Speaker 1: It's very easy for these jack holes to spend our money.
Speaker 2: It is the biggest scandal in the history of this country,
bar none. Are you guys okay with being called Techito's
because I am totally fine with it.
Speaker 1: I have no problem. You don't turn out a free
tap them. They must have stopped, the top of must
have stopped.
Speaker 2: That is just proof right there that leftist policy is
simply anti Trump. There is no policy except to be
anti Trump.
Speaker 1: Hello, it's Wednesday, right, is it hump Day? It is?
It is? And do you know what else it is?
Speaker 2: Tell me it's actually not today, but two days ago,
on June second, it became official that we are now
closer to the year twenty fifty than we are to
the year two thousand.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, stop it just stop. It's no joke.
It is no joke. That's a real stat that's a
real data. That's a little bit creepy. Sorry, and good morning.
I mean I still remember nineteen eighty nine, you know
what I mean. I'm like, that was like three years ago. Right, No,
it wasn't. Das was years ago. God, that is that
was something to Megan encapsulates. Megan encapsulates, how I feel
when she says, shut up's right, Megan. But it's real,
you guys. It is real. It's a real stat.
Speaker 2: And speaking of things that are or are not real,
you guys, remember Tiffany Gomez who is famous for being
the crazy lady on the plane who said that m
effort isn't real.
Speaker 1: Remember where is it real? Do you remember?
Speaker 3: Remember?
Speaker 2: As you remember, well, she made a big announcement yesterday
on her Twitter machine, and that is that she is
really launching a career on Passes.
Speaker 1: What's that? Well, that is exactly what I said.
Speaker 2: So I went to her link that is Passes dot
com slash Tiffany Gomes, and I went to go screenshot
what I saw there, and then all of a sudden,
I get this warning that says, it looks like you're
trying to screenshot and we're going to sue you if
you do that, And I was like.
Speaker 1: What the hell?
Speaker 2: So I did not screenshot it, but I thought, what's
to stop me from sharing it?
Speaker 1: Right? Like, what would stop me from.
Speaker 2: Showing you what is an available website?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 1: So let me show that to you what I saw.
Speaker 2: So this is what it looks like when you go there,
and essentially it's like OnlyFans only. It's just a different name,
is what it appears to be. Because if you you can,
there's these tiers where you can join to see her
various levels of membership, like you for ten bucks a
month you get messages to her, or you can have
like chatting and like more pictures, I guess, and then
for sixty nine ninety nine you see what she did there?
Speaker 1: Oh sixty nine, I see what she did there?
Speaker 2: Right, then it's like all like there it's unlimited whatever
and unlimited priority messaging, like people can like slip into
her DMS, so it's like OnlyFans, right, look at her,
she's yeah, third picture, she's like, look at my bibs.
Speaker 1: Not really, but look, if you want to look at
my bibs, pay sixty nine ninety nine for my rights.
Speaker 2: And then even like they're very legally because you can
even see the legal notice that says, any and all
material posted on this profile is safeguarded by DMCA laws.
Any individual responsible for leaking copyrighted content will be immediately
suspended and subject.
Speaker 1: To legal action. Yeah, did you see her response to
all this? Her response, Yeah, did you see it? What
do you mean? Her response? Her response, like, people are like,
what you're basically doing OnlyFans? Oh okay, And she responded
and she was like because we were like, is this
is your new career? That's what somebody asked her, and
she goes career, y'all will do anything for clicks. It's
just a side hustle. As I still have a full
on career in marketing and real estate development, never stop
doing that. So, like, is her career in real estate
and marketing is that a met fort real? Because I
don't think it's real. I don't think that career is
because if those careers were actually real, she wouldn't be
doing this side hustle, right. I mean then I.
Speaker 2: Thought that she was really successful in said career, right,
So I maybe it's just it seems like it's just
sort of more of a vanity project than anything else.
Speaker 1: It makes me sad. It makes me sad that women
do this crap. It does.
Speaker 2: Yeah, she's naked, Maybe she's not naked. I have no
idea because obviously I don't pay to see the exclusive content.
Perhaps it's all super clean.
Speaker 1: I don't know. It still makes me sad, though, that
women do this crap. And you know what I'm saying like,
this is like our daughters are seeing this stuff and
then they're like, oh so I can make more money
just like show them mclee. And then and rather than
actually go have a real career. You see what I'm saying.
I know, I totally give it. This sucks man. Anyways,
you guys, you know what doesn't stuck is Blackout Coffee.
Blackout Coffee is awesome. They're unapologetically conservative. The coffee is amazing.
They have flavors. You guys should be starting your morning
with Blackout and us. Visit blackoutcofee dot com slash chicks
use code checks at checkout for twenty percent off your
first order. Please do that. Also, please visit our socials.
You can do that at www. Dot chicks on the
right dot com slash links. Look at all those places.
Look at them. It's a lot. It's a lot of places.
Speaker 6: Man.
Speaker 1: Oh great, We're everywhere and it's so pink that out.
And then also subscribe to this podcast. If you haven't
done that already, please do that. Just click subscribe. It
really helps us out, you guys. We would appreciate that.
Thank you, Thank you.
Speaker 2: All right, let's get into some things and some stuff, obviously,
lots and lots of chatter still about the discussing attack
in Bolder, and Jake Tapper, who still has a show,
although very few people are watching it, as we've come
to find out, he had the mayor of Boulder, Colorado
on to talk about the attack and the aftermath of it.
Here is a bit of that conversation.
Speaker 1: I just wonder.
Speaker 7: We've seen anti semitism on the right, we've seen anti semitism.
Speaker 8: On the left.
Speaker 7: It's obviously a real problem on the left. Right now,
do you think the Democratic Party needs to be doing
more to condemn anti semitism and to make it clear
that violence against Jews is not acceptable, because there does
seem to be an Overton window shifting where this kind
of thing is acceptable. The Democratic Socialists of America. There
was a story in the Free Press last week about
how there was an internal debate in the dsay about
whether killing those two Israelis was okay, Oh my god.
Speaker 3: No.
Speaker 9: I mean, violence like this is never acceptable, and it's
certainly not acceptable here in Boulder, nor was it in
Pennsylvania or in DC. And I think it's incumbent on
all of us to condemn this kind of hate and
this kind of needless violence. You can have your political differences,
it's fair to have a debate and talk passionately about
how you think things should be different. But this kind
of terror attack like we saw yesterday and Boulder, there's nothing.
Speaker 4: To justify that. And I think it's important for all
of us who are in elected office, who are public figures,
to make it clear that anti Semitism is unacceptable in
our country, it's unacceptable in our community, and we need
to get that message out there loud and clear, because
the attacks are only ratcheting up again.
Speaker 1: I don't know how you can be a Democrat and
a Jew. I don't know.
Speaker 2: And by the way, that is a sanctuary city pointing
that out, seeing as how the attacker, of course was
an illegal.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I just man, the Democrats are lost, just lost.
Speaker 2: They're just on the wrong side of everything.
Speaker 1: It's a very single thing, and they want it and
they not only are they on the wrong side, but
they are on the wrong side so hard, you know,
like they just they dig their heels and they fight it.
They fight for the wrong side. So it's remarkable, it is.
Speaker 2: And I think we mentioned yesterday or the day before
the Dave Ruben is currently doing a tour in Israel,
and so he was walking the streets of Tel Aviv
yesterday just talking about the Gaza and Israel conflict and
asking people why they're not asking the right questions.
Speaker 10: Here he is with that, do you want the war
to end? How about instead of chanting river to the sea,
because this place is never going to be erased. It's
never going to be erased. It's eternal. Well, it's been here,
it will always be here. How About instead of chanting that,
you just take all of that energy and all of
those signs, and instead of locking Jewish students from entering
campus at Columbia and Harvard and all of the evil
that we've now seen proliferated everywhere, how about you just
start chanting release the hostages. Yeah, and if you get
the hostages released, if you get the hostages released, it
all ends. So if you love the Palestinians, which of
course these people don't love the Palestinians, the Gazans, they
don't love them. Nobody, not one person. That Egypt has
a border with Gaza. They could have opened it up
on October eighth and saved everybody, but they don't love them.
They don't love them, and we all know that no
Arab country wants these people.
Speaker 11: Why is that?
Speaker 12: Why is that?
Speaker 10: So there's a lot of hope here. There's a lot
of hope here, and I hope people will start seeing
that and see that something really beautiful.
Speaker 6: This is.
Speaker 10: But the Gazans on October sixth, their beach looked pretty
close to this, their buildings looked kind of close to this,
and they chose to throw it all away. And Israel
is now fighting the most psychotic They're fighting a war
that no other Western nation has ever had to fight
in their life, while being told that they shouldn't fight
the war, that they should leave their own people, that
they should feed the people who are trying to kill them.
No other country would be asked any of these things.
They're asked these things, and they're just going to keep
fighting like that. That's more clear than anything else I've
learned anything while I'm here. These people will not stop
fighting for their existence, and in some sense they're fighting
for all of our existences.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he's absolutely right. People are saying that he's taking
a chance because he's gay. He's not. He's fine in Israel. Yeah,
somebody a chance on what somebody said. He's taking a
risk because he's in he's over there, and he's gay,
but he's fought in Israel. They don't throw them in Israel.
They don't throw gay people on the buildings in Israel
do that because they're not psychotic? Yeah, yeah, that I
don't understand. They also let women walk around and do
things like swim. It's really neat.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there is an unbelief. I just can't even believe
this is like real life when I see videos like this.
But Keith Olberman, who is crazy? I mean, I don't
think at this point there's really any disputing.
Speaker 1: That he is a lunatic mental and.
Speaker 2: He is blaming the attack in Boulder on Trump. Of
course he is. Of course, it's Trump's fall. Here is well,
and it's us too. It's not even Trump, but his
supporters as well. It's anybody in Maga.
Speaker 1: So here's Keith now live on.
Speaker 6: An all new special Tuesday edition of The Countdown podcast.
Blood on Donald Trump's hands, the terror attack Sunday in Boulder, Colorado,
the attempt to burn people alive or commemory aiding the
hostages in Gaza. It is Trump's fault. It is Stephen
Miller's fault, County, it is Magna's fault. Okay, because the
attempt to remove so called illegal aliens from this country
has nothing to do with stopping terrorism or stopping people
who might commit crime. It is here merely to satiate
the sadism of Trump and Miller and the psychopaths who
support them. It is a performance. It is a preliminary
to ethnic cleansing in this country.
Speaker 1: Yeah, what in that world? Okay, So next he's going
to be like nine to eleven was Trump's fault, completely
Trump's fault. We're gonna see him need that. I don't.
He's completely off his rocker. Like, there's no helping that guy, right,
no helping him. Texas Tickler wants me to tell you
to calm down. I'm sorry. I told her. I told her.
Speaker 2: I don't mind it when you tell me anybody else
tells me calm down.
Speaker 1: Cut you, calm down.
Speaker 2: We are very very excited before we get into other
things and stuff, which, of course of which there is
a lot.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we have a new sponsor to tell you about.
So exciting you guys.
Speaker 2: My husband was so stoked when we heard that. When
you heard that these this was going to be our sponsor.
This is a not a meat thermometer. It is something
better and more amazing. It is a chef iq sense
and it is this this cooking accessory that essentially works
like the smartest.
Speaker 1: Meat thermometer that you've ever used in your entire life.
Speaker 2: So instead of having to like cover over a grill
while you're cooking up a steak or maybe you've got
maybe you're cooking chicken in the in the oven, instead
of like hovering and wondering if it's done right, this
thing tells you with the use of an app.
Speaker 1: Okay, that's pretty cool. And I know Greg is like that.
He loves technology magets, Yeah, but then he also likes fire,
you know what I mean. It works, It all just
comes together into like the perfect gift for a dude.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, it is so perfect.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's great for grilling, but it's also great
for just cooking whatever, or even you can even use
it in your air fyer. You can use it literally
any way that you cook. And the greatest thing, the
coolest thing, I think is that like with steaks, for example,
my husband like some pretty rare like they're still mooing essentially,
and then I like medium rare. Our Son likes some
more well done. And so you just get a three pack, right,
you can just get one, you can get two, you
can get three, you can get a three pack, and
then you've got all steaks on the grill and you
know exactly when which one is done according to the
specifications that you've assigned to that one. Like you tell
the app, I want it to be medium rare, and
the app is like, okay, go relax while I cook
this up for you at a perfect medium rare temperature.
It's amazing and it is one of the greatest gifts
you can get for a daddy. O. You can go
to chefiq dot com and just use promo code chicks
to get your fifteen percent off. But this is a
flash sale. I don't know how long that's going to last,
so you need to jump on it again. It's chefiq
dot com promo code chicks, or just use your little
smartphone to grab this little doodle thing of a jiggy.
Speaker 1: It's a QR code, Yes, a QR code, right, you
can just do that doggo whatever that thing is.
Speaker 2: But it's so cool you guys, it's like the coolest
gadget ever.
Speaker 1: So anyway, if.
Speaker 2: You've got a husband or a dad in your life
that loves gadgetry, they are going to eat this thing up.
It's pretty cool and they can cook it with Omaha
steaks and then it's like the perfect gift ever, the
most perfect gift ever.
Speaker 1: Okay, let's continue on.
Speaker 2: Laura Lumer broke the story that the attacker in Boulder's
entire family is now going to be booted out of
the country. So she wrote, DHS has exclusively confirmed to
me that Muslim Brotherhood terrorist Mohammed Solomon's wife and his
five kids have officially been taken into Ice custody and
they are being processed. DHS tells me they became aware
of his children following my Laura Lumoer's exclusive reporting, including
the fact that his daughter just graduated from Thomas mclaran
State Charter School in Colorado and was set to attend
college in Colorado. And so not today she can dig
up the dirt, you guys, There's no one that can
do it better. I am not a fan of hers
for many reasons, but about her investigative work, there is
no doubt that.
Speaker 1: She's the best. Again, she's that early. If you get
a new boyfriend, call Laura and be like, can you
please check this guy out? I would need I need
to know his background before I get involved with him.
She is that girl. She will hook you up. I'm
glad they're all getting booted good because he was like,
I'm gonna wait and be a complete terrorist ass hat
until my daughter finishes high school. Okay to do that. Bye, yeah,
enjoy your life in Kuwait.
Speaker 2: They're actually going back to Kuwait Wait, even though they're
originally from Egypt. I think that they I know, I
think they were most recently from Kuwait. And it just
reminded me of what we read from Marco Rubio yesterday.
I think it was because he said, in light of
yesterday's horrific attack, all terrorists, they're family members and terrast
sympathizers here on a visa should know that under the
Trump administration, we will find you, revoke your visa and
deport you.
Speaker 1: And they good and Democrats, I'm sure are really upset
about this. Oh my god. But their family they're like victims,
you guys, right, We're just a Colorado family, right, right.
But they got the Cole's clothes on. Oh my god,
it's just a Colorado family. Look at us, we're just
per whatever. Bye.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I do not care about this family at all.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. I'm supposed to. I don't. I'm not trying
any less. I'm not sorry. I'm sorry.
Speaker 2: We told you the other day about how so many
media outlets got a story wrong because they immediately were like, oh, ham,
this is according to hamas Israel open fire on innocent
Palestinians and shot a bunch of people. We'll run with
that before doing any checking on it whatsoever.
Speaker 1: Aler, Yeah.
Speaker 13: Right.
Speaker 2: One of the outlets that did that was The Washington Post,
and in their case, it was really really really egregious.
Speaker 1: And they have since made this long apology.
Speaker 2: So originally their story said at least thirty one people
were killed Sunday morning in southern Gaza, according to the Strip. Yeah,
to the Strip's health ministry, when Israeli troops opened fire
on crowds making their way to collecta my god.
Speaker 1: Read their correction. Correction. We've deleted the post below because
it and early versions of the article didn't meet post
fairness standards. Oh ye, the background. Early versions of this
article on Sunday City that Israeli troops had killed more
than thirty people near a US AID site in Gaza,
with the headline attributing the action to quote health officials
end quote. The article failed to make clear off attributing
the death to Israel was the position of the Gaza
health ministry or a fact verified by the Post. The
article and headline were updated on Sunday evening, making it
clear that there was no consensus about who was responsible
for the shootings and that there was a dispute over
that question. While statements from Israel that it was unaware
of injuries and that an initial inquiry indicated its soldiers
didn't fire at civilians near the site were included in
all versions, the Post didn't give proper way to Israel's
denial and gave them proper certitude about what was known
about any Israeli role in the shootings. Oh my god,
the early versions fell short of Post standards of fairness
and should not have been published in that farm. You guys,
do you see what's missing from that statement?
Speaker 2: What's missing is anybody being fired, because if it didn't,
if it didn't, if it fell short of standards of
fairness and should not have been published.
Speaker 1: Then somebody needs.
Speaker 2: To be held accountable, right The law just get to
be like Israel shot up a bunch of people and
then be like, oh are bad, like days later when
the damage is already done.
Speaker 1: The two uses out of the tube, as you would say,
the last paragraph should have been like, oh yeah, and
we'll do it again, right.
Speaker 2: I mean essentially, and of course you know they're not
the only ones. The BBC also just absolutely awful. Hello
fold said the manufacturing of a blood libel in real time.
The BBC they killed thirty one Wait no, it's twenty six. Ah, shoot,
my bad, they did kill anyone? How many people saw
the first reports of a massacre and how many saw
the retraction? That is the strategy. They lie because they
know it'll get a lot of traffic, and then they
quietly retract, knowing that no one cares.
Speaker 1: Exactly, you guys, it's the hole. There are good people
on both sides. Bullshit, that's exactly what it is. It's
like you get it out there and everybody just believes it,
and then it's like, oh wait, but it actually it's
not what he said. It's not what he said. But
we're going to say that really quietly is not what
he said. Everybody already believes it. It's done. The damage
is done, and they know it's done, and they don't care.
They do it on purpose, with purpose. I cannot load
these people enough. I mean, it's just disgusting.
Speaker 2: And so you know, they there's two instances where they
have these headlines saying thirty one dead Israeli gunfire, Israeli
tanks open fire. Oh, and then they quietly correct it
twenty six dead after Israeli tanks open fire, and then
there's the correction.
Speaker 1: You know, it's just so disgusting.
Speaker 2: These people don't verify anything and the only information that
they're taking is of a terrorist organization.
Speaker 1: What in the world. It's not just irresponsible, it's malicious, Yeah,
it absolutely is.
Speaker 2: Caroline Levitt talked about this in her presser yesterday and
she actually called out the WAPO for what we talked
about the other day, which was their headline on fentanyl.
Speaker 1: Do you remember how ridiculous that was?
Speaker 2: So she was calling out just the press on all
of these things. Here is a good bit from Caroline.
Speaker 14: Unlike the BBC, who had multiple headlines they wrote Israeli
tank kills, twenty six Israeli tank kills, twenty one Israeli
gunfire kills thirty one.
Speaker 1: Red Cross is.
Speaker 14: Twenty one people were killed in an eight incident. And
then oh wait, they had to correct and take down
their entire story, saying we reviewed the footage and couldn't
find any evidence of anything. Oh okay, So we're going
to look into reports before we confirm them from this
podium or before.
Speaker 1: We take action.
Speaker 14: And I suggest that journalists who actually care about truth
do the same to reduce the amount of misinformation that's
going around the globe on this front. The Washington Post
just ran one of the most ridiculous headlines ever, even
by their standards. And on my very first briefing several
months ago, I said I would hold anyone accountable in
this room. The Washington Post actually had this headline, the
mysterious drop in FETANL seizures on.
Speaker 1: The US Mexico. O God, how is this mysterious?
Speaker 14: There is no mystery about why there is a decrease
in fetanyl coming into the United States. This administration's strong
border policies are the reason there has been a decrease
in FETANL. Challenge games his strengthened relationship with Mexican President
Shinbam and all of the measures he has been taking
to deter illegal human and drug trafficking at our United
States southern border is the reason for plummeting fetanyl seizures
at the US border. There is nothing mysterious about that,
and we'd like to see the Washington Post update their
headline accordingly.
Speaker 1: This is clearly trying.
Speaker 15: To intentionally manipulate the minds of the Americans, and I
think the American people understand why there's been a fetanyl
drop in Our office responded to this inquiry. We provided
a whole host of the reasons that FETANL seizures at
the southern border have dropped, and the Washington Post refused
to run them.
Speaker 1: And that's despicable. Yeah, the media, the media thinks that,
you know, you're stupid, and half of us are Yeah,
at half of us or not half of us are awake.
We see what they're doing. God, I just that headline.
Speaker 16: I know.
Speaker 1: We talked to man. That was about as bad as
it gets. It's insane, you guys, we have to talk
about dogs for just a moment.
Speaker 12: Such we can't.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the kitties.
Speaker 2: You not giving your pet Rough Greens, what are you
even doing? Your dog and your cat needs nutritional supplements
just like you do.
Speaker 1: Did you know that how half of all.
Speaker 2: Dogs over ten are going to die from some form
of cancer and nearly the rest suffer from some joint
pain or skin issues. And that all leads to their diet.
If you're just feeding your pet dry kibble, it's not enough.
They need the supplementation that they get from rough Greens.
All the essential vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and digestive enzymes that
your animal needs. They get the best nutrition and it's
all thanks to naturopathic doctor Dennis Black, who is the
creator of rough Greens, and it is now, by the way,
the number one pet supplement in America with good reason.
If you haven't tried it, Dogs and cats really like it,
so they get used to having it, this green powder
top their normal dead dry dog food because they know
it brings it to life. They know it tastes delicious,
so it's the best of all worlds, great taste. Your
animals love it. You see really quick results from it,
and everybody's.
Speaker 1: Happy and healthy. And you should make your dog, dogs
and cats happened healthy you can try you should free guys.
Speaker 2: You get free jumpstart bag for either dogs or cats.
When you go to roughchicks dot com, you just cover shipping.
Are you f f chicks dot com? And then of
course don't forget to use code shh.
Speaker 1: Do it.
Speaker 2: Barry Weiss was on with Morning Joe and Mika to
talk about the horrors that are happening in terms of
anti Semitism across the country and how it there needs
to be how much it's changed since like that synagogue
act of terror that we saw, what was that five
or six years ago? And literally everyone had no problem
coming out and saying that's wrong, that's horrible.
Speaker 1: Yeah, no one had a problem with it. And now
it's different. Things have changed, and she talked about that
change right here.
Speaker 3: Forward to these two recent attacks. The perpetrator in the
case of the DC rampage, the murder of your own
Lishinsky and Sarah Milgram, two names that should be known
to everyone in this country, but you will see no
celebrities making videos making sure that we know and say
their names. He was extraordinarily articulate. He was evil when
you read his manifesto, but it was an incredibly coherent,
if not morally upside down worldview.
Speaker 1: So that's the first thing.
Speaker 3: He was radicalized by a movement that has created a
permission structure for violence and the hunting of publicly recognized
Jews in this country. The second thing is the unbelievable
silence of the surrounding culture and, if not silence, open
glorification on the part of some leftist groups that are
celebrating this attack. Since October seventh, the open anti Semitism
in this country has become more profound, not less, And
I think it's profoundly unfortunate that people do not understand
the history and do not understand that what begins with
Jews does not end with Jews.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, you have to understand history, and that
means you have to have a good education system, and
we don't have that. So there's a lot of that missing.
I wonder if that was like inconvenient for Mika and
Joe to hear that a lot of this is uncomfortable.
They looked very uncomfortable with that whole situation there. Yeah,
and she's right about celebrities not saying anything, and there
are a lot of Jewish celebrities who aren't just not
saying anything, but they're still Democrat, which blows me away.
Speaker 2: I know, well, I won't ever understand that. I just
I will not ever get it. You're about to see
a video, so you know how Israel has the Iron Dome,
and how Trump is now talking about building the Golden Dome,
which is a similar anti missile structure, essentially for apparatus
for the United States and possibly Canada.
Speaker 1: We don't know yet. He's charging a lot of money
for them to be involved.
Speaker 2: But regardless, it has worked beautifully for years intercepting missiles
that constantly are being shot at Israel. So the video
that you're about to see comes from Iranian press. Therefore,
I have no idea how much faith you can actually
have in it if it's If it is true what
you're about to hear, But this is essentially about Yemen
coming up with a missile that is anti anti missile.
In other words, it makes the attempt of intercepting a
missile even more dangerous than the missile itself. And if
this is true, this is awful, Like this could be
what leads Israel to use nuclear weapons because they would
have no other defense. And of course then once the
nukes come out. I mean, we're all done that, We're
cooked if that happens.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and so again.
Speaker 2: Take this information with a grain of salt because of
the source.
Speaker 1: But this is terrifying.
Speaker 17: Them any armed forces are rewriting the rules of modern warfare.
Their latest announcement a four chamber fragmentation warhead that activates
upon interception, scattering explosive fragments across multiple locations, a weapon
designed not just to reach its destination, but to punish
those who try to stop it.
Speaker 18: As Israel and its allies should take this thread of
our new fragmented warhead very seriously.
Speaker 19: It's a warhead with four chambers that Israelis may find
above their heads very.
Speaker 17: Soon if the message is chilling and precise. Unlike conventional
warheads that are rendered harmless when intercepted, this new Yemeni
design turns interception into a secondary strike, a strategic twist
meant to render missile defense systems not only in effect,
but dangerous to those who rely on them. In effect,
Yemen has made missile defense itself a liability, a risky
act that might rain down destruction on one's own soil.
Speaker 19: We are now addressing the world from a position of power.
We have a missile that no other nation in the
world possesses. We have a missile that, if intercepted, becomes
more lethal and will lead to explosions across the occupying entity.
We warn you neighboring nations and the traders who are
attempting to intercept our missiles, whether it's Saudi Arabia, UAE,
Jordan or Egypt, if you attempt to intercept our missiles
over your lands, our missiles and explosives will fall on you.
Speaker 17: The strategic calculus for countries like Jordan and Egypt just
became more complicated. Hosting radar systems or allowing interception corridors
may no longer be seen as protective measures but dangerous
gambles with unprecedented outcomes.
Speaker 2: Some people hope it's just propaganda. I would love for
that to just be propaganda.
Speaker 1: But I don't know the bodyline though. Even if it's propaganda,
they would love for that. They would love for that
to be the case, you know what I mean. They
would be those people would be happy if that was
something that was real, even if it's not. I don't
know if it's real. I have no idea if it's propaganda.
I don't know. I have no idea. And because John
asked the question, why haven't they used it already?
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, I mean, I I don't know. If it's
a way of convincing the other countries that they listed, hey,
don't get involved, because if you do, then you could
be a target of these particular weapons, and so that
that could potentially change the calculus of how other nations
help Israel, and that, of course is what they always
mean to do, which is isolate Israel as much as possible.
And so if this is a way of convincing those
neighboring countries, you're going to you're gonna get f't two.
Speaker 1: You know what I mean.
Speaker 2: I don't know, But not knowing is part of the danger, right,
Like you have to just hope that it's not true
and continue on the course that you're on.
Speaker 1: But like, if that's true, that is horrifying, horrifying. These
people will never stop though, you know.
Speaker 2: They just full hateful, terrible, horrible peop They just will
never stop.
Speaker 1: And so much of it is just rooted in anti Semitism.
All of it is rooted anti Semitism, and it's just
like just freaking stop stop. I know, God, it's so frustrating.
It is, isn't it.
Speaker 2: You guys, remember how was it last month that we
had the prager you was doing the ten thousand dollars sweepstakes?
Speaker 1: You remember what it was.
Speaker 2: They have raised the stakes, as they say, so they've
got a different US history quiz. I took it this morning,
and I missed a couple of things, which was actually
a good lesson for me because I was like, this
is really cool. I learned things that I didn't know,
and it's an interesting little fifteen question test and when
you take it, you have a chance of winning twenty
five thousand dollars. So I was super bummed that not
that someone from our audience was not the winner the
two thousand dollars.
Speaker 1: They gave us the name, and I was like, yeah,
that's not Yeah, I know, we're not excited about that.
We want you, guys to somebody in our group to
win it. So you got to do it. It would be
so good. Okay, that's a break ton of money.
Speaker 2: Are you serious? That's life changing money.
Speaker 1: You guys do it?
Speaker 2: Why would you not at least try. All you have
to do is answer fifteen questions and pass the test.
You don't have to get them all right, you just
have to pass. So if you think you know history,
test yourself enter to win with prager you. This ends
on June thirtieth, and I want to make sure that
I get the rules out. There is no purchase necessary.
It ends June thirtieth of this year. You have to
be a US resident. You have to be eighteen or
older to enter. You can see all the official rules
at PragerU dot com slash chicks. That's, of course where
you can also take the test at PragerU dot com.
Slash chicks is avoid where prohibited and it is sponsored
by Prager University Foundation, And so it's just a good
little test ye make sure that you're up to speed
on all of your US history. So check it out
gregeru dot com slash Lots of talk about Doge, lots
of talk about Elon, who came out swinging against the
big beautiful bill yesterday. This was a little bit of
a surprise to a lot of people, but it doesn't
sound like it was this huge surprise to Donald Trump.
And first, before we even get into the Elon stuff,
omb you remember how we learned that in order to
codify the Doge cuts. There had to be a like
a recision something sent from the White House to Congress
saying they're like, officially do this. So omb yesterday tweeted
new today we sent the first recisions package to Capitol Hill.
This package contains billions and wasteful foreign aid and federal
funding for NPR and PBS. And then they said it's
basically up to Congress to act. They have forty five
days to codify these massive cuts to woke, wasteful and
weaponized spending via a simple majority vote.
Speaker 1: They better freaking do it better. Ifrea can do it,
you better do it, or these people are going to
be in big trouble by all people who all of
us out here who have given them a mandate to
do this. You better freaking do it. Better freaking do it.
Speaker 2: But then Elon came out against the big beautiful bill,
and so here is what he initially tweeted. He tweeted
a couple things actually about the bill. He said, I'm sorry,
but I just can't stand it anymore. This, this massive, outrageous,
pork filled congressional spending bill is a disgusting, abomin nation.
Shame on those who voted for it. You know you
did wrong, you know it. And then he went on
to say, in November next year, we will fire all
politicians who betrayed the American people. So that was reason
to give me some pause.
Speaker 1: About the Big Beautiful Bill, right, yep, yep.
Speaker 2: And it gave other people, particularly in the Senate, who
now have the Big Beautiful Bill, they're going through it
and doing all their tweaks or whatnot, to speak out
about it as well. So Mike Lee noted Elon's message
and said, these numbers are nothing short of stunning, because
Elon also tweeted that it's going to massively increase the
gigantic budget deficit to two point five trillion and burden
American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt. And so Mike said,
Congress has hollowed out America's middle class through reckless stuff
is spending, and the inflation that causes the uniparty trademark
propels this vicious cycle and must be stopped in its tracks.
Senate Republicans can make a meaningful dent in the problem
through a combination of one the Big Beautiful Bill for
mandatory spending, two recisions packages for discretionary spending, and three
the appropriations process also discretionary spending. We must commit now
to doing so, as this is what voters justifiably expect
and indeed deserve from the GOP Congress.
Speaker 1: So who are we to listen to? Right? This is
the question? Uh huh. There's a lot of smart people
talking about it. Yeah, I'm kind of listening to both.
I mean, I just think that Elon got into the
swamp and he realized how completely discussed, discussing and swampy
it really is. When he got in there and he's
more linear, He's like, I'm just focused. That's who he is.
He's just a focused dude. He's like, I'm gonna get
this shit done. I'm focused Trump. This is it's not
his first rodeo. I mean, this is at least a
second rodeo with politics. So he understands how this animal,
this gigantic behemoth of an animal works, and he's like,
you got to schmooze a little. He's better at the weaving,
the bobbing and weaving and the schmoozing. That's the art
of the deal and the art of the deal. And
he knows how to get stuff done. And you got
to take the bad with the good and take what
you know what I mean, take that one scoop instead
of two of ice cream like you always say. And
he can do that. Elon is just he doesn't think
that way. I think they love each other. I really
do too. I don't think this anything about it now.
I think they have a general respect and admiration for
one another. They just have two totally different outlooks on
how to get things done. And Trump understands that politically,
you got to do this. Do I agree with it?
I actually I'm probably more Elonish where if I got
in there, I'd probably be more Elonish. I honestly think
that you would probably be more. I think he'd be
more we've got to we've got to take the one scoop.
We got it, and I'd be like, f this, burn
it all down, you know what I mean?
Speaker 10: Like that?
Speaker 1: So I get I kind of get where these two
people are coming from, because, like you and I, if
we were put in these positions, we would have different approaches,
I think, But we also love each other. I think
people just have different approaches when they want to get
stuff done. And totally this is what we're seeing. That's
how I feel about this.
Speaker 2: Well, and I do think I do think when you
said Elon thinks linearly, I think that's so true.
Speaker 1: And I don't know.
Speaker 2: I think, you know, he I would bet that he's
somebody who read the entire bill.
Speaker 1: That just seems like annal thing. He probably did it
in like two hours. He'd probably like speed reddit. Yeah,
But then.
Speaker 2: I wonder because he's reading, Okay, here's the actual legislation.
So much of what the Republicans are trying to do
is based on potential growth and building growth in the country,
and and the growth is what they believe is going
to ultimately reduce the death, the deficit, and the debt.
And it's it's a combined game, right, It's not just
the legislation, it's what the legislation will cause in terms
of growth in the country that will ultimately lead in
more into more revenues. And I don't know if Elon
is thinking of that whole picture. I know that that's
what Scott Bessant's point is, and we'll hear from him
in just a bit, but that makes sense to me
that he's looking at the legislation and thinks, yep, this
just raises everything this sucks. This is more spending, more spending,
but he's not thinking about the whole equation, right, I
don't know, And.
Speaker 1: I get that because I wouldn't care about that either.
I get it. I totally get it. But I would
need somebody like you to say you're not thinking about
the big picture, Daisy, calm down. I need. I'd need
Texas Tickler to say, calm down, Daisy, and then I'd
be like, all right, tell me, tell me more, because
I just would. I would think linear like him too.
I'd be irritated about this whole thing. So, I mean,
I get both sides. I really do out both sides here.
Speaker 2: Yeah, same representative Scott Perry said, so Elon Musk is
right to call out House leadership. I wish I had
a nickel for every time the Freedom Caucus sounded the
alarm and nobody listened, only to find out the hard.
Speaker 1: Way we were right all along.
Speaker 2: We expect massive improvements from the Senate before it gets
back to the House. So I mean, yeah, that's great, Right,
there's still work to be done on the actual legislation
before it gets to Trump's desk. Eric Erickson also very
negative about this. He said everyone who ever gets involved
with the GOP winds up disillusioned. Welcome Elon Musk to
that party.
Speaker 1: I also kind of understand that a little bit.
Speaker 2: Yeah, totally got to the party thing, right, Peter Deucy.
Elon's tweet came out basically during the presser with Caroline Lovett,
and so Peter Deucy said, hot off the presses. How
mad do you think Trump is going to be about this?
Here is that exchange and something that.
Speaker 18: Just frosus Caroline? How mad do you think President Trump
is going to be when he finds out that? Elon
Musk said, I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore.
At this massive, outrageous, pork filled congressional spending bill is
a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it.
You know you did wrong, you know it.
Speaker 15: Look, the President already knows where Elon Musk stood on
this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is
one big, beautiful bill and he's sticking to it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, it's not gonna it's not going to
change him. It's not like he's going to go He's
not going to listen to to Elon and go Oh
my god, I changed my mind because Elon said so.
He has his approach, Elon has his approach. Their different approaches.
Do I think that it's going to get massaged, Yes,
I do. I think things are being managed and changed,
and that's part of the part of the Dell, part
of the art of the Dell.
Speaker 6: Right.
Speaker 2: Mike Johnson also speaking out to reporters about Elon, and
then he tweeted out this little clip that you're about
to see, and then I'll have you read the details
of what he said about the Big Beautiful Bill. But
here's just a quick clip of what he said about Elon.
Speaker 20: Let me say this, it's it's very disappointed.
Speaker 3: Okay.
Speaker 20: I've come to consider Elon a good friend. He's obviously
a very intelligent person, and he's done a lot of
great work. With all due respect, my friend Elon is
terribly wrong about the one Big Beautiful Bill.
Speaker 1: So here's what he said in detail. Okay, I count
Elon Musk as a good friend, and Congressional Republicans appreciate
everything he has done put a spotlight on waste fraud
and abuse in government. Now that DOSE has identified wastefile spending,
it is being quantified by the administration and codified by
Congress via the resisions process and appropriations process. Yeah, we hope. So,
with all due respect, Elon is simply wrong about the
One Big Beautiful Bill. Our legislation comprehensively delivers on every
major campaign promise and the America First Agenda while also
securing historic savings of more than one point six trillion dollars.
It's going to keep our border secure, provide historic tax
relief for hardworking Americans, unleash American energy dominance, reduce spending,
and restore peace through strength. Congress is working hard to
get this to President Trump's desk by July fourth, so
we can deliver on the mandate that the American people
gave us. Now, I appreciate everything that was said there,
except for like the beginning part where he's like, we
appreciate what Elon Musk has done to put a spotlight
on this stuff. Okay, it's more than just a spotlight.
Y'all need to take that, and you need to make
sure that you codify it, and like, like, I need
to just see more of a bow on top of
that in the first three paragraphs, and then I would
have felt a little bit better about that. I appreciate it.
Speaker 2: But the second the second paragraph doesn't do it for you.
Speaker 1: I mean it's I guess it's like it's I feel
like there needed to be more what's the like finality
to that, Like you needed to be like, we're absolutely
going to do this, like he did this out of
the votes.
Speaker 2: It's absolutely without question happening without a question.
Speaker 1: We're going to do this, like that is a mandate.
We're going to do this. Of course it's going to
get done. It just seemed a little like, I mean,
it's going to go through a process.
Speaker 2: A little soft, a little too soft.
Speaker 1: Yeah, because again I want it to be freaking done,
Like there's that's my money. And like somebody said in here,
I'm sorry, I didn't catch your name, it's very easy
for these jackals. You didn't say jackals. I'm adding that paraphrasing,
it's very easy for these jack holes to spend our money.
It's always easier to spend somebody else's money, right, always easier.
So that this is something that this time around, in
this administration, they got to learn that that it's stop
spending our money, and it needs to become very uncomfortable
for them to do. So, we have to make it
very uncomfortable for these people to spend our money. And
Elon started making strides in that, and.
Speaker 2: That's why I love him, I know, I mean, and
I think Trump does too. I don't think anything has
happened to put a rift in their relationship at all.
And I starting together in the Oval Office.
Speaker 1: You don't think Elon.
Speaker 2: You think Elon kept out a seat grip from champ
And just to get the White House Golden key.
Speaker 1: No, and I didn't know that. They were open with
each other. And there's good stuff in this bill. There's
really good stuff in it. There is stuff that is
America first, which is great. I just hate that all
of it has to be put. I hate that there
has to be pork in these bills. I hate it.
Maybe we can start moving forward to change that too,
So we'll see how you get pork.
Speaker 2: That is something that you can also get from Omaha
Steaks dot com.
Speaker 1: Did you know that?
Speaker 2: And they also the pork chops are like this fat
you guys, really really good, you guys. They're so fat,
and then they can come with bacon around them.
Speaker 1: So much pork, and it's her favorite. My mother in
law loves Omaha steaks pork chops. We'd get them.
Speaker 2: Oh they're so good, They're just so fat, like they're
just oh my god. That's just one of the things
that you could build into a custom package of young
for the dad in your life. For father, could not
be a better Father's Day gift.
Speaker 1: You combine it with the chef.
Speaker 2: IQ and your set, you've got like the best barbecue
set up ever. You can always do the fallback, of
course of steaks, whether they're bacon wrapped filets, whether they're
the surloins, or maybe you want to just do burgers
and dogs. I mean, that's that's always fun. That's always
a slam dunk. And now they've got the smash burgers,
which are so freakin' yummy. So anything that you want,
whether it's chicken, pork, burgers, steaks, seafood, wine, chocolate, baskets, desserts,
sides the side, all the comfort food you can imagine
is yours at Omaha Steaks dot com. And when you
use promo code Chicks at Omaha Steaks dot Com, you're
gonna get an extra thirty five dollars off. Hello, I
don't know this is a slam dunk. It is a
slam dunk, all right, So let's hear from Scott Bessen, who,
of course super smart and so for hockey, I would say,
and he says that, and so you know, you got
to put some stock into what he's saying about the
bill as well. Right, That's why I said, like, there's
so many smart people talking about it that it's hard
for me when I clearly I'm not a person who's
read the bill. Like, let's make that clear. It's hard
to land I have not read it.
Speaker 1: It's but it's hard to land on one particular. Yeah, yeah, it.
Speaker 2: Is because so many people who I have a lot
of respect for are saying very different things. So just
to make sure that we hear all the perspectives here
is Scott Besant.
Speaker 21: I'm a fiscal hawk, but I am also a realist.
And the way to think about this is every three
hundred billion dollars is one percent of GDP. And as
a clip that you just said, you just showed where
I said, we didn't get here in a year. We're
not going to get out of it in a year.
That we have to bring this down gradually because we
want to do two things. We want to cut and
constrain spending, and we want to grow the economy, and
what Senator Paul is asking for or advocating for, I
think could cause a sudden stop in the economy. So
I'm a deficit hawk, but I'm also a realist that
what's important here is our debt to GDP, so that
if we don't grow, then we won't grow the tax space.
And we're not going to grow revenues. We're not going
to grow the economy. So we inherited a mess and
we have to constrain spending, cut spending, and then grow
our way out of this.
Speaker 1: Okay, it's a different perspective. I appreciate that.
Speaker 2: It's like it's like a full picture perspective. Right, it's
not just about the bill, it's about growing.
Speaker 1: And that's not in the language of the bill, you
know what I mean.
Speaker 2: That's what they're hoping will happen as a result of
the actions that the bill would have in it.
Speaker 1: Right, And listen, I have a degree in finance, that
guy does, so okay, well.
Speaker 2: And Stephen Miller also very very smart, probably one of
the smartest people in the administration, also very very much
in favor of.
Speaker 1: The big beautiful bill.
Speaker 2: Katie Pavlich tweeted one of the things that's buried in
it is that it funds the entire border wall, all
the infrastructure, all the technology, to the point that Trump
won't have to ask for funding again during his second
term to get it done. And Stephen said the bill
was designed by President Trump, his loyal aids, and his
closest allies in Congress to deliver fully and enthusiastically on
the explicit promises that.
Speaker 1: He made to the American people. I sure would like
a border wall. I mean, I'm not going to lie.
I would if listen, if I'm going to be broke anyway,
my kids are going to be broken as we'll have
a border wall, and.
Speaker 2: There is more spending on the military, and I want
a strong military, right, It's like, okay.
Speaker 1: Leave that part in about the border wall. Yeah, I
mean the thing I agree like that kind of stuff.
Super stoked about it. It's like, these people are never
going to handle our money as perfectly as I want
them to handle it. But if you put crap like
that in a bill and handle that and make sure
that my family is safe and that my community is safe,
I'm good. Like we're good.
Speaker 2: And I know I mentioned I have not read the bill.
I'm assuming you have not read the bill. The problem
is is that congress members who have voted on the
bill also have not read the frickin' bill, and that
pisses me off. And so when Marjorie Taylor Green brought
up this whole new issue with the bill yesterday, I
was like, why would you admit this out loud? First
of all, but she tweeted about this AI portion of
the bill. She said, full transparency. I didn't know about
this section on pages two hundred and seventy eight of
the big beautiful bill that strips states of the right
to make laws or regulate AI for ten years. I'm
opposed to this. It's a violation of state rights and
I would have voted no if I would have known
this was in there. This needs to be stripped out
in the Senate when it comes back to the House
for approval after Senate changes, I will not vote for
it with this in it. We should be reducing federal
power preserving state power, not the other way around. So,
I mean, this is a whole other issue, right, This
reallys AI.
Speaker 1: She's right, But I mean, your job is to read
the freaking bill exactly, so maybe do you is going on?
Speaker 2: I mean they have the time, okay, the time we involved.
It just makes me so mad.
Speaker 1: This is your actual job, right because they're so busy
on freaking social media making videos of themselves like walking
down the hall look at me and like, yeah, do
your job. Sit in your office that we pay for,
your nice ass office, Sit in it after you go
to the gym that we also pay for, and then
read the bill like you do know before you vote
on it exactly. This is not hard. Gosh, people are juiceless.
Speaker 2: I think Scott Jennings feels kind of the way that
we do, where you know, it's hard not to be
torn because you obviously you listen to Elon and you
think that makes a lot of sense. You listen to
Scott Bessett, that makes a lot of sense. And so
where do we land on this? And Scott Jennings, I thought,
put it very very well.
Speaker 1: Here he is he.
Speaker 11: I wasn't surprised because I had spoken to him about
what was motivating his service in Washington a few weeks
ago and he told me he's here to try to
make America not go bankrupt.
Speaker 1: I mean this is on his mind.
Speaker 11: We have a thirty six trillion dollar debt, and it
should be on all of our minds. So that's number one.
Number two, I don't think that we're done with the
bill yet. I mean, as you know, and as the
reporting says, lots of changes are going to have to
be made in the Senate to get it out of
the Senate, and then those will have to be reconciled.
The reconciliation will have to be reconciled with the House,
and more changes still may come. So you know, I
guess I want multiple things. I want the President to
get his agenda, and the agenda the core part of this,
and the thing that is not negotiable is the extension
and making permanent the tax cuts, investment in border security,
energy deregulation, the biggest welfare reform in recent history. I mean,
these are non negotiable, I think to the President because
it's what he ran on. But the Republicans should listen
here to elon when it comes to the national debt.
We have work to do on this. We have governing
responsibility and maybe it doesn't come in this bill, but
the recisions packages to come, and our other work to
come here. Getting a handle on a thirty six trillion
dollar debt is not going to be easy, but it
is necessary because this is not sustainable.
Speaker 1: It's right, He's right. He has this way. You know, yes,
he does have a way. He just has a way.
Speaker 2: Then, do you remember yesterday when we were talking about
we showed that ridiculous Eric Swalwell clip of him eating
the tacos because this is the Democrats new.
Speaker 1: I'd blocked that out of my Now you put it
right back in the forefront of my mind, and now
I feel sick again.
Speaker 2: So yesterday the DNC decided to serve free tacos outside
the RNC building from twelve to two because they wanted
to have this like Nina, Nina, this stands for Trump
always chickens out.
Speaker 1: This is like everything, okay, and I love that.
Speaker 2: Jd Vance was like, we have the lamest opposition in
American It's so true.
Speaker 1: It's so true. They're serving free tacos. That's what they're doing,
saying the guy who was shot in the head chickens out,
and then they serve free tacos. People are like, okay,
let me have a free tak though happily, who's not
gonna want a free tato on Taco Tuesday. Who's not
gonna want that? I ask you?
Speaker 2: Well, apparently not a lot of people wanted it, because
Nick Sorterer was there and he was like, the Democrats
attempt to mock Trump outside the Republican headquarters with the
taco truck was such a failure that the taco truck
man packed up and left early.
Speaker 1: I would have eaten free takas. And I think their
messages is crap. Their message is stupid. But if somebody
offers me a free taco, I'm sorry. I'm from Texas.
We don't turn down tacos. Am I wrong? Texas people
out there? You know what I'm saying. You don't turn
out a free taco. They must have sucked this Tapas
must have stucked. Maybe they did suck. I don't know.
Speaker 2: But they're like expanding on this whole ridiculous burn. And
now they're calling his supporters takitos, which I personally love.
Speaker 1: They're like, big takitos are really good because they're fried. Yeah,
these are so good. You give me a fried taco.
I'm also your Huckleberry's wrong with these people? Never met
a taco?
Speaker 2: I didn't like, are you guys okay with being called takitos?
Speaker 1: Because I am totally fine with it. I have no problem.
We're precious little takeitos.
Speaker 2: That's just little takeitos.
Speaker 1: Speaking of JD.
Speaker 2: Vance, Laura Lumer apparently had a sit down with him yesterday,
and perhaps I don't know what they were discussing, but
perhaps it has something to do with the fact that
they maybe want her to start vetting potential you know,
asylum seekers or potential migrants into the country.
Speaker 1: Maybe they want her to start vetting their social media.
She wouldn't look at it. He's the research queen, she
really is. I mean, all hail, I'll give her props
for that. Yeah, not much else, but on that major
I'll give her props. Right. And then speaking of JD.
Speaker 2: Vance, and this doesn't have anything to do with like
Takeito's or the Big Beautiful Bill or anything, but he
was recently speaking about the state of universities and colleges
here in America. This was just yesterday, and I thought
he made such a perfect point.
Speaker 1: Here is JD.
Speaker 16: I don't know what the voting you know, the voting
in the twenty twenty four election of Harvard university's faculty
was Okay, my guess is that at least ninety and
probably ninety five percent of them voted for Kamala Hairs, right,
very brilliant Kamala Harris, of course. But you know, if
if you ask yourself a foreign election, a foreign country's election,
you say eighty percent of the people voted for one candidate,
you would say, oh, that's kind of weird, right, that's
like not a super healthy democracy. If you said, oh,
ninety five percent of people voted for one party's candidate,
you would say, that's North Korea, right, that's totalitary. That
is impossible in a true place of free exchange for
that to happen. And so I think the ideological university
of these universities has.
Speaker 17: To get much better.
Speaker 16: And I think that if that got better, if you
actually had a place where people were open to debating
these things and weren't terrified they were going to lose
their job for saying something that was a little bit
outside the Overton window, then I think the science would
get better, the reproducibility would get better, the quality of
the institution would be so much better. And that's what
I want, because we need high quality universities right now.
Speaker 1: The problem is we don't have the perfect analogy. Man,
it is a perfectnallyg and people on the left to
be like.
Speaker 4: But.
Speaker 1: Really, really, you know, universities used to be like that.
I'm old enough to remember when they kind of were
like that. You knew some of your professors were kind
of crazy, you know, commies, and then some of your
professors were on the right. You could just sort of
tell that they were normal, like you could tell. But
now they're all crazy commies, like ninety eight percent of them,
all of them. I don't know how conservatives even make it.
And because I used to teach the college le oh,
there's no way. I don't understand how you could actually
work with all those people, even if you are conservative
and you slip your way in there like you slip
past the goalies and get a job at a university.
How do you survive? How do you do that? You
don't talk to anyone like you just like you go
you teach, You sit in like a janitor's closet, eat
your lunch. They just like go home, like is that
what you? You just hang on.
Speaker 2: To your little red stapler and you stay away from everybody.
Speaker 1: Oh, I can't even imagine what that's like.
Speaker 2: It did give me a little bit of, you know,
a different perspective on the fact that we're so divided
as a country. We constantly talk about how divided we are,
we need a divorce, blah blah blah. But that was
an interesting way to look at it. That really, is
it a sign of a healthy democracy that we have
this fifty to fifty? Would I like it to be
fifty five forty five? Yes, maybe even sixty forty Yes,
I would like that better.
Speaker 1: Okay, fine, it's healthy from a people perspective, but from
a university perspective, not health completely unhealthy.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, the way it is now because it's ninety
five percent.
Speaker 1: The problem is, mock is that those universities educate all
of us, right right, That is a problem. It's a
huge pro problem.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Hakeem Jeffries, the guy who pauses inexplicably for long
periods of time between words.
Speaker 1: He's at it again.
Speaker 2: I completely forgot about Project twenty four, project twenty five?
Speaker 1: Is it twenty five or twenty twenty five project? I
think it's Project twenty twenty five.
Speaker 2: This is how long it's been since we've had to
talk about it because it's not a thing.
Speaker 1: It's not Trump's thing. It's not Trump's it's a thing,
but it's not Trump. Right, yeah, it's not Trump's thing.
Speaker 2: And yet Hakeem Jeffries he wants to make this a
thing again.
Speaker 1: Here here, he just.
Speaker 10: Was Project twenty twenty five is a disaster for the
American people.
Speaker 1: It's a reason, oh my god, why the American people
are running away from Republicans.
Speaker 2: Really, I'm sorry, ok what whatiense like?
Speaker 1: No? What reality is he living in? Is not actual reality?
Speaker 15: No?
Speaker 1: That's wrong. Yeah, that's just wrong. Yeah. Anyway, I'm just
trying to make that a thing. Okay. So just to
give you some I saw this the other day. I
thought this was really interesting. Back in February, Hakim the Pauser,
he talked to John Stewart on John Stewart's podcast, and
Hakeem was complaining and moaning and pitching and about Project
twenty five, right, twenty twenty five, whatever it's called. Okay.
So even though Project twenty five or whatever it is,
is not Trump's baby, I will say that it is
a guidebook for some conservatives out there, and there are
some things in it that I actually agree with. Sure,
there are something's in there that I'm like, that's bogus,
But then there are some things I'm like that I
agree with. The bottom line, though, is that it is
it's a plan, like it's a guide I say, some
sort of a guidebook. It's a roadmap for conservatism in general,
like not all of us, but for at least some conservatives.
And this is what I thought was really interesting. John
Stewart asked him, He's like, what is liberals? And he
couldn't answer it. And what I thought was so interesting
about that discussion is that they don't have anything like
at least we have people who are out there and
think tanks and whatever who are talking about issues and
we're writing it down and we're providing roadmaps. They may
not be perfect, but at least they're roadmaps.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 1: The Democrats, all they have.
Speaker 2: Is orange me and the ad right. They just have
the word Trump with a big line through it. That's
their entire policy.
Speaker 1: They're just obstructionists. They're just like all they want to
do is combat and just bitch and moan and complain
about that's all they want to do. They don't have
they don't have solutions for anything. Nothing, so he had
he couldn't answer. He couldn't answer John Stewart, and John
Stewart was like, well, I probably shouldn't have asked no question,
you know what I mean? It was it was an
uncomfortable interview. I remember watching.
Speaker 2: Maybe he just was pausing for so long that they
just went to the next question.
Speaker 9: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I mean. What I took away from that, and that
was in February. What I took away from that is
that these are not serious people. They're not They're not
serious adults with solutions to provide for the American people.
We are. So there's that, yeap, That is a that
is a very very interesting point.
Speaker 2: In case you're wondering how negotiations are going between President
Trump and China at President G on the tariffs, it
doesn't sound like it's going so great. This is what
Trump posted yesterday on True Social He said, I like
President G of China, always have, always will. But he
is very tough and extremely hard to make a deal.
Speaker 1: With China sucks trying to can suck it. So that's
where that is. I just I could never do that.
He's sick. I mean, he is exemplary at what he
does because I could never go in with China and
be like, let's make a deal. I'd be like, f you, China.
You got people in here stealing our stuff, right, Like, yes,
I mean stuff yesterday that came out about the fungus
that they were gonna unleash.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, we'll get to you too, because that's an
unbelievable story.
Speaker 1: Can suck it? All the stuff with COVID, all that
I get so irritated, like they've never been held accountable
for the crap that they've unleashed on the world.
Speaker 2: And speaking of COVID and China, I thought this was
just a really I don't know, there was something very reassuring,
and I think it should be reassuring for everybody, no
matter what political side of the aisle you're on. This
tweet from uh HHS Secretary now RFK Junior, there's you know,
this new strain of COVID, right, and he said, I
want to address those of you who have anxieties about
the FDA's limited approval of a new mr NA COVID
vaccine for high risk populations. Maderna has agreed to a
true placebo controlled trial of the new vaccine, which is
similar to the existing mRNA vaccine but uses a smaller protein.
The FDA will monitor and collect data throughout the trial
for every adverse outcome, not just a table list of
expected outcomes.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 2: Yes, DA will scrutinize every aspect of the trial. We
will deliver on our promise to use gold standard science
and common sense. Who can argue with that? Who wants
to like fight that?
Speaker 1: Did say we don't want to do an actual placebo
controlled trial, which is what we've done with every other
thing ever. I mean, this is it takes forever to
get a drug to go through and be Sometimes it
takes twenty years for that for the development life cycle
of a drug to go all the way through.
Speaker 2: It takes forever.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but with this one, nah, I mean we don't care.
Just use people. It's the guinea pigs. We don't care.
I mean, give me a break. Okay. If people do
argue it, it's it's liberals. It's the same people who
are like, I'm still masking up in my car.
Speaker 2: Well, and it's just I mean, I don't know because
the people who are like Kennedy's, you know, he's a
nightmare and he doesn't know anything about anything. When it
comes to science. He is the one that wants actual
testing and care put into these vaccines before they get released.
And so the fact that he's explaining, we're going to
be looking at this every step of the way, and
we're demanding a placebo controlled trial. It's not just going
to be handed out, you know what I mean, But
it's going to go through stringent testing.
Speaker 1: Everybody should be okay with that. Yeah, and everybody should,
but everybody should also be okay with them wanting to
take poison at a kid's cereal and they're like, well,
I want poison in my kid's cereal. Yeah, I mean
he's friends with Trump, so put that red dye back
in my kids. I mean, come on, it's good.
Speaker 9: There.
Speaker 1: It goes back to the whole Hakeem Jeffreys thing. If
they are just substructing, they just want to say whatever
these people say, we want the opposite. You want poison
in your food, you're a freaking idiot.
Speaker 2: Go ahead and add it at home, add red dye
to your candy or whatever.
Speaker 1: By all means a great country.
Speaker 2: Yeah, uh, you mentioned what happened with China yesterday. This
is absolutely horrifying. But basically, according to ABC News, two
Chinese nationals have been charged with allegedly smuggling into the
United States a fungus, which scientific literature classifies as a
potential agro terrorism weapon, and as Nicole Safire said, it's
a known agro terrorism threat. This fungus can devastate crops,
those serious risks to our food supply and economy. Agrosecurity
is national security. We have to strengthen biothreat detection and
take deliberate acts like this as seriously as any other
form of sabotage.
Speaker 1: And one worked at the University of Michigan, going back
to the school talk that we had, Yeah, what are
we doing? What are we doing? Can you imagine sitting
in that broad class with a dudes class, being a
student and being like, wait, are you the person that
was wanting to poison me and my country? What in
the actual hell?
Speaker 2: And then raise your hand if your surprised, because this
is like, this is what.
Speaker 1: Of course there's going to.
Speaker 2: Be CCP, you know, embedded people that are going to
want to come to our universities and do harm. Why
are we not this This is the kind of vetting
that Laura Lumer needs to do totally and at once.
Speaker 1: All the Democrats and your social media going, but they
need due process. I mean, you don't know.
Speaker 2: Okay, yesterday, I know we played some clips earlier of
Caroline Lovet's presser.
Speaker 1: But there was another question that.
Speaker 2: She took from Peter Deucy, specifically about the auto pen,
because apparently the pardons that Biden gave to his family
were all with the autopen except for Hunters, right, And
so he he wanted to see what the White House
was doing with that information. And here is that exchange, Gee.
Speaker 19: Knory sixth Committee, Right.
Speaker 22: Most of the big ones had the same, very neat signature.
We would expect that probably to be the auto pen.
There is one that looks different. It looks authentic. In fact,
if you look at the last name, it almost looks
like the president was having a hard time spelling his
last name.
Speaker 19: There is this White House.
Speaker 22: Of the opinion that the only part of the account
is one that the presidents signed himself.
Speaker 1: Very interesting, very interesting props.
Speaker 15: If you want to bring them to my office later
so I can take a closer look, I would like
to do that. The President is making a good point
when he discusses the usage of the autopen. Who was
running the country for the past four years. Perhaps those
documents were signed with the autopen, something that I believe
the Department of Justice is looking into. As you saw
Ed Martin made an announcement at the Department of Justice
this morning to launch an investigation because as the American
people deserve answers.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I want to if he didn't sign those papers,
who did, I, as an American tax paying citizen, want
to know who was signing those papers. Biggest scandal in
American history. You're the Watergate. I can let it go. No,
don't let it go. I'm serious. I'm going to be
such a freaking Karen about that. Sorry to any of
the Karens, but I'm going to be such caring about it,
like I'm not letting it go. I'm not. We can't
let it go.
Speaker 2: You guys know, it is the biggest scandal in the
history of this country, bar none.
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 2: Interesting stat that came out yesterday and these apparently were
self reported, but a bunch of people were asked, hey,
how would you describe your mental health?
Speaker 1: Are you well? Are you unwell?
Speaker 2: And the stats were fascinating but not.
Speaker 1: At all surprising.
Speaker 2: Okay, so you can see from this chart and then
we'll let we'll hear what Dana Prino was saying with
Joe Kanca. But essentially, if you're the liberals said they
classified themselves having excellent mental health only twenty percent of
the time poor mental health. Forty five percent of liberals
said they had poor mental health. With conservatives, it was
completely backwards. Conservatives fifty one percent said they have excellent
mental health and only nineteen percent said that they had
poor mental health. So interesting stat here is Dana and
Joe Kanca to discuss.
Speaker 1: Political views fifty one to forty five percent when it
comes to excellent versus poor. And I don't think the
Democrats would have expected that.
Speaker 19: I don't know, man, I.
Speaker 1: Didn't need a poll to know they were on. Well,
just drive around mask in their car and you know
who they're voting for, and you know they're not. Okay,
It's so true, right, so true. You didn't need a poll.
You just look around, just use your eyeballs. You can
see the people are freaking mental. Yeah, and we're just
I think generally we're just happier. We're just happy, happier
for sure. Yeah, no matter who the president is, no
matter what's happening I think just in general, we're happier.
And you know, I don't know what we can attribute
that to. I think I think a lot of people,
if you look at socials and stuff like that, when
this came out yesterday, people will say the right is
more religious, you know, we actually have faith, where I don't.
Maybe that's part of it. I don't know. I think
it's just we're just happier, more common sense driven people.
Speaker 2: We love our fa're not constantly looking to be victimized
or outraged, right, So, I mean, I guess if you're
the kind of person that constantly wants to figure out
how am I oppressed today, You're naturally.
Speaker 1: Going to be negative.
Speaker 2: You're going to be unhappy, You're going to be always
looking for ways that you are a.
Speaker 1: Victim, and we just don't live that way. If you're
fixated on the negative, you will be negative. You're going
to have problems. Totally agree.
Speaker 2: Yeah, speaking of negative people, Tara Palmer. Of course we've
played some clips from her podcast before, but our BFFs.
Speaker 1: Jenny also went onto her podcast. And I'm not going
to say that I'm jealous. You're a little jealous. It's okay.
Scott you're watching, it's not okay, it's not immediately.
Speaker 2: I haven't asked him yet, but I plan to. I
probably will message him and just say, you had more fun.
Speaker 1: With us, right because I went on our show, you
need to come back, come back on our show. And
then because she is you know, she's she's straight lighted.
She like, no, it's not that.
Speaker 2: I mean, I think you know, she can. I think
she can ham it up a little bit. But she's
lefty and so that.
Speaker 1: Can't be fun, you know what I mean, that's not fun.
Speaker 2: No, So Vince Colignys, who replaced I hope I'm saying
his name right. I have no idea if I am.
But Vince on Rubble, who replaced Dan Bongino. He basically
took over Dan Bongino's podcast. He showed a clip of
Scott Jennings on Tara's show, and uh, it's an interesting clip.
Let's just say that and we'll let Vince explain.
Speaker 13: A podcaster journalist lady called Tara Paul Mary. She was
interviewing Scott Jennings of CNN fame, and this is the
conversation they had. She said, Oh, it's it's both sides
that are being violent right now, And Scott said, what.
Speaker 1: Left has a problem with violence? It is in his
heart right now. I don't think it is only the left.
Speaker 23: I mean you have literally seen people on both sides
committing violence. I think the problem is not the left.
I think it is the extreme on both sides of
the party.
Speaker 1: But why is it happening? Why do why do late
night comedians go on TV and.
Speaker 11: Encourage or coddle or give lip service to this, this
vandalism of what went on with Tesla dealerships and so on.
Speaker 1: Why are there so many prominent people. I'm not for vandalism,
but like it's.
Speaker 11: More than that they fire bomb these things, like it's
it's but it's dangerous.
Speaker 1: But it's happening on both sides.
Speaker 11: One person on the right is committing violence today.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh.
Speaker 23: Well, first of all, when you're in power, you don't
tend to be the ones that are doing that.
Speaker 2: But I think after they what the hell.
Speaker 13: By the way, in Pennsylvania, who's the governor of Pennsylvania
right now, Josh Shapiro, What party is Josh Shapiro in?
He's a Democrat.
Speaker 1: Oh so he's in charge.
Speaker 13: He's the guy in power, right now who attacked his house?
Who fire bombed the governor's mansion? That was a lefty
who did that?
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's inconvenient for her. She didn't answer that question.
I'm assuming right she couldn't answer.
Speaker 2: I mean she can't because she you know what she
tried to do January sixth, Like they ended up money
into it about January sixth, and I was like, poor Scott,
why did you go on the show?
Speaker 1: Just come back on our show. Don't be on that show.
But yeah, exactly, we could be talking about Tiffany Gimez.
You know important, come on, come on our show, Scott,
way better. You should be your time, way better.
Speaker 2: And just you know, I thought that this was an
interesting little clip of some idiot in Minnesota who was
being asked, uh, well, who was being told that Trump
stopped allowing illegals to have covered healthcare? And this woman
was like, oh, yeah, that's like so awful that he
did that, And then she was told actually it was
Tim Walls and then watch how her position changes.
Speaker 15: Certainly caught taxpayer funded healthcare for illegal immigrants.
Speaker 1: What's your take on that? It's just irresponsible. I think
that's wrong.
Speaker 15: What if I told you that that's actually Governor Walls
who recently did that.
Speaker 1: I saw the Governor Walls had to do some compromising.
Oh I didn't hear that. That's a matter of the budget.
I heard that he has to do that. He has
to do it, you guys, he has to. It's different,
don't you see? This is it goes back to the hole.
They're mentally, they're deranged. These people are deranged, you guys.
This is why they're those broads are the most unhappy.
They're just miserable. Look at them, and they're trying. They're
the ones who know they are the one.
Speaker 2: I mean, that is just proof right there that leftist
policy is simply anti Trump. There is no policy and
absolutely to be anti Trump on every issue one hundred percent.
Speaker 1: One hundred percent. That is insane. And you know what,
illegal should be getting healthcare? Hello, this is not hard. No,
it's not hard. If you think they should be getting
health care, then you paid for it Bach.
Speaker 2: Good lord redonculous. Pierce Morgan really pissed me off yesterday
because he had Dave Smith and Natasha Hasdorf on his
show to talk about Gaza and Israel, and Dave Smith
and Pierce are very very like minded about that issue.
Pierce did not give Natasha even a second to get
her point across. It was such a just they both
ganged up on her so awfully, and it just made
me sick to my stomach. However, all that said, Pierce
is right on some issues, so.
Speaker 1: As much as he drives me crazy.
Speaker 2: He's like Bill Maher to me, where he'll be so
right on some things and then so wrong on other
things that it just I can't make my brain understand them.
On issues of trans people in sports, Pierce is one
hundred percent on the right side of that argument.
Speaker 1: And he had on Tommy Laren.
Speaker 2: Some doctor whose name I don't know, and a trans
pickleball player on the show No Joke to talk about
this whole issue, and it was it starts with Tommy,
but it ends with Pierce, and he gives it to
this pickleballer.
Speaker 1: It really really good.
Speaker 24: It really burns my ass when I hear people say, oh,
it's just a few examples. Those girls can just get
over it. How about the one trans person. How about
they get over it and compete against the boys.
Speaker 1: How about that? Yeah, you know you talk about separate
divisions for trans people. Yes, Okay, well, it's pretty split
down the middle between people who support trans people and
people who do not. And opportunity. You have to create
a league where trans people aren't allowed, go for it,
and there's an opportunity to create.
Speaker 8: I think you should in your case. I think in
your case you should either compete against male pickleball players
or compete or complete.
Speaker 1: You're not everybody, or you compete. You agree that there
are many who agree with you, and there are many
who agree with me that there is no threat. Don't
know why you want to be under women, Sarah.
Speaker 8: Why do you want to be a cheat? Why do
you want to be a cheat? That's what you're doing.
Speaker 1: You're cheating, cheating.
Speaker 8: Yes, it's really it really isn't It cuts to the
heart of the debate. It is cheating. It is knowingly
using a superior biology from birth to beat women who
are born with female bodies. It is cheating. It's time
to call it out for what it is. And Dr Webberly,
you don't think that this is about science. Its breathtaking
to me, breathtaking. Of course, it's about human being.
Speaker 12: And the doctor.
Speaker 1: I'm a human being.
Speaker 8: I'm a compassionate paston.
Speaker 1: What's I got to do with it?
Speaker 8: Aren't you compassionate to women who are losing gold medals?
Speaker 2: To me?
Speaker 1: Quite right, I'm not a scientist. You're not a woman either,
here's a news flash. Yeah, and you are a cheater.
You are, in fact a cheater. They can't answer that question.
They just can't. They're cheaters. And why they never win
that way? One because they suck, because they're subpar humans. Honestly,
you're doing this. Listen, there are transgenders out out there
that are decent people, but the ones who do this
are not decent people. Not They're cheating, and so they
need to answer for that. I think that's a great question.
And when they can't answer that question, why not? Why
do you want to cheat so bad? Why do you
want to do that? You do not see women going
into men's sports and dominating You don't see that? Why
do you not see that?
Speaker 17: You guys?
Speaker 1: Let me see. I'll wait over here. What's the answer?
Speaker 4: Gee?
Speaker 1: I wonder why this isn't no?
Speaker 2: Yeah on that issue, Pierce is always spot on.
Speaker 1: On most others. I just want to punch them in
the face, not that I ever would. I do not
kill violence on this show. We do not condone violence.
Speaker 2: Except maybe to these people that you're about to see next.
I don't know where what city this is. It could
literally be anywhere. But remember how we talked yesterday about
the fact that Target has decided instead of like, you know,
assaulting everyone's eyeballs with like rainbow shit in their stores,
they've decided to be more pro America in honor of
our Independence Day coming up, instead of all this pride nonsense.
So there are now protesters that are doing this kind
of stuff inside Target.
Speaker 1: Shame on Target. Oh my gun, I'd be like, you
get out of my way. I get a look at
these freaks. Honestly, look at them, right, what is this?
They're exactly as you'd expect. This is the left, you guys,
this is these are democrats. Oh my god. Target still
has pride merch. It's just transgendery. Really, I can't keep
track of all the sex flags. I can't, but there's
like there are transgender there's like a transgendery section. It's
not really like rainbow, but it's like the pastel rainbow.
I don't even know what that means, because I don't
give a shit what it means. But it's but and
then Walmart did the member They did the homo estace
shirts which were just a complete veil. Yes that was Walmart. Okay,
Walmart did the homo esta shirts. Why why are you
doing that? And then Lesbian remember the Yes, that's what
I forget, right, the veterans. The veterans get a day
and they get a month, you guys, makes all well,
And it's not even that they're protesting.
Speaker 2: Some of these people are actually saying that the lack
of merch means that we are now in a fascistie.
Speaker 1: Yes, okay, so I just you can't make this up.
Just take it straight from this weirdo's mouth.
Speaker 12: First day of Pride month. But honestly, it is so
telling and very terrifying of where we're at politically right
now that no brands have really changed their logo to
include their marketing towards queer people like they usually do
every single year, And it really is telling of how
we are falling into fascism so quickly, and it is terriforing.
Speaker 1: It is it's just terrifying. You know what he should do?
I'm assuming that was a he.
Speaker 3: She.
Speaker 1: I think they don't want to be you know what
it should do. It should just go to Gaza. It
should go there because it's less fascist. I mean, it's
so fascist here. We should all crowd fun and just
send that individual to Gaza and see I would very
much like that. How embraced it is in Gaza. Oh
please please go report back. Yeah, we'll be waiting a while.
We will be waiting quite a while for the report.
Speaker 2: The next person you're about to see, you know, when
you first see her, you're going to be like, oh boy,
what does this person have to say? But I promise
you you're gonna end up liking it. I don't know
if this woman is a lesbian or not. I'm just
going to go out on a limb and assume Aaron
Krieger back me up, my Datar feel like my Gaitar
is on point on this one.
Speaker 1: But her message is awesome. Take a listen.
Speaker 5: I was misgendered yesterday. A little girl at the mall,
she was maybe five years old, sitting in a wagon,
kept staring at me. So I made eye contact and
she said, are you a girl or a boy? Her
mom started to go, oh my god, h we accept everyone.
That's so rude. You can't say that, and I laughed,
and I bent down on her level and I said,
that's okay. It's confusing sometimes I'm a girl. I just
really like boys' clothes. They're pretty comfy. She got all
excited and she said I'm a girl too, and I
gave her a high five. I said, isn't it so great.
Speaker 1: Being a girl?
Speaker 5: I love being a girl. She said, yeah, that's my brother.
He's a brother because he's a boy. So I said,
you're right. Brothers are boys and sisters are girls. There's
only boys and girls. If you're born a girl, you're
a girl. I was born a girl. I can almost
see the release of error coming from her mother's body
and just the ultimate sigh of relief that I wasn't
gonna be indoctrinating her child or teaching her child something
that maybe she didn't want.
Speaker 1: Her to know.
Speaker 5: I continue to talk to the little girl about her
brother and her very cute dog, who was also a girl.
I said, I hope you have a great day, and
I went about my business. That is how you address
gender to children, you don't. That is how you empower
little girls and let them know that it's okay to
be a girl who dresses however you want without having
to change your gender. That is how you avoid confusing children,
especially children that aren't your own, and projecting your bullshit
on them because you might be offended that they use
the wrong pronoun.
Speaker 1: Old school lesbians, man, right, Yes, this is the thing
with gen X. It's like, I don't even know what
generation she's in, but that's what we're used to, is
the old school, the old school gays. Bring it back,
you know you've been having for so long, Bring them back.
We went the old school gays back, because that's exactly right,
That is sensible, right, Yeah, you think my gator was
correct though, I mean like she's probably a lesbian. I
feel like like she probably likes one. He probably does
power to her. I think that's absolutely yeah, Absolutely you
do you girlfriend? Absolutely all right. We've got some thank yous.
Speaker 2: One from Kelly Wiseman, who said dad joke Wednesday, how
do chickens bake a cake from scratch? Also, please pray
for my husband Dave. He has hand surgery tomorrow. My
favorite dad joke giver XO XO. Jerks Dixie Bama said
chef iq probes are the best. My husband loves them.
He can smoke a meat loaf while enjoying the pool.
Got them for him for Christmas.
Speaker 1: Get them? Love you jerks, love that testimonial. Thank you everybody.
Oh it's fantastic.
Speaker 2: Yeah, use code chicks at chef iq dot com.
Speaker 1: That is awesome.
Speaker 2: And then from the ballpit crew, we had e grab four.
This was in response to the Jamie Raskin clip that
we played the other day. Says not to mention Colorado
recently passed some of the most restrictive two A gun laws,
so Ratskin needs to shove off.
Speaker 1: It's true, you can you can barely have. Yeah, the
gun laws are really ridiculous in Colorado. Randy Craig weird day. First,
I find a hat full of money that I'm chased
by an angry guy with a guitar from Dad Club.
By the way, love your hair today, chicks, what I
don't care. Guy was probably playing guitar with the you know,
with the hat and if people put money in it
and then he finds it, he took the money from
the guy that was playing the guitar.
Speaker 2: Okay, I'm sorry, I was really slow on the uptake
for that, but thank you for the compliment.
Speaker 1: Was so good.
Speaker 5: She needs.
Speaker 1: She needs to like make it like it. She told
me this morning, She's like, quit straightening your hair. I said, okay,
I'll stop training it. You guys, I have so good totally.
I'm trailer hair. Thank you. No, I love it. Kristin Thompson.
What country's capital is the fastest growing? Ireland? Every day?
It's Dublin. I see what you did with that one.
I see what you did, Leah Shallack. Gay people have
full rights in Israel. There are no prohibitions against them
in the IDF. Tel Aviv hosts the only pride parade
in the Middle East. A trans woman represented Israel Eurovision
in nineteen ninety eight. There you go, do not, in
fact throw them off buildings. There you go, Brian Brumley.
I heard that a sorcerer smashed their laptop. Apparently the
spell check stopped working. Please make my money disappear. There
you go. Jose Rodriguez. Morning from Texas, y'all. What do
you call an Italian hooker? A prostitute? Like my money?
I love it? Jose Rodriguez Again, what did the end
lot of say to the burrito when they disagreed about
which was better? Let's talko about it? Just take my
DeNiro about it, get it. Get Kelly j. Finding the
chicks during COVID saved my mental health. Found my peeps.
Oh that's so sweet. I love that. Love our community.
Aaron Krieger. I found that chick on TikTok yesterday and
want to be your best friend. Also, I would like
to celebrate Pride with a gay themed dad joke. What
do gay horses eat? Hey? Take my old school gay money.
Thank you, Aaron, I love it. Okay, we got one more.
Teresa Leggett. I really wish they would only do single
issue bills. I agree, it'd be great. It would be
great if we could get to that point. Maybe in
this administration we can actually move towards that too. It's
like I feel like we're not I want to say
baby steps, but I feel like we've actually taken toddler steps,
not just baby steps, but toddler steps. In this administration,
We're we're doing bigger steps, I think, towards improvement, you know,
but hopefully we'll get there. Hopefully. You guys, it's Wednesday,
hep Day. Hope everybody has big plans, wonderful things going
on today.
Speaker 2: Little Takeito's the taketo's out there.
Speaker 1: Go have a taketo. We will talk to you tomorrow.
Speaker 2: Bye, everybody,