Speaker 1: Times match we have today, your betbuilders hang away a
thread here, Relax, relax, they still need one more goal.
Well if it loses, nov BET's got your covered. Novie
besh is the home of the betbuilder. This World Cup
from goalscorers to cards. Get the fast value on every match,
plus get money back as a pree bash. If your
bet builder loses on the biggest game every single day,
join today and get seventy euros in pre bets nov Bash.
More power to you, teacencs apply eighteen plus bet responsibly
Gamblingcare Dot I e.
Speaker 2: The Rush Hour with James Golden, entertaining and informative.
Speaker 3: On the Red Apple Podcast Network.
Speaker 4: Welcome my friends to the Tuesday edition of Boat Nerble's
Rush Hour, the fastest hour in American media. Lots of things,
of course in the news today, and we will touch
on as many of them as time allows. Some of
them hilarious, some of them, well, you will be the judge.
I did not know until I read something in the
Washington Post. Is it wor yes, it's the Washington Post.
I did not know that the Energy Star program had
helped many American consumers and was very, very very popular.
You know when you go buy a major appliance, they
have these yellow stickers all over it that people peel
off and everything. It's Energy Star. That stuff. Well, the
Trump administration, ladies and gentlemen, sad to say, from those
of you fans, and apparently there are many of you,
many many of you fans of Energy Star, the Trump
administration is doing away with the Energy Star program for
home appliances. The Environmental Protection Agencies, as the Washington Post,
plans to end Energy Star, a popular, popular program whose
iconic blue label see I thought they were yellow. I
always whatever. Blue labels have certified the energy efficiency of
home appliances for more than three decades, according to three
people brief doing the matter and documentary viewed by The
Washington Post, doing an all hands meeting Monday, of the
EPA's Office of Atmospheric Protection, the administration officials announced the
office would be dissolved and that Energy Star would be eliminated.
This was it. What the heck does energy Star have
to do with atmospheric Protector? Anyway, it doesn't matter, the
three people said, speaking on the condition of anonymity, because
they were not authorized to comment publicly, and they should
be fired for leaking to The Washington Post. The end
of energy Star, first reported by CNN, bills on the
Trump administration's broader attacks attacks on energy efficiency standards. Yet,
the decision is likely to draw a pushback on Capitol Hill,
where Energy Star has historically enjoyed modest bipartisan support. A
handful of moderate Republican senators have championed the program out
and rhinos most likely. So now we have callos. What
are you gonna do when it's time to go buy
a new appliance and there's no Energy Star label on it?
What are you gonna do? How are you gonna handle it? Oh?
Stud get it? What do you mean? It's a popular program.
It helped people, helped people buy appliances. Didn't it help you?
I'm not gonna lose sleep over it. If that's what
you say, you're just not fej What are you gonna
do when it's time to buy a new refrigerator or
a new dishwasher, or a new something and there's no
Energy Star label on it? How are you gonna survive this?
I don't know how much electricity using. You're gonna cry
because you don't know how much energy is using? Oh? Yeah, yeah,
so I mean, I don't know how you people are
gonna survive out there. You're gonna go into the store,
You're gonna be looking around. Look, I don't want to
start naming names of stores because I might leave somebody
out wherever you shop for your fine appliances, Like if
you go to let's say that's Spy, or you go
to Target, or you go to Walmart, or you go
to Home people Lows and you know Amazon, and you
you look around for appliances and there's no government label
on it, and then are you gonna feel confident now
buying buying an appliance? Is this happening in the whole country? Yeah, everybody,
no more Energy Star, It's gone. It's done. The Trump
administration is attacking energy efficiency by taking away the labels
off your appliances.
Speaker 5: Well, I guess I'm glad to Canda Diet to get
like a dishwasher from now on or a fridge where
they would keep the program.
Speaker 4: I don't know. Canada may not have the energy program.
This is a United States part. It's the EPA. I
don't even know whether Canada has, And I don't know
how these people, if they don't have one, have been
living without an Energy Star program. How they live I
don't really understand. But speaking of Canada, thank you for that.
Because speaking of Canada, guess who showed up at the
White House today? Why it was a new PM of Canada, Well,
the new old PM. He was already the acting PM.
Now it's official. He's the elected PM of Canada. Mark
Kearney and Donald Trump. Yes, this is the one that
I sent you. That's not on the que sheet, Carlos.
So let's just here Donald Trump with and Carney is
sitting right next to him. During this exchange. Some people
say Carnie was squirming. I don't know whether he was
squirming or not. But let's just listen. The new PM
comes in and he didn't ask Trump about the Energy
Star thing either, which I just find shameful. We get
this news today. PM of Canada shows up, didn't ask
Trump about Energy Star. But this is what Donald Trump said.
Speaker 6: Yeah, no, no, well I still believe that. But you
know it takes two to tango, right, But no, I do.
I mean, I believe it would be a massive tax
cut for the Canadian citizens. You get free military, you
get tremendous medical cares and other things. There would be
a lot of advantages, but it would be it would
be a massive tax cut, and it's also a beautiful
you know, as a real estate developer. You know, I'm
a real estate developer at heart. When you get rid
of that artificially drawn line, somebody drew that line many
years ago with like a ruler, just a straight line
right across that top of the country. When you look
at that beautiful formation when it's together. I'm a very
artistic person. But when I looked at that, you know,
I said, that's the way it was meant to be.
But you know it's I just I do feel it's
much better for Canada. But we're not going to be
discussing that unless somebody wants to discuss it. I think
that there are tremendous benefits to the Canadian citizens, tremendously
lower taxes, free military which honestly, we give you essentially
anyway because we're protecting Canada if you have had a problem.
But I think, you know, it's it would really be
a wonderful marriage because it's it's two places. They get
along very well, They like each other a lot well.
Speaker 7: If I mean in real estate, there are some places
that are never for sale. We're sitting in one right now,
you know, bucking and Palace you visited as well, and
having met with the owners of Canada over the course
of the campaign last several months, it's not for sale,
won't be for sale ever. But the opportunity is in
the partnership and.
Speaker 4: What we can build together.
Speaker 7: And we have done that in the past. And part
of that, as the President just said, is with respect
to our own security, and my government is committed for
a step change in our investment in Canadian security and
our partnership. And I'll say this as well, that the
President has revitalized international security, revitalized NATO and us playing
our full weight in NATO, and that will be parts.
Speaker 4: Yeah. So after the public remarks, and the public remarks
lasted about a half an hour before the camera's a
bunch of questions and all that, they went to a
private working lunch along with their top advice orders and
the ministers from the new Canadian government. And we don't
know what was discussed in there. Donald Trump did say,
though we we protect Canada militarily and we always will.
We're not gonna you know, it's not a money thing.
We're always gonna protect Canada. But it's not fair. But anyway,
so they're making nice. They are making nice. Now the
liberals are driving themselves banana Nana, Banana, rama nana over
this idea that every illegal immigrant into the United States
should have due process. We have what quote unquote due
process because they never tell you exactly what due process is.
So on today the fastest our media, we are going
to take a look at some of the remarks to
to be made about that in the New York area
of across the across the river, across the Hudson, and
then a little bit further. Well, I don't yes across
the Hudson, but I wouldn't go through the Lincoln Tunnel.
I'd probably well, I might get to Newark, Nork, New Jersey.
Now Nork, New Jersey has a mayor, ros Baraka. To me,
that is like one of the best names of a
mayor ever. It sounds like a Marvel character. Ros Baraka.
He is. He is the son, I believe of the
poet from the the late poet out of New Jersey
in Mama Baraka, whose real name was his first name
was Leroy Jones before I'm not making this up. Before
he changed his name to Amma Baraka now and Mama
Broacco is very well known but left this. But yeah,
nice for all intention and purposes. A nice guy from
what I understand them. But the son, Rosparaka, it's son
relatively is running New York these days. I don't know,
mister t I don't know. Don't confuse me anyway, Rosparaka,
it sounds like a Marvel name. So we have illegal
immigrants being housed over in the Delaney. It's called the
Delaney whatever it is, center for Illegal Immigrants studies or whatever.
And liberals are having a cow. If you deport them,
liberals have a cow. If you detain them, liberals have
a cow. If you send them to Old Salvador, liberals
have a cow. No matter what you do, liberals have
a cow. So anyway, mister Baraka and others, and they,
mister Baraka tried to get into this it's all fenced off.
Tried to let a group of politicians over there, and
elderly protesters. They tried to break into place and it
didn't work. But then you had a bunch of them.
They looked like holdover from the nineteen sixties protests. You
had a bunch of people. This is cut nine protesting
outside of the Landy Hall Detention Center in Newark On
behalf of the illegal immigrants that are being detained there
awaiting deportation. And this is what it sounded like. Cut nine, Yes,
cut nine. I said that already. Let my people day.
Speaker 8: My people say, review, geez walk.
Speaker 9: Youre shu.
Speaker 7: Let my people say.
Speaker 4: Yeah, refugees work to a sure, Let my people stay.
Let my people stay. My people so didn't change anything.
They're still there and they are staying inside the detention
center until they are let go back home. James Golden
is slurbly. Everything's everything, Keep it right here.
Speaker 2: The Rush Hour with James Golden on the Red Apple
Podcast Network. The Rush Hour with James Golden, entertaining and informative.
Speaker 3: On the Red Apple Podcast Network.
Speaker 4: Now liberals are having a cow. I loved what I
read in the Los Angeles Times today. Trump wants to
reopen Alcatraz. Californians are deeply skeptical. The proposal, which would
be extraordinarily expensive and logistically challenging, drew derision, derision from
locals and from tourists. Well they're not just great. Maybe
we are the base all policy based on what the
tourists think, I mean, the tourists vote. Go figure. The
chances of Alcatraz being repurposed, repurposed as a prison or
about as large as landing a man on Pluto, says
Aaron Petkin, a former member of the San Francisco Board
of Supervisors. Really, if I had my way, there would
only be one prisoner in the place, and that would
be Donald Trump. And it goes on and on from
these leftists. But I love this. The idea is that
it's too expensive. It is too expensive to reopen Alcatraz.
I'm gonna talk about that expensive when we get back.
Most nermous, Rush Hour, Don't.
Speaker 2: Go Away, The Rush Hour with James Golden on the
Red Apple Podcast Network. The Rush Hour with James Golden,
Entertaining and informative on the Red Apple Podcast Network.
Speaker 4: Flashback last week, ill hand, Ohmad?
Speaker 8: Congress vant omar on Miles Morrell with the Daily Caller
News Foundation. Do you think more of your Democratic colleague
should be traveling to El Salvador to advocate on behalf
of a Vindego Garcia Iry?
Speaker 10: What Congressman?
Speaker 8: Who should you?
Speaker 4: Why me?
Speaker 10: I'm not taking any more questions right now, but here
you go.
Speaker 8: Yeah, thanks, thank you.
Speaker 11: Leader.
Speaker 12: Last week, Congresswoman Elhana Omar pursed out a reporter for
asking a question about House Democrats.
Speaker 9: Traveling to El Salvador.
Speaker 3: Do you condemn her a rhetoric?
Speaker 4: I haven't seen that.
Speaker 3: Well, it's appropriate for any member of.
Speaker 4: Your conference or any conferences to kind of verbally.
Speaker 13: Is it appropriate for Donald Trump to attack people the
way that he has repeatedly attacked folks? This is the
president of the United States of America. That's the question
that I'd be happy to answer at any point in time,
because his statements have been in the public domain that
have been outrageous, unethical, filled with lies for eight years,
and I'm in a pretty comfortable place because we're all
familiar with them. I didn't see that exchange with ilhan Omar.
Speaker 4: Thanks, thank you, Minority Leader Vakim Jeffries. Liberals, Okay, let's
start with the fun attacks. Lil're just gonna go right down.
I'm just gonna randomly pick things from the audio surprise
that we have today. Let's start with Jasmine number one.
Let's just hear Jasmine's latest.
Speaker 10: Because they've been working and they've been doing the jobs,
then now they want to roll back child labor protections
and make sure that poor children are the ones that
are doing those jobs, because now we're gonna have those vacancies,
if we're gonna have jobs left at all, as we
continue to endure the grind of this failed experiment around this.
Speaker 14: Teara for I want to ask you the US Department.
Speaker 4: Of Okay, so just stops there, just stop there. It's
Jake Tapper and he doesn't even address the lunacy. So Republicans, now,
if you if we get her right, and that's because
it's trying to follow this so called thinking, if that's
what you want to call it, it's difficult. But if
we're hearing this properly, Republicans not want to get rid
of child labor laws so that children, poor children in particular,
can be put to work because of tariff somehow, I'm
not sure. Maybe I got it wrong, Maybe you are
hearing it just one more time. Let's just listen and
see what Jasamine Crockett is saying.
Speaker 10: Why because they've been working and they've been doing the jobs,
then now they want to roll back child labor protections
and make sure that poor children are the ones that
are doing those jobs. Because now we're going to have
those vacancies, if we're going to have jobs left at all,
as we continue to endure the grind of this failed experiment.
Around this, Tarafar, I want to ask.
Speaker 4: You the US Department that just okay, thank you, Representative
Veronica Escobar. I don't know whether she's should I even
ask if she's reltten. No, I'm not gonna no, I
won't ask if she Veronica Escobar was questioning Chris Dynome,
who has the nickname in some quarters now Ice Barbie
Chris Dynome about children being deported, and this is what
that sounded like. Cut to three.
Speaker 11: I'd like to now focus on US citizens who were deported,
in fact three children so far likely more children. One
of those children with cancer who was deported without the
medication necessary to address that child's cancer, again a US citizen.
The lawyers have said that they were not given the
family was not given an opportunity to make plans for
the kids, and so they were deported essentially again US citizens.
I have a question about the forms that ICE is
supposed to utilize when engaging with parents who had children
who the parents who are being deported and the US
citizen children. One of those forms is ICE form seventy
one DASH zero seven eight or the caregiver designation at
a rest form. Were any of the individuals who were
deported who had US citizen children deported with them, were
they given an opportunity to sign that form?
Speaker 12: When these the specific cases that you're referencing with these children,
it was the parent's choice to.
Speaker 11: Take them, and did I which sold all on a
polication to keep families together? Man, man, man reclaiming my time?
I told you at the top of this man, Mam,
reclaiming my time, I said that the questions are really simple,
yes or no?
Speaker 1: Were these was that?
Speaker 4: So this woman pontifications No, this woman pontificates for three minutes,
the wandering into a point, and then as soon as
you start the answering, no, no, no, this is me.
We reclaiming my time, reclaiming my tain, Miss Escobar. Okay.
A certain sound bite speak for themselves means. It means
when you when you are a congress person and you're
at a hearing, you have an allocation of time that
you have. So for instance, in some hearings, each congress
person will get five minutes and they only have five
minutes on that round. So when they say reclaiming my time,
that means shut up, you're taking my time to question you.
I want to use my time even though I'm asking
you questions. Shut up, I want to dominate. It's my time.
I only have five minutes and you're not gonna fill
a bust to me. So reclaiming my time, reclaiming.
Speaker 1: My time, it makes no sense whatsoever.
Speaker 4: It makes sense if you watch she spam.
Speaker 5: No, no, no, I'm saying that because she's there to
us questions get answered.
Speaker 4: Then she was asking questions will she doesn't want to answers.
All she wants to do is pontificate, make a point
and get it and get something that will go on TV.
So you know it's as why you want to click. Yeah,
exactly that version. Okay, This next one, my Friends Cut
six needs no explanation. It is Pam Bondi Pam Bondy
on Fox. I think she was with Martha mccoum. But
this speaks for itself.
Speaker 12: People in China don't get addicted to Fit and All
because they're shipping it to our still eighteen to thirty
four year old seventy five thousand Americans are dying every
year because of fentanyl. It is a weapon of mass
destruction in my opinion. It's destroying lives, it's costing our
taxpayers trillions of dollars, and it's killing our kids eighteen
to thirty four number one cause of death. The precursors
are all made in China. It's shipped to Mexico into
our country or through now India other routes ports of
entry usps coming into our country, and they're killing our kids.
And it's got to stop. And it takes one grain
a fentanyl. I put it in here to share you earlier.
You can barely see it. It looks like one brain.
This is salt, not fitanyl. One brain is all it
takes to kill an American citizen. And that's what these
people are doing.
Speaker 4: She was one Larry Kudlow. What's interesting about that weapon
of mass destruction? I would just refer you to those
in memory to a COVID. Moving on, Ceenn, I'm gonna
skip the CNN for now because I want to get
back to it. But I said before the break, and
this is gonna take a little while. Before the break,
I talked to you about the La Times article they
have liberals sneering at Donald Trump sneering over this Alcatraz
being reopened. I quoted this guy, Aaron Peskin, former member
of the San Francisco bought a supervisor. Chances of Alcatraz
being repurposed as a prisoner about as large as a
man landing on Pluto. He says, the only guy he
wants as a prisoner in there is is Donald Trump.
There others say he's not gonna get it approved. It's
you know, etcetera. So it's too expensive. It's too expensive.
So I want you to keep that in mind, this
line of thought that we're now hearing from California liberals.
It is too expensive. It is too expensive to reopen
Alcatraz and tourists. By the way, I don't like the
idea either, but California doesn't like the idea. So I
want to turn to something this is a little bit
lengthen we may cut it off. Cut twenty three. I
just want to remind you about this. This is Congresswoman
Congressman from California, Kevin Kylie and all the time keeps
saying it's too expensive to open Alcatraz.
Speaker 5: Much to provide an update on the non existent high
speed rail project.
Speaker 4: To open Alcatraz, California.
Speaker 5: As I've noted on this floor before, I've introduced a
resolution or legislation to cut off all future federal funding
for California High speed Rail. I was with Secretary Duffy
when he announced an investigation into where the recent federal
funding has actually gone, and I have called upon the
FBI Director Cash Battel to launch an investigation into what
happened to the seventeen billion dollars that has already been spent.
At this point, the cost of the project is estimated
to be about one hundred billion dollars more than it
was initially sold to the public. But we did get
some news this week, and maybe I've been a little
too unkind to high speed Rail. The new CEO, and
by the way, this is the fifth CEO, so there
have been five more CEOs than there have been riders.
Five CEOs, zero riders. The new CEO came out with
some exciting news. He announced that he has a goal
by the year two thousand and forty five of completing
the line going from Palmdale to Gilroy. So let's purse
that statement. A goal of two thousand and forty five
going from Gilroy Palmdale to Gilroy Well. Two thousand and
forty five is, of course, twenty years from now. I'll
note that when the project was passed in two thousand
and eight, it was supposed to be done the entire
thing by twenty twenty, So the whole thing was supposed
to be done five years ago. But now the CEO
is saying I've gotten okay, and.
Speaker 4: Then goes from there, he goes on from there. This
thing goes on for like four more minutes. You get
to drift. They won one hundred billion dollars. It was
not supposed to cost anywhere near this. They've already spent
seventeen billion dollars, not one train going anywhere. And you
have these people, these democrats, now mocking and sneering at
Donald Trump because he says, let's open reopened Alcatraz. Now
something interesting, something interesting about the crime numbers. Let's go
to cut eleven, Harry Enton se in In.
Speaker 14: Let's hear it all right, net approval rating handling crime.
Speaker 3: What do we have here?
Speaker 14: We have a positive rating for Donald Trump even in
the most recent polling.
Speaker 12: Look at that, at.
Speaker 14: Plus two points, far better than Joe Biden, who was
so far under water. My goodness, he was setting records
at minus twenty six points. You rarely ever see it.
So Donald Trump ran in part on law and order.
It was one of the reasons that he got elected.
And at this particular point, Americans like what they're hearing
from him on the issue of crime. And you see
this right here with a plus two net approval rating,
far better than Joe Biden left office with back in
twenty twenty four.
Speaker 4: He wasn't done. There's more dig this.
Speaker 5: What about just how people are, how worried people are
actually about crime?
Speaker 4: About this exact issue.
Speaker 3: Yeah, exactly right, Kate.
Speaker 14: So you know we think about crime when we say, Okay,
it's one thing how they're viewing Trump, but are their
views of overall crime changing as Donald Trump gets into
the White House. And what do we see here, Well,
the percentage of Americans who worry a great deal about crime.
We actually have seen that percentage drop over the last year.
It was fifty three percent last year, and look at
where we are now, We're at forty seven percent. It's
the first time in about five years in which the
percentage of Americans who worry a great deal about crime
has actually dropped under the fifty percent mark. And more
than that, it's a rare issue that we've seen from
twenty twenty four to twenty twenty five in which the
percentage of Americans who worry a great deal about a
particular issue has actually dropped by five points or more.
In fact, it's one of only two issues in which
we saw five point decline among both Democrats and Republicans.
So I think Donald Trump is going to continue on
this law and order issue because the bottom line is
it is working for me.
Speaker 4: Meanwhile, California liberals are sneering it's tv expensive to open
up our cachaz again. Really, everything that comes out of
their mouth is negative. We can't do it. We can't
get rid of criminals. Oh no, no, we can't. We
can't open up the prison again. It's too complex, it's
too difficult. We can't do it. These people are negative
through and through. James Golden, snow ly fastest Hour in
media continues The.
Speaker 2: Rush Hour with James Golden on the Red Apple Podcast Network.
The Rush Hour with James Golden entertaining and informative.
Speaker 3: On the Red Apple Podcast Network.
Speaker 4: Folks, there's a story here that we must do today,
American manufacturers overwhelmed with orders after Trump's tariff crackdown on China.
American manufacturers manufacturers are seeing a surge surge in demand.
They're not torn between two lovers, a surge in demand.
They point out Jurgen's Ink, a Midwest tool maker with
less than five hundred employee. He says it's going like gangbusters
to try to keep up with demand. Wall Street Journal
reported they're seeing an influx of orders from customers trying
to avoid import tariffs. We're running twenty four hours a day,
seven days a week, says their president. We're swamped Grand
River rubbers and plastic, not those kind of rubbers. Torn
between two lovers at plastics and rubber manufacturer. All, well,
maybe they do make those kind of rubbers anyway. They
said that their customers, once off short to China, are
now reversing courts. Two buyers who left years ago returned
within days of each other. The new oil filter manufacturers
have already placed orders. The company's new business could amount
to five million dollars annually, roughly ten percent increase of
their revenue. And it goes on. Jobs and factories will
come roaring back into our country and you see it
already happening. Donald Trump has said it is happening. Folks.
May God blessed protect each and every single one of you,
your family, your loved ones, God willing. We are back
tomorrow for the Wednesday edition of both Surdlease Rush Hour.
Until then, my friends, I bid you, I do bye.
Speaker 9: Thanks for listening to Bo Stirdley's Rush Hour. You can
hear Bo Snurdley's Rush Hour weekdays at four on seventy
seven WABC. If you like the podcast, share it with
your friends and listen anytime at WABC radio dot com
and download the WABC Radio app. Hit that subscribe button
on all major podcast platforms. Plus, follow WABC on social
on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and X see you next time
for a new episode, so you never have to wonder
Speaker 4: What the heck is going on here