WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>What's up everyone, and welcome back to the program. In

2
00:00:03.000 --> 00:00:04.799
<v Speaker 1>this episode, we're going to pick up where we left

3
00:00:04.839 --> 00:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>off with a comprehensive review of the Moscow murders. In

4
00:00:09.400 --> 00:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the courtroom, evidence doesn't just prove, it narrates. Every piece

5
00:00:14.320 --> 00:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>tells a story, a timeline of movements, intent, presence, And

6
00:00:19.359 --> 00:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>when prosecutors laid out their case against Brian Colberger, they

7
00:00:22.640 --> 00:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>weren't just arguing that he was guilty. They were reconstructing

8
00:00:25.440 --> 00:00:29.239
<v Speaker 1>a path from Pullman to Moscow, from theory to action,

9
00:00:29.640 --> 00:00:34.399
<v Speaker 1>from sheath to cell tower, from planning to blood. On

10
00:00:34.520 --> 00:00:37.799
<v Speaker 1>January fifth, twenty twenty three, the probable cause affid David

11
00:00:37.799 --> 00:00:39.799
<v Speaker 1>in the case of the State of Idaho versus Brian

12
00:00:39.840 --> 00:00:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Colberger was unsealed. Within it lay at the scaffolding of

13
00:00:43.399 --> 00:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the state's theory that Brian Colberger, acting alone, entered the

14
00:00:47.280 --> 00:00:50.719
<v Speaker 1>eleven twenty two King rode home on November thirteenth, twenty

15
00:00:50.759 --> 00:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, between four and four twenty a m and

16
00:00:54.039 --> 00:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>stabbed four University of Idaho's students to death with a

17
00:00:57.320 --> 00:01:01.079
<v Speaker 1>fixed blade knife. The case, those are substantial in nature,

18
00:01:01.439 --> 00:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>is not without weight. The prosecution has built its foundation

19
00:01:04.519 --> 00:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>on six pillars of forensic and digital evidence. Each one

20
00:01:08.079 --> 00:01:12.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't just point to Coburger. They overlap, reinforce, and synchronize.

21
00:01:13.400 --> 00:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's examine them one by one. The knife sheath and DNA.

22
00:01:17.959 --> 00:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the prosecution's forensic cornerstone. During the initial crime

23
00:01:21.799 --> 00:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>scene sweep, investigators recovered a tan leather knife sheath next

24
00:01:25.799 --> 00:01:29.159
<v Speaker 1>to Madison Mogan's body. The sheath was identified as a

25
00:01:29.200 --> 00:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>k bar combat style sheath bearing the insignia of the

26
00:01:32.280 --> 00:01:35.799
<v Speaker 1>United States Marine Corps on the button stap of the sheath.

27
00:01:35.920 --> 00:01:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Analysts found a single source of male DNA that DNA

28
00:01:39.400 --> 00:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>did not match anyone in Cotis. This left investigators with

29
00:01:43.799 --> 00:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>two choices, wait for a suspect or create one. When

30
00:01:47.439 --> 00:01:50.519
<v Speaker 1>Brian Coburger was identified as a person of interest through

31
00:01:50.560 --> 00:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the vehicle tracking and cell phone data which we'll get to,

32
00:01:54.120 --> 00:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>agents recovered trash from his family's residence in all Brightville, Pennsylvania,

33
00:01:58.680 --> 00:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>where he was staying over the holiday. Inside the trash

34
00:02:02.040 --> 00:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a discarded item with his father's DNA. The familial DNA

35
00:02:07.040 --> 00:02:09.759
<v Speaker 1>was then used to triangulate the profile recovered from the

36
00:02:09.800 --> 00:02:14.319
<v Speaker 1>knife sheath. According to FBI forensic reports, at least ninety

37
00:02:14.400 --> 00:02:17.199
<v Speaker 1>nine point nine nine nine eight percent of the male

38
00:02:17.280 --> 00:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>population would be excluded as the biological contributor. The defense

39
00:02:21.840 --> 00:02:27.039
<v Speaker 1>will likely challenge this as touched DNA, easily transferable, potentially contaminated,

40
00:02:27.280 --> 00:02:30.439
<v Speaker 1>but the state's position is that its direct contact DNA

41
00:02:30.680 --> 00:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>deposited during the act of the crime. It is, as

42
00:02:34.000 --> 00:02:37.599
<v Speaker 1>of now, the only known physical forensic link tying Coburger

43
00:02:37.639 --> 00:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to the interior of the house. Two cell phone tower data.

44
00:02:42.520 --> 00:02:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Coburger's cell phone didn't betray him directly. It betrayed him

45
00:02:45.719 --> 00:02:49.159
<v Speaker 1>by going silent. Investigators obtained a search warrant for his

46
00:02:49.199 --> 00:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>cell phone records, and what they found painted a chilling picture.

47
00:02:53.240 --> 00:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>On the night of the murders, Coburger's phone pinged on

48
00:02:56.120 --> 00:02:59.479
<v Speaker 1>a WSU tower at two forty two am. From two

49
00:02:59.560 --> 00:03:02.039
<v Speaker 1>forty six seven am to four forty eight am, the

50
00:03:02.080 --> 00:03:05.879
<v Speaker 1>phone went completely dark, no pings, no app activity, no

51
00:03:06.000 --> 00:03:10.599
<v Speaker 1>Wi Fi usage. This blackout period precisely matches the suspected

52
00:03:10.639 --> 00:03:14.039
<v Speaker 1>time of the murders. Then, just before five AM, his

53
00:03:14.199 --> 00:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>phone reactivated and ping near Blaine, Idaho, on the route

54
00:03:18.360 --> 00:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>away from Moscow. But it gets worse. Records show that

55
00:03:22.159 --> 00:03:25.199
<v Speaker 1>Coberger's phone had pinged in the area of eleven twenty

56
00:03:25.199 --> 00:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>two King Road on at least twelve prior occasions, beginning

57
00:03:28.680 --> 00:03:31.759
<v Speaker 1>in August of twenty twenty two. The visits all occurred

58
00:03:31.840 --> 00:03:36.599
<v Speaker 1>late at night or early in the morning. Prosecutors interpret

59
00:03:36.680 --> 00:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>this as pre attack surveillance evidence of stalking behavior and

60
00:03:40.479 --> 00:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>familiarizing himself with the route. Defense may argue he was

61
00:03:44.159 --> 00:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a grad student who commuted frequently and the pings don't

62
00:03:47.639 --> 00:03:51.199
<v Speaker 1>prove presence, but the totality twelve visits no friends in

63
00:03:51.240 --> 00:03:54.159
<v Speaker 1>the house late night times followed by a murdered day

64
00:03:54.159 --> 00:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>blackout is compelling. Three vehicle surveillance the white Alantra the

65
00:04:00.319 --> 00:04:03.759
<v Speaker 1>white twenty fifteen Hondai Lantra was never a random tip.

66
00:04:03.879 --> 00:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>It was a turning point of the investigation. Between three

67
00:04:07.360 --> 00:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine and four to twenty am on November thirteenth,

68
00:04:10.360 --> 00:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>multiple security and traffic cameras in the King Road neighborhood

69
00:04:13.479 --> 00:04:17.079
<v Speaker 1>recorded a white sedan making repeated passes near the house.

70
00:04:18.000 --> 00:04:20.399
<v Speaker 1>At one point, the car executed a three point turn

71
00:04:20.639 --> 00:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the street, odd behavior. At that hour,

72
00:04:23.959 --> 00:04:27.319
<v Speaker 1>surveillance cameras caught the car driving east on King Road,

73
00:04:27.560 --> 00:04:30.759
<v Speaker 1>circling the block, returning four times to the vicinity of

74
00:04:30.800 --> 00:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>eleven twenty two King Road, exiting at high speed at

75
00:04:34.160 --> 00:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>four twenty a m. The car was eventually traced back

76
00:04:37.240 --> 00:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to Coburger through a series of meticulous data matches. His

77
00:04:40.959 --> 00:04:45.759
<v Speaker 1>registration showed a white twenty fifteen Hondaia Lantra. The car

78
00:04:45.800 --> 00:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>had no front license plate, which matched security footage. A

79
00:04:49.079 --> 00:04:52.079
<v Speaker 1>traffic stop in August had photographed the car and confirmed

80
00:04:52.120 --> 00:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>Coburger's appearance, including bushy eyebrows at detail. One surviving roommate

81
00:04:56.920 --> 00:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>recalled seeing on the masked man who left the scene.

82
00:05:00.759 --> 00:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>In addition, coburgers registered his car in Washington State on

83
00:05:04.360 --> 00:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>November eighteenth, five days after the murders, raising eyebrows about

84
00:05:08.360 --> 00:05:11.319
<v Speaker 1>whether he was trying to reduce scrutiny from the Idaho

85
00:05:11.360 --> 00:05:16.959
<v Speaker 1>Bolo for surveillance behavior and post crime movements. After the murders,

86
00:05:17.000 --> 00:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>Coberger's behavior became its own piece of evidence. Surveillance teams

87
00:05:20.879 --> 00:05:24.839
<v Speaker 1>tracked him extensively through interior cleaning of his vehicle, including

88
00:05:24.879 --> 00:05:28.639
<v Speaker 1>removal of the floor mats and seat covers, wearing latex

89
00:05:28.680 --> 00:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>gloves while grocery shopping, disposing of trash at odd hours,

90
00:05:32.240 --> 00:05:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and neighboring bins. Returning to the crime scene area on

91
00:05:35.519 --> 00:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the morning after the murders at nine twelve a m.

92
00:05:38.600 --> 00:05:42.879
<v Speaker 1>According to cell phone pings. Psychologically, this fits a known

93
00:05:42.920 --> 00:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>pattern a fender returns to the scene to relive the act,

94
00:05:46.639 --> 00:05:51.519
<v Speaker 1>gauge investigation progress, or confirm their success. It also undermines

95
00:05:51.560 --> 00:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>any argument of coincidence. Five. Behavioral profile and academic obsession.

96
00:05:58.000 --> 00:06:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Coburger's academic background and just contextualize the crime it potentially

97
00:06:02.480 --> 00:06:06.199
<v Speaker 1>informed it. He was a PhD candidate in criminology, studying

98
00:06:06.279 --> 00:06:11.079
<v Speaker 1>offender behavior, decision making, and compulsive crime. He had conducted

99
00:06:11.079 --> 00:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and now notorious Reddit survey asking participants about their thoughts, emotions,

100
00:06:15.759 --> 00:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and choices while committing crimes. He studied under doctor Catherine Ramsland,

101
00:06:20.519 --> 00:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>an expert on serial killers, including BTK. Prosecutors are likely

102
00:06:25.879 --> 00:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to argue that Coberger didn't just plan this crime, he

103
00:06:29.040 --> 00:06:33.199
<v Speaker 1>built it. Like his thesis project. His movements, preparation and

104
00:06:33.319 --> 00:06:39.879
<v Speaker 1>silence afterwards show premeditation and intellectual detachment. Number six, the

105
00:06:39.959 --> 00:06:43.279
<v Speaker 1>surviving witness account. The most chilling human element in the

106
00:06:43.279 --> 00:06:46.959
<v Speaker 1>affid David comes from the surviving roommate. Her statement forms

107
00:06:46.959 --> 00:06:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the only visual identification of the alleged killer. According to her,

108
00:06:50.839 --> 00:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>around four am, she was awoken by what sounded like

109
00:06:53.920 --> 00:06:57.199
<v Speaker 1>crying and a loud thud. She opened the door and

110
00:06:57.240 --> 00:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>saw a masked man dressed in black walking toward her

111
00:06:59.839 --> 00:07:03.519
<v Speaker 1>and then out the sliding glass door. She described a

112
00:07:03.560 --> 00:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>man as tall and athletically built, wearing a mask over

113
00:07:07.040 --> 00:07:11.199
<v Speaker 1>his nose and mouth, with bushy eyebrows. She locked her

114
00:07:11.199 --> 00:07:14.519
<v Speaker 1>door and did not call nine one one. That detail

115
00:07:14.560 --> 00:07:18.199
<v Speaker 1>has been controversial, but it aligns with trauma response theory

116
00:07:18.439 --> 00:07:22.399
<v Speaker 1>fight flight or freeze. Her observation, paired with the car

117
00:07:22.439 --> 00:07:26.199
<v Speaker 1>phone and DNA evidence, creates a multi modal timeline. It

118
00:07:26.279 --> 00:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>also introduces eyewitness risk no full face partial memory, fear

119
00:07:30.560 --> 00:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>fueled interpretation, but the detail about the eyebrows, later echoed

120
00:07:34.639 --> 00:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>by the August body camera footage of Cohburger adds credibility

121
00:07:39.639 --> 00:07:44.879
<v Speaker 1>search warrant executions the apartment and vehicle. When Cohburger was arrested,

122
00:07:44.959 --> 00:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>his apartment and pullman and his HONDEI Lantro were searched

123
00:07:48.360 --> 00:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>from his apartment. Police recovered black loves, a shop back

124
00:07:51.879 --> 00:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>with trace red stains, a laptop, and multiple data storage devices,

125
00:07:56.079 --> 00:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>receipts from old stores showing cleaning supplies, poss hair strands

126
00:08:01.759 --> 00:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>from his car seat, belt buckle swabs, trunk carpet fibers,

127
00:08:05.720 --> 00:08:09.079
<v Speaker 1>gas pedal and brake swabs, stains in debris from floor mats.

128
00:08:09.360 --> 00:08:12.079
<v Speaker 1>We still haven't received word on many of the materials,

129
00:08:12.319 --> 00:08:15.279
<v Speaker 1>but they form the basis for a lot of discovery requests,

130
00:08:16.000 --> 00:08:19.639
<v Speaker 1>legal week spots. In defense strategy, the evidence, while extensive,

131
00:08:19.879 --> 00:08:22.959
<v Speaker 1>is in bulletproof and here's where the defense will likely

132
00:08:23.000 --> 00:08:26.519
<v Speaker 1>focus touch DNA. The defense will argue that dNaM the

133
00:08:26.600 --> 00:08:30.319
<v Speaker 1>knife sheath could be transferred, not deposited through direct contact.

134
00:08:30.759 --> 00:08:35.039
<v Speaker 1>No murder weapon. The actual knife was never recovered. Cell

135
00:08:35.120 --> 00:08:39.279
<v Speaker 1>tower in precision pings aren't GPS. They show general areas,

136
00:08:39.320 --> 00:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>not precise location. No video of entry or exit. No

137
00:08:43.600 --> 00:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>security cam caught them at the door or inside the home.

138
00:08:46.720 --> 00:08:49.799
<v Speaker 1>Lack of motive. There is still no confirmed link between

139
00:08:49.879 --> 00:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Coburger and the victims. No text messages, no social media

140
00:08:53.440 --> 00:08:59.519
<v Speaker 1>interactions or non visual contact. Behavior is not proof. Strange

141
00:08:59.519 --> 00:09:02.759
<v Speaker 1>behavior is in guilt, wearing gloves in public, driving at night,

142
00:09:03.039 --> 00:09:06.639
<v Speaker 1>or being solitary or not crimes. The defense will try

143
00:09:06.639 --> 00:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to reframe the case as confirmation bias, a suspect who

144
00:09:10.120 --> 00:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>fit too well, causing investigators to build backward from an assumption.

145
00:09:15.200 --> 00:09:18.399
<v Speaker 1>The prosecution will argue the opposite, that the entire digital,

146
00:09:18.440 --> 00:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>behavioral and forensic record was pointing at him before they

147
00:09:22.240 --> 00:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>even knew his name. The case against Brian Colberger is

148
00:09:25.080 --> 00:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>not built on a single smoking gun. It's built like

149
00:09:27.720 --> 00:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a rope braided strands of surveillance, forensics, behavior, and absence.

150
00:09:32.679 --> 00:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Any one thread might be frayed, but the collective it holds.

151
00:09:36.759 --> 00:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>What remains now is to test that rope an open court.

152
00:09:41.279 --> 00:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>The defense strategy and legal battlefield ahead in the court room.

153
00:09:44.639 --> 00:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Guilt is not about what you know, It's about what

154
00:09:47.240 --> 00:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>you can prove, and for Brian Colberger's defense team, the

155
00:09:50.720 --> 00:09:54.279
<v Speaker 1>fight isn't about clearing his name through innocence. It's about

156
00:09:54.360 --> 00:09:57.919
<v Speaker 1>challenging every inch of evidence the state will try to present.

157
00:09:58.559 --> 00:10:01.879
<v Speaker 1>In this battle. The blade is procedural, the weapon is

158
00:10:01.960 --> 00:10:05.559
<v Speaker 1>reasonable doubt, and the arena is a death penalty case

159
00:10:05.720 --> 00:10:10.879
<v Speaker 1>that will define modern criminal litigation in America. On January fifth,

160
00:10:10.960 --> 00:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three, Brian Coberger stood in the Layta County

161
00:10:14.000 --> 00:10:17.879
<v Speaker 1>court room for his first public appearance in Idaho. Shackled,

162
00:10:18.159 --> 00:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>silent and blank faced, he listened as the judge read

163
00:10:21.399 --> 00:10:24.399
<v Speaker 1>four charges of first degree murder and one count of

164
00:10:24.399 --> 00:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>felony burglary. He did not speak, except to acknowledge that

165
00:10:27.720 --> 00:10:31.279
<v Speaker 1>he understood the charges. What followed was the early movement

166
00:10:31.320 --> 00:10:34.399
<v Speaker 1>of a slow, methodical war between the state of Idaho,

167
00:10:34.519 --> 00:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>backed by federal resources and public outrage, and a defense

168
00:10:38.279 --> 00:10:41.759
<v Speaker 1>team led by capitol qualified attorney and Taylor, one of

169
00:10:41.799 --> 00:10:45.879
<v Speaker 1>the most experienced public defenders in the state. This would

170
00:10:45.919 --> 00:10:48.399
<v Speaker 1>not be a fast trial and it would not be

171
00:10:48.440 --> 00:10:51.159
<v Speaker 1>a clean one. With the state sitting on a mountain

172
00:10:51.159 --> 00:10:54.559
<v Speaker 1>of circumstantial evidence but no murder weapon, no confirm motive,

173
00:10:54.759 --> 00:10:57.799
<v Speaker 1>and no video footage inside the house, the defense path

174
00:10:57.960 --> 00:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>was clear, not to disprove the c TME, but to

175
00:11:01.639 --> 00:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>dismantle the narrative. All right, we're going to wrap up

176
00:11:04.879 --> 00:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>right here, and in the next episode, we're going to

177
00:11:06.799 --> 00:11:09.559
<v Speaker 1>pick up where we left off. All of the information

178
00:11:09.639 --> 00:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that goes with this episode can be found in the

179
00:11:12.279 --> 00:11:15.799
<v Speaker 1>description box. What's up, everyone, and welcome back to the program.

180
00:11:16.120 --> 00:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>In this episode, we're picking up with our exhaustive look

181
00:11:19.159 --> 00:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>at the murders in Moscow and then the investigation into

182
00:11:23.399 --> 00:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Brian Colberger who is Anne Taylor and c Taylor is

183
00:11:28.039 --> 00:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>not a courtroom novice, as the chief of the Cootney

184
00:11:31.399 --> 00:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>County Public Defender's Office. She's handled numerous murder cases and

185
00:11:35.399 --> 00:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>desertified to defend clients in capital trials. She took over

186
00:11:39.440 --> 00:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Coburger's case within hours of his extradition to Idaho, immediately

187
00:11:43.240 --> 00:11:46.799
<v Speaker 1>stepping down from representing the Gonsalves family in a separate matter,

188
00:11:47.120 --> 00:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>sparking minor ethical controversy that was later resolved, But her

189
00:11:51.279 --> 00:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>appointment signaled something bigger. The state is preparing for a

190
00:11:55.039 --> 00:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>death penalty case, and Taylor is building her defense accordingly.

191
00:11:59.200 --> 00:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Her strategy, based on court filings and procedural maneuvers, is

192
00:12:02.840 --> 00:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>emerging in four parts. Evidentary suppression, contamination and chain of

193
00:12:07.279 --> 00:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>custody arguments, alternative suspect theories, and narrative inversion through reasonable doubt.

194
00:12:14.120 --> 00:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with suppression of DNA evidence. The single source

195
00:12:17.720 --> 00:12:20.279
<v Speaker 1>mal DNA found on the knife sheath is the centerpiece

196
00:12:20.320 --> 00:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of the prosecution's case. If it stays in Coburger's defense

197
00:12:24.039 --> 00:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>has a major hill decline. If it's suppressed, the case

198
00:12:27.360 --> 00:12:32.159
<v Speaker 1>could collapse. Taylor's filings have already indicated plans to challenge

199
00:12:32.200 --> 00:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the validity of the FBI's genetic genealogy process, specifically the

200
00:12:37.240 --> 00:12:40.080
<v Speaker 1>method used to build the familial match between the trash

201
00:12:40.200 --> 00:12:44.679
<v Speaker 1>DNA and the sheath, the use of private genealogical databases,

202
00:12:44.720 --> 00:12:47.519
<v Speaker 1>which may fall into legal gray areas if law enforcement

203
00:12:47.799 --> 00:12:51.559
<v Speaker 1>acts as data without consent or court order. The question

204
00:12:51.600 --> 00:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of whether the FBI's identification process violated Coburger's Fourth Amendment rights.

205
00:12:56.759 --> 00:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>This strategy is rooted in growing legal tension. When law

206
00:12:59.519 --> 00:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>enforcement uses private ancestry data to create investigative leads without

207
00:13:04.120 --> 00:13:08.399
<v Speaker 1>judicial oversight, does it constitute a search? According to Judge Hippler,

208
00:13:08.639 --> 00:13:11.039
<v Speaker 1>it did not, But if a judge ruled that the

209
00:13:11.120 --> 00:13:14.159
<v Speaker 1>process used to match Colberger's father's DNA to the sheath

210
00:13:14.480 --> 00:13:18.879
<v Speaker 1>was overly invasive or lacks efficient judicial authorization, that could

211
00:13:18.879 --> 00:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>have led to the key forensic link being thrown out.

212
00:13:21.639 --> 00:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Two attacking the chain of custody. Defense filings also suggest

213
00:13:25.440 --> 00:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Taylor intends to raise alarms about evidence contamination and chain

214
00:13:29.360 --> 00:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>of custody breaks. The knife sheath was discovered at the

215
00:13:32.600 --> 00:13:36.039
<v Speaker 1>crime scene after multiple civilians had entered the home before police.

216
00:13:36.480 --> 00:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>The surviving roommates call friends to the house, creating early

217
00:13:39.840 --> 00:13:43.159
<v Speaker 1>uncontrolled access. There's no evidence that the knife sheath was

218
00:13:43.200 --> 00:13:47.159
<v Speaker 1>bagged and sealed immediately upon discovery. No mention of blood

219
00:13:47.240 --> 00:13:50.639
<v Speaker 1>or prints on the sheath, raising the possibility of secondary transfer.

220
00:13:51.559 --> 00:13:54.919
<v Speaker 1>Taylor will argue that in a crime scene as contaminated

221
00:13:54.960 --> 00:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>as this one, with first responders not suspecting murder, when

222
00:13:58.679 --> 00:14:01.799
<v Speaker 1>entering the idea that col Burger's DNA couldn't have been

223
00:14:01.840 --> 00:14:06.639
<v Speaker 1>transferred indirectly as scientifically invalid. She'll bring in forensic experts

224
00:14:06.679 --> 00:14:10.559
<v Speaker 1>to explain touch DNA transfer possibilities, from door handles to

225
00:14:10.639 --> 00:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>shared surfaces to airborne particulate transfer. And if she convinces

226
00:14:15.519 --> 00:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the jury that reasonable doubt exists about how the DNA

227
00:14:18.440 --> 00:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>got there, even the prosecution's strongest evidence becomes a maybe

228
00:14:23.080 --> 00:14:26.639
<v Speaker 1>three creating the shadow of another suspect. It's one of

229
00:14:26.639 --> 00:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the oldest plays in the defense book point to a

230
00:14:29.039 --> 00:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>missing suspect even if you can't name them. Taylor doesn't

231
00:14:32.360 --> 00:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>need to prove someone else committed the murders. She only

232
00:14:34.759 --> 00:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>needs to introduce the possibility. No murder weapon has been found,

233
00:14:38.440 --> 00:14:41.639
<v Speaker 1>no security camera caught Coburger entering or exiting the house,

234
00:14:42.120 --> 00:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>no witness places him inside. Besides a witness who didn't

235
00:14:45.200 --> 00:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>see his face, there are hundreds of white launtras in

236
00:14:48.039 --> 00:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the region. There's no confirm motive. The roommates were left alive.

237
00:14:51.840 --> 00:14:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Why what does that mean about intent? Expect Taylor to

238
00:14:56.039 --> 00:14:59.159
<v Speaker 1>lean on these gaps. She may argue that Coburger was

239
00:14:59.159 --> 00:15:02.679
<v Speaker 1>a convenient suspec effect, that law enforcement was under public pressure,

240
00:15:02.919 --> 00:15:05.919
<v Speaker 1>and that they reverse engineered their narrative based on what fit.

241
00:15:06.519 --> 00:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>She may suggest someone else knew the victims, that the

242
00:15:08.919 --> 00:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>killings were personal, and that there is more than one killer.

243
00:15:12.399 --> 00:15:16.159
<v Speaker 1>And even without proof, the suggestion creates oxygen for doubt,

244
00:15:17.039 --> 00:15:20.519
<v Speaker 1>destroying the timeline through reasonable doubt. At the corra, tailor's

245
00:15:20.519 --> 00:15:24.519
<v Speaker 1>strategy is undermining the state's timeline. The prosecution's version is

246
00:15:24.519 --> 00:15:28.759
<v Speaker 1>tightly constructed. Colburger's car enters the area, his phone goes dark,

247
00:15:29.080 --> 00:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>he commits the murders, his car flees a scene. He

248
00:15:31.840 --> 00:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>returns hours later, but timelines are fragile. Taylor will argue

249
00:15:36.120 --> 00:15:39.399
<v Speaker 1>that cell tower pings or not GPS, camera timestamps can

250
00:15:39.480 --> 00:15:42.919
<v Speaker 1>be off by seconds or minutes, car matches aren't precise,

251
00:15:43.399 --> 00:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>his phone going dark is not illegal. She may present

252
00:15:46.559 --> 00:15:49.879
<v Speaker 1>experts who challenge whether the gaps in Colburger's digital footprint

253
00:15:50.159 --> 00:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>actually place them at the house. Or merely in the proximity.

254
00:15:53.879 --> 00:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>If she succeeds in muddying the timeline, the precision of

255
00:15:57.039 --> 00:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the state's narrative dissolves, and with it, the illusion of certainty.

256
00:16:01.919 --> 00:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>In June of twenty twenty three, the Leytau County Prosecutor's

257
00:16:04.879 --> 00:16:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Office filed its notice of intent to seek the death

258
00:16:07.279 --> 00:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>penalty that raised the bar for both sides. To secure death,

259
00:16:11.320 --> 00:16:15.399
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution must prove aggravating factors such as multiple victims

260
00:16:15.480 --> 00:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>or heinous cruel conduct, that Coburger poses a continuing threat,

261
00:16:19.879 --> 00:16:23.759
<v Speaker 1>that the crime shows utter disregard for human life. For

262
00:16:23.840 --> 00:16:28.039
<v Speaker 1>the defense, this introduces a second trial phase, penalty mitigation.

263
00:16:28.559 --> 00:16:32.679
<v Speaker 1>If convicted, Taylor will shift to humanizing Coburger, presenting mental

264
00:16:32.720 --> 00:16:37.399
<v Speaker 1>health history, family trauma, neurological evaluations, and lack of prior

265
00:16:37.480 --> 00:16:41.159
<v Speaker 1>criminal behavior. The second phase becomes life or death battle

266
00:16:41.440 --> 00:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>over whether Coburger is executed or sentenced to life without parole.

267
00:16:46.200 --> 00:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>But Taylor's true objective is to prevent that phase entirely

268
00:16:49.440 --> 00:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>by securing an acquittal or a mistrial through evidence suppression

269
00:16:52.960 --> 00:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and narrative fracture. Jury selection the next battlefield. This case

270
00:16:58.240 --> 00:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>cannot be tried like a typical murder. True, considering we've

271
00:17:01.399 --> 00:17:04.759
<v Speaker 1>already had a change of venue, look for jurors being

272
00:17:04.799 --> 00:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>sequestered an individual Vordyre, allowing deep psychological vetting of each

273
00:17:09.839 --> 00:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>jur for bias, social media exposure, or preconceptions about criminology.

274
00:17:15.400 --> 00:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Because of the highly publicized nature of the case, each

275
00:17:18.039 --> 00:17:21.400
<v Speaker 1>potential jur will be evaluated not just for fairness, but

276
00:17:21.480 --> 00:17:25.440
<v Speaker 1>for emotional resistance to horror. The case isn't just about facts.

277
00:17:25.759 --> 00:17:29.319
<v Speaker 1>It's about whether twelve people can sit through photos, testimony,

278
00:17:29.519 --> 00:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and silence and still decide based on law, not outrage. Legally,

279
00:17:34.519 --> 00:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution carries the full burden. They must prove that

280
00:17:37.559 --> 00:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Coburger entered the home, that he murdered the victims, that

281
00:17:40.480 --> 00:17:44.279
<v Speaker 1>he did so with premeditation. The defense must prove nothing.

282
00:17:44.480 --> 00:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Their job is to erode in the court room. It

283
00:17:47.000 --> 00:17:50.799
<v Speaker 1>will be expert versus expert on DNA, analysts versus analysts

284
00:17:50.839 --> 00:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>on phone data, human emotion verse procedural logic. This will

285
00:17:55.119 --> 00:17:58.519
<v Speaker 1>be a war of credibility, clarity, and stamina, one that

286
00:17:58.559 --> 00:18:02.880
<v Speaker 1>has already lasted years. Sometimes the loudest thing in a

287
00:18:02.920 --> 00:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>court room is in testimony. It's silence. Brian Colberger isn't talking,

288
00:18:07.359 --> 00:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>His attorneys aren't talking. The judges silenced, the police, the prosecution,

289
00:18:11.559 --> 00:18:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the victims' families, and even the witnesses. And in that silence,

290
00:18:15.279 --> 00:18:19.799
<v Speaker 1>a different kind of noise has taken over tiktoks, YouTube psychics,

291
00:18:19.960 --> 00:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>reddit threads, conspiracy charts, and digital hunger to be first,

292
00:18:23.759 --> 00:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>not right. In the absence of speech, the court of

293
00:18:26.680 --> 00:18:30.079
<v Speaker 1>public opinion has become the loudest court room in the country.

294
00:18:30.799 --> 00:18:34.079
<v Speaker 1>The silence Brian Colberger has never made a public statement

295
00:18:34.119 --> 00:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>about the murders. Not at the time of his arrest,

296
00:18:36.720 --> 00:18:40.519
<v Speaker 1>not during his extradition from Pennsylvania to Idaho, not during

297
00:18:40.519 --> 00:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>his first court appearance, not after his indictment, not after

298
00:18:43.759 --> 00:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution announced its intent to seek the death penalty.

299
00:18:47.599 --> 00:18:49.640
<v Speaker 1>When asked by the judge if he wanted to enter

300
00:18:49.680 --> 00:18:52.599
<v Speaker 1>a plea at his arraignment, Coburger replied with a blank stare.

301
00:18:53.000 --> 00:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>His attorney then invoked not guilty on his behalf. That

302
00:18:56.519 --> 00:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>silence isn't accidental. It's a calculated legal strategy. Every word

303
00:19:01.200 --> 00:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that a defendant says before trial is a potential weapon

304
00:19:04.200 --> 00:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>against them, especially in a case where the evidence is

305
00:19:06.960 --> 00:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>circumstantial and the legal path to conviction runs through a

306
00:19:10.440 --> 00:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>reasonable doubt. Coburger's silence is part of legal insulation, part

307
00:19:15.079 --> 00:19:18.880
<v Speaker 1>psychological war. He knows the world wants to hear from him,

308
00:19:18.960 --> 00:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>he refuses. That refusal has created a vacuum, and vacuums

309
00:19:23.440 --> 00:19:28.039
<v Speaker 1>don't stay empty for long. On January third, twenty twenty three,

310
00:19:28.559 --> 00:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Leyta County Magistrate Judge Megan Marshall issued a sweeping non

311
00:19:32.160 --> 00:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>dissemination order, what most people call a gag order. It

312
00:19:36.039 --> 00:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>barred all attorneys, law enforcement agencies, investigators, victims, families, and

313
00:19:40.759 --> 00:19:44.759
<v Speaker 1>witnesses from making public statements about the case. The stated

314
00:19:44.799 --> 00:19:48.039
<v Speaker 1>purpose to preserve Coburger's right to a fair trial and

315
00:19:48.119 --> 00:19:52.319
<v Speaker 1>prevent prejudicial pre trial publicity, but it came with a cost.

316
00:19:52.839 --> 00:19:57.079
<v Speaker 1>In shutting down official communication, the court also handcuffed the truth.

317
00:19:57.559 --> 00:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>When people search for updates, they didn't get AFID, davidkids,

318
00:20:00.279 --> 00:20:04.319
<v Speaker 1>or court records. They got clickbait live streams, amateur theories,

319
00:20:04.480 --> 00:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>and unhinged speculation. Even the victims' families were silenced. Kay

320
00:20:09.279 --> 00:20:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Gonsovas's father, Steve Gonsalves, publicly criticized the gag order. I'm

321
00:20:13.640 --> 00:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to be quiet. My tatter's gone. You don't

322
00:20:16.480 --> 00:20:19.160
<v Speaker 1>get to tell me how to mourn her, but the

323
00:20:19.200 --> 00:20:23.319
<v Speaker 1>gag order stood, and into that information void came the crowd.

324
00:20:23.640 --> 00:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Within forty eight hours of Coburger's arrest, Reddit threads began

325
00:20:26.920 --> 00:20:30.319
<v Speaker 1>to map his alleged rought, examine his appearance, dissect as

326
00:20:30.359 --> 00:20:33.799
<v Speaker 1>college papers, and even analyze his body language in court.

327
00:20:34.440 --> 00:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>TikTok videos flooded with creators acting out scenes from the crime.

328
00:20:38.279 --> 00:20:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Some posed as the victims, speculating how they died. Others

329
00:20:41.880 --> 00:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>played Coburger narrating imagined monologues from his perspective. YouTube live

330
00:20:47.240 --> 00:20:51.079
<v Speaker 1>streamers built entire channels around daily updates on the case,

331
00:20:51.319 --> 00:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>often with zero access to real evidence. Some of the

332
00:20:54.279 --> 00:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>most egregious examples included fake psychic readings claiming to channel

333
00:20:58.359 --> 00:21:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the victims, baseless accusations against surviving roommates, claims that Coburger

334
00:21:03.440 --> 00:21:06.319
<v Speaker 1>was framed by the FBI, and women falling in love

335
00:21:06.359 --> 00:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>with Coburger like he was Ted Bundy, treating this like

336
00:21:09.079 --> 00:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>a Netflix drama instead of a murder case. The Gonsalvis

337
00:21:13.359 --> 00:21:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and Mogan families repeatedly ask people to stop spreading lies,

338
00:21:16.920 --> 00:21:19.880
<v Speaker 1>but the flood couldn't be stopped. In the digital age,

339
00:21:19.920 --> 00:21:22.799
<v Speaker 1>high profile murder case is never just a trial. Its

340
00:21:22.839 --> 00:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>content conspiracies filled the silence like mold and a sealed room.

341
00:21:28.319 --> 00:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Some claim Coleburger was part of a secret government program

342
00:21:31.240 --> 00:21:35.640
<v Speaker 1>studying criminal behavior. Others argued the killings were ritual. Still

343
00:21:35.680 --> 00:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>others pushed the narrative that Colburger had accomplices, despite no

344
00:21:39.519 --> 00:21:42.839
<v Speaker 1>evidence supporting it. One YouTube channel claimed to have proof

345
00:21:42.920 --> 00:21:46.039
<v Speaker 1>Colburger had a relationship with one of the victims, citing

346
00:21:46.039 --> 00:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>body language cues and digital energy. The video got over

347
00:21:50.160 --> 00:21:53.519
<v Speaker 1>two million views before being debumped. Even as the court

348
00:21:53.559 --> 00:21:56.880
<v Speaker 1>moved forward filing motion, setting dates, assembling witness lists, the

349
00:21:56.920 --> 00:22:00.079
<v Speaker 1>internet had made up its mind. It wasn't about justice.

350
00:22:00.200 --> 00:22:04.039
<v Speaker 1>It was about who could monetize the mystery first. Once

351
00:22:04.039 --> 00:22:08.519
<v Speaker 1>misinformation begins, it's almost impossible to undo. Here's how it spread.

352
00:22:08.799 --> 00:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Random user posts on Reddit. TikTok creator screenshots it and

353
00:22:12.400 --> 00:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>adds dramatic narration. YouTube channel builds a thirty minute video

354
00:22:16.000 --> 00:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>around it. Twitter accounts amplify it, saying why aren't MSM

355
00:22:20.319 --> 00:22:24.519
<v Speaker 1>reporting this? Mainstream news picks it up as online speculation,

356
00:22:24.839 --> 00:22:28.039
<v Speaker 1>giving it legitimacy. Now it's not just a theory, it's

357
00:22:28.079 --> 00:22:32.799
<v Speaker 1>a cycle. All of this isn't just noise, it's legally dangerous.

358
00:22:33.319 --> 00:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Colberger has a constitutional right to a fair trial, which

359
00:22:36.440 --> 00:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>means an impartial jury. But how do you find twelve

360
00:22:39.279 --> 00:22:42.519
<v Speaker 1>people who haven't already seen the false claims that Colberger

361
00:22:42.640 --> 00:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>was a BTK copycat, the leaked fabricated crime scene photos,

362
00:22:47.039 --> 00:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the endless YouTube thumbnails calling him a psychopath. You can,

363
00:22:50.759 --> 00:22:53.759
<v Speaker 1>and the defense knows that, and Taylor will use this

364
00:22:53.839 --> 00:22:57.279
<v Speaker 1>to her advantage, already getting a change of venue, looking

365
00:22:57.279 --> 00:23:01.039
<v Speaker 1>to individually question every jur about media exposure and sequester

366
00:23:01.160 --> 00:23:04.759
<v Speaker 1>the jury during trial, because the more poison the jury pool,

367
00:23:04.799 --> 00:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the more reasonable doubt can be injected. Meanwhile, Coburger has

368
00:23:09.480 --> 00:23:12.799
<v Speaker 1>said nothing, but you can guarantee hees listening. Sources say

369
00:23:12.839 --> 00:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>he reads every filing, watches the public response, knows the

370
00:23:16.240 --> 00:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>narrative swirling about him. His silence does two things. It

371
00:23:20.079 --> 00:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>keeps his options open. If the state case weakens, he

372
00:23:22.720 --> 00:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>can consider a plea. If it strengthens, he can claim

373
00:23:25.519 --> 00:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>he was respectful of the process all along. It creates mystique.

374
00:23:29.160 --> 00:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>In the public's eye. Silence becomes ambiguity, and ambiguity becomes

375
00:23:33.200 --> 00:23:36.759
<v Speaker 1>a mirror. People will project onto it. Some see guilt

376
00:23:37.000 --> 00:23:41.079
<v Speaker 1>others see escapegoat, a few even see a misunderstood genius,

377
00:23:41.559 --> 00:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and in silence, all of it can be true until

378
00:23:44.279 --> 00:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the trial makes one version real. The Gonsalves, Mogan, Kernodle,

379
00:23:48.960 --> 00:23:52.039
<v Speaker 1>and Shapin families are living through a double trauma, the

380
00:23:52.079 --> 00:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>loss of their children and the public dissection of that loss.

381
00:23:56.599 --> 00:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Under the gag order, they have been prevented from speaking freely,

382
00:23:59.720 --> 00:24:02.279
<v Speaker 1>but the the Internet hasn't, and every day they're forced

383
00:24:02.279 --> 00:24:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to watch people debating how their children screamed, live streams

384
00:24:05.960 --> 00:24:09.559
<v Speaker 1>ranking the most suspicious, roommates comment sections mocking their mourning.

385
00:24:10.480 --> 00:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Their silence isn't protective, it's weaponized against them, and this

386
00:24:14.640 --> 00:24:17.400
<v Speaker 1>is the human cost of gag orders in a viral

387
00:24:17.559 --> 00:24:22.359
<v Speaker 1>media environment. As the trial nears, two parallel stories are

388
00:24:22.440 --> 00:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>racing towards collision. The court story based on evidence, testimony,

389
00:24:26.359 --> 00:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and procedure, the internet story based on content, outrage and clout.

390
00:24:30.480 --> 00:24:33.400
<v Speaker 1>But only one of them matters, and that is inside

391
00:24:33.440 --> 00:24:36.759
<v Speaker 1>the courtroom, and that's where the public narrative goes to die.

392
00:24:37.039 --> 00:24:38.640
<v Speaker 1>All Right, We're going to wrap up right here, and

393
00:24:38.759 --> 00:24:40.559
<v Speaker 1>in the next episode we're gonna pick up where we

394
00:24:40.680 --> 00:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>left off. All of the information that goes with. This

395
00:24:43.279 --> 00:24:46.880
<v Speaker 1>episode can be found in the description box What's up everyone,

396
00:24:46.960 --> 00:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and welcome back to the program. In this episode, we're

397
00:24:49.680 --> 00:24:52.599
<v Speaker 1>picking up where we left off with our exhaustive recap

398
00:24:52.960 --> 00:24:55.799
<v Speaker 1>of the murders in Moscow and now the trial of

399
00:24:55.799 --> 00:25:00.599
<v Speaker 1>Brian Coohberger. There's nothing dramatic about justice. It doesn't just

400
00:25:00.680 --> 00:25:03.519
<v Speaker 1>come with background music or a last minute confession. It

401
00:25:03.559 --> 00:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>comes in motions, delays, ruling stipulations, jury pools, and sworn oh's.

402
00:25:08.759 --> 00:25:11.799
<v Speaker 1>It comes late, and when it arrives. If it arrives,

403
00:25:11.960 --> 00:25:14.319
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't heal. It just ends the fight. For now.

404
00:25:15.960 --> 00:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Brian Koeberger's trial has not begun. It's been more than

405
00:25:19.160 --> 00:25:23.160
<v Speaker 1>two years since yearly morning of November thirteenth, twenty twenty two,

406
00:25:23.200 --> 00:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>when four students were murdered in their beds at eleven

407
00:25:26.279 --> 00:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty two King Rhode. He's been charged, he's been indicted,

408
00:25:30.359 --> 00:25:32.839
<v Speaker 1>but no jury has heard yet a single word of

409
00:25:32.880 --> 00:25:37.839
<v Speaker 1>live testimony. That's not a delay, it's by design. Coberger's

410
00:25:37.880 --> 00:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>defense waived his right to a speedy trial in August

411
00:25:40.359 --> 00:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty three. That triggered an open ended pre

412
00:25:43.319 --> 00:25:46.160
<v Speaker 1>trial window, one that his attorneys have used the file

413
00:25:46.319 --> 00:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>dozens of mootions, demands for evidence, and constitutional challenges, and

414
00:25:50.799 --> 00:25:53.799
<v Speaker 1>every one of those filings has slowed the process, because

415
00:25:54.079 --> 00:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the point. In a death penalty case. The burden

416
00:25:57.319 --> 00:26:00.519
<v Speaker 1>is on the state to present a perfect trial, error,

417
00:26:00.599 --> 00:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>one bad ruling, one piece of flawed evidence, one mistranslation

418
00:26:04.400 --> 00:26:08.279
<v Speaker 1>of a constitutional right, and the conviction doesn't stick. So

419
00:26:08.359 --> 00:26:12.599
<v Speaker 1>the defense doesn't need to rush. They need to fracture, delay, suppress,

420
00:26:12.880 --> 00:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>weaken in the courtroom. Time is leverage, and Colberger's silence

421
00:26:16.960 --> 00:26:19.119
<v Speaker 1>has bought his team plenty of it with the trial

422
00:26:19.160 --> 00:26:22.839
<v Speaker 1>looming in August. It's built around the idea that pretrial

423
00:26:22.920 --> 00:26:26.039
<v Speaker 1>litigation will eventually run out of oxygen, but it hasn't yet,

424
00:26:26.480 --> 00:26:30.279
<v Speaker 1>and the system is not built to move quickly, especially

425
00:26:30.559 --> 00:26:34.319
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about a capital murder case. The State

426
00:26:34.319 --> 00:26:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of Idaho filed its formal intent to seek the death

427
00:26:36.680 --> 00:26:39.400
<v Speaker 1>penalty in June of twenty twenty three. It listed the

428
00:26:39.440 --> 00:26:43.519
<v Speaker 1>statutory aggravators required by Idaho law. That more than one

429
00:26:43.599 --> 00:26:46.799
<v Speaker 1>person was murdered, that the murders were especially heinous, atrocious,

430
00:26:46.839 --> 00:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>or cruel, and that the defendant exhibited uttered disregard for

431
00:26:50.519 --> 00:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>human life. That the murders were committed in the commission

432
00:26:53.480 --> 00:26:56.839
<v Speaker 1>of a felony burglary that the defendant poses a continuing

433
00:26:56.880 --> 00:27:02.119
<v Speaker 1>threat to society. Those aren't editorial statements, their legal criteria

434
00:27:02.319 --> 00:27:05.640
<v Speaker 1>pulled directly from the Idaho Code Section nineteen twenty five

435
00:27:05.680 --> 00:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen. To secure death, the prosecution must prove the

436
00:27:09.480 --> 00:27:12.119
<v Speaker 1>existence of at least one of them beyond a reasonable

437
00:27:12.160 --> 00:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>doubt during the penalty phase after a guilty verdict, which

438
00:27:16.000 --> 00:27:19.039
<v Speaker 1>means this trial, if it gets there, will be bifurcated.

439
00:27:19.440 --> 00:27:23.599
<v Speaker 1>Phase one guilt twelve jurors must unanimously convict Coburger of

440
00:27:23.680 --> 00:27:27.640
<v Speaker 1>all four murders and the burglary phase two penalty. The

441
00:27:27.720 --> 00:27:32.039
<v Speaker 1>same twelve jurors hear aggravation and mitigation arguments. Only if

442
00:27:32.079 --> 00:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>they unanimously agree that death is warranted will he be

443
00:27:35.039 --> 00:27:38.880
<v Speaker 1>sentenced to execution. If even one juror disagrees, he gets

444
00:27:38.880 --> 00:27:42.039
<v Speaker 1>life in prison. That's the legal landscape, but the road

445
00:27:42.039 --> 00:27:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to get there is mine riddled. But prosecution has no confession,

446
00:27:46.839 --> 00:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>no murder weapon, no eye witness placing Colburger inside the

447
00:27:50.000 --> 00:27:53.160
<v Speaker 1>house besides one that will be challenged, no video of

448
00:27:53.240 --> 00:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>him entering or exiting, no known relationship between him and

449
00:27:56.039 --> 00:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the victims. That's the hole in the center of their case.

450
00:27:59.279 --> 00:28:03.279
<v Speaker 1>But the edges, the edges are sharp. His DNA was

451
00:28:03.319 --> 00:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>recovered from a snap of a k bar knife sheath

452
00:28:05.519 --> 00:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>found inches from a victim's body. His white Hondai Lantra

453
00:28:09.359 --> 00:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>was captured on camera circling the neighborhood multiple times in

454
00:28:12.519 --> 00:28:15.799
<v Speaker 1>the hours before the murders. His cell phone records show

455
00:28:15.880 --> 00:28:18.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve prior trips to the area of the house between

456
00:28:18.680 --> 00:28:23.440
<v Speaker 1>August and November, always late at night, always brief. His

457
00:28:23.599 --> 00:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>phone went dark between two forty seven a m. And

458
00:28:26.359 --> 00:28:28.640
<v Speaker 1>four forty eight a m. On the night of the murders,

459
00:28:29.000 --> 00:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly during the murder window, and then reactivated on a

460
00:28:32.240 --> 00:28:35.319
<v Speaker 1>route away from the scene. He was back near the

461
00:28:35.359 --> 00:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>scene hours later. According to tower pings, a surviving roommate

462
00:28:38.960 --> 00:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>described a massed intruder with bushy eyebrows, a description that

463
00:28:42.519 --> 00:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>matches the police stop of Coleburger from a previous August.

464
00:28:45.519 --> 00:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>This evidence, introduced in court and supported by expert testimony,

465
00:28:49.279 --> 00:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>created a narrative of opportunity, intent, and postcrime behavior consistent

466
00:28:53.480 --> 00:28:56.359
<v Speaker 1>with guilt. But the state must do more than tell

467
00:28:56.400 --> 00:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a story, and must tell one without holes because the

468
00:28:59.480 --> 00:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>defense is already sharpening its blades, and Taylor and her

469
00:29:02.920 --> 00:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>team have laid the groundwork. They're not running a shadow campaign.

470
00:29:06.160 --> 00:29:09.839
<v Speaker 1>Their strategy is visible, legible, and deliberate. It includes motions

471
00:29:10.039 --> 00:29:12.359
<v Speaker 1>to suppress the DNA evidence based on a ledge for

472
00:29:12.440 --> 00:29:16.279
<v Speaker 1>the amendment, violations in the collection of genealogical data from

473
00:29:16.279 --> 00:29:20.079
<v Speaker 1>private databases. Motions challenging the reliability of cell phone tower

474
00:29:20.160 --> 00:29:24.359
<v Speaker 1>data including signal bounced, tower overlap and location radius error.

475
00:29:24.799 --> 00:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Motions to compel discovery on FBI behavioral analysts, claiming the

476
00:29:28.680 --> 00:29:32.599
<v Speaker 1>profile used to pursue Coburger may have unduly bias the investigation,

477
00:29:33.240 --> 00:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>assertions that the crime scene was compromised due to delays

478
00:29:36.400 --> 00:29:40.359
<v Speaker 1>in sealing civilians entering the house before police arrived and

479
00:29:40.519 --> 00:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>lack of early contamination controls, and they've already received a

480
00:29:44.319 --> 00:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>change of venue after arguing that the media saturation an

481
00:29:47.440 --> 00:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>online hysterio would have poisoned the jury pool in Leyta County.

482
00:29:51.640 --> 00:29:54.519
<v Speaker 1>Taylor doesn't have to prove innocence. She needs to disrupt

483
00:29:54.559 --> 00:29:58.799
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution structure. One crack, one juror who doubts the timeline,

484
00:29:59.000 --> 00:30:01.599
<v Speaker 1>one ruling that limit it's key forensic evidence, and the

485
00:30:01.640 --> 00:30:05.279
<v Speaker 1>trial could become unstable. If the DNA is excluded, the

486
00:30:05.319 --> 00:30:09.759
<v Speaker 1>state's case becomes almost entirely circumstantial. If the timeline can

487
00:30:09.799 --> 00:30:13.559
<v Speaker 1>be confused, the opportunity windows shrinks. If the jury is

488
00:30:13.599 --> 00:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>skeptical of digital evidence pings, cameras data, the prosecution loses

489
00:30:18.559 --> 00:30:22.359
<v Speaker 1>its cohesion. Taylor is banking on technical fracture, and if

490
00:30:22.359 --> 00:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>she finds it, the rest could be a mistrial, hung jury,

491
00:30:25.960 --> 00:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>or even acquittal. Even with the gag order in place

492
00:30:30.000 --> 00:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>since January of twenty twenty three, the public narrative is

493
00:30:32.759 --> 00:30:36.319
<v Speaker 1>not quieted. The online hysteria surrounding the case is mutated

494
00:30:36.559 --> 00:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>into a permanent economy, with YouTube channels that conduct nightly

495
00:30:41.079 --> 00:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>live streams, TikTok creators, post role playing re enactments of

496
00:30:45.440 --> 00:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the murders, Reddit threads, float unsupported theories involving other potential suspects,

497
00:30:50.279 --> 00:30:54.759
<v Speaker 1>dark web conspiracies, and planted evidence. Instead of dissecting court

498
00:30:54.799 --> 00:30:57.759
<v Speaker 1>documents that hit the docket, every statement is parse for

499
00:30:57.839 --> 00:31:01.039
<v Speaker 1>hidden meaning, every silence is interpreted. It is guilt, cunning,

500
00:31:01.319 --> 00:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>or both. This isn't a backdrop, this could be a threat.

501
00:31:05.960 --> 00:31:08.119
<v Speaker 1>The prosecution will need to show that its case is

502
00:31:08.160 --> 00:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>untanted by public pressure. The defense will argue that is impossible.

503
00:31:13.039 --> 00:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>In pre trial filings, Taylor has already laid the groundwork

504
00:31:15.920 --> 00:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>for a claim that Colburger has been prejudged by the public,

505
00:31:19.119 --> 00:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and that the jury, no matter how thoroughly vetted, will

506
00:31:21.720 --> 00:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>be influenced by the cultural saturation of the crime. And

507
00:31:24.720 --> 00:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>while it's certainly a long shot, it's a viable appellate issue,

508
00:31:28.200 --> 00:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and everyone in the courtroom knows it. Let's assume that

509
00:31:31.000 --> 00:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a verdict is reached. Here's what it could look like.

510
00:31:33.279 --> 00:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Scenario one, guilty on all counts, death penalty imposed. Coburger

511
00:31:37.480 --> 00:31:40.759
<v Speaker 1>is sentenced to die by firing squad or lethal injection.

512
00:31:41.200 --> 00:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>The sentence triggers automatic appeals, and he spends the next

513
00:31:44.160 --> 00:31:47.519
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to twenty years in a segregation unit. A wedding resolution.

514
00:31:47.880 --> 00:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Scenario two guilty, life without parole, same conviction, but the

515
00:31:52.039 --> 00:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>jury splits the death penalty phase. He receives four life sentences,

516
00:31:56.039 --> 00:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>no death, but no freedom. Scenario number three hung jury

517
00:32:00.079 --> 00:32:03.359
<v Speaker 1>one or more juries refuse to convict. The result is mistrial.

518
00:32:03.519 --> 00:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>The state refiles the case, and the process starts again.

519
00:32:07.480 --> 00:32:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Scenario number four acquittal, He walks free. Double jeopardy applies

520
00:32:12.160 --> 00:32:14.279
<v Speaker 1>the state cannot try him again. It would be the

521
00:32:14.279 --> 00:32:18.799
<v Speaker 1>most legally defensible and publicly explosive outcome possible. None of

522
00:32:18.799 --> 00:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>these results will bring the victims back, but each will

523
00:32:21.920 --> 00:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>trigger its own legacy. Four people were murdered Kale Gonsalvis, Madison, Mogan,

524
00:32:28.440 --> 00:32:33.319
<v Speaker 1>xanakernodle Ethan Chapin. That doesn't change the trial, the evidence,

525
00:32:33.359 --> 00:32:36.079
<v Speaker 1>the verdict. They only shape what history says about how

526
00:32:36.240 --> 00:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>justice was or wasn't delivered. But the legacy of this

527
00:32:40.119 --> 00:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>case will extend beyond the verdicts. It will impact how

528
00:32:43.599 --> 00:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>DNA from private databases is used by law enforcement in

529
00:32:46.920 --> 00:32:51.079
<v Speaker 1>criminal prosecutions, how courts issue and enforced gag orders in

530
00:32:51.119 --> 00:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the digital age, how social media contaminates the idea of

531
00:32:54.480 --> 00:32:58.079
<v Speaker 1>a fair trial in some cases, how criminology is viewed

532
00:32:58.240 --> 00:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>when the accused as a student of it's a very

533
00:33:00.440 --> 00:33:04.559
<v Speaker 1>thing he is accused of committing. Colberger's case is not

534
00:33:04.640 --> 00:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>just about murder. It's about method, access, data, law, narrative,

535
00:33:09.200 --> 00:33:12.079
<v Speaker 1>and whether the American justice system can still hold the

536
00:33:12.119 --> 00:33:16.079
<v Speaker 1>line between law and spectacle. This case will be studied

537
00:33:16.079 --> 00:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in law schools, It will be dissected in true crime series.

538
00:33:19.319 --> 00:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>It will be remembered in Idaho for generations, and no

539
00:33:22.279 --> 00:33:26.279
<v Speaker 1>matter what happens next, it will leave something behind. There

540
00:33:26.279 --> 00:33:29.119
<v Speaker 1>are no clean endings in stories like this, only rulings,

541
00:33:29.279 --> 00:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>only sentences, only silence after the last word is read

542
00:33:32.880 --> 00:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>aloud in court. But in that silence something is permanent,

543
00:33:36.440 --> 00:33:40.079
<v Speaker 1>a memory, a consequence, a legacy. That's all that's left

544
00:33:40.079 --> 00:33:42.720
<v Speaker 1>when the blood dries, the cameras go dark, and the

545
00:33:42.799 --> 00:33:46.279
<v Speaker 1>court adjourns. All of the information that goes with this

546
00:33:46.400 --> 00:33:49.079
<v Speaker 1>episode can be found in the description box.
