Speaker 1: Imagine a glass case spotlighted in a dimly lit historic
Japanese residence, and inside you see something that looks like
it was pulled right from the pages of a frightening
fairy tale. Oh this is good. Mumma Phi's remains. They
were allegedly found two centuries ago, and they have webhands,
scaly skin, and a physique that, honestly, it just defies
any known terrestrial biology.
Speaker 2: And this actually happened.
Speaker 1: May twenty fourteen, the world gets a public glimpse of
something truly legendary, something that smells of ocean myth and
deep river terror.
Speaker 2: Wow.
Speaker 1: We are talking about the historic Miyakana Joshimazu residence in
Japan where this truly peculiar artifact was put on public display.
Mummified remains, the supposed mummifhied remains of a creature alleged
to be the infamous Japanese water demon, the Kapa.
Speaker 2: The Kappa, right, I've heard of it.
Speaker 1: And this wasn't just you know, folklore. This was physical,
tangible evidence reported to be from a sea animal with
webbed hands and feet. It's a bridge that, for some
researchers connects fantastical legend to a very unsettling biological reality.
Welcome to thrilling threads.
Speaker 2: And today the snack of sources you've shared with me
forces us to launch a pretty extraordinary global investigation.
Speaker 1: It really does.
Speaker 2: Our mission is to really extract the key insights and
you know, the line of reasoning presented by ancient astronaut
theorists the AATs on the existence of intelligent aquatic humanoids.
We're analyzing sources that aggressively connect Japanese river monsters to
ancient Syrian goddesses and even West African cosmology.
Speaker 1: It's a huge leap.
Speaker 2: It's a huge leap all centered around challenging our established
timeline of evolution and life on Earth.
Speaker 1: That's right, and we are relying heavily on the detailed
accounts and commentary presented in the History Channel's analysis.
Speaker 2: A great source for this stuff.
Speaker 1: Specifically excerpt from their video Webbed Hands Scaly Skin. What
is this s one? Ancient aliens origin? And the core
question put forward by the expert commentators guiding its people
like Dominic Steve who Ken, Gerard, David Wilcock, Coleman, and
George Suklos is the most provocative one. It always is
are these creatures indigenous to Earth, maybe some lost advanced
branch of marine life, or did they come here by
some extraterrestrial means?
Speaker 2: And that's the whole discussion, isn't it. Our deep dive
today really demands that we look beyond our own skepticism
just for a moment and genuinely follow the aat logic
we have to. We need to focus on the factual
nuggets within the folklore, the specific complex physical descriptions, the
arrival narratives, and then trace that line of reasoning.
Speaker 1: See how the gef from point A to point B.
Speaker 2: Exactly how do these theorists get to their non terrestrial conclusions.
They argue that across continents in millennia, we find these
accounts of a powerful, intelligent species that has been monitoring
or maybe even guiding human.
Speaker 1: Development and doing it from the water.
Speaker 2: Operating primarily from the deepest, least exploded parts of our planet,
the water.
Speaker 1: So we're going to build this case for you piece
by piece, starting with that physical anomaly. Let's unpack this
by starting right where the evidence hits the surface. Japan
twenty fourteen and the enduring legend of the Kappa.
Speaker 2: Let's do it.
Speaker 1: So the story begins with this very recent public display,
which is a fascinating lens to view a very old.
Speaker 2: Myth, right, because it brings it into the modern day.
Speaker 1: The source describes the artifact as the mummified remains of
a creature allegedly a Kappa. This exhibition, taking place at
the Miyakinosro Schmazo residence, wasn't necessarily about scientific verification.
Speaker 2: It was more of a cultural event exactly.
Speaker 1: It was about presenting a significant historical artifact that just
has this astonishing backstory.
Speaker 2: And what gives the remains such historical weight, regardless of
their ultimate authenticity, is the alleged discovery date, which was
eighteen eighteen. That's the story. These remains were purportedly found
after the creature had been shot near a local river.
So it wasn't a peaceful encounter, no, not at all,
which immediately frames the Kappa not as some distant mythological entity,
but as a hostile life form interacting pretty violently with
local populations.
Speaker 1: And for centuries, this artifact has been held up as
potential proof of this legendary water.
Speaker 2: Child Water Child.
Speaker 1: Right. The remains with those webbed hands and feet are
consistent with the traditional descriptions of an amphibious or sea animal.
It's the physical starting point for the whole AT hypothesis.
Speaker 2: It's the tangible thing you can point to exactly.
Speaker 1: And when we look at the physical description of the
kappa itself, according to the folklore detailed by Dominic Stevo
in our source material, it moves so far beyond the
simple natural evolution of a fish or a frog.
Speaker 2: Oh.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, it sounds like something I don't know, bioengineered. It's
full of contradictions.
Speaker 2: It's a remarkably specific description, and that specificity is absolutely
key to the AAT argument. While the literal translation of
kappa water child sounds.
Speaker 1: You know, a most cute, it sounds benign.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the creature's nature is anything but. According to traditions
recorded all across Japan, the kappa is usually about five
feet in height.
Speaker 1: Which puts it squarely in the humanoid ring.
Speaker 2: Squarely, but its physical composition is just bizarre. Its skin
is scaly, often described as blue or green, which you
could argue suggest adaptation to deep or murky water.
Speaker 1: Okay, that part makes sense, but.
Speaker 2: Then it also has a distinct turtle shell on its back,
a shell a shell, and most strikingly, a beak.
Speaker 1: A beak, that's the part that just doesn't fit. We
associate beaks with birds, you know, land and air creatures
or maybe some marine reptiles, right, But combining that with
a humanoid frame and webbed hands, while still allegedly allowing
for complex communication, that just raises immediate flags for these theorists.
Speaker 2: It does. The question becomes, if this thing evolved on Earth,
why these highly disparate traits all mashed together.
Speaker 1: It's like a platypus on steroids exactly.
Speaker 2: But the most crucial piece of anatomy, the detail that
truly separates the Kappa from standard cryptozoological myths and governs
its survival and power, has to be what they call
the water plate.
Speaker 1: This word gets really technical and frankly fascinating. Explain the
operational parameters of this water plate.
Speaker 2: Okay, So this is the detail that the AATs really
sees upon as evidence of a non terrestrial origin or
maybe a poorly adapted genetic design. The creature has a plate,
a crucial depression or saucer, right on the top of
its head, and this plate must always contain water.
Speaker 1: It's not optional.
Speaker 2: It is a fundamental, non negotiable requirement for its survival.
The consequence of spilling this water is immediate and total
loss of power.
Speaker 1: What does that mean? Loss of power?
Speaker 2: The Kappa can reportedly become paralyzed, unable to move, and
can actually die within a very short period of time.
If that water is lost or evaporates.
Speaker 1: That's a staggering evolutionary vulnerability.
Speaker 2: It's insane.
Speaker 1: I mean, think about it. If a species evolves naturally
in a wet environment, say a jungle or a river,
it develops defenses against dehydration. It doesn't develop a single
highly exposed catastrophic weakness like a bowl of water on
its head.
Speaker 2: It's like putting a self destruct button right on top.
If you were a predator, you'd know exactly where to strike.
Speaker 1: It's a design flaw.
Speaker 2: It raises a very important question. Why would an intelligent
five foot tall creature that supposedly evolved on Earth possess
such a fragile Achilles heel?
Speaker 1: And the at answer is.
Speaker 2: It didn't evolve here. The need for constant localized hydration
suggests a species that evolved on a world, a water planet,
where the atmosphere is vastly.
Speaker 3: Different, like fully saturated with moisture exactly, so when you
place that creature in Earla's relatively dry atmosphere, it requires
this water plate as a necessary, if dangerous adaptation to
maintain its physiological balance.
Speaker 1: It's not a natural feature.
Speaker 2: It's a life support system.
Speaker 1: And according to Ken Geerhard in the video, this highly
vulnerable yet intelligent creature uses its power for pretty malevolent purposes.
Speaker 2: That's the other side of it.
Speaker 1: It's categorized in folklore as a water demon, malevolent and.
Speaker 2: Quite violent, and this hostility is really why the legend
has persisted so strongly for so long. Gerhard noted the
specific warnings for children, right, Yes, children are told to
stay away from bodies of water because the Kappa will
physically drag them in and.
Speaker 1: Drown them, which is terrifying.
Speaker 2: It's horrifying. And if we accept the aat premise that
these myths are echoes of real interactions, then we're dealing
with a potentially hostile territorial aquatic species, one.
Speaker 1: That views humanity, particularly the vulnerable, as either prey or
a threat to their domain.
Speaker 2: Precisely.
Speaker 1: What stands out to me is the longevity and the
continuing relevance of this.
Speaker 2: Warning, it's not just an old story, right, even.
Speaker 1: In modern Japan. The source confirms that while the accounts
are rare, sightings reportedly still occur in remote areas they
mentioned the Fukuoka Prefecture they do, and that official persistence
is key. Signs are still posted near bodies of water
throughout Japan warning.
Speaker 2: Of the Kappa no way really.
Speaker 1: Yes, this isn't just a dusty myth confined to historical scrolls.
It remains an active part of local public awareness and caution.
Speaker 2: Wow. So it's a fascinating overlap of deep historical fear
and modern low level protocol.
Speaker 1: So if the creature is real, the critical element for
the theorists has to be its intelligence. Of course, David
Wilcock highlights that these creatures of the report is having
an unusual intelligence and as we mentioned, despite the beak,
they can reportedly speak.
Speaker 2: That's the real kicker.
Speaker 1: That ability to communicate, paired with a non terrestrial seeming
physique and an extreme biological vulnerability, it just shifts the
whole discussion.
Speaker 2: It does. It moves from a simple cryptid like a
bigfoot to a potential intelligence.
Speaker 1: Species and the ultimate proof which connects this two hundred
year old artifact to modern inquiry lies in the remains themselves.
The physical right willcock poses the core AAT question, Will
we find genetic markers that clearly show that it could
not be something from Earth?
Speaker 2: And that's the scientific hammer for this whole part of
the theory, isn't it.
Speaker 1: It has to be if these mummified remains allegedly from
eighteen eighteen were to be genetically sequenced.
Speaker 2: Assuming they aren't just an artful assembly of you know,
monkey and fish parts, which happened a fair point.
Speaker 1: But if they were sequenced and found to contain DNA
or molecular structures that fall outside our known biological classification systems.
Speaker 2: That would be the turning point.
Speaker 1: A huge one. It would validate the entire AAT query.
Is the Kappa indigenous to planet Earth? Or did its
ancestors arrive here from somewhere else?
Speaker 2: And the search for those markers is what elevates the
legend from a simple folklore warning to a potential biological
case study of non terrestrial life.
Speaker 1: A life that found a very precarious home in Earth's.
Speaker 2: Waters, And the focus ultimately is the possibility that this
intelligent aquatic species didn't evolve through the slow linear process
of terrestrial evolution we understand, but was introduced, introduced either
by design or by crash landing from somewhere else.
Speaker 1: Entirely, it's the first step in what they say is
a global pattern. The Kappa serves as the potential physical example, however,
contested the.
Speaker 2: Physical evidence here on Earth.
Speaker 1: So if this creature needs water to survive, where did
the idea that aquatic beings could arive from the sky
come from?
Speaker 2: And that's the next crucial piece of the puzzle, Because
the theory needs context. We have to move from the
specific tangible mummified remains in Japan to the historical accounts
of mermaid like creatures worldwide.
Speaker 1: Which AAT suggests provide the necessary context.
Speaker 2: The context for understanding the non terrestrial origin of these
aquatic humanoids. The Kappa might be local to Japan, but
the mythology of half human half fish entities is universal.
Speaker 1: But with an unexpected cosmic twist.
Speaker 2: And often overlooked cosmic twists.
Speaker 1: You know you instinctively assume mermaids are just as sea
base my.
Speaker 2: Right sailors seeing manatees.
Speaker 1: Exactly a cautionary tale for lonely sailors. But the earliest
accounts of mermaid like creatures. They reveal a shockingly direct
link not to the debotion, but to beings that came
down from the heavens.
Speaker 2: And here's where the global mythology starts to reveal what
could be a shared origin story. The source sites an
ancient Syrian narrative dating back as far as one thousand BC.
Speaker 1: The goddess of Targoddess the.
Speaker 2: Goddess of Targetus, and the story is highly specific and
often overlooked in modern retellings. She was a powerful celestial figure,
a goddess, but tragedy struck.
Speaker 1: And you have to detail that tragedy because it's what
explains the critical transition from sky to water.
Speaker 2: It's the whole key at Targoddess, according to the legend,
fell in love with a mortal shepherd, but in a
fit of well unintended violence or perhaps just great sorrow,
she caused his death.
Speaker 1: Oh Wow.
Speaker 2: Overcome by grief and profound shame, she decided to abandon
her divine celestial form, and her method of self concealment
was spectacular.
Speaker 1: She came down from the sky.
Speaker 2: She came down from the sky, dove into a lake
near Ascalon and transformed into a half fish, half human creature.
Speaker 1: The narrative structure there is just yeah, it's everything. She
is a celestial being first.
Speaker 2: An entity arriving from the sky.
Speaker 1: Yes, and only then after landing does she adopt the
aquatic form. She seeks out the water not because it's
her home, but because it serves as a method of
adaptation or in this case, hiding.
Speaker 2: Exactly. The transformation is triggered after her celestial arrival and
her subsequent earthly trauma, and the celestial connection isn't isolated either, right.
Speaker 1: Coleman in the Source Material mentions this.
Speaker 2: He does. Coleman notes that similar narratives exist in the
ancient classic authors from the Greeks to the Sumerians. You
see these tales of fish humanoids where there is a
very direct connection with the heavens.
Speaker 1: So this is where the ancient astronaut framework provides its synthesis.
Speaker 2: This is their bread and butter.
Speaker 1: Instead of assuming every culture independently created a myth about
a grieving goddess who turns into a fish, AATs look
for a single common denominator.
Speaker 2: A shared experience that was later translated into religious or
mythological narratives.
Speaker 1: So If the beings in these ancient myths are consistently
described as arriving from the sky before becoming aquatic, the
aat conclusion drawn by Coleman is pretty straightforward.
Speaker 2: It is these tales point to a feitch like creature
that comes from outer space.
Speaker 1: They interpret falling from the sky not as a metaphor
for divinity, but.
Speaker 2: As a literal description of an atmospheric entry, possibly a
crash landing or a controlled descent of a craft carrying
aquatic beings.
Speaker 1: That completely changes the context of these stories. If they
are skyfish rather than oceanfish, it implies an intelligence capable
of interstellar travel.
Speaker 2: Or at the very least, interplanetary travel, and the presence
of these myths across vastly separate cultures Syria, Greece, potentially
Summer suggests the phenomenon wasn't localized globally witnessed. It could
have been. And this wider implication, as the source suggests,
is the existence of something that may not even be
connected to our known biological world.
Speaker 1: So we're not just looking for an undiscovered evolved animal
like the Lockness monster.
Speaker 2: Not at all. We are potentially looking for an entire
biological class that either evolved elsewhere or was bioengineered and
then utilized Earth's vast water resources as their ideal habitat.
Speaker 1: Upon arrival, and that sequence is always the same, First
the arrival from the sky and only then the retreat
into the water.
Speaker 2: It reinforces the whole idea.
Speaker 1: It reinforces the idea that the aquatic environment might be
necessary for their survival.
Speaker 2: On Earth, maybe due to the physiological need for high pressure,
a specific temperature, or crucially constant overwhelming hydration just like.
Speaker 1: The caps fragile water plate demands.
Speaker 2: It creates a perfectly consistent narrative. From their point of view,
the terrestrial need for water in the AATVW is the
necessary result of a non terrestrial journey.
Speaker 1: So we have the potential physical evidence in Japan, right,
we have the mythological pattern of celestial arrival in the
Middle East. Now, to find the strongest case for an
intelligent aquatic extraterrestrial visitor, we have to find a tradition
that unites both that spectacular arrival narrative and the concept
of knowledge distribution, and that takes.
Speaker 2: Us from the rivers of Japan and the seas of
the Mediterranean to west Africa to West Africa, where the
Dogon people have preserved a tradition that, according to the
at community, contains evidence that simply cannot be explained away
by terrestrial mythology.
Speaker 1: For the ancient astronaut theorists, this is the big one.
It really is the most compelling evidence that humanoid sea
creatures not only existed, but came from beyond our Earth
is found in the deeply preserved origin tale of the
Nomo spirits of the Dogon people.
Speaker 2: So the Dogon, a powerful and ancient culture residing in Mali,
have these ancestral spirits. They call the Nomo the Nomo,
and crucially the Nomo we're not just you know, nature
spirits revolved animal. They were, according to their creation myth,
the very first living creatures created by the Dogon sky
god Amma.
Speaker 1: So that elevates them immediately.
Speaker 2: It elevates them to a foundational, almost proto human species
within their cosmology. It gives them immense authority, and.
Speaker 1: Their physical descriptions they aligned perfectly with the repeating theme
we've been tracking globally.
Speaker 2: They're described as amphibious, hermaphroditic, and highly fish like creatures.
Speaker 1: So this consistent pattern intelligent, water dependent, humanoid but fish
like entities across continents, from the five foot Kappa to
the grief stricken Acrogattis. It suggests a shared historical encounter.
Speaker 2: It's a compelling pattern. Now let's look at the arrival narrative,
which is just spectacular and forms the intellectual backbone of
the aat argument.
Speaker 1: George Sucolos in the source material he details this spectacular descent.
Speaker 2: He does the Nomo reportedly descended from the stars in
a vessel accompanied by fire and thunder.
Speaker 1: That does not sound like a gentle ethereal manifestation.
Speaker 2: No, this is a description of technology engaging with our atmosphere.
Sukolos describes the landing in dramatic, almost violent terms.
Speaker 1: A loud, noisy whirlwind.
Speaker 2: Yes, that made the earth shake when the vessel finally landed.
You can just picture the sensory experience intense heat, deafening sound,
massive turbulence, physical fourth.
Speaker 1: And Henry, another commentator, connects this account to other ancient
traditions of extraterrestrial beings, writing upon.
Speaker 2: Clouds, interpreting the cloud and the whirlwind as the exhaust
or disruption caused by a powerful spacecraft.
Speaker 1: Which immediately raises the question.
Speaker 2: If these accounts are descriptions of ancient technology a spacecraft
entering the atmosphere and landing, then, as Henry asks, did
the Nomo come from the stars? Were they extraterrestrial beings
that came to Earth specifically to teach the Dogon?
Speaker 1: And that's the key their function. According to Dogon traditions,
it was explicit they were called the monitors and the teachers.
Speaker 2: This role as instructors is a critical distinction from, say,
the violent Kappa. The source material states explicitly that the
Dogon's knowledge of everything was given to them by that
being that descended in a whirlwind from the sky.
Speaker 1: So if these were extraterrestrial visitors, they were not passive observers.
Speaker 2: Not at all. They were knowledge distributors and cultural architects,
providing fundamental understanding of agriculture, social structure, and, most importantly
for the aat case, astronomy and.
Speaker 1: The astronomical knowledge they allegedly possessed is where the story
truly becomes anomalous and frankly, very difficult to dismiss as
mere mythology.
Speaker 2: This is the serious b paradox. David Wilcock highlights the
remarkable scientific knowledge attributed to the Nomo.
Speaker 1: The Noomo reportedly described the stars serious as their point
of origin.
Speaker 2: Which is the brightest star on our night sky.
Speaker 1: Easy enough, easy enough, But they didn't just mention the bright,
easily visible star Serius A. The astounding detail is that
they reportedly possessed very active, curate information about a dwarf
star called Serious.
Speaker 2: B, a star that wasn't even known to Western astronomy
at the time their traditions were first recorded by French
ethnographers in the nineteen thirties.
Speaker 1: We really need to unpack why that knowledge is so astounding.
Speaker 2: Please do.
Speaker 1: Serious B is not visible to the naked eye. It's impossible.
It is a white dwarf companion to the much much
brighter Serious.
Speaker 2: A, and it's a marvel of physics. White dwarfs are
incredibly dense remnants of stars that have exhausted their nuclear fuel.
Speaker 1: I read that a spoonful of Serious B matter would
weigh many tons on Earth.
Speaker 2: That's the claim. So for the dug On to possess
accurate knowledge of this star, its invisible nature, its immense density,
and critically, its precise fifty year elliptical orbital period around
serious A that.
Speaker 1: Suggests knowledge far beyond what was possible without advanced instrumentation.
Speaker 2: Specifically powerful telescopes that Western science only began using to
verify this orbit accurately in the mid twentieth century.
Speaker 1: So the at interpretation is that this specific advanced knowledge
had to have been imparted by visitors who came from
that very star system.
Speaker 2: It's the only explanation that fits. In their view, no
terrestrial culture should have known about serious B. This specific
scientific detail, intertwined with a creation myth is often presented
as the ultimate smoking gun of the dogon mythology.
Speaker 1: Because it ties the origin story to verifiable astronomical fact
that was seemingly impossible for them to acquire on their own.
Speaker 2: And this is how the Nomo elevate the whole conversation.
The Kappa only gives us biological ambiguity, The Nomo gives
us advanced physics and a history of intervention.
Speaker 1: The dogal claim they received this knowledge from amphibious creatures
who arrive from the specific star system that knowledge describes.
It's a closed loop, it is, And let's bring it
all back to the central motif. The aquatic comparative. Immediately
upon landing after that spectacular entry of the fire and
thunder and exiting their craft. What did the Nomo do?
Speaker 2: They almost immediately got into the water, a most immediately.
Speaker 1: This action reinforces the global pattern we saw with the
grieving at Targattess and the persistent critical need for wire
exemplified by the Kappas water plate.
Speaker 2: Since the Noma were essentially fish like humanoids, the source concludes,
it seems that they needed to be in the water
for survival.
Speaker 1: The water wasn't a recreational stop.
Speaker 2: No, it was a critical necessity upon arrival.
Speaker 1: And the implication of that is profound. These intelligent beings
travel vast distances, survive an incredibly turbulent re entry, impart
advanced scientific knowledge that defies their technological era, and.
Speaker 2: Then reveal their true nature as amphibious creatures whose primary
immediate need is hydration.
Speaker 1: It implies a species evolved on an environment so different
from ours that our atmosphere is toxic or quickly fatal
to them.
Speaker 2: So when you synthesize all of this, the origin story,
the spectacular technological arrival, the role as teachers and monitors,
the unprecedented, verifiable astronomical knowledge of serious b and that
immediate need to enter the water.
Speaker 1: The final at conclusion is the only logical one within
their framework.
Speaker 2: The source material states it definitively, we are definitely dealing
with some sort of intelligent aquatic humanoid species that came
here as an extraterrestrial visitor from outer space.
Speaker 1: And that conclusion requires us to accept that the Nomo
myths are not just symbolic creation allegories.
Speaker 2: But accurate historical records of an alien species landing on Earth,
teaching early humans and establishing a sophisticated hidden base of
operations in our aquatic.
Speaker 1: Environments, hidden from the dry land based human world. Huge
claim it is, so let's briefly link the thrilling threads
we falled apart in our discussion today tracing the journey
from the physical to the celestial.
Speaker 2: Let's tie it all together.
Speaker 1: We started with the physical. Webed remains of the Japanese Kappa,
the territorial water child with scaly skin, and that fragile
water plate.
Speaker 2: Whose biological vulnerability suggests adaptation to a foreign environment.
Speaker 1: We move to the mythological evidence exploring the celestial connection
in ancient mermaid myths, where deities like Etar Goddis are
explicitly documented as arriving from the sky before diving into lake.
Speaker 2: Marking water is a necessary destination, not an origin point
on Earth.
Speaker 1: And we finished with the numbo of the Dogon, who
provide the highest level of aat evidence, the spectacle of
star travel, the undisputed role as ancient teachers.
Speaker 2: And the precise accurate knowledge of the invisible serious B
star system, all confirming an origin story from beyond.
Speaker 1: Earth blinked inexorably to the immediate need for water upon landing.
Speaker 2: The underlying powerful thread running through all three segments is
what we're calling the aquatic imperative right.
Speaker 1: The theory that intelligent aquatic species are not just mythological
but perhaps non terrestrial visitors who used Earth's massive oceans
and rivers as a necessary base, a hiding place, or
a functional habitat.
Speaker 2: So if we accept the premise that these multiple separate
cultures Japan, Syria, West Africa all have have these deeply
ingrained traditions of intelligent fifh like humanoids who came from
the sky and immediately salt water, we.
Speaker 1: Had to consider the vast implications for exobiology.
Speaker 2: We do, what does this consistent global tradition say about
the potential uniformity of life that could develop on water
rich planets.
Speaker 1: Beyond Earth, that's a great question.
Speaker 2: If these beings capable of interstellar travel are always depicted
as amphibious or dependent on aquatic environments, perhaps the dominant
form of intelligence in the cosmos is water based.
Speaker 1: Using land only for brief exploration or teaching purposes, while
maintaining permanent residence in the deep blue exactly. And this
raises a profound final thought for you to ponder something
that builds on the necessity of that water plate and
the Dogonznomo. Okay, if these noomo traveled across the gulf
of space and immediately needed to immerse themselves, does this
suggest they evolved on a planet fundamentally different from ours,
like a super Earth entirely covered in water, a water
world where land masses in dry air are fatal, maybe
even corrosive. If the Kappa's alleged intelligence and the no
most accurate knowledge of Series B are rooted in historical encounters,
then we have.
Speaker 2: To ask are these creatures ancient cautionary tales warning children
away from rivers or.
Speaker 1: Are they historical records pointing toward an intelligent aquatic species
that still monitors Earth from its deep blue hidden vantage point.
Speaker 2: That's the question.
Speaker 1: We've presented the sources and followed the framework now based
on the myths and claims we've unpacked today, from the
mummified Kappa to the Nomo star charts, where do you
fall in the question of the aquatic comparative? Let us
know what you think Until next time, Keep those threads thrilling.