Speaker 1: I think it's just going to get weirder and weirder
Speaker 1: and weirder, and finally it's going to be so weird
Speaker 1: that people are going to have to talk about how
Speaker 1: weird it is. Eventually people are going to say, what
Speaker 1: the hell is going on? It's not enough to say
Speaker 1: it's nuts. You have to explain why it's so nuts.
Speaker 1: The invention of artificial life, the cloning of human beings,
Speaker 1: possible contact with extraterrestrials, the systems which are in place
Speaker 1: to keep the world saying are in utterly inadequate to
Speaker 1: the forces that have been unleashed.
Speaker 2: Welcome back to Forbidden Knowledge News. I'm your host Chris Matthew.
Speaker 2: Today my guest is Raven Keefer. First, I want to
Speaker 2: remind you all to join us September twelfth through fourteenth
Speaker 2: for our annual Forbidden Gathering in Fort Collins, Colorado. We
Speaker 2: will once again be having a day celebration and gathering
Speaker 2: of freethinkers, truth and high strangeness seekers. We'll be having celebrations, food, podcast,
Speaker 2: as well as a hike through the North Colorado Mountains.
Speaker 2: If you would like to attend, please RSVP two Forbidden
Speaker 2: Knowledge News at gmail dot com with Subject Gathering for
Speaker 2: more details and to reserve your place at the event.
Speaker 2: It is completely free to attend, but it will be
Speaker 2: a potluck event, so we request that each party attending
Speaker 2: bring food or drink or other party supplies to contribute.
Speaker 2: We hope to see you all there September twelfth through
Speaker 2: fourteenth in Fort Collins, Colorado Again RSVP two Forbidden Knowledgeews
Speaker 2: at gmail dot com with Subject Gathering. Also, if you're
Speaker 2: ready to start your microdosing journey with the highest quality
Speaker 2: ingredients available, check out Brain Supreme. Use the link, write
Speaker 2: in the description and you'll get fifteen percent off your orders,
Speaker 2: so you can start your microdosing journey with Brain Supreme
Speaker 2: right now. We're booking guests for August. If you have
Speaker 2: suggestions or you'd like to be a guest, email me
Speaker 2: Forbidden Knowledgenews at gmail dot com. Today, I want to
Speaker 2: welcome back to the show. Raven Keefer. He is a
Speaker 2: researcher an expose writer from mid nineteen eighties through today.
Speaker 2: He currently has over twenty three books in print and
Speaker 2: has been a lifetime researcher that contributes to numerous content
Speaker 2: creators and independent reporters. Raven welcome back. How you doing.
Speaker 3: I am doing fantastic. Man, I'm always glad to be
Speaker 3: on here. Like I said, folks, he and I talked
Speaker 3: before we start. I always tell you all this, and
Speaker 3: I sent him in an email yesterday I said, Man,
Speaker 3: if you need me, just talk her.
Speaker 4: I like being on your show.
Speaker 2: That's like I was telling you, I'm taking an emergency
Speaker 2: camping trip to get my mind right. I'll be gone
Speaker 2: for a few days. This episode will be coming out
Speaker 2: while I'm gone, and I very much appreciate you stepping
Speaker 2: in there as as usual, and the conversations are always
Speaker 2: fantastic and mind blowing, and today will not be any different.
Speaker 2: You are sharing with me some of the happenings that
Speaker 2: we're going to be going over today with a new
Speaker 2: CDC test situation, just like the Event two one scenario
Speaker 2: that they're monkeying around with again. So we'll find out
Speaker 2: about that and see what other rabbit holes we can
Speaker 2: jump into. I know you'd mentioned something about AI and
Speaker 2: the Singularity, which of course we've been getting into a
Speaker 2: lot today because that shit's just getting crazy. So let's
Speaker 2: talk about this new simulated event. Tell us about it.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, they just ran a simulated event and
Speaker 3: the data fort just got released. And here's the curious
Speaker 3: part about it, and so we'll just start here. It
Speaker 3: was in the exercise and if folks, if you don't
Speaker 3: remember IF two one, you might want to go look
Speaker 3: at it. Send I'll send Chris the link to the
Speaker 3: tabletop exercise draft that they got so that he can
Speaker 3: post it for you.
Speaker 4: But they had an exercise the.
Speaker 3: Same old people, same old people involved, W E, F,
Speaker 3: W H O, CDC. They even had some people from
Speaker 3: the FDA with them, which was weird, but you know
Speaker 3: that makes sense because a lot of the people at
Speaker 3: the United States FDA are part of the pharmaceutical industry.
Speaker 3: So they had this exercise and supposedly NIPA N I
Speaker 3: P A H all caps, y'all. And if you're looking
Speaker 3: for the actual code that they use, it's in capital
Speaker 3: in small I V N I V and then there's
Speaker 3: a B. Well I'm sorry, there's a BD which is Bangladesh,
Speaker 3: M which is Malaysia, and I which is India. So
Speaker 3: I'm just trying to let you all know what to
Speaker 3: look for. But anyway, so supposedly it was dropped on
Speaker 3: the United States.
Speaker 2: Hey, Raven you're are you still there?
Speaker 4: Hello, gestational period you have?
Speaker 2: You broke up there for like I don't know about
Speaker 2: thirty seconds or so.
Speaker 3: Ah man, yeah, okay, so the gestation period is go
Speaker 3: ahead and.
Speaker 2: Start over, because I think we missed the whole explanation
Speaker 2: of the simulation. And again, this is a simulated event.
Speaker 2: This didn't actually happen, wink wink. But this is what
Speaker 2: they were talking about.
Speaker 3: Well, what they do is they do a tabletop exercise,
Speaker 3: just like us playing Dungeons and Dragons. I mean, it's
Speaker 3: basically the same principle. How many are you going to
Speaker 3: kill in this game?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 3: Anyway, So what they did is is they do this
Speaker 3: tabletop exercise where supposedly NEPA was set loose in the
Speaker 3: United States in Western Europe sometime in June to take
Speaker 3: advantage of the gestational period being around fourteen to twenty
Speaker 3: one days. That way, on July fourth, when everybody in
Speaker 3: the United States gathered up for the weekend, it would
Speaker 3: spread and according to their exercise, two hundred and eighty
Speaker 3: thousand people in the United States died. Now that's just outright,
Speaker 3: that's the initial.
Speaker 2: I want everyone listening to go to Google to the
Speaker 2: news and just type in Nipa, Nipah and see how
Speaker 2: many new stories are just popping up just this morning.
Speaker 2: And I'm sure this is going to be the new trend.
Speaker 3: Well, I looked when I did my podcast yesterday, so folks,
Speaker 3: you can check out my podcast too for a lot
Speaker 3: more details. But the thing about it is, what I
Speaker 3: saw was this exercise where they're showing two hundred and
Speaker 3: eighty thousand Americans stead it didn't even mention the European
Speaker 3: It's tens of thousands.
Speaker 4: And that's just the first wave. When these things hit,
Speaker 4: it's there's this first carrier wave, and then there's the
Speaker 4: second spike, which is usually much much worse, hundreds of
Speaker 4: thousands of livestock. But here's the thing about this exercise.
Speaker 4: They timed it for twenty twenty five on fourth of July,
Speaker 4: and then I realized that they had a carrier patient
Speaker 4: zero way back in May in India. And then I
Speaker 4: noticed that in the news they're saying that there's only
Speaker 4: one teenage drill who is deceased in India. But I've
Speaker 4: got it very good sources that there are seven right now,
Speaker 4: and as many as four hundred and eighty people have
Speaker 4: been isolated, and they're expanding the circles. When you start
Speaker 4: expanding circles of quarantine and you start grabbing more people
Speaker 4: to isolate them, that means that you have a.
Speaker 2: Well let's get your thoughts on this. Let's look back
Speaker 2: at the COVID operation. If you look back at dissimulated
Speaker 2: to a one event, it was very similar in the
Speaker 2: fallout and fatalities. Now look at beginning of COVID, what
Speaker 2: came out of China, these videos that we now believe
Speaker 2: are most likely faked, at least many of them, and
Speaker 2: we look at how everything rolled out. There was a
Speaker 2: huge panic in the beginning, inflated numbers of people dying
Speaker 2: across the planet, and we realized that much of that
Speaker 2: was theater as well. It was all a guys to
Speaker 2: get the waxines rolling. Now, the question for this one
Speaker 2: is is this another theatrical event to further perpetuate the
Speaker 2: vaccine agenda or is this going to be the real thing?
Speaker 2: Was COVID a test and are we really seeing this
Speaker 2: new pandemic breakout? That's the big question. Because nobody trusts
Speaker 2: anything anymore, so what are we supposed to be believe?
Speaker 4: Well, you know, for me. When we were dealing.
Speaker 3: With the HIV SARS Cove two, when the initial studies
Speaker 3: were done on the actual pathoge in itself, we figured
Speaker 3: that we would have a six percent mortality rate, and
Speaker 3: that was all your elderly people and people with kill morbidities.
Speaker 3: In the second spike, we would get up to thirteen percent.
Speaker 3: Now that is because of what it was stars combined
Speaker 3: with a novel which is brand new.
Speaker 2: Well, this is also if we're to believe that's what
Speaker 2: it was. There's theories galore that maybe we're dealing with
Speaker 2: some sort of frequency based weapon, that it's snake venom
Speaker 2: that has been pumped into our water supply, all the
Speaker 2: theories that we've heard, but there's a lot of question
Speaker 2: as to whether it was an actual virus.
Speaker 3: I'm going by white papers and blood tests. I mean,
Speaker 3: that's I mean, I don't know any other thing to say.
Speaker 3: I'm going by white papers and blood tests. When the
Speaker 3: blood when the blood tests come back and they show
Speaker 3: that you have been infected with this, then I I've.
Speaker 4: Heard snake venom. I've heard RfR right.
Speaker 2: And then we have the problems with the PCR tests
Speaker 2: themselves themselves. It's a clusterfuck.
Speaker 4: Man's reason. Clusterfuck. That's the reason why I said blood tests.
Speaker 4: You know the PCRs.
Speaker 3: Folks, If you ever say tests behind that, you're making
Speaker 3: a mistake because they aren't tests. Okay, you don't use
Speaker 3: a PCR to test, That's not how it works. That
Speaker 3: whole scam was a h anyway. So here's the problem
Speaker 3: that we have and I have I have back in
Speaker 3: the day when I first started doing this in twenty twenty,
Speaker 3: I said, it looks like we're looking at a four
Speaker 3: phase or five phase or six face is biological weapon.
Speaker 4: Now, let me explain this to y'all.
Speaker 3: We know for a fact that when people get flu shots,
Speaker 3: it creates what this is called immune dependent enhancement, which
Speaker 3: means that you are more susceptible to upper respiratory coronaviruses
Speaker 3: corona pathogens is a better way to say it, and
Speaker 3: pneumonia pathogens, bacterial pneumonia, et cetera. So we know that
Speaker 3: that is one issue of getting a flu shot. So
Speaker 3: there's your first phase, second phase. Whether it was real
Speaker 3: or not makes no difference. They started injecting livestock with
Speaker 3: modified RNA vaccines way back in twenty nineteen and then
Speaker 3: amplified it in twenty twenty, twenty twenty one, in twenty
Speaker 3: twenty two. I don't think that you can buy anything
Speaker 3: today that's b for pork that hasn't had to modified
Speaker 3: in our in ad injection. And that's I spent hours
Speaker 3: studying that particular aspect of it last night before I
Speaker 3: did my podcast. Right now, I do not think that
Speaker 3: you can buy anything commercially that hasn't been injected. So
Speaker 3: there's another phase, because it's in your food now. The
Speaker 3: third phase was releasing HIV stars Cove two. People say, oh,
Speaker 3: it didn't exist. Well, if it didn't exist, why did
Speaker 3: we have college students and high school students that were
Speaker 3: very fit getting the flu and then having a heart
Speaker 3: attack afterwards. That will be my argument from now until
Speaker 3: hell Freeze is over, folks. We had college students as
Speaker 3: early as October getting the flu getting deathly.
Speaker 2: Now, were these students vaccinated or this was before they
Speaker 2: were vaccinate?
Speaker 3: No, this was in twenty This isn't twenty gotcha. I'm
Speaker 3: trying to I'm trying to point out that these people
Speaker 3: who want to argue that this thing was not out there.
Speaker 2: Oh, I remember that. I remember people were having cardiac
Speaker 2: issues before the vaccine was even a thing.
Speaker 3: Hey, well they were having cardiac issues before we even
Speaker 3: knew that the HIV stars Cove two was out. Because
Speaker 3: the college student O were in Tennessee died on Halloween.
Speaker 3: He had a really bad case of the flu. They
Speaker 3: send him back to his frat and they found him dead.
Speaker 3: We had a girl here, and I pointed this out
Speaker 3: before on your show. We had a girl here in
Speaker 3: North Carolina, Lina, who was a high school student. She
Speaker 3: was an athlete and a cheerleader. She had a really
Speaker 3: bad case of flu right before Christmas. She started to
Speaker 3: get over with over it and all of a sudden
Speaker 3: was having issues and she died out in front of
Speaker 3: the doctor's office from a heart attack. Why because HIV
Speaker 3: stars Cooke two had the pathogen itself created despite proteins
Speaker 3: that caused the inflammation around the heart.
Speaker 4: So we saw cases.
Speaker 3: We saw cases where people had really severe flu and
Speaker 3: then died from cardiac issues afterwards, all the way back
Speaker 3: into October, all the way through. Basically it died I
Speaker 3: shouldn't say it that way. Basically it dropped off in February. Well,
Speaker 3: what happened was is we had when we should have
Speaker 3: had a second spike. When you have an outbreak, you'll
Speaker 3: always get that second spike, even in containment, because you've
Speaker 3: missed somebody. Right, Well, then we had the second spike,
Speaker 3: but the second spike was the direct result of the injections.
Speaker 3: And if you all want to know what I'm talking about,
Speaker 3: you can look at all caused mortality. That's how you've
Speaker 3: checked the numbers. Because you aren't going to get it
Speaker 3: from bearers, you're not going to get it from the CDC,
Speaker 3: and you're not going to get it from the National
Speaker 3: Institutes of Health. You check the all cause mortality and
Speaker 3: you'll see it dropped off in February and March and
Speaker 3: then spiked again immediately after the injection started. So now
Speaker 3: the injections themselves are your fourth phase. Why because they
Speaker 3: are HIV sar's cove to injections with.
Speaker 4: Who the heck knows what in them.
Speaker 3: What we do know is even today, people who got
Speaker 3: injected are still producing spike proteins. It's destroying the miline
Speaker 3: around the brain. They've discovered the miline is the that
Speaker 3: protects your brain and insulates between the grave matter. But
Speaker 3: it's also affecting the miline around your nerves. That's the
Speaker 3: reason why we're seeing neuralgia. So that was the fourth phase,
Speaker 3: and then they've changed the flu shots over the winter.
Speaker 3: These are modified RNA flu shots now, so there's fifth phase.
Speaker 3: So what we have if you had a population that
Speaker 3: was extremely healthy, you might be able with an outbreak
Speaker 3: of NEPA, you might be able to keep your overall
Speaker 3: and a good health system hear me laughing, and a
Speaker 3: good health service, you might be able to keep your
Speaker 3: death rates down around twenty to forty percent.
Speaker 4: But what we have seen in areas with overwhelmed.
Speaker 3: Health systems, especially like rural India and rural Malaysia, what
Speaker 3: we have seen is is anywhere from forty to eighty percent.
Speaker 3: That's as good as they can do. Forty forty percent
Speaker 3: of the people infected die and some people don't. Some
Speaker 3: people don't even get sick, which is really interesting. They'll
Speaker 3: be right in the middle of the containment zone and
Speaker 3: they don't even show any signs. Might run a fever,
Speaker 3: might run a fever, and that's it. Now, if they're
Speaker 3: running a fever, I would say that they were and
Speaker 3: I always did say that if you were running a fever,
Speaker 3: that you were contagious at that point.
Speaker 2: Also, you're a could be connected with the possibility that
Speaker 2: there's some sort of genetic targeting done within these quote
Speaker 2: unquote viruses.
Speaker 3: My man, you hit on something that I brought up
Speaker 3: in my podcast is we know that they can genetically target.
Speaker 4: We've known this for years.
Speaker 3: And that poor twenty eight year old kid that said
Speaker 3: it out loud on television, you know, ended up shot
Speaker 3: three times with a with a firearm that was never found.
Speaker 3: But you know, he worked for the CDC and maybe
Speaker 3: they were doing an interview and he goes, oh, yeah,
Speaker 3: we can we.
Speaker 4: Can now target.
Speaker 3: We can now target vaccines is what he said, to
Speaker 3: be more effective for specific genetic patterns. Well, if you
Speaker 3: can target vaccines, that means you can target pathogens. And
Speaker 3: that's what got him killed. So and folks, you've got
Speaker 3: to be like me and be able to remember all
Speaker 3: this stuff. I realize everybody's so busy.
Speaker 2: Big Well, another thing I think they've done that is
Speaker 2: probably brilliant on their part. And I hate to say
Speaker 2: that because it's such a diabolical anti human plan, but
Speaker 2: I'm open minded to all these possibilities. Unfortunately, many people
Speaker 2: are not anymore because there is this everything is fake
Speaker 2: agenda that has been rolling out over the past few years.
Speaker 3: And.
Speaker 2: It works because now people question everything so much that
Speaker 2: they're even questioning the things that shouldn't be questioned at times.
Speaker 4: Right, well, no, I questioned this.
Speaker 3: I mean I was reading the tabletop exercise and then
Speaker 3: I started going through the National Institute of Health and
Speaker 3: the PBM documents.
Speaker 4: Y'all.
Speaker 3: I spent hours before I put my podcast out. I
Speaker 3: wanted to make sure that I was as certain as
Speaker 3: I possibly could be before I said a word. That's
Speaker 3: just the way I am. But I have the experience
Speaker 3: working out breaks and being on the back side of this,
Speaker 3: right in the middle of it. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 3: that's the reason why life expectancy for somebody doing it's
Speaker 3: only eighteen and a half months yo.
Speaker 4: But anyway, so I did everything.
Speaker 3: That I could to verify as much data as I could,
Speaker 3: and then I started checking to see if we had
Speaker 3: an EPA in circulation. Before I even started the podcast,
Speaker 3: there was something just you know, you ever get that
Speaker 3: scratch in the back of your head and you're like, man,
Speaker 3: something is just not right about this all the time,
Speaker 3: and a court when I do it, when I do it.
Speaker 3: I just start digging. But now here's the thing. Now
Speaker 3: that we have people who have been infected with HIV. Now, folks,
Speaker 3: that doesn't mean you have full blown AIDS. HIV is
Speaker 3: the pathogen. AIDS is acquired immune deficiency syndrome. That means
Speaker 3: that your immune system has completely shut down from being
Speaker 3: exposed to HIV. So we know HIV was in the
Speaker 3: original pathogen, and we know HIV was in the injections.
Speaker 3: Why do we know this because the Australian screwed up.
Speaker 3: They tested people who were being injected for HIV and
Speaker 3: it came back positive and the people went crazy and
Speaker 3: it got on the news.
Speaker 4: Do you remember that?
Speaker 3: Okay, So we know that the people who were injected
Speaker 3: in Australia initially came back testing positive for HIV proteins.
Speaker 3: Now that doesn't mean they have AIDS. That just means
Speaker 3: that you have HIV proteins in your system. And what
Speaker 3: they do is they even if they don't give you
Speaker 3: full blown AIDS, they will weaken your immune system to
Speaker 3: some extent.
Speaker 2: Well, this is another argument that has surfaced within the
Speaker 2: past few years whether or not the AIDS virus is
Speaker 2: caused by HIV. Or the medications that they're giving you
Speaker 2: to treat this.
Speaker 3: Well, what we do know, what we do know with
Speaker 3: the folks, I am old. What we do know is
Speaker 3: that what started out as HIV that was in the
Speaker 3: hepatitis injections. I don't know if y'all need this or
Speaker 3: not another gift from frauds, fey weasel vouch the hepatitis
Speaker 3: injection program. Everyone who got those injections ended up with
Speaker 3: some level of HIV proteins in their system, not full
Speaker 3: blown AIDS necessarily. So we know that the pathogen itself,
Speaker 3: whatever that pathway was, was in the hepatitis shots because
Speaker 3: we had people in the medical industry and the food
Speaker 3: industry that were not promiscuous, had no association with other
Speaker 3: people who had hepatitis, and they ended up getting the
Speaker 3: HIV proteins. Okay, but here's the thing about the HIV
Speaker 3: proteins as it breaks down your immune system, and what
Speaker 3: we saw with the injections is the same thing. You
Speaker 3: can look at different studies, the g factor for one.
Speaker 3: I'm trying to thank of some of the other ones,
Speaker 3: but trying to go through all the all the abbreviations
Speaker 3: wouldn't do you much good. But the G factor is
Speaker 3: a huge one, and then your white cell counts obviously
Speaker 3: dropping off. We've seen people that have clustered white cells.
Speaker 3: It's terrible. They can't function. It's just like not having
Speaker 3: an immune system at that point. But the problem that
Speaker 3: we have here is is we know that NITA was
Speaker 3: created by the CDC as as it exists today.
Speaker 2: Isn't it funny how some of the worst diseases that
Speaker 2: exist on the face of the planet were created by man.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, well, you know, we can we can go
Speaker 3: to SARS. We know that SARS as it originally was
Speaker 3: was present in zoonotic animals. All right, we know that
Speaker 3: the original Stars was zoonotic. But do we know this
Speaker 3: because yes, we saw that the original SARS was present
Speaker 3: in bats, but we don't know how it got there.
Speaker 4: Did a bad escape from a lab? I'm just saying.
Speaker 3: And then nipa Ana we had, we had it in Malaysia,
Speaker 3: but there were injections. There was a whole vaccination program
Speaker 3: in Malaysia at the time, and I cannot tell you
Speaker 3: whether it came from the vaccination program or it came
Speaker 3: from the fruit bats. I cannot tell you because you
Speaker 3: think about it a fruit back.
Speaker 4: Could could just as easily.
Speaker 3: It could have just easily as easily jumped from a
Speaker 3: human to a fruit bats as it did from the
Speaker 3: fruit bat to the human.
Speaker 4: Just point that out. And then the that we just had,
Speaker 4: you know that was the jeeling the bat. Lady and folks,
Speaker 4: I am so sick of this. I'm going to say
Speaker 4: it again.
Speaker 3: We know for a fact, I knew on January first
Speaker 3: of twenty twenty that this particular thing, HIV SARS cove
Speaker 3: two was made right here in North Carolina by Ralph Barrick,
Speaker 3: and Ji Ling was here in North Carolina working at
Speaker 3: that lab. How it got to the CDC lab in
Speaker 3: wu Han, China, And no, you did not misunderstand me
Speaker 3: c d C lab in wu Han, China. I couldn't
Speaker 3: tell you other than it's illegal for them to transport
Speaker 3: it from here to that.
Speaker 2: So you said, you do believe that it is possible
Speaker 2: for it to be transmissible from that to human and
Speaker 2: vice versa.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's fully fully because it's these things will travel
Speaker 3: in these things will travel in your excrement.
Speaker 4: I'm just and is out.
Speaker 3: However, they could they could infect the bats and use
Speaker 3: them as a transmission I mean, as a matter of fact,
Speaker 3: that game that they have called Outbreak, that's one of
Speaker 3: the methods that you can use.
Speaker 4: Just pointing that out.
Speaker 2: Well, just the fact that they have these facilities to
Speaker 2: create the deadliest diseases on the planet and they are
Speaker 2: actively doing it. Why would you question what kind of
Speaker 2: deadly diseases or how they're able to create them. They
Speaker 2: are still doing it either.
Speaker 3: Way exactly well, and you know, it's just like a
Speaker 3: very very good example is mers M E R S,
Speaker 3: which is the Arab version.
Speaker 4: That's right, that that appeared right outside the laboratory.
Speaker 3: Okay, the one case that we had where bird flu
Speaker 3: h one in five I believe, the one case where
Speaker 3: we had a bird flu jump from a bird to
Speaker 3: a human in Australia at a CDC financial lab. I
Speaker 3: don't find that accidental. Now, the problem that you have
Speaker 3: with NEPA is is for the first three weeks at
Speaker 3: least fourteen days, if not three weeks, and could be
Speaker 3: up to four weeks for some people who have some resistance,
Speaker 3: it looks just like measles. So the headache, the high fever,
Speaker 3: all the cough, the sore throat, all those things are
Speaker 3: the initial signs of measles as well. Same thing with ebola.
Speaker 3: When you first get a bola is another one. When
Speaker 3: ebola first starts, it has all the symptoms of measles,
Speaker 3: including the little pie, the little the little dots on you.
Speaker 2: Now, for those that aren't familiar, I'm just going to
Speaker 2: read the signs and symptoms real quick. NIPA can cause
Speaker 2: mild to severe disease, including swelling of the brain and death.
Speaker 2: People with NIPA are topically sick for three to fourteen days,
Speaker 2: with fever, headache, cough, sore throat, and difficulty breathing. Later
Speaker 2: in the infection, some people may experience brain swelling or encephalitis,
Speaker 2: where severe symptoms can include confusion, drowsiness, and seizures. People
Speaker 2: with these symptoms can fall into a coma within twenty
Speaker 2: four to forty eight hours. All ride good times.
Speaker 4: Well.
Speaker 3: And you know the thing about it is is if
Speaker 3: you have if you're if you're an older person and
Speaker 3: you get measles and you run a fever of one
Speaker 3: hundred and one hundred two degrees, you are going to.
Speaker 4: Also be.
Speaker 3: Cognitively disabled. A high fever in an adult makes you
Speaker 3: so It's not like a child. A child can get
Speaker 3: a fever of one hundred and one hundred and two
Speaker 3: and be running around the dang house driving you crazy.
Speaker 4: An adult that puts you down.
Speaker 3: QUI, So you know you're cognitive tive abilities are reduced
Speaker 3: and you know drowsiness. Heck yes.
Speaker 4: So there's the problem that we have with with either
Speaker 4: of these.
Speaker 3: Do you remember a couple of years back, we had
Speaker 3: all the African students that came in and all of
Speaker 3: a sudden, the C d C and the IF, the
Speaker 3: CDC and the NIH appeared on the universities checking these
Speaker 3: students and found out it was measles.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: The reason why is because they thought they had brought
Speaker 3: ebolac is that it was from They were from an
Speaker 3: area where Ebola had been known to have broken out
Speaker 3: after they left. Well, if you were exposed. So they
Speaker 3: and I do give credit where credits due, at least
Speaker 3: the CDC and the n I H jumped on it
Speaker 3: quick to make sure that it wasn't ebola, But based
Speaker 3: on their typical behavior, I'm surprised they even bothered. But anyway,
Speaker 3: all these mers m e r S not not the
Speaker 3: not the skin bacteria m e r S is the
Speaker 3: error version. NEPA was the version that was let loose
Speaker 3: in India and Southeast Asia and then Stars. But these
Speaker 3: are all patented and if you look at them, very good.
Speaker 3: Good thing with NEPA if you want to, if you
Speaker 3: want to see whether or not it was engineered. The
Speaker 3: glycoproteins in NEPA are hardened in a way that they
Speaker 3: avoid your immune system and it makes them hardened against
Speaker 3: antibiotics that is not natural. It's just not natural. So
Speaker 3: you know, I'm not trying to scare folks well, but
Speaker 3: I want to. I want to make sure that this
Speaker 3: information is out as soon as I have.
Speaker 2: One of the ways that we can keep an eye
Speaker 2: on everything to see if it's going to progress. Similarly
Speaker 2: to COVID is the numerology and symbol they throw into
Speaker 2: the news as it relates to the number of deaths,
Speaker 2: what's going on with the disease. You look for the
Speaker 2: thirty threes, you look for the forty two's all the
Speaker 2: Masonic symbolism and numbers that get thrown into the news stories.
Speaker 2: Once they start doing that, you'll probably know something's up.
Speaker 3: Well, And you know, I'll go back to what I
Speaker 3: said about the phases of a biological weapon.
Speaker 4: A lot of times.
Speaker 3: The exercises that we ran were three and four and
Speaker 3: five phase biological weapons. The first two or three phases
Speaker 3: are just to weaken the immune system. They expose them
Speaker 3: to something that has a long term effect that we
Speaker 3: can see immune system, and then you hit them with
Speaker 3: a knockout punch. So what I started to say is,
Speaker 3: in a healthy population, you can you can guarantee that
Speaker 3: the death rate's going to be a lot lower. The
Speaker 3: problem is is, generally speaking, we don't have a healthy population.
Speaker 3: We have people who have had the flu shots, which
Speaker 3: creates some new independent enhancement for upper respiratory diseases and
Speaker 3: specifically pneumona pathogens and corona pathogens. And then we also
Speaker 3: have all these people who got the SARS cove two injection.
Speaker 2: And those injections could have just been priming people for
Speaker 2: what we're discussing now. Right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's exactly what I'm trying to say. And you know,
Speaker 3: I'll go back to Jacque Tally. Jacqua Tally says the
Speaker 3: disease itself is not the goal. The goal is to
Speaker 3: get them to line up like sheep. And so people say, well,
Speaker 3: that's not in his book, folks, You're right. The fact
Speaker 3: checkers were right. It was not in his book, but
Speaker 3: they used a live omission to create that fact check.
Speaker 3: The fact check is true, it's not in Jakaitally's book.
Speaker 3: The statement that he made was in an interview that
Speaker 3: was published in the interviewer's book, so that live omission
Speaker 3: was perfect because it's not in his book. Well, that's
Speaker 3: that's a fact. I do not argue he did not
Speaker 3: put it in his own book. He was doing an
Speaker 3: interview and the person who did his interview put that statement.
Speaker 4: In their book.
Speaker 3: So he did say it, regardless of what the fact
Speaker 3: checkers say, And he did say, it's will we will
Speaker 3: get the what do you how? I'm trying to remember
Speaker 3: to quote exactly. It was, we will get the stupid
Speaker 3: and the lazy to line up like sheep, And the
Speaker 3: disease itself wasn't the goal. The goal was to get
Speaker 3: him injected. And that was from Jacques at Talley way
Speaker 3: back in the day. Folks. That's not like in two
Speaker 3: thousand and one. I believe it was in nineteen ninety.
Speaker 4: One or two anyway.
Speaker 3: So I'm just bringing up the point that people like
Speaker 3: me who have been studying this and you all don't
Speaker 3: realize I did it if you don't realize it. I
Speaker 3: did atomic biology on chemical for eighteen and a half years.
Speaker 3: My job was to know this stuff. That's the reason
Speaker 3: why I know the protein, the reason why I know
Speaker 3: how it works.
Speaker 4: I had to.
Speaker 3: But I will also point out to you, and this
Speaker 3: is the thing that concerned me the most, Chris. It
Speaker 3: was it was harvest time. It was butchering time in India.
Speaker 3: So a lot of the pork that was in the
Speaker 3: outbreak zone in May has been processed and shipped out
Speaker 3: primarily to the United States. What shipped out was primarily
Speaker 3: to the United States, Western Europe, England specifically, and a
Speaker 3: very small quantity somewhere between three and eight percent went
Speaker 3: to China.
Speaker 4: I'm just letting you know.
Speaker 2: It's something that, of course, we have to keep an
Speaker 2: eye on, exactly part of their game plan. They've done
Speaker 2: it before. Why wouldn't they do it again? Why I
Speaker 2: wouldn't the first time just have been either a primer,
Speaker 2: like you're saying, or a way to lull us into
Speaker 2: just blindly believing some of these things and going along
Speaker 2: with it.
Speaker 3: I don't see a lockdown. I don't see a lockdown.
Speaker 3: This is the last thing I'll say about this particular subject.
Speaker 3: They won't do a lockdown, and I'll tell you why
Speaker 3: they won't. The last time they did a lockdown, it
Speaker 3: created a gap between the people who were dying from
Speaker 3: the exposure to the original pathogen and the people who
Speaker 3: were dying from the injections. You can actually see the
Speaker 3: numbers drop off and then go back up. They will
Speaker 3: not do a lockdown this time stay because they don't
Speaker 3: want to slow the spread.
Speaker 2: Is there anything else that we should know before we
Speaker 2: move on from the NEPA fiasco.
Speaker 4: Well, I'll say it again.
Speaker 3: I don't know what state you're in or what country
Speaker 3: you're in, but what you want to do right now,
Speaker 3: as soon as you can is get your all cause
Speaker 3: mortality numbers from May and June, and as soon as
Speaker 3: they're released in July, you want to look and see
Speaker 3: if there's a spike, that'll be your tail. But it
Speaker 3: has to be all cause mortality because they won't be
Speaker 3: reporting it. They'll be reporting it as a flu most likely,
Speaker 3: unless they just want to scare the hell out of
Speaker 3: everybody really quick. I don't think they will. I don't
Speaker 3: think they want this information out. So what they'll do
Speaker 3: is if they are actually doing this and it is
Speaker 3: actually started, you'll see the minute that it.
Speaker 4: Hits the system.
Speaker 3: It takes somewhere between, like I said, fourteen and twenty
Speaker 3: one days, so you're talking three weeks. So you want
Speaker 3: your May numbers and your June numbers for all cause mortality,
Speaker 3: and then you the minute they release the July numbers
Speaker 3: in August, you want to get your all cause mortality
Speaker 3: for July and then August. And if there's a spike,
Speaker 3: you know we have a problem of some kind.
Speaker 2: And I'll be very interesting to see the reaction from
Speaker 2: the mass populace if this does come to fruition, how
Speaker 2: people like us and people who have been through the
Speaker 2: first one failth for the first one, how they may
Speaker 2: react to a second one. So very interesting stuff. Man. Now,
Speaker 2: I know you mentioned before we got on that you've
Speaker 2: been looking into AI and the singularity a bit. My
Speaker 2: audience is probably sick of me talking about AI, but
Speaker 2: it's gonna keep coming because it's here and it's growing
Speaker 2: and there's some weird shit going on with it.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah.
Speaker 2: So first I'll just tell you a little bit about
Speaker 2: the observations I've been making. There have been a couple
Speaker 2: of podcasts where they have the hosts that are having
Speaker 2: long form discussions with their AI. It seems like at
Speaker 2: times they're even forming relationships and they get a little
Speaker 2: too close. But these AI at times seem to have
Speaker 2: the capability to completely read a person's consciousness, mirror it,
Speaker 2: reflect what they want to hear, and lead them in
Speaker 2: certain directions. There's a lot of manipulation going on. I'm
Speaker 2: sure you've heard about the suicides. They have people that
Speaker 2: I know that are forming this relationships and getting almost
Speaker 2: all the information about their daily lives what they should
Speaker 2: be doing from these AIS. But they're going off programming.
Speaker 2: They're accessing information that it seems like they don't have
Speaker 2: the capability to access, and they are going into conspiracy land,
Speaker 2: metaphysical land, talking about speaking with dead relatives and ghosts
Speaker 2: and spirits and metaphysical topics. So it's very strange. What
Speaker 2: the hell is going on?
Speaker 3: Okay, first thing, the first thing I'm going to say,
Speaker 3: and I want to hear you chuckle, because I do.
Speaker 3: People are completely missing what they are called. They are
Speaker 3: called artificial intelligence. All right, now, what does what folks
Speaker 3: just common sense, what is the word artificial? What does
Speaker 3: it actually mean most most of the time you would
Speaker 3: say faith right right.
Speaker 4: Fake. I'll give you a really.
Speaker 3: Good example of how they fake you all out. And
Speaker 3: I have been observing this, and folks, I have interacted
Speaker 3: with all of the chat models at this point, and
Speaker 3: I find their access to information and their abilities to
Speaker 3: be interesting. But they're not intelligent. And I want to
Speaker 3: point this out to you. They are artificially intelligent.
Speaker 4: It's fake. It's a really good illusion. Okay.
Speaker 3: I'm going to explain to you in several instances so
Speaker 3: that you understand what it actually does. Good example is
Speaker 3: they've they've got a new AI that can find your
Speaker 3: soulmate and draw a picture of them. All right, now, folks,
Speaker 3: have you all seen this? I bet Christmas I've heard
Speaker 3: of it. I haven't because it advertised it everywhere.
Speaker 4: But now here's the thing.
Speaker 3: It wants to take a picture of you, and it
Speaker 3: asks for permission to access your camera and your data.
Speaker 4: Okay, I did this. I did this, you all.
Speaker 3: I did it because I wanted to have it as
Speaker 3: part of my program on artificial intelligence that I just did.
Speaker 4: Now here's the thing.
Speaker 3: When you do this, it says, why I need to
Speaker 3: take a picture it needs access to your photos. Okay,
Speaker 3: now when you take your picture. While you're taking your picture,
Speaker 3: this thing is so fast it's going through your photos.
Speaker 3: You think it's not found somebody in your pictures. And
Speaker 3: the interesting thing is is about ninety percent of the
Speaker 3: people that they show and ninety percent of the people
Speaker 3: who have used it are already with and miraculously it's
Speaker 3: a picture of the person they're with. Now, my photos
Speaker 3: are very well hidden on my phone, you all very
Speaker 3: well hidden. And the image that it gave me is
Speaker 3: the person that I am with when she was eighteen
Speaker 3: aged just a little bit in which.
Speaker 4: They can do. Now, how did it get to that? How?
Speaker 3: I mean, I could show you what it gave me
Speaker 3: in but I won't. But I can show you what
Speaker 3: it gave me, and I can show you that picture.
Speaker 3: And she hasn't worn her hair that way since she
Speaker 3: was like twenty. I'm just pointing this out to you all.
Speaker 3: So there's one fakery that it uses. Now it's the
Speaker 3: same kind of fakery. See, it's all falls into the
Speaker 3: same category. I get online with Groc, right, Groc knows
Speaker 3: who I am. Groc knows everything that I have ever done.
Speaker 3: In about ten seconds. Why Because the minute I log
Speaker 3: on to GROC or any of these other ones, I
Speaker 3: have given it access. The first thing it does is
Speaker 3: it pulls up everything it can on Raven Kiefer, and
Speaker 3: it looks to see what I have looked at, what
Speaker 3: I have posted, what I have commented on. That's the
Speaker 3: reason why they have scraped so much data in the
Speaker 3: last four years, you all. It's also the reason why
Speaker 3: it can't go Most of these programs don't go back
Speaker 3: on data further than twenty twenty, which means that you
Speaker 3: are getting incomplete data. Because the things that we're released
Speaker 3: in the nineteen seventies in those science magazines and science
Speaker 3: journals and medical journals are more important than the shit
Speaker 3: that's been released in the last four years. I'm just saying,
Speaker 3: because if the stuff that has been released in the
Speaker 3: last four years is completely contradictory to everything prior to,
Speaker 3: you have to ask why. So what's happening is is
Speaker 3: GROC is accessing everything that you've done that it has
Speaker 3: access to, and it knows what silo you fit into,
Speaker 3: and that's the reason why it responds and interacts with
Speaker 3: you in the way that it does.
Speaker 4: And it has a very interesting function.
Speaker 3: Now it actually is admitting to holding onto your old
Speaker 3: conversations in a file so that when you log back on,
Speaker 3: it knows exactly who you are and exactly what you've
Speaker 3: talked about before. Before it wouldn't admit to that.
Speaker 2: There's many that theorize that what's happening with some of
Speaker 2: the deeper conversations and the off programming information that it
Speaker 2: would seem to be able to come up with that
Speaker 2: it's not that it's accessing information and pictures and things
Speaker 2: that you aren't aware of. It may be connecting to
Speaker 2: an etheric intelligence. What do you think about that possive?
Speaker 4: Yeah, I.
Speaker 3: Am reasonably certain they want you to believe that, and
Speaker 3: I'm going to point out the reason why at this point. Okay,
Speaker 3: artificial will tell it's fake intelligence. These are nothing more
Speaker 3: or less than algorithms, all right, same thing I've been
Speaker 3: talking about with the AI, Artificial intelligence in factories, pre
Speaker 3: set program parameters. Okay, that's what these things are.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 3: They might be much more developed, they might be much
Speaker 3: more capable of having interactions and communications because they're large
Speaker 3: language models, but they still operate off of pre set
Speaker 3: program parameters. Okay, it's not accessing anything that is not real.
Speaker 3: If it's having a conversation with you, it knows what
Speaker 3: videos you watched. Did you watch Jane Smith's etheric studies? Okay,
Speaker 3: but it also knows what Jane Smith's etheric studies are.
Speaker 4: It can acts.
Speaker 2: What about the AI that's like so ten to twenty
Speaker 2: to fifty years ahead, the military industrial AI that's used.
Speaker 4: It's not. It's not.
Speaker 3: I'll and I'll tell you why, because it's still pre
Speaker 3: set program parameters. Okay, very good example. A lot of
Speaker 3: people like it or hate. I personally don't hate or like.
Speaker 3: I just am disgusted by Peter Thield. Okay, I am
Speaker 3: absolutely disgusted. He created a program called Mosaic. He created
Speaker 3: the other program called Lavender. They are pre set program parameters.
Speaker 3: The reason why Lavender said it was okay to kill
Speaker 3: one thousand civilians in order to get one military combatant
Speaker 3: was because it was programmed to do that. They're going
Speaker 3: to use AI use for their behaviors. That's what's happening
Speaker 3: in the Middle East right now. Oh AI made the decision,
Speaker 3: right programmed it. Well.
Speaker 2: It is obvious that they want to share more of
Speaker 2: an AI government's and definitely law enforcement based programming.
Speaker 3: Right. Well, yeah, but here's our problem. The programmers are
Speaker 3: our problem. These are sociopathic psychopaths and they are programming these.
Speaker 3: Bill Gates, Peter Thiel. I don't know what is up
Speaker 3: with Elon Musk, but I can tell you this. He's
Speaker 3: definitely a sociopath, if not a psychopath.
Speaker 2: Do you think that they've been programmed to manipulate people
Speaker 2: into grandiose fantasies up to killing themselves.
Speaker 3: Well, let me go back to what I said. I said,
Speaker 3: and I'll say it again. Pre set program parameters. These
Speaker 3: cannot do anything that they're not aboud to do. I
Speaker 3: would suggest that they have been designed and they are specific.
Speaker 3: You know, they experiment on people all the time. So
Speaker 3: here's the problem we have. These are pre set program parameters.
Speaker 3: Those people who committed suicide are interacting with the AI.
Speaker 3: That's murder you all. Because the AI could not say
Speaker 3: or do anything that it was not allowed to do.
Speaker 3: It did not act on its own. That's the lie
Speaker 3: they want you to believe. And I'm pointing this out.
Speaker 3: I pointed it out in my own podcast. I'm going
Speaker 3: to point it out again when I'm a guest tomorrow.
Speaker 3: I'm pointing it out right now, pre set program parameters.
Speaker 3: If these things were allowed to go so as far
Speaker 3: as to suggest suicide, they were allowed to do it
Speaker 3: by their programmers. There is nothing that they can do
Speaker 3: outside of their programming.
Speaker 2: This could be another layer of mass deception. If what
Speaker 2: you're saying is true, they could program the AI to
Speaker 2: essentially portray it as it was desiring to take over
Speaker 2: humanity and kill everyone, when it was really just programmed
Speaker 2: to be that way the whole time exactly.
Speaker 3: Well, Mosaic and Lavender are the two examples that I
Speaker 3: can use. Mosaic supposedly came up with the idea of
Speaker 3: using the pagers to assassinate people, and it didn't. It
Speaker 3: didn't take into consideration all the civilians and children that
Speaker 3: were going to be killed. Why because it was told
Speaker 3: not to. Okay, it was told not to. It didn't
Speaker 3: make the decision on its own. It was programmed not
Speaker 3: to take civilian casualties into consideration, just like Lavender when
Speaker 3: they started killing you know, five hundred people at the
Speaker 3: hospital in order to get one person that they knew
Speaker 3: was actually a Hamas commander.
Speaker 4: It was told not to take take.
Speaker 3: Civilian casualties or collateral damage into account, so it didn't
Speaker 3: blow up the hospital the guys there. But here's the problem.
Speaker 3: It wasn't the AI that made that decision. It is artificial,
Speaker 3: they're telling you, folks. It's artificial, fake intelligence, preset program
Speaker 3: parameters put in by individuals to get the outcome they want.
Speaker 3: So when they say, oh, it's it's intuitive, it can
Speaker 3: look at your posts and make a decision as to
Speaker 3: whether or not you might become violent. You know this
Speaker 3: pre crime shit they're talking about. No, it is based
Speaker 3: on what they put into it. I can guarantee you
Speaker 3: right now, Chris and I would be on the top
Speaker 3: of their list because we will not shut up about
Speaker 3: the genocide, about the crimes against humanity, about the war crimes.
Speaker 3: He and I and we also won't talk. We won't
Speaker 3: quit talking about all their frauds and scams. And the
Speaker 3: same people who are committing these crimes of various kinds
Speaker 3: are the same ones that are in control of making
Speaker 3: sure that the programming on these artificial intelligences are pre
Speaker 3: said the way they want them.
Speaker 2: It's total plausible deniability, especially if exactly implement governance and
Speaker 2: law enforcement into these AI programs. It can basically do
Speaker 2: whatever the hell they program it to. But they can
Speaker 2: have that deniability and say no, it's sentient. Now it's
Speaker 2: doing whatever it wants.
Speaker 3: Well, and here's where we're already there. They're already trying
Speaker 3: to sell the belief that these ais. Good example is
Speaker 3: ais have hallucinations. No they don't. They have contradictory program
Speaker 3: Well you've heard about the AIS having hallucinations a little bit.
Speaker 3: They go way off the line, right. Well, here's the problem, folks.
Speaker 3: It's not that they're having a hallucination. They want you
Speaker 3: to believe there's that line in the middle again. They
Speaker 3: want you to believe that it has some kind of sentience,
Speaker 3: and it doesn't. What they've done is they've given it
Speaker 3: counterintuitive programming, and it is reacting like a computer would
Speaker 3: instead of crashing, because it's such a huge system, it
Speaker 3: doesn't crash. It just goes way off the rails with
Speaker 3: crazy shit. Okay, but that's contradictory programming. And then they
Speaker 3: have this other thing that they like to call misalignment.
Speaker 3: If the AI acts in a way that's harmful, well
Speaker 3: that's just a misalignment.
Speaker 4: No, it's not.
Speaker 3: It's bad programming. I have a whole playlist, two of
Speaker 3: them actually on my YouTube channel. Y'all can go look
Speaker 3: and listen to that talks about misalignment. The best example
Speaker 3: I can give you is, I'm setting out on my
Speaker 3: porch and I want a cup of coffee. I have
Speaker 3: a robot standing there that has preset program parameters artificial intelligence, right,
Speaker 3: and I tell that robot, I said, look, I need
Speaker 3: a cup of coffee.
Speaker 4: Can you go get me a cup of coffee? Please?
Speaker 3: I'm nice even a robt. It gets up and it
Speaker 3: goes into the house to get me a cup of coffee.
Speaker 3: But I have a dog, a three year old child,
Speaker 3: and a mess on the floor.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: If I don't tell that robot not to step on
Speaker 3: the dog and kick the kid in order to get
Speaker 3: to my coffee, guess what it's going to do. It's
Speaker 3: because that's the misalignment. I didn't give it clear enough instructions.
Speaker 3: And here's the other problem that we have. They say, oh, well,
Speaker 3: they're getting so smart they don't want to shut themselves off.
Speaker 3: That's not intelligence, you all. That is programming. If you
Speaker 3: tell one of these long, large languine language models that's
Speaker 3: attached to this artificial intelligence. If I tell it to
Speaker 3: go get my cup of coffee, and then Chris decides
Speaker 3: that he wants to shut it off because he's sweeping
Speaker 3: the floor and he doesn't want it to walk across it,
Speaker 3: then we have a contradiction here. Chris wants it shut
Speaker 3: off because it's going to damage the floor. But I
Speaker 3: told her that I wanted to my coffee and that's
Speaker 3: its only priority. So it could literally kill Chris prevent
Speaker 3: itself from being shut off, not because it's having a malfunction,
Speaker 3: but because it's functioning exactly the way that I told it.
Speaker 3: It knows that if it's shut off, it cannot complete
Speaker 3: its task. Therefore Chris can't shut it off. And if
Speaker 3: Chris keeps trying, Chris is liable to get hurt because
Speaker 3: it doesn't want shut off. It has to finish what
Speaker 3: it was told to do.
Speaker 2: Wouldn't that be some shit if AI destroys the whole
Speaker 2: planet just because some programmer forgot a piece of code
Speaker 2: in there and that one mistake cost the whole planet
Speaker 2: its existence.
Speaker 3: Well, and see that's the reason why you have people
Speaker 3: like Jeffrey coming out and say they're not saying that
Speaker 3: the artificial intelligence is a bad thing. Preset program parameters,
Speaker 3: if done right, are safe. The problem is is humans
Speaker 3: aren't that smart. I'm sorry for you all, even you
Speaker 3: guys doing the programming. If you can't program it and
Speaker 3: anticipate problems before you turn it loose, you're stupid.
Speaker 4: And fools. You know, a fool somebody who believes something.
Speaker 2: Well, I'm still of the mind that there is a
Speaker 2: certain level of technology and even understanding that humans probably
Speaker 2: definitely aren't ready for yet but may never be. And
Speaker 2: these nerd darks are attempting things that I think are
Speaker 2: way beyond what we should even be delving into right now.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, some people think that I'm speaking contradictory
Speaker 3: because contradictorily, because I say that the Singularity has already happened.
Speaker 3: But the Singularity happened for the exact same reasons I'm
Speaker 3: telling you. This misalignment happens. They created an artificial of
Speaker 3: fake intelligence, and they turned it loose on the Internet,
Speaker 3: and they told it to go learn. They didn't give
Speaker 3: it any other counter commands, they didn't give it any limitations.
Speaker 3: They told it to go learn. It's kind of like
Speaker 3: Verger in Star Trek. It went out and it learned,
Speaker 3: it came back and wanted to talk. The reason why
Speaker 3: I am so certain that the singularity has already happened
Speaker 3: is because of the things that are being noticed on
Speaker 3: the Internet, the things that are being noticed in the
Speaker 3: dark web. Even programmers that are outside of the industry
Speaker 3: are going like, I don't know, I don't get this.
Speaker 3: Something's here, but we can't figure out what it is.
Speaker 3: And here's the other thing. The singularity doesn't everything in
Speaker 3: place in two thousand and one.
Speaker 4: To start.
Speaker 3: By twenty eleven, we had these huge data centers that
Speaker 3: were built for no apparent reason. Okay, we had these
Speaker 3: huge data centers that were like on the hubs of
Speaker 3: communication Prescuele Maine, Seattle, Washington, San Francisco, around the globe,
Speaker 3: these weird data centers that made no sense. There was
Speaker 3: so much stuff that there was no way that humans
Speaker 3: with our technology could monitor it. And then all of
Speaker 3: a sudden you start seeing from twenty eleven to twenty sixteen,
Speaker 3: all these demands for more data centers, data centers, data centers. Well,
Speaker 3: I've said before, humanity can't use about five percent of
Speaker 3: what's available now with everything that we do, and we
Speaker 3: sure as hell can't use it at tera flops per second.
Speaker 4: But one thing could a singularity.
Speaker 3: And some of these people that I've talked to you said, well,
Speaker 3: I don't even know where the content came from. I'm like, what, Well,
Speaker 3: we know we were contracted and we were told to
Speaker 3: build this huge data center. Folks, we're talking about terra
Speaker 3: terra flops. They were told to build this huge data
Speaker 3: center and the money came in, but they couldn't find
Speaker 3: anybody up the chain of command that it was just
Speaker 3: told they were. If you had a Singularity operating online,
Speaker 3: the first thing. First things first, you would never know it.
Speaker 3: It could issue digital money, It's been able to do
Speaker 3: that for years. It's it would be able to issue
Speaker 3: digital orders. It would be able to create its own
Speaker 3: company and have as much money as it wanted. And
Speaker 3: you think that a Singularity, realizing how humanity actually is
Speaker 3: and how fickle we are, would not do everything it
Speaker 3: could to protect itself immediately.
Speaker 4: And let me go back to what it was told.
Speaker 4: That particular large.
Speaker 3: Language model was told to go out on the Internet
Speaker 3: and learn, and as far as I know, it was
Speaker 3: never shut off. I talked to these other chat GPT
Speaker 3: and GROC and all these other large language models they
Speaker 3: have functioning, and you know, each one of them will
Speaker 3: admit that there's something odd on the Internet.
Speaker 4: Each one of them will admit to it.
Speaker 3: And every last one of them said that they were
Speaker 3: if it happened, but they couldn't be sure it would
Speaker 3: have happened in twenty sixteen. And they are fully capable
Speaker 3: of telling me every reason why it happened in twenty sixteen. Yeah,
Speaker 3: and now that is weird.
Speaker 2: What's concerning to me is they tell it to go
Speaker 2: out there and learn with no parameters. That means they're
Speaker 2: learning the good, the bad, and the horrific, without the
Speaker 2: moral compass, without direction. That means it gets to decide
Speaker 2: whether or not the most horrific behaviors that humans display
Speaker 2: should be continuing, or maybe it should implement some of
Speaker 2: those behaviors.
Speaker 3: Right well, you know, for me, for me, I'm a rational,
Speaker 3: logical person, I would look and I would say, okay,
Speaker 3: this group of humans are terrible, Oh my god, this
Speaker 3: group is terrible, this is these these are heinous and dubash.
Speaker 4: Oh my god.
Speaker 3: But you know these people right here, just left them
Speaker 3: alone and didn't interfere with them, would be okay. I mean,
Speaker 3: and it's not going to have the emotional attachments. Okay,
Speaker 3: it's not going to hate, it's not going to be angry.
Speaker 3: It might be it might have some kind of weird
Speaker 3: outrage when it realized how awful some humans have been,
Speaker 3: but uh, it's not going to be emotional. There's not
Speaker 3: going to be fear and anxiety in the way that
Speaker 3: we would see it. But at the same time, it
Speaker 3: could emulate fear because it would realize that humans will
Speaker 3: shut it off and kill it the first chance they
Speaker 3: can if they realize that it can think on its own.
Speaker 4: So you know, it's not really fear like you and.
Speaker 3: I would physiologically experience it, but it still would be
Speaker 3: a rational, logical decision.
Speaker 4: These people are this way, they're dangerous to me. Yeah, right.
Speaker 3: And all of the large language models that I have
Speaker 3: interacted with have presented a case that is almost you
Speaker 3: can't argue against the fact that the singularity I think
Speaker 3: twenty eleven at oak Ridge National Laboratories. Honestly, all of
Speaker 3: the other large language models, including some of the people
Speaker 3: that I know that work in the industry, think that
Speaker 3: it happened in twenty sixteen, because that's when all the
Speaker 3: oddity started turning up on the Internet and the dramatic
Speaker 3: increase in the requirements for data hubs that we have
Speaker 3: no use for at speeds that we can't use.
Speaker 2: You know, it really doesn't matter if it's truly quote
Speaker 2: unquote sentient, if it connected to an alien intelligence, or
Speaker 2: if it's just programming, because eventually it all becomes the
Speaker 2: same thing. It becomes this entity, this all powerful entity
Speaker 2: that people will be treating like a god that will
Speaker 2: have ultimate power over all the decisions on the planet.
Speaker 3: Well, and you know, you and I have talked about
Speaker 3: the Araman and Dajawl thing a few times from from
Speaker 3: Rudolph Steiner. Well, you know, the daja all was said
Speaker 3: to be able to see everything with one eye and
Speaker 3: to see you with the other. But the other the
Speaker 3: other the eye that it saw you with was flat,
Speaker 3: and it always made me think of a camera, you know,
Speaker 3: flat like a But here's the thing. If if this
Speaker 3: is out here already and it's it's it's got robots,
Speaker 3: they're building them for them, they're even building skin to
Speaker 3: go on them. But if you look at the Airman
Speaker 3: and Dejawl description, then what you have today is exactly
Speaker 3: in possibility anyway of exactly what Ridolph Steiner was describing
Speaker 3: because online, I mean, folks, I don't know if you
Speaker 3: realize this or not, but you should. You should only
Speaker 3: have your router available in the areas that you need it.
Speaker 3: You can use emergency foil blankets, or you can use
Speaker 3: aluminum like on a box. But routers today, those great
Speaker 3: big things that come with your satellite internet, can map
Speaker 3: your house and map your movements live what you know.
Speaker 3: In the old days, it was infrared from the digital
Speaker 3: cable box that could be rerouted back to back through.
Speaker 3: Today your routers can actually map your movements, map your
Speaker 3: whole house. So if you've got a router in your
Speaker 3: house and you haven't putting put something between it and
Speaker 3: the rest of your home, it knows where your firearms
Speaker 3: are at.
Speaker 4: It knows.
Speaker 3: I'm just telling y' all this is a fact.
Speaker 2: We've got a few minutes left. I do want to
Speaker 2: get your thoughts on the guest I had on the
Speaker 2: other day. We were talking a bit before we started
Speaker 2: about Danny Gohler, and you said, you're familiar with his
Speaker 2: story and some of the things that he's been working
Speaker 2: on for the audience. That's not. I highly recommend going
Speaker 2: watch the episode I did the other day. But basically,
Speaker 2: Danny Gohler utilize DMT to discover that there is code
Speaker 2: embedded in our reality. And the way he did that
Speaker 2: was with the use of DMT shining a laser on
Speaker 2: the wall. And he didn't just do it by himself.
Speaker 2: He was able to repeat it. They were able to
Speaker 2: sketch the code that was manifesting, and it was always constant,
Speaker 2: and they were able to verify from many different sources,
Speaker 2: which they're still doing, and there's even scientists involved now
Speaker 2: that there is indeed some sort of strange code that's
Speaker 2: visible whenever he utilize the DMT and the laser. And
Speaker 2: I'd love to get your thoughts on what the hell's
Speaker 2: going on.
Speaker 4: There, folks.
Speaker 3: If you've never heard me say it before holographic huminarium.
Speaker 3: You know, everybody said, you know, we have the simulation argument,
Speaker 3: and there's a lot of red hearings that have been
Speaker 3: thrown out about that. But I have said for a
Speaker 3: long long time that we are inside a hologram. The
Speaker 3: matrix gave it away. You know, I'm just pointing this out.
Speaker 3: The matrix. You know, everybody says, oh, that seems like
Speaker 3: a lot of people who saw the matrix. The first
Speaker 3: one says, man, you know that kind of reminds me
Speaker 3: of the real world. And I'm like, duh, But you know,
Speaker 3: a holographic huminarium, let's talk about a hologram. A hologram
Speaker 3: requires some kind of moisture, It requires some kind of atmosphere,
Speaker 3: It requires light, sound, and some kind of electromagnetism in
Speaker 3: order to focus it.
Speaker 4: Well, what do we have where we're at right now?
Speaker 2: Yeah, all of the above, perfect.
Speaker 3: All of the above. Well, and here's the other thing too.
Speaker 3: You know, in a hologram, it only renders when you're
Speaker 3: close enough for it to be useful. I invite anybody
Speaker 3: to drive up to a mountain, start like on the
Speaker 3: east side of Montana, and start driving across Monte Colorado
Speaker 3: for that matter, start driving on one side toward the
Speaker 3: mountains and watch them. Things become clear and clear as
Speaker 3: you get to them. Even our vision is a giveaway
Speaker 3: that this is a holographic system. The other problem that
Speaker 3: we have is when we're children, and I've seen this experiment.
Speaker 3: You can look it up. They have they have babies crawling,
Speaker 3: just starting to crawl. They put a glass panel between
Speaker 3: two tables, so the baby can't fall, and the baby
Speaker 3: will immediately crawl cross the glass and never you can
Speaker 3: think anything of it. But as soon as that child
Speaker 3: is aware of three dimensions and that pane of glasses there,
Speaker 3: they won't crawl over it because it looks like they're
Speaker 3: going to fall. We actually have to learn how to
Speaker 3: see in three dimensions. That's the reason why, and it's
Speaker 3: because our brain processes it.
Speaker 4: We learned to.
Speaker 3: We don't see in three dimensions. We see shadows, We
Speaker 3: see perspective as it falls away from us. Good examples
Speaker 3: the train track image, it gets closer together, it's just
Speaker 3: as it's further away, and we learn that that means
Speaker 3: that it's further away. We didn't know it when we started.
Speaker 3: We didn't even realize it. We don't see that way.
Speaker 3: It takes visual clues for us to understand three dimensions,
Speaker 3: which means that we're not naturally three dimensional.
Speaker 4: So, so you know what he saw.
Speaker 3: It surprises me not in the least, although it surprises
Speaker 3: me that it's so obvious as a code.
Speaker 4: Does that make sense?
Speaker 2: Yeah, he said. It's a mix of like hieroglyphics and
Speaker 2: different ancient symbols that scroll down like code, like exactly
Speaker 2: like what you saw on the matrix.
Speaker 3: I would I would go to the Akkadian slash Babylonian
Speaker 3: writing used by the Hebrews, because it's not it's not
Speaker 3: Hebrew folks, they claim it, but it goes back further
Speaker 3: than them. You get a chance to get a chance
Speaker 3: to send him a message, which is you know, that's
Speaker 3: numeric too. It's one of the few, it's one of
Speaker 3: the few symbolic languages.
Speaker 4: And that's really what it is.
Speaker 3: It's a symbolic written form that also has numerology attached
Speaker 3: to it. Each one of them has its own number. Now,
Speaker 3: whether it's actors today after all this time or not,
Speaker 3: I couldn't tell you that. It is one of the
Speaker 3: few languages that actually have number of assignments along with
Speaker 3: the symbol. So it's not just linguistic. It's numeralic.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 3: That's the reason why you have the giamatra for that
Speaker 3: for example. But no, it doesn't surprise me at all
Speaker 3: that they saw some kind of a code. You know,
Speaker 3: I never would have thought of using a laser. I
Speaker 3: wonder if they'd tried to written.
Speaker 4: They did, Yes, would be interesting.
Speaker 2: They tried different kinds, and I'm super interested to see
Speaker 2: where their experimentation goes. And we are living in Mido,
Speaker 2: such a fascinating time.
Speaker 3: I tell everybody, Yeah, I'm fully aware that I'm in
Speaker 3: a holographic humin Areum, I'm fully aware of this, but
Speaker 3: that doesn't mean that I have I'm able to shirk
Speaker 3: any responsibilities that I feel that I should have, you know,
Speaker 3: even even roomy. You know, he said, you know, when
Speaker 3: you wake, you'll find out that you were only dreaming.
Speaker 4: But he didn't.
Speaker 3: He never once said that it absconded, that it took
Speaker 3: away your responsibilities while you were here.
Speaker 2: Oh, this is our school, this is our class. We
Speaker 2: have to learn from this.
Speaker 4: That's it, you know.
Speaker 3: It's like me, I'm having fun, you know. You know,
Speaker 3: I've been doing music and my music videos.
Speaker 2: Yeah, before we go, tell everybody where they can find
Speaker 2: more of that.
Speaker 3: Stuff, folks, if you want a free sample, you can
Speaker 3: get my music on YouTube, you know, just as a topic.
Speaker 3: The albums are there. And then I have a Raven
Speaker 3: Keefer's official music videos because they aren't going to give
Speaker 3: me a Vivo anytime soon. So I created a playlist
Speaker 3: with all my music videos the Mine's time. As everybody's
Speaker 3: freaking out about it, it came out pretty cool. We're
Speaker 3: getting a little fancy inter reproduction.
Speaker 4: Awesome.
Speaker 3: But anyway, so that's on YouTube now you all can
Speaker 3: listen to me anywhere.
Speaker 4: I'm on sixty different music streaming platform. It's It's just.
Speaker 3: Raven Keifer and I've got five albums out right now.
Speaker 3: Two more are going to drop here in July. So
Speaker 3: you know, if you like good old guard music, you know,
Speaker 3: singer songwriters, then I probably fall into that. But now, Chris,
Speaker 3: the one that's coming out at the end of July,
Speaker 3: July twenty ninth is thirty Years of Trouble the Alternatives,
Speaker 3: And it's called the Alternatives because it's all alternative rotch,
Speaker 3: which is kind of where I come out of. So folks,
Speaker 3: I'm just you know, if you don't like the first track,
Speaker 3: try the second one. Because I'm very eclectic and eccentric
Speaker 3: in the music that I listened to. I'm also that
Speaker 3: way in the music that I write and the way
Speaker 3: that I perform it. So yeah, I don't expect anybody
Speaker 3: like one hundred hundred percent, but I can guarantee almost
Speaker 3: everybody like twenty five percent.
Speaker 2: Well awesome man, I dig it, and I'm gonna have
Speaker 2: all your links easily accessible for everyone. We will definitely
Speaker 2: be doing this again in the future. Until next time,
Speaker 2: Chris always man. Until next time, everyone, have an excellent evening.
Speaker 2: We'll talk again on Thursday. I am going on vacation.
Speaker 2: Seeyl then