WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>What's up everyone, and welcome to another episode of the

2
00:00:03.040 --> 00:00:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Epstein Chronicles. So the Pam Bondie transcript has been released,

3
00:00:09.359 --> 00:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and in this episode we're going to begin taking a

4
00:00:11.679 --> 00:00:14.919
<v Speaker 1>look at what she had to say about her part

5
00:00:15.240 --> 00:00:19.679
<v Speaker 1>in the ongoing Epstein cover up. Mister Emmer, we will

6
00:00:19.679 --> 00:00:22.679
<v Speaker 1>go on the record. This is a transcribed interview of

7
00:00:22.719 --> 00:00:26.760
<v Speaker 1>former Attorney General Pamela Jay Bondi, conducted by the House

8
00:00:26.800 --> 00:00:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Committee on Oversight and Government Reform under the authority granted

9
00:00:30.920 --> 00:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in pursuant to the House Rule X. According to the

10
00:00:34.039 --> 00:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>House Rule X grants the Committee broad jurisdiction for the

11
00:00:38.000 --> 00:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Committee to conduct investigations of any matter at any time.

12
00:00:43.039 --> 00:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>This interview was requested by Chairman James Comer as part

13
00:00:46.600 --> 00:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Committee's investigation into the circumstances and subsequent investigations

14
00:00:51.600 --> 00:00:55.359
<v Speaker 1>into the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein and Glenn Maxwell, the

15
00:00:55.399 --> 00:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>operation of sex trafficking rings and the ways for the

16
00:00:58.600 --> 00:01:02.039
<v Speaker 1>federal government to effectively combat them, the ways in which

17
00:01:02.079 --> 00:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>mister Epstein and miss Maxwell sought to curry favor and

18
00:01:05.519 --> 00:01:09.439
<v Speaker 1>exercise influence to protect their legal activity, and a potential

19
00:01:09.519 --> 00:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>violation of ethics rules related to elected officials. Can the

20
00:01:13.519 --> 00:01:16.439
<v Speaker 1>witness please state her name and spell her last name

21
00:01:16.439 --> 00:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>for the record. Bondi sure, Pamela Bondi bo and du

22
00:01:22.159 --> 00:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>Y Emmer thank you. My name is Jack Emmer and

23
00:01:26.000 --> 00:01:29.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm the Chief of Council for Investigation for Chairman James Gomer.

24
00:01:30.359 --> 00:01:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Under the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform rules, you're

25
00:01:33.879 --> 00:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>allowed to have one Council President to advise you during

26
00:01:36.719 --> 00:01:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the interview. Do you have counsel representing you in a

27
00:01:39.719 --> 00:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>personal capacity present with you today? BONDI only as my

28
00:01:44.519 --> 00:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>when I was Attorney General for the United States, and

29
00:01:47.159 --> 00:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that's har Meat Dylan another winner, another absolute moron, har

30
00:01:51.760 --> 00:01:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Meat Dylan Emmer. Will counsel please identify themselves for the record. Dylan. Yes,

31
00:02:00.079 --> 00:02:03.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm Harmeat Dylon, the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights,

32
00:02:04.040 --> 00:02:06.079
<v Speaker 1>and I'm here on behalf of the United States Department

33
00:02:06.159 --> 00:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of Justice, as the former Attorney General was subpoenaed and

34
00:02:09.599 --> 00:02:14.039
<v Speaker 1>disappearing here voluntarily in her official capacity only, and accordingly,

35
00:02:14.240 --> 00:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm here to represent the interest of the DOJ and

36
00:02:17.039 --> 00:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>its interest in effectuating the Transparency Act, and solely to

37
00:02:20.960 --> 00:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>be here on behalf of the DOJ. I'm also accompanied

38
00:02:25.319 --> 00:02:28.159
<v Speaker 1>by one of my colleagues, and he'll state his appearance

39
00:02:28.199 --> 00:02:34.639
<v Speaker 1>as well. Mister Ginn, I'm Jonathan Ginn, Deputy Assistant Attorney

40
00:02:34.639 --> 00:02:37.199
<v Speaker 1>General for Civil Division, and I'm here appearing in the

41
00:02:37.199 --> 00:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>same capacity as Miss Dylan. Mister Emmer, we have members

42
00:02:41.360 --> 00:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of Congress here with us today. For the records, starting

43
00:02:43.840 --> 00:02:47.199
<v Speaker 1>with the Chairman, can members please identify themselves for the record?

44
00:02:48.439 --> 00:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>James Comer, Chairman Kentucky, Mister Garcia, Ranking Member Robert Garcia,

45
00:02:54.520 --> 00:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Congressman Sue has Submerennium, Yasimin and sorry, James Walkinshaw, Maxwell Frost,

46
00:03:04.280 --> 00:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Melanie Stansbury, mister Emmer for the records, Starting with the

47
00:03:08.400 --> 00:03:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Majority staff, Can the additional staff members please introduce themselves

48
00:03:12.360 --> 00:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>with their name, title and affiliation. Billy Grant, Deputy Chief

49
00:03:17.000 --> 00:03:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Council for Investigations, Chairman Comer, Daniel Ashworth, General Counsel for

50
00:03:22.360 --> 00:03:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Chairman Comber, Ryan Gaketty, Chief Council Chairman Comer, Ellison Tolan,

51
00:03:28.599 --> 00:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Council for Chairman Comber, and the list goes on. We're

52
00:03:32.400 --> 00:03:35.319
<v Speaker 1>going to pick back up with the conversation though, mister Emmer,

53
00:03:35.439 --> 00:03:38.639
<v Speaker 1>thank you all. Attorney General BONDI, before we begin, I

54
00:03:38.639 --> 00:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>would like to go over the ground rules for the

55
00:03:40.520 --> 00:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>transcribed interview. The questioning will proceed in rounds. The majority

56
00:03:44.719 --> 00:03:46.919
<v Speaker 1>will ask questions for up to an hour, and then

57
00:03:46.919 --> 00:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the minority will have an opportunity to ask questions for

58
00:03:49.719 --> 00:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>an hour if they choose to the extent. Members have

59
00:03:53.400 --> 00:03:57.039
<v Speaker 1>questions for the witness, they'll be propounded during their sides

60
00:03:57.120 --> 00:03:59.879
<v Speaker 1>respective rounds. The clock will stop if you need to

61
00:04:00.000 --> 00:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>confer with counsel. Your counsel speaking, and when members of

62
00:04:03.400 --> 00:04:06.919
<v Speaker 1>staff are speaking during the opposing side rounds of questions,

63
00:04:07.199 --> 00:04:10.719
<v Speaker 1>we will alternate back and forth until there's no more questions.

64
00:04:10.759 --> 00:04:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Do you understand BONDI yeah, Emmer. There's court reporter taking

65
00:04:15.319 --> 00:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>down everything I say and everything you say to make

66
00:04:18.040 --> 00:04:20.759
<v Speaker 1>a written record of the interview. For the record to

67
00:04:20.800 --> 00:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>be clear, please wait until the staff for questioning you

68
00:04:23.439 --> 00:04:27.439
<v Speaker 1>finishes each question before you begin your answer, and the

69
00:04:27.439 --> 00:04:31.079
<v Speaker 1>staffer will wait until you finish your response before proceeding

70
00:04:31.360 --> 00:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to the next question. Further, to ensure that the court

71
00:04:34.519 --> 00:04:39.399
<v Speaker 1>reporter can properly record this transcribed interview, please speak clearly, concisely,

72
00:04:39.759 --> 00:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and slowly. Also, the court reporter cannot record nonverbal answers

73
00:04:44.720 --> 00:04:47.639
<v Speaker 1>such as nodding or shaking your head, so it's important

74
00:04:47.920 --> 00:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that you answer each question with an audible verbal answer.

75
00:04:51.399 --> 00:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you understand BONDI? Yeah? Emmer exhibits may be entered

76
00:04:55.959 --> 00:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>into the record. Majority exhibits will be identified numerically, Minority

77
00:05:00.600 --> 00:05:04.759
<v Speaker 1>exhibits will be identified alphabetically. We want you to answer

78
00:05:04.759 --> 00:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>our questions in the most complete and truthful manner possible,

79
00:05:08.560 --> 00:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>so we will take our time. If you have any

80
00:05:11.199 --> 00:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>questions or do not fully understand the question, please let

81
00:05:14.240 --> 00:05:17.480
<v Speaker 1>us know. We will attempt to clarify, add context to,

82
00:05:17.839 --> 00:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>or rephrase our questions. If we ask about specific conversations

83
00:05:21.920 --> 00:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>or events in the past and you're unable to recall

84
00:05:24.639 --> 00:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the exact words or details, you should testify to the

85
00:05:28.199 --> 00:05:31.639
<v Speaker 1>substance of those conversations or events to the best of

86
00:05:31.680 --> 00:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>your recollection. If you recall only part of the conversation

87
00:05:35.279 --> 00:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>or event, you should give us your best recollection of

88
00:05:38.279 --> 00:05:41.519
<v Speaker 1>those events or parts of conversations that you do recall.

89
00:05:41.759 --> 00:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you understand BONDI yes? Question. Although you're here voluntarily,

90
00:05:47.000 --> 00:05:50.319
<v Speaker 1>you're acquired by law pursuant the Title eighteen of the

91
00:05:50.399 --> 00:05:53.399
<v Speaker 1>United States Code, Section one thousand and one to answer

92
00:05:53.519 --> 00:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>questions from Congress truthfully This also applies to questions posed

93
00:05:57.959 --> 00:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>by Congressional staff in the interview do you understand Bondy yes? Question?

94
00:06:03.639 --> 00:06:06.279
<v Speaker 1>If at any time you knowingly make false statements, you

95
00:06:06.319 --> 00:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>could be subject to criminal prosecution. Do you understand Bondy yes? Emmer.

96
00:06:12.040 --> 00:06:15.879
<v Speaker 1>This includes knowingly providing false testimony, but also stating you

97
00:06:15.920 --> 00:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>do not recall or remember something when in fact you do.

98
00:06:19.120 --> 00:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you understand Bondy yes, Emmer. Furthermore, you cannot tell

99
00:06:24.399 --> 00:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>half truth or exclude information necessary to make statements accurate.

100
00:06:28.839 --> 00:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>You're required to provide all information that would make your

101
00:06:31.720 --> 00:06:36.399
<v Speaker 1>response truthful. A deliberate failure to disclose information can constitute

102
00:06:36.439 --> 00:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>a false statement. Do you understand bond yes? Emmer. Is

103
00:06:40.839 --> 00:06:43.879
<v Speaker 1>there any reason you're unable to provide truthful testimony in

104
00:06:43.920 --> 00:06:47.759
<v Speaker 1>today's interview? Bondy no, Emmer. Please note that if you

105
00:06:47.800 --> 00:06:51.439
<v Speaker 1>wish to assert a privilege over any statement today, that

106
00:06:51.519 --> 00:06:54.439
<v Speaker 1>assertion must comply with the rules of the Committee on

107
00:06:54.879 --> 00:06:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Oversight and Government Reform pursu into that committee. Rule sixteen

108
00:06:58.800 --> 00:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>C one states for the chair to consider assertions a

109
00:07:02.439 --> 00:07:07.639
<v Speaker 1>privilege over testimony, your statements, witnesses or entities must clearly

110
00:07:07.680 --> 00:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>state the specific privilege be an asserted and the reason

111
00:07:10.959 --> 00:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>for the assertion, honor before the scheduled date of testimony

112
00:07:14.920 --> 00:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>or appearance. Do you understand, Bondy, yes, Emmer. Ordinarily we

113
00:07:19.600 --> 00:07:21.759
<v Speaker 1>take a five minute break at the end of each

114
00:07:21.800 --> 00:07:24.319
<v Speaker 1>hour of questioning, but if you need a longer break

115
00:07:24.519 --> 00:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>or a break before that, please let us know and

116
00:07:26.600 --> 00:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll be happy to accommodate. However, to the extent that

117
00:07:29.959 --> 00:07:32.319
<v Speaker 1>there's a pending question, we would ask you to finish

118
00:07:32.439 --> 00:07:36.199
<v Speaker 1>answering the question before we take a break. Do you understand,

119
00:07:36.519 --> 00:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>bond Y, yes, Emmer. I would like to remind anyone

120
00:07:39.600 --> 00:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>here today that the taking of still photography and the

121
00:07:43.040 --> 00:07:46.759
<v Speaker 1>recording of video of any part of today's proceeding is prohibited.

122
00:07:47.439 --> 00:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General Bondi. Do you have any other questions before

123
00:07:50.279 --> 00:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>we begin? Bondy no, Emmer. Do you have an opening

124
00:07:53.519 --> 00:07:57.759
<v Speaker 1>statement that you'll be reading into the record? Bond Y, yes, please, Emmer,

125
00:07:57.839 --> 00:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you may proceed. Bondy, good morning. Before we start today,

126
00:08:02.120 --> 00:08:05.079
<v Speaker 1>I want to reiterate what I've said many times regarding

127
00:08:05.120 --> 00:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the Department's handling during my tenure as Attorney General of

128
00:08:09.079 --> 00:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the voluminous materials that are now commonly known as the

129
00:08:12.360 --> 00:08:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Epstein Files. I'm proud of the Department's record and commitment

130
00:08:16.680 --> 00:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to transparency. Under my leadership, we demonstrated an unprecedented commitment

131
00:08:22.199 --> 00:08:25.959
<v Speaker 1>to transparency in the department search for collection and review

132
00:08:26.240 --> 00:08:30.199
<v Speaker 1>of the Epstein Files, producing nearly three pages of material,

133
00:08:30.519 --> 00:08:33.799
<v Speaker 1>including thousands of videos and hundreds of thousands of images.

134
00:08:34.879 --> 00:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>These investigations span four administrations, dating back to the Bush

135
00:08:38.679 --> 00:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>administration and have gone on through the Obama administration, the

136
00:08:43.039 --> 00:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>first Trump administration, the Biden administration. The only time federal

137
00:08:47.519 --> 00:08:51.759
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors were permitted to launch investigations against Epstein and Maxwell

138
00:08:52.080 --> 00:08:55.879
<v Speaker 1>was when President Trump occupied the White House. Only under

139
00:08:56.000 --> 00:09:00.399
<v Speaker 1>President Trump were three million Epstein related documents released. This

140
00:09:00.559 --> 00:09:04.279
<v Speaker 1>was an enormously complicated and labor intensive process. To the

141
00:09:04.279 --> 00:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>best of my knowledge, the Department produced everything required under

142
00:09:07.879 --> 00:09:11.919
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Our diligent and good faith

143
00:09:11.960 --> 00:09:16.279
<v Speaker 1>effort to collect materials ensured that all potentially responsive documents

144
00:09:16.559 --> 00:09:19.799
<v Speaker 1>that could be reasonably located would see the light of day.

145
00:09:20.519 --> 00:09:24.799
<v Speaker 1>All Department components were directed to submit any potential responsive records,

146
00:09:25.000 --> 00:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>resulting in a comprehensive review of millions of documents. At

147
00:09:29.600 --> 00:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>the head of a large department with broad responsibility. I

148
00:09:32.600 --> 00:09:35.799
<v Speaker 1>did not lead every aspect of this effort, nor conduct

149
00:09:35.960 --> 00:09:40.399
<v Speaker 1>the document review myself. I delegated that oversight over the

150
00:09:40.480 --> 00:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>process to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. The team of

151
00:09:44.600 --> 00:09:47.799
<v Speaker 1>professionals who were reviewed the material that we collected assured

152
00:09:47.799 --> 00:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>me the only material that were withheld were either non responsive, privileged,

153
00:09:52.639 --> 00:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>or duplicative. Although not required by the Act, the Department

154
00:09:56.600 --> 00:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>has given Congress access to unredacted duplicative material in the

155
00:10:00.480 --> 00:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>reading room in an effort to maximize transparency. There were

156
00:10:05.399 --> 00:10:08.279
<v Speaker 1>redaction errors, but since day one of the process, the

157
00:10:08.360 --> 00:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Department has been committed to accountability and transparency. Our stance

158
00:10:13.039 --> 00:10:15.639
<v Speaker 1>has always been that the Department stands ready to review

159
00:10:15.919 --> 00:10:19.519
<v Speaker 1>any potential evidence of criminal activity related to Ebstein and

160
00:10:19.559 --> 00:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>his associates, and would pursue the appropriate investigations or prosecutorial

161
00:10:24.879 --> 00:10:28.519
<v Speaker 1>actions wherever the facts in law warrant. I would like

162
00:10:28.559 --> 00:10:31.279
<v Speaker 1>to repeat what I shared before the House Judiciary Committee

163
00:10:31.320 --> 00:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in February. I've spent my entire career fighting for victims,

164
00:10:35.200 --> 00:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>and I'll continue to do so. I am deeply sorry

165
00:10:38.879 --> 00:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>for what any victim has been through, especially as a

166
00:10:41.600 --> 00:10:45.159
<v Speaker 1>result of that monster. If they have any information to

167
00:10:45.200 --> 00:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>share with law enforcement about anyone who has hurt them

168
00:10:48.240 --> 00:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>or abused them. The FBI is waiting to hear from them.

169
00:10:52.000 --> 00:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>The bottom line is justice and transparency in this matter

170
00:10:55.320 --> 00:10:58.759
<v Speaker 1>have been delivered at the direction of President Trump and

171
00:10:58.840 --> 00:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>his administration. Thank you, mister Emmer, Thank you. We've had

172
00:11:03.240 --> 00:11:06.759
<v Speaker 1>another member of Congress join. Can he please identify himself

173
00:11:06.759 --> 00:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>for the record, mister min Congressman Dave min Emmer. Attorney

174
00:11:11.480 --> 00:11:13.879
<v Speaker 1>General Bondie, I just want to thank you again for

175
00:11:14.000 --> 00:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>participating in today's proceeding and for your years the public service,

176
00:11:18.440 --> 00:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>both to our country and the state of Florida. I

177
00:11:21.159 --> 00:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>want to recognize that you're currently undergoing cancer treatment, and

178
00:11:24.200 --> 00:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll say that we will do our best to ask

179
00:11:26.240 --> 00:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>all the questions in the most efficient and timely way possible.

180
00:11:30.480 --> 00:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>So let's start by briefly discussing your education and experience.

181
00:11:34.919 --> 00:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I understand that you've had a long career, but can

182
00:11:37.240 --> 00:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you summarize it for the record. Bondie Sure. I went

183
00:11:41.000 --> 00:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to the University of Florida undergraduate. I graduated from Stetson

184
00:11:44.759 --> 00:11:48.039
<v Speaker 1>College of Law. I was a prosecutor in Hillsborough County,

185
00:11:48.039 --> 00:11:52.519
<v Speaker 1>Florida for eighteen years. Prosecuting almost every kind of crime imaginable,

186
00:11:53.039 --> 00:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>from first degree murders all the way to domestic violence.

187
00:11:56.720 --> 00:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>I was Felony Bureau Chief there as well. I also

188
00:11:59.799 --> 00:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>be the Attorney General for the State of Florida, where

189
00:12:02.360 --> 00:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I served for eight years, and then for the past

190
00:12:05.039 --> 00:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>year I was Attorney General of the United States. Question

191
00:12:09.399 --> 00:12:12.759
<v Speaker 1>by Emmer, So let's talk about your time as Attorney general.

192
00:12:13.080 --> 00:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>You started in February of twenty twenty five. Is that correct? Answer? Yes,

193
00:12:17.519 --> 00:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>question by Emmer. And as it relates to Jeffrey Epstein, matter,

194
00:12:21.480 --> 00:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>when you assumed office, what was the DOJ doing? Answer

195
00:12:25.960 --> 00:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>when I assumed regarding Epstein Emer Yes, Bondie, when I

196
00:12:29.919 --> 00:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>assumed office, nothing to my knowledge and nothing had been released,

197
00:12:33.679 --> 00:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if it had been requested to

198
00:12:35.600 --> 00:12:40.039
<v Speaker 1>be released. Emmer. Did you direct the Department to conduct

199
00:12:40.039 --> 00:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a review of the Epstein and Maxwell investigation? Answer immediately,

200
00:12:44.080 --> 00:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean within weeks of assuming office. Question can you

201
00:12:47.559 --> 00:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>describe for the committee what that looked like? Answer? Yes,

202
00:12:51.360 --> 00:12:53.519
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to the FBI and we asked them to

203
00:12:53.559 --> 00:12:58.399
<v Speaker 1>turn over all the documents in their possession related to Epstein. Emmer,

204
00:12:58.720 --> 00:13:01.399
<v Speaker 1>and as far as the those documents What was the

205
00:13:01.480 --> 00:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>DOJ going to do with those documents? Bondy, provide transparency

206
00:13:06.360 --> 00:13:08.799
<v Speaker 1>and release them to the public and the Congress, of course.

207
00:13:09.399 --> 00:13:13.039
<v Speaker 1>Question by Emmer. And I believe you said that started

208
00:13:13.080 --> 00:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>immediately upon your assuming office. Is that right, Bondy, I

209
00:13:16.480 --> 00:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>believe within weeks Emmer. And as far as providing transparency,

210
00:13:20.639 --> 00:13:23.159
<v Speaker 1>was there a specific timeline that you provided to the

211
00:13:23.240 --> 00:13:27.879
<v Speaker 1>FBI to follow as far as releasing the documents? Bondi, yeah,

212
00:13:27.960 --> 00:13:31.039
<v Speaker 1>it was prior to Director Bettel being confirmed. I believe

213
00:13:31.080 --> 00:13:33.879
<v Speaker 1>when the process started and we received from the FBI

214
00:13:33.919 --> 00:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>approximately three hundred documents that were released. Emmer. And to

215
00:13:38.679 --> 00:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>be clear, you directed this internal review of the Epstein matter.

216
00:13:42.360 --> 00:13:44.879
<v Speaker 1>There was no other review that was occurring prior to

217
00:13:44.879 --> 00:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you assuming office. Answer not to my knowledge question. Also

218
00:13:49.279 --> 00:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>for the record, the Epstein and Maxwell investigation was considered

219
00:13:52.720 --> 00:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>closed upon you taking office answer to my knowledge yes.

220
00:13:56.840 --> 00:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Question When were you first briefed on the Eptie Stein

221
00:14:00.279 --> 00:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Maxwell matter? Answer by Bondi initially after we received again

222
00:14:04.720 --> 00:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>approximately three hundred documents and those were released, and I

223
00:14:08.360 --> 00:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>believe that was the tip of the iceberg, that that

224
00:14:10.679 --> 00:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the FBI had not turned over all the documents. Director

225
00:14:14.600 --> 00:14:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Patel eventually was confirmed, and I sent him a letter

226
00:14:17.360 --> 00:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>asking him to look into that and give us any

227
00:14:20.240 --> 00:14:23.519
<v Speaker 1>other documents in the FBI's possession anywhere in the country,

228
00:14:23.879 --> 00:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately we received much more. Question and for the record,

229
00:14:29.120 --> 00:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>who would have been briefing you on the Epstein matter

230
00:14:31.279 --> 00:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>as far as one you took office, Bondie Todd Blanche question,

231
00:14:37.039 --> 00:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>what specific concerns did the department have as it related

232
00:14:40.120 --> 00:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to the Epstein and Maxwell matter when you assumed office?

233
00:14:44.159 --> 00:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Answer that nothing was released And again to my knowledge,

234
00:14:47.519 --> 00:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>no one that spanned the Biden administration or previously had

235
00:14:51.039 --> 00:14:53.639
<v Speaker 1>sought to release any of the information. And I believe

236
00:14:53.679 --> 00:14:56.559
<v Speaker 1>it was within weeks of me assuming office that we

237
00:14:56.639 --> 00:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>asked for and demanded all these documents. Emmer, do you

238
00:15:01.360 --> 00:15:04.879
<v Speaker 1>recall whether there were concerns that there was potentially unindicted

239
00:15:04.879 --> 00:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>co conspirators? Answer always yes. All right, folks, we're gonna

240
00:15:09.720 --> 00:15:11.919
<v Speaker 1>wrap up right here, and in the next episode dealing

241
00:15:11.960 --> 00:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>with the topic, we're gonna pick up where we left off.

242
00:15:15.000 --> 00:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>All the information that goes with this episode can be

243
00:15:17.279 --> 00:15:20.679
<v Speaker 1>found in the description box. What's up, everyone, and welcome

244
00:15:20.679 --> 00:15:24.519
<v Speaker 1>to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. In this episode,

245
00:15:24.519 --> 00:15:31.639
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get right back to the Pam Bondi transcript. Emmer, So,

246
00:15:31.840 --> 00:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>at the time that you directed this review, was there

247
00:15:34.519 --> 00:15:39.799
<v Speaker 1>any sort of plan of what the review would consist of? Bondi? Well, initially, again,

248
00:15:40.000 --> 00:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>we only received several hundred documents and they were released

249
00:15:43.000 --> 00:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>upon reaction by the FBI. Then, once Director but Tell

250
00:15:46.360 --> 00:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>assumed disposition, we found many more documents, and as we

251
00:15:50.000 --> 00:15:53.159
<v Speaker 1>receive those, those were reviewed and released. And we have

252
00:15:53.200 --> 00:15:55.279
<v Speaker 1>always made it very clear that if anyone is the

253
00:15:55.360 --> 00:15:58.039
<v Speaker 1>victim of Jeffrey Epstein, and I count Clain Maxwell in

254
00:15:58.080 --> 00:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>there too, she's just as evil as Jeffrey Epstein was,

255
00:16:01.679 --> 00:16:04.639
<v Speaker 1>that they come forward to us the FBI. Many of

256
00:16:04.679 --> 00:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>these victims are represented by lawyers and talk to us. Emmer.

257
00:16:08.919 --> 00:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Upon taking office, did any victims or victim attorneys reach

258
00:16:12.120 --> 00:16:17.559
<v Speaker 1>out to the department? Bondi, yes, Emmer, how many, Bondie,

259
00:16:17.559 --> 00:16:19.919
<v Speaker 1>I can't recall how many. I know multiple. There were

260
00:16:20.000 --> 00:16:22.799
<v Speaker 1>multiple victims and many of which I believe the majority

261
00:16:22.960 --> 00:16:26.759
<v Speaker 1>are represented by attorneys. Emmer. Did you meet with them

262
00:16:26.759 --> 00:16:29.399
<v Speaker 1>personally or would that have been something that Todd Blanche

263
00:16:29.399 --> 00:16:33.279
<v Speaker 1>would have done? Answer Bondi. No, I spoke to one attorney.

264
00:16:33.440 --> 00:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't recall her name. She was a former prosecutor,

265
00:16:36.279 --> 00:16:38.759
<v Speaker 1>and she seemed to deeply care about these victims, of course,

266
00:16:39.080 --> 00:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and I spoke to her, and I believe I referred

267
00:16:41.320 --> 00:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>her to the FBI. You know, when a victim is represented,

268
00:16:44.480 --> 00:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you go through their attorney, and I spoke to her directly,

269
00:16:47.600 --> 00:16:49.679
<v Speaker 1>and then I know many of the lawyers in my

270
00:16:49.720 --> 00:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>office spoke to other attorneys, and I believe the FBI

271
00:16:52.519 --> 00:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>spoke to multiple victims as well. But I would direct

272
00:16:55.799 --> 00:16:59.879
<v Speaker 1>that to Deputy Attorney General now Acting Attorney General Blanche,

273
00:17:00.080 --> 00:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and also director of Battel Emmer. You would have been

274
00:17:04.039 --> 00:17:06.559
<v Speaker 1>briefed on these meetings with victims and their attorneys, is

275
00:17:06.599 --> 00:17:11.279
<v Speaker 1>that right, BONDI, I have not been. After the fact,

276
00:17:11.720 --> 00:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>question Okay, do you have any idea what the victims

277
00:17:14.640 --> 00:17:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and their attorneys were concerned about during the time period

278
00:17:18.119 --> 00:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>of February and spring of twenty twenty five? BONDI only

279
00:17:22.160 --> 00:17:24.279
<v Speaker 1>the attorney that I spoke to, and she was just

280
00:17:24.359 --> 00:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>concerned about being heard and these victims being heard. Emmer,

281
00:17:29.079 --> 00:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh huh? Were they interested in files being released at

282
00:17:32.039 --> 00:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the time? Answer? I don't recall. Question Okay, you mentioned

283
00:17:38.279 --> 00:17:42.039
<v Speaker 1>Director Battel and the FBI. Were there any other agencies

284
00:17:42.079 --> 00:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that were involved in the review of documents during this period, Bondi,

285
00:17:47.200 --> 00:17:51.079
<v Speaker 1>the FBI, the DOJ, multiple components of the DOJ, my

286
00:17:51.240 --> 00:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>National Security Division at the time, and then ultimately we

287
00:17:54.599 --> 00:17:58.079
<v Speaker 1>received multiple documents. We used attorneys from around the country,

288
00:17:58.359 --> 00:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>including Florida and New York. Emmer, and I know I

289
00:18:02.359 --> 00:18:05.319
<v Speaker 1>asked you about potential co conspirators earlier, but when you

290
00:18:05.319 --> 00:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>were reviewing these initial documents in the spring of twenty

291
00:18:08.519 --> 00:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, were there ever any plans to pursue investigations

292
00:18:12.240 --> 00:18:16.079
<v Speaker 1>into potential co conspirators? Answer? I'm sorry, what month did

293
00:18:16.079 --> 00:18:19.759
<v Speaker 1>you say? Emmer? Upon assuming office and during the spring

294
00:18:20.039 --> 00:18:23.799
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty five, Bondy, if there were co conspirators

295
00:18:23.880 --> 00:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>or evidence that anyone committed a crime that could be

296
00:18:26.440 --> 00:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>proven in a courtroom, it's any prosecutor's duty to pursue that, Emmer,

297
00:18:31.880 --> 00:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General Bondi. On February twenty first, twenty twenty five,

298
00:18:35.680 --> 00:18:38.519
<v Speaker 1>just over two weeks after you were sworn in as AG,

299
00:18:39.319 --> 00:18:42.319
<v Speaker 1>you responded to a question in an interview about a

300
00:18:42.359 --> 00:18:45.640
<v Speaker 1>purported list of Epstein's clients by saying it's sitting on

301
00:18:45.640 --> 00:18:48.559
<v Speaker 1>my desk right now. Is that an accurate characterization of

302
00:18:48.599 --> 00:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>your statements during that interview, Bondi, if you listened to

303
00:18:52.240 --> 00:18:55.279
<v Speaker 1>the entire interview, I was referring to the file, and

304
00:18:55.359 --> 00:18:57.519
<v Speaker 1>I also included I don't have a copy of the

305
00:18:57.559 --> 00:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>transcript of that interview, but I kept going in said

306
00:19:00.480 --> 00:19:03.319
<v Speaker 1>the question, was I believe a list of clients? And

307
00:19:03.400 --> 00:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I said, it's sitting on my desk to review, along

308
00:19:05.920 --> 00:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>with JFK files MLK files. I wasn't I meant the

309
00:19:10.480 --> 00:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>files to review. I had not reviewed them at the time,

310
00:19:13.400 --> 00:19:17.279
<v Speaker 1>and I made that clear. Emmer. And I'm assuming you

311
00:19:17.400 --> 00:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>did ultimately review those files, is that right, BONDI? Yeah,

312
00:19:21.759 --> 00:19:25.839
<v Speaker 1>along with multiple attorneys in my office. Emmer And were

313
00:19:25.880 --> 00:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>those files the ones that you referred to previously that

314
00:19:28.519 --> 00:19:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the FBI produced to the DOJ upon assuming office? Answer? Yes, question,

315
00:19:34.400 --> 00:19:37.759
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Bondi, And I think you clarified something for me.

316
00:19:38.279 --> 00:19:40.519
<v Speaker 1>It was within two weeks of assuming office that I

317
00:19:40.559 --> 00:19:43.799
<v Speaker 1>received those so really within just a week or more,

318
00:19:43.960 --> 00:19:48.279
<v Speaker 1>I had requested all the Epstein documents. Question and during

319
00:19:48.359 --> 00:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>this period, upon the assuming office, you were interested in

320
00:19:51.039 --> 00:19:56.319
<v Speaker 1>whether or not there was a client list of Epstein Bondy, Yes, Emmer,

321
00:19:56.480 --> 00:19:58.839
<v Speaker 1>and you directed the department to review whether there was

322
00:19:58.880 --> 00:20:03.319
<v Speaker 1>a client list bond question by Emmer. And those documents

323
00:20:03.359 --> 00:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that you referred to that were sitting on your desk

324
00:20:06.039 --> 00:20:10.559
<v Speaker 1>were those ultimately produced publicly? Bondi, yes, Emmer. A week later,

325
00:20:10.599 --> 00:20:13.519
<v Speaker 1>on February twenty seventh, twenty twenty five, a group of

326
00:20:13.559 --> 00:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>select individuals left the White House holding white binders that

327
00:20:17.039 --> 00:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>contained the DOJ seal and were labeled the Epstein Files

328
00:20:20.440 --> 00:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Phase one. Do you recall this occurring, Bondi, yeah, and

329
00:20:24.720 --> 00:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that would include the approximately I'm saying approximate three hundred pages,

330
00:20:29.119 --> 00:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and I believe that included flight logs and other things.

331
00:20:31.799 --> 00:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>But those were the initial documents that we received. Emmer.

332
00:20:35.920 --> 00:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Were you involved in providing these documents to these individuals?

333
00:20:39.720 --> 00:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Bondi yes, question and ultimately, whose decision was it to

334
00:20:44.480 --> 00:20:48.559
<v Speaker 1>release the documents? Bondy Ultimately mine to release as much

335
00:20:48.599 --> 00:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>as we could while protecting victim's identities. Emmer. How were

336
00:20:52.759 --> 00:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the recipients of this Phase one release selected? Answer? We

337
00:20:56.680 --> 00:20:58.599
<v Speaker 1>were seeing them that day, they were at the White

338
00:20:58.599 --> 00:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>House and we handed them the bar and then it

339
00:21:01.240 --> 00:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>was released to the general public as well. Emmer. Were

340
00:21:05.240 --> 00:21:08.319
<v Speaker 1>these recipients of the Phase one release also provided an

341
00:21:08.359 --> 00:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to review the documents at DOJ headquarters. Bondy, I

342
00:21:12.920 --> 00:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>don't believe so, Emmer. So the label Epstein Files Phase

343
00:21:16.480 --> 00:21:18.599
<v Speaker 1>one at that point, was it presumed that there would

344
00:21:18.599 --> 00:21:21.640
<v Speaker 1>be a Phase two? Answer? Yeah, because I didn't believe

345
00:21:21.680 --> 00:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>that there were only three hundred approximately pages of Epstein documents.

346
00:21:25.720 --> 00:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>And I had sent the FBI a letter demanding everything

347
00:21:28.400 --> 00:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>they had, and that meant around this country on Epstein

348
00:21:32.000 --> 00:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and that was all we received, Emmer. And to be clear,

349
00:21:35.559 --> 00:21:37.759
<v Speaker 1>was there any other release of documents prior to this

350
00:21:37.759 --> 00:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Committee's investigation of the Epstein Files Transparency Act? Answer? Yes,

351
00:21:42.519 --> 00:21:46.920
<v Speaker 1>multiple ones, multiple ones, Emmer. At this time, I'd like

352
00:21:46.960 --> 00:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to introduce what will be marked as majority Exhibit number one,

353
00:21:52.000 --> 00:21:54.839
<v Speaker 1>and I'll give you a moment to review. Attorney General Bondi,

354
00:21:55.000 --> 00:21:58.519
<v Speaker 1>do you recognize this letter, Bondi? Yes, this is the

355
00:21:58.599 --> 00:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>letter that I referred to earlier dated February twenty seventh,

356
00:22:01.880 --> 00:22:05.559
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five, that I sent a Director Patel and

357
00:22:05.599 --> 00:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to clarify, I had said that we released approximately three

358
00:22:08.799 --> 00:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred maybe earlier documents, there were about two hundred pages.

359
00:22:12.640 --> 00:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>According to the letter that I sent them. Emmer. So,

360
00:22:16.079 --> 00:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in the letter, you claim that you learn from a

361
00:22:17.960 --> 00:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>source that the FBI Field office in New York was

362
00:22:20.759 --> 00:22:24.680
<v Speaker 1>withholding thousands of pages of Epstein documents, despite the FBI's

363
00:22:24.720 --> 00:22:28.160
<v Speaker 1>assurances that all relevant documents had been delivered to the

364
00:22:28.200 --> 00:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice already. In this letter, you say that

365
00:22:31.960 --> 00:22:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you only received about two hundred pages and requested an

366
00:22:34.880 --> 00:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>investigation into the document shortfall. Is that an accurate summary

367
00:22:39.400 --> 00:22:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of what occurred? Answer? Yes, Emmer. Why do you think

368
00:22:43.920 --> 00:22:48.279
<v Speaker 1>that this field office was withholding documents? BONDI? I asked

369
00:22:48.319 --> 00:22:52.519
<v Speaker 1>Ptel to look into that. Emmer. Who told or who

370
00:22:52.559 --> 00:22:55.039
<v Speaker 1>told you or brought these concerns to you that they

371
00:22:55.079 --> 00:22:58.759
<v Speaker 1>may be withholding documents, Bondy. I believe it was one

372
00:22:58.759 --> 00:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of the attorneys in my office who said. I believe

373
00:23:01.200 --> 00:23:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it was a career prosecutor who said, I think there

374
00:23:03.640 --> 00:23:06.079
<v Speaker 1>are more documents and they're in New York. I don't

375
00:23:06.079 --> 00:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>believe it was an FBI agent. And then that's when

376
00:23:09.039 --> 00:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I contacted Director Patel, who by that time had assumed office. Emmer.

377
00:23:14.799 --> 00:23:17.279
<v Speaker 1>You also stated in the letter that the FBI failed

378
00:23:17.279 --> 00:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to disclose the existence of these documents after your repeated

379
00:23:20.960 --> 00:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>requests to turn over all documents. Is that correct, Bondi?

380
00:23:25.119 --> 00:23:27.799
<v Speaker 1>That is correct, and I said by eight am tomorrow,

381
00:23:27.920 --> 00:23:30.799
<v Speaker 1>the FBI will deliver the full and complete Epstein files

382
00:23:30.839 --> 00:23:35.519
<v Speaker 1>to my office, including all records, documents, audio and video recordings,

383
00:23:35.759 --> 00:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and materials related to Jeffrey Epstein and his clients, regardless

384
00:23:39.720 --> 00:23:42.559
<v Speaker 1>of how such information was obtained. There will be no

385
00:23:42.640 --> 00:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>withholdings or limitations to my or your access. The Department

386
00:23:47.680 --> 00:23:51.039
<v Speaker 1>of Justice will ensure that any public disclosure of these

387
00:23:51.079 --> 00:23:53.599
<v Speaker 1>files will be done in a manner to protect the

388
00:23:53.599 --> 00:23:56.519
<v Speaker 1>privacy of victims and in accordance with the law, as

389
00:23:56.519 --> 00:23:59.559
<v Speaker 1>I've done my entire career as a prosecutor. And the

390
00:23:59.640 --> 00:24:04.359
<v Speaker 1>letter continues, question and you already mentioned that you discussed

391
00:24:04.599 --> 00:24:07.319
<v Speaker 1>this with Director Patel. Did you also discuss it with

392
00:24:07.480 --> 00:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Deputy Director of Bongino? Answer? I don't know if Deputy

393
00:24:11.240 --> 00:24:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Director of Bongino had assumed his office at that point.

394
00:24:15.359 --> 00:24:18.599
<v Speaker 1>Emmer and pursue into your letter. Did Director Ptel initiate

395
00:24:18.640 --> 00:24:24.640
<v Speaker 1>an investigation into that field office? Bondi, I believe he did. Emmer.

396
00:24:24.799 --> 00:24:28.559
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what the results of that investigation were? Bondi,

397
00:24:28.640 --> 00:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't recall. Emmer given this letter, What other steps

398
00:24:32.640 --> 00:24:35.839
<v Speaker 1>did you take to ensure the FBI turned over any

399
00:24:35.920 --> 00:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>end all of the remaining withheld documents? Bondi. I relied

400
00:24:40.440 --> 00:24:47.640
<v Speaker 1>on Patel and Deputy Attorney General Blanche. Question by Emmer,

401
00:24:47.799 --> 00:24:50.279
<v Speaker 1>so you yourself did not ever confirm that the FBI

402
00:24:50.640 --> 00:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>turned over all relevant documents following this incident. Answer by Bondi,

403
00:24:55.920 --> 00:24:59.279
<v Speaker 1>you would have to ask Director Patel. Question at this time,

404
00:24:59.319 --> 00:25:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I would like to what will be marked as majority

405
00:25:02.200 --> 00:25:07.920
<v Speaker 1>exhibit number two. Question Emmer. Attorney General Bondi, do you

406
00:25:07.960 --> 00:25:12.279
<v Speaker 1>recognize the statement? Answer by Bondi, yes. Question what role

407
00:25:12.319 --> 00:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>did you have in issuing the statement? Bondy, this was

408
00:25:16.680 --> 00:25:18.839
<v Speaker 1>I did not have a role in issuing the statement.

409
00:25:19.119 --> 00:25:22.279
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was done by Deputy Attorney General Blanche

410
00:25:22.359 --> 00:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>in conjunction with the FBI. I believe. Question and for

411
00:25:26.519 --> 00:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the record, this is the July seventh, twenty twenty five

412
00:25:29.759 --> 00:25:33.599
<v Speaker 1>DOJ an FBI joint statement. The statement said that there

413
00:25:33.640 --> 00:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>was no evidence that Epstein kept a client list of

414
00:25:36.079 --> 00:25:40.079
<v Speaker 1>associates whom he blackmailed or conspired with to victimize dozens

415
00:25:40.119 --> 00:25:43.119
<v Speaker 1>of women. Do you know which documents the DOJ and

416
00:25:43.279 --> 00:25:47.759
<v Speaker 1>FBI relied on in issuing the statement, BONDI, I do not.

417
00:25:48.039 --> 00:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>You'd have to ask Deputy Attorney General now Acting Attorney

418
00:25:50.960 --> 00:25:55.640
<v Speaker 1>General Blanche and director of Bttel Emmer, prior to this

419
00:25:55.680 --> 00:25:58.559
<v Speaker 1>statement being issued, where you briefed on the reviews finding

420
00:25:59.119 --> 00:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that informed the state? BONDI, yes. Question what were you told, Bondy,

421
00:26:03.920 --> 00:26:07.079
<v Speaker 1>I don't recall other than what's in the letter Emmer.

422
00:26:07.319 --> 00:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>As far as conclusions of the letter itself, did you

423
00:26:09.720 --> 00:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>have concerns Bondy at the time, No, We relied on

424
00:26:13.279 --> 00:26:18.079
<v Speaker 1>the documents that the FBI and DJ received. Question and

425
00:26:18.160 --> 00:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the letter says that there was DJ was not able

426
00:26:21.240 --> 00:26:24.319
<v Speaker 1>to locate a client list. Did DOJ compile a list

427
00:26:24.319 --> 00:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>of individuals as far as its review that may have

428
00:26:27.400 --> 00:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>been associated with Epstein and Maxwell? Answer? Not, to my knowledge,

429
00:26:31.640 --> 00:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>they didn't compile a client list to my knowledge. Question

430
00:26:35.519 --> 00:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>by Emmer. So for the record, is it your testimony

431
00:26:38.279 --> 00:26:41.400
<v Speaker 1>today that the Department of Justice never had a list

432
00:26:41.400 --> 00:26:46.839
<v Speaker 1>of Epstein's clients or associates in its possession? BONDI not,

433
00:26:46.960 --> 00:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to my knowledge. All right, folks, we're gonna wrap up

434
00:26:49.440 --> 00:26:51.799
<v Speaker 1>right here, and in the next episode dealing with the topic,

435
00:26:51.839 --> 00:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna pick up where we left off. All the

436
00:26:54.480 --> 00:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>information that goes with this episode can be found in

437
00:26:57.440 --> 00:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the description box. What's up, everyone, and welcome to another

438
00:27:00.519 --> 00:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>episode of the Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're diving

439
00:27:05.000 --> 00:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>right back in to the transcript from Pam Bondi and

440
00:27:08.960 --> 00:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>her visit to Congress. Question Emmer. The joint statement also

441
00:27:13.960 --> 00:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>said neither the DOJ nor the FBI uncovered evidence that

442
00:27:17.720 --> 00:27:22.839
<v Speaker 1>could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties. What process

443
00:27:22.880 --> 00:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>did the Department of Justice undergo to determine there was

444
00:27:25.960 --> 00:27:30.559
<v Speaker 1>no evidence to investigate any third parties? Bondi. I believe

445
00:27:30.599 --> 00:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the FBI thoroughly reviewed all the documents in its possession

446
00:27:34.200 --> 00:27:39.319
<v Speaker 1>to make that determination. They are the investigative agency. Emmer.

447
00:27:39.519 --> 00:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh huh. During the time when this statement was issued,

448
00:27:42.200 --> 00:27:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you've mentioned that Blanche was heavily involved. Were you ever

449
00:27:45.200 --> 00:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>briefed on individuals of concern related to Epstein or Maxwell? Bondi.

450
00:27:51.039 --> 00:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't recall other than they were scouring through the documents,

451
00:27:54.440 --> 00:27:57.759
<v Speaker 1>and I believe there were multiple videos as well. Question,

452
00:27:58.119 --> 00:28:00.519
<v Speaker 1>as far as this initial review, did the Department of

453
00:28:00.640 --> 00:28:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Justice conduct any interview or meeting with any individual in

454
00:28:04.359 --> 00:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>its efforts to determine whether further investigation was necessary. Bondy.

455
00:28:09.880 --> 00:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Can you repeat that, Emmer? As part of its review

456
00:28:13.000 --> 00:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that informed the July seventh joint statement, did the Department

457
00:28:16.680 --> 00:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of Justice interview any individuals outside the DOJ to inform

458
00:28:20.680 --> 00:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>its conclusion? Bondi. I believe the FBI did, but that's

459
00:28:25.000 --> 00:28:29.279
<v Speaker 1>a question for Director Bettel Emmer. On July twenty fourth

460
00:28:29.319 --> 00:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and July twenty fifth of twenty twenty five, Deputy Attorney

461
00:28:32.880 --> 00:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>General Todd Blanche interviewed Glenn Maxwell, and the DOJ released

462
00:28:37.000 --> 00:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the transcript a month later. Attorney General BONDI, why did

463
00:28:40.920 --> 00:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice conduct this interview? Bondi? I believe

464
00:28:45.279 --> 00:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Deputy Attorney General now Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has

465
00:28:48.880 --> 00:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>set on several occasions at Epstein by that time was

466
00:28:51.759 --> 00:28:54.519
<v Speaker 1>dead and no one had taken had made an effort

467
00:28:54.559 --> 00:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to interview Glenn Maxwell to see if she had evidence

468
00:28:57.279 --> 00:29:00.279
<v Speaker 1>of co conspirators and other crimes, and that that's why

469
00:29:00.400 --> 00:29:05.799
<v Speaker 1>interviewed her. Question are you aware of whether Maxwell reached

470
00:29:05.839 --> 00:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>out to the Department of Justice to request this interview?

471
00:29:09.720 --> 00:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Answer by BONDI, I don't recall how it was initiated, Emmer,

472
00:29:14.880 --> 00:29:16.759
<v Speaker 1>So would it be safe to assume that you had

473
00:29:16.839 --> 00:29:21.319
<v Speaker 1>no role in the determination that then Deputy Attorney General

474
00:29:21.319 --> 00:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Todd Blanche would perform the interview. Answer, Oh, I knew

475
00:29:24.480 --> 00:29:27.279
<v Speaker 1>that Todd was going to interview or yes, I believe.

476
00:29:27.480 --> 00:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe who initiated it if she reached out

477
00:29:30.440 --> 00:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to us, I believe. I don't want to speculate, but

478
00:29:32.960 --> 00:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe that Deputy Attorney General Blanche at the time

479
00:29:35.759 --> 00:29:38.359
<v Speaker 1>reached out to them because there was someone still living

480
00:29:38.400 --> 00:29:42.039
<v Speaker 1>in prison who had potential information about other co conspirators

481
00:29:42.200 --> 00:29:46.519
<v Speaker 1>and crimes. Question by Emmer. Were there any concerns at

482
00:29:46.519 --> 00:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the DOJ about conducting the interview with clann Maxwell Bondie. No,

483
00:29:51.319 --> 00:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>not to my knowledge, Emmer. And based on Maxwell's testimony

484
00:29:55.240 --> 00:29:58.079
<v Speaker 1>to Todd Blanche, did the Department of Justice take any

485
00:29:58.119 --> 00:30:02.599
<v Speaker 1>subsequent action that were informed by the testimony? Answer by

486
00:30:02.640 --> 00:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>BONDI I don't believe. So. Now, mister Grant jumps in

487
00:30:06.480 --> 00:30:08.799
<v Speaker 1>and do you know why or how it became that

488
00:30:08.839 --> 00:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the Deputy Attorney General Blanche would be the one to

489
00:30:11.480 --> 00:30:15.319
<v Speaker 1>take the interview of miss Maxwell Bondie. He was leading

490
00:30:15.359 --> 00:30:18.119
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein matter and the release of everything from the beginning.

491
00:30:18.480 --> 00:30:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Deputy Attorney General now acting you as Attorney Blanche was Emmer,

492
00:30:24.359 --> 00:30:27.599
<v Speaker 1>Maxwell's attorney stated publicly that Maxwell had provided the names

493
00:30:27.720 --> 00:30:30.559
<v Speaker 1>of one hundred different people connected to Jeffrey Epstein in

494
00:30:30.640 --> 00:30:33.519
<v Speaker 1>the course of a two day interview. Did the Department

495
00:30:33.559 --> 00:30:37.839
<v Speaker 1>of Justice investigate any of the individuals named in Maxwell's testimony?

496
00:30:39.240 --> 00:30:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Bondi and I believe that entire transcript has been released

497
00:30:42.240 --> 00:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and the FBI would have looked into that. That was

498
00:30:44.920 --> 00:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the purpose of taking the statement. Question as far as

499
00:30:48.720 --> 00:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the transcript itself and what has been released publicly, how

500
00:30:52.720 --> 00:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>did the Department of Justice determine which individuals would be

501
00:30:55.720 --> 00:31:00.799
<v Speaker 1>redacted from the transcript? Bondy, Deputy Attorney General Blanche made

502
00:31:00.839 --> 00:31:04.319
<v Speaker 1>that determination based on the law and what privileges would apply.

503
00:31:05.680 --> 00:31:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Question do you know what type of individual names were

504
00:31:08.319 --> 00:31:12.319
<v Speaker 1>redacted in the Maxwell transcript? Answer by Bondie, I don't recall.

505
00:31:12.839 --> 00:31:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Question are you aware of whether there were any redaction

506
00:31:15.960 --> 00:31:20.559
<v Speaker 1>errors in the transcript? Answer? I don't recall. Ultimately, of course,

507
00:31:20.599 --> 00:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>there were millions of documents released, so I don't recall

508
00:31:23.519 --> 00:31:26.839
<v Speaker 1>regarding the transcript, but if there were, I do believe

509
00:31:26.839 --> 00:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Deputy Attorney General Blanche now acting ag Blanche did everything

510
00:31:31.200 --> 00:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to be sure we had complete transparency under the law. Question.

511
00:31:36.680 --> 00:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Following the interview, Glenn Maxwell was moved by the Bureau

512
00:31:39.680 --> 00:31:43.079
<v Speaker 1>of Prisons from a maximum security prison in Florida to

513
00:31:43.119 --> 00:31:46.599
<v Speaker 1>a low security federal prison in Texas on August first,

514
00:31:46.720 --> 00:31:51.599
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five. Why was that, Bondie. I read about

515
00:31:51.599 --> 00:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that in the newspaper or online after it happened. I

516
00:31:54.440 --> 00:31:57.079
<v Speaker 1>had nothing to do with that. I don't want to speculate,

517
00:31:57.240 --> 00:31:59.599
<v Speaker 1>but I believe it was for security reasons. You'd have

518
00:31:59.680 --> 00:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to ask the Bureau of Prisons that question. Question. Would

519
00:32:04.480 --> 00:32:08.799
<v Speaker 1>then Deputy Attorney General Blanche know the answer to that question? Bondy,

520
00:32:08.960 --> 00:32:12.359
<v Speaker 1>he may, and I'm not sure if he's addressed it publicly. Probably,

521
00:32:12.640 --> 00:32:15.559
<v Speaker 1>but transferring a prisoner is the decision of the Bureau

522
00:32:15.640 --> 00:32:19.519
<v Speaker 1>of Prisons. Question to be clear, and to your knowledge,

523
00:32:20.039 --> 00:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>do you know if her transfer had anything to do

524
00:32:22.519 --> 00:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>with her participating in the interview with Todd Blanche Bondy,

525
00:32:26.200 --> 00:32:28.319
<v Speaker 1>I have no knowledge of that. Again, I found out

526
00:32:28.359 --> 00:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>about it after the transfer, when it became public. Question,

527
00:32:31.640 --> 00:32:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General of BONDI, do you believe that Glenn Maxwell

528
00:32:34.759 --> 00:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>should receive a pardon? Bondy? No, I believe that she

529
00:32:38.720 --> 00:32:42.039
<v Speaker 1>should die in prison. Question why? Answer? She was a

530
00:32:42.079 --> 00:32:46.039
<v Speaker 1>monster just like Jeffrey Epstein. She recruited these young women

531
00:32:46.079 --> 00:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to a life of prostitution and abuse. And I often

532
00:32:49.480 --> 00:32:51.839
<v Speaker 1>think that the women that do that are just as bad,

533
00:32:52.039 --> 00:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>if not worse, than the men, because she participated in it.

534
00:32:56.160 --> 00:33:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Mister Grant's asking questions again. On August twenty second, twenty

535
00:33:00.319 --> 00:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, this committee issued a subpoena to the Department

536
00:33:03.880 --> 00:33:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of Justice for documents pertaining to the Epstein matter. The

537
00:33:07.519 --> 00:33:13.079
<v Speaker 1>DOJ subsequently produced approximately thirty three thousand documents to the committee.

538
00:33:13.200 --> 00:33:16.759
<v Speaker 1>In this production, the DOJ indicated that multiple responsive records

539
00:33:16.920 --> 00:33:21.279
<v Speaker 1>must also be withheld or redacted as required by applicable law,

540
00:33:21.799 --> 00:33:27.119
<v Speaker 1>including certain grand jury material and documents containing personally identifiable information.

541
00:33:28.000 --> 00:33:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Are you aware, Attorney General Bondi, how the DOJ initially

542
00:33:31.759 --> 00:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>gathered or collected necessary documents under this committee subpoena? Answer? No,

543
00:33:37.319 --> 00:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>And that task I believe was thirty three thousand pages

544
00:33:40.599 --> 00:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>was delegated to Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward. He handled

545
00:33:45.200 --> 00:33:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that bachel releases excuse me question, and so it would

546
00:33:48.720 --> 00:33:51.039
<v Speaker 1>be mister Woodward that would know more about the process

547
00:33:51.279 --> 00:33:56.119
<v Speaker 1>to determine which documents fell under that subpoena? Answer yes,

548
00:33:56.559 --> 00:34:01.519
<v Speaker 1>Question were you ever briefed on the documents underneath that subpoena? Answer?

549
00:34:01.599 --> 00:34:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Maybe briefly after they were released. Our goal was to

550
00:34:04.839 --> 00:34:07.599
<v Speaker 1>get as much out publicly that was legally permissible as

551
00:34:07.680 --> 00:34:12.119
<v Speaker 1>fast as we could. Question And would that redaction process

552
00:34:12.119 --> 00:34:14.599
<v Speaker 1>for those documents be similar to what the Department of

553
00:34:14.800 --> 00:34:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Justice was already doing as far as making sure no

554
00:34:17.880 --> 00:34:21.079
<v Speaker 1>personal information was getting out there because it was required

555
00:34:21.119 --> 00:34:24.639
<v Speaker 1>by law. Answer yeah, and I believe that Stanley Woodward

556
00:34:24.719 --> 00:34:28.679
<v Speaker 1>was the one again who supervised that release. Question and

557
00:34:28.800 --> 00:34:31.199
<v Speaker 1>in this matter, who at the Department of Justice would

558
00:34:31.239 --> 00:34:34.760
<v Speaker 1>have been actually doing those redactions? Staff attorneys, other attorneys

559
00:34:34.760 --> 00:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>at Main Justice, someone else? Answer? I believe it was attorneys,

560
00:34:38.679 --> 00:34:42.159
<v Speaker 1>multiple attorneys at the Department of Justice, even some again

561
00:34:42.400 --> 00:34:46.800
<v Speaker 1>from the National Security Division. And again, ultimately attorneys from

562
00:34:46.800 --> 00:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>all over the country were pulled in to help once

563
00:34:49.039 --> 00:34:52.559
<v Speaker 1>we received the millions of pages of documents. But initially

564
00:34:52.760 --> 00:34:55.320
<v Speaker 1>we did have attorneys from within the Department of Justice

565
00:34:55.400 --> 00:35:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and the FBI, I believe working on those redactions. And

566
00:35:00.440 --> 00:35:02.800
<v Speaker 1>are you aware of attorneys at the Department of Justice

567
00:35:03.039 --> 00:35:05.480
<v Speaker 1>having to undergo any type of training as far as

568
00:35:05.480 --> 00:35:09.039
<v Speaker 1>redactions go. Answer. I believe they did, and that would

569
00:35:09.079 --> 00:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>have been supervised by Todd Blanche. Question was there any

570
00:35:13.000 --> 00:35:16.639
<v Speaker 1>criteria for which attorneys get selected to do redactions that

571
00:35:16.719 --> 00:35:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you're aware of? Bondie? I recall we used attorneys from

572
00:35:21.320 --> 00:35:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the National Security Division as much as we could because

573
00:35:24.440 --> 00:35:27.079
<v Speaker 1>they have top security clearance and the goal was to

574
00:35:27.079 --> 00:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>protect the victim's identities. Question and are you aware of

575
00:35:31.960 --> 00:35:35.880
<v Speaker 1>why the DOJ only produced thirty three thousand documents pursuant

576
00:35:36.000 --> 00:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to the committee subpoena. Answer? I believe because that was

577
00:35:39.920 --> 00:35:42.079
<v Speaker 1>all they had at the time, and we would have

578
00:35:42.119 --> 00:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>had to ask Associate Attorney General Stanley wood Word that question. Now,

579
00:35:46.960 --> 00:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>mister Emmer is asking questions once again. Let's talk about

580
00:35:50.880 --> 00:35:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein Files Transparency Act, And for the record, the

581
00:35:53.880 --> 00:35:57.719
<v Speaker 1>EFTA was signed into law November nineteenth of twenty twenty five,

582
00:35:58.159 --> 00:36:01.599
<v Speaker 1>requiring you, the Attorney General at the time, to release

583
00:36:01.639 --> 00:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>all documents related to the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein within

584
00:36:05.440 --> 00:36:09.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty days and making them publicly available in a searchable format.

585
00:36:09.880 --> 00:36:12.599
<v Speaker 1>What was your role in carrying out the Epstein Files

586
00:36:12.760 --> 00:36:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Transparency Act? Answer? Todd Blanche supervised that entire process. To

587
00:36:18.320 --> 00:36:20.599
<v Speaker 1>back up for a minute, though, the Office did ask

588
00:36:20.639 --> 00:36:24.840
<v Speaker 1>for those files prior to the Transparency Act be unsealed

589
00:36:24.840 --> 00:36:28.159
<v Speaker 1>by the courts in multiple jurisdictions. I believe it was

590
00:36:28.280 --> 00:36:32.960
<v Speaker 1>SDFL and SDNY, and those requests were denied and it

591
00:36:33.000 --> 00:36:35.880
<v Speaker 1>was not until the Transparency Act that we were able

592
00:36:35.920 --> 00:36:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to receive those documents. Questions, So there were existing efforts

593
00:36:39.880 --> 00:36:43.639
<v Speaker 1>to release documents prior to the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

594
00:36:44.079 --> 00:36:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Answer yes, question, So what was your response to the

595
00:36:47.800 --> 00:36:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Epstein Files Transparency Act being passed? Bondie. We were able

596
00:36:52.719 --> 00:36:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to receive many more documents based on the Act. We

597
00:36:55.280 --> 00:36:57.719
<v Speaker 1>were able to unseal the grand jury. We made a

598
00:36:57.760 --> 00:37:01.079
<v Speaker 1>motion to unseal the grand jury documents and Epstein and Maxwell,

599
00:37:01.559 --> 00:37:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and that also included the Epstein when he died excuse me.

600
00:37:05.320 --> 00:37:08.360
<v Speaker 1>That also included when Epstein died in prison. It included

601
00:37:08.400 --> 00:37:11.719
<v Speaker 1>I believe a prison guard case somewhere, Epstein cases and

602
00:37:11.800 --> 00:37:16.039
<v Speaker 1>both jurisdictions and Maxwell's cases. Question, and you said the

603
00:37:16.079 --> 00:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>effort was directed by Todd Blanche. Is that correct? Answer? Yes?

604
00:37:20.280 --> 00:37:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Question How frequently did you meet with Todd Blanche after

605
00:37:23.719 --> 00:37:28.199
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein Files Transparency Act was passed? Answer. I spoke

606
00:37:28.239 --> 00:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>with Deputy Attorney General practically every day about countless issues

607
00:37:32.280 --> 00:37:35.320
<v Speaker 1>around not only the country but the world that we

608
00:37:35.320 --> 00:37:38.239
<v Speaker 1>were dealing with. As to details on it, I don't know.

609
00:37:38.440 --> 00:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't recall how often question in relation to EFTA

610
00:37:42.239 --> 00:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>and the Department's obligation they're under. What concern was or

611
00:37:45.760 --> 00:37:50.039
<v Speaker 1>did Todd Blanche express concerns as far as releasing documents?

612
00:37:50.360 --> 00:37:54.320
<v Speaker 1>What was he saying? And to this Harme Dillon jumps in,

613
00:37:54.679 --> 00:37:56.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to point out that you can answer

614
00:37:56.840 --> 00:38:01.199
<v Speaker 1>that to the extent that it doesn't reveal protective communication. Bondie,

615
00:38:01.400 --> 00:38:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I can say I believe everyone was concerned about protecting

616
00:38:04.360 --> 00:38:07.639
<v Speaker 1>victim identity given the six million pages of documents that

617
00:38:07.800 --> 00:38:10.719
<v Speaker 1>was received and only a thirty day timeline to comply

618
00:38:11.079 --> 00:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>with the process. Mister Emmer and we're going to talk

619
00:38:15.000 --> 00:38:17.840
<v Speaker 1>more in detail about what was produced, But to start,

620
00:38:18.119 --> 00:38:21.320
<v Speaker 1>how did Department of Justice initially gather or collect necessary

621
00:38:21.360 --> 00:38:27.320
<v Speaker 1>documents or material that complied with the Epstein File Transparency Act. Bondie,

622
00:38:27.320 --> 00:38:30.159
<v Speaker 1>can you repeat that question? How did the Department of

623
00:38:30.280 --> 00:38:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Justice initially gather or collect the necessary documents or material

624
00:38:34.159 --> 00:38:38.239
<v Speaker 1>that complied with the Epstein File Transparency Act. Answer, Well,

625
00:38:38.360 --> 00:38:41.840
<v Speaker 1>as I stated earlier, the Department made motions to unsealed

626
00:38:41.840 --> 00:38:45.039
<v Speaker 1>things that were previously withheld from the US by the

627
00:38:45.079 --> 00:38:49.239
<v Speaker 1>courts and requested everything we possibly could, which is why

628
00:38:49.440 --> 00:38:52.079
<v Speaker 1>there was an over collection in documents as well as

629
00:38:52.119 --> 00:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>from the jurisdictions. And again that included the death of Epstein,

630
00:38:56.239 --> 00:39:00.079
<v Speaker 1>Glenn Maxwell's case, both of all of Epstein's cases in

631
00:39:00.119 --> 00:39:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the multiple jurisdictions. Question, to the best of your knowledge,

632
00:39:03.679 --> 00:39:07.079
<v Speaker 1>what was the process to determine which documents and material

633
00:39:07.159 --> 00:39:11.880
<v Speaker 1>fell under the Epstein File Transparency Act. Answer? I believe

634
00:39:11.880 --> 00:39:15.119
<v Speaker 1>we collected everything possible out there related to Epstein, which

635
00:39:15.199 --> 00:39:17.639
<v Speaker 1>is why there was such an over collection as well.

636
00:39:19.079 --> 00:39:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Question and again, then Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche was

637
00:39:23.000 --> 00:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>overseeing the efforts. Is that right? Answer? Yes, Todd Blanche

638
00:39:27.199 --> 00:39:30.840
<v Speaker 1>oversaw the entire investigation, and he has made multiple statements

639
00:39:31.000 --> 00:39:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and done multiple interviews regarding that. All right, folks, we're

640
00:39:34.800 --> 00:39:37.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna wrap up right here, and in the next episode,

641
00:39:37.320 --> 00:39:39.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna pick up where we left off. All the

642
00:39:39.960 --> 00:39:42.760
<v Speaker 1>information that goes with this episode can be found in

643
00:39:42.800 --> 00:39:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the description box. What's up, everyone, and welcome to another

644
00:39:45.760 --> 00:39:49.760
<v Speaker 1>episode of the Epstein chronicles. In this episode, we're going

645
00:39:49.800 --> 00:39:53.079
<v Speaker 1>to get right back to Pam Bondy and the transcript

646
00:39:53.119 --> 00:39:59.559
<v Speaker 1>from her meeting with Congress. Question, so let's talk about

647
00:39:59.599 --> 00:40:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that day timeline was a Department of Justice able to

648
00:40:02.800 --> 00:40:07.760
<v Speaker 1>produce all documents within the thirty days? Bondy, No, And

649
00:40:07.800 --> 00:40:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that is when I became more involved, because we had

650
00:40:10.519 --> 00:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>over five hundred attorneys I believe, working around the clock

651
00:40:14.000 --> 00:40:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to do the best we could in good faith to

652
00:40:16.440 --> 00:40:19.599
<v Speaker 1>release as many documents as we could within thirty days

653
00:40:19.800 --> 00:40:22.960
<v Speaker 1>while protecting the identity of the victims. And I do

654
00:40:23.079 --> 00:40:26.599
<v Speaker 1>recall very vividly that these lawyers were working over Christmas

655
00:40:26.719 --> 00:40:29.800
<v Speaker 1>New Year's holidays to get that done, some late into

656
00:40:29.840 --> 00:40:33.599
<v Speaker 1>the night, I mean one two am. Question. And you

657
00:40:33.639 --> 00:40:37.639
<v Speaker 1>mentioned five hundred attorneys, Bondy plus question, where did they

658
00:40:37.679 --> 00:40:42.119
<v Speaker 1>come from? Bondy? They came from our National Security Division.

659
00:40:42.400 --> 00:40:45.719
<v Speaker 1>They came from I believe SDNY, the Northern District of

660
00:40:45.719 --> 00:40:49.320
<v Speaker 1>New York and Florida. Todd Blanche recruited attorneys within our

661
00:40:49.360 --> 00:40:52.840
<v Speaker 1>office to come in and complete this herculean task of

662
00:40:52.880 --> 00:40:55.639
<v Speaker 1>millions of documents within thirty days, to the best that

663
00:40:55.679 --> 00:41:00.159
<v Speaker 1>we could to protect victims. Question. I would presume that

664
00:41:00.159 --> 00:41:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the five hundred attorneys had other roles and responsibilities that

665
00:41:03.800 --> 00:41:06.119
<v Speaker 1>they were to handle at the department during the period.

666
00:41:06.559 --> 00:41:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Answer they absolutely did. Yes. Question were their concerns about

667
00:41:10.360 --> 00:41:14.400
<v Speaker 1>diverting resources? Answer? Yes, And to clarify, some may have

668
00:41:14.440 --> 00:41:16.760
<v Speaker 1>taken this on full time, but I believe many of

669
00:41:16.800 --> 00:41:19.320
<v Speaker 1>them had other roles going on at the same time

670
00:41:19.320 --> 00:41:23.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. Emmer, we've had another member join us. Can

671
00:41:23.480 --> 00:41:30.760
<v Speaker 1>he please identify himself for the record, mister Kana, Rocana, California, seventeen. Emmer,

672
00:41:31.000 --> 00:41:33.239
<v Speaker 1>and I know that you've already mentioned how many documents

673
00:41:33.280 --> 00:41:36.519
<v Speaker 1>were produced, but again for the public. How many total

674
00:41:36.559 --> 00:41:39.599
<v Speaker 1>documents or materials did the Department of Justice produce to

675
00:41:39.639 --> 00:41:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the public pursuant to the Epstein File Transparency Act BONDI

676
00:41:44.480 --> 00:41:48.679
<v Speaker 1>approximately three million? Question? And there has been public statements.

677
00:41:48.679 --> 00:41:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I believe that then Deputy Attorney General Blanche had said

678
00:41:52.079 --> 00:41:55.880
<v Speaker 1>at one point there were six million total potentially responsive material.

679
00:41:56.239 --> 00:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that right, BONDI, He did, and he's clarified that

680
00:42:00.119 --> 00:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>multiple times, I believe, publicly indicating that a lot much

681
00:42:03.480 --> 00:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of it was duplicative because it was coming from two districts,

682
00:42:07.280 --> 00:42:09.920
<v Speaker 1>some was privileged, and also he stated that some of

683
00:42:09.920 --> 00:42:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the material had absolutely nothing to do with Epstein. Jeffrey Epstein,

684
00:42:13.760 --> 00:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it was over collection in an effort to ensure radical

685
00:42:17.039 --> 00:42:21.599
<v Speaker 1>transparency for the country questions. So, to be clear, there

686
00:42:21.639 --> 00:42:24.840
<v Speaker 1>has been a lot said in accusations that the Department

687
00:42:25.000 --> 00:42:29.039
<v Speaker 1>didn't produce everything. Attorney General BONDI, are there any documents

688
00:42:29.079 --> 00:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>remaining in possession of the Department of Justice that are

689
00:42:32.039 --> 00:42:37.039
<v Speaker 1>required to be released pursuant to the Epstein File Transparency Act? Answer?

690
00:42:37.239 --> 00:42:41.000
<v Speaker 1>To my knowledge, they've all been released, to my knowledge. Question,

691
00:42:41.239 --> 00:42:43.880
<v Speaker 1>why do people keep asking for the files to be released?

692
00:42:43.920 --> 00:42:48.360
<v Speaker 1>In answer, the unredacted versions are also available to members

693
00:42:48.360 --> 00:42:52.519
<v Speaker 1>of Congress, including duplicative material. So and I believe that's

694
00:42:52.519 --> 00:42:55.559
<v Speaker 1>still available, so people can so Congress can go and

695
00:42:55.599 --> 00:42:58.760
<v Speaker 1>see it for themselves. The six million pages versus why

696
00:42:58.800 --> 00:43:01.960
<v Speaker 1>three million was released and much of it was duplicative

697
00:43:02.280 --> 00:43:06.840
<v Speaker 1>or privileged or completely unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein. At this time,

698
00:43:06.920 --> 00:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I would like to introduce what will be marked as

699
00:43:09.079 --> 00:43:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Majority Exhibit number three. And this is a letter that

700
00:43:12.960 --> 00:43:15.480
<v Speaker 1>was sent from the Department of Justice to Senators and

701
00:43:15.559 --> 00:43:19.679
<v Speaker 1>members of Congress on January thirtieth. Mister Emmer, I would

702
00:43:19.679 --> 00:43:22.199
<v Speaker 1>also like to introduce what will be marked as majority

703
00:43:22.199 --> 00:43:25.280
<v Speaker 1>exhibit for This is also a letter that was sent

704
00:43:25.360 --> 00:43:31.039
<v Speaker 1>on February fourteenth of twenty twenty six. Emmer, and I'll

705
00:43:31.039 --> 00:43:33.880
<v Speaker 1>give you a moment to review. Attorney General BONDI, you've

706
00:43:33.880 --> 00:43:36.239
<v Speaker 1>had a chance to review the documents. These are the

707
00:43:36.280 --> 00:43:40.039
<v Speaker 1>notifications that you provided Congress pursuant to the Epstein File

708
00:43:40.119 --> 00:43:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Transparency Act. Answer yes, question and again you touched on

709
00:43:43.960 --> 00:43:47.519
<v Speaker 1>it previously. But there were certain categories of documents that

710
00:43:47.599 --> 00:43:51.119
<v Speaker 1>were not produced. Is that right? Answer? Yes? Question and

711
00:43:51.199 --> 00:43:55.840
<v Speaker 1>again you I believe one class was duplicative documents. And

712
00:43:55.920 --> 00:43:58.039
<v Speaker 1>for the record, I know that you've been an attorney

713
00:43:58.159 --> 00:44:01.719
<v Speaker 1>for many years. Can you just expels again what qualifies

714
00:44:02.079 --> 00:44:06.800
<v Speaker 1>as duplicative documents? Answer? Sure, the same document being released twice,

715
00:44:07.199 --> 00:44:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and that occurred, I believe because there were documents in

716
00:44:09.880 --> 00:44:13.719
<v Speaker 1>multiple districts within the country, specifically, I believe the Southern

717
00:44:13.760 --> 00:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>District of Florida and the Southern District of New York.

718
00:44:17.679 --> 00:44:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Question and understanding that then Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche

719
00:44:21.519 --> 00:44:24.360
<v Speaker 1>was overseeing the efforts, did he ever brief you on

720
00:44:24.440 --> 00:44:29.239
<v Speaker 1>how many documents were considered to be duplicative? Answered? Not specifically,

721
00:44:29.719 --> 00:44:32.440
<v Speaker 1>but I believe it was approximately three million. I believe.

722
00:44:32.719 --> 00:44:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh duplicative. No, I don't. I'm sorry, I don't recall

723
00:44:35.719 --> 00:44:40.400
<v Speaker 1>how many were duplicative? Question And there were certain documents

724
00:44:40.440 --> 00:44:44.239
<v Speaker 1>that were privileged? Answer? Yes, question can you elaborate more

725
00:44:44.400 --> 00:44:47.280
<v Speaker 1>on why those can't be produced? Answer? I can give

726
00:44:47.280 --> 00:44:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you an example, which would be a prosecution memo was privileged.

727
00:44:51.880 --> 00:44:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Question and who made that determination whether a document was

728
00:44:55.039 --> 00:44:59.360
<v Speaker 1>considered to be privileged? Answer Todd Blanche while following the law,

729
00:45:00.440 --> 00:45:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and Todd Blanche never approached you about any specific document

730
00:45:03.920 --> 00:45:08.679
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to privilege, Bondy. Probably, I don't recall specifically,

731
00:45:09.079 --> 00:45:11.559
<v Speaker 1>but we probably talked about it. I talked to him

732
00:45:11.559 --> 00:45:16.039
<v Speaker 1>every day about multiple issues around the country and the world. Question,

733
00:45:16.280 --> 00:45:18.159
<v Speaker 1>and I know you touched on this previously. But the

734
00:45:18.199 --> 00:45:21.599
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice, according to the letters, said that they

735
00:45:21.639 --> 00:45:24.159
<v Speaker 1>were certain files that were being withheld that are not

736
00:45:24.320 --> 00:45:27.400
<v Speaker 1>part of the case file for Epstein or Maxwell and

737
00:45:27.440 --> 00:45:31.519
<v Speaker 1>we're completely unrelated to the case. Is that right? Answer? Yes,

738
00:45:31.920 --> 00:45:34.639
<v Speaker 1>question can you give us an example of what that

739
00:45:34.679 --> 00:45:39.800
<v Speaker 1>would be? What would have been captured by that? Answer Bondie.

740
00:45:39.880 --> 00:45:42.519
<v Speaker 1>I believe an example that Todd Blanche used. Was there

741
00:45:42.559 --> 00:45:45.440
<v Speaker 1>was someone else in South Florida with the name of Epstein,

742
00:45:45.719 --> 00:45:49.079
<v Speaker 1>an entire case that had nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein.

743
00:45:49.480 --> 00:45:52.199
<v Speaker 1>That would be an example of it. Question and for

744
00:45:52.239 --> 00:45:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the record, recognizing that you had to conduct a search

745
00:45:55.519 --> 00:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>and have produced millions of documents, if those documents were

746
00:45:58.719 --> 00:46:01.800
<v Speaker 1>determined to have nothing to do with Epstein or Maxwell case,

747
00:46:02.320 --> 00:46:05.760
<v Speaker 1>why were they originally included in this search that the

748
00:46:05.760 --> 00:46:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice conducted. Answer? We wanted to have radical

749
00:46:09.639 --> 00:46:13.039
<v Speaker 1>transparency and find everything that was related to Jeffrey Epstein,

750
00:46:13.440 --> 00:46:17.559
<v Speaker 1>and that's why the search was overboard. Question thank you.

751
00:46:17.960 --> 00:46:19.679
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about the redactions that were in

752
00:46:19.719 --> 00:46:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the files. What was the Department of Justice redaction process

753
00:46:23.480 --> 00:46:28.000
<v Speaker 1>for documents released under the Epstein File Transparency Act. Answer?

754
00:46:28.280 --> 00:46:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe that it listed is one of Todd Blanche's memos,

755
00:46:31.719 --> 00:46:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and he was in charge of the process and the

756
00:46:33.880 --> 00:46:37.840
<v Speaker 1>entire release of the Epstein files. Question and during the

757
00:46:37.880 --> 00:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>process when you were preparing documents to be produced, were

758
00:46:41.239 --> 00:46:45.199
<v Speaker 1>their concerns about what should or should not be redacted? Answer?

759
00:46:45.199 --> 00:46:49.639
<v Speaker 1>I believe so. Question did you have concerns BONDI yeah,

760
00:46:49.840 --> 00:46:53.119
<v Speaker 1>I have grave concerns about victim's names being released because

761
00:46:53.119 --> 00:46:55.599
<v Speaker 1>of the volume of documents and the timeframe in which

762
00:46:55.679 --> 00:46:58.639
<v Speaker 1>those documents had to be released, and I believe most

763
00:46:58.679 --> 00:47:02.760
<v Speaker 1>people in the office shared those concerns. Question and were

764
00:47:02.760 --> 00:47:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the guidelines in place for DOJ employees on how to

765
00:47:05.440 --> 00:47:09.920
<v Speaker 1>make redactions? Answer? I believe Deputy Attorney General Blanche now

766
00:47:09.960 --> 00:47:13.519
<v Speaker 1>Acting Attorney General Blanche let out those guidelines for their reviewers,

767
00:47:14.039 --> 00:47:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the attorney who reviewed the material, and I believe some

768
00:47:17.320 --> 00:47:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of it the protocol is listed in the memos as well.

769
00:47:20.119 --> 00:47:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Question are you aware of whether the DOJ employees tasked

770
00:47:23.480 --> 00:47:26.559
<v Speaker 1>with conducting redactions whether they had to undergo any kind

771
00:47:26.599 --> 00:47:29.639
<v Speaker 1>of training? Answer? I don't recall, I believe so, I'm

772
00:47:29.679 --> 00:47:33.599
<v Speaker 1>not certain. Question and I recognize that you may have

773
00:47:33.639 --> 00:47:37.039
<v Speaker 1>briefly touched on this, But were there any criteria for

774
00:47:37.079 --> 00:47:41.239
<v Speaker 1>the attorneys that were selected to make the redactions? Answer?

775
00:47:41.519 --> 00:47:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Criteria about the attorneys themselves? Question as far as the

776
00:47:44.679 --> 00:47:47.800
<v Speaker 1>five hundred attorneys that were selected to contribute to the effort?

777
00:47:48.400 --> 00:47:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Answer yeah, as our recall, we used many from our

778
00:47:51.360 --> 00:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>National Security Division because they're highly qualified and also deal

779
00:47:55.039 --> 00:47:58.920
<v Speaker 1>with protecting victims and confidential information on a routine basis.

780
00:47:59.360 --> 00:48:03.039
<v Speaker 1>But as well as prosecutors from multiple jurisdictions. But how

781
00:48:03.039 --> 00:48:07.760
<v Speaker 1>they were specifically chosen, I'm not sure. Question Attorney General Bondi,

782
00:48:08.159 --> 00:48:11.760
<v Speaker 1>did you yourself ever redact documents produced under the Epstein

783
00:48:11.800 --> 00:48:16.599
<v Speaker 1>File Transparency Act? Answer? No. Question were you consulted as

784
00:48:16.639 --> 00:48:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to whether or not something should be redacted? Answer? I

785
00:48:19.400 --> 00:48:23.280
<v Speaker 1>don't believe so. Emmer. I would now like to introduce

786
00:48:23.320 --> 00:48:26.239
<v Speaker 1>what will be marked majority Exhibit five, and I'll give

787
00:48:26.280 --> 00:48:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you a moment to review. Question. This is the Department

788
00:48:30.840 --> 00:48:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of Justice memorandum dated January fourth, twenty twenty six, entitled

789
00:48:35.800 --> 00:48:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Attorney Review Protocol for Epstein Files. Bondi, Yeah, and this

790
00:48:40.480 --> 00:48:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is from the Deputy Attorney General's office. Yeah. Question Attorney

791
00:48:44.440 --> 00:48:48.800
<v Speaker 1>General Bondi, do you recognize the document? Answer? Yes, I

792
00:48:48.840 --> 00:48:51.920
<v Speaker 1>have not read it in its entirety. Question is this

793
00:48:52.039 --> 00:48:54.360
<v Speaker 1>document that you were referring to when I asked you

794
00:48:54.480 --> 00:48:58.480
<v Speaker 1>whether there was a process for DOJ employees to redact? Answer? Yes,

795
00:48:58.880 --> 00:49:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you asked about training. Yeah, and this is a very

796
00:49:01.280 --> 00:49:04.519
<v Speaker 1>detailed memo as to what specifically under the law can

797
00:49:04.559 --> 00:49:08.280
<v Speaker 1>be released and what should be redacted. Question. According to

798
00:49:08.360 --> 00:49:11.039
<v Speaker 1>the document, and specifically on the top of page six,

799
00:49:11.639 --> 00:49:14.320
<v Speaker 1>there is a highly confidential list of victim names that

800
00:49:14.440 --> 00:49:16.880
<v Speaker 1>must be redacted. Are you aware of a list of

801
00:49:16.960 --> 00:49:20.960
<v Speaker 1>victim names that needed to be redacted? Bondi yeah, not

802
00:49:21.000 --> 00:49:23.760
<v Speaker 1>specifically what victim, but I believe that list kept growing

803
00:49:23.800 --> 00:49:27.039
<v Speaker 1>as well. Question, and I believe that you mentioned this before.

804
00:49:27.719 --> 00:49:29.960
<v Speaker 1>This was one of your main concerns as part of

805
00:49:30.000 --> 00:49:34.119
<v Speaker 1>producing the documents under the EFTA. Is that right? Bondy Yes.

806
00:49:34.400 --> 00:49:37.599
<v Speaker 1>Question or any victims or their attorneys contacted for the

807
00:49:37.679 --> 00:49:42.079
<v Speaker 1>creation of this list? Bondi, I believe so. Question was

808
00:49:42.079 --> 00:49:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice contacted by victims or their attorneys

809
00:49:45.400 --> 00:49:49.679
<v Speaker 1>to create the list? Answer? I believe so. I also

810
00:49:49.760 --> 00:49:52.480
<v Speaker 1>believe the list was ongoing and while the redactions were

811
00:49:52.480 --> 00:49:56.719
<v Speaker 1>being done, I recall, we would receive more victim names. Therefore,

812
00:49:56.760 --> 00:49:59.039
<v Speaker 1>the attorneys doing the redactions would have to go back

813
00:49:59.280 --> 00:50:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and search for the additional names as well. Question what

814
00:50:02.599 --> 00:50:05.320
<v Speaker 1>information would have been used to inform the list of

815
00:50:05.360 --> 00:50:11.519
<v Speaker 1>victim names after the redaction? Bondy, I don't recall. Question

816
00:50:11.760 --> 00:50:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is it safe to assume that Todd Blanche would have

817
00:50:13.800 --> 00:50:16.960
<v Speaker 1>been the individual who would have approved the list? Answer yes.

818
00:50:17.400 --> 00:50:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Question understanding the time constraints related to thirty days of

819
00:50:21.519 --> 00:50:24.519
<v Speaker 1>redacting millions of pages of documents. It seems that there

820
00:50:24.639 --> 00:50:29.039
<v Speaker 1>was some redaction mistakes. Is that correct? And these redaction

821
00:50:29.159 --> 00:50:35.000
<v Speaker 1>mistakes were both under inclusive and overinclusive? How did that happen? Answer?

822
00:50:35.119 --> 00:50:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe given the volume of documents, and again the

823
00:50:37.760 --> 00:50:40.960
<v Speaker 1>intense short timeframe in which hundreds of lawyers were working

824
00:50:41.039 --> 00:50:44.559
<v Speaker 1>around the clock, even on holidays to get these documents out,

825
00:50:44.719 --> 00:50:47.719
<v Speaker 1>there were mistakes. I believe Todd Blanche said it was

826
00:50:47.719 --> 00:50:50.760
<v Speaker 1>about one percent error rate. But I would say we

827
00:50:50.840 --> 00:50:54.239
<v Speaker 1>all believe that if one victim's name is inadvertently released,

828
00:50:54.440 --> 00:50:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a failure. Question If the department was made aware

829
00:50:58.400 --> 00:51:01.559
<v Speaker 1>of a mistake, how did it respond? Answer by correcting

830
00:51:01.599 --> 00:51:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that mistake as fast as we could. Question and again,

831
00:51:04.840 --> 00:51:07.719
<v Speaker 1>would that have been fall into then Deputy Attorney General

832
00:51:07.760 --> 00:51:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Todd Blanche? Answer yes? Question did he brief you on

833
00:51:11.960 --> 00:51:16.400
<v Speaker 1>certain mistakes? Answer? Not specifically, just that I recall when

834
00:51:16.400 --> 00:51:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a victim's name. Everyone was upset when a victim's name

835
00:51:19.320 --> 00:51:23.800
<v Speaker 1>got released inadvertently. Question as far as the victims themselves

836
00:51:24.280 --> 00:51:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and those that may have been inadvertently unredacted in the files,

837
00:51:28.000 --> 00:51:30.920
<v Speaker 1>did they reach out to you? Answer? I don't believe so.

838
00:51:31.320 --> 00:51:34.000
<v Speaker 1>And I believe I saw online one victim's name and

839
00:51:34.119 --> 00:51:37.480
<v Speaker 1>she said she her name had been released, and that

840
00:51:37.679 --> 00:51:39.920
<v Speaker 1>was really the extent of my involvement on that. I

841
00:51:39.960 --> 00:51:42.400
<v Speaker 1>called Todd right away instead of victim is saying her

842
00:51:42.480 --> 00:51:45.199
<v Speaker 1>name was released and it shouldn't have been, but it

843
00:51:45.199 --> 00:51:49.119
<v Speaker 1>would have been something that I saw online. Question did

844
00:51:49.159 --> 00:51:52.039
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice have any avenues for individuals whose

845
00:51:52.119 --> 00:51:55.159
<v Speaker 1>names may have been redacted or unredacted in the files

846
00:51:55.599 --> 00:51:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to reach out to the department and remedy the situation.

847
00:51:59.039 --> 00:52:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Answer I don't recall that process, how that process worked,

848
00:52:03.119 --> 00:52:06.719
<v Speaker 1>and that could have been done with the FBI. Question

849
00:52:07.079 --> 00:52:08.840
<v Speaker 1>was there a team in charge of checking for and

850
00:52:08.880 --> 00:52:13.960
<v Speaker 1>correcting any errors made in the release of the files? Answer? Yes,

851
00:52:14.079 --> 00:52:17.119
<v Speaker 1>done in the direction of Todd Blanche. Question do you

852
00:52:17.159 --> 00:52:20.679
<v Speaker 1>have any idea of how many corrections were made? Answer?

853
00:52:20.960 --> 00:52:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't. All right, folks, we're gonna wrap up right here,

854
00:52:24.480 --> 00:52:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and in the next episode dealing with the topic, we're

855
00:52:26.480 --> 00:52:29.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna pick up where we left off. All the information

856
00:52:29.440 --> 00:52:32.039
<v Speaker 1>that goes with this episode can be found in the

857
00:52:32.079 --> 00:52:32.920
<v Speaker 1>description box.
