Speaker 1: This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. A lot to
Speaker 1: do today nationally and locally. But come on, hey, we're
Speaker 1: in the shadow of now. You can reach out, you
Speaker 1: can touch it. This election with out question. You know,
Speaker 1: we'll end up, you know, setting a path for America
Speaker 1: probably for decades to come, because it will be stuff
Speaker 1: that happens in the next four years depending on who
Speaker 1: wins that that simply cannot be easily unwound. And so yeah,
Speaker 1: plenty to talk about as we add into that. The
Speaker 1: good news is that so much of the data points
Speaker 1: to a Trump victory, with plenty of suggestions that it
Speaker 1: might be a pull away type of victory that might
Speaker 1: pick up some extra GOP Senate seats and House seats,
Speaker 1: but certainly not a done deal at this point. One
Speaker 1: thing I want to get your take on is, Okay,
Speaker 1: so they obviously have been blasted out of the bunker, right,
Speaker 1: and so Biden was able to get away with being
Speaker 1: in the basement. You know, all the way through the campaign,
Speaker 1: Harris wasn't able to pull that off. And we all
Speaker 1: know the reasons why we've talked about it a bunch.
Speaker 1: So they know now that she's losing. They know now
Speaker 1: on the current trajectory, she's going to lose, which is
Speaker 1: the only way they're taking this risk of putting her
Speaker 1: up there. But now that you're starting to see a
Speaker 1: bunch of her, you know, what do you think the
Speaker 1: net's going to be on that? Do you think it's
Speaker 1: going to help or hurt her? And I know it
Speaker 1: may sound like a silly question, right because my guess
Speaker 1: is you see her accurately as I do, and most
Speaker 1: of the folks on this show or who call the
Speaker 1: show or text the show, whatever, do and can see that,
Speaker 1: you know, red Jersey, blue Jersey aside, she just obviously
Speaker 1: is one of the least qualified people that we've ever
Speaker 1: seen be a major party nominee for president, and more importantly,
Speaker 1: just wholly unqualified to do the job. And you know,
Speaker 1: I think that's more than obvious. But if you try
Speaker 1: to put your shoeself in the shoes of the more
Speaker 1: typical American voter, you know who's a smart person.
Speaker 2: They're a busy person.
Speaker 1: They just don't they're not interested in politics the way
Speaker 1: people who listen to a show like this are, et cetera.
Speaker 1: And all they know now is that, Okay, she's out
Speaker 1: there a lot more now. Does she gain just by
Speaker 1: being out there a lot more now? Because obviously you
Speaker 1: can't elect somebody president who's afraid to go do an interview,
Speaker 1: et cetera. So no matter how bad those interviews are,
Speaker 1: is it actually a net gain for her?
Speaker 2: Would love your take on that.
Speaker 1: Eight five five for zero five eight two five five
Speaker 1: the number text d an five seven seven three nine,
Speaker 1: As always, will go deep into the polling, though, you know,
Speaker 1: at this point in a campaign it gets it gets
Speaker 1: a little bit weird because you get all these polls
Speaker 1: generated by left leaning or right leaning entities that are
Speaker 1: meant to influence behavior rather than to measure it, and
Speaker 1: it's hard to separate out the effect of those from
Speaker 1: the very few legitimate polls. So pulling over the next
Speaker 1: few weeks is going to be I think a little
Speaker 1: more dicey, and it's going to be magnified by the
Speaker 1: exploding head effect and what we've been talking about and
Speaker 1: seeing and predicting for a long time that as it
Speaker 1: gets closer and closer and more and more clear that hey,
Speaker 1: there is a real chance Trump will win, and you
Speaker 1: know my view, I think it's likely he'll win. You know,
Speaker 1: at that point, you're going to see the left doing
Speaker 1: wilder and crazier things. In fact, they're going to start
Speaker 1: the show today with one of those. And also because
Speaker 1: it may be on your radar, because the left is
Speaker 1: trying to generate a lot of headlines with this because
Speaker 1: they are so desperate, right they can't win on the issues,
Speaker 1: and their normal tactics aren't working, so they're claiming that
Speaker 1: President Trump. They're claiming President Trump had some kind of
Speaker 1: major disqualifying medical event last night during a rally, actually
Speaker 1: a town hall in Pennsylvania, when the truth is nothing
Speaker 1: of the sort occurred. But the fact that they're trying
Speaker 1: to go there is just well, it's so much fun
Speaker 1: and it's so encouraging because it shows how.
Speaker 2: Desperate they are.
Speaker 1: But I do want to start with that because it
Speaker 1: does need to be clarified. And the beautiful thing here
Speaker 1: is that even ABC News stepped down on behalf of
Speaker 1: Trump and said, no, this is absolute nonsense. So let's
Speaker 1: pick up the CNN reporting on this where they're talking
Speaker 1: about and this is after Kamala Harris herself, in one
Speaker 1: of her own tweets, triggered all of this by tweeting
Speaker 1: out about Trump and showing a really misleading snippet of
Speaker 1: video from the Pennsylvania town hall, tweeted.
Speaker 2: Out are you okay? Question mark?
Speaker 1: And it was again, it was just so profoundly dishonest
Speaker 1: the way, first of all, the way the video was edited,
Speaker 1: but then secondly the fact that the simple truth, which
Speaker 1: cannot be denied or contradicted by anybody is there was
Speaker 1: no hint of a medical issue for Trump.
Speaker 2: He was in fact pausing the.
Speaker 1: Q and A and terminating early the town hall because
Speaker 1: of two people in the crowd who had medical events.
Speaker 1: And instead Trump just had music played and he was
Speaker 1: up there kind of doing a DJ thing. So here's
Speaker 1: David Shehallion on CN it what we saw there.
Speaker 3: Because there are a lot of ways to look at it,
Speaker 3: and it really depends on who you ask. Let's just
Speaker 3: start with team Trump. You know, they argue, well, he
Speaker 3: can have fun, well there is joy there, and then
Speaker 3: team Harris, he's completely lost it. And I'll get to
Speaker 3: the second part in a minute. But you know, he
Speaker 3: was supposed to be taking questions. He then went off
Speaker 3: into whatever that.
Speaker 4: Was after there were a couple of medical incidents in
Speaker 4: the crowd in the very hub environment. And yeah, people
Speaker 4: think it exactly, And so he sort of pivoted the event.
Speaker 2: Yeah, pivoted the event. Right, This was no medical issue for.
Speaker 4: Him, obviously, Let's be clear, that's not normal behavior for
Speaker 4: a candidate, right, Like, we've not seen that, and I
Speaker 4: think you can find people that have covered Donald Trump,
Speaker 4: like have gone to more than one hundred Donald Trump.
Speaker 4: They've never seen that. So we should just separate that
Speaker 4: out that you know, here we are three weeks out
Speaker 4: from an election and he's doing something that he's never
Speaker 4: done before.
Speaker 1: And that's a second think about how desperate they are.
Speaker 1: First of all, with Trump. That's how he became president.
Speaker 1: That's the reason that we even know him. He doesn't
Speaker 1: do things the normal way, and that's worked out very
Speaker 1: well for the country for the most part and his presidency.
Speaker 1: So now they're so desperate to try to do something
Speaker 1: to blunt his momentum that they know they can't just
Speaker 1: come out and say, oh, yeah, that was a medical event.
Speaker 1: It'siter because they know that's a lie, but they have
Speaker 1: to try to give that implication. And their basis is
Speaker 1: that we haven't seen him do that before. We haven't
Speaker 1: seen him stand on stage and just play music forft
Speaker 1: an hour. Yeah, because he hasn't had two people in
Speaker 1: his crowd keel over before. And by the way, and
Speaker 1: you'll hear it in the ABC explanation that follows here,
Speaker 1: he had done Q and A for for a good
Speaker 1: long time, you know, before two people in the crowd
Speaker 1: had those issues. Now here's ABC and credit ABC, which
Speaker 1: has been an extension of the Harris campaign often i e.
Speaker 1: The so called debate in a very dishonest way. But
Speaker 1: ABC at least getting this one right.
Speaker 5: But then, thirty minutes in, two attendees suffered medical emergencies.
Speaker 6: A doctor plus doctor.
Speaker 2: The incidents shifted the mood, prompting Trump to.
Speaker 5: Cut the question short and instead play some of his
Speaker 5: favorite music.
Speaker 7: How about this, We will play YMCA and you'll go home.
Speaker 5: Trump kept DJing, and most of his supporters stayed for
Speaker 5: another thirty minutes. Of his players, well, in certain quarters
Speaker 5: of social media, people had a field day with that.
Speaker 5: And I guess on the screens.
Speaker 2: It might have looked quite.
Speaker 8: Strange inside that hall. However, people were having a good time.
Speaker 2: What can I tell you? It did not seem out
Speaker 2: of the order. It seemed almost intimate. And at the end.
Speaker 5: Trump did something he very rarely does. He came down
Speaker 5: off the stage and mingled with his supporters. He was
Speaker 5: signing autographs and shaking.
Speaker 2: Hands and the light.
Speaker 1: You always love it when your opponent gets desperate, right,
Speaker 1: and not only is lying but telling wild, desperate lies
Speaker 1: that are easily disproved. Yeah, we have reached that very
Speaker 1: fun stage of and you can't even call it a
Speaker 1: race at this point. Right, Trump already won the race
Speaker 1: against Biden, so he's already beat the Democrat nominee. Then
Speaker 1: you saw the coup, and now they get a mulligin
Speaker 1: and he's in the process of overtaking the Mulligan candidate.
Speaker 1: And so now I don't know that you can say
Speaker 1: it's head's exploding. Now it's going to be like whole
Speaker 1: lefty bottom. He's exploding for the next twenty one days.
Speaker 1: So hey, it's going to be one of the best
Speaker 1: times in your life. Eight five to five for zero
Speaker 1: five eight two five five text DN five seven seven
Speaker 1: three nine. You're on the Dan Kapler Show.
Speaker 7: And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 9: I mean, the top line is the five point advantage
Speaker 9: that Kamala Harris had in our last boll is gone.
Speaker 2: What's behind that chef?
Speaker 7: Yeah, exactly, Savan.
Speaker 9: I may just look at them side by side and
Speaker 9: you can see it.
Speaker 7: Remember that poll we took a month ago.
Speaker 9: That you see here, it was just after that first
Speaker 9: Trump Harris debate. Since then, we've had the VP debate,
Speaker 9: There've been some campaign activities, some interviews, some things that
Speaker 9: have changed in that time. I think this might be
Speaker 9: the biggest for Harris. We just asked the basic image
Speaker 9: perception people have, is it positive or negative?
Speaker 2: Of these candidates.
Speaker 9: The Trump number has always been somewhere in this territory.
Speaker 9: In fact, this is a little bit high for him,
Speaker 9: believe it or not. Forty three percent positive. But look
Speaker 9: at Harris forty three positive, forty nine negative. The significance
Speaker 9: We polled this a month ago, she was forty eight
Speaker 9: per positive and forty five negative.
Speaker 2: He was above water.
Speaker 9: As they say, that's completely reversed. It now looks very
Speaker 9: similar to Trump's. That's a pretty big shift when you're
Speaker 9: talking about erase this close.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but it's exactly what we've been talking about forever,
Speaker 1: right once people got to know or remember the real
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris, and how did that happen exactly because of
Speaker 1: the stuff you and I aren't seen.
Speaker 2: Now we see someone.
Speaker 1: We're watching, say football or maybe a playoff game Baseball,
Speaker 1: playoff game where we get some of those national ads
Speaker 1: where they're running these devastating ads on Kamala Harris. But
Speaker 1: the swing states are saturated with them, and there's never
Speaker 1: been more of this political ammo against a political opponent ever.
Speaker 1: And just think of the one ad We've talked a
Speaker 1: lot about it on the show, that the one ad
Speaker 1: that I think will go down as the most impactful
Speaker 1: ad in modern presidential history. You know, the ad where
Speaker 1: they've got Harris in her own voice saying that yes,
Speaker 1: she wants to use your taxpayer dollars to pay for
Speaker 1: sex change operations for prisoners, and then they give an
Speaker 1: example of one of those prisoners, and that's just crushing
Speaker 1: on multiple levels.
Speaker 2: So yeah, no.
Speaker 1: Wonder her popularity is going down, it's because of the
Speaker 1: truth and the truth about her eight five to five
Speaker 1: or is there a five A two five five, text
Speaker 1: D An five seven, seven through nine. Man, I do
Speaker 1: miss being a swing state, right, I mean there was
Speaker 1: when you get to see all these ads and all
Speaker 1: that stuff. But but yeah, and as we talked about before,
Speaker 1: after the debate, what would be there to break her fall?
Speaker 1: As the truth about Kamala Harris started to sink in nothing.
Speaker 1: That's why Trump again so wise not to agree to
Speaker 1: a third debate. Let me get to some text and calls.
Speaker 1: We'll start with Jack in Beautiful Cheyenne. You're on the
Speaker 1: Dan Kafli show.
Speaker 10: Welcome Jack, Dan, And we're trying to be as quick
Speaker 10: as I possibly can. And I know you always cut
Speaker 10: me off, so try.
Speaker 2: Not to do it this then all right, never mind.
Speaker 10: I am absolutely infensed that that Harris is using somebody
Speaker 10: by the name of Charlemagne. And here's here's where I'm
Speaker 10: coming from. The name, historically, charle Magne was a Frenchman
Speaker 10: who claimed to be emperor the Roman Empire in the
Speaker 10: eighth century. And that's that's legitimate, and that's historical, and
Speaker 10: that's what the name of Charlemagne is. I talked to Kelly,
Speaker 10: who's brilliant, and she told me that Charlemagne is a
Speaker 10: New York City tell radio commentator. He's adopted the name
Speaker 10: of Charlemagne. If he can't produce a birth certificate that
Speaker 10: has his first or last name is Charlemagne, then I'm
Speaker 10: going to go ahead and say to what the guy
Speaker 10: is doing. He's reaching back into history using the name
Speaker 10: that he thinks will give him credibility to go ahead
Speaker 10: and advance to the communist program of the Democrats. Now,
Speaker 10: don't I don't know what that is. I'm going to
Speaker 10: ask you to get to the bottom of it because
Speaker 10: you don't adopt. Okay, my name is Jack Chandstein.
Speaker 1: This is talk show host mail practice. I no offense.
Speaker 1: It's not personal. I should have cut you off in
Speaker 1: the first fifteen seconds. I should have cut you off
Speaker 1: at Charlemagne because you have called your smart guy. You've
Speaker 1: called this show with some really smart points in the past.
Speaker 1: But respectfully, how is this interesting anybody?
Speaker 11: Because it's a fraud.
Speaker 10: Perpetrated by the Democrats on everybody to give credit.
Speaker 1: Guys a talk show host, he's not part of the
Speaker 1: Harris campaign. He's been ripping the Harris campaign as much
Speaker 1: as he's ripped Trump. Yeah, Jack, No, I very much
Speaker 1: appreciate the call, and I say that just to be respectful.
Speaker 1: Eight five five or zero five eight two five five
Speaker 1: the number Jack has often called with great points to
Speaker 1: make we all have bad days. Dan Trump stopped for
Speaker 1: a medical event in the rees recent Pennsylvania event as well. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I got to remember. I mean, this is so interesting.
Speaker 1: CNN as is now trying to walk back that story.
Speaker 2: I just saw.
Speaker 1: Headline and c and where they're talking about how Trump
Speaker 1: swayed to the music after the event had ended, which
Speaker 1: they omitted from their original report. Just trying to carry
Speaker 1: water for the Democrats on this. Yeah, listen, The point
Speaker 1: is that Trump has such deep support. People get there.
Speaker 1: If somebody's near the front of one of their events,
Speaker 1: they probably started camping out in July for it, right,
Speaker 1: so they get there super early. And then his events
Speaker 1: are really really crowded, so you know, they tend to
Speaker 1: be warmer, and you know, you get some folks, I'm
Speaker 1: guessing these are probably older folks, and yeah, you get
Speaker 1: more people killing over at Trump events than other events.
Speaker 2: And can you imagine? Can anybody imagine what would.
Speaker 1: Be happening right now if Trump had just plowed through,
Speaker 1: If Trump had just plowed through when he's got people
Speaker 1: down in front of him, Oh, heartless drum. Trump doesn't
Speaker 1: care about his supporters, et cetera. The guy stops the
Speaker 1: event and just starts playing music. The last one I
Speaker 1: think in Pennsylvania started praying for the person who went down.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: No, but this is what I mean by you know,
Speaker 1: they're desperate, they know they're losing. They're absolutely desperate. Texted Dan,
Speaker 1: what would you be saying today if Kamala had stood
Speaker 1: swaying on the stage for thirty nine minutes. I have
Speaker 1: a feeling you'd have comments. He only took four questions
Speaker 1: before listen he had he ended the event because of
Speaker 1: medical emergency. And then as ABC described that, we played
Speaker 1: the ABC report, you know, out of respect for he
Speaker 1: enjoys being with the ABC described it as intimate connection
Speaker 1: with the folks who came out to see him. He
Speaker 1: stayed with them. He couldn't sit up there talking about
Speaker 1: the substance while you had people down, but he stayed
Speaker 1: with them. Yes, So again, I wish the Texter would
Speaker 1: call because we'd be able to explore deeper. You know
Speaker 1: this and imagine, I mean being kind about this. Imagine
Speaker 1: if you were on the other side of this right now,
Speaker 1: If you haven't agree with me on the stakes in
Speaker 1: this election and that it's critical that Trump win and
Speaker 1: the left loose for the future of America, Imagine if
Speaker 1: we were on the other side of this, and if
Speaker 1: we had all these indicators now that Harris was going
Speaker 1: to win, Think about how awful that would be.
Speaker 2: Think about the awful.
Speaker 1: Feeling you'd go to sleep with, you'd wake up with
Speaker 1: just the sense of dread because of how horrible it
Speaker 1: was going to be for the nation.
Speaker 2: Could she still win?
Speaker 1: Sure, come on, you know it's not over till it's over.
Speaker 1: But I think Trump would have to actively give it
Speaker 1: away for her to win, and I don't see any
Speaker 1: sign of that happening. I mean, sixteen and twenty. You know,
Speaker 1: he was a very very good closer. And no human's
Speaker 1: ever going to be perfect, not out on the campaign, certainly,
Speaker 1: no disruptor candidates is going to be perfect. But boy,
Speaker 1: Trump overall has been very very good. In fact, Ryan,
Speaker 1: I think he just taped today town hall women only
Speaker 1: town hall, and I think that's going to be broadcast tomorrow.
Speaker 1: By the way, when we come back, i'd love to
Speaker 1: get your take on this eight five five four zero
Speaker 1: five eight two five five the number you can text
Speaker 1: d A N five seven seven three nine. You've got
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris tomorrow sitting down with Brett Behar. It's going
Speaker 1: to be half an hour and it's going to be
Speaker 1: straight to tape, So it's going to be straight through
Speaker 1: this half hour, no commercial breaks during the tape, no
Speaker 1: breaks during the taping, right, and no commercial breaks when
Speaker 1: it's aired. Now, obviously a half hour is not that long.
Speaker 1: You would hope that the interview would be longer, but
Speaker 1: a half hour is enough to do some follow up because,
Speaker 1: as you well know, follow up is everything. The initial
Speaker 1: questions meaningless because a candidate can easily.
Speaker 2: Avoid that, but it's all in the follow up.
Speaker 1: And Brett Behar, I think, is going to follow up
Speaker 1: very well because you know, for Brett bear Tomorrow it's
Speaker 1: his reputation on the line. So yes, he's going to
Speaker 1: be very careful to appear very fair to her. But
Speaker 1: at the same time, nobody wants to be thought of
Speaker 1: as a whimp. Nobody wants to be thought of as
Speaker 1: as somebody who is two weak to ask the tough questions.
Speaker 2: So I want to hear from.
Speaker 1: You if you could be Brettbaar tomorrow or give him
Speaker 1: a question to pose to errors.
Speaker 2: More importantly, the follow up, what would it be?
Speaker 1: Eight five five four zero five A two five five
Speaker 1: text d am five seven seven three nine year on
Speaker 1: The Dan Kaplas Show.
Speaker 7: You're listening to the Dan Kapliss Show podcast.
Speaker 9: The point of the fact she's the VP in an
Speaker 9: unpopular administration. We asked about President Biden's policies, are they
Speaker 9: helping or hurting your family? Just a quarter of voters
Speaker 9: said they're helping, nearly have said they're hurting.
Speaker 2: And then here's the interesting twist.
Speaker 9: We also asked folks think back to when Donald Trump
Speaker 9: was president, did his policies help or hurt your family?
Speaker 9: And look at the difference forty four percent helping, thirty
Speaker 9: one hurting. Trump's the retrospective, you would say, opinion of
Speaker 9: Trump's presidency among voters arguably higher now than when he
Speaker 9: was president.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so what do we have And listen, you can
Speaker 1: find a poll here there that disagrees with the arc.
Speaker 1: But that's the NBC poll, right, And they've got absolutely
Speaker 1: every motive to defeat Trump. And I think you know,
Speaker 1: all of these major networks, other than Fox have done
Speaker 1: a lot to try to accomplish that, and they've got
Speaker 1: to acknowledge that she's leaking oil. She's lost five points
Speaker 1: in favorability and five points in the polls since she
Speaker 1: started doing all of these interviews and obviously these hard hitting,
Speaker 1: very true spots running heavily in the swing states and
Speaker 1: critically what you just heard, right, because you all know
Speaker 1: you know it from yourself. I mean, when you go
Speaker 1: in there and vote, I think the vast majority of
Speaker 1: people in the end, I mean, they may talk about
Speaker 1: and they may talk about, you know, with friends and neighbors,
Speaker 1: this and that, the things that make them angry. They
Speaker 1: vote on the things that affect them, that affect them.
Speaker 1: And when you have people telling these pollsters that, hey,
Speaker 1: you know, yeah, bottom line, my life and that's going
Speaker 1: to mean the life of their family, which is what
Speaker 1: all of us are fiercely devoted to.
Speaker 2: Right better under Trump?
Speaker 1: I mean I think what that means is once again
Speaker 1: Trump's going to outperform the post because you probably got
Speaker 1: people telling these posters, no, I'm voting for Harris, but
Speaker 1: some of the same people saying my life was better
Speaker 1: under Trump. What do you think is going to win
Speaker 1: out in the end. Date five to five or zer
Speaker 1: a five A two five five the number. Let's get
Speaker 1: to the phone lines. Eerie, Mike kind enough to join
Speaker 1: us on the Dan Caplis show.
Speaker 6: How you doing, Eerie fine lyle?
Speaker 2: How are you living the dream? My friend?
Speaker 8: Hey, you asked us a put what question would we
Speaker 8: if we were Brett bar Yes, we pose to Kamala Harris.
Speaker 8: I would give a lot of money to be able
Speaker 8: to pose this question. The question would be, well, would
Speaker 8: you be willing to sit side by side in a
Speaker 8: televised cognitive test with Donald Trump side my side televised?
Speaker 8: That would be the question.
Speaker 1: Oh man, you could retire the national debt with that one.
Speaker 1: Just just go pay per view on that. Yeah, thank you, Mike.
Speaker 2: I like that. No, I would pay to watch that.
Speaker 1: But the truth is we have that cognitive exam every
Speaker 1: day and in a much more reliable fashion, right because
Speaker 1: I I'm privileged to be able to try a lot
Speaker 1: of cases and a lot of really serious injury cases,
Speaker 1: including serious brain damage cases, and so I'm presenting brain
Speaker 1: damage evidence to juries all the time. And when you
Speaker 1: get you get this cognitive testing done right, and the
Speaker 1: results are usually based on this anonymous this anonymous pool
Speaker 1: out there. If you're talking about neuropsych testing, you know
Speaker 1: this anonymous pool of folks out there, and then you're
Speaker 1: comparing somebody against quote baseline for somebody in their demo
Speaker 1: and is I like to tell juris because it's one
Speaker 1: thousand percent true. Now, the study you should rely on
Speaker 1: is from the University of your eyeballs. It's from the
Speaker 1: University of Real Life. And we bring in witnesses who
Speaker 1: talk about how the person was before the brain injury
Speaker 1: and how they are after the brain injury. That's where
Speaker 1: the truth lies, not in some numerical scale, in a
Speaker 1: cognitive test. So people get to see every day the
Speaker 1: truth the real lifetime cognitive testing of Kamala Harris and
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. And that's going to be far more revealing
Speaker 1: than anything you could get out of one of these
Speaker 1: scientific type cognitive tests. And I think any fair minded
Speaker 1: person would have to look at this and say, there's
Speaker 1: some well, let's.
Speaker 2: Put it as charitably as possible.
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris, Kamala Harris's intellectual abilities are completely unsuitable for
Speaker 1: the presidency. That she lacks the intellectual capabilities necessary to
Speaker 1: be precedent in a way that we've never seen before.
Speaker 1: And I'd love to hear from you on this, Texters
Speaker 1: those who disagree. First, have we ever had a major
Speaker 1: party nominee who so clearly lacked that the cognitive capacity
Speaker 1: to be president? Doesn't mean they're dumb, doesn't mean they're
Speaker 1: this name, that name, But when it comes to the
Speaker 1: cognitive skill sets necessary to be president, we're so obviously lacking.
Speaker 10: Now.
Speaker 1: You may have disagreed with candidates fiercely on policy or
Speaker 1: morality or this or that, but just plain old cognitive
Speaker 1: ability to do the job. I can't think of anybody
Speaker 1: in our lifetime who even comes close to the deficit
Speaker 1: she brings to the table. Let's go to Paul in
Speaker 1: Colorado springs here on the Dan Capitlo Show. It should
Speaker 1: be this simple, right, if you cannot do a press conference,
Speaker 1: if you don't have the cognitive capacity to do a
Speaker 1: press conference, you don't have the cognitive capacity to be president. Paul,
Speaker 1: Welcome to the show.
Speaker 6: Hey Dan, I hate switched gears on you, but I
Speaker 6: got my ballad in the mail yesterday and I was
Speaker 6: spilling it all out and then got to some of
Speaker 6: the amendments stuff and I was like, man, this is
Speaker 6: kind of odd because it's pretty vague. So I was
Speaker 6: wondering if you could, you could walk through the amendments
Speaker 6: that are proposed and and what you think about them.
Speaker 2: My friend, thank you for that.
Speaker 1: And you know what I'd like to do, if you
Speaker 1: don't mind, is I want to do the same thing.
Speaker 1: I want to sit down with them and I want
Speaker 1: to go through them all and I want to be
Speaker 1: able to offer some fully informed, educated opinions. There's one
Speaker 1: amendment that I've been most focused on, and we're going
Speaker 1: to have a special guest on at five oh six,
Speaker 1: a doctor Christine Wheeler. I've been very focused on seventy nine,
Speaker 1: which would enshrine infanticide in Colorado's constitutions. Say you could
Speaker 1: a perfectly healthy mom, perfectly healthy baby, the mom's about
Speaker 1: to deliver and not just kill the baby, and it
Speaker 1: would enshrine it in the constitutions, say Paul from Colorado
Speaker 1: Springs has to pay for it and take away parental notifications.
Speaker 1: So I've been very focused on that campaign. And I
Speaker 1: know we're getting Christy Burton Brown on soon right on
Speaker 1: school choice, which is eighty and they're also running a
Speaker 1: great ballot measure on support for law enforcement financial support
Speaker 1: for law enforcement.
Speaker 2: But can you give me a few.
Speaker 1: Days to just just go through everything and do a
Speaker 1: full show on it.
Speaker 8: Yeah, I can do that.
Speaker 6: And yeah, I already voted on the abortion one. I'm
Speaker 6: totally anti totally cool life and anti abortion. And I've
Speaker 6: already voted on the marijuana one, so anti marijuana, and
Speaker 6: and I'm pro school choice. But there's a couple in
Speaker 6: there that I'm computing.
Speaker 1: Which ones which ones because that I'll pay special attention.
Speaker 8: The ones that have changing to the election laws.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, all the rank choice voting stuff.
Speaker 8: No, no, right, I voted against rank troy voting.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 6: But then there's ones that are like should we change deadlines?
Speaker 2: And okay?
Speaker 11: And I'm like, yeah, yeah, And.
Speaker 6: Then maybe you could help us out with some judges,
Speaker 6: because I don't know any of these judges and if
Speaker 6: they're good or bad.
Speaker 1: You know, that's a fair question and something I've said
Speaker 1: on here before, Paul, so thanks for the chance to
Speaker 1: repeat it.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: You know, my real job is I'm a practicing trial
Speaker 1: lawyer and in front of judges here and elsewhere all
Speaker 1: the time, and so my role on air for the
Speaker 1: almost thirty years I've been on air. Is I will
Speaker 1: never say anything on air that I don't believe. But
Speaker 1: I will never criticize a judge on air because I'm
Speaker 1: a practicing trial lawyer and I've just got to put
Speaker 1: my clients first.
Speaker 8: And so I maybe you could bring somebody else on there.
Speaker 1: Yeah, maybe on the Ryan's Show.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but no, it's it's a very fair question, man.
Speaker 6: I just think about these judges and it's like, hey, no,
Speaker 6: I'll just give us a rundown on the good ones
Speaker 6: versus the bad ones.
Speaker 8: So we know, have put on the judges because I
Speaker 8: don't spend.
Speaker 6: My life in court.
Speaker 8: Yeah, and who's the good ones and who's the bad ones?
Speaker 8: I don't follow it that close.
Speaker 1: Very fair question. What I'm about to say to you
Speaker 1: now is absolutely true. It's not meant to try to
Speaker 1: kiss up or anything else. But I was I was
Speaker 1: sitting down with a friend because they had the same
Speaker 1: question for me, and the friend.
Speaker 2: I think it was you Ryan, wasn't it. Didn't you
Speaker 2: show me your yesterday?
Speaker 1: Yeah, And we were just going through Ryan's bellot because
Speaker 1: he had the same question. He said, you know, hey,
Speaker 1: you know which of these judges should I vote for
Speaker 1: or against? And I went through the entire list, and
Speaker 1: there were some I didn't know simply because you know,
Speaker 1: I'm a trial lawyer. I'm operating at the trial court level.
Speaker 1: For appeals, we bring in a pellet specialist on the
Speaker 1: rare occasions there are appeals. But I didn't see a
Speaker 1: single judge on either the appellate list or the trial
Speaker 1: court list who I would have been critical of. Oh,
Speaker 1: and I saw a number I think are stars, So
Speaker 1: I know that it.
Speaker 2: Kiss up stuff. But I'm just Ryan, and I had
Speaker 2: that conversation.
Speaker 7: Yeah, obviously I'm going to turn to you as an
Speaker 7: expert on the subject, and I guess compared to me,
Speaker 7: And yeah, you definitely recommended a reference to that. You
Speaker 7: had strongly positive opinions.
Speaker 1: Of him, Yeah, and no negative opinions about any of them.
Speaker 1: So Paul, Yeah, let me dig into all that stuff
Speaker 1: and then we'll do a show on it next week.
Speaker 1: But but I appreciate you wanting my opinion.
Speaker 6: Well, I listen to you every day, thank you on
Speaker 6: the podcast, and I appreciate your opinions. So when you're wrong, well.
Speaker 2: No, you sound like my wife there.
Speaker 1: But I would do this Paul, I would I would
Speaker 1: respectfully ask you this on seventy nine. You must know
Speaker 1: a ton of pro abortion people, right they call themselves
Speaker 1: pro choice. But what I'd say is, if you know,
Speaker 1: if you know any pro abortion people, please try to
Speaker 1: talk to him about seventy nine because the key to
Speaker 1: defeating seventy nine. They need fifty five percent because it's
Speaker 1: a constitutional amendment. The key to defeating seventy nine is
Speaker 1: getting to pro abortion people who just think this is
Speaker 1: way too far to strip away parental notification, to make
Speaker 1: taxpayers pay for it, pay for abortion, to allow abortion
Speaker 1: onhealthy babies and moms at nine months. So please try
Speaker 1: to work on some of those folks, and Paul appreciate
Speaker 1: the call.
Speaker 2: My friend up against a heartbreak. You're on the Dan
Speaker 2: Kapla Show.
Speaker 7: And now back to the Dan Kapla Show podcast the place.
Speaker 12: But when I fixing out, the markets are looking at
Speaker 12: the fact you are making all these promises. Latest one
Speaker 12: was Carloans. You're flooding the thing with I giving giveaways.
Speaker 12: But when I was actually quite kind to you, I
Speaker 12: use seven trillion. The upper estimate is fifteen trillion. People
Speaker 12: like the Wall Street Journal, who's hardly a communist organization.
Speaker 12: But you know they have criticized you on this as well.
Speaker 12: You are running out enormous debt.
Speaker 2: What is the Wall Street Journal now I'm meeting with
Speaker 2: them tomorrow. What is the Wall Street Journal? That they've
Speaker 2: been wrong about everything?
Speaker 8: So have you?
Speaker 2: By the way, you've been wrong.
Speaker 12: You're trying to turn this, You're trying to turn this young.
Speaker 6: You're trying to turn.
Speaker 8: You're trying to turn this into debates. There are business there,
Speaker 8: but you're wrong.
Speaker 2: You've been wrong. You've been wrong all your life on
Speaker 2: this stuff. And think about it.
Speaker 1: This is going on at the same time that that
Speaker 1: Harris obviously just broke and and completely desperate. Now is
Speaker 1: that Trump doesn't have the cognitive ability to be present, right,
Speaker 1: because everybody can see sheep doesn't. When was it this
Speaker 1: guy chooses he wasn't kidnapped, There were no handcuffs, there
Speaker 1: was no bag over his head. He chose to go
Speaker 1: on stage with that guy that the Bloomberg News editor
Speaker 1: in chief and talk about the economy, and then whether
Speaker 1: you agree or disagree with his policies, you listen to
Speaker 1: the way that he handled it. Yeah, and that's one
Speaker 1: of the many reasons now why he is trending toward victory,
Speaker 1: and probably a very significant victory. Let's get to the
Speaker 1: phone lines, which are in fuego. Allow me to respond
Speaker 1: to one text before that, and this is a Texter.
Speaker 2: Who's challenge to me.
Speaker 1: Dan, Are you saying Kamala is less cognitive than Biden
Speaker 1: was in the twenty twenty election.
Speaker 2: Absolutely?
Speaker 1: Absolutely, Joe Biden in that twenty twenty election infinitely superior
Speaker 1: cognitively if you're talking about the cognitive skills necessary to
Speaker 1: be president, and as deficient as Biden was, and I
Speaker 1: think Biden was cognitively disqualified in twenty twenty. In twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: Biden did not have the cognitive ability to become pres
Speaker 1: in the United States, as I said at the time,
Speaker 1: but even in that state, he had far more cognitive
Speaker 1: capacity for this job than Harris. Because remember in twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: there were times during debates, etc.
Speaker 2: When Biden could be very.
Speaker 1: Cogent and lucid for an hour or two, and he
Speaker 1: could form these thoughts, he could articulate these thoughts, he
Speaker 1: could defend arguments in ways light years beyond what we've
Speaker 1: ever seen from Harris. Let's go back to the phone lines,
Speaker 1: we'll start with Bill and Broomfield.
Speaker 2: You're on the Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 11: Welcome, Oh hey, Dan, how are you great?
Speaker 2: Thank you?
Speaker 1: And it goes back to a point I think that
Speaker 1: Ryan made one time. Let me see if you can
Speaker 1: answer this question. Have can you remember a single brilliant
Speaker 1: thing that Kamala Harris ever said? And does the left
Speaker 1: point to anything in particular? Oh you say she doesn't
Speaker 1: have the cognitive ability. Look at this speech or that speech.
Speaker 1: The left can't find a single thing to point to.
Speaker 1: But that's not why you call Bill fire away my friend.
Speaker 11: Okay, real quick, A couple of things about my first
Speaker 11: vote was for Ronald Reagan in nineteen eighty. I was
Speaker 11: all in for Trump in sixteen he won. Between me
Speaker 11: and you, I think in the audience that twenty twenty,
Speaker 11: I said, we officially became a Banana Republic. I know.
Speaker 11: And I've heard you say you don't think it was
Speaker 11: rig I do, and case in point. And we saw
Speaker 11: all those things after the elections. But here's my point, Dan,
Speaker 11: is that the left will do anything to still the election.
Speaker 11: And I've heard you know, we talked about long term
Speaker 11: like twenty you know, the midterms in twenty eight I
Speaker 11: don't think the left the way terris one thing they'll
Speaker 11: do when the right, when we get a victory, we celebrate,
Speaker 11: and when the left loses, we'll just keep going. And
Speaker 11: you know you're going. And what I do worry about
Speaker 11: is the election coming out. And you know, damn, I
Speaker 11: saw this after twenty sixteen, and I don't know, but
Speaker 11: I heard the audio. There was a bunch of Google
Speaker 11: people and there was one lady Dan who specifically said, well,
Speaker 11: you will not let this happen again. So I am
Speaker 11: you know, I am drawing some stringfall how you feel
Speaker 11: about everything. And I appreciate it some of the audience,
Speaker 11: but I'm just not quite sure they're going to steal
Speaker 11: this thay you can Dan.
Speaker 1: Hey, Bill, appreciate the con and you are not alone
Speaker 1: and having that concern.
Speaker 2: My friend.
Speaker 1: I told the story on air. We have a bad
Speaker 1: connection with you, Bill. I told the story on air
Speaker 1: a couple of months ago about somebody I considered to
Speaker 1: be maybe the most conservative person I've ever met, not politically,
Speaker 1: but just in terms of being a very careful person,
Speaker 1: careful with their words. Former bank president, somebody you know,
Speaker 1: not the opposite of a flame thrower, and we were
Speaker 1: just sitting at dinner one night and he just said,
Speaker 1: I'm afraid they're going to steal it. And I said what,
Speaker 1: and because we were talking about how the polls are
Speaker 1: shaping up and everything else, and he said, yeah, he said,
Speaker 1: I'm afraid they're going to steal it. And I'm thinking,
Speaker 1: you know what, this is one of the most intelligent
Speaker 1: people I've ever met, one of the most grounded people.
Speaker 1: I've never heard him say a single word that could
Speaker 1: be characterized as bomb throwing or anything like that. Always
Speaker 1: very temperate in his choice of words, and I was
Speaker 1: absolutely stunned. Now, you see all the polls where you
Speaker 1: have very large numbers of people, particularly in the Republican Party,
Speaker 1: who share that concern, and so I believe me, I'm
Speaker 1: not in any way, shape or form trying to discount
Speaker 1: Bill's fears. What I'm saying is we got to control
Speaker 1: everything we can control and just go out there and
Speaker 1: do everything we can to help Trump and all these
Speaker 1: other candidates get all the boats they possibly can.
Speaker 2: Here on the Dan Kapla Show,