I understand why Kai is like, hey, you need to

847
00:45:50.880 --> 00:45:53.079
<v Speaker 5>write down what you believe, because I don't know what

848
00:45:53.159 --> 00:45:54.960
<v Speaker 5>you believe. I can't engage in a debate with you

849
00:45:55.039 --> 00:45:56.840
<v Speaker 5>if I don't know your position. I don't want to

850
00:45:56.880 --> 00:45:58.239
<v Speaker 5>be swinging at ghosts here.

851
00:46:00.159 --> 00:46:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let's talk a little bit about some of the

852
00:46:03.519 --> 00:46:06.599
<v Speaker 3>material that you produced lately, because I've been enjoying some

853
00:46:06.679 --> 00:46:09.639
<v Speaker 3>of these videos, and you know, you hit on topics

854
00:46:09.679 --> 00:46:11.199
<v Speaker 3>even in insights that that I miss.

855
00:46:11.239 --> 00:46:12.840
<v Speaker 4>And that's a great thing about Orthodoxy is.

856
00:46:12.800 --> 00:46:15.639
<v Speaker 3>That you know, we're not like we follow that one guy, right,

857
00:46:15.679 --> 00:46:21.000
<v Speaker 3>we have a very sonodal, very diffused gifts idea that

858
00:46:21.559 --> 00:46:25.599
<v Speaker 3>you know, even as somebody who is not you know,

859
00:46:25.760 --> 00:46:28.280
<v Speaker 3>hasn't been in the church for twenty years, they can

860
00:46:28.719 --> 00:46:31.760
<v Speaker 3>even as a new comer, they can have insights, wisdom

861
00:46:32.000 --> 00:46:34.639
<v Speaker 3>and takes and new information that you know, even somebody

862
00:46:34.639 --> 00:46:38.320
<v Speaker 3>who's been studying the stuff for decades can can miss.

863
00:46:38.440 --> 00:46:40.840
<v Speaker 3>So we always have to be humble and try to

864
00:46:40.840 --> 00:46:43.679
<v Speaker 3>be teachable about God's grace as best we can. You

865
00:46:43.960 --> 00:46:47.760
<v Speaker 3>responded to Joel Heshmeyer Joe Heshmeyer, whatever it is, and

866
00:46:48.840 --> 00:46:51.760
<v Speaker 3>in an excellent video, And so let's walk through a

867
00:46:51.760 --> 00:46:54.679
<v Speaker 3>few of these because I noticed as I watch his

868
00:46:54.800 --> 00:46:58.400
<v Speaker 3>video and then your response it was, it was he

869
00:46:58.440 --> 00:47:00.760
<v Speaker 3>did a little bit better than the sort of rumman

870
00:47:00.760 --> 00:47:03.159
<v Speaker 3>caltholcy pop apologist does. I'll give him some credit for

871
00:47:03.239 --> 00:47:05.559
<v Speaker 3>at least, you know, putting a little bit more time

872
00:47:05.599 --> 00:47:08.679
<v Speaker 3>and effort into some the argumentation. But let's talk about

873
00:47:09.000 --> 00:47:11.880
<v Speaker 3>strong points and arguments that he relied on, and then

874
00:47:11.880 --> 00:47:12.960
<v Speaker 3>some of your responses.

875
00:47:13.920 --> 00:47:27.440
<v Speaker 5>Sure well, I guess one of the parts from Joe's

876
00:47:27.519 --> 00:47:30.039
<v Speaker 5>video that stuck out to me was I think one

877
00:47:30.079 --> 00:47:33.920
<v Speaker 5>of the strongest points he made maybe was about how

878
00:47:33.920 --> 00:47:36.559
<v Speaker 5>can we identify what an ecumenical council is? And he

879
00:47:36.559 --> 00:47:40.559
<v Speaker 5>brought up the Council of Florence And for me, I

880
00:47:40.599 --> 00:47:42.679
<v Speaker 5>that was a bit of a stumbling block at first,

881
00:47:42.760 --> 00:47:45.199
<v Speaker 5>because it was like, Okay, did we accept you know,

882
00:47:45.239 --> 00:47:49.039
<v Speaker 5>the phillyoquay and all these papal claims or not. So

883
00:47:49.119 --> 00:47:51.000
<v Speaker 5>I actually I came across a stream with you and

884
00:47:51.079 --> 00:47:54.519
<v Speaker 5>David Hrhon talking about this issue, and there are a

885
00:47:54.519 --> 00:47:57.679
<v Speaker 5>few book recommendations there, and like, guys, don't get me wrong,

886
00:47:57.760 --> 00:48:00.440
<v Speaker 5>Streams are great, Podcasts are great, you can learn a lot,

887
00:48:00.480 --> 00:48:03.599
<v Speaker 5>but nothing replaces buying the book and actually doing the

888
00:48:03.639 --> 00:48:08.159
<v Speaker 5>work yourself and actually going through underlining, notating and interacting

889
00:48:08.199 --> 00:48:10.920
<v Speaker 5>with the material of yourself. So I bought a few books,

890
00:48:10.960 --> 00:48:14.599
<v Speaker 5>and Ostromov's book on the Council of Florence I think

891
00:48:14.679 --> 00:48:15.480
<v Speaker 5>was very enlightening.

892
00:49:20.719 --> 00:49:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't uh, I don't know why he would

893
00:49:23.920 --> 00:49:27.599
<v Speaker 3>be muted. He shouldn't be muted. I can hear him. Fine,

894
00:49:27.639 --> 00:49:33.559
<v Speaker 3>it looks like his his audio should be playing, Alex,

895
00:49:33.599 --> 00:49:37.159
<v Speaker 3>can you give me a one two three one two test?

896
00:49:40.800 --> 00:49:41.239
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm.

897
00:49:44.840 --> 00:49:55.639
<v Speaker 3>It's weird because I noticed that it started to Yeah,

898
00:49:55.639 --> 00:49:57.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why. I think it didn't. Actually it

899
00:49:57.800 --> 00:50:00.679
<v Speaker 3>didn't actually mute. What it did was h Actually it

900
00:50:00.719 --> 00:50:04.599
<v Speaker 3>was starting to crash because I noticed, like my mouse

901
00:50:04.639 --> 00:50:08.119
<v Speaker 3>froze and inn it. But I mean, this is like

902
00:50:08.199 --> 00:50:10.519
<v Speaker 3>straight up just stream laves issues like there's no.

903
00:50:12.840 --> 00:50:15.920
<v Speaker 4>So I noticed too, didn't I remember?

904
00:50:15.920 --> 00:50:19.559
<v Speaker 3>If I remember, didn't Hashmeyer try to go to Clement route,

905
00:50:19.599 --> 00:50:22.119
<v Speaker 3>And it's like, that's funny because you know, if you

906
00:50:22.199 --> 00:50:27.320
<v Speaker 3>read like the Sashinsky book, like Rumman, Cawcol like Apologetics

907
00:50:27.559 --> 00:50:31.159
<v Speaker 3>has dropped using Clement for many, many decades because it

908
00:50:31.199 --> 00:50:33.480
<v Speaker 3>doesn't actually show what they wanted to show.

909
00:50:34.239 --> 00:50:35.119
<v Speaker 4>Are you familiar with that?

910
00:51:15.679 --> 00:51:20.960
<v Speaker 5>The two assemblies. He also went through the road of datas.

911
00:51:21.039 --> 00:51:50.280
<v Speaker 3>And okay, hold on a second, because something has died

912
00:51:50.400 --> 00:51:52.000
<v Speaker 3>in terms of your sound.

913
00:51:53.239 --> 00:51:53.840
<v Speaker 4>For some reason.

914
00:51:53.880 --> 00:51:59.039
<v Speaker 3>There's no you're not coming in too. Yeah, try that,

915
00:52:00.039 --> 00:52:04.840
<v Speaker 3>m so hopefully we'll get this ironed out. Like, I

916
00:52:04.880 --> 00:52:07.519
<v Speaker 3>don't know why. This is just it's unreal. It's never

917
00:52:07.880 --> 00:52:10.440
<v Speaker 3>never worked like we had a perfect stream today. Maybe

918
00:52:10.440 --> 00:52:13.079
<v Speaker 3>I should have just used zoom like we did with

919
00:52:13.440 --> 00:52:17.599
<v Speaker 3>Kai and then we wouldn't have had these issues. Okay,

920
00:52:17.639 --> 00:52:19.400
<v Speaker 3>So can you guys hear Alex now?

921
00:52:19.559 --> 00:52:25.159
<v Speaker 4>Is he back talk for me? You know?

922
00:52:25.199 --> 00:52:28.079
<v Speaker 3>It's it's crazy because like on the mixer, I can

923
00:52:28.119 --> 00:52:31.159
<v Speaker 3>see that you're coming through and I'm coming through, but

924
00:52:31.239 --> 00:52:34.280
<v Speaker 3>then when I played you like, it's not there's no

925
00:52:34.400 --> 00:52:35.039
<v Speaker 3>audio for you.

926
00:52:35.119 --> 00:52:35.599
<v Speaker 4>It's weird.

927
00:52:44.719 --> 00:52:46.960
<v Speaker 3>No, so there's no there's no audio for you for

928
00:52:47.000 --> 00:52:58.679
<v Speaker 3>some reason. Yeah, something happened and it crashed. Uh so

929
00:52:58.840 --> 00:53:04.119
<v Speaker 3>let me try to start stream lives again. So let's

930
00:53:04.159 --> 00:53:08.039
<v Speaker 3>hit Live Go Live again. So let's hit Live Go

931
00:53:08.119 --> 00:53:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Live again? And is Sam.

932
00:53:13.199 --> 00:53:15.280
<v Speaker 4>Shamun is attacking us with warbs?

933
00:53:16.719 --> 00:53:18.960
<v Speaker 3>He's ready to finish me off. He's trying to do

934
00:53:19.039 --> 00:53:24.159
<v Speaker 3>his finish hit, you know, his his final move. Okay,

935
00:53:24.440 --> 00:53:26.000
<v Speaker 3>can we hear Alex now?

936
00:53:26.079 --> 00:53:29.400
<v Speaker 5>Testest test test test one two test test test.

937
00:53:31.280 --> 00:53:31.760
<v Speaker 4>Is he back?

938
00:53:31.840 --> 00:53:34.320
<v Speaker 3>We need to know it says, it says you're back.

939
00:53:34.440 --> 00:53:38.199
<v Speaker 3>I think, so pick back up where you were. I apologize.

940
00:53:38.199 --> 00:53:42.400
<v Speaker 3>We're talking about Clement, and yes, so you're right. What

941
00:53:42.519 --> 00:53:45.360
<v Speaker 3>happened was stream Lives is crashing. That's what it was.

942
00:53:45.559 --> 00:53:46.199
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, Alex.

943
00:53:47.079 --> 00:53:50.039
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So in Sashinsky's book, like you mentioned, he talks

944
00:53:50.079 --> 00:53:54.440
<v Speaker 5>about how Roman Catholic apologists and polemicists have kind of

945
00:53:54.480 --> 00:54:00.000
<v Speaker 5>abandoned this, uh, this argument that Clement is a strating

946
00:54:00.000 --> 00:54:01.960
<v Speaker 5>some sort of papal authority. They say that it's very

947
00:54:01.960 --> 00:54:04.559
<v Speaker 5>clear that this is one church writing to another church,

948
00:54:04.800 --> 00:54:07.000
<v Speaker 5>not from some sense of authority, but a sense of

949
00:54:07.039 --> 00:54:10.079
<v Speaker 5>like brotherly affection, like from one church to another sister church,

950
00:54:10.119 --> 00:54:11.880
<v Speaker 5>to where it's like, hey, you guys should probably get

951
00:54:11.880 --> 00:54:14.079
<v Speaker 5>your act in order, because like people are talking about,

952
00:54:14.119 --> 00:54:17.199
<v Speaker 5>you know, this squabble that you have within your leadership.

953
00:54:17.239 --> 00:54:19.920
<v Speaker 5>And he talks about how like the Apostles foresaw that

954
00:54:20.360 --> 00:54:22.079
<v Speaker 5>there would be disputes like this, and they chose these

955
00:54:22.119 --> 00:54:27.320
<v Speaker 5>people on purpose, so you shouldn't depose them without, you know,

956
00:54:27.480 --> 00:54:30.679
<v Speaker 5>some sort of good reason. So yeah, he took that

957
00:54:30.719 --> 00:54:34.000
<v Speaker 5>Clement approach and also Saint Optatus. It's just usually the

958
00:54:34.039 --> 00:54:36.119
<v Speaker 5>same story over and over again that you see with

959
00:54:36.159 --> 00:54:40.320
<v Speaker 5>these Roman Catholic apologists, which from a litigation perspective as

960
00:54:40.320 --> 00:54:44.320
<v Speaker 5>a lawyer, that's kind of expected because they have their story.

961
00:54:44.360 --> 00:54:47.079
<v Speaker 5>We have our story. Now let's subject each of them

962
00:54:47.079 --> 00:54:48.920
<v Speaker 5>to scrutiny and see which one wins out at the

963
00:54:49.000 --> 00:54:51.880
<v Speaker 5>end of the day. So what I like to look

964
00:54:51.880 --> 00:54:53.800
<v Speaker 5>at is like, Okay, you have Saint Optatus. You have

965
00:54:53.880 --> 00:54:56.800
<v Speaker 5>Saint Cyprian at about the same time, who basically says

966
00:54:57.440 --> 00:55:00.239
<v Speaker 5>every bishop has the fullness of Peter within himself. He

967
00:55:00.239 --> 00:55:02.880
<v Speaker 5>says there is no bishop that is a ruler of bishops,

968
00:55:03.119 --> 00:55:07.119
<v Speaker 5>especially in his disputes with Saint Stephen so and also

969
00:55:07.159 --> 00:55:10.000
<v Speaker 5>with Saint Optatus. I don't think you can discount the

970
00:55:10.000 --> 00:55:13.119
<v Speaker 5>special relationship that Carthage has with Rome, because if like literally,

971
00:55:13.159 --> 00:55:14.920
<v Speaker 5>you can pull up a map today and see that

972
00:55:14.960 --> 00:55:17.400
<v Speaker 5>Carthage is just a stone's throw away from Rome. So

973
00:55:17.440 --> 00:55:21.159
<v Speaker 5>although Carthage was its own independent diocese, of course they

974
00:55:21.159 --> 00:55:23.639
<v Speaker 5>had a special relationship with Rome. It had a special

975
00:55:23.760 --> 00:55:27.599
<v Speaker 5>prestige within the Early Church. And I think that lens

976
00:55:27.760 --> 00:55:31.920
<v Speaker 5>of viewing the different patriarchates in terms of prestige is

977
00:55:31.960 --> 00:55:34.480
<v Speaker 5>probably the best way to see it. I don't think

978
00:55:34.480 --> 00:55:37.840
<v Speaker 5>I've seen a better way to interpret those early documents.

979
00:55:38.920 --> 00:55:39.119
<v Speaker 4>Now.

980
00:55:39.159 --> 00:55:42.280
<v Speaker 3>You have some other good insights in the videos that

981
00:55:42.320 --> 00:55:44.599
<v Speaker 3>you deal with with relics things like that, And I

982
00:55:44.599 --> 00:55:48.039
<v Speaker 3>think that probably because you came out of a Pentecostal background,

983
00:55:48.039 --> 00:55:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Protestant background like myself. I wasn't raised Pentecostal, but I was,

984
00:55:52.400 --> 00:55:55.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, charismatic, right, I was charismatic for a little while,

985
00:55:55.440 --> 00:55:58.000
<v Speaker 3>but I was eventually Calvinist and very serious about that.

986
00:55:58.360 --> 00:55:59.920
<v Speaker 3>So I think we all deal with things like relig

987
00:56:00.159 --> 00:56:03.800
<v Speaker 3>intersession of saints and whatnot. And I really appreciated what

988
00:56:03.400 --> 00:56:06.760
<v Speaker 3>you came up with in terms of like Moses's staff.

989
00:56:06.800 --> 00:56:08.599
<v Speaker 3>I never even thought about that as like an Old

990
00:56:08.639 --> 00:56:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Testament relic. So what was the hang up with you

991
00:56:11.920 --> 00:56:14.159
<v Speaker 3>with relics? And then what was the kind of thing

992
00:56:14.199 --> 00:56:16.000
<v Speaker 3>that flipped you over to being like, oh, okay, this

993
00:56:16.039 --> 00:56:16.880
<v Speaker 3>makes perfect sense.

994
00:56:17.960 --> 00:56:20.960
<v Speaker 5>What was just reevaluating the Bible and taking a systematic

995
00:56:21.000 --> 00:56:23.519
<v Speaker 5>theology approach and just like kind of doing it on

996
00:56:23.559 --> 00:56:27.199
<v Speaker 5>my own while building up this orthodox fronema by reading

997
00:56:27.199 --> 00:56:29.800
<v Speaker 5>the Fathers, right, I think that's so important it cannot

998
00:56:29.800 --> 00:56:32.400
<v Speaker 5>be overstated. But it's in the same way that I

999
00:56:32.400 --> 00:56:34.000
<v Speaker 5>went through the New Testament, and I was like, Okay,

1000
00:56:34.000 --> 00:56:36.400
<v Speaker 5>what exactly do they say about the church? Oh wait,

1001
00:56:36.440 --> 00:56:39.679
<v Speaker 5>it's the pillar and grounds of the truth. The Church

1002
00:56:40.679 --> 00:56:43.480
<v Speaker 5>is indeffectible, the gates of Hades will not prevail against

1003
00:56:43.480 --> 00:56:46.280
<v Speaker 5>the Church. And then the Apostolic succession through the laying

1004
00:56:46.360 --> 00:56:50.320
<v Speaker 5>on of hands of Paul and Timothy. You see, a

1005
00:56:50.320 --> 00:56:53.360
<v Speaker 5>lot of these passages are just excluded completely from these

1006
00:56:53.360 --> 00:56:56.760
<v Speaker 5>Protestant circles because they don't help them. So I was like, okay, well,

1007
00:56:56.840 --> 00:56:58.360
<v Speaker 5>let's go through the New Testament. Let's see what it

1008
00:56:58.360 --> 00:56:59.719
<v Speaker 5>has to say about the Church. Let's go through the

1009
00:56:59.760 --> 00:57:01.599
<v Speaker 5>whole Bible and see what it has to say about

1010
00:57:01.599 --> 00:57:05.239
<v Speaker 5>like sacred objects in general. So right away, you see

1011
00:57:05.280 --> 00:57:09.519
<v Speaker 5>like Joseph's bones were processed through the desert for forty years.

1012
00:57:09.760 --> 00:57:11.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is another one that I didn't think about

1013
00:57:11.679 --> 00:57:13.679
<v Speaker 3>when I was Protestant. I remember hearing this when I

1014
00:57:13.719 --> 00:57:15.480
<v Speaker 3>first got into Catholicism. I was like, man, I never

1015
00:57:15.559 --> 00:57:19.000
<v Speaker 3>even thought about that that Joseph's bones being treated with

1016
00:57:19.079 --> 00:57:21.199
<v Speaker 3>us reverence could be also kind of a relic.

1017
00:57:22.440 --> 00:57:24.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So I was thinking, surely there is something in

1018
00:57:24.880 --> 00:57:27.639
<v Speaker 5>the Jewish tradition about this, like there's no way they

1019
00:57:27.679 --> 00:57:30.639
<v Speaker 5>carried Joseph's bones around the desert for forty years and

1020
00:57:30.679 --> 00:57:32.880
<v Speaker 5>nobody has anything to say about it. And when I

1021
00:57:32.920 --> 00:57:37.079
<v Speaker 5>looked through the Jewish Mishnah on passages about Joseph's bones,

1022
00:57:37.360 --> 00:57:42.079
<v Speaker 5>it sounded exactly like a procession in the Orthodox Church

1023
00:57:42.159 --> 00:57:44.960
<v Speaker 5>today that you see with relics, And I was like, man, really,

1024
00:57:45.039 --> 00:57:48.599
<v Speaker 5>the continuity of the Abrahamic religion is not through modern

1025
00:57:48.679 --> 00:57:51.920
<v Speaker 5>day Judaism, it is through Orthodox Christianity. You see them

1026
00:57:51.920 --> 00:57:55.239
<v Speaker 5>doing the exact same things that they did with Joseph's bones,

1027
00:57:55.440 --> 00:57:57.400
<v Speaker 5>and the way they describe it in the Mishnah as

1028
00:57:57.400 --> 00:58:00.920
<v Speaker 5>well as like the passers by couldn't even tell, like

1029
00:58:01.000 --> 00:58:03.440
<v Speaker 5>which arc was more special than the other one, Like,

1030
00:58:03.519 --> 00:58:06.960
<v Speaker 5>clearly this is some like ornate box, a very ornate

1031
00:58:07.000 --> 00:58:09.519
<v Speaker 5>coffin that they're bringing it says in the mission a

1032
00:58:09.599 --> 00:58:12.400
<v Speaker 5>side by side with the ark of the Covenant. So

1033
00:58:12.679 --> 00:58:15.519
<v Speaker 5>clearly this is something that was held in high regard.

1034
00:58:16.840 --> 00:58:18.480
<v Speaker 5>And I guess the retort to that would be like

1035
00:58:18.599 --> 00:58:21.920
<v Speaker 5>you don't see them kissing Alex or bowing down to it. Well,

1036
00:58:22.440 --> 00:58:25.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean they bow down to the arc into the temple.

1037
00:58:25.840 --> 00:58:27.159
<v Speaker 5>Those are also creating.

1038
00:58:26.960 --> 00:58:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Objects, right, Yeah, and you see bowing to even earthly authorities, right,

1039
00:58:32.679 --> 00:58:37.039
<v Speaker 3>you see Joseph prostrating before Pharaoh, you see Elijah and elijhah.

1040
00:58:37.079 --> 00:58:40.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean this prostration idea itself, I think is something

1041
00:58:40.280 --> 00:58:43.199
<v Speaker 3>that I came to when I was you know, Calvinists

1042
00:58:43.199 --> 00:58:46.000
<v Speaker 3>coming into Catholicism back in two thousand and two or three.

1043
00:58:46.039 --> 00:58:47.679
<v Speaker 4>It was like, well, wait a minute.

1044
00:58:47.760 --> 00:58:51.280
<v Speaker 3>It can't just be the external bodily you know, movement

1045
00:58:51.320 --> 00:58:54.039
<v Speaker 3>that is the essence of the idolatry first and foremost,

1046
00:58:54.039 --> 00:58:56.960
<v Speaker 3>because idolatry is an issue of the heart first, and

1047
00:58:57.039 --> 00:59:01.159
<v Speaker 3>then secondly it's expressed and shown by the extra actions

1048
00:59:01.159 --> 00:59:04.719
<v Speaker 3>of devotion. So clearly in the Bible there's differences between

1049
00:59:05.239 --> 00:59:10.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, showing deference to authority versus actually sort of

1050
00:59:10.320 --> 00:59:13.480
<v Speaker 3>from the heart worshiping. Even though the bodily movement itself

1051
00:59:13.559 --> 00:59:16.320
<v Speaker 3>might be the same, right, there's a difference there. And

1052
00:59:17.039 --> 00:59:20.039
<v Speaker 3>you know, like like FDA is saying, like there's a

1053
00:59:20.079 --> 00:59:23.159
<v Speaker 3>lot of times that for a Protestant you just kind

1054
00:59:23.159 --> 00:59:28.280
<v Speaker 3>of approach the text with a very flat level of interpretation, like, well,

1055
00:59:28.280 --> 00:59:31.199
<v Speaker 3>that verse, you know, has to mean this, right, So

1056
00:59:31.239 --> 00:59:33.840
<v Speaker 3>like there's only one way to understand the word, you know,

1057
00:59:34.360 --> 00:59:37.719
<v Speaker 3>idolatry or images, graven images or whatever. So it's like

1058
00:59:38.079 --> 00:59:41.800
<v Speaker 3>everything is flat, everything has one single reference and there's

1059
00:59:41.800 --> 00:59:44.199
<v Speaker 3>no levels of nuance. And I think it was actually

1060
00:59:44.239 --> 00:59:46.599
<v Speaker 3>a good thing for me to read Jerome, you know,

1061
00:59:46.639 --> 00:59:48.519
<v Speaker 3>back in the day, Saint Jerome talking about the difference

1062
00:59:48.519 --> 00:59:55.000
<v Speaker 3>between you know, showing honor and deference versus like worship. Right,

1063
00:59:55.000 --> 00:59:58.480
<v Speaker 3>because scriptures say honor your father and mother. So obviously

1064
00:59:58.559 --> 01:00:01.800
<v Speaker 3>I have a greater type of honor that I would

1065
01:00:01.800 --> 01:00:04.880
<v Speaker 3>give to God the Father versus my father and mother.

1066
01:00:04.960 --> 01:00:08.519
<v Speaker 3>But even within the Ten Commandments, you're instructed to show

1067
01:00:08.960 --> 01:00:13.480
<v Speaker 3>reverence and honor and devotion to even created beings and authorities.

1068
01:00:14.320 --> 01:00:14.519
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1069
01:00:14.559 --> 01:00:16.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, another passage that stuck out to me on this

1070
01:00:16.559 --> 01:00:20.800
<v Speaker 5>issue was Jacob's Blessings to his sons. The blessing to

1071
01:00:20.880 --> 01:00:23.519
<v Speaker 5>Judah says that all of your brothers will praise you

1072
01:00:23.719 --> 01:00:27.920
<v Speaker 5>and they will bow down to you, exactly, and also

1073
01:00:27.960 --> 01:00:31.480
<v Speaker 5>in Revelation, Yeah, in the same vein where Jesus says

1074
01:00:31.519 --> 01:00:33.440
<v Speaker 5>I will bring those who hate you, you know, down,

1075
01:00:33.559 --> 01:00:35.880
<v Speaker 5>they will bow down to you. Yeah.

1076
01:00:36.079 --> 01:00:38.800
<v Speaker 4>So this is God speaking here.

1077
01:00:38.880 --> 01:00:43.159
<v Speaker 5>This is not some orthodox theologian, right, this is everybody

1078
01:00:43.199 --> 01:00:46.079
<v Speaker 5>can agree on the scriptures, I hope, at least on

1079
01:00:46.159 --> 01:00:47.440
<v Speaker 5>the basic sixty six book.

1080
01:00:47.480 --> 01:00:50.639
<v Speaker 4>Cannon right, well, what would you say? What would you

1081
01:00:50.639 --> 01:00:51.599
<v Speaker 4>say to somebody said, well.

1082
01:00:51.480 --> 01:00:54.039
<v Speaker 3>But wait a minute, though, Alex, you know that's Old

1083
01:00:54.039 --> 01:00:56.679
<v Speaker 3>Testament stuff, like you know what about the New test

1084
01:00:56.679 --> 01:00:58.320
<v Speaker 3>And I remember one time I was reading this.

1085
01:00:58.320 --> 01:00:59.400
<v Speaker 4>This wasn't even an argument.

1086
01:00:59.400 --> 01:01:01.519
<v Speaker 3>I remember just eating one day Peter and I was

1087
01:01:01.519 --> 01:01:04.480
<v Speaker 3>a Protestant, and I remember reading Peter's Epistles and he

1088
01:01:04.519 --> 01:01:07.519
<v Speaker 3>says he's talking about the transfiguration and he mentions the

1089
01:01:07.559 --> 01:01:11.239
<v Speaker 3>Holy Mountain. And I'm like, wait a minute, You're not

1090
01:01:11.280 --> 01:01:14.280
<v Speaker 3>supposed to call places or things holy in the New Testament.

1091
01:01:14.559 --> 01:01:15.920
<v Speaker 4>That's an Old Testament thing.

1092
01:01:15.960 --> 01:01:17.599
<v Speaker 3>I remember that, Like I was really struggling with that

1093
01:01:17.639 --> 01:01:19.440
<v Speaker 3>one time when I was a Calvinist, I was reading

1094
01:01:19.639 --> 01:01:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Peter's Epistles and he calls it the Holy Mountain.

1095
01:01:22.840 --> 01:01:26.639
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, there's a huge objection, guess within like neo Protestantism

1096
01:01:26.760 --> 01:01:30.280
<v Speaker 5>to this idea that God can like sanctify matter, that

1097
01:01:30.320 --> 01:01:33.480
<v Speaker 5>God can use matter. But we see, like I think

1098
01:01:33.559 --> 01:01:35.719
<v Speaker 5>the Epistles to the Hebrews is like spot on in

1099
01:01:35.760 --> 01:01:37.679
<v Speaker 5>this because it's like, look, in the Old Testament, we

1100
01:01:37.760 --> 01:01:40.519
<v Speaker 5>have shadows in the New Testament. If we have a fulfillment,

1101
01:01:40.679 --> 01:01:43.400
<v Speaker 5>that's not an abolishment of it, it's ushering it in

1102
01:01:43.480 --> 01:01:46.960
<v Speaker 5>a way that's real now, like ritual washing in the

1103
01:01:46.960 --> 01:01:50.360
<v Speaker 5>Old Testament. Like, yes, that was for as a tutor,

1104
01:01:50.440 --> 01:01:52.760
<v Speaker 5>you know, as Paul says in Galatians, to teach people

1105
01:01:53.679 --> 01:01:56.320
<v Speaker 5>the ways of God. That like, hey, you are a human.

1106
01:01:56.440 --> 01:01:58.880
<v Speaker 5>God is God. You know you have to be holy,

1107
01:01:58.920 --> 01:02:01.800
<v Speaker 5>You have to sanctify yourself in baptism. In the New Testament,

1108
01:02:01.800 --> 01:02:04.440
<v Speaker 5>you get the real thing. When Christ is baptized and

1109
01:02:04.440 --> 01:02:07.840
<v Speaker 5>he sanctifies the water of baptism, you have a fulfillment

1110
01:02:07.960 --> 01:02:11.400
<v Speaker 5>of these things. A section in Religion of the Apostles

1111
01:02:11.440 --> 01:02:13.360
<v Speaker 5>really put this together for me. From Stephen to Young

1112
01:02:13.400 --> 01:02:15.880
<v Speaker 5>when he was talking about like the Orthodox Church, this

1113
01:02:15.960 --> 01:02:18.639
<v Speaker 5>line still sticks with me today. Says, the Orthodox Church

1114
01:02:18.880 --> 01:02:23.079
<v Speaker 5>holds to the Torah to a t. We hold to

1115
01:02:23.159 --> 01:02:25.840
<v Speaker 5>the Old Testament law to a t, but the fulfillment

1116
01:02:25.920 --> 01:02:28.840
<v Speaker 5>of it where yes, we keep the Sabbath, it's fulfillment

1117
01:02:28.960 --> 01:02:33.000
<v Speaker 5>in Sunday in the Lord's Day. Yes, we maintain the

1118
01:02:33.119 --> 01:02:35.519
<v Speaker 5>law of the Torah. In Acts fifteen, it talks about

1119
01:02:35.519 --> 01:02:39.320
<v Speaker 5>how like these laws that they to not consume blood,

1120
01:02:39.519 --> 01:02:44.000
<v Speaker 5>to abstain from sexual immorality, to not worship idols, whatever.

1121
01:02:44.239 --> 01:02:46.039
<v Speaker 5>Those were all the laws in the Torah that appeal,

1122
01:02:46.159 --> 01:02:49.679
<v Speaker 5>that applied to the gentiles. So we keep all the

1123
01:02:49.719 --> 01:02:51.599
<v Speaker 5>laws to a t. We are the fulfillment, We are

1124
01:02:51.599 --> 01:02:54.320
<v Speaker 5>the continuation of this Old Testament. So it's just a

1125
01:02:54.360 --> 01:02:58.280
<v Speaker 5>more beautiful form of continuity, are more coherent form of

1126
01:02:58.320 --> 01:03:02.559
<v Speaker 5>continuity instead of this Protestant approach. That's like they recently.

1127
01:03:02.639 --> 01:03:05.079
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if you saw this Jay Joshua Haymes.

1128
01:03:05.199 --> 01:03:07.599
<v Speaker 5>I think it is probably the like some reformed influencer

1129
01:03:07.639 --> 01:03:10.480
<v Speaker 5>on Twitter who said one of the most abominable things

1130
01:03:10.519 --> 01:03:13.440
<v Speaker 5>I've heard, which is a misunderstanding of the law in

1131
01:03:13.440 --> 01:03:17.519
<v Speaker 5>the Old Testament. He said, slavery is an institution, is

1132
01:03:17.639 --> 01:03:21.760
<v Speaker 5>not inherently evil. Meanwhile, I see Gregory of Nissa talking

1133
01:03:21.800 --> 01:03:25.159
<v Speaker 5>about how slavery is a form of blasphemy against God

1134
01:03:25.280 --> 01:03:27.519
<v Speaker 5>because every human is made in the image of God

1135
01:03:27.559 --> 01:03:30.400
<v Speaker 5>and to have property rights over another human, Well, this

1136
01:03:30.519 --> 01:03:31.360
<v Speaker 5>is actually a God.

1137
01:03:31.400 --> 01:03:35.639
<v Speaker 3>This is actually a really difficult, nuanced topic that, believe

1138
01:03:35.679 --> 01:03:40.639
<v Speaker 3>it or not. Lewis, our buddy over Orthodoxia Hata has

1139
01:03:40.679 --> 01:03:44.280
<v Speaker 3>been working on a documentary on this because there's actually

1140
01:03:44.400 --> 01:03:48.039
<v Speaker 3>quite a there's somewhat of divergence between different church fathers

1141
01:03:48.039 --> 01:03:50.360
<v Speaker 3>on this issue, and Nissa has a position that is

1142
01:03:50.519 --> 01:03:53.639
<v Speaker 3>the most anti slavery. However, there are many other church

1143
01:03:53.639 --> 01:03:57.760
<v Speaker 3>fathers that will say otherwise. And I'm only saying that

1144
01:03:57.840 --> 01:03:59.840
<v Speaker 3>not to contradict you, Alex, but just to point out

1145
01:03:59.840 --> 01:04:04.039
<v Speaker 3>that it's the reason that Lewis has been working on

1146
01:04:04.079 --> 01:04:07.119
<v Speaker 3>this is that it's also a huge issue with Muslims.

1147
01:04:07.199 --> 01:04:09.599
<v Speaker 3>Muslims are making and have made a pretty big deal

1148
01:04:09.639 --> 01:04:14.760
<v Speaker 3>about this. And if you go over to Orthodox Shahata,

1149
01:04:15.119 --> 01:04:16.719
<v Speaker 3>if you want to get deep into the weeds on this,

1150
01:04:16.800 --> 01:04:20.039
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying eight months ago Lewis uploaded the first part,

1151
01:04:20.719 --> 01:04:23.760
<v Speaker 3>which is slavery and Christian and Muslim thought.

1152
01:04:24.159 --> 01:04:25.840
<v Speaker 4>I highly recommend.

1153
01:04:25.320 --> 01:04:30.159
<v Speaker 3>People check out Lewis's documentary or here or at Orthodox Shahata.

1154
01:04:31.440 --> 01:04:34.599
<v Speaker 3>But now I don't want to take away from your flow.

1155
01:04:35.440 --> 01:04:38.440
<v Speaker 3>We do have quite a few super chats before we

1156
01:04:38.639 --> 01:04:41.840
<v Speaker 3>move on to superchats, and everybody should follow Alex his

1157
01:04:41.920 --> 01:04:43.119
<v Speaker 3>channels link in the show description.

1158
01:04:43.400 --> 01:04:44.960
<v Speaker 4>Could you tell us about.

1159
01:04:46.079 --> 01:04:51.880
<v Speaker 3>What you think the debate is going to be coming

1160
01:04:51.960 --> 01:04:57.159
<v Speaker 3>up and what can you tell us about this debate

1161
01:04:57.239 --> 01:05:00.079
<v Speaker 3>and what you plan to without giving us your of

1162
01:05:00.159 --> 01:05:03.280
<v Speaker 3>showing your hand here, what what's your what's your strategy

1163
01:05:03.280 --> 01:05:04.320
<v Speaker 3>coming up for this debate?

1164
01:05:05.679 --> 01:05:07.760
<v Speaker 5>So I have two debates coming up. My first debate

1165
01:05:07.800 --> 01:05:09.559
<v Speaker 5>is on Distrember I thought was one.

1166
01:05:10.960 --> 01:05:11.400
<v Speaker 4>I have two.

1167
01:05:11.400 --> 01:05:14.320
<v Speaker 5>On December nineteenth, I'll be debating Elijah Yassi on is

1168
01:05:14.360 --> 01:05:19.119
<v Speaker 5>the Vatican one papacy is true? And as my approach

1169
01:05:19.119 --> 01:05:21.239
<v Speaker 5>to that will be, you know, I'm not gonna study

1170
01:05:21.280 --> 01:05:22.760
<v Speaker 5>at all. I'm just going to show up that day

1171
01:05:22.760 --> 01:05:24.039
<v Speaker 5>and I'm going to be You're.

1172
01:05:23.880 --> 01:05:27.519
<v Speaker 4>Going to tongs. You should just do the debate, and Tongs.

1173
01:05:29.159 --> 01:05:37.880
<v Speaker 5>Should about a yamaha, what's that? John MacArthur quotas Yeah.

1174
01:05:37.920 --> 01:05:40.519
<v Speaker 5>And then in April twenty twenty six, this is not

1175
01:05:40.599 --> 01:05:43.199
<v Speaker 5>official yet, but I have been going back and forth

1176
01:05:43.199 --> 01:05:45.400
<v Speaker 5>with Joe Heshmeier to have a debate with Joe Heshmeyer.

1177
01:05:46.280 --> 01:05:47.840
<v Speaker 5>We've been going back and forth a bit on whether

1178
01:05:47.880 --> 01:05:49.639
<v Speaker 5>we're just going to do the papacy or if it'll

1179
01:05:49.679 --> 01:05:54.559
<v Speaker 5>be like uh a survey of different distinctives between Orthodoxy

1180
01:05:55.159 --> 01:05:59.880
<v Speaker 5>and UH Roman Catholicism. So I would like to think,

1181
01:06:00.320 --> 01:06:04.000
<v Speaker 5>you know, the Ortho bros. On the interwebs, a few

1182
01:06:04.039 --> 01:06:07.239
<v Speaker 5>of them have reached out to me to helped me

1183
01:06:07.239 --> 01:06:09.679
<v Speaker 5>prep for some of this stuff. So a lot of

1184
01:06:09.679 --> 01:06:12.079
<v Speaker 5>people say that, you know, the orthobro community is like

1185
01:06:12.360 --> 01:06:16.679
<v Speaker 5>pretty mean and disinterested. That has not been my experience

1186
01:06:16.719 --> 01:06:17.039
<v Speaker 5>at all.

1187
01:06:17.159 --> 01:06:19.960
<v Speaker 3>No, it's just a way for people to fuss about

1188
01:06:20.119 --> 01:06:23.440
<v Speaker 3>stuff and have an excuse to oh, he's mean, won't

1189
01:06:23.440 --> 01:06:24.119
<v Speaker 3>have to deal with him.

1190
01:06:24.599 --> 01:06:26.719
<v Speaker 4>But in reality, I mean, this is.

1191
01:06:26.880 --> 01:06:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Some of the best dudes out there, right, Yeah, absolutely,

1192
01:06:30.360 --> 01:06:31.719
<v Speaker 3>that has been my experience for sure.

1193
01:06:35.239 --> 01:06:37.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so let's see we got some superjest notorious seventy

1194
01:06:37.880 --> 01:06:40.400
<v Speaker 4>seventy six five dollars Jay, what is your thought about

1195
01:06:40.400 --> 01:06:42.880
<v Speaker 4>going to college at this point? What about for somebody

1196
01:06:42.880 --> 01:06:45.800
<v Speaker 4>wh wants to study philosophy and higher education? Is that

1197
01:06:45.840 --> 01:06:50.480
<v Speaker 4>a lost cause? Unfortunately, especially if you're a heterosexual.

1198
01:06:49.800 --> 01:06:52.920
<v Speaker 3>White dude, you're not going to be very welcomed at

1199
01:06:53.000 --> 01:06:57.800
<v Speaker 3>the average university state university system school.

1200
01:06:57.840 --> 01:06:59.079
<v Speaker 4>I would not recommend that.

1201
01:06:59.800 --> 01:07:02.679
<v Speaker 3>If if you have a unique situation where maybe you

1202
01:07:02.719 --> 01:07:04.280
<v Speaker 3>have a family that's going to pay for you to

1203
01:07:04.280 --> 01:07:07.639
<v Speaker 3>go to a private school, some you know, decent Catholic

1204
01:07:07.719 --> 01:07:09.559
<v Speaker 3>school and you want to get that type of an education.

1205
01:07:09.679 --> 01:07:12.960
<v Speaker 3>In those cases, that might work. But if you're a

1206
01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:15.960
<v Speaker 3>working class dude. I would not tell you to go

1207
01:07:16.079 --> 01:07:19.840
<v Speaker 3>into massive amounts of debt to get a piece of paper.

1208
01:07:19.880 --> 01:07:23.239
<v Speaker 3>It's not worth it. But again that's you know, I can't.

1209
01:07:23.400 --> 01:07:26.559
<v Speaker 3>It really depends on your scenario. Flavias ten dollars, thank

1210
01:07:26.599 --> 01:07:28.320
<v Speaker 3>you so much. Appreciate that he doesn't say anything.

1211
01:07:28.400 --> 01:07:32.480
<v Speaker 4>Jordaane says, guys, if everybody, if there's audio, refresh the stream.

1212
01:07:32.519 --> 01:07:34.239
<v Speaker 4>It'll get better days.

1213
01:07:34.320 --> 01:07:36.840
<v Speaker 3>The King says, for five dollars, can you guys talk

1214
01:07:36.880 --> 01:07:39.840
<v Speaker 3>about the early church hierarchy structure in terms of bishop,

1215
01:07:39.840 --> 01:07:43.800
<v Speaker 3>priests and deacons. My evangelical friends all argue that they're

1216
01:07:44.000 --> 01:07:46.480
<v Speaker 3>the same. There is a great talk that's kind of

1217
01:07:46.480 --> 01:07:49.119
<v Speaker 3>a classic that I will put into the chat for

1218
01:07:49.159 --> 01:07:53.400
<v Speaker 3>you guys, and it's Perry Robinson's talk on Apostolic succession.

1219
01:07:53.719 --> 01:07:55.119
<v Speaker 3>So I'm gonna put that in the chat for you

1220
01:07:55.239 --> 01:07:57.360
<v Speaker 3>right here.

1221
01:07:58.519 --> 01:08:02.559
<v Speaker 5>I'd also recommend Father Agree rodgers yessay here on Apostolic succession.

1222
01:08:02.599 --> 01:08:04.679
<v Speaker 4>There's a great essay on that as well. I was

1223
01:08:04.679 --> 01:08:06.880
<v Speaker 4>going to bring that up too, so appreciate it. Yeah,

1224
01:08:07.000 --> 01:08:07.360
<v Speaker 4>go ahead.

1225
01:08:07.440 --> 01:08:11.239
<v Speaker 5>The Pamazansky dogmatic theology, I know that's a popular one

1226
01:08:11.239 --> 01:08:13.039
<v Speaker 5>these days. He has a very good section I think

1227
01:08:13.079 --> 01:08:16.680
<v Speaker 5>on apostolic succession in the three tiered office, I think

1228
01:08:18.359 --> 01:08:21.119
<v Speaker 5>Perry's point, I think if I remember it correctly to summarize,

1229
01:08:21.159 --> 01:08:23.279
<v Speaker 5>is that like, regardless of the terms, you do see

1230
01:08:23.319 --> 01:08:26.680
<v Speaker 5>like a distinction between three offices. Like, for example, you

1231
01:08:26.760 --> 01:08:29.960
<v Speaker 5>see that Saint Paul has authority over Saint Timothy and

1232
01:08:30.039 --> 01:08:32.600
<v Speaker 5>Saint Titus, and Saint Timothy and Saint Titus have the

1233
01:08:32.640 --> 01:08:36.159
<v Speaker 5>authority to review complaints against other elders in the church,

1234
01:08:36.399 --> 01:08:39.119
<v Speaker 5>So that puts Saint Timothy and Saint Titus above those

1235
01:08:39.159 --> 01:08:44.359
<v Speaker 5>other clergy members. So you see a three tiered structure regardless.

1236
01:08:44.880 --> 01:08:47.680
<v Speaker 4>John, and on five dollars, Jay, thank you for your influence.

1237
01:08:47.720 --> 01:08:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Good to see you having discussions with Alex Wren on

1238
01:08:49.800 --> 01:08:51.880
<v Speaker 4>his journey to Orthodoxy. I'm enjoying.

1239
01:08:53.159 --> 01:08:56.239
<v Speaker 3>Also looking forward to your upcoming Athens and Jerusalem conference.

1240
01:08:56.319 --> 01:08:57.640
<v Speaker 4>Keep up the good work. Yeah, thank you.

1241
01:08:58.079 --> 01:09:02.479
<v Speaker 3>I think next year, since this one sold out so fruitfully,

1242
01:09:02.960 --> 01:09:05.520
<v Speaker 3>we will probably try to have another venue with an

1243
01:09:05.560 --> 01:09:08.199
<v Speaker 3>even larger crowd, Lord Willings, so maybe next year we

1244
01:09:08.239 --> 01:09:11.479
<v Speaker 3>get up into three four five hundred people versus two

1245
01:09:11.600 --> 01:09:15.159
<v Speaker 3>hundred this year. But fun ten dollars, Jay, I'm not

1246
01:09:15.199 --> 01:09:17.199
<v Speaker 3>sure if you read this last time my brother and

1247
01:09:17.239 --> 01:09:19.880
<v Speaker 3>I saw a homeless guy. He said he was speaking

1248
01:09:19.880 --> 01:09:22.840
<v Speaker 3>in tongues and it was a woman's voice, but he

1249
01:09:22.960 --> 01:09:24.000
<v Speaker 3>was barking.

1250
01:09:23.640 --> 01:09:25.640
<v Speaker 4>Like a dog. But he laughed hysterically.

1251
01:09:26.159 --> 01:09:30.399
<v Speaker 3>It's demonic and people think that that's the Holy Spirit. Well,

1252
01:09:30.439 --> 01:09:33.760
<v Speaker 3>like Alex said earlier about like comparing where we sent

1253
01:09:33.920 --> 01:09:36.319
<v Speaker 3>some kind of like tribal scenario or something.

1254
01:09:37.560 --> 01:09:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Like compair of the Kundalini.

1255
01:09:39.000 --> 01:09:41.319
<v Speaker 3>Oh Show where if you've seen an O show like

1256
01:09:41.359 --> 01:09:43.560
<v Speaker 3>the you know, Wild Wall Country and the documentaries of

1257
01:09:43.560 --> 01:09:46.600
<v Speaker 3>people doing you know, the show, oh show stuff, and

1258
01:09:47.039 --> 01:09:49.760
<v Speaker 3>just like you might see, you know, it's schizophrenic homeless guy,

1259
01:09:49.880 --> 01:09:53.079
<v Speaker 3>you know, out there gibbering at a mailbox, screaming and

1260
01:09:53.119 --> 01:09:54.119
<v Speaker 3>cussing out a mailbox.

1261
01:09:54.159 --> 01:09:57.560
<v Speaker 4>It's like, not a whole lot of difference, would you agree? Yeah?

1262
01:09:57.600 --> 01:09:59.720
<v Speaker 5>I think Also for me, they were like two key

1263
01:09:59.760 --> 01:10:02.680
<v Speaker 5>tech on this. It was like obviously Father Sarah fim

1264
01:10:02.760 --> 01:10:05.119
<v Speaker 5>Rose his orthodoxy in the religion of the Future was

1265
01:10:05.439 --> 01:10:08.359
<v Speaker 5>he really made that connection for me explicit. But another

1266
01:10:08.399 --> 01:10:10.199
<v Speaker 5>one that I think probably doesn't get enough attention on

1267
01:10:10.199 --> 01:10:12.760
<v Speaker 5>this topic is like I think it's the introduction, either

1268
01:10:12.800 --> 01:10:17.920
<v Speaker 5>the introduction or chapter one to Losky's Mystical Theology of

1269
01:10:17.960 --> 01:10:21.000
<v Speaker 5>the Eastern Church, because he talks about like the title

1270
01:10:21.039 --> 01:10:23.159
<v Speaker 5>of the book, and he's like, Okay, mystical theology, what

1271
01:10:23.199 --> 01:10:26.279
<v Speaker 5>does that mean. Well, mysticism is experienced. Theology is like

1272
01:10:26.319 --> 01:10:29.600
<v Speaker 5>the intellectual side. Orthodoxy has both. And I think that

1273
01:10:29.760 --> 01:10:32.560
<v Speaker 5>was like probably a unique advantage of my upbringing, where

1274
01:10:32.600 --> 01:10:35.840
<v Speaker 5>it was like, Okay, Pentecostalism was all this experience without

1275
01:10:35.880 --> 01:10:39.479
<v Speaker 5>any of the guardrails. Calvinism is just this like intellectual

1276
01:10:40.720 --> 01:10:44.359
<v Speaker 5>experience without that much mystical experience, if I could word

1277
01:10:44.399 --> 01:10:47.079
<v Speaker 5>it that way, And the way Loski describes it at

1278
01:10:47.079 --> 01:10:49.439
<v Speaker 5>the beginning of his book just like connects those two

1279
01:10:49.520 --> 01:10:51.800
<v Speaker 5>ideas so beautifully. I was like, this is what I've

1280
01:10:51.840 --> 01:10:54.800
<v Speaker 5>been looking for the whole time. He describes it perfectly.

1281
01:10:54.840 --> 01:10:59.920
<v Speaker 5>There another excellent point that I think you made in Hey, Jammy,

1282
01:11:00.800 --> 01:11:05.199
<v Speaker 5>somebody's out the door, which is weird. We don't usually

1283
01:11:05.199 --> 01:11:05.840
<v Speaker 5>get people in them.

1284
01:11:06.239 --> 01:11:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh oh, it's a plumber. You made a great point

1285
01:11:15.640 --> 01:11:18.159
<v Speaker 3>too about holistic argumentation. I think when you were talking

1286
01:11:18.199 --> 01:11:20.960
<v Speaker 3>to Cleeve, I thought that was a really good point

1287
01:11:21.000 --> 01:11:23.880
<v Speaker 3>that I'm glad you saw that and you were talking

1288
01:11:23.880 --> 01:11:27.960
<v Speaker 3>about reading, you know, Father deconductor and Anisis paper on yes,

1289
01:11:28.000 --> 01:11:30.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, revelational epistemology and that kind of stuff, and

1290
01:11:30.760 --> 01:11:35.119
<v Speaker 3>how both Protestants and you know with Redeem Zoomer and

1291
01:11:35.119 --> 01:11:36.960
<v Speaker 3>that debate that we had, and a lot of the

1292
01:11:37.000 --> 01:11:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Roman Catholics like they don't really think about these things

1293
01:11:39.920 --> 01:11:43.920
<v Speaker 3>as systems. And I appreciate that you understood the importance

1294
01:11:43.920 --> 01:11:45.640
<v Speaker 3>of that. Could you maybe speak to that a little bit,

1295
01:11:45.720 --> 01:11:49.640
<v Speaker 3>like why do you think systemic level argumentation is important

1296
01:11:49.680 --> 01:11:51.279
<v Speaker 3>in these debates and discussions.

1297
01:11:52.199 --> 01:11:54.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, it avoids a bigger problem, which I think is

1298
01:11:54.600 --> 01:11:57.640
<v Speaker 5>theological relativism. I think that's something that you see within

1299
01:11:57.680 --> 01:12:00.239
<v Speaker 5>the Protestant movement with and you see akind of in

1300
01:12:00.319 --> 01:12:03.600
<v Speaker 5>Roman Catholicism as well with any system that.

1301
01:12:03.760 --> 01:12:05.359
<v Speaker 4>I have to step away for just a second, so

1302
01:12:05.439 --> 01:12:06.239
<v Speaker 4>continue to talk.

1303
01:12:07.600 --> 01:12:11.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, no problem, but yeah, guys, so theological relativism, it's

1304
01:12:11.680 --> 01:12:14.960
<v Speaker 5>like a big problem that you see within any of

1305
01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:20.439
<v Speaker 5>these other worldviews. Orthodoxy, Holy Orthodoxy was so influential on

1306
01:12:20.560 --> 01:12:24.000
<v Speaker 5>me because as a system, it avoids this problem of

1307
01:12:24.039 --> 01:12:26.399
<v Speaker 5>relativizing the scriptures to mean what you want them to

1308
01:12:26.439 --> 01:12:30.159
<v Speaker 5>mean in a certain context, and it works together as

1309
01:12:30.199 --> 01:12:34.479
<v Speaker 5>a coherent truth, and you need some sort of objectivity,

1310
01:12:34.560 --> 01:12:37.920
<v Speaker 5>because if we just have you know, these subjective truths,

1311
01:12:38.319 --> 01:12:40.079
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I don't think you really have much of

1312
01:12:41.159 --> 01:12:41.920
<v Speaker 5>a religion there.

1313
01:12:42.159 --> 01:12:43.319
<v Speaker 4>I had to go talk to the plumber.

1314
01:12:43.399 --> 01:12:46.119
<v Speaker 5>Sorry, so said that you have to fight the plumber.

1315
01:12:46.239 --> 01:12:49.960
<v Speaker 5>But I basically just made a point on theological relativism

1316
01:12:50.439 --> 01:12:53.079
<v Speaker 5>and how if if you don't have that systemic approach,

1317
01:12:53.159 --> 01:12:56.680
<v Speaker 5>then you're just left like kind of creating doctrines piecemeal, right,

1318
01:12:57.079 --> 01:12:58.880
<v Speaker 5>And you need it to work as a whole system,

1319
01:12:58.920 --> 01:13:00.920
<v Speaker 5>because you know, you can't change one thing in your

1320
01:13:01.000 --> 01:13:04.840
<v Speaker 5>Christology and have that not affect your soteriology. So that

1321
01:13:04.920 --> 01:13:08.640
<v Speaker 5>systemic level thinking fights against theological relativism and you have

1322
01:13:08.720 --> 01:13:12.680
<v Speaker 5>a form of objectivism, objective theological truths. I think that's

1323
01:13:12.680 --> 01:13:15.279
<v Speaker 5>why young men are attracted to Orthodoxy these days too,

1324
01:13:15.279 --> 01:13:18.000
<v Speaker 5>because we are like, we grew up in a relativistic culture,

1325
01:13:18.039 --> 01:13:20.880
<v Speaker 5>a relativist society where your truth is your truth, my

1326
01:13:21.000 --> 01:13:25.279
<v Speaker 5>truth is my truth, and it leaks into theology as well, like,

1327
01:13:25.319 --> 01:13:27.720
<v Speaker 5>oh that's where you feel God over there, Well I

1328
01:13:27.720 --> 01:13:30.239
<v Speaker 5>guess you should go there as well. Oh you feel

1329
01:13:30.359 --> 01:13:32.439
<v Speaker 5>like you're called into this ministry? Well then you ask

1330
01:13:32.479 --> 01:13:35.960
<v Speaker 5>go ahead, Well, no, there are objective theological truths. You

1331
01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:38.439
<v Speaker 5>can't just believe and take whatever interpretation you want.

1332
01:13:40.159 --> 01:13:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, dirt, poor Robbinson's for ten dollars, Alex has three

1333
01:13:44.600 --> 01:13:46.880
<v Speaker 3>types of beards at the same time. Is this actually

1334
01:13:46.920 --> 01:13:54.159
<v Speaker 3>canonically orthodoxodox? I'm not orthodox enough yet. Well it's a

1335
01:13:54.199 --> 01:13:58.600
<v Speaker 3>great fair question. Uh Shaquina. Two dollars.

1336
01:13:59.079 --> 01:14:01.680
<v Speaker 4>Did you know that the Brandes or followers of Brandham?

1337
01:14:01.840 --> 01:14:03.920
<v Speaker 4>Is that a Pentecostal.

1338
01:14:05.399 --> 01:14:06.680
<v Speaker 5>Not familiar with the Brandon mice?

1339
01:14:06.760 --> 01:14:13.199
<v Speaker 4>Okay, notorious, No, we did that one. Excuse me, okay,

1340
01:14:13.239 --> 01:14:16.199
<v Speaker 4>we've done these contemporary companion ten dollars.

1341
01:14:16.279 --> 01:14:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Ah, yeah, diere by fire. This is the law bishop,

1342
01:14:20.119 --> 01:14:24.960
<v Speaker 3>so you are apparently the law bishop. I'll take it,

1343
01:14:25.000 --> 01:14:28.199
<v Speaker 3>I guess, and then I think we'll see we have

1344
01:14:28.319 --> 01:14:32.560
<v Speaker 3>one or two more over here. Notorious, No, we did that, Jordaine,

1345
01:14:35.159 --> 01:14:37.199
<v Speaker 3>and I think we have twenty one new members. Shout

1346
01:14:37.199 --> 01:14:40.840
<v Speaker 3>out to much Barrat, who also bought more members. He's

1347
01:14:40.880 --> 01:14:42.920
<v Speaker 3>a very generous member buyer.

1348
01:14:43.279 --> 01:14:45.399
<v Speaker 4>Guys, be sure and follow Alex over in his channel.

1349
01:14:45.399 --> 01:14:46.119
<v Speaker 4>He is linked.

1350
01:14:46.680 --> 01:14:49.640
<v Speaker 3>So anything you want to leave us with before we

1351
01:14:49.680 --> 01:14:51.680
<v Speaker 3>close it out tonight. Thank you for coming on. By

1352
01:14:51.680 --> 01:14:53.279
<v Speaker 3>the way, it was a great conversation. Also, guys, id

1353
01:14:53.319 --> 01:14:56.119
<v Speaker 3>on to Chalk dot com, HQ dot com and use

1354
01:14:56.159 --> 01:14:58.199
<v Speaker 3>a promo co Jife was already get forty percent off

1355
01:14:58.199 --> 01:14:59.920
<v Speaker 3>of all those great chalk products.

1356
01:15:00.039 --> 01:15:04.840
<v Speaker 5>Alex partying thoughts, say thank you for having me on Jay.

1357
01:15:04.880 --> 01:15:07.640
<v Speaker 5>It's a pleasure, you know. It's awesome to you know,

1358
01:15:07.960 --> 01:15:10.840
<v Speaker 5>be consuming your content for so long and then to

1359
01:15:10.960 --> 01:15:13.399
<v Speaker 5>be able to you know, build up a following, to

1360
01:15:13.439 --> 01:15:15.760
<v Speaker 5>come on and to have this conversation with you. You

1361
01:15:15.760 --> 01:15:19.359
<v Speaker 5>guys can find me on YouTube, Alex Soren Alex or

1362
01:15:19.439 --> 01:15:23.119
<v Speaker 5>tod C on Instagram and Twitter. That's in the Romanian spelling.

1363
01:15:23.119 --> 01:15:25.479
<v Speaker 5>It's O R T O d o x i E

1364
01:15:25.720 --> 01:15:26.479
<v Speaker 5>or A to dox C.

1365
01:15:27.720 --> 01:15:27.960
<v Speaker 4>See.

1366
01:15:27.960 --> 01:15:30.119
<v Speaker 5>I have a few videos in mind coming out, and

1367
01:15:30.239 --> 01:15:32.960
<v Speaker 5>I do have those few debates, so keep an eye out, guys.

1368
01:15:33.239 --> 01:15:34.560
<v Speaker 4>All right, Thank you guys, and a run over, a

1369
01:15:34.560 --> 01:15:34.920
<v Speaker 4>good night,
