Speaker 1: If you want to support the show and get the
episodes early and ad free, head on over to Freemanbeyond
the Wall dot com forward slash Support. I want to
explain something right now. If you support me through substack
or Patreon, you have access to an RSS feed that
you can plug into any podcatcher, including Apple, and you'll
be able to listen to the episodes through there. If
you support me through a subscribe, star gum Road or
on my website directly, I will send you a link
where you can download the file and you can listen
to it any way you wish. I really appreciate the
support everyone gives me. It keeps the show going. It
allows me to basically put out an episode every day now,
and I'm not going to stop. I'm just going to accelerate.
I think sometimes you see that I'm putting out two
even three a day, and yeah, can't do it without you,
So thank you for the support. Head on over to
Freeman Beyond the Wall dot com, forward slash support and
do it there. Thank you. I want to welcome everyone
back to the Pekingana Show. Dimes from Blood Satellites here.
How you doing times, I'm doing great. I'm very very
happy to be here. This remains one of my favorite
shows and it's not to be able to be here
to speak to you again. Yeah, it's been a while.
How are you doing, Jean, I'm well, thank you.
Speaker 2: Yeah, everyone, this is my friend Jean. For people who
don't know, he's not as notorious as some of us,
but he deserves to be. He helps me work on
a short video that I believe we'll probably be discussing today.
But he's the brains of the operation around here.
Speaker 1: Thanks. All right, Well, let's get into that, man, because
I know we only have an hour. So this day
after the inauguration here in the United States, obviously we
were talking a lot about I mean, the big thing
is immigration. That's the one thing people wanted to see.
Jan six prisoners pardoned. Got that. Now we need to
see the immigration stopped. And this video that you guys
did together is about immigration, but to your home country
in Canada. And you know, some of us may have
heard that Canada has become Pajeetville. Yeah, how did this happen? Guys?
Speaker 2: Well, and that's interesting because this video we had produced
a short documentary called Paving over the Public. It takes
you know, the Canadian perspective, but I maintained that it's
directly relatable and applicable to the America situation. It's different
in the sense that there's different groups involved. So in Canada,
the headlines are all about.
Speaker 1: Not totally, not totally, not totally.
Speaker 2: Well yeah, well, because also they're going back and forth
between our borders. So we have a big problem with
Indians Indian migration, and there's a few causes of that,
but you're noticing that they're flowing south through Canada into
America as well. Whereas in America, the main groups that
I'm hearing with trump'snauguration seems to be Central Americans and Mexicans,
and we've got like twelve Mexicans in Canada approximately.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I just I just meant the groups that are
respond for the immigration.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, okay, good party.
Speaker 1: Yes, yeah, well that's but we can come to we
can we can get to that. Let's let's stay let's
stay on on the groups that are actually going into Canada. Yes.
Speaker 2: So it's funny because if you think about the conversation
you're allowed to have in America, I found that, for example,
like you had just pointed out, I think mass migration
was the fulcrum issue of the last election. And I'm
a great fan of Marco Popics. He wrote this book
called Jeoe Plugoff, but he says every election hinges on
one central issue and people pretend it's a lot, but
it's really not. And the winners decided by who actually
addresses that issue. And in both instances, Donald Trump was
the only one, even in his first election, the only
one who even brought up mass migration. And you're actually
seeing the same thing in Canada, where mass migration is
pretty much what everybody's talking about, and the election will
go to whatever politician actually addressed is that and pretends
and doesn't pretend. Rather that's not existing, and so the
Conservatives will not be that group, so you know, everyone
wants Basically, you're seeing a level of I won't call
it hatred, but I'll say disgust towards this one group
of Indians in Canada. You're seeing liberals just in Conservatives,
you're seeing independence all kind of chanting the same thing,
like these people have got to fucking go. So and
I would have never predicted that could happen.
Speaker 1: I think my comment was growing up up up north,
and you know knowing Canadians and then living in South
Florida and living in a building full of Canadians, mostly
Quebec Cua, though mostly Quebec people, and was these are
nice people, and they genuinely are nice people. Even the
people from Quebec can be very nice. But wow, it
took pajeets in order to make them racist. That must
be a terrible There has to be something about this group.
Speaker 2: Of people, and it's people speaking of it in a
way that you or I might where at one time
it would be couched in just the economics of the situation,
but now you're seeing regular people like I find these
people annoying and they stink and I don't like them. Men, women, young, Oh,
it's things you would never believe. So that's interesting, just
like you're seeing in America. But the Canadian story is
a bit different because we're very similar to America in
the sense that multiculturalism is seen as the apex value
to have. But in Canada, especially with the Trudeau regime,
and I know Jean has some comments on this as well.
But the story, and that's what the documentary is about,
how this paradigm we exist in Canada, of that we
are a post nation state, and we are a multi
cultural state and we always have been. That's the narrative
you're brought up in school. You're raised on that. I
was raised on that. I live in Ontario, but it's
not like that everywhere. Quebec's have a different you know.
But still but how recently that paradigm was created. It
doesn't have its roots back hundreds of years. There is
no real melting pot mythology. Everything in Canada's happened pretty recently.
So if you are sixty seventy eighty years old, you
can remember a time before all this. But it's the
children who are like, well, we're the only thing you're
allowed to be in Canada in terms of identity is multiculturalist,
and we want to investigate why is that? How did
that happen? Because it wasn't always that case and the
recent mass migration has really shaken people out of that.
And I think it's gotten people asking questions that I've
never seen the mask before.
Speaker 1: It's like I said, living in South Florida, you do
have access to a lot of people from Canada, so
you get to hear stories from Canada. I mean, I
shared a building with people who like the building was
half the year was empty. And it wasn't all people
from Quebec. It was a lot of people from Ontario too,
And I would ask them about the politics. I mean,
this is twenty years ago, and the politics was always like, oh,
you know, free health care out of out of this
and you know, and it always came. It was always economics,
and it was always you know, we love our country,
come down here just to get away from the weather.
We're getting older, our bones can't take it anymore, so
you know, we spend it. But it was never about
the culture was always like the selling point. The culture
was always like, I mean, everything's clean, everything's perfect, everything,
you know, it's harmonious, we have no problems. And even
though even back then you did have a multicultural aspect,
but the multicultural aspect was I think at that point
it was mostly Europeans and then some Chinese were starting
to We're starting to really get in there.
Speaker 2: By multiculture is like, oh, we have a China town.
Isn't that fun to kind of wander through? And Sean
correct me if I'm wrong here. But when I my
co host Judas, he made a fun point that he
was brought up hearing the term the Great White North,
and I had said, well, that's because of all the
snow and it's cold. He said, oh, I thought it
was just because it was full of white people. He
actually thought that, And I'm like, but that was true.
It's like when people say, oh, Switzerland is so safe
and so clean and everything, but what the implicit comment
there is that when you imagine a Swiss person, what
do you imagine is just a clean European place. And
I think Canada enjoyed that for a long time, although
not outwardly stated.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean I'm in I'm in my early thirties,
and you know, even I can say that growing up
the city that I lived in, it was almost all
exclusively white. There were a couple of neighborhoods that had
historically been black, or been South Asian, so East Indian,
paget whatever we want to call it. But now you
see these types of people everywhere, and people have come
face to face with the realities of groups not mixing
to the tune of you know, how is getting shot
up due to extortion rackets. Many videos of Indian students
and temporary foreign workers speaking in Punjabi telling people that
when they immigrate they should be using food banks, you know.
So these kind of things just they're beyond distasteful and
people do have a reaction to it. I mean, the
middle class in Canada was very comfortable for a time. Obviously,
the single income family hasn't been a reality for a
long time, but middle class typically, you know, women, especially
in the last couple decades, could work from home, or
they could work part time, or they could have cushy
administrative office jobs. I can speak from experience and say
that two of my coworkers' wives who had these types
of jobs have been laid off in the last six
months because their jobs have been exported over to India.
And so at a time when you have record inflation,
especially when it comes to things like groceries, for people
to then have their comfortable lives completely displaced because their
wives are no longer having this second income is another
thing that are hitting people who are you know, ostensibly libtards,
but they're now again faced with the harsh realities of
these things.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it starts with the economic issue, and I've made
a point recently that most Canadians are not truly prepared
to have an economic conversation like you are in the US,
and even in the UK there's not a lot of
discussion on trade, but the fact that nobody can really
afford a house reasonably. You know, you got the sort
of platonic ideal of what we think and the economics
of it should be, which is, oh, a man should
be able to support a family on a single income
and the wife should be able to stay at home
and raise the kids.
Speaker 1: That's the ideal.
Speaker 2: We're so far from that that people can not even
afford a house with dual incomes, and so that's that's
a lived reality that people are dealing with, and that's
how the Indian question gets brought up because you don't
need mass migration. All the arguments that we're familiar with,
like there is no economic benefit to any of this
that has made its way to the mainstream, and so
that's one of the reasons we produced that little video,
which was to put a mainstream friendly face forward because
there's you know, in the Canadian context, there's not a
lot of content or media out there that just explains
this stuff. If you look out Google, if you look
on YouTube, there's no resources that just explain the story.
And we thought that was fascinating, so we went into
it and the whole purpose was to show, Okay, how
did we get here? Who was responsible? Because it's a
very narrow window of time. There's only a handful of people,
bureaucrats and politicians who clandestinely, with their own machinations, tried
to make Canada the way it is. And what's interesting,
and this is the theme of the documentary, is that
we have access to all the public opinion polls at
the time, because they will try and tell you that, oh,
this is what your ancestors voted for, this was what
they're on the side of. But if you look at
the opinion polls Canadians at the time, right up until
you present day, they were very clearplicit that not only
were they no in favor of mass migration, they didn't
even use those ters, but they just they didn't understand
the need for immigration period. And that's what I always
like to explain to people, and go back to the
forties and fifties and if someone asked you, are you
in favor of immigration? They have not been propagandized with
the narrative that it's an economic benefit, so to them
it would just be a preposterous question. Why do we
need it?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 2: That doesn't even make sense? Why so no, of course not,
there actually is no benefit, and then over time people
end up propaganda as well. We need it because who's
going to pay taxes? And how are we going to
have universal healthcare and all that stuff. But it's so
clear that the public didn't want this, and yet it
happened anyway. So the unfortunate story is one that populism
is not effective at the polls, which is something a
lot of people here would into it. But it's very
very clear that no one wanted it, and it happened anyway.
So you really necessarily vote your way out of this.
Speaker 3: I think it's interesting to oh, sorry, go ahead.
Speaker 1: Can I yeah? Can I ask you? Finished your comment?
But can you talk a little bit about when the started,
like when, like specifically when the push for mass what
we would call mass immigration what we would call today
weaponized immigration into Canada started.
Speaker 3: Sure, Just to respond to Dime's point very briefly, I
think it's interesting to say that the only time the
Canadian government actually took a widespread sample of Canadian opinion
in nineteen seventy three with regards to immigration. It was
shut down, It was halted very quickly, and most of
those public meetings were just taken over by communists who
disrupted everything. And the Canadian government made it very clear
that if they had any kind of anti immigration brief,
they were going to dismiss it as quote unquote irrational.
And this is something that we cover in the documentary.
In terms of the documentary as a whole, though, what
we cover is the years nineteen forty seven, so the
postwar years up to nineteen seventy six, which is when
we had a new immigration act under Trudeau Senior, that
is Pierre Trudeau. To speak to your answer about when
it started, I mean Canadian immigration generally is very limited.
I mean you see two periods of immigration that could
be described as significant, from let's say seventeen eighty three
to the early eighteen hundreds and then maybe like eighteen
thirty one to eighteen fifty. And then there's another push
for immigration prior to World War One, from let's say
like eighteen ninety six to probably nineteen eleven, and that
was to settle the Prairies. So all of this was
all this is to say that you know, there was
a need to settle the Prairies. But besides that, there
wasn't really any mass immigration or what we could speak
of as mass immigration. But after World War Two there
was an impetus to kind of fight you know, racism,
and so this is where you saw international pressure from
the United Nations onto Canada. And our Prime minister at
the time was Mackenzie King, and he was very clear
about being against mass immigration from even Europe, but especially
anything coming from China. And in nineteen forty seven he
gave a speech saying we're not going to permit any
mass immigration to Canada. If we do have refugees, it's
going to be a very limited thing. But just a
few days later his administration started what was at that
time the largest refugee initiative in Canadian history, which brought
it approximately one hundred and sixty five thousand people over
the next six years, which at that time was a
very remarkable number. So it started right after World War Two.
The international pressure ramped up in nineteen forty eight against
the subsequent administration, which was run by one Louis Saint Laurent,
and that was because of the United Nations Declaration of
Universal Human Rights or whatever. The acronym IS and so
this whole thing started because of external pressure from the
United Nations, but as Dimes talked about, the ideology behind
this kind of permeated into our elites in the fifties
and in the sixties. So, I mean, I can speak
more about that if you want, or we can stop there.
Speaker 1: I would just say that I just looked it up
and you mentioned what was it, one hundred and sixty
five thousand.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I believe that's the number that's hop stop my.
Speaker 1: Hand something like that. Canada's population in nineteen fifty was
thirteen point seven million, So you're basically talking about like
one percent, right, the equivalent of one percent of the population.
I mean, you're talking about a cultural shift that one
percent can make, and that one percent isn't going to stop.
We know that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And the exact same groups that we've been pushing
this in America were present in Canada. So you can
list a number of groups. There's the NGOs, there's communists
and leftists and progressives. Then there's you know, no shortage
of you know, Jewish groups involved as well. Like this
is all the post war was it? The postwar consensus?
That's the thing we're calling it now. This was the
postwar consensus manifest in Canada, and as you can imagine,
there's so many bureaucrats and politicians who were trying to
ingratiate Canada and just like many countries were, to the
new global order, with thought, well, this is the price
you have to pay, and this is something that and
I think this is only expanded over time that we
don't really have much else to bring to the table
aside from sheer enthusiasm and try to be the vanguards
of that sort of multicultural progressivism. And that's why so
many Canadians are brought up believing that, you know, we
define ourselves against Americans. Not all of us, but a
lot of Canadians do. Like Americans. They're backwards, they're blood Heites,
but we are more enlightened, you know, We're more tolerance.
Tolerance is a worthy hear a lot up here. So
with that comes the baggage if you don't even need
to like it, but you must tolerate it, and therein
lies your strength. But also because Canada is encouraged to
be a multicultural patchwork, sort of a polyglot boarding house,
you don't have as many efforts for integration as America,
there's no mythology of the melting pot. So what you
have is these ethnic enclaves that are very objectively set
up and almost encouraged, and so over time, you know,
if that's kept on a minimal scale, you know, people
don't care as long as the homogeneous population is dominant.
But as those begin to grow, as you're seeing with
the Sikhs or the Six as they're like to be called,
and the Indians and then even more Chinese. Like, that's
the other theater of this that a lot of people
don't even want to talk about because there's ideological reasons.
People feel like if you complain about China, then you're
playing to the neo con narrative. But in Canada specifically,
we have a real problem with Chinese migration in through
the West Coast and BC, and they're responsible.
Speaker 1: For even even in Toronto. I remember, like ten years
ago I was reading some report where someone was actually
someone who lives in Toronto was actually commenting it's like
why am I working? Like why am I working my
job in busting my ass? And my wife has to
work in order to support ourselves, and there are these
Chinese who are driving around in like one hundred thousand
dollars Mercedes. Yeah, so who are these people? This doesn't
that doesn't sound like someone who oh the old Jewish troupe. Oh,
we just came here and worked hard, and five years
later we bought the town of Hartford, Connecticut.
Speaker 2: Yeah. You've never seen a Chice person work hard. You
just never seen it. They're just there in shiny suits
already because a lot that Again, this is what people
don't want to acknowledge. We don't really get to this
in the documentary, but it is important. Sam Cooper is
a Canadian journalist who's really on the forefront of this
and showing how. And there's another book called Willful Blindness.
Those two he's got closet the pay and that is
one by and then Wilfel Blindness, and it shows how
the Chinese Communist Party works hand in glove with the Triads,
which are gangs, but they control the fentanyl production in
factories in China and their response with the lion's share
of fentanyl imports all throughout North America. And this was
the case in the nineties, that's even the case now.
And so you're seeing BC as a landing pad for
basically for these Chinese fucking gangs and these gambling whales.
Speaker 3: Just to be clear too, like the Chinese thing is
an ongoing problem. And we had the Chinese Exclusion Act
put in place, I believe in nineteen twenty two, and
it was repealed in the late forties again due to
the same international pressure that made us accept all these
refugees and change our regulations. So it is the same.
Speaker 2: Source absolutely, And this is a real political problem for
us up here. Like this isn't just oh, we don't
like Chinese culture. I think that be that as it may.
You're having you know, Chinese nationals who are running for
municipal government. You're having vast swathes of land bought up
by Chinese business interests, like they're controlling the political structure
in a lot of very key areas. And that's just
the beginning of the problems, and no one really knows
how to address it. And there's this, you know, I
don't have the documents in front of me, but there
are rumors that of the Five Eyes unification of our
intelligence agencies like the CIA, we have ceases up here,
ours is seen as the most inept, like we should
not have let this happen. Someone at the highest level
of our intelligence community either drop the ball or is
in the pocket of these forces. And again, people don't
like to touch this because they think ideologically or geopolitically,
you shouldn't fall for the demonization of China. But like,
it's different in Canada. There are foreign power players out there.
It's not just America. The Great Satan is the bad guy.
I'm like, China does have designs to take shit over,
make no mistake, And I think you people we ignore
that at our peril.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, because the it's been set up that it's
like you said, you're a neocon. If you start talking
about that, oh, you just want to you're just buying
into neo kon talking points. We have to go to war,
the pivots to China, the pivots to China. It's like,
there can be a real problem with China, and you
don't want to. And your concerns aren't the same as
some neocons or some you know, you know, Steve Bannon
whatever he's bought into.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and it's not because they're evil, it's not even
because they're communists. If you just look at this from
a neo realist perspective, sort of like John Meerscheimer's offensive
realism school thought, Like they are looking out for their
own interests the same way as America, the same way
as Russia. All these big players are looking for their
own interest They will take an edge where they can
get it. That's all it is. You don't even need
to necessarily hate them to believe that. Well, of course
they will take advantage where they can, and it would
behoove us. And this is the story of what Canada
is dealing with. That's why America is so concerned with
Canadian sovereignty and why Trump is pressuring Canada so much,
in my opinion, to keep up our end of the
defense of that pact, because Arctic sovereignty is a big deal.
Does Canada have the internal defense infrastructure to project power
within its own borders to achieve the dominance over the
Arctic region for North American interests. That's really what Trump
wants to know. That's what Norad is basically, And you know,
maybe we don't. Maybe our defense infrastructure is kind of
lacking right now, and that's a real problem for China,
for Russia. Again, you don't need to hate them, but
this is just geopolitic.
Speaker 1: Well, one of the things that I took away from
the short documentary is, I mean it's like every single
time it's the phrase, every single time. How did these
I mean, from what I understand, like right now, less
than one percent of the population of Canada is Jewish?
How did these people get elected? Where did they come from?
I mean, I could understand NGOs, but you had people
in there who were in on the inside, let you know,
and people want to say, oh, well, you know, why
are you noticing this? Why is it? It's like because
it's one percent of the population, It's like here it's
two point four percent of the population. But whenever you
see something happening where you're like, wait a minute, that
might not be good for us, there's a couple of
them right there like leading it or thought leading it
or financing it, and it's like, well, what the is
going on here?
Speaker 3: I mean, when it comes to that question, in Canada,
at least, most of that came through labor organizations and
civil rights organizations, which were almost exclusively fronts for communist agitation,
and Canada had a history of dealing with this, especially
in Quebec. There's a premiere a duplus C who passed
something called the Padlock Law and I think nineteen twenty seven,
and that base said that if you were operating any
kind of communist organization out of a building, then that
building was liable to get taken over by the government.
You would be locked out of your building if you
were using it for communist stuff. And so again, the
labor organizations, left wing political parties such as the CCF
and then Labor literally later the Labor Progressive Party. These
were all places where Jewish people would agitate from and
specifically what they were agitating for was political rights for communists.
But then after that kind of died down, they started
working on egalitarian rights. And you know, in the forties,
the Canadian Jewish Congress was a famous ally of the
intern Japanese people. So they also, as they do it elsewhere,
allied with other disaffected quote unquote marginalized groups to form
power blocks and then agitate against the government. And especially
in the wake of World War Two, when you know,
people were it was not in vogue anymore to be
anti Semitic, that was a good way for them to
start really taking over things. I mean, yeah, sorry, I
can stop it there, I've got it.
Speaker 2: No, I want to say, it's the exact same tactics
you would see in America and elsewhere. They're agitating with
the exact same groups, with the exact same post war
consensus narrative that you must be anti racist and anti fascists,
let us be in charge of this thing. And you don't.
You don't want to be like the Nazis, do you,
and so open the floodgates.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean when you look at the numbers. At
the end of World War Two, Canada's population was twelve million,
twelve milly million people, and they're already they're agitating. It's
when did was Canada under the crown already at that
time nineteen five?
Speaker 3: I mean we had confederation in eighteen sixty seven. I
mean technically the British Crown still had their fingers in
things until nineteen eighty two, when the Constitution Act was
amended so that Canada could change its own constitution. I mean,
we've always had a we still have a Governor General,
which is someone who's appointed by Britain, and they have
to give a cent to all of our legislation stuff.
I'm not sure you can you be more specific with
the question. I'm not sure exactly what.
Speaker 2: You mean, because it is we're still technically under the
crown in a lot of ways, but maybe not as
directly back then.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, I was just thinking because in nineteen
at the end of the war, when you look at
like mass immigration into what they call the wind Rush
generation into England, they brought they started bringing the boast
to started bringing the Jamaicans in. I mean, that was them,
That was that certain group who was responsible for that.
And I was just wondering because Canada, you know, is
obviously still has influence from Britain. I was wondering if
that was the same thing. It was just like, well,
if we're doing it here, we're going to do it
in all of our provinces, all of our territories and
our Yeah, as well, that's.
Speaker 3: A great question. Okay, So I can kind of answer
your question, but I can also really answer your question,
maybe just in a little bit of a different way
than you were thinking. So the Commonwealth idea is a
big part of the nineteen sixty two Order and Council
passed by the deefen Baker government under Minister Ellen Fairklaud
and her deputy George Davidson, which eliminated almost all racial
restrictions from Third world immigration. And that was directly influenced
by the Commonwealth because deefen Baker, who's a conservative, was
obsessed with the Commonwealth. And we have a couple of
clips in the documentary where he discusses the Commonwealth and saying,
you know, we have different religions, we have different races,
we have different creeds, but we're all the same people.
And that was the impetus to start bringing in Yes
to Jamaican's Indians, especially in the nineteen sixties. And deefen
Baker is obsessed not only with the Commonwealth but also
with anti racism. And then that was motivated by some
exclusions that he felt as a child because he was
German and he saw Ukrainians face similar difficulties in the
Prairie provinces in which he grew up because of the
interment of those folks in World War One. So again
you had this conservative Commonwealth guy who had a chip
on his shoulder because of some experiences he had as
a child, and he said, okay, we have to eliminate
race from the census. He didn't pass that but he
said that he would have liked to have done that.
We need to open up the floodgates, and I'm going
to use the Commonwealth and our British history as the
reason that we have to do this. So that was
in a way central to his ideology. I don't know
if that kind of answers your question.
Speaker 1: No, Yeah, it just it just seems like it's whenever
you look at any period since World War Two, any
area where mass immigration has affected the effect of the culture,
and it really started like a slide down in the
imogeneity or you know how coherence of culture can be,
it seems like there's always one one group of people,
or you know, if it is like an organization, the
representative of it is from one group of people. So,
I mean, it just it's I catch crap for this
all the time, but how can you just not help
but notice that, Yeah, this small.
Speaker 2: Group, you know, and they do it, like I said,
the same way every single time, because you don't need
a central committee around the globe to do this. All
you need to do and Jean described it very well there,
which is that first they you have this idea of immigration.
People don't like immigration, but they kind of have this
implicit belief that they don't want certain people because you're
dealing with Europeans here, especially Anglo stock, and they're not
outrageous about it, like it takes them a lot to
state that they just hate a specific type of people
they'd rather not have to deal with that. Let it
be implied. But they first attack that, you know, prejudice
by saying, well, why not this type of immigration? You
like immigration, don't you don't hate everyone who's not you?
And you're like, oh no, Like it's the culture of
critique that we talk about. You can needle these sorts
of things into reality so it doesn't need to be
a sweeping thing. It's like, well, you like this, then
you must like this, otherwise you're a hypocrite. You don't
want to be a hypocrite to you. And you say, okay,
I guess, but within reason, And that's a fascinating word
if you've ever and no one watching this has probably
done this, but we did this on our show a
while ago, going through the Canadian Constitution and going through
the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which is nothing
like the Bill of Rights or nothing like the Constitution,
which is very narrow and very explicitly clear, and that's better.
Once you have these very legalistic, labyrinthine constitutions, you can
weasle your way to anything. So you see the word
reasonable pop up a lot, like you have certain rights
within reason, and of course that what is within reason
that's left up the judges, that's left up the politicians.
That's very few hard. I don't think there's a single
right we have in Canada that's not open to some
kind of smudge interpretation at the time if they just
deem that you don't like it, so yeah, oh yeah,
we like the immigration within reason, and what what within
reason means changes over time to now just means everyone.
It's very easy to just wedge that wide open, and
like we had said, it happened in a very short
window of time unless you're very very explicit about no,
we don't want this group for this reason. But like
we'd said, there's this one group, you know, Jewish groups
and geo's that are involved at every level, also within
the Communist Party. But then there's just the liberal status
quo that does not have the tools to repel that
sort of inquiry. And that's really what's happened.
Speaker 1: Around the world.
Speaker 2: Liberalism does not have the toolbox to actually answer this question.
So it always says, okay, I guess why not. Can't
be a hypocrite and now you have infinity somalis.
Speaker 1: That sounds well right to me? Can I just say
that well right to me? Sorry, it's okaya woke right, Yeah,
that sounds well great, John.
Speaker 3: I was just gonna say, like with the Jewish connection,
you had said, rightly, Pete, that we have less than
one percent of a Jewish population in Canada. But the
thing is they might not have the out and out
power in terms of control of the media and the
banks and other things that they do in the States.
But you have to understand that any American power is
projected onto Canada until in terms of multinationals or groups
like Van Guarden, Black Rock Holding, you know, the largest
amount of mutual funds in our big five Canadian banks.
So it's not like necessarily Jews here, but it's a
lot of American Jews that hold sway in Canada. And
another thing that Jewish groups are good at doing is
influencing the right people. So I spoke about Deef and Baker.
One of Deef and Baker's big things was an adverse
react he had to the Gazanco affair, which was some
people say the outset of the Cold War, where it
was a big spiring was discovered because of the Soviet
defector Igor Gazanko. And of the seventeen people that were
ultimately rounded up, six of them were Jewish and two
of them were married to Jews. And one of the
people who was married to Jews, his name was Raymond
I think Boye. He was a quebec Qua guy and
he like attended synagogue. He gave up his uh well,
he renounced his Catholic heritage and stuff. And when those
Jewish people were prosecuted, Diefenbaker himself saw it as an
egregious amount of government overstepping into the personal rights of people.
So there's that, I think more significantly, also, we've done
some research into Pierre Trudeau, and Pierre Trudeau is seen
as like our nation's modern father. He single handedly instituted
the policy of multiculturalism.
Speaker 1: As isn't he.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right. I think that that's a fair analogy.
And you know, he grew up as a quebec Qua nationalist.
He attended anti Semitic rallies. He wrote a play called
Lidu in high school, which was making fun of quebec
Qua people who decided to buy from Jewish merchants as
opposed to Francophones. But he ended up going to Harvard
in forty six forty seven. He then Sorry and then
in Harvard he was taught by mostly Jewish professors. He
became quite enamored with the book Levia Theme I think
is what it's called, which is about, you know, the
Nazi regime and how bad it was. It was one
of the early books of that nature. And then he
went to Paris where he became part of a group
of psychoanalysis, so you know, the whole Freudian thing. And
then he finished his post secondary education under the tutelage
of one Jewish stalinist, Harold Laski at the London School
of Economics. So again this was a very prominent elite
gentleman who had his views totally flipped around at the
tail end of his youth because of various Jewish intellectuals,
and he continued to meet to name, Harold Laski is
one of his lasting influences even into the seventies and eighties.
So it's not something that left him, you know.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: And also another thing is if you look at the
story of multiculturalism, you'll read these sources where Jewish groups
pride themselves on being the vanguard of this thing. They
will credit themselves being like, we were the ones who
pushed multiculturalism. So, you know, you can be afraid of
being deemed anti Semitic for saying this, But I'm like,
I'm just quoting Jews. I'm just talking. I'm taking them
at their word. They seem to think they were instrumental
in this.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's one of the things is once you realize
that that's happening, you're only allowed to celebrate it and
not criticize it. Yeah.
Speaker 2: I always said that my favorite and we've gotten you know,
our YouTube channel bands like twice, I think three times
in the past for doing this. But I always would
jokingly say that most of the books on this question
that I cite are written by Jews.
Speaker 1: There's this amazing.
Speaker 2: Video that I did with The Prudentialist, a friend of
mine who's on this book titled about what Went Wrong.
It was written by a Jewish man. I think it
was a rabbi who wrote it, but it was about
the breakdown of the Jewish Black alliance in America. It's
this huge historical tone that goes like right from the
end of slavery up until I think like the seventies,
and he's just describing that. Basically the story is that
blacks never liked Jews, but Jews were always exploiting blacks
for their own political ends. Or this other great book
called Jewish Power by JJ Goldberg pousively reviewed by the
former Prime Minister of Israel, bestseller, mainstream book, and it
says basically everything you would find in anything from Kevin
MacDonald's Culture of Critique, any of that stuff, same thing.
Basically admitted everything you've heard about all these Jewish NGOs,
Like he says, yep, we have like over three hundred
and the only difference is, and this is what they're
saying Canada, is that we did it because when Europeans
are in charge, Jews suffer.
Speaker 1: So you deserve it.
Speaker 2: You know, we have to control the media, we have
to control politics, otherwise you would kill us.
Speaker 1: And so it's justified.
Speaker 2: That's from the book. So I'm like, okay, my can't
do I get in trouble for quoting this book kind
of you know, doesn't stop them from fucking banning us
so many times.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm it's you can't solve a problem unless you
can figure out who's doing it, you know, and you
have to be able to say who's doing it. Yeah,
if if it's if it's a Chinese, you're allowed to say, oh,
it's a Chinese, and then you're allowed to be like, okay,
and it's this Chinese individual. Hey, this person was a
chauffeur for one of our senators here and they're Chinese
and that's their name. But you're not because of you know,
some something that happened before any of us were born
or a lot of apparently we're not allowed to call
anyone out by name from that tribe because you know,
then all of a sudden, you know, six million of
them are in peril. Yeah.
Speaker 2: And one thing that we tried to and I know
John has done this throughout this conversation, it's to say
that what we're sitting at a car crash intersection of
many different problems, and in our space especially, we always
debate over what the principal problem is, like, Oh, it's
Jews causing this. Oh it's not Jews, it's actually liberalism
as an ideology. Oh no, it's not that, it's really
the Enlightenment. Oh it's really atheism. Oh it's really women.
And would say, well, actually, it's all those things at once,
and they play off of each other, and each one
of these needs to be identified and addressed as its
own thing. But we kind of get wrapped up in
this sort of Cartesian framework where everything flows from one
and you could say this group is involved in a
lot of this, which is true. But then it did explain,
like I said, it presented questions to the liberal order
that liberalism could not answer. Okay, so we must address
that inherent flaw in liberalism perhaps, and then we must address,
you know, what is a Canadian identity? Because one problem
they were able to exploit was that is there any
sort of internal consistency with Canadan identity? You know, one
of the things that separates Canada from the US is
that I think there is a permanent bifurcation between Anglo
and Franco Anglophone Francophone Canada. And you're never going to
resolve that, and it is what it is, and there's
no melting boton, so you're always going to have these
this collection of identities. If you look at the red
ensign symbols sort of the shield and the red ends,
and it's several identities bounce in one sort of commonwealth.
It's like, okay, but what can we do with that?
What is a Canadan identity? Because if you don't have
an answer for that, then multiculturalism is easy to blossom
in that total void, which is what happens. So it's
like we have to address all of these things at once.
And then the fact that you know, women seem to
be on the side, what do we do about them.
Speaker 1: You know, we're not going to.
Speaker 2: Get into all these problems today, but you know, one
thing we try and address is, you know, there's exploitations
for many different inputs right now. And as John correctly said,
we have you know, the funny thing about the Canadian
Anti Hate Network, that's our version of you know, like
like the anti FU group, that's what's what's the SPLC.
So our version is called the Anti can Anty. They're
the ones who direct ANTIPA to get people fired. It's
really just two people in the room. However, they modeled
themselves after you know, the American Jewish Congress, after the SPLC.
They said, all, we'll start that here. So one of
the issues of candadate is always just taking these like
echoes from America and doing our version of that here
and having American money funnel in, not to blame Americans,
but to blame these groups internationally with just setting out
posts up in Canada.
Speaker 3: I mean, Calvin Kaplanski was one of the most famous
Jewish operators when it came to this stuff. He operated
under the Jewish Labor Committee, which was a prominent labor union,
but he put boys in places of note so that
he could kind of hide what he was doing because,
you know, because of anti Semitism. He didn't want to
do it himself because then, you know, there would have
been an anti Semitic backlash. But he was funded. His
JLC group was funded by the American JLC out of
New York, and that's where his subordinates were trained, you know,
just to give an example of that American thing.
Speaker 1: Interesting, let's talk about this. So I was talking to
someone recently from Canada and they were saying that, like
a city like Brampton, which is what would you consider
that a suburb of Toronto?
Speaker 2: I would what every time I've gone there. It's like Mississauga,
I think of suburbs, Jehan, have you been there? Like,
I guess it is its own city though.
Speaker 3: Right, I'm from out west. I never been there.
Speaker 1: So, like the population is supposed to be like seven
hundred and fifty thousand or something like that. And you know,
he told me he's like twenty years ago it was
ninety five percent white. He goes, and now the population
is more than fifty percent, like well over fifty percent Indian.
Speaker 2: That's that's true. And so like Brampton is right beside
Mississauga as well. Mississauga for many many years has been
mostly Muslim and Arab, so that whole section over a
very short amount of time flipped to be brown. And
if you grew up, how fast?
Speaker 1: Yeah? How fast? So that's what I want to talking about.
How fast does something like that happen?
Speaker 2: Using Brampton and Mississauga as just personal anecdotes, like I
think it was within one generation at the very least,
maybe even shorter, maybe within ten years, but it happened,
Like I remember in my youth Mississauga just being like
Mississauga is like a suburb of Toronto. They're both outside
of part of what's called the GTA Great Toronto Area,
So people would just live in Mississauga and then commute
into downtown Toronto. So it was just you know, a suburb,
and then that just became filled with brown immigrants. And
it happened very fast, to the point we didn't even
know how it was happened, like how are these things
being funded? And the spigots are being controlled in India,
they're being controlled also by academias well bringing in these students.
But yeah, Brampton in short order became dominated by Indians
to the point where you know, you've probably read the
story where they erected something was like a thirty foot
statue Hanuman. Yes, that's right of one of their Like
it sounds racist when I say, but it's a monkey. God,
it's a half naked monkey man towering over it. And
then you know, as as a self respecting white man,
you behold that and say you're not serious, right, you
don't believe this, This is just goofy shit, right, But
they get it's important. Apparently it's and it's certainly one
of many that are plane And of course that was
erected as a show of force in that area to say,
we own this city, the city of Brampton.
Speaker 3: I can tell you how it happened too. Like the
Brampton thing, there's something called the Brampton loan or the
Brampton mortgage. That's what it's known as colloquially. CBC actually
did a big expose of this in twenty twenty two.
Mortgage fraud is rampant in Indian places because you have
Indian bankers, you have Indian real estate agents and other
white collar guys who can just fake employment records, bank
statements and t force to get people who could not
otherwise qualify to qualify for mortgages. And then they'll just
have eight or nine of them living in a house
working at Tim Horton's. And I'm not joking, like I say.
The CBC, our national broadcaster, did a big expose of
this thing at twenty twenty two. They went undercover in
Brampton and then every they didn't mention it, of course,
but every single person involved was Indian and they had like,
you know, the whole like undercover camera. They're like, we
sent our operatives in and there were Indian people. And
then they're like, here's what they found, and it'll be
like a guy like you can qualify. Even if you
do not qualify, you can qualify, no problem, no problem.
So you know, I'm not again not making it up.
This is all of the shit that we covered in
the documentary. Like it's all from like pro immigration sources theories.
Speaker 2: And also the same thing happened. I spoke to an
in a very interesting individual the named Gordon McGill. He's
a Canadian trucker. And the same thing as with the
real estate agents, happened with driving schools and trucking schools.
It just seemed over the course of a couple of years,
all of these independent outlets got set up with the
express purpose of just hand waving through it, specifically Indian drivers,
not testing them correctly. And then that has resulted. And
you know, if you've ever you know, I know, Jean,
you're not from here. But we have this main highway
and intari called the four oh one. It connects all
the major cities. And within the past couple of years,
I've noticed that these transport trucks are just in the
ditch the side of the road, flipped over, burned to
a crisp. And you never saw that growing up because
they just have these weaponized trucks driven by inept inbred
madmen barreling down the road because this whole matrix of
fraternal networks and you know, dark money flowing from India
has set it up here. And that's the stuff you
don't really hear about until it gets really, really bad,
so it becomes unignorable. And here it's unignorable in the
view of just blown up trucks on the side of
the road and the risk, the very real risk to families,
especially during the winter seasons. But you know the expos
on the real estate thing, Yes, there's an xpos from
our state broadcaster. But then what is the next step
because they don't want you to connect the dots, but
you have to connect the dots because no one else
in the world has that accent.
Speaker 3: When it comes to the trucking thing too, Like truckers
are approximately seventeen percent of all federally regulated workers. That
means workers that'll work, you know, across provinces, and they
yet they account for about fifty percent of employment like
mistreatment claims and stuff. And that's because a lot of
these guys are just indentured servants. Right, I'm not saying
like I have sympathy for them, but they are basically
slaves to other more wealthy Indians who bring them over here.
And that's why people say, oh, just put yourself foot
by your own bootstraps, Like these people aren't even getting
paid sometimes, so like, how are you supposed to compete
with that?
Speaker 2: And there's a ready made argument for you. You can
take the pro Indian side if you want, say, we
want to send them back for them, we don't want slaves.
That's kind of what was going on in America do
with H one B visa things like these people, you
want a slave class, You want to a whole cast
of serfs to serve you. And you know what, we
care too much about Indians to allow this. You can
do that and then let your fucking wife or girlfriend
make that argument for the rest of us. We're just
like I just I don't care. I just I don't
want this. I want you gone. And there's more people
now than ever before making that very very simple argument,
which is an argument that would been familiar to the
generations of people from this little documentary made, which is
that look, I'm a I'm a citizen. I'm a citizen.
In this scrit am I allowed to just say I
don't want it, and I don't need to justify it.
I'm a contain citizen. I shouldn't need to just fight.
You're asking me if I want this, I say no,
case clothes. You have to do what I say. And
then by degrees we learn what I say doesn't matter.
And also you learn quickly that whatever justification you can
come up with also doesn't matter. There's no way to
win this argument. There's no way to reason your way
with someone who wants to do this already for their own,
you know, selfish reasons.
Speaker 1: Well, let's uh, we only have about five six minutes left.
Let's end on this. Here in the United States, we
have Miami is a huge Cuban community. You have his
Spanish can unities out west. You know some some they
are little pockets everywhere, you know, when it comes down
to it, these are people from our hemisphere. A lot
of them are not raised in the greatest Christianity, but
they're raised in Christianity. You're dealing with people who are
coming from a drastically, drastically different culture. I'm talking about
like you know, if you I know that there's a
lot of people who just want to be complete purists.
But if you were to say, would you rather live
next to Mexicans or would you rather live next to Indians,
I think most people here would be like, well, I
think we'd rather stick We'd stick with the we'd stick
with the Mexicans.
Speaker 2: Well, so, if you're on the distant right or on
the maybe far right at all, you're probably used to
Hispanics being some of the loudest voices in this sector.
So you're already you're already you're already on that side
versus the new crop of Indians who came in advocating
for our points, which is like, there's something off about Like,
I don't believe them when they say they're on our side.
This sounds Yeah.
Speaker 1: Not even the cultural I mean, and the cultural issue
in a place like Branton and Mischicaga has to be
just awful. But I mean, you've had assassinations that were like,
weren't they sanctioned by like the Indian government?
Speaker 2: Yeah, and that's again jarring to people who didn't think
that was possible. Like, and you know, you'll find this interesting.
I don't know if you've read this book before. Camp
of the Saints by genre Spale.
Speaker 1: Read I read it on my show. I read I've
read the thoughts of book on my show.
Speaker 2: I just covered it with a good friend of mine,
T R. Hudson, on his show, Cannon fodd Or. We
both read recently. Everyone else has read it. We just
got to it recently, and I think it's a very
chilling but illuminating look at this specific problem because the
actors and that are mainly from India, from the Ganges,
and it really spells out that these people are from
a world apart from you, and you make a grave
error in thinking that. You know, you don't even necessarily
need to believe they're subhuman. We don't need to traffic
in that terminology if we don't want to. But you
can just say they're from another fucking dimension than you
like they don't you don't see. You can shake their
hand and say you both like rice and things. But
the way they engage with everything, from time to business
to everything else is different. And you realize that the
pro immigration position has been pushed up by this false
narrative that oh, they're just like us, they believe the
same things, they just want to work hard. Well, it's
like you don't even they don't even see working hard
the same way you do. They see cheating as working hard.
If they believe if you work hard, you're a sucker.
They believe cheating and grift is the way to do it. So,
you know, once you see stories like that about the assassination, like,
oh what Indians, why do they do that? They're so passive,
they're so docile. You'll hear them say that too. And
if you ever dealt with them, no, you need to
understand they're not they're running game on you and you were.
And as you know, if you ever.
Speaker 1: Worked with Indians, it's their culture. It's it's their culture,
it's who they are.
Speaker 2: Basically, white men fall victim to Indians because I made
a joke that they make white men feel like plantation owners.
You get this sort of like sniveling, pathetic white you know, Indians,
your Indian employees will be the ones who say, you
guys aren't nice enough to the boss. You should respect
the boss more. And you say, yeah, yeah, they should
like these guys they're ass sniffers. And so a lot
of older white men, gen X white men too, they
reallyel like, yeah, yeah, these people finally treat me the
way I deserve to be treated. You saw that with
the Indian political class too, But you get the sense
that this is just a game they're running.
Speaker 1: I don't and if you.
Speaker 2: Pay close attention, something's off. But it's hard to articulate.
And I had said before, like a couple of years ago,
I said, you know, the white people here are not
We don't have the firmware upgrade to deal with the
Indian threat. We just started to understand Islam. A lot
of us regular people kind of get Islam. They get
the Arab thing, the Muslim thing, they get the black thing,
they get the Jewish things on it. But it's like
you're not prepared for Indians like they they got a
different strategy.
Speaker 3: Can we touch on the civil war thing that's going
on with the Indians?
Speaker 2: And actually, sorry, I actually do need to go right now.
Can I just leave, Jean?
Speaker 1: Can you answer that? Yeah, yeah, yeah, go ahead.
Speaker 2: All the listeners. Sorry, I just had a doctor's appointment
that came up really close to the show, and so
I got to be out the door right now. I
just want to say thank you so much Pete for
allowing me on, Thank you Jean for joining us, and
amazing show. I'm so happy to be here.
Speaker 1: Thank you. All right, take care of yourself times. Uh yeah.
Speaker 3: So just really briefly to wrap up, So, the whole
Indian assassination thing is part of a larger problem where
there's like a civil war between six and Hindus. So
the majority of Indians in Canada historically and up to
the present day have been Sikhs and they want like
a separate homeland that they call Kalistan in northern India,
and the Indian government, which is dominated by Hindus, have
like an outstanding warrants on a lot of these guys.
They were responsible for the Air India bombing in nineteen
ninety three, and so what the Indian government did is
they assassinated a Kalistan guy. And the right wing in
Canada really hates the Kalistanis because they're incredibly disruptive, and
so they tend to support the Indian government, whereas the
left wing tend to support the Kalistanis because they see
them as freedom fighters. So you have white people basically
being involved in a proxy war depending on their side
of the political island Canada, instead of just standing up
for their own rights as white people and saying, why
the fuck are we having any of this in our country?
So that's that's a slummation of the of the Indian
problem with regards to the assassination.
Speaker 1: Wow, yeah, how does it get to that? You know,
you're you have enough problems with your own people, you
have your own history, you have you have your own economy,
and then you what you import a friggin civil war
from halfway around the world. And not only is it
a civil war from halfway around the world, they're from
a culture that is so alien to us that we
I had a I had an Indian gentleman on my
show not too long ago named name Jian Bundari, and
he's been warning about this. He's been warning about Indian
immigration into the West for a long you know, for
a long time. And what he said was he goes,
when you take into consideration like America, and I had
him when the whole h one B thing was going
on on Twitter. He said, when you take into consideration,
you have to think about the fact that you have people.
The people you have there are probably the best the
quote unquote best of India. And he said, you haven't
even met the average Indian yet, And that's when you
realize you're like, holy fuck. But then also it's like,
I mean, you have so many in Canada, I'm wondering
if you a lot of them are the average Indian
and you already have that there.
Speaker 3: Increasing they were finding that, you know, regardless of what
their quality as people are, they're coming here under false pretenses.
So like, for example, the international student thing, we have
eight hundred thousand international students here, and our Border Services
Agency and our RCMP federal police have been finding a
lot of guys who are coming here with fake letters
that have ties to gang activities. They're also finding that
approximately sixteen percent of those eight hundred thousand have no
record of enrolling in a Canadian institution. So I think
that the fact that the fraud is so rampant probably
speaks to the type of people that we're getting. You know,
in terms of my encounters on the street, it's hard
to say, you know, whether it's it's getting worse. I mean,
there's certainly a lot more Indians. Whether they're the ones
that I talked with before, you know, in my youth,
were better or worse, I'm not sure about that. That's
an interesting question.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I also heard something recently that the yeah, in
India you have a lot of diploma mills, and they
were figuring out that a lot of the Indians that
came there and became doctors weren't even qualified, weren't even doctors.
Speaker 3: Well, we have our own we have our own diploma
mills here. So like you know, Alberta is seen as
the most conservative, reactionary province here, you know, the most
based province for lack of a better word, and even
in that province, their premier Daniel Smith a couple of
years ago was like the main problem we have is
that we have too many academic institutions that are being
guarded about their standards. We need to have competing institutions.
So of course that was just time to ring the bell,
you know, time for more Indian people to come here
and get their get their visas and and uh you know,
get their permanent status. So it's like we it's it's
we have like I said, we have our diploma mills here.
When it comes to doctors, yeah, I mean, you know,
we have a shortage of doctors here. There's approximately one
thousand Canadian board doctors who studied at foreign institutions because
there are not enough spots to train doctors here in Canada,
and those are people who can't get accredited and a
lot of left wing people as Peach. You say, well,
they were trained at foreign institutions, their standards are not
as high as Canadian institutions. And I'm like, well, by
the same token, then why are you telling me that
all the immigrants that are coming here are doctors. They're
trained at the same institutions that you don't like Canadians
going to. So it's there's a there's a very funny
point to be made there.
Speaker 1: So with the recent with everything that happened with Trudeau recently,
do you see that the immigration issue having a big,
big and on that.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, it's funny because Trudeau's government actually stepped
back their immigration policies and they announced the reduction in
international students and temporary foreign workers going into the next year.
Of course, it probably won't be the government next year
because we'll probably have an election. The Conservatives will undoubtedly
get a majority, and so they've been criticized by the
Conservatives for talking about a reduction in immigration. So yes, this,
as Times alluded to earlier, this should be an immigration
campaign but funnily enough, the administration that got us into
this mess is the one who is fighting back the
hardest on immigration, and our conservatives are actually worse on immigration.
So it really is a terrible place to be. I mean,
the Conservative leader Pierre Paulia said that he wants to
have direct flights from to Ottawa from Amritzar. And Amritsar
is one of the major cities in the Punjab region
of India. It's a seek stronghold. And again the majority
of Indians that come here are Sekhs, So I mean,
this is the type of rhetoric. I mean, the Trudeau
government deported international students who were here under false pretenses,
you know, fake letters, or they weren't they weren't in
school or whatever, and Paul Yev gave a speech denouncing
that and said we shouldn't be deporting these people. So
we do have an upstart political party called the People's
Party of Canada, which is run by our former defense
minister under the Conservative Harper government. His name is Maxim Bernier,
and he's announced that he wants to complete moratorium on immigration.
So his rhetoric is actually much stronger than even Trump's rhetoric.
But the funny thing about that political party is now,
if you look at the candidates, it's a ton of
Indians and a ton of black people. And so, you know,
reactionaries in Canada rightly said, okay, so we're doing sivnat stuff,
but we're not, like what are you doing here, bro?
So now there's a big fight between the true nationalist
self described true nationalists, true reactionaries in Canada, and then
the PPC members themselves are like, no, it's okay, bro.
This guy's based. Bro. He can't speak English, but he's
totally based if you talk to him. So it's a
complete mess.
Speaker 1: Hey, but at least poly have like disrespected a journalist
is eating an apple and everything. Oh that was.
Speaker 3: And you know what, he's such a dweed. And I've
always said this, especially now that Trudeau's got divorced dad
energy and he's on his way out. Trueau has done
a couple of charity boxing matches. He beat up a
Conservative senator and named Patrick Brazo in the mid Ots
and I was like, Dan, you should just box Pauliyev
because he's been talking all this shit. He's a dweve,
he's a nerd. He's a lot smaller than you. Like,
just come on, justin. We know you've got a six
pack still, bro, just like go after him. I mean obviously,
I mean that's not gonna happen, but it would be
mad funny because like this, yeah, Pauliev's is like, you know,
he's got all these stupid nicknames for Trudeau and for
the other opposition leaders. He's a real snarky guy, and
it would just be funny to see him, you know,
get his clock cleaned. But I digress.
Speaker 1: Probably have just reminds me of like these classical liberals
that we have here, like the James Lindsay types. It's like,
you know, we want liberty, but it's liberty for everyone
because you know, you can import anyone and anyone can
become a Canadian or anyone can become an American. It's like, yeah,
it doesn't work that way. You know, when my family
came here, they had to like completely, like openly renounce
where they came from. You know, I'm no longer a
subjective there. I'm here and for better or worse, and
I'm not sending money home. I'm not. No, this is
where I am, this is where I stand, you know,
and I'm going to serve and do whatever I want,
do whatever the country asked me to do. And the
whole classical liberal type, that whole oh you just you know,
because because they take an oath and it's like, okay, yeah,
this isn't I'm sorry, these aren't. These aren't Europeans.
Speaker 3: I think that, you know, Canada is almost in a
better place in the sense that we do have multiculturalism.
And what I mean by that is the multiculturalism thing
was an artificial policy put in place October eighth, nineteen
seventy one by per Trudeau, and he fundamentally denounced the
bicultural that is, the Francophone angle phone split in Canada
in favor of multiculturalism, and since then, especially in line
with all these government programs where it's like you have
to have a quote of you know, non whites or
women are indigenous people and if your Indigenous or black,
you're going to get a lighter sentence. Like all these incentives,
along with multiculturalism, draw people who are not white to
focus on the fact that they're not white and keep
their identity in mind and not assimilate, like because we
don't have that melting pot. I think the only people
who assimilate naturally to the Canadian identity is white people
because they don't really have a reason not to. And
that's just what you know, that's ethnogenesis, that just happens naturally,
whereas all these other people are incentivized to remain on
the outside. So it's almost like, even though we have
the multiculturalism, the people who are the true Canadians are
generally white people because other people don't assimbly, and so
it's kind of easier to tell people of part even
if they've been here for several generations. It's just something
that we were talking about Dimes and I on Boyce's show.
Speaker 1: Cool. All right, well I'm gonna get out of here. Thanks,
thanks for coming on and talking about this because yeah,
I mean, like I said, we just yesterday was inauguration
day here and what most people who voted for the
guy down here are worried about his immigration and that's
a big topic. But you guys have been dealing with
it up there, and I mean, I don't know, I
don't know who has it worse off at this point.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's a different problem.
Speaker 1: Great to see you.
Speaker 3: I'll sign off, but before I do, when can we
expect the next two hundred years to gather segment because
I've been following those and that's pretty cool.
Speaker 1: That'll be tomorrow at eleven am eleven am Central of noon. Yeah,
we're doing two of those a week, so Wednesdays. I'm
reallyasing on Wednesday at eleven am and Saturday at eleven am.
As long as we don't know, myself or doctor Johnson
don't have something that we that takes takes us away
from our ability to do it. So I do appreciate that.
Thank you. That's going to be it's a huge project,
but I think it's gonna be one that people are
going to be referencing for, you know, decades.
Speaker 3: I'm stoked on it. Okay, man, Well, thanks so much.
Speaker 1: I'll see you later, all right, Thanks, Shall I back